HomeMy WebLinkAboutBIG Delta Public Works 2012-EEENERGY AUDIT – FINAL REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
Richardson Highway
Delta Junction, Alaska
Prepared for:
Mr. Mike Tvenge
2288 Deborah Street
Delta Junction, Alaska
Prepared by:
Douglas Dusek CEA
Jeremy Spargur CEAIT
July 11, 2012
Acknowledgment: “This material is based upon work supported by the Department of
Energy under Award Number DE-EE0000095”
Managing Office
2400 College Road 3105 Lakeshore Dr. Suite 106A 4402 Thane Road
Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 Juneau, Alaska 99801
p. 907.452.5688 p. 907.222.2445 p: 907.586.6813
f. 907.452.5694 f. 907.222.0915 f: 907.586.6819
www.nortechengr.com
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, HEALTH & SAFETY
Anch: 3105 Lakeshore Dr. Ste 106A, 99517 907.222.2445 Fax: 222.0915
Fairbanks: 2400 College Road, 99709 907.452.5688 Fax: 452.5694
Juneau: 4402 Thane Road, 99801 907.586.6813 Fax: 586.6819
info@nortechengr.com www.nortechengr.com
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1
2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Building Use, Occupancy, Schedules and Description .......................................... 3
2.1.1 Building Use ................................................................................................. 3
2.1.2 Building Occupancy and Schedules ............................................................. 3
2.1.3 Building Description ...................................................................................... 3
2.2 Benchmarking ....................................................................................................... 6
2.2.1 Energy Utilization Index of 2010 ................................................................ 7
2.2.2 Cost Utilization Index of 2010 .................................................................... 8
2.2.3 Seasonal Energy Use Patterns .................................................................. 9
2.2.4 Future Energy Monitoring ........................................................................ 10
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND MODELING RESULTS .............................................. 11
3.1 Understanding How AkWarm Models Energy Consumption ............................... 12
3.1.1 AkWarm Calculated Savings for the Building Name ................................ 13
3.1.2 AkWarm Projected Energy Costs after Modifications .............................. 14
3.2 Energy Efficiency Measures Calculated Outside AkWarm .................................. 15
4.0 BUILDING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) .............................................. 16
4.1 Operations and Maintenance .............................................................................. 16
No EEMs are recommended in this category. ................................................................. 21
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC
Report BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
ii
APPENDICES
Appendix A Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures ........................................... 18
Appendix B Energy Efficiency Measures that are NOT Recommended ..................... 22
Appendix C Significant Equipment List ....................................................................... 24
Appendix D Local Utility Rate Structure ...................................................................... 25
Appendix E Analysis Methods .................................................................................... 27
Appendix F Audit Limitations ...................................................................................... 28
Appendix G References .............................................................................................. 29
Appendix H Typical Energy Use and Cost – Fairbanks and Anchorage ..................... 30
Appendix I Typical Energy Use and Cost – Continental U.S. .................................... 31
Appendix J List of Conversion Factors and Energy Units .......................................... 32
Appendix K List of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions .................................... 33
Appendix L Building Floor Plan .................................................................................. 34
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NORTECH has completed an ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit of the Public Works Building, a
7,200 square foot facility. The audit began with benchmarking which resulted in a calculation of
the energy consumption per square foot. A site inspection was completed on November 2,
2011 to obtain information about the lighting, heating, ventilation, cooling and other building
energy uses. The existing usage data and current systems were then used to develop a
building energy consumption model using AkWarm.
Once the model was calibrated, a number of Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) were
developed from review of the data and observations. EEMs were evaluated and ranked on the
basis of both energy savings and cost using a Savings/Investment Ratio (SIR). While these
modeling techniques were successful in verifying that many of the EEMs would save energy,
not all of the identified EEMs were considered cost effective based on the hardware, installation,
and energy costs at the time of this audit.
While the need for a major retrofit can typically be identified by an energy audit, upgrading
specific systems often requires collecting additional data and engineering and design efforts that
are beyond the scope of the Level II energy audit. The necessity and amount of design effort
and cost will vary depending on the scope of the specific EEMs planned and the sophistication
and capability of the entire design team, including the building owners and operators. During
the budgeting process for any major retrofit identified in this report, the building owner should
add administrative and supplemental design costs to cover the individual needs of their own
organization and the overall retrofit project.
The following table, from AkWarm, is a summary of the recommended EEMs for the Public
Works Building. Additional discussion of the modeling process can be found in Section 3.
Details of each individual EEM can be found in Appendix A of this report. A summary of EEMs
that were evaluated but are not currently recommended is located in in Appendix B.
PRIORITY LIST – ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES (EEMs)
Rank Feature/
Location Improvement Description
Estimated
Annual
Energy
Savings
Estimated
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio
Simple
Payback
(Years)
1
Setback
Thermostat:
Entire Building
Implement a Heating
Temperature Unoccupied
Setback to 60.0 deg F for the
Entire Building space.
$3,025 $2,000 20 0.7
2 Garage Door:
Wood
Add R-5 insulating blanket to
garage door $694 $2,180 4.3 3.1
3 Garage Door:
Garage
Add R-5 insulating blanket to
garage door $75 $323 3.1 4.3
4 HVAC And DHW
Clean, tune and repair boiler.
Replace circ pump. Add Vent
Damper.
$612 $3,000 1.9 4.9
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
2
PRIORITY LIST – ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES (EEMs)
Rank Feature/
Location Improvement Description
Estimated
Annual
Energy
Savings
Estimated
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio
Simple
Payback
(Years)
5
Above-Grade
Wall: Original AG
Wall
Install R-30 rigid foam board to
exterior and cover with T1-11
siding or equivalent.
$1,069 $22,763 1.1 21
6 Lighting: Outdoor Replace with 2 LED 20W
Module StdElectronic $262 $1,500 1.1 5.7
TOTAL, cost-effective measures $5,737 $31,766 2.6 5.5
Serious consideration should be given to replacing the building due to the high costs of the
recommended EEMs. A new building that serves the same purpose as the Public Works
building is estimated to cost approximately $500,000 and will be dramatically more energy
efficient and cost effective to operate.
Another recommendation would be to make the necessary building repairs to return the building
to decent operating condition. The building is leaky around doors and windows and there are
several locations with holes that go all the way through the wall. A drafty building is extremely
expensive to heat during the winter.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
3
2.0 INTRODUCTION
NORTECH contracted with the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation to perform an ASHRAE
Level II Energy Audits for publically owned buildings in Alaska. This report presents the findings
of the utility benchmarking, modeling analysis, and the recommended building modifications,
and building use changes that are expected to save energy and money.
The report is organized into sections covering:
description of the facility,
the building’s historic energy usage (benchmarking),
estimating energy use through energy use modeling,
evaluation of potential energy efficiency or efficiency improvements, and
recommendations for energy efficiency with estimates of the costs and savings.
2.1 Building Use, Occupancy, Schedules and Description
2.1.1 Building Use
This building is used in several different ways
The north end is an office space used as an adult learning center (GED).
The center is a four bay garage used as the public works area.
The south is office and garage space used by the rescue squad.
2.1.2 Building Occupancy and Schedules
The GED portion of the building is used once a week for a few hours. The public works portion
has a single employee that works 8 am to 5 pm Monday through Friday but spends most of his
time out of the shop. The rescue squad is occupied by one individual and meetings take place
frequently in the evenings.
2.1.3 Building Description
The original portion of the building is a metal framed structure with fiberglass batt insulation
throughout the walls and ceiling. The addition is constructed of 2x6’s with full batt insulation and
an insulated attic. Both sections sit on an insulated slab on grade foundation. The building has
six wood garage doors, one metal garage door, six insulated metal man doors, and one wood
man door. Double pane vinyl windows are located in the office areas.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
4
Building Envelope
Building Envelope: Walls
Wall Type Description Insulation Notes
Original Walls Metal framed building R-19 fiberglass batt. Damage in several places
Addition Walls 2x6 Framing 16” o.c. R-19 fiberglass batt None
Building Envelope: Floors
Floor Type Description Insulation Notes
On Grade Floor Insulated slab 2” on perimeter None
Building Envelope: Roof
Roof Type Description Insulation Notes
Original Ceiling Metal framed hot roof R-19 fiberglass batt and 2”
spray on foam. Minor insulation damage.
Addition Ceiling Ceiling with Attic R-38 fiberglass batt None
Building Envelope: Doors and Windows
Door and Window Type Description Estimated
R-value Notes
Man Door Insulated Metal 5 None
Man Door Solid Wood 3.7 None
6- Garage Doors Insulated Wood Panel 5 None
1-Garage Door Insulated Metal Clad Door 6.3 None
Windows Double Pane Vinyl 2 None
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
5
Heating and Ventilation Systems
The Public Works building is heated with two separate boilers, boiler one in the GED section
and boiler two in the Rescue Squad. The heat is distributed the following ways from boiler one:
Baseboard fin tubes in the GED section
Ceiling mounted unit heaters in public works
And boiler two in the following ways:
Baseboard fin tubes in the rescue squad office
In-slab heat and unit heaters in the rescue squad garage bays
Air Conditioning System
This building is not equipped with an air conditioning system.
Energy Management
There are no energy management systems in the public works building.
Lighting Systems
The primary lighting source in the office areas are fluorescent fixtures with two T8 (1” diameter,
4’ long) lamps. The garage bays are lit by ceiling mounted fluorescent strip lighting with T12
(1.5” diameter, 8’ long) bulbs. In addition, there are random incandescent bulbs throughout the
building.
Domestic Hot Water
The original portion of the building has hot water provided through a direct loop through boiler
one with no storage tank and does not re-circulate. The rescue squad addition has a fifty gallon
electric water heater.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
6
2.2 Benchmarking
Benchmarking building energy use consists of obtaining and then analyzing two years of energy
bills. The original utility bills are necessary to determine the raw usage, and charges as well as
to evaluate the utility’s rate structure. The metered usage of electrical and natural gas
consumption is measured monthly, but heating oil, propane, wood, and other energy sources
are normally billed upon delivery and provide similar information. During benchmarking,
information is compiled in a way that standardizes the units of energy and creates energy use
and billing rate information statistics for the building on a square foot basis. The objectives of
benchmarking are:
to understand patterns of use,
to understand building operational characteristics,
for comparison with other similar facilities in Alaska and across the country, and
to offer insight in to potential energy savings.
The results of the benchmarking, including the energy use statistics and comparisons to other
areas, are discussed in the following sections.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
7
2.2.1 Energy Utilization Index of 2010
The primary benchmarking statistic is the Energy Utilization Index (EUI). The EUI is calculated
from the utility bills and provides a simple snapshot of the quantity of energy actually used by
the building on a square foot and annual basis. The calculation converts the total energy use
for the year from all sources in the building, such as heating fuel and electrical usage, into
British Thermal Units (BTUs). This total usage is then divided by the number of square feet of
the building. The EUI units are BTUs per square foot per year.
The benchmark analysis found that the Public Works Building has an EUI of 120,000 BTUs per
square foot per year. This is high for a building with no central ventilation system and reflects
the age and condition of the building.
The EUI is useful in comparing this building’s energy use to that of other similar buildings in
Alaska and in the Continental United States. The EUI can be compared to average energy use
in 2003 found in a study by the U.S. Energy Information Administration of commercial buildings
(abbreviated CBECS, 2006). That report found an overall average energy use of about 90,000
BTUs per square foot per year while studying about 6,000 commercial buildings of all sizes,
types, and uses that were located all over the Continental U.S. (see Table C3 in Appendix I).
In a recent and unpublished state-wide benchmarking study sponsored by the Alaska Housing
Finance Corporation, schools in Fairbanks averaged 62,000 BTUs per square foot and schools
in Anchorage averaged 123,000 BTUs per square foot annual energy use. The chart below
shows the Public Works Building relative to these values. These findings are discussed further
in Appendix H.
120,000
62,000
123,000
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
Btu/ Sq. FtAnnual Energy Utilization Index (Total Energy/ SF)
Public Works Fairbanks Anchorage
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
8
2.2.2 Cost Utilization Index of 2010
Another benchmarking statistic that is useful is the Cost Utilization Index (CUI), which is the cost
for energy used in the building on a square foot basis per year. The CUI is calculated from the
cost for utilities for a year period. The CUI permits comparison of buildings on total energy cost
even though they may be located in areas with differing energy costs and differing heating
and/or cooling climates. The cost of energy, including heating oil, natural gas, and electricity,
can vary greatly over time and geographic location and can be higher in Alaska than other parts
of the country.
The CUI for the Public Works Building is about $2.40. This is based on utility costs from 2010
and the following rates:
Electricity at $0.19 / kWh ($5.57 / Therm)
# 2 Fuel Oil at $2.61 / gallon ($1.86 / Therm)
Due to the higher cost of fuel in 2012 at $3.43 per gallon, the CUI for 2012 will be higher than
2010 and is estimated to be greater than $3.00/SF. The recommended EEM’s, and the savings
associated with them, will be based on the current price.
The Department of Energy Administration study, mentioned in the previous section (CBECS,
2006) found an average cost of $2.52 per square foot in 2003 for 4,400 buildings in the
Continental U.S (Tables C4 and C13 of CBDES, 2006). Schools in Fairbanks have an average
cost for energy of $2.42 per square foot while Anchorage schools average $2.11 per square
foot. The chart below shows the Public Works Building relative to these values. More details
are included in Appendix H.
$2.40 $2.42
$2.11
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
Annual Energy Cost Index (Total Cost/ SF)
Public Works Fairbanks Anchorage
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
9
2.2.3 Seasonal Energy Use Patterns
Energy consumption is often highly correlated with seasonal climate and usage variations. The
graphs below show the electric and fuel consumption of this building over the course of two
years. The lowest monthly use is called the baseline use. The electric baseline often reflects
year round lighting. The clear relation of increased energy usage during periods of cold weather
can be seen in the months with higher usage. The majority of the BTUs used in this building
come from oil at a ratio of less than one BTU from electricity to every ten BTUs from oil, so
decreasing the usage of oil in winter months is necessary to significantly save energy.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Jan-09Mar-09May-09Jul-09Sep-09Nov-09Jan-10Mar-10May-10Jul-10Sep-10Nov-10KWHElectrical Consumption
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Jan-09Mar-09May-09Jul-09Sep-09Nov-09Jan-10Mar-10May-10Jul-10Sep-10Nov-10GallonsFuel Oil Deliveries
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
10
2.2.4 Future Energy Monitoring
Energy accounting is the process of tracking energy consumption and costs. It is important for
the building owner or manager to monitor and record both the energy usage and cost each
month. Comparing trends over time can assist in pinpointing major sources of energy usage and
aid in finding effective energy efficiency measures. There are two basic methods of energy
accounting: manual and automatic. Manual tracking of energy usage may already be performed
by an administrative assistant: however if the records are not scrutinized for energy use, then
the data is merely a financial accounting. Digital energy tracking systems can be installed. They
display and record real-time energy usage and accumulated energy use and cost. There are
several types which have all of the information accessible via Ethernet browser.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
11
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND MODELING RESULTS
After benchmarking of a building is complete and the site visit has identified the specific systems
in the building, a number of different methods are available for quantifying the overall energy
consumption and to model the energy use. These range from relatively simple spreadsheets to
commercially available modeling software capable of handling complex building systems.
NORTECH has used several of these programs and uses the worksheets and software that
best matches the complexity of the building and specific energy use that is being evaluated.
Modeling of an energy efficiency measure (EEM) requires an estimate of the current energy
used by the specific feature, the estimated energy use of the proposed EEM and its installed
cost. EEMs can range from a single simple upgrade, such as light bulb type or type of motor, to
reprogramming of the controls on more complex systems. While the need for a major retrofit
can typically be identified by an energy audit, the specific system upgrades often require
collecting additional data and engineering and design efforts that are beyond the scope of the
Level II energy audit..
Based on the field inspection results and discussions with the building owners/operators,
auditors developed potential EEMs for the facility. Common EEMs that could apply to almost
every older building include:
Reduce the envelope heat losses through:
o increased building insulation, and
o better windows and doors
Reduce temperature difference between inside and outside using setback thermostats
Upgrade inefficient:
o lights,
o motors,
o refrigeration units, and
o other appliances
Reduce running time of lights/appliances through:
o motion sensors,
o on/off timers,
o light sensors, and
o other automatic/programmable systems
The objective of the following sections is to describe how the overall energy use of the building
was modeled and the potential for energy savings. The specific EEMs that provide these overall
energy savings are detailed in Appendix A of this report. While the energy savings of an EEM is
unlikely to change significantly over time, the cost savings of an EEM is highly dependent on the
current energy price and can vary significantly over time. An EEM that is not currently
recommended based on price may be more attractive at a later date or with higher energy
prices.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
12
3.1 Understanding How AkWarm Models Energy Consumption
NORTECH used the AkWarm model for evaluating the overall energy consumption at the Public
Works Building. The AkWarm program was developed by the Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation (AHFC) to model residential energy use. The original AkWarm is the modeling
engine behind the successful residential energy upgrade program that AHFC has operated for a
number of years. In the past few years, AHFC has developed a version of this model for
commercial buildings.
Energy use in buildings is modeled by calculating energy losses and consumption, such as:
• Heat lost through the building envelope components, including windows, doors,
walls, ceilings, crawlspaces, and foundations. These heat losses are computed for
each component based on the area, heat resistance (R-value), and the difference
between the inside temperature and the outside temperature. AkWarm has a library
of temperature profiles for villages and cities in Alaska.
• Window orientation, such as the fact that south facing windows can add heat in the
winter but north-facing windows do not.
• Inefficiencies of the heating system, including the imperfect conversion of fuel oil or
natural gas due to heat loss in exhaust gases, incomplete combustion, excess air,
etc. Some electricity is also consumed in moving the heat around a building through
pumping.
• Inefficiencies of the cooling system, if one exists, due to various imperfections in a
mechanical system and the required energy to move the heat around.
• Lighting requirements and inefficiencies in the conversion of electricity to light;
ultimately all of the power used for lighting is converted to heat. While the heat may
be useful in the winter, it often isn’t useful in the summer when cooling may be
required to remove the excess heat. Lights are modeled by wattage and operational
hours.
• Use and inefficiencies in refrigeration, compressor cooling, and heat pumps. Some
units are more efficient than others. Electricity is required to move the heat from
inside a compartment to outside it. Again, this is a function of the R-Value and the
temperature difference between the inside and outside of the unit.
• Plug loads such as computers, printers, mini-fridges, microwaves, portable heaters,
monitors, etc. These can be a significant part of the overall electricity consumption
of the building, as well as contributing to heat production.
• The schedule of operation for lights, plug loads, motors, etc. is a critical component
of how much energy is used.
AkWarm adds up these heat losses and the internal heat gains based on individual unit usage
schedules. These estimated heat and electrical usages are compared to actual use on both a
yearly and seasonal basis. If the AkWarm model is within 5 % to 10% of the most recent 12
months usage identified during benchmarking, the model is considered accurate enough to
make predictions of energy savings for possible EEMs.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
13
3.1.1 AkWarm Calculated Savings for the Building Name
Based on the field inspection results and discussions with the building owners/operators,
auditors developed potential EEMs for the facility. These EEMs are then entered into AkWarm
to determine if the EEM saves energy and is cost effective (i.e. will pay for itself). AkWarm
calculates the energy and money saved by each EEM and calculates the length of time for the
savings in reduced energy consumption to pay for the installation of the EEM. AkWarm makes
recommendations based on the Savings/Investment Ratio (SIR), which is defined as ratio of the
savings generated over the life of the EEM divided by the installed cost. Higher SIR values are
better and any SIR above one is considered acceptable. If the SIR of an EEM is below one, the
energy savings will not pay for the cost of the EEM and the EEM is not recommended.
Preferred EEMs are listed by AkWarm in order of the highest SIR.
A summary of the savings from the recommended EEMs are listed in this table.
Description Space
Heating
Water
Heating Lighting Refrigeration Other
Electrical
Clothes
Drying Total
Existing
Building $20,052 $313 $1,324 $495 $377 $52 $22,613
With All
Proposed
Retrofits
$14,581 $309 $1,062 $495 $377 $52 $16,876
Savings $5,471 $4 $262 $0 $0 $0 $5,737
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
14
3.1.2 AkWarm Projected Energy Costs after Modifications
The AkWarm recommended EEMs appear to result in significant savings in space heating and
lighting. The energy cost by end use breakdown was provided by AkWarm based on the field
inspection and does not indicate that all individual fixtures and appliances were direct
measured. The current energy costs are shown below on the left hand bar of the graph and the
projected energy costs, assuming use of the recommended EEMs, are shown on the right.
This graphical format allows easy visual comparison of the various energy requirements of the
facility. In the event that not all recommended retrofits are desired, the proposal energy savings
can be estimated from visual interpretation from this graph.
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
Existing Retrofit
Space Heating
Refrigeration
Other Electrical
Lighting
Domestic Hot Water
Clothes Drying
Annual Energy Costs by End Use
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
15
3.2 Energy Efficiency Measures Calculated Outside AkWarm
The AkWarm program effectively models wood-framed and other buildings with standard
heating systems and relatively simple HVAC systems. AkWarm models of more complicated
mechanical systems are sometimes poor due to a number of simplifying assumptions and
limited input of some variables. Furthermore, AKWarm is unable to model complex HVAC
systems such as variable frequency motors, variable air volume (VAV) systems, those with
significant digital or pneumatic controls or significant heat recovery capacity. In addition, some
other building methods and occupancies are outside AkWarm capabilities.
This report section is included in order to identify benefits from modifications to those more
complex systems or changes in occupant behavior that cannot be addressed in AkWarm.
The Public Works Building could be modeled well in AKWarm. Retrofits were adequately
modeled in AKWarm and did not require additional calculations.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
16
4.0 BUILDING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M)
4.1 Operations and Maintenance
A well-implemented operation and maintenance (O & M) plan is often the driving force behind
energy savings. Such a plan includes preserving institutional knowledge, directing preventative
maintenance, and scheduling regular inspections of each piece of HVAC equipment within the
building. Routine maintenance includes the timely replacement of filters, belts and pulleys, the
proper greasing of bearings and other details such as topping off the glycol tanks. Additional
benefits to a maintenance plan are decreased down time for malfunctioning equipment, early
indications of problems, prevention of exacerbated maintenance issues, and early detection of
overloading/overheating issues. A good maintenance person knows the building’s equipment
well enough to spot and repair minor malfunctions before they become major retrofits.
Commissioning of a building is the verification that the HVAC systems act within the design or
usage ranges. This process ideally, though seldom, occurs as the last phase in construction.
HVAC system operation parameters degrade from ideal over time due to incorrect maintenance,
improper replacement pumps, changes in facility tenants or usage, changes in schedules, and
changes in energy costs or loads. Ideally, re-commissioning of a building should occur every
five to ten years. This ensures that the HVAC system meets the potentially variable use with
the most efficient means.
4.2 Building Specific Recommendations
The Public Works building has severe damage to several areas of the building. The walls of the
building have been damaged to the point where holes exist and light is visible from the outside
and heat is able to escape. The man doors do not shut completely and weather stripping is poor
on both the man doors and garage doors. Significant heat is lost through leaks in the building
envelope, and all weather stripping should be repaired.
The heating system has several mechanical problems that should be addressed. The GED
portion of the building had control problems at the time of the visit that caused the area to be
under heated and the public works section has an inoperable unit heater. Repairing these
issues is important because energy management begins with the ability to control temperatures
and heat loss.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
17
APPENDICES
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
18
Appendix A Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures
A number of Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) are available to reduce the energy use and
overall operating cost for the facility. The EEMs listed below are those recommended by
AkWarm based on the calculated savings/investment ration (SIR) as described in Appendix E.
AkWarm also provides a breakeven cost, which is the maximum initial cost of the EEM that will
still return a SIR of one or greater.
This section describes each recommended EEM and identifies the potential energy savings and
installation costs. This also details the calculation of breakeven costs, simple payback, and the
SIR for each recommendation. The recommended EEMs are grouped together generally by the
overall end use that will be impacted.
A.1 Temperature Control
Programmable thermostats should be installed and/or programmed in the entire building.
Programmable thermostats allow for automatic temperature setback, which reduce usage more
reliably than manual setbacks. Reduction of the nighttime temperature set point in the Public
Works building will decrease the energy usage.
Rank Building Space Recommendation
1 Entire Building
Implement a Heating Temperature
Unoccupied Setback to 60.0 deg F for the
ten thermostats in the building space.
Installation Cost $2,000 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 15 Energy Savings (/yr.) $3,025
Breakeven Cost $40,974 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 21 Simple Payback (yr.) 1
A.2 Electrical Loads
A.2.1 Lighting
The electricity used by lighting eventually ends up as heat in the building. In areas where
electricity is more expensive than other forms of energy, or in areas where the summer
temperatures require cooling; this additional heat can be both wasteful and costly. Converting
to more efficient lighting reduces cooling loads in the summer and allows the user to control
heat input in the winter. The conversion from T12 (one and a half inch fluorescent bulbs) to T8
(one inch), T5 (5/8 inch), Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFL), or LED bulbs provides a significant
increase in efficiency. LED bulbs can be directly placed in existing fixtures. The LED bulb
bypasses the ballast altogether, which removes the often irritating, “buzzing” noise that
magnetic ballasts tend to make.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
19
The only lighting retrofit currently recommended is replacement of the outdoor lights. All other
EEMs are not economical at this time.
A.2.2 Other Electrical Loads
No EEMs are recommended in this category. The Public Works building does not have many
significant plug loads.
A.3 Building Envelope: Recommendations for change
A.3.1 Exterior Walls
It is recommended that insulation be added to the exterior of the building. This requires covering
with new T1-11 siding.
A.3.2 Foundation and/or Crawlspace
No EEMs are recommended in this category because the Public Works building already has
perimeter insulation.
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
6 Outdoor 5 MH 175 Watt StdElectronic with Manual
Switching
Replace with 5 LED 20W
Module StdElectronic
Installation Cost $1,500 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 7 Energy Savings (/yr.) $262
Breakeven Cost $1,623 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 6
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
5 Above-Grade Wall:
Original AG Wall
Wall Type: Other
Wall Construction: 2x6" Metal Stud Wall, R-
19
Insulation Quality: Damaged
Modeled R-Value: 10.1
Install R-30 rigid foam board to
exterior and cover with T1-11
siding or equivalent.
Installation Cost $22,763 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 30 Energy Savings
(/yr.) $1,069
Breakeven Cost $25,233 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 21
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
20
A.3.3 Roofing and Ceiling
There are no recommended EEMs in this category. The cost to install R-21 blown-in cellulose
insulation to the attic in the addition and rigid board in the original portion of the Public Works
building is too high.
A.3.4 Windows
No EEMs are recommended in this category.
A.3.5 Doors
It is recommended that an insulated blanket be added to the seven garage doors in the Public
Works building. This should include re-tightening the door frame and adding new gaskets.
Replacing the doors with a better door will not be cost effective at this time.
Rank Location /Feature Existing Condition Recommendation
2 Garage Doors: Wood
Door Type: 1"thick wood frame/polystyrene
core
Insulating Blanket: None
Modeled R-Value: 5
Add R-5 insulating blanket to
garage door
Installation Cost $2,180 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 15 Energy Savings (/yr.) $694
Breakeven Cost $9,399 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 4.3 Simple Payback (yr.) 3
Rank Location Existing Condition Recommendation
3 Garage Door: Metal
Clad
Door Type: 2" metal clad-polystyrene core
Insulating Blanket: None
Modeled R-Value: 6.3
Add R-5 insulating blanket to
garage door
Installation Cost $323 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 15 Energy Savings (/yr.) $75
Breakeven Cost $1,014 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 3.1 Simple Payback (yr.) 4
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
21
A.4 Building Heating System / Air Conditioning
A.4.1 Heating and Heat Distribution
Boiler efficiency can be increased by adding vent dampers to the boilers in both ends of the
building and having them cleaned, tuned, and repaired. This is an inexpensive measure that will
save the city money and energy. Replacing the circulation pump on the GED side of the building
with a variable speed pump will decrease the electrical usage in the building as the pump slows
down when the need for water is decreased.
The well pump was cycling excessively due to the expansion tank being low on air during the
time of the visit. This tank needs to be recharged or replaced.
A.4.2 Air Conditioning
The Public Works building is not equipped with an air conditioning system.
A.4.3 Ventilation
No EEMs are recommended in this category.
A.4.4 Air Changes and Air Tightening
No EEMs are recommended in this area because of the difficulty of quantifying the amount of
leaking air and the savings. However, by using a blower door to depressurize the building and
an infra-red camera, the location of significant air leaks can be determined so they can be
repaired.
Rank Recommendation
4 Clean, tune and repair boiler. Replace circ pump. Add Vent Damper.
Installation
Cost $3,000 Estimated Life of Measure (yr.) 10 Energy Savings (/yr.) $612
Breakeven
Cost $5,621 Savings-to-Investment Ratio 1.9 Simple Payback (yr.) 5
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
22
Appendix B Energy Efficiency Measures that are NOT Recommended
As indicated in other sections of the report, a number of potential EEMs were identified that
were determined to be NOT cost effective by the AkWarm model. These EEMs are not
currently recommended on the basis of energy savings alone because each may only save a
small amount of energy, have a high capital cost, or be expensive to install. While each of
these EEMs is not cost effective at this time, future changes in building use such as longer
operating hours, higher energy prices, new fixtures or hardware on the market, and decreases
in installation effort may make any of these EEMs cost effective in the future. These potential
EEMs should be reviewed periodically to identify any changes to these factors that would
warrant re-evaluation.
Although these upgrades are not currently cost effective on an energy cost basis, the fixtures,
hardware, controls, or operational changes described these EEMs should be considered when
replacing an existing fixture or unit for other reasons. For example, replacing an existing
window with a triple-pane window may not be cost effective based only on energy use, but the if
a window is going to be replaced for some other reason, then the basis for a decision is only the
incremental cost of upgrading from a less efficient replacement window to a more efficient
replacement window. That incremental cost difference will have a significantly shorter payback,
especially since the installation costs are likely to be the same for both units.
The following measures were not found to be cost-effective:
Rank Feature/
Location Improvement Description
Estimated
Annual
Energy
Savings
Estimated
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio (SIR)
Simple
Payback
(Years)
7 Ceiling w/ Attic:
Addition Attic
Add R-12 blown cellulose
insulation to attic with
Standard Truss.
$221 $5,649 0.92 26
8 Lighting:
Mezzanine, 106
Replace with 3 FLUOR CFL, A
Lamp 20W $1 $8 0.78 7.5
9 Exterior Door:
Solid Wood
Remove existing door and
install standard pre-hung U-
0.16 insulated door, including
hardware.
$15 $506 0.70 34
10 Lighting: 111
Replace with 8 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
$120 $1,064 0.66 8.9
11 Lighting: 103,
104, 105
Replace with 3 FLUOR CFL, A
Lamp 15W $1 $8 0.63 9.4
12
Above-Grade
Wall: Addition
AG Wall
Install R-15 rigid foam board to
exterior and cover with T1-11
siding or equivalent.
$608 $23,692 0.61 39
13
Cathedral
Ceiling: Original
Ceiling
Install R-14 rigid board
insulation. No cost included for
covering insulation.
$266 $12,775 0.49 48
14
Window/Skylight:
Double Wood/
Vinyl Other
Storm
Replace existing window with
triple pane, 2 low-E, argon
window.
$29 $1,615 0.32 55
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
23
The following measures were not found to be cost-effective:
Rank Feature/
Location Improvement Description
Estimated
Annual
Energy
Savings
Estimated
Installed
Cost
Savings to
Investment
Ratio (SIR)
Simple
Payback
(Years)
15
Window/Skylight:
Double Wood/
Vinyl Other
Replace existing window with
triple pane, 2 low-E, argon
window.
$28 $1,376 0.35 50
16 Exterior Door:
Metal
Remove existing door and
install standard pre-hung U-
0.16 insulated door, including
hardware.
$35 $3,140 0.26 90
17 Lighting: 102,
101
Replace with 14 FLUOR (3) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
$6 $168 0.22 26
18 Lighting: 106,
107
Replace with 60 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
$90 $7,980 0.07 88
19 Lighting: 113
Replace with 12 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
$3 $1,596 0.01 530
20 Lighting: 106,
108, 110
Replace with 5 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
$1 $665 0.01 610
21 Lighting: 109,
112
Replace with 4 FLUOR (2) T8
4' F32T8 25W Energy-Saver
Instant StdElectronic
$1 $532 0.01 610
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
24
Appendix C Significant Equipment List
HVAC Equipment
Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Fuel Type
Boiler Weil McLain Gold WEDGO-7 #2
Boiler Weil McLain WGO-5 #2
Circulation Pump Bell and Gossett n/a n/a
Unit Heater Dunham Bush H-250-C Electric
Unit Heater Dunham Bush H-250-C Electric
Unit Heater Trane 5KSB298G30003CT Electric
Unit Heater Trane 5KSB298G30003CT Electric
Unit Heater Trane 5KSB298G30003CT Electric
Circulation Pump Grundfos UPS 32-80F n/a
Circulation Pump Grundfos UP 26-64F n/a
Lighting
Location Lighting Type Bulb Type Quantity KWH/YR Cost/YR
Rooms 106 and 107 Fluorescent T12 30 2,458 $ 541
Room 111 Fluorescent T12 8 1,837 404
Outside Metal Halide 175 W 5 1,363 300
Rooms 101 and 102 Fluorescent T8 14 249 55
Energy Consumption calculated by AkWarm based on wattage, schedule, and an electricity rate of $0.19/kWh
Plug Loads
Equipment Location Manufacturer KWH/YR Cost/YR
Welder Shop Lincoln 626 $ 138
Battery Charger Ambulance Bay n/a 526 116
Energy Consumption calculated by AkWarm based on wattage, schedule, and an electricity rate of $0.19/kWh
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
25
Appendix D Local Utility Rate Structure
The information in this section was provided directly from the local utility or gathered from the
local utility’s publicly available information at the time of the audit. All language used in this
section was provided by the local utility and believed to be current at the time of the audit.
Energy use terms, specific fees, and other specific information are subject to change. Updated
rate structure information should be gathered from the utility during future discussion of rates,
rate structures and utility pricing agreements.
Golden Valley Electric Association Rate Structure:
GS-1 General Service Effective Rates***
Customer Charge $20.00
Utility Charge $0.08923 / kWh $0.21660 / kWh
***The effective rate is all of the charges totaled together and divided by the kilowatt hour used.
GVEA offers five different rates to its members, depending on the classification of the service
provided. The rates are divided into two categories: Residential and General Service (GS).
Eighty-five percent of the electric services on GVEA's system are single-family dwellings,
classified under the Residential rate. The four General Service rates apply to small and large
power users that do not qualify for the Residential rate.
The General Service rates break down as follows:
GS-1 General Service Services under 50 kilowatts (kW) of demand per billing cycle
GS-2(S) Large General Service
Secondary Services 50 kW and higher of demand per billing cycle
GS-2(P) Large General Service
Primary Services at primary voltage
GS-3 Industrial Service Services at transmission voltage
Customer Charge
A flat fee that covers costs for meter reading, billing and customer service.
Utility Charge (kWh charge)
This charge is multiplied by the number of kilowatt-hours (kWh) used in a monthly billing period.
It covers the costs to maintain power plants and substations, interest on loans as well as wires,
power poles and transformers.
Fuel and Purchased Power
This charge is based on a combination of forecasted and actual power costs. The monthly
charge allows Golden Valley to pass on increases and decreases in fuel and energy purchases
to our members. It is calculated quarterly and multiplied by the kilowatt-hours used each month.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
26
Regulatory Charge
This charge of .000492 per kWh is set by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). Since
November 1, 1992, the Regulatory Commission of Alaska has been funded by a Regulatory
Charge to the utilities it regulates rather than through the State general fund. The charge,
labeled "Regulatory Cost Charge." on your bill, is set by the RCA, and applies to all retail
kilowatt-hours sold by regulated electric utilities in Alaska.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
27
Appendix E Analysis Methods
Analysis Methodology
Data collected was processed using AkWarm energy use software to estimate current energy
consumption by end usage and calculate energy savings for each of the proposed energy
efficiency measures (EEMs). In addition, separate analysis may have been conducted to
evaluate EEMs that AkWarm cannot effectively model to evaluate potential reductions in annual
energy consumption. Analyses were conducted under the direct supervision of a Certified
Energy Auditor, Certified Energy Manager, or a Professional Engineer.
EEMs are evaluated based on building use, maintenance and processes, local climate
conditions, building construction type, function, operational schedule and existing conditions.
Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering
estimations. Each model created in AkWarm is carefully compared to existing utility usage
obtained from utility bills. The AkWarm analysis provides a number of tools for assessing the
cost effectiveness of various improvement options. The primary assessment value used in this
audit report is the Savings/Investment Ratio (SIR). The SIR is a method of cost analysis that
compares the total cost savings through reduced energy consumption to the total cost of a
project over its assumed lifespan, including both the construction cost and ongoing maintenance
and operating costs. Other measurement methods include Simple Payback, which is defined as
the length of time it takes for the savings to equal the total installed cost and Breakeven Cost,
which is defined as the highest cost that would yield a Savings/Investment Ratio of one.
EEMs are recommended by AkWarm in order of cost-effectiveness. AkWarm first calculates
individual SIRs for each EEM, and then ranks the EEMs by SIR, with higher SIRs at the top of
the list. An individual EEM must have a SIR greater than or equal to one in order to be
recommended by AkWarm. Next AkWarm modifies the building model to include the installation
of the first EEM and then re-simulates the energy use. Then the remaining EEMs are re-
evaluated and ranked again. AkWarm goes through this iterative process until all suggested
EEMs have been evaluated.
Under this iterative review process, the savings for each recommended EEM is calculated
based on the implementation of the other, more cost effective EEMs first. Therefore, the
implementation of one EEM affects the savings of other EEMs that are recommended later.
The savings from any one individual EEM may be relatively higher if the individual EEM is
implemented without the other recommended EEMs. For example, implementing a reduced
operating schedule for inefficient lighting may result in relatively higher savings than
implementing the same reduced operating schedule for newly installed lighting that is more
efficient. If multiple EEMs are recommended, AkWarm calculates a combined savings.
Inclusion of recommendations for energy savings outside the capability of AkWarm will impact
the actual savings from the AkWarm projections. This will almost certainly result in lower
energy savings and monetary savings from AkWarm recommendations. The reality is that only
so much energy is consumed in a building. Energy savings from one EEM reduces the amount
of energy that can be saved from additional EEMs. For example, installation of a lower wattage
light bulb does not save energy or money if the bulb is never turned on because of a schedule
or operational change at the facility.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
28
Appendix F Audit Limitations
The results of this audit are dependent on the input data provided and can only act as an
approximation. In some instances, several EEMs or installation methods may achieve the
identified potential savings. Actual savings will depend on the EEM selected, the price of
energy, and the final installation and implementation methodology. Competent tradesmen and
professional engineers may be required to design, install, or otherwise implement some of the
recommended EEMs. This document is an energy use audit report and is not intended as a
final design document, operation, and maintenance manual, or to take the place of any
document provided by a manufacturer or installer of any device described in this report.
Cost savings are calculated based on estimated initial costs for each EEM. Estimated costs
include labor and equipment for the full up-front investment required to implement the EEM.
The listed installation costs within the report are conceptual budgetary estimates and should not
be used as design estimates. The estimated costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry
publications, local contractors and equipment suppliers, and the professional judgment of the
CEA writing the report and based on the conditions at the time of the audit.
Cost and energy savings are approximations and are not guaranteed.
Additional significant energy savings can usually be found with more detailed auditing
techniques that include actual measurements of electrical use, temperatures in the building and
HVAC ductwork, intake and exhaust temperatures, motor runtime and scheduling, and infrared,
air leakage to name just a few. Implementation of these techniques is the difference between a
Level III Energy Audit and the Level II Audit that has been conducted.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
29
Appendix G References
Although not all documents listed below are specifically referenced in this report, each contains
information and insights considered valuable to most buildings.
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development; Education Support Services/Facilities.
(1999). Alaska School Facilities Preventative Maintenance Handbook. Juneau, AK:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development.
Alaska Housing Finance Corportation. (2010). Retrofit Energy Assessment for Loans. AHFC.
ASHRAE. (1997). 1997 ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
ASHRAE. (2007). ASHRAE Standard 105-2007 Expressing and Comparing Building Energy
Performance. Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE. (2007). ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 Energy Standards for buildings Except Low-
Rise Residential Buildings. Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE. (2010). ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2010 Ventilaton for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE. (2010). ASHRAE Standard 62.2-2010 Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in
Low Rise Residential Buildings. Retrieved from ASHRAE: www.ashrae.org
ASHRAE RP-669 and SP-56. (2004). Procedures for Commercial Building Energy Audits.
Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
Coad, W. J. (1982). Energy Engineering and Management for Building Systems. Scarborough,
Ontario, Canada: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Daley, D. T. (2008). The Little Black Book of Reliability Management. New York, NY: Industrial
Press, Inc.
Federal Energy Management Program. (2004, March 3). Demand Controlled Ventilation Using
CO2 Sensors. Retrieved 2011, from US DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy:
http://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/fta_co2.pdf
Federal Energy Management Program. (2006, April 26). Low-Energy Building Design
Guidelines. Retrieved 2011, from Department of Energy; Federal Energy Management
Program: http://www.eren.doe.gov/femp/
Institute, E. a. (2004). Variable Speed Pumping: A Guide to Successful Applications. Oxford,
UK: Elsevier Advanced Technology.
International Code Council. (2009). International Energy Conservation Code. Country Club Hills,
IL: International Code Council, Inc.
Leach, M., Lobato, C., Hirsch, A., Pless, S., & Torcellini, P. (2010, September). Technical
Support Document: Strategies for 50% Energy Savings in Large Office Buildings.
Retrieved 2011, from National Renewable Energy Laboratory:
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/49213.pdf
Thumann, P.E., C.E.M., A., Younger, C.E.M., W. J., & Niehus, P.E., C.E.M., T. (2010).
Handbook of Energy Audits Eighth Edition. Lilburn, GA: The Fairmont Press, Inc.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2006). Commercial Building Energy Consumption
Survey (CBECS). Retrieved 2011, from Energy Information Administration:
http://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
30
Appendix H Typical Energy Use and Cost – Fairbanks and Anchorage
This report provides data on typical energy costs and use on selected building in Fairbanks and
Anchorage, Alaska for comparative purposes only. The values provided by the US Energy
Information Administration CBECS study included a broader range of building types for the
Continental U.S. are not necessarily good comparatives for buildings and conditions in Alaska.
An assortment of values from CBECS may be found in Appendix I.
The Alaska data described in this report came from a benchmarking study NORTECH and other
Technical Services Providers (TSPs) completed on publicly owned buildings in Alaska under
contract with AHFC. This study acquired actual utility data for municipal buildings and schools
in Alaska for the two recent full years. The utility data included costs and quantities including
fuel oil, electricity, propane, wood, steam, and all other energy source usage. This resulted in a
database of approximately 900 buildings. During the course of the benchmarking study, the
comparisons made to the CBECS data appeared to be inappropriate for various reasons.
Therefore, this energy use audit report references the average energy use and energy cost of
Anchorage and Fairbanks buildings as described below.
The Alaska benchmarking data was evaluated in order to find valid comparison data. Buildings
with major energy use information missing were eliminated from the data pool. After detailed
scrutiny of the data, the most complete information was provided to NORTECH by the
Fairbanks North Star Borough School District (FNSBSD) and the Anchorage School District
(ASD). The data sets from these two sources included both the actual educational facilities as
well as the district administrative buildings and these are grouped together in this report as
Fairbanks and Anchorage schools. These two sources of information, being the most complete
and reasonable in-state information, have been used to identify an average annual energy
usage for Fairbanks and for Anchorage in order to provide a comparison for other facilities in
Alaska.
Several factors may limit the comparison of a specific facility to these regional indicators. In
Fairbanks, the FNSBSD generally uses number two fuel oil for heating needs and electricity is
provided by Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA). GVEA produces electricity from a coal
fired generation plant with additional oil generation upon demand. A few of the FNSBSD
buildings in this selection utilize district steam and hot water. The FNSBSD has recently (the
last ten years) invested significantly in envelope and other efficiency upgrades to reduce their
operating costs. Therefore a reader should be aware that this selection of Fairbanks buildings
has energy use at or below average for the entire Alaska benchmarking database.
Heating in Anchorage is through natural gas from the nearby natural gas fields. Electricity is
also provided using natural gas. As the source is nearby and the infrastructure for delivery is in
place, energy costs are relatively low in the area. As a result, the ASD buildings have lower
energy costs, but higher energy use, than the average for the entire benchmarking database.
These special circumstances should be considered when comparing the typical annual energy
use for particular buildings.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
31
Appendix I Typical Energy Use and Cost – Continental U.S.
This report references the Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS),
published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2006. Initially this report was
expected to compare the annual energy consumption of the building to average national energy
usage as documented below. However, a direct comparison between one specific building and
the groups of buildings outlined below yielded confusing results. Instead, this report uses a
comparative analysis on Fairbanks and Anchorage data as described in Appendix F. An
abbreviated excerpt from CBECS on commercial buildings in the Continental U.S. is below.
Released: Dec 2006
Next CBECS will be conducted in 2007
Table C3. Consumption and Gross Energy Intensity for Sum of Major Fuels for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003
All Buildings* Sum of Major Fuel Consumption
Number of
Buildings
(thousand)
Floor space
(million
square feet)
Floor space
per Building
(thousand
square feet)
Total
(trillion
BTU)
per
Building
(million
BTU)
per
Square
Foot
(thousand
BTU)
per
Worker
(million
BTU)
All Buildings* 4,645 64,783 13.9 5,820 1,253 89.8 79.9
Building Floor space (Square Feet)
1,001 to 5,000 2,552 6,789 2.7 672 263 98.9 67.6
5,001 to 10,000 889 6,585 7.4 516 580 78.3 68.7
10,001 to 25,000 738 11,535 15.6 776 1,052 67.3 72.0
25,001 to 50,000 241 8,668 35.9 673 2,790 77.6 75.8
50,001 to 100,000 129 9,057 70.4 759 5,901 83.8 90.0
100,001 to 200,000 65 9,064 138.8 934 14,300 103.0 80.3
200,001 to 500,000 25 7,176 289.0 725 29,189 101.0 105.3
Over 500,000 7 5,908 896.1 766 116,216 129.7 87.6
Principal Building Activity
Education 386 9,874 25.6 820 2,125 83.1 65.7
Food Sales 226 1,255 5.6 251 1,110 199.7 175.2
Food Service 297 1,654 5.6 427 1,436 258.3 136.5
Health Care 129 3,163 24.6 594 4,612 187.7 94.0
Inpatient 8 1,905 241.4 475 60,152 249.2 127.7
Outpatient 121 1,258 10.4 119 985 94.6 45.8
Lodging 142 5,096 35.8 510 3,578 100.0 207.5
Retail (Other Than Mall) 443 4,317 9.7 319 720 73.9 92.1
Office 824 12,208 14.8 1,134 1,376 92.9 40.3
Public Assembly 277 3,939 14.2 370 1,338 93.9 154.5
Public Order and Safety 71 1,090 15.5 126 1,791 115.8 93.7
Religious Worship 370 3,754 10.1 163 440 43.5 95.6
Service 622 4,050 6.5 312 501 77.0 85.0
Warehouse and Storage 597 10,078 16.9 456 764 45.2 104.3
Other 79 1,738 21.9 286 3,600 164.4 157.1
Vacant 182 2,567 14.1 54 294 20.9 832.1
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
32
Appendix J List of Conversion Factors and Energy Units
1 British Thermal Unit is the energy required to raise one pound of water one degree F°
1 Watt is approximately 3.412 BTU/hr
1 horsepower is approximately 2,544 BTU/hr
1 horsepower is approximately 746 Watts
1 "ton of cooling” is approximately 12,000 BTU/hr, the amount of power required to
melt one short ton of ice in 24 hours
1 Therm = 100,000 BTU
1 KBTU = 1,000 BTU
1 KWH = 3413 BTU
1 KW = 3413 BTU/Hr
1 Boiler HP = 33,400 BTU/Hr
1 Pound Steam = approximately 1000 BTU
1 CCF of natural gas = approximately 1 Therm
1 inch H2O = 250 Pascal (Pa) = 0.443 pounds/square inch (psi)
1 atmosphere (atm) = 10,1000 Pascal (Pa)
BTU British Thermal Unit
CCF 100 Cubic Feet
CFM Cubic Feet per Minute
GPM Gallons per minute
HP Horsepower
Hz Hertz
kg Kilogram (1,000 grams)
kV Kilovolt (1,000 volts)
kVA Kilovolt-Amp
kVAR Kilovolt-Amp Reactive
KW Kilowatt (1,000 watts)
KWH Kilowatt Hour
V Volt
W Watt
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
33
Appendix K List of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions
ACH Air Changes per Hour
AFUE Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency
Air Economizer A duct, damper, and automatic control system that
allows a cooling system to supply outside air to reduce
or eliminate the need for mechanical cooling.
Ambient Temperature Average temperature of the surrounding air
Ballast A device used with an electric discharge lamp to cause
the lamp to start and operate under the proper circuit
conditions of voltage, current, electrode heat, etc.
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CUI Cost Utilization Index
CDD Cooling Degree Days
DDC Direct Digital Control
EEM Energy Efficiency Measure
EER Energy Efficient Ratio
EUI Energy Utilization Index
FLUOR Fluorescent
Grade The finished ground level adjoining a building at the
exterior walls
HDD Heating Degree Days
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning
INCAN Incandescent
NPV Net Present Value
R-value Thermal resistance measured in BTU/Hr-SF-̊F (Higher
value means better insulation)
SCFM Standard Cubic Feet per Minute
Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) Savings over the life of the EEM divided by Investment
capital cost. Savings includes the total discounted dollar
savings considered over the life of the improvement.
Investment in the SIR calculation includes the labor and
materials required to install the measure.
Set Point Target temperature that a control system operates the
heating and cooling system
Simple payback A cost analysis method whereby the investment cost of
an EEM is divided by the first year’s savings of the EEM
to give the number of years required to recover the cost
of the investment.
Energy Audit – Final Report
Public Works Building
Delta Junction, Alaska
F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-300 Doyon Other Region\50-330 Delta Junction\50-338 Public Works\Reports\Final\2012.07011 Final AHFC Report
BIG Delta Public Works.Docx
34
Appendix L Building Floor Plan
N Plans by NORTECH from on-site sketches GED Public Works Rescue Squad Boiler #1Boiler #2