HomeMy WebLinkAboutBPMC Meeting - June 17, 1993 1Revised Action Nos. - September 7, 1993
RECORD wOPY
FILE NO
Ro 3-t1 mint “tienen 2 BRADLEY LAKE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE = & 1174/93
APPROVED MEETING MINUTES
June 17, 1993
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Highers called the Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project Management
Committee to order at 10:10 a.m. in the Training Room at Chugach Electric
Association in Anchorage, Alaska to conduct the business of the Committee per
the agenda and the public notice.
2. ROLL CALL
Alaska Energy Authority
Brent N. Petrie, Designated Representative
Chugach Electric Association
David L. Highers, Designated Representative and Chairman
Golden Valley Electric Association
Mike Kelly, Designated Representative
City of Seward
Dave Calvert, Designated Representative
Homer Electric Association
Norm Story, Designated Representative
Matanuska Electric Association
Ken Ritchey, Designated Representative
Municipal Light & Power
Hank Nikkels, Alternate Representative
Others Present:
Ron Saxton, Ater, Wynne, Hewitt, Dodson & Skerritt
Bob Hufman, Alaska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative
David Burlingame, Chugach Electric Association
John Cooley, Chugach Electric Association
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 2 of 9
Jim Borden, Chugach Electric Association
Tom Lovas, Chugach Electric Association
Dan Bloomer, Chugach Electric Association
Jim Hall, Matanuska Electric Association
Mary Ann Pease, Municipal Light & Power
Tim McConnell, Municipal Light & Power
Bob Price, Municipal Light & Power
Dave Fair, Homer Electric Association
Ron Garzini, Alaska Energy Authority
David R. Eberle, Alaska Energy Authority
Eric Marchegiani, Alaska Energy Authority
Stanley E. Sieczkowski, Alaska Energy Authority
Denise Burger, Alaska Energy Authority
33 PUBLIC COMMENT
There being no public comment, the meeting continued to the next agenda item.
4. AGENDA COMMENTS
The following items were added to the agenda:
12.B. Approval of FY94 Payment Obligation
12.C. Approval of Other Payments
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 13, 1993
The minutes of the May 13, 1993 Bradley Project Management Committee
meeting were approved as submitted.
6. TECHNICAL COORDINATING SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. Burlingame reported that the TCS had not met. The TCS expects to meet
in July to review the results of the SVC system tests and to define the long term
operating guidelines of the Project.
ie BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
A. Bradley Lake Construction Cost Audit Update
Mr. Ritchey expected the final report to be distributed in one week. The
Budget Subcommittee will meet in two weeks to discuss the report. Plans
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 3 of 9
are being made for a representative of Metzler & Associates to present the
report to the BPMC.
Bradley Lake O&M Cost Audit Update
The FY92 O&M cost audit is being reviewed and the Subcommittee is
awaiting clarification of some questions.
Other Budget Subcommittee Issues:
Mr. Ritchey noted that an error had been discovered in the approved FY94
O&M budget. Cost for the USGS stream gage program was included in
the narrative, however, did not appear as a line item. Other budget line
items will be adjusted to provide for the cost of the program ($110,000).
The changes will not effect the budget total.
Mr. Ritchey informed the Committee that the Budget Subcommittee was
preparing a resolution formalizing the authority of the Subcommittee to
make certain changes to the O&M budget. The resolution will be ready for
consideration at the next BPMC meeting. Other items being discussed by
the Subcommittee are the HEA Fritz Creek line costs and the CEA
wheeling issue.
Chairman Highers asked what impact the recent legislation affecting AEA
would have on the Bradley O&M budget. Mr. Petrie recommended that
the Committee wait until December or January, when new operation
arrangements were expected to be in place, before altering the budget or
utility payment schedule. Mr. Petrie added AEA was incurring unexpected
costs related to preparation for the transfer of operation responsibilities and
the on-site labor negotiations.
Referring to a memorandum issued by AEA, Mr. Petrie stated AEA was
requesting guidance from the Committee on the selection of an operation
and maintenance contractor for Bradley Lake (Attachment 1). Mr. Petrie
informed the Committee that a meeting of Four-Dam Pool, Bradley Lake
and other utilities was scheduled for July 7, 1993 at AEA to discuss the
transfer of tasks handled by AEA to the utilities. Mr. Kelly expressed
concern over the continuing availability of Energy Authority staff to
oversee the transition and recommended that the BPMC assert its authority
as the contracting power. Acknowledging there had been several previous
discussions on the BPMC authority to contract, Mr. Petrie stated AEA was
responsible for contracting Project operation and maintenance, however,
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 4 of 9
the Power Sales Agreement gave the BPMC the authority to approve the
contract.
8. AGREEMENTS SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
10.
Mr. Sieczkowski reported the Agreements Subcommittee had not met since the
last BPMC meeting.
OPERATION & DISPATCH SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. Marchegiani reported the O&D Subcommittee met June 3, 1993. Under the
direction of the Subcommittee, AEA has contracted SWEC to perform a two
phase hydraulic transient stability analysis at a reservoir elevation below 1080".
April and May reservoir inflows were reported to be higher than anticipated. It is
speculated that the increased inflow is early snow melt due to the unusually warm
Spring weather. If the increased flow continues, a water reallocation is expected
about July 1.
Removal of loose rock above the water line at the fish water bypass intake channel
is complete. Mr. Marchegiani informed the Committee that material still remained
below the water line. AEA is investigating methods and costs to remove the
remaining material. Mr. Eberle stated that a recent sonar scan indicated debris
around one of the trash racks installed during the winter, however unless a low
reservoir level and high winds occur, the remaining debris is not expected to shift
or cause additional problems. At a reservoir level low enough to potentially cause
a problem, equipment can be brought in to remove the debris and remedy the
problem. Maintenance will probably be delayed until next year or when a low
enough reservoir occurs to facilitate the use of heavy equipment.
Mr. Marchegiani reported that the Woodward governor modification and testing
had been completed. Mr. Burlingame added the governor modification performed
well, doubling the governor response rate.
REVIEW OF PROJECT STATUS
Mr. Eberle informed the Committee that the new breaker for Soldotna was
expected to be delivered by mid-August. ABB has delayed the capacitor
replacement to September or October and has proposed a reduced number of
capacitors for replacement. AEA will either require an extended warranty or insist
upon full replacement of the capacitors. In response to concerns raised by CEA,
AEA is reviewing SVC protection controls with ABB, which may result in some
modifications. AEA has requested information from ABB on the cost of additional
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 5 of 9
11.
system studies. Mr. Eberle noted the AEA Board of Directors approved the final
Project budget of $314,500,000 at its May meeting. Documents are being
prepared to release the surplus appropriation ($12.1 million) back to the State.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Spinning Reserve / Under Frequency Load Shedding Update
Mr. Lovas reported institution of the under frequency load shedding
schedule was delayed until the end of June. Revisions proposed by GVEA
are currently under review. The relays are in place and ready to set.
The Alaska Systems Coordinating Council Reliability Criteria Committee
(ASCC - RCC) is reviewing final comments on the spinning reserve
proposals. The Committee expects to finalize a recommendation in the
near future.
Bradley Scheduling vs. Spin Requirement Update
Mr. Saxton distributed a summary chart of the spinning reserve issue
comments submitted from the utilities (Attachment 2). Noting the
summary included several issues other than Bradley spin, Mr. Kelly
recommended that the focus be narrowed to Bradley spin. Mr. Kelly
pointed out that several of the issues were presently being addressed by the
ASCC. Mr. Lovas stated the ASCC-RCC could handle the system
response and technical questions, however, not the related legal issues (i.e.,
responsibility for spinning reserve). Mr. Saxton will work with the RCC
(specifically, Chairman Tom Lovas) to delineate the technical and legal
issues. Mr. Lovas and Mr. Saxton will report back to the BPMC (Action
93-164).
BPMC Control Over O&M Decisions and Agreements - Master
Agreement
Mr. Saxton reported that no further activity had occurred on the master
operating agreement due to questions created by the legislated changes at
AEA, however, the State Attorney General's office is currently
reviewing the draft master operating agreement. Mr. Saxton stated that
he and Mr. Sieczkowski were in accord on the basic substance of the
agreement and the BPMC contractual relationship in the agreement.
Mr. Sieczkowski informed the Committee that he would be meeting with
the Assistant Attorney General this afternoon to discuss final comments
on the draft agreement. Mr. Kelly expressed concern over the handling
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 6 of 9
of contracting an operator for Bradley Lake - specifically, if the master
operating agreement provided contracting authority to the BPMC.
Mr. Saxton responded that the issue was taken care of by the proposed
master operating agreement. Mr. Saxton requested direction from the
BPMC on proceeding with the development of the master operating
agreement, recognizing that the Committee may prefer to wait until
other issues related to the transition of AEA are resolved.
Referring to AEA's letter requesting direction from the BPMC on the
selection of an operator for Bradley Lake, Mr. Garzini stated AEA
would, most likely, be responsive to the BPMC's choice. Expressing
the need to provide Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
(AIDEA) information and a schedule on the transfer of project O&M
responsibilities to the utilities, Mr. Garzini asked the utilities to submit
suggestions. Mr. Garzini added that, more than ever, it was necessary
for the utilities to work together in order to accomplish all that needed to
be done. Mr. Garzini reiterated that AEA would be responsive to the
BPMC.
Mr. Saxton advocated completion of the master operating agreement,
stating that completion of the remaining agreements had been put on
hold while the master operating agreement concept was developed.
Mr. Saxton explained that completing the master operating agreement
would enable completion of the remaining agreements. Additionally,
only minor changes to the already completed agreements were needed in
order to fit into the framework of the master operating agreement.
Mr. Garzini recommended that the BPMC select an operator.
Mr. Garzini stated that approval was expected by the Attorney General's
office for a sole source contract, adding that prompt action was needed
by the utilities. Mr. Saxton stated that remaining agreement issues,
including the master operating agreement could be resolved in a one or
two day meeting of the Agreements Subcommittee.
Mr. Story stated HEA would have an O&M proposal ready to submit to
AEA and the Bradley PMC within two weeks. Noting that the
introduction of the proposed master operating agreement had delayed the
completion of the three remaining HEA agreements, and recognizing the
need to expedite the agreements process, Mr. Story moved that the PMC
authorize Ron Saxton and Stan Sieczkowski to complete the master
operating agreement. The motion, seconded by Mr. Ritchey, was
approved by unanimous roll call vote (Action 93-165).
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 7 of 9
Mr. Story moved that the BPMC direct AEA to work solely with Homer
Electric Association mplete i for site ion and
mainten: f the Bradle Hydroelectric Project, in accordance
with existing project agreements.'! Mr. Kelly asked if the issue of sole
source procurement of the Bradley Lake operation and maintenance
contract had been resolved. Mr. Garzini stated, because it was not a
typical procurement situation (i.e. the BPMC would actually be paying
for the contract), AEA could likely participate in a contract selected by
the BPMC. Mr. Garzini added that a formal legal opinion on the
procurement issue was requested by AEA. Related to the contracting
issue, Mr. Saxton stated that, according to the Power Sales Agreement,
the BPMC has the authority to chose the project operator and AEA has
the authority to veto the choice. Continuing, Mr. Saxton stated it was
his opinion that both AEA and the BPMC had authority to contract and
to veto the other's selection. Mr. Saxton added that the language of the
proposed master operating agreement allows the State to contract with
the operator and requires the approval of the BPMC. Mr. Kelly
recommended that the BPMC consider HEA's forthcoming proposal
while ABA obtained a legal opinion on State procurement requirements.
Mr. Garzini stated that, because of the State's responsibility to the FERC
license and bond requirements, AEA should be the contracting authority
and that the contract be subject to the approval of the BPMC.
Mr. Garzini requested that, if the BPMC develops a contract with an
operator, the FERC license, the bond holders and State's interests be
protected. Mr. Kelly strongly preferred the BPMC as the contractor,
acknowledging the need to maintain AEA's interest. Mr. Garzini later
offered an additional alternative, stating that AEA could contract with
the BPMC, which in turn, would contract with the project operator.
Mr. Story recognized AEA's obligations and its right to veto a contract
as well as its technical ability to assist with the development of an
operation and maintenance contract proposal. It is HEA's intent to work
with ABA to bring a two part proposal to the BPMC which would
identify the required services (Part 1) and the technical contract and
budget (Part 2). Mr. Story explained that HEA was in the process of
working with AEA and had not set up a structure to negotiate a contract
with the BPMC. The issue of which entity, the BPMC or ABA, would
ultimately be the contractor did not affect the development of the
operation and maintenance proposal. Mr. Story clarified the intent of
! Mr. Story's original motion did not contain the word solely. Mr. Story later added the word to clarify
the intent of the motion.
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1993
Page 8 of 9
his motion was for the BPMC to direct AEA to work solely with HEA to
complete HEA's contract proposal for the operation and maintenance of
Bradley Lake. The propriety of HEA's request for exclusive assistance
from AEA was questioned. In an effort to expedite the process of
completing HEA's operation and maintenance proposal, Mr. Kelly
mmen he motion be amen follows: The BPMC requ
AEA assist HEA with the ion of ion maintenan
proposal for presentation at the next Bradley PMC meeting. Both Mr.
Story and Mr. Ritchey accepted the amended motion. Prior to the vote,
Chairman Highers clarified that the motion was not intended to be
interpreted as exclusive. Mr. Garzini stated that AEA was available to
any BPMC member who requested help. The amended motion was
approved by unanimous roll call vote (Action 93-166).
12. NEW BUSINESS
A. Operations Budget Contingency Fund Resolution
Mr. Petrie reported that the Budget Subcommittee was working on a
resolution delegating authority to the Budget Subcommittee and expected
to have it ready by the next BPMC meeting.
Approval of FY94 Payment Obligation
The FY94 utility payment schedule and cash flow was distributed to the
Committee. Mr. Ritchey noted that the BPMC had previously acted
upon the FY94 budget, however had not approved the FY94 utility
payment schedule (Attachment 3). Mr. Ritchey advised the Committee
that the fund balance (Cash Flow, line 8) may actually be higher than
shown, in which case the utility payment amount could be reduced in the
future. AEA is reviewing the figures. Mr. Ritchey moved to approve
the FY94 utility payment schedule. Seconded by Mr. Kelly, the motion
was approved by unanimous roll call vote ( Action 93-167).
Approval of Other Payments
Mr. Kelly m rove payments of approximately $3,600 to Bill
Bennett for legal assistance associated with the Bradley Lake labor
negotiations and $6,215.90 to Ron Saxton for legal counsel. Seconded
Mr. Ritchey, the motion w: Vv. unanimous roll call vote
(Action 93-168).
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93a
BPMC Meeting if 8
June 17, 1993
Page 9 of 9
13. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Schedule Next Meeting
Thursday, July 22, 1993
10:00 a.m.
Chugach Electric Association
14. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 12:30 p.m.
David L. Highe:
y — nme Ges VCE tt —
Brent N. Petrie, Secretary
dburger\word\minutes\pmc\06-93