HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacific NW Small Sacle Hydro Resource and site ranking info April 1981U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
REGION X
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE
AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
A L,�eS KA
PIED IERTY OF., —
AlaskC_ Power Authority
8:4 W. -5th Ave.
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
APRIL 1981
center6e ineerin
U. S. Department of Energy - Region X
J
Pacific Northwest Small Scale Hydroelectric Resource and Site Ranking Information
DESCRIPTIVE AND REFERENCE INFORMATION
General This Small Scale Hydroelectric Resource and Site
Ranking Information report was prepared for the
U. S. Department of Energy, Region X, Seattle,
Washington by Center 4 Engineering, Inc. of
Redmond, Oregon (Contract AC51-80RO00098).
The information base represents a composite of
major existing data bases, brought together here
to provide available information about those
small scale (100kW to 30 MW) hydroelectric
resources in the Pacific Northwest which appear
to be suitable for development. Except for a
limited number of site visits (less than 1% of
all locations listed), no field verification
of the data was performed or is planned within
the project. Omissions and errors in data are
to be expected due to the limitations of available
data, although minimal interpretive analysis was
conducted in reporting the results. The reader
is therefore cautioned that information may be
indicative rather than conclusive. Further
investigation, warranted by the nature of the
data here, should be the basis for any decisions
concerning specific developments.
The primary data source for the inventory was the
National Hydropower Study, as developed by the
U. S. Corps of Engineers.
The inventory provides information for 2046 small
scale hydroelectric resources/sites in the four
Pacific Northwest States of Alaska, Idaho, Oregon,
and Washington. The order of presentation is by:
State
Priority
County
Stream
Project Name
Each site is reported on a separate page with up
to 51 data elements.
It is likely that other eligible hydroelectric
resources can be identified to supplement the
existing inventory. These resources, however,
are the ones identified from major existing data
bases.
The perspective in stating data in this report
is the Public Utilities Policies Act of 1978
(PURPA), as amended by the Energy Security Act
of 1980. The legislation established certain
responsibilities for the U..S. Department of
Energy for small scale hydropower resources
development.
Installed capacity (projected installed capacity
for new development) - 100 to 30,000 kilowatts.
Existing facilities or undeveloped natural water
features capable of supporting hydroelectric
generation without adverse effects'on those
features:.
Excluding sites in prohibited locations such
as national monuments and wild or scenic rivers.
In many instances, potential hydroelectric resource
developments present alternatives which allow bene-
fits to be optimized according to local needs. A
need for peaking, power, for example, could influence
capacity sizing decisions. Likewise, projects at
some currently undeveloped sites -are less likely to
impose environmental impact if less than the full
theoretical capacity is developed (less than full
flow is used, for example). For this reason certain
parameters, found to be listed with one value in one
report and with another value elsewhere, may need
adjustment for specific projects.
Data Items Information follows about specific data items
appearing in the inventory (in order Of presentation).
DATE The report was generated with data made available
to the contractor to April 24, 1981.
STATE Four State are included in the inventory: Alaska,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. The scope of the
report is inclusive of the normal political boun-
daries of these States.
COUNTY The location of each resource is identified by
county, as stated in the source reports or as shown
on maps. In Alaska, "county" identifies the appro-
priate borough or municipality. Two county names
indicate a borderline site.
2
PRIORITY The resources have been grouped into "high",
"medium", and "low" development potential
groupings, based on a ranking mbthodology
applied uniformly to resources throughout the
region.
The "high" priority group is thought to be
especially promising for immediate development,
but no assurance exists that development can
occur without difficulties or objections; careful
investigation by potential developers is needed.
The "low" priority group is thought to offer poor
promise for hydroelectric development relative
to other possible resources, but this alone should
not be viewed as a deterrent to a developer who
has investigated the site further and found it
suitable for development. The "medium" priority
group consists largely of resources for which the
existing information is insufficient to state a
more opinionated ranking; prospective developers
are encouraged to seek additional facts which will
allow meaningful decisions.
PROJECT NAME
Name of existing or potential project as indicated
by the data sources.
LAT/LONG
Latitude and longitude of the resource location,
stated in a format identifying degrees, minutes,
and tenths of a minute.
STREAM NAME
Name of primary water stream entering/leaving the
project site.
MUNICIPALITY
Name of closest community of approximately 1,000
population or larger - used as a project locator.
RESOURCE TYPE
The project type coded in the third character of
the NHS identification number (see below) is
described here. Project types in the NITS scope
include new storage projects with major dams that
v;ould'not be permissible under the DOE program;
but the type designators have been retained without
change even though the assumptions for them have
been changed for purposes of this study.
OWNER Name of owner of project or project site, where
identified.
ELEC UTILITY Name of electric utility serving at and/or near
the resource location. The electrical utility is
considered to be a potential developer of the
resource or purchaser of its power.
3
OTHER DEVELOPER Name of other developer, where identified.
PROJ PURPOSE The basic purpose(s) for the project as identi-
fied by the data sources. These include signifi-
cantly, irrigation, recreation, water supply, and
flood control, in addition to hydroelectric.
PROJ DEP/INDEP Dependent/Independent nature of a proposed project:
i.e., where several similar projects have been
proposed at nearby sites, it may be that only one
can be developed.
PROD STATUS The general development status of the project -
ranging from proposed studies to'facilities in
operation.
NHS ID # National Hydropower Study identification number.
This is the unique identifier for each project
as designated by the U. S. Corps of Engineers.
Where no existing identification number had been
established, a new identifier was assigned by
the DOE contractor in cooperation with the Corps
of Engineers.
The identification number is coded. The first two
characters identify the State where the resource
is located. The third character identifies resource
type (see above). The next three characters are
an abbreviation for the Corps of Engineers' district
office responsible for hydropower resources in the
designated area. The final four digits are numbers
sequentially assigned to projects sites within the
respective Corps' area.
Engineering/Economic Factors
FLOW AV ANNUAL Average annual inflow of the stream through the
project site, expressed'in cubic feet per second.
NET POWER HEAD Net power head, expressed in feet, available at
the project site. Net power head includes only
the usable pressure head and excludes items such
as hydraulic losses. It is to be recognized that
project design may not use all available head.
CAPACITY, INSTALLED Total generating capacity of all new generators
proposed for installation at the site, expressed
in kilowatts. Installed capacity may be less than,
equal to, or in excess of theoretical average
capacity of the stream, depending on design con-
siderations and decisions.
4
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
POWER STORM FLOW:- RATIO
u
Annual energy production projected for the stream
at the designated installed capacity, expressed
in megawatt hours (i.e., thousands of kilowatt
hours).
Ratio represented by power storage (cubic feet)
divided by average annual inflow flow (cubic
feet per year). The numerical value represents
the decimal part of a year of flow storage avail-
able at the site. 'In general, this value has been
set to zero for all resources except existing dams,
because new projects are presumed to be non -storage
in character.
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR The annual plant factor of the generators, expressed
as the ratio of expected annual energy production
divided by the energy production which would occur
if the installed generators were operated at full
capacity throughout the year.
EQUIPMENT SELECTION The nurber of generating units selected for instal-
lation as indicated by the data source.
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN New investment in civil structures and generating
facilities for the proposed project, expressed in
thousands of dollar. Where investment estimates
were provided by the source studies based on con-
struction of new storage projects at previously
undeveloped sites, the dollar estimates have been
omitted in this report because alternative develop-
ment within the DOE program scope would require a
new set of investment figures. No attempt was made
to establish new dollar estimates for the alternative
project development. (The same comments apply to
other dollar estimates reported below).
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION New investment in electrical transmission facilities
to support the proposed project, expressed in thou-
sands of dollars. In general, the data sources pro-
vided estimates only for civil/generating structures,
which the contractor for this report supplemented
with transmission cost estimates to allow total
project costs to be considered.
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT Total new investment per unit of energy output,
expressed in dollars per annual megawatt -hour.
This is a measure of investment required per unit
of benefit.
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY Total new investment per unit of productive (elec-
trical) capacity proposed for installation, expressed
in dollars per kilowatt. This is a measure of invest-
ment required per unit of output capability_
AV COST OF ENERGY Average cost of energy produced by the project,
based on full coverage for all investment amorti-
zation (debt service) and operating costs, and
expressed in dollars per megawatt -hour of output
(or mils per kilowatt-hour).
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (x IOO) The ratio of anticipated total benefits (i.e.,
revenues from electrical power sales) for the
project compared to (divided by) anticipated
total costs of the project. No allowance ins made.
for the dollar value of ancillary benefits such as
flood control, irrigation, and recreation. The
ratio has been multiplied by 100 to give whole
numbers egivalent to two decimal places. Results
less than 100 indicate that costs will exceed
benefits. (The time value of money is considered
in presenting the results).
COMMENTS
(engineering section) Comments reserved primarily for additional
engineering/economic information pertinent to the
site. May list a source used by the National
Hydropower Study; these source abbreviations
usually are USGS (United States Geological Survey),
AHRI (an Alaska study), etc. As much information
as possible was transferred from the NHS original
material, their own criteria and notation. For
example, the words "marketing requirements" may
appear on this line or under the Comments line
below the Environmental/Social Acceptibility
Factors; this means only that the Corps of
Engineers (or other source agency) has yet to
investigate this aspect of the particular site.
Social/Environmental Acceptability Factors
Information contained in this section refers to
non-engineering/economic factors. Information
derived from sources that pertained to the develop-
ment of a storage facility has been slightly modified
to reflect the possible impact on the area surrounding
the site under the revised conditions.
PARKLANDS Information pertaining to any parklands, campgrounds,
etc. (other than designated wilderness lands and
national parks, which sites were eliminated during
preliminary screening). Items of general interest
such as type of recreational use, impact and distance
to the site were included. Rare II, or potential
wilderness areas were mentioned here also.
11
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC Potential Wild and Scenic Rivers and study areas
(sites on rivers formally designated under Federal
laws were excluded during the preliminary screening).
Both directly and indirectly impacted resources are
noted with available information on type, distance
and impact. Note is made that some potential and
study area information available to the public was
not in the major data sources for this inventory
and thus is not included in this study.
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS Estuarine and wetlands resources, noted as to
type, and extent of impact as appropriate. Other
natural water body related comments are also
included on this line.
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS Directly and indirectly impacted resources due to
effects of development on campgrounds, recreational
reservoirs, etc.; listed with the nature of the
impact, present and intensity of use, and distance
of the recreational facility from the site.
CULT RESOURCE SITES Resources at sites designated or potentially
designated for significant history, archeology,
or cultural values.
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB Resources at sites where significant fishery
impacts were anticipated and noted, including
both standing water bodies and streams. Notations
are included as to habitat type, impacted fishery,
nature of impact, and proximity upstream or down-
stream of fish hatcheries.
FISHERIES HABITAT Resources at sites where significant fishery
impacts were anticipated and -noted, including
both standing water bodies and streams. Notations
are included as to habitat type, impacted fishery,
nature of.impact, and proximity upstream or down-
stream of fish hatcheries.
ENDANGERED SPECIES Resources at sites where endangered flora and fauna
could be affected. Information in sources includes
the biological type affected.
WATER QUALITY Adverse or positive impacts to water quality
anticipated from project development, where water
quality is important. This category includes
comments on sedimentation, flow augmentation,
temperature, etc. as available.
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED This section allows consideration of other impacts
to natural resources not covered in the above
categories but of potential importance in site
development. Location within a National Forest is
an example.
7
POLITICAL FACTORS Miscellaneous information referring to political
aspects of site acceptibility.
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES Similar to the above, specifically federal and state
information. "State support" will often be noted as
contained in NHS data sources without further reference.
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON Negative or positive local public attitudes and reaction
to possible development; in fact, because of the lack
of such information and because of the dearth of space
elsewhere, this line notes possible affects on the
local population or mentions resources in close prox-
imity and obviously important to local residents.
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON Environmental group attitudes and comments on possible
development: Audubon Society, fishing societies and
Department of Fish and Wildlife, etc.
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON Miscellaneous category noting possible social group
attitude and -comments toward a possible site.
UTILITY INTEREST Specific interest of a utility with name of utility,
if other than the local utility, and utility comments.
SOURCES The primary sources of information used in the
inventory. The first entry represents the major data
source; the second and sometimes the third entry
denote sources used for information not available
in the primary data source.
Abbreviated for ease of recognition; most common are:
AVEC - Alaska Village Electric Cooperative
WPRS - Western States - Inventory of Low -head Hydro-
electric Sites, Volumes I & II
NHS PRE - National Hydropower Preliminary Study
DOE ID#2 - A Resource Survey of Low -head Hydroelectric
Potential at Existing Dams and Proposed Sites in the
Pacific Northwest Region - Phase II
USGS - United States Geological Survey maps
COE - Corps of Engineers maps
APA - Alaska Power Authority maps
NPP - Northwest Power Pool
COMMENTS General comment line for additional information not
stated in the above listed categories; used also as a
run -over space for information belonging but not fitting
above. "Limited data" is the contractor's notation;
it is used to denote a lack of pertinent NHS economic
data that would usually be included in a site of this
type. "Note A(--) is used With sites falling into the
4,5,5,7 resource type categories (storage projects)
and not warranting transfer of economic data because of
NHS storage assumptions. The parentheses after "Note A"
encloses the NHS benefit/cost ratio for the proposed
storage project.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGTON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
O4/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM TAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE: TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PRO.J DEP / I NDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: AMBLER
AMBLER OPT. 1
67 05.0 / 157 50.0
JADE CREED
AMBLER
UNDEVELOPED / RUN OF RIVER
HLASKA VILLAGE ELECTRIC COOP
HYDROELECTRIC
I : INDEPENDENT
AK4NPA40O2
PRIORITY: HIGH
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*�***ENGINEERTNG / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
200
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
100
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
1225
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
3219
POWEP STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
.30
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVEy TMENT , STR CTURE& BEN
($1000 )
I NVESTIIENT , TRANSM I SS'I ON
($ 000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
I NVES TMENT t- CAPACI TY
($/KJ,4 )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($ / HWH )
BENEFIT/COsT RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
1979 PEAK DEMAND
— 100KW. OPT, INCL FULL CK DEV.
*-)�-->:*:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD / SC':EN T C
ESTI.JAR I ES/WETLANDS
RFCR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL, WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RED AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOE14CIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL_ GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
No
TRAIL., NEAR CREED`
RATED IN ' 8 E'er T SITES' CATEGORY BY AVEC:
SOURCES
COMMENTSe
AVEC USGS/APA MAPS
STORAGE S T TES FEAS I BL . I NTERT I E W/ SHUNONAK—KOBI.JLs
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL... SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING T NFORMAT I GN
04/26/81
STATE. ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT /LONG•
STREAM NAME.
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DE.P/TNOEP
NHS IV #
COUNTYr AMBLER
AMBLER OPT. 2
67 05.0 / 157 50.0
JADE CREEK
fi,MBLE'R
UNDEVELOPED / Ri1N OF RIVER
ALASKA VILLAGE ELEC COOP
'-iY�JROELECTR I C
I o INDEPENDENT
AK4NPA4001
PRIORITY: HIGH
PROD STATUS i IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC:
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
200
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
SO
CAPACITY, ! NSTAL LED
(KW)
370
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
972
POWER STOP/AV FLOW -RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
.SO
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSTON
($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPIJT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
1979 PEAK DEMAND
— 100KW. OPT. INCL_ FULL CK DEV.
*3**w�*FNVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR L..AKES/RESERVOTRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO!COP!
SOCIAL., GRP ATT PRO / C:i ;N
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO
TRAIL NEAR CREEK
YES. RATED IN 'LEST SITES' CATEGORY BY AVEC
AVEC. USGS AK MAPS
::STORAGE SITES FEASIBLE
r
5,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
8TATF : ALASKA COUNTY: BARROW—N. .-SLOPE PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT DAME
AWI.INA RIVER
tk:
1.9
� / RFS WITH Il T VERS I ON 4 MOO T F I EIl 9
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**** ENOINEERINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 528
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 317
CAPACITY, TNSTALLED tip(4) 21000
ENERGY PRODUCT T ON—ANI� UAL (MWH) 101000
POWER =TORiAV FLOW :RATIO 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECT T, �1►�! UNITE
INVESTME,.NT, STRUCTURE :OE'N ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWli/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($!KW )
AV COST CAE' ENERGY ($ MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS; AHRI 78
�*K***ENVTRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS YES
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
E STI.JAR I E:S I WETLANIIS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CU!..T RESOURCE, SITE
CRITICAL W I I.,I� L I FIE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER, NAT RF_S AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
E14V I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
LCTELI IN TESHEPUi;—I tTUKOK NAT WILDLIFE REI=UCsE.
NO
NO
SOURCES
NHS iaSOS/APA MAPS
COMMENT S o NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO.4
NOTE A (I. 6) NOT AVAIL FOR DEVELOPMENT
�*K***ENVTRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS YES
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
E STI.JAR I E:S I WETLANIIS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CU!..T RESOURCE, SITE
CRITICAL W I I.,I� L I FIE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER, NAT RF_S AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
E14V I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
LCTELI IN TESHEPUi;—I tTUKOK NAT WILDLIFE REI=UCsE.
NO
NO
SOURCES
NHS iaSOS/APA MAPS
COMMENT S o NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO.4
NOTE A (I. 6) NOT AVAIL FOR DEVELOPMENT
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY; FARROW--N. SLOPE PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
KUKPIJK
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
K(.1KPU
k. RIVER
UNDEVELOPED ! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*•�**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 99
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 1590
CAPAC T TY, INSTALLED (KW) 24000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 105850
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTMENT r STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 OO£� )
INVESTMENT , TRANS M I w S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENIVENEROY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
*mAi*AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLTFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRE':' /CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE`
COMMENTS:
NHS SAYS TAIL.WATER FREEZING
NO
DOUBTFUL
NHS. USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (` 2 )
') AK t 4
*mAi*AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLTFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRE':' /CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE`
COMMENTS:
NHS SAYS TAIL.WATER FREEZING
NO
DOUBTFUL
NHS. USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (` 2 )
') AK t 4
� DAKI 15
„1
U.Sq DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE. ALASKA COUNTY% SETHEL
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
I SAI'iAL I RIVE
MUNICIPALITY
DETHEL
iISARALI RIVER
05.5
IL
UNDEVELOPED / RF_SERVO I R ( MOD I F J ED )
PROD STATUS:
*�:*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
264
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
Soo
CAPAC T TY , INSTALLED
(Kw)
30000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON—AN14UAL
(MWH)
131000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNIT:
INVESTMENT,STRUC:TURE&GEN
(1�1000)
INVESTMF_NT.TRANSMISSION
($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($I W)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
PRIORITY % LOW
IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENVIRrjNMENTAL/SOCIA.L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
POTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
PROPOSED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER
LOC IN YUKON DELTA NAT. WILDLIFE REF.
NATIONAL LAND INTERESTS OPPOSE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
)`NHS. USGS/APA MAPS. PL--96-487
NOTE A (53) LINDER STUDY BY ALASKA PWR AUTH.
AID t 6
a
U.S. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: BRISTOL BAY DIV PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME BECHAROF
L.AT/LONG 58 09.0 / 156 48.0
STREAM NAME EGGEGIK RIVER
MUNICIPALITY EGGEC I K
RESOURCE TYPE L114DEVEI—OPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO._ PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC:
PROD DFP/TNDEP I INDEPENDENT PRGJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID # AK6NPA0015
** -�4ENO I NFE'R I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
57
FLOW AV ANNUAL.
(CFS)
2208
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
16000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
76000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
G
ANNUAL PLAINT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVESTMENT , STRa ACT RE&OEN
($1000 )
I NVESTMENT , TRANSM I w S I ON
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT('/MWH/YR)
T NVE STMENT /CAPAC I T`e
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHRI 7S
*�***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUAP:IES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HALE I TA'T
ENDANGERED SPECIES
I ES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/COM
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
LOC IN GECHAROF NAT . WILDLIFE REFUGE
NO
DOUBTFUL
SOURCES
COMMENTS i
DINS. USGS/APA "APS. PL 6-487
NOTE H (6 )
AKI i
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANK I NO INFORMATION
04/26/31
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: BR I STOL BAY D I V
PROJECT NAME
CAKE
ELVA
i.'"a J 11° DG. 0
D I LL I NG!-IANi
PRIORITY HIGH
UNDEVELOPED
LOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
P'RO J STATUS.
*A**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
259
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
52
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
1000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(mWH)
8000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.91
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVF.STMENT , STRUCTUPE&SEN
($1000 )
I NVESTME:NT, TRANSH I SS I ON
($1 OGEE )
INVESTMENTJENFRGY OUTPLIT (I/MWH/YR
)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
*****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
No
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC
NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES
NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
NO
FISHERIES HABITAT
NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
NO
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS ALAS KA POWER AUTHORITY SUPPORT
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST "DES
SOURCES NHS, USES/APA MAPS.
COMMENT=:: NOTE A 0) SEALING OF JOINT SETS IN DAM KEYWAY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
'ATE: ALASKA COUINTY: BRIS"! OL DAY DIV PRIORITY: MEDIUM
:OJECT NAME
LAKE
g
1�'Ak`FIC�NA1�: RIVER
IGIl�I(aIC9
/� r �r�A'g�; f
A
UNDEVELOPED ; RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*�***EN0I NEED I NG / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
T POWER HEAD (FT) 200
W AV ANNUAL C:F �) 3$0
PACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1.1000
'ERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 5000 �
`�iER STOR/AV PLOW :RATIO 0.
i'JUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.g1
'�J I PMENT SELECTION UNITS
':VESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
')ESTMENT, TRANSM I S S I ON ($1 GG0 )
VESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
VESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /KW )
COST �'Ef- ENERGY ($ / MWH )
AEFIT/=—'4T RATTO (X 100)
MMENTS -z AHR I 78
**��ENVIRONMENTA+L./SGClm4L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
RKLANDS 110
T'EN,rIAsL WILD/SCENIC NO
rUARIES/WETLANDS
C::R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
I _T RESOURCE SITES
T T I CAL WILDLIFE HAB IN T L I AMNA NATL RESOURCE FLANGE
tiHER I ES 14AR T TAT
()ANGERED SPECIES
FER QUALITY
I'T'Y
HER NAT RES AFFECTED
I _ T T I CAL. FACTORS
DERAL/STATE AGENCIES
i::A4L PUP ATT PRO/CON 1' O APPARENT OPPOSITION
)IR GR'P ATT PRO/CON
:IAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
€1- I TY INTEREST DOUBTDOUBTFUL,,,.
JRCES NHS. USES/APA MAPS. PL 96-487
1MENTS; NOTE A (29 )
**��ENVIRONMENTA+L./SGClm4L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
RKLANDS 110
T'EN,rIAsL WILD/SCENIC NO
rUARIES/WETLANDS
C::R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
I _T RESOURCE SITES
T T I CAL WILDLIFE HAB IN T L I AMNA NATL RESOURCE FLANGE
tiHER I ES 14AR T TAT
()ANGERED SPECIES
FER QUALITY
I'T'Y
HER NAT RES AFFECTED
I _ T T I CAL. FACTORS
DERAL/STATE AGENCIES
i::A4L PUP ATT PRO/CON 1' O APPARENT OPPOSITION
)IR GR'P ATT PRO/CON
:IAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
€1- I TY INTEREST DOUBTDOUBTFUL,,,.
JRCES NHS. USES/APA MAPS. PL 96-487
1MENTS; NOTE A (29 )
U.R. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RE13ION
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING I NFORMAT I Gail
04/26/91
STA"rE: ALASKA
COUNTY: BR I ti TOL TRAY D I V
PROJECT NAME
NISHLIK LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
TIKCHIK
PRIORITY- HIGH
RIVER
51.0
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSi IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POKIER HEAD (FT) 202
FLOW AV ANNUAL (rFS) 135
CAPACTTY, INSTALLED (KW) 4000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 18000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIFMEN*r SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT > S TRUCTIJRE&GEN ($1 COO )
IMVESTMENT,TRANSMI SIGN (�1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (x 100)
COMMENTS: DIVERTED TO lJPNUK LAKE POWER HOUSE
�***im:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR::
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETL..,ANDS
REIC:F' LAKIES/RESERVOIRti
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NA,r REy AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR.
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP' ATT FROXON
SOCIAL_ GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS. U GS / APA MAPS
NOTE A (20) AHR I 78 USGS
�***im:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR::
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETL..,ANDS
REIC:F' LAKIES/RESERVOIRti
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NA,r REy AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR.
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP' ATT FROXON
SOCIAL_ GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS. U GS / APA MAPS
NOTE A (20) AHR I 78 USGS
AID 1 10
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: AL.A KA
PROJECT DAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELI= C; # JTT. L T TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO J PURPOSE
PROD DE:P/ INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: PRISTOL SAY DIV PRIORITY; MEDIUM
aJPNUK LAKE
60 18.9 .' 1 5S 46.2
TIKCHIK RIVER
KASHEGELOK
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA0036
*0**i•'-ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PPODUC T I ON —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER OTOR/AV FLOW -RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT. STRI CTURE&GEN ($I000 )
INVESTMENTxTRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENEROY OUTPUT ($lMWH/YR )
I NVESI'Mt~NT/ CAFAC T TY ($IKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/C":OST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
P'ROJ STATUS a
FACTORS
169
3864
8000
39000
0
0.55
IDENTIFIED SITE
�***M�*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
E STIJARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
DOUBTFUL
SOURCES
COMMIw NTS s
NHS. iJSGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A(24)
U.S. DEPARTME WT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RADII I NG INFORMATION
04/26/31
' TATE a. ALA KIA COUNTY: BR I STOL BAY D I V PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME: UGASH I K LADE
LAT/LUNG 57 36.9 / 157 00.9
STREAM i NAME UGASH I K RIVER
MUNICIPALIT': PILOT POINT
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED I RES WITH DIVERSION ( MODIFIED )
OWNi" R
ELEiC: LIT I L I TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE: HYDROELECTRIC
PRO.. DEP / I NDE:P I : INDEPENDENT P'ROJ STATUS: I DENT I F I IUD SITE
NHS ID # AK7NPA0034
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWEP HEAD
(FT)
33
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
151E
CAPACITY. I NS,rALLED
(KW)
6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
SOODO
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
IMVESYMFNT,STRUCTURE&GEN
($JOOO)
I NVE STMENT, TRANSM I SS 1 ON
($1 OQ0 )
INVESTMENT/ENFIR Y ('UTPI_IT ($/MWH/YR )
INVEwTMENTICAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/CCIST RATIO
(X 1 D0 )
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78
*0*�-*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORE' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY TNTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO
LOC IN RECHAROF NAT. WILDLIFE REFUGE
NHS. IJS(3S / APA MAPS. PL 96 —487
NOTE A(12)
Ake 1 11
,D-:AK1 12
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04Y26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: BRISTOL BAY DIV
PROJECT NAME
GRANT LAKE
L.AT/LONG
STREAM MAME
WOOD
PRIORIT'N's HIGH
RIVER
I LL INOHAM
UNDEVELOPED32.0
/ RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSs IDENTIFIED SITE
*ENG I VEER I N0 / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 209'
FLOW AV ANNUAL_ ((IFS) 96
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2700
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL, (MWH) 1267
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NINE'S TMENT , STRUC:TURt:.&DEN ($1. 000 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 ',
INVESTMENT/ENERGY 0UTPUT(t/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENTS -CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 101)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
**i*m*ENVIRONMENTAL./SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR'S
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER EQUALITY
OTHER NAT RE7 AFFECTED
POL I T I GAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
t:OC':AL PUB ATT PRO: C:ON
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES NHS. lJSUS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS! NOTE A (1 S )
**i*m*ENVIRONMENTAL./SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR'S
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER EQUALITY
OTHER NAT RE7 AFFECTED
POL I T I GAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
t:OC':AL PUB ATT PRO: C:ON
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES NHS. lJSUS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS! NOTE A (1 S )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REOION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING NG INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: CORDOVA—MCCARTHY
PROJECT NAME
CRATER LAKE
LAT/LONG
60
STREAM NAME
CRATER LAKE
PRIORITY: HIGH
GC)RI'�OVA
'4. I14 40.8
l.)NDEVELCPEI� / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
ORT?OVA PUBLIC UTILITY
PROJ ETATUSe NHS FEASIBILITY STUDY
****ENGINEERINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1348
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 2
CAPACITY- INSTALLED '.I �W) 389
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL. (MWH) 1435
POWER STOR/AV FLOW %RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.42
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNIT'
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT.TRANSMISWION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTF�UT ($/MWH/YR )
T HVESTMENT /CFPAC I TY ($a/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY (`�/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST ST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTSa FEASIBILITY STUDY IN PROGRESS
*�*AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAU NO
FISHERIES HABITAT STOCKED WITH RAINBOWS — NO NATURAL OUTLET
ENUANOERED SPECIES NO
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REa AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP A'rT PR0/CnN
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
YES
NHS. USGS/APA MAP"
NOTE A(10) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRODABLE
Al 13
*�*AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAU NO
FISHERIES HABITAT STOCKED WITH RAINBOWS — NO NATURAL OUTLET
ENUANOERED SPECIES NO
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REa AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP A'rT PR0/CnN
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
YES
NHS. USGS/APA MAP"
NOTE A(10) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRODABLE
Al 13
AK1 14
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE R ANK I NO INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
L.AT / LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO J PURPOSE
PRO.J DEP/ INDEP
NHS ID
COUNTY; CORDOVA—MCCARTHY
PRIORITY: HIGH
HUMPBACK CREEK
60 37.8 /145 37.8
HUMPBACK CREEK
CORDOVA
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION ( MOIL I F I ED )
HYDROELECTRIC:
Is I NDEPENDFNT PROD STATUS; NHS FEASIBILITY STUDY
AK7NPAG026
*4e: *ENO I VEER I NO / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
349
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(C:FS)
25
CAPACITY: INSTALLED
(k:W)
1010
ENERGY PRODI_ICTIO14--ANNUAL
(MWH)
3296
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.37
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMEWT> STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
I NVESTMENT r TRANSM I SS I ON
($1 0O0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATiO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
FEASIBILITY
STUDY IN PROGRESS
*��*-�ENVIR+ NMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
NO
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES
NO
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAS
NO
FISHERIES HABITAT
NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
NO
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENC TE:S
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
HEADWATERS IN C:HUOaAH NATIONAL FOREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NIAS. USCS /APA MAPS
MOTE A (1 O) SITE AVAIL.. FOR DFVELOPMENT
,. "AK1 15
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALAS KA C'OUNTY n CORDOVA—MCCARTHY PRIORITY: MED I UM
PROJECT NAME
POWER CREEK
k,ATALL��
{a d�. �? ! 14 30.9
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS: NHS FEASIBILITY STUDY
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD I F'T' f �P 0
FLOW AV ANNUAL ( CFO:) 283
CAPAC T TY , I N STALLED (KW) 14000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON-�AMNUAL (MWH) ��ra000
POWER s,rOR!AV FLOW -.RATIO 0ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EWU I PMFNT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRtaCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVE; wTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT;'ENERGY C€1_aTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH?
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS; FE.AS. STUDY IN PROGRESS.
FERC: DATA PF>58 AHRI 70
*##**ENVIROtIMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL IUD ATT PRO/CON
ENVrR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUT I I_ T TY INTEREST
NO
I -AND OWNERSHIP CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (67) DEVELOPMENT FEASIBLE
FERC: DATA PF>58 AHRI 70
*##**ENVIROtIMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL IUD ATT PRO/CON
ENVrR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUT I I_ T TY INTEREST
NO
I -AND OWNERSHIP CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (67) DEVELOPMENT FEASIBLE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDkOELECTR I C RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING I NFORMAT T CAN
04/26/81
STATE.. ALASKA COUNTY. CORDOVA-MCCARTHY PRIORITY: LOW
PROJECT NAME POWER CREEK 1
LAT / LONG 60 35.1 / 145 32.4
STREAM NAME POWER CREEK
MUNICIPALITY CORDOVA
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / DIVERSION
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY CORDOVA PUBLIC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP Ds DEPENDENT
PROD STATUS: STUDY PROPOSED
NHS T D # AK5NPA0039
*-�A*w*ENG I NEER I NG / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
359
FLOW AV ANNUAL_ (CFS)
251
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (Kw)
-9GO0
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH)
26()00
POWER STGR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.59
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRI. CTURE&GEN ($1000 )
37635
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION ($1 044)
400
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OU'T'PUT ($/MWH/YR)
1462
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($11ew)
7607
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
104
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
24
COMMENTS: ALTERNATE TO PROJECT NPA0040. STUDY PROPOSED
*Om***ENVIRONMENTAL/SCSCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/ SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA'T RES AFFECTED
P'OLYTICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL... GRP ATT PRO /CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
1-40
No
RES & ANAD. FISH SOCKEYES SPAWN DWNSTRM
i
YES
NHS. USES/APA MAPS
POT. HUGE AVALANCHE INTO RIV. BED/FERC DATA
LI. S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REG I GIN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE s ALASKA COUNTY s CORDOVA—MCCARTHY PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
POWER CREED 2
�O / 14 1.4
CORDOVA
UIVDEVELOPED / RES WITH D I VEILS I ON ( MUD I F I ED )
•ORI�OVA PULL I C UTILITY
PRO�J STATUS: STUDY PROPOSED
*****EMOIVEERINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 499
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 160
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (KW) 10540
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 50000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW sRATTO 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STPUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT.TRANSMISSIOaf ($I000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
TNVEW TMENT/CAPAC:I TY ($IKW )
AV CO--,%T OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
SENEF I T /COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: ALTERNATE TO NPA0039 AND NP'A0057.
STUDY PROPOSED
*�:,m-�:ENVIRONME:NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTAB'CLITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS mo
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTIJARIES/WETLANDS
RE'CR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITTCA�L WILDLIFE' HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /' STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
GRP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AKI 17
SOCKEYES SPAWN DOWNSTREAM
YES
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
POT. HUGE AVALANCHE
NOTE A (1 5 )
INTO RESV. /FERC DATA
STUDY PROPOSED
*�:,m-�:ENVIRONME:NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTAB'CLITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS mo
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTIJARIES/WETLANDS
RE'CR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITTCA�L WILDLIFE' HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /' STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
GRP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AKI 17
SOCKEYES SPAWN DOWNSTREAM
YES
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
POT. HUGE AVALANCHE
NOTE A (1 5 )
INTO RESV. /FERC DATA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALA SKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
14UNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTWR DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
(~OUNTY: CORDOVA--MC:C:ARTHY
- REGION K
SITE RANKING NG INFORMATION
TIEKEL RIVER
61. 14.7 /144 57.6
TIEKEL RIVER
TIEKEL
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
Ti INDEPENDENT
AK6NPAO060
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF S )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH)
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($ 1000 )
I LAVES TMENT, 'f RANSM I SS ION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OI ITPUT ($/MWH/YR )
I NVE STMENT i CAPAC T TY ($ / KW )
AV COST OF ENER13Y ($/MWH)
DENFFI T /COST R'A'r I Ci (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI ?S
PROD STATUS:
FACTORS
S?9
030
2000
105000
0
0.54
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
ENV (P£tI MENTAL I O I r�L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAP
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA'r RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
F'EDERALiSTATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO
NO
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (34) PRESENTLY UNDER STUDY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY —
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROJ UEP/INCFP
NHS I,D
COUNTYi CORDOVA—MCCARTHY
TSINA
REG T ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
TSINA
PTARMIGAN
UNDEVELOPED / RE SERVaO I R ( MOTH' F I ED )
HYDROELECTRIC
1; INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS:
AK6NPA0064
****E'NOINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT?
FLOW AV A14NUAL (CFS x
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (Kw)
ENERGY PRODUCT T ON —ANNUAL (MiWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I LAVES TMIEN'T , STRUCTURE&OEN ($ i 000 )
I NVESTMiENI" , TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MiWH:'YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (!►/KW )
AV COST OF FNEROY ($/MWH)
CENEFIT/COST.RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 73
**�*#�*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./ STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
FACTORS
359
304
12000
55000
0
0.55
SO
PRIORITY: HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
SOURCES NHS. .)SOS/AEA MAPS
C-011MENTSx NOTE A (19) CURRENTLY UNDER STUDY
J Air`, I 20
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RFGTON X
PNW SMALL 'SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: CORDOVA—MCCARTHY PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY COR
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDE'P I INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0062
VAN CLEVE
UNNAMED
i1OVA
UNDEVELOPED24.9
/ RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSc IDENTIFIED SITE
:k**K*ENG I VEER I NO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 474
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 131
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWW) 10000
POWER `TOR/AV FLOW : RATTO p.
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STR� CT� RE&DEN ($i000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($10O0)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY DU`I'PUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY T`,r ($/t�� W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/LOST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS. H10H GLACIER SILTATION
INTO RESERVOIR. AHRI 78
***#*ENV'IRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEINTEREST
NO
IN COPPER R DELTA NAT. WILDLIFE REFUGE
Si.) RCE`S
COMMENTS:
NHIS. USOS/APA MAPS. Pi_ 96 -4S7
NOTE A(Ie,)
VAN CLEVE
UNNAMED
i1OVA
UNDEVELOPED24.9
/ RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSc IDENTIFIED SITE
:k**K*ENG I VEER I NO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 474
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 131
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWW) 10000
POWER `TOR/AV FLOW : RATTO p.
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STR� CT� RE&DEN ($i000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($10O0)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY DU`I'PUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY T`,r ($/t�� W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/LOST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS. H10H GLACIER SILTATION
INTO RESERVOIR. AHRI 78
***#*ENV'IRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEINTEREST
NO
IN COPPER R DELTA NAT. WILDLIFE REFUGE
Si.) RCE`S
COMMENTS:
NHIS. USOS/APA MAPS. Pi_ 96 -4S7
NOTE A(Ie,)
INTO RESERVOIR. AHRI 78
***#*ENV'IRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEINTEREST
NO
IN COPPER R DELTA NAT. WILDLIFE REFUGE
Si.) RCE`S
COMMENTS:
NHIS. USOS/APA MAPS. Pi_ 96 -4S7
NOTE A(Ie,)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - IEGION X
PNW SMALL L SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANK I NO INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE. ALASKA
COUNTY r C:ORDOVA--MCCHRTHY
PROJECT NAME
WHITE RIVER
PRIORITY; HIGH
WHITE RIVER
YAKATAC�r�
04.8 ! 14 09.9
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 281
PLOW AV ANNUAL (C:F3) 290
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (w' W) 2172
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 15791
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.32
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVE3TMENT , STRUC:TURE GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSMI S3I ON ( � 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY � FUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 O0 )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
*1***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACC:EPTADILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS No
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERTES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER MAT RE3 AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT P ROXON
ENVIR GRP ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
NO APPARFNT OPPOSITION
NHS U3G3/APA MAPS
NOTE A (29 )
:Y.4K1 21
*1***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACC:EPTADILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS No
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERTES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER MAT RE3 AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT P ROXON
ENVIR GRP ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
NO APPARFNT OPPOSITION
NHS U3G3/APA MAPS
NOTE A (29 )
:Y.4K1 21
. S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKAf COUNTY: PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
L.AT/LONG
STREAK NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC -
PROD DEPiINDEP I. INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK4NPA4004
SLIM
r94 47.0 / 1 t; 17. 0
F'E'�'I �RSON CREEK
ELxM
�.lNt EVELOFED ! RUN OF RIVER
PROD STATUS: s IDENTIFIED SITE
*****EN OINE'.ERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 200
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 20
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (VW) 125
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 328
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO) p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.3
EOU I PMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURF&GEN ($1 DO0 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT T (t>/MWHIYR )
II' VE STMENT/CAPAC:ITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 G0 )
COMMENTS: 1979 PEAK DEMAND 13?KW
*NUMENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENTC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC.R LAMES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE H► B
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED{
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC:TES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP' ATT FRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
FAVORABLE — EXPECTED AREA DrVELOPMENT
NEW LOAD INCLUDE SCHOOL/HOMES — ADDING 53KW
* .AK1 22
SLIM
r94 47.0 / 1 t; 17. 0
F'E'�'I �RSON CREEK
ELxM
�.lNt EVELOFED ! RUN OF RIVER
PROD STATUS: s IDENTIFIED SITE
*****EN OINE'.ERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 200
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 20
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (VW) 125
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 328
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO) p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.3
EOU I PMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURF&GEN ($1 DO0 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT T (t>/MWHIYR )
II' VE STMENT/CAPAC:ITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 G0 )
COMMENTS: 1979 PEAK DEMAND 13?KW
*NUMENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENTC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC.R LAMES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE H► B
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED{
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC:TES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP' ATT FRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
FAVORABLE — EXPECTED AREA DrVELOPMENT
NEW LOAD INCLUDE SCHOOL/HOMES — ADDING 53KW
* .AK1 22
*NUMENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENTC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC.R LAMES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE H► B
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED{
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC:TES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP' ATT FRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
FAVORABLE — EXPECTED AREA DrVELOPMENT
NEW LOAD INCLUDE SCHOOL/HOMES — ADDING 53KW
* .AK1 22
{ AK1 23
U.3. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROU DEP! I NDE'P
NHS ID #
COUNTY: FA I RBANKS
- REG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
CHENA RIVER /�
64 54.0 / 146 22.0
CNENA RIVER
PLEASANT VALLEY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK6NPAD06;
Kp***:ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I E+NVES TMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY 01.)TPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS. AHRI iG USGS
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE'
FACTORS
106
905
10000
46000
0
0.52
K*** ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
SOCIAL A14D ENV I RON . IMPACTS POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTSs
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A().S)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATEa AL.ASKA COUNTY: FAIRBANKS PRIORITYi MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT /LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
PROJ DEP / I NDEP
NHS ID #
L I VENGOOD DAM
65 35.5 /148 23.4
SOUTH FORK HESS CREEK
TANANA
EXISTING / RESERVOIR
WATER SUPPLY/OTHER
AKC:NPA0070
**- * V-*ENG I VEER I NiG / ECONOMIC:
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
E14ER GY PRCDI.JC T I ON --ANNUAL (MWH )
POWRR STOR/AV FLOW -RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVE rTMENT » 'STRUC'Tf IRE&UEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1400)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT'$/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT /CAPAC I TY ($ /IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
%E:NEF I T /COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS:
PROD STATUS;
FACTORS
41
18
210
A-94
0
0.26
***ENVIRONMENTAL/'.SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL W I LDI— I FE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FAC'r0R,S
FEDERAL/:STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PLIB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
,SOURCED:
COMMENTS:
NHS
LIMITED DATA
mK 1 24
0
_ Air,' 1 23
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/2 /81
STA'f E t ALASKA COUNTY: FA I RDANK S S . E . PR I CAR i TY ; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
GOO
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
**K**ENO T NEER I NC / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 16FJ
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 497
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 13000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 5625,�
"; POWER TOR /AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
E'P t T PME� �T SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.:-'TRUCTURE&GCN ($1000)
1 NVE STMENT . TRANS M I SSI ON (* 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT i$/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI iG i SGS
****->ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I L.D / SCEN I C
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OCHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT MAJOR OPPOSITION
DPASTER
30.0
�OOI]PASTER RIVER
UNDEVELOPED f RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A 1 19 )
****->ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I L.D / SCEN I C
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OCHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT MAJOR OPPOSITION
DPASTER
30.0
�OOI]PASTER RIVER
UNDEVELOPED f RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A 1 19 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGTON X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: AL.ASKA COUNTY: FAIRBANKS S.E. PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
ROCK
LADE
PTARI%AN CREED
{:� 1 57.0 / 1 1 19.9
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
FROM STATUS% IDENTIFIED SITE
***- *EIVG I NEED I NG / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 513
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 193
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 12000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 55000
ROWER STOR/AY FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTORACFACTOR0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION L14I TS
I NVESTME14T . STRUC:TURE&GE�N ($1000 )
I NVE STMENT , TRAN �M I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT / C APAC. T T's ($ / KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
)BENEFIT/C O: ST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
0. *��**ENV I RONMENTAL/ S OC:I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS.
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHE'RTES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL F'AC"TORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS%
NO
IN WRANGELL—ST. ELIAS NATIONAL PRESERVE
NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS. US aS/APA MAPS. PL 96--487
NOTE A(4S)
i
AK 1 26
0. *��**ENV I RONMENTAL/ S OC:I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS.
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHE'RTES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL F'AC"TORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS%
NO
IN WRANGELL—ST. ELIAS NATIONAL PRESERVE
NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS. US aS/APA MAPS. PL 96--487
NOTE A(4S)
i
AK 1 26
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY _ REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATES ALASKA►
COUNTY: FA I RBANKS S.E.
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LOMG
STREAM NAME S ALCHA RIVER
MUNICIPALITY CAR I B
RESOURCE. TYPE
OWNER
ELE(: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP'/INUEP` I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK6NFA0364
SALGHA RIVER
GC
UNDEVELOPED26.9
! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRIORITY: HIGH
PRO.. STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 135
FLOW AU ANNUAL (CFS) 1600
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2�;000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 123000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL P1. ANT FACTOR 0. 56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT STR� 1CTURE&EVEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT , RA,N SM I SS I CAN (11000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO ix 100 )
COMMENTS: ►SrHR I ?S U SGS
E*ONAENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/ WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLYTIGAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIESAGENCIESLOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS, USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(20
SALGHA RIVER
GC
UNDEVELOPED26.9
! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRIORITY: HIGH
PRO.. STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 135
FLOW AU ANNUAL (CFS) 1600
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2�;000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 123000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL P1. ANT FACTOR 0. 56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT STR� 1CTURE&EVEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT , RA,N SM I SS I CAN (11000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO ix 100 )
COMMENTS: ►SrHR I ?S U SGS
E*ONAENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/ WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLYTIGAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIESAGENCIESLOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS, USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(20
E*ONAENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/ WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLYTIGAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIESAGENCIESLOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS, USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(20
Page 1-28 Missing
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA KA COUNTY: PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAEME;
GRAYLING
05.0
UNDEVELOPED ! RUN OF RIVER
PR►J STATUS a IDENTIFIED SITE
*�***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAR (FT) 50
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 75
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (IOW) 2:30
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (Mill-1) 604
POWER GTOR/AV FLOW -RATIO a
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.3
EQUIPMENT :'ELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCT�ARE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT,"rRANGMIG ION ($1000)
INYEESTMENT/ENERGY GI„iTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (IN/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWII)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 00 )
COMMENTS: 1979 PEAK LOAD 74KW
��"ir-ENVIROMMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLAND
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERYOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HAE3TTAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR
FEDERAL/STATE/STATE AOENCIES
LOCAL. PUR ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GR`� ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL t� RP ATT PRO / G�:►N
UTILITY INTEREST
GRAYLING
COAL DEPOSITS. WINED POTENTIAL FOR DEV.
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEEC. USOS/APA MAPS:
��"ir-ENVIROMMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLAND
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERYOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HAE3TTAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR
FEDERAL/STATE/STATE AOENCIES
LOCAL. PUR ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GR`� ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL t� RP ATT PRO / G�:►N
UTILITY INTEREST
GRAYLING
COAL DEPOSITS. WINED POTENTIAL FOR DEV.
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEEC. USOS/APA MAPS:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REG T ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: HAINES DIV.
PROJECT NAME
CH T t_KOO
T
VER
CFI .0 Li~4GTT
UNDEVELOPED32.0
f RESERVG I R t MOD I F I E0
PRIORITY: HIGH
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 135
FLOW AV ANNUAL.. (CFS) 1076
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 16000
ENERGY Y PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 7SOOC�
POWEh STOR/AV FLOW !RATIO 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVEST'MFNT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION t $1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT &/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ( $/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ f MWH )
BENEFIT; COS:<T RATIO (X 1 UG )
COMMENTS: AHEM 78
wAww*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED D SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL TT I C'AL, FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSM
NO APPARENT MAJOR OPPOSITION
NHS. US3S/APA MAPS
NOTE A (31)
�` Arl. 1 so y
wAww*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED D SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL TT I C'AL, FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSM
NO APPARENT MAJOR OPPOSITION
NHS. US3S/APA MAPS
NOTE A (31)
�` Arl. 1 so y
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RE01ON X
PNW SMALL- SCALE- HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTS'G JUNEAU PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
BEAR CREEKCREEKLAT/LONG
58
STREAM NAME
FEAR CREEK
.�UNEAU
;.' ! t 34 OC). 0
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSe IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 849
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 25
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 18000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL, (MWH) .4000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G
ANNUAL.. PLANT FACTOR 0.27
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UN'r TS
I NVE'STMENT, S TRUCTURE&GEN ($1 CC�O )
TNVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT O�/MWH/YR )
I NOES TMENT /CAF� AC I TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERC3Y ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 7e USOS
*�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RESERVOIF�(��,
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMEN`�'S t
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(57)
. AK1 31 `
*�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RESERVOIF�(��,
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMEN`�'S t
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(57)
. AK1 31 `
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: JUNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
BOUNDARY LAKELAT
/ LONG
STREAM NAME
BOUNDARY CREEK
40.0
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO! STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*�'.sENG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 794
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 235
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 20000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 95000
POWER STOR/AV Fl-f-'']W RA,rio 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUXPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUC:TUPE&GEN � $1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRAM SM I SS I ON ($100 )
INVESTMFNT/ENERGY OIJTPUT ($!MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFI-r/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
poi:* ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC:E'NIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL„ GRP ATT FRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
IF USED RESERVOIR WOULD BE TN CANADA
SOURO'E'y
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (66 )
poi:* ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC:E'NIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL„ GRP ATT FRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
IF USED RESERVOIR WOULD BE TN CANADA
SOURO'E'y
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (66 )
U. S. PEFA#`•:`f MENT OF ENERGY — REr:IClN X
PNW S11ALI— SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE e ALASKA COUNTY a JUNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
COWEE CRECREEKLAT:$LONG
STREAM NAME
COWEE CREEK
'IC..�9i a ! 1 S4' 54.2
DATS�iN L.ANi I rd0
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET BOWER HEAD (FT) 480
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 44
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 6000
ENERGY F' RO€�UCT I ON—Ai�NUAL (MWH) 25560
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.4.8
EQUIPMENT SEL.EcTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSMI SSION ($1000 )
INVi~ STMEIAT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY -INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($iKW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
GE€'�tt FIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTSi AHRI 78
0x*��1 IVVIFkC.NMENTAL/SOC lAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
E NV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NIAS. USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (57 )
Ate 1 S•S 1
0x*��1 IVVIFkC.NMENTAL/SOC lAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
E NV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NIAS. USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (57 )
Ate 1 S•S 1
k T`` +sky 1 34
0
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNN SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE R4NK I NC INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY-. ,JUNEAU
PROJECT NAME
CRATER LAKE
LAT/LONG
58
STREAM !NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
EL.EC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC:
PRO,J DEP/INDEP
G: DEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NP'AOS5�.�
OAS. / gS 425. 7
CRATER CREEK
SHETTIaHAM
PRIORITYm HIGH
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****,ENGINEERINO / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
979
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
185
C:APAC:ITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
11.572
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
41490
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
%
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.39
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITE:
I NVESTMENT, STF` UC:TURE&DEN
($1, ��OO )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($IC?GO)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($►/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
I NTERT I E W #LONE+
LAKE TO SHETT I SHAM PRO,J.
�*�i*OE4VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
NO
FSTUAR I ES/WETLANDS
NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
NO
CUT RESOURCE SITES
-
NO
CRIlICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
NO
FISHERIES HABITAT
NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
NC,
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB o%TT PRO/CONENVIR
GRP ATT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GFOP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
AHR I "7S
SOURCES NHS. I 1 GS / APA MAPS
COMMENTS.- NOTE A (40) AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE % ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
;STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNED
ELEC': UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDFP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: JLJ14EAU
PRIORITYa HIGH
DAB! I DS014 CREEK
58 21.3 / 133 44.5
DAVIDSON CREEK
TAKU LODGE
IA,LDEVFLOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MaDIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I; INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
AK7NPA2607
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POKER HEAD
(FT)
89
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
247
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
27S6
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
119836
POWER STOR/AV FLOW 2RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
4.99
EQUIPMENT SELEC-TIO-W
UNTTS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEIV
($1000 )
I NVE.STMENT , TRANSM I SCE I ON
($1000 )
7NYE:-TMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT(*/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/VW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
IMPRACTICAL TO
REGULATE SMALL,,. FOREBAY ONLY. AHRI78
�*"-#*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFLICTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/COLA
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL_ GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS. USDA/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (176)
AL�'1.
AK 1 '36
*1
U . S { DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA KA COUNTY: JUNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
DAV I ES CREEKLAT/LONE*
58
STREAM NAME
Dav I ES CREEKCREEKMUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UT I L. I TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO_t PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP
I; INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
A;,7NPA2608
. 4 / t4 54.2
DAT ON LA ND I N0
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUE: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
((FT)
305
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
102
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
5004
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
2538�.�
POWER STEER/AV FLOW :RATIO
p
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR
0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVESTME:NT , s' I'R4JC"l'URE8ZEN
($1 GOO )
INVESTMENT, TRANS MISSION
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT(/MWH/YR}
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
Ali COST OF ENERGY
($/I~NWH )
BENEFIT/CO`T RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHR I 78
��*��•ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC. NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS. US OS / APA, MAPS
COMMENTS t NOTE A 0 6 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COL INTY z JUNEAU
PROJECT NAME
LAT/L Of4G
STREAM NAME ENDICOl'T RIUERIVERMUNIC TPALITY HAYNFS
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO, PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I. INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK6NPA00
F'NDICOTT LtiiVEF;
27.9
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS:
•y*** ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 482
FLOW AV ANNUAL (OFS) G?G
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) I05000
POWER :wTOR/AV FLOW %RATIO U
ANNUAK PLANT FACTOR 4.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTMENT. STRk. CTURE& Elul ($1000 )
INVESTMENT : TRAN -�M 18S I ON (11000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVEnTME'NT/C:APAC:IT`r ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY V$/MWH?
BENEFIT/COT RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 73
PRIOPITYi HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
1*5* *EN�'rt�CONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO-
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ON
E.NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. U GS / APA MAPS
NOTE A t 25 i
F'NDICOTT LtiiVEF;
27.9
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS:
•y*** ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 482
FLOW AV ANNUAL (OFS) G?G
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) I05000
POWER :wTOR/AV FLOW %RATIO U
ANNUAK PLANT FACTOR 4.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTMENT. STRk. CTURE& Elul ($1000 )
INVESTMENT : TRAN -�M 18S I ON (11000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVEnTME'NT/C:APAC:IT`r ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY V$/MWH?
BENEFIT/COT RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 73
PRIOPITYi HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
1*5* *EN�'rt�CONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO-
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ON
E.NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. U GS / APA MAPS
NOTE A t 25 i
PRIOPITYi HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
1*5* *EN�'rt�CONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO-
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ON
E.NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. U GS / APA MAPS
NOTE A t 25 i
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I CAN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE i ALASI IA rOUNTY e JUNEAU PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME NU6r.32T C:REEV
LAT/LONG 58 25.0 /134 30.9
STREAM NAME NUGGET CREEK
MUNICIPALITY AI KE BAY
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRO J DE'P / I NDEP 1: INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID #I: AID?°9NPA0075
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
606
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
208
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
30000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
KNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&(BEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1000 )
I NVE STMEN ;'ENERrY OI JTPUT ($ / MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERi 9Y
($/MWH �
SENEF I T / COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTSs
AHRI 78.
EXISTING PROJECT
�i*o�*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOLIAi- ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE ' � I TFS
CRITICAL WILDLIFE FIAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES j
WATER QIJAL T TY I
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIEy i
LOCAL PUB ACTT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP AiT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS. USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS-. NOTE A(49) TYPE OF EXIST. PROJECT UNCLEAR
AK I 38
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: JUNE'AU
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
F'ETEP'SON LAKE
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP
Ix INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NPA0076
PRIORITY. H10H
PETEl�SON LAKE
44.0
SAINT THEFSESA
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(iyODIFIFD)
PROD STATI �S : I LENT I F I ED SITE:
* ***ENG I VEER l NG r' ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
669
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
23
CAPACITY. INSTALLED
(KW)
6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
26986
POWER STOR/AV FLOW sRATIO
€)
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0. 51
EQUIPMENT SEI. EC:T I ON
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&DEN
($1O(�D )
7 NVESTMENT , TRAN'W H I'ti S I ON
($1 t�OO )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OI iTPUT ($O"MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78
*r,EN%) I RC' NMENTAL / "c3OC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITE`
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAYS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDAFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
NHS. USGS/APA DAPS
NOTE A (52 )
AFC 1 40
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/31
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TAPE
OWNER
ELEC UT I L L TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/ I NDEP
NHS ID #
REO I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
COUNTYi ,.. UNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
RHINE CREED
58 13.4 / 1=-44 t0.8
RHINE CREEK
JUNEAU
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
T.. INDEPENDENT
AK7NPAOD77
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAT (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWEP STOR/AV FLOW-R,-�'rrc
.'ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION U14I TS
INVESTMENT . STFcUCTUR.E &GEN ($1000 )
INVEsTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/K W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ f MWH )
EENF;FIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
PROD STATUS:
FACTORS
389
29
1200
1570
0
0.14
IDENTIFIED SITE
��4-*-):;*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACT(;aRS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W 1 L.D /SCENIC- NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO!CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO / COI•
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A110)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELEC:TR I C RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
U4/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: JUNEAU PR I OR I TY i MEDIUM
PROUP'CT NAME
SHEEP
1 �.0 /iCs4 18.9
THANE
UNDEVELOPED / RESERYO I R ( NOD I F I E D)
PROD STATUS e IDENTIFIED SITE
*ENGINEERINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET FLOWER 14FAD (FT) 769
FLOW AV ANNUAL, (CFS) 51
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 26144
FLOWER STOR/AV FLOES :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
) NVE:S.TMENT , STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVE:STMENT , TRANSM I SS i ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O UTPI,.II' ($ /MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT,°CAPACC I TY ($ f Kw )
AV C,0ST OF F_NE'ROY ($ /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78 US GS
�:�:**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECCR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
F I SHEP I ES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES,
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL, GRP ATT PRO/CON
/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOI �RrES
COMMENTS:
AK1 41
NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
VALID MINING CLAIM CONTROL. SITE DISCOURAGE
NHS. IJS►:7S/APA MAPS
NOTE A(35)
�:�:**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECCR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
F I SHEP I ES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES,
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL, GRP ATT PRO/CON
/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOI �RrES
COMMENTS:
AK1 41
NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
VALID MINING CLAIM CONTROL. SITE DISCOURAGE
NHS. IJS►:7S/APA MAPS
NOTE A(35)
Aif,1 42
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
fi W SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA: KA COUNTY: UUNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SHE'RMAN CREEK
LAT/LONG
58
STREAM WAMIw
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 390
FLOW AV ANNUAL � CFS) Is
CAPAC: F TY „ 114S TALLE D (KW) 1200
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 4SSCr
POWER S'TTOR / AV FLOW :RATIO Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.46
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
IINIVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GE:N 4 :i 000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSMI SS:I ON ($1000
INVESTMENT/FNERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (*/KW)
AV COST 4F ENERGY ( /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
*�->**EI�i�, IRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC•R LAKES /RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT f�'RO/COIV
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
*�->**EI�i�, IRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC•R LAKES /RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT f�'RO/COIV
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SHERF'IAN
C�REEI�
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(25)
'AK 1 4
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: JUNEAU
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STRFAM NAME
SWEETHEART
SWEETHEART Fi`,LLS
1-48.1
SHE"L"T I SMAM
WEETHEAPiT CREED
PRIORITY: HIGH
�.31VGIW�JP L�.il'ELJ / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO,J STATUSz IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 611
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF a) 328
CAPACITY, I MSTALL ED (KW) 29000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 127000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0ANNUAL.. PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVFSTMENT-STRUCTIJRE&OF14 (:a1000)
I NVI� STMENT, TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / F W )
AV COST OF E14ERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 CCU )
COMMENTS; MAY DEVELOP WITH AK7NP'A0143
*a**�*ENVIRaIMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
14HS. USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (1 to i )
*a**�*ENVIRaIMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
14HS. USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (1 to i )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RE0ION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RAt',IK I NG INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: JUNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAMi=
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
tiHFTTIS
HAM
UPPER GWEETHEART
30.6
SWEETHEART CRI~EK
UNDEVELOPED / RE: S WITH D T VERB I ON ( MOD I F I EO )
1=ROJ STATUSs IDENTIFIED SITE
M****ENGINEE.RINC / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1175
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 45
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 7000
ENERGY PRODUCT T ON --_ANNUAL (MWH) .: 0660
POWER TOR/AV FLOW 9RATIO Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRU�C:TUREt:GEN ($1000 )
IN'VESTN NT,TRAN�"MTOSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/ WiWH/YR )
INVE ,rMENT/ CAPA,�:ITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ /MWH )
DENEFI T/COCT RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS-. PROJECT IS ALTERNATIVE TO NUMBER NPA0083
**mE:NVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD.,SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RFCR LAKES/RESERVOIRS NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAFT NO
FISHERIES HABITAT NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAI.. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIEr�
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS. !.)SGS/APA MAPS
COMMENT; a NOTE A (9O) MAY DEVELOP WITH NPA0083
1
AK 1 44
**mE:NVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD.,SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RFCR LAKES/RESERVOIRS NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAFT NO
FISHERIES HABITAT NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAI.. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIEr�
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS. !.)SGS/APA MAPS
COMMENT; a NOTE A (9O) MAY DEVELOP WITH NPA0083
1
AK 1 44
SOURCES NHS. !.)SGS/APA MAPS
COMMENT; a NOTE A (9O) MAY DEVELOP WITH NPA0083
1
AK 1 44
Aktii 45
0
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: JUNEAU PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME TEASE CREEK
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELE'C UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PPOJ PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRO�J DE'�P/INDEP Is INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0084
TEASE
/ 1 40.2
SH�'TT I SM-iAM
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**%*ENGFVEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1033
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 152
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 16000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH ) 70000
POWER STOR / A V FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INYESTMENT.:WTRUCTURE&CEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
DENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: FPC SE Ate WATERPOWER REPORT 1947
***OENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO / C ('jt4
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
C:OMME�N7 S :
NHS. USGS/APA MAP,
NOTE A(86)
TEASE
/ 1 40.2
SH�'TT I SM-iAM
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**%*ENGFVEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1033
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 152
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 16000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH ) 70000
POWER STOR / A V FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INYESTMENT.:WTRUCTURE&CEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
DENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: FPC SE Ate WATERPOWER REPORT 1947
***OENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO / C ('jt4
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
C:OMME�N7 S :
NHS. USGS/APA MAP,
NOTE A(86)
***OENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO / C ('jt4
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
C:OMME�N7 S :
NHS. USGS/APA MAP,
NOTE A(86)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE t ALASKA
COUNTY: JUNEAU
PROJECT NAME
LAT/DING
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPA-LITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEiC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP / T NUEP'
I t INDEPENDENT
NHS ID 0
AKMNPA0086
TREA1WELl. /TgE+I�T�rH
TREAT;WELL i'ITCH
I~+OUGLAS
EXISTING WITH RETIRED POWER PLANT
AID ELEC. LIGHT & POWER
PRIORITY#" HIGH
/ RUN OF RIVEN
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
517
FLOW AV ANNUAL.
(CFS)
75
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
2500
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON-AMNUAL
(MWH)
10000
POWER STGR/ AV FLOW :RATIO
O.
ANNUAL.. PLANT FACTOR
.46
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UN I'rs
i
INVESTMENT , TR'UCTURE&GEN
($1000)
2906
I NVE'STMENT, TRANSM I SS I ON
($1000)
40
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OU'TPI_IT (t /MWH/ ir'R)
295
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
1178
AV COST SEE ENERGY
($/ MWH)
26
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
SS
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78 DIVERSION
FROM 6 CREEKS
Ni***�*EN�IIRONMENTAL./SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA B
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
S
WATER OUALTTY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL FULL ATT FRO/CON
E'NVIR GRP ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
YES
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS {
I
€�K I 46
1-DITAK.1 47
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/01
STATE G ALASKA
COUNTY: JUNEAU
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
58
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
TAiI<L�.� LODGE
PRIORITY: HIGH
TURNERR L..AKE
15.7 /1SS 57.3
TURNER (::REELS;
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION ( MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS. IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERINf� I ECONOMIC FACTORS
MET POWER HEAD (FT) 1G4
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 497
CAPACITY, INSTALk, ED (LAW) 5000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 21900
POWER STOR/ A�� FLOW : RAT I G 0
ANMUAL PLANTANT FACTi �R G. 5
EQUIPMENT SELECT I CAN UNITS
INVEMTMENT.ST�",UCTURE GEN ($i000)
INVESTMENT , TRANSM I SS I Off! (i 1 000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPAC:I TY 0/ kW )
AV CAST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT / COST RATIO (X 1 OQ )
COMMENTS: AHR 7S
Ao**-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NCB
POTENTIAL_ WILD/SCENIC: NO
F STUAR I L= S / WETLAND
REC:R LAKESIRE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TE:S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POKITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCALL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/ C::ON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONN
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (20 )
Ao**-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NCB
POTENTIAL_ WILD/SCENIC: NO
F STUAR I L= S / WETLAND
REC:R LAKESIRE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TE:S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POKITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCALL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/ C::ON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONN
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (20 )
UDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY —" REG T ON X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDPOELECTRIC RESOURCE AND sim riANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: JUNEAU PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
58
STREAM NAME
UNNAMED
UNNAMED LADE NEAR LACE RIVER
P14 4.9
COMET
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATES: IDENTIFIED SITE
','*'�3**ENG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 299
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF S) 28
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (KW) 10000
ENERGY PRC)i�(,CTTON—�AN14UAL. (NWH) �.SOGO
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G.
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQU I PMEN"I' S EL EC:T I Card UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTLIRE'&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT . TRAN SM I S S I ON ($1 i)4O )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OI.ITF'IJT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ /MWH k
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS. AHRI 78
M **}*#*ENV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDPOL I T I C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL /S"I"ATE AGENCIES
LOCAL RUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVI R GRP ATT PRO/CON
�N
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
C
OMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSTION
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS l
NOTE A(76. 1
I
I
D
- Af i '4''
R '
M **}*#*ENV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDPOL I T I C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL /S"I"ATE AGENCIES
LOCAL RUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVI R GRP ATT PRO/CON
�N
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
C
OMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSTION
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS l
NOTE A(76. 1
I
I
D
- Af i '4''
R '
AK 1 49
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL, SCAL. E HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY; JUNEAU PRIORITY, MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
YEHRING CREEK
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
YEHR I NO CREEK
EE!
58 7pCi /1Sa 45.9
TAk:L) LODGE
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS. IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1029
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 155
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 5000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 26000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW.. -RATIO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR OR 0.59
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVEST�#FNT . STRlJCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVE; �TMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
:�".ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENT I Al.. WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOTRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRTTICA,L. WILDLIFE HA,D
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL- FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOS T T I ON
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. I JSGSIA,PA MAPS
NOTE A(35) MAY DE IN GLACIER NAT. MONUMENT
:�".ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENT I Al.. WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOTRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRTTICA,L. WILDLIFE HA,D
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL- FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOS T T I ON
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. I JSGSIA,PA MAPS
NOTE A(35) MAY DE IN GLACIER NAT. MONUMENT
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04>26/51
STATE-. ALASKA COLINTY a KALTAG PRIORITY: MEDIUM �
PROJECT NAME
LAT/Li�NG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
I: ALTA+w�
i�A�� LTyA+�
y{{�� / {{ f
UNNAMED MI, WEST OF VILLA>«E
UNDEVELOPED/ RUN OF RIVER
ALASKA VILLAGE ELEC: COOP
P'ROJ STATUSo IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING o ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER MEAD (FT) 100
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (C:FS) 5
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 155
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) �407
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
;ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0 r: 9
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVE STME.NT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($ 1000 )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMIS:SIC'+I�i ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,"ENERGY OIJTPUT ($/MWH/YFo
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS; 1979 PEAK LOAD 107KW
*�AgENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTIJAR I ES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHFR NAT RES AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO / C:�: N
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ACTT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS;
BEAVER. BROAD VALLEYS
HATED IN 'BEST SITES' CATEGORY BY AVEC
AVEC US08/AP'A MAPS
YEAR ROUND STREAM
*�AgENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTIJAR I ES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHFR NAT RES AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO / C:�: N
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ACTT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS;
BEAVER. BROAD VALLEYS
HATED IN 'BEST SITES' CATEGORY BY AVEC
AVEC US08/AP'A MAPS
YEAR ROUND STREAM
0 W'N
Aid1 51
U,S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: K I ANA PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
K
A
pia
,�Ii�l�59.0 {{ , / �j �l
i/ 1 «I M 0
�` :� ANA
UNDEVELOPED ! RUN OF RIVER
ALAS A VILLAGE ELEC COOP
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEEDINC+ / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 150
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 50
CAPACITY, T NSTAL LE D (14;W) 460
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 1208
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.3
EQUIPMENT SE.L ECT I �. N UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUrW TURE&GEN ($ i.000 )
INVESTMENT , TRANSM I SS I SIN ($1 CJ00 )
INVESTMENT -'ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWli/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/a`W )
AV COST OF ENERGY` ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTSx 1' 79 PEAK LOAD 170KW
*W*vENVIRONMlENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR
FEDERAL/STA,7'E AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
RATED IN "BEST SITES" CATEGORY BY AVEC
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEC USGS/APA MAPS
WINTER FLOW QUESTION. SUG. WINTER STORAGE
*W*vENVIRONMlENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR
FEDERAL/STA,7'E AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
RATED IN "BEST SITES" CATEGORY BY AVEC
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEC USGS/APA MAPS
WINTER FLOW QUESTION. SUG. WINTER STORAGE
U. . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REO I CIN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA" KA COUNTY c K NA I —COOK INLET PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
CHII
ITNA
){�"ii
'w ! .l. d 19.9
CH�JITI�IA RIVER
TYC►NEt�
UNDEVELOP'I ► / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATLJS : IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD ((FT)'551
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 193
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 000
E,NEROY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (;lWH) 45000
POWER STOR/A`� FLOW a RATIO O
A14NUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTMCNT . STRU►�TURF&► �E'N ($1000 )
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS:
***ENV I RONMENTAL/ �- OC' I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
-WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL P`LIS ATT PRE►/C.C"IN
1=NVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GR`P ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
POSE I BL.E
POSSIBLE
I
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (48). POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
l
' AID 1 52
***ENV I RONMENTAL/ �- OC' I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
-WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL P`LIS ATT PRE►/C.C"IN
1=NVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GR`P ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
POSE I BL.E
POSSIBLE
I
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (48). POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
l
' AID 1 52
77
r
+..r. Aid 1 53
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATES ALASKA COUNTYo KENAI COOK INLET PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
FOX
� 58.4 / 1 a 3 48.0
FOX RIVER
CLAM GULCH
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
* �*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 299
FLOW AV A14NUAL (C.:FS) 545
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 25000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWM (F 108851
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATICI 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SFL.ECT i at4 UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUC:TURE&DEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMIT SIGN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS:
�*m** :ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILL{/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL, WILDLIFE HALE
F I xHE.R I ES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO %CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
LOC . IN KENA I NAT . MOOSE RANGE
LOCATED ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SOURCES
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(17)
�*m** :ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILL{/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL, WILDLIFE HALE
F I xHE.R I ES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO %CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
LOC . IN KENA I NAT . MOOSE RANGE
LOCATED ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SOURCES
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(17)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RE0I:0N X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA SKA COUNTY s KENA I COOED INLET PR I Oil I TY ; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
f:LLEYRIVER
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
: **** E= NG I NEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 358
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 524
C:APAC: I TY r INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 10000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQU T PMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN (�+1000 )
T NVE STMENT , TRANSM I �+S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENEF�6Y OUTPUT ($/MWH.'YR )
:INVESTMENT/CAPACYTY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/C=�'IS RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTSe
****#ENV I RONME�NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL EAU} ATT PRO/CON
F.,NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK' l �4
NO
IN KENA I NATIONAL MOOSE RANGE
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(19)
****#ENV I RONME�NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL. WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL EAU} ATT PRO/CON
F.,NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK' l �4
NO
IN KENA I NATIONAL MOOSE RANGE
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(19)
}t �
AK 1 55
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REOION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04126/81
STATE.- ALASKA COUNTY: KENAI COOK INLET PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
MCNE I L RIVER
LATf LONG
STREAM NAME
MCNE I L
RIVER
k`
UNDEVELOPED10.0
RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSe IDENTIFIED SITE
*i* *�**ENGYNEERINO / ECONOMIC FACT ORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) lit
FLOW AV ANNUAL_ (CFS) 2$$
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) 000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) P.000
POWER S TOR/ Aid FLOW : RAT I c.t 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.45
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY CAI �TPUT (�/MWH/VR )
INVESTMENT/�.APACI-r ( 1IOW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS.
*�-�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CUI,T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I C:AL FACTORS
FEDU'RAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
ORP ATT PRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
NO
IN MCNEIL STATE GAME SANCTUARY
SOURCES
NHS LISGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (1 O )
*�-�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CUI,T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I C:AL FACTORS
FEDU'RAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
ORP ATT PRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
NO
IN MCNEIL STATE GAME SANCTUARY
SOURCES
NHS LISGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (1 O )
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGIO!N X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04,'26/S1
STATER ALA SKA
COUNT`{ KENA I •-COOK INLET
PROJECT NAME
PAINT RIVER
LA'S' ! L..ONC
59
STREAM NAME
PRIORITY. HIGH
FAINT RIVER
HC�P`#Ak::
1C�. diet
d RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAL) (FT) 115
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 511
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION" -ANNUAL (MWH) 28000
POWER S"rGR/AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&OEN ($1400 )
I NVESTME'NT r TRAN zM I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJ'IPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPAC:ITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS:
**"*ENVIRONME:NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIR.�
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAYS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
CNVIR ORP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONSOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSo
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(SS)
AK 1 56 '
**"*ENVIRONME:NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIR.�
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAYS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
CNVIR ORP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONSOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSo
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(SS)
AK 1 56 '
U. S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REO ION )(
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KENAI--COOK INLET PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SHEEP CREEK ILAT
/L..ONO
STREAM NAME
SHEEP CREEK
REE�.'.
+ 4ea. ` / 1 Q 45.9
HOMER
UNDEVELOPED ! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 3191
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 635
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 20000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWF L) 94000
POWER aTOR/ AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0,53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVE:STMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1OOC+)
I NVESTMEN'r, TFANSM I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($!MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPAC:ITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 OO )
C OMME.NT S :
*�*ENVIRONMENTAL/8OCI�,L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILL'!/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RL~ S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIF_S
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV IR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO
IN KENA I NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(9)
AK 1 57
y:. `u`•'
*�*ENVIRONMENTAL/8OCI�,L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILL'!/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RL~ S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIF_S
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV IR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO
IN KENA I NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(9)
AK 1 57
y:. `u`•'
A
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGTON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: KENAI--COOK INLET
PROJECT NAME
TI_iSTUMEN
PRIORITY: LOW
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE:
*****ENGINEERING ! ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD ( FT) 1098
FLOW AV :ANNUAL (CFS) 184
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 102000
POWER STOR/Ak! FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT , -rRANS M I SS I CAN (1 1 GC)O )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS:
* ***E NV ,I, RONMENTAL / SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILL/ SC':ENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR E_AKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRIT'LiC:AL. WILDLIFE HAF
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE TATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
E14V I R GRP ATT PRn / CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
NO
IN KENA, I NATIONAL MOOSE RANGE
A
S�'�LLtNE�TA
33.9
TR)STUI"IENA G9_ACTER
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMME14TS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A � 91)
* ***E NV ,I, RONMENTAL / SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILL/ SC':ENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR E_AKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRIT'LiC:AL. WILDLIFE HAF
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE TATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
E14V I R GRP ATT PRn / CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
NO
IN KENA, I NATIONAL MOOSE RANGE
A
S�'�LLtNE�TA
33.9
TR)STUI"IENA G9_ACTER
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMME14TS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A � 91)
AID 1 '5
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL ;SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA C:OIA!TY: KETCHIKAN PRIORITY, MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
WH T TMAN LAKELAT
/LONE
STREAM NAME
CASE CREEK
UNDEVELOPED / 32.3
RES WITH D T VERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: TDENTIFIED SITE
-:*****ENGINEERINO / ECONOMIC- FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (F'i) 379
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 45
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) 2500
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 115$6
POWER STOP;/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR t �, 5i
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUC.TI tP'E�.OEN ($1000 )
:INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY :$/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RA'iio (X 100)
COMMENT S s AHR I 78
**NPENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL T T I CAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUS ATT PRO/CONENV I R ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
EXISTING PROJECT DETERS DEVELOPMENT
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
MOTE A (5 l) TYPE OF EXIST. PROJECT UNCLEAR
**NPENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL T T I CAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUS ATT PRO/CONENV I R ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
EXISTING PROJECT DETERS DEVELOPMENT
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
MOTE A (5 l) TYPE OF EXIST. PROJECT UNCLEAR
Ism -
',�- AK 1 60
01:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION %
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/G1
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY i KETCHI KAN
PROJECT NAME
SWAN LAKE
LAT/LONG
55
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
CORING
Ste." /i':{1 21.0
FALLS CRr REV I LLAO I GED I ISLAND
PRIORITY: HIGH
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH D T VERB I ON ( MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 274
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 464
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 22000
ENF_.ROY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 85000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW-.RATtr'i 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.44
EQUIPMENT SELECTION L.itlI`iTS
7 NV�= STME NT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMI88ION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY STMENT/CAPACITY ($/FEW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (x 100)
COMMENTS
*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WIL.U/SCE'NIC NO
ESTUARIESYWETLANDS
RECR LAKESiRES.ERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT R:ES AFFECTED
FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
F_NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PROXON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO
POSSIBLE
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(68) PRESENTLY UNDER STUDY
*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WIL.U/SCE'NIC NO
ESTUARIESYWETLANDS
RECR LAKESiRES.ERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT R:ES AFFECTED
FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
F_NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PROXON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO
POSSIBLE
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(68) PRESENTLY UNDER STUDY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
sTATi i ALAy IAA
COUNTY: KETCHIKAN
PROJECT NAME
GC►K
P'RIORITYa HIGH
ACH I N
C�C)#�`ACH I N RIVER
LS4i, /1Si. 19.5
:ETCH I k'tiAh}
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PRO,J STATUSe IDENTIFIED SITE
*�**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
MET POWER HEAD (FT) 369
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) SS
CAPACITY- INSTALLED (KW) 6500 ,',
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 8561
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000)
I NVE STI"IENT . TRANS M I SS I CAN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O.JTPlJT ('/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS:
*** ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I Lip / SCEN T C NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL W I IwDL I FE HAL
FISHERIES HABITAT
FNDANGaI� RED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FA,CTOPS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC: I F:S
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UT T L I TY I NTERE'ST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
NHS USOS/AAA MAPS
NOTE A (6$ )
I
*** ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I Lip / SCEN T C NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL W I IwDL I FE HAL
FISHERIES HABITAT
FNDANGaI� RED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FA,CTOPS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC: I F:S
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UT T L I TY I NTERE'ST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
NHS USOS/AAA MAPS
NOTE A (6$ )
I
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: KETCHIKAN
PROJECT NAME
HASSLER LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
PRIORITYt HIGH
METLr'�#�SAT
�; 11 «O 113i 21:5. 9�iASSLEF; CREEK
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRiO�J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECO140MIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 3` 4
FLOW AV ANNUAL.. (CFS) 3
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 20
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 8700
DOWER S"I OR/AV FLOW :RATIO O
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTM� 14T . STE.UCTL IRE&GEN s $ i O�. 0 )
INVESTMENT. TRANSMISSION ($ t` 00 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS:
****:ENV I RONMENTAL. / $OCTAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR l..AKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE FLAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDA14GERE.D SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMFNTSt
NHS USCS/APA MAPS
!+NOTE, H (39 )
****:ENV I RONMENTAL. / $OCTAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR l..AKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE FLAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDA14GERE.D SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMFNTSt
NHS USCS/APA MAPS
!+NOTE, H (39 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04126/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KETCHIKAN PRIORITY MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG+
55
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
#�;ETCHI h;Ahi
MAH# #'BEY LAKE L.OWEP
2 .C� /1S1 �,Cti.0
MAHONEY CREED
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS. IDENTIFIED SITE
***�*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 84
FLOW AV ANNUALANNUAL(C:FS) 104
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1300
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 5900
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO Q
ANNUAL.. PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 OC�D )
INVESTMENTrTRAN MISSION ($1000)
1 NVEST11ENT /ENERGY OUTPUT ($/ MWH/YR )
INVESTPIENT 1CAPAC:I TY ( $/KW )
AV COST OFENFPGY ($/MWH)
%ENE:C' FIT/CST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS;
*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL.. WELD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKE'm/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/ STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
POSSIBLE
ANADROMOUS FISH
NO
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
CURRENTLY UNDER STUDY.
.
NOTE A(27)
*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL.. WELD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKE'm/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/ STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
POSSIBLE
ANADROMOUS FISH
NO
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
CURRENTLY UNDER STUDY.
.
NOTE A(27)
' AK 1 64 .'wd
U.S. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING NO INFORMATION i
04/26/S1
STATE-. ALAS KA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OT94EF DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
PROJ DEP / I NDEaP
NHS ID #
COUNTY; KETC:HIKAN PRIORtTY. MEDIUM
MAHONEY LAKE UPPER
55 25.0 / 131 31.1
MAHONEY LAKE GEORGE INLET
KETCH I KAN
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA012S
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
;*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
1825
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS >
A.S
CiAPACITY, INSTALLED
(vw)
14400
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
55590
POWER STOR/AV FLOW %RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.44
EQUIPMENT PMENT SELECTION
L1141 TS
I NVESTMENT , STRUCTURE'&GEN
($1 OOO )
I Nk'E8TMENT, TRAM SM I SS i ON
($1 0OO )
INVE= STMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWHIYR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
(a/KW)
AV GUST OF E14ERGY
($/MWH )
DENEE" i T/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS;
AHR I 78
�-;* i*0ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS No
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES.'RESERVOIPS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE } AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIFS
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT FRCS/COIN
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
RESIDENT FISH
NO
YES
SOURCES
COMMENT S ,
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(129) UNDER STUDY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY w-
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81,
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
FROJ PURPOSE
PROJ DEP/ I NDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: KETC:HIKAN
MANLANTTA LAKE
55 34.7 /131 1.
MANZANITA CREEK
REG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
KETCH I KAN
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
AK7NPS0312
:****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
268
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
556
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
26000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
124000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW -.RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVESTMCNT , STRI. CTURE &GEN
($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I SCE I Ohl
($1 a00 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT(*,/MWH/YR)
I NVE STMEN"T/CAFAC'i -ry
($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
M-.****ENV I RONMENTAL/ `.HOC I AL ACCEPTAS I L I TY FACTORS
PARKLANDS MAY BE IN MISTY FJORD NAT MONUMENT
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SI'rES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA%
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL.' STATE. AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/COIN
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL., CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/ APA MAPS
MAJOR IMPACT FROM 4 DAM COMPLEX
MOTE A 0113 )
" qAj-" 3. 65
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYnROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATES ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT /LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UT I L. I TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDE:P
NHS ID #
COUNTY: KETCHIKAN
NADZAHEEN LAKE
55 13.4 1131 27.9
NADZAHEEN LAKE
--- REr--,ION X
SITES RANKING INFORMATION
PRIORITY: HIGH
METLAHATL.A
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS„ IDENTIFIED SITE
AK7NPA0126
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NF'T POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (VW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GE:N ($1000 )
INVESi'MENT,TRANSMISSION ($1400)
II4VE.STMENT/ENERGY OI JTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTN wNT/CAPACITY ($/KWi
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (k 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
FACTORS
189
CEO
1500
6.324
0
0.48
*�**AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR;
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP A'rT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON!
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(2S)
,Al< 1 66
Ake 9 cal �+
1 J. S a DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: AL ASKA COUNTY: KETCHIKAN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT TAME
NAHA RIVER
HA C, I VEFi
BORING
37.9
UNDEVELOPED / REE WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO J STATUS s IDENTIFIED SITE
ic�****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEALS (FT)) 205
FLOW AV ANNUAL (i :F S) 195
CAPACITY, I N8TALLED (KW) 6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 26000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQU I PMEN`f SELECTION UN I TSw
INVES THE NT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 �}00 )
INVESTMENT . T RANSM I S'S I ON ($1 CEO£) )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY (#/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTSs AHRI 78
*V,v-"-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC.IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTGRES
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGE14CCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT FRO/CON.
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS i
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
No,rE A (63 )
*V,v-"-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC.IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTGRES
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGE14CCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT FRO/CON.
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS i
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
No,rE A (63 )
DAKI 68
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE s ALASKA
COUNTY; r KETC:H I KAN
PROJECT NAME.
ORCHARD CREEKCREEKLAT/LONG•
STREAM NAME
ORCHARD CREEK
29.0
PRIORITY: HIGH
I_IEdEaEVELOEIEE:� / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 169
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 580
CAPACITY, INSTAL -LED (Kt4) 9000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 44000
POWER STORiAV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT E�LEC:T I ON UNITS
1NVESTMENT.STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
!NVESTMENT, TRANSE� I SSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/CO ST RATIO tip 100)
COMMENTS: APPEARS TO DE IN CANADA. AHRI 78
*W>H��:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POE— I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS;
NIAS U SGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(63)
*W>H��:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POE— I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS;
NIAS U SGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(63)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
S'iATC: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PhC+J UEP I NDEF
NHS ID 0
COUNTY: KE'PC:H I KAN PR I CR I TY i HIGH
PERSEVERANCE LAKE
55 24.0 / 1'S1 40.0
WARD COVE CREED
WARD COVE
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
It INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA0129
*****ENG I VEER I iqG / ECONOMIC:
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (C.:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (14WH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTIJRE&GEN ($1000)
INVF_S #"MEAT, TRANSMISSION (`a+1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (t KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 O)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
539
37
3000
13350
4
0.5
***: * ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILL)/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A 463 F
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC- RESOURCE AND
04/26/91
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROM DE:P/ INDEP
NH3 ID #k
COUNTYa KETCHIKAN
LADE CONNELL DAM
55 26.0 / 131 40.2
WARD rrRiEEK
KETCHIKAN
EXISTING RES WITH DIVERSION
KETCHIKAN PULP COMPANY
CITY OF KETCHIKAN
WATER SUPPLY /OTHER
To INDEPENDENT
AY,DNPA0141
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC:
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERr ;" PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW .-RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQU I PM N'r SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT , TRANSM I SS I ON ($1 CU0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFi,r/CoS'r RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS:
— REG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
PRIGRITYN HIGH
PROD STATUS: PROJECT IN OPERATION
FACTORS
149
1.74
2000
10456
G.
0.59
*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC N� E
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE. AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
EXISTING: STRUCTURE
WATER SUPPLY TO CITY OF KETCHIKAN
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (68) OPER. WATER SUPPLY & OTHER USES
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOUnCE AND SITE RANK IMO INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: KETCH I KAN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STRFAM DAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
FLEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
PRO J DEP/ I NDEP
NHS ID #
WHITMAN LAKE DAM
55 17.9 /131 31.7
WH I TMAN CREEK
METLAKATLA
EXISTING / RESERVOIR
CITE' OF KFTCHIKAN
OTHER
I : INDEPENDENT
AKC:NPA2600
5* ***E.NG I NFER I NO / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL_ PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION EMITS
T NVE STMENT , STRUC"TURE&GEN ($1000 )
I DIVESTMENT . "1•TRANSM I CSC I ON ($1 G00 )
TNVFSTMENT/ENERGY ourP'UT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACfTY ($1KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
DENEF I T / C UST RATIO (n 100 )
COMMENTS: I NV DAM DATA
PROJ STATUS; ]IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
329
90
3000
3000
G.
0.11
*ik*�r;%ENV I ROhMMENTAL / EOC:I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS S NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAE
F T SHER I1~ S HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE:, AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
FNVIR CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO i C ON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
POSSIBLE. F I SH HATCHERY
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (55 )
71
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -w REG I CIN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/ 6/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KOBUK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
BUCKLAND
RIVER
/1 �1 S.0
DUNE LAP!UING
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
0. **:-*ENG I VEER I I�lG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 102
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 3326
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (I<W) 16000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 79C�GO
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
IPVFSTME,4TrSTRUC:TURE&GEN ($1C}OO)
ILAVESTMENT,TRANSMISSIOBI ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MwH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS 4
**i}**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL_ WILD /SCENIC` NO
ESTUARIES/WETLAND
RE'CR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SaTES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PLEB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/'CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/C:OM
UTILITY INTEREST
LOCATED D IN SELAW I K NAT WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS /APA MAPS
NOTE A (14 )
**i}**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL_ WILD /SCENIC` NO
ESTUARIES/WETLAND
RE'CR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SaTES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PLEB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/'CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/C:OM
UTILITY INTEREST
LOCATED D IN SELAW I K NAT WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS /APA MAPS
NOTE A (14 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION k
F" NW SMALL SCALE HYT)R ORLECTR I C RFSOURCE AND SITE RANK I Nib I NFORMAT I Odd
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT /LIONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
WROJ PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID 4
COUNTY: KOBUK
FISH RIVER
65 56.9 /160 30.0
FISH RIVER
BUCKLAND
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA0147
*****ENO I VEER I NO / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STORrAV FLOW „RATIO)
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O tTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACIT'i' ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 CEO )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
PROD STATUS:
FACTORS
102
994
13000
60000
0.
0.52
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
IDENTIFIED SITE
*f**ENVIRONMENTAL/ OCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARTES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT POSSIBLE
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PROXON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PROXON
UTILITY INTEREST YES
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
C:C'MMENTSe NOTE A (16 )
:Ar i 73 t
S. .
AK a 74
�A
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RATING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KOBUK PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
KIWALIK
I IdAL I K RIVER
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS. IDENTIFIED SITE
** *ENOTNEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 209
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFI, i 457
C: ',PAC: I TY 4 INSTALLED (KW) 14000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) r�O000
POWER STOLE/AV FLOW ;RATIO O.
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.48 SELECTION EQUIPMENT I IN T TS
I NVESTMFNT . STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NV E STMENT r TRANSM I S3I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPIJT ($/MWH/`�`R )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (*/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (m 100 )
COMMENTS= REQ 116 YRS TO REACH ULTIMATE CAPACITY
*****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICLSO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR:
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REw AFFECTED
P`OL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL_ PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USOS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS. NOTE A (1 s')
*****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICLSO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR:
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REw AFFECTED
P`OL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL_ PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USOS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS. NOTE A (1 s')
U.S. DEPARTMENT 'OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE m ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT /LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROJ DEP/INDEP
NHS ID
COUNTY: KOBUK
KOGOLUKTUK RIVER
66 58.9 / 1- 56 37.9
KOGOLI.IKTUK RIVER
KOBUK
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I : ? NDEPENDENT
Ak16NPA09 O
**** ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (l'W )
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH)
POWER STOR/AV FLOW *WRATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMEN-r/CAFIA€.yITY (,A/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEF I. T/COST RATIO (X 100 )
CONMENTS 1 AHR I 7;
PRIORITYs HIGH
PROS! STATUSi IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
84
484
8000
37000
0
0.52
1:�rk** ENV I RONMENTAL / SCiC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL, WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REy AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO, -'CON
ENVIR GRIP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP AYT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NO APPARENT MAJOR IMPACTS
NOTE A(SB)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY --
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
O4/26/S1
STATE; ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
h'UNICIPALIT`!
RESOURCE TYPE:
(OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO J PURPOSE
PRO J DEP / I NDIr P
NHS ID #
COUNTY: KOGi. K
KUGRUK
65 54.0 / 162 42.9
KUGRUK RIVER
REGION
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
CH I CAGO
UNDEVELOPED / RFSERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS; IDENTIFIFD SITE
AK6NPA0152
:****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL ( MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSMISSICAN i$1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OI_ITPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST f71F ENERGY ($r°MWH)
EENEFiT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
FACTORS
224
492
16000
73000
0.
0.52
*ip:§a*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC YES
ESTIJARIES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL, WiLDLIF r HAB
PTSHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REW AFFECTED
POL. IT I CAL.. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO!C:ON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOC XAL,. ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS L l S01S / APA MAPS
COMMENTS: DOTE A (15)
.``K1 7A
AK 1 77 �.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE ALASKA COUNTY i KOD I AK. PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
AYAKUL I K
7 1S. 1 /1 23.9
AYA�UL I �b
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSe IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 180
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 455
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 10000
EWEROY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) ��9000
POWER S'# 0R, AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUC':Ti ARE&OEN ($ �, 000 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVF_STME'NT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*�**ENV I RUNMENT4L/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CyRP ATT PR'O I CON
UTILITY.INTEREST
NO
IN KOD I AK. NAIL WILDLIFE REFUGE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USG S/APA MAPS
140TE A (S1 )
*�**ENV I RUNMENT4L/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CyRP ATT PR'O I CON
UTILITY.INTEREST
NO
IN KOD I AK. NAIL WILDLIFE REFUGE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS. USG S/APA MAPS
140TE A (S1 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - RECION X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HY''l-IROFLF,CTR I C: RESOURCE AND S I T't=- RANKING INFORMATION
04/216/G1
STATE: ALA KA COUNTY: KODIAK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
FFiASER LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAK f NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PRO�J DEP/ INDEP
I % TNDEPENDEMT
NHS ID #�
AK7NPA0160
7 ii. f15q 10.1
DOG SALMON CREEK
AYAF4LlL T i�
UNDEVELOPED f RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
P'ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
w****ENO I NFER I NO f ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
301
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CF a)
179
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
7000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON -ANNUAL
(MWH)
32000
POWER STORfAV FLOW :RATIO
G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.52
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN
($1009)
INVESTMENT.TRANSMISSION
($1UO�i)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTP'UT($/MWHfYR)
i NVE'4 TMEN'T'/CAP'AC:I TY
($ /KW )
AV C O �T OF ENFRCiY
($ /MWH )
BENE:F I T �' CO T RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS.
AHRI 78
ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATF AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/COPS
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NO
IN KODIAK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
IN NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS USGS/APA MAP'`
NOTE A(53)
,AK I 78
" K-1��I 7 �
' f'7I"ti 7
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION k
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE. ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LA r/LONG
STREAM NAME
NUNICTPALITY
RESOUPCE TYPE
OWNER
1 L.EC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
P'ROJ PURPOSE
PRO....t DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: KOOIAK
KARLUK LAKE
57 23.0 / 154 3.0
KARLUK RIVER
LARSEN SAY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I : INDEPENDENT
AK6NPAO161
->-' *KE190 I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (.Fw )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ,RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMI SSION ( 1QO0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPIJT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEF:I'r/COST RATIO (x 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
P'ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
343
.414
18000
85000
0
GR15S
#=�***ENVIRONMENTAL,/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENYIAL WILD/'SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CR I T I CAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT PIES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDFRAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB AT"i PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/►-':Oi l
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
IN KODIAK NATL WILDLIFE REFUGE
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (61 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION K
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KOD I AK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
OLC+A BAY
CLCA NARROWS
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DTYERSION (MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
MET POWER HEAD (FT) 63
FLEW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 980
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (K(4) 8000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 37000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW i RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.52
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, tiTRUCTURE&BEN ($1000)
I NYE, STMENT � TRANSM I SS T CN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENFR6Y OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTME:NT!C':APAC I T-1 (i*lk;W )
AV COST OF ENERC'5Y ($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS % AHR I 78
PARKLANDS"AENYTRCNMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERYOI RS I
CULT RESOURCE SITES i
CR I T I CAL W I Lai.. I FE NAB POSSIBLE. IN KOD I AID 14AT WILDLIFE REFUGE
FISHERIES HAIL i TAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED f
POLITICAL FACTORS ON NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIESL LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CONSSOCIALGRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST I
SOURCES MHS. USG S/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (42 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81,
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KODIAK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME:
LAT /LONG 57
STREAM NAME SP I R I D4N LAKEMUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTTLITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP / I NDEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS XD * Ak:twNPA0164
PROw� STATUSi IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
MET POWER HEAD (FT) 459
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 81
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KVj) 6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL, (MWH) 24806
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.47
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNIT+
INVESTMENT. STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT , TRANSM .E SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWHf �rR )
T NVESTMENT /CAPAC:I TY ($/I<W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (1 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 79
**mENVIRONMENTAL/0-0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
WILD/SCENIC-
ESTUARIES / WE'TLAMOS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS.
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITTCAL FACTORS
FEDERAO STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
IN KOD I AID NAT T ONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
IN NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SP I F: I %CAN LADE
SFtiN ,,tU�+,t:t
40.0 / 40.0
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
NHS USOSe/APA MAPS
NOTE A(51)
PROw� STATUSi IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
MET POWER HEAD (FT) 459
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 81
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KVj) 6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL, (MWH) 24806
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.47
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNIT+
INVESTMENT. STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT , TRANSM .E SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWHf �rR )
T NVESTMENT /CAPAC:I TY ($/I<W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (1 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 79
**mENVIRONMENTAL/0-0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
WILD/SCENIC-
ESTUARIES / WE'TLAMOS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS.
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITTCAL FACTORS
FEDERAO STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
IN KOD I AID NAT T ONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
IN NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SP I F: I %CAN LADE
SFtiN ,,tU�+,t:t
40.0 / 40.0
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
NHS USOSe/APA MAPS
NOTE A(51)
**mENVIRONMENTAL/0-0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
WILD/SCENIC-
ESTUARIES / WE'TLAMOS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS.
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITTCAL FACTORS
FEDERAO STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
IN KOD I AID NAT T ONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
IN NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
SP I F: I %CAN LADE
SFtiN ,,tU�+,t:t
40.0 / 40.0
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
NHS USOSe/APA MAPS
NOTE A(51)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDRUE'LEC'rR I C RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/2 /81
S''rATE : ALASKA COUNTY: KOD I AK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SPIRIi'1OIV RIVER
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
SPR 71"aON RIVER
MUNICIPALITY
SAN w1UAN
38.9
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
is *�**E;NG I NEE:R I N0 / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 269
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 600
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (KW) 5000
ENERGY FRODUCT I CN--ANNI SAL (MWH) 107853
POWER STGR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNIT:
I NVESTME HT . STR{ �CTURF&nEN ($1000 )
INVES"rMENT, TRAM �MI'kSION ($1000 )
I NVE �:TMENT /ENERGY OUTPkJT ($ / MWH/YR )
I NVESTMENT.,'CAPAC ITY ($/YW )
AV COST O FNEROY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMME14TS: AHRT 78 USGS
-�:**#ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL 3 T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRCE/C0N
ENVIR GRF ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO /CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS-.
"` k F-,K 1 Ste'.
NO
IN KOD I AK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED Oil NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS U GS/APA MAPS
NOTE A 019 )
-�:**#ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL 3 T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRCE/C0N
ENVIR GRF ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO /CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS-.
"` k F-,K 1 Ste'.
NO
IN KOD I AK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED Oil NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS U GS/APA MAPS
NOTE A 019 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RE0ICN X
PNt4 SMALL, SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATEa ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM DAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP / I NDEP
NHS ID ##
COUNTY: KOD i AK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
TERROR LAKE
57 40.0 / 15S 4. �
TERROR RIVER
SAN JUAN
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA0166
** ***ENG I NECR I NG I ECONOMIC:
NET POWER HEALS (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (lew )
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTI RE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT , TRANSM I Sti I ON
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR
)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
ENV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(k 100 )
COMMENTS:
FERC DATA
PROD STATUS# IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
1148
99
20000
139000
0
0.79
PF70 AHRI 78
P�i**�-ENVIRDNMENTAL/SCC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS UNIDENTIFIED PARKLAND
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOEREU SPECIE":
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB :ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
WILDLIFE HABITAT
ANADROMOUS FISH
NO
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA GAPS
UNDER STUDY
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26FS1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KODIAK PRIORI'CY: MEDIUM
PROJECT 14AME
UG
AN I K
UGANIK RIVER
7 41.C� /1 S 23.1
SAN JUAN
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAT) (FT) 89
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 653
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2 000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH). '1651O
POWER ST+OR/AV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.51
F= OU T C' PENT SELECTION UNITS
I LAVES TMENT , S TRUC:Ti._ R, &GEN ($1000)
TNVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT. ENERGY € IJTP �T ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF FNEROY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COOT RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: USGS
�: ****E_NV I RONMENTAL / SOC:I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICWILD/SCENICESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HAB I TA' i
ENDANGERED SPECIES:
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT F'RO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE;
COMMENTS:
140
IN KODIAK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED CAN NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS USGS/APA MAP:
IN KODIAK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
NOTE A(74�
�: ****E_NV I RONMENTAL / SOC:I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICWILD/SCENICESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HAB I TA' i
ENDANGERED SPECIES:
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT F'RO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE;
COMMENTS:
140
IN KODIAK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
LOCATED CAN NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS
NHS USGS/APA MAP:
IN KODIAK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
NOTE A(74�
Aid 1 85-
U . S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: KUS;I' OKWI M PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LATILONO
STREAM NAME
MLIN IC I PALL T
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
E'E.EC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
J PRO PURPOSE
14YDR OELEC:TR T C
Pftil"I�.J DEP/INDEX-
I: INDEPENDENT
NH - ID #
AK7NPA017S
Is;laSiOk W I ICI RIVER
/ 19.9
IODIOIW I M RIVER SF`
RAINY PASS LODGE
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
#. *ENCINEFRING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
173
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
15S
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(K.W)
1 Ft000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
7,� 000
POWER ST€ R/AV FLOW ;RATIO
0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EOU I PMENT SELECTION
C!N I T S
INVE.STMFPIT, STRUC:Tl.JI" E&GEN
($1000)
I {VESTMENT , *rRANSM I SS i ON
($1000
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTP!_IT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHR I 75
*l*r-**FMVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP A'TT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
MANY EXISTING SETTLEMENTS IN AREA
ANADROMOUS FISH AREA
INCLUDED IN APA 252. UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS.
NVIS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (41 )
Page 1-86 Missing
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- RE�C4ION X
PNW SHALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALAS IAA COUNTY: MATANUSKA—SUS I TN PR I CAR I TY a MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONO
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
FRO J PURPOSE
PROD DEI= / I NDEP
NHS I D #
BELUGA LOWER
61 15.0 /151 0.0
PELUGA RIVER
BEL13GA
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I : INDEPENDENT
Ak 6NPAO174
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC:
NET (SOWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (VW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT. °w TRUCTURE&GEN ($1 O0D )
I NVEs*rMENT . TRAN RM IFS I ON ($1000 )
INVF5TMENT/ENEF:GY UUi"F°UT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/tC,�PACITY ($/ VW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST FIAT 7 0 ()( 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
PROD STATUS:
FACTORS
49
2470
105ODO
72000
0
0.54
IDENTIFIED SITE
U*".UENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
DATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE.:= AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT IRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS-.
MAJOR ANADROMOUS FISHERY J�
I
I
NHS L.iSGS / AF'A MAPS
NOTE A (41 )
i. 87
'Dr'
AID 1 SS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/B1
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY; MATANUSKA-SUSITN
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC:
PRO�J UEP/ INDE:P
I : INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NPA0212
PRIORITY: HIGH
STRANCL I NE �..Ak E
C� 1 . (7 / 151 55.9
BELUGA
SELI�GA
UNDEVELOPED RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
� �**aENGINEERTNG / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
851
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(C:F S)
159
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
17000
ENEPOY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
81000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW wRATIO
G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
114VESTMENT. =.TRUCTURE:&G N
($1000 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OtJTP'UT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
DVLPMT OF UPPER
BELUGA REDUCES AAE
)*#ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE+/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES: HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFEC"1'ED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP A'rT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
12 GWH AHRI 76
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE a:7).)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG T ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: MATANUSKA,—SUSITN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
BOULDER CREEKLAT
/ L. ONCE
147
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
PROS! STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 917
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 92
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 7000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (Mir#H) S5i�OE:s
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO Q
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE& BEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENTIENERG`# t�UTPUT O�/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/FEW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS:
*v-**F_NV I RONMENTAL / SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLAND S
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
C:R I T ,T, CAL WILDLIFE H1AU
FISHERIES HABTTAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL.TTICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGEtICIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV IR GRP ATT PRO -?CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST"
POSSIBLE
*v-**F_NV I RONMENTAL / SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLAND S
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
C:R I T ,T, CAL WILDLIFE H1AU
FISHERIES HABTTAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL.TTICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGEtICIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV IR GRP ATT PRO -?CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST"
POSSIBLE
DENA:L I
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A(31.) S US I TNA PROD IS LEST ALTERNATIVE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION X
P NW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANK T NO INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: MATANUSKA►-SUS I TN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME:
LAT /LONG
STREA" NAME
MUNICIPALITY'
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
HYDROEI...FCTR I C:
PRO�J DEP/INDE:.P
T: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NPA0176
BOULDER CREEK 1
r,1 /14 4.9
BOULDER CREEK
PALMER
UNDEVELOPED RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*�z***ENG I DEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
1315
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(C:FS)
113
CAPAC: I TY , INSTALLED
(KW)
14000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
69000
POWER aTOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UN I ";"
I NVESTMFNT . S TRlJCTURl= &CgEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT . TRANSM T S S I ON
($1000 )
INVESTMENT'ENERGY C'Jt JTPUT *%$/MWli/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEF• I T; C:OOT RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS: r:
AHR I 78
Ov-�*�ENV'(RONMENTAL/sc)cIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR_
PARKLANDS, NO
POTENTIAL_ WILD/SCENICNEI
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REOR LAVES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL W I LDL.. I FE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
1= NV I R GRP ATT PRO /C':ON
SOCIAL QRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
MOTE: A ( 4 )
i
U.S. $. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- RE13I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE; AL ASKA COUNTY., MATANUSKA"" aI..US I TN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
GTREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELE.0 UT I L_ I TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
RROJ PURPOSE
O SE
PROD DEP J I NDE:P
NHS ID ##
RUSH LANE
61 49.9 /148
BOULDRR CREED;
CH I CKAsLOON
UNDEVELOPED �
HYDROELECTRIC
I a INDEPENDENT
AK7NPAO2G9
15.0
RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
*ENG I NEED I NG / EC:ONOM I C
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFO)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODU('�T I ON --ANNUAL_ (MWH .)
POWER STOR/AV FLOW a RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRI, CTURE&Gt*N ($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPIJT ($/MWL-LJYR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($fKW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWM)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
*�**mENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE s AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
PROD STATUS; IDENTFiED SITE
FACTORS
891
iCB
9000
45000
CU.
�] C
0. 5
ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
SOURCES NHS USGS/ A,PA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (84
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY --
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT / LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS zD #
COUNTY: MATANUSKA—SUSITN
CARIBOU C:REEI
REO I ON
SITE RANKING INFORMATIOff!
61 46.9 / 147 34.9
CARIBOU CREEK
SHEEP MOUNTAIN INN
UNDEVFLOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROEL, I C,TR I C
INDEPENDENT
�K6NPA01i8
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODi �CT I ON —ANNUAL ( MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
i NVESTMENT . STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT.TRANSMISSION ($1000;
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT./CAPACITY ($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: UNFEASIBLE
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
526
504
19000
90000
0
0.54
CONSTRUCTION POOR FOUNDATION
�*iD:"-*EN«IRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO"'CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
C OMMENTS o
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (14) SEVERE SEDIMENTATION!
t
� . Awd' �01
.1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING I NFORMAT I OPI
04,/26/S1
STATE: ALAS E 4A COUNTY: MATANUSKA--SUS I TIC 1= R I OR I TY : MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
C HUN
I LI+JA
REFt;
SHE'RMAN
UNDEVELOPED0.0
/ RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
i= ROU STATUS i IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING ,' ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 197
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 524
C'APkC ITY, INSTALLED . (FEW) 5000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 25000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL E'I-ANT FACTOR 4.57
EQUIPMENT SELEC T T ON UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURF&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSMISSION ($100.) )
T14VESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH!YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY ($, KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST FIT /COST RATIO ()( 1 OCR )
COMMENTSs AHRI 78
�***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIFS HABITAT
E14DANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRIP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CON SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USG S / APA MARS
NOTE A(25)
�***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIFS HABITAT
E14DANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRIP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CON SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USG S / APA MARS
NOTE A(25)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL,,SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
O4/26/81
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: MATANUSKA--SUS 7 TN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
L UC
Y
CH�.iL I TNA RIVER
-, ! 14t7 57.9
CHL1L I TNA
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRGJ STATUS: a IDENTIFIED SITE
**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 165
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) :�5SS
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (lew) 15000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 71000
POWER' S TOR / AY FLOW :RATIO d
AN14LJAL PLANT FACTOR!0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, 'TRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVEsTMENT : TRAN#SM I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($.•'MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPAINVESTMENT/CAPACITY($/KW )
A`) COST OF E:NE RCY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
***: *ENV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLAND NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTIJAR I ES;/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR'S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE. IMPORTANT FISHERY. ANA/ RES F I S14
1
i
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(24) f
r l
f Akti 1 94
t .r±
***: *ENV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLAND NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTIJAR I ES;/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR'S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE. IMPORTANT FISHERY. ANA/ RES F I S14
1
i
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(24) f
r l
f Akti 1 94
t .r±
AK 1 957
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: MATANUSKA—SU I Ted PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT DAME
LAT/LONG 62
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRO.J OEP/INUEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AI{ 6NPA0206
RIVER
UNDEVELOPED
CtH I O
CHLIL I TNA
'7. S / 1. "� 43.5
CHULITNA►
/ RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 223
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 3064
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) SO�1GO
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWN) 144000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NkIESTMENT , STRUCTURP:&GEN ($1 000 )
I NVESTi" TENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1. CIGG )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($IMWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY' ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
it*r-i*l-:E1NV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAYS
FISHERIES HABITAT'
ENDANGERED SPECIES
QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S ?AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL_ ORP ATT PRO/COIN
UTILITY INTEREST
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOUS FISHERY
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USDA/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (45 )
CtH I O
CHLIL I TNA
'7. S / 1. "� 43.5
CHULITNA►
/ RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 223
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 3064
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) SO�1GO
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWN) 144000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NkIESTMENT , STRUCTURP:&GEN ($1 000 )
I NVESTi" TENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1. CIGG )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($IMWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY' ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
it*r-i*l-:E1NV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAYS
FISHERIES HABITAT'
ENDANGERED SPECIES
QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S ?AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL_ ORP ATT PRO/COIN
UTILITY INTEREST
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOUS FISHERY
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USDA/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (45 )
it*r-i*l-:E1NV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAYS
FISHERIES HABITAT'
ENDANGERED SPECIES
QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S ?AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL_ ORP ATT PRO/COIN
UTILITY INTEREST
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOUS FISHERY
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USDA/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (45 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY --
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/2 /81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONE+
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO.J PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: MATANJSKA-SUSITN
REG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
CHULITNA EF
63 10.0 /149 25.0
E FORK C:HUL I TNA RIVER
COLORADO
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC:
I: INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA01S2
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW .RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&DEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMIS:-ION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY %IIJTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PRO,J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
379
331
12000
59000
0
0.56
Nam**:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL MILD/SCENIC: NO
E STUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO -)CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
RESIDENT FISH ANACROMOUS FISH
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (22 )
U.S, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW 'SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: MATANU SKA— SUS I TN PR I OR I TY v MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
CHUL I TNA W
F
ED
�.' a. /14 35.2
W FORK rHUL I TNA RIVER
P RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 286
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFa�) 883
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 14000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 68000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW s RATI0 O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQU I PNENT SELECTION UNITS
TNVESTME= STRt JC:T�..RE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMEN`� , TRANSM I S S I GN ( 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ('$IKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/NWH)
CENEFIT/COST RATTO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
WhAvENVIRONMENTAL/ 0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITFS
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORSFEDERAL/ STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
C OMMENTS s
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(33)
WhAvENVIRONMENTAL/ 0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITFS
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORSFEDERAL/ STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
C OMMENTS s
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(33)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE s ALASKA
PROJECT NAIVE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO J PURPOSE
PRO,„I i CEP / I NDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY; MATANUSKA--EUSITN
KASHWITNA
61 57.2 / 1 9 56.0
KAEHW I TNA RIVER
CASWELL
UNDEVELOPED
HYDROELECTRIC:
In INDEPENDENT
Ai*`6NPA0196
- £AEG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
RESERVOIR (MODIFIED )
*****FN I NEER I NG / ECONOMIC:
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AY ANNUAL (CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED �Kw )
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW 3 RA I•IO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . ti TRUC:TURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMIS ION ($1000)
I NVE TME:NT/ ENERGY OUTPUT ($ /MWH /YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACrry ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERC•Y ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USOS
PRIORITYi MEDIUM
PRO.J ETATLI c IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
234
570
20000
89178
0
0.5
****ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC'ENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RE(:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RiE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT FARO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
PO SS I BLE
RESIDENT AND ANAI; ROMOUS FISH
MHS USGS/APA MAPS
140TE A (1 S )
AK 1 99
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE 2 ALASKA COUNTY: MATANUSKA•-SUS I TN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LON
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
I~`ICE�GUCAL
LADE CREED L.OI�IER
0.0
I..AI�,E CREEKt.JNDEVEI UNDEVELOPED / RESER VET I R ( MOD T F I IED )
PRG..J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**** CNG I NEER I NG / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 304
FLOW AV AN14IAL (CFS) 980
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 22000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWIA) 105000
POWER STOR/Akx FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL P .ANT FACTOR 0.54
EGUTPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, GTRUC"TU E&OFN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT.TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRT 78
****-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
FNDANGEFED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONUT T L I TY INTEREST
�T
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT MAJOR OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENT�a.
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(4O)
****-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
FNDANGEFED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONUT T L I TY INTEREST
�T
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT MAJOR OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENT�a.
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(4O)
1J. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE. RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE': ALASKA COUNTY: MATANU SKA— SU S I TN PRIORITY: MEI"s I UM
PROJECT NAME
LRT/LONG
STREAM NAME
LAKE CREEK
I.AIE :REEK UlPER
�L�. 4 / 151 27'. 9
CI-lATTI�tA LODGE
UNDEVELOPED / RFS WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO.J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**;:*•�ENGI'NEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 559
FLOW AV ANNt, Al- 4 CFS) 245
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 15004
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 74000
, POWER TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
I NVE �TMFNT, TRANSM I .� S.I ON ($1000 )
DIVESTMENT/ENERGY ►tJTPUT($/MWH/YR)
TNVESTMENT/}=At A,CITY (*/KW)
AV COST OF E14ERGY ($/MWH)
BEN FTT/CtkST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*W-***FNV I RONMENTAL. /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR-:
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL. /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/C&N
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL C•RP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOUS FISH
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(4I)
.JAK 1 100
*W-***FNV I RONMENTAL. /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR-:
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL. /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/C&N
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL C•RP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOUS FISH
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(4I)
.JAK 1 100
101
U - S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REG I ON X
PNW SPIALL SCALE HYDR.OELEc"rR I C RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/ /81
STATE: AL.ASKA COUNTY: MATANUSKA-SUS I TN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
MOOSE C
ES���Fi
yi
� F�EE
p 1.9
MATANUSF A RIVER
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSi IDENTIFIED SITE
-wENGIVEERINO ,- ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1.65
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 4027
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21, 000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL t MWH) 100000
POWER STAR/AV FLOW. : RA710 a
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I DIVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT . TRANSM I S S I ON ($1 �' 00 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
Ck �MMENTS x AHR I 78
mmo#rENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV I R ORP AT'r PRO/CC' N
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOi iS FISH
SOURCES
COMMENTS
WHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (35 )
mmo#rENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV I R ORP AT'r PRO/CC' N
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOi iS FISH
SOURCES
COMMENTS
WHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (35 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY --
P'NW $MALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/d 6/S1
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: MATANUSKA-SUSITN
PALMED
61 32.9 / 149 4.9
MATANUSKA RIVER
REGION X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PALMIER
U14DEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I; INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
AK7NPA0207
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I INVESTMENT , STRUC TLIRE&GEN ($1000 )
INVE.STMENT,TRANSMISSION. ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 OCR )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
FACTORS
1a
A-027
16000
79000
G
0.56
*�*w°ENVIR0NMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/fXENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
C'R I T I CAL WILDLIFE HAB POSSIBLE
FISHERIES HABITAT ANADROMOUS FISH
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/C'CIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LITILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS IAP'A MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(31)
.,,AK 102 _.
D'AKI 1 fir; N
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE 14YDROELEC:TRI C RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26 /81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: MATANUS A —SUS I TN PR I OR T TY e MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
TALAC:HUL I TNA RIVER
61 45.9 / 151 27. E
TALACHULITNA RIVER
SKNENTHA
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOTR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I : INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA0214
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITE
INVESTMENT . S7'1" UCTURF&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (x 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
230
994
28000
137000
0
0.55
3*�***-ENVIRONME.NTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLA►14DS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC Nb
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAI_ FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIE'S
LOCAL PUB A►TT PRO/COON
ENVIR CRP A"1 T PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/COON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
RESIDENT AND ANADROMOUS FISH
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGSS/!SPA MAPS
NOTE A(25)
Page 1-104 Missing
Page 1-105 Missing
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY —
P'NW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTYi NOME
RFO I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
ANVIK RIVER
62 43.0 / 160 26.9
A14VIK RIVER
ANVIK.
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
Ia TNDEP'ENDENT
AK6NP'A0391
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED CKW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH)
POWER STAR/AV FLOW s RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCT} ARE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1000)
1 NVESTME14T /ENERGY OLJTi"UT($/l*)H/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
SENEFI'T/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS t
VERY FLAT
PROJ STATUS;
FACTORS
75
130
1400
59500
0
4.85
TERRAIN AHRI 75
PRIORITY: HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
#�:*?* NVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCE N I C NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RFCR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPE OJ ES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUR ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
fES
NHS. USES/APA MARS
NOTE A : 2 3) NOT A FEASIBLE PROD WITH DAM
AY1 106
E.J. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
P'NW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE % ALASF tiA COUNTY: NONE FR I OR I TY % MEDIUM I
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNTCIPA:•LITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO. PURPOSE
PRG._� DEP/ I NUEP
NHS ID #k
AK7NPA0227
wALMON LAME
�•4 4. ' / 165 0.0
FRUGAMEP'A RIVER
IRON CREEK
�_�NDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PR`O � STATUS:
•**M-*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAT)
(FT)
154
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
368 E
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(Few)
1GG0
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
24044 f
POWER aTOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
1
INVESTMENT.STRUCT�tRE&GEN
($1000)
:INVESTMENT, TRANSMISSION
( l000)
t
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPl.lT ($/M!4H/YR)
f
INVESTMENT /CAPACITY
($ i SSW)
f
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH k
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100;
COMMENTSe
AHRI TO USOS
1
*�"#ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL
ACC:EPTABIL-ITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAP
FISHERIES HABITAT
POSSIBLE
ENDANGEREDSPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
I
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CCJN
{
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONI
UTILITY INTEREST
.SOURCES
NHS USG :/S PA
MAPS
COMMENTS:
NOTE A(2O)
, i 1 107
I�
I
t.
108
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGIC:N X
FNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING I NFORMAT ION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA%"A COUNTY: NONE PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
KUZITRIN RIVER
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
K
UZITRIN RIVER
TELLER
UNDEVELOPED0.9
.> RESERVOIR ( MODIFIED )
PROD STATUSv IDENTIFIED SITE
�; ** **ENO I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEALS (FT) 94
FLOW AV ANNUAL (t.FS) 3138
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 14000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 67000
PCIWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
?,NNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVFSTMFNT :. STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
I NVES"rMENT r TRAN SM I SS I ON ($1 O0O )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/Kw )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
C OMMENTS i AHR I 78 i SGS
i*#-*#ENVIRONMENTAL / S OC, I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLMNDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RED: R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FIST -#FRIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER N€�T RES AFFECTED
POL. I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
COMMENTS.- NOTE A (14)
i*#-*#ENVIRONMENTAL / S OC, I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLMNDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS POSSIBLE
RED: R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FIST -#FRIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER N€�T RES AFFECTED
POL. I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
COMMENTS.- NOTE A (14)
•,w, AV 1 109
L..
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: OUTER KETCHIKAN
PROJECT NAME
LAVLONG
STREAM DAME
PRIORITY: HIGH
EAGLE', LADE
EAGLE
25.0
BELL ISLAND
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS e IDENTIFIED SITE
*�**wENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 284
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 4.43
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 9500
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ;RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION LlNfTS
INVESTMENT , STRUC-TIJRE&GEN ($1. GG0 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMIySION ($1000i
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWHi YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (1/vw )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/IIWH )
re-ENEF IT/COS'T RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
*PENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PART<LANDti NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR t-AKESIRE'SER'VGIRS�
CULT RESOURCE SITE
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA'T RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB AiTT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP•,ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRF ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSE I RL.E
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENT St
NIAS USG S / APAi MAPS
NOTE A (32)
*PENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PART<LANDti NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR t-AKESIRE'SER'VGIRS�
CULT RESOURCE SITE
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA'T RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB AiTT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP•,ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRF ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSE I RL.E
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENT St
NIAS USG S / APAi MAPS
NOTE A (32)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA%,A COUNTY: OUTER KETC:H I KAN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
C:H3wSTER LAKE
LAT/LONG
55
STREAM � NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO�J PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
J PRO OEP/ I NDEF
I : INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AKPNPA0097
.1 11G1 51.6
NICHG! S OE=FSTREAM
METLAE�ATLA
EXISTING WITH RETIRED DOWER PLANT
METLAsc:A`TLA POW AND LIGHT
/ RES WITH DIVERSION
PRE 1 �i STATUS t PROJECT IN OPERATION
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
749
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CIFS)
26
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
2500
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH4
5221
POWER STOR/AV FLOW -RATIO
D
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.23
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUC:TURF&C7EN
($1000 )
I NVE= STMENT , TRANSM I `ryS I ON
(1;1 GQ£] )
I14VESTMENT/E'NERG OUTPUT ($/MNH/YR
)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF FNE�ROY
t $/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/ rCEN I C. NO
E STLlARIES/WE*rLAMDS
REOR LALAKES/RESERVOIRSLAKES/RESERVOIRSCULT RESOURCE SITE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL, FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENV IR CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PROXCIN
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (94 )
-�zi.. I Ito
.7
r
DAKI. III
c
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: OUTER KETCHIKAN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAMES
SHORT CREEK
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
YES SAY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD P fRPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC:
PPOJ DEP / I NDE:P
I n . I NDEPEENDE:NT
NHS ID I
AK7NPAO24()
REFLECTION LAD30.9
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
Q* *ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
324
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CF s '+
216
GAPAC :I T?r , I N STALLED
(KW)
10000
ENERGY PiOOUCTlON--ANNUAL
(MWH)
46739
POWER `TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOP
0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
T NVE STME.NT . STRUCTURE&DEN
($1 O0D )
INVESTMENT .TRANSMISSION
($1 £)0G )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MW-1/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($ /IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78 USGS
**O**E:NV�IRONMENTAL/ SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS CLOSE TO WILDERNESS BOUNDARY
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RE:CR LA�.EwS/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS :,
FEDERAL/ STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PROXON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USES/AEA MAPS
WOTE A ( SCE )
U . S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG ION X
PN.•I SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: OUTER KETCH I ELAN PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME SALMON RIVER
LAT/LONG 56 2.0 /130 10.0
STREAM NAME SALMON RIVER
MUNICIPALITY NINE MILE
RESOURCE TYKE UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP / I NDEP I: INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID # AK6NPA0 38
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
5T
FLOW AV 'ANNUAL
(OFS)
S'S6
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
8000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL
(MWH)
34600
POWER =:TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURE& EN
($1000)
INVESTMENT. TRANSMISS ION
($100C )
I NVESTMENT/ENE ROY OIJI'PUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACI T `r
($/EeW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
►X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78
#*#,Xw-E•NVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER BEAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/`STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
Ew NV I R C+RP ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LET I L t TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (62 )
e�F� 112
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RErl I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: OUTER KETC:HIKAN
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO,. PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I. 3NDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK6NPA� 239
GHELOICUM
GHE'LOI�UM CREED
/11 :-47.9
YES LAY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS -.
**** ~NG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 349
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 216
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 14000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 50331
POWER STOR/AV FLOW s RATI0 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVEti TMENT, STRI, CTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I S S I ON ($1()OO )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/Ml4H/YR)
I NVEOTMENT: CAPAC I TY ($/KW )
AV COST CIF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I I �8 USGS
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
*�#*ENV I RONMENTAL/SCEC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKESiREEERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
14ATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
P'CJI_ I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE A6ENCIE°
LOCAL POPS ATT PRO,-'CONPRO,-'CONENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSs
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USr , i / APA MAPS
NOTE A (96.)
sAK I 19
GHELOICUM
GHE'LOI�UM CREED
/11 :-47.9
YES LAY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS -.
**** ~NG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 349
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 216
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 14000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 50331
POWER STOR/AV FLOW s RATI0 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVEti TMENT, STRI, CTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I S S I ON ($1()OO )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/Ml4H/YR)
I NVEOTMENT: CAPAC I TY ($/KW )
AV COST CIF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I I �8 USGS
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
*�#*ENV I RONMENTAL/SCEC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKESiREEERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
14ATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
P'CJI_ I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE A6ENCIE°
LOCAL POPS ATT PRO,-'CONPRO,-'CONENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSs
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USr , i / APA MAPS
NOTE A (96.)
sAK I 19
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
*�#*ENV I RONMENTAL/SCEC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKESiREEERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
14ATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
P'CJI_ I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE A6ENCIE°
LOCAL POPS ATT PRO,-'CONPRO,-'CONENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSs
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USr , i / APA MAPS
NOTE A (96.)
sAK I 19
� r
AK1 114
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALA SKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
56
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
t�LAWCCIz
.
BLACK DFAFt LADE
,��. 0.5
BLACK LEAF' CREEK
UNDEVELOPED / RE'S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NEI' POWER HEAD (FT) 1458
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 19
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (lew) 5004
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 22000
POWER STOR,'AV FLOW. ;RATIO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 �. 00 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
ILAVESTMENT/C:APACTTY (� /Kw)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED BY
APA RESERVOIR
*�*AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRF ATT PRO/ CF-IN
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO / C:ON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
140
POSSIBLE
ANADROMOUS FISH
NO
SUPPORT
NO OPPOSITION
SUPPORT
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA RAPS
ADV IMP WILL NOTE PREY BLDO OF PRO...I . NOTE A (87 )
APA RESERVOIR
*�*AENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRF ATT PRO/ CF-IN
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO / C:ON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
140
POSSIBLE
ANADROMOUS FISH
NO
SUPPORT
NO OPPOSITION
SUPPORT
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA RAPS
ADV IMP WILL NOTE PREY BLDO OF PRO...I . NOTE A (87 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REOI ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMPTION
04/26/81
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT DAME
LUCK LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
EAGLE
CREEK.
42.9
UNDEVELOPED RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
P'ROJ STATU:3 ; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET FEWER HEAD (FT) 119
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 200
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 3000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL. (MWH) 15000
FEWER STGR/AV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EGUTPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVE STMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
l NVESTMENT , 'rR�AN = M 13S I CiN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIITPLIT($iMWH/YR)
I NVE STh[ENT /C:APAC:I'ry ($IKW )
AV COST OF ti NERGY L $ / MWH i BENEFIT/COS" RATIO {X 100)
COMMENTS: Uses
* ***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC': NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES /RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAU
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER' QUALITY
OTHER TWAT RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
7EDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
;SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
:SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAP
140TE A (,,2' 5 )
K 1 t 1 r .
* ***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC': NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES /RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAU
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER' QUALITY
OTHER TWAT RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
7EDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
;SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
:SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAP
140TE A (,,2' 5 )
K 1 t 1 r .
f
1 1
AKI1 116
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/R1
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
FROUECT NAME
SALMON LAKEAT
/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
SALT CHUCK
liS 85.9
KARTA RIVER
! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRO. STATUS IDENTIFIED SITE
�****EN0I NEER I NG. / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD t FT 89
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CrFS) 459
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) �.000
ENFROY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL, (MWH) 27500
POWER STOR.' AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.52
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, G T RUCTURE&CEN r$1.000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I SS I ON ($1 GO0 )
INVESTMENT/ENE�ROY OIJTP1_IT ($/MWH/"!R )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (*/k.W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
M—***oENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WENTL.ANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR'S
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
rOMMENTS;
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (4 )
M—***oENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WENTL.ANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTOR'S
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
rOMMENTS;
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (4 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
PROJ DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES
KUGEL LADE
55 1.9 /132 15.0
KUGEL CREEK
KL I NKWAN
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I : INDEPENDENT
AK01PAO271
:* *i*CNOINEEDING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS r
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW .,RATIO
ANNUAL PLA14T FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT (a/MWII/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RA'r i o (`G 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
426
70
4000
19000
0
0.54
*M--):;**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL H I LDL I FE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AC•ENCTES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENYTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PROXON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/AirtA MAPS
NOTE t. (77 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE; ALASKA C'OONTY : PRINCE OF MALES EAR I OR I TY s MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
MYRTLE CREEK
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MYRTLE CREEK
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELFC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRE:+J PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROJ DEP/INDEP
I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NPA0256
/1ST 3.8
CE-EO�ELY
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO J STATUS s IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
MEET POWER HEAD
(FT)
ill
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
76
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
1200
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL.
(MWH)
57010
POWER STOR/AV FLOW -RATT0
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
YNYESTMENTFSTRUCTURE&GE�N
($1000)
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPEJT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78
r-**OMENVIRONMENTAL./SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL, WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/COIN
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NO"rE A (36 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALA SKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF MALES PR I OR I TY x MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
N I Bi..AC:K LAKE
LAT/LONG
55 4.9 li 32
CREED
'7.9
�:L I MC�WAN
UNDEVELOPED / RI=S WITH DIVERSION {MCiDIF'IFD )
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
�+i ****F_NG I NEED I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 293
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 64
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 3000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 12526
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.47
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1OOC�)
I NVE'STMENT, TRAM SM I SS T ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($.'MWH/ YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACTTY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENT S x AHR I 73 US CAS
��###ENVIRONMENTAL`/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE' AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
EMVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USES/AF'A MAPS
��###ENVIRONMENTAL`/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIR
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE' AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
EMVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USES/AF'A MAPS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT 14AME
LAT/LON
STREAM NAME
Y
MUNICIPALITY
RFSOURCE TYPE
OWNER
F_LEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRE: J PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROS.# DER' INDEP
x ; 114DEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NPA025'(
UNDEVELOPED ! FEES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO�J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
119
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
170
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
3000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL.
(MWH)
13580
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
U
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
KNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT , `CRANSM I SS I CIN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/C:APAC:ITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 101))
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78 USGS
M��**ENVIRONMEN`I"AL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
JARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL FLUB ATT PROICON
E'NVIR GRP ATT PRO/Cr-'IN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NEC5.9 K rSI,AND LAKE
��°� /ASS 7.`�
NECK ISLAND LAKE
SOURCE, S
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (35 )
U.S. DEFARTMCNT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNYCIPALITY
RESOURCE TYKE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PRCI J DE:P / I NDEP
NHS ID #
REG ION x
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
COUNTY; PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
LADE MARRY
55 6. G / 132 29.0
OLD FRANKS CREEK
SULZER
UNDEVELOPED / TEES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPAO' 5
*-)�E'NGIVEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
FLOW AV AN14L1AL
(CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL.
( MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVESTMENT, S TRUC:TURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT , TRAMSM I SS I ON
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUT(-IJT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST" OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS;
AHRI 78 USGS
**lD: * *ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL
PARKLANDS No
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE: SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRFC ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LITILITV INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
OAK' 121
PROIJ STATUS*
FACTORS
264
240
9600
42300
0
0.5
IDENTIFIED SITE
ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PHS'+ USG S / APA MAPS
NOTE A (79 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REG!ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
U4/26 Sl
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY.. PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PPOJECT NAME
MEI_.LEN LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAK NAME
REYNOLDS CREEKCREEKMUNICIPALITY
CHO
MLE Y
UNDEVELOPED216.0
/ RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO�J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 864
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 62
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 8000
ENERGY PROD CT I+:'�N-ANNUAL (MWH) ��GG00
POWER S TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLAIVT FACTOR 0.42
EOU T PMENT SELECT I ON UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTI.lR &GEN ($1. 000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISS ION ($1Gt�G)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY ill ►TPUT ($/MWH/YR )
I LAVES TMENT,'CAPACI TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )s, BENEFIT/co• RATIO (X lGG)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
***E'NV I RONMENTAE.'SOC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES /RESERV01R S
CULT RESOURQE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENS/ I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS IJSGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (5)
***E'NV I RONMENTAE.'SOC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES /RESERV01R S
CULT RESOURQE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENS/ I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS IJSGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (5)
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RECIION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
REYNOLLiS
CREEK
REYNOLD a CREEK
MLEY
UNDEVELOPED l RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 114
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C'FS) 75
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 11000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 54000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW iRATrO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EQUIPMENT SEL ECT I OP UNITS
INVESTMENT _ STRUCTURF&FEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O tTi'UT ($/MWH/YR )
INVE`�TMENTI�"A AC�1TY ($/KW)
AV COOT OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT /C�: ST RATIO (l( 1 OCR )
COMMENTS: 3 POWER PLANTS AND LAKES INVOLVED AHRI 7E
wh**wENVIRONMENTAL/tiOCIAL ACCEP'T'ASILIT7 FACTORS
PARKLAND NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENTC NO
ES TUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
F I SHER I E a HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RrES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
C:OMMENTO i
NO APPARENT OPPO T I ON
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (109 )
wh**wENVIRONMENTAL/tiOCIAL ACCEP'T'ASILIT7 FACTORS
PARKLAND NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENTC NO
ES TUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
F I SHER I E a HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RrES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
C:OMMENTO i
NO APPARENT OPPO T I ON
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (109 )
: AKI 124
O
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL 'SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY. MEDIUM
PROJECT DAME
SUKKWAN LAKE
L.AT/LONG
STREAM NAME
SUKKWAN LAK
E
45.3
f RES WITH D I VERB I ON ( MOD I FI ED )
PROD STATUS : IDENTIFIED SITE
****4*ENG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 409
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 36
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2300
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (ilWH) 10000
POWER STORi AV FLOW :RATIO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE& EN ($J OOO )
I NVEST MEN`f , TRANC- N I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 140)
COMMENTS: AHR I ?S
*��**iENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIF,L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL MILD/SCENIC NO
EST} �ARIE S/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE: HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
CNVIR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (50 )
*��**iENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIF,L ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL MILD/SCENIC NO
EST} �ARIE S/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE: HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
CNVIR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (50 )
U n S r DEPARTMENT OF FNER 7 i — REG L 0—N X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
G4/20/81
STATE: ALAS KA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SUMMIT
LADE
S4. / 1 33.9
SUMMIT LADE
HCiL.L I S
UNL E�JELOPET� / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUSs IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 39
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 37
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (kw) w) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 9680
POWER STIR/AV FLOWOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL_ PLANT FACTOR .55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVF STMENT , STRUC T} tRE&GEN ($1 C OO )
I LAVES TMENT , TRANS M I SS I UN ($1400)
INVESTMENT/ENHROY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KV! )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
.*�;,��ENV I RONMENTAf_/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILT)/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER. QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDAFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTOERS
FEDERAL/:'STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
'Al< 1 125
. yfr
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (62 )
I
.*�;,��ENV I RONMENTAf_/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILT)/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER. QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDAFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTOERS
FEDERAL/:'STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
'Al< 1 125
. yfr
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (62 )
I
' AKI 126
c
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/G1
STATE: ALASKA
f BOUNTY % PRINCE OF WALE:
PROJECT NAME
THORNE
LAT/LONG
2. 132
STREAM NAME
THORNE
`.i / '� 37. r3
E RIVER
SALT CHUCK
PRIORITY: HIGH
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
NO
PROJ STATUS i IDENTIFIED SITE
�:****FNGINEERTNG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 102
FI-014 AV ANNUAL_ (C':FS) 1518
CAPACITY, INSTAL -LED (KW) 17�: 00
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 80000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.113
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UN I Try
INVESTMENT . ETRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT , TRAN SM I S �'� I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OLJTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES / WETL.ANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO►/ C►�►N
UTILITY INTEREST
APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS
SOURCES
COMMENTS
USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (8 1 )
**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES / WETL.ANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO►/ C►�►N
UTILITY INTEREST
APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS
SOURCES
COMMENTS
USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (8 1 )
AKI 127
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF E14ERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
S TATE a ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
K
LAKAS LAD
f IJE Cr
J
22.9
�..'Y
I;L 11411syWAN
iJNDTVEIWOPFD / RE:S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**H *ENG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET BOWER HEAD (FT) 119
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFI,) 130
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2OO£)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 1.0000
POWER $TOR/AV PLOW :RATIG 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT ► STRUC:TURE&GEN E $1000 )
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST' RATIO (7£ 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 78 US08
#** ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL_ WILDLIFE HAB'
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SI'° fE'"..C. I E;
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT P`RO/C:ON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
N11S USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A £S)
#** ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL_ WILDLIFE HAB'
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SI'° fE'"..C. I E;
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT P`RO/C:ON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
N11S USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A £S)
U , S . DEPARTMENT OF FNERGY -- REG I CAN K
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: PRINCE 4F WALES PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SH i PLEY LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
UNNAMEDMUNICIPALITY
CAPE POLE
30.0
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*' �*u ENG I NE'ER I NCB / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 109
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C FS) 68
CAPACITY, INS'f ALLELE (KW) 1200
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL. (MwH) 4979
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.47
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTURE&GE'N ($1 CyL" 0 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
TNVESTMENT/ENERC,Y OUTPUTOUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ( $/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO ! (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 78 USGS
*w�ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
P'AF" KL.A14DS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDAi�OECED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NA'T RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
EN'VIR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY :INTEREST
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
Nrj-rE A (2.1)
-Kl 128
*w�ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
P'AF" KL.A14DS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDAi�OECED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NA'T RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
EN'VIR GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY :INTEREST
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
Nrj-rE A (2.1)
-Kl 128
i.i. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKINfj INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: PRINCE OF WALES
PROJECT NAME
WATERFALL LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
WATERFALL
!_:'EKE
�S. �' 13� 6.0
PRIORITY: HIGH
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROS. I STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 499
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 16
CAPACITY, I P�STALL EI ► (KW) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 9908
POWER STOR /AV FLOW :RATIO 1.27
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE�:GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($i I`�WH/YR )
I N'�ESTMENT/ CAPAC I'I`Y ($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (;' 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
0***AENVIRONMEN"fAL/S0C'IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC; NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REOR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR #:ARP ATT IRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSTION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS '
NOTE A (63
ij
I
.)-AKI, 129
0***AENVIRONMEN"fAL/S0C'IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC; NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REOR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR #:ARP ATT IRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSTION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS '
NOTE A (63
ij
I
.)-AKI, 129
r
4 " AK 1 130
U.Sr DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: AL.A%*"A
COUNTY;
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LCNr~ /165
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY SCAMMOhi SAY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP To INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #� AK 4NPA4OO�7
SC:AMMON RA # 1,
Y
35.0
STREAM SOUTH Or= VILLAGE
UNDEVELOPED / RUN OF RIVER
PROD STATUS;
�* �** *ENG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
PRIORITY: HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
NET POWER HEAD (FT) Sao
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 9
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 170
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 744
POWER STOR/AV FLOW -RATIO
PLA14T FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT ti ELECT I CAN UNITS
I NV1= STMENT , STRUC:T�_ RE&GEN ($10oo )
I NVE4 TMENT , TRAN SM I S�S I ON S $1 �►00 i
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MwH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 CSC► )
COMMENTS. 1979 PEAK LOAD89 KW SPRINGFEO STREAM
�*`*�*p,)*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/ SCENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TFS
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
NO
NO
STREAM SUPPLIES TOWN WATER SYSTEM
RATED HIGHEST IN BEST SITE CATEGORY BY AVEC
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEC. USES\APA MAPS
REC:OM FCONOMIC\ENG FEAS STUDY FOR FERC LIC
SC:AMMON RA # 1,
Y
35.0
STREAM SOUTH Or= VILLAGE
UNDEVELOPED / RUN OF RIVER
PROD STATUS;
�* �** *ENG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
PRIORITY: HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
NET POWER HEAD (FT) Sao
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 9
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 170
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 744
POWER STOR/AV FLOW -RATIO
PLA14T FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT ti ELECT I CAN UNITS
I NV1= STMENT , STRUC:T�_ RE&GEN ($10oo )
I NVE4 TMENT , TRAN SM I S�S I ON S $1 �►00 i
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MwH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 CSC► )
COMMENTS. 1979 PEAK LOAD89 KW SPRINGFEO STREAM
�*`*�*p,)*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/ SCENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TFS
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
NO
NO
STREAM SUPPLIES TOWN WATER SYSTEM
RATED HIGHEST IN BEST SITE CATEGORY BY AVEC
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEC. USES\APA MAPS
REC:OM FCONOMIC\ENG FEAS STUDY FOR FERC LIC
�*`*�*p,)*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/ SCENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TFS
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
NO
NO
STREAM SUPPLIES TOWN WATER SYSTEM
RATED HIGHEST IN BEST SITE CATEGORY BY AVEC
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AVEC. USES\APA MAPS
REC:OM FCONOMIC\ENG FEAS STUDY FOR FERC LIC
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC- RESOURCE AND B I TF, RANKING INFORMATION
04i26/O1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY:
PROJECT NAME
SCAMMCkN BAY
11:2
�:CAMMC�N BAY
35.0
SPRING FED STREAM B OF VILLAGE
UNDEVELOPED / RUN OF RIVER
PRIORITY: HIGH
PROM STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 500
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 9
CAPACITY, INSTALLED i KW) 285
ENERGY' PRODUCTION -ANNUAL. (MWH) 1248
FLOWER STOR_'AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMEN'T , TRANSM 1 SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTP� �T ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY 0� /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1�" 0 )
COMMENTS: 1979 PEAK LOAD 89 KW
ENVIR(NMENTAL/SC#CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL. /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/COIN
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK 131
STREAM SUPPLIES TOWN WATER SYSTEM
RATED HIGHEST IN BEET SITE CATEGORY BY AVEC
AVEC. USGS\APA MAPS {
RISC ECCkNOMICOENG FEAS STUDY FOR FERC LIC
JI
ENVIR(NMENTAL/SC#CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL. /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/COIN
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK 131
STREAM SUPPLIES TOWN WATER SYSTEM
RATED HIGHEST IN BEET SITE CATEGORY BY AVEC
AVEC. USGS\APA MAPS {
RISC ECCkNOMICOENG FEAS STUDY FOR FERC LIC
JI
. Ears I SP
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION Y,
P'NW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATEe ALASKA
C OUINTY : SEWARD
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
60
STREAM NAMF„
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
P'ROJ CEP/ INDEP'
I i INDEPENDENT
NHS ID ##
AK7NP'AG27S
PRIORITY: HIGH
PROJ STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
**�:*ENGINEERING I ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
979
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
55
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
6000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
29000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUC`TURE&GEN
($1,0 0)
INVESTMENT , TRANSM I SST CAN
($ f 000 )
IN►�ESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR1
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW;
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/C:OST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHRiI 70
*M#�ENVIRONMENTALISOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR
COLT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER LSAT RE.S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
CRESCENT
LAKE 2
`7V. V
{{��
.RY 2-9.o
CRESCENT
LAKE
SAXTON
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS U SG S:' AP A MAPS
NOTE A (42)
U.S. OEPARTMENT OF ENERGY _ REGION X
PNW : SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATEe ALASKA COUNTY: SEWARD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAM
GRANT LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
GRANT LAKE
21.0
}, UNOEVELOPE / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PRO �t STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****EN0 I VEER I Nt3 / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) *50
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:F'S) 193
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (IOW) 8600
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 37776
POWER STOP/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL F'LANT FACTOR .50
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRtUCTURI= &GE'N ($1000 )
I NVE STMENT > 'rRANS M I S S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR!
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (*/E�W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
*r-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES I- CRITICAL WILDLIFE AB
FISHERIES HABgTAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES PUB UB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP' ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL CARP ATT rRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
OPPO S r T I ON UNKNOWN
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (41 )
*r-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES I- CRITICAL WILDLIFE AB
FISHERIES HABgTAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES PUB UB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP' ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL CARP ATT rRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
OPPO S r T I ON UNKNOWN
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (41 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERfa i - REGION r;
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: s ALAS A
COUNTYa SEWARD
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY COOPERS
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRO. DEP / I NDEP I ; INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK6NPA0275
JUNFAU
JtaNEAt.� CREED
LAND I N
�O '. 4 / 1 54.0
CB
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
P`ROJ STATUS:
}.#*#*ENGINEFRING / ECO�NOMTC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT)�
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 111
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) C 000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 62448
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0. �;�i
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
xNVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I t4k,'ESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENINVESTMENT/ENERGYCrUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/ C:APACI"i Y ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY' ($/MWH)
BENEFIT /COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS i AHRI 78 USOS
PRIORITYx HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
��:ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: No
ESTUARIES/WETLAMBS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUTS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION '
YES
NHS USGS/A:PA MAIDS E
NOTE A (36) f
JUNFAU
JtaNEAt.� CREED
LAND I N
�O '. 4 / 1 54.0
CB
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
P`ROJ STATUS:
}.#*#*ENGINEFRING / ECO�NOMTC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT)�
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 111
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) C 000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 62448
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0. �;�i
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
xNVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I t4k,'ESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENINVESTMENT/ENERGYCrUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/ C:APACI"i Y ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY' ($/MWH)
BENEFIT /COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS i AHRI 78 USOS
PRIORITYx HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
��:ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: No
ESTUARIES/WETLAMBS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUTS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION '
YES
NHS USGS/A:PA MAIDS E
NOTE A (36) f
PRIORITYx HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
��:ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC: No
ESTUARIES/WETLAMBS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUTS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION '
YES
NHS USGS/A:PA MAIDS E
NOTE A (36) f
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE i ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG'
STREAM DAME
MLIN I C I PAL I TY
RESOURCE TYPE
r.'tWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRCEJ PURPOSE
PRO.J DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: SE'WARD
LOST I-AKE
60 15.9 /149 22.0
LOST CREED
DIVIDE
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I : INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA0277'
*ENG I NEER I NGi / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW : RAY I O
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVIE.STMENT , STRUCTUPE&OFN ($1000 )
I NV `TMENT, TRANSM I C-SS I CAN ($1 Ot)0 )
INVESTMENT/E'NERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW )
ARC COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEEF T Ti COST RATE' O (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI ?S USGS
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
1388
28
' 000
25()OD
O
0.57
****VENVIRONMENTAL/SOCTAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RE SOORC E SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER MAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/CON
IENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
YES
NHS USES/APA MAPS
CANYON OCCUPIED BY TRANS-ALASKA PIPELINE
NOTE A (6 1 )14HS SAYS NOT AVAIL FOR D►VLMT OF RE S
,..;. AID 1 136
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PMW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SEWARD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/L.ONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
EL.EC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROI J PURPOSE
PROD DEP / I NDEP
NHS ID #
NELL I E JUAN RIVER
60 27.0 /148 47.0
NELLIE UUAN RIVER
CROWN PT
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR (MODIFIED )
HYDROELECTRIC
T : INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA0279
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (C:FS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (YW )
ENERGY PROD13C T I ON -ANNUAL ( MWH )
POWER S TOR/AV FLOW -RATIO
0-INUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUC`I URF.Z0EN ($i.OUO )
INVESTMENT , TRANSM i SS i ON ($1, 000 )
NVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPIJT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRT 75
PROD STATUS:
FACTORS
239
977
10000
47000
a
G . 513
IDENTIFIED SITE
"***ENVTRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WTLD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKE S/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FIS14ERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIE~
WATER QUALITY
OTHER FIAT RE: + AFFEC:TELl
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
.
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UT I L i Ty INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USES/APA MARS
I;I O'f E A (28 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION v
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALAS. KA COUNTY: aEWARD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME..
LAT/LONG
STREAM DAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNED;
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROJ CEP / I NDEP
NHS ID #
WELL I E JUAN RIVER UPPER
60 24.0 /148 49.9
NELLIE JUAN RIVER
MUSKWA VILLAGE
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA0275
PRUJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
,:****:ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
420
FLOW AV ANNUAL_
(CFS)
262
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
12000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
57000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRAMSMISwION
($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPIJT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH
FENEF I T/AGO ST RATIO
()( 100
COMMENTSi
AHRI 78
**O*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR;:
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CUL..T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO /CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
IT I L I TY T NITEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/CPA MAPS
NOTE A (44 )
:AK 1 137
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
P NW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: SEWARD
PREC:-7"V4 }
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
PRIORITY; HIGH
DIVIDE
PTA LAX JECT-
'iJ 15.0 f '7 1 1. 9
PTARMIGAN CREEK
UNDEVELOPED f CUES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO.J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
5****EEG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) :�17
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 138
CAPACITY, INSTALLED wD (Kw) 6025
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON--ANN� SAL (MWH) 52733
POWER STOR: AV FLOW :RATIO D
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.99
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . S RUCTURE&GEN ( � 1000 )
INVESTMENT ,• TRANSM I SS I UN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY C$iMWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1001
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 LIB-;G:S THIS PROD
IS ALT TO PROJECT NPA0274
*E*MENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESORESOURCESITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE: HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO r CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
NATURAL OBST. PREVENTS FISH MIGRATION. ANAD FISH
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS / APA MAPS
DEVELOPMENT FEATS I BL F
NOTE A (68 )
IS ALT TO PROJECT NPA0274
*E*MENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESORESOURCESITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE: HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO r CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
NATURAL OBST. PREVENTS FISH MIGRATION. ANAD FISH
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS / APA MAPS
DEVELOPMENT FEATS I BL F
NOTE A (68 )
` AID 1 t 3S
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUN't'Y: SEWARD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SUNRISE I_AK
P:
51. ' ,� 14 26.9
+UNR I �E:
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRCJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*�**ENCINEERIN% / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 326
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFE) 4183
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 11000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 52000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW sRATTO (I
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION : UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUM :TUBE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMISS ION ($1U£)0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTP'UT($.'MW14/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)'
I tENE'F I T / COST RATIO (X 1 Q0 )
COMMENTS: AHRI TES
a*��*"ENVIRONMENTAL/S0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILE)/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB. ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP- ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL. CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (9 )
a*��*"ENVIRONMENTAL/S0CIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILE)/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE: AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB. ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP- ATT PRO/CONSOCIAL. CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (9 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REo I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTnIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASK A COUNTY: PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT DAME
SHUNGNAK
CREEL
K
/
10.0
RUN OF RIVER
PRO,J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 200
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 100
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (Kw) 1235
FNERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 3245
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO}
ANNUAL,. PLANT FACTOR 0.29
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
T NVEST"IENT , STRUCTURE&ram E:N ($1000 )
INVESTMENT .,TRANSM T % ION ($ 1000 )
!NVESTMENT/ENE:RGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AVCOST OF ENERgY E $/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (a; 1 CAE) )
COMMENTS: 1979 PEAK DEMAND 96 KW
#ee-**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IALr. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS WET AREA
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT BCE S AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
COMMENTS:
t .AK I 140
#ee-**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IALr. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS WET AREA
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT BCE S AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
COMMENTS:
t .AK I 140
AK I i A 1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/c 1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
ANDEA,N LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
ANDEAN CREEK
MUNICIPALITY
Ai..EXANDER
47.2
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 874
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 40
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1 100
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON-kNNUAL (MWH) 'Its 18
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EgU I P'MENT SELECTION Ul-41 TS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO _ (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
**�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
E14DANGE'RED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL -FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEPEST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (27)
**�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
E14DANGE'RED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL -FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEPEST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (27)
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REOI1ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
ANTLER LAKE
LAT/LONG
58
STREAM DAME
ANTLER
RIVER
4C�.' / 1O4 30.0
DOT aC1N LAND 1151G
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS : IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENG I VEER I NO+ / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NE"I" POWER HEAD (FT) 1850
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 40
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 9000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 43000
POWER=TOR/AV FLOW %RATIO Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR fir.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,S�TRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVESTME'NT , TR'AN aM I SS� I CIN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT;ENERGY OIJTPLJT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: ASSUME REGULATION OF 178 BELOW LK ELEV.-LADE
*MENVIRONMENTALISGCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER (QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
AI4ADROMOUS FISH
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS /APA MAPS
NOTE A (73)
COMMENTS: ASSUME REGULATION OF 178 BELOW LK ELEV.-LADE
*MENVIRONMENTALISGCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER (QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
AI4ADROMOUS FISH
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS /APA MAPS
NOTE A (73)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
041 26/81
STATE. AL..ASKA
COUNTY: SITKA
PROJECT NAME
BARANCIF LAKE
LAT/LONG
57
STREAM NAME
B�,RANOF RIVER
MUNICIPALITY
PRIORITY: HIGH
�-�A�eANCF
. c:� / 14 52.9
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED fiITE
***—:;*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 107
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 436
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (k: W) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH ) 11000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.62
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT-STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVESTMENT, TR'ANSMI SSI nN (* 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O«TPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/0APAC-1TY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS; AHRI 78
�,:***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES IRESERVOI RS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER !UAL I T'Y
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP AT*r PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
AK1 143
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS UaGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (28)
�,:***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES IRESERVOI RS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER !UAL I T'Y
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP AT*r PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
AK1 143
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS UaGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (28)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REO I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04 /'26 / 81
STATER ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYRE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PR;OJ PURPOSE
PRO.. £CEP / I NDE P
NHS ID #
COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYi MEDIUM
BAT.)R I N LADE
56 24.0 /134 48.0
SATUR I N CREEK
PORT HERBE.RT
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC:
I: i NDE:PE'NDENT
AK7NPAO? 16
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
MET POWER HEATS
(FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFB)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(v'W,
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH )
POWER STOR!AV FLOW -RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
NVES TMENT , ::'�:TRUC TURE "kN OEN
(141000 ;
I NVE'= TMENT r TRANSM I aS I ON
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWHIYR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($IKW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RAT T O
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78 UE.OS
".�i:*.)r-fNV IRONMENTAL/SOC:I AL
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL_ WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANCERE-D SPECIES
WATER E, UAL I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL !s'rATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT FRCP/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
PROD STATUS a IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
1098
30
1400
543.51
0
4.43
ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
SOURCES NHS USGS / AFA MAPS
COMMENTS% DOTE A (323)
U - S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RFO I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/20' /Si
STATE% ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY% MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
'STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY S
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELF'C UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
RROJ PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #4 AK6NPA0317
UENZEM+AN LAKE
I T�.A
�`� 45. ! 1'5 0.0
I�ENZEMAN R �: VE.R
UNDEVELOPED ! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRO, STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINtEERINC / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 103
FLOW AV ANNUAL (f-FS) 400
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 6323
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL { MWH : 27695
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NE �.�ESI'MENT , STPUCTI_{RE &GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY Of1TPUT(t/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/CO'-T RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AH"�c I 78 U YGS
**: **i E!'�VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA€�
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
E'NVI:R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL OFOP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
SOCKEYE SALMON SPAWN IN RIVER ABOVE LAKE
ALASKA FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPT MIGHT OPPOSE
I
NHS R}SGS/APA MAPS 1
NOTE A (40)
fI1
1
.AK.1 14
UENZEM+AN LAKE
I T�.A
�`� 45. ! 1'5 0.0
I�ENZEMAN R �: VE.R
UNDEVELOPED ! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRO, STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINtEERINC / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 103
FLOW AV ANNUAL (f-FS) 400
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 6323
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL { MWH : 27695
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NE �.�ESI'MENT , STPUCTI_{RE &GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY Of1TPUT(t/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/CO'-T RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AH"�c I 78 U YGS
**: **i E!'�VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA€�
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
E'NVI:R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL OFOP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
SOCKEYE SALMON SPAWN IN RIVER ABOVE LAKE
ALASKA FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPT MIGHT OPPOSE
I
NHS R}SGS/APA MAPS 1
NOTE A (40)
fI1
1
.AK.1 14
**: **i E!'�VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA€�
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
E'NVI:R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL OFOP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
SOCKEYE SALMON SPAWN IN RIVER ABOVE LAKE
ALASKA FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPT MIGHT OPPOSE
I
NHS R}SGS/APA MAPS 1
NOTE A (40)
fI1
1
.AK.1 14
+. , ' ALA ] 146
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/L..ONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROFJ PURPOSE
PRO J DE'P / I NDEP
NHS ID #
COUNTY: S I TKA
BOROD I NO LAKE
56 22.3 / 1: 4 42.9
DIG PORT WALTER FALLS CREED
PORT ARMSTRONG
REG ION X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
PRIORITY% MEDIUM
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA0319
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (OFS)
CAPACIT', INSTALLED (rw)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SEL.EcT i cm UNITS
INVESTMENT, STR'UCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
1NVESTMENT,'ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT /CAPACITY ($ /Kw )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
DENEL= TT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS. AHRI 78 USQS
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
479
66
000
24300
0
0455
*�*A*ENVIRONMENTAL_/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR GRP AT'F PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO / C:ON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCE:
COA' ME.NTS
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (87)
y
. AK 1 14-7
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONO
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEG UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
P%OJ PURPOSE
PROD DEP / I NDEP
Nils I D #
COUNTY: S I TK A
REG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
BLANC:HARD LAKE
56 36.9 / 134 40.0
BL ANC:HARD CREEK
PORT HERBERT
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELFCTRIC
T; INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA031 S
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC:
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
C:APAC:ITY. INSTALLED (Kw)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOP
EQUIPMENT SELECT 1 CAN UNITS
INVESTMENT. STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT , TRAf SM I S S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR. )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY tt-/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X too)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USOS
PRO J STATUS:
FACTORS
389
65
2000
50902
0
2.9
PRIORITY: HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
*MENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULL" RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANDERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
PAIL): T T C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APB; MAPS
NOTE A (237 )
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY •— REG I CAN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
D4/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTYi SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
56
STREAM TAME
MUNICIPALITY
PORT HERLtiERT
�FiE4VTWCQI) [:REE K
. f Ts4 40.0
�REI�TWOOD CREEK
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MOIaIFIED)
PROD STATI18: IDENTIFIED SITE
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 654
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 135
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) SOOt�
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) SSc�DD
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
TMVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1OO�i)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($I000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT /CAPACITY ($IKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIC, 4x 100)
COMMFNTS: AHRI 78
**�NENVIRONMENTAL.i�►OCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC:ENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES; HABITAT
ENDANGEPED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUi3 ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO!C.ON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHSUSGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: DOTE A (98 )
**�NENVIRONMENTAL.i�►OCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC:ENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES; HABITAT
ENDANGEPED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUi3 ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO!C.ON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHSUSGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: DOTE A (98 )
.%"? K1 149
U.S. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: AL.A KA COUNTY: S ITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
DAVID
OF LADE
r cw. 11 4 �0.2
�iAV I L�OF CREEK
PORT HE�6T�EFIT
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENOINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 274
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 85
CAPACITY- INSTALLED (KW) 4426
ENERGY PRODUCTION-ANWUAL (MWH) 19387
POWER STOR/AV FLOW RATIG 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT - 81RUCT� RE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMENT F TRANSM I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTSi AHRI 78
55*oEENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
,OC I AL L�RP ATT F'FiO CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGSIAPA MAPS
COMMENTS: MOTE A (6 )
55*oEENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
,OC I AL L�RP ATT F'FiO CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGSIAPA MAPS
COMMENTS: MOTE A (6 )
t, S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REOI OWN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/2 /81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYe MEDIUM
PROTECT NAME
DEEP
LAVE
t_AT/LONG 56
STREAM NAME DEEP
2.�� /iS4 44.0
BARANOF
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO. STATUS: I DENT I F I EIS SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECO�NOM I C: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 264
FLOW AV ANNUAL, (C:FS) SS
CAPACC I TY . INSTALLED (KW) 1500
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (IyWH) 6174
POWER STOR/AV FLOW aRATIO 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.46
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVEST11ENT STRUCTURE&GEN ($ 000)
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1 OC?U )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTF'UT ($/MWHk- YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY C:A�PAC�ITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ( 1 e MWH )
i3EINEFIT/C:OST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*�*��:EhNVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
--PC#TE:NTTA7ri WiLDT8CFNIC_. _!NC-
ESTUAR I ES /WETi_AINDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA%
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USOS/.SPA MAPS {
COMMENTS: NOTE A (4 ) I
: AK I 150
I
*�*��:EhNVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
--PC#TE:NTTA7ri WiLDT8CFNIC_. _!NC-
ESTUAR I ES /WETi_AINDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HA%
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL.. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USOS/.SPA MAPS {
COMMENTS: NOTE A (4 ) I
: AK I 150
I
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELEC'f R I C RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LATtLONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO,. PURPOSE
PROD DEP/ INDEP
NHS TO #
FINGER LAKE
56 36.1 / 134 41.3
FINGER CREED
PORT HERSERT
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH D I VERB I ON ( MOD I F I Er D )
HYDROELECTRIC
1; t NDEPENDE:NT
AK7NPA4327
PRO,J STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****.ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
739
FLOW AV ANNUAL_
t. CFS)
26
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
3000
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL
(MWH)
14000
POWER $TOR/Ate FLOW :RATIO
O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.53
EOUTPMENT SELEcTTON
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&%EN
($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISwION
($1000l
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(y 100)
COMMENTS:
AHR I 78
q��yy
*��W�:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
E STUAR I ES/WETLANDS
#"'ECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT FARO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS;
NHS USIA S / AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (73)
U.B. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGTESN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
Fi 1RUHELM
.€1 11S4 48.0
FURUHELM RIVER
NEW PORT WtLTER
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION ( MOD I F I Eli )
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG 56
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
RROJ DEP / I NDEP E a DEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0329
PRCIU STATUS, IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTOR'S
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 99
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 200
CAPACITY, INSTALLED ( KW) 3000
ENEmRGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 1331,13
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL_ PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT , TRAN SM I SS I CAN ($1 OC�0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF FNER1.Y ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: UVLMT WITH SATURIN LK NPA0316 AHRI
��*}'*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS DS NO
POTEN'r I AL W I LD! SCEN I C NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER MAT RE S AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON1 rNV I R GRP ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK 1 152
POSSS ISLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (61 )
78 U aG S
PRCIU STATUS, IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTOR'S
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 99
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 200
CAPACITY, INSTALLED ( KW) 3000
ENEmRGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 1331,13
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL_ PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT , TRAN SM I SS I CAN ($1 OC�0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF FNER1.Y ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: UVLMT WITH SATURIN LK NPA0316 AHRI
��*}'*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS DS NO
POTEN'r I AL W I LD! SCEN I C NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER MAT RE S AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON1 rNV I R GRP ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK 1 152
POSSS ISLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (61 )
78 U aG S
��*}'*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS DS NO
POTEN'r I AL W I LD! SCEN I C NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER MAT RE S AFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON1 rNV I R GRP ATT PRO/ CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK 1 152
POSSS ISLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (61 )
78 U aG S
AK 1 153 �4 �
(J. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATIOhl
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: Si'i KA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
G OULD I NG LAKE
LAT/LONG
57 48.3 /136
STREAM NAME
GOULDINO LAKE
MUNICIPALITY
K I MSHAM COVE
RESOURCE TYPE
UNDEVELOPED /
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/ I NDFP
E: DEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK7NPA033 9
UPPER
12.9
RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
*tee***ENG I VEERING :" ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ;RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSMI S SION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENEROY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 GO )
COCIMENTS: LOWER GOULDING
PRO,J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
122
270
9000
41000
0
0.52
SITE AHR I 78 USCS
*�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS POSSIBLY IN NATIONAL INTEREST WILDERNEz:S LAND
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT-RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
F_.NVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT FARO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: DEVELOPMENT IMPROBABLE
"TOTE A (64) LOWER COULD I NG SITE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENFRGY -
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND
04/26/81
STATE: ALA SKA
PROJECT DAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUN,T.CIP'ALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO.. PURPOSE
PROD DEP / T ND P
NHS ID .##
COUNTY: S I TK A
KASNYKLI LAKE
57 11.0 /134 49.9
KASNYk,LI FALLS (::REF,.V,
PORT AL.EXANDER
UNDEVELOPED / RES
HYDROELECTRIC:
I : INDEPENDENT
AK7NPA0335
REGION X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
WITH DIVERSION(MOOIFIED�
**ENOI NEER I NO / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW Air ANNUAL (CFS )
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL ( MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTME:NT, STRUC TURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT_TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($.`MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($I W)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMME14 i"S: AHRI 78 USG:
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
50
70
7000
30000
0
0.48
*�****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LAMES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HATS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS IJS GS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (93 )
Dw..
AK 1r14
1
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REOI ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE. ALASKA
COUNTY: S I TKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
PORT i-iFI�LEF�T
MAISOUTOF RIVER
fir_ 30.0 /1'S4 57.9
MA'SOUTOF RIVER
PRIORITY: HIGH
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATIJSc IDENTIFIED SITE
,.srw* *ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 569
FLOW AV ANNUAL (Cr=S) 375
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 4000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 117000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURF&GEN ( 1GCVO)
INVESTMENT, TRANSMI SSICAN ($1£BOO )
INV STMENT/ENE'RGY OUTPUT'($/MWH./YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY TY (:;/il W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RA'f':i o (X 100)
COMMENTS: APS 76 DATA PE 50
*K��:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS tliO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE' AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USCS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (163 )
AK 155
*K��:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS tliO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE' AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USCS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (163 )
AK 155
AKI 156
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
FROJECT NAME
PULP
MILL
MEDVETCHA
I-rr.A
7.0
UNT�EVELCiF'ED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
***,**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 209
FLOW AV ANNUAL €CFS, 53
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1500
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 7400
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EOLI I PME 4T SELECTION UN T. TS
INVE STMEWT . STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVES'rMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YID)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENEROY ($/MWH)
BENF:F I T / COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS; AHRI 78
**o*ENVIRQNMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERLAKES/RESERVOIRSSITES
CULT RESOURCE
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP-ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (41)
**o*ENVIRQNMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERLAKES/RESERVOIRSSITES
CULT RESOURCE
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP-ATT FRO/CON
SOCIAL CRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (41)
IJ - S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REr I ON X
PNW MALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: OITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONQ 56
STREAM NAME MILK
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER ; DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/TNDFP It INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0294
MILK I..AKE
CREEK
�; !134 47.0
DARANOF
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION ( MOLD I F I ED )
P'ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENG I VEER I NO I ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 665
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF s) 230
CAPACITY: INSTALLED (KW) 7000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (;�WH) 33000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT- TRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
TMVESTMENTFTRANSMIGSION ($1004)
ThIVE' TMENT/E=NEROY OL.ITPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMEINVESTMENT/CAPACITY($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
PBE.NEF'� T/CCU -r RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR.I 78
* UE NV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS E40
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NEAT RE'S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIE:S
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREs'r
SOURCES
C OMMEN*rs:
AK 1 157
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USG; /APA MAPS
NOTE A (99)
MILK I..AKE
CREEK
�; !134 47.0
DARANOF
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION ( MOLD I F I ED )
P'ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENG I VEER I NO I ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 665
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF s) 230
CAPACITY: INSTALLED (KW) 7000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (;�WH) 33000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT- TRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
TMVESTMENTFTRANSMIGSION ($1004)
ThIVE' TMENT/E=NEROY OL.ITPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMEINVESTMENT/CAPACITY($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
PBE.NEF'� T/CCU -r RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHR.I 78
* UE NV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS E40
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NEAT RE'S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIE:S
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREs'r
SOURCES
C OMMEN*rs:
AK 1 157
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USG; /APA MAPS
NOTE A (99)
* UE NV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS E40
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NEAT RE'S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIE:S
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREs'r
SOURCES
C OMMEN*rs:
AK 1 157
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USG; /APA MAPS
NOTE A (99)
s
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04 /26 / 81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME NAl" VASE I N LAKE
LAT/LONG 56 27.0 /134 44.0
STREAM NAME NAKVAS S I N CREEK
MUNICIPALITY PORT HERRERT
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP / I NDE P I : INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID # AK7NPA0295
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
174
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
66
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
1SOo
ENERG%' PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
7689
POWER STOP/AV FLOW :RATIO
4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.48
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITE
INVESTMENT . STRUC:TI iRE&GEC!
($1000 )
INVESTMENT.TRANSMISSICAN
($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY DIJTPU"f($/MWH/YID)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
VENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHR I 78
*,7�:N*�ENV.IRONMENTrAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
F'NUANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOCKEYE SALMON SPAWNING GROUND
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (42)
�.1. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I CAN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RIFSGURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELF'C UTYLITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
OSPREY LAKE
56 24.0 / 1134 40.0
NEW PORT WALTER CREEK
PORT HERBERT
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
Ia INDEPFNDENT
AK7NPAG2v7
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (k;W )
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH)
POWER STOR/AV FLOW %RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVFSTMENT,STRUCTURE&:GEN ($1000)
I NVE8TMENT, TRANSM I SS I Oil ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY q.[JTPUT($/MWH/YR'f
INVESTMENT /CAPAC I T's' ($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 OG )
COMMENTSi AHRI 78
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
251
2000
9260
0
0.52
****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
S
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (52)
Alai 159
AK 1 160
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYi MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME. PARRY LADE
LAT/LONG 56 39.0 / 134 41.0
STREAM TAME PARRY CREEK
MUNICIPALITY PORT HERBERT
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD LIEF' / I NDEP I : INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS T D # AK " NPAC 298
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET PLOWER HEAD
(FT)
374
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
5�6
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
5000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
23967
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/LAW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
AHRI 75
**#M:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:TAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POI.. I T I CAL FAC:TORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR.GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT FRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCE'S
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (?S)
U.F. DEPARTMENT ARTMENT OF ENERGY - REl z 1 CAN X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE; "tLASKA Caum'I•Y : S I TKA PR I aR I TY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
RaST1 SI_aF i_AK
E
HERE:ERT
41.3
RUST I' LaF CREEK
UNDEVELOPED ! RE E WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS„ IDENTIFIED SITE
*�**ENGINEER'ING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
IJET POWER HEAD (FT) 549
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) SI
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (I �W) 6e 1 S
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 9842
POWER $TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0:ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVESTMENiT . `STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 �7Ua )
INVESTMENT , TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YID)
INVESTMEN'r/CAPACITY ($/IOW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X loci)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
KO*AENVIRONMENITAL/SOCIAL. ACGEPTAL�ILI'fY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOC.I AL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCC S
CC' VIME'NI'rs :
NO KNOWN OPPOSITION$
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (63)
KO*AENVIRONMENITAL/SOCIAL. ACGEPTAL�ILI'fY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOC.I AL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCC S
CC' VIME'NI'rs :
NO KNOWN OPPOSITION$
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (63)
+ Ak i 162
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/Si
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYi MEDIUM
PROJECT JE'CT DAME
RUST LAKE 2LAT/
LONG
STREAM NAME
RUST CREEKCREEKMUNICIPALITY
KIMSHAN COVE
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC� UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROe1 DEP/INUFP
D: DEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK6NPA0306
59.0
UNDEVELOPED t RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROtiJ S TATUS o IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
732
FLOW AV AN14UAL
(r F S)
70
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)c
000
ENERGY PRODLICT I ON —ANC UAL
(MWH)
341.60
POWER STOR/AV FLOW : RAT ICE
Q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.48
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
TNVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000)
INVESTMENT , TRANSM I SS I ON
($ 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($ / KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/CAST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
PARTIALLY
DEVELOPED SIMMONS CREEK AHRI
*#-i*:*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE_ SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER OLIALYTY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
PUB ATT PROXON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
PROPOSED NATIONAL PRESERVE BOUNDARY
78 USCS
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS LISCS/APA MAPS
NOTE: A ( 9 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
O4/26/S1
STATE: AL,.ASKA COUNTY: S I TKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPFR
PROD PURPOSE
PRQJ DEP/ I. NOEP
NHS ID #
SASHIN LAKE
56 21.3 r' 1 S4 41.3
SASHIN CREEK
NEW PORT WALTER
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFTED )
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7NPAQ308
PROJ STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
439
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(C FS)
37
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
2500
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL
(MWH.
10867
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
O
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURF&GEN
($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSM I SS I ON
($1 O0G )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/`,'R )
INVESTMENT / CAPAC I T`e
($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MW-f )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHR I 78
***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL. /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL_ f.RP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
AK 1 163
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (62)
0
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REG I Oi l X
P WW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: SITKA
PROJECT NAME
PORT ARMSTR.ONG
ry 17.' ! 1 4 39. 4
SHEGk;LEY CREEK
PURT ARMSTt�OfidG
PRIORITY; HIGH
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PRO _t STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 269
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 87
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (VW) 3500
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON� ANNUAL � MWH) 15782
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
I NVESTMi NT, TRANSM I `SS I ON ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O1-JTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
C►�MMENTS» AHRI 73
*K—*A*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/'WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANCERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY,
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUP ATT PROYCON
ENV I R CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL_ GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS I JSGS/APA NAPS
NOTE A (60 )
*K—*A*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/'WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANCERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY,
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUP ATT PROYCON
ENV I R CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL_ GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS I JSGS/APA NAPS
NOTE A (60 )
I.I.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ._ RE0I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANK I NO INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: SITKA
PROJECT NAME
TAK
Arx CREED
TAKATZ CREED:
�7 / 15�4 51.0
DE�RAL�dC�F
PRIORITY: HIGH
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PRO.J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
�: *-�:*EW0I VEER X NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 990
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CPS) I -SO
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 20000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 97000
POWER STOP[/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . c ► RUC:TURE&GEN ($1 OG�t )
I LAVES `� MENT , TRANSM I SS I+.N ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPUT %$/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (Va/��W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($. MWH )
DENE:FIT/CO qT RATIO t'X 100)
COMMENTS. APA 1968 TAKATZ CREEK REPORT
*i*ENV I RONMENTAL /; HOC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORSPARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
E STIJARI ES/ WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSx
NO
NO
NO SIGNIFICANT AFFECT BY CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
RECOMMENDED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
ADMINISTRATION SUPPORTS CONSTRUCTION
NOTE A (11 1 )
� ; AFC 1 165
*i*ENV I RONMENTAL /; HOC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORSPARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
E STIJARI ES/ WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSx
NO
NO
NO SIGNIFICANT AFFECT BY CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
RECOMMENDED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
ADMINISTRATION SUPPORTS CONSTRUCTION
NOTE A (11 1 )
� ; AFC 1 165
• AI{:1 166
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL :SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALAS IAA COUNTY: S I TKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME.
CLIFF LADE
!-iERDERT
r5 1. 1w4 45.9
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS, IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 127
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFv) 89
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (IOW) 100
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 7584
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
71 VESTMENT - S TRUC•TURE&GEN ($1 OOC3 )
I NVESTMENT r TRANSM I SS I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($1KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMFNTS: AHRI 7E
00"AAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE }RCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO / COi��
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
/ CON
UTILITY INTEP`EST
NO APPARE14T OPPOSITION
SOURCES
S
COMMENTS:
NHS i, SOS/APA MAPS
MOTE A (37 )
00"AAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
RESOURCE }RCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R CARP ATT PRO / COi��
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
/ CON
UTILITY INTEP`EST
NO APPARE14T OPPOSITION
SOURCES
S
COMMENTS:
NHS i, SOS/APA MAPS
MOTE A (37 )
I . S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REO I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYi MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG 56
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TTYPEOWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD P'URPUSF HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0525
DEER LADE
i«7 /i54 40.0
UNNAMED PARANCE I SL.
PORT HERI�ERT
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION (M '-ID I F I ED )
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENOINEFRINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) SS£�
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 160
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 7000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON —ANNUAL (MWH) 31,000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW : RAT.I:O p's
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR Gw
EQUIPMENT SELECTION LAN I'rs
114VESTMENT,STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000)
t NYE STMENT r TRANSM I SS I ON ($1 DE)E7 )
INVESTMENINVESTMENT/ENERGYCtIJTPIJT($/I'�IWI�I/YR)
INVESTPIENT/CAPACITY (bbIKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY (a�.� MWH )
SENEF I T ACO°� T RAT T O (X 100 )
COMMENTS: APS 76 DATA PF>50 AHRI 75
*Kw-a*�:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /;:STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
LNVTR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOI.JRCFS
COMMENTS:
>K1 367
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE (69 )
f
rl
DEER LADE
i«7 /i54 40.0
UNNAMED PARANCE I SL.
PORT HERI�ERT
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION (M '-ID I F I ED )
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENOINEFRINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) SS£�
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 160
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 7000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON —ANNUAL (MWH) 31,000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW : RAT.I:O p's
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR Gw
EQUIPMENT SELECTION LAN I'rs
114VESTMENT,STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000)
t NYE STMENT r TRANSM I SS I ON ($1 DE)E7 )
INVESTMENINVESTMENT/ENERGYCtIJTPIJT($/I'�IWI�I/YR)
INVESTPIENT/CAPACITY (bbIKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY (a�.� MWH )
SENEF I T ACO°� T RAT T O (X 100 )
COMMENTS: APS 76 DATA PF>50 AHRI 75
*Kw-a*�:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /;:STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
LNVTR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOI.JRCFS
COMMENTS:
>K1 367
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE (69 )
f
rl
*Kw-a*�:ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL /;:STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
LNVTR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOI.JRCFS
COMMENTS:
>K1 367
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE (69 )
f
rl
-�` AK 1 168
o t;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE:: ALASKA COUNTY: S I TKA PR I GR I TY o MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
nxANA LAKE
STREAM NAME
3.0
UNNAMED
A
UNDEVELOPED ! RE:S W ? TH D I VERS T ON ( MOD I F I ED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*** FNGINEERIMO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1473
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 36
CAPACITY, I NS TAi. LED (KW) SOC�0
ENEPOY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 35000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW .RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION .NITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTUR0, 0EN ($1000 )
I NVE rTMENT :TRANSMISSION ($1 UOC� )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY CJIJTPi tT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY i $ltew )
AV COST OF ENERGY (t?/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO E X 1 O0 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USOS
�V:*�i*ENVIROWMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I LIi.` SC:EN I C: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR OOP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS iJSGSIAPA MAPS
NOTE A ( 1 G9 )
�V:*�i*ENVIROWMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I LIi.` SC:EN I C: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR OOP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONPRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS iJSGSIAPA MAPS
NOTE A ( 1 G9 )
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG7ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME FOUR FALLS LAKE
LAT/LUNG 57 1.9 /134 45.9
STREAM NAME UNNAMED
MUNICIPALITY SARANOF
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I: INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID # AK7NPA0328
*****ENGIVEERINO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
1348
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
23
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(Kw)
4'_540
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
20000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVE STMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
(*1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUIPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACI`rY
($/KW;
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 1 CAD )
COMMENTS:
AHRY 78
*r�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S;TTES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAG
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVTR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (72)
i
,Alai. 169
AK 1 17 0
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION v
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: SITKA
PROJECT NAME
HTDDEN FALLS L
LAT/LONO
57 13.0 /134
STREAM NAME
UNN AMED CREEK
MUNICIPALITY
BARANOF
RESOURCE TYPE
UNDEVELOPED
OWNED
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/TNDEP
1: YNDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK6NPA033,1
AKES
51 2. 9
RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS:
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
494
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
106
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
8000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
36277
POWFR STCIR/AV FLOW :RATIO
(I
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVEGTMENT-STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000)
TNVESTMEN'r,TRANSMISSION
('�-1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ".$/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($IKW)
A') COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 106)
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78
PRIORITY.- HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
V*r--)**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIEl':"-/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE !RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NIT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (97)
{
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
UNNAMEDMUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP
D: DEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK64PAGSS�+
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
�r****ENO T NEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
904
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(GFS)
33
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
4500
E14ERGY PRODUCT i ON --ANNUAL
(MWH)
19882
POWER STOR/Aks FLOW :RATIO
D
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000)
I NVESTMEN"f , TRANSM I SS I CAN
($1 ODC� )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O}JTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
TNVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT /COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS s
AHR I 78. USOS
***a**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL_ WILL)/ SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
C�HrIDDEN FALLS I—AKE UPPER
.�I 13.0 / i ""T 52.5
DARANC)F
UNDEVELOPED RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USES/APA MAPS
LOWER HIDDEN FALLS SITE. NOTE A (98)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
KELPLA
T /LONG
STREAM RAMIE
UNNAMED
I Tk(A
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*-;*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 611
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 222
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1 000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 66000
POWER tiTOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.47
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, =TRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 5
INVESTMENT - *rRANSM .F S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENF;ROY € UTPIJT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACTT`� ($/i'W )
AV COST OF ENERGY S $/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (x 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI iG
* K-mENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHE=HIES HABITAT
E:NDANC-ERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE ;ERAL /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS r
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (6 1 )
AID 1 172(D
* K-mENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHE=HIES HABITAT
E:NDANC-ERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE ;ERAL /STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS r
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (6 1 )
AID 1 172(D
f AK1 173 +
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG 56
STREAM NAME UNNAMEDMUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELECT UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRCIJ DEP/ INDEP I : INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA033-1
!_AKE SKATER I NA
. =" ! 3.3
SITh;A
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**** �E14G I NEED I NO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) S1
PLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 86
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 4500
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQU I PMEi'lT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, TR CTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMISSION ($:1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY 4U'TPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILLS/SC~ENIC., NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC.'•R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT PIES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP ATT PRO/C:CEN
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSS T ISLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
Ll
SOURCES
C OMMr.NTS:
NHS USES/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (21 )
!_AKE SKATER I NA
. =" ! 3.3
SITh;A
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**** �E14G I NEED I NO / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) S1
PLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 86
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 4500
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQU I PMEi'lT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, TR CTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMISSION ($:1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY 4U'TPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ / MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILLS/SC~ENIC., NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC.'•R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT PIES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP ATT PRO/C:CEN
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSS T ISLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
Ll
SOURCES
C OMMr.NTS:
NHS USES/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (21 )
****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILLS/SC~ENIC., NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC.'•R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT PIES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP ATT PRO/C:CEN
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSS T ISLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
Ll
SOURCES
C OMMr.NTS:
NHS USES/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (21 )
iJ. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REG T ON X
PNW SMALL SCAT_ E HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
I_AK
PROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 910
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 15
CAPACITY, INSTALLED flew) 1905
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH) 9479
POWER STD"#R/AV FLOW :RATIO b
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UN I T:3
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&OEM# ($1000)
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I S I t)N ($10OC� )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O{JTPIJT ($,'MWH/YR )
I NVESTNENT /C:APAC:I TY ( $/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 104)
COMMENTS; AHRI 73 USGS
0�* V "ENV I RONMENTAL I S#�C I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I t-b/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALT
F I S HER I ES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ,ATT PRO/CON
ENV'IR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTERES'r
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NIAS IJ8G / APA MAPS
NOTE A (47)
E r. R I NA
,�� �.►r i ! Sys 7.9
UNNAMED
'�ITKA
UI�IDEVELCIPED ! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
AK 1 174 (1
0�* V "ENV I RONMENTAL I S#�C I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL W I t-b/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALT
F I S HER I ES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ,ATT PRO/CON
ENV'IR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTERES'r
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NIAS IJ8G / APA MAPS
NOTE A (47)
E r. R I NA
,�� �.►r i ! Sys 7.9
UNNAMED
'�ITKA
UI�IDEVELCIPED ! RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
AK 1 174 (1
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REO I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYs MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/ I NDEP I : I NDE:P 5NDENT
NHS ID # AK6NPA0296
PROS.! STATUS: I DENT T F I ED SITE
*****ENO I NEER I NO 1 ECONOMIC' FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 439
FLOW AV ANNUAl- (CFS) 85
CAPAC:ITYr INSTALLED (KW) 5600
ENERGY PROI: UCTION-ANNUAL (MWH) 24800
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVE aTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY 1$/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ( MWH)
DE'NEF I T / COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*#15*ENVIRONMENTAL/SDCIAL, ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT FEES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC: I E S
LOCALLOCALPUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO) XON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NELSON LAME
i�ARANO�'
rya 56.0 l 1 C�t4 45.0
UNNAMEDUNiiE:VE�. UNDEVELOPED r RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USO S/APA MAPS
NOTE A (S 1 )
PROS.! STATUS: I DENT T F I ED SITE
*****ENO I NEER I NO 1 ECONOMIC' FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 439
FLOW AV ANNUAl- (CFS) 85
CAPAC:ITYr INSTALLED (KW) 5600
ENERGY PROI: UCTION-ANNUAL (MWH) 24800
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVE aTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY 1$/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ( MWH)
DE'NEF I T / COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*#15*ENVIRONMENTAL/SDCIAL, ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT FEES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC: I E S
LOCALLOCALPUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO) XON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NELSON LAME
i�ARANO�'
rya 56.0 l 1 C�t4 45.0
UNNAMEDUNiiE:VE�. UNDEVELOPED r RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USO S/APA MAPS
NOTE A (S 1 )
*#15*ENVIRONMENTAL/SDCIAL, ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT FEES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC: I E S
LOCALLOCALPUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO) XON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NELSON LAME
i�ARANO�'
rya 56.0 l 1 C�t4 45.0
UNNAMEDUNiiE:VE�. UNDEVELOPED r RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USO S/APA MAPS
NOTE A (S 1 )
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGIOLD x
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDPOEL! :'fir"i R I C: RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ,LASKA COUNTY: a s I TKA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
POINT
SULLIVAN
UNNAMED
E
UNDEVELOPED1919
/ RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROWL aTATUS a IDENTIFIED SITE
s****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC` FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1448
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFG) 10
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2000E.
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 9653
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVEBTMENT.STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMEN'r, TRANSMI SSION ($1000 )
TNVE'ETHENT/ENERGY CIJTPIJT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / }:`W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (x 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USOG
�*i �*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL.. WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (70)
AID I. 176
�*i �*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL.. WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (70)
AID I. 176
AID 1 177
U- S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REG I ON X
PNW SMAt-L SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATEt ALASKA COUNTY: SITKA PRIORITYx MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
REDOUBT
LADE
A
15.5
UNNAMED CA�ADE
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / FCONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 20
FLOW AV ANNUAL (i FS) 286
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (kW) 1600
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 7049
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR .50
EOUIPMFrNT SELECTION UNITS
INVESI'MENT,STRUC'i'URE&OE'N ($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
mvEsTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT /CAPACITY ($ /KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
i*o***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLAND{G
RECR LAKE:/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIE:
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTEZ
NHS USGS/AAA MAP'
NOTE A (13)
i*o***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLAND{G
RECR LAKE:/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIE:
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTEZ
NHS USGS/AAA MAP'
NOTE A (13)
U.S. DEPARTMEMT OF ENERGY - RE010N X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COLINTYi SITKA
PROJECT NAME
GREEN LAKE
LAT/LONG
57 01.0 /135
STREAM NAME
VODOPAD RIVER
MUNICIPALITY
SITKA
RESOURCE TYPE
UNDEVELOPED
OWNER
CITY OF SITKA
ELEC UTILITY
CITY OF SITKA
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/YNDEP
1: INDEPENDENT
NHS I 0
AK7NPA0332
PRIORITYi HIGH
21.0
RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
/ ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
344
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
2701
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
16600
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
01WH'i
64000
POWER srOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.44
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNi'rs
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY 0l.JTPUT($;�'MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION BY CITY OF SITKA
**�**V.-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
NO
RECR LAKES/RFSERVOIRS
NO
CULT RESOURCE SITES
NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
NO
FISHERIES HABITAT
NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
NO
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
-11
rAKA 178
YES
NHS. USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(82)
r
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
FNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: AL.ASI-.A COUNTY: SITKA PRIOR;TY: MEDIUM
PROTECT TAME
LAT/LONG 57
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRQJ DEP/INDEP I. INDEPENDENT
NHS T D # A4NPA0307
SADIE
4. f134 48.9
WAXMAN CREEK
BARANOF
t iNI7E'1ELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**—A* ENO I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 464
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF:S) 35
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (KW) 2500
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 10835
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNIT:
T MVESTMENI'. STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 G0D )
I NVESTMENT r TRAiNISM I SS I ON ($10Gt) )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / KW )
AV COST t �F ENERGY ($ /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RA_T I O (X 1 DU )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
*Mco�*ENVIRONMENTAsL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY "ACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RE; EPVOI RS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL! STAeTE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LIT'[ L I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS%
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS / APA MAPS
NOTE A (62)
AK 179
SADIE
4. f134 48.9
WAXMAN CREEK
BARANOF
t iNI7E'1ELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**—A* ENO I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 464
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CF:S) 35
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (KW) 2500
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 10835
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNIT:
T MVESTMENI'. STRUCTURE&GEN ($1 G0D )
I NVESTMENT r TRAiNISM I SS I ON ($10Gt) )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ / KW )
AV COST t �F ENERGY ($ /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RA_T I O (X 1 DU )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
*Mco�*ENVIRONMENTAsL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY "ACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RE; EPVOI RS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL! STAeTE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LIT'[ L I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS%
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS / APA MAPS
NOTE A (62)
AK 179
*Mco�*ENVIRONMENTAsL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY "ACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RE; EPVOI RS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL! STAeTE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP' ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LIT'[ L I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS%
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS / APA MAPS
NOTE A (62)
AK 179
U.S. DFPARTME'NT OF ENERGY -- REF41 ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATEx ALASKA
COUNTY-. SKAGW►AY—YA►KUTAT
PROJECT NAME
DAYEBAS CREEK
LAT / 1—ONG
STREAM NAME
DAYEBAS CREEK
CHI LKO
O1'
UNDEVELOPED ! RON OF RIVER
PROD STATUS p
**** ENG I NELw R I i+. O / ECONOMIC FACTORS
PRIORITY: LOW
IDENTIFIED SITE
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 344
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:F.S) 85
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 5UUC�
ENERGY PRODUCT x ON —ANNUAL (MWH) 18190
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO U,
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.4.1 i
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&OEN ($1C#C�0) 1.6022
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION ($1 OOU) 600
INVESTMENT/ENERGY 0UTPUT($/MWH/YR) 914 f
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW) 3324
AV COST OF ENERGY ($IMWH) 6$
DENEF I Tl�:��' ST RATIO (X IOU ) 29
COMMENTS: STREAM USED IN PAST TO POWER SAWMILL
0**�*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCESITES
i
CRITICAL.. WILDLIFE HAS POSSIEL_E J
FISHERIES HABITAT NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES f
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS {
FEDERAL./STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL L� UD ATT PRO/ CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LITILITY INTEREST YES JI
SOURCES NHS USO'S/APA MAPS al
COMMENTS: DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDED BY STATE AGENCY AFA
NOTE A (SU)
AKI
180
w 1
'D
AKI 181 �
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW. SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04 / 6/81
STATE: AL4SKA COUNTY: SKACWAY—YAKUTAT PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT DAME
KOOK LAK
E
CHAThiAM
59.0
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 159
FLOW AV A14NUAL (C:FS) 150
C:APAC I TY e INSTALLED (KW' 1000
ENERGY PRODUCTION-�-ANNUAL (MWH) 6()00
POWER STCIR/AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.68
EQU I PMEN"r SELECTION LIN I TS
IMVESTMENT-STRUCT• RE&OEN ($1.000)
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/1=NEROY OUTPUT($/MWH/YID)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT /COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 7S
� ****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICWILD/SCENICESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED S PFC I E S
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFEAFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE"
SOURCES
COMMENTSt
NHS USGS/ARA MAPS
No*rE A (2 )
� ****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENICWILD/SCENICESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED S PFC I E S
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE S AFFEAFFECTEDPOLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE"
SOURCES
COMMENTSt
NHS USGS/ARA MAPS
No*rE A (2 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKINO INFORMATION
O4/26/SJ.
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY; SKAGWAY--YAKUTAT PR I OR I TYn MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME PELICAN
LAT/LONG 57 57.2 / 1Sf_ 12.9
STREAM NAME PELICAN COVE CREED
MUNICIPALITY SUNNYSIL'E PELICAN LOGGING CAMP
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP 1: INDEPENDENT PROJ STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID # AK7NPA0348
*,:***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
120
FLOW AV ANNUAL_
(CFS)
al
CAFACITY� INSTALLED
(KW)
1500
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
6270
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
.00
ANNUAL.. PLANT FACTOR
0.47
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
TNVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR
)
INVES'L'MENT/CAP'AC3TY
($/LAW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/NWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78 ALTERNATE TO NP'A0346
*K-PENVTRONMENTAL/SOCIAL- ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDA14GERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITTCAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL- PUB ATT PRO."CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NI --IS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (33) SOME TYPE OF EXISTING RESERVOIR
AKI 182
J AK I 183
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SKAGWAY-YAKUTAT PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
GOAT LAKE
CL I F'E`GN
51.E /1:� 11.0
PITCHFORK FALLS
UNDEVELOPED t RES WITH D I VERS I.ON ( MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
* ENGINEER)'NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1868
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 29
CAPACITY, I NS'CAL.L.Erl (KW) 10000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 46000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0.
AN14UAL PLANT FACTOR 0.52
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW)
AV LOST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: RECON CH I LKAT RIVER BASIN REGION CH2M HILL i 980
Koo:*KENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC*ENIC� NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES /RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE URCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAG
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
F .�L. a T I GAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
ii
LOCAL Pi ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSTION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS- Ud GS/APA MAPS
NOTE A, (7 4 )
Koo:*KENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC*ENIC� NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES /RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE URCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAG
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
F .�L. a T I GAL. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
ii
LOCAL Pi ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO /CON
SOCIAL. GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSTION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS- Ud GS/APA MAPS
NOTE A, (7 4 )
i �. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE. AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26!S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: SKAGWAY--YAKUTAT PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SI:TK
OH LADE
OH CREED
4.9
► iN�FVEI_C1='EI"� i RES WITH DTVERSIGN (MOrjIFIELF )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**%*ENG I NFER I NC / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 185
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 48
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1400
ENERGY PRODUCT T ON -ANNUAL � MWH) 6010
POWER STOR,3AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLAIT FACTOR 0.49
EOU I PMENT _-:ELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPIJT %$/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW )
AV UU=T OF ENERGY ($IMWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI ?S
'***r-->ENV I RONMENTAL / OC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
POTENTIAL WILTS/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE. HALE POSS I ELE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE a AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PAS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP' ATT PRO/CONSOC: I AL GRP ATT PRO/CON NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (24)
AKI. 184 I
0� 01
POTENTIAL WILTS/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE. HALE POSS I ELE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RE a AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PAS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP' ATT PRO/CONSOC: I AL GRP ATT PRO/CON NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (24)
AKI. 184 I
0� 01
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNT': SKAUWAY--YAKLITAT
PROJECT NAME
L.AT/LONG+
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
S
PRIORITY: HIGH
I�ACrWAY
WEFT GtEFk TsI`fA
21.0
WEST CREEK TAIYA
UNDEVELOPED ! FEES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
P'ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*SSG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 749
FLO14 AV ANNUAL (CFcj) 4OO
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENERGY PRODUC T I ON�—ANN� CAI-. (MWH) 105000
POWEP ETC}R.'AV FLOW -RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.57
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UN I TS
I DIV ES TMENT . STRUC:TURE&GEN ($1 D�, 0 )
TNVESTMENT, `TRANSMISSION (21000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($iMWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /IOW )
Ate COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: USGS
:** E;NVIRONMENTAL/4OCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES.
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFEC7ED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
PUTS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES. INCLUDED IN APA 252 UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(67)
:** E;NVIRONMENTAL/4OCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES.
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFEC7ED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
PUTS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES. INCLUDED IN APA 252 UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(67)
Page 1-186 Missing
Page 1-187 Missing
Page 1-188 Missing
AK 1 189
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALA SKA COUNTY: LIEPER YLIKON PR I OR I TY i MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM DAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
J PRO PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
J PRO DFP/INDEP E: DEPENDENT
NHS IV # A#s 7NPA036 a
AFTERT$AY
�.lENETI �'
�� ��4. / 1 10.0
E F CHANDALAk RIVER
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVER SION(MODIFTED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
* �: *ENG I NEER I FAG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
�S
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 9R
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 2070
C'A.PAC� I TY . INSTAL —LED (IOW) 25000
ENERGY PRODU+'T I ON—AIINLIAL (MWI-0 122000
POWER STOR/Z FLOW „ RA-r io 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION I_INITS
INVFSTMENT.STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT . TRANSM I SS I LIN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPI.JT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW)
AV CAST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI iS
#�***FNV I RONMENTAL / SOC: I F L. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CUI-T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATEP QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFEC`fED
POLITICAL- FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON!W NV IR GRP ATT Pao/GOLF
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
LAND USE CONFLICT I ND I AN RESERVATION
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (351
AFTERT$AY
�.lENETI �'
�� ��4. / 1 10.0
E F CHANDALAk RIVER
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVER SION(MODIFTED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
* �: *ENG I NEER I FAG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
�S
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 9R
FLOW AV ANNUAL (C:FS) 2070
C'A.PAC� I TY . INSTAL —LED (IOW) 25000
ENERGY PRODU+'T I ON—AIINLIAL (MWI-0 122000
POWER STOR/Z FLOW „ RA-r io 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION I_INITS
INVFSTMENT.STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT . TRANSM I SS I LIN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPI.JT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW)
AV CAST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI iS
#�***FNV I RONMENTAL / SOC: I F L. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CUI-T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATEP QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFEC`fED
POLITICAL- FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON!W NV IR GRP ATT Pao/GOLF
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
LAND USE CONFLICT I ND I AN RESERVATION
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (351
#�***FNV I RONMENTAL / SOC: I F L. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CUI-T RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATEP QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFEC`fED
POLITICAL- FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON!W NV IR GRP ATT Pao/GOLF
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
LAND USE CONFLICT I ND I AN RESERVATION
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (351
U-S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
Pi4W SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE. ALASKA COUNTY: UPPER YUKON PRIORITY° MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME EAST FORD: CHANDALAR
LAT/LONG 68 1.9 /145 52„9
STREAM NAME E F CHANDALAR RIVER
MUNICIPALITY ARCTIC VILLAGE
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH V I VERS I ON ( MOD T F I Eli )
HYDROELECTRIC
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PF(C.� PURPOSE
PRO. I1FP l I NDiF f" D; DEPENDENT
NHS I D #i AK7NPAOS�a7
PRO�1 STATICS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*ENCq I NEED I NO ! ECCiNOM I C
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
162
FLOW AV ANNUAL
CPS)
�+35
CAPACITY, INSTAL LED
(KW)
19000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
90000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
��.q
EQUIPMENT SELEC:TIO
UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTUF E +GEN
( 1 OOO )
I NvE:STMENT .-rRANSM I SS I E:{N
(f C?i p)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT( /MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT'/CAPACITY
(/M,W )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(K 1 D Ci
COMMENTS;
RESERVOIR SYSTEM AhlRT. 78 USC�S
#ENVIRdONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
IRS
HAB
ESTi IARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVO
CULT RESOURCE SITE
S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
F.NVIR CRP ATT PRO/CCtFI
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO / CONUTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTSi
) A10. 190
LAND USE CONFLICT INDIAN RESERVfi�TION
NHS USsSr"APA MAPS
NOTE A(26)
ti Air 1 1571
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY W REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: : UPPER YIIKON PR I OR I TY s MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LITTLE ROCK
LAT/LONG
STREAM NNAMEMUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY`
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/ INDEP
D: DEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK6NPA 628
,7 1S.S /14 S.9
E F CHANDALAR RIVER
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR ( MODIFIED )
PRO, STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
131
FLO14 AV ANNUAL,
(CF S)
3700
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(IOW)
25000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
119000
000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUC URE&GEN
($1DOC�)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1OC�G)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT (fin/MWHiYR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
FOUR RESERVOIR
SYSTEM AHRI 78 USGS
�**#*ENV I RONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD /SCENIC':
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
S/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER' QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERALISTATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CONENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PROii CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
LAND USE CONFLICT — VE.NETIE INDIAN RESERVATION
SOURCES
COMMENTS;-
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A( 9)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF' ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04 /26/81
STATE: AL.ASKA COUNTY: VALDEZ•—CHIT—WHIT PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYKE
OWNER
ELFC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRO, DEP/INDEP It INDEPENDENT
NNHSI D # AK7NPA0041
ALL
.I�"tl`d CREEKS
�i �.1 /14la 10.2
ALL I SsCl*+ CREEK
VALDEZ
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENT?FIED SITE
*4' ** :ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 116E
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 49
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 4000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 18000
POWER STAR/AV FLOW i RA'i"IO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURF&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMCNT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O }TPUT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY - ($ /k'W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: FROM STAGE 2 REPORT, UPDATE ALT. PLAN 2
"* OAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRTTICAL WILDLIFE HAFT NNOFISHERIES HABITAT ANADROMOUS FISH
ENDANGERED SPECIES NO
WATER QUALITY
LATHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRIP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO)/CON
UTILITY INTEREST YES. CINDER STUDY
SOURCES NIAS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (54 )
r.'
ALL
.I�"tl`d CREEKS
�i �.1 /14la 10.2
ALL I SsCl*+ CREEK
VALDEZ
UNDEVELOPED / RE S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENT?FIED SITE
*4' ** :ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 116E
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 49
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 4000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 18000
POWER STAR/AV FLOW i RA'i"IO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURF&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMCNT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY O }TPUT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY - ($ /k'W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: FROM STAGE 2 REPORT, UPDATE ALT. PLAN 2
"* OAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRTTICAL WILDLIFE HAFT NNOFISHERIES HABITAT ANADROMOUS FISH
ENDANGERED SPECIES NO
WATER QUALITY
LATHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRIP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO)/CON
UTILITY INTEREST YES. CINDER STUDY
SOURCES NIAS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (54 )
r.'
"* OAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS NO
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRTTICAL WILDLIFE HAFT NNOFISHERIES HABITAT ANADROMOUS FISH
ENDANGERED SPECIES NO
WATER QUALITY
LATHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRIP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO)/CON
UTILITY INTEREST YES. CINDER STUDY
SOURCES NIAS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (54 )
r.'
SOURCES NIAS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (54 )
r.'
AK I 193
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — RUO ION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
0 126/S1
STATE: ALA SKA COUNTY: VALDE i —CHIT—WH I T PRIORITY: MZD I UM
PROJECT NAME
SILVER LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
DUCK RIVER
MUNICIPALITY
ER_LAMAR
19.9
1.#IVDE aELC►FEI"1 / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO-J STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 34.E
FLOW AV ANNUAL (OFS) 248
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 10000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 48000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW i RAT T O p
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($ 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY , ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1OCR)
C:OMMF_NTS R AHR I 78
A*001*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS Wo
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T T Cry!_ FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR OOP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USCS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(3S)
A*001*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS Wo
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITE'S
CRITICAL WILDLIFE' HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL I T T Cry!_ FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR OOP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USCS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(3S)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: VALDEZ- CHIT --WHIT PRIORITY: MEDIUM i
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DFP/INDEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0384
MCCLURE SAY
HANLEY :REEK
i�(i 3S. /14S 10.3
PORT HELL I E �IUAN
UNDEVELOPED ! RE'S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 296
FLOW Aid ANNUAL (CF S) 184
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 8000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 36300
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO D
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT ,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 O0 )
COMMENTS: A;HR I 78. EXISTING LOAM AND P014ERHOUSE
*v-*vEI'VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NIAS USOS/APA MAPS �
COMMENTS: NOTE A(50)
ffI
.I
MCCLURE SAY
HANLEY :REEK
i�(i 3S. /14S 10.3
PORT HELL I E �IUAN
UNDEVELOPED ! RE'S WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 296
FLOW Aid ANNUAL (CF S) 184
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 8000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 36300
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO D
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT ,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 O0 )
COMMENTS: A;HR I 78. EXISTING LOAM AND P014ERHOUSE
*v-*vEI'VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NIAS USOS/APA MAPS �
COMMENTS: NOTE A(50)
ffI
.I
*v-*vEI'VIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NIAS USOS/APA MAPS �
COMMENTS: NOTE A(50)
ffI
.I
, . A s1 19
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: VAL.DE Z--CHIT-wWH I T PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
KOTS I
VA RIVER
4
ATSINA RIVER
STRELNAE
11.0
�
RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
PRO J STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
** * NGIVEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 523
FLOW AV A14NUAL (r_.FS) 607
CAPACITY, I NSTAL LED ( Id: W) 28000�
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 13300
POKIER STOR.= AV FLOW : RA�f I O 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVF_STMENT , STR4JCTURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVESTM NT ,TRANSMISSION ($1440)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS; AHRI 78
0"***ENVIRONMENTALISOC;IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS WRANOEL—ST. ELIAS NATL PRESERVE:
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARTE: /WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE. SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENnANGERE'D SPECIES
DATER QUALITY
OTHER NArT REw AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NHS USGS /A,PAt MAPS PL 96--4-57
COMMENTS; NOTE A(R)
0"***ENVIRONMENTALISOC;IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS WRANOEL—ST. ELIAS NATL PRESERVE:
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARTE: /WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE. SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENnANGERE'D SPECIES
DATER QUALITY
OTHER NArT REw AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NHS USGS /A,PAt MAPS PL 96--4-57
COMMENTS; NOTE A(R)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- RED 10N X
PNW SMALL SCALE: HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTYA VALDEZ--CHIT--WHIT
PROJECT NAME
SOLOMON GULCH
TONSINA
!
15.
PRIORITY: HIGH
RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROJ STATUS, IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 607
FLOW AV ANNUAL C:FS) i SS
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 12040
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 65000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR fir, G1
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT:TRANSMISSIOra ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY" 0I,_ITPI_IT(!3/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT!_ CAPACTTN Nl$/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BRNEF I T / COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: DATA FROM FERC AHEM 73
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
*�*"ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS No
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAK S/RESERVOTRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS NO
FISHERIES HABITAT NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
PEAL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC:IES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST YES
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (90 )
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
*�*"ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS No
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAK S/RESERVOTRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES NO
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS NO
FISHERIES HABITAT NO
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
PEAL I T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC:IES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST YES
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (90 )
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (90 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REOTON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY s VALDE Z -CH I T-WHIT PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
1'OLSCtNA CREEK
LA,T/LONG
STREAM NAME
TraL SO
NA CREEK
LEN
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH D I VERi S I ON ( MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
-�: ****ENO I NEE'R I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 459
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 276
CAPACITY, I N`�TALL_ED (#e'W) 11000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL. (MWH) '53000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ;RATIO 0
ANNUAL.. PLANT FACTOR o. n'
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT.STRUCTURE&OEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT -TRANSMISSION ($ I000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY r.�I.JTPIJT ($/MWH/'YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /I<W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MUH)
SENEFIT/COST RATIO (n 100)
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
*"NOENV T RON]YIENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED 'SPECIES
WATER 01JAL I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/r~ON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT FFRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
MAJOR ANADROMOUS FISHERY
NHS l_1SGS /APA MAPS
NOTE A(9)
*"NOENV T RON]YIENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED 'SPECIES
WATER 01JAL I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUB ATT PRO/r~ON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT FFRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
MAJOR ANADROMOUS FISHERY
NHS l_1SGS /APA MAPS
NOTE A(9)
PAK 1 198
U . S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81.
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WADE HAMPTON PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM TAME
MUNICIPALITY
ANV I I<.
CHU I LNA{;
UPPER
26.9
ATCHI.I I LNK RIVER
LaIVDEVELO PETS / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
FROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
-***We / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 102
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 193
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 2000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 11000
POWER S`I`OR/AV FLOW :RATIO 4
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.62
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRI.��:TURE&GEN ($1000)
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I SS I ON ($1 GOO )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COT RATIO EX 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
Om**OENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
POSSIBLE. IN YUKON DELTA NAT . WILDLIFE REFUGE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS FL 96-487
NOTE A (5 )
Om**OENVIRONMENTAL/SOC:IAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC:
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE S I TE$
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
POSSIBLE. IN YUKON DELTA NAT . WILDLIFE REFUGE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS FL 96-487
NOTE A (5 )
Page 1-199 Missing
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE s ALA SKA COlJNTY: WRANGELL—PETER SB PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
AAR
ON
WRANGELL
55.0
UNDE VE1 OF'ED ! RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PRO•JI STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
* ***ENO I VEER Y NG / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 117
FLOW AV A14NUAL (CFS) 1100
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) 12000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 58000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW 2 RATIO q
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
114VESTMENT . STRUCTURE&OEN ($1 OCO )
INVESTMENT, TRANSMI SSIO 4 ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($YMWHiYR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY APAC:I TY ($ /IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS. ADD. SOFT DAM REQ WEST -OF MAIN DAM.
�*****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS 140
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB AZT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
POSSIBLE
NHS USGS / APA MAPS
MOTE A(66)
AHRI 78
ram>AKI
;
200 01:
�*****ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL. ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS 140
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB AZT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS
POSSIBLE
NHS USGS / APA MAPS
MOTE A(66)
AHRI 78
ram>AKI
;
200 01:
AE;l 1 20 S.
U _ S . DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION )(
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSB PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROTECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM !NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
FROJ DCP/INDEP
NHS ID #
ANAN CREEK
56 10.0 / 131
ANAN CREED
YES BAY
UNDEVELOPED !
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK7iNPA041 S
52.1
RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
*****ENG I VEER I iNOs / ECONOMIC
{NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION --ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/Ak) FLOW ;RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUC':TURE&GEN ($1 U00 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSIGN (*1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 DLL )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
FACTORS
299
276
7000
33000
0
/y
0.53
*,�***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SC'ENIC NO
EST(.)AR I ES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR:
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/COIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS 1JSGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (27 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
O4/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME B
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PR�.�J PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I; INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # A�: 7NPA0416
rURNETT LADE
URNEi'T CREEK
WRANGELL
27.9
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 229
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) s0
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 3000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 12290
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.46
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTME14T a STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSICAN ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY Y t�IJTPIJT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWI-I )
SENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: HR I 78 US08
*i****.ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R ORP ATT PRO/CON
'SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION {
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(55)
r: p,', AK 1 102
rURNETT LADE
URNEi'T CREEK
WRANGELL
27.9
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 229
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) s0
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 3000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 12290
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.46
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTME14T a STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSICAN ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY Y t�IJTPIJT ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWI-I )
SENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: HR I 78 US08
*i****.ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R ORP ATT PRO/CON
'SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION {
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(55)
r: p,', AK 1 102
*i****.ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R ORP ATT PRO/CON
'SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION {
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(55)
r: p,', AK 1 102
AK 1 203
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND $ I TE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE; ALAS: A
COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERS B
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LC+NO
STREAM NAME:
MUNICIPALITY
WRANC�Et_L
CRITTENOEi CREEK
15.1
CR I TTEiTiEiV CREEK
UNDEVELOPED R IJN OF RIVER
PRO J STATiJ8 %
PRIORITY: LOW
IDENTIFIED SITE.
** *ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWEP' 14EAD (FT) 119
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 66
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 1850
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 8128
POWERSTOR/AV FLOW :RATIO .00
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR: 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1GG�i) 12761
I LAVES TMENT , TRANSM I SS I GN ($1 OOO) 5100
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR) 1631
rNVESTMEMT/CAPACITY ($/KW) 7167
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH) 118
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1()O) SS
COMMF_NT S i TERRAIN SUITABLE FOR CONST OF FOREBAY ONLY
*#***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKL ANnS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE' SITES
CRITICAL„ WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDA14GERED SPECIES
WATER QUAL. I TY
OTHER MAT RES, AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
I
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CO
ENVIR G�RP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
ANADROMOUS SALMON
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
ONLY SEASONABLE POWER OBTAINABLE, MOTE A (34 )
*#***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKL ANnS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE' SITES
CRITICAL„ WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDA14GERED SPECIES
WATER QUAL. I TY
OTHER MAT RES, AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
I
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CO
ENVIR G�RP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
ANADROMOUS SALMON
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
ONLY SEASONABLE POWER OBTAINABLE, MOTE A (34 )
r
U.S, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: a ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL.—PF_'CER SEA PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONi
STREAM NAME DELT CREEKMUNICIPALITY CAPE
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO�J PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROJ DEP/INDEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # 114K7NPA04OG
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSTON(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1447
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 81
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) 13000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON�-Ah'h� IUAL (MWH) 6300
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVE-30TMENT , STi=�UCTt RE'&GEN ($1000 )
iNVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($14�OG)
INVE:STMENTi`ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/k:W)
AV COST OF ENERGY (`$/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST IT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
04A*"ENV I RONMENTAL/ SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS 1g10
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE `ti.� I TES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COI
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
RUTH
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSTON(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 1447
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 81
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (IOW) 13000
ENERGY PRODUCT I ON�-Ah'h� IUAL (MWH) 6300
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO G
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.55
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
I NVE-30TMENT , STi=�UCTt RE'&GEN ($1000 )
iNVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($14�OG)
INVE:STMENTi`ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/k:W)
AV COST OF ENERGY (`$/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST IT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
04A*"ENV I RONMENTAL/ SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS 1g10
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE `ti.� I TES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COI
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
RUTH
04A*"ENV I RONMENTAL/ SOC: I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS 1g10
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES WETLANDS
RECR LAKE S/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE `ti.� I TES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/COI
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
RUTH
LAKE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A,(84)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY _ REC31 M X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/2 /S1
STATE: ALASk: A COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSB PR I OR I TY i MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
HARD
I NC; RIVER
HARDINCs RIVER
5 1 .1 /1 l 38.9
WRANGELL
UNDEVELOPED RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PRO�,i STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 259
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 725
C°APAC'TTY, INSTALLED (KW) 18000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) SSOOCS
POWER STOR/AEA FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
EQUIPMENT SELECTION (UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN (`� 1.00}O )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENE.R(+Y OLITPE_IT ($ !MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY (a/Ir=W)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMF_NTS: ALTERNATE TO TYEE
���r-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/ SC:ENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NArT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE A0ENCIE
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENV T R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
SOURCES NHS �.USQS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(64)
..I 1 ''C-5
F ,
���r-ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/ SC:ENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NArT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE A0ENCIE
LOCAL PULE ATT PRO/CON
ENV T R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
SOURCES NHS �.USQS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(64)
..I 1 ''C-5
F ,
U.B. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE; ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL-PETERSB PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG 56 32.9 /131
STREAM NAME KATETE RIVER
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED
OWNED
ELEC UTILJTY
OTHER DEVELOPER
R
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/INDEP I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK7NPA0421
E<:ATETE RIVER
WR'ANCELE..
45.9
� P#FB WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENO I NEE ER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET .POWER HEAD (1 r) 248
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 792
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENEROY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH ) 99000
900
POWER OTOR/AV FLOW -RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
E(DUIPMENT SELEr',TTON UNITS
I NVESTMC" NT - STRUCTURE &GE'N ($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPU'i ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTIMEE�NT/CAPACIT'r ( /1�4W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 OCR )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
**A**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
E STUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES!RESERVOIE='�:
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDAFFECTEDPOL I T T C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE DERAL/STATE. AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/Cr zN
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NHS U:C(aE;/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (7Ca )
E<:ATETE RIVER
WR'ANCELE..
45.9
� P#FB WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
SOURCES
PROD STATUS; IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENO I NEE ER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET .POWER HEAD (1 r) 248
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 792
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 21000
ENEROY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH ) 99000
900
POWER OTOR/AV FLOW -RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.53
E(DUIPMENT SELEr',TTON UNITS
I NVESTMC" NT - STRUCTURE &GE'N ($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRANSM I S I ON ($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPU'i ($/MWH/YR)
INVESTIMEE�NT/CAPACIT'r ( /1�4W )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 OCR )
COMMENTS: AHR I 78
**A**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
E STUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES!RESERVOIE='�:
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDAFFECTEDPOL I T T C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE DERAL/STATE. AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/Cr zN
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NHS U:C(aE;/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (7Ca )
**A**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC No
E STUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES!RESERVOIE='�:
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTEDAFFECTEDPOL I T T C:AL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE DERAL/STATE. AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/Cr zN
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NHS U:C(aE;/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (7Ca )
I.), S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/91
STATE: ALAr-N;A COUNTY: WRANOELL—PETERSB P'RIORITYi MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONE'+
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROD DEP/INDEP
NHS ID #
KUNK LADE / + +y )
56 17.1 1132 23.2
KUNK CREEK
WRANGELL
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
Ia INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA0070
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*"*EIVG I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
I4ET POWER HEAD
(FT)
304
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
74
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(Kw)
2.260
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
9900
POWER STOR/AV FLOW ;RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GE'N
($1000)
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENFRGY OUTPLJT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT /CAPACITY
($ IKW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
V I RG I N I A
LAKA PROJECT S /77 BECK
**NENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTOR'S
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT REG AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL!STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT FRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CCIN
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LITTLITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USf S/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(31
'�'*4 Alf i 2t.) J 7 ,,
AK 1 208
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REG I ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTYP WRArNGELL—PETERSD PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
MARTEN CREEK
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MARTEN CREEK
E'LL
!
ACCEPTABILITY
511. 0
RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUSa IDENTIFIED SITE
: 44-'--**ENG I NEED I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 934
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 32
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (FEW) 4000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWFA) 17000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL_ PLANT FACTOR .49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRIJC;TURE&GEN ($1000)
TNVESTMENT.,rRANSMISSION ($1400)
INVESTMFNT/ENERGY OUTF=UT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS. AHRI 78 USGS
**PAENV IRCJNMENTA,L/SOC:I AL
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENICNCB
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HATS
F I SHER I E:S HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA►T FEES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/ ',;TAy'rE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONLITILITY INTEREST
FACTORS
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (8) )
**PAENV IRCJNMENTA,L/SOC:I AL
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENICNCB
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HATS
F I SHER I E:S HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA►T FEES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/ ',;TAy'rE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONLITILITY INTEREST
FACTORS
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A (8) )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL—PETERSB PRIORITY. MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
MCHLNRY LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MCHENRY CREEK
WRANGE!_L
20.2
L NDE4 ELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION ( MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 299
FLOW AV ANNUAL. (CFS) 160
CAPACITY, Y, INSTALLED (KW) OO�jp
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 21790
POWER GTOR/AV FLOW :RATIO p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0. 4 a
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVE+TMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSTON ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTME"T/CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COOT OF FNERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPEC T ES
WATER QUALITY
.q OTHER NAT REAFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRE +/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS �_ SGS / APA Mt Pia
COMMENTS: NOTE A(70)
*�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAIL
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPEC T ES
WATER QUALITY
.q OTHER NAT REAFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP' ATT PRE +/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS �_ SGS / APA Mt Pia
COMMENTS: NOTE A(70)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY --
P'NW SMALL,.. SCALE HYiiROELECTR I C RESG€ ROOE AND
04/2 /S1
STATE: ALASKA
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
PROJ DEP / I NDEP
NHS ID i#
COUNTY: WRANGEL.L--PETERSB
REG I ON X
SITE RANKING INFORMATION
MENEFEE LAKE
56 3.9 /132 12.?
ME'NEFEE CASCADE
ETOLIN ISLAND
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
HYDROELECTRIC
I: INDEPENDENT
AK6NPA:0397
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
NET POWER HEAD (FT)
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS)
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW)
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH )
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
EQUIPMENT wELFCTION UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUC,TURF&GEN ($1000 )
ILAVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWI I/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTSe AHRI 78 USGS
PROD STATUS:
FACTORS
964
4_
6000
5000
0
0.47
PRIORITY: MEDIUM
IDENTIFIED SITE
�*K*NmENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENC I ES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCE'S
COMMENT S
NHS USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A (35 )
U.8. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/war/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANOELL—PETERSB PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME V I RCS I N I A LAKE
LA't /LONG 56 28.4 / 132 10.0
STREAM NAME MILL. CREEK EAST PASS
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MOU I F I ED )
OWNER
EI_EC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PRr_+J DEP / I NDEP I-. INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE;
NHS ID # AK7NP'A 0 4O9
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOM3C FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
1149
FLOW AV ANNUAL.
(CFS)
18
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
SCO
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
(MWH)
1338
POWER $TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT78TRUCTURE&GEN
($1000)
T NVEs*rMENT , TRAN =MISSION
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTPIJT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT /CAPAl : I TY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100)
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78
#mW�i*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/BTATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/COiq
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(2)
AK1 211
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY w REO ION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/S1
S TATEi ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGEL..L--PETERSD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
NAVY LAK
E
CREED
(a 4. / 1 25.3
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****#ENO I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC': FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 219
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 37
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (1:W) 1200
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 5400
POWER STC-Rr'AV FLOW -RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT F'A� ATOR 0.51
EQLl I PNENT SELECTION UNITS
TNVESTMENT, CTRlJCTl-,lRE'&OEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT ,TRANSMISSION ($ t 000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT /CAPACITY ($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
A* * ENV I RONMENTA►L / :HOC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
N0
POTENTIAL WILD/ ti CEN I C SIG
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
P OL I I' I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEPEST
SOURCES NHS USOS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(25)
A* * ENV I RONMENTA►L / :HOC I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
N0
POTENTIAL WILD/ ti CEN I C SIG
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
P OL I I' I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEPEST
SOURCES NHS USOS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(25)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REOI ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING I NFOPMAT I C)N
04f26f81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL—PETERSB PRICARITYi MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNIC:I PAL.I TY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNED
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROJ PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC':
PROJ DEFfINDEP
Ia INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AID. 6NPA0415
DRA iF I L'LD RIVER NORTH
G 1�f. /1S1 22.0
N URADFIELD RIVER
YES SAY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
tFT)
156
FLOW AV ANNUAL.
(CFS)
1659
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
27003
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL
04WH)
131000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW : RATIO
0.5
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UN I TS
INVESTMENT , STD" UCTURE&GEN
($ i oo � )
I N41F STMENT , TRANSM I SS I ON
(1000 )
IN"WESTME.NT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
DENEF IT/COST RATIO)
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
AHR I ?S
�mm* ENV I RONhiENTALf SC)C I AL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL. WILD/SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
REC'R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDA61GERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NA'T RE S AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
ANADROMOUS FISH AREA
YES. INCLUDED IN APA 252
NHS USGS/AP'A MAPS
NOTE A (59 )
.�K I. 213
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RF—SO IRCE AND SITE RATING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALAS KA COUNTY: WRANGELL-P'ET'ERS S PRIORITY; MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
OLIVE LAME
/ 1:2
18.9
/ REL WITH DIVERSION € i1OT i I FI ED )
P"ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
0*** *ENO I VEER I No / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 269
FLOW AV ANNUAL, (C:FS) 24
CAPACITY. INSTALLED (KW) 1000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 4421
POWER STOR/ A`J FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELEC:TTON UNITS
INVESTMENT . STRUCTURES&GEN ($1000 )
I NVE STMENT, TRANSM ISS I ON (IA10G0 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($IKW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COM�#ENTS: AHRI 78
*�K-�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILT! /SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WET!-ANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT R'E S AFFECTED
POL I T I CAL E= ACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
FOSSIBLE
NHS
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
USP•aS/AP'A MANS
NOTE A (29 )
*�K-�**ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILT! /SCENIC: NO
ESTUARIES/WET!-ANDS
REC:R LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT R'E S AFFECTED
POL I T I CAL E= ACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL. PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR ORP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
INTEREST
FOSSIBLE
NHS
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
USP•aS/AP'A MANS
NOTE A (29 )
t 1, S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REOI ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04,- 26 / 8 1
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETER Sly PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
SCENERY CREEKLAT
/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPO
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PRO J PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DE.P/INDEP
1: INDEPENDENT
NNHSI D #
AK7NFA0401
? 4R' /1` 41.
SCENERY CREEK
PETERSr�_�RG
UNI+EVE1.lPE�� ! RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED )
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
****E'NGI VEERY NBC / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
619
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
202
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
1 l-5000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(ilWH)
67000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0,5
EQUIPMENT ELECTTON
UNI'!�S
ILAVESTME'NT,STRUCTIJRE&GEN
($i000)
I NVESTMFNT , TRAM SM I SS I ON
(z% 1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/IIWH/YR )
I NVESTME'NT /C:APAC:I TY
($/ Kt4 )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 1�J0)
COMMENTS:
APS 76 DATA P'F>50 AHRI 6
*W.:�*ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
GRP ATT P'ROYCON
SUC:I A!_ GRP' ATT PRO/ CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(114)
U.S. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - RE 13I ON X
PNW SMALL. SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/Si.
STATE: ALASKA COUNTYy WRANGELL-PETERSR PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
THOMS LAKE
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RE83OURC`E TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROM PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PRO.J DEP / I NDEP
I; INDEPENDENT
NHS ID 4
AK7NP'AG4G5
5a 14.0 / 1:�2 15.0
THOMS CREED
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
P'ROJ STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC: ACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
229
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(C'FS)
93
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
". 000
ENERGY PPODUCT I ON --ANNUAL
(MWH)
14255
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
4).54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT - STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TR�ANSMISSION
($1004)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($!k'W)
AV COST OF ENERGY
$/MWH )
E;�ENEF I T /COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS;
AHEM 7S
0�**�ENVIRONME,4-r,'�L/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE RAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
$OCTAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
P'OSS I BLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A (4S )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY •— REG I; ON X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALAS; A COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSB PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT RAMC
TOM CREEK
/a 1.4 /1S1 40.3
YES SAY
UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
P'ROJ STATUS; IDENTIFIED S ITF
**ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAVE (FT) 379
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CPS) 148
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 8500
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 37467
POWER STGR/AV FLOW :RATIO O
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT. STRUCTURE&GF_N ($100 i )
INVFSTMF.NT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OIJTP'UT (�; /MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENTSi AHRI 78
���*iAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT ReES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT P'RO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(82)
AK1 217
���*iAENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES /WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAR
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT ReES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT P'RO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST'
SOURCES NHS USES/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: NOTE A(82)
AK1 217
,ji-
, AK 1 2 1 10
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RAND I NG INFORMATION
04/26/81
:STATE i ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
TOWERS CREEK
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
TOWERS CREEK
G
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIF7.ED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
***ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 255
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 41.4
CAPAC I ,F'/, INSTALLED (KW) 1'�000
ENERGY PRODUCTION —ANNUAL, (MWH) 64000
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.56
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVE STMENT- STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVE�STME34T/ENERGY OUTi=UT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
Ark COST OF ENERGY ($ /MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 75
*M-**0FNVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAP
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REw AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PESO/CON
E'NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTSe
NHS IJSO a/APA MAPS
NOTE A (4-9 )
*M-**0FNVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAP
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT REw AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PESO/CON
E'NVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSSIBLE
SOURCES
COMMENTSe
NHS IJSO a/APA MAPS
NOTE A (4-9 )
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REO ION X
PNk" SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/ 6/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSS PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME TYEE CREEK
LAT/LONG 56 12.0 /131 33.0
STREAM NAME TYEE CREEK
MUNICIPALITY YES SAY
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION(MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
P'RO,J PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DEP/TNDEP I: INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
NHS ID # AK7NPA0408
**-)-;*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
1356
FLOW AV ANNUAL.
(CFS)
163
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(F:W)
30000
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(MWH)
1 "33-2940
POWER STOR/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
INVESTMENT , STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENT,TRANSMISSION
($1000)
INVESTMENT /ENE'ROY OIJTPI JT ($} MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT.ICAPACITY
($/KW)
AV COST OF F_.NCROY
($/MWH )
SENFF 1 T /COST RATIO
(X 1 O0 )
COMMENTS: DEC 1979 RW RUTHERFORD STAGE II DEV.
->**ENV I RONMENTAL /SOCIAL ACCEPTA51 L I TY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC N4
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL.. FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT FRO/CON
FUTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES NHS USGS/APA MAPS
COMMENTS: PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. NOTE A (141 )
�, K1 21.9
Y 4
K
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTY: WRANGELL--PETERSF PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME SUNRISE LAKE
LAT /LONG 56 24.0 / 132 29.0
STREAM NAME UNNAMED
MUNICIPALTTY WRANGELL
RESOURCE TYPE UNDEVELOPED / RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
PROJ T'3EP / I NDEP Is INDEPENDENT PROD STATUS: S: IDENTIFIED S T TE
NHS 10 # AK7NPA0403
****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC
FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
1898
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
25
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
5000
ENERGY PRODUC:T I i�N--ANNUAL
(MWH)
25298
POWER STOR.'AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
0.57
EQUTP'MENT SELECTION
UNITS
TNVESTIIENT,STRIJC:TURE&GEN
($1000)
INVESTMENT, TRANSM I SS I CAN
(t 1 000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY Or_ITPI {T ( /MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 100 )
COMMENTS:
AHRI 78 BECK 77
SUBMARINE TRANSMISSION LINES ROD
*r-�***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLA14DS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL_ FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENV I R GRP ATT PRO / CON
SOCIAL CARP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
POSS T BLE
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHr" USES/APA MAPS
NOTE A(117)
U.S. DEPARTIsiENT OF ENERGY -- REGION X
P'NW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY i WRANGELL—PETERSB
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG 56
STREAM DAME
MUNIC TPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
F_L.EC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC:
PROD DEP / I NDEP It I I4DEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK6NPA0410
WHITE RIVER
WHITE RIVER
1C�.0 /1?1 30.0
YES RAY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS:
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (I✓ T) 329
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 5'30
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 26000
ENERGY PRODU CT I ON --ANNUAL (MWH) 116440
POWER STOP/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT=TRANSMI'SSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT (Z/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($1Kw )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 oo )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
#*k}�ENVIR0NMENTAL/ OCTAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
P'OTENTtAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUAL. I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STALE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP` ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTERES'r
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(332)
WHITE RIVER
WHITE RIVER
1C�.0 /1?1 30.0
YES RAY
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS:
*ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (I✓ T) 329
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 5'30
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 26000
ENERGY PRODU CT I ON --ANNUAL (MWH) 116440
POWER STOP/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.51
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT, STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
INVESTMENT=TRANSMI'SSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OUTPUT (Z/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($1Kw )
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 1 oo )
COMMENTS: AHRI 78 USGS
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
#*k}�ENVIR0NMENTAL/ OCTAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
P'OTENTtAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUAL. I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STALE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP` ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTERES'r
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(332)
PRIORITY. HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
#*k}�ENVIR0NMENTAL/ OCTAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
P'OTENTtAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUAL. I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STALE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP` ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTERES'r
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NHS USGS/APA MAPS
NOTE A(332)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA COUNTYn WRANGELL—PETERSD PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
F_LEC I JT I L I TY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE HYDROELECTRIC
P'ROJ VEP/ I NDE:P h INDEPENDENT
NHS ID # AK6NPA0414
ANITA
WRANr.�I� l.l�
y 15.5 l 13 26.5
Z I MO'J I A STRAIT
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
I PRO STATI S: IDENTIFIED SITE
-****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER 14EAD (FT' 1006
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 27
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (K.W) "��"_r:30
ENERGY' PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 14150
POWER ;TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
1 NVES'rMENT . TRANSM i S S I i �N ($1 G OO )
INVESTMENT/ENER13Y OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR 1
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY (4i/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: VIROINIA► LAKE PROJECT 8/77 BECK
*��**ENVIRO) !,t,IENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTIJARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUAI_ I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL_ PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LIT I L'I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS U SG S/APA MAPS
NOTE A(71)
�Srs 1 22 A.
ANITA
WRANr.�I� l.l�
y 15.5 l 13 26.5
Z I MO'J I A STRAIT
UNDEVELOPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
I PRO STATI S: IDENTIFIED SITE
-****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER 14EAD (FT' 1006
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 27
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (K.W) "��"_r:30
ENERGY' PRODUCTION —ANNUAL (MWH) 14150
POWER ;TOR/AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL. PLANT FACTOR 0.5
EQUIPMENT SELECTION UNITS
INVESTMENT,STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
1 NVES'rMENT . TRANSM i S S I i �N ($1 G OO )
INVESTMENT/ENER13Y OUTPUT ($/MWH/YR 1
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($ /IOW )
AV COST OF ENERGY (4i/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: VIROINIA► LAKE PROJECT 8/77 BECK
*��**ENVIRO) !,t,IENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTIJARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUAI_ I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL_ PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LIT I L'I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS U SG S/APA MAPS
NOTE A(71)
�Srs 1 22 A.
*��**ENVIRO) !,t,IENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTIJARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RE SERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUAI_ I TY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL_ PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR CARP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
LIT I L'I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS U SG S/APA MAPS
NOTE A(71)
�Srs 1 22 A.
U.S. DCPARTMENT OF ENERGY -- REG T.ON X
PNO SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/Si.
'-TATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: YUKON-KOYUKLIK
PROJECT NAME
JACK RIVER
LAT/LONG
STREAM NAME
JACK RIVER
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC: UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PROD DFP/INDEP
I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #�
AK7NPA2622
PRIORITY: HIGH
Ct�N'i'WELL
UNDEVELOPED ! RES WITH DIVERSION (MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS:
**ENOINEE:RING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
466
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
405
CAPACITY, INSTALLED
(KW)
28750
ENERGY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL
(IMWH)
125000
POWER STOP/AV FLOW :RATIO
0
ANNUAL PI..ANT FACTOR
0.49
EQUIPMENT SELECTION
UNITS
I NVESTMENT o STRUCTURE&GEN
($1000 )
INVESTMENTFTRANSMISSION
($i000)
INVESTMENT/EI�iI«RGY OIJTPUT ($/MWH/YR )
INVESTMENT/C:AOAC:I T Y
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($ MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
()' 100 )�
COMMENTS:
AHRI 7 USES
IDENTIFIED SITE
**MENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
El-'TUARIES/WETLANDS
REGR LADES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAB
FISHERIES HABITAT
E'NDANOERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SO�:IAL CARP ATT PRO/CONUTILITY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS;
II
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION 1
YES
NHS U aGS /APA MAPS
NOTE A(17)
AK I 22301.
''-A 'AK 1 224
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY — REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
SPATE: ALASKA COUNTY: YUKON—KOYl.iKUK PRIORITY: MEDIUM
PROJECT NAME
JIM RIVER
LAT/LONG:
STREAM NAME
�� I I�i RIVER
G� 46.8 F L 11.2
UNDEVFI�OPED / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS: IDENTIFIED SITE
*****ENGINEERING / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 161
FLOW AV ANNUAL (OF$) 442
CAPACITY, INSTALLED (KW) 9000
ENERGY PRL DIX-7 I ON�-ANNUAI_ (MWH) 43000
POWER STOR!AV FLOW vRATTO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 0.54
EQU I Pi 1ENT SELE1 :T I ON UNIT'
INVESTMENT . STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000 )
IN4ESTMENT,TRAMSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENEROY OIJTI-`UT($/MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/14=W)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($ / M�lH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100 )
COMMENT S i AHR I 78
*���ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/PESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
LOCATED IN KANUT I NATL WILDLIFE REFU0E
SOORCES
COMMENTS.-
NHS
NOTE A (44)
*���ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/PESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HALE
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL./STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREST
NO
LOCATED IN KANUT I NATL WILDLIFE REFU0E
SOORCES
COMMENTS.-
NHS
NOTE A (44)
AK 1 2251
r".
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - REGION X
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRTC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26!81
STATE: ALASKA
COUNTY: YUKON-KOYUKUK
PROJECT NAME
MELOZITNA
RIVER
ER
45.0
ER
RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PRIORITY: HIGH
PROD STATUS IDENTIFIED SITE
*****El4GINEERIN0 / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD (FT) 128
FLOW AV ANNUAL (CFS) 151-A
Ci?-LjPACITY, ims,rALLED (KW) 13000
ENFROY PRODUCTION -ANNUAL (MWH) 117OOO
POWER STOR!AV FLOW :RATIO 0
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR 1.02
EQUIPMENT SELECT ior.i UNITS
rNVESTMENT-STRUCTURE&GEN ($1000)
INVESTMENT :TRANSMISSION ($1000)
INVESTMENT/ENEROY OUTPUT ($..,!MWH/YR)
INVESTMENT/CAPACITY ($/KW)
AV COST OF ENERGY ($/MWH)
BENEFIT/COST RATIO (X 100)
COMMENTS: AHRI 78
*,,,,***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HADITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREs"r
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NH-0 USGS/APA MAP
NOTE A(SO','
*,,,,***ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIRS
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAD
FISHERIES HADITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER QUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POLITICAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES
LOCAL PUS ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL ORP ATT PRO/CON
UTILITY INTEREs"r
POSSIBLE
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
YES
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
NH-0 USGS/APA MAP
NOTE A(SO','
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGION x
PNW SMALL SCALE HYDROELECTRIC RESOURCE AND SITE RANKING INFORMATION
04/26/81
STATE: ALASKA
C COUNTY : YUKON- KOYUKUK
PROJECT NAME
LA'T/'LGNG
STREAM NAME
MUNICIPALITY
RESOURCE TYPE
OWNER
ELEC UTILITY
OTHER DEVELOPER
PROD PURPOSE
HYDROELECTRIC
PRO•. DEP/TNUEP
I: INDEPENDENT
NHS ID #
AK6NPAO432
TGTATLAIrIII{°A R I VER
c4 13. " / 1£ 44.3
TOTATI �AN I I aA F� I VER
AN£FE:R aO�l
tIIVDEVEI_OPEI� / RESERVOIR(MODIFIED)
PROD STATUS:
,� ****ENO I VEER I NG / ECONOMIC FACTORS
NET POWER HEAD
(FT)
419
FLOW AV ANNUAL
(CFS)
44O
CAPACITY:. INSTALLED
(KW)
24000
ENERGY PRODtUyw T I ON�-ANNUAL
(MWH)
114 000
POWER STOIC/AV FLOW :RATIO
p
ANNUAL PLANT FACTOR
.54
EQUIPMENT SELECTION'
UNITSINVE
STMENT, STRUC:TURE&GEN
($1000 )
I NVESTMENT, TRAN:SH I SS I ON
($1000 )
INVESTMENT/ENERGY OI ITPIJT ($.'MWH/YR )
INVESTMI^_NT/CAPAC:I"f y
($/KW )
AV COST OF ENERGY
($/MWH )
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
(X 1 CEO )
COMMENTS:
AHR I %S USGS
PRIORITY: HIGH
IDENTIFIED SITE
�K--*�ENVIRONiviENTAL/SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY FACTORS
PARKLANDS NO
POTENTIAL WILD/SCENIC NO
ESTUARIES/WETLANDS
RECR LAKES/RESERVOIR'S
CULT RESOURCE SITES
CRITICAL WILDLIFE HAS
FISHERIES HABITAT
ENDANGERED SPECIES
WATER DUALITY
OTHER NAT RES AFFECTED
POL T T I CAL FACTORS
FEDERAL/STATE AOENCIES
LOCAL PUB ATT PRO/CON
ENVIR GRP ATT PRO/CON
SOCIAL GRP ATT PRO/CONLIT I L I TY INTEREST
SOURCES
COMMENTS:
AK 1 *26
NO APPARENT OPPOSITION
NHS USOS/APA MAP
INCLUDED IN APA 252. MOTE A (31 )
r r"tr x