The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutS Intertie report 5-1997lectric ASSOCIATION, INC. CHUGACH ELECTRIC Y Bs ASSOCIATION, INC. Ce zs VEGEIVE |) MAY 29 1997 Alaska Industrial Development Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority and Export Authority 480 West Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503-6690 May 27, 1997 Attention: Mr. Randy Simmons, Executive Director Subject: Southern Intertie Monthly Report for May 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Dear Mr. Simmons: Please find enclosed 1 (one) copy of the Southern Intertie Report for the Month of May 1997. If there are any questions, please contact Dora Gropp, (907) 762-4626. Sincerely, Eugene N. Bjornstad General Manager ENGIDfé:ahw Enclosures: 1 (one) copy of Southern Intertie Monthly Report c: Lee Thibert Joe Griffith Michael Massin Dora Gropp John Cooley Mike Cunningham Don Edwards W.O.#E9590081, Sec., 2.1.3 RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * PO. Box 196300 * Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska SOUTHERN INTERTIE Report for the Month of MAY 1997 Il. iil. Report for the Month of May 1997 W.0.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUIMIMARY) 5! 5 5 o: 5 sto5 5 sasla (a is 5 oo (a) 90) si-assel 5:5] 4! 5a fo fo 6) 8/51 6) lol a: bay whem, et erlethe I-1 INANCIARL, {5 5/6 subicsl issue ix i551 oo |e: 6) 0] aise) asia |al 61 @ fe lala le ©) s) © 4] fyoeylay elopieh ey lee Ii-1 1 Total Project Expenditures as of March 1997 2. Chugach Statement for March 1997 3: Bank Statement of April 1997 SCHEDULE o)5 solo .si:s|ss:|oFo c|s6| 31 se lae! a siss)isslauiertelie| apie fa lel) 's fo! sl loi sr aiastalsor eis Ii-1 ITEMS FOR APPROVAL 653 osc 6 sssccn0s oss ease e es ce sisa sass Iv-1 1. Amendment to POWER Engineers contract for Update of the 1990 Economic Feasibility Study (Decision Focus) FTEMS FOR DISCUSSION | ¢. 5 ¢ s 36/5) sss 0 ls ss se oes €)s) © eee sliss las V-1 None ITEMS FOR INFORMATION | |2\q: jo: a:|$/.<1r0\c0 esto so | 0:6 lor'ss-o:/4) o:/0/ 01 9! 1 otras rocbeiyet tehiey te VI-1 1. POWER Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, May 16, 1997 2. Letter to ASCC of 4/24/97 3. Response from NERC-RAS of 5/19/97 li Report for the Month of May 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 SUMMARY The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the federal lead agencies (RUS, USFS, USFWS) and the “applicant” (Chugach Electric on behalf of the IPG) is being modified to reflect RUS as the lead agency and USFS/USFWS as co-operating agencies. Under this arrangement, RUS will prepare the EIS from an Environmental Analysis, which will be prepared by our consultants in accordance with all agencies’ requirements. The Scoping Report (draft) has not been finalized due to the delays encountered in the execution of the MOU. The contract with POWER Engineers will be amended to have Decision Focus, Inc., (DFI) review the 1990 cost/benefit study for the project and determine the extent of required updates. This amendment is included in Section IV. The updates will be authorized separately once valid cost estimates have been received and reviewed. We have requested that ASCC ask NERC’s Reliability Assessment Subcommittee (RAS) to update their assessment of 1990. NERC-RAS will complete their review by the end of August (see letter copies in Section VI). The Consultant’s schedule continues to show the effects of delays encountered in bringing the federal agencies together in the scoping, inventory and impact assessment tasks, standing at 51% completion compared to 63% planned. Review of the overall schedule still allows for filing of the draft EIS in early 1998 if no further delays occur. The third set of Community Working Group meetings has been held on April 28,1997 in Kenai and on April 30,1997 in Anchorage. Strong objections to an additional transmission line paralleling the existing line(s) were voiced at the Kenai meeting. In Anchorage the majority of Community Councils affected have passed resolutions, indicating objection to the project if built overhead. The consultants continue working with the group members to determine route refinements and mitigation measures. Report for the Month of May 1997 Southern Intertie - Phase IB W.0.#E9590081 May 27, 1997 TOTAL $3,543 ,423.00 DESCRIPTION POWER USFS/USFWS | CHUGACH ENGINEERS BUDGET $3,043,423.00 | $100,000.00 [ $400,000.00 ALLOCATED $201,295.30 $10,000.00 $40,000.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL $3,244,718.30 $110,000.00 AMENDMENTS $103,047.00 TOTAL $3 347,765.30 $110,000.00 | $440,000.00 COMMITMENT INVOICED TO $1,612,030.00 $34,954.00 $76,306.00 DATE % OF TOTAL 48.15% 17.34% $251,295.30 $3,794,718.30 $103,047.00 $3 897,765.30 $1,723,290.00 Note: “Invoiced to Date” shows charges received (not yet accured) as of May 19, 1997. Report for the Month of May 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 Il. FINANCIAL 1. Total Project Expenditures as of March 1997 2. Chugach Statement for March 1997 3. Bank Statement of April 1997 II-1 tebe 0 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. a0 Southern Intertie Transactions a Inception Through March 31, 1997 Project Expenditures Year to Date Month Through Through Ended Inception 12/31/96 2/28/97 3/31/97 Through 3/31/97 Direct Labor $68,678.93 $6,271.61 $3,806.47 $78,757.01 Indirect Labor 23,471.09 2,557.89 1,389.15 27,418.13 Power Engineers 1,918,877.36 59,442.72 165,199.91 2,143,519.99 Miscellaneous 30,326.81 290.08 5,000.00 35,616.89 Total $2,041,354.19 $68,562.30 $175,395.53 (1) $2,285,312.02 (1) This balance is lower than the 4/30/97 invoice for March charges due to the reversal of a $1,721.87 invoice accrual. Chugach does not include accruals in project invoices; only actual expenditures are reimbursed from restricted grant funds. Grant Fund Expenditures Month Month Through Ended Ended Inception 12/31/96 2/28/97 3/31/97 Through 3/31/97 Direct Charges that Chugach has been Reimbursed for $1,433,087.47 $541,402.60 $5,045.85 (2) $1,979,535.92 Plus General, Administrative & Construction Overhead 7,165.42 2,707.02 25.23 (2) 9,897.67 Total Amounts Paid to Chugach $1,440,252.89 $544,109.62 $5,071.08 (2) $1,989,433.59 (2) Chugach March 20, 1997 invoice for January, 1997 charges. |.5- 0 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska April 30, 1997 <8 = i TO: Dora Gropp - Manager, Transmission & Special Projects FROM: Kimberly Pond, Plant Accountant 4 SUBJECT: 9590081 - Southern Intertie Route Selection Study You had previously requested establishment of this work order to study route selection for the Southern Intertie for the Intertie Participants Group. The Association will be reimbursed for charges to this work order. The following charges occurred during March 1997. Direct Labor 3,806.47 Indirect Labor 1,389.15 KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Invoice # 6891 5,000.00 Power Engineers Invoice # 43459 25,800.27 Power Engineers Invoice # 43460 63,502.41 Power Engineers Invoice # 43461 41,883.12 Power Engineers Invoice # 43462 14,793.45 Power Engineers Invoice # 43463 10,789.16 Power Engineers Invoice # 43464 8,431.50 Municipality of Anchorage Invoice # 1239680 1,721.87 Sub-Total $177,117.40 General, Administrative & Construction Overhead (0.5%) 885.59 Total Charges $178,002.99 Please review the attached backup and indicate your concurrence below if you are in agreement that these charges are correct for this work order and time period. As you requested, I'll keep the original in my files. Concur: boy, A L 5 / 7 = ao Ss Date ignature KP/kp WOfiles/E9590081 Attachments Southern Intertie Grant Fund Bank Account Activity Summary April, 1997 March Ending Balance forward Total Deposits Total Withdrawals (Chugach invoice for January charges) Interest Eamed Balance April 30, 1997 $1,338,137.42 $344,342.44 ($125,002.47) $7,725.23 $1,565,202.62 OQ CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT Siem E LaCie west a eters) Account Number: 0110 606 1 Member FDIC. Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Apr 30 1997 Page: 1 of 3 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC SOUTHERN INTERTIE GRANT FUND PO BOX 196300 ANCHORAGE AK 99519-6300 FIRSTLINE: (907) 265-4700 BRANCH: MAIN BRANCH (907) 265-3525 1 cYCBI osc 6007 TER e Loe nn Eee Ee eee Account Summary -<<ocs tes sosas asec semen nw nnewnnneennnseen=<<= PREVIOUS BALANCE AS OF 03/28/97 $.00 Service Charge This Month $.00 46 Deposits & Other Credits $35,358,494.91 Interest Paid This Month $.00 23 Checks and Other Debits $35,358,494.91 CURRENT BALANCE AS OF 04/30/97 $.00 oe ne a eo ae ea ne a ee aman a Daily Account Balance Summary --------------------------n- nnn nn nnn nn Date Balance Date Balance Date 04/09 ios 04/17 -00 04/25 04/10 oO 04/18 -00 04/28 04/11 -00 04/21 -00 04/29 04/14 -00 04/22 -00 04/30 04/15 -00 04/23 04/16 oO 04/24 Dee Cee ee ee eee eee eee ee Amount Date Description 344,342.00 04/01 INCOMING WIRE TRANSFER - 1,338, 137.42- 04/01 REPO CREDIT 811.80 04/01 REPO INTEREST 1,683,291.22 04/02 REPO CREDIT 251.09 04/02 REPO INTEREST 1,683,542.31 04/03 REPO CREDIT 251.13 04/03 REPO INTEREST 1,683,793.44 04/04 REPO CREDIT 254.17 04/04 REPO INTEREST 1,684,044.61 04/07 REPO CREDIT 753.61 04/07 REPO INTEREST 1,684,798.22 04/08 REPO CREDIT 249.44 04/08 REPO INTEREST 1,685,047.66 04/09 REPO CREDIT 249.48 04/09 REPO INTEREST 1,685,297.14 04/10 REPO CREDIT 249.52 04/10 REPO INTEREST 1,560,544.19 04/11 REPO CREDIT 231.05 04/11 REPO INTEREST 1,560,775.24 04/14 REPO CREDIT 693.24 04/14 REPO INTEREST 1,561,468.48 04/15 REPO CREDIT 231.18 04/15 REPO INTEREST 1,561,700.10 04/16 REPO CREDIT 231.65 04/16 REPO INTEREST 1,561,931.75 04/17 REPO CREDIT 231.69 04/17 REPO INTEREST 1,562,163.44 04/18 REPO CREDIT 231.72 04/18 REPO INTEREST CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT Account Number: 0110 606 1 Prepared After the Close Of Business On: Apr 30 1997 Pog: 2 Of 3 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC 1 CYCBI O8C 6007 SS ETE tl eae Other Credits -<-------nenn nnn cee nnnene wooo cecennescce- Amount Date Description 1,562,395.16 04/21 REPO CREDIT 695.27 04/21 REPO INTEREST 1,563,090.43 04/22 REPO CREDIT 234.46 04/22 REPO INTEREST 1,563,324.89 04/23 REPO CREDIT 234.50 04/23 REPO INTEREST 1,563,559.39 04/24 REPO CREDIT 234.53 04/24 REPO INTEREST 1,563,793.92 04/25 REPO CREDIT 234.57 04/25 REPO INTEREST 1,564,028.49 04/28 REPO CREDIT 703.81 04/28 REPO INTEREST 1,564,732.30 04/29 REPO CREDIT 235.14 04/29 REPO INTEREST 1,564,967.44 04/30 REPO CREDIT 235.18 04/30 REPO INTEREST a Other Debits ------ nnn nnn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nn nee nnn nnn n= === Amount Date Description 1,683,291.22 04/01 REPO DEBIT 1,683,542.31 04/02 REPO DEBIT 1,683,793.44 04/03 REPO DEBIT 1,684,044.61 04/04 REPO DEBIT 1,684,798.22 04/07 REPO DEBIT 1,685 ,047.66 04/08 REPO DEBIT 1,685,297.14 04/09 REPO DEBIT 125,002. 474 04/10 DEBIT MEMO(TCE6O) 1,560,544.19 04/10 REPO DEBIT 1,560,775.24 04/11 REPO DEBIT 1,561,468.48 04/14 REPO DEBIT 1,561,700. 10 04/15 REPO DEBIT 1,561,931.75 04/16 REPO DEBIT 1,562, 163.44 04/17 REPO DEBIT 1,562,395.16 04/18 REPO DEBIT 1,563,090.43 04/21 REPO DEBIT |,563,324.89 04/22 REPO DEBIT |,563,559.39 04/23 REPO DEBIT 1,563,793.92 04/24 REPO DEBIT 1,564,028.49 04/25 REPO DEBIT 564,732.30 04/28 REPO DEBIT + 564,967.44 04/29 REPO DEBIT 1,565,202.62 04/30 REPO DEBIT Pu. your equity to work. Our HomeFlex Equity Line has two interest rate options in one program plus the interest paid may be up to 100% tax-deductible. Apply at any branch. FNBA is an equal housing lender. Report for the Month of May 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 TI. SCHEDULE T-1 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ANCHORAGE - KENAI INTERTIE 5/19/97 PHASE IB 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 1D _|Task Name %Comp. | _Act.cost__ [a2 [a3] a4 | ai] a2[a3[a4|ai[a2|a3[ a4 | ai [a2 | a3[as [ar [a2[as[ a4} ar [a2] a3] as [ai 1 | ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEE 31% | $2,593,206.45 : : : 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 19%| $76,005.00 3 ROUTE SELECTION STUD 100%| $871,650.00 4 EIS & PREL.ENGINEERIN 46% | $1,610,597.45 5 SCOPING ~99%| $372,234.72 6 INVENTORY 88%| $595,261.46 7 ~ IMPACT/MITIGATION 52%| $314,085.38 8 ALTERN.SELECTION 1%| $3,033.57 9 DRAFT EIS 1%| $4,076.64 10 FINALEIS 0% $0.00 n | STUDIES 58%| $62,069.07 12 ENG.FIELD WORK 87%| $176,300.71 13 PREL.ENGINEERING | 44%| $83,535.90 14 AGENCIES 0% | ~~: $34,954.00 15 USFS i 0%| $34,954.00 16 USFWS 0% $0.00 Task Summary ey Rolled Up Progress TS Pe NG ORAGE - KENAIINTE | Progress Molle Up Task §6=— Milestone & Rolled Up Milestone © C:\WINPROJ\SOUTHTIE\PH_IB.MPP Page 1 Report for the Month of May 1997 W.0O.#£9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 IV. ITEMS FOR APPROVAL 1 Amendment to POWER Engineers contract for Update of the 1990 Economic Feasibility Study (Decision Focus) IV-1 OWER IENGINEERS te May 16, 1997 Dora Gropp Project Manager Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Drive Anchorage, AK 99519-6300 Subject: 120376-05 Decision Focus, Inc. - Proposal for Southern Intertie Benefits Analysis. Review and Update. Dear Dora, As you requested, attached is a revised spreadsheet summarizing the proposed budget for the Decision Focus proposal. Since DFI will be contracted via a subcontract with Power Engineers, instead of Dames and Moore as previously proposed, this spreadsheet has been revised from the previous one by eliminating the 2% markup that Dames and Moore had included in their costs. As we discussed yesterday, I called Steve Haas at DFI and let him know that we had received approval to proceed with the Phase I review as proposed, and that we would be sending him copies of the requested information shortly. Steve said they are ready to get started. In terms of schedule, Steve is proposing to be able to discuss their initial review with us within three weeks of notice to proceed, as noted in their proposal. This means that they would be prepared to discuss their initial findings by June 9. HLY 23-175 a SITIES he PS NS RE SER STERIL TE SO ASE LAO OME EDEL BEE EE, POWER Engineers, Incorporated 3940 Glenbrook Drive « P.O. Box 1066 Phone: (208) 788-3456 Hailey, Idaho 83333 Fax: (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association May 16, 1997 Page 2 I suggest that the additional task funding be added to Task 5 - DEIS in our contract. Please let me know if you need any further information to conduct your review and approval process for this proposed work. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. KL Aba — Randy Pollock, P.E. Project Manager Enclosure 1p/RP ce: Tim Tetherow - D&M Mike Walbert - Power Larry Henriksen - Power File HLY 23-175 Summary of Proposed Budget - Revision 1 Decision Focus 1989 Study Review and Update | _romergonee —__| inse | ous oc Power Engineers Decision Focus Totals Estimated | NTE | Estimated | NTE__| i gories me $2,705| $1,115] $32,000] $40,000] $35,820] __$43,620} hase 2- Detaled pine &Arapus | 9a] 00] esa] 1,75] —vioom]—siao oo — soe 67] — ss. Subtotal PhaseT& 2 «| $6,847] $200] $7,047[ $2,230] $132,000] $180,000] $141,277] $189,277] So Scbcontsto Mata sal sat Scot 28s] 5208 a ae ee al [Totals 56,847] $2007 $7,047] $2,275] $134,640] $183,600] $147,562] $195,562 Notes: 1. The proposed budget for Power and Dames & Moore accounts for the time required for interaction and administration of the DFI studies. For Power, the proposed budget also accounts for the time required to integrate the technical aspects of the DFI studies into the Purpose & Need portion of the EIS. 2. Decision Focus has referenced the potential for two trips to Alaska in their proposal. The potential for such meetings is mentioned only as part of Phase 2, the detailed update and analysis. Should meetings in Anchorage be required for Phase 2, and attendance from Power and/or Dames & Moore is required, the meeting will need to be scheduled so as to coincide with already scheduled project meetings. Based on this assumption, no funding for additional trip expenses are proposed for Power or Dames and Moore. 3. NTE means Not to Exceed for Labor and Expenses DFI Proposal Summary - Revision 1 May 16, 1997 Hly 23-175a Proposal to Review and Revise the 1989 Study on the Benefits and Costs of Proposed Transmission Lines in the Alaska Railbelt Background In 1989 Decision Focus Incorporated carried out an economic analysis of several proposed transmission line upgrades or additions in the Railbelt area of Alaska. The results of the analysis were documented in a December, 1989 report entitled “Economic Feasibility of the Proposed 138 KV Transmission Lines in the Railbelt.” One of the lines studied in the 1989 analysis, the Southern Intertie Project (SIP) between Anchorage and Kenai, is currently under serious consideration; an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project is being prepared. Because the 1989 analysis helped to justify the project, it is desirable to review that analysis to determine whether any changes have occurred in the years since 1989 that would alter the conclusions of that analysis. DFI proposes to carry out a review of the 1989 study to make such a determination. The review will be carried out in two stages. The first phase will update the study accounting for changes in such factors as electricity demand growth projections and projections of fuel prices, as well as updating the benefits estimates to 1997 dollars so they can be directly compared to current estimates of the cost of the proposed line. If any changes identified during the first phase are large enough to impact the conclusions of the earlier study, then more detailed analysis will be carried out in a second phase that may require re-doing major portions of the earlier study. Approach Phase I The 1989 analysis estimated benefits of a new Anchorage-Kenai transmission line in six categories: increased reliability increased transfers of economy energy reduced transmission losses increased state gas royalty and severance tax revenues resulting from increased gas utilization ; deferral/avoidance of new generation capacity reduced cost of maintaining operating reserves ey aw For each of these categories, DFI will review the assumptions and data values underiying the benefits calculations, update them as appropriate, and make the corresponding adjustments to the level of benefits by category. As part of this updating process, DFI will review the comments that have been submitted on the Southern Intertie Project. Depending on the nature of the comments, it may be desirable to talk directly with the parties making the comments or with others knowledgeable in the areas commented on. DFI can begin work as soon as we receive formal approval. If approval is received by May 1, and the data items listed below are provided quickly, then by May 20 DFI will have completed its review of the six benefits categories and determined whether significant additional analysis, i.e., Phase II, will be required. The remainder of Phase I, including the Draft Review Statement, wiil be completed by the middle of June. In late May or early June we will hold a teleconference review of project status and future direction. If Phase II effort is required, then the scope and schedule for that effort will be determined at this time. Such determination will probably involve a trip to Alaska to meet with the various parties. If a Phase II effort is required, it will begin as soon as approval is received. We will make every effort to complete the analysis and draft documentation of Phase II by early July. Initial Data Requirements In order to meet the relatively tight deadlines of the project, it will be important to have much of the data on hand by May 1. This includes: 1. comments on the Southern Intertie Project 2. description of the SIP 3. prices, current and projected, of fuels used for generation (low, nominal, and high scenarios) 4. current and projected Railbelt electric demand (low, nominal, and high scenarios) 5. changes to existing or planned generating units since 1989: size, heat rates, etc. 6. any new studies on the value of reliability in the Railbeit area Cost and Billing DFI will bill Dames and Moore on a time and materials basis. The hourly billing rates for the individuals expected to work on the proposed effort are: Fancher $315 Haas $250 Stremei $215 Cohen $185 Support $80 We estimate that the cost of Phase I (labor, production of copies, no travel) will be about $32,000, and we guarantee that it will not exceed $40,000. Phase II is much harder to estimate, because we do not yet know what might be required. However, a reasonable estimate (labor, production of copies, two trips to Alaska) might be $100,000, with a not to exceed cost of $140,000. If travel is required, it will be billed at cost, which should not exceed $1,500 per trip. If additional efforts not described in this proposal are requested, their costs will be estimated when requested. Production costs for 40 copies each of the bound draft Review Statement and final Review Statement will be $300. Additional copies will be $4 per copy. Production costs for 40 copies each of the bound draft Revised Report and final Revised Report will be $600. Additional copies will be $8 per copy. DFI will invoice Dames and Moore monthly for work performed in the previous month. Report for the Month of May 1997 W.O.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 Vi ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION None. Report for the Month of May 1997 W.0.#E9590081 Southern Intertie - Phase IB May 27, 1997 VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION 1. POWER Engineers’ Monthly Report Phase IB - Environmental Analysis, May 16, 1997 2) Letter to ASCC of 4/24/97 3. Response from NERC-RAS of 5/19/97 VI-1 a . Tu, MLE fF May 16, 1997 g EC te ENGINEERS MAY 19 1997 Ms. Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association JRA cae 5601 Minnesota Drive, Building A iS Anchorage, AK 99518 Subject: POWER Project #120376 EIS & Preliminary Engineering Chugach Contract #95-208 Monthly Status Report No. 11 For Period April 13, 1997 - May 10,1997 Dear Dora: The following activities were performed during this invoicing period on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Preliminary Engineering portion of the Southern Intertie Project. Key Issues: e The Memorandum of Understanding. Invoice Period Overview: Continued impact assessment criteria development Conducted inter-agency meeting with Forest Service and Fish & Wildlife Service Analyzed centerline reports and inventory maps Conducted meeting with the Forest Service Conducted third set of Community Working Group meetings in Anchorage and Kenai Defined potential direct and indirect cumulative impacts Defined impact significance Establishing criteria for route selection Prepared initial draft of mitigation measures Distributed scoping report Finalized EIS work plan Continued finalization of MOU Continued contact with co-lead agencies Issued engineering system studies draft report Continued work on preliminary engineering PEI-HLY 23-171 POWER Engineers, Incorporated 0 EE ccc 3940 Glenbrook Dr. + P.O. Box 1066 Phone (208) 788-3456 Hailey. Idaho 83333 Fax (208) 788-2082 Chugach Electric Association May 16, 1997 Page 2 Work Planned for the Next Invoice Period: Continue to work with the CWGs Finalize MOU Field review for biological resources Inventory maps for all resources to be completed Initiating draft text for chapters 1-3 Continued development of impact assessment criteria Continued work on preliminary engineering Incorporate comments to the engineering system studies draft report Subcontract with Decision Focus, Inc. (DFI) to review and update their 1989 DFI Benefits Study Schedule: The schedule was updated for the previous monthly status report. The updated schedule includes tasks to account for the Alaska National Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA) application process. Monthly Status Report Issues: This monthly status report contains a Project Summary Report spreadsheet to reflect the current and projected cash flows. Task 1 - Scoping The completion of Task 1 is pending approval of the Memorandum of Understanding. Task 3 - Impact Assessment/Mitigation Planning Task 3 was delayed due to the review and approval of a final MOU. We are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. Task 4 - Alternative Selection The delay in starting Task 3 subsequently delayed the start of Task 4. We are now beginning to expend efforts that were planned for previous months. Task 7 - Studies The Draft Supplemental Studies Report was issued. PEI-HLY 23-127 #) pouee Chugach Electric Association May 16, 1997 Page 3 Task 9 - Preliminary Engineering The work originally planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June 1997. Project Overview: Total Budget $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1.612.030 Actual Remaining Project Budget $1,534,440 Dora, should you have any questions about this report or any of the backup, please do not hesitate to call me or Mike Walbert. Sincerely, POWER Engineers, Inc. Randy Pollock, P.E. i Project Manager MW/th cc: PROJECT TEAM PEI-HLY 23-127 - aus SOUTHERN INTERTIE ROUTE SELECTION STUDY - PHASE 1 120376-01 PROJECT FINANCIAL SUMMARY MAY, 1997 INVOICE Base Task T] Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Project Total Not to Exceed Budget $351,050 $660,706 $584,010 $303,475 $402,570 $247,616 $101,480 $202,655 $189,861 $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amendment No. 4 $23,789 $18,885 $22,602 $32,866 $4,904 N/A N/A N/A N/A $103,046 Total Not to Exceed Budget Actual Budget Expended Through Previous Invoice $374,839 $372,814 $679,591 $595,812 $606,612 $189,637 $336,341 $1,369 $407,474 $0 $247,616 $0 $101,480 $56,088 $202,655 $175,469 $189,861 $69,143 $3,146,469 $1,460,332 Current Invoice Amount $(593) $0 $126,891 $1,275 $4,991 $0 $5,157 $33 $13,944 $151,698 Actual Budget Expended Through Current Invoice $372,221 $595,812 $316,528 $2,644 $4,991 $0 $61,245 $175,502 $83,087 $1,612,030 Remaining Budget PEI-HLY 23-171 $2,618 $83,779 $290,084 + $333,697 $402,483 $247,616 $40,235 $27,153 $106,774 $1,534,440 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 1 - SCOPING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Scoping e pending approval of MOU. ¢ appendices have been revised. KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-171bk The completion of Task 1 is pending approval of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). No outstanding issues. Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($351,050 + $23,789 = $374,839). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 374,839 372,221 2,618 No outstanding issues. MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 2 - INVENTORY DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Inventory field review for biological resources will be conducted in the next period. Additional documentation of raptor nests and _ terrestrial wildlife. inventory maps for all resources to be completed. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($660,706 + $18,885 = $679,591). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 679,591 595,812 83,779 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 2 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 3 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Impact Assessment / continued impact assessment criteria Mitigation Planning development. conducted inter-agency meeting with Forest Service and FWS for review of biological inventory and assessment criteria, and identified biological resource surveys to be completed. analyzed centerline reports and inventory maps for visual, land use, recreation, cultural, and biological resources. conducted meeting with Forest Service for review of visual inventory and assessment criteria. prepared for CWG meeting #3. defined potential direct/indirect cumulative impacts. defined impact significance. initial draft of mitigation measures. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: Task 3 was delayed due to review and approval of a final MOU. We are now expending our efforts that were planned for previous months. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($584,010 + $22,602 = $606,612). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 606,612 316,528 290,084 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 3 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 4 - ALTERNATIVE SELECTION DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Alternative Selection e establishing criteria for route selection. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: The delay in starting Task 3 subsequently delayed the start of Task 4. We are now beginning to expend efforts that were planned for previous months. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($303,475 + $32,866 = $336,341). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 336,341 2,644 333,697 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 4 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 5 - DRAFT EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS | Draft EIS e developed outline for affected environment text of DEIS. e initiating draft text for chapters 1-3. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: Contract Amendment No. 4 is included in the budget ($402,570 + $4,904 = $407,474). $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining $407,474 4,991 $402,483 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 5 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 6 - FINAL EIS DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Final EIS e No action. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No standing issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended Remainin, 247,616 00 247,616 SCOPE: . No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 6 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 7 - STUDIES DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Studies e Draft Supplemental Studies Report was issued. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 101,480 61,245 40,235 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 7 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 8 - ENGINEERING FIELD WORK DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Engineering Field Work |e No Action. KEY ISSUES: No outstanding issues. SCHEDULE: No outstanding issues. BUDGET: No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 202,655 175,502 27,153 SCOPE: No outstanding issues. HLY 23-171bk 8 MAY 1997 INVOICE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY TASK 9 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES DURING CURRENT PERIOD AND PLANNED FOR NEXT 30 DAYS Preliminary Engineering |e Continued work on preliminary design and cost estimates for overhead lines, submarine KEY ISSUES: SCHEDULE: BUDGET: SCOPE: HLY 23-171bk cables and substations. No outstanding issues. The work planned for October, November, December and January will be performed during February - June, 1997. The completion date for this task is unchanged. No outstanding issues. $ Budgeted $ Expended $ Remaining 189,861 83,087 106,774 No outstanding issues. SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line to__| Task Name Start Finish I ‘Apr_[ May [Jun cai Tul [ Aug [Sep [Oct [Now [Dec : Jan_[ Feb [ Mar | Apr [May [Jun am Jt_[ Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan_[ Feb [Mar | Apr [ May | ft [Aug] Sep [Oct] New [ Dee. | Jan_| Feb | Mar | Apr] May | Jun {Pa T Aug [Sep [Oct] Now 2 TASK 1 SCOPING eiti96 4125187 on) QT 17 3 FILE NOTICE OF INTENT WITH FEDERAL REGISTER 10/9/86 10/0796 @ 108 | (a MOU AND WORKPLAN WITH GO LEAD AGENCIES Ti7e86 aoe? | a <5: 6 FILE ADDENDUM TO NOTICE OF INTENT ra ar3/97 ans? i 1 7] DEVELOP BASE MAPS AND ORGER PHOTOGRAPHY enii9s 3/30/98 o) I «20 e | ~ PUBLIGIAGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS - INITIAL INTERAGENCY 1116/96 TiNai96 116 tina t PREPARE MATERIALS/DEVELOP MAILING LIST “| 7AsI96 70/25/96 71s EE 1025 3 EINALIZE ALTERNATIVES AND FELD REVIEW ~~ aaaee| sore } To: i DRAFT SCOPING REPORT Tamara maT 115 I 23 7 | AGENCY COMMENTS 7 aiae7 | annia7 ons a at 7 FINALIZE SCOPING REPORT ar eT att I 42s 21) TASK 2 INVENTORY | GA 1106 sete? 6 FT A 88 iy a INVENTORY ALTERNATIVES ee ari 186 eas7 1) a AT 2 24 CONDUCT FIELD REVIEW AND AGENCY CONTACTS enva8 "gata? 1 TIT RET 26 ‘AGENCY FIELD RECONAISANCE | 6ae7 ere/a7 a DP ss a7 DATA MANAGEMENT/DOGUMENTATION aa86 oa ais wie 20 ADDITIONAL FIELD REVIEW SURVEYS AND DOCUMENTATION a2a7 27/97 a4 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESSEMENT AND MITIGATION PLANNING 7122196 ant/a7 DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIPTIONLOCATION T2286 Ba87 % DEVELOP AP APPROAGH AND CRITERIA Toei) «SBT ee 36. | AGENCY AEVIEW AND APPROVE aa | 3/5/97 5/28/07 a 37 CONDUGT INITIAL TAMA =a ] a7 ai6/97 39 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE “aap B/S? aeio7 a ~~ FINALIZE IA/MP/DOCUMENTATION 5 6/30/87 7ST 6 ‘AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE THAT anne7| Cem 45 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE COMPARISONS | stages anie7 rane an a6 | _ OEVELOP ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION CRITERIA a 1216/86 S17 oS ae = \ eu $ 6 GENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE SDT wa0/97 sn2 5/30 48 CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVE COMPARISONS: ~sri2/97 | 8127/57 eco) 6127 @ PREFFERED ALTERNATIVE SELECTION — aT as? Es APPLIGANTS PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE | Greer) ———arrer| os TASK 5 ORAFT EIS lena 12/10/98 1016/98 42no Cn ee ae Bos 37 | DEVELOP PURPOSE AND NEED Fae 116187 RTT aM Fe eee eat wer iz 50 PREPARE PDEIS 7 ARMOIRE ia vane a a0 at “AGENGY REVIEW ie onia7 ore? : oh EE 105 @ PREPARE ANILOA APPLIGATION ‘ane? vo1e/a7 oO 1008 a PREPARE OES ToT vanan7 1016 RR 174 66 ILE ANILCA APPLICATION ; | OKuaT a 107 10s WB 1013 = co ANILGA REVIEW rose? 1015/88 108 O05 es PRINT DEIS eae uaa tanger 1124 RE 1219 7 FILEDEIS WiTH EPA Spouses cea |eeiny aioe | ame ‘en 7 DISTRIBUTE a iNav nanan heen opin | Neem Taraaio 176/98 12e2 J 16 7 | PUBLIC REVIEW 175/98 ai/08 1s a 21° OER Eraraus es acavean DM syne QF Missin Task ee eas he os/ia/a7 : PROJECT SCHEDULE Cone cae SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT EIS Proposed Anchorage to Kenai Peninsula Transmission Line 1807 10__|Task Name Start Finish. Apr May | _dun a [Aug Sep [Get] Nov [Gee | Jan [Feb [Mar 1 Aer [May [un [ol [Aug T Sep [Oot [Nov [Deo [Jan [Feb [Mar [Apr [May Tun Sa [Aug [Sep [| Oct [| Nov [| Dec _| Jan | Fob | Mar | Apr] May | wun ea L Aug [Sep _[ Oct | Nov 75 FEDERAL HEARING 1/5/98 219/98 18: aay one 7 TASK 6 FINAL EIS ae 72723198 5/20/99 : 20 W H 20 78 RESPOND TO COMMENTS aes 2/29/98 320/98 225 (EE 3720 eo | PREPARE PRELIMINARY FEIS | 32888 47188 ono es 82 AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE 4/20/98 5/8/98 40 | 5/8 a4 | PREPARE FEIS a 5/11/38 6/28/08 st SB 520 BE AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVE a 6/1/88 | 6/2/98 eh a ana 88 PRINT a eres @/26/98 ons MB sv 90 FILEFEISWITHEPA visea| a9 om a1 DISTRIBUTE sh 6/5/98 71398 ens = 11 3 PUBLIC REVIEW 7iato8 | 8/2/98 7s 62 35 | RECORD OF DECISION ae 7078/88 215/89 05 i TT 27s 7 APPEAL PERIOD r 2/5/99 5/20/99 EEL: FS105 Day Apps! Patiod ao | TASK? STUDIES Se Ta 7hare7 7 a_i ip me 109 BENEFIT ANALYSIS eT TAT | wn Qo 101 ~~ RELIABILITY STUDIES i Eve THVT | an Ot 102, ELECTRIC SYSTEM STUGIES TeitSIa6 Ti97 | i C= Se a a 108 AGENCY REVIEW Far] Tera i The re joa | TASK 6 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK A e4786 THSIST ey Bus 105 HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES ae wae 10/14/96 2) TT 101: 708 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 796 | a7 1 sie ea eerie : eine es ESS RS {42 SUMMARY REPORT aa TONSIOE Wiss CT 7 Tia] TASKS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING are a . vn 134 UPOATE COST ESTIMATE asat| TANT is Wooo vas | PUBLIGIAGENGY INVOLVEMENT PROGANR aBRe] RBS —————— ~ ~ are 136 INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM * 16/97 7AI98 1 a7 1D TEAM FORMULATION: a 6/97 Ai25197 138 | MEETINGS qnaie7| 71/98 35) GONMUNITY WORKING GROUP ae anne eara ST — 140 | INTERVIEWS ae 8/5/96 | as I tonto oi WEEIRGS - wiser a HILIILILLLULTLALLILIUTILILL « Seam Weetngs 1a PUBLIC NEETINGINEARING Wie ano a BO [aa SCOPING MEETINGS a Tes) B86 ey pecten weriree i 144 PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) mi 115/98 29/98 [IIIT] Pubtic Hearings s poe eee el ee eh U LL A wt Se 148 SCOPNG “4130197 4730097 100 430 147, ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON/ANILCA APPLICATION BIST e/97 on WB en 148 a mid 798 798 = 1 Bm POWER Engineers, inc. Project: 120376-01 Revision #3 (09202-009 D&M) os/t0/s7 | sunmay QU Micstone Porcent Corp's TT PROJECT SCHEDULE POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16, 1997 1:56 PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com; ID Number _ Description =r Stat Finish ~~"? 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-01 Subtask Description: BASE MAP/PHOTOGRAPHY 1.1.01 Reproducible Map/Atlas(using quad maps) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.02 Presentation Maps(EIS/Public Meetings) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 100 1.1.03 Color Aerial Photos(1 stereo) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-A 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":500' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 1.1.03-B 3 Sets Aerial Photos 1":2000' Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 9/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-02 Subtask Description: PUBLIC/AGENCY SCOPING MEETINGS 1.2.01 File Notice of Intent with Fed Register Lead Agency 10/15/96 10/15/96 100 1.2.02 Develop MOU with Agencies Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 1/3/97 98 1.2.03 RUS Scheduled Review Times Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 = 1/31/97 90 1.2.04 Identify scope of issues to be addressed Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 12/31/96 96 1.2.05 Develop Preparation Plan Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 = 1/15/97 98 1.2.06 Review Preparation Plan Chugach Electric 1/15/97 = 1/31/97 95 1.2.07 40 Copies of Preparation Plan for ElS Tim Tetherow . 2/20/97 2/28/97 0 1.2.08 Public Notification for Scoping Meetings Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.09 Conduct/Coordinate Agency Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 1.2.10 Conduct/Coordinate Public Scoping Tim Tetherow 11/4/96 12/31/96 100 12:71 1 Meeting Anchorage(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 = 11/29/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID sini Daleniies = ra haa oe a oe pw 1.2.12 1 Meeting Cooper Landing(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.13 1 Meeting Soldotna(public/agency scoping) Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.14 Attend 1 Mtg(Anch,Cooper,Soldotna) Randy Pollock 11/1/96 11/29/96 100 1.2.15 Prepare Mat for Public/Agency Scoping Mtg Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.16 Prepare Issues/Scoping Report(documentation) Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 95 1.2.17 Provide Mailing List Tim Tetherow 715/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.18 Update Existing Public & Agency Mailing List Tim Tetherow 7/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.19 Review & Approve Mailing List Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.20 Newsletter # 1 (prior to scoping) Tim Tetherow 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2.21 Review and Approve Fact Sheet/Newsletter Chugach Electric 8/15/96 9/3/96 100 1.2:22 Establish CWG in Anchorage Tim Tetherow 9/2/96 10/31/96 100 1.2.23 25 Key Informant Interviews(Anchorage) Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.24 12-15 Interviews Kenai/determine need for CWG Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 9/30/96 100 1.2.25 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 1.2.26 ID Team Meeting #1 (Scoping) Tim Tetherow 12/2196 = 12/31/96 0 1.2.27 50 Copies Executive Summary Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 1.2.28 20 Copies Environmental Report Revision 1 Tim Tetherow 10/1/96 10/30/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-03 Subtask Description: FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES 1.3.03 Review Alternatives Tim Tetherow 8/1/96 = 10/31/96 100 1.3.04 Field Review of Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/24/96 9/27/96 100 1.3.05 Identification of Alternatives for EIS Tim Tetherow 12/2196 12/31/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-01 TASK 1 SCOPING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates % Com| ID Number Description Reap ay Start Finish . 50% Client Final 1.3.06 Agency Meeting to finalize Alternatives Tim Tetherow 12/2/96 12/31/96 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-01-55-01-04 Subtask Description: SCOPING REPORT 1.4.01 Agency Review & Approval of Scoping Rpt Tim Tetherow 9/30/96 1/31/97 25 1.4.02 40 Copies of Scoping Report Tim Tetherow 1/1/97 1/31/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 1:57PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % C ID Number _ Description rep iy Start Finish “~~” ”P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-01 Subtask Description: DATA COLLECTION 2.1.00 ID Team Mtg(Inventory Results) Tim Tetherow 12/2196 12/31/96 0 2.1.01 Agency Contacts (Continuing) Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 0 2.1.02 Inventory of Resource Data/Alternatives Tim Tetherow 6/11/96 11/6/96 95 2.1.30 CWG Mtg(Inventory/Assessement Criteria Tim Tetherow 12/2196 12/31/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 2.2.01 Compile and Reproduce Inventory Maps Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 85 2.2.02 Provide Associated Data Tables by Route Tim Tetherow 10/15/96 11/29/96 45 2.2.03 Additional Review & Documentation Tim Tetherow 5/7/97 11/20/97 55 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-03 Subtask Description: PRIVATE LANDS/PARCEL RESEARCH 2.3.01 Identify Number of Parcels for Routes Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-A 5 Routes Anchorage Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-B Tesoro Route-Kenai Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-C Tesoro Route - Soldotna (up to 3 routes) Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-D Enstar Route Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.01-E Quartz Creek Route - Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-02 TASK 2 INVENTORY Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 = repay MOM OH comp Scale Roo 2.3.01-F Quartz Creek between Portage & University Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02 1D Owner,Size, Config sub cable landfall sites Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-A 3 Sites Kenai Peninsula Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.02-B 5 Sites north side of Turnagain Arm Frank Rowland 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 2.3.03 ID Owner,Size, Config of t Alternate Substn Sites Frank Rowand 8/13/96 11/27/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-04 Subtask Description: RIGHT OF ENTRY 2.4.01 Provide Right of Entry for EIS Field Studies Frank Rowland 10/15/96 9/8/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-02-55-02-05 Subtask Description: PROPERTY SURVEY SUPPORT 2.5.01 Conduct Centerline Surveys Soldotna Area Frank Rowand 5/7/97 11/20/97 0 2.5.02 Conduct Centerline Surveys Bernice Lake Area Frank Rowand 5/7/97 11/20/97 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:00PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Ci ID Number _ Description Repindy Start Finish ~~” "P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-01 Subtask Description: DEVELOP PROJECT DESCRIP/LOCAT 3.1.00 Develop Project Description Tim Tetherow 7/22/96 11/8/96 90 3.1.01 ID Team Review of impact criteria, results, mtg Tim Tetherow 1/1197 1/31/97 85 3.1.02 Attend CWG Meeting(Impact Assessement) Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 100 3.1.03 IPG Review of Impacts Chugach Electric 2/14/97 2/28/97 0 3.1.04 Final Determination of Project Description Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/8/96 80 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-02 Subtask Description: CONDUCT ASSES/MITIGATION PLAN 3.2.01 IA/MP Site Specific Models Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 11/29/96 35 3.2.02 Impact Maps & Tables. Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 2/28/97 15 3.2.03 Develop/Conduct |A/MPP Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 35 3.2.03-A Define:Potential Direct/Indirect/Cumltv Impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 50 3.2.03-B Define:Interrelationships(cause/effect)impacts Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 45 3.2.03-C Define: Criteria Definition Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 40 3.2.03-D Define: Determination of Impact Significance Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 35 3.2.04 Preliminary Mitigation Asessement(mitigation ID) Tim Tetherow 10/21/96 12/31/96 40 3.2.05 Review Preliminary Mitigation Criteria Tim Tetherow 11/1/96 11/29/96 40 3.2.06 Review Prel Assessement & Mitigation Plan Randy Pollock 1/6/98 1/31/97 0 3.2.07 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 4/1/97 4/25/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-03 TASK 3 IMPACT ASSESS/MITIG PLN Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID ae cee pie ssa aaa weep <a ee 3.2.08 Impacts Reassessed Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 2/28/97 0 3.2.09 Residual Impacts Determined Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 3/31/97 0 3.2.10 Finalize Results IA/MP Address Cumulative Effects Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-03-55-03-03 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 3.3.01 |A/MPP Incorporated into DEIS & FEIS Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.02 Mitigation Measures incorporated into ROD Tim Tetherow 3/3/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.03 Agency Review & Approval Tim Tetherow 5/15/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.04 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 3.3.05 Review & Approve Preliminary Results Chugach Electric 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 POWER Engineers Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:01PM Deliverable Tracking System Project: 120376-04 Project Manager: Randy Pollock Deliverable Tracking System TASK 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates ID a tate caeASY Start Finish 7 OP Client Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-01 Subtask Description: ENVIRO PREFERRED ALTERNVE SELC 4.1.01 Compilation of Impact Data/by Alternative Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.02 Development of Criteria&Rte Comparison Mat Tim Tetherow 4/1/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.03 Two Day Route Comparison Meeting Tim Tetherow 4/16/97 4/18/97 0 4.1.04 ID Team Meeting(Envirn Pfrd Rte & Agency/Pro Tim Tetherow 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.05 CWG Meetings(Comparison of Alternatives) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.06 IPG Meeting Chugach Electric 6/2/97 6/30/97 0 4.1.07 Public Open House (Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-A Anchorage(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-B Cooper Landing(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.07-C Soldotna(Optional) Tim Tetherow 5/1/97 5/30/97 0 4.1.08 Review & Approve Selection Criteria Chugach Electric 4121197 4/30/97 0 4.1.09 Select Agency Preferred Route Lead Agency 5/15/97 —- 6/13/97 0 4.1.10 Comparison & Cross Discipline rankings/Alt Corr Tim Tetherow 4/1197 4/30/97 0 4.1.11 Consideration of Public & Agency Comments Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 7/18/97 0 4.1.12 Select Environmentally Preferred Alternative Tim Tetherow 6/13/97 7/18/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-04-55-04-02 Subtask Description: DOCUMENTATION 4.2.01 Newsletter # 2 (Route Selection Results) Tim Tetherow 7197 7131197 0 Deliverables by Subtask Deliverables by Subtask Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask “Project: 12037604. TASK4ALTERNATIVE SELECTION. Glient: CHUGACHELECTRICASSOCIATION. ——SOSOS~S~S Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID nae Dee = tae ae aaaaE a ae 4.2.02 Review & Approve Newsletter # 2 Chugach Electric 75/97 ~—- 7/31/97 0 4.2.03 Documentation of Route Selection Process Tim Tetherow 4/1197 8/29/97 0 POWER Engineers _ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:02 PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates % Com ID Number Description —— Start Finish P 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-01 Subtask Description: PDEIS PREPARATION 5.1.01 ID Team Mtg # 4 (PDEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 9/1/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.02 Environmental Data Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.03 14 - 8 1/2 X 11 Color Map Photos Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.04 2- 18 X 30 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.05 23 - 11 X 17 Color Maps Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.06 Develop Purpose and Need Statement Tim Tetherow 2/3/97 9/15/97 0 5.1.07 Prepare Preliminary DEIS Tim Tetherow 6/23/97 9/17/97 5 5.1.08 40 Copies (150 pages each) PDEIS Tim Tetherow 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.09 Distribution of Copies Chugach Electric 9/15/97 9/30/97 0 5.1.10 Review PDEIS Chugach Electric 9/1/97 9/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-02 Subtask Description: DEIS PREPARATION 5.2.01 ID Team Mtg # 5 (DEIS Review/Approval) Tim Tetherow 11/3/97 11/28/97 0 5.2.02 Compile & Incorporate Changes to PDEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 5.2.03 Finalize DEIS Tim Tetherow 10/31/97 11/21/97 0 5.2.04 Review DEIS Lead Agency 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 5.2.05 Review & Approve DEIS Chugach Electric 11/25/97 12/19/97 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-05 TASK 5 DRAFT EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com, ID Number _ Description a Start Finish ~~ -”? 50% Client _—_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DISTRIBUTE 5.3.01 Provide Lead Agency Signature Lead Agency 114/98 3/16/98 0 5.3.02 File with EPA Tim Tetherow 114/98 = 3/20/98 0 5.3.03 Print & Distribute DEIS Tim Tetherow 12/22/97 1/9/98 0 5.3.04 200 Copies(150 pgs/each) to Lead Fed Agency Tim Tetherow 1/26/98 1/30/98 0 5.3.05 Publish Notices of Availability Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.3.06 Distribute Copies to Interested Parties & Agencies Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-05-55-05-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.4.01 ID Team Meeting # 6 (Pre-Hearing) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.02 Newsletter # 3 (Announce Public Hearings) Tim Tetherow 1/1/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.03 Review & Approve Newsletter # 3 Chugach Electric 1/15/98 1/30/98 0 5.4.04 Schedule & Conduct Public Hearing # 1 Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-A Anchorage Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-B Cooper Landing Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.04-C Soldotna Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 5.4.05 Public/Agency Review of DEIS Lead Agency 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.06 Recieve/Compile Public Comments on DEIS Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.07 Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 2/2/98 3/20/98 0 5.4.08 Attend Federal Hearings Tim Tetherow 2/16/98 3/11/98 0 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:03 PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com ID Number _ Description ——— Start Finish “~~””P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-01 Subtask Description: PFEIS PREPARATION 6.1.01 Newsletter(Announce FEIS) Tim Tetherow 7198 7/31/98 0 6.1.02 ID Team Mtg(Rvw Comments) Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 3/31/98 0 6.1.03 Respond to comments Tim Tetherow 3/20/98 4/17/98 0 6.1.04 Prepare PFEIS Tim Tetherow 4/20/98 5/20/98 0 6.1.05 ID Team Mtg(Review PFEIS) Tim Tetherow 5/1/98 5/29/98 0 6.1.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency §/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.07 Review PFEIS Chugach Electric 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.1.08 40 Copies of PFEIS Tim Tetherow 5/11/98 = 5/20/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-02 Subtask Description: FEIS PREPARATION 6.2.01 Compile & Respond to Comments Tim Tetherow 5/21/98 6/10/98 0 6.2.02 Prepare FEIS Tim Tetherow 6/11/98 7/3/98 0 6.2.03 Review & Approve FEIS Chugach Electric 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 6.2.04 Provide Lead Agency Signature Tim Tetherow 8/10/98 8/20/98 0 6.2.05 Prepare FEIS for Printing Tim Tetherow 7/28/98 8/18/98 0 6.2.06 Agency Review & Approval Lead Agency 7/6/98 7/27/98 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-06 TASK 6 FINAL EIS Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com IDNumber _ Description Renpiedy Start Finish ~~”? 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-03 Subtask Description: PRINT AND DOCUMENTATION 6.3.01 Print & Distribute FEIS Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 6.3.02 200 Copies for Distribution Tim Tetherow 9/4/98 9/9/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-04 Subtask Description: PUBLIC REVIEW 6.4.01 FEIS Available to Public Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 6.4.02 Public Review Tim Tetherow 9/9/98 10/23/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-06-55-06-05 Subtask Description: RECORD OF DECISION 6.5.01 File FEIS with EPA Lead Agency 8/20/98 9/2/98 0 6.5.02 Record of Decision Lead Agency 7/6/98 8/28/98 0 POWER Engineers Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:06PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com ID Number _ Description rene Start Finish ~~"? 50% Client —_Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-05 Subtask Description: INDUCTIVE COORDINATION STUDIES 7.5.01 Summary Report William Riall 7N5/96 = 8/14/97 50 7.5.02 Recommend Dsg Parameters William Riall 75/96 8/14/97 70 7.5.03 Telephone Contacts William Riall 7N5/96 ~—- 8/14/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-06 Subtask Description: EMF CALCULATIONS 7.6.01 EMF Models Larry Henriksen 75/96 8/14/97 20 7.6.02 EIS & Prelim Eng Calculations Larry Henriksen 75/96 =: 8/14/97 0 7.6.03 Text & Graphs or Charts-ElS Larry Henriksen 75/96 = 8/14/97 20 7.6.04 RFI/TVI & Audible Noise Analysis Larry Henriksen 7/15/96 8/14/97 0 7.6.05 Attendance at Public Hearings (Mike Silva) Larry Henriksen 2/2/98 2/27/98 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-22-07-07 Subtask Description: CATHODIC PROTECTION 7.7.01 Summary Report William Riall 75/96 8/14/97 90 7.7.02 Recommend Design Parameters William Riall 7N5/96 = 8/14/97 90 7.7.03 Office Visit to Pipeline-Anchorage William Riall 7/15/96 8/14/97 100 7.7.04 Telephone Contact of Pipeline William Riall 7N5/96 =—-8/14/97 60 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-07 TASK 7 SYSTEM STUDIES Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates % Com| ID Number Description —— Start Finish ° ° 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-01 Subtask Description: ALTERNATE LOAD STUDIES 7.1.01 Determine System Requirements Ronald Beazer 7AI96 =: 12/31/96 100 7.1.02 Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 796 = 12/13/96 100 7.1.03 Meeting with IPG Members Ronald Beazer 8/5/96 8/6/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-02 Subtask Description: SYSTEM OUTAGE(N-1) 7.2.01 Emergency Transfer Limits Ronald Beazer 71196 12/13/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-03 Subtask Description: DYNAMIC STABILITY 7.3.01 Dynamic Stability Analysis Ronald Beazer 7196 12/13/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-07-23-07-04 Subtask Description: SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES REPORT 7.4.01 10 Copies Draft Report Section Ronald Beazer 11/25/96 12/6/96 100 7.4.02 IPG Teleconference Ronald Beazer 12/2/96 12/9/96 0 7.4.03 Final Report Section Ronald Beazer 12/9/96 12/13/96 75 POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:07PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % C ID Number Description Rene kelly Start Finish — 50% Client Final Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-01 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES 8.1.01 Hydrographic Rpt Bottom Profiles William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.1.02 One Mobilization-Hydrographic Subcontractor William Riall 6/14/96 8/15/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-02 Subtask Description: HYDROGRAPHIC SUPERVISION 8.2.01 Report Findings of Investigations William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.02 Work Log of Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.03 Field Eng Present During Hydro Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.04 Analyze Data-Hydrographic Survey William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 100 8.2.05 Feasibility Submarine Cable Crossings William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.2.06 Assessment of Cable Embedment Opt. William Riall 6/14/96 10/14/96 90 8.2.07 Recommend Prelim Cable Const William Riall 10/1/96 10/14/96 35 8.2.08 Prelim Recommend-Armoring & Install William Riall 10/1/96 10/14/96 35 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-03 Subtask Description: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 8.3.01 Geotechnical Information Summary Larry Henriksen 11/1/96 1/2197 0 8.3.02 Review Existing Geotech Data Larry Henriksen TII96 1/2197 5 8.3.03 Review Construction & Operations Experience Larry Henriksen 7196 1/2197 0 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ates Scheduled Review Dates ID er eagiieeeenan eo a oan om = =e Final 8.3.04 Arrange For & Use Geotech Larry Henriksen 7TNI96 1/2/97 0 8.3.05 Visit to Enstar's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 71196 1/2/97 0 8.3.06 Visit to Tesoro's Offices Lower 48 William Riall 71196 1/2197 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-04 Subtask Description: FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 8.4.01 Summarize Field Notes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.02 Field Observations-Environ Personnel Tim Tetherow 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.03 Field Observations-Eng Personnel Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.04 Identify Propective Centerline Locations Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 60 8.4.05 Identify Potential Mitigation Methods Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 —- 8/15/97 75 8.4.06 Identify Most Appropriate Structure Types Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 75 8.4.07 Select Submarine Cable Landfall Locations William Riall 6/14/96 = 8/15/97 80 8.4.08 Identify Tech or Environmental Challenges Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.09 Note Other Observed Features Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.10 Fixed Wing Aircraft Overflight-ID'd Routes Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.11 3 Days Helicopter Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/1/96 100 8.4.12 9 Days on Ground Reconnaissance Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 8.4.13 Detailed Field Review/Alternatives in Table 1 Larry Henriksen 6/14/96 8/15/97 70 Task/Subtask: 120376-08-22-08-05 Subtask Description: SUMMARY OF FIELD REPORT 8.5.01 Copies of Summary Field Report Michael Walbert 10/15/96 2/13/98 15 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-08 TASK 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Indi % Com ID Number __ Description —— Start Finish ~~”? 50% Client _Final 8.5.02 Prelim Submarine Cable Recommendations William Rial 6/14/96 2/13/98 30 8.5.03 Observations & Conclusions Impacting Project William Riall 614/96 2/13/98 30 Deliverables by Subtask POWER Engineers __ Deliverable Tracking System Report Printed: Fri, May 16,1997 2:11PM Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION / Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates %C hopin Start Finish ~~"? 50% Client Final Deliverable ID Number Description Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-07 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DESIGN-SUBSTATIONS Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 75 9.07.01 One-Line and General Arrangement Drawings 9.07.02 Modify Existing General Arrangement Plans Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 75 9.07.03 Identify & Note Bus Connct & Phasing on DWGS Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 75 9.07.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maintenance Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 75 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-08 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRTRIA-REACT Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/97 30 9.08.01 Supplemental Design Criteria Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-09 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-REACITVE COMP Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 12/2/96 65 Modify One Lines and General Arrangements 8/1/96 12/2/96 65 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Stanley Sostrom 9.09.01 9.09.02 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-10 Subtask Description: COST EST-SUBMARINE CABLES William Riall 115/97 = 5/14/97 0 9.10.01 Cost Estimates Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates , Scheduled Review Dates % Com ID Number _ Description a Start Finish “~~”"P 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-13 Subtask Description: COST EST-REACTIVE COMPENSATION 9.13.01 Cost Estimate Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 20 9.13.02 Compile/Review Vendor Support Data Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 20 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-21-09-14 Subtask Description: COST EST-R O W ACQUISITION 9.14.01 3 Identified Alternative Routes Cost Estimates Frank Rowand 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.02 Develop Land Costs Frank Rowland 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 9.14.03 Develop Labor/Exp Costs to Acquire Easements Frank Rowand 1/15/97 5/14/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-01 Subtask Description: MANUFAC/UTIL SITE VISIT-SUBMAR 9.01.01 Manufacturer & Factory Inspections William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.02 Utility Specific Operating Data William Rial 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 9.01.03 1 - 7 Day Trip for 2 people to Denmark William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-02 Subtask Description: PRELIM DESIGN & SPEC-SUB CABLE 9.02.01 Preliminary Design Parameters William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 15 9.02.02 Preliminary Performance Specs William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 15 9.02.03 Determine Const/Operation/Main Requirements William Riall 10/16/96 4/15/97 15 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 Deliverable Milestone Dates Scheduled Review Dates Indi % Com; ID Number _ Description ne Stat Finish ~~"? 50% Client _Final Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-03 Subtask Description: SUMMARY CABLE REPORT 9.03.01 10 Copies of Summary Report William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.02 Recommend Specific Cable Type William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 9.03.03 Recommend Most Probable Method of Installation William Riall 2/3/97 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-04 Subtask Description: SUBMARINE/LAND CBL TRAN SITES 9.04.01 Preliminary Site Specific Arrangements William Riall 1/1/97 4/15/97 0 9.04.02 Engineering Sketches of Transition Station William Riall 1/1/97 4115/97 0 9.04.03 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/10 Sub CBL Landfalls William Riall 1/1197 4115/97 0 9.04.04 DSGN Parameters/EIS Support/2 Transiton Sites William Riall 1197 4/15/97 0 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-05 Subtask Description: PRELIMINARY DSGN-O H LINE 9.05.01 Preliminary Design for Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 90 9.05.02 Prel DSGN for DBL Circuit Single Pole Structures Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 90 9.05.03 Est/Dist Underbuilt to Single Pole Struct Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 90 9.05.04 Determine Const/Operation/Maint Requirements Larry Henriksen 9/16/96 9/16/97 90 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-06 Subtask Description: SUPPLIMENTAL DSGN CRIT-SUBSTAT 9.06.01 Site Visits Stanley Sostrom 8/1/96 8/30/96 100 9.06.02 Data Acquisition/Drawing Collection Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 10/15/96 100 Deliverable Tracking System Deliverables by Subtask Project: 120376-09 TASK 9 PRELIM ENGINEERING Client: CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Project Manager: Randy Pollock MIS Project Start Date: 6/10/96 MIS Project End Date: 6/10/97 ID Number Description Respindy "Start Fintan CO? S00 Ghent Final 9.06.03 Schedule and Attend Meetings Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 9.06.04 Provide Supplemental Design Criteria Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 80 9.06.05 One Mobilization/Office Visit Stanley Sostrom 9/2/96 12/2/96 100 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-11 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-O H LINE 9.11.01 Cost Estimates guyed "X" Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.02 Cost Estimates Single Stl Pole Single Circuit Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.03 Cost Estimates Wood Pole H-Frame Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.04 Cost Estimates DBL Circuit Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.05 Cost Est Addition of Underbuilt to Single Pole Larry Henriksen 1115/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.06 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Larry Henriksen 1/15/97 5/14/97 25 9.11.07 Summary Cost Report Larry Henriksen 4/15/97 5/14/97 25 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-22-09-12 Subtask Description: COST ESTIMATE-SUBSTATIONS 9.12.01 Cost Estimate for 2 New Endpoints Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 10 9.12.02 Narrative of Cost Estimate Process Stanley Sostrom 1/15/97 5/14/97 10 9.12.03 Summary Cost Report Stanley Sostrom 4115/97 5/14/97 10 Task/Subtask: 120376-09-23-09-15 Subtask Description: SUMMARY COST REPORT 9.15.01 15 Copies Summary Reports Michael Walbert 4115/97 5/14/97 0 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 5-10-97 3RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| _ JUN/JUL AUG SEP oct NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR ¥ JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 SCOPING Actual % Work Completed 5%| ss 20%| = (28% = 88% = BM] 72%] 77M 93% 99% 99% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 2%| 25%) 26% 33%| 52% 74% -87%| 98% 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% | Rev. 1 Planned % Complete § (to date) N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A\ 77%| 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 30% 30% 33%| 51% 63% 77%|_ 93%| 99% 99% Base Planned $ (this period) $6,743 | $81,045 $2,745 | $25,645 $67,045 $75,045 | $46,045 $23,645 $23,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A| NAL N/A| N/A N/A N/A $67,538 | $60,112 $27,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $15,925 $89,330 ($558) $9,848 $63,340 $42,082 $67,538 | __ $59,509 $25,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $6,743 $87,788 $90,533 | $116,178 | $183,223] $258,268] $304,313 $327,958 | $351,050] $351,050 $351,050] $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A! N/A| $287,505 | $347,617 | _ $374,839 | $374,839 $374,830 | $374,880 | $374,839 $374,839 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $15,925 | $105,255| $104.697| $114,545| $177,885| $219,967| _$287,505| $347,014 $372,814| $372,814 ees | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050| $351,050/ $351,050| $351,050/ $351,050 —$351,050| $351,050| —$351,050| $351,050| $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050, $351,050 | $351,050 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A NIA N/A N/AI N/A N/A] $23,789 | ‘$23,789 «$23,789 | —_—*$23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | __‘ $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget _ $351,050 | _$351,050| $351,050] $351,050, —$351,050| —$351,050| $374,839/ $374,839| $374,839| $374,839 $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839 | $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget $335,125 | $245,795 | $246,353 | $236,505 | $173,165 | $131,083 $87,334 | $27,825 $2,025 $2,025 2 INVENTORY ; Actual % Work Completed = 0% 6% 25% 45%| «60% 67%| 73% 80% 87% 88% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) | 0%) 5% 23% 53% 73% 83% 84% 84% 84% 84% 87% 95% 100%| 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date); N/A N/A; ON/A N/A N/A N/A 73% 82% 85% 86% 89% 92% 96% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 5% 24% 43% 58% 72% 73% 78% 87% 88% ie Base Planned $ (this period) $941 $29,441 $121,000} _$200,500| _ $129,500 $69,768 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,500. $52,000 $34,056 $1,000 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/AL N/A N/A N/A N/A —sON/A|__—‘'$19,728| —: $58,932 $20,240 $8,817 $17,500 $19,000 $29,613 | $26,975 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $32,162 | $124,454| $129,043 $100,796 $89,331 $19,728 $33,908 | $63,502 $2,888 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $941 $30,382 | $151,382] $351,882| $481,982] $551,150] $556,150 | —$556,150| $556,150| $556,150 $573,650| $625,650| $659,706 | $660,706 _ Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) NVA N/A N/A N/A| N/A NiA| $495,514 | $554,446 | —_-$574,¢ $583,503 $604,003 | $623,003 | $652,616 | $679,591. | __ Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $32,162 | $156,616| $285,659 $386,455 | —$475,786| $495,514| $529,422 | $592, $595,812 | “Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706| $660,706| $660,706| $660,706| —_ $660,706 $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A! NA N/A N/A N/A N/A] $18,885 $18,885 $18,885, $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 ‘$18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $660,706 | $660,706 | $660,706] $660,706 | $660,706| $660,706 | —_ $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591. Actual Remaining Task Budget $660,706 | $504,090 $375,047 $274,251 | $184,920 $184,077 $150,169 $86,667 $83,779 3 [IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PLANNING Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0%| 0% 1% 5% 7% 10% 16% 31% ee Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 25% 40%| 50% | 60% 80% 100% 100%| 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) NiA| NiA| N/A NiA| N/A N/A 7% 20%) 37% 55% 82% 89% 96% 99% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% | 0% 0% 1% 5% 7% 9% 16% 31% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $29,000 $30,000 $85,000 $90,000 $57,000 $58,000 $117,000 $28,010 $0 | $0 $0 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) —_| N/A ONY N/A N/A N/A N/A\ $10,408 $81,590 $99,490 | $111,370 $78,700 $42,295 | $37,600 ‘$18,000 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $383 $64 $0 $5,788 $23,901 $10,408 $14,998 $41,883 $92,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 go] $0 $29,000| $59,000) $144,000| $284,000 —-$291,000/ $349,000] $466,000 $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010 | Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) NAL N/A NAL N/A N/A} N/A] $40,544 | $122,134) $221,624 | $332,994 $499,724 | $542,019 | $579,619 | _ $597,619 | Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $383 $447 $447 $6,235 $30,136 $40,544 | $55,542 $97,425 $189,637 — Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010| $584,010 $584,010] $584,010 $584,010| $584,010| $584,010) —$584,010| $584,010 | $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010] $584,010] $584,010 | __CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget NAL N/A N/A N/A| N/A __NA|_ $22,602 $22,602 $22,602] $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 | $22,602 $22,602 | Total Task NTE Budget $584,010 $584,010, $584,010| $584,010 $584,010 | $584,010] $606,612 | —$606,612| $606,612 | $606,612 $606,612 | $606,612| $606,612| $606,612 | Actual Remaining Task Budget $584,010 | $583,627, $583,563[ $583,563] $577,775| $553,874] $566,068 | $551,070] $509,187 | $416,975 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 1 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 5-10-97 38RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH] _JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR | JUN JUL AUG SEP 4 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Actual % Work Completed 0% 0%} OH OH HH OH OH OH 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 056 | 0% 35% “61%! === B0%| ~—=—=—«100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 5% 15% 31% 71% 91% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,400 $77,400 $58,400 $60,875 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $15,000 $35,000 $52,000 $72,000 $69,000 $29,972 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $1,369 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,800 $184,200 $242,600 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,369 $16,369 $51,369 $103,369 — $237,369 $306,369 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 $1,369 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 Total Task NTE Budget $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actua! Remaining Task Budget $303,475 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $302,106 $334,972 $334,972 $334,972 $334,972 5 DRAFT EIS Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 4% 11% 19% 34% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 13% 32% 43% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 $1,572 $1,582 $31,570 $31,570 $57,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $0 $0 $0 $43,300 $78,052 $42,017 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,772 $7,344 $14,698 $46,268 $77,838 $135,408 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $6,100 $6,100 $6,100 $10,100 $53,400 $131,452 $173,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ee Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) ae $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 ____ $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 6 FINAL EIS Actual % Work Completed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A’ N/A N/A N/A 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% all Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0__ LL Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A\ N/A N/A N/AI N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 2 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 5-10-97 38RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 38RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| JUN/JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 7 STUDIES Actual % Work Completed kag, ie 5%| TH Th 38%! «& 1% BP. ER 48% 55% 60% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 9% 21% 51% 73% 73%| ss 78%| =i C*C«‘éi BM a 88% 87%! 8% 1% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 38% 55% 56% é 67% 78% 89% 90% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 0% 3% 7% 7% 8% 14% 27% 33% 47% 55% 2. Base Planned $ (this period) $927 $3,927 $4,427 $12,200 $30,325 $22,780 $0 $0 $2,300 $2,300 80. $2,300 $4,139 $4,175 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $13,352 $10,492 $18,035 $500 $11,156 $11,300 $11,207 $802 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $2,569 $4,177 $637 $1,148 $5,705 $13,352 $5,455 $14,793 $8,252 A $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $927 $4,854 $9,281 $21,481 $51,806 $74,586 $74,586 $74,586 $76,886 $79,186 | $83,766 $87,905 $92,080 $92,080 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $27,588 $38,080 $56,115 $56,615 $68,271 $79,571 $90,778 $91,580 Actual $ Expended (to date) $0 $2,569 $6,746 $7,383 $8,531 $14,236 $27,588 $33,043 $47,836 $56,088 20 i Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Ag 0 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual Remaining Task Budget $101,480 $98,911 $94,734 $94,097 $92,949 $87,244 $73,892 $68,437 $53,644 $45,392 8 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Actual % Work Completed 5% 15% 50% 60% 70% 74% 77% 79% 84% 87% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 5% 18% 52% 63% 68% 78% 86% 91% 91% 91% 94% 97% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A’ N/A N/A N/A 77% 79% 81% 81% 88% 95% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 5% 13% 48% 60% 70% 74% 77% 79% 84% 87% Base Planned $ (this period) $9,600 $27,600 $68,900 $20,980 $10,800 $20,680 $16,600 $9,955 $0 $0 $5,500 $5,500 $6,540 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $7,645 $4,000 $2,601 $0 $15,000 $14,000 $10,026 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $10,330 $17,007 $69,770 $23,487 $20,840 $7,949 $7,645 $2,827 $10,789 $4,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $9,600 $37,200 $106,100 $127,080 $137,880 $158,560 $175,160 $185,115 $185,115 $185,115 $190,615 $196,115 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $157,028 $161,028 $163,629 $163,629 $178,629 $192,629 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) $10,330 $27,337 $97,107 $120,594 $141,434 $149,383 $157,028 $159,855 $170,644 $175,469 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget $192,325 $175,318 $105,548 $82,061 $61,221 $53,272 $45,627 $42,800 $32,011 $27,186 9 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Actual % Work Completed 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% 25% 36% oe 5% Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 2% 4% 9% 23% 31% 44% 57% 71% 88% oi 98% 98% 98% 98% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 36% 53% T1%@ 8 98% 98% 98% 98% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 1% 1% 1% 12% 17% 18% 20% 24% 36% Base Planned $ (this period) $2,580 $2,137 $2,137 $10,337 $27,417 $14,557 $23,697 $25,557 $26,837 $32,397 $2,132 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1,937 $33,000 $33,000 $35,000 $25,330 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $1,694 $0 $1,080 $0 $20,307 $9,513 $1,937 $2,746 $8,432 $23,434 = $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $2,580 $4,717 $6,854 $17,191 $44,608 $59,165 $82,862 $108,419 $135,256 $167,653 a3 83 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $34,531 $67,531 $100,531 $135,531 60,5 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) $1,694 $1,694 $2,774 $2,774 $23,081 $32,594 $34,531 $37,277 $45,709 $69,143 83,0 Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 89 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $ $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget $188,167 $188,167 $187,087 $187,087 $166,780 $157,267 $155,330 $152,584 $144,152 $120,718 { Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 3 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 5-10-97 38RD QUARTER 1996 4TH QUARTER 1996 1ST QUARTER 1997 2ND QUARTER 1997 3RD QUARTER 1997 TASK MONTH| _JUN/JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 Actual % Work Completed | 1% 5% 12% 18%) 24%) 30% 338% 38% 40%] _ 46% | Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 1% 5% 12%| = 22% 31%| 41% 47% 51% 55% 60%. 69% 74% 79%. 83% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A N/A ___ NA a N/A 33% 42% 49% _ 56% 69% 75% 81% 84% Actual % Expended $ (to date) 1% 6% 12% 18% 24%| 30% 33% 37% 42% 46% i Base Planned $ (this period) $20,791 | $144,150 $199,209 $298,662 $295,087 | $287,830 $181,342 $116,157 $116,001 $153,269 $130,424 $170,609 $134,741 | $119,445 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) —_| Oy N/A| N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $120,608 $269,226 $235,588 $207,687 $219,686 $198,895 $196,470 $87,794 Actual $ Expended (this period) $27,949 $142,820 $198,987 $163,015 $212,219 $178,481 $120,608 $119,443 $165,199 $131,611 $0 $0 $0 | $0 Base Planned$(todate) | $20,791 $164,941 $364,150 $662,812 $957,899 | $1,245,729 | $1,427,071 | $1,543,228 | $1,659,229 | $1,812,498 © $2,090,450 | $2,261,059 | $2,395,800 | $2,515,245 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) N/A N/A N/A\ N/A, NAT CNA} $1,044,079 | $1,313,305 | $1,548,893 | $1,756,580 $2,158,796 | $2,357,691 | $2,554,161 | $2,641,955 Actual $ Expended (to date) $27,949 $170,769 | $369,756 $532,771 $744,990 $923,471 | $1,044,079 | $1,163,522 | $1,328,721 | $1,460,332 | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 |__ $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A! N/A N/A $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget $3,015,474 | $2,872,654 | $2,673,667 | $2,510,652 | $2,298,433 | $2,119,952 $2,102,391 | $1,982,948 | $1,817,749 | $1,686,138 BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $364,150 $881,579 $413,500 $431,221 $424,795 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,245,729 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $625,422 $609,903 $483,159 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $369,756 $553,715 $405,250 $283,309 $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $923,471 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 4 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT 5-10-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1 SCOPING Actual % Work Completed ees eee a ee |e Se | ene pe ee ee eee os je oe ek ee ieee |onee ces Pp Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $357,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 $351,050 | CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 | $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 $23,789 Total Task NTE Budget $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 $374,839 Actual Remaining Task Budget 2 INVENTORY Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 __ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 | $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 $660,706 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 $18,885 Total Task NTE Budget $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 $679,591 Actual Remaining Task Budget 3 __|IMPACT ASSESSMENT/MITIGATION PL Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $8,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 $584,010 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 $22,602 Total Task NTE Budget $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 $606,612 Actual Remaining Task Budget Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 5 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 5-10-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 3RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ALTERNATIVE SELECTION Actual % Work Completed o 4 _ tee ee ae ee tee oe 2 ne ol ee a = Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% _ 100% 100%] 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100%, 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% __ 100% 100% __ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) __Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 | ___$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | ___$0 $0 $0 $0 "Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0_ _ $0 | $0 $0 $0 | __ $0] $0 $0 __ $0 $0 _$0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 Base Planned § (to date) $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 Rev. 1 Planned § (to date) |: $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 _ $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 | $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 $303,475 _ CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 | __—‘ $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 | $32,866 | $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 $32,866 — Total Task NTE Budget $336,341 $336,341. $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 | $336,341 $336,341 $336,341 DRAFT EIS Actual Remaining Task Budget i a Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 50% 55%| 80% 66% 85% 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 59% 66%) _ 85%, 92% Es 00% 100%)! 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%| 100% Actual % Expended § (to date) Base Planned § (this period) $64,570 | $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $42,570 $18,742 | == $0 |: $0 $0 $0 $0 [$0 $0 __ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $66,200 $29,000] $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $30,001 $1,904. $0 $0 $0) $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned §$ (to date) | $199,978 | $221,548 $241,118 $266,688 $341,258 | $383,828 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $239,669 $268,669 | $297,669 $347,569 | $375,569 $405,570 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 Actual $ Expended (to date) | ____ Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 | $402,570 $402,570 $402,570 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $4,904 _ $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 1 5 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 | $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 $4,904 Total Task NTE Budget _ $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 | $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 $407,474 Actual Remaining Task Budget | ‘ mie FINAL EIS Actual % Work Completed a aly & Ese ‘ : Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% 0% | 2 Oe 0% 16% 26%; 50%) 60%! 74% 84%] 94% 100%) 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 0% _ 0% = 0% 0% 40% 53% _ 86% 90% 93% 96% 98%] 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | ___ Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 | — 2 $0 $0 ee $39,100 | $25,100 $59,600 | $25,100 $35,100 $24,600| $24,600 $14,416 | $0 | __ Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 | $0 | $0 $0 $42,900| $55,563 | —_ $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $8,700 $6,660 $6,163 | _—_—*$3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 ____ Base Planned $ (to date) $0, $0 $0 $0 $39,100 $64,200 $123,800 $148,900 $184,000 $208,600 $233,200 $247,616 | $247,616 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900 $98,463 | $132,163 | $180,229] $214,033 | $222,233 | $230,933 | $237,593 $243,756 | $247,616 Actual $ Expended (to date) =| Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 | _CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A’ N/A] N/A NWA ee NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AI N/A Total Task NTE Budget _ $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 | $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 $247,616 Actual Remaining Task Budget Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 6 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 5-10-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 38RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 8 TASK MONTH OcT NOV DEC JAN EEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OcT NOV DEC 7 STUDIES Actual % Work Completed ee eg | ea : ey ee, oe Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 96%| «96% 96%! —si6%|—C(i(‘éi|:OC*C*‘“‘éiaL~CO~*~*C*«00% 100%| 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $92,080 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $91,580 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $97,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 Actual $ Expended (to date) | Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A : N/A NA N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 $101,480 ENGINEERING FIELD WORK Actual Remaining Task Budget es see ree ee ee eee eee 9 Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 106% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual $ Expended (to date) Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 $202,655 Actual Remaining Task Budget PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Actual % Work Completed Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) Base Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,851 $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $185,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual $ Expended (to date) z Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,851 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Task NTE Budget $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $139,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 $189,861 Actual Remaining Task Budget E fee Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 7 Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are 5/16/97 SOUTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT THROUGH PERIOD ENDING: 5-10-97 4TH QUARTER 1997 1ST QUARTER 1998 2ND QUARTER 1998 38RD QUARTER 1998 4TH QUARTER 1998 TASK MONTH OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL PROJECT 120376-01 ___ Actual % Work Completed |_| sate el re saa wes Eda ree Meee 2 ae ae i : Base Planned % Complete $ (to date) 85% 85% | 86% 87% 89% 91% 93% 94% 96% 96% | 98% 99% 100% 100% 100% Rev. 1 Planned % Complete $ (to date) |_ 86% 87%| 88% 90% 91% 93% 95% 96% 98%| 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% Actual % Expended $ (to date) | | Base Planned $ (this period) |. $64,570 $21,570 $19,570 $25,570 $74,570 $47,970 $57,842 $25,100 $59,600 | $25,100 $35,100 $28,600 $28,600 $14,416) $0 Rev. 1 Planned $ (this period) i $75,193 | $29,000 $29,000 $49,900 $28,000 $78,801 $57,467 $33,700 $48,065 $33,804 $8,200 $12,700 | $10,660 | — $6,163 $3,860 Actual $ Expended (this period) $0 | $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 Base Planned $ (to date) | $2,579,81 5 $2,601,385 $2,620,955 $2,646,525 $2,721,095 $2,769,065 $2,826,907 $2,852,007 $2,911,607 $2,936,707 $2,971 807 $3,000,407 | $3,029,007 $3,043,423 $3,043,423 | _ Rev. 1 Planned $ (to date) $2,717,148 | $2,746,148 | $2,775,148 | $2,825,048 | $2,853,048 | $2,931,849 | $2,989,317 | $3,023,017 | $3,071,082 | $3,104,886 | $3,113,086 | $3,125,786 | $3,136,446 | $3,142,609 | $3,146,469 Actual $ Expended (to date) | i Base NTE Budget (Amend. #3) $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 | $3,043,423 ___CWG Contract Amend. #4 Budget $103,047 | __ $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 | $103,047 $103,047 $103,047 | $103,047 Total Project NTE Budget $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,471 $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470] $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 | $3,146,470 Actual Remaining Project Budget | al | BASE PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $105,710 $148,110 $142,542 $88,800 $43,016 BASE PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,375,226 $422,468 REV. 1 PLANNED QUARTER TOTALS $133,193 $156,701 $139,233 $54,704 $20,683 REV. 1 PLANNED YEARLY TOTALS $1,851,677 $371,321 ACTUAL QUARTER TOTALS $0 $0 | $0 $0 $0 ACTUAL YEARLY TOTALS $688,559 $0 Rev. 1 Updated as of 1/1/97; includes Contract Amendment #4. Note: Values shown in the Project Summary Report are based on the invoice month. For example Work performed in August would be on the September invoice. Page 8 April 24, 1997 Via Fax Line: 562-4086 (Hardcopy to follow) ilaska Village Electric Cooperative, Inc. 4831 Eagle Street inchorage, Alaska 99503 Attention: Mr. Charles Y. Walls, Chair, ASCC subject: NERC/RAS Reliability Assessment of the Railbelt Interconnected Electric Utility System 1990 Study Update for the Southern Intertie Project Dear Mr. Walls: \ subgroup of NERC’s Reliability Assessment Subcommittee evaluated reliability in the Railbelt System in 1990. This study (copy enclosed) supports the construction of a second transmission tie between Anchorage ind the Kenai Peninsula and has been cited in the feasibility studies for the project. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) presently under preparation for this project includes a section iddressing the “Purpose and Need” for the tie and we intend to use the reliability assessment to support that aspect of the need. Since the information provided is now 7 years old, the assessment should be reviewed and updated if necessary to be a valid support for the EIS. We ask that ASCC request an update of the reliability assessment from NERC/RAS on behalf of the Intertie Participant Group (IPG). The EIS is scheduled to be completed in the fall of this year and information to be included should be available no later than August 1997. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Should you have any questions please contact Dora Gropp, Project Manager at 762-4626, or e-mail to dora_gropp@chugachelectric.com. _. 4 Tat ae nisin) General Manager L i ahw Enclosures Cs IPG General Managers _IPG Technical Representatives Lee Thibert Mike Massin Tom Lovas Jim Wilson W.0.#E9590081, Sec.. RF 5601 Minnesota Drive * PO. Box 196300 * Anchorage. Alaska 99519-6300 Phone 907-563-7494 * FAX 907-562-0027 SENT BY: 5-20-97 ; 8:37AM ; AK VILLAGE ELECTRIC- 907 562 0027;# 1/ 2 — 8 pew PR SCS IILY, AIT CLO IRL P 2 Post Office Bax 66149 . St. Louis, Miasourl 69166-6149 314-821-3222 May 19, 1997 © sCMr. Charles Y. Walls Chairman, Alaska Syatem Coordinating Council AVEC 483) Eagle Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503-7497 Dear Mr. Walls: I received your May 16, 1997 letter today and I want to apologize for not keeping you posted on what the Reliabiliry Assessment Subcornmittee (RAS) has been able to do so far on your request for an updated assessment of the ASCC systems, As you have undoubtedly seen in the press or heard within industry circles, several possible reliability "hot spots” for the upcoming summer have occupied all of the NERC RAS's resources over the past month. Most notable of these hot spots is here in the Midwest where nuclear unit outages projected for this summer will likely cause the available resources and transmission import capability to fall short of firm customer demand in some systems, The NERC Engineering Committee directed the RAS to independently assess this situation as its number one priority. The RAS has completed that assignment and is presently working on two other reliability issues for this summer - the resource situation in the Northeast and the uprating of the Pacific AC/DC ties m wscc. The above background Js a long introduction to explain why the RAS has not been immediately available to start work on the ASCC request for an updated assessment. Here is what has happened so far. At the May 6-8 RAS meeting. we discussed the letter I received from Dora Gropp at Chugach Electric, and possible approaches to micet this request. The RAS agreed to review the previous assessment and formulate a list of data and questions covering information which would help the RAS understand the overall ASCC system and its present situation, I will be leading that effort. After reviewing this new information, the RAS will want to discuss whether or not a formal Regional interview would be beneficial My present plan is to develop the questions/data request in the next two weeks, which would allow an interview in July (if necessary) and a final assessment report to be available before the end of August. I understand that sooner-is-better for the assessment report, and I believe these dates can be improved depending on what happens with the other issues the RAS is dealing with at the present time. 05/20/97 TUE 08:43 [TX/RX NO 8991] Sm By: 5-20-87 ; 8:37AM + AK VILLAGE ELECTRIC~ 907 562 0027;# 2/ 2 res 97 Again, my apologies for this tardy update on the status of your request. Sincerely, David A. Whiteley / Chairman, NERC RAS DAW/omb ec: Eugene N. Bjornstad, Chugach Electric Mike Gent, NERC President Garey Rozier, NERC EC Chairman 05/20/97 TUE 08:43 [TX/RX NO 8991]