Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment 1981
BETH oO} PROPOSAL FOR BETHEL AREA POWER PLAN FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT SUBMITTED TO \ ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY ANCHORAGE, ALASKA PROPERTY OF: Alaska Power Authority 334 W. 5th Ave. _ HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY, ANCHORAGE WITH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES, ANCHORAGE AEIDC, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, ANCHORAGE DAMES & MOORE, ANCHORAGE HARDING & LAWSON, ANCHORAGE NUNAM KITLUTSISTI, BETHEL JACOBS ASSOCIATES, SAN FRANCISCO NOVEMBER, 1981 PROJECT CONCEPT Electrical energy costs in Bethel and the surrounding vil- lages are presently high due to the substantial increase in the cost of fuel oil for the diesel powered generation and the isola- ted nature of the generation. These energy costs impose a finan- cial burden on the economy and residents of the area. The native residents, accustomed to a subsistence economy rather than a cash economy, are particularly affected by the costs for energy. Be- thel, as the center of demand for services, trade and transporta- tion in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta area, exhibits a mixture of subsistence and cash economies with more ability to absorb high energy costs than the villages. However, the high energy costs in Bethel affects the largest number of households and commercial activities in the region, which also impacts the cost of trade and services to the villages. The current dependence of the region on fuel oil and the impact of high energy costs requires that alter- native energy plans be developed which provide the region with a means of minimizing market area energy costs. This feasibility assessment is being conducted to develop an energy supply plan which can achieve this goal. The present power generation capacity at Bethel is 10,500 kw. This is about five times greater than the combined capacity of all of the surrounding 12 villages. The capacity available in the villages ranges from 50 to 450 kW. The geographical distribution of electrical energy capacity and future demand in the study area is an ideal situation for development of a centralized efficient supply and transmission intertie system. However, the actual physical and environmental conditions in the study area impose constraints on such a system. There are no transmission interties between the villages, with the exception of Kasigluk and Nunapit- ckuk. Coventional transmission interties in the area are costly to build and maintain with system reliability because of the per- mafrost, surface terrain, and climatic conditions of the area. The lower Kuskokwim Delta region has significant environmental value for fishing, waterfowl, and other natural resources which support native subsistence, and the study area is within the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. The Reconnaissance Study by Retherford concludes (solely on an economic basis) that a centralized power generation system with transmission interties is the most promising electric energy re- source, provided that the interties are economically feasible. The economic and technical feasibility of these interties are being evaluated based on the single wire ground return (SWGR) demonstration projects at Bethel and Kobuk. The construction and operating experience of the Bethel project and the construction experience at the Kobuk project will provide a reasonable basis for conclusive evaluation of the technical and economic feasibili- ty of intertie transmission. Preliminary results indicate a construction cost of $60,000 per mile with good short-term technical performance. This construction cost is much greater than the cost used in the economic analysis for the Reconnaissance Study. Thus, the economics of a regional centralized generation and intertie system must be reassessed and the environmental impact of the intertie system must be included in this assessment in order to arrive at a conclusive evaluation of the overall benefit of transmission intertie. The results of the evaluation of intertie feasibility will be used in all of the regional energy plans in comparison to a decentralized generation system with individual generation in each community. A cost-benefit ratio analysis for transmission to villages at greater distances from Bethel will be performed to determine if intertie will lower cost of energy to these villages relative to other alternatives. Previous studies of electrical energy supply in the Bethel region have resulted in conclusions that a central generation source should be developed on the Kisaralik River and energy. sup- plied to the villages within 50 miles of Bethel by transmission interties. Transmission interties of the villages with Bethel was evaluated to be economically promising even with continued expan- sion of diesel generation at Bethel. These studies only seriously addressed hydroelectric and diesel energy supply options in their economic analysis of alternatives. The Kisaralik hydropower de- velopment, as proposed, deserves further consideration to adequately address the environmental impact of such a project and to assess whether the project can be further optimized in relation to demand, environmental mitigation, and construction costs. The -construction costs for the proposed Golden Gate Hydroelectric Project appear to be low based on current hydroelectric construc- tion cost trends experienced in Alaska. Higher costs could affect the economic viability of a hydroelectric project, particularly because of the limited size of the energy market. Recent studies on coal resource development and further Alas- kan experience with waste heat recovery systems, wind generating units, and energy conservation and storage systems have introduced additional energy supply and substitution options. These alterna- tives should be analyzed definitively by making an objective and thorough identification and comparison of the feasibility of all viable energy supply plans. The principle objective of this assessment is to determine the best electrical energy supply plan(s) for Bethel and the twelve villages in the surrounding area. To meet this objective, a base plan and two alternative plans are to be formulated and the feasibility of these plans are to be assessed at a consistent level of confidence in plan costs, resource availability, technic- al feasibility, system reliability, and environmental impact. The economic, technical, and environmental aspects of the two alterna- tive plans are to be compared with the base plan to arrive at a preferred energy supply plan(s) for the communities in the study area. A supplementary objective of the assessment is to determine if there are opportunities for conservation measures, such as waste heat recapture, that can meet space heating or other energy needs and if they can be incorporated into supply plans to the extent that they economically complement electrical energy supply. A second supplementary objective is to assess the potential for cogeneration thereby increasing electrical energy supply, efficiency and reliability. An example of this might be the feasibility of a village school diesel generating plant being combined with a village plant for back-up power and increased firm power. A third supplementary objective is to assess which known available fuel resources and commercially available generation technologies are viable to be included in the alternative energy supply plans. The base supply plan, continued diesel generation, will be studied. Conservation opportunities which can reduce the overall energy costs to the communities will be investigated such as, the _ Waste heat recapture system for space heat use presently being constructed by the Bethel Utilities Corporation. Conservation and cogeneration potential requires identification and assessment. Wind energy units which can be demonstrated to be compatible with village generation and distribution systems, and withstand climatic conditions without high servicing costs will be analyzed. The base plan, with and without interties, will be studied to determine the lowest cost energy arrangement associated with intertying the villages. Economic analyses will be conducted for alternative base plans which integrate waste heat recapture, cogeneration, wind generation, and village intertie to establish the optimum arrangement. The alternative supply plan, hydroelectric generation, ap- pears to be dependent on the feasibility of hydroelectric develop- ment on the Kisaralik River. Small capacity hydroelectric devel- opment in the delta area does not appear to have potential since the rivers and streams have very flat gradients. Development of hydropower on the Kisaralik River requires resolution of environ-. mental resource management issues, careful optimization of ins- talled capacity, and proper timing of the selected installation in relation to electrical demand. The proposed Kisaralik River project does not offer signifi- cant opportunities for conservation and energy substitution except those which can be justified within the existing system. Without transmission interties, the supply plan for villages is the same as the base case without interties. The second alternative supply plan is presently conceived to be installation of a coal-fired steam plant near Bethel with ma- rine transport of coal from sources outside of the Bethel area. Application of the results of the Northwest Coal Study to the Bethel region indicates promise with respect to the cost of coal delivered to Bethel by waterway. Opportunities of cogeneration and district heating associated with steam generation, as well as the potential for use of the fuel for direct space heating also indicate that coal-fired generation should be assessed as a poten- tially viable alternative. Potential environmental impacts of air quality and water quality associated with coal plants are judged to be acceptable with adequate engineering safeguards and emission control equipment. The potential availability of adequate natural gas reserves may be established during the study and included by the Alaska Power Authority in the Power Plan Study. Gas turbine generation in the study area seems attractive upon cursory examination. However, pipeline construction costs in the tundra could become prohibitive for resources remotely located from Bethel. In addition, the resource potential may have to be large enough to attract development from other markets to share pipeline costs and well-head development costs. Extraction and transport costs as well as the nature of any supply contracts would be critical aspects of the development of a generation plan. Such a plan, given secure long-term gas contracts of favorable rates to control risk of fuel price escalation, has high potential for stabilizing the area energy cost. while minimizing adverse social and environmental impacts and enhancing environmental values to the extent possible. The supply plans will be developed to be compatible with the unique physical, environmental and socio-economic conditions of the study area. A careful assessment of these conditions will result in the develop- ment of supply plans that maximize the likelihood of project fi- nancing and implementation. The competing plans will be developed to a consistent level of conceptual design, reliable plan costs and determination of the nature and extent of environmental and social impacts. Mitigation measures will be identified that could offset adverse impacts. The economic, technical and environmental aspects of the two alternative plans will be compared with the base plan to arrive at a preferred energy supply plan for the communities in the study area. There are several non-energy related studies and agency pro- grams that will significantly affect the course of this study. The most significant of these are the: fo} Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge, and ° Kisaralik River Wild and Scenic Rivers System The entire area within a 50-mile radius of Bethel and all of the lands and waters to be affected by the proposed Kisaralik River Hydroelectric Projet (FERC Project 3175, preliminary permit pending) are within the boundaries of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. Also, the Kisaralik River, from its source at Kisaralik Lake to its discharge to the Kiskokwin River, has been found eligible for inclusion into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Other agency programs that will interrelate with the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment include: ° The Bristol Bay Cooperative Region Study; ° The Oil and Gas Leasing Program under Section 1008 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act; ° Wildlife and fisheries conservation as managed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game; and ° Programs and policies of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and other federal and state agencies charged with main- taining the well-being of native people. These programs will influence study activities, and require coordination throughout the study. They may have specific bearing on energy requirements and development opportunities in the re- gion. Our approach to addressing the issues and uncertainties in- volved is to begin with an update of the 20-year forecast of elec- trical and space heating energy requirements with explicit consid- eration of population, economic activity, energy costs, end uses, applicance saturation levels, existing energy production facili- ties and potential substitution between energy forms. The fore- casted electrical requirements will be met by the formulation of a base and two alternative electrical supply plans. Each plan will be optimized in concept, size, and operation to provide a reliable project plan that will produce power at the lowest cost possible, f CAPABILITIES Introduction Harza Engineering Company has carefully developed an association with firms in Alaska for the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment based on two major criteria. These are the specialized capabilities and expertise of the firms within the broad range of energy technology required for the study and their relevant geographic experience in Alaska which is also directly applicable to the study requirements. The relationships between the organization comprising the project team are depicted on Exhibit 1, which also indicates the major areas of program responsibility for each participating firm. The proposed association of firms has the full capability to carry hydroelectric, wind, coal, natural gas, and diesel generation, conservation and transmission projects through design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction management. In addition, the association of firms has direct experience in Alaska with most of the technical, economic and environmental aspects of these projects. Harza has recent successful experience in the FERC licensing process for hydropower projects and is currently assisting the Alaska Power Authority in a December submittal of the FERC License Application for the Black Bear Lake Project in Alaska. The major attributes of each firm which will contribute to the successful completion of this assessment are itemized as follows: Harza Engineering Company - Extensive organizational and project management experience in major studies; energy planning, demand forecasting, economics, and environmental experience, including Alaska; experience in hydroelectric, diesel projects; contractual experience with the Alaska Power Authority. Stefano & Associates, Inc. - Major Alaskan experience in community planning and projects in Bethel; complete capability and Alaskan experience in coal, natural gas, diesel and wind generation of the scale under consideration for this study; low voltage transmission line experience in the Yukon delta; waste heat recovery and conservation experience in Alaska. AEIDC - Alaskan experience in environmental and physical resource assessments for energy projects; previous experience in the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta region and with the Bethel area; close working relationships with state and federal environmental agencies; efficient application of physical and environmental data bases to meet project requirements. Dames & Moore - Recent experience in coal resource assessment in western Alaska; full capability and Alaskan experience in assessing technology, environmental impact and economics of most fuel resources; diversified technical, environmental and economic experience throughout Alaska. Harding & Lawson - Comprehensive capability and experience in arctic geotechnical engineering; experience in western Alaskan projects. Nunam Kitlutsisti - Established working relationships and acceptability to villages in the study area for effective public participation and for support of data gathering in the villages. Jacobs Associates - Construction consulting experience in Alaska, including construction advisor to the owner on the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project and preparation of construction cost estimate for the Snettisham Power Project. The firms do not have major previous working relationships for Alaskan projects, although there are numerous previous working relationships among individuals within the firms. We are confident that this will be advantageous to the desired performance of a balanced objective study. The alternative energy plans will be developed with a more independent assessment of technical, environmental and economic factors. The project team will have established a good working relationship in the latter portion of the study when integration of capabilities is important to fully assess the merits of competing plans. During the preparation of this proposal Mr. Paul Ford, Harza's Project Manager, has established personal relationships with key individuals in each firm and will be resident in Harza's Anchorage office to facilitate a close working relationship among the Anchorage and Bethel offices of team members. In addition, a strong management plan has been developed as described in the Project Manager section (E) to enhance the working relationships among firms. Capabilities of Firms Harza and the firms associated in the project team for this study have extensive combined resources capable of providing services for essentially any aspect or phase of energy development in the study area. More than 2500 personnel are represented by the firms and the technical and management capabilities are comprehensive. General background, capability and project experience information are provided under Supplemental Information for reference as follows: Harza Engineering Company Description of Harza Hydroelectric Power Plants Earthfill & Rockfill Dams Environmental and Permitting Assistance Transmission Systems Prefeasibility, Feasibility, and Financial Studies Experience in Applications before FERC Electric Systems Forecasts and Planning Experience in Engineering for Diesel Projects Experience in Engineering for Gas Turbine Plants Experience in Engineering of Transmission Lines Harza Distribution Experience Major Electric Power Substations Harza Engineering Company Procedures for Project Cost Estimating Tabulation of Cost Estimating Data for Major Projects Stefano & Associates, Inc. Description of Stefano & Associates Power Generation and Heating Plant Projects Waste Heat Recapture Projects in Alaska Darbyshire & Associates, Inc. The Renewable Energy Group AEIDC, University of Alaska Description of AEIDC Dames & Moore Mining Industry Capabilities Experience Experience in Alaska Harding & Lawson Brochure Anchorage, Alaska Office Soil & Foundation Engineering Geological and Geophysical Investigations Alaskan Project Locations Nunam Kitlutsisti Description of Organization Jacobs Associates Construction Performances Capabilities by Technology The following tabulation summarizes the most pertinent capabilities and experience of project team members by technology with emphasis on relevant Alaskan experience. ENERGY PLANNING - HARZA - Black Bear Lake Project,-feasibility studies, and many other studies throughout the world. - STEFANO - M. Newell prepared a village scale integrated energy system for the Norton Sound area, and other members of the group have had numerous energy planning assignments. ENERGY DEMAND FORECASTING - HARZA - Black Bear Lake Project in Alaska and most other power projects where economical size needs to be related to demand. Completed more than 30 electric systems forecasts and planning assignments involving load and energy forecasts, power markets surveys and long range plans on international basis. - STEFANO - R. Darbyshire has completed population projections for the City of Bethel as part of its Comprehensive Plan. The data and techniques utilized in this work will be updated as one aspect leading to reliable energy demand forecasting for the project area, - NUNAM KITLUTSISTI - Has been working since 1975 to identify energy usage and to provide information to the villages of western Alaska on energy use and cost, potential energy conservation measures, and alternative energy systems. DIESEL GENERATION - STEFANO - 12 assignments in Alaska on plants ranging from 60 to 3000 kw. HARZA - 81 units for 31 plants ranging from 100 to 7500 kW. COAL/WOOD-FIRED STEAM GENERATION - STEFANO - Designed and installed thirty power boilers and more than 80 megawatts of generation during the past thirty years. Technical and environmental planning has led to the development of the only coal-fired plant combustion and fixed carbon recycling system that was able to meet EPA particulate emission standards established ten years after initial plant operation. GAS TURBINE GENERATION - STEFANO - 7,000 and 10,000 kw plants at Fairbanks and Tyonek, respectively. The plant at Fairbanks is equipped with a 3000#/hr. waste heat recovery system. HARZA - Appraisal through construction services on 10 projects and 21 units on international basis. WIND SYSTEM GENERATION - STEFANO - M. Newell has designed a wind generator intertie for the Bethel National Guard Armory and wind energy systems for Pilot Station, Sheldon Point and Cherak, and other wind energy projects throughout the state. Authored the Alaskan Wind Energy Handbook. - AEIDC - Office of the State Climatologist, and depository of all Alaskan climatic records. Presently conducting a project to produce a wind-power atlas for Alaska and a report on the procedures and data used in performing the wind-power assessment. HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION - HARZA - Comprehensive hydroelectric capability. Completed 24 hydroelectric projects with public agencies since World War II. These include ten projects for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, five for Public Utility Districts, four for state power authorities, and three for municipalities. Harza's experience with the Alaska Power Authority includes the reconnaissance studies for the Thayer Creek, Cathedral Falls, Black Bear Lake, and Gartina Creek Hydroelectric Projects, and the Feasibility Study and FERC License Application for the Black Bear Lake Project. Harza is currently updating the feasibility study for the Chester Lake Project. - AEIDC - Conducted environmental studies and provided technical input for the Terror Lake, Grant Lake, and hydroelectric projects using "state-of-the-art" technology. - STEFANO - T. Humphrey participated in the northwest Alaska small hydropower reconnaissance study. TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION - HARZA - Provides system development services covering the complete range of transmission line voltages (from 34.5 to 765 kV) and geographic conditions from arctic and mountain regions to cultivated farm lands and deserts. The scope of Harza's more than 55 transmission projects has ranged from the design of short interconnections to the analysis and upgrading of entire national systems. - STEFANO - T. Humphrey is currently completing construction on the second generation design of a 15-kv single wire ground return demonstration project at Kobuk, Alaska. Construction is ahead of schedule on this "state-of-the- art" project. FUELS EXTRACTION, TRANSPORT AND ECONOMICS - STEFANO - Study of. potential for coal mining for power generation at Wainwright, and for design of a mine mouth power plant at Healy. - AEIDC - Evaluated environmental impacts associated with coal development in the Kukpowrvk, Nenana, and Beluga coal fields. - DAMES & MOORE - Northwestern Alaska Coal Resources Study WASTE HEAT RECOVERY/COGENERATION - STEFANO - Installed the first successful remote village waste heat bottom cycle recapture project in Alaska at Naknek in 1969-70 for the Naknek Electric Association. The system has provided heat for the grade and high school complex without the use of the existing boiler plant since installation. Ten other waste heat recovery projects in Alaska. CONSERVATION/SPACE HEAT CONVERSION - STEFANO - Prepared conceptual design for reconverting heating system for a supermarket for use of coal. Originally built to use coal but converted to oil. Studies show coal to be more attractive at this time. Comparable study completed for University of Alaska. ARCTIC ENGINEERING - HARZA - Design of the Burfell and Hrauneyjafoss projects in Iceland and nine cold climate region projects in Canada, ranging from 18 to 300 feet in head. Special design features to resolve ice jamming and frazil ice problems were successfully incorporated into the Iceland projects. - STEFANO — Design and construction of numerous structures throughout Alaska. - HARDING & LAWSON - Geotechnical services ranging from COMMUNITY housing developments and schools in remote villages to complex industrial facilities throughout the state. PLANNING - STEFANO - Ralph Darbyshire and Associates (affiliated for this project with Ralph Stefano) has recently prepared the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Bethel. They have also prepared a series of community profiles for six villages in the upper Tanana region of Alaska. - NUNAM KITLUTSISTI - This organization was formed by the Association of Village Council Presidents, the regional nonprofit Yupik Eskimo corporation in the Yukon Kuskokwim delta region in Southwestern Alaska to work specifically with AVCP, and its member villages, on environmental concerns related to the use of renewable and non-renewable resources in the Yukon Kuskokwin delta area. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - NUNAM KITLUTSISTI - The central philosophy of Nunam Kitlutsisti is that the villagers in the AVCP region should effectively participate in any decisions made which affect the regions renewable and nonrenewable resources. Thus, the organization's goal is to provide information to the villages and their elected bodies about decisions being made in regard to their resources so that they can become involved in that process. As an organization composed of members from throughout the project area, it can work effectively in collecting input from and disseminating information to the villages and people who have a vital interest in the results of this study. FERC APPLICATIONS - HARZA -— Since 1970 Harza has participated in eleven FERC license applications. Prior to 1970, Harza participated in twenty license applications with c thirteen projects licensed and in operation and two other projects licensed. Our current activities include i the preparation of the License Application for the Black vo Bear Lake Project (Alaska), the Jim Falls Project (Wisconsin), the Boundary Dam and Sullivan Creek 5 | Projects in Washington, and the Raystown Project ‘ (Pennsylvania). We are also replying to the comments = made by the FERC and other public agencies to the - Kootenai License Application. \ ENVIRONMENTAL & PERMITTING ASSISTANCE - HARZA - Harza's Environmental Sciences Section provides a complete staff iy of environmental scientists experienced in the \ preparation of FERC and other federal and state license ; and permit applications. This team includes terrestrial fae) ecologists, aquatic biologists, botanists, wildlife : biologists, resource inventory specialists, fisheries — biologists, and landscape/recreation planners. | | Coordination between this group of environmental Ls scientists and project engineers ensures the integration of environmental values into resource planning and development. This coordination throughout all stages of ! project planning produces cost-effective management ” solutions that render the project maximally compatible \ with public aspirations, government regulations, and ( ecological values. é -AEIDC-has conducted field studies of the potential effects cy of three Alaska hydroelectric developments in order to } predict their effects on fish, wildlife, and their habitats. During 1980, AEIDC pioneered use in, and 4 adaptation for, Alaska of the incremental method of he instream flow analysis, originally developed by the U.S. _ Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Cooperative Instream my Flow Service Group at Ft. Collins, Colorado. _) -DAMES & MOORE-offers senior professional expertise cognizant of the state's unique ecology, biology, oceanography, | planning, foundation and soils engineering, geology, and i \ socioeconomics. Services have spanned the state--from Ketchikan to Prudhoe Bay, from Fairbanks to Dutch Harbor-~and have ranged from soils and foundation investigations to complex environmental impact — statements and socioeconomic analyses. ws COST ESTIMATING-JACOBS- Specialized knowledge of the construction field activities and cost estimating in particular. r Construction advisor to the owner on the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project and preparation of construction cost estimate for the Snettisham Power Project. fi Considerable cost estimating experience on ‘the ALEYASKA i pipeline. (2 02 ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS -LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE -—— mame = | AND FEDERAL AGENCIES ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE GROUPS | | a STEFANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. THERMAL POWER GENERATION WASTE HEAT, COGENERATION WIND ENERGY, SOCIOECONOMICS LOW-VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION HARZA ENGINEERING CO. ENERGY SYSTEM PLANNING, FORECASTING, CONSERVATION, RELIABILITY AND ECONOMICS _. HYDROPOWER GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION AEIDC, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, IMPACT EVALUATION, AND MITIGATION OF GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION ALTERNATIVES ___ DAMES & MOORE FUELS SOURCES, TRANSPORT, . ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HARDING AND LAWSON ARTIC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING NUNAM KITLUTSISTI bee ree or dee ee ee LI PUBLIC PARTICIPATION JACOBS ASSOCIATES COST ESTIMATE REVIEW o—meeee LINES OF CONTRACT RELATIONSHIPS —— <= LINES OF COMMUNICATIONS on ooo Ce co ( ae EXPERIENCE Introduction To illustrate our wide experience in projects having similarities with the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment, we have selected the five following projects. These projects, all located in Alaska, are state of the art studies directly related to the Bethel proposal. 1) Black Bear Lake Project. A reconnaissance study of the energy alternatives on Prince of Wales Island was followed by a feasibility study, a FERC License Application and a contract for design. Done for the Alaska Power Authority, it provides us with a complete understanding of APA procedures. 2) Northwest Alaska Coal Resources Assessment. The study examined the potential coal sources, and developed feasibility scenarios for development and utilization of coal as power and heat sources for villages. 3) District Heating Project. The heating system utilizes steam from the existing turbines to heat homes in downtown Fairbanks. The distribution system is a mile in length. 4) Single Wire Ground Return Transmission Line. A transmission line approximately eleven miles long to connect the villages of Kobuk and Shungnak was studied. 5) Co-generation Project. The installation of a third turbine generator at the University of Alaska was studied to maximize electrical generation and district heating. Project Name: Black Bear Lake Project Date of Completion: December 1981 Location of Project: Prince of Wales Island, Alaska Contract Cost: $700,000 Client: Alaska Power Authority 334 West Fifth Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Person to contact: Mr. Brent Petrie Project Manager Tel: (907) 276-0001 Description of Project Scope In 1979, Harza Engineering Company performed a reconnaissance study of the energy alternatives available on Prince of Wales Island. Specific recommendations were made to conduct a feasibi- lity study on the use of wood waste produced by the Alaska Timber Corporation, and on the Black Bear Lake hydropower potential. In May 1980, a contract was signed between the Alaska Power Authority and Harza Engineering Company to undertake a feasibility study and a FERC License Application for the Black Bear Lake Project. The scope of the feasibility study included the following work items: ° Assess the energy balance of the villages of Craig, Klawock, and Hydaburg; the future economic activities and electricity demand; and the load characteristics of the interconnected system. ° Determine the economic feasibility of interconnecting the villages of Hollis and Thorne Bay. ° Determine the optimal plan for developing the hydroelectric potential of Black Bear Lake. ° Compare the selected plan for Black Bear Lake development with all alternative means of satisfying market area power needs. These alternatives include: - continuation of diesel generation, - wood-waste use at the Alaska Timber Corporation, - potential for coal and wind generation, - interconnection with Ketchikan, - conservation and load management measures. La ° Determine the nature and extent of environmental and social impacts of the hydropower project, along with those mitigating measures that could be taken to minimize or offset adverse impact. ° Determine the estimated annual system power costs both with and without the hydropower project, and assess power marketa- bility. ° Fully coordinate project studies with all interested federal, state and local entities and with the general public. All electric power in the project area is now generated by diesel-electric units. Klawock is served by the Tlingit and Haida Regional Electrical Authority (THREA), a rural electric utility. Craig and Hydaburg are served by the Alaska Power and Telephone Company (APT), an investor owned utility. The current peak demand is about 2,000 kW for the three villages. Plans are underway to develop the forest products industry and the fisheries. As a result, an electric demand of 6 MW is forecasted for the early 1990's. A “base case" plan was developed resulting from a continua- | tion of diesel generation, and secondary energy available from the Alaska Timber Corporation (ATC). To use its abundant supply of wood waste from its sawmill operation, ATC purchased, in 1977, equipment from the U.S. Army. ATC is now installing one 2-MW unit, and has entered a contract with THREA to sell secondary energy to Klawock. An appraisal of the energy cost from the ATC plan was performed. Design for an intertie between the mill and the village is underway. The "alternative" plans included the comparison of two hydropower sites. Key Members of the Project Team: Project Manager K. Leonardson Harza Engineering Co. Planning Engineer G. Kocian Harza Engineering Co. Energy Resources Economist B. Trouille Harza Engineering Co. Geologist D.C. Frey Harza Engineering Co. Environmental Scientists J.H. Thrall Harza Engineering Co. J.P. Robinson Harza Engineering Co. Project Name: Assessment of the Feasibility of Utilization of the Coal Resources of Northwestern Alaska for Space Heating and Electricity. Date of Completion: 1981 Location of Project: Seward Peninsula and Norton Sound Coast Contract Cost: $117,000 Client: Alaska Power Authority 334 West Fifth Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Person to Contact: Brent Petrie Project Manager Tel: (907) 276-0001 Description of Project Scope To promote the energy self-sufficiency of northwest Alaska, the Alaska Power Authority contracted with Dames & Moore in August 1980 to assess the extent and quality of, as well as the socioeconomic practicability of developing, the coal resources of northwest Alaska. The work was divided into two phases. Phase l, completed in December 1980, consisted of two major tasks: ° Determine existing fuel utilization rates and patterns by villages within the study area, and ° Identify coal resources in northwest Alaska that may be suitable substitutes for petroleum-based fuels in village electrical and heating applications. The data developed in Phase 1 were used as a basis for Phase 2, which consisted of the following four tasks: ° Develop criteria regarding power plant or space heating fuel requirements from a quality (Btu) and quantity (annual tons of coal) standpoint. ° Select coal prospects which, based on available data, meet these criteria. ° Develop alternative transportation modes from supply to demand points. . ° Develop the alternative supply/demand scenarios relevant to villages or regions, and assess their feasibility and practicability in light of sociostrategic and technical considerations. The study concluded that it appears feasible to supply the space heat needs for the majority of the study area with coal. This would eliminate the need for 5.6 million gallons of diesel fuel annually by the year 2000. Electrical power can also be economically supplied by coal in the larger communities of CT Co Kotzebue, Nome, Unalakleet, and possibly Selawik. Key Members of the Project Team Paul Neff (Project Manager) Dames & Moore Pam Knoede Dames & Moore Jeff Kroft Dames & Moore Marvin Feldman Dames & Moore -2- aad = C02 Co sh ( Project Name: Fairbanks, Alaska, District Heating Hot Water System Demonstration Project Date of Completion: Design Complete Location of Project: Fairbanks, Alaska Contract Cost: $2,500,000 budget Client: City of Fairbanks Contact: John C. Phillips City Engineer City of Fairbanks 410 Cushman Street Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 (907) 452-2881 Description of Project The City Council requested the work be accomplished by the team of Acres American, Stefano & Associates, and Stutzmann Engi- neering Associates. Responsibility by each firm was as follows: Stefano and Associates was responsible for mechanical and electrical engineering; Stutzmann Engineering was for civil engi- neering and land surveying; Acres American was the project Manager. The heating system design utilized the extraction of 50 psi steam from existing turbines one, two, and three. These units are automatic extraction units that use water cooled surface conden- sers for heat rejection at all turbine loads. The more extraction steam that can be used, the less heat rejected into the conden- ser. Obviously, maximizing extraction steam to heat homes and structures in a district heating system will conserve energy, provide heat for homes, and reduce "ice fog" in mid-winter. The distribution system is a conventional two-pipe supply and return with expansion loops. One portion of the system utilizes European design with thin wall pipe and no provision for expan- sion. The distribution system is a mile in length with a major end-user load at its most distant point from the heat source in the plant. The design is based on 400 gallon per minute (GPM) i. poy at c flow in winter, 200 GPM in the summer. Two pumps interlocked for stand-by operation automatically. The circulating pumps pump through a steam to water heat exchanger with automatic steam valve temperature controls. A control panel monitoring all functions of the system with annunciation to the existing power plant control room. Homes and structures are provided a double heat exchanger for domestic and heating water with controls metering and inter-con- nection to the existing heating plant for stand-by operation. The hot water district heating system is expected to have a useful life of forty years. The existing downtown steam distri- bution system, portions of which were designed by Stefano & Asso- ciates twenty years ago, are still in operation. Key Members of the Project Team Ralph R. Stefano, P. E. Stefano & Associates Paul E. Stutzmann, P. E. Stefano & Associates Boyd Brownfield, P. E. Stefano & Associates Michael J. Hobson Stefano & Associates Project Name: Single Wire Ground Return (SWGR) Transmission Line Demonstration Project Date of Completion: December 1981 Location of Project: Kobuk, Alaska Contract Cost: $535,000.00 Client: Contacts: State of Alaska Dept. of Commerce and Economic Development Division of Energy and Power Development Dale Rusnell State of Alaska Division of Energy and Power Development 338 Denali Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (907) 276-0508 Description of the Project The 1979 Alaska State Legislature funded two projects to demonstrate the feasibility of the Single Wire Ground Return con- cept as a alternative method of transmission line construction in arctic regions of Alaska. The subject project, designed by Thomas D. Humphrey, involved a transmission line approximately eleven miles long to connect the villages of Kobuk and Shungnak. These villages are located in a continuous permafrost area North of the Arctic Circle 150 miles due East of Kotzebue. Elements of this project included: 1) 2) 3) 4) demonstrate an overall regional electrification concept as technically and economically feasible. demonstrate a regional fuel consumption reduction per capita through connection of a central station genera- tion into a low cost transmission grid; improve the quality of electric service to isolated communities; demonstrate the solution of special engineering tasks related to the SWGR concept in permafrost regions; 5) demonstrate the availability, interest and use of maxi- mum local labor in the construction and operation of a reliable, electric transmission system; 6) provide a nucleus system for potential regional expan- f sion using longer SWGR lines at higher voltages supplied by more economic central station generation; ; 7) demonstrate the low-cost SWGR concept for application in 14 other remote regions of Alaska. Thomas D. Humphrey, P.E. Stefano & Associates Co fo to Project Name: University of Alaska 10 MW Turbine Generator #3, Addition Date of Completion: 1981, with final load testing occurring October 15, 1981 Contract Cost: $5,750,000 Client: University of Alaska Heating Corporation Contact: Gerald England, Plant Superintendent John E. Nickles, Contracting Officer University of Alaska Power Plant Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 (907) 479-7351 or 479-7040 Description of Project Stefano and Associates was retained to design the third steam “turbine generator installation and purchase of the major items of equipment, including turbine generator, switchgear, vacuum air condenser and 66 inch diameter exhaust duct. Design followed as manufacturer's information became available with construction occurring in two separate contracts over two construction seasons. The turbine was synchronized into the plant distribution system in April, 1981. The use of turbine with automatic extraction for district heating and the capability to maximize electrical generation simultaneously with an environmentally acceptable air condenser that does not develop "ice for" under the severe winter conditions in Fairbanks, yet permits maximum generation under summer light district heating loads represents the latest state of the art in co-generation with Golden Valley Electric Association and district heating. Final load test for the turbine generator is scheduled for the end of October when ambient air temperatures are depressed. Key Members of the Project Team Ralph R. Stefano Stefano & Associates Co GEOGRAPHICAL EXPERIENCE Harza Engineering Company Harza's experience with Alaskan conditions includes the com- pletion of a FERC Inspection Report of the Cooper Lake Project, in 1978, for the Chugach Electric Association, Inc. It was followed by the study of alternatives for providing protection to the upstream face of the embankment and instrumentation for the dam. Harza prepared contract drawings and specifications, and provided a resident engineer during construction. In 1979, Harza prepared a plan of study for development of the hydroelectric potential of the Upper Susitna Basin. Through our current Feasibility Study and FERC License Application for the Black Bear Lake Project, Harza is familiar with the Alaska Power Authority and the state regulatory and environmental agencies. Harza has significant hydroelectric project experience out- side of Alaska in similar cold climate regions of North America and Iceland. This experience includes design of nine projects in Canada, ranging from 18 to 300 feet in head, and design of the Burfell and Hrauneyjafoss projects in Iceland. Special design features to resolve ice jamming and frazil ice problems were successfully incorporated into the Iceland projects. Harza also has planned hydroelectric developments on the Mi- chipicoten and Montreal Rivers in Canada, which entailed eight generating stations ranging from 10 to 64.5 MW. Master planning for power development on the Thjorsa and Hvita Rivers in Iceland was performed by Harza in 1960 prior to beginning project planning for the Burfell project. This cold region experience in hydro- electric project planning and design will be applied as needed to the evaluation of the hydroelectric potential of the Kisaralik River Project. As a leading international consulting firm in the planning and development of power resources, Harza routinely seeks and develops effective working relationships with firms that have extensive and relevant experience with local conditions. Our association with Stefano & Associates, Arctic Environmetal Infor- Mation and Data Center (AEIDC), Dames & Moore, Harding & Lawson, Nunam Kitlutsisti, and Jacobs Associates for the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment will provide relevant comprehensive and specialized geographical experience to the Alaska Power Authority for this study. Stephano and Associates Stephano and Associates was founded in 1957 with its initial office located in Fairbanks. The firm has been involved with the study, design and installation of thirty power boilers and more than 80 MW of generation within the state of Alaska. The firm is also recognized for its work in design and construction management for installation of diesel generation in remote areas of the state. In Bethel, the firm was responsible for the design of mechanical and electrical systems of some buildings. Current energy projects in Alaska an economic study and conceptual energy conversion plant from oil to coal for Govora Corporation, a 10 MW steam turbine generator utilizing an environmentally acceptable steam vacuum condenser for the University of Alaska, and a waste heat recovery project utilizing 50 psi turbine extraction steam at the City of Fairbanks Municipal powerplant to provide hot water district heating for residence, schools and commercial buildings. The other members of the team have also a wide experience in the study area. Thomas D. Humphrey participated in the Northwest Alaska Small Hydropower Reconnaissance Study, in educational facilities and power generation for the Lower Kuskokwin School District, and in the Single Wire Ground Return Project between the villages of Kobuk and Shungnak. Mark A. Newel, the wind energy specialist, has worked on many Alaskan village energy studies and community planning. Having designed a wind generator intertie for the Bethel National Guard Armory, he is very familiar with the area. In the Yukon Kuskokwim Delta, he has designed systems for Pilot Station, Sheldon Point, and Chevak. This local experience, coupled with over a dozen working wind projects in the State, makes him well suited for performing accurate construction cost estimates. His work in village and regional wind energy analysis is highlighted by recent work on the Bristol Bay Regional Power Plan, and a village scale ‘ integrated energy system for the Norton Sound Area. James A. Barkshire, the solar designer, has considerable practical experience in Alaska. He recently wrote a solar green- house manual for Alaska. He was responsible for the solar analy- sis at the Bethel Senior Center building, and many other solar studies and architectural designs in Anchorage, Chugiak, Wasilla, Kodiak. Ralph R. Darbyshire completed a comprehensive plan for the City of Bethel in October 1980. The project elements included: C 4} community attitudinal and socio-economic surveys and analyses; physical and natural resources inventories and analyses; projections of future economic development; and a plan implementa- tion strategy. He has also developed a series of community pro- files for six villages located in the upper Tanana Region of Alaska. He has prepared land managment programs for the Bethel Native Corporation, and other native corporations. He developed the Yukon-Kuskokwim Coastal Resource Service Area Work Program. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center Much of the geographic experience gained by specific staff members, and AEIDC as a whole, has been in western Alaska-- some of it on projects similar to this one. AEIDC had the responsibi- lity for overseeing the disbursement of legislatively appropriated funds to Nunam Kitlutsisti to be used to gather, produce, and disseminate information on the resources of western Alaska in a Manner relevant to the needs of local residents. As part of a statewide effort, AEIDC has produced a regional profile consisting of an inventory and description of natural resources and systems throughout the Yukon-Kuskokwim region to provide a factual basis for planning the allocation and development of natural resources. Noteworthy in this regard was a separate report prepared by AEIDC on the environmental impacts associated with coal development in the Kukpowruk, Nenana, and Beluga coal fields. Individually, senior staff members have traveled extensively in the delta region and have worked on many resource management projects. David Hickok began his activities in western Alaska in 1964 as resource specialist for the Federal Field Committee and, subsequently, as Sea Grant Director and Director of AEIDC, main- taining on-site familiarity with the region and its activities. David Spencer and Dick Hensel traveled and worked in the region for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service since 1950 and 1970, res- pectively. Spencer spent two decades as the refuge supervisor of national wildlife refuges in Alaska and has flown several thousand hours, operating various types of aircraft in remote areas of Alaska, including the delta area. Dick Hensel has participated in land classification studies on the Nunivak and the Clarence Rhode National Wildlife Refuges (now Yukon Delta National Wildlife Re- fuge) and also served as a special assistant to the Alaska area director of Fish and Wildlife Service. In this latter capacity the FWS was afforded close liaison with regional Native organiza-— tions during implementation of the Alaska Native Land Claims Set- tlement Act. As a geomorphologist, Joseph LaBelle pioneered geologic in- vestigations of aggregate resources in northern Alaska. In con- junction with these studies of distribution of borrow materials, LaBelle extensively studied lands within the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. He also traveled through the area many times subsequently with AEIDC staff members on other research activities including the Tyee and Terror Lake Hydroelectric Projects. William J. Wilson, in addition to his familiarity with nor- thern fish and their habitats, has spent the past two years supervising AEIDC's environmental studies of the proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project on Kodiak Island and has been respon- sible for liaison with private, state, and federal agencies with complex and often conflicting interests. Other staff members have a wide variety of backgrounds and disciplinary specialties. Several have worked extensively for state and federal agencies including the Joint Fish and Wildlife Advisory Team on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. Over the years, AEIDC field investigative teams have had considerable experience and exposure to varied operating condi- tions and can fulfill the requirements regardless of the environ- mental and logistical constraints of the proposed activity. Dames & Moore Dames & Moore opened its Alaska office in Anchorage in 1970. The company's services have spanned the State -- from Ketchikan to Prudhoe Bay, from Fairbanks to Dutch Harbor -- and have ranged from resource inventories to complex environmental impact state- ment and socioeconomic analyses. Dames & Moore evaluated the feasibility of replacing diesel fuel with coal in the Seward Pe- ninsula and Norton Sound Coast, and performed an assessment of the Northwest Alaska Coal resources. Other studies were performed in Western Alaska such as: study of the social and economic impacts of a commercial herring fishery on the villages of the Artic/Yukon/Kuskokwim Area, and design of a barge terminal in Naknek. The firm has performed more than 10 major economic, environmental and technology studies involving oil and gas exploration and development in Alaska. Harding-Lawson Associates The Anchorage office, established in 1969, has provided professional services in soil, permafrost, and foundation engineering, engineering geology and geophysics, seismology, and quality control inspection and testing during construction. Over the years they have worked on many arctic projects throughout Alaska. The scope of services provided on these projects includes field and laboratory investigations of both soil and permafrost conditions, geophysical surveys onshore and offshore, analysis for foundation design and thermal protection of the permafrost, and inspection during construction. Nunam Kitlutsisti Nunam Kitlutsisti was formed in 1973 by the Association of Village Council Presidents (AVCP), the regional nonprofit Yupik Eskimo corporation in the Yukon-Kuskokwin delta region in South- western Alaska, to work specifically on the environmental concerns of the 56 villages in the region. Since its formation, Nunam Kitlutsisti has worked on numerous issues concerning the use of renewable and nonrenewable resources in the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta area. Nunam Kitlutsisti continues to work closely with AVCP, and its member villages on these issues. The size of the Nunam Kit- lutsisti staff has gradually increased over the years as the en- vironmetnal issues facing delta residents have become more nume- rous and complicated. The central philosophy of Nunam Kitlutsisti, established by its Board of Directors, is that the villagers in the AVCP region should effectively participate in any decisions made which affect the regions renewable and nonrenewable resources. Thus, the orga- nization's goal is to provide information to the villages and their elected bodies about decisions being made in regards to their resources so that they can become involved in that process. Among the ways that this public information campaign is accomplished are: weekly television and radio shows; direct mailings; the employment of seven local village residents whose task is to visit all local villages at least five times a year with relevant information; organizational and administrative support for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game Advisory Committee in the region; and organizing visits to the village by representatives for state, and federal agencies, private individuals, and companies who are making decisions about the land and its resources. Nunam Kitlutsisti's activities related to the use of renew- able and nonrenewable resources in the delta region can be broken into 6 main sub-categories: Fisheries. Nunam Kitlutsisti monitors federal and state fish regulatory and legislative policies affecting the delta so that villagers are able to make comments in this formulation stage. They have also provided information to fishermen about improving fish quality; developing fishermen's organizations; working on problems created by the State's limited entry legislation, and helping local villagers become involved in the new fisheries developing in their areas (e.g., herring). Game. Nunam Kitlutsisti monitors federal and state game regulatory and legislative policies, insuring that the villagers actively and effectively participate in these processes. Migratory Waterfowl. Nunam Kitlutsisti has been provi- ding information to the villages and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service concerning the problem of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act's prohibition against the taking of migratory waterfowl in the spring by Alaska Natives. Marine Mammals. Nunam Kitlutsisti provides information to the Eskimo Walrus Commission, the U.S. Department of the Interior and ADF&G concerning the present federal Marine Mammals Protection Act's exemption for Alaska Natives from the prohibition of hunting marine mammals. Energy. Nunam Kitlutsisti is providing information to the villages on energy conservation and alternative energy systems. Land. Nunam Kitlutsisti has monitored state and federal Tand regulations and statutes. Among the state issues about which Nunam Kitlutsisti has informed the villagers are the homestead provisions, the area's newly elected Coastal Resource area board; and the State's near shore oil and gas leasing schedule. Among the federal issues about which Nunam Kitlutsisti has kept the villages informed are the national interest lands legislation (d- 2), the Marine Sanctuary Act, the Submerged Lands Act, Coastal Zone Management, and the Federal Outer Continen- tal Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing schedule for the next five years. Jacobs Associates Jacobs Associates of San Francisco, established in 1956, is a firm of consulting construction engineers providing services to, engineers, contractors and owners that relate to heavy construction projects. They have acted as construction advisor to the owner on the Green Lake Hydroelectric Project near Sitka, Alaska in addition to preparation of the construction cost : estimate for the Snettisham Power Project, Alaska. Other Alaska experience includes construction cost estimating and scheduling for the marine work at Valdez oil terminal and cost estimating for the installation of modules on the North Slope at Prudhoe Bay. PROJECT MANAGER Harza Project Management Management Approach The Harza Project Manager is responsible for achieving the client's goals within budget and on schedule, and for providing the leadership for all phases of project execution. The Project Manager organizes and directs the project from the onset; beginning with the development of technical scope, budgets and schedules for the proposal. The Project Manager selects a project team of lead engineers and scientists with relevant geographic and specialized technical capability and experience to provide the client with a well qualified project team. The technical work, scope, budgets and schedules are developed by the designated lead technical personnel in consultation with the Project Manager. The Project Manager directs and controls execution of the work primarily through interaction with these lead technical personnel. The Project Manager and lead personnel represent the management team responsible for control of project execution and successful accomplishment of all objectives. The Project Manager maintains close communication and relations with the client throughout the project. The designated project manager for the client is kept advised on a regular basis of work progress and the status of budget expenditures. Interface with local, state and federal government agencies is closely coordinated with the client project manager. Technical, permitting and other issues are brought to the client's attention on a timely basis to enable the client to provide input and/or make decisions as may be appropriate. Work Planning and Review Form (WP&R) The WP&R form is a basic document designed to help individuals and small groups at all levels to plan and control their assigned tasks with respect to technical requirements, man- hour budgets, schedule, and work plan. Use of the form is designed to promote clear task definition and to increase productivity and efficiency through pre-planning. The WP&R form also provides timely "project status" and "plan to complete" information which enables the project management staff to be continuously aware of project progress and to plan manpower requirements. Most of all, it enables each employee to plan his/her own work and thus allows each person to participate in setting goals and to monitor achievements. The responsibility for initiating and maintaining the WP&R system rests with the Lead Engineers on each phase. Project Progress Report (PPR) The PPR form is the instrument used for reporting actual work progress to the Project Manager. Once a week the Lead Engineers will visit with each person to whom he has issued a work package to obtain the progress figures for the previous week and the estimate for the upcoming week. There is no need to reproduce any forms and this person to person contact promotes the communica- tion required to keep abreast of the work. The Project Manager will collect a summary of these reports every two weeks to monitor the overall project status. Financial Control Harza carefully controls project man-hours and direct costs. Our Administration Services Department assists the Project Manager and Department Heads to ensure that projects are completed on time and within budget. Computer printouts supplied by Harza's project control system provide the Project Management team with bi-weekly readouts of accumulative manpower usage (personnel and time). Also, a monthly financial-expenditure summary and estimate of progress is prepared to aid overall surveillance. Finally, progress completion and accumulated cost diagrams are provided monthly to allow a quick visual display of performance. Study Project Management Project Manager Harza has assigned reponsibility for the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment to Mr. Paul S. Ford. Mr. Ford is Resident Manager of Harza's Alaska Operations and is currently resident in Harza's Anchorage office. He reports directly to Mr. Richard L. Meagher, Vice President in charge of Harza's Alaska Operations. Mr. Ford will carry out his Project Manager responsibilites primarily from Harza's Anchorage office with appropriate trips to the Bethel area and to Harza's Chicago office as needed to effectively manage the work. Management of work being performed by the firms associated with Harza for the study will be effectively accomplished through the Anchorage offices of Stefano & Associates, AEIDC, Dames & Moore and Harding & Lawson, i ( through the Bethel office of Nunam Kitlutsisti and the San Franciso office of Jacobs Associates. Close liaison with the APA Project Manager as well as with the Calista Regional Corporation and state and federal agencies will be facilitated by Mr. Ford's residence in Anchorage. Close liaison with the Association of Village Council Presidents, Bethel Utilities Corporation, Village Councils and regional agency representatives will be effected by Mr. Ford directing study activities from Bethel for periods of a few days to a week each month of the study duration. In essence, Mr. Ford will be present at the location where he can most effectively accomplish management objectives throughout the duration of the study. Mr. Ford has been managing energy related planning studies and various phases of project development on essentially a continuous basis for the past 12 years. His experience has been oriented towards evaluation of the physical, environmental and socio-economic constraints on the planning and development of energy projects. This emphasis is particularly applicable to this study in view of the critical importance of physical, environmen- tal and socio-economic conditions of the Bethel area to the formulation and assessment of technically viable and economic energy plans. Conceptual designs of appropriate electrical generation and transmission technology must be applicable to and compatible with the unique conditions of the study area to arrive at realistic cost estimates and viable plans for economic analysis. Mr. Ford's experience with a broad range of energy technology and resource development coupled with his experience in assessing the compatibility of energy projects with physical, environmental and socio-economic conditions make him ideally suited to provide leadership as Project Manager for this study. During the 20 years of his professional career, Mr. Ford's career interests have evolved to project management of the planning, design and construction management of complex and/or large projects. He is experienced at the management of a broad range of technical disciplines and directing the activities of a project team with multiple interfaces among firms. In addition, he is knowledgeable of various planning techniques (such as decision analysis, computerized planning systems and group decision methods) in performing and managing planning studies. His skills as a Project Manager have been enhanced by attending seminars dealing with project management techniques and by developing a keen appreciation of personal relationships through business development activities. Mr. Ford's past experience is fully presented in Exhibit 1. The following assignments most directly address his qualifications to manage this study: °o Project Manager for alternative energy, need for power, alternative site analysis, site physical, environmental, and socio-economic studies and site-related license applications to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the 1100 MW Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Burlington, Kansas. The 12,500 acre site with a 5,000 acre off-channel cooling reservoir was successfully licensed and is currently well along in construction as the first nuclear plant in Kansas. Project Management involved coordinating the activities of four subconsul- tants, interfacing with two design engineering firms, coordination with consulting firms on three sites in three different states (the plant was a standard design for meeting site-related safety and environmental criteria at four separate locations), public involvement meetings, and public, NRC and Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguard hearings. Project Manager for a confidential reconnaissance feasibility study of a potential 50 MW hydroelectric | project in Washington. The project involved development of about 320 foot of head on a river under study as a potential Wild and Scenic River. Economic analysis of the project feasibility was based on substitution for the projected cost of nuclear energy currently in the utilities 20-year plan. Project Manager/Engineer for energy related projects involving coal, nuclear, oil and geothermal energy and consisting of technical, environmental and economic assessments as follows: Site selection studies for a 1200 MW Coal Plant in Illinois. Site selection studies for a 3200 MW Coal Plant in Michigan. Site selection studies for the 2200 MW Clinton Nuclear Plant in Illinois. Geothermal Resource Evaluation Planning in Washington, Idaho and California. Environmental Impact Statement for Prudhoe Bay Waterflooding Project, Alaska. Management Plan Mr. Ford will be directly responsible to the Alaska Power Authority for carrying out the tasks in the work plan. He will be responsible for the activities of the project team and in direct charge of the Lead Engineers and Scientists with respect to work planning, scheduling, budgeting and reporting. He will monitor the study activities in these respects and take corrective actions where needed to meet technical, schedule, budget and reporting requirements of the study. Mr. Ford will be held accountable for study performance, including "on time" completion within budget limits. It is anticipated that the work plan will undergo modification during the study with redirection of technical and budget resources to critical tasks in order to maintain a balanced program of assessment of all viable alternatives. This alternative energy assessment will be dynamic in technical scope. Interim study results must be assessed and the conclusions made must be factored into the work plan as the study progresses in order to successfully meet the overall objectives of the study. To accomplish this in an orderly manner, Mr. Ford will have five Technical Managers reporting directly to him who will be responsible for their respective work plans in the following major categories of study: Energy Use and Demand R.R. Darbyshire Thermal and Other Generation R. Stefano Hydropower Generation V. Tammekivi Environmental and Physical Resources W. Wilson Energy Supply Plans L.D. Nichol These Technical Managers will also be responsible for budgets, scheduling and reporting and will be held accountable for performance in their area of responsibility. They will initiate and manage work on specific tasks within their assigned responsibilities and be accountable to the Project Manager for the successful completion of these tasks. Mr. Ford will interact with the Technical Managers closely throughout the study; however formal reporting and group Management meetings will be conducted by the Project Manager on a scheduled basis as follows: ° Informal discussions of work progress will be held with each Technical Manager and other appropriate team members on a minimum weekly basis to monitor progress and to expedite management actions. ° A summary written monthly progress report will be submitted by each Technical Manager addressing the status of work progress, budget and schedule specifically for each work task. Interim task results and conclusions which are pertinent to study programming will be itemized and related to budget and schedule estimates for completion of each task. These reports will be used by the Project Manager to effect scoping changes on a timely basis with the APA Project Manager and Technical Managers and to monitor performance of each task. oO A series of four (bi-monthly) group meetings are planned for the APA Project Manager, the Harza Project Manager, Technical Managers and other appropriate team members for the purposes of: 1) integrating task results, 2) assessing the achievement of task and study objectives, and 3) making adjustments in the work plan, budget and schedule as required to maintain a consistent level of confidence in energy supply plan costs, technical feasibility, resource availability and environmental impact. These meetings will be coordinated with public participation and other required meetings to maximize their usefulness and minimize travel costs. Mr. Ford will utilize the Project Progress Report and the financial control computer printouts previously described under Harza Project Management to control actual expenditures of labor hours and direct costs relative to planned expenditures. He will _also maintain a working PERT Schedule of the study tasks and subtasks, meetings, reporting and other activities as shown in Section H, Schedule. The PERT Schedule will be updated and distributed to the Technical Managers on an as-needed basis for their use and reference to the overall study progress and plan. To facilitate communication among team members, a formal study plan will be issued to all Managers and Lead Engineers and Scientists which will include the following: Management and Contractural Responsibilities Project Team Organization and Communication Channels Work Plan & PERT Schedule Reporting and Communication Procedures ooo0o°o This study plan will be updated with revisions at necessary intervals to keep all lead team members informed of the current status of the study plan. Date of Birth: Citizenship: Degrees: Professional Registrations: Professional Societies: July 1981 to Date: 1976 to July 1981: HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY PAUL S. FORD Senior Geotechnical Engineer Resident Manager - Alaska Operations September 24, 1936 U.S.A. Master of Science in Civil Engineering 1963, University of Illinois Bachelor of Arts in Physics and Mathematics 1961, Monmouth College Professional Engineer - Idaho, Illinois, Oregon, Washington American Society of Civil Engineers International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundations National Society of Professional Engineers Washington Society of Professional Engineers Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Senior Geotechnical Engineer. Responsible for resident client and project liaison and business development in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest. Lead Geotechnical Engineer for design phase geotechnical investigation of 75 MW Summer Falls Project in eastern Washington. Dames & Moore, Seattle, Washington. Partner. Project Manager of reconnaissance feasibility study of 50 MW hydroelectric project in eastern Washington. Project Manager of geotechnical evaluation for feasibility study of the 10 MW Sandy Creek hydroelectric project in western Washington for Puget Sound Power & Light Company. Project Manager for geohydrologic studies of alternative methods of flood protection for the Regional Water Treatment Plant, City of Anacortes, Washington. Project Manager for geotechnical and hydraulic engineering and slope protection design of waterfront development from Mt. St. Helens dredge spoils in Columbia River for Weyerhauser Company. PAUL S. FORD -2- Senior Geotechnical Engineer Resident Manager - Alaska Operations 1976 to July 1981: (Continued) 1968 to 1975: " Senior Engineer for EIS on water flood project at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska for Alaska District, Corps of Engineers. Project Manager for marine biology water quality, flood retention, marine land fill, docking facilities and dredging studies in Puget Sound and on the Columbia River, Washington. Project Manager for site selection and alternate site comparison for major wood products plant in Minnesota and Michigan for Weyerhauser Company. Project Manager for land status, EIS permitting and planning of geologic exploration program for potential geothermal resources in Washington, Idaho, Oregon and California. Project Manager for planning and design of stabilization of four major landslides in Washington and Idaho. Consultation on marine landfill and foundation problems in Valdez and Sitka, Alaska. Client and Technical Advisor for environmental monitoring and licensing studies of 2200 MW Skagit Nuclear Power Plant site in Washington. Dames & Moore, Chicago, Illinois. Staff Engineer to Partner. Project Manager for planning and design of Lake Mashkenode Dam, canal and control works for water supply at the U.S.. Steel tactonite plant in Minnesota. Project Manager for Environmental Report, site portion of Safety Analysis Report, licensing support and geotechnical design investigations and recommendations for 1100 MW Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant in Kansas, involving 5,000 acres off channel cooling reservoir with major earthworks for development of a 12,500 acre site. Project Manager for geohydrologic, foundation engineering, wave protection designs at Unit 2 of Enrico Fermi Nuclear Plant in Michigan and alternate site studies, site safety analysis report, environmental report and geotechnical design recommendations for 2200 MW La. Salle Nuclear Plant in Illinois. PAUL S. FORD -3- Senior Geotechnical Engineer Resident Manager - Alaska Operations 1968 to 1975: (Continued) 1967 to 1968: 1963 to 1967: November 1981 29006 Project Manager for planning through construction management of 25 acre land reclamation project in Hudson River, New York. Project Manager for site selection studies for 1600 MW to 3200 MW coal fueled power plant sites in Illinois and Michigan and 2200 MW nuclear plant site in Illinois, Project Manager for numerous foundation engineering studies for many types of facilities in 15 states. Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Shift Engineer in charge at Upper Reservoir, Kinzua Pumped-Storage Project, Pennsylvania. Supervised engineering staff monitoring of upper reservoir and shaft construction. Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Civil Design Engineer. Performed design and construction phase geotechnical studies of the 1,200,000 cfs Mangla Spillway in West Pakistan, of Angat Dam and Dike in the Philippines, of Mossyrock and Mayfield hydroelectric projects in Washington, of the Brokopondo project in Suriname, and other water supply and hydroelectric dam projects. PROJECT TEAM Company Relationship Harza Engineering Company is the Prime Contractor for the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment. Harza will be the signatory to the Contract with the Alaska Power Authority (APA) and be lead firm providing overall direction of the work. The firms associated with Harza and the lines of communication among the firms for the proposed study are discussed in the Capabilities Section of this proposal. Project Team The organization of the project team was developed to accom- plish the work plan and schedule set forth in subsequent sections. The principle which guided the development of the our organization is our intention to provide the APA and the residents of the study area with quality service in the least time at the least cost. As described earlier, the Project Manager has overall respon- sibility for the management, direction, and technical quality of the work. It is his responsibility to keep the Project on sche- dule, within budget, and to assure that it is adequately staffed with the proper level of engineering expertise. Within each firm study tasks will be guided by Technical Managers. The Technical Managers are assisted by Lead Engineers and Scientists of the various disciplines. The Project Organization Chart is shown on Exhibit 1 and Key Personnel for the project team are listed following the organization chart. KEY PERSONNELL/ Position Project Manager Public and Agency Participation Advisory Group Agencies Villages Bethel Region Review and Advisory Group Energy Planning Thermal Generation Environmental Impact Cost Estimating Energy Use and Demand Community Planner Community Planner Economist Energy Resources Economist Electrical Engineer Electrical Engineer Electric Power Systems Engineer Thermal and Other Generation Mechanical Engineer Fuel Resources Economist Fuel Resources Economist Senior Minerals Economist Steam Generation Design and Waste Heat Recapture Mechanical Engineer Wind Energy Engineer * * + * + * * Can «dat P. S. Ford R. J. Hensel H. Sparck H. H. Chen V. P. Norkus J. H. Thrall J. W. Nichols R. R. Darbyshire W. L. Hanley S. M. Fellows B. Trouville (Lead) T. D. Humphrey D. A. Lyons P. J. Donalek R.R Stefano M. L. Feldman (Lead) W. W. Wade DJ. Kroft J. S..Miller (Lead) D. F. Healy M. A. Newell (Lead) 1/ An asterick (*) is used to designate Alaska Residents. 2/ To be assigned in agreement with APA. KEY PERSONNEL (cont'd) Position Candidate Solar Energy Engineer Chemical Engineer Environmental Impact Air Water Water Hydropower Generation Planning Engineer Planning Engineer Planning Engineer Hydrologist Hydrologist Climatologist Geologist Geologist Geologist / Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Engineer Mechanical Engineer -Electrical Engineer Transmission Engineer Cost Estimator Cost Estimator Environmental and Physical Resources Environmental Scientist Environmental Impact Analyst Wildlife Biologist Wildlife Biologist Wildlife Biologist Fisheries Biologist Fisheries Biologist Geomorphologist Archaeologist * + OF + * tt ee He He OF A. Barkshsire A. Bartick Y. Lou (Lead) W. Morsell E. Hemming Tammekivi L. Wang F. Carter K. Lee Jawed (Lead) L. Wise (Lead) C. Acker A. Paige (Lead) A. Johnson E. Kleiner G. Oechsel (Lead) M. England L. Miller W. Fazalare C. Aberer Talgar Levy (Lead) M. Petrofsky J. Wilson P. Robinson (Lead) Cuccarese L. Spencer E. Trudgen D. Kelly G. Thiele Cc. LaBelle Ardnt —_—— _s : 4 —7 e—— ——- rey, —~ KEY PERSONNEL (cont'd) Position Candidate Energy Supply Plans Planning Engineer L. D. Nichol Community Planner * R. R. Darbyshire Economist S. Fellows (Lead) Energy Resources Economist B. Trouille Electrical Engineer * T, D. Humphrey Electrical Engineer * D. A. Lyons Electrical Power Systems Engineer P. J. Donalek Fifty-four members have been proposed to participate in the feasibility assessment, of these twenty-eight are Alaska Residents. Detailed resumes of these Key Personnel follow in alphabetical order at the end of this section. Capsule resumes of key project staff members follow. PROJECT LEAD STAFF Project Manager, Paul S. Ford Resident Manager, Alaska Operations, Harza Mr. Ford has been managing energy related planning studies and various phases of project development for the past 12 years. His assignments have covered a broad range of energy technologies and resource developments coupled with experience in assessing the compatibility of energy projects with physical, environmental and socio-economic conditions. Mr. Ford's past experience is fully presented in the "Project Manager" section, Tab (E). —- ees fe Se — Ge we PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION ADVISORY GROUP Government Agency Coordinator, Richard J. Hensel Adjunct Associate in Wildlife Biology, AEIDC Mr. Hensel will serve both as the primary contact with state and federal agencies and as the lead wildlife biologist for the study. He has a B.S. in Wildlife Biology and has 24 years of experience working with Alaskan Wildlife and wildlife agencies. In his position at AEIDC, he maintains comprehensive, up-to-date knowledge of sources of information on biotic resources of Alaska and maintains first-hand knowledge of these resources, their use by man, and factors that affect them. He participated in the recent assessment of environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility on Kodiak Island, Alaska. While with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sevice prior to joining AEIDC, he participated in land classifica- tion studies on the Nunivak and the Clarence Rhode National Wild- life Refuges (now the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge) and also served for two years as a special assistant to the Alaska area director of Fish and Wildlife Service to provide close liai- son with regional Native organizations during implementations of the Alaska Native Land Claims Settlement Act. Much of this time was spent in the Bethel area. Village Participation Coordinator, Harold Sparck Director of Nunam Kitlutsisti Mr. Sparck has been the director of Nunam Kitlutsisti since its formation in March of 1973. He holds a B.S. from George Wash- ington University and a M.S. from Antioch College-West. For the past 7 years, he has directed the program pursuant to the directives of the Board of Directors to ensure that the villagers in the region are able to effectively participate in any decisions which affect the regions renewable and nonrenewable resources. Among the organizations with which he has worked closely on fishe- ries and other resource issues are the Alaska Native Foundation, Stonavik Cooperative, the North Pacific Fisheries Management Coun- cil, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, the Alaska Board of Fisheries, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Alaska Fish- eries Foundation, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Agricultural Association, and Fishermen's Associations throughout the region. He has given technical assistance to fishermen wanting to form political and marketing organizations. oa ENERGY USE AND DEMAND Technical Manager, Energy Use and Demand, R. R. Darbyshire President, Darbyshire & Associates The 1980 City of Bethel Comprehensive Plan was prepared for the City by Darbyshire & Associates. Extensive study of the entire community, including the development of an economic computer model make Mr. Darbyshire eminently qualified to take a lead role in the asssessment of energy use and demand. Mr. Darbyshire has major planning experience in villages in other parts of western Alaska. His depth of experience with Bethel will make the critical assessment of updating energy demand an effective process. Lead, Energy Resources Economist, Bruno Trouille Energy Resources Economist, Harza Mr. Trouille will be responsible for economic and technical evaluation of energy alternatives, power and energy forecasts, optimization of hydroelectric power development, and financial and economic studies. Mr. Trouille analyzed the energy alternatives for Prince of Wales Island, Alaska and reviewed historical data and projections to assess future demographic and economic develop- ment of the Black Bear Lake power market area, Alaska. He is presently completing reservoir operation studies, load forecasts, and economic analyses of the Chester Lake Hydroelectric Project, Alaska. THERMAL AND OTHER GENERATION Technical Manager, Thermal and Other Generation, Ralph R. Stefano President and Principal Engineer, Stefano & Associates, Inc. Mr. Stefano has thirty years of experience in Alaska as a consulting engineer on projects involving efficient and effective designs for buildings, utility systems, power plants and other special-function structures for arctic and sub-arctic areas. Waste heat utilization and energy conservation projects have been among the innovative solutions he has developed to resolve envi- ronmental considerations in relation to generation station plant design. Technical and environmental planning for coal fired plants led to the development of the only major coal fired plant combustion and fixed carbon recycling system in Alaska that was able to meet EPA particulate emission standards ten years after initial plant operation. He is also recognized for his work in design and construction managemet for installation of diesel gene- ration and waste heat bottom cycle recapture projects in remote areas of the state. Lead, Fuel Resources Economist, Marvin L. Feldman Economist, Dames & Moore Dr. Feldman has a Ph.D in natural resources economics. He recently completed an assignment as principal investigator for the feasibility assessment of coal resources of northwestern Alaska as a replacement heat and power source in rural villages. Other pertinent assignments have included: ° Development of methodology and socioeconomic assessment of Alaska OCS oil and gas development in the St. George Basin, North Aleutian Shelf, and the Navarin Basin, for the Bureau of Land Management. ° Development of an Environmental Regulations Guide and Program of Assistance to Cogenerators to obtain neces-— sary environmental approvals, sponsored by Pacific Gas & Electric Company. ° Social and economic assessment of impacts of designation of segments of the Kern River under the Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, for U.S. Forest Service. Lead, Steam Generation Design and Waste Heat Recapture, Mr. John S. Miller. Mechanical Engineer, Stefano & Associates Mr. Miller has 40 years of experience in the design and engi- neering supervision of commercial and industrial environmental: systems, process, utility and steam power plants. In association with Stefano & Associates, he participated in the design and ins- tallation of the third steam turbine generator for the University of Alaska. The use of the turbine with automatic extraction for district heating and the capability to maximize electrical generation simultaneously with an environmentally acceptable air condenser that does not develop "ice fog" under the severe winter conditions in Fairbanks, yet permits maximum generation under summer light district heating loads represents the latest state of the art in co-generation with Golden Valley Electric Association and district heating. Lead, Wind Energy Engineer, Mark A. Newell Civil Engineer, Stefano & Associates Mr. Newell is a civil engineer with over six years of expe- rience working with utilities. His broad energy background inclu- des extensive experience in design of systems and structures in remote villages in Alaska. He has worked on village energy stu- dies and community planning, performed detailed designs for con- servation and alternative energy systems, provided construction Management and supervision, start-up assistance, and operation and maintenance training. Particularly pertinent assignments include: o - Unalakleet Electrical Cooperative Wind Farm: 3-l0kwW wind turbines intertied directly into a small diesel grid. ° Sheldon Point Attached Wind Generators-Individual bat- tery systems for entire village using towers attached to piling foundation. ° Pilot Station Wind Energy Project - a battery charging 10 kW wind generator for power in the community building, watering point, library, and jail. Project included: superinsulated battery room, wattmiser fluorescent retrofit, and thermal dumps. 2 CD Co C ° Army National Guard Armorys designed a 2 kW utility intertie for Bethel Armory; a remote battery charger for St. Mary's; a remote battery charger for Elim & Togiak. ° Reconnaissance Study of Energy Alternatives for Shun- gnak, Kiana, and Ambler - for Alaska Power Authority: project manager. ° Alaskan Wind Energy Handbook - authored comprehensive text on design, economics, installaton and maintenance of wind systems in Alaska. Handbook prepared under contract to Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - Research Section. Lead, Air Quality Specialist, George Y. Lou Senior Meteorologist II, Dames & Moore Mr. Lou has extensive experience in climatological, meteoro- logical, and air quality impact assessment sudies for major nu- clear and fossil fuel power plant projects, including environmen- tal report and safety analysis report preparations. He has con- ducted air quality impact evaluations for major petrochemical and oil transportation projects including PSD (Prevention of Signifi- cant Deterioration of Air Quality) permit application prepara- tions. He has also been responsible for site selection studies and meteorological and air quality monitoring network design. HYDROPOWER GENERATION Technical Manager, Hydropower Generation, V. Tammekivi Head, Energy Resources Planning Section, Harza Mr. Tammekivi has an M.S. in Hydraulics and 36 years of experience in the planning and design of numerous hydroelectric developments. Mr. Tammekivi was Project Engineer for the turbine selection studies on the Kootenai River Project, Montana. Other energy planning assignments include the Burfell Hydroelectric Project in Iceland, Snake and Salmon River Hydroelectric Develop- ments in Idaho, and the Uribante and Caroni River Hydroelectric Projects in Venezuela. Mr. Tammekivi will supervise and coordinate the studies per- formed by the engineers in Hydrology, Geology and Geotechnical, Mechanical, Electrical, Transmission and Cost Estimating. Lead, Hydrologist, K. Jawed Senior Hydrologist, Harza Mr. Jawed has 19 years of experience in hydrology. Much of this has been in field collection an analysis of streamflow, sedi- ment, groundwater, and climatic data. Examples are: PMF for Piney Dam (Pennsylvania); flood operation plan, including flood peak and volume frequencies, for Bath County pumped-storage pro- ject (Virginia); design flood for Big Sandy Dam (Kentucky); design and installation of flow- and climate-station network for Guri Dam Project (Venezuela); and installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrometric stations in Pakistan. Lead, Climatologist, James L. Wise Climatologist, AEIDC, Federal/State Climatologist for Alaska Mr. Wise has a M.S. in Meteorology. As state climatologist for Alaska he maintains up-to-date records on the climate of Alaska including copies of weather observation logs, summarizes data publications from the National Climatic Center, and unpublished climate data from the state. He provides climate information in response to requests from individuals, government agencies, and industry, and applies relevant climate information to the solution of practical problems of design, planning, impact assessment, alternate energy use, and related subjects. -10- Lead, Geologist, R. A. Paige Senior Geologist, Harza Mr. Paige has a B.S. in Geology from the University of Alas- ka, and a M.S. in Geology from the University of Washington. In addition to his college time, three of his 26 years of experience were spent in Alaska. He will be responsible for the supervision and review of all assigned project geologic studies. During the past eight years, Mr. Paige has been Resident Geologist on six major hydroelectric projects, including the Uribante Project. Before that, Mr. Paige worked for ten years in the Polar Division of the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory. He specialized in engineering geology problems of snow, ice, and frozen grounds in the polar regions. He has written many articles and technical papers on these problems. Lead, Geotechnical Engineer, R. G. Oechsel Head, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Section, Harza Mr. Oechsel is the principal soils and foundation engineer for the Bath County Pumped-Storaged Project (Virginia). This entails supervision of four soils engineers who participated in the design of the 460 foot high upper reservoir and 135 foot high lower reservoir dams. In addition he supervises the design of access roads, stabilization of rock slopes and preparation of design memos, construction drawings, and specifications. Mr. Oechsel also worked on the Seneca Pumped-Storage Project (Pennsylvania) where he personally supervised preparation of design memos, construction drawings, and specifications. He spent six months in the field during construction of the upper reservoir. Lead, Cost Estimator, L. F. Levy Head, Estimating and Scheduling Section, Harza During his 30 years of experience, Mr. Levy has been involved in all phases of cost estimating and construction management activities. He has prepared construction estimates and schedules for many Harza projects including: Yacyreta, Argentina and Para- guay; Mayfield 4th Unit, Washington; Hadley Falls, Massachusetts; Sullivan Lake, Washington; Foothills, Colorado. -ll- ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES Technical Manager, Environmental and Physical Resources, William J. Wilson, Supervisor Resource Science & Cultural Services Division Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center Mr. Nelson has a M.S. in Fisheries and Wildlife and has worked in Alaska for AEIDC since August 1974. His major interest is in measuring fisheries and aquatic habitat response to hydro- electric developments, placer mining, coal extraction, and logging including hydraulic and aquatic habitat modeling and instream flow assessment. He has spent the past two years supervising AEIDC's environmental studies of the proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project on Kodiak Island and has been responsible for liaison with private, state, and federal agencies with complex and other con- flicting interests. He will direct the basic environmental stu- dies (biotic and physical) for this project and also serve as lead fisheries biologist. Lead, Environmental Impact Analyst, John P. Robinson Aquatic Ecologist/Fisheries Biologist, Harza Mr. Robinson has been responsible as Lead Environmental Scientist on three recent Harza projects, including the feasibili- ty study and FERC application for the Black Bear Lake Hydro- electric Project in Alaska. He has performed resource assessments and ecological impact analyses for hydroelectric and other water development projects in ten states and eight foreign countries. Mr. Robinson is thoroughly knowledgeable of FERC, FWS, Alaskan agency and other environmental permitting and licensing require- ments from experience on the Black Bear Lake Project. On this project, he will integrate the environmental and engineering data bases and provide a detailed evaluation of likely environmental impacts related to each of the identical project alternatives. -12- ENERGY SUPPLY PLANS Technical Manager, Energy Supply Plans, L. D. Nichol Head, Hydroelectric Planning Section, Harza Mr. L. D. Nichol has over 20 years of experience with Harza, primarily in the evaluation of multi-purpose projects. He has directed and coordinated master planning and optimization studies on numerous hydroelectric developments including preparation of selection and screening programs for evaluating alternative sites, levels of development, and power markets. Lead, Economist, S. M. Fellows Economist, Harza Mr. Fellows has 20 years of experience in the development of multi-purpose projects including general economic studies for project evaluation, project plan development and financial repay- ment analyses. In 1977, he was staff economist on the resident planning team for a rural electrification program in Egypt. Du- ties included projecting demands for and the benefits and costs of providing electricity in the rural zones in Egypt. Using socio- economic criteria a priority ranking of each zone was established for use in formulating a phased rehabilitation and expansion pro- gram. -]13- ORGANIZATION CHART » ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY ; PROJECT MANAGER D.W. Baxter PROJECT MANAGER P.S. Ford REVIEW AND ADVISORY GROUP ENERGY PLANNING - H.H. Chen THERMAL GENERATION — _ V.P. Norkus ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT — J.H. Thrall COST ESTIMATING - JW. Nichols PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION ADVISORY GROUP AGENCIES — R. Hensel VILLAGES — JH, Sparck BETHEL REGION * TO BE ASSIGNED IN AGREEMENT WITH APA TECHNICAL | MANAGERS THERMAL AND OTHER HYDROPOWER ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL GENERATION GENERATION RESOURCES R.R. Stefano V. Tammekivi W.S. Wilson ENERGY SUPPLY PLANS L.D. ENERGY USE AND DEMAND R.R. Darbyshire PROFESSIONAL STAFF WITH TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE LEADERS HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY JOSEPH C. ABERER Associate and Assistant Head, Electrical Department | Degrees: Master of Science in Mathematics New York University, 1946 Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, 1941 Professional Engineer — ||linois Professional Society: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1966. Associate, 1978, Assistant Head, Electrical Department |, 1979 to date. Electrical Design Department: Head, Hydro Generation and Substation Section, 1979 to date; Head, Industrial Projects Section, 1976-79; Senior Engineer, 1966-76. Experience Highlights: Responsible for electrical designs, personnel assignments, budget preparation, and scheduling for a number of hydroelectric projects including Hadley Falls, Boundary, and Mayfield, USA; El Nispero, Honduras; San Lorenzo, El Salvador; Magarin and King Talal, Jordan; Tembagapura, Indonesia; and Ullum, Argentina, Other projects include: Puerto Cortes || diesel plant and 138-kv switchyard, Honduras; Rod El Faroq 66-kv substation, Egypt; uprating studies for Cushman and La Grande hydro stations, USA, and other feasibility studies. Responsible for electrical designs, related electrical and instrumentation specifications, drawings, and cost estimates for nine wastewater treatment plants for utility, paper, and steel companies and for the Jeddah Airport in Saudi Arabia, Responsible for electrical design, associated specifications, drawings, and cost estimates for the Hillside and Hanover Park Pumping Stations, Illinois; Washington, D.C. Subway Section; Chicago TARP Mainstream Pumping Station, Illinois; and Calion Navigation Lock and Dam in Arkansas, Lead Engineer for design, plans, specifications, cost estimates, and construction drawings for the 138/69-kV Duncan Substation, Jamaica, and for rehabilitation of electrical facilities and automatic controls in the West-Southwest Sewage Treatment Plant, Illinois. Responsible for the electrical design, including preparation of design memoranda, specification drawings, and cost estimates for the 3-80-MVA units for the Hrauneyjafoss generating station and associated 230-kW SF 6 sub- station, Iceland; and the 25 MVA unit for Andrews generating station, Canada. 1948 to 1966: Garden City Engineering Company, Chicago, IIlinois. 5/81 JOSEPH C. ABERER Manager {6 yrs.) and Electrical Construction Engineer, Electrical Contracting Firm. Estimation and finalization of bid costs, purchasing and direction of construction operations, preparation of construction drawings, and project supervision. 1942 to 1948: Bell Telephone Laboratories, New York, New York, Technical Staff Member. Performed network studies; electrical measurements; testing; design of carrier, pulse, hybrid, and measuring set transformers; preparation of specifications and reports; setting manufacturing limits; and liaison work with Western Electric Company. LIAR ZA encineerinc company RICHARD C. ACKER Associate and Head, Geology Section Degrees: Master of Science in Geology Brown University, 1950 Bachelor of Arts in Geology Williams College, 1947 Languages: English, Working knowledge of French and Spanish Professional Registrations: Professional Geologist No. 1833, California Engineering Geologist No. 576, California Professional Societies: Association of Engineering Geologists Geological Society of America Harza Engineering Company since 1962. Associate, 1975. Geology Section, Head, 1973 to date; Geotechnical Section: Senior Geologist, 1967-73; Indus Basin Division: Geologist, 1966-67; Resident Geologist, West Pakistan, 1962-66. Experience Highlights: Responsible for the work of the Geology Section staffed with approximately 18 engineering geologists. Specific responsbilities include planning, scheduling, direction and review of geologic field and office studies and reports for variety of civil works projects. This work ranges in scope from regional appraisal studies to detailed site studies with emphasis on hydro projects, underground facilities, and related ground-water problems. Some typical projects undertaken by the division include: Reza Shah Kabir Dam, Iran — feasibility, and construction surveillance of 650-foot high arch dam. Nader Shah Dam, Iran — design investigations for 480-foot high rockfill dam. St. Lawrence Basin, New York — appraisal studies of 18 damsites. Blue Mountain Water Supply Project, Jamaica — appraisal and feasibility studies, diversion dams and tunnels. Chicago North Side Rock Tunnel — feasibility investigations, 200 mile rock tunnel complex. Patia River Basin, Colombia — appraisal of 28 damsites, prefeasibility investigation of five damsites, and feasibility study of 660-foot high rockfill dam. Gavin Fly Ash Dam and Reservoir — site selection and design studies for waste retention facility. Strontia Springs Dam, Colo. — feasibility, design studies and construction surveillance for 300-foot high arch dam. Uribante—Caparo Project, Venezuela — feasibility studies of four dams and tunnel complex. RICHARD C. ACKER Responsibilities as Resident Geologist in Lahore, West Pakistan included: furnishing guidance, technical assistance and training to WAPDA group of 22 geologists performing geologic mapping, subsurface and construction aggregates, and preparing geologic reports for feasibility and design of reservoir projects; reviewed geologic investigations and reports by WAPDA and various project consultants on Independent Development Works. Carried out surveillance and review of geological investigations by project consultants as liaison for Harza, Chicago, on Indus Basin projects including Mangla Dam and Tarbela Dam. 1956 to 1962: District Geologist and assistant to Chief, Paving, Foundations and Materials Branch. Responsibilities included: All geologic work relative to siting, foundation and construction aggregates investigations, design, construction and maintenance of structures, paving and water supply for nine military airfields and a widespread radar/communications \ network, mainly in Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; New York, N.Y. 4 1950 to 1956: . “, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Baltimore, Maryland. District Geologist. Responsibilities included: All geologic work in planning, design and construction of dams and aA flood control structures; and in foundation design, construction and water supply for various military installations, investigations and evaluation of rip-rap quarries and construction aggregates. 1947 to 1950: Brown University; Providence, Rhode Island. Graduate Teaching Assistant, Geology Department. b 1948: _ R. T. Vanderbilt, Inc.; Balmat, New York. Geological Assistant to Mine Superintendent. Underground tremolite mining. 1945 to 1946: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. my "1944 to 1945: . U.S. Bureau of Mines; Starlake, New York. : ‘ “A Field Foreman of survey team and Geophysical Field Assistant for strategic minerals investigation. Technical Papers and Articles: “Rock Mechanics Studies for Mossyrock Arch Dam’’ ASCE, Power Journal, January, 1971 co-author with D. E. Kleiner. “Foundation and Abutment Treatment for Rockfill Dams’’ ASCE Journal Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, October 1972 co-author with Jack C. Jones. , “Geologic Aspects of the Chicagoland Flood Control and Pollution Abatement Program” — paper presented at 1972 North American Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Co-author with R. S, LaRusso. 2/80 ARNDT, KATHERINE, Archeologist Soc. .Sec. No. 395-56-2088 Education State University of New York, Binghampton, N.Y., PhD in Anthropology, in progress. PhD program, completed through to dissertation. Dissertation title: Strategies and stratagems--Native Alaskans and the Middle Yukon Fur Trade, 1833-1867. University of Alaska, Fairbanks. M.A. 1977. Major: Anthropology with specialty in Archeology. Thesis title: Structure of cache pits at GULO77--A Late Prehistoric Archeological Site near Gulkana, Alaska. University of Wisconsin, Madison. B.A. 1974. Major (dual): Russian (with honors); Anthropology. Experience Stikine Area Archeologist, Tongass National Forest, Petersburg, Alaska. October 1977 to August 1979. : Archeological clearance job for the University Museum, University of Alaska, on Little Diomede Island and at St. Michael, Alaska. June 1980 to July 1980. Archeological Laboratory Foreman, Field School at Dry Creek, Alaska. Uni- versity of Alaska. June 1977 to September 1977. Field Foreman, Gulkana Archeological Site, Pipeline Salvage Survey. May 1976 to June 1976. Archeological ‘Study at Cloud Lake Archeological Site, Seward Peninsula, ‘ Alaska. University of Alaska, July 1975 to September 1975. Archeological Study, Gulkana Archeological Site, Gulkana, Alaska. May 1975 to June 1975. Laboratory Foreman at Bismarck, N. Dakota. June 1973 to August 1973. Student at Archeological Field School, Bismarck, N. Dakota. June 1972 to August 1972. ° The Renewable Energy Group BACKGROUND Mr. Barkshire is an architec- tual designer with considerable experience in Alaskan specific passive solar construction. He has helped pioneer the use of double walled super insulated buildings in Southcentral Alaska. He has 9 years of field experience in the building construction industry, having worked aS a maSter carpenter, project foreman and construc- tion manager. Mr. Barkshire is currently Vice-president of Wind Systems Engineering, Inc. He brings considerable project coordina- tion and management experience and a vibrant entrepreneurial Spirit. His work as owner of CNL Designs includes historical restoration, architectural de- Sign and superintendant of ur- ban and remote village projects. In his present capa- sity he is responsible for the thermal design, conservation, and solar elements of projects. He is a very capable manager of the production staff including writers, draftmen and layout artists. Mr. Barkshire has considerable practical experience compli- menting his technical knowledge in the use of passive solar gain and thermal mass analysis. He recently wrote a solar greenhouse manual for Alaska, and his research, writing, ed- iting and analysis skills are well developed. He has served as an adjunct Professor at the Anchorage Community College and taught workshops throughout the State on alternative energy. JAMES A. BARKSHIRE SOLAR DESIGNER EDUCATION Anchorage Community College - Construction Management Certificate - Architectural and Engineering Technology - Business Management Highline Community College, WA - Music and Journalism Institute de America's, Mexico - Language, History HONORS Home design Competition Review Committee Technical Review Subcommittee, Alaska Energy Center Energy Advisory Committee - ACC PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Section - International Solar Energy Society Alaskans for Alternative Energy Chairman of the Board _ Construction Specifications Institute - Cook Inlet Chapter EXPERIENCE Mr. Barkshire has served as Vice-President of Wind Systems Engineering and is responsible for the following projects: o Selawik farm project-solar bunkhouse with double log o Pilot Station - watering point and battery building design o Pribilof Island School District - Thermal energy audit for schools at St. Paul and St. George, with complete plan for conservation retro- fit. Includes HP-41C calcula- tor programs and data collec- tion system Mr. Barkshire while a managing principal in Alaska Renewable Energy Associates was responsi- ble for the following projects o Alaska Railbelt Electrical Alternatives Study, Conser- vation Analysis 9 Alternative Energy Overview Workshops in various Alaskan Communities Conservation Analysis, North Pacific Rim Housing Units Solar Analysis, Delta Junc- tion Community College building : Solar Analysis, Bethel Senior Center building Solar Design Analysis, Thompson & Erskine residences Research & consulting, 25 miscellaneous projects ~Architectural Design: °o °o Homer House, Alaska's first passive solar home Reilly Solar tempered homes, Eagle River Stogsdill Solar home, Chugiak Kimball Solar home, Anchorage Frichtal Solar home, Anchorage Weeldryer Solar home, Anchorage Schlief Solar home, Anchorage Woodard Solar home, Anchorage Langston home, Anchorage JAMES A. BARKSHIRE SOLAR DESIGNER PAGE TWO o Gabler Greenhouse, Wasilla o Wills Solar Home, Anchorage o Devers Greenhouse retrofit, Kodiak o Design, Graphics & Construction details for Solar Greenhouses in 17 Alaskan locations o Designer & Construction Coor- dinator for window box Solar Collector and Solar Green- house, Alaska Center for the Environment As owner of CNL Designs, building design and construction management. Major projects include: o Erickson house, Anchorage - design and construction management o Stormy's Restaurant, Unalaska - Architectural design, mate- rials procurement, construc— tion management, field pro- ject superintendent o Bishop's House, Unalaska - Architectural and historical documentation, materials pro- curement, project manager and superintendent, historical retrofit o Design, drawing and project foreman for Roundhouse Builders, geodesic dome con- tractors, Anchorage o Project Foreman and car- penter, various residential buildings, Anchorage ' HERBERT A. BARTICK Muncie, Indiana - February 24, 1932 EDUCATION: B.S. Ch.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette, - Indiana, 1958. Management Training Course, Atlantic Research Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, 1974. _ Practical Cryogenics, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, 1961. Computer Technology and Programming, Wright- Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, 1960. Ballistic Meteorology, Fort Sill, Oklahoma, 1955. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: Commonwealth of Virginia---1958 Alaska Registration Pending PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Institute of Chemical Engineers . Professional Engineers, Virginia Environmental Policy Commission, City of Alexandria (Engineering representative) 1976 to Present: Principal Engineer, Tetra Tech, Inc., Arlington, Virginia; Operations Manager, Energy Management Division. Responsi- ble for directing projects and programs and providing technical support, analysis, and planning in the areas _of oi] and gas and synthetic fuels for industrial power stations and ship and aircraft propulsion systems. Work has included technical support services to the U. S.° Geological Survey's exploration program on the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska; assessment of tertiary oil recovery projects, conversion processes, and synthetic fuels; analysis of the refining industry as it relates to the utilization of high sulfur, low gravity crude and the production of additive-free high octane gasoline; development of Department of Defense energy plans; technical evaluations and assessments on foreign countries oil, gas, and coal technologies; assessment of the impact on the United States of nonnuclear energy research and development in other countries; development of the first background briefing document for U. S. Oi] and gas teams negotiating with Soviet teams. o STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS HERBERT A. BARTICK 1974 1968 1964 1960 1958 - 1976 - 1974 - 1968 - 1961 - 1964 Manager, Applied Systems Corporation, Energy and Chemical Systems Department, Vienna, Virginia. Directed research and development programs involving hydrocarbon fuels and synthetic fuels derived from shale oil, tar sands, and coal. Managed the first large-scale (10,000 barrel) program for refining shale oil crude into military operational fuels. Directed a program to assess the potential of the U. S. tar sands resource as a source of synthetic military fuels. Received outstanding certificate for the first flight test on synthetic fuels, 1975. Section Head, Atlantic Research Corporation, Heterogeneous Systems Section, Alexandria, Virginia. Directed R & D programs on an advanced solid propellant oxidizer process. Programs included the design, con- struction, start-up, and operation of a completely integrated chemical plant that produced less than one-tenth micron ammonium perchlorate particles for advanced missile propulsion systems. : Program/Project Manager, Atlantic Research Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia. Directed the engineering, research, and development on a broad range of programs, including the development of fuels for ramjet and aircraft gas turbine propulsion systems. Task Leader, Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Fuels and Lubricants Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Directed the research and development of advanced fuels for unconventional propulsion systems, working fluids for electric propulsion systems, slurry fuels, and high energy fuels. Received letters of commendation for outstanding performance at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1961. Project Engineer, Atlantic Research Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, 1961-1964, and Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 1958- 1961. Directed activities on a program involving the development of small thrust control rockets for, stabil- ization or directional control of a main rocket or its payload, statistical analysis of rocket performance data, burning rate control of solid propellants by chemical ' technology, high-energy fuels, and hydrocarbon fuels for adyanced air-breathing propulsion systems. oO Date of Birth: Citizenship: Degrees: Language: Professional Registration: Professional Societies: Honorary Society: June 1976 to Date: HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY EDWARD F. CARTER Planning Engineer February 12, 1947 U. S. A. Master of Business Administration Economics and Finance 1980, The University of Chicago Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Magna Cum Laude 1976, Syracuse University Bachelor of Science in Forest Engineering, Magna Cum Laude 1975, State University of New York, College of Envitommental Science and Forestry English Professional Engineer - Wisconsin American Society of Civil Engineers Illinois Chapter ASCE Tau Beta Pi Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Power Planning Engineer. Lead Engineer for the Wapsinicon River Hydroelectric Project, Iowa, feasibility study. Studies, funded by a DOE loan for small hydro, will provide definite project plan, cost estimate and a determination of economic feasibility for the addition of two new units to an existing powerstation originally constructed in 1922. The capacity will be about 800 kilowatts utilizing a head of 3 meters. Lead Engineer for the updating of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Planning Status Reports on nine river basins throughout the United States. Researched and assembled published data on water resource developments existing and potential, and on water use by existing and projected steam-electric generating facilities with emphasis on appraisals for future hydroelectric licensing. Lead Engineer for the Sullivan Creek Project, Washington, through license application to the Federal Energy EDWARD F. CARTER Power Planning Engineer June 1976 to Date: (Continued) 1966 to 1970: January 1981 16984 Regulatory Commission. Technical, economic and enviromental studies were made of the project which would develop a capacity of about 20 MW utilizing a head of 170 meters. Participated in the feasibility studies for a 3,000 MW underground pumped-storage project in northwestern Illinois for Commonwealth Edison Company. Responsibilities included supervision of team members and preparation of project layouts, quantity and cost estimates, economic studies, and final reports. Participated in the prefeasibility studies for the 800 MW Cuffs Run pumped-storage project in southeastern Pennsylvania. Participated in modernization and power expansion studies for the Safe Harbor and Holtwood hydroelectric projects, which are part of a complex system of hydroelectric plants on the lower Susquehanna River. Responsibilities included project layouts, quantity and cost estimates, power operation computer studies and selection of optimal expansion scheme. Participated in economic and financial analyses for the ENEE Generation System Expansion study, Honduras, C.A. Responsibilities included forecast of expenditure schedules, determination of equalizing discount rates for various generation mixes, selection of power program, sensitivity analyses, effects of construction delay on recommended program, economics of rural electrification and financial justification of the recommended system expansion program. Participated in the preparation of construction plans and schedules for the rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 on the Mississippi River for the St. Paul District Corps of Engineers. Responsibilities included material quantity takeoffs, development of feasible construction approach and critical path method (CPM) scheduling for construction. United States Navy. Petty Officer. In charge of twelve-man survey department. Responsible for the survey portion of major construction and reconstruction projects in the Republic of , Vietnam. HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY HENRY H. CHEN Senior Associate and Assistant Head, Water and Energy Planning and Design Department Degree: Bachelor of Science in Engineering (Honor) University of Hong Kong, 1956 Languages: English and Chinese Professional Engineer — ||linois Professional Societies: American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1959. Senior Associate, 1981. Associate, 1976. Assistant Head, Water and Energy Planning and Design Department, 1979 to date. Power Resources Section: Head, 1977-79; Assistant Section Head, 1973-77; Senior Engineer, Power Planning, 1967-73; Engineer, 1959-67. Experience Highlights: Project Manager for a feasibility study of a 3,000-MW underground pumped-storage project in northwestern Illinois. Project Manager for a study of underground pumped-storage and compressed air energy storage projects for the entire United States, and for evaluating markets for such projects in the utility systems. Project Manager for a feasbility study of generation and transmission expansion in El Salvador, including the 180-MW San Lorenzo Project and the 120-MW 5 de Noveimbre second power plant. Project Engineer for the 1,700-MW Stony Creek Pumped-Storage Project, Pennsylvania, through technical feasibility and environmental studies for FPC license application; 270-MW Cerron Grande Project, El Salvador; the Southern Bolivia power studies; the electric power rate study of the Rivas Irrigation Project, Nicaragua; long-range planning for multipurpose development of Genesee River Basin, Western New York; and for the 240-MW Brookville Pumped-Storage Project, Indiana. Lead Engineer for the 100-MW Finchaa Project, Ethiopia, through feasibility report. Directed the generation expansion studies and the overall economic and financial analysis for the rehabilitation and expansion of the Medan Electric System, Indonesia. Supervised preliminary design of alternative studies of Kaplan versus Francis type turbines for reservoir operation for flood control, irrigation, and power for the 54-MW Amistad Project, Rio Grande, Texas. HENRY H. CHEN 1956 to 1959: Ebasco International Corporation. Hydroelectric Engineer. Technical Papers and Articles: “Economic Analysis of Virginia Electric and Power Company's Bath County Pumped-Storage,”’ with James M. Hagood, Jr., ASCE Power Division Specialty Conference, August 12-14, 1974. “Optimization of Pumped-Storage Project,’’ American Power Conference, April 1976. “The Role of Hydroelectric Power in Meeting Future Power Needs,’’ ASCE: Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, April 25, 1978. “Economics of Low-Head Hydro — U.S. Case.Studies:. Techniques in Economic Analysis,’’ Low-Head Hydroelectric Technology Seminar, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, June 6-7, 1978. “Planning Guri Power Complex,’ with Pedro Palacios H., American Power Conference, 41st Annual Meeting, April 23-25, 1979. 5 /81 CUCCARESE, Sal V., Biologist The primary focus of my work at AEIDC has been on evaluating the environ- mental implications associated with various proposed or extant develop- ments. Working either independently or as part of a multidisciplinary team, I routinely gather necessary research information, analyze it for intent, and synthesize and summarize appropriate material into a usable data base for various projects. My specific responsibilities include the planning and conduct of field and literature investigations, the synthesis of data, and the preparation of draft narratives, graphics, and maps illustrating natural and induced environmental processes. I consider my experience to be an invaluable asset as it has broadened my appreciation of the subtle complexes which influence life. Education Southwestern College, A.S. Biology 1979-73. San Diego State University, B.S. Biology, 1973-75. Professional Experience Research Analyst, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1978 to present. Project Support Assistant, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1976 to 1978. Laboratory Assistant to Dr. D. Humsaker, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. Duties primarilyinvolved live trapping and transporting widely divergent vertebrates. Professional Memberships American Association for the Advancement of Science Selected Projects/Publications Alaska, University, Institute of Social & Economic Research. 1981. Chugach Regional Study: Options C and D and the Status Quo Alternative--A Supplementary Analysis. Anchorage, AK. Report for the U.S. Forest Service. 1 vol. - 1981. Chugach Regional Study: Analysis of CNI Options C and D and the "No-Forest" Alternative. Draft. Anchorage, AK. Report for the U.S. Forest Service. 1 vol. Cuccarese. S.V., and C.D. Evans. 1981. The North Pacific Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaengliae): Its Status on Alaska Grounds. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska. Report for the Pacific Sea Grant Advisory program, Anchorage. 23 pp. Cuccarese, S.V., and M.S. Floyd. 1981. Chugach Regional Study: Environ- mental Assessment of CNI Nominations. Draft. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska and Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Report for the U.S. Forest Service. 1 vol. Dwight, Linda Perry, et al. 1980. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction and Operation of the Proposed Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project, Petersburg and Wrangell, Alaska. Prepared for Robert W. Retherford Associates. 231 pp. Evans, C.D., and S.V. Cuccarese. 1980. The Bowhead Whale - Biolgical Basis for Decision. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska. Report for the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission. Anchorage. 37 pp. Evans, C., et al. 1980. Environmental Review of Summer Construction of Gravel Islands: Sag Delta No. 7 and No. 8, Stefansson Sound, Alaska. Report for Sohio Petroleum Company. 167 pp. Spencer, D.L. 1979. Man and Wildlife: A Display of Relationships in Southcentral Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska. Report for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 48 plates. Wilson, W.J., et al. 1979. An Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Construction and operation of the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Kodiak, Alaska. Arctic Environmental Informatiion and Data Center, University of Alaska. Report for Kodiak Electric Association, Inc., Kodiak. 334 pp. Evans, C.D., et al. 1978. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction, Operation, and Abandonment of a Man-made Gravel Island, Niakuk Well No. 3 in Stefansson Sound, Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. Report for Sohio Petroleum Company, Anchorage. 78 pp. Cuccarese, S.V., and C.D. Evans. 1977. A Technique for the Subjective Analysis of Alaskan Habitat. Proceedings of the 28th Alaska Science Conference. Anchorage. 28(1):83-90. Evans, C.D. 1977. Marine Mammals and the National Wildlife Refuge Pro- posal. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska. Report for the Marine Mammal Commission, Washington, D.C. 46 pp. Evans, C.D., and S.V. Cuccarese. 1977. Evaluation of Wildlife habitats in Alaska. Alternatives for Replacement of National Wildlife Re- fuge Lands. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 183 pp. + 26 maps. EDUCATION RALPH R. DARBYSHIRE Citrus college; Glendora, California University of Oregon; 1963, B.S., Eugene, Oregon University of California, Berkeley, California EXPERIENCE 1977 to Present President Darbyshire & Associates, Inc. Anchorage, Alaska Responsible for client/project development and liaison; staff direction and supervision; company organizational and financial operations. Authored: NANA COASTAL RESOURCE SERVICE AREA PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM. Authored: YUKON-KUSKOKWIM COASTAL RESOURCE SERVICE AREA PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM. Directed the preparation of the YUKON FLATS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT STUDY, authoring chapters on "Local Government Options," "Implications for Regional Self- Determination and Local Control," "Potential Revenue Sources," "Feasibility and Viability of Regional Alternatives," and "The Incorporation Procedure." Supervised preparation of McGRATH COMMUNITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND HOUSING SURVEY ANALYSIS. Prepared work program strategy for the development of a private corporation's multi-million-dollar industrial property. Co-manager for the preparation of community profiles for 25 communities located in the middle Kuskokwim and lower Yukon regions of Alaska. Co-manager for the preparation of community profiles for 6 communities located in the upper Tanana region of Alaska. 1974 to 1977 Supervised the Point Lay relocation planning implementation program. ‘Authored: NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH REGIONAL PLANNING STUDY DESIGN; PT. LAY VILLAGE RELOCATION WORK PROGRAM-SCHEDULE-BUDGET. Completed analysis of North Slope Borough development codes. Partner/Owner Alaska Consultants, Inc. Anchorage, Alaska Provided community planning and administrative consulting services to such clients as: the North Slope Borough, City of Cordova, City of Yakutat, City of Kotzebue, and Bristol Bay Native Association. Team participant in developing a North Slope Borough Capital Improvement Program, : Assisted the City of Yakutat in formulating its early strategy with respect to anticipated onshore economic dislocations expected from OCS oil and gas exploration and development. This consisted chiefly of research assistance in the first phase of its city comprehensive development plan; preparation and implementation of interim land use controls; assistance in land exchange negotiations between the city and SAM group; and general policy advice to the mayor on overall community impact expectations and solutions. Assisted in the preparation of MANAGEMENT OF OCS-RELATED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - A GUIDE FOR ALASKA COASTAL COMMUNITIES. This was prepared for the Department of Community and Regional Affairs by David M. Dornbusch and Co., Inc. Authored: Interim land use plans for Wainwright, Nuiqsut, Atkasook, Kaktovik and Anaktuvuk Pass; KOTZEBUE LAND USE PLAN; NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH ISSUES OVERVIEW; and an interim North Slope Borough zoning ordinance. 1973 to 1974 1967 to 1972 Planning/Community Development Consultant Dupere and Associates, Inc. Juneau, Alaska Responsible for client development and maintenance, contract administration and project management. Implemented contract responsibilities to the North Slope Borough. This included organizing and staffing its new planning department and training the new employees. Participated in the team effort to prepare the first North Slope Borough capital improvement program. This provided for the construction and financing of $120-million in community improvements. Authored: INTERIM WATER, SEWER AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PLAN for the City of Barrow; NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH RECONNAISSANCE STUDY - AN INVENTORY OF THE BOROUGH AND ITS COMMUNITIES; NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH MANPOWER DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY SURVEY REPORT; and DRAFT FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH ZONING ORDINANCE. Planning Director Kenai Peninsula Borough Soldotna, Alaska Provided the organizational, operational and staffing structure for the new department of government. Responsible for personnel, financial and program direction and execution, as well as federal, state and local liaison. Directed the preparation of ten community comprehensive development plans; the borough areawide water and sewer plan; and initiated the borough's land planning and management program for the authorized selection of 181,000 acres of state land. Authored: Borough subdivision and zoning ordinances; REGIONAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL STUDY; and INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN. ER zr iz TO ALA 1965 to Associate Planner 1967 Puget Sound Governmental Conference Seattle, Washington 1963 to Assistant Planner 1965 Sonoma County Planning Department Santa Rosa, California PETER DONALEK Senior Electrical Engineer Degrees: Master of Arts — Mathematics University of Toledo, 1973 Master of Science in Electrical Engineering University of Pennsylvania, 1970 Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering University of Illinois, 1961 Languages: English, speaking and reading knowledge of Portuguese, and reading knowledge of French Professional Engineer — ||/inois Professional Societies: Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers Chairman, Task Force on Discrete Supplementary Controls for Stability The Mathematical Association of America Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Western Society of Engineers Harza Engineering Company sine 1973. Senior Electrical Engineer, 1974 to date; Electrical Engineer, 1973-74. Experience Highlights: Project Engineer and Lead Electrical Engineer for a study and report on technical and economic feasibility of coal mine-mouth generation and a 765-kV transmission network in the United States. Project Engineer and Lead Electrical Engineer for a study and report for electric utility interface requirements and siting of solar power satellite, 5,000-MW rectifying antennas Directed a transient network analyzer study for a 500-kV transmission line in Pakistan Project Engineer on the evaluation of transmission system expansion for the State of Montana. Designed load shedding system for El Salvador bulk power transmission system. Planned for expansion of power transmission system in El Salvador. Prepared specifications for oil minimum circuit breaker. Evaluated a battery system as an alternative to pumped-storage hydro for use in Federal Power Commission license application. Prepared load flow, short circuit, and stability computations used in developing a twenty-five year system expansion plan for the Republic of South Korea. PETER DONALEK Prepared preliminary cost estimates for the electrical portion of various pumped-storage and hydroelectric generating stations. : Prepared cost estimates for various high voltage substations. Prepared alternative electric systems and auxiliary electrical equipment for pumping stations, including studies of motor starting methods for the Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project. : 1971 to 1973: University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio. Graduate Teaching Assistant. Worked on Masters degree in mathematics and taught undergraduate mathematics courses. 1969 to 1971: Spring Garden College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Assistant Professor. Taught introductory courses in electromechanics and electrical power systems. Was in charge of the A.C. Network Analyzer. 1965 to 1968: Sargent & Lundy Engineers, Chicago, IIlinois. Electrical Engineer. Performed electrical power system design studies. Prepared economic comparisons of alternative power plant expansion plans, and analysis of substation short circuit and relay problems. 1963 to 1965: Electrical Engineer and Designer for rural electrification projects in San Francisco River Valley. The work was done in conjunction with the Brazilian government agency Comissao do Vale do Sao Francisco, similar to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1961 to 1963: Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland. Field Service Engineer. Part of a group responsible for the redesign of the radar system used in U.S. Navy aircraft. 11/79 HARDING-' JAY M. ENGLAND NG-LAWSON ASSOCIATES Principal Engineer Mr. England has extensive experience as supervisor and manager of large engineering and planning studies, site investigations and construction projects. He is an experi- enced arctic engineer and has developed special skills for solving geotechnical problems unique to permafrost soils. He established HLA's Anchorage office in 1969; under his direction the office has grown steadily in clientele and technical exper- tise. Mr. England is also a Vice President of HLA and serves as a director of the corporation. EDUCATION Graduate study, engineering management, University of Alaska B.S., Civil Engineering, Pennsylvania State University - 1959 B.A., Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University - 1953 EXPERIENCE 1962 - present: Harding-Lawson Associates 1959 - 1962: U.S. Forest Service, Deschutes National Forest, Oregon 1953 - 1957: U.S. Navy, Lieutenant, Sixth Fleet REGISTRATION Civil Engineer - Alaska, California Land Surveyor - Alaska, Oregon REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS As a Principal Engineer for HLA, Mr. England has been responsible for senior project management, review and direction for hundreds of small and large Alaska projects,. including the following: Railroad Maintenance Building, Anchorage - Soil and foundation investi- gation. , Sagavanirktok Bridge, Prudhoe Bay - Foundation investigation and con- struction inspection. Soil Engineering Services, North Slope - Kuparuk oi] field development. Joint State/Federal Lease Sale Area, Beaufort Sea - Soil and permafrost investigations and laboratory testing. Federal Office Building Complex, Anchorage - Foundation investigation and construction inspection HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES Jay M. England - Page Two Trans-Alaska Pipeline - Project manager during inspection of the in- stallation of prototype vertical support members in a hot oi] test pad loop near Fairbanks. Airstrip Stability Study, National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska - Field exploration, laboratory testing, consulting services. Housing Projects, Miscellaneous Remote Villages, i.e. Kipnuk, Eek, Tanunak, Aniak, Tuluksak, Alaska - Foundation investigation. Barrett Business Center, Anchorage - Foundation investigation and con- struction inspection. High School Complex, Barrow - Foundation investigation. Headquarters Complex, U.S. Fish & Wildlife, Kenai National Moose Range - Foundation investigation. Main Post Office Facility, Anchorage - Foundation investigation and construction inspection. Offshore Island Projects, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Geotechnical investi- gation. Sealand Dock Site, Dutch Harbor - Construction inspection requiring soil exploration, geotechnical engineering, analysis and design. City Dock, Valdez - Foundation investigation, design review, analysis, and seismic criteria. Gas Conditioning Facility, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Foundation and perma- frost investigation using radar system. Underground Utility Systems, Barrow - Soil investigation for design of utility system buried in permafrost. Five and Ten Meter Antenna Foundations, Barrow, Kaktovik, Wainwright - Consultation. Foundation Failures, Kotzebue - Consultation. Gas Pipeline, Koyukuk River Crossing, Alaska - Geophysical investi- gation. MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers Alaska Society of Professional Engineers - (Anchorage Chapter President, 1977) American Arbitration Association (Panel of Arbitrators) Arctic Institute of North America Alaska Ground Water Association Municipality of Anchorage Geotechnical Commission (Chairman, 1979) HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY RICHARD W. FAZALARE Head, Hydraulic Machinery Section Degree: Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Chicago Technical College, 1957 Professional Engineer — Wisconsin Professional Societies: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Illinois Society of Professional Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers The Western Society of Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1956. Head, Hydraulic Machinery Section, 1975 to date; Senior Engineer, Hydraulic Machinery, 1969-75; Turbine Specialist, 1957-69; Mechanical Engineer, 1956-57. Experience Highlights: Selection, analysis, cost estimating, review, shop inspection, and commissioning of hydraulic machinery, including hydraulic turbines, large pumps, and penstock valves, on 30 major hydroelectric projects which are either in operation or under construction totalling 16,550-MW. Among these are: Guri, Venezuela (8,187-MW); Mossyrock, Washington (300-MW); Karun River, Iran (1,000-MW); Finchaa, Ethiopia (100-MW); Wanapum, Washington (831-MW); Markland, Indiana (64-MW); San Lorenzo, E! Salvador (180-MW); San Agaton (Uribante), Venezuela (300-MW); Nispero, Honduras (25-MW); Mayfield, Washington (45-MW); Seneca Pumped-Storage, Pennsylvania (380-MW); and Bath County Pumped Storage, Virginia (2,100-MW). These projects include 39 Kaplan turbines, 44 Francis turbines, 9 Pelton turbines, and 8 pump-turbines of the reversible Francis type. Shop and field inspections and testing of hydraulic equipment, including model testing and investigation of field operating problems. Layout of powerhouse piping systems general mechanical work, including designs and checking. Preparation of design and construction drawings for hydraulic turbine draft tube gates. Layout of design plans and preparation of construction drawings of highway bridges and railroad bridge for Illinois Tri-State Toll Road. 1954 to 1956: Bertman Electric Company, Chicago, IIlinois. Engineer, Development Department Test Laboratory. Design and testing of universal electric motors. 1948 to 1954: Union Special Machine Company, Chicago, Illinois. Engineer. Design and detailing machine parts. RICHARD W. FAZALARE Technical Papers and Articles: “Seneca Pumped-Storage Power Plant, Description of Hydraulic Machinery,”’ presented to Pennsylvania Electric Association, October 1969. “The 10,000 Megawatts of Hydraulic Turbines for the Guri Project,’ American Power Conference 41st Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, April 23-25, 1979. 11/79 Curriculum Vitae MARVIN L. FELDMAN Title Economist Expertise Natural Resources Economics Energy Economics Water Resources Management Decision Analysis Experience Project Manager With Firm e Development of an Environmental Regulations Guide and Pro- gram of Assistance to Cogenerators to obtain necessary environmental approvals, sponsored by Pacific Gas & Electric Company. e Social and economic assessment of impacts of designation of segments of the Kern River under the Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, for U.S. Forest Service. i! Principal Investigator = e Feasibility assessment of coal resources of northwest Alaska : as replacement heat and power source in rural villages, for d] the Alaska Power Authority. Ls e Analysis of the strategic implications of mining colbalt, chromium, and nickel from laterite deposits, Del Norte County, California; assessment of the socioeconomic impacts of the above project, for California Nickel Corporation. : e Development of methodology and socioeconomic assessment of ma Alaska OCS oil and gas development in the St. George Basin, ii North Aleutian Shelf, and the Navarin Basin, for the Bureau of Land Management. e Central Arizona Water Control Study: developed a multi- if attribute scheme for integrating direct benefits, and envi- MS ronmental and socioeconomic values in selecting candidate project plans which best represent the decisionmakers' preferences; assessment of Regional Development Impacts of the alternative proposed plans, for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Water & Power Resources Service. Past Research Assistant, University of Wisconsin Experience e Conducted a decision analysis to assist the Wisconsin energy office in selecting proposals for funding under the 1979 state Energy Conservation Plan. .- e Assistant to the editor of Land Economics. Dames & Moore Academic Background Professional Affiliations Publications « Research Associate, Washington State University: Coordi- nated a study of the economic impact of development of ground and surface water supplies for irrigation in eastern Washington. Developed pumping cost and regional economic models, interfaced with the geohydrologic resource model of the area. e Hydrologist, National Park Service: Supervised water re- sources studies for national park areas. Coordinated the development of a service-wide plan for implementing water quality standards in park areas. B.S., geology, City College of New York M.S., water resources management, University of Wisconsin Ph.D., natural resources economics, University of Wisconsin American Economics Association; American Agricultural Eco- nomics Association; The Institute for Management Sciences; Operations Research Society of America; International Associ- ation of Energy Economists Dissertation: "Portfolio-Multiattribute Utility Analysis: An Application to the 1979 Wisconsin State Energy Conservation Plan" "Portfolio-Multiattribute Decision Analysis: Methodology and an Application," Management Sciences "Man/Model Interfaces in R & D Project Selection," IEEES Transactions on Man, Systems and Sybernetics HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY SIDNEY M. FELLOWS Resources Economist Degrees: Bachelor of Arts in Economics University of Pacific, 1954 Associate of Arts in Agriculture and Business Delta College, 1952 Languages: English and some reading knowledge of Spanish Professional Societies: American Economics Association American Agricultural Economics Association Society of International Development Harza Engineering Company since 1975. Resources Economist, 1975 to date: Land Reclamation and Irrigation Section, 1979 to date; Land Resources Section, 1975-79. Experience Highlights: Responsibilities include economic and financial analyses of land and water resource development projects including general economic studies for project evaluation, project plan development, and financial repayment analyses. Recent assignments include: Gauley and Kanawha River Basins and Summersville Project, West Virginia. Assisted in devetoping socioeconomic projections for selected service areas and in estimating regional economic impacts of the Summersville Project. Jordan Valley Project, Stage II. Assisted in an incremental economic analysis of Maqarin Dam which considered alternative dam sizes and water yields for irrigation and municipal and industrial purposes. Rural Electrification Project, Egypt. Assigned as staff economist to assist the resident team in formulating an electrification construction program in the rural zones of Egypt. Program priorities were based on a benefit-cost analysis of providing electricity to each zone. Kajakai Power Market Survey, Afghanistan. Prepared a power market inventory and forecast of existing and potential demand for electricity in the Upper Helmand-Arghandab Valleys. Black River-Upper Morass Drainage and Irrigation Project, Jamaica. Prepared the economic and financial analyses at the project and farm levels. Project economic analysis considered the incremental benefits and costs of several project components — existing facilities, project drainage only, incremental irrigation, and the total project development. Jordan Valley Marketing Study, Jordan. Acted as project economist and coordinator for a study of the potential domestic and export demands for the main agricultural crops grown in the Jordan Valley. Major export markets studied included the neighboring and Persian Gulf countries of Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. SIDNEY M. FELLOWS Puyango-Tumbes Irrigation Project, Ecuador and Peru. Assigned as an agricultural economist on the irrigation and drainage project covering 70,000 hectares along the border between Ecuador and Peru. . Lake Andes-Wagner Irrigation Project, South Dakota. Assigned as an agricultural economist on a feasibility study ' of the Irrigation District's ability to finance construction of an irrigation system to irrigate 80,000 acres. 1970 to 1975: to International Engineering Company, San Francisco, California. " Senior Economist. Assignments involved feasibility studies of water resource development projects, including the Karnafuli Irrigation and Muhuri River Projects in Bangladesh. Assisted in preparing the financial and economic analysis for the Inga-Shaba Transmission Line in Zaire and the financial analysis of the Taipei Water Supply Project in Taiwan. Assisted in correlating selected socioeconomic parameters with historical and future electrical energy demand for the Nicaragua National Power Study. Other field assignments included work in Guatemala and Algeria. 1968 to 1970: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Cyprus. Water Planning Economist. Served on the Master Water Planning Project for Cyprus, and was responsible for the development of regional projections of water demand in the sectors of municipal, agricultural, mining, industrial, and tourism for the period 1970 to 2000. The study included the estimation of potential domestic and export marketing of the major agricultural crops, estimating the potential benefits of meeting the future 1 » water demands, and making economic appraisals of alternative development proposals. 1960 to 1968: ~ Department of Water. Resources, State of California, Sacramento, California. Prepared the economic and financial! analyses of state water development projects in the Central Coastal Area and in the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys, Included were the Coastal San Mateo Water Plan, the Colusa Basin Flood Control Project, and the San Joaquin Valley Drainage Project. While assigned to the Central Planning Staff, evaluated the benefits of providing a dependable water supply and the economic impact of accepting short-term deficiencies in the amount of agricultural and municipal water supplied to given service areas. 1/80 ee - Date of Birth: Citizenship: Degrees: Professional Registrations: Professional Societies: July 1981 to Date: 1976 to July 1981: HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY PAUL S. FORD Senior Geotechnical Engineer Resident Manager - Alaska Operations September 24, 1936 U.S.A. Master of Science in Civil Engineering 1963, University of Illinois Bachelor of Arts in Physics and Mathematics 1961, Monmouth College Professional Engineer - Idaho, Illinois, Oregon, Washington American Society of Civil Engineers International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundations National Society of Professional Engineers Washington Society of Professional Engineers Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Senior Geotechnical Engineer. Responsible for resident client and project liaison and business development in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest. Lead Geotechnical Engineer for design phase geotechnical investigation of 75 MW Summer Falls Project in eastern Washington. Dames & Moore, Seattle, Washington. Partner. Project Manager of reconnaissance feasibility study of 50 MW hydroelectric project in eastern Washington. Project Manager of geotechnical evaluation for feasibility study of the 10 MW Sandy Creek hydroelectric project in western Washington for Puget Sound Power & Light Company. Project Manager for geohydrologic studies of alternative methods of flood protection for the Regional Water Treatment Plant, City of Anacortes, Washington. Project Manager for geotechnical and hydraulic engineering and slope protection design of waterfront development from Mt. St. Helens dredge spoils in Columbia River for Weyerhauser Company. PAUL S. FORD <9 Senior Geotechnical Engineer Resident Manager - Alaska Operations 1976 to July 1981: (Continued) 1968 to 1975: Senior Engineer for EIS on water flood project at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska for Alaska District, Corps of Engineers. Project Manager for marine biology water quality, flood retention, marine land fill, docking facilities and dredging studies in Puget Sound and on the Columbia River, Washington. Project Manager for site selection and alternate site comparison for major wood products plant in Minnesota and Michigan for Weyerhauser Company. Project Manager for land status, EIS permitting and planning of geologic exploration program for potential geothermal resources in Washington, Idaho, Oregon and California. Project Manager for planning and design of stabilization of four major landslides in Washington and Idaho. Consultation on marine landfill and foundation problems in Valdez and Sitka, Alaska. Client and Technical Advisor for environmental monitoring and licensing studies of 2200 MW Skagit Nuclear Power Plant site in Washington. Dames & Moore, Chicago, Illinois. Staff Engineer to Partner. Project Manager for planning and design of Lake Mashkenode Dam, canal and control works for water supply at the U.S. Steel tactonite plant in Minnesota. Project Manager for Environmental Report, site portion of Safety Analysis Report, licensing support and geotechnical design investigations and recommendations for 1100 MW Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant in Kansas, involving 5,000 acres off channel cooling reservoir with major earthworks for development of a 12,500 acre site. Project Manager for geohydrologic, foundation engineering, wave protection designs at Unit 2 of Enrico Fermi Nuclear Plant in Michigan and alternate site studies, site safety analysis report, environmental report and geotechnical design recommendations for 2200 MW La Salle Nuclear Plant in Illinois. PAUL S. FORD -3- Senior Geotechnical Engineer Resident Manager - Alaska Operations 1968 to 1975: (Continued) 1967 to 1968: 1963 to 1967: November 1981 29006 Project Manager for planning through construction Management of 25 acre land reclamation project in Hudson River, New York. Project Manager for site selection studies for 1600 MW to 3200 MW coal fueled power plant sites in Illinois and Michigan and 2200 MW nuclear plant site in Illinois. Project Manager for numerous foundation engineering studies for many types of facilities in 15 states. 'Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Shift Engineer in charge at Upper Reservoir, Kinzua Pumped-Storage Project, Pennsylvania. Supervised engineering staff monitoring of upper reservoir and shaft construction. Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois. Civil Design Engineer. Performed design and construction phase geotechnical studies of the 1,200,000 cfs Mangla Spillway in West Pakistan, of Angat Dam and Dike in the Philippines, of Mossyrock and Mayfield hydroelectric projects in Washington, of the Brokopondo project in Suriname, and other water supply and hydroelectric dam projects. EDUCATION WILLIAM LOUIS HANLEY University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Master of Urban and Regional Planning University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana; 1976, B.A. Architecture PERIEN 1979 to Senior Planning Associate Present Darbyshire & Associates, Inc. Anchorage, Alaska Applied economic base theory in developing a computerized analysis (using the "rows-only" approach) of the NANA regional economy under its coastal zone management program. This work involved: designing, testing and administering an infield survey of businesses and government; developing a description of the present components of the economy, their local interaction and ultimate dependence on nonlocal markets; conducting indepth research into the future prospects for economic change; developing a profile and analysis of the current workings of the regional economy; and, finally, developing a forecast of the economy out to 1990. Conducted a confidential market analysis of Bethel Native Corporation (BNC) land holdings. This analysis was based on an evaluation of the overall land development demand in Bethel and appraised the potential of individual BNC lands to meet these expected demands. Responsible for field investigation, research, data ‘compilation and writing of the environmental considerations for community profiles for the upper Tanana communities of Delta Junction, Dot Lake, Tanacross, Tok, Tetlin and Northway. Responsible for preparation of portions of McGrath Comprehensive Development Plan. Responsibilities included: field research and the preparation of 1978 to 1979 technical reports. These reports covered the physical setting of McGrath; a survey of business firms, economic modeling and analysis, and research on key determinants of growth. Responsible for the forecast of changes in the local economy and computing the effects of these changes on McGrath's economic and resource base. Designed and conducted a field survey of business firms and agencies within the City of Bethel. Completed follow-up research and incorporated the findings into an automated economic model adapted to the Bethel area. Also, was reSponsible for writing the text of the profile of Bethel's economy based on output from the economic model. Later researched key determinants of change in Bethel's economy and used the model to forecast future levels in the economy, the population, land use and demands on community facilities and services. These efforts were included as an element within Bethel's Comprehensive Development Plan. Authored: McGRATH COMMUNITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND HOUSING SURVEY ANALYSIS. Designed and developed an automated economic model for use as a policy, planning and management tool for economic, resource, environmental and community development planners and managers, Developed software for automating socioeconomic survey compilation and cross-tabbing. Prepared North Slope Borough's proposal for developing a computerized permitting system and cartographic data base for the Prudhoe Bay area. Analyzed the possibility of developing an automated lands record system for Bethel Native Corporation. Associate Planner Municipality of Anchorage, Planning Department Anchorage, Alaska Responsible for providing research support to the planning and other municipal departments. Assisted in the design and development of a computerized municipal information system. 1977 to 1978 1977 Designed and coordinated the renovation of the municipality's current population estimates. This was done through the development of a housing stock atlas which was keyed to the certificates of occupancy issued by the municipality. Responsible for coordinating the U.S. Census Bureau's computerized GBF/DIME file for the 1980 Census. This included reorganization of data analysis boundaries to ensure compatibility with the DIME system and Census survey. Research Assistant International Food and Agricultural Service Gainesville, Florida Principal researcher in the design and development of a state calibrated Input-Output Model (derived from National Table) for the State of Florida, with sub-tables corresponding to the state Water Management district's. Model functioned to capture the direct and indirect consumption of water by projected regional industry growth or expansion. Research Assistant Publicly Funded Graduate Research Projects Gainesville, Florida Inventoried data requirements and processes of the city's permitting, licensing, inspection and development monitoring functions. Developed an urban information/development/management system for the City of Tampa, Florida. Developed Energy Analysis models of the Western U.S. coal industries. This included computerized simulation techniques to understand trends and develop projections. ERDA contract #EY-76-S-05-4398 (publication). 1975 Architectural Intern William Holfords and Associates Glasgow, Scotland In charge of engineering surveys of the ancient Glasgow underground system--both the tunnel and rolling stock systems. Prepared brief economic impact analysis of the neighborhoods near the underground stations. Conducted feasibility studies of housing and commercial structures to meet projected economic demand from increased underground ridership. DANIEL F. HEALY, P. E. Wyncote, Pennsylvania -d EDUCATION: REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: 1968 to Present: 1951 - 1968 1948 - 1951 une 15, 1926 University of Pennsylvania M. E. 1948 and graduate work in mathematics and statistics at the University of Washington. (MECHANICAL ) State of Washington, 1962, No. 8233 State of California, 1963, No. 1246 National Society of Professional Engineers American Society of Heating, Refrigeration ~ and Air Conditioning Engineers American Society for Metals Society of Manufacturing Engineers (Certified Manufacturing Engineer) American Management Association Thompson, Miller & Lyons Consulting Engineers : Principal responsible for project management and design of power and industrial plant pro- cesses, steam power plant design and heating, ventilating, air conditioning. Boeing Airplane Company as a manufacturing engineer, which included design and evaluation of tools, equipment, and manufacturing processes, and business systems development. Hydraulic system design for controls was a major breakthrough, pioneered and developed under Mr. Healy's direction. Breslin and Healy. Partner in the firm of a. ‘Philadelphia company engaged in sheet metal fab- rication and truck body construction. Mr. Healy's community services include membership on the Board of Directors of the Snoqualmie Falls Forest Theater and former Precinct Committeeman and Area Chairman. STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS Curriculum Vitae | JAMES E. HEMMING Title Manager, Alaska Operations Senior Biologist Expertise Management of interdisciplinary projects, arctic and sub- arctic biology, commercial fishery evaluation, subsistence survey, aquatic and terrestrial habitat classification and inventory, remote sensing and aerial photography, and envi- ronmental surveillance. ’ Experience e Manager, Alaska operations with special emphasis on bio- With Firm logical services. © Project manager for biological baseline studies and directed the preparation of related portions of the EIS for the proposed Alaska Petrochemical Company refinery in Valdez, Alaska. ° Conducted ornithological investigations and studies of plant communities in Port Valdez, Alaska. ®* Developed an implementation plan for technological and economic feasibility analysis of the emerging groundfish Fishery off Alaska. * Provided a biological evaluation of a major Bering Sea fishery and identified the impacts of that fishery on subsistence fishermen of the Arctic/Yukon/Kuskokwim area. ° Contributing author to several major reports to the Bureau of Land Management, Anchorage, that describe the potential influence of petroleum exploration and development in the outer continental shelf areas of the Bering and Beaufort Sea, on fish and wildlife resources and subsistence users. Past © Joint State/Federal Fish and Wildlife Advisory Team, 1974- Experience 1977. Federal coordinator and co-chairman of the inter- agency team. As the senior Department of Interior representative, directed a team of 32 professional biolo- gists who were responsible for environmental monitoring and design review on the trans- Alaska crude oil pipeline. © Bureau of Land Managment, Division of Pipeline, 1971-1974, Staff biologist. Provided technical leadership and staff coordination related to protection of fish and wildlife resources along the trans-Alaska pipeline. Identified and evaluated fish and wildlife stocks and their habitat between Valdez Arm and Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Dames & Moore Professional Affiliations Honors Academic Background Technical Reports and Publications ° Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1967-1971. Research leader for statewide caribou studies. Conducted research on various phases of caribou biology and developed cooperative research programs with other agencies in the United States and Canada. * Arctic Health Research Center, 1963-1965. Served as re- search biologist in the Zoonotic Disease Section investi- gating animal-borne diseases and the zoogeography of Alaska birds. e Atomic Energy Commission, 1961-1963. Consultant biologist on Project Chariot. Prepared scientific reports describing ornithological studies at Cape Thompson in northwestern Alaska. * Montana State Forestry Department, 1959-1961. Served as a remote sensing specialist. Delineated forest types and classified forest age structures from black and white aerial photo imagery for all private and state lands in western Montana. The Wildlife Society Pacific Northwest Bird and Mammal Society ° The American Ornithologists' Union The Cooper Society American Fisheries Society Arctic Institute of North America 1974-1975 President Northwest Section of the Wildlife Society. 1974 Selected as exchange scientist to study ecosystems of northern Siberia. 1971-1973 Chairman, Wildlife Section of the Alaska Interagency Fish and Wildlife Team. 1965-1967 University of Montana, M.S. in zoology. 1958-1961 University of Montana, B.S. in wildlife technology. Hemming, J.E., W.W. Wade, P.M. Knode and W.B. Driskell, 1980. Capacity analysis of the salmon fisheries industry. Municipality of Anchorage. 42 pp. Hemming, J.E. and D.E. Erikson, 1979. The birds of Port Valdez. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Alaska Petrochemical Company. 31 pp. Hemming, J.E. and D.E. Erikson, 1979. Plant communities of eastern Port Valdez. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Alaska Petrochemical Company. 15 pp. 8 Hemming, J.E. and D.E. Erikson, 1979. The birds of Island Flats area, Valdez, Alaska. Dames & Moore. Prepared for the City of Valdez. 26 pp. Hemming, J.E., G.S. Harrison and S.R. Braund, 1978. The social and economic impacts of a commercial herring fishery on the coastal villages of the Arctic/Yukon/ Kuskokwim area. Dames & Moore. Prepared for the North Pacific Fishery Management Council. 186 pp. Hemming, J.E£., J. Houghton and J.W. Morsell, 1978. Field validation of fish streams between the Canadian border and Delta Junction, Alaska. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company. 15 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1978. Special measures to protect fish and wildlife during construction of the trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline. pp. 103-108. Proceedings 1977 BLM Surface Protection Sympo- sium, Anchorage, Alaska. Klein, D.R. and J.E. Hemming, 1976. Resource development and related environmental problems in Arctic Alaska --Impact on fish and wildlife. p. 15-23. In Proceedings XXIII Interna- tional Geographical Congress, Moscow, U.S.S.R. Hemming, J.E. and K.A. Morehouse, 1976. Wildlife Atlas: Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline, Valdez to Prudhoe Bay. Joint State/Federal Fish and Wildlife Advisory Team Special Report Number 3, Anchorage, Alaska. 30 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1975. Alaskan problems and prospects, p. l1l- 14. In Proceedings First International Reindeer and Caribou Symposium, Fairbanks, Alaska. 551 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1975. Population and movement patterns of the Nelchina caribou herd. pp. 162-169. In Proceedings First International Reindeer and Caribou Symposium, Fairbanks, Alaska, 551 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1974. Accelerated development and wildlife in northern Alaska. pp. 38-42. In Man's impact on arctic and subarctic environments. Arctic Institute of North America in coop. with American Institute of Biological Sciences. 63 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1971. Distribution and movement patterns of caribou in Alaska. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Game Technical Bulletin Number 1. 60 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1970. The caribou in Alaska. Alaska Depart- ment of Fish and Game, Wildlife Notebook Series. 2 pp. Hemming, J.E. and R.E. Pegau, 1970. Caribou report. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fed. Aid in Wildl. Restoration, W-17-1, W-17-2, Juneau, Alaska. 42 pp. Hemming, J.E. and L.P. Glenn, 1969. Caribou project annual segment report. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fed. Aid in Wildl. Restoration, W-15-R-3, W-17-1, Juneau, Alaska. 37 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1969. Cemental deposition, tooth succession and horn development as criteria of age in Dall sheep. J. Wildl. Mgmt., 33(3):552-558. Hemming, J.E. and L.P. Glenn, 1968. Caribou project annual segment report. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fed. Aid in Wildl. Restoration, W-17-1, Juneau, Alaska. 41-pp. Hemming, J.E., 1968. Copulatory behavior of the red- necked grebe on open water. The Wilson Bull., 80(3): 326-327. Hemming, J.E., 1967. Mandibular dentition and horn develop- ment as criteria of age in the Dall Sheep, Ovis dalli Nelson. M.S. thesis. University of Montana, Missoula. 42 pp. Hemming, J.E., 1966. Notes on the status of some birds in southcentral Alaska. The Condor, 68(2):163-166. Hemming, J.E., 1965. Unusual occurrences of birds in northern Alaska. The Murrelet, 46(1):6. Hemming, J.E., 1963. Winter record of the rusty blackbird near Anchorage, Alaska. Bull. Alaska Ornithological Society, 3:6. 6 HENSEL, RICHARD J., Adjunct Associate in Wildlife Biology Position Description Maintains comprehensive, up-to-date knowledge of sources of information on biotic resources of Alaska and maintains first-hand knowledge of these resources, their use by man, and factors that affect them. Syn- thesizes information into reports and information documents. Responds to specific requests for information. Functions as advisor to the Director. Born January 2, 1930 Soc. Sec. No. . 186-28-4003 Education Utah State University, B.S., 1956. University of Alaska, Post Graduate Studies, 1958 through 1960. Experience . Adjunct Associate in Wildlife Biology with Arctic Environmental Informa- tion and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska, April, 1980 to present. One year as Wildlife Biologist for Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center on the assessment of environmental effects of construc- tion and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak, Alaska. Six months as Wildlife Biologist and consultant to Dowl Engineers on environmental reconnaissance of the Beluga Methanol Project, Placer Amex Incorporated. Two years as Wildlife Biologist on proposed national parks in northern Alaska with the U.S. Department of Interior; National Park Service. Two years as Wildlife Biologist for land classification studies with the U.S. Department of Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Two years as Research Biologist for polar bear studies with the U.S. Department of Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, National Fish and Wildlife Laboratory, Anchorage, Alaska. Two years as Native Involvement Coordinator for the Alaska Area Director, U.S. Department of Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. as Three years as Assistant Refuge Supervisor (Operations) for national wildlife refuges in Alaska with the U.S. Department of Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Ten years as Refuge Manager of Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge with the U.S. Department of Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Professional Memberships National Refuge Association Nature Conservancy Trumpeter Swan Society The Wildlife Society Alaska Conservation Society American Society of Mammalogists Selected Publications Berns, V.D., and R.J. Hensel. 1970. Radio Tracking Brown Bears on Kodiak Island.. In bears - their biology and management. Inter- national Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland, New Series No. 23:19-25. — Erickson, A.W., H.W. Moosman, R.J. Hensel, and W.A. Troyer. 1969. . The Breeding Biology of the Male Brown Bear (Ursus arctos). Zoologica, 53(3):85-105. Lentfer, J.W., R.J. Hensel, C.H. Miller, L.P. Glenn, and V.D. Berns. 1970. Remarks on Denning Habits of Alaska Brown Bears. In bears - their biology and management. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland, New Series No. 23:125-132. , : Lentfer, IW, and R.J. Hensel. 1970. Alaskan Polar Bear Denning. Submitted for publication in Proceedings: In bears - their biology and management. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland, February, 1977. Lentfer, J.W., R.J. Hensel, J.A. Gilbert, and F. Sorenson. 1978. Population Characteristics of Alaskan Polar Bears. ‘Submitted for publication in Proceedings: In bears - their biology and management. International. Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland, February, 1977. Hensel, R.J. and W.A. Troyer. 1964. Nesting Studies of the Bald Eagle in Alaska. The Condor. 66(4):282-286. Hensel, R.J., W.A. Troyer, and A.W. Erickson. 1969. Reproduction in the Female Brown Bear. J. Wild. Mgt. 33(2):357-365. Hensel, R.J. and T.G. Grubb. 1977. Food Habits of Nesting Bald Eagles on Kodiak Island, Alaska. Submitted for publication to the Condor, December, 1976. Hensel, R.J. and F.A. Sorenson. 1978. Age Determination in Captive Polar Bears. Submitted for publication in Proceedings: In bears - their biology and management. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland, 1977. Sprunt, A., W.B. Robertson, Jr., S. Postupalsky, R.J. Hensel, C.E. Knoder, and F.J. Ligas. 1973. Comparative Productivity of Six Bald Eagle Populations. Trans. 38th North American Wild and Natural Resources Conference. Published by Wild. Mgt. Insti- tute, Washington, D.C. Troyer, W.A., R.J. Hensel, and K.E. Durley. 1962. Live Trapping and Handling of Brown Bears. J. Wild. Mgt. 26-330-331. Troyer, W.A. and R.J. Hensel. 1962. Cannibalism in Brown Bear Under Stress. J. Mamm. (45(3)):488-489. Troyer, W.A. and R.J. Hensel. 1965. Nesting and Productivity of Bald Eagles on the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska. The Auk. 82(4) :636-638. Wiemeyer, S.N., B.M. Mulhern, F.J. Ligas, R.J. Hensel, J.E. Mathisen, F.C. Robards, and S. Postupalsky. 1972. Residues of Pesticides, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, and Mercury in Bald Eagle Eggs and Changes In Shell Thickness - 1969 through 1970. Pest. Monit. J. 6(1) :50-55. Spencer, D.L. and R.J. Hensel. 1980. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction and Operation of the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Kodiak, Alaska - Brown Bear Studies, Mountain Goat Studies. Prepared by Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, Alaska. THOMAS D. HUMPHREY, P.E. Anchorage, Alaska - November 1, 1981 EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ACTIVITIES: AWARDS : PROFESSIONAL HISTORY: California State University, B.S. 1970 University of Alaska, M.B.A. Candidate Studies, 1974-1977 State of Alaska, Electrical Engineer, No. 4415-E State of Alaska, Electrical Administrator (All Categories), No. 353 State of Hawaii, Electrical Engineer, No. 4616 State of Nevada, Electrical Engineer, No. 5340 CEDC, Community Enterprise Development Corp. of Alaska; Anchorage, Alaska; CEDC Sales, Inc. dba Alaska Commercial Co., Kent, Washington Director (Business Community Representative) 1976, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81 IEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Member, Power Engineering Society Member, Speech, Acoustics and Signal Processing Group IES, Illuminating Engineering Society Member SPE, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME Member SCORE/ACE Anchorage, Alaska Chapter Past Chairman 1975 U.S. Patent No. 4,024,789 - “Tone Analysis System with Visual Display" U.S. Patent No. 3,894,186 - Electronic Tone Analysis 1979-1981 Thomas D. Humphrey, P.E. Co. Anchorage, Alaska Owner 1979-1981 Northline Electric Co. Anchorage, Alaska Owner STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS f { v Thomas D. Humphrey, P.E. (continued) 1974 1971 - 1973 1970 Northland Capital Anchorage, Alaska Associate Sound Sciences, Inc. Santa Ana, California Vice President, Engineering Trace Mfg. Co. : El Segundo, California Project Manager HAR ZA encineerinc company KHALID JAWED Senior Hydrologist Degrees: Master of Science in Civil Engineering Hydrology and Water Resources Branch Colorado State University, 1973 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of Punjab, Pakistan, 1958 Languages: English, Urdu, and reading knowledge of Farsi. Professional Society: © American Society of Civil Engineers. Harza Engineering Company, 1964-65; Since 1976. Hydrology and Groundwater Section: Senior Hydrologist, 1976 to date; Planning Section: Hydrologist, 1964-65, Experience Highlights: Performs hydrologic analyses including those for determination of spillway design floods, flood and drought frequency, derivation of unit hydrographs, river sediment transport and reservoir sedimentation; reservoir operation, and ground-water movement and yields. Field activities include design and installation of meteorological and hydrologic stations, stream gauging, and sediment sampling and laboratory analysis. Specific office assignments included cross drainage studies for the Gotvand Irrigation Project, lran; reservoir operations studies for the Kajakai reservoir, Afghanistan; water supply and probable maximum precipitation studies for the Jordan Valley Stage I! Irrigation Project, Jordan; backwater analysis, and rainfall frequency analysis for the Upper Morass Project, Jamaica; design of automated remote hydrologic and meteorological networks and calibration and use of U.S. National Weather River Forecasting system model for the Guri Final Stage Project, Venezuela; probable maximum flood studies for Ashton Dam, Idaho, Big Sandy Flyash Dam, Kentucky, Piney Dam, Pennsylvania and Brumley Gap Pumped Storage Project, West Virginia; intake sedimentation study, Zimmer Nuclear Power Plant, Ohio; and water supply and reservoir yield analyses for Vermillion Power Station, Illinois. Specific field assignments included installation of tipping bucket rain gages and manometer-servos hooked to digital recorders in the Caroni basin, Venezuela and suspended sediment and bed material sampling in the Ohio River near Zimmer, Ohio, 1973 to 1976: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), Lahore, Pakistan. Senior Engineer. Responsibilities included compilation, interpretation and publication of hydrometeorological data collected by WAPDA; computations of suspended sediment load transported by rivers; associated with Harza Engineering Company International at Lahore, Pakistan for preparing report titled, ““Appraisal of Flood Manage- ment Systems in Pakistan, Volume | — Flood Forecasting and Flood Warning Systems, Volume || — Existing Flood Control Structures and Recommendations for a Planning Program.” KHALID JAWED 1971 to 1973: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. . Graduate Research Assistant. 1965 to 1971: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), Lahore, Pakistan. Senior Engineer. Responsibilities included compilation, interpretation and publication of hydrometeorological data collected by WAPDA, computation of suspended and bed load transported by river and canals, participated in sedimentation survey of Mangla Reservoir. 1964 to 1965: Harza Engineering Company, Chicago, !Ilinois. Work included rainfall-runoff relations, computation of backwater profiles, computations of maximum probable storm and flood; generation of streamflow records, and evapotranspiration computations, 1960 to 1964: Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), Lahore, Pakistan. Responsibilities included collection of basic data for ground-water investigations, study of changes in ground-water levels, analysis of aquifer-test data for transmissibility and specific yield, installation, maintenance and operation of all instruments and related structures required for hydrometeorological investigation; collection of hydraulic parameters for existing canal systems in Pakistan; verification of Lacey regime cana! formulae; collection and laboratory analysis of suspended sediment and bed material samples, 1958 to 1959: Punjab Irrigation and Power Department, Pakistan. Sub-divisional Officer. Duties included design of a small irrigation scheme; and discharge observations on rivers and canals. . Technical Papers and Articles: Responsible for the following WAPDA publications: Sediment Appraisal of West Pakistan Rivers; 1967, 1969, 1970 and January 1975, Snow Surveys of West Pakistan, June 1969. Instructions for River Gage Observers and Stream Gauging and Sediment Sampling, 1967. Co-Author for U. S, G. S, Water Supply Paper 1608-K, “Water Resources and Related Geology of D. |, Khan District, Pakistan,"’ with reference to availability of ground water for development. Procedures Followed for Finalizing Discharge, Sediment, Water Quality and Climatological Record, Surface Water Hydrology Project, WAPDA, July 1974. Master of Science Thesis: “Comparison of Methods of Deriving Unit Hydrographs,”” Special Study for M.S.: “A Study of Relationship between Watershed Parameters and Peak Discharge,”” Co-author for Colorado State University Publication No, 73KJ-RR-EF34, “Deriving a Unit Hydrograph in the Absence of Detailed Rainfall Data,’’ June 1973. 12/80 HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES STEVEN A. JOHNSON Senior Geologist Mr. Johnson has seven years of experience as an engineering geologist, in Alaska. He has performed and directed onshore and offshore soils exploration for docks, petrochemical facilities, mining opera- tions, water supply projects, pipelines, and power plants. EDUCATION M.S., Engineering Geology, Purdue University - 1974 B.S., Geological Engineering, University of Alaska - 1973 EXPERIENCE 1978 - present: Harding-Lawson Associates 1977 - 1978: Champion Drilling Company, Inc. 1974 - 1976: Alaska Geological Consultants, Inc./Northwest Exploration Services, Inc. 1974: Dames & Moore 1972 - 1974: Purdue University (teaching assistant) REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Rotary Drilling and Wireline Coring, Remote island in North Pacific - Planning all phases of logistics and direct supervision of drilling program in the field. Marine Geophysical Survey, Sitka, Alaska - Bathymetry, sub-bottom pro- filing and side scan sonar survey of possible routes for sewer outfall line. Permafrost Coring, Alcan gas pipeline route - Project planning and logistic assistance. Drilling of Five Island Sites, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Field project manager on geotechnical drilling operations for major oi] company. Offshore Drilling, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Field project manager investigating four sites from barge. Holes were 100 feet below mudline. Offshore Drilling, Valdez, Alaska - Supervised drilling six holes in the port for pile design for product dock. Drilling for Potential Well Pad Locations, Lower Yukon Delta and Yan- tarni Bay, Alaska - Used helicopter with a portable drill rig to com- plete the project for two major petroleum firms. HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES Steven A. Johnson - Page Two Waterflood Project, Prudhoe Bay - Field project manager for offshore investigations. Soil Boring Programs, Trans-Alaskan Pipeline route - Supervised numer- ous construction mode confirmation soil boring programs. Responsibili- ties included coordinating field phases of programs and insuring proper sampling techniques were observed in a wide range of frozen and thawed soils. Generating Facility, Beluga area, Alaska - Geotechnical investigation and design of foundation for new generating facility in Beluga area. Supervised analysis of soil borings and final report preparation. Geophysical and Sampling Programs, Resurrection Creek, Alaska - deter- mined tenor of gold bearing placer gravels. Wharf and Docking Facilities, Afognak Island, Alaska - Geotechnical in- vestigation for wharf and docking facilities: supervised offshore drilling program, analyzed resultant data, and prepared final report. Water supply investigations, Various Pump Stations, Alaska - Directed office and field research required to develop permanent water supply at Pump Station #3 and assisted in investigations at Pump Station #1, 4, and 5. Coal Exploration Study, Beluga Basin, Alaska - Performed preliminary field survey (coordinating helicopter support) for large scale explora- tory program. Wrote geological hydrology sections of environmental im- pact statement. Offshore Drilling, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Participated in conception and design of artificial ice island for offshore drilling program. Duties included obtaining and analyzing subsea soil strength data and working with project engineer to develop design parameters. Kodiak Near Island Bridge - Geologic reconnaissance for proposed site. Bethel to Napakiak Road, Bethel - Project manager responsible for library search, air photo interpretation and field analysis of west terminus of road. MEMBERSHIPS Northwest Mining Association Alaska Geological Society Alaska Miners Society Association of Engineering Geologists KELLY, MICHAEL D., Fisheries Biologist, Research Analyst Position Description Conduct marine and freshwater fishery research in response to university, agency, industry, or other contractual requests. Maintain comprehensive knowledge and current awareness of arctic and subarctic research in marine and freshwater fishery sciences, aquaculture, oceanography, and other related disciplines. Compile and synthesize available knowledge into environmental reports or special papers dealing with Alaskan aqua- tic resource issues. Respond to agency and individual inquiries for information. Born March 24, 1946 Soc. Sec. No. 531-48-6364 Education University of Washington, B.S. Fisheries Biology, 1971. Oregon State University, M.S. Microbiology, 1975. Experience Fisheries Biologist, Research Analyst, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska from March, 1980 to present. Biological Technician, U.S. Department of Interior; Fish and Wild- life Service, Anchorage, Alaska, May, 1979 to March, 1980. Peace Corps Volunteer, Peace Corps/Vista, Santiago, Chile, October, 1975 to March, 1978. Research Assistant, Oregon State University, Corvalis, Oregon, Sep- tember, 1972 to June, 1975. Fisheries Biologist, DOMSEA Farms, Inc., Bremerton, Washington, April to September, 1972. Selected Publications Kelly, Michael D. 1977. The Bacterial Flora of Antarctic Krill (Euphasia superba) and Some of Their Enzymatic Properties. Journal of Food Science. Kelly, Michael D. 1980. Matanuska Glacier photograph. Published in Alaska Magazine. Kelly, Michael D. 1981. Alaska's Trophy Grayling. Published in Fly Fishing the West magazine. Alaska, University, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1980. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction and Operation of the Proposed Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project, Petersburg and Wrangell, Alaska. Report for Robert W. Retherford Associates Division of International Engineering Co., Inc. 1 vol. HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY DAVID E. KLEINER Senior Associate and Head, Geotechnical Department Degrees: Master of Science in Civil Engineering Northwestern University, 1959 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Valparaiso University, 1958 Professional Engineer — Arkansas, !\linois, Texas, Virginia Structural Engineer — ||linois Professional Societies: American Society of Civil Engineers Illinois Society of Professional Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers U.S. Committee on Large Dams International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Society of American Military Engineers Honors: Selected as ‘'Young Engineer of the Year’ in 1969 by the Chicago Chapter, Illinois Society of Professional Engineers. Member of ASCE Soil Dynamics Delegation to the Peoples Republic of China, August 1979. Harza Engineering Company since 1959. Senior Associate, 1978. Associate, 1974. Head, Geotechnical Department, 1979 to date; Foundations and Soil Mechanics Section Head, 1973-79; Assistant Head, 1972-73; Senior Engineer, Foundations and Soil Mechanics Section, 1967-72; Engineer, 1959-61. Experience Highlights: Section and department supervision of more than 50 engineers, geologists, technicians, and draftsmen, on a wide variety of projects including several waste ponds and piles; the Magarin Development in Jordan; the Bath County Pumped-Storage Project in Virginia; the Guri expansion project and the Uribante-Caparo hydroelectric development project in Venezuela; the Yacyreta-Apipe hydroelectric development in Argentina; the Tavera-Bao hydroelectric project in the Dominican Republic; the San Lorenzo hydroelectric project in El Salvador; and the Tilden Tailings Dam in Michigan. Supervision of foundations and soil mechanics work on 105-MW Burfell Project, Iceland; 80-meter high rockfill Cerron Grande Dam, EI Salvador; 600-foot high arch Mossyrock Dam, Washington; San Buenaventura and Rio Lindo Projects, Honduras; and the spillway for the Mangla Project, West Pakistan. DAVID E. KLEINER Project Manager and/or Lead Engineer on numerous industrial waste storage ponds and piles. Supervised studies and preparation of exhibits presented to Consulting Boards for Seneca Pumped-Storage Project, [ Stony Creek Pumped-Storage Project, Bath County Pumped-Storage Project and others. 4 Foundation and embankment design for Rio Lindo Project, Honduras, and for 200-meter high arch Reza Shah —_ Kabir Dam, Iran. | Foundation evaluation of Pedro Miguel Locks, Panama Canal. ~ Preliminary design of earth and rockfill dams and dikes for raising the Guri Dam, the Sandridge Project, New York, [ : and Thorisvatn and Hrauneyjafoss Projects, Iceland. Technical Papers and Articles: ‘ j “Some Practical Considerations for the Static and Dynamic Safety of Embankment Dams,” paper presented in Peking, China, August 1979. oO “Design and Construction of an Embankment Dam to Impound Gypsum Wastes,’ Twelfth International Congress us on Large Dams, March, 1976. “Environmentally Attractive Methods to Store or Use Fly Ash,”” ASCE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, October, 1971. “Rock Mechanics Studies for the Mossyrock Arch Dam,’” ASCE, POWER JOURNAL, January, 1971. “The Upper Reservoir for the Seneca Pumped-Storage Plant,’’ co-author with J. C. Jones, presented at the University of California, March, 1968. “Making Waste Ponds and Piles Safe and Efficient,” WATER AND. SEWAGE WORKS, May, 1965. Series of Lectures on design of small dams to Peace Corps volunteers, March and October, 1966. [ i “An Analysis of Consolidation Data of a Swedish Clay and a Method for Estimating Sample Disturbance,’ unpublished thesis, August, 1959. 2/80 Title Expertise Experience With Firm Curriculum Vitae DAVID J. KROFT Senior Minerals Economist Mineral Economics Economic Geology Geopolitical Analysis Project Manager Evaluation of Southern Pacific Land Company’s mineral resources in southern California for Southern Pacific Land Company. Valuation of the mineral and surface assets of a major United States aggregate and asphalt concrete products producer for a confidential client. The future supply of and demand for uranium for a confidential client. Evaluation and analysis of ERDA and USGS uranium program data published since 1950 for the Electric Power Research Institute. A study to assess the potential environmental, social, and economic effects of continued reliance on land mining to produce metals (cobalt, copper, manganese, and nickel) available from manganese nodules if deep seabed mining does not take place or if it is delayed for the United States Department of Commerce. Mineral resource study, West and East Pearl Rivers, Louisiana and Mississippi (sand and gravel) for the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The future supply of and demand for molybdenum for a confidential client. Cobalt, chromium, and nickel supply, demand, and strategic importance for a confidential client. e The outlook for lead for a confidential client. Determination and assessment of the economic considerations involved in the development of a Utah coal property for a confidential client. Principal Investigator Inventory and market analysis of the potash resources of the Great Salt Lake Desert and Paradox Basin of Utah; evaluation and market analysis of the phos- phate resources of Utah for the United States Bureau of Land Management. Economic analysis of transportation by alternative modes of uranium oxide from various points on the Colorado Plateau of UF, conversion facilities for a con- fidential client. Economic evaluation of the Folkston, Georgia heavy minerals (ilmenite, rutile, and zircon) deposit for a confidential client. - ¢ Northwest Alaska coal resources assessment for the Alaska Power Authority. © Production analysis of the California mining industry for Homestake Mining Company. A study of United States uranium mining capital and operating costs for a con- fidential client. A preliminary economic evaluation of a Texas sand and gravel deposit for a con- fidential client. 8 Dames & Moore : oO Past Experience Academic Background Professional Affiliations Awards and Honors Publications - 2s Studies in exploration geology for many mining companies in the western United States and Canada : e Included evaluations of porphyry copper-molybdenum and lead-zinc-silver deposits. Base Geological Officer, McChord Air Force Base, Washington © Held position while serving in the United States Air Force. B.A., geology and political science, University of Washington M.S., economic geology, University of Washington Ph.D., mineral economics, Stanford University Society of Mining Engineers of AIME, Secretary-Treasurer (Bay Area Section); Peninsula Geologic Society; Northwest Mining Association; National Association of Business Economists; Sigma Xi Evan Just Award, presented by the American Institute of Mining Engineers, Bay Area Section, 1976 “The Geopolitics of Non-Energy Minerals” “Future Uranium Supplies Vs.‘Demand: The Strategic Position of the United States” “The Strategic Position of the United States with Respect to Uranium Supply and Demand” LABELLE, JOSEPH C., Senior Research Analyst, Geomorphology Position Description Provides contract project leadership for interdisciplinary natural resource and/or environmental science efforts of the center designed to analyze, synthesize, or otherwise solve applied science or resource problems for governmental agencies, public interest groups, or private sector firms or corporations. Directs and conducts geological science projects of the center. Participates as a project resource investigator or scientist in selected and assigned projects of the center. , Participates in the organization, retrieval, and dissemination of natural resource and environmental science information and data and in the operation of a system of resource and science information. Pilots and operates project aircraft as required. Participates in center efforts to develop new, interesting, accurate, and highly communicative approaches to the presentation of Alaskan environmental science, natural resource, history, and cultural subjects in order to further their understanding and to enhance the educational teaching processes involved in the transfer of this knowledge. Born July 29, 1937 Soc. Sec. No. 026-28-7843 Education University of Massachusetts, B.S., Geology. 1969. University of Michigan, M.S. program, thesis submitted and accepted; 13 credits completed. M.S. Thesis: Environmental studies on Mount Logan, Yukon Territory, Canada; May, 1971. Experience Sr. Research Analyst, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Infor- mation and Data Center, Anchorage. January 1, 1974 to present. Project Manager and Environmental Investigator, Mt. Logan High Altitude Research Project, Arctic Institute of North America. 1968-73. Glaciological Investigator, North Slope Ice Investigation Project of Polar Expeditions, Inc., Arctic Institute of North America. 1970. Investigator in glaciological--oceanographic winter voyage of the ice- breaker CCGS Louis S. St. Laurent, Arctic Institute of North America. 1972. Project Leader, Mountaineering Equipment Research Program, Arctic Institute of North America. 1972. Project Leader, investigation of fill materials and aggregate resources, under contract of U.S. Navy, Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves, Arctic Institute of North America. 1972-73. Significant projects at AEIDC ue Alaska Regional Profiles. Compilation of the physical, biological, and human environment of each of Alaska's regions (Southcentral, Arctic, Southwest, Southeast, Northwest, Yukon). Prepared for Office of the Governor. 1974-76. Arctic Atlas. Project leader. Compilation of physical, biological, and human environment of the Arctic region of Alaska. Prepared under SeaGrant. 1974-75. Chukchi Sea Coastal Environmental. Project Leader. Compilation of the known physical and biological environment of the Chukchi Sea Coast and continental shelf from Bering Strait to Icy Cape. Prepared under SeaGrant. 1975. Environmental Assessment of Gulf Interstate Proposed Gas Pipeline. Assessment of the environmental impacts of proposed pipeline construction on the Alaska Highway route to the lower United States. Prepared for Gulf Interstate. 1976. Arctic Regional Socioeconomic profile: Arctic Community Profiles. Assessment of probable socioeconomic impact of petroleum develop- ment in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. Also, compila- tion of known physical and biological environments of each of Alaska's Arctic communities. Prepared for U.S. Geological Survey, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Task Force. 1977-78. Arctic Coastal Zone Environment. Compilation of series of maps showing physical and biological environment of Alaska's arctic coast and near offshore region. Prepared for North Slope Borough. 1977. Environmental Assessment of Artificial Island Construction. Assess- ment of environmental effects of construction, operation, and aban- donment of a man-made gravel island near Prudhoe Bay. Prepared for Sohio Petroleum Company. 1978. Southcentral Coastal Fish and Wildlife Impact Folios. Contributed physical parameters relating to fish and wildlife impacts relating to coastal petroleum development. Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1978-79. 10. LL. 12. 13. 14. dD s 16. Environmental Assessment of Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project. Assessment of the environmental effects of development of Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, northern Kodiak Island. Prepared for Kodiak Electric Association. 1979. Second Environmental Assessment of Artificial Island Construction. Assessment of environmental effects of summer season construction and multi-season operation and abandonment of a manmade gravel island off the Sagavanirktok River delta near Prudhoe Bay. Prepared for Sohio Petroleum Company. 1979. Environmental Training Video Tapes Series. Project Leader. Prepared a series of four one-hour video tapes designed to provide environmental training for petroleum exploration personnel, to meet State of Alaska stipulations. Subject titles included: The Physical Environment of Arctic Alaska; The Biological Environment of Arctic Alaska; The Inupiat People of Arctic Alaska; Man in the Arctic. Prepared for Mobil Oil Corporation. 1980. Oil Spill Scenario Analyses. Analyzed potential environmental effects resulting from several scenarios for oil spills in different Alaskan environments. Prepared for ARCTEC, Inc. 1980. Review of Project Waterflood Environmental Impact Statement. Reviewed the EIS for a proposed program to increase oil production from Prudhoe Bay Field by injection of sea water into oil wells to increase well pressure. Prepared for the US Army Corps of Engineers. 1980. Environmental Assessment of Tyee Lake Hydroelectic Project. Assessment of environmental effects of the development of Tyee Lake hydroelectric project, near the cities of Petersburg and Wrangell, southeast Alaska. Prepared for International Engineering Company, Inc. 1980. Environmental Base Studies for Beluga Methanol Project. Performed a series of field studies related to geomorphology and fisheries habitats in the Beluga Coal Fields on the west side of Cook Inlet. Prepared for DOWL Engineering Co., Inc. 1980. Public Inquiry Advisory Services. General environmental consulta- tion and advice to group and individual public inquiries. Lectures and discussions to groups on AEIDC services and activities, and on environmental subjects. Ongoing. Selected Publications LaBelle, J.C. 1971. Mt. Logan high altitude research project, 1970. American Alpine Journal, 17(2) :382-384. . 1972. Environmental studies on Mt. Logan, Yukon Territory, 1968. Arctic Institute of North America High Mountain Environment Project Technical Report 4. . 1972. Mountaineering Equipment Evaluation, Arctic Institute of North America Final Report to U.S. Army Natick Laboratories, October. 63 pp. . 1973. Fill materials and aggregate near Barrow, Naval Petroleum Reserve no. 4, Alaska, Arctic Institute of North America Final Report to Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves, con- tract NOd-9915 (72-2). 146 pp. plus appendices. - 1973. Fill materials and aggregate in the Cape Halkett region, Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4, Alaska, Arctic Institute of North America report to Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves, contract NOd-9915 (72-2). 52 pp. plus: appendices. . 1974, "Snow accumulation in the summit region, Mt. Logan, Yukon," Icefield Ranges Research Project Scientific Results. Vol. 4. . 1975. Chukchi Sea: Bering Strait to Icy Cape, Physical and Bio- logical Character of Alaskan Coastal Zone and Marine Environment. Coord. by J.C. LaBelle, AEIDC. . . 1976. Chapter 13: "Fill materials between Barrow and Colville River, Alaska," in: Assessment of the Arctic Marine Environment: Selected Topics. Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska. 161-172 pp. LaBelle, J.C., and Houston, C.S., 1970. High altitude research atop Canada's highest peak. American Alpine Journal, 17(1):96-104. Marcus, M., and LaBelle, J.C. 1970. Summer climatic observations at the 5360 meter level, Mt. Logan, Yukon. Arctic and Alpine Research, 2(2) 3103-114. Alaska, University, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1979. Nunakput:' Our Land; Environmental Processes in Arctic Alaska. J.C. LaBelle, ed. 312 pp. Also contributions in: Houston, C.S., 1970. Clinical research at 17,500 feet. Medical World News, 11(1):22-30. Hancock, L., 1974. Medical research at 17,500 feet. Canadian Geograph— ical Journal, 90(3):4-11. . Statistics Canada, 1976. Northern research. Statistics Canada Year- book, 1976. 45th Ed., 110-111. Hickok, D.M., Arctic Deserts, chapter in: Deserts of the world. In press. Scientific papers presented: Alaska Science Conference, 1968. High altitude environmental studies. Whitehorse, Yukon. Symposium on the Natural. and Physiological Environment: of the St. Elias Mountains, 1971. Characteristics of the Mt. Logan snow cover above 5300 meters. Ann Arbor, Michigan. Third International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, 1975. Fill materials between Barrow and ‘Colville River, Alaska. Fairbanks, Alaska. Professional Memberships Alaska Geological Society Society of the Sigma Xi Arctic Institute of North America American Alpine Club HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY BAUM K. LEE Senior Hydrologist Degrees: Ph.D. in Civil Engineering — Hydraulics Colorado State University, 1973 Master of Science in Civil Engineering — Hydraulics Colorado State University, 1969 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, 1963 Languages: English, Korean and working knowledge of Chinese, German, Japanese, and Spanish Professional Societies: American Geophysical Union American Society of Civil Engineers Korean Association of Hydrologic Sciences Korean Society of Civil Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1973. Hydrology and Groundwater Section: Senior Hydrologist, 1976 to date. Water Resources Engineer, 1973-1975. Experience Highlights: Supervises, coordinates, and performs flood and storm analyses, sedimentation and erosion studies, stochastic hydrology, mine hydrology, mathematical modeling, and determination of water availability for domestic and overseas projects. Resident Hydrologist, Ecuador and Peru, for the Puyango-Tumbes Multipurpose Project to provide irrigation, water, hydroelectric power, flood control, and fisheries development. Prepared hydrology report, supervised counterpart staffs for hydrologic studies, and trained local hydrologists. As Leza Hydrologist, supervised evaluations of baseline hydrology and of hydrologic input for water-control plans and preparation of monitoring programs/ facilities for coal and uranium mines (Wyoming). Planned and supervised data collection and analysis to determine causes and mitigation measures for power plant intake sedimentation problem (Ohio). Established a sedimentation laboratory and a streamflow and sediment measurement program, and trained local hydrologists, for the El Nispero Hydroelectric Project, Honduras. Served as Project Manager for the Receiving Water Study, Garrison Diversion Unit, North Dakota. Studied effects of irrigation return inflows on 22 water-quality parameters in 1,400 miles of streams by using mathematical models. BAUM K. LEE 1967 to 1973: Colorado State University. Graduate Research Assistant working for the U.S. Geological Survey. Major research projects participated in were: dependent and independent variables in sediment transport; resistance to flow in alluvial channels; dispersion characteristics of sand particles in an alluvial stream; storchasticity in transport and dispersion of sediment particles; and Hurst phenomena of dye dispersion natural rivers. These projects included general laboratory and field work in connection with the collection reduction, and analysis of sediment transport data using a large recirculating flume and a high-speed digital computer. 1966 to 1967: Korean Engineering Consultant Corporation, South Korea. Group Leader, Hydrology Group, Water Resources Division. Supervised five junior civil engineers for hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for design of a multipurpose dam on Keum River. 1964 to 1966: Active military duty in the Eighth U.S. Army Support Command as a Korean Augmentation to the United States Army. 1963 to 1964: Korean Engineering Consultant Corporation, Seoul, Korea. Junior Civil Engineer, Hydrology Group, Water Resources Division. Handled flood analysis, statistical estimation of turbine discharge, and installation and subsequent analysis of rain and stream gauges for feasibility studies of hydroelectric power projects. Technical Papers and Articles: “Laboratory Study of an Alluvial Stream at One-Foot Depth,’’ M.S. Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 52 pp., 1969. “A Review of Some Stochastic Models for Sediment Transport,” (unpublished), Civil Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 80 pp., 1972. “Stochastic Characteristics of Particle Movement Over a Dune Bed,” with H. E. Jobson, International Symposium on River Mechanics, Bangkok, Thailand, Proceedings Vol. 1, 15 pp., 1973. “Stochastic Analysis of Particle Movement Over a Dune Bed,"’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 216 pp., 1973. “Stochastic Analysis of Dune Bed Profiles,’” with H. E. Jobson, Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE 100 (HYT) pp. 849-867, 1974. “Stochastic Analysis of Particle Movement Over a Dune Bed,” with H. E. Jobson, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, 221 pp., 1975. “Stochastic Analysis of Dune Bed Profiles (Closure),’’ with H. E. Jobson, Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE 101 (HY. 11), pp. 1445-1447, 1975. NN] “Stochastic Analysis of Particle Movement Over a Dune Bed,” with H. E. Jobson, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1040, Washington, D.C., 72 pp., 1977. 6/80 HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY LOUIS F. LEVY Head, Estimating and Scheduling Section Date of Birth: Citizenship: Degree: Languages: Professional Experience: April 1980 to Date: September 1971 to April 1980: September 1968 to September 1971 December 18, 1927 Bolivia Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, 1951 English and Spanish Harza Engineering Company, Chicago. Head, Esti- mating and Scheduling Section. Responsible for preparing construction estimates and schedules. Also involved in all aspects of construction planning. Has prepared construction estimates and schedules for the following Harza projects: Yacyreta, Argentina and Paraguay; Mayfield Fourth Unit, City of Tacoma, Washington; Buffalo, New York, Light Rail Rapid Transit, Amherst Station; Hadley Falls Unit 2 Turbines, Holyoke, Massachusetts; Sullivan Lake, Washington; Foothills Project, Denver, Colorado Water Board. Construction Aggregates Corporation, Chicago, Illinois. Chief Estimator/Assistant Vice President Prepared and presented bids, cost estimating for hydraulic dredging, land reclamation and beach replenishment with hopper and hydraulic dredges. Handled cost estimating for bridges, breakwaters and waterfront structures in the United States and overseas. Prepared cost analysis for rock concrete and aggregate production in the U.S. and overseas. Construction Aggregates Corporation, Kingston, Jamaica. Construction Manager Supervised construction management activities for the following Caribbean projects: Rio Cobre Floodway Project, Kingston, Jamaica -- Involved with the construction of earthfill dikes, irrigation bridges and flood control structures. Portmore Development Project, — LOUIS F. LEVY Head, Estimating and Scheduling Section September 1968 to September 1971 (Continued) January 1968 to September 1968: September 1964 to January 1968: March 1964 to September 1964: February 1963 to March 1964: September 1961 to February 1963: Portmore, Jamaica -- Covered land and housing development. Rodney Bay Development, Saint Lucia -- Involved landfill, drainage and road construction. Castries ~Gros Ilet Highway, Saint Lucia. Macco Corporation, Paramount California Chief Engineer and Chief Estimator. . Supervised construction management activities for all U.S. based subsidiaries of parent firms. Prepared and presented claims involving the Guri hydroelectric project in Venezuela, Dead Sea project in Middle East and the American River Project in the U.S. Macco Corporation, Kaiser Engineers Joint Venture, Paramount, California Guri Hydroelectric Project - Venezuela, Chief Engineer. Involved in all phases of construction engineering management. Prepared schedules construction drawings, designed temporary structures. Supervised subcontractors; participated in labor relations. Macco Corporation, Kaiser Engineers (Joint Venture), Paramount, California. Assistant Project Manager Participated in activities leading to the construction of 45 miles of earthfill dikes in the Dead Sea region for water evaporation and potash production. Macco Corporation; Paramount, California . Project Manager, Middle East Region. Responsible for the construction of canals and auxiliary structures. Macco Corporation; Paramount, California Construction Engineer and Senior Estimator Involved in cost analysis and bid preparation for the following heavy construction projects: Kremasta Dam in Greece; Angat Dam, Philippines; American River, U.S.; McLoud Tunnels, U.S.; Oned Nevanna Dan, Tunisia; Pudahuel Airport, Chile; Canaveral Hydro, Nicaragua; San Luis Dam, California; Rio Lindo Project, Honduras. LOUIS F. LEVY Head, Estimating and Scheduling Section January 1961 to September 1961: September 1959 to January: May 1951 to April 1957: Macco Corporation/H.B. Zachry Company (Joint Venture) Paramount, California Paloma Dam - Chile Handled cost estimates for proposal’ presentations, analyzed construction methods and equipment. Assisted in negotiations for joint venture agreements and government negotiations. Thompson-Cornwall, subsidiary of Macco Pan~-Pacific Corporation; New York, N.Y. Guayabo Dam - El Salvador (Units 4 & 5) Responsible for field engineering for tunnels, powerhouse surge chamber, and roads. Designed temporary structures; supervised subcontractors. Thompson~Cornwall, subsidiary of Macco Pan-Pacific Corporation; New York, N.Y. Field Engineer/Construction Supervisor. Held numerous field and supervisory positions early in career. i — Title Expertise Experience With Firm Past Experience I-so Curriculum Vitae GEORGE Y. LOU Senior Meteorologist II Climatology and Meteorology Air Quality Computer Applications Project Manager and/or Principal Investigator © Meteorological and air quality monitoring network design. © Climatological, meteorological, and air quality impact assessment studies for nuclear power plants including environmental report and safety analysis report preparations. e Air quality impact evaluations for major petrochemical and oil transporta- tion projects including PSD (Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality) permit application preparations. © Meteorological and air quality studies for transportation-related projects such as shopping mall, highway construction, etc. ® Variable trajectory dispersion model development. e Technical review of meteorological and air quality work. e Expert witness at various public hearings. Consulting Meteorologist, United Engineers and Constructors, Inc. e Supervision of meteorological and air quality staff. © Climatological, meteorological, and air quality studies for major nuclear and fossil power plant projects. e Evaluation of the effects of chemical discharge and drift from cooling towers on the environment. . e Evaluation of the effects of cooling tower on precipitation and cloud formation. © Site selection studies and meteorological and air quality monitoring network design. : Senior Meteorologist, Northrop Corporation © Development of environmental criteria for use in space vehicle design and operation. © Development of atmospheric models for Earth and Mars. Research. Assistant, Florida State University * Convective cloud studies using satellite photographs. _ Dames & Moore Academic Background Professional Affiliations Publications Language Proficiency Research Associate, Naval Institute of Technology, Taiwan e Sea-air interaction and ocean current studies. Instructor, Naval Academy, Taiwan e Taught courses in navigation and meteorology for the Department of Applied Sciences. B.S. in marine sciences, Naval Academy, Taiwan M.S. in meteorology, Florida State University Graduate studies in fluid mechanics at University of Alabama Certificate in air pollution meteorology, Department of HEW American Meteorological Society; Air Pollution Control Association Several technical reports and papers on atmospheric model development pub- lished by NASA; also in various journals such as Sciences, Geophysics, and Space Research Chinese DANIEL A. LYONS, P.E. Honolulu, Hawaii - September 23, 1922 EDUCATION: University of Washington, B.S.M.E., 1948 MSS.M.E., 1964 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: (ELECTRICAL) State of New York, 1953, No. 27792 - State of Washington, 1963, No. 8700 State of Wisconsin, 1967, No. E-10479 State of Alaska, 1968, No. 1741-E PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Institute of Electrical and Electronics 1967 to date 1965-1966 1964-1965 1963-1964 1955-1963 Engineers Washington Society of Professional Engineers Electric League of the Pacific Northwest Thompson; Miller & Lyons Engineers, Inc. Seattle, Washington Electrical Engineer Crown Zellerbach Corporation Seattle, Washington Electrical Engineer Design and field supervision of electrical systems for pulp and paper mills ’ The Austin. Company Seattle, Washington Electrical Engineer Design of industrial power systems and commercial building electrical systems Graduate Studies General Electric Company Seattle, Washington Sales and Application Engineer for power generation, transmission and distribution equipment, motors, control, and instrumentation for industrial and electric utility. customers D STEFANO & ASSOCIATES _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS Daniel A. Lyons (continued) 1948-1955 General Electric Company . Schenectady, New York Systems Engineer for lumber, paper and textile industries Test Engineer for aircraft gas turbines, armament systems, power transformers, steam turbine generators and industrial controls HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY RICHARD L. MEAGHER Vice President and Head, Water and Energy Planning and Design Department Degree: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of Notre Dame, 1956 Professional Engineer ||linois and Virginia Professional Societies: American Society of Civil Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1956. Vice President, 1981. Senior Associate, 1978. Associate, 1974. Head, Water and Energy Planning and Design Department, 1979 to date. Resources Development Department: Head, 1978-79; Assistant Head, 1977-78; Head, Power Resources Section, 1972-76; Senior Engineer, Planning and Civil Design, 1962-72; Structural Design Engineer, 1956-62; Planning Engineer, 1956-58. Experience Highlights: Directs, supervises, and reviews the work of engineers and drafters in planning and design of the development of water and energy resources. Assignments include master planning, prefeasibility, and feasibility studies and design of water resource projects. Project Manager for feasibility studies and FERC license application for the Brumley Gap and Powell Mountain Pumped-Storage Projects in Virginia, each with an installed capacity of more than 3,000 MW. Project Manager for the following studies in Honduras: inventory of hydroelectric resources in eastern Honduras in which seven sites with a total installed capacity of 1,700 MW were identified; feasibility of El Nispero Hydro- electric Project; feasibility of Quimistan Valley Irrigation Project; and Flood Control Master Plan for Sula Valley. Project Manager for appraisal of underground pumped-storage potential in central Illinois. Project Manager for the prefeasibility study of a 450-MW hydroelectric development on the Rio Chimbo in Ecuador. Project Engineer for the study of the Patia River Basin in Southwest Colombia. The study involved identification of all sites having potential for construction, preliminary evaluation to determine the most favorable sites, and selection of two sites for feasibility study. The potential total development would be about 3,000 MW. Feasibility study for the initial project with installed capacity of 1,500 MW has been completed. Project Engineer for two hydroelectric planning studies in Bolivia. The first study recommended a plan of develop- ment for a reach of the Rio Grande in Bolivia about 350 km long with a fall of about 1,000 meters. The study identified nine potential hydroelectric project sites with a total installed capacity of 3,000 MW. The second study was for a prefeasibility report to evaluate two small hydroelectric projects in southern Bolivia which could serve a community with a population of about 30,000. RICHARD L. MEAGHER Project Engineer for the feasibility study of the Hrauneyjafoss Project in Iceland which can serve expected growth in industrial load. The project will have an installed capacity of 210 MW, Project Engineer during planning phase of the Rio Caroni hydroelectric development in Venezuela involving four sites with a potential of over 15,000 MW. Supervised planning studies aimed at (1) appraising the overall develop- ment and (2) determining the technical and economic feasibility of a program for staged expansion at two sites which have been partially developed. Project Engineer for the feasibility phase of the Reza Shah Kabir multipurpose river project in Iran, which includes a 200-m arch dam and a 1,000-MW power plant, and provides an irrigation water supply to 40,000 hectares of agricultural land. Senior Planning Engineer involved in preparation and supervision of planning studies for hydroelectric projects, Studies included project layouts and estimates, power production, and economic analyses. Also supervised design work and preparation of construction drawings for powerhouse, spillway, and diversion structures for hydroelectric projects, 5/81 HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES DUANE L. MILLER Associate Engineer Mr. Miller has 12 years of experience as project geotechnical engineer on a variety of structures such as high-rise buildings in San Francisco and industrial projects on Guam and in.Alaska. He has special training and experience in arctic engi- neering, seismology and soil-structure interaction under earthquake loading. EDUCATION Graduate study, Engineering Management, University of Alaska M.S., Geological Engineering, University of California, Berkeley - 1968 B.S., Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley - 1967 EXPERIENCE 1969 - present: Harding-Lawson Associates 1973 - present: Chief Engineer, Alaska Office 1969-1972: Chief Engineer, Guam Office 1968: University of California (research assistant) REGISTRATION Civil Engineer - Alaska, California, Hawaii, Guam REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Geotechnical Hazard Evaluation, Municipality of Anchorage - Project engineer responsible for mapping zones of seismic activity. North and West Docks, Prudhoe Bay - During investigation for 5000-foot long causeway served as project engineer. Modules and Flare Pad, Flow Station III, Prudhoe Bay - Project engineer during foundation investigation. Gravel Island Design, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Geotechnical evaluation of conceptual ‘design in 40 feet of water. Joint Federal/State Lease Sale Area Data Collection, Beaufort Sea, Alaska - Project manager for on-ice drilling study to gather data on marine sediments for evaluation of preliminary design of offshore structures. Supervised 32-man mobile base camp. > HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES Duane L. Miller - Page Two Public Health Service Hospital, Bethel - Project engineer; supervising sustained load tests of driven H piles. Long-Term Thermal Monitoring of Adfreeze Piles, Prudhoe Bay. Remedial Foundation Work of Various Structures in Prudhoe Bay, Selawik, Anchorage, Barrow. Federal Office Building, Anchorage - Project engineer; foundation in- vestigation and seismicity evaluation. , Trans-Alaska Oi] Pipeline - Provided consultation during field design changes and review of vertical support members. Kandik Basin Oil Exploration, Alaska - Responsible for remote site investigations and foundation construction. MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers Alaska Geological Society Alaska Ground Water Association American.Geophysical Union Society of American Military Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute PUBLICATIONS Miller, D.L., and Shearer, G.B., "Geotechnical Investigation, Beaufort Sea - 1979", ASME Energy Technology Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, February, 1980. Miller, D.L., and Bruggers, D.E., "Soil and Permafrost Conditions in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea", Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May, 1980. JOHN STUART MILLER, P.E.: - Spokane, Washington ~ August 19, 1915 EDUCATION: Washington State University, B.S.M.E., 1940 University of Washington, Evening Classes, Mathematics and Elementary Nuclear Physics REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: (MECHANICAL ) / State of Washington, 1948, No. 348] State of Alaska, 1955, No. 431-E State of Oregon, 1957, No. 4202 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: ‘Washington Society of Professional Engineers 1967 to date 1964-1966 1962-1964 1961-1962 1959-1961 American Society of Mechanical Engineers American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers Thompson, Miller & Lyons Engineers, Inc. Seattle, Washington , Mechanical Engineer John Stuart Miller, Consulting Mechanical Engineer Seattle, Washington ; Design of power, process and utility piping for pulp and paper mills Ralph R. Stefano Consulting Engineers Fairbanks, Alaska Associate Engineer Design and engineering supervision of steam heating and power plant, utilidors and mechanical. systems for buildings John. Stuart Miller, Consulting Mechanical Engineer Seattle, Washington / Design and layout services for piping contractors Rubens & Pratt, Consulting Engineers Seattle, Washington Mechanical Engineer Design of power and process piping for pulp and paper mill STEFANO & ASSOCIATES _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS John Stuart Miller (continued) 1951-1959 1950-1951 1948-1950 1947-1948 1945-1947 1940-1945 Stern & Towne, Consulting Engineers Seattle, Washington Mechanical Engineer and Associate Design and engineering supervision of commercial and industrial environmental systems, process, utility and steam plants Design and layout services for contractors Feasibility study for fuel selection Rautman Plumbing & Heating Company Seattle, Washington Engineer Assistant to Superintendent, Davis Dam, Arizona Installation of hydro-electric power plant piping The Alaska Railroad, Seattle Design Office Seattle, Washington Assistant Engineer Design of steam power plant, diesel-electric power plant and utility distribution systems Lincoln Bouillon & Associates Seattle, Washington Mechanical Designer . Design of institutional boiler plant and utilidor piping Great Northern Railway Company St. Paul, Minnesota Supervisor, Mechanical Department Northern Pacific Railway Company St. Paul, Minnesota Trainee and Machinist, Mechanical Department Curriculum Vitae JOHN W. MORSELL Title Ecologist Expertise Ecology of northern regions, aquatic biology, assessment and mitigation of biological impacts, management of multidisci- plinary environmental impact assessment projects. Experience e Principal investigator wetland and terrestrial habitat With Firm mapping and impact assessment, Wasilla By-pass location study EIS. e Consultant relative to protection of fish resources during design and construction planning for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System. e Project manager and field investigator for an environmental assessment of a proposed hydroelectric project near Dil- lingham, Alaska, with field emphasis on evaluation of aquatic resources. e Ecological input to a major study of natural resource ‘protection as it relates to petroleum development in Alaska. e Ecological input to the Prudhoe Bay Waterflood project environmental impact analysis including aspects of terres- trial biology, wetlands, habitat mapping, and habitat eval- uation. e Principal investigator for environmental aspects during a reconnaissance study of five potential hydroelectric power sites near Haines, Alaska. e Project manager and field investigator for a detailed program of environmental baseline collection and impact assessment relating to the City of Valdez port expansion project. e Principal investigator for three biological baseline stud- ies relating to proposed refinery development in Valdez: 1) analysis of freshwater aquatic habitats, 2) estuarine dis- persion of salmon fry, 3) mammals within the project area. e Project manager and field investigator for a study of fish streams along the route of the proposed Alcan gas pipeline. Past e« Alyeska Pipeline Service Company - environmental special- Experience ist, 1974-1978. Wide variety of environmental responsi- bilities including impact assessment and reporting, en- vironmental engineering, environmental quality assurance, oil spill contingency planning, administration of contin- gency programs, and personnel training. Conducted numerous field surveys concerned with the delineation of biological resources within aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Investi- gated reports of problem animals and conducted animal deterrent programs. Dames & Moore Awards Professional Affiliations Academic Background Technical Reports and Publications e University of Montana - teaching assistant, 1971-1973. « University of Montana - research assistant, 1972. Conducted a study of small mammal distribution and energetics. Funded by the Coniferous Forest Ecosystem Study Group of the International Biological Program. e Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - fishery research biologist, 1968-1971. Responsible for planning and exe- cuting applied sport fishery research projects. Major research effort involved a study of the factors affecting year-class stength in warm water fish populations. Con- ducted routine limnological sampling of five study lakes. Partial responsibility for the management of the field research station. e University of Wisconsin ~ Milwaukee - teaching assistant, 1966-1968. e University of Wisconsin Laboratory of Limnology, 1965. Assisted on various aquatic research projects, particularly in relation to telemetry of fish movements. Fellowship from Center for Great Lakes Studies, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 1966-1968. Ecolgical Society of America American Fisheries Society 1971-1973 University of Montana; graduate study, emphasis on mammalian ecology and behavior, wildlife biology, and sta- tistics. 1966-1968 University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; M.S. in zool- ogy, emphasis on limnology and fishery biology. 1962-1966 University of Wisconsin; B.S. in zoology. Morsell, J., J. Houghton, M. Bell, 1981. Fish protection strategies for the design and construction of the Alaska seg- ment of the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company. _Morsell, J., S. Parker, D. Erikson, L. Peterson, and P. Knode, 1981. Lake Elva hydroelectric project ~ Environmental Report. Dames & Moore. Prepared for R.W. Beck and Associates, Inc. Morsell, J., 1980. Terrestrial habitat mapping and evaluation for Prudhoe Bay Waterflood project EIS (Appendix L). Dames & Moore. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Hemming, J., G. Harrison, D. Lees, J. Morsell, W. Wade, D. Jones, and C. Fahl, 1979. Environmental assessment - City of Valdez port expansion project. Dames & Moore. Prepared for City of Valdez. Morsell, J., 1979. The mammals of Port Valdez. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Alaska Petrochemical Company. Morsell, J., 1979. Freshwater aquatic habitats of the Valdez area. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Alaska Petrochemical Company. Morsell, J. and G. Perkins, 1979. Salmon fry dispersion in eastern Port Valdez. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Alaska Petrochemical Company. Hemming, J., J. Houghton, and J. Morsell, 1978. Field validation of fish streams between the Canadian border and Delta Junction. Dames & Moore. Prepared for Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company. Morsell, J., 1971. Walleye fry-plankton relationship in Escanaba Lake. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Federal Aid Progress Report. Morsell, J., 1970. Food Habits and growth of young-of-the- year walleyes from Escanaba Lake. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Research Report #56. Morsell, J., 1968. Food habits and seasonal fat condition of the alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus, in Lake Michigan. M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. Norden, C.R. and J. Morsell, 1968. Food habits of the alewife in Lake Michigan. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Great Lakes Research 1968. The Renewable Energy Group BACKGROUND Mr. Newell is a civil engineer with over six years of experi- ence working with utilities. His broad energy background in- cludes extensive experience in design of systems and struc- tures in remote villages in Alaska. He has worked on village energy studies and community planning, performed detailed designs for conserva- tion and alternative energy systems, provided construction Management and supervision, Start-up assistance, and oper- ations of maintenance training. Mr. Newell is currently presi- dent of Wind Systems Engi- neering, Inc. As head of a small consulting firm he has shown himself a very capable manager and businessman. His company has taken the lead in innovative technologies for electric production and energy conservation in Alaska, having designed more alternative en- ergy systems than any other firm in the state. Mr. Newell's background as a design engineer for the Alaska Area Native Health Service brought him considerable exper- ience with bush construction problems and solutions. He de- signed several large buildings and water and sewer systems while being responsible for the wind energy research and de- velopment work of the service. He then became Wind Energy Projects Director and oversaw the design and construction of several wind systems. Mr. Newell is presently an ad- junct Professor at the Anchor- age Community College where he MARK A. NEWELL, M.S. WIND ENERGY ENGINEER teaches a 3 unit course enti- tled "A Survey of Alaskan Al- ternative Energy". EDUCATION Loyola Marymount University B.S. Civil Engineering 1977 Stanford University M.S. Civil Engineering 1978 (Major emphasis on Energy and Power) HONORS Tau Beta Pi -- National Eng. Honor Society Alpha Sigma Nu -- National Jesuit Honor Society Who's Who in American Col- leges and University 1976 & 1977 Professional Affiliations American Wind Energy Asso- ciation -- American Society of Civil Engineers -- National Society of Professional Engi- neers -- Alaska Professional De- sign Council Experience Mr. Newell has served as Pres- ident of Wind Systems Engin- eering and is responsible for the following projects: © Unalakleet Electrical Coopera- tive Wind Farm: 3-10kw wind turbines intertied directly into a small diesel grid. o Sheldon Point Attached Wind- generators-Individual battery systems for. entire village using towers attached to pil- ing foundation. Phase I-8 houses. o Skagway Treatment Plant Wind generator - a 10kw windgen- erator connected to the util- ity grid though the Sewage T.P.; Power Factor correctors and load matching used on pumps and bldg. loads; compu- ter based data collection system. Pilot Station Wind Energy Project - a battery charging 10kw windgenerator for power in community building, wat- ering point, library, and jail. Project included: su- perinsulated battery room, wattmiser flourescent retro- fit, thermal dumps. Army National Guard Armorys-— designed 2kw utility intertie for Bethel Armory; remote battery charger for St. Mary's; remote battery char- ger for Elim & Togiak. Reconnaissance Study of Energy Alternatives for Shungnak, Kiana, and Ambler - for Alaska Power Authority: project manager. Pribilof Island School Dis- trict Planning Study Compre- hensive energy audit, wind data collection system, energy alternative recommen- dations for St. Paul and St. George. Nelson Lagoon Monitoring System-microcomputer data collection of 20kw utility intertied wind generator and associated analysis for per- formance of diesel/wind grid system. MARK A. NEWELL, M.S. WIND ENERGY ENGINEER PAGE TWO o Village Scale Integrated ° ° Energy System-Energy plan for Bering Strait Native Corpora- tion including the villages of Brevig Mission, Diomede, Golovin, Koyuk, Shishmaref, St. Michael, Stebbins, Teller and Unalakleet. Northwest Community College -taught two weekend seminars on wind energy and conserva- tion in the Nome region. Set up wind energy curriculum in- cluding installation of 10kw wind generator. Alaskan Wind Energy Handbook -authored comprehensive text on design, economics, instal- lation and maintenance of wind systems in Alaska. Handbook prepared under contract to Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - Re- search Section. o Adak Elementary School Wind Demonstration Project - de- signed 2kw utility intertie wind system as educational tool for new school. Chevak and Hooper Bay - provided project consultation during design phases; worked with Rural CAP on utility intertie and foundation de- sign. Wind Energy Lecture at Craig- Lecture on use of wind energy in Southeast Alaska given at Sealaska annual meeting. Mr. Newell was a Design Engi - eer and Wind Energy Program Director for the Public Health Service and responsible for the following projects: o Designed a superinsulated wa- sheteria/clinic/office/garage facility forthe’ City. of McGrath. The building in- cluded: thermal airlocks, energy-efficient appliances and lighting and heat recov- ery devices. o Gambell prepared preliminary design, energy audit, final design, construction plans and specifications for four wind generators tied with synchronous inventors to AVEC diesel generators. o Designed a high reliability remote wind system to provide power without battery storage for the City of Nikolski's piped water system. o Takotna washeterial/watering point-designed superinsulated pre-fab building heated with wood stove and use of heat recovery devices. o Shishmaref, Teller, Tuluksak and Tununak - provide preli- minary site evaluation and monitoring system package for wind energy utilization. As a graduate student Mr. Newell authored "Alternative Energy Futures-Wind Energy Conversion Systems" published by the Institute for Energy Studies, Stanford, California as part of subcontract with Argonne National Laboratories for Soft Energy Paths Study. MARK A. NEWELL, M.S. WIND ENERGY ENGINEER PAGE THREE Mr. Newell also worked for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in Commercial/Indus- trial Water and Energy Conser- vation Programs for two years, where he visited facilities and performed audits of their conservation programs. HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY L. DOW NICHOL Head, Hydroelectric Planning Section Degrees: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of Illinois, 1953 Bachelor of Law The George Washington University, 1959 Languages: English and working knowledge of Spanish Professional Engineer — ||linois Professional Societies: American Society of Civil Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1960. Head, Hydroelectric Planning Section, 1979 to date. Resources Development Department, Power Resources Section: Senior Engineer, 1969-79; Resident Engineer, Colombia, S.A., 1973-75; Engineer, 1960-69. Experience Highlights: Directed master planning studies of hydroelectric development of the Lower Caroni River, Venezuela. Directed feasibility assessments of six small, low-head hydro projects in Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois. Directed project planning studies for the Powell Mountain and Brumley Gap Pumped-Storage Projects, Virginia. Coordinated the project planning studies of the storage reservoir, trans-basin conveyance, and hydroelectric power features of the bi-national Puyango-Tumbes Irrigation Project, Peru and Ecuador. Conducted an appraisal of pumped-storage potential of the proposed Oattara Hydroelectric Development, Egypt. Resident Engineer for the 1,700-MW Sogamoso Project, Colombia, S.A., through the feasibility study. Directed the optimization studies to select the generating capacity and energy storage capacity of the 2,100-MW Bath County Pumped-Storage Project, Virginia. Directed a program of map studies and field reconaissance to identify potential pumped-storage project sites in Maryland and West Virginia and to compare them on the basis of economics and environmental factors. Directed studies of possible addition of from 500 to 4,500-MW of pumped-storage generating capacity to the basic storm overflow containment alternatives for the Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Plan, Illinois. Directed field reconnaissance of an undeveloped reach of 380 kilometers of river and preparation of prefeasibility report of hydroelectric development, including preparation of screening program for evaluation of the various sites, levels of development, and power markets for the Rio Grande Project, Boliva. Performed field reconnaissance and directed the preparation of appraisal report for two pumped-storage sites in the Philippines, including preparation of computer program for study of reservoir use by existing project jointly with pumped-storage project. L. DOW NICHOL Directed the preparation of a report on remedial measures to preserve usefulness and appearance of a small scenic and recreational pond used also for storm drainage retention; directed preparation of contract documents for the Lake Ellyn renovation work, Illinois. Assisted in preparation of report on valuation of an obsolescent hydroelectric project in connection with a transfer of ownership, Lake Byllesby Dam, Minnesota. Prepared computer program for generator reliability analysis of a small, hydrothermal system, using probability method for the CEL System Expansion, El! Salvador. Participated in the economic studies and report regarding installation of a supervisory control system for Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District. Participated in conceptual planning, appraisal studies of several power projects, and review of reports for the Southern Bolivia Power Studies. Drafted revised engineering services contract and negotiated with client in Addis Ababa for the 100-MW Finchaa Project, Ethiopia. Participated in the preparation of testimony and exhibits presented in the Federal Power Commission license proceeding for the Nez Perce and High Mountain Sheep Projects, Oregon and Idaho. Layouts and estimates for use in planning studies for the Guri Project, Venezuela. 1959: Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation, New York City, New York. Office Engineer, Construction Division. 1956 to 1959: John G. Loehler and Associates, Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers, Washington, D.C., and Kensington, Maryland. 1953 to 1956: Ensign and Lieutenant, J.G., Civil Engineer Corps, U.S. Navy, Naval Gun Factory, Washington, D.C., and Naval Ammunition Depot, Crane, Indiana. 11/79 1 JACOBS ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS/CONSULTANTS John W. Nichols, Executive Vice President Education: B.S. in Civil Engineering Missouri School of Mines, 1950 Registrations: California, New York, New Jersey, Missouri Memberships: A.S.C.E., S.A.M.E., U.S.C.O.L.D., American Arbitration Association, Concrete Society, A.S.C.E. Construction Division—Committee on Contract Administration Prior to entering the practice of consulting engineering Mr. Nichols’ experience consisted of thirteen years in heavy construction with a major international contractor. During this period, a large portion of which was devoted to overseas jobs, his construction engineering and management experience included Air Base Construction, France; Pontchartrain Bridge, Louisiana; Cape Palmas Port Development, Liberia; Oil Refinery, Cuba; Road Construction, Liberia; Chesapeake Bay Crossing, Virginia-Delaware; Howard Hansen Dam, Washington; Road Construction, Kenya; Missile Launching Facilities, Plattsburg, New York; Kharq Island Military Facilities, Iran. . Since becoming a partner in Jacobs Associates in 1962, his construction engineering activities have been widely diversi- fied. Cost estimates under his direction have included Ludington Pumped Storage Power Facilities, Michigan; Naval Facilities, Iran; San Francisco Ferry Terminal, California; Mt. Elbert Power- house, Colorado; WMATA Rapid Transit Facilities, Washington; Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite Power- house Completions, Washington; Castaic Powerplant California; Oroville Dam, California; and Owenda-Belinga Railroad, Gabon. He has also supervised the scheduling for many projects including North Dock, Sausalito, California; Daly City Sewage Treatment Plant, California; San Francisco Airport Garage, California; Helm Phosphate Plant, California; and BARTD Rapid Transit Stations, California. Since 1967, the firm has engaged actively in the resolution of disputes between contractors and owners, all of which have been under his direction. Jacobs Associates’ assignments for civil engineering con- tractors on subway construction have been extensive during the past ten years. Mr. Nichols has been particularly active in these efforts. His knowledge of earthwork, concrete, bridge and marine structures, especially in remote locations, is well known in the construction industry. HAR ZA encineerinc company VIRGIL P. NORKUS Senior Mechanical Engineer Degree: Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering University of Illinois, 1971 Languages: Lithuanian and English Harza Engineering Company since 1971. Environmental/Sanitary Engineering Branch: Senior Mechanical Engineer, 1976 to date; General Mechanical Branch: Mechanical Engineer, 1975-76 and 1971-74. Experience Highlights: Senior Mechanical Engineer assigned to wastewater treatment projects for three coal-fired fossil-fueled electric generating stations. The capacities of the three treatment facilities are 1.5, 6.0 and 7.0 MGD and are intended to bring the generating stations wastewater effluents into compliance with EPA guidelines. Duties include studies, design, preparation and evaluation of equipment procurement specifications; field coordination of design activities; and determination of required modifications to existing plant systems. Participated in the feasibility study, design and cost evaluation of alternative evaporative cooling methods for the J. Mitchell station’s circulating water system for a mid-west utility. Evaluated the high pressure boiler drain and blowdown systems and design of high pressure deionized boiler water recovery systems for Will County and Kincaid generating stations, Illinois. Selected and prepared parameters for siting study of coal-fired electric generating stations within the Yellowstone River Basin. Prepared the station pump and emergency diesel procurement specifications for the Guri hydroelectric generating station, Venezuela. Also performed in-shop inspections and prepared reports on manufacturer furnished equipment for the hydroelectric generator cooling water system. Prepared plant layout, systems designs, specifications and estimates for diesel engine prime movers, engine and plant auxiliary systems, and fuel oil storage facilities for the construction of a new 24-MW electric generating station and the rehabilitation of an existing diesel electric generating station having a capacity of 27-MW for the Medan Power Rehabilitation Project, Indonesia. Prepared comparative cost estimate for diesel engine and gas turbine electric generating facilities for a feasibility study of Santa Cruz System Expansion, Bolivia. Witnessed manufacturer’s shop testing and prepared reports on diesel engine prime movers furnished for electric generation system expansion. Inspected final field installation of total Sucre project for plant start-up in Bolivia. Assisted in field evaluation and data gathering for the rehabilitation and expansion of the city of Ann Arbor water treatment plant and pumping stations, Michigan. Prepared design, specifications and estimates for the procurement and installation of standby diesel-electric generators. VIRGIL P. NORKUS Prepared layouts and detailed drawings for underground public transportation network of heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment for the Washington, D.C., Metro Subway Project. Prepared comparative cost estimates for Naperville, Illinois swimming pool water pollution abatement project. Investigated chlorine demand and dosing requirements, and estimated them with respect to residual chlorine content. Prepared data for computer study of flood water and river water surface profiles for planning studies of flood abatement and control for Ellicott Creek, New York. Prepared data, for computer analysis of water hammer in the penstocks on hydraulic turbine load acceptance and rejection for the Rio Lindo Hydroelectric project, Honduras. Feasibility study of utilization of hydraulic turbines as primer movers for driving wind tunnel fans for NASA. Performed design studies of turbines, penstocks, and steel outlet pipes. Investigated critical speed of turbines, wind tunnel fans and coupled drive system. 1974 to 1975: Stearns Rogers Corporation, Denver, Colorado. Process Mechanical Engineer. Responsible for design of condenser circulating water, boiler feed water, raw water and bearing cooling water systems for 1000-MW coal fired electric generating station, including specifications and bid evaluation for condenser cooling water pumps. 1967 to 1971: Attended the University of Illinois, Bogan Junior College, and Wilson Junior College, all in Chicago, Illinois. 1965 to 1967: Otis Elevator Company, Chicago, Illinois. Draftsman. Work included general layouts, and specifying and ordering materials in compliance with elevator codes. 1962 to 1965: U.S. Army. 5/78 LIAR ZA encincerRING ComPANy -Degree Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering ROGER G. OECHSEL Associate and Head, Soil Mechanics and Foundations | Section, Domestic Projects Northwestern University, 1960 Professional Engineer — Idaho and Illinois Structural Engineer — I|linois Professional Societies: American Society of Civil Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Harza Engineering Company since 1960. Head, Soil Mechanics and Foundations | Section, 1979 to date; Assistant Head, Domestic Projects, 1978-79; Senior Engineer, 1968-78. Foundations, Soil Mechanics and Geolagy Section: Engineer, 1960-68. Experience Highlights: Project Soils Engineer for the 2100-MW Bath County Pumped-Storage Project, Virginia, which includes two dams — one dam 500 feet high and 2,500 feet long, the other 150 feet high and 2,500 feet long. Project Manager for Beker Industries waste pond. Project entails design of waste pond reservoir from compacted gypsum for storage of fine mill tailings. Project Engineer for the Tilden Tailings Project, Michigan. Project includes an iron ore tailings retention reservoir and effluent treatment facilities. Work included feasibility study, exploration, design, and construction. Project Engineer for the Gavin Power Project, Ohio. Responsible for the design and construction of two conveyorway systems. Work involved coordination of earthwork design, bridge design, and mechanical conveyor work. One conveyor is ten miles in length, the other five miles. Total earthwork involved 3.5 million yards of excavation. Project Engineer for the design of two water supply dams for the same project. Project Engineer for the improvement of the Barton, Argo, Geddes, and Superior Dams, Huron River, for the City of Ann Arbor, Michigan, and for a feasibility study for the beautification of the Flint River, for the City of Flint, Michigan. Project Engineer for the repair of barge docking facilities, Mcintosh, Alabama, and for a feasibility study on a phosphate slurry retention reservoir, Joliet, Illinois, for Olin Corporation. Project Engineer for the renovation of Lake Ellyn, which consisted of deepening the lake, stabilizing the shoreline, and providing a new pier and retaining wall for.Glen Ellyn, Illinois, and for a feasibility study on the use of a , sanitary landfill for a food distribution center for the Metropolitan Food Center, Illinois. ROGER G. OECHSEL - Pianned and supervised field investigations and wrote reports concerning pond stability including recommendations for remedial treatment and future pond development for the Olin Corporation, Joliet, Illinois; the Coastal Chemical Corp., Pascagulia, Mississippi; and the Olin Corporation, Pasadena, Texas, waste disposal ponds. Participated in foundation and embankment design, preparation of portions of contract documents, and certain design memos for the 40-MW Rio Lindo Project, Honduras. Resident Engineer for a foundation exploration program for the 380-MW Seneca pumped-storage project, Pennsylvania. Also responsible for writing design memoranda and specifications for the foundation and embankment portion of the project, and the design for the contract’ documents and portions of the construction drawings for the upper reservoir. Field Engineer during construction of the upper reservoir. 1957 to 1960: Hazelet and Erdal, Chicago, IIlinois. Co-op student from Northwestern University. Made design studies ori the freeway system for the State of Wisconsin. Worked as soils, concrete, and pile inspector on the Illinois Tollroad. 11/80 HAR ZA encincerinc company RUSSELL A. PAIGE Geologist Degrees: Master of Science In Geology University of Washington, 1959 Bachelor of Science in Geology University of Alaska, 1955 Languages: English and Spanish Professional Geologist — California Certified Engineering Geologist — California Professional Societies: Association of Engineering Geologists Geological Society of America (Fellowship awarded in May 1972) Harza Engineering Company since 1972. Geological Division: Senior Geologist and Department Head, 1977 to date; Geologist, 1972-77. Experience Highlights: Responsible for the supervision and review of all assigned project geologic studies; planning, estimating, and supervision of exploration programs; preparation and review of reports; liaison with design and planning engineers; preparation of contract documents; and supervision and training of personnel. Project experience as Department Head includes feasibility and design studies of the Nispero Hydroelectric Project, now in construction in Honduras; prefeasibility studies of the Remolino Hydroelectric Project in Honduras; design exploration and detailed studies at the San Lorenzo Hydroelectric Project, a large earthfill dam and generating station now in construction in El Salvador, Central America; prefeasibility studies at Brumley Gap and Powell Mountain, Virginia, two pumped-storage projects equal in magnitude and complexity to the Bath County Project. Work and responsibilities on other projects have included regional and detailed site geologic mapping; planning, estimating, and supervision of exploration programs; core logging; water pressure testing; preparation of reports and contract documents; contract administration; reconnaissance evaluation of dam sites; and special studies of construction materials. Resident Geologist for the following projects: Stony Creek feasibility studies for a large pumped-storage project in Pennsylvania; Bath County Pumped-Storage Project, Virginia, now under construction as the largest pumped- storage project in the U.S.; Patia Hydroelectric Project, Colombia, South America, feasibility studies for a complex project involving a 300-meter high rockfill dam; the Foothills Project, Colorado, involving design studies for a 265-foot high concrete arch dam; the Chimbo River Hydroelectric Project, Ecuador, including prefeasibility studies for regional and detailed geologic conditions for many sites throughout the Chimbo River Basin; the Uribante-Caparo Hydroelectric Project, Venezuela, including feasibility studies of four large earthfill and rockfill dams, several tunnels, and powerstations; and the Sula Valley Flood Control Project, which involved the evaluation of numerous damsites in northern Honduras. RUSSELL A. PAIGE 1963 to 1972: Polar Division, Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, Port Hueneme, California, Specialized in engineering geology problems of snow, ice and frozen ground as related to the location of camps, roads, airfields, and other Naval facilities in the polar regions. Applied research included studies to determine seasonal changes in the strength properties and bearing capacity of sea ice for heavy cargo aircraft, docking areas, floating platforms, and other sea ice structures. _ 1962 to 1963: Haner, Ross, and Sporseen, Consulting Engineers, Portland, Oregon. Engineering Geologist. Responsible for geologic mapping of three dam sites, foundation and geologic studies for pipeline, canal, and irrigation projects. This work involved shallow-zone seismology, surveying, and supervision of core drilling programs. 1959 to 1962: Peter Kiewit Sons Company, Vancouver, Washington. Engineering Geologist. Duties consisted of classifying material on large excavation projects and helping to determine methods and costs of excavation. Shallow-zone seismology was extensively used in this work. Other duties included searches for sand, gravel, jetty stone, and rip rap. 1957 to 1959: Graduate School, University of Washington. Summer 1958: Bureau of Public Roads, Fairbanks, Alaska. Assistant Engineer. Road route geology, soils and materials classification, search and selection of construction material during road route’ location between Healy and McKinley Park and Eureka to Tanana, Alaska. Also did field work for MSc thesis. 1955 to 1957: U.S. Geological Survey, Engineering Geology Branch, College, Alaska. Geologist. Duties consisted of geologic mapping, reports, and research on frost action and permafrost. ° Technical Papers and Articles: “Floor Foundation Stabilization in Permafrost at Barrow, Alaska.’ Proceedings, Tenth Annual Symposium on Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, April 1972. “Engineering Geology in the McMurdo Sound Region, Antarctica.’’ Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Meeting, Association of Engineering Geologists, October 1966, also the Bulletin of the A.E.G., Vol. 4, No. 1, January 1967. “Two Examples of Applied Engineering Geology: Mosier, Oregon, and Petersburg, Alaska.’’ Proceedings of the 15th Alaskan Science Conference, University of Alaska, 1964. “Frost Heaving of Piles with an Example from Fairbanks, Alaska.’ U.S. Geological Survey Bull. 1111-1, 1963 (co-author). , And numerous other technical papers. 2/79 JACOBS ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS/CONSULTANTS Alfred M. Petrofsky, Vice President Education: B.S. in Civil Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1950 Registrations: California, Massachusetts, Idaho Memberships: A.S.C.E., N.S.P.E., Tau Beta Pi U.S. Committee on Large Dams After graduation from M.1.T., Mr. Petrofsky was employed by a major U.S. construction company for sixteen years. He rose from junior engineer to project engineer on major projects working in field and home offices. He has been project engineer on such projects as the San Luis Dam, California; City Tunnel Extension, Massachusetts; and Boston Main Drainage Tunnel, Massachusetts. As senior estimator he prepared complete or partial bid estimates on more than thirty multi-million dollar projects in the U.S. and overseas. Special assignments involved planning construction operations or designing special construc- tion plant for dams and underground construction. He also served as field superintendent on the Dugway Underground Explosions Test Program, Utah and the Warren Minuteman Missile Facilities, Wyoming. With Jacobs Associates since 1966, Mr. Petrofsky’s activities have included estimating, planning and designing of special equipment for such major projects as the Southeastern Sewer Tunnels, Melbourne; Ramganga Dam, India; Bandama Dam, \vory Coast; Tarbela Dam Tunnels, Pakistan; many BARTD Sub- way Projects, San Francisco; many WMATA Subway Projects, Washington; Straight Creek Tunnel, Colorado; Dorchester Tunnel, Massachusetts. He has also been active in the preparation and presentation of claims arising from contractual difficulties. From 1972 to 1975, Mr. Petrofsky was located in Melbourne, Australia, as Chief Construction Engineer of the consortium of engineering firms retained to design and manage the construction of the Melbourne Underground Rail Loop. Since then he has been the Principal in charge of joint-venture and subconsultant activities on various major projects. Much of this effort has been in relation to construction methods and cost estimates for the San Francisco Wastewater Master Plan. LIAR ZA encineerinc company JOHN P. ROBINSON Aquatic Ecologist/Fisheries Biologist Degrees: Master of Science in Zoology University of Wisconsin, 1973 Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry Michigan State University, 1969 Languages: = English and Spanish; reading knowledge of Portuguese, Italian, and technical French and German. Professional Societies: American Fisheries Society American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Harza Engineering Company since 1976. Environmental Sciences Section: Aquatic Ecologist/Fisheries Biologist, 1976 to date. Experience Highlights: Lead Scientist responsible for preparation of Exhibits R, S, V, and W of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license application for Black Bear Lake Hydroelectric Project, Southeast Alaska, including agency coordination and design and monitoring of field programs. Lead Scientist responsible for coordination of environmental studies associated with expansion of the Holtwood Hydroelectric Project, Pennsylvania. Prepared preliminary technical specifications and capacity requirements for installation of fish hatchery facilities at the Yacyreta Hydroelectric Project, Argentina and Paraguay. Analyzed aquatic resource costs and benefits of installation of hydropower at Corps of Engineers Summersville Dam, West Virginia, including aspects of instream flow and water temperature. Lead Scientist responsible for environmental review of client's Exhibit E of FERC license application for Sullivan Lake Hydroelectric Project, eastern Washington. Prepared aquatic resources sections of Exhibit E of FERC license application for Raystown Hydroelectric Project, Pennsylvania. Trained client personnel in the use of miniaturized radio telemetry equipment for monitoring fish movements in the lower Caroni River, Venezuela. Performed reconnaissance level field studies of five potential hydroelectric sites in Southeast Alaska, with major emphasis on anadromous salmonids. Evaluated potential impacts on aquatic organisms, including migratory salmonids, of development alternatives for additional generating capacity at five existing dams on the St. Joseph River, Michigan and Indiana. Prepared detailed specifications for a two-year fisheries investigation program for the Yacyreta Hydroelectric Project, Argentina and Paraguay. JOHN P. ROBINSON Monitored field studies and prepared aquatic ecology sections of Exhibits S (impacts on fish and wildlife resources) and W (environmental report) for FERC license application for the Kootenai River Hydroelectric Project, Montana. Identified potential impacts on fish and wildlife and on the esthetics and recreational use of the Missouri River for upgrading the water supply intake for the City of Williston, North Dakota. Identified potential effects of hydropower generation flows on tailwaters fisheries and water quality at existing flood control dams in the Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia. Studied aquatic plant conditions in Lake Yojoa, Honduras, to identify potential problems and their causes; recommended prevention.and contro] measures. Made recommendations for optimum design of the Lake Andes-Wagner Irrigation Project intake, Lake Francis Case (Missouri River), South Dakota, to minimize adverse effects on aquatic organisms. Performed environmental field studies and made recommendations for mitigation of potential adverse impacts of the El Nispero Hydroetectric Project, Honduras. Identified potential impacts on fisheries and wetlands resources and on public health of irrigation and flood control projects in Honduras; recommended mitigation measures and long-range environmenta! planning programs for the watersheds. Identified design parameters, available biological data, and scope of aquatic studies required for compliance of an Illinois cooling water intake with federal (Section 316b, PL 92-500) and state requirements to minimize effects on aquatic organisms. Compared impacts of alternative intake sites and water pipeline routes on stream organisms. Provided biological criteria for optimum design to minimize mortality of aquatic organisms for expansion of cooling water intake capacity at Commonwealth Edison Quad Cities and Dresden Nuclear Stations, !Ilinois. Assisted in evaluating riverine and reservoir fisheries data, and in making recommendations for further investigative and fisheries management programs for the San Lorenzo Hydroelectric Project, Rio Lempa, E! Salvador. Evaluated the human use of riverine and marine aquatic resources in the project study area based on data obtained in Cairo, Alexandria, and Rome for the Qattara Hydroelectric Project, Egypt. Evaluated the important freshwater shrimp and estuarine fisheries resources of the Lower Morass area for the Black River Upper Morass Irrigation Project, Jamaica, and made recommendations for the conservation and management of aquatic resources in the Lower Morass. 1974 to 1976: Smithsonian Institution/U.S. Peace Corps Environmental Program; Servicio de Recursos Pesqueros, Direccién General de Recursos Naturales, Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganader‘a, El Salvador, Central America. Planned and supervised fisheries and general biological surveys of major river systems. 1970 to 1973: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. Graduate Research. Responsible for all phases of coho salmon ultrasonic tracking program in Lake Michigan near Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Wisconsin; marine tracking of sockeye salmon near Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada. Technical Papers and Articles: “Study of Spawning Migration of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Lake Michigan Using Ultrasonic Transmitters,’’ Master of Science Thesis (on file at Laboratory of Limnology, University of Wisconsin). Three biological river survey reports from the Servicio de Recursos Pesqueros, Direccion General de Recursos Naturales, Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia, Soyapango, El Salvador, Central America, in Spanish. 5/81 SPENCER, DAVID L., Wildlife Biologist Position Description Environmental information development; information transfer to agencies, individuals and the general public; natural resource/environment problem research, analysis and synthesis; emphasis directed to phases concerned with Alaska's wildlife and habitat resources. Born September 2, 1915 Soc. Sec. No. 178-07-6162 Education Pennsylvania State University, B.S., Forestry 1937. University of Michigan, MF., Wildlife Conservation, 1940. University of Wisconsin - Graduate Studies, 1946. University of Montana - Graduate Studies, 1971. Experience Wildlife Biologist, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Infor- mation and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska, 1976 to present. Special Assistant, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, 1976. Wildlife Refuge Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchor- age/Kenai, Alaska, 1950-1976. (Dual Function 1950-56). Liaison Officer for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska, 1965-1970 (dual function). Refuge Manager, Kenai National Moose Range. 1948-56. Flyway Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Waterfowl Surveys-- Canada, U.S. and Mexico; Biologist, Everglades National Wildlife Refuge, Miami, Florida, 1946-1948. Project Leader for Big Game, Wyoming Game Commission, 5 months (1946, Jackson, Wyoming). Military Servicc, U.S. Navy, Naval Aviation, 1942-1945. Project Leader, Deer and Turkey, Missouri Conservation Commission, 1940- 1942. Miscellaneous short-term experience: Game bird survey expedition-- Mexico; Allegheny Forest Experiment Station--forest research field work. Des Lacs National Wildlife Refuge - summer employment. Civilian Conservation Corps, Kane, Pa. Other Qualifications Aircraft Pilot--currently qualified and licensed as a commercial sin- gle/multi-engine, land and sea pilot with instrument rating. About 7,500 flight hours, approximately 5,000 of these in natural re- source management flying. Possess a working knowledge of Alaska's field operations over all re- gions of the state in all seasons, as well as the wildlife study techniques commonly employed and transportation systems required. Professional Memberships The Wildlife Society Society of American Foresters American Society of Mammalogists Selected Publications Dalke, P.D., and D.L. Spencer. 1944. Development and land use on a private game preserve in southern Taney County, Missouri. Journal of Wildlife Management. 8(1):1-6. Dalke, P.D., and D.L. Spencer. 1946. Some ecological aspects of the Missouri wild turkey studies. In Proceedings of the North American Wildlife Conference. Dalke, P.D., A.S. Leopold, and D.L. Spencer. 1946. The life history, ecology and management of the wild turkey in Missouri. Missouri Conservation Commission. Technical Bulletin 1. Leopold, A., L.K. Souls, and D.L. Spencer. 1947. A survey of overpop- ulated deer ranges in the United States. Journal of Wildlife Man- agement. 11(2):162-176. Spencer, D.L. 1948. Aerial waterfowl breeding ground survey methods. Special Scientific Report 45 for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 94-101 pp. Spencer, D.L., U.C. Nelson, and W.A. Elkins. 1951. America's greatest goose--brant nesting area. In Proceedings of 16th North American Wildlife Conference Transactions. Spencer, D.L., and E.F. Chatelain. 1953. Progress in the management of the moose in southcentral Alaska. In the 18th North American Wild- life Conference Transactions. Kenyon, K.W., and D.L. Spencer. 1960. Sea otter population and trans- plant studies in Alaska. Special Report 48 for U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service. 29 pp. Spencer, D.L., and J.B. Hakala. 1964. Moose and fire on the Kenai. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference. Spencer, D.L. 1969. Sea otter surveys, Amchitka Island, Alaska, 1968. Battell Memorial Institute. Report BMI-171-120. AEC contract. Spencer, D.L., and C.J. Lensink. 1970. The musk-ox of Nunivak Island, Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management. 34(1):1-15. Spencer, D.L. 1977. The reservation of wildlife habitat in Alaska. Report for Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission for Alaska. 86 pp. Spencer, D.L., C.-M. Naske, and J. Carnahan. 1979. National wildlife refuges of Alaska: a historical perspective. (Aleutian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Arctic National Wildlife Range, Kenai National Moose Range). Report for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage. 183 pp. Spencer, D.L. 1979. Man and Wildlife: a display of relationships in southcentral Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska. Report for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 48 plates. Spencer, D.L., and R.J. Hensel. 1980. Bear and Mountain Goat studies. Environmental Studies of the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, Kodiak Island, Alaska. Report for Kodiak Electric Asso- ciation, Inc. 100 pp. RALPH R. STEFANO, P. E. Seattle, Washington - August 4, 1922 EDUCATION: REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: 1970 to date 1957 to 1970 1955-1957 1951-1955 1950-1951 4 University of Washington Washington State University, B.S.M.E., 1950 (MECHANICAL) State of Alaska, 1957, No. 543-E State of Washington, 1958, No. 6576 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Alaska Society of Professional Engineers American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers Past Member, Alaska State Board of Engineers and Architects Examiners Stefano & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers Anchorage, Alaska Senior Executive Engineer and President Ralph R. Stefano & Associates, Consulting Engineers, Fairbanks and Anchorage, Alaska Principal Engineer Ladd Air Force Base, Fairbanks, Alaska Base Civil Engineer's Office Mechanical Engineer for Design and Field Supervision Lytle-Green-Birch-Wyatt and Kipper Fairbanks, Alaska Mechanical Field Engineer Construction of Power Plants and Utilities Fort Greely, Big Delta Ladd Air Force Base, Fairbanks, Alaska Eielson Air Force Base, Fairbanks, Alaska Latta Brothers Refrigeration and Engineering Seattle, Washington Assistant to Chief Engineer Design and Installation of Refrigeration Plants Shore and Ship Based. Food Processing Equipment and Operation STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS Co i Ralph R. Stefano (continued) 1959-1950 1956-1949 1943-1944 1941-1943 Wyatt and Kipper Engineers, Inc. Seattle, Washington Boilermaker/Assistant Superintendent Construction of Boiler Plants Washington State University - Pullman, Washington University of Idaho - Moscow, Idaho Potlatch Forests - Lewiston, Idaho H. W. Beecher, Consulting Engineer Seattle, Washington Draftsman/Designer/Junion Engineer Steam Power Plants Anchorage, Alaska - Alaska Railroad Pullman, Washington - Washington State College Moscow, Idaho - University of Idaho W. C. NIckum & Sons, Marine Engineers/Architects Seattle, Washington Mechanical Draftsman/Designer Machinery Spaces C-4 Troopships - C-1 Freighters Siems Drake - Puget Sound Seattle, Kodiak, Dutch Harbor Mechanical Draftsman HMARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY VILLEM TAMMEKIVI Department Head Degrees: Master of Science in Hydraulics Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 1962 Bachelor of Engineering with Honors in Civil Engineering McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 1956 Certificate of Civil Engineering Institute of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia, 1944 Languages: English, Estonian, Swedish, and a working knowledge of German Professional Engineer — IIlinois Structural Engineer — Illinois Professional Societies: American Society of Civil Engineers Sigma X| Harza Engineering Company since 1957. Civil Design Branch: Department Head, 1973 to date; Section Head, 1967-73; Planning Division: Section Head, 1966-67; Group Leader, 1960-66; Engineer, 1957-60. Experience Highlights: Responsible for planning and design work on numerous hydroelectric developments. The assignments included work on the Burfell Hydroelectric Project, Iceland (ultimate installed capacity 210-MW); Reza Shah Kabir Powerhouse, Iran (installed capacity 1000-MW), intakes and water conductors; Zanja del Tigre Hydroelectric Project, Argentina (proposed installed capacity 468-MW); Rio Lindo Hydroelectric Development, Honduras (ultimate installed capacity 80-MW); Pisayambo Hydroelectric scheme in Ecuador; Yarmouk River Hydroelectric, Irrigation, and Water Supply Project Jordan; Snake and Salmon River Hydroelectric Developments, Idaho (total proposed installed capacity 2000-MW); Caroni River Hydroelectric Projects, Venezuela (total proposed installed capacity 10,000-MW). Project management experience includes storage reservoir and tunnel studies for the Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Plan, Illinois; prefeasibility studies of the Uribante-Caparo Hydroelectric Project, Venezuela (proposed installed capacity 800-MW); rehabilitation studies of Lock and Dam No. 1 on the Mississippi River in Minnesota; expansion of Guri initial powerhouse expansion (incremental installed capacity 2000-MW). Also served on numerous field assignments as planning, hydraulic and structural engineer. VILLEM TAMMEKIVI 1956 to 1957: Shawinigan Water and Power Company, Montreal, Canada. Assistant Hydraulic Engineer. Duties included general planning of hydro power in Northern Quebec; evaluation of evaporation losses from Gouin Reservoir; preparation of reservoir operation and power studies, including forecasting of spring run-off in St. Maurice River watershed. 1945 to 1954: Indalsalvens Regleringsforening, Stockholm, Sweden. Hydroelectric Planning Engineer. Responsible for hydrological, hydraulic, reservoir operation, power and energy, and economical studies for planning, design and operation of more than 25 storage and pondage reservoirs in Indalsalven, Faxalven and Ljusnan watersheds. 1945: Svenska Trahus, Stockholm, Sweden. Draftsman. Prepared assembly drawings and cost estimates for prefabricated houses. 1943 to 1944: Revaler Werft, Tallinn, Estonia. Assistant Resident Engineer. Responsible for construction and maintenance of harbor structures. Technical Papers and Articles: Unpublished Thesis: ‘‘Evaluation of Methods of Flood Routing in Open Channels.”” 3/77 Date of Birth: Citizenship: Education: Languages: December 1977 to Date: October 1973 to December 1977: HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY G. M. TALGAR Senior Transmission Engineer November 5, 1942 U. S. A. Robert College 1962-1966, Istanbul, Turkey B. S. in Civil Engineering Worcester Polytechnic Institute 1967-1968, Worcester, Massachusetts M. S. in Civil Engineering (Major, Structures and Foundations) English, Turkish and working knowledge of French Harza Engineering Company International, Pakistan. Transmission Engineer. Assigned to the 500 kV Lyallpur-Multan Guddu project, Pakistan. Planning, design, and construction supervision for a 330 mile single circuit 500 kV line, including installation of 4 ft. and 5 ft. diameter cast-in-place piles for reinforced concrete river crossing foundations. Design of foundation types on the transmission line. Review of steel transmission tower and 220 kV switchyard structure designs and manufacturer's drawings. Preparation of plans, designs and specifications for use in project tender documents, tender evaluations, construction contract surveillance, administration and inspection. Conduct inspection of construction materials. Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, Illinois. Transmission Engineer. Transmission and Substation Division. Employed as Transmission Engineer in Transmission and Substation Division. Has been responsible for the design and engineering of transmission lines up to 500 kV. Designed, checked, and formulated design criteria for all kinds of transmission towers and substation structures. Responsibilities included studies for design and loading conditions, writing specifications, analyzing suppliers; proposals and making recommendations. Also responsible for the design application and construction coordination of most of the foundation work in the division. G. M. TALGAR Senior Transmission Engineer March 1972 to October 1973: July 1969 to March 1972: June 1968 to July 1969: July 1966 to May 1967: Turkish Navy Headquarters, Istanbul, Turkey. Employed as Navy Civil Engineer in charge of Navy Building Constructions on land in Istanbul; supervised the construction of various large reinforced concrete hospitals. Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, Illinois. Employed as a Structural Designer in Transmission Substation Departments. Designed caissons, grillages, spread footings and piles for tower foundations. Fomulated design criteria and calculated design loads for transmission towers. Designed single circuit, double circuit and take off steel towers. Also worked on design and layout of La Salle Nuclear Power Plant reinforced concrete substructure. Supervised preparation of design drawings and maintained contact with all engineering groups. Procon, Chicago, Illinois. Employed as a Structural Designer in Design and Planning Division. Designed all kinds of Reinforced Concrete Foundations including hexagonal and combined foundations supporting heater, exchanger and reactors. Also designed multistory steel frames, pipe supports and pipe racks common in refinery construction. Turkish State Sugar Factories, Balikesir, Turkey. Employed as a Field Engineer supervising the foundation construction and subsequent steel skeleton erection of a sugar factory. THIELE, JAMES G., Fisheries Biologist, Research Analyst Position Description Conduct marine and freshwater fishery research in response to univer- sity, agency, industry, or other contractual requests. Maintain com- prehensive knowledge and current awareness of arctic and subarctic research in marine and freshwater fishery sciences, aquaculture, ocean- ography, and other related disciplines. Compile and synthesize available knowledge into environmental reports or special papers dealing with Alaskan aquatic resource issues. Respond to agency and individual inquiries for information. Born January 23, 1950 Soc. Sec. No. 524-64-0268 Education University of Colorado, B.S. Biology, 1972. Professional Memberships The American Fisheries Society The National Audubon Society Associated Photographers International Experience Fisheries Biologist, Research Analyst, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska from March, 1980 to present. Three years experience with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game as Fisheries/Habitat Biologist which included: Fisheries Biologist, Anchorage, Alaska, January to May, 1976; May, 1977 to October, 1979. Fisheries Biologist, Palmer, Alaska, May, 1978 to January, 1979. Habitat Biologist, JFWAT Pipeline Surveillance, Anchorage, Alaska, May, 1976 to August, 1976. Fisheries Biologist, Seward, Alaska, August to November, 1975. Media Specialist, Biological Sciences. Curriculum Study, Boulder, Colorado, September, 1973 to October, 1974. Research Assistant, University ofColorado, Boulder, Colorado, September, 1971 to May, 1972. Three years as a self-employed Freelance Photographer in varied locations, 1969 to 1972. Significant Projects An investigation conducted by the University of Colorado into the potential environmental effects and human health consequences of elevated molyb- denum levels (due to mining activity) in the main water supply of Denver, Colorado. Mini-course. Development project for Purdue University of college level, audio/tutorial mini-courses dealing with biological science topics. Served as staff photographer and media coordinator for the contractor, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. Assessment for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) of the sport fishery and coho salmon stocking program in the Seward/Resurrection Bay region of Alaska. Identification and habitat analysis of all fish streams impacted by the construction of the Trans Alaska Pipeline for the Joint Fish and Wildlife Advisory Team. Collection of regional data for ADF&G for inclusion.in the "Fisheries . Atlas". Limnological investigation of Matanuska Valley lakes and streams for ADF&G to determine their suitability for inclusion in an enhancement or rehabilitation program. Assessment for ADF&G of the sport fishery for coho and king salmon on the west side Susitna River systems. Selected Publications Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. 1974. Minicourses in Biological Science - A Study Guide. Student and teacher manuals for use in an audio tutorial program. State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game. 1978. Alaska Fisheries Atlas. — Wilson, W.J. et al. 1980. An assessment of environmental effects of _construction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak Island, Alaska; instream flow studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Interim report for Kodiak Electric Association. 197 pp. . 1981. An assessment of environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak, Alaska; instream flow studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Final report for Kodiak Electric Association. 419 pp. MAR ZA. encineerinc comrany JAMES H. THRALL Head, Environmental Sciences Section Degrees: Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Science Illinois State University, 1972 Master of Science in Biological Science St. Mary's College, 1967 Bachelor of Science in Biology St. Mary’s College, 1964 Languages: English, Spanish, and French (reading knowledge) Professional Societies: American Society of Icthyologists and Herpetologists International Society for Tropical Ecology North American Benthological Society Harza Engineering Company since 1974. ‘ Environmental Sciences Section: Head, 1979 to date; Aquatic Ecologist, 1974-79. Experience Highlights: Supervises aquatic and terrestrial resource assessments and ecological impact analyses for both domestic and overseas projects, Designs and supervises basic fisheries investigations, including biological and socioeconomic field studies. Project Engineer and Lead Ecologist for both environmental and engineering/agricultural projects. Provides expert witness testimony to governmental and international agencies. Project Engineer and Lead Ecologist for the international Puyango-Tumbes Irrigation Development Project (up to 140,000 hectares of irrigation development in Peru and Ecuador). Coordinated work of engineers, agronomists, economists, and biologists, and supervised the preparation of a final report in Spanish. Environmental coordinator responsible for the preparation of an environmental assessment report for the 80,000-acre Lake Andes Irrigation Project in eastern South Dakota. Work included assessment of project impacts on terrestrial, wetland, and aquatic habitats; development of recommendations for protecting and enhancing wildlife, fisheries and recreation resources; as well as recommendations concerning necessary steps for compliance with local, state, and federal regulatory guidelines. Project Engineer and Lead Ecologist for the review study of the International Joint Commission’s report on the Garrison Diversion Unit irrigation project in North Dakota. Prepared a review report and presented expert witness testimony before the International Joint Commission. Supervised the preparation of a report on the riverine ecosystems to be affected by the Garrison Diversion Unit, as part of a study done for the Bureau of Reclamation. Designed and supervised a year-long basic fisheries investigation in the Rio Lempa, El Salvador, as part of the feasibility studies of the San Lorenzo Hydroelectric Project. Work included biological, water quality, and socioeconomic field studies. JAMES H. THRALL Performed fisheries assessments for hydroelectric development projects in Venezuela, Guyana, and Colombia. 1 1972 to 1974: mm Peace Corps — Smithsonian Institute Environmental Program. Worked with the Instituto de Desarrollo de Los Recursos Naturales Renovables (INDERENA) in Colombia, South cS America. Engaged in studies of the sabaleta, Brycon henni, a freshwater fish, including its life history, basic ecological : investigations, as well as studies related to the development of this species for fish culture. Limnological studies on a newly formed reservoir of El Peflal and the Porce River, Colombia. Advisor to the staff of INDERENA (a conservation; agency of the Colombian government) in the planning of fish culture stations and future fisheries research projects. i} Taught an intensive, one-week course in aquatic ecology, attended by ail INDERENA fisheries biologists. 1967 to 1972: Illinois State University, Bloomington, Illinois. National Science Foundation Research Fellow and Teaching Assistant in the Department of Biological Sciences. i Doctoral dissertation research on the aquatic ecology of larval amphibians. 1966 to 1967: . \ St. Mary's College, Winona, Minnesota. Master’s candidate and teaching assistant. Master’s thesis research on feeding and digestive physiology of freshwater mussels, \ 1964 to 1966: Institute of Medical Technology, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Instructor in anatomy and physiology. ; Technical Papers and Articles: “Alimento y Alimentacion de la Sabaleta (Characidae: 8rycon henni) en el Rio Porce con Observaciones Sobre Alimentacion in Cautividad” Instituto de Desarroilo de Los Recursos Naturales Renovables. Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, 1973. “Peces de la Alta y Media Cuacha, Algunos Posibilidades Para Piscultura."” Instituto de Desarrollo de Los Recursos Naturales Renovables, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, 1973. “Excavation of Pits by Juvenile Rana catesbeiana,”” Copeia, 1971, pp. 751-752. “An Albino DeKay’s Snake (Storeria dekayi wrightorum Trapido) from Central Illinois.’ Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, 1972, Vol. 64, No. 4, P. 400. 11/73 HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY BRUNO TROUILLE Planning Engineer Degrees: Master of Science in Industrial Relations 1978, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois Ingenieur ICAM (Civil and Mechanical Engineer) 1975, Institut Catholique des Arts et Metiers Lille, France Languages: English, French; knowledge of German and Indonesian Harza Engineering Company since 1978. Energy Resources Planning Section: Planning Engineer, 1978 to date. Experience Highlights: Responsibilities include economic studies, reservoir operation studies, and power and energy forecasts for hydro- electric and water resources developments. Duties also include basic hydraulic computations. Led the work effort to produce a report for the Institute of Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concerning the magnitude and regional distribution of the needs for hydropower in the United States. Duties included an analysis of the 1978 electric demand and supply situation in 26 separate regions representing the nation and development of power and energy forecasts for the same regions through the year 2000. Participated in the power operations, quantity and cost estimates, and economic analysis of the Summersville Lake Modification Study (West Virginia) for the Huntington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Participated in and wrote a computer program for the econognic analysis of hydroelectric prefeasibility studies of Gartina Creek, Black Bear Lake, Cathedral Falls, and Thayer Creek projects for the Alaska Power Authority. Participated in technical studies and layouts of dams, intake-outlet structures, water conductors, and underground powerstations for the following pumped-storage projects: Brumley Gap Project, Virginia (3,000 MW), Cipo Hills and Primavera Project, Brazil (1,000 MW, and 2,000 to 4,000 MW). 1976 — 1977: Schlumberger Technical Services, Singapore. Senior Field Engineer, Indonesia. Provided services to oil companies in the fields of exploration and production of gas, oil, and water. Conducted a wide variety of measurements, tests, and controls at well-sites. In charge of a Schlumberger unit, as such supervised a team of technicians and operators and worked closely with rig superintendents and geologists. Familiar with offshore, onshore and helicopter dependent drilling operations. 1975: Centre d’Essais des Structures, Saint Remy-les-Chevreuse, France. Research Engineer. Conducted a research study in the elasticity of prestressed concrete. Participated in several other research studies. BRUNO TROUILLE Societe d‘Ingenierie du Tunnel sous la Mer, France. Resident Engineer, Calais, France. Supervised cement injection and tests for water tightness during the preliminary phases of the English Channel Tunnel Project. Also participated in cost/performance analysis of alternative construction materials and scheduling of construction operations. 5/80° TRUDGEN, DAVID E., Wildlife Biologist, Research Analyst Position Description Work under department heads and scientific principal investigators. Gather necessary research and analytical information. Perform routine aggregations of information and prepare narrative drafts. Prepare draft graphics and maps illustrating information presentations. Born March 9, 1954 Soc. Sec. No. 378-62-6284 Education Michigan State University, B.S., Wildlife Biology & Management, 1976. Internship Michigan Youth Conservation Corps, June 1 - September 1, 1975. Duties: Supervised 6-10 high school youth on work projects and taught environmental concepts. Professional Memberships The Wildlife Society National Audubon Society National Wildlife Federation Experience Research Analyst, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska. July 1978 to present. Project Support Assistant, University of Alaska, Artic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska, 1977 to June 1978. Fisheries Biologist I, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Anchorage, Alaska, June - September 1977. Sales Manager/person, Big & Tall of Anchorage, Alaska, November 1976 to May 1977. Game Technician III, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Game Division, Anchorage, August 1976 to October 1976. Significant Projects Navigable Waters Project, conducted for the Bureau of Land Management to study the present-day and historical uses of Alaska's inland waterways. NANA Region Project conducted for the Mauneluk Association involving two a stages: 1) compilation of bibliography on natural/cultural .- resources pertaining to the Nana Region; 2) preparing a set of maps, graphically illustrating those natural and cultural resources with ‘associated. text relating the status of knowledge and data gaps of Lo . the resources. Terror Lake Project. Conducted for the Kodiak Electric Association, Inc., to study the effect of construction and operation of a proposed hydroelectric dam project on the fish and wildlife resources within and adjacent to the project area. a Selected Publications Alaska, University, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. a 1978. An Assessment of Environmental Effects on Construction, Operation, and Abandonment of a Man-made Gravel Island; Niakuk Well No. 3 in Stefansson Sound, Alaska. Report for SOHIO Petroleum Company. 78. pp. Hensel, R.J., D.L. Spencer, D.E. Trudgen. 1981. An evaluation of brown ‘ bear denning in the area of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric we project, Kodiak Island. Unpublished. Arctic Environmental Information and, Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Paper pre- sented at the carnivore furbearer research and management workshop, Lo. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK. ' Wilson, W.J. et al. 1979. An assessment of environmental effects of con- | struction of the Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak Island, Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Report for Kodiak Electric Association. 334 pp. - 1980. An assessment of environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak Le Island, Alaska; instream flow studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Interim report for Kodiak Electric Association. 197 pp. - 1980. An assessment of environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak, Alaska; raptor studies, intragravel water temperature:studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Report for Kodiak Electric Association. 57 pp. _ - 1981. An assessment of environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facility, Kodiak, Alaska; instream flow studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK. Final report for Kodiak Electric Association. 419 pp. Oo Title Expertise Experience with Firm Curriculum Vitae WILLIAM W. WADE Senior Economist/Project Manager Economics and Finance Principal Investigator/Project Manager Regional socioeconomic investigations for two environmental impact reports: a nickel mine, and a lignite mine and power plant. Land use study for site selection of a 3000-MW power plant in Utah. Review of socioeconomic impacts of California OCS Lease Sale 53. Optimization of coal supply and transportation alternatives for two separate public utilities. Demand estimation and forecast to 1990 of phosphate and potash fertilizer. Assessment of the feasibility of using coal resources of north- western Alaska for space heating and electricity. Multi-objective decision analyses for Central Arizona Water Control Study. Economic and Financial Analysis of Tourism Development Plan for The Bahamas: 1980-1990. Financial and engineering economics for proposed coal slurry pipeline. Financial and engineering economics for San Francisco Bay dredge spoil removal. Financial and engineering economics of development of Alaska OCS oil and gas. Economic and Geologic Determinants of Regional Trends of U.S. onshore oil and gas drilling. Economic impact on Eastern U.S. energy balance of Gulf of Mexico gas development. Economic impact on U.S. energy balance of potential OCS Alaska oil and gas production. Economic Assessment of Chernofski Harbor Development in The Aleutians. Economic impact on U.S. energy balance of Prudhoe Bay secondary recovery production. Geothermal monitoring for power supply development in Northern California. Economic comparison of alternate sites for Valdez Marine Con- tainer Terminal. Dames & Moore -2- Experience With Firm (contd. ) Past Experience Academic Background Professional Affiliations Recent Publications e Economic analysis. of competitive position and growth potential for Valdez Marine Terminal. e Homer Spit study of alternate coastal development plans. e Municipality of Anchorage capacity analysis of the Anchorage salmon industry. Economist and Financial Analyst, Standard Oil of California e Finance: Conducted project investment pay-out analyses, industry financial and profitability studies, studies reviewing effect of inflation on investment analysis and effect of in- creased working capital on project risk and hurdle rates. e Supply and logistics: Followed spot market values of petroleum products and conducted recurrent refinery optimization and product supply analyses; conducted larger petroleum product supply analyses and transportation economic analyses. e Economics: Conducted studies for corporate planning such as prospects for growth among subsectors of U.S. economy, demand for nonferrous metals, and agribusiness organization and growth prospects; developed econometric planning models; analyzed tax effects on capital expansion. Instructor, Price Theory and Microeconomics, San Francisco State University and San Francisco University (Night classes, 1973-1976) B.S. in English/Journalism, Spring Hill College M.S. in Agricultural Economics, University of Minnesota Ph.D in Resource and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota American Economic Association; American Agricultural Economic Association; National Association of Business Economists (Past President, San Francisco Chapter). "New Study Analyzes Alaska OCS Areas," Oil and Gas Journal, Jan 12, 1981. "Economics Analyzed for Six of 10 Alaska OCS Lease Sale Areas," Oil and Gas Journal, Jan 19, 1981. "Alaska OCS--Game of Giant Fields," Offshore, April 1981. "Conflicts May Impede Alaska Sales." Offshore, April, 1981. "Impact of Potential Supplies from Alaska's OCS on America's Energy Balance," Engineering Bulletin, 1980. "Gulf of Alaska Development Hinges on Giant Reserves," Oil and Gas Journal, Sept. 17, 1979. Institutional Determinants of Technical Change and Agricultural Productivity Growth, New York: Arno Press, 1981. "Factor Productivity and Growth: A ‘Historical Interpretation," Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions & Development, Hans P. Binswanger, Vernon W. Ruttan, Editors, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1978. HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY LEEI-LUOH WANG Power Planning Engineer Degrees: Master of Science in Civil Engineering Utah State University, 1966 Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Engineering, Hydraulic Section National Taiwan University, China, 1958 Languages: English and Chinese Professional Engineer — |/|inois Harza Engineering Company since 1966. Power Planning Engineer, Hydroelectric Planning Section, 1971 to date; Planning Engineer, Water Resources Section, 1966-71. Experience Highlights: Supervises the planning studies of assigned hydroelectric and other projects. Specializes in adapting system analysis techniques to the solution of complex planning problems. As Project Engineer and Lead Engineer, prepares budgets, work schedules, and reports; coordinates work assignments; monitors cost and progress; and maintains liaison with client. Project Engineer for the Lower Caroni Master Plan Study, Venezuela, including five potential projects with a combined hydroelectric capacity of 8,000 MW; for a prefeasibility study of the 800-MW Cuffs Run Pumped-Storage Project, Pennsylvania; for an augmentation reservoir siting study, Pennsylvania and Maryland; for feasibility studies of expansion of the Lower Susquehanna power plant, Pennsylvania, including the 230-MW Safe Harbor Project and the 108-MW Holtwood Project; for a load dispatch study of the Virginia Electric and Power Company’s system, Virginia; and for the technical feasibility study of the 1,800-MW Sogamoso Project, Colombia. Project Engineer for storm drainage studies, Village of Kenilworth, Illinois; probable maximum flood studies at Monticello Nuclear Power Station, Minnesota; radioactive pollutant dispersion study for Zimmer Station, Ohio; and the Columbus Flood Plan Study, Indiana. Power System Specialist to National Power Company, Iceland. Supervised power system study for the Thjorsa Basin that included two existing power plants, five potential reservoirs, ten proposed hydroelectric plants, a pumping station, and various diversion schemes. Participated in studies of the Puyango-Tumbes Basin Development, Ecuador-Peru; the Parana River development, Corpus Project, Argentina; the 10,000-MW Guri Hydroelectric Project, Venezuela; and the 1,500-MW Patia Hydroelectric Project, Colombia. 1966: Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Graduate Research Assistant on a project to develop a plan for the water needs of the State of Utah. LEEI-LUOH WANG 1964 to 1965: ' International Engineering Company, San Francisco, California. Assistant Engineer. Worked on a series of feasibility studies for hydroelectric and irrigation projects in Tunisia and Turkey. 1962 to 1964: Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Graduate Student. Worked for Utah State Department of Highways as Soils Engineer during the summer, conducting soil analyses and site investigations for interstate highway projects. 1959 to 1962: Taiwan Provincial Water Conservancy Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan. Junior Irrigation Engineer, Planning Division. 1958 to 1959: , Chinese Air Force. LC Engineer Officer. Technical Papers and Articles: 7 “Application of Multivariate Analysis in Predicting the Water Yields in Utah,’’ unpublished thesis. mf “Estimating Water Yields in Utah by Principal Component Analysis,’’ with A. L. Huber, Utah Water Research Laboratory Report PRWG 35 a-1, June 1967. 1/80 WILSON, WILLIAM J., Supervisor, Resource Science and Cultural Services Division; Senior Research Analyst in Fisheries Expertise My major current interest is in measuring fishery and aquatic habitat response to hydroelectric developments, placer mining, coal extraction, and logging including hydraulic and aquatic habitat modeling and in- stream flow assessment. I have experience in leadership and supervision of multidisciplinary scientific staff in environmental assessment, problem identification and scoping, budgeting and personnel management, proposal and grant writing, and contract compliance, Major education and postgraduate efforts have been in marine and estuarine fishery science with focus on marine pollution problems affecting coastal shell- fish resources. My eight years of Alaska expertise have been concen-— trated in marine and freshwater fishery biology, aquatic habitats and impact assessment, oceanography, limnology, and instream flow assess- ment. Experienced in field sampling of aquatic habitats and organisms, and in laboratory analysis of water, substrate, and organisms samples; experienced in bioassay of toxis substances and laboratory rearing of test organisms, certified SCUBA diver; experienced photographer. Education ‘ Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, B.S., Biology, 1969. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, M.S., Fisheries and Wild- life, 1973. Professional Experience Supervisor, Resource Science and Cultural Services Division, and Senior Research Analyst in Fisheries, University of Alaska, Arctic Environ mental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska, July 1, 1980 to present. Senior Research Analyst in Fisheries, University of Alaska, Arctic En- vironmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska, July 1, 1978 to July 1, 1980. Collaborator, U.S. National Park Service, Alaska Area Office, Anchorage, Alaska, April, 1979. Research Analyst in Fisheries and Wildlife Biology, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anch- orage, Alaska, August 1, 1975 to July 1, 1978. Research Assistant in Biology, University of Alaska, Arctic Environ- mental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska, August 1, 1974 to July 31, 1975. : oO Independent Consultant, Water.Quality Biologist, Puget Sound Oil Base- line Studies, Daniel, Mann, Johnson, Mendenhall/Hilton, Portland, Oregon, May 1 to July 1, 1974. General Science Instructor, Lincoln County School District, Newport, Oregon, February to June, 1974. Aquatic Biologist and Research Assistant, Pesticide Toxicity to Dunge- ness Crab and Thermal Tolerance of Estuarine Organisms Studies, Oregon State University, Marine Science Center, Newport, Oregon, 1973-1974. Environmental Protection Agency Trainee in Water Quality, Suspended Sediments Study, Oregon State University, Marine Science Center, Newport, Oregon, 1970-1973. Fisheries Laboratory Assistant, Freshwater Stream Productivity Studies, Oregon State University, Oak Creek Fisheries Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, 1970. Professional Memberships American Fisheries Society 1975-present Certified Fisheries Scientist (1976) Alaska Chapter 1975-present Fish Culture Section 1977-present American Institute of Fishery Research Biologists 1978 to present. Anchorage Fish and Game Advisory Committee 1980-82. Significant Projects Co-Author. University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1974-1976. Alaska Regional Profiles. Report for Alaska Office of the Governor, Juneau. 6 vols. Co-Author. Anadromous Fish Inventory. Summary of commercial, sport, and subsistence fishery information, habitat and spawning areas, and harvest data for proposed National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska. Re- port and maps for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage. 1975. Co-Author. Evaluation and synthesis of chemical, physical, and biolo- gical oceanographic features of Chukchi Sea. LaBelle, J.C. et al. 1975. Chuckchi Sea. Bering Strait to Icy Cape; Physical and Bio- logical Character of the Alaskan Coastal Zone and Marine Environ- ment. AEIDC Publication A-75. 54 pp. 31 maps (1:1,000,000). Participant. Environmental assessment of a proposed natural gas pipe- line, Prudhoe Bay to the U.S.-Canada Border. Report for Gulf Inter- state Engineering Company. 1976. Participant. Environmental evaluation of a proposed Outer Continental Shelf oil support facility, Cape Chiniak, Kodiak Island, Alaska. Prepared for Koniag, Inc. 1976. Co-Author. Community Planning and Engineering Map Folios for Eleven Northwest Alaska villages. Prepared for Alaska Department of Com- munity and Regional Affairs. 1976. Project Leader. Evaluation of physical and biological constraints on siting of proposed marine ports to serve mineral and fishery in- dustries in the Outer Continental Shelf region of western Alaska. 1977. Participant. Fishery resource evaluation, statewide Alaska, of lands within National Wildlife Refuges selected pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (section 22-e). 1977. Co-Chairman. Fisheries Information Needs Workshop. Working group to assess needs and to address solutions for management of Alaskan fishery data. 27th Alaska Science Conference and Report to Special Advisor (fisheries) to the Governor of Alaska. 1977. Project Leader. Collect, synthesize, and computerize detailed historical and physical data about inland water bodies of Alaska. Information relates to historic use of waters for travel, trade, and commerce (navigability issues). Study for U.S. Bureau of Land Management. 1977-79. Co-Author. Assemble available information, synthesize knowledge, and prepare a comprehensive report on bowhead, black right, and gray whale habitat in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. Report for Naval Arctic Research Laboratory, Barrow, Alaska. 1979. Participant. Evaluation of information on vessel superstructure icing po- tential in Alaskan marine waters. Report for Pacific Marine Environ- mental Laboratory, Seattle, Washington. 1980. Project Leader. Evaluation of two proposed hydroelectric facilities and their effects on fish and wildlife resources: Terror Lake, Kodiak, and Tyee Lake, Petersburg/Wrangell. 1979-1981. Member. Susitna Hydroelectric Project Steering Committee. Interagency group to coordinate and review information relating to studies of the Susitna Hydro Project. Alaska Power Authority. 1980-81. Co-Project Leader. General review of environmental considerations of the proposed Beluga coal mining and methanol extraction facilities. Re- port for DOWL Engineers, Anchorage, and Cook Inlet Region, Inc./Placer Amex, Inc. 1980. Thesis Research Wilson, W.J. 1974. Effects of concentration and particle size of sus- pended materials on growth and condition of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas). Oregon State University, Corvallis, M.S. thesis. 65 pp. Selected Publications Buck, E.H., W.J. Wilson, et al. 1975. Kadyak--A Background for Living. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Sea Grant Report 75-9. 324 pp. Wilson, W.J., and E.H. Buck. 1977. The Comprehensive Resource Inventory as a Management Tool - A Case Study Inventorying the Anadromous Fish Resources of Nine Proposed National Wildlife Refuges. Paper presented at 27th Alaska Science Conference. August 4-7, 1976. Fairbanks, Alaska (Abstract). 2 pp. Wilson, W.J. 1977. Red tides. Part 1. Alaska. 43(5):23,60. . 1977. Red tides and paralytic shellfish poisoning. Conclusion. Alaska. 43(6) :32-33. Wilson, W.J. 1977. Winter Water Availability and Use Conflicts as Related to Fish and Wildlife in Arctic Alaska. Paper presented at 3d Annual Meeting, Alaska Chapter, American Fisheries Society. February 22-24, 1977. Cordova, AK. 12 pp.. Wilson, et al. 1977. Winter Water Availability and Use Conflicts as Related to Fish and Wildlife in Arctic Alaska-~A Synthesis of Information. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-77/06. 222 pp. Wilson, W.J., and E.H. Buck. 1977. Anchorage Sport Fishing Guide. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. AEIDC Publication A77. Map/brochure. Buck, E.H., et al. 1978, Bibliography, Synthesis, and Modeling of Nak- nek River Aquatic System Information. Arctic Environmental Infor- mation and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for U.S. National Park Service, Anchorage. 244 pp. Evans, C.D., W.J. Wilson, et al. 1978. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction Operation, and Abandonment of a Man-made Gravel Island. Niakuk Well No. 3 in Stefansson Sound, Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Sohio Petroleum Company, Anchorage. Wilson, W.J., and E.H. Buck. 1978. Status Report on Salmonid Culture in Alaska. Fisheries. 3(5):1019. Wilson, W.J. 1979. Evaluation of information and ecological modeling of the Naknek River aquatic system, Katmai National Monument, Alaska. 6th Annual Science and Resource Management Conference, Pacific Northwest ‘Region, National Park Service. April 1719, 1979, Corvallis, OR. 25 pp. Wilson, W.J. et al. 1979. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction and Operation of the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Kodiak, Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 334 pp. Evans, C.D., W.J. Wilson et al. 1980. Environmental Review of Summer Construction of Gravel Islands: Sag Delta No. 7 and No. 8 in Stefansson Sound, Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Sohio Petroleum Company, Anchorage. 83 pp. Wilson, W.J. 1980. Instream Flow and Fishery Research Associated with the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, Kodiak Island. Paper presented at 7th Annual Meeting, Alaska Chapter, American Fisheries Society. November 18-21, 1980, Girdwood, Alaska. Wilson, W.J. et al. 1980. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Construction and Operation of the Proposed -Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Kodiak, Alaska. Raptor Studies. Intragravel Water Tempera- ture Studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Kodiak Electric Associ-~ ation, Inc. 57 pp. Wilson, W.J. et al. 1980. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Con- struction and Operation of the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Kodiak, Alaska. Instream Flow Studies. Arctic Environ- mental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 197 pp. Wilson, W.J. et al. 1981. An Assessment of Environmental Effects of Con- struction and Operation of the Proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Kodiak, Alaska. Instream Flow Studies. Final Report. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 419 pp. Wilson, W.J. 1982. Instream flow decision-making. for a proposed Alaskan hydroelectric project. Proceedings of the Symposium by the Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information. October 28-30, 1981, Portland, Oregon. In Press. o WISE, James L., Climatologist Expertise Federal/State Climatologist for Alaska. Maintains up-to-date records on the climate of Alaska including copies of weather observation logs, summarizes data publications from the National Climatic Center, and unpublished climate data from.the state. Provide climate information in response to requests from individuals, government agencies, and industry. Apply relevant climate information to the solution of practical problems of design, planning, impact assessment, alternate energy use, and related subjects. Education Kent State University, B.S., Education, 1953. St. Louis University, Meteorology, 1953-1954.° Florida State University, M.S., Meteorology, 1968. Experience Associate in Climatology/Meteorology, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska. 1976 to present. Research Analyst in Climatology/Meteorology, University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Anchorage, Alaska. 1975 to 1976. Weather Officer, U.S. Air Force, 1953 to 1975. Assignments included: Aerospace Science Officer, llth Weather Squadron (Climatologist and Technical Services). Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska. 1972 to 1975. . . Chief, NH MACRO Section at Air Force Global Weather Center, Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska. 1969 to 1972. Commander/Supervisor of Forecasting and Observing Units., conus and overseas. 1957 to 1969. Chief Forecaster and Duty Forecaster, several locations. 1954 to 1965. Professional Memberships Alasa Solar Advisory Group American Association for Advancement of Science American Association of State Climatologists American Meteorological Society Anchorage Board of Realtors ‘Alaska State Board of Realtors National Association of Realtors Selected Publications Wise, J.L., A.L. Comiskey, R. Becker. 1981. Storm surge climatology and forecasting in Alaska. Report for Alaska Council on Science and Technology. 1 vol. Wise, J.L., et al. 1980. Wind energy resource atlas: the Alaska region. Report for U.S. Dept. of Energy. 1 vol. Wise, J.L. 1980. Analysis of solar radiation measurements on an inclined surface in Anchorage, Alaska. Report for U.S. Department of Energy. 20 pp. Wise, J.L., and A.L. Comiskey. 1980. Superstructure icing study. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska, Anchorage. Report for Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory/NOAA. 20 pp. Wise, J.L. 1979. Alaska solar radiation analysis. Report for U.S. Dept. of Energy. 27 pp. Alaska, University, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1978. Aleutian Pribilof Islands region community profiles. 9 folios. - 1978. North Slope region community profiles. 8 folios. Brower, W.A., Jr., H.W. Searbey, and J.L. Wise. 1977. Climatic atlas of the outer continental shelf waters and coastal regions of Alaska. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Univer- sity of Alaska, Anchorage, and U.S. National Climatic Center, Asheville, N.C. 3 vols. Wise, J.L. 1977. January maximum and mimimum temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit: July maximum and minimum temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit: mean annual precipitation in inches: mean annual snowfall in inches. 6 maps (1:2,500,000). Alaska, University, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1977. Copper River region community folios: A background for planning. 9 folios. Alaska, University, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center. 1977. Northwest Alaska community profiles: A background for planning. 11 folios. - 1974-1976. Alaska regional profiles. Report for Alaska Office of the Governor, Juneau. 6 vols. Wise, J.L. 1973. Operational cold fog dissipation in Alaska. In Proceedings of the 24th Alaskan Science Conference. 323-326 pp. -- WORK PLAN The Work Plan has been developed to meet the scope of services presented in the Alaska Power Authority RFP. 1. Determine the optimal plan for developing the projects using a multiobjective approach. These objectives should include: a. minimizing market area energy costs, b. minimizing adverse environmental and social impacts while enhancing environmental values to the extent possible, c. maximizing the likelihood of project financing and implementation. Determine with reasonable certainty the cost of the project and cash flow requirements. Determine the nature and extent of environmental and social impacts of the project, along with those mitigating measures that could be taken to offset adverse impact. Complete all other data collection and analysis required to develop conceptual designs, determine plan costs and identify any major environmental obstacles. Fully coordinate project studies with all interested federal, state and local entities and with the general public. Two sets of meetings in four surrounding communities, including Bethel, should be anticipated. Prepare any required land use permit applications and supporting documents for the purpose of gaining access to project sites. TASK: ENERGY USE AND DEMAND Appraisal In October 1980, Darbyshire & Associates completed a compre- hensive plan for the city of Bethel. This report presents a com- plete description of the community's population, economy, facili- ties and services, as well as housing. Retherford, in his 1980 reconnaissance study, projects a range of future electricity demand for Bethel and the surrounding villages. The "1980 Community Energy Survey" prepared by Dave Rusnell of the Division of Energy and Power Development will be available and provide updated data on energy uses in the Bethel area. Current studies and implementations of waste heat recovery systems and conserva- tion programs are numerous and show very promising results. Updated data are also available from the 1980 Census, state agencies, electricity and fuel suppliers, and other sources. Based on a preliminary review of these reports, there is a need to obtain more detailed information from the villages sur- rounding Bethel, to analyze the total energy demand and supply of the study area, and to base the electricity forecasts on a more detailed and updated analysis of future socioeconomic activities, cost of alternative energy sources, levels of electrical energy uses by consumer category, and the impact of conservation measures. Our methodology has been developed after an appraisal of the pertinent previous studies, including the work by Darbyshire Asso- ciates on the Bethel area. Considerable data are available from that study, as well as from the reconnaissance study by Retherford in 1980 and from the "1980 Community Energy Survey" prepared by Dave Rusnell of the Division of Energy and Power Development. Detailed basic data are lacking for the other villages surrounding Bethel, and will need to be obtained in this current study. Objective: The forecast will be developed in the following steps: 1. Initial assessment including review of previous studies, interviews with appropriate government agencies, major suppliers and consumers. 2. Collection of economic basic data, and energy sector base data by research, and by means of market surveys. 3. Forecast of economic activity of the Bethel area using an existing (Darbyshire) computer program. Extension of the economic forecast to the entire twelve-village re- gion will then be made. 4. Forecast of electrical energy and space heating demand of Bethel area and extension of the forecast to the twelve-village region. Scope Plan: Initial Assessment A thorough review of pertinent reports, socio-economic data and projections, and energy consumption will be done. Interviews will be conducted with representatives of electricity and fuel suppliers, and with major consumers to update our insights in fuel and electricity uses and costs, community development, and industrial and commercial expansion plans. The extensive amount of work done by the Alaska Institute of Social and Economic Research in their energy projections for the Railbelt area will be reviewed. Preliminary results of the Bat- telle Study on energy alternatives should also be available in early 1982, and their study will be reviewed. Visits will be made to generating plants, to review their present conditions. The waste heat recovery systems installed in Bethel, Unalska, Ouzinkie, and other villages will be analyzed. Weatherization programs and conservation incentives will be re- viewed to determine their impacts on the communities. A survey of several typical households in each village will be conducted, to determine the number, type and usage of electri- cal appliances in each. This will be checked against estimates by electric utilities and other research agencies. Results of the inital review will be analyzed to provide more specific procedure in the subsequent steps of study. Collection of Economic and Energy Base Data considerable basic data on the Bethel area have already been collected and processed into suitable form by Darbyshire & Associ- ates in preparing the Bethel 1980 Comprehensive Plan. The data served as input to the economic input-output computer model. In this data collection effort, the 1979 data utilized in the 1980 study will be updated, and will be entered in a new software package that Darbyshire has developed. The area's economic pro- file will be expanded, where appropriate, to disaggregate those economic sectors which are energy intensive. The energy basic data will be updated, refined and an energy balance diagram will be prepared for the City of Bethel, and each surrounding village in the study area. These diagrams will pre- sent a breakdown by energy supply sources (diesel, heating oil, wood, gas, coal, wind, hydroelectric, etc.), energy consumption among types of end-uses (space heating, water heating, transporta- tion, industrial uses, electricity generation), and actual energy uses and losses. Historical energy costs will be established. An electric energy balance diagram will be established in the same manner. Historical data on electric energy consumption by consumer categories (residential, commercial, industrial, mining, governmental, or other appropriate categories for which data are available) will be used. The utilities and their physical facilities supplying elec- trical energy will be defined. This will include the generating plants, transmission lines, major substations and distribution facilities, and the service areas. The efficiency, price and cost, and reliability of the present energy supply system(s) will be assessed as to how electric energy utilization, or conservation efforts are affected. Laws and regulations at both federal and state levels affect- ing the energy sector and influencing the demand and supply equa- tions will be identified. Potential changes in such laws and regulations will be factored into future projections. The economic base data and the energy base data will be rela- ted to establish energy consumptions in terms of forms of energy, categories of consumer, and amount of consumption. Energy requirements for space heating, water heating and cooking, will be given special consideration. A determination will be made of the cost of space heating by fuel oil, electricity, and coal. Recognition will be given to convenience, reliability, relative investment costs, and conversion costs of each energy source. Estimates will be made of the relative price change from each source that would be expected to result in their adoption by the consumer. Projections of Future Economic Profile The Darbyshire computer model, previously used for the Bethel Community Comprehensive Development Plan, will be used to make 20- year projections of economic activity, employment, population, fuel consumption, and electrical energy demand. First, the model will be modified where appropriate and feasible, so as to provide more accurate correlations of energy demands with economic, demographic and other key indicators. Then, prospects for changes over the next twenty years will be projected. These prospects have been established in connection with the Bethel 1980 comprehensive plan but require updating to include: federal budget changes expected state response to above changing OCS leasing schedules on-shore mining exploration and development fishery enhancements : regional transportation enhancements electric energy developments. oo000000 These projections will be submitted for review and comment by government officials and industry leaders prior to their adoption and use. The data will then be used in the computer model to derive estimates of the future direct and indirect demands on the local economy, the projected population, and the resulting future demand on energy, electricity, and space heating requirements. The resulting forecasts will be for Bethel only. It will be necessary to extend these forecasts to the other villages by use of multiple correlation techniques. The correlation parameters considered will include population, selected socio-economic characteristics of the population, total income, migration trends, commercial, industrial, federal, and state activities. Energy Forecast The electrical energy forecast developed from the preceding tasks will be adjusted and refined to arrive at the final energy forecast for this study. Adjustments will include introduction of factors not covered in the computer model such as: ° Effect of conservation efforts in electrical energy demand in the various energy-use categories; ° Adoption of the least-cost energy supply to meet space heating and other needs; ° Utilization of waste heat recovery systems with develop- ment of new thermal generating plants. The foregoing studies require as input the results of studies which forecast the costs of various forms of energy such as coal, fuel oil, hydroelectric power, etc., and the tariff levels of electricity. It also requires assumptions as to what type of energy development plan will eventually be adopted. This information is not available until near the end of this entire study. For this reason, energy forecasts will be made under different sets of assumptions regarding the eventual energy development plan. Electrical energy demand for the villages outside Bethel could be increased substantially if interconnection takes place as a result of the improvement in availability, reliability, and over the long term, price reductions. The forecasts will therefore be made to account for the likely dates that such interconnection may occur. Peak electrical demand (kilowatts) will be developed for each village in the isolated condition, and for the interconnected system. This will be accomplished by relating the energy demand to peak load on a historical basis and extending them to the fu- ture. Also, reference will be made to load factor trends of other comparable markets in Alaska, to establish if any adjustments will be required. The computer model provides electrical energy demand on a seasonal basis. Peak demands also will be projected on a seasonal basis. TASK: THERMAL AND OTHER GENERATION i) Introduction | This task describes study activities related to assessing i thermal power generation and wind generation. Other generation a forms are not discussed herein because there is no evidence that oy resources exist which could warrant significant study of other i types of generation. An exhaustive accounting of the feasibility Lt of all commercially available technology will be made during the study and conclusive evaluations will be provided. ud This task is organized into the following sequence: Coal Resources Thermal Power Generations, Cogeneration, Waste Heat Recovery Wind Generation | Coal Resources Appraisal: The Bethel Reconnaissance Study (Retherford, 1979) indicates that coal is not a feasible alternative to hydropower development ; due to the poor mineability of the only local coal source -- the ,! Nulato Coal Field. Then, assuming that coal could be delivered Le for $117 per ton, Rutherford goes on to show that coal would cost $0.21 per kWh versus $0.126 for 1979 diesel generation. cy Presumably because of the high cost differential, the coal ii alternative was not carried into the Economic Feasibility Section. The Project Team does not consider that the coal alternative LS should be dismissed for the following reasons: 4 | 1. Coal can be economically barged over long distances and Ls still be delivered at cost lower than the $117 per ton used by Retherford. 1 2. A smaller scale coal plant (4 MW) was compared to a larger (8.4 MW) existing diesel capacity. 3. Labor and OM&R may have been overestimated for the coal alternative by Retherford. 4. Once coal is supplied to Bethel for electric generation, it can also be used to provide space heating at a cost much lower than is currently possible with diesel heating. 5. Coal utilization can provide local or Alaska jobs as compared to diesel usage which depends on imported sources, 6. Coal costs can be expected to escalate at or around the general inflation rate, whereas diesel is likely to escalate at a faster rate. Objectives: The factors listed above might prove sufficient to render coal more economic than diesel generation or even more economic than the proposed hydroelectric plan. In order to definitively evaluate the coal alternative, the Project Team proposes a thorough analysis which evaluates coal feasibility on a comparable basis with all other alternatives. Such an analysis involves evaluation of coal resource availability, mineability, transportation options, and combustion/generation technology. The quantity of coal demanded determines, in part, the suitability of available coal sources. All that is needed is an estimate of conversion efficiency. In order to facilitate comparison among alternative quality coal resources, quantity will be expressed in terms of standard tons, which have value of 10,000 BTU's per pound. Once tonnage is specified, all sources will be identified which are adequate to meet the demand cost effectively. This involves simultaneous consideration of mining costs and transporation costs. As noted above, candidate coal sources are not limited to nearby sources. As demonstrated in the Northwest Alaska Coal Study, it is often more economic to barge in coal from distant large mines than it is to mine nearby resources and move coal over land. This is due to both higher costs for land transport and the diseconomics inherent in small-scale mines. Cost of coal, f.0.b. mine, will be computed for existing and potential mines in Alaska, Canada, and the Lower 48. These will include (but not be limited to) Beluga Coal (Susitna Field), Nenana Field, Cape Beaufort Area Fields, Chicago Creek, Nelson Island, Flat Unalakleet, and other fields which APA designates as potential sources. Where the fields are currently being mined, the actual cost per ton will be estimated based on published sources and consultation with Dr. Rao of the Mineral Industry Research Laboratory. Cost of coal from the Lower 48 will be examined by using the most economic source (per standard ton) available at the Ports of Seattle and Portland. Transportation Analysis The cost of transporting coal by the most economic available means will be determined for each potential coal source identified. This cost, when added to the cost of the coal itself, establishes the cost of coal delivered to Bethel. Both Foss and Crowley Maritime currently serve Bethel, According to representatives of these firms, barges up to 400 feet long can be brought to Bethel. Such a barge would have a 12,000 ton capacity which could be leased for about $15,000 per day (including tug). This results in a cost per ton/mile of about $0.03. Thus, a 1,000 mile haul would cost not more than $30 per ton. This estimate may be high because coal from Seattle is currently being shipped to Bethel (for space heat) in containers at a tariff of $100.00 per ton. Bulk shipment in large barges should be considerable cheaper. Environmental Impacts of Coal Generation Since mining will most likely occur at a site remote from the Bethel area, possibly at an existing mine site, the environmental impacts of mining will be evaluated only to the extent required to assess potential effects on mining costs and viability of opening up new mines. The environmental impacts of the coal alternative will be restricted to land use, economics, water quality and air quality. Under land use, the space requirements for the generating plant and the coal storage area are to be included in the proposed study. The economic impacts of coal power generation (and heating) on local economy will be discussed. The major environmental impact which will result from coal combustion will relate to air quality. An air quality specialist will determine: 1. The likely air quality impacts of the alternative generation plant configurations. 2. The need for compliance with PSD requirements (generally a 25 MW plant will be classified as a major air pollution source and thus require PSD compliance). 3. Assess the permitting and licensing complexity of alternative plant configurations. 4. Evaluate the need for and cost of mitigation measures. Thermal Power Generation, Waste Heat Recovery, Cogeneration Appraisal: Thermal generation, waste heat recovery systems and cogeneration will be evaluated for potential inclusion in all plans at the appropriate capacity or scale for meeting criteria and standards established for the overall plan. The Base Case Plan will utilize existing diesel generation, its continued use, and examine development of waste heat recovery for district heating. Also included will be the assessment and potential for continued use of oil in oil-fired thermal plant production of electrical energy with waste heat recapture for district heating as a total system approach for reducing electric energy and space heating costs (such as the system being installed at Bethel by Bethel Utilities Corporation ). The second alternative plan will be based on a comprehensive review and updating of alternatives previously identified in other studies. The results of the evaluation of potential for economic delivery of coal to the Lower Kuskowim River from distance sources will be used to assess the economic viability of coal fired generation. Various scales of coal plant generation will be assessed to determine the potential economic viability of plant unit size to meet future growth in demand as well as operational and reliability criteria. This alternative will carefully assess plan elements in detail to establish that costs are reasonable, the resource is adequate, and environmental restraints can be satisfied with proven and commercially available technologies and equipment. ( -10- Scope Plan: The work will be provided in two phases identified as follows: WDANHAU HW Phase I Data Search and Review Site Investigation ° Installed Diesel Generation Waste Heat Recovery Analysis Coal-fired Mine Mouth Plant Analysis Oil-fired Thermal Plant Analysis Energy and Space Heating Forecast Generation Equipment Sizing District Heating Potential Interim Report, Findings, and Presentation Phase II Base Case Description and Detailed Determination of the Optimum Generation Plan for Each Generation Technology Oil-Fired Thermal Generation Coal-Fired Thermal Generation Diesel Generation Waste Heat Recovery for District Heating 0000 Alternate Energy Plans Using Mixed Concept (Example) ° Diesel Generation in each Village Inter-tied to a Distribution Grid with Wind Generation Units "Floating on the Line" Provide Development of Conceptual Design for each Alternative with Cost Estimates Provide Economic Analysis of each Alternative Plan. Based on Construction Cost, Engineering Operation and Maintenance Costs, Financing Costs, for all Plant and Distribution Systems Based on 1982 Dollars Provide Construction Schedule, as a Bar Chart Showing each Alternative Project Construction Sequence, Item for -ll- Co Phase II ° Construction, Procurement, Lead Item Procurement, Start- up, Training Program and Construction Management Costs. Data search. Investigation and analysis of existing generation in each village. All existing diesel generation equipment will be inspected and analyzed for conversion/retro-fit for waste heat recovery potential and capacity including, existing siting at each village in relation to the heating load, for district heating application at schools, community buildings, vehicle shop and storage structures, and residences. Investigate the condition of all electrical distribution systems for safety compliance and the ability to readily expand. Compile all data collected into an organized form for use as the basis of a more detailed analysis required for assessment under Phase II. Phase I will provide a detailed "Base Case" analysis utilizing data secured and organized in Phase I. The results of the coal resources activity will be factored into this phase. Potential energy plans involving thermal generation, wasteheat recapture and cogeneration potential will be identified for each village and an area-wide plan with alternatives will be examined. Peak loads will be analyzed and a thermal generation plan with appropriate conservation systems will be established for each village for optimum low cost energy production and generation mode. Coal and oil fired thermal generation plants for central and remote locations will be defined and delineated conceptually, with estimated delivered energy costs and plant and development cost estimates. -12- \.-- on 3 fo) Alternate energy plans having a mixed concept will also be investigated. In the mixed concept, attention will be given to the technologies of wood peat, wind, and fossil fuel as competing plans. Each will be evaluated on the basis of economics, environmental considerations, ease of, an simplicity of, operation, with proven commercialy available equipment having a track record of reliability. ° Each mixed concept plan will be developed with generation kWh cost, and estimated construction cost. Wind Energy Assessment Appraisal: There are several studies that have addressed the wind power potential of the area in Wentink (1974, 1975, 1976, and 1978), Robert W. Retherford and Associates, and the most recent "The Wind Energy Resource Atlas-The Alaska Region", by Wise et al. (1980). All except the latter have used only mean wind speed, and applied a Weibul distribution of wind speeds, for determining wind power density. There are more comprehensive wind data available than in the reports mentioned above. Data available in the Alaska Climate Center at AEIDC could be useful for a more thorough assessment of the area's wind power potential. A proper assessment should make better use of existing data, suggest specific sites for additional wind measurements, and choose prospective sites for Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) installation. The development of an alternative plan involving wind generators requires working closely with the team designated to the task of Energy Supply Plans. The wind system requires interface with a base load system - whatever it is. Load management and conservation play a critical role in the ability to use the wind resource. Transmission line interties open up the possibility of a more dispersed wind grid and could sharply reduce construction cost for foundations and pole setting. Field information will also be required which can be obtained by someone trained in wind generator site selection. Load forecasts including reactive demands and peaks will be necessary to develop reasonable scenarios. Additionally an assessment of the present condition of the diesel electric grid will be necessary for accurate cost estimates in each plan. -13- Objective: To quantify the amount of energy in the wind regime of the Bethel area. and to evaluate and assess the potential for utilization of wind energy for electrical production in the Bethel area. Wind power is to be considered as a supplementary resource to fuel oil or any alternative base load facility. In the base . case plan the diesel electric grids will be analyzed for possible inclusion of load management and conservation coupled to a small scale wind generator system. The second alternative plan will include evaluation of a wind farm concept in conjunction with other energy supply options identified. Scope Plan: The work will be split into two phases. Phase I will be a general feasibility analysis of electric power generation, by wind, (including resistive heating) in the Bethel area. Phase II will follow up the activities of Phase I with a more detailed analysis coupled with specific identification of hardware and locations for the wind systems. Work Plan - Wind Energy Analysis Phase I ° Data Search - Available wind information will be collected and compiled to estimate persistence, seasonal variations, velocity distribution, and contours of wind power. A search of published reports on wind energy in Alaska in general, and the Bethel area in particular, will be made and previous conclusions will be summarized. Then a more comprehensive analysis of existing data will be accomplished. Only one location in the area has a long history, over 40 years, namely Bethel. However, Akiak, Kalskag, Nyak, Tooksok, and Quinhagak also have limited data available, most of it in the climate center files. ° Site Identification - Judgements will be made from the available data as to potential desirable wind energy generation sites. The power production potential will be estimated from wind turbine performance curves and velocity distribution.graphs. An examination of contour maps of the area will be performed to locate prospective sites for WECS installation and a program for additional -14- wind measurements will be proposed to fine-tune the wind energy assessment of the area. ° Hardware Reliability and Availability - The wind generator systems which are commercially available will be evaluated for actual or expected performance in the Bethel area. Operation and maintenance schedules will be identified as well as useful life. Phase II ° Wind generator grid penetration - Three scenarios will be developed which describe: (1) a minimal level of penetration of wind generator capacity into a grid (5- 15%); (2) a medium level (10-30%); and (3) a maximum level (30-80%). The ramifications for control schemes, load management, and storage will be evaluated for each scenario. The penetration levels will then be applied to each village with an adequate resource. ° Restraints Identification - Regulatory, institutional, or regional restraints to the different levels of utilization will be identified and discussed as to their possible effect on utilization. ° Economic Analysis - The cost of installing, designing, operating and maintaining the systems described will be developed based on actual construction experience with such hardware in Alaska. ° Facility Construction Schedule - A bar schedule showing start-finish periods including engineering, procurement, construction and start-up of a typical facility will be developed. Feasibility of the Gas Alternative (Option) Background The APA states in the RFP that "...private entities have discovered significant natural gas resources at Bethel." Informal conversations with APA staff members indicated that specifies on the find are confidential and will not be revealed at this time. In the absence of more detailed information, we will assume that the resource is onshore and will not be extensive enough to justify liquification and LNG tanker transport to other areas. -15- The following discussion presents our approach to assessing the gas alternative and is not a part of the work plan. Objectives: The purpose of the Bethel Power Plan Feasibility Assessment is to evaluate all reasonable alternatives to the Kisaralik Hydroelectric Plan, before proceeding with development of power in the area. Since natural gas may be a competitive source of electrical power, it must be evaluated on a comparable basis with other alternatives. Dames & Moore has completed more than a dozen technology assessments involving development of Alaska's natural gas resources for the Bureau of Land Management and the State of Alaska. This experience will be valuable in assessing the feasibility of the gas alternative. Scope Plan: Evaluating the gas alternative will, like the coal alternative be based upon the interplay of resource, transportation and generation factors. These factors will be systematically explored as indicated below. Demand and Resource Evaluation Demand for gas for electric power users can be derived by applying a conversion efficiency factor to the load forecast. Economic development of natural gas reserves requires that production can be sustained over the useful life of the generating equipment, and in quantities sufficient to meet electrical demand. This requires knowledge of reserves and reservoir conditions. Cost of production is also a function of reservoir condition. Assuming that basic reservoir data are available, the economic engineering evaluation of gas production can be performed. Transportation The only feasible transport mode for natural gas in the Bethel area is via pipeline. The economics of the gas alternative will be very sensitive to pipeline length, which depends on the distance of the reservoir from Bethel and the environmental factors influencing pipeline alignment. Pipe line construction costs in the tundra will be carefully evaluated. Another gas alternative which might be more economic than transporting gas would be a well-head power plant with electrical transmission lines to Bethel (and surrounding villages). The -16- Co oo disadvantages of this approach is that cogeneration possibilities available if the generating plant is in Bethel are foregone. Both those gas alternatives will be evaluated. Generating Technologies The costs of using gas turbine electric generators to supply the electrical need to Bethel and surrounding communities will be computed on a levelized cost per kWh basis. Both in-town and well-head systems will be evaluated. For the alternative power of the power plant in Bethel, costs with and without a topping cycle cogeneration system will be evaluated. The environmental impacts of gas-fired electrical generation will result from exploration and development of the gas reserves, and from the effects of pipeline installation of maintenance. In addition, some slight air quality impact may be expected. The air quality will be degraded by the combustion of gas, but this effect should be more than offset by lower emissions from diesel power plants now in use. The land, air, and water impacts will be evaluated at a reconnaissance impact level. Cost of Gas-Fired Electric Power Finally, the levelized busbar cost of electricity will be calculated for plants serving Bethel alone, and for Bethel and surrounding communities, with and without cogeneration. Where cogeneration is used, the levelized cost per kWh will be reduced by the value of cogenerated heat. The lower cost alternative will be carried on to the final comparison of alternatives. -17- TASK: HYDROPOWER GENERATION The activities described below will be undertaken to assess the development of a hydroelectric project on the Kisaralik River near Lower Falls. The studies as outlined may require modifica- tion based upon results obtained through the course of study. Due to the study schedule for submission of a draft report on August 15, 1982, Mr. Wise, State Climatologist, was contacted for information about site access for field reconnaissance. He has indicated that we can expect a late January thaw that will permit fixed wing or helicopter reconnaissance and total snowpack melt permitting ground reconnaissance in late May. The hydropower generation task has been scoped and scheduled based on field re- connaissance in late May. The Hydropower Generation Task has been divided into the following sections: Hydrologic Investigation Geology and Geotechnical Investigation Hydroelectric Planning Investigation Power and Energy Operation Studies Cost Estimate and Construction Schedule o0o000 Hydrology Investigation Appraisal: The drainage area of the watershed above the proposed Golden Gate Damsite on the Kasaralik River has been estimated as 544 square miles (Retherford, 1980). A review of existing studies and data sources has shown that only a limited amount of data is avai- lable for the watershed. There has been no systematic precipitation data collection in the study region. Annual precipitation maps for the watershed, based on meterological reasoning, are available (NOAA AR-10). Additional precipitation data, including mean monthly, mean an- nual, rainfall frequency, and probable maximum precipitation, are published in reports of the National Weather Service (NWS TP 47) and an annual mean runoff at the damsite of 20 inches has been estimated (Kilday, 1974). A stream gage was installed about eight miles upstream of the proposed damsite by the USGS in May 1980 (WRD-USGS Alaska). The -18- data generated will be useful to the proposed studies. Long-term records from existing gages in nearby, similar watersheds will be used to supplement this record. The probable maximum flood (PMF) hydrograph has been estima- ted for the damsite. This PMF has a peak discharge of 480,000 cfs, with a Creager C-value of 160. The analysis was based on the procedure described by the U.S. Bureau of Reclama- tion. There are no available data or studies of watershed erosion and sediment yield for the project basin. Based upon field obser- vation of the watershed, sedimentation of the proposed reservoir will not be a serious problem. Available sediment data from near- by representative stations will be utilized. In the absence of suitable data, empirical methods, such as the Universal Soil Loss Equation (Ref. 8), will be used where appropriate. Objective: The primary objective of the hydrology investigation is to develop hydrologic and climatic information to support the plan- ning and conceptual design of a hydropower reservoir on the Kisaralik River. Scope Plan: Data Collection and Review. The Hydrology Investigation will be based on available hydrologic and climatic data compiled by the AEIDC, NWS, USGS and USBR. Previous studies available from the APA have been collected and are in hand. These sources have been helpful in the preparation of this proposal and will be fully utilized in performing the studies. Additional data needs will be identified and coordinated through AEIDC and APA, with no field activities anticipated at this level of study. Existing aerial photography if available, will be utilized to the extent pos- sible. Climatology. Climatic records of the Bethel area will be analyzed to identify streamflow records representative of long- term conditions. Nearly all applicable climatic data are availa- ble at the Alaska Climate Center at AEIDC. In addition to the long-term record at Bethel of precipitation, wind, etc., data on the frequency and movement of storms in the area are available. Concurrent climate and streamflow records at representative gaging sites will be compared with long-term climatic data to de- . -19- termine the period of streamflow records which is representative of the long-term conditions. This representative record will then be used as the basis for subsequent study. Streamflow. Daily streamflow at the Golden Gate Damsite will be estimated based on the results of the climatology studies. The selected representative streamflow records will be transposed to the damsite by using mean annual precipitation and drainage area ratios. The transposed data will be compared with the data col- lected at the gage upstream of the dam. This will be a rough comparison only, as it is unlikely that the short record at the damsite is representative of Kisaralik River streamflow. The variability of daily streamflow will be assessed using a flow-duration analysis. The analysis will be done on a monthly basis, and will serve as a key input to the power and energy studies. Floods. The PMF has been previously estimated for the Golden Gate Damsite using the technique described by the USBR. The same technique will be applied and proper assumptions about the required variables will be made. Harza has extensive experience in determinig the PMF for hydropower damsites. Construction works are normally designed to be protected against a flood peak of a specified recurrence interval, say 25 years. There is insufficient data available to perform an analysis of flood frequency at the damsite. Hence, the construc- tion diversion flood for the selected recurrence interval will be estimated based on empirical techniques defined by the USGS. Reservoir Sedimentation. Mean annual sediment inflow to the proposed reservoir will be estimated based on available sediment data for selected stations in the project region. The estimate will be based on unit yield for similar basins. Based on an estimated trap efficiency, reservoir sedimentation during the life of the reservoir will be estimated. The geomorphology of the river and its bed material downstream of the proposed damsite will be studied to assess the potential for channel degradation or aggradation problems. Geological and Geotechnical Investigation Appraisal: The 1980 reconnaissance study of the Golden Gate Hydroelec- tric Project presents summary statements for the selection of the -20- damsite at the "Lower Falls" location. The report states that the topography, configuration of the valley (V-shaped bend), more favorable geologic conditions and favorable siting for a side channel spillway offer advantages over other possible damsites on the Kisaralik River. Published geologic data on the area appa- rently is limited to the mapping of the Bethel quadrangle by the U.S.G.S. in 1959 (Hoare and Coonrad, Map I-285). The geology of the damsite is described very briefly in the report. The rock units are reported to be massive metasediments in which evidence of original bedding has been nearly obliterated. Two main joint sets are mentioned, both steeply dipping, and re- ference is made to major joint sets that cut both across and down- stream. No evidence of faulting was reported. Alluvial fill in the valley bottom is presumed to be only a few feet in depth and only a thin veneer of talus and colluvium is found on the abut- ments. The bedrock appears competent where scoured by the river, whereas on the abutment slopes the rock is frost riven and frac- tured. The selection of the "Lower Falls" site over other potential damsites on the Kisaralik River is based on comparisons between the selected site and other sites considered. The basis for site selection requires careful review and reevaluation in the present study including the foundation conditions for alternatives, al- though the conclusions in the 1979 report may be well founded, The description of the geologic and geotechnical characteris-— tics of the site are, at present, too general to permit a reviewer to make an independent evaluation of the compatibility of the proposed scheme to the site conditions. The dimensions and confi- guration of the gorge are not described, data on joint sets seems incomplete, spacing of joints in the sets mentioned is not given, the relationships of joints to the development of gorge topography is not considered and there is no basis provided for assessing the impact of the rock secondary structures (joints etc.) on the pre- ferred layout and constructability of the underground features. A site geology map showing the proposed project structures and the physiographic features of the site area is not available. Construction materials for rockfill could be obtained from either abutment according to the report. Aggregate for concrete was said to be unavailable from the gorge itself, but sandbars approximately one and one-half miles downstream contain well- graded sandy gravels. -21- Objectives: The principal objectives of the geologic and geotechnical investigations will be to confirm the damsite selection, observe “and record pertinent geologic data at the selected site in suffi- cient detail for project planning and cost estimating, and present the field data on a plan or plans adequate for the level of the proposed engineering studies. Scope Plan: Ground reconnaissance of the Lower Falls areas is precluded by snowpack until late May. Initially the geologic activities will be limited to review of regional and local geology and seismicity. Geotechnical engineers will assist the planning engineers by developing typical dam cross sections, and estimating cut slopes for use in the initial assessment studies. A site visit will be conducted in late May 1982 by a team of geologists and geotechnical engineers. Additional field work will be continued by a geologist. The anticipated field work will consist of surficial observations. No subsurface investigation work will be done. Blowups of aerial photos and USGS quadrangles will be utilized to develop base maps for plotting geological data. ( The investigations will proceed with geologic mapping of the selected site using pace and compass and altimeter methods for control. The various bedrock lithologies and their spatial relationships will be observed and recorded. Discontinuities in the bedrock mass, as observed in outcrop, such as joint attitudes and spacing, fracture development, and zones of closely spaced jointing or shearing, will be plotted on the selected base plan. Openness of joints, character of joint in-fillings, and the possibliltiy of ice-filling in joints will be noted. These data will be essential for geotechnical evaluation of the impact of site geology on the layout and constructibility of the dam, spillway, and underground structures. Reconnaissance of the reservoir area will be directed at assessing the long term stability of the reservoir rim and of reservoir water-tightness. Particular note would be taken of large rock masses which on failure, due to seismic shock or other- wise, could create a wave potentially damaging to project struc- tures ° ( -22- The rock quality and characteristics from the abutments and talus debris in the gorge will be inspected for their potential use in the dam. The sandbars about one and one-half miles downs- tream from the proposed dam axis will be visited. Samples will be obtained from pits dug by pick and shovel for sieve analysis, soundness and specific gravity tests and petrographic examination to determine potential for use as concrete aggregate. Our associates, Harding-Lawson Associates, will participate in the field reconnaissance activity and will provide specific insights based on their considerable experience with the local geology, climatic conditions and problems associated with cold weather engineering and construction, and in the assessment of seismic risk as outlined below. Prior to and during the field investigations, we would expect to consult with knowledgeable representatives of public agencies such as the Corps of Engineers, USBR, University of Alaska and USGS to gain their insights based on local experience with cold weather engineering problems. The location of major faults in the project region and the seismic activity associated with these faults is reasonably well documented and will serve well as a basis for assessing the level of seismic risk against which the project features must be desi- gned. It is understood that the project area is one where the effects of at least moderately large earthquakes can be felt. We would analyze air photos and remote imagery to evaluate the area of the site for possible unmapped faults which, if they were active, could result in shocks more damaging to the project than would shocks from more remote major faults such as the Denali or the Lee Clark Faults. Ground truth of any such observed potential faults would be attempted as part of the effort. Air photos and remote imagery analysis will be a useful tool in terrain analysis for selection of transmission line routes and access roads to remove these, insofar as possible, from areas of problem permafrost. Ground reconnaissance by helicopter would be made in selected areas to confirm the findings of the imagery analysis. -23- Hydroelectric Planning Investigation Appraisal: Several studies, with varying levels of detail, have been performed to identify the hydroelectric potential in and near the study area. The 1975 Alaska Power Administration report includes recom- mendations to proceed with studies for potential small-hydro sites near the villages surrounding Bethel and consider studies for the development of the Golden Gate Hydroelectric project. Two small-hydro studies were initiated and completed during the following six years. The 1979 APA/AVEC studies did not iden- tify economically feasible hydroelectric projects near the vil- lages of Akolmuit (Kasigluk and Junapitchuk) and Eek located with- in the proposed study area. The 1981 Corps of Engineers small- hydro inventory of southwestern Alaska identified 14 sites near communities that met the criteria established for the study; how- ever, in all cases economic feasibility could not be established. These studies indicate that feasible development of small-hydro in the delta area is severly limited by the gentle gradients of the streams and rivers of the area. The 1980 reconnaissance level studies on the Golden Gate Hydroelectric Project identified a development that would comprise a 300-foot high rockfill dam and spillway near Lower Falls on the Kisaralik River and an underground powerstation with 2-15MW units. The estimated average annual energy is 186,900 MWh. In April 1980 the FERC preliminary permit for this project was submitted. The dam was shown in the report to be a rockfill dam with an upstream asphaltic membrane with rockfill being obtained from either abutment. The upstream asphaltic membrane could present problems in construction and in durability during project operation. The report does not indicate whether other types of impervious barriers were studied nor does it present the advantages of the asphaltic membrane versus other types. Grouting the foundation rock is mentioned in the report but no other foundation treatment such as drainage, near surface crack treatment, or foundation shaping at the membrane contact is described. For purposes of preliminary spillway sizing the probable maximum precipitation and inflow flood design assumptions are adequate. However, the selection of the downstream hazard factor (DHF) of 60 percent for a reservoir with storage capacity of -24- 716,000 AF may not be conservative enough, when compared to present Corps of Engineers design flood standards. The spillway type and alignment are uncertain since the discharge capacity (87,000 cfs) and use of the side canyon exit would create energy dissipation and canyon wall erosion problems. Alignment with the Kisaralik River would be more suitable. The power tunnels and intake may require multi-level reservoir withdrawal to maintain downstream aquatic requirements. The powerstation identified in the report is an underground structure. We are uncertain whether this structure was compared on a cost basis with a surface powerstation arrangement. Objective: The objective of the hydroelectric planning investigations are to develop a Golden Gate Hydroelectric Project plan concep- tually designed and suited to the environment, market area energy needs, topography, geology, climate and at a level of confidence equal to the alternative forms of energy generation being consi- dered in this proposed study. Scope Plan: The hydroelectric planning investigations will proceed in two stages. The first stage, initial site assessment, will consist of review of the Lower Falls site, identification of alternative sites and optimization of the alternatives. The second stage will include site selection and feasibility assessment. This approach was developed to fulfill the requirements of the RFP and schedule study activities to correspond with the field reconnaissance limitations due to weather conditions discussed above. Initial Site Assessment Alternative Sites and Layouts. Data, mapping and reports not identified and reviewed for the preparation of this proposal will be collected, organized and analyzed at the beginning of this stage. Particular emphasis will be given to additional data re- quirements so that procurement of additional data can be initia- ted. A map study will be conducted utilizing USGS Quadrangle maps (1" = 5,280', 50-foot contour interval). During the study the Lower Falls site will be reviewed in detail and additional sites -25- will be identified and assessed for potential inclusion in the project layout studies. Preliminary layouts of alternative types of features and levels of development will be made to provide a basis for field investigations and for a preliminary cost estimate. These studies will include selection of the general arrangement of structures, and preliminary designs, quantity estimates, and construction procedures and costs for the major features. The initial step in planning layouts will be to define gene- val design and planning criteria necessay to maintain a consistent level of study for comparison and evaluation of the alternative arrangements. Dam alignment will be reviewed and general dimension esta- blished. Spillway type and alignment will be studied to accomo- date design floods, power water conductors will be located and di- mensioned. The powerstation type, location and installed capacity will be determined on a preliminary basis based on input from the power and energy operation studies. Transmission alignments and project access alternatives will be identified. Facilities that are needed to mitigate environmental impacts will be identified. For the initial assessment, preliminary cost estimates will be developed utilizing unit prices developed for other Alaska projects by Harza and Jacobs Associates. Cost curves such as, cost of reservoir versus normal reser- voir elevation, cost of power generation facilities versus capaci- ty and head, and transmission facilities of various lengths and capacities, will be developed to aid in the preliminary evalua- tions. The identified site(s) will be evaluated according to construction cost per kilowatt hour of firm energy generation at various levels of development. Field Reconnaissance During late May a detailed ground reconnaissance will be ’ conducted of the site(s) to acquire data and fix attention on the topographic, stratigraphic and structural relationships of the specific site(s) requiring inspection. As such, this field re- connaissance will be used to screen the identified sites and se- lect one or possibly two sites proposed from maps for final loca- tion of project features and identification and appraisal of access roads, landing strips, and transmission corridors. -26- Site Selection and Feasibility Assessment Site Selection. Subsequent to the initial site assessment and energy forecast activities, ground and environmental recon- naissance will allow the conceptual designs to be refined based on the constraints identified. The site(s) will be ranked based on firm energy production, project construction cost, constructibil- ity and practicality for discrete levels of development. A site will be identified and designated for further study. Feasibility Assessment. The selected project will be deve- loped in detail on the basis of the geological, geotechnical, hydrological and environmental data as they become available. The selected dam will be evaluated for suitability under artic conditions, seismicity and foundation conditions. The data collected during the geologic and geotechnical investigations will be evaluated and utilized in developing a dam cross-section which best fits the observed condition. It is anticipated that accep- table quality rock will be available to construct the major por- tion of the dam. Therefore, for our study, strong emphasis will be placed on the type of impervious barrier to be selected. Several alternatives will be considered. upstream asphaltic concrete membrane upstream concrete membrane upstream synthetic membrane central core of impervious or semi-impervious fill central core of asphaltic concrete o0000 Foundation treatment such as excavation in the abutments and valley floor, grouting, drainage and special treatment at the contact between the impervious barrier and the foundation will be evaluated based on the field data collected. The anticipated extent of the various treatments will be estimated. The stability of natural and cut slopes and the requirements for seepage control and drainage for pressure relief will be stu- died in the areas of major project structures and in the reservoir and tailrace areas as required. The construction requirements and the timing of operations with respect to the construction seasons will be refined and a cofferdam scheme developed. ( -27- The spillway layout will be refined to accomodate the design flood. The design of energy dissipators and the effect of their operation on the stability of the foundation of dam and slopes of the valley will be examined. The proper design of reservoir out- let works will be studied to provide safe operation under all operation conditions. The intake structure, located on an abutment will be refined for possible use as a diversion tunnel, as part of the power faci- lities or as outlet tunnels. The intakes may be multi-level to maintain downstream water quality. The selected powerstation type, size and location will be refined. The arrangement of the structure will be based on the dimensions of the major mechanical/electrical equipment, geotech-— nical characteristics, and water conductor arrangement. Based on the results of the power market assessment and the peak demand requirements, provision for a staged installation of generating equipment will be considered if required. The transformers and switchyard locations and design features will be selected on the basis of overall economy and operating conditions. Permanent operating facilities for the project including control facilities, landing strip, maintenance and support facili- ties, and housing for the permanent operating staff or remote control operation will be included in the overall plan of develop- ment. The location and type of maintenance and housing develop- ment will be developed in conjuncition with project access and environmental studies with special attention to all-season access and maintainability and overall energy efficiency. Selection of the size and number of turbines and generators will be based on the reservoir operation studies, power market assessment, transportation, access, and construction limitations. Due to the expected head range identified, Francis turbines will most likely be selected. : Transmission studies will involve refinement of routes, analysis of foundation conditions, segment length, and climatic condition effects. The scheme will be developed to ensure a com- patible voltage for connection to the Bethel grid formulated under other studies performed within this proposal. Drawings presenting plans and sections of the project fea- tures will be prepared at suitable scale for inclusion in the report documenting these studies and for quantity estimates of civil components used in the cost estimates. -28- The cost curves for cost of reservoir versus normal reservoir elevation, cost of power generation facilities versus capacity and head, and transmission facilities will be refined and used for the optimization of project features and the final selection of the project elevation, capacities, and stages of development. Power and Energy Operation Studies Appraisal: In the 1980 reconnaissance level study, data from the NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS AR-10 and twenty years of precipitation data for Bethel were analyzed. Dry year and average Kisaralik River flowrates were developed. Estimates of firm energy and secondary energy were developed based on these flow rates and considered conservative for the reconnaissance study power and energy estimates. To analyze the hydroelectric power and energy potential of the proposed project and its incorporation into a plan to supply power and energy to the Bethel area, further detailed evaluation of the Golden Gate Project hydroelectric potential is necessary. Synthesized streamflow data and discrete levels of development with their associated power and energy potential need to be defi- ned in relation to the forecasted electric energy requirements of the interconnected system. Objective: The objective of these studies is to provide an accurate assessment of the firm capacity and energy, and secondary energy available from the selected hydroelectric development. The re- sults will be formulated to meet the forecasted electrical energy and peak load requirements developed during the load forecast activities. Scope Plan: Power and energy studies will serve as a basis for the opti- mization of reservoir level and generating capacities and form a basis for the economic analysis of the hydropower project in com- parison with alternative expansion plans. For each development plan alternative, reservoir operation studies will be performed under various streamflow conditions and time periods. The input data will include synthesized monthly streamflow, reservoir area- volume curve, tailwater curves, plant performance curves, minimum -29- release requirements, drawdown limits or other operating constraints, and forecasted monthly electric load demands. These studies will be performed using a computer program that simulates reservoir operation with the data and constraints dis- cussed above. The studies will demonstrate the operation of each ‘alternative in an interconnected system. The program will deter- mine firm and average monthly power and energy production for a range of reservoir elevations and installed capacities. The pro- gram will also provide reservoir elevations at the end of each month for various exceedance levels. This information is necessa- ry for the evaluation of environmental impacts. Preliminary economic studies will be made to compare the costs of increasing reservoir elevation and installed capacity with the benefits derived by the power and energy produced. An incremental benefit- cost analysis will be made to determine the maximum reservoir elevation. Optimum installed capacity will be selected as a result of these studies. The project operation and optimization studies will be revi- sed during the feasibility assessment activity subsequent to field reconnaissance to accomodate project design concepts and mitiga- tion and enhancement measures identified as a result of the envi- ronmental studies. Cost Estimate and Construction Schedule Appraisal: A check of the prices as shown in the Detailed Cost Estimates prepared by Retherford 1980 (Table III-3) generally indicate lower unit costs in comparison with the prices developed for similar projects by Harza in eastern Alaska (Black Bear Lake) and with Contractor's unit prices for Tyee Lake Project, Green Lake Project (May 1979) and Swan Lake Dam (April 1981) all in south eastern Alaska. The Golden Gate Project is located in a remote and difficult site. The determination of construction costs requires a thorough understanding of the logistic problems and solutions related with mobilization, support services, expediting, labor availability, etc. involved in projects of this nature and location. Harza's involvement in projects in remote locations through- out the world coupled with the experience of Jacobs Associates in Alaska gives a strong background to develop a realistic construc- tion schedule and cost estimate. -30- Objective: To develop construction procedures and costs representative of actual costs of construction in Alaska at a level of confidence sufficient to permit comparison of alternative plans of development. Scope Plan: Construction Procedures The project will be analyzed from the standpoint of construc- tability, with consideration given to access, weather conditions, environmental constraints, location of construction material sour- ces, labor availability, and types of construction equipment required. Seasonal considerations are of particular importance and will be analyzed carefully. Seasonal effects on productivity, equipment and labor requirements, rates of production, and protection of the work in progress against seasonal risks will be studied. Unit Price Analyses To develop cost estimates unit prices will be developed. A review of basic data such as hourly labor costs, fringe benefits, hourly construction equipment costs, work shifts, and construction material costs will be performed. This will be based on our experience in Alaska, our current review of contracts bids on other APA projects, and a review of Alaskan cotractor's costs for similar works. These costs will reflect the remoteness of the site, and other cosiderations related to the weather and access conditions. The unit prices for all significant items of civil works will be estimated by the contractor's cost method. The required labor, equipment, supplies, and rates of production will be estimated on a basis consistent with the constructibility analysis and the adopted construction procedure and schedule. Estimated mark-ups for the constractor's indirect costs and profit will be added. The costs of plant equipment will be based on available data and experience costs from other Alaskan projects, with confirmation of the most significant costs of major equipment by preliminary quo- tations from representative manufacturers. The direct cost estimates obtained on the preceding basis will be increased by allowances for contingencies, engineering, and owner's overhead costs for the project on the basis of pre- vious experience. The estimates for engineering costs will be -31- Loe Kn supported by a detailed analysis of the field investigations and design work which will be required, based on the knowledge of site conditions developed during the study, the types of structures called for in the adapted initial project design, and the planned construction schedule. The resulting construction cost estimate will be based on the cost levels of a stated date. The estimate will be used for the optimization of project features and the final selection of the project elevation, capacities, and total development. The cost estimates will follow the format established by the FERC Uniform System of Accounts. Operation and Maintenance Costs The operation and maintenance costs associated with the selected hydroelectric alternative and appurtenant works will be estimated. These costs will be developed from required inspection and maintenance programs covering all of the facilities. The estimates will utilize industry experience data analyzed and published by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Bureau of Reclamation, as well as Harza's experience with similar project. All costs will be adjusted for conditions in Alaska. Construction Schedule A construction schedule will be developed based on detailed analysis of the methods and procedures and the required quantities for the project. The construction schedule will consider environmental constraints, material supply and control, manpower and equipment requirements and availability, and the sequence of construction operations. -32- TASK: ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES Fishery Resources and Acquatic Habitat Appraisal: The entire Kisaralik River has been inventoried only once, and that by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game during a two- year study of the lower Kuskokwim River and Bay in 1976-1977. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fish Division, has been conducting fishery research of the Kuskokwim systems since 1960 but most of the work on fish stocks involved enumeration, human utilization, and basic life history studies of five Pacific salmon species. According to ADF&G, the Kisaralik River contains the following fish species: Arctic lamprey, king salmon, chum salmon, pink salmon, silver salmon, rainbow trout, Arctic charr, round whitefish, humpback whitefish, broad whitefish, least cisco, Arctic graylng, boreal smelt, longnose sucker, northern pike, blackfish, and slimy sculpin (ADF&F 1978). Also thought to be present but not captured are red salmon, sheefish, Bering cisco, pond smelt, burbot, and ninespine stickleback. Lake trout are found in Kisaralik Lake. The Kisaralik contains an important sport and commercial fishery. Rainbow trout, grayling, charr, and silver salmon are important sport species, and most fishing is done along the mid- section, between Mile 20 and 40, of the Kisaralik River. Chum, king, and silver salmon are important commercial species. Spawn- ing habitat for these species is mostly between Mile 24 to 42 of the Kisaralik River. Access to this section is generally by boat. Chum, king, and silver salmon spawning is also known to take place above the Golden Gate Falls where approximately 10,000 chum salmon reportedly spawn each year (Retherford 1980). ° Evaluation of Relative Environmental Impacts The area covered by these investigations will include the entire Kisaralik River, and the area to be traversed by any project transmission lines. Objective: To assess fish species composition and seasonal use of fishery habitats with emphasis on anadromous and resident species using the ‘upper Kisaralik drainage. -33- Scope Plan: AEIDC will conduct fisheries studies in close consultation with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to document the distribution of, and habitat use by, anadromous and resident fish in the Kisaralik River and its Major tributaries. Extensive literature reviews will be conducted for all pertinent fishery reports concerned with this area on the lower Kuskokwim River. Appropriate additional information on the Kisaralik River will also be obtained by consultation with biologists, local residents, and commercial and recreational users familiar with the area. Assessments of fish present in the Kisaralik River will include species identification, relative abundance, and habitat characteristics. Fish samples will be randomly taken during a spring (May-June) and a summer (July) field trip by one or more of the following methods: (1) experimental gillnet, (2) minnow traps, (3) angling, and (4) visual observation. The Kisaralik River and its major tributaries will be investigated on foot and by air to delineate spawning areas. Minnow trapping, angling, netting, and visual observation will be used to define rearing habitat of present fish species. Determining the species of fish along with the location and characterization of the area's spawning and rearing , grounds will be a major focus of the research. Stream aréas immediately below and above (inundation area) the proposed Golden Gate Damsite and any areas deemed most critical by regional biologists will receive major emphasis. Invertebrate Organisms Appraisal: An important habitat component for juvenile salmon and trout is food-production areas. Fish density may be regulated by food abundance which may relate to the substrate or the surrounding land. Data concerning aquatic invertebrate populations in the Kisaralik River is extremely scarce. Some stomach content data is available from the ADF&G survey for 1977. Objective: To define species composition of primary invertebrates in the upper Kisaralik drainage. -34- Scope Plan: AEIDC will collect stream bottom fauna during spring and summer field trips using a Surber sampler. Bottom samples will be screened, washed, and preserved in 70 percent alcohol for laboratory analysis. Water Quality Appraisal: The Kisaralik River originates in the Kilbuck Mountains at the Bristol Bay divide, and flows 110 miles northwest into the Kuskokwim River 40 miles above Bethel near Akiak. It has two major headwater lakes and seven tributaries. The drainage area encompasses 1,070 square miles. It is a swift, rapidly dropping river over most of its course with the upper section Under this task, the existing environmental and physical conditions of the general project area will be identified and those factors of particular relevance to the overall study will be evaluated. At this stage of project investigations, aspects that may be critical for a go/no go decision or for accurate cost estimating will be given priority. Relative environmental impacts of the various project alternatives will be identified and evaluated. The following areas of activity are included under this task: ° Fishery Resources and Aquatic Habitat ° Invertebrate Organisms ° Water Quality ° Wildlife Populations and Habitats ° Vegetation Component ° Environmental Effects of Transmission Network ° Archaeological/Cultural Resources ° Geomorphologic Characteristics -35- Fisheries, wildlife and other natural resources of the Kisaralik area support some of the highest Native subsistence uses in the State; thus environmental impacts would be of great concern to local people and to agencies with resource management responsibilities. The Kisaralik River is also a candidate for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River System. The environmental assessment unit of this study consists of drainage areas of Kisaralik Lake Basin and river system extending from the high divide to delta lowlands where the river branches to join the Kuskokwim River near the village of Akiak. With the exception of Dall sheep and mountain goats, most mammals present in Alaska occur in the area but many occur only in low numbers. In lowland habitats, migratory birds form conspicuously large populations during the breeding period. Waterfowl populations have been studied in great detail and much documented material is available on nesting ecology and production of waterfowl utilizing refuge habitats. Raptors are reportedly more common in the mountainous portion where hawks, falcons and owls find nesting eyries; detailed population characteristics are not known, however. Similarly, reconnaissance work on mammal populations has at best been minimal in the upland portions of the assessment area. Resident wildlife include caribou, moose, and two bear species. Moderate to low population levels have been cited for these species. Additional reconnaissance work is needed to determine whether or not local populations of large mammals are stable in terms of time and space or merely reflect seasonal concentrations. Fur animals of primary importance are wolverine, mink, weasel, river otter, red fox, beaver and muskrat. Objectives: To assess seasonal/year-round distribution and relative abundance of big mammal and bird populations as well as to relate geomorphologic and vegetation characteristics in order to quantify and qualify wildlife habitats and migration routes. Scope Plan: A comprehensive literature review will be undertaken to assemble existing information describing use of the project area by wildlife. Considering the paucity of published material for mammals, investigators will necessarily have to access unpublished and file reports and records maintained by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These resource management agencies have compiled considerable information on waterfowl of the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta. Interviews -37- A stream gage was installed on the Kisaralik River by the USGS in May 1980. Data generated by this gage has not yet been utilized as a source of hydrologic information. Mean monthly and annual precipitation records have been the only source available for mean annual runoff figures. Limited water quality data was taken by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game during their fisheries inventory survey in 1977. Water chemistry analysis consisted of temperature, pH, alkalinity and hardness, Objectives: To define the seasonal physical and chemical structure of the upper Kisaralik River. Scope Plan: Water quality investigations will be conducted so that the interrelationships between physical, chemical, and biological indices can be related to fish and wildlife production. Water quality studies will be undertaken after consultation with USFWS, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Extensive literature reviews will include any pertinent water quality reports for this area of the lower Kuskokwim drainage. Water quality parameters such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and conductivity will be taken during both spring (May-June) and summer (July) field trips. Water quality measurements will be obtained with a YSI model 33 salinity/ conductivity/temperature meter, pocket thermometer (-35°C to 50°C), YSI Model 51B oxygen meter, and a portable field pH meter. Additional water samples will be collected and returned to Anchorage to be analyzed for total dissolved solids, suspended solids, hardness, alkalinity, turbidity, nutrients, and significant ions by Chemical and Geological Laboratories of Alaska, Inc. Special attention will be paid to the presence of abnormally high mercury levels or other heavy metals, since the Kisaralik flows through a known metal/mineralized geologic formation. Wildlife Populations and Habitats Appraisal: The potential Kisaralik hydropower project is located within the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge and, as public land, it is principally managed for wildlife and wildland resource purposes. -36- with agency personnel assigned to the Bethel district and knowledgeable residents (such as local trappers, hunters, and sport fishermen) will be conducted to supplement these data. This approach will assemble both current and historical information on wildlife and habitat condition within the Kisaralik region. Field sampling will be undertaken seasonally by a team of wildlife biologists using reconnaissance methods. This effort will address significant data gaps identified by the literature review as well as provide current information on wildlife populations and habitat status. Lists of amphibians, birds, and mammals known or likely to occur within the study area will be compiled. These lists, based on literature review, will be augmented by field observations. Data collected through field reconnaissance and literature review will be synthesized to describe wildlife and habitat types ina regional perspective. Supplemental information on unique or otherwise important habitats (e.g. migration routes) will be acquired during aerial and foot reconnaissance. Any actual or potential use of the project area by endangered/threatened species will be examined by combined use of literature reviews, personal use of literature reviews, personal interviews, and field work. Three Alaska birds are presently considered either threatened or endangered. These are the Eskimo curlew (Numenius borealis), the Aleutian Canada goose (Branta canadensis leucopareia), and two races of the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum and F. p. tundrius). Two of these species are known to breed in western Alaska but some may occassionally occur only as migrants. As appropriate, seasonal distribution of big game, and other important species, will be assessed using information collectively obtained by field survey, habitat/vegetation mapping, personal interviews and literature reviews. Subjective population estimates of resident species will be produced as information allows. These estimates will be based on AEIDC field data as well as on past records and findings of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Emphasis will be placed on national and regional interest species, e.g. moose, bears, raptors, etc.; other populations will be described in more general terms unless field reconnaissance can be used as a means of estimating relative abundance. An aerial reconnaissance will commence late in April when most species of wildlife are restricted in range. Some ground reconnaissance will provide detailed data and serve to "truth" results of the aerial effort. Approximately 14 man-days are =39— planned for this purpose. A second series of replicate reconnaissance flights will be scheduled for July. These flights will provide insight on the location of special use areas such as bear denning and summer feeding areas. A helicopter will be employed for these surveys as this has proven to be the most effective platform from which to observe past denning activity of bears, calf-rearing and shifting of animals to different feeding ranges. Fourteen man-days will be allotted for this series of reconnaissance. A third series of replicate reconnaissance survey will be conducted late in the summer to complete data gathering on composition and distribution of resident wildlife. This final effort will require approximately eight man-days of effort. Actual timing and degree of effort expended on each field trip will ultimately depend on seasonal phenology. A comparative field evaluation of alternative development plans will be made by an interdisciplinary team composed of a fishery biologist, a wildlife biologist, and a plant ecologist. This will provide the basis for evaluating environmental effects associated with the various project alternatives. Survey results will compare relative project effects on vegetation and wildlife likely to occur under each alternative. The implications of habitat alteration through project construction will be summarized. { Vegetation Component Appraisal: No specific vegetation studies have been conducted in the Kisaralik River system, but the primary vegetation components of the region are known. Pertinent data include: ° NASA U-2 Infrared photography at a scale of 1:60,000 and black and white aerial photography at a scale of 1:120,000 are available for the upper Kisaralik Basin. Coverage extends from the upper falls to about eight miles below Golden Gate Falls. ° Landsat data is available for the entire drainage and may be useful for delineating timber and brush areas. ° Limited large scale BLM photography is available in the Akiak area at the confluence of the Kisaralik and Kuskokwim rivers. 4 -39- Objectives: Vegetation is one of the components of ecological systems which determine use and potential use by animal life. The objective of the vegetation study will be to obtain sufficient information to recognize the vegetation types to be lost or changed as a result of the project. Scope Plan: The vegetation study will provide a basis for judgement of faunal changes that could result from the project. A preliminary vegetation type map with a one inch to a mile scale will be prepared from existant aerial photography of the whole impoundment area and of riparian communities downstream to a point where seasonal flooding is no longer an influence on vegetation community structure. Preliminary map inspection indicates that this point occurs in the vicinity of the confluence of the Kisaralik and Nukuluk rivers. Mapping intensity will be at Level II of the preliminary classification system for Alaska vegetation developed by Viereck, Dyrness, and Batten (1980). Vegetation along proposed transmission rights-of-way will also be evaluated and mapped. On the ground field examination and aerial reconnaissance will be necessary to verify mapping products. Environmental Effects of Transmission Network Appraisal: Alternative plans for power generation will consider transmission intertie of villages as well as transmission lines from power generation located remote from the population center, Bethel. The area to be traversed by this network is part of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, an area which ranks among the richest avifaunal regions in Alaska. Taken as a whole, this area constitutes one of the most productive waterfowl production units in North America. Construction and operation of this network could conceivably influence local biotic assemblages in several ways. Transmission lines constructed perpendicular to flyways are often a significant mortality factor. Death occurs as birds collide with power poles and lines. More subtle effects could also occur. Some avian species utilize portions of the electro-magnetic spectrum for navigation. Operations of this net might influence the migratory behavior of some species. Finally, some vegetation may have to be =40— cleared in the rights-of-way for road access, construction, and maintenance purposes. Since vegetation is essential for all higher forms of life, alteration of existing communities can be expected to influence local faunal assemblages. Objective: To estimate likely effects of the proposed electrical transmission grid on local biota. Scope Plan: A comprehensive search will be conducted for literature describing the biological effects of electrical transmission line construction and operation. Topics searched will include the effects of clearing rights-of-way on biotic communities and the influences of induced electromagnetic fields on life. Since patterns of avian use will in part determine the degree of mortality likely to occur through collisions, the literature describing such use will also be searched. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Appraisal: Although available evidence implies that man has been present in what is now southwestern Alaska for at least 8,000 years (Laughlin and Marsh 1964; Black and Laughlin 1967) very little is presently known of the pre-history of this region. At the time of first Russian contact, the area was inhabited by Kuskomiut Eskimos. Precontact inhabitants of the region relied solely on subsistence-based activties for their sustenance and, unlike coastal groups, they were heavily dependent on the region's terrestrial fauna. This circumstance implied a fairly mobile lifestyle. The recorded history of the region is also brief, despite efforts of ethnographers since the 1930's. Russian attempts to penetrate this remote, seemingly inhospitable region date from 1816, but it was not until the early 1840's that they established a permanent presence there. Russian influence in the area is reflected primarily in the concentration of numbers of aboriginals in and around trade centers which also provided missionary services. Purchase of Alaska by the United States in 1867 had little immediate influence on the inhabitants. American traders replaced -A4l- WS Russians, the Moravian Church replaced the Russian church. Soon after purchase, the Alaska Commercial Company established a post at the native village of Mumtrekhlogamute which in time became known as Bethel. However, trade with the region remained low until gold was discovered throughout the Kuskokwim drainage in 1907. In time, the Kuskokwim became a major trade artery to the interior. Objective: To determine the cultural resources (archaeological and historical) of the study area. Scope Plan: A search of all relevant published and unpublished data pertinent to the study will be accomplished. As a first step in this process, the files of the Alaska State Historic Preservation Office in Anchorage will be searched to identify known historical and archaeological sites. A literature search of these sites will then be made. The information from these sources will provide a basis for determining whether project construction would adversely affect any known cultural resource. Results of the survey will be summarized into a narrative format. The following guidelines for the study of the cultural resources of the project area will be followed and are quoted from 1. A descriptive inventory of the cultural resources affected by the proposed action. 2. Maps showing the location, density, and distributional pattern of the resources in relation to relevant natural and environmental factors; and delineation of the areas of potential environmental impact. 3. Evaluation of the potential of this historical, scientific, and social significance of the resources, including identification of resources in, pending nomination to, or considered eligible for, inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. The predictable adverse and benefical effects of the proposed action on the resources. -42- 5. A recommended program for lessening the direct, indirect, and/or cumulative adverse effects on the resources. 6. Description and evaluation of unavoidable adverse effects. 7. Description of the relative intensity of impact for each alternative of the proposed action if there are unresolved resources conflicts. 8. An evaluation of the relationship between the short-term commitment of the archaeological resources to mitigation and/or destruction versus their conservation for long- term purposes. 9. A statement concerning the commitment of archaeological resources to impacts that are irreversible and/or irretrievable. Geomorphologic Characteristics Objective: The objective is to determine surface geomorphology, sediment and soil stability, erosion potential, and potential for mineral development. These parameters will be defined both regionally and specifically for the corridor within the Kisaralik River valley and along the proposed transmission line intertie routes. Scope Plan: AEIDC will conduct a comprehensive literature review and synthesis of all available information on geomorphology, surficial geology, soils, minerals, permafrost, and erosion within the project area including the Kilbuck Mountains and the Kuskokwim River delta. Areas of unstable soil conditions and high erosion potential will be delineated, especially where proposed project construction will be directly affected by, or directly affect, these conditions. Potential effects on water quality in fish streams, due to siltation caused by construction-induced erosion, especially at proposed stream crossings of transmission lines or service roads, will be investigated. Surface sediments at these sites will be generally evaluated in terms of fines content, stability after removal of vegetation in the right-of-way, stability after regrading for service road construction, and the likelihood of slumping, mudflow, or landslide problems. -43- Cc f Co, Literature search amd synthesis will be carried out utilizing all readily available published and unpublished information from Many sources, such as AEIDC's library and other in-house reference collections, the U.S. Geologic Survey, the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and the University of Alaska. A brief field reconnaissance of the Kisaralik River valley and proposed transmission line intertie routes, both in the Kilbuck Mountains and on the Kuskokwim River delta, will be performed. The reconnaissance will be carried out by foot and aircraft, and possibly by boat. The reconnaissance will help relate information derived from the literature search and synthesis with specific site conditions. Soil and sediment samples will be taken from a few locations in order to verify specific properties. Soil stability will be noted for both spring breakup and late summer conditions. Evaluation of Relative Environmental Impacts Objectives: Identify probable environmental impacts of each development alternative considered during the study, and areas where additional data are required during subsequent phases for their full identification and evaluation. Prepare a matrix illustrating the relative impacts of each alternative on each aspect of the environmental characteristics. Scope Plan: Environmental characteristics and engineering alternatives will be integrated throughout the course of the study to ensure the incorporation of environmental values into all stages of the project planning process. Following selection of plan alternatives, impacts for each alternative will be identified in relation to each pertinent environmental consideration and they will be displayed in matrix form for ready identification and presentation to agencies and the public. -44- TASK: ENERGY SUPPLY PLANS Transmission Systems Appraisal: The Single Wire Ground Return (SWGR) System, which has been in operation at Bethel for approximately one year, has been reported upon by the consultant to the Division of Energy and Power Development of the Department of Commerce and Economic Development and is currently unpublished. The SWGR System at Kobuk is of a different design, and construction of that line is presently nearing completion. An appraisal of either of these demonstration projects in this proposal would not be appropriate, in that a member of the project team, Mr. Thomas Humphrey, is under contract to the State of Alaska for the Kobuk line. Objective: The overall objective is to develop a conceptual transmission system design and reliable cost estimate for the hydropower alternative from the Kisaralik powerhouse to Bethel and to develop a conceptual design and reliable cost estimate for a transmission intertie system among the 12 villages and Bethel in the study area. The village intertie system will be based on an analysis of the results of the SWGR demonstration projects to date. Prelim- inary cost evaluations of the bulk power transmission lines for assessing the feasibility of centralized thermal generation near a fuel source (such as a mine-mouth coal plant at Nelson Island) will be made to assist in formulating energy supply plans. Scope Plan: A transmission system development program will be prepared for inclusion in the evaluation of. the alternative generation capacity expansion plans. The alternative transmission system developments will be prepared to meet the requirements of the generation capacity expansion programs, load growth and basic reliability criteria. Intertie Evaluation The available information on the demonstration projects for the Single Wire Ground Return (SWGR) System will be carefully reviewed for the development of a village intertie transmission plans. Technical requirements of the SWGR system will be assessed -45- and analysis of cost experience will be made. Such aspects as unbalanced loadings, neutral insulation requirements, grounding, fault detection and relaying, and voltage regulation will be considered to assure that conceptual design of the SWGR system incorporates. experience gained on the two demonstration projects. Load forecasts will be reviewed to identify any large future or existing loads, industrial or commerical, that may require three phase power. The route selection for village interties in the Reconnaissance Feasibility Report will be examined for feasibility relative to significant cost impact. An evaluation of land status and holdings which might preclude transmission r-o-w access will be made and the routing modified as necessary. The existing generation and distribution systems of each village will be examined to assess substation and interconnect requirements that could significantly effect conceptual design cost. A transmission design engineer with experience in the area of transmission line formulation requirements will visit the site to gain first hand understanding of the permafrost conditions in the tundra and construction conditions. This field information is necessary to assure that cost estimates for transmissions reflect field conditions. A set of reliability criteria will be established for each type of transmission system (bulk power and interties). The transmission conceptual design will be developed to satisfy the reliability criteria. Cost estimates for the intertie system will be developed making use of the analysis of the SWGR demonstration projects and the results of this activity. Energy Plan Evaluation Transmission conceptual designs will be developed for the following alternatives and will include the village interties system conceptual design: 1. "Base Case" based on continuation of present practices in the area. 2. Kisaralik River hydroelectric development. 3. (Transmission system in conjunction with a generation program to meet the forecast of future electric -46- ( requirements, assumed to be a coal-fired central generating station. Cost estimates of the transmission programs will be prepared for use in the economic analysis of the various alternatives. The cost estimates will include the cost of transmission (both three phase and SWGR), substations, circuit breakers, relaying, and bulk power step-down transformers. Each transmission development program will be described in the report, and the description will include a table of development. The table of development will list each transmission circuit and substation addition according to the year in which it is required. Solient technical characteristics, such as conductor size will be listed. Single line diagrams of the recommended transmission plan will also be included. A diagram of the transmission line structure would be included to illustrate the structure type used as a basis for the cost estimate. Plan Formulation Appraisal: No comprehensive energy supply plans have been developed for the Bethel area. Previous studies on the Kisaralik River development have addressed only limited energy supply options (hydroelectric and diesel). The cost estimates used in those analyses appear to be out of line with current cost experienced in Alaska. Most recently, tranmission interties demonstration projects between villages are under study. Waste heat recovery systems are functioning in Unalaska and some will be in Onzinkie. Wind generating units and energy conservation and storage systems are being installed with relatively short payback periods. Recent increases in fuel prices and financial incentives have contributed to these new developments. The study area suffers from limited size of energy market, which results in a high cost of energy with the substantial increase in the cost of fuel oil. Opportunities exist, therefore, to develop an energy plan that will substantially improve the current situation. The previous recommendation of a major hydroelectric project (Kisaralik) deserves serious reconsideration due to its large size in relation to the load, the extreme high unit cost of -47- Co om (Co construction for the size of the project, the negative environmental impact, and the long transmission connections. The hydroelectric project does not appear to be cost effective in resolving the space heating problem. For these reasons, an objective and comprehensive evaluation of all the alternative options will be made. Objective: The objective of this study will be to determine the best alternative electrical energy supply plan(s) for Bethel and twelve communities within the Bethel area, and to assess their feasibility. The selected plan(s) may become the subject of a subsequent detailed feasibility study. Three alternative power plans will be addressed, all of which will be formulated to meet the forecasted electrical energy requirements. First, a "base case" plan will be developed that would likely result from a continuation of present practices in the study area and/or from a reliance on oil-fired generation modes. In addition to the base case plan, two alternative plans will also be formulated to meet the forecasted electrical energy and peak load requirements. The second plan will consist of Kisaralik River Hydroelectric development along with any other facilities or programs. The third plan will consist of another set of projects, facilities and programs to meet the forecasted electrical requirements; this plan will not include Kisaralik development. This plan will be based upon a thorough review and update of alternatives identified in previous reconnaissance studies and upon additional research and investigation of alternatives under this study. In the preparation of the work plan for this proposal, we have assumed that the third plan will rely on.coal as the primary fuel for electric power generation and spacing heating purposes. This assumption will be confirmed at the outset of the study. While meeting electric requirements is the primary focus in the formulation of each alternative plan, consideration is also to be given to meeting space heating or other energy needs, if such a combined approach is determined to be econo- mically viable and if it compliments the provision of elec- -48—- ~ CO C trical energy. The purpose of considering plan outputs other than electrical is to insure that potential economies of cogeneration, coordinated energy resource extraction and transportation, etc. are not overlooked. Only proven and commercially available technologies will be included in the alternative plans. Methodology The three alternative plans are designated as: Alternative No. l - "base case" Alternative No. 2 - "Kisaralik Hydroelectric Project" Alternative No. 3 - "coal or other" In practice, the “base case" plan will be continued for some years before Alternative No. 2 or Alternative No. 3 can be introduced to Bethel. This is due both to the time that is required to implement a major project as well as to possible economic reasons. Alternative No. 2 or 3 must, however, be viewed as the eventual solution of meeting the long term energy supply needs of the study area. Adoption of Alternative No. 2 over 3, or vice versa, results in very different paths of the total energy supply as well as the electrical energy supply solution. We agree it is essential to factor the total energy supply situation, particularly space heating and waste heat recovery systems, to finalize the optimum plan for the electric supply development. The methodology described below represents a systematic and logical approach to determining the optimum plan, and calls for the following major steps: 1. Establishment of criteria and standards that each alternative plan must meet in terms of technical soundness, environmental acceptability, regulating constraints, financing feasibility, and other risks before any plan will be subjected to economic comparison. 2. Formulation of subalternative plans within Alternative No. 1, and comparision of these subalternatives to determine the optimum development plan for Alternative No. l. 3. Formulation of subalternative plans within Alternative No. 2 and comparison of these subalternatives to -49- determine the optimum development plan for Alternative No. 2. 4. Confirmation that coal is the most attractive primary energy source, aS opposed to any other potential energy sources, to be utilized in Alternative No. 3. 5. Formulation of subalternative plans within Alternative No. 3, and comparison of these subalternatives to determine the optimum development plan for Alternative No. 3. 6. Comparison of each of these optimum plans, in terms of technical soundness, environmental acceptability, regulating constraints, financing feasibility, and other risks, leading to the selection of the optimum plan. Criteria and Standards In principle, a complete plan will embrace the energy supply (both electrical and non-electrical) needs of the entire thirteen- village area. The comparisons will be conducted on the basis of a complete electric energy supply plan for the entire study area, and will allow for the benefits and cost of supplying other forms of energy that will be utilized in the area. Each plan will be established to meet electricity forecast demands with allowance for reserve and will meet appropriate reserve criteria. Both peak and energy demands will be met with dependable capacity and firm energy estimates. Electric system stability criteria would also be established and analyzed where they might be a controlling factor in any plan. Each plan will be established for the orderly commissioning of facilities over the forecast period to match electric energy demand growth. Investment, fuel, and operation and maintenance costs will be estimated on a yearly basis. Estimates will be made of net benefits from providing non-electric energy supply that can be utilized by the consumers, and other benefits. The benefits will be treated as a credit in the present worth analysis. The basis of cost, escalation rates for fuel and other items, economic project life, interest rate, discount rate, and treatment of non-electrical benefits will conform with Alaska Power Authority Standard Procedure for Economic Analysis FY1982. .? -50- tL C aN, C Alternative No. 1 Alternative No. 1, representing the "base-case" alternative, will be studied by considering that future load growth will be met by the addition of diesel or oil-fueled steam plants (at Bethel). No new energy supply options will be introduced under this plan. A study will be conducted to determine the timing of interconnection that each village should make with the Bethel system. The factors controlling interconnection include (a) load level of the village, (b) transmission line distance, (c) cost differential of energy supply between that produced at Bethel and at the village. The voltage level, type and cost of transmission (such as SWGR) will be estimated to permit this study. Cost of space heating by small steam plants will be estimated in the study. They will be factored in developing and comparing the cost of total energy supply. Alternative No. 2 Studies for Alternative No. 2, involving the Kisaralik Project, will be directed toward determining the optimum timing of commissioning the Kisaralik Project, the optimum size of the project, and the possible earlier interconnections of the villages. The use of electricity for space heating purposes will also be considered since there is a potential surplus of energy supply with the Kisaralik Project. Prior to the commissioning of the Kisaralik Project, which will have a long lead time, solutions involving low-capital cost generation alternatives will be included to meet load growths. Economic analysis, using the discounted cash flow approach established by Alaska Power Authority, will be conducted to determine the optimum Alternative No. 2 for comparison with the optimum Alternatives No. 1 and 3. Alternative No. 3 Alternative No. 3 will include all energy supply options except Kisaralik. This task will begin with a cost comparison of all energy supply options that have been studied including small diesel, medium-speed diesel, coal-fueled steam, and oil-fueled steam, with and without waste-heat recovery systems, possible -51- c small hydro, and wind and solar energy plants. We will compare the cost of electrical energy delivered at various load centers from the source of generation including transmission costs. This initial comparison will identify these options which are economically attractive, for inclusion in the alternative plans. At this point, an additional screening will also be done to eliminate the alternatives which are not proven in technology, or are environmentally less attractive, and do not possess clear economic advantages. The attractive options will be retained for further analysis. Alternative energy supply plans will be constructed using a combination of these energy supply options. We expect that a large number of alternative plans might result since there are so many energy supply options. If some of the energy supply options are proven to be attractive, more than a single Alternative No. 3 plan will be selected and subjected to further analysis. Construction Cost A detailed construction cost estimate by the contractor's cost method, will be developed for each of the alternative plans. The estimate will be ,based on the cost of plant equipment, civil quantities and unit prices, and include allowances for contingencies and engineering and owner's overhead. The cost estimates will be developed to the same level of confidences for all alternative plans to ensure the validity of comparison of alternatives in the economic analysis. Jacobs Associates, a consulting construction firm, will provide overall review of the construction cost estimates prepared for the studies proposed in this work plan. A senior estimator will travel to Alaska to gather specific data about labor, equipment, transportation, and site related conditions. A Jacobs team of construction engineers will evaluate assumption regarding construction procedure and review unit prices and costs of plants equipment to establish the reasonable- ness and comparability of the construction cost estimates developed for the alternative plans of energy generation proposed. -52- Lee cm aoe i c Co Economic Analysis Alaska Power Authority established detailed standard procedures for economic analysis for fiscal year 1982, as discussed in an earlier section on Standard and Criteria. We are in agreement with the procedure and see no reason to change. The three alternative plans will evolve from an economic analysis of the subalternatives within each basic plan. They will then be analyzed to compare with one another in detail taking full consideration of the standards, criteria, benefits and costs. Estimates of benefits and costs of these options included in the final alternative plans will be checked and refined, so that they represent the best estimate that can reasonably be made at this level of study. Non-energy benefits will be further refined and factored. Other benefits and costs will be quantified as much as possible. A sensitivity analysis will be conducted to determine how some of the factors basic to economic analysis would influence the final selection. This includes changes in load growth rates, interest and discount rates. The ranges of the sensitivity analysis will be predetermined with Alaska Power Authority. The methodology will be selected from the many available to make a rigorous comparison which will reflect the complexity of the plans and relevant technical, environmental and economic issues. The methodology will provide a suitable means of weighing environmental values relative to economic and technical factors. The results of the comparison may be subjected to sensitivity analysis if the preferred plan is not a clear choice. A preferred plan will be recommended for appropriate detailed feasibility studies. Any other results from the study which warrant further assessment will be formulated into a plan of action with appropriate recommendations. -53- TASK: PUBLIC AND AGENCY PARTICIPATION Agency Coordination and Permitting Appraisal o The entire project area is located within the boundaries of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Kisaralik River is being studied for possible inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. This study is being headed by the National Park Service with assistance from the Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Alaska Power Authority, and other federal, state and local agencies. A draft EIS on this proposal is tentatively scheduled for completion in April 1982, but a final decision by the Congress is not likely before 1984. Information on the natural resource values of the Kisaralik River that have led to its inclusion by Congress on the list of rivers to be studied is available from reconnaissance studies conducted by the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and other federal and state agencies. Portions of the project area are within the Bristol Bay Cooperative Region Study Area and the area covered by the Oil and Gas Leasing Program Under Sections 1203 and 1008, respectively of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. Programs and policies of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and other agencies charged with maintenance of the well-being of native people interrelate with power needs and overall project planning. Activities in or otherwise affecting the Kisaralik River or its resources will require a permit from Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G). Objectives: fe} Maintain two way communication with federal, state, and local agencies whose interests and activities directly relate to or affect the proposed Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment. -54—- ° Coordinate proposed project activities with the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge and Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and assist in securing the necessary permits for project activities. ° Assess the potential effects of land status and permitting requirements on the feasibility of alternative plans. Scope Plan: The Project Agency Coordinator will serve as the primary liaison between the project team and federal and state agencies concerned with maintaining a quality environment (e.g., FWS, ADF & G, NPS, etc.). He will assist other project personnel in the preparation of a Special Use Permit from the Fish and Wildlife Service for project activities on the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge and a permit from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for Activities on or off the Refuge that may adversely affect fish or wildlife resources. He will also serve as liaison with the Kisaralik Wild and Scenic River Study Team to ensure that all environmental information available from that study is incorporated into the project planning process. He will assist the Public Participation Coordinator in identifying and incorporating locally-expressed environmental concerns into the project planning process and in presentation of the program at local public meetings. Public Participation Appraisal: Recent studies by Nunam Kitlutsisti reveal that energy costs (electricity, oil and gas) account for approximately 47 percent of total family income for families in a rural village in the Yukon Delta-Lower Kuskokwim region of Alaska. Total energy costs increased by a factor of 2.3 between 1975 and 1980 and the cost of electricity in the same community increased threefold over the same period. These rapidly increasing cash needs of both the rural Alaskan native villages and of the individual village families are resulting in major changes in local living patterns. The traditional subsistance livelihood in which the people lived in harmony with their local resources on an annual cycle is being disrupted. Rather than harvesting food in the summer when it is abundant, the men must work for wages to pay for energy needs and, then, in turn, pay for imported, store-bought food when local supplies are exhausted. -55- Thus, the people of the project area have a major interest in the study from two stand-points. Energy costs need to be reduced, but in a manner that is not detrimental to the other resource values of the area that are also critical to the local, traditional subsistence economy. Objective: To provide both formal and informal means of two way communi- ation and exchange of information between the project planning staff and the residents of the project area. Scope Plan: Nunan Kitlutsisti will represent the villages and two repre- sentatives, one from Bethel and another with regional oversight will be assigned in agreement with APA. These representatives will establish lines of communication with the inhabitants of the study area at the onset of the project. As soon as authorization to proceed is obtained, information outlining the project goals, proposed work program, and opportunities for receipt of public comments will be reviewed and approved by APA. This information will be provided to the three represnetatives and local weekly newspaper. Tundra Drums and KYUK radio and TV Early in the program, field visits will be made to all villages within the sphere of influence of the project to meet with the village leaders. In at least four locations, including Bethel, formal public hearings will be held at which all key project participants will be present. These formal meetings will be organized in cooperation with the APA project manager. Visual aids and hand-outs will be prepared seeking local input to the study. In villages where public hearings are not held, extra efforts will be made to provide opportunities for local inputs. Throughout the course of the study, material updating the progress of the investigation will be provided to the three study area representatives and interested individuals, the villages, the weekly newspaper, radio and TV. As appropriate, these continuing contacts will be made in both English and Yupik Eskimo. Presentations will also be made to other groups from the planning area. Examples of this would be meetings of the Yugtak Corporation, eight Bethel area village corporations that have formed a cooperative business partnership, the Lower Kuskokwim Fish and Game Advisory Committee, the Association of Village Council President's Fisheries Task Force and its Kuskokwim -56- component, and the Kuskokwim Fur Trappers Association. All of these groups have field knowledge of the study area, and the communications exchange will be most helpful to both groups during the course of the project. Towards the end of the study, a second set of formal public meetings will be held. The exact timing of these meetings will be determined following coordination with APA and community leaders. Extensive experience in public relations in the Yukon Delta-Lower Kuskokwim area demonstrates that village meetings in the summer prior to August 15 or in September will be poorly attended, and the necessary informed responses from interested and concerned local citizens will not occur. -57- TASK: FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT Appraisal Information on the alternatives for the development of a regional electric power system for Bethel and surrounding villages is contained in several reports that have been published in the past six years. An interested reader is disadvantaged by the necessity to refer to more than one document to compare and assess the various approaches and levels of study of the regional electric alternatives proposed. Objective Studies required to develop conceptual designs, determine plan costs, select the recommended plan, and identify major environmental obstacles will be documented in a comprehensive and orderly format. Scope Plan The feasibility assessment report and appendices will be prepared to document studies, analyses, and conclusions leading to the determination of the social, environmental, technical, economic, and financial feasibility of the plans for regional electric development. The main report will present conclusions and recommendations for subsequent action; and will describe the recommended plan and establish its physical, social, economic and financial soundness. Appendices will be prepared for the major disciplines: ae Energy Forecast b. Energy Generation Hydroelectric Thermal Other c. Enviromental Studies d. Cost Estimates e. Economics and Finance -58- The appendices will include sufficient information to allow experts in the various disciplines to substantiate the soundness and accuracy of the conclusions and recommendations presented in the main report. The appendices will include descriptions of the methods of investigations and analyses used. One hundred copies of the draft main report and appendices will be presented August 15, 1982. The final Feasibility Assessment Report and Appendices will be delivered September 30, 1982. -59- Man-Hour and Cost Summary The following tables show a summary of man-hours and costs by major task for the firms organized to perform the studies outlined in the Work Plan. Task Energy Use and Demand Thermal and Other Generation Hydropower Generation Environmental and Physical Resources Energy Supply Plans Public and Agency Participation Advisory Group Feasibility Assessment Report TOTAL MAN-HOURS POWER PLAN FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT Study of Gas Alternative Table 1 Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment Man-Hour Allocation Stefano Dames Harding Unassigned & & & Nunam Jacobs Bethel- Harza Assoc. AEIDC Moore Lawson Kitlutsisti Assoc. Region Total 504 460 100 1,064 40 1,117 230 760 60 2,207 2,662 145 2,807 1,006 2,050 3,056 984 340 200 1,524 100 100 340 1,187 530 2,257 430 136 200 62 40 100 35 50 1,053 5,726 2,153 2,820 822 245 1,387 235 580 13,968 386 560 500 353 50 100 50 80 2,079 Task Energy Use and Demand Thermal and Other Generation Hydropower Generation Environmental and Physical Resources Energy Supply Plans Public and Agency Participation Advisory Group Feasibility Assessment Report TOTAL COST POWER PLAN FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT Study of Gas Alternative Bethel Table 2 Total Cost Allocation (in Dollars) Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment Stefano Dames Harding Unassigned & & & Nunam Jacobs Bethel- Harza Assoc. AEIDC Moore Lawson_ Kitlutsisti Assoc. Region Total 29,900 40,000 3,000 72,900 4,000 100,200 10,000 49,300 5,000 168,500 143,500 12,000 155,500 55,800 85,000 140,800 52,200 26,800 17,000 96,000 12,700 12,700 14,000 34,000 32,000 105,400 26,900 10,300 9,000 3,700 3,000 3,000 3,000 (3,000 61,900 325,000 190,000 118,000 53,000 20,000 40,000 20,000 35,000 801,000 30,000 47,000 21,000 22,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 145,000 SCHEDULE A flow chart showing our proposed schedule for carrying out the Work Plan follows. The schedule is organized according to the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) developed by the U.S. Navy. PERT has proven to be an effective method of monitoring work progress. It is designed to be flexible and used as a tool to adjust the schedule as the Work Plan proceeds. The PERT network and schedule will be revised and updated throughout the study as required. In developing the schedule, we have assumed that APA will give notice to proceed with the work on January 1, 1982. The timing of the work is such that field reconnaissance activities will proceed in late May. However, adequate time is available subsequent to the field work to fully incorporate the findings of the reconnaissance. A complete draft Feasibility Assessment Report will be submitted to APA on or before August 15, 1982. After APA review, the final report will be prepared and submitted by September 30, 1982. , / 1982 “BETHEL AREA POWER PLAN. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT 1981 po L DEC JAN FEB ! MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP | i INITIAL ASSESSMENT 0 | ] \ | ENERGY USE COLLECTION OF ie PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE ENERGY FORECAST O AND DEMAND ECONOMIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE AD | ENERGY BASE DATA ae Z Nett 4 7 Sit i ie eZ pea CONSERVATION, WASTE HEAT : / OPTIMIZATION OF STEAM | RECOVERY, COGENERATION de PLANT ALTERNATIVES cost LEGEND cost oF FUEL SLY ee aaa YPE, AVAILABILITY, . THERMAL Q cua dee () () | WORK ACTIVITY AND ———-— DUMMY ACTIVITY OTHER PRELIMINARY SITING & COSTING/ | yo 7 ia7ATION OF DIESEL PLANT ALTERNATIVES : A A D WIND POWER ASSESSMENT ae ee apa, REPORT SUBMISSION ENERGY & COSTING ! BIMONTHLY PROJECT TEAM MEETING a : 2 ge ss 4 WITH APA, COMMUNITY, = 1ON GOVERNMENT AGENCY INPUT GENERAT PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES c eel ter Sen ALTERNATIVE SIZES AND LAYOUTS x OPTIMIZATION OF ALTERNATIVES 4 ESTIMATE i | HYDROPOWER A Gran sie asessuent Sh \ SITE cy CONSTRUCTION Oris? (4 SCHEDULE () HYDROLOGY INVESTIGATION POWER & ENERGY OPERATION STUDIES FEASIBILITY aT a ae cee aa ASSESSMENT T COORDINATION & PERMITTING _ ! | } ASSESS FISHERY RESOURCE AND AQUATIC HABITAT | /->+O- C) : FINAL // ENVIRONMENTAL ! ENVIRONMENTAL fs ASSESS WILDLIFE peas AND HABITAT CY CQ ASSESSMENT _ > | AND Y , AND SITE Z Y ACTIVITIES i PHYSICAL q sess enwnonmenra tees | ~7// | | ASSESS ARCHAEOLOGY/ | ENVIRONMENTAL ' RESOURCES CULTURAL RESOURCES eee eee a ; SITE VISIT | _ = | ASSESS GEOMORPHOLOGIC Hi REVIEW COST | ceca serrate SE Fy cnet | ese rd { CHARACTERISTICS OF THE © ag ESTIMATES eee | | Beet =! ite KISARALIK PROJECT AREA : z PLAN | 4 ESTABLISH PLANNING | ] BASE PLAN { Econ SeAE Ce ENERGY cs CRITERA AND STANDARDS ry FORMULATE BASE PLAN, INCLUDING INTERCONNECTION | OS Z C) O SUPPLY cncbdu ayarclic TIMING OF BETHEL AND VILLAGES / © TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | — PLAN PLANS ! FORMULATE COMPARISON VILLAGE SSS aaa d : sent il THERMAL PLAN & ASSESSMENT REVIEW || INITIAL VILLAGE INFORMATION -\ PROGRAMS Mtgs. | VILLAGE O OD . (1) PUBLIC AND MEETINGS aera AGENCY | | AGENCY i i 1 PARTICIPATION Novice TO. 4 — 4. 4 4—~© © @ Notice TO. @+—_@_@_@—___9—__*'—_92—__-0—_9>—- 6 0— 998 793900 > 7 ror oe PROCEED 1 1 fous TEAM | : ' ' 1 ' 1 I ! 1 } all | ALASKA POWER aman: BETHEL, VILLAGE AND REGION E XV FEASIBILITY a ASSESSMENT REPORT DRAFT ce rr HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS November 19, 1981 Alaska Power Authority 334 West 5th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attention: Mr. Donald W. Baxter Subject: Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment Gentlemen: We are pleased to present our proposal for the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment. We have assembled a group of firms with the professional expertise and knowledge of local conditions that can address the complex technical, environmental, social, and economic issues. Harza Engineering Company will lead the study and will be responsible to the Alaska Power Authority for the successful completion of the study program. The other team members will perform their services under subcontract to Harza. The team members and their major activities are listed below: Harza Engineering Company Hydroelectric project evaluation Energy market forecast Economic evaluation Stefano and Associates, Inc. Thermal energy evaluation with - Mark Newell Wind energy evaluation Thomas Humphreys Transmission to villages Ralph Darbyshire Energy market and economic studies Dames and Moore Fuel resource evaluation Harding and Lawson Subartic geotechnical evaluation Artic Environmental Information and Data Center Environmental studies Nunam Kitlutsisti Village coordination and data collection Jacobs Associates Review of cost estimates After careful review of previous studies and discussions with personnel of the APA, other state and federal agencies, and interested individuals, we have formulated a work plan which will address the many technical, economic, 150 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 TEL. (312) 855-7000 CABLE: HARZENG CHICAGO TELEX 25-3540 Page 2 - Continued November 19, 1981 Alaska Power Authority -and environmental issues to be evaluated. The alternative generation pro- grams will be formulated to serve the future energy requirements of the Bethel area in the most economical and environmentally acceptable way. The team we have assembled can perform a study which will be recognized by local, state, and federal agencies as having objectively addressed all significant issues. The results will provide a clear choice of the options available and will lead to a firm recommendation of the most favorable generation alternative. Each member firm provides expert capabilities to evaluate specific aspects that have been identified as being important. Harza will manage all aspects of the study and will evaluate hydropower alternatives and perform the eco- nomic analyses. Stefano and Associates will be responsible for thermal generation and waste heat recovery and use.. This firm has been actively engaged in planning and design of thermal projects in Alaska since 1957. Stefano and Associates services will incorporate other Alaskan firms for specialized services. These include: Darbyshire and Associates who have recently completed an economic forecast for the Bethel area; Tom Humphreys of Northline Electric Company who is completing a demonstration project for single-wire ground return transmission facilities; and Mark Newell of the Renewable Resources Group who has extensive experience in small wind energy generation systems in Alaska. We will incorporate the experience of Dames & Moore on fuel supply economics. They have recently completed an assessment of coal resources in northwest Alaska. Harding & Lawson will provide expertise in subartic geotechnical evaluation. The Artic Environmental Information and Data Center has excellent experience to provide a reliable evaluation of the environmental impacts to be expected with each of the alternative generation programs. Construction costs will be reviewed by Jacobs. Associates to assure they are prepared on a comparable basis and that they are realistic for the conditions that will be encountered in western Alaska. Jacobs Associates has experience with construction costs for hydropower projects in southeastern Alaska and other Alaskan projects that have been constructed under artic and subartic conditions. Village participation in the study program will be organized and coordinated by Nunam Kitlutsisti. The work plan is organized in six major tasks: Energy Use and Demand Thermal and other Generation Hydropower Generation Environmental and Physical Resources Energy Supply Plans Public and Agency Participation Work on all tasks will begin with authorization to proceed. A flow chart is presented in the proposal that illustrates how the activities will proceed in parallel with coordination of activities and integration of preliminary results. This approach will permit each study group to direct its effort to the final task of developing and comparing the optimum energy supply plan for each generation alternative. The work plan provides a step-by-step procedure to identify, optimize, and evaluate each practical generation alternative to serve the Bethel area. The study will lead to selection of the most favorable alternative considering technical, economic, environmental, and public concerns. The study results will provide a sound basis for a decision to proceed with detailed feasibility study of the most favorable generation source for the Bethel area. cm ‘ CT a Page 3 - Continued November 19, 1981 Aldska Power Authority Harza will provide a Project Manager resident in Anchorage to coordinate and manage the activities of the project team. We will assign Mr. Paul Ford to this key role. Mr. Ford has 12 years experiénce in the management of re- source evaluation and environmental studies. His project management experience includes directing activities of many participating firms in multi-~disciplined studies with complex technical and licensing issues. He has managed studies in coal, nuclear, hydroelectric, and other energy projects. Mr. Ford will be assisted by five technical managers who will direct the major tasks and indi- viduals who will lead the public and agency participation in the study. The technical managers are listed below and discussed in the proposal. The Bethel and regional leaders of public and agency participation will be assigned in agreement with the Alaska Power Authority. Energy Use and Demand Ralph Darbyshire - Stefano & Associates Thermal and other Generation Ralph Stefano - Stefano & Associates Hydropower Generation Villem Tammekivi - Harza Environmental and Physical Resources : William Wilson - AEIDC Energy Supply Plans L. Dow Nichol - Harza In our judgment the type of study that is needed to properly assess the Bethel Area Power Plan requires most of the activities to be done in Alaska. The environmental and resource studies as well as the social and economic evaluations should be made by specialists with detailed knowledge of and experience with the unique conditions in the Bethel area. About 67 per- cent of ‘the total study effort will be done in Alaska, with 58 percent of the work assigned to Alaskan residents. We are confident that the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment will provide a sound basis for selecting the best plan for serving the electric generation requirements of the Bethel area. If you have any questions about our proposal, please contact Mr. Paul Ford or myself. Very truly yours Richard L. Meagher Vice President and Manager Alaska Operations Volume I GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Proposal Letter Table of Contents Informational Statements Narrative Alaska Residents Professional Engineer Registration a) b) c) dq) e) ‘£) g) h) Project Concept Capabilities Experience Geographical Experience Project Manager Project Team Work Plan Schedule Capabilities [. INFORMATIONAL STATEMENTS f Alaska Residents The table below provides information on the estimated man- (? hours of participation by Alaska Residents relative to the total |! professional project team, and estimated expenditures in Alaska - for logistical and other non-professional support: ty Number Man-hours Total Project Team 54 12,750 ( (Professionals) - Alaska Residents 28 7,190* I * It is estimated that an additional 1,170 man-hours will be - performed in Alaska by non-Alaska residents. \ | Total Expended lo Expenditures in Alaska (° Expenditures for Logistical $161,000 $126,000 \ and other Non-professional Support Professional Engineer Registration Harza Engineering Company is authorized to practice the pro- t? fession of engineering in Alaska by the authority of the Commis- sioner of the Department of Commerce and Economic Development, State of Alaska, in accordance with AS 08.48.281. The certificate . of authorization is dated June 27, 1979. } Stefano & Associates, Inc. is authorized to practice the , profession of engineering by the Board of Registration of Archi- | tects, Engineers and Land Surveyors. The certificate of authori- , zation is C-15l. ; Authorization of the other participating firms is summarized as follows: [| AEIDC, University of Alaska - Exempt by Statute — Dames & Moore - Business License No 77-03375 1 Harding & Lawson - Professional Engineering Registration 7 No. C-0121 | - Business License No. BL005789 Nunam Kutlutsisti - Business License No. BL064265 SIC 7392 I | oe DESCRIPTION OF HARZA Harza Engineering Company is a consulting firm that was established in 1920. Its principal office is in Chicago, Illinois. The address and communications numbers are; Harza Engineering Company 150 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 U.S.A. Telephone: (312) 855-7000 Cable Address: HARZENG CHICAGO Telex: 25-3540 Consulting services overseas are provided through the affiliated firms of Harza Engineering Company International, Harza Engineering Company International, S.A., and Harza Overseas Engineering Company. Complete Independence and Ownership Harza is an independent consulting organization directed chiefly by engineers who are complemented by professionals in related fields. It does not have any affiliation, direct or indirect, with construction companies, equipment manufacturers, government agencies or financial institutions. It is Harza's conviction that complete independence is a requisite for service devoted to the client's maximum benefit. Harza is entirely owned by its officers, associates, and professional employees, with the Board of Directors elected from the officer group. Thus, all actions taken by the firm are directed by officers who have a professional responsibility to our clients. All of Harza's owners are full-time employees of the fim. Credit Rating and Assets “Harza has a rating of 3Al with Dun & Bradstreet; this is the highest credit rating on the rating scale established by that firm for companies of Harza's size. In our latest financial statements, the net assets of Harza Engineering Company were $7,970,000, and net assets of all the Harza companies totaled $18,780,000. DESCRIPTION OF HARZA (Continued) Personnel Harza and its affiliates currently employ 768 full-time personnel: 603 in the Chicago office and 165 in some 20 affiliated offices throughout the world. Sixty-five percent of Harza's total personnel are professionals - engineers or specialists in the sciences. Among our technical personnel, 212 have advanced degrees, including 41 with Doctorates. Harza is fully staffed and has in-house capability in the disciplines required for each phase of engineering development. These disciplines include the traditional fields of civil, structural, sanitary, electrical, and mechanical engineering, architecture, agriculture, hydrology, geology, and environmental sciences, and also resource economy, financial and permitting assistance, ecology, forestry, fish and wildlife, and soil conservation. Services Harza's available services include every phase of the development of a project: from reconnaissance, through feasibility investigations, contract documents, design, engineering services during construction, and on to start-up and operation. Harza is diversified, with its primary activity being the development and control of water resources for electrical power, irrigation, flood control, land reclamation, water supply, and pollution abatement. In addition, Harza is actively engaged in fields such as: industrial architecture, agriculture, transportation, telecommunications, underground excavation, roadways, industrial and municipal solid waste disposal, services to the mining industries, and a variety of specialized fields. In-House Computer Facilities Harza makes extensive use of computers in all its operations including engineering, management, and accounting. The in-house facilities include large computers, high speed printers, plotters, remote terminals, and direct connection to time-shared computer systems. Training and Technology Transfer Definite programs for training of our client's technical personnel are available if such programs are requested. During the past decade, Harza has provided training for client's engineers and managers from 20 countries; trainees from six of these countries were hosted in our home office in Chicago. 20. DES 1 September 1981 Harza’s 60 years of experience includes some of the largest hydro projects in the world... Yi» / \ BS argest pu torage project in the world when completed tr nell replacement power plant 1 in 1976 with a capa 5,000,000 to construc gy valued at more than was 31 MW 1OW At 10,000-MW, the Guri Project in Venezuela will be th nd largest hydr ric pi nt V the current expansion phase is completed in 1985 ... as well as some of the smallest CONSIDER THE MANY ADVANTAGES OF HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION ... Hydroelectric generation is the only economical, renewable energy source that has been proven safe and non-polluting. It is the most efficient converter of solar energy presently available, and the only one that can provide this energy when needed. Multiple-Use Benefits The reservoir of a hydroelectric project can provide many benefits that are not possible with other forms of generation, for in- stance ... e Recreation—boating, swimming, fishing Flood control Irrigation Municipal and industrial water supply Low flow augmentation Water quality improvement Fish and wildlife enhancement Economic Benefits Once built, a hydroelectric project is almost completely im- mune to inflationary pressures. The civil works, which are a major factor in overall costs, have a useful life of 100 years or more. The electrical and mechanical equipment is more reliable and ef- ficient than in any other type of generation, and requires less fre- quent replacement. Operation and maintenance, the only costs that are subject to inflation, are a minor fraction of the total cost, and the fuel (water) is free. Balance-of-Trade Benefits In highly industrialized nations, virtually all of the labor, material, and equipment for a hydroelectric project can be of domestic origin. For lesser industrialized countries, approximately 50 per- cent of the project cost can be spent locally—which is not possi- ble with fossil- or nuclear-fueled plants. Today, major petroleum exporting nations are developing their hydroelectric potential in order to save their non-renewable oil for export. Importing nations, on the other hand, are pressing con- struction of hydroelectric projects in order to reduce imports and because water is a national resource which cannot be curtailed by shortages, boycotts, or wars. Power System Benefits With the introduction of very large coal-fired and nuclear plants, hydroelectric generation has become more valuable for daily peaking in most power systems. This has resulted in the raising of existing dams, in larger installations at new hydroelectric plants, in substantial additions of capacity at existing plants, and in the con- struction of large pumped-storage projects. 12 T —1—1— Tt T T TT T 12 TIE qu Hydro Peaking 10} — 410 Pumped - storage Pork J tL. t £ Leper 43 Oil- fired Thermal 8 System Load - 1000 MW 6L ~a Coal-fired Thermal 6 7 Z 5h 5 aL Nuclear 4 3 1 1 oe 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 * Midnight 6 Noon 6 Midnight Hydroelectric and pumped-storage generation are ideal for meeting system peak loads and for replacing oil-fired capacity and energy that would otherwise be required. In the operation of most power systems, hydroelectric genera- tion replaces energy that would otherwise have come from oil- fired sources—now the most expensive increment in the genera- tion mix. For that reason, there is presently a resurgence of in- terest in small hydroelectric plants that were once considered un- economical. Old, outdated plants that would normally have been abandoned are being renovated; existing water supply dams without power are being considered for hydroelectric additions; and smaller undeveloped sites, previously bypassed, are being resurrected. HARZA SERVICES IN HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT INVENTORIES OF RESOURCES Very few countries have a thorough inventory of their hydroelec- tric and multipurpose river development potentials. In the U.S., Harza has carried out inventories of pumped-storage sites and is currently assisting federal agencies in inventories of possible small hydroelectric plants. In foreign countries, such as Panama, El Salvador, Pakistan, Guatemala, Honduras, and the Philippines, Harza has made regional and country-wide surveys of both large and small projects. The inventories serve to identify those rivers and projects which merit further investigation and planning LEGEND > 6 Potential hydro sites ° 25 Kilometers Liiit Scale Resource inventories are an important first step in long-range national or regional planning. Above is a map of potential hydroelectric sites in western Honduras and, at the top of the page, a map of possible pumpea-storage sites in Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Lake juperior REGION 4 Minnesota Towa REGION 5 REGION 1 REGION 7 REGION 6 PACIFIC LEGEND: & Generating Stations [= Storage Dams ———~Drainage Basin Boundary - Scott Falls 14.5 MW High Fall 33 MW McPhail F9fls Lake “Superior 500 400 - Meters 300 F— Elevation 100 F— 200 - Hollingsworth 20 Mw an ,) Upper Falls 64.5 MW Gartshore Falls 20 MW Lake Guijo - El. 430 Guajoyo 40 Zapotillo Paso Del Oso Cerron Grande 80 120 Kilometers 5 de Noviembre t (Guayabo) _ RIVER PLANNING River planning is used by Harza to establish a Master Plan for the ultimate development of a basin and to identify the initial priority project or projects. The Master Plan is usually updated periodical- ly to reflect changes in public needs and in regional economy. Harza has developed Master Plans for 22 river basins in 15 countries. Some of these are now fully constructed, and some are in intermediate or early stages of construction. A list of the rivers studied is given below. River Planning Assignments Bolivia, Rio Grande, 1970 Canada, Michipicoten and Montreal Rivers Colombia, Rio Patia, 1970 Ecuador, Rio Chimbo, 1975 Ecuador and Peru, Puyango-Tumbes Basin, 1976 El Salvador, Rio Lempa, 1947 Honduras, Lake Yojoa-Rio Lindo, 1956 Iceland, Thjorsa and Hvita Rivers, 1960 lran, Karun and Marun Rivers, 1965-67 lraq, Euphrates and Tigris Rivers, 1953 Jordan, Jordan River and eastern tributaries, 1977 Pakistan, Indus River Basin, 1959 : Philippines, Agus and Agno Rivers, 1949-63 Venezuela, Rio Caroni, 1959 Washington, U.S.A., Cowlitz River, 1948 West Virginia, U.S.A., Gauley and Kanawha Rivers, 1977 Harza planned the development of the power resources of the Michipicoten and Montreal Rivers for Great Lakes Power Company in the early 1920's. Design of individual projects and expansions is still in progress. Harza has been involved in the planning and design of hydroelectric projects on the Lempa River in El Salvador since the 1940's. The schematic profile below shows the portions of the river plan that have been completed and those still to be constructed. 1 : | Complete | Proposed | Under Design Honduras - El Salvador Common Reach San Lorenzo 160 200 240 280 oy] l PROJECT PLANNING AND OPTIMIZATION Once a priority project has been selected, itis given more detailed study to determine its size and characteristics, its environmental impacts, and its costs and benefits. Harza has the comprehensive in-house staff for all aspects of project planning, and has carried out over 80 such studies in 23 countries. The four most important elements of a hydroelectric project to be optimized in the planning stage are: 1) reservoir headwater levels, 2) turbine type, 3) turbine size, and 4) total installed capacity—both initial and ultimate. Reservoir Levels For projects that do not have topographic, geologic, or en- vironmental limitations to headwater elevations, Harza uses economic analyses to select initial and ultimate levels. One ex- ample is the studies for the storage reservoir at the Guri Project where the market for generation limited the economic level of the initial stage to well below the ultimate topographic limit. Another example is the run-of-river Yacyreta Projects where reservoir en- croachment on the planned upstream Corpus Project limited the economic level. Turbine Type For: higher heads, the type of turbine is usually well defined— impulse or Francis. At lower heads, there are several types that can be used—propeller, Kaplan, tube, bulb, and rim-generator. Harza has made a number of studies comparing types of turbines, including that for the Robert S. Kerr Project, illustrated here. When the market for generation limits the first stage of a project to a level well below the topographic limit of the site, as with the Guri Project in Venezuela, an economic analysis is used to establish the first stage reservoir level. 500 Alternative Thermal Development 400 Initial Hydro Development El, 263 -- 3.8% Return El. 240 — 6.3% Return El, 215 ~- 8% Return 300 y 200 Present Worth of Multi-stage Project — $ Million 100 0 2 4 & 8 10 12 Annual Rate-of Return — Percent KAPLAN TURBINE Four - 27,5000 kw units Total length of powerhouse: 352 ft. BULB UNIT Six - 18,333 kw units Total length of powerhouse; 394 ft. TUBULAR UNIT Four - 27,000 kw units Total length of powerhouse: 260 ft. Prior to designing the Robert S. Kerr powerhouse for the Corps of Engineers, Harza evaluated three types of units for the project (above). Kaplan units were selected and the project (below) was completed in 1970. Turbine Size The selection of turbine size is only occasionally a matter of economics. Usually, it is based upon system size, available space, flexibility of operation, and other judgemental factors. In the case of very large projects, such as Guri and Yacyreta, the tur- bines are the largest practical sizes in keeping with current technology, transportation limitations, and manufacturing com- petitiveness. 2000 1000 Installed Capacity Initial installed capacities are usually based on_ river characteristics, reservoir regulation, distance to load centers, and the near-term market for base, semi-base, or peaking power. In systems that are predominantly hydroelectric, individual plants usually have initial installations that produce power at about system load factor. In systems with substantial fossil- or nuclear- fueled generation, the initial hydroelectric installation will often be for peaking The most suitable ultimate capacity of a hydroelectric plant is not always readily apparent when the project is planned However, for most projects an ultimate installation of 15 to 25 per- cent dry season capacity factor should be foreseen and provisions for future expansion should be made accordingly y of the spiral case of one of ten Francis turbines to be Powerhouse No. 2 of the Guri Project in Venezuela 1. Vargon 200 2. Albeni Falls Yacyreta 3. Stugun 100 8 4. Saratov = 5. Pickwick 7 aaa 4] 6. Aschach i 58 | 7. Vil. Lenin 2 30 @ Robert s. Kerr 8. Jupia 3 20 € _| 9. Puertas de Hierro e O2 Markland 10. John Day 5 11. Grand Coulee = 10 O1 J 12. ttaipu 3 Francis | 13. Sayano — Sushensk e ° - ee >| 14. Churchill Falls “4 J Kaplan fe * 1 1 | | | eee tte) al ! ! | | 1 3 5 6 10. 12 a) 60 90 150 300 500 Rated Head — Meters of ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS all countries it is now ry thata project be environmentally >ceptable nancing agencies. It is Harza's practice tc specialists participate in project development from the initiation of planning. As aresult, these specialists are able to affect engineer ing solutions and mitigations, and achieve a rational compromise between multiple uses of the resource. This was done with great nefit at the Kootenai Project shown here For s planning pt 4¢ i ect site selection, an environmental ass tis carried ted States, these t Statement and FERC) license ycumentation for all ( Jetermine environmenta bility. In the studies are followed by an Environmental Imr the federal Energy Regulatory Commiss application. Harza provides studies and these requirer well as expert witness estimony before regulating a ies Se © £ y y a —_ Li Gatlory & Surge Chamber > os . a al Pel iio VE FoF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS tric project or addition to an existing plant re quires an economic analysis as part of project planning. Harza always maintained an awareness of the changing criteria and procedures for such analyses as required by the international and domestic regulatory and financing agencies. Economic analyses entail a realistic cost estimate of the proposed project, a projec tion for ten years or more of the power and energy needs of the in terconnected electrica valuation of the type and cost f alterne of generation, and finally ac y new hydro system, an € ve source yMparison of the hydroelectric pro Hydroelectric Cost Estimates The international character of Harza’s hydroelectric work re quires the acquisition and maintenance of up-to-date information on the cost and availability of labor, materials, and equipment in all ts of the world. This informatior the r st es the st eS ates are importan sroject develo t only in the nent, but als¢ ing and t stage asibility-level ear studies Harza has ully estimated the costs of both large and small hydroelectric projects in areas ranging from the populous eastern United States to remote regions of Africa and Asia. In most cases the final construction costs, adjusted for inflation have been equal tc r less than the Intake ‘a eee eae 300 200 1947 Forecast 30 20}— The 5 de Noviembre power plant was the first major project in El Salvador's CEL system and the first underground power plant in Western Hemisphere. The initial 30-MW installation was comp! 1954 1958 Forecast 1965 Forecast 1976 Forecast Actual Load Growth 1960 Forecast 68 Harza has made periodic load growth projections for the CEL system in EI Salvador since 1947. A compilation of these projections and the actual load growth is shown above. Power and Energy Projections For clients that do not make their own projections of future power demands, Harza provides the necessary survey and analysis ser- vices. Several techniques are used, including specific load forecasts, trend analyses by. classes of customers, and com- parison with per capita growth in other regions or countries having similar economic and social characteristics. Since 1947, Harza has made major updated power and energy projections in El Salvador of about 5-year intervals. Adjusted special purpose pro- jections have been made annually. A comparison of the major projections and the actual load growth is shown here Alternative Sources of Generation It is customary in hydroelectric evaluations to formulate an alter- native expansion program using the most likely types and sizes of non-hydroelectric generation. These many include fossil-fueled, geothermal, and nuclear plants. Harza maintains up-to-date per- formance, reliability, and cost information on all of these various types of generating plants Cost Comparisons For many years, the international financing agencies, and more recently the FERC and other federal agencies, have used life- cycle (equalized discount rate, internal rate of return) procedures in cost comparisons of a hydroelectric project and its alternatives Harza has made over 70 such comparative analyses in over 20 countries. These comparisons are frequently supplemented with sensitivity analyses to show the relative effects of variations in Capital costs and fuel prices FERC LICENSING Non-federal hydroelectric projects in the U.S. require licenses from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (formerly the Federal Power Commission). In recent years opponents have fre- quently intervened in the licensing procedure, forcing prolonged Official hearings and criti scrutiny of th vironmental, cost safety, and other elements of the proposed project. Since World War II, Harza has been the consultant on 29 applications for FERC licenses, and has furnished professional witnesses in 16 hearings PROJECT FINANCING Financing arrangements vary with each pr¢ and overseas. Financial analyses prep Harza cor the special requirements of the spec ancing institutions Over the past 30 years, these have included 60 projects and eight different financing sources. The aggregate f this financ- ing is over $1.5 billion. The internationa 1 involved in financing these projects include AlD—Agency for International Development IBRD—International Bank for Reconstruction and Development d Bank) DLF—Development Lc Fund EX-IM—Export Import Bank |CA—lInternational Cooperation Administration |DB—Interamerican Development Bank |DA—International Development Assoc ct, both in the U.S POWER PLANT DESIGN Hydroelectric projects can be of many types and sizes. Although the most appropriate and optimum installation is usually selected during project planning, the consulting firm should have design experience in all types, sizes, and functions. Harza has this full range of experience CONVENTIONAL ABOVE-GROUND POWER PLANTS More than half of the power plants designed by Harza have been the conventional above-ground type. These are sited at the foot of concrete or fill dams, or at the end of tunnels and penstocks. Since 1945, Harza has designed 25 power plants of this type, with heads ranging from 21 to 550 meters. The Rio Lindo Project in Honduras was recently expanded from 40 MW to 80 MW. Guri Powerhouse No. 2, Venezuela, 7,000 MW 0 32 64 Feet Scale {i41tiiit 0 10 20 Meters Hrauneyjafoss, Iceland, 210 MW { x | Mayfield, Washington, 40.5 MW Karun River Project, Iran, 1,000 MW Cerron Grande, E! Salvador, 135 MW 10 2r plant, Washington. Grande, El Sa Burfell power plant, Iceland. Interior and exterior views. 11 Arch dam and powerhouse of the Mossyrock Project, Washington type powerhous ty CONVENTIONAL POWER PLANTS (CONTD.) by 0 32 64 Feet ~ Scale pet QO 10 20 Meters Lower Falls, oy Canada, 38.7 MW Finchaa, Ethiopia, 100 MW Burfell, Iceland, 105 MW Guri Powerhouse, No. 1, Venezuela, 3,000 MW w Karadj, Iran, 80 MW - Mossyrock, Washington, 300 MW . Canaveral, Honduras, 28.5 MW Hollingsworth Falls, Canada, 20 MW Gartshore Falls, Canada, 20 MW Panchet Hill, India, 40 MW — + 00, A, 00. 1 Upper Falls, Canada, ; 64.5 Mw Blakely Mountain, Arkansas, 75 MW High Falls, Canada, 33 MW Rincon del Bonete, Uruguay, 120-MW INTEGRAL INTAKE POWER PLANTS For this type of power plant, which combines the intake and powerhouse in a single structure, Harza has prepared some 10 designs since 1945. The largest of these, both in terms of physical size of units and installed capacity, is the 2700-MW Yacyreta Pro- ject. Foundations for integral intake power plants have ranged from hard rock to alluvium and deep sand oO 32 64 Feet Scale 4 oO 10 20 Meters Markland, Indiana, 64.8 MW Yacyreta, Argentina-Paraguay, 2,700 MW San Lorenzo, El Salvador, 180 MW Petenwell, Wisconsin, 20 MW. Wanapum, Washington, 831.3 MW = Gavins Point, South Dakota, 100 MW Box Canyon, Washington, 67 MW Priest Rapids, Washington, 788.5 MW 14 UNDERGROUND POWER PLANTS Some sites or climatic conditions favor underground power plants. Although originally pioneered in the hard rocks of Norway and Sweden, Harza has adapted this type to other conditions, in- cluding sites with soft rock and with tropical geology. Since 1945 five underground power plants have been constructed to Harza designs while others have been planned and are awaiting authorization to proceed. At many sites, underground stations have been studied as alternatives to surface structures. Drawings of the completed power plants are shown here Guatape, Colombia, 264 MW oO 32 «64 96 128 Feet Scale fyb fag Oo 10 20 30 40 Meters Lower Tachien, Taiwan, 180 MW Ambuklao, Philippines, 75 MW 5 de Noviembre, El Salvador, 66.4 MW Maithon, India, 60 MW SMALL POWER PLANTS— 15 MW OR LESS By today’s standards, many older power plants are small. The pre- sent high costs (and projected increases) of petroleum fuels has caused even the large electric utilities to reexamine small hydro potentials. Harza’s past experience in the design of small plants is now being applied to new projects adapted to modern equipment and technology. Harza is presently engaged in or has recently completed the planning or design of 11 hydroelectric plants of less than 15-MW. Examples of small plants designed by Harza since 1945 are shown here ys in the Kentucky River, th vo-MW 7 on hollow piers, power plant at Lock and Dam Ni which also house the connecting turbine shatts oO 32 64 Feet | Scale } 41141} oO 10 20 Meters La Yeguada, Panama, 6 MW Boulder Creek, Utah, 4.2 MW Guajoyo, El Salvador, 15 MW Hogg Station, Canada, 15 MW McPhail Falls, Canada, 10 MW Strawberry Creek, Wyoming, 1.5 MW Scott Falls, Canada, 14.5 MW Castle Rock, Wisconsin, 15 MW / ic plants in the American Electric Power system (including the Elkhart Project shown here) were studied for possible upgrading. The semi-out oor Guajoyo power plant in El S. The 4.2-MW Boulder Creek Project in Utah. Head: 427 meters. . ea The six-MW La Yeguada Project, Panama ie Interior of the 15-MW Guajoyo Powerhouse, El Salvador. The 14.5-MW Scott Falls Project, Canada The original Cornell power plant (above) was constructed in 1912. Harza designed a modern 30-MW replacement project with horizontal, tube- type units that utilized some of the original substructure concrete (drawing at right). The new powerhouse (below) was exceptionally economical in that the operating features were kept as simple as possible. For = instance, the units are controlled entirely by the intake gates and have no governors, wicket gates, or adjustable blades. SUB-SEA LEVEL POWER PLANTS A few basins below sea level, and relatively near oceans or seas, have long been considered for hydroelectric development. One early plan envisioned diversion of Mediterranean waters to the Dead Sea (400 meters below sea level) Harza is presently studying a similar plan and making preliminary designs for diversions from the Red Sea to the Dead Sea. Another such plan calls for diversion from the Mediterranean Generator RENOVATED POWER PLANTS The renovation of old power plants containing out-dated equip- ment is a special challenge to the designer. Maximum use of the existing structure must be combined with the modified structure necessary to accommodate modern and efficient turbines and generators. A prime example of Harza’s ingenuity in renovation is the Cornell Project shown here Old Intake Piers Removed Turbine Runner Concrete Fill to the Qattara Depression in Egypt, a project on which Harza is providing environmental investigations and assessments TIDAL POWER PLANTS The only operating tidal power plants are in France and the USSR Other countries have and are studying their tidal energy poten- tials. Harza has kept abreast of tidal power engineering through its association with the Bay of Fundy Development in Canada, a site with one of the highest tidal fluctuations in the world PUMPED-STORAGE POWER PLANTS Although adopted earlier in Europe, it was not until the 1950's that the size of principal power systems and their generating sources could accept a large pumped-storage project. In Europe and the U.S., this development has created a renewal in the need for con- sulting firms with experience in the design of large hydroelectric projects Harza has had a substantial role in pumped-storage design in the United States. The 380-MW Seneca Project is in operation, the 2100-MW Bath County Project is under construction, and some seven projects aggregating 12,924 MW have been studied recently or are in preliminary design stages An underground concept of pumped-storage, which depends upon a mined or excavated cavern for its lower reservoir, has been supported by Harza since 1958. At present, the company is engaged in the study of an underground pumped-storage project with a depth of as much as 2200 meters and a capacity of up to 4500 MW The Seneca power plant contains two pumping-generating units and a smaller conventional generating unit that is used for synchronous pumping starts of the other units. Water is pumped from the upstream Allegheny Reservoir and one of the pumping-generating u can discharge generating flows to either the reservoir or to the river downstream through a unique divided draft tube. The farthest advanced of Harza’s studies of underground pumped- storage involves planning for a 3,000- to 3,300-MW project in northern Illinois for Commonwealth Edison Company. Geologic investigations are in progress and studies have been undertaken to optimize the project elements. One possible configuration, illustrated below, would have one or two upper reservoirs, two high-head shafts serving eight pumping- generating units, and a lower reservoir made up of parallel caverns approximately 15 meters wide by 30 meters high. The head will be about 1,500 meters. Upper Intake Upper Reservoir Dike Personnel Access Shaft —,_ Equipment Access Shaft High-Head Shafts (2) Concrete Lined 17 Powerstation 8 Units, 375 MW each \ I Steel Liner Penstocks 20 This general view of power plant construction at the 2,100-MW Bath County Pumped-Storage Project, Virginia, was taken from the lower reservoir area. The upper reservoir will be in a valley behind the ridge at the top of the picture. /t will provide a head of 365 meters and enough storage capacity for 11 hours of peaking generation. Air Vent = dL xX i] ma oo T Air Vent Manifold Connecting Tunnel Lower Reservoir Multiple Tunnels. we uu “ Te Multiple _—» Lower Intakes Draft Tube ~— Draft Tube Manifold Tunnel Gate Gallery . a The Seneca Pumpeda-Storage Project o Allegheny River Pennsylvania, has an average peaking capacity of more than 380 MW The upper reservoir is asphalt lined and has a capacity of 6,730 acre feet. The Bath County power plant, shown under constru' equipped with six 350-MW reversible pumping-generating units. In addition to current resident engineering services, Hé has provided complete environmental, license application, and design services for the project. n, will be eer er Ww = a 21 POWER PLANT CONTROLS Modern power piants are usually automated to optimize operating efficiency. Computer-based control and monitoring systems have been designed by Harza to carry out such functions as automatic generation control, unit or plant control, and dispatch. Harza is in the forefront of this technology having designed plant and multi- plant control systems that are complete with the necessary com- munication facilities. Advanced control systems recently put into operation or under construction include: Power plant control: Cerron Grande and San Lorenzo Projects, El Salvador Guri Project, Venezuela Bath County Pumped-Storage Project, Virginia . CEL System Operating Center, El Salvador System Integration: POWER.PLANT CONSTRUCTION For the implementation of a hydroelectric project, engineering services are needed throughout the construction period, from preparation of specifications to final record drawings. Harza has performed this full range of services on 38 completed projects in 14 countries, and is presently doing so on eight projects now un- der construction. Specifications and Bidding The initial step to construction is the preparation of specifications and preliminary design drawings that will allow for competitive bidding (tendering) on civil works and equipment. To permit the broadest possible competition in bidding, specifications must recognize the accepted international and ma- jor national standards of the industrialized world as well as the standards of the client nation. As evidence of this experience, Harza has recently been identified with civil works or equipment contracts from 30 nations. Specifications and bidding drawings are often bilingual, with English as the most frequent common language. Because of Har- za’s heavy involvement in Latin America, the company has both Compspec terminals and computer storage for specifications in the Spanish language. Since 1945, Harza has prepared over Generator assembly at the Priest Rapids Project. Harza provides both shop and field inspection services for all major equipment. towel Sa en = <4 Control Room, Wanapum Project, Washington. In addition to individual power plant control systems, Harza also designs national and regional dispatch, communications, and system monitoring facilities. 10,000 bidding and detailed construction drawings with English- Spanish notations and legends. Harza provides its clients with assistance in determining the qualifications of bidders, evaluation of bids, and the financial, con- tractual, and technica! aspects of the award of contracts. Detailed Construction Drawings Harza provides full service for the preparation of all detailed con- struction drawings or for the review of such drawings prepared by the construction contractor. Manufacturers Prints and Inspection Normally, equipment manufacturers prepare their own detailed design and fabrication drawings. Harza is accustomed to review prints of those drawings for conformance to the specifications and to project space limitations. Inspections at the site of manufacturing during critical periods of fabrication and testing are also a Harza service. Spiral case concreting in the Markland Powerhouse, 1966. 22 Site Engineering and Construction Management For at-site inspection and construction surveillance, Harza provides key personnel to supplement the client's staff, or, if desired, the entire field engineering force. Responsibilities under- taken by Harza can include quality and dimensional inspection, quality assurance, progress measurements and certification, equipment performance testing, and final acceptance certifica- tion Construction management services are also offered by Harza In addition to the surveillance and quality control functions men- tioned above, construction management services include detailed construction scheduling, project information and control systems, capital budgets and cash flow projections, construction site layout, procurement and expediting of equipment and materials, administration of prime contracts, reporting of daily construction activities, approval of contractor's progress payments, and issuance of final certification Whichever level of service is provided, Harza is experienced in preparing progress reports as required by financing institutions and in the evaluation and negotiation of claims by contractors or suppliers. In the latter case, claims have very rarely reached litigation, and the negotiated settlements are usually a fraction of the original claim Record Drawings and Final Reports To document the project as completed, Harza prepares record drawings, which incorporate all changes made during construc- tion, and a final report which describes with photographs the various stages of construction. These documents are very valuable for future safety inspections and for future expansions of the project Penstock assembly, Guri Powerhouse No. 2, Venezuela, 1979. POWER PLANT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE A hydroelectric project, once constructed, needs proper opera- tion and maintenance to be fully successful. The design and con- struction engineer is best qualified to establish the necessary standards and procedures. This again is a service that is fre- quently provided by Harza Operation and Maintenance Manuals Major manufacturers provide maintenance manuals for their specific piece of equipment. These must be supplemented by the design engineer for subsequent operation and maintenance of the power plant system. Harza has prepared such manuals for many of its hydroelectric projects Training Harza encourages its clients to assign some of their key operating personnel to the project design groups and to the on-site inspec- tion team in order to better their understanding of the power plant equipment. Also, Harza gives training lectures and arranges for on-the-job training at operating projects similar to the one under construction Safety Inspections For the past ten years, the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Com- mission has required a five-year interval safety inspection of all licensed projects. Harza has made 30 such FERC inspections Other state and federal agencies have recently adopted similar regulations, and some foreign governments are following suit Harza has carried out 50 inspections of hydroelectric projects other than those licensed by FERC pids Project. r’s drawings for Gantry crane with intake wheel gate. Harza prepares specifications and 1 all such specialized equipment. PRS n place, Pr ws Manu. 23 HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS DESIGNED BY HARZA SINCE 1946 PROJECT NAME Yacyreta Uribante-Doradas Guri-Powerhouse No. 2 Bath County Pumped-Storage San Lorenzo EI Nispero Hrauneyjafoss Mayfield Ex- Pansion Smith Mountain Pumped-Storage Unit 3 Cerron Grande Rio Lindo Karun River Guri-Powerhouse * No. 1 Cornell Andrews (Lower Falls) Finchaa Robert S. Kerr Guatape Lower Tachien Burfell Seneca: Pump- Turbines Conventional Unit Mossyrock Angat: Main Plant Auxiliary Plant La Yeguada Markland LOCATION Parana River, Argentina-Paraguay Andes Mountains, Venezuela Caroni River, Venezuela Back Creek, Virginia Lempa River, El Salvador Palaja River, Honduras Tungnaa River, Iceland Cowlitz River, Washington Roanoke River, Virginia Lempa River, El Salvador Rio Lindo, Honduras Karun River, Iran Caroni R., Venezuela Chippewa River, Wisconsin Montreal River, Canada Finchaa River, Ethiopia Arkansas River, Oklahoma Nare River, Colombia Tachia River, Taiwan Thjorsa River, !celand Allegheny River, Pennsylvania Cowlitz River, Washington Angat River, Philippines San Juan River, Panama Ohio River, Indiana OWNER Entidad Binacional Yacyreta C. A. de Administracion y Fomento Electrico CVG - Electrificacion del Caroni, C. A. Virginia Electric & Power Company Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Landsvirkjun City of Tacoma, Washington Appalachian Power Co. Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Ministry of Energy CVG - Electrificacion del Caroni,C. A. Northern States Power Co. Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. Ethiopian Electric Light & Power Co, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Empresa Publicas de Medellin Taiwan Power Company Landsvirkjun The Cleveland Electric IIluminating Company and Pennsylvania Electric Co. City of Tacoma, Washington National Power Corporation Instituto de Recursos Hidraulicos y Electrificacion Public Service Company of Indiana INITIAL OPERATION 1987 1983 1985 1982 1982 1981 1981 1980 1979 1977 1971-78 1977 1968 - 77 1976 1938 - 75 1973 1970 1970 1970 1969 1969 1968 1967 1967 1967 CAPACITY NO. OF (mw) UNITS 2700.0 20 300.0 2 7000.0 10. 21 00.0 6 180.0 2 22.5 1 210.0 ° 3 40.5 1 104.0 1 135.0 2 80.0 4 1000.0 4 2800.0 10 30.8 4 38.7 3 100.0 3 110.0 4 264.0 4 180.0 2 105.0 3 350.0 2 30.0 1 300.0 2 200.0 4 12.0 2 6.0 2 64.8 3 RATED HEAD (Meters) (Feet) 20 65 353-1160 146 480 365 1200 31 100 155 508 85 279 53 175 517 57 187 373-1224 160 525 92-146 302-480 12 40 _ 54 177 : 550 1805 ; 13 43 805 2641 275 902 115 377 ; 197 646 232 761 95 312 135 443 102 335 ot 273 896 1 10 33 id HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS DESIGNED BY HARZA SINCE 1946 PROJECT NAME 5 de Noviembre Sam Rayburn Brokopondo Hogg Generating Station Guajoyo Canaveral Wanapum Karadj Hartwell Priest Rapids Hollingsworth Falls Panchet Hill Gartshore Falls Maithon Boulder Creek Gavins Point Upper Falls Ambuklao Box Canyon Blakely Mountain McPhail Falls Scott Falls Strawberry Creek Castle Rock High Falls Petenwell Rincon del Bonete LOCATION Lempa River, El Salvador Angelina River, Texas Suriname River, Suriname Montreal River, Canada Desague River, El Salvador Rio Lindo, Honduras Columbia River, Washington Karadj River, Iran Savannah River, Georgia Columbia River, Washington Michipicoten River, Canada Damodar River, India Montreal River, — Canada Barakar River, India Boulder Creek, Utah Missouri River, South Dakota Montreal River, Canada Agno River, Philippines National Power Corp. Pend Oreille River, Washington Ouachita River, Arkansas Michipicoten River, Canada Michipicoten River, Canada Strawberry Creek, Wyoming Wisconsin River, Wisconsin Michipicoten River, Canada Wisconsin River, Wisconsin Rio Negro, Uruguay INITIAL OWNER OPERATION Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1954-66 electrica del Rio Lemipa U.S. Army Corps of 1965 Engineers Aluminum Co. of America 1965 Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1965 Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1964 electrica del Rio Lempa Empresa Nacional de Energia 1964 Electrica Public Utility District No. 2 1963 of Grant County Karadj Water & Power Authority 1962 U.S. Army Corps of 1962 Engineers Public Utility District No. 2 1959 of Grant County Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1959 Damodar Valley Corp. 1959 Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1958 Damodar Valley Corp. 1958 Garkane Power Assn. © 1958 U.S. Army Corps of 1957 Engineers Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1936-56 “1955 Public Utility District of 1955 Pend Oreille County U.S. Army Corps of 1955 Engineers Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1954 Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1953 Lower Valley Power & Light Co. 1950 Wisconsin River Power Co. 1950 Great Lakes Power Co., Ltd. 1930-50 Wisconsin River Power Co. 1949 Government of Uruguay 1946 CAPACITY NO.OF (mw) UNITS 66.4 5 52.0 2 180.0 6 15.0 1 15.0 1 , 28.5 2 831.3 10 80.0 2 264.0 4 788.5 10 20.0 1 40.0 1 20.0 1 60.0 3 4.2 3 100.0 3 64.5 3 75.0 3 67.0 4 75.0 2 10.0 2 14.5 2 1.5 3 15.0 5 33.0 3 20.0 4 120.0 4 RATED HEAD (Meters) (Feet) 49 160 19. 62 41 135 23 75 42 138 145 476 24 80 147 482 52 170 24 80 34 112 25 82 34 112 39 128 427 1400 15 49 72 236 154 505 13 43 51 167 15 49 21 70 137 450 7 30 45 148 13 43 21 70 Consulting engineers for... ENERGY... Generation— aN eel rei ea elem ot Cole-le mer uim Lila AOU Ue eel eel ear) Thermal Plant Cooling Systems aed CRS CUE ale Energy and Mineral Resources 1 | eee Irrigation and Drainage eMart) Soil Conservation and Erosion Control Agricultural Economics Tunnels and Underground Structures Bie ac lice) Pee CRUE Lrle (ut WATER... Dams « Dikes * Control Structures Regional and River Basin Planning Water Quality Management Flood Control and Drainage WEL Cal eh ale Mier Uuule Wastewater Collection and Treatment HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY 150 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IIlinois 60606 + Tel. (312) 855-7000 Cable: HARZENG CHICAGO - Telex 25-3540 Pee ees ee yi a Se oe Se) Experience WANAPUM PROJECT Client: Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington Location: Columbia River, Washington Purpose: Power, flood control, future navigation Completed: 1963 The embankment dams of the Wanapum Project have a combined crest length of 5,750 ft, a maximum height of 170 ft, and contain 4,670,000 cu yds of fill. The design included an impervious central core with nine-ft-wide transition zones on either side and outer shells containing sand, gravel, and rock from excavations for other project structures. The embankments are founded on a layer of alluvium (coarse river gravels) up to 100 ft thick. The rolled im- pervious core continues through these gravels to just above the groundwater table, where it joins a slurry trench that carries the cutoff down another 80 ft or to bedrock. Where the cutoff did not reach bedrock, three rows of close-spaced grout holes were used to grout the intervening gravels. Using sleeve-pipe methods, with packers to control the placement of measured amounts of grout, it was possible to complete the cutoff with a minimum amount of grout. The slurry trench method of constructing the major part of the cutoff was selected after extensive field tests proved it to be effective and considerably less costly than other methods con- sidered 2—Fill Dams Normal max. HW EI.570 Riprap Rock line The slurry trench under the embankments (above and right) was excavated by dragline through a bentonite slurry (which stabilized the walls of the trench during excavation) then backfilled with an impervious mixture of bentonite, fine soil, and sandy gravel. A three-ft-thick concrete pad seals the rock surface where the trench reached bedrock. The 12 radial gates of the Wanapum spillway are 50 ft wide by 65 ft high, the largest ever fabricated at the time. Harza carried out a series of design and model studies to devise an economical means of transmitting the large water loads (7,560 kips) from the gate trunnions to the concrete piers. The result was a heavily reinforced anchor block with post-tensioned cables extending upstream through the body of the pier. (See photo below.) There are 14 cables in each pier (8 in each end pier) and there are 90 parallel %-in high-strength steel wires in each cable. The 14 cables were stressed to 8,900 kips, 60% of the guaranteed ultimate strength of the materials. This design, which received an award from the Prestressed Concrete Institute in 1964, was found to be more economical and easier to fabricate than the conventional welded-girder support system. Grout connection 2” © sleeve Concrete cap grout pipe at bottom of slurry trench Double packers Groups of four}-| holes 12” o.c. i— 5” @ drill hole Rubber sleeve over holes Pervious overburden Annular grout Rock line Overburden grouting sequence used at Wanapum: 1. Five-inch grout hole drilled and cased. 2. Two-inch perforated grout pipe inserted and casing withdrawn as annular space was filled with grout. 3. Packers placed above and below holes at level to be grouted. 4. Water injected at pressures of 200 to 900 psi to rupture annular grout. 5. Grout injected at pressures ranging from 50 to 450 psi. 6. Packers moved to next level of holes and the process repeated. The specially prepared sleeve grout pipe was perforated with groups of four 3/8-inch holes at 12-inch intervals. Each group of holes was covered with a rubber sleeve to prevent annular grout from flowing into the pipe and also to act as check valves during overburden grouting. The rubber sleeve expanded under grouting pressure, allowing grout to flow out, and resealed the holes when the pressure was relieved. Grout holes were drilled in three rows, three ft. apart. The upstream row was grouted first and these holes took the full computed quantity of grout; the downstream row was grouted next and the grout take was less. The center row accepted very little grout. Fill Dams—3 Client: CVG-Electrificacion del Caroni C.A. (CVG-EDELCA) Location: Caroni River, Venezuela Purpose: Hydroelectric power Scheduled completion: 1987 Guri Dam was designed to be raised in two stages after completion of the initial project. However, increased power demand and the high value of alternative fuels have favored the decision to expand the project in one continuous operation. This raising of the dam by 52 mwill not only require large scale additions to the concrete structures, but will also necessitate major new fill dams to connect the concrete structures to higher ground. The new embankments will have a maximum height of 110 m and a combined crest length of about 10 km. Where they join the concrete structures, the embankments will be of rockfill and im- pervious core construction to permit steeper side slopes and thus reduce the size of the retaining structures. After a gradual transi- tion to flatter slopes, more economical earthfill construction will be used for the balance of the 50 million cu m of fill. The granitic gneiss rockfill will be obtained from excavation for the structures and from quarries. The core and earthfill materials will be sandy silt or clayey silt of decomposed gneiss from nearby borrow areas. A core trench to groutable hard weathered rock and a grout cur- tain will prevent excessive seepage through the fractured quartzite and gneiss bedrock. In designing the Guri embankments, computer technology was used extensively for both conventional soil mechanics studies Switchyard Concrete and finite element analyses. Principal studies, and the computer programs used, included static and pseudo-static slope stability analyses (Wright, Morgenstern-Price, and SLOPE programs); studies of internal seepage and core cracking potential (FPM500, UNSAT and DAMSEP programs, utilizing soil linear elasticity and permeability properties); and studies of interaction between the embankments and concrete retaining structures (ISBILD; SHAKE, QUAD4, and LUSH programs— including non-linear stress-strain relationships, soil dynamic properties, and rock motion data). Advanced soil testing procedures were used to define the dynamic properties and soil strength of the borrow material to be used in constructing the impervious core of the Guri embank- ments. The values obtained became the basis for a finite element analysis of the response of the embankments to seismic shaking. Samples of the material to be used in each dam were sub- jected to three tests: 1) resonant column tests, 2) cyclic triaxial properties tests, and 3) cyclic strength tests. The resonant column test determined the dynamic properties at low strain amplitudes as well as the intrinsic material properties. The cyclic triaxial test determined the dynamic properties at high strain amplitudes and the response properties during and after earthquake loading. The cyclic strength test gave post-earthquake soil strength values for analyzing the stability of the embankments. The effects of the degree of compaction, molding water content, and initial aniso- tropic stress distribution on the test results were also investigated. The tests were carried out (with Harza participation) at the University of Illinois, Chicago Circle Campus, under the direction of Dr. Marshall L. Silver. we op gravity dam Powerhouses Spillway 4—Fill Dams Right embankment ETN Finite element mesh, above, used in earthquake studies for the Guri embankments. Frictionless Air pressure xLoad cell \ / piston MTS console unit 0 X-Y recorder 5 Vert. Load yey. NAA Y {Vert | Strip chart unit frame Triaxial testing Diagram of equipment used in dynamic properties tests. Cyclic strength tests were performed on the equipment pictured above. The rockfill embankment of the initial Guri Dam included an impervious blanket that extended upstream from the core of the dam to cover weathered rock in the right abutment. (At left in photo below.) Fill Dams—5 Client: Aluminum Company of America Location: Suriname River, Suriname Purpose: Power for aluminum production Completed: 1965 Afobaka Dam, a part of the Brokopondo Development, has a total length of about 6,500 ft and a maximum height of nearly 180 ft. Earthfill embankments tie into concrete gravity sections at either end of the powerhouse and spillway, which are located in the original river channel. Sixteen homogeneous fill dikes along the reservoir rim have a total length of almost four miles. A broad outcrop of rock (amphibolite) in the riverbed proved to be of sufficient quality to serve as a foundation for the concrete structures, and by locating the axis of the dam on the upstream side of the outcrop, it was possible to quarry the downstream portion for riprap, rock fill, filter material, and concrete aggregate. Other materials available for construction of the embankments were residual soils for impervious fill and fine sand for shell con- struction. Test fills of both the impervious and pervious materials led to a design that consisted of compacted fine-to-medium-grained sand in the downstream section and a relatively thin sloping core of impervious material on the upstream side. The core, which contains 38% clay-size particles, was compacted by grid roller. The sand fill was placed in 12-in layers and compacted with four passes of a smooth vibrating roller. Filter materials were manu- factured from quarried rock, and the gradation was adjusted in the field to meet design criteria. Conventional riprap protects the 6—Fill Dams upstream slope of the dam and crushed filter rock the down- stream slope. Outside of the river channel tne embankments are founded on residual and alluvial soils that include layers of soft clay, green silt, sand, and gravel. The depth and composition of the overburden varied considerably over the length of the dam, but in all cases it was found that most of the foundation consolidation would take place during construction. This resulted in a construction schedule that called for excavating the core trench and placing a portion of the downstream fill as early as possible to pre-load and con- solidate the foundation. The cutoff trench under the core of the dam was carried to rock in areas where the presence of sand or gravel layers made it necessary to do so. In other areas the trench was terminated in residual clay, and the overburden was grouted after five ft of impervious fill had been placed in the trench. A grout curtain extends five ft into unweathered rock or to a minimum depth of 25 ft. Because of the relatively soft foundation and the embankment materials used, instrumentation for observing the performance of the dam was extensive. Installations included 48 surface settle- ment points, 23 observation wells, 24 piezometers, 10 cross-arm settlement devices, toe stakes, seepage weirs, and settlement platforms. Observation wells and settlement devices were also installed at the dikes on the reservoir rim. Harza carried out planning studies for an alternative Broko- pondo Development for the government of Suriname. The sub- sequent design of Afobaka Dam was by ALCOA engineers with advice, review, and technical assistance from Harza. Client: Ministry of Water and Power Khuzestan Water and Power Authority Location: Marun River, Iran Purpose: Irrigation water supply Scheduled completion: 1980 Nader Shah is the third major dam designed by Harza for con- struction in Iran. It will be a 170-m-high earth and rock fill em- bankment with a crest length of 360 m. The dam site is a narrow gorge cut through Asmari Limestones by the Marun River. Live reservoir storage is calculated at 1,000 million cum. An upstream cofferdam 55 m high (which will be incorporated into the main dam) and a 12-m-diameter horseshoe diversion tunnel Normal max. HW 509.0 = Rockfill Impervious (class!) will allow routing of the maximum recorded flood of 3,080 cumecs. A core trench excavated through overburden and weathered limestone will carry the impervious core down to sound rock. A grout curtain will extend the cutoff 100 m into limestone at the deepest section, laterally 150 m into the left abutment, and 100 m into the right abutment. The grout curtain will be constructed partly from a foundation gallery and partly from a number of adits at different elevations in both abutments. Drain holes downstream of the grout curtain will extend 450 m into the left abutment and 200 m into the right abutment. A similar curtain will parallel the spillway chute. Rockfill Semi-pervious Impervious(class!) Z \mpervious(class tI)~ Alluvium Acore of impervious clayey silt is contained by shells of granular material; the downstream outer shell is of rockfill. Coarse rockfill on the upstream slope above the maximum drawdown level will provide protection against erosion and allow free drainage of the shell during reservoir drawdown. Grout curtain Artist's rendering of Nader Shah shows the 170-m-high dam, chute spillway, and outlet valves for downstream irrigation releases. pee ae Fill Dams—7 MUSKINGUM FLY-ASH DAM Client: Ohio Power Company (AEP) Location: Beverly, Ohio Purpose: Fly-ash disposal Completed: 1975 The principal features of the Muskingum reservoir are the dam, a wing dike, a freeboard dike, and a spillway section to pass nomi- nal storm flows. The dam was designed with sufficient freeboard to store the probable maximum flood flows from runoff in the small drainage area, thus making an emergency spillway unnec- essary. Fly-ash from the 1375-MW Muskingum River Power Plant reaches the reservoir in slurry form via two 12-in pipelines. The dam, which is actually two dams separated by a ridge, has a total length of 2,900 ft. The two sections have maximum heights of 110 ft and 140 ft. Approximately 1,240,000 cu yds of fill were used in their construction. The dam has a conventional central impervious core config- uration with a core trench to sound rock. It was designed to be constructed as much as possible from power plant ash. The up- stream and downstream shells are of boiler slag, a hard granular material, and a filter downstream of the core is of bottom ash taken from the plant’s bottom ash storage pond. The only materials that were not ash products from the coal-burning process were the clay for the impervious core (excavated from within the reser- voir to increase storage capacity) and the riprap, which came from a quarry also developed within the reservoir. 8—Fill Dams Client: Ohio Power Company (AEP) Location: Cheshire, Ohio Purpose: Fly-ash disposal Completed: 1973 Gavin Dam was designed to provide a fly-ash disposal reservoir for the new, 2600-MW General James M. Gavin Power Plant The dam is 104 ft high at its maximum section, has a crest length of about 1,580 ft, and required approximately 1,800,000 cu yds of fill. A concrete service spillway in the left abutment was designed for the 100-year storm flows, and an emergency spill- way in the right abutment is provided for the probable maximum flood. The dam is designed to be raised 39 ft in two additional stages. The embankment is essentially a homogeneous structure overlying river sediments 60 ft thick. A core trench was excavated to sound rock and a grouted cutoff was installed. The lower part of both the upstream and downstream slopes were designed 8 horizontal to 1 vertical. A large portion of the fill material for the dam was obtained from excavation for the emergency spillway; the balance was taken from within the reservoir area in order to increase reservoir storage capacity. Fly-ash is pumped to the reservoir in slurry form through four 20-in pipelines. When the dam has been raised to its ultimate height of 143 ft it will provide a total of 37 years of fly-ash storage Client: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company Location: Near Warren, Pennsylvania Purpose: Pumped-storage power Completed: 1969 The Seneca Upper Reservoir, together with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Allegheny Reservoir (Kinzua Dam), provide the upper and lower reservoirs for the Seneca Pumped-Storage Project. The upper reservoir is located on a relatively flat plateau rising approximately 700 ft above the Allegheny River. The plateau is composed of an impervious shale in its lower portions, with a highly jointed sandstone above. Some of the joints are as much as a foot wide. The reservoir is formed by a perimeter dike approximately 2,500 ft in diameter and ranging in height from a minimum of 30 ft to a maximum of 115 ft. By taking fill material for the dike from within the reservoir, the fill and excavation quantities were essen- tially balanced, thus minimizing construction costs and increasing reservoir capacity. An impervious membrane of asphalt covers the side slopes and floor of the reservoir. On the side slopes the asphalt was applied in two 1%-in layers over 3 inches of porous asphaltic Detail of toe drain and asphalt lining. Seal coat and two 1%” layers asphaltic concrete —— 3” porous asphaltic concrete x Compacted fill Sand and gravel Gravel drain 10” perforated asbestos-concrete pipe concrete and a 12-in sand and gravel layer. Seepage into this zone is collected by a perforated pipe at the toe of the dike and then drained through 12-inch pipes under the dike at three natural low points. The asphalt for the reservoir floor was placed on a one-ft-thick layer of compacted silty sand. Most of the drainage under the floor is through the natural permeability and joint systems of the underlying sandstone. Some areas are equipped with per- forated pipe and gravel drains. Fill Dams—9 ANGAT PROJECT Client: National Power Corporation, Philippines Location: Angat River, Philippines Purpose: Power, municipal and irrigation water supply Completed: 1967 The Angat Project consists of a main rockfill dam 125 m high and 525 m long at the crest, plus a major rockfill dike 60 m high and 670 m long. The total volume of fill was about eight million cu m. Both embankments have sloping impervious cores and rockfill shells. Fill for the shells was obtained from nearby quarries and from excavation for the spillway. Core material was a combination of overburden and excavated material from the core trench and spillway. The crest height of the dam and dike was restricted by the nar- 10—Fill Dams row ridge upon which the dike is founded. The base of the dike is extremely narrow and, at the crest elevation selected, the side slopes extend below the top of the ridge, both upstream and down- stream. To prevent buildup of water pressure under the foundation and possible shear failure along the base of the dike, all overburden was removed and a subterranean drainage system provided. A grout curtain extending to a depth of 60 m below the dam and 40 m below the dike was developed by stage grouting beneath the core contact. Right: The project spillway (shown here during hydraulic model tests) is a chute type with three tainter gates, each 12.5 m wide by 15 m high The flip bucket turns the discharge downstream as well as up and away from the structure. Below: Photo taken during construction shows the relationship between the main dam at left and the spillway at right Fill Dams—11 YACYRETA-APIPE PROJECT Client: Entidad Binacional Yacyreta (EBY) 72 km in length and containing about 81,000,000 « ia- Location: Parana River, Argentina-Paraguay terial. The dams will have a maximum height an Purpose: Power, flood control, navigation, irrigation, recreation average height of 15 m. The foundation throuc 4 the Scheduled completion: 1981 embankment’s length is fine to medium san- 0 lick. Located on an international reach of the Parana River, Yacyreta- ber conaltlonsiieye CC weicesion A cl rae Frist ‘ - jam: (1) where the dam height is greater the nit dally Apipe is a joint project of Argentina and Paraguay. One of the zoned desian with seepage cutoff to rock. a ai fasc rincipal features of the project will be fill dams totaling nearly aw peo) 4 c Pp than 15 m (as with the 50-km long embankn” sy reta | Island) a homogeneous sand section with s ont = =dby I drainage features that include downstrean Jar 5 and | Feuicem 3 N relief wells. Studies are also underway to det a¢ = nomic | i Navigation | advantages, if any, of providing impervious t ’ stoffs to | lock reduce total seepage quantities. { Powerhouse A reregulating dam 55 km downstrear main dam Sac — will require fill dams with a maximum heigh and a total £ a length of 12 km. [ Fish facilities Spillway Bi pal Approach \\ expansion penne \ V x 0500 Cx 5 meters Earthfill dam See Spillway ~~ sLock OD RE-REGULATING 1, 2a Client: U.S. Army Corps of Enginers, Huntington District Location: Gauley River, West Virginia Purpose: Flood control, low flow augmentation Completed: 1965 Summersville Dam is 390 ft high, has a crest length of 2,300 ft, and contains 10,000,000 cu yds of fill. It is a rolled rockfill embank- ment with a vertical impervious core. The axis of the dam is bowed upstream to better fit the topography of the site and for added protection against cracking of the core in the event of small downstream movements. Fresh sandstone for the rockfill shells came from excavation for the spillway and from nearby quarry sites. The shells were Photograph of construction operations shows the core and shell placed in three zones to best utilize the materials available. Nine- materials during placement and the core trench excavated in the in maximum size rock, compacted in 12-in lifts, makes up the abutments. inner zone; 18-in maximum size rock, compacted in 24-in lifts, 12—Fill Dams was placed in the middle zone; and a thin blanket of dumped oversized rock provides an outer layer. Core material, which was obtained from stripping for required excavation and from borrow areas, was also placed in zones. Its composition varied from lean clay to silty and sandy soils. Geologically, the dam site consists of overburden (exceed- ing 10 ft in thickness) composed of sand, gravel, and sandstone boulders; talus deposits up to 40 ft thick containing sandstone blocks with clay and sandy clay filler; and bedrock composed of alternating beds of sandstone and shale. Foundation treatment consisted of removing all overburden and severely weathered rock, constructing a core trench to fresh rock, and providing a grout curtain beneath the entire length of the dam. The grout cur- tain consists of three rows of holes extending to a maximum depth of 150 ft. In addition to the main dam, two saddle dikes of rolled rock- fill with impervious cores were also constructed. One is 80 ft high and 2,125 ft long, the other is 100 ft high and 3,320 ft long. Total fill volume for the two dikes was 1,600,000 cu yds. Construction of the dikes was similar to that of the main dam except that the rock shells were founded on overburden and the core extended only as deep as moderately weathered rock. Compacted shale was utilized in core construction. A small abandoned coal mine was encountered within the left abutment of one of the dikes, requiring some additional excavation and zoned backfill A 29-ft-diameter tunnel provided river diversion during con- struction and, with the addition of a gated intake and outlet valves, serves as a permanent flood control outlet. An uncontrolled, broad- crested concrete weir spillway (which discharges into an unlined excavated channel) is located at a low point in the reservoir rim The 29-ft-diameter diversion-outlet tunnel during construction Fill Dams—13 CERRON GRANDE PROUEGT Client: Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) Location: Lempa River, El Salvador Purpose: Hydroelectric power Scheduled completion: 1977 The dam of the Cerron Grande Project is a 90-m-high embankment of rock and sand fill with a thin, sloping core of clay. The crest length is about 850 m and it will contain 6,000,000 cu m of fill. An unusual feature of the project is the way in which the highly variable river flows are being handled during construction. During the dry season, from November to June, the relatively low river flows are diverted through an 8-m horseshoe diversion tunnel, while the site is unwatered for work in the river channel. During the balance of the year, when high flows and frequent floods make diversion impractical, the river is allowed to flow over the protected fill placed during the previous dry seasons. This procedure was continued through the first two years of construction. By the end of the third dry season (1975-1976) a portion of the dam (see schematic drawings) will be constructed to a level high enough to provide pondage and divert floods over the partially completed spillway. The dam will then be completed in the following year. Construction of the spillway and power facilities continues with- out interruption throughout the four-year construction period. Optimization of the dam design was based not orily on suitabil- ity for staged construction, but also on the fill materials available from excavation and borrow and on the physical aspects of the site. 14—Fill Dams ee River Bed End of 2nd dry-season construction First dry season construction consisted of excavation to rock, foundation preparation, and placement of some fill. General view of Cerron Grande under construction shows the chute Spillway at right, the powerhouse at left center, and the fill dam beyond. End of 3rd dry-season construction Completed dam River diverted over partially completed spillway. Fill Dams—15 PRIEST RAPIDS PROJECT Client: Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington Location: Columbia River, Washington Purpose: Power, flood control, future navigation Completed: 1961 The 110-ft-high embankments of the Priest Rapids Project have a combined crest length of 7,500 ft and contain 3,200,000 cu yds of fill. They are constructed of sand and gravel shell material with impervious central cores of sandy silt. The foundation of the em- bankments consists of highly pervious gravels averaging 65 ft in depth. In order to establish a positive cutoff, a core trench was excavated through the gravels to bedrock. The core trench under the left embankment was carried to the left abutment, where it turns upstream for 1000 ft. Heavy seepage through the gravels during excavation was drained to the river end of the trench and pumped over the cofferdam. Seep- age from occasional cracks in the foundation rock was pumped from riser pipes concreted in place. When the riser pipes were no longer needed they were grouted, capped, and covered by the fill. Bedrock under the right embankment was above groundwater level, simplifying construction of the core trench. A grout curtain was carried about 1800 ft to the left and 1500 ft to the right of the river channel. Priest Rapids Project The Tilden tailings pond. TILDEN TAILINGS DAM Client: The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company Location: Near Ishpeming, Michigan Purpose: Disposal of mine tailings Scheduled completion: 1977 Tilden Dam will create a tailings disposal pond for the new Tilden concentrator and pelletizing plant which is producing iron ore pellets at the rate of 4,000,000 tons per year. The tailings will be pumped to the tailings pond in slurry form through a 5-mile-long pipeline. The main dam will have a crest length of 16,000 ft and a maximum height of 70 ft. Provisions have been made in the design for raising the dam an additional 30 ft. There are also several saddle dikes around the reservoir rim to confine the tailings to the owner's property. A small spillway was designed to pass nom- inal storm flows. The dam and dikes will have sufficient freeboard to store the largest inflows expected from large storms in the small drainage area, thus making an emergency spillway un- necessary. Construction of the main dam will require 6,000,000 cu yds of sand. This material will be obtained from within the reservoir to increase reservoir storage. The dam will be of sand fill and will be homogeneous in design with the exception of an impervious, sloping upstream core comprised of silty and clayey borrow ma- terials. A slurry trench approximately 10,000 ft long and up to 80 ft deep will provide a cutoff through the sand foundation. 16—Fill Dams ELEGTRIG LAKE OAM Client: Utah Power and Light Company Location: Near Huntington, Utah Purpose: Thermal plant water supply Completed: 1974 Electric Lake Dam is located in a narrow canyon on Huntington Creek at an altitude of 8,500 ft. The canyon walls are composed of sandstones and some shales, nearly horizontally bedded. Ver- tical relief joints, some several inches wide, parallel the valley. The earth dam is 223 ft high. It has a slightly inclined and relatively narrow impervious clay core supported by shells of silty and sandy gravels. Due to the high percentage of material finer than #200 mesh in the shells, they too are relatively impervious. The fissured and jointed sandstones in the abutments, however, required extensive grouting for seepage control. The grout curtain extends to a maximum depth of 100 ft The spillway and outlet works are combined in a single struc- ture that includes a morning-glory intake at the top of a tall vertical tower, a valve chamber at the foot of the tower, and a reinforced concrete conduit 7 ft in diameter and about 1000 ft long running under the dam. A stilling basin at the downstream end of the con- duit dissipates the energy of the spillway and valve discharges. Access to the top of the tower is by cable car. Electric Lake Dam Main embankment ( (N Fill Dams—17 Client: Development Board, Government of Iraq Location: Diyala-Sirwan River, Iraq Purpose: Irrigation water supply, flood control, future power Completed: 1963 With a maximum height of 130 m, Derbendi Khan was the highest rockfill dam in the world when completed. It has a crest length of 450 m and contains 7,100,000 cu m of fill. Construction of the dam included a vertical core of rolled impervious material and rockfill shells of quarried limestone. The limestone shells were end-dumped and sluiced after placing. To facilitate construction, the exterior slopes of the dam were formed in a series of 10-m benches with the design slope intersecting the centers of the benches. The slope between the benches is at the natural angle of repose for the material. The geologic formations on which the dam rests include a 18—Fill Dams bituminous marl, a sandstone-marl-limestone complex (the Buff formation), and a green marl of varying soundness. The bituminous marl is under the upstream half of the dam and extends for a short distance under the core in the river bed. The Buff formation underlies most of the core and the entire downstream shell of the dam A chute spillway with a discharge capacity of 11,400 cumecs is located on the right abutment. It is controlled by three radial gates, each 15 by 15 m. Two diversion tunnels, 6 and 9 m in dia- meter, were equipped with intakes and outlet valves for irrigation releases and future power generation. Above: Construction of the embankment from upstream. Left: The spillway with one section of the chute in operation. Spillway Jams Grouting galleries—~ Excavation ine \ irtair (90m) Grouting under the dam was carried out from inside concrete grouting galleries in order to permit placement of fill while grouting was in progress. The grout curtain is 90 m deep in most areas, with some exploratory and grout holes continuing to a depth of 120 m. Fill Dams—19 AMBURLAD PROJECT Client: National Power Corporation, Philippines Location: Agno River, Philippines Purpose: Hydroelectric power Completed: 1955 The Ambuklao rockfill dam is 133 m high, has a crest length of 450 m, and contains 6,900,000 cu m of fill. For several years after the reservoir was filled in 1956, this was the highest dam of its type in full operation In design, the dam has a vertical impervious core and rock- fill shells. The upstream shell is a combination of conventional rockfill with a zone of granular material where the shell is in con- tact with the core and the foundation. The clayey material used in the core came from borrow areas on the tops of adjacent hills, and the rockfill and granular material was quarried near the site The first large blast in one of the quarries resulted in material ranging from sand-size particles to large boulders. Being unsuit- able for the conventional dumped rockfill method of construction, 20—Fill Dams Ambuklao Dam and 8,800-cumec-capacity spillway these materials required a major revision in the design of the dam. A new section was devised that allowed the use of the finer blasted material without changing the overall dimensions of the dam. Construction involved end-dumping and sluicing the down- stream shell, while the balance of the material was placed in lifts and rolled with a 50-ton rubber-tired roller The principal rocks in the vicinity are diorite and a series of deeply weathered metamorphosed andesite, tuffs, lavas, and sedimentary rocks. Below the weathered zone the rock is hard and the fractures tight. A grout curtain extending to a maximum depth of 92 m was developed by stage-grouting beneath the core of the dam. More than 22,000 m of grout hole were required Petenwell Dam PETENWEbb & CASTLE ROGH Client: Wisconsin River Power Company Location: Wisconsin River, Wisconsin Purpose: Hydroelectric power Completed: 1949-50 Petenwell and Castle are twin dams located on adjacent reaches of the Wisconsin River. The projects are notable in that all major structures (including the dams, spillways, and powerhouses) were constructed on foundations of sand without the use of bearing piles or seepage cutoffs to bedrock. The layer of sand under the structures exceeds 100 ft in depth throughout the area. The dams, which are approximately 50 ft high, are built entirely of sand with toe drains and ditches providing the only seepage control. Seep- age lines measured by instrumentation within the dams, as well as more than 25 years of acceptable service, confirm the effec- tiveness of the design concept The spillways and powerhouses were constructed on rein- forced concrete slabs with sheet piling around their perimeters for seepage control and protection against undermining by scour Castle Rock Dam Measured seepage line Computed seepage line Seepage line computed prior to construction, shown in black, compares well with actual seepage levels shown in color Fill Dams— 21 Pinopolis Dam on the Cooper River, South Carolina. SANTEE-COOPER PROJECT Client: South Carolina Public Service Authority Location: Santee and Cooper Rivers, South Carolina Purpose: Power, navigation Completed: 1942 The Santee-Cooper Project consists of two reservoirs connected by an eight-mile-long canal. The Santee Dam across the Santee River is 7.3 miles long; the Pinopolis Dam across the Cooper River consists of a 1.5-mile-long main dam and approximately 28 miles of low dams and dikes around the reservoir. Heights of these em- bankments vary from less than five ft to more than 75 ft. The Pinopolis Dam and dikes are constructed from well graded sandy clay compacted in one-ft layers. Where embankments were five ft high or less, the fill was loose dumped. Three miles of the Santee Dam were also constructed of rolled sandy clay fill; the remaining 4.3 miles were of sand with a core of fines placed by standard hydraulic fill methods. The geology of the area consists of a thin clay layer underlain by as much as 30 ft of sand. The sand is underlain by marl and soft limestone. At the Pinopolis site the interface between the marl and limestone is a potential zone of high water flow. Lime- stone cavities were encountered in the upper 25 ft of this formation. Cutoff below the dams was provided by core trenches ex- tending to the marl deposits. No grouting was required at the Santee Dam. Cement grouting was performed at the marl-limestone contact under Pinopolis Dam; where limestone cavities were en- countered, a grout composed of sandy clay with 10% cement 22—Fill Dams Santee Dam and spillway. was used to fill the cavities and stabilize the structure. A total of 1,792 clay grout holes were drilled, and grout take totaled 21,000 cu yds. Both dams are subjected to wave action from wind fetches of up to 12 miles. Due to the absence of sound riprap material in the area, porous concrete slope protection was provided on the upstream faces of the dams, with concrete wave deflectors at at the crests. Porous concrete was selected for its ability to elim- inate uplift by allowing equalization of water pressure. Only where embankments were very low was rock riprap used. A spillway, located on the Santee River, is 3,400 ft long and is controlled by 62 gates, each 14 ft high by 50 ft long. Power facilities and a navigation lock are located on the Cooper River. The lock has a lift of 75 ft, the highest ever constructed at the time Sa Fiih OAM SUMMARY OF FILL DAM EXPERIENCE YEAR INITIAL MAX.HEIGHT CREST LENGTH NAME OF DAM LOCATION TYPEOFDAM OPERATION (meters) (feet) (meters) (feet) 1. Yacyreta-Apipe ParanaR., Argentina-Paraguay Earthfill 1981* 41 135 72,000 236,000 Guri Dam, Raising Caroni River, Venezuela 1980* 2. Main Dams Earth & Rock 110 360 10,000 32,800 a Dikes Earthfill 40 102 12,000 39,400 Bath County Back Creek, Virginia 3. Lower Reservoir Earthfill 1980* 56 185 690 2,265 Upper Reservoir 1980* 4. Main Dam Rockfill 146 480 670 2,200 Sediment Dam Earthfill 30 100 150 380 5. Hrauneyjafoss Tungnaa R., Iceland Rockfill 1979* 15 49 3,000 9,840 6. Nader Shah Marun River, Iran Rockfill 1979* 170 558 360 1,180 Rio Lindo Expansion Lindo River, Honduras 7. Ca Pita Earthfill 1978* 10 33 31075-1017 8. Rio Yure Earth & Rock 1978* 58 190 185 607 9. Rio Varsovia Rockfill 1978* 8 26 70 230 10. Cerron Grande Lempa River, El Salvador Earth & Rock 19772 90 295 850 2,800 11. Ullum San Juan R., Argentina Earthfill AST 54 ATT 350 1,150 12. Gotvand Diversion Karun River, Iran Earthfill 1975** 22 72 500 1,640 “Under Design **Under Construction ——— : =4 &: 1. Yacyreta-Apipe meters feet Impervious Fill 24—Fill Dams 6. Nader Shah ws VOLUME (cubic meters) (cubic yards) PURPOSE REMARKS 81,000,000 106,000,000 Power, flood control, irrigation, Harza is lead firm in a consortium of seven firms navigation, water supply, recreation Power 50,000,000 65,400,000 13,000,000 17,000,000 Pumped storage power 2,830,000 3,700,000 17,400,000 22,800,000 92,000 120,000 640,000 835,000 Power Associate: Thoroddsen and Partners 6,750,000 8,840,000 Irrigation storage Associate: F.& H.R.Farman-Farmaian Power 30,000,000 39,290,000 550,000 720,000 20,000,000 26,200,000 6,000,000 7,860,000 Power Associate: Ing. A. Garcia Prieto 3,000,000 3,920,000 Irrigation, power 250,000 330,000 Irrigation Associate: F.& H.R.Farman-Farmaian 4. Bath County, Upper Reservoir, Main Dam 7. Rio Lindo Expansion, La Pita 11. Ullum . Cerron Grande 9. Rio Lindo Expansion, Rio Varsovia 12. Gotvand Diversion Fill Dams—25 YEAR INITIAL MAX. HEIGHT CREST LENGTH NAME OF DAM LOCATION TYPEOFDAM OPERATION (meters) (feet) (meters) (feet) 13. El Chocon Limay River, Argentina Earthfill 1975"* 86 282 2,300. = 7,546 Planicie Banderita NeuguenR., Argentina 14. Main Dams Earthfill 19757" 87 285 545 1,790 Dikes Earthfill 1975" * 20 66 11,300 37,000 15. Muskingum Beverly, Ohio Earthfill 1975 43 140 503 1,650 16. Electric Lake Huntington Cr., Utah Earthfill 1974 68 223 305 1,000 17. Olin Effluent Sump Joliet, Illinois Earthfill 1974 1p | 36 244 800 18. Olin HGF Reservoir Joliet, Illinois Earthfill 1973 1 36 820 2,690 19. Ni River Ni River, Virginia Earthfill 1973 19 62 427 1,400 20. Gavin Fly Ash Gallipolis, Ohio Earthfill 1973 45 147 482 1,580 21. Finchaa Finchaa River, Ethiopia Earthfill 1973 20 65 340 4,415 22. Mountain Run Culpepper County, Virginia Earthfill 1971 12 39 373 1,225 23. Upper Clinch, Tazewell, Virginia Earthfill 1971 16 52 213 700 Dam No.8 24. Rio Lindo Rio Lindo, Honduras Rockfill 1971 25 82 360 1,180 20: a Reservoir _ Joliet, Illinois Earthfill 1970 11 36 1,466 4,810 0. 26. Santa Rita(Guatape) Nare River, Colombia Earthfill 1970 30 98 560 1,835 27. Burfell Thjorsa River, Iceland Rockfill 1969 15 49 6,300 20,700 28. Kinzua Dike Allegheny River, Pennsylvania — Earthfill 1969 35 115 2,480 8,135 29. Guri Caroni River, Venezuela Rockfill 1969 85 279 220 720 30. Baldwin Kaskaskia River, Illinois Earthfill 1968 le 56 16,000 52,000 15. Muskingum **Under Construction 17. Olin Effluent Sump 0 30 0 100 : 16. Electric Lake ET) |) | Ce meters feet AE = . . ee Impervious Fill 26—Fill Dams 18. Olin HGF Reservoir 19. Ni River VOLUME (cubic meters) (cubic yards) PURPOSE : REMARKS 13,000,000 17,026,000 Power, flood control, irrigation Design & specifications by Harza Power, flood control, irrigation Design & specifications by Harza 3,300,000 4,320,000 3,200,000 4,190,000 950,000 1,240,000 Fly ashretention Constructed of boiler waste 1,452,000 1,900,000 Power plant water supply 29,000 38,000 Pollution control Modifications to existing dam 193,000 252,000 Chemical waste storage 166,000 217,000 Flood control and municipal water supply 1,377,000 1,800,000 Fly ashretention 250,000 327,000 Power 94,000 123,000 Water supply, flood control 102,000 133,000 Water supply, flood control 480,000 628,000 Power 92,000 120,000 Chemicai waste storage 943,000 1,235,000 Power Harza reviewed engineering by others 710,000 930,000 Power 1,890,000 2,470,000 Pumped-storage power Reservoir asphalt lined 2,100,000 2,750,000 Power, flood control 1,460,000 1,910,000 Steam plant cooling 20. Gavin Fly Ash 22-)Mountaln aun 23. Upper Clinch Dam No.8 21. Finchaa 7 24. Rio Lindo 27. Burfell all 28. Kinzua Dike Fill Dams—27 YEAR INITIAL MAX. HEIGHT CREST LENGTH NAME OF DAM LOCATION TYPEOFDAM OPERATION (meters) (feet) (meters) (feet) 31. Slovene Camp Enon Valley, Pennsylvania Earthfill 1967 10 33 300 985 Angat Angat River, Philippines 1967 32. Main Dam Rockfill 125 410 525 1,720 Dikes Rockfill 60 197 670 ~=—2,200 La Yeguada Project San Juan River, Panama 1967 33. LaYeguada Dam San Juan River, Panama Earthfill 8 26 436 1,431 34. EI FlorDam Hato Creek, Panama Earthfill 1967 14 46 117 384 35. Kincaid Clear Creek, Illinois Earthfill 1966 20 66 490 1,600 36. Hogg Generating Montreal River, Canada Earthfill 1965 27 89 226 741 Station 37. Brokopondo Suriname River, Suriname 1965 Dam Earthfill 54 177 1,913534'6,275 Dikes Earthfill 30 100 6,500 21,000 38. Summersville 1965 Dam Gauley River, West Virginia Rockfill 120 390 700 2,300 Dikes Earthfill 40 130 1,660 5,445 39. Wanapum Columbia River, Washington Earthfill 1963 57 186 151502) - 5,100 40. Canaveral Lindo River, Honduras Earthfill 1963 20 66 374 1,225 41. Derbendi Khan Diyala River, Iraq Rockfill 1963 AGT 450 445 1.460 42. Ross Barnett Pearl River, Mississippi Earthfill 1962 20 64 5,600 18,400 43. Priest Rapids Columbia River, Washington Earthfill 1961 50 180 2,300 7,430 _2. 2 <= 7a oe 31. Slovene Camp 33. La Yeguada Dam 32. Angat Main Dam a 34. El Flor Dam 35. Kincaid = fe zg 0 30 0 100 Ee Z= 1 eae ee oe meters feet 36. Hogg Generating Station Impervious Fill 37. Brokopondo Dam 28—Fill Dams 41. Derbendi Khan VOLUME (cubic meters) (cubic yards) PURPOSE REMARKS 20,000 26,000 Recreation Power, irrigation, water supply 6,300,000 8,280,000 1,700,000 2,200,000 Power 52,000 68,000 48,000 62,000 310,000 405,000 Steam plant cooling water 201,000 263,000 Power Power Planning and review of design by Harza 8,400,000 11,000,000 2,250,000 2,950,000 8,250,000 10,800,000 1,200,000 1,550,000 3,570,000 4,670,000 Power, flood control, future navigation 270,000 343,000 Power 7,100,000 9,300,000 Irrigation, flood control, future power 2,600,000 3,400,000 Municipal water supply, recreation 2,520,000 3,300,000 = Power, flood control, future navigation Flood control, low flow augmentation — Pe 40. Canaveral 39. Wanapum 38. Summersville Dam 43. Priest Rapids Fill Dams— 29 45. 46. 47. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 61. NAME OF DAM Kingsport Puente Viejo Dike Mud River Hollingsworth Falls Panchet Hill *** Maithon Dam Dikes Boulder Creek Fellows Lake Ambuklao Vermilion McPhail Falls Lake Lemon Scott Falls Castle Rock Dam Dikes Manitowic Petenwell Dam Dikes Santee Dam Pinopolis Dam LOCATION Near Holston River, Tennessee Lake Guija, El Salvador Mud River, Kentucky Michipicoten River, Canada Damodar River, India Barakar River, India Boulder Creek, Utah Sac River, Missouri Agno River, Philippines Vermilion River, Illinois Michipicoten River, Canada Bean Blossom Creek, Indiana Michipicoten River, Canada Wisconsin River, Wisconsin Michipicoten River, Canada Wisconsin River, Wisconsin Santee & Cooper Rivers, South Carolina Santee & Cooper Rivers, South Carolina ***Not illustrated ZS 7" 44. Kingsport 47. Hollingsworth Falls Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Rockfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Sandfill Sandfill Earthfill Sandfill Sandfill Earthfill Earthfill YEAR INITIAL 1961 17 1961 20 1960 2 1959 37 1959 49 1958 52 1S 1958 41 1955 31 1955 131 1954 23 1954 20 1953 13 1952 29 1950 13 8 1949 15 1949 18 i 1942 15 23 =e 56 66 40 121 160 170 50 35 102 430 75 66 42 95 43 25 50 58 23 48 76 46. Mud River 250 510 2,314 6,750 670 2,650 176 663 451 168 183 189 294 366 6,040 67 2,600 12,050 11,700 47,600 MAX. HEIGHT CREST LENGTH TYPEOF DAM OPERATION (meters) (feet) (meters) (feet) 820 1,672 7,590 22,140 2,200 8,700 579 2,175 1,480 550 600 620 965 1,200 19,800 220 8,500 39,500 38,500 156,000 49. Maithon Dam 0 30 O 100 Lui_ (ae) meters feet Ae. 50. Boulder Creek J Impervious Fill 30—Fill Dams 51. Fellows Lake VOLUME (cubic meters) (cubic yards) 153,000 163,000 23,000 1,405,000 5,300,000 2,730,000 410,000 12,000 1,500,000 7,674,000 230,000 149,000 82,000 395,000 268,000 632,000 19,000 1,174,000 1,772,000 9,070,000 4,510,000 ae vy 52. Ambuklao 57. Castle Rock Dam 200,000 213,000 30,000 1,840,000 6,930,000 3,570,000 537,000 16,000 1,960,000 10,050,000 314,000 195,000 107,000 517,000 350,000 827,000 25,000 1,535,000 2,316,000 11,800,000 5,900,000 58. Manitowic PURPOSE Industrial waste storage Storage for downstream power Flood control Power Power, flood control, irrigation supply Power, flood control, irrigation supply Power Municipal water supply Power, flood control Steam plant cooling water Power Municipal water supply, recreation Power Power, flood control Power Power, flood control Power, flood control, navigation 54. McPhail Falls REMARKS Four small dams with outlet facilities Impervious core of rock flour Power plant underground Power plant underground Impervious core of rock flour Impervious core of rock flour All structures on sand foundation Impervious core of rock flour All structures on sand foundation Portions of fill hydraulically placed 56. Scott Falls 59. Petenwell Dam = Se SH AE == 61. Pinopolis Dam Fill Dams—31 REPRESENTATIVE SPILLWAYS— Heads Greater Than 150 Feet (Scale— 1:2500) NORMAL MAX. HEAD PROJECT NAME LOCATION TYPE OF DAM INITIAL OPERATION (feet) (meters) 1. Guri, Final Stage Caroni R., Venezuela Conc. Gravity 1982 472 145 Initial Stage 1968 300 92 2. Ullum San Juan R., Argentina Rockfill 1978 253 77 3. Cerron Grande Lempa R., El Salvador Rockfill 1977 195 60 4. Reza Shah Kabir Karun R., Iran Cone. Arch 1976 536 165 5. Electric Lake Huntington Cr., Utah Earthfill 1974 228 70 6. Mossyrock Cowlitz R., Wash. Conc. Arch 1969 345 106 7. Mangla Jhelum R., Pakistan Rockfill 1968 260 80 2. Ullum 3. Cerron Grande 1. Guri, Final Stage Initial Stage 0 100 0 30 et Coenen feet meters 7. Mangla 2—Spillways NORMAL MAX. SPILLWAY GATES SPILLWAY CAPACITY HEAD ON CREST NO. & TYPE, WIDTH X HEIGHT (cuft/sec.) (cum/sec.) (feet) (meters) (feet) (meters) TYPE OF SPILLWAY 1,000,000 30,000 65 20 Existing gates raised Gated chute 1,240,000 35,000 65 20 9-Radial 50x65 15x20 Gated chute 61,000 qif22 56 17 Ungated Side channel chute 350,000 10,000 49 a5) 4-Radial 40x50 12x15 Gated chute 565,000 16,000 65 20 3-Radial 50x65 15x20 Gated chute 2,330 66 — - Ungated Morning glory 276,000 7,800 49 15 4-Radial 43x50 13x15 Gated overfall 1,100,000 31,000 114 35 9-Radial 36x40 11x12 Gated orifice with chute i 4. Reza Shah Kabir 5. Electric Lake 6. Mossyrock — Spillways—3 REPRESENTATIVE SPILLWAYS— Heads Greater Than 150 Feet (Scale— 1:2500) 10. a1. 12. 13. 14, 15. PROJECT NAME LOCATION Angat Angat R., Philippines . Mayfield Cowlitz R., Wash. Derbendi Kahn Diyala R., Iraq Amir Kabir (Karadj) Karadj R., Iran Ambuklao Agno R., Philippines 5 de Noviembre Lempa R., El Salvador Heads 150 Feet or Less (Scale— 1:1250) Gotvand Karun R., Iran Lower Tachien Tachia R., Taiwan 10. Derbendi Kahn 4—Spillways TYPE OF DAM Rockfill Gravity & Arch Rockfill Conc. Arch Rockfill Conc. Gravity Earthfill Gate Structure 9. Mayfield NORMAL MAX. HEAD INITIAL OPERATION (feet) (meters) 1967 348 107 1963 172 53 1963 341 105 1962 488 150 1955 348 107 1954 182 56 1976 49 15 1971 65 20 0 100 Lu feet 0 30 SS meters NORMAL MAX SPILLWAY GATES SPILLWAY CAPACITY HEAD ON CREST NO. & TYPE, WIDTH X HEIGHT (cuftisec.) (cum/sec.) (feet) (meters) (feet) (meters) TYPE OF SPILLWAY 205,000 5,800 49 15 3-Radial 41x49 12.5x15 Gated chute 337,000 9,500 39 12 5-Radial 41x40 12.5x12 Gated chute 400,000 11,400 49 15 3-Radial 49x49 15x15 Gated chute 50,000 1,400 33 10 2-Radial 33x33. 10x10 Gated chute 390,000 11,000 39 12 8-Radial 41x40 12.5x12 Gated chute 350,000 10,000 39 12 7-Radial 41x40 12.5x12 Gated overflow 280,000 8,000 23 tg 14-Radial 40x23 12.2x7.1 Gated overflow 225,000 6,400 65 20 3-Radial 35x66 11x20 Gated overflow 11. Amir Kabir (Karadj) 14. Gotvand 12. Ambuklao a ane 15. Lower Tachien QO 13. 5 de Noviembre 0 50 0 15 feet meters Spillways—5 REPRESENTATIVE SPILLWAYS— Heads 150 Feet or Less (Scale—1:1250) PROJECT NAME 16. Burfell 17. Kincaid 18. Afobaka (Brokopondo) 19. Wanapum 20. Ross Barnett 21. Priest Rapids 22. Lake Guija 23. Maithon 24. Box Canyon 25. Petenwell 26. Santee-Cooper —— 16. Burfell LOCATION Thjorsaa R., Iceland Clear Cr., Illinois Suriname R., Suriname Columbia R., Wash. Pearl R., Miss. Columbia R., Wash. Desague R., El Salvador Barakar R., India Pend Oreille R., Wash. Wisconsin R., Wis. Santee R., S. Carolina 18. Afobaka (Brokopondo) 6—Spillways 30 Remedial meters TYPE OF DAM Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Conc. Gravity Conc. Gravity Gate Structure Sandfill Earthfill 17. Kincaid INITIAL OPERATION 1970 1965 1965 1963 1962 1961 1956 1958 1955 1949 1942 Q 19. Wanapum NORMAL MAX. HEAD (feet) (meters) 15 45 55 17 150 46 81 25 42 13 81 25 72 22) 150 46 41 125 42 13 49 15 20. Ross Barnett NORMAL MAX. SPILLWAY GATES SPILLWAY CAPACITY HEAD ON CREST NO. & TYPE, WIDTH X HEIGHT (cuft/isec.) (cum/sec.) (feet) (meters) (feet) (meters) TYPE OF SPILLWAY 70,000 2,000 6.5 2 4-Bascule 66x 8 20x25 Gated overflow 5,100 145 8.1 25 Ungated Duckbill chute 210,000 6,000 39 12 5-Radial 40x35 12x11 Gated overflow 1,400,000 40,000 65 20 12-Radial 50x65 15x20 Gated overflow 200,000 5,700 21 6.4 10-Radial 40x20 12x 6 Gated overflow 1,400,000 40,000 49 15 22-Radial 40x50 12x15 Gated overflow 9,000 250 72 22 3-Radial 15x11 4.6x3.4 Gated orifice 595,000 17,000 39 12 12-Radial 41x40 12.5x12 Gated overflow 350,000 10,000 59 18 4-Fixedwheel 40x62 12x19 Gated overflow 216,000 6,100 18 5.5 16-Radial 30x18 9x5.5 Gated overflow 800,000 23,000 12 3.7 62-Radial 50x14 15x4.5 Gated overflow act 22. Lake Guija 21. Priest Rapids 23. Maithon 24. Box Canyon 25. Petenwell 26. Santee-Cooper Spillways—7 Harza Services ... River Project Development The consulting services offered by Harza cover project development from initial studies and conceptual planning through analysis, design, construction and start-up. A large number of Harza assignments include this entire range. Alternatively, services may be provided (on a prime or sub-contract basis) for any separate phase or item of project work, including individual consulting advice from any of the specialists on Harza’s staff. In addition to services required for the construction of large dams, listed below, Harza also provides complete engineering of related project features. These include power system development and power plant design, irrigation and drainage facilities, flood control and protection, water supply systems, and navigation structures. Prefeasibility (Appraisal) Inventory of River Basin Potential Comparison of Alternatives Economic Evaluations Basin Master Plans Project Priorities Feasibility (Project Planning) Functional Optimization Foundation Exploration Selection of Structural Types Preliminary Design Construction Procedures and Programs Construction Cost Estimates Environmental Effects Licensing and Financing Permit and License Applications Environmental Impact Statements Economic Analyses Financial Analyses Expert Witness Testimony Design Field Investigations Geologic Evaluations Construction Materials Evaluations Structural and Hydraulic Model Tests Advanced Computer-programmed Analyses Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Design Structural Performance Instrumentation In addition to studies of existing and potential fisheries in rivers and reservoirs, Harza designs a variety of fish handling and fish propagation facilities. The Cowlitz River salmon hatchery, above, was designed to handle 16,500 adult fish per year. At right, fish ladders at Wanapum Dam on the Columbia River provide a lift of 94 ft. Fish barriers and special screens for water intakes are designed for both thermal and hydro power plants. Construction Bidding Documents and Drawings Bid Analyses Construction Drawings Construction Scheduling Construction Surveillance, On-site Inspections Review of Contractor's Drawings Review of Manufacturers’ Drawings Shop Tests and Materials Inspection Construction Certification Operation Project Start-up Personnel Training LIARZA i | Maintenance and Operation Mansa s ENGINEERING COMPANY Structural Performance Monitoring Periodic Safety Inspections 150 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606 Renovation and Remedial Measures for Old Dams (312) 855-7000 Si fe fee =] r= i = — = bid = = oS a a = we PERMITTING ASSISTANCE Harza Engineering Company provides consulting engineering services to private enterprise and government agencies throughout the world in the development of water, land, and energy resources. Harza was established in 1920 and is totally owned and controlled by its employees. In June 1979, the firm employed about 1,000 people. Approximately 75% of the technical staff are graduate engineers or scientists and more than one-third hold advanced degrees. More than 350 are Registered Professional Engineers. Consulting engineers for... WATER... Dams « Dikes * Control Structures Regional and River Basin Planning Water Quality Management Flood Control and Drainage Water Supply and Treatment Wastewater Collection and Treatment LAND... Irrigation and Drainage Land Reclamation Soil Conservation and Erosion Control Agricultural Economics Tunnels and Underground Structures Transportation Residuals Management ENERGY... Generation— Hydroelectric * Pumped-Storage * Combustion Turbines Transmission ¢ Distribution * Substations Thermal Plant Cooling Systems Electric System Management Energy and Mineral Resources Harza provides ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ranging from special studies to the preparation of complete environmental assessment reports. HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 150 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 + Tel. (312) 855-7000 + Cable: HARZENG CHICAGO + Telex 25-3540 Worldwide services through Harza Engineering Company International, Harza Engineering Company International S.A and Harza Overseas Engineering Company MAJOR AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE Environmental Management in Resource Development Public awareness of the relationship between development, en- vironmental management and human well-being mandates a comprehensive approach to all resource development projects. In the development process, good environmental management requires the blending of insight, judgement, and technical and ad- ministrative Competence to protect and enhance one set of values while advancing other values that may or may not be com- patible Electric Utility Industry Energy & Mineral Resources Industry River Development Projects Urban & Regional Studies To identify and solve environmental conflicts prior to the fixing of the project design, Harza’s Environmental Sciences Division works with project management personnel to integrate en- vironmental values into development planning at an early stage. This coordination produces cost-effective management solutions that render the project maximally compatible with public aspira- tions, government regulations, and ecological values. WHAT HARZA CAN DO FOR... The Environmental Affairs Manager The responsibilities of the Environmental Affairs Manager span not only the planning and construction of the project, but also the operation and ultimate disposition of project facilities and waste products. The problem of satisfying regulatory requirements throughout the life of the project is further complicated by frequent changes in environmental compliance requirements. In this regard, Harza provides a single source for not only the re- quired environmental studies and reports, but also an up-to-date knowledge of regulatory requirements currently in effect or con- templated by state, federal, and local agencies. Permit and license applications for which Harza can provide environmental contributions or complete document preparation services in- clude... NPDES permits for wastewater discharges SMCRA permits for underground and surface mining RCRA permits for solid waste disposal NRC environmental reports for uranium mining/milling license applications EPA air quality permits and PSD review Section 404 Corps of Engineers permits for dredged material disposal O Section 10 Corps of Engineers permits for construction on navigable waters O FERC licenses for hydroelectric projects 0 FWPCA Section 316(b) demonstration.reports for intake struc- tures As can be seen from the above list, Harza's services involve both new projects and projects presently in operation that must meet new or more stringent environmental standards. In either case, the company can assist the Regulatory Affairs Manager ooadao oo LEVELS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Harza’s environmental services range from preliminary ‘fatal flaw” studies to complete environmental assessments. To define the scope of environmental services and improve communication between Harza and client personnel, the following levels of en- vironmental study have been identified. 1. Limited Environmental Assessment or Environmental Review—Assignments of limited scope in which the environmen- tal aspects of a specific project element, operating feature, or construction procedure are investigated. Siting and design of a water intake structure, the development of a recreation facility, or control of erosion during construction are examples of features for which this level of study is appropriate 2. Environmental Reconnaissance—Carried out in con- junction with engineering appraisal studies, the environmental reconnaissance includes a generic review of the environmental and regulatory requirements generally associated with the type of development under consideration. Expected environmental im- pacts are evaluated for relative importance, regulatory re- quirements are compiled, and the timing and intensity of future environmental work are outlined. 3. Environmental Prefeasibility—Coincident with engineer- ing prefeasibility, this level of study includes comparative en- vironmental analyses of the various sites and design alternatives under consideration. Environmental personnel work closely with project planners to characterize combinations of sites and designs having environmental advantages or disadvantages suf- ficient to effect the feasibility of individual alternatives. with documentation and provide expert testimony before regulatory agencies. Harza personnel also participate in public meetings to explain project objectives and to generate local un- derstanding. The Project Manager Aside from providing site selection studies, geologic and hydrogeologic analyses, environmental assessments, and engineering design, the most important service Harza can provide the Project Manager is to assist in keeping his project ‘on track” in terms of ... © data acquisition © permit applications 0 engineering and environmental decision making © award of construction and equipment contracts © scheduling and surveillance of development On some assignments Harza provides individual environmental or engineering services as requested; on others, company per- sonnel act as an arm of the client organization, assisting with management problems ranging from the evaluation of alternative plans to the scheduling of activities and the assignment of priorities. In order to further reduce the number of contractual elements the Project Manager must handle, Harza frequently arranges and monitors subcontracts for specialized environmental and technical development services. These services might include aerial photography and mapping, subsurface drilling and geophysical exploration, specialized laboratory analyses, air quality investigations, and archaeological surveys. The results of these subcontracts are subsequently qualified and analyzed by Harza specialists and applied to the overall project evaluation and development effort. 4. Environmental Analysis—Feasibility-level environmental studies which identify and quantify all environmental impacts that could have a social, ecological, or economic bearing on project feasibility. This level of study is appropriate for projects in the United States for which the client is not ready to begin formal li- censing or permitting procedures, and for overseas projects where licensing requirements are often less formal. In either case the objective is to determine the environmental feasibility of the project. 5. Environmental Assessment—The first step in the for- malized process of demonstrating environmental feasibility under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Emphasis is placed on characterizing the existing environment, projecting future conditions, and determining environmental constraints to development in the project area. An analysis of possible alter- natives to the proposed development is also carried out in this stage. An Environmental Assessment Report is prepared ac- cording to the requirements of the lead agency identified for the project. 6. Environmental Impact Study—The final step in demon- strating environmental feasibility under NEPA is the Environ- mental Impact Statement (EIS) which amplifies the work done in the environmental assessment study. For types of development where procedures have become routine or standardized, relative- ly little additional work may be required at this stage—more com- plex or more controversial projects may require additional en- vironmental data collection and analysis. Public and regulatory agency presentations, if required, are generally included in this stage. Ecological baseline studies are an integral part of all environmen- tal work. Because the studies are intended to provide an ecological basis for decisions on whether, where, and how a pro- ject might be developed, the level of detail of the baseline datacan vary considerably with the level of the planning process. In the earliest stage, only enough information will be collected to identify potentially suitable sites and to allow a decision on whether or not to proceed to the next stage. Ultimately, data will be collected in sufficient detail to provide a reference baseline for: 1) predicting the effects of the proposed development, 2) defining appropriate alternatives or mitigating measures, and 3) designing programs to monitor the accuracy of the predictions and the effectiveness of the mitigations. d temperature readings in exis ferenc 2 ese! from which v ratories. Water temperature recorder used to gather data for a study c Depending on the stated goals of the client and the specific level of project development, Harza designs the most suitable program for obtaining the pertinent baseline information. These programs range from a compilation and review of secondary data sources (with or without site reconnaissance) to detailed field studies covering a variety of disciplines. Within the constraints of project confidentiality, Harza also maintains close liaison with governmental, university, and private sources of environmental information In many assignments Harza provides complete environmental services, including the compilation and review of existing data gathering additional field data, and preparation of environmental assessment reports. At other times the company will review and analyze the results of on-going field studies by others, and, when it is the most cost-effective approach, will subcontract long-term field studies to qualified specialists. For some clients, particularly those in foreign countries with a burgeoning environmental staff, Harza will design the baseline study program, trainthe necessary personnel, and supervise both the data collection and the preparation of the environmental report gists, sho ‘ad spectrui weighing é isheries s f the torage effects of the reservoirs of the Bath County Pumpe nder construction in Virginia PROJECT AND PERMITTING MANAGEMENT Harza has developed a professional management service called “Project Resource, Information, and Skills Management” or PRISM. The service is designed to provide the client's Project Manager with a cost-effective means of defining and conforming to licensing and premitting requirements during the development and operation of a project. Technical and economic aspects of the development process are analyzed and their performance monitored as well. PRISM reduces the uncertainties of regulatory compliance by providing . . 1. An inventory of federal, state, and local regulatory con- straints, including not only those in force but also those un- der revision and those being formulated; 2. Natural resource information from major disciplinary areas referenced to regulatory constraints; 3. A select multidisciplinary team of engineers and scientists under the direction of an experienced and informed leader; and 4. A technique for guiding management decisions that is capable of predicting risk, cost, and time required to ac- complish complex and dynamic tasks. The resulting com- puter analysis is sufficiently flexible to be updated through periodic review. SCALE IS IN WEEKS o Ss 10 15 2 2s 30 3 40 45 SO SS 60 65 70 75 S ter O—ia The development time of many projects is controlled by highly variable permitting requirements. Harza’s PRISM technique minimizes this uncertainty of scheduling by analyzing these and other time and economic factors and producing multiple critical paths reflecting varying degrees of probability of occurrence. Right: Development time and probability of attainment plotted along with computer-estimated project costs for one set of environmental- permitting data. The subsequent development of a family of time-cost probability curves allows the client to choose the most cost-effective schedule (based on financing costs, profit from early production, etc.) for which there is a reasonable probability of attainment. Regulatory constraints exert a major influence on getting a pro- ject into production at the earliest date and at the least cost. PRISM has been designed to separate the complex problems of development into smaller, more clearly defined elements and to keep the client and his Project Manager informed and in control. Contributing to this is an extensive inventory of regulations and the experience required to assess difficulties, devise cost- effective field programs, and plan appropriate alternatives to meet project schedules. The decision maker uses the PRISM output to optimize his decisions within a scenario of constraints and uncertainties. In addition, secondary benefits, such as improved relations with regulatory agencies and more efficient use of equipment and per- sonnel, will automatically accrue through systematic and orga- nized problem solving. Of PRISM’s four elements—inventory of constraints, resource information, team skills, and management techniques—the first three are standard professional services. The fourth is unique in that it provides a set of management tools using computer tech- niques programmed for graphic output. The system is based on four programs; CPM, PERT, PATHFINDER, and NETWORK PLOT, which together provide the probability distributions of project durations and associated costs at various confidence levels. Thus, the service can be used for technical and economic problem solving, as well as for its primary purpose of providing in- formation for managing environmental regulatory affairs. Some of the key graphic outputs are illustrated below. EACH + cquALs 2 occuRENces 66 er 68 69 Completion time histograms produced as part of the PRISM simulation illustrate the probability distribution on which development time requirements are based. rracco: = reawoo. w| 6 6 iy 760800 + go. - z in 7S2200- 70: a d 7 43600 i . es £ fs) 735000+ sO 6 z = al 5 - = Bo | evan. al 3 reece: 7 f 632000. BEBRKRKAERKRARRGESBESBSEEBSRAHKG THE ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES AND PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Recent trends in the interpretation and implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act are leading to increased emphasis on. . . CO Impact assessment methods that allow for a meaningful analysis of all reasonable project alternatives, and OC Methodologies which allow for both interagency and public (citizens groups) participation in the selection process. To provide the data processing capacity required to analyze a large number of alternatives and the flexibility required to analyze the sensitivity of the project and the environment to the sometimes conflictng goals of different groups, Harza has adopted a modified version of the Water Resources Assessment Methodology (WRAM), an analytical technique developed initially by the Corps of Engineers. With the WRAM process, once the pro- ject and environmental criteria have been established, a simple adjustment of the weighting or relative importance assigned to any aspect of the project will result ina completely new analysis. Thus, the WRAM program makes it possible not only to quickly analyze changes in subjective criteria from any source, but also to assimilate basic changes resulting from continuing data collec- tion or revised regulatory requirements. The simplified WRAM analysis shown here was done for a preliminary siting study. It illustrates the four basic parts of the computation: 1) The environmental variables are ranked according to importance and a Relative Importance Coefficient (RIC) assigned to each. The RICs are multiplied across (as with .500 x .417 = .209) to arrive at the Final RIC. For a more complex analysis there might be three or more levels or rankings. 2) The Alternative Choice Coefficient is the relative weight of that environmental variable in the various project alternatives. 3) The Final Choice Matrix is the result of multiplying the Alternative Choice Coefficients by the Final RICs. 4) Totaling the figures for each alternative @ Specifically, the WRAM procedure involves the following steps... OC Development of a hierarchical series of evaluation criteria for which the project is to be analyzed, © Assignment of a relative importance coefficient (relative weight) to each criterion, 0 Estimates of environmental impacts imposed by project alter- natives (including the “no action” alternative) by standard analytical methods, including computer modeling when ap- propriate, G Determination of alternative choice coefficients by use of se- quential pair-wise comparison, linear scaling, and suitability- function curves for the environmental impacts of each project alternative, and © Calculation of final choice coefficients from the relative impor- tance coefficients and alternative choice coefficients and summing the results for each alternative. The result of the comparison is an easily understood tabulation that displays an objective summation of all environmental impacts for each project alternative. The tabulation in not only an in- valuable aid in the final selection process, but also provides a record of the entire evaluation process. When desired, the WRAM methodology can be expanded to include integrated com- parisons of project engineering and cost factors as well. Once the initial analysis is completed, any new decision regarding the relative importance of any aspect of the project, whether coming from the client, a regulatory agency, or the public, can be easily in- corporated in a new run of the program. gives a ranking or Final Choice Coefficient for the alternative projects. In this example, higher numbers reflect better environmental quality, thus the higher Final Choice Coefficients indicate a greater probable environmental impact. Similar analyses can be used to determine “least impact project configuration” or “best mitigating procedure” from a variety of alternatives. Relative Importance | __ ; . - : - : | Coefficients Final | Alternative Choice Coefficients Final Choice Matrix | Environmental Variable | 1 2 3 Ric} A B C D E FIA B C D E F Aquatic Habitat 500 Length of permanent ' stream ‘= 417—— — 209 |.250 071 .179 .214 .143 .107 |.052 .015 .037 .045 .030 .022 Length of temporary stream 167 084 |.107 .250 143 036 .071 |.009 .021 .012 003 .006 Sinuosity All .209 |.232 .161 .161 .232 .089 .089 |.048 .034 034 .048 .019 .019 Terrestrial Habitat 500 Area of forest 333 166 |.250 .071 .179 .143 018 .214 |.042 .012 .030 .024 .003 .036 Length of riparian habitat 267 -133 |.250 .143 .107 .214 .179 .036 |.033 .019 .014 .028 024 .005 Area of pasture .200 100 |.250 161 .036 .161 .214 025 016 .004 .016 .021 No. of quarries 100 050 |.250 .089 214 089 .089 .089].013 .004 011 .004 .004 .004 Abandoned fields 100 050 |.250 .107 107 .107 .107 .107 ].013 .005 .005 .005 .005 .005 ® 235 126 .147 .170 .109 .097 Final Choice Coefficients Applied technology in remote sensing and data processing is an effective new dimension in Harza’s environmental and resource development services. Information derived from sensors carried aloft in satellites or high-altitude aircraft is being integrated into traditional data collection programs to provide better results at lower costs Remote sensing techniques have been successfully applied by ns of LANDSAT satellite ned to ni River B hydro 6 Harza scientists to studies of land use, distribution and types of vegetation, drainage patterns, and regional geology. These studies have involved settings ranging in size from proposed pro- ject sites to entire drainage basins. Use of digital records pro- duced by remote sensors has led to increasing use of the com- puter as a principal tool in data base management. This in turn has facilitated the development of simulation models to aid in the solu- tion of resource development problems. Because new images are available on a regular basis, the data are also useful in en- vironmental monitoring during project construction and operation ¢ a + Grey PAYEE x ‘ LEVEL COUN FREQUENCY . j 1 04004 \ pt 1166 5 s26u 120357 Ces a 1800 oe7TS Ss 178 06670 ; 6 tug 0.842 Ys \ 7 116 0.056 8 92 94346 X 5 9 138 0.525 t i} ye HN 4 +3! ‘ ¢ 12 a8 be38i ) 13 1273 4.790 , 8 1a 1363 5.129 \ oe 1S ee 5e10d \ 88 16 172 aaiTs \ 8s 17 2772 10.430 + 18 2697 10.148 x 5 3314 12.470 . 0 2164 Baras a 3h 1205 40527 ‘ 2 628 2.383 + 23 280 16054 \ ea 100 e376 \ es 33 Qeted x ce 16 96060 O6 . 38 3 0.008 * 2 2 9.908 0 0 9 Hist 1 and a portio compute: HABITAT, ECOSYSTEM, AND SOCIAL IMPACT MODELING Computer simulation is a powerful analytical tool with many ~ applications in the fields of environmental assessment and im- pact evaluation. Harza’s experience in computer modeling dates back to 1960 when the company developed a mathematical model to determine tidal effects on stream flows in the Mekong River delta in Southeast Asia. Since that time the company's library of technical programs (as opposed to those for ad- ministrative work) has grown to more than 300. This extensive collection of programs, many of which were developed or modified by Harza, makes it possible for the company to complete many assignments effectively and economically using “off-the- shelf” programs with which the operators are experienced. Habitat Modeling Habitat models are used to predict the physical and chemical response of the habitat to impacts and stressors from a variety of sources. Some of the most frequently used programs are... . Steady-state water quality simulation (QUAL II) Waste load determinations (AWMM) Urban drainage assessments (SWMM) Water quality in receiving streams (RECEIV) Thermal modeling of heated water discharges Water and heat budget analyses of reservoirs Water and contaminant movement in watersheds (WHTM) Hydrologic Engineering Center Model (HEC) Ecosystem Modeling The ecosystem programs listed below combine classical popula- tion dynamic modeling of single or multiple population systems with habitat models in order to better reflect component interac- tions. O Water quality for river reservoir systems (WQRRS) 0 Comprehensive lake ecosystem analyzer (CLEAN) O Simplified lake ecosystem (SIMPLE) Social Impact Modeling Simulations which address the human or social component of the environmental sphere include behavioral, aesthetic, and recrea- tional models. Some examples of these are... . Socioeconomic baseline evaluation Differential response to opportunity matrix Alternative futures forecasting Recreational demand and benefits estimation Visual impact assessment (VIEWIT) Fisheries management system (PISCES) Deer hunter participation simulation (DEPHA) oooaoa0aq0000 ooo0aqa000 Temperature contours 64 1000 0 #1000, Distance, / “ Second Utility Discharge 2000 3000 Ft. Computer-generated simulation of a thermal effluent plume was part of a study of alternative cooling water systems for a thermal generating plant located on Lake Michigan. Portion of a site evaluation map used in a visual impact analysis shows areas visible from specific observer points (black circles). Numbers are computer output indicating the number of observer points from which an area can be seen. Areas without numbers are invisible from all observer points. - 50 ~ WATER SURFACE ORAWDOWN For a new surface coal mine in the western U.S., Harza developed a ground water model to evaluate present conditions and predict future changes. Protecting the mining operation from unexpectedly large ground water inflows and determination of post-reclamation ground water conditions were primary objectives of the model. Harza carried out a full environmental assessment and prepared engineering and environmental portions of the FERC license application for the Kootenai River Hydroelectric Project in Montana. The project's overflow diversion dam and underground power station will minimize visual impact. The 2,100-MW Bath County Project of Virginia Electric and Power Company will be the largest pumped-storage project in the world when completed. In addition to designing the project, Harza prepared Exhibits H, I, L, M, and R of the FERC license application; made major contributions to the Environmental Impact Statement; and provided expert witness testimony at FERC hearings. Some of the specific environmental studies carried out by Harza are noted on the plan of the project. IMPACT MITIGATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT The wide range of project types on which Harza has provided en- vironmental services, and the extreme diversity of settings in which the projects are located, has resulted in the development of an equally diverse variety of impact mitigation and environmental enhancement measures. Protection and enhancement features have ranged from the design of intake screens to reduce fish mor- tality to the planning of project features that will blend into their surroundings. On other projects, such as the 2,100-MW Bath County Pumped-Storage Project described below, Harza has provided planning, design, license application, and services dur- ing construction of a complete range of terrestrial and aquatic resource protection measures, as well as recreation and beautification measures that will enhance the project's en- vironmental benefits. Some of the general areas of impact mitigation in which the company is experienced are . Aquatic Habitat Protection and Development QO Control of water quality and thermal characteristics O Aquatic plant and algae control Q Fish passing, spawning, and hatchery facilities O Flow regulation QO Sediment and non-point pollution control O Species protection and fisheries development Environmental and Sociological Considerations Reclamation of disturbed lands Revegetation and landscaping Erosion control Riparian and wetland habitat protection Visual impact mitigation Recreation and visitors’ facilities Resettlement programs Public health programs Community integration and cohesion Agricultural and livestock development programs ooao000o oa0o Harza has planned recreation facilities in conjunction with water supply projects, cooling water lakes, hydroelectric projects, and, as shown here, flood retention reservoirs located in suburban Chicago. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION Over the years, solid waste management has become a vital en- vironmental consideration. Harza’s involvement in the field began over 20 years ago with a series of assignments for Olin Corpora- tion that are continuing today. In recent years the company has applied a variety of water treatment, geotechnical, agricultural, and soil mechanics techniques to the solution of solid waste management problems—some of which result from the extremely large volumes of material involved and others from the chemical composition of the wastes. Some specific waste products for which Harza has provided evaluation, planning, or design services are . O Mine tailings and surface-mine overburden Dredge material and construction wastes Fly-ash and residual solid wastes from generating stations Gypsum, calcium chloride, soda ash, lime, fertilizer by-pro- ducts, and other chemical processing wastes Municipal solid waste and sludge disposal, including landfill, incineration, resource recovery, and sludge application to farm land O Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), mercury, and other toxic wastes Surface and Ground Water Protection Protecting our water resources from contamination by waste products and their leachates is one of several goals of solid waste management. Harza’s services in ground water protection range from exploration and analysis through design of protective measures, surveillance of construction, and implementation of monitoring programs. Specialists in engineering geology and hydrogeology prepare specifications and monitor drilling programs, perform aquifer tests, collect and analyze water samples, compile well inventories, and prepare hydrogeologic maps that characterize the ground water regime. In particularly complex situations, specialists in fluid mechanics might also model ground water movement using either two- or three- dimensional computer techniques. The results of these studies are used first to evaluate present and potential ground water im- pacts, and later, if necessary, to design the most cost-effective measure or combination of measures needed to meet en- vironmental goals. ooa Qa € EXTERIOR ¢ SLURRY TRENCH PERIMETER AND DIKE DITCH SURFACE COVER ¢ INTERIOR DRAINAGE DITCH \ \ SLOPE SLOPE <MEMBRANE \ 760 LANDFILL SLURRY TRENCH 740 + syc~ PERCHED ~ AQUIFER 720 ELEVATION IN FEET 700 LOWER CLAY 680 ca cee UNDERLYING SAND AQUIFER | One alternative for containing PBB in an existing 40-acre landfill in Michigan included construction of a continuous slurry-trench cutoff around the site, placement of a clay surface cover, and collection of surface drainage within and around the site. Some of the more important measures for protecting water resources are... . 0 Dams, dikes and stable tailings or solid waste slopes 0 Impervious liners for treatment or disposal ponds O Cement-bentonite or soil-bentonite slurry trenches to prevent seepage 0 Erosion control measures—including clay cover, seeding, riprap, etc. O Surface and sub-surface drains to control runoff and infiltration 0 Treatment of collected runoff or effluent O Well field pumping or recharge wells for ground-water pollution control O Containing systems for hazardous or toxic wastes O Existing or excavated underground disposal facilities The 60,000-acre-foot tailings disposal facility designed by Harza for the Tilden Mine in Michigan includes more than four miles of dikes with cement-bentonite slurry trench cutoffs to prevent seepage. In addition, a 16-mgd treatment plant has been constructed to treat effluent from the facility. Tilden Mine is managed by The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company. Extensive surface and ground water studies at Saltville, Virginia site formerly owned by Olin, led to design of measures to alleviate mercury contamination of the adjacent river. The remedial work included control of surface drainage, a seeded soil cover, and riprap to prevent riverbank erosion. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Vegetation Studies Wildlife Management Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology Forestry and Land Reclamation Estuarine Studies Watershed Management hysical Remote Sensing Land Use Planning Visual Impact Analyses Water Quality Air Quality Thermal Effluent Modeling FSTo)| ns) (0 (0 (13 he ee em Color] Resettlement and Colonization Social Anthropology Public Health Impacts Resource Economics Historical and Cultural Resources Recreation Planning fo rw Foes as pp fs we J) HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY a 150 South Wacker Drive + Chicago, I!linois 60606 @ System Planning and Analysis @ Environmental Studies and Reports @ Line and Tower Design @ Foundation Investigations @ Construction Management Harza's permanent staff of transmission line specialists provide system development services to investor-owned utilities and public agencies throughout the world. The cumulative experience of this group covers the complete range of transmission line voltages (from 34.5 to 765 kV) and geographic conditions from desert areas and mountain ranges to cultivated farm lands and the frozen far north. The scope of Harza transmission projects has ranged from the design of short interconnections to the analysis and upgrading of entire national systems. Harza’s size and the variety of disci- plines represented in its staff make it possible for the company to provide all of the supplemental services required for the planning, design, and construction management of environmentally accept- able transmission facilities. These disciplines, and their contribu- tion to the transmission project team, are described in greater detail in the following paragraphs. . System Planning and Analysis System planning frequently involves the social and political impli- cations of proposed expansions as well as the technical and economic aspects. As a result, engineers at Harza are experienced in working with government agencies in resolving environmental problems and in interpreting demographic and land use projections as they effect load growth and transmission line routing. Technical studies sometimes begin with economic and oper- ating studies of an entire system. In this regard, a computer program developed by Harza which is capable of simulating the hourly operation of a system under present and future conditions is invaluable in evaluating alternative expansion plans. In addition, computer generated load flow, transient stability, and short circuit studies are used to test the performance of alternative trans- mission schemes. Switching surge studies for systems incorpo- rating EHV transmission are carried out on transient network analyzers for establishment of BIL and SSL levels Planning and preliminary design studies include... 0) Generation Scheduling UO) Load Flow Analysis O System Analysis OU) Insulation Coordination 0) Economic Load Dispatch 0 Economic Conductor Selection 0 Equipment Coordination Left: Template in use during construction of tower base. Below left: Supply and access problems in mountainous areas of Iran were solved in part by use of helicopters of the Iranian Air Force. Below: A computer program used in visual impact analyses indicates by number the areas visible from preselected viewing points (the black circles in the drawing). Foundation Investigations Harza Engineers provide the appropriate degree of foundation exploration for transmission towers in all kinds of terrain. In areas where particularly poor stability conditions or foundation materials are evident, this might entail extensive exploratory drilling and testing. More commonly, however, conditions are such that pull- out tests and visual examination are utilized for application of standard footing designs for specific locations. Harza's transmission experience includes all types of support structures, including wood poles. TORS FROM 18820 FACE OF DAM SHIELD WIRE EL.198.57 , EL.1865, EL.172.51_| SWITCHYARD —= 1 765 KV CONDUCTORS FOR BANK UNITS 11, 13, 15, 17819 aN\ PULL OFF FROM POWERHOUSE VN 485M Construction Management Harza's transmission engineers and construction specialists bring many years of experience in international bidding, financing, con- struction, and operation to the construction management of transmission projects. The services provided by Harza are tailored to meet the needs of the client organization and might include some or all of the following UO Contract Document Preparation U Bid Evaluation U Contract Award Assistance U Cost Control and Cash Flow Predictions 0 Scheduling and Project Control () Purchasing and Expediting O Quality Assurance © Construction Surveillance © Acceptance Testing of Structures and Equipment C Payment Certification O Training and Initial Operation Drawing at left shows the way in which 765 kV lines from alternate units of the 10-unit Guri powerhouse will pull off from either the face of the dam or the powerhouse. SF-6 gas buses are used to make the connection to the higher-level lines. Above is a drawing of the double-circuit, 765-kV towers at Guri Current World-Wide Transmission Line Assignments (December 1977) United States Design in progress on 275 miles of 500 kV and 60 miles of 345 kV line for the Antelope Valley Project in North and South Dakota. Design of 240 miles of 345 kV line (180 miles of single circuit and 60 miles of double circuit) for the Laramie River Project in Wyo- ming and Nebraska. Comparative cost study of 115 kV and 230 kV lines on steel towers, steel poles, steel H-frames and wood poles for use in the planning and implementation of future midwest projects. Design of 230 kV line from roof of existing Mayfield hydroelectric powerhouse to switchyard requiring four different structures to cross difficult terrain. Venezuela Design of five double-circuit 765 kV lines from the 10-unit, 7,000 MVA second powerhouse of the Guri Hydroelectric Project to the switchyard. The risers to the lines will be alternately 765-kV SF-6 gas bus (5 units) and bare overhead conductors (5 units). The gas bus risers will connect to high level conductors pulling off from the face of the dam, thus providing vertical separation from the alternate lines pulling off from the powerhouse structure. Feasibility-level studies of 540 km of 400 kV line, 410 km of 230 kV line, and 140 km of 115 kV line related to the Uribante-Caparo Project. (Presently awaiting authorization to proceed with design.) Iran System studies, planning, design, and current construction man- agement for four substations and 800 km of 400 kV line through mountains and desert terrain. Pakistan A500 KV integrated national grid involving 330 miles of new trans- mission line and a new substation. These facilities are being designed to operate initially at 220 kV. El Salvador Design of 32 km of new 115 kV line and the conversion of 88 km of 69 kV line to 115 kV. Argentina-Paraguay Feasibility-level study of 1,818 km of 500 kV line and 531 km of 230 kV line related to the Yacyreta-Apipe Hydroelectric Project. (Presently awaiting authorization to proceed with design.) a project is located o smission engineers s; re available seas or in the cify the most modern 69 kV line in El Salvador to 115 kV involved a Xt Xxx Environmental Studies and Reports Harza's staff includes environmental scientists experienced in the investigations and studies necessary for the preparation of environmental reports of the type required by state and federal agencies for high voltage transmission lines. In most areas the visual impact of a transmission line is an important environmental consideration. In such cases Harza provides a combination of aesthetic design and route selection to mitigate as much as possible any adverse impacts. For transmission line routing in sensitive areas, Harza employs a computer-generated terrain analysis that indicates graphically the areas and structures that will be visible from various preselected viewing points. Other right-of-way studies include recommendations for agri- cultural utilization, the planting and maintenance of vegetation for environmental purposes, and related wildlife management pro- grams. Harza specialists are also available for expert witness testimony before federal, state and public agencies or groups. Right: Pull-out tests are the method most frequently used in determining tower footing requirements. Harza soil mechanics engineers and geol- ogists are available for investigation of areas where foundation conditions might be a problem Below: Because of the extremely steep slope on which this line is being constructed, the window in the tower is extra high to provide clearance between the center conductor and the steel of the tower base Line and Tower Design Over the years, the design of transmission lines and towers has become increasingly susceptible to computer analysis. However, a technically and economically successful design still depends upon the interpretation of data and the judgment of electrical and structural engineers experienced in transmission line design. Harza designers bring to the task a collective background encom- passing a wide range of climatic, geographic, and system require- ments Included in Harza’s transmission design services are... U Final Route Selection 0 Plan and Profile Preparation UO Sag-Tension Computations 0) Conductor and Hardware Selection UO) Insulation Coordination C Clipping Offset Determinations C Radio-TV Interference and Audible Noise Suppression CO) Mechanical Load Determinations O Design of Structures UC Materials Specifications 0 Construction Drawings and Specifications EL 272 765 KV CO UNITS 12, PULL OUT | camea| ! ARRESTER. EL. 168 .....-SF-6 GAS BUS RISER I 1 i +805 MVA TRANSFO eT 700 MVA GENERATOR (10 UNITS) Above: A 230 kV line in Washington state during construction Left: In the mountains of Iran, helicopters were used extensively in tower construction. Here, concrete for footings is being delivered to a tower site. Below: This 115-kilometer-long, 230-kV line in Iceland is designed for some of the most severe combined wind and ice conditions of any Harza transmission project. ENGINEERING COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 150 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 + Tel. (312) 855-7000 - Cable: HARZENG CHICAGO - Telex 25-3540 _ Worldwide services through Harza Engineering Company International and Harza Overseas Engineering Company. oa PROJECT Wastewater Treatment Alternatives Havana Station Ash Storage Project Rim Basin Pumped~ Storage Project Duquesne Hydro~ electric Appraisal Evaluation of Hydro Potential Lake Michigan Landfill Slag Field Expansion, Kincaid Station Jim Falls Hydro Redevelopment Scarp Mardan Bear River Hydro Site Study Byron Station Augmentation Reservoir Study Tlingit-Haida Hydropower Study Ak Chin Indian Reservation Red Sea-Dead Sea Hydro study LOCATION Wisconsin, U.S.A. Illinois, U.S.A. Colorado, U.S.A. Pennsylvania, UsSeA. Irian Java, Indonesia Indiana, U.S.A. Tllinois, U.S.A. Chippewa River, Wisconsin, U.S.A. Pakistan Petoskey, Michigan, UeSeAe Illinois, U.S.A. Black Bear Lake and Gunnuk Creek, Alaska, U.S.A Arizona, U.SsA. Red Sea and Dead Sea, Jordan PREFEASIGILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS TYPE INITIAL oF POWER stupy’/ om) P - Fe - P 250 (Ultimate 500) P - P 18 Fe - FA - Fe 45- 50 Fe - P 0.4 Pi - P, Fe varied P, Fe, -Fi - INITIAL IRRIGATION (HECTARES) 48,560 (actual) (potential) 6,770 OTHER Storage Basin Landfill Slag Disposal Drainage Storage water Supply ESTIMATED cones $ MILLIONS: Unknown at date Unknown at date Unknown at date Not Applicable 32 136.0 Subject to Government Regulation Unknown at date 200 1017 70- 90 7 870 CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Illinois Power Resources Services Water and Power Resources Services Duquesne Light Company Freeport, Indonesia Northern Indiana Public Service Company Commonwealth Edison Company Northern States Power Company Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) EG & G Idaho Incorporated Commonwealth Edison Company Alaska Power Authority Bureau of Indian Affaire/Franzoy and Corey Jordan Valley Authority 1980 1980 1979 U/T 1979 1979 1979 1979 1979 1979 1979 & Page 1 of 18 HARZA PROJECT Nam Mun, Report Update Power Plant/ Quarry Siting Two Hydroelectric Plant sites World Bank Mission Participation Water Resource Study Expansion of Five St. Joseph River Hydro Plants Brazil Pumped ~ Storage Primavera Cipo Hills Southwest Facility Planning Study Susquehanna River Dam Fishway Study Raising Lake Vermilion Mossyrock TYPE OF LOCATION sup’ Thailand Fe Northern Indiana, Pe U.S.Ae South Dakota, P UsSeAe Magat and Pampanga Pp Rivers, Central Luzon, Philippines Haiti Fe St. Joseph Fe River, Indiana and Michigan, U.S.A. Near Recife and Belo P Horizonte, Brazil Minneapolis, P, Fe Minnesota, U.S.A. Susquehanna River, Fe Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Lake Vermilion, Fe Danville, Illinois, U.S.A. Tacoma, Washington, Fe UsSeAe HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED INITIAL INITIAL CONSTRUGTION POWER IRRIGATION 0: (aw) (HECTARES OTHER $ MILLIONS - 20,000 - 83 1,000- - Low Flow Unknown at 1,500 Augmentation date 0.4~and - - 2.27 0.3-0.5 = = Soil 42.0 Conservation - = - Not Applicable varied - - - 1,000 and . - - 900 2,000 * - Wastewater Not Management Applicable - Fishway 44.9 Construction - Raising Lake 0.15 Level by 5 feet for water supply. - - Modification 0.02 of low level outlet valve FINANCIAL STUDIES and associated inlet. CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Royal Irrigation Department, Thailand Northern Indiana Public Service Company Homestake Mining Company World Bank United States Agency for International Development. American Electric Power Service Corp. Centrais Electricas Brasileiras S/N’ (ELECTROBRAS) Metropolitan waste Control Commission (cc) Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Inter ‘State water Company City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities oF 1979 = 1979 1978 1978 1978 1978 Expansions found unfeasible. 1978 1978 1978 1978 - 1978 Page 2 of 18 poo HARZA PROJECT Sullivan Lake Report Update Reservoir Siting Cuffs Run Powell Mountain Pumped-Storage Itapeuara Hydroelectric Project Brumley Gap Pumped-Storage Kanawha and Gauley River Basins Kootenai River Hydroelectric Project Bl Nispero ENEE System Expansion LOCATION Sallivan Creek and Sullivan Lake, Washington, UseS-A. Susquehanna River, Maryland and Pennsylvania, UsSeA- Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. South Fork Powell River, Virginia, UseS-Ae Jari River, Brazil Brumley Creek, Virginia, U.S.A. Gauley and Kanawha Rivers, West Virginia, U.S.A. Kootenai River, Montana, U.S.A. Palaja River, Honduras Honduras HARZA PREFEASISILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED TYPE INTTIAG INITIAL CONSTRUGTION oF y POWER IRRIGATION cos: sTupy~ i) (HECTARES) OTHER $_MILLIONS Fe 18 - 20.0 P - Low Flow 100 Augmentation P 800 Low Flow 300 Augmentation P 3,000 - 1,500 P, Fe 280 - 180 Fe 3,000 - 1,500 P 1,650 Environ- 550-650 mental Appraisal Fe 140 Environ- 110.0 mental studies Fe, Fi 22.5 - 20.0 Fe - - 15.0 CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille Company Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Appalachian Power Company (Subsidiary of American Electric Power Company) Universe Tank Ships, Inc. Appalachian Power Company (Subsidiary of American Electric Power Company) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District Northern Lights, Inc., and Others Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica YEAR OF srupy2/ REMARKS 1978 - 1978 - 97800 1979 - 1978 = 1979 - w/t - 1979 1978 In association with J. A. Levell 1977 In association with Reyes y Asociados, Tegucigalpa, Honduras 1977 In association with Reyes y Asociados, Tegucigalpa, Honduras Page 3 of 18 HARZA PROJECT El Remolino lake Andes-Wagner Quimistan Valley Sula Valley Puyango-Tumbes Black Bush/Block III Frontlands Qattara Project Reviged Action Programe and National Investment. Schedule for Irrigation Farming Development HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED ‘TYPE INITIAL INITIAL CONSTRUCTION or POWER IRRIGATION oo: LOCATION stupy~ aw) (HECTARES) OTHER $ MILLIONS Comayagua River, P 120 - - 78.0 Honduras South Dakota, Fe, Fe - 32,000 - . 86.3 UsSeAe Quimistan Valley, Fe - 3,000 Groundwater 5.0 Honduras Drainage Sula Valley, P, Fe - Flood Control 30.0 Honduras Drainage Peru and Ecuador P a7 140,000 - 600.0 Guyana, South Fe - 18,000 Drainage 32.8 America Reclamation Qattara Depression, Fe 2,000- - Ecological 2,000.0 Egypt 3,000 and Clima- Pumped- tological Storages Studies 600 Conven~ tional Indus Basin Fe, Fi - 12,000,000 Drainage, 2,000.0 and Baluchistan Reclamation, Areas, Pakistan Flood Control, Groundwater Development CLIENT _AND/OR_OWNER Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Benjamin, Kasl and Associates Ministry of Natural Resources Ministry of Public Works Comision Mixta Ecuatoriano-Peruana Ministry of Agriculture General Egyptian Electricity Corporation International Bank for Reconstruction and Development YEAR OF srupy?/ 1978 1978 1978 1978 1976: 1978 1977 1980 1975- 1978 REMARKS In association with Reyes y Asociados, Tegucigalpa, Honduras In association with Consultores en Ingenieria, S.A. de C.V. (CINSA) In association with Consultores en Ingenieria, S.A. de C.V. (CINSA) In association with INCONEC~CIMENTACIONES~ Ipco, Quito Ecuador and BUSTAMANTE, WILLIAMS ¥ ASOCIADOS- MOTLIMA CONSULTORES Lima 1, Peru In association with Aubrey Barker Associates, Georgetown, Guyana Harza's client is Lahmeyer International GmbH of Germany Page 4 of 18 HARZA PROJECT Jordan Valley Irrigation Project - Stage II Bay of Fundy Tidal Power Studies Souris River Flood Control Project Black River - Upper Morass Study Black Bush/Block III Front Lands Tavera-Lopez Project Bao Project Uribante-Caparo Hydroelectric Project Lower Susquehanna River Powerplant LOCATION Yarmouk and Zarqa Rivers, Jordan Canada Souris River, North Dakota U.S.Ae Black River - Upper Morass Area, Jamaica Guyana, South America Dominican Republic Dominican Republic Venezuela New York, U.S.A. oF srupy/ Fe, Fi Fe Fe Fe, Fi Pe Fe P, Fe, Fi HARZA, PREFEASISILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS INITIAL INITIAL POWER IRRIGATION oe) SHECTARES) 30 36,000 1,085, - 1,550, ana 3,800 - 11,000 - 18,000 118 - 1,320 - 1,650 - Existing; 350 Expansion OTHER Flood Control Flood Control Drainage Drainage Reclamation Water Supply ESTIMATED CONSTRUGTION cost $ MILLIONS 400.0 In Excess of 1,000.0 85.0 25.0 32.8 79.7 35.0 1,160.0 102.0 CLIENT _AND/OR_OWNER Jordan Valley Authority Governments of Canada and the Provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District Project Development and Review Division, Ministry of Finance, Government of Jamaica Ministry of Agriculture Corporacion Dominicana de Electricidad (CDE) Corporacion Dominicana de Electricidad (CDE) C. A. de Administracion y Fomento Electrico Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation oF srupy’ 1977 1976- 1977 1978 1977 1977 1978 1976 1976 1975- 1977 REMARKS In association with Dar Al-Handasah of Lebanon and Consulting Engineering Center of Jordan In association with Tidal Power Consultants Limited In association with Hue Lyew Chin of Ringston, Jamaica In‘ association with Aubrey Barker Associates, Georgetown, Guyana In association with OTEHA C.A.; Lima y Rodriguez Soto SeAes Tecnicos Consultores, S.ReLey Harza de Venezuela Page 5 of 18 PROJECT Energy Resources ‘Treatment Develop- ment, Yellowstone River Basin Electric Power Long Range Planning study Sogamoso Hydro-~ electric Development Pumped-Storage Site Studies Water Resources Study for Bauxite Complex Pollution Abatement: Chicago Sanitary ana ship Canal Arkansas River Chloride Control Project Chimbo Hydroelectric Project San Lorenzo and 5 de Noviembre Projects Tilden Life- of-Mines Disposal LOCATION Yellowstone River Basin, Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming U.S.A. North Sumatra, Indonesia Rio Sogamoso, Colombia Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, UsSsAy Guinea, West Africa Illinois, U.S.A. Arkansas River, Oklahoma, U.S.A. Chimbo River, Ecuador Rio Lempa, El Salvador Michigan, U.S.A. HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS TYPE INITIAL INITIAL OF POWER IRRIGATION stub (aw) (HECTARES) P - - Fe - = Fe 1,700 Pp Up - to 1,500 P - - P - - P - - Pe 460 a P, Fe, Fi 180 - Fe - - ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION co! OTHER $ MILLIONS Resources Not Survey Applicable - Not Available 10,0002/ 880.0 - 500.0 Water 3.0 ‘Supply Pollution Wot Abatement Applicable Pollution Not Abatement © Applicable - 34961 Fishery 150.0 Resource Survey Mine 100.0 Tailings Disposal GLTENT_AND/OR_ OWNER Missouri River Basin Commission Perusahaan Umum Listrik Negara (PLN) Interconexion Electrica S.A. (ISA) Power Supply Task Force Wisconsin and Michigan System Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee (HALCO Mining) Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulea District Junta Nacional de Planificacion y Coordinacion Economica and Instituto Ecuatoriano de Blectrificacion Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) The Cleveland-Clifes Iron Company YEAR OF a/ srupy=" 1976 1976 1976 1975- 1976 1975~ “976 1975- 1976 1975- 1976 1975- 1976 1974- 1976 1975 In association with Hidroestudios, Ltda. In association with Consorcio INTEGRAL- IDCO-ADEC of Quito In association with Atilio Garcia Prieto and Cia. Page 6 of 18 HARZA PREFEASISILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED ‘TYPE INITIAG INITIAL ConsmnuggroN YEAR oO POWER IRRIGATION cos OF 4 PROJECT LOCATION srupy~ (sa) (HECTARES) OTHER $ MILLIONS CLIENT _AND/OR OWNER srupy>’ REMARKS Upper Mazaruni Guyana P 3,100 - Environ- 484.0 The Government of Guyana, 1975 Project mental Ministry of Energy “ Appraisal Buffalo Metro- New York, U.S.A. Fe - - Water 5.1 U.Se Army Corps of 1975 - politan . Related Engineers, Buffalo Recreation; District Fish and Wildlife Resources; Streaabank Stabilization Water Related Environmental Quality Management Sultartangi Iceland Fe 150 - - 80.0 Landsvirkjun, The 1975 In association with National Power Co. Thoroddsen & Partners Corpus Project Parana River, P 2,300 Not Yet Navigation; 3,000.0 Comision Mixta 1975 Consorcio composed of Argentina and to Determined Fish Paraguayo-Argentina Lahmeyer International Paraguay 9,200 del Rio Parana GmbH (Lead Firm); Harza Engineering _ Company, U.SsA.7 Consorcio Corpus (consisting of four Argentina firms), Argentina; Consorcio Itacua (consisting of 7 Paraguayan firms plus 9 individuals) Paraguay Kabul Studies Afghanistan Fe 20-50 - See Remarks 7.0 Owner: Da Afghanistan 1975 40-MW of gas turbine Alternative Breshna Moassessa (DAEM) capacity recommended Hydro Plants Harza's Client: Inter~ to meet immediate needs. national Bank for A water management Reconstruction and program necessary before Development decision on hydro. Magpie, Canada Fe 5 - - 30.7 Great Lakes Power 1975 - Steephill Falls 30 Company, Ltd. Dam and Thirds 20 Falls Project Eastern Honduras Honduras P 1,500~ - - - Empresa Nacional de 1975 - Hydro Survey 2,000 Energia Electrica Page 7 of 18 PROJECT CEL system Expansion Planning Study Illinois Pumped - Storage Study Catlin Mine Soo Generation Studies Powder River Development Studies Underground Hydroelectric Pumped-Storage Electric System Management and Long Range Planning Services Northside Development Project Rio Lindo Expansion Zanja del Tigre Dam, Power and Irrigation LOCATION El Salvador Illinois, U.S.A. Catlin, Illinois U.S.A. Canada Powder River, Wyoming, U.S.A. South Beloit, Tllinois, U.S.A. Korea Washington, U.S.A. Honduras Argentina ‘TYPE Fe Fe Fe, Fi Fe, Fi Fe, Fi HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED INITIAL INITIAG CONSTRUGION POWER IRRIGATION co: (sa) (HECTARES) OTHER $_ MILLIONS 200-1,000 - - 450.0 1,000- - - 300.0 2,000 to 600.0 - - water 7.9 Supply 30 - - 20.7 - - Municipal 10.0 and Indus- to trial water 25.0 Supply 2,000- - - 500.0 3,000 - - - Not Applicable 1,000-Mw - Recreation 480.0 Pumped- Fish and Storage; Wildlife 1,200-mw Conservation 40 - - 35.0 468 100,000 - 232.0 CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa Illinois Power Company Amax Coal Company Great Lakes Power Company, Ltd. State of wyoming, State Engineers Office Commonwealth Edison Company Economic Planning Board Mid-Columbia Economic Development District Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Comision Nacional de la Cuenca del Plata YEAR oF stupy2/ 1975 1975, 1975, 1974 1974 1974 1974 1974 1974 1974 REMARKS) In association with Ing. Atilio Garcia Prieto and Cia., San Salvador, 1 Salvador In association with Sanderson and Porter, New York Nuclear Services Corp. is S/C to Harza In association with Analisis y Desarrollo Economico (ADE) and Cuyum SATC Page 8 of 18 PROJECT Uribante-Caparo Hydroelectric Project Interim Master Plan Travenol Laboratories Mayfield Power Station Expansion Studies Mount Hope Pumped-Storage and/or Compressed Air Storage Smith Mountain, Added Unit Betania Multi- Purpose Development New York Off-Shore Airport Sampean-Baru Water Treatment Plant Improvements Yacyreta-Apipe Hydroeletric Project LOCATION Venezuela Thjorsa, Iceland North Carolina, U.S.A. Washington, U.S.A. New Jersey, U.S.A. Virginia, U.S.A. Colombia New York, U.S.A. Indonesia Michigan, U.S.A. Argentina & Paraguay HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED TYPE INITIAL INITIAL CONSTRUGTION oO yy POWER IRRIGATION cosT sTupy~ (mw) (HECTARES ) OTHER $ MILLIONS P 1,660 15,000 - 400.0 P 100 - - Not Applicable Fe - - Flood Not Control Applicable Fe, Fi Ada - - Ps) 40.5 Fe 1,000 - - 200.0 Fe 100 - - Not Applicable P 618 5,000 water 29.0 Fe Supply, Flood Control Fe - - Airport 10,000.0 Fe - 15,000 - 10.8 Fe - - water 0.2 Supply Fe, Fi 4,050 140,000 - 1,000.0 CLIENT AND/OR_ OWNER C.A. de Administracion y Fomento Electrica Landsvirkjun, The National Power Company Baxter Laboratories The City of Tacoma, Washington Jersey Central Power and Light Company American Electric Power Service Corporation Instituto Colombiano de Energia Electrica Saphier, Lerner Schindler; for the Federal Aviation Administration Directorate General of water Resources Development City of Ann Arbor, Michigan Comision Mixta Tecnica Paraguayo-Argentina de Yacyreta-Apipe 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1975 1973 1973 1973 1973 REMARKS In association with OTEHA C.A.; Lima y Rodriguez Soto S.A.; Tecnicos Consultores, S.R.L.; Harza de Venezuela In association with SEDIC Ltda. In association with Netherlands Engineering Consultants (NEDECO) In association with Agrar and Hydrotechnik GmbH; Essen, Germany In association with Lahmeyer International (Germany)- Analisis y Desarrollo Economico, A.D.E., (Argentina); Yacyreta Consultores Asociados (Paraguay); and Cuyum SATC (Argentina). Page 9 of 18 HARZA PROJECT Black Bush & Tapakuma Rio Patia Stony Creek Pumped-Storage Power Project Bath County Pumped-Storage Project Santa Cruz System Expansion study Andrews (Lower Falls) Generating Station, 3rd Unit Railroad Alignment Underground and Surface Pumped~ Storage Alternatives & Transmission Line Blue Mountain Rio Caroni Guayabo Dam Raising and Powerplant Expansion Pekalen-Sampean Rehabilitation LOCATION Guyana Colombia Pennsylvania, UsSeAe Back Creek, Virginia, U.S.A. Bolivia Canada Kentucky, U.S.A. Maryland, U.S.A. Kingston, Jamaica Venezuela El Salvador Indonesia TYPE OF stupy/ Fe, Fi Fe, Fi Fe Fe, Fi Fe Fe Fe Fe, Fi Fe HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS INITIAL INITIAL POWER IRRIGATION (mw) (HECTARES) -— 70,000 1,200 - 1,710 - 2, 100 - 22.5 - 1-2,000 - 10 1,600 2,850 - - 200,000 SrSeR Recreation ‘Transpor- tation water Supply ESTIMATED CONSTRUGFION co: $ MILLIONS 30.0 235.0 250.0 469.0 4.6 4.0 Approx. 300.0 per site 105.0 12.0 CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Ministry of Economic Development Instituto Colombiano Pennsylvania Power & Light and Metropolitan Edison Company Virginia Electric and Power Company Empresa Nacional de Electricidad (ENDE) Great Lakes Power Company, Ltd. American Electric Power Service Corporation Potomac Electric Power Company The Water Commission, Government of Jamaica Corporacion Venezolana @e Guayana Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEU) Directorate General of water Resources Development oF 3, 1973 1973 1973 1972- 1973 1972 1972 1972 1972 1972 1972 1971 1971 REMARKS In association with Aubrey Barker Associates In association with Hidroestudios, Ltda. In association with Hue Lyew Chin Engineers, Kingston In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto. Page 10 of 18 PROJECT Rio Patia Blue Mountain Northern Guatemala Resources Study NASA Transonic Wing Tunnel - Pumped-Storage , Hydraulic Turbine Wellston 15-mi. Coal Conveyor System Rio Grande San Jacinto & Sola Hrauneyjafoss Indonesia Irrigation Rehabilitation Series C Project Groundwater Development Thailand Irrigation Underground Pumped-Storage LOCATION Colombia Kingston, Jamaica Guatemala Virginia, U.S.A. Ohio, U.S.A. Bolivia Tarija, Bolivia Iceland East Java, Indonesia Indonesia Nam Mun and Nam Chi Basins, Thailand Vicinity of Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. TYPE Fe Fe Fe Fe, Fi Fe Fe HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS. INITIAL INITIAL POWER IRRIGATION oH) AEBCTARES) 1,000 - 10 1,600 To 200 20,000 50-200 - 2-3 200-400 160 - 209,000 - 5-10 48,000 1,000 Up - CONSTRUCTION OTHER Water Supply Municipal & Ind. water Supply, Flood Control Two 275,000~ hp fans; one 250,000-hp air compressor Steam Plant Coal Supply 250,000 h. Study water Supply ESTIMATED cos' $ MILLTONS: 105.0 75.5 10.0 65.0 1.8 31.0 13.7 27.0 39.0 CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Instituto Colombiano Energia Electrica The Water Commission, Government of Jamaica National Economic Planning Council U.S. National Aeronautics & Space Administration American Electric Power Service Corporation Empresa Nacional de Electricidad Empresa Nacional de Electricidad Landsvirkjun, The National Power Company Directorate General of Water Resources Development. Directorate General of Water Resources Development U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Commonwealth Edison Company OF srupye/ 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1970 1970 1970 REMARKS In association with Hidroestudios, Ltda. In association with Hue Lyew Chin Engineers, Kingston In association with Louis Berger, Inc. In association with Consultores Galindo, Ltd. In association with Consultores Galindo, Ltd. In association with Thoroddsen & Partners. Page 11 of 18 HARZA__ PROJECT Medan Electric System Rehabili- tation and Expansion Indonesia Irrigation Rehabilitation- Series B Project Indonesia Irrigation Rehabilitation Series A Project CEL System Expansion Montezuma Pumped- Storage Kalayaan and Paete Pumped-Storage Lake Havasu Pumped-Storage Southern Bolivia Power Development Water Use in Montgomery County Chicago Deep- Tunnel, Zone 1 Reza Shah Kabir Dam and Gotvand Irrigation Reza Shah Kabir Dam and Gotvand Irrigation LOCATION Indonesia Sulawezi & Java Sumatra & Java San Salvador, El Salvador Gila Indian Reservation, Arizona, U.S.A. Laguna de Bay, Philippines Arizona, U.S.A. Bolivia Maryland, U.S.A. Chicago, Illinois, UsS+Ae Karun River, Iran Karun River, Iran TYPE oF STUD’ yl/ Fe, Fe, Fe, Fi Fi Fi Fe, Fi Fe Fe Fe, Fi HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS INITIAL INITIAL POWER IRRIGATION (aw) (HECTARES) OTHER 24 - - - 202,000 - - 202,000 - 33 - - 500 - S 350-1050 - e 250-1000 - - 2-40 - - 2,000 500 - Flood Control 500 42,000 - 500 42,000 - Recreation, Navigation ESTIMATED CONSTRUGTION cost™ $ MILLIONS 15.0 17.4 20.6 7.0 72.0 86.5 103.5 68.5 84.0 165.0 165.0 CLIENT _AND/OR_OWNER Perusahaan Umum Listrik Negara (PLN) Directorate General of Water Resources Development Directorate General of Water Resources Development Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) Arizona Power Authority Manila Electric Company Arizona Power Authority Empresa Nacional de Electricidad State of Maryland Plan. Dept. and Maryland- National Capital Park & Planning Commission Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. of Greater Chicago Khuzestan Water and Power Authority Khuzestan Water and Power Authority YEAR oF stupy/ 1970 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1968 1968 1967 REMARKS In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto In association with Consultores Galindo, Ltda. In association with Bauer Engineering, Inc. In association with F. & H.R. Farman- Farmaian In association with F. & H.R. Farman- Parmaian Page 12 of 18 PROJECT Nader Shah Dam Rio Lindo Cerron Grande Poza del Silencio Olomega Pisayambo Lake Yojoa Diversions La Fortuna Lake Michigan Airport Hydroelectric Resources in Western Honduras Finchaa Mayfair Pumping Station, Discharge Piping & Pressure Tunnel LOCATION Marun River, Iran Rio Lindo, Honduras Rio Lempa, El Salvador El Salvador Rio San Miguel, El Salvador Andean Highlands, Ecuador Yure & Tepemechin River, Honduras Rio Chiriqui, Panama Chicago, Illinois, UsS+Ae Honduras Finchaa River, Ethiopia Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. TYPE oF Fe, Fe, Fe, Fe, Fe, Fe, supe Fi Fi Fi Fi Fi Fi HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED INITIAL INITIAL CONSTRUGTION POWER IRRIGATION oo! ow) (HECTARES) OTHER $ MILLIONS 25 55,000 water 45.0 Supply 40 - - 16.0 135 - Flood 80.0 Control 55-143 - Flood - Control, Fishing - 9,000 Conser~ 10.0 vation & Drainage 140 21,000 - 37.0 - - Water Supply - Augmentation for Power 30-125 - - - - - Municipal - Airport 12-280 - - - 67 - - 28.0 - - Municipal - water Supply CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Khuzestan Water and Power Authority Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica (ENEE) Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock Junta Nacional de Plani-~ ficacion y Coordinacion Economica Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Empresas Electricas de Chiriqui City of Chicago Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Department of water Resources, Min. Pub. Wks. & Comm. City of Chicago 1967 1967 1967 1967 1967 1967 1967 1967 1967 1966 1966 In assoc: F. & H.R. Farmaian In assoc: dation with . Farman- iation with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto Page 13 of 18 HARZA PROJECT Lake Edisto Chicago Deep Tunnel, Zone I Poza del Silencio, Site Selection Olomega Acajutla Steam Plant, Unit 2 Brookville Pumped-Storage Alternatives for Electric Power Development, Rio Dulce (Rio Hondo Power Plant) Tachia River, Sun Moon Lake Montezuma Pumped- Storage Lower Tachien” San Buenaventura Transmission Intertie LOCATION Orangeburg, S. Carolina, U.S.A. Chicago, Illinois, U.S.Ae El Salvador Rio San Miguel, El Salvador Acajutla, El Salvador E. Fork, White River, Indiana, U.SsA. Guatemala Rio Dulce, Argentina ‘Taiwan Gila Indian Reservation, Arizona, UsSeA. Tachia River, Taiwan Lago Yojoa, Rio Lindo, Honduras El Salvador & Honduras TYPE OF stupy// P Fe, Fi Fe Fi Fe, Fi Fe Fe, Fi Fe HARZA, PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS INITIAL POWER (mw) 300-2,000 30 328 60 12 100-400 400-500 360 38 INITIAL IRRIGATION (HECTARES) 118,000 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION cos OTHER $ MILLIONS Recreation - Supply Flood & bad Pollution Control - 6.0 - 25.0 - 13.0 - 78.0 - 47.0 = 13.5 - 4.0 CLIENT _AND/OR OWNER Steering Committee, Orangeburg, S. Carolina Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. of Greater Chicago Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) Public Service Indiana Instituto Nacional de Electrificacion Agua y Energia Electrica Taiwan Power Company Arizona Power Authority ‘Taiwan Power Company Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica (ENEE) CEL - ENEE YEAR OF srupy?/ 1966 1966 1966 1966 1965, 1965 1965 1965 1965 1965 1964 1964 1964 REMARKS In association with Bauer Engineering, Inc. In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto and Sargent & Lundy, engineers Under subcontract to Sargent & Lundy, engineers Financial study of alternative plans of other engineers Engineering responsi~ bilities were shared with client's engineers. Page 14 of 18 HARZA PREFEASISILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS: ESTIMATED TYPE INITIAL INITIAL CONSTRUGTION OF vy POWER IRRIGATION cos™ PROJECT LOCATION stub (aa) (HECTARES) OTHER $ MILLIONS CLIENT AND/OR OWNER REMARKS Improved Methods Mississippi Fe - - Flood - U.S. Army Waterways 1964 - for Riverbanks River, U.S.A. Control Experiment Station, Stabilization Vicksburg Riceland Reclamation Coastal Area, Fe - 15,000 - 32.0 U.S. Agency for Interna~ 1964 - (four separate Guinea tional Development reports: Monchon, Kapatchez, Koba, and Kakossa Projects). Lake Ilopango El Salvador P 10-20 - - - Comision Ejecutiva 1964 In association with Hidroelectrica del Rio Ing. A. Garcia Prieto Lempa Agus River Power Philippines P 37-138 - Lake Regu- - National Power Corporation 1964 In association with Development lation, Engineering and Power Storage Development Corporation of the Philippines 5 de Noviembre Rio Lempa, Fe 21 - - 1.5 Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1963 In association with Sth Unit El Salvador electrica del Rio Lempa Ing. A. Garcia Prieto Dettifoss Jokulsa River, Fe 133 - - 25.0 Landsvirkjun, The National 1963 - Iceland Power Company Regional Transp. Tacuarembo- Fe - 3,500 Highway 20.0 Ministry of Public Works 1963 In association with Plan & Zapucay Rivera, Transp. Ing. Luis A. Mondino Pilot Irrigation Uruguay Burfell Thjorsa River, Fe 105 - - 35.0 Landsvirkjun, The National 1963 - Iceland Power Company Merrimac Pumped- Wisconsin, U.S.A. P 500-1,000 - - - Wisconsin Power & Light 1963 Under subcontract to Storage Company Sargent & Lundy, Engrs. Northern Illinois Illinois, U.S.A. P 300-500 - - - Commonwealth Edison Company 1963 Under subcontract to Pumped-Storage Sargent & Lundy, Engrs. Regional Transp. Tacuarembo- P - - - - Ministry of Public Works 1962 In association with Plan & Zapucay Rivera, Uruguay Ing. Luis A. Mondino Pilot Irrigation Amistad Power Plant Rio Grande, Texas, Fe 32 - - 19.0 International Boundary and 1962 - U.S.A. Water Comm., U.S.- Mexico Arghandab Power Arghandab Fe 13.6 - - 5.0 U.S. Agency for Inter- 1962 - Plant River, Afghanistan national Development Page 15 of 18 PROJECT Yarmouk-Jordan, Stage I Guri Madhya Pradesh Rios Torola & Sonsonate Amistad Power Plant Amistad Power Plant Mossyrock Burfell Guri Wanapum Marble Canyon Pearl River Marble Canyon LOCATION Yarmouk and Jordan Rivers, Jordan Rio Caroni, Venezuela India El Salvador Rio Grande, Texas, U.S.A. Rio Grande, Texas, U.S.A. Cowlitz River, Washington, U.S.A. Thjorsa River, Iceland Rio Caroni, Venezuela Columbia River, Washington, U.S.A. Colorado River, Arizona, U.S.A. Pearl River, Mississippi, U.S.A. Colorado River, Arizona, U.S.A. TYPE oF stupy’/ Fe Fe, Fi Fe Fe Fe Fe, Fi Fe, Fi Fe, Fi HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS INITIAL INITIAL POWER IRRIGATION (ow) (HECTARES) OTHER - 11,000 - 527 - - - - Paper Mill water Supply 30-75 - es 32 - - 32 - - 300 - Flood Control, Recreation 6,000 - - 831 - Flood Control 340 - - - water Supply, Recreation ESTIMATED Ca $ MILLIONS 109.0 117.0 19.0 19.0 75.0 118.0 110.0 6.6 CLIENT AND/OR OWNER East Ghor Canal Authority Corporacion Venezolana de Guayana Orient Paper Mills, Ltd. Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa International Boundary and Water Comm., U.S.- Mexico International Boundary and Water Comm., U.S.- Mexico City of Tacoma, Washington Landsvirkjun, The National Power Company Corporacion Venezolana de Guayana Public Utility District of Grant County Arizona Power Authority Pearl River Valley Water Supply District Arizona Power Authority suv’ 1962 1962 1962 1962 1961 1961 1960 1960 1959 1959 1959 1958 (REMARKS! In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto In association with Lester Engineering Company Page 16 of 18 HARZA ao PROJECT Guajoyo and 5 de Noviembre, 4th Unit Markland Power Plant Hydroelectric Power Resources Colorado River Development Diversion Canaveral Canaveral Little Goose Inga Boulder Creek Karadj Yarmouk-Jordan, Stage I Priest Rapids Study of Electric Power in Central Region LOCATION Rio Desague, El Salvador Ohio River, Indiana, U.S.A. Panama Arizona, U.S.A. Lago Yojoa, Rio Lindo, Honduras Lago Yojoa, Rio Lindo, Honduras Snake River, Washington, U.S.A Congo River, Congo Boulder Creek, Utah, U.S.A. Karadj River, Iran Yarmouk and Jordan Rivers, Jordan Columbia River, Washington, U.S.A. Guatemala Fe, Fi Fe, Fi Fe, Fi HARZA PREPEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED INITIAL INITIAL ConsPRUGZION POWER IRRIGATION co: (met) (HECTARES) OTHER $ MILLIONS 15 - - 4.4 ea. 65 - - 15.0 7-133 - = a - Not Municipal - Avail. Water Supply 29 - - 13.0 35-168 - - a 270 - Navigation - 500-1,600 - - - 4 = - 1.5 80 - Municipal 58.0 Water Supply 789 - Flood 113.0 Control 3-40 - = = CLIENT AND/OR OWNER Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc. Servicio Cooperativo Interamericano de Fomento Economico Arizona Power Authority & Arizona Interstate Stream Commission Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica (ENEE) Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica (ENEE) Inland Power & Light Co. Ministry of Colonies, Belgium Garkane Power Assn., Inc. Iran Plan Organization East Ghor Canal Authority Public Utility District of Grant County, Washington Ministerio de Comunicaciones y Obras Publicas 3 sre 1958 1958 1958 1958 1957 1957 1957 1957 1956 1956 1955 1955 1955 REMARES) In association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto S/C to Sargent & Lundy Chicago, Illinois In association with COMINIERE, Brussels In association with Michael Baker, Jr., Inc. Page 17 of 18 PROJECT Brokopondo Derbendi Khan Bekhme Box Canyon Ambuklao Mayfield 5 de Noviembre (Guayabo) TYPE oF Vv LOCATION sTuDY— Surinam River, Fe Surinam Diyala River, Fe Iraq Greater Zab, Iraq Fe Pend Oreille River, Fe, Fi Washington, U.S.A. Agno River, Fe Philippines Cowlitz River, Washington, U.S.A. Fe Rio Lempa, Fe, Fi El Salvador HARZA PREFEASIBILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND FINANCIAL STUDIES PROJECTION FUNCTIONS ESTIMATED INITIAL INITIAL CONSTRUS POWER IRRIGATION Co: (Mw) (HECTARES) OTHER _$.MILLIONS 125 - - 45.0 2 375,000 Flood 61.0 Control (Future) 1,650,000 Flood 61.0 Control 67 - - 16.0 75 - ~ 55.0 - 44.0 120 - 30 - - 17.0 d/ P = Prefeasibility - Fe = Feasibility - Fi = Financial CLIENT _AND/OR OWNER Brokopondo-Bureau, Surinam Aluminum Co. (ALCOA) Iraq Development Board Iraq Development Board Public Utility District of Pend Oreille County, Washington National Power Corp. City of Tacoma Washington Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 2/ Construction cost is omitted on prefeasibility report entries where a wide range of possible projects was studied. 3/ U/I (19--) = Under investigation, report scheduled 19--. 4/ On Lower Tachien Project Harza shared engineering study responsibilities with client engineers. 5/ The feasibility report was issued by the Bureau of Reclamation, based on studies and designs provided by Harza. §/ On the Derbendi Khan Project power listed is for station service only. Design of water conductors is for a future addition of 75-MW. 2/ The potential for development of 10,000 to 200,000 hectares of irrigation was identified as part of the feasibility study of the hydroelectric project. May 1980 60. STU 1 YEAR oF stupy2/ 1954 1954 1953 1951 1951 1949 1947 Page 18 of 18 HARZA NAME oF PROJECT Black Bear Lake Jim Falls Hydro Redevelop- ment Boundary Addition Sullivan Creek Raystown Brumley Gap Mayfield 4th Unit Bath County Pumped-Storage Cornell Hydro Plant Redevelopment. Kootenai River Mount Hope Pumped-Storage Stony Creek Pumped-Storage Montezuma Pumped-Storage Seneca Pumped-Storage Havasu Pumped-Storage EXPERIENCE IN APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE FEDERAL REGULATORY COMMISSION YEAR INITIAL INITIAL OPERATION OR CAPACITY (MOST RECENT LOCATION QUNER/APPLICANT om) STATUS ‘HARZA SERVICES) Alaska Alaska Power Authority 6 In Progress Current Wisconsin Northern States Power 45 In Progress Current Washington City of Seattle 392 In Progress Current City Light Department Washington Public Utility District 16 In Progress 1983 No. 1 of Pend Oreille County Pennsylvania GPU Service Corp. 20.3 Application Submitted to FERC 1980 March 1980 Virginia Appalachian Power Company 3000 Temporarily halted. Temporarily Halted (subsidiary of American Electric Power Company) Cowlitz River, City of Tacoma, 40 ° License amendment granted and Current Washington Washington project under construction. Back Creek, Virginia Electric and 2100 Application submitted to FPC 1983 Virginia Power Company in July, 1973, FERC license granted January 1977. Chippewa River, Northern States Power 30 Licensed and in operation. 1976 Wisconsin Company Kootenai River, Northern Lights, Inc. 144 Application submitted to Current Montana FERC April 1979 Mount Hope Lake, Jersey Central Power 1000 Application submitted in 1975 New Jersey and Light Company April 1975. (GPU System) Stony Creek, Pennsylvania Power & 1710 Application prepared in 1974, 1975 Pennsylvania Light Company and Metropolitan Edison Company (GPU System) Gila Indian Res., Arizona Power Authority 250-500 Project licensed. 1975 Arizona - Allegheny River, The Cleveland Electric 380 Licensed and in operation. 1969 Pennsylvania I1luminating Company and Pennsylvania Electric Co. (GPU System) Lake Havasu, Arizona Power Authority 500 Preliminary permit for further 1969 Arizona study, issued by FPC. Permit has been relinquished and project abandoned, : LIARZA _ NAME OF PROJECT Raystown eel Mossyrock Markland Brookville Pumped-Storage Nez Perce Warrior Ridge 2/ Marble Canyon Wanapum Mayfield Deep Greek 2/ Bridge Canyon 2-Canyon Priest Rapids Boulder Creek Box Canyon Strawberry Creek 1/ These are existing projects built before Federal Power Commission licenses were required. EXPERIENCE IN APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE FEDERAL REGULATORY COMMISSION Project inundated by New Raystown Federal development downstream. Licensed and in operation. Licensed and in operation. Preliminary permit for further study, issued by FPC. Applicant abandoned project after further study. Application rejected in favor of a competing project. License granted, Consideration halted by Congressional Act. Idcensed and in operation. Licensed and in operation. License granted. Consideration halted by Congressional Act Application rejected in favor of a competing project. Licensed and in operation, Licensed and in operation. Licensed and in operation. INITIAL CAPACITY LOCATION OWNER/ APPLICANT Qtw) STATUS Raystown Branch, Pennsylvania Electric 2 Juniata River, Company (GPU System) Cowlitz River, City of Tacoma, 300 Washington Washington Ohio River, Public Service Indiana 65 Indiana E. Fork White Public Service Indiana 240 River, Indiana Salmon and Snake Washington Public Power 250 Rivers, Washington Supply Systen Frankstown, Branch Pennsylvania Electric 2 Juniata River, Company (GSU System) Pennsylvania Colorado River, Arizona Power Authority 340 Arizona Columbia River, Public Utility District 831 Washington No. 2 of Grant County Cowlitz River, City of Tacoma, 120 Washington Washington Youghiogheny Pennsylvania Electric 19 River, Maryland Company (GPU System) Colorado River, Arizona Power Authority 480 Arizona Pend Oreille Public Utility District 300 River, Washington No. 1 of Pend Orielle County Columbia River, Public Utility District 789 Washington No. 2 of Grant County Boulder Creek, Garkane Power Association 4 Utah Pend Oreille Public Utility District 67 River, Washington No. 1 of Pend Oreille Strawberry Creek, Lower Valley Power and 2 Wyoming Light Company 26 Licensed and in operation. YEAR INITIAL OPERATION OR (MOST RECENT HARZA SERVICES) 1969 1968 1967 1965 1965 1965 1964 1963 1963 1963 1960 1960 1959 1958 1955 1951 NAME OF PROJECT “Castle Rock Petenwell June 1981 80. APP 2 EXPERIENCE IN APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE FEDERAL REGULATORY COMMISSION LOCATION Wisconsin River, Wisconsin Wisconsin River, Wisconsin QANER/ APPLICANT Wisconsin River Power Company Wisconsin River Power Company INITIAL CAPACITY (mw) 15 20 STATUS Licensed and in operation. Licensed and in operation. HARZA YEAR INITIAL OPERATION OR (MOST RECENT HARZA SERVICES) 1950 1949 HARZA_ ee COUNTRY AND REGION U.S.A. Nationwide U.S.A. Pakistan 3 Honduras United States, Virginia United States, Nationwide Helmand-Arghandad Valleys, Afghanistan United States, Pennsylvania and Maryland Sumatra, Indonesia - Provinces of North Sumatra and Aceh Kabul, Afghanistan United States, Virginia 4/ Korea, Nationwide — NAME OF CLIENT United States - Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency Argonne National Laboratory, United States Department of Energy Water and Power Develop- ment Authority Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica Virginia Electric and Power Company Argonne National Laboratory U. S. Agency for International Development Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. - Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. Perusahaan Umum Listrik Negara International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Virginia Electric and Power Company Economic Planning Board HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY ELECTRIC SYSTEM FORECASTS AND PLANNING SERVICES RENDERED GENERATING TRANSMISSION DATE SYSTEM SYSTEM LOAD AND POWER OF SIMULATION u/ ANALYSIS 2/ ENERGY MARKET LONG RANGE SERVICE BY COMPUTER ~ BY COMPUTER — FORECAST SURVEY PLAN (PERIOD) 1978-79 = x x = 1988-97 1978 = x xX - 2000 1976-1977 = xX - a 1979-1983 1977 - x = - 1980-2005 1977 x - a oa 1977-1985 1976-77 x = x = 1985-1995 1976 a = x x 1976-1990 1975=77' x = = - 1980-1995 1975 = - x x 1975-1990 1974-75 - = x x 1974-1980 1973 x = = - 1980-1984 1973-74 x x x x 1973-1998 Page 1 of 3 HARZA SERVICES RENDERED GENERATING TRANSMISSION DATE SYSTEM SYSTEM LOAD AND POWER OF SIMULATION / ANALYSIS 2/ ENERGY MARKET LONG RANGE COUNTRY _AND REGION NAME OF CLIENT SERVICE BY COMPUTER — BY COMPUTER — FORECAST SURVEY PLAN (PERIOD) Venezuela, Western Region 3/ Compania Anonima de 1973-76 x x 1973-1985 Administracion y Fomento Electrico (CADAFE) Iceland, Southwest Region Landsvirkjun, The National 1970 x x 1970-1975 Power Company Indonesia, City of Medan U.S. Agency for Inter- 1970 x = 1970-1975 and Environs national Development Brazil, State of Mato Centrais Eletricas 1964-70 Assistance and Review 1965-1970 Grosso Matogrossenses (USAID sponsor) Venezuela, Guayana Region Corporacion Venezolana 1961-69 - - 1969-1981 (Caroni River) de Guayana (CVG) 1974-75 - - 1961-1970 El Salvador, Nationwide s/ Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1946-76 x x 1974-1982 System Planning electrica del Rio Lempa (1974, 1969-1979 Power Market Survey (CEL) 1962, 1965-1975 1958, 1957-1967 1946) 1946-1956 Iran, Nationwide Ministry of Energy 1966-73 x _ 1967-1987 1976 - ial = Bolivia, Southern Region uv Empresa Nacional de 1968 x = 1968-1985 Electricidad (ENDE) Honduras, Nationwide Empresa Nacional de 1956-67 x x 1967-1976 System Planning Energia Electrica 1957-1966 Power Market Survey (ENEE) 1956-67 x (1967 ,1956) Pakistan, Nationwide Water and Power 1962-71 x x 1964-1985 System Planning Development Authority (1963) Power Market Survey Taiwan, Island-wide Taiwan Power Company 1964-66 Review 7 1965-1975 Honduras-El Salvador Empresa Nacional de 1963-64 = = 1964-1972 Interconnection Energia Electrica (ENEE) and Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) Afghanistan, Helmand Valley U.S. Agency for Inter- 1960-70 x x 1966-1968 national Development (1966) (Short range only) Page 2 of 3 HARZA COUNTRY _AND REGION Panama, Nationwide Canada, Ontario Province Philippines, Manila and Central Luzon System Planning Power Market Survey / Reservoir and power operations, hourly load dispatch, production cost NAME OF CLIENT Servicio Cooperativo Interamericano de Fomento Economico Great Lakes Power Corporation, Ltd. National Power Corporation SERVICES RENDERED GENERATING TRANSMISSION DATE SYSTEM SYSTEM LOAD AND POWER OF SIMULATION 1/ ANALYSIS 2/ ENERGY MARKET LONG RANGE SERVICE BY COMPUTER — BY COMPUTER ~ FORECAST SURVEY PLAN (PERIOD) 1957 - - x x 1957-1980 (1957) 1952-53 = = x = 1953-1963 1948-49 = > x x 1949-1960 (1949) / Load flows, transient stability, short circuit and Transient Network Analyzer / In Association with National Engineering Services (Pakistan) Limited / In Association with Tecnicos Consultores, S.R.L., OTEHA, C.A., and SERINEL (formerly Lima & Rodriguez Soto, S.A.) / In Association with Ing. A. Garcia Prieto L 2 3) 4/ In Association with Sanderson and Porter 5: Si i / In Association with Consultores Galindo B 20. PLN 1 October 1980 Page 3 of 3 HARZA EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING FOR DIESEL PROJECTS Year Number Capacity Plant In Of Per Unit Type of Engineering Client (Country) Plant Name Location Service Units (kw) Type of Units Fuel Application Services Performed Empresa Nacional de Puerto Cortes Puerto Cortes 1981 4 to 5,000 Diesel Bunker Base Load Prepare site Energia Electrica Thermal Plant IL 10 to 7,500 arrangements, design (ENEE) Honduras and specifications, Empresa Nacional Puerto Cortes Puerto Cortes 1980 4 7,500 Diesel Bunker C Base Load Prepare specifica- de Energia Elecricacion tions, bid evalua- (ENEE) Honduras tion, supervision of installation and testing. CVG-Electrificacion Guri Caroni River 1968 1 600 Diesel Diesel Emergency Selection, specifi- del Caroni, C.A. oil Power cation, installation (EDELCA) (Venezuela) (current) 2 800 Diesel Diesel Emergency and testing super- oil Power vision. Virginia Electric Bath County Back Creek, (current) 2 500 Diesel Diesel Emergency Selection, specifi- and Power Company Virginia Power cation, installation (VEPCO) (U.S.A.) and testing super- vision. Comision Ejecutiva Cerron Grande Lempa River, 1976 1 400 Diesel Diesel Emergency Selection, specifi- Hidroelectrica de El Salvador oil Power cation, installation Rio Lempa (CEL) and testing super- (El Salvador) vision. Perusahaan Umum Glugur Medan 1971-75 8 900 Diesel Diesel Peaking Inspected condition Listrik Negara (Existing) . to 2,700 O41 of existing gas tur- (Indonesta) bine and diesel Titt Kuning 6 4,000 Medium-speed Diesel Base Load generating plant and (New) recommended appropri~ ate rehabilitation. Studied possible raise of rating (15%) and change of fuel type for gas turbine. ~ Made site and unit selection.studies for addition of a six unit diesel plant. Design of plant and associated facilities, contract documents, bid evalu- ation, engineering services during construction, testing. Ministry of Energy Reza Shah Karun River, 1974 1 700 Diesel Diesel Bnergency Selection, specifi- (Iran) Kabir Dam Iran Power cation, supervision of installation, and testing. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan Michigan 1974 1 500 Diesel Diesel Emergency Selection, contract Michigan (USA) Pumping Station O11 Power documents, bid evalu- 2 200 Diesel. Diesel Emergency ation, supervision Oil Power of installation and testing. HARZA EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING FOR DIESEL PROJECTS YEAR NUMBER CAPACITY PLANT IN oF PER UNIT TYPE OF ENGINEERING CLIENT (COUNTRY) PLANT NAME LOCATION SERVICE UNITS (kW) TYPE OF UNITS ‘FUEL APPLICATION SERVICES PERFORMED Empresa Nacional Sucre Bolivia 1974 3. 3,000 Diesel Dual, Gas Base Load Feasibility report, detailed de Electrici- and Oil planning, contract documents, dad (ENDE) inspection, testing. (Bolivia) Government of Finchaa Ethiopia 1972 1 250 Diesel Diesel Oi] Emergency Selection, specifications, Ethiopia Power supervision installation (Ethiopia) and testing. Centrais Elet- State of Mato Grosso, 1970 10 1,700 Diegel Diesel Oil Base Load Planning,site selection, ricas Mato- Mato Grosso Brazil contract documents, bid grossenes, S.A. evaluation, construction (CEMAT} supervision, performance test (Brazil) evaluation. Water & Power Mangla Dam Jhelum River, 1968 1 600 Diesel Diesel Oil Emergency Review of specifications and Development Pakistan Power testing. Authority of West Pakistan Tarbela Indus River, 1970 2 1,000 Diesel Diesel Oil Emergency Review of specifications and (WADPA) Pakistan Power testing. (Pakistan) Empresa Nacional Rio Lindo Rio Lindo, 1969 1 150 Diesel Diesel Oil Emergency Selection, specifications, de Energia Elec- Honduras Power supervision of installation trica (ENEE) and testing. (Honduras) The Cleveland Seneca Pennsylvania 1968 1 400 Diesel Diesel Oil Emergency Selection, specifications, Electric Illum- Power supervision of ‘installation inating Company and testing. and Pennsylvania Electric Company (Pennsylvania U.S.A.) . City of Mossyrock Washington 1968 3 500 Diesel Diesel Oil Emergency Selection, specifications, Tacoma Power supervision of installation (Washington and testing. U. S. A.) Empresa Nacional Santa Fe Tegucigalpa 1968 4 2,500 Diesel Diesel Oil Peaking Planning studies, site selec- de Energia Elec- tion, bid evaluation and trica (ENEE) award of contract, plant (Honduras) layout, design of fuel storage facilities, electrical HV switchyard and control -2- house and engineering services during construction. CLIENT (COUNTRY) PLANT NAME Centrais Elet- various ricas Mato- Locations grossenes, S.A. (CEMAT) (Brazil) Landsvirkjun, The Burfell National Power Company (Iceland) U.S. Agency for ‘Kandahar International Development (USAID) (Afghanistan) National Power Company (NPC) (Philippines) Angat Empresa Nacional Canaveral de Energia Elec- trica (ENEE) (Honduras) PUD No. 2 Grant County, Ephrata, Washington (U.S.A) Priest Rapids Wanapum A 50. DSL 2 July 1981 YEAR PLANT IN LOCATION SERVICE Various 1967 Locations Thjorsa River ,1966 Iceland Kandahar 1964 Angat River, 1963 Philippines Rio Lindo, 1961 Honduras Columbia River,1961 Washington Columbia River,1964 Washington EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING FOR DIESEL PROJECTS NUMBER CAPACITY OF PER UNIT UNITS (kw) 10 units 1,700 in 5 plants, 2 units each 1 300 2 500 1 500 1 100 1 500 a 700 TYPE OF UNITS Diesels Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel FUEL Diesel Oil Diesel Oil Diesel Oil Diesel Oil Diesel Oil Diesel Oil Diesel Oil APPLICATION Base Load Emergency Power Base Load Emergency Power Emergency Power Emergency Power Emergency Power HARZA TYPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES PERFORMED Planning studies, site selection, specifications, bid evaluation, recom- mendations for award of contract, shop inspection, engineering services during construction and personnel training. Selection, specifications, supervision of installation and testing. Evaluation report for unit rehabilitation, purchase and shipment of all items required for rehabilitation and supervision of rehabili- tation, and personnel training. Selection, specifications, installation and testing supervision. Selection, specifications, supervision of installation and testing. Selection, specifications, supervision of installation and testing. Selection, specifications, supervision of installation and testing. EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PLANTS Introduction Harza Engineering Company has provided many electric utilities with engineering services for expansion, modernization, or consolidation of existing systems or for the creation of new systems. Frequently, the results of planning studies call for the installation of gas turbine generating plants for standby, peaking, or base loading purposes. The choice of the best type of installation will depend on the characteristics of the load and its expected growth, other generation in the system, and the availability of various types of fuels. Following the planning decisions, Harza continues to aid its clients in site selection, equipment selection studies, financing, preparation of contract documents, bid evaluation, contract award, preparation of detailed construction drawings, design of auxiliary facilities, engineering services during construction, and training of operating and maintenance personnel. Our experience in planning and design of these types installations in some 10 plants totalling 505,500 kilowatts is summarized in the following table and brief project descriptions. HARZA Client (Country) Plant Name Jersey Céntral Power and Light, (usa) Mount Hope I Mount Hopé IT Perusahaan Umum y Glugur Listrik Negara (Indonesia) ENDE (Bolivia) ve = CEL (El Salvador) Soyapango ENEE (Honduras) "| Landsvirkjun (Iceland) - EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PROJECTS Year Number Capacity Plant in of per Unit Type of Engineering Location Service Units (xe) Type of Units Fuel Application Services Performed New Jersey . 5 200,000 Combustion Distil- Undergroynd Appraisal and cost estimate Turbines with late Compressed = for a plant for which the Compressed Air Air Storage air would be stored at con- Stored Underground for Peaking stant or variable pressures in an underground cavity excavated for the purpose. New Jersey 1976 (Est.) 1 190,000 Combustion Distil- Underground Appraisal and cost estimate Turbines with late | Compressed for variable pressure air Compressed Air Air Storage storage in existing iron Stored Underground for Peaking mine workings. Medan Existing 1 12,500 Simple-Cycle Diesel Base Load Inspected condition of Unit Gas Turbine oil existing gas turbine and studied possible raise of rating (15%) and change of fuel type. Santa Cruz 1974 2 8,000 Simple-cycle Gas Base Load Feasibility Report. Gas Turbines San Salvador 1972 2 16,500 Simple-Cycle Diesel Peaking Detailed Planning Study Gas Turbines oil and Site Selection. Contract documents for turnkey. purchase and installation. Shop inspection, attested field performance tests. 1973 1 23,250 Simple-Cycle Diesel Peaking Assist in preparation of Gas Turbines oil specification, evaluation of bids and finalizing turnkey purchase contract. Attested field performance tests. San Pedro Not pres- ak 10,000 Simple-Cycle Diesel Reserve Detailed Planning Study Sula ently Gas Turbines oil and Site Selection. Scheduled Straumsvik 1969 2 17,500 Simple-Cycle Diesel Reserve Planning Study, Site Gas Turbines oil Selection, Contract Documents, Bid Evaluation and Award of Contract, Plant Layout, Electrical Connection, Substation, Control House, and Engi- neering Services During Construction. HARZA EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PROJECTS Year Number Capacity Plant in of per Unit Type of Engineering Client (Country) Plant Name Location Service Units (kW) Type of Units Fuel Application Services Performed WAPDA Shahdara Lahore 1969 4 14,500 Simple-Cycle Dual Base Load Bid Evaluation and (West Pakistan) Expansion Gas Turbines Fuel Engineering Services During Construction. WAPDA Shahdara Lahore 1965 2 13,250 Simple-Cycle Dual Base Load Contract Documents, Bid (West Pakistan) Gas Turbines Fuel Evaluation and Award of 1/ Under Construction November 1973 Contract, Plant Layout, Design of Fuel Handling Facilities, Electrical Connection, HV Switchyard and Control House, and Engineering Services During Construction. ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PLANTS Project: Mount Hope Compressed Air Storage Plant, USA Client: Jersey Central Power and Light Company (1973- ) An appraisal study was made of a 1000 MW combustion turbine plant involving storage of underground compressed air for Mount Hope, New Jersey. The compressor would be separated from the turbine and be driven during off-peak hours by the generator operating as a motor. The study included investigation of operating fuel requirements, air storage pressures and temperatures, and the effects of various generating and compressing times on investment costs. A hydrostatically compensated constant pressure cycle was compared with a constant volume variable pressure cycle as a basis for the thermodynamic power cycle. Investment costs were determined in terms of present and projected equipment prices. A planned schedule for long term construction and equipment installation was also developed. A similar companion study was made which considered installation of a single 190 MW combustion turbine for use with compressed air storage in existing site mine workings. Special attention was given to geological limitations on cycle pressures and temperatures through theoretical analyses and laboratory rock testing programs. Overall cycle performance was modelled including storage volume wall and air température fluctua- tions using computer techniques. Project: Medan Electric System Rehabilitation Client: U.S. Agency for International Development (1970) As part of a broad study of the condition and requirements for rehabilitation and modernization of the electric utility system in Medan, Sumatra, and environs, the condition of the Glugur Power Station was evaluated and a rehabilitation program established. This plant consists of eight diesel generator units ranging from 900 to 2700 kW capacity and a 12,500 kW gas turbine generator. Operating and maintenance procedures were developed that would improve the efficiency and availability of the Glugur Power Station in addition to the rehabili- tation program. Cost estimates for the Glugur Power Station rehabilitation were provided. HARZA ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PLANTS Project: Santa Cruz System Expansion, Bolivia Client: Empresa Nacional de Electricidad, ENDE (1972) A feasibility-level report was prepared for the expansion of the ENDE system in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. The report included a detailed power market forecast, evaluation of existing and potential future sources of power and the recommendation of future system additions. Due to the urgent need for power in the system only diesel engines and gas turbines were considered, because of their short erection times. The report recommended the installation of two 8000 kW simple cycle gas turbine generating units, fueled by natural gas and the construction of a 25- kilometer 69-kV transmission line to serve smaller towns in the Santa Cruz area. The project has been financed by a loan from the World Bank (IBRD). Engineering for the project is being carried out by the client. Project: CEL System Expansion 1969-1973, El Salvador Client: Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica del Rio Lempa (1969-1973) Harza has engineered all the major generation and transmission projects for El Salvador since 1946. The most recent detailed planning study of the national generation and transmission system of El Salvador was com- pleted early in 1969. In evaluating potential generating sources, con- sideration was given to hydroelectric plants, diesel, gas turbine, and steam-electric plants, geothermal plants, and nuclear power plants. As a result of the technical, economic, and financial analyses, a recommen- dation was made for the installation of a 33,000-kilowatt, simple-cycle gas turbine plant. Included recommendations for the plant site were the configuration of the electrical connection of the plant to the system, the size and type of fuel storage facilities, the method of financing the plant and the probable future operating expenditures. Harza prepared contract documents for turnkey purchase of the initial 2-unit installa- tion, evaluated the bids, reviewed manufacturer's drawings, performed shop inspection and witnessed shop and field tests, assistance also was given in preparation of purchase specifications, evaluation of bids and finalizing a purchase contract for a third gas turbine unit at the plant site. Harza reviewed and attested field performance tests for the third unit after installation. ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PLANTS Project: ENEE Reserve Capacity Study, Honduras Client: Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica (1968-1969) An evaluation of the present and future needs for reserve capacity and improved realiability of the ENEE system resulted in recommendations for the installation of a 10,000 kilowatt simple-cycle gas turbine generator plant and rehabilitation of the existing diesel generating plants. Project: Iceland Gas-Turbine Generating Plant Client: Landsvirkjun (The National Power Company) (1966-1969) As part of a study for the Burfell Hydroelectric Development a recommen- dation was made for the installation of a simple-cycle gas turbine plant of approximately 28,000-kilowatt capacity. A size of approximately 35,000-kilowatts was established as a result of the bidding. Harza prepared the plant layout, designed the fuel storage facilities, the step-up switchyard and control house; prepared the contract documents, evaluated the bids, and provided engineering services during construction. The entire plant entered service in 1969. Project: Shahdara Gas Turbine Plant Expansion, West Pakistan Client: Water and Power Development Authority of West Pakistan (1968-1969) Harza assisted its client in the evaluation of bids and the supervision of the installation of four 14,500-kilowatt gas turbine generator units. This part of an expansion plan for the Lahore, West Pakistan, gas turbine plant originally designed by Harza. ft ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINE PLANTS Project: Shahdara Gas Turbine Plant, West Pakistan Client: Water and Power Development Authority of West Pakistan (1965) In its role of general consultant to the Water and Power Development Authority of West Pakistan, Harza prepared the contract documents, evaluated bids and assisted in the award of contract for a gas turbine . plant with an.initial installed capacity of.26,500 kilowatts located at Shahdara, near Lahore, In addition, Harza prepared the plant layout, designed the fuel storage. facilities, the high voltage step-up switch- yard and control house, and provided engineering services during “construction of the plant. November 1973 HARZA EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF TRANSMISSION LINES vearl! oy INITIAL HARZA— PROJECT CLIENT OPERATION LOCATION LENGTH (Km) VOLTAGE (kV) SUPPORTS CIRCUIT SERVICES Mayfield City Light Division 1982 U.S.A. 0.3 230 Steel and Single D, sc Tacoma, Wash. Aluminum (3 towers) Expansion de Guri C.V.G. Electrificacion u.c. Venezuela 5 765 Steel Towers Double D del Caroni C.A. (EDELCA) 1981 Direccion de Obras de Guri Apartado 62413 Caracas, Venezuela Mul tan-Lyallpur-Guddu Water & Power Development 1981 Pakistan 550 500 Steel Towers Single D & SC Authority, WAPDA House Lahore, Pakistan Antelope Valley Basin Electric Power 1980 U.S.A. 445 500 Steel Towers Single D Cooperative 1717 E. Interstate Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 58501 Antelope Valley Basin Electric Power 1980 U.S.A. 100 345 Steel Towers Single D Cooperative Steel Poles 1717 E, Interstate Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 58501 Ahuachapan-Sonsonate Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1980 El Salvador 26.5 TLS; Steel Towers Single FS & D electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador San Rafael Cedros - Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1980 El Salvador 88 69 to Steel Towers Single FS & D San Miguel - 69 kV to electrica del Rio Lempa 11S; Fiberglass & 115 kV Conversion (CEL) Steel Crossarms 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador Tower 14 - Nuevo Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1980 El Salvador 5.6 ris) Steel Towers Double FS & D Cuscatlan electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador HARZA EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF TRANSMISSION LINES vearl/ INITIAL HARZAz/ PROJECT CLIENT OPERATION LOCATION LENGTH (Km) VOLTAGE (kV) SUPPORTS CIRCUIT SERVICES Missouri Basin Power Basin Electric Power 1977 U.S.A. 100 345 Steel Towers Double D Project Cooperative 1717 E. Interstate Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 58501 Missouri Basin Power Basin Electric Power 1977 U.S.A. 294 345 Steel Towers Single D Project Cooperative 1717 E. Interstate Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 5850L Cost Study Basin Electric Power 1977 U.S.A. = 115 Steel Towers Single Study Cooperative 230 Steel Poles 1717 E. Interstate Ave. Steel H-Frame Bismarck, North Dakota Wood Poles 58501 San Rafael Cedros - Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1976 EL Salvador 83 115 Steel Towers Single FS & San Miguel electrica del Rio Lempa D, & SC (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y l7a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador Uribante-Caparo C.A. de Administracion y (1977) Venezuela 540 400 Steel Towers Single FS Fomento Electrico (CADAFE) Apartado No. 5179 (EL Este Chacao) Caracas 105, Venezuela Uribante-Caparo C.A. de Administracion y (1977) Venezuela 410 230 Steel Towers Single FS Fomento Electrico (CADAFE) Apartado No. 5179 (El Este Chacao) Caracas 105, Venezuela Uribante-Caparo C.A. de Administracion y (1977) Venezuela 60 115 Steel Towers Double FS Fomento Electrico (CADAFE) Apartado No. 5179 (EL Este Chacao) Caracas 105, Venezuela Uribante-Caparo C.A. de Administracion y (1977) Venezuela 80 115 Steel Towers Single FS Fomento Electrico (CADAFE) Apartado No. 5179 (El Este Chacao) Caracas 105, Venezuela PROJECT Cerron Grande - Nejapa Guri - Powerhouse Extension - Switchyard Reza Shah Kabir - Omidieh Reza Shah Kabir - Arak Reza Shah Kabir - Esfahan Reza Shah Kabir - Ahwaz Santa Ana - Ahuachapan Cerron Grande - 5 de Noviembre EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF TRANSMISSION LINES CLIENT Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador C.V.G,. Electrificacion del Caroni C.A. (EDELCA) Direccion de Obras de Guri Apartado 62413 Caracas, Venezuela Ministry of Energy (TAVAN IR) Varzesh Avenue Tehran, Iran Ministry of Energy (TAVANIR) Varzesh Avenue Tehran, Iran Ministry of Energy (TAVANIR) Varzesh Avenue Tehran, Iran Ministry of Energy (TAVANIR) Varzesh Avenue Tehran, Iran Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador 1976 1977 u.c. 1978 UC. 1978 u.c. 1977 1975 1975 1975 yearl/ INITIAL OPERATION LOCATION El Salvador Venezuela Iran Iran Iran Iran El Salvador EL Salvador LENGTH (Km) VOLTAGE (kV) 40 160 266 213 136 36.6 18 115 400 400 400 400 400 115 115) Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel SUPPORTS Towers Towers Towers Towers Towers Towers Towers Towers CIRCUIT Double Double Single Single Single Single Single Single D, FS & D & SC D, FS & D, FS & narza2/ SERVICES sc sc sc sc sc sc sc HARZA PROJECT Sucre-Potosi Zanja del Tigre Zanja del Tigre Yacyreta-Apipe Yacyreta-Apipe San Rafael Cedros - San Miguel 2nd Transmission Line Finchaa - Addis Ababa Acajutla - San Salvador EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF TRANSMISSION LINES yearL! INITIAL CLIENT OPERATION Empresa Nacional de 1974 Electricidad (ENDE) Casilla 565 Cochabamba, Bolivia Comision Nacional de . la Cuenca del Plata 25 de Mayo 459 Buenos Aires, Argentina (1974) Comision Nacional de la Cuenca del Plata 25 de Mayo 459 Buenos Aires, Argentina (1974) Entidad Binacional Yacyreta Ada. Pte. Roque Saenz Pena No. 501 Piso 5 Buenos Aires, Argentina (1973) Entidad Binacional Yacyreta Ada. Pte. Roque Saenz Pena No. 501 Piso 5 Buenos Aires, Argentina (1973) Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador 1973 Ethiopian Electric Light & Power Authority P. O. Box 1233 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 1972 Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador 1971 LOCATION Bolivia Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina El Salvador Ethiopia El Salvador LENGTH (Km) 94 180 180 1818 531 109 200 80 VOLTAGE (kV) 69 220 220 500 230 115 230 LIS SUPPORTS Wood Pole H-Frame Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers narza2/ CIRCUIT SERVICES Single D, FS & SC Double FS Single FS Double FS Double FS Single D & SC Single D& SC Single D& SC PROJECT Rio Lindo - Main Line Rio de Casca - Cuiaba Burfell-Aluminum Smel ter-Reykjavik Guri - Powerhouse - Switchyard Mendoza Rio Hondo La Yeguada - Divisa Pisayambo - Quito North-South Load Center Opico-Acajutla EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF veart! INITIAL CLIENT OPERATION Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica (ENEE) Apartado 99 Tegucigalpa, D.C., Honduras 1970 Centrais Eletricas 1970 Matogrossenses, S.A. Rua Barao de Melgaco 320 Cuiaba, MI, Brazil Landsvirkjun 1969 The National Power Co. Sudurlandsbraut 14 Reykjavik, Iceland C.V.G. Electrificacion del Caroni C.A. (EDELCA) Direccion de Obras de Guri Apartado 62413 Caracas, Venezuela 1969 Agua y Energia 1969 Electrica (AyEE) Lavalle 1554 Buenos Aires, Argentina Agua y Energia 1969 Electrica (AyEE) Lavalle 1554 Buenos Aires, Argentina Instituto de Recursos Hidraulicos y Electrifi- cacion Apartado 5285 Panama City, Panama 1967 Junta Nacional de Pla- nificacion y Coordina- cion Economica Quito, Ecuador (1966) Water & Power Development Authority, WAPDA House Lahore, Pakistan (1966) Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y L7a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador 1965 LOCATION Honduras Brazil Iceland Venezuela Argentina Argentina Panama Ecuador Pakistan El Salvador TRANSMISSION LINES LENGTH (Km) VOLTAGE (kV) ab 138 80 138 115.5 220 L 220 255 220 152 138 37 34.5 120 138 1300 500 115 115 34.5 Be uus SUPPORTS Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Concrete Poles Concrete Poles Wood Poles Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers CIRCUIT Double Single Single & Double Double Single Single Single Double Single Single Double Single naRza2/ SERVICES D& SC FS, RDO & SC D& SC D& SC RDO & SC RDO & SC D& SC FS FS D& SC PROJECT Santa Ana - Guajoyo Bufalo - San Pedro Sula Tegucigalpa-Canaveral - Bufalo Substation Priest Rapids-Wanapum- Columbia Wanapum - Switchyard Karadj - Tehran Arghandab-Kandahar Guri - Santa Teresa San Salvador - Santa Ana EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF TRANSMISSION LINES veart! INITIAL CLIENT OPERATION Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1964 electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador Empresa Nacional de 1963 Energia Electrica (ENEE) Apartado 99 Tegucigalpa, D.C., Honduras Empresa Nacional de 1963 Energia Electrica (ENEE) Apartado 99 Tegucigalpa, D.C., Honduras PUD No. 2 of Grant County 1963 30 "C" Street S.W. P. 0. Box 878 Ephrata, Washington 98823 PUD No. 2 of Grant County 1963 30 "C" Street S.W. P. O. Box 878 Ephrata, Washington 98823 Water and Power 1962 Organization 16 Farvardin Avenue Tehran, Iran Ministry of Water 1962 and Power Afghanistan C.V.G. Electrificacion del Caroni C.A. (EDELCA) Direccion de Obras de Guri Apartado 62413 Caracas, Venezuela (1961) Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1960 electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) Ya. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y L7a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador LOCATION El Salvador Honduras Honduras U.S.A. U.S.A. Iran Afghanistan Venezuela El Salvador LENGTH (Km) 28 16 19L 84 53 51 570 50 VOLTAGE (kV) SUPPORTS 115 138 138 230 230 138 69 400 115 Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Poles Steel Towers Steel Towers CIRCUIT Single Double Single Single Single Double Single Double Single naRzA2! SERVICES Dé SC Dé SC D& SC RDO & SC D & SC D & SC FS D& SC HARZA _ PROJECT Priest Rapids - Midway Guayabo - San Salvador San Rafael Cedros - San Miguel Rincon del Bonete - Montevideo EXPERIENCE IN ENGINEERING OF TRANSMISSION LINES veart! INITIAL CLIENT OPERATION PUD No. 2 of Grant County 1960 30 "C" Street S.W. P. 0. Box 878 Ephrata, Washington 98823 Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1956 electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y 17a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador Comision Ejecutiva Hidro- 1954 electrica del Rio Lempa (CEL) 9a. Calle Poniente No. 950 Entre 15a. y l7a. Avenida Norte San Salvador, El Salvador Comision Tecnica Finan- 1947 ciera de las Obras Hidroelectricas del Rio Negro Montevideo, Uruguay 1/ u.c. - indicates "under construction" u.d. - indicates "under design" (19__) - indicates year of feasibility study 2/ D- = Design FS - Feasibility Study RDO - Review of Design of Others SC - Services during Construction B 30. LIN 1 April 1981 LOCATION U.S.A. El Salvador El Salvador Uruguay LENGTH (Km) 34 63 83 19 214 VOLTAGE (kV) 230 115 66 161 161 SUPPORTS Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers Steel Towers CIRCUIT Single Single Single Double Single narzaz! SERVICES D& SC D& SC D& SC D & SC HARZA HARZA DISTRIBUTION EXPERIENCE Project Name Date Location Voltage (kV) Type of System Harza Services* Underground Distri- 1977 Saudi Arabia 1358 Urban R bution Review, New Jeddah Rural Electrification 1977 Egypt 66 Urban and Rural ES, R, SC, TG, SP, Authority Electric to 33 P, SPL System Rehabilitation 1980 dL and Expansion Egyptian Electricity 1977 Egypt 66 Urban and Rural Dy, Ry IG; SP, P; Authority Electric to 33 SPL System Rehabilitation 1978 ney and Expansion Perusahaan Umum 1975 North Sumatra 6 Urban and Rural FS Listrik Negara - Indonesia 20 Load Forecast and Distribution System Expansion Electric System 1973 Korea 154 Urban and Rural SPL Management and to 66 Long Range Planning 1974 Various Services Medan Electric Power 1970 Sumatra, 7 Urban and Rural SPL, D, FS, SP, System Rehabilitation 1971 Indonesia 11.5/20 P, SC and Expansion to 1976 Cochabamba Electric 1968 Bolivia 7.2/13.8 Urban and Rural SPL, D, SP, FS, Power System to 33 R Rehabilitation and 1969 Expansion Page l HARZA Project Name CEMAT Electric Power Systems Expansion Rehabilitation and Operations General Consulting Services to Water and Power Development Authority General Consulting Services to Ministry Water and Power Tegucigalpa Electric Subtransmission and Distribution System Modernization San Juan and Tulum Valley Electric Power System Expansion and Rehabilitation Helmand Valley Power Distribution Project Mendoza Transmission and Distribution B 40. DIS 1 October 1978 Date 1964 to 1970 1961 to 1973 1968 to Date 1956 to 1963 1969 to 1972 1967 1970 1967 to 1970 FS sc HARZA DISTRIBUTION EXPERIENCE Location Voltage (kV) Type of System Harza Services* State of Mato 138 Urban and Rural TG, SPL, SP, D, Grosso, 33 P, OM, SC Brazil 6.9/12.5 West Pakistan 69 Urban and Rural TG, SPL, SP, D, 33 P, OM, SC, R 1l Iran 69 Urban and Rural TG, SPL, SP, D, 33 OM, R 1; Honduras 38 Urban and Rural D, SPL, SP, OM 23/4 Argentina 33 Urban and Rural TG, SPL, D, SP, 13.8 R Afghanistan 35:3: Urban and Rural SPL, D, SP, P, 142/13.2 sc Argentina 13.2 Urban and Rural R, P, SC 66 Design TG - Technical Guidance Feasibility Study SP - Specifications Review P - Procurement Service During Construction OM - Operations and Maintenance SPL - System Planning Page 2 MAJOR ELECTRIC POWER SUBSTATIONS DESIGNED BY HARZA SINCE 1946 vearl/ OPERATION NUMBER 2/ INITIAL VOLTAGE - CAPACITY OF SWITCHING = NAME OF STATION LOCATION OPERATION (KV) MVa CIRCUITS ARRANGEMENT Bath County Virginia ud. 500 2700 5 Ring £/ 1983 Mayfield Washington u.c. 230 180 4 Ring 1982 San Lorenzo El Salvador uc. 115 180 6 1-1/2 Bkr. 1982 San Martin El Salvador u.c. 115 100 5 1-1/2 Bkr. ° 1982" Gari Venezuela u.c. 765 3220 5 1-1/2 Bkr. 1980 Sonsonate El Salvador -U.c. 115 - 3 Ring/expandable 1980 to 1-1/2 Bkr. Yacyreta-Apipe! Argentina & ad. 230 3000 26 1-1/2 Bkr £/ Paraguay 1980 Hrauneyjafoss Iceland uc. 230 300 6 Ring 1979 Nuevo Cuscatlan El Salvador u.c. 115/34.5/23 50 2/2/21 Ring/expandable 1979 to 1-1/2 Bkr. Rio Lindo Honduras 1978 138 50 2 1-1/2 Bkr. Expansion Cerron Grande El Salvador 1977 115 300 8 1-1/2 Bkr. Arak 3/ Iran 1977 400/230 450 1/4 mod. 1-1/2 Bkr. Esfahan v Iran 1977 400/230 300 1/4 mod. 1-1/2 Bkr. oaidien 3/ Iran 1977 400/230 450 1/2 mod. 1-1/2 Bkr. Ahwaz v Iran 1977 400/230 300 1/4 mod. 1-1/2 Bkr. Reza Shah Kabir Iran 1977 400 1000 4 1-1/2 Bkr. Duncan Jamaica - 1977 138/69 40 1/2 Ring Page 1 HARZA NAME OF STATION Nejapa-Addition Sucre Potosi Guayabo-Additions Santa Ana Addition Tecoluca Usulutan San Rafael Cedros San Miguel Finchaa Gafarsa Guatape Rio Lindo San Pedro Sula - Addition San Antonio Abad Opico-Additions Nejapa Burfell Geithals Irafoss-Additions Kinzua Robert S. Kerr Guri Guri El Tigre Santa Teresa Mossyrock Acajutla~Additions Opico San Rafael Cedros = Additions LOCATION El Salvador Bolivia Bolivia El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador Ethiopia Ethiopia Colombia Honduras Honduras El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador Iceland Iceland Iceland Pennsylvania Oklahoma Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Venezuela Washington El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador MAJOR ELECTRIC POWER SUBSTATIONS DESIGNED BY HARZA SINCE 1946 yearly! OPERATION NUMBER y INITIAL VOLTAGE CAPACITY OF swrtcHIne 2! OPERATION (KV) MVa CIRCUITS ARRANGEMENT 1975 115/23 50 5/2 1-1/2 Bkr. 1974 69 13 1 SB 1974 69 13 1 sB 1974 us 85 7 sB 1974 115/46 7] 3/1 SB 1973 - 115/46 20 2/2 SB 1973 115/46 20 2/2 SB 1973 15/69/46 ry] 3/1/2 SB 1973 115 /69/46 20 W/1/4 SB 1973 230 120 1 SB 1973 230 120 1 1-1/2 Bkr. 1971 230 530 2 DBS Bkr. 1971 138 48 5 1-1/2 Bkr. 1971 138/69 20 in sB 1970 115/23 50 2/2 Ring 1970 115 4/ 3 SB 1970 115 4/ 3 Ring 1969 230 175 4 MTFB 1969 230/132 4s 6 MTFB 1969 230 7] 2 SB 1969 230 460 1 SB 1969 161 130 5 1-1/2 Bkr. 1969 230 410 5 DBS Bkr. 1969 400 260 2 1-1/2 Bkr. 1969 400 4) 2 1-1/2 Bkr. 1969 400 4s 1 1-1/2 Bkr. 1968 230 300 4 1-1/2 Bkr. 1966 115/34.5 35 2/3 MTFB 1966 115 4/ 3 SB 1954-66 115/69/46 4/ 21/2 SB Page 2 MAJOR ELECTRIC POWER SUBSTATIONS DESIGNED BY HARZA SINCE 1946 veart! OPERATION NUMBER 2/ INITIAL VOLTAGE CAPACITY OF SWITCHING — NAME OF STATION LOCATION OPERATION (KV) MVa CIRCUITS ARRANGEMENT Sam Rayburn Texas 1965 138 65 5 Ring Canaveral Honduras 1964 138 40 5 MTFB San Pedro Sula Honduras 1964 138/69 20 3/2 MIFB Country Club Honduras 1964 138/34.5 16 1/2 SB Guajoyo El Salvador 1964 115/46 15 1 SB Soyapango - Additions El Salvador 1954-64 115/22 100 2/6 MTFB Wanapum Switchyard Washington 1963 230 5/ 4 MTFB Priest Rapids Washington 1963 230 3/ 3 SB Switchyard . Karadj Iran 1962 132 70 5 SB Gavins Point South Dakota 1957 115 s/ 6 MIFB Blakely Mountain Arkansas 1955 115 5/ 3 1-1/2 Bkr. Box Canyon Washington 1955 115 65 5 SB San Miguel El Salvador 1954 69/22 10 1/2 SB Rincon del Bonete Uruguay 1946 161 3/ 6 DBS Bkr. Montevideo, South Uruguay 1946 31.5 af 24 MTFB Montevideo, North Uruguay 1946 161/31.5 5/ 6/17 DBS Bkr. Montivedo "G" Uruguay 1946 31.5 5/ 10 MTFB Montivideo "J" Uruguay 1946 31.5 S/ 10 MIFB V/s usc. = indicates "under construction" 3/ These have essentially 500 kV insulation because ud. = indicated "under design" of altitude and salt contamination. 2/ MIFB = Main and Transfer Bus 4/ Facility is a major switching station. SB = Single Bus No ‘transformation - no MVa rating. 1-1/2 Bkr. = Breaker and a half 5/ Capacity information not available. mod. L-1/2 Bkr. = Modified Breaker and a half 6/ SF, Gas-insulated substation (GIS). Ring = Ring Bus B 50. SUB 1 January 1980 Page 3 eee HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY PROCEDURE — | FOR PROJECT COST ESTIMATING I. INTRODUCTION Established HARZA procedures make the Construction Management Department responsible for all construction cost estimates. Esti- mates for civil works are prepared by the Cost Estimating Section of this Department. Estimates for other work are prepared by the design divisions concerned, then forwarded to the Estimating Depart- ment for review and processing. Il. TYPES OF ESTIMATES Most construction cost estimates are made in the pre-construction period. They may be classified according to purpose and degree of detail as report estimates (pre-feasibility or feasibility), alter- nate studies, funding estimates, and "Engineer's Estimates." Some characteristics of these types of estimates are given below: 1. Pre-feasibility Estimates are intended to assist in selecting from a number of alternatives one or more projects that warrant further study. Design information at this stage is typically very sketchy, and highly approximate quantities of a few major items are provided. Since no subsurface exploration is normally done for this phase, geologic information is usually meager and highly generalized. 2. Feasibility Estimates are prepared to determine if a given pro- ject is economically feasible. At this stage, reasonably complete project layouts and typical sections (not fully dimensioned) of major structures have been prepared and considerable geologic information is available. Approximate quantities of more major items are provided than in the previous phase. In the pre-screening phase of extensive pre-feasibility studies, a series of unit prices is often requested before any layouts or quantities are developed. These are later applied to sche- dules of quantities by the planning engineers to produce pre- liminary screening estimates, which are later supplemented by more definitive estimates of the more desirable projects. 36 Alternate Studies are carried out at various times during the design period. Estimates of unit prices for a number of alter- nates are required for these studies. Depending on the circum- stances and information available, these may be in more or less detail than a feasibility estimate. Typically, the designer requires a fairly high degree of detail and accuracy in order to optimize the design, but not enough information is available to permit defining the alternates in sufficient detail to estimate the. costs with the desired degree of accuracy. 4, "Engineer's Estimates" are prepared for comparison with bids. While report estimates generally cover a complete project, "Engineer's Estimates" normally are prepared for each contract separately and are intended to approximate the price that would be bid by an informed, prudent con- tractor in a reasonably competitive situation. Ideally the "Engineer's Estimate" is prepared after the project has been advertised for bids, so complete contract drawings and spe- cifications are available, together with all other information that is available to bidders. This type of estimate, therefore, is usually more accurate than report estimates. It. PROCEDURES FOR FEASIBILITY ESTIMATES 1. Introduction Feasibility estimates of costs for constructing a hydroelectric project include costs for project structures and equipment, access roads, operator's facilities, transmission lines, purchase of lands and buildings, and relocation of roads and other public facilities that will be affected by the project. Detailed estimates of the quantities of work are calculated from the project plans and unit prices or lump sum costs are estimated for each item of work. The estimated costs of major equipment items are based on information supplied by manufacturers and data available from other similar projects. Construction Costs All construction costs are classified either as construction work or equipment purchases. Each of the project features shown in the estimate consist of one or the other or both of these cost classifications. Accordingly, the items within each project feature are estimated either as part of a con- struction contract or an equipment purchase. Costs of labor and locally available construction materials such as cement, reinforcing steel, explosives, and fuel are obtained from reliable local sources. Construction equipment costs are developed from U.S. hourly rates and are adjusted to local conditions. The fuel costs used in the éstimate are based on current prices in project areas. as — HARZA Bs Labor The labor rates used for estimating the cost of skilled and common labor are adjusted to represent the hourly pay based on the anticipated project work week, including appropriate ~ fringe benefits. In calculating unit prices, all labor costs are increased by a percentage to provide for shift differen- tials and overtime. 4. Construction Equipment Hourly rates for construction equipment applicable in the U.S. are adjusted to reflect conditions prevailing in the project area. The cost of operating an item of construction equipment (not including its operator) includes depreciation, | major repairs, and fuel, oil, grease, and minor repairs. | a. Construction Material The prices of materials locally available, delivered at the project site, are estimated using representative prices plus the cost of transportation to the site. 6. Construction Work The quantities of work are computed from the project plans. Unit costs for the major work items within each feature of the project estimate such as open and underground excavation, concrete, penstock steel, and embankment are calculated in detail using present day labor, construction equipment, and material costs prevalent in the project area. Production rates required to meet the construction schedule are used in determining appropriate equipment and number of laborers. The unit costs thus obtained are adjusted to include an allowance for a contractor's profit and overhead. Appropriate amounts for all other work items are based on previous bidding experience with profit and overhead. These items include installation of the major mechanical and electrical equipment, transmission line, piping, wiring, architectural work, all gates, guides, trashracks, and other permanent construc- tion normally included under the general construction contract. Anticipated overhead costs normally incurred by a contractor include items such as housing and other camp facilities, offices, shops, warehouses, supervisory personnel, recurring expenses, home office overhead, insurance, and transportation. These costs do not cover escalation during the period of construction; they do represent an estimate of cost as of the time the estimate is prepared. The following items are considered in estimating the contractor's indirect costs: + VANFZ7- A Personnel Costs. Personnel costs include the salaries and fringe benefits of the foreign and national person- nel estimated to be required for supervision and admin- istration of actual construction activities, together with an estimate of the transportation costs required for all personnel and their dependents. Camp Costs. Camp costs include the contractor's field office, warehouses, shops, light vehicles and equipment, housing powerplant and lighting system, water and sewage system, recreational facilities, streets, open storage areas, fire protection, and camp insurance. Home Office Overhead. This item is estimated to be a percentage of all the contractor's costs. Income Tax and Profit. It is assumed that the contrac- tor's net profit and local income taxes will amount to a percentage of the total construction contract value. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment The cost estimates for turbines, generators, and transformers are based on experience for similar equipment items on other projects. Preliminary price quotations obtained from manufac- turers verify the accuracy of these estimates. The estimates covering purchase and installation of piping, valves, electrical conduit, wiring, and related accessory electrical and miscellaneous mechanical equipment and mater- ials are based on bidding experience for similar work. Specific bid prices for purchase and erection of transmission lines and switchyard facilities are also used as a guide. All previously bid unit prices and lump sum amounts which are used are adjusted to present day prices. Land Acquisition and Relocations The value of land that will be purchased for the project is estimated from data gathered during reconnaissance of the area, interviews with farmers and land owners, and from data supplied by government agencies and financial agencies. The project cost includes the purchase of land and buildings, and it also includes allowance for the relocation of persons now living in the area. The project cost includes the costs of relocating roads, tele- phone and power lines. The studies for determining these costs are based on studies of maps and air photos, field surveys, meetings with agencies and consultants, and inter- views with people from the region. 10. 11. Price Escalation According to information published periodically in the Engineering News Record, most costs have escalated over the past few years. Construction equipment and materials obtained on the world market have increased in cost at a rate of about five percent per year. The construction work costs are increased to reflect expected escalation during construction. A percentage allowance is included in the cost estimates for cost escalation during construction periods of different length. Escalation is normally not applied to the cost of mechanical and electrical equipment because the experience data and manufacturers' quotations are equivalent to current bid prices, which already include price escalation. Contingencies To allow for unforeseen construction problems, changes in design, and errors and omissions in estimating, a percentage of all construction work costs (including escalation) and a percentage of all equipment costs are added to the estimate. Engineering and Owner's Overhead Based on experience for other hydroelectric projects elsewhere, an allowance for engineering and owner's overhead expenses is added to the total of the preceding costs. This percentage is based on a percentage for engineering and supervision of construction and a percentage for owner's overhead costs to be charged against project construction. HARZA TABULATION OF COST ESTIMATING DATA FOR MAJOR PROJECTS (Amounts Shown in Millions of Dollars) Engineer's Date of Estimate for Project Location Bids Civil Works Low Bid Strontia Springs Colorado Apr. 79 27.8 28.4 Dam Lock & Dam #1 Minnesota Apr. 79 12.45 18.0 Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project: a) Pumping Station Illinois Sept. 79 141.5 168.8 Part I b) Pumping Station Illinois March 79 74.0 64.7 Part II c) Pumping Station Illinois Apr. 79 32.5 28.0 Part III Hrauney jafoss Iceland a) 306 - 2 and 3 Sept. 79 13.4 8.9 b) 306 - 4 and 5 Sept. 79 12.3 21.2 c) 306 - 6 Oct. 79 2.9 2.5 Mayfield Washington Apr. 80 3.7 3.2 Williston N. Dakota June 80 1.1 94 Hadley Falls Massachusetts Aug. 80 1.3 1.2 El Nispero Hydro- Honduras Nov. 1978 17.2 18.3 electric Project Kajakai Gates Afghanistan Jan. 1978 15.4 16.6 HARZA TABULATION OF COST ESTIMATING DATA FOR MAJOR PROJECTS (Amounts Shown in Millions of Dollars) (Continued) Engineer's Date of Estimate for Project Location Bids Civil Works Low Bid Tavera Bao Dam Dominican Jan. 1978 41.3 31.2 Republic L Buried Concrete Michigan Sept. 1977 1.4 1.0 Water Supply Reservoir Uribante-Doradas Development: a) Diversion Tunnel Venezuela June 1977 12.2 10.0 b) La Honda Dan, Venezuela June 1978 108.7 112.0 Spillway and Outlet Works c) Power Tunnel and Venezuela July 1978 119.0 116.0 Powerhouse San Lorenzo Dam: a) Subsurface El Salvador May 1977 0.7 0.6 | Exploration — b) General El Salvador April 1978 87.2 64.6 Construction J Guri Project Final Venezuela Dec. 1976 1,356.4 1,154.7 Stage, Dam Raising, Powerhouse and ‘ Embankment s Subway Stations: : a) Excavation and Wash. D.C. Dec. 1976 61.2 70.9 Lining - b) Finish Contracts: : : 1) Rockville Route Wash. D.C. Dec. 1978 6.7 6.6 : 2) Cleveland Park Wash. D.C. Jan, 1979 4.3 4.8 3) Van Ness Wash. D.C. Jan. 1979 3.6 4.4 Station Tilden Tailings Michigan Feb. 1976 13.6 11.5 Dam : Nashville Ave. Sewer Illinois Feb. 1976 21.1 21.8 Tunnel HARZA TABULATION OF COST ESTIMATING DATA FOR MAJOR PROJECTS (Amounts Shown in Millions of Dollars) (Continued) Engineer's Date of Estimate for Project Location Bids Civil Works Low Bid Upper Du Page Illinois Dec. 1975 3.5 3.3 Reservoir and Site Development Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project: a) Addison to Illinois Oct. 1975 65.5 63.1 Wilmette : b) 59th St. to Illinois Sept. 1977 85.6 86.5 Central ec) Central to Damen’ Illinois Oct. 1977 116.2 98.9 d) Damen to Roosevelt Illinois Nov. 1977 114.4 107.8 e) Roosevelt to Ogden Illinois Dec. 1977 99.9 102.0 f) Ogden to Addison Illinois Jan. 1978 94.2 85.2 575.8 543.5 Nader Shah Dam Iran April 1975 93.6 114.6 Lake Yojoa-Rio Lindo Expansion a) Furnish and Honduras Feb. 1975 7.9 7.1 Install Penstock b) General Con- Honduras April 1975 13.5 15.8 (1) struction Storm Agnes Repairs Virginia Feb. 1975 0.7 0.6 and Restoration Upper and Lower Occoquan Dams Andrews Generating Canada Nov. 1973 2.4 2.5 Station Cornell Hydroelectric Wisconsin Sept. 1973 5.8 4.9 Plant Gavin Fly Ash Dam Ohio April 1973 3.4 2.1 Subway Tunnel Wash. D.C. Dec. 1972 35.2 (2) 30.6 Excavation and Lining NOTES: (L) Original bid was $17.0 million. Negotiations resulted in a target estimate of $15.8 million. HARZA TABULATION OF COST ESTIMATING DATA FOR MAJOR PROJECTS (Amounts Shown in Millions of Dollars) (Continued) Engineer's Date of Estimate for Project Location Bids Civil Works Low Bid Cerron Grande Dam and Power Plant a) Diversion Tunnel El Salvador July 1972 b) General Con- El Salvador June 1973 struction Gavin Plant Coal Conveyors; Earthwork, Fabrication & Delivery of Conveyor Bridges, Concrete & Steel Erection Ohio . March 1972 Electric Lake Dam Utah Jan. 1972 and Outlet Works Lawrence Ave. Tunnel Illinois Oct. 1969 Finchaa Dam and Ethiopia August 1969 Power Plant Reza Shah Kabir Dam Iran Jan. 1969 1 and Power Plant Rio Lindo Intake and Honduras Sept. 1968 Power Plant Robert S. Kerr Power- Oklahoma Feb. 1968 house Seneca Pumped-Storage Pennsylvania March 1966 Power Plant Burfell Diversion Iceland Feb. 1966 Works and Power Plant NOTES: (2) Estimate as submitted by Harza as design $35.2 million as shown; actual estimate b was raised by general consultant to $38.1 (3) Original bid was $48.1 million. Negotiat a target estimate of $37.6 million. 3.7 2.3 34.5 37.6 (3) 8.3 8.0 4.3 4.2 4.7 6.2 14.0 14.3 08.7 96.8 12.0 11.9 4.8 5.1 16.9 19.5 19,2 19.1 consultants was efore bid opening million. ions resulted in HARZA TABULATION OF COST ESTIMATING DATA FOR MAJOR PROJECTS (Amounts Shown in Millions of Dollars) (Continued) Engineer's Date of Estimate for Project Location Bids Civil Works Low Bid Mossyrock Dam and Washington Dec. 1964 42.9 42.6 Power Plant LaYeguada Diversion Panama Oct. 1964 2.0 2.0 Works and Power Plant Markland Powerhouse Indiana Feb. 1964 9.7 10.8 Guri Dam and Power Venezuela May 1963 81.2 73.0 Plant (First 3 Units) West Branch Dam Ohio April 1963 6.7 5.5 Angat Dam and Power Philippines Dec. 1962 23.7 18.9 Plant Sam Rayburn Power- Texas May 1962 10.9 10.8 house and Outlet Works Mangla Spillway (4) West Pakistan Oct. 1961 72.0 61.0 Canaveral Diversion Honduras June 1961 5.4 5.3 Works and Power Plant Guayjoyo Diversion El Salvador May 1961 2.7 1.9 Works and Power Plant Summersville Dam West Virginia May 1961 15.9 15.9 Pearl River Dam Mississippi May 1960 7.0 6.7 Guayabo 4th Unit EL Salvador May 1959 0.9 1.2 Power Plant Addition Wanapum Dam and Washington May 1959 66.9 59.5 Power Plant Boulder Creek Power Utah Dec. 1956 1.3 1.2 Plant NOTE: (4) Portion of accepted $354-million low bid for total project. Low bid for spillway portion was $54.5 million of a total project bid of $373-million. -5- HARZA TABULATION OF COST ESTIMATING DATA FOR MAJOR PROJECTS (Amounts Shown in Millions of Dollars) (Continued) Engineer's Date of Estimate for Project Location Bids Civil Works Low Bid Priest Rapids Dam Washington March 1956 64.4 57.4 and Power Plant Derbendi Khan Dam Iraq Aug. 1955 36.8 32.1 Gavins Point Power- South Dakota Jan. 1953 12.0 11.3 house Ambuklao Dam and Philippines Dec. 1952 24.6 22.1 Power Plant Blakely Mountain Arkansas May 1952 553 4.9 Powe rhouse Box Canyon Dam Washington March 1952 8.0 7.6 and Power Plant Guayabo Dam and EL Salvador July 1950 10.8 9.9 Power Plant 40. CST 1 February 1981 | ! ; TCV a ee, LJ a _— SS ate , *, [ (MOUNT LOCAL (OI ~ os rea : . i tn g tMOI~ | yt ZIOMIZING STEAM i “| Saris (ST eaten Ss x oD DO HEL PER SPEC. fo" PL 4 @ pa 2K 2°) ed < iat 4 Q* 1 “at xHS DESUPERHEATER SEL SAT Mt-/ 2. FOKe Phi CESUP HHAGRAM PRESSURE ELOUEING WIATIONM _ BCOLBS a ' 45 . ennneara 3, __] { | sy SPACE HEATING i) Stee See" Le 7x Aad? SHEETS r ce j i TTS { | ne ce YALE, SET SO" QL: AELIDY Gia BOE : SONTIN GLE VGC 1D SVAMNEN if LAB. STEFANO & ASSOCIATE: 'S CONSULTIN LTI NG [| || fro | ( sracse & | | ee 2 Kee Ralph Stefano is the president and principal engineer of Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. He directs and supervises proj- ects involving power and energy plants, design and construction of commercial buildings, port facilities, mechanical and electrical designs, and feasibility studies of all types. Prior to establishing Stefano & Associates in 1957, Mr. Stefano worked as a mechanical field engineer for a Seattle and Fairbanks based engineering firm. He specialized in construction of power plants and utilities and became deeply involved with the Alaskan environment and building problems. His experience prior to that, included design and installation of shore and ship-based refrigera- tion plants, and design and construction of boiler plants in Seattle, Washington. He has been a practicing engineer for 25 years, holds a degree from Washington State University, and is a registered profes- sional engineer in the states of Alaska and Washington. Mr. Stefano is a member of numerous professional groups, in- cluding the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, of which he is the Alaskan Representative, and the Alaska Society of Profes- sional Engineers. In the past, he has served on the Alaska State Board of Engineers and Architects Examiners. Mr. Stefano is a pioneer Alaskan and brings 34 years of Alaskan experience to the firm. RALPH R. STEFANO, RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES Established before Alaska became a state, Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. (formerly Stefano & Associates, Inc.), was one of the first companies to specialize in the engineering problems created by the Alaskan environment. Our goal is to provide efficient and effective designs for buildings, utility systems, power plants and other special-function structures for arctic and sub-arctic areas. Our designs are based on years of research and experience under Alaskan conditions of all kinds. Many fixed concepts of design have been altered to raise construction standards for Alaska. By so doing, we have provided maximum space, comfort, machinery operation, and maintenance at the lowest overall costs. In these pages, we hope to acquaint you with the wide range of services and expertise offered by our organization. In addition, we have included a brief resume of the technical backgrounds of our highly skilled engineers. Extensive experience and a highly qualified staff enable Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. to provide the most effective solutions possible to Alaskan engineering problems. oy 2S PSIC STEAM TO TURBINE LABYRINTH PACHUME PIONEER IN ALASKAN ENGINEERING. RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS eager i LLP. Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. prepared oil spill preven- OIL SPILL PREVENTIO tion and control reports, following Environmental Protection Agency guidelines, for eight villages of the Alaska Village Electrical Cooperative (AVEC) in the Bethel area. < es ai The study conducted for Usibelli Coal Mines in 1964 was POWER PLANT instrumental in establishing the feasibility of the mine mouth power plant at Healy, Alaska, generating plant. Engineering and Economic Studies for City of Anchorage — 1970. Generation Study In Association with R. W. Beck & Associates. We conducted a study of the possibilities of using the geo- GEOTHERMAL STUDY thermal resources at Pilgrim Springs for furnishing heat and power to the city of Nome, and have presented papers con- cerning utilization of these resources at various West Coast Geothermal Councils. The village of Wainwright used our services for a study of possible power generation and village heating utilizing local COAL FEASIBILITY coal reserves. The generation and distribution system is planned to utilize the Federal ‘‘“MIUS’’ concept (Modular Integrated Utilities System). Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. is preparing a study for PORT FACILITIES the North Slope Borough for a proposed port facility at Barrow and did a preliminary study for the city of Nome. A facility was designed and built for the city of Dillingham. Our firm worked with eight villages of the North SlopeCAPITAL Borough on a long range capital improvement program. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDIES RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS $n G AND POWE: | Rl . 2 mene a” Se = Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. had total responsibility YF AT] N for the design and construction management of the Univer- sity of Alaska heating and power plant at Fairbanks. Con- sisting of: 2 — 50,000 Lbs./Hr. Boilers, 600 psi, 750° F.TT 1 — 100,000 Lbs./Hr. Boilers, 600 psi, 750° F. TT 2 — 1500 KW Steam Turbine Generators Ralph Stefano has also been responsible for the following design responsibility. Ladd Air Force Base South Power Plant Modifications a. Pressure Filter Installation. b. Combustion Air. c. Coal Conveyor and unloading system. d. Cooling water system to condensors. e. 6 — 120,000 Lbs./Hr. 400 psi, Boiler setting modifications including masonry. North Power Plant Modifications a. 120,000 Lbs./Hr. Boiler, 400 psi, 650° F.TT. b. Condensor Injector Modification. c. Coal Conveyor Modification. d. General Plant Modification. Eielson Air Force Base Power Plant a. Surface condensor installation for 2 — 2500 KW Murray Steam Turbine Generators. b. Switchgear Modifications for 69 KV tie with GVEA and Ladd AFB. c. Combustion Air Modifications for 6 — 120,000 Lbs./Hr. Boilers. d. Coal and ash handling system modifications. e. General Plant modifications including fire protection system. : ne ~~ 3 POWER SYSTERi RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATE CONSULTING ENGINEERS | = a cmnenilene! nN = 10. li 125 ONONOOS Kodiak N.A.S. Fairbanks Interna- tional Airport Unalakleet Electric Association Fort Greely Eielson AFB Tyonek Adak, N.A.S. Point Barrow Dillingham Plant Modifications GVEA/University of Alaska Naknek Electric Association Nome, City of 7 — 750 KW Worthington Units 2 — 200 KW Units 1 — 60 KW Caterpillar Unit 1 — 100 KW Caterpillar Unit 1 — 300 KW Chicago Pneumatic Unit 3 — 1000 KW Enterprise Units 3 — 1000 KW Fairbanks-Morse Units 1 — 2000 KW ALCO Unit 2 — 2000 KW Fairbanks-Morse Units 1 — 500 KW Chicago Pneumatic Unit 1 — 500 KW CP 1 — 350 KW Enterprise 1 — 300 KW Enterprise 1 — 200 KW Enterprise 2 — 3000 KW Fairbanks-Morse Units 4 — Waste Heat Recovery Boilers 1 — 1000 KW Fairbanks-Morse Unit 1 — 1233 KW Cooper-Bessemer Unit POWER SYSTEM RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS NOTE: bess, FORK CONTINVATION “%2 SIPING VSCe BLSe SEE DZaW as V-1ED | > O MEG WORTHING TW i be GAS TURRINE SSS SS acts ad A Ma bos 5 te OR | POWE? PLANT Tyonek Indians Power Plant 10,000 KW Gas Turbine — Generator 2,000 KW Diesel GAS TURBINES City of Fairbanks 7,000 KW Gas Turbine with Waste Heat Recovery Boiler Golden Valley Electric Assn. 18,000 KW Gas Turbine — Generator C.1.E.A. Power System 1 - 56,000 KW Gas Turbine — Beluga Plant 1 - 20,000 KW Gas Turbine — Kenai Plant POWER SYSTEMS RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS wind-powered electrical generation system for this village. This unique project is due for completion in the summer of 1975. Our firm has designed and constructed two small diesel elec- \/j LLAGE trical generators with distribution systems for the village of ELECTRIFICATION Anaktuvuk Pass. This system provides the first electricity available to the entire village. Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. served as general con- NOME POWER SYSTEN sultant for the city of Nome Sewer, Water and Electric Systems. We prepared a preliminary report and are presently designing W/ASTE HEAT a waste heat recovery system for the Naknek Electric Asso- RECOVERY ciation’s Power Plant in Naknek, Alaska, to provide lower cost heating for the school at Naknek and better utilization of the fuel consumed for generation of electricity. POWER SYSTEMS RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS DET Er igen Ee 4 amen iy mee We are responsible for the design of the mechanical and elec- OFFICE trical systems for the North Slope Borough Administration Building in Barrow, and other buildings throughout the state. AND COMMERCIAL Included below are some of our projects: BUILDINGS Hotel and apartment complex — Bethel Dillingham Hotel — Dillingham South Wire Center — Anchorage Telephone Utility Fisher Building — Anchorage Mony Building — Anchorage Ralph Stefano & Associates, Inc. has designed mechanical FO DUCA TIONAL systems for the following educational facilities: FACI LIT] ES Bristol Bay School District Studies University Park School — Fairbanks Anaktuvuk Pass School — Anaktuvuk Pass Career Education Center — Anchorage West High School Swimming Pool — Anchorage With the continued growth of the state Ralph Stefano has MAAEDICAL FACILITIES played an important role with the development of new hos- pital and clinic projects including: Lake Otis Medical Center — Anchorage Central Peninsula General Hospital — Soldotna University of Alaska Dental Clinic — Anchorage Harbor View Memorial Hospital — Valdez Alaska Medical Laboratories — Anchorage Kodiak Hospital Addition Under Design Proposed New Hospital for Nome COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS \ + la —_ ¢ a With the continued industrial growth throughout the state in DOCK AND COLD diversified fields, Ralph Stefano & Associates has provided engineering services to assist in the growth of several STORAGE FACILITIES industries: Yakutat Dock & Cold Storage Facility Dillingham Dock Extension Seward Boat Harbor Electrical Distribution Carr-Gottstein Cold Storage Plant — Anchorage — Northwest Airlines Flight Kitchen — Anchorage AVIATION Collier Carbon Chemical Co. PETRO CHEMICAL CO5 Sulfinal Stripper Modifications COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS RALPH STEFANO & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS, Generator Addition UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS, Generator Addition H UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS, Generator Addition ————— Trin = ee = ee 8 / lene ro | E ye = RUA TRAM UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS, Generator Addition UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS, Generator Addition POWER GENERATION AND HEATING PLANT PROJECTS Completed Or Under Construction STEFANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Anchorage, Alaska DIESEL PLANTS 1. 2. 3 ONAL 10. 1. 12. Kodiak N.A.S. Fairbanks Int'l. Airport Unatakleet Electric Assoc. Fort Greely Eielson AFB Tyonek . Adak, N.A.S. Dillingham Plant Modifications GVEA/University of Alaska Nome, City of Seward, City of THERMAL PLANTS oi. MHS MOH eSBs SH wWwWHHHPL 750 KW Worthington Units 200 KW Units 60 KW Caterpillar Units 100 KW Caterpillar Unit 300 KW Chicago Pneumatic Unit 1000 KW Enterprise Units 1000 KW Fairbanks Morse Units 2000 KW ALCO Unit 2000 KW Chicago Pneumatic Unit 500 KW CP 350 KW Enterprise 300 KW Enterprise 200 KW Enterprise 3000 KW Fairbanks-Morse Units - 1000 KW Fairbanks-Morse Unit 1233 KW Cooper-Bessmer Unit 2000 KW ALCO Units University of Alaska - Power and Heating Plant 50,000#/Hr Boilers, 600 psi. 750°F.TT 2- 1- 2 - 1 1000,000#/Hr Boilers, 600 psi. 750°F.TT 2000 KW Steam Turbine Generators 10,000 KW Steam Turbine Generator (under construction) Ladd Air Force Base (Ft. Wainwright, Fairbanks) South Power Plant Modifications onandnTdm Pressure Filter Installation Combustion Air Coal Conveyor and unloading system Cooling water system to condensers. 6 - 120,000#/Hr., 400 psi. boiler setting modifications including masonry. North Power Plant Modifications 120,000#/Hr Boiler, 400 psi. 650°F.TT a. b. c. d. Condenser Injector Modification Coal Conveyor Modification General Plant Modification 4. Eielson Air Force Base Power Plant a. Surface condenser installation fo4 2 - 2500 KW Murray Steam Turbine Generators. Switchgear Modifications for 69 KV Tie with GVEA and Ladd AFB. Combustion Air Modifications for 6 - 120,000#/Hr. Boilers Coal and ash handling system modifications. General Plant modifications including fire protection system. Furnace modifications---Arch and Rear Seals for 6 - 120,000#/Hr. boilers. 5. Golden Valley Electric Association Steam Power Plant - Steam Header System modifications. 6. City of Anchorage Combined Cycle Plant -- 33 MW - Gas Turbine - 40 MW Steam Turbine Construction Management Engineer. Waste Water Treatment System Thermal Report Start-Up Engineer Plant Freeze-Up Prevention Design Boiler Gas Duct Modifications. 7. City of Fairbanks Steam Distribution System - 2 projects. M.U.S. Power Plant Particulate Control. M.U.S. Plant Ash Disposal System Modification. M.U.S. Plant Instrumentation Upgrade. Hot Water District Heating Study and Design. >ADAON ST AOPwNnm— arPwn— GAS TURBINES 1. Tyonek Indians Power Plant 10,000 KW Gas Turbine - Generator 2,000 KW Diesel 2. City of Fairbanks ~ 7,000 KW Gas Turbine with 3000#/Hr. Waste Heat Recovery Boiler consultant to Wyatt & Kipper Engineers. STUDIES 1. Mine Mouth Power Plant Study - 1961 - Usibelli Mining Co., Inc. 2. Central Alaska Power Study - 1961 - Central Alaska Power Pool. Composed of: Chugach Electric Association, Inc. City of Anchorage City of Seward Homer Electric Association, Inc. Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. Special Consultant to Parsons Company 3. Alaska Power Feasibility Study - 1962 - Same as 2 above but including: City of Fairbanks Copper Valley Electric Association, Inc. Mine Mouth Power Plant - 1964 - Fairbanks Greater Area Feasibility Study. Engineering and Economic Studies for City of Anchorage - 1970 Distribution Study Generation Study Finance Study In Association with R. W. Beck & Associates. Evaluation Report - Sutton Electrical Center, Sutton, Alaska For Power Development Committee, Palmer, Alaska 150 MW Plant Study at Healy, Alaska - 1-76 for Alaska International Industries. Electric Power in Alaska - 1975 - 1995 for 1976 Legislature Budget Audit Committee in association with University of Alaska Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. Conceptual design and report for waste heat recovery line wide pumping at 10 pump stations. FACILITIES DESIGN EXPERIENCE lie rm ANDOAHW Union Collier Chemical Plant - Kenai Plant- Modifications ranging from sulfonal stripper turnaround re-design to renovation and expansion of office building - 1974 - 1978. Chugach Electric Association, Plant, formerly Alaska Railroad. Anchorage Plant - 2 boilers, 3 turbines - 1948 Washington State University - 1 boiler - 1946 Dutch Harbor N.A.S., Alaska - 6 boilers, 3 turbines - 1942 Kodiak, N.A.S., Alaska - 6 boilers, 3 turbines - 1942 Sitka, N.A.S., Alaska - 3 boilers, 2 turbines - 1942 Ladd AFB, North and South Plants, Alaska - 6 boilers, 4 turbines - 1949 University of Washington - 1 boiler - 1949 CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE - as an employee, at the following plants: le Oa Si. 4. 1 - 30,000#/Hr Boiler - Washington State University - 1947, Boilermaker. 2-30,000#/Hr Boilers - Washington State University - 1950. Assistant Superintendent. 2-100,000#/Hr Boilers - Lewiston, Idaho - 1950, Assistant Superintendent. Ladd Air Force Base - 195] - 1956 South Plant 6 - 120,000#/hr 400 psi boilers - mechanical engineer-design field 4 - 5,000 KW Steam Turbines - mechanical engineer-design/field 1 - 2,500 KW Steam Turbines North Plant 1 - 120,000#/Hr 400 psi boiler - field engineer 5. Eielson Air Force Base - 1952 - 1956 2-120,000#/Hr Boilers - Field Engineer 1 - 5,000 KW Turbine CITY OF NOME UTILITIES ENGINEER Responsible for all generation and distribution, design and system modifications 1972 to 1975 including certification for all bond con- trolled expenditures. CITY OF CORDOVA PUBLIC UTILITIES New transformation outdoor oi] 5000 KVA 12470Y/7200HV unit purchased through AMFAC, Anchorage. CURRENT INDUSTRIAL CLIENT PROJECTS 1. © Usibelli Coal Mine -- GVEA System Peak Shaver Building Foundation Pedestal for 45 Ton Flywheel & Motor Generator Set (under construction) Union 0i1 Company -- 350 BBL self-contained fire tube snow melter design for Hercules Transportation City of Fairbanks -- District Heating Hot Water System Heat Source Design - utilizes waste heat (extraction steam) from three steam turbine generators. Gavora Incorporated -- 0i1 conversion to coal fired heating plant. RFP 3d WASTE HEAT RECAPTURE PROJECTS IN ALASKA University of Alaska Power Plant a. Bearing cooling water heats campus water supply. b. Boiler radiation losses heat ventilation air for plant. c. Radiation losses heat glycol for ice free roll-up doors - 1963. Diesel Generation at Naknek Electric Association, Jacket water recovery heats high school and grade school complex, 1970. Diesel Generation - City of Nome. Water recovery heats city water supply adjacent to plant. Anaktuvuk Pass Village - 2 projects - 1973. a. Community building adjacent to diesel plant heated by jacket water recovery. -b. High school air supply for ventilation heated by jacket water heat recovery. Tyonek gas turbine waste heat recovery for greenhouse application - 1975. City of Kenai, diesel plant jacket water recovery for greenhouse heating. City of Fairbanks, waste heat recapture from 7MW gas turbine to provide steam for generation and steam district heating - 1961. City of Fairbanks, waste heat recapture of 20,000 1b. steam per hour; 20,000 1b. steam per hour, turbine extraction steam to heat 200 homes, and reduce the heat rejected to cooling water and the Chena River - 1980--81. City of Anchorage, waste heat recapture from 33MW gas turbine to provide 13.7 MW from a steam turbine and heat 10,000,000 gallons of city water with condenser circulating water - 1977--79. Alyeska Pipeline Co. - waste heat recapture at 10 pump stations, steam produced in a waste heat recovery boiler drives a turbine- driven line pump. Turbine exhaust is condensed in a heat exchanger, using the bottom cycle effectively to heat the pipeline crude - 1979-80. Union Oil, Kenai Waste heat recovery of 5 saturn solar gas turbines to generate process steam. DARBYSHIRE & ASSOCIATES. INC. 420 "L" Street. Suite 403 Anchorage. Alaska 99501 (907) 279-5443 Darbyshire & Associates, Inc. is a firm specializing in rural community planning and management consulting. Since its start in early 1977. the firm has been responsible for the following projects: PROJECTS COMPLETED o Prepared land management programs for Bethel Native Corporation, Dot Lake Native Corporation and Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation. These projects assisted the corporations in: identifying aerial photos, base maps and other working tools needed in the day-to-day management of lands; adopting policies for meeting required ANCSA Sec. 14(c) (1), (2), (3) and (4) land reconveyances; and setting up land recordkeeping and mapping systems for handling the day-to-day administration of hundreds of thousands of acres; developing shareholder homesite programs; and developing staffing and operational plans for meeting continued land management responsibilities. o Assisted Tetlin Native Corporation in reviewing BLM's Draft Decision of Interim Conveyance (DDIC) on Tetlin's 750,000-acre selection. This review identified errors of commission and omission by BLM, presented Tetlin with an understanding of the issues (e.g., selection rights, easements, navigability) contained in the DDIC, and suggested courses of action for resolving the identified issues. o Provided socioeconomic/site location analysis input into McGrath Dock Feasibility study. © Developed an analysis of the pro's and con's for municipal reclassification by the city of Bethel. © McGRATH COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Project elements include: physical. biological and natural resources inventories and analyses; created-resource inventory and analysis; community facilities and services inventory and analysis; socioeconomic inventory and analysis; analysis of Prospects and capacity for growth; an ANCSA 14(c) (3) reconveyance program; a relocation feasibility study; 1 planning design determinants; plans for housing, transportation, land use and community facilities and services; and a city administrative plan. BETHEL CITY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Project elements included: aerial photo/base mapping; community attitudinal and socioeconomic surveys and analyses; preparation of community goals and objectives; physical and natural resource inventories and analyses; created-resource inventory and analysis; plans for land use, housing, community facilities and services, and communications; a plan implementation strategy; and a city administration plan. Prepared a work program/strategy for the development of a private corporation's multi-million-dollar industrial properties on the Alaska Peninsula. AVCP REGIONAL GOVERNMENT STUDY - PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM, Details scope, content- budget, schedule and responsibilities for completing a borough feasibility study of the 58-community lower Yukon-Kuskokwim area of Alaska. Developed an automated economic model for use as a policy, planning and management tool for economic, resource, cnvironmental-. and community development Planners and managers. The model provides for an understanding of the workings of a local economy that is more thorough than traditional study methods--but at a comparable cost- And, because it is automated (computerized), it can continue to be used to test expected impacts from expected economic change-~-without requiring a whole new study. Modeled the Bethel. city economy as part of our comprehensive community development planning effort. Based on a survey of businesses at Bethel, developed a ‘profile and 10-year forecast for the economy on: industry income; employment; employment seasonality; occupational skills; sources of income; economic base multipliers, etc. Developed a series of community profiles for 6 villages located in the upper Tanana region of Alaska: Delta Junction. Dot Lake, Northway. Tanacross, Tetlin and Tok. These profiles provide basic socioeconomic planning and community development information on each of the communities. : YUKON-KUSKOKWIM COASTAL RESOURCE SERVICE AREA WORK PROGRAM. Includes a detailed description of the products 2 © ‘that should result from a coastal management planning effort. Also explains the methodology that should be followed in preparing the products and suggests a time schedule and budget for completing the work. NANA COASTAL RESOURCE SERVICE AREA WORK PROGRAM, Includes a detailed description of the products that should result from a coaStal management planning effort. Also explains the methodology that should be followed in preparing the products and suggests a time schedule and budget for completing the work. Prepared the socioeconomic, community profile, and public participation work elements of the WHITTIER ACCESS STUDY. Developed a series of community profiles for 25 villages located in the lower Yukon River and middle Kuskokwim River regions of Alaska: Aniak, Chuathbaluk, Crooked Creek, Georgetown, Lime Village. Lower Kalskag, Napaimute. Red Devil. Sleetmute- Stony River. Upper Kalskag, Alakanuk, Chevak, Emmonak, Fortuna Ledge (Marshall), Hooper Bay- Kotlik, Mountain Village. Pilot Station, Pitkas Point, Russian Mission, St. Mary's, Andreafsky, Scammon Bay. and.Sheldon Point. These profiles provide basic socioeconomic planning and community development information on each of the communities. MCGRATH COMMUNITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES. AND HOUSING SURVEY ANALYSIS. This report was prepared as the first step in developing a comprehensive community development plan for McGrath. NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH REGIONAL PLANNING STUDY DESIGN. This study sets forth a detailed program for carrying out the North Slope Borough's regional planning responsibilities. YUKON FLATS REGIONAL GOVERNMENT STUDY. Designed to assist residents of the.area in their deliberation on the question of borough incorporation, the study covers: local government options; standards for incorporation; - borough cost estimates; potential revenue sources; regional government alternatives; and the implications for regional self-determination. The study is seen aS a prototype for evaluating government feasibility for the unorganized borough in Alaska. Planned all work associated with the relocation of the village of Point Lay. This includes: a POINT LAY RELOCATION WORK PROGRAM/SCHEDULE/BUDGET; selection of the new townsite; layout of the new town; and planning 3 implementation activities associated with ANCSA Sec. 14(c) land transfers, site preparation; programming the move, etc. © Analyzed local government public service capabilities and potential management problems in the Kenai Peninsula Borough and the cities of Homer. Seldovia. Kenai and Soldotna- This was completed under contract to CH2M Hill-Alaska in its preparation of a report entitled, OFFSHORE OIL DEVELOPMENT IN COOK INLET- IMPLICATIONS FOR THE KENAI PENINSULA. o Analyzed North Slope Borough development codes. This was done under contract to the Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission. PROJECTS IN PROGRESS © Assisting Fairbanks North Star Borough develop land Management program- Work consists of: identifying program requirements; necessary land management tools; preparation of land capability analysis; identifying site planning/improvement requirements; suggesting a long-range land disposal system; suggesting a land record erent developing forms for use in day-to-day administration of lands program; and suggesting staff and budgetary requirements for the continued administration of the borough's land management program, o Assisting Tetlin Native Corporation as corporate Management consultants. Includes: coordinating the Corporation's ANCAB appeals; coordinating financial and business developinent activities; managing corporation lands; negotiating land leases, rights-of-way. mineral contracts, etc. © Neveloping an automated regional economic model for the NANA region. © Preparing a NANA region Coastal Management Program. Oo Preparing a feasibility study for the incorporation of a borough government in the lower Yukon-Kuskokwim area of Alaska. o Developing a land use development plan for Chenega Native Corporation's 76.000-acre landholding in Prince William Sound. ° Preparing a Tyonek/Beluga Impact analysis summary community profile, needs assessment and continuing planning work program schedule and budget. Before the formation of Darbyshire & Associates, Inc., our personnel had additional experience in Alaska, which included: ° Preparation of a townsite development plan for the new town of Atkasook in the North Slope Borough. Completion of interim village land use plans for the communities of Point Hope, Wainwright, Nuiqsut, Kaktovik and Anaktuvuk Pass. Development of comprehensive plans for the city of Kotzebue and the communities of English Bay, Port Graham and Tyonek,. Assistance in the preparation of comprehensive plans for Angoon. Cordova and Yakutat- Advisory assistance to the city of Yakutat in planning for and »anaging expected oil industry activity and population growth related to outer continental shelf development. Assistance to communities in the drafting and implementation of zoning and subdivision ordinances, including the cities of Wrangell. Yakutat and Dillingham, Fairbanks North Star Borough. and the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Preparation of a land management strategy for the city of Pelican. Completion of a socioeconomic impact analysis of the effects of logging on the community of Tenakee Springs, Alaska. Preparation of "industrial profile" material as part of the State of Alaska's GULF OF ALASKA OCS HANDBOOK. ee a THE GROUP The background and expertise of the principals of The Renewable Energy Group reflect a wide range of disciplines related to the energy field. We believe that this collective mix of talents of- fers our clients the opportunity to examine a broader range of solutions. Mark Newell is a wind energy engineer with over six years utility experience. His training as a civil engineer has given him a broad energy background which he complements well with practical Alaskan experience in remote areas. As president of Wind Systems Engineering and now the Renewable Energy Group he has proven himself a capable project and personnel manager. Mr. Newell's expertise in wind energy has taken him to every region of the state where he has designd over a dozen wind systems. He is qualified as an energy planner, having done village and regional planning in the Norton Sound, Bristol Bay and NANA regions. Co-author of the Alaskan Wind Energy Handbook, he has taught seminars, workshops and credit courses in renewable energy to both non-technical and pro- fessional groups throughout the state. James Barkshire is a solar designer and energy consultant with over a decade of experience in the construction field. He has designed several of the first passive solar homes in Southcentral Alaska, and has been involved as a consultant on dozens of energy conserving and solar building projects throughout the state. Most recently he was managing principal of Alaska Renewable Energy Associates, involved in research and planning work. Major projects include the Railbelt Electrical Alternatives Study and the Pribilof Island School District Energy Planning Study. He is an educator who has taught workshops around the state as well as classes at Anchorage Community College, and has published several technical papers and reports on renewable energy development in Alaska. Bill McDonald is an energy systems analyst with a strong background in computers. He is an electrical designer specializing in wind- generators, and has five years experience as an electrician throughout bush Alaska. Well qualified as a skilled technician and programmer, Mr. McDonald's responsibilities include microprocessor based data collection systems and software development. He is also a profi- cient technical researcher and writer. PROJECTS Bristol Bay Wind Energy Feasibility Assesment Unalakleet Electrical Cooperative Wind Farm Project Sheldon Point Individual Home/Attached Windgenerators Pilot Station Wind Energy Project Skagway Wind Farm Demonstration Project Reconnaissance Study of Energy Alternative for Shungnak, Kiana and Ambler Alaskan Wind Energy Handbook Adak Elementary School Wind Demonstration Project Nelson Lagoon Utility Intertie Monitoring System Village Scale Integrated Energy System Alaska Railbelt Electrical Alternatives Study Pribilof Island School District Planning Study Renewable Energy Workshops in 10 Major Alaskan Communities Weeldreyer Solar Home Design Schlief Solar House Design CLIENTS State Division of Energy and Power Development Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Alaska Army National Guard City of Pilot Station City of Skagway Unalakleet Valley Electrical Co-op Northwest Community College Alaska Power Authority Graham Associates Architects Bering Straits Native Corporation S&S Electric Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories Pribilof Island School District Western Solar Utilization Network (Western Sun} North Slope Borough For more information phone (907) 274-2627 or write The Renewable Energy Group 1551 East Tudor, Anchorage, AK 99507 The PAE Energy Group The Renewable Energy Group is an engineer- ing consulting firm primarily involved in the design and planning of renewable energy related pro- jects. Formerly known as Wind Systems Engineering, Inc., we have changed our name to reflect the broadening of our scope and capabilities. We are not in the business of selling and are not affiliated with any specific manufacturers of alternative energy products. This policy is main- tained for the purpose of providing our clients with what we perceive to be the best system for their individual applications. The Renewable Energy Group ¢ WIND ENGINEERING ¢ SOLAR DESIGN e ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSULTING e ENERGY PLANNING AND ECONOMICS APPROACH Our approach to a client's energy needs is to use technologies which will provide the best return on investment. We have found that through use of the available local resources a balance bet- ween increasing end use efficiency and produc- tion of renewable energy can give the best overall return. An important precept we follow is to match the scale of the energy system to the needs and abilities of the client to maintain it. We emphasize education and training as an impor- tant step in the design process. BACKGROUND The principals of The Renewable Energy Group collectively have designed more alter- native energy systems than any other firm in the state. We have projects working in every region, from Southeastern to the Aleutians to the Arc- tic. The firm has considerable experience with data processing and microprocessor technology and their application to renewable energy systems. We have specialized in regional and village scale energy planning, and in providing resource and technology assessments. CAPABILITIES SITE ANALYSIS We offer detailed site surveys as the first step in the design process. Our experience with state of the art tools and techniques for solar and wind analysis is combined with professional judgement to determine the optimum siting for a clients project. We adhere to the theory of microclimate design, to ensure that all factors affecting a site are taken into account. DESIGN ABILITIES We have several years of practical Alaskan ex- perience in designing windgenerator systems in remote bush areas. Our systems design in- cludes electrical conservation and load manage- ment coupled to a wind system. We also provide complete design services for energy conserving and/or passive solar homes and small commer- cial buildings. PROJECT COORDINATION AND INSPECTION We follow through on our design services by working closely with a client during the construc- tion phase. Assistance in construction contract preparation, contractor selection, and inspec- tion of work in progress can be provided. This service is essential for achieving continuity on a project from idea to reality. FINAL REPORT AND MANUAL PREPARATION A final report evaluates a project at completion and provides a reference point for further im- provements in performance. The operations and maintenance manual is critical to the success of many projects, as it gives the user a guide on how to make the system work effectively. We have a strong background in preparing both types of publications. TRAINING AND WORKSHOPS Our firm has been a leader throughout Alaska in educating people on the uses of renewable energy systems and hardware. We can provide clients with several levels of service in this area: a general introduction to altenative energy technologies to both large and small groups, detailed workshops on a particular techonology, or actual hands-on training for a system we have designed. ENERGY PLANNING AND ECONOMICS We have experience as the lead firm in both village and regional scale energy planning. We also provide technical support to larger engineering companies on feasibility studies. All of our work is based around hard engineering economics, allowing a client to choose what he feels will be the best return on his investment. } Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center 707 A Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA AEIDC PUBLICATIONS July 1981 The Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEIDC), a research unit of the Universi- ty of Alaska, was established in 1972 by the Alaska State Legislature. The major objective of AEIDC is to provide referral to and dissemination of resource information about arctic regions with emphasis on the Alaskan environment. AEIDC has three complementary staff groups: Information Services, Science and Resources, and Graphics and Production. The Information Services staff provides information referral, continually develops and maintains specialized information files, and conducts information retrieval and dissemination. Requests for information are received and answered from federal, state, and municipal government agencies; universities and other schools; consulting firms; industry; Native organizations; libraries; journal- ists; lawyers; insurance agents; and the public. AEIDC’s collection of 8,000 documents includes materials that are unpublished, out-of-print, or generally unavailable elsewhere in Alaska. Micro- fiche copy or hardcopy is available for the cost of reproduction for those materials not restricted by copyright. The Alaska Climate Center, an integral part of Information Services, has available climate data and publications from the early 1900's to the present including all surface weather observations since 1969. AEIDC offers complete microfiche services including processing, editing, and duplication. Information retrieval and dissemination are augmented by computer- ized data bases, A list of special collections available on microfiche and a description of AEIDC’s data bases are attached. The multidisciplinary Resource and Science Services staff responds to a variety of requests for applied problem solving through research and information analysis. In addition to assisting Information Services with public inquiries, the science staff also conducts contractual studies for government, industry, and Native corporations, These activities generally include a literature survey, an on-site examination, and a summary of factual findings with appropriate graphic and map presentations, A list of reports produced since 1972 is attached. The AEIDC Graphics and Production staff supports the others by displaying information in the most effective format for its intended use. The Graphics staff also provides advisory and con- tractual services to those needing assistance on resource and scientific graphics, mapping tech- niques, and publication options. ny PHONE (907) 279-4523 SECTION B: MINING INDUSTRY CAPABILITIES DAMES & MOORE INTRODUCTION Dames & Moore has served as a consultant to the mining industry since 1938. Initially, only civil engineering services were provided, but over the years the firm's capabilities were expanded to include a wide range of geological, environmental, and mining engineering professional services. In the middle and late 1970's, the firm acquired a staff of geologists and mining engineers with industry experience in coal and lignite. Consequently, the company now has a considerable body of experience in these fields. Over 50 geologists, mining engineers, and mineral economists are now available to work on these projects. The capabilities and experience of Dames & Moore's personnel comprise both prior work with exploration and mining companies, and subsequent consulting work with the firm. Clients have various motives for asking Dames & Moore to perform consulting work in coal and lignite. Some of these reasons are as follows: ® Client lacks technical capability to perform work, e- Client has in-house expertise but desires outside opinion before committing funds, or e Potential customer or bank providing loan desires third party opinion from competent firm. CONSULTING SERVICES IN COAL AND LIGNITE Dames & Moore has the capability to perform the following tasks in the areas of coal and lignite: e Geological field reconnaissance (mapping, sampling, etc.) of prospective coal and lignite properties; @ Geologic and reserve audits: objective and detailed reviews of the quality of the data base, prior interpretation of specific deposits, and reserve calculations; e@ Detailed subsurface investigations (including supervision. of drilling programs) to explore for and prove out reserves; ~ @ Geological interpretation of surface and subsurface data preparatory to mine planning; e Detailed independent coal and lignite reserve calculations; e Evaluation of mining methods and sizing of operations; .@ Mine layout, plant design, and equipment selection; ® Economic analyses including necessary capital investment, operating costs, projected cash flow, net present value, and return on invest- ment; @ Market analyses, supply-demand and transportation analyses studies; and e Baseline environmental studies and interpretations for state and federal mine permit application requirements. Many of our clients prefer to make their own geological studies and control their own exploration programs. In these cases, the client's data are used to calculate ore reserves and to make the other required studies and analyses. Dames & Moore, however, is capable of conducting studies on coal and lignite properties from the exploration stage onward. (For additional information concerning Dames & Moore experience in the mining industry, please refer to Appendix A of this proposal.) SECTION C: EXPERIENCE Dames & Moore is a multidisciplinary firm whose experience in earth science, engineering, economics, and ecology spans the past four decades. To serve its clients, Dames & Moore maintains more than 40 offices throughout the world. The company's Alaska operation began in 1970 in Anchorage and was subsequently extended to Fairbanks, Homer, and Valdez as projects demanded. To date, Dames & Moore has concluded more than 1000 Alaska-based projects involving virtually every scientific discipline represented by the firm's professional staff. Dames & Moore has conducted more than 200 coal studies of the type required, on a worldwide basis. Three recently completed projects of a similar nature that represent our experience are: Project 1 Project Name: Sabine River Authority of Texas Date of Completion: Testimony Continuing Location of Project: Quitman, Texas Contract Cost: >$300 ,000 Client: Sabine River Authority of Texas Mr. W. C. Swearingen - Project Manager (214) 878-2262 Description of The project involved delineation of lignite reserves Project Scope: underlying more than 30,000 acres within the Lake Fork Reservoir. Over 300 holes were drilled and cored, the quality of the seams was determined, and the seams were correlated and reserves calculated by depth and strip- ping ratio. Mineable reserves were calculated to determine optimum recoveries by various mining methods including dragline, truck and shovel, and bucket-wheel Key Members of Project Team: Project Name: ° Date of Completion: Location of Project: Contract Cost: Client: Description of Project Scope: Key Members of Project Team: excavator. Market and maximum sales prices were determined and transportation systems analyzed. Capital and operating costs were calculated and the net-present value of the reserves was then determined. B. J. Guarnera, J. F. Abshier, B. G. Randolph, S. M. Keller, J. D. Lewis Project 2 Determination of coal reserves January 1980 Northwest Colorado, Southwest Wyoming, Northern New Mexico, and Utah >$2 300,000 United States Geological Survey Mr. James Peterson - Now with U.S. Water & Power Resources Services (303) 234-4157 The projects consisted of compiling information on coal deposits on federal lands for potential leasing. Outcrops, mines, and well information were plotted on topographic maps. Isopachs were constructed and re- serves by various depths calculated. The information gained is being published as a series of open file reports. B. G. Randolph, P. C. Mosch, D. L.- Hinrichs, R. D. Bartlett SECTION D: GEOGRAPHIC EXPERIENCE The company's Alaska operation began in ‘1970 in Anchorage, was subse- quently extended to Fairbanks, Homer, and Valdez as projects demanded. To date, Dames & Moore has concluded more than 1000 Alaska-based projects involving virtually every scientific discipline represented by the firm's professional staff. Selected reference projects follow. Resource Associates of Alaska, an Alaska corporation since 1970, is a minerals exploration and development firm that has conducted numerous field recconnaissance programs in northwest Alaska and the Seward Peninsula as exemplified in the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION Project: Water Quality Data at Selected Active Placer Mines in Alaska Location: Interior and Western Alaska Date: 1976 Client: Calspan Corporation Owner: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Dames & Moore conducted a water-quality survey designed to document receiving stream quality below different types of placer mining operations, including cat and front-end loader, dredge, dragline, and hydraulic giant loaded sluice bexes. Mining operations with and without settling ponds were surveyed to determine the effectiveness of such ponds. Mines, ranging from 1 to 10-man operations, were visited in the Fairbanks, Circle, Livengood, Manley, and Nome mining districts. Additionally, effects of recreational mining activities were measured in the Fairbanks mining district. Recreational mining consisted of panning, rockers, small suction dredges, and a small shovel-loaded sluice box. Because the emphasis of the survey was related to the effectiveness of settling ponds, suspended and settleable solids as well as turbidity were measured. This emphasis was a manifestation of both federal and state regulatory agency requirements. General water quality characteristics were also measured, including dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, and temperature. DAMES 8 MOORE PROJECT LOCATION Project: Review of the Effectiveness of Natural Resource Protection During Petroleum Development on Lands in Alaska Date: In Progress Client: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contact: Kent Wohl, U.S.F.W.S. FATE Anchorage The: purpose of the study is to analyze resource protection procedures in the context of past, present, and future petroleum development activities within Alaska. Prior developments, as in the National Petroleum Reserve and Kenai Moose Range areas, are being examined. Administrative procedures, especially tm regard to interagency communications, are also being analyzed. Scenarios representing future developments are being formulated as an aid in determining ‘what. kinds of regulations will be most appropriate and effective. The ultimate product of the study will be a statement of recommended procedures, regula- tions, and stipulations that can be applied to future petroleum development + projects_and can be used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a guideline im carrying out their regulatory functions. Project: Location: Owner: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: RECENT COAL AND LIGNITE EXPERIENCE Open Pit Coal Mine Design Wyoming The Carter Mining Company Dames & Moore performed the mine design for the South Rawhide open pit coal mine near Gillette, Wyoming. The design study included and evaluation of the coal reserves present on the property, as well as planning for plant siting, production scheduling, equipment selection and scheduling, and a mining cost analysis. Comprehensive Coal Mine Planning Steamboat Springs, Colorado Energy Fuels Corporation Detailed mining plans were prepared for the Energy surface coal mines near Steamboat Springs, Colorado. This study included the review of exploration drill hole information, the determination of the Wadge, Lennox, and Fish Creek coal seams thickness and depth of overburden. In order to select an initial boxcut site for a new mining area for a fleet of three draglines ranging from 14 to 55-yard machines, Dames & Moore defined detailed mining cuts on a yearly basis for a Marion 7400 (14 cubic yard), a Bucyrus Erie 770 (21 cubic yard), and a Marion 8050 (55 cubic yard) and subsequently submitted these plans to the U.S. Geological Survey area mining super- visor for government approval. Other studies during this investigation also included overburden removal by the front-end loader and truck, and by ripper/scraper equip- ment systems at the Energy 2 and 3 Mines. Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Coal and Lignite Resource Availability and Transportation Availability Southern Mississippi South Mississippi Electric Power Association Dames & Moore has identified coal resources and transpor- tation economics for sufficient fuel to sustain 300 MW to 1,000 MW of planned additional capacity in Southern Mississippi. the relative economics of using eastern coal, western Dames & Moore will select a coal source and fuel transportation The purpose of the study will be to compare coal, or southeastern lignite. Essentially, system to minimize the costs of extraction, transpor- tation and environmental mitigation. Coal Property Evaluation Harlan, Kentucky First National Energy Corporation Comprehensive analysis of the company's property to develop an estimate of the quantity and quality of coal present. developed. Recommendations of suitable mining methods were Review and Assessment of Lignite Properties and Prepar- ation of Pre-Feasibility Mine Plans and Cost Estimates Texas Confidential Dames & Moore is currently undertaking a review of drill hole data, for several interpretations and mining plans The project geological lignite properties entails the critical assessment of data supplied by a third party, verification of reserves and mining plans, and the preparation of a series of preliminary mine plans Also included is in Texas. and cost estimates for each property. the identification of critical environmental factors for each area. Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: * Client: Brief Description: Assessment of Lignite Reserves and Preparation of Pre-Feasibility Mine Plans and Cost Estimates Texas Confidential Dames & Moore recently completed a reserve analyses and a pre-feasibility mine plan and cost analysis for a prop- erty planned to contain two large open pit lignite mines. The project entailed the preparation of maps and cross sections from drill hole logs, and the determination of detailed reserves from those maps. After the reserves were completed, the data was used to design the open pit mines, and to do a pre-feasibility cost analysis for each mine. Lignite Resource Evaluation and Mining Pre-Feasibility Study Texas Confidential Dames & Moore supervised an extensive rotary and core drilling program to determine the quantity and quality of lignite resources underlying an area of northeast Texas. The drilling data was utilized in the preparation of jisopach, overburden and stripping ratio maps. Resources were delineated for each seam present and a total re- source estimate was prepared for this multiseam deposit. A pre-feasibility mining study was subsequently under- taken to consider the mineability of the lignite with reference to the prevailing and projected market condi- tions; the costs of mining using various equipment configurations; the mineral economics of the project; and the socio-economic and environmental effects of mining activity in the area. Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Exploration Drilling and Evaluation of Lignite Property Texas Confidential Dames & Moore supervised exploratory rotary drilling to obtain data on the quantity of lignite thought to be After the drilling phase was complete, Dames & Moore geologists prepared lignite beneath a private ranch. correlation sections and diagrams, and from these, prepared reserve maps and estimates for the property. Review of Mine Plans Schedule and Reserve Estimates for Lignite Property Southeastern United States Confidential Dames & Moore conducted a critical review of the mining plans and scheduling of development for a lignite prop- erty in the southeastern United States. A review of the reserves estimation was also conducted to verify reported reserves. Lignite Resource Valuation Alabama Confidential Dames & Moore recently completed a study reviewing properties in existing drill hole data for several Alabama. Maps were produced showing the lignite deposits of the area and a dollar value per acre was .assigned for tax transfer purposes to those areas having lignite resource amenable to strip mining. Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Evaluation of Comparative Economics of Western Coal versus Texas Lignite Deposits Texas Confidential This recent study involved estimating costs of developing and transporting Texas lignite deposits and evaluating markets for the lignite vis-a-vis the competition of western sub-bituminous coals from the Mountain and Plains states. To accomplish the objective, it was necessary to develop estimates of mine development and operating costs, compile det ajg ed information on unit train rates and costs, and to evaluate current and projected demand for coal in Texas (taking into account conversion requirements and the impact of Clean Air Act regulations on use of coal versus other fuels for electric power generation and industrial use). Results of this study are confidential. Coal Property Evaluation Coalville Field, Utah Confidential Analysis of structural geology to locate areas suitable for large-scale mining. Dames & Moore also developed a preliminary mining plan and an evaluation of the mining and transportation costs, as well as a review of the competitive position of the field. We also performed an assessment of the coal quality. Audit of Coal Reserve Estimate, Mine Plan Hiawatha, Utah Sharon Steel Corporation Audit of previous coal reserve estimates and mine plan studies, for U.S. Fuels Hiawatha mine, to confirm the technical correctness of this work as contained in a Registration Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Project: Location: Client: Brief Description: Coal Supply, Transportation, and Utilization Study South Mississippi South Mississippi Electric Power Authority As part of a site selection study, SMEPA commissioned Dames & Moore to identify alternative sources of coal for a proposed power plant in south Mississippi. The object- ive of the study was to determine which coal supply yielded least total cost of power generation at alternate plant locations. Taking into account cost of the coal FOB; mine, transportation and handling (rail & barge), heat value, and sulfur and ash contents, costs of scrub- bing, and costs of power transmission from the plant to the local grid. Coal suppliers and transportation companies in the major western and eastern coal regions were surveyed for information on costs and service characteristics. Coal Supply and Transportation Study Florida Florida Power and Light Company FP&L commissioned Dames & Moore to assess the availabil- ity and costs of supplying low-sulfur eastern coal to various propsective stream generating power plant sites in Florida over the next 30 years. On the basis of reserve analysis and assessment of environmental and socioeconomic impacts, five multi-county coal supply areas were identified in Appalachia and in southern Illinois. A computational model of prototype mine was utilized to indicate costs of development and operation. Potential routes and modes of transport between each coal reserve area and candidate plant sites in Florida were studied as to cost and reliability of service for the Project: Location: Client: Brief Descriptions: volumes of coal projected. Freight tariffs and capital costs ere compiled for unit train, inland and ocean barge, and slurry pipeline over a variety of routes. Delivered costs of coal (in cents per million Btu) were calculated for each coal reserve area and route/mode combination for each plant siting alternative. Discount cash flow analysis was performed to determine present worths of future costs, including costs of capital recovery of FP&lL-owned coal properties and transport facilities. 2 The final objectives of the study were (1) to determine potential environmental and socioeconomic constraints on developing and transporting the identified supplies, and (2) to formulate recommendations options with respect to reserve locations and transportation routes and modes. The results of the study are proprietary. Analysis for Future Coal Markets Southern Utah Fluor Mining Metals Dames & Moore performed a study to determine the market for coal from a southern Utah coal property and the price attainable for this product in the western United States. Key Personnel Jay M. England, Vice President and Principal- in-Charge. B.S., civil engineering and B.A., business administration, Pennsylvania State Uni- versity. Graduate courses, engineering management, University of Alaska. Member, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Alaska Society of Pro- fessional Engineers (Anchorage Chapter President, 1977), Arctic Institute of North America, Alaska Ground Water Association, Municipality of Anchorage Geotechnical Commission. Registered professional engineer and land surveyor. Duane L. Miller, Associate Engineer. M.S., geological engineering, and B.S., civil engineering, University of California, Berkeley. Graduate study, University of Alaska. Member, ASCE, Alaska Geological Society, Alaska Ground Water Association, American Geophysical Union, Society of American Military Engineers, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. Registered professional engineer. HLA geophysicists conduct surveys to explore arctic subsurface conditions in t winter and summer. Righ Ground penetrating radar survey, North Slope. Belov Marine seismic survey, Beaufort Sea. HLA’s Anchorage office has provided profes- sional services in Alaska since 1969 on a wide variety of projects. The firm’s principal services are soil mechanics, permafrost and foundation engineering, soil dynamics and seismology, engineering and ground-water geology, geophysics, laboratory testing, construction quality control, and instrumentation. Our assignments have ranged from housing developments and schools in remote villages to complex industrial facilities throughout the state. Our clients include petroleum and other industrial companies, architects, engineers, con- tractors, institutions and government agencies. HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES ANCHORAGE OFFICE: 624 West International Airport Road e Anchorage, Alaska 99502 e 907/276-8102 « Telex: 09025149 of Alaska @ = Job Location The Anchorage laboratory is staffed and equipped to provide conventional classification and quality control tests, as well as secondary tests (triaxial compression, direct shear, vane shear, consolida- tion and permeability). The laboratory also has special low-temperature rooms and equipment to test frozen soils under controlled temperature, stress and strain conditions. Among the soil characteristics measured are strength, creep, thaw strains, and thermal conductivity. For remote sites, HLA provides drilling, soil samp- ling and geophysical equipment that can be trans- ported readily by helicopter or commercial aircraft. Geophysical methods are particularly suited to remote and offshore site investigations; HLA has pioneered in the use of seismic, electrical resistivity and ground penetrating radar surveys to explore permafrost. Far right: In Anchorage laboratory, frozen soils are tested for strength, top, and thermal conductivity, center. Drilling in remote areas is facilitated, bottom photo, by use of helicopter-transported drilling equipment. Some Clients and Projects Sagavanirktok River Bridge, Prudhoe Bay U.S. GOVERNMENT U.S. Courthouse and Federal Office Building, - Anchorage (General Services Administration, Main Post Office, Kodiak (Postal Service) Headquarters complex, Kenai National Moose Range, Soldotna (Fish & Wildlife) High School, Eielson Air Force Base Regional geotechnical investigation, Alaskan Beaufort Sea lease sale area (Geological Survey) STATE OF ALASKA Elementary and secondary schools, Fairbanks, Shishmaref, Kotlik, Kipnuk, Akiak, Northway, Kongiganak, Chuathbaluk, Kaltag, Dillingham, Yakutat, Pilot Station and other villages Richardson and Seward Highways, Bogard and Kenai Spur Roads Kake Airport Harbors in McGrath and Dog Bay MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Merrill Field Airport expansion Geotechnical hazards evaluation Parking garages, Sth Ave. and C Street, 4th Ave. and K Street Waste collection system, Girdwood ~ PETROLEUM INDUSTRY Soil thermal properties, long-term temperature monitoring of piles, Prudhoe Bay (Sohio) Design of gravel islands, Prudhoe Bay ~ (Exxon Company USA) Flow Station III, Prudhoe Bay (Atlantic Richfield Company) Waterflood sea water intake and treatment plant, Prudhoe Bay (Atlantic Richfield Company) Wildcat sites and HERC strips, Yantarni Bay (Chevron USA, Inc.) ALASKAN ARCHITECTS/CONSULTING ENGINEERS ’ Dock facilities, Unalaska, Sitka, Seward, Kodiak U.S. Coast Guard POL System, Kodiak Railroad dock expansion, Whittier Village housing, Quinhagak, Marshall, Sheldon Point, McGrath, Nenana, Pakotna Crossings for Robertson, Johnson, Tanana, Hammond and Koyukuk Rivers SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING Harding Lawson Associates Our services include site planning and feasibility studies, site reconnaissance, exploration, soil sampling and preparation of soil profiles and soil engineering analysis for design criteria for foundations and earthwork. Typical Projects Office Building and Jail, Nome Complete soils and foundation engineering for a two-story state building on the beach adjacent to the Nome sea wall. A driven, pre-stressed, concrete pile foun- dation was recommended. Our:services included inspection of pile driving. For the State Division of Buildings, Mr. Ed Philleo, Project Architect, Fairbanks, 456-5144. Second Dock Facility, Prudhoe Bay Analysis and design for a 5000-foot-long causeway embankment and sheet pile re- taining wall. Services included drilling and soil sampling both on and off- shore. For Atlantic-Richfield Company and The Ralph M. Parsons Company, Mr. George Tashkoff, Project Engineer, Pasadena, (213) 440-4306. Federal Office Building, Anchorage Complete soils and foundation engineering and continuing consultation for this 60-million-dollar federal complex occupying a three-block area. Services in- cluded drilling and sampling test borings up to 100 feet deep, conducting pump tests for dewatering analysis and the development of design criteria for the foundation system. For the General Services Administration, Mr. Bill Maikawa, Project Engineer, Auburn, (206) 833-6500. Village Alaska Schools Soils and foundation engineering for elementary and secondary schools in several rural villages including Shishmaref, Hooper Bay, Kipnuk, Akiak, Northway, Kaltag, Kongiganak, Chuathbaluk, Dillingham, Pilot Station and others. Most of these projects involved mobilization of portable drilling equipment and design of pile types and lengths for foundation support in permafrost soils. For various Alaska architects and the State Division of Buildings, Mr. John Steinman, Division of Design, 279-0418 and Mr. Jerry George, Division of Construction, 277-1667. Trans-Alaska Pipeline Continuing consultation and design review of soils engineering criteria for pipe- line vertical support piles, review of field design change procedures and review of specifications for pipe bedding and backfill, subdrainage, erosion, control, blasting, riprap, earthwork and cut and Fill slopes. For the Department of the Interior, Pipeline Office, GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS tarding Lawson Associates For site explorations, we utilize locally available drill rigs or backhoes, if possible, directed by our geologists. We also provide light-weight drilling, soil sampling and geophysical equipment that can be air transported readily by helicopter or commercial aircraft. Geophysical methods are particularly well- suited to remote site investigations and we have pioneered in the application of refraction seismic and electrical resistivity techniques in permafrost soils. Typical Projects Satellite Communications Antenna, Elmendorf A.F.B. Determination of in-situ shear and compression wave velocities and dynamic soil moduli utilizing up-hole and cross-hole seismic techniques. For DOWL Consulting Engineers, Mr. Mel Nichols, Project Engineer, Anchorage, 278-1551. Ship Creek Fish Hatchery, Anchorage Electrical resistivity profiling in the flood plain to evaluate the thickness of the unconfined acquifer and the best target areas for high yield water wells. For the State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game and Tryck, Nyman & Hayes, Mr. Frank Nyman, Project Engineer, Anchorage, 274-0543. Pilgrim Hot Springs, Seward Peninsula Evaluation of geothermal reservoir potential by electrical resistivity soundings and profiling to depths exceeding 3000 feet. For Stefano-Mesplay Associates, Con- sulting Engineers and Pilgrim Springs, Ltd., Mr. C.J. Phillips, President, Nome, 443-2560. Sagavaniroktok Pipe and Vehicular Bridges, Prudhoe Bay Delineation of the depth of the thaw bulb, permafrost table and saline zones be- neath the Sag River at the proposed bridge crossings by refraction seismic and electrical resistivity methods. For Atlantic-Richfield Company, Mr. Glenn Davis, Engineering Manager, Pasadena, (213) 440-3663. Monashka Creek Dam, Kodiak Profiling of bedrock and evaluation of borrow areas by refraction seismic methods. Exploration of bedrock along dam axis, abutments and spillway by coring and drill hole pump tests. For International Engineering Company, Mr. Pablo Chavez, Project Manager, San Francisco, (415) 397-4071. High School Water Well, Shishmaref Deep electrical resistivity soundings to determine the depth and thickness of water bearing sands and the depth to bedrock. For the State of Alaska, Division of Build- ings, Mr. George Porter, Chief of Construction, Juneau, 586-6411. HARDING-LAWSON ASSOCIATES ALASKAN PROJECT LOCATIONS Harding-Lawson Associates has provided geotechnical engineering services throughout Alaska in a range of different soil, geologic and climatic environments. Because of the geographic range we cover, much of our equipment is portable and can be easily mobilized from Anchorage to near or remote sites. Adak Akhiok Akiak Anchorage Attu Barrow Beaufort Sea Bethel Chiniak Chuathbaluk Circle Cobblestone Creek Cook Inlet Cordova Craig Dillingham Dutch Harbor Eagle River East Ivotuk Emmonak Fairbanks Fortuna Ledge Galena Girdwood Glenallen Gulf of Alaska Gulkana Haines Homer Hooper Bay Juneau Kachemak Kake Kalskag Kaltag Kandik Basin Kenai Ketchikan Kiana Kimball Pass Kipnuk Kodiak Kongiganak Kotlik Kotzebue Kuparuk River Kuspuk Lonely Manokotak Marshall Matanuska Valley McGrath Milne Point Mountain Village Naknek Nenana New Stuyahok Nightmute Nome Noorvik The following list presents sites of HLA Alaskan project experience: Northway Nuiqsut Palmer Pilgrim Springs Pilot Station Point Hope Prince William Sound Prudhoe Bay Quinhagak Russian Mission Selawik Seward Sheldon's Point Shishmaref Sitka Sleetmute Soldotna Takotna Talkeetna Togoyuk Tulusak Unalaska Wainwright Wasilla Whittier Willow Valdez by Yakutat Yantarni Bay INTRODUCTION a. WUistory of Nunam Kitlutsisti Nunam Kitlutsisti was formed by the Association of Village Council Presidents at a special cmvention in 1973. AVCP, the regiqmal nonprofit Yupik Eskimo corporation in the Yukon Kuskokwim delta region in Southwestern Alaska, formed Nunam Kitlutsisti to work specifically m the envirmmental concerns of the 56 villages in the regim. Since its formatim, Nunam Kitlutsisti has worked qm numerous issues concerning the use of renewable and nonrenewable resources in the Yukon Kuskokwim delta area. Nunam Kitlut- sisti continues to work closely with AVCP, and its member villages m these issues. The size of the Nunam Kitlutsisti staff has gradually increased ower the years as the environmental issues facing delta residents have become more numerous and canplicated. b. Organizational philosophy/goal/missim The central philosophy of Nunam Kitlutsisti, established by its Board of Directars (see sectim f below), is that the villagers in the AVCP : Yegion should effectively participate in any decisims made which affect the regions renewable and nonrenewable resources. Thus, the organization's goal is to provide infarmatim to the villages and their elected bodies about decisims being made about their resources so that they can become involved in that process. Among the ways that this public informatim campaign is accomplished are: weekly television and radio shavs; direct oo the employment of seven local village residents whose task is to visit all local villages at least five times a year with relevant informatim; organiza- tiqal and administrative support for the four Alaska Department of Fish and Game Advisory Carmmittee in the region; and organizing visits to the villages by representatives for State, wd Federal Agencies, and private individuals, and campanies who are making decisions about the land and its resources. c. Principle activity As stated previously, Nunam Kitlutsisti's prim:-area of involvement is with the use of renewable and nmrenewable resources in the delta regim. Mare specifically, this broad area of involvement can be broken into 6 main sub-categories. l. Fisheries. Nunam Kitlutsisti monitors federal and state fish regulatory and legislative policies affecting the delta so that villagers are able to make carments in this formulatim staye. We have also provided information to fishermen about inmproving fish quality; developing fishermen's arganizatims; working on problems created by the State's limited entry legislation, and helping local villagers become involved in the new fisheries develgping in their areas (e.g., herring). 2. Game. Nunam Kitlutsistimonitors federal and state game regulatory , and legislative policies, insuring that the villagers actively and effectivley participate in these processes. 3. Migratory Waterfowl. Nunam Kitlutsisti has been providing informa- tion to the villages and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service concerning tthe problem of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act's prohibition against. the taking of migratory waterfowl in the spring by Alaska Natives. 4. Marine Manmals. Nunam Kitlutsisti provides infarmaticm to the Eskimo Walrus Cammission, the U.S. Department of the Interior and ADF&G concern- ing the present federal Marine Manmals Protection Act's exemption for Alaska Natives fran the prohibition of hunting marine mamas. 5. Energy. Nunam Kitlutsisti is providing information to the villages on energy conservatim and alternative energy systems. 6. Land.» Nunam Kitlutsisti has monitored state and federal land regulations and statutes. Among the state issues about which Nunam Kitlutsisti has informed the villagers are the homestead provisims, the area's newly elected Coastal Resource area board; and the State's near shore oil and gas leasing schedule. Among the federal issues about which Nunam Kitlutsisti has kept the villages informed are the national interest lands legislation (d-2), the Marine Sanctuary Act, the Submerged Lands Act, Coastal Zone Management, and the Federal Outer Continental Shelf Oil and gas leasing schedule for the next five years. d. Qualification/type of organization. Nunam Kitlutsisti is a 501l(c) (3) tax exempt organization working primarily as an educational institution. In the unorganized borough in Western Alaska Nunam Kitlutsisti is a primary resource agency. It's village liaisjs allow Nunam Kitlutsisti to have intimate contact with the villagers and their concerns. Nunam Kitlutsisti's success has been recognized by Governor Hammond, who awarded us an Environmental merit award in 1978. e. Accomplishments/past evaluatims. Nunam Kitlutsisti's accanplishments are too numerous for an exhaustive listing. However, among the major accomplish- Tents of the organization are: i es. ws 1. State Subsistence law. Nunam Kitlutsisti provided the Alaska legislature with information resulting in the enactment of a law providing that subsistence use of fish and wildlife resources shall be the first priority use of those resources. This statute should help to insure the continuation of subsistence use of the resources. 2. Federal national interests lands legigfation (d-2). Nunam Kitlutsisti has informed the villagers of the legislative process in the U.S. e Congress which is considering legislatim to classify lands located in Alaska into federal parks, refuges, forests, wild and scenic rivers, and wilderness areas. After informing the villagers of their options, the villagers decided oan a course of action. Nunam Kitlutsisti then transmittted village concerns to the Congress, with the result that every pending bill on the subject now contains strong provisims protecting subsistence. Other provisions included in these bills which will benefit the villagers are sections approving Native Allotments and providing for habitat protection. 3. Migratory Birds. The federal government is a party to treaties which prohibit the harvest of migratory waterfowl in the springtime by Alaska Native. Nunam Kitlutsisti has been transmitting information to the federal government about the nutritional and cultural necessity of the harvest of migratory waterfowl to Yukon-Kuskokwim delta residents. The federal govern- ment is now moving toward an amendment of these treaties to allow for a legal spring hunt by Alaska Natives. 4. Development of Stonavik Cooperative. Pursuant to a request from the villagers in Chevak, Scanmon Bay, and Hooper Bay, Nunam Kitlutsisti provided technical information resulting in the formation of a cogperative in those villages. The purpose of the cooperative was to get residents of the three villages into the newly developed herring fishery located in the Cape Rananzof area. In the 1980 fishing season over 60 villagers were involved in the fishery; projections are that next season twice that many will became involved. 5. Coastal Zone Management. Nunam Kitlutsisti brought the attention of local villagers the impending outer continental shelf oil and gas explora- tion in the Bering Sea, as well as the state and federal legislation authoriz- ing the adoption of coastal zone management plans by locally elected coastal resource area boards. The ccastal zme management plans can designate the uses to which lands in coastal areas can be in respose to this information, the villages voted to set up a coastal resource area board and elected its members. This board had just begun the process of writing a plan for the Yukan-kuskokwim delta area. Hopefully this plan will be in effect prior to the occurence any substantial outer continental shelf oil and gas drilling activity in this region. 6. Herring. In the late fall of 1979 Nunam Kitlutsisti provided the villages with information concerning the winter off shore harvest by foreign fleets of herring which spawns along the coast of western Alaska in the spring. Western Alaskans depend upon this resource for both subsistence and comercial purposes. This information resulted in the villages deciding to pursue a lawsuit in federal court to stop the foreign off shore fishery. The suit was successful in the federal district court, and has been appealed to the ninth circuit. 7. Other issues. Nunam Kitlutsisti has, through weekly television and radio shows, attempted to keep villagers informed about other relevant topics, such as state fisheries and game regulatory proposals, state and federal land policies, and state and federal water policies. f. Board membership and their functions. Board members are selected from each of the Association of Village Council President's 10 administrative units. The Board of Directors meet at least four times a year, and over see Nunam Kitlutsisti's budgeting and personnel policies. The Board also directs the staff to work on certain issues when vacancies in the Board occur, the village governments in that particular administrative unit nominate replacements. The Nunam Kitlutsisti Board Members then select the new board member from among the nominess, and their decision is presented to AVCP for ratification. PRESENT BOARD MEMBERS are: . Administrative Units Office John Hanson Alakanuk 1 Vice President Raphael Jinmy Mt. Village 2 Billy Morgan Aniak 3 James Lott Tuluksak 4 oF Wassillic B. Evon Napakiak 5 Mathew Active Kasigluk 6 President Paul Kiunya Kipnuk 7 Jack Williams Mekoyak 8 Ulric Nayamen Chevak 9 Treasure Issac Hawk Eek 10 g. Staff Qualifications. Harold Sparck, director. Has been the director of Nunam Kitlutsisti since its formation in March of 1973. He holds a B.S. from George Washington University and a M.S. from Antioch College-West. For the past 7 years he has directed the program pursuant to the directives of the Board of Directors. He has concentrated on fisheries issues, and has worked to give technical assistance to fishermen wanting to form political and marketing organizations. Among the organizations he has worked closely with are the Bering Sea Fishermen's Association, the Alaska Native Foundation, Stonavik Cooperative, the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, the Alaska Board of Fisheries, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Alaska Fisheries Foundation, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Agricultural Association, and Fishermen's Association through- out the region. Kenneth Hanm, Fisheries Coordinator. Is an attorney who has lived in Bethel for four years. He has extensive experience with fisheries issues. He worked with Legal Services for two and a half years, spegializing in limited entry problems. For the past year and a half he has worked on fisheries issues for Nunam Kitlutsisti. He served as Interim Director of the Lower Yukon-Kuskokwim Agriculture Association for four months. He drafted the articles of incorporation “abd bylaws of the Bering Sea Fishermen's Association, the Stonavik Cooperative, and ‘Kokechik Corporation. He is familiar with loan and other financial aid prograns for fishermen. He has represented the region on Governor Hanmond's fish quality study group program, and has worked with the delta's fishermen to improve fish quality. He has also supervised CETA training programs in both salmon quality and herring harvest. Larry Chase, Assistant Fisheries Coordinater. Larry is a resident of Nunapitchuk, and a past student at Kuskokwim Community College's Land Resource Management Division. Larry has been active as a commercial and subsistence salmon fisherman on the Kuskokwim, and is involved in the Kuskokwim Fishermen's Coop. He was introduced this year into the newly formed commercial herring industry at Cape Romanzof and. Security Cove by Nunam Kitlutsisti. Harry Wilde Sr., Lower Yukon Liaison. Harry is director of the Lower Yukon Fishermen's Association, and has worked on fisheries issues for 7 years. He is a. commercial ‘and subsistence fishermen. He has represented this region before the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council and the Alaska Board of Fisheries. He.is a member of the Lower Yukon Fish and Game Advisory Committee. Mike Hunt, Yukon Delta Liaison. Mike has worked with the villages at the mouth of the Yukon on salmon quality and herring fishing. He has worked for Nunam Kitlutsisti since 1978 and is a member of the Lower Yukan Fish and Game Advisory cammittee. He has been a lifelag cammercial and subsistence fisherman. He has attended meetings of the North Pacific Fisheries Camissicm, and the Alaska Board of Fisheries representing the interests of the villages at the mouth of the Yukon. Henry K. Evon, Central Bering Sea Liaison. Henry is Kwigillingok's representative on the Central Bering Sea Fish and Game Advisory Committe, and has represented the interests of his area before the State Board of Fisheries. He is a commercial and subsistence fishermman. He has. traveled to Washington, D.C., to represent the fisheries interests of his area before the federal ‘government . eh Yako Tinker, Lower Kuskokwim Liaison. Yako has been involved with the management of the Kuskokwim Fishermen's Cooperative. He is a cammercial and subsistence fisherman. He has worked for one year with Nunam Kitlutsisti, working with the. villages surrounding Bethel on fisheries issues, especially on salmon quality. George Morgan Jr., Middle Kuskokwim Liaisqa: George is a cammercial and subsistence fisherman from Kalskag. He has represented his area on the Kuskokwim Native Association Board of Directors, and has instituted a fisheries quality program in the Middle Kuskokwim region since coming on Nunam Kitlutsisti's staff. Janet Shantz, Janet has worked for Nunam Kitlutsisti for the past year,and presently is in charge of our accounting. She will be taking an accounting course at Kuskokwim Camunity College in the fall. Owen Freeman, a CPA has worked with her on our books. Alic2 Criswell, accounts clerk. Alice has worked with Nunam Kitlutsisti for over one year, specializing in accounting procedures. Connie James, Secretary. Connie has worked with Nunam Kitlutsisti for the past two months. h. Past funding sources. 1. Rural Cap. Rural Cap has sponsered the majority of organizational work on developing rural day fisheries in Western Alaska. Their support and travel funding has allowed Nunam Kitlutsisti staff members to attend meetings with federal and state agencies and the villagers on fisheries issues. 2. State of Alaska CETA Program. Has paid expenses for herring training programs in coastal villages. 3. Yupiktak Bista Manpower. Has contributed funding allowing Nunam Kitlutsisti to carry out salmon quality programs in the delta area. HS 4. Campaign for Human Development. Has contributed money for infarma- a 4 ‘kon program fran Nunam Kitlutsisti to the villages on fisheries programs. 5. State of Alaska. Has contributed money to Nunam Kitlutsisti for an information program to the villages, centering on fisheries issues, especially herring. 6. <fice of the Governor, Bottanfish Coordinators Office. For Gevelopment of regional options for subsistence/camercial utilization of herring. 7. VISTA. Has funded five locally recruited volunteers fram the villages, who help Nunam Kitlutsisti with its information and education program. i. Fiscal Tract Record. Nunam Kitlutsisti has been audited on two ocassions, and successfully passed both audits. In addition, all Nunam Kitlutsisti contracts to date have been cost reimbursable for services rendered. Under this system billings have to accurately be developed for payment, and this has been successfully accanplished. The accounting office's functions have increas- ed as Nunam Kitlutsisti's budget has grown. Recently a separate office was set aside for accounting. Janet Shantz is in charge of these functions and Alice Criswell works with her. Owen Freeman, a Certified Public Accountant in Bethel, has worked with Nunam Kitlutsisti as a special cmsultant. Joli Morgan and John Schuler of the Kuskokwim Community College's Business Management Program act as advisors. j. Affiliation. Nunam Kitlutsisti and its staff are members of the following organizations: 1. The Association of Village Council Presidents 2. Alaska Native Foundation Fisheries Project 3. Alaska Federation of Natives Task Force 4. Governor's Whitefish/Quality Program Advisory Board 5. North Pacific Fisheries Management Council Advisory Panel 6. Alaska Fisheries Development Foundation 4 7. Lower Yukon/Kuskokwim Aquaculture Association 8. Rural Alaska Resources Association 9. Bering Sea Fishermen's Association k. Authority/Endorsements: AVCP has, in convention, delegated to Nunam Kitlutsiscti responsiblity for the following: a. develaqment of fisheries policies r b. develqument of subsistence policies c. development of d-2 steering canmittee d. development of game policies e. as staff of the d-2 steering committee f£. development of energy policy with AVCP Housing Authority g. development of coastal zone management plan as staff to the Yukon- Kuskokwim Coastal Resource Area Board h. as staff of the Clarence Rhodes Advisory Board i. to assist AVCP Realty and the Calista Regional Corroration on Land issues. All proposed policy statements are presented to AVCP through the AVCP Executive Committee. 1. Consistency of our priorities. In the early years of Nunam Kitlutsisti its emphasis, pursuant to the directives of the Board, were to advocate the AVCP region's interests to the federal and state governments and agencies. Now, thanks in part to those early efforts, federal and state agencies and governments are paying attention at an early time to village concerns. Consequently, the Board of Nunam Kitlutsisti has now changed the emphasis of the program into that of service delivery, especially in the areas of fisheries and coastal zone management. 2. Workman's Compensation. Nunam Kitlutsisti obtains workman's compensation through Rural Cap. 3, Nunam Kitlutsisti certifies that it will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, and that they will follow AVCP Eyployment and Train- ing and KINAP's policies and regulations. 4. Nunam Kitlutsisti has had its 503 C non-profit form approved by IRS. see attachment. BUDGET NARRATIVE PERSONNEL. . : : ¥ . : . : l. Directives for supervision of over-all project, coordinating, informa- tion production of radio and TV shows; giving technical assistance 2. obtained fran 8 years of wark in developmental fisheries in Western Alaska and the Bering Sea; praducticn of audio-visual ' programs on salmm quality and abuse, herring quality, and boat building for day~fisheries. Fisheries Coordinator charged with overall direction of instruct- ~ iqal program in fisheries; develqoment of materials, obtaining ’ technical information, production of packages of information on quality and gear for village distribution; supervising training program scheduling, assembly of materials for liaison training in Bethel; preparing village travel scheduling, ionitoring and tech- nically supporting liaison village visits; scheduling special visits to regional fishermen and fish and game advisory conmittee meeti- ings; and assisting regional fishermen organizations to develop similar programs for their local fisheries in the future. Assistant Fisheries Coordinator responsible for translation of all materials produced for media programing, and audio-visual programs for the villages into Yupik Eskimo; supervising and editing all materials produced for continuity and canprehension at the village level of understanding; development of transfer of written material into Yupik orthographies where appropriate; responsible for coar- dinating Bethel office response in Yupik to participants and village governments. Secretary performing gerneral office duties as assigned by Fisheries Ccordinatar, including answering and logging of phone calls, typing, filing, inventory of supplies. Accounts clerk:maintenance of ledgers Yor this program, posting of . all accounts payable, check writing, posting of all accaunts payable, personnel and corporation taxes, maintenance of bank records, and other duties as assigned by Fisheries Coordinator. 8. 10. Lower Kuskokwim Liaison servicing clients in Kuskokwim River villages fran Eek to Tuluksak; to visit each village at least four times during project year with program materials, and for special presentations to fish and game advisory cammittees and regional fishermen's meetings; to be Yupik speaking, and residents of sub- regimm. Middle Kuskokwim Liaison responsible for villages of Lower Kalskag to Lime Village; to visit each village at least four times during project year with program materials, and for special presentations to fish and game advisory conmittess and regional ‘fishermen's meetings; to be Yupik speaking and a resident of the sub-region. Central Bering Sea Liaison servicing clients in villages fran Platinum to Newtok; to visit each village at least four times during project year with program materials, and for special present- ations to fish and game advisory committee and regional fishermen's meetings; to be Yupik speaking, and resident of sub-reyion. Yukon Delta Liaison responsible for villages in the Yukon River Delta, Kotlik, Alakanuk, Emmonak, and Sheldon's Point due to distance and poor telephone/radio cammunicatimms; to visit each village at least four times during project year with program materials; and for special presentations to fish and game advisory camittees and regional fishermen's organization meetings; to be Yupik speaking and a resident of the sub-regim. Middle Yukon Liaison servicing clients fran Mountain Village to Russian Mission; to visit each village at least four times during project year with program materials, qd to attend fish and game advisory committee and local fishermen's meetings; to be Yupik speaking and resident of the regian. JACOBS ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS/CONSULTANTS a] CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE SERVICES 500 SANSOME ST., SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (415) 434-1822 TELEX NUMBER: 278484 JASOC CABLE ADDRESS: DONJAY © Company Profile Jacobs Associates is a firm of consulting engineers whose purpose is to provide those technical services which are neces- sary for the performance of construction. The Company, a California corporation, was founded in 1954 in San Francisco where its headquarters office is located at 500 Sansome Street. It is believed that clients’ needs can best be served by continuous recruitment of capable engineers experienced in the construction industry. As a result of this long standing policy, our key engineers are all job-trained construction specialists. The original aim of the Company was to provide consulting services to general contractors. That scope has since been expanded until clients now include owners and owner-agencies in all parts of the world. Construction engineering projects in which the firm has engaged include tunnels, shafts and under- ground chambers; dams; hydroelectric plants; locks; marine structures; buildings; bridges; highways; railroads and canals. The design of mine plants, materials handling facilities and certain types of industrial projects are included in our experience and capability. Such works can be undertaken either as design assignments or as turnkey jobs, performed solely or in partner- ship with other firms. Representative Clients The following names have been selected as typical from among the hundreds of clients served since the firm’s inception: Gordon H. Ball Inc. R. W. Beck & Associates Bechtel Corporation Boise Cascade Corporation Brown and Caldwell State of California, Dept. of Water Resources Central Eletrica de Furnas S.A. John Connell & Associates Consolidated Zinc Proprietary Limited Continental Heller Corporation Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District Dames & Moore De Leuw, Cather & Company Dillingham Corporation L. E. Dixon Company Donovan Construction Company Empresa Nacional de Electricidad (ENDESA) Ente Nazionale per I’Energia Elettrica Fibreboard Corporation Fletcher Construction Co. Foster-Miller Associates, Inc. The Foundation Company of Canada Limited Fruin-Colnon .Gardner-Denver Company _ Golden Gate Bridge District Granduc Mines Limited Granite Construction Company Green Construction Company Greenfield Construction Co. Grove, Shepherd, Wilson & Kruge, Inc. S. J. Groves & Sons, Inc. Harding, Miller, Lawson & Associates Harza Engineering Co. Harrison Bradford & Associates Limited Harrison Western Corporation City and County of Honolulu S. A. Healy Co. Hensel Phelps Construction Company The Herrick Corporation Dept. of Public Works, Hong Kong Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff Hydrotechnic Corporation Interconexion Electrica S.A. (ISA) Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE) ImpregiloS.p.A. Ingersoll-Rand Company . International Bank for Reconstruction and Development INGETEC Ltda. Al Johnson Construction Co. Kajima Corporation : Kaiser Engineers Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. Lawrence Radiation Laboratory Leeds Hill and Jewett, Inc. Lone Star Industries, Inc. Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power Maryland Transportation Authority Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works Melbourne Underground Rail Loop Authority Metropolitan Engineers Morrison-Knudsen Company Inc. The City of New York : Northwest Construction Co. Homer J. Olsen, Inc. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Perini Corporation : Placer County Water Agency Pomeroy Corporation Raymond International Inc. Ruth, Going & Curtis, Inc. City of Seattle Shaft Sinkers (Proprietary) Limited J. F Shea Co., Inc. City and County of San Francisco Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric Authority Southern Peru Copper Corporation Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Swinerton & Walberg Co. Taisei Corporation Thiess Bros. Pty. Limited Giuseppe Torno & C.S.p.A. Tudor Engineering Company Uniconsult, Inc. Utah International Inc. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. Dept. of Transportation Walsh Construction Company State of Washington Western Contracting Corporation George Wimpey & Company Limited Wismer & Becker Contracting Engineers Woodward-Clyde Consultants Professional Achievements Construction plays no geographic favorites. Since the firm started in business, a substantial part of its efforts has been directed towards projects in remote corners of the world. Only about half of its assignments are for jobs within the United States. The other half includes projects in South and Central America, Canada, several nations in Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, India, Pakistan, Middle East and Europe. Typical U.S. jobs include: Design of production plants for large concrete aggregate producers in Central California and in Southern California, project aggregate plants for Bullards Bar Dam, Angeles Tunnel, Lower Granite Dam and Power House. Consulting services to Municipalities of San Francisco, Honolulu, Seattle, Los Angeles, New York, and Baltimore relative to construction problems. Completion of pre-bid cost estimates for American contractors on several hundred public works contracts. Design of tunnel and underground test chambers for the 10-GEV Synchrotron for Cornell University. Excavation support design for approximately half the open-cut station excavations for both BARTD in the Bay Area and WMATA in Washington, D.C. Consulting services to Federal and State agencies in connection with such projects as Oroville Dam, Flathead Tunnel, Tombigbee Waterway, and Panama Canal. Design of shaft headframes and hoisting plant for contractors on New York Water Tunnel No. 3 and on Newhall Tunnel in California. Invention and development of Jacobs Sliding Floor, a movable railroad trackway for high speed rock tunnel construction. Known to some as the “Magic Carpet; it has gained world wide acceptance. Engineering analyses of numerous contract disputes for contractors and owners. Detailed design of a 42-inch wide, 2-mile long belt con- veyor system for handling 9 million cubic yards of earth fill material used in construction of Trinity Dam in Northern California. Perfection of several computer programs for cost esti- mating and project cost control. Professional Achievements (continued) Typical overseas jobs include: Melbourne, Australia, subway system, the design and construction management for which is being performed by a consortium including Jacobs Associates in joint venture with Australian, British and Canadian partners. Construction advisory services and supervision on two major hydroelectric tunnel projects for the government owned power company in Costa Rica. Consultant on contractual problems to major contractor in South Africa, a continuing contract of several years standing. Independent cost estimating of major public works in Iran. , Pre-bid estimating, followed by consultations, during construction of large rock fill dam in Japan. Client was a major Japanese contractor. Estimating and advisory services during construction of Melbourne, Australia, sewage collection system. Detailed design of world record gravel processing plant for Mangla Dam in Pakistan. Cost estimates for construction of large projects in many countries including Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, Colombia, Australia, New Zealand, Ghana, Algeria, Gabon, Ivory Coast, and South Africa. Construction Advisory Services As consultants to owners, Jacobs Associates performs construction management services from inception until completion of a project. These services include schedul- ing by application of modern computer techniques, negotiation of contracts, change orders, cost control, planning and reporting of cash flow, and surveillance of work in progress. Estimating and settlement of disputes are discussed elsewhere. Construction management services are provided in two stages: first, those performed during the design period in order to alleviate future construction problems and second, those services performed during the actual construction to assure the owner that his work will be completed on time and within his budget. To general contractors we offer technical assistance with all those engineering chores required during the performance of construction. These include estimating, design of special plant, excavation bracing, shoring and underpinning and settlement of disputes. We claim credit for introduction of the word “construct- ability” when defining the problems, time requirements and cost of the actual construction project. Feasibility cannot be established until determination of construct- ability, the measurement 2f which is crucial to execution of any engineering works. Because Jacobs Associates provides specialized knowledge of construction field methods and operating costs, the firm can offer excep- tional advantages in assessing constructability for owners, public agencies and other consulting engineers respon- sible for feasibility recommendations. Contractor’s Plant and Facilities | Today’s typical large construction project requires a carefully chosen fleet of specialized production plant and ~ equipment. The planning of such a complex is best done by experienced construction engineers with a knowledge of operations and a familiarity with the machines which perform those operations. Our firm has been engaged in construction plant design for more than two decades, having performed many varied assignments ranging from the design of individual tunnel drill jumbos to aggregate processing plants of world-record size. Tunneling and mining equipment are among the special- ties of the firm. Many new ideas in underground con- struction methods and equipment have originated in Jacobs Associates’ offices. A number of such innovations have become standard within the industry. Drill carriages, muck cars, shaft headframes, ventilation and dewatering plants are typical accomplishments of our design depart- ment. Detailing of concrete formwork is another field in which we assist contractors. Forms are designed for either metal or wood fabrication. The most profitable results are obtained from formwork for complex or repetitive structures. The firm has designed many types of cofferdams and has made river diversion studies leading to selection of stream handling methods. Experience in this field is available to clients who have problems involving unwater- ing of working areas. is SE Contractual Disputes A contractual disagreement in construction has been traditionally identified as a “claim? a word which creates an aura of antagonism because it suggests litigation. To dispel this effect, we prefer to use the word “dispute” Disputes are disruptive but due to the characteristic positions of contracting parties they are bound to arise occasionally in performance of construction. When they do arise they should be resolved promptly and justly, lest they develop into an adversary situation. We assist in resolution of disputes by applying objective technical analysis and understanding of construction processes. We analyze the contract documents, study the physical conditions and make a scientific determina- tion of cost of inequities. This is done by using methods which have legal precedence and acceptance, while applying modern management techniques such as com- puterized scheduling and estimating. A comprehensive report is prepared for the client. When litigation occurs, Jacobs Associates works with the legal counsel and, when required, provides court displays and expert testimony. During more than twenty years, contractors, owners, governmental agencies and attorneys have been assisted in the settlement of numerous and varied disputes involv- ing many types of construction projects. Estimating Prediction of cost of construction was a service which Jacobs Associates originally performed exclusively for contractors in the form of pre-bid estimates. Later we extended our estimating clientele to include owners, other consulting engineers and financing organizations. Making dependable estimates comes naturally to our contractor-trained staff. Computation of the cost of alarge project involves more than extending and totaling an assortment of individual rates chosen arbitrarily. Each job is literally built on paper, using modern modeling tech- niques. Quantities are analyzed, construction plant and equipment planned and each construction operation detailed as to crews, rate of production, materials and subcontracts. Jacobs Associates pioneered in the application of the electronic computer to the mechanical arithmetic proc- esses of construction estimating. Our first program for using computers in estimating was developed in 1963. We discovered that the utilization of comparatively inex- pensive machine time released experienced engineers from clerical tasks to the more productive occupations of planning and analyzing. The client benefits from the team efforts of construction engineers who have specialized experience. During the preparation of an estimate, staff meetings are held at intervals for the purpose of obtaining the ideas of others who have had pertinent experience. Construction cost estimates have been made for several billion dollars worth of construction work during the past two decades. Among projects for which con- tractor’s pre-bid estimates have been made are: w Numerous individual subway construction contracts for BART system in California and WMATA in Washington, D.C. m Akosombo Dam, Ghana m Pacheco Tunnel, California m@ Noxon Rapids Power House mu Granite Reef Aqueduct and Canal m Bacon Tunnel w Antioch Bridge, California m Ice Harbor Power House w Bonneville Railroad Tunnel Jobs which have been estimated for owners, other consultants or financial institutions include: w Oroville Dam m@ New York City Water Tunnel No. 3 @ Several portions of BART project uw Bandama River Project @ Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway m Chahbahar Naval Base, Iran w Southeastern Sewer Tunnels, Melbourne, Australia w San Francisco Ferry Terminal mw San Francisco Sewage Facilities JACORS: ASSOCIATES: CONSTRUCTION AUGIBEERS GRANITE SEBP CAEAL MARCH. 76." ITsa 181 Comc In BRIDGE DECKS 2100 cy orn 3 PLACE CORCRETB 2100. cy 15 SHIP? 140 cY PER SHIFT Qtr SRS / SHIFT 2OT ABS BATS TOTAL UNIT Cost 1 LABOR FOREMAN a 120 13.080. 1570 a LABORER 8 a60 11.2980. saa 1 CARPBITER 8 120 18.260 m1 1 CONCRETE PUMP OPER 8 120 15.180 1822 1 PIMISHING HACHINE OPER 6 30 15.180 1366 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR 930 11883 5.659 AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY 883 sascr 1 CONCRETE PUSP-8008 TRE 8 120 22.830 27490 3 nO DSCK PINISH NACHIES 2500 7500 . TOTAL EQUIPMENT 10200 4.876 Design of Underground Structures Jacobs Associates has learned that field experience in subterranean construction is a valuable asset to a designer of tunnels, shafts and underground chambers. A more practical and economic design results from a knowledge of construction methods and costs. Design of under- ground structures is performed either solely or in joint venture with other consultants. Jobs which have been designed include a ring-shaped 10-GEV Synchroton tunnel beneath the campus of Cornell University, a water tunnel for Contra Costa County in California, hydro- electric power tunnels in Costa Rica and, in joint venture, the Melbourne Underground Rail Loop, Australia. Our principals have acted as consultants to other engi- neers or to owner-agencies on design of Oroville Under- ground Power Plant, California; Flathead Railroad Tunnel, Montana; Sewer Tunnels, San Francisco; Berkeley Hills Tunnels; BART; and Crystal Springs Tunnel, California. Onsubway construction projects, bothin San Francisco and in Washington, D.C., Jacobs Associates has per- formed redesign of tunnels as a value engineering service for the general contractor. In each case, sections of subway had been specified to be constructed in open cut, but studies indicated that the work could be more economically constructed by tunneling. Changes were negotiated which resulted in substantial savings, split between owner and contractor. Research Because Jacobs Associates has an engineering staff with extensive practical experience in contruction, we are ina Par SUPPORT REQUIREMENT CHART _ unique position to conduct research within that industry. -—— The history of construction is a story of constant change; ol * St an everlasting search for new tools, techniques, meth- z pte ae ods and materials needed by an expanding technology. Saraog a A company that merely tries to keep pace with change, 2 8 eat instead of helping to bring it about, may be left far behind. aoe 3 a Recently completed research studies have included sats such diversified subjects as evaluation of cut-and-cover 2° [20 (Ria te oat Spacing techniques, fong-hole horizontal drilling, tunnel support 20 [2 prediction, construction equipment operation and main- ee tenance, disaster-created debris removal, excavation of aat . 4 — L 4 . large underground chambers, methane drainage for coal fi8 SPACING (FL) mines and hydraulic muck handling in tunnels. Those PL studies were variously sponsored by governmental agen- 20 DIAMETER TUNNEL cies, private industry and other engineering firms. Research assignments, although usually performed in the interest of a particular client, add to the store of tech- nical knowledge available to the construction industry. ORIZONTAL ND VERTICAL TEERING Russ: Noté: Muck CanveyoR OmITTEeD FoR CLARITY GRIPPERS FRAME MOVABLE TUNNEL SUPPORT SYSTEM PROPELLING ROCK UNNEL CUTTER HEAD PAT'D. BY J.D, JACOBS Retained Excavations Problems deriving from subsurface construction in open cut fall into several classifications which are frequently concurrent and interrelated. Bracing: Especially in urban areas, deep excavations require dependable and economical structural bracing systems to prevent ground subsidence and damage to adjoining structures. Such supports may be soldier piling, tiebacks, slurry trenching, or other. Whatever the method, Jacobs Associates has had wide experience with design of such systems, including subway construction in San Francisco, Washington, D.C., New York City and Mel- bourne. In addition to open cut excavations, we plan supports for tunnels and underground chambers. Serv- ices include design, supervision of installation and trouble-shooting. Dewatering: Control of ground water which tends to flow into deep excavations is a common problem for con- struction engineers. Jacobs Associates solves water problems by use of well pointing, deep wells or grouting. Cofferdams: Basically for the exclusion of water from an area during construction, cofferdams may be earth-fill, braced structures, or a combination. Our engineers have designed cofferdams of many types for use in the con- struction of dams, waterways, float-in-place tunnels, building foundations and subway stations. Representative jobs include Mobile Vehicular Tunnel, Antioch Bridge, sub- way stations in San Francisco and Washington, D.C., and Snowy Mountain dams in Australia. at Shoring and Underpinning Companion activities to excavation retainment, shoring and underpinning problems require application of founda- . tion design principles and a knowledge of construction techniques. Shoring systems, either above ground level or below, are used to prop structures, support concrete formwork or erect steelwork. Typical shoring jobs designed by Jacobs Associates include: supports for steel girders while erecting Sacramento Viaduct and Franklin Falls Bridge in the State of Washington; temporary structural bracing to maintain the integrity of the facade of the California State Capitol building during restoration; formwork sup- ports for several California Highway bridges including Richardsons Bay Bridge, Army Street Interchange and China Basin Viaduct in San Francisco and Eugene A. Doran Bridge in San Mateo. Underpinning is the process of transferring the support of buildings or other.structures from their original founda- tions to a new support system at a lower elevation to prevent destructive settlements due to adjacent new construction. Of all construction operations, it is one of the most intricate and demands precision and experi- ence. Structures for which we have designed underpinning include: Fine Arts Building, Army-Navy Club and Civil Court Building in Washington, D.C.; A.N.Z. Bank, Melbourne, Australia; Telephone Buildings in San Francisco and Bakersfield, California; numerous buildings and vault structures along the route of BART subway system, Bay Area, California. Pa Wi Al Fa <—/\ K\\ 4) VU wi KY TN