Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Feasibility Study & Report Makushin Geothermal Project 1985
B STONE & WEBSTER Denver Operations Center PROPOSAL TO THE ALEUT CORPORATION COVERING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT MAKUSHIN GEOTHERMAL PROJECT June 21, 1985 W.O. No. 534.389.1 This document contains proprietary information of Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation and is to be returned upon request. Its contents may not be copied, disclosed to third parties, or used for other than the express purpose for which it has been provided without the written consent of Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation. STONE & WEBSTER A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION DENVER OPERATIONS CENTER GREENWOOD PLAZA, DENVER, COLORADO ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO PO. BOX 5406. DENVER. COLORADO 80217-5406 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA BOSTON CHERRY HILL, NJ. OENVER HOUSTON NEW YORK PORTLAND. OREGON RICHLAND, WASHINGTON WASHINGTON. DC. TELEPHONE: 303-741-7700 Wu TELEX:45-4401 Mr. Allan C. Aksell June 21, 1985 Director of Lands and Minerals The Aleut Corporation W.O. 534.389.1 4000 Old Seward Highway Anchorage, Alaska 99503 PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY REPORT MAKUSHIN GEOTHERMAL PROJECT Dear Mr. Aksell: We at Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) appreciate the opportunity to provide The Aleut Corporation (Aleut) with our proposal to evaluate the feasibility of the Makushin Geothermal Project. Our proposal is based upon your letter dated June 3, 1985 and various discussions between you and our Messrs. Ed Varela, John Ehrhardt, and Dave Gonsalves. Definition of the Study The enclosures to this letter provide a detailed discussion of the work we intend to perform and the methods of performing the work. Enclosure 1 - Scope of Work: Defines the studies to be made and the information to be developed. We have developed a study program with strategic decision points to minimize Aleut's costs and risks. Enclosure 2 - Schedule: Shows the timing of major study activities with a bar chart. Enclosure 3 - Project Team: Describes the key people who will be performing the work including an Organization Chart and detailed resumes. Enclosure 4 - Specific Experience: Defines the geothermal experience which make Stone & Webster especially qualified to perform this study and to conduct the subsequent phases of the project. Our intent in preparing these enclosures is to provide a complete picture of the study we envision. We believe we are fully responsive to Aleut's needs as defined in your letter and the verbal discussions. If in reviewing our proposal you identify required changes, we will be pleased to discuss them at your convenience. Mr. Allan C. Aksell June 21, 1985 Page Two Reimbursement SWEC proposes to perform this study as outlined in the attached Scope of Work on a reimbursable basis as follows: For our services as set forth in this proposal we will charge you the salaries (including vacation and holiday allowances) of the employees of our organization for the time they are engaged on the work, plus twenty percent (20%) of such salaries as an allowance for employee benefits, plus sixty-seven percent (67%) of the foregoing total for our overhead and fee. In accordance with our usual practice, expenses incurred for the benefit of the work, including traveling and living expenses of personnel away from their place of assignment; nonlocal communication charges; postage; employer contributions required by law and taxes based on the salaries or wages of employees performing the services; subcontractor costs; and other items of the like direct nature will be for your account. Computer and reproduction charges will be for your account. Computer and reproduction charges will be at our established rates at the time of usage. Outside consultant services, as required, will be billed at cost. As a gesture of our sincere interest in assisting with development of the Makushin Geothermal Project we will defer payment of the overhead and fee component of our services until such time as financing is secured for the project. Payment for salaries, benefits, expenses and subcontractor costs would be made against our monthly invoices. Our invoices will also indicate the deferred overhead and fee amount which will be due as soon as project financing is obtained. Based on the scope defined we estimate approximately 4,000 manhours will be expended and estimate the resultant cost of the study to be $380,000. The following is a breakdown of this estimate in accordance with the phases defined in the Scope of Work: Deferred Salary Overhead Sub- Estimated Related and Fee Contract Estimated Phase Hours Costs Component Expenses Costs Total 1 760 $42,760 ($17,100) $7,300 $16,000 $48,960 2 940 51,450 (20,580) 10,000 81,000 121,870 3 1,900 81,370 (32,550) 8,200 41,000 98,020 4 400 21,920 (8,770) 3,000 16,000 32,150 Subtotal 4,000 $197,500 ($79,000) $28,500 $154,000 $301,000 Deferred Payments $79,000 $79.000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST not including activities to be performed by Aleut as outlined in the attached Scope of Work. $380,000 STONE & WEBSTER a Mr. Allan C. Aksell June 21, 1985 Page Three We at SWEC are very interested in the Makushin Geothermal Project and recognize that much will depend upon the results of this feasibility study. As information develops from the study confirming the feasibility of the project, SWEC would be interested in discussing a more active involvement in the financial aspects of the project. We appreciate the opportunity to propose our services to Aleut and we are prepared to commence work upon your authorization to proceed. This proposal will remain in force for 60 calendar days after receipt and is based on reaching a mutually acceptable contract. After you have had an opportunity to review the enclosed material, should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ed Varela at (303)741-7520. Very truly yours, fymrtenn- .J.M. Plante Vice President STONE & WEBSTER A ° = ni y Operating le i\o Services vray rub Corporation September 1, 1993 Ly Nave, Mr. Mike Hubbard R. W. Beck and Associates, Inc. Suite 210 2522 Arctic Boulevard Anchorage, Alaska 99503-2516 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS ay Subject: Makushin Proforma Dear Mike: Enclosed you will find a hard copy and floppy of the Po eaie for the Makushin Project as promised in our recent meeting in Anchorage. This proforma differs somewhat from the one in the development plan distributed during the recent meeting, but has the same essential result. The goal of a 12¢ sales price in 1992 dollars is realizable without the need for cash contributions or a "rate stabilization fund" from the State. Some additional comments on the proforma follow: a: As before, the proforma is based on a 100% tax exempt project based revenue bond financing with a State moral guarantee. A debt amortization period of 25 years was used. However, based on some alternative runs at 4.5% inflation, a 20 year debt retirement appears possible. Note that a small principal repayment is now made in the first year, and that debt service is levelized in the tenth year. 2. Based on a two-year construction period starting in the spring of 1994, a mid-1996 start of operations was used. Thus, the first year of operations is now taken at 6 months. 3.) As noted above, the rate stabilization fund is zero. 4. A 6 month debt reserve fund is initially established. This . fund builds to a one year’s reserve in about year 14, due to accumulated interest and annual contributions. 5. The $9.3 million debt reserve fund is available for rate ; reduction or other distribution in the year 2020. 6. Although the Makushin project would appear to qualify, no advantage has been taken from the Federal Renewable Energy Incentive. If available, this incentive payment could be used for rate reduction or earlier retirement of the debt. Building One, Suite 255 © 4000 Kruse Way Place ¢ Lake Oswego, OR 97035 © (503) 636-9620 ¢ FAX (503) 697-0288 Mr. Michael D. Hubbard September 1, 1993 Page 2 7. The 1.5¢/kWh to the City has been included. 8. Costs/savings associated with the recommended program alternatives, i.e., helicopter mobilization and deletion of the Nateekin road and pier, are not included in the proforma to retain the same scope as the December 1991 plan. 9. Energy production has been maintained at 82,000 MWh/year. An annual increase in the load would appear supportable and would materially enhance project economics. 10. A Reserve and Contingency Fund has now been included. 11. The Working Capital Fund escalates with inflation. 12. Note that in terms of real dollars, power costs to the users actually decline after year 2005. 13. A Bond rate of 6% was utilized in this proforma. It is likely that a lower rate is obtainable in light of today’s business environment. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me or Roy Ruel. Sincerely, - wl Z Retzlaff. Greg Project Manager GRR424.Let: jsm Enclosures cc: Riley Snell, AIDEA Dave Eberle, AEA Glenn Reed, DCED /027/103/015 File Name: Casei1_25yr.wkl CASE DESCRIPTION Base Case (Alternates Not Incl) Debt amortization 25 Yeare Ae Adjusted 10 Yeare Levelized 15 Yeare Interest capitalized thru construction AIDEA return on equity NA 12.0 cents/kWh 1992 year Target Base Rate = Moral State Guarantee To Bond Holders Bond Issuance Oates: “a Mar-94 “8° Jun-95, Initial Debt Service Reserve 0.5 year Rate Stabilization Fund Net Present Value $0 Bend Site $110,800 State Grant $0 Federal Renewable Energy Incentive soy available © cente/kWh Facility On-line Date Mid 1996 ALTERNATES NOT INCLUDED Alternate 1 Helicopter Mobilization Added Cost 2,800 Alternate 2 Delete Nanteekin Access Savings 1,150 /027/103/015 CAPITAL COST DATA/PARAMETERS: Construction Cost Orilling, Field Development, etc. Alternatives 1 & 2 Net Total Development Costs (w/o financing costs) | Less: Grant Equity Participation AIDEA Processor® Bond Financed Amount. OPERATING COST DATA OPERATING COSTS Annual 08 1996 $ Wellfield Maintenance (included above) Fluid Fee exof Admin & General Insurance Wellfield Insurance Well Reserve Fund Deposit . Steamfield Royalty Years 1-5 3.5xof Years 6-11 4, Stof Years 12-thnreafter - 7.0%0f Annual Energy Sold Energy Losses: Busbar to Load 0.00% City Costs (Levelized) AEA/AIDEA UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL PROJECT Bond Siring Analysis (Oollars in Thousands) FINANCING DATA 30-fug-93 08:46:49 OESI Power Corporation 81,940 Bond Issue Oates (£OM) Mar-94 Jun-95 14,900 Cost of Capital 6.00% ° Reinvestment Rate 4.00% Cost of Issuance 2.50%0f bonds 96,640 Other Coste ° Initial Studies 200 ° Bond Insurance 0.00%0f debt svc R&C Fund Requirement 1,000 ° Working Capital 1,000 ° Bond Funded OSR 3.834%0f bonds 96,640 Debt Amortization Period 25 years Repayment Period Semi-annua) 2 2,900 expenses average Annual Escalation Factor: 135 General 4.50% 150 30 Input DSR Available For Distribution 9,309 busbar cost In Year 2020 busbar cost busbar cost 82,000 MWh 1.5 cente/kWh /027/103/015 CASH FLOW CONSTRUCTION PERIOO SUMMARY Design, ConstructionCapitalize Grant Grant FundBond Fund Interest Oate Total (x) ($000) Oct-93 Oct-93 Nov-93 Dec-93 Ox Jan-94 ox Mar-94 ox sApr-94 “ May-94 3% Jun-94 6% Jul-94 sx fu19-94 sx fug-94 2% Sep-94 x Oct-94 a Nov-94 2 Dec-94 2s dan-9S ax Mar-95 6x Apr-95 2% May-95 ax Jun-95, 6x Jul-95 6x fug-95 sx Aug-95 a Sep-95 ax Oct-95 Bed Nov-95 6% Dec-95 6% Jan-96 6% Mar-96 7% Mar-96 Apr-96 May-96 100% /027/103/015, eoceoeoec eo eC OO OC OO OOOO oO OOOO oO OOOO OOO ($000) 2,905 2,908 $,810 4,642 4,842 1,937 2,908 1,937 1,937 1,937 3,874 5,810 1,937 3,874 5,610 5,610 4,842 1,937 3,874 2,908 5,810 5,810 5,810 6,779 * 96,840 ($000) 1,662 1,662 1,662 1,662 B31 7,479 Fund eocoo eo OCC OB OOO ODO OOOO OOOO OOOO Bond Const Fund eoooo 47,084 44,347 41,630 35,995, 31,310 26,610 24,808 22,018 20,191 18,359 16,520 12,735 6,998 5,116 1,288 42,561 36,917 32,225 30,427 26,677 23,685 18,174 12,444 6,694 (45) (2) 2 26 ENO-0F-PERICO BALANCES Cap Int Fund OSR WC/RC ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 7,479 4,242 2,000 7,479 4,242 2,000 7,479 4,242 2,000 7,479 4,242 2,000 7,479 4,242 2,000 7,479 4,242 2,000 5,817 4,242 2,000 $,817 4,242 2,000 $,617 4,242 2,000 5,817 4,242 2,000 5,817 4,242 2,000 5,617 4,242 2,000 4,155 4,242 2,000 4,185 4,242 2,000 4,155 4,242 2,000 4,188 4,242 2,000 4,188 4,242 2,000 4,158 4,242 2,000 2,493 4,242 2,000 2,493 4,242 2,000 2.493 4,242 2,000 2,493 4,242 2,000 2,493 4,242 2,000 2,493 4,242 2,000 631 4,242 2,000 631 4,242 2,000 331 4,242 2,000 ° 4,242 2,000 Grant 30-fug-93 09:04:07 Interest Earnings ecocoeo oo COO OC OOOO OOOO OOO OFC OOOO Bonds 175 188 142 131 118 110 104 73 55 45 167 150 139 124 us 61 40 23 24 24 2,787 SOURCES: USES: SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Bonds Grant Equity Interest Earnings Grant Bond Funds Total Sources Construction: Project Site Development Alternates 1 & 2 Cost of Issuance Bond Insurance Initial Studies Capitalired Interest SR R&C/WC Funds Equalization Factor Total Uses 110,600 ° 2,787 113,557 81.940 14,900 2.770 200 7,479 4,242 2,000 26 113,557 1027/103/015 09:04:07 30-Aug-93 CASE DESCRIPTION Base Case OESI Power Corporation Calendar Year EXPENSES Operations and Maintenance: Fluid Fee Insurance Wellfield Insurance General & Administrative (owner) Royalty Total Cost of Operations Other Coste: Deposit to OSR Fund Deposit to Well Reserve Deposit to R & C Fund Debt Service To Working Capital Fund City Coste Rate Stabilizaton Fund (RSF) Repayment TOTAL EXPENSES INTEREST & OTHER INCOME From Working Capital Fund Interest Earnings: osR Rate Stabilizaton Fund (RSF) Payment TOTAL OTHER INCOME COST OF POWER Net. Revenue Required From Power Sales Orlivered Cost To Ratepayers Nominal Dollare 1992 Price Levels Cummulative Value RSF Net Present Value RSF /027/NO3/018 1,450 73 75 1s 208 1,685 ° 3,342 1,025 615 6,667 1,000 1,000 5,667 14.3 12.0 ° 2 1997 3,031 303 187 nu 141 429 4,092 6,735 1,050 1,230 13,307 1,045 1,048 12,262 15.0 12.0 ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL PROJECT fnnual Costs of Power (Basel ine) (Dollars in Thousands) 3 4 5 1996 1999 2000 wuueeeae oo seaase=s sxcnaers 3,167 3,309 3,488 317 31 357 164 wat 179 33 4 % _ (147 184 161 \ 448 469 630 4,276 4,469 4,821 150 180 150 300 314 328 52 ss s? 6,801 7,168 7,402 1,097 1,147 1,198 1,230 1,230 1,230 ° ° ° 13,907 14,532 15,186 1,092 1,141 1,193 ° ° ° ° ° ° 1,092 1,14. 1,193 12,614 13,390 13,994 15.6 16.3 17.1 12.0 12.0 12.0 ° ° ° 6 2001 eemansze 3,614 373 187 7 168 5,038 150 342 7,797 1,252 1,230 15,869 1,246 1,246 14,623 17.8 12.0 ? 2002 3,777 390 198 39 176 58,264 150 358 62 8,210 1,309 1,230 16,563 1,302 1,302 18,261 18.6 12.0 8 2003 aaeaeess 3,946 408 204 4. 184 9 5,501 150 374 6s 8,641 1,368 1,230 17,329 1,361 1,361 18,969 19.5 12.0 4,124 426 213 43 192 751 5,749 150 391 9,093 1,429 1,230 16,109 1,422 1,422 16,687 10 2008 4,310 480 223 45 201 1,221 6,478 150 406 a 9,093 1,494 1,230 16,924 1,466 1,486 17,438 21.3 12.0 ii 2006 waassoxe 4,504 sol 233 47? 210 1,276 6,770 150 427 74 8,198 1,561 1,230 18,409 1,553 1,553 16,886 20.6 Led 12 2007 aasacexa 4,706 $24 243 49 219 1,333 7,075 150 446 100 8,198 1,631 1,230 18,629 1,623 1,623 17,206 21.0 10.8 13 2008 eeesacsa 4,918 548 254 $1 229 1,393 7,393 1,696 17,550 14 2009 $,139 $72 266 53 239 1,456 7,726 487 109 8,198 1,781 1,230 19,530 1,772 1,772 17,783 21.7 10.2 15 2010 8,371 58 276 250 1,521 8,073 509 114 8,193 1,861 1,230 19,985 1,652 372 2,224 17,761 7027/103/015 09:04:07 30-fug-93 CASE DESCRIPTION Base Case O€SI Power Corporation Calendar Year EXPENSES Operations and Maintenance: Fluid Fee Insurance Wellfield Insurance General & Administrative (owner) Royalty Total Cost of Operations Other Coste: Deposit to 0SR Fund Deposit to Well Reserve Deposit to R & C Fund Debt Service To Working Capital Fund City Costs Rate Stabilizaton Fund (RSF) Repayment TOTAL EXPENSES INTEREST & OTHER INCOME From Working Capital Fund Interest Earnings: OsR Rate Stabiliraton Fund (RSF) Payment TOTAL OTHER INCOME COST OF POWER Net Revenue Required From Power Sales Delivered Cost To Ratepayers Nominal Oollare 1992 Price Levels Cummulative Value RSF Net Present Value RSF LO7?7I/NVONIONS, 16 2011 $8,612 625 261 1,590 8,437 $32 119 8,196 1,945 1,230 20,460 1,935 372 2,308 16,153 22.1 9.6 17 2012 $,865 653 303 61 273 1,661 6,616 586 125 6,198 2,032 1,230 20,987 2,022 372 2,395 16,562 22.6 9.4 168 2013 6,129 682 317 63 265 1,736 9,213 S81 150 8,198 2,124 21,495 2,113 372 2,466 19,009 23.2 9.2 19 2014 6,405 713 331 1,614 9,627 607 187 8,193 2,220 1.230 22,038 2,206 372 2,581 19,457 23.7 9.0 20 2015 6,693 748 346 69 312 1,696 10,061 634 164 6,198 2,319 1,230 22,606 2,680 19,925 24.3 8.8 2 2016 eeaseass 6,994 779 342 72 326 1,981 10,513 23,228 2,412 372 2,784 20,443 24.9 8.7 378 76 340 2,070 10,967 692 8,196 2,833 1,230 23,649 2,820 v2 2,693 20,956 28.6 8.5 23 2018 7,638 850 395 79 356 2,163 11,481 724 218 8,198 2,647 1,230 24,497 2,634 372 3,006 21,491 26.2 8.3 24 2019 7,981 ais 83 372 2.261 11,998 756 350 8,198 2.766 1,230 28,297 2,752 372 3,125 22,173 27.0 8.2 2s 2020 8,340 929 ast 2,362 12,537 26,011 2,876 372 3,248 22,763 27.8 8.1 26 2021 8.716 970 asi 406 2,469 13,102 826 3,020 1,230 16,560 3,008 3,005 15,555 19.0 5.3 27 2022 9,106 1,014 arn 94 424 2,580 13,691 3,186 1,230 19,340 3,14 3,141 16,199 19.6 s.3 2023 9,516 1,060 492 98 443 2,696 14,307 ~2 417 3,298 1,230 ° 20,155 16,873 20.6 s.3 3,447 1,230 21,006 3,430 3,430 17,877 21.4 5.2 2025 10,394 1,157 $33 108 484 2.944 18,624 3,602 1,230 21,896 3,564 16,312 22.3 5.2 /027/103/015 ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY O-fug-93 09:04:07 UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL PROJECT Reserve Fund Interest Earnings (Dollars in Thousands) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 aw 12 13 14 1s Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2008 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Working Capital Fund Beginning of Period Balance 1,000 1,048 1,092 1,141 1,193 1,246 1,302 1,361 1,422 1,486 1,583 1,623 1,696 1,772 1,882 fnnual Deposit 1,025 1,050 1,097 1,147 1,198 1,252 1,309 1,368 1,429 1,494 1,861 1,631 1,704 1,781 1,861 Interest Earnings 20 42 44 46 48 ) sz 84 8? 59 62 65 68 a 74 Annual Withdrawal (1,000) (1,045) (1,092) (1,141) (1,193) (1,246) (1,302) (1,361) (1.422) (1,486) (1,853) (1,623) (1,696) (1,772) (1,852) End of Period Balance 1,045 1,092 1,141 1,193 1,246 1,302 1,361 1,422 1,486 1,553 1,623 1,696 1,772 1,852 1,938 Debt Service Reserve Fund Beginning of Period Balance 4,242 4,327 4,500 4,830 5,174 5,530 5,902 6,288 6,689 7,107 7,841 7,993 8,463 8,981 9,309 Annual Deposit ° ° 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 ° ° Interest Earnings 8s 173 180 193 207 221 236 282 268 734 302 320 339 358 372 Annual Withdrawal ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° (372) Debt Service Shortfall ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° End of Period Balance 4,327 4,500 4,630 8,174 5,530 5,902 6,268 6,689 7,107 7,541 7,993 8,463 8,951 9,309 9,309 Well Reserve Fund Beginning of Period Balance ° ° 153 462 791 1,141 1,513 89 472 80 1,314 1,776 2,266 2.787 864 Annual Deposit ° 150 300 314 328 342 388 374 391 408 427 446 466 497 509 Well Rehab (1,783) (2,427) Interest Earnings ° 3 9 16 22 30 2 9 17 26 35 44a ss 17 27 End of Period Balance ° 1s3 462 791 1,14 1,513 a9 472 630 1.14 1,776 2,266 2,787 R64 1,400 R&C Fund Beginning of Period Balance 1,000 1,030 1,122 a4 1,007 1,105 nas 943 1,047 723 824 935 $83 682 21 Annual Deposit ° 50 82 8s 7 60 62 6S 63 ” 7 100 105 109 114 Renewals (300) (358) (427) (809) (607) Interest Earnings 30 a2 40 38 a 38 35 39 35 30 34 2 24 29 23 End of Period Balance 1,030 1,122 o14 1,007 1,105 Bas 943 1,047 723 924 933 $53 682 821 351 7027/103/015 Oe /027/103/015 30-fug-93 09:04:07 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 wo Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2028 Beginning of Period Balance 1,852 1,935 2,022 2,113 2,206 2,308 2,412 2,520 2,634 2,752 2,876 3,005 3,141 3,282 3,430 3,534 Annual Deposit 1,661 1,945 2,032 2,124 2.220 2,319 2,424 2,533 2,647 2.766 2,890 3,020 3,186 3,298 3,447 3,602 Interest Earnings 74 77 a1 6s es 92 96 101 108 110 11s 120 126 13. 137 143 fnnual Withdrawal (1,882) (4,935) (2,022) (2,113) (2,208) (2,308) (2,412) (2,820) (2,634) (2,752) (2,876) (3,005) (3,141) (3,282) (5,430) (3,584) End of Period Balance 1,935 2,022 2,113 2,208 2,308 2,412 2,520 2,634 2,752 2,876 3,005 3,141 3,282 3,430 3,564 3,745 ‘ Beginning of Period Balance 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 Annual Deposit ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° Interest Earnings 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 fonual Withdrawal (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) (372) Debt Service Shortfall ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° End of Period Balance 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 9,309 Beginning of Period Balance 064 1,400 1,970 2,576 3,220 3,903 4,628 2,028 2,774 3,568 4,410 5,304 6,253 7,288 8,323 9,450 Annual Deposit $09 532 586 sai 607 634 663 692 724 756 790 826 863 902 942 985 Well Rehab . (3,303) Interest Earnings 27 39 st 63 7 1 40 54 70 86 104 123 142 163 185 209 End of Period Balance 1,400 1,970 2,576 * 3,220 3,903 4,628 2,028 2,774 3,568 4,410 5,304 6,253 7,258 8,323 9,450 10,643 Beginning of Period Balance 21 351 487 633 144 309 489 (61) 150 379 (4s) 223 621 17 aaa 906 Annual Deposit 114 119 128 150 157 164 200 209 218 350 366 3e2z 399 41? 436 456 Renewals (607) (655) (758) (878) (1,016) Interest Earnings 23 16 22 15 9 16 8 2 10 s 2 17 13 9 26 4s End of Period Balance 351 487 633 144 309 489 (61) 150 379 (14s) 223 621 17 aaa 906 1,407 ENCLOSURE 1 - SCOPE OF WORK SWEC proposes to perform the feasibility study of the Makushin Geothermal Project with a four-phased approach. The work is broken down into the following phases: Phase 1 - Prefeasibility study 2 - Conceptual Design 3 - Preliminary Engineering 4 - Final Feasibility Assessment and Report The proposed schedule for the study covers seven months, assumes a start in August, 1985, and a completion in February, 1986. The following discussion of the scope of the study and the methodology is intended to flow along with the schedule included in the SCHEDULE section. Schedule The schedule has been divided into the elements that Aleut identified in the RFP. Many of these elements may require work in all four phases. However, in order to provide for "Go/No Go" decision points and an orderly progression of work, we have outlined an approach to proceed from what is presently known, through generalized areas of study leading to project specific information and analysis. This approach will also minimize the financial burden on Aleut during the early part of the feasibility study, and hopefully, provide a basis to attract outside investment to support subsequent phases of the study. The overall purpose of the feasibility study will be to determine the technical and financial feasibility, and to provide a detailed definition of the project. The report of the feasibility study will be a quality product to demonstrate the feasibility study effort and results. Phase 1 - Prefeasibility During this phase, several simultaneous activities will be conducted. These activities would be based on available data for the resource, published information, and SWEC in-house documents. A site visit will be conducted by SWEC's Project Manager. The objective will be to quickly and simply analyze the key elements to support the likeliness that a feasible project can be developed. Specific activities will include: 1. Prepare a study of alternatives for providing electric power to Dutch Harbor and the City of Unalaska. This study will be based on published data from existing reports on the resource, and other available information. Alternatives to be considered will include wind, existing generation (diesel's), small and large scale geothermal. Only packaged geothermal units or modules will be studied. This alternative study will address such critical factors as sensitivity to size and transmission costs of geothermal units, falling oil prices and electrical energy prices. If data is available, this study will also address load growth on the island. 2. Provide a preliminary evaluation of the resource based on the work performed by Republic Geothermal for the Alaska Power Authority. This evaluation will address small and large scale development and identify order of magnitude costs of royalties (if any), and development and production costs. STONE & WEBSTER A 3. At least two basic power generation cycles and size ranges will be developed for further consideration during the feasibility study. One will consist of commercially available packaged units using a binary cycle. These would be developed in blocks of approximately 1 to 3 MW (small scale development). The second would consist of modular constructed units in the 5 to 10 MW range (large scale). These would be either binary cycle or rotary separator total energy plants. 4. Access - A study will be performed to determine the method of obtaining access during construction and operation. Based on the size of the development contemplated, an access road will be investigated and compared to the use of helecopters and/or off-road equipment and vehicles. 5. Minimum investment transmission systems will be postulated. For the small scale development, this will consist of a line to meet safety codes but would not meet usual minimum utility reliability criteria and might suffer outages under extreme environmental conditions. It would also have limited growth capability. Possible future growth of the geothermal plant would require significant upgrade or replacement. For the large scale development, this will be a system meeting normal utility reliability requirements and would have growth capacity. 6. Asa first cut for evaluation purposes, O & M costs would be developed for each alternative being considered. 7. A preliminary schedule would be developed for the project. 8. During this period we would expect that Aleut, with our assistance as required, would obtain local and state input, interest and support, and would identify any major obstacles to the project, if any. 9. Finally a report will be prepared summarizing the prefeasibility study for this project. Phase 2 - Conceptual Design Assuming that the results of the prefeasibility study are favorable and that funds are provided, Phase 2 of the feasibility study will establish the concepts of a specific project. The actual activities to be accomplished during this phase will be better defined as a result of Phase 1 but in general will consist of the following: 1. Resource Development - plan the production wells and reinjection wells (or spent geothermal fluid surface disposal system) including drilling equipment requirements. 2. Power Plant - prepare plant facility layout and establish major features such as modulization, shelter, personnel facilities and the like. 3. Access Roads - layout roads (or plan alternate access). Existing roadbeds will be investigated for suitability. 4. Transmission Line - select the route, establish substation requirements including locations and layout, and prepare transmission line design criteria. STONE & WEBSTER A 5. Conduct site specific (on site) investigations of soils, aggregate locations and sources, aerial photography, site surveys and the like. 6. During this phase, we would anticipate that you would initiate a public relations effort, open discussions leading to a power sales agreement, establish ownership of facilities, and determine permit requirements and environmental concerns for the project. These efforts would entail use of local firms and/or your personnel with SWEC support as required. Phase 3 - Preliminary Engineering During this phase, the work would consist of further project definition, development of project specific documents, initiation of the total cost estimating effort and definative project planning activities. The specific activities of this phase will be modified considering the time of year, funding available, and the overall project financing and planning strategy beginning to be formulated. In general these will consist of the following: 1. Resource Development - Establish process flows, well testing requirements, down hole pumps, wellhead equipment, piping system and the like. 2. Power Generation Facilities - prepare preliminary P & ID's, electrical one line diagrams, design criteria, civil, electrical and mechanical equipment specifications and calculate expected plant output. Also obtain proposals for major equipment modules. 3. Access - If a road is contemplated, develop cut & fill requirements & define equipment requirements. 4. Transmission - Prepare plan and profile drawings, select conductors, establish structures and define submarine cable requirements. Also prepare substation layouts, one line diagrams and define equipment requirements. 5. O & M - establish operation and maintenance staffing/contract maintenance and define costs estimates for the project. 6. Prepare a detailed plan for the procurement, fabrication, detailed engineering, construction and startup of the project. 7. Start the total investment cost estimate effort to be finalized in phase 4. 8. During this period we assume that the negotiations leading to the power sales agreement would continue as well as initial efforts to promote and finance the project. Phase 4 - Final Feasibility Assessment and Report This phase would consist of completion of the tasks started in previous phases and preparing a final report of the feasibility study (in draft form initially). The specific activities of this phase would include: 1. Update the prefeasibility alternatives study to reflect current information and to reflect the specific project planned. 2. Finalize the assessment of the geothermal resources for the specific development planned. STONE & WEBSTER A Define guarantees that might be obtained and included in the cost estimates, based on equipment proposals and other information available at the time. Complete the total investment cost estimate. Prepare a final feasibility study report initially in draft form to reflect the various elements, methodology, results, work products, and assessments. We assume that Aleut would apply for and obtain all necessary permits, based on the data developed in previous phases of the study for the specific project. Also the power sales agreement should be finalized. STONE & WEBSTER a (MARKET RESOURCE RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT Pow PLAN T~ » IOCE. wo IW ! OPERATION § HIAINIEMANCE LER FOR AME GUARANTEES PERLIITS, EASE. MENTS LICENSES ewe eee SCHEDULE oT. cost LIAKGSHIN GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY _STUDY SCHEDULE 1938 5- ' AUG ’ SE Ps. L ocr ph Avrov ' vec ory AUS 1. PRE- FEASIBILITY ALTERNATWES STUDY Es: PRELIM ASSESSAIENT | SELECT CYCLE, WIT] SIZES, OUTPET ——0o| | STYOY 4O0A0S VS p HELOS F ATVE 0% MIN INVESTMENT- C T-LiINE PLANS 9 J PRELIM OFM AEGMTS f £0375 5 7 PRELIVY SCHEDULE (j— D ENUIRONAHE TAL Caen 2. CONCEPTUAL. DES/GN PEVELOPHENT: . PLAN PLANT LAYOUT £ STATOR, FEATURES - MODULES L7?6 FES TAN 2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING | 44 FAL ASSESSMENT § REI PROCESS FtOws, WELL TEST REQHTS DEFINE PLHPS, EQUIP § PIPING FREI PYT DS, ONE LINES, SPECS, DESIGN CRITERIA, OUTPUT CALCS LAY OUT ACCESS ROADS CF RERD) lar gee} i SELECT ROUTE, SET | INTERCONNECT POINTS | il SITE SURVEYS, GEO TECH | Poa tt DOENTIFY REQHTS 7 | OBTAIN LOCAL 1 P PR, PREL//1 SALES AGREE | TDENT Fy PROBLE}IS MENT; ESTABUSH OWNERS ONTINCED EFFORT pO | fo 0 REQHTS f COSTS — L MAJOR EQUIP PROPOSALS DEVELOP | curdFues, EQUIPMENT ' PLAN t PROFUES CONDLCTORS, STROC sECEcT PORES SUB ARE LAYOUT SUBSTATIONS REFINE O err | ENGR, PROCURK(IENT § CONSTEKT AN DETAILED +ULESTONE SHEDUALE : PREPARE TOTAL QMNPLETE OVARANTEE S er | OBTAIN PERMITS, ETC ——_—_—_—=*»> FINALI@E POWER SALES DRAFT REPORT FEASIBIITY FINAL ASSESSMENT DEFINE. COST ESTIMATE STONE WEBSTER ENGINEIERING CORP DENVER, COLOKADS TONE 19 6S ENCLOSURE 3 - PROJECT TEAM SWEC has assembled a highly qualified Project Team to accomplish the feasibility study and report for the Makushin Geothermal Project. The proposed organization is shown in the attached Personnel Organization Chart. Detailed resumes of our proposed personnel are included in this section. The functional responsibilities of each project position will be as follows: Project Manager - As Project Manager, Mr. Robert R. Henss will be responsible to the Aleut Corporation and to SWEC for the overall administrative and technical efforts on the feasibility study and report; for the application of SWEC resources to the work; for the coordination of project support functions; and for the quality and timeliness of the work. Mr. Henss is a registered Professional Engineer in seven states, including Alaska, and brings over 34 years of experience in the engineering and construction industry to this assignment. Mr. Henss is very well qualified for this assignment as he has been responsible for every aspect of a power plant during his professional career. He has managed the engineering; performed preliminary engineering and feasibility studies; managed the construction of a project; and as Project Manager has been responsible for managing all aspects simultaneously of a project. He has performed numerous assignments in the electric power generating field including nuclear, fossil and geothermal projects. Included in his most recent experience as Project Manager are three geothermal assignments. He was responsible for the Feasibility/Cost Study for a new geothermal power plant in The Geysers for Thermal Power Company; he managed the Permitting, Environmental and Preliminary Engineering Services for Natomas Energy Company also in The Geysers; and, he led the overall effort and contractual compliance aspects for developing an engineer's cost estimate for a twin modular geothermal plant in Hawaii for Thermal Power Company. Project Engineer - Reporting to Mr. Henss and in direct charge of the technical aspects of the feasibility study and report will be Mr. Robert E. Tucker as Project Engineer. Mr. Tucker is a registered Professional Engineer in Alaska and brings the experience from numerous geothermal asssignments to this effort. He has held key positions on every major geothermal project and study effort Stone & Webster has undertaken. His experiences include both flash and binary cycle projects. He has also prepared and published several papers on the economic aspects of geothermal power generation. Electrical/Transmission Engineer - Mr. Ed Johnson will be responsible for the electrical and transmission study and design aspects of the assignment. He has been involved with all aspects of electrical engineering in power plants and transmission design. Civil/Structural Engineer - Mr. Mike Mason will prepare the civil and structural portions of the study and report. He has been Lead Structural and Civil Engineer on several power plant projects including four geothermal projects in The Geysers: Mr. Mason also led the civil/structural work for the Bristol Bay Regional Power Feasibility Study for the Alaska Power Authority. He is a registered Professional Engineer in five states, including Alaska, and has over 18 years experience in the engineering profession. STONE & WEBSTER A - Environmental and Permitting - Mr. Mike Barningham will assist with the Environmental aspects and permitting requirements in the feasibility study and report. Mr. Barningham has over fourteen years experience in environmental planning and permitting. He has been responsible for environmental and permitting on several hydroelectric projects and numerous transmission line projects including the Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project on the Kenai Penninsula and the Anchorage-Fairbanks Transmission Intertie. Local Consultant - Mr. Walter G. Bagley will provide advice and assistance regarding matters of a local and Alaskan nature. He will also be available to assist in coordinating with local contractors and The Aleut Corporation. Mr. Bagley is a long time Alaska resident and has been called upon for his technical expertise by several Alaska concerns including the Alaska Power Authority, and Alaska Gas and Service Company. Mr. Bagley, having served on the Board of Directors to Chugach Electric Association, Inc., is keenly aware of the issues facing the electrical generation industry in Alaska. He has had extensive experience in all aspects of mechanical engineering and electrical generating facilities with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Support Services Staff Functions - We have identified supporting services for which the Project Manager can call upon as required. Mr. Joe Missel will provide constructibility input and review of engineering and design. He has over 31 years of progressively responsible experience in the construction industry. Mr. Missel recently completed his assignment as Senior Construction Site Representative for the Occidental Geothermal Project in The Geysers Area of northern California where he was responsible for the management of construction of the complete geothermal plant with 2 units rated at 48 MW each. Mr. Missel is thoroughly familiar with the aspects of remote site construction as many of his assignments have involved remote locations and harsh environments. Mr. Missel is currently serving as a Construction Specialist for the Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project on the Kenai Penninsula. Mr. L.V. Popat has over 26 years experience in estimating and cost control. He will provide estimating support for the engineering team. He has provided estimating support for several Alaska projects including the Bristol Bay and Cordova Area Regional Power Feasibility Studies and the Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project for the Alaska Power Authority. Mr. Merrell Anderson, with over 29 years experience in management and project planning, will assist in the scheduling of project activities. Assignment of these professionals in supporting roles to the Project Manager will place extremely valuable resources at his disposal. STONE & WEBSTER A THE ALEUT CORPORATION Allan C. Aksell STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION DENVER OPERATIONS CENTER MANAGER J.J.M. Plante, Vice President STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 5 A0685027 PROJECT MANAGER Robert R. Henss * LOCAL CONSULTANT Walter G. Bagley ** PROJECT ENGINEER Robert E. Tucker * SUPPORT SERVICES STAFF FUNCTION CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST Joseph M. Missel ESTIMATING AND COST L.V. Popat * PLANNING AND SCHEDULING Merrell R. Anderson RESOURCE ASSESSMENT CONSULTANT *ALASKA P.E. ** ALASKA RESIDENT TRANSMISSION AND CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER ENGINEER Edwin J. Johnson Michael R. Mason * PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERMITTING Michael L. Barningham FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT MAKUSHIN GEOTHERMAL PROJECT JUNE 1985 STONE & WEBSTER A ROBERT R. HENSS PROJECT MANAGER EDUCATION University of Illinois - B.S. in Civil Engineering (Construction Option) Various Continuing Education Courses and Management Workshops LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer, Illinois - Active Civil Engineer, lowa - Inactive Professional Engineer, New Mexico - Active Civil Engineer, California - Active Professional Engineer, Colorado - Active Professional Engineer, Alaska - Active Professional Engineer, Texas - Active PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers - Member EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Henss has over 34 years of experience in the engineering and construction industry. Currently, as Project Manager, he has assignments in the power generation field. His responsibilities with Stone & Webster have included the development of a design procedures manual that is appropriate to fossil fuel power plants constructed for rural electric cooperatives, the overall management of studies related to the development of geothermal power generation projects, and the overall management of a_ technical assessment and cost estimate for a proposed resource recovery facility fueled by shredded rubber tires. His most recent assignment, as Project Manager, was the overall management of a contract to design and manage construction of a photovoltaic power generation facility. Prior to joining Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Mr. Henss' work experience included assignments as Construction Management Advisor, Director of Power Plant Construction, Design and Construction Manager, Estimating Manager, Civil Engineer, Resident Engineer, and Design Engineer on various construction projects including fossil and nuclear-fueled power plants, bridges, high-rise buildings, steel mills, water treatment facilities, and industrial projects. Mr. Henss' work assignments have been located throughout the United States with a majority of assignments in the southwestern area. Some assignments required travel to the Caribbean, South America, and the Middle East. STONE & WEBSTER A ROBERT R. HENSS DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado Model Project Design Manual As Project Manager, responsible for the preparation and publication of a Model Project Design Manual that is appropriate to the design and construction of a generating plant when performed under the requirements of the Rural Electrification Administration. Thermal Power Company Geysers Project Feasibility/Cost Study As Project Manager, responsible for the overall administrative guidance and contractural compliance aspects of a contract for a study to provide an order-of-magnitude cost estimate and a discussion of the licensing aspects of a new geothermal power plant. Natomas Energy Company Geysers Project Permitting, Environmental and Preliminary Engineering Services As Project Manager, responsible for the overall administrative guidance and compliance with a contract for the preparation of information necessary to submit an Application for Certification to the California Energy Commission for a new goethermal power plant. Thermal Power Company Puna Geothermal Venture Project Engineers Cost Estimate As Project Manager, responsible for the overall administrative guidance and contractural compliance aspects of a contract for developing an engineer's cost estimate for a twin modular geothermal power plant. Garb-Oil Corporation Resource Recovery Facility Project Cost Estimate and Technical Assessment As Project Manager, responsible for the overall administrative guidance and contractural compliance aspects of a contract for developing an engineer's cost estimate for total installed cost of a 35 MW Resource Recovery Facility. In addition, the contract required a technical assessment of the feasibility of shredding and burning tires in a fluidized bed combustor, generating steam in a waste-heat boiler, and treating and disposing of combustion process by-products. ROBERT R. HENSS Engineering and Consulting Services Photovoltaic Power Plant Project Sacramento Municipal Utility District As Project Manager, responsible for the overall administrative guidance and contractural compliance aspects of a contract for performing engineering and consulting tasks required to support SMUD in its 5 MW (third phase) addition to its Photovoltaic Power Plant Project. The contract requires SWEC to perform a design technology selection study, design optimization studies, specific designs and specifications for procurement of equipment and construction services, and also perform construction management services. JOHNSON BROS. CORPORATION Litchfield, Minnesota As Construction Management Advisor, served as an individual contributor within the Plant and Industrial Division. Was responsible for certain business development procedures and construction management advisory services that were appropriate to a general contractor performing both domestic and overseas work. Business development procedures included presenting Johnson Bros. Corporation qualifications and capabilities to perform power plant construction work. Management advisory services included assistance to Johnson Bros. Corporation personnel in the areas of scheduling, estimating, quality assurance and control, labor relations, claims identification and contract performance requirements. PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY Fort Collins, Colorado As Director of Power Plant Construction, organized and supervised the administrative work effort of the construction group during the planning phases of Rawhide 1, a 250 MW coal-fired power plant. Responsibilities included planning for effective supervision of power plant engineering and site management activities, recommending and monitoring budgets, negotiating a project labor agreement, and informing the Authority's staff about construction requirements and contract payment obligations. Specific duties performed included: (a) Identified needs of the construction management functions and administered consulting and support services to meet those needs. (b) Assisted in the selection of satisfactory and cost effective proposals for equipment and services. STONE & WEBSTER A ROBERT R. HENSS (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Reviewed documents prepared for construction management activities including budgets, procedures, plans and schedules, system analysis and _ designs, specifications, diagrams, manuals, and training; and recommended changes as required. Issued or approved contract modifications. Monitored construction schedules and informed management of progress, delays, or changed conditions. Established and administered specific onsite activities including labor relations, site security, and safety. Assured that the Authority's administrative policies and procedures were properly applied for employees under his supervision. COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Montrose, Colorado As Design and Construction Manager, organized and supervised the administrative work effort of the Generation Design and Construction Department during the construction of major fossil-fueled power plants. The major power plants contemplated or under construction included Craig Station Units 1, 2, and 3 at 400 MW each. Specific work efforts included: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Selection and supervision of the 20-man department staff. Direction of the consulting engineer selection process and engineering contract negotiation processes. General guidance and monitoring of the consulting engineer's work effort. Participation in the review/bidding/negotiation of construction and material procurement contracts. Monitored progress of contract performance in terms of schedule, cost, and quality. Monitored adequacy of contract performance in terms of contract's contractual and technical requirements. Guided and monitored documentation processes. ROBERT R. HENSS GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Schenectady, New York As Estimating Manager, organized and supervised the Central Cost Estimating function for the Project Engineering Operation within the Installation and Service Engineering Department. Provided a comprehensive estimating and cost monitoring service for domestic and international work. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY San Jose, California As Project Engineer, served as an individual contributor within the Nuclear Energy Division (APED) - TOPO, and formulated methods of cost accumulation and evaluation, and established methods of cost forecasting for major nuclear power plant construction. BECHTEL CORPORATION San Francisco, California As Senior Estimator, responsible for project cost estimating for fossil-fueled and nuclear-fueled plants. As Senior Field Engineer, directed the work effort of the field cost administration group. CUCKLER STEEL SPAN COMPANY Monticello, lowa As Engineering Department Manager, directed Engineering Department work efforts for design and detailing of metal buildings. Established a computer installation, including programs, for structural analysis. J. L. SIMMONS COMPANY Chicago, Illinois As Civil Engineer, investigated computer applications for general contractors. STANLEY ENGINEERING COMPANY Muscatine, lowa As Resident Engineer, responsible for field supervision of construction of fossil-fueled power plants and other utilities. As Section Head, directed the work effort of field survey crews. BALKE AND CLARK Urbana, IIlinois As Design Engineer, designed concrete and steel structures; supervised construction, inspection, and field survey groups. STONE & WEBSTER A ROBERT R. HENSS BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY Chicago, Illinois As Field Engineer, performed construction supervision of fabricated steel erection for bridges, buildings, and industrial structures. ROBERT E. TUCKER PROJECT ENGINEER EDUCATION University of Washington - Arctic Engineering Course Colorado State University - Graduate Management Course Purdue University - MSME Thesis Title: Thermodynamic Analysis of Cogeneration Power Cycle Purdue University - BSME LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Colorado, Alaska PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Mechanical Engineers - Member PUBLICATIONS "SMUDGEO #1 - Economic Impacts on Geothermal Power Plant Design", principle author, presented at the Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 11, 1980. "Geothermal Power Cycle Considerations", principle author, presented at the Pacific Coast Electric Association's 46th Annual Engineering and Operating Conference, Los Angeles, California, March 20, 1981. "Occidental Geothermal No. 1 - An Innovative Plant Design", principle author, presented at the Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, October 12, 1982. EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Tucker has been Senior Power Engineer, assigned as a Project Engineer for several geothermal power plant feasibility studies, and recently was the Project Engineer for permitting, environmental, and preliminary engineering activities for a 25 MW geothermal power plant in The Geysers. As such, he is responsible for all engineering, including administration, coordination, execution, and cost of these activities. As a Power Engineer assigned to supervise the Heat Balance and Studies Group activities at the Denver Operations Center, he was involved in predicting fossil and geothermal power plant cycle performance and performing economic evaluations associated with equipment selection. In such a capacity, he has coordinated the Heat Balance and Studies Group work on several large steam-electric generating stations. He has also assisted in the preliminary engineering, licensing, cycle optimization, and/or detailed engineering of four major geothermal power projects. In addition, he is involved in the training of Results Engineers. Prior to joining Stone & Webster, he held several positions as an Engineer. He served as Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Tri-State University, Teaching Assistant and research in cogeneration power cycles at Purdue University, and Field Mechanical Engineer with J. A. Jones Construction Company, and gained cooperative work experience with Bechtel Power Corporation. STONE & WEBSTER A ROBERT E. TUCKER DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado Assigned as a Senior Power Engineer at the Denver Operations Center, Mr. Tucker has been a Geothermal Consultant or Project Engineer in the following capacities: Nebraska Public Power District Performance Engineering Training As Program Coordinator and Principal Instructor, responsible for the preparation and implementation of a performance engineering course for utility personnel. The course included review of basic thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer. The course also included power plant fundamentals, heat balance and equipment performance calculations, system loss identification, performance testing and computer analysis, and engineering economics. Turlock Irrigation District Review of NCPA Geothermal Project No. 3 As Project Manager, responsible for coordinating the independent technical review of the 110 MW geothermal power plant in The Geysers for potential participation by Turlock Irrigation District. The review included assessment of critical design parameters, construction schedule, and capital cost. Geothermal Resources International, Inc. Aidlin Geothermal Plant No. 1 Geothermal Consultant managing the conceptual engineering of a 12.5 MW geothermal plant in The Geysers. As Consultant, he was responsible for the determination of key plant design parameters for the project and the specification of major components including: turbine generator, condenser, cooling tower, and noncondensible gas compressors. Thermal Power Company Puna Geothermal Venture Project Engineer for an engineering estimate of twin modular 12.5 MW geothermal units on the island of Hawaii. Natomas Energy Company Davies Project As Project Engineer, responsible for the permitting, environmental, and preliminary engineering activities for a 25 MW geothermal power plant in The Geysers. This effort culminated in the publication of a Use Permit Application to the Lake County Planning Commission. As Project Engineer, he was responsible for the technical and administrative coordination of the 650-page document involving 21 authors from seven firms. ROBERT E. TUCKER Thermal Power Company Davies Project Project Engineer on conceptual and feasibility studies for a potential 25 MW geothermal power plant in The Geysers. Assigned as a Power Engineer supervising Heat Balance and Studies Group activities at the Denver Operations Center, Mr. Tucker's experience includes the following: Confidential Client Well-Head Generating Feasibility Studies Project Engineer for conceptual feasibility study of low temperature electric generation using an organic rankine cycle and study of rotary separator turbine for high temperature geothermal well-head generator. Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Supervised SWEC in-house program to research "State-of-the-Art" in organic Rankine cycle power plants, to assess available equipment suppliers and develop SWEC computer capabilities for modeling ORC performance. Chaffee Geothermal, Ltd. Geothermal Pipeline Coordinated Heat Balance and Studies Group work for the preliminary engineering and cost estimate of the 6.5-mile geothermal pipeline. OPC Bio-Energy Corporation 11.5 MW Biomass - Combined Cycle Power Plant Supervised combined cycle heat balance computer development, development of economic evaluation factors, and preliminary cycle evaluations. Confidential Client 540 MW - Coal-fired Power Plant Coordinated conceptual engineering effort in the following areas: development of economic evaluation parameters, projectization of reference plant studies, preliminary heat balances, and study of alternative cooling systems. Alaska Power Authority Bristol Bay Power Plant Feasibility Coordinated geothermal feasibility effort and economic evaluations of all prospective alternatives. STONE & WEBSTER A ROBERT E. TUCKER Thermal Power Company/Dillingham Corporation HELCO 25 MW Geothermal Power Plant Assisted in conceptual engineering of 25 MW plant in support of response to RFP by Hawaiian Electric. The plant is to be installed on the island of Hawaii using a water-dominated resource. Occidental Geothermal, Incorporated OXY Geothermal Plant #1 Performed the following work supporting preliminary engineering and licensing efforts for an 80 MW geothermal power plant: development of economic evaluation factors, turbine cycle performance evaluation, condenser cooling tower optimization, and review of major equipment vendor bids. Public Service Company of Colorado Southeast Project Performed the following for a 500 MW coal-fired power plant: optimization of feedwater pipe size, evaluation of auxiliary steam costs, and assisted project as economic consultant. Montana Power Company Resource 89 Project Coordinated heat balance and studies group work supporting preliminary engineering and licensing efforts for 330 MW coal-fired power plant. This effort included the development of economic evaluation factors for use in performance evaluations, a study of alternative cooling systems, optimization of circulating water system components, development of preliminary heat balances, projectization of reference fossil power plant studies, and calculation of heat rates required for size optimization study. Sacramento Municipal Utility District SMUDGEO #1 Geothermal Power Plant Conducted the following investigations for a 72 MW geothermal power plant: economic evaluation factors for performance analyses, heat balance calculations, optimization of plant heat rejection system, performance evaluations of condenser tube cleaning equipment, methods of non-condensible gas removal from condenser and cooling tower evaporation rates. Also assisted in the evaluation of the turbine generator bids. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Company Chalmette Fuel Conversion Project Coordinated heat balance work including coal evaluation and heat balance development. ROBERT E. TUCKER Sierra Pacific Power Company/Idaho Power Company North Valmy Station Unit 2 Coordinated heat balance efforts for the 267 MW coal-fired power plant including: turbine blowout pipe sizing, safety valve vent line sizing, superheater and turbine bypass performance considerations, feedwater heater drain line sizing, and final heat balance diagrams. El Paso Electric Company Results Engineering Training Program Lectured on power plant thermodynamics and methods of performance evaluation of existing generating facilities including methods of heat balance calculations. Reference Fossil Power Plant Project Economic evaluations of circulating water systems alternatives in conjunction with the Number of Ends Study for the 300-450 MW Reference Fossil Power Plant. In-House Computer Program Development Computer graphics programming for coal evaluation program and heat balance program diagrams. TRI-STATE UNIVERSITY Angola, Indiana As Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Tri-State University, Angola, Indiana, served as a full-time faculty member teaching in the areas of thermodynamics, power plants, and machine design. PURDUE UNIVERSITY West Lafayette, Indiana As Teaching Assistant and Research Assistant, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, was responsible for instruction in thermodynamics and heat transfer, and research in cogeneration power plant analysis. J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Lafayette, Indiana As Field Mechanical Engineer, J. A. Jones Construction Company, Charlotte, North Carolina; and Construction Manager for A.E. Staley Corn Processing Plant, Lafayette, Indiana, was responsible for field coordination of all mechanical work in process areas, including equipment setting and process and utility piping. Also assisted in plant startup. STONE & WEBSTER a ROBERT E. TUCKER BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Houston, Texas As Assistant Mechanical Engineer, responsible for the design of the Blue Hills Nuclear Power Plant for Gulf States Utilities. Responsible for computer programming and calculation, including programs to analyze weather bureau information, calculate reactor decay heat, and size piping and compute pressure drop. As Assistant Mechanical Engineer, responsible for system design, supporting calculations, and responses to AEC questions on Safety Analysis Report. As Assistant Mechanical Engineer, responsible for writing portions of Preliminary Safety Analysis Report and supporting calculations. As Assistant Field Engineer, responsible for concrete work and the electrical subcontractor on the Texaco Refinery Expansion. As Assistant Engineer, Startup Group, Bechtel Corporation, San Francisco, California, responsible for developing standard system descriptions for generic fossil plant, and for compiling Operating Problems Manual. EDWIN J. JOHNSON LEAD ELECTRICAL/TRANSMISSION ENGINEER EDUCATION University of Utah - M.S. in Engineering Administration Duke University - B.S. in Electrical Engineering TRAINING Lehigh University - Graduate courses in Business University of Colorado - Graduate courses in Electrical Engineering Engineer's Club of Philadelphia - selected Power Distribution courses Air Command and Staff College (USAF): Squadron Officers School General Electric Company: Optimized Generation Planning Workshop Various Stone & Webster Continuing Education courses LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Colorado, Pennsylvania, California PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers - Member Toastmasters International - Member EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Johnson is an Electrical Engineer with over sixteen (16) years of experience in power plant design, communications, electronics, and energy economic studies. He has been a Lead Electrical Engineer with Stone & Webster and has performed work on three nuclear power plant projects involving determination of safety-related control devices, a major revision of a Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), and an Emergency Response Facility design. Prior to this, Mr. Johnson was assigned to Stone & Webster Management Consultants serving as a Consultant to several western utilities on load management feasibility studies and power loss allocations for cost of service studies. Prior to joining Stone & Webster, Mr. Johnson was with Gilbert/Commonwealth, also in successive positions of Management Engineer and Consultant for private utilities and government agencies. He was a major contributor to two large load management studies for the Department of Energy that evaluated four utilities in the East and mid-West. Radio, power line carrier, hybrid, and telephone systems were analyzed. Mr. Johnson was the Lead Electrical Engineer in several precipitator additions, balanced draft conversions, and relay coordination studies in western Pennsylvania. He was extensively involved for three years in both the electrical and control design of Brandon Shores Power Station (oil/coal-fired). STONE & WEBSTER A EDWIN J. JOHNSON EXPERIENCE SUMMARY (Continued) Earlier, Mr. Johnson served on active duty in the United States Air Force, engaged as an Electronics and Project Engineer in the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Testing Program (Titan Il, Minuteman II & III). He is currently a Major in the Colorado Air National Guard, serving as chief of radar evaluation in the 154th Tactical Control Group. EDWIN J. JOHNSON DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado Northern States Power Company Black Dog Unit 2 As a Support Electrical Engineer, assisting in the engineering and design of various systems for the retrofit of an existing coal fired boiler to fluidized bed combustion, and upgrade of the turbine generation. Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station As Lead Electrical Engineer, designed a DC motor starter installation to be in conformance with environmental qualification and fire protection standards (10CFR50.49 & Appendix R). Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Power Station As Support Engineer, assisted in the response to Human Engineering Discrepancies (HED) found in the:Control Room Design Review. Suggested revisions in control instrumentation were proposed for over 274 HED's after review of control board drawings and vendor interviews. lowa Electric Light and Power Company Duane Arnold Energy Center As Lead Electrical Engineer at the client's main office, responsible for the design and implementation of the Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Upgrade at DAEC to be in compliance with post-TMI standards imposed in NUREG 0737 Supplement 1. Worked with another sub-contractor to categorize plant instrumentation per RG 1.97 and to justify deviations. This upgrade was part of the Emergency Response Facility Project, a $30 million, 6-year effort. Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station As Lead Electrical Engineer, designed the electrical portion of the Radiation Effluent Monitor installation in accordance with NUREG 0737. The design involved KAMAN Sciences monitors, microprocessors, and indicators. Northern States Power Company Prairie Island Nuclear Station As a Support Engineer, conducted short circuit, relay coordination, and load flow studies to provide data for switchgear and relay specifications. Load flow study utilized an EPRI/Stone & Webster Fortran program. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ad As Support Engineer, contributed to the wiring design of the plant computer Gab inevees=* EDWIN J. JOHNSON City of Vidalia, Mississippi Hydro Proposal As Support Engineer, prepared specifications in medium voltage switchgear, station batteries, cathodic protection for a low head hydro project utilizing French turbine/generators. Sacramento Municipal Utility District Rancho Seco Nuclear Power Station As Lead Electrical Engineer, participated in major revision of the Final Safety Analysis Report for this nuclear power station. Incorporated changes in electrical, |1&C, reactor, reactor coolant, safety features, and auxiliary systems. Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Power Station As Electrical Engineer, conducted determination of safety-related status of all electrical control devises at this nuclear power station. Drawing of all control panels were investigated and revised. STONE & WEBSTER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. Denver, Colorado Southwestern Electric Service Company Jacksonville, Texas Montana-Dakota Utilities Bismarck, North Dakota As Consultant, performed load management feasibility studies to limit the demand of residential customers by direct control using constraints of customer acceptance, existing controllable loads, fue! mix, and demand vs. capacity forecasts. Determined cost/benefits of utilizing radio, power line carrier, telephone, or hybrid control systems for this purpose. Colorado Springs Department of Utilities Colorado Springs, Colorado Utah Power & Light Company Salt Lake City, Utah As Consultant, conducted loss studies at the distribution level of the utility grid, using allocation factors developed from a survey of system impedance data and variations in load. Results were utilized in a subsequent rate design. EDWIN J. JOHNSON El Paso Electric Company El Paso, Texas As Consultant, participated in an interconnection study to determine the optimum plan for adding capacity. Options considered were coal, lignite, gas, nuclear, or purchased power. Minnesota Power & Light Company Minneapolis, Minnesota As Consultant, prepared an economic study for a proposed 20-year lignite mine development to serve a mine-mouth power plant. Proprietary rate-of-return computer programs on coal mine capital costs were used as a basis for this study, plus substantial assistance from the North American Coal Consultants. Electrical Power Research Institute Palo Alto, California As Consultant, conducted Value-of-Research studies for selected EPRI projects to establish derived benefits. A selected sampling of utility firms was chosen for monitoring applications which included UHF transmission line noise, nuclear fuel models, distribution automation tests, and use of residual oil in combination cycle combustion turbines. GILBERT/COMMONWEALTH Reading, Pennsylvania United States Department of Energy Washington, D.C. As Senior Engineer, participated in a project assessing the potential of emerging technologies to determine the raw material costs of solvent refined coal (SRC) and fluidized bed reactors. The initial and future power requirements for each process was also calculated. In a companion study, the cost effects of the "Clean Air Act of 1977" on SRC development were evaluated. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Brandon Shores Power Plant - Oil-Fired, 2 Units, 600 MW As Electrical Engineer, held responsible charge of the staff of engineers and designers assigned to develop electrical and control features for the station service auxiliary systems, including air and gas draft, ash handling, boiler, circulating water, condensate, feedwater, turbine generator, precipitator, diesel generator, auxiliary steam, transformer protection, water treatment, soot blowing, HVAC, substation interphase, switchgear, and motor control centers. STONE & WEBSTER A EDWIN J. JOHNSON Pennsylvania Electric Company Connemaugh Steam Power Station, Coal-Fired, 1800 MW Front Street Station, Coal-Fired, 118 MW As Lead Electrical Engineer, participated in the design of equipment and the electrical installation of electrostatic precipitators at these existing plants. Developed one-line diagrams, control circuits, prepared specifications and analyzed bids on switchgear, transformers, motors, cables, and control devices. Pennsylvania Electric Company Keystone Power Plant, Coal-Fired, 2 Units, 800 MW Connemaugh Power Plant, Coal-Fired, 2 Units, 900 MW Seward Power Plant, Coal-Fired, 280 MW Front Street Power Plant, Coal-Fired, 118 MW Shawville Power Plant, Coal-Fired, 640 MW Warren Power Plant, Coal-Fired, 53 MW As Electrical Engineer, conducted load and short circuit studies from which time/current characteristics were established for all circuit and machine protection. Relay settings were determined to coordinate the operation of all protective devices. COLORADO AIR NATIONAL GUARD - BUCKLEY FIELD Aurora, Colorado 154th Tactical Control Group As Officer in charge of Radar Evaluation, evaluate performance of TPS-43E tactical radars in controlling F-4 and A-7 fighter aircraft on a continuing basis at nine national guard units in four states. PENNSYLVANIA AIR NATIONAL GUARD Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania 211th Electronics Installation Squadron As Officer in charge of Engineering, coordinated design and material ordering of ground communication systems including telephone, HF, VHF, and UHF radio for military installations. EDWIN J. JOHNSON UNITED STATES AIR FORCE - HILL AFB Ogden, Utah Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Flight Analysis As Project Engineer, prepared test reports on Titan and Minuteman Missiles launched by the Strategic Air Command (SAC). Coordinated data from all engineering disciplines in analyzing guidance, propulsion, instrumentation, and targeting systems. Selected by SAC to develop the format for the Minuteman II] Test Program. Missile Telemetry & Radar Systems As Electronics Engineer, analyzed system performance in S-band telemetry and C-band radar to isolate malfunctions and develop engineering change proposals directed at equipment suppliers. STONE & WEBSTER A MICHAEL R. MASON LEAD CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EDUCATION Oregon State University - B.S. in Civil Engineering TRAINING Structural Engineer License Review - California State University at Long Beach Cold Regions Engineering - University of Washington, University of Fairbanks Nuclear Reactor Physics and Energy Fundamentals - Colorado State University Advanced Theory of Structural Vibrations - Stearns-Roger, Inc. Advanced Civil, Structural, Engineering and Engineering Math courses California State University at L.A. Certified course in Earthquake Engineering - University of California Miscellaneous short courses in steel design for buildings (AISC), hydrology (ITTE), traffic safety (ITTE), masonry quality control (MIA), and concrete technology (USD!) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers — Fellow (Local and National) LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Colorado, Alaska, California, Oregon, Washington EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Mason has eighteen (18) years of experience in the design and engineering of power plants, public works projects, and heavy industrial plant facilities. His work in these fields has allowed him to direct and supervise the civil structural and architectural design efforts for a variety of projects. In addition, he has been responsible for: writing and preparing portions of a variety of proposals; preparing scopes of work, schedules and manpower requirements; making special studies; field and site investigations and inspections, shop inspections and quality control witnessing; designing, design supervising; preparing extensive specifications; estimating; and contract administrating. He has also been involved in writing technical guidelines and structural master specifications for his department. Mr. Mason' work has allowed him to make frequent and varied contact with clients, vendors and in some cases, state, local and federal agencies. His contacts with these various entities has been both foreign and domestic and has covered diverse areas, such as project review meetings with clients, licensing hearings and workshops and _ technical meetings. His work in a variety of public and heavy industrial areas has allowed him to build a range of experience and feasibility with new technique new equipment and innovative projects. He has also extensively involved himself in coordinating his own work teams efforts with those of other discipline, there by gaining insight and appreciation into the needs and problems of other disciplines. His most recent work has centered around the design of geothermal plants, photovoltaic installations, resource recovery facilities, fossil plant conversions and cogeneration plants. His power experience, as will be noted, covers geothermal, waste recovery, cogeneration, solar, hydro, fossil and nuclear projects. STONE & WEBSTER A MICHAEL R. MASON DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado Sacramento Municipal Utility District SMUD PV3 As Lead Structural Engineer, in responsible charge of all civil, structural, and architectural work for a 5MW photovoltaic solar power facility for Sacramento Municipal Utility District and located near their Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Facility. As the project was partially funded by the Department of Energy, was also responsible for certain research and optimization of new technology, technical studies and associated reports. Public Utility District of Chelan County, Washington Rocky Reach and Rock Island Hydroelectric Projects As Lead Structural Engineer, in charge of design of shoring for both facilities: Rocky Reach, shoring design of weak areas for transporting 120-ton transformer across dam deck; and Rock Island in responsible change of design of shoring, beam and column repair, and bearing replacement for north approach ramp abatement. Northern States Power Company : Ramsey/Washington County Waste Track Resource Recovery Facility As Structural Design Engineer and Supervisor, in responsible charge of preliminary design of track recovery facilities shredding and packaging equipment support framing and platforms, material quantity estimate, structural steel specification. In charge of design of enclosure buildings foundation design. Geothermal Resources International, Inc. Aidlin Geothermal Plant No. 1 As Lead Structural Engineer, in responsible charge of all civil, structural, and architectural work for this 12.5 MW geothermal project. This was a turn key project designed to start operation in 18 months. Responsible for site selection, site development and building, foundation, structure and substructure design. Direct involvement in design effort as well as responsible for developing design criteria, supervision, contract specifications, contract administration and assistance to client in obtaining permits. Experience with above UBC Zone 4 seismic conditions. Garb Oil Resource Recovery Facility As Lead Structural Engineer, in responsible charge of developing and providing all civil, structural, and architectural studies to assess the feasibility of designing and constructing a resource recovery facility capable of producing up to 30 MW of generated electricity from shredded tires as a fuel. The work included arranging the plant facilities, laying out the warehouse, maintenance, and office complexes with the assistance of the Division Architect. Prepared full material-take-off's of all civil, structural, and architectural work. Prepared mini specifications of pre-engineered buildings for client pricing. MICHAEL R. MASON Arizona Public Service Company Four Corners Steam Electric Station As Lead Structural Engineer, was responsible for complete review of Arizona Public Service Company's Four Corners Steam Electric Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 in order to develop up-to-date plant civil and structural system descriptions. The three units, originally constructed in the 1960s, had expanded with major additions and new systems such as scrubbers, special water treatment facilities, etc. and had many changes made. Responsibility was to write thorough system descriptions describing the site and the miriad of large structures and varied large and small buildings and systems so that they could be used for plant operation training and tracing of information for design and plant operations. Morgan Guarantee and Trust Vulcan Geothermal Plant As Lead Structural Engineer, was part of a special team whose task was to review the feasibility of a potential 30 MW geothermal steam generating plant using brine, located near Niland, California. This facility was being designed by others. Each team members’ responsibility was to assess and identify engineering efforts in his own field of expertise and flag potential problems prior to Morgan becoming financially involved in the project. This was a very short term, rapid turn around project. Natomas Energy Company Davies Project As Lead Structural Engineer, in responsible charge of developing and providing all civil, structural, and architectural engineering efforts to prepare a permit application for Lake County, California, for a 25 MW geothermal dry steam power plant being proposed in Northern California. Responsible for developing plant site layout, cut and fill earthwork calculations, road and plant profiles, and plant layout; coordinating preparation of architectural rendering; and preliminary planning of structural foundations and building design. Extensive writing of civil, structural, and architectural design criteria and civil and structural permit information for this proposed plant located in a publicly sensitive area of California and in an above UBC Zone 4 seismic zone. STONE & WEBSTER Aa MICHAEL R. MASON Occidental Geothermal, Inc. Oxy Geothermal Plant No. 1 As Lead Structural Engineer, in responsible charge of all civil, structural, and architectural work for the project. Responsible for coordinating all structural, civil and architectural efforts with all interfacing disciplines. Supervised planning, layout and design of total plant facilities in steel, concrete, architecture and civil areas. Active involvement in and direction of engineering decisions, design and inspections of main power plant, plant warehouse and office complex, pre-engineered buildings, and auxiliary systems and project related issues. Extensive writing of specifications and direction of others writing specifications and administration of contracts. Experience with heavy seismic zone requirements and design of structures for seismic activities at and above UBC Zone 4 requirements. Direct coordination of all design efforts with related construction efforts in field. Extensive direct contact with client, agencies, vendors and contractors. Involved in development of geothermal steam gatherings system and responsible for rock muffler vent station design. Mitigation with public agencies required in permit issuance. Washington Public Power Supply System Hanford Generating Plant Registered Professional Engineer for the project and the Structural Division Reviewer for all structural design facets of this project, which consisted of the design of and specification for replacing existing outfall line diffusers for the circulating water system with new modified diffusers to be installed on an existing outfall line in the Columbia River. Alaska Power Authority Bristol Bay Regional Power Feasibility Study As Lead Structural Engineer, in responsible charge of all civil and structural engineering aspects of a feasibility study for power generation in the Bristol Bay Region of Alaska. This study included surveys for.all types of power production, including hydro, wind, fossil, and diesel power. Responsible for reviewing all civil and structural aspects of reports and studies made and acting in an advisory capacity for the first phase of the feasibility study. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Coal Conversion Study As Lead Structural Engineer, responsible for all structural, civil and architectural requirements for the study. Prepared preliminary layouts and plans, and quantity and cost estimates for modifications to existing aluminum plant in Chalmette, Louisiana. Work included basic design of shore facilities such as gas turbine modifications, coal handling and storage facilities, and development, layout, and basic design of off shore docking, coal unloading, and coal conveying facilities along the Mississippi River. Intimately involved in report writing and in preparation of final study report. MICHAEL R. MASON Sacramento Municipal Utility District SMUDGEO # 1 As Engineer/Support Engineer, responsible for support activities in assistance to Lead Structural Engineer, in areas of design and supervision. Responsible for design of foundations and superstructures for main turbine building and other facilities. Developed specifications for and worked with the Division Architect to provide a pre-engineered plant office facility. Responsible for preparation of site and civil/structural construction specifications and assisted in preparation and coordination of design criteria. Experience with heavy seismic zone requirements and design of structures for seismic activities at and above UBC Zone 4 requirements. Mitigation with public agencies involved in permit issuance for construction. KAISER ENGINEERING Denver, Colorado As Senior Structural Design Engineer, responsible for Structural design and supervision of design for various portions of cement plant facilities. Specifically worked on design of heavy caisson supported foundations for cement plant precipitator addition in St. Louis, Missouri., modifications to cement silo roof systems for intervents for a midwest cement plant, and design of gravel rock crushing and screening systems for a gold mine operation in northern Colorado. RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY Portland, Oregon As Senior Design Engineer, responsible for pulp and paper mill design. In charge of all structural planning, direction, design and supervision of design modifications at Boise Cascade's Pulp and Paper Mill located in Walula, Washington. Specifically in charge of work for that plant's Lime Kiln Plant, Liquor Making Plant and Utility Bridge Systems. This work included structural design of supports for a12' diameter x 350' lime kiln, the end feed buildings and appurtenances; design of the liquor making area covering large and small diameter tank foundations, platforming and support structures; design of clarifier, sludge and caustic tank systems; design of venturi scrubber foundations and duct and platform framing; and design of extensive multilevel utility bridges. Extensive use of and familiarity with UBC and seismic codes. STONE & WEBSTER A MICHAEL R. MASON STEARNS-ROGER, INC. Denver, Colorado Department of Energy - Nuclear Waste Treatment Facility Conceptual Design As Structural Design Supervisor, Power Division, responsible for conceptual layout, planning and design of a D.O.E. Nuclear Waste Treatment Facility Conceptual Study. In charge of structural and architectural conceptual and preliminary design of above ground, high and low level radiation receiving and processing buildings, and other support facilities. This included the full industrial arrangements, architectural planning, site services and security systems for these facilities. Work also included the preliminary structural design of the above ground, low level waste and high level radiation waste handling facilities, rail handling facilities, shop facilities, fire and life safety, and the involvement in security and administration facilities. Each segment of the study required a complete technical description, a materials estimate, a cost estimate and a full written report keyed into the federal nuclear regulations and like requirements. Utah Power & Light Company 400 MW, Coal-Fired Plant As Project Civil Engineer and Structural Design Supervisor, in responsible charge of all structural steel, concrete, civil and architectural design on second 400 MW unit and follow-up design on first 400 MW unit. Directed, coordinated and supervised all planning, studies and design for main power plant, wet SO. scrubber system, major water treatment plant and appurtenant facilities. As Design Engineer of structural steel for above power plant's second unit, involved in full concept design, layout, planning, and design of actual framing for plant. CITY OF LOS ANGELES Los Angeles, California Bureau of Public Works Bridge and Structural Design Division As a Senior Civil Engineering Assistant in the Bureau's Bridge and Structural Design Division for four years, was responsible for a variety of jobs which included the structural planning, design, and drafting of bridges, retaining walls, partial demolition and restoration of older buildings, storm sewers, large open channel structures, etc. In addition, a portion of the time was spent in the checking squad where in-house designs, designs from other divisions, and designs from private firms were checked for civil and structural adequacy. Acted as the editor of the Bridge Design Manual. Wrote technical articles and specifications and updated standards. MICHAEL R. MASON Utilities and Estimating Division As a Civil Engineering Assistant in the Bureau's Utilities and Estimating Division, was responsible for preparing the Engineer's Quantity and Cost Estimates for a variety of city projects for bid comparison and City Council use. The range of work covered such items as street improvements, retaining walls, street lighting, bridge works and sewer and storm drain projects. During this time an appreciation of the complexities and workings of a major city organization was gained and an understanding of cost estimating was built. STONE & WEBSTER A MICHAEL L. BARNINGHAM PERMITTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER EDUCATION Michigan State University - B.S. in Urban Planning EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Barningham has over fourteen (14) years of professional environmental and planning experience. Currently as Senior Environmental Planner, he is responsible for the development of land use and socioeconomic components of Stone & Webster engineering assignments. He also serves as Lead Environmental Scientist on selected projects, coordinating the efforts of all environmental personnel assigned to a project. Since joining Stone & Webster, Mr. Barningham has participated in a large water development project in Wyoming and assisted in the development of a FERC application for relicensing of an existing hydroelectric facility in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. He has also provided permitting support on a major hydroelectric project in Alaska. Prior to joining Stone & Webster, Mr. Barningham was employed for over 13 years with Gilbert/Commonwealth, where he held the positions of Associate Community Planner, Project Planner, Project Manager, and Principal Project Manager. Mr. Barningham also served as Office Manager for the company's Rocky Mountain Regional Office in Englewood, Colorado. His experience with Gilbert/Commonwealth included environmental impact assessments and mitigation planning, route and site selection studies, environmental report preparation, permitting, expert testimony, public participation programs, and community planning. PUBLICATIONS " Working Within the Environmental Regulatory Process", Co-author with Steven A. Ott. Presented at American Society of Civil Engineers Convention, Boston, Massachusetts, April 1979. STONE & WEBSTER A MICHAEL L. BARNINGHAM DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado Senior Environmental Planner Wyoming Water Development Commission Little Snake River Water Management Project - Phase | Responsible for the coordination of environmental input, including ElS/permitting support, for a proposed water development project in south central Wyoming. Upper Peninsula Power Company Bond Falls/Victoria Dam FERC Relicense Application Responsible for the preparation of Land Management and Aesthetics, Recreational Resources, and Historical and Archaeological Resources sections of Exhibit E of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission application to relicense an existing hydroelectric facility in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Alaska Power Authority Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project Responsible for the identification of permits, leases and other approvals required for a proposed hydroelectric project on the Kenai Peninsula of Alaska. Also prepared v.s. Army Corps of Engineers 404/Section 10 permit application, and Alaska ONR Water Right and permit to construct or modify a dam application. GILBERT/COMMONWEALTH Denver, Colorado and Jackson, Michigan Manager, Rocky Mountain Regional Office Responsible for overall office administration, supervision of division personnel assigned to office, and marketing of environmental services. Also served as Project Manager for routing and environmental services on Black Hills Power and Light's Wyodak-Hot Springs 230 kV Transmission Line. Coordinated visual, biological, and cultural resource studies on the proposed IPP-Gonder 230 kV and IPP - Mona 345 kV Transmission Lines for Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power. Principal Project Manager Responsible for the management and administration of large multidisciplinary routing and/or environmental studies for the following electric transmission line projects: o Western Area Power Administration (Colorado) Craig-Rifle 230 to 345 kV Transmission Line Uprate o Western Area Power Administration (South Dakota) Brookings-White 230 kV Transmission Line MICHAEL L. BARNINGHAM o Western Area Power Administration (Colorado) Sterling—Holyoke 69 kV Transmission Line o Western Area Power Administration (Colorado) Beaver Creek-Bijou Creek 115 kV Transmission Line o Alaska Power Authority (Alaska) Anchorage-Fairbanks Transmission Intertie o Southwestern Power Administration (Arkansas) Jonesboro-Hergett 161 kV Transmission Line Also coordinated environmental planning input to the licensing phase of the proposed Erie Nuclear Power Plant and associated transmission lines for the Ohio Edison Company (project cancelled). Assisted in the organization of, and participated in, 15 public meetings. Project Manager Responsible for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement on a major crude oil and production pipeline in Minnesota for Williams Pipeline Company. Also coordinated routing and environmental input to the following transmission line projects: o Nebraska Public Power District (Nebraska) NPPD 345 kV Transmission Project (Sidney-Ogallala, Ogallala~Gerald Gentleman, Gerald Gentlemen-Sweetwater, Sweetwater-Riverdale, Gerald Gentleman-Northwest McCook) o Cooperative Power Assn./United Power Assn. (Minnesota) CU + 400 kV d.c. Transmission Project o Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company (Ohio) West End-Terminal 345 kV Transmission Line o Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) Manitoba-Twin Cities 500 kV Interconnection o Basin Electric Power Cooperative (Wyoming and South Dakota) Wheatland-Sioux Falls + 400 kV d.c. Transmission Line o Black Hills Power and Light Company (Wyoming and South Dakota) Wyodak-Spearfish-Rapid City 230 kV Transmission Line Participated in over ten weeks of public meetings and workshops. Expert witness before the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council on transmission corridor/route selection and anticipated environmental effects. STONE & WEBSTER a MICHAEL L. BARNINGHAM Project Planner Analyzed land use and demographic data, zoning ordinances and comprehensive plans, and developed necessary input to environmental reports for the following projects: o Potomac Electric Power Company (Maryland) Mt. Airy-Brighton, Burches Hill, Chalk Pt., Burches Hill, Possum Pt. 500 kV Transmission Lines o The Detroit Edison Company (Michigan) Majestic-Sprague Creek 765 kV Transmission Line o Consumers Power Company and Indiana and Michigan Electric Company (Michigan and Indiana) Argenta-Elkhart 345 kV Transmission Line o The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (Ohio) Avon-Harding 345 kV Transmission Line Associate Community Planner Responsible for mapping and assessment of land use, zoning, economic and general environmental data for land use studies and area wide sewer and water plans in Chippewa and Clinton Counties, Michigan. WALTER G. BAGLEY, JR. LOCAL CONSULTANT EDUCATION University of Colorado - B.S. in Mechanical Engineering TRAINING USNR Midshipmen's School, Columbia University Received commission as Ensign USNR Structural Engineering through correspondence courses, ICS, Scranton, Pennsylvania. Attended training courses while in the U.S. Army that included computer programming, labor relations, personnel management and technical seminars related to mechanical design. Attended management seminars conducted by National Rural Electric Cooperative Association. EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Bagley, a long-time Alaska resident, has been called upon for his technical expertise by several Alaska concerns including the Alaska Power Authority, and Alaska Gas and Service Company. Mr. Bagley, having served on the Board of Directors for a local REA, is keenly aware of the issues facing the electrical generating industry in Alaska. He has had extensive experience in all apsects of mechanical engineering and electrical generating facilities with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. STONE & WEBSTER A WALTER G. BAGLEY, JR. DETAILED EXPERIENCE Retired Civil Service Employee Since retirement, Mr. Bagley has worked as an engineer to balance heating systems in two large schools, and performed mechanical and electrical inspection for the North Slope Borough at six recently completed telephone exchange facilities at remote villages. He performed a feasibility study for Alaska Gas and Service Co. on possible use of LNG in Golden Valley Electric Association's North Pole gas turbine power plant, and provided comments to Alaska Power Authority on Anchorage-Fairbanks interconnection feasibility study by Commonwealth Association, Inc. at Jackson, Michigan. Director, Chugach Electric Association Mr. Bagley served as one of seven Directors for Chugach Electric Association (CEA). The position was a non-paying elective office involving an average of some four hours per week. The position also required attendance at meetings in other locations of Alaska. and various cities in the contiguous 48 states. CEA is the largest electric utility in the State of Alaska serving some 45,000 meters. Because of his engineering background, he was called upon to assist and advise in the acquisition of major power generation equipment and negotiation of major construction contracts. He served as President of CEA from 1970 to 1972 and as Secretary from 1972 until he resigned in August 1980. It was necessary for him to resign in compliance with the co-op's bylaws when he moved away from CEA's Anchorage service area. ‘ Assistant Director of Facilities Engineering Acted as the Assistant DFAE and was responsible for all engineering activities in the 172nd Infantry Brigade, Alaska, including maintenance and repair of real property facilities, operation of utilities plants and systems, construction and real estate management. Maintained subordinate facilities engineer elements at Forts Wainwright and Greely. Supervised total work force of some 850 employees. Industrial Engineer Acted as Assistant Chief of Installation Division on Command R & U activities such as work management, project programming, R & U equipment and supply, resources management, manpower surveys and cost reduction. Command budget for R & U activities exceeded $29,000,000. Supervisory General Engineer Served as Chief Utilities Branch of Installation Division, USARAL Engineer Office. Provided technical staff supervision for command over electrical, mechanical, sanitary and heat and power phases of R & U activities. Supervised mechanical, electrical and sanitary engineers. WALTER G. BAGLEY, JR. Mechanical Engineer Served as Mechanical Engineer in Utilities Branch of Installation Division, USARAL Engineer Office. Provided technical staff supervision of mechanical engineer aspects of command R & U activities to include heat and power plants, steam distribution systems, heat and vent, refrigeration and air conditioning. Utility plants include four large steam heat and power plants, one nuclear power plant and numerous diesel power plants. Power Plant General Foreman Served as Foreman in charge of operation and maintenance of Ft. Richardson heat and power generating facilities, exercising supervision of operators mechanics, electricians and technicians. Mechanical Engineer Served as Mechanica! Engineer in mechanical section, Maintenance Division DCS, Inst., AAC. Provided staff surveillance and supervision for command on heating and ventilating equipment. Shift Foreman Supervised operating shift in the maintenance and operation of the Fort Richardson heat and power plant. : Field Engineer In charge of field engineering for mechanical contractor during construction of the Fort Richardson heat and power plant. Mechanical Engineer Worked ‘as Mechanical Engineer in design of steam distribution systems, steam heating plants and diesel power plants. Participated in design of steam heat and power plants. Made designs and drawings for improvements to operation in open pit mining operation. Involved in making addition to power plant to include installation of two 800 psi boilers and one 10,000 kW steam turbine. Wrote operating instructions for all power plant equipment and electric locomotive mine hauling system. STONE & WEBSTER A WALTER G. BAGLEY, JR. Test Engineer Conducted tests on open hearth and other heating furnaces in steel mill to improve combustion efficiency. Chief Engineer In charge of Engineer Division supervising 28 enlisted men on an LST. JOE M. MISSEL CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST EDUCATION University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering Grays Harbor College - Associate Degree Arctic Regions Engineering LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Registered Professional Engineer - Colorado, Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon, and California PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers HONORS AND AWARDS National Athletic Honor Society Tau Beta Pi, Engineering Honorary Society PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Construction of Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project ASCE Structural Conference, Baltimore, 1972 Engineering Foundation Conference, New Hampshire, 1974 American Power Conference, Chicago, 1975 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Missel has had thirty-one years of progressively responsible experience which includes engineering, estimating, scheduling, design and contract management, and construction supervision of various types of dams, tunnels, conventional and pumped storage hydroelectric projects, including various assignments on fossil, nuclear, and geothermal power plants. Mr. Missel recently completed his assignment on Occidental Geothermal Project located at Middletown, California as the Senior Construction Site Representative and was responsible for the management of construction of a complete and operating geothermal plant with two units rated at 48 MW each. Mr. Missel completed an assignment, as a Technical Consultant for Portland General Electric on the Technical Support Center for the Trojan Nuclear Plant. STONE & WEBSTER A JOE M. MISSEL EXPERIENCE SUMMARY (Continued) Mr. Missel has served as a Construction Specialist in our Denver Operations Center. He served as Construction Specialist on the Rock Island Project for the Public Utility District No. 1, Chelan County, Washington, the Montezuma Pumped Storage Project, the Alchesay Pumped Storage Project and Site Selection Study for the Salt River Project, Phoenix, Arizona. He supervised reconditioning of the flooded Safe Harbor Hydroelectric Power Plant in Lancaster, Pa. including corrective and erection work on the precipitator and ash handling facility for the Kirk Fossil Plant in Lead, So. Dakota. Prior to these assignments, he served as Superintendent of Construction on the Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project for Northeast Utilities, which is a 1000 MW plant with 3-1/2 miles of tunnels and an underground power station housing the four 250 MW reversible pump/turbines. Mr. Missel has also served as Assistant Superintendent of Construction on the Cabin Creek Pumped Storage Project for Public Service Company of Colorado. He has had experience in estimating and quantity surveys, design, scheduling, contract management and construction supervision of thin arch concrete, concrete gravity, rock fill and earth dams; tunnels; powerhouses; freeways; and docks and wharfs. He was the Construction Design Engineer on the Pelton Project at Madras, Oregon, and Trinity River Project in Lewiston, California. He has been Structural Superintendent, Planning Engineer and Site Superintendent on various concrete dams, powerhouses and tunnels at Pierre, South Dakota, and Oroville, California. For two and one-half years, he was Construction Design Engineer and Contracts Material Manager on the Mangla Dam in West Pakistan. His extensive experience on concrete, earthwork and underground excavation and varied work on fossil and nuclear projects has made him invaluable in the construction field. JOE M. MISSEL DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado Performing various tasks for Construction and Marketing Management. City of Klamath Falls Salt Caves Project As Construction Specialist responsible for review on conceptual designs, construction methods, cost estimates and development of a project construction schedule. Occidental Geothermal Plant #1 Middletown, California Served as the Senior Construction Site Representative managing the construction of a two unit geothermal power plant. Portland General Electric Company Portland, Oregon Served as the Technical Consultant on the construction and installation of equipment on the Technical Support Center for the Trojan Nuclear Plant. Public Service Company of New Mexico Participated in studies of pumped storage project including layout of project relative to construction, estimating, planning and scheduling of construction and access roads and construction input to various engineering studies. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Assists Marketing and Engineering on numerous power plant studies including planning, estimating and scheduling between field assignments. Safe Harbor Water Power Co. Supervised reconditioning of the flooded Safe Harbor hydroelectric power plant in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Kirk Power Plant Supervised precipitator ductwork installation and erection of ash handling building for the Kirk Fossil Power Plant in Lead, South Dakota. Salt River Project South Consolidated Canal Project Involved in the planning, scheduling, estimating and construction of a small hydroelectric project utilizing a horizontal tube type unit located between two irrigation canals. STONE & WEBSTER A JOE M. MISSEL Alchesay Pumped Storage Project Participated in studies of site selection, general layout of project relative to construction, scheduling of construction, layout of access roads and construction input to engineering. Pumped Storage Site Selection Study Assisted in study of various sites in Arizona suitable for a pumped storage project. Study of access, transportation, available manpower, sequence of construction, and supplied input to socioeconomic considerations on surrounding communities. Montezuma Pumped Storage Project Participated in site selection and economic feasibility studies as representative of the Construction Department for the Montezuma Project; a 1000 MW underground pumped storage project located south of Phoenix, Arizona. Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County, Washington Rock Island Hydroelectric Project Construction Specialist for the installation of eight bulb type generating units in a new powerhouse for this existing project on the Columbia River. Assisted in engineering studies. Northeast Utilities Service Company Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project Supervised completion of construction of Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project. Was in charge of 58 non-manual and approximately 350 manual personnel in the erection of the pump/turbine and all mechanical and electrical installations. Special assignment in Boston Office working on specifications for Stage Il work on Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project. Served as Superintendent for construction management of earthwork, tunneling and shaft excavation. Supervised layout of all field construction and construction management for construction of cofferdams, access roads, clearing and excavation. Public Service Company of Colorado Cabin Creek Pumped Storage Project Supervised all field work on this 330 MW pumped storage project in Georgetown, Colorado, which at the time of completion was the world's highest head pumped storage project, with a static head of 1226 ft. Assisted in engineering studies. Supervised remedial work on pipe supports and installation of post-tensioned anchors in the powerhouse and penstock thrust block. JOE M. MISSEL GUY F. ATKINSON COMPANY Mangla Dam Contractors Mangla, West Pakistan As Construction Design Engineer, designed new heavy duty wharf, designed and supervised construction of family housing, roads, shops and offices at project site. Managed procurement, storage and issuing of all contract materials. Oroville - Wyandott Project California As Planning Engineer, Site Superintendent, planned, scheduled and supervised construction of two concrete arch dams and diversion tunnels. Oahe Dam Pierre, South Dakota As Form Design Engineer, Structural Superintendent, supervised erection of construction shops and buildings, planned and scheduled all concrete placement, and supervised design of concrete forms. Trinity Dam California As Construction Design Engineer, scheduled concrete placement in tunnels, shafts and powerhouse and supervised procurement and issuing of concrete materials. Pelton Dam Madras, Oregon As Construction Design Engineer, designed and scheduled forms and concrete for arch dam, powerhouse, and fish transportation channel. STONE & WEBSTER a LAXMIDAS V. POPAT ESTIMATING AND COST EDUCATION University of Cincinnati - Postgraduate work towards Ph.D. University of Cincinnati - M.S. in Water Resources & Hydraulics Minor: Environmental Engineering Gujarat University (India), L.E. College - B.E. in Civil Engineering TRAINING Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers - Course on Engineering Economy and Corporate Finance University of Washington - Cold Regions Engineering Course LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Alaska Certified Cost Engineer (C.C.E.) American Association of Cost Engineers PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Association of Cost Engineers (AACE)- Member Utility Cost Management Committee - Member Capital Cost Committee - Member Rocky Mountain Section, President Rocky Mountain Section, Vice President - Program Chairman PUBLICATIONS " The Economics of Geothermal Power." Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting, American Association of Cost Engineers, Houston, Texas, June 28, 1982 "Analysis of Published Data for Parametric Estimating of Boiler Plants - Part II." Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting American Association of Cost Engineers, Toronto, Ontario, July 1, 1981. " Analysis of Published Cost Data for Parametric Estimating of Coal Fired Power Plants." Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting American Association of Cost Engineers, Washington, D.C., July 1980, and 6th International Cost Engineering Congress, Mexico City, October 1980. " Darcy's Law During Unsteady Flow", with Dr. L. M. Daushey at 14th General Assembly, !.A.S.H. of |.U.G.G., Bern, Switzerland, October 1966. STONE & WEBSTER a LAXMIDAS V. POPAT PUBLICATIONS (Continued) " Effect of River Water Quality on Adjacent Aquifer", with Dr. H. C. Preul, presented at the Walter Resources Conference, Columbus, Ohio, September 1967. Text book on Irrigation and Storage for Engineering Degree Course for Gujarat University, India. EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Popat is Manager of the Estimating and Cost Division at the Denver Operations Center. Mr. Popat has over twenty-six (26) years of professional engineering experience in the fields of cost estimating, expenditure forecasting, economic analysis, hydraulics, water resources and environmental engineering, computer applications, systems analysis, specifications, technical papers and report writing. His present responsibilities as Manager include overall direction of estimating and cost activities for all Denver Operations Center projects, new business proposals, establishing and implementing procedures, job assignments, salary administration, training and evaluation of the division personnel. His prior experience includes serving in Stone & Webster's Environmental Engineering Division where he designed circulating water systems, performed economic analysis and provided input to environmental impact studies. In the Hydroelectric Division he served on the Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project in charge of Reservoir and River Flow Management Studies. Prior to joining Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Mr. Popat was a Hydraulic Engineer with Rackoff Associates, Inc., in Columbus, Ohio, Research Associate at the University of Cincinnati, Ohio, in the Civil Engineering Department, Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Gujarat University in India. For about seven years Mr. Popat worked in various capacities as subdivision officer and overseer in the State Public Works Department on large multipurpose (irrigation and storage) projects in India. LAXMIDAS V. POPAT DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado As Manager in the Estimating and Cost Division, his responsibilities include overall direction of estimating and cost activities for all Projects in Denver Operations Center; participates in preparation and presentations of New Business Proposals; establishes and implements procedures, job assignments, salary administration, training and evaluation of division personnel. During this period, assignments included overall direction and supervision of Estimating and Cost Functions on the following projects: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Department of Energy Atomic Vapor Laser lsotope Separation (AVLIS) Program Major contributor in the preparation, review and analysis of capital cost estimates and forecast of expenditure for several alternatives related to this large, complex new technology project. Responsibilities also included development and analysis of project integration and contingency costs and preparation of reports for submittal to the Department of Energy. Alaska Power Authority Bristol Bay Regional Power Feasibility Study, Cordova Power Supply Feasibility Studies, and Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project Provided estimating support for capital cost estimates and comparisons. Western Fuels - Utah, Inc. Bonanza Power Project Coal Transportation System The Project included 38 miles of electrified captive railroad with 3.5 miles overland conveyor. Responsibilities included review and approval of all cost and estimating related documents from the proposal through project completion. Specific responsibilities included review of project budget estimates, engineers' estimates, project forecasts and associated monitoring systems. Public Service Company of Colorado Southeast Colorado Project 2-500 MW Coal Fired Units Sacramento Municipal Utility District SMUDGEO #172 MW Geothermal Unit Public Service Company of New Mexico 600 MW Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Power Plant Salt River Project Various Pumped Storage Project Cost Studies. STONE & WEBSTER A LAXMIDAS V. POPAT Northern States Power Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Station Various cost estimates for existing circulating water system, containment and auxiliary building ventilation improvements. Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station and North Omaha Station Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Cost estimate to support alternate fuel study for power generation. Boeing Engineering & Construction Cost estimate for advanced central receiver solar power system. Montana Dakota Utilities Co. Project Manager for lignite-fired power plants cost study. Stone & Webster Management Consultants, Inc. High voltage cable research and materials testing facilities cost study. Public Utility District of Chelan County, Washington Rock Island Second Power House 8-54 MW Bulb Turbine - Hydroelectric Project Sierra Pacific Power Company North Valmy Station, Nevada Two 250 MW Coal-fired Units Wyodak Construction Company 330 MW Coal-fired Unit at Gillette, Wyoming U.S. Bureau of Mines Hydraulic Transport Research Facilities Several environmental economic evaluations of different coals, engineering and siting studies. In addition to specific project assignments, Mr. Popat has been responsible for the following in the Cost and Schedule Department. LAXMIDAS V. POPAT Order of Magnitude Estimates for various clients for alternate means of generation and alternate site locations having economic and environmental impacts. Environmental economic studies involving condenser cooling systems (towers, diffusers, spray nozzles, ponds), chemical treating and air quality control Systems (scrubbers, precipitators, etc.). Specific Project Assignments included the following: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Station Preliminary estimates for high energy pipe break modification for safe shutdown. General Electric Company Comparative estimates of cost for Twin versus Tandem Compound Turbine Generator Arrangement. San Diego Gas & Electric Company Sundesert Nuclear Project In charge of Project Estimating and Cost activities for this 1150 MW nuclear generating station. Power Authority of the State of New York Greene County Project Plant cost estimates for the application to the Public Service Commission of the State of New York. Nuclear steam supply evaluation differential cost estimates. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 Coordination of preliminary estimates and studies. Study of alternate cooling methods. Design, system layout, and cost benefit analysis of closed loop cooling schemes - mechanical and natural draft cooling towers. New England Power Company 800 MWe Oil-Fired Station As Project Estimator and Discipline Structural and Environmental Estimator, assigned to the Environmental Engineering Division, Mr. Popat was in charge of economic analysis of all Environmental Engineering Division projects including client contacts and liaison with Estimating and Cost Department for Environmental Engineering Division work. STONE & WEBSTER A LAXMIDAS V. POPAT Documentation of computer programs for cooling tower fog analysis. Design manuals for (1) Determination of Equilibrium Temperature; (2) Diffuser Design. Participated in the Task Force for preparation of environmental reports and benefit cost analysis. During this period Mr. Popat worked on the following projects: James A. FitzPatrick Power Plant Power Authority of the State of New York Hydraulic - Environmental engineering on screen well flow reversal studies for this 848 MW Boiling Water Reactor nuclear station. Gulf States Utilities Company River Bend Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Completed -design, system layout, cost benefit analysis and fogging study for mechanical draft cooling towers. Upper Peninsula Power Company Presque Isle Station, Units 5 and 6 Design of lake diffuser scheme. Niagra Mohawk Power Corporation Oswego Steam Station, Unit 5 Prepared a section of the Environmental Report on the subject - "Alternate Methods of Cooling" for this 855 MW oil-fired station. Engineering and design of condenser cooling circulating water system. This included once-through cooling (lake diffuser scheme) and closed loop cooling tower schemes. Work involved optimization of system, including performance and cost comparison, specifications for circulating water pumps, traveling water screens, and cooling towers. Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station Supplementary Cooling System - System layout, engineering, and design of hydraulic structures, circulating water piping, pumps and mechanical draft cooling towers. Northeast Utilities Service Company Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project Design of air orifice for the surge tank complex of the Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Project. Proposed reservoir and river flow management procedures for the Northfield Mountain and Turners Falls Projects. LAXMIDAS V. POPAT Design of the level, volume, and flow control equipment for semi-automatic operation of the plant and manual operation of the Turners Falls spillway gates to discharge the routed flow. Specifications for instrumentation and controls such as data acquisition, digital telemetering, and data processing equipment. Documentation of six computer programs for hydrolibrary. RACKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. Columbus, Ohio Hydraulic Engineer - During this period, the following hydraulic studies and designs for highways were completed. West Freeway I-70, Columbus, Ohio U.S. 119 West Virginia 1-24 Kentucky Major storm sewer and large lift station for |-70 UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Cincinnati, Ohio Research Assistant - Worked on the following research projects during this period: Flow through porous media - "Darcy's Law During Unsteady Flow". Effect of river water quality on adjacent acquifiers. Urban runoff quantity and its characteristics. Optimization of water resources systems. Testing of steel sign posts, plastics and concrete. Worked toward M.S. degree and as Research Assistant at the University of Cincinnati. GOVERNMENT POLYTHECHNIC Ahmedabad, India Lecturer in civil engineering. Taught surveying, strength of materials, hydraulics, water supply, sanitary and irrigation engineering. STATE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gujarat State, India Technical adviser, technical scrutiny, administrative approval, and sanctions of major multipurpose projects. STONE & WEBSTER A LAXMIDAS V. POPAT BHADAR IRRIGATION PROJECT SUBDIVISION Subdivisional Officer, State P.W.D. Survey, investigation and design of Bhadar Project Canal Works; shifting and rehabilitation of villages submerged in reservoir area, including relocation of roads, bridges, and public buildings. IRRIGATION INVESTIGATION DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Junior Engineer - Technical scrutiny, revision and modifications of plans, estimates, designs and specification of Irrigation and storage projects. Supervision of the drafting branch of the division. MERRELL R. ANDERSON PLANNING AND SCHEDULING EDUCATION Northeastern University - B.S. in Engineering Management Northeastern University - A.S. in Mechanical Engineering Various management courses conducted by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Project Management Institute - Member EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Anderson has over twenty-nine (29) years of experience in project management, project planning, and mechanical engineering/design. The last nine years were with Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) in the Planning Division. The previous 19 years were in Aerospace, with AVCO/SD and Pratt Whitney Aircraft, working in engineering and management. Mr. Anderson is currently the Supervisor of the Planning and Scheduling Division, responsible for the technical and administrative supervision of the planning group on a number of power projects, plant modifications and outage planning. Previous experience in Aerospace included Project Engineer on a cross service, re-entry vehicle design/development and flight test program. Design experience included thin walled shells, aerospace ground equipment, and pressure vessels. STONE & WEBSTER A MERRELL R. ANDERSON DETAILED EXPERIENCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Denver, Colorado and Boston, Massachusetts Planning and Scheduling Division As Supervisor, responsible for technical and administrative supervision of planning division personnel. This includes assigning planners to projects, assuring compliance of planner/planning standards, allocating and monitoring division budgets, developing division manpower forecasting, establishing and maintaining division policy, enhancing personnel communications, and conducting salary and/or promotional reviews. Special Project Group As Lead Planner, supervised a planning group in the preparation and maintenance of CPM-type schedules for new power plants, backfits, Conversions, modifications, and outage planning. Assignments included complete planning and scheduling services for Sacramento Municipal Utility District's SMUDGEO #1 geothermal unit. For this task, bar chart schedules were prepared in support of the licensing (Application for Certification submitted to the California Energy Commission) effort. A summary schedule was prepared and updated monthly for management. A semi-detailed engineering schedule was prepared and updated monthly, as was an engineering and procurement (E&P) list. These two documents were the primary scheduling tools for making the schedule analysis and monitoring job status. A semi-detailed construction schedule was prepared and was implemented after construction startup. Also, a detailed initial operation test schedule was prepared by the Boston test group. This schedule was coordinated with both the engineering schedule and the construction schedule. For Northern States Power Company SWEC has been providing planning services for many years. Scheduling was provided for a major modification to the Intake/Discharge Water Systems for their Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant. Detailed engineering schedules were developed for this task. The schedule was updated monthly with input provided to NSP's computerized scheduling program. Similar services were provided to NSP for their fluid bed oil to wood conversion at the French Island Generating Station. In addition, a number of schedules are being maintained for in-plant modifications at this nuclear station. For Portland General Electric, semi-detailed engineering schedules were developed by the Special Project Group for the addition of a Technical Support Center at the Trojan Nuclear Generating Station; a semi-detailed construction schedule was also developed to support the construction management effort. MERRELL R. ANDERSON For the Omaha and Nebraska Public Power Districts, the group has been providing planning and scheduling services in support of SWEC's continuing services contract for nuclear and fossil units. Scheduling services have been provided for plant security systems, radwaste modifications, fire protection systems, electric reboiler ATWS, building additions and modifications, and post-TMI modifications. Included in this work were engineering, drawing, construction, and outage schedules. For Western Fuels-Utah, the group prepared a number of schedules in support of study efforts for the delivery of coal from a mine in Colorado to a power plant in Utah. A summary schedule was prepared for the conceptual engineering effort; a detailed engineering schedule was prepared for the final engineering. A construction schedule was implemented for monitoring the multiple contracts on this project. As Lead Planner in the Special Projects Group in the SWEC Boston office, responsible for the preparation and auditing of CPM networks for backfits, modifications, and outage planning on a number of operating nuclear and large fossil plants. In the performance of this task, supervised the group's work and prepared schedule analyses of engineering and construction performance based upon an interpretation of the critical path(s). Prepared budgets in conjunction with manpower forecasts and coordinated with site construction personnel and the Client. Gained experience in the scheduling logic for engineering and construction power plants, including computerized networks (EZIPERT), CPM reports, E&P reports, valve schedules, instrument lists, and cost management. The Special Projects Planning Group has provided planning and scheduling services for numerous major plant backfits/modifications: reboiler installation, evaporators, recirculation spray piping, spent fuel pool modifications, radwaste systems, and independent LPCI MOV power supplies. In addition, planning services have been provided for minor plant modifications: changeout of pressure gages, temperature recorders, small valves, and piping. AVCO/SYSTEMS DIVISION Wilmington, Massachusetts As Project Engineer on a small re-entry vehicle program for the U. S. Air Force, helped establish the program requirements and prepared cost estimates and schedules for the proposal effort. Post-award efforts included the allocation and monitoring of budgets for engineering, manufacturing, and the test site at Vandenberg AFB, California. Coordinated the interfaces with the various government agencies and prepared monthly progress reports. Other experience at AVCO was gained in engineering, with a brief assignment as Assistant Site Manager at the White Sands, New Mexico test site. The engineering and test work for this period related to re-entry vehicle technology. PRATT WHITNEY AIRCRAFT Boston, Massachusetts As design draftsman, prepared drawings of aircraft engines. STONE & WEBSTER a ENCLOSURE 4 - SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation has been engineering, designing and constructing generating facilities, substations, and transmission lines for over 80 years. Projects have been successfully completed in all geographical areas of the United States for hundreds of clients, and have included many pioneering developments. These installations range from small industrial plants to large mine-mouth public utility stations that transmit their output to load centers over EHV transmission lines. Other services include improvement and consulting services to operating fossil plants. The fuels used include coal, gas, and furnace gas, and many other industrial residues. Power stations recently completed, or currently being constructed, include both large and small stations, cycling and baseload units, and water-cooled and air-cooled facilities. Some are supercritical, with double reheat capability. In the past 10 years we have designed, engineered, and in most cases, constructed over 14,800 MW of fossil-fired generating capacity in this country. Of this total, more than 7,500 MW are coal-fired. Much of this general experience is applicable to a geothermal project; and, SWEC also has significant experience on geothermal plants and is a leader in the geothermal field. SWEC has built a geothermal team with capabilities, training and specific experience in all disciplines for the solution of geothermal engineering problems. The following is a chronology of our pertinent geothermal experience. Resident Engineer Program Prior to full participation in any commercial geothermal projects, SWEC became active in specific studies and research related to geothermal development. SWEC participated in the Geothermal Resident Engineer Program at Sandia Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico from November 1976 to May 6, 1977. A Resident Engineer in the Geothermal Drilling and Well Logging Research Program was assigned to Sandia and fully sponsored by SWEC. This sponsorship and participation is indicative of SWEC's interest and commitment to the development and utilization of geothermal energy resources. STONE & WEBSTER a Sierra Pacific Power Co. During 1978 and 1979, SWEC assisted Sierra Pacific Power Company in connection with two potential geothermal projects. An expression of interest was developed for submittal to ERDA/DOE (Desert Peak Geothermal site-Union Oil Co. also participated) and a proposal was prepared (Joint Utility Geothermal Project - five other utilities also involved). Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) In early 1979, SMUD decided to proceed with the development of a geothermal power station at The Geysers Known Geothermal Resource Area (KGRA) in northern California. This was the first geothermal development for the District. After a competitive selection process, SWEC's Denver Operations Center was selected to provide Architect/Engineering services for the plant, subsequently named "SMUDGEO #1" by the District. The scope of SWEC's services on the project includes licensing and environmental services, engineering, design, procurement, quality assurance, inspection, expediting, construction management, and startup. The site is on federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Aminoil USA, Inc., is the leaseholder and steam field developer, supplying geothermal steam to the plant at 115 psia and 338 degrees fahrenheit. Mitsubishi International Corporation was selected to furnish the turbine generator, a four-flow machine rated at 55 MW at 4 inches of mercury backpressure. The cooling system is designed to operate at about 1-1/2 inches of mercury, resulting in a gross power “generation of a nominal 72 MW from the one million pounds per hour of steam entering the plant. H2S emissions from the plant are potentially the most serious environmental problem. To meet the stringent Sonoma County air quality limits, a Stretford system was installed to control gaseous emissions. Condensate treatment is also applied to reduce H2S levels in the circulating water. Construction began in the spring of 1981 and the unit has been in a sustained operational mode producing 110% of rated capacity since September 1983. Occidential Geothermal, Inc. (OXY) This 80 MW net geothermal project is a small power production facility as defined by the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978. Under this act, a steam supplier may own and operate a geothermal power plant and sell the resultant power to electric utilities. The OXY plant is located in Lake County, California along the ridgeline of the Mayacmas Mountains. Steam will be supplied from federal leases secured by OXY. The power plant facilities occupy 7.4 acres and consists of two turbine generator units, cooling towers, hydrogen sulfide emission control systems, an electrical switchyard, and a service building. A short tapline will transmit power to the existing transmission facilities at The Geysers. STONE & WEBSTER a Economics dictated a different plant design than was developed for SMUD. Since OXY cannot sell more than 80 MW, but can sell anything less than this amount that can be produced, there is a great incentive to be capable of producing power under all conditions. Thus the plant has two approximately 48 MW gross turbine generators so that if one unit trips or is down for overhaul, the other will still be generating power. For the same reason, the turbines will operate normally with a throttle pressure of 100 psig, but have the capability of operating at 150 psig (the steamfield gathering system design pressure) when one unit is down, with the further provisions that the generators are sized for the power produced at this higher pressure. SWEC is providing licensing and environmental services, engineering, design, procurement, quality assurance, inspection, expediting, construction management, and startup services. The licensing application was filed January 28, 1981. Construction began in April 1982, following the Energy Commission's one year review cycle. The plant was completed in March 1984, 23 months after construction start and is currently producing power at rated output. Thermal Power Company (Natomas) and Dillingham In mid 1981 SWEC was contracted by Thermal-Dillingham to provide conceptual design for a 25 MW geothermal power plant at a hot-water dominated resource area on the island of Hawaii. Services included the preparation of preliminary drawings and specifications, a cost estimate, and a brief evaluation of licensing activities. Chaffe Geothermal, Ltd. In mid 1982 SWEC contracted with Chaffee Geothermal, Ltd. to perform preliminary design and cost estimates for the construction of a geothermal pipeline for the Las Cruces Project. Also in 1982, SWEC prepared two plant estimates and investigated the regulatory requirements for a 3 MWe plant at Dixie Valley. The two estimates were prepared for low temperature generation using a binary-cycle process and a bi-phase rotary separator turbine in conjunction with a low-pressure steam turbine. Conceptual engineering was provided to the extent necessary to support the estimates. The Geysers Geothermal Users Group SWEC prepared design criteria and a preliminary conceptual study with equipment locations and building layouts for a central maintenance facility in The Geysers. The facility would serve to eliminate any normal major maintenance performed outside The Geysers area. Natomas Energy Company After competitive selection SWEC was selected to perform licensing and preliminary engineering and design services for the Davies Project, a proposed 25 MW geothermal plant in The Geysers. This effort culminated in the publication of a Use Permit Application submitted to the Lake County, California Planning Commission, totaling 650 pages, involving 21 authors from seven firms. STONE & WEBSTER A Thermal Power Company (Natomas) SWEC studied alternative H2S abatement processes and developed an engineering estimate of twin modular 12.5 MW geothermal units on the island of Hawaii based on preliminary design from previous work. Central California Power Agency No. 1 (CCPA No. 1) In 1983 SWEC was selected to license, engineer, design, and manage the construction (including startup) of the Coldwater Canyon Project, a 55 MW geothermal power plant located in The Geysers area in Northern California. The plant is being developed for CCPA No. 1, a consortium composed of Sacramento Municipal Utility District and Modesto Irrigation District. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company SWEC was recently selected to prepare an Independent Consultant's report on the 33 MW Salton Sea Geothermal - Electric Project at Niland, California. This document examines the feasibility of the project and provides a technical assessment of the plant design. SWEC will also audit and evaluate the construction phase and evaluated the completion tests. STONE & WEBSTER Ad