Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S Intertie report 9-1998
CHUGACH ELECTRIC a ASSOCIATION, INC. ach Cis ASSOCIATION, INC. September 28, 1998 SEP 2 8 1999 Alask ~ Alaska Industrial Development a "ustrial Developm, and Export Authority *POrt Authorin, 480 West Tudor Road ber Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 OE Attention: Mr. Randy Simmons, Executive Director 5 8 hevne ke Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for September 1998 W.0.#E9590081 Dear Mr. Simmons: Please find enclosed 1 (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for the Month of September 1998. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. Sincerely, ae VY \) al Or vi . Eugene N. Bjornstad . \ AO q va) ak jo (AQ. (rent General Manager / 4 WwW) \\ CAOMQ2 REN. BOC DUND NIOM * : Enclosures: 1 (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report ENG/DLG;jb c: Lee Thibert \> Dana Joe Griffith Michael Massin Dora Gropp Jim Borden Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.0.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 ¢ Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 « FAX 907-562-0027 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Report for the Month of September 1998 Il. Il. Iv. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY. ...............ccccssscsosccescsccccscccosseccssccsscscsssceccscceseccscseescessccsscssescseseoecese 1-2 FINANGTA Lys o0cssesssesssssssecsveseneseesnesavenesescsesussussovsceosevsescuedsensseenessweesesacensnesnessseses 3 1. Total Project Expenditures Inception Through July 31, 1998 2. Chugach Statement for July, 1998 3. Bank Statement for August, 1998 SCHEDULE is ccxcssscscusssssessssvessovseessussossssseweneasvsssssscossessevsswoscessessesssessevsesssevecssssed 4 ITEMS FOR APPROVAL. ...............csccssccssccsecsecssceescescesscscceesceesceccsececcesceeseesseeeees 5 None ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION \isccess scesesccscovesssvssasecessassssvessavsssssvessesses sesecsceeacesesasswssses 6 None ITEMS FOR INFORMATION . ssssssscssssssovsssessevesssssesceusswoseosonsscssssesscessscssauscesscenese 7 1. Power Engineers Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, 2. 3. = September 18, 1998 Power Engineers Contract #95-208 Amendment #10 USFWS Contract #97-193 Amendment #2 RUS Contract #98-223 Amendment #5 SUMMARY Power Engineers/Dames and Moore’s effort for the EVAL preparation (Phase IB) is 99% complete. USFWS representatives, RUS consultant, Mangi Environmental, and the project team from PEI/Dames and Moore as well as Chugach’s Project Manager, met in Soldotna September 8 through 10, 1998 to discuss completion of the EVAL. USFWS requested major changes in the map and impact presentations as well as further reviews of the biology sections of the report. This will cause additional delays in completing the EVAL and the ANILCA application. We now expect these documents to be released in early December 1998. The EIS schedule was not updated and will be reviewed once the full impact of the latest changes can be assessed. Dames and Moore is proceeding with the requested changes, but will ask for additional funds of approximately $150,000 to $200,000, since their original proposal as well as other amendments did not include repeated preparation of the maps in question. Contingency funds remaining in this phase of the project cannot cover the additional expenses and it will be necessary to re-evaluate funding for _ - the EIS preparation. We are in the process of preparing a detailed assessment of the schedule and budget impact of USFWS’ changes, and will have documentation for discussion within the next two weeks. USFWS has requested major changes in the map and input presentations after learning that the Enstar pipeline route was preferred. This change in its position was not made known to Chugach or the consultants until September 8. As a result of this heightened scrutiny and concern on the part of USFWS after it earlier had little comment, results in added cost and delay. We hope their personnel will not again change the requirements upon receipt and review of their latest requested changes. Contract amendments for the EIS preparation (Phase IC) have been executed with the federal agencies and our consultants in the amount of $797,055. Funding for these amendments was approved in June by AIDEA and the IPG. Copies of the amendments are included. OO OO ———= \ \ \)\ Pre ‘a / VON Expenditures for Phase IB of the project stand as follows: DESCRIPTION POWER __|USFS/USFwSs/ | CHUGACH TOTAL ENGINEERS RUS L BUDGET $3,043,423 $100,000 $400,000] $3,543,423 ALLOCATED $19,981 *9| $40,000 $59,981 CONTINGENCY TOTAL $3,063,404 $100,000] $440,000] $3,603,404 AMENDMENTS $284,361 $31,437| $0 $315,798 TOTAL $3,347,765 $131,437 $440,000] $3,919,202 COMMITMENT | SPENT TO DATE $3,304,151 $130,557] $155,821] $3,590,529 % OF TOTAL 99% 99% 35% 92% Total Project expenditures as of September 18, 1998 are $4,546,193, which includes a payment to RUS for the EIS preparation in the amount of $97,670. Il. FINANCIAL 1. Total Project Expenditures Inception Through July 31, 1998 2. Chugach Statement for July 1998 3. Bank Statement for August, 1998 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Southern Intertie Transactions SEP 0 2 1998 Inception Through July 31, 1998 TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROVIECT Project Expenditures Year to Date Month Inception Through Ended Inception Through 12/31/97 6/30/98 7/31/1998 Through 7/31/1998 Direct Labor $108,471.09 $16,853.19 $3,372.12 $128,696.40 Indirect Labor 38,898.99 7,175.84 1,505.71 47,580.54 Power Engineers 3,739, 166.41 319,750.57 22,428.30 4,081,345.28 Miscellaneous 108,961.39 49,919.47 11,487.26 170,368.12 Total $3,995,497.88 $393,699.07 $38,793.39 $4,427,990.34 Grant Fund Expenditures Year to Date Month Inception Through Ended Inception Through 12/31/97 6/30/98 7/31/98 Through 7/31/1998 Direct Charges that Chugach has been Reimbursed for $3,842,318.24 $314,203.70 $173,312.97 (1) $4,329,834.91 Plus General, Administrative & Construction Overhead 19,211.59 2,117.07 866.56 (1) 22,195.22 Total Amounts Paid to Chugach $3,861,529.83 $316,320.77 $174,179.53 (1) $4,352,030.13 (1) Chugach July 16, 1998 invoice for May 1998 charges cc: Dora Gropp Alayne Switzer 8/28/98 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska 08/28/98 TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Kurt Parish, Plant Accountant SUBJECT: &9590081 - Southern Intertie Route Selection Study R ECEIVE r aus 28 199g TRANSMISSION SPECIAL PAQJECT You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Southern Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occurred during July 1998. Direct Labor 3,372.12 Indirect Labor 1,505.71 Power Engineers Invoice # 52768 21,502.22 Power Engineers Invoice # 52769 926.08 USDA - Rural Utililitiy Service 8,122.00 USDA - Rural Utililitiy Service 3,320.26 Photowright Lab - 48163 45.00 Sub-Total $38,793.39 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) 193.97 Total Charges $38,987.36 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As per your request, | will keep the original in the work order file. Concur: Ove x. fy Ss ignature 24/95 Date KP WOfiles/E9590081 Attachments 8/28/98 ®@.0. © PS¥00N , Sec. / R ECEIVE r) Southern Intertie Grant Fund SEP 1° 1998 Bank Account Activity Summary August, 1998 TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJECT July Ending Balance Forward $344,723.75 Total Deposits $0.00 Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for June charges) ($59,658.85) Interest Earned $1,326.87 Balance August 31, 1998 $286,391.77 Oo IMAP Lee me srl e een Seem ant 000 01 00 DATE: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 08/31/98 PAGE: ACCOUNT: a 41100033 30 oo AIN BRANCH PO BOX 100720 ™NCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 DESCRIPTION “ALANCE LAST STATEMENT NTEREST iNTEREST INTEREST NTEREST NTEREST INTEREST RANSFER INTEREST TNTEREST NTEREST aNTEREST INTEREST NTEREST NTEREST INTEREST “NTEREST NTEREST INTEREST TNTEREST NTEREST ~NTEREST INTEREST \ALANCE THIS STATEMENT = 2s TO BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 59,658.85 146.46 40.40 40.08 40.09 40.10 120.05 39.86 39.87 39.87 39.88 L19<73 39.98 39.98 39.99 39.99 119.02 CONTINUED #* * ® 07/31/98 08/03/98 08/04/98 08/05/98 08/06/98 08/07/98 08/10/98 08/11/98 08/11/98 08/12/98 08/13/98 08/14/98 08/17/98 08/18/98 08/19/98 08/20/98 08/21/98 08/24/98 08/25/98 08/26/98 08/27/98 08/28/98 08/31/98 08/31/98 BALANCE 344,723.75 344,870.06 344,918.85 344,967.65 345,016.46 345,065.27 345,211.73 285,552.88 285,593.28 285,633.36 285,673.45 285,713.55 285,833.60 285,873.46 285,913.33 285,953.20 285,993.08 286,112.81 286,152.79 286,192.77 286,232.76 286,272.75 286,391.77 286,391.77 000 01 00 PAGE: 2 0) DATE: 08/31/98 ACCOUNT: 41100033 SDIeMM ELEC me settle Maer Asa CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I TOTAL CREDITS (21) 1,326.87 TOTAL DEBITS (1) 59,658.85 TAX ID NUMBER 92-0014224 INTEREST THIS STATEMENT 1,326.87 INTEREST PAID 1998 16,443.65 - END OF STATEMENT - PAGE: 1 of 2 O) ACCOUNT: 1106061 DATE: 08/31/98 First National Bank 090710100 OMe Wie ero Member FDIC 8 00008148 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION I SOUTHERN INTERTIE GRANT FUND 30 PO BOX 196300 Oo ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 0 MAIN BRANCH - TELEPHONE: 907-777-4362 ~- PO BOX 100720 ANCHORAGE AK 99510-0720 BUSINESS ACCOUNT 1106061 TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 92-0014224 LAST STATEMENT 07/31/98 -00 MINIMUM BALANCE -00 1 CREDITS 59,658.85 AVERAGE BALANCE -00 1 DEBITS 59,658.85 THIS STATEMENT 08/31/98 -00 =—=<c = =- == OTHER CREDITS == == ==--—--=-= DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT TRANSFER FROM REPURCHASE AGREEMENT ACCOUNT 41100033 08/11 59,658.85 ---- -- - - —- OTHER DEBITS ----\-fr--e-e DESCRIPTION DATE AMOUNT CHUGACH ELECTRIC BOOK TRNFR 08/11 59,658.85 -------- DAILY BALANCE - ------ - DATE onic osc + oe sBALANCE DATE.....2-..++BALANCE DATE cic cowie oo wBALANCE 08/11 -00 : Il. SCHEDULE CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE Fri 9/18/98 PHASE IB | 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID | Task Name % Comp. Act. Cost Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 41 | ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERI 66% | $4,464,347.03 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 39% $156,010.50 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUDIE 100% $871,650.00 4 EVAL & PREL.ENGINEERIN 98%| $3,306,129.53 5 SCOPING 100% $375,997.34 6 INVENTORY 100% $680,396.25 a; IMPACT/MITIGATION 100% $607,560.00 8 ALTERN.SELECTION 100% $335,392.00 9 EVAL (DRAFT EIS) 100% $783,056.00 10 ANILCA (FINAL EIS) 56% $29,747.20 11 STUDIES 100% $101,476.81 12 ENG.FIELD WORK 100% $202,645.44 13 PREL. ENGINEERING 100% $189,858.49 14 AGENCIES 63% $130,557.00 15 USFS 20% $34,954.00 16 USFWS 100% $24,600.00 17 RUS 96% $71,003.00 Task ES Summary Quang Rolled Up Progress TS Project: ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTE Date: Fri 9/18/98 Progress ME Rolled Up Task Milestone & Rolled Up Milestone © PH_IB.MPP Page 1 IV. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL None. V; ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION i Power Engineers Monthly Report Phase 1B — Environmental Analysis, September 18, 1998 2. Power Engineers Contract #95-208 Amendment #10 3. USFWS Contract #97-193 Amendment #2 4. RUS Contract #98-223 Amendment #5 ~! OR pauer REcEive D sep ! ggg TRANSMISSION SPECIAL PROJECT September 18, 1998 Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive, Building A Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: POWER Project #120376 — EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract #95-208 Monthly Status Report No. 25 For Period August 9 - September 12, 1998 Dear Dora: The following activities were performed during this invoicing period on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Preliminary Engineering portion of the Southern Intertie Project. Key Issues: e Completion of the Final EVAL. e Preparation of the ANILCA application. Invoice Period Overview: e Agency comment review. e Meeting with Fish and Wildlife. Work Planned for the Next Invoice Period: e Incorporate comment responses into the EVAL document. e Prepare revisons to maps and text resulting from the September 8-10 USFWS Meetings. e Continue preparation of draft ANILCA application. HLY 23-386 POWER Engineers, Incorporated Cs 3940 Glenbrook Dr. + P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey. Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association September 18, 1998 Page 2 Schedule: At the June 23 — 25 agency meetings, the schedule for completion of the EVAL, DEIS/EIS, ANILCA, and the tasks leading to the Record of Decision were discussed. As a result of those discussions, a milestone schedule was developed and was included with the July report. That schedule indicated a completion date for the EVAL of August 28, 1998. This date was based on a final comment review meeting with USFWS occurring during the week of August 3. USFWS was late completing their comments on the draft EVAL, and so this meeting was rescheduled for the week of September 7. At the meetings with USFWS on September 8-10, USFWS directed that significant changes in the maps and text be made for the final EVAL. The maps had previously been prepared based on prior reviews and discussions with RUS and USFWS, and the current direction from USFWS is different from agreements previously reached. It now appears that the EVAL and ANILCA application can be completed by December 1, 1998. Monthly Status Report Issues: Please refer to the Activities Summary attached for work completed and planned for each Task. Activity summaries are only included for Tasks 5 and 6, since all other tasks are completed. Project Overview: Total Budget $3,327,786 Actual $ Expended (to date) $3,304,151 Actual Remaining Project Budget $ 23,635 Contract Amendment No. 10 for $678,069, which provides for Power to furnish support to RUS and USFWS during the DEIS/EIS preparation and review periods, was agreed upon and signed during the past month. Contract Amendment No. 10 will be incorporated into the November 1998 monthly status report. Work under Contract Amendment No. 10 is not expected to begin until completion of the EVAL and submission of the ANILCA application. HLY 23-386 ) GR OUR Chugach Electric Association September 18, 1998 Page 3 Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Walbert or me. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. Ste Randy Pollock, P.E. Project Manager RP/Ik Enclosures ec: PROJECT TEAM HLY 23-386 A GE powEeR SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 120376 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY SEPTEMBER, 1998 INVOICE Project Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Total Base Not to Exceed $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 Budget aie Contract $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 $32,866 $4,904 N/A N/A | N/A NA | $103,046 Amendment No. 4 | DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A Amendment No. 5 DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $11,400 N/A N/A N/A N/A $11,400 Amendment No. 6 DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $3,502 N/A N/A N/A N/A $3,502 Amendment No. 7 DFI Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $89,487 N/A N/A N/A N/A $89,487 Amendment No. 8 Task 5 &6 N/A N/A N/A N/A $194,150 | ($194,150) N/A N/A N/A $0 Reallocation * Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A $31,926 N/A N/A N/A N/A $31,926 Amendment No. 9 Total Not to Exceed $374,839 $679,591 $606,612 $336,341 $782,941 $53,466 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,327,786 Budget Actual Budget $374,839 $679,583 $606,540 $336,315 $774,078 $24,635 $101,476 $202,610 $189,852 $3,289,928 Expended Through Previous Invoice Current Invoice $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,844 $5,379 $0 $0 $0 $14,223 Amount Actual Budget $374,839 $679,583 $606,540 $336,315 $782,922 $30,014 $101,476 $202,610 $189,852 $3,304,151 Expended Through Current Invoice Remaining $0 $8 $72 $26 $19 $23,452 $4 $45 $9 $23,635 Budget * Task 5 and 6 budget amounts reallocated per April 24, 1998 letter from Robert Martin to Randy Pollock. N/A $45,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A $45,000 HLY 23-386 SEPTEMBER 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 5 - EVAL PREPARATION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS EVAL Preparation agency comment review. meeting with Fish and Wildlife. Modify maps and text per September 8-10 USFWS meetings. Incorporate comment responses into the EVAL. KEY ISSUES: Production and distribution of the Final EVAL. SCHEDULE: Schedule for completing of this Task has been delayed as a result of USFWS comments. BUDGET: Contract amendments Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and the budget reallocation! for Tasks 5 and 6 are included in the budget ($402,570 + $4,904 + $45,000 + $11,400 + $3,502 + $89,487 + $194,150 + $31,926= $782,941). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining $782,941 782,922 19 SCOPE: The changes in scope resulting from the September 8-10 USFWS meetings will need to be discussed and negotiated during the next period. ' Tasks 5 and 6 budget amounts reallocated per April 24, 1998 letter from Robert Martin to Randy Pollock. HLY 23-386a SEPTEMBER 1998 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 6 - ANILCA APPLICATION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS ANILCA Application e continue preparation of the draft ANILCA application. KEY ISSUES: Completion of the ANILCA application. SCHEDULE: Schedule for completing of this Task has been delayed as a result of USFWS comments on the EVAL document. BUDGET: The budget reallocation” for Tasks 5 and 6 is included in the budget ($247,616 - $194,150 = $53,466). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 53,466 30,014 23,452 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. > Tasks 5 and 6 budget amounts reallocated per April 24, 1998 letter from Robert Martin to Randy Pollock. HLY 23-386a 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PEGs 1 O10 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 09-12-98 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 41ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] JUN/JUL AUG SEP oct | Nov DEC JAN MAR APR MAY. JUL 1 SCOPING | | Actual % Work Completed 5%| 20% 33%| 51% 72% 77% 93% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99%| 99% 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 2% 25% 33%! 52% 74% 87%| 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(todate)) === N/A NAL NA NAL ONAL 77%) 98% 100%] 100%| «100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5%| 30% 33%, 51% 63% 77% 93% 99% 99% 99%! —=ss«s97%|—i(ws‘éiGSOC“‘éSBG*|S#O#*#«CO% Base Planned $ (this period) $6,743 $81,045 ; $25,645 $67,045 $75,045 | $46,045 $23,645 $23,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) | NW NAL NAL ——sCWNACT’_—_séS$567,538) — $60,112 | $27,222 = $0,—(tsi«i HY $0 $0 $0 $0. | ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) ($558) $9,848 $63,340 $42,082 $67,538 $59,509 | _ $25,800 $0 ($593) ($7,434)| $1,087, «$580 | «$3,607 Base Planned $(to date) _| $90,533] $116,178 $183,223| $258,268 $304,313 $327,958| $351,050] $351,050 $351,050| $351,050| $351,050 $351,050| $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) _ —_N/AL NMA NAL N/A) _($:287,505 | $347,617 || $374,839 | $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 | ~ Actual $ Expended (to date) $15,925 $105,255| $104,697| $114,545 $177,885| $219,967| $287,505 $347,014| $372,814] $372,814 $372,221| $364,787] $365,824 $366,404| $370,011 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050 | $351,050| $351,050| $351,050 $351,050| $351,050] $351,050, $351,050| $351,050 $351,050 $351,050] $351,050 _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | = N/A N/A CNA N/A|—sCNA|_~—si$23,789 «$23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 ~~ $23,789 | — $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 | Total Task NTE Budget $351,050 $351,050| $351,050] $351,050 $351,050| $351,050| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839| $374,839| $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $335,125 $245,795 | $246,353 | $236,505 $173,165 | $131,083 $87,334 $27 825 $2,025 $2,025 | $2,618 $10,052 $9,015 $8,435 $4,828 2 INVENTORY | | Actual % Work Completed 0% 6% 25% 45%) 60% 67% 73% 80% 87% 88% 90% 92% 95% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 5% 23% 53% | 73% 83% 84% 84% 84% 84% 84% 87% 95% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| NA ONAL CNA NAL NAT 78%, 82%| 85% 86% —=ssiG%| = BOM] «= (| ~—Ss«100% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 5% 24% - 5B% 72% 73% | 78%| 87% 88% ———8B% 90% 90%. 92% 95% Base Planned $ (this period) $941 $29,441 | $121,000 $129,500 $69,768 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 | $1,000 $16,500 $52,000 $34,056 $1,000 |___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) _ NANA! N/A) | NA) _ N/A] $19,728 $58,932 | $20,240] $8,817 $3,000 | $17,500] $19,000 $29,613 | $26,975. ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $32,162 | $124,454 | $129,043 $100,796 | $89,331 $19,728 $33,908 $63,502 $2,888 | $0 $15,815 $1,302 $10,970 $20,973 Base Planned $ (to date) $941 $30,382 | $151,382 | $351,882 $481,382 | $551,150] $556,150 $556,150| $556,150] $556,150 $557,150 | $573,650] $625,650, $659,706 | $660,706 _____Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) _ _N/A’ NAL NAY NA NAL N/A] $495,514 $554,446 | $574,686 | $583,503 $586,503 | $604,003 | $623,003 $652,616 | $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $32,162| $156.616| $285,659 $386,455 | $475,786] $495,514 $529,422| $592,924 | $595,812 $595,812 | $611,627| $612,929 $623,899 | $644,872 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706] $660,706 $660,706| $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | N/A NAL ONAL CONASs~*~“«é«‘éNAXYLSCOW™*‘“‘sé«‘WNACYL’"COW”#C#dS 8,885 | $18,885 | $18,885 | $18,885 —$18,885| $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 | $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706] $660,706 $660,706| $660,706| $679,591 $679,591| $679,591| $679,591 $679,591| $679,591| $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget $660,706 | $628,544 | $504,090] $375,047 $274,251 | $184,920| $184,077. $150,169 $86,667 $83,779 $83,779 $67,964 $66,662 $55,692 $34,719 3. IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING | Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 10% 16% 31% 52% 62% 75%| 90% 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% | 0% 0% 5% | 10% 25% 40% 50% 60% 80% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(todate)) N/A N/A) N/A NAA N/A NAL 7%, 20%) 87% 5B% 9% 82%) 89% 9% 99% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% | 5% 7% 9% 16% 31% 52% 62% 74% 90% 98% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $29,000 _ $30,000 $85,000 $90,000 $57,000 $58,000] $117,000| $90,000 $28,010 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $(thisperiod) | = N/A N/A _ NAL NAA NAL NAA $10,408 | $81,590] $99,490 | $111,370 | $88,030 | ___$78,700| $42,295 $37,600 | _ $18,000 ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) _ $0 $383 $64 $0 | $5,788 $23,901 $10,408 $14,998 $41,883 $92,212 | $126,888 $59,150 $73,790 $97,136 $49,174 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $59,000 | $144,000] $234,000 $291,000] $349,000 $466,000 $556,000] $584,010] $584,010| $584,010 | $584,010 ____Rev.1Planned$(todate) | == N/A NAA) NAA N/A N/A, NAA] $40,544 $122,134 | $221,624 | $332,994 | $421,024 | $499,724 | $542,019 $579,619 | __ $597,619 ~ Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $383 $447 $447 «$6,235 $30,136 $40,544 $55,542 $97,425 | $189,637 $316,525 | $375,675| $449,465 $546,601 | $595,775 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010] $584,010 $584,010| $584,010] $584,010 $584,010| $584,010| $584,010 $584,010| $584,010| $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 ~_ CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget _ N/A Nal NALCO SCNNAST N/A| $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602, $22,602| $22,602| $22,602) $22,602| $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget ~ $584,010 $584,010| $584,010] $584,010 $584,010| $584,010| $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612| $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612| $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $584,010 $583,627 | $583,563] $583,563 $577,775 | $553,874] $566,068 $551,070| $509,187 | $416,975 | $290,087 | $230,937 | $157,147 | _- $60,011 $10,837 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFl Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 peace PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT ewe 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 4ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] JUN/JUL AUG SEP Oct NOV DEC JAN | _FEB APR | __ MAY [JUN | JUL| AUG SEP ALTERNATIVE SELECTION | Actual % Work Completed 0%| 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 10%| 20% 35% 50% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% | 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% | 11% 35% 61%| 80% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| N/A| N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A 0% 5% 31%, 49% 71% 91%) 100%] =: 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% ~~ 0%—Ss—(ité‘éi LSCC(‘(‘ét!OCOC~O!C(C 0%| 0% «0% 0% «NM 11%] 19% 33% 51% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,400 $74,400 $77,400 $58,400 $60,875 | Rev.1Planned$(thisperiod) | = =N/A NA N/A N/A. N/A|_ N/A $0 _ $15,000 $52,000 $62,000, —$72,000| $69,000, $29,972 | _ $0 | ~ Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $1,369 —$9-| $9 | pg | go $0 $0]. ~ gol $0. $1,275) -$34.764| $27,023 $46,260 $59,360 | Base Planned $ (to date) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $32,400 $106,800 | $184,200 $242,600 | $303,475 Rev.1Planned$(todatey) | NA, NAL NAT N/A N/A| N/A] _ $1,369 $16,369 | $51,369| $103,369 | $165,369| $237,369] $306 369 $336,341 | $336,341 ~ Actual $ Expended (to date) _ $0 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369) $1,369| $1,369 $1,369| $1,369] $1,369 $2,644 $37,408 $64,431 $110,691 $170,051 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475| $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget _|_ NA ONAL SONA N/A N/A N/A| $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866| $32,866) $32,866 | $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475| $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 | $336,941| $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget $303,475 $302,106 | $302,106 | $302,106 $302,106 | $302,106] $334,972 $334,972 | $334,972] $334,972 $333,697| $298,933] $271,910 | $225,650 | $166,290 EVAL PREPARATION Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% 0% 1% 8% 11% 20% 22% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%) 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 11%) 19% 34% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date] ===N/A NAL. ———CNAT SCN = N/A N/A 0% 1% 1% 1% 2%! 2% 18%) 82%] A |Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) N/A N/A Nal NA NAL ONAAT NA N/AI N/A N/A N/A 2% 17% 39% 48% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A [Amend. #9 Planned % Cmp $ (to date) NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA| NA SONAL CNA Actual % Expended $ (to date) ee 0%! s(% 0% 0% i %,Sti(‘éO 0% 0% ~~ 1%) BG 11%| 21% 23% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 $1,572 | $5,772 $1,582 | $31,570 $31,570 $57,570 "Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $0 $0 $4,000 $0] $43,300 | $78,052 | $42,017 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) | NWA ))COUNAALSt*é‘CONAA@L;SO#*;*‘;CWNAS~ “NAL ~SCOUNVATsti“‘é‘<CeWNATCO!”!”!”OUNAAL”~OO~*~*~*#*CWNAA@L#*COW#*#;#;&€(<SNAsi“‘(w”sSCWNAY:SCCCséC88382 $65,634 | $100,386 $42,017 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A) N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| __Amend. #9 Planned $ (this period) | === N/A N/A) NAT SONA _N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A __N/A’ NA; NAAT NAA CNA) CNA Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 | $0. $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $4,991| $29,405| $13,991) $44,991| _ $10,284 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $5,772 $7,344 $13,116 $14,698 | $46,268 $77,838 $135,408 | ___ Rev. 1 Planned $(to date) —_—| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $6,100 $6,100 $10,100| $10,100] $53,400 $131,452 | $173,469. Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) _ N/A, NAL ONAL N/A OC«WNALt~<“‘éC‘C“NALSO#*#*#*;&éNASCO#*~*~*;~;”#ONAA‘CWL*~S N/A NA CONV $10,432 $76,066 $176,452| $218,469 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A | __Amend. #9 Planned$(todate) | == NA NA| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A NA ONAL NAL NA CNA, CNA Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 | $0 go; $0 $0 | go{ $0,t—~<‘i:sés‘«SOONSCLSSCW go] si $4,991 | $34,396| $48,387 $93,378 | $103,662 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570 $402,570| $402,570] $402,570 $402,570] $402,570] $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | NA NAL NAL ON NAT N/A] __ $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 | $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget N/A) N/A N/A N/A N/A NA ~=~)—))hOUN/ALt~‘“‘é‘“‘NA N/A N/A $45,000] $45,000 —_ $45,000 $45,000 DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ___DFl Contract Amend. #7 Budget | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A NAL N/A CNA) NAA DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget _ — NA NAL SONAAT CS” NAL) OUNATt~*«“‘é~NASO”!”!””~OUNVALOw~*~*«CWNAA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A Contract Amend. #9 Budget | = N/A NAINA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA NA NAA, NAL CNA NAA) CNA Total Task NTE Budget $402,570 | $402,570 | _$402,570| $402,570 _$402,570| $402,570| $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474| $407,474 $407,474 | —$452,474| $452,474 $452,474 | $452,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570| $402,570] $407,474. $407,474 | $407,474 | $407,474 $402,483 | $418,078 | $404,087 | $359,096 | $348,812 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Page 3 of 10 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 09-12-08 | 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 4ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] _JUN/JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN [| Fee [| mar | apr [MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 6 ANILCA APPLICATION | | f Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0%) 0% 0% 0%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date} = N/A N/A) N/A) NMA NAL _N/A 0% 0%) OO 0%! OH 0% | Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A N/A NAT Amend. #9 Planned % Cmp $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A! N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% | 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_| $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) _ NA — NA; NAL CONAA N/A — NA; NA CNA N/A] N/A N/A N/A _ NAL NA; CNA | Amend. #9 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/AI ~ N/AI N/AI N/A NAL ON/A NA COUN/ALt~*~*é«<CNW N/A N/A N/AI Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 | $0 $441 __Base Planned $ (to date) ____ $0 | _$0_ ___ $0} $0 __$0 | So} 80 _ $0} $0] 808 8 $0, $0] 80 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A’ N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A Contract Amend. #9 Planned $(todatey = N/A N/A NAT NAA NA NAA ON N/A N/A] _ N/A\ NAL NAL NANA NAAT | Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 gol =—i(isgo|t~—“‘aSOOYLCOO*~*~*‘CSONNSC‘CC(CCO#SVO $0 $0 $0 $441 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616| $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget _| NANA CNA CNA NAA N/A N/A| N/A| NAA N/A. N/A NAL N/A CNA CNA | Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/AI N/A NA ONAL wal NA NANT N/A N/A N/A\ : Contract Amend. #9 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A\ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616] $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616| $247,616 $247,616 | $247,175 | 7 STUDIES _Actual% Work Completed | 1% 5% HTH B14 _ 27% 35% ____ 48%| 55% 60% 60%) 8% 70%) 75% | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) | 1%, 5% 9% 21%, 51%| 73%] = 78%, ~—C78%| OG] 78% 80% 83% 87% 91% 91% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A} N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 38% 55% 56% 56% 67% 78% 89% 90% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 3% 7% 7%| 8% 14% 27% | 33% 47% 55% 60% 61% 67% 70% 73% | Base Planned $ (this period) $927 $3,927 $4,427 $12,200 $30,325 $22,780 $0 | $0 $2,300 $2,300 $2,280 $2,300 $4,139 | $4,175 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $13,352 $10,492 $18,035 $500 $500 $11,156 $11,300 | $11,207 $802 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $2,569 $4,177 $637 $1,148 $5,705 $13,352 | $5,455 $14,793 $8,252 $5,157 $440 $5,855 $3,299 $3,279 | Base Planned $ (to date) $927 | $4,854 $9,281 $21,481 | $51,806 $74,586 $74,586 | $74,586 $76,886 $79,186 | $81,466 $83,766 $87,905 | $92,080 $92,080 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $27,588 $38,080 $56,115 $56,615 $57,115 $68,271 $79,571 | ‘$90,778 $91,580 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 | $2,569 $6,746 $7,383 $8,531 $14,236 $27,588 $33,043 $47,836 $56,088 $61,245 $61,685 $67,540 $70,839 $74,118 | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480[ $101,480| $101,480| $101,480| $101,480 $101,480| $101,480] $101,480 $101,480] $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480) $101,480| $101,480] $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget "$101,480 $98,911 $04.734| $94,097 $92,949| $87,244| $73,802 $68.437| «$5a,644| «$45,392 —«$40,295| —«$39,795| ~ $33,940 «$30,641 $27,362 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Reve 4/of'10) PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 09-12-68 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 4ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 | 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] JUNWJUL | AUG SEP oct | Nov DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL | AUG SEP [8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK | | Actual % Work Completed 5%| 15% 50% 60% 70% 74% 77% | 79% 84% 87% | 87% 90% 95% 95% 95% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 5% 18% 52% 63% 68% 78%| 86% 91% 91% 91%. 91% 94% 97% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(to date} == N/A N/A; si NA N/A N/A N/A 77% 79%| 1% BIG 81% 88%| -95%~=——s«100%| += 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 13% 48%| ss 60%,~——(issi70%~—i“‘(<‘éc A %*diLC~O!O!O!!OCTT%~UOCTO9% 84% 87% =i BT%| «MI 94% 94% 94% Base Planned $ (this period) $9,600 $27,600 $68,900 $20,980 $10,800 680] $16,600 | $9,955 $0 $0 $0 $5,500 $5,500 | $6,540 $0 | ___Rev.1Planned$(thisperiod) [| == N/A N/A; N/A N/A| NA $4,000 | $2,601 $0 | $0 $15,000 | -$10,026[ $0. | __ Actual $ Expended (this period) _ $10,330 | $17,007 $69,770 ; $7,949 $2,827 | _$10,789| $4,825. «$33 ~——«$7,640 $14 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $9,600 $37,200 | $106,100 | $127,080 | $137,880 | $158,560 | $175,160 $185,115 | $185.115| $185,115 $185,115 190.615 | $196,115 $202,655 | $202,655 _Rev. 1 Planned $(todate) | NVA NAL NAL NAA _NAI N/A] $157,028 $161,028 | $163,629 | $163,629 | $163,629 |__ $178,629| $192,629 $202,655 | __ $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) _ $10,330 $27,337 $97,107 | $120,594 $141,434| $149,383] $157,028 $159,855| $170,644] $175,469 $175,502 $183,142| $190,652 $190,666 | $190,666 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 $202,655| $202,655] $202,655. $202,655 | $202,655] $202,655 $202,655| $202,655 _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | === N/A sOWNVAQ NA N/A wal ONAL CNA CNA N/A N/A| N/A NAL ONAL — NAL ONA Total Task NTE Budget | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655] $202,655 $202,655| $202,655] $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $192,325 | $175,318 | $105,548 $82,061 $61,221 $53,272 $45,627 $42,800 $32,011 $27,186 $27,153 $19,513 $12,003 $11,989 $11,989 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Actual % Work Completed 1%! 17% 18% 20% 36% 60% 78% 98% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% | 2% 4% 9%| 23% 31% 44% | 57% 88% 97% 98%) 98% 98% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(todate)| N/A SONA] SNA N/A N/A N/A 18%| 36% 71% 85%| «98% | = 8%. B(OH Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1%) 1% 1% 1% «12% 17% ~ 18%. ~ 20%| 86%) 44% 50% 60% 77% 97% Base Planned $ (this period) $2,580 $2,137 $2,137 | $10,337 | $27,417 $14,557 | $23,697 $25,557 $32,397 $16,076 $2,132 $0 | $0 $0 | ___Rev.1Planned$(this period) | ===N/A N/A _N/A — NA NAL N/A] $1,937 | _ $33,000 | __ $35,000 | $25,000 $25,330 | _ $0, g0/ ~—~*$01 Actual $ Expended (this period) $1,694 $0 $1,080 $0! $20,307 $9,513 ~ $1,937 $2,746. $23,434 $13,944 $11,012 $19,261 $33,336 $36,656 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,580 | $4,717 $6,854| $17,191 $44,608 $59,165 $82,862 | $108,419| $135,256| $167,653 $183,729| $185,861| $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 | -Rev.1Planned$(todatey) = | SONA sCNASs sCNVATLsCNAN N/A N/A| $34,531 $67,531 | $100,531 | $135,531 $160,531 | $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 | $185, ‘861 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,694 $1,694 $2,774 $2,774 $23,081| $32,594] $34,531 $37,277 $45,709| $69,143 $83,087 $94,099 | $113,360 $146,696 | $183,352 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861] $189,861 $189,861| $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861| $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | NANA ONAL CNA N/A wal N/A| N/A N/A NA ONAL S——s—C‘NATLs— NANA NAA Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861| $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $188,167 $188,167 | $187,087 | $187,087 $166,780 | $157,267 | $155,330 $152,584| $144,152| $120,718 $106,774 $95,762 $76,501 $43,165 $6,509 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 snares SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Regs Sot10 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT og-12-88 i 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 41ST QUARTER 1997 | 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 | ‘ASK MONTH| JUNWUL | AUG SEP oct NOV DEC JAN [ FEB. | MAR | APR | MAY JUN JUL AUG | SEP | TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 Actual % Work Completed 1%| 5% 12% 18% 24% 30% 33% 38% 40% 46%| 51% 55%| 60% 68% a Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 12% 22% 31% 41% 47% 51% 55% 60% 64% 69% 74% 79% 83% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(todate)) =====N/AA N/A) N/A N/A NAL CNA 33% 42%) = 49% 56% 62% 69% 75%, «81% 84% | Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A _NA| ZA N/A N/A NAl NASON 8%] 75% 81% 84% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Amend. #9 Planned % Cmp $ (to date)| NA N/A NAY _NA N/A _ NA — NANA N/A N/A. N/A NA| = =NA NA) CNA Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 6% 12% 18% 24%| 80% 33% 37% 42%! 4B%s—*~=<“i«é«‘i‘“|SC CHG 60% 67% 73% Base Planned $ (this period) $20,791 | $144,150] $199,209] $298,662 $295,087] $287,830| $181,342) $116,157] $116,001] $153,269 $147,528 $130,424 | $170,609 | $134,741] $119,445 ___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) [N/A NAL ONAL ONAL N/Al —sN/A|_~—« $120,608 $269,226 | $235,588 | $207,687 $182,530| $219,686 | $198,895 $196,470 | $87,794 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) N/A| NA N/A NA ON/AL N/A| N/A. WA té‘<“WNAYL’SCOt*téi‘“CSC#NAN”~O#*;*;*;*;*CWNAY!’«~OéC«@S20~018'| ~—$221,229 | $218,804 $87,794 Task 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A _Amend. #9 Planned $ (this period) | N/A NA; ONAL ONAL N/A NAL NA N/A N/A N/A N/A NAL N/A NA; ON/AA Actual $ Expended (this period) $27,949 | $142,820| $198,987| $163,015! $212,219| $178,481| $120,608 $119,443| $165,199] $131,611 $151,695 | $150,792] $149,769) $236,586 | _$183,7 Base Planned $ (to date) $20,791 | $164,941 | $364,150] $662,812 $957,899 | $1,245,729 | $1,427,071 | $1,543,228 | $1,659,229 | $1,812,498 | $1,960,026 | $2,090,450 | $2,261,059 | $2,395,800 | $2,515,245 | ‘Rev.1Planned$(todate) | N/A N/A; NAAT UNA CWNA_—sCNA_s« $1,044,079 | $1,313,305 | $1,548,893 | $1,756,580 | $1,939,110 | $2,158,796 | $2,357,691 | $2,554,161 | $2,641,955 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA = NA’~~—COWNAs~«~C«é«<(NAN N/A| $2,159,128 | $2,380,357 | $2,599,161 | $2,686,955 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A __ Amend. #9 Planned$(todatey) | N/A) __ NAL ONAL ONAL N/A N/A N/A N/A] N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A; CNA Actual $ Expended (to date) $27,949 | $170,769| $369,756 | $532,771 $744,990 | $923,471 | $1,044,079 $1,163,522 | $1,328,721 | $1,460,332 | $1,612,027 | $1,762,819 | $1,912,588 $2,149,174 | $2,332,948 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 __CWG Contract Amend. #4Budget | = = N/A = NA; —s NAA CNA N/A N/A| $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A “NAL COUNALt~“‘é‘é‘YA))~)™©))UNAL...UNAL.WOWO~UCUNZA~~~~~ ONAL. $45,000] $45,000. ~—«$45,000 $45,000 DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A __DFlContractAmend.#7Budget | = N/A, ON, SCNT CNA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A CNA _DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A N/A N/A NWA —”~—<C«~*(ALt“‘<‘ UUWNAALSO#OC*‘NAO!”OWUNAOW..).VUNAL.OUO~*~;«U&éNAC~‘“C‘;é(NALCO” N/A N/A N/A Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Contract Amend. #9 Budget N/A ‘NAL ONAL CNA N/A N/A N/A’ N/A| N/A N/A N/A NAL N/A NAL Total Project NTE Budget $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,146,469 $3,146,469 | $3,146,469 | $3,146,469 $3,146,469 | $3,191,469 | $3,191,469 | $3,191,469 | $3,191, Actual Remaining Project Budget | $3,015,474 | $2,872,654 | $2,673,667 | $2,510,652 | $2,298,433 | $2,119,952 | $2,102,390 | $1,982,947 | $1,817,748 | $1,686,137 | $1,534,442 | $1,428,650 | $1,278,881 | $1,042,295 | $858,521 BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $364,150 $881,579 $413,500 $431,221 $424,795 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS I $1,245,729 =| REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTAL $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $609,903 I $483,159 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 | REV. 1+DFI PLANNED QTR TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $610,235 $527,827 — Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED QTR TOTA $369,756 $553,715 $405,250 $434,098 $570,129 AMEND. #9 PLANNED QTR TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $405,250 $434,098 $570,129 IREV. 1+DFI PLANNED YRLY TOTALS| | $923,471 | Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED YRLY TOTALS | $923,471 | 4 f AMEND. #9 PLANNED YRLY TOTALS| | $923,471 | ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 | $405,250 $434,098 | $570,129 : ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS | $923,471 | Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 Page 6 of 10 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT Oelese | 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH] OCT | NOV ] DEC JAN | FEB MAR APR. | MAY JUN JUL | AUG SEP OCT | NOV DEC | 1 SCOPING ae , [ Actual % Work Completed 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 700%| 100% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%! 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| 100%, = 100%| += 100%] = 100% + = 100% +: 100%| + 100%, + 100%| 100% 100% 1009 ~ 100% 100%] = 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%} 100%! —: 1009 Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 0) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 ___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) | _ $o. =i $0} $0 _ $0 _ $0 $0 _ $0 |, $0 $0 $0 $0, $0} 800 Actual $ Expended (this period) _ $2,850 | $1,978 $0 $0 —$0-|— $o | $0, go; $0] $0 «$0 $0 -$0_ $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,050] $351,050] $351,050 $351,050] $351,050| $351,050. $351,050 $351,050 $351,050| $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $(todate) | _—-$374,839 $374,839 | $374,839] $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839 __ Actual $ Expended (to date) $372,861 $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839 $374,839 | _$374,839| $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839] $374,839 $374.8 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 | $351,050 | $351,050| $351,050 $351,050] $351,050] $351,050 $351,050] $351,050] $351,050 $351,050. $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 «$23,789 | ‘$23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 | $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget ~ $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,83 $374,839 $374,839| $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $1,978 | $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 INVENTORY | Actual % Work Completed 95% 97% 97% | 98% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1009 100%) 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)) 100% 100% _ 100% _ 100% 100%] 100%, 100% _ 100% 100% 100% = 100%) = 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 95% | 97% 97% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100%| —-: 100%. Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 > $0 $0 $0 $0 ___Rev.1 Planned $(thisperiod) | = $0) $0 | $0, 8 $0 ___ $0 ___ $0 _ so] $0, ss 80 $0 $0} «8 Actual $ Expended (this period) _ _ $61 $12,141 $3,406 $7,309 _$7453/ $3,459) $0 | S| $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706] $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 ____ Rev. 1Planned$(todate) ||: $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591| $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591| $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 | $679,591 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $644,933 | $657,074 | $657,956 | $661,362 | $668,671 $676,124] $679,583 $679,583 | $679,583] $679,583 $679,583 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706] $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660 706 | _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $18,885 $18,885. $18,885. $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885] $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 —$18,88: $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885. Total Task NTE Budget $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591| $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591| $679,591 | $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget $34,658 $22,517 $21,635 $18,229 | $10,920 $3,467 $8 $8 $8 $8 $8 | | 3 _ {IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION F | | Actual % Work Completed 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)} 100%, 100% 100% 100% 100%) 100%) = 100% = 100%! == 100% 100%, ———_—-100 | 100%, 100%} 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100%) 100 | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | __Rev. 1 Planned $(this period) | $8,993, $0 | $o} $0, 80 Sof 80, 0 80 $0 _$0/ si Actual $ Expended (this period) $59 $10,706 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 ~ $0 | $0 $0 | s0| Base Planned $ (to date) $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010] $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010| $584,010 $584,010] $584,010| $584,010 | $584,01 $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 ____Rev. 1 Planned $(todate) _— |: $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 | _ $606, 612 | __ $606,612 $606,612 | __ $606,612 | $606,612 Actual $ Expended (to date) $595,834 $606,540| $606,540| $606,540 $606,540] $606540| $606,540 $606,540| $606,540| $606,540 $606,540 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010[ $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010| $584,010 $584,010| $584,010] $584,010 $584,01 $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602| $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | __ $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 | $22,602 | $2260 __ $22,602 $22,602 | __ $22,602 | Total Task NTE Budget $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612| $606,612 $606,612) $606,612| $606,612 $606,612| $606,612] $606,612 | $606,612. $606,612 $606,612| $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $10,778 | $72 $72 $72 $72 $72 $72 | $72 $72 $72 $7 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Page 7 of 10 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT ee 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH JAN | FEB | MAR APR | MAY oct DEC 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION | | Actual % Work Completed 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%) 1002 Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% | 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%. 100%, 100% 100%| Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(to date)| 100%, = 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%) 1009 100%! = 100%| = 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 93%. 100% 100% 100% 100%] 100% ~~~ 100%| +=: 100%| 100% 100% | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 | Rev.1Planned$(thisperiod) | | $0, $0] $0 $0 $o{ ss $0 $0. $0 go; ss $ I So LT) $0 | U1) i $0 |___ Actual $ Expended (this period) $141,782 | $24,482 So eo so eo Lisa isol ii golf | | so. $0 $0 $0 $0 | Base Planned $ (to date) $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475| $303,475 $303,475| $303,475| $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 | ___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) |__$336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 _ $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $311,833 | $336,315 | $336,315| $336,315 $336,315 | $336,315| $336,315 $336,315 | $336,315| $336,315 $336,315 | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475] $303,475 $303,475| $303,475| $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $32,866 —$32,866| $32,866 | $32,866) —_ $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 _ $32,866 | $32,866 | $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341| $336,341 | $336,941 | $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 | Actual Remaining Task Budget $24,508 | $26 $26 | $26 $26 $26 5 EVAL PREPARATION Actual % Work Completed 30% 58% 84% 88% 92% 92% 85% | 93% 97% 97% 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 50% 55% 60% 66% | 85% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| 59%) 66% 73% 85% 92% 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100% 100%. ~ 100% «100% =: 100% Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) 62% | 64%, = 74%! ~=S (ti %.~—ti“‘ésL«O#*#*#*#«édOM%~SCC(ié«‘d100%_-=Ss—“‘<‘é‘LOONL~«O©€«*«dTOM%|~«C*=“‘éLOO 100% 100% 100% 100% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A 85% 92% 96% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% Amend. #9 Planned % Cmp $ § (to date)| NA N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 96% «8% 100%) = 100%) 100%| | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 31% 56% ~~ BBG CB7%—Ssi(“‘ésOCO#*#*#*#*#*«CRL 85% tCtC“‘«é‘“_OL«C*é‘(#OOT%=«i;CO#*‘#COOG% 99% Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 | $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $42,570 $18,742 | $0 $0 $0 $0 T $0_ $0 $0 _Rev. 1 Planned $(this period) | $66,200) $29,000 $29,000| $49,900, $28,000 $30,001 $1,904 | $0 $0 a ee TUDO se LEE Eee 1 | ~ $0 | ~ Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) $69,702 $67,700| $56,187 $62,900 $39,500; $40,502] ~ $1,904 | LILO) 1 Souls 11 i$so | $0 $0 $0 $0 | Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A] $124,294 $50,000 $32,128 $15,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 __ Amend. #9 Planned $ (this period) _| NAL NAL ONAL ONC, SCAT NACA —CNAT_s$.21,502) $15,000 Dior 1) 11 | fee) Actual $ Expended (this period) $39,324 $168,703| $149,939 $22,158 $26,430| $4,377| $124,294 $59,329| $31,676 | $21,502 $22,684 i} | Base Planned $ (to date) $199,978 | $221,548 | $241,118 | $266,688 $341,258| $383,828| $402,570. $402,570| $402,570] $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 ____Rev.1Planned$(todate) | $239,669 | $268,669| $297,669| $347,569 | $375,569 7.474 $407,474 | $407,474 | $407,474 | _ $407,474 | $407,474 | __ $407,474 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) $288,171 $355,871| $412,058] $474,958 $514,458 | $556,864 $556,864 | $556,864| $556,864 $556,864 $556,864 $556,864 | $556,864 | Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A. N/A N/A N/A N/A $638,887 $688,887 $721,015 $736,015 $751,015 $751,015 | $751,015 $751,015 __Amend. #9 Planned $(todate) [| N/A. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A) N/A N/A| $751,394 $766,394 _ $782,941 | $782,941 | _ $782,941 Actual $ Expended (to date) $142,986 | $311,689| $461,628 | $483,786 $510,216| $514,593| $638,887 $698,216| $729,892] $751,394 $774,07: | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 | $402,570 | $402,570| $402,570 $402,570] $402,570] $402,570 $402,570| $402,570] $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 | DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget _ $45,000 $45,000] $45,000] $45,000| $45,000; $45,000] $45,000| $45,000| $45,000] $45,000 $45,000. ~ $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 ‘$11,400 $11,400 DF Contract Amend. #7 Budget | —- $3,502, == $3,502 | = $3,502 DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A| $89,487 | $89,487 | | Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A: N/A N/A Contract Amend. #9 Budget |. N/A N/A| NA sk NTE B $467,376 $556,864 | $556,864 Total Task NTE Budget Actual Remaining Task Budget $324,390 $245,175 $95,236 $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 $3, 502 $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 | $3,502 $89,487 | $89,487 | $89,487 $194,152 $194,152 | $194,152 $31,926 | $31,926 | $31,926 | $89,487 $89,487 $09,487 | $89,487 | _ $89,487 $89,487 | __ $89,487 $89,487 N/A, N/A NA| $194,152 $194,152 | $194,152| $194,152 | $194,152 NA ONIA N/A NWA NAL CAAT $31,926 | $31,926 $556,864 $556,864 | $556,864 | $751,015 | $751,015 | $751,015 | $782,941 | $782,941 $31,547 ___—:$8,863 $73,078 $46,648 $42,271 $112,128 | $52,799 $21,123 _ $782, 941 | $782,941 $782,941 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFl Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Rage 8.0119 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT oeiee8 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH| OCT FEB MAR DEC 6 ANILCA APPLICATION LC | i Actual % Work Completed 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 20%] 0% 0% 45% 45% 46%: Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 16% 26% 50% 60%. 749 94% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $(todate)}/ =» 0%~=Si(sCi%]SC(“(tstSC 0% 0%| 17% = 40%) 53% 73% 86% | 909 96% = B%| =: 100% Task 5&6 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A “NAL COUNAt~*~*«SNAC N/A| 0% 9% 47%| 84% 1009 100% ~ 100% 100% Amend. #9 Planned % Cmp $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A 45% 639 100%) 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 21% 0%) 0% 43% 45% | 469 | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $39,100 | $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 | $35,100 $24,600 | $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 $42,900 $55,563 | $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $6,660 $6,163 $3,860 Task 5&6 Reall Planned $ (this period)| = =o N/A N/A) ONAL NAA ONAN CNAA|_s($51,535) $5,000 $20,000 $20,000 $8,466 $0, 0] 8 Amend. #9 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A __NA NA; NA N/A| NA| $926 | __ $10,000 $9,526 | $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,176 | $345 $0 $0 $0 $40,573 ($51,535)| $0 $23,014 $926 $695 __BasePlanned$(todatey) [ss S0,-——“‘ m|élT!!USOLCUOSCSC*~‘“‘é‘ CYS $o[ $39,100 | $64,200 | $123,800 $148,900 | _ $184,000 $233,200 | $247,616 | $247,616 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 ~$0| $42,900] $98,463 $132,163) $180,229] $214,033 $222,233 $237,593 | $243,756 | $247,616 Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 | $5,000 $25,000 $45,000 | $53,466 $53,466 | $53,466 $53,466 Contract Amend. #9 Planned $ (to date) NA ONAL CNA NAL ONAL N/A N/A N/A N/A| $23,940 | $33,940 _ $53,466 | $53,466 | ‘$53,466 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,617 $10,962 $10,962 | $10,962 $10,962| $51535] $0 $0/ + $23,014| $23,940 $24,635 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247.61 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | N/A N/A) NAY CNA NA N/A — NA NAL NAA NANA NAL _ NA) N/A Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A. N/A N/A N/A — N/AL—s«SNVAT_ ($194,150) ($194,150)| ($194,150)| ($194,150) ($194,150). ($194,150)| ($194,150)| ($194,150) Contract Amend. #9 Budget N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A $0 | $0. $0 $0 $0 Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $53,466 | $53,466 $53,466 | $53,466 $53,466 $53,466 | $53,466 | $53,466 Actual Remaining Task Budget | $236,999 $236,654 | $236,654| $236,654 $236,654| $196,081| $53,466 in $53,466 | $30,452 | $29,526 $28,831 | 7 STUDIES | | | Actual % Work Completed | 85% = 85%] = 85%] 100%]: 100% 100%|_ 100%| eT Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 91% 91% 91% 91% 96% (i %.—i(i‘éiC LC 96% 100% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 90% 90% 90% 90% 96%| 96% | 96% 96% 100% | 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 82% 83% 84% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $5,400 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,900 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $9,415 | $403 $1,103 $12,550 | $3,887 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | Base Planned $ (to date) $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $97,480 $97,480 | $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 | $97,480. $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 | $97,48 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 Actual $ Expended (to date) $83,533 $83,936 $85,039 $97,589 | $101,476 | $101,476 | $101,476 | $101,476 | $101,476 | $101,476 | $101,476 | |___ Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480] $101,480 $101,480] $101,480| $101,480 $101,480] $101,480] $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 |__CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A) N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480| $101,480] $101,480) $101,480| $101,480| $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 | $101,480. Actual Remaining Task Budget | $17,947 $17,544| $16,441| $3,891) gah SAStS~=«S $4 | $4 T Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 Page 9 of 10 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 09-12-98 4TH QUARTER 1997 4ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 MONTH] OCT af NOV. DEC FEB MAR APR | MAY | _JUN AUG NOV. DEC ENGINEERING FIELD WORK | ; Actual % Work Completed 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%: | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%. 100% | 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)} 100% 100%} 100% 100% 100%) =~ 100%) = 100%, 100%) 100%) 100% __—-100 100% 100%} 100% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) 97% | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100 Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | __ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) ___ $0 J BON LIL feo. | LL $0; _— $0 $o| «$50 $0 LT. $0. Tsou ori | || 1 $05) | Actual $ Expended (this period) _ $6,523 | $5,421 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 » $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 _Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) __ $202,655 | _ $202,655 | | _ $202,655 | __ $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | _$202,65: $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) 189 $202,610 | $202,610 $202,610 | $202,610| $202,610 $202,610 $202,61 _| Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 | $202,655] $202,655| $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655] $202,655 $202,655 $202, 655 $202, 655 $202,655. $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | = N/A NAL NAAT N/A| N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A NWA NA NA ONAL NA Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 | $202,655| $202,655| $202,655 $202,.655| $202,655] $202,655 $202,655| $202,655| $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $5,466 | $45 $45 | $45 $45 $45 | $45 | | PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING | | | Actual % Work Completed 99% | 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 1009 Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98%) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98: | 98 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| 98%) = 98%] == 98% = 98% 98% 98%) 98% 100%) 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 99% | 99% 99% 99% 400%! =< 100%] +=‘ 100% | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 ___ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) | ___ $0, Le $0; si $0 _ $0 ee $4,000) $0) 80 Actual $ Expended (this period) _ $3,909 | $1,058 $165 $381 | $987 $0 $0 | $0 | $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 | $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 | $185,86 $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861. Actual $ Expended (to date) $187,261 | $188,319| $188,484| $188,865 $189,852| $189,852| $189,852 $189,852| $189,852 $189,852 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 | $189, 861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget NAL NA NAL NA, N/A “NAL ONAL N/A| NA; NA NA NAL N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861| $189,861] $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $2,600 | $1,542 $1,377 $996 $9 $9 $9 | $9 $9 $9 $9 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 9/18/98 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: Page 10 of 10 PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT oe 220 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 fee 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH| OCT NOV DEC JAN | _FEB MAR APR | MAY JUN JUL |. _AUG sep [| oct. | DEC TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 3 Actual % Work Completed 80% 85% 90% 90% 91% 93% 95% 97% 98% 98% 999 Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 85% 85% 86% 87%) 89% 91% 93% 94% 96% 96% 989 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date)| 86% (87%| 88% 90% 91% 93% 95% 96% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100% Rev.1+DFI Planned % Cmp $ (to date) 86% + 86% 88%! (0% 91%! = 98%! = (asi %.——“‘(<‘éC«CCCN!:CO*#*#;#«CBG*idCS 99% 100% 100% 100% Task 586 Reall Planned % Cmp $ (to dat N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 95% 97% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100% Amend. #9 Planned % Cmp $ (to date)| “NAL ONAL CONAN N/A] NA; N/A N/A N/A 98%. — 100% 100%] =: 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 79% 84% 89% 90% 91% 93%| 95% «97% 98%] 98%, | Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $47,970 $57,842 $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 $35,100 $28,600 $14,416 $0 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) __ $75,193 | $29,000| $29,000 $49,900 $28,000| $78,801] $57,467 | —_— $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $10,660, $6,163 $3,860 Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (this period) | $78,695 ‘$67,700 $56,187 $62,900 $39,500 | $89,302 $57,467 $33,700| $48,065] $33,804 $8,200. ~ $10,660 $6,163 | $3,860 Task 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| $76,218 $55,000 $52,128 $35,000 $23,466 | $0 | $0 $0 _ Amend. #9 Planned $(thisperiod) [| == NAL SONAL SCAT SONA CNA N/A N/A| N/A N/A| $22,428 | $25,000 $9,526 $0] ——_—$0| Actual $ Expended (this period) $214,099 | $225,237 | $152,089 $38,495 $38,613 | $52,403 $76,218 $59,329| $54,690] $22,428 $23,379 $0, $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,579,815 | $2,601,385 | $2,620,955 | $2,646,525 | $2,721,095 | $2,769,065 | $2,826,907 | $2,852,007 | $2,911,607 | $2,936,707 | $2,971,807 $3,029,007 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 __ Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $2,717,148 | $2,746,148 | $2,775,148 | $2,825,048 | $2,853,048 | $2,931,849 | $2,989,317 | $3,023,017 | $3,071,082 | $3,104,886 | $3,113,086 $3,136,446 $3,142,609 | $3,146,469 ~ Rev. 1 + DFI Planned $ (to date) _| $2,765,650 | $2,833,350 | $2,889,537 | $2,952,437 | $2,991,937 | $3,081,239 | $3,198,707 | $3,172,407 | $3,220,472 | $3,254,276 | $3,262,476 $3,285,836 | $3,291,999 | $3,295,859 | Tasks 5&6 Reall. Planned $ (to date) N/A’ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A] $3,130,102 | $3,185,102 | $3,237,230 | $3,272,230 $3,295,860 - $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 Amend. #9 Planned $ (to date) _| NA NAAL NAL NA ONAL —CNA CNA N/A N/A| $3,266,549 | $3,291,549 $3,327,786 | $3,327,786 | $3,327,786 ‘Actual $ Expended (to date) $2,547,047 | $2,772,284 | $2,924,373 | $2,962,868 $3,001,481 | $3,053,884 | $3,130,102 | $3,189,431 | $3,244,121 | $3,266,549 | $3,289,928 ani Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 _ CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047| $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047| $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047] $103,047 $103,047. $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047, DFI Contract Amend. #5 Budget $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 | $45,000 $45,000. $45,000| $45,000] $45,000] $45,000. $45,000 ~ $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 DFI Contract Amend. #6 Budget $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 | $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 __DFl Contract Amend. #7.Budget | $3,502 —$3,502| $3,502| $3,502, —_—‘ $3,502 $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502 | $3,502 $3,502 $3,502 | $3,502. DFI Contract Amend. #8 Budget N/A| $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 $89,487| $89,487] $89,487| $89,487| $89,487| $89,487 $89,487 $89,487 Tasks 5&6 Reallocation Budget N/A. N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A $0 | $0 $0 $0 | $0 | $0 ____ContractAmend.#9 Budget | NMA NAA NAA NANA N/A __ NAL N/A N/A $31,926 | , $31,926 $31,926 | $31,926, Total Project NTE Budget $3,206,371 $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,859 | $3,295,860 | | $3,295,860 | $3,295,860 | $3,327,786 $3,327,78 $3,327,786 | $3,327,786 | $3,327,786 Actual Remaining Project Budget $659,324 | $523,575 | $371,486] $332,991 | $294,378 | $241,975| $165,758 $106,429 $51,739 $61,237 $37 ,85 ar BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $105,710 $148,110 | $142,542 $88,800 $43,016 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,375,226 [$422,468 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $133,193 $156,701 | $139,233 $54,704 $20,683 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,851,677 $371,321 [ REV. 1+DFI PLANNED QTR TOTALS $202,582 $191,702 $139,233 $54,704 $20,683 Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED QTR TOTAL $591,425 $129,511 $179,712 $62,089 $0 [ AMEND. #9 PLANNED QTR TOTALS $591,425 $129,511 $190,237 $73,975 $9,526 | JREV. 1+DFI PLANNED YRLY TOTALS| | $1,966,066 $406,322 | Task 5&6 Reall. PLANNED YRLY TOTAL | $2,000,902 $371,312 AMEND. #9 PLANNED YRLY TOTALS| | $2,000,902 $403,249 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $591,425 $129,511 $190,237 $60,030 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS | $2,000,902 $379,778 Rev 1 1/1/97 includes Contract Amend #4. 6/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #5 in Task 5. 10/1/97 the DFI Contract Amend #6 #7 in Task 5. 11/17/97 the DFI Contract Amend #8 in Task 5. 4/17/98 Tasks 5 6 Reallocation. 7/15/98 Contract Amend. #9 in Task 5 " Contract No. 95-208 Amendment No. 10 CONTRACT AMENDMENT Purpose: To amend that certain Contract No. 95-208 between The Intertie Participants Group (IPG), Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (Chugach), and Power Engineers, Inc. (Consultant) to provide additional services and funding, and to extend the performance period under the Route Selection Services - Anchorage to Kenai Transmission Facilities Contract. AMENDMENT In accordance with the provisions of SECTION 10, REVISIONS, of the subject Contract, both parties being in agreement, the Contract terms and conditions are modified as follows: SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES Add an ninth paragraph to this Section as follows: The Consultant shall provide further services primarily of support to RUS and USFWS during the EIS preparation and review periods and is described in Power Engineer’s attached letter dated 7/22/98. This amendment should be further identified as Phase IC “EIS Support” of the project. SECTION 2. COMPENSATION Add a ninth paragraph as follows: Costs for the Work described in the ninth paragraph above are not to exceed $678,069.00. Reference the Power Engineers letter dated July 22, 1998, attached hereto. The additional funds should be allocated as Task #33, Environmental Studies, $410,390 (PEI Work Items 1, 3, 4, and 9), and Task #35, Public and Agency Involvement, $267,679 (PEI Work Items 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8). SECTION 4. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE AND SCHEDULE Delete the first sentence of the first paragraph of this Section in its entirety and in lieu thereof replace with the following: The term of this Contract is November 16, 1995 thorough May 31, 2000. Add a fourth paragraph to this Section as follows: The Work required by this Amendment shall be effective no sooner than September 1, 1998. C:9520810.AMD July 30, 1998 Contract No. 95-208 Amendment No. 10 All other terms and conditions of the basic Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Dated this__30th___ day of__July__, 1998. FOR: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. solely as agent for Alaska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc., the Municipality of Anchorage, d/b/a Municipal Light & Power, Chugach Electric Association, Inc., the Municipality of Fairbanks, d/b/a Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System, Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc., the City of Seward, d/b/a Seward Electric System, the Homer Electric Association, Inc., and the Matanuska Electric Association, Inc., “Participating Utilities” and represented by the Intertie Participants Group (IPG) wy, Kar Btn Zetbeck pare, £-4-%8 Randall L. Pollock - Sr. Vice President C:9520810.AMD July 30, 1998 Eos nyniss RECEIVE Fy 27 Dora L. Gropp, P.E. JUL 1998 Manager, Transmission & Special Projects TRANSM Chugach Electric Association, Inc. SPECIAL Sa 5601 Minnesota Drive, Bldg. A Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: 120376-05 Souther Intertie, Phase IB - Chugach Contract #95-208 POWER Project 120376 - Revised Work Scope and Budget for EIS Support Dear Ms. Gropp, As you requested, we have reviewed the work scope and budget for the DEIS/EIS phase of the Project, based on the schedule discussed with agencies at our recent meetings on June 23- 25, 1998. The budget and work scope included with my letter of May 26, 1998 was based on a 16 month schedule. The schedule agreed upon with the agencies at the recent meeting extends this time to 21 months. Given this increase in the overall schedule, discussions and interaction between all of the parties working on the Project will take place over a more extended period of time. Accordingly, we have adjusted the budget to account for the additional effort that may be required. Changes from the May 26, 1998 budget estimate are as follows: POWER Engineers With the increase in schedule from 16 to 21 months, discussions and interaction on the Project will continue for a longer period. The budget and work scope for Work Item 1 — Technical Support for DEIS/EIS, Work Item 8 — Schedule Administration, and Work Item 9 — Project Management have been increased to allow for the work continuing for a longer time period. Also, one trip has been added to the Project Management budget. Work Items 2 through 7 remain unchanged. Dames & Moore Based on the discussions with the agencies at the June 23 — 25 meetings and since that time, additional costs are estimated for Work Item 1, Technical/ Environmental Support in response to anticipated requests for biological data requests, and GIS mapping and graphics from Mangi and Fish and Wildlife Service. Additional costs for work items 2-8 account for the additional 5 months of scheduled time and the anticipated ongoing interaction with the agencies and project team, including project reporting and coordination activities. DEN 26-489 (7/22/98) ukk POWER Engineers, Incorporated a 3900 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 700 Phone (303) 716-8900 Lakewood, CO 80235 Fax (303) 716-8980 Chugach Electric Association, Inc. July 22, 1998 Page 2 A revised budget for the DEIS/EIS support activities is attached. After you have had the opportunity to review these materials, | will call you to see if further clarification or discussion is needed. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. OT Fb kek __ Randy Pollock, P.E. Sr. Project Manager RP/ukk Enclosures cc: Mike Walbert (PEI) Tim Tetherow (D&M) File: 120376-05-55-00-30 DEN 26-489 (7/22/98) ukk G20 2 Seam BRAEN Southern Intertie Project Proposed Budget for DEIS/EIS Support Revision 1 - July 22, 1998 Work Item} Work Item Description | PowerEngineers | | PowerEngineers | Dames and Moore Totals [Labor [Expenses] Subtotal | Labor [Epenses] U8 | 2% | Sublotal| | geonnicalenvronmental | $42,509 | $5,500 $48,099]| $87,549] $20,275| $107,824 | $2,156] $109,981] $158,080] — | ___2___|Public Involvement $1,667] _$100| —_$1,767]/_ $39,957] $14,090] $54,047| $1,081] $55,128]| $56,895] 3 fee [sins -—4__{FEIS Support | a [sol sala el mel LS _jMaling ist_| | sof SO] SO $17,075] $2,400] $19,175] $383] $19,558] mee 558 | 7 _[PublicHearings $16,114] $5,125] $21,239) |_ $66,136] — |__8 [Schedule Administration || $7,051 $300] — $7361] —$28,069| 33.308 at a5 - $629 532 085 $39,437 |__9___|Project Management___| sa7.084 $17,180 Bisa —_sol_—_s0]_sol_—_s0] _sob it4204|- | fTotalBudget_ | $315,678] $129,055] $444,733] $8,895] $453,628] Notes: 1. This budget is for the 21 month period from September 1998 to May 1999, coincident with the projected 21 month period agreed upon at the June 23-25, 1998 agency meetings in Anchorage. 2. The Project Management budget includes 7 trips for quarterly Project review and coordination meetings. 3. Any trips for Power Engineers required under Work Item 2 - Public Involvement would be combined with one of the 7 Project Management review and coordination trips. 3. See Work Item descriptions for an explanation of the work proposed for each item. 4. The overall scope of work required to be completed by Power Engineers and Dames & Moore cannot be precisely known at this time. This proposed budget is based on the Applicant (IPG) responsibilities as outlined in the MOU, and the scope of work required from Power Engineers and Dames & Moore will depend on the demands of the agencies and IPG throughout the DEIS/EIS process. Accordingly, this proposed budget is only an estimate. More or less effort, and consequently adjustments to this budget and the associated scope of work may be appropriate as a result of changes in the Project schedule or work scope. DEN 26-490 (7/22/98) DEIS/EIS Support UWA FAW CHUGACH ELectRIC 777%" ASSOCIATION, INC. RECEIVED AUG 10 1998 DIVISION OF REAL August 7, 1998 US. FISH & WILDLIFE SenVics Ms. Sharon N. Janis gy Chief, Division of Realty U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 1011 E. Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6199 Re: Southern Intertie Project - Collection Agreement Right of Way Permit Processing Dear Ms. Janis: Chugach has reviewed the attached revised schedule dated 6/23/98 and the Financial Plan dated 4/29/98, and finds them acceptable. Also attached is your reply letter RE/2241.BA, as well as Dora Gropp’s fax dated 7/20/98 detailing the additional costs and previous payments. Please route this document for Fish and Wildlife Service signatures and return the original to my office at your earliest convenience. After Chugach signature, a fully executed copy will be Teturned to you for your files. Should you have question, please contact me at 762-4783. Sincerely, CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Robert E. Martin Manager, Administrative Services ‘ar L:C:971931 Attachments 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 ¢ FAX 907-562-0027 This document constitutes an amendment to the Collection Agreement between Chugach Electric Association, Inc. and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and consists of the revised Schedule dated 6/23/98, the Financial Plan dated 4/29/98, U. S. Fish & Wildlife Reply letter RE/2241.BA, and Dora Gropp’s fax dated 7/20/98. In witness thereof, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date of the last signature. For the Fish and Wildlife Service: For the COOPERATOR: AG I! 1998 NB Tla Acting Regional Director Date gel Chugéch Electric Association, Construction Manager, solely as agent for Alaska Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc., the Municipality of Anchorage d/b/a Municipal Light and Power, Chugach Electric Association, Inc., the Municipality of Fairbanks d/b/a Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System, Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc., the City of Seward d/b/a Seward Electric System, the Homer Electric Association, Inc., and the Matanuska Electric Association, Inc., “Participating Utilities” and represented by the Intertie Participants Group (IPG). August 7, 1998 De Southern Intertie Project TACT EA-UIE & aA AH 3 gis | oH : | is EA RWTAREIIEI-CAT HIN RECA fed ted Ed eau Tae HO BY aE dil ZBu< | | | S838 22 TTA Hie ! Phitih | 322 I iE ‘Theil ier Wile] $33 | : sl 3 al; i‘ B28 iL Ie atte Pa HP Hine BLS MvaDalt geil a al GLUCAN WI oibsshl aide June 23, 1998 File Name: St$sched.xis Financial Plan Southern Intertie Environmental Analysis/ Right-of-way Permit Processing US. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 7 - Alaska Revised April 29, 1998 Item/Activi c, 1. Cooperative agreement preparation/review Wildlife Biologist (16 hrs.) $ 609.00 2. Inter-agency coordination meetings (10 meetings) Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (40 hrs.) $1,525.00 Fish and Wildlife Biologist (Refuge) (20 hrs.) 702.00 Refuge Manager (8 hrs.) 355.00 3. Scoping Report review Wildlife Biologist (16 hrs.) $ 609.00 4. Travel Related Costs Alaska coordination meetings Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (4 trips) Travel and Per diem $ 328.00 Fish and Wildlife Biologist (Refuge) (4 trips) Travel and Per diem $ 958.00 Public hearing - Washington, D.C. Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (32 hrs.) 1,220.00 Travel and Per diem 1,300.00 Refuge Manger (32 hrs.) 1,420.00 Travel and Per diem 1,300.00 Item/Activi 5. EVAL review/technical assistance Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (200 hrs.) $7,600.00 Fish and Wildlife Biologists (Refuge) (149 hrs.) 5,130.00 Ecologist (8 hrs.) 240.00 Fire management specialist (8 hrs.) 194.00 Forester (12 hrs.) 340.00 Park Ranger (40 hrs.) 1,350.00 6. NEPA document preparation/review: Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (40 hrs.) $1,525.00 Fish and Wildlife Biologists (Refuge) (98 hrs.) 3,284.00 Fire management specialist (6 hrs.) 146.00 Forester (6 hrs.) 170.00 Park Ranger (24 hrs.) 816.00 7. ROW application processing: ROW application fee $1,000.00 Compatibility determination Fish and Wildlife Biologists (Refuge) (64 hrs.) 2,357.00 Refuge Manager (16 hrs.) 710.00 Subsistence evaluation Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (16 hrs.) 610.00 Cultural resources evaluation Archaeologist (64 hrs.) 2,816.00 Economics review Economist (16 hrs.) 940.00 Engineering review Civil Engineer (64 hrs.) 2,972.00 Appraisal review Review Appraiser (8 hrs.) 338.00 Permit preparation Realty Specialist (80 hrs.) 2,242.00 Record of Decision Wildlife Biologist (Realty) (16 hrs.) 610.00 Automation, reproduction, etc. ___ 200.00 Total $45,916.00 Less deposit S$ 6,800.00 Balance Due $39,116.00 August 25, 1998 - OriGineti AX mat Post-it® Fax Note 7671 Lawrence R. Wolfe Senior Environmental Specialist Engineering & Environmental Staff U. S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Mail Stop 1571, Room 2242 Washington, DC 20250-1571 RE: Southern Intertie Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Wolfe: This letter serves as your authorization to amend RUS contract DACW69-97-D-0013 with the Mangi Environmental Group to secure their services for the referenced work. Said work to be performed in accordance with your letter of August 18, 1998 to Dora Gropp, and incorporating the August 5, 1998 Mangi Statement of Work. An invoice for an amendment amount of $97,670.00 is requested at your earliest convenience. This phase of the project and the Mangi effort has an expected completion date of September 30, 1999. If there are questions, please contact Dora Gropp (telephone 907-762-4626/fax 907-762-4617) or me at (907-762-4783/fax 907-762-4699). Sincerely, CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Robert E. Martin Manager, Administrative Services REM:rij 98-131 5601 Minnesota Drive e P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 © FAX 907-562-0027 AUG, -18" 98 (TUE) 14:04 P. 002 . US United States Department of Agricutture Rural Development Rural Business~Cooperative Service = Rural Housing Service » Aural Utilities Service Washington, DC 20250 August 18, 1998 Ms, Dora L. Gropp Manager, Transmission & Special Projects Chugach Electric Association, Inc, P.O. Box 196300 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Dear Ms. Gropp: This letter is in response to your fax dated July 20, 1998, concerning the second Statement of Work (SOW) for the Southern Intertie Project. This SOW tasks Mangi Environmental Group, Inc. with preparing the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and participating in public hearings that are mandated by ANILCA. The cost of this effort has been estimated at $94,825. The Corps of Engineers (COE) contracting costs would add another $2,845 for a total cost of $97,670. This total is $340 higher than your estimate primarily due to a change in the formula for calculating Other Direct Costs. Also note that the travel estimate has been adjusted to accommodate ANILCA hearings in both Anchorage and Soldotna. Based on our telephone conversation of August 4, 1998, you stated that you would prefer to wait until after the September 8-10 meetings before proceeding with this SOW. Be advised that it will take between 4 to 6 weeks from the time we notify the COE to proceed with our SOW until Mangi is officially awarded the contract, Even if additional work is still required to complete the Environmental Analysis (EVAL) in order to resolve U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concerns, certain sections of the DEIS could be completed without a final EVAL. The Outline, Table of Contents, Chapter 1, and parts of Chapters 2 and 3 should be unaffected by further changes to the EVAL. Therefore, I believe that the COE should notified no later than August 20 if you expect Mangi to be under contract before the end of September. Rural Development is Opportunity Lender creme a erpep lye. Gecrmtary of Agricuaure, Washingion, DC 20250 AUG. -18° 98 (TUE) 14:04 P. 003 - Ms. Dora L. Gropp > If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (202) 720-5093. Sincerely, Pm R. WOLFE ia Senior Environmental Specialist Engineering and Environmental Staff Enclosures DRAFT August 5, 1998 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MANGI ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. STATEMENT OF WORK NO. 2 1.0 BACKGROUND Seven electric utilities, collectively known as the Intertie Participants Group (IPG), are proposing to construct an electric transmission line from a location on the Kenai Peninsula to a location in or near Anchorage within the State of Alaska called the Souther Intertie Project. Several alternative locations for each terminal are being considered, as well as two distinctly different alternative routes ranging in length from approximately 60 miles to 90 miles. Two IPG utilities, the Golden Valley Electric Association, and the Homer Electric Association, are Rural Utilities Service (RUS) borrowers. These two borrowers may apply to RUS for financing assistance for there combined 28 percent share of the proposed project. The IPG will file an application for a right-of-way through the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Because both actions are considered Federal actions, RUS is serving as the Lead Agency and the FWS is serving as a Cooperating Agency for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed action, as announced in the Federal Register on October 9, 1996. The IPG, and their consultant team, conducted macro corridor and alternative evaluation studies to identify feasible and suitable project alternatives. Additional studies verified and quantified the resources that occur within the study area and then predicted the impact that project alternatives involving transmission line construction would have on these resources. These studies are reported in an Environmental Analysis (EVAL) that has been prepared by the IPG. The EVAL, upon acceptance by RUS and the FWS, will provide the basis for the preparation of the EIS in accordance with 7 CFR Section 1794.53 of RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The overall objective is to prepare an EIS for this project that is consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations (40 CFR Part 1500) and RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures (7 CFR Part 1794). DRAFT August 5, 1998 | The objective of this task is for the contractor to: e Prepare a Draft EIS for RUS as outlined in Section 3.0; and e Assist RUS in public hearings conducted by the FWS. 3.0 SCOPE The final scope of the Draft EIS will be based upon the significant issues identified during the scoping process. The content of the Draft EIS will be derived from information contained in the EVAL and other appropriate information. The RUS contractor shall work closely with the Contracting Officer’s Representative and Administrative Staff to ensure the intent of NEPA is fulfilled. 4.0 . REQUIREMENTS 4.1 GENERAL To accomplish the objective of this task, the contractor shall: e Using information contained in the EVAL and from any other appropriate sources, as necessary, prepare a Draft EIS that is consistent with NEPA and 40 CFR Part 1500; e Provide RUS with quality assurance and verification of the document’s contents, analyses and conclusions; e Provide a similar quality assurance concerning the adequacy of the overall NEPA process, including public involvement. The RUS contractor shall ensure that sufficient documentation and analyses are performed to satisfy NEPA and the requirements of the statutes and regulations listed in 7 CFR Part 1794. The RUS contractor shall provide the necessary personnel, services, materials, equipment, and facilities to carry out the specific task requirements as set forth below. Upon completion of this delivery order, the RUS contractor shall surrender to RUS complete copies of all electronic files developed for any component of the Draft EIS and any item purchased by the contractor for this project and paid for through this contract. DRAFT August 5, 1998 4.2. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 4.2.1 PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS shall be prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulations and Subpart F of RUS Environmental Policies and Procedures. In preparing the analysis, the RUS contractor will follow any standards and use any analytical methodologies approved by the RUS. The format of the Draft EIS is outlined in Section 4.2.1.1. The RUS contractor shall submit to RUS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), a Draft EIS outline, including section and subsection titles, and a preliminary table of contents. The Government shall provide review comment to the contractor. The contractor shall incorporate the comments and submit one copy of the final outline to the RUS and the cooperating agencies. The RUS contractor shall prepare and submit for RUS and FWS review, the Draft EIS chapters on a schedule outlined in Section 7.0. Chapter 2 shall be prepared in two parts. Part 1 shall include a description of the alternatives considered and the alternatives evaluated. Part 2 shall include the comparison of the environmental impacts of the alternatives evaluated in detail as well as their cost/benefit and engineering feasibility comparisons. Other parts of the Draft EIS that shall be prepared by the RUS contractor include a cover sheet, executive summary, list of acronyms and abbreviations, references cited and an index. RUS and FWS review of the initial draft chapters will be completed and comments provided to the RUS contractor within 10 working days of receipt of the last deliverable. Comments on individual chapters will be submitted to the RUS contractor as soon as they are available. Following the incorporation of RUS and FWS comments on the initial draft chapters and within 10 working day of receiving RUS and FWS comments on the complete set of initial Draft EIS deliverables, the contractor shall prepare and upon RUS approval submit the preliminary Draft EIS to RUS, the FWS, and IPG for review and comment. The preliminary Draft EIS shall resemble, as closely as possible in both quality and content, the Draft EIS. The preliminary Draft EIS shall not be used to obtain initial comments and concerns of other regulatory agencies directly interested in the proposal, rather, their comments and concerns will be incorporated in the Final EIS along with the Government's defense, response, or resolution of public comments on the Draft EIS RUS, FWS, and IPG review of the preliminary Draft EIS will be completed and comments provided to the RUS contractor within 20 working days of receipt of the document. DRAFT August 5, 1998 The RUS contractor will assist RUS in consolidating and resolving comments on the preliminary Draft EIS. The RUS contractor shall incorporate changes into a final version of the Draft EIS that shall be submitted to RUS to be published for public review and comment. The final version of the Draft EIS will be provided in a format suitable for printing (Microsoft Word, Version 6.0 minimum file) and in an electronic format (Acrobat in “portable document format”) for inclusion on the Internet (RUS home page). 4.2.1.1 DRAFT EIS FORMAT The format of the Draft EIS shall consist of: Cover Sheet: (CEQ Regulations, Section 1502.11). Executive Summary: (CEQ Regulations, Section 1502.12). Table of Contents. List of acronyms and abbreviations. Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need for Action: (CEQ, Section 1502.13) Chapter 2 - Alternatives Including the Proposed Action: (CEQ, Section 502.14). Chapter 3 - Affected Environment: (CEQ, Section 1502.15). Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences: (CEQ Section 1502.16). Chapter 5 - List of Preparers: (CEQ Section 1502.17). Chapter 6 - List of Agencies, Organizations, and Persons to whom copies of the Draft EIS were sent. References cited. Index. Appendices (final EVAL). 4.2.1.2 TEXT AND GRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT Using the EVAL where possible, the RUS contractor shall edit the submitted information preparing revisions where necessary, to ensure that the text is technically sound and is written in a clear concise fashion. To the extent necessary, the RUS contractor shall coordinate with the IPG consultants the development of additional graphic diagrams, charts, illustrations, photos, photosimulations, supplemental sidebars and other graphic devices to enhance the readability and usefulness of the Draft EIS. 4.2.2 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT The IPG will file an application for a right-of-way through the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge with the FWS. Such application requires the FWS and RUS to conduce public hearings in Alaska, and Washington, D.C. as mandated by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). These public hearings will be scheduled during the 60-day comment period on the Draft EIS. A representative of the contractor shall attend these public hearings and shall be prepared to explain his role in the development of the EIS for this project. DRAFT August 5, 1998 4.2.3. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Public notification will be the responsibility of the Government. 5.0 MEETINGS 5.1 PROGRESS MEETINGS The RUS contractor shall attend progress meetings to present interim findings and the deliverables identified in Section 7.0. The progress meetings shall be scheduled to correspond to deliverable due dates. It is anticipated that the IPG and consultants will attend the formal meeting listed below whereas the FWS will participate in this meeting by teleconference. The RUS contractor shall transmit weekly status reports to RUS by e- mail. The RUS contractor shall maintain frequent and informal communication by telephone, fax, e-mail, letter, and/or meetings with RUS. A meéting of approximately 2-3 days will be scheduled in Washington, DC to discuss agency and IPG comments on the preliminary Draft EIS. The RUS contractor shall assist RUS in consolidating and resolving comments on the preliminary Draft EIS. 5.2. PUBLIC HEARINGS A representative of the RUS contractor shall attend the public hearings mandated by ANILCA that will be held in Alaska (Anchorage and Soldotna) and Washington, DC during the comment period on the Draft EIS. It is anticipated that one public hearing, scheduled after normal working hours, would be held at each location. The contractor shall be prepared to explain his role in the development of EIS for the project. 6.0 DOCUMENT PREPARATION & DISTRIBUTION Reproduction and distribution for all components of the Draft EIS shall be the responsibility of RUS. The RUS contractor shall submit camera-ready versions of all graphics or tables prepared as part of the Draft EIS by themselves and where the contractor has modified graphics or tables originally prepared by the IPG. DRAFT August 5, 1998 7.0 SCHEDULE Draft EIS Outline & Table of Contents Initial drafts of Draft EIS chapters. Chapter 2, Part 1 » Nn Chapter 4 Chapter 2, Part 2 an w | o Other Sections oo o Preliminary Draft EIS Draft EIS | Draft EIS Outline & Table of Contents | Po [Initial drafts of Draft EIS chapters. | |_—Chapter2,Partl [| Chapter |____Chapter2,Part2 ANILCA Hearings July 1999 Briefings, Status Updates As needed - After award of the delivery order a After receipt of the final EVAL *#* — After receipt of agency comments on Draft EIS Southern Intertie Project Confidential Page 1 USDA, RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE - CONTRACT NO. DACW69-97-D-0013 DELIVERY ORDER NO.2, MODIFICATION NO.0 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MANGI ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC., SCHEDULE A - LABOR HOURS PREPARE PREPARE — PREPARE ATTEND LABOR CATEGORY DRAFTEIS PRELIMNARY REVISED ANILCA = BRIEFINGS & +=MGMT& TOTAL OUTLINE DRAFTEIS DRAFTEIS HEARINGS MEETINGS ADMIN ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST VI 16 520 112 104 40 80 872 ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST V 6 120 48 20 194 ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST IV 6 120 48 20 194 ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST III 6 120 48 20 194 PHYSICAL SCIENTIST 0 TECHNICIAN 4 160 64 72 300 SECRETARY 4 48 6 12 16 12 98 TOTAL HOURS 42 1088 326 248 56 92 1852 SCHEDULE B - LABOR CATEGORY TOTAL LABOR TOTAL HOURS RATES COSTS ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST VI 872 $50.47 $44,010 ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST V 194 $50.47 $9,791 ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST IV 194 $50.47 $9,791 ENGINEER (GENERAL) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST III 194 $50.47 $9,791 PHYSICAL SCIENTIST $50.47 $0 TECHNICIAN 300 $36.10 $10,830 SECRETARY 98 $25.63 $2,512 SUBTOTAL $86,725 August 18, 1998 Southern Intertie Project SCHEDULE C - TRAVEL AND PER DIEM ASSUMPTION: ANILCA HEARINGS PER DIEM ($179/day) - 5 days total $895 AIRFARE $1,000 RENTAL CAR/ GAS ($50/DAY+GAS) $250 MISC TRAVEL EXPENSES $0 SUBTOTALS $2,145 SCHEDULE D - OTHER DIRECT COSTS PHONE/FAX ($1 PER 1.5 HOURS OF LABOR) $1,235 COPYING/REPRODUCTION ($1 PER 1.8 HOURS OF LABOR) $1,029 POSTAGE/SHIPPING ($1 PER 1.6 HOURS OF LABOR) $1,158 SUPPLIES/PUBLICATIONS ($1 PER 2.2 HOURS OF LABOR) $842 MISCELLANEOUS ($1 PER 2.6 HOURS OF LABOR) $712 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $4,976 TOTALS TOTAL DIRECT LABOR (SCHEDULE B) TOTAL TRAVEL AND PER DIEM (SCHEDULE C) OTHER DIRECT COSTS (SCHEDULE D) SUBTOTAL TRAVEL/PREDIEM AND ODCs G&A ON TRAVEL/PERDIEM AND ODCs (13.75%) TOTAL USACE CONTRACT & ADMIN COSTS (3%) August 18, 1998 Confidential Page 2 TOTALS $895 $1,000 $250 $0 $2,145 $1,235 $1,029 $1,158 $842 $712 $4,976 $86,725 $2,145 $4,976 $7,121 $979 $94,825 $2,845