Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSand Point Waste Heat Correspondence 1990FPE consuttincet’ FERS 560 E. 34th Avenue, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph. (907) 561-1666 FAX (907) 561-7028 TO FEB 8 IG" 2/p/eo Llcke Energy Uthouls, WE ARE SENDING YOU [ Attached C Under separate cover via LETTE OF TRANSMITTAL RECEIVED “AEA FYOSO ATTENTION ALASKA ENERGY AlKaR ERY John Bethke the following items: O Shop drawings O Prints O Plans O Samples OO Specifications O Copy of letter OO Change order Oo COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / a at Kipbacemint a Ast AE AD B/ +33 oie (auncheal) A | Beterence Keport THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: O For approval For your use O As requested O Approved as noted O For review and comment Oo O Approved as submitted O Returned for corrections OO Resubmit. copies for approval O Submit copies for distribution O Return corrected prints O FOR BIDS DUE 29 O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS yy> oO © Pe oo Vl COPY TO. PRODUCT 240-3 (WEBS) Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471. SIGNED: Zi. Matinee If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. State of Alaska “ sieve Soren SoSerno: Alaska Energy Authority A Public Corporation TEL BcCOe Y (ANCHORAGE Telecopy Phone No. (907) 561-8584) (JUNEAU Telecopy Phone No. (907) 465-3767) TELECOPY SENT TO: NAME OF COMPANY: Ere COMPANY ADDRESS: Aricone faa ee TELECOPY PHONE NUMBER: t-~ zo SENDER: seat Er et ent TELEPHONE NUMBER: Zoi—- Fez CHARGE CODE: Sigs ze sor NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: Za INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE DATE SENT: jj) Fee AO IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THIS TELECOPY PLEASE CALL: (907) 261-7240-Anchorage (907) 465-3575-Juneau SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: cl RO. BOK AM Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 466-3575 = PO. Box 190869 701 East Tudor Roac = Anchorage Alaska 99519-0869 (907) 561-7877 TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT **k COUNT *%& # 2 eK SEND 2x NO REMOTE STATION I. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 001 907 5617028 2- 1-90 8:49 1°25" 2 TOTAL 0:01'°25" 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 State of Alaska N Steve Cowper, Governor Alaska Energy Authority A Public Corporation TEE eC ONP y (ANCHORAGE Telecopy Phone No. (907) 561-8584) (JUNEAU Telecopy Phone No. (907) 465-3767) TELECOPY SENT TO: T EC NAME OF COMPANY: ErPE COMPANY ADDRESS: ANCHOZAGE TELECOPY PHONE NUMBER: S6!l~70z28& SENDER: Jonn Burrow a TELEPHONE NUMBER: 261-7221 CHARGE CODE: S818 76302 NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: 2 INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE DATE SENT: | FEB FTO IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THIS TELECOPY PLEASE CALL: (907) 261-7240-Anchorage (907) 465-3575-Juneau SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: PO. Box AM Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 465-3575 PO. Box 190869 704 EastTudorRoad Anchorage, Alaska 99519-0869 (907) 561-7877 to: Tim Janneck, FPE from: John Bulkow, AEA date: 31 Jan 90 re: Waste Heat - Sand Point 1. Correct the concept numbers on page 28. 2. As mentioned in comments # 3 & 4 of the draft review, show where the waste heat piping enters the buildings and the proposed routing within the buildings on pages 29, 31, & 33. 3. As also mentioned in the draft review the material costs for the arctic piping seems higher than past experience indicates it should be. The costs being used by HMS are even higher than the ones being used by Clark-Graves. Please have both estimators double check these numbers before using them again. Perhaps they are holding too strictly to the 2" minimum polyurethane insulation thickness mentioned in the concept specifications and getting quotes on non-standard piping. FPE consuttinGel__IEERS 560 E. 34th Avenue, Suite »vJ Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph. oie 561-1666 FAX (907) 561-7028 Alaska Lnetou Aisthonlyy TO WE ARE SENDING YOU > attached OO Under separate cover via LETTE OF TRANSMITTAL DATE ™ U2 4/90 [" “AEA FIOSO Zohn Bulkowd) mn tape ee aN 2+ 1990 |__atasi ENERGY AUTHORIEY--——— the following items: 0 Shop drawings O Prints O Plans O Samples O Specifications O Copy of letter OO Change order ig COPIES DATE No. DESCRIPTION a | Flop Py Disks 7," THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: O For approval O Approved as submitted O Resubmit. copies for approval (efor your use OO Approved as noted O Submit copies for distribution O As requested O Returned for corrections O Return corrected prints O For review and comment Lt O FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS 19 O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO. PRODUCT 240-3 (WEBS) Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471 SIGNED: chs yl lbin by her Jam If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. FPE CONSULTING EN: ‘ERS 560 E. 34th Avenue, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph. (907) 561-1666 FAX (907) 561-7028 AEA LETTE OF TRANSMITTAL iI2clq0 [REAb 96D John Bulkow, PE. Zand tint DATE ATTENTION RE gt Soe. 13:0 eee oe a ee WE ARE SENDING YOU ([) Attached (1 Under separate cover via vay 2 6 1990 |____ peta een AuTHORFRY} the following items: 0 Shop drawings O Prints O Plans O Samples O Specifications O Copy of letter O Change order oO COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / Unlound Original G CoFlED | THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: OO For approval OO Approved as submitted O Resubmit. copies for approval O For your use O Approved as noted O Submit copies for distribution O As requested O For review and comment O Returned for corrections Oo O Return corrected prints O FOR BIDS DUE 19____~—S« PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS apne £E eit Gt COPY TO. PRODUCT 240-3 (WEBS) lnc, Groton, Mass. 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ~ Stote of Alcske shes Sena rere Alaska Energy Authority A Public Corperation TELECOPY (ANCHORAGE Telecopy Phone No. (JUNEAU Telecopy Phone No. (907) 465-3767) (907) 561-8584) t TELECOPY SENT TO: NAME OF COMPANY: ere COMPANY ADDRESS: a aa ec ct i ee TELECOPY PHONE NUMBER: __ S&)— Fos = SENDER: ado yins Burvoyws TELEPHONE NUMBER: 2et-7zz1 CHARGE CODE: 2iezesc2 NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: ea INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE DATE SENT: zz ab Aad os IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THIS TELECOPY PLEASE CALL: (907) 261-7240-Anchorasge (907) 465-3575-Juneau SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: (907) 468-3575 (907) 561-7877 Junecy,. Alaska 99811 ANGROreee® Alaska 99519-0869 PO. 30% AM 704 Eost Tuder Roa PO. Box 190869 TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT **k COUNT **& # 2 EK SEND aK NO REMOTE STATION I. D. START TIME | DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 001 907 5617028 1-22-90 13:04 | 1°19" 2 TOTAL 0:01'19" 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 State of Alaska N Steve Cowper. Governor Alaska Energy Authority A Public Corporation Ty ey GO) PY. (ANCHORAGE Telecopy Phone No. (907) 561-8584) (JUNEAU Telecopy Phone No. (907) 465-3767) TELECOPY SENT TO: Tm VANNECK NAME OF COMPANY: Fre COMPANY ADDRESS: Aniciio PAGE TELECOPY PHONE NUMBER: S6\i-7°z28 SENDER: JouH Burov TELEPHONE NUMBER: ZGI-72Zi CHARGE CODE: 8i8BZ26307 NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: Ze INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE DATE SENT: ZEA NAS IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THIS TELECOPY PLEASE CALL: (907) 261-7240-Anchorage (907) 465-3575-Juneau SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: PO. Box AM = Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 465-3575 PO. Box 190869 701 EastTudor Road Anchorage. Alaska 99519-0869 (907) 561-7877 to: Tim Janneck, FPE from: John Bulkow, AEA date: 22 Jan 90 re: Waste Heat - Sand Point 1. Correct the name of the utility on page 6. 2. Correct the photo labels on pages 13, 16, & 18. 3. On sheet 4 show where the waste heat piping enters the power plant and proposed routing within the plant. 4. On the user building floor plans (sheets 6, 8, 13, etc.) show where the waste heat piping enters the building and the proposed routing within the building. 5. In the calculations section correct whatever glitch is causing the heat demand to go to zero in the month of February. 6. Although SPE is planning to connect a waste heat system up to their administration building regardless of whether we build a system or not, go ahead and include the cost of connecting the SPE administration building in the cost of this project. The waste heat system shall likely belong to AEA for the life of the bond used to fund its construction and it may create maintenance problems to have part of the system owned by SPE. 7. In rechecking the Noorvik and Glennallen reports it was noticed that the material costs used for the arctic pipe seemed high. AEA purchased some arctic pipe in mid-1988 for just over a third of the cost per lineal foot used in these estimates. Although prices have likely gone up since then have Clark-Graves double check this cost before using it again in this and future reports. FPE consuttinGe EERS 560 E. 34th Avenue, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph. (907) 561-1666 FAX (907) 561-7028 ALA TO LETT. OF TRANSMITTAL ] ALD "FEAL USO “pe ToH#R BULKOW , 7.é. Sand faint Waste Heat Aleouery RECEIVED WE ARE SENDING YOU Kk atached © Under separate cover via the following items: ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY 0 Shop drawings O Prints O Plans O Samples O Specifications O Copy of letter OO Change order oO COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION | [DEAET REPOCT THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: O For approval OO For your use © Approved as noted OD As requested [Sal For review and comment © Le ae clk eR ae ae a © Approved as submitted © Returned for corrections O Resubmit copies for approval O Submit copies for distribution O Return corrected prints O FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ee v Le see es zg ne Ge COPY TO. PRODUCT 240-3 (WEBS) Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471 SIGNED: Mar tinn bs dL yn ) Pr If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. State of Alaska Steve Cowper, Governor Alaska Energy Authority A Public Corporation December 5, 1989 Mr. Steve Theno, P.E. Fryer/Pressley Engineering, Inc. 560 E. 34th Avenue, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Subject: Contract AEA 2800097, Work Order #8, Sand Point Dear Mr. Theno: You are hereby given notice to proceed on Work Order #8 to perform a concept level design of a waste heat system as presented in your proposal of December 1, 1989 (attached). Fee for this Work Order shall be a lump sum of $8,510.00 and expenses shall not exceed $2,127.00. As soon as possible, but no later than January 15, 1990, you will submit the final report to the Alaska Energy Authority. Please signify your agreement with the conditions of this Work Order by signing below and returning this document to the Energy Authority. Sincerely, But) MWetict— Robert E. LeResche Executive Director GS:REL:dm Attachment as stated cc: Brent N. Petrie, Alaska Energy Authority David Denig-Chakroff, Alaska Energy Authority Gary Smith, Alaska Energy Authority Arnold Reimer, Alaska Energy Authority Susan White, Alaska Energy Authority Concurrence with conditions of this Work Order: FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING, INC. Signature Title Date PO. Box AM Juneau, Alaska 99814 (907) 465-3575 ZY PO. Box 190869 704 East Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99519-0869 (907) 561-7877 7185/1021(2) ery P E RECEIVED @ December 1, 1989 : nre> 11969 Mr. David Denig-Chakroff, Director ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY, Rural Programs Alaska Energy Authority 701 East Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Reference: Revised Proposal to Render Professional Services, Generator Waste Heat Recovery Concept Design for the Communities of Glennallen, Kongiganak, Aniak, Sand Point, Gambell, Selawik and Fort Yukon Dear Mr. Denig-Chakroff: Please accept this letter, together with its attachments, as our statement of interest and our revised fee proposal to perform the referenced projects. We have reviewed documents provided by your office and base our proposal on our interpretation of the requirements suggested in those documents. Specifi- cally, we have based our fee proposal on the review of: 1. "Request for Proposals - Waste Heat Systems - Concept Level Designs," dated 20 November 1989. 2. One page Project Descriptions dated 20 and 21 November 1989. Se "Concept Level Documents," a paper describing the minimum technical con- tent of the final product of each project. 4. "Failure Analysis," a paper briefly describing the requirements of an analysis of system failures. Our interpretation of the projects requirements is restated in the attachments entitled, "TASK LIST FOR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS" and "FAILURE ANALYSIS FOR HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS". If awarded this project during the week of November 27, 1989, we anticipate adherence to the following schedule: Community Field Work Interim Final Week of Report Report Glennallen 12/04/89 12/29/89 1/15/90 Sand Point 12/18/89 12/29/89 1/15/90 Fort Yukon 1/01/90 1/12/90 1/26/90 Gambell 1/01/90 1/17/90 2/05/90 Kongiganak 1/15/90 1/29/90 2/12/90 Aniak 1/15/90 2/05/90 2/19/90 Selawik 1/29/90 2/08/90 2/22/90 FRYER/PRESSLEY ENGINEERING, INC. 560 E. 34th Ave., Suite 300 ¢ Anchorage, AK 99503 ¢ Ph: 907/561-1666 e FAX: 907/561-7028 Mr. David Denig-Chakroff December 1, 1989 Page 2 In summary, we propose to render the required services for lump sum fees as indicated in the following table: Community Professional Expense Totals Fees Budget Glennallen $ 8,834 SL, gle $10,546 Sand Point 8,510 2,127 10,637 Fort Yukon 7,344 1,904 9,248 Gambell 7,862 2,274 10,136 Kongiganak 7,344 1,979 9,323 Aniak 7,344 1,857 9,201 Selawik 7,344 2,104 9,448 Totals $54,582 $13,957 $68,539 Attached hereto are detailed cost estimates for each project. The costs of providing failure analysis, conducting meetings with the Alaska Village Electric Cooperative and coordinating the project with the Alaska Energy Authority has been allocated among all projects. The fees proposed, there- fore, are quoted based on the assumption that all seven projects will be un- dertaken; if one or more of the projects are canceled or delayed, compensation for the other projects should be reviewed. Should you have any questions regarding the content of this proposal, or its attachments, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, INC. e President, Mechunée ‘Engineering Attachments COMMUNITY GLENNALLEN —4 SAND POINT — ee oe An €, 6 E b+ - = - - +——* FORT YUKON — AB G D E GAMBELL — a a cee A B G D E KONGIGANAK — Ga Ds ra a lal aaa, A B Cc D E ANIAK I | —— —__—_—_—x = == = A BC. OD E SELAWIK raat H+} - = - 4+ LP Tt) ik CE Lt J 12/4 12/11 12/18 12/25 1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 22Z19 2/26 WEEK BEGINNING ANCHORAGE DATA COLLECTION AND MEETINGS FIELD DATA COLLECTION AND MEETINGS INTERIM REPORT PREPARATION AEA REVIEW FINAL REPORT PREPARATION REPORT SUBMISSION ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY WASTE HEAT SYSTEMS - CONCEPT LEVEL DESIGN PROJECT SCHEDULES lx moow>s TASK LIST FOR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY WASTE HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS Task 1. Data Collection (in Anchorage) Right-of-Way/Easement Map(s) This task is limited to coordinating the search of the Anchorage based sources of land status information with AEA. An exhaustive search among all possible sources of informa- tion is not intended. 1) Gather information available in Anchorage for the Glennallen site. Data for subsequent sites shall be furnished by AEA. Data to include: ° Aerial Photos ° U.S. Geological Survey information ° Plats . Alaska Dept. of Community and Regional Affairs data 2) Digitize a single base site map with general site fea- tures (roads, airports, etc.). Include platting in- formation only where it impacts pipeline routing. 3) Data collected on site will be added to the graphic presentation as appropriate. 4) Survey computations and verification of accuracy of material collected is not proposed to be a part of this task. Community Contact Contact community officials as suggested by the AEA, or as otherwise determined by FPE, to discuss the schedule and purpose of the site visit. The objective is to seek the community’s assistance and sup- port in the field work and the project, as well as to Provide the community with background information regarding the project. Electric Utility Interviews Conduct face-to-face interviews with Anchorage based repre- sentatives of electric generation utilities who provide service to the communities under study. Develop Criteria Listing Create a list of codes, standards and regulations to be adhered to during the design of the heat recovery systems. e. Interview with the Alaska Energy Authority Before leaving for the first site visit, discuss plans and schedules with representatives of the AEA. Meeting will cover plans, schedules and progress regarding all systems to be analyzed. FPE to create meeting agenda and take the initiative in scheduling this coordination meeting. Task 2. Data Collection (Field) a. Mobilize to the Field The people who will travel to the community must prepare to go to the field. They must buy supplies such as film, make transportation reservations, and coordinate the information requirements of the field work with the project manager and other disciplines. b. Field Work 1) Travel to the field. 2) Meet and visit with local officials of the community, the electric generation utility and managers of poten- tial heat-user facilities (e.g, school principals, hospital administrators, etc). 3) Walk and document potential waste heat pipeline rights-of-way (with community administrator if possible). 4) As-built electric power generation plant for purpose of waste heat recovery project. 5) Create preliminary waste heat recovery design. 6) As-built potential waste heat user facility mechanical Systems as required to create system concept design. 7) Acquire generation plant production profile informa- tion as may be available on-site. 8) Acquire potential heat-user energy demand profile in- formation as may be available on-site. TASK LIST FOR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY WASTE HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS Page 2 9) Take complete photographic coverage of the as-built condition, rights-of-way and other community features as may be required for the complete description of ex- isting conditions. 10) Participate in exit interview with community officials as is deemed appropriate. 11) Leave community and travel to next destination. Task 3. Project Products a. Prepare Field Report (FPE in-house product) 1) Prepare photo captions and mount photographs. 2) Prepare report of field activities (field diary). 3) Prepare report of community features. 4) Prepare notes of interviews with local officials. Ss) Prepare separate estimate of thermal production and use profiles based on field information. 6) File as-built information in project file or with graphics department supervisor (as appropriate). be Prepare Interim Report Assemble and submit field notes, draft project map and preliminary estimates of energy generation and consumption into an interim report. Include preliminary observations and narrative description concerning system configurations. c. Prepare Final Project Documentation 1) Prepare project summary statement. 2) Prepare narrative statement including discussion of heat source and sink(s). 3) Prepare graphic and tabulated estimates of potential thermal energy production and simultaneous demand. 4) Prepare schematic system graphic. 5) Describe piping and pumping system. This effort in- cludes right-of-way discussion and drawing. TASK LIST FOR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY WASTE HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS Page 3 6) Describe heat exchangers with location and layout sketch. 7) Describe any miscellaneous systems (e.g., associated building modifications or controls) required of the project. 8) Discuss user requirements, if any. d. Technical Analysis 1) Prepare month-by-month estimates of electric power production. 2) Prepare estimates of generation machine performance (KW per gallon) for various electric demand scenarios. 3) Prepare month-by-month estimates of thermal energy demand for the various potential thermal energy user facilities. 4) Prepare an integrated, month-by-month thermal energy use model and generate estimates of potential energy conserved through the use of waste heat recovery tech- niques. 5) Develop failure analysis. Create a brief description of the major modes of sys- tem failure. [See attached discussion of "Failure Analysis for Heat Recovery Systems" for a more detailed description of this task.] e. Construction Cost Estimates Based upon the compilation of the information discussed above, prepare an estimate of probable construction costs. f. Report Publication 1) 2) 3) 4) S) Select photos required for reproduction. Edit and compile materials. Produce final graphics. Review by Principal of final version of all materials. Reproduce, bind and transmit final report to AEA in 6 (six) copies. TASK LIST FOR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY WASTE HEAT RECOVERY PROJECTS Page 4 Task 1. Task 2. Task 3. Task 4. FAILURE ANALYSIS FOR HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS Identification of Failure Points Each major component in the heat recovery system will be iden- tified and described in brief, schematic form. Major components are envisioned to include: ° boost pump ° heat exchanger . radiator ° control valve . piping system ° user side heat recovery loop This effort will require 16 hours. Define Failure Mode and Impact Potential modes of failure for each major component shall be determined. The following shall be analyzed: . Effect on operation of heat recovery and generation system. ° Potential environmental impact. ° Required action of operators to mitigate short term and long term damage to the system. Each shall be addressed in brief narrative form. This effort will require 35 hours. Define Failure Frequency The frequency of failure of each major component shall be es- timated. Also, estimates of annual down time, effort to return to service, and effect of system life on frequency of occurrence shall be estimated. Results shall be presented in brief narrative form. It is assumed that there is no significant statistical data base existing from which to secure the above information. Detailed research is not proposed. Estimates shall be based upon brief conversations with major equipment suppliers, the utility companies and engineering judgment. Fault tree analysis of the problem is not proposed. This effort will require 35 hours. Failure Impact Study Input to Design Decisions The results of tasks 1, 2 and 3, described above shall be incor- porated in concept level design decisions. Estimate of Professional Fees and Expenses Waste Heat Systems - Concept Level Design SAND POINT Key personnel to be utilized: Principal-in-Charge - Steve Theno Project Manager = Tim Janneck Task 1 a: Compile Right-of-Way Information in Anchorage Title Effort Rate Project Manager 1 64.82 Senior Engineer (Civil) i 64.82 Staff Engineer 2 59.52 Senior Graphics Tech. 4 42.71 Clerical 2 41.28 Sub-task total 10 EXPENSES Misc. Expense (e.g., Air Photos & etc.) budget Expense Budget Task 1b, Other Pre-Field, Home Office Activities (Note 1) c, d& e: Title Effort Rate Principal-in-Charge 1 88.98 Project Manager 2 64.82 Senior Engineer 6 64.82 Clerical 1 41.28 Sub-task total 10 EXPENSES Misc. Expense budget Expense Budget (1) Task includes: a) Face-to-face interview with representative of electric generation utility (if available in Anchorage). b) Development of criteria listing. Estimate o Waste Heat SAND POINT Task 2: Task 3 a: f Professional Fees and Expenses Page 2 of 4 Systems - Concept Level Design Site Visit Title Effort Rate Fee Senior Engineer (Mech.) 24 64.82 $1,556 EXPENSES Air Travel Budget $600 Subsistence 3 85.00 255 Weather Day 8 64.82 519 Expense Budget $1,374 File Field Report Title Effort Rate Fee Principal-in-Charge 1 88.98 $89 Project Manager 1 64.82 $65 Senior Engineer (Mech.) 16 64.82 1,037 Senior Engineer (Elec.) 1 64.82 65 Senior Engineer (Civil) 1 64.82 65 Senior Graphics Tech. 4 42.71 a7 Clerical 2 41.28 83 Sub-task total 26 $1,574 EXPENSES Photo Processing budget $50 Expense Budget $50 Estimate of Professional Fees and Expenses Page 3 of 4 Waste Heat Systems - Concept Level Design SAND POINT Principal-in-Charge 1 Project Manager 2 Senior Engineer (Mech.) 8 Senior Engineer (Elec.) 4 ‘ Senior Engineer (Civil) 4 64.82 259 Staff Engineer 4 Senior Graphics Tech. 4 ZA Clerical 41.28 83 Sub-task total 29 $1,747 EXPENSES Blue Lines Budget $10 Computer Use 4 $10 40 Misc. Reproduction Budget 20 Expense Budget $70 Task 3 c, Prepare Final Report d, e & f: Title Effort Rate Fee Principal-in-Charge iL 88.98 $89 Project Manager ~ 64.82 $259 Senior Engineer (Mech.) 16 64.82 2,037 Senior Engineer (Elec.) a 64.82 65 . ERR a 64.82 65 Staff Engineer 4 59.52 238 Technical Editor 8 S9eon 476 Senior Graphics Tech. 4 a2 UL Lil Clerical 2 41.28 83 Sub-task total 41 $2,483 EXPENSES Blue Lines Budget $10 Special Reproduction Budget 150 Computer Use 4 $10.00 40 Construction Cost Consulting Budget 250 Expense Budget $450 Total Fees $8,510 Total Expenses S2 ype NO. OI nDU SWNe SUBJECT Page 4 of 4 LIST OF EXPECTED FIGURES EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING POWER PLANT PLAN POWER PLANT PIPING SCHEMATIC BUILDING 1 PLAN BUILDING 1 SCHEMATIC BUILDING 2 PLAN BUILDING 2 SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN/ROUTING GEN. ROOM PLANS GEN. ROOM SCHEMATICS BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING 1 PLAN 1 SCHEMATIC 2 PLAN 2 SCHEMATIC ARCTIC PIPE/UTILIDOR SECTION 20Nov89 gds REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS WASTE HEAT SYSTEMS CONCEPT LEVEL DESIGNS Contracting Point of Contact: Dominic Costanzo, Contracts Officer Technical Point of Contact: Gary Smith, Manager of Rural Projects Submission: Attention of David Denig-Chakroff, Director of Rural Programs Project Manager: John Bulkow, Rural Systems Engineer (after 4Dec89) Attached are individual RFP's for the performance of concept level design work at the listed sites. Each project will require a separately executed Work Order and cost. Each project description identifies completion dates as to when the Authonty requests that the work be accomplished. Each responding proposal must include a proposed completion date for each of the wo required submittals if quality products cannot be produced by the dates specified. It is requested that, if changes in the submission dates are proposed, work be accomplished as soon as possible with at least two projects being completed prior to mid-January. Project priority is to be maintained as listed. The final submittais must be of high presentation quality including color copies of photographs, color copies of CAD drawings, and laser printer produced text. CAD drawings will use color to distinguish among primary loop, secondary loops, existing and new construction, and other separation that enhances the ease of reviewing the design. Legends indicating the use of colors will be provided on the drawings. Covers for the final submittal will be provided by the Authority as will AutoCAD files of the title blocks for the required CAD drawings. If existing maps are marked-up for inclusion in the report, high quality results are required. If the 8.5" x 11" format of CAD drawings does not produce legible drawings, 11" x 17" fold-outs are required. The initial submittal is to be of draft presentation quality with black and white products only. Submitted products are subject to rejection for quality of presentation as well as technical content. The users of the final products will include Authority staff, State and local government personnel, personnel of affected utilities, using facilities’ staff, and bond market consultants. The concept level designs and costing may be reviewed by an independent firm. Depending on the availability of funds and the results of the initial work, it is anticipated that some of the projects will result in RFP's for work orders to complete final construction documents for summer 1990 construction. Each proposal will present the following items: 1. By major task and submittal, the discipline, manhours proposed, and previously negotiated rate. 2. By major task and submittal, the names of personne! assigned. 3. By major task and submittal, identify the hours and rate for CAD workstation charges. 4. By major task and submittal, estimated expenses (to include weather contingencies for field investigations). 5. By submission, an estimate of the number of CAD drawings to be produced (initial submittal is to be black and white, final submittal to be im color - additional charges for color plotting effort is to be identified). 6. Proposed cost estimating firm and fee (in-house costing is not acceptable). It is required that one single kick-off meeting with Authority personne! be held prior to field investigations for all sites listed. The proposed costs must be allocated among the projects. It is required that one meeting be heid with senior representatives of each utility. The proposed costs must be allocated among Projects at sites serviced by the same utility. Telephone contact in lieu of a meeting is not acceptable. . Right-of-way and easement assistance will be provided by the Authonty - the consultant is required to coilect platting information prior to a single meeting to be heid at the Authority's offices at which time a review of the anticipated potential requirements will be discussed and guidance issued. The proposed costs must be allocated among the projects. Field investigations should be of sufficient depth to negate the future requirements of further field investigations for completion of the construction documents. The consultant must submit a single, simple graphic presentation of the anticipated overall schedule indicating work on major tasks by project. Concept Level Documents Waste Heat Systems Concept level documentation shall include as a minimum the following: Right-of-way/Easement Map(s) A map showing property boundaries that would be crossed by the proposed system and existing right-of-ways / easements (markup of existing map(s) is allowed). Criteria Listing A list of all codes and regulations used in determining the system design. Distribution Piping and Pumping A brief description is required of the proposed distribution piping system (both primary and secondary loops) including material, insulation, pumping scheme, and connection procedures. Sketches are to be included as appropriate. Heat Exchangers A brief description is required of the proposed heat exchangers including potential configuration, locations and sizing. Sketches are to be included as appropriate. Miscellaneous Systems A brief description of all supporting systems including controls, engine modifications, powerhouse modifications, etc. is required including sketches as appropriate. User Requirements A brief description of modifications required to potential end user systems including sketches as appropriate. Technical Analysis A presentation of the assumptions made, data collected, and calculations performed is required to support the design approach taken. Cost Estimate Cost estimates are to be presented with unit costs by task, anticipated contract cost, project contingencies of 10%, SIOH as provided, and a total estimated project cost. Uniess otherwise directed, construction contract costs will be estimated assuming publicty advertised bidding, summer construction, and “mini-Davis-Bacon” wage rates. Major system components are to have separately identified life estimates and yearly maintenance cost estimates. Estimates of yearly fuel costs displaced by each user facility are to be identified. FAILURE ANALYSIS A brief description of the major modes of failure is to be presented. Each of which must include as a minimum concept ‘evel details of the following: 1. Description of failure 2. Effects on the continued operation of the power generation system. 3. Description of environmental impacts. 4. Required immediate actions of the power house or facility operators to minimize short-term and long-term damage to the system. 5. Estimate of frequency (occurances per year). 6. Estimate of down time (days/year). 7. Description and estimate of effort and material to return to full service (tasks/year). 8. Effects of system life on frequency of occurance. 9. Design decisions made to minimize failure rate and impacts. Assumptions to be made include: 1, On-site operators’ skills are that of a "care taker”. 2. Skilled PM is performed three times per year (Fall, Winter, Spring). 3. Weather delay in reaching site is one day (assuming winter failure). 4. Travel for emergency response or major repairs is via jet service to major community and charter from local carrier to site. 5. Skilled mechanics for emergency response or major repairs are mobilized from Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau as appropriate. 20Nov89 = Sand Point Waste Heat System Concept Level Design Problem ‘There is an identified opportunity for the installation of a waste heat recovery and distribution system in the community of Sand Point. The intent of this work order is to provide the Authority with sufficient detail to perform an economic analysis and to prepare for the later development of construction documents. Tasks 1. Data Collection (Anchorage) Existing drawings and site maps and/or aerial photos are to be collected and reviewed prior to field investigation. A discussion with the Authority's Rural Projects staff is required to be accomplished prior to field investigation. In addition, discussions with SAND POINT LIGHT & POWER CO. personne! is to be accomplished to collect construction and operating concerns of the Utility. 2. Data Collection (Field) A field trip is required with the consultant furnishing the services of a senior mechanical engineer. Field work is to include examination of the power house, potential distribution routes, and the HVAC equipment of the facilities determined by the consultant and the Authority to be potential candidates for use of the proposed waste heat system. Historical fuel consumption data are to be collected from facility owners or operators as weil as load data from the Utility. Corresponding heating fuel costs are to be collected as weil. Coordination with the Utility, the City government, and the owners and operators of the potentially served facilities is to be accomplished prior to the fieid work. 3. Products Two products are required. The initial submittal is to be a letter quality report including as a minimum: field trip notes, contacts made, list and description of potential served facilities, tabular and graphical presentations of the historical or estimated heating fuei consumption, tabular presentations of corresponding fuel costs of each potential facility by month, tabular and graphical estimates of availabie waste heat by month (identifying heat required at the power house), and a map showing locations of the power house and the potential facilities to be served. A narrative description of the proposed system is to be included. Three copies of the report are to be submitted. Work on the second submittal is to commence after receipt of the Authority's review comments. Review comments will be provided to the consultant within 10 working days after receipt of the report for incorporatioa into the final submittal. The second submittal is to be a letter quality report with an executive summary of the investigation. It is to include one copy in &5 x 11 format of all drawings produced as weil as color copies of appropriate photos. All drawings are to be provided in AutoCAD reil0 compatible drawing files (cither sketches or to scale as appropriate). The report should summarize the investigation and present a coacept level design of the recommended system including concept levei specifications and construction cost estimates based om publicly advertised, sealed bid procurement using “mini-Davis-Bacon" wage rates. Six copies of the report are required (including one unbound copy for use as a reproducable master). Proposed construction bidding is to be assumed as occuring in April of 1990. The basic intent of this product is to present the recommended solution and its construction sad operating cost estimates in suitable detail to allow for the follow-on development of an Authority produced ecomosnic analysis. Schedule It is required that the work be completed oa or prior to 19Jan90. The initial report is to be submitted on or prior to 15Dec89. SAND POINT WASTE HEAT RECOVERY REPORT AND CONCEPT DESIGN Contact Names The following people were contacted In the field: Donna Rogers, Office Manager - Sand Point Electric (383-4020) Dennis Whitney, Sand Point Fuel (383-4020) Dave Paulus, Operator - Sand Point Electric (383-4020) Chick Beckley, Principal at Sand Point School (383-2393) Don Eubank, Maintenance Man at Sand Point School (383-2393) Noel Hemenover, Postmaster - Sand Point Post Office Richard Cumberlidge, Caretaker for Gas station/Store (383-3291) JANUARY 26, 1990