HomeMy WebLinkAboutBPMC Meetings Febuary 24, 1994 1BRADLEY PMC VOTING
DATE:
Agenda Item No. uA HE Wize
begat Syperars Koll Cal] so [se | on iy WO | ue eel fal |
CITY OF SEWARD 01% (7T_] [EEE Ez
MATANUSKA ELEC Assoc ~” 14% [Z]_] Fi Zo
CHUGACH ELEC Assoc 30% [Z]]_] ToC Se
HOMER ELEC ASSOC i I~ FEL Mee
GOLDENVALELECASSoc 1% (ZI | |O$-EC ES)
MUNI LIGHT & POWER 26% 7] ES ZY L | [7]
ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY” Fl ES Lea
A=4+ OVER 51% B = AEA CONCUR With A
D= MAJORITY
VOTING METHOD A:
Requiring four yeas with 51% of utilities, with no
AEA vote:
1) Procedures for scheduling, production and
dispatch of project power.
2) Establishment of procedures for use of each
purchaser's water allocation (AEA assent
required for license requirements).
3) Selection among alternative methods that do
not involve AEA for funding required project
work.
VOTING METHOD B:
Requiring 4 yeas with 51% of utilities and AEA
concurrence:
1) Arranging operation and maintenance of
project.
2) Adoption of budget of annual project costs.
VOTE(93Q3/BC5272)
3) Establishment of FY estimated annual
payment obligation and schedule of each
purchaser.
4) Determination of annual project costs after
each FY.
5) Evaluation of necessity for and scheduling of
required project work.
6) Determination of appropriate amount of
insurance.
7) Adoption of additional minimum funding
amounts for renewal and contingency reserve
fund above that required by bond resolution.
8) Selection among alternate methods that
involve AEA for funding required project
work.
9) Adoption or amendment of procedural
committee rules (except dispute resolution).
10) Adoption of project maintenance schedules.
11) Determination of rules, procedures and
accounts necessary to manage project when
no bonds outstanding.
Evaluation and approval of optional project
work and compensation for such work.
12)
Application of insurance claims proceeds not
governed by bond resolution.
13)
Approval of procedures and any individual
utility agreements relating to electric power
reserves for project.
14)
15) Approval of consultants.
VOTING METHOD C:
Unanimous vote by all (including AEA)
YOTING METHOD D:
Majority vote (including AEA)
Election of Officers
Bradley Lake PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING _2f2¢ fd
Aidea. board Kaos (Location)
PLEASE SIGN IN
No. NAME REPRESENTING
1 |S4 rece ak LLL LA. DEL?
2 | Leas aft a G- CA en 5 a7 - 3 | Dar Fare HE 4
4 a | Beth Abeh
5
6
Phewwe He | fuus | 6 | KZ | Le P ny Ann. ce
92Q2\IT9884
Bradley Lake Projecc Management Committee
Meeting Minutes - February 24, 1994
Page 7 of 7
12.
13.
Affirmation of Budget Subcommittee’s Decision Regarding
FY ‘94 Revised Budget
MOTION: Mr. Ritchey moved that the PMC affirm the Budget
Subcommittee’s decision that the FY ‘94 budget be main-
tained at the same level as the original budget adopted by
AEA and that approximately $620,000 from that budget be
reassigned to the Homer O&M contract. Seconded by Mr.
Stahr.
Mr. Saxton asked that the motion be amended to approve the
transfer of $620,000 to the Homer O&M budget, but not that
the Committee affirm the FY ‘94 budget, because the FY '94
budget had not been adopted by the Committee. Mr. Ritchey
concurred and amended his original motion with the consent
of the second. A roll call vote was taken, and the
amended motion and the motion passed unanimously.
Technical Standards on Preventative Maintenance
MOTION: Mr. Ritchey moved that the PMC request the Operations and Dispatch Subcommittee to recommend tech-
nical standards for preventative maintenance on the
Bradley Lake Project. Seconded by Mr. Kelly. After
hearing discussion, the question was called, and a roll call vote was taken. The motion passed unanimously.
COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Next Meeting Date - There was a consensus of the Committee
that the next PMC meeting will be held on Thursday, March
31, 1994, at 10:00 a.m., the location to be determined at
a later time and the Committee members duly advised.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business of the Committee, the meeting
was adjourned.
BY:
David L. Hig
ATTEST: Ue Co
Dennis V. McCrohan, Secretary
Bradley Lake Proje Management Committee
Meeting Minutes - February 24, 1994
Page 6 of 7
Lids
utilities should discuss whether they want to have a
representative work with him or have a third party review
the proposal and come to an independent decision.
Mr. Highers reminded the Committee that they had discussed
this matter previously and had concluded it was not in
their best interest to proceed with it. Since that time,
Nuveen had reworked their proposal and had come in at
about twice the original amount, and the PMC had looked to
the Municipal Attorneys for their position on this issue.
If the PMC is in favor of reconsidering this proposal, he
suggested that they employ an external group to act as
financial advisor or assign an internal group to assist
Mr. Saxton in reviewing Nuveen’s current activities in
relation to its most recent proposal.
In response to Mr. Yerkes’ question, Mr. Highers confirmed
that the purpose of the bond refinancing was to save
money, and the savings have been quantified. Mr. Saxton
stated that Nuveen had suggested their proposal, which is
based on a variable interest rate, would save between
$200,000 and $300,000 per year. Mr. Saxton explained that
the PMC’s first question was legal objections. He said
the original Nuveen proposal had been formulated on cut-
ting edge legal theory, and Municipal Attorneys had not
been comfortable with it. Hence, the PMC rejected
Nuveen’s original proposal.
With regard to the new Nuveen proposal, upon initial
review, Municipal Attorneys have provided no legal reason
not to proceed; however, further analysis should be
undertaken with regard to the level of savings, other
risks associated with the proposal, etc., so that a
prudent business decision can be reached.
Mr. Stahr stated that he was in favor of following the
advice of AEA’s financial advisors. Mr. Highers directed
that a subcommittee composed of Joe Griffith, Mary Anne
Pease, and Bob Hanson be formed for the purpose of working
with Mr. Saxton in reviewing Nuveen’s proposal as well as
the work of PFA and reporting its findings to the PMC.
Mary Anne Pease was appointed as Chair of the subcommit-
tee. Further discussion was heard.
BUSINESS NEW
Approval of Legal Expenses and Other Payments
MOTION: Mr. Ritchey moved to approve payment of
$15,320.32 for Committee legal expenses for the month of
January 1994. Seconded by Mr. Kelly. A roll call vote
was taken, and the motion passed unanimously.
Bradley Lake Projecc Management Committee
Meeting Minutes - February 24, 1994
Page 5 of 7
Mr. Yerkes added that the Homer’s concerns are minor, but
Mr. Baldwin had been not been available to participate in
discussions. Mr. Saxton said he would like to get the
issues resolved as quickly as possible.
C. Transition Duties - Mr. McCrohan reported that the Com-
mittee had not reached resolution regarding administrative
duties relative to FERC licensing. He said AEA was
responsible for those duties through FY ‘94 and has pro-
posed in their FY ‘95 budget that AEA continue to perform
those duties through FY ‘95. The matter will come before
the Committee for consideration.
Mr. McCrohan stated that the Authority is also prepared to
continue to perform the duties of water management and
hydrology studies; however, due to a provision in the HEA
O&M Agreement, Homer intends to pick up those duties
during the last couple of months of 1994. This outstand-
ing issue also requires resolution by the PMC.
Referencing Mr. Ritchey’s comments earlier regarding con-
tracting secretarial services, Mr. McCrohan stated that
this responsibility will be deleted from AEA’s FY '95
budget unless the Committee directs AEA to continue to be
responsible for those services, but the intent is to
relinquish this responsibility to Homer.
Mr. McCrohan reported that funds had been set aside to
continue all of the budget coordination performed by AEA
in the past. However, the PMC needs to decide if the
Budget Subcommittee will perform that entire function or
whether AEA will continue to provide support in this area.
Mr. McCrohan stated that the 920 account for travel
reimbursement for utility representatives to attend
meetings is still under the AEA account, and the PMC
should decide if they wish to retain or delete it.
D. Bond Refunding - Mr. Saxton reported that there had been
an exchange of letters between the Authority and Nuveen in
which Mr. Jim Seagraves of Nuveen had proposed a somewhat
complicated refunding on the Bradley bonds. AEA’s outside
financial advisors had reviewed the proposal, and they had
recommended that the PMC not proceed with the proposed
bond refunding. Therefore, it is AEA’s recommendation
that PMC not proceed with this transaction.
Mr. Saxton said he had been requested at the RUG meetings
to discuss the proposal with Nuveen and the Anchorage
lawyers, which he has done, and Mr. Doug Rosenberg of
Preston, Thorgrimson, found no legal problems with
proceeding with the transaction. Mr. Saxton said the
Bradley Lake Proje Management Committee
Meeting Minutes - February 24, 1994
Page 4 of 7
10. OLD BUSINESS
A. Spinning Reserves Update - Mr. Lovas reported that the Reliability Criteria Committee (RCC) had finalized its status reports, and they have been submitted to the ASCC for consideration at their March 6th meeting. Mr. Lovas
summarized the recommendations of the RCC as follows:
# Continue to investigate various aspects of operating
reserves, such as the policy, quality, distribution of system response criteria; and study system generation and configuration conditions to quantify the spin requirement.
@ Redefine the RCC’s tasks as to specific aspects of the criteria rather than a generalized assignment.
@ Generally serve as coordinator on information flows on the interconnected operations studies, such as storage
devices and reliability enhancements.
# Undertake the review of existing planning reliability criteria to ensure that all participants are aware of the material.
# Undertake economic evaluations of existing and proposed
criteria, including economic impacts of alternative planning criteria.
# Maintain the railbelt G&T databases.
@ Establish time schedules for rotation of the Chair- manship.
@ Administration of the tasks assigned to University of
Alaska, Fairbanks.
The RCC will also submit a copy of the draft Operating
Reserve Criteria to the ASCC as a status report.
Mr. Lovas reported that the RCC had also discussed finalization of the UAF Engineering Department proposal to develop an electromagnetic transient program database and model for studying particular interconnection problems.
Master Operating Agreement Update - Mr. Saxton reported
that the Committee had discussed both the Master Operating Agreement and the HEA O&M Agreement and had approved the HEA O&M Agreement. Mr. Saxton reported that he was aware that internal discussions are ongoing at HEA regarding outstanding issues. Mr. Saxton said he is awaiting word from Mr. Baldwin that Homer is ready to proceed.
Bradley Lake Proje Management Committee
Meeting Minutes - February 24, 1994
Page 3 of 7
April 2, 1994. Mr. Ritchey recommended that the PMC schedule
a meeting prior to that date to address the FY ‘95 budget.
Recommendations:
(1) The Budget Subcommittee decided that the FY ‘94 budget
should be maintained at the same level as the original budget
adopted by AEA, with approximately $620,000 from that budget
to be reassigned to the Homer O&M contract. Mr. Ritchey
requested that the PMC affirm the Budget Subcommittee’s
decision. Mr. Ritchey added that the FY ‘94 budget will be
higher than the FY ‘95 budget due to start-up costs.
(2) The Budget Subcommittee recommended that the PMC request
the Operation and Dispatch Subcommittee to review the techni-
cal standards for preventative maintenance. Mr. Ritchey said
that Four Dam Pool’s standards are being used as a template at
this time, but preventative maintenance impacts the budget,
and that template should be reviewed and approved or revised
as necessary to reflect the technical standards for the
Bradley Lake Project.
Mr. Ritchey reported that the Subcommittee had briefly dis-
cussed whether payment should be made by PMC to contractors
attending meetings as participants. Mr. Yerkes clarified that
contractors who are board or committee members would expect to
attend those meetings without reimbursement. However, when
contractors who are not board or committee members are
required to attend other meetings for the purpose of defending
an issue, it is felt that would be a project cost under the
contract and subject to reimbursement. Discussion was heard.
7. OPERATION AND DISPATCH SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
There was no Operation and Dispatch Subcommittee report.
8. INSURANCE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. McCrohan reported that the Insurance Subcommittee met Feb-
ruary 10, 1994, and notes from that meeting had been provided
to the Committee. Mr. McCrohan stated that both Homer and AEA
were in the process of investigating the concerns brought up
in the course of the February meeting, and Mr. McCrohan anti-
cipated that all outstanding issues regarding the insurance
would be resolved by the end of March or early April. The
next meeting of the Insurance Subcommittee is scheduled for
the second week in March.
9. REVIEW OF PROJECT STATUS
Mr. McCrohan reported that Mr. Eberle was not present, but
there was no change in the project status.
Bradley Lake Proje Management Committee
Meeting Minutes - February 24, 1994
Page 2 of 7
PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
AGENDA COMMENTS
Bond Refunding (Saxton) was added as Item D. under No. 10, Old
Business. Affirmation of Budget Subcommittee’s Decision
Regarding FY ‘94 Revised Budget (Ritchey) was added as Item B.
under No. 11, New Business. Technical Standards on Preventa-
tive Maintenance (Ritchey) was added as Item C. under No. 11,
New Business. There were no other comments regarding the
agenda. The agenda was approved as modified.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994
MOTION: Mr. Ritchey moved to approve the minutes of the
January 25, 1994 minutes. Seconded by Mr. McCrohan. The
following corrections were noted:
On page 4, the first sentence of the second para-
graph that reads:
"In response to Mr. Wolf’s comment regarding...
for the Soldotna SBC, Mr. Story advised that
the Budget Subcommittee is considering...."
was revised to read:
"In response to Mr. Wolf’s comment regarding...
for the Soldotna SVC, Mr. Story advised that
HEA is considering...."
The spelling of Four Dam Pool was corrected on
pages 10 and 11.
There being no further corrections, the minutes were approved
as revised.
BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. Ritchey reported that the Budget Subcommittee had met the
previous day and briefly discussed contracting a secretarial
service for the purpose of recording and preparing meeting
minutes for FY '95. A proposal will be presented at the next
meeting of the Board.
The Subcommittee discussed primarily the HEA side of the FY
‘95 budget at length; the AIDEA side will be addressed at the
next Subcommittee meeting. The FY ‘95 budget must be adopted
by the Bradley Lake Project Management Committee (PMC) by
BRADLEY LAKE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority BSPMc Board Room a Thursday, February 24, 1994 Rens.
10:00 a.m. Ylaa lau.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Highers called the meeting of the Bradley Lake Hydro- electric Project Management Committee to order at 10:10 a.m. in the Board Room of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority in Anchorage, Alaska, to conduct the business of the Committee per the agenda and public notice. Six Committee members were present, and a quorum was established.
ROLL CALL
Alaska Energy Authority
Dennis McCrohan, Designated Representative
Chugach Electric Association
David L. Highers, Designated Representative and Chairman Golden Valley Electric Association
Mike Kelly, Designated Representative
City of Seward
Dave Calvert, Designated Representative
Matanuska Electric Association
Ken Ritchey, Designated Representative
Municipal Light & Power
Tom Stahr, Designated Representative
Not Present
Homer Electric Association
Norm Story, Designated Representative
Others Present:
Stan Sieczkowski, AEA/AIDEA
Larry Wolf, AEA/AIDEA
Sharron Sigafoos, AIDEA
Eva Carpenter, AIDEA
John S. Cooley, Chugach Electric Association
Tom Lovas, Chugach Electric Association
David Burlingame, Chugach Electric Association
Joe Griffith, Chugach Electric Association
Ron Saxton, Ater, Wynne, Hewitt, Dodson & Skerritt
Tim McConnell, Anchorage Municipal Light & Power
Bob Price, Anchorage Municipal Light & Power
Mary Ann Pease, Anchorage Municipal Light & Power
Dave Fair, Homer Electric Association
Myles Yerkes, Homer Electric Association
Bob Hufman, Utilities Consulting Services
Bradley Evans, Golden Valley Electric Association
Vince Mottola, Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System