HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP Sand Point School 2012-EEManaging Office
2400 College Road 3105 Lakeshore Dr. Suite 106A 4402 Thane Road
Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 Juneau, Alaska 99801
p. 907.452.5688 p. 907.222.2445 p: 907.586.6813
f. 907.452.5694 f. 907.222.0915 f: 907.586.6819
www.nortechengr.com
ENERGY AUDIT – FINAL REPORT
SAND POINT SCHOOL
PO Box 269
Sand Point, Alaska
Prepared for:
Mr. Jim Brown
PO Box 349
Sand Point, Alaska
Prepared by:
David Lanning PE, CEA
Jeremy Spargur EIT, CEAIT
July 9, 2012
Acknowledgment: "This material is based upon work supported by the Department of
Energy under Award Number DE-EE0000095.”
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, HEALTH & SAFETY
Anch: 3105 Lakeshore Dr. Ste 106A, 99517 907.222.2445 Fax: 222.0915
Fairbanks: 2400 College Road, 99709 907.452.5688 Fax: 452.5694
Juneau: 4402 Thane Road, 99801 907.586.6813 Fax: 586.6819
info@nortechengr.com www.nortechengr.com
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09
Final AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1
2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Building Use .......................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Building Occupancy and Schedules ...................................................................... 4
2.3 Building Description ............................................................................................... 4
3.0 BENCHMARKING 2010 UTILITY DATA .......................................................................... 7
3.1 Total Energy Use and Cost of 2010 ...................................................................... 8
3.2 Energy Utilization Index of 2010 ............................................................................ 9
3.3 Cost Utilization Index of 2010 .............................................................................. 10
3.4 Seasonal Energy Use Patterns ........................................................................... 11
3.5 Future Energy Monitoring .................................................................................... 12
4.0 MODELING ENERGY CONSUMPTION ......................................................................... 13
4.1 Understanding How AkWarm Models Energy Consumption ............................... 14
4.2 AkWarm Calculated Savings for the Sand Point School ..................................... 15
4.3 Additional Modeling Methods .............................................................................. 16
5.0 BUILDING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) .............................................. 17
5.1 Operations and Maintenance .............................................................................. 17
5.2 Commissioning .................................................................................................... 17
5.3 Building Specific Recommendations ................................................................... 17
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09
Final AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
ii
APPENDICES
Appendix A Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures ........................................... 20
Appendix B Energy Efficiency Measures that are NOT Recommended ..................... 31
Appendix C Significant Equipment List ....................................................................... 33
Appendix D Local Utility Rate Structure ...................................................................... 37
Appendix E Analysis Methodology .............................................................................. 38
Appendix F Audit Limitations ...................................................................................... 39
Appendix G References .............................................................................................. 40
Appendix H Typical Energy Use and Cost – Fairbanks and Anchorage ..................... 41
Appendix I Typical Energy Use and Cost – Continental U.S. .................................... 42
Appendix J List of Conversion Factors and Energy Units .......................................... 43
Appendix K List of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions .................................... 44
Appendix L Building Floor Plan .................................................................................. 45
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NORTECH has completed an ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit of the Sand Point School, a
49,293 square foot facility in Sand Point. The audit began with benchmarking which resulted in
a calculation of the energy consumption per square foot. A site inspection was completed on
December 11, 2011 to obtain information about the lighting, heating, ventilation, cooling and
other building energy uses. The existing usage data and current systems were then used to
develop a building energy consumption model using AkWarm.
Once the model was calibrated, a number of Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) were
developed from review of the data and observations. EEMs were evaluated and ranked on the
basis of both energy savings and cost using a Savings/Investment Ratio (SIR). While these
modeling techniques were successful in verifying that many of the EEMs would save energy,
not all of the identified EEMs were considered cost effective based on the hardware, installation,
and energy costs at the time of this audit.
While the need for a major retrofit can typically be identified by an energy audit, upgrading
specific systems often requires collecting additional data and engineering and design efforts that
are beyond the scope of the Level II energy audit. The necessity and amount of design effort
and cost will vary depending on the scope of the specific EEMs planned and the sophistication
and capability of the entire design team, including the building owners and operators. During
the budgeting process for any major retrofit identified in this report, the building owner should
add administrative and supplemental design costs to cover the individual needs of their own
organization and the overall retrofit project.
The recommended EEMs for the Sand Point School are summarized in the table below.
Additional discussion of the modeling process can be found in Section 3. Details of each
individual EEM can be found in Appendix A of this report. A summary of EEMs that were
evaluated but are not currently recommended is located in Appendix B.
PRIORITY LIST – ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES (EEMs)
Rank Feature/
Location Improvement Description
Estimated
Annual
Energy
Savings
Estimated
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio, SIR
Simple
Payback
(Years)
1 Other Electrical:
Pool Pump Turn off pool pump at night $5,509 $2,000 17 0.4
2 Ventilation
1) repair outside air
dampers
2) Install Demand
Control Ventilation
3) Limit Outside air
intake to ASHRAE
minimum
$30,864 $25,000 16 0.8
3
Lighting: (1)
Exterior Ceiling
Mount HPS
Replace with (1) LED 17W
Module StdElectronic $219 $450 5.7 2.1
4 Lighting: Interior Replace 32 watt T8 lamps with
25 watt lamps $7,775 $13,512 3.7 1.7
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
2
PRIORITY LIST – ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES (EEMs)
Rank Feature/
Location Improvement Description
Estimated
Annual
Energy
Savings
Estimated
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio, SIR
Simple
Payback
(Years)
5 HVAC And DHW
replace pumps with variable
speed pump, replace selected
motors with more efficient
motors
$11,237 $60,000 2.6 5.3
6
On- or Below-
Grade Floor,
Perimeter:
Perimeter
Install R-30 encapsulated
Fiberglass Batts on the
Perimeter 4 feet of the Crawl
Space Floor.
$2,590 $26,666 2.3 10
TOTAL, cost-effective measures $58,205 $128,169 5.6 2.2
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
3
Modeled Building Energy Cost Breakdown
The above charts are a graphical representation of the modeled energy usage for the Sand
Point School. The greatest portions of energy cost for the building are envelope air losses,
lighting and other electrical. Detailed improvements can be found in Appendix A.
The energy cost by end use breakdown was provided by AkWarm based on the field inspection
and does not indicate that all individual fixtures and appliances were directly measured. The
current energy costs are shown above on the left hand pie graph and the projected energy
costs, assuming use of the recommended EEMs, are shown on the right.
The chart breaks down energy usage by cost into the following categories:
Envelope Air Losses—the cost to provide heated fresh air to occupants, air leakage, heat lost in
air through the chimneys and exhaust fans, heat lost to wind and other similar losses.
Envelope
o Ceiling—quantified heat loss transferred through the ceiling portion of the envelope.
o Window—quantified heat loss through the window portion of the envelope.
o Wall/Door—quantified heat loss through the wall and door portions of the envelope.
o Floor—quantified heat loss through the floor portion of the envelope.
Water Heating—energy cost to provide domestic hot water.
Fans—energy cost to run ventilation, and exhaust fans.
Lighting—energy cost to light the building.
Refrigeration—energy costs to provide refrigerated goods for the occupants.
Other Electrical—includes energy costs not listed above including cooking loads, laundry loads,
other plug loads and electronics.
Envelope
Air Losses
$113,260
41%
Ceiling
$19,431
7%Window
$2,221
1%
Wall/Door
$13,880
5%
Floor
$18,877
7%
Water
Heating
$8,513
3%
Fans
$8,187
3%
Lighting
$44,312
16%
Refriger-
ation
$5,798
Other
Electrical
$34,482
13%
Existing Building Energy Cost
$274,360 Envelope
Air Losses
$80,024
29%
Ceiling
$18,895
7%
Window
$1,668
0%
Wall/Door
$13,337
5%Floor
$15,561
6%
Water
Heating
$8,610
3%
Fans
$4,675
2%
Lighting
$34,705
13%
Refriger-
ation
$11,197
4%
Other
Electrical
$27,483
10%
EEM
Savings
$58,206
21%
Retrofit Building Energy Cost
$216,154
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
4
2.0 INTRODUCTION
The Alaska Housing Finance Corporation contracted with NORTECH to perform ASHRAE
Level II Energy Audits for publically owned buildings in Alaska. This report presents the findings
of the utility benchmarking, modeling analysis, and the recommended building modifications,
and building use changes that are expected to save energy and money.
The report is organized into sections covering:
description of the facility,
the building’s historic energy usage (benchmarking),
estimating energy use through energy use modeling,
evaluation of potential energy efficiency or efficiency improvements, and
recommendations for energy efficiency with estimates of the costs and savings.
2.1 Building Use
The Sand Point School provides Kindergarten through 12th grade education for the community
of Sand Point, Alaska.
2.2 Building Occupancy and Schedules
The building is occupied by 99 students and 16 full time staff members from 8 am – 5 pm
Monday – Friday during the school year from the middle of August to the middle of May. The
school is occupied after school hours for the use of the public library, gym, and pool.
2.3 Building Description
The school is a one-story, wood-framed building that with a crawlspace with insulated walls built
in 1983. The building consists of classrooms, a gym and a pool. Additions include expanding the
library and computer, adding classrooms to the elementary wing, and adding a weight room and
storage to the gym.
Building Envelope
Building Envelope: Walls
Wall Type Description Insulation Notes
Crawlspace walls
original Wood-framed with 2x6 studs R-19 fiberglass batt. -
Crawlspace walls
addition Wood-framed with 2x8 studs R-25 fiberglass batt. -
Above grade wall
original Wood-framed with 2x6 studs R-19 fiberglass batt. -
Above grade wall
addition Wood-framed with 2x8 studs R-25 fiberglass batt. -
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
5
Building Envelope: Floors
Floor Type Description Insulation Notes
Crawlspace Floor Gravel pad None -
Building Envelope: Roof
Roof Type Description Insulation Notes
All Roofs Hot roof framed with wood
trusses. 4” rigid board -
Building Envelope: Doors and Windows
Door and Window
Type Description Estimated
R-Value Notes
Door 1 Insulated metal, quarter-lite 3.6 235 SF
Door 2 Flush metal door 5.0 21 SF
Door 3 Fiberglass door 6.3 45 SF
Door 4 Wood door 3.7 22 SF
Garage Door Insulated sectional door 5.6 156 SF
Window 1 Double pane, vinyl, south, >3/8”
air gap 2.0 960 SF
Window 2 Double pane, vinyl, not south,
>3/8” air gap 2.0 803 SF
Window 3 Double pane, vinyl, low e, not
south, >3/8” air gap 2.6 80 SF
Window 4 Double pane, aluminum, not
south, >3/8” air gap 1.2 15 SF
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
6
Heating and Ventilation Systems
The building uses two boilers to send heat to the following zones:
baseboard fin tubes
cabinet heaters
unit heaters
six air handling units (AHUs)
DHW
Six AHUs provide ventilation to the following zones:
F1 – Secondary School
F2 – Elementary School addition
F3 – Elementary School
F4 – Gym
F5 – Locker rooms
F6 - Pool
Air Conditioning System
The building is not equipped with an air conditioning system.
Energy Management
The school is not equipped with an energy management system.
Lighting Systems
The majority of the interior lighting consists of ceiling mounted fluorescent fixtures containing T8
(1” diameter, 4’long) lamps and occupancy sensors. Other lighting types consist of display
lighting with T12 (1 ½” diameter, 4’ long) lamps and task lights containing CFLs and
incandescent lamps. Exterior lighting consists of wall mounted containing two 42 watt CFL
lamps.
Domestic Hot Water
Domestic hot water is provided by an indirect fired water heater with an 80 gallon storage
capacity. The kitchen utilizes a booster heater for dishwashing.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
7
3.0 BENCHMARKING 2010 UTILITY DATA
Benchmarking building energy use consists of obtaining and then analyzing two years of energy
bills. The original utility bills are necessary to determine the raw usage, and charges as well as
to evaluate the utility’s rate structure. The metered usage of electrical and natural gas
consumption is measured monthly, but heating oil, propane, wood, and other energy sources
are normally billed upon delivery and provide similar information. During benchmarking,
information is compiled in a way that standardizes the units of energy and creates energy use
and billing rate information statistics for the building on a square foot basis. The objectives of
benchmarking are:
to understand patterns of use,
to understand building operational characteristics,
for comparison with other similar facilities in Alaska and across the country, and
to offer insight in to potential energy savings.
The results of the benchmarking, including the energy use statistics and comparisons to other
areas, are discussed in the following sections.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
8
3.1 Total Energy Use and Cost of 2010
The energy use profiles below show the energy and cost breakdowns for the Sand Point
School. The total 2010 energy use for the building was 6,328 mmBTU and the total cost was
$307,953. These charts show the portion of use for a fuel type and the portion of its cost.
The above charts indicate that the highest portion of energy use is for oil and the highest portion
of cost is split evenly between electric and oil. Fuel oil consumption correlates directly to space
heating and domestic hot water while electrical use can correlate to lighting systems, plug loads,
and HVAC equipment. The energy type with the highest cost often provides the most
opportunity for savings.
Electric
1,023
16%
Oil
5,305
84%
Energy Use Total (mmBTU)
Electric
$159,994
52%
Oil
$147,959
48%
Energy Cost Total ($)
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
9
3.2 Energy Utilization Index of 2010
The primary benchmarking statistic is the Energy Utilization Index (EUI). The EUI is calculated
from the utility bills and provides a simple snapshot of the quantity of energy actually used by
the building on a square foot and annual basis. The calculation converts the total energy use
for the year from all sources in the building, such as heating fuel and electrical usage, into
British Thermal Units (BTUs). This total annual usage is then divided by the number of square
feet of the building. The EUI units are BTUs per square foot per year.
The benchmark analysis found that the Sand Point School has an EUI of 128,000 BTUs per
square foot per year.
The EUI is useful in comparing this building’s energy use to that of other similar buildings in
Alaska and in the Continental United States. The EUI can be compared to average energy use
in 2003 found in a study by the U.S. Energy Information Administration of commercial buildings
(abbreviated CBECS, 2006). That report found an overall average energy use of about 90,000
BTUs per square foot per year while studying about 6,000 commercial buildings of all sizes,
types, and uses that were located all over the Continental U.S. (see Table C3 in Appendix I).
In a recent and unpublished state-wide benchmarking study sponsored by the Alaska Housing
Finance Corporation, schools in Fairbanks averaged 62,000 BTUs per square foot and schools
in Anchorage averaged 123,000 BTUs per square foot annual energy use. The chart below
shows the Sand Point School relative to these values. These findings are discussed further in
Appendix H.
128,000
62,000
123,000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
Btu/ Sq. FtAnnual Energy Use Index (Total Energy/ SF)
Sand Point School Fairbanks Schools Anchorage Schools
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
10
3.3 Cost Utilization Index of 2010
Another useful benchmarking statistic is the Cost Utilization Index (CUI), which is the cost for
energy used in the building on a square foot basis per year. The CUI is calculated from the cost
for utilities for a year period. The CUI permits comparison of buildings on total energy cost even
though they may be located in areas with differing energy costs and differing heating and/or
cooling climates. The cost of energy, including heating oil, natural gas, and electricity, can vary
greatly over time and geographic location and can be higher in Alaska than other parts of the
country.
The CUI for Sand Point School is about $6.25/SF This is based on utility costs from 2010 and
the following rates:
Electricity at $ 0.52 / kWh ($15.24 / Therm)
# 2 Fuel Oil at $ 3.59 / gallon ($ 2.56 / Therm)
The Department of Energy Administration study, mentioned in the previous section (CBECS,
2006) found an average cost of $2.52 per square foot in 2003 for 4,400 buildings in the
Continental U.S (Tables C4 and C13 of CBDES, 2006). Schools in Fairbanks have an average
cost for energy of $2.42 per square foot while Anchorage schools average $2.11 per square
foot. The chart below shows the Sand Point School relative to these values. More details are
included in Appendix H.
$6.25
$2.42
$2.11
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
Annual Energy Cost Index (Total Cost/ SF)
Sand Point School Fairbanks Schools Anchorage Schools
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
11
3.4 Seasonal Energy Use Patterns
Energy consumption is often highly correlated with seasonal climate and usage variations. The
graphs below show the electric and fuel consumption of this building over the course of two
years. The lowest monthly use is called the baseline use. The electric baseline often reflects
year round lighting consumption while the heating fuel baseline often reflects year round hot
water usage. The clear relation of increased energy usage during periods of cold weather can
be seen in the months with higher usage.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Jan-09Mar-09May-09Jul-09Sep-09Nov-09Jan-10Mar-10May-10Jul-10Sep-10Nov-10KWHElectrical Consumption
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Jan-09Mar-09May-09Jul-09Sep-09Nov-09Jan-10Mar-10May-10Jul-10Sep-10Nov-10GallonsFuel Oil Deliveries
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
12
3.5 Future Energy Monitoring
Energy accounting is the process of tracking energy consumption and costs. It is important for
the building owner or manager to monitor and record both the energy usage and cost each
month. Comparing trends over time can assist in pinpointing major sources of energy usage and
aid in finding effective energy efficiency measures. There are two basic methods of energy
accounting: manual and automatic. Manual tracking of energy usage may already be performed
by an administrative assistant, however if the records are not scrutinized for energy use, then
the data is merely a financial accounting. Digital energy tracking systems, such as Smart Meters
can be installed. They display and record real-time energy usage and accumulated energy use
and cost. There are several other types including OptoEMU by Opto22 which has all of the
information accessible via Ethernet browser.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
13
4.0 MODELING ENERGY CONSUMPTION
After benchmarking of a building is complete and the site visit has identified the specific systems
in the building, a number of different methods are available for quantifying the overall energy
consumption and to model the energy use. These range from relatively simple spreadsheets to
commercially available modeling software capable of handling complex building systems.
NORTECH has used several of these programs and uses the worksheets and software that
best matches the complexity of the building and specific energy use that is being evaluated.
Modeling of an energy efficiency measure (EEM) requires an estimate of the current energy
used by the specific feature, the estimated energy use of the proposed EEM and its installed
cost. EEMs can range from a single simple upgrade, such as light bulb type or type of motor, to
reprogramming of the controls on more complex systems. While the need for a major retrofit
can typically be identified by an energy audit, the specific system upgrades often require
collecting additional data and engineering and design efforts that are beyond the scope of the
Level II energy audit.
.
Based on the field inspection results and discussions with the building owners/operators,
auditors developed potential EEMs for the facility. Common EEMs that could apply to almost
every older building include:
Reduce the envelope heat losses through:
o increased building insulation, and
o better windows and doors
Reduce temperature difference between inside and outside using setback thermostats
Upgrade inefficient:
o lights,
o motors,
o refrigeration units, and
o other appliances
Reduce running time of lights/appliances through:
o motion sensors,
o on/off timers,
o light sensors, and
o other automatic/programmable systems
The objective of the following sections is to describe how the overall energy use of the building
was modeled and the potential for energy savings. The specific EEMs that provide these overall
energy savings are detailed in Appendix A of this report. While the energy savings of an EEM is
unlikely to change significantly over time, the cost savings of an EEM is highly dependent on the
current energy price and can vary significantly over time. An EEM that is not currently
recommended based on price may be more attractive at a later date or with higher energy
prices.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
14
4.1 Understanding How AkWarm Models Energy Consumption
NORTECH used the AkWarm model for evaluating the overall energy consumption at Sand
Point School. The AkWarm program was developed by the Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation (AHFC) to model residential energy use. The original AkWarm is the modeling
engine behind the successful residential energy upgrade program that AHFC has operated for a
number of years. In the past few years, AHFC has developed a version of this model for
commercial buildings.
Energy use in buildings is modeled by calculating energy losses and consumption, such as:
• Heat lost through the building envelope components, including windows, doors,
walls, ceilings, crawlspaces, and foundations. These heat losses are computed for
each component based on the area, heat resistance (R-value), and the difference
between the inside temperature and the outside temperature. AkWarm has a library
of temperature profiles for villages and cities in Alaska.
• Window orientation, such as the fact that south facing windows can add heat in the
winter but north-facing windows do not.
• Inefficiencies of the heating system, including the imperfect conversion of fuel oil or
natural gas due to heat loss in exhaust gases, incomplete combustion, excess air,
etc. Some electricity is also consumed in moving the heat around a building through
pumping.
• Inefficiencies of the cooling system, if one exists, due to various imperfections in a
mechanical system and the required energy to move the heat around.
• Lighting requirements and inefficiencies in the conversion of electricity to light;
ultimately all of the power used for lighting is converted to heat. While the heat may
be useful in the winter, it often isn’t useful in the summer when cooling may be
required to remove the excess heat. Lights are modeled by wattage and operational
hours.
• Use and inefficiencies in refrigeration, compressor cooling, and heat pumps. Some
units are more efficient than others. Electricity is required to move the heat from
inside a compartment to outside it. Again, this is a function of the R-Value and the
temperature difference between the inside and outside of the unit.
• Plug loads such as computers, printers, mini-fridges, microwaves, portable heaters,
monitors, etc. These can be a significant part of the overall electricity consumption
of the building, as well as contributing to heat production.
• The schedule of operation for lights, plug loads, motors, etc is a critical component of
how much energy is used.
AkWarm adds up these heat losses and the internal heat gains based on individual unit usage
schedules. These estimated heat and electrical usages are compared to actual use on both a
yearly and seasonal basis. If the AkWarm model is within 5 % to 10% of the most recent 12
months usage identified during benchmarking, the model is considered accurate enough to
make predictions of energy savings for possible EEMs.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
15
4.2 AkWarm Calculated Savings for the Sand Point School
Based on the field inspection results and discussions with the building owners/operators,
auditors developed potential EEMs for the facility. These EEMs are then entered into AkWarm
to determine if the EEM saves energy and is cost effective (i.e. will pay for itself). AkWarm
calculates the energy and money saved by each EEM and calculates the length of time for the
savings in reduced energy consumption to pay for the installation of the EEM. AkWarm makes
recommendations based on the Savings/Investment Ratio (SIR), which is defined as ratio of the
savings generated over the life of the EEM divided by the installed cost. Higher SIR values are
better and any SIR above one is considered acceptable. If the SIR of an EEM is below one, the
energy savings will not pay for the cost of the EEM and the EEM is not recommended.
Preferred EEMs are listed by AkWarm in order of the highest SIR.
A summary of the savings from the recommended EEMs are listed in this table.
Description Space
Heating
Water
Heating Lighting Refrigeration Other
Electrical
Ventilation
Fans Total
Existing
Building $167,669 $8,513 $44,312 $11,197 $34,482 $8,187 $274,360
With All
Proposed
Retrofits
$129,484 $8,610 $34,705 $11,197 $27,483 $4,675 $216,154
Savings $38,135 -$97 $9,607 $0 $6,999 $3,512 $58,206
Savings in these categories represent the overall savings for the building, and reflect any added
cost that might occur because of a retrofit. For example, installing more efficient lights will
increase the heating load and creating or lowering an unoccupied setback temperature will
increase hot water heat losses and cost.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
16
4.3 Additional Modeling Methods
The AkWarm program effectively models wood-framed and other buildings with standard
heating systems and relatively simple HVAC systems. AkWarm models of more complicated
mechanical systems are sometimes poor due to a number of simplifying assumptions and
limited input of some variables. Furthermore, AKWarm is unable to model complex HVAC
systems such as variable frequency motors, variable air volume (VAV) systems, those with
significant digital or pneumatic controls or significant heat recovery capacity. In addition, some
other building methods and occupancies are outside AkWarm capabilities.
This report section is included in order to identify benefits from modifications to those more
complex systems or changes in occupant behavior that cannot be addressed in AkWarm.
The Sand Point School was calibrated within NORTECH standards in AKWarm. Retrofits for the
HVAC system were adequately modeled in AkWarm and did not require additional calculations.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
17
5.0 BUILDING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M)
5.1 Operations and Maintenance
A well-implemented operation and maintenance (O & M) plan is often the driving force behind
energy savings. Such a plan includes preserving institutional knowledge, directing preventative
maintenance, and scheduling regular inspections of each piece of HVAC equipment within the
building. Such a plan includes a regularly scheduled inspection of each piece of HVAC
equipment within the building. Routine maintenance includes the timely replacement of filters,
belts and pulleys, the proper greasing of bearings and other details such as topping off the
glycol tanks. Additional benefits to a maintenance plan are decreased down time for
malfunctioning equipment, early indications of problems, prevention of exacerbated
maintenance issues, and early detection of overloading/overheating issues. A good
maintenance person knows the building’s equipment well enough to spot and repair minor
malfunctions before they become major retrofits.
Operations and Maintenance staff implementing a properly designed O & M plan will:
Track and document
o Renovations and repairs,
o Utility bills and fuel consumption, and
o System performance.
Keep available for reference
o A current Building Operating Plan including an inventory of installed systems,
o The most recent available as-built drawings,
o Reference manuals for all installed parts and systems, and
o An up-to-date inventory of on-hand replacement parts.
Provide training and continuing education for maintenance personnel.
Plan for commissioning and re-commissioning at appropriate intervals.
5.2 Commissioning
Commissioning of a building is the verification that the HVAC systems perform within the design
or usage ranges of the Building Operating Plan. This process ideally, though seldom, occurs as
the last phase in construction. HVAC system operation parameters degrade from ideal over time
due to incorrect maintenance, improper replacement pumps, changes in facility tenants or
usage, changes in schedules, and changes in energy costs or loads. Ideally, re-commissioning
of a building should occur every five to ten years. This ensures that the HVAC system meets
the potentially variable use with the most efficient means.
5.3 Building Specific Recommendations
The elementary wing of the school was noticeably colder than the rest of the building and
teachers reported this to be the case as well. A few mechanical issues that may be causing this
and should be examined are:
Inoperable thermostats
Inoperable valves
Low water temperature
Improperly working pumps
Closed valves
Pumps on wrong speed setting
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
18
The Wood Shop is divided into a classroom section and hands-on lab section. Two unit heaters
supply heat to the room, but the north unit, over the classroom, is broken and the other unit
heater cannot keep the room warm. The occupants leave the door to the adjacent Metal Shop
open and leave the unit heater in the Metal Shop on, which runs 24/7. Repairing or replacing the
broken unit heater will reduce the load on the single unit and help keep the room at the proper
temperature.
The building envelope appears relatively tight, but experiences flooding under all exterior doors
during the storms that frequent the area. There are also several roof/ceiling leaks throughout the
building that should be repaired. Exterior metal doors are corroded at the seams and base.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
19
APPENDICES
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
20
Appendix A Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures
A number of Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) are available to reduce the energy use and
overall operating cost for the facility. The EEMs listed below are those recommended by
AkWarm based on the calculated savings/investment ration (SIR) as described in Appendix E.
AkWarm also provides a breakeven cost, which is the maximum initial cost of the EEM that will
still return a SIR of one or greater.
This section describes each recommended EEM and identifies the potential energy savings and
installation costs. This also details the calculation of breakeven costs, simple payback, and the
SIR for each recommendation. The recommended EEMs are grouped together generally by the
overall end use that will be impacted.
A.1 Temperature Control
Programmable thermostats allow for automatic temperature setback, which reduce usage more
reliably than manual setbacks. Reduction of the nighttime temperature set point. The
occupancy schedule of the school and the heating requirements of the building do not allow for
a temperature setback.
A.2 Electrical Loads
A.2.1 Lighting
The electricity used by lighting eventually ends up as heat in the building. In areas where
electricity is more expensive than other forms of energy, or in areas where the summer
temperatures require cooling; this additional heat can be both wasteful and costly. Converting
to more efficient lighting reduces cooling loads in the summer and allows the user to control
heat input in the winter. The conversion from T12 (one and a half inch fluorescent bulbs) to T8
(one inch), T5 (5/8 inch), Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFL), or LED bulbs provides a significant
increase in efficiency. LED bulbs can be directly placed in existing fixtures. The LED bulb
bypasses the ballast altogether, which removes the often irritating, “buzzing” noise that
magnetic ballasts tend to make.
Replacing the single remaining 100 watt high pressure sodium lamp on the exterior of the
building with a 17 watt LED module is a cost effective way to save energy.
The majority of the lights in the school have been upgraded to 32 watt T8 lamps. It is cost
effective at this time due the schedules and local electric costs to replace these lamps
throughout the building with 25 watt T8s. Also, replacing incandescent lamps with CFLs is a
cost effective measure at this time to save energy.
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
3 Exterior Ceiling
Mount HPS
HPS 100 Watt StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with LED 17W Module
StdElectronic
Installation Cost $450 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 15 Energy Savings (/yr.) $219
Breakeven Cost $2,577 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 5.7 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
21
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Wood Shop FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard (2)
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR (4) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $28 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $95
Breakeven Cost $580 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 21 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 153 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard (2)
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR (4) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $28 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $95
Breakeven Cost $580 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 21 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 111 3 FLUOR T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard
Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with 3 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $33 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $90
Breakeven Cost $557 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 17 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
120, 190, East Arctic
Entry, SE Arctic
Entry, West Wind
Hallway
10 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 10 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $165 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $432
Breakeven Cost $2,630 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 16 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 170 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $17 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $43
Breakeven Cost $263 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 16 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
22
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Gym, E1 2 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $22 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $55
Breakeven Cost $340 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 16 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
East PE Arctic
Entry, West Wing
Hallway, East PE
Hallway
3 FLUOR T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard
Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with 3 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $149 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $334
Breakeven Cost $2,031 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 14 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
Multi-Purpose, Metal
Shop Hall, NE Arctic
Entry, W Phys Ed
Arctic Entry, E3
Arctic Entry, West
PE Hall, Gym
Hallway, 170
Hallway, Elementary
Hall
12 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 12 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $132 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $259
Breakeven Cost $1,578 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 12 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 102, Above 143
(Storage), AHU F3
4 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 100W with
Manual Switching
Replace with 4 FLUOR CFL,
Spiral 20 W
Installation Cost $50 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $86
Breakeven Cost $532 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 11 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
Crawlspace,
Elementary
Crawlspace
104 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 75W with
Manual Switching
Replace with 104 FLUOR CFL,
Spiral 20 W
Installation Cost $1,040 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $1,209
Breakeven Cost $7,356 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 7.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
23
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
103, 104, 105, 106,
107, 108, 111, 112,
113, 120, 121, 122,
125, 130, 136, 156,
160, 162, 164, 166,
167, 169
243 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 243 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $2,010 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $2,229
Breakeven Cost $13,558 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 6.7 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 AHU F6 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 60W with Manual
Switching
Replace with FLUOR CFL,
Spiral 20 W
Installation Cost $10 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $11
Breakeven Cost $66 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 6.6 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
112, Multi-Purpose,
West Wing Hallway,
East PE Hallway,
Elementary Hall
83 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 83 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $915 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 15 Energy Savings (/yr.) $381
Breakeven Cost $4,287 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 4.7 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 133, 135, 137, 153
6 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
(2) Instant StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with 6 FLUOR (4) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $165 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $121
Breakeven Cost $737 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 4.5 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 180S, 180 Mezz.,
Gym
28 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 28 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $462 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $326
Breakeven Cost $2,020 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 4.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
24
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 153B, 180S, Gym,
Gym Hallway
21 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 21 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $347 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $245
Breakeven Cost $1,515 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 4.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 135, 137, E2
7 FLUOR (3) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
(2) Instant StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with 7 FLUOR (3) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $154 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $109
Breakeven Cost $665 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 4.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 102, 284 2 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 75W with
Manual Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR CFL,
Spiral 20 W
Installation Cost $20 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $12
Breakeven Cost $73 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.7 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 189, 193 4 FLUOR (4) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard
Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with 4 FLUOR (4) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $110 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $64
Breakeven Cost $391 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.6 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 160, 186 8 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 8 FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $132 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $73
Breakeven Cost $446 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 170, Multi Purpose 17 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 17 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $281 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $156
Breakeven Cost $949 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
25
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 102, 190 18 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 18 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $300 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $165
Breakeven Cost $1,004 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 West PE Hall,
Elementary Hall
FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Instant
StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $11 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $5
Breakeven Cost $28 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 2.5 Simple Payback (yr.) 2
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 112, 175 5 INCAN A Lamp, Halogen 60W with
Manual Switching
Replace with 5 FLUOR CFL,
Spiral 20 W
Installation Cost $50 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $17
Breakeven Cost $103 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 2.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 3
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Wood Shop
9 FLUOR (4) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
(2) Instant StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with 9 FLUOR (4) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $250 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $61
Breakeven Cost $369 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.5 Simple Payback (yr.) 4
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 142, 143
76 FLUOR (3) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
(2) Instant StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with 76 FLUOR (3) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $1,672 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $335
Breakeven Cost $2,075 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.2 Simple Payback (yr.) 5
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 175, 177 2 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $22 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $4
Breakeven Cost $24 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
26
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 170C, 183, 284 43 FLUOR T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard
Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with 43 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $2,128 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $358
Breakeven Cost $2,217 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.0 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Above Stage 21 FLUOR (2) T12 4' F40T12 40W
Standard Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with 21 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $1,850 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $295
Breakeven Cost $1,826 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.0 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
101, 109, 110, 128,
130S, 141, 144,
158, 170A
13 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 13 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $215 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $34
Breakeven Cost $209 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.0 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 180R Mezz., 185 2 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $33 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $5
Breakeven Cost $31 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.9 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 180R Mezz. 4 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 4 FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $66 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $10
Breakeven Cost $62 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.9 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 170B, AHU F5
Stairwell
2 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $22 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $3
Breakeven Cost $20 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.9 Simple Payback (yr.) 7
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
27
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Pool Pump Room FLUOR (2) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard
Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $88 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $11
Breakeven Cost $67 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.8 Simple Payback (yr.) 8
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Lounge, 180R 14 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 14 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $231 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $29
Breakeven Cost $173 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.8 Simple Payback (yr.) 8
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 171 2 FLUOR (3) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR (3) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $44 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $3
Breakeven Cost $19 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 14
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 123 Restroom FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard Instant
StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $11 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $1
Breakeven Cost $4 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 17
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 123, 171M, 180R 9 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 9 FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $150 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $9
Breakeven Cost $56 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.4 Simple Payback (yr.) 16
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 Lounge, 125, 171m 6 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 6 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $66 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $3
Breakeven Cost $19 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 22
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
28
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 141, 145, 154 3 FLUOR T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 3 FLUOR T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $33 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $2
Breakeven Cost $9 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 22
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 180 Mezz. FLUOR (2) T12 4' F40T12 40W Standard
Magnetic with Manual Switching
Replace with FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $66 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $3
Breakeven Cost $17 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 24
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4 140
2 FLUOR (3) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
(2) Instant StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with 2 FLUOR (3) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $44 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $1
Breakeven Cost $6 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 50
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
127, 150, 151, 152,
180 Mezz., Wood
Shop Mezz., Metal
Shop Mezz.
17 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 17 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $281 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $4
Breakeven Cost $27 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 64
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
4
126, 157, 174, 173,
175, 177, AHU F5
Stairwell
9 FLUOR (2) T8 4' F32T8 32W Standard
Instant StdElectronic with Manual Switching
Replace with 9 FLUOR (2) T8 4'
F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
Installation Cost $150 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $2
Breakeven Cost $15 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 0.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 64
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
29
A.2.2 Other Electrical Loads
The school is equipped with several refrigerators and other electrical loads that are needed for
the operation of the school. Refrigerators use a significant amount of electricity and
consolidating the contents of these refrigerators and shutting down a few of them will save
energy. Ensuring that other electrical loads such as computers and office equipment are shut
down after school hours will also save energy.
Installing a timer for the pool water circulation pump to limit its operation to 12 hours per day will
significantly decrease energy usage associated with operating a pool.
A.3 Building Envelope: Recommendations for change
A.3.1 Exterior Walls
No EEMs are recommended in this category. It is not cost effective at this time to increase the
insulation value of the walls.
A.3.2 Foundation and/or Crawlspace
Increasing the insulation value of the crawlspace by adding encapsulated fiberglass batt
insulation to the perimeter is a cost effective way to save energy.
A.3.3 Roofing and Ceiling
No EEMs are recommended in this category. It is not cost effective at this time to increase the
insulation value of the ceiling.
A.3.4 Windows
No EEMs are recommended in this category. It is not cost effective at this time to replace the
windows with better insulated windows.
A.3.5 Doors
No EEMs are recommended in this category. It is not cost effective at this time to replace the
doors with better insulated doors.
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
1 Pool Pump Pool Pump constantly running Install timer to decrease on time
of pump
Installation Cost $2,000 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $5,509
Breakeven Cost $33,514 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 17 Simple Payback (yr.) 0
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
6
On- or Below-Grade
Floor, Perimeter:
Perimeter
Insulation for 0' to 2' Perimeter: None
Insulation for 2' to 4' Perimeter: None
Modeled R-Value: 6.7
Install R-30 Encapsulated
Fiberglass Batts on the
Perimeter 4 feet of the Crawl
Space Floor.
Installation Cost $26,666 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 30 Energy Savings (/yr.) $2,593
Breakeven Cost $61,233 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 2.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 10
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
30
A.4 Building Heating System / Air Conditioning
A.4.1 Heating and Heat Distribution
Energy savings can be achieved by replacing fan motors with more efficient motors and
installing variable speed drives and demand control ventilation using carbon dioxide sensors.
Replacing circulation pumps with variable speed pumps will also decrease electrical usage
associated with heating.
A.4.2 Air Conditioning
The building is not equipped with an air conditioning system.
A.4.3 Ventilation
Savings can be achieved in this school by repairing outside air dampers for the air handling
units and controlling the amount of outside air brought into the building. The savings presented
here is conservative and would be higher with a detailed analysis that comes from a level III
Audit. Installing a control system that limits the amount of outside air to the ASHRAE standard
minimum will present the most savings in this area. Limiting the relief fan in the pool to operate
only during the occupied period and ensuring that the pool is covered at all other times will
greatly decrease the energy needed to heat the pool room. Hiring a mechanical engineer to
assess the ventilation system and then make the necessary repairs will be needed for a more
exact cost and energy savings.
A.4.4 Air Changes and Air Tightening
No EEMs are recommended in this area because of the difficulty of quantifying the amount of
leaking air and the savings. However, by using a blower door to depressurize the building and
an infra-red camera, the location of significant air leaks can be determined so they can be
repaired.
Rank Recommendation
5 replace pumps with variable speed pump, replace selected motors with more efficient motors
Installation Cost $30,500 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 20 Energy Savings (/yr.) $7,797
Breakeven Cost $108,164 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.5 Simple Payback (yr.) 4
Rank Recommendation
2 repair outside air dampers, install demand control ventilation, shut off pool relief at night
Installation Cost $25,000 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 15 Energy Savings (/yr.) $30,864
Breakeven Cost $411,430 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 17 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
31
Appendix B Energy Efficiency Measures that are NOT Recommended
As indicated in other sections of the report, a number of potential EEMs were identified that
were determined to be NOT cost effective by the AkWarm model. These EEMs are not
currently recommended on the basis of energy savings alone because each may only save a
small amount of energy, have a high capital cost, or be expensive to install. While each of
these EEMs is not cost effective at this time, future changes in building use such as longer
operating hours, higher energy prices, new fixtures or hardware on the market, and decreases
in installation effort may make any of these EEMs cost effective in the future. These potential
EEMs should be reviewed periodically to identify any changes to these factors that would
warrant re-evaluation.
Although these upgrades are not currently cost effective on an energy cost basis, the fixtures,
hardware, controls, or operational changes described in these EEMs should be considered
when replacing an existing fixture or unit for other reasons. For example, replacing an existing
window with a triple-pane window may not be cost effective based only on energy use, but if a
window is going to be replaced for some other reason, then the basis for a decision is only the
incremental cost of upgrading from a less efficient replacement window to a more efficient
replacement window. That incremental cost difference will have a significantly shorter payback,
especially since the installation costs are likely to be the same for both units.
The following measures were not found to be cost-effective:
Rank Feature/Location Improvement Description
Annual
Energy
Savings
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio, SIR
Simple
Payback
(Years)
7 Garage Door: Garage
OHD
Add R-5 insulating blanket to
garage door $42 $634 0.89 15
8 Window/Skylight: Dbl
Alum Other >3/8
Install single pane storm
window on exterior $18 $699 0.45 39
9 Exterior Door: Metal
Quarter Lite
Remove existing door and
install standard pre-hung U-
0.16 insulated door, including
hardware.
$171 $10,167 0.40 60
10 Exterior Door: Wood
Remove existing door and
install standard pre-hung U-
0.16 insulated door, including
hardware.
$15 $952 0.37 65
11 Above-Grade Wall:
Original
Install R-30 rigid foam board
to exterior and cover with T1-
11 siding or equivalent.
$4,948 $388,432 0.30 79
12 Above-Grade Wall:
Additions
Install R-30 rigid foam board
to exterior and cover with T1-
11 siding or equivalent.
$899 $96,944 0.22 108
13
Window/Skylight: Dbl
Wd/Vn >3/8 Argon
Other
Install single pane storm
window on exterior $416 $37,457 0.19 90
14
Window/Skylight: Dbl
Wd/Vn Argon South
>3/8
Install single pane storm
window on exterior $369 $44,770 0.14 120
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
32
15 Exterior Door: Metal
Remove existing door and
install standard pre-hung U-
0.16 insulated door, including
hardware.
$5 $909 0.14 170
16
Window/Skylight: Dbl
Wd/Vn Lowe >3/8
Argon Other
Install single pane storm
window on exterior $26 $3,720 0.12 140
17 Exterior Door:
Fiberglass
Remove existing door and
install standard pre-hung U-
0.16 insulated door, including
hardware.
$0 $1,947 0.00 1,000
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
33
Appendix C Significant Equipment List
HVAC Equipment
Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Fuel Type Estimated
Efficiency Notes
Boiler Weil McLain 688 #2 Fuel Oil 80% Two units
Unit Heater Trane - Electric - 1/10 HP
Unit Heater Modine H547501 Electric - 1/10 HP, Broken
Unit Heater Trane - Electric - 1/10 HP, Broken
Cabinet Heater Trane M46H002 Electric - 1/6 HP, Four units
Circulation pump Grundfos UMC 50-80 Electric - 1/2 HP, Two units
Circulation pump Grundfos UP 50-160 Electric - 1 1/2 HP, Three units
Circulation pump Grundfos UP 43-75 Electric - 1/6 HP
Circulation pump Grundfos UP 40-75 Electric - 1/6 HP
F1 Motor Dayton 5N306 Electric 90% 3 HP
F2 Motor Baldor EM3211T Electric 86.5% 3 HP
F3 Motor Gould - Electric 84% 2 HP
F4 Main supply Gould 6338275-01 Electric 88% 5 HP
F4 Secondary Supply Magnatek 10-349221-01 Electric 84% 1 1/2 HP
F4 Exhaust Reliance 3414370AP Electric - 2 HP
F5 Motor Pace A9-FC-SI Electric 83% 1 HP
F5 Circ Pump Grundfos UP 25-64 Electric - 1/12 HP
F6 Supply Dayton 5W306 Electric - 3 HP
F6 Exhaust Pace CRE-27AF Electric - 2 HP
F6 Circ Pump Grundfos UP 43-75 Electric - 1/6 HP
F6 Circ Pump Grundfos UP 43-75 Electric - 1/6 HP
Circulation pump Grundfos UP 40-80 Electric - -
Circulation pump Grundfos UPS 76-99 Electric - 1/6 HP
Exhaust Hood - 41000-C Electric - Three units
Ventilation Fans Pace DD-350G Electric - Thirteen units
Kitchen exhaust fan Air Tech VN2496 Electric - -
Kitchen makeup air fan Greenhexk SQB-18-S Electric - 1/2 HP
Locker room fans Pace CRE-18AF Electric - -
Mechanical room exhaust
fan AO Smith DA2E092N Electric - -
Pool exhaust fan Pace CPE-27AF Electric - 2 HP
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
34
Lighting
Location Lighting Type Bulb Type Quantity KWH/YR Cost/YR
103, 104, 105, 106,
107, 108, 111, 112,
113, 120, 121, 122,
125, 130, 136, 156,
160, 162, 164, 166,
167, 169
Fluorescent T8 486 26,000 $ 13,520
Exterior Wall/Ceiling
Mount CFL Fluorescent CFL 56 10,309 5,361
120, 190, East Arctic
Entry, SE Arctic Entry,
West Wind Hallway
Fluorescent T8 20 5,044 2,623
112, Multi-Purpose,
West Wing Hallway,
East PE Hallway,
Elementary Hall
Fluorescent T8 83 4,630 2,408
Crawlspace,
Elementary
Crawlspace
Incandescent A-lamp 104 4,029 2,095
Multi-Purpose, Metal
Shop Hall, NE Arctic
Entry, W Phys Ed
Arctic Entry, E3 Arctic
Entry, West PE Hall,
Gym Hallway, 170
Hallway, Elementary
Hall
Fluorescent T8 12 3,155 1,641
Stage Light Incandescent - - 3,099 1,611
180S, 180 Mezz.,
Gym Fluorescent T8 56 2,996 1,558
142, 143 Fluorescent T8 228 2,749 1,429
153B, 180S, Gym,
Gym Hallway Fluorescent T8 42 2,247 1,168
Pool HPS 400 W 8 2,213 1,151
102, 190 Fluorescent T8 36 1,926 1,002
170, Multi-Purpose Fluorescent T8 34 1,819 946
East PE Arctic Entry,
West Wing Hallway,
East PE Hallway
Fluorescent T12 3 1,446 752
133, 135, 137, 153 Fluorescent T8 24 1,284 668
170C, 183, 284 Fluorescent T12 43 1,221 635
135, 137, E2 Fluorescent T8 21 1,139 592
Above Stage Fluorescent T12 42 1,061 552
Exit Signs LED 4 W module 11 1,054 548
153 Fluorescent T8 4 1,009 525
Wood Shop Fluorescent T8 4 1,009 525
160, 186 Fluorescent T8 16 856 445
Wood Shop Fluorescent T8 36 642 334
Gym, E1 Fluorescent T8 2 526 274
170 Fluorescent T8 2 504 262
Exterior Ceiling Mount HPS 100 W 1 496 258
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
35
Lounge, 180R Fluorescent T8 28 333 173
101, 109, 110, 128,
130S, 141, 144, 158,
170A
Fluorescent T8 26 309 161
111 Fluorescent T12 3 307 160
189, 193 Fluorescent T12 16 303 158
105 Grow Lamp Fluorescent 30 W 2 263 137
102, Above 143
(Storage), AHU F3 Incandescent A-lamp 4 207 108
140.5, Mechanical, F5
Room, AHU 2,
Crawlspace
Fluorescent CFL 37 153 80
180R Mezz. Fluorescent T8 8 119 62
123, 171M, 180R Fluorescent T8 18 107 56
112, 175 Incandescent A-lamp 5 62 32
180R Mezz., 185 Fluorescent T8 4 59 31
West PE Hall,
Elementary Hall Fluorescent T8 1 56 29
Elementary
Crawlspace Fluorescent CFL 4 54 28
Pool Pump Room Fluorescent T12 2 51 27
133 Fluorescent CFL 1 48 25
127, 150, 151, 152,
180 Mezz., Wood
Shop Mezz., Metal
Shop Mezz.
Fluorescent T8 34 40 21
175, 177 Fluorescent T8 2 37 19
Lounge, 125, 171m Fluorescent T8 6 37 19
171 Fluorescent T8 6 35 18
102, 284 Incandescent A-lamp 2 31 16
170B, AHU F5
Stairwell Fluorescent T8 2 31 16
AHU F6 Incandescent A-lamp 1 31 16
126, 157, 174, 173,
175, 177, AHU F5
Stairwell
Fluorescent T8 18 21 11
141, 145, 154 Fluorescent T8 3 19 10
111, 284 Fluorescent CFL 4 17 9
180 Mezz. Fluorescent T12 2 10 5
140 Fluorescent T8 6 7 4
123 Restroom Fluorescent T8 1 6 3
Energy Consumption calculated by AkWarm based on wattage, schedule and a $ 0.52 per KWH electric rate.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
36
Plug Loads
Equipment Location Manufacturer KWH/YR Cost/YR
Pool Pump Pool room Emerson 26,920 $ 13,998
Walk in Freezer Kitchen Copeland/Emerson 10,446 5,432
Server Server - 8,415 4,376
Full size refrigerators School Varies 5,950 3,094
Microwaves School Varies 3,161 1,644
Food Warmer Kitchen Duke 3,099 1,611
Walk in Refrigerator Kitchen Copeland/Emerson 2,887 1,501
Dish washer Kitchen Hobart 2,686 1,397
Misc. Shop tool Shop Varies 1,808 940
Air compressor Metal shop Gould 1,711 890
Electric space heaters Classrooms - 1,550 806
Computer towers Classrooms - 1,455 757
Hand dryers Bathrooms - 1,426 742
Mini fridges Classrooms - 1,250 650
Projectors Classrooms - 1,240 645
Aquarium Classrooms - 1,096 570
Welders Shop - 1,074 558
Water coolers Offices - 1,000 520
Large copier Offices Workcenter 793 412
Hot water maker Classrooms - 749 389
Computer monitors Classrooms - 711 370
Laptops Classrooms - 579 301
Energy Consumption calculated by AkWarm based on wattage, schedule and a $ 0.52 per KWH electric rate.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
37
Appendix D Local Utility Rate Structure
The information in this section was provided directly from the local utility or gathered from the
local utility’s publicly available information at the time of the audit. All language used in this
section was provided by the local utility and believed to be current at the time of the audit.
Energy use terms, specific fees, and other specific information are subject to change. Updated
rate structure information should be gathered from the utility during future discussion of rates,
rate structures and utility pricing agreements.
TDX Power Rate Structure:
RATE TYPE(EX GS-1 General Service)
Customer Charge $23.24
Energy Charge $0.2217 / kWh
Demand Charge $9.83 / kW
COPA $0.3182 / kWh
RCC $0.0004919 / kWh
Effective Rate $0.5721 / kWh
***The effective rate is all of the charges totaled together and divided by the kilowatt hour used.
Customer Charge
A flat fee that covers costs for meter reading, billing and customer service.
Energy Charge (kWh charge)
This charge is multiplied by the number of kilowatt-hours (kWh) used in a monthly billing period.
It covers the costs to maintain power plants and substations, interest on loans as well as wires,
power poles and transformers.
Demand Charge.
Amount multiplied by the peak kW used in a month.
COPA
This charge is based on a combination of forecasted and actual power costs. The monthly
charge allows Golden Valley to pass on increases and decreases in fuel and energy purchases
to our members. It is calculated quarterly and multiplied by the kilowatt-hours used each month.
RCC
This charge of .0004919 per kWh is set by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). Since
November 1, 1992, the Regulatory Commission of Alaska has been funded by a Regulatory
Charge to the utilities it regulates rather than through the State general fund. The charge,
labeled "Regulatory Cost Charge." on your bill, is set by the RCA, and applies to all retail
kilowatt-hours sold by regulated electric utilities in Alaska.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
38
Appendix E Analysis Methodology
Data collected was processed using AkWarm energy use software to estimate current energy
consumption by end usage and calculate energy savings for each of the proposed energy
efficiency measures (EEMs). In addition, separate analysis may have been conducted to
evaluate EEMs that AkWarm cannot effectively model to evaluate potential reductions in annual
energy consumption. Analyses were conducted under the direct supervision of a Certified
Energy Auditor, Certified Energy Manager, or a Professional Engineer.
EEMs are evaluated based on building use, maintenance and processes, local climate
conditions, building construction type, function, operational schedule and existing conditions.
Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering
estimations. Each model created in AkWarm is carefully compared to existing utility usage
obtained from utility bills. The AkWarm analysis provides a number of tools for assessing the
cost effectiveness of various improvement options. The primary assessment value used in this
audit report is the Savings/Investment Ratio (SIR). The SIR is a method of cost analysis that
compares the total cost savings through reduced energy consumption to the total cost of a
project over its assumed lifespan, including both the construction cost and ongoing maintenance
and operating costs. Other measurement methods include Simple Payback, which is defined as
the length of time it takes for the savings to equal the total installed cost and Breakeven Cost,
which is defined as the highest cost that would yield a Savings/Investment Ratio of one.
EEMs are recommended by AkWarm in order of cost-effectiveness. AkWarm first calculates
individual SIRs for each EEM, and then ranks the EEMs by SIR, with higher SIRs at the top of
the list. An individual EEM must have a SIR greater than or equal to one in order to be
recommended by AkWarm. Next AkWarm modifies the building model to include the installation
of the first EEM and then re-simulates the energy use. Then the remaining EEMs are re-
evaluated and ranked again. AkWarm goes through this iterative process until all suggested
EEMs have been evaluated.
Under this iterative review process, the savings for each recommended EEM is calculated
based on the implementation of the other, more cost effective EEMs first. Therefore, the
implementation of one EEM affects the savings of other EEMs that are recommended later.
The savings from any one individual EEM may be relatively higher if the individual EEM is
implemented without the other recommended EEMs. For example, implementing a reduced
operating schedule for inefficient lighting may result in relatively higher savings than
implementing the same reduced operating schedule for newly installed lighting that is more
efficient. If multiple EEMs are recommended, AkWarm calculates a combined savings.
Inclusion of recommendations for energy savings outside the capability of AkWarm will impact
the actual savings from the AkWarm projections. This will almost certainly result in lower
energy savings and monetary savings from AkWarm recommendations. The reality is that only
so much energy is consumed in a building. Energy savings from one EEM reduces the amount
of energy that can be saved from additional EEMs. For example, installation of a lower wattage
light bulb does not save energy or money if the bulb is never turned on because of a schedule
or operational change at the facility.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
39
Appendix F Audit Limitations
The results of this audit are dependent on the input data provided and can only act as an
approximation. In some instances, several EEMs or installation methods may achieve the
identified potential savings. Actual savings will depend on the EEM selected, the price of
energy, and the final installation and implementation methodology. Competent tradesmen and
professional engineers may be required to design, install, or otherwise implement some of the
recommended EEMs. This document is an energy use audit report and is not intended as a
final design document, operation, and maintenance manual, or to take the place of any
document provided by a manufacturer or installer of any device described in this report.
Cost savings are calculated based on estimated initial costs for each EEM. Estimated costs
include labor and equipment for the full up-front investment required to implement the EEM.
The listed installation costs within the report are conceptual budgetary estimates and should not
be used as design estimates. The estimated costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry
publications, local contractors and equipment suppliers, and the professional judgment of the
CEA writing the report and based on the conditions at the time of the audit.
Cost and energy savings are approximations and are not guaranteed.
Additional significant energy savings can usually be found with more detailed auditing
techniques that include actual measurements of electrical use, temperatures in the building and
HVAC ductwork, intake and exhaust temperatures, motor runtime and scheduling, and infrared,
air leakage to name just a few. Implementation of these techniques is the difference between a
Level III Energy Audit and the Level II Audit that has been conducted.
Disclaimer: "This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor
any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability
or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus,
product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned
rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name,
trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The
views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the
United States Government or any agency thereof."
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
40
Appendix G References
Although not all documents listed below are specifically referenced in this report, each contains
information and insights considered valuable to most buildings.
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development; Education Support Services/Facilities.
(1999). Alaska School Facilities Preventative Maintenance Handbook. Juneau, AK:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development.
Alaska Housing Finance Corportation. (2010). Retrofit Energy Assessment for Loans. AHFC.
ASHRAE. (1997). 1997 ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
ASHRAE. (2007). ASHRAE Standard 105-2007 Expressing and Comparing Building Energy
Performance. Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE. (2007). ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 Energy Standards for buildings Except Low-
Rise Residential Buildings. Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE. (2010). ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2010 Ventilaton for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE. (2010). ASHRAE Standard 62.2-2010 Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in
Low Rise Residential Buildings. Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE RP-669 and SP-56. (2004). Procedures for Commercial Building Energy Audits.
Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
Coad, W. J. (1982). Energy Engineering and Management for Building Systems. Scarborough,
Ontario, Canada: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Daley, D. T. (2008). The Little Black Book of Reliability Management. New York, NY: Industrial
Press, Inc.
Federal Energy Management Program. (2004, March 3). Demand Controlled Ventilation Using
CO2 Sensors. Retrieved 2011, from US DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy:
http://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/fta_co2.pdf
Federal Energy Management Program. (2006, April 26). Low-Energy Building Design
Guidelines. Retrieved 2011, from Department of Energy; Federal Energy Management
Program: http://www.eren.doe.gov/femp/
Institute, E. a. (2004). Variable Speed Pumping: A Guide to Successful Applications. Oxford,
UK: Elsevier Advanced Technology.
International Code Council. (2009). International Energy Conservation Code. Country Club Hills,
IL: International Code Council, Inc.
Leach, M., Lobato, C., Hirsch, A., Pless, S., & Torcellini, P. (2010, September). Technical
Support Document: Strategies for 50% Energy Savings in Large Office Buildings.
Retrieved 2011, from National Renewable Energy Laboratory:
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/49213.pdf
Thumann, P.E., C.E.M., A., Younger, C.E.M., W. J., & Niehus, P.E., C.E.M., T. (2010).
Handbook of Energy Audits Eighth Edition. Lilburn, GA: The Fairmont Press, Inc.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2006). Commercial Building Energy Consumption
Survey (CBECS). Retrieved 2011, from Energy Information Administration:
http://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
41
Appendix H Typical Energy Use and Cost – Fairbanks and Anchorage
This report provides data on typical energy costs and use on selected building in Fairbanks and
Anchorage, Alaska for comparative purposes only. The values provided by the US Energy
Information Administration CBECS study included a broader range of building types for the
Continental U.S. are not necessarily good comparatives for buildings and conditions in Alaska.
An assortment of values from CBECS may be found in Appendix I.
The Alaska data described in this report came from a benchmarking study NORTECH and other
Technical Services Providers (TSPs) completed on publicly owned buildings in Alaska under
contract with AHFC. This study acquired actual utility data for municipal buildings and schools
in Alaska for the two recent full years. The utility data included costs and quantities including
fuel oil, electricity, propane, wood, steam, and all other energy source usage. This resulted in a
database of approximately 900 buildings. During the course of the benchmarking study, the
comparisons made to the CBECS data appeared to be inappropriate for various reasons.
Therefore, this energy use audit report references the average energy use and energy cost of
Anchorage and Fairbanks buildings as described below.
The Alaska benchmarking data was evaluated in order to find valid comparison data. Buildings
with major energy use information missing were eliminated from the data pool. After detailed
scrutiny of the data, the most complete information was provided to NORTECH by the
Fairbanks North Star Borough School District (FNSBSD) and the Anchorage School District
(ASD). The data sets from these two sources included both the actual educational facilities as
well as the district administrative buildings and these are grouped together in this report as
Fairbanks and Anchorage schools. These two sources of information, being the most complete
and reasonable in-state information, have been used to identify an average annual energy
usage for Fairbanks and for Anchorage in order to provide a comparison for other facilities in
Alaska.
Several factors may limit the comparison of a specific facility to these regional indicators. In
Fairbanks, the FNSBSD generally uses number two fuel oil for heating needs and electricity is
provided by Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA). GVEA produces electricity from a coal
fired generation plant with additional oil generation upon demand. A few of the FNSBSD
buildings in this selection utilize district steam and hot water. The FNSBSD has recently (the
last ten years) invested significantly in envelope and other efficiency upgrades to reduce their
operating costs. Therefore a reader should be aware that this selection of Fairbanks buildings
has energy use at or below average for the entire Alaska benchmarking database.
Heating in Anchorage is through natural gas from the nearby natural gas fields. Electricity is
also provided using natural gas. As the source is nearby and the infrastructure for delivery is in
place, energy costs are relatively low in the area. As a result, the ASD buildings have lower
energy costs, but higher energy use, than the average for the entire benchmarking database.
These special circumstances should be considered when comparing the typical annual energy
use for particular buildings.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
42
Appendix I Typical Energy Use and Cost – Continental U.S.
Released: Dec 2006
Next CBECS will be conducted in 2007
Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003
All Buildings* Sum of Major Fuel Consumption
Number of
Buildings
(thousand)
Floor
space
(million
square
feet)
Floorspace
per Building
(thousand
square feet)
Total
(trillion
BTU)
per
Building
(million
BTU)
per
Square Foot
(thousand
BTU)
per
Worker
(million
BTU)
All Buildings* 4,645 64,783 13.9 5,820 1,253 89.8 79.9
Building Floorspace (Square Feet)
1,001 to 5,000 2,552 6,789 2.7 672 263 98.9 67.6
5,001 to 10,000 889 6,585 7.4 516 580 78.3 68.7
10,001 to 25,000 738 11,535 15.6 776 1,052 67.3 72.0
25,001 to 50,000 241 8,668 35.9 673 2,790 77.6 75.8
50,001 to 100,000 129 9,057 70.4 759 5,901 83.8 90.0
100,001 to 200,000 65 9,064 138.8 934 14,300 103.0 80.3
200,001 to 500,000 25 7,176 289.0 725 29,189 101.0 105.3
Over 500,000 7 5,908 896.1 766 116,216 129.7 87.6
Principal Building Activity
Education 386 9,874 25.6 820 2,125 83.1 65.7
Food Sales 226 1,255 5.6 251 1,110 199.7 175.2
Food Service 297 1,654 5.6 427 1,436 258.3 136.5
Health Care 129 3,163 24.6 594 4,612 187.7 94.0
Inpatient 8 1,905 241.4 475 60,152 249.2 127.7
Outpatient 121 1,258 10.4 119 985 94.6 45.8
Lodging 142 5,096 35.8 510 3,578 100.0 207.5
Retail (Other Than Mall) 443 4,317 9.7 319 720 73.9 92.1
Office 824 12,208 14.8 1,134 1,376 92.9 40.3
Public Assembly 277 3,939 14.2 370 1,338 93.9 154.5
Public Order and Safety 71 1,090 15.5 126 1,791 115.8 93.7
Religious Worship 370 3,754 10.1 163 440 43.5 95.6
Service 622 4,050 6.5 312 501 77.0 85.0
Warehouse and Storage 597 10,078 16.9 456 764 45.2 104.3
Other 79 1,738 21.9 286 3,600 164.4 157.1
Vacant 182 2,567 14.1 54 294 20.9 832.1
This report references the Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), published by the U.S.
Energy Information Administration in 2006. Initially this report was expected to compare the annual energy
consumption of the building to average national energy usage as documented below. However, a direct comparison
between one specific building and the groups of buildings outlined below yielded confusing results. Instead, this
report uses a comparative analysis on Fairbanks and Anchorage data as described in Appendix F. An abbreviated
excerpt from CBECS on commercial buildings in the Continental U.S. is below.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
43
Appendix J List of Conversion Factors and Energy Units
1 British Thermal Unit is the energy required to raise one pound of water one degree F°
1 Watt is approximately 3.412 BTU/hr
1 horsepower is approximately 2,544 BTU/hr
1 horsepower is approximately 746 Watts
1 "ton of cooling” is approximately 12,000 BTU/hr, the amount of power required to
melt one short ton of ice in 24 hours
1 Therm = 100,000 BTU
1 KBTU = 1,000 BTU
1 KWH = 3413 BTU
1 KW = 3413 BTU/Hr
1 Boiler HP = 33,400 BTU/Hr
1 Pound Steam = approximately 1000 BTU
1 CCF of natural gas = approximately 1 Therm
1 inch H2O = 250 Pascal (Pa) = 0.443 pounds/square inch (psi)
1 atmosphere (atm) = 10,1000 Pascal (Pa)
BTU British Thermal Unit
CCF 100 Cubic Feet
CFM Cubic Feet per Minute
GPM Gallons per minute
HP Horsepower
Hz Hertz
kg Kilogram (1,000 grams)
kV Kilovolt (1,000 volts)
kVA Kilovolt-Amp
kVAR Kilovolt-Amp Reactive
KW Kilowatt (1,000 watts)
KWH Kilowatt Hour
V Volt
W Watt
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
44
Appendix K List of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions
ACH Air Changes per Hour
AFUE Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency
Air Economizer A duct, damper, and automatic control system that
allows a cooling system to supply outside air to reduce
or eliminate the need for mechanical cooling.
Ambient Temperature Average temperature of the surrounding air
Ballast A device used with an electric discharge lamp to cause
the lamp to start and operate under the proper circuit
conditions of voltage, current, electrode heat, etc.
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CUI Cost Utilization Index
CDD Cooling Degree Days
DDC Direct Digital Control
EEM Energy Efficiency Measure
EER Energy Efficient Ratio
EUI Energy Utilization Index
FLUOR Fluorescent
Grade The finished ground level adjoining a building at the
exterior walls
HDD Heating Degree Days
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning
INCAN Incandescent
NPV Net Present Value
R-value Thermal resistance measured in BTU/Hr-SF-̊F (Higher
value means better insulation)
SCFM Standard Cubic Feet per Minute
Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) Savings over the life of the EEM divided by Investment
capital cost. Savings includes the total discounted dollar
savings considered over the life of the improvement.
Investment in the SIR calculation includes the labor and
materials required to install the measure.
Set Point Target temperature that a control system operates the
heating and cooling system
Simple payback A cost analysis method whereby the investment cost of
an EEM is divided by the first year’s savings of the EEM
to give the number of years required to recover the cost
of the investment.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Sand Point School
Sand Point, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-900 Aleutians Region\50-950 Aleutians East Borough SD\50-953 Sand Point School\Reports\Final\2012.07.09 Final
AHFC Report V2 SDP Sand Point School.Docx
45
Appendix L Building Floor Plan
Copy of AEBSD Sand Point School crisis response plan N