Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S Intertie report 3-1997
ugach kectric ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 196300 * ANCHORAGE, AK 99519-6300 CHUGACH ELECTRIC Yj N ASSOCIATION, INC. ectric ASSOCIATION, INC. March 27, 1997 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority 480 West Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 Attention: Mr. Randy Simmons, Executive Director Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Dear Mr. Simmons: Please find enclosed 1 (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for the Month of March 1997. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. We have modified the financial reports to comply with grant audit requirements. Enclosures: | (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report c: Lee Thibert Joe Griffith Michael Massin Dora Gropp John Cooley Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.0.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * PO. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Report for the Month of MARCH 1997 Il. Ii. Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARYS isiaterie erect oisusiaiels + lols) of stetietretelele) lll ol «\eleitemens}ie)iars I-1 FINANCIAT i tneienclete kel ole ol stelcieleveletsle/ at oherersielelerele ele ch eleierskeneneliols II-1 1 Total Project Expenditures as of January 1997 25 Chugach Statement for January 1997 Be Bank Statement of February 1997 SCH DU a orastayrasroutectosts to trereo eter ao) curst opto se eos oto! 01 oniestoriolte (oiiess so excucice stick Iil-1 ITEMS) RORVAPPROVAL 3% cae sic ccc si asicicisic)s sins cis = Iv-1 1. Update of the 1990 Economic Feasibility Study (Decision Focus) Ds Update of 1990 Reliability Study (NERC) 3: Memorandum of Understanding with Federal Lead Agencies for Preparation of the EIS TTEMS FOR®DISCUSSION ooze efor oo oirores cnet ot oie ooo) cfielielonel chee etoiey eh er sro s' V-1 None TTEMS KORTINEORMA TION oreo es siersuersis/suoreroues chee: serene elalsrsvererers VI-1 1. Power Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, March 14, 1997 ii Report for the Month of March 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 I. SUMMARY The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the federal lead agencies (RUS, USFS, USFWS) and the “applicant” (Chugach Electric on behalf of the IPG) has been finalized and is presented for approval. The MOU essentially delineates responsibilities for the EIS preparation and includes a Workplan and a schedule. Dames and Moore is selected to prepare the EIS under the direction of the lead agencies RUS, USFWS and USFS. The Scoping Report (draft) has been submitted to the agencies for approval. This report will become the basis for the EIS preparation and will be distributed to all IPG members and placed in public libraries when finalized in May 1997. The scoping process revealed many questions in regard the “Purpose and Need” for the project making it necessary to update the underlying documents, such as the economic feasibility study performed by Decision Focus and the reliability assessment done by NERC in 1990. Approval is requested to add an update of these studies to Dames and Moore’s (EIS Preparer) scope of work. The Consultant’s schedule now shows the effects of delays encountered in bringing the federal agencies together in the scoping, inventory and impact assessment tasks, standing at 42% completion compared to 53% planned. Review of the overall schedule still allows for filing of the draft EIS in early 1998 if no further delays will occur. Community Working Group meetings were held March 3, 1997 in Kenai and March 5, 1997 in Anchorage with the main task being assignment of importance and sensitivity to project impacts. Budget Status DESCRIPTION POWER USFS/USFWS CHUGACH ENGINEERS BUDGET $3,043,423.00 $100,000.00 $400,000.00 | $3,543,423.00 $251,295.30 ALLOCATED $201,295.30 $10,000.00 $40,000.00 CONTINGENCY $3,244,718.30 $110,000.00 $440,000.00 | $3,794,718.30 AMENDMENTS $103,047.00 $103,047.00 I-1 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 DESCRIPTION POWER USFS/USFWS CHUGACH TOTAL ENGINEERS TOTAL COMMITMENT $3,347,765.30 $110,000.00 | $440,000.00 | $3,897,765.30 INVOICED TO DATE $1,328,721.00 $5,270.00 | $58,085.00 | $1,392,076.00 % OF TOTAL 39.69% 13.20% Note: ”Invoiced to Date” shows charges received (not yet accrued) and accrued as of March 18, 1997. An independent audit of the project has been performed for 1996 by KPMG Peat Marvick in accordance with the requirements of Section 5 of the Grant Administration Agreement. The audit will be submitted to the State of Alaska, Department of Administration through AIDEA prior to April 15, 1997. 1-2 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Southern Intertie Transactions Inception Through January 31, 1997 Project Expenditures Month Through Ended Inception 12/31/96 1/31/97 Through 1/31/97 Direct Labor $68,678.93 $2,712.94 $71,391.87 Indirect Labor 23,471.09 1,194.21 24,665.30 Power Engineers 1,918,877.36 (43,041.43) (1) 1,875,835.93 Miscellaneous 30,326.81 274.58 30,601.39 Total $2,041,354.19 ($38,859.70) $2,002,494.49 (1) Reversal of year-end invoice accrual. Actual payment made in February. Grant Fund Expenditures Month Through Ended Inception 12/31/96 1/31/97 Through 1/31/97 Direct Charges that Chugach has Reimbursed for $1,433,087.47 $234,735.50 (2) $1,667,822.97 Plus General, Administrative & Construction Overhead 7,165.42 1,173.68 (2) 8,339.10 Total Amounts Paid to Chugach $1,440,252.89 $235,909.18 (2) _$1,676,162.07 (2) Chugach January 8, 1997 invoice for November, 1996 charges. CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska March 20, 1997 TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Kimberly Pond, Plant Accountant yf SUBJECT: 9590081 - Southern Intertie Route Selection Study You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Southern Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occured during January 1997, except where noted. Direct Labor 3,120.64 Indirect Labor 1,194.21 Prepaid Ticket Expense (Nov & Dec 96 charges) 237.00 Phil Steyer Expense Report 100.58 Superior Logistics Invoce # 1559 52.50 Superior Logistics Invoce # 1592 52.50 Ridgway's Invoice # 198161 219.42 Arctic Cad Invoice # 7682 69.00 Sub-Total $5,045.85 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) 25.23 Total Charges $5,071.08 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As you requested, I'll keep the original in my files. Concur: boa x. fxp 3[L0/9 Signatu Dat KP/kp WOfiles/E9590081 Attachments eceiy iH MAR 29 1997 Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary AEERSAMES ION & SIAC at REY February, 1997 SPECIAL PROVES $1,639,693.68 January Ending Balance forward $1,639,693.68 Total Deposits $0.00 Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for December charges) ($308,200.44) Interest Earned $6,192.35 Balance February 28, 1997 $1,337,685.59 CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT Perel w sre of Anchorage Account Number: 0110 606 1 Member FDIC Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Feb 28 1997 Pog: 1 of 2 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC SOUTHERN INTERTIE GRANT FUND PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 FIRSTLINE: (907) 265-4700 BRANCH: MAIN BRANCH (907) 265-3525 aol ACcount! SUmmary o<~<-n<<SaSees Se ekwesee Hm aeeaeSeocneweween =< PREVIOUS BALANCE AS OF 01/31/97 $.00 Service Charge This Month $.00 38 Deposits & Other Credits $28,756,023. 18 Interest Paid This Month $.00 20 Checks and Other Debits $28,756,023. 18 CURRENT BALANCE AS OF 02/28/97 $.00 Balance Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance Date -00 02/03 -00 02/10 -00 02/18 -00 02/25 -00 02/04 .00 02/11 -00 02/19 -00 02/26 -00 02/05 -00 02/12 -00 02/20 -00 02/27 -00 02/06 -00 02/13 -00 02/21 -00 02/28 -00 02/07 -00 02/14 -00 02/24 SSS Rate SERN a Pest KR Naan aS Ske mweeeseesqan= Other Credits -<---ccen ones eens ocee seen ncececscceccosoncore Amount Date Description , 639,693.68 02/03 REPO CREDIT TAT SOT 02/03 REPO INTEREST 1,640,411.05 02/04 REPO CREDIT 236.04 02/04 REPO INTEREST ,640,647.09 02/05 REPO CREDIT 236.07 02/05 REPO INTEREST 1,640,883. 16 02/06 REPO CREDIT 236.10 02/06 REPO INTEREST ,641, 119.26 02/07 REPO CREDIT 236.14 02/07 REPO INTEREST 641,355.40 02/10 REPO CREDIT 708.52 02/10 REPO INTEREST *,642,063.92 02/11 REPO CREDIT 237.64 02/11 REPO INTEREST + 642,301.56 02/12 REPO CREDIT 237.68 02/12 REPO INTEREST 1,642,539.24 02/13 REPO CREDIT 237/..74 02/13 REPO INTEREST »642,776.95 02/14 REPO CREDIT 237.75 02/14 REPO INTEREST 1,643,014.70 02/18 REPO CREDIT 951.12 02/18 REPO INTEREST . 335,765.38 02/19 REPO CREDIT 191.46 02/19 REPO INTEREST 1,335,956.84 02/20 REPO CREDIT 191.49 02/20 REPO INTEREST » 336,148.33 02/21 REPO CREDIT 191.51 02/21 REPO INTEREST + 336,339.84 02/24 REPO CREDIT 574.63 02/24 REPO INTEREST 1,336,914.47 02/25 REPO CREDIT 192.74 02/25 REPO INTEREST 1997; 107020 02/26 REPO CREDIT 192.77 02/26 REPO INTEREST 1,337,299.98 02/27 REPO CREDIT CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT Account Number: 0110 606 1 Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Feb 28 1997 Page: 220f 2 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC CYCBI O8C 5997 a CI we emia oe or ee oe coe Other Credits ----------- =< Ses SS Oe ee Amount Date Description 192.79 02/27 REPO INTEREST 1,337,492.77 02/28 REPO CREDIT 192.82 02/28 REPO INTEREST ee ee rae me ae ae ae oe ae <== SS <— = Other Debits -----------eece------- SSeS es eae a ——— Amount Date Description 1,640,411.05 02/03 REPO DEBIT » 640,647.09 02/04 REPO DEBIT +640, 883.16 02/05 REPO DEBIT »,641,119.26 02/06 REPO DEBIT 1,641,355.40 02/07 REPO DEBIT *,642,063.92 02/10 REPO DEBIT » 642,301.56 02/11 REPO DEBIT »642,539.24 02/12 REPO DEBIT 1,642,776.95 02/13 REPO DEBIT 1,643,014.70 02/14 REPO DEBIT 308,200.44 02/18 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION - DRAFT 335,765.38 02/18 REPO DEBIT ., 335,956.84 02/19 REPO DEBIT 1,336, 148.33 02/20 REPO DEBIT *, 336,339.84 02/21 REPO DEBIT 336,914.47 02/24 REPO DEBIT »337,107.21 02/25 REPO DEBIT 1,337,299.98 02/26 REPO DEBIT 1,337,492.77 02/27 REPO DEBIT . 337,685.59 02/28 REPO DEBIT ‘ut your equity to work. Our HomeFlex Equity Line has two interest rate options in one program plus the nterest paid may be up to 100% tax-deductible. Apply at any branch. FNBA is an equal housing lender. Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 Il. SCHEDULE II-1 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE 3/19/97 PHASE IB 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID | Task Name % Comp. Act.Cost__| Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 } Q4 | QM | Q2] Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4/ QI 1 ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEE 37% | $2,307,875.32 : wes s 2 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 15% $60,004.80 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUD 100% | $871,650.00 4 / EIS & PREL.ENGINEERIN 37% | $1,376,220.52 5 SCOPING 91%] $420,861.08 6 INVENTORY 84% $590,936.62 7 IMPACT/MITIGATION 15% $96,945.66 8 ALTERN.SELECTION 0% $1,392.08 9 DRAFT EIS 0% $0.00 10 FINAL EIS 0% $0.00 "1 STUDIES 47% $50,297.46 12 ENG.FIELD WORK 84% | $170,221.89 6/14 emanations 8/16 13 PREL. ENGINEERING 24% $45,565.73 8/1 ss 916. Task | Summary ey Rolled Up Progress Project: ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTE ST | Date: 3/19/97 Progress Rolled Up Task Milestone e Rolled Up Milestone > C:\WINPROJ\SOUTHTIE\PH_IB.MPP Page 1 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 IV. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL 1. Update of Economic Feasibility Study 2s Update of Reliability Assessment Letter of March 11 with all enclosures 3. Lead Agency MOU Letter of March 19 with enclosures CHUGACH ELECTRIC a ASSOCIATION, INC. iN ee | ‘cima 9 March 11, = Anchorage Municipal Light and Power 1200 East First Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attention: Mr. Tom Stahr, General Manager Subject: Southern Intertie, EIS Process Purpose and Need for the Project Dear Mr. Stahr: Enclosed is a letter from our consultants, Power Engineers, and EPA addressing the scoping issues for the project. The scoping report cannot be finalized until we propose a method to respond to these issues. Power Engineers proposes to address concerns voiced in regard to the “Purpose and Need” (P&N) by having Decision Focus review and update the 1990 feasibility study and NERC to do the same for the reliability assessment. This approach appears the most cost effective way to satisfy the requirement. The budget for the EIS process for the Southern Intertie includes $220,000 to address these issues. We ask that you review the letters and be prepared to address approval to update the respective studies at the next IPG meeting on March 25,1997. i Eugene a aaa General Manager ENG: cahw Enclosures: c: Lee Thibert Mike Massin W.O. E9590081, Sec., 2.1.2.1 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 “ONT. BY: 3-10-97 ; 14:55 ; POWER ENGINFERS~ 907 562 0027:# 2/ 7 FE UOMER i TN j oy 5 3 March 10, 1997 ee — aT i MAR 10 iS5) Dora Gropp Project Manager Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive Anchorage, AK 99519-6300 Subject: 120376-01 EIS Preparation - Review of Economic Benefit and Reliability Studies Dear Dora, As you will recall, in April 1996 we discussed updating the Decision Focus, Inc. cost/benefit study for the Southern Intertic Project, so that we would have up to date information with which to prepare the EIS. You directed me to contact qualificd firms to conduct such an update, and at thut time I did contact Decision Focus and Economic and Engineering Services regarding this subject. Subsequently, you decided not to update the study at that time, but rather to wait and see if such an update would be required. Since that timc the Project has progressed through the scoping proccss with the agencies and public, and we are currently completing the Scoping Report, which outlincs the studies required to provide a basis for completion of the EIS documentation. The Scoping Report is subject to the approval of the co-lead agencies, so it must address public and agency concerns regarding the Project. As a result of comments from the public and agencies regarding the Purpose and Need (P&N) for the Project, it has become abundantly clear that a solid foundation for setting forth the PEN for the Project in the EIS is critical. As an example of the type of comments we have received, J have attached a letter received from the EPA, in which they emphasize the importance of the P&N to the Project. RUS has also emphasized the importance of the P&N on numerous occasions. The P&N for the Project-is based on two factors: e Improve the clectrical transfer capability of the transmission system between the Kenai Peninsula and Anchorage area to more economically use existing generalion resources, reducc clcctrical system instability, and reduce system load shedding requirements in case of system disturbance; and e Increase reliability of the power supply to customers on the Kenai Peninsula and in the Anchorage area by providing a second path for the power during an interruption on the existing Quartz Creek Line. MILY 23.079 POWER Engineers, Incorporated . Fn sy ene ee TR SEL 8940 Glenbrook Dr. = P.O. Box L066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey, Jduno 83333 Pax (208) 788-2082 \T BY: 3-10-97 ; 14:56 ; POWER ENGINFERS- 907 562 0027;# 3/ 7 Chugach Electric Association March 10, 1997 Page 2 So the drivers for the Southern Intertic Project (SIP) are economics (cost savings) and improvements in reliability. Two of the past studies that form the current basis for justifying the P&N for the Project include: e “Economic Feasibility of the Proposed !38kV Transmission Lines in the Railbelt”, Decision Focus, Inc., April 1990. e “Reliability Assessment of the Railbelt Interconnected Electric Utility Systems of the Alaska Systems Coordinating Council, 1990-1999”; NERC, March 16, 1990. Because these two factors are so central to the justification for the Project, we must make certain that our basis for citing economics and reliability as the P&N for the Project is very solid. Additionally, in the EJS. we will need to name a specific individual as a “Preparer” for each area covered by the FIS. This means that for the economic benefit analysis, we will need to have an individual from Decision Focus, Inc. represent their 1990 study; and have an individual from NERC represent their 1990 reliability analysis. In the process of adopting these studies, the Preparers will need to be given the opportunity to review the respective studies, and recommend any updates to make the studics acceptable for inclusion by reference in the 1998 EJS for thc SIP. In cach casc, Decision Focus, Inc. and NERC will need to examine the underlying assumptions of the studies to determine if they are stil] valid, or what limitations might apply to their conclusions. As part of their review, the Preparers should identify any data gaps or the need to update assumptions or information in order for them to “adopt” the analyses as EIS “Preparers”. Subsequent to the Preparer revicw, we can evaluate their recommendations to determine if we agree that any update studies are justified, and to what extent. Our expcricnce on other similar projects has taught us that the P&N for a project is onc of the most critical areas to focus on in preparation of the EIS documentation. Critics of the Project will focus first on the P&N, and sccondly on other issues. Over the past few months, we have'seen that this is indeed what has occurred as well for the SIP. We believe this approach will provide a solid basis for presenting the P&N in the EIS. Input from Decision Focus, Inc. and NERC is. needed by May 30, 1997 in order to maintain the current schedule. ILLY 23-079 per SENT BY: 3-10-97 ; 14:57 ; POWER ENGINFERS~ 907 562 0027:# 4/ 7 Chugach Electric Association March 10, 1997 Page 3 Please advise if you require additional information or discussion regarding this important issue. Sincerely, POWER Engineerg, Inc. Randy Pollock, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures tp/RP cc; Project Team MILY 23-079 pawey gestae za % \S g UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ; oe REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 February 14, 1997 Reply To ' Attn Of: ECO-08: Ref: 96-076-RUS Mr. Nurul Islam Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 1571 Washington, DC 20250-1571 Dear Mr. Islam: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southern Intertie Project in accordance with our responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. We appreciate the opportunity for early involvement in this project. Based on the information presented in the NOI and at the meeting we attended in November, we would like to take this opportunity to highlight the topic areas that EPA believes _ warrant explicit treatment and discussion in the EIS. 1. Purpose and Need - It is essential that a clear statement of the purpose and need be defined for the proposed project, as it provides the foundation for the analyses to be conducted. We believe that to make early input into the project truly meaningful, the purpose and need is best included in the NOI. Information provided to us indicates that the Intertie Participants Group (IPG) is proposing to construct and operate a 230 kV transmission line between Anchorage and a location on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska, yet we have been unable to determine the underlying need for the transmission line. Is the intertie needed to alleviate existing power shortages? Is the intertie needed to meet projected power shortfalls in the near or distant future? A clearly defined need for the project is essential in developing a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate, as well as determining the nature of the analyses to be conducted. The EIS should include a clearly stated purpose and need for the project, along with sufficient information to support it. We would appreciate information related to the purpose and underlying need for the project prior to issuance of the draft EIS to allow us the opportunity to provide meaningful input as the analyses for the proposed project are developed. 2; Existing Transmission Line/Pipeline Corridors - For those project alternatives that consider potential intertie routes, we strongly recommend the use of existing transmission line and pipeline corridors. The use of existing corridors would minimize the impacts to presently undisturbed areas with high resource and aesthetic values. 6 Printed on Recycled Paper Range of Alternatives - We are pleased to see that RUS is intending to evaluate energy conservation, local generation, system, and transmission alternatives, in addition to intertie corridor routes, in the EIS. Assuming that the intertie proposal is based on present and/or projected power shortfalls within the areas serviced by the members of the IPG, we believe that the EIS should rigorously evaluate alternative means of providing the power needed by end-users. Stormwater - Please be advised that under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the EPA is required to establish National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements for storm water discharges associated with all construction activities involving five (5) or more acres of exposed soil. Construction activities include, but are not limited to, land clearing, grading, and excavation. The proposed intertie corridor would exceed this five acre threshold. Therefore, a Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted to the EPA in order to gain coverage under the NPDES Storm Water General Permit (GP). A NOI should be submitted at least two (2) days prior to the beginning of the construction activity. In addition, each construction activity covered by the GP must develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, tailored to the site specific conditions, and designed with the goal of preventing or minimizing the amount of pollutants in storm water discharges from the project. Enclosure 1 contains a Storm Water Program Package, which includes a NOI for Storm Water Discharges associated with Industrial Activity under the NPDES GP. Wetlands - In order for decision-maker and the public to understand potentially significant impacts to waters of the United States, including wetlands, from construction of the project, the draft EIS should include an identification of wetland types, acreage, and location, and an assessment of wetland functions and values. This information should be provided for impacts associated with intertie right of way alternatives. All construction activities should avoid high resource wetlands (particularly A and B wetlands in Anchorage, and wetlands in the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge) to the maximum extent practicable. All unavoidable wetland impacts should be minimized by strict implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The EIS should provide a discussion of the proposed BMPs to be implemented and monitoring proposed to demonstrate their effectiveness. Aesthetics - Because preliminary investigations have identified potential intertie routes through near-wilderness settings, we strongly recommend that project alternatives include design elements that would eliminate or minimize the adverse effects to the aesthetic qualities of those areas. We believe that one way of minimizing such impacts would be underground placement of transmission lines for.intertie alignment alternatives through aesthetically sensitive areas. Evaluation of potential aesthetic impacts should be included in the EIS. 7. Relationship to the Northern Intertie Project - Because the completion of both the Southern and Northern Intertie Projects would result in an electrical network extending from Fairbanks to the Kenai Peninsula, we believe that the EIS should provide a discussion of the interrelationship between the two projects, the anticipated operation of the completed network, and any impacts associated with operation of the electrical network. . Thank you for providing this opportunity for early involvement in this project. Should you have any questions about our comments, please feel free to contact me at (206) 553-8561 or Phil North in our Anchorage office at (907) 271-3401. Sincerely, Wile. by Environmental Review Team Enclosure cc: Dora Gropp, Chugach Electric Association, Inc. CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. March 19, 1997 Alaska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc. 1018 Galena Street Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-4826 Attention: Mr. Robert Hufman, Executive Manager Subject: Southern Intertie, EIS Process Lead Agency Memorandum of Understanding Dear Mr. Hufman: Enclosed is a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to be executed between the federal lead agencies, RUS, USFWS and USFS and Chugach Electric Association on behalf of the IPG (Applicant) to facilitate preparation of the EIS for the Southern Intertie Project. The MOU includes a work plan and schedule for the process. The documents as presented have been reviewed by and agreed to by the agencies’ and Chugach staff. We will ask for authorization to sign the MOU at the upcoming IPG meeting on March 25, 1997 and ask that you are prepared to address this issue. If you have any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, Project Manager, by calling (907) 762-4626 or fax to (907) 562- 0027 or by e-mail to dora_gropp@chugachelectric.com. Sincerely, c IPG Technical Committee, w/ Lee Thibert, w/ Mike Massin, w/ Dora Gropp, w/ John Cooley, w/ Don Edwards, w/ W.O. £9590081, Sec.2.1.2.1 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 Southern Intertie Route Selection Study - Phase 1B W.0.#E9590081 Subject: Lead Agency Memorandum of Understanding Preceding letter and the following attachments were addressed and sent Federal Express to IPG Utility General Managers as follows: Alaska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc. Attention: Mr. Robert Hufman, Executive Manager 1018 Galena Street Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 cc: Mike Yerkes Anchorage Municipal Light and Power Attention: Mr. Thomas R. Stahr, General Manager 1200 East First Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 cc: Tim McConnell City of Seward Light & Power Division Attention: Mr. Dave Calvert, Utility Manager P.O. Box 167 Seward, Alaska 99664 Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System Attention: Mr. Frank Biondi, General Manager P.O. Box 72215 Fairbanks, Alaska 99707 Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc. Attention: Mr. Michael P. Kelly, General Manager P.O. Box 71249 Fairbanks, Alaska 99707 cc: Steve Haagenson Homer Electric Association, Inc. Attention: Mr. Norm Story, General Manager 3977 Lake Street ; Homer, Alaska 99603 cc: Don Stead Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. Attention: Mr. Wayne D. Carmony, General Manager P.O. Box 2929 Palmer, Alaska 99645 ce: Jim Hall LAANNALISA\WPDOCSE9S50081\MAILTECI.GM March 20, 1997 03/17/97 , MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AND CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT USFS: 9TMOU-10-04-002 USFWS: 1448-70181-97-K004 | CEA: E9590081 LE INTR P E Seven electric utilities that are collectively known as the Intertie Participants Group (IPG) have proposed to construct a new transmission line in Alaska. The IPG consists of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (Chugach); Municipality of Anchorage - Municipal Light and Power; City of Seward - Seward Electric System; Matanuska Electric Association, Inc.; the Municipality of Fairbanks - Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System; Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc. (GVEA); and Homer Electric Association, Inc. (HEA). These seven utilities are jointly identified as the Applicant. The proposal, which is referred to as the Souther Intertie Project (Proposed Project), consists of the construction and operation of a 230kV transmission line and associated facilities to be operated initially at 138kV between Anchorage and a location on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska. Chugach will act as the construction manager for the Proposed Project. Whereas Federal lands and/or Federal financing assistance may be required, the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and U.S.D.A. Forest Service (USFS) will be Co-lead Agencies (Agencies) for the NEPA process. It is the purpose of this memorandum to establish an understanding between the Agencies and Applicant regarding the conditions and procedures to be followed in preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) through a joint Applicant/Agency effort. The EIS will be prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508. In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(c), Dames and Moore is hereby selected by the Agencies to assist in preparation of the EIS and other required environmental documentation, as specified in the attached work plan, and is hereafter identified as the Preparer. The objective of this agreement is to ensure the timely preparation of an EIS that (a) satisfies the environmental review requirements of the Agencies and other applicable Federal environmental regulations and legislative requirements, and (b) includes a process to site the Proposed Project facilities in an environmentally compatible manner. The Agencies have agreed to achieve consensus on the process and pAOS200007\mou-drfttrt 1 Page 2 3/17/97 content of the EIS, and the decision-making in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. I. I. JOINT RESPONSIBILITIES o. The Agencies will prepare the EIS with the assistance of a “third-party consultant (Preparer)” according to Section 1506.5(c) and other applicable regulations. Hold public hearings on the DEIS in Washington, D.C. and Alaska. The Agencies and the Applicant, to the extent of their involvement and jurisdiction in the Proposed Project, shall: a. Actively participate in all phases of EIS preparation as specified in the attached Work Plan. The Work Plan may be modified by the Agencies in the event that action or policy changes occur which affect Proposed Project scope, or as a result of the public participation process. b. Participate in the process as appropriate with Federal, state, regional and local agencies and the public for the purpose of increasing communication and receiving comments on the EIS. c. Facilitate coordination of efforts and exchange of information. d. Designate a representative(s) to serve as the day-to-day liaison and/or contact person for this Proposed Project. e. Prepare a mailing list for distribution of project information. The Agencies will jointly assume responsibility for the following: (a) identify the significant issues to be studied, (b) identify the project alternatives to be studied and the environmentally preferred alternative, (c) direct the preparation of the EIS, (d) evaluate and approve or modify the scope and contents of the Draft EIS (DEIS) and Final EIS (FEIS), and coordinate the decision process. After the close of the DEIS review and comment period, the Agencies will (a) review the comments submitted by the public and Federal, state, and local agencies; (b) review and/or develop proposed responses to comments; and (c)approve modifications of the document. INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITIES pA09200007\mou-drft.trt 2 3/17/97 Page 3 In addition to the joint responsibilities mentioned above, the parties will have the following individual responsibilities. 1. RUS RESPONSIBILITIES The RUS will: = File the DEIS with the EPA. A public comment period of 60 days, unless otherwise designated by appropriate authority, will be initiated when EPA publishes the "Notice of Availability" in the Federal Register; = Receive all comments on the DEIS; File the FEIS with EPA. The review and comment period for the FEIS is 30 days; = = If required, review the S.F.299 Application. 2. USFWS RESPONSIBILITIES The USFWS will: = If required, review the S.F.299 Application for a ROW across National Wildlife Refuge lands under Title XI of Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). 3. USFS RESPONSIBILITIES The USFS will: = = If required, review the S.F.299 Application for a ROW Permit across Chugach National Forest lands. 4. APPLICANT RESPONSIBILITIES The Applicant: = ~=©Will in accordance with applicable laws enter into a collection agreement with the Agencies to fund the needed work. ™ ~~ -May provide data to the Agencies for their consideration in preparing the EIS. = ~The applicant will secure the services of an agency-selected preparer and, in accordance with applicable law, fund the EIS preparation and application processing. 5. EIS PREPARER RESPONSIBILITIES = = The Preparer will formulate the EIS by integrating engineering, construction, financial, pA09203\007\mou-drittrt 3 Page 4 3/17/97 technical and environmental information and analyses, as directed by the Agencies. The Preparer’s responsibility includes but is not limited to the following elements: -Prepare work plan/scoping report -Develop purpose and need statement and project description -Conduct environmental analysis and prepare DEIS -Conduct supplemental public involvement activities -Maintain project mailing list -Print and distribute copies of the EIS -Schedule public hearings -Manage the schedule IV. MODIFICATIONS AND TERMINATION 1. Each party to this MOU may terminate this agreement after 30 days prior notice, in writing, to the other parties. During the intervening 30 days, the parties agree to actively attempt to resolve any outstanding disputes and disagreements. The Applicant shall not direct the modification, inclusion or exclusion of any materials pertinent to the EIS preparation excepting the exclusion of confidential information. The Applicant recognizes the responsibility of the Agencies to comply with NEPA, to determine the necessity for preparing an EIS, to define the issues, to review and require modifications of the EIS, and to respond to the public and the Agencies' comments on the EIS. However, in executing the MOU, the Applicant reserves the right to contest, in any administrative or judicial proceedings, any adverse decision conceming the issues in the EIS or any other Federal or state requirements relating to the Proposed Project. No member of, or delegate to, Congress or Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part of this agreement, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom; but this provision shall not be construed to extend to this agreement if made with a general corporation for its general benefit. This MOU becomes effective upon the signature by the last party. It will remain in force thereafter, unless terminated. It may be subject to annual amendments, or as otherwise becomes necessary, which will outline work to be accomplished during that period. In no event will this MOU remain in effect longer than three years from its effective date. Nothing herein shall be construed as delegating the Government to expend, or as involving the United States in any contract or other obligation for the future payment of, money in excess of appropriations authorized by law and administratively allocated for this work. p\0gzoq\007\mou-defl.trt 4 Page 5S 3/17/97 During the performance of this agreement, the participants agree to abide by the terms of Executive Order 11246 on non-discrimination and will not discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The participants will take affirmative action to ensure that Applicants are employed with no regard to their race, color, religion, age, or national origin. We have read the foregoing and agree to accept the provisions herein. For the U.S. Forest Service: For the Rural Utilities Service: Date: Date: Signed: Signed: Title: Title: For the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: For Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Date: Signed: Title: for Intertie Participants Group: Date: Signed: Title: pAOS20TWO7\mou-drittrt 3) Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 V. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. V-1 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB March 27, 1997 VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION [i Power Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, March 14, 1997. VI-1 4) ay, WEG March 14, 1997 IENGINEERS Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive Anchorage, AK 99519 Subject: POWER Project #120376 EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract #95-208 Monthly Status Report No. 9 For Period Feb. 9, 1997 - March 8, 1997 Dear Dora: The following activities were performed during this invoicing period on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Preliminary Engineering portion of the Southern Intertie Project. Key Issues: The updated Project Schedule will be completed upon agreement of a final Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. In addition, the continuing development of the MOU and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. Invoice Period Overview: Preparation of scoping report Preparation of draft EIS work plan Continued revisions of MOU Continued contact with co-lead agencies Identification of two additional CWG members Resource personnel met with USFWS for biological scoping Oceanview Community Council Meeting Refining resource data Preparation of inventory data for presentations Preparation for CWG meetings Identified additional Bird Point Alternative Analysis of resource information Impact assessment criteria development Assigned resource sensitivity levels Continued work on the system studies Continued work on preliminary engineering Issued final hydrographic report PEI-HLY 23-080 POWER Engineers, Incorporated 3940 Glenbrook Dr. + Hailey, Idaho 83333 P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Fax (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association March 14, 1997 Page 2 Work Planned for the Next Invoice Period: Continue to work with the CWGs Continued preparation/organization of MOU Continued development of impact assessment criteria Continued development of resource impact assessment models Continued work on preliminary engineering Continued work on the engineering studies eoeeeee Schedule: The schedule update is dependent on the final MOU agreement. The updated schedule will include tasks to account for the Alaska National Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA) application process. An updated schedule will be issued upon completion of the MOU and Scoping Report. We are behind schedule on some of the activities but expect to be back on schedule by the end of the summer of 1997. Monthly Status Report Issues: This monthly status report contains a Project Summary Report spreadsheet to reflect the current and projected cash flows. The Project Summary Report will be reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if an update is required. Task 1 - Scoping The key issue is obtaining a final MOU agreement. Task 2 - Inventory The continuing development of the MOU and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. Task 3 - Impact Assessment/Mitigation Planning The work planned for October, November and December 1996 will be performed during December (January invoice) - June 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. PEI-HLY 23-080 game Chugach Electric Association March 14, 1997 Page 3 Task 7 - Studies Work is continuing on the writeup of the Supplemental Studies Report. Task 8 - Engineering Field Work Issued final hydrographics study report in February 1997. Conference calls to discuss submarine cable installation. Task 9 - Preliminary Engineering The work originally planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. Project Overview: Total Budget $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,328,721 Actual-Remaining Project Budget $1,817,748 Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to call me or Mike Walbert. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. DLT Randy Bollock, PE. Project Manager MW/th cc: PROJECT TEAM PEI-HLY 23-080 +) °youee SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 120376-01 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY MARCH, 1997 INVOICE Base Task 1 | Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Project Total Not to Exceed Budget $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amendment No. 4 $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 $32,866 $4,904 N/A N/A N/A N/A $103,046 Total Not to Exceed Budget Actual Budget Expended Through Previous Invoice $374,839 $347,014 $679,591 $529,422 $606,612 $55,542 $336,341 $407,474 $0 $247,616 $0 $101,480 $33,043 $202,655 $159,855 $189,861 $37,277 $3,146,469 $1,163,522 Current Invoice Amount + $25,800 $63,502 $41,883 r $0 $0 $0 $14,793 $10,789 $8,432 $165,199 Actual Budget Expended Through Current Invoice $372,814 $592,924 $97,425 $1,369 $0 $0 $47,836 $170,644 $45,709 $1,328,721 Remaining Budget PEI-HLY 23-080 $2,025 $86,667 $509, 187 $334,972 $407,474 $247,616 $53,644 $32,011 $144,152 $1,817,748 MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 1 - SCOPING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Scoping Final preparation and distribution of draft scoping report (20 copies) Final preparation and distribution of Draft EIS work plan Continued revisions of MOU based on agency comments Continued contact with co-lead agencies on MOU/scoping/work plan Identification of two additional CWG members Resource personnel met with USFWS for biological scoping Oceanview Community Council meeting KEY ISSUES: Obtaining a final MOU agreement. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($351,050 + $23,789 = $374,839). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 374,839 372,814 2,025 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-080bk 1 MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 2 - INVENTORY DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Inventory Continued refining resource data for inventory analysis Preparation of inventory data for presentation at CWG meetings and to agencies Preparation of agenda and discussion topics for CWG meetings Identified additional Bird Point alternative route KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-080bk Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. In addition, the continuing development of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. No outstanding issues. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($660,706 + $18,885 = $679,591). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 679,591 592,924 86,667 No outstanding issues. MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 3 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-080bk Impact Assessment / Mitigation Planning Began analysis of resource information Continued impact assessment criteria development Assigned resource sensitivity levels Initial development of resource impact assessment models Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. In addition, the continuing development of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and EVAL/EIS work plan has led to delayed efforts on Tasks 2 and 3 due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. Work began in December, 1996. The work planned for October, November and December, 1996 will be performed during January - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($584,010 + $22,602 = $606,612). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 606,612 97,425 509,187 No outstanding issues. MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 4 - ALTERNATIVE SELECTION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-080bk Alternative Selection e Noaction No outstanding issues. With Revision #1 we had planned to be working on task 4 during March and April. Due to the continuing development of the MOU and EVAL/EIS the start of this task has been delayed. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($303,475 + $32,866 = $336,341). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 336,341 1,369 334,972 No outstanding issues. MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 5 - DRAFT EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Draft EIS e Noaction KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($402,570 + $4,904 = $407,474). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining $407,474 00 $407,474 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-080bk 3 MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 6 - FINAL EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Final EIS e Noaction. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 247,616 00 247,616 SCOPE: ‘No outstanding issues. HLY 23-080bk 6 MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 7 - STUDIES DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-080bk Studies No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted 101,480 No outstanding issues. e The Alternate Load Studies, System Outage (N-1), and Dynamic Stability tasks are 90 percent complete. The remainder of this analysis will be performed. Work will continue on writing up the Supplemental Studies Report. $ Expended $ Remaining 47,836 53,644 MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 8 - ENGINEERING FIELD WORK DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-080bk Engineering Field Work Issued Final Hydrographics Study Report. Conference calls to discuss Submarine Cable Installation. Conference calls to discuss submarine cable installation. No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 202,655 170,644 32,011 No outstanding issues. MARCH 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 9 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-080bk Preliminary Engineering |e Continued work on preliminary design and cost estimates for overhead lines and submarine cables. No outstanding issues. The work planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 189,861 45,709 144,152 No outstanding issues. SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line 10 _| Task Name Start Finish Apr_| May | Jun aT [ Aug | Sep [ Oct [ Nov | Dec Jan | Feb [ Mar | Apr | May | Jun a [Aug [ Sep | Oct JT Nov | Dec Jan] Feb | Mar | Apr [ May | Jun a) [ Aug | Sep [ Oct [ Nov | Dec Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr 2 TASK 1 SCOPING Tuo 6/11/96 Fri 2/28/97 CN Se EE 3 FILE NOTICE OF INTENT WITH FEDERAL REGISTER Mon 7/15/96 Mon 7/15/96 | I 5 MOUs WITH GOOPERATING AND REVIEWING AGENCY Fri 11/1/96 Fri 1/3/97 EE] 7 DEVELOP BASE MAPS AND ORDER PHOTOGRAPHY Tue 6/11/96 Thu 7/11/96 Ea 9 PUBLIC/AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS - INITIAL INTERAGENCY Tue 9/3/96 Fri 11/1/96 ra MEETING 1 PREPARE MATERIALS/DEVELOP MAILING LIST Mon 7/15/96 Tue 9/3/96 ey 13 FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES AND FIELD REVIEW Mon 6/24/96 Fri 9/27/96 SE 15 DOCUMENTATION (SCOPING REPORT/PREPARATION PLAN) Mon 6/24/96 Fri 2/28/97 Fish SEIZE NE ToT TREES Se 17 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE Mon 9/30/96 Fri 1/31/97 EES) * ics — Tha 112087 SHEE OEE oo 20 INVENTORY ALTERNATIVES Tue 6/11/96 Wed 11/6/96 EE i 22 CONDUCT FIELD REVIEW AND AGENCY CONTACTS t Tue 6/11/96 Wed 10/9/96 aps ae 24 DATA MANAGEMENT Tue 8/13/96 Wed 11/27/96 BE ae 7 — — sieiaiaal 2 | 28 ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION Fri S/9/97 Thu 11/20/97 i Se eee 30 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESSEMENT AND MITIGATION PLANNING Mon 7/22/96 Mon 6/30/97 SEE | EP 4 DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION Mon 7/22/96 Fri 1178/96 EET 33 DEVELOP IA/MP Mon 10/21/96 Fri 11/8/96 f | 35 ~~ GONDUGT INITIAL [AMP Fri 11/8/96 Fri 12/6/96 a 37 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE Mon 12/9/96 Wed 1/8/97 Res) 39 FINALIZE |A/MP Mon 2/3/97 Fri 2/28/97 a i 4 DOCUMENTATION Fri 2/28/97 Mon 6/30/97 7 EE a3 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE Tue 4/1/97 Fri 4/25/97 : [ZS] critical Completion Point 45 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Tue 4/1/97 Fri 8/29/97 EEE 46 DEVELOP ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION CRITERIA Tue 4/1/97 Fri 4/18/97 , | 48 ‘CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Mon 4/21/97 Wed 5/14/97 =u 50 "AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE T Thu 5/15/97 Fri 6/13/97 [= 52 DOCUMENTATION Tue 6/17/97 Fri 8/29/97 Pres 54 Saeercn PROPONENT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Fri 6/13/97 Fri 7/18/97, Bee 86] TASKSDRAFT Els Mon 2887 si aiad Fy | SS ET 57 DEVELOP PURPOSE AND NEED Mon 2/3/97, | Wed 6/18/97 a 59 PREPARE EVAL Fri 6/20/97 ‘Sun 8/17/97 Bs 61 AGENCY REVIEW Tue 8/19/97 Sat 9/13/97 Po] | 63 FINALIZE EVAL Sat 913/97 | Mon 10/13/97 = 6 PREPARE DEIS. Tue 10/14/97 Mon 11/24/97 7 67 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE Tue 11/25/97 Fri 12/19/97 Hg i ~ PRINT DEIS — Mon 12/22/97 Fri 1/9/98 = 71 FILE WITH EPA | Wed 1/14/98 Fri 3/20/98 SEE POWER Engineers, inc. Task (Y iestone ® summary Ty Project: 120376-01 Revision #1 03/08/97 PROJECT SCHEDULE SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line 10 | Task Name Start Finish Apr_[ May | Jun aaa [ Aug J Sep J Oct [Nov JT Dec Jan | Feb [ Mar | Apr | May | Jun eo [ Aug T Sep T Oct 7 Nov | Dec Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr 7 May | Jun -_ [ Aug [ Sep [ Oct JT Nov | Dec Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr 73 DISTRIBUTE ] ‘Mon’ seen Fri 1/30/98 i 75 PUBLIC REVIEW Mon 2/2/98 T Fri 9/20/98 =e | 7 FEDERAL HEARING | Mon 2/16/98 | Wed 3/11/98 fe] 79 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Fri a720/96 | Fri 10/23/98 CLS 80 RESPOND TO COMMENTS Fia2098| Fri 4/17/98 Ey 82 PREPARE PRELIMINARY FEIS | Mon 4/20/98 Wed 5/20/98 ‘I 34 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE | Thu 5/21/98 Wed 6/10/98 Ex 86 PREPARE FEIS T Thu 611798] Fri 7/398 = 38 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE Mon 7/698 Mon 7/27/98 [5 30 PRINT Tue 7/28/98 Tue 8/18/98 Ea 92 FILE WITH EPA T Thu 8/20/98 Wed 9/2/98 ga | | 94 DISTRIBUTE | Fri 9/47/98 | Wed 9/9/98 i | | 96 PUBLIC REVIEW | Wed 9/9/98 | Fri 10/23/98 BE 98 RECORD OF DECISION | Mon 77a8| Tue 7/28/98 100 TASK 7 STUDIES Mon va Fri 2727/98 101 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM STUDIES Mon 7788 | Fri 12/13/96 106 EIS & PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS | ‘Mon TaRe] Thu 8/14/97 11 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Fri 6/14/96 | ‘Sat 8/16/97 112 HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES Fri 6/14/96 | Mon 10/14/96 115, GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Mon Tae] Thu 1/2/97 117 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS | Fri oars] ‘Sat 8/16/97 11g SUMMARY REPORT Tue 10/1 596 Fri 2/14/97 121 TASK 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING | Thu ane] Tue 9/16/97 141 PUBLIC/AGENCY INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM Wed 7/10/96 | Fri 7/31/98 cat | 142 | INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM Fri 11/1/96 Mon 7/27/98 1% 143 1D TEAM FORMULATION | Fri 11/1/96 | Fri 11/8/96 144 MEETINGS Thu 11/7/96 ‘Mon 7/27/98 11 Separate Meetings | 145 COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP (ANCHORAGE ONLY) | Mon 8/5/96 | Thu 4/24/97 146 INTERVIEWS | Mon a/5/96 Fri 30/96 | os SS | eee —_—s TTT TITTTITITKY 4 separate Mestings 1] Racer | a an CE 149 ‘SCOPING MEETINGS (3) Tue 9/3/96 Fri 11/1/96 GHIMIIMTIIM® 2 scoping Mestings 150 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE (3) (OPTIONAL) | Thu 8/1/97 Wed 5/21/97 LD 3 Public open Houses 151 PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) | ‘Mon 2/2/98 ‘Mon 3/2/98 [IMT 2 Putic Hearings 152 NEWSLETTERS/FACT SHEETS Wed 770788] Fri 7/31/98 © Tm m1 I ME I 7 To T TITTITITITITITTIT@® Nowstettorsiract shoots ! Z POWER Engineers, inc Task = I ilostone ® Sony Project: 120376-01 Revision #1 03/08/97 PROJECT SCHEDULE POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:05PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Resp Indiv Milestone Dates % Comp Scheduled Review Dates ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-01 Subtask Description: BASE MAP/PHOTOGRAPHY 1.1.01 Reproducible Map/Atlas(using quad maps) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.02 Presentation Maps(EIS/Public Meetings) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 100 1.1.03 Color Aerial Photos(1 stereo) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-A 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":500" Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-B 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":2000' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-02 Subtask Description: PUBLIC/AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS 1.2.01 File Notice of Intent with Fed Register Lead Agency 10/15/96 10/15/96 100 1.2.02 Develop MOU with Agencies Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 1/3/97 98 1.2.03 RUS Scheduled Review Times Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 1/31/97 90 1.2.04 Identify scope of issues to be addressed Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 = 12/31/96 96 1.2.05 Develop Preparation Plan Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 1/15/97 98 1.2.06 Review Preparation Plan Chugach Electric 1/15/97 1/31/97 95 1.2.07 40 Copies of Preparation Plan for ElS Tim Tetherow 2/20/97 2/28/97 0 1.2.08 Public Notification for Scoping Meetings Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.09 Conduct/Coordinate Agency Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 1.2.10 Conduct/Coordinate Public Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 24 1 Meeting Anchorage(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask “Project: 12037601 TASK1SCOPING Client: CHUGACHELECTRICASSOCIATION,—————SOSOS~S~S Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID uke Deotenee i ie fat Fa ae a et ai 1:2.42 1 Meeting Cooper Landing(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.13 1 Meeting Soldotna(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.14 Attend 1 Mtg(Anch,Cooper, Soldotna) Randy Pollock 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.15 Prepare Mat for Public/Agency Scoping Mtg Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.16 Prepare Issues/Scoping Report(documentation) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 95 1.247 Provide Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1:2.18 Update Existing Public & Agency Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.19 Review & Approve Mailing List Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.20 Newsletter # 1 (prior to scoping) Tim Tetherow 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1,2:21 Review and Approve Fact Sheet/Newsletter Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 12:22 Establish CWG in Anchorage Tim Tetherow 9/2/96 10/31/96 100 1:2:23 25 Key Informant Interviews(Anchorage) Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.24 12-15 Interviews Kenai/determine need for CWG Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.25 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 1.2.26 ID Team Meeting #1 (Scoping) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 1.2.27 50 Copies Executive Summary Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 1.2.28 20 Copies Environmental Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-03 Subtask Description: FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES 1.3.03 Review Alternatives Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 10/31/96 100 1.3.04 Field Review of Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 9/27/96 100 1.3.05 Identification of Alternatives for EIS Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv aoe % Com, . ; ID Number _ Description P Start Finish “~~”"P 50% Client _Final 1.3.06 Agency Meeting to finalize Alternatives Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-04 Subtask Description: SCOPING REPORT 1.4.01 Agency Review & Approval of Scoping Rpt Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 1/31/97 25 1.4.02 40 Copies of Scoping Report Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:07 PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Ind % Com, IDNumber _ Description speatiees Start Finish ~~ ”"P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-01 Subtask Description: DATA COLLECTION 2.1.00 ID Team Mtg(Inventory Results) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 2.1.01 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 2.1.02 Inventory of Resource Data/Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 11/6/96 95 2.1.30 CWG Mtg(Inventory/Assessement Criteria Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 2.2.01 Compile and Reproduce Inventory Maps Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 80 2.2.02 Provide Associated Data Tables by Route Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 35 2.2.03 Additional Review & Documentation Tim Tetherow 5/7/97 11/20/97 50 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-03 Subtask Description: PRIVATE LANDS/PARCEL RESEARCH 2.3.01 Identify Number of Parcels for Routes Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-A 5 Routes Anchorage Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-B Tesoro Route-Kenai Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-C Tesoro Route - Soldotna (up to 3 routes) Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-D Enstar Route Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-E Quartz Creek Route - Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask “Project: 12037602. TASK2INVENTORY ~~~ Glient: CHUGACHELECTRICASSOCIATION,————s—~S~S~S Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID Tite teats Ree ii wee hd 7 a haat 2.3.01-F Quartz Creek between Portage & University Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02 ID Owner,Size, Config sub cable landfall sites Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-A 3 Sites Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-B 5 Sites north side of Turnagain Arm Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.03 ID Owner,Size,Config of t Alternate Substn Sites Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-04 Subtask Description: RIGHT OF ENTRY 2.4.01 Provide Right of Entry for ElS Field Studies Frank Rowland 10/15/96 9/8/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-05 Subtask Description: PROPERTY SURVEY SUPPORT 2.5.01 Conduct Centerline Surveys Soldotna Area Frank Rowland 5/7197 11/20/97 0 2.5.02 Conduct Centerline Surveys Bernice Lake Area Frank Rowland 5/7/97 11/20/97 0 POWER Engineers Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:09PM Deliverable Tracking System Project: 120376-03 Project Manager: Randy Pollock Deliverable Tracking System TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Deliverables by Subtask ID Sasa? entutoe Resp Indiv cae Farieh % Comp = tan re Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-01 Subtask Description: DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIP/LOCAT 3.1.00 Develop Project Description Tim Tetherow 7/22/96 11/8/96 90 3.1.01 ID Team Review of impact criteria, results, mtg Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 3.1.02 Attend CWG Meeting(Impact Assessement) Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 100 3.1.03 IPG Review of Impacts Chugach Electric 2/14/97 2/28/97 0 3.1.04 Final Determination of Project Description Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/8/96 80 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-02 Subtask Description: CONDUCT ASSES/MITIGATION PLAN 3.2.01 IA/MP Site Specific Models Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 11/29/96 30 3.2.02 Impact Maps & Tables Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 2/28/97 5 3.2.03 Develop/Conduct IA/MPP Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 25 3.2.03-A Define:Potential Direct/Indirect/Cumltv Impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 10 3.2.03-B Define: Interrelationships(cause/effect)impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 10 3.2.03-C Define: Criteria Definition Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 20 3.2.03-D Define: Determination of Impact Significance Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 10 3.2.04 Preliminary Mitigation Asessement(mitigation ID) Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 5 3.2.05 Review Preliminary Mitigation Criteria Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 0 3.2.06 Review Prel Assessement & Mitigation Plan Randy Pollock 1/16/98 1/31/97 0 3.2.07 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 4/1/97 4/25/97 0 Deliverables by Subtask Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID Number Description Resp Indiv "stare Finish CO" so, Client Final 3.2.08 Impacts Reassessed Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 0 3.2.09 Residual Impacts Determined Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 3/31/97 0 3.2.10 Finalize Results |A/MP Address Cumulative Effects Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-03 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 3.3.01 IA/MPP Incorporated into DEIS & FEIS Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.02 Mitigation Measures incorporated into ROD Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.03 Agency Review & Approval Tim Tetherow 5/15/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.04 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.05 Review & Approve Preliminary Results Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:11PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-04 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable 7 Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Ind. %C IDNumber _ Description esp indy Start Finish “~””P 50% Client _—Final Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-01 Subtask Description: ENVIRO PREFERRED ALTERNVE SELC 4.1.01 Compilation of Impact Data/by Alternative Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.02 Development of Criteria&Rte Comparison Mat Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.03 Two Day Route Comparison Meeting Tim Tetherow 4/16/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.04 ID Team Meeting(Envirn Pfrd Rte & Agency/Pro Tim Tetherow 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.05 CWG Meetings(Comparison of Alternatives) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.06 IPG Meeting Chugach Electric 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.07 Public Open House (Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-A Anchorage(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-B Cooper Landing(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-C Soldotna(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.08 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 4/21/97 4/30/97 0 4.1.09 Select Agency Preferred Route Lead Agency 5/15/97 6/13/97 0 4.1.10 Comparison & Cross Discipline rankings/Alt Corr Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/30/97 0 4.1.11 Consideration of Public & Agency Comments Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 7/18/97 0 4.1.12 Select Environmentally Preferred Alternative Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 7/18/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 4.2.01 Newsletter # 2 (Route Selection Results) Tim Tetherow 7197 7/31/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-04 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 i Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Deliverable Resp Indiv - % Comp : : ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final 4.2.02 Review & Approve Newsletter # 2 Chugach Electric 7/15/97 7/31/97 0 4.2.03 Documentation of Route Selection Process Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 8/29/97 0 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:12PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indi . % Com, IDNumber _ Description pana’ Start Finish ~~” ”P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-01 Subtask Description: PDEIS PREPARATION 5.1.01 ID Team Mtg # 4 (PDEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 9/1/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.02 Environmental Data Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.03 14 - 8 1/2 X 11 Color Map Photos Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.04 2 - 18 X 30 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 §:1.,05 23 - 11 X 17 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.06 Develop Purpose and Need Statement Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.07 Prepare Preliminary DEIS Tim Tetherow 6/23/97 9/17/97 0 5.1.08 40 Copies (150 pages each) PDEIS Tim Tetherow 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.09 Distribution of Copies Chugach Electric 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.10 Review PDEIS Chugach Electric 9/1/97 9/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-02 Subtask Description: DEIS PREPARATION 5.2.01 1D Team Mtg # 5 (DEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 11/3/97 11/28/97 0 5.2.02 Compile & Incorporate Changes to PDEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 §.2.03 Finalize DEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 5.2.04 Review DEIS Lead Agency 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 5.2.05 Review & Approve DEIS Chugach Electric 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 i Mil D je Deliverable 5 Resp Indiv ilestone Dares % Comp Scheduled Rev oa ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DISTRIBUTE 5.3.01 Provide Lead Agency Signature Lead Agency 1/14/98 3/16/98 0 5.3.02 File with EPA Tim Tetherow 1/14/98 3/20/98 0 5.3.03 Print & Distribute DEIS Tim Tetherow 12/22/97 1/9/98 0 5.3.04 200 Copies(150 pgs/each) to Lead Fed Agency Tim Tetherow 1/26/98 1/30/98 0 5.3.05 Publish Notices of Availability Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.3.06 Distribute Copies to Interested Parties & Agencies Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.4.01 ID Team Meeting # 6 (Pre-Hearing) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.02 Newsletter # 3 (Announce Public Hearings) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.03 Review & Approve Newsletter # 3 Chugach Electric 1/15/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.04 Schedule & Conduct Public Hearing # 1 Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-A Anchorage Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-B Cooper Landing Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-C Soldotna Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.05 Public/Agency Review of DEIS Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.06 Recieve/Compile Public Comments on DEIS Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.07 Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.08 Attend Federal Hearings Tim Tetherow 2/16/98 3/11/98 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask St Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable : Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R Ind % Com, ID Number _ Description ene Start Finish ~~” ”P 50% Client _ Final POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:13PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Reso Ini Milestone Dates % Comp Scheduled Review Dates ‘oO ID Number Description P Start Finish 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-01 Subtask Description: PFEIS PREPARATION 6.1.01 Newsletter(Announce FEIS) Tim Tetherow 7/1/98 7/31/98 0 6.1.02 ID Team Mtg(Rvw Comments) Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 3/31/98 0 6.1.03 Respond to comments Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 4/17/98 0 6.1.04 Prepare PFEIS Tim Tetherow 4/20/98 5/20/98 0 6.1.05 ID Team Mtg(Review PFEIS) Tim Tetherow 5/1/98 5/29/98 0 6.1.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.07 Review PFEIS Chugach Electric 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.08 40 Copies of PFEIS Tim Tetherow 5/11/98 5/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-02 Subtask Description: FEIS PREPARATION 6.2.01 Compile & Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.2.02 Prepare FEIS Tim Tetherow 6/11/98 7/3/98 0 6.2.03 Review & Approve FEIS Chugach Electric 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 6.2.04 Provide Lead Agency Signature Tim Tetherow 8/10/98 8/20/98 0 6.2.05 Prepare FEIS for Printing Tim Tetherow 7/28/98 8/18/98 0 6.2.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask ee Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv % Com, ID Number Description een Start Finish ° . 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DOCUMENTATION 6.3.01 Print & Distribute FEIS Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 6.3.02 200 Copies for Distribution Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC REVIEW 6.4.01 FEIS Available to Public Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 6.4.02 Public Review Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-05 Subtask Description: RECORD OF DECISION 6.5.01 File FEIS with EPA Lead Agency 8/20/98 9/2/98 0 6.5.02 Record of Decision Lead Agency 7/6/98 8/28/98 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:16PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R Ind % Com; ID Number Description esp inv Start Finish ° P 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-05 Subtask Description: INDUCTIVE COORDINATION STUDIES 7.5.01 Summary Report William Riall 7/15/96 ~— 8/14/97 50 7.5.02 Recommend Dsg Parameters William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 70 7.5.03 Telephone Contacts William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-06 Subtask Description: EMF CALCULATIONS 7.6.01 EMF Models Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 20 7.6.02 EIS & Prelim Eng Calculations Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 0 7.6.03 Text & Graphs or Charts-ElS Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 20 7.6.04 RFI/TVI & Audible Noise Analysis Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 0 7.6.05 Attendance at Public Hearings (Mike Silva) Larry Henriksen 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-07 Subtask Description: CATHODIC PROTECTION 7.7.01 Summary Report William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 90 7.7.02 Recommend Design Parameters William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 90 7.7.03 Office Visit to Pipeline-Anchorage William Riall 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 100 7.7.04 Telephone Contact of Pipeline William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 60 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Resp Indiv Milestone Dates % Comp Scheduled review ates ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-01 Subtask Description: ALTERNATE LOAD STUDIES 7.1.01 Determine System Requirements Ronald Beazer 7/1/96 12/31/96 90 7.1.02 Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 7/1196 12/13/96 90 7.1.03 Meeting with IPG Members Ronald Beazer 8/5/96 8/6/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-02 Subtask Description: SYSTEM OUTAGE(N-1) 7.2.01 Emergency Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 7/1/96 12/13/96 90 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-03 Subtask Description: DYNAMIC STABILITY 7.3.01 Dynamic Stability Analysis Ronald Beazer 7/1196 12/13/96 90 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-04 Subtask Description: SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES REPORT 7.4.01 10 Copies Draft Report Section Ronald Beazer 11/25/96 12/6/96 0 7.4.02 IPG Teleconference Ronald Beazer 12/2/96 12/9/96 0 7.4.03 Final Report Section Ronald Beazer 12/9/96 12/13/96 25 POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:18PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable ; Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates =i Resp Indiv es % Comp i ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-01 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES 8.1.01 Hydrographic Rpt Bottom Profiles William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.1.02 One Mobilization-Hydrographic Subcontractor William Riall 6/14/96 —- 8/15/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-02 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC SUPERVISION 8.2.01 Report Findings of Investigations William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.02 Work Log of Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.03 Field Eng Present During Hydro Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.04 Analyze Data-Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.05 Feasibility Submarine Cable Crossings William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 85 8.2.06 Assessment of Cable Embedment Opt. William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 85 8.2.07 Recommend Prelim Cable Const William Riall 10/1/96 10/14/96 30 8.2.08 Prelim Recommend-Armoring & Install William Riall 10/1/96 10/14/96 30 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-03 Subtask Description: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 8.3.01 Geotechnical Information Summary Larry Henriksen 11/1/96 1/2/97 0 8.3.02 Review Existing Geotech Data Larry Henriksen 7/1196 1/2/97 5 8.3.03 Review Construction & Operations Experience Larry Henriksen 7/1/96 1/2/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID makes Gasetpiicn on aEEE ‘Start Finish One = an eat 8.3.04 Arrange For & Use Geotech Larry Henriksen 71196 1/2/97 0 8.3.05 Visit to Enstar's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 7/1/96 1/2/97 0 8.3.06 Visit to Tesoro's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 7/1196 1/2/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-04 Subtask Description: FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 8.4.01 Summarize Field Notes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.02 Field Observations-Environ Personnel Tim Tetherow 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.03 Field Observations-Eng Personnel Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.04 Identify Propective Centerline Locations Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 60 8.4.05 Identify Potential Mitigation Methods Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.06 Identify Most Appropriate Structure Types Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.07 Select Submarine Cable Landfall Locations William Riall 6/14/96 8/15/97 80 8.4.08 Identify Tech or Environmental Challenges Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.09 Note Other Observed Features Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.10 Fixed Wing Aircraft Overflight-ID'd Routes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.11 3 Days Helicopter Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.12 9 Days on Ground Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.13 Detailed Field Review/Alternatives in Table 1 Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-05 Subtask Description: SUMMARY OF FIELD REPORT 8.5.01 Copies of Summary Field Report Michael Walbert 10/15/96 2/13/98 5) Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates’ , Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv a % Comp | | ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final 8.5.02 Prelim Submarine Cable Recommendations William Riall 6/14/96 2/13/98 25 8.5.03 Observations & Conclusions Impacting Project William Riall 6/14/96 2/13/98 25 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, Mar 14,1997 3:20PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv oe % Com, | ID Number Description ee Start Finish ° P 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-07 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DESIGN-SUBSTATIONS 9.07.01 One-Line and General Arrangement Drawings Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.07.02 Modify Existing General Arrangement Plans Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.07.03 Identify & Note Bus Connct & Phasing on DWGS Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.07.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maintenance Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-08 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRTRIA-REACT 9.08.01 Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-09 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-REACITVE COMP 9.09.01 Modify One Lines and General Arrangements Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 0 9.09.02 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-10 Subtask Description: COST EST-SUBMARINE CABLES 9.10.01 Cost Estimates William Riall 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable vag dcile Milestone Dates % Comp Scheduled Review Dates ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-13 Subtask Description: COST EST-REACTIVE COMPENSATION 9.13.01 Cost Estimate Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.13.02 Compile/Review Vendor Support Data Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-14 Subtask Description: COST EST-R O W ACQUISITION 9.14.01 3 Identified Alternative Routes Cost Estimates Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.02 Develop Land Costs Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.03 Develop Labor/Exp Costs to Acquire Easements Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-01 Subtask Description: MANUFAC/UTIL SITE VISIT-SUBMAR 9.01.01 Manufacturer & Factory Inspections William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.02 Utility Specific Operating Data William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.03 1 - 7 Day Trip for 2 people to Denmark William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-02 Subtask Description: PRELIM DESIGN & SPEC-SUB CABLE 9.02.01 Preliminary Design Parameters William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 5 9.02.02 Preliminary Performance Specs William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 5 9.02.03 Determine Const/Operation/Main Requirements William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 5 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask a, Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable i Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates ~ Resp Indiv cm % Com H ID Number Description P Start Finish i P 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-03 Subtask Description: SUMMARY CABLE REPORT 9.03.01 10 Copies of Summary Report William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.02 Recommend Specific Cable Type William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.03 Recommend Most Probable Method of Installation William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-04 Subtask Description: SUBMARINE/LAND CBL TRAN SITES 9.04.01 Preliminary Site Specific Arrangements William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.02 Engineering Sketches of Transition Station William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.03 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/10 Sub CBL Landfalls William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.04 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/2 Transiton Sites William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-05 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-O H LINE 9.05.01 Preliminary Design for Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 30 9.05.02 Prel DSGN for DBL Circuit Single Pole Structures Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 30 9.05.03 Est/Dist Underbuilt to Single Pole Struct Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 30 9.05.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 30 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-06 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRIT-SUBSTAT 9.06.01 Site Visits Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 8/30/96 100 9.06.02 Data Acquisition/Drawing Collection Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 10/15/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Resp Indiv Milestone Dates % Comp Scheduled Review Dates ‘o ID Number Description Start Finish 50% Client Final 9.06.03 Schedule and Attend Meetings Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 9.06.04 Provide Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 80 9.06.05 One Mobilization/Office Visit Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-11 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-O H LINE 9.11.01 Cost Estimates guyed "X" Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.02 Cost Estimates Single Stl Pole Single Circuit Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.03 Cost Estimates Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.04 Cost Estimates DBL Circuit Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.05 Cost Est Addition of Underbuilt to Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.06 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.07 Summary Cost Report Larry Henriksen 4/15/97 5/14/97 25 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-12 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-SUBSTATIONS 9.12.01 Cost Estimate for 2 New Endpoints Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.12.02 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.12.03 Summary Cost Report Stanley Sostrom 4/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-23-09-15 Subtask Description: SUMMARY COST REPORT 9.15.01 15 Copies Summary Reports Michael Walbert 4/15/97 5/14/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R %C ID Number Description saiiiiead Start Finish shamalii 50% Client Final 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 3-08-97 38RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH|_ JUN/JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 SCOPING Actual % Work Completed 5% 20% 28% 33% __ 51% 72%| __77% 93% it : i TT I CT TU TTT TU Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 2% 25% 26% 33% 52% 74% 87% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 30% 30% 33% 51% 63%] TT%\ 93% | Health Base Planned $ (this period) $6,743 $81,045 $2,745 $25,645 $67,045 $75,045 $46,045 $23,645 — $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $67,538 $60,112 © $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $15,925 $89,330 ($558) $9,848 $63,340 $42,082 $67,538 $59,509 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $6,743 $87,788 $90,533 $116,178 $183,223 $258,268 $304,313 $327,958 — $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $287,505 $347,617 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) $15,925 $105,255 $104,697 $114,545 $177,885 $219,967 $287,505 $347,014 ai} Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 — $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $23,789 $23,789 — $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $335,125 $245,795 $246,353 $236,505 $173,165 $131,083 $87,334 $27,825 — 2 INVENTORY Actual % Work Completed 0% 6% 25% 45% 60% 67% 73% 80% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 5% 23% 53% 73% 83% 84% 84% © 84% 84% 87% 95% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73% 82% 86% 86% 89% 92% 96% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 5% 24% 43% 58% 72% 73% 78% _ | Base Planned $ (this period) $941 $29,441 $121,000 $200,500 $129,500 $69,768 $5,000 $0 | $0 $1,000 $16,500 $52,000 $34,056 $1,000 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $19,728 $58,932 $8,817 $3,000 $17,500 $19,000 $29,613 $26,975 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $32,162 $124,454 $129,043 $100,796 $89,331 $19,728 $33,908 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $941 $30,382 $151,382 $351,882 $481,382 $551,150 $556,150 $556,150 $556,150 $557,150 $573,650 $625,650 $659,706 $660,706 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $495,514 $554,446 $583,503 $586,503 $604,003 $623,003 $652,616 $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $32,162 $156,616 $285,659 $386,455 $475,786 $495,514 $529,422 _ Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $679,591 $679,591 — $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget $660,706 $628,544 $504,090 $375,047 $274,251 $184,920 $184,077 $150,169 3 _|IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 10% © Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 25% 40% 50% 80% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7% 20% 55% 69% 82% 89% 96% 99% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 9% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $30,000 $85,000 $90,000 $57,000 $117,000 $90,000 $28,010 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $10,408 $81,590 — $111,370 $88,030 $78,700 $42,295 $37,600 $18,000 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $383 $64 $0 $5,788 $23,901 $10,408 $14,998 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $59,000 $144,000 $234,000 $291,000 — $466,000 $556,000 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $40,544 $122,134 $332,994 $421,024 $499,724 $542,019 $579,619 $597,619 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $383 $447 $447 $6,235 $30,136 $40,544 $55,542 j Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $606,612 $606,612 ~ $ $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $584,010 $583,627 $583,563 $583,563 $577,775 $553,874 $566,068 $551,070 ——$ Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 1 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 3-08-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 38RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB APR MAY JUN JUL [ AUG SEP 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION a Actual % Work Completed 0%! 0% | 0% 0% : 0% 0% i 0% meo5 0 60hCtti=«SY iL lini | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11%! 85%] 1%] 80% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 5% = 159 31% 49% 71% 91% 100% 100%] Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9 lil Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . $0 $32,400 $74,400 $77,400 $58,400 $60,875 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $15,000 $52,000 $62,000 $72,000 $69,000 $29,972 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $1,369 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ) $0 $32,400 $106,800 $184,200 $242,600 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,369 $16,369 $ 51 $103,369 $165,369 $237,369 $306,369 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 | ,36 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303, $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $32,866 $32,866 — $32 5€ $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $336,341 $336,341 —$ 34 1 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget $303,475 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $334,972 $334,972 5 DRAFT EIS 3 Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 2% 3% 4% 11% 19% 34% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 13% 32% 43% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,572 $5,772 $1,582 $31,570 $31,570 $57,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA $0 $6,100 — $0 $4,000 $0 $43,300 $78,052 $42,017 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,344 $13,116 $14,698 $46,268 $77,838 $135,408 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $6,100 $10,100 | $10,100 $53,400 $131,452 $173,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 6 FINAL EIS Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 0%| 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | __ $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 2 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 3-08-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 | 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 STUDIES Actual % Work Completed el 5% i ge it 7%| 8%] 14%] 27%] 35% iit im i Fi it i Ci Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 9% 21% 51% 73% 73% 73% 78% 80% 83% 87% 91% 91% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 38% | 56% _ 56% 67% 78% 89% 90% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 3% 7% 7% 8% 14% 27% 33% _ Base Planned $ (this period) $927 $3,927 $4,427 $12,200 $30,325 $22,780 $0 $0 | $2,300 $2,280 $2,300 | $4,139 $4,175 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $13,352 $10,492 $500 $500 $11,156 $11,300 $11,207 $802 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $2,569 $4,177 $637 $1,148 $5,705 $13,352 $5,455 { $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $927 $4,854 $9,281 $21,481 $51,806 $74,586 $74,586 $74,586 — $79,186 $31,466 $83,766 $87,905 $92,080 $92,080 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $27,588 $38,080 — $56,615 $57,115 $68,271 $79,571 $90,778 $91,580 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $2,569 $6,746 $7,383 $8,531 $14,236 $27,588 $33,043 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A __ NA N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget $101,480 $98,911 $94,734 $94,097 $92,949 $87,244 $73,892 $68,437 | i 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Actual % Work Completed 5% 15% 50% 60% 70% 74% 77% 79% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 5% 18% 52% 63% 68% 78% 86% 91% 91% 91% 94% 97% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77% 79% 81% 81% 88% 95% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 13% 48% 60% 70% 74% 77% 79% Base Planned $ (this period) $9,600 $27,600 $68,900 $20,980 $10,800 $20,630 $16,600 $9,955 — $0 $0 $5,500 $5,500 $6,540 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $7,645 $4,000 © $0 __ $0 $15,000 $14,000 $10,026 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,330 $17,007 $69,770 $23,487 $20,840 $7,949 $7,645 $2,827 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $9,600 $37,200 $106,100 $127,080 $137,880 $158,560 $175,160 $185,115 $185,115 $185,115 $190,615 $196,115 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $157,028 $161,028 — $163,629 $153,629 $178,629 $192,629 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,330 $27,337 $97,107 $120,594 $141,434 $149,383 $157,028 $159,855 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $192,325 $175,318 $105,548 $82,061 $61,221 $53,272 $45,627 $42,800 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Actual % Work Completed 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 2% 4% 9% 23% 31% 44% 57% 88% 97% 98% 98% 98% 98% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 36% 71% _ 85% 98% 98% 98% 98% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% Base Planned $ (this period) $2,580 $2,137 $2,137 $10,337 $27,417 $14,557 $23,697 $25,557 $32,397 $16,076 $2,132 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,937 $33,000 $35,000 $25,000 $25,330 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $1,694 $0 $1,080 $0 $20,307 $9,513 $1,937 $2,746 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,580 $4,717 $6,854 $17,191 $44,608 $59,165 $82,862 $108,419 $167,653 $183,729 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $34,531 $67,531 $135,531 $160,531 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,694 $1,694 $2,774 $2,774 $23,081 $32,594 $34,531 $37,277 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A __ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $188,167 $188,167 $187,087 $187,087 $166,780 $1 57,267 | $155,330 $152,584 | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 3 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 206-87 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 3 Actual % Work Completed 1% 5% 12% 18% 24% _ 30% 33%| 38% ee | _ __ a Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 12%) 22% 31% 41% 47% 51% ~ 60% 64% 69% 74% 79% 83% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA 33% 42% — 56% 62% 69% 75% 81% 84% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 6% 12% 18%) 24% 30% 33% 37% = L Base Planned $ (this period) $20,791 $144,150 $199,209 $298,662 $295,087 $287,830 $181,342 $116,157 © $153,269 $147,528 | $130,424 $170,609 $134,741 $119,445 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA $120,608 $269,226 $207,687 $182,530 | $219,686 $198,895 $196,470 $87,794 Actual $ Expended (this period) $27,949 $142,820 $198,987 $163,015 $212,219 $178,481 $120,608 $119,443 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $20,791 $164,941 $364,150 $662,812 $957,899 | $1,245,729 | $1,427,071 $1,543,228 — $1,812,498 | $1,960,026 | $2,090,450] $2,261,059 | $2,395,800 | $2,515,245 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A\ N/A N/A N/A] $1,044,079 | $1,313,305 — $1,756,580 | $1,939,110 | $2,158,796 | $2,357,691 $2,554,161 $2,641,955 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $27,949 $170,769 $369,756 $532,771 $744,990 $923,471 $1,044,079 | $1,163,522 | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 — $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 $ $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget $3,015,474 | $2,872,654 | $2,673,667 | $2,510,652 | $2,298,433 | $2,119,952 | $2,102,391 $1,982,948 | BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $364,150 $881,579 $413,500 $431,221 $424,795 | BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS | $1,245,729 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $609,903 $483,159 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 _| ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $405,250 $o $o ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 4 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 08-87 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC 1 SCOPING ; Actual % Work Completed Si a i _ 4. a — PT [Seema UNNI i in i TT Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100%| 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ___ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget | 2 INVENTORY | Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) : Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget | 3 _|IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PL | Actual % Work Completed | - Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% _ 100% 100% ___ 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ___ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $8,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ) $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 L $22,602 i $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget | | . | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on.the September invoice. Page 5 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 3-08-97 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 6 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Actual % Work Completed - — ee ee | it it. fe _ _ {[o | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,344 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 $32,865 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $338,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget 5 DRAFT EIS | Actual % Work Completed : Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 50% 55% 60% 66% 85% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 59% 66% 73% 85% 92% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $42,570 $18,742 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $66,200 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $30,001 $1,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $199,978 $221,548 $241,118 $266,688 $341,258 $383,828 | $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $42,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $239,669 $268,669 $297,669 $347,569 $375,569 $405,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $467,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 Actual $ Expended (to date) | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget ; 6 FINAL EIS | Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 16% 26% 50% 60% __ 74% 84% 94% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17% 40% 53% 73% 86% 90% 93% 96% 98% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,100 $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 $25,100 $24,600 $24,600 $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900 $55,563 $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $8,700 $6,660 $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $39,100 $64,200 $123,800 $148,900 $184,000 $208,600 $233,200 $247,616 $247,616 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900 $98,463 $132,163 $180,229 $214,033 $222,233 $230,933 $237,593 $243,756 $247,616 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| __N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 | $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget | | 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 3-08-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 DEC | TASK MONTH ocT NOV JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OocT NOV DEC If STUDIES Actual % Work Completed _ ee — | — | - |. | _ a - ih | ee - — Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 96% 96% 96% 96%| «96% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% |___Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $5,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $O| $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $O | $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual $ Expended (to date) | L Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A’ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 | $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget | 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK | | | Actual % Work Completed T | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 1 00%! 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | ___ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 | $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget | 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING | Actual % Work Completed | ; | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%| 98%) 98% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98%) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%) 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | L | | | | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | _ $0 | $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ____ $0 [ $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $135,861 | $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 | $135,861 | $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) | | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $139,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A; CNAA| N/A\ N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 | $189,861 | $189,861 $189,861 $139,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget | | | Page 7 3/14/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 3-08-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 83RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 ____ Actual % Work Completed —__| ll ll __| _ Pee Pall I malities fie EM ! ! Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 85% 85% 86% 87% 89% 91% 93% 94% 96% 96% 98% 99% 100%| —:100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 86% 87% 88% 90% 91% 93% 95% 96% 98% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $47,970 $57,842 $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 $25,100 $28,600 $28,600 $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $75,193 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $78,801 $57,467 $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $12,700 $10,660 $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,579,815 | $2,601,385 | $2,620,955 | $2,646,525 | $2,721,095 | $2,769,065 | $2,826,907 | $2,852,007 | $2,911,607] $2,936,707 | $2,971,807 | $3,000,407| $3,029,007 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $2,717,148 | $2,746,148 | $2,775,148 | $2,825,048 | $2,853,048 | $2,931,849 | $2,989,317 | $3,023,017 | $3,071,082 | $3,104,886 | $3,113,086 | $3,125,786 | $3,136,446 | $3,142,609 $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470} $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget | BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $105,710 $148,110 $142,542 $88,300 $43,016 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,375,226 $422,468 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $133,193 $156,701 $139,233 $54,704 $20,683 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,851,677 $371,321 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $a $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $405,250 $o Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 8