Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S Intertie report 2-1997
CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. fi Chee \ kectric ASSOCIATION, INC. February 28, 1997 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority 480 West Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 Attention: Mr. Randy Simmons, Executive Director Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for February 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Dear Mr. Simmons: o)ECEIVE MAR 0 3 1997 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority Please find enclosed | (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for the Month of February 1997. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. Sincerely, Zee the Eugene N. Bjornstad General Manager ENG :ahw Enclosures: 1 (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report c: Lee Thibert Joe Griffith Michael Massin Dora Gropp John Cooley Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.0.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 « FAX 907-562-0027 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Report for the Month of FEBRUARY 1997 Report for the Month of February 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB February 28, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY hooters rat ante a aor us ra ra fa eceo asta wi otraig ta tae ta tanta oro ot ot-oyfartonca I-1 FINANCIAL II-1 II. 5 = - Chugach Statement for December 1996 - Bank Statement of January 1997 S@BIEDUIEE avace a1 aitor ouceissirntfa toe 4 oto on oh clcstosto ete slo oro slielioliolic ie ie fwleuecc-o «lal Iil-1 ITEMS FOR APPROVAD disteteiererels. ov: olfeiforeieyollere « oelielielieueieiele ee 6 610 Iv-1 None ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 3.5065 ccc cscccc cece es tivnsccccccens V-1 None ITEMS FOR INFORMATION .......... eee cece cece cece eeeee VI-1 - Power Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, February 14, 1997 - Amendment #1 to USFS Collection Agreement, February 17, 1997 - EPA Letter of February 14, 1997 ii Report for the Month of February 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB February 28, 1997 SUMMARY The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the federal lead agencies (RUS, USFS, USFWS) and the “applicant” (Chugach Electric on behalf of the IPG) is still being finalized. Efforts are concentrating on how the development of the EIS can be structured under the various regulations governing the three lead agencies. While our consultants are performing work not directly affected by the MOU, delays will be encountered if this document cannot be finalized within the next month. A Collection Agreement with the USFWS in the amount of $29,274.00 and an amendment to the existing Agreement with the USFS in the amount of $29,684.00 are being executed to insure continued timely involvement of these lead agencies’ staff. The Scoping Report (draft) has been submitted to the agencies for approval. This report will become the basis for the EIS preparation and will be distributed to all IPG members and placed in public libraries when finalized. EPA Region X has commented on the process (letter included in Part VI of this report.) The consultant’s work is 38% complete and behind in the impact and mitigation assessment phase as well as engineering studies. It is generally felt that the engineering tasks can be completed in a timely manner, but the scoping process’ impact on subsequent environmental work can only be assessed after the Scoping Document is approved by the agencies. Project presentations have been made to three Community Councils and the Alaska Center for the Environment during the past month. The next Community Working Group meetings are scheduled for March 3, 1997 in Kenai and March 5, 1997 in Anchorage. Additional meetings will be held to result in the selection of a preferred alternative supported by these groups. 1-1 Report for the Month of February 1997 Southern Intertie - Phase IB Il. FINANCIAL DESCRIPTION BUDGET ALLOCATED CONTINGENCY AMENDMENTS TOTAL COMMITMENT $ SUMMARY POWER $201,295.30 $ ENGINEERS $3,043,423.00 TOTAL $3,244,718.30 | $110,000.00 | $440,000.0 0 0 3 347,765.30 | $110,000.00 | $440,000.0 | $3,897,765.3 0 SPENT TO DATE $1,163,522.00 $5,270.00 | $53,567.00 | $1,222,359.0 0 % OF TOTAL 34.76% 4.79% 12.17% 31.36% USFS/USFW | CHUGAC Ss H $100,000.00 | $400,000.0 W.0.#E9590081 February 28, 1997 $3,543,423.0 0 $10,000.00 | $40,000.00 $251,295.30 | $3,794,718.3 0 $103,047.00 Note: “Spent to Date” only shows amounts invoiced or booked as of date of report. Overall Project Expenditures (Phase IA and IB) to date: I-1 $2,084,229 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska February 13, 1997 fi dou TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Kimberly Pond, Plant Apeoartent ee SUBJECT: 9590081 - Southern Intertie Route Selection Study You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Souther Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occured during December 1996. Direct Labor 5,787.06 Indirect Labor 1,627.57 Power Engineers Invoice # 42030 42,082.00 Power Engineers Invoice # 42031 89,331.24 Power Engineers Invoice # 42032 23,900.76 Power Engineers Invoice # 42033 5,705.00 Power Engineers Invoice # 42034 7,948.57 Power Engineers Invoice # 42035 9,513.15 Power Engineers Invoice # 42622 67,538.28 Power Engineers Invoice # 42623 19,728.47 Power Engineers Invoice # 42624 10,408.31 Power Engineers Invoice # 42625 13,351.85 Power Engineers Invoice # 42626 7,645.41 Power Engineers Invoice # 42627 1,936.89 Federal Express Invoice # 5-986-52008 15.50 Superior Logistics Invocé # 1535 126.11 Arctic Office Products Invoice # 314811-1 20.93 Sub-Total $306,667.10 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) 1,533.34 Total Charges . $308,200.44 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As you requested, I'll keep the original in my files. oncur: . 2 [ KP/kp WOfiles/E9590081 Attachments Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary January, 1997 December Ending Balance forward Total Deposits Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for November charges) Interest Earned Balance January 31, 1997 $1,371,385.70 $496,513.00 ($235,909.18) $7,704.16 $1,639,693.68 , OQ CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT First: National Bank of Anchorage Account Number: 0110 606 1 Member FDIC Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Jan 31 1997 Pog: 1 of 2 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC SOUTHERN INTERTIE GRANT FUND PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 FIRSTLINE: (907) 265-4700 BRANCH: MAIN BRANCH (907) 265-3525 Baie eae] Sie acne ae aie ele ae ABCOUNt SUMMATY icac—saawenencesecwenseee ww ene ~~ wecwrerersan—) PREVIOUS BALANCE AS OF 12/31/96 $.00 Service Charge This Month $.00 43 Deposits & Other Credits $36,484,542.60 Interest Paid This Month $.00 22 Checks and Other Debits $36,484,542.60 CURRENT BALANCE AS OF 01/31/97 $.00 Amount Date Description 496,513.00 01/02 INCOMING WIRE TRANSFER - 1,371,385.70 01/02 REPO CREDIT 401.51 01/02 REPO INTEREST + 868,300.21 01/03 REPO CREDIT 273.50 01/03 REPO INTEREST 1,868,573.71 01/06 REPO CREDIT 820.62 01/06 REPO INTEREST , 869,394.33 01/07 REPO CREDIT 270.54 01/07 REPO INTEREST 1,869,664.87 01/08 REPO CREDIT 270.58 01/08 REPO INTEREST , 869,935.45 01/09 REPO CREDIT 270.62 01/09 REPO INTEREST +,870,206.07 01/10 REPO CREDIT 270.66 01/10 REPO INTEREST * 870,476.73 01/13 REPO CREDIT 812.10 01/13 REPO INTEREST , 871,288.83 01/14 REPO CREDIT 271.86 01/14 REPO INTEREST 1,635,651.51 01/15 REPO CREDIT 237.62 01/15 REPO INTEREST , 635,889.13 01/16 REPO CREDIT 237.66 01/16 REPO INTEREST 1,636, 126.79 01/17 REPO CREDIT 237.69 01/17 REPO INTEREST 636,364.48 01/21 REPO CREDIT 950.91 01/21 REPO INTEREST 1,637,315.39 01/22 REPO CREDIT 236.96 01/22 REPO INTEREST ,637,552.35 01/23 REPO CREDIT 236.99 01/23 REPO INTEREST z 1,637,789.34 01/24 REPO CREDIT 237.02 01/24 REPO INTEREST » 638,026.36 01/27 REPO CREDIT CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Jan 31 1997 Pog: =2 OF 2 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC CYCBI O8c 6042 warren manne neem nn nnn anne nn nn nn ne ene nn anne Other Credits ---------------------- 222-202-2222 n ene == =~ Amount Date Description 711.18 01/27 REPO INTEREST +,638,737.54 01/28 REPO CREDIT 238.98 01/28 REPO INTEREST 638,976.52 01/29 REPO CREDIT 239.02 01/29 REPO INTEREST 639,215.54 01/30 REPO CREDIT 239.05 01/30 REPO INTEREST 1.639,454.59 01/31 REPO CREDIT 239.09 01/31 REPO INTEREST Ineeranennnnennenernnnnnoececcosenn wonc> Other Debits --------------------- 2-2-2 nn nnn nn enn nnn nnn nn --- Amount Date Description 868,300.21 01/02 REPO DEBIT 868,573.71 01/03 REPO DEBIT 1,869,394.33 01/06 REPO DEBIT 1.869,664.87 01/07 REPO DEBIT 869,935.45 01/08 REPO DEBIT 870,206.07 01/09 REPO DEBIT 1,870,476.73 01/10 REPO DEBIT 1,871,288.83 01/13 REPO DEBIT 235,909.18 01/14 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION - IC DRAFT 635,651.51 01/14 REPO DEBIT . 635,889.13 01/15 REPO DEBIT 1,636,126.79 01/16 REPO DEBIT * 636,364.48 01/17 REPO DEBIT 637,315.39 01/21 REPO DEBIT 637,552.35 01/22 REPO DEBIT 1,637,789.34 01/23 REPO DEBIT 1,638,026.36 01/24 REPO DEBIT 638,737.54 01/27 REPO DEBIT 638,976.52 01/28 REPO DEBIT - 639,215.54 01/29 REPO DEBIT 1,639,454.59 01/30 REPO DEBIT * 639,693.68 01/31 REPO DEBIT it your equity to work. rest paid may be up to 100% tax-deductible. Apply at any branch. FNBA is an equal housing lender. ’ Our HomeFlex Equity Line has two interest rate options in one program plus the Report for the Month of February 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB February 28, 1997 Til. SCHEDULE Iil-1 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE 29197 PHASE |B 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID__| Task Name %Comp. | Act.Cost_ [a2] a3] a4[ ai [a2] as[ a4 [ai] az] as[as|ai[a2fasfas{ar[a2}as[as|ai[a2}asfas|ai 1 | ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEE 37% | $2,087,537.20 ; 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 13%| $52,003.80 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUD 100% | $871,650.00 4 | EIS & PRELENGINEERIN 40% | $1,163,883.40 5 SCOPING 98%| $344,032.72 6 INVENTORY 76%| $534,661.00 7 IMPACT/MITIGATION 9%| — $52,560.90 8 ALTERN.SELECTION 0%| $1,392.08 9 DRAFT EIS 0% $0.00 10 FINAL EIS 0% $0.00 "1 STUDIES 31%| $33,175.00 12 ENG.FIELD WORK 79%| $160,089.62 13 PREL. ENGINEERING 20%| $37,972.08 Task Ee Summary ay Rolled Up Progress TS See | ME Rolled Up Task fy Milestone ea Rolled Up Milestone <> C:\WINPROJ\SOUTHTIE\PH_IB.MPP Page 1 Report for the Month of February 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB February 28, 1997 IV. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL None. Iv-1 Report for the Month of February 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB February 28, 1997 V. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. Report for the Month of February 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB February 28, 1997 VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION - Power Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, February 14, 1997 - Amendment #1 to USFS Collection Agreement, February 17, 1997 - EPA Letter of February 14, 1997 #) 2 LMWER February 14, 1997 = ECEIVE = & 3 a” Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive Anchorage, AK 99519 Subject: POWER Project #120376 EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract #95-208 Monthly Status Report No. 8 : For Period Jan. 12, 1997 - Feb. 8, 1997 Dear Dora: The following activities were performed during this invoicing period on the Environmental Impact Statement (EJS) and Preliminary Engineering portion of the Southern Intertie Project. Key Issues: e The updated Project Schedule will be completed upon agreement of a final Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). e Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. In addition, the continuing development of the MOU and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. Invoice Period Overview: Preparation of scoping report Analysis and summarization of additional scoping comments received Meeting with USFWS regarding scope of biological issues to be addressed Two meetings with co-lead agencies to review MOU Scoping report and work plan reviewed with USFWS Revision of draft work plan based on comments from USFWS CWG meetings - Anchorage, Kenai Three community council meetings Completion of digitizing geology and vegetation data Continued data refinement for cultural, land use/recreation, visual Continued impact assessment criteria development using scoping comments Continued work on the system studies Continued work on preliminary engineering PEI-HLY 23-049 POWER Engineers, Incorporated Tee ee 3940 Glenbrook Dr. * P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey, Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association February 14, 1997 Page 2 Work Planned for the Next Invoice Period: e Continue to work with the CWGs e Continued preparation/organization of MOU e Continued refinement of land use/recreation, visual, biology, geology, and socioeconomic resources data e Continued work on preliminary engineering e Continued work on the engineering studies e Issue final hydrographic report Schedule: The schedule update is dependent on the final MOU agreement. The updated schedule will include tasks to account for the Alaska National Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA) application process. An updated schedule will be issued upon completion of the MOU and Scoping Report. We are behind schedule on some of the activities but expect to be back on schedule by the end of the summer of 1997. Monthly Status Report Issues: This monthly status report contains a Project Summary Report spreadsheet to reflect the current and projected cash flows. The Project Summary Report will be reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if an update is required. Task 1 - Scoping The key issue is obtaining a final MOU agreement. Task 2 - Inventory The continuing development of the MOU and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. Task 3 - Impact Assessment/Mitigation Planning The work planned for October, November and December 1996 will be performed during December (January invoice) - June 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. PEI-HLY 23-049 poe a Chugach Electric Association February 14, 1997 Page 3 Task 8 - Engineering Field Work Expect to issue final hydrographics study report in February 1997. We will schedule a conference call to discuss submarine cable installation. Task 9 - Preliminary Engineering The work originally planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. Project Overview: Total Budget $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,163,522 Actual Remaining Project Budget $1,982,947 Summary and Status of Agency MOU Process: One of the key issues on the Southern Intertie Project is obtaining agreement of a final Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The following is a summary of the MOU process at this point. In mid-September 1996, the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) agreed to be the lead federal agency for the Southern Intertie Project. A meeting took place with RUS on September 30/October 1, 1996 in Washington, D.C. to discuss the project. RUS agreed to the Intertie Participants Group using Dames & Moore to complete EVAL documentation. RUS determined that they would use the EVAL to prepare the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), along with input from cooperating agencies. On November 12, 1996, the first meeting between RUS, the Forest Service, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) occurred in Anchorage. The Forest Service and USFWS had determined at this point that they would be co-lead agencies along with RUS. The first draft of the MOU was reviewed, and project logistics were discussed. After the November 12 meeting, RUS informed Dames & Moore and the other co-lead agencies that they could not play a central role in the EIS as indicated in the first draft of the MOU due to staffing problems. Between November 1996 and the middle of January 1997, there were four meetings with the agencies to discuss the MOU. During that time, the agencies indicated that the Applicant’s consultant could play a central role in preparing the EIS. The initial concept PEI-HLY 23-049 i) poe Chugach Electric Association February 14, 1997 Page 4 was that the consultant could conduct the environmental analysis and prepare a preliminary draft EIS for review and approval by the agencies. A Draft and Final EIS would be prepared jointly by the agencies, with technical assistance provided by the Applicant’s consultant. On January 24, 1997 at an MOU meeting with the Forest Service and USFWS in Anchorage, it was suggested that the consultant could prepare the EIS. At that time, Dames & Moore decided that direction given by the agencies for the consultant to prepare the EIS had strayed too far from National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations. There had been confusion amongst the agencies between the requirements for an environmental assessment (EA) and the requirements for an EIS. As a result, Dames & Moore approached RUS and expressed a need to return to the, preparation of an EVAL in order to remain in compliance with their existing regulations. In these discussions, RUS agreed that the EIS would be prepared either through their staff with assistance from the Forest Service and USFWS or through at third-party contractor. The February 6 version of the MOU stipulates that the agencies will prepare an EIS either with their own staff or with the assistance of a third-party consultant. The Applicant and its consultants may provide data to agencies for consideration in preparing the EIS. Work is continuing on obtaining agreement of a final MOU. We have scheduled a meeting with the agencies for February 25, 1997 to finalize the MOU. Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to call me or Mike Walbert. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. Lal Zzlz7 Randy Pollock, P.E. Gee Project Manager MW/rth cc: PROJECT TEAM PEI-HLY 23-049 +) owes SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 120376-01 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY FEBRUARY, 1997 INVOICE Base Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Project Total Not to Exceed Budget $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 lI $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amendment No. 4 $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 $32,866 $4,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,046 Total Not to Exceed Budget Actual Budget Expended Through Previous Invoice $374,839 $287,505 $679,591 $606,612 $495,514 $40,544 $336,341 $407,474 $0 $247,616 $0 $101,480 $27,588 $202,655 $157,028 $189,861 $34,531 $3,146,469 $1,044,079 Current Invoice Amount $59,509 $33,908 $14,998 $0 $0 $0 $5,455 $2,827 $2,746 $119,443 Actual Budget Expended Through Current Invoice $347,014 $529,422 : $55,542 $1,369 $0 $0 $33,043 $159,855 $37,277 $1,163,522 Remaining Budget PELHLY 23-049 $27,825 $150,169 $551,070 $334,972 $407,474 $247,616 $68,437 $42,800 $152,584 $1,982,947 FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 1 - SCOPING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-049 Scoping Preparation of scoping report Analysis and summarization of additional scoping comments received Meeting with USFWS regarding scope of biological issues to be addressed Two meetings with co-lead agencies to review MOU Scoping report and work plan reviewed with USFWS Revision of draft work plan based on comments from USFWS CWG meetings - Anchorage, Kenai Three community council meetings Community Working Group meetings were held in Kenai on January 13, 1997 and in Anchorage on January 14, 1997. Obtaining a final MOU agreement. No outstanding issues. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($351,050 + $23,789 = $374,839). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 374,839 347,014 27,825 No outstanding issues. FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 2 - INVENTORY DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Inventory Completion of digitizing geology and vegetation data Continued data refinement for cultural, land KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-049 use/recreation, visual Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. In addition, the continuing development of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. No outstanding issues. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($660,706 + $18,885 = $679,591). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 679,591 529,422 150,169 No outstanding issues. FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 3 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Impact Assessment/ |e Continued impact assessment criteria Mitigation Planning development using scoping comments KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-049 Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. In addition, the continuing development of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. Work began in December, 1996. The work planned for October, November and December, 1996 will be performed during January - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($584,010 + $22,602 = $606,612). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 606,612 55,542 551,070 No outstanding issues. FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 4 - ALTERNATIVE SELECTION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Alternative Selection e Work expected to start on this task in the next 30 days. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($303,475 + $32,866 = $336,341). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 336,341 1,369 334,972 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-049 4 FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 5 - DRAFT EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-049 Draft EIS e Some work is expected to be performed on this task in the next 30 days. However, work is expected to begin in earnest in June, 1997. No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($402,570 + $4,904 = $407,474). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining $407,474 00 $407,474 No outstanding issues. FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 6 - FINAL EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Final EIS e No action. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 247,616 00 247,616 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-049 6 FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 7 - STUDIES DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-049 Studies No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted 101,480 No outstanding issues. Worked on the alternate load studies, system N-1 outages, and dynamic stability analysis. The battery energy storage (BES) models in PTI appear to be operating properly. Working on required reactive compensation for the submarine cable routes. $ Expended $ Remaining 33,043 68,437 FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 8 - ENGINEERING FIELD WORK DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Engineering Field Work |e Worked on finalizing the Hydrographics Study report. KEY ISSUES: Schedule a conference call to discuss submarine cable installation. SCHEDULE: Expect to issue final hydrographics study report in February, 1997. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 202,655 159,855 42,800 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-049 8 FEBRUARY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 9 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Preliminary Engineering |e Continued work on preliminary design and cost estimates for overhead lines. KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-049 No outstanding issues. The work planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 189,861 BT 217 1523584 No outstanding issues. SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line 1D | Task Name Start Finish Apr_| May | me [Aug T Sep JT Oct J Nov | Dec Jan_[ Feb | Mar | Apr | May Thee [Aug T Sep | Oct J Nov | Dec van | Feb [ Mar | Apr | May | Tom [Aug [| Sep [ Oct | Nov | Dec Jan_[ Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun a | tascTscorma a a 3 FILE NOTICE OF INTENT WITH FEDERAL REGISTER 75/96 78/96 | i 5 MOUs WITH COOPERATING AND REVIEWING AGENCY 11/1196 13/97 Es i 7 DEVELOP BASE MAPS AND ORDER PHOTOGRAPHY 6/11/96 TAN96 | REE i ° PUBLIC/AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS - INITIAL INTERAGENCY 973/96 11/1196 : MEETING Rs i 11 PREPARE MATERIALS/DEVELOP MAILING LIST 7/15/96 978/96 aad | 13 FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES AND FIELD REVIEW 6/24/96 9/27/96 cree | 15 DOCUMENTATION (SCOPING REPORT/PREPARATION PLAN) 6/24/96 2728/97 i TEE ET 7 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 9/30/96 va197 i SEE 19 TASK 2 INVENTORY 6/11/96 31/20/97 : CEE ee PE 20 INVENTORY ALTERNATIVES e196 1176/96 i ‘TEE i 2 "CONDUCT FIELD REVIEW AND AGENCY CONTACTS 6/11/96 10/9/96 i Te i 24 DATA MANAGEMENT 8/13/96 11/27/96 i BE i 26 DOCUMENTATION 10/16/96 9/8/97 u ES I 28 ‘ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION 5/9/97 11/2097 EEE a 30 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESSEMENT AND MITIGATION PLANNING R296 6/30/97 | Se es) a DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIPTIONLOGATION 7296 11/8/96 i ES 33 DEVELOP IMP 10721796 11/8/96 sy 35 CONDUCT INITIAL AMP 1178/96 12/6/96 —_ 7 ‘AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 12/9/96 1a/97 39 FINALIZE IA/MP 2397 228/97 —_ i 4 DOCUMENTATION 2728/97 6/30/97 -_ EEE? Ee 43 ‘AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 497 425/97 [= Critical completion Point 45 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION ans? ‘8n9/87 72 Tina 46 DEVELOP ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION CRITERIA 497 418/97 48 CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION 421197 S4/97 = E) "AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 8/15/97 wi3/97| ia z 52 DOCUMENTATION 6/7/97 8/29/97 a - Bese TIE 34 ‘AGENCY AND PROPONENT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 63/97 7A8/97 SELECTION 56 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS 23/97 3/20/98 ae = DEVELOP BURSSE mb EHS > oa Wo EE a 59 PREPARE EVAL 6/20/97 87/97 SE 61 AGENCY REVIEW 8/19/97 9/3/97 i SSE 63 FINALIZE EVAL 9/3/97 10/13/97 i Bs] 65 PREPARE DEIS 10/14/97 11/24/97 i BF] 7 ‘AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 11/25/97 12/19/97 Td a 69 PRINT DEIS 12/22/97 1/9/98 aa 71 FILE WITH EPA 1/14/98 3/20/98 aE 73 DISTRIBUTE 1/26/98 1/30/98 DEE | £ Roba ae Tiere Task = Micstone ® Suny 02/08/97 PROJECT SCHEDULE SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line 1996 1997 1998 1 10 |Task Name Start Finish Apr_[ May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec Jan] Feb | Mar | Apr] May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov ] Dec Jan_| Feb | Mar May | Jun Ju. Ay 3S Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun ug ug Apr ce Aug ep 7 PUBLIC REVIEW 2/2/98 3/20/98 Tee 7 FEDERAL HEARING 216/98 3/11/98 Za a =—_ an “GLE, TRE 80 RESPOND TO COMMENTS 3/20/98 417/98 a 82 PREPARE PRELIMINARY FEIS 472098 5/20/98 Ta 34 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 5/21/98 e098 raed 86 PREPARE FEIS 6/11/98 713/98 = 8 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 716/98 727198 = 90 PRINT 7/28/98 a/ia/98 = 92 FILE WITH EPA 8/20/98 9/2/98 a 94 DISTRIBUTE 9/4/98 9/9/98 i 96 PUBLIC REVIEW 9/9/98 10/23/98 98 RECORD OF DECISION 7/6/98 7/28/98 100 TASK 7 STUDIES TASS 227198 101 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM STUDIES TAI: 12/13/96 106 EIS & PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS TASISG 8/14/97 111 TASK 6 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK 6/14/96 8/16/97 112 HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES 6/14/96 10/14/96 115 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 7196 1/2/97 17, FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 614/96 aieo7 119 ‘SUMMARY REPORT 10/18/96 2497 121 TASK 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 8/1/96 9/16/97 141 PUBLIC/AGENCY INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM TNOI96 7/3198 142 INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM 111796 7RTI9B 143 1D TEAM FORMULATION 11/1/96 11/8/96 144 MEETINGS 117986 7/27/98 145 COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP (ANCHORAGE ONLY) 8/5/96 4n4s7 146 INTERVIEWS 7 8/5/96 8/30/96 147 MEETINGS 9/3/96 4/24/97 148 PUBLIC MEETING/HEARING 9/3/96 312198 149 SCOPING MEETINGS (3) 9/3/96 11/1/96 CEILI * s22ping mosis 150 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE (3) (OPTIONAL) 5/1197 8/21/97 QTE) 3 Public Open Houses 151 PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) 2/2/98 3/2/98 [III] 3 Pubtic Hearings 152 NEWSLETTERS/FACT SHEETS A096 7731/98 @& T r z I r J Te } TOTTI) 4 tierrniattorstPact Sheet , POWER Engineers, Inc. — oon s unney Project: 120376-01 Revision #1 02/08/97 PROJECT SCHEDULE POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:11AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com; ID Number —_ Description Resp Indiv Start Finish “~""”P 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-01 Subtask Description: BASE MAP/PHOTOGRAPHY 1.1.01 Reproducible Map/Atlas(using quad maps) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 ~ 9/30/96 100 1.1.02 Presentation Maps(EIS/Public Meetings) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 100 1.1.03 Color Aerial Photos(1 stereo) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-A 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":500' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-B 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":2000' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-02 Subtask Description: PUBLIC/AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS 1.2.01 File Notice of Intent with Fed Register Lead Agency 10/15/96 10/15/96 100 1.2.02 Develop MOU with Agencies Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 1/3/97 97 1.2.03 RUS Scheduled Review Times Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 1/31/97 90 1.2.04 Identify scope of issues to be addressed Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 12/31/96 95 1.2.05 Develop Preparation Plan Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 = 1/15/97 97 1.2.06 Review Preparation Plan Chugach Electric 1/15/97 1/31/97 85 1.2.07 40 Copies of Preparation Plan for EIS Tim Tetherow 2/20/97 2/28/97 0 1.2.08 Public Notification for Scoping Meetings Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.09 Conduct/Coordinate Agency Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 = 12/31/96 100 1.2.10 Conduct/Coordinate Public Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 1.2.11 1 Meeting Anchorage(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 = 11/29/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID fathan teaaevina Resp Indiv start Finish = Cop ae a a iceue 1 Meeting Cooper Landing(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.13 1 Meeting Soldotna(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.14 Attend 1 Mtg(Anch,Cooper,Soldotna) Randy Pollock 11/1/96 = 11/29/96 100 1.2.15 Prepare Mat for Public/Agency Scoping Mtg Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.16 Prepare Issues/Scoping Report(documentation) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 © 12/31/96 85 27, Provide Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.18 Update Existing Public & Agency Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.19 Review & Approve Mailing List Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.20 Newsletter # 1 (prior to scoping) Tim Tetherow 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 12.21 Review and Approve Fact Sheet/Newsletter Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.22 Establish CWG in Anchorage Tim Tetherow 9/2/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.23 25 Key Informant Interviews(Anchorage) Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.24 12-15 Interviews Kenai/determine need for CWG Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.25 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 1.2.26 ID Team Meeting #1 (Scoping) , Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 / . 12:27 50 Copies Executive Summary Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 1.2.28 20 Copies Environmental Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-03 Subtask Description: FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES 1.3.03 Review Alternatives Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 10/31/96 100 1.3.04 Field Review of Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 9/27/96 100 1.3.05 Identification of Alternatives for EIS Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp | % Com ID Number _ Description onset Start Finish ~~”? 50% Client _Final 1.3.06 Agency Meeting to finalize Alternatives Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-04 Subtask Description: SCOPING REPORT it 1.4.01 , Agency Review & Approval of Scoping Rpt Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 . 1/31/97 0 1.4.02 40 Copies of Scoping Report Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:12AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Ci IDNumber _ Description pia Start Finish “~~~”? 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-01 Subtask Description: DATA COLLECTION 2.1.00 ID Team Mtg(Inventory Results) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 ~ 12/31/96 0 2.1.01 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 2:1,02 |, Inventory of Resource Data/Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 11/6/96 90 2.1.30 CWG Mtg(Inventory/Assessement Criteria Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 2.2.01 Compile and Reproduce Inventory Maps Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 70 2.2.02 Provide Associated Data Tables by Route | Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 30 2.2.03 Additional Review & Documentation Tim Tetherow 5/7/97 11/20/97 45 ; Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-03 Subtask Description: PRIVATE LANDS/PARCEL RESEARCH 2.3.01 Identify Number of Parcels for Routes Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-A 5 Routes Anchorage Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-B Tesoro Route-Kenai Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-C Tesoro Route - Soldotna (up to 3 routes) Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-D Enstar Route Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-E Quartz Creek Route - Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 SNe ee respi Manone owe kcome sone ee 2.3.01-F Quartz Creek between Portage & University Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02 ID Owner,Size, Config sub cable landfall sites Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-A 3 Sites Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-B 5 Sites north side of Turnagain Arm Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.03 ID Owner, Size,Config of t Alternate Substn Sites Frank Rowland 8/13/96 ~— 11/27/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-04 Subtask Description: RIGHT OF ENTRY 2.4.01 Provide Right of Entry for ElS Field Studies Frank Rowland 10/15/96 9/8/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-05 Subtask Description: PROPERTY SURVEY SUPPORT 2.5.01 Conduct Centerline Surveys Soldotna Area Frank Rowland 5/7/97 11/20/97 0 2.5.02 Conduct Centerline Surveys Bernice Lake Area Frank Rowland 5/7/97 11/20/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:13 AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask EE el Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates’ , Scheduled Review Dates % Com ID Number Description sitesi Start Finish ° ? 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-01 Subtask Description: DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIP/LOCAT 3.1.00 Develop Project Description Tim Tetherow 7/22/96 11/8/96 85 3.1.01 ID Team Review of impact criteria, results, mtg Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 3.1.02 Attend CWG Meeting(Impact Assessement) Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 0 3.1.03 IPG Review of Impacts Chugach Electric 2/14/97 2/28/97 0 3.1.04 Final Determination of Project Description Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/8/96 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-02 Subtask Description: CONDUCT ASSES/MITIGATION PLAN 3.2.01 IA/MP Site Specific Models Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 11/29/96 25 3.2.02 Impact Maps & Tables Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 2/28/97 0 3.2.03 Develop/Conduct |A/MPP Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 20 3.2.03-A Define:Potential Direct/Indirect/Cumltv Impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 5 3.2.03-B Define: Interrelationships(cause/effect)impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 5 3.2.03-C Define: Criteria Definition Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 15 3.2.03-D Define: Determination of Impact Significance Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 5 3.2.04 Preliminary Mitigation Asessement(mitigation ID) Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 0 3.2.05 Review Preliminary Mitigation Criteria Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 0 3.2.06 Review Prel Assessement & Mitigation Plan . Randy Pollock 1/16/98 1/31/97 0 3.2.07 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 4/1/97 4/25/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID Number Desctption Resp indy Siar Fintan CO" oH Chant Final 3.2.08 Impacts Reassessed Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 0 3.2.09 Residual Impacts Determined Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 3/31/97 0 3.2.10 Finalize Results |A/MP Address Cumulative Effects Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-03 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 3.3.01 |A/MPP Incorporated into DEIS & FEIS Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.02 Mitigation Measures incorporated into ROD Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.03 Agency Review & Approval Tim Tetherow 5/15/97 = 5/30/97 0 3.3.04 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.05 Review & Approve Preliminary Results Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 1:26PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-04 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates % ID Number Description Reepinary Start Finish til 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-01 Subtask Description: ENVIRO PREFERRED ALTERNVE SELC 4.1.01 Compilation of Impact Data/by Alternative Tim Tetherow 4/1197 4/18/97 0 4.1.02 Development of Criteria&Rte Comparison Mat Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.03 Two Day Route Comparison Meeting Tim Tetherow 4/16/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.04 ID Team Meeting(Envirn Pfrd Rte & Agency/Pro Tim Tetherow 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.05 CWG Meetings(Comparison of Alternatives) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.06 IPG Meeting Chugach Electric 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.07 Public Open House (Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-A Anchorage(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-B Cooper Landing(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-C Soldotna(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.08 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 4/21/97 = 4/30/97 0 4.1.09 Select Agency Preferred Route Lead Agency 5/15/97 ~—- 6/13/97 0 4.1.10 Comparison & Cross Discipline rankings/Alt Corr Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/30/97 0 4.1.11 Consideration of Public & Agency Comments Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 —_ 7/18/97 0 4.1.12 Select Environmentally Preferred Alternative Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 —_ 7/18/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 4.2.01 Newsletter # 2 (Route Selection Results) Tim Tetherow 7/1/97 7/31/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-04 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv % Com ID Number Description P Start Finish a P 50% Client Final 4.2.02 Review & Approve Newsletter # 2 Chugach Electric 7/15/97 7/31/97 0 4.2.03 Documentation of Route Selection Process Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 8/29/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:14AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Ci IDNumber _ Description ent Start Finish ~~~”? 50% Client _—_—Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-01 Subtask Description: PDEIS PREPARATION 5.1.01 ID Team Mtg # 4 (PDEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 9/1/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.02 Environmental Data Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.03 14 - 8 1/2 X 11 Color Map Photos Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.04 2 - 18 X 30 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.05 23 - 11 X 17 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.06 Develop Purpose and Need Statement Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.07 Prepare Preliminary DEIS Tim Tetherow 6/23/97 = 9/17/97 0 5.1.08 40 Copies (150 pages each) PDEIS Tim Tetherow 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.09 Distribution of Copies Chugach Electric 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.10 Review PDEIS Chugach Electric 9/1/97 9/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-02 Subtask Description: DEIS PREPARATION 5.2.01 ID Team Mtg # 5 (DEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 11/3/97 11/28/97 0 §.2.02 Compile & Incorporate Changes to PDEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 5.2.03 Finalize DEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 5.2.04 Review DEIS Lead Agency 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 5.2.05 Review & Approve DEIS Chugach Electric 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask ere A Re eae SaeaeD Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com, ID Number Description fnep batty Start Finish i r 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DISTRIBUTE 5.3.01 Provide Lead Agency Signature Lead Agency 1/14/98 3/16/98 0 5.3.02 "File with EPA Tim Tetherow 1/14/98 | 3/20/98 0 5.3.03 Print & Distribute DEIS Tim Tetherow 12/22/97 = 1/9/98 0 5.3.04 200 Copies(150 pgs/each) to Lead Fed Agency Tim Tetherow 1/26/98 1/30/98 0 §.3.05 Publish Notices of Availability Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.3.06 Distribute Copies to Interested Parties & Agencies Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.4.01 ID Team Meeting # 6 (Pre-Hearing) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.02 Newsletter # 3 (Announce Public Hearings) . Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.03 Review & Approve Newsletter # 3 Chugach Electric 1/15/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.04 Schedule & Conduct Public Hearing # 1 Tim Tétherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-A Anchorage Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-B Cooper Landing Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-C Soldotna Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.05 Public/Agency Review of DEIS Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.06 Recieve/Compile Public Comments on DEIS Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.07 Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.08 Attend Federal Hearings Tim Tetherow 2/16/98 3/11/98 0 POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:14AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R I % Com ID Number —_ Description oan mie Start Finish ~~" ”P 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-01 Subtask Description: PFEIS PREPARATION 6.1.01 Newsletter(Announce FEIS) Tim Tetherow 7/1/98 7/31/98 0 6.1.02 ID Team Mtg(Rvw Comments) Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 3/31/98 0 6.1.03 Respond to comments Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 4/17/98 0 6.1.04 Prepare PFEIS Tim Tetherow 4/20/98 5/20/98 0 6.1.05 ID Team Mtg(Review PFEIS) Tim Tetherow 5/1/98 5/29/98 0 6.1.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency §/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.07 Review PFEIS Chugach Electric 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.08 40 Copies of PFEIS Tim Tetherow 5/11/98 5/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-02 Subtask Description: FEIS PREPARATION 6.2.01 Compile & Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.2.02 Prepare FEIS Tim Tetherow 6/11/98 7/3/98 0 6.2.03 Review & Approve FEIS Chugach Electrié 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 6.2.04 Provide Lead Agency Signature Tim Tetherow 8/10/98 8/20/98 0 6.2.05 Prepare FEIS for Printing Tim Tetherow 7/28/98 8/18/98 0 6.2.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indi % Com, IDNumber _ Description — Start Finish ~~”? 50% Client —_—Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DOCUMENTATION 6.3.01 Print & Distribute FEIS Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 6.3.02 200 Copies for Distribution Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC REVIEW 6.4.01 FEIS Available to Public Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 6.4.02 Public Review Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-05 Subtask Description: RECORD OF DECISION 6.5.01 File FEIS with EPA Lead Agency 8/20/98 9/2/98 0 6.5.02 Record of Decision Lead Agency 7/6/98 8/28/98 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:15AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Indi % C ID Number _ Description cae eae? Start Finish “~~” ”P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-05 Subtask Description: INDUCTIVE COORDINATION STUDIES 7.5.01 Summary Report William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 50 7.5.02 Recommend Dsg Parameters William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 70 7.5.03 Telephone Contacts William Riall 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-06 Subtask Description: EMF CALCULATIONS 7.6.01 EMF Models Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 20 7.6.02 EIS & Prelim Eng Calculations Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 0 7.6.03 Text & Graphs or Charts-EIS Larry Henriksen 75/96 8/14/97 20 7.6.04 RFI/TVI & Audible Noise Analysis Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 0 7.6.05 Attendance at Public Hearings (Mike Silva) Larry Henriksen 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-07 Subtask Description: CATHODIC PROTECTION 7.7.01 Summary Report William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 10 7.7.02 Recommend Design Parameters William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 10 7.7.03 Office Visit to Pipeline-Anchorage William Riall 75/96 8/14/97 100 7.7.04 Telephone Contact of Pipeline William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 60 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask daar eee eee ee ee Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R Indi % Com, ID Number _ Description = Start Finish ~~~”? 50% Client —_—Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-01 Subtask Description: ALTERNATE LOAD STUDIES 7.1.01 Determine System Requirements Ronald Beazer 7/1196 12/31/96 60 7.1.02 Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 7/1/96 12/13/96 60 7.1.03 Meeting with IPG Members Ronald Beazer 8/5/96 8/6/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-02 Subtask Description: SYSTEM OUTAGE(N-1) 7.2.01 Emergency Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 7/96 12/13/96 75 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-03 Subtask Description: DYNAMIC STABILITY 7.3.01 Dynamic Stability Analysis Ronald Beazer 7/1196 12/13/96 50 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-04 Subtask Description: SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES REPORT 7.4.01 10 Copies Draft Report Section Ronald Beazer 11/25/96 12/6/96 0 7.4.02 IPG Teleconference Ronald Beazer 12/2/96 12/9/96 0 7.4.03 Final Report Section Ronald Beazer 12/9/96 12/13/96 0 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:16AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask a Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com; ID Number —_ Description rae tite Start Finish “~~”? 50% Client _ Final Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-01 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES 8.1.01 Hydrographic Rpt Bottom Profiles William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.1.02 One Mobilization-Hydrographic Subcontractor William Riall 6/14/96 = 8/15/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-02 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC SUPERVISION 8.2.01 Report Findings of Investigations William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.2.02 Work Log of Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.03 Field Eng Present During Hydro Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.04 Analyze Data-Hydrographic Survey William Rial! 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.2.05 Feasibility Submarine Cable Crossings William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 85 8.2.06 Assessment of Cable Embedment Opt. j William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 85 ; 8.2.07 Recommend Prelim Cable Const William Rial 10/1/96 10/14/96 30 8.2.08 Prelim Recommend-Armoring & Install William Rial! 10/1/96 10/14/96 30 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-03 Subtask Description: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 8.3.01 Geotechnical Information Summary Larry Henriksen 11/1/96 1/2/97 0 8.3.02 Review Existing Geotech Data Larry Henriksen 71196 1/2/97 5 8.3.03 Review Construction & Operations Experience Larry Henriksen 7/1196 1/2/97 0 Denverabie tracking Sy_._.n vetveranies by wubté Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID inher Senki esp indy — fas li ri as cil ae 8.3.04 Arrange For & Use Geotech Larry Henriksen 71196 1/2/97 0 8.3.05 Visit to Enstar's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 7/1196 1/2/97 0 8.3.06 Visit to Tesoro's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 71196 1/2/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-04 Subtask Description: FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 8.4.01 Summarize Field Notes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.02 Field Observations-Environ Personnel Tim Tetherow 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 70 8.4.03 Field Observations-Eng Personnel Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.04 Identify Propective Centerline Locations Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 60 8.4.05 Identify Potential Mitigation Methods Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 ~—-8/15/97 76 8.4.06 Identify Most Appropriate Structure Types Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.07 Select Submarine Cable Landfall Locations William Riall 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 80 8.4.08 Identify Tech or Environmental Challenges Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 70 8.4.09 Note Other Observed Features Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.10 Fixed Wing Aircraft Overflight-ID'd Routes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.11 3 Days Helicopter Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.12 9 Days on Ground Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 70 8.4.13 Detailed Field Review/Alternatives in Table 1 Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 ~—- 8/15/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-05 Subtask Description: SUMMARY OF FIELD REPORT 8.5.01 Copies of Summary Field Report Michael Walbert 10/15/96 2/13/98 15 Detverable tracking System Detiverz 3 by subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indi % Com ID Number Description Pp mneny Start Finish ° , 50% Client Final 8.5.02 Prelim Submarine Cable Recommendations William Riall 6/14/96 =. 2/13/98 15 8.5.03 Observations & Conclusions Impacting Project William Riall 6/14/96 2/13/98 15 w POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System . Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Feb 13,1997 11:17AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates i % Com ID Number _ Description heap indi. Start Finish “~~”? 50% Client —_ Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-07 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DESIGN-SUBSTATIONS 9.07.01 One-Line and General Arrangement Drawings Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.07.02 Modify Existing General Arrangement Plans Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.07.03 Identify & Note Bus Connct & Phasing on DWGS Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.07.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maintenance . Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-08 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRTRIA-REACT 9.08.01 Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-09 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-REACITVE COMP 9.09.01 Modify One Lines and General Arrangements Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 0 9.09.02 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-10 Subtask Description: COST EST-SUBMARINE CABLES 9.10.01 Cost Estimates William Riall 115/97 5/14/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Ci ID Number Description a Start Finish _—— 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-13 Subtask Description: COST EST-REACTIVE COMPENSATION 9.13.01 Cost Estimate Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 = 5/14/97 0 9.13.02 Compile/Review Vendor Support Data Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-14 Subtask Description: COST EST-R O W ACQUISITION 9.14.01 3 Identified Alternative Routes Cost Estimates Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.02 Develop Land Costs Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.03 Develop Labor/Exp Costs to Acquire Easements Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-01 Subtask Description: MANUFAC/UTIL SITE VISIT-SUBMAR 9.01.01 Manufacturer & Factory Inspections William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.02 Utility Specific Operating Data William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.03 1- 7 Day Trip for 2 people to Denmark William Rial 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-02 Subtask Description: PRELIM DESIGN & SPEC-SUB CABLE 9.02.01 Preliminary Design Parameters William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 0 9.02.02 Preliminary Performance Specs William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 0 9.02.03 Determine Const/Operation/Main Requirements William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R % Com ID Number —_ Description a Start Finish “~~” ”P 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-03 Subtask Description: SUMMARY CABLE REPORT 9.03.01 10 Copies of Summary Report William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.02 Recommend Specific Cable Type William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.03 Recommend Most Probable Method of Installation William Riall 2/3/97 4115/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-04 Subtask Description: SUBMARINE/LAND CBL TRAN SITES 9.04.01 Preliminary Site Specific Arrangements William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.02 Engineering Sketches of Transition Station William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.03 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/10 Sub CBL Landfalls William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.04 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/2 Transiton Sites William Riall 1/1197 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-05 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-O H LINE 9.05.01 Preliminary Design for Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 5 9.05.02 Prel DSGN for DBL Circuit Single Pole Structures Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 5 9.05.03 Est/Dist Underbuilt to Single Pole Struct Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 5 9.05.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 5 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-06 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRIT-SUBSTAT 9.06.01 Site Visits Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 8/30/96 100 9.06.02 Data Acquisition/Drawing Collection Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 10/15/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Lenveranies by oubtasn “Project: 12037609 TASK9PRELIMENGINEERING Client: CHUGACHELECTRICASSOCIATION.——SOSOSOS~S~S Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID aoe — cea renee nety oo“ rich % Comp a sr ‘fa 9.06.03 Schedule and Attend Meetings Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 9.06.04 Provide Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 80 9.06.05 One Mobilization/Office Visit Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-11 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-O H LINE 9.11.01 Cost Estimates guyed "X" Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.02 Cost Estimates Single Stl Pole Single Circuit Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.03 Cost Estimates Wood Pole H-Frame . Larry Henriksen 1115/97 = 5/14/97 25 9.11.04 Cost Estimates DBL Circuit Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.05 Cost Est Addition of Underbuilt to Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 = 5/14/97 25 9.11.06 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 = §/14/97 25 9.11.07 Summary Cost Report Larry Henriksen 4/15/97 = 5/14/97 25 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-12 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-SUBSTATIONS 9.12.01 Cost Estimate for 2 New Endpoints Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 = 5/14/97 0 9.12.02 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 = 5/14/97 0 9.12.03 Summary Cost Report Stanley Sostrom 4/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-23-09-15 Subtask Description: SUMMARY COST REPORT 9.15.01 15 Copies Summary Reports Michael Walbert 4115/97 5/14/97 0 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 2-08-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 SCOPING Actual % Work Completed na 5%| 20% 28%) 338%) S1% 72%| ss 77% 93% We | Wh Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 2% 25% 26% 33% 52% 74% 87% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100%] 100%]. 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 30% 30% 33% 51% 63% 71 Vo Sean So | Base Planned $ (this period) $6,743 $81,045 $2,745 $25,645 $67,045 $75,045 $46,045 $23,645 $23,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $67,538 $60,112 $27,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $15,925 $89,330 ($558) $9,848 $63,340 $42,082 $67,538 $59,509 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $6,743 $87,788 $90,533 $116,178 $183,223 $258,268 $304,313 $327,958 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $287,505 $347,617 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) $15,925 $105,255 $104,697 $114,545 $177,885 $219,967 $287,505 $347,014 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $335,125 $245,795 $246,353 $236,505 $173,165 $131,083 $87,334 $27,825 2 INVENTORY | Actual % Work Completed 0% 6% 25% 45% 60% 67% 73% 80% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 5% 23% 53% 73% 83% 84% 84% 84% 84% 84% 87% 95% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73% 82% 85% 86% 86% 89% 92% 96% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 5% 24% 43% 58% 72% 73% 78% Base Planned $ (this period) $941 $29,441 $121,000 $200,500 $129,500 $69,768 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $16,500 $52,000 $34,056 $1,000 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $19,728 $58,932 $20,240 $8,817 $3,000 $17,500 $19,000 $29,613 $26,975 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $32,162 $124,454 $129,043 $100,796 $89,331 $19,728 $33,908 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $941 $30,382 $151,382 $351,882 $481,382 $551,150 $556,150 $556,150 $556,150 $556,150 $557,150 $573,650 $625,650 $659,706 $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $495,514 $554,446 $574,686 $583,503 $586,503 $604,003 $623,003 $652,616 $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $32,162 $156,616 $285,659 $386,455 $475,786 $495,514 $529,422 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $18,885 $18,885 _ $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget $660,706 $628,544 $504,090 $375,047 $274,251 $184,920 $184,077 $150,169 3. |IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING ; Actual % Work Completed 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 10% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 25% 40% 50% 60% 80% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7% 20% 37% 55% 69% 82% 89% 96% 99% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 9% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $30,000 $85,000 $90,000 $57,000 $58,000 $117,000 $90,000 $28,010 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $10,408 $81,590 $99,490 | $111,370 $88,030 $78,700 $42,295 $37,600 $18,000 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $383 $64 $0 $5,788 $23,901 $10,408 $14,998 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $59,000 $144,000 $234,000 $291,000 $349,000 $466,000 $556,000 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA] $40,544 = $122,184 $221,624] $332,994, $421,024 —$499,724| —$542,019| —$579,619| $597,619 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $383 $447 $447 $6,235 $30,136 $40,544 $55,542 | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $584,010 $583,627 $583,563 $583,563 | $577,775 $553,874 $566,068 $551,070 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 1 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 2-08-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] JUN/JUL AUG SEP ocT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION peace Actual % Work Completed 0%) OH __0% 0%) —=— 0% __0%| —s_— OK TO 7 PiiRieis HE IL Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% oe 0% 0% 0% 11% 35%! «1% iB 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 5% 15% 31% 49% 71% 91% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,400 $74,400 $77,400 $58,400 $60,875 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $35,000 $52,000 $62,000 $72,000 $69,000 $29,972 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $1,369 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 $32,400 $106,800 $184,200 $242,600 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A HI N/A N/A N/A $1,369 3 $16,369 $51,369 $103,369 $165,369 $237,369 $306,369 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 _ $1,369 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 © $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $32,866 5 _ $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,344 $336,341 $336,344 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget $303,475 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $334,972 $334,972 5 DRAFT EIS | igs Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 11% 19% 34% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 13% 32% 43% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SS $0 $5,772 $1,572 $5,772 $1,582 $31,570 $31,570 $57,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 2 $6,100 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $43,300 $78,052 $42,017 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ‘ : $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 $7,344 $13,116 $14,698 $46,268 $77,838 $135,408 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $6,100 $10,100 $10,100 $53,400 $131,452 $173,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 y Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A | N/A N/A $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 6 FINAL EIS Pia Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% (0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 2 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 2-08-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 | 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OocT NOV DEC JAN FEB | MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 7 STUDIES 2 Actual % Work Completed 1%) 5% THY T%)| 8%| _ 14% 27% 35% fe fo 2 ee Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 9% 21% 51% 73% 73% é 73% 76% 78% 80% 83% 87% 91% 91% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% - 3 * 38% 55% 56% 56% 67% 78% 89% 90% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 3% 7% 7% 8% 14% __ 27% eee Base Planned $ (this period) $927 $3,927 $4,427 $12,200 $30,325 $22,780 $0 geese S0% $2,300 $2,300 $2,280 $2,300 $4,139 $4,175 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $13,352 ae $10,492 $18,035 $500 $500 $11,156 $11,300 $11,207 $802 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $2,569 $4,177 $637 $1,148 $5,705 $13,352 © $5,455 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $927 $4,854 $9,281 $21,481 $51,806 $74,586 $74,586 $74,586 $76,886 $79,186 $81,466 $83,766 $87,905 $92,080 $92,080 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A _ N/A N/A N/A $27,588 $38,080 $56,115 $56,615 $57,115 $68,271 $79,571 $90,778 $91,580 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $2,569 $6,746 $7,383 $8,531 $14,236 $27,588 «$33,043 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA | N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget $101,480 $98,911 $94,734 $94,097 $92,949 $87,244 $73,892 $68,437 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK é Actual % Work Completed 5% 15% 50% 60% 70% 74% 77% — 79% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 5% 18% 52% 63% 68% 78% 86% — 91% 91% 91% 91% 94% 97% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77% : 79% 81% 81% 81% 88% 95% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 138% 48% 60% 70% 74% 77% __ 79% Base Planned $ (this period) $9,600 $27,600 $68,900 $20,980 $10,800 $20,680 $16,600 = $9,955 $0 $0 $0 $5,500 $5,500 $6,540 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $7,645 $4,000 j $2,601 $0 $0 | $15,000 $14,000 $10,026 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,330 $17,007 $69,770 $23,487 $20,840 $7,949 $7,645 $2,827 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $9,600 $37,200 $106,100 $127,080 $137,880 $158,560 $175,160 $185,115 $185,115 $185,115 $185,115 $190,615 $196,115 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $157,028 $161,028 $163,629 $163,629 $163,629 $178,629 $192,629 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,330 $27,337 $97,107 $120,594 $141,434 $149,383 $157,028 $159,855 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $192,325 $175,318 $105,548 $82,061 $61,221 $53,272 $45,627 $42,800 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING a Actual % Work Completed 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% 7 Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 2% 4% 9% 23% 31% 44% 57% 71% 88% 97% 98% 98% 98% 98% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 36% 53% 71% 85% 98% 98% 98% 98% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 7% 18% 20% Base Planned $ (this period) $2,580 $2,137 $2,137 $10,337 $27,417 $14,557 $23,697 $25,557 $26,837 __ $32,397 $16,076 $2,132 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,937 $33,000 $33,000 $35,000 $25,000 $25,330 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $1,694 $0 $1,080 $0 $20,307 $9,513 $1,937 $2,746 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned § (to date) $2,580 $4,717 $6,854 $17,191 $44,608 $59,165 $82,862 $108,419 $135,256 $167,653 $183,729 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $34,531 $67,531 $100,531 $135,531 $160,531 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,694 $1,694 $2,774 { $2,774 $23,081 $32,594 $34,531 $37,277 _| Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $188,167 $188,167 $187,087 $187,087 $166,780 $1 57,267 $155,330 $152,584 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 3 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 2-08-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| _JUN/JUL AUG SEP oct NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 Actual % Work Completed 1%| 5% 12%) 18% 24% 30%] __ 33% a li WI Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 12% 22% 31% 41% 47% 55% 60% 84% 69%! 74% 79% «8% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33% 49% 56% 62% 69% 75% 81% 84% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 6% 12% 18% 24% 30%| 33% eee Base Planned $ (this period) $20,791 | $144,150] $199,209| $298,662 $295,087| _$287,830| $181,342 $116,001 | $153,269/ $147,528] _$130,424| _$170,609| _$134,741| $119,445 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| $120,608 $235,588 | $207,687| $182,530| $219,686| $198,895| $196,470 $87,794 Actual $ Expended (this period) $27,949 | $142,820| $198,987] _$163,015| _$212,219| $178,481 | $120,608 $119, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $20,791 | $164,941 | $364,150| $662,812 | $957,899 | $1,245,729 | $1,427,071 $1,543,228 $1,659,229] $1,812,498 | $1,960,026 | $2,090,450] $2,261,059 | $2,405,800 | $2,515,245 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A M/A| $1,044,079 $1,313,305 $1,548,893 | $1,756,580 | $1,939,110) $2,158,796 | $2,357,691 | $2,554,161 | $2,641,955 Actual $ Expended (to date) $27,949 | $170,769| $369,756 | _$532,771| $744,990 | $923,471 | $1,044,079 $1,163,522 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA| $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047, _$103,047| _$103,047| $103,047| $103,047| $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470| $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget $3,015,474 | $2,872,654 | $2,673,667 | $2,510,652 | $2,298,433 | $2,119,952] $2,102,301 $1,982,948 BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $364,150 $881,579 $413,500 $431,221 $424,795 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,245,729 | REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $609,903 $483,159 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $240,051 $0 $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 4 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 2-08-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1 SCOPING Actual % Work Completed Z fe : _ a _| jo Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%] -—: 100% 100%| =: 100%. 100% 100%) 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%! 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) L Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget 2 INVENTORY Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100%: 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 z Base Planned $ (to date) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | Actual % Work Completed | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ____ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $8,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ___ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual $ Expended (to date) | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 5 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 2-08-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 | TASK MONTH ocT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR nl MAY JUN il JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION ie Actual % Work Completed Ca TEA it i ANNAN WMH Ls Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%] 100%! =: 100%|_ -100%|_ 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 = $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget DRAFT EIS Actual % Work Completed Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 50% 55% 60% 66% 85% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 59% 66% 73% 85% 92% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%| Actual % Expended $ (to date) al Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $42,570 $18,742 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $66,200 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $30,001 $1,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $(to date) $199,978 $221,548 $241,118 $266,688 $341,258 $383,828 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $239,669 $268,669 $297,669 $347,569 $375,569 $405,570 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 | $402,570 | _-$402,570| $402,570 | $402,570] —$402,570| $402,570| $402,570 _$402,570| $402,570| _$402,570| $402,570] $402,570] $402,570 | $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget $407,474 | $407,474 | _-$407,474| $407,474 | $407,474 | $407,474 | —$407,474| $407,474 | $407,474] $407,474 —$407,474| $407,474| $407,474| $407,474| $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget 6 FINAL EIS TG} Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 16% 26% 50% 60% 74% 84% 94% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17% 40% 53% 73% 86% 90% 93% 96% 98% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) wut} | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,100 $25,100 | $59,600 $25,100 $35,100 $24,600 $24,600 $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900 $55,563 $33,700 $48,065 | $33,804 $8,200 $8,700 $6,660 $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0] $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,100 | $64,200 $123,800 $148,900 $1 84,000 $208,600 $233,200 $247,616 $247,616 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900 $98,463 | $132,163 $180,229 $214,033 $222,233 $230,933 $237,593 $243,756 $247,616 Actual $ Expended (to date) ue | (ae | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget | Page 6 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 2-08-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC iz STUDIES Actual % Work Completed oe _ _ | ee | eee _ Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 96% 96%| 96%| 96%| —=-—«96% ~——968%|~=—Ss=«é‘iML~=SC*«‘«‘«‘é ON 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 100%: 100% 100% 100% | Actual % Expended $ (to date) a Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 | $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 | $92,080 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Oe rk. _-er— OO FF | | Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) L Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING —_—_—_o—_—————_—_—_——_______=::0 _—_—_—_—_—n aaa a — = eee a a ee} Actual % Work Completed Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ___$0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $1 89,361 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget Page 7 2/13/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 20697 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH oct NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP oct | NOV DEC TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 |___ Actual % Work Completed fo _ | 2 _ ee ee pO | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 85% 85% 86% 87% 89% 91% 93% 94% 96% 96% 98% 99%| 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 86% 87% 88% 90% 91% 93% 95% 96% 98% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) [ Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $47,970 $57,842 $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 $35,100 $28,600 $28,600 $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $75,193 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $78,801 $57,467 $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $12,700 $10,660 $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,579,815 | $2,601,385 | $2,620,955 | $2,646,525 | $2,721,095 | $2,769,065 | $2,826,907 | $2,852,007 | $2,911,607] $2,936,707 | $2,971,807 | $3,000,407 | $3,029,007 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $2,717,148 | $2,746,148 |_ $2,775,148 |_ $2,825,048 | $2,853,048 | $2,931,849 | $2,989,317 | $3,023,017 | $3,071,082 | $3,104,886 | $3,113,086 | $3,125,786 | $3,136,446| $3,142,609 | $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423] $3,043,423] $3,043,423] $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | _ $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470| $3,146,470| $3,146,470| $3,146,470| $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $105,710 $148,110 $142,542 $88,300 $43,016 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,375,226 $422,468 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $133,193 $156,701 $139,233 $54,704 $20,683 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,851,677 $371,321 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $240,051 $0 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 8 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. February 17, 1997 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service 3301 C. Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Attention: Mr. Larry L. Hudson, Forest Supervisor Subject: Southern Intertie Project - Collection Agreement CEA Contract #96-265 - Amendment #1 USFS #96CC-10-04-023 Dear Mr. Hudson: Enclosed find three original copies of subject collection agreement amendment #1 signed by Chugach’s General Manager, Gene Bjornstad. Please, forward one copy of the agreement once it is fully executed for our files. If you have any questions, please call me at 762-4601, or fax to 562-0027 or e-mail at dora_gropp@ chugachelectric.com. Sincerely, bova 2. Ay Dora L. Gropp, P.E. Manager, Transmission DLG/ahw (C:ANNALISA\WPDOCHE9S9008 FH IBUSPSG.LTR Enclosures: Collection Agreement Amendment #1 (3 copies). CH Eugene Bjornstad Fred Prange, USFS, w/o Randy Pollock, w/o Tim Tetherow, w/ CW.04E9590081, Sec:, 73.1 ~ RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 Thursday, February 13, 1997 04:45:11 AM Chugach National Forest FINANCIAL PLAN SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT INTERIM PHASE COLLECTION AGREEMENT 96CC-10-04-023 The estimated project cost to the Cooperator of $29,684 is broken down as follows: Personnel Costs DAYS Cost/Day Total Cost Cultural Resources 5 $277 $1,385 Fishenes Biologist 3 $252 $756 Forest Project Coordinator 20 $277 $5,540 Geologist 2 $221 $442 GIS Coordinator C3 $226 $452 GIS Staff 5) $211 $1,055 Hydrologist 3 $246 $738 Lands Specialist 4 $267 $1,068 Landscape Architect 5 $269 $1,345 NEPA Coordinator 4 $274 $1,096 Public Affairs 5 $150 $450 Recreation Specialist 3 $269 $807 Staff Officers a $320 $960 Wildlife Biologist Ss $277 $1,385 OGC 2 $380 $760 RO Staff 2 $350 $700 Total Personnel Costs $18,939 Travel/Transportation and related costs Co-lead Travel $4,000 Meeting and Site Inspections $500 Equipment None Identified $0 Supplies | None Identified $0 Other Direct Costs Computer Time $500 Indirect Costs Overhead cost at 24% $5,745 TOTAL INTERIM COST $29,684 Subsequent Calculations And Deposits Page 1 of 1 CEA Contract #96-265 Amendment #1 Revised 02/13/97 4:39 PM Revision of this Financial Plan and additional deposits will occur when the account balance drops below $500 or the evaluation progresses to levels requiring more involvement from the Forest Service. For the FOREST SER VICE For the Intertie Participants Group Frei. yo th LARRY L. HUDSON Date Ze oe EL Forest Supervisor Lepy 02/13/97 THU 16:43 [TX/RX NO 6759] eee, ' UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY not REGION 10 meh 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 February 14, 1997 Reply To Attn Of: ECO-088 Ref: 96-076-RUS Mr. Nurul Islam Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 1571 Washington, DC 20250-1571 Dear Mr. Islam: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southern Intertie Project in accordance with our responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. We appreciate the opportunity for early involvement in this project. Based on the information presented in the NOI and at the meeting we attended in November, we would like to take this opportunity to highlight the topic areas that EPA believes warrant explicit treatment and discussion in the EIS. 1. Purpose and Need - It is essential that a clear statement of the purpose and need be defined for the proposed project, as it provides the foundation for the analyses to be conducted. We believe that to make early input into the project truly meaningful, the purpose and need is best included in the NOI. Information provided to us indicates that the Intertie Participants Group (IPG) is proposing to construct and operate a 230 kV transmission line between Anchorage and a location on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska, yet we have been unable to determine the underlying need for the transmission line. Is the intertie needed to alleviate existing power shortages? Is the intertie needed to meet projected power shortfalls in the near or distant future? A clearly defined need for the project is essential in developing a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate, as well as determining the nature of the analyses to be conducted. The EIS should include a clearly stated purpose and need for the project, along with sufficient information to support it. We would appreciate information related to the purpose and underlying need for the project prior to issuance of the draft EIS to allow us the opportunity to provide meaningful input as the analyses for the proposed project are developed. 2. Existing Transmission Line/Pipeline Corridors - For those proyect alternatives that consider potential intertie routes, we strongly recommend the use of existing transmission line and pipeline corridors. The use of existing corridors would minimize the impacts to presently undisturbed areas with high resource and aesthetic values. GD printed on Recycied Paper Range of Alternatives - We are pleased to see that RUS is intending to evaluate energy conservation, local generation, system, and transmission alternatives, in addition to intertie corridor routes, in the EIS. Assuming that the intertie proposal is based on present and/or projected power shortfalls within the areas serviced by the members of the IPG, we believe that the EIS should rigorously evaluate alternative means of providing the power needed by end-users. Stormwater - Please be advised that under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the EPA is required to establish National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements for storm water discharges associated with all construction activities involving five (5) or more acres of exposed soil. Construction activities include, but are not limited to, land clearing, grading, and excavation. The proposed intertie corridor would exceed this five acre threshold. Therefore, a Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted to the EPA in order to gain coverage under the NPDES Storm Water General Permit (GP). A NOI should be submitted at least two (2) days prior to the beginning of the construction activity. In addition, each construction activity covered by the GP must develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, tailored to the site specific conditions, and designed with the goal of preventing or minimizing the amount of pollutants in storm water discharges from the project. Enclosure 1 contains a Storm Water Program Package, which includes a NOI for Storm Water Discharges associated with Industrial Activity under the NPDES GP. Wetlands - In order for decision-maker and the public to understand potentially significant impacts to waters of the United States, including wetlands, from construction of the project, the draft EIS should include an identification of wetland types, acreage, and location, and an assessment of wetland functions and values. This information should be provided for impacts associated with intertie right of way alternatives. All construction activities should avoid high resource wetlands (particularly A and B wetlands in Anchorage, and wetlands in the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge) to the maximum extent practicable. All unavoidable wetland impacts should be minimized by strict implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The EIS should provide a discussion of the proposed BMPs to be implemented and monitoring proposed to demonstrate their effectiveness. : , - Aesthetics - Because preliminary investigations have identified potential intertie routes through near-wilderness settings, we strongly recommend that project alternatives include design elements that would eliminate or minimize the adverse effects to the aesthetic qualities of those areas. We believe that one way of minimizing such impacts would be underground placement of transmission lines for.intertie alignment alternatives through aesthetically sensitive areas. Evaluation of potential aesthetic impacts should be included in the EIS. ds Relationship to the Northern Intertie Project - Because the completion of both the Southern and Northern Intertie Projects would result in an electrical network extending from Fairbanks to the Kenai Peninsula, we believe that the EIS should provide a discussion of the interrelationship between the two projects, the anticipated operation of the completed network, and any impacts associated with operation of the electrical network. : Thank you for providing this opportunity for early involvement in this project. Should you have any questions about our comments, please feel free to contact me at (206) 553-8561 or Phil North in our Anchorage office at (907) 271-3401. Sincerely, Willa M bye William M. Ryan Environmental Review Team Enclosure ce: Dora Gropp, Chugach Electric Association, Inc. 02/18/97 TUE 13:35 FAX 7624693 CEA ENGINEERING @oo1 EELEKEAAAKAAASERERAAKKASSAKKEK SEE MULTI TX/RX REPORT REE SKKEAKEAKKREKSSERESRAKKTKSAKKSEH TX/RX NO 4471 INCOMPLETE TX/RX TRANSACTION OK (1) 912087882082 (2) 95621297 ERROR . . Caney Pyllok. 08 KE tia omy, hikesKarbe- 209 - AG is } UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY “ REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 February 14, 1997 Reply To . / Atm Of ECO-088 Ref: 96-076-RUS Mr. Nurul Islam Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 157 1 Washington, DC 20250-1571 Dear Mr. Islam: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southern Intertie Project in accordance with our responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. We appreciate the opportunity for early involvement in this project. Based on the information presented in the NOI and at the meeting we attended in November, we would like to take this opportunity to highlight the topic areas that EPA believes warrant explicit treatment and discussion in the EIS. 1. Purpose and Need - It is essential that a clear statement of the purpose and need be defined for the proposed project, as it provides the foundation for the analyses to be conducted. We believe that to make early input into the project truly meaningful, the purpose and need is best included in the NOI. Information provided to us indicates that the Intertie Participants Group (IPG) is proposing to construct and operate a 230 kV transmission line between Anchorage and a location on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska, yet we have been unable to determine the underlying need for the transmission line. Is the intertie needed to alleviate existing power shortages? Is the intertie needed to meet projected power shortfalls in the near or distant future? A clearly defined need for the project is essential in developing a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate, as well as determining the nature of the analyses to be conducted. The EIS should include a clearly stated purpose and need for the project, along with sufficient information to support it. We would appreciate information related to the purpose and underlying need for the project prior to issuance of the draft EIS to allow us the opportunity to provide meaningful input as the analyses for the proposed project are developed. 02/18/97 TUE 15:50 FAX 7624693 CEA ENGINEERING @oo1 SEARLE RASERKAEKERS ae -TX REPORT ERE RELEREKERSERRSER SKK TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 4475 CONNECTION TEL 95621297 CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 02/18 15:49 USAGE T 01'34 PGS. 3 RESULT OK Fee . plekles Kate is i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Eerie Wier — 1200 Sixth Avenue JOTF. Seattle, Washington 98101 Sto2-/ ae es February 14, 1997 Reply To ; Attn OF: ECO-088 Ref: 96-076-RUS Mr. Nurul Islam Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 1571 Washington, DC 20250-1571 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southern Intertie Project in accordance with our responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. We appreciate the opportunity for early involvement in this project. Based on the information presented in the NOI and at the meeting we attended in November, we would like to take this opportunity to highlight the topic areas that EPA believes warrant explicit treatment and discussion in the EIS. 1. Purpose and Need - It is essential that a clear statement of the purpose and need be defined for the proposed project, as it provides the foundation for the analyses to be conducted. We believe that to make early input into the project truly meaningful, the purpose and need is best included in the NOI. Information provided to us indicates that the Intertie Participants Group (IPG) is proposing to construct and operate a 230 kV transmission line between Anchorage and a location on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska, yet we have been unable to determine the underlying need for the transmission line. Is the intertie needed to alleviate existing power shortages? Is the intertie needed to meet projected power shortfalls in the near or distant future? A clearly defined need for the project is essential in developing a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate, as well as Antncmninina thn andeeen affable 2221-1 te eee dee one