Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S Intertie report 6-1998
gach ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE, AK 99519-6300 CHUGACH ELECTRIC x ASSOCIATION, INC. iM nigeck ASSOCIATION, INC. June 29, 1998 EGE) VE Alaska Industrial Development JUL 01 998 and Export Authority Ae 480 West Tudor Road Alaska Industrial Developme Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 and Export Authority Attention: Mr. Randy Simmons, Executive Director Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for June 1998 W.0.#E9590081 Dear Mr. Simmons: Please find enclosed 1 (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for the Month of June 1998. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. Sincerely, We, Kd 7 General an ENG: Besos Enclosures: 1 (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report c: Lee Thibert Joe Griffith Michael Massin Dora Gropp Jim Borden Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.0.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Report for the Month of June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. SUM MARRY cccccrratatsatestestareerascsstcsretetretatantaseateetattsstraacasteatateaseatrarscateat’oraseataanateatassastasenteases 1 IEies BINA CIA Diiinsccccescacscocecsnzeraseresnasucsevsseeussecserasecsaacsneseesensensnstereanasenaseesesteasenssraeceseeasenseesearses 2 4. TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES AS OF MAY 1998 2. CHUGACH STATEMENT FOR APRIL 1998 3. BANK STATEMENT FOR MARCH, APRIL AND MAY 1998 lll, SCHEDULE... IV SITEMSIFORVARPROV Alitsereccsreszeresceereteaseesegsseasessaresesseatecsnuereateessaseess=aseasnaeanssesessvacseasees=s% 4 NONE. Vimar TEMS IEOR. DISCUSSION iasrercercceteceerceretssenssesesesestoreeseceasusaerecusaustrcestesunescasccsceassescescacesases 5 NONE. Vi. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION...............s:sscssssssssssesssssssstesssseessessesssessesseeseessensessenseesseesseseeses 6 4: USFWS LETTER OF MAY 1,1998 WITH A REVISED COST ESTIMATE FOR OVERALL COSTS 2: POWER ENGINEERS LETTER OF MAY 26,1998 WITH A COST ESTIMATE FOR THE EIS SUPPORT 3. LETTER FROM USDA/RUS WITH A COST ESTIMATE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE EIS JUNE 12, 1998 4. POWER ENGINEERS’ MONTHLY REPORT PHASE IB - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, JUNE 17, 1998 ii E SUMMARY Power Engineers/Dames and Moore’s effort is with 97% completion on schedule. A contract increase in the amount of $32,000 has been approved by the IPG at their meeting on June 15,1998. The additional funds will come from contingencies included in the original funding allocations. They will cover expenses for additional field work for photographic simulations requested by the USFWS, inclusion of fiber optic facilities in the EIS and gathering additional data to support the “Purpose and Need’ statement in the EIS. An interagency meeting (RUS/USFS/USFWS) has been scheduled for June 23 to 25,1998 to discuss the final EVAL and the completion of the DEIS. The meetings will take place at Dames and Moore's Offices in Anchorage at 5600 B Street. Additional funds in the amount of $800,000 have been approved by the IPG (meetings of 02/25/98 and 06/15/98) and AIDEA’s Board of Directors on June 16,1998. These funds will be added to the moneys remaining from the original allocations under Phase | of the project to support the USFS/USFWS efforts related to the ANILCA application ($35,000) as well as RUS/Mangi’s work to incorporate ANILCA requirements into the DEIS/EIS ($150,000) and our consultants’ continued assistance to the agencies ($730,000). Letters supporting the funding request are included in Section VI. Chugach’s General Manager and the Project Manager made a presentation to AIDEA’s Board of Directors to support the request for additional funding. The IPG also authorized expenditures for the single audit required under state laws for the project at the 06/15/98 meeting. The 1997 audit was performed by KPMG Peat Marvick and submitted in April 1998. Costs were $6,000. DESCRIPTION POWER USFS/USFWS |CHUGAC | TOTAL ENGINEERS RUS H BUDGET | enman $100,000} $400,000} $3,543,423 ALLOCATED CONTINGENCY | 19.9841 $0} $40,000) $59,981 TOTAL | $3,063,404] $100,000} $440,000} $3,603,404 AMENDMENTS | $284,361 $23,315 $0} $307,676 TOTAL COMMITMENT $3,347,765 $123,315] $440,000} $3,911,080) SPENT TO DATE $3,244,121 $119,115] $144,140} $3,507,376 % OF TOTAL 97% 97%| 33% 90% Total Project expenditures, as of 6/19/98 is $4,365,370 1 Il. = FINANCIAL 1. Total project expenditures as of May 1998 rt Chugach Statement for April 1998 3. Bank Statement for March, April and May 1998 Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Southern Intertie Activity Summary May, 1998 Beginning Grant Chugach Ending Bank Funds Interest Invoices Bank Year Balance Received Earned Paid Balance 1996 0.00 2,771,277.00 40,361.59 (1,440,252.89) 1,371,385.70 1997 1,371,385.70 1,346,934.00 67,734.96 (2,421,276.94) 364,777.72 1998* 364,777.72 353,912.00 11,022.05 (308,454.33) 421,257.44 Total 4,472,123.00 119,118.60 (4,169,984.16) * Through May, 1998 bank statement (does not include Chugach invoices for charges incurred in April or May) ECEIVE D jun 12 1998 TRANSMISSION 8 e SPECIAL PROJEC Invoice Month Inception-to-Date Date Incurred Costs OH Total Charges Dec-95 Jun-Oct 95 22,614.00 113.07 22,727.07 22,727.07 Jan-96 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,727.07 Feb-96 Nov-Dec95 176,265.61 881.33 177,146.94 199,874.01 Mar-96 Jan-96 7,660.92 38.30 7,699.22 207,573.23 Apr-96 Feb-96 251,912.29 1,259.56 253,171.85 460,745.08 May-96 Mar-96 172,070.45 860.35 172,930.80 633,675.88 Jun-96 Apr-96 127,113.82 635.57 127,749.39 761,425.27 Jun-96 May-96 35,628.41 178.14 35,806.55 797,231.82 Aug-96 Jun-96 40,919.00 204.60 41,123.60 838,355.42 Sep-96 Jul-96 57,116.72 285.58 57,402.30 895,757.72 Oct-96 Aug-96 168,312.54 841.56 169,154.10 1,064,911.82 Oct-96 Sep-96 202,010.97 1,010.05 203,021.02 1,267,932.84 Dec-96 Oct-96 171,462.74 857.31 172,320.05 1,440,252.89 Life to Date 1,433,087.47 7,165.42 _1,440,252.89 Jan-97 Nov-96 234,735.50 1,173.68 235,909.18 1,676,162.07 Feb-97 Dec-96 306,667.10 1,533.34 308,200.44 1,984,362.51 Mar-97 Jan-97 5,045.85 25.23 5,071.08 1,989,433.59 Apr-97 Feb-97 124,380.57 621.90 125,002.47 2,114,436.06 May-97 Mar-97 177,117.40 885.59 178,002.99 2,292,439.05 Jun-97 Apr-97 165,814.35 829.07 166,643.42 2,459,082.47 Jul-97 May-97 158,762.80 793.81 159,556.61 2,618,639.08 Aug-97 Jun-97 158,786.12 793.93 159,580.05 2,778,219.13 Aug-97 Jul-97 154,159.15 770.80 154,929.95 2,933,149.08 Sep-97 Aug-97 243,365.76 1,216.83 244,582.59 3,177,731.67 Oct-97 Sep-97 193,127.79 965.64 194,093.43 3,371,825.10 Nov-97 Oct-97 258,833.19 1,294.17 260,127.36 3,631 ,952.46 Dec-97 Nov-97 228,435.19 1,142.18 229,577.37 3,861 ,529.83 Year to Date 2,409,230.77 12,046.17 2,421,276.94 Life to Date 3,842,318.24 19,211.59 3,861,529.83 Jan-98 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,861 ,529.83 Feb-98 Dec-97 153,179.64 765.90 153,945.54 4,015,475.37 Mar-98 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,015,475.37 Apr-98 Jan-98 39,750.15 198.75 39,948.90 4,055,424.27 Apr-98 Feb-98 49,887.09 249.44 50,136.53 4,105,560.80 May-98 Mar-98 64,102.85 320.51 64,423.36 4,169,984.16 Jun-98 0.00 . Jul-98 0.00 Aug-98 0.00 Sep-98 0.00 Oct-98 0.00 Nov-98 0.00 Dec-98 0.00 Year to Date 306,919.73 1,534.60 308,454.33 Life to Date 4,149,237.97 20,746.19 _4,169,984.16 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska 06/09/98 TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Jariya Summers, Plant Accountant SUBJECT: 9590081 - Souther Intertie Route Selection Study You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Southern Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occurred during April 1998. Direct Labor 2,612.46 Indirect Labor 1,091.96 Dora Gropp Invoice # 4/9-4/10 Expense 28.40 ERA Aviation Invoice #285316 92.00 Power Engineers Invoice # 50675 3,459.15 Sub-Total $7,283.97 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) 36.42 Total Charges $7,320.39 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As you requested, I'll keep the original in my files. Concur: Dover i Y Y GF Signatu Date WOfiles/E9590081 Attachments 6/9/98 Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary March, 1998 February Ending Balance forward $561,610.05 Total Deposits $0.00 Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for December 1997 charges) ($153,945.54) Interest Earned $2,289.68 Balance March 31, 1998 ~ $409,954.19 R ECEIVE Dp JUN 12 1998 TRANSMISSI OC) ST ME TECOTE Tm oreTty Oma erg BY Terre a CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 MAIN BRANCH PO BOX 100720 ANCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 DESCRIPTION BALANCE LAST STATEMENT INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST TRANSFER INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST BALANCE THIS STATEMENT x Rk TO BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 153,945.54 ee me ewer eee ere rece reer er eerr ere ceccce ee me em meee ere rere ree reerereseseecee CONTINUED * 245.66Y03/02/98 81.71V03/03/98 81.72V03/04/98 81.73V03/05/98 81.74V03/06/98 242.86V03/09/98 79.39V03/10/98 79.40V03/11/98 79.41V03/12/98 79.42V03/13/98 238.54/03/16/98 79.71V03/17/98 719.72V03/18/98 03/19/98 57.94V03/19/98 57.95V03/20/98 174.38V03/23/98 58.49V03/24/98 58.50/03/25/98 58.51V03/26/98 58.52V03/27/98 234.38 03/31/98 03/31/98 x * 000 01 00 PAGE: 1 DATE: © 131/98 ACCOUNT: 41100033 JUN 12 1998 TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT 30 0 0 TELEPHONE: 907-777-4362 CREDITS DATE BALANCE 02/27/98 561,610.05 561,855.71 561,937.42 562,019.14 562,100.87 562,182.61 562,425.47 562,504.86 562,584.26 562,663.67 562,743.09 562,981.63 563,061.34 563,141.06 409,195.52 409,253.46 409,311.41 409,485.79 409,544.28 409,602.78 409,661.29 409,719.81 409,954.19 409,954.19 000 01 00 PAGE: 2 ® DATE: © 431/98 ACCOUNT: 41100033 First National Bank COMMU ro AyTorum abe Ft E G E f V E D JUN 12 1998 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT TOTAL CREDITS (21) 2,289.68 TOTAL DEBITS (1) 153,945.54 TAX ID NUMBER 92-0014224 INTEREST THIS STATEMENT 2,289.68 INTEREST PAID 1998 6,943.51 - END OF STATEMENT - R ECEIVE BD) Southern Intertie Grant Fund Se JUN 12 1998 TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT March Ending Balance forward $409,954.19 Total Deposits $161,737.00 Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoices for January and February charges) ($90,085.43) Interest Earned $2,246.58 Balance April 30, 1998 $483,852.34 O) First National Bank awa tica AY enema Ce 000 O01 00 DATE: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 PAGE: ec *30/98 ACCOUNT: 1 41100033 2 ECEIVE D JUN 42 1998 TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT 30 oo MAIN BRANCH PO BOX 100720 ANCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 BALANCE LAST STATEMENT TRANSFER FROM BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST TRANSFER INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST TRANSFER INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST BALANCE THIS STATEMENT DESCRIPTION weer ee ere reer eer e rere cecce eee. 03/31/98 4/01/98 TO BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 39,948.90 TO BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 x x CONTINUED * 62. ee 82. if aoa piace Sy Sapa 244.76V04/06/98 04/07/98 75)-01V4/07/58 75.02V04/08/98 75.03¥04/09/98 75.04W04/10/98 226.29404/13/98 76.22164/14/98 76.23¥04/15/98 76.24404/16/98 76.25V04/17/98 228.01¥04/20/98 75.51W04/21/98 75.52V04/22/98 4/23/98 68.4 4/23/98 68.44Y04/24/98 204.75V¥04/27/98 67.88V04/28/98 67.89V04/29/98 67-90/04/30/98 04/30/98 x o* BALANCE 409,954.19 571,691.19 571,773.23 571,855.28 571,937.35 572,182.11 532,233.21 532,308.22 532,383.24 532,458.27 532,533.31 532,759.60 532,835.82 532,912.05 532,988.29 533,064.54 533,292.55 533,368.06 533,443.58 483,307.05 483,375.48 483,443.92 483,648.67 483,716.55 483,784.44 483,852.34 483,852.34 000 01 00 PAGE: 2 Oo) DATE: C ‘30/98 ACCOUNT: 41100033 DIONE m ris mae orice Ayo a OK CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I TOTAL CREDITS (23) 163,983.58 TOTAL DEBITS (2) 90,085.43 TAX ID NUMBER 92-0014224 INTEREST THIS STATEMENT 2,246.58 INTEREST PAID 1998 9,190.09 - END OF STATEMENT - » PAGE: 1 of a ACCOUNT: 1106061 DATE: 04/30/98 R ECE; SIRIMRE Oem stil s 000 01 00 VE ; meiner Member FDIC JUN 1 2 98 8 00008328 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I SOUTHERN INTERTIE GRANT FUND 30 PO BOX 196300 0 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 0 MAIN BRANCH TELEPHONE: 907-777-4362 PO BOX 100720 ANCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 92-0014224 LAST STATEMENT 03/31/98 -00 MINIMUM BALANCE -00 3 CREDITS 251,822.43 AVERAGE BALANCE -00 3 DEBITS 251,822.43 THIS STATEMENT 04/30/98 -00 ------- - OTHER CREDITS - ------- - DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT WIRE TRANSFER CREDIT 04/01 161,737.00 TRANSFER FROM REPURCHASE AGREEMENT ACCOUNT 41100033 04/07 39,948.90 TRANSFER FROM REPURCHASE AGREEMENT ACCOUNT 41100033 04/23 50,136.53 - --- - - - - - OTHER DEBITS - - ------- DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT TRANSFER TO REPURCHASE AGREEMENT ACCOUNT 41100033 04/01 161,737.00 CHUGACH ELECTRIC BOOK TRNFR 04/07 39,948.90 CHUGACH ELECTRIC BOOK TRNFR 04/23 50,136.53 - ------ - DAILY BALANCE ------- - DATE s s06 0,0 o.05.¢ BALANCE DATE << < « « sicwies - BALANCE DATElic< cams « oe BALANCE 04/01 -00 04/07 -00 04/23 -00 Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary May, 1998 April Ending Balance forward Total Deposits Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for March charges) Interest Earned Balance May 29, 1998 TRANSMISSION & SPECIA! 220JECT7 $483,852.34 $0.00 ($64,423.36) $1,828.46 $421,257.44 000 O01 oOo PAGE: 1 Oo) DATE: C ‘29/98 ACCOUNT: 41100033 VI MME COTE mrt i) we Wie ite Ao ete — ei JUN 12 1998 TRANSRISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I 30 PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK oo 99519-6300 MAIN BRANCH PO BOX 100720 ANCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 DESCRIPTION DEBITS CREDITS DATE BALANCE BALANCE LAST STATENENT 6 osiis cwicciwsivis cows vevwcssowsissacioss 04/30/98 483,852.34 INTEREST 67.91 05/01/98 483,920.25 INTEREST 204.41 05/04/98 484,124.66 INTEREST 68.60 05/05/98 484,193.26 INTEREST 68.61 05/06/98 484,261.87 INTEREST 68.62 05/07/98 484,330.49 INTEREST 68.63 05/08/98 484,399.12 TRANSFER TO BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 64,423.36 05/11/98 419,975.76 INTEREST 197.03 05/11/98 420,172.79 INTEREST 59.78 05/12/98 420,232.57 INTEREST 59.79 05/13/98 420,292.36 INTEREST 59.80 05/14/98 420,352.16 INTEREST 59.81 05/15/98 420,411.97 INTEREST 180.29 05/18/98 420,592.26 INTEREST 60.69 05/19/98 420,652.95 INTEREST 60.70 05/20/98 420,713.65 INTEREST 60.71 05/21/98 420,774.36 INTEREST 60.72 05/22/98 420,835.08 INTEREST 242.19 05/26/98 421,077.27 INTEREST 60.05 05/27/98 421,137.32 INTEREST 60.06 05/28/98 421,197.38 INTEREST 60.06 05/29/98 421,257.44 BALANCE THIS STATEMENT ....-- cee cece cece cece reer ec eececes 05/29/98 421,257.44 TOTAL CREDITS TOTAL DEBITS TAX ID NUMBER INTEREST THIS INTEREST PAID (20) (1) STATEMENT 1998 1,828.46 64,423.36 92-0014224 1,828.46 11,018.55 ** CONTINUED * * ooo O1 OO PAGE: 2 @® DATE: C ‘29/98 ACCOUNT: 41100033 POMEL S Cem sri 4 ew eetig Member FDIC e ECEIVE D JUN 12 1998 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I - END OF STATEMENT - SPECIAL PROJECT lil. SCHEDULE CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE Fri 6/19/98 PHASE IB 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID | Task Name % Comp. Act. Cost Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 |} Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4}Q1 1 | ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERI 58% | $4,380,608.02 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 36% $144,009.90 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUDIE 100% $871,650.00 4 EIS & PREL.ENGINEERING 98% | $3,245,833.12 5 SCOPING 100% $375,997.34 6 INVENTORY 100% $680,396.25 7 IMPACT/MITIGATION 100% $607,560.00 8 ALTERN.SELECTION 100% $335,392.00 9 EVAL (DRAFT EIS) 97% $729,517.60 10 ANILCA (FINAL EIS) 43% $22,989.19 11 STUDIES 100% $101,476.81 12 ENG.FIELD WORK 100% $202,645.44 13 PREL. ENGINEERING 100% $189,858.49 14 AGENCIES 39% $119,115.00 15 USFS 20% $34,954.00 16 USFWS 50% $24,600.00 17 RUS 95% $59,561.00 Task ESE Summary aay Rolled Up Progress TS Project: ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTE . Date: Fri 6/19/98 Progress Rolled Up Task «= Milestone & Rolled Up Milestone © PH_IB.MPP. Page 1 IV. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL None. V. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. Vi. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION a5 USFWS letter of May 1,1998 with a revised cost estimate for overall costs 2. Power Engineers letter of May 26,1998 with a cost estimate for the EIS support 3. Letter from USDA/RUS with a cost estimate for the preparation of the EIS June 12, 1998 4. POWER Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, June 17, 1998 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1011 E. Tudor Rd. Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6199 IN REPLY REFER TO: RE/2241.BA MAY - | 1998 Ms. Dora L. Gropp, P.E. Fe ECEIVE D Manager, Transmission and Special Projects Chugach Electric Association, Inc. MAY U 4 4998 P.O. Box 196300 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 TRANSMISSION i. SPECIAL PROJECT Dear Ms. Gropp: This responds to your April 7, 1998, letter requesting a revised estimate of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service costs associated with your pending right-of-way permit application for the proposed Southern Intertie Transmission Line. As you know, regulations at 43 CFR 36.6 (c) require that applicants for transportation and utility systems rights-of-way under Title XI of ANILCA reimburse the Service for the administrative and other costs of application processing, and for environmental impact statement preparation. The enclosed estimate amends the previous estimate provided with our June 1997 collection agreement, and includes anticipated application review costs by our engineering, biological, archaeological, economics, refuge management, and realty personnel. The estimate is based on the assumption that you will be responsible for contracting the required appraisal. If you prefer that we conduct the appraisal, we will provide an estimate for that cost. You will find that this estimate exceeds the amount of our original estimate, due largely to the size and complexity of the proposed project, and the subsequent addition of the environmental analysis (EVAL) process. Thank you for your cooperation. Please remit the remaining balance as per the June 1997 collection agreement, and contact Mr. Brian Anderson at 786-3379 if you have questions require additional information. Sincerely, 5 A Shor a NAGY Sharon Janis Chief, Division of Realty Enclosure Financial Plan Southern Intertie Environmental Analysis/ Right-of-way Permit Processing U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 7 - Alaska Revised April 29, 1998 Item/Activi C 1. Cooperative agreement preparation/teview Wildlife Biologist (16 hrs.) $ 609.00 2. Inter-agency coordination meetings (10 meetings) Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (40 hrs.) , $1,525.00 Fish and Wildlife Biologist (Refuge) (20 hrs.) 702.00 Refuge Manager (8 hrs.) 355.00 3. Scoping Report review Wildlife Biologist (16 hrs.) $ 609.00 4. Travel Related Costs Alaska coordination meetings Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (4 trips) Travel and Per diem $ 328.00 Fish and Wildlife Biologist (Refuge) (4 trips) Travel and Per diem $ 958.00 Public hearing - Washington, D.C. Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (32 hrs.) 1,220.00 Travel and Per diem 1,300.00 Refuge Manger (32 hrs.) 1,420.00 Travel and Per diem 1,300.00 I - 5. EVAL review/technical assistance Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (200 hrs.) Fish and Wildlife Biologists (Refuge) (149 hrs.) Ecologist (8 hrs.) Fire management specialist (8 hrs.) Forester (12 hrs.) Park Ranger (40 hrs.) 6. NEPA document preparation/review: Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (40 hrs.) Fish and Wildlife Biologists (Refuge) (98 hrs.) Fire management specialist (6 hrs.) Forester (6 hrs.) Park Ranger (24 hrs.) 7. ROW application processing: ROW application fee Compatibility determination Fish and Wildlife Biologists (Refuge) (64 hrs.) Refuge Manager (16 hrs.) Subsistence evaluation Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (16 hrs.) Cultural resources evaluation Archaeologist (64 hrs.) Economics review Economist (16 hrs.) Engineering review Civil Engineer (64 hrs.) Appraisal review Review Appraiser (8 hrs.) Permit preparation Realty Specialist (80 hrs.) Record of Decision Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (16 hrs.) Automation, reproduction, etc. Total Less deposit Balance Due $7,600.00 5,130.00 240.00 194.00 340.00 1,350.00 $1,525.00 3,284.00 146.00 170.00 816.00 $1,000.00 2,357.00 710.00 610.00 2,816.00 940.00 2,972.00 338.00 2,242.00 610.00 — 200.00 $45,916.00 S$ 6,$00;00 $39,116.00 9) TOWER May 26, 1998 R ECEIVE Dora L. Gropp, PE. JUN 04 1998 Manager, Transmission & Special Projects TRANSMISSION & Chugach Electric Association, Inc. SPECIAL PROJECT 5601 Minnesota Drive, Bldg. A Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: 120376-05 Southern Intertie, Phase IB - Chugach Contract #95-208 Power Project 120376 - Work Scope and Budget for EIS Support Dear Ms. Gropp, In response to your request, the purpose of this letter is to provide an estimated budget for the Power Engineers team for the DEIS/EIS phase of the Project. We have prepared a description of a proposed scope of work and budget for the DEIS/EIS support portion of the Project, which will occur subsequent to completion of the Final EVAL and ANILCA application. The proposed scope of work is described in detail in the attached memorandum from Dames & Moore. A summary of the associated budget is also attached. The proposed scope of work and budget is based on the Applicants responsibilities as outlined in the MOU. While we have prepared this estimated scope of work and budget based on our experience with similar projects, and considering the MOU for this Project, it must be remembered that the actual work required during this period will to a large degree depend on agency requirements and public comments. As we have experienced, agency requirements have been difficult to predict. Accordingly, the scope of work and budget may require revision as we complete the DEIS/EIS phase of the Project. We expect to work closely with you during this period to assist in the coordination and management of the process. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. After you have had opportunity to review these materials, I will call you to see if further clarification or discussion is needed. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. [LPL Randy Pollock, P.E. Sr. Project Manager RP/ukk Enclosures cc: Mike Walbert (PEI) Tim Tetherow (D&M) File: 120376-05-55-00-30 DEN 26-374 (5/26/98) ukk POWER Engineers, Incorporated in a A A SS 3900 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 700 Phone (303) 716-8900 Lakewood, CO 80235 Fax (303) 716-8980 Southern Intertie Project Proposed Budget for DEIS/EIS Support Work Item] Work Item Description Power Engineers Dames and Moore Totals Labor |Expenses| Subtotal |} Labor | Expenses} L&E 2% Subtotal Technical/Envi 1 Eppa Environmental ¢32.413| $5,400| $37,813] $65,890 $16,675| $82,565] $1,651] $84,217|| $122,030 2 Public Involvement $1,667 $100} _ $1,767] $39,070} $13,990} $53,060] $1,061] $54,121]/ $55,888 Respond to DEIS 3 Comments $19,095) $9,125} $28,220]/ $67,303} $9,070] $76,373} $1,527] $77,901}} $106,121 4 |FEIS Support $3,334 $200] $3,534) $24,342) $1,550} $25,892 $518] $26,410)| $29,944 5 Mailing List $0 $0 $0}} $16,188} $2,000] $18,188 $364} $18,552)) $18,552 6 Print & Distribute DEIS/EIS| $0 $0 $0} $13,886) $69,100] $82,986 $1,660) $84,646) $84,646 7 Public Hearings | $16,114] $5,125] $21,239] $33,955] $9,075] $43,030 $861} $43,890]| $65,129 8 Schedule Administration $4,855 $300} $5,155) $27,175} $3,295} $30,470 $609} _$31,080}) $36,235 9 Project Management $76,413} $14,840] $91,253 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0} $91,253 Total Budget $153,891] $35,090} $188,981] $287,810] $124,755] $412,565 $8,251} $420,816]| $609,797 Notes: 1. This budget is for the 16 month period from August 1, 1998 to December 1, 1999, coincident with the projected 16 month ANILCA period. 2. The Project Management budget includes 6 trips for quarterly Project review and coordination meetings. 3. Any trips for Power Engineers required under Work Item 2 - Public Involvement would be combined with one of the 6 Project Management review and coordination trips. 3. See Work Item descriptions for an explanation of the work proposed for each item. 4. The overall scope of work required to be completed by Power Engineers and Dames & Moore cannot be precisely known at this time. This proposed budget is based on the Applicant (IPG) responsibilities as outlined in the MOU, and the scope of work required from Power Engineers and Dames & Moore will depend on the demands of the agencies and IPG throughout the DEIS/EIS process. Accordingly, this proposed budget is only an estimate. More or less effort, and consequently adjustments to this budget and the associated scope of work may be appropriate as a result of changes in the Project schedule or work scope. DEN 26-366 (5/26/98) DEIS/EIS Support MEMORANDUM TO: Randy Pollock, Power Engineers FROM: Tim Tetherow, Dames & Moore DATE: May 26, 1998 SUBJECT: Southern Intertie Project — Budget for EIS Support This memo is in response to the request to prepare a budget to support the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southern Intertie Project (Project) by the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). BUDGET FOR EIS SUPPORT The scope of work for EIS support is defined by the MOU under Item III — 4 - Applicant Responsibilities. The following work items are required by the Applicant to complete the EIS: 1. Provide engineering, construction, financial analysis, technical and environmental information to the Lead Agency and Cooperating Agencies for the preparation of the EIS Conduct supplemental public involvement activities Assist in preparing responses to the DEIS comments and incorporation in the FEIS Maintain project mailing list Print and assist in distribution of the EIS Schedule public hearings Manage the schedule aS =o) = Total costs to support the IPG’s responsibilities are based on the above task requirements. Work Item 1 — Provide Technical and Environmental Support The goal of the EVAL process has been to incorporate all required or requested data from the agencies and their representatives into a document that will serve as the basis for the EIS. The purpose of this work item is to provide available resources on an as-needed basis to respond to further data requests, or studies that may surface from the agencies during the EIS preparation process, the ANILCA review, or as a result of comments on the Draft EIS. Another source of possible comments could come from the private sectors on the Kenai Peninsula or in Anchorage. We are anticipating that the most likely areas of Prepared by Tim Tetherow — Dames & Moore Southern Intertie Project Budget Memorandum to Randy Pollock — Power Engineers Budget for EIS Support May 26, 1998 support will be technical input from POWER Engineers on purpose and need, project description, and mitigation. Environmental support is anticipated to most likely be in the areas of land use, biology, graphics and mapping. The level of effort is balanced between environmental management and coordination, technical, environmental resource, graphic and mapping, and clerical support. We would analyze and confirm the need and scope of technical or environmental data requests prior to implementation. Work Item 2 — Public Involvement Public involvement support is planned to respond to such requirements as additional newsletters, open houses or small group meetings that maybe appropriate during the EIS process. Examples of supplemental public involvement could include meetings associated with South Anchorage alternative routes associated with the proposed Enstar Alternative or by the Kenai Borough for the North Kenai or Soldotna areas. Work Item 3 — Respond to Comments to the DEIS The major task for POWER Engineers and Dames & Moore is expected to be in assisting the agencies and Mangi with analyses of comments to the DEIS and preparing comments. We anticipate that a series of meetings will occur to review comments, establish a plan for responses, and review prepared responses. Some comments could trigger the need for additional studies as indicated in Work Item — 1. Work Item 4 — Incorporation of Responses into the FEIS The extent of our involvement in the preparation to the FEIS is expected to be in the formatting of comments and prepared responses. This task requires a layout of the formal written comments and corresponding responses in a format that can be readily incorporated into the FEIS. Work Item 5 — Prepare and Maintain Mailing List Dames & Moore will establish a mailing list to be used throughout the preparation of the EIS. The list will be developed initially using the address database we maintained during the preparation of the EVAL and will be supplemented as additional named and addresses are provided as a result of the public notification process. The list will include names and addresses of federal, tribal, state, county, and local agencies; relevant businesses; organizations and special-interest groups; and interested individuals. We will use Microsoft Access Database (Access) for filing and storing the list. Access provides an easy data entry format, various report options, and record-management tools. Access is compatible with Excel to create spreadsheets and with Microsoft Word to create merge Prepared by Tim Tetherow — Dames & Moore 2 Southern Intertie Project Budget Memorandum to Randy Pollock — Power Engineers Budget for EIS Support May 26, 1998 letters and mailing labels. Using Access we are able to segregate newsletter, meeting announcement, and EIS mailing files, if needed. Work Item 6 — Print and Distribute the EIS An estimate for printing 250 copies of the EVAL, Draft EIS has been prepared on an estimate from a printer for $200 per copy. We also have estimated the costs for 250 copies of the Final EIS based on an assumption of $12 per copy. A 20% factor was added to the estimate for budgeting purposes, for a total of $65,000 for 250 copies of the EVAL, Draft EIS, and Final EIS. Our proposal of 250 copies exceeds our initial proposal of 200 copies (April 1996) in order to provide 50 copies for Chugach Electric distribution, leaving 200 copies for public and agency distribution. If more than 200 copies are required for public distribution, the unit costs per copy would apply. Costs for this Work Item includes the mailing of the Draft and Final EIS’s. Work Item 7 — Public Hearings ANILCA regulations require public hearings in Washington D.C. and Alaska. Estimated costs include planning locations, announcements, meeting rooms and refreshments, court recorder and transcripts, and attendance at each hearing. We assume that in Alaska that hearings could be held in Anchorage, Kenai, and Soldotna. Work Item 8 — Schedule Tracking the schedule will be an ongoing task, which will include maintaining communication on the status of the EIS production, agency interaction, internal planning meetings, and schedule updates. Summary The estimated costs assume that the EIS will be prepared over a 16-month time. The level of effort for environmental management assumes an average of a week per month over the project duration on an as-need basis. Prepared by Tim Tetherow — Dames & Moore 3 USDA United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Business—Cooperative Service * Rural Housing Service » Rural Utilities Service Washington, DC 20250 JUN 1 2 1998 Ms. Dora L. Gropp R ECEIVE ri Manager, Transmission & Special Projects Chugach Electric Association, Inc. JUN 18 1998 P.O. Box 196300 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT Dear Ms. Gropp: Enclosed for your review is draft Statement of Work No. 2 and its associated cost estimate for the Southern Intertie Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This Statement of Work covers the preparation of the Draft EIS and participation in ANILCA hearings in Anchorage and Washington, DC by the Mangi Environmental Group, Inc. The total estimated cost ($97,440) includes the Corps of Engineers contract and administrative costs so it is approximately 3% higher than my earlier estimate. Resolution of comments on the Draft EIS and preparation of the Final EIS and Record of Decision would be covered in Statement of Work No. 3. A detailed cost estimate is not available, however, I expect that total cost of this phase to be around $37,000. If you have any questions, please contact Larry Wolfe at (202) 720-5093. Sincerely, A <1. ‘ARY J. MORGAN Director Engineering and Environmental Staff Rural Utilities Service Rural Development is an Equal Opportunity Lender Complaints of discrimination should be sent to: ‘Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250 DRAFT June 12, 1998 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MANGI ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. STATEMENT OF WORK NO. 2 1.0 BACKGROUND Seven electric utilities, collectively known as the Intertie Participants Group (IPG), are proposing to construct an electric transmission line from a location on the Kenai Peninsula to a location in or near Anchorage within the State of Alaska called the Southern Intertie Project. Several alternative locations for each terminal are being considered, as well as two distinctly different alternative routes ranging in length from approximately 60 miles to 90 miles. Two IPG utilities, the Golden Valley Electric Association, and the Homer Electric Association, are Rural Utilities Service (RUS) borrowers. These two borrowers may apply to RUS for financing assistance for their combined 28 percent share of the proposed project. RUS is considering providing such funding, and is serving as the Lead Agency for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed action, as announced in the Federal Register on October 9, 1996. The IPG, and their consultant team, conducted macro corridor and alternative evaluation studies to identify feasible and suitable project alternatives. Additional studies verified and quantified the resources that occur within the study area and then predicted the impact that project alternatives involving transmission line construction would have on these resources. These studies are reported in an Environmental Analysis (EVAL) that has been submitted by the IPG to RUS. The EVAL will provide the basis for the preparation of the EIS in accordance with 7 CFR Section 1794.53 of RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The overall objective is to prepare an EIS for this project that is consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations (40 CFR Part 1500) and RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures (7 CFR Part 1794). The objective of this task is for the contractor to prepare a Draft EIS for RUS, as outlined in Section 3.0, and to assist RUS in public hearings conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. DRAFT June 12, 1998 3.0 SCOPE The final scope of the Draft EIS will be based upon the significant issues identified during the scoping process. The content of the Draft EIS will be derived from information contained in the EVAL and other appropriate information. The RUS contractor shall work closely with the Contracting Officer’s Representative and Administrative Staff to ensure the intent of NEPA is fulfilled. 40 REQUIREMENTS 4.1 GENERAL To accomplish the objective of this task, the contractor shall: e Using information contained in the EVAL and from any other appropriate sources, as necessary, prepare a Draft EIS that is consistent with NEPA and 40 CFR Part 1500; e Provide RUS with quality assurance and verification of the document’s contents, analyses and conclusions; e Provide a similar quality assurance concerning the adequacy of the overall NEPA process, including public involvement. The RUS contractor shall ensure that sufficient documentation and analyses are performed to satisfy NEPA and the requirements of the statutes and regulations listed in 7 CFR Part 1794. The RUS contractor shall provide the necessary personnel, services, materials, equipment, and facilities to carry out the specific task requirements as set forth below. Upon completion of this delivery order, the RUS contractor shall surrender to RUS complete copies of all electronic files developed for any component of the Draft EIS and any item purchased by the contractor for this project and paid for through this contract. 4.2, SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 4.2.1 PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS shall be prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulations and Subpart F of RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures. In preparing the analysis, the RUS contractor will follow any standards and use any analytical methodologies approved by the RUS. The format of the Draft EIS is outlined in Section 4.2.1.1. DRAFT June 12, 1998 The RUS contractor shall submit to RUS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), a Draft EIS outline, including section and subsection titles, and a preliminary table of contents. The Government shall provide review comment to the contractor. The contractor shall incorporate the comments and submit one copy of the final outline to the RUS and the cooperating agencies. The RUS contractor shall prepare and submit for RUS and FWS review, the Draft EIS chapters on a schedule outlined in Section 7.0. Chapter 2 shall be prepared in two parts. Part 1 shall include a description of the alternatives considered and the alternatives evaluated. Part 2 shall include the comparison of the environmental impacts of the alternatives evaluated in detail as well as their cost/benefit and engineering feasibility comparisons. Other parts of the Draft EIS that shall be prepared by the RUS contractor include a cover sheet, executive summary, list of acronyms and abbreviations, references cited and an index. RUS and FWS review of the initial draft chapters will be completed and comments provided to the RUS contractor within 10 working days of receipt of the last deliverable. Comments on individual chapters will be submitted to the RUS contractor as soon as they are available. Following the incorporation of RUS and FWS comments on the initial draft chapters and within 10 working day of receiving RUS and FWS comments on the complete set of initial Draft EIS deliverables, the contractor shall prepare and upon RUS approval submit the preliminary Draft EIS to RUS, the FWS, and IPG for review and comment. The preliminary Draft EIS shall resemble, as closely as possible in both quality and content, the Draft EIS. The preliminary Draft EIS shall not be used to obtain initial comments and concerns of other regulatory agencies directly interested in the proposal, rather, their comments and concerns will be incorporated in the Final EIS along with the Government's defense, response, or resolution of public comments on the Draft EIS RUS, FWS, and IPG review of the preliminary Draft EIS will be completed and comments provided to the RUS contractor within 20 working days of receipt of the document. The RUS contractor will assist RUS in consolidating and resolving comments on the preliminary Draft EIS. The RUS contractor shall incorporate changes into a final version’ of the Draft EIS that shall be submitted to RUS to be published for public review and comment. The final version of the Draft EIS will be provided in a format suitable for printing (Microsoft Word, Version 6.0 minimum file) and in an electronic format (Acrobat in “portable document format”) for inclusion on the Internet (RUS home page). DRAFT June 12, 1998 4.2.1.1 DRAFT EIS FORMAT The format of the Draft EIS shall consist of: Cover Sheet: (CEQ Regulations, Section 1502.11). Executive Summary: (CEQ Regulations, Section 1502.12). Table of Contents. List of acronyms and abbreviations. Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need for Action: (CEQ, Section 1502.13) Chapter 2 - Alternatives Including the Proposed Action: (CEQ, Section 502.14). Chapter 3 - Affected Environment: (CEQ, Section 1502.15). Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences: (CEQ Section 1502.16). Chapter 5 - List of Preparers: (CEQ Section 1502.17). Chapter 6 - List of Agencies, Organizations, and Persons to whom copies of the Draft EIS were sent. References cited. Index. Appendices (final EVAL). 4.2.1.2 TEXT AND GRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT Using the EVAL where possible, the RUS contractor shall edit the submitted information preparing revisions where necessary, to ensure that the text is technically sound and is written in a clear concise fashion. To the extent necessary, the RUS contractor shall coordinate with the IPG consultants the development of additional graphic diagrams, charts, illustrations, photos, photosimulations, supplemental sidebars and other graphic devices to enhance the readability and usefulness of the Draft EIS. 4.2.2 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT The IPG will file an application for a right-of-way through the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge with the FWS. Such application requires the FWS and RUS to conduce public hearings in Anchorage, Alaska, and Washington, D.C. as mandated by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). These public hearings will be scheduled during the 60-day comment period on the Draft EIS. A representative of the contractor shall attend these public hearings and shall be prepared to explain their role in the development of the EIS for this project. 4.2.3 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Public notification will be the responsibility of the Government. DRAFT June 12, 1998 5.0 MEETINGS 5.1 PROGRESS MEETINGS The RUS contractor shall attend progress meetings to present interim findings and the deliverables identified in Section 7.0. The progress meetings shall be scheduled to correspond to deliverable due dates. It is anticipated that the IPG and consultants will attend the formal meeting listed below whereas the FWS will participate in this meeting by teleconference. The RUS contractor shall transmit weekly status reports to RUS by e- mail. The RUS contractor shall maintain frequent and informal communication by telephone, fax, e-mail, letter, and/or meetings with RUS. A meeting of approximately 2-3 days will be scheduled in Washington, DC to discuss agency and IPG comments on the preliminary Draft EIS. The RUS contractor shall assist RUS in consolidating and resolving comments on the preliminary Draft EIS. 5.2. PUBLIC HEARINGS A representative of the RUS contractor shall attend the public hearings mandated by ANILCA that will be held in Anchorage and Washington, DC during the comment period on the Draft EIS. It is anticipated that one public hearing, scheduled after normal working hours, would be held at each location. The contractor shall be prepared to explain their role in the development of EIS for the project. 6.0 DOCUMENT PREPARATION & DISTRIBUTION Reproduction and distribution for all components of the Draft EIS shall be the responsibility of RUS. The RUS contractor shall submit camera-ready versions of all graphics or tables prepared as part of the Draft EIS by themselves and where the contractor has modified graphics or tables originally prepared by the IPG. DRAFT June 12, 1998 7.0 SCHEDULE Draft EIS Outline & Table of Contents Initial drafts of Draft EIS chapters. Chapter 2, Part 1 15 Chapter 3 30 Chapter 4 45 Chapter 2, Part 2 60 Summary 65 Other Sections | 70 Preliminary Draft EIS 80 ANILCA Hearings When scheduled Briefings, Status Updates * After award of the delivery order ae After receipt of the final EVAL *** After receipt of agency comments on Draft EIS Southern Intertie Project Confidential Page 1 USDA, RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE - CONTRACT NO. DACW69-97-D-0013 DELIVERY ORDER NO.2, MODIFICATION NO.O SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MANGI ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC., SCHEDULE A - LABOR HOURS LABOR CATEGORY ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST VI ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST V ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST IV ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST III PHYSICAL SCIENTIST TECHNICIAN SECRETARY TOTAL HOURS SCHEDULE B - LABOR CATEGORY ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST VI ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST V ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST IV ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST III PHYSICAL SCIENTIST TECHNICIAN SECRETARY SUBTOTAL PREPARE DRAFT EIS OUTLINE 16 6 6 6 42 TOTAL HOURS 872 194 194 194 300 98 PREPARE PRELIMNARY DRAFT EIS 520 120 120 120 160 48 1088 LABOR RATES $50.47 $50.47 $50.47 $50.47 $50.47 $36.10 $25.63 PREPARE REVISED DRAFT EIS 112 48 48 48 64 6 326 ATTEND ANILCA HEARINGS 104 20 20 20 72 12 248 BRIEFINGS & MEETINGS 40 16 MGMT & ADMIN 80 12 92 TOTAL 872 194 194 194 300 98 1852 TOTAL COSTS $44,010 $9,791 $9,791 $9,791 $0 $10,830 $2,512 $86,725 Southern Intertie Project SCHEDULE C - TRAVEL AND PER DIEM ASSUMPTION: PER DIEM ($179/day) - 6 days total AIRFARE RENTAL CAR/ GAS ($50/DAY+GAS) MISC TRAVEL EXPENSES SUBTOTALS SCHEDULE D - OTHER DIRECT COSTS PHONE/FAX COPYING/REPRODUCTION POSTAGE/SHIPPING SUPPLIES/PUBLICATIONS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS TOTALS TOTAL DIRECT LABOR (SCHEDULE B) TOTAL TRAVEL AND PER DIEM (SCHEDULE C) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (SCHEDULE D) SUBTOTAL TRAVEL/PREDIEM AND ODCs G&A ON TRAVEL/PERDIEM AND ODCs (13.75%) USACE CONTRACT & ADMIN COSTS (3%) TOTAL 1074 1000 300 2374 1054 1082 787 4551 Confidential Page 2 TOTALS $1,074 $1,000 $300 $2,374 1054 1082 787 $4,551 $86,725 $2,374 $4,551 $6,925 $952 $2,838 $97,440 9) COMER June 17, 1998 FE EecrIve Tr) JUN © 2 1S9R Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association TRercr 5601 Minnesota Drive, Building A SPEGIAL frie! Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: POWER Project #120376 EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract #95-208 Monthly Status Report No. 23 For Period May 10 - June 13, 1998 Dear Dora: The following activities were performed during this invoicing period on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Preliminary Engineering portion of the Southern Intertie Project. Key Issues: e¢ Completion of the Final EVAL. e Preparation of the ANILCA application. Invoice Period Overview: Revisions to EVAL based on agency comments. Revisions to maps and graphics. Agency consultation on EVAL requirements and distribution. Preparation of the ANILCA application Work Planned for the Next Invoice Period: e Receive comments and prepare final EVAL. e¢ Conduct agency review meeting the week of June 22 ¢ Continue preparation of the ANILCA application. HLY 23-215 POWER Engineers, Incorporated A 3940 Glenbrook Dr. ¢ P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey, Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association June 17, 1998 Page 2 Schedule: The current milestone schedule through completion of the EVAL and ANILCA application 1S: Draft EVAL completed and distributed - November 18, 1997 (completed). Review of Draft EVAL by Agencies - November through February (completed). IPG Alternative Decision — February 25, 1998 (completed). An ANILCA application will be filed for the Enstar route. Initial Comments on Draft EVAL back from all agencies by the first part of March 1998. (completed) Completion of revisions to the Draft EVAL in response to comments — 2" Draft EVAL sent outs to agencies on May 11 and May 13 (Chapter 4). Receive agency comments on revisions to the 2" Draft EVAL — Week of June 15, 1998. Joint Agency Meeting to Finalize the EVAL revisions in response to agency comments — June 23 and 24, 1998. Final EVAL - anticipated July 1998. ANILCA application for the Enstar route to follow completion of the Final EVAL. As we review comments back from the agencies and have an opportunity to analyze them, we will be able to determine if there will be further impacts to the schedule. At that time we will estimate the completion schedule through the Record of Decision (ROD). These issues will be discussed at the joint agency meetings on June 23 and 24. Monthly Status Report Issues: Please refer to the Activities Summary attached for work completed and planned for each Task. Project Overview: Total Budget $3,295,860 Actual $ Expended (to date) $3,244,121 Actual Remaining Project Budget $ 51,739 HLY 23-215 ) ous cornmewes Chugach Electric Association June 17, 1998 Page 3 Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Walbert or me. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. ak ppt sand, Pollock, P.E. Project Manager RP/Ik Enclosures cc: PROJECT TEAM HLY 23-215 ) yous SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 120376 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY JUNE, 1998 INVOICE | Project Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 | Task 8 Task 9 Total Base Not to Exceed $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 Budget _| L CWG Contract $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 $32,866 $4,904 N/A N/A N/A N/A $103,046 Amendment No. 4 DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $45,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A $45,000 Amendment No. 5 | DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $11,400 N/A N/A N/A N/A $11,400 Amendment No.6 | | DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $3,502 N/A N/A N/A N/A $3,502 Amendment No. 7 | i| DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $89,487 N/A N/A N/A N/A $89,487 Amendment No. 8 Task 5 & 6 N/A N/A ZN N/A $194,150 | ($194,150) N/A N/A N/A $0 Reallocation * Total Not to Exceed $374,839 $679,591 $606,612 $336,341 $751,015 $53,466 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,295,860 Budget Actual Budget $374,839 $679,583 $606,540 $336,315 $698,216 $0 $101,476 $202,610 $189,852 $3,189,431 Expended Through Previous Invoice | Current Invoice $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,676 $23,014 $0 $0 $0 $54,690 Amount Actual Budget $374,839 $679,583 $606,540 $336,315 $729,892 $23,014 $101,476 $202,610 $189,852 $3,244,121 Expended Through Current Invoice | Remaining $0 $8 $72 $26 $21,123 $30,452 $4 $45 $9 $51,739 Budget * Task 5 and 6 budget amounts reallocated per April 24, 1998 letter from Robert Martin to Randy Pollock. HLY 23-215 JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 1 - SCOPING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Scoping e no action. KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($351,050 + $23,789 = $374,839). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 374,839 374,839 0 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 2 - INVENTORY DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Inventory e no action. KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($660,706 + $18,885 = $679,591). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 679,591 679,583 8 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 3 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Impact Assessment/ |e no action. Mitigation Planning KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($584,010 + $22,602 = $606,612). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 606,612 606,540 72 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 4 - ALTERNATIVE SELECTION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Alternative Selection e no action. KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($303,475 + $32,866 = $336,341). l $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 336,341 336,315 26 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 5 - EVAL PREPARATION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS EVAL Preparation revisions to EVAL based on agency comments. revisions to maps and graphics. receive comments and prepare final EVAL. KEY ISSUES: Production and distribution of the Final EVAL SCHEDULE: Schedule for completing of this Task is projected for July. BUDGET: Contract amendments Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and the budget reallocation! for Tasks 5 and 6 are included in the budget ($402,570 + $4,904 + $45,000 + $11,400 + $3,502 + $89,487 + $194,150 = $751,015). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining $751,015 729,892 21,123 SCOPE: Two letters” outlining changes in scope resulting from the addition of fiber optics to the EVAL, visual simulations, and additional work on the purpose and need section of the document have been submitted for consideration. ' Tasks 5 and 6 budget amounts reallocated per April 24, 1998 letter from Robert Martin to Randy Pollock. ? April 10, 1998 and May 26, 1998 letters from Randy Pollock to Dora Gropp. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 6 - ANILCA APPLICATION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS ANILCA Application e agency consultation on EVAL requirements and distribution. ¢ preparation of the ANILCA application. preparation of the draft ANILCA application. KEY ISSUES: Completion of revisions to the Draft EVAL in response to comments. Completion of the ANILCA application. SCHEDULE: Schedule for completion of this Task is projected for July. BUDGET: The budget reallocation’ for Tasks 5 and 6 is included in the budget ($247,616 - $194,150 = $53,466). The costs for Dames & Moore to attend the ANILCA pre- application meeting were charged to Task 5 in error. An adjustment will be made on next months invoice and monthly report. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 53,466 23,014 30,452 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. > Tasks 5 and 6 budget amounts reallocated per April 24, 1998 letter from Robert Martin to Randy Pollock. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 7 - STUDIES DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Studies e no action. KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 101,480 101,476 4 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 8 - ENGINEERING FIELD WORK DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Engineering Field Work |e no action. KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 202,655 202,610 45 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a JUNE 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 9 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Preliminary Engineering |e no action. KEY ISSUES: Task is complete. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 189,861 189,852 9 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-215a 6/16/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 06-13-98 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 is in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 are in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 is in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 [ 4ST QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JuNWUL [AUG | SEP oct | Nov | DE APR MAY 1 SCOPING | Actual % Work Completed 5% | 20% 28% 33% 51% 72% 77%| 93% 99% 99% 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 2%! 25% 26% 33%| 52% 74% 87% | 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A| __NA NAAT _N/A| N/A N/A 77%| 93% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100%! 100%| 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5%| 30%|_ 30% er Se es eS “93% 99% 99%: 99% 97%| «98% | 98% 99% Base Planned $ (this period) $6,743 | ___ $81,045 $2,745 $25,645 | $67,045 $75,045 $46,045 $23,645 $23,092 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) | N/A| N/A| N/A N/A| N/A N/A] $67,538: $60,112 $27,222 $0 | UMS ANAL S50 $0 | $01 (NETS) Actual $ Expended (this period) $15,925 | $89,330 ($558) $9,848 | $63,340 $42,082 $67,538 $59,509 $25,800 $0) ($593) ($7,434) $1,037 | $580 $3,607 Base Planned $ (to date) $6,743 | __ $87,788 $90,533 | $116,178 | $183,223 | $258,268 | $304,313 | $327,958 | $351,050| $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050| $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A] $287,505 $347,617| $374,839 | $374,839 $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) $15,925 | $105,255 | $104,697 | $114,545 | $177,885 | _$219,967| $287,505 $347,014 | _$372,814| $372,814 | $372,221| $364,787 | $365,824 $366,404 | $370,011 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050| $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050, $351,050| $351,050] $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 | _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | N/A| N/A __NAI N/A N/A __NA| $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 | $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050] $374,839| $374,839] $374,839] $374,839| $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $335,125 | $245,795 | $246,353 | $236,505 $173,165 | $131,083 $87,334 $27,825 $2,025 $2,025 | $2,618 $10,052 $8,435 $4,828 INVENTORY | | | Actual % Work Completed 0%! 6% 25% 45%| 60% 67% 73%| 80% 87% 88%) 88% 90% 90%) 92% 95% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0%| 5% 23% 53%) 73% 83% 84% 84% 84% 84% 84% 87% 95% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A| N/A _ N/A N/A| N/A N/A 73%| 82% 85% 86% | 86% 89% 92%| 96% 100% [ae % Expended $ (to date) 0%| 5% 24% 43% «58% 729% MMMM 733% 78% 87% 88% 88% 90%| 90% «92% 95% Base Planned $ (this period) $941 | $29,441 $121,000 $200,500 $129,500 $69,768 | $5,000 | $0 $0 $0 | $1,000 $16,500 $52,000 | $34,056 $1,000 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| __NA N/A N/A| N/A N/A| $19,728 | $58,932 $20,240 $8,817 | $3,000 $17,500 | $19,000/ $29,613 | $26,975 Actual $ Expended (this period) i $0 $32,162 | $124,454 | $129,043 $100,796 | _—$89,331| $19,728 | $33,908 $63,502| $2,888) S80 $15,815 $1,302 | $10,970 $20,973 Base Planned $ (to date) $041 | $30,382 | $151,382 | $351,882 | _$481,382| _$551,150| $556,150 $556,150 | $556,150 | $556,150 $557,150 | $573,650} $625,650 $659,706 | $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A NA; «NA N/A| N/A N/A| $495,514 | $554,446 | $574,686 | $583,503 | $586,503 | $604,003| $623,003 | $652,616 | $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $32,162 | $156,616 | $285,659 $386,455| $475,786 | $495,514 $529,422 | —$592,924| $595,812 | _$595,812| $611,627| $612,929 | $623,809 |. $644,872 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 | $660,706 | __ $660,706 | __ $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706] $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A NA N/A| $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $679,591 | $679,591 | $679,591| $679,591 $679,591| $679,591| $679,591 $679,591| $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget $660,706 | $628,544 | $504,090 | $375,047 | $274,251 | $184,920] $184,077 $150,169 $86,667 $83,779 | $83,779 $67,964 $66,662 $55,692 $34,719 3 [IMPACT ASSESSMENTI/MITIGATION PLANNING _| | | | Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0%) 1% 5% 7%| 10% 16% 31%] 52% 62% 75%| 90% 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0%) 0% 0% 5% | 10% 25% 40%) 50% 60% 80%) 95% 100% 100%) 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7%! 20% 37% 55% 69% 82% 89% 96% 99% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% | 0% 0% 0% | WE 5% 7% 9% 16% 31% 52%| 62% 74%| 90% 98% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $29,000 | $30,000 $85,000 $90,000 | $57,000 $58,000] $117,000, $90,000 $28,010 $0 | $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A INVA [OTT N/A N/A N/A] $10,408 | $81,590 $99,490 | $111,370| $88,030 $78,700 | $42,295 | $37,600 | $18,000 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $383 $64 $0 | $5,788 $23,901| $10,408 $14,998 | $41,883 $92,212 | $126,888 $59,150 $73,790 | __ $97,136 $49,174 [. Base Planned $ (to date) $0 | $0 $0 $29,000 | $59,000 | $144,000 | $234,000 | $291,000 | $349,000| $466,000 $556,000 | $584,010| $584,010 | $584,010| $584,010 ce Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A __NA NA N/A N/A] $40,544 | $122,134 | $221,624] $332,994 $421,024| $499,724| $542,019| $579,.619| $597,619 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 | $383 $447 $447 | _-$6,235 $30,136 | $40,544 | $55,542 | $97,425 | $189,637 | $316,525 | $375,675| $449,465 | $546,601 | $595,775 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | _ N/A\ N/A| NIA NAl CNA N/A] $22,602, $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602| $22,602 | $22,602| $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010| $606,612 $606,612| $606,612| $606,612 $606,612| $606,612| $606,612 $606612| $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $584,010 | $583,627 | $583,563 $583,563 | $577,775 | $553,874 | $566,068 $551,070 | $509,187] $416,975 $290,087| $230,937| $157,147| $60,011 $10,837 6/16/98 TASK SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 06- 13-98 SRD QUARTER 1996. =i | ATH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 i ____ monty] sunwut [| aue [sep =| oct | nov [- | Fes MAY JUN dust ave see ALTERNATIVE SELECTION | | | Actual % Work Completed 0% | 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20%| 35% 50% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% 61% 80% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0%) 5% 15% 91%) 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% | 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ~=—(i% 0% - 19% 33% 51% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,400 $74,400 $77,400 | ___ $58,400 $60,875 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A NA N/A N/A 7 $0 | $15,000 $35,000 $52,000 $62,000 $72,000] $69,000, $29,972 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $1,369 $0 $0 $0 $o|—— —— “$0- $0 $0 | $1,275 $34,764 $27,023 $46,260 $59,360 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $32,400 $106,800 $184,200 $242,600 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A $1,369 | $16,369 $51,369 | $103,369) $165,369| $237,369 | $306,369 | $336,341 | $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 | $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 | $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 | $2,644 | _ $37,408 $64,431 | $110,691 | $170,054 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475| $303,475| $303,475] $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget _NA\ N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A| $32,866 | ‘$32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 | $32,866| $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 | Total Task NTE Budget $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341] $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341| $336,341) $336,341 | $336,341 | Actual Remaining Task Budget $303,475 | $302,106 | $302,106 | $302,106 | $302,106 | $302,106] $334,972| $334,972| $334,972] $334,972 $333,697 | $298,933 | $271,910 $225,650 | $166,290 | | | Actual % Work Completed 0%, 0% 0% 0% 1% 8% 11% 20% 22% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0%, 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 11% 19% = Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A 0%| 1% 1% 1%) 2% 2% 13%) ___ 32% 43% [Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A N/A N/A 2% 17%| 39% 48% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A : Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0%. 0% 0% 0%! 0% 0% 0%! 0% 0% 0% 1% 8% 11%] 21% 23% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $5,772 $1,572 | $5,772 $1,582 $31,570 | $31,570 srs | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A $0 | $6,100 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $43,300 | _ $78,052 $42,017 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A $332 $65,634 | $100,386 | $42,017 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) Ni N/A| NAT N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A Actual $ Expended (this period) | $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $4,991 $29,405 $13,991 | $44,991 $10,284 Base Planned §$ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 $7,344 | $13,116 $14,698 $46,268 | $77,838 $135,408 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 | _- $6,100 $6,100 $6,100 | $10,100| $10,100 L $53,400 | $131,452| $173,469 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A] $10,432 $76,066 $176,452 | $218,469 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A} N/A N/A Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 sol «$0 a) $0 $4,991 $34,396 $48,387 | $93,378 | $103,662 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570 $402,570| $402,570| $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570] $402,570| $402,570| $402,570| $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A —_N/A| N/A| $45,000 $45,000 | _ $45,000 $45,000 DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A DFI Contract Amend. #7 Budget N/A N/ALsONA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A] N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A| N/A| _N/A _N/A N/A| N/A N/A Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570] $402,570| $402,570| $402,570| $407,474 $407,474| $407,474| $407,474 $407,474 | $452,474| $452,474) $452,474 | $452,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570] $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570| $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474| $407,474 $402,483 | $418,078| $404,087 | $359,096 | __ $348,812 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 is in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DF! Contract Amend #6 #7 are in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 is in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 6/16/98 an) ae 6 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 06-13-98 a Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 is in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 are in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 is in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 | 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997. 3RD QUARTER 1997 | MONTH] JUN/JUL AUG [sept oct NOV DEC | JAN. | Fes. [MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP [_ANILCA APPLICATION | | | Actual % Work Completed 0% | 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0% 0%| 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0%| Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| __ NA, N/A N/A 0%) 0% O%| ————_—i 0% 0%) OH 0% O%_ 0%| Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0%| 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) _ $0 $0 __ $0 $0, $0 — $O} $o, $0 $o| $0. $o| $0 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A) N/A N/A N/AI N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $441 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A| NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A CNA “NAL ONAL ONAL N/A Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 go| ss $o)~——<“‘é‘aSOLCO*;*;*;*‘«SG|OCYCL;SC gol —s—isSO|S—S—=«SOD $0 | $0 $441 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | _$247,616| $247,616| $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A| NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A| Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A NA ~~ N/AL.—~*é«<WNA — NAL ONAT CL N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 | $247,616| $247,.616| $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 $247,616| $247,616| $247,616 | $247,616 | _ $247,175 STUDIES l Actual % Work Completed 1%| 5% 7%| 8% 14% 27% 35% 48% 55%| 60% 60% 68% 70% 75% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1%) 5% 9% 21%| 51% 73% 73%| 73% 76% 78% 80% 83%| 87% 91%| «91% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A NAL N/A N/A 27% 38% 55% 56%| 56%| «67% 78% 89% 90% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% | 3% 7% 7%| 8% 14%), 27% 33% 47% 55% 60% 61% 67% | 70% 73% Base Planned $ (this period) $927 | $3,927 $4,427 $12,200 $30,325 $22,780 $0 | $0 $2,300 $2,300 | $2,280| $2,300] $4,139 | $4,175 | $0 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A] $13,352) $10,492 $18,035 $500 | $500 $11,156 $11,300 $11,207 $802 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $2,569 $4,177 $637 | $1,148 $5,705 $13,352 | $5,455 $14,793 $8,252 | $5,157 $440 $5,855 | $3,299 $3,279 Base Planned $ (to date) $21,481 $51,806 $74,586 | $74,586 | $74,586 $76,886 $79,186 | $81,466 $83,766 | $87,905 $92,080 $92,080 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A| $27,588 | $38,080 | $56,115 $56,615 | $57,115 $68,271 $79,571 | _ $90,778 $91,580 Actual $ Expended (to date) $7,383 | $8,531 $14,236 $27,588 $33,043 $47,836 $56,088 $61,245 $61,685 $67,540 | $70,839 $74,118 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) _ $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480| $101,480) $101,480/ $101,480] $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A| N/A N/A\ N/A NA| NAA N/A|, _NA| N/A|_ N/A] N/A] N/A\ N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480| $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget $101,480 | $98,911 $94,734 $94,097 $92,949 $87,244 $73,892 | $68,437 $53,644 $45,392 | $40,235 $39,795 $33,940 | $30,641 $27 362 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Actual % Work Completed 5%| 15% 50% 60%| 70% 77% | 79% 84% 87% 87% 95% | 95% 95% Base Planned % Complete $(todate)| 55% 18%| 52% 63%] 68% 78%| 86%, AT 91%] 91% 94% __ 97% | 100%| 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A} N/A N/A N/A\ 77%| 79% 81% 81%| 81% 88% 95% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 60%| 70% 74%| 77%| 79% 84% 87% 87% 90% 94%| 94% 94%| Base Planned $ (this period) __ $9,600 $27,600 $68,900 $20,980 $10,800 $20,680 | $16,600 $9,955 $0 $0 | $0 | $5,500 $5,500 | $6,540 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A NAL N/A $7,645 | $4,000] —_—«$2,601 | $0 | $0 $15,000 $14,000 | $10,026 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,330 $17,007 $69,770 $23,487 | $20,840 $7,949 $7,645 | $2,827 $10,789 $4,825 | $33 $7,640 $7,510 | $14 | $0 | __ Base Planned $ (to date) $9,600 | _ $37,200[ $106,100| $127,080 | $137,880 | $158,560] $175,160) $185,115 | $185,115| $185,115| $185,115 | $190,615] $196,115 | $202,655 | $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| NA| -—SON/A|__—- $157,028 $161,028 | $163,629| $163,629| $163,629| $178,629] $192,629 $202,655 | $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,330 $27,337 $97,107 | $120,594 | $141,434 | $149,383| $157,028 | $159,855 | $170,.644| $175,469| $175,502| $183,142] $190,652 | $190,666 | $190,666 |__ Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655] $202,655| $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | sma | Sage | $202,655 | $202,655 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA CONVALst~‘C‘<é‘NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A) N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655| $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 $202,655] $202,655] $202,655| $202,655| $202,655| $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $192,325 $175,318 | $105,548 $82,061 $61,221 $53,272 $45,627 $42,800 $32,011 $27,186 $27,153 $19,513 $12,003 | $11,989 $11,989 SIGE SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: = PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT es S | 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 4ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK. MONTH] JUNAJUL | AUG SEP oct NOV DEC. | JAN |. FEB MAR APR MAY JUN AUG SEP | 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING __ | | Actual % Work Completed | 1%) 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% 25% 36% 45% 50% 60% 78% 98% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) | 1%| 2% 4% 9%) 23% 31% 44% | 57% 71% 88%| 97% 98% 98% | 98% 98% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) NANA N/A N/A| N/A N/AI 18% 36% 53% 71%| 85%| 98% 98% 98%| 98% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% | 1% 1%| 1% ss 12%| ss isIT%C(it«édBM_ 20% 24%| 36% 44%! «50% 60% 77% 97% Base Planned $ (this period) $2,580 | $2,137 $2,137 $10,337 | $27,417 $14,557 | $23,697 | * $25,557 $26,837 $32,397 | $16,076 $2,132 $0 $0 all Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A NAL ONAL CNA. NA| $1,937 | __ $33,000 $33,000 $35,000 | $25,000| $25,330 | _ $o | $0 | $0 | Actual $ Expended (this period) $1,694 | $0 $1,080 $0 | $20,307 | $9,513 $1,937 | $2,746 | $8,432 $23,434 | $13,944 $11,012 | $19,261 | $33,336 $36,656 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,580 | $4,717 $6,854 $17,191 | $44,608 $59,165 $82,862 | $108,419| $135,256 | $167,653 $183,729| $185,861| $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) | N/A| N/A NA CN/AL N/A N/A| $34,531 | $67,531 | $100,531 | $135,531 | $160,531 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,694 | $1,694 $2,774 $2,774 | $23,081 $32,594 $34,531 | $37,277 $45,709 $69,143 $83,087| $94,099| $113,360 $146,696 | $183,352 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861| $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | NAL _ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA) N/A] N/A\ NA N/A, NAA NA CNA CNA Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861| $189,861| $189,861] $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861| $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $188,167 | $188,167 | _$187,087| $187,087 |__ $166,780 | _$157,267| $155,330 $152,584 | $144,152| $120,718 $106,774 $95,762 $76,501 $43,165 $6,509 TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 — a Actual % Work Completed 1%] 5% 412%] 18%! 24% 30% 33% 38% 46%| 51% 55% 60% | 68% 74% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1%| 5% 12% 22% | 31% 41% 47% 51% 55% 60% | 64% 69% 74%| 79% 83% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(todate)} = N/A, N/A] NAY NA| NAA N/A] 33%| — 42%| 49%] 56%, 62% 69% 75%) 81%) 84% Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A 68% 75% 81% 84% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1%| 6% 12% 18%| 24% 30% 33% | 37% 42% 46%| 51% 55% 60%| 67% 73% Base Planned $ (this period) $20,791 | $144,150 | $199,209] $298,662 | $295,087 | $287,830] $181,342 $116,157| $116,001| $153,269| $147,528| $130,424] $170,609| $134,741 | $119,445 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A] $120,608 | $269,226 | $235,588 | $207,687 $182,530| $219,686] $198,895 $196,470 $87,794 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A| $220,018] $221,229] $218,804| $87,794 _ Task 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (this period) | N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A\ NAT OUNAAL~«~*«SNAASTYC ~ N/AL N/A N/A| N/A| N/A N/A Actual $ Expended (this period) $27,949 | $142,820 | $198,987] $163,015 | $212,219| $178,481] $120,608 $119,443| $165,199| $131,611 $151,695| $150,792| $149,769 $236,586 | $183,774 Base Planned $ (to date) $20,791 | $164,941 | $364,150 | $662,812 | $957,899 | $1,245,729 | $1,427,071 | $1,543,228 | $1,659,229 | $1,812,498 | $1,960,026 | $2,090,450 | $2,261,059 | $2,395,800 | $2,515,245 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A| NA N/A N/A| N/A N/A] $1,044,079 | $1,313,305 | $1,548,893 | $1,756,580 | $1,939,110 | $2,158,796 | $2,357,691 | $2,554,161 | $2,641,955 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| i N/A| $2,159,128 | $2,380,357 | $2,599,161 | $2,686,955 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) | _ NA| NA N/A N/A NAL NAL. N/A _ _NA N/Al «NIA N/A N/A N/A |___Actual $ Expended (to date) $27,949 | $170,769 | $369,756 | $532,771 | $744,990 | $923,471 | $1,044,079 | $1,163,522 | $1,328,721 | $1,460,332 | $1,612,027 | $1,762,819 | $1,912,588 | $2,149,174 | $2,332,948 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A| N/A NA «NAL N/A N/A| $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A|sONAA N/A N/A N/A N/A| “N/A| $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000 DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A DFl Contract Amend. #7 Budget | __ N/A| NA| NA NAL N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A NA NAL ONAL ONAL N/A DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A| N/A N/A\ NAL sCONVA NAL N/A NAL CONIA N/A| NAL ——sONVA N/A| N/A N/A Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| NA N/A N/A N/A N/A $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,015,474 | $2,872,654 | $2,673,667 $364,150 : $3,191,469 $858,521 Total Project NTE Budget Actual Remaining Project Budget ha BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,245,729 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS S $923,471 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,146,469 | $3,146,469 | $3,146,469 | $3,146,469 | $3,146,469 | $3,191,469 | § $2, 510,652 $2,298,433 | $2,119,952 | $2,102,390 | $1,982,947 | $1,817,748 | $1 686,137 | $1,534,442 | $1,428,650 | $1,278,881 | $1,042,295 — 579 : $413,500 - $431,221 : $424,795 $625,422 - | : $609,903 SS | $483,159 $3,191,469 | $3,191,469 |__| REV. 4+DFI PLANNED QTR TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $610,235 | $527,827 Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED QTR TOTA $369,756 “$553,715 $405,250 $434,098 Ee $570,129 REV. 1+DFl PLANNED YRLY TOTAL : | $923,471 Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED YRLY TOTALS | $923,471 | ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 | $553,715 $405,250 [ $434,098 ee $570,129 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS | | $923,471 | 6/16/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: s PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT os ise 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 4998 | 38RD QUARTER 1998 | 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH] OCT MAY ] JUL [_aue | SEP oct. | nov | pec | 1 SCOPING | | | : Actual % Work Completed 99%) 100% 1009 | | | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100%). 100% 100% 1009 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%| | 100% 100%] 100% 100% i 100% 1009 100%) 100% 100% 100%! 100% _ 100%| | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 99% 100% 100%| 100%. 100%| - 100%) 1009 | Le | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 ___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 { ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) $2,850 | $1,978 $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $351,050 $351,050| $351,050] $351,050 $351,050] $351,050] $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050| $351,050 $351,050 $261,050 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839] $374,839 $374839/ $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 | | Actual $ Expended (to date) $372,861 | $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839 | $374,839 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050| $351,050/ $351,050] $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050] $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 : CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $23,789 | ‘$23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 | ‘$23,789 $23,789 $23,789 __ $23,789 | $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 | | Total Task NTE Budget $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839] $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 | $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $1,978 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | | INVENTORY | Ta | | | Actual % Work Completed 95% 97% 97% 97%) 98% 99% 100% | 100% | | - | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%| 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%|_ 100% | 1009 100%, 100% 100%| 100%) 100%| -100%| | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 95%. 97% 97% 97% 98% 99% 100% 1009 | | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | : Rev. 1 Planned $(thisperiod) | == $0, $0 $0 $o| _—s go $o{ _—— $0 $0 | 0 $0 $0 | __ $0. $o| «0 | : ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) $61 | $12,141 $882 $3,406 $7,309 $7,453 $3,459 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 | : Base Planned $ (to date) $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | Seesoras | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706) $660,706 | $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591} $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) $644,933 | $657,074 | $657,956| $661,362 $668,671 $676,124} $679,583 | $679,583 | [a | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706] $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 | Actual Remaining Task Budget $22,517 $21,635 $18,229 | $10,920 $3,467 $8 | IMPACT ASSESSMENTI/MITIGATION F $34,658 | Actual % Work Completed 98%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1009 | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1009 100% 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| ————:100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1009 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%, =: 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 98%) 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% | | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $8,993 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | ~ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) $59 $10,706 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | : Base Planned $ (to date) $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010] $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 | __ $584,010 ce _ Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612| $606,612 $606,612| $606,612| $606,612| $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 im $606,612 | $606,612 Actual $ Expended (to date) _ $595,834 | $606,540| $606,540| $606,540 $606,540 | $606,540| $606,540 $606,540 | | i‘ Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010| $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010| $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010] $584,010} $584,010 | $584,010 : CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $22,602 | $22,602| $22,602| $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602) $22,602 ~ $22,602, $22,602 | $22,602] $22,602 | $22,602 | —_ $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $606,612 | $606,612| $606,612| $606,612) $606612| $606612| $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612| $606,612| $606,612 $606,612| $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $10,778 $72 $72 $72 | $72 $72 $72 | $72 | | Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 is in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 are in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 is in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 06-13-98 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 is in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 are in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DF Contract Amend #8 is in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. TASK So MONTH] ocT | _NOV_ DEC JAN |. FEB MAR. APR MAY JUL AUG SEP OCT ALTERNATIVE SELECTION | | Actual % Work Completed 94% | 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100%| 1009 | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%| 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100%| 1009 100%| 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%) =: 100% 100% 100%) 100%| 100%] 100% 1009 100% 100% | +=: 100% 100%) 100%| —: 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 93% 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100%! 1009 | | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $o, ss $0 $0 $0) $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $141,782 | $24,482 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 $303,475| $303,475| $303,475) $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475| $303,475 | $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341] $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $311,833 | $336,315 | $336,315| $336,315 $336,315 | $336,315] $336,315 $336,315 | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475| $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475| $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 = $32,866 | $32,866] $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341] $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341] $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget $24,508 $26 $26 $26 — $26 $26 $26 $26 | | EVAL PREPARATION | | f= * 3 Actual % Work Completed 30%| 58% 84% 88% 92% 92% 85% | 939 | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 50%! 55% 60% 66%) 85% 95% 100% 1009 100%} 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 59%! 66% 73% 85% 92%| ——:100% 100%) 1009 100%! 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100%| Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) 62%) 64% 74% 85% 92% 100% 100%) 1009 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 85% 929 98%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% : Actual % Expended $ (to date) 31% 56% 83% 87%) 92% 92% 85%| 939 | Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $42,570 $18,742 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $66,200 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $30,001 $1,904 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) $69,702 $67,700 $56,187 $62,900 | $39,500 $40,502 | $1,904 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A] $124,294 | $50,000 $15,000 | $15,000 $0 $0 | $0 $0 |___ Actual $ Expended (this period) $39,324 | $168,703| $149,939 $22,158 $26,430 $4,377 | $124,294 | $59,329 | Base Planned $ (to date) $199,978 | $221,548] $241,118] $266,688) $341,258] $383,828] $402,570| $402,570 $402,570 $402,570| $402,570] $402,570| $402,570] $402,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $239,669 | $268,669| $297,669| $347,569 $375,569| $405,570] $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 | $407,474] $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) $288,171 $355,871 | $412,058] $474,958 $514,458 | $554,960| $556,864 $556,864 $556,864 | $556,864 | $556,864| $556,864 | $556,864 | $556,864 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A| $638,887 | $688,887 $736,015 | $751,015 | $751,015| $751,015 | $751,015 | $751,015 Actual $ Expended (to date) $142,986 | $311,689| $461,628] $483,786 | $510,216| $514,593] $638,887 $698,216 | jt Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570 $402,570[ $402,570] $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570] $402,570| $402,570| $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000: $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000 DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400. $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 DFI Contract Amend. #7 Budget $3,502 $3,502 $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502, $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 | $89,487 $89,487 | $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 | $89,487 $89,487 Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A] $194,152 | $194,152 $194,152 $194,152 | $194,152] $194,152) $194,152 | $194,152 Total Task NTE Budget $467,376 | $556,864 | $556,864 | $556,864 $556,864 | $556,864 | $751,015 | $751,015 $751,015 | $751,015| $751,015] $751,015 | $751,015 | $751,015 Actual Remaining Task Budget $324,390 | $245,175 $95,236 $73,078 $46,648) $42,271] $112,128 $52,799 | SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 06-13-98 8 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT ee : : 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 = 38RD QUARTER 1998 | 4TH QUARTER 1998 - MONTH OCT. | NOV. : JAN FEB. MAR | MAY : JUN JUL AUG SEP. ANILCA APPLICATION | | | Actual % Work Completed 3%| 3% 3% 3%) 3% | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0%) 0% 0% 60% 74% 84% 94%) 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) _ 0% 0% 0% 0%! 0% 17% _ _ 86% 90%) _ 93% 96% 98%! 100% Task 586 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A| NAL ON N/A| N/A N/A 7 84% 100%! 100%| 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 4% 4% 4% 4%) 4% 21% | Base Planned $ (this period) $0; sé $0 ___ $0] $0 $0| $39,100 | $25,100 | $25,100 —-$35,100| $24,600| $24,600) $14.416| —*$0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $42,900 $55,563 | $33,700 $33,804 | $8,200 $8,700 $6,660 | $6,163 $3,860 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A] ($51,535)| $5,000 $20,000 | $8,466 $0 $0 | $0 $0 oe Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,176 | $345 $0 $0 | $0 $40,573 ($51,535) $0 | | | Base Planned $ (to date) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,100 | $64,200 $148,900 | $184,000 $208,600 $233,200 $247,616 $247,616 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $42,900 $98,463 | $132,163 $214,033 $222,233 $230,933 $237,593 | $243,756 $247,616 | Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) | __ N/A NANA NAL NAT. NA; «$0, ——_—«*$5,000 | $45,000 $53,466 | $53,466| $53,466 | $53,466 | $53,466 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,617 | $10,962 $10,962 $10,962 $10,962 $51,535 $0 | $0. | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A\_ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/ N/A| N/A N/A| N/A| N/A N/A | Le Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A} N/A N/A N/A! N/A N/A] ($194,150)) ($194,150 ($194,150) ($194,150)} ($194,150)} ($194,150); ($194,150) ($194,150) & Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $53,466 | $53,466 $53,466 $53,466 $53,466 $53,466 $53,466 $53,466 Actual Remaining Task Budget $236,999 | $236,654 $236,654 $236,654 | $236,654 $196,081 $53,466 | $53,466 | STUDIES | | Actual % Work Completed 85%) 85% 85% 95%) 100% 100% | | _ [Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 91%| 91% 91% 91% 91% 96% 96%. 969 96% ——=s«d96%|_—=—=~=«dOM|_-—=—=«100%, 100%| _—:100%| | _ |Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 90% | 90% 90% 90% | 90%| 96% 96% | 969 96%) 96% 100% 100%) 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 82%) 83% 84% 96%) 100% 100% 100%) 1009 | | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0. $0 $5,400 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $4,000 $0 | $0. $0 | : Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $5,900 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $4,000 $0 | $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $9,415 $403 $12,550 | $3,887 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 : Base Planned $ (to date) $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 | $92,080 $97,480 $97,480 | $97,480 $97,480 | $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $97,480 $97,480 | _ $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 | $101,480| $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 | | Actual $ Expended (to date) $83,533 | $83,936 $85,039 $97,589 | $101,476 $101,476 $101,476 | $101,476 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 $101 ,480 : CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A| N/ N/A N/A N/A N/A) N/A N/A | : Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 : Actual Remaining Task Budget $17,947 | $17,544 $16,441 $3,891 | $4 $4 $4 | $4 | | ENGINEERING FIELD WORK | | L | | | Actual % Work Completed 98%) 100% 100% 100%, 100% 100% 100% 1009 | | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) | 100%| 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100%, 1009 100% 100% 100% 100%) -—-:100%| +=: 100% -. |Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%) 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100%| 100% 1009 100%) 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 97% | 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100%) 1009 | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | _ $0 _ $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 _ $0 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | Actual $ Expended (this period) $6,523 | $5,421 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655] $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655] $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 - $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $197,189 | $202,610 $202,610 $202,610 $202,610 $202,610 $202,610 $202,610 | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655] $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655. CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A} N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ N/A. N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A | Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 same Actual Remaining Task Budget $5,466 | $45 $45 $45 | $45 $45 $45 $45 | | Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 is in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 are in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 is in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 6/16/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Mi PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 06-13-98 |. | 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 | 3RD QUARTER 1998 | 4TH QUARTER 1998 4 TASK : MONTH] oct | Nov. | DEC __ JAN | FEB maR | APR | may | gun | suc | auc SEP oct. | NOV DEC 9 | PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING | | | Fe Actual % Work Completed 99%! 99% 99% 99%) 100% 100% 100%| 100% | - | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98%) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100%} 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98%| 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 10036 NNN 100% 100%| | |___ Actual % Expended $ (to date) 99%) 99% 99% 99%| 100% 100% 100% 100% | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 | $0 $0 _ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $o[ $0 $0| $4,000 | $0 WE S01] | Actual $ Expended (this period) $3,909 $1,058 $165 $a81-|—__— $087 aaa T,) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861| $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 a. Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861| $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $187,261 | $188,319| $188,484] $188,865 $189,852| $189,852] $189,852| $189,852 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861| $189,861] $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861] $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | _ N/A\ N/A| NA __NA| N/A N/A N/A; sNA N/A N/A sNA NA N/A| NA | Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861] $189,861| $189,861| $189,861| $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861| $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | Actual Remaining Task Budget $2,600 | $1,542 $1,377 $996 | $9 $9 | $9 | | TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 [ Actual % Work Completed 80% 85% 90% 90%] 91% 93% 95% 97% | | |__| Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 85%| 85% 86% 87%| 89% 91% 93% | 94% 96%! 98% 99% 100%) 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 86%| «87% 88% 90% | 91% 93% 95% | 96% _ 99% 99% 99%] ——:100%| 100%| _ 100% | Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) 86% 86% 88% 90%! 91% 93% 95% 96% 99%) 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/AI N/A N/A N/A\ N/A N/A 95% | 97% 99% 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 79% 84% 89% 90%) 91% 93% 95%! 97% | | | Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 | $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 | $74,570 $47,970 $57,842 | $25,100 $25,100 $35,100 #26)600 | $28,600 $14,416 $0 ce Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $75,193 | $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $78,801 i $57,467 | $33,700 $33,804 | $8,200 $12,700 $10,660 $6,163 $3,860 | Rev. 1 + DFI Planned §$ (this period) $78,695 | $67,700 $56,187 $62,900 | $39,500 $89,302 $57,467 | __ $33,700 $33,804 | $8,200 $12,700 | _ $10,660 | $6,163 $3,860 | |Task 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (this period) N/A| N/A N/A N/A\ N/A N/A| $76,218 $55,000 $35,000 $23,466 $0 $0 $0 $0 : Actual $ Expended (this period) $214,099 | $225,237 $152,089 $38,495 | $38,613 $52,403 $76,218 $59,329 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 __ [____Base Planned $ (to date) $2,579,815 | $2,601,385 | $2,620,955 | $2,646,525 | $2,721,095 | $2,769,065 | $2,826,907 | $2,852,007 $2,936,707 | $2,971,807 | $3,000,407 | $3,029,007 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | ee Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $2,717,148 | $2,746,148 | $2,775,148 | $2,825,048 | $2,853,048 | $2,931,849 | $2,989,317 | $3,023,017 $3,104,886 $3,113,086 | $3,125,786 | $3,136,446 | $3,142,609 | $3,146,469 Ee Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) $2,765,650 | $2,833,350 | $2,889,537 | $2,952,437 | $2,991,937 | $3,081,239 | $3,138,707 | $3,172,407 $3,254,276 | $3,262,476 | $3,275,176 | $3,285,836 | $3,291,999 | $3,295,859 -— | Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A| N/A N/A\ N/A N/A|_ $3,130,102 | $3,185,102 $3,272,230 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 Actual $ Expended (to date) $2,547,047 | $2,772,284 | $2,924,373 | $2,962,868 | $3,001,481 | $3,053,884 | $3,130,102 | $3,189,431 | [ Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $5.08 428 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047| $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | __ $103,047 | DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget $45,000 ‘$45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000: $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 [| __pFi contract Amend. #6 Budget $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 DF Contract Amend. #7 Budget | $3,502 | —$3,502| —‘$3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502| $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 —«$3,502| —« $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 | DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A| $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 | $89,487 $89,487 | $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 | $89,487 $89,487 | SS Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 ao Total Project NTE Budget $3,206,371 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 Actual Remaining Project Budget $659,324 | $523.575| $371,486| $332,991 $294,378| $241,975| $165,758 $106,429 | IE BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $105,710 $148,110 e $142,542 $88,800 $43,016 a BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS | $1,375,226 ee oS S : $422,468 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS, : $133,193 eS $156,701 $139,233 $54,704 [ $20,683 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,851,677 oe : | $371,321 | REV. 1+DFl PLANNED QTR TOTALS $202,582 _ ee $191,702 $139,233 $54,704 2 $20,683 _ ao Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED QTR TOTA' $591,425 ee $129,511 $179,712 $62,089 $0 oe | REV. 1+DFl PLANNED YRLY TOTALS TT s1,966,066 - ae : $406,322 Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED YRLY TOTAL $2,000,902 $371,312 | ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $591,425 $129,511 $190,237 2] $0 | $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $2,000,902 : [ $319,748 |