Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S Intertie report 4-1997
CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Report for the Month of APRIL 1997 CHUGACH ELECTRIC Us ee IN kectric ASSOCIATION, INC. April 29, 1997 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority 480 West Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 Attention: Mr. Randy Simmons, Executive Director Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for April 1997 W.0.4E9590081 Dear Mr. Simmons: Please find enclosed 1 (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for the Month of April 1997. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. Sincerely, en ail Eugene N. Bjornstad General Manager Nae Enclosures: 1 (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report c: Lee Thibert Joe Griffith Michael Massin Dora Gropp John Cooley Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.O0.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive « P.O. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 Il. iil. Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY ....... ccc cee cece cee eee ee eee ee eee ee eens I-1 FINANCIAL, 2.6. siteisie sooo oo 6 8 Hwee oes 468 € He MNO SLABELE Il-1 1. Total Project Expenditures as of February 1997 2. Chugach Statement for February 1997 3. Bank Statement of March 1997 4. Audit Report of December 31, 1996 SCHEDULE 6 6 6 00660666655 coo NETO ROOST ETT HERS SHOES Iil-1 ITEMS FOR APPROVAL ......... 0. cece eee eee ee eee eee eees IvV-1 1. Proposal for Update of the 1990 Economic Feasibility Study (Decision Focus) ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION ........ 2... e eee eect eee ee eens V-1 None ITEMS FOR INFORMATION .......... 00. cece c cree ccc eees VI-1 1. Power Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, April 17, 1997. 2. Executed copy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Colletion Agreement received March 28, 1997. 3. Executed copy of U.S. Forest Service amended Collection Agreement received April 11, 1997 ii Report for the Month of March 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 I. SUMMARY The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the federal lead agencies (RUS, USFS, USFWS) and the “applicant” (Chugach Electric on behalf of the IPG) has been finalized and signed by Chugach. It is being circulated to the lead agencies for signature. RUS has notified us that they will not be able to sign as a co-lead agency. We are investigating the possibility of USFWS taking on the lead agency’s tasks for the effort. The Scoping Report (draft) has been submitted to the agencies for approval. It is expected to be finalized in May. study for the project, which is included for approval. The work is proposed to be performed in two phases. DFI will review the 1990 study to determine the sections that may need to be updated ($40,000 max.) and then estimate the costs for the actual updates ($140,000 max). \ Decision Focus (DFI) has submitted a proposal for an update of the 1990 cost/benefit NERC has not yet responded to our request for a review of the 1990 Railbelt Reliability Assessment and we are investigating other ways to address the reliability issues. The Consultant’s schedule continues to show the effects of delays encountered in bringing the federal agencies together in the scoping, inventory and impact assessment tasks, standing at 46% completion compared to 56% planned. Review of the overall schedule still allows for filing of the draft EIS in early 1998 if no further delays occur. The third set of Community Working Group meetings will be held on April 28, 1997 in Kenai and April 30, 1997 in Anchorage. The topics will be impact assessment and mitigation planning. DESCRIPTION POWER USFS/USFWS CHUGACH ENGINEERS BUDGET 33,045.403.00 | _si00o00.00 ALLOCATED $201,295.30 $10,000.00 $40,000.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL $3,244,718.30 $110,000.00 $440,000.00 $3,794,718.30 es Supe situate $3,543,423.00 $251,295.30 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 DESCRIPTION POWER USFS/USFWS CHUGACH TOTAL ENGINEERS TOTAL $3,347,765.30 $110,000.00 $440,000.00 $3,897,765.30 COMMITMENT INVOICED TO DATE $1,460,332.00 $34,954.00 $71,417.00 $1,566,703.00 % OF TOTAL 43.62% 31.78% 16.23% 40.19% Note: “Invoiced to Date” shows charges received (not yet accrued) and accrued as of April 21, 1997. An independent audit of the project has been performed for 1996 by KPMG Peat Marvick in accordance with the requirements of Section 5 of the Grant Administration Agreement. The audit has been submitted to the State of Alaska, Department of Administration through AIDEA on April 10, 1997. A copy is included in this section. 1-2 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 FINANCIAL 1. Total Project Expenditures as of February 1997 2: Chugach Statement for February 1997 3: Bank Statement of March 1997 4. Audit Report of December 31, 1996 II-1 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. E. Southern Intertie Transactions APR 4 1997 “hee: Inception Through February 28, 1997 TRANS SPECIAT PEON Project Expenditures CJEOT Year to Date Month Through Through Ended Inception 12/31/96 1/31/97 2/28/97 Through 2/28/ Direct Labor $68,678.93 $2,712.94 $3,558.67 $74,950.! Indirect Labor 23,471.09 1,194.21 1,363.68 26,028:: Power Engineers 1,918,877.36 (43,041.43) 102,484.15 1,978,320.! Miscellaneous 30,326.81 274.58 15.50 30,616.' Total $2,041,354.19 ($38,859.70) $107,422.00 (1) _$2,109,916.. (1) This balance is lower than the 4/3/97 invoice for January charges due to the reversal of a $16,958.57 invoice accrual. Chugach does not include accruals in project invoices; only actual expenditures are reimbursed from restricted grant funds. Grant Fund Expenditures Month Month Through Ended Ended Inception 12/31/96 1/31/97 2/28/97 Through 2/28/: Direct Charges that Chugach has been Reimbursed for $1,433,087.47 $234,735.50 $306,667.10 (2) $1,974,490. Plus General, Administrative & Construction Overhead 7,165.42 1,173.68 1,533.34 (2) 9,872. Total Amounts Paid to Chugach $1,440,252.89 $235,909.18 $308,200.44 (2) $1,984,362. (2) Chugach February 13, 1997 invoice for December, 1996 charges. CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska April 3, 1997 in APR 4 3097 TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Kimberly Pond, Plant Accountant | SUBJECT: 9590081 - Southern Intertie Route Selection Study You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Southern Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occurred during February 1997. Direct Labor 3,558.67 Indirect Labor 1,363.68 Power Engineers Invoice # 43012 59,508.84 Power Engineers Invoice # 43013 33,908.30 Power Engineers Invoice # 43014 14,997.71 Power Engineers Invoice # 43015 5,454.67 Power Engineers Invoice # 43016 2,827.45 Power Engineers Invoice # 43017 2,745.75 Federal Express Invoice # 4-045-72731 15.50 Sub-Total $124,380.57 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) HULL |-21200) Total Charges $125,002.47 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As you requested, I'll keep the original in my files. WN bn fap yer KP/kp WOfiles/E9590081 Attachments & eCEIve ‘i Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary APR 4 1997 March, 1997 a ae TRANSMISSION & SPECIAL PROJEST February Ending Balance forward $1,337,685.59 Total Deposits $0.00 Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for January charges) ($5,071.08) Interest Earned $5,522.91 Balance March 28, 1997 $1,338,137.42 a} CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT OMAP Botti e a 3 : eee ty Account Number: 0110 606 1 Member FDIC Prepared After the Close Of BusinessOn: Mar 28 1997 Page: 1 of 3 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC SOUTHERN INTERTIE GRANT FUND PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 FIRSTLINE: (907) 265-470 BRANCH: MAIN BRANCH (907) 265-352 1 CYCBI osc 5966 PREVIOUS BALANCE AS OF 02/28/97 $.00 Service Charge inis month $.00 40 Deposits & Other Credits $26,794,205.13 Interest Paid inis Month $.00 21 Checks and Other Debits $26,794,205.13 CURRENT BALANCE AS OF 03/28/97 $.00 <<a eee ea en aaa a ae soa eee ------ Daily Account Balance Summary ---- - Balance Date Balance Date Balance -00 03/03 -00 03/10 -00 -00 03/04 -00 03/11 00 -00 03/05 -00 03/12 -00 -00 03/06 -00 03/13 -00 -00 03/07 -00 03/14 oO ———— See wewnnseeneeennneesceenncceeo= Other Credits -<9----s ecco soc ow www nwo eee cecccocenessssccccce Amount Date ‘ Description 1,337,685.59 03/03 REPO CREDIT 578.55 03/03 REPO INTEREST 1,338,264.14 03/04 REPO CREDIT 196.65 03/04 REPO INTEREST 1,338,460.79 03/05 REPO CREDIT 196.68 03/05 REPO INTEREST 1,338,657.47 03/06 REPO CREDIT 196.71 03/06 REPO INTEREST 1,338,854.18 03/07 REPO CREDIT 196.74 03/07 REPO INTEREST 1,339,050.92 03/10 REPO CREDIT 590.30 03/10 REPO INTEREST 1,339,641.22 03/11 REPO CREDIT 195.36 03/11 REPO INTEREST 1,339,836.58 03/12 REPO CREDIT 195.39 03/12 REPO INTEREST 1,340,031.97 03/13 REPO CREDIT 195.42 03/13 REPO INTEREST 1,340,227.39 03/14 REPO CREDIT 195.45 03/14 REPO INTEREST 1,340,422.84 03/17 REPO CREDIT 586.43 03/17 REPO INTEREST 1,341,009.27 03/18 REPO CREDIT 198.17 03/18 REPO INTEREST 1,341,207.44 03/19 REPO CREDIT 198.20 03/19 REPO INTEREST 1,341,405.64 03/20 REPO CREDIT 198.23 03/20 REPO INTEREST 1,341,603.87 03/21 REPO CREDIT 198.26 03/21 REPO INTEREST 1,341,802.13 03/24 REPO CREDIT 594.87 03/24 REPO INTEREST 1,337,325.92 03/25 REPO CREDIT 202.83 03/25 REPO INTEREST 1,337,528.75 03/26 REPO CREDIT Pose: 2 OF 3 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC 1 CYCBI O8C 5966 aac a ae a ee eocceoso--- Other Credits ------------ Amount Date Description 202.86 03/26 REPO INTEREST 1,337,731.61 03/27 REPO CREDIT 202.89 03/27 REPO INTEREST 1,337,934.50 03/28 REPO CREDIT 202.92 03/28 REPO INTEREST woeeee--- woeren--- werner renee ----------- Other Debits .------------- Amount Date Description 1,338,264.14 03/03 REPO DEBIT 1,338,460.79 03/04 REPO DEBIT 1,338,657.47 03/05 REPO DEBIT 1,338,854. 18 03/06 REPO DEBIT 1,339,050.92 03/07 REPO DEBIT 1,339,641.22 03/10 REPO DEBIT 1,339,836.58 03/11 REPO DEBIT 1,340,031.97 03/12 REPO DEBIT 1,340,227.39 03/13 REPO DEBIT 1,340,422.84 03/14 REPO DEBIT 1,341,009.27 03/17 REPO DEBIT 1,341,207.44 03/18 REPO DEBIT 1,341,405.64 03/19 REPO DEBIT 1,341,603.87 03/20 REPO DEBIT 1,341,802.13 03/21 REPO DEBIT 5,071.08 03/24 DEBIT MEMO(TC6O) 1,337,325.92 03/24 REPO DEBIT 1,337,528.75 03/25 REPO DEBIT 1,337,731.61 03/26 REPO DEBIT 1,337,934.50 03/27 REPO DEBIT 1,338,137.42 03/28 REPO DEBIT Put your equity to work. interest paid may be up to 100% tax-deductible. CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT Account Number: Q) 110 606 1 Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Mar 28 1997 Our HomeFlex Equity Line has two interest rate options in one program plus the Apply at any branch. FNBA is an equal housing lender. W.0. EPS%00§/ Sec. & SoMery, /« Are CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. State Financial Assistance Reports Year ended December 31, 1996 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. State Financial Assistance Reports Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors’ Report on Schedule of State Financial Assistance..............:scsesesesee 1 Schedule of State Financial Assistance \.<.20<.-.<-.--csc-cscscsceansceceasssatcevsvesseuscssssscsasessenssesesesssoeze 2 Notes to Schedule of State Financial Assistance Ss Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance at the Financial Statement Level.................. 4 Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance with General Requirements Applicable to Major State Financial Assistance Programs ............s:ssssssscssssssseessesesssenencsenesencneneeceeeees 5-6 Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance with Specific Requirements Applicable to Major State: Financial Assistance Programs '<scsccscecspeccssuscsscestscsuesosesescascsstscassesiseseacense 7-8 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control Structure at the inancial; Statement evel orc sscszcecevacsccecteecscecesecesccnsnsva sg stencnss usesei el scasecsencasecsnnsescecewrssese 9-10 Independent Auditors’ Report on the Internal Control Structure Used in Administering State Financial Assistance Programs—Major Programs More Than Fifty Percent of Total State Financial Assistance Expenditures. ............ssssssssssssseseseseseseeeececeseseeneneaeeees 11-13 ‘Peat Marwick LLP 601 West Fifth Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501-2258 Independent Auditors’ Report on Schedule of State Financial Assistance The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc.: We have audited the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. taken as a whole. The accompanying Schedule of State Financial Assistance is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The information in the Schedule of State Financial Assistance has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented, in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a KANG Luar (Ma wik Loy March 5, 1997 2 s= Member Firm ot SS a SE SE KPNI Internationa’ CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Schedule of State Financial Assistance Year ended December 31, 1996 Total Payable to Receivable Grant Interest Total allowable State of Grant at receipts receipts cash expenses Alaska Name of award award Dec.31,1995 during year — during year receipts during year Dec.31,1996 State of Alaska Department of Administration passed through Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority - Southern Intertie Grant $ 46,800,000 70,067 2,771,277 40,361 2,811,638 1,971,612 (769,959) EE ES CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Notes to Schedule of State Financial Assistance Year ended December 31, 1996 General The accompanying Schedule of State Financial Assistance presents the activity of all state financial assistance programs of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (Association). State financial assistance received directly from state agencies as well as federal financial assistance passed through the state are included on the schedule. Basis of Accounting The accompanying Schedule of State Financial Assistance is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in note | to the Association's financial statements. : Peat Marwick LLP 601 West Fifth Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501-2258 Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance at the Financial Statement Level The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc.: We have audited the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2AAC 45.010). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Compliance with laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to Chugach Electric Association, Inc. is the responsibility of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.’s management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.’s compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. However, the objective of our audit of the financial statements was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with such provisions. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported herein under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended for the information of the Board of Directors, management, and the state cognizant agency. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. LPNG fur Mewik LU March 5, 1997 BeiSz we KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 601 West Fifth Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501-2258 Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance with General Requirements Applicable to Major State Financial Assistance Programs The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc.: We have audited the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. We have applied procedures to test Chugach Electric Association, Inc.'s compliance with the following requirements applicable to its major state financial assistance programs, which are identified in the Schedule of State Financial Assistance, for the year ended December 31, 1996: General requirements Public purpose Civil rights Minimum wages Prevailing wages Workers’ compensation Contractors’ bonds Political activity Responsibility for third parties Retention and inspection of records Our procedures were limited to the applicable procedures described in the State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2AAC 45.010) and the provisions of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget’s Audit Guide and Compliance Supplement for State Single Audits. Our procedures were substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion on Chugach Electric Association, Inc.'s compliance with the requirements listed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. With respect to the items tested, the results of those procedures disclosed no material instances of noncompliance with the requirements listed in the second paragraph of this report. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that Chugach Electric Association, Inc. had not complied. in all material respects, with those requirements. Furthermore, the results of our procedures disclosed no immaterial instances of noncompliance with those requirements. Sug. | Memoer Firm ot SE KPMG internanora: KPMG Peat Marwick LP Page 2 The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc. This report is intended for the information of the Board of Directors, management, and the state cognizant agency. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. March 5, 1997 -Peat Marwick LLP 601 West Fifth Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501-2258 Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance with Specific Requirements Applicable to Major State Financial Assistance Programs The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc.: We have audited the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. We have also audited Chugach Electric Association, Inc.'s compliance with the requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed; eligibility; matching, level of effort, and/or earmarking requirements; reporting requirements; special tests and provisions, if any; claims for advances and reimbursements; and amounts claimed or used for matching that are applicable to each of its major state financial assistance programs, which are identified in the accompanying Schedule of State Financial Assistance, for the year ended December 31, 1996. The management of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. is responsible for Chugach Electric Association, Inc.'s compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with those requirements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance with those requirements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2AAC 45.010), and the provisions of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget’s Audit Guide and Compliance Supplement for State Single Audits. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the requirements referred to above occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about Chugach Electric Association, Inc.'s compliance with those requirements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. The results of our audit procedures disclosed no material or immaterial instances of noncompliance with the requirements referred to above. In our opinion, Chugach Electric Association, Inc. complied, in all material respects, with the requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed; eligibility; matching, level of effort, and/or earmarking requirements; special reporting requirements; special tests and provisions, if any; financial reports and claims for advances and reimbursements: and amounts claimed or used for matching that are applicable to each of its major state financial assistance programs for the year ended December 31, 1996. yz Memoer Firm o' = KPMG Internaticna’ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Page 2 The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc. This report is intended for the information of the Board of Directors, management, and the state cognizant agency. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. KAM, Lire Manwied Leh March 5, 1997 Peat Marwick LLP 601 West Fifth Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501-2258 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control Structure at the Financial Statement Level The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc.: We have audited the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2ZAAC 45.010). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The management of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate. In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, we obtained an understanding of the internal control structure. With respect to the internal control structure, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they have been placed in operation, and we assessed control risk in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide an opinion on the internal control structure. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Member Firm of SEF" KPMG International KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Page 2 The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal contro] structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the general-purpose financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operations that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control structure and its operations that we have reported to the management of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. in a separate letter dated March 5, 1997. This report is intended for the information of the Board of Directors, management, and the state cognizant agency. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. March 5, 1997 10 Peat Marwick LLP 601 West Fifth Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501-2258 Independent Auditors’ Report on the Internal Control Structure Used in Administering State Financial Assistance Programs—Major Programs More Than Fifty Percent of Total State Financial Assistance Expenditures The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc.: We have audited the financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. We have also audited the compliance of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., with requirements applicable to major state financial assistance programs and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 1997. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2AAC 45.010). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and about whether Chugach Electric Association, Inc. complied with laws and regula- tions, noncompliance with which would be material to a major state financial assistance program. In planning and performing our audits for the year ended December 31, 1996, we considered the internal control structure of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the component unit financial statements of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., and on the compliance of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., with requirements applicable to major programs, and to report on the internal control structure in accordance with State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2AAC 45.010). This report addresses our consideration of internal control structure policies and procedures relevant to compliance with requirements applicable to state financial assistance programs. We have addressed internal control structure policies and procedures relevant to our audit of the financial statements in a separate report dated March 5, 1997. The management of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal contro] structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and state financial assistance programs are managed 1] | Member Firm of SSE SESE SS KPMG internationa’ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Page 2 The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc. in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors, irregularities or instances of noncompliance may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate. For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal contro] structure policies and procedures used in administering state financial assistance programs in the following categories: = Accounting controls: Receipts and revenue Purchasing and cash disbursements Payroll * Administrative controls: General requirements: Public purpose Civil rights Minimum wages Prevailing wages Workers’ compensation Contractors’ bonds Political activity Responsibility for third parties Retention and inspection of records Specific requirements: Types of services allowed or unallowed Eligibility Matching, level of effort. and/or earmarking requirements Reporting requirements Special tests and provisions, if any For all of the internal control structure categories listed above. we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and determined whether they have been placed in operation, and we assessed control risk. KPMG Peat Marwick ue Page 3 The Board of Directors Chugach Electric Association, Inc. During the year ended December 31, 1996, Chugach Electric Association, Inc. expended 100% of its total state financial assistance under major state financial assistance programs. We performed tests of controls, as required by generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the State of Alaska Single Audit Regulation (2AAC 45.010), to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of internal control structure policies and procedures that we considered relevant to preventing or detecting material noncompliance with specific requirements, general requirements, and requirements governing claims for advances and reimbursements and amounts claimed or used for matching that are applicable to each of the major state financial assistance programs of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., which are identified in the accompanying Schedule of State Financial Assistance. Our procedures were less in scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on these internal control structure policies and procedures. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Our consideration of the internal control structure policies and procedures used in administering state financial assistance would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might constitute material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certi- fied Public Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that noncompliance with laws and regulations that would be material to a state financial assistance program may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operations that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we have reported to the management of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. in a separate letter dated March 5, 1997. This report is intended for the information of the Board of Directors, management, and the state cognizant agency. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. KPMG pre Meri Lu March 5S, 1997 13 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.4£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 Ii. SCHEDULE -1 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE 4/21/97 PHASE IB 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ID__| Task Name %Comp. | Act.cost_ [2] a3] a4 | ai [a2 [a3[a4 [ai [a2] a3 [a4 | ai [a2 [as[as|ai[a2[a3[a4/ ar [a2] a3s[as/ai 1 [ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEE 30% | $2,436,615.88 ; 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 18%| $72,005.40 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUD 100% | $871,650.00 4 EIS & PREL.ENGINEERIN 43% | $1,458,006.48 5 SCOPING 99%| $372,234.72 6 INVENTORY 88% | $595,261.46 7 IMPACT/MITIGATION 31%| $187,243.40 8 | ALTERN.SELECTION 0% $0.00 9 | _DRAFTEIS 0% $0.00 10 FINAL EIS 0% $0.00 1 STUDIES | §3%| $56,718.22 12 ENG.FIELD WORK ~ 87%| $176,300.71 3 | PREL. ENGINEERING | 37%| $70,247.97 14 AGENCIES (0%| $34,954.00 | 15 USFS 0%| $34,954.00 wanes sis 16 USFWS) 0% $0.00 1118 & a Task _ Summary ee koled Up Prog ess ic mp halaaiailamiain INTE | progress ME Rolled Up Task Milestone ¢ Rolled Up Milestone © CMAINDORA ACOLITHTIF\IPH IR MPP Paae 1 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 IV. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL 1. Proposal for Update of the 1990 Economic Feasibility study (Decision Focus) IV-1 Summary of Proposed Budget Decision Focus 1989 Study Review and Update Dames & [aber] Eeseneee NTE [NTE | Eatipoed [NTE —[ Eaten Phase 1 - Review of 1989 Se Categones {$2,605} $100|__$2.705 |__-$2.515] $52,000] $40,000] __$37.220/_$8.220 Phase 2—Detaied ea S4 2421 si0ol —s4.s4al —s2.s18| $100.0001 —s140.0oo] $108 8871 — $145.57 $s-aar| —soa0| sr oat Ss. 0a01 Sree oool —Steo cool —sieaarr] — stee.077 x suena me srl en) ssl seaetl ee a re eee ar liane ae er [Tots S647] $200| $7,047] 86,181] stsu 640] $163,600] _$160.416| _$158.416 —— Notes: 1. The proposed budget for Power and Dames & Moore accounts for the time required for interaction and | | administration of the DF! studies. For Power, the proposed budget also accounts for the time required to integrate | the technical aspects of the DFI studies into the Purpose & Need portion of the EIS. | | | \2. Decision Focus has referenced the potential for two trips to Alaska in their proposal. The potential for such meetings is mentioned only as part of Phase 2, the detailed update and analysis. Should meetings in Anchorage be required for Phase 2, and attendance from Power and/or Dames & Moore is required, the meeting will need to be scheduled so as to coincide with already scheduled project meetings. Based on this assumption, no funding for additional trip expenses are proposed for Power or Dames and Moore. 3. NTE means Not to Exceed for Labor and Expenses OFI Proposal Summary Apni 16. 1997 Hly 23-1454 eee OO G3 DAMES & MOORE A DAMES & MOORE GROUP COMPANY 633 Seventeenth Street. Suite 2 Denver, Colorado 80202-3625 April 14, 1997 303 294 9100 Tel 303 299 7901 Fax Mr. Randy Pollock Project Manager Power Engineers 3900 South Wadsworth Boulevard Suite 700 Lakewood, Colorado 80235 Subject: Decision Focus, Inc. Proposal for Southern Intertie Benefits Analysis Dear Randy: Attached is the proposal from Decision Focus, Inc. to review and revise the 1989 Study on the Benefits and Costs of the Southern Intertie Project. Please include the following charges from Dames & Moore: Project Management Coordination $1,370.00 Administration/Clerical $ 860.00 Handling Cost (2%) on $2,800.00 DFI total not to exceed total $5,030.00 Please let me know if there are any questions. Sincerely, SLA Tim Tetherow Project Manager Mirae Aindacnna Proposal to Review and Revise the 1989 Study on the Benefits and Costs of Proposed Transmission Lines in the Alaska Railbelt Background In 1989 Decision Focus Incorporated carried out an economic analysis of several proposed transmission line upgrades or additions in the Railbelt area of Alaska. The results of the analysis were documented in a December, 1989 report entitled “Economic Feasibility of the Proposed 138 KV Transmission Lines in the Railbelt.” One of the lines studied in the 1989 analysis, the Southern Intertie Project (SIP) between Anchorage and Kenai, is currently under serious consideration; an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project is being prepared. Because the 1989 analysis helped to justify the project, it is desirable to review that analysis to determine whether any changes have occurred in the years since 1989 that would alter the conclusions of that analysis. DFI proposes to carry out a review of the 1989 study to make such a determination. The review will be carried out in two stages. The first phase will update the study accounting for changes in such factors as electricity demand growth projections and projections of fuel prices, as well as updating the benefits estimates to 1997 dollars so they can be directly compared to current estimates of the cost of the proposed line. If any changes identified during the first phase are large enough to impact the conclusions of the earlier study, then more detailed analysis will be carried out in a second phase that may require re-doing major portions of the earlier study. Approach Phase I The 1989 analysis estimated benefits of a new Anchorage-Kenai transmission line in six categories: increased reliability increased transfers of economy energy reduced transmission losses increased state gas royalty and severance tax revenues resulting from increased gas utilization : deferral/avoidance of new generation capacity 6. reduced cost of maintaining operating reserves Site ca For each of these categories, DFI will review the assumptions and data values underlying the benefits calculations, update them as appropriate, and make the corresponding adjustments to the level of benefits by category. As part of this updating process, DFI will review the comments that have been submitted on the Southern Intertie Project. Depending on the nature of the comments, it may be desirable to talk directly with the parties making the comments or with others knowledgeable in the areas commented on. DFI can begin work as soon as we receive formal approval. If approval is received by May 1, and the data items listed below are provided quickly, then by May 20 DFI will have completed its review of the six benefits categories and determined whether significant additional analysis, i.e., Phase II, will be required. The remainder of Phase I, including the Draft Review Statement, will be completed by the middle of June. In late May or early June we will hold a teleconference review of project status and future direction. If Phase II effort is required, then the scope and schedule for that effort will be determined at this time. Such determination will probably involve a trip to Alaska to meet with the various parties. If a Phase II effort is required, it will begin as soon as approval is received. We will make évery effort to complete the analysis and draft documentation of Phase II by early July. Initial Data Requirements In order to meet the relatively tight deadlines of the project, it will be important to have much of the data on hand by May 1. This includes: 1. comments on the Southern Intertie Project 2. description of the SIP 3. prices, current and projected, of fuels used for generation (low, nominal, and high scenarios) 4. current and projected Railbelt electric demand (low, nominal, and high scenarios) 5. changes to existing or planned generating units since 1989: size, heat rates, etc. 6. any new studies on the value of reliability in the Railbeit area Cost and Billing DFI will bill Dames and Moore on a time and materials basis. The hourly billing rates for the individuals expected to work on the proposed effort are: Fancher $315 Haas $250 Stremel $215 Cohen $185 Support $80 We estimate that the cost of Phase I (labor, production of copies, no travel) will be about $32,000, and we guarantee that it will not exceed $40,000. Phase I is much harder to estimate, because we do not yet know what might be required. However, a reasonable estimate (labor, production of copies, two trips to Alaska) might be $100,000, with a not to exceed cost of $140,000. If travel is required, it will be billed at cost, which should not exceed $1,500 per trip. If additional efforts not described in this proposal are requested, their costs will be estimated when requested. Production costs for 40 copies each of the bound draft Review Statement and final Review Statement will be $300. Additional copies will be $4 per copy. Production costs for 40 copies each of the bound draft Revised Report and final Revised Report will be $600. Additional copies will be $8 per copy. DFI will invoice Dames and Moore monthly for work performed in the previous month. Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 Ve ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. V-1 Report for the Month of March 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB April 29, 1997 VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION 1: Power Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, April 17, 1997. Zs Executed copy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Colletion Agreement received March 28, 1997. a Executed copy of U.S. Forest Service amended Collection Agreement received April 11, 1997 VI-1 #) Ty, UES April 17, 1997 [ENGINEERS Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: POWER Project #120376 EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract #95-208 Monthly Status Report No. 10 For Period March 9,1997 - April 12, 1997 Dear Dora: The following activities were performed during this invoicing period on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Preliminary Engineering portion of the Southern Intertie Project. Key Issues: e The Project Schedule has been updated. Invoice Period Overview: Distributed scoping report Finalized EIS work plan Continued finalization of MOU Continued contact with co-lead agencies Teleconferences to disscuss Submarine cable installation Conducted second set of CWG meetings in Anchorage and Kenai Scheduled third set of CWG meetings Impact assessment criteria development Continued work on the system studies Continued work on preliminary engineering Work Planned for the Next Invoice Period: Continue to work with the CWGs Finalize MOU Continued development of impact assessment criteria Continued work on preliminary engineering Issue engineering studies draft report PEI-HLY 23-127 POWER Engineers, Incorporated EL 3940 Glenbrook Dr. + P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-345 Hailey. Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-208 Chugach Electric Association April 17, 1997 Page 2 Schedule: The schedule has been updated. The updated schedule includes tasks to account for the Alaska National Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA) application process. Monthly Status Report Issues: This monthly status report contains a Project Summary Report spreadsheet to reflect the current and projected cash flows. The Project Summary Report cash flow projection is being reviewed to determine if an update is required. Task 1 - Scoping The key issue is obtaining a final MOU agreement signatures. Task 3 - Impact Assessment/Mitigation Planning Due to the delay in starting project scoping. We are now beginning to expend efforts that were planned for previous months. Task 4 - Alternative Selection The continuing development of the MOU and scoping report has resulted in delayed efforts on Tasks 3 and 4, due to pending agency review and approval of these documents. PEI-HLY 23-127 ) ™ 2 OUEA (EES Chugach Electric Association April 17, 1997 Page 3 Task 7 - Studies Draft Supplemental Studies Report will be issued by the end of April. Task 8 - Engineering Field Work Conference calls were held to discuss submarine cable installation. Addtional field review of the routes is planned for the next period. Task 9 - Preliminary Engineering The work originally planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. Project Overview: Total Budget $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1.460.332 Actual Remaining Project Budget $1,686,137 Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to call me or Mike Walbert. Sincerely, Randy Pollock, P.E. Project Manager MW/th cc: PROJECT TEAM PEI-HLY 23-127 nue SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 120376-01 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY APRIL, 1997 INVOICE Base Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Project Total Not to Exceed Budget $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amendment No. 4 $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 | $32,866 $4,904 N/A N/A N/A N/A $103,046 Total Not to Exceed Budget Actual Budget Expended Through Previous Invoice $374,839 $372,814 $679,591 $592,924 $606,612 $97,425 $336,341 $407,474 $0 $247,616 $0 $101,480 $47,836 $202,655 $170,644 $189,861 $45,709 $3,146,469 $1,328,721 Current Invoice Amount $0 $2,888 $92,212 $0 $0 $0 $8,252 $4,825 $23,434 $131,611 Actual Budget Expended Through Current Invoice $372,814 $595,812 $189,637 $1,369 $0 $0 $56,088 $175,469 $69,143 $1,460,332 Remaining Budget PEI-HLY 23-127 $2,025 $83,779 $416,975 $334,972 $407,474 $247,616 $45,392 $27,186 $120,718 $1,686,137 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 1 - SCOPING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Scoping prepared and distributed 25 copies of the draft scoping report. continued revisions of the MOU and EIS work plan. KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-127bk finalized EIS work plan. The remaining milestone for this Task is obtaining a signed MOU from the agencies. No outstanding issues. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($351,050 + $23,789 = $374,839). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 374,839 372,814 2,025 No outstanding issues. APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 2 - INVENTORY DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Inventory e participated in two teleconferences to discuss submarine cable installation practices and feasibility. continued refinement of resource inventory data for analysis. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($660,706 + $18,885 = $679,591). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 679,591 595,812 83,779 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-127bk 2 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 3 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Impact Assessment / | conducted second set of CWG meetings in Anchorage Mitigation Planning and Kenai. revised project schedule. continued impact assessment criteria development. scheduled third CWG meeting dates. continued development of resource impact assessment KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-127bk models. Due to the delay in starting project scoping, we are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. Work began in December, 1996. The work planned for October, November and December, 1996 will be performed during January - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($584,010 + $22,602 = $606,612). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 606,612 189,637 416,975 No outstanding issues. w APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 4 - ALTERNATIVE SELECTION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Alternative Selection e Noaction KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: With Revision #1 we had planned to be working on task 4 during March and April. Due to the continuing development of the MOU and EVAL/EIS the start of this task has been delayed. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($303,475 + $32,866 = $336,341). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 336,341 1,369 334,972 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-127bk 4 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 5 - DRAFT EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Draft EIS e Noaction KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($402,570 + $4,904 = $407,474). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining $407,474 00 $407,474 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-127bk 5 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 6 - FINAL EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Final EIS e Noaction. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 247,616 00 247,616 SCOPE: . No outstanding issues. HLY 23-127bk 6 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 7 - STUDIES DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-127bk Studies No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted 101,480 No outstanding issues. Draft Supplemental Studies Report is being reviewed internally. This draft report will be issued by the end of April. $ Expended $ Remaining 56,088 45,392 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 8 - ENGINEERING FIELD WORK DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-127bk Engineering Field Work No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted 202,655 No outstanding issues. Conference calls to discuss Submarine Cable Installation. Field review of various line segments. $ Expended $ Remaining 175,469 27,186 APRIL 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 9 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-127bk | Preliminary Engineering |e Continued work on preliminary design and cost estimates for overhead lines, submarine cables and substations. No outstanding issues. The work planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 189,861 69,143 120,718 No outstanding issues. SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS . Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line T T 1808 7997 = 7888 a {889 ele ID Task Name - Start Elnish Aor May [sun | aut [aug 1 Sep 1 Toke (at mg 1 Sep [aT Wer tee] en] [Mer [ Apr [Way Ten Sarg [Sap [Oa] Nev [Dac ) dan] Fab] Mar [Aa May Jn] at ng) Sep [ter 2 | Task 1ScoPING onv86 e578 oo Sg eee ds a FILE NOTICE OF INTENT WITH FEDERAL REGISTER a 107998 70n0/86) ] MOL! AND WORKPLAN WITH CO LEAD AGENCIES 11/5/86 aa87 FILZ ADDENDUM TO NOTICE OF INTENT ~ a wsie7 ania? 7 | DEVELO® BASE MAPS AND ORDER PHOTOGRAPHY @rit/96 a/20/86 ot) EN 2-20 eo | PUBLICIASENGY SCOPING WEETINGS - NITIAL INTERAGENCY 7118126 | T1496 | 116 gis MEETING 1 PREPARE MATERIALS/DEVE_OP MAILING LIST a 715/96 10/25/98, 71S cs 13 FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES AND FIELD REVIEW “624136 10/1796 ons ET 071 15 | DRAFT SCOPING REPORT 11/14/98 28/87 1114 IT 2 7 "AGENCY COMMENTS - wale ane? 9 FINALIZE SCOPING REPORT 7 - wIST S597 a TASK ZINVENTORY erties shige 2) Gar i a a an SS TE m2 = IENTORY ALTERNATIVE - a ee + aT BE | __PaOUer sla Rem iaeReY TTR oe | aca a TTT] 28 | AGENCY FIELD RECONAISANCE eaaT ‘8/97 | 62 OP os 3 | BAHAR ERETEOORETATEN : ciara | | a TS STL EEE» 28 ‘ADDITIONAL FIELD REV'EW SURVEYS AND DOCUMENTATION 421/97 | 27/97 | es © | FD TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESSEMENT AND MITIGATION PLANNING 722106 Bnia7 7 : | - 7 m2 DEVELOP PROIECT CESCAIPTIONILOCATION Trai Sia197 | Fr DEVELOP IA/MP APPROACH AND GAITERIA Tor2ie6 5/2187 a8 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE S587 S287 37 CONDUCT INITIAL [AMP - eara7 | 66/97 38 AGENGY REVIEW AND APPROVE ear SaTaT a FINALIZE [A/M®/GOSUMENTATION 7 aoe? TANT Pa AGENGY REVIEW AND APPROVE har aa ra TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE COMPARISONS 12/16/96 ‘antia7 46 DEVELOP ENVIRONMENTAL SELEOTION CAITERIA Tatee6 518/87 a | “AGENCY MEVIEW AND APPROVE 7 sn2ie7 | 5/30/87 as | CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVE COMPARISONS si12/87 | 27/97 [st AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE SeST FBIOT - - - | 53 PREFFERE! savor 7a eno MEM 725 Ge) APPLICANTS PROPOSED ALTESNATIVE - Wea? ener me GW on 56 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS 12/10/98 | 10/5/98 reno @ -_ W 0s — - s : 7 DEVELOP PURPOSE AND NEES veer) aiare7 : ASTI ETERS | * FTRPOR oe ae RRR TET IT ESE “+ at AGENCY AEVIEW ‘ava s0isaz ot NE 108 63 PREPARE ANILGA APPLICATION ane? 10/6/87 | an Op 1018 a PREPARE DEIS 10/16/97 31/14/97 | I os FILE ANILGA APPLICATION 1018/87 10rais7 | 7 ANILGA REVIEW yoraio7 1a0s788| : 8 os - = , 8 PRINT 0515 1/2487 1oN887 | s | 70 FILE DEIS WITH EPA TIS8 “75188 nm | DIS" AIBUTE 12/2aie7 178795 73 BUBLIC REV EW - 78/98 | 2/19/88 | “ - 1 | 2 = POWER Enginaers, inc. ] Summary wv WD Micstone Sa Task Pe Project: 120376-01 Revision #3 (09202-008 CAM) oarrais7 - LL PROJECT SCHEDULE 1996 1997, 1998 1999 | 10 _|Task Name Start Finish Apr_[ May [Jun [Jul [Aug [Sep [Oct [Nov [Dec [Jan [Feb [ Mar [ Apr | May | Jun | wul_| Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec Jan | Feb [ Mar [Apr [ May J Jun [Jul [Aug [ Sep [ Oc | Nov | Dec | Jan] Feb | Mar] Apr] May | sun | ul | Aug | Sep] Oct] Nov 75 FEDERAL HEARING 175198 2119/98 1 I 20 7 | TASK6 FINAL EIS 2123/88 5/20/99 223 ® 5120 78 RESPOND TO COMMENTS 2723/98 3720/98 223 EY 3120 80 PREPARE PRELIMINARY FEIS 3/28/98 ai7198 323 47 82 ~~ AGENGY REVIEW AND APPROVE “4720188 5/8/98 «no Mi 50 84 | PREPARE FEIS 5/11/98 5/29/98 sit I 520 86 "AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 698 erizis8 on on 88 PRINT ei5/98 6/26/98 ons I 626 90 FILE FEIS WITH EPA 77898 7AI98 Om a DISTRIBUTE 6/15/98 775198 ons 73 93 PUBLIC REVIEW — 7/3/98 2/2/98 1 ME 2 5 RECORD OF DECISION 10/5/98 25/99 : [aR << 97 ‘APPEAL PERIOD 215/89 5720/98 ies cay Ace estos CMA, ppeal Perio: 99 TASK 7 STUDIES 12/15/96 78/97 100 BENEFIT ANALYSIS 37/97 TAM97 101 RELIABILITY STUDIES 37197 787 102 | ELECTRIC SYSTEM STUDIES 12/18/86 7197 103 AGENCY REVIEW —_ - 7ai97 78/97 104 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK 6/14/36 78/87 105 HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES 1496 Torta/96 108 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 7/2196 12/97 110 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS — 14/86 75/97 112 ‘SUMMARY REPORT TOrt5/96 7587 114 TASK 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING e196 9/16/97 O ons 134 UPDATE COST ESTIMATE Tisi97 71187 135 PUBLIC/AGENCY INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM 8/5/96 11/15/98 TH ins 136 INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM 116/87 RISB TH 73 137 1D TEAM FORMULATION 116187 4125/87 138 MEETINGS 114/97 7/98 138 ‘COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP 815/96 6/27/87 140 INTERVIEWS OO B5/96 To/T0/96 “4 MEEDWNS=! Peer bas TTT TIITTITITIITIITII® 4 separate Meetings [142 PUBLIC MEETING/HEARING 11/1196 2/19/98 —— ——— == WO 219 143 ‘SCOPING MEETINGS (3) — 11/11/96 11/15/96 @® 2 scoping Meetings 144 PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) 1/15/98 219/98 [IIIT] Puvtic Hearings 145 NEWSLETTERS/FACT SHEETS: 228197 11/18/98 A Neveslatiors/Fact Sheate 746 | ‘SCOPING a “4/30/97 4/3097 4190 4120 147 ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON/ANILCA APPLICATION anis7 en/97 i an Han | 148 FEIS 7198 71198 TH 71 , POWER Engineers, Inc. Summary GF__ ® Miestone e Task HE ect Ooms Project: 120376-01 Revision #3 (08203-009 D&M) oa/t2/97 PROJECT SCHEDULE POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:15AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates % Ci ID Number _ Description idl Start Finish ~~ 7”? 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-01 Subtask Description: BASE MAP/PHOTOGRAPHY 1.1.01 Reproducible Map/Atlas(using quad maps) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.02 Presentation Maps(EIS/Public Meetings) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 100 1.1.03 Color Aerial Photos(1 stereo) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-A 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":500' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-B 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":2000' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-02 Subtask Description: PUBLIC/AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS 1.2.01 File Notice of Intent with Fed Register Lead Agency 10/15/96 10/15/96 100 1.2.02 Develop MOU with Agencies Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 1/3/97 98 1.2.03 RUS Scheduled Review Times Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 1/31/97 90 1.2.04 Identify scope of issues to be addressed Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 12/31/96 96 1.2.05 Develop Preparation Plan Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 = 1/15/97 98 1.2.06 Review Preparation Plan Chugach Electric 1/15/97 = 1/31/97 95 1.2.07 40 Copies of Preparation Plan for EIS Tim Tetherow 2/20/97 2/28/97 0 1.2.08 Public Notification for Scoping Meetings Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.09 Conduct/Coordinate Agency Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 1.2.10 Conduct/Coordinate Public Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 1.2.17 1 Meeting Anchorage(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID Sau cecamien faay air = eh % Comp — oa ae 1.2.12 1 Meeting Cooper Landing(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.13 1 Meeting Soldotna(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 = 11/29/96 100 1.2.14 Attend 1 Mtg(Anch,Cooper,Soldotna) Randy Pollock 11/1/96 = 11/29/96 100 1.2.15 Prepare Mat for Public/Agency Scoping Mtg Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 41.216 Prepare Issues/Scoping Report(documentation) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 95 1217 Provide Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.18 Update Existing Public & Agency Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.19 Review & Approve Mailing List Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.20 Newsletter # 1 (prior to scoping) Tim Tetherow 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1225 Review and Approve Fact Sheet/Newsletter Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 4;2:22 Establish CWG in Anchorage Tim Tetherow 9/2/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.23 25 Key Informant Interviews(Anchorage) Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.24 12-15 Interviews Kenai/determine need for CWG Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.25 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 1.2.26 ID Team Meeting #1 (Scoping) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 1.2.27 50 Copies Executive Summary Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 1.2.28 20 Copies Environmental Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-03 Subtask Description: FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES 1.3.03 Review Alternatives Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 = 10/31/96 100 1.3.04 Field Review of Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 9/27/96 100 1.3.05 Identification of Alternatives for EIS Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable ; Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com, ID Number Description reap ban Start Finish i Pp 50% Client Final 1.3.06 Agency Meeting to finalize Alternatives Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-04 Subtask Description: SCOPING REPORT 1.4.01 Agency Review & Approval of Scoping Rpt Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 1/31/97 25 1.4.02 40 Copies of Scoping Report Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:16AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable : Milestone Dates’ , Scheduled Review Dates % Com ID Number _ Description op hate Start Finish “~~”? 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-01 Subtask Description: DATA COLLECTION 2.1.00 ID Team Mtg(Inventory Results) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 2.1.01 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 2.1.02 Inventory of Resource Data/Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 11/6/96 95 2.1.30 CWG Mtg(Inventory/Assessement Criteria Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 2.2.01 Compile and Reproduce Inventory Maps Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 85 2.2.02 Provide Associated Data Tables by Route Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 45 2.2.03 Additional Review & Documentation Tim Tetherow 5/7/97 11/20/97 55 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-03 Subtask Description: PRIVATE LANDS/PARCEL RESEARCH 2.3.01 Identify Number of Parcels for Routes Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-A 5 Routes Anchorage Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-B Tesoro Route-Kenai Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-C Tesoro Route - Soldotna (up to 3 routes) Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-D Enstar Route Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-E Quartz Creek Route - Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID Number Description Respindiy "Start Finish COP som Client Final 2.3.01-F Quartz Creek between Portage & University Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02 ID Owner,Size, Config sub cable landfall sites Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-A 3 Sites Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-B 5 Sites north side of Turnagain Arm Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.03 ID Owner,Size,Config of t Alternate Substn Sites Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-04 Subtask Description: RIGHT OF ENTRY 2.4.01 Provide Right of Entry for ElS Field Studies Frank Rowland 10/15/96 9/8/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-05 Subtask Description: PROPERTY SURVEY SUPPORT 2.5.01 Conduct Centerline Surveys Soldotna Area Frank Rowland 5/7/97 11/20/97 0 2.5.02 Conduct Centerline Surveys Bernice Lake Area Frank Rowland 5/7197 11/20/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:17AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable ; Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % C ID Number Description eee Start Finish “~~”"P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-01 Subtask Description: DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIP/LOCAT 3.1.00 Develop Project Description Tim Tetherow 7/22/96 11/8/96 90 3.1.01 ID Team Review of impact criteria, results, mtg Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 3.1.02 Attend CWG Meeting(Impact Assessement) Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 100 3.1.03 IPG Review of Impacts Chugach Electric 2/14/97 2/28/97 0 3.1.04 Final Determination of Project Description Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/8/96 80 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-02 Subtask Description: CONDUCT ASSES/MITIGATION PLAN 3.2.01 IA/MP Site Specific Models Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 11/29/96 35 3.2.02 Impact Maps & Tables Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 2/28/97 5 3.2.03 Develop/Conduct |A/MPP Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 25 3.2.03-A Define:Potential Direct/Indirect/Cumltv Impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 20 3.2.03-B Define:Interrelationships(cause/effect)impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 20 3.2.03-C Define: Criteria Definition Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 35 3.2.03-D Define: Determination of Impact Significance Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 25 3.2.04 Preliminary Mitigation Asessement(mitigation ID) Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 10 3.2.05 Review Preliminary Mitigation Criteria Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 = 11/29/96 30 3.2.06 Review Prel Assessement & Mitigation Plan Randy Pollock 1/16/98 1/31/97 0 3.2.07 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 4/1/97 4/25/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Mil n i ID Soke, ‘ascites Ren hey ea ° a aa eae so% client pat 3.2.08 Impacts Reassessed Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 0 3.2.09 Residual Impacts Determined Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 3/31/97 0 3.2.10 Finalize Results IA/MP Address Cumulative Effects Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-03 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 3.3.01 IA/MPP Incorporated into DEIS & FEIS Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.02 Mitigation Measures incorporated into ROD Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.03 Agency Review & Approval Tim Tetherow 5/15/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.04 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.05 Review & Approve Preliminary Results Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:19 AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-04 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp | %*C ID Number __ Description mop lay Start Finish ~~” ”"P 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-01 Subtask Description: ENVIRO PREFERRED ALTERNVE SELC 4.1.01 Compilation of Impact Data/by Alternative Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.02 Development of Criteria&Rte Comparison Mat Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.03 Two Day Route Comparison Meeting Tim Tetherow 4/16/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.04 ID Team Meeting(Envirn Pfrd Rte & Agency/Pro Tim Tetherow 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.05 CWG Meetings(Comparison of Alternatives) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.06 IPG Meeting Chugach Electric 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.07 Public Open House (Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-A Anchorage(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-B Cooper Landing(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-C Soldotna(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.08 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 4/21/97 4/30/97 0 4.1.09 Select Agency Preferred Route Lead Agency 5/15/97 6/13/97 0 4.1.10 Comparison & Cross Discipline rankings/Alt Corr Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/30/97 0 4.1.11 Consideration of Public & Agency Comments Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 7/18/97 0 4.1.12 Select Environmentally Preferred Alternative Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 —_ 7/18/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 4.2.01 Newsletter # 2 (Route Selection Results) Tim Tetherow 7I1/197 7131197 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-04 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Re Indi % Com IDNumber _ Description hindi Start Finish “~~~”? 50% Client _Final 4.2.02 Review & Approve Newsletter # 2 Chugach Electric 7/15/97 7/31/97 0 4.2.03 Documentation of Route Selection Process Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 8/29/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:20AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R Indi %C IDNumber _ Description “pany Start Finish “~~” ”P 50% Client _—Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-01 Subtask Description: PDEIS PREPARATION 5.1.01 ID Team Mtg # 4 (PDEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 9/1/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.02 Environmental Data Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.03 14-8 1/2 X 11 Color Map Photos Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.04 2 - 18 X 30 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.05 23 - 11 X 17 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.06 Develop Purpose and Need Statement Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.07 Prepare Preliminary DEIS Tim Tetherow 6/23/97 9/17/97 0 5.1.08 40 Copies (150 pages each) PDEIS Tim Tetherow 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.09 Distribution of Copies Chugach Electric 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.10 Review PDEIS Chugach Electric 9/1/97 9/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-02 Subtask Description: DEIS PREPARATION 5.2.01 ID Team Mtg # 5 (DEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 11/3/97 11/28/97 0 5.2.02 Compile & Incorporate Changes to PDEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 5.2.03 Finalize DEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 §.2.04 Review DEIS Lead Agency 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 5.2.05 Review & Approve DEIS Chugach Electric 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates ‘Resp Indi % Com; ID Number _ Description esp indy Start Finish “~~7"P 50% Client _ Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DISTRIBUTE 5.3.01 Provide Lead Agency Signature Lead Agency 1/14/98 3/16/98 0 5.3.02 File with EPA Tim Tetherow 1/14/98 3/20/98 0 5.3.03 Print & Distribute DEIS Tim Tetherow 12/22/97 1/9/98 0 5.3.04 200 Copies(150 pgs/each) to Lead Fed Agency Tim Tetherow 1/26/98 1/30/98 0 5.3.05 Publish Notices of Availability Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.3.06 Distribute Copies to Interested Parties & Agencies Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.4.01 ID Team Meeting # 6 (Pre-Hearing) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.02 Newsletter # 3 (Announce Public Hearings) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.03 Review & Approve Newsletter # 3 Chugach Electric 1/15/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.04 Schedule & Conduct Public Hearing # 1 Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-A Anchorage Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-B Cooper Landing Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-C Soldotna Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.05 Public/Agency Review of DEIS Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.06 Recieve/Compile Public Comments on DEIS Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.07 Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.08 Attend Federal Hearings Tim Tetherow 2/16/98 3/11/98 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:21AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indi % Com ID Number _ Description een Start Finish “~~” ”P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-01 Subtask Description: PFEIS PREPARATION 6.1.01 Newsletter(Announce FEIS) Tim Tetherow 7/1/98 7/31/98 0 6.1.02 ID Team Mtg(Rvw Comments) Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 3/31/98 0 6.1.03 Respond to comments Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 4/17/98 0 6.1.04 Prepare PFEIS Tim Tetherow 4/20/98 5/20/98 0 6.1.05 ID Team Mtg(Review PFEIS) Tim Tetherow 5/1/98 5/29/98 0 6.1.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.07 Review PFEIS Chugach Electric 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.08 40 Copies of PFEIS Tim Tetherow 5/11/98 5/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-02 Subtask Description: FEIS PREPARATION 6.2.01 Compile & Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.2.02 Prepare FEIS Tim Tetherow 6/11/98 7/3/98 0 6.2.03 Review & Approve FEIS Chugach Electric 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 6.2.04 Provide Lead Agency Signature Tim Tetherow 8/10/98 8/20/98 0 6.2.05 Prepare FEIS for Printing Tim Tetherow 7/28/98 8/18/98 0 6.2.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask pd ——a—aaaEaEEeEeEeEEEEEEE———EEEEE Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv ' % Com| IDNumber _ Description P Start Finish ~~”? 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DOCUMENTATION 6.3.01 Print & Distribute FEIS Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 6.3.02 200 Copies for Distribution Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC REVIEW 6.4.01 FEIS Available to Public Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 6.4.02 Public Review Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-05 Subtask Description: RECORD OF DECISION 6.5.01 File FEIS with EPA Lead Agency 8/20/98 9/2/98 0 6.5.02 Record of Decision Lead Agency 7/6/98 8/28/98 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:22 AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Rospiindiv Milestone Dates % Com Scheduled Review Dates ‘o IDNumber _ Description . Start Finish P 50% Client —_ Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-05 Subtask Description: INDUCTIVE COORDINATION STUDIES 7.5.01 Summary Report William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 50 7.5.02 Recommend Dsg Parameters William Riall 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 70 7.5.03 Telephone Contacts William Riall 75/96 = 8/14/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-06 Subtask Description: EMF CALCULATIONS 7.6.01 EMF Models Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 20 7.6.02 EIS & Prelim Eng Calculations Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 0 7.6.03 Text & Graphs or Charts-ElS Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 20 7.6.04 RFI/TVI & Audible Noise Analysis Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 = 8/14/97 0 7.6.05 Attendance at Public Hearings (Mike Silva) Larry Henriksen 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-07 Subtask Description: CATHODIC PROTECTION 7.7.01 Summary Report William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 90 7.7.02 Recommend Design Parameters William Riall 7/5/96 8/14/97 90 7.7.03 Office Visit to Pipeline-Anchorage William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 100 7.7.04 Telephone Contact of Pipeline : William Riall 75/96 8/14/97 60 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable f Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv % Com; ID Number Description P Start Finish ° P 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-01 Subtask Description: ALTERNATE LOAD STUDIES 7.1.01 Determine System Requirements Ronald Beazer 7/1196 12/31/96 98 7.1.02 Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 7/1/96 12/13/96 98 7.1.03 Meeting with IPG Members Ronald Beazer 8/5/96 8/6/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-02 Subtask Description: SYSTEM OUTAGE(N-1) 7.2.01 Emergency Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 7/1196 = 12/13/96 98 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-03 Subtask Description: DYNAMIC STABILITY 7.3.01 Dynamic Stability Analysis Ronald Beazer 7/1196 12/13/96 98 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-04 Subtask Description: SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES REPORT 7.4.01 10 Copies Draft Report Section Ronald Beazer 11/25/96 12/6/96 0 7.4.02 IPG Teleconference Ronald Beazer 12/2/96 12/9/96 0 7.4.03 Final Report Section Ronald Beazer 12/9/96 12/13/96 15 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:23 AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R Indi % Com IDNumber _ Description esp aa” Start Finish ~~ ”"”"P 50% ~— Client __Final Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-01 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES 8.1.01 Hydrographic Rpt Bottom Profiles William Riall 6/14/96 = 10/14/96 100 8.1.02 One Mobilization-Hydrographic Subcontractor William Riall 6/14/96 8/15/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-02 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC SUPERVISION 8.2.01 Report Findings of Investigations William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.02 Work Log of Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.03 Field Eng Present During Hydro Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.04 Analyze Data-Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.05 Feasibility Submarine Cable Crossings William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.2.06 Assessment of Cable Embedment Opt. William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.2.07 Recommend Prelim Cable Const William Riall 10/1/96 10/14/96 35 8.2.08 Prelim Recommend-Armoring & Install William Riall 10/1/96 10/14/96 35 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-03 Subtask Description: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 8.3.01 Geotechnical Information Summary Larry Henriksen 11/1/96 1/2/97 0 8.3.02 Review Existing Geotech Data Larry Henriksen 7/1196 1/2/97 5 8.3.03 Review Construction & Operations Experience Larry Henriksen 71196 1/2/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Milestone Dates i ID suniten, Pesci se diaeeael Start Finish = °O™P “3 tha pie 8.3.04 Arrange For & Use Geotech Larry Henriksen 7/1196 1/2/97 0 8.3.05 Visit to Enstar's Offices Lower 48 William Rial 7/1196 1/2/97 0 8.3.06 Visit to Tesoro's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 7/1196 1/2/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-04 Subtask Description: FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 8.4.01 Summarize Field Notes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.02 Field Observations-Environ Personnel Tim Tetherow 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 70 8.4.03 Field Observations-Eng Personnel Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.04 Identify Propective Centerline Locations Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 60 8.4.05 Identify Potential Mitigation Methods Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.06 Identify Most Appropriate Structure Types Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 75 8.4.07 Select Submarine Cable Landfall Locations William Riall 6/14/96 8/15/97 80 8.4.08 Identify Tech or Environmental Challenges Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.09 Note Other Observed Features Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.10 Fixed Wing Aircraft Overflight-ID'd Routes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 — 8/1/96 100 8.4.11 3 Days Helicopter Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.12 9 Days on Ground Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.13 Detailed Field Review/Alternatives in Table 1 Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-05 Subtask Description: SUMMARY OF FIELD REPORT 8.5.01 Copies of Summary Field Report Michael Walbert 10/15/96 2/13/98 15 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable : : Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv % Com ID Number Description P Start Finish ° P 50% Client Final 8.5.02 Prelim Submarine Cable Recommendations William Riall 6/14/96 =—.2/13/98 30 8.5.03 Observations & Conclusions Impacting Project William Riall 6/14/96 =. 2/13/98 30 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Thu, Apr 17,1997 10:24AM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable 7 Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates R %C ID Number Description ony inci Start Finish ae 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-07 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DESIGN-SUBSTATIONS 9.07.01 One-Line and General Arrangement Drawings Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 65 9.07.02 Modify Existing General Arrangement Plans Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 65 9.07.03 Identify & Note Bus Connct & Phasing on DWGS Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 65 9.07.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maintenance Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 65 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-08 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRTRIA-REACT 9.08.01 Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/97 10 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-09 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-REACITVE COMP 9.09.01 Modify One Lines and General Arrangements Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 9.09.02 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 40 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-10 Subtask Description: COST EST-SUBMARINE CABLES 9.10.01 Cost Estimates William Riall 1/15/97 = 5/14/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indi % Com; ID Number Description —— Start Finish i P 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-13 Subtask Description: COST EST-REACTIVE COMPENSATION 9.13.01 Cost Estimate Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 10 9.13.02 Compile/Review Vendor Support Data Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 10 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-14 Subtask Description: COST EST-R O W ACQUISITION 9.14.01 3 Identified Alternative Routes Cost Estimates Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.02 Develop Land Costs Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.03 Develop Labor/Exp Costs to Acquire Easements Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-01 Subtask Description: MANUFAC/UTIL SITE VISIT-SUBMAR 9.01.01 Manufacturer & Factory Inspections William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.02 Utility Specific Operating Data William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.03 1- 7 Day Trip for 2 people to Denmark William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-02 Subtask Description: PRELIM DESIGN & SPEC-SUB CABLE 9.02.01 Preliminary Design Parameters William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 10 9.02.02 Preliminary Performance Specs William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 10 9.02.03 Determine Const/Operation/Main Requirements William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 10 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable . Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Resp Indiv % Com; ID Number Description P Start Finish ° ’ 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-03 Subtask Description: SUMMARY CABLE REPORT 9.03.01 10 Copies of Summary Report William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.02 Recommend Specific Cable Type William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.03 Recommend Most Probable Method of Installation William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-04 Subtask Description: SUBMARINE/LAND CBL TRAN SITES 9.04.01 Preliminary Site Specific Arrangements William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.02 Engineering Sketches of Transition Station William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.03 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/10 Sub CBL Landfalls William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.04 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/2 Transiton Sites William Riall 1/1197 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-05 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-O H LINE 9.05.01 Preliminary Design for Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 80 9.05.02 Prel DSGN for DBL Circuit Single Pole Structures Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 80 9.05.03 Est/Dist Underbuilt to Single Pole Struct Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 80 9.05.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 80 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-06 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRIT-SUBSTAT 9.06.01 Site Visits . Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 8/30/96 100 9.06.02 Data Acquisition/Drawing Collection Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 10/15/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Number Description Resp indy "Start Finish COMP Soy chent Final 9.06.03 Schedule and Attend Meetings Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 9.06.04 Provide Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 80 9.06.05 One Mobilization/Office Visit Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-11 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-O H LINE 9.11.01 Cost Estimates guyed "X" Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.02 Cost Estimates Single Stl Pole Single Circuit Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.03 Cost Estimates Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.04 Cost Estimates DBL Circuit Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.05 Cost Est Addition of Underbuilt to Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.06 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.07 Summary Cost Report Larry Henriksen 4/15/97 5/14/97 25 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-12 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-SUBSTATIONS 9.12.01 Cost Estimate for 2 New Endpoints Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.12.02 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 —- 5/14/97 0 9.12.03 Summary Cost Report Stanley Sostrom 4/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-23-09-15 Subtask Description: SUMMARY COST REPORT 9.15.01 15 Copies Summary Reports Michael Walbert 4/15/97 5/14/97 0 AIN7/ST7 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 4-12-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 SCOPING Actual % Work Completed 5% 20% 28% _ 33%] 51% 72% 77%) 93%| 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 2% 25% 26%| —sss33%| 52% 74% 87%| 93%| __—: 100% 100%| —- 100%| =: 100% 100% ~ 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 30% 30% 33%. 51% 68% 77% 93% 99% foe Base Planned $ (this period) $6,743 $81,045 $2,745 $25,645 $67,045 $75,045 $46,045 $23,645 $23,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A $67,538 $60,112 $27,222 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $15,925 $89,330 ($558) $9,848 $63,340 $42,082 $67,538 $59,509 $25,800 $0 $0 ns) $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $6,743 $87,788 «$90,533 | $116,178| $183,223| $258,268] $304,313 $327,958 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050] $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A, N/A N/A NIA NWA| $287,505 | $347,617 | _ $374,839 $374,839 | —$374,839| $374,839 | —$374,830| $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) $15,925 $105,255 $104,697 $114,545 $177,885 $219,967 $287,505 $347,014 $372,814 Le Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 | $351,050] $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,080] $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 | _$351,050| $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget _ N/A N/A N/A NAL N/A NA $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050] $351,050| $351,050 $351,050| $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 $374,839 | _$374,839| $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $335,125 $245,795 | $246,353 $236,505 $173,165 $131,083 $87,334 $27,825 $2,025 ee | es 2 INVENTORY Actual % Work Completed 0%| = B% 25% 45% 60% 67% 73%| 80% 87% ae "Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 5% 23% 53%| 73% B83% = 4% BAM] BAM B4% 87% 95% 100%] | 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) | __ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73% 82% 85% 86%) 89% 92% 96% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 5% 24% 43% 58% 72% 73%| 78% 87% | Base Planned $ (this period) $941 $29,444 $121,000 | $200,500 | $129,500 $69,768 $5,000 | $0 $0 $1,000 $16,500 $52,000 $34,056 $1,000 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A NAL ONAL OWN $19,728 $58,932 «$20,240 —__ $3,000| _ $17,500 $19,000 $29,613 $26,975 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0) $32,162 $124,454 | $129,043 | _ $100,796 $89,331 $19,728 $33,908 $63,502 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 i Base Planned $ (to date) $941 $30,382 $151,382 | $351,882 $481,382 | $551,150] $556,150] $556,150 | $556,150 $557,150 | _$573,650| $625,650 $659,706 | _ $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) 2 INA N/A __N/A N/A N/A NA| $495,514 $554,446 | $574,686 $586,503 | $604,003 | $623,003 $652,616 $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $32,162 $156,616 | _$285,659| $386,455 | $475,786 | —_— $495,514 $529,422 | $592,924 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | _$660,706| $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A\ N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget $660,706 | $628,544 $504,090 $375,047 | $274,251 $184,920 $184,077 $150,169 $86,667 : 3 _|IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING | Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5%] __ 7% 10% 16% | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 25% 40% 50% 60% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) NA N/A N/A N/A N/A] NA 7% 20% 37% 69% 82% 89%| «96% 99% Actual % Expended $ (to date) ___ 0%| 0%! 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 9%! 16% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 | $0 $29,000 $30,000 $85,000 | $90,000 $57,000 ‘$58,000 $90,000 $28,010 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned § (this period) N/A| N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A $10,408 $81,590 | $99,490 $88,030 $78,700 $42,295 $37,600 $18,000 Actual § Expended (this period) $0 $383 $64 $0 $5,788 | __- $23,901 $10,408 $14,998 $41,883 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 — $0 $0 $29,000 $59,000 | _$144,000| $234,000| $291,000| $349,000 $566,000 $584,010] $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) NA N/A| N/A NANA N/A $40,544 $122,134 | $221,624 $421,024 $499,724 | $542,019 $579,619 | $597,619 Actual $ Expended (to date) __ $0 $383 $447 $447 | $6,235 $30,136 $40,544 $55,542 $97,425 89 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010, $584,010| —$584,010| $584,010] —$584,010| $584,010 $564,010 | $564,010| $584,010] $584,010 | $584,010 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A _ N/A N/A N/A, NIA $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 ‘Total Task NTE Budget _ $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010| $584,010| $584,010 $584,010 | $606,612 | $606,612 | _ $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 | __ $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget $584,010 | $583,627 $583,563 $583,563 $577,775 $553,874 $566,068 $551,070 $509,187 6, | | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 1 4/17/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 4-12-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 38RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| _JUN/JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Actual % Work Completed ee 0% WOO 76 | ean Oc! seein O70 | 0%| _ 0% ae) ie Lh le aA all eee Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 35% 61% 80% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 5% 15% _49% 71% 91% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%} Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,400 $74,400 $77,400 $58,400 $60,875 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $15,000 $35,000 $62,000 $72,000 $69,000 $29,972 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $1,369 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,400 $106,800 $184,200 $242,600 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,369 $16,369 $51,369 $165,369 $237,369 $306,369 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $335,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget $303,475 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $334,972 $334,972 $334,972 E 5. DRAFT EIS i Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%) Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%] 3% 4% 11% 19% 34% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 1% 1%| Eee 2% 13% 32% 43% Actual % Expended § (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% O%|- Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 |: $5,772 $1,582 $31,570 $31,570 $57,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $0 $4,000 $0 $43,300 $78,052 $42,017 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 | $13,116 $14,698 $46,268 $77,838 $135,408 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $6,100 | $19,100 $10,100 $53,400 $131,452 $173,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | 6 FINAL EIS Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%] Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 0% _ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% O%| Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NWA $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 | __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 ; $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A]. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 it Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 2 4/17/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 4-12-97 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 3 38RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 ~ 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 38RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 7 STUDIES : Actual % Work Completed af oy 2 Be TEA ee (A Se ES ee es _ 35%! 48% a pe es Jae ee Pee meek Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 9% 21% 51% 73% 73% 73% 76% _ 80% 83% 87% 91% 91% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 38% 55% 56% 67% 78% 89% 90% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 3% 7% 7% 8% 14% 27% 33% 47% Base Planned $ (this period) $927 $3,927 $4,427 $12,200 $30,325 $22,780 $0 $0 $2,300 $2,280 $2,300 $4,139 $4,175 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) _ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $13,352 $10,492 $18,035 $500 $11,156 $11,300 $11,207 $802 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $2,569 $4,177 $637 $1,148 $5,705 $13,352 $5,455 $14,793 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $927 $4,854 $9,281 $21,481 $51,806 $74,586 $74,586 $74,586 $76,886 $81,466 $83,766 $87,905 $92,080 $92,080 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $27,588 $38,080 $56,115 | $57,115 $68,271 $79,571 $90,778 $91,580 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $2,569 $6,746 $7,383 $8,531 $14,236 $27,588 $33,043 $47,836 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A} _N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget $101,480 $98,911 $94,734 $94,097 $92,949 $87,244 $73,892 $68,437 $53,644 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Actual % Work Completed 5% 15% 50% 60% 70% 74% 77% 79% 84% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 5% 18% 52% 63% 68% 78% 86% 91% 91% 91% 94% 97% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77% 719% 81% 81% 88% 95% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 13% 48% 60% 70% 74% 77% 79% 84% Base Planned §$ (this period) $9,600 $27,600 $68,900 $20,980 $10,800 $20,680 | $16,600 $9,955 $0 $0 $5,500 $5,500 $6,540 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $7,645 $4,000 $2,601 $0 $15,000 $14,000 $10,026 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,330 $17,007 $69,770 $23,487 $20,840 $7,949 $7,645 $2,827 $10,789 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $9,600 $37,200 $106,100 $127,080 $137,880 $158,560 $175,160 $185,115 $185,115 $185,115 $190,615 $196,115 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $157,028 $161,028 $163,629 | $163,629 $178,629 $192,629 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,330 $27,337 $97,107 $120,594 $141,434 $149,383 $157,028 $159,855 $170,644 _Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $192,325 $175,318 $105,548 $82,061 $61,221 $53,272 $45,627 $42,800 $32,011 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Actual % Work Completed 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17%| 18% 20% 25% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 2% 4% 9% 23% 31% 44% 57% 71% 97% 98% 98% 98% 98% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 36% 53% 85% 98% 98% 98% 98% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% 24% Base Planned $ (this period) $2,580 $2,137 $2,137 $10,337 $27,417 $14,557 $23,697 $25,557 $26,837 $15,076 $2,132 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,937 $33,000 $33,000 $25,000 $25,330 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $1,694 $0 $1,080 $0 $20,307 $9,513 $1,937 $2,746 $8,432 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,580 $4,717 $6,854 $17,191 $44,608 $59,165 $82,862 | $108,419 $135,256 | $183,729 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $34,531 $67,531 $100,531 $160,531 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,694 $1,694 $2,774 $2,774 $23,081 $32,594 $34,531 $37,277 $45,709 |. Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A]. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $188,167 $188,167 $187,087 $187,087 $166,780 $157,267 $155,330 $152,584 $144,152 | 4/17/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 4-1 2-97 38RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 ° 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH} JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 ie Actual % Work Completed | 1% B%| «12% 18% 24%| 80% 33%] 88%] 40% et ee eels a Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 12% 22% 31% 41% 47% 51% 55% 64% 69% 74% 79% 83% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33% 42% 49% 62% 69% 75% 81% 84% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 6% 12% 18% 24% 30% 33% 37% 42% Base Planned $ (this period) $20,791 $144,150 $199,209 $298,662 $295,087 $287,830 $181,342 $116,157 $116,001 $147,528 $130,424 $170,609 $134,741 $119,445 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $120,608 $269,226 $235,588 $182,530 $219,686 $198,895 $196,470 $87,794 Actual $ Expended (this period) $27,949 $142,820 $198,987 $163,015 $212,219 $178,481 $120,608 $119,443 $165,199 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $20,791 $164,941 $364,150 $662,812 $957,899 $1,245,729 $1,427,071 $1,543,228 $1,659,229 $1,960,026 | $2,090,450 $2,261,059 $2,395,800 $2,515,245 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A] $1,044,079 $1,313,305 | $1,548,893 $1,939,110 $2,158,796 | $2,357,691 $2,554,161 $2,641,955 Actual $ Expended (to date) $27,949 $170,769 $369,756 $532,771 $744,990 $923,471 $1,044,079 $1,163,522 | $1,328,721 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget $3,015,474 $2,872,654 $2,673,667 $2,510,652 | $2,298,433 $2,119,952 $2,102,391 $1,982,948 | $1,817,749 BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $364,150 $881,579 $413,500 $431,221 $424,795 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,245,729 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $609,903 $483,159 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $405,250 $131,611 $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 4 ATIST SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT ' THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT aed 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 ° 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1 SCOPING | Actual % Wark Completed wea! a : ge ae een eee eee | Ele _ a Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) | __—=—=—100%|. 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100%] == 100% = 100% = 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0] $0 $0 $0 ___—$0| $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 = 780 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0) Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) | __—-$351,050/ $351,050| $351,050 $351,050 $351,050] $351,050] $351,050] —$351,050| $351,050] $351,050, $351,050| $351,050] $351,050] $351,050| $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839} $374,839 «$374,839 | «$374,839 | _— $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839| $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839] —$374,839| $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) : I Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | —_ $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 _ $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 __ $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget 7 2 INVENTORY | Actual % Work Completed eee | po ee : le ie Cl ees Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100%) 100%| 100% 100% 100%} 100% 100%| =: 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 4100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%] ———- 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | Base Planned $(thisperiod) | $0, = $0} $0] OF $0 $0 $0 | $0 $o| $0 $0 $0. $0. $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $660,706 | $660,706] $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | — $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 | _ $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $679,591 | ‘$679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 | _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget _ $18,885 | —$18,885| $18,885 | $18,885. $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 | $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget —s|_—« $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 _ $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget | | : ce 3 _ IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PL | | Actual % Work Completed | i 5 ae a Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%] 100% 100% | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev, 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%) _ 100% 100% 100%) 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 7 Base Planned $ (this period) St) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0; $0 $0 | $0 $o| $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $8,993 $0 $0 $0 $0} $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 S0l 5s to $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $(todate) _—|_—* $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 | _$e06,ei2| $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 $6035,812| —$608,612| __$008,612| _$606,612| $606,612 Actual $ Expended (to date) | EE a Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | ___ $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | ‘$22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | _—- $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget _—|__—$606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612 | se0eet2| Se08e12| se0ee12| s606612) Se05.c12| $606,612| S606612| $608,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget . | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 5 4/17/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT lea 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 ° 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION | Actual % Work Completed oa oo ee os lee ne [bes te - = Eenice Sete 7 ee ae CA Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100%, 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%} =: 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100%; =: 100%) ___ 100% 100% 100% ___ 100%| 100% 100%; =: 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | | Base Planned $ (this period) —_| $0 go. ~———s«$50 $0 $0 | $0 $0 POR eee ee o0 $0 $0] $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev.1 Planned $(this period) | $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0) ee $0 | $0 $o| ss $0 $0 __ $0] $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | _ $303,475 $303,475 | _ $303,475 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,344 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) | ___Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 |___ CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget | $32,866 | $32,866 | $32,866] $32,866| $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,344 _ $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual Remaining Task Budget ‘ae ae 5 DRAFT EIS Actual % Work Completed after esc ee css fe Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) BO) bevel es 6086 (fr 6670 ae. 85% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%} = 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 59% 66% 73% 85% 92% | 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% __ 100% 100%| _ 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $42,570 $18,742 $0 $0 $0: Es Teo | $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) =| ——- $66,200 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 | $30,001 $1,904 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 | __ $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $199,978 $221,548 $241,118 $266,688 $341,258 $383,828 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 —- $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | __-Rev.1Planned$(todate) —«|_—‘ $239,669 $268,669 $297,669 $347,569 $375,569 $405,570 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | _ $402,570 | $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $4,904 _ $4,904 | $4,904 | $4,904| ss $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 __ $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget | $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget | 6 FINAL EIS | Actual % Work Completed ee ee |e tt aaa eee Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 16% 26% 50% 60%| ss 74% 84% 94% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17% 40% 53%] 73% 86%! 90% | 93% 96% 98% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 ___ $0 ee OS $0 | $0 $39,100 $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 $35,100 $24,600 $24,600 $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $o, ss FO | _ $0} ss $0] =~ 80] $42,900 $55,563 $33,700 _ $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $8,700 $6,660 $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,100 $64,200 | $123,800 $148,900 $184,000 | $208,600 $233,200 $247,616 $247,616 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900 $98,463 $132,163 $180,229 $214,033 | $222,233 [$230,933 $237,593 $243,756 $247,616 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A, N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA N/A N/A; N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget _ | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget | - Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 6 4/17/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 4-12-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 ~- 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR _ APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 7 STUDIES Actual % Work Completed aL _| PB esl eee ile Mee te jemi He Te ||| ehiel Me Wed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 96% 96%| —=—«96% 96%] 96%| 96%! ~=—S—100%| ~=—=—=« 100% 100%| 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $97,460 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget a a 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Actual % Work Completed s Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A _N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Line Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 7 4/17/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 4-12-97 TASK 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 _-.___—Actual % Work Completed _ ii] TU ea | ae ee ee eee eet Ee ise |e ics fe Be | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 85% 85% 86% 87% 89% 91% 93% 94% 96% 96% 28% 99% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 86% 87% 88% 90% 91% 93% 95% 96% 98% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $47,970 $57,842 $25,100 $59,600 $25,100 $35,100 $28,600 $28,600 $14,416 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $75,193 $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $78,801 $57,467 $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $12,700 $10,660 $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,579,815 | $2,601,385 | $2,620,955 | _ $2,646,525 | $2,721,095 | _ $2,769,065 | $2,826,907 | $2,852,007 | $2,911,607 | $2,936,707 | $2,971,807 $3,000,407 | $3,029,007 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $2,717,148 | $2,746,148 | $2,775,148 | _ $2,825,048 | $2,853,048 | _ $2,931,849 | $2,989,317 | $3,023,017 | $3,071,082 | $3,104,886 | $3,113,086 $3,125,786 | $3,136,446 | $3,142,609 | $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 | _ Total Project NTE Budget $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 |_ $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | _ $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $105,710 $148,110 $142,542 $88,800 $43,016 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,375,226 $422,468 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $133,193 $156,701 $139,233 $54,704 $20,683 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,851,677 $371,321 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $536,861 ‘ $0 , Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 8 1448-70181-97-K010 Collection Agreement between oA aon Chugach Electric Association, Inc. and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 7 - Alaska This agreement is made and entered into by Chugach Electric Association, Inc., operating under the June 8, 1993 Memorandum of Understanding In Aid of Beginning Activities to Build the Southern Intertie, as agent for the Alaska Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc., The Municipality of Anchorage d/b/a Municipal Light and Power, Chugach Electric Association, The Municipality of Fairbanks d/b/a Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System, Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc., The City of Seward d/b/a Seward Electric System, The Homer Electric Association, Inc., and The Matanuska Electric Association, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Participating Utilities” and represented by the Intertie Participants Group (IPG), hereinafter referred to as the Cooperator, and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, acting through the Regional Director, hereinafter referred to as the Fish and Wildlife Service, under the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of October 15, 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee, 80 Stat. 927). A. PURPOSE: The Cooperator and the Fish and Wildlife Service enter into this agreement in order to complete the resource analysis and location design for the proposed Souther Intertie electric transmission line project. This agreement outlines the responsibilities of the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Cooperator. B. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC INTEREST AND BENEFIT: The Cooperator desires to gather resource information necessary to satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act and Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act requirements for obtaining right-of-way necessary for construction of an electrical transmission line between Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula. The Fish and Wildlife Service must assure that all potential impacts to resource values under Fish and Wildlife Service administration are considered, and all laws for managing those resources are followed during the environmental analysis phase of this project. It is mutually beneficial to the Cooperator and the Fish and Wildlife Service to use the optimum means available of insuring that the environmental analysis will be developed in a timely manner C \ANNALISASWPDUCS £99908 PHIBUSFWS AGR Revised: January 24, 1997 Page | of 4 that minimizes the costs to the Cooperator and the Fish and Wildlife Service. In consideration of the above premises, the parties hereto agree as follows: (Ge COOPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Reimburse the Fish and Wildlife Service for the full cost of expediting the environmental analysis and right-of-way decision process for the proposed project. Fish and Wildlife Service project costs will be estimated in a financial plan (attached), for each fiscal year (October 1 through September 30) of the project, and approved by the Cooperator. Estimated Fish and Wildlife Service project costs will contain administrative costs, including indirect costs at the current rate of 19 percent. Make quarterly payment to the Fish and Wildlife Service within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for the amount expended, up to the amount specified in the approved financial plan. Payment shall be made to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Finance Center P.O. Box 25207 Denver, Colorado 80225-0207 Provide to the Fish and Wildlife Service copies of all resource evaluations and reports related to this project according to time lines agreed to by both parties. D. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE RESPONSIBILITIES: ie Establish an accounting system for tracking charges associated with this agreement. Bill the Cooperator quarterly for work, including administration costs, performed according to the approved financial plan. Invoices will be sent to: Chugach Electric Association, Inc., P.O. Box 196300, Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300. As specified in a separate memorandum of agreement, or other such accord which may be developed, participate in the resource analyses toward completion of required NEPA documentation. Expedite the Service’s decision process following an application by the Cooperator for right-of-way authorization. ' ANNALISASEPDOCS 9990001 PHTTB USFIN AUR. Revised: January 24, 1997 Page 2 of 4 E. AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATION: Li Modifications within the scope of the instrument shall be made by mutual consent of the parties, through issuance of a written modification, signed and dated by both parties, prior to any changes being performed. No obligation shall be incurred for any changes not properly approved in advance. This instrument is executed as of the last date shown below, expires on December 31, 1998, and may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties. The principal contacts for this instrument are: For Fish and Wildlife Service: For Chugach Electric Association: Brian Anderson Dora L. Gropp Division of Realty Chugach Electric Association, Inc. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 19630 1011 E. Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 762-4626 (907) 786-3379 Fax: (907) 562-0027 (907) 786-3901 Either party may terminate this agreement upon written notice. The Fish and Wildlife Service will not incur any new obligations beyond the effective date of termination. The Cooperator hereby agrees to defend and hold harmless the Fish and Wildlife Service, its representatives or employees, from any damage incident to the performance of the work resulting from, related to, or arising from this instrument. This instrument in no way restricts the Fish and Wildlife Service or the Cooperator from participating in similar activities with other public or private agencies, organizations, and individuals. No part of this instrument shall entitle the Cooperator to any share or interest in the project other than the right to use and enjoy the same under the existing regulations of the Fish and Wildlife Service. C\ANNALISASWPDOCS £99908 PHL BUSFWS AGR Revised: January 24, 1997 Page 3 of 4 In witness thereof, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date of the last signature. For the Fish and Wildlife Service: For the COOPERATOR: R doe Them ce vs deting RegionaMDirector Date EUG - BJORN: DA Chugach Electric Association, Construction Manager, solely as agent for Alaska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc., 254 7 tee Municipality of Anchorage d/b/a Municipal Light and Power, Chugach Electric Association, Inc., the Municipality of Fairbanks d/b/a Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System, Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc., the City of Seward d/b/a Seward Electric System, the Homer Electric Association, Inc., and the Matanuska Electric Association, Inc., “Participating Utilities” and represented by the Intertie Participants Group (IPG). ontracting General Services (CANNALISA. DOCS E9S9008 NPHIBUSFWS ACR Revised: January 24, 1997 Page 4 of 4 Attachment Financial Plan Southern Intertie Environmental Analysis/ Right-of-way Permit Processing U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 7 - Alaska Fiscal Year is October 1 through September 30. Salary and fringe benefits based on staff specialist rate at $300.00 per day. Indirect costs are 19 percent of direct costs. ivi t Fiscal Year 1997 irect 1. Cooperative agreement preparation/review (2 days) $ 600.00 2. Inter-agency coordination meetings @ 4 hours each 10 meetings 1,500.00 3. NEPA document preparation/review: Scoping Report (2 days) 600.00 Inventory (4 days) 1,200.00 Impact assessment (4 days) 1,200.00 DEIS review (5 days) 1,500.00 4. Automation, reproduction, etc. — 200.00 Subtotal $6,800.00 irect 19% of Subtotal $1,292.00 FY ‘97 TOTAL $8,092.00 C\ANNALISAWPDUCS E999008 PHIBUSFWS EST Revised: January 24, 1997 Page | of 2 Fiscal Year 1998 Direct Costs 1. Public Hearing - Washington, D.C. Travel and Per Diem $ 1,300.00 4 days 1,200.00 2. Inter-agency coordination meetings @ 4 hours each 10 meetings 1,500.00 3. NEPA document preparation/review: DEIS comments (3 days) 900.00 FEIS review (2 days) 600.00 4. ROW application processing: Application fee 300.00 Compatibility determination (10 days) 3,000.00 Subsistence evaluation (2 days) 600.00 Cultural resources evaluation (10 days) 3,000.00 CZM Consistency determination (1 day) 300.00 Appraisal (10 days) —3.000.00 Subtotal $15,700.00 Indirect Costs 19% of Subtotal -£ 2,983.00 FY ‘98 TOTAL $18,683.00 Fiscal Year 1999 Direct Costs 1. Record of Decision (2 days) $ 600.00 2. ROW Permit preparation (5 days) $1,500.00 Subtotal $ 2,100.00 Indirect Costs 19% of Subtotal $_399.00 FY ‘99 TOTAL $2,499.00 GRAND TOTAL $29,274.00 CAANNALISAWPDOCIED 99008 1PHIBUSFWS EST Revised: January 24, 1997 Page 2 of 2 Thursday, February 13, 1997 04:45:11 AM — Chugach National Forest Page 1 of 1 CEA Contract #96-265 Amendment #1 Revised 02/13/97 4:39 PM FINANCIAL PLAN SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT INTERIM PHASE COLLECTION AGREEMENT 96CC-10-04-023 The estimated project cost to the Cooperator of $29,684 is broken down as follows: Personnel Costs DAYS Cost/Day Total Cost Cultural Resources Ss $277 $1,385 Fisheries Biologist 3 $252 $756 Forest Project Coordinator 20 $277 $5,540 Geologist 2 $221 $442 GIS Coordinator 2 $226 $452 GIS Staff 5 $211 $1,055 Hydrologist 3 $246 $738 Lands Specialist 4 $267 $1,068 Landscape Architect s $269 $1,345 NEPA Coordinator 4 $274 $1,096 Public Affairs 3 $150 $450 Recreation Specialist 3 $269 $807 Staff Officers 3 $320 $960 Wildlife Biologist 5 $277 $1,385 OGC 2 $380 $760 RO Staff 2 $350 $700 Total Personnel Costs $18,939 Travel/Transportation and related costs Co-lead Travel $4,000 Meeting and Site Inspections $500 : Equipment 7 None Identified so Supplies None Identified so Other Direct Costs Computer Time $500 Indirect Costs Overhead cost at 24% $5,745 TOTAL INTERIM COST $29,684 Subsequent Calculations And Deposits Revision of this Financial Plan and additional deposits will occur when the account balance drops below $500 or the evaluation progresses to levels requiring more involvement from the Forest Service. For the FOREST SERVICE For the Intertie Participants Group 47 Cee VN mL affa y "EUGENE N, BIORNSTAD\ N271%/Q7T THE 1h-Ar (TY /RY NON KR7RQa1