Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S Intertie report 12-2000
—_________— Gage? 4s POWERING ALASKA’S FUTURE Dd ae 7 D Kae\ Shane December 28, 2000 7 fn \ D Fe GEIVE|y) | LNA gan os 2001 Mr. Robert Poe Alaska Industrial Development Executive Director and Export Authority Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority 480 West Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for December 2000 W.0.#E9590081 Dear Mr. Poe: Enclosed is 1 (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for December 2000. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. Sincerely, Eugene N. Bjornstad General Manager Enclosures: 1 (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report CH Lee Thibert Michael Massin 4, fs Dora Gore Jim Bétden Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.0.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF Chugach E lectric Association, Inc ° 7| 56 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Phase IC - EIS MONTHLY REPORT for December 2000 5601 Minnesota Drive / 99518 P.O. Box 196300 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 I. I. iil. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 1, Chugach Statement for November 2000 2. Activity Summary of November 2000 3. Transactions, Inception through November 30, 2000 4. Bank Account Activity Summary of November 2000 SCHEDULE 1. Project Schedule ITEMS FOR APPROVAL None. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION 1. POWER Engineer’s Monthly Report of December 15, 2000 2. Notice to Proceed to POWER Engineers of December 21, 2000 3. Agreement Settling the Anchorage-Kenai Intertie Phase I Funding Dispute L SUMMARY An agreement between the Settling Utilities and AIDEA has been executed. This document provides for funding participation by CEA, GVEA, AML&P, HEA and City of Seward in the work remaining under Phase | of the project. The agencies and consultants have been notified and will proceed with the preparation of the DEIS. This document should now be available in August 2001. Expenditures for Phase IC (EIS) of the project stand as follows: DESCRIPTION POWER COE/USFWS/RUS | CHUGACH | TOTAL ENGINEERS ORIG. BUDGET $389,547 $160,000} $100,000) $649,547 ALLOCATED $38,955 $0 $0} $38,955 CONTINGENCY TOTAL | $428,502 $160,000} $100,000) $688,502 AMENDMENTS $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COMMITMENT $428,502 $160,000} $100,000} $688,502 SPENT TO DATE $348,558 $151,289 $91,880) $591,727 % OF TOTAL 81% 95% 92% 86% Total Project expenditures as of 12/18/00 are $5,696,027. Il. FINANCIAL 1 Chugach Statement for November 2000 2. Activity Summary of November 2000 35 Transactions, Inception through November 30, 2000 4. Bank Account Activity Summary of November 2000 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska 12/14/00 TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Marina McCoy-Casey, Plant Accountant SUBJECT: E9590081 - Southern Intertie Route Selection Study You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Southern Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occurred during November 2000. Direct Labor 1,156.86 Indirect Labor 572.96 Heller Ehrman Inv. #32989 1,330.94 Era Aviation Inv. #2B2559 645.00 Sub-Total $3,705.76 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) $18.53 Total Charges $3,724.29 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As per your request, | will keep the original in the work order file. Concur: Oey; K Lp (2h 1S 2089 “Signat re Dat djw Attachments Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Southern Intertie Activity Summary November 2000 Beginning Grant Chugach Ending Bank Funds Interest Invoices Bank Year Balance Received Earned Paid Balance 1996 0.00 2,771,277.00 40,361.59 (1,440,252.89) 1,371,385.70 1997 1,371,385.70 1,346,934.44 67,734.52 (2,421,276.94) 364,777.72 1998 364,777.72 525,214.00 19,424.02 (732,050.23) 177,365.51 1999 177,365.51 985,191.00 19,246.30 (643,398.53) 538,404.28 2000* 538,404.28 271,383.56 30,060.79 (459,120.03) 380,728.60 Total 5,900,000.00 176,827.22 (5,696,098.62) * Through November 2000 bank statement (does not include Chugach invoices for charges incurred in November 2000) Southern Intertie AIDEA mtg.xls 12/14/2000 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Southern Intertie Transactions Inception Through November 30, 2000 Project Expenditures Year to Date Month Inception Through Ended Inception Through 12/31/99 11/01/2000 11/30/2000 Through 11/30/2000 Direct Labor $161,821.62 $26,504.72 $1,156.86 $189,483.20 Indirect Labor 61,566.25 13,274.20 572.96 75,413.41 Power Engineers 4,719,774.90 320,967.80 0.00 5,040,742.70 Miscellaneous 308,282.24 82,592.90 1,975.94 392,851.08 Total $5,251,445.01 $443,339.62 $3,705.76 $5,698, 490.38 Grant Fund Expenditures Year to Date Month Inception Through Ended Inception Through 12/31/99 11/01/2000 11/30/2000 Through 11/30/2000 Direct Charges that Chugach has been Reimbursed for $ 5,251,445.01 $ 443,339.61 $ 3,705.76 $ 5,698,490.38 Plus General, Administrative & Construction Overhead $ 26,257.22 _ $ 2,216.70 $ 18.53 $ 28,492.45 Total Amounts Paid to Chugach $ 5,277,702.23 $ 445,556.31 $ 3,724.29 $ _5,726,982.83 12/14/2000 99-00Sinterti.xls Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary November 2000 October Ending Balance Forward Total Deposits Total Withdrawals Interest Earned Balance November 30, 2000 Southern intertie bank activity.xls $386,633.33 $0.00 ($7,947.63) $2,042.90 $380,728.60 12/14/2000 SpClue{UISO0-66 6S°826'9E7'S 6° L02'622'S 92'262'6 12'S 81 '082'902'S se'Z9¢'Z6L'S ls'g6b'peL's 02'ZEt'v00'S 92'999'278'b 92°998'2z8'b 9S'¥SZ'E69"b e9o'pl2'LE9'p 19°PE6'P99'r 29°S10'LO9"b 69°CEe's6S'b 90'08S'6S'b g0°08s‘e6S'p 90'08S'c6s'r 99°6Sb'pZS'b 62°0€L'OSh'p C6 Crh LLb'y 80'Per'LSe'y SS'POE'ZLL'b 918669 Ly O8"09S'SOL'y Le'vep'sso'py LESLb'SLO'py LESLb'S1O'p €2'6zs'198'e es'6zs' 198" 9p'zS6' Le9"e Ol'sze'ize'e Z9 EL'ZLb'€ 80'6rL'eee'z eb elz'ezz'z g0'6e9'819'Z 2y'780'6S¢'Z SO'6er'z6z'Z 90'9€r'PLL'Z 6S'eer'ese'L LS'Z9¢'pe6e'L 20'z914'929'L 68°ZSZ'Orp'L v8'Ze6'297'1 78" b16'p90'L ZL LSL'S68 @p'sse'see Ze" Lez‘Z62 LU Sty 19 98°SZ9'ee9 80'SPZ'09b €7'ELS'20Z LO'pZ9'661 L0'L22'2% LO°L2L'2% seBieyo 97€Q-0}-uondesu} 6s'eZ6'967'S _l'681'92__—S8°B8Z'01z'S ayeq 0) 8417 €S'R6'Eb9 Orsec’e _— Ev z90'0rS eq 0} 120, OO'2L2'2 69's beeez'z 66-AON 66-090 €9'€06'6 Levey 9s'pse'6 66-~O 66-AON esZis'zL 8779 oe'ssp'zi 66-des 66-~O es'ZLy'6 €e'9p oo'sge'6 66-6ny 66-des ve'ege'z9 eLzle 90'9Ss'Z9 66-10 66-Sny legge'oel 6s'8¢9 zL2t2'6zb = 6e-unr 6e-nr ve'ebz'921 e998 truge'szt = 66 AeWeudy == ee-unr 00'0 000 00'0 66-AeW OZ ee9'vel z9'699 eeese'ce) GsreN ges 66udy 88'6Zb'Ss Z0°9Zz ge'e0z'ss = ee-uer eee (€6°6S1'2z) 000 (e6'6st'Zz) — punjoy S4SN an ve'eie'es oo'se v6'009'E9 + 86-98 96'189'2 veel y9'999'Z 86-AON €9'€Sl'b so'ez 86°6ZL'b 86-~O 66-494 00'0 00'0 00'0 6e-uer gooss'ces'y pg.ese'ze zb'9ZZ'OLS'b ayeG 0} 217 €z'0So'zeZ SOZIE Bt 'B0r'8zZ yeq 0} eA 00°0 000 00°0 96-280 oz‘0z1'6t i) 20°Sz0'6L g6-des 86-A0N £S'6ZE'bz1 9s'e19 tolizezL —-g6-Bny 86-0 ge'2e6'8e Ze'e6t eeeez'ge gene g6-des S9'es9'6S 18°96Z pozge'6s = ge-unr 96-Sny €S'6Li'bZt 9s'998 ZeZic'eLt ge-Xew ge-inr 6e0ze'Z zy'9e L6'€82'L seudy ge-unr ge'ezp'rs tsoze Se'ZOl'rS = S6IEW g6-AeW €s'9€1'0S vp’ erz 6o'e8'6y = 86-494 geudy 06'er6'6e S296) srosz'se geuer seudy 00'0 00'0 00'0 g67eW yS'Sbe'est 06'S9Z v'LL'est 46-080 86-494 00'0 00'0 00'0 g6e-uer EV'EzSios'e ES Iz6l pz ele'zps'e 2yeq 0} 241) vege leyz LVovo'zt 2 0€z'60b'z 23€q 0) 120, LeLLS'6zz eb@pel 6LSey'ezz —- LE-AON 2608q 9€°2Z1'097 Lb y6z'L 6h ees'esz =L6-PO L6-AON ep'e60'rel po's96 6L2zl'e6 = Le-des 26-~O 6S'7Z8S' bez eegizt g2sse'erz Le-Bny le-des S6°6Z6'pS1 os'0ZZ Slesl'psL Zeunr 2e-6ny so'0gs'6st e6°€6L zrgez'est = Ze-unr Ze-Bny tg"9gs‘6st le'e6 og'zoz'est = Ze-Aew 2e4n¢ Zb'ep9'991 20'6z8 seple'soL eudy 2e-unr 66'Z00'8/1 es'see Ort Z2b = eve 2e-Aew 2v'200'szt 06'1z9 2soge'yzl = 46-994 Leudy 80°120'S €z'sz se"svo's Ze-uer 2e7eN vv'007'80e veees'| Olzgg'90e 96-080 26-994 81'606'SEZ S9'ELL'L —OS'SEL'VEZ ~—-9E-AON 2e-uer “eezszOpyl _evsorz _Zy Z80 eh) 2yeQ 0} 2417 SO'OzEe'ZZt re2se yLZIy ZL 96-0 96-280 20° 120'e0z so‘olo's Ze0L0'zoz = ge-des 96-PO Ol'pst'eot 9s" lps ySzie'sst = g96-Bny 96-PO O€'Z0p'ZS 85'Sez zeti'zs = geunr 96-des OS'€ZL' by 09'p0z OO'6I6‘Oy = 9e-unr g6-6ny ss'909'se vr edt Ly'ezo'se g6-Aey, g6-unr 6e'6rZ'2z1 zs'se9 ZeELL'ZzL = SB ge-unr og'0e6'zZ1 seo SpOLO'7ZL = 96EW g6-Aew Se LZL'esz gs'esz'l 6zzie'lsz 96-04 96-dy @2'669'2 oc'se z6'099'2 ge-uer 964eW ve'opL ZL) ee'1e8 19'S9Z'9Z1 — S698Q-AON = 96-84 o0'0 ooo 000 ge-uer L0'LZL'2 LO'ELL 0o'vig'zz s6 Po-unr $680 Tyo HO $3809 pewnduj aed yuoy, 8910Au} Invoice Month Inception-to-Date Date Incurred Costs OH Total Charges Jan-00 Dec-89 13,496.23 67.48 13,563.71 5,250,542.30 Feb-00 Jan-00 3,892.65 19.46 3,912.11 5,254,454.41 Mar-00 Feb-00 9,362.97 46.81 9,409.78 5,263,864.19 Apr-00 Mar-00 41,813.83 209.07 42,022.90 5,305,887.09 May-00 Apr-00 20,419.98 102.10 20,522.08 5,326,409.17 Jun-00 May-00 58,113.81 290.57 58,404.38 5,384,813.55 Jul-00 Jun-00 22,827.27 114.14 22,941.41 5,407,754.96 Aug-00 Jul-00 147,084.41 735.42 147,819.83 5,555,574.79 Sep-00 Aug-00 114,403.32 572.02 114,975.34 5,670,550.13 Oct-00 Sep-00 17,513.29 87.57 17,600.86 5,688,150.99 Nov-00 Oct-00 7,908.09 39.54 7,947.63 5,696,098.62 Dec-00 Nov-00 3,705.76 18.53 3,724.29 5,699,822.91 Year to Date 460,541.61 2,302.71 462,844.32 Life to Date 5,671,330.46 28,492.45 _5,699,822.91 use USFS Reimbursement is not included in total Grant Fund Expenditures portion of Transaction Spreadsheet. 99-00Sinterti.xIs O First National Bank we tie ie tc Sos ance 000 01 00 DATE: WadesTabecslabssaelULaassHscsslDadbecsdDeseT cast botestal CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 11/30/00 PAGE: ACCOUNT: 4110003 nog / rap tr € A Ty 30) oO 0 MAIN BRANCH PO BOX 100720 ANCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 BALANCE LAST STATEMENT INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST TRANSFER INTEREST INTEREST BALANCE THIS STATEMENT DESCRIPTION TO BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 a) &i)\x DEBITS 71,947.63 CONTINUED x k *® CREDITS 67.95 67.96 67.98 204.40 68.46 68.47 68.48 68.49 205.13 68.15 68.16 68.17 68.19 204.50 68.14 68.15 136i 33 204.39 68.05 66.67 66.68 DATE 10/31/00 11/01/00 11/02/00 11/03/00 11/06/00 11/07/00 11/08/00 11/09/00 11/10/00 11/13/00 11/14/00 11/15/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 11/20/00 11/21/00 11/22/00 11/24/00 11/27/00 11/28/00 11/29/00 11/29/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 BALANCE 386,633.33 386,701.28 386,769.24 386,837.22 387,041.62 387,110.08 387,178.55 387,247.03 387,315.52 387,520.65 387,588.80 387,656.96 387), 725.23 387,793.32 387,997.82 388,065.96 388,134.11 388,270.44 388,474.83 388,542.88 380,595.25 380,661.92 380,728.60 380,728.60 = LENDER 000 O01 OO PAGE: DATE: 11/30/00 ACCOUNT: 4110003 rst National Bank of Anchorage eo CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION TOTAL CREDITS (23) 2,042.90 TOTAL DEBITS (1) 7,947.63 INTEREST THIS STATEMENT 2,042.90 INTEREST PAID 2000 30,060.79 - END OF STATEMENT - tome LENDER i. SCHEDULE CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE Mon 12/18/00 PHASE IC 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ID_|Task Name % Comp. | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 1 |ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING a i TT 9 2/|{, || RROUEGT MANAGEMENT OCT, EE | 430 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUDIES — 100% 4 EVAL & PREL.ENGINEERING 100% 5 EIS PREPARATION 28% 6 DEIS) 33% mm COMMENT PERIOD» 0% 8 ~ FEIS” B 0% 9 |AGENCIES 1 56% 10 USFWS 57% 1 RUS : 1 57% 12 USFS i 100% 13 coe, | yy | 26% 14 ROD 0% Task ES summary a led ip Progress A Split deer akmvemanedsrveae| Project: ANCHORAGE - KENAIINTE |p s Le | — | Date: Mon 12/18/00 ea otied Up Tas External Tasks Rolled Up Split Milestone P Rolled Up Milestone © Project Summary PH_IC.MPP Page 1 Iv. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL None. V. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION 1. POWER Engineer’s Monthly Report of December 15, 2000 2. Notice to Proceed to POWER Engineers of December 21, 2000 §. Agreement Settling the Anchorage-Kenai Intertie Phase I Funding Dispute SOM IENGINEERS December 15, 2000 Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive, Building A Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: POWER Project #120376 EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract No. 820/4610, Monthly Status Report No. 23 For Period November 12 — December 9, 2000 ~ Dear Dora: This report summarizes the activities completed for Task 10 during the reporting period. Activities this reporting period included completion of the AKPIRG and Flyfisher comment organization spreadsheet, project coordination and management, and project reporting. The attached Project Summary Report spreadsheet is based on the Amendment No. 2 authorized budget. This report includes the following attachments: R E c E I V E [ ) 1) Overall Financial Project Summary 2) Project Summary Report by Task DEC 1 8 2000 3) Daily Activity Logs TRANSMISSIO SPECIAL PROJECT Schedule: The IPG is currently considering how to fund the additional work required to prepare the DEIS, and pending the outcome of the IPG discussions, a schedule for preparation of the DEIS cannot be confirmed. HLY 23-522 POWER Engineers, Incorporated 3940 Glenbrook Dr. * P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey, Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association December 15, 2000 Page 2 Budget: Task 10 Budget $389,547 Task 10 Billed Through Previous Invoice $347,233 Task 10 Billed This Invoice Su 325 Task 10 Remaining Project Budget $ 40,989 Total Budget $4,300,741 Billed Through Previous Invoice $4,243,997 Billed This Invoice $ 13325 Remaining Project Budget $ 55,419 The above cost summary includes charges for PEI and EPG through December 9, 2000. Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Walbert or me. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. Ya aipafle Ziv Randy Pollock, P.E. Project Manager RP/Ik Enclosures cc: PROJECT TEAM HLY 23-522 power SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 - 120376 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY —- DECEMBER, 2000 INVOICE Project Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Total Base Not to Exceed $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 Budget ane Contract | $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 $32,866 $4,904 N/A N/A N/A N/A $103,046 Amendment No. 4 DFI Contract N/A N/A NA N/A $45,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A $45,000 Amendment No. 5 DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $11,400 N/A N/A NA NA $11,400 Amendment No. 6 DF! Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $3,502 N/A N/A N/A $3,502 Amendment No. 7 DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A $89,487 N/A N/A $89,487 Amendment No. 8 Task 5&6 NA N/A N/A $194,150 ($194,150) N/A N/A $0 Reallocation * Contract | Amendment N/A N/A N/A $31,926 N/A NA N/A N/A $31,926 No. 9 Contract | Amendment N/A N/A N/A $118,193 N/A N/A N/A N/A $118,193 No. 11 Contract 820, NA N/A N/A $465,215 N/A N/A NA $465,215 Amendment No. 1 Contract 820 | NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA N/A $389,547 $389,547 Amendment No. 2 Total Not to Exceed | $374,839 $679,591 $606,612 $336,341 $1,366,349 $53,466 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $389,547 $4,300,741 Budget Actual Budget Expended | $374,839 $679,583 $606,540 $336,315 $1,353,299 $52,250 $101,476 $202,610 $189,852 $347,233 $4,243,997 Through Previous Invoice Current Invoice Amount | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,325 $1,325 Actual Budget Expended | $374,839 $679,583 $606,540 $336,315 $1,353,299 $52,250 $101,476 $202,610 $189,852 $348,558 $4,245,322 Through Current Invoice Remaining $0 $8 $72 $26 $13,050 $1,216 $4 $45 $9 $40,989 $55,419 Budget « — Task 5 budget amount reflects the addition of Contract No. 820, Amendment No. | funds. . Task 10 budget amount reflects the addition of Contract No. 820, Amendment No. 2 funds. HLY 23-522 DAILY ACTIVITY LOG Project Name: Southern Intertie DEIS Support __ Project No: 120376-10 Project Staff Asst.: Rita Roth Period Ending: 12/09/00 Your Name: Laurie Kaufman Company: PEI Date Description of Work Performed 11/17/00 55-05-02 Scheduling/Reporting Note: Completed form to be turned in with your time sheet on Mondays. Staff Assistant will forward to the designated Project Staff Assistant for distribution/filing. HLY 23-435b(120376-05)/k DAILY ACTIVITY LOG Project Name: Southern Intertie DEIS Support Project No: 120376-10 Project Staff Asst.: Rita Roth Period Ending: 12/09/00 Your Name: Claire L. Liman Company: PEl Date Description of Work Performed 11/15/00 55-05-02 Project Scheduling/Reporting 12/05/00 | 55-05-02 Project Scheduling/Reporting Note: Completed form to be turned in with your time sheet on Mondays. Staff Assistant will forward to the designated Project Staff Assistant for distribution/filing. HLY 23-435b(120376-05)Ak DAILY ACTIVITY LOG Project Name: Southern Intertie Project- Chugach Project No: 120376-10 Project Staff Asst.: Rita Roth Period Ending: Dec. 9, 2000 Your Name: Mike Walbert Company: POWER Engineers Date Task Description of Work Performed 11/14/00 120376-10-55-05-02 Project Reporting 11/15/00 120376-10-55-05-02 Project Reporting Note: Completed form to be turned in with your time sheet on Mondays. Staff Assistant will forward to the designated Project Staff Assistant for distribution/filing. HLY 23-522b (120376-10) rr DAILY ACTIVITY LOG Project Name: Chugach — Southern Intertie Project No: 120376-10 Project Staff Asst.: Rita Roth Period Ending: 12/9/00 Your Name: Randy Pollock — Project Manger Company: PEI Date Description of Work Performed 11-15-00 55-05-01 Project Coordination and AKPIRG & Fly fisher spreadsheet 11-17-00 55-05-01 Project Coordination and AKPIRG & Fly fisher spreadsheet 11-27-00 55-05-01 Project Coordination and AKPIRG & Fly fisher spreadsheet 12-7-00 55-05-01 Project Management & Coordination 12-8-00 55-05-01 Project Management & Coordination Note: Completed form to be turned in with your time sheet on Mondays. Staff Assistant will forward to the designated Project Staff Assistant for distribution/filing. HLY 23-435b(120376-05)k 12/15/00 Page 1 of 2 TAS Tech/Environmental Support 4TH QUARTER 1999 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 1ST QUARTER 2000 2ND QUARTER 2000 3RD QUARTER 2000 THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 12-09-00 4TH QUARTER 2000 | ‘Actual % Work Completed* | 0% 2% 11% 14%, 20%] 38% 67% 79% 128% 128% 134% 134% 134% 134%| | Planned % Complete $ (to date) | [ PC (OUT UT dT ; | { [ Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 2%| 11% | 14% 29% 38% 67% 79%| 128% 128% 134%| 134% 134% 134%| | __ Planned $ (this period) 7 | | | | | a i | | Actual $ Expended (this period) | $366 $3,903 | $15,627 $3,982 $27,330 | $14,804 | $52, 203 $19,732 | $86,328 $0 $11,436 | $0 $0| «$0 Planned $ (to date) : | | | | | | aa | = Actual $ Expended (to date). $366 $4,269 | $19,896 $23,878 $51,209 | $66013 [$118,216 $137,948 $224,276 $224,276 $235,712] $235,712 $235,712 $235,712 Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 $175,265 | $175,265 $175,265 |$175,265 $175,265 $175,265 [$175,265 | $175,265 $175,265 $175,265 | $175,265 $175,265 | $175,265 | $175,265 Actual Remaining Task Budget $174,899 | $170,996 | $155,369 $151,387 $124,056 | $109,252 | $57,049 $37,317 ($49,011)| ($49,011)| ($60,447) ($60,447), ($60,447) ($60,447) Actual $ Expended (this period) _ Planned $ (to date) Actual. $ Expended (to date) Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 10-2 |Public Involvement | | \ Actual % Work Completed _ | 0% 0% 0% | 0% —-0%| = 0%] ~—S(O% 0%| 25% ~~ 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%| Planned % Complete $ (to date) | | | i | EE _ oo | | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% 0% 0%| 26%| “30% 80% 80% 80% 80% L Planned $ (this period) ee oe {| { | fe fe | | Actual $ Expended (this period) | $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 | $22,703 | $48,183 | $0 $0 | $0 sa ____ Planned $(todate) _ _ n| _| ee ee ee ee ee _ ee | _ Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 | $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 | $22, 703 $70, 886 $70, 886 $70,886 $70,886 $70,886 Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 | $88,603 | $88,603 | $88,603 | $88, 603 | $88,603 | $88,603 $88,603 | $88,603 | $88,603 $88,603 $88, 603 | $88,603 $88,603 $88,603 | Actual Remaining Task Budget | $88,603 $88,603 | $88,603 $88,603 $88,603 | $88,603 | $88,603 $88,603 | $65,900 $17,717 $17,717 | $17,717 $17,717__ $17,717 10-3 |Mailing List | | | | | | | | Actual % Work Completed | 0% 0% 0%| 0% O%| = 0% =O 0%| 2% 2%| 2%| «2% 2%! 2% Planned % Complete $ (to date) | - | | te | | = | | ; Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ai 2% 2% 2% 2%! 2% Planned $ (this period) _ l { iim _ fo | - | | _ | Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $403 | $0 | $0 $0 | $0 | $0 ______ Planned $ (to date) | i | oo fe / | | | | [| Actual $ Expended (to date) _| $0 | $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $403 $403 | $403 $403 | $403 | $403 Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 |° $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 $19,040} $19, 040 $19,040 | $19,040 Actual Remaining Task Budget | $19,040 | $19,040 | $19,040 $19,040 | $19,040| $19,040 | $19, ' $18,637 $18,637 $18,637] $18,637 $18,637) $18,637 10-4 |Print & Distribute DEIS/EIS NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME | | | | Actual % Work Completed | | | - | | Planned % Complete $ (to date) | _ | | — | _ 7 Actual % Expended $ (to date) | Planned $ (this period) | [ | | [ [ _ | = == F | | Actual Remaining Task Budget 11/08/99 Contract 820 Amendment No. 2 HLY 23-522a 12/15/00 Page 2 of 2 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PM & Schedule Admin. 4TH QUARTER 1999 1ST QUARTER 2000 THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 12-09-00 2ND QUARTER 2000 3RD QUARTER 2000 4TH QUARTER 2000 3% 16%) 20% 24% $8,584 | Actual % Work Completed 5% 6%| 9% 11%| 13%| 18% 21% | 31% 47% | 49% Planned % Complete $ (to date) | _ ei ieee esc cee ee et i [oe | il Zz | | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 3% 5% 6% 9% | 11% 13% 16%, 18% 19% 21% 24% 31% 47% 49% Planned $ (this period) ie | Se | ae | : = | Actual $ Expended (this period) | $2,260 $1,686] $1,010| $2,228 $1,551| $1,167| $2,486 $1,652 $548 $1,790 $1,886] $5,471 $12,579 $1,325 Planned $ (to date) | | | | | Actual $ Expended (to date) $2,260 $3,946| $4,956 $7,184 $8,735] $9,902] $12,388 | $14,040] $14,588 $16,378 $18,264| $23,735 $36,315 $37,640 Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 |. $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 | $76,935 $76,935 $76,935| $76,935 $76,935 $76,935 Actual Remaining Task Budget | $74,675 $72,989 | $71,979 | $69,751 $68,200| $67,033 | $64,547 $62,895 | $62,347 $60,557 $58,671| $53,200 $40,620 $39,295 10-6 [Update MOU | ~ Actual % Work Completed 0% | 0% 50% | 50% 50% 50% 100% 100%] 100% 100% 100%] 100%| 100% + ==: 100% | Planned % Complete $ (to date) | | | | fi ‘ oe eee ee Sueeees Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% | 0% | 31% 31% 31% | 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31%. 31% te ete ee) cee eet eee secre eee Actual $ Expended (this period) _ _ $0 | $0 | oe a EB $3,917| + $0 $0. [as S0 $0 $0 $0]... $0] $0 _ $0 Planned $(todate) fT | _| S| Sites aieedteaes eaonoate Boe ~ Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 | $0 $3,917| $3,917] $3,917. sai $3,917 | $3,917 $3,917| $3,917. $3,917. $3,917 Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 | $12,501 | $12,501 | $12,501 | $12,501 $12,501 | $12,501 | $12,501 $12,501| $12,501 $12,501 $12,501| $12,501 $12,501. $12,501 | Actual Remaining Project Budget $8,584 | $8,584 | 4 $8,584 $8,584 $8,584 | $8,584 $8,584 $8,584 10-7 Brief Corps of Engineers $12,501 | $12,501 $12,501 $12,501 | $8,584 | Actual % Work Completed 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% | “Planned % Complete $ (to date) | 50% | 100% | 100%! 100% 100% 100% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% | 0%| 0% 0% 0% 0% | Planned $ (this period) 0% Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 | $0 $0. 0. $0 Planned $ (to date) $0 | Actual $ Expended (to date) Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 $17,203 | $17,203 $0 | $17,203 | $17,203 | $0 $0 $17,203 | $17,203 $0 | $17,203 | $17,203 of $17,203 | $0 $17,203 | $0 $17,203 $0 $17,203 | $0 $17,203 $0 | _$17, 203 | 11/08/99 Co Actual Remaining Task Budget | $17,203 $17,203 $17,203 | $17,203 | $17,203 | $17,203 | $17,203 | $17,203 $17,203 | $17,203 ~ $17,203 | $17,203 | $17,203 | $17,203 PHASE 10 TOTAL Actual % Work Completed 1% 2% 6%. 8%, 16% 20% 35% «40%| = 68% 81% 85% = 86% 89% 89%| Planned % Complete $ (to date) (ete | | | | | fe Pee | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% | 2% 6% | 8%) 16%| 20% 35%) 40% 68% | 81% 85% 86% 89% | 89% le Planned $ (this period) | | | eelaea | =i] | el Ce | ia Actual $ Expended (this period) | $2,626 | $5,589 | $16,637 | $6,210 $32,798 | $15,971 | $54,689 $21,384 |$109,982 $49,973 $13,322] $5,471 $12,579 $1,325 Planned $ (to date) fT, | | a fey ene Ee (er Nt | ba Actual $ Expended (to date) $2,626 | $8,215 | $24,852 | $31,062 | $63,861 | $79,832 |$134,521 $155,905 |$265,887 $315,860 | $329,182 | $334,653 $347,233 $348,558 Contract No. 820, Amend. No. 2 | $389,547 | $389, 547 |$389,547 |$389,547 | $389,547 [$389,547 |$389,547 | $389,547 |$389,547 $389,547 $389,547 | $389,547 | $389,547 | $389,547 Remaining Phase 10 Budget | $386,921 | $381,332 |$364,695 ($358,485 | $325,686 |$309,715 |$255,026 | $233,642 |$123,660 $73,687 | $60,365| $54,894 $42,314 | _ $40,989 Notes: * The Actual Percent complete is the same as the Actual — Expended because the work scope is reactive to requests from RUS for support to the preparation of the DEIS, rather than for a Be ceategetee eee | eerie specifically defined scope of work. ————_ August, 2000 Task 1 charges have been allocated to Task 2. eee Seeucee ar SRucececaseceuccuaaese cuca saaeERUCaEERICEEE: 4 B [ HUY 23-5228 / HC, — : —— POWERING ALASKA’S FUTURE December 21, 2000 Via fax line: (208) 788-2082 Mr. Randy Pollock, P.E. POWER Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 1066 Hailey, Idaho 83333 Subject: Southern Intertie, Phase IC - Chugach Contract # 4610 (old#820; 95-208), Power Project # 120376 DEIS Preparation — Your Proposal of October 11, 2000, Amendment 4610-1 Notice to Proceed Dear Mr. Pollock: This letter will serve as your notice to proceed with the work described in subject proposal. We have adjusted the schedule to take the delayed start into account and are enclosing the revision of December 12, 2000 to be included with this amendment. Please return a copy of this letter signed to acknowledge your agreement with the terms noted and we will process a contract amendment covering this work. Sincerely, bhya A LOY Agreed: Dora L. Gropp, P.E. Date: Manager, Transmission & Special Projects Randy Pollock, POWER Engineers, Inc. DLG/ah anaulise worddocs\gropp south te\deiseip1200 doc Enclosures cs IPG GMs Larry Wolfe/RUS Mike Walbert, PEI Mike Massin Dan Knecht W.O. E9590081, Sec.7.1. RF Chugach Electric Association, Inc. 5601 Minnesota Drive, PO. Box 196300, Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 © 1907) 563-7494 Fax (907) 562-0027 © (800) 478-7494 www.chugachelectric.com ¢ info@chugachelectric.com SWOUWER JENGINEERS October 11, 2000 R'Sfiven Ms. Dora Gropp OCT 17 2000 Chugach Electric Association, Inc. 5601 Minnesota Drive, Bldg. A ISMISSivs! & Anchorage, AK 99518 PROJECT Subject: 120376-10 Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Scope of Work / Estimate of Costs to Prepare PDEIS and DEIS Dear Dora: As you requested, the purpose of this letter is to provide a description of the scope of work and estimate of costs to prepare the PDEIS and DEIS based on the approach discussed with the federal agencies at the September 28, 2000 meeting in Anchorage. Attached to this letter are the following: e A table summarizing the estimated costs to complete the tasks described in the scope of work. The table includes the costs for PEI_and EPG and their subcontractors. e A letter from EPG outlining the overall scope of work, and EPG and subcontractor costs to complete their portion of the scope of work. e A schedule for completion of the scope of work. This schedule is essentially the schedule provided by RUS at the September 28 meeting. The only change to the schedule is to provide for the PDEIS review at a team meeting in Seattle, instead of a teleconference. Given a Notice to Proceed by November 6, 2000, the PDEIS would be available for review in 4 months, by March 6, 2001. Should you have any questions or require clarification of the scope of work or estimated costs, please let me know. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. (en0, (0b R__ Randy Pollock, P.E. Senior Project Manager RP/lk Enclosure(s) Sent Via: Fax, US Mail cc: Garlyn Bergdale (EPG) Mike Walbert (Power) File: 120376-10 HLY 24-656 POWER Engineers, Incorporated (RS ORE SRO al TT 3940 Glenbrook Dr. + P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey, Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-2082 Southern Intertie Project $250 $250 Proposed Budget for PDEIS and DEIS Preparation Power Engineers, Inc. and EPG, Inc. Project Management j 0 : Fo Monthly Reporting $0 $0 - $ $ eS eae $33,780 $7,200] $40,980 $820] $41,799 Coordination 2 Mangi Comment Spreadsheet 3 AKPIRG & Flyfisher Spreadsheet | 5 __|Prepare PDEIS 6 __|Prepare DEIS $5,648] $300] $5,948] $35,962] $9,090[ $45,052] $901 7___ [Mailing List gol Sof SO $22,966[ $1,975] $24,941 | 8__{Print & DistributeDEIS__|_— $o]_ SO) | ___|Total Budget $9,920] $80,576 Notes: meetings in Anchorage on September 28, 2000. 2. See Task descriptions in the letter attachment dated October 9, 2000 from EPG for an explanation of the work scope proposed. 3. Task 0 - Project Management, is based on a project duration of 5 months from notice to proceed. 3. The overall scope of work required to be completed by Power Engineers and EPG cannot be precisely known at this time. The actual scope of work required from Power Engineers and EPG will depend on the demands of the agencies and IPG throughout the DEIS preparation process. Accordingly, this proposed budget is only an estimate. More or less effort, and consequently adjustments to this Task Task Description Environmental Planning Group Totals [Labor [Expenses] Subtotal | Labor [Expenses] L&E | 2% | Subtotal | | 4 |Cumulative Impacts 1. This budget is for the work scope estimated for PE! and EPG to prepare the DEIS per the scope of work discussed at the agency budget (+/-) and the associated scope of work may be appropriate as a result of changes in the Project schedule or work scope. HLY 24-656a (10/11/00) OCT-12-00 THU U6:50 AM October 11, 2000 Randy Pollock Power Engineers P.O. Box 1066 Ilailey, Idaho 83333 Re: Southern Intertie Project — Preliminary Draft and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scope of Work Dear Randy: Included in this document is the Scope of Work and Cost Estimate as discussed in the Septernber 28 conference call. The result of this scope will be a Draft Environmental! Impact Statement (DEIS) appropriate for public review. Two additional documents, Mangi Comment Spreadsheet and AKPIRG/Flyfisher Spreadshect, wil] be developed and maintained throughout the document preparation process, but will not be included in the DEIS. Environmental Planning Group, Inc. (EPG) will assist RUS in the preparation of the DEIS. The task breakdown and cost assumptions were based on the draft process milestone schedule (sec attached). Our cost estimate does not include the cost of EPG to attend the public mectings (Washington DC and Alaska) noted on the schedule. Task 1 — Coordination and Meetings — FPG will track and coordinate all project activities. EPG will arrange two planning tcam meetings to be held throughout the duration of the project (Garlyn Bergdale, ‘Tim Tetherow, Amy Jerome, Randy Pollock, and other resource staff as necded). The first team meeting will take place upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed. To assist with coordination and consistency, two conference calls per month arc anticipated throughout the project. A mecting to review the PDEIS was scheduled and estimated in early Spring 2001. We fecl a face-to-face meeting would be preferred and assumed, for the cost estimate, the meeting would be held in Scattle. The agencies may choose a teleconference format for this mecting which would result in a minimal cost differential. Task 2 — Mangi Comment Spreadsheet -- The comment spreadshcet developed for the Mangi Preliminary DEIS will be maintained throughout the process of developing the DEIS. This document will serve as the administrative record for DEIS preparation. ‘The document will be managed by EPG through the PL on-line project site. Members of the project team will have full on-line access to this document and updates will be posted throughout the document proccss. The resulting spreadsheet wil] reference wherc in the DEIS each comment has been addressed. 4350 E. Camelback Rd, * Suite G-200 © Phoenix, Arizona 85018 602-956-4270 + 602-956-4374 fax * www.epgaz.com S.\projecte\St¥\Projoot Work \AmessmenI\POEIS\EPG Wark Scope Description due OCT-12-00 THU 06:50 AM Randy Pollock October 11, 2000 Page 2 Task 3 - AKPIRG and Flyfisher Spreadsheet — A spreadsheet containing the AKPIRG and | Alaska Flyfisher comments will be developed prior to the approval of this Scope of Work. These comments will be tracked and addressed in the DEIS. This document will be managed by EPG and will be available for viewing in an on-line format. The resulting spreadsheet will reference where in the DEIS each comment has been addressed. Costs to the environment will be taken into consideration by the fedcral agencics in formulating their Record of Decision. These costs will not be addressed in the NEPA documents (DEIS/FFIS). Task 4 - Cumulative Impacts — EPG will provide a separate section for cumulative impacts in the DEIS. The main source for this section will be the EVAL; however, additional updated and supplemented information also will be necessary. Local data gathering will be necessary to address these issues. The "railbelt" area will be addresscd in this section. Only resources affected (e.g., migratory birds, socioeconomics, visual) will be addressed in the largest region. Progressively larger number of "reccptors" will be impacted as the region narrows to Kenai and then the northern KNWR. Specific attention will be paid to the following items: u Alaska Railbelt impacts (rates, biology, visual/land use) - primarily mapping and descriptions of major flyway issues, utility rate changes and public lands/community highway land use and visual impacts; also relates Northern and Southern Intcrtie Projects for cumulative impacts = Kenai Peninsula impacts (biology, visual, and Jand use) m the Screening of alternatives (Beluga Alternative and Quartz Creek Alternative) Task 5 — Prepare Preliminary DEIS -- PG will manage the preparation of the Preliminary DEIS document. Thc EVAL will be used as the primary source for the Preliminary DEIS. EPG will also manage the collection and analysis of additional information necded to supplement or update the information contained in the EVAL. Costs were based on the following assumptions: = Mangi will not participate in Preliminary DEIS review process. = On-site verification and data collection is necessary to update the land use and visual information for the Preliminary DEIS. s Maps will be reduced to 11 X 17 size, if possible (smaller maps may not be legiblc). a Production of the Preliminary DEIS will be handled by EPG. Production of the DEIS for public review will also be handled by EPG. « USFWS will provide language for new subsistence designation by January 2001. # RUS will narrow the Anchorage alternatives. = RUS will be responsible for the adaptation and preparation of Chapters 1 and 2 of the EVAL into the Preliminary DIS. EPG will incorporate that re-writc/adaptation into the Preliminary DEIS. PUI will be available for consultation regarding the preparation of OCT-12-00 THU 06:51 AM bases Randy Pollock October 11, 2000 Page 3 Chapters 1 and 2, but PEI has not budgcted to actively participate in the re- write/adaptation. = All topics identified for USFWS response in the August 2 to 4 spreadsheet will be answered by October 31, 2000. (as per Dora Gropp’s email October 3, 2000) a Threatened and Endangered specics will need to be updated along with the USFWS agency consultation. Flying squirrel to be added to appropriate species lists. Update Beluga whales information for the Cook Inlet. = Anchorage Block Data will be analyzed. The 2000 census data will be reviewed for Kenai and Anchorage if it becomes available in time. us The impact assessment for the KNWR will not have to be redone. Additional language will be provided by USFWS to explain that any impact in the KNWR remaining after mitigation will be significant due to the nature and purpose of the refuge. = New planning documents for Anchorage and Kenai areas need to be incorporated into the review. Landuse and visual resources will bce updated especially in Anchorage arca. = USFWS will provide information on possible additional sites to be addressed as historic or Spiritual places. Task 6 — Prepare DEIS — Alter intemal release of the Preliminary DEIS, team members will review the document. EPG will manage the collection of revicw comments and will revise the Preliminary DEIS by incorporating appropriate comments from the revicw into the document. The result of this task is the camera ready DEIS. Task 7 ~ Prepare and Maintain Mailing List — EPG will establish a mailing list to be used throughout the preparation of the FIS. The list will be developed initially using the address database we maintained during the preparation of the EVAL and will be supplemented as additional names and addresses are provided as a result of the public notification process. ‘The list will include names and addresses of federal, tribal. state, county and local agencies, relevant businesses; organizations and special interest groups; and interested individuals. Microsoft Access database will be uscd for filing and storing the list. Task 8 — Print and Distribute DEIS — Both hard copies and electronic copics of the DEIS will be available to the public. An estimate for printing 250 copies of the Draft EIS has becn prepared on an estimate from a printer for $200 per copy. A 20% factor was added to the estimate for budgeting purposes. If more than 250 copies are required, the unit cost per copy would apply. Costs were also included for the development and distribution of a CDROM which would include the DEIS. Developing the CD will include processing all files for inclusion on the CD, development of appropriate navigation tools, the final quality control check and the coordination of the CDROM production. Costs for this task include the mailing of the Draft ETS. S.\projcctASIMAProjew Work \Asscsement\PDEIS\EPG Work Seaje Dexcription loc OCT-12-00 THU 06:51 AM 1 Randy Pollock i October 11, 2000 Page 4 We anticipate the eight tasks listed above to be completed according to the attached schedule. Please sce the attached Cost Estimate, which was developed to support the above tasks. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Amy Jerome or me. ! Enclosures: Cost Estimate Schedulc EPG’s Cost Estimate for Chugach Electric - Southern Intertie Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cost Estimate , 11-Oct-00 J.F. Sato Labor $12,516.00] $9,240.00] $5,292.00] $37,488.00] $61,272.00 Dames & Moore Labor $490.88 Robert Mott Labor $0.00 $0.00 $0.00} $2,400.00 SUBTOTAL LABOR $33,779.65 | $25,283.36| $16,990.18 | $110,359.76 | $201,375.80 35,962.48 | $22,965.76 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES $7,200.00| $1,775.00} _$1,325.00| $24,725.00} $32,745.00} _$9,090.00| $1,975.00 $25,334.9. 98,482.41 $4,032.00 47,438.00 $0.00) 3963.: $0.00} $28,200. $29,366.94) $476,083.9: $40,979.65] $27,058.36} $18,315.18} $135,084.76 . $24,940.76 C:\TEMP\EPG Costs.doc $83,010.00| $161,845.00 $112,376.94 3 ACTIVITY Southern Intertie Project ANILCA and NEPA Process Milestone Schedule RESPONSIBILITY AND COMPLETION DATES ANILCA APPLICATION Duration Activity Start/Finish Responsibility | 08/05/99 xX ANILCA Application Review 08/05/99 10/04/99 Revised Schedule Start Date 01/01/01 DRAFT EIS 02/15/00 10/20/00 Hl Forward Mangi & AKPIRG comments ion EVAL to Agencies & Applicant Prepare Draft PDEIS Review & Provide Comments on Draft PDEIS Mangi review of PDEIS Comments Review Meeting in Seattle, WA Consultants submit cost estimate to Applicant 02/22/00 02/24/00 x x 0672700 06/15/00 07/20/00 xX 07/24/00 07/28/00 3 os/a2r00 | 08704700 | __x 08/02/00 08/31/00 > Consultants obtain and submit additonal information to Agencies ND So 01/01/01 05/01/01 Prepare PDEIS Review & Provide Comments on PDEIS Ready Copy to Applicant Publish Federal Register Notice DEIS PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD Hold Public Meetings 150 01/01/01 05/31/01 06/10/01 Or 06/01/04 Ny x 06/13/01 16/14/01 | : 30 06/15/01 07/15/01 07/18/01 08/10/01 08/08/01 08/17/01 21 X i Washington, D.C. RUS-NEPA-SCHEDULE-1212.XLSEIS_ANIL_SCHED 08/17/01 08/17/01 x x | X x 2 Ld 12/21/00 Southern | ntertie Project ANILCA and NEPA Process Milestone Schedule RE Activity Start/Finish Duration DON "Y AND COMPLETION DATES | Responsibility ACTIVITY FEIS PREPARATION Consolidate Comments & Distribute for Preparation of Responses front | oarterae | 10/18/01 10/26/01 APPLICANT 10/18/01 _| Prepare Responses to Comments 12/17/01 Pp xX | x Assemble Errata Sheets and Comments and Responses Review Assembled Responses Prepare Draft FEIS 12/18/01 12/31/01 01/11/02 12/28/01 12/18/01 01/31/02 ee pox TX XX [ee | | Xe Review & Provide Comments on Draft FEIS ‘Complete FEIS & Transmit Camera Ready Copy to Applicant 02/03/02 02/07/02 02/10/02 03/02/02 Print & Distribute FEIS * Publish Federal Register Notice 03/05/02 03/19/02 FEIS PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD | 03/29/02 | 04/28/02 | | PREPARE & ISSUE RECORD OF DECISION Gebeie Preparation of Responses dsroa/o2 | _o6/17102 0621/02 06/24/02 a RUS-NEPA-SCHEDULE-1212.XLSEIS_ANIL_SCHED 12/21/00 Southern Intertie Project ANILCA and NEPA Process Milestone Schedule Notes: 1. Acceptance of the ANILCA application within the 60 day review period triggers the following schedule: DEIS ready 9months after application is submitted - can be extended per 43CFR, Part 36.6.a(2) FEIS ready 3 months after DEIS is published - or 12 months after application; ROD 4 months after FEIS is published - no extension. 2. DEIS and FEIS must be filed with EPA in Washington, DC. EPA EIS notices are only published in the Federal Register on Friday. Notices must be filed with EPA at least 1 week prior to the date of publication. The EIS comment period starts with the publication of the EPA Federal Register notice. 3. RUS will publish its own Federal Register notices announcing the availability of the DEIS, FEIS and ROD. *Assumes that an Applicant chosen printer can be used. RUS-NEPA-SCHEDULE-1212.XLSEIS_ANIL_SCHED 12/21/00 Transmission Report DateTime Local 1D Local Name 12-21-00; 4:34PM 907 762 4617 Trans&Spcil.Prijicts. company Logo Chugach Electric Association This document was confirmed. (reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter-S HUGG: December 21, 2000 Via fax line: (208) 768-2062 Mr. Randy Pollock, P.E. POWER Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 1056 Hailey, Idaho 83333 ‘Subject: ‘Southern Intertic, Phase IC - Chugach Contract # 4610 (old#820; 95-208), Power Project # 129376 DELS Preparation — Your Proposal of October 11, 2000, Amendment 46-0-1 ‘Notice to Proceed Dear Mr, Pollock: ‘Tais lemer will serve as your cocice to proceed with the work described in subject proposal. We have adyented the schedule to take the delayed start into account and are enclosing the revision of December 12, 2000 to be included with this aesendment. Please 7eturn 2 copy of this Jetter signed to acknowledge your agreement with the terms noted end we ‘wil process a contract amendment covering this work. ‘Smeerety, bn % fH DoraL. Gropp, PE. Manager, Transmission & Special Projects DLGiah Enclosures a Dt ‘Randy Pollock, POWER Engineers, Inc. = IPOGMs Lamy WolfeRUS Mike Walbert, PEI Mike Massir. Daa Knecht W.O. B959008 1, See.7.1. edric Association, he SENG» POM ICIP Gyn ISO7s FIO am = win shgermelucere cor Cages 2eD4 shomairio Ones PO Sau 190500, anrereae + aon, coves 7011" Total Pages Confirmed : 11 Total Pages Scanned No. |Boc}|Remote Station Stert Time Duration|Pages Mode |Comments/Resuits 1}/O040|/PE! 7 Hailey 12-21-00; 4:31PM 3°35” se 8s ec cP 14400 ** Notes ** EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multt—Poltl PG: Polling a Remote Pl: Power Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory OR: Document Removed TT: Terminated by user LS: Local Scan LP: Local Print FO: Forced Output wT: Waiting Transfer RECEIVER DEC 26 2000 Agreement settling the TRANSMISSION & Anchorage-Kenai Intertie Phase I funding dispute SPECIAL PROJECT This agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into effective November 20, 2000 by and among the Parties hereto, namely the ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & EXPORT AUTHORITY (AIDEA), GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL LIGHT & POWER, CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., ALASKA ELECTRIC GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of its member Homer Electric Association, Inc. and the CITY OF SEWARD herein referred to collectively as Settling Utilities. RECITALS 1. AIDEA and the Settling Utilities are parties to that certain Grant Administration Agreement dated August 30, 1994 (the “Grant Administration Agreement”). 2. Pursuant to Section 4.02(a) of the Grant Administration Agreement, the Participating Utilities have requested that AIDEA approve an increase in the Phase I funding ceiling for the Anchorage-Kenai Intertie (the “Southern Intertie”). 3. The Parties to this Agreement have a dispute over the authority of AIDEA to restrict use of grant funds for the Southern Intertie. 4. AIDEA has reviewed the progress to date with respect to the Southern Intertie and found it to be adequate. An Environmental Analysis (EVAL) dated July 1999 has been completed by the applicant in coordination with the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Work to date has followed stringent guidelines in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The next steps include completion of the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), final EIS and Record of Decision (ROD) under the guidance of RUS as lead agency and USFWS and the Corps of Engineers as cooperating agencies. 5. The Construction Manager has apprised AIDEA monthly of its progress and will continue to include a detailed schedule of events in each monthly report. The current schedule (Monthly report for September 2000) anticipates a Record of Decision in mid 2002. However, requests for supplemental data, appeals from third parties, potential litigation and other events are difficult to control and could impact this schedule. 6. Delay of the project could cause additional costs which electric customers could ultimately bear. 7. Settlement under the terms set out in this Agreement will better serve the public than continuing the dispute. AGREEMENT SETTLING THE ANCHORAGE-KENAI INTERTIE PHASE I 1 FUNDING DISPUTE AGREEMENT In consideration of the recitals above (which are a part of this Agreement) the Parties agree as follows: ie Neither AIDEA nor the Settling Utilities shall be considered to have waived rights or arguments they may have to support their position in any future disagreements over issues not specifically covered by this Agreement. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not be used as evidence in any proceeding except one brought to enforce this Agreement and specifically that this Agreement does not constitute evidence in support of a conclusion as to the merits of the dispute over AIDEA’s authority. . The Settling Utilities, agree to pay from their own funds 25% of the remaining costs of Phase I of the Southern Intertie (as defined in Schedule A-2 to the Grant Administration Agreement) provided the total costs of Phase I do not exceed $10 million. Specifically, the Settling Utilities have agreed among themselves to pay the above 25% of the remaining Phase I costs and any costs pursuant to paragraph 6, below, according to the following allocations among them: Chugach Electric 35.230% City of Seward 01.678% GVEA 23.435% HEA 13.518% ML&P 26.139% These amounts paid under this Agreement shall be recognized as contributions by each contributing Participant of Design and Construction costs and shall be considered an advance of additional financing by each contributing Participant for Design and Construction Costs that exceed the sum total of the Grant Funds plus available interest thereon as provided under Section 8(b) of the Participants Agreement. AIDEA agrees to release grant funds for 75% of the remaining costs of Phase I of the Southern Intertie provided the total costs of Phase I do not exceed $10 million. Subject to limitations on Phase II Expenditures set forth in Section 4.02(b) of the Grant Administration Agreement, in the event the Southern Intertie project proceeds to Phase II, AIDEA agrees that the Participating Utilities will not be required to fund Phase II expenditures for the Southern Intertie until after the Southern Intertie grant principal and interest have been exhausted. The Settling Utilities agree to indemnify, defend and hold AIDEA harmless with respect to any actions, damages and claims of whatever nature brought by Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. with respect to this Agreement, including, without limitation, claims AGREEMENT SETTLING THE ANCHORAGE-KENAI INTERTIE PHASE I 2 FUNDING DISPUTE with respect to AIDEA’s release of project funds in accordance with this Agreement, claims that this Agreement or performance in accordance with this Agreement is inconsistent, violates, or creates a breach under the Grant Administration Agreement and/or claims that this Agreement or performance under this Agreement is inconsistent with statutory requirements related to the Southern Intertie grant ALASKA INDUSTRIAL CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, DEVELOPMENT & EXPORT INC. AUTHORITY . ee Its eetive LU) Its Aaa an “CUSTODIAN AND “CONSTRUCTION MANAGER” ADMINISTRATOR OF INTERTIE GRANTS” THE CITY OF SEWARD GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC d/b/a SEWARD ELECTRIC SYSTEM ASSOCIATION, INC. By Its_& 4h Leones HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, THE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE INC. (for itself and on behalf of its d/b/a MUNICIPAL LIGHT & POWER interest AEG&T) By ~ Its Its Ceneke/ Wan aspen “PARTICIPANTS” AGREEMENT SETTLING THE ANCHORAGE-KENAI INTERTIE PHASE I 3 FUNDING DISPUTE