Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAI FNSB North Pole HS APX C removed 2012-EEManaging Office 2400 College Road 3105 Lakeshore Dr. Suite 106A 4402 Thane Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 Juneau, Alaska 99801 p. 907.452.5688 p. 907.222.2445 p: 907.586.6813 f. 907.452.5694 f. 907.222.0915 f: 907.586.6819 www.nortechengr.com ENERGY AUDIT – FINAL REPORT North Pole High School 601 NPHS Blvd. North Pole, Alaska Prepared for: Mr. Larry Morris Fairbanks North Star Borough School District July 31, 2012 Acknowledgment: "This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-EE0000095.” ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, HEALTH & SAFETY Anchorage: 3105 Lakeshore Dr, Ste 106A, 99503 907.222.2445 Fax: 222.0915 Juneau: 4402 Thane Rd, 99801 907.586.6813 Fax: 586.6819 Fairbanks: 2400 College Rd, 99709 907.452.5688 Fax: 452.5694 info@nortechengr.com www.nortechengr.com F:\00-Jobs\2011\2602 F - AHFC Grade Audits\50-100 Doyon Fairbanks Region\50-140 FNSB SD North Pole High\Reports\Final\North Pole High Cover Letter V1.Docx As a Technical Service Provider (TSP) to the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) under Task Order 4, NORTECH has completed an Investment Grade Audit (IGA) of North Pole High School in North Pole, Alaska. This work was funded by AHFC through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Due to the scheduling requirements for completion of the IGAs and to provide a more thorough review of certain mechanical systems, NORTECH sub-contracted RS Consulting for the primary energy audit services for North Pole High School. RS Consulting is owned and operated by Ray Sneeringer, a licensed Mechanical Engineer in the State of Washington and most of the audit field work was completed by Sandra Edwards, a Certified Energy Manager (CEM) and owner of Edwards Energy Environmental and Waste Management. RS Consulting’s IGA methodology generally followed that outlined in the REAL Manual for an IGA. RS Consulting used Trane Trace 700 to model North Pole High School due to the more complex systems found in this facility. This report evaluates a few major EEMs and ECMs, which are generally consistent with NORTECH’s overall findings that FNSB SD facilities are well-maintained and well-operated with few areas for significant potential energy savings. While NORTECH agrees with the recommendations for the EEM/ECM packages, the cost estimates appear to be somewhat lower than expected from local vendors. Since the recommended upgrade(s) involve specific pieces of equipment and installation methods, NORTECH recommends the FNSB SD obtain project-specific quotes or bids from local vendors before approving the specific project. Due to rapid advancements of lighting technologies, project-specific lighting retrofits should be designed no more than six months prior to retrofitting in order to achieve the best technology and maximum savings. NORTECH believes some additional energy and cost savings may be achievable in particular areas of the building. The data necessary to evaluate these upgrades is outside the scope of work of this IGA, but could most likely be collected relatively easily using the mechanical system controls and/or some dataloggers. Specific areas that have the potential for additional energy and cost savings include: 1) Plug load retrofits (ex: replacing old refrigerators, placing vending machines on timers) 2) De-lamping areas of high foot-candles if lighting replacement isn’t performed 3) Domestic hot water generation and use (ex: low flow/automatic fixtures, solar water heating) While this report differs from the format of other NORTECH reports produced for AHFC and the FNSB SD, NORTECH has reviewed the work of RS Consulting and determined this report is complete and accurately depicts the energy use of the building. Any future questions, comments, or correspondence regarding this report should be addressed to the undersigned. Sincerely, NORTECH Peter Beardsley, PE, CEA Principal RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 1       ENERGY AUDIT REPORT   FOR   ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION    Client:  Alaska Housing Finance Corporation    Research and Rural Development Division   P.O. Box 101020   Anchorage, Alaska  99510   Attention:  Ms. Rebekah Lührs     Prepared by:  RS Consulting     2400 NW 80th Street, Suite 178    Seattle, Washington 98117    Telephone:  (206) 368‐1784        Edwards Energy Environmental & Waste Management    PO Box 2110    Issaquah, Washington 98027    Telephone:  (206) 303‐0121    Principal  Ray W. Sneeringer, PE   Investigators:  Sandra F. Edwards, CEM, CDSM      Prepared for:  NORTECH    Sustainable Environmental Engineering, Health, & Safety    2400 College Road    Fairbanks, Alaska  99709    Telephone:  (907) 452‐5688          RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 2     ACKNOWLEDGMENT   AND   DISCLAIMER    Acknowledgment:  We would like to acknowledge and extend our heartfelt gratitude to the Department of Energy.   This  material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE‐ EE0000095.   Disclaimer:  This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States  Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their  employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for  the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed,  or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific  commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does  not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States  Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not  necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.                               RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 3       TABLE  OF CONTENTS  1.0  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 4  2.0  INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 6  3.0  BUILDING DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 8  4.0  ENVELOPE .................................................................................................................................... 9  5.0 LIGHTING ................................................................................................................................... 13  6.0 MECHANICAL ............................................................................................................................. 15  7.0  ENERGY USE ............................................................................................................................... 18  8.0  ENERGY MEASURES .................................................................................................................... 19  9.0  ENERGY MEASURE DESCRIPTIONS .............................................................................................. 21  10.0  SIMPLE PAYBACK AND SIR .......................................................................................................... 24  11.0  OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 25  12.0  RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 26    APPENDICES  APPENDIX A ......................................................................................................  ENERGY UTILIZATION INDEX  APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................... COST ESTIMATE  APPENDIX C ...........................................................................................................  LIGHTING CALCULATIONS  APPENDIX D .................................................................................................... MECHANICAL CALCULATIONS  APPENDIX E ..................................................................................................................... SYSTEM DIAGRAMS  APPENDIX F ............................................................................................................ EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES  APPENDIX G ........................................................................................................................ TRACE 700 INPUT  APPENDIX H ..................................................................................................................... TRACE 700 OUTPUT  APPENDIX I ......................................................................................................... TREND LOG INFORMATION  APPENDIX J ............................................................................................................................... FLOOR PLANS  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 4     1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  Background  This energy audit report was prepared by RS Consulting and Edwards Energy Environmental & Waste  Management in conjunction with NORTECH Sustainable Environmental Engineering, Health, & Safety for  the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation.   The North Pole High School is a 156,400 square foot facility  located in North Pole, Alaska.  The building serves 9th through 12th grade high school students and  consists of classrooms, an auditorium, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and other miscellaneous  support functions.    Scope   This Level II Energy Audit focused on the building’s envelope, lighting, and HVAC systems and consisted  of an on‐site review of the existing facility, a review of the most current construction drawings,  identification of potential energy efficiency measures (EEMS), creation of a computer simulation model  to examine these EEMs, and a schematic level estimate of the installed costs and relative pay backs for  each measure examined.     The Trane Trace 700 computer program was used to model the existing building’s energy consumption.    The energy consumption values predicted by the model were then compared to actual energy  consumption as shown in utility bills from 2009 and 2010.  The computer model was then “tuned” to  match the actual energy consumption as closely as possible.    Energy Use Index  Two years of utility bills were examined to determine the current energy consumption of the facility.   The Energy Use Index (EUI) for this facility is 75 kBTU/SF.  The chart below compares the existing and  proposed EUI for the building with the EPA Energy Star design target value for a similar building in this  location.  This target value was developed using the Energy Star Target Finder software and represents  the design criteria for a 50% Energy Star Rated Building, rather than the median value for existing K‐12  Schools.      RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 5     Energy Consumption  The majority of the facility’s energy consumption can be attributed to the energy required to heat the  outside ventilation air as it is introduced into the building.   Any effort to conserve energy should start  with an examination of the operation of the ventilation system.  Utility Costs  The annual utility cost predicted by the energy model for the existing building is $327,940.  The  estimated utility cost after implementation of the recommended Energy Efficiency Measures (EEM) is  $307,110 for an annual savings of $20,830.  A breakdown of the current and proposed energy costs is  presented in the following charts:    Recommendations  We recommend implementation of a program to ensure that the operable windows remain closed  during the heating season.  The remaining original windows are failing and should be replaced in order  to improve the performance of the building’s envelope.   An inspection and monitoring the outside air  dampers of each air handling unit should be performed in order to reduce the amount of outside air  being introduced into the facility to current code minimums during cold weather and to eliminate the  introduction of outside air into the facility during unoccupied hours.  We also recommend implementation of the Energy Efficiency Measures listed in the table below.   Implementation of these measures should be accompanied by a more detailed Level III analysis which  should include operational data logging, detailed engineering drawings and cost estimates, and a plan  for future monitoring and verification of the performance of the installed measure.   NORTH POLE HIGH SCHOOL ‐ Recommended Measures  Tag Measure Description Cost Payback  (Yrs) SIR  EEM‐1 Variable Speed Fans on AHU‐2 and REF‐2  $18,000 7.8 1.8  EEM‐2 Variable Speed Main Heating Water Pumps  $60,000 3.2 4.4  Please refer the body of this report for additional information on these Energy Efficiency Measures.  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 6     2.0 INTRODUCTION  This energy audit report has been prepared by RS Consulting (RSC) and Edwards Energy Environmental &  Waste Management (EEEWM) in conjunction with NORTECH Sustainable Environmental Engineering,  Health, & Safety for the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC).   RSC and EEEWM audited North  Pole High School in an effort to find cost effective opportunities to reduce building energy consumption.   The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) and Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) analyzed in‐depth as  part of the contract included several mechanical system improvements.   Two classifications of energy saving measures were examined during this energy audit. The first is a low  cost or no cost solution designed to save energy by making changes to occupant activities, schedules,  control set points, or small upgrades to existing equipment.  This type of measure is identified in this  report as an Energy Conservation Measure (ECM).   The second type of energy saving measure requires  significant capital investment to achieve energy savings. This is referred to as an Energy Efficiency  Measure (EEM).  This Level II Energy Audit focused on the building’s envelope, lighting, and HVAC systems.  A level II  energy audit includes a survey of the building and a breakdown of the energy end uses within the  building.  This audit identifies and examines practical ECMs and EEMs to determine the potential energy  savings realized if the measure is enacted.  It also serves to identify potential improvements that may  require the more thorough data collection and detailed engineering drawings and estimates which  typically occur in a Level III audit.  The scope of work for this audit consisted of an on‐site review of the  existing facility, a review of the most current construction drawings, identification of potential Energy  Conservation Measures (ECMs) and Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs), creation of a computer  simulation model to examine these EEMs, and a schematic level estimate of the installed costs and  relative pay backs for each measure examined.     The audit team inspected the building during preliminary stages of the energy audit.  The purpose of this  field visit was to verify the configuration of the existing mechanical equipment and to assess its  condition. Information was also gathered on the size and efficiency of the existing accessible mechanical  system motors.   A list of major mechanical equipment used in this facility can be found in Appendix F.  We also performed a review of the building envelope to identify any potential areas for possible  improvement in energy performance and documented the type and number of lighting fixtures used  throughout the facility to in order to identify opportunities to improve the performance of the lighting  system.  Two years of utility bills were analyzed to determine the energy performance of the existing building in  order to match the existing use with the use predicted by the computer model.  Potential EEMs were  identified and examined via the computer model or spreadsheet calculations.  The predicted energy  savings of these measures were then compared to the estimated installation cost to determine the  relative pay back of each measure.  The Trane Trace 700 computer program was used to model the existing building’s energy consumption.    The energy consumption values predicted by the model were compared to actual energy consumption  as shown in utility bills from 2009 and 2010.  The computer model was “tuned” to match the actual  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 7     energy consumption as closely as possible.   This baseline was used to predict the energy savings  realized by the proposed EEMs.   The existing building energy use, as predicted by the computer model  is shown in Figure 1.    Figure 1:  North Pole High School:  Energy Use by System  Heating energy comprises 65% (59% plus 6%) of the energy used in the school.  This is consistent with  the extremely low temperatures experienced during the subarctic winters in Fairbanks.  This heating  energy consists of an oil component, which is the oil used by the boilers and the domestic hot water  generators, and an electrical component, which is the electricity used by the boiler’s ancillary  equipment, such as the oil pump, the burner fan and miscellaneous electrical controls.     The cost of heating oil is significantly less than the cost of electricity per unit of energy ($.018/mbtu vs.  $.052/mbtu) so although the heating system consumes 65% of the building energy, it represents only  45% of the total utility bills.  Figure 2 shows the actual cost of the energy consumed by the facility.    Figure 2:  North Pole High School:  Energy Cost by System  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 8     The heating load consists of the heat lost across the building envelope and the heat used to warm  outside air as it enters the building.  This outside air is necessary to provide make up air for the  building’s exhaust fans and ventilation air for the occupants.  The breakdown of the total heat load of  the school is shown in Figure 3.    Figure 3: North Pole High School:  Building Heating Loads by Component  It can be concluded from the preceding charts, that efforts to conserve energy in the facility should  begin with an examination of the ventilation air system.  Please refer to Section 9.0 of this report for a  more detailed discussion of this ventilation system.  Information in this study has focused on the areas of building envelope, lighting, and HVAC.  Please  reference subsequent sections of this audit report for detail information on the Energy Conservation  Measures (ECMs), Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs), calculation methodologies, and a summary of the  findings and recommendations.    3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION  North Pole High School is a two‐ story 156,362 square foot facility located in North Pole, Alaska.  The  building serves 9th through 12th grade high school students and consists of classrooms, an auditorium, a  gymnasium, administrative offices, and other miscellaneous support functions.   This school was  constructed in 1984 and is 28 years old.  The school is part of the Fairbanks North Star Borough School  District, located in Fairbanks, Alaska.    The student enrollment for year 2011‐2012 consists of 781  students and 100 staff.  The energy utility suppliers are Golden Valley Electric (GVEA) and Sourdough  Fuel.        RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 9     3.1 Building Construction  Year Built: 1984  Area: 156,362 sq. ft.  Stories: Two  Roof: Flat  Floor: Slab on grade   Walls: Combination of Stucco, Concrete, Sheetrock  Windows: Combination of Double and Triple‐pane  Wood Frame  Windows  Doors: Combination of Wood‐Hollow‐Metal/Glass  3.2 Building Operation  Use: Education  Operation: 6:00 am – 11:00 pm (cleaning /events until 11:00 pm)   Monday – Friday   Summer School  (No)  Occupancy /  Enrollment: 100  Staff & 781 Students    3.3 Existing Energy Efficiency Items    Several energy efficient measures are currently in use in this facility.  These include:     Recent energy efficient lighting upgrade.   Variable speed supply and return fans on the main air‐handling unit (AHU‐1 and REF‐1).   Demand controlled ventilation (DCV) system with return air CO2 monitors   Exhaust air heat recovery on the toilet room, locker room and gym exhaust systems.  4.0 ENVELOPE  4.1 General  The building envelope is more than a polished exterior of glass, concrete and steel. The components  utilized for controlling heat transfer, infiltration, stack effect, solar gain and humidity are vital for a high‐ performance building. Insulated window or door panes whether it is single, double, or triple and “R”  factors has an impact on the loads and efficiencies of mechanical and electrical systems.  A cursory  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 10     review of the existing building envelope and windows was performed to identify any areas which may  benefit from replacement, new weather stripping, caulking and/or seals to prevent infiltration of outside  air.  This review included verifying the proper operation and alignment of windows and doors, checking  for proper levels of insulation where accessible, and noting if any insulation was found to be damaged.   The Department of Energy has identified eight (8) climate zones for the United States.  A list of counties  and their respective climate zones can be found in American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air‐ Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Advanced Energy Design Guide, and in the Department of Energy,  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy VOLUME 7.1 Building America Best Practices Series.  North Pole  High School is a part of Zone 8 which means it is a part of the subarctic climate.  A subarctic climate is  defined as a region with 12,600 heating degree days (65° basis) or more.   For this climate and to achieve  over 30% above ASHRAE Standard 90.1‐1999, R values of between R13 to R60 are recommended  depending on the type and the location of the envelope description.   Window U‐values of .33 are  recommended to exceed energy savings of 30% above ASHRAE standard 90.1‐1999.     4.2 Windows  The windows installed at North Pole High School are the original windows that were installed when the  school was built in 1984. These inefficient windows are twenty‐eight (28) years old and are in need of  replacement.  Many of the window levers have been removed and some of the windows have been  glued shut (Figures 4.2, 4.3, and 4.5).  These levers were removed because many of the windows were  being left opened.  When the windows are left open, it causes the heating system to work harder and  waste heat.  These opened windows often short‐circuits the heating system where the thermostat  thinks that it needs to heat the room, even though the heat is going out the window.  Should an  emergency arise where the only way to escape is through a window, it will be very difficult to exit the  school if the windows are glued shut and the levers are removed.  These problems may result in an  increase in energy consumption, mechanical repairs, equipment replacement, and potential risk of life.  When a window breaks and a work order is submitted, the window maybe replaced with double or  triple pane glass whatever is available.  There is a combination of triple‐pane and double‐pane glass  located throughout the school. Figure 4.6 is a typical example of a double and triple pane installation.   This window is located on the second level near mechanical room 248.  Condensation and air infiltration  are caused at the school due to failure of the window seals.  When a teacher accidently leaves a window  opened one of the cleaning crew must shut it, and when the cleaning crew performs this task it places  them in a precarious position which can be very dangerous because these wood trim windows are tilted  outward.    The window films on these windows have deteriorated with age.  The film is beginning to bubble.  This is  very visible in several of the classrooms on the first floor (Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.4).   Bubbling film is a  sign that the adhesive used to apply the tint to the window is failing. After a single bubble appears,  many more will follow.  The original school was built with windows where the interior part of the  windows were made of wood and the exterior part of the windows were made of hollow metal frames  with 5/8” of rabbeted glazing with a thermal break and u‐value of approximately  .50.  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 11     4.3 Roof  North Pole High School Roof was replaced in 2009 under Project Number 06‐NPHPRJ‐2, IFB Number  08054.  The roof insulation (R‐value) thickness is approximately R‐40 and is made of polyisocyanurate.   Polyisocyanurate is rigid foam that provides continuous thermal insulation barriers for roofs.  The  advantages of using polyisocyanurate are the high R‐value and the good compressive strength.  The  disadvantage is the R‐value degrades over time.   Larger R‐values have greater thermal resistance or  more insulating potential than smaller R‐values.     4.4 Walls  Typical wall insulation at North Pole High School has an R‐value of approximately R‐36.  The wall consists  of 7/8“ Stucco, ½” plywood sheathing, 2” rigid insulation, 8” batt insulation, 2” rigid insulation, vapor  barrier, and 2x8 @24” on center (oc).      4.5 Doors  Air leakage was evident around a few of the doors.  There were ice and snow built up around some of  the doors.  Typical doors are 3’x7’x1¾” wood and hollow metal with ¼” wire‐glass glazing.   4.6  Recommendations  The following items should be implemented to improve the performance and operation of the building’s  envelope:      Window repair/replacement   Behavioral changes/education to eliminate open windows during the heating season   Replace worn and/or broken weather‐stripping around doors     Implementing these potential opportunities will have a holistic impact on mechanical and electrical  systems through building envelope improvements.  Investments in the building envelope will often add  value to the buildings appearance.    Please refer to Appendix D for calculation of building envelope heat transfer properties.              RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 12       Printed below are some of the photos taken during this cursory walkthrough.      Figure 4.1 NPHS Damaged Window Film Figure 4.2 NPHS Broken Levers              Figure 4.3 NPHS Outdated  Window Figure 4.4 NPHS  Damaged Window Film                Figure 4.5 NPHS Damaged Windows               Figure 4.6 NPHS Double/Triple Pane Window       RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 13     5.0 LIGHTING  The most energy efficient lighting systems have already been installed, therefore no additional lighting  upgrades are recommended for this facility.  A detail study was conducted under Project # 09‐NPHPRJ‐1,  IBF #11034.  This detail study was completed in May 2011. The lighting upgrade retrofit project was  implemented during the summer of 2011.  Some of the most energy efficient state of the art lighting  installed consisted of T5 fluorescent lamps and LED’s (reference Figures 5.1‐5.7).  Information on this  recent lighting upgrade is provided in Appendix C .      Skylights are an excellent way to light the commons area and some  corridors using natural light.   Natural daylight provides free lighting  and free heating. Lutron daylight sensors were installed during this  lighting upgrade.  These sensors are designed to harvest natural light  and to maintain specific light levels in the space.  The sensor  automatically dims the lights when the available daylight is high and  brightens the lights when the daylight is low.  This sensor can control  an individual fixture or a group of fixtures and can be programmed  through the daylight sensor’s integrated infrared receiver.  When the  sun permits, the lighting energy consumption in these areas should  be greatly reduced.   We commend you on the LED lighting and the  sensors that were installed during this recent lighting upgrade. The  new lighting should impact the district’s operation and  maintainence(O&M) in a very positve manner.      Printed below are some of the photos taken of the state of the art  energy efficient lighting:                                                                                                                                          Figure 5.1  LED 48‐Watt                                                                                                                                       (TMS  Lighting)       Figure 5.2 Wall Mounted LED Fixture  Figure 5.3 Pole Mounted LED                 (Kim Lighting 120 W‐Wall Pack)                     (Kim Lighting 120 W)         RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 14        Figure 5.4 2‐lamp T5 2x4 Fixture Prismatic Lens Figure 5.5 2x2 Recessed LED Troffer 2‐18.5 LED  (H. E. Williams  lamp inside of Fixture)                               (H. E. Williams  2‐18.5 Powerstick Inside of Fix.)       Figure 5.6 2‐lamp T5 2x4 Fixture Prismatic Lens Figure 5.7  2x2 Recessed LED Troffer 2‐18.5 LED   (H. E. Williams Lighting)                                                          (H. E. Williams Lighting 2‐18.5 Powerstick)  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 15     6.0 MECHANICAL  6.1 Air Handling Systems  North Pole High School is served by several air  handling units located in second floor and  penthouse mechanical rooms.   The main classroom  area is served by a variable volume air handling unit  (AHU‐1).  This air handling unit consists of an  outside air /return air mixing plenum, a glycol  heating coil and a variable speed plug type supply  fan.   The associated variable flow return fan (REF‐1)  is equipped with a variable speed drive and is  located in the same fan room.   The return fan draws  return air into the fan room and discharges it to the  exterior.   Both AHU‐1 and REF‐1 were originally  provided with inlet vanes, which open and close in  response to system demand to vary the flow of air  from the constant speed supply fan.  These inlet vanes have been locked in the open position and  replaced with variable speed drives.  Variable speed drives vary the speed of the fan to provide variable  airflow to the building and consume less energy than the original inlet vanes.  Please refer to Drawing  M1.2 in Appendix E for a diagram of this system.  The Music Area is served by AHU‐2 and REF‐2.   These are similar to the units described above (AHU‐1  and REF‐1), except the original inlet vanes are still in operation.  Both AHU‐1 and AHU‐2 provide air to  individual terminal units at each classroom or temperature control zone.  The terminal units do not have  heating coils and heating is provided by hot water finned tube units on the perimeter and supplemented  by warm air delivered by the main air handling unit.     The auditorium, gymnasium, and locker rooms are  served by individual air handling units (AHU‐3, AHU‐4,  and AHU‐5).  These AHUs have an outside air /return air  mixing plenum, a glycol heating coil and a two speed,  two motor supply fan.   The supply fan switches  between high speed and low speed depending on the  load in the space.  At low speed, the smaller, low rpm  motor runs and at high speed, the larger high rpm  motor runs.  Please refer to Drawing M1.3 in Appendix  E for a diagram of this system.  There are also several heat recovery loops utilized in  the building.  Each loop is a run‐around heat recovery loop which uses a glycol mixture and pump to  transfer heat from the exhaust air stream to the incoming outside air.   Heat is recovered from the toilet  room, locker room and shop exhaust systems.  Refer to drawing M1.4 in Appendix E for a diagram of this  system.  Figure 6.2 – Typical Air Handling Unit Figure 6.1 –Inlet Vanes on REF‐1  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 16     6.2 Heating Systems  Three Weil McLain oil fired cast iron sectional boilers provide heat for the facility.  These boiler and their  associated pumps are located in a ground floor mechanical room.   The boilers are piped in a series  configuration.  This means the output of the first boiler is mixed with the system flow before it enters  the second boiler, and the output of the second is mixed with the system flow prior to entering the third  boiler.   Each boiler raises the temperature of the system flow approximately 14 degrees F.    A constant volume pump distributes heating water to various mechanical rooms.  At each mechanical  room, this water is utilized in one of three ways:  1) Passed through a glycol to hot water heat exchanger via a manual balancing valve to generate  hot glycol for use in the outside air preheat coils.  2) Mixed with return water and distributed to hot water coils in the AHUs via individual coil pumps  and three‐way valves.  3) Pumped to fin tube perimeter heating units via a single pipe “mono‐flo” system through two‐ way valves.    Please refer to Diagram M1.1 in Appendix E for additional information on the heating water distribution  system.          Figure 6.3 ‐ Heating Water Boilers Piped in Series  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 17     6.3 Control Systems  The majority of the mechanical systems are controlled by a Johnson Controls Metasys direct digital  control (DDC) system.  This system was substantially upgraded in 2000.    The DDC system starts and  stops the mechanical equipment, controls space temperature and maintains the proper amount of  outside air flow to accommodate the occupant load at any given time.  Outside air control is  accomplished with the use of CO2 monitoring.   The level of CO2 in the sampled air is an indicator of the  number of occupants in the building.  The DDC system adjusts the outside air dampers to maintain the  CO2 levels at the set point value.    The control of ventilation air based on actual space occupancy is  known as Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) and can be a very effective way to conserve energy by  reducing the amount of outside air introduced into the building.   6.4 Domestic Hot Water  Domestic hot water is generated by three oil fired hot water heaters with combination storage tanks.  These are located in the Boiler Room.    6.5 Mechanical System Trend Logs  With the assistance of FNSB personnel, the operating parameters of a single air handling unit and the  heating water system were monitored and recorded over a period of several days.  This period included  weekday and weekend operation.  The intent of monitoring a select group of points was to determine if  the operation of the mechanical systems was consistent with the assumed schedules and operating  parameters used in the computer simulation model, and to identify any potential energy saving items  that may be candidates for more in depth monitoring and analysis in the future. This data (typically  referred to as a trend log) was taken for AHU‐1, which serves the main classroom and administrative  areas.  Observations for AHU‐1 may or may not apply to the other units that were not monitored.   Certain sections of the trend data were graphed to illuminate items of interest that were noted in our  review of the data collected.  The data points that were monitored during this study were a small  selection of the total number of points available for monitoring in the future.     Since only a small  selection of points were monitored it should be noted that while we were able to calculate the  percentage of outside air from the trend logs, we were not able to determine the total amount of  outside air because the total fan airflow is not known.  AHU‐1 is a variable air volume system, so the  total airflow of the system will vary in response to the opening and closing of the terminal units serving  individual zones.   The following observations are from our analysis of the trend logs:   The supply fan started at 6:00 am and the outside air percentage at this point is around 12%   At 10:00 am the outside air percentage jumped to 35%, indicating that the DCV control is  responding correctly to a buildup of CO2 from the occupants.   At 3:00 pm the outside air damper closed   The supply fan continued to run since the outside air temperature was below minus 20.   The outside air dampers did not close fully during this time and approximately 6% of the air  introduced into the building was outside air.      RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 18     In addition, the operation of the boiler plant was monitored for the same time period.  Analysis of the  boiler plant trend logs shows that the load on the boiler plant peaks when the outside air dampers are  opened, as expected, but the load during the unoccupied hours (when the outside air dampers should  be closed) is still fairly substantial.       Control of the boiler leaving water temperature is not stable and this is causing the system  temperatures to hunt.   During one four hour period on Jan 14th, all boilers were enabled, yet the system  temperature difference varied from between 7 degrees and 17 degrees several times.  Typical variations  would be expected to be in the range of 3‐5 degrees for this type of operating scenario.     Fluctuating  leaving water temperature will cause the heating water valves located at the air handling units to  become unstable and may lead to excessive energy consumption.      Based on our review of trend logs for AHU‐1 and the boiler system, we have the following  recommendations:   Visually inspect the outside air dampers at each air handler to ensure that they are fully closed  during unoccupied hours.   Inspect the control system and sequences related to the heating water supply temperature  control to determine if the control loop can be tuned to reduce the variations in supply water  temperature.    A graphical representation of the operation of AHU‐1 and the boiler plant is included in Appendix I.   7.0 ENERGY USE  The purpose of this energy audit is to identify measures or practices that will result in a reduction in the  energy use of the facility.  Fuel oil is used for building heating and domestic hot water generation, while  electricity is used by fans, pumps, lights, and miscellaneous plug loads.     A reduction in oil use can be achieved by one or more of the following actions:    Reduce the amount of ventilation air being introduced into the building   Reduce the amount of heat lost through the envelope of the building.   Recover heat before it is exhausted from the building.   Improve the efficiency of the oil burning equipment.  A reduction in electrical consumption can be achieved in one or more of the following manners:    Improve the efficiency of the lighting systems.   Vary the speed of fans and pumps in response to the building loads.   Improve the efficiency of the motors.   Turn off systems when they are not required.  Two years of utility bills were analyzed to determine the energy consumption characteristics of the  facility.   These numbers were then normalized to account for any unusual weather conditions that may  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 19     have occurred during the span of the two years.  For example, if the winter of 2010 was abnormally  warm, the yearly energy consumption would be less than that of a typical year.  The number of actual  heating degree days (HDD) for each month during the two year time period was compared to the  historical average heating degree days for that month, and the oil consumption use was adjusted based  on this ratio.  These adjusted energy consumption values were then used to calculate an overall building  energy use index.  The calculated Energy Utilization Index (EUI) for this facility is 75 kBTU/SF.  The EUI  calculation is included in Appendix A.  Figure 7.1 shows a comparison of the existing and proposed EUI  with both the average EUI found in the building operated by the Fairbanks North Star Borough and the  Environmental Protection Agency’s Energy Star rating for a median building of a similar type.  This target  value was developed using the Energy Star Target Finder software and represents the design criteria for  a 50% Energy Star Rated Building, rather than the median value for existing K‐12 Schools.    Figure 7.1 – Building Energy Utilization Index  8.0 ENERGY MEASURES   8.1 Types of Energy Savings Measures  Potential energy saving measures (ECMs and EEMs) were identified for the facility based upon an on‐site  inspection, a review of utility records, computer modeling and interviews with facility personnel.  The  purpose of identifying these energy measures is to reduce energy consumption, and  lower operational  costs.     Each measure was analyzed either by utilizing a spreadsheet calculation or by employing the TRACE  energy‐modeling program.   A rolling baseline modeling system is employed during the modeling  process.  This system analyzes each alternative based on the results of the previous alternative.  The first  alternatives analyzed are the ones thought to be most likely to result in a short payback period.   The  rolling baseline system is used to prevent double accounting of energy savings.  For example, if one  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 20     alternative improves the building envelope and the following alternative increases the efficiency of the  heating system, the second alternative must take into account the decreased heating load provided by  improving the envelope in the first alternative.  If this reduced heating load is not taken into account,  the second alternative would show additional heating energy savings that would not be realized in a  building with an improved envelope.  The following measures were analyzed for this facility:  8.1.1  Energy Conservation Measures:   ECM A – Ventilation System Optimization   ECM B – Replacement of Existing Motors with More Efficient Motors  8.1.2  Energy Efficiency Measures:   EEM 1 – Replace Inlet Vanes with Variable Speed Drive on AHU‐2   EEM 2 – Variable Speed Pumping  A more thorough discussion of each ECM/EEM can be found in Section 9.0.  8.2 Computer Modeling  The TRACE building modeling system examined three alternatives:  8.2.1  Trace Model Alternative One:  Baseline Building  This alternative models the existing facility using information from the most current as built drawings, as  well as information gathered during our field visits.    The existing wall and roof u‐values were calculated  and input into the model.   The existing lighting densities, HVAC system types, airflows and operational  schedules were used.  The energy use predicted by the baseline model was then compared to the actual  utility bills (normalized to reflect an average year) to determine if the model was accurately describing  the operation of the existing facility.   The model was then “tuned” to follow the existing building energy  consumption as closely as possible.  8.2.2  Trace Model Alternative Two: Replace Inlet Vanes with Variable Speed Drives  This alternative examines EEM‐1, locking the existing modulating inlet vanes in the open position and  adding variable speed drives to control the speed of the existing variable air volume fans serving the  Music and Drama Departments (AHU‐2).    8.2.3  Trace Model Alternative Three:  Variable Speed Pumping  This alternative includes all the energy upgrades proposed in Alternative Two, and examines EEM‐2,  variable speed pumping for the main heating water distribution pumps.  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 21     The TRACE 700 computer model input and output data is included in Appendix G and H respectively.  8.3 Energy Costs  The following energy costs were used in this analysis:  Fuel Oil = $3.40/Gallon  Electricity Consumption = $.156 per Kwh  Electrical Demand = $10.79 Kw  Blended Electrical Rate = $.177 per Kwh  9.0 ENERGY MEASURE DESCRIPTIONS  9.1 ECM A – Ventilation Air Reduction  Heating of the outside ventilation air is the primary source of energy use for the facility.  Any actions  taken to reduce the amount of ventilation air introduced into the building will save a significant amount  of energy.    A certain amount of fresh air is required in order to provide adequate indoor air quality, but excessive  amounts of outdoor air lead to increased energy consumption.   This delicate balance between indoor  air quality and energy consumption is perhaps the most important aspect of any energy conservation  project.     The 2009 International Mechanical Code stipulates the minimum outside air requirements for any  facility.  These requirements include a people component and an area component.  For each particular  use, the code specifies a cubic foot per minute of outside air per each occupant (cfm/person) and an  amount of outside air required based on the square footage of the space (cfm/square foot).  Codes that  were in place during the design of this facility typically only included a people component.  The 2009  IMC reduces many of the cfm/person requirements from the original codes in place during the time  construction of this facility.  However, some of the requirements for classrooms have actually increased.   Depending on the balance of classroom to other uses, implementation of the new code may either  increase or decrease the total required amount of outside air for a particular facility.   An excerpt from  the current code is listed below:  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 22       Minimum Ventilation Rates ‐ Schools  Use  2009 IMC Previous  Cfm Cfm People  Net  Cfm Code  Person Sq Ft  1000 Sq  Ft Person Cfm/Per  Classroom (Age 5‐8) 10 0.12 25 14.8 15  Classroom (Age 9+) 10 0.12 35 13.4 15  Science Room 10 0.18 25 17.2 15  Art Classroom 10 0.18 20 19.0 15  Lecture Classroom 7.5 0.06 65 8.4 15  Lecture Hall (Fixed Seats) 7.5 0.06 150 7.9 15  Computer Lab 10 0.12 25 14.8 20  Shops 10 0.18 20 19.0 20  Music/Theater/Dance 10 0.06 35 11.7 20  Multi‐Use/Assembly 7.5 0.06 100 8.1 20  Office 5 0.06 5 17.0 20  If the air handling system provides ventilation air to multiple zones, then several additional calculations  must be performed to determine the fraction of outdoor required at the air handler.  These calculations  provide correction factors for over ventilated zones, air distribution effectiveness and system  efficiencies.   A calculation of the overall percentage of outside air required at each air handler can be  found in Appendix D.  North Pole High School utilizes CO2 sensors in the return air ducts to monitor the ambient CO2 level.   The control system modulates the amount of outside air introduced in the building in proportion to the  number of people in the space at any given time.  This is known as demand controlled ventilation (DCV)  and is the best method to balance the need for adequate indoor air quality with the desire to reduce  energy consumption.     Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a method of adjusting the amount of outside ventilation air  introduced in to the building based on the number of occupants at any given time.  The number of  occupants can be determined indirectly by measuring the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the  air.  Each person produces CO2 at a fairly constant rate, therefore the concentration of CO2 in the return  air system can be used as an indication of the number of people occupying the space.    Measuring the return air CO2 is a relatively inexpensive method of DCV since it requires only one sensor  and minimal control wiring.   However, this method provides an average reading of all the spaces served  by the system.  If one space is fully occupied and the other is empty the average value read in the return  air stream will not be indicative of what is actually happening on a room by room level and some zones  may be over ventilated, while others are under ventilated.    RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 23     The control system monitors the CO2 level in the return air stream and opens the outside air damper  when this level exceeds a certain set point.   This set point is based on a calculation of the minimum  amount of outside air required by code.   The calculation of the maximum allowable CO2 level is  provided in Appendix D.  This CO2 set point should be compared to the current set point and adjusted, if  possible, to reduce the amount of outside air required.   The facility’s air handling units are scheduled to run during unoccupied hours any time the outside air  temperature drops below minus 20 degrees F.   The temperature in Fairbanks is below minus 20 degrees  between the hours of 5 PM and 8 AM (unoccupied hours) for approximately 550 hours per year.  The  control systems are set up to allow a small percentage (approximately 5%) of outside air into the  building during these times in order to keep the building pressurized and prevent any infiltration of cold  air.  This outside air used for pressurization must be heated prior to entering the building.  The heating  of this outside air represents an annual energy cost of approximately $2 per cubic foot per minute (cfm)  of outside air.   For example, if AHU‐1 is bringing in 3000 cfm (5%) of outside air, this would result in an  annual energy cost of $6,000.  Although this pressurization of the building may be required to prevent freeze up and maintenance  issues when the outside air temperatures drop below minus 20 degrees, it does require a substantial  amount of energy to heat the outside air used to pressurize the building.   We recommend revisiting this  practice to determine if the buildings can be operated with little or no outside air (neutral pressure)  during this time in order to reduce the overall building energy consumption.  We also recommend a visual inspection of all the outside air dampers in the facility to verify that they  are closing properly during unoccupied hours.  Also, the seals on these dampers should be inspected to  verify that the damper is not leaking when it is closed.  9.2 ECM B – Energy Efficient Motors  The pay back derived from replacing existing electric motors with premium efficiency motors depends  on the horsepower, the existing motor efficiency, the hours of operation, the type of system and the  location of the existing motor.  Larger motors tend to provide lower pay back periods.  The tables  included in Appendix D provide information on the typical motors used in this facility and indicate the  existing motor efficiency at which the payback period becomes feasible.   For example, if an existing 10  horsepower motor used in a perimeter heating loop has an efficiency less than 87.5%, then replacing  the motor with a premium efficiency model will provide a payback of approximately 5 years.  Motors  used in variable speed systems will have a longer payback than indicated in the charts because the  motor is not operating at full design horsepower for the number of hours indicated.  Additionally motors  located in the airstream of fan systems will also have a slightly longer payback, because the heat  produced by the inefficiency of the motor is used in a beneficial way during the heating season.  Please  refer to the tables to determine the feasibility of replacing other motors used throughout the facility.     Since many of the motor nameplates are obstructed or could not be found, a simple payback calculation  for each motor is not feasible.  However, as maintenance personnel are working in this building, this  chart can be used to determine if the motors should be replaced or re‐used.   RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 24     9.3 EEM 1‐ Add Variable Speed Drives to AHU‐2 and REF‐2  The original design of the variable air volume fans included using modulating vanes on the inlet of each  fan to vary the amount of air produced by the fans by changing the angle of air as it hit the fans blades.   The fans run at full speed but total horsepower required decreases as  the motor unloads.  This  technique saves energy but is not as efficient as simply slowing down the speed of the fan blade by using  variable speed drives.   This EEM includes the following:      Remove inlet vane controller and lock inlet vanes in the open position on AHU‐2 and REF‐2.   Provide new variable speed drives for each fan motor.   Extend the existing DDC control system to incorporate these new points.    9.4 EEM 2 ‐ Add Variable Speed Drives to the Main Heating Water Distribution Pumps  The main heating water distribution system serves several different heating water systems throughout  the building.  One of which is the heat exchangers that serve the glycol heating water distribution  systems.   Manual balancing valves currently control the main system heating water flow that passes  through these heat exchangers.  This results in a constant flow of heating water through the system  even if there is not a demand for heating.   This alternative includes the following work:     Replace the manual balancing valves on the  water to glycol heat exchangers with electric 2‐  Way control valves.   Replace 3‐Way valves on coil pumps with 2‐Way  Valves for AHU‐1, AHU‐2, AHU‐3 and AHU‐4.   Provide new variable speed drives for each pump  motor.   Extend the existing DDC control system to  incorporate control of the drives based on system  pressure.    This measure will reduce the system pumping energy by  varying the heating water flow in response to the actual  building heating loads.   Refer to Drawing M.1A in   Appendix E for a diagram of the proposed changes.     10.0 SIMPLE PAYBACK AND SIR  The total energy saved by employing Energy Conservations Measures ECM‐A, Ventilation Air Reduction  and ECM‐B, Energy Efficient Motors, could not be calculated.  Calculation of the total energy saved from  implementing ECM‐A requires detailed data monitoring and analysis of each individual air handling  system in order to determine the existing energy consumption of each unit.  Calculation of the total  energy saved by employing ECM B could not be performed since many of the motor nameplates were  inaccessible or missing during our walkthrough.  This level of detailed analysis is beyond the scope of a  Level II audit and is typically performed during a Level III Audit.  Therefore, simple payback and Savings  Figure 9.1 – Typical Coil Pump and  3‐Way Valve  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 25     to Investment Ratio (SIR) calculations are not presented for the recommended Energy Conservation  Measures (ECMs).    The simple payback and SIR were calculated for each of the Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) studied  in this report.   The estimated installed cost for each proposed energy efficiency measure (EEM) was  compared to the estimated energy savings to provide a relative comparison of each measure.     The simple payback calculation is a quick method of comparing various EEMs but does not take into  account the time value of money or the costs or savings beyond the first cost.    The savings‐to‐investment ratio (SIR) is the ratio of the present value savings to the present value costs  of an energy conservation measure. The numerator of the ratio is the present value of net savings in  energy plus or minus any additional maintenance costs related to the measure.   The denominator of the  ratio is the present value of the installation cost of the measure.    The following formulas were used in the calculation of each ratio:  Simple Payback = Cost of Energy Saved/Cost of Installation of EEM   SIR = Present Value of Energy Saved for the Life of the Measure/Present Value of the Installed Cost  NORTH POLE HIGH SCHOOL ‐ EEM SUMMARY  Measure  Number Measure Description  Annual Energy and Cost Savings Payback Calculations  Peak  Demand  Savings  Electricity  Usage  Savings  Oil  Usage  Savings  Annual  Cost  Savings  Measure  Cost  Simple  Payback  Savings  to  Invest  Ratio  Kw Kwh Therms $ $ Yrs    EEM 1 Variable Speed Fans  3 14,548 0 $2,302 $18,000 7.8 1.8  EEM 2 Variable Speed Pumps 11 118,038 0 $18,533 $60,000 3.2 4.4  11.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE  A successful operations and maintenance plan is the key to continued energy savings in any facility.   According to the American Society of Heating and Refrigeration Engineers (ASHRAE) 2007 Handbook,  the original design and installation of a mechanical system constitutes only around 10% of the total life  cycle cost, while operation and maintenance costs represent approximately 80% of the total cost over  the life of the system.   The remaining 10% of the life cycle cost is attributed to acquisition, renewal and  disposal.   When a mechanical system is installed, it should be commissioned to ensure that the operation of the  system meets the design intent.  Over the life of this system, its operation should be verified via control  system trending and/or field measurements.  If the system is found to be operating outside of the  original design intent, corrective action or retro commissioning should be initiated.  RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 26     A quality preventative maintenance plan can extend the life of the mechanical system beyond the  estimated service life of the equipment and free up capital funds for other projects.  Frequent filter  changes can result in significant energy savings over the life of the building.  The pressure drop across  the filter increases as it captures dirt and dust.   This increased pressure drop results in additional energy  consumption, a decrease in airflow, or both.  For a typical 20,000 cfm fan system a 1” static pressure  increase will result in an increased annual energy cost of $2000.  The level of maintenance at the North Pole High School appears to be excellent.  The level of quality of  the installed Pace custom air handlers is very high, and there were no visible signs of wear or of any  maintenance problems.  The mechanical spaces are clean and well kept and the filters appear to have  been changed frequently.    12.0 RECOMMENDATIONS  The lighting systems at North Pole High School have been recently upgraded, therefore, no additional  lighting measures are recommended for this facility.   The current windows are 28 years old and are  beginning to fail.  Several have been replaced with more energy efficient windows as they have failed  and several have had only the glass contents replaced.  We recommend replacing the remaining original  windows to decrease the infiltration of cold air and to improve the thermal performance of the building  envelope.  We also recommend implementation of an education and monitoring program to ensure that  the windows remain closed during the heating season.      In addition, we recommend further analysis of the following Energy Conservation Measures:     ECM A   Ventilation Air Reductions   Verify that the maximum CO2 set points used in the Demand Controlled  Ventilation (DCV) control scheme are in agreement with current codes.  It is  possible that some of the set points may be increased, which will reduce the  amount of outside air needed.   Revisit the practice of pressurizing the building in cold weather during  unoccupied hours.  This practice may be required to prevent freeze up or  damage, but any reduction in the amount of pressurization required will  result in substantial energy savings.       Inspect and repair all outside air dampers that may be leaking or not closing  properly to prevent introduction of un‐wanted outside air during unoccupied  hours.      The majority of the facility energy use can be attributed to the heating of the  outside air as it is introduced into the building.  Therefore, anything that can be  done to reduce this outside airflow will have the greatest impact on the overall  energy consumption of the facility.    RS Consulting  Energy Audit – Final Report  Edwards Energy Engineering &  North Pole High School  Waste Management  North Pole, Alaska         July 30, 2012  Page 27        ECM B  Replace Low Efficiency Motors  Where Applicable  Replace motors that do not meet the minimum efficiency criteria as listed in the  Table provided in Appendix D.    We recommend implementation of the following Energy Efficiency Measures:     EEM 1  Add Variable Speed Drives to AHU‐2 and REF‐2  The variable volume fans serving AHU‐2 and REF‐2 are currently controlled by  inefficient inlet vanes.   Replacing these inlet vanes with variable speed drives  will reduce the overall fan energy consumption.       EEM 2  Variable Speed Pumping on the Main Heating System  Electrical energy consumption will be reduced significantly by converting the  existing constant volume heating water pumps located in the main boiler room  to variable volume pumps.    APPENDIX A – ENERGY UTILIZATION INDEX Building Square Footage 156,362 Estimated Estimated Estimated Actual Average Total Delivered Monthly Monthly Monthly Base 60 Base 60 Cost Per Cost per Energy Use Date Gallons kbtu Cost Cost/Mbtu Cost/Gal Use (Gal)kbtu-Oil Cost HDD HDD KWH kbtu-Elec Cost KWH kbtu kbtu Jan-09 11,166 1,506,852 19,098$0.013$1.710$8,010 1,080,979 18,092$2182 2236 171,000 583,452 24,146$0.141$0.041$1,664,431 Feb-09 5,690 767,866 10,447$0.014$1.836$6,182 834,266 13,963$1684 1709 154,800 528,178 16,114$0.104$0.031$1,362,443 Mar-09 4,631 624,953 7,920$0.013$1.710$6,035 814,449 13,631$1644 1652 147,600 503,611 15,863$0.107$0.031$1,318,061 Apr-09 0 0 -$--3,117 420,601 7,039$849 775 153,900 525,107 15,896$0.103$0.030$945,708 May-09 0 0 -$--1,072 144,659 2,421$292 287 119,700 408,416 16,538$0.138$0.040$553,075 Jun-09 0 0 -$--308 41,614 696$84 93 89,100 304,009 12,487$0.140$0.041$345,623 Jul-09 406 54,790 844$0.015$2.079$110 14,862 249$30 59 91,800 313,222 12,750$0.139$0.041$328,084 Aug-09 0 0 8,420$--753 101,558 1,700$205 166 113,400 386,921 18,661$0.165$0.048$488,479 Sep-09 0 0 -$--1,428 192,713 3,225$389 398 139,500 475,974 21,791$0.156$0.046$668,687 Oct-09 8,088 1,091,476 18,408$0.017$2.276$3,396 458,252 7,669$925 1076 153,000 522,036 23,574$0.154$0.045$980,288 Nov-09 7,811 1,054,094 19,184$0.018$2.456$6,645 896,687 15,007$1810 1716 150,300 512,824 25,856$0.172$0.050$1,409,511 Dec-09 6,389 862,196 15,465$0.018$2.421$7,125 961,585 16,094$1941 2064 139,500 475,974 24,960$0.179$0.052$1,437,559 Jan-10 9,239 1,246,803 22,694$0.018$2.456$8,735 1,178,781 23,123$2292 2236 166,500 568,098 28,686$0.172$0.050$1,746,879 Feb-10 4,151 560,177 10,047$0.018$2.420$6,098 822,883 16,141$1600 1709 153,900 525,107 26,750$0.174$0.051$1,347,990 Mar-10 4,583 618,476 13,479$0.022$2.941$5,663 764,253 14,991$1486 1652 149,400 509,753 26,687$0.179$0.052$1,274,006 Apr-10 0 0 -$--2,249 303,438 5,952$590 775 153,000 522,036 26,202$0.171$0.050$825,474 May-10 0 0 -$--953 128,576 2,522$250 287 109,800 374,638 20,081$0.183$0.054$503,213 Jun-10 6,324 853,424 16,101$0.019$2.546$354 47,830 938$93 93 56,700 193,460 11,323$0.200$0.059$241,291 Jul-10 6,000 809,700 15,906$0.020$2.651$217 29,315 575$57 59 67,500 230,310 12,806$0.190$0.056$259,625 Aug-10 1,726 232,924 4,662$0.020$2.701$442 59,659 1,170$116 166 109,800 374,638 19,495$0.178$0.052$434,297 Sep-10 0 0 -$--1,620 218,578 4,288$425 398 142,200 485,186 23,663$0.166$0.049$703,765 Oct-10 4,731 638,448 13,157$0.021$2.781$3,849 519,445 10,189$1010 1076 149,400 509,753 25,180$0.169$0.049$1,029,198 Nov-10 4,515 609,299 12,632$0.021$2.798$5,366 724,137 14,204$1408 1716 151,200 515,894 25,280$0.167$0.049$1,240,032 Dec-10 3,469 468,142 9,750$0.021$2.811$9,192 1,240,497 24,333$2412 2064 139,500 475,974 23,324$0.167$0.049$1,716,471 Heating Deg DaysFuel Oil Use Electrical Use North Pole High School Energy Use Index Dec-10 3,469 468,142 9,750$0.021$2.811$9,192 1,240,497 24,333$2412 2064 139,500 475,974 23,324$0.167$0.049$1,716,471 Avg Cost 2009 44,181 5,962,226 99,786$0.015$2.259$44,181 5,962,226 99,786$12,035 12,231 1,623,600 5,539,723 228,636$Avg Cost Avg Cost 11,501,949 2010 44,738 6,037,393 118,428$0.022$2.647$44,738 6,037,393 118,428$11,739 12,231 1,548,900 5,284,847 269,477$Per KWH Per Mbtu 11,322,240 Averages 44,460 5,999,810 109,107$0.019$2.453$44,460 5,999,810 109,107$11,887 12,231 1,586,250 5,412,285 249,057$0.166$0.049$22,824,189 Energy Adjusted Energy Use( MBH)Oil Elect Total BTU/SF For HDD Oil Electric Total 2009 5,962,226 5,539,723 11,501,949 73,560 74,758 Average Annual Utility Costs 109,107$249,057$358,164$ 2010 6,037,393 5,284,847 11,322,240 72,410 75,445 Utility Costs per Square Foot 0.70$1.59$2.29$ Average 75,100 North Pole High School Energy Use Index APPENDIX B – COST ESTIMATE RS Consulting Opinion of Probable Cost Job:North Pole High School Date: 2-May-12 Job #:Status of Design:Energy Audit Est: RWS QTY UNIT MATERIAL LABOR ENGINEERING EST DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL EEM Provide Variable Speed Drives for AHU-2 and REF-2 Remove Existing Vane Acuators 2 EA 450 900 450 $900 Provide VSD for AHU-2 (15 Hp)* 1 EA 1546 1546 450 450 1996 $1,996 Provide VSD for REF-2 (3 Hp)*1 EA 1050 1050 450 450 1500 $1,500 Electrical Wiring 1 EA 425 425 3000 3000 3425 $3,425 Modify DDC Control Signal 1 EA 250 250 1200 1200 1450 $1,450 Control Wiring and Conduit 1 EA 150 150 800 800 950 $950 Controls Programming and Test 1 EA 1250 1250 1250 $1,250 * Reuse Exisitng Motor Subtotal $11,471 General Conditions 25% $2,868 $14,339 Construction Contingency 15% $2,151 $16,490 Design 12%$1,979 $18,468 Total for EEM $18,468 Round to $18,000 EEM Variable Speed Pumps Remove Exist Bal Valves @ HX 3 EA 400 1200 400 $1,200 Remove Exist 3-Way Vlv @ Coils 3 EA 500 1500 500 $1,500 Add Heating Water Temp Sensor 3 EA 425 1275 200 600 625 $1,875 Add 2 Way Control Valves at HX 3 EA 1500 4500 450 1350 1950 $5,850 Add 2 Way Cntrl Valve at Coils 3 EA 1500 4500 450 1350 1950 $5,850 Add Variable Speed Drives (15 HP)* 2 EA 1546 3092 650 1300 2196 $4,392 Electrical Wiring for Drives 2 EA 350 700 1500 3000 1850 $3,700 Provide DDC Pipe Press Sensor 1 EA 1250 1250 1100 1100 2350 $2,350 Control Wiring and Conduit 1 EA 450 450 2500 2500 2950 $2,950 Controls Programming and Test 1 EA 7500 7500 7500 $7,500 * Reuse Exisitng Motor Subtotal $37,167 General Conditions 25% $9,292 $46,459 Construction Contingency 15% $6,969 $53,428 Design 12%$6,411 $59,839 Total for EEM $59,839 Round to $60,000 APPENDIX D – MECHANICAL CALCULATIONS U-VALUE CALCULATIONS RS Consulting Seattle, Washington Job Name: North Pole High School Date: 4-May-12 Job Number:Eng: R. Sneeringer Wall -1 Construction Resistance (R) At Frame Btwn Frame 15% 85% 1) Outside Air Film (15 mph)0.17 0.17 2) 1" Stucco 0.64 0.64 3) 1/2" Plywood 0.62 0.62 4) 2x8 Wood Stud @ 24 OC 9.09 -- 5) R-25 Batt -- 25.00 6) 2" Rigid Insul 8.00 8.00 7) 5/8" Sheetrock 0.56 0.56 8) Inside Air Film (still air)0.68 0.68 R-Total 19.76 35.67 Wall U-Value 0.031 Wall - 2 Construction Resistance (R) At Frame Btwn Frame 15% 85% 1) Outside Air Film (15 mph)0.17 0.17 2) 1" Stucco 0.64 0.64 3) 1/2" Plywood 0.62 0.62 4) 2" Rigid 8.00 8.00 5) 2x8 Wood Stud @ 24 OC 9.09 -- 6) R-25 Batt -- 24.00 7) 8" CMU 1.93 1.93 8) Inside Air Film (still air)0.68 0.68 R-Total 21.13 36.04 * Effectiveness of Insulation is Reduced by Metal Stud Thermal Path Wall U-Value 0.031 U-VALUE CALCULATIONS RS Consulting Seattle, Washington Job Name: North Pole High School Date: 4-May-12 Job Number:Eng: R. Sneeringer Roof-1: Construction Resistance (R) At Frame Btwn Frame 100% 1) Outside Air Film (15 mph)-- 0.17 2) Built Up Roofing -- 0.50 3) 20" Rigid Insulation (Avg)-- 40.00 4) Metal Deck ---- 5) Inside Air Film (still air)-- 0.17 R-Total N/A 40.84 Roof U-Value 0.024 Floor:Existing Slab /Grade Resistance (R) Construction At Frame Btwn Frame Insulated Slab Edge N/A R-Total Btu/deg f/lin ft Floor U-Value 0.550 Windows:Triple Pane Construction 1) Wood/Aluminum Frame with Thermal Break 2) Use Value from ASHRAE Table 13 1989 Window U-Value 0.500 Shading Coefficient 0.55 Clear Glazing with Film Building Envelope - Calculations and Common Conversions • U-Value = 1/R-Value • R-Values per Inch of Common Insulation Materials Fiberglass Blanket 3.2 Loose Fiberglass 2.5 Fiberglass Blown-in-Bat 4.0 Loose Rock Wool 2.8 Loose Cellulose 3.5 Wet-Spray Cellulose 3.9 Vermiculite 2.7 Polyisocyanurate 5.8 Expanded Polystyrene (bead board) 3.8 Extruded Polystyrene (blue board) 4.8 Foil Faced Polyisocyanurate 7.0 Spray applied Foam 6.0 U value = btu’s/ Hour x sq ft x deg F = 1/R R value = Hours x sq ft x deg F / BTU’s= 1/U q (Building heat loss in btu’s/hr)= U x A x Delta T = U x A x DD x 24 (annual heat loss) Sample Calculations: Building Envelope-Heat Transfer Calculations R- “Resistance value” of building materials to heat flow RT = R inside film + R1 + R2 +… R outside film U-value: “overall heat transfer co-efficient” (Includes allowance for BOTH convection and conduction heat transfer) U = 1/ RT Sample Calculation 1: Windows: window area is 1000 square feet Window is triple pane; U = .27 Q = A * U * (Ti – To) Where Q = Total hourly rate of heat loss through walls, roof, glass, etc in Btu/hr U = Overall heat-transfer coefficient of walls, roof, ceiling, floor, or glass in Btu/hr ft2°F A = Net area of walls, roof, ceiling, floor, or glass in ft2 Ti = Inside design temperature in °F = 70 To = Outside design temperature in °F = 30 Q = U * A * delta T = .27 x 1000 x (70 – 30) = .27 x 1000 x 40 = 10,800 Btu/hour Sample Calculation 2: For sample calculations- outside design = 30 F, inside design = 70 F Walls: wall area is 1000 square feet Wall is wood stud with R-30 insulation; U = 0.033 Q = U x A x delta T = 0.033 x 1000 x (70 – 30) = 0.033 x 1000 x 40 = 1333.3 Btu/hour Radiation heat gain thru windows Q = (A) x (SHGF) x (CLF) x (SC) Where: Q = heat transfer in BTU/HR A = window area in ft2 SHGF= solar heat gain factor (dependent on orientation and location) CLF = cooling load factor (dependent on shading and color of interior surface) SC = shading coefficient (property of glazing; dependent on clear/tinted/mirror glass surface) Other ratings- SHGC = solar heat gain coefficient = SC x 0.86 Glazing selection – Single pane vs. dual/triple pane Single pane- “U” = 1.10 Dual pane- “U” = 0.35 Triple pane- “U” = 0.22 (NOTE effect of interior “films” at glass surfaces; insulation value increases due to air space and number of surface films) – “low E” glass coating that allows light to get thru but not heat Glazing Selection SHGC- Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (% of ALL radiation (UV, visible and IR) that gets thru glass) VT- Visible Transmittance (% of visible light that gets thru glass) SOUTH FACING GLAZING: – Cold climate: SHGC > 0.6; high VT; low “U” – Moderate climate: SHGC < 0.6; high VT; low “U” – Hot climate: SHGC < 0.4; medium VT; low “U” – East/west facing: SHGC < 0.4; high VT; low “U” Job Name:North Pole High School Job Number: Date:30-Apr-12 Zone Zone Area Ceil Ht Room Zone SA OA Zone Zone OA Current Primary Zone No. Description Sf Ft Vol cf Cfm Density Total cfm/per cfm cfm/sf cfm Vbz Eff (Ez) Voz Design OA Fract Served Az V Vpz #/1000 sf Pz Rp Ra Vbz Ez Voz OSA Zp By 113 Business/Typing 1,513 9 13,617 2,600 33 50 10 500 0.12 180 680 0.8 850 33% AHU-1 114 Drivers Ed/Simulator 1,472 9 13,248 1,620 14 20 10 200 0.12 180 380 0.8 480 30% AHU-1 115 Power/mech/elect lab/auto 1,501 9 13,509 1,220 8 12 10 120 0.12 180 300 0.8 380 31% AHU-1 116 Corridor 6,842 10 68,420 1,200 0 0 0 0 0.06 410 410 0.8 510 43% AHU-1 117 Voc Ed/Din/Living/Drafting class 2,444 9 21,996 2,770 33 80 10 800 0.12 290 1,090 0.8 1,360 49% AHU-1 118 Home economics 2,652 9 23,868 4,680 30 80 10 800 0.12 320 1,120 0.8 1,400 30% AHU-1 119 Biology 1,300 9 11,700 2,210 31 40 10 400 0.18 230 630 0.8 790 36% AHU-1 120 Biology/Earth Science/Chem stg 2,968 9 26,712 3,500 27 80 10 800 0.18 530 1,330 0.8 1,660 47% AHU-1 121 Bio/Earth Sci/Earth Phys/Chem 4,336 9 39,024 5,000 28 120 10 1200 0.18 780 1,980 0.8 2,480 50% AHU-1 122 Biology/Animal and Plant 1,278 9 11,502 1,980 27 35 10 350 0.18 230 580 0.8 730 37% AHU-1 125 Corridor 4,020 9 36,180 1,200 0 0 0 0 0.06 240 240 0.8 300 25% AHU-1 126 Recp/Sec/Princ/VP/Offices 1,680 9 15,120 830 9 15 5 75 0.06 100 175 0.8 220 27% AHU-1 127 Kitchen/Food Strg/Dish wash 1,976 9 17,784 1,050 5 10 5 50 0.06 120 170 0.8 210 20% AHU-1 128 Commons 8,819 9 79,371 5,500 28 250 5 1250 0.06 530 1,780 0.8 2,230 41% AHU-1 129 Faculty Lounge/Fac Prep 2,352 9 21,168 2,425 11 25 5 125 0.06 140 265 0.8 330 14% AHU-1 202 Math 3,618 8.6 31,115 5,500 33 120 10 1200 0.12 430 1,630 2.8 580 11% AHU-1 203 Social Studies 3,618 8.6 31,115 5,250 33 120 10 1200 0.12 430 1,630 3.8 430 8% AHU-1 204 Math/Computer/Prep 2,070 8.6 17,802 2,060 33 68 10 680 0.12 250 930 4.8 190 9% AHU-1 205 Learn dis/off/testing/computer 4,318 8.6 37,135 2,000 5 20 10 200 0.12 520 720 5.8 120 6% AHU-1 206 Corridor 4,603 8.6 39,586 1,200 0 0 0 0 0.06 280 280 0.8 350 29% AHU-1 207 Social Studies/Language 3,561 8.6 30,625 5,280 34 120 10 1200 0.12 430 1,630 0.8 2,040 39% AHU-1 208 Language/Fine Art 2,417 8.6 20,786 3,930 33 80 10 800 0.12 290 1,090 0.8 1,360 35% AHU-1 209 Language 3,195 8.6 27,477 2,565 25 80 10 800 0.12 380 1,180 0.8 1,480 58% AHU-1 210 Library 5,288 8.6 45,477 4,210 25 130 5 650 0.06 320 970 8.8 110 3% AHU-1 211 Conference room 624 8.6 5,366 260 16 10 5 50 0.06 40 90 6.8 10 4% AHU-1 212 Corridor 4,721 8.6 40,601 735 0 0 0 0 0.06 280 280 7.8 40 5% AHU-1 123 Conference Room 376 9 3,384 560 27 10 5 50 0.06 20 70 0.8 90 16% AHU-2 124 Recp/Off/Nurse/Exam 1,200 9 10,800 1,200 13 15 5 75 0.06 70 145 0.8 180 15% AHU-2 130 Boys/Girls dressing rooms 1,131 9 10,179 1,170 11 12 5 60 0.06 70 130 0.8 160 14% AHU-2 131 Band 1,056 20.6 21,754 2,165 28 30 10 300 0.06 60 360 0.8 450 21% AHU-2 132 Choral/Band offices/storage 1,860 9 16,740 1,070 16 30 10 300 0.06 110 410 0.8 510 48% AHU-2 133 Choir 1,288 18 23,184 2,285 23 30 10 300 0.06 80 380 0.8 480 21% AHU-2 143 Drama Classroom 900 9 8,100 690 33 30 10 300 0.06 50 350 0.8 440 64% AHU-2 213 Crafts 1,537 8.6 13,218 1,370 20 30 10 300 0.18 280 580 8.8 70 5% AHU-2 215 Media graphics/Photo lab 3,170 9 28,530 1,820 5 15 10 150 0.12 380 530 10.8 50 3% AHU-2 216 Control room 594 8.6 5,108 1,000 7 4 5 20 0.06 40 60 11.8 10 1% AHU-2 134 Stage 1,647 47.2 77,762 4,000 7 12 5 60 0.06 100 160 0.8 200 5% AHU-3 135 Auditorium 4,544 47.2 214,477 13,380 77 350 5 1750 0.06 270 2,020 0.8 2,530 19% AHU-3 101 Gymnasiums/Storage/Wght rm 13,068 28.8 376,358 36,000 38 500 7.5 3750 0.06 780 4,530 0.8 5,660 16% AHU-4 102 PE/Coaches/Training/Dressing 2,280 9 20,520 2,180 2 5 5 25 0.06 140 165 0.8 210 10% AHU-5 103 Boys/Girls Locker rooms 3,164 9 28,476 5,520 6 20 5 100 0.06 190 290 0.8 360 7% AHU-5 104 Ski/Classrooms/PE Storage 1,290 9 11,610 1,100 19 25 10 250 0.12 150 400 0.8 500 45% AHU-5 130A Screen Room 823 10 8,225 1,000 18 15 5 75 0.06 50 125 0.8 160 16% FCU-1 2009 IMC MINIMUM OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS From 2009 IMC Table 403.3 Number of Occ People Rate Area Rate Job Name:North Pole High School Job Number: Date:30-Apr-12 Zone Zone Area Ceil Ht Room Zone SA OA Zone Zone OA Current Primary Zone No. Description Sf Ft Vol cf Cfm Density Total cfm/per cfm cfm/sf cfm Vbz Eff (Ez) Voz Design OA Fract Served Az V Vpz #/1000 sf Pz Rp Ra Vbz Ez Voz OSA Zp By 2009 IMC MINIMUM OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS From 2009 IMC Table 403.3 Number of Occ People Rate Area Rate 106 Wood shop 2,634 9 23,706 3,000 15 40 10 400 0.18 470 870 0.8 1,090 36% FCU-2 108 Auto shop 3,157 9 28,413 4,500 13 40 10 400 0.18 570 970 0.8 1,210 27% FCU-3 109 Metal shop 3,234 0 0 4,300 12 40 10 400 0.18 580 980 0.8 1,230 29% FCU-4 110 Drivers Ed/Agriculuture lab 3,552 0 0 2,100 11 40 10 400 0.12 430 830 0.8 1,040 50% FCU-5 111 Agriculuture class/storage/off 1,323 9 11,907 1,380 26 35 10 350 0.12 160 510 0.8 640 46% FCU-5 105 Boiler rm/Storage/Recv/Wkrm 2,646 9 23,814 1,635 0 0 0 0 0.06 160 160 0.8 200 12% V-4 136 Vestibule 504 8 4,032 1,100 0 0 0 0 0.06 30 30 0.8 40 4% VCH 137 Vestibule 184 8 1,472 550 0 0 0 0 0.06 10 10 0.8 10 2% VCH 138 Vestibule 64 8 512 550 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0.8 0 0% VCH 139 Vestibule 80 8 640 550 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0.8 0 0% VCH 140 Vestibule 80 8 640 550 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0.8 0 0% VCH 141 Vestibule 162 8 1,296 550 0 0 0 0 0.06 10 10 0.8 10 2% VCH 142 Vestibule 64 8 512 550 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0.8 0 0% VCH 112 Green house 1,158 0 0 10,840 9 10 0 0 0.06 70 70 0.8 90 1% VF-1,-2 141,956 179,440 23,265 13,440 38,260 0 Job Name:North Pole High School Job Number: Date:30-Apr-12 Zone Zone Area Ceil Ht Room Zone SA OA Zone Zone OA Current Primary Zone No. Description Sf Ft Vol cf Cfm Density Total cfm/per cfm cfm/sf cfm Vbz Eff (Ez) Voz Design OA Fract Served Az V Vpz #/1000 sf Pz Rp Ra Vbz Ez Voz OSA Zp By 2009 IMC MINIMUM OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATIONS From 2009 IMC Table 403.3 Number of Occ People Rate Area Rate Area Primary Tot Tot Diversity Total Uncrtd Max Vent Total OA Design Design OA OA Avg CO2 TAG SERVES Served Air People People of People OA OSA Zp Eff OSA Percent OSA OSA Cfm/Per Cfm/Sf Met Setting SF Cfm Zone Pz Sys Ps D Voz Vou %Ev Vot %Ros Rate AHU-1 Classrooms 83,186 70,775 1,565 600 38% 20,640 7,913 58% 0.50 15,826 22% n/a n/a 10 0.19 1.2 1,200 AHU-2 Music 13,112 13,330 206 180 87% 2,440 2,132 64% 0.50 4,264 32% n/a n/a 21 0.33 1.2 700 AHU-3 Auditorium 6,191 17,380 362 360 99% 2,730 2,715 19% 0.90 3,017 17% n/a n/a 8 0.49 1.2 1,400 AHU-4 Gym/Weight Room 13,068 36,000 500 500 100% 5,660 5,660 16% 0.90 6,289 17% n/a n/a 13 0.48 2.0 1,500 AHU-5 Locker Rooms 4,454 6,620 45 45 100% 860 860 45% 0.60 1,433 22% n/a n/a 32 0.32 1.2 600 120,011 144,105 0 0 0 0 Based on 2009 IMC Az Area of the zone (sq ft)ASHRAE 62.1, 2007 Appendix A-2: Pz Zone population Table A-A Typical Met Levels For Activities Rp Outdoor air required per person (Table 6.1)MET ACTIVITY Ra Outdoor air required per unit area (Table 6.1)1.0 Seated, quiet Vbz The design outdoor airflow in the breathing zone ( people factor plus area factor in accordance with Table 6.1)1.0 Reading and Writing, seated Voz The design outdoor airflow supplied to the zone ( Vbc/Ez)1.1 Typing Vou Uncorrected outdoor intake (sum of all zones served by the ahu times the occupanct diversity D)1.2 Filing, Seated Vot Design outdoor intake flow ( Vou/Ev)1.4 Filing, Standing Ez Zone air distribution effectiveness in accordance with Table 403.3.1.2 2.0 Walking, at 0.89m/s Ev System ventilation efficency ( Per table 403.2.2.3.2)2-3 House Cleaning Short Term Conditions 3-4 Exercise If the peak occupancy will be of short duration, the design may be based on the average condtions over a time period T. T Averaging time period , min ( 3v/Vbz) V Volume of the zone , cu ft CO2 Calculations Cru - C0 = 1,000,000 x Nb x M / Ros Calculates rise in CO2 concentration if all supplied outdoor air is consumed. Cs-C0 = Zs x 0 + (1-Zs) x (Cru - C0)Calculates target SA CO2 concentration (above ambient) based on previous calculation. Cru = CO2 concentration in recirculated air if all outdoor air supplied to the building is used. C0 = CO2 concentration outdoors. Nb = CO2 generation rate per person at base metabolic rate. Default = 0.0091 CFM/Person (0.0043 L/s per person). M = Relative metabolic rate in met units. Default is sedentary person = 1.2 mets, ASHRAE standard 62.1-2007, Appendix C. 400 Ambient CO2 Concentration 10%Safety Factor 0.0091 CO2 Generation Rate Ros = OA Dilution Per Person (Vot / Population Served) Motor Upgrades Feasiblity Analysis Blended Electrical Cost $0.177 Maximum Acceptable Payback 5 Years Ratio of BHP to Motor HP 75% Estimated Annual Hours of Operation 3700 Exist Est Replace if Proposed Required Proposed Required Required Proposed Required Motor Brake Motor Eff New Existing Energy Energy An Energy Motor Simple Hp Hp Is Less Motor Energy Consump Savings Savings Instalation Payback Than Eff Cons KWh KWH KWH $Costs Yrs 1 0.75 68.0%85.5%3,042 2,420 621 110$550$5.0 1.5 1.13 72.4%86.5%4,289 3,588 701 124$620$5.0 2 1.50 74.9%86.5%5,525 4,785 740 131$655$5.0 3 2.25 79.9%89.5%7,772 6,936 836 148$740$5.0 5 3.75 83.3%89.5%12,414 11,560 853 151$755$5.0 7.5 5.63 85.2%91.0%18,207 17,055 1,153 204$1,020$5.0 10 7.50 86.3%91.7%23,979 22,566 1,412 250$1,250$5.0 15 11.25 88.1%93.0%35,240 33,376 1,864 330$1,650$5.0 20 15.00 88.3%93.0%46,874 44,501 2,373 420$2,100$5.0 25 18.75 88.5%93.6%58,457 55,270 3,186 564$2,820$5.0 30 22.50 89.7%94.1%69,192 65,972 3,220 570$2,850$5.0 40 30.00 90.2%94.1%91,804 87,962 3,842 680$3,400$5.0 50 37.50 90.8%94.5%114,007 109,488 4,520 800$4,000$5.0 60 45.00 91.4%95.0%135,846 130,694 5,153 912$4,560$5.0 75 56.25 91.3%95.0%169,989 163,367 6,621 1,172$5,860$5.0 100 75 91.9%95.4%225,249 216,910 8,339 1,476$7,380$5.0 Main Building Fan Systems Motor Upgrades Feasiblity Analysis Blended Electrical Cost $0.177 Maximum Acceptable Payback 5 Years Ratio of BHP to Motor HP 75% Estimated Annual Hours of Operation 5270 Exist Est Replace if Proposed Required Proposed Required Required Proposed Required Motor Brake Motor Eff New Existing Energy Energy Energy Motor Simple Hp Hp Is Less Motor Energy Consump Savings Savings Instalation Payback Than Eff Cons KWh KWH KWH $Costs Yrs 1 0.75 72.4%85.5%4,069 3,447 621 110$550$5.0 1.5 1.13 76.1%86.5%5,812 5,111 701 124$620$5.0 2 1.50 78.0%86.5%7,555 6,815 740 131$655$5.0 3 2.25 82.5%89.5%10,716 9,879 836 148$740$5.0 5 3.75 85.1%89.5%17,319 16,466 853 151$755$5.0 7.5 5.63 86.9%91.0%25,444 24,292 1,153 204$1,020$5.0 10 7.50 87.8%91.7%33,554 32,142 1,412 250$1,250$5.0 15 11.25 89.5%93.0%49,403 47,538 1,864 330$1,650$5.0 20 15.00 89.6%93.0%65,757 63,385 2,373 420$2,100$5.0 25 18.75 90.0%93.6%81,909 78,723 3,186 564$2,820$5.0 30 22.50 91.0%94.1%97,186 93,965 3,220 570$2,850$5.0 40 30.00 91.3%94.1%129,129 125,287 3,842 680$3,400$5.0 50 37.50 91.8%94.5%160,466 155,946 4,520 800$4,000$5.0 60 45.00 92.4%95.0%191,303 186,150 5,153 912$4,560$5.0 75 56.25 92.4%95.0%239,309 232,688 6,621 1,172$5,860$5.0 100 75 92.9%95.4%317,289 308,950 8,339 1,476$7,380$5.0 Perimeter Pump Systems Motor Upgrades Feasiblity Analysis Blended Electrical Cost $0.177 Maximum Acceptable Payback 5 Years Ratio of BHP to Motor HP 75% Estimated Annual Hours of Operation 3200 Exist Est Replace if Proposed Required Proposed Required Required Proposed Required Motor Brake Motor Eff New Existing Energy Energy Energy Motor Simple Hp Hp Is Less Motor Energy Consump Savings Savings Instalation Payback Than Eff Cons KWh KWH KWH $Costs Yrs 1 0.75 65.9%85.5%2,715 2,093 621 110$550$5.0 1.5 1.13 70.6%86.5%3,804 3,103 701 124$620$5.0 2 1.50 73.4%86.5%4,878 4,138 740 131$655$5.0 3 2.25 78.6%89.5%6,835 5,999 836 148$740$5.0 5 3.75 82.5%89.5%10,851 9,998 853 151$755$5.0 7.5 5.63 84.4%91.0%15,903 14,750 1,153 204$1,020$5.0 10 7.50 85.5%91.7%20,929 19,517 1,412 250$1,250$5.0 15 11.25 87.4%93.0%30,730 28,866 1,864 330$1,650$5.0 20 15.00 87.6%93.0%40,861 38,488 2,373 420$2,100$5.0 25 18.75 87.8%93.6%50,988 47,801 3,186 564$2,820$5.0 30 22.50 89.1%94.1%60,277 57,057 3,220 570$2,850$5.0 40 30.00 89.6%94.1%79,917 76,076 3,842 680$3,400$5.0 50 37.50 90.2%94.5%99,212 94,692 4,520 800$4,000$5.0 60 45.00 90.9%95.0%118,185 113,032 5,153 912$4,560$5.0 75 56.25 90.7%95.0%147,912 141,291 6,621 1,172$5,860$5.0 100 75 91.3%95.4%195,936 187,597 8,339 1,476$7,380$5.0 Heating Coil Pump Systems APPENDIX E – SYSTEM DIAGRAMS HEATING WATER SYSTEMHEATING WATER SYSTEM DIAGAMSM1.1 VAV SYSTEMSVAV SYSTEMSM1.2 TWO SPEED SYSTEMSTWO SPEED SYSTEMSM1.3 HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMHEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMM1.4 APPENDIX F – EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES AHFC ENERGY AUDITS - EXISTING EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES BOILER SCHEDULE - NORTH POLE HIGH SCHOOL MARK TYPE BOILER CAP CAP OIL EST BURNER MODEL INPUT OUPUT CAP EFF MODEL # MBH MBH GPH %# B-1 BUILDING HEATING CAST IRON P-1086 2,520 2,040 18.0 81.0% B-2 BUILDING HEATING CAST IRON P-1086 2,520 2,040 18.0 81.0% B-3 BUILDING HEATING CAST IRON P-1086 2,520 2,040 18.0 81.0% NOTES: FAN SCHEDULE - NORTH POLE HIGH SCHOOL MARK FAN AIR MIN TSP CAPACITY MOTOR MOTOR MANUF FLOW OSA IN CONTROL SIZE EFF CFM CFM H20 HP AHU-1 PACE 65,200 4-1/4 VSD 75 N/A AHU-2 PACE 13,500 3 -1/2 IN VANES 15 N/A AHU-3 PACE 17,400 1-3/4 2 SPD 10/2 N/A 2 MOTOR DRIVE AHU-4 GYM PACE 36,000 2-1/4 2 SPD 20/5 90.1% 2 MOTOR DRIVE AHU-5 LOCKER ROOM PACE 8,800 N/A 2-1/4 2 SPD 5/1 N/A 2 MOTOR DRIVE REF-1 AHU-1 RET/EXH PACE 56,000 N/A 5/8 VSD 15 N/A REF-2 AHU-2 RET/EXH PACE 11,700 N/A 5/8 CV 3 N/A REF-3 AHU-3 RET/EXH PACE 17,400 N/A 1/2 2 SPD 7.5/1 N/A 2 MOTOR DRIVE REF-4 AHU-4 RET/EXH PACE 36,000 N/A 1/2 2 SPD 3 N/A FCU-1 SCREEN ROOM PACE 1,500 1-1/4 CV 1-1/2 N/A FCU-2 WOOD SHOP PACE 3,600 1 CV 2 80.0% FCU-3 AUTO SHOP PACE 4,500 1-1/4 CV 2 80.0% FCU-4 METAL SHOP PACE 4,300 1 CV 1-1/2 N/A FCU-5 VOC SHOP PACE 4,300 1 CV 1-1/2 N/A FCU-7 KITCHEN MAKE UP PACE 4,000 1-1/4 CV 3 N/A FCU-8 TOILET EXHAUST PACE 4,800 1-3/4 CV 5 N/A FCU-9 LOCKER EXHAUST PACE 8,500 1-3/4 2 SPD 5/1 N/A 2 MOTOR DRIVE FCU-10 AUTO SHOP EXHAUST PACE 3,500 N/A 1-1/4 CV 2 N/A NOTES: GOULD GOULD E PLUS GOULD E PLUS GOULD E PLUS GOULD E PLUS GOULD REMARKS REMARKS MOTOR MANUFACTURER N/A N/A N/A GOULD E PLUS GOULD LINCOLN LINCOLN LINCOLN LINCOLN GOULD E PLUS BALDOR BALDOR SERVES SERVES AUDITORIUM MAIN BUILDING MUSIC/ART BURNER MANUF BOILER MANUF WEIL McCLAIN WEIL McCLAIN WEIL McCLAIN GORDON PIATT GORDON PIATT GORDON PIATT RS Consulting - Mechanical Engineering - 2400 NW 80th St #178 Seattle, WA 98117 AHFC ENERGY AUDITS - EXISTING EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES PUMP SCHEDULE -NORTH POLE HIGH SCHOOL MARK PUMP PUMP PUMP PUMP PUMP CAPACITY MOTOR MOTOR REMARKS MANUF TYP MODEL FLOW HEAD CONTROL SIZE EFF # GPM FT H20 HP CP1A B & G INLINE HD3 100 6 CV 1/2 CP1B BOILER CIRC B & G INLINE HD3 100 6 CV 1/2 CP1C BOILER CIRC B & G INLINE HD3 100 6 CV 1/2 CP2A HEATING WATER DIST B & G END SUCT 3E-10-BF 285 95 CV 15.0 91.7% CP2B HEATING WATER DIST B & G END SUCT 3E-10-BF 285 95 CV 15.0 91.7% CP3 COIL PUMP - AHU-1 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 60 12 CV 1/2 N/A CP4 COIL PUMP - AHU-2 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 12 10 CV 1/4 N/A CP5 COIL PUMP - AHU-3 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 38 12 CV 1/4 N/A CP6 COIL PUMP - AHU-4 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 45 12 CV 1/3 N/A CP7 COIL PUMP - AHU-5 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 30 30 CV 3/4 N/A CP8 LOCKER EXH HEAT REC B & G INLINE SERIES 80 50 58 CV 2.0 N/A CP9 COIL PUMP - FCU-2 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 10 12 CV 1/6 N/A CP10 COIL PUMP - FCU-3 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 40 35 CV 1.0 N/A CP11 SHOP HEAT RECOVERY B & G INLINE SERIES 60 30 50 CV 1.0 N/A CP12 COIL PUMP - FCU-4 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 10 12 CV 1/6 N/A CP13 COIL PUMP - FCU-5 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 10 12 CV 1/6 N/A CP15 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 40 38 CV 1.0 91.0% REDUNDANT CP16 B & G INLINE SERIES 60 40 45 CV 1.0 91.0% CP18 RADIANT SLAB B & G INLINE SERIES 60 18 52 CV 1.0 91.0% REDUNDANT CP22 LOCKER ROOM TERM UN B & G INLINE SERIES 60 24 38 CV 3/4 N/A CP23 MUSIC TERM UNITS B & G INLINE SERIES 60 25 32 CV 3/4 N/A CP24 CLASSRM TERM UNITS B & G INLINE SERIES 60 36 42 CV 1.0 N/A CP25 SHOP TERM UNITS B & G INLINE SERIES 60 44 36 CV 1.0 N/A NOTES: BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET SERVES BOILER CIRC COIL PUMP - FCU-7 TOILET EXH HT REC BELL AND GOSSET MOTOR MANUF N/A BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET N/A N/A GOULD E-PLUS GOULD E-PLUS BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET BELL AND GOSSET RS Consulting - Mechanical Engineering - 2400 NW 80th St #178 Seattle, WA 98117 APPENDIX G – TRACE 700 INPUT Bldg:North Pole High School Zone Zone Floor Roof Total Floor Ceiling Plenum Grs Wall Window #Occ Design Design Number Name Area Area Perimeter to Floor Height Ht Area Area of per Total Watts Total Loads System Airflow Cfm Sf Sf Lgth, Ft Ht Ft Ft Ft Sf Sf People 1000 sf Watts Per SF Watts Watt/Sf Cfm SF 101 Gymnasiums/Storage/Wght rm 13,068 13,068 251 28.8 28.8 0.0 7,229 0 500 38 14,375 1.1 1568 0.12 AHU-4 36,000 2.75 Building Input Form - Trace 700 Lights (Existing) Misc Loads 101 Gymnasiums/Storage/Wght rm 13,068 13,068 251 28.8 28.8 0.0 7,229 0 500 38 14,375 1.1 1568 0.12 AHU-4 36,000 2.75 102 PE/Coaches/Training/Dressing 2,280 2,280 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 5 2 2,508 1.1 570 0.25 AHU-5 2,180 0.96 103 Boys/Girls Locker rooms 3,164 3,164 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 20 6 3,480 1.1 791 0.25 AHU-5 5,520 1.74 104 Ski/Classrooms/PE Storage 1,290 1,290 44 13.6 9.0 4.6 598 36 25 19 1,419 1.1 968 0.75 AHU-5 1,100 0.85 105 Boiler rm/Storage/Recv/Wkrm 2,646 2,646 111 26.0 9.0 17.0 2,886 24 0 0 2,911 1.1 5292 2.00 V-4 1,635 0.62 106 Wood shop 2,634 2,634 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 40 15 2,897 1.1 1976 0.75 FCU-2 3,000 1.14 107 Elect Switchgear/Emer Generator 600 600 14 13.6 9.0 4.6 190 0 0 0 660 1.1 150 0.25 UH 0.00 108 Auto shop 3,157 3,157 42 13.6 0.0 13.6 571 0 40 13 3,473 1.1 2368 0.75 FCU-3 4,500 1.43 109 Metal shop 3,234 3,234 43 16.8 0.0 16.8 722 0 40 12 3,557 1.1 2426 0.75 FCU-4 4,300 1.33109Metal shop 3,234 3,234 43 16.8 0.0 16.8 722 0 40 12 3,557 1.1 2426 0.75 FCU-4 4,300 1.33 110 Drivers Ed/Agriculuture lab 3,552 3,552 149 16.8 0.0 16.8 2,503 0 40 11 3,907 1.1 2664 0.75 FCU-5 2,100 0.59 111 Agriculuture class/storage/off 1,323 1,323 13 13.6 9.0 4.6 177 0 35 26 1,455 1.1 992 0.75 FCU-5 1,380 1.04 112 Green house 1,158 1,158 118 16.8 0.0 16.8 1,982 0 10 9 1,274 1.1 290 0.25 VF-1,-2 10,840 9.36 113 Business/Typing 1,513 90 13.6 9.0 4.6 1,224 96 50 33 1,664 1.1 1135 0.75 AHU-1 2,600 1.72 114 Drivers Ed/Simulator 1,472 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 20 14 1,619 1.1 1104 0.75 AHU-1 1,620 1.10 115 Power/mech/elect lab/auto 1,501 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 12 8 1,651 1.1 1126 0.75 AHU-1 1,220 0.81 116 Corridor 6,842 0 13.6 10.0 3.6 0 0 0 0 7,526 1.1 1711 0.25 AHU-1 1,200 0.18 117 Voc Ed/Din/Living/Drafting class 2,444 14 13.6 9.0 4.6 190 36 80 33 2,688 1.1 1833 0.75 AHU-1 2,770 1.13117Voc Ed/Din/Living/Drafting class 2,444 14 13.6 9.0 4.6 190 36 80 33 2,688 1.1 1833 0.75 AHU-1 2,770 1.13 118 Home economics 2,652 105 13.6 9.0 4.6 1,428 132 80 30 2,917 1.1 1989 0.75 AHU-1 4,680 1.76 119 Biology 1,300 83 13.6 9.0 4.6 1,129 96 40 31 1,430 1.1 975 0.75 AHU-1 2,210 1.70 120 Biology/Earth Science/Chem stg 2,968 103 13.6 9.0 4.6 1,401 156 80 27 3,265 1.1 2226 0.75 AHU-1 3,500 1.18 121 Bio/Earth Sci/Earth Phys/Chem 4,336 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 120 28 4,770 1.1 3252 0.75 AHU-1 5,000 1.15 122 Biology/Animal and Plant 1,278 65 13.6 9.0 4.6 884 48 35 27 1,406 1.1 959 0.75 AHU-1 1,980 1.55 123 Conference Room 376 52 13.6 9.0 4.6 707 36 10 27 414 1.1 94 0.25 AHU-2 560 1.49 124 Recp/Off/Nurse/Exam 1,200 34 13.6 9.0 4.6 462 48 15 13 1,320 1.1 300 0.25 AHU-2 1,200 1.00 125 Corridor 4,020 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 0 0 4,422 1.1 1005 0.25 AHU-1 1,200 0.30 126 Recp/Sec/Princ/VP/Offices 1,680 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 15 9 1,848 1.1 1260 0.75 AHU-1 830 0.49 127 Kitchen/Food Strg/Dish wash 1,976 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 10 5 2,174 1.1 1482 0.75 AHU-1 1,050 0.53 128 Commons 8,819 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 250 28 9,701 1.1 6614 0.75 AHU-1 5,500 0.62 129 Faculty Lounge/Fac Prep 2,352 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 25 11 2,587 1.1 2940 1.25 AHU-1 2,425 1.03 130 Boys/Girls dressing rooms 1,131 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 12 11 1,244 1.1 848 0.75 AHU-2 1,170 1.03 130A Screen Room 823 0 14.6 10.0 4.6 560 0 15 18 905 1.1 617 0.75 FCU-1 1,000 1.22 131 Band 1,056 1,056 25 22.4 20.6 1.8 560 0 30 28 1,162 1.1 792 0.75 AHU-2 2,165 2.05 132 Choral/Band offices/storage 1,860 31 13.6 9.0 4.6 422 0 30 16 2,046 1.1 1395 0.75 AHU-2 1,070 0.58 133 Choir 1,288 1,288 84 22.6 18.0 4.6 1,898 0 30 23 1,417 1.1 966 0.75 AHU-2 2,285 1.77133Choir1,288 1,288 84 22.6 18.0 4.6 1,898 0 30 23 1,417 1.1 966 0.75 AHU-2 2,285 1.77 134 Stage 1,647 2,470 126 55.1 47.2 7.9 6,943 0 12 7 1,812 1.1 3295 2.00 AHU-3 4,000 2.43 135 Auditorium 4,544 3,950 54 55.1 47.2 7.9 2,975 0 350 77 4,998 1.1 3408 0.75 AHU-3 13,380 2.94 136 Vestibule 504 36 9.4 8.0 1.4 338 0 0 0 554 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 1,100 2.18 137 Vestibule 184 8 9.4 8.0 1.4 75 0 0 0 202 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 2.99 138 Vestibule 64 8 9.4 8.0 1.4 75 0 0 0 70 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 8.59 139 Vestibule 80 8 9.4 8.0 1.4 75 0 0 0 88 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 6.88 140 Vestibule 80 10 9.4 8.0 1.4 94 0 0 0 88 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 6.88 141 Vestibule 162 14 9.4 8.0 1.4 132 0 0 0 178 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 3.40141Vestibule162149.4 8.0 1.4 132 0 0 0 178 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 3.40 142 Vestibule 64 8 9.4 8.0 1.4 75 0 0 0 70 1.1 0 0.00 VCH 550 8.59 143 Drama Classroom 900 0 13.6 9.0 4.6 0 0 30 33 990 1.1 0 0.00 AHU-2 690 0.77 201 Mechanical rms/MW restrms 5,420 5,420 67 14.0 8.6 5.4 938 0 0 0 5,962 1.1 4065 0.75 VCH 0.00 202 Math 3,618 3,618 164 14.0 8.6 5.4 2,296 216 120 33 3,980 1.1 2714 0.75 AHU-1 5,500 1.52 203 Social Studies 3,618 3,618 106 14.0 8.6 5.4 1,484 96 120 33 3,980 1.1 2714 0.75 AHU-1 5,250 1.45 204 Math/Computer/Prep 2,070 2,070 0 14.0 8.6 5.4 0 0 68 33 2,277 1.1 1553 0.75 AHU-1 2,060 1.00 205 Learn dis/off/testing/computer 4,318 4,318 0 14.0 8.6 5.4 0 0 20 5 4,750 1.1 3239 0.75 AHU-1 2,000 0.46 Bldg:North Pole High School Zone Zone Floor Roof Total Floor Ceiling Plenum Grs Wall Window #Occ Design Design Number Name Area Area Perimeter to Floor Height Ht Area Area of per Total Watts Total Loads System Airflow Cfm Sf Sf Lgth, Ft Ht Ft Ft Ft Sf Sf People 1000 sf Watts Per SF Watts Watt/Sf Cfm SF Building Input Form - Trace 700 Lights (Existing) Misc Loads 206 Corridor 4,603 4,603 70 14.0 8.6 5.4 980 0 0 0 5,063 1.1 3452 0.75 AHU-1 1,200 0.26206Corridor4,603 4,603 70 14.0 8.6 5.4 980 0 0 0 5,063 1.1 3452 0.75 AHU-1 1,200 0.26 207 Social Studies/Language 3,561 3,561 132 14.0 8.6 5.4 1,848 192 120 34 3,917 1.1 2671 0.75 AHU-1 5,280 1.48 208 Language/Fine Art 2,417 2,417 120 14.0 8.6 5.4 1,680 108 80 33 2,659 1.1 1813 0.75 AHU-1 3,930 1.63 209 Language 3,195 3,195 0 14.0 8.6 5.4 0 0 80 25 3,515 1.1 2396 0.75 AHU-1 2,565 0.80 210 Library 5,288 5,288 80 14.0 8.6 5.4 1,120 0 130 25 5,817 1.1 3966 0.75 AHU-1 4,210 0.80 211 Conference room 624 624 18 14.0 8.6 5.4 252 0 10 16 686 1.1 468 0.75 AHU-1 260 0.42 212 Corridor 4,721 4,721 20 14.0 8.6 5.4 280 0 0 0 5,193 1.1 3541 0.75 AHU-1 735 0.16 213 Crafts 1,537 1,537 55 14.0 8.6 5.4 770 24 30 20 1,691 1.1 1153 0.75 AHU-2 1,370 0.89 214 Mech rooms 1,553 1,553 133 14.0 14.0 1,862 0 0 0 1,708 1.1 1165 0.75 AHU-2 0.00214Mech rooms 1,553 1,553 133 14.0 14.0 1,862 0 0 0 1,708 1.1 1165 0.75 AHU-2 0.00 215 Media graphics/Photo lab 3,170 3,170 104 14.0 9.0 5.0 1,456 0 15 5 3,487 1.1 2378 0.75 AHU-2 1,820 0.57 216 Control room 594 594 75 14.0 8.6 5.4 1,050 0 4 7 653 1.1 149 0.25 AHU-2 1,000 1.68 149,529 97,177 2,887 54,524 1,344 2,903 164,482 1.1 98,811 0.66 179,440 Percent Windows 2%33%Diversity AIR HANDLING UNITS Total Student Enrollment 946 TAG SERVES AREA CFM CFM/SF SCHEDULEDTAGSERVESAREACFMCFM/SF SCHEDULED AHU-1 CLASSROOMS 83,186 70,775 0.85 65200 AHU-2 MUSIC 14,665 13,330 0.91 13500 AHU-3 AUDITORIUM 6,191 17,380 2.81 17400 AHU-4 GYM 13,068 36,000 2.75 36000 AHU-5 LOCKERS 6,734 8,800 1.31 8800 FCU-1 SCREEN ROOM 823 1,000 1.22 FCU-2 WOOD SHOP 2,634 3,000 1.14 FCU-3 AUTO SHOP 3,157 4,500 1.43 FCU-4 METAL SHOP 3,234 4,300 1.33 FCU-5 SHOP 4,875 3,480 0.71 CH-1 VESTIBULES 1,138 4,400 3.87 OTHER OTHER 10,227 10,227 149,932 177,192 1.18 Bldg:North Pole High School Wall Direction: North = 0, East = 90, South = 180, West =270 Zone Zone Number Name Wall Gross Wall Wall Glass Glass Wall Wall Gross Wall Wall Glass Glass Wall Wall Gross Wall Wall Glass Glass Wall Length Ft Sq Ft Type Area Type Direction Length Ft Sq Ft Type Area Type Direction Length Ft Sq Ft Type Area Type Direction 101 Gymnasiums/Storage/Wght rm 133 3830 2 0 100 2880 2 270 18 518 2 90 102 PE/Coaches/Training/Dressing 0 0 0 103 Boys/Girls Locker rooms 0 0 0 104 Ski/Classrooms/PE Storage 3 41 1 0 41 558 1 36 1 270 0 105 Boiler rm/Storage/Recv/Wkrm 44 1144 1 270 64 1664 1 24 1 180 3 78 1 90 106 Wood shop 0 0 0 107 Elect Switchgear/Emer Generator 14 190 1 270 0 0 108 Auto shop 42 571 1 270 0 0 109 Metal shop 43 722 1 270 0 0 110 Drivers Ed/Agriculuture lab 58 974 1 270 25 420 1 0 66 1109 1 180 111 Agriculuture class/storage/off 13 177 1 90 0 0 112 Green house 14 235 1 270 52 874 1 180 52 874 1 90 113 Business/Typing 37 503 1 48 1 180 53 721 1 48 1 90 0 114 Drivers Ed/Simulator 0 0 0 115 Power/mech/elect lab/auto 0 0 0 116 Corridor 0 0 0 117 Voc Ed/Din/Living/Drafting class 14 190 1 36 1 180 0 0 118 Home economics 52 707 1 84 1 180 53 721 1 48 1 90 0 119 Biology 26 354 1 48 1 180 53 721 1 48 1 90 4 54 1 270 120 Biology/Earth Science/Chem stg 74 1006 1 144 1 180 29 394 1 12 1 90 0 121 Bio/Earth Sci/Earth Phys/Chem 0 0 0 122 Biology/Animal and Plant 55 748 1 48 1 90 10 136 1 0 0 123 Conference Room 10 136 1 180 25 340 1 12 1 90 17 231 1 24 1 0 124 Recp/Off/Nurse/Exam 34 462 1 48 1 0 0 0 125 Corridor 0 0 0 126 Recp/Sec/Princ/VP/Offices 0 0 0 127 Kitchen/Food Strg/Dish wash 0 0 0 128 Commons 0 0 0 129 Faculty Lounge/Fac Prep 0 0 0 130 Boys/Girls dressing rooms 0 0 0 130A Screen Room 131 Band 25 560 1 90 0 0 132 Choral/Band offices/storage 31 422 1 90 0 0 133 Choir 24 542 1 90 57 1288 1 0 3 68 1 270 134 Stage 3 165 1 90 96 5290 1 1 27 1488 1 270 135 Auditorium 54 0 1 270 0 0 136 Vestibule 36 338 1 0 0 0 137 Vestibule 8 75 1 270 0 0 138 Vestibule 8 75 1 180 0 0 139 Vestibule 8 75 1 180 0 0 140 Vestibule 10 94 1 180 0 0 141 Vestibule 14 132 1 90 0 0 142 Vestibule 8 75 1 0 0 0 143 Drama Classroom 0 0 0 201 Mechanical rms/MW restrms 21 294 1 0 46 644 1 90 0 202 Math 82 1148 1 144 1 180 82 1148 1 72 1 90 0 203 Social Studies 52 728 1 12 1 90 54 756 1 84 1 180 0 204 Math/Computer/Prep 0 0 0 205 Learn dis/off/testing/computer 0 0 0 206 Corridor 14 196 1 270 38 532 1 180 18 252 1 0 207 Social Studies/Language 53 742 1 48 1 90 79 1106 1 144 1 180 0 208 Language/Fine Art 94 1316 1 60 1 90 26 364 1 48 1 0 0 209 Language 0 0 0 210 Library 26 364 1 270 27 378 1 270 27 378 1 180 211 Conference room 18 252 1 0 0 0 212 Corridor 20 280 1 0 0 0 213 Crafts 55 770 1 24 1 0 0 0 214 Mech rooms 56 784 1 0 30 420 1 90 47 658 1 180 215 Media graphics/Photo lab 64 896 1 270 40 560 1 0 0 216 Control room 9 126 1 270 66 924 1 0 0 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Building Input Form - Trace 700 - Wall Data Library Members Schedules FB School Misc Loads Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 11 a.m. 100.0 11 a.m. noon 80.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 30.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 11 a.m. 100.0 11 a.m. noon 80.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 30.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 5.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 5.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 5.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 7 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 11 a.m. 100.0 11 a.m. noon 80.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 30.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 8 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules Lights - Middle School gym Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 7 p.m. 100.0 7 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 3 p.m. 10.0 3 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 7 p.m. 100.0 7 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 fb school vest tstat Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time Setpoint °FJanuary - December Cooling design to Sunday Thermostat Midnight Midnight 70.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 9 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB School Vent Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - June Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 5 p.m. 100.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJuly - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 10 a.m. 0.0 10 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 5 p.m. 100.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 10 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB School Lights Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 20.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 50.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 20.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 11 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules Midnight Midnight 0.0 fb school clg tstat Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time Setpoint °FJanuary - May Cooling design to Weekday Thermostat Midnight 9 a.m. 95.0 9 a.m. 4 p.m. 80.0 4 p.m. Midnight 95.0 Start time End time Setpoint °FSeptember - December Cooling design to Weekday Thermostat Midnight 9 a.m. 95.0 9 a.m. 4 p.m. 80.0 4 p.m. Midnight 95.0 Start time End time Setpoint °FJune - August Cooling design to Weekday Thermostat Midnight 7 a.m. 95.0 7 a.m. 6 p.m. 95.0 6 p.m. Midnight 95.0 Start time End time Setpoint °FJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Thermostat Midnight 9 a.m. 95.0 8 a.m. 5 p.m. 75.0 4 p.m. Midnight 95.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 12 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules People - Middle School gym Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. 7 p.m. 20.0 7 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 3 p.m. 10.0 3 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. 7 p.m. 20.0 7 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 13 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules Vent - Middle School kitchen Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 6 a.m. 0.0 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 10.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 80.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. 6 p.m. 10.0 6 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 6 a.m. 0.0 6 a.m. 8 a.m. 10.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 50.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 10.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 6 a.m. 0.0 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 10.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 80.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 50.0 5 p.m. 6 p.m. 10.0 6 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight 6 a.m. 0.0 6 a.m. 5 p.m. 30.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 14 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 15 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules fb school htg tstat Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time Setpoint °FJanuary - May Cooling design to Weekday Thermostat Midnight 5 a.m. 65.0 5 a.m. 6 a.m. 66.0 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 67.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 68.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 69.0 9 a.m. 5 p.m. 70.0 5 p.m. Midnight 65.0 Start time End time Setpoint °FSeptember - December Cooling design to Weekday Thermostat Midnight 5 a.m. 65.0 5 a.m. 6 a.m. 66.0 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 67.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 68.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 69.0 9 a.m. 5 p.m. 70.0 5 p.m. Midnight 65.0 Start time End time Setpoint °FJune - August Cooling design to Weekday Thermostat Midnight 7 a.m. 65.0 7 a.m. 6 p.m. 65.0 6 p.m. Midnight 65.0 Start time End time Setpoint °FJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Thermostat Midnight 7 a.m. 65.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 65.0 8 a.m. 5 p.m. 65.0 5 p.m. 6 p.m. 65.0 6 p.m. Midnight 65.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 16 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB School Parking Lot Lights Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - March Cooling design to Sunday Utilization Midnight 9 a.m. 100.0 9 a.m. 4 p.m. 0.0 4 p.m. Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 100.0 7 a.m. 6 p.m. 0.0 6 p.m. Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageApril - September Cooling design to Sunday Utilization Midnight 5 a.m. 100.0 5 a.m. 8 p.m. 0.0 8 p.m. Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageOctober - December Cooling design to Sunday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 100.0 8 a.m. 6 p.m. 0.0 6 p.m. Midnight 100.0 FB School Vestibule Infiltration Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design to Sunday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 75.0 8 a.m. 5 p.m. 100.0 5 p.m. Midnight 75.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 17 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules Cooling Only (Design)Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Available (100%)Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 18 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB People Common Areas Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 10 a.m. 100.0 10 a.m. noon 25.0 noon 1 p.m. 100.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 25.0 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 100.0 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 25.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 10 a.m. 0.0 10 a.m. 3 p.m. 25.0 3 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 10 a.m. 100.0 10 a.m. noon 25.0 noon 1 p.m. 100.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 25.0 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 100.0 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 25.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 19 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules Midnight Midnight 0.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 20 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB People Classroom Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 20.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. noon 100.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 50.0 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 20.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 10 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 30.0 2 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 0.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 20.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. noon 100.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 50.0 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 20.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 21 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 22 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB Dom Hot Water Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 5.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 11 a.m. 100.0 11 a.m. noon 80.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 30.0 5 p.m. Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Saturday Utilization Midnight Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 5.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 10.0 8 a.m. 3 p.m. 30.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 10.0 5 p.m. Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Saturday Utilization Midnight Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 7 a.m. 5.0 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 50.0 8 a.m. 11 a.m. 100.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 23 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules 11 a.m. noon 80.0 noon 1 p.m. 20.0 1 p.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 5 p.m. 30.0 5 p.m. Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Saturday Utilization Midnight Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 5.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Off (0%)Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time StatusJanuary - December Cooling design to Sunday Equipment operation Midnight Midnight Off TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 24 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB People Office Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Cooling design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 50.0 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 20.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Weekday Utilization Midnight 10 a.m. 0.0 10 a.m. 2 p.m. 30.0 2 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 0.0 8 a.m. 9 a.m. 50.0 9 a.m. 3 p.m. 100.0 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 50.0 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 20.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 0.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 25 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB School Infiltration Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 100.0 8 a.m. 4 p.m. 25.0 4 p.m. Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Saturday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Saturday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 8 a.m. 100.0 8 a.m. 4 p.m. 25.0 4 p.m. Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Saturday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Sunday Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 26 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Schedules FB Fan Middle School Simulation type: Reduced year Start time End time PercentageJanuary - May Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 6 a.m. 0.0 6 a.m. 5 p.m. 100.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageHeating Design Utilization Midnight Midnight 100.0 Start time End time PercentageJanuary - December Saturday to Sunday Utilization Midnight 11 a.m. 0.0 11 a.m. 2 p.m. 0.0 2 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageJune - August Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 10 a.m. 0.0 10 a.m. 2 p.m. 100.0 2 p.m. Midnight 0.0 Start time End time PercentageSeptember - December Cooling design to Weekday Utilization Midnight 6 a.m. 0.0 6 a.m. 5 p.m. 100.0 5 p.m. Midnight 0.0 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 27 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc Library Members Utility Rates Fairbanks Oil and Elect Rates Min Charge Start period End periodMin demand Fuel adjustment kWh/kW flag On peak Electric demand Rate Cutoff No 0 0.00 0 January December 0Customer charge 10.790$ Min Charge Start period End periodMin demand Fuel adjustment kWh/kW flag On peak Oil Rate Cutoff No 0 0 0 January December 0Customer charge 2.430$ Min Charge Start period End periodMin demand Fuel adjustment kWh/kW flag On peak Electric consumption Rate Cutoff No 0 30.00 0 January December 0Customer charge 0.160$ Base Utilities Domestic Hot Water Load Domestic Hot Water Available (100%) 100.00 Mbh Process hot water load Comments Schedule Energy Type Hourly demand Entering Leaving °F °F 70.00 120.00 Parking lot lights Parking lot lights 0.10 kW Electricity Comments Schedule Energy Type Hourly demand Entering Leaving °F °F TRACE® 700 v6.2.7Project Name:North Pole High School Page 28 of 31Dataset Name:NP High School.trc APPENDIX H – TRACE 700 OUPUT Total Building Consumption ElectricityStand-alone Base Utilities ElectricityReceptacles - Conditioned ElectricityFans - Conditioned ElectricityPumps Oil Space Heating Electricity ElectricityLighting - Conditioned Alt-3 Variable Speed PumpingAlt-2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2* Alt-1 Existing Systems Energy 10^6 Btu/yr Proposed / Base % Peak kBtuh Energy 10^6 Btu/yr Proposed / Base % Peak kBtuh Energy 10^6 Btu/yr Proposed / Base % Peak kBtuh 1,090.9 10 593 1,090.9 100 593 1,090.9 100 593 649.7 6 111 649.7 100 111 672.6 104 111 5,998.4 54 7,319 5,998.4 100 7,319 5,998.4 100 7,195 621.6 6 91 621.6 100 91 194.8 31 64 1,402.7 13 584 1,356.0 97 577 1,356.0 97 577 350.1 3 256 350.1 100 256 350.1 100 256 914.3 8 205 914.3 100 205 914.3 100 205 11,027.7 10,981.0 10,577.1 Energy Cost Budget / PRM Summary By RS Consulting Project Name: North Pole High School Weather Data: Eielson AFB, AlaskaCity: North Pole AK February 17, 2012Date: Note: The percentage displayed for the "Proposed/ Base %" column of the base case is actually the percentage of the total energy consumption. * Denotes the base alternative for the ECB study. Total Oil Electricity Alt-3 Variable Speed PumpingAlt-2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2* Alt-1 Existing Systems Energy 10^6 Btu/yr Cost/yr $/yr Energy 10^6 Btu/yr Cost/yr $/yr Energy 10^6 Btu/yr Cost/yr $/yr 5,029.3 294,943 4,982.6 292,478 4,578.7 271,876 5,998.4 145,760 5,998.4 145,760 5,998.4 145,760 11,028 440,703 10,981 438,238 10,577 417,636 Total Alt-3 Variable Speed PumpingAlt-2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2* Alt-1 Existing Systems Number of hours heating load not met Number of hours cooling load not met 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Pole High School Dataset Name: Project Name: Energy Cost Budget Report Page 1 of 1 TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012 NP High School.trc MONTHLY ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalUtility ------- Monthly Energy Consumption ------- Alternative: 1 Existing Systems Electric 1,473,572146,093141,341142,355116,66179,35275,77477,028126,455120,415152,943137,759157,394On-Pk Cons. (kWh) 476452453453453448448447453455476475470On-Pk Demand (kW) Oil 59,9848,5397,0945,5202,4251,1481,1141,0982,6723,7047,4438,46010,766Cons. (therms) Building Source Floor Area 70,589 137,005 ft2 Btu/(ft2-year) 156,224 CO2 SO2 NOX Energy Consumption Environmental Impact Analysis 76,537,672 lbm/year 78,944 gm/year 249,439 gm/year Btu/(ft2-year) Alternative: 2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2 Electric 1,459,902144,922140,168141,237115,57778,31574,76475,961125,199119,388151,744136,592156,035On-Pk Cons. (kWh) 473450451451451446446445451452473473468On-Pk Demand (kW) Oil 59,9848,5397,0945,5202,4251,1481,1141,0982,6723,7047,4438,46010,766Cons. (therms) Building Source Floor Area 70,290 136,109 ft2 Btu/(ft2-year) 156,224 CO2 SO2 NOX Energy Consumption Environmental Impact Analysis 75,827,632 lbm/year 78,212 gm/year 247,125 gm/year Btu/(ft2-year) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 2 Monthly Energy Consumption report Page 1 of 2 MONTHLY ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalUtility ------- Monthly Energy Consumption ------- Alternative: 3 Variable Speed Pumping Electric 1,341,553134,869130,303130,905105,87368,54564,97766,504115,119109,261141,320127,612146,264On-Pk Cons. (kWh) 462437437437438433433433438439460462457On-Pk Demand (kW) Oil 59,9848,5397,0945,5202,4251,1481,1141,0982,6723,7047,4438,46010,766Cons. (therms) Building Source Floor Area 67,705 128,352 ft2 Btu/(ft2-year) 156,224 CO2 SO2 NOX Energy Consumption Environmental Impact Analysis 69,680,592 lbm/year 71,872 gm/year 227,092 gm/year Btu/(ft2-year) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 3 Monthly Energy Consumption report Page 2 of 2 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 1 Existing Systems Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Lights 28,352.8 34,000.8 29,903.4 32,672.0 13,250.8 12,459.4 13,812.8 29,903.4 32,672.0 31,232.2 319,617.031,343.2 30,014.3Electric (kWh) 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7Peak (kW) Misc. Ld 10,119.5 12,250.0 10,652.1 11,717.3 825.2 750.2 862.7 10,652.1 11,717.3 11,184.7 102,568.011,184.7 10,652.1Electric (kWh) 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0Peak (kW) Energy Recovery Parasitics 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 3.50.3 0.3Electric (kWh) Cooling Coil Condensate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.60.0 0.0Recoverable Water (1000gal) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Peak (1000gal/Hr) Bsu 1: Parking lot lights 28,560.0 31,620.0 16,200.0 16,740.0 16,200.0 16,740.0 16,740.0 16,200.0 26,040.0 25,200.0 267,900.031,620.0 26,040.0Electric (kWh) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Peak (kW) Bsu 2: Domestic Hot Water Load 1,431.0 1,701.0 1,512.0 1,641.6 700.2 676.8 728.1 1,512.0 1,641.6 1,571.4 16,220.71,582.2 1,522.8Proc. Hot Water (therms) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Peak (therms/Hr) Cpl 1: No Cooling [Sum of dsn coil capacities=307.5 tons] Hpl 1: Main Building Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=6,760 mbh] Boiler - 001 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=6,760 mbh / 80.48 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 7,228.2 6,393.5 3,240.8 2,463.0 1,097.8 1,113.9 1,147.5 2,264.7 4,861.0 6,053.5 52,218.59,126.8 7,227.8Oil (therms) 55.6 50.1 42.0 22.1 15.4 4.6 4.6 4.6 16.4 30.3 37.2 43.9 55.6Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 1,567.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 1,735.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 20,431.31,735.3 1,735.3Electric (kWh) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 4,543.0 5,029.7 4,867.5 5,029.7 4,867.5 5,029.8 5,029.7 4,867.5 5,029.8 4,867.5 59,221.25,029.7 5,029.7Electric (kWh) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8Peak (kW) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 1 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 1 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 1 Existing Systems Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Hpl 1: Main Building Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=6,760 mbh] Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 336.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 360.0 4,380.0372.0 372.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 5,101.8 5,648.4 5,466.2 5,648.4 5,466.2 5,648.4 5,648.4 5,466.2 5,648.4 5,466.2 66,505.35,648.4 5,648.4Electric (kWh) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 9,926.4 10,990.0 10,635.5 10,990.0 10,635.5 10,990.0 10,990.0 10,635.5 10,990.0 10,635.5 129,398.210,990.0 10,990.0Electric (kWh) 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8Peak (kW) Hpl 2: Perimeter Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=1,991 mbh] Boiler - 002 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=1,991 mbh / 23.71 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 329.0 405.5 261.4 123.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 103.6 283.0 391.8 2,688.7391.2 399.7Oil (therms) 9.2 7.6 5.6 3.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 3.5 5.5 6.9 9.2Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 251.5 368.2 271.4 174.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 144.3 269.3 281.7 2,336.5284.4 291.3Electric (kWh) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 728.8 1,067.4 786.6 505.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 418.2 780.6 816.5 6,772.6824.4 844.3Electric (kWh) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Peak (kW) Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 183.0 268.0 197.5 127.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 105.0 196.0 205.0 1,700.5207.0 212.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 818.5 1,198.7 883.3 568.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 469.6 876.6 916.9 7,605.6925.8 948.2Electric (kWh) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 502.9 736.5 542.7 349.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 288.6 538.6 563.4 4,673.1568.9 582.6Electric (kWh) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4Peak (kW) Hpl 3: Glycol System [Sum of dsn coil capacities=5,820 mbh] Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 1 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 2 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 1 Existing Systems Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Hpl 3: Glycol System [Sum of dsn coil capacities=5,820 mbh] Boiler - 003 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=5,820 mbh / 69.29 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 902.8 643.6 202.2 85.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 376.3 649.1 5,076.31,248.4 911.9Oil (therms) 8.4 7.1 5.6 2.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.5 4.6 5.9 8.4Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 937.8 785.1 425.7 273.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.7 799.2 887.6 6,899.61,325.3 1,293.2Electric (kWh) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 2,718.1 2,275.8 1,233.9 791.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.6 2,316.5 2,572.6 19,998.83,841.5 3,748.3Electric (kWh) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8Peak (kW) Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 233.5 195.5 106.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 199.0 221.0 1,718.0330.0 322.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 3,052.4 2,555.7 1,385.7 888.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 562.1 2,601.4 2,889.0 22,458.74,313.9 4,209.4Electric (kWh) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 2,500.7 2,093.7 1,135.2 728.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.5 2,131.2 2,366.8 18,398.93,534.1 3,448.5Electric (kWh) 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4Peak (kW) Sys 1: AHU-1 Main Building VAV AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=34,485 cfm / 35.83 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 5,972.7 6,882.4 5,834.2 6,420.3 4,678.0 4,151.3 4,972.1 5,824.9 6,574.4 6,399.4 70,587.06,603.1 6,274.2Electric (kWh) 31.0 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=2,800 cfm / 1.32 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 231.5 285.5 264.7 298.5 116.3 105.7 121.6 270.7 280.7 261.8 2,728.8246.9 244.9Electric (kWh) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3Peak (kW) AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=38,140 cfm / 23.31 kW] (Main Return Fan) 2,286.8 2,651.2 2,242.0 2,615.2 2,313.3 1,988.4 2,263.4 2,316.7 2,510.7 2,457.1 28,582.82,530.2 2,407.7Electric (kWh) 16.1 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.2 19.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.2Peak (kW) Sys 2: AHU-4 Gym System Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 1 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 3 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 1 Existing Systems Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Sys 2: AHU-4 Gym System FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=36,000 cfm / 25.68 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 7,883.8 7,601.3 5,855.0 6,265.9 2,638.0 2,355.0 2,732.7 5,598.2 6,548.4 7,858.1 72,798.89,167.8 8,294.6Electric (kWh) 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=38,100 cfm / 13.59 kW] (Main Return Fan) 3,952.4 3,848.2 2,996.8 3,330.2 1,588.2 1,397.7 1,529.5 2,939.5 3,312.9 3,972.6 37,624.04,587.4 4,168.7Electric (kWh) 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6Peak (kW) Sys 3: AHU-6 Shops FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=26,420 cfm / 23.56 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 4,956.7 5,376.2 4,619.5 5,153.1 2,590.3 2,313.7 2,677.4 4,687.2 5,503.0 5,425.8 55,280.66,480.4 5,497.2Electric (kWh) 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=11,800 cfm / 5.57 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 139.6 177.0 160.7 264.4 264.7 217.6 227.4 230.7 167.7 161.6 2,313.3152.5 149.3Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.1 4.9 4.7 4.7 2.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.9Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=26,420 cfm / 16.49 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 136.2 193.7 216.5 352.0 394.0 303.6 373.8 308.6 176.0 158.5 2,907.5148.5 145.9Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.9 5.8 6.4 6.7 3.4 1.6 1.0 1.0 6.7Peak (kW) Sys 4: CH Vestibules FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=5,100 cfm / 0.48 kW] (Main Htg Fan) 10.5 16.3 10.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 10.7 14.1 98.111.4 12.9Electric (kWh) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3Peak (kW) Sys 5: AHU-2 Music AF Centrifugal vav/inlet v [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=6,827 cfm / 7.34 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 1,808.2 1,985.3 1,665.9 1,797.1 951.1 893.2 1,007.6 1,625.2 1,891.1 1,869.5 19,414.52,055.2 1,865.0Electric (kWh) 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3Peak (kW) AF Centrifugal vav/inlet v [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=7,418 cfm / 5.85 kW] (Main Return Fan) 1,305.9 1,475.3 1,285.3 1,567.9 1,095.4 982.2 978.9 1,362.8 1,399.6 1,392.7 15,689.01,482.5 1,360.6Electric (kWh) 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8Peak (kW) Sys 6: AHU-3 Auditorium Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 1 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 4 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 1 Existing Systems Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Sys 6: AHU-3 Auditorium FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=9,190 cfm / 6.56 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 3,947.2 4,242.6 4,080.6 4,158.0 3,803.2 4,113.3 3,909.6 4,040.6 4,279.1 4,233.2 49,588.74,390.6 4,390.6Electric (kWh) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=9,503 cfm / 3.39 kW] (Main Return Fan) 1,975.2 2,128.4 2,050.6 2,108.5 1,941.8 2,089.6 1,979.2 2,041.3 2,145.3 2,123.1 24,977.22,195.8 2,198.5Electric (kWh) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4Peak (kW) Sys 7: AHU-7 - Kitchen FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=4,000 cfm / 3.57 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 501.5 590.6 516.5 573.5 326.4 263.9 329.6 520.0 580.7 554.3 5,824.1539.3 527.9Electric (kWh) 2.9 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=5,000 cfm / 3.30 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 509.1 620.6 551.3 622.6 243.7 172.9 245.0 562.7 596.6 566.1 5,782.8555.2 537.1Electric (kWh) 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=4,000 cfm / 2.85 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.60.0 0.0Electric (kWh) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9Peak (kW) Sys 8: AHU-5 Locker Rooms FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=8,800 cfm / 6.28 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 1,663.7 1,619.6 1,277.4 1,422.9 681.7 605.0 701.0 1,294.2 1,408.5 1,494.0 15,876.82,120.7 1,588.1Electric (kWh) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=6,000 cfm / 2.83 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 23.8 32.0 30.3 71.8 66.7 54.5 53.5 62.1 30.0 29.2 505.425.6 26.0Electric (kWh) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 2.3 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=8,800 cfm / 2.35 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 20.0 26.3 24.4 47.9 51.1 41.6 41.6 41.6 26.4 24.0 388.321.7 21.7Electric (kWh) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7Peak (kW) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 1 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 5 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Lights 28,352.8 34,000.8 29,903.4 32,672.0 13,250.8 12,459.4 13,812.8 29,903.4 32,672.0 31,232.2 319,617.031,343.2 30,014.3Electric (kWh) 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7Peak (kW) Misc. Ld 10,119.5 12,250.0 10,652.1 11,717.3 825.2 750.2 862.7 10,652.1 11,717.3 11,184.7 102,568.011,184.7 10,652.1Electric (kWh) 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0Peak (kW) Energy Recovery Parasitics 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 3.50.3 0.3Electric (kWh) Cooling Coil Condensate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.60.0 0.0Recoverable Water (1000gal) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Peak (1000gal/Hr) Bsu 1: Parking lot lights 28,560.0 31,620.0 16,200.0 16,740.0 16,200.0 16,740.0 16,740.0 16,200.0 26,040.0 25,200.0 267,900.031,620.0 26,040.0Electric (kWh) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Peak (kW) Bsu 2: Domestic Hot Water Load 1,431.0 1,701.0 1,512.0 1,641.6 700.2 676.8 728.1 1,512.0 1,641.6 1,571.4 16,220.71,582.2 1,522.8Proc. Hot Water (therms) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Peak (therms/Hr) Cpl 1: No Cooling [Sum of dsn coil capacities=307.5 tons] Hpl 1: Main Building Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=6,760 mbh] Boiler - 001 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=6,760 mbh / 80.48 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 7,228.2 6,393.5 3,240.8 2,463.0 1,097.8 1,113.9 1,147.5 2,264.7 4,861.0 6,053.5 52,218.59,126.8 7,227.8Oil (therms) 55.6 50.1 42.0 22.1 15.4 4.6 4.6 4.6 16.4 30.3 37.2 43.9 55.6Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 1,567.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 1,735.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 1,735.3 1,679.3 20,431.31,735.3 1,735.3Electric (kWh) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 4,543.0 5,029.7 4,867.5 5,029.7 4,867.5 5,029.8 5,029.7 4,867.5 5,029.8 4,867.5 59,221.25,029.7 5,029.7Electric (kWh) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8Peak (kW) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 2 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 6 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Hpl 1: Main Building Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=6,760 mbh] Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 336.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 360.0 4,380.0372.0 372.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 5,101.8 5,648.4 5,466.2 5,648.4 5,466.2 5,648.4 5,648.4 5,466.2 5,648.4 5,466.2 66,505.35,648.4 5,648.4Electric (kWh) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 9,926.4 10,990.0 10,635.5 10,990.0 10,635.5 10,990.0 10,990.0 10,635.5 10,990.0 10,635.5 129,398.210,990.0 10,990.0Electric (kWh) 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8Peak (kW) Hpl 2: Perimeter Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=1,991 mbh] Boiler - 002 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=1,991 mbh / 23.71 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 329.0 405.5 261.4 123.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 103.6 283.0 391.8 2,688.7391.2 399.7Oil (therms) 9.2 7.6 5.6 3.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 3.5 5.5 6.9 9.2Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 251.5 368.2 271.4 174.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 144.3 269.3 281.7 2,336.5284.4 291.3Electric (kWh) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 728.8 1,067.4 786.6 505.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 418.2 780.6 816.5 6,772.6824.4 844.3Electric (kWh) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Peak (kW) Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 183.0 268.0 197.5 127.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 105.0 196.0 205.0 1,700.5207.0 212.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 818.5 1,198.7 883.3 568.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 469.6 876.6 916.9 7,605.6925.8 948.2Electric (kWh) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 502.9 736.5 542.7 349.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 288.6 538.6 563.4 4,673.1568.9 582.6Electric (kWh) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4Peak (kW) Hpl 3: Glycol System [Sum of dsn coil capacities=5,820 mbh] Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 2 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 7 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Hpl 3: Glycol System [Sum of dsn coil capacities=5,820 mbh] Boiler - 003 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=5,820 mbh / 69.29 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 902.8 643.6 202.2 85.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 376.3 649.1 5,076.31,248.4 911.9Oil (therms) 8.4 7.1 5.6 2.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.5 4.6 5.9 8.4Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 937.8 785.1 425.7 273.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.7 799.2 887.6 6,899.61,325.3 1,293.2Electric (kWh) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 2,718.1 2,275.8 1,233.9 791.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.6 2,316.5 2,572.6 19,998.83,841.5 3,748.3Electric (kWh) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8Peak (kW) Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 233.5 195.5 106.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 199.0 221.0 1,718.0330.0 322.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 3,052.4 2,555.7 1,385.7 888.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 562.1 2,601.4 2,889.0 22,458.74,313.9 4,209.4Electric (kWh) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 2,500.7 2,093.7 1,135.2 728.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.5 2,131.2 2,366.8 18,398.93,534.1 3,448.5Electric (kWh) 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4Peak (kW) Sys 1: AHU-1 Main Building VAV AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=34,485 cfm / 35.83 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 5,972.7 6,882.4 5,834.2 6,420.3 4,678.0 4,151.3 4,972.1 5,824.9 6,574.4 6,399.4 70,587.06,603.1 6,274.2Electric (kWh) 31.0 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=2,800 cfm / 1.32 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 231.5 285.5 264.7 298.5 116.3 105.7 121.6 270.7 280.7 261.8 2,728.8246.9 244.9Electric (kWh) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3Peak (kW) AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=38,140 cfm / 23.31 kW] (Main Return Fan) 2,286.8 2,651.2 2,242.0 2,615.2 2,313.3 1,988.4 2,263.4 2,316.7 2,510.7 2,457.1 28,582.82,530.2 2,407.7Electric (kWh) 16.1 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.2 19.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.2Peak (kW) Sys 2: AHU-4 Gym System Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 2 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 8 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Sys 2: AHU-4 Gym System FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=36,000 cfm / 25.68 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 7,883.8 7,601.3 5,855.0 6,265.9 2,638.0 2,355.0 2,732.7 5,598.2 6,548.4 7,858.1 72,798.89,167.8 8,294.6Electric (kWh) 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=38,100 cfm / 13.59 kW] (Main Return Fan) 3,952.4 3,848.2 2,996.8 3,330.2 1,588.2 1,397.7 1,529.5 2,939.5 3,312.9 3,972.6 37,624.04,587.4 4,168.7Electric (kWh) 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6Peak (kW) Sys 3: AHU-6 Shops FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=26,420 cfm / 23.56 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 4,956.7 5,376.2 4,619.5 5,153.1 2,590.3 2,313.7 2,677.4 4,687.2 5,503.0 5,425.8 55,280.66,480.4 5,497.2Electric (kWh) 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=11,800 cfm / 5.57 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 139.6 177.0 160.7 264.4 264.7 217.6 227.4 230.7 167.7 161.6 2,313.3152.5 149.3Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.1 4.9 4.7 4.7 2.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.9Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=26,420 cfm / 16.49 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 136.2 193.7 216.5 352.0 394.0 303.6 373.8 308.6 176.0 158.5 2,907.5148.5 145.9Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.9 5.8 6.4 6.7 3.4 1.6 1.0 1.0 6.7Peak (kW) Sys 4: CH Vestibules FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=5,100 cfm / 0.48 kW] (Main Htg Fan) 10.5 16.3 10.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 10.7 14.1 98.111.4 12.9Electric (kWh) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3Peak (kW) Sys 5: AHU-2 Music AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=6,827 cfm / 6.26 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 1,199.1 1,385.7 1,175.4 1,266.1 560.5 503.2 563.6 1,150.8 1,333.6 1,282.2 13,027.61,343.4 1,264.1Electric (kWh) 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3Peak (kW) AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=7,418 cfm / 4.99 kW] (Main Return Fan) 747.8 875.9 748.7 842.9 418.3 362.2 385.5 752.8 838.6 807.0 8,405.7835.3 790.6Electric (kWh) 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Peak (kW) Sys 6: AHU-3 Auditorium Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 2 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 9 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 2 VSD on AHU-2 and RET-2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Sys 6: AHU-3 Auditorium FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=9,190 cfm / 6.56 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 3,947.2 4,242.6 4,080.6 4,158.0 3,803.2 4,113.3 3,909.6 4,040.6 4,279.1 4,233.2 49,588.74,390.6 4,390.6Electric (kWh) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=9,503 cfm / 3.39 kW] (Main Return Fan) 1,975.2 2,128.4 2,050.6 2,108.5 1,941.8 2,089.6 1,979.2 2,041.3 2,145.3 2,123.1 24,977.22,195.8 2,198.5Electric (kWh) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4Peak (kW) Sys 7: AHU-7 - Kitchen FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=4,000 cfm / 3.57 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 501.5 590.6 516.5 573.5 326.4 263.9 329.6 520.0 580.7 554.3 5,824.1539.3 527.9Electric (kWh) 2.9 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=5,000 cfm / 3.30 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 509.1 620.6 551.3 622.6 243.7 172.9 245.0 562.7 596.6 566.1 5,782.8555.2 537.1Electric (kWh) 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=4,000 cfm / 2.85 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.60.0 0.0Electric (kWh) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9Peak (kW) Sys 8: AHU-5 Locker Rooms FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=8,800 cfm / 6.28 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 1,663.7 1,619.6 1,277.4 1,422.9 681.7 605.0 701.0 1,294.2 1,408.5 1,494.0 15,876.82,120.7 1,588.1Electric (kWh) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=6,000 cfm / 2.83 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 23.8 32.0 30.3 71.8 66.7 54.5 53.5 62.1 30.0 29.2 505.425.6 26.0Electric (kWh) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 2.3 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=8,800 cfm / 2.35 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 20.0 26.3 24.4 47.9 51.1 41.6 41.6 41.6 26.4 24.0 388.321.7 21.7Electric (kWh) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7Peak (kW) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 2 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 10 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 3 Variable Speed Pumping Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Lights 28,352.8 34,000.8 29,903.4 32,672.0 13,250.8 12,459.4 13,812.8 29,903.4 32,672.0 31,232.2 319,617.031,343.2 30,014.3Electric (kWh) 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7 173.7Peak (kW) Misc. Ld 10,119.5 12,250.0 10,652.1 11,717.3 825.2 750.2 862.7 10,652.1 11,717.3 11,184.7 102,568.011,184.7 10,652.1Electric (kWh) 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0Peak (kW) Energy Recovery Parasitics 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 3.50.3 0.3Electric (kWh) Cooling Coil Condensate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.60.0 0.0Recoverable Water (1000gal) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Peak (1000gal/Hr) Bsu 1: Parking lot lights 28,560.0 31,620.0 16,200.0 16,740.0 16,200.0 16,740.0 16,740.0 16,200.0 26,040.0 25,200.0 267,900.031,620.0 26,040.0Electric (kWh) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Peak (kW) Bsu 2: Domestic Hot Water Load 1,431.0 1,701.0 1,512.0 1,641.6 700.2 676.8 728.1 1,512.0 1,641.6 1,571.4 16,220.71,582.2 1,522.8Proc. Hot Water (therms) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Peak (therms/Hr) Cpl 1: No Cooling [Sum of dsn coil capacities=307.5 tons] Hpl 1: Main Building Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=7,349 mbh] Boiler - 001 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=7,349 mbh / 87.50 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 7,270.5 6,418.0 3,246.8 2,463.0 1,097.8 1,113.9 1,147.5 2,264.7 4,877.5 6,081.8 52,449.59,198.0 7,270.2Oil (therms) 56.0 50.5 42.3 22.3 15.4 4.6 4.6 4.6 16.4 30.5 37.5 44.3 56.0Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 1,704.0 1,886.5 1,825.7 1,886.5 1,825.7 1,886.5 1,886.5 1,825.7 1,886.5 1,825.7 22,212.21,886.5 1,886.5Electric (kWh) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 4,939.0 5,468.1 5,291.8 5,468.2 5,291.8 5,468.2 5,468.1 5,291.8 5,468.2 5,291.8 64,383.05,468.2 5,468.2Electric (kWh) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4Peak (kW) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 3 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 11 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 3 Variable Speed Pumping Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Hpl 1: Main Building Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=7,349 mbh] Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 336.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 372.0 360.0 372.0 360.0 4,380.0372.0 372.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 5,546.5 6,140.7 5,942.7 6,140.7 5,942.6 6,140.7 6,140.7 5,942.7 6,140.7 5,942.7 72,302.26,140.7 6,140.7Electric (kWh) 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3Peak (kW) Variable Volume Heating Water Pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 650.3 481.3 196.9 300.4 131.7 121.2 137.8 275.7 305.8 485.7 4,639.0907.8 644.5Electric (kWh) 7.5 5.9 3.4 1.8 1.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.8 1.9 3.0 4.6 7.5Peak (kW) Hpl 2: Perimeter Heating [Sum of dsn coil capacities=1,402 mbh] Boiler - 002 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=1,402 mbh / 16.69 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 286.7 381.1 255.4 123.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 103.6 266.5 363.5 2,457.7320.1 357.2Oil (therms) 7.6 6.8 5.1 3.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 3.2 5.0 6.3 7.6Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 177.0 259.3 191.1 122.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 101.6 189.6 198.3 1,645.1200.3 205.1Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 513.2 751.5 553.8 356.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 294.4 549.6 574.9 4,768.5580.5 594.5Electric (kWh) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4Peak (kW) Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 183.0 268.0 197.5 127.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 105.0 196.0 205.0 1,700.5207.0 212.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 576.3 844.0 622.0 399.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 330.7 617.2 645.6 5,355.0651.9 667.6Electric (kWh) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 354.1 518.6 382.1 245.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 203.2 379.2 396.7 3,290.3400.5 410.2Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0Peak (kW) Hpl 3: Glycol System [Sum of dsn coil capacities=5,820 mbh] Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 3 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 12 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 3 Variable Speed Pumping Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Hpl 3: Glycol System [Sum of dsn coil capacities=5,820 mbh] Boiler - 003 [Nominal Capacity/F.L.Rate=5,820 mbh / 69.29 Therms] (Heating Equipment) 902.8 643.6 202.2 85.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 376.3 649.1 5,076.31,248.4 911.9Oil (therms) 8.4 7.1 5.6 2.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.5 4.6 5.9 8.4Peak (therms/Hr) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 937.8 785.1 425.7 273.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.7 799.2 887.6 6,899.61,325.3 1,293.2Electric (kWh) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Peak (kW) Boiler forced draft fan (Misc Accessory Equipment) 2,718.1 2,275.8 1,233.9 791.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.6 2,316.5 2,572.6 19,998.83,841.5 3,748.3Electric (kWh) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8Peak (kW) Cntl panel & interlocks - 0.5 KW (Misc Accessory Equipment) 233.5 195.5 106.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 199.0 221.0 1,718.0330.0 322.0Electric (kWh) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Peak (kW) Fuel oil circulation pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 3,052.4 2,555.7 1,385.7 888.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 562.1 2,601.4 2,889.0 22,458.74,313.9 4,209.4Electric (kWh) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Peak (kW) Heating water circ pump (Misc Accessory Equipment) 2,500.7 2,093.7 1,135.2 728.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.5 2,131.2 2,366.8 18,398.93,534.1 3,448.5Electric (kWh) 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4Peak (kW) Sys 1: AHU-1 Main Building VAV AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=34,485 cfm / 35.83 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 5,972.7 6,882.4 5,834.2 6,420.3 4,678.0 4,151.3 4,972.1 5,824.9 6,574.4 6,399.4 70,587.06,603.1 6,274.2Electric (kWh) 31.0 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=2,800 cfm / 1.32 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 231.5 285.5 264.7 298.5 116.3 105.7 121.6 270.7 280.7 261.8 2,728.8246.9 244.9Electric (kWh) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3Peak (kW) AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=38,140 cfm / 23.31 kW] (Main Return Fan) 2,286.8 2,651.2 2,242.0 2,615.2 2,313.3 1,988.4 2,263.4 2,316.7 2,510.7 2,457.1 28,582.82,530.2 2,407.7Electric (kWh) 16.1 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.2 19.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.2Peak (kW) Sys 2: AHU-4 Gym System Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 3 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 13 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 3 Variable Speed Pumping Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Sys 2: AHU-4 Gym System FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=36,000 cfm / 25.68 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 7,883.8 7,601.3 5,855.0 6,265.9 2,638.0 2,355.0 2,732.7 5,598.2 6,548.4 7,858.1 72,798.89,167.8 8,294.6Electric (kWh) 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=38,100 cfm / 13.59 kW] (Main Return Fan) 3,952.4 3,848.2 2,996.8 3,330.2 1,588.2 1,397.7 1,529.5 2,939.5 3,312.9 3,972.6 37,624.04,587.4 4,168.7Electric (kWh) 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6Peak (kW) Sys 3: AHU-6 Shops FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=26,420 cfm / 23.56 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 4,956.7 5,376.2 4,619.5 5,153.1 2,590.3 2,313.7 2,677.4 4,687.2 5,503.0 5,425.8 55,280.66,480.4 5,497.2Electric (kWh) 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=11,800 cfm / 5.57 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 139.6 177.0 160.7 264.4 264.7 217.6 227.4 230.7 167.7 161.6 2,313.3152.5 149.3Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.1 4.9 4.7 4.7 2.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.9Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=26,420 cfm / 16.49 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 136.2 193.7 216.5 352.0 394.0 303.6 373.8 308.6 176.0 158.5 2,907.5148.5 145.9Electric (kWh) 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.9 5.8 6.4 6.7 3.4 1.6 1.0 1.0 6.7Peak (kW) Sys 4: CH Vestibules FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=5,100 cfm / 0.48 kW] (Main Htg Fan) 10.5 16.3 10.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 10.7 14.1 98.111.4 12.9Electric (kWh) 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3Peak (kW) Sys 5: AHU-2 Music AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=6,827 cfm / 6.26 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 1,199.1 1,385.7 1,175.4 1,266.1 560.5 503.2 563.6 1,150.8 1,333.6 1,282.2 13,027.61,343.4 1,264.1Electric (kWh) 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3Peak (kW) AF w/VFD Crit Zn Reset [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=7,418 cfm / 4.99 kW] (Main Return Fan) 747.8 875.9 748.7 842.9 418.3 362.2 385.5 752.8 838.6 807.0 8,405.7835.3 790.6Electric (kWh) 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Peak (kW) Sys 6: AHU-3 Auditorium Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 3 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 14 of 15 EQUIPMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION By RS Consulting Alternative: 3 Variable Speed Pumping Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TotalEquipment - Utility ------- Monthly Consumption ------- Sys 6: AHU-3 Auditorium FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=9,190 cfm / 6.56 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 3,947.2 4,242.6 4,080.6 4,158.0 3,803.2 4,113.3 3,909.6 4,040.6 4,279.1 4,233.2 49,588.74,390.6 4,390.6Electric (kWh) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=9,503 cfm / 3.39 kW] (Main Return Fan) 1,975.2 2,128.4 2,050.6 2,108.5 1,941.8 2,089.6 1,979.2 2,041.3 2,145.3 2,123.1 24,977.22,195.8 2,198.5Electric (kWh) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4Peak (kW) Sys 7: AHU-7 - Kitchen FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=4,000 cfm / 3.57 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 501.5 590.6 516.5 573.5 326.4 263.9 329.6 520.0 580.7 554.3 5,824.1539.3 527.9Electric (kWh) 2.9 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=5,000 cfm / 3.30 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 509.1 620.6 551.3 622.6 243.7 172.9 245.0 562.7 596.6 566.1 5,782.8555.2 537.1Electric (kWh) 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=4,000 cfm / 2.85 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.60.0 0.0Electric (kWh) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9Peak (kW) Sys 8: AHU-5 Locker Rooms FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=8,800 cfm / 6.28 kW] (Main Clg Fan) 1,663.7 1,619.6 1,277.4 1,422.9 681.7 605.0 701.0 1,294.2 1,408.5 1,494.0 15,876.82,120.7 1,588.1Electric (kWh) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=6,000 cfm / 2.83 kW] (Room Exhaust Fan) 23.8 32.0 30.3 71.8 66.7 54.5 53.5 62.1 30.0 29.2 505.425.6 26.0Electric (kWh) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 2.3 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.3Peak (kW) FC Centrifugal const vol [DsnAirflow/F.L.Rate=8,800 cfm / 2.35 kW] (System Exhaust Fan) 20.0 26.3 24.4 47.9 51.1 41.6 41.6 41.6 26.4 24.0 388.321.7 21.7Electric (kWh) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7Peak (kW) Project Name:TRACE® 700 v6.2.7 calculated at 04:08 PM on 02/17/2012North Pole High School Dataset Name: NP High School.trc Alternative - 3 Equipment Energy Consumption report page 15 of 15 APPENDIX I – TREND LOG INFORMATION 34.7% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 20 40 60 80 100 OAT RAT MAT OA % NorthPole High School - AHU-1 Trend Logs for Friday Jan 13th, 2012 PercentOutside Air Return Air Temp Mixed Air Temp 12.9% 5.8% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% -40 -20 0 20 05:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021:3022:00OA % This Should Be Zero 80% 100% 120% 140% 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 OSA HWS HWR total North Pole HS - Boiler Plant - Jan 12 Through Jan 14 AHU OSA Dampers Open Boiler Plant Capacity 0% 20% 40% 60% -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 21:5022:5023:5000:5001:5002:5003:5004:5005:5006:5007:5008:5009:5010:5011:5012:5013:5014:5015:5016:5017:5018:5019:5020:5021:5022:5023:5000:5001:5002:5003:5004:5005:5006:5007:5008:5009:5010:5011:5012:5013:5014:5015:50 -10 0 10 20 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Sys Mbh OSA Poly. (Sys Mbh) North Pole High Schoool - Heating Load For Tuesday Jan 17th Based on Heating Water Supply and Return Temperatures AssumingConstant Flow -40 -30 -20 0 500 1000 1500 00:0000:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:30 8 10 12 14 16 18 170 175 180 185 North Pole HS Boiler Plant - Jan 14th - All Boilers Enabled DeltaT Heating Water Supply Temp 0 2 4 6 155 160 165 Heating Water Return Temp APPENDIX J – FLOOR PLANS