HomeMy WebLinkAboutNoatak waste heat Project Agreements & Contracts 1989State of Alaska
N Steve Cowper, Governor
Alaska Energy Authority
A Public Corporation
December 11, 1989
Mr. Earle Ausman, P.E.
Polarconsult Alaska, Inc.
1503 West 334rd Street, Suite 310
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Subject: Contract AEA 2800098, Work Order #8, Naotak
Dear Mr. Ausman:
You are hereby given notice to proceed on Work Order #8 to perform a
concept level design of a waste heat system as presented in your pro-
posal of December 7, 1989 (attached).
Fee for this Work Order shall be a lump sum of $8,870.00 and expenses
shall not exceed $1,365.00. The total cost of work under this Work
Order shall not exceed $10,235.00 unless subsequently revised.
As soon as possible, but no later than February 21, 1990, you will
submit the final report to the Alaska Energy Authority.
Please signify your agreement with the conditions of this Work Order by
signing below and returning this document to the Energy Authority.
Sincerely, yom) Robert E. LeResche /—Executive Director
GS:REL:js
Attachment as stated
cc: Brent N. Petrie, Alaska Energy Authority
David Denig-Chakroff, Alaska Energy Authority
Gary Smith, Alaska Energy Authority
Arnold Reimer, Alaska Energy Authority
Susan White, Alaska Energy Authority
Dominic Costanzo, Alaska Energy Authority
Concurrence with conditions of this Work Order:
POLARCONSULT ALASKA, INC.
Signature Title Date
PO. Box AM Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 465-3575
RMR PO. Box 190869 701 East Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99519-0869 (907) 561-7877
7219/1023(1)
woe USD OF Loew Se er ee
polarconsult alaska, inc.
ENGINEERS « SURVEYORS » ENERGY CONSULTANTS
December 6, 1989
Alaska Power Authority
P.O. Box 190869
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-0869
Subject: Contract APA 2800098
Work Order #5. Waste Heat 9 Villages
Atm: Mr. Gary Smith
Project Manager
Dear Mr. Smith:
This proposal is made in response the scope of work you provided us for doing Concept
Level Designs on nine western Alaska AVEC villages.
This proposal contains a Lotus spread sheet which shows the work items and their
associated fees and expenses. Included is a proposed fee for HMS's estimating work, This
proposal is based on supplying a concept level design in accordance with the work items
as listed in the general work tasks and the individual designs.
Travel is based on a site trip to each village by local carrier then by charter back to a
central location, which will be Kotzebue, Nome or Bethel in the afternoon. If this charter
can be avoided, the local mail carrier will be used. As you can see by the enclosed sheets
from Quality Travel this may be possible in some situations. We will use this potential
cost savings in travel for our weather allowance. We will amempt to work if we are held
up by weather, If we can use our time productively there will be no standby.
We have planned on two people traveling to all of the villages with the exception of the
first two kick off locations. These personnel will be the future designers who will provide
the asbuilt information and get the data necessary for design.
We will attempt to acquire information on land status so we can locate the pipelines in
the most advantageous position, avoiding existing utilities and reducing to the extent
feasible, problems with land acquisition. It is important to note: that we will get what
records we can within the time available. We can not guarantee thar the land records will
be complete or accurate. Only a detailed more time consuming analysis with title
searches by Tom Arminsky will accomplish this.
1503 WEST 33RD STREET * SUITE 310 ¢ ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503 PHONE (907) 258-2420 # TELEFAX (907) 258-2419
- 86 o m a u ‘ ul £ FULHRLUNDSUL |
WASTE HEAT CONCEPT DESIGN PROPOSAL DATA
YEAR 1990
Site Tomxim Final Fee Expenses
Repou Repon.
1. Kivalina 2 Jan 24 Jan $8870 $1106
2. Naotak 2Jan 2 Feb $8870 $1106
3. Wales 2 Jan 7 Feb $8870 $1106
4. Koyuk 2 Jan 13 Feb $8870 $1106
5. Mountain Village 30 Jan 16 Feb $8870 $1106
6, Pilot Station 30 Jan 21 Feb $8870 $1106
7. Scammon Bay 30 Jan 26 Feb $8870 $1106
8, Tununak 30 Jan 1 Mar $8870 $1106
9, Nunapitchuk 30 Jan 6 Mar $8870 $1106
Subtotal $79,830 $9,954
TOTAL $89,784
pm
WASTE HEAT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN SCEDULE FOR 9 VILLAGES
DEC. JAN. FEB. MARCH VILLAGE 417) 48 (25 1 8 15 22 2¢ S 127 19° 26 5 iz eee
Kivalina OFIELD WORK *AEA Review final Report
Noatak OFW *AEA Review OFinal Report
Wales OFW *AEA Review OFing! Report
Koyuk OFW *AEA Review Final Report
Mountain Village OFW *AEA ReviewOFinal Report
Pilot Station OFW *AEA Review OFinai Report
Scammon Bay OFW +*AEA Review OFR
Tununak OFW *AEA Review _ OFR
Nunapitchuk O FW +AEA Review OFR
we. JB SD sdias PERRI to
District Heating Catimate, Est-Ox9
12/04/89
oy j: R333 i 3138 33 Power Use 20 | 5 \ at fezrigjPettosenetee! 3-9) 3 43] | ! | | | ot BB] HE
“Hey al Dyas 1:3] 8:8 #:8 ) 1c | eo 5:8 $20 | 0.0 i) 8 $32 | aeertar Blescoey 5:8 a 0.5 . . , | 1 3:9 . } HH #8
BeE°bate . 8:8 | 8:5 : 0.8 | 2:8 a es a te 38
*ONes, As pullte 2.0 \ 2.0 | $150 | 1| sese $28
Comm. & Reg. Affairs ‘ t ' Fi | 0 133 my om TT eta
"tend Status 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 $90 1 $272 930
SCHOOL DIST Bethel re 1.0 | . $ ii Noma . t:8 | j: 38 Lo Beton | anos | ceees |e == fseeas | aman | oceans ete | Sees a ee | ome
12.5 117.0 @.0 1.0 3.90 1.5 | 0.0 Q.0 c.0 43.0 $525 0.0 30 | FIELD TRIPS ! Review Daca 2.9 1:3 4.0 | 2.0 | Hy 1 uf if freoete, agit ie 9 | 2. bo | 4.0 : 3 Ly i
Arrange Loca Contac/ 1. a SS == aa SS SS == BS 378 3323 338 $516.5 17.0 | 2.0|2.010.0]0.0|0.0c014.0 29.01 $95 |0.0| 80 | | 61,l6¢ | 3196.
FIED coord \ | ' $9,361 $9,361 | $1,040 a my eee | 8 we) rehip | Q. ! fuew re o Pieno t . Soile Date . 1
Community Desires ot i 4
fewer dates ile Rreaiat 8 Gury 8
: 8 Coooeoe Covoewn + nsoe BMA He Beene RUMACNL-O suo: BWA sawn SU WwUe . Late ibution te | 3: ° Peete ies . . baat, | : Records “ 3} E | 3 Pictures . 1 $
TEeatapest 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 1.0 ee 9 yet, Photos . S ‘ 1.0 . . 3 $5 3 #2470 i GRRE Pldene | [Gg] 9] | 20 | | HE] | ah) i Mee btu | AB leo | | L_ ee) BLES] LER] BB
2.2 22.0 (i508 1O.0 | 30 | Te} V0" | 1.0 {a0 | 432.2 | s9,a36 lie.0 | 90 | le3s,049 | 03,808" ANALYSIS j { Const. nagter | 3 4:9 ae 1}: HE $83
. . < i $
$. cena oe ane . . Input 6 ite “us 7 ‘i put Ra t leeds .
1
'
8 . 3.0 1.0 8 .
0
Gaye 5}
si 92, 3 € se | it
915, 206 91,630 {
rapen 0.3 ene — 1.0 | 1.0 i
termine’ hossing : Cet:
E
eet ae 2 ities 1.0 | 0.5 | O.5 t a ue Po ne IO [ Covewoowwe-cosorns o nn ey date sar ~ SACD SAIS | 15.0 | 9.0 [211.0
7k ee | 1 $3! $3 Benge, [EE |? |S | git | 3B deed. gilt Fete, |: Hoe] Genes itor 0.5 . Bi 5 evtie ngs 1.0 | 0.8 3 5 { it
Routing 8:8 B 3 3é8 54
Estimate 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | o8 27.0 \ i
"age connate 0.5 | 0.5 6.0 | 4.0 /1¢. $.0 ise ie ie Hessthse vantage | 8:3 | °F | eee ioee) |s3s8' | Seco b, UG]
Conclusions 1.0 | 0.5 | c.3 | 0.3 0.5 | 1.0 31.5 6 | $1,739 $193
Recommendations 0.5 | 0.3 | C.3 0.5 | 1.0 | 22.5 o | 61,139 $127
Executive Summary 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 0.8 | 2.0 33.6 9 | s1,616 e180
Orawin Site Fien “2 | 4-0 ; S| 4. 9 | 32.382 | $263 Generator 8. $j i: j 13 i £38 2 i: $7 8263 Hiehette | EE| | aa) BLES) HG) BB a i | i
Extended Page 5.1
"tapelon 1.0 | Tiss: 22ei sso | |s | s2,209 | sia
Fase) | 220) rl nel INO Vas” 345-1670 1847575" | |830,072" | 53, 302
Agency Review / Coord. 3.0 3.0 | 1.0 7.0 sso ' 2 $554 $62
Final Sraft Output | 1.0 i 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | | | | 1.0 | 2.0 | 58.5 | | | | $3,150 $350 |
Subtotal 1$1-? 176.) 149.8 | 6.8 [19-0 | 2.9 | @.0 114.0 {26.0 11289.6 |a30,171 134.0 184,770 |