Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUS Hydro Resource Assessment for Alaska 11-1997DOE/ID-10430(AK) U.S. Hydropower Resource Assessment for Alaska Prepared by: Alison M. Conner James E. Francfort Project Manager: Ben N. Rinehart Published November 1997 Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Renewable Energy Products Department Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-94ID13223 U.S. Hydropower Resource Assessment for Alaska INTRODUCTION In June 1989, the U.S. Department of En- ergy initiated the development of a National Energy Strategy to identify the energy resources available to support the expanding demand for energy in the United States. Public hearings conducted as part of the strategy development process indicated that undeveloped hydropower resources were not well defined. As a result, the Department of Energy established an inter- agency Hydropower Resource Assessment Team to ascertain the undeveloped hydropower potential. In connection with these efforts by the Department of Energy, the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory designed the Hydro- power Evaluation Software (HES), which has been used to perform a resource assessment of the undeveloped conventional hydropower potential in over 30 states. This report presents the results of the hydropower resource assess- ment for the State of Alaska. Undeveloped pumped storage hydropower potential is not included. The HES was developed as a tool to meas- ure undeveloped hydropower potential region- ally or by state. The software is not intended to provide precise development factors for individ- ual sites, but to provide regional or state totals. Because the software was developed as a generic measurement tool encompassing national issues, regional and state totals must be considered judiciously; various local issues may skew undeveloped hydropower potential totals. The information for the resource assessment was compiled from the Federal Energy Regula- tory Commission's Hydroelectric Power Re- sources Assessment database and several other sources. Refer to DOE/ID-10338, the User's Manual (Francfort, Matthews, Rinehart 1991) for the specifics of the software and to DOE/ID-10430.1, the Status Report (Conner, Francfort, Rinehart 1996) for an overview of all resource assessment activities to date. Model Development Hydropower Evaluation Software, both a probability -factor computer model and a data- base, is a menu -driven program that is intended to be user-friendly. Computer screens and report -generation capabilities were developed to meet the needs of users nationwide. The software uses environmental attribute data to generate an overall project environmental suitability factor (PESF) between 0.1 and 0.9, where 0.9 indicates the highest likelihood of development and 0.1 indicates the lowest likelihood of development. The suitability factors depend on the unique environmental attributes of each potential site. They reflect the considerations that (a) environmental concerns can make a potential site unacceptable, prohib- iting its development (for a suitability factor of 0.1), or (b) if there are no environmental concerns, there is no negative effect on the likelihood of site development (for a suitability factor of 0.9). A combination of attributes can result in a lower suitability factor because multiple environmental considerations would reduce the likelihood that a site may be devel- oped to its physical potential. Model Goal The goal of the HES is to assemble an accurate resource database of all sites with undeveloped hydropower potential in the United States for use as a planning tool to determine the viable national hydropower potential. Unde- veloped hydropower potential is not limited to the development of new sites; it also includes the development of additional hydropower - generating capacity at sites that currently have hydropower, but are not developed to their full potential. This undeveloped hydropower poten- tial is a source of nonpolluting, renewable ener- gy available to meet the growing power needs of the United States. The HES should help make this goal obtainable and ensure a set of uniform criteria for national assessment. Dam Status The effects of environmental attributes vary by dam status. The dam status classifica- tions used are as follows: W = Developed hydropower site with current power generation, but the total hydropower po- tential has not been fully de- veloped. Only the undeveloped hydropower potential is dis- cussed in this report. W/O = Developed site without current power generation. The site has some type of developed im- poundment or diversion struc- ture, but no developed hydro- power generating capability. U = Undeveloped site. The site does not have power genera- tion capability nor a developed impoundment or diversion structure. ASSESSMENT RESULTS Summary Results A total of 119 sites (Table 1) have been identified and assessed for their undeveloped hydropower potential. The HES results for individual site capacities range from 6 kilowatts (kW) to 510 megawatts (MW). The majority (79%) of the sites in Alaska are less than 10 MW (Figure 1). The nonmodeled undeveloped hydropower potential total for Alaska was identified as 4,042 MW. The HES results lowers this estimate about 47% to 2,157 MW. The greatest reduction in undeveloped hydropower potential, by MW, occurs at sites with some type of developed impoundment or diversion structure, but no current power generation capability (W/O category). These sites have a HES-modeled undeveloped hydropower potential of 1,610 MW, a 1,256-MW reduction in the estimated undeveloped hydropower potential (Figure 2). Figure 3 correlates the number of sites that have undeveloped hydropower potential with the total megawatts of HES-modeled undeveloped hydropower potential. The developed sites without power have the largest average unde- veloped hydropower potential of about 27 MW per site (Figure 3). The 119 identified sites are located within 10 major river basins. The number of sites per major river basin ranges from 2 in the Copper River Basin to 37 in the Juneau Group River Basin (Figure 4). Fifty-three percent of the undeveloped hydropower potential in the State of Alaska is contained within the Susitna River Basin (Figure 5). Table 1. Undeveloped hydropower potential summary for Alaska. The table contains the nonmodeled undeveloped nameplate potential and the HES-modeled undeveloped potential totals. Number of projects Nameplate potential HES-modeled potential (MW) (MW) With Power 3 64.7 58.0 W/O Power 60 2,866.2 1,609.9 Undeveloped 56 1,111.4 489.5 State Total 119 4,042.3 2,157.4