HomeMy WebLinkAboutTogiak Reconnaissance Study of Energy Requirements & Alternatives 1981RECONNAISSANCE STUDY
OF
ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND ALTERNATIVES
FOR
TOGIAK
Report Summary
April, 1981
=F om, oe
Northern Technical Services
and
Van Gulik and Associates
Anchorage, Alaska
ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY
RECONNAISSANCE STUDY
OF
ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND ALTERNATIVES
FOR
TOGIAK
Report Summary
April, 1981
by
Northern Technical Services
and
Van Gulik and Associates
Anchorage,Alaska
ERRATUM
In the Introduction to this summary report, the second para-
graph, first item on the first page should read as follows:
. It was necessary to assume that the cost
of diesel fuel would increase at a rate of
3.5% per year above the inflation rate.
Introduction
As you read this report, you will see that the results generally
favor energy conservation (including the use of waste heat from
diesel generators) with existing systems, as opposed to conver-
sion to renewable energy alternatives. These results do not
mean that renewable energy sources cannot be used in your com-
munity, but rather that, under the conditions and assumptions
used in the study, the alternatives appear to be at least as
expensive as diesel generation as well as somewhat higher in
risk. The abovementioned conclusions are actually best esti-
Mates based on reconnaissance work in your area. This work was
essential to predict the cost using other sources of energy.
The conclusions are based on past experience, present costs (of
fuel, materials and labor) and estimates of what might reason-
ably be expected to occur in future years.
Some of the assumptions which had to be made in order to perform
the economic analysis of the different alternatives include the
following:
* It was necessary to assume that the cost of diesel fuel
would increase at a rate of 3.5% per year.
* It was necessary to assume that the growth of the com-
munity's population would increase at roughly the same
rate that it has in past years and that the increase in
community energy consumption would follow that rate of
growth.
* It was necessary to assume that the costs associated
with maintenance and operation ot an alternative energy
conversion system would be an integral part of the annual
cost.
It was necessary to base cost estimates on present
(state-of-the-art) technology since it is virtually
impossible to predict future technical advances in sys-
tems for the conversion ot alternative energy resources
into useful electricity.
It was necessary to assume that most people would pre-
fer continuously available electricity and that they
would probably not be ready to accept the inconvenience
of intermittant power (for instance, doing without elec-
tricity when there was too little wind for their wind
generator to produce electricity.)
It was necessary to assume that most people would
prefer that a central "utility" provide them with elec-
tricity rather than installing and operating their own
system.
If any of the above assumptions prove to be inaccurate or if
their validity changes -- and this could easily happen in future
years as the costs of the existing systems continue to increase
-- alternatives‘which presently do not appear to be economically
or technically feasible may become real-options. Some examples
of changes which could result in more favorable economics for
the use of energy alternatives include the following:
Fuel prices in the community could increase at faster
rate than that assumed in this investigation.
People in the community might decide to maintain and
operate alternative energy conversion systems themselves,
perhaps even trading their services within the community
for subsistance commodities rather than cash.
New inventions or improvements on present technology
might make the cost of using an alternative energy source
much less expensive than is presently indicated.
What this report means, then, is that
* Energy conservation is certain to lead to some savings
of energy and money. Energy conservation measures will
continue to minimize costs in future years, no matter
what sources ot heat and electric power are in use.
* There are some alternatives (presented in the summary,
next section) which appear to be worthy of further
investigation at this time.
* It will be necessary to continue to look for ways to
make the use of other alternative energy sources
practical.
It is important that you, the people who live in the community,
and others with an interest in the community and the region
(including government leaders and planners), read this report
with the previous points in mind. You are most familiar with
your region and can, with appropriate technical and financial
support, make the best decisions for your energy future. The
authors of this report and the Alaska Power Authority hope that
you will take the time to comment on the information presented
here and point out any alternative ideas. In this way, we can
be assured that tuture planning tor energy projects will lead to
the best possible options tor your community.
It should be noted that the information presented here is
extracted from a much more detailed report "Reconnaissance Study
of Energy Requirements and Alternatives for Togiak, Goodnews
Bay, Scammon Bay and Grayling" and that additional detailed
information is available.
“The Community of Togiak
Togiak is a predominantly native Alaskan community of about 474
people located at the confluence of the Togiak River and Togiak
Bay within the Bristol Bay Region of the state. The town is
approximately 70 miles west of Dillingham and 130 miles south-
east of Bethel. Year round access to Togiak is provided by air
service out of Dillingham 6 days each week. There is presently
a 2,600 foot gravel airstrip, but a longer airstrip will be
constructed within the next two years. The new airstrip will
tacilitate shipping ot tish trom local processors and will
allow delivery of construction materials and other goods
throughout the year. This compares favorably with the current
system of infrequent barge deliveries. Togiak is serviced by
the Northstar III and by Soreneson Lighterage out of Dillingham.
Land transportation to Togiak is via snow machine during the
winter months. Pickup trucks, automobiles, motorcycles and
three-wheelers provide local transportation.
Togiak has a strong fishing enonomy. Most local employment
is seasonal in consisting of local fish processors and commer-
cial fishing. Additionally, there is a small local tull-time
employment with the state operated school, the city, and the
co-op store. There are several National Guard reservists in
Togiak, as well. Cottage industry consists ot basketry, and the
crafting of dolls, jewelery and fur products. Subsistence
hunting and fishing are important to the non-cash economy in
Togiak. The annual household income from all sources in 1977
was $9,395. More recent figures are expected to reflect the
continued development of the fishing industry in the region. A
household in Togiak averages 3.9 members.
Togiak has experienced a relatively rapid and consistent rate of
population growth since 1940; it is anticipated that the popula-
tion will continue to grow at a similar rate in future years
Energy Balance
For each village studied during this reconnaissance eftort, data
was gathered on the amount ‘and form of energy used in the vil-
lage, and a site reconnaissance was made to determine how the
energy was used. Based on the reconnaissasnce data, an energy
balance was prepared using proven calculation procedures to
determine losses in the conversion ot the incoming energy forms
such as oil to electrical power or to usable heat energy.
!
Space heating data was obtained relative to heating degree days
from several sources, and specific heating degree days data was
determined. The village of Togiak generally. experiences a
heating degree day load of 11,600 during the winter season.
Togiak Energy Use
The energy input and end use for Togiak, the largest community
investigated, is shown in Table 1. The data presented in this
table are based on 1979 energy consumption levels which is the
last year.for which complete data was available for this study.
The major oil consumers in the village are the Alaska Village
Electric Co-op, the residential and commerical buildings, the
state school (including both grammar school and high school
levels), and the transportation sector. The large use of gaso-
line and diesel for transportation is credited to the fact that
fishing is an important commercial activity in the village.
Local commercial fishing supports Togiak Fisheries across the
bay and Kachemak Seafoods in Togiak.
Propane and Blazo are used in the village for cooking. The
Kachemak Seafoods facility provides its own power generation and
oil heat. The only services it obtains from the community are
water and sewage. There is a new facility under construction in
Togiak, Togiak Eskimo Seafoods, which will be a large consumer
of oil, as it is anticipated that they will generate all of
their own electrical power for the 3-4 summer months that they
are in operation. No data on this facility was incorporated in
the current energy balance.
ENERGY INPUT AND END USE FOR TOGIAK
Number in parentheses () are (106 Btu)
ENERGY
FORM DIESEL/ GASOLINE/
END #1 OIL AVGAS PROPANE ELECTRICITY
USE Gallons Gallons Pounds Kilowatt Hours
Alaska Village 71,0001 55,3002
Electric Cooperative (9585.0) (188.7) —
Residential and 130,000 10,000 271,0004
Small Commercial (17.550) (216.7)3 (924.9)
+ (Heat/Domestic) |
Municipal and other 6,000 100,0004
public (810.0) (341.3)
(non-transportation)
Military 2,300 9004
(non-transportation) (310) | (3.1)
Transportation 10,000 117,800
(1350.0) (14.725) ——— 4 eI SES SeTEARER ENS NSIOIEERNDOIOE
State School 35,000 . 4,000 231,5004
(non-transportation) (4725.0) (86.6) (790.1) |_ _(non=transp —— mel
Kachemak Sea Foods 15,4005 Self Generated
(non-transportation) (2079.0) 126,300
| | | (431.0) |
NOTES:
l Gross generation from 71,000 gallons fuel oil was 658,700 Kwh tor a conversion
efficiency of 23.4%
2 Power consumed by the utility for station service (lights,
and system distribution losses Oe Ww Propane used for cooking only
Net utility electric sales in 1979 were 602,500 Kwh.
Kachemak estimates 1,500 gallons used for space heating and hot water, 13,900
gallons used for power generation
TABLE 1
fuel pumping, etc.)
Togiak appears to have a very high energy consumption per
household, even higher than that of colder regions of western
Alaska. The final input data for this village is considered to
be unreliable in that consistent fuel consumption records are
virtually unobtainable.
Oil enters the community trom two major sources - Sorenson
Lighterage and Togiak Fisheries. Conversations with Togiak
residents confirmed that the homes were extremely cold in the
winter. This village is considered to be a prime candidate for
weatherization and other conservation measures.
The AVEC generators at Togiak operate at an energy conversion
efficiency of 23.7%. The system losses for electrical distri-
bution amounted to only 8% of the total generation. The higher
generation efficiency reflects the higher efficiency of larger
generators. It appears that sufficient waste heat can be
captured from these generators to provide all the heating
requirements for the state school. This would represent a
significant reduction of oil consumption in the village.
Existing Power Facilities
Ali electricity in Togiak (with the exception of the National
Guard facility) is diesel generated. The character of the
community's generators‘ are summarized in the following table.
VILLAGE OWNER NO. SIZE MAKE/MODEL | VOLTAGE TOTAL
Togiak AVEC 1 300 KATO 300SR9D 240/416,39
i 160 KATO 160SU9D 240/416,38 560 |
1 100 Allis’ Chalmers 240/416,39 |
8GBK {
! PHS 1 50 Caterpillar D8800 208,39 so |
STATE 2 73) Delco A.C. 120,19
SCHOOL
ZL 25 Kohler 25COT61 120,19 7S
KACHEMAK x 50 N/A N/A 95
SEAFOOD
at 35 N/A N/A
als 10 N/A N/A
PROPOSED 72 350 N/A N/A 700 ;
TOGIAK '
ESKIMO
SEAFOOD
4
Existing Heating Facilities
The largest consumers of fuel for space heating in the communi-
ty is the school. The BIA school uses oil-fired boilers to heat
water for distribution to circulating hot water systems. Water
for domestic use and showers is heated through heat exchangers
in the same boilers. This large consumer of oil with a hot
water distribution system is a prime candidate for receipt of
waste or cogenerated heat from power production.
Residential and other small buildings within the community are
generally heated with simple drip type 50-100,000 Btu oil burner
stoves. Heat output trom these stoves is difficult to control;
the lowest settings generally provide more heat than is required
in the months with the fewest heating degree days, when only
minimal heat is required. Many homes make use of oil-fired cook
stoves for space heating in addition to cooking and water
heating. Homes in these communities generally have no means of
heat distribution other than radiation and convection from the
stove itself.
Togiak Energy Use
Togiak presently depends almost entirely upon fuel oil for space
heating and upon diesel fuel for power generation. Driftwood
and brush are used for steam baths, but the amount used is too
small to impact the town's overall consumption figures. Fuel is
delivered by the North Star III barge or by lighterage out ot
Dillingham. Residents of Togiak also purchase signiticant
quantities of fuel from nearby Togiak Fisheries. The community
consumes approximately 244,300 gallons of heating oil, with
about 130,000 gallons of this for residential consumption. As
in the other communtiies studied, the homes here are generally
in neeed of weatherization. It appears that even new housing is
only minimally insulated.
785,000 KWh electricity were generated in the past year, with
271,000 consumed by residential and small commercial users. The
local fish processor formerly purchased power from AVEC, but
began generating its own power when commercial rates increased.
A new fishery is planned for the town and will be a large con-
sumer of electricity during summer months, but the new fishery
is presently planning to generate its own electricity.
It appears that Togiak residents spend about 16% of their annual
cash income on heating fuel. (This is an exceptionally high
figure and may result from unreliable estimates of total fuel
oil entering the town. The sources of fuel delivery information
were unable to provide definitive figures regarding exact
amounts delivered to Togiak). Ten percent of the income is
spent on electric bills, bringing the total energy expenditures
to about 26% of the annual household income.
Projects Which Will Influence Togiak's Future Energy Needs
The only public capital improvement project noted in Togiak was
an airfield upgrading project which may be completed during
1982. It is anticipated, however, that an expansion of local
fish processing facilities is quite likely for this community.
Large seasonal fluctuations in population patterns are likely to
result from this activity.
Population Growth
Best estimates of the population growth of Togiak indicate a
population of about 800 by the year 2000 (Figure 1).
Community Meeting
The community meeting participants included the Mayor, David
Nanalook, and members of the Traditional Council. Those present
at the meeting were Joe Nick, Henry Pavian, David Nanalook,
POPULATION (Y) 600
500
400 --
300 =f
200 | 100
1930 1940
FIGURE 1.
TOGIAK
1950 1960 1970
CURVILINEAR PROJECTION
x
1980 1990
X ACTUAL DATA, ISER &
U.S. CENSUS
— PROJECTION
70
2000
YEARS FROM 1930 (xX)
YEAR
Andrew Franklin, and Inuska Babyla. The meeting was very infor-
mative and those present had obviously already been examining
alternatives to diesel generation.
There was much discussion of building conditions and energy
costs. There seems to be a preterence tor hydroelectricity,
but wind is also looked upon with favor. Project personnel were
told of a river with much higher flow rates than that investi-
gated by the Alaska Power Administration. The river is called
the Quigmy. . (Project personnel later chartered Ute Air for an
aerial reconnaissance of the river as a result of suggestions by
the Council and others.) The river is said to have some fish,
but those to whom we spoke think it is not a major salmon
spawning stream. The people of Togiak were very interested in
the protection of the fish resource and would not allow a pro-
ject which could endanger the fish harvest. The residents of
Togiak generally depend upon commercial fishing to support their
families.
Wind generation was of general interest. Project personnel were
told ot tairly consistant and high winds.
Peat was brietly discussed, but David Nanalook pointed out that
it would be difficult to harvest peat because of the Wildlife
Refuge status of land which surrounds the town. This land
status is expected to be a regulatory constraint upon hydro
development on the Quigmy, as well.
A very strong preference for local corporation management of
any alternative power generating facility was expressed.
Energy Conservation
Energy conservation is usually one of the most cost effective
and readily available methods of reducing energy consumption and
costs. Energy conservation herein means retro-fitting or
modifying any existing heat process. This can be done by
increasing combustion efficiency, or by reducing the losses from
the heat using process. Villages in western Alaska can benefit
from the energy conservation practices which relate primarily to
weatherization and improved combustion efficiency.
The homes in the reconnaissance study area averaged '750 square
feet in size, were single story, built on piles, having exposed
floors. Some of them had skirts around the piling to reduce
cold air circulation under the building. If these buildings are
occupied by a family present during the day, then oil consump-
tion is typically on the order of 150 gallons per month in the
colder months, resulting in heating costs close to $300. The
technology to reduce energy consumption in these homes exists
and could be economically applied. The requirements are simple
and there should be no environmental or health impacts.
Generator Waste Heat
At Togiak, generation ot electricity produces about 7,340 x
106 Btu/year waste heat. Of this amount, about 4,790 x 106
Btu/year is recoverable. This exceeds the 2,830 x 106
Btu/year heat output from the school's boilers but is substan-
tially less than the 8,770 x 106 Btu/year delivered by
residential heating systems. Transmission distances are vari-
able, and a distribution system will require careful planning.
The waste heat resource at Togiak is significant in magnitude
and quality and can provide an alternative source of heat for
the town's consumption.
Wind
Only a limited amount of wind data is available for estimating
the Togiak Bay wind resource. Some recorded wind data for
Platinum is available for the period of April, 1939, through
March of 1941. The total recording period was 500 days and the
wind distribution was as follows:
Mph &
Calm 5
4-15 Si
16-31 39
32-47 5
over 47 <1%
The weighted mean of these winds is 13.1 mph. Difficulties in
extrapolating this data to Togiak include:
o Shorter recording period than statistically desirable
o No indication of seasonal wind distribution
o Ditferent topography and wind exposure
A small amount of additional data is available for nearby Kwigil-
lingok. This data is available for a period of one month only,
April-May of 1980. The mean wind speed during that recording
period was 13.56 mph.
Winds in this region of the state are said to be "weak and
persistent" during the summer months but much stronger during
the winter months. Winter periods of high winds (60-70 mph) for
several days at a time have been described. This is likely to
indicate a good match of wind resource availability and electric
load and should allow economy of scale with minimal storage.
The local people describe Goodnews Bay as being a very windy
location. The principal ot the BIA school, began continuous
recording of wind at Goodnews in 1980. His strip chart re-
cordings are sent to BIA regional offices in Bethel and Juneau.
(An attempt to obtain reduced data from the BIA was unsuccess-
ful.)
This program of recording should be encouraged and possibly
assisted by the Power Authority, since it will provide extremely
valuable data for future planning. Other BIA schools partici-
pating in this program are: Alakanak, Kwethluk, Kwigillingole,
Nightmute, Tununak and Chefornak.
It is noted that winds of 60-70 mph for several days at a time
have been reported at Togiak. (It is uncertain, however, how
accurate these velocity estimates are.)
The Army National Guard has installed a 2 KW wind generator at
Togiak and is attempting to measure wind velocities, as well.
The recording device in use requires that daily readings be made.
Until these daily readings are made and analyzed it is difficult
to estimate the wind resource at Togiak. Attempts should be made
to obtain more reliable readings at Togiak. A school project in
which the children measure the wind daily (or more frequently)
all year would be helpful.
Togiak probably has a wind resource worthy of further investiga-
tion but additional data is needed.
Hydro
Two different hydro sites were considered in this investigation.
The Kurtluk River, with a drainage area at dam site of 22 square
miles, was assessed first.
U.S.G.S.
Coefficients Flow
Mean annual low monthly 1 cfs/mi2 22 cfs
Mean annual 3 66
Mean annual peak 10 220
The Alaska Power Administration reports a flow of 10 cfs on
August 6, 1979, for a drainage area of 20 sq. mi. which converts
to a unit runoff of 1/2 cfs/mi2. This appears to be very low,
especially since the report states rain and fog hindered the
field investigations in the area. The measured value is well
below the general regional values and the values found on other
/
streams in the study area. It appears there is some unusual
hydrologic phenomena in the drainage. It is difficult to specu-
late just what causes this apparent anomaly but perhaps some
gain-loss measurements along the stream would provide some useful
data.
Based on the estimate of potential hydroelectric power, it
appears winter flows are expected to be much lower than the mea-
sured August flow of 10 cfs. This may be due to freezing of the
stream during the winter months; however, no such information is
given.
The Quigmy River was recommended by local residents for recon-
naissance as part of this investigation. The drainage area at
proposed dam site is 85 square miles.
U.S.G.S.
Coefficients Flow
Mean annual low monthly 1 cfs/mi2 85 cfs
Mean annual 3 255
Mean annual peak 10 850
There is no measured stream flow data available on this
stream. The Quigmy River drainage is adjacent to the Kurtluk
River drainage so it could be expected that similar relation-
ships hold between unit runoff and discharge. However, since the
regional analysis results is not supported by the measured dis-
charge on the Kurtluk River, the computed values on the Quigmy
River must be viewed with some skepticism.
The Quigmy River appears to have substantial potential for
hydroelectric generation. Transmission costs over the 7-10 mile
distance between the generation site and Togiak, along with the
dam costs, are expected to make hydro power a very capital inten-
sive project.
Peat
The quality of peat occurrances in Togiak is expected to be very
poor due to active drainages and unfavorable surface geology.
Some limited organic deposits may be suitable for marginal space
heating needs but the probability of utilization for any but
absolute minimal needs is remote.
Solar
Solar incidence at all of the study communities is concentrated
in the summer months. Although lacking in intensity, the daily
solar input from long summer daylight hours is considerable.
Until annual storage becomes technically and economically feasi-
ble, it is not anticipated that solar energy will be competitive
with other energy sources for the production of power. However,
housing design can make use of passive solar input.
Energy Alternatives for Togiak
The following alternatives have been analyzed for Togiak and are
considered worthy of further investigation.
Togiak Alternative Plan A
This plan for Togiak is based on the installation of a waste
heat capture system associated with diesel generators currently
providing heat and power for the school building. The school is
conveniently located approximately 420' from the AVEC plant and
is presently using a hot water heating system. The existing
radiators and heat exchangers in the school could be utilized in
the new heat capture system to reduce the total cost of obtaining
the usetul heat energy.
The waste heat available from the diesel power generators is
sufficient to fully offset all the oil useage at the school. The
diesel generators have an estimated heat input of 9580 x 10°
Btu in 1979, with a possible 4790 x 106 Btu available for
building heating. The school consumed 4725 x 106 Btu of which
about 70% or 3307 x 106 were delivered to the space. The other
30% was lost in the combustion process.
Togiak Alternative Plan B
Based on projection of water flow from the drainage system
and the topography, it appears that a substantial hydro power
facility could be developed on the Quigmy River about 12 miles
west of Togiak. Minimum stream flows of 85 cfs are projected
and with the construction of a dam, up to 100 feet of head could
be achieved. The dam would provide storage ot water to allow
flexibility in meeting the demand variation of the village
electrical load.
No data are available on the peak flow or flow variation of
this water system. Visual observation of the river and estimate
of the drainage area, rainfall amounts and other factors
effecting runoff are the basis for this analysis.
The village has a projected electrical peak demand of less
than 300 KW (not including the two seasonally operational sea-
food plants) to the year 2001. This capacity can be met with a
hydraulic turbine generator operating with a head of 55' and
discharged 75 cfs.
The facility would consist of a dam approximately 60' high
by 1000' long, a power house with a 300 kw hydraulic turbine,
and approximately 14 miles of electrical transmission line. This
transmission line could be candidate for single wire ground
return system.
The existing diesel generators could be retained for backup and
the existing distribution system in the village would be
retained.
Summary ot Recommendations tor Togiak
Preterred Energy Alter-
native (in order of
earliest feasibility)
Recommended Resource Assessments
and Feasibility Studies
1. Energy conservation No resource assessment or teasibili-
» building insulation ty study indicated; immediate action
- building envelope required to bring Energy Audit. and/
infiltration or weatherization program to this
« improved combustion community.
2. Waste heat capture from Obtain baseline data on heat availa-
diesel generators bility for specific generators; per-
form preliminary design and detailed
feasibility study.
3. Hydroelectric power Begin stream gauging and investi-
from Quigmy River gation of fish habitat and spawning
potential in summer 1981 if possi-
ble; perform site analysis; partici-
pate in land use study in 1981 to
attempt to change land designation
west of Togiak and including Quigmy
River (presently Wildlife Refuge
under BLM); pursue possibility of
tradeoff of native or state lands.
Costs and Benefits of the Proposed Alternatives
Plan A, waste heat capture, appears to have potential for
decreasing the cost of electricity in Togiak relative to the
costs of continued diesel generation without waste heat capture.
Further detailed analysis of this option is recommended.
It appears that a hydroelectric installation on the Quigmy River
would lead to significant cost savings. Major problems asso-
ciated with such a power project are 1) the relative remoteness
of the site and its distance from Togiak, 2) the potential
impact on the anadromous fish population and/or the costs
associated with protecting this population, and 3) the Wildlife
Refuge designation of the land surrounding the potential hydro
site. However, none of these problems are insurmountable, and
further consideration of this option is recommended.