Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRural Power System Assessment, Summary of Results 2001/= ALASKA @i_ ENERGY AUTHORITY Rural Power System Assessment Summary of Results April 9, 2001 Prepared by Alaska Energy Authority Rural Power System Assessment Summary of Results Draft April 9. 2001 Prepared by Alaska Energy Authority Table of Contents FIELD ASSESSMENT OF UTILITY CONDITION AND O&M .......0.cccccccccceeeeeseeeececenentseeees 2 POWER COST EQUALIZATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT ............-.-00-00 3 DATA ANALYSIS boob obec eeeeeeeeeeeees bebbeeeeeeeeseseceueesessesssseeessstesssteessssee O PRE SU US arrests rece oe ve cenecaeecaccsncusnssevseescecessnencsseucuscsoeoovesesusevssccvavanvecsocseceucneretesesaa9 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1. SCOPE OF WORK FOR RURAL POWER SYSTEM ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 2. SAMPLE RURAL POWER SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REPORT: RUBY APPENDIX 3. RURAL POWER SYSTEM ASSESSMENT, SUMMARY OF RESULTS Introduction This report presents the results of work performed between September 2000 and February 2001 that assesses the physical condition and quality of operation, maintenance, and management (OM&M) of 169 rural utility facilities qualifying for the State of Alaska’s Power Cost Equalization (PCE) Program. The assessment is designed to provide input for prioritizing financial assistance to utilities for power system repairs and upgrades. Work was performed by staff and contractors of the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA). The Denali Commission and AEA provided funding support for the assessment. It should be noted that ratings of condition and OM&M reflect the situation current to the time of assessment. As power systems are modified and OM&M practices change these ratings may become less applicable. Methods Field Assessment of Utility Condition and O&M Most of the information in this publication was collected from field evaluations of power systems coordinated with AEA’s rural utility Circuit Rider Program. In July 2000 AEA released an Invitation to Bid (ITB) for the field evaluation and circuit rider services. Appendix 1 contains a scope of work for a sample contract, as well as forms required to be completed for the field assessment. The ITB requested separate bids for each of 11 regions (Table 1). Data to be collected included a descriptive assessment and numerical rating of the following: Condition of the powerhouse building (205 points maximum) Condition and installation of generator equipment (260 points maximum) Environmental conditions (180 points maximum) Condition of overhead and buried distribution systems (360 points maximum) Proficiency in reading meters, keeping daily logs, and maintaining equipment (80 points maximum) In addition, to the extent that it was available, AEA requested information on waste heat recovery systems and frequency, duration, and causes of power outages. Three firms submitted bids and were awarded contracts in September--Precision Power LLC, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Parsons Engineering LLC, and Igiugig Electric Utility. With AEA’s permission, Precision Power subcontracted with Kotzebue Electric for assessments in the Kotzebue area. Field assessments were completed for 169 facilities in 162 communities between September 22, 2000 to February 18. 2001. Due to weather problems, assessments have not been made yet in Little Diomede, Atka, and Nikolski. Contractors suomitted written reports and photographs for all sites visited (see Appendix 2 for a sample report done for Ruby Electric Utility, submitted by Precision Power.) Power Cost Equalization Program Management Assessment In December 2000, the Alaska Energy Authority's PCE Program staff conducted a review of how well PCE utilities complied with administrative requirements of the program. Through the review process, the following categories were assessed and included in the evaluation: Timely filing of annual reports with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska; Timely filing of PCE Utility Monthly Reports with the AEA; Completeness and accuracy of the PCE Utility Monthly Reports: Completeness and accuracy of the utility's customer ledgers submitted to AEA with the Utility Monthly Reports; 5. Response to AEA requests for information and documents. RWwWNM = Additionally, the Authority made note on whether or not the utility has experienced a high turn over of personnel, specifically utility clerks. Notation was also made on the amount of training the utility has received under the State Training and Employment Program (STEP), including Utility Clerk, Power Plant Operator and Bulk Fuel Tank Farm Operator training. Based on these considerations and overall staff experience with the utilities in areas of documentation and communication, a score of 1-5 (best to worst) was assigned for each utility. Data Analysis Field assessment and PCE management evaluation data was entered into a Microsoft Access database. Numerical scores were aggregated into two summary categories: 1. Power System Condition. This category includes field assessment scores for powerhouse, generator, distribution, and environmental conditions. Scores range from 0 (best condition) to 1005 (worst condition). 2. Operations, Maintenance, and PCE Management. This category includes field assessment scores for reading meters, keeping daily logs, and maintaining equipment (80 points maximum) in addition to PCE ratings scaled up by 5 (20 points maximum). Eleven of the utilities do not participate in the PCE program, and therefore could not be rated. In these cases PCE scores were computed based on percentile operations and maintenance scores from the field assessment adjusted to a maximum of 20. The overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Results Figure 1 plots condition score against OM&M score for each facility. Power system assessments are presented by facility and ranked from worst to best condition in Table 2 and by best to worst OM&M scores in Table 3. Appendix 3 provides a detailed breakdown of scores by community 3. Table 1. Communities receiving field assessment of utility condition and O&M by region and contractor. Region 1 Aleutian (Precision Power) Akutan Atka Cold Bay False Pass lvanof Bay King Cove Nelson Lagoon Nikolski Saint George Saint Paul Sand Point Region 2: Arctic Slope (ASRC Parsons) Anaktuvuk Pass Atqasuk Kaktovik Nuiqsut Point Hope Point Lay Wainwright Region 3: Bristol Bay (Precision Power) Chignik Chignik Lagoon Chignik Lake Clark's Point Egegik Ekwok Koliganek Levelock Manokotak Naknek/King Salmon New Stuyahok Perryville Pilot Point Port Heiden Togiak Twin Hills Region 4: Interior-East (Precision Power) Arctic Village Beaver Bettles/Evansville Birch Creek Central Chalkyitsik Circle Circle Hot Springs Eagle Fort Yukon Healy Lake Mentasta Lake Northway Rampart Stevens Village Tetlin Tok/Tanacross/Dot Lake Venetie Region 5: Interior-West (Precision Power) Allakaket/Alatna Anvik Galena Grayling Hughes Huslia Kaltag Koyukuk Lake Minchumina Manley Hot Springs McGrath Minto Nikolai Nulato Ruby Shageluk Takotna Tanana Telida Region 6: Kodiak (Igiugig Electric) Akhiok Karluk Larsen Bay Old Harbor Ouzinkie Region 7: Lower Kuskokwim (Precision Power) Akiachak Akiak Atmautluak Chefornak Eek Goodnews Bay Kasigluk/Nunapitchuk Kipnuk Kongiganak Kwethluk Kwigillingok Mekoryuk Napakiak Napaskiak Newtok Nightmute Platinum Quinhagak Toksook Bay Tuluksak Tuntutuliak Tununak Region 8a: Northwest (Kotzebue Electric, subcontractor to Precision Power) Ambler Brevig Mission Buckland Deering Diomede Gambell Kiana Kivalina Kobuk Noatak Savoonga Selawik Shungnak Wales Region 8b: Northwest (Precision Power) Elim Golovin Koyuk Noorvik Saint Michael Shaktoolik Shishmaref Stebbins Teller Unalakleet White Mountain Region 9: South-Central (Igiugig Electric) Chenega Bay Chitina Igiugig lliamna/Newhalen/ Nondalton Kokhanok Pedro Bay Port Alsworth Tatitlek Region 10: Southeast (Precision Power) Angoon Coffman Cove Elfin Cove Gustavus Haines Hollis Hoonah Hydaburg Kake Kasaan Klukwan Metlakatla Naukati Pelican Tenakee Springs Whale Pass Yakutat Region 11: Yukon-Kuspuk (Precision Power) Alakanuk Aniak Chevak Chuathbaluk Crooked Creek Emmonak Holy Cross Hooper Bay Kotlik Lime Village Lower Kalskag Marshall Mountain Village Pilot Station Pitka's Point Red Devil Russian Mission Saint Mary's Scammon Bay Sheldon Point Sleetmute Stony River Upper Kalskag OM&M Rating 120 100 80 60 40 20 Figure 1. Power system condition rating versus OM&M score for 169 facilities. o°¢ o°¢ ° € ° o ¢ ° o ° od e a ° ° ry ° > © e e Sd ° > . ° ° o ¢ 0 0 ¢ e oe ¢ oe eo o ee > + ° + o %e t t ’ ° OO 00g 000 0 ° % © > « o © woe om 4 ce $° oe o o ooo oe SOOO OO 4 06 OF Oe 400 000 6 oo ° +. 100 200 300 400 500 600 Condition Rating 700 Table 2. Rural power system assessment scores ranked by power system condition--worst to best. Power System Condition Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Rank Rank =Worst 1=Best Community Power Plant Total Points ( 169=Best ) Total Points ( 169=Worst ) Chitina Chitina Electric Inc 605 1 4 18 Koyukuk Koyukuk Electric Utility 555 2 68 152 Y Karluk Karluk Electric 485 3 100 169 Hughes Hughes Power & Light Company 475 4 78 155 Stony River Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative 420 5 78 155 Platinum Platinum Electric Utility 390 6 96 163 Golovin Golovin Power Utilities 380 7 56 145 Tuluksak Tuluksaf Traditional Council Power Utility 380 7 59 147 Newtok Ungusraq Power Company 355 9 44 121 Kwigillingok Kwig Power Company 350 10 62 149 Telida Telida Village Utility 340 11 100 169 Manokotak Manokotak Power Company 335 12 92 162 Arctic Village Arctic Village Electric Company 330 13 90 160 Crooked Creek Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative 325 14 48 138 Kongiganak Puvurnag Power Company 325 14 29 103 Napakiak Napakiak Ircinrag Power Company 315 16 92 162 Tuntutuliak Tuntutuliak Community Service Association 315 16 49 139 Shishmaref Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 300 18 18 59 Sleetmute Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative 300 18 58 146 Pedro Bay Pedro Bay Electric Utility 295 20 68 152 Deering Ipnatchiag Electric Company 290 21 42 116 Stevens Village Stevens Village Energy System 290 21 62.5 150 i Yakutat Yakutat Borough Electric Utility 285 Zo 4 18 Klukwan Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 280 24 4 18 Telida Telida Village Utility Plant 2 280 24 100 169 Point Lay North Slope Borough Power & Light 270 26 48 138 Chignik Chignik Bay Plant #2 265 27 47 123 Kokhanok ¢ Kokhanok Electric Utility 265 27 48 138 Larsen Bay Larsen Bay Utility Company 265 27 44 121 Igiugig Igiugig Electric Company 260 30 44 121 lvanof Bay Ivanof Bay Electric Utility 260 30 100 169 Nightmute Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 260 30 18 59 Chignik Chignik Bay Plant #1 255 33 47 123 Table 2 (cont.) Power System Condition Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Rank Rank / ( 1=Worst ) / 1=Best ) Community Power Plant Total Points 169=Best Total Points 169=Worst Teller Teller Power Company 235 34 28 101 Kotlik Kotlik Electric Service 225 35 29 103 Nikola: Nikolai Light & Power Utility 225 35 84 157 Port Heiden Port Heiden Electric Utility 225 35 100 169 Akiacnak Akiachak Ltd. Electric Utility 220 38 22 62 Atqasux North Slope Borough Power & Light 220 38 48 138 Mentasta Lake Alaska Power & Telephone 220 38 38 114 Kwetniuk Kuiggluum Kallugvia 215 41 27 80 Lake Minchumina Lake Minchumina Power Company 205 42 100 169 Wainwright North Slope Borough Power & Light 205 42 48 138 Centra: Central Power Company 200 44 44 121 Healy Lake Alaska Power & Telephone 200 44 23 73 Anvik Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 195 46 23 13 Atmautiuak Atmautluak Tribal Utilities 195 46 23 73 Point Hope North Slope Borough Power & Light 195 46 48 138 Gooanews Bay Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 190 49 28 101 Marsnai Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 185 50 18 59 Pelican Pelican Utility Company 185 50 25 77 Twin Hills Twin Hills Electric Utility 185 50 50 141 Fort Yukon Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company 180 53 23 73 Takotna Takotna Community Association Utilities 180 53 84 157 Brevia Mission Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 175 55 18 59 Eagle Eagle Power Company 175 55 8 39 Pilot Point Pilot Point Electric Utility 175 55: 18 59 Anaktuvuk Pass North Slope Borough Power & Light 170 58 48 138 Quinnagak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 170 58 33 108 Ruby Ruby Electric Utility 165 60 53 143 Mekoryuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 160 61 8 39 Buckiand Buckland Electric Utility 155 62 36 112 Napaskiak Napaskiak Electric Utility 155 62 34 109 Tununak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 155 62 8 39 Chefornak Naterkaq Light Plant 150 65 28 101 Elfin Cove Elfin Cove Electric Utility 150 65 24 75 Northway Northway Power & Light Company 150 65 23 73 Tatitlek Tatitlek Electric Utility 150 65 90 160 10 Table 2 (cont.) Community Beaver Kobuk Nunam iqua Saint Mary's Toksook Bay Wales Chuatnbaluk Ekwox Lower Kalskag Mourrain Village Saint George Akiak Eek Allakaxet Clark s Point Gustavus lliamna Noata« Ramoan Scammon Bay Hooper Bay Kivaiina Pilot Station Shaktoolik Galena Kiana McGratn Stepoins Tok White Mountain Ambier Chignik Lake Chistochina Coffman Cove Hydaourg Power Plant Beaver Joint Utilities Kobuk Valley Electric Cooperative Nunam Iqua Electric Inc Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Ekwok Electric Standby #2 Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Saint George Municipal Electric Utility Akiak Power Utilities Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Power & Telephone Clark's Point Electric Utility Gustavus Electric Company lliamna Power Plant Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Rampart Village Energy Systems Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Galena Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative McGrath Light and Power Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Power & Telephone White Mountain Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Chignik Lake Electric Utility Alaska Power & Telephone Coffman Cove Utilities Alaska Power & Telephone Power System Condition 11 Total Points 145 145 145 140 140 140 135 135 135 135 135 130 130 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 120 120 120 120 115 115 115 115 115 115 110 110 110 110 110 Rank 1=Worst 169=Best 69 69 69 72 72 v2 75 75 75 75 75 80 80 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 89 89 89 89 93 93 93 93 93 93 99 99 99 99 99 Total Points ( 16! 26 86 24 28 18 36 23 61 22 28 28 50 43 37.5 23 28 13 33 13 16 23 18 18 12 48 56 23 Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt 1=Best 9=Worst 78 158 75 101 39 39 59 112 73 39 148 62 101 101 141 18 39 117 113 73 101 48 108 48 49 73 59 39 59 46 138 145 73 18 39 Table 2 (cont.) Power System Condition Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Rank Rank ( 1=Worst ) / ( 1=Best ) Community Power Plant Total Points 169=Best Total Points 169=Worst Savoonga Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 110 99 28 101 Venetie Venetie 110 99 27 80 Angoon Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 105 106 4 18 Kaltag Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 105 106 28 101 Selawik Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 105 106 28 101 Togiak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 105 106 28 101 Kasigiuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 100 110 8 39 Nulato Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 100 110 28 101 Port Alsworth Tanalian Electric Cooperative 100 110 12 46 Russian Mission Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 100 110 28 101 Saint Paul Saint Paul Municipal Electric Utility 100 110 4 18 Whaie Pass Coffman Cove Utilities 100 110 4 18 Alakanuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 95 116 28 101 Bettles Alaska Power & Telephone 95 116 28 101 Emmonak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 95 116 18 59 Kipnuk Kipnuk Light Plant 95 116 8 39 Minto Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 95 116 48 138 Perryville Perryville Electric Utility 95 116 28 101 Red Devil Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative 95 116 18 59 Ekwok Ekwok Electric . 90 123 36 112 Gampell Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 90 123 8 39 Husiia Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 90 123 48 138 Kake Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 90 123 4 18 Nelson Lagoon Nelson Lagoon Electric Cooperative 90 123 74 153 Tetlin Alaska Power & Telephone 90 123 23 73 Unalakleet Unalakleet Valley Electric Cooperative 90 123 4 18 Birch Creek Birch Creek Village Electric Utility 85 130 18.75 60 Cold Bay G&K Inc 85 130 8 39 Haines Alaska Power & Telephone 85 130 8 39 Kasaan Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 85 130 4 18 Metiakatla Metlakatla Power & Light - Hydro 85 130 0 2 Metiakatla Metlakatla Power & Light - Standby 85 130 0 2 Sand Point Sand Point Electric Inc 85 130 52 142 Akutan Akutan - Plant 2 80 137 12 46 Chevak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 80 137 28 101 12 Table 2 (cont.) Power System Condition Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Rank Rank ( 1=Worst ) ( 1=Best ) Community Power Plant Total Points 169=Best Total Points 169=Worst Egegik Egegik Light & Power Company 80 137 8 39 Holy Cross Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 80 137 28 101 King Cove King Cove Electric Utility 80 137 12 46 Levelock Levelock Electric Cooperative Inc 80 137 32 105 Lime Village Lime Village Utility 80 137 32 105 Naknek Naknek Electric Association 80 137 8 39 Shageiuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 80 137 33 108 Tanana Tanana Power Company 80 137 4 18 Chalkyitsik Chalkyitsik Village Energy System 75 147 40 115 Kaktovik North Slope Borough Power & Light 75 147 48 138 Noorvik Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 75 147 8 39 Elim Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 70 150 48 138 Grayling Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 70 150 28 101 Hollis Alaska Power & Telepnone 70 150 8 39 Naukati Coffman Cove Utilities 70 150 4 18 New Stuyahok Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 70 150 28 101 Ouzinkie Ouzinkie Electric 70 150 48 138 Akutan Akutan - Plant 2 65 156 12 46 Chignik Lagoon Chignik Lagoon Power Utility 65 156 23 73 Hoonah Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 65 156 4 18 Shungnak Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 65 156 8 39 Aniak Aniak Light & Power Company 60 160 4 18 Pelican Pelican Hydro Plant 60 160 25 TL Saint Michael Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 60 160 8 39 Koliganek Koliganek Electric Utility 55 163 48 138 Nuiqsut North Slope Borough Power & Light 55 163 48 138 Chenega Bay Chenega Bay Electric Utility 50 165 12 46 Manley Hot Springs Manley Utility Company inc 40 166 28 101 Koyuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 30 167 8 39 Circle Hot Springs Distribution System 20 168 4 18 King Cove King Cove Electric Utility Hydro 0 169 12 46 13 Table 3. Rural power system assessment scores ranked by operation, maintenance, and PCE management scores--best to worst. Power System Condition Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Rank Rank 1=Worst 1=Best ) Community Power Plant Total Points 169=Best Total Points 169=Worst Metiaxatia Metlakatla Power & Light - Hydro 85 130 0 2 Metiaxatla Metlakatla Power & Light - Standby 85 130 0 2 Angeon Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 105 106 4 18 Aniax Aniak Light & Power Company 60 160 4 18 Chitina Chitina Electric Inc 605 1 4 18 Circle Hot Springs Distribution System 20 168 4 18 Coffman Cove Coffman Cove Utilities 110 99 4 18 Gustavus Gustavus Electric Company 125 82 4 18 Hooran Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 65 156 4 18 Kake Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 90 123 4 18 Kasean Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 85 130 4 18 Klukwan Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority 280 24 4 18 Nauxati Coffman Cove Utilities 70 150 4 18 Saint Paul Saint Paul Municipal Electric Utility 100 110 4 18 Tanana Tanana Power Company 80 137 4 18 Unaiaxieet Unalakleet Valley Electric Cooperative 90 123 4 18 Whae Pass Coffman Cove Utilities 100 110 4 18 Yakutat Yakutat Borough Electric Utility 285 23 4 18 Cola Bay G & K Inc. > 85 130 8 39 Eagie Eagle Power Company 175 55 8 39 Egeg.« Egegik Light & Power Company 80 137 8 39 Gamoell Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 90 123 8 39 Haines Alaska Power & Telephone 85 130 8 39 Hollis Alaska Power & Telephone 70 150 8 39 Hydaourg Alaska Power & Telephone 110 99 8 39 llamra lliamna Power Plant 125 82 8 39 Kasig.uk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 100 110 8 39 Kipne« Kipnuk Light Plant 95 116 8 39 Koyuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 30 167 8 39 Mekoryuk Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 160 61 8 39 Mourrain Village Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 135 is 8 39 Naknek Naknek Electric Association 80 137 8 39 Noorvix Alaska Village Electric Cooperative 75) 147 8 39 14 Table 3 (cont.) Community Saint Michael Shungnak Stebbins Toksook Bay Tununak Wales Akutan Akutan Chenega Bay King Cove King Cove Port Aisworth White Mountain Kivalina Shaktoolik Galena Brevig Mission Chuathbaluk Emmonak Marshall McGrath Nightmute Pilot Point Red Devil Shishmaref Tok Birch Creek Akiachak Akiak Anvik Atmautiuak Chignik Lagoon Chistocnina Fort Yukon Healy Lake Power Plant Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Akutan - Plant 2 Akutan - Plant 2 Chenega Bay Electric Utility King Cove Electric Utility Hydro King Cove Electric Utility Tanalian Electric Cooperative White Mountain Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Galena Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative McGrath Light and Power Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Pilot Point Electric Utility Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Power & Telephone Birch Creek Village Electric Utility Akiachak Ltd. Electric Utility Akiak Power Utilities Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Atmautluak Tribal Utilities Chignik Lagoon Power Utility Alaska Power & Telephone Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company Alaska Power & Telephone Power System Condition Total Points 15 60 65 115 140 155 140 65 80 50 80 100 115 120 120 115 175 135 95 185 115 260 175 95 300 115 85 220 130 195 195 65 110 180 200 Rank 1=Worst 169=Best 160 156 93 72 62 72 156 137 165 169 137 110 93 89 89 93 55 75 116 50 93 30 55 116 18 93 130 38 80 46 46 156 99 53 44 Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Total Points ( 8 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18.75 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 1=Best 169=Worst 39 39 39 39 39 39 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 48 48 49 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 60 62 62 73 73 73 73 73 73 Table 3 (cont.) Community Kiana Lower Kaiskag Northway Scammon Bay Tetlin Elfin Cove Nunam iqua Pelican Pelican Beaver Kwetniuk Veneue Alakanuk Allakaxet Bettles Chefornak Chevak Eek Gooanews Bay Grayling Holy Cross Hooper Bay Kaltag Manley Hot Springs New Stuyahok Nulato Perryville Russian Mission Saint Mary's Savoonga Selawik Teller Togiak Kongiganak Kotlik Power Plant Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Northway Power & Light Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Power & Telephone Elfin Cove Electric Utility Nunam Iqua Electric Inc Pelican Utility Company Pelican Hydro Plant Beaver Joint Utilities Kuiggluum Kallugvia Venetie Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Power & Telephone Alaska Power & Telephone Naterkag Light Plant Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Aiaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Manley Utility Company Inc. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Perryville Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Teller Power Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Puvurnaq Power Company Kotlik Electric Service Power System Condition Total Points 16 115 135 150 125 90 150 145 185 60 145 215 110 95 125 95 150 80 130 190 70 80 120 105 40 70 100 95 100 140 110 105 235 105 325 225 ( Rank 1=Worst 169=Best 93 75 65 82 123 65 69 50 160 69 41 99 116 82 116 65 137 80 49 150 137 89 106 166 150 110 116 110 72 99 106 34 106 14 35 Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Total Points ( 23 23 23 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 29 29 Rank 1=Best 169=Worst 73 73 73 73 73 75 75 77 77 78 80 80 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 103 103 ) Table 3 (cont.) Community Levelock Lime Village Pilot Station Quinnagak Shageluk Napaskiak Buckland Ekwok Ekwok Rampart Mentasta Lake Chalkyitsik Deering Noatak Central Igiugig Larsen Bay Newtok Chignik Chignik Ambier Anaktuvuk Pass Atqasuk Crooked Creek Elim Huslia Kaktovik Kokhanok Koliganek Minto Nuiqsut Ouzinkie Point Hope Point Lay Wainwright Power Plant Levelock Electric Cooperative Inc. Lime Village Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Napaskiak Electric Utility Buckland Electric Utility Ekwok Electric Ekwok Electric Standby #2 Rampart Village Energy Systems Alaska Power & Telephone Chalkyitsik Village Energy System Ipnatchiag Electric Company Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Central Power Company Igiugig Electric Company Larsen Bay Utility Company Ungusragq Power Company Chignik Bay Plant # 2 Chignik Bay Plant #1 , Alaska Village Electric Cooperative North Slope Borough Power & Light North Slope Borough Power & Light Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Alaska Village Electric Cooperative North Slope Borough Power & Light Kokhanok Electric Utility Koliganek Electric Utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative North Slope Borough Power & Light Ouzinkie Electric North Slope Borough Power & Light North Slope Borough Power & Light North Slope Borough Power & Light Power System Condition 17 Total Points 80 80 120 170 80 155 155 90 135 125 220 75 290 125 200 260 265 355 265 255 110 170 220 325 70 90 75 265 55 95 55 70 195 270 205 Rank 1=Worst 169=Best 137 137 89 58 137 62 62 123 75 82 38 147 21 82 30 27 27 33 99 58 38 14 150 123 147 27 163 116 163 150 46 26 42 Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Total Points ( 16 32 32 33 33 33 34 36 36 36 37.5 38 40 42 43 44 44 44 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 1=Best s=Worst 105 105 108 108 108 109 112 112 112 113 114 115 116 117 121 121 121 121 123 123 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 Table 3 (cont.) Power System Condition Oper, Maint, PCE Mgmt Rank Rank ( 1=Worst ) ( 1=Best ) Community Power Plant Total Points 169=Best Total Points 169=Worst TuntutuiaK Tuntutuliak Community Service Association 315 16 49 139 Clark s Point Clark's Point Electric Utility 125 82 50 141 Twin Huis Twin Hills Electric Utility 185 50 50 141 Sand Point Sand Point Electric Inc 85 130 52 142 Ruby Ruby Electric Utility 165 60 53 143 Chignix Lake Chignik Lake Electric Utility 110 99 56 145 Golovin Golovin Power Utilities 380 7 56 145 Sleetmute Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative 300 18 58 146 Tuluksa« Tuluksaf Traditional Council Power Utility 380 7 59 147 Saint George Municipal Electric Utility 135 75 61 148 Kwigiilincok Kwig Power Company 350 10 62 149 Stevens Village Energy System 290 21 62.5 150 Koyukuk Electric Utility 555 2 68 152 Pedro Bay Electric Utility 295 20 68 152 Nelson Lagoon Nelson Lagoon Electric Cooperative 90 123 74 153 Hughes Hughes Power & Light Company 475 4 78 155 Stony River Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative 420 5 78 155 Nikola Nikolai Light & Power Utility 225 35 84 157 Takotna Takotna Community Association Utilities 180 53 84 157 Kobuk Kobuk Valley Electric Cooperative 145 69 86 158 Arctic Vilage Arctic Village Electric Company 330 13 90 160 Tatitiek Tatitlek Electric Utility 150 65 90 160 Manokotak Manokotak Power Company 335 12 92 162 Napakiax Napakiak Ircinraq Power Company 315 16 92 162 Platinum Platinum Electric Utility 390 6 96 163 Ivanof Bay \vanof Bay Electric Utility 260 30 100 169 Karluk Karluk Electric 485 3 100 169 Lake Mincnumina Lake Minchumina Power Company 205 42 100 169 Port He:gen Port Heiden Electric Utility 225 35 100 169 Teliaa Telida Village Utility Plant 2 280 24 100 169 Telida Telida Village Utility 340 11 100 169 18 Appendices 11 Appendix 1. Scope of Work for Rural Power System Assessment 12 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY CONTRACT NO. VILLAGE POWER SYSTEM CIRCUIT RIDER, EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND ASSESSMENT SERVICES This Contract is entered into by and between the Alaska Energy Authority with offices in Anchorage, Alaska, ("the Authority), and (to be inserted by the Authority) with offices in (to be inserted by the Authority) ("Contractor"). WITNESSETH: For the consideration set forth below, the Authority and Contractor hereby agree as follows: SECTION | - STATEMENT OF WORK 1. Scope of Work The Contractor, in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the Authority, shall furnish all labor, tools, equipment, supervision, insurance, transportation, and incidentals, except as specified in writing to be provided by others and shall do all things necessary to perform circuit rider and emergency response services in accordance with work orders issued by the Authority, hereinafter "Work" as further described herein. All Work shall be performed in accordance with the terms, conditions and other requirements of this Contract. 2. General Information A. Purpose and Program Background The purpose of the Circuit Rider and Emergency Response Program is to assist village electric utilities in the routine operation and maintenance of their electrical systems. The Contractor shall provide services to groups or individual electric utilities in the region set forth in subparagraph B under this paragraph. The Rural Power System Upgrade (RPSU) program provides for capital improvements and technical assistance to rural electrical systems to eliminate safety hazards and enhance efficiency. Information from the power system assessment will be used for prioritizing RPSU activities. The Contractor shall make a minimum of one visit (or circuit rider trip) during the fall/winter to communities in the region set forth in subparagraph B. below whose electric utilities have requested such services from the Authority. The Authority will notify the Contractor of the requirements in the specific communities by issuing a properly completed Contract Work Order, ITB Attachment II. Work to be performed under this contract, shall be as set forth hereunder in Section |, Paragraph 3, Description of Work. Circuit Rider and Emergency Response/Repair Contract Regions The Contractor shall provide circuit rider and emergency response/repair services for region (s) awarded. General Requirements (1.) | Scheduling Requirements (a) Initial Power Plant Assessment/Circuit Rider Visit: Upon receipt of the executed contract and initial work order (based on the bidders lump sum price bid), the Contractor shall contact the communities within the specified region to schedule the visits in advance to ensure that the power plant operator and/or utility manager will be available when the contractor arrives. The Contractor shall provide the Authority a work schedule within one month of contract/initial work order execution. (b) Additional Circuit Rider Visits: Upon receipt of a work order for a specified village utility, the Contractor shall contact the community to schedule a circuit rider visit in advance to ensure that the power plant operator and/or utility manager will be available when the Contractor arrives. The Contractor shall begin the Work within two weeks of the date a work order is issued. (c) Emergency Response Visits: Contractors will be expected to schedule emergency response visits as soon as reasonably possible after a work order is issued. If a Contractor for a particular region is unable to respond in (4.) (5.) what is deemed by the Authority to be a reasonable length of time, the Authority may cancel the work order and make alternative arrangements to provide emergency response services. (d) Minor Repairs: The Contractor will generally be expected to schedule minor repairs in conjunction with circuit rider visits. If repairs cannot be made during circuit rider visits due to unavailability of parts or supplies the Contractor will notify the Authority, and the Authority will determine if a second trip to the community is required. Work Orders All Work hereunder shall be authorized through the issuance of work orders. Payment for Work performed by the Contractor will be made to the Contractor only if the such Work was authorized in advance by the Authority through the issuance of a work order. Emergency Response Emergency response activities cannot be clearly identified in advance. In general, emergency work performed under this contract will only include measures that will restore power quickly, and will not include reconstruction of equipment or facilities. Major Repairs No major repair work will be performed under this contract. A major repair is defined as Work outside of normal circuit rider activities that exceeds $5,000 in parts and labor costs. If state funding is requested by the village utility for major repairs and this funding request is approved by the Authority, resulting work will be the subject of a separate, competitive procurement. Responsibility for the Cost of Parts and Supplies The cost of parts and supplies needed to perform routine maintenance activities will be borne by the village electric utilities. It is, however, the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate with the village utility on availability and/or delivery schedules of parts and supplies prior to making visits. (6.) If the Contractor determines that a part is required to make a minor repair and the village is financially unable to pay for the part, it may be billed to the Authority with the Authority’s prior approval. Prohibition against Performing Program Activities on Facilities owned by the Contractor Village electric utility systems owned and/or operated by the Contractor are not eligible to receive services under this contract. Prohibition against Sale of Equipment, Parts, and Services to Participating Village Utilities Under no circumstances will the Contractor be allowed to sell equipment, parts, and/or its services to participating village utilities while on State business. 3. Description of Work A. Circuit Rider Program Services Upon receipt of a work order to perform circuit rider services in a particular community, the Contractor shall perform the following services on site and in cooperation with the village power plant operator and/or other personnel: (1.) (3.) The Contractor shall instruct the utility's power plant operator in recording operating data on system performance using the forms in Contract Attachment |. These forms shall remain on-site for use by the utility. The Contractor shall determine utility personnel's proficiency in meter reading, ability to perform minor maintenance tasks, and personnel's ability to complete other routine requirements of a good preventive maintenance program (the above may not be necessary if the Contractor has previously provided services to that particular utility). The Contractor shall provide training to utility personnel during the visits as the Contractor deems necessary to bring the village utility's procedures in conformance with standard utility practices; The Contractor shall review power house operations, utility plant conditions, and the utility's system maintenance procedures. As necessary, the Contractor shall make recommendations on (4.) (5.) (6.) modifying these procedures to conform to standard electric utility practices; The Contractor shall supervise and instruct village utility personnel in performing routine maintenance activities and minor repairs; and During the visit, before departing the community, the Contractor shall meet with the plant operator, the Utility Manager or other person designated by the community. At this meeting, the Contractor shall inform the community of any system operating problems and required corrective measures, any parts required for minor repairs, any modifications needed to the utility's preventive maintenance procedures, and answer the community's questions, etc. After completing circuit rider services under a work order and upon return to the Contractor's home base, the Contractor shall prepare and provide to the Authority a brief, written report describing the activities that took place during the visit. At a minimum, the report shall include copies of field notes for each community relating to the following topics, as well as a regional summary of the activities undertaken during that visit, including a listing of which communities have Life, Health, Safety issues, preventive maintenance procedures problems, unbalanced loads, etc.: (a.) physical plant: comments on the general condition of the utility's physical plant at the time of the visit and any recommendations made by the Contractor to village utility personnel to change these conditions, (b.) plant operations and maintenance: comments on the Contractor's initial review of the village utility's plant operating and maintenance procedures, including any Contractor recommendations made to utility personnel to modify these procedures. Comments on utility personnel's level of proficiency in meter reading and performing routine maintenance procedures. A description of any preventative maintenance items completed or minor repair work supervised on the circuit rider visit, (c.) identification of major repair needs: identification, description and estimated cost of any equipment needing major repairs, (d.) forms: comments on the Contractor's review of forms completed by the power plant operator (Contract Attachment I). (7.) Upon request from the community that minor distribution line maintenance is required, such as load balancing, service drop repairs, etc., the Contractor shall, on their scheduled trip, have a lineman available for such minor repairs. B. Emergency Response Activities Emergency response for village electric utilities will be performed on an "as requested" basis under the terms and conditions of Authority work orders that are issued before work is initiated. Work orders for emergency response will be distinct from work orders for circuit rider services. Work orders for emergency response will be initiated under the following circumstances: a. If the village utility contacts the Authority directly with an emergency response request, the Authority will issue a work order to the Contractor for a particular region. Before the work order is issued, a cost estimate for the emergency response will be established based on the conditions of the emergency. b. lf, the village utility contacts the Contractor with an emergency response request the Contractor will notify the Authority and seek written authorization to respond through a work order. The work order will establish estimated costs and set limits for the response. Facsimile documents will be accepted as original documents in all matters related to emergency response; Cc If during the course of a circuit rider visit, the Contractor identifies minor repairs that need to be completed to keep the village utility's system functioning properly, but these repairs are beyond the scope of the visit the Contractor will notify the Authority and seek approval of a written work order to cover costs and spending limits associated with the minor repair work; and d. If an emergency condition in the village requires an immediate response and the Contractor for that region is unable to respond in a timely fashion, the Authority reserves the right to make alternative arrangements for handling the response. c. Power System Assessment Upon receipt of a work order to perform power system assessments, the Contractor will visit the candidate community to gather and record information regarding the powerhouse, generation equipment, distribution system, life/health/safety issues, waste heat, and outages specified on Attachments II. The Contractor will provide the information, photographs of system components, and any supporting field notes to the Authority for each community in the form of a neatly bound document. After completing power system assessment services under a work order and upon return to the Contractor's home base, the Contractor shall prepare and provide to the Authority a brief, written report describing the activities that took place during the visit. At a minimum, the report shall include copies of field notes for each community relating to the following topics, as well as a regional summary of the activities undertaken during the visit. Physical plant: comments on the general condition of the utility's physical plant at the time of the visit and any recommendations made by the Contractor to village utility personnel to change these conditions. Contract Term This Contract shall be effective upon signature by the Contractor and the Authority, and shall expire June 30, 2001. Assessment reports will be due by November 30, 2000. Contractor Personnel Contractor personnel shall be fit for and skilled in the Work or classification to which they are assigned. Contractor Equipment and Facilities Contractor shall provide and use only such equipment as is capable of safely, efficiently and satisfactorily accomplishing the Work. Inspection and Acceptance The Authority shall have the right of access to and inspection of the Work and Contractor's facilities at all reasonable times during the Contract term, and Contractor shall provide proper facilities for such access and inspection by the Authority. Inspection by the Authority shall not be deemed to indicate acceptance of any Work. Deliverable items shall conform to Contract requirements. Final inspection and acceptance shall be made by the Authority Representative. 8. Site Inspection Before starting Work, the Contractor shall make a thorough inspection of the Work site and its surroundings so that it may be familiar with all conditions relative to the Work, including, but not limited to, structures, equipment, water, excavated material, and fill 9. Safety Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to maintain the Work site free from hazards likely to cause injury, illness or death to persons or damage to property. All accidents or occurrences resulting in injuries to Contractor's employees or third parties, including all OSHA-recordable injuries and illness, shall be verbally reported by Contractor to the Authority's site representative within four (4) hours of occurrence and reported in writing by Contractor to the Authority within 24 hours of each occurrence. 10. Safe Work Area The Authority reserves the right to suspend Work if, in the Authority's opinion, it is not safe for Work to continue. Such suspension shall remain in effect until the Authority deems that it is safe to resume Work. Contractor shall not have any claim against the Authority for compensation for lost time or productivity due to a suspension of Work for safety reasons 11. Defective or Non-Conforming Workmanship If any Work is determined to be defective or not in conformance with the Contract, the Contractor will be notified in writing and shall, at Contractor's expense, immediately remove and replace or correct such defective Work. Failure of the Authority to discover defective design, materials or workmanship shall not relieve Contractor of its obligations under this Contract nor prejudice the rights of the Authority thereafter to reject or require the correction of defective work in accordance with the provisions of this Contract. 12. Applicable Regulations and Law The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in performance of the work, including: Compliance with Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled “Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41CFR chapter 60). 13. 14 15. Compliance with the Copeland ~‘Anti-Kickback" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3). Compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). “Buy American” provision: “In accordance with section 215 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. And implementing EPA regulations, the contractor agrees that preference will be given to domestic construction materials by the contractor, subcontractors, materialmen and suppliers in the performance of this subagreement. (Contractors must use domestic construction materials in preference to non-domestic material if it is priced no more than 6 percent higher than the bid or offered price of the non-domestic material.) Environmental Monitoring The Contractor shall monitor its Work to prevent environmental degradation. Each Contractor and subcontractor employee shall be trained concerning environmental requirements and regulations. Environmental monitoring of the actual Work shall be done by both the Contractor and the Authority. Should methods or practices be noted as the Work progresses which result in detrimental environmental effects. the Contractor shall change its methods and take any necessary corrective action as approved or directed by the Authority. Protection of Environment Contractor shall take all necessary steps to comply with State of Alaska regulations protecting the environment. Contractor shall not perform any operations outside of designated work area without obtaining specific written authorization from the Authority. Contractor shall be responsible for environmental damage resulting from its operations including cost of repairs or restoration to the satisfaction of the Authority and/or other governmental authorities. Cleaning Up Contractor shall keep the Work site free at all times from accumulation of material or rubbish resulting from Work, and upon completion of Work shall thoroughly clean the premises and remove all rubbish and waste to the satisfaction of the Authority. Initiation of cleanup by Contractor shall not, in itself, constitute an admission or assumption of liability by Contractor 16. Authority Representative For this Contract, the Authority Representative is Kris Noonan, telephone: 907- 269-4697 17. Contractor Representative For this Contract, the Contractor Representative is (to be inserted by the Authority) telephone: _(to be inserted by the Authority) VILLAGE POWER SYSTEM CIRCUIT RIDER, EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND ASSESSMENT SERVICES CONTRACT ATTACHMENT NO. II RURAL UTILITY POWER HOUSE INVENTORY, UTILITY PROBLEM REPORT AND ELECTRICAL UTILITY EVALUATION FORMS STATE OF ALASKA Alaska Energy Authority 333 West 4th Avenue, Suite 301 Anchorage, Alaska 99501-2341 Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-1 Contract No. ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY RURAL UTILITY POWERHOUSE INVENTORY COMMUNITY UTILITY OWNERSHIP CONTACT DATE PHONE G-1 G-2 G-3 ENGINE MAKE ENGINE MODEL ENGINE RPM SERIAL NUMBER GOVERNOR TYPE MODEL ACTUATOR MODEL SPEED CONTROL DC VOLTAGE UNIT CIRCUIT BREAKER TYPE AMP/VOLT CURRENT HOURS GENERATOR MAKE GENERATOR MODEL # GENERATOR SERIAL # GENERATOR CAPACITY (kW) GENERATOR VOLTAGE VOLTAGE REGULATOR, MAKE & MODEL PARALLEL SWITCH GEAR OEM kWh METER(Yes or No) POWERHOUSE kWh METER TYPE CATALOG # or TYPE DEMAND ? CT RATIO STATION SERVICE METER (Yes or No) STATION SERVICE METER TYPE CATALOG # or TYPE BATTERY CHARGER/TYPE/MODEL FUEL DAY TANK TYPE PUMP # MOTOR # FUEL DAY TANK METER WASTE HEAT RECOVERY OPERATIONAL WASTE HEAT METER FIRE PROTECTION TYPE/OPERATIONAL? ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-2 Contract No. ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY CIRCUIT RIDER PROGRAM UTILITY PROBLEM REPORT Utility Name: Date: Region Number: Technician: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF VISIT: PROFICIENCY Meter Reading: Acceptable Needs Work Daily Logs: Acceptable Needs Work Maintenance: Acceptable Needs Work Routine Maintenance: Acceptable Needs Work TRAINING PERFORMED Training Given To: ROUTINE MAINTANCE PERFORMED GENERAL CONDITIONS OF Powerhouse: Electrical Distribution System: Contract Attachment No. Ill U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-3 Contract No. HEATH AND SAFTY ISSUES: OTHER REPAIRS NEEDED: Contract Attachment No. Ill U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-4 Contract No. ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY Electrical Utility Evaluation Form Community: Evaluation Date: Evaluator: Powerhouse Building (Circle or highlight the appropriate points.) Site Location Site suitable for powerhouse 0 points < 100 feet from a public well 10 points < 25 feet from an eroding bank or beach, or in a flood plain 10 points 20 points max. Foundation “Powerhouse on acceptable foundation (pad & post, piling, concrete, etc.) 0 points “Powerhouse directly on gravel pad or light timbers (raised small timbers, on permeable gravel) 5 points “Powerhouse directly on tundra or natural soils (no foundation) 10 points Powerhouse leaning considerably or unstable foundations (seismic hazard) 20 points 30 points max. Flooring *Welded steel deck plate or concrete (sealed) 0 points *Steel deck plate or concrete (unsealed) 5 points “Wood (sealed or painted) , 10 points *Wood (non-sealed or bare) 20 points 20 points max. Interior Walls “Concrete or metal skin 0 points “Fiberglass reinforced paneling (FRP) 5 points *Gypsum board 5 points Wood (painted or sealed) 10 points Wood (non-painted or bare) 20 points 35 points max. Exterior Walls *Concrete or metal siding 0 points “Wood (painted or sealed) 5 points “Wood (non-painted or bare) 20 points 20 points max. Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-5 Contract No. Roof Penetration *None 0 points “Properly installed (rain tight) *Minor leaks (repairable) *Major leaks (not repairable) Ventilation *Proper ventilation (air intake & exhaust fans, louvers & hoods) “Adequate ventilation (air intake & exhaust fans) *Minimum ventilation (air intake) *No ventilation (doors or windows have to be left open) Lighting *Excellent lighting “Adequate lighting “Poor lighting *No lighting Security Powerhouse fenced in & door locks Door locks No fence No door locks Generator Equipment and Installation Diesel Engine < 5,000 hours of operation, (number & kW of units ) > 10,000 hours of operation, (number & kW of units ) > 20,000 hours of operation, (number & kW of units ) > 30,000 hours of operation, (number & kW of units ) Generator Condition Excellent, like new in appearance, (number & kW of units ) Good, (number & kW of units ) Poor, guards & covers missing, (number & kW of units ) Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-6 5 points 10 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 5 points 10 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 5 points 10 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 5 points 5 points 10 points 20 points total 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points 60 points max. 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points max. Contract No. Load Sizing Properly sized generation to meet the community loads Undersized generation to meet the community loads Oversized generation to meet the community loads Control Switchgear *Fully automatic synchronizing switchgear *Semi-automatic synchronizing switchgear *Manually synchronizing switchgear *Manual transfer switches *Manual mounted breakers Electrical “Wiring appears appropriate “Exposed wiring, improper grounding, missing covers etc. Fuel System Inside Powerhouse “Welded piping “Threaded piping “Welded & threaded piping Rubber hose No daytank Additional for active leaks Totalizing & Station Service Meter “Properly installed and working totalizing & station service meter No totalizing meter No station service meter Fuel Meter “Properly installed & working fuel meter *No fuel meter Environmental Interior of Powerhouse Clean, well kept Old generator part stored inside facility Waste oil stored inside facility Apparent oil spills Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-7 0 points 10 points 10 points 20 points max. 0 points 5 points 10 points 20 points 30 points 30 points max. 0 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 10 points 5 points 10 points 20 points 20 points 60 points max. 0 points 10 points 10 points 20 points max. 0 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 10 points 10 points 20 points 40 points max. Contract No. Under Facility Clean. well kept Old generator part stored under facility Waste oil stored under facility Apparent oil spills Surrounding of Powerhouse Clean, well kept Old generator part stored on site Waste oil stored on site Apparent oil spills Waste Oil Disposal “Waste oil blending system “Waste oil incinerator “Drum or tank storage for waste oils Life. Health, & Safety *Code Compliant *Low risk *Medium risk *High risk “Potential for loss of life *Indicates that only one of the group should be chosen. Electrical Distribution Line Evaluation TOTAL Overhead Distribution System Pole type Fully treated poles Butt treated poles Native pole (trees) Pole installation 0 points 10 points 10 points 20 points 40 points max. 0 points 10 points 10 points 20 points 40 points max. 0 points 5 points 20 points 20 points max 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points 40 points 40 points max. 645 points max. 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points max. Proper depth (can be determined by the manufacture’s mark or button on pole) 0 points Within 12 inches of recommended depth Within 24 inches of recommended depth Greater than 24 inches of recommended depth Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-8 10 points 20 points 30 points 60 points max. Contract No. Pole alignment Poles straight Poles leaning less than 10° Poles leaning greater than 10° Distribution voltage =>7200 volts 2400 volts 480/277 volts 208/120 volts Anchors Properly installed (<12 inches of the anchor rod exposed) 12 - 24 inches of the anchor rod exposed >24 inches of the anchor rod exposed 3 Primary conductor Appears properly installed (sag, conductor size, etc) Improperly installed (conductor needs resagging, etc) Service conductor Appears properly installed (sag, conductor size, etc) Improperly installed (conductor needs resagging, etc) Meter installation Appears to be properly installed (height, grounding, etc) Improperly installed (height, no ground, etc) Meter Condition Residential & Commercial Good (appears in good condition) Fair (minor corrosion) Poor (major corrosion, needs replacing) Over all condition of the system “Excellent (no repairs needed) “Good (minor repairs, resag guys, resag service drops, etc) 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points max. 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points 40 points max. 0 points 10 points 20 points 0 points max. 0 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 10 points 10 points max. 0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points max. 0 points 10 points “Poor (major repairs needed, pole, guy, conductor, meter replacement, etc) 30 points Contract Attachment No. Ill U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-9 30 points max. Contract No Underground Distribution System Primary conductor “Appears to be properly installed 0 points “Exposed conductor 20 points 20 points max. Transformers “Appears to be properly installed 0 points *Improperly installed (no pad, leaning, etc) 20 points 20 points max. Service conductor “Appears to be properly installed 0 points “Exposed conductor 20 points 20 points max. “Indicates that only one of the group should be chosen. TOTAL 360 points max. General Questions Use separate sheet(s) to answer these questions. 1. \f records are available, indicate the number, duration, and causes of all forced outages during the last 12 months. If records are not available, provide whatever reasonable estimates available from utility personnel regarding outages number, duration, and causes. 2. |f waste heat from power generation is currently recovered, list the facilities to which waste heat is provided, and if known, the gallons of heating fuel displaced per year. 3. If additional waste heat is assumed available, describe the potential users of the waste heat and the gallons of fuel oil that could be displaced annually. Contract Attachment No. III U:Mjudd/ITB/Inhouse/2000/2000Q3/CircuitRider/ITB A-10 Contract No. Appendix 2. Sample Rural Power System Assessment Report: Ruby 13 ZX Precision Power LLc LGR 2 2 A Division of Peak Oilfield Service Company FIELD TRIP REPORT CIRCUIT RIDER PROGRAM REGION 5 — - INTERIOR- WEST RUBY Circuit Rider and Emergency Response Services DOE-01-R-001 FIELD TRIP REPORT RUBY - CRM 2009 Date: October 12, 2000 The purpose of the trip was to: e Inspect the utility's power generation and electrical distribution systems. « Evaluate power plant personnel and provide training, as needed. « Perform minor maintenance and repairs. The utility contact for the CRM was Dale Honea. Power Plant The powerhouse is a wood building on a concrete pad foundation. There are 3 diesel generator sets rated 300 kW, 225 kW and 155 kW respectively. The switchgear provides manual synchronizing. Two units are operational # 3 is not operational. Current meter readings of engine hours are #1 — No Meter, #2 — No Meter and #3 — No Meter. A waste heat recovery system is not installed. The upkeep of the power plant appears to be marginally adequate. There is not a formal training program in place. Electrical Distribution System The 7200 volts overhead electrical distribution system is generally in good condition. Service Repairs Recommended 4 1. Correct all safety hazards 2. Electrical covers that are missing need replacement Recommended Improvements_- Major Projects 1. Upgrades to ventilation and fire protection systems Electrical Utility Evaluation - Score Summary: Powerhouse Building 65 points Generator Equipment & Installation 30 points Environmental 30 points Electrical Distribution 40 points RUBY REAR VIEW OF POWERHOUSE INSIDE OF POWERHOUSE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SWITCHGEAR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY RURAL UTILITY POWERHOUSE INVENTORY COMMUNITY _Ruby UTILITY Ruby Electric Utility OWNERSHIP City of Ruby CONTACT Dale Honea DATE 10/12/00 PHONE (907) 468-4416 G-1 G-2 G-3 ENGINE MAKE Caterpillar _| Caterpillar | Caterpillar ENGINE MODEL | 3406 DI 3306 3306 PC ENGINE RPM 1800 1800 SERLAL NUMBER 2WB03423 9NRO0581 66D42003 GOVERNOR TYPE Woodward: Electric/Hyd Woodward: Electric/Hyd Woodward: Electric/Hyd MODEL ACTUATOR 8561-461 8561-461 8561-461 MODEL SPEED CONTROL 5484-735 5484-735 CAT 7W2743 DC VOLTAGE 24V 24V 24V UNTT CIRCUIT BREAKER General Electric General Electric General Electric TYPE AMP/VOLT CAT TJJ436400 CAT TJK436F00 CAT TJK436F000 400A/600V | 400A/600V 400A/600V —— CURRENT HOURS No Meter | No Meter No Meter GENERATOR MAKE Caterpillar Caterpiliar Caterpiliar GENERATOR MODEL = GENERATOR SERIAL = GENERATOR CAPACITY (kW) GENERATOR VOLTAGE VOLTAGE REGULATOR. MAKE & MODEL PARALLEL SWITCH GEAR DISTRIBLTION VOLTAGE OEM kWh METER(Yes or No) POWERHOUSE kWh METER TYPE Rotating Disk Dial Face Type CATALOG # or TYPE Type KSLS Sangamo DEMAND ? No CT RATIO 500:S STATION SERVICE METER (Yes or No) STATION SERVICE METER TYPE CATALOG # or TYPE BATTERY CHARGER TYPE/MODEL None FUEL DAY TANK TYPE Greer Tank 300 Galion Capacity PUMP = Haight 8910 SS MOTOR # Leeson C6C17FK3B FUEL DAY TANK METER WASTE HEAT RECOVERY OPERATIONAL WASTE HEAT METER FIRE PROTECTION TYPE/OPERATIONAL? ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY CIRCUIT RIDER PROGRAM UTILITY PROBLEM REPORT Utility Name: Ruby Electric Utility Date: 19/12/00 Region Number: 5 Technician: A. Flores BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF VISIT: Evaluating Ruby Electric Power Plant and distribution system. OPERATOR PROFICIENCY: (Circle One) Meter Reading: 0 = Excellent = Good 10=Acceptable 20 = Unacceptable Observation: Records kept in City Office and current. Daily Logs: 0=Excellent 5=Good 10=Acceptable (20:= Unacceptable) Observation: No logs were being kept. Routine Maintenance: 0=Excellent 5=Good 4108= Acceptable} 20 = Unacceptable Observation: Plant is cleaned once a day. Scheduled Maintenance: 0=Excellent 5=Good 4@=Acceptable) 20 = Unacceptable Observation: Oil and filter were changed every 10 days, but no written records were kept. GENERAL COMMENTS: | The operator needs to improve his documentation of maintenance. Training was given to him in | regards to this. NOTES Routine Maintenance (filter changes, oil changes, replace belts, etc.) Scheauled Maintenance (valve adjustment, water pump replacement, injector replacement, etc.) MAINTENANCE PLANNING Do you have a written preventive maintenance plan? ___ Yes; X No. If there is a plan, do you follow it closely? ____ Yes;__ No. If you have a maintenance plan but do not follow it closely, what problems prevent you from doing so? | No written preventative maintenance plan in writing or followed, except for oil changes and [ major repairs. TRAINING PERFORMED | Gave training in the use of daily logs and maintenance schedules. Recommended that they install hour meters for record keeping. TRAINING GIVEN TO: Dale Honea ROUTINE MAINTANCE PERFORMED Oil and filter changes. No documentation of daily maintenance. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF POWERHOUSE: | Plant is in fair condition, but needs improvement in its ventilation and fire protection systems. Should have drywall on generator side of plant. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: Electrical distribution system is in good shape and any corrections are being performed by contractors. HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES: Exposed wiring on circuit breaker panel (secondary) and electrical light switches. No fire extinguishers. OTHER REPAIRS NEEDED: Holes in roof need to be patched. Louvers for engines manually operated; no plenum work to keep cold air out of plant. ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY Electrical Utility Evaluation Form Community: Ruby Evaluation Date: 10/12/00 Evaluator: A. Flores Powerhouse Building (Circle or highlight the appropriate points.) Site Location Site suitable for powerhouse < 100 feet from a public well < 25 feet from an eroding bank or beach, or in a flood plain Foundation *Powernouse on acceptable foundation (pad & post. piling, concrete, etc.) *Powemouse directly on gravel pad or light timbers (raised small timbers, on permeable gravel) “Powerhouse directly on tundra or natural soils (no foundation) Powerhouse leaning considerably or unstable foundations (seismic hazard) Flooring “Welded steel deck plate or concrete (sealed) “Steel deck plate or concrete (unsealed) “Wood (sealed or painted) “Wood (non-sealed or bare) Interior Walls “Concrete or metal skin “Fiberglass reinforced paneling (FRP) *Gypsum board Wood (painted or sealed) Wood (non-painted or bare) Exterior Walls “Concrete or metal siding “Wood (painted or sealed) “Wood (non-painted or bare) poin 10 points 10 points 20 points max. 0 points, 5 points 10 points 20 points 30 points max. 0 points 10 points 20 points 20 points max. 0 points 5 points “poin (10. poin 20 points 35 points max. 0 points points) 20 points 20 points max. Roof Penetration *None 0 points *Propeny installed (rain tight) 5 points *Minor leaks (repairable) 0, *Major leaks (not repairable) 20 points max. Ventilation *Proper ventilation (air intake & exhaust fans, louvers & hoods) 0 points *Adequate ventilation (air intake & exhaust fans) 5 points *Minimum ventilation (air intake) 10: points *No ventilation (doors or windows have to be left open) 20 points 20 points max. Lighting “Excellent lighting 0 points *Adeauate lighting 5 points “Poor iighting fie oints| *No lighting 20 points 20 points max. Security Powemouse fenced in & door locks 0 points Door locks '5-points No fence '5:point: No door locks 10 points 20 points total Generator Equipment and Installation Diesei Engine Unit #1 Unit #2 Unit #3 Unit #4 kW 300 kW 22 kW 155 kW Hours of Operation No Meter No Meter No Meter Diesel Engine < 10,000 hours of operation 0 points > 10,000 hours of operation 10 points > 20,000 hours of operation 20 points > 30,000 hours of operation 30 points 60 points max. Generator Condition Unit #1 Unit #2 Unit #3 Unit #4 Good, like new xX X X Fair Poor, guards/covers missing Good, like new in appearance 3X O:points) Fair 10 points Poor, guards & covers missing 20 points 30 points max. Load Sizing Properly sized generation to meet the community loads 0-points| Undersized generation to meet the community loads 10 points Oversized generation to meet the community loads 10 points 20 points max. Control Switchgear “Fully automatic synchronizing switchgear 0 points *Semi-automatic synchronizing switchgear 5 points *Manually synchronizing switchgear 10 points| *Manual transfer switches 20 points *Manual mounted breakers 30 points 30 points max. Electrical *Wiring appears appropriate 0:points| *Exposed wiring, improper grounding, missing.covers etc. 20 points 20 points max. Fuel System Inside Powerhouse i “Welded piping 0 points *Threaded piping ie paints “Welded & threaded piping 5 points Rubber hose 10 points No daytank 20 points Additional for active leaks 20 points 60 points max. Totalizing & Station Service Meter *Properly installed and working totalizing & station service meter 0 points No totalizing meter 10 points No station service meter 20 points max. Fuel Meter *Properly installed & working fuel meter *No fuel meter Interior of Powerhouse Clean, weil kept Old generator part stored inside facility Waste oil stored inside facility Apparent oil spills Under Facility Clean. weil kept Old generator part stored under facility Waste oil stored under facility Apparent oil spills Surrounding of Powerhouse Clean. well kept Old generator part stored on site Waste oil stored on site Apparent oil spills Waste Oil Disposal “Waste oil blending system “Waste oil incinerator *Drum or tank storage for waste oils Life. Health, & Safety *Code Compliant *Low risk *Medium risk *High risk *Potential for loss of life Environmental *Indicates that only one of the group should be chosen. TOTAL 645 points max. 20 points 20 points max. 10 points 10 points 20 points 40 points max. 0 points| 10 points 10 points 20 points 40 points max. O:points 10 points 10 points 20 points 40 points max. 0 points 5 points 20 points max 0 points Fapointa ~ 20 points 30 points 40 points 40 points max. Electrical Distribution Line Evaluation Overhead Distribution System Pole type Fully treated poles join Butt treated poles 10 points Native poie (trees) 20 points 30 points max. Pole installation Proper depth (can be determined by the manufacture’s mark or button on pole) Q'points) Within 12 inches of recommended depth 10 points Within 24 inches of recommended depth 20 points Greater than 24 inches of recommended depth 30 points 60 points max. Pole aiianment Poles straight 0 points) Poles ieaning less than 10° (10 points) Poles ieaning greater than 10° 20 points 30 points max. Distribution voltage =>7200 volts 0 points 2400 volts 10 points 480/277 volts 20-points| 208/120 volts 30 points 40 points max. Anchors = Propeny installed (<12 inches of the anchor rod exposed) 0.:points| 12 - 24 inches of the anchor rod exposed 10 points >24 inches of the anchor rod exposed 20 points 30 points max. Primary conductor Appears properly installed (sag, conductor size, etc) oin' Improperly installed (conductor needs resagging, etc) 20 points 20 points max. Service conductor Appears properly installed (sag, conductor size, etc) 0. poin Improperly installed (conductor needs resagging, etc) 20 points 20 points max. Meter installation Appears to be properly installed (height, grounding, etc) Improperly installed (height, no ground, etc) 10 points 10 points max. Meter Condition Residential & Commercial Good (appears in good condition) Oxpoints Fair (minor corrosion) 10 points Poor (major corrosion, needs replacing) 20 points 30 points max. Over all condition of the system “Excellent (no repairs needed) 0 points *Good (minor repairs, resag guys, resag service drops, etc) “Poor (major repairs needed, pole, guy, conductor, meter replacement, etc) 30 points 30 points max. Underground Distribution System Primary conductor “Appears to be properly installed 0 points *Exposed conductor 20 points 20 points max. Transformers *Appears to be properly installed 0 points *Improperly installed (no pad, leaning, etc) 20 points a 20 points max. Service conductor “Appears to be properly installed 0 points *Exposed conductor 20 points 20 points max. *Indicates that only one of the group should be chosen. TOTAL 360 points max. General Questions Use separate sheet(s) to answer these questions. 1. If records are available, indicate the number, duration, and causes of all forced outages during the last 12 months. If records are not available, provide whatever reasonable estimates available from utility personnel regarding outages number, duration, and causes. 2. If waste heat from power generation is currently recovered, list the facilities to which waste heat is provided, and if known, the gallons of heating fuel displaced per year. 3. If additional waste heat is assumed available, describe the potential users of the waste heat and the gallons of fuel oil that could be displaced annually. Answers to General Questions: 1. No written records of forced outages, nor is there any clear recollection on the part of plant personnel on duration or cause. 2. There is no existing waste heat system in piace. 3. No know plans to have a waste heat system exist. Appendix 3. Rural Power System Assessment, Summary of Results 14 Akiachak Rural Power System Assessment Summary cf Results utility Akiachak Ltd. Electric Utility Akiak Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total utility Akiak Power Utilities April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 40 30 70 80 0 220 10 12 22 Raw Score 25 25 50 30 0 130 10 12 22 % of Highest Raw Score 20% 13% 39% 27% 0% 23% 13% 60% 22% % of Highest Raw Score 12% 11% 28% 10% 0% 13% 13% 60% 22% Evaluation Date 12/6/00 Rank 38 (1=worst to 169=best) 62 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 12/7/00 Rank 80 (1=worst to 169=best) 62 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 1 of 58 Akutan utility Akutan - Plant 2 Evaluation Date 12/20/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 65 7% 156 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 35 15% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) Alakanuk utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/16/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 95 10% 116 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 2 of 58 Allakaket utility Alaska Power & Telephone Ambler utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Anaktuvuk Pass utility North Slope Borough Power & Light Apri 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 45 30 20 30 0 125 20 28 Raw Score 20 70 0 20 0 110 40 48 Raw Score 20 100 40 10 0 170 40 48 % of Highest Raw Score 22% 13% 11% 10% 0% 13% 25% 40% 28% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 30% 0% 7% 0% 11% 50% 40% 48% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 43% 22% 3% 0% 17% 50% 40% 48% Evaluation Date 12/2/00 Rank 82 (1=worst to 169=best) 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/16/00 Rank 99 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/26/00 Rank 58 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 3 of 58 Angoon utility Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority Evaluation Date 1/7/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0) 0% Total 105 11% 106 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Aniak utility Aniak Light & Power Company Evaluation Date 12/4/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 15 1% Powerplant Environmental 10 6% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 60 6% 160 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management - 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Anvik utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 12/2/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 100 56% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 195 20% 46 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management 8 40% Total 23 23% 73 (1=best to 169=worst) April S. 2001 Page 4 of 58 Arctic Village utility Arctic Village Electric Company Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Atmautluak utility Atmautluak Tribal Utilities Atqasuk utility North Slope Borough Power & Light April $. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 80 130 80 40 0 330 70 20 90 Raw Score 20 30 15 130 195 15 23 Raw Score 35 85 50 50 0 220 40 48 % of Highest Raw Score 39% 57% 44% 13% 0% 34% 88% 100% 90% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 13% 8% 43% 0% 20% 19% 40% 23% % of Highest Raw Score 17% 37% 28% 17% 0% 23% 50% 40% 48% Evaluation Date 11/30/00 Rank 13. (1=worst to 169=best) 160 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/20/00 Rank 46 (1=worst to 169=best) 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/7/00 Rank 33 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 5 of 58 Beaver utility Beaver Joint Utilities Evaluation Date 11/6/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerpiant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 50 28% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 145 15% 69 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management 16 80% Total 26 26% 78 (1=best to 169=worst) Bettles utility Alaska Power & Telephone Evaluation Date 12/3/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 95 10% 116 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management i 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Birch Creek utility Birch Creek Village Electric Utility Evaluation Date 11/7/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 85 9% 130 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management 3375) 19% Total 18.75 19% 60 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 6 of 58 Brevig Mission utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/9/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 70 30% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 60 20% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total A758) 18% 55 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management 8 40% Total 18 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Buckland utility Buckland Electric Utility Evaluation Date 11/27/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 50 28% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 155 16% 62 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 7 16 80% Total 36 36% 112 (1=best to 169=worst) Central utility Central Power Company Evaluation Date 12/6/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 65 32% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 85 47% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 200 21% 44 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management 4 20% Total 44 44% 121 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 7 of 58 Chalkyitsik utility Chalkyitsik Village Energy System Evaluation Date 11/28/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 75 8% 147 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 20 100% Total 40 40% 115 (1=best to 169=worst) Chefornak utility Naterkaq Light Plant Evaluation Date 11/20/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 80 27% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 150 15% 65 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management , 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Chenega Bay utility Chenega Bay Electric Utility Evaluation Date 11/20/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 25 11% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 50 5% 165 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) April $ 2001 Page 8 of 58 Chevak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/18/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Chignik utility Chignik Bay Plant # 1 Evaluation Date 9/9/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 100 43% Powerplant Environmental 80 44% Overhead Distribution System 60 20% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 255 26% 33. (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 35 44% PCE Management 7 12 60% Total 47 47% 123 (1=best to 169=worst) utility Chignik Bay Plant # 2 Evaluation Date 9/9/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 45 22% Powerplant Equipment 120 52% Powerplant Environmental 70 39% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 265 27% 27 ~=(1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 35 44% PCE Management 12 60% Total 47 47% 123 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 9 of 58 Chignik Lagoon utility Chignik Lagoon Power Utility Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Chignik Lake utility Chignik Lake Electric Utility Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Chistochina utility Alaska Power & Telephone April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 35 15 10 65 15 23 Raw Score 35 60 15 0 0 110 40 16 56 Raw Score 40 65 5 0 0 110 15 23 % of Highest Raw Score 2% 15% 8% 3% 0% 7% 19% 40% 23% % of Highest Raw Score 17% 26% 8% 0% 0% 11% 50% 80% 56% °% of Highest Raw Score 20% 28% 3% 0% 0% 11% 19% 40% 23% Evaluation Date 9/11/00 Rank 156 (1=worst to 169=best) 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 9/12/00 Rank 99 (1=worst to 169=best) 145 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/6/01 Rank 99 (1=worst to 169=best) 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 10 of 58 Chitina utility Chitina Electric Inc. Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Chuathbaluk utility Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Circle Hot Springs utility Distribution System April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 175 230 150 50 =] Raw Score 25 50 60 0 0 135 10 18 Raw Score 20 20 % of Highest Raw Score 85% 100% 83% 0% 20% 4% % of Highest Raw Score 12% 22% 33% 0% 0% 14% 13% 40% 18% % of Highest Raw Score 0% 0% 0% 7% 0% 2% 0% 20% 4% Evaluation Date 11/7/00 Rank 1 (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/3/01 Rank 75 (1=worst to 169=best) 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 12/6/00 Rank 168 (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 11 of 58 Clark's Point utility Clark's Point Electric Utility Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Coffman Cove utility Coffman Cove Utilities Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management , Total Cold Bay Utility G & K Inc. April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 40 40 15 30 0 125 40 ° a o Raw Score 15 70 5 20 0 110 Raw Score 15 40 30 Roo ° © © % of Highest Raw Score 20% 17% 8% 10% 0% 13% 50% 50% 50% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 30% 3% 7% 0% 11% 0% 20% 4% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 17% 17% 0% 0% 9% 0% 40% 8% Evaluation Date 9/29/00 Rank 82 (1=worst to 169=best) 141 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/3/01 Rank 99 (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 9/10/00 Rank 130 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 12 of 58 Crooked Creek utility Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Raw Score Powerhouse Buliding 65 Powerplant Equipment 90 Powerplant Environmental 120 Overhead Distribution System 50 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 325 Operations and Maintenance 40 PCE Management 8 Total 48 Deering utility Ipnatchiaq Electric Company Raw Score Powerhouse Building 35 Powerplant Equipment 120 Powerplant Environmental 95 Overhead Distribution System 40 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 290 Operations and Maintenance 30 PCE Management . 12 Total 42 Eagle utility Eagle Power Company Raw Score Powerhouse Building 35 Powerplant Equipment 75 Powerplant Environmental 25 Overhead Distribution System 20 Underground Distribution System 20 Total 175 Operations and Maintenance 0 PCE Management 8 Total oo April 9. 2001 % of Highest Raw Score 32% 39% 67% 17% 0% 33% 50% 40% 48% % of Highest Raw Score 17% 52% 53% 13% 0% 30% 38% 60% 42% % of Highest Raw Score 17% 33% 14% 7% 33% 18% 0% 40% 8% Evaluation Date 1/3/01 Rank 14 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 12/1/00 Rank 21 + (1=worst to 169=best) 116 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/6/01 Rank 55 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 13 of 58 Eek utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/16/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% i Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 130 13% 80 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Egegik utility Egegik Light & Power Company Evaluation Date 11/10/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 14 of 58 Ekwok utility Ekwok Electric Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 25 20 40 90 20 16 36 utility Ekwok Electric Standby #2 Elfin Cove utility Elfin Cove Electric Utility Apri $. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 15 40 40 40 0 135 20 16 36 Raw Score 20 100 20 10 0 150 20 24 % of Highest Raw Score 2% 11% 11% 13% 0% 9% 25% 80% 36% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 17% 22% 13% 0% 14% 25% 80% 36% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 43% 11% 3% 0% 15% 25% 20% 24% Evaluation Date 9/14/00 Rank 123 (1=worst to 169=best) 112 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 9/14/00 Rank 75 (1=worst to 169=best) 112 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/9/01 Rank 65 (1=worst to 169=best) 75 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 15 of 58 Elim utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Poweriiouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 70 7% 150 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Emmonak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/15/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Fowerplant Equipment 65 28% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 95 10% 116 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 18 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Fort Yukon utility Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company Evaluation Date 11/2/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 45 22% Powerplant Equipment 55 24% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 180 18% 53 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management 8 40% Total 23 23% 73 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 16 of 58 Galena utility Galena Electric Utility Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerpiant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Gambell utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerpiant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Golovin utility Golovin Power Utilities Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total April 9. 2001 Raw Score 15 7 5 20 0 115) 16 16 Raw Score 25 55 10 0 0 90 Raw Score 50 140 130 60 380 40 16 56 % of Highest Raw Score 7% 33% 3% 7% 0% 12% 0% 80% 16% % of Highest Raw Score 12% 24% 6% 0% 0% 9% 0% 40% 8% % of Highest Raw Score 24% 61% 72% 20% 0% 39% 50% 80% 56% Evaluation Date 10/11/00 Rank 93 (1=worst to 169=best) 49 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/29/00 Rank 123 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/5/01 Rank 7 (1=worst to 169=best) 145 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 17 of 58 Goodnews Bay utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Raw Score Powerhouse Building 35 Powerplant Equipment 70 Powerplant Environmental 25 Overhead Distribution System 60 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 190 Operations and Maintenance 20 PCE Management 8 Total 28 Grayling utiity Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Raw Score Powerhouse Building 15 Powerplant Equipment 30 Powerplant Environmental 5 Overhead Distribution System 20 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 70 Operations and Maintenance 20 PCE Management 7 8 Total 28 Gustavus utility Gustavus Electric Company Raw Score Powerhouse Building 15 Powerplant Equipment 105 Powerplant Environmental 5 Overhead Distribution System 0 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 125 Operations and Maintenance 0 PCE Management 4 Total 4 April 9. 2001 % of Highest Raw Score 17% 30% 14% 20% 0% 19% 25% 40% 28% % of Highest Raw Score T% 13% 3% 7% 0% 7% 25% 40% 28% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 46% 3% 0% 0% 13% 0% 20% 4% Evaluation Date 1/10/01 Rank 49 (1=worst to 169=best) 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/9/00 Rank 150 (1=worst to 169=best) 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/7/01 Rank 82 (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 18 of 58 Haines utility Alaska Power & Telephone Evaluation Date 1/3/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 85 9% 130 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Healy Lake utility Alaska Power & Telephone Evaluation Date 1/5/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 18 37% Powerplant Equipment 45 20% Powerplant Environmental 80 44% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 200 21% 44 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 23 23% 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Hollis utility Alaska Power & Telephone Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building nS 7% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 70 7% 150 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 19 of 58 Holy Cross utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/7/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 45 20% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Hoonah utility Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority Evaluation Date 1/7/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 0 0% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 65 7% 156 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management , 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Hooper Bay utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/18/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 45 22% Powerplant Equipment 65 28% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 120 12% 89 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101. (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 20 of 58 Hughes utility Hughes Power & Light Company Evaluation Date 10/13/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 145 71% Powerplant Equipment 140 61% i Powerplant Environmental 80 44% Overhead Distribution System 110 37% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 475 49% 4 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 70 88% PCE Management 8 40% Total 78 78% 155 (1=best to 169=worst) Huslia utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 10/12/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 90 9% 123 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Hydaburg utility Alaska Power & Telephone Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 70 30% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 110 11% 99 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 21 of 58 Igiugig utility Igiugig Electric Company lliamna Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total utility Hiamna Power Plant Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total lvanof Bay Utility lvanof Bay Electric Utility April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 70 120 70 0 0 260 40 + Raw Score 10 55 10 50 0 125 Raw Score 70 80 80 30 0 260 80 20 100 % of Highest Raw Score 34% 52% 39% 0% 0% 27% 50% 20% 44% % of Highest Raw Score 5% 24% 6% 17% 0% 13% 0% 40% 8% % of Highest Raw Score 34% 35% 44% 10% 0% 27% 100% 100% 100% Evaluation Date 10/13/00 Rank 30 (1=worst to 169=best) 121 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/30/00 Rank 82 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 9/22/200 Rank 30 (1=worst to 169=best) 169 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 22 of 58 Kake utility Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority Kaktovik utility North Slope Borough Power & Light Kaltag utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Apri 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 55 20 10 90 Raw Score 15 30 0 30 0 75 40 8 48 Raw Score 20 55 20 10 0 105 20 28 % of Highest Raw Score 2% 24% 11% 3% 0% 9% 0% 20% 4% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 13% 0% 10% 0% 8% 50% 40% 48% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 24% 11% 3% 0% 11% 25% 40% 28% Evaluation Date 1/4/01 Rank 123 (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/19/00 Rank 147 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/12/00 Rank 106 (1=worst to 169=best) 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 23 of 58 Karluk utility Karluk Electric Evaluation Date 5/24/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 120 59% Powerplant Equipment 170 74% Powerplant Environmental 155 86% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 485 50% 3 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 80 100% PCE Management 20 100% Total 100 100% 169 (1=best to 169=worst) Kasaan utility Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority Evaluation Date 1/5/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 85 9% 130 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management . 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Kasigluk utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 12/5/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 100 10% 110 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 24 of 58 Kiana utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/20/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 115 12% 93 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management 8 40% Total 23 23% 73. (1=best to 169=worst) King Cove utility King Cove Electric Utility Evaluation Date 9/11/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 20 33% Total 80 8% 137. (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management . 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) utility King Cove Electric Utility Hydro Evaluation Date % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 0 0% Powerplant Equipment 0 0% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 0 0% 169 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 25 of 58 Kipnuk Utility Kipnuk Light Plant Evaluation Date 11/17/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Builaing 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 95 10% 116 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Kivalina utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/22/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 70 30% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 120 12% 89 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 5 6% PCE Management 8 40% Total 13 13% 48 (1=best to 169=worst) Klukwan utility Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 50 24% Powerplant Equipment 110 48% Powerplant Environmental 120 67% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 280 29% 24 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 26 of 58 Kobuk utility Kobuk Valley Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/11/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 40 20% Powerplant Equipment 55 24% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 145 15% 69 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 70 88% PCE Management 16 80% Total 86 86% 158 (1=best to 169=worst) Kokhanok utility Kokhanok Electric Utility Evaluation Date 10/16/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 55 27% Powerplant Equipment 105 46% Powerplant Environmental 75 42% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 265 27% 27 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management = 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Koliganek utility Koliganek Electric Utility Evaluation Date 11/17/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 5 2% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 55 6% 163 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 27 of 58 Kongiganak utility Puvurnaq Power Company Evaluation Date 11/17/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 70 34% Powerplant Equipment 110 48% Powerplant Environmental 55 31% Overhead Distribution System 90 30% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 325 33% 14 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 25 31% PCE Management 4 20% Total 29 29% 103 (1=best to 169=worst) Kotlik utility Kotlik Electric Service Evaluation Date 11/15/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 60 29% Powerplant Equipment 90 39% Powerplant Environmental 55 31% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 225 23% 35 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 25 31% PCE Management . 4 20% Total 29 29% 103 (1=best to 169=worst) Koyuk utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 0 0% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 30 3% 167 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 28 of 58 Koyukuk utility Koyukuk Electric Utility Evaluation Date 9/20/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 105 51% Powerpiant Equipment 80 35% Powerplant Environmental 180 100% Overhead Distribution System 190 63% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 555 57% 2 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 60 75% PCE Management 8 40% Total 68 68% 152 (1=best to 169=worst) Kwethluk utility Kuiggluum Kallugvia Evaluation Date 12/8/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 40 20% Powerplant Equipment 65 28% Powerplant Environmental 70 39% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 215 22% 41 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15. 19% PCE Management , 12 60% Total 7 27% 80 (1=best to 169=worst) Kwigillingok utility Kwig Power Company Evaluation Date 11/16/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 105 51% Powerplant Equipment 130 57% Powerplant Environmental 55 31% Overhead Distribution System 60 20% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 350 36% 10 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 50 63% PCE Management 12 60% Total 62 62% 149 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 29 of 58 Lake Minchumina utility Lake Minchumina Power Company Evaluation Date 11/12/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 50 24% Powerplant Equipment 100 43% Powerplant Environmental 35 19% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 205 21% 42 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 80 100% PCE Management 20 100% Total 100 100% 169 (1=best to 169=worst) Larsen Bay utility Larsen Bay Utility Company Evaluation Date 5/23/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 45 22% Powerplant Equipment 110 48% Powerplant Environmental 90 50% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 265 27% 27 ~=(1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management - 4 20% Total 44 44% 121 (1=best to 169=worst) Levelock utility Levelock Electric Cooperative Inc. Evaluation Date 9/8/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 5) 2% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 25 14% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 12 60% Total 32 32% 105 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 30 of 58 Lime Village utility Lime Village Utility Evaluation Date 11/3/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmenta 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 12 60% Total 32 32% 105 (1=best to 169=worst) Lower Kalskag utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 12/1/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 65 28% Powerplant Environmental 50 28% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 135 14% 75 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management ’ 8 40% Total 23 23% 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Manley Hot Springs utility Manley Utility Company Inc. Evaluation Date 10/16/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 0 0% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 40 4% 166 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) April $ 2001 Page 31 of 58 Manokotak utility Manokotak Power Company Raw Score Powerhouse Building 65 Powerplant Equipment 80 Powerplant Environmental 130 Overhead Distribution System 60 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 335 Operations and Maintenance 80 PCE Management 12 Total 92 Marshall utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Raw Score Powerhouse Building 10 Powerplant Equipment 75 Powerplant Environmental 70 Overhead Distribution System 30 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 185 Operations and Maintenance 10 PCE Management . 8 Total 18 McGrath utility McGrath Light and Power Raw Score Powerhouse Building 20 Powerplant Equipment 60 Powerplant Environmental 5 Overhead Distribution System 30 Underground Distribution System 0 Total 115 Operations and Maintenance 10 PCE Management 8 Total 18 April 9, 2001 % of Highest Raw Score 32% 35% 72% 20% 0% 34% 100% 60% 92% % of Highest Raw Score 5% 33% 39% 10% 0% 19% 13% 40% 18% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 26% 3% 10% 0% 12% 13% 40% 18% Evaluation Date 9/25/00 Rank 12 (1=worst to 169=best) 162 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/6/01 Rank 50 (1=worst to 169=best) 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/1/00 Rank 93 (1=worst to 169=best) 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 32 of 58 Mekoryuk utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerpiant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Mentasta Lake utility Alaska Power & Telephone April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 20 75 15 50 0 160 Raw Score 80 70 70 0 0 220 30 38 % of Highest Raw Score 10% 33% 8% 17% 0% 16% 0% 40% 8% % of Highest Raw Score 39% 30% 39% 0% 0% 23% 38% 40% 38% Evaluation Date 1/10/01 Rank 61 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/6/01 Rank 38 (1=worst to 169=best) 114 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 33 of 58 Metlakatla Utility Metlakatla Power & Light - Hydro utility Metlakatla Power & Light - Standby Minto utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Apri 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 15 45 5 20 0 85 0 0 0 Raw Score 15 45 5 20 0 85 Raw Score 10 60 15 10 0 95 40 8 48 % of Highest Raw Score 7% 20% 3% 7% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 20% 3% 7% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% % of Highest Raw Score 5% 26% 8% 3% 0% 10% 50% 40% 48% Evaluation Date 1/12/01 Rank 130 (1=worst to 169=best) 2 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/12/01 Rank 130 (1=worst to 169=best) 2. (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/16/00 Rank 116 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 34 of 58 Mountain Village utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/30/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 40 22% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 135 14% 75 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Naknek utility Naknek Electric Association Evaluation Date 1/2/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 5 2% Powerplant Equipment 70 30% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management : 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Napakiak utility Napakiak Ircinraq Power Company Evaluation Date 9/19/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 75 37% Powerplant Equipment 80 35% Powerplant Environmental 90 50% Overhead Distribution System 70 23% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 315 32% 16 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 80 100% PCE Management 12 60% Total 92 92% 162 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 35 of 58 Napaskiak utility Napaskiak Electric Utility Evaluation Date 11/10/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 60 20% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 155 16% 62 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 30 38% PCE Management 4 20% Total 34 34% 109 (1=best to 169=worst) Naukati utility Coffman Cove Utilities Evaluation Date 1/3/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 70 7% 150 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management . 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Nelson Lagoon utility Nelson Lagoon Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 9/6/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 70 30% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 90 9% 123 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 70 88% PCE Management 4 20% Total 74 74% 153 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 36 of 58 New Stuyahok utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Newtok Raw Score 35 30 5 0 0 70 20 8 28 utility Ungusraq Power Company Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Nightmute utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total April 9. 2001 Raw Score 65 110 150 30 355 40 44 Raw Score 35 75 40 110 260 10 18 Evaluation Date 1/8/01 % of Highest Raw Score Rank 17% 13% 3% 0% 0% 7% 150 (1=worst to 169=best) 25% 40% 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 12/1/00 % of Highest Raw Score Rank 32% 48% 83% 10% 0% 36% 9 (1=worst to 169=best) 50% 20% 44% 121 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/14/01 % of Highest Raw Score Rank 17% 33% 22% 37% 0% 27% 30 (1=worst to 169=best) 13% 40% 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 37 of 58 Nikolai utility Nikolai Light & Power Utility Noatak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Noorvik utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 75 90 50 10 0 225 80 > Raw Score 35 70 10 10 0 125 35 43 Raw Score 15 50 10 0 0 15 % of Highest Raw Score 37% 39% 28% 3% 0% 23% 100% 20% 84% % of Highest Raw Score 17% 30% 6% 3% 0% 13% 44% 40% 43% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 22% 6% 0% 0% 8% 0% 40% 8% Evaluation Date 11/2/00 Rank 35 (1=worst to 169=best) 157 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/22/00 Rank 82 (1=worst to 169=best) 117 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/20/00 Rank 147 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 38 of 58 Northway utility Northway Power & Light Company Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 150 15% 65 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management 8 40% Total 23 23% 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Nuiqsut utility North Slope Borough Power & Light Evaluation Date 10/18/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 10 4% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 55 6% 163 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management i 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Nulato utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 10/13/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 35 15% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 100 10% 110 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 39 of 58 Nunam Iqua utility Nunam Iqua Electric Inc. Evaluation Date 11/16/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 65 32% Powerplant Equipment 55 24% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 145 15% 69 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 4 20% Total 24 24% 75 (1=best to 169=worst) Ouzinkie utility Ouzinkie Electric Evaluation Date 5/22/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 70 7% 150 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Pedro Bay utility Pedro Bay Electric Utility Evaluation Date 10/17/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 85 41% Powerplant Equipment 70 30% Powerplant Environmental 100 56% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 20 33% Total 295 30% 20 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 60 75% PCE Management 8 40% Total 68 68% 152 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 40 of 58 Pelican utility Pelican Hydro Plant Evaluation Date 1/10/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 10 5% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 60 6% 160 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 5 25% Total 25 25% 77 ~(1=best to 169=worst) utility Pelican Utility Company Evaluation Date 1/10/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 50 24% Powerplant Equipment 100 43% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 185 19% 50 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 5 25% Total 25 25% 77 (1=best to 169=worst) Perryville utility Perryville Electric Utility Evaluation Date 9/13/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 50 24% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 25 14% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 95 10% 116 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 41 of 58 Pilot Point utility Pilot Point Electric Utility Evaluation Date 9/19/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 50 24% Powerplani Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 55 31% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 175 18% 55 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management 8 40% Total 18 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Pilot Station utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/20/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmentai 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 120 12% 89 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 25 31% PCE Management 7 8 40% Total 33 33% 108 (1=best to 169=worst) Platinum utility Platinum Electric Utility Evaluation Date 1/12/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 70 34% Powerplant Equipment 120 52% Powerplant Environmental 90 50% Overhead Distribution System 110 37% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 390 40% 6 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 80 100% PCE Management 16 80% Total 96 96% 163 (1=best to 169=worst) Apri 3. 2001 Page 42 of 58 Point Hope utility North Slope Borough Power & Light Evaluation Date 11/13/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 100 43% Powerplant Environmental 20 11% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 195 20% 46 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Point Lay uulity North Slope Borough Power & Light Evaluation Date 11/8/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 90 39% Powerplant Environmental 110 61% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 270 28% 26 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management , 8 40% Total 48 48% 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Port Alsworth utility Tanalian Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/15/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 55 24% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 100 10% 110 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 43 of 58 Port Heiden utility Port Heiden Electric Utility Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Quinhagak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Rampart Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 70 80 65 10 0 225 80 20 100 Raw Score 25 110 15 20 0 170 25 33 utility Rampart Village Energy Systems April S. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 45 30 40 10 0 125 30 75 37.5 % of Highest Raw Score 34% 35% 36% 3% 0% 23% 100% 100% 100% % of Highest Raw Score 12% 48% 8% 7% 0% 17% 31% 40% 33% % of Highest Raw Score 22% 13% 22% 3% 0% 13% 38% 38% 38% Evaluation Date 9/20/00 Rank 35 (1=worst to 169=best) 169 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/15/01 Rank 58 (1=worst to 169=best) 108 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/11/00 Rank 82 (1=worst to 169=best) 113 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 44 of 58 Red Devil utility Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/3/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmenta 60 33% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 95 10% 116 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management 8 40% Total 18 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Ruby utuity Ruby Electric Utility Evaluation Date 10/12/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 65 32% Powerplant Equipment 30 13% Powerplant Environmental 30 17% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 165 17% 60 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 45 56% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 53 53% 143 (1=best to 169=worst) Russian Mission utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 0 0% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmental 50 28% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 100 10% 110 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 45 of 58 Saint George utility Saint George Municipal Electric Utility Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Saint Mary's utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Saint Michael utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Apri 9 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 10 75 40 10 0 135 45 16 61 Raw Score 10 60 50 20 0 140 20 28 Raw Score 10 25 25 0 0 60 % of Highest Raw Score 5% 33% 22% 3% 0% 14% 56% 80% 61% % of Highest Raw Score 5% 26% 28% 7% 0% 14% 25% 40% 28% % of Highest Raw Score 5% 11% 14% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 8% Evaluation Date 2/16/01 Rank 75 (1=worst to 169=best) 148 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/20/00 Rank 72 (1=worst to 169=best) 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/2/01 Rank 160 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 46 of 58 Saint Paul utility Saint Paul Municipal Electric Utility Evaluation Date 2/18/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 0 0% Powerplant Equipment 85 37% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 100 10% 110 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Sand Point utility Sand Point Electric Inc. Evaluation Date 9/12/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 5 2% Powerplant Equipment 75 33% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 85 9% 130 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 40 50% PCE Management P 12 60% Total 52 52% 142 (1=best to 169=worst) Savoonga utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/28/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 110 11% £9 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Aprii $ 2001 Page 47 of 58 Scammon Bay utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/29/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 35 17% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmental 10 6% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 125 13% 82 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 15 19% PCE Management 8 40% Total 23 23% 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Selawik utuity Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/21/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 20 9% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 105 11% 106 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 20 25% PCE Management . 8 40% Total 28 28% 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Shageluk utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/7/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 25 11% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 80 8% 137. (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 25 31% PCE Management 8 40% Total 33 33% 108 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 48 of 58 Shaktoolik utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/5/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 15 7% Powerplant Equipment 60 26% Powerplant Environmenta! 45 25% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 120 12% 89 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 5 6% PCE Management 8 40% Total 13 13% 48 (1=best to 169=worst) Shishmaref utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/12/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 60 29% Powerplant Equipment 100 43% Powerplant Environmental 100 56% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 300 31% 18 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management if 8 40% Total 18 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Shungnak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 11/24/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 40 17% Powerplant Environmenta! 0 0% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 65 7% 156 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9, 2001 Page 49 of 58 Sleetmute utility Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Stebbins utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Stevens Village utility Stevens Village Energy System Apr: 2 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 70 90 90 50 0 300 50 58 Raw Score 15 65 35 0 0 115 Raw Score 50 100 60 80 0 290 50 12.5 62.5 % of Highest Raw Score 34% 39% 50% 17% 0% 31% 63% 40% 58% % of Highest Raw Score 7% 28% 19% 0% 0% 12% 0% 40% 8% % of Highest Raw Score 24% 43% 33% 27% 0% 30% 63% 63% 63% Evaluation Date 1/11/01 Rank 18 (1=worst to 169=best) 146 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 12/8/00 Rank 93 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 12/5/00 Rank 21 = (1=worst to 169=best) 150 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 50 of 58 Stony River utility Middle Kuskokwim Electric Cooperative Takotna Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 60 120 100 140 420 70 78 % of Highest Raw Score 29% 52% 56% 47% 0% 43% 88% 40% 78% utility Takotna Community Association Utilities Tanana utility Tanana Power Company Apri 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 45 60 35 40 0 180 80 Raw Score 40 15 20 80 % of Highest Raw Score 22% 26% 19% 13% 0% 18% 100% 20% 84% % of Highest Raw Score 2% 17% 8% 7% 0% 8% 0% 20% 4% Evaluation Date 1/11/01 Rank 5 (1=worst to 169=best) 155 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 11/3/00 Rank 53 (1=worst to 169=best) 157 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/11/00 Rank 137. (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 51 of 58 Tatitlek utility Tatitlek Electric Utility Evaluation Date 11/8/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score = Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 80 44% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 150 15% 65 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 70 88% PCE Management 20 100% Total 90 90% 160 (1=best to 169=worst) Telida utility Telida Village Utility Evaluation Date 11/2/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 130 63% Powerplant Equipinent 90 39% Powerplant Environmental 80 44% Overhead Distribution System 40 13% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 340 35% 11. (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 80 100% PCE Management [ 20 100% Total 100 100% 169 (1=best to 169=worst) utility Telida Village Utility Plant 2 Evaluation Date 11/2/00 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 80 39% Powerplant Equipment 90 39% Powerplant Environmental 110 61% Overhead Distribution System 0 0% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 280 29% 24 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 80 100% PCE Management 20 100% Total 100 100% 169 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 52 of 58 Teller utility Teller Power Company Tetlin Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Undergrouna Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 45 100 50 40 235 20 28 utility Alaska Power & Telephone Togiak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative April 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 40 10 30 10 0 90 15 8 23 Raw Score 10 55 0 40 0 105 20 28 % of Highest Raw Score 22% 43% 28% 13% 0% 24% 25% 40% 28% % of Highest Raw Score 20% 4% 17% 3% 0% 9% 19% 40% 23% % of Highest Raw Score 5% 24% 0% 13% 0% 11% 25% 40% 28% Evaluation Date 1/8/01 Rank 34 =(1=worst to 169=best) 101 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/4/01 Rank 123. (1=worst to 169=best) 73 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 9/26/00 Rank 106 (1=worst to 169=best) 101. (1=best to 169=worst) Page 53 of 58 Tok utility Alaska Power & Telephone Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 80 35% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 10 3% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 115 12% 93 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 10 13% PCE Management 8 40% Total 18 18% 59 (1=best to 169=worst) Toksook Bay utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/12/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 55 24% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 50 17% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 140 14% 72 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management , 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Tuluksak utility Tuluksaf Traditional Council Power Utility Evaluation Date 1/9/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 70 34% Powerplant Equipment 100 43% Powerplant Environmental 130 72% Overhead Distribution System 80 27% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 380 39% 7 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 55 69% PCE Management 4 20% Total 59 59% 147 (1=best to 169=worst) April ¢ 2001 Page 54 of 58 Tuntutuliak utility Tuntutuliak Community Service Association Tununak utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Twin Hills utility Twin Hills Electric Utility Aprii 9. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 85 95 75 60 0 315 45 49 Raw Score 20 75 40 20 0 155 Raw Score 45 50 40 50 0 185 40 10 50 % of Highest Raw Score 41% 41% 42% 20% 0% 32% 56% 20% 49% % of Highest Raw Score 10% 33% 22% 7% 0% 16% 0% 40% 8% % of Highest Raw Score 22% 22% 22% 17% 0% 19% 50% 50% 50% Evaluation Date 11/14/00 Rank 16 (1=worst to 169=best) 139 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 1/11/01 Rank 62 (1=worst to 169=best) 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 9/26/00 Rank 50 (1=worst to 169=best) 141 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 55 of 58 Unalakleet utility Unalakleet Valley Electric Cooperative Venetie Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total utility Venetie Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Wainwright utility North Slope Borough Power & Light April $. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 10 60 0 20 0 90 Raw Score 25 25 30 30 0 110 15 12 27 Raw Score 35 100 30 40 0 205 40 48 % of Highest Raw Score 5% 26% 0% 7% 0% 9% 0% 20% 4% % of Highest Raw Score 12% 11% 17% 10% 0% 11% 19% 60% 27% % of Highest Raw Score 17% 43% 17% 13% 0% 21% 50% 40% 48% Evaluation Date 11/30/00 Rank 123 (1=worst to 169=best) 18 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 2/2/01 Rank 99 (1=worst to 169=best) 80 (1=best to 169=worst) Evaluation Date 10/16/00 Rank 42 (1=worst to 169=best) 138 (1=best to 169=worst) Page 56 of 58 Wales utility Alaska Village Electric Cooperative Evaluation Date 1/13/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 30 15% Powerplant Equipment 65 28% Powerplant Environmental 15 8% Overhead Distribution System 30 10% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 140 14% 72 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 8 40% Total 8 8% 39 (1=best to 169=worst) Whale Pass utility Coffman Cove Utilities Evaluation Date 1/3/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 25 12% Powerplant Equipment 50 22% Powerplant Environmental 5 3% Overhead Distribution System 20 7% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 100 10% 110 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management a 4 20% Total 4 4% 18 (1=best to 169=worst) White Mountain utility White Mountain Electric Utility Evaluation Date 1/4/01 % of Highest Raw Score Raw Score Rank Powerhouse Building 20 10% Powerplant Equipment 5 2% Powerplant Environmentai 10 6% Overhead Distribution System 80 27% Underground Distribution System 0 0% Total 115 12% 93 (1=worst to 169=best) Operations and Maintenance 0 0% PCE Management 12 60% Total 12 12% 46 (1=best to 169=worst) April 9. 2001 Page 57 of 58 Yakutat utility Yakutat Borough Electric Utility April ¢. 2001 Powerhouse Building Powerplant Equipment Powerplant Environmental Overhead Distribution System Underground Distribution System Total Operations and Maintenance PCE Management Total Raw Score 45 115 25 100 285 % of Highest Raw Score 22% 50% 14% 33% 0% 29% 0% 20% 4% Rank 23 18 Evaluation Date 1/2/01 (1=worst to 169=best) (1=best to 169=worst) Page 58 of 58