HomeMy WebLinkAboutFalse Pass Hydroelectric Feasibility REF App1Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Application Forms and Instructions
This instruction page and the following grant application constitutes the Grant Application Form
for Round VIII of the Renewable Energy Fund. A separate application form is available for
projects with a primary purpose of producing heat (see RFA section 1.5). This is the standard
form for all other projects, including projects that will produce heat and electricity. An electronic
version of the Request for Applications (RFA) and both application forms is available online at:
http://www.akenergyauthority.org/Programs/Renewable-Energy-Fund/Rounds#round9.
If you need technical assistance filling out this application, please contact Shawn Calfa,
the Alaska Energy Authority Grants Administrator at (907) 771-3031 or at
scalfa@aidea.org.
If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application
forms for each project.
Multiple phases (e.g. final design, construction) for the same project may be submitted
as one application.
If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide
milestones and grant budget for each phase of the project.
In order to ensure that grants provide sufficient benefit to the public, AEA may limit
recommendations for grants to preliminary development phases in accordance with 3
ACC 107.605(1).
If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting
funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the
preceding phases are completed and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
Supporting documentation may include, but is not limited to, reports, conceptual or final
designs, models, photos, maps, proof of site control, utility agreements, power sale
agreements, relevant data sets, and other materials. Please provide a list of supporting
documents in Section 11 of this application and attach the documents to your
application.
If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in
reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with
your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed.
Please provide a list of additional information; including any web links, in section 12 of
this application and attach the documents to your application. For guidance on
application best practices please refer to the resource specific Best Practices Checklists;
links to the checklists can be found in the appendices list at the end of the
accompanying REF Round IX RFA.
In the sections below, please enter responses in the spaces provided. You may add
additional rows or space to the form to provide sufficient space for the information, or
attach additional sheets if needed.
REMINDER:
Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act AS 40.25, and materials
submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no
statutory exemptions apply.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final
recommendations are made to the legislature.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
In accordance with 3 AAC 107.630 (b) Applicants may request trade secrets or
proprietary company data be kept confidential subject to review and approval by the
Authority. If you want information to be kept confidential the applicant must:
o Request the information be kept confidential.
o Clearly identify the information that is the trade secret or proprietary in their
application.
o Receive concurrence from the Authority that the information will be kept
confidential. If the Authority determines it is not conf idential it will be treated as a
public record in accordance with AS 40.25 or returned to the applicant upon
request.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION
Please specify the legal grantee that will own, operate, and maintain the project upon
completion.
Name (Name of utility, IPP, local government, or other government entity)
City of False Pass
Type of Entity: Fiscal Year End:
Municipal Government June 30
Tax ID #
Tax Status: ☐ For-profit ☐ Non-profit ☒ Government (check one)
Date of last financial statement audit: City of False Pass does CFS at end of every fiscal
year. Last audit was for 2005, and was finished November 21, 2006.
Mailing Address: Physical Address:
Box 50 180 Unimak Dr
False Pass, AK 99583 False Pass, AK 99583
Telephone: Fax: Email:
907-548-2319 907-548-2214 cityoffalsepass@ak.net
1.1 Applicant Point of Contact / Grants Manager
Name: Christopher Emrich Title: City Clerk
Mailing Address: Box 50, False Pass, AK 99583
Telephone: Fax: Email:
907-548-2319 907-548-2214 cityoffalsepass@ak.net
1.1.1 APPLICANT SIGNATORY AUTHORITY CONTACT INFORMATION
Name: Nicole Hoblet Title: Mayor
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 50
False Pass, AK 99583-0050
Telephone: Fax: Email:
907-548-2319 907-548-2214 cityoffalsepass@ak.net
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
1.1.2 Applicant Alternate Points of Contact
Name Telephone: Fax: Email:
Christopher Emrich 907-548-4004 christopheremrich@yahoo.com
Angel Drobnica 907-586-0161 adrobnica@apicda.com
1.2 Applicant Minimum Requirements
Please check as appropriate. If applicants do not meet the minimum requirements, the
application will be rejected.
1.2.1 Applicant Type
☒ An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05,
or
☐ An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or
☒ A local government, or
☐ A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities)
1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (continued)
Please check as appropriate.
☒ 1.2.2 Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for the project by the
applicant’s board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the
applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s governing
authority is necessary. (Indicate by checking the box)
☒ 1.2.3 As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and
follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant
agreement (Section 3 of the RFA). (Indicate by checking the box)
☒ 1.2.4 If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the award as
identified in the Standard Grant Agreement template at
http://www.akenergyauthority.org/Programs/Renewable-Energy-Fund/Rounds#round9.
(Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the application.) (Indicate by
checking the box)
☒ 1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant funds
for the benefit of the general public. If no please describe the nature of the project and
who will be the primary beneficiaries. (Indicate yes by checking the box)
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY
2.1 Project Title
Provide a 4 to 7 word title for your project. Type in the space below.
False Pass Hydroelectric Feasibility Study and Conceptual Design
2.2 Project Location
2.2.1 Location of Project – Latitude and longitude (preferred), street address, or
community name.
Latitude and longitude coordinates may be obtained from Google Maps by finding you project’s
location on the map and then right clicking with the mouse and selecting “What is here? The
coordinates will be displayed in the Google search window above the map in a format as
follows: 61.195676.-149.898663. If you would like assistance obtaining this information please
contact AEA at 907-771-3031.
The Project’s physical location at False Pass, Alaska:
54.853940° North Latitude and -163.408830° West Longitude. (Sec. 34, T061S, R094W,
Seward Meridian.)
2.2.2 Community benefiting – Name(s) of the community or communities that will be the
beneficiaries of the project.
The City of False Pass community will be the beneficiary of this Project. The regional
beneficiary will be the Southwest Alaska Municipal Conference.
2.3 Project Type
Please check as appropriate.
2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type
☐ Wind ☐ Biomass or Biofuels (excluding heat-
only)
☒ Hydro, Including Run of River ☐ Hydrokinetic
☐ Geothermal, Excluding Heat Pumps ☐ Transmission of Renewable Energy
☐ Solar Photovoltaic ☐ Storage of Renewable
☐ Other (Describe) ☐ Small Natural Gas
2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply)
Pre-Construction Construction
☐ Reconnaissance ☐ Final Design and Permitting
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
☒ Feasibility and Conceptual Design ☐ Construction
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
2.4 Project Description
Provide a brief one paragraph description of the proposed project.
The City of False Pass requests funding from the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) in the amount
of $187,000 through the Renewable Energy Grant Program for a Hydroelectric Feasibility Study
and Conceptual Design of Unga Man Creek. Reconnaissance work funded by the City and
performed in August 2015 suggests that Unga Man Creek may hold adequate hydro potential to
meet approximately 86% of the City’s electrical needs.
This proposal will build upon recent efforts in order to confirm the viability of hydro power to
reduce the community’s dependence on diesel and provide a stable and renewable source of
electricity. This project is consistent the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Regional Energy Plan (link
provided in Section 11) and AEA’s strategic goals. The City of False pass believes that this
project will provide significant benefits to the public and represents a relatively low risk and high
value hydroelectric project.
2.5 Scope of Work
Provide a scope of work detailing the tasks to be performed under this funding request. This
should include work paid for by grant funds and matching funds or performed as in-kind match.
The feasibility and conceptual design work on Unga Man Creek will focus on the following
areas:
Task 1: Resource assessment.
Continue hydrology study at Unga Man Creek by continuing periodic stream flow measurements
and maintenance of existing stream gauges installed in August 2015. Analyze stream flow data
after one year of data collection to identify correlations with long term regional hydrology or
precipitation records to guide project sizing and design. Complete topographic surveys to
confirm project head and guide general layout of project features. Conduct geotechnical site
evaluation to identify surficial geology and stratigraphy at intake site; slide and rock stability
analysis; structural fill analysis and initial geotechnical characterizations.
Task 2: Identify land required for the project, including for power line extensions and site
access, and review existing land ownership in the proposed project footprint. Use existing
information, and new information where necessary, to develop project base map showing land
status and ownership, including relevant boundaries, features, and topographic data within the
project boundary. Conduct preliminary discussions with land owners regarding approvals that
will be required for the project, confirm land rights can be secured for project development.
Review federal, state and local regulatory issues as pertinent to project development,
summarize actions required to secure all needed regulatory approvals, and develop plan for
obtaining regulatory approvals for project.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Task 3: Preliminary permitting analysis including consultations with agencies, public reviews
and meetings. Once a preferred project configuration is identified, file a Declaration of Intention
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to determine the jurisdictional status of
the project. Conducted field work (fisheries, wetlands) as needed to characterize permitting
requirements and project feasibility. Work with fisheries biologist to investigate anadromous
and resident species presence, spatial and temporal distribution. Determine minimum flow
reservation needs and/or potential mitigation options, including possible off-site mitigation
opportunities.
Task 4: Assess current electrical system: identify current condition and configuration; install
metering system to measure and record 15-minute load data; review historic utility data to
summarize utility finances and electricity costs, monthly average and peak loads, and develop
load growth projections; identify necessary upgrades to electrical system for integration of hydro
project, including power line extensions, diesel plant upgrades, and control system upgrades.
Task 5: Develop project configurations based on technical, economic, environmental and
regulatory constraints for analysis. Configurations may include different diversion and/or
powerhouse sites, penstock routes, installed capacities and/or other parameters to identify the
optimal project configuration for False Pass. Assess these project configurations with regard to
technical, economic, environmental and regulatory criteria for feasibility and benefit to the
community. Identify a recommended project configuration. Task 6: Prepare a conceptual
design and cost estimate for the recommended project configuration. Conceptual design will
specify the project design flow; location of the diversion site, project access roads, staging
areas, and construction extents, penstock, power line extension, and powerhouse; lands
required for development; diversion configuration; powerhouse layout and turbine technology;
and general control upgrades required to integrate hydro and diesel power plants. Conceptual
designs will be suitable for initiating the permitting process for the project with applicable
agencies / entities. Cost estimate will include estimated costs for design/permitting and
construction/commissioning.
Task 7: Complete a comprehensive economic and financial analysis of the recommended
project configuration. Use Task 1 hydrology data, Task 3 environmental data, and Task 4 load
data to develop detailed load and dispatch model that forecasts hydro generation output,
capacity factor, utility load met by hydro, and excess hydro output that may be available for
future load growth or interruptible uses (space heating, etc.). Model will include variable inputs
for generation efficiency, fuel cost, capacity, and related utility parameters. Identify specific
uses and load profiles for use of interruptible energy from project. Estimate hydro operations
and maintenance costs, and significant repair / replacement costs and schedule over the life of
the project.
Task 8: Prepare a business plan for the utility with the recommended hydro project, Evaluate
financing options and develop pro forma financials projecting operating costs, utility revenues,
and utility rates for representative financing options. Pro forma financials and rates will include
a sinking fund to cover significant hydro repair/replacement events over the life of the project.
Task 9: Prepare a draft final report presenting all of the information above and results of
assessment. Provide report to community stakeholders and AEA for review and comment.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Task 10: Address community stakeholder and AEA comments and issue final report stamped by
licensed professional engineer.
SECTION 3 – Project Management, Development, and Operation
3.1 Schedule and Milestones
Criteria: Stage 2-1.A: The proposed schedule is clear, realistic, and described in adequate
detail.
Please fill out the schedule below (or attach a similar sheet) for the work covered by this funding
request. Be sure to identify key tasks and decision points in in your project along with estimated
start and end dates for each of the milestones and tasks. Please clearly identify the beginning
and ending of all phases of your proposed project. Add additional rows as needed.
Milestones Tasks (see section 2.5) Start
Date
End
Date
Deliverables
Grant Agreement
in Place
Review, execute Grant
Agreement with AEA
7/1/16 8/1/16 Signed Grant
Agreement
Contractor
Solicitation
Finalize team
responsibilities, contracts.
7/1/16 8/1/16 Summary of team
responsibilities and
final scope and
schedule.
1. Resource
Assessment
Land status/ownership,
Topographic survey,
hydrology study, utility load
metering,
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
2. Identify land
and regulatory
issues
Review land status, prepare
project base map. Review
regulatory issues.
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
3. Permitting and
environmental
analysis
Initial consultations with key
agencies; identify possible
avoidance, minimization and
mitigation options for
identified issues. Additional
fisheries studies if
warranted.
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
4. Analysis of
energy costs,
future energy
markets
Compile available energy
system data, characterize
possible markets.
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
5. Develop and Develop project 9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
assess project
configurations
configurations; analyze
benefits, costs for each.
6. Conceptual
design and cost
estimate for
recommended
configuration
Develop conceptual design
and cost estimate for
recommended project
configuration
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
7. Economic and
financial analysis
Perform economic and
financial analysis of
recommended project
configuration
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
8. Conceptual
business and
operations plan
with electric rate
pro format
Develop conceptual
business and operations
plan for recommended
project configuration.
9/1/16 8/1/17 Final report
9. Draft Report
and
Recommendations
Draft report submitted to
City, AEA for review and
comment
8/1/17 9/1/17 Draft report for
review/comment
10. Final Report Final report submitted to
AEA
9/1/17 9/15/17 Final report
3.2 Budget
Criteria: Stage 2-1.B: The cost estimates for project development, operation, maintenance, fuel,
and other project items meet industry standards or are otherwise justified.
3.2.1 Budget Overview
Describe your financial commitment to the project. List the amount of funds needed for project
completion and the anticipated nature and sources of funds. Consider all project phases,
including future phases not covered in this funding request.
The feasibility and conceptual design work under this proposal amounts to $220,000 with the
sources of funding being: (1) $187,000 from AEA and (2) $16,500 matching funds from the City
of False Pass (3) $16,500 Matching funds from APICDA.
For subsequent phases of the project, the City of False Pass will work will project partners
including the False Pass Tribal Corporation, the Isanotski Corporation, APICDA and the
Aleutians East Borough to identify and source grant funding through the Department of Energy,
AEA and the USDA RUS.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
In addition, the City of False has the capacity to finance the construction phases of this project
through conventional loans/bonding. The City has reserve funds set aside to help facilitate
immediate financing needs of the project. If it becomes imperative, the City would explore the
issuance of bonds and will seek assistance from the Aleutians East Borough with bond
financing.
The City currently uses State Revenue sharing funds and APICDA dividends to purchase diesel
for the generators. These funds eliminate a fuel surcharge to customers, keeping the cost of
energy stable. If fuel purchases are reduced or avoided as a result of renewable energy
generation, this money could otherwise be used to finance debt on the project.
These annual payments are approximately $150,000, which would support approximately $2 to
3.5 million in construction debt depending on financing terms.
The City of False Pass funded the first phase of reconnaissance work for the project through a
contract with Living System Designs LLC. .
3.2.2 Budget Forms
Applications MUST include a separate worksheet for each project phase that was identified in
section 2.3.2 of this application, (I. Reconnaissance, II. Feasibility and Conceptual Design, III.
Final Design and Permitting, and IV. Construction. Please use the tables provided below to
detail your proposed project’s total budget. Be sure to use one table for each phase of your
project. The milestones and tasks should match those listed in 3.1 above.
If you have any question regarding how to prepare these tables or if you need assistance
preparing the application please feel free to contact AEA at 907-771-3031 or by emailing the
Grants Administrator, Shawn Calfa, at scalfa@aidea.org.
Milestone or Task
RE- Fund
Grant
Funds
Grantee
Matching
Funds
Source of Matching
Funds:
Cash/In-kind/Federal
Grants/Other State
Grants/Other
TOTALS
Grant Agreement in Place $0 $0 NA $0
Contractor Solicitation $0 $0 NA $0
1. Resource Assessment $64,600 $11,400 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $76,000
2. Identify land and
regulatory issues $8,500 $1,500 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $10,000
3. Permitting and
environmental analysis $29,800 $5,200 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $35,000
4. Analysis of energy costs,
future energy markets $12,800 $2,200 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $15,000
5. Develop and assess
project configurations $12,800 $2,200 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $15,000
6. Conceptual design and
cost estimate for
recommended configuration
$20,400 $3,600 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $24,000
7. Economic and financial $10,200 $1,800 City / APICDA Matching $12,000
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
analysis funds (cash)
8. Conceptual business and
operations plan with electric
rate pro formas
$6,800 $1,200 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $8,000
9. Draft Report and
Recommendations $16,200 $2,800 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $19,000
10. Final Report $4,900 $1,100 City / APICDA Matching
funds (cash) $6,000
TOTALS $187,000 $33,000 $220,000
Budget Categories:
Direct Labor & Benefits $ $ $
Travel & Per Diem $ $ $
Equipment $ $ $
Materials & Supplies $ $ $
Contractual Services $187,000 $33,000 $220,000
Construction Services $ $ $
Other $ $ $
TOTALS $ $ $
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
3.2.3 Cost Justification
Indicate the source(s) of the cost estimates used for the project budget.
The budget for the feasibility and conceptual design phase is based on cost proposals from the
City of False Pass and its consulting team.
The cost estimate for the design/permitting phase is an estimate provided by Polarconsult. This
budget will be revised at the conclusion of the feasibility study to reflect information obtained
during the study.
The cost estimate for construction is a preliminary estimate provided by Polarconsult. The
estimate is based on recent construction cost experience (on $ per kW basis) for small remote
hydroelectric projects in Alaska and the preliminary estimated size of the hydro project at Unga
Man’s Creek. This preliminary estimate will be revised at the conclusion of the feasibility study
phase and design/permitting phase of the project as more detailed information becomes
available
3.2.4 Funding Sources
Indicate the funding sources for the phase(s) of the project applied for in this funding request.
Grant funds requested in this application $187,000
Cash match to be provided $ 33,000
In-kind match to be provided $
Total costs for project phase(s) covered in application (sum of above) $220,000
3.2.5 Total Project Costs
Indicate the anticipated total cost by phase of the project (including all funding sources). Use
actual costs for completed phases.
Reconnaissance $21,500
Feasibility and Conceptual Design $220,000
Final Design and Permitting $380,000
Construction $4,000,000
Total Project Costs (sum of above) $4,621,500
3.2.6 Operating and Maintenance Costs
O&M costs can be estimated in two ways for the standard application. Most proposed RE
projects will fall under Option 1 because the new resource will not allow for diesel generation to
be turned off. Some projects may allow for diesel generation to be turned off for periods of time;
these projects should choose Option 2 for estimating O&M.
Options O&M Impact of proposed RE project
Option 1: Diesel generation ON
For projects that do not result in shutting down
diesel generation there is assumed to be no
impact on the base case O&M. Please indicate
the estimated annual O&M cost associated with
the proposed renewable project.
$NA – project will run diesels off most of time.
Option 2: Diesel generation OFF
For projects that will result in shutting down
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
diesel generation please estimate:
1. Annual non-fuel savings of shutting off
diesel generation
2. Estimated hours that diesel generation
will be off per year.
3. Annual O&M costs associated with the
proposed renewable project.
1. $143,000 per year.
Based on AEA model of $26.5 cents per kWh.
Preliminary estimate covers reduced usage of
consumables (lube oil, filters, etc.) and
increased time between engine overhauls due
to decreased diesel engine run-time.
2. Hours diesel OFF/year: 6,395 hours off/yr
3. $45,000 per year (per AEA criteria of 1% of
project CapEx)
3.3 Project Communications
Criteria: Stage 2-1.C: The applicant’s communications plan, including monitoring and reporting,
is described in adequate detail.
Describe how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status.
The Project Manager—Polar Consult under the direction of the City of False Pass (Chris
Emrich) – the grantee, and the Project Team (City of False Pass, APICDA, Aleutian East
Borough, False Pass Tribal Council and Polar Consult) will report on the Project’s performance.
All members of the Project Team have an established working relationship with each other as
well as with AEA and will continue best efforts to maintain communications. City of False Pass
project management practices are geared towards carefully monitoring scope, schedule and
budget to ensure the Project is tracking as planned. Any significant changes to any aspect of
the Project will be reported promptly to AEA.
To ensure that the Project Team and AEA are thoroughly informed on the Project’s progress,
the City of False Pass will develop a project management plan. The City of False Pass will hold
monthly, and more frequently when needed, meetings with the Project Team to provide updates
with the project manager, contractors, and key City of False Pass personnel, which is the
standard procedure for other state- and federally-funded projects.
The Project Manager will submit regular quarterly progress reports to AEA after the City of False
Pass’s review and approval. The Project Team will schedule meetings with AEA as necessary
or as requested to update AEA on the Project. Any significant changes to any aspect of the
Project will be reported promptly to AEA.
If the Project falls behind, the Project Team will inform AEA and propose solutions for managing
any problems and correcting schedule lapses.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
3.4 Operational Logistics
Criteria: Stage 2-1.D: Logistical, business, and financial arrangements for operating and
maintaining the project throughout its lifetime and selling energy from the completed project are
reasonable and described in adequate detail.
Describe the anticipated logistical, business, and financial arrangements for operating and
maintaining the project throughout its lifetime and selling energy from the completed project.
The Project will be owned and operated by the City of False Pass. The Project Team will work
collaboratively to ensure the City’s participation in the development of the project from early
stages as well as to develop the City’s capacity to maintain the Project in the long term. Polar
Consult with extensive experience in hydropower energy project deployment and operations,
will be the key project partner in this phase of the project.
As the owner and operator of the Project, the City of False Pass will realize financial benefit by
reduced dependence on diesel fuel manifesting itself in lower annual diesel fuel purchases and
stabilized costs of energy for the community. The City of False Pass will also increase cash flow
through the sale of power to the BPS plant and other commercial customers without the
associated cost of fuel for diesel powered generation. This revenue will be used to offset
ongoing operations and maintenance of the Project.
SECTION 4 – QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
4.1 Project Team
Criteria: Stage 2-2.A: The Applicant, partners, and/or contractors have sufficient knowledge and
experience to successfully complete and operate the project. If the applicant has not yet chosen
a contractor to complete the work, qualifications and experience points will be based on the
applicant’s capacity to successfully select contractors and manage complex contracts.
Criteria: Stage 2-2.B: The project team has staffing, time, and other resources to successfully
complete and operate the project.
Criteria: Stage 2-2.C: The project team is able to understand and address technical, economic,
and environmental barriers to successful project completion and operation.
Criteria: Stage 2-2.D: The project team has positive past grant experience.
4.1.1 Project Manager
Indicate who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include contact information, and a
resume. In the electronic submittal, please submit resumes as separate PDFs if the applicant
would like those excluded from the web posting of this application. If the applicant does not
have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management support. If the
applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state
that in this section.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
The City of False Pass has entered into an MOU with Polar Consult and has selected Joel
Groves, PE, Polar Consult as project manager. Mike Dahl, PE will serve as an assistant project
manager and will be kept current on project status and work items.
Joel Groves, P.E.
Project Manager
1503 West 33rd Avenue Suite 310
Anchorage, AK 99503
907-258-2420 x204
joel@polarconsult.net
Joel Groves will serve as project manager and will report to the City of False Pass under the
direction of Chris Emrich. Mr. Groves will be responsible for managing the feasibility study,
including direction of subcontractors and coordinating field activities with the City to maximize
opportunities for local labor to assist in field work. Polar Consult will provide monthly progress
reports to the City on project status, including interim deliverables on project work tasks and
updated budget and schedule status.
4.1.2 Expertise and Resources
Describe the project team including the applicant, partners, and contractors. Provide sufficient
detail for reviewers to evaluate:
• the extent to which the team has sufficient knowledge and experience to successfully
complete and operate the project;
• whether the project team has staffing, time, and other resources to successfully
complete and operate the project;
• how well the project team is able to understand and address technical, economic, and
environmental barriers to successful project completion and operation.
If contractors have not been selected to complete the work, provide reviewers with sufficient
detail to understand the applicant’s capacity to successfully select contractors and manage
complex contracts. Include brief resumes for known key personnel and contractors as an
attachment to your application. In the electronic submittal, please submit resumes as separate
PDFs if the applicant would like those excluded from the web posting of this application
Resumes and Contact Information of Project Partners are attached as Appendix B in a separate
PDF:
The project team includes the following entities (roles):
- City of False Pass (Applicant)
- APICDA (matching funds, local support)
- Polarconsult (technical and engineering consultant)
- Living Systems Design, LLC (regulatory and environmental consultant)
- Marsh Creek (utility load monitoring)
City of False Pass
The City of False Pass, located within the boundaries of the Aleutians East Borough, will serve
as Business Point of Contact for this Project, under the direction of Chris Emrich, City Clerk.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
The City is eligible to receive funding through AEA’s grant program, and the False Pass City
Council has signed a resolution (16-03) supporting the submittal of this application on
September 15, 2015 (see Appendix A).
Aleutian Pribilof Islands Community Development Association (APICDA)
APICDA is a 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organization incorporated in the State of Alaska to develop the
commercial and sport fishing industry for the long term social and economic viability of
communities in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands. It is one of several organizations in the
Aleutians working to reduce dependence on fossil fuels by exploring alternate energy sources
and increasing efficiencies of fish processing operations. APICDA will provide a cash match for
the project of $16,500 (letter of commitment attached in Appendix C) and in-kind staff and field
support.
Polarconsult Alaska, Inc.
Polarconsult is a full-service engineering consulting firm based in Anchorage. One of
Polarconsult’s core areas of expertise is small hydropower systems, Polarconsult has been
involved in all phases of study, permitting, design, construction and operation of small hydro
projects across Alaska. Over the past 30 years, Polarconsult has worked on more than 30
existing or proposed hydro projects in Alaska. Recently completed projects designed and
permitted by Polarconsult include the Pelican Creek upgrades in Pelican (2010), Chuniisax
Creek project in Atka (2012) and the Packer’s Creek project in Chignik Lagoon (2015). Indian
River hydro in Tenakee Springs is currently in construction.
Living Systems Design, LLC
Has been providing Environmental Consultation services in Alaska for 15 years. Numerous
research, restoration and environmental compliance projects have been completed during this
time period including reconnaissance investigations for hydro-power potential at Elfin Cove,
Kake and False Pass, AK. Living Systems Design also participated in a start to finish
hydroelectric project in Gustavus, Alaska that included field reconnaissance, permitting, the
development of an Environmental Impact Statement, acquisition of the FERC license necessary
for construction and operation, environmental compliance during construction and subsequent
biotic monitoring during the initial years of operation.
Marsh Creek, LLC
Marsh Creek, LLC (Marsh Creek), is an Alaska Native Company jointly owned by Kaktovik
Inupiat Corporation and SolstenXP. They employ a wide range of craft laborers, specialized
technicians, construction personnel, and scientific and engineering professionals. Marsh Creek
maintains general contractor, electrical contractor, environmental engineering, and civil
engineering licenses, and provides a wide range of client-focused services in three primary
areas; Environmental Construction, Energy Systems, and Telecommunications. Marsh Creek
recently completed all the power electronics in an OPRC led hydrokinetic project in Igiugig.
4.1.3 Project Accountant(s)
Indicate who will be performing the accounting of this project for the grantee and include a
resume. In the electronic submittal, please submit resumes as separate PDFs if the applicant
would like those excluded from the web posting of this application. If the applicant does not
have a project accountant indicate how you intend to solicit financial accounting support.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
The City of False Pass, the Grantee, will perform the accounting under the direction of Chris
Emrich, City Clerk
907-548-2319
cityoffalsepass@ak.net
4.1.4 Financial Accounting System
Describe the controls that will be utilized to ensure that only costs that are reasonable, ordinary
and necessary will be allocated to this project. Also discuss the controls in place that will
ensure that no expenses for overhead or any other unallowable costs will be requested for
reimbursement from the Renewable Energy Fund Grant Program.
The City of False Pass uses QuickBooks Pro for all accounting purposes. All expenditures are
classed to differentiate various revenue/expenditures by the various projects/departments. The
City Council of False Pass reviews an updated P&L comparison to the budget, at all council
meetings and includes bank statements. All expenditures are done with the signature of two
council members.
4.2 Local Workforce
Criteria: Stage 2-2.E: The project uses local labor and trains a local labor workforce.
Describe how the project will use local labor or train a local labor workforce.
This Project will contribute to the local economy by providing local employment opportunities as
well as business enhancement. These local jobs will have substantial multiplier effects in a
small economy such as that in False Pass.
During the reconnaissance study, local False Pass residents assisted with field reconnaissance
and community outreach, and were trained on measuring stream flow and downloading the
stream gauging data loggers. These individuals will continue to periodically measure stream
flow and stage and download the loggers.
During the feasibility study, local False Pass residents will again assist as appropriate with field
activities and community outreach, and will continue to assist with the hydrology study.
Local False Pass residents have construction experience, and the city may consider use of
force account for all or portions of project construction. Force account construction techniques
results in a more sustainable project as the people involved in the construction are those that
will maintain the project in future years and will benefit from its continued operation. By being
involved in construction, locals will be better able to maintain, operate, and repair the project for
the long-term.
If construction is contracted, contractors would be encouraged to use local hire.
In future phases we may work with Dr. Vladimir Leonov from Marsh Creek LLC to install sensors
for his Power Dashboard (PD) software to gather all necessary data to design appropriate
controls for the hybrid power plant. According to Dr. Leonov, the Power Dashboard can be
used to train personnel and for resource planning, remote troubleshooting and reporting. A
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
laptop computer with the program can be installed in the school or a community office. Any
user can view all the data being collected and see the community’s energy profile graphed in
real time. Utility staff, students and the community as a whole could have access to this
computer.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
SECTION 5 – TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
5.1 Resource Availability
Criteria: Stage 2-3.A: The renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis, and
project permits and other authorizations can reasonably be obtained.
5.1.1 Proposed Energy Resource
Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available, including average
resource availability on an annual basis. Describe the pros and cons of your proposed energy
resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project.
For pre-construction applications, describe the resource to the extent known. For design and
permitting or construction projects, please provide feasibility documents, design documents, and
permitting documents (if applicable) as attachments to this application.
The proposed energy resource is Unga Man Creek, located approximately one mile north of
False Pass. The proposed system would be a run-of-river hydro with approximately 200 feet of
gross head. Preliminary estimated design parameters are:
Diversion elevation: 250 feet. Basin area above the proposed diversion site is approximately
3.14 square miles.
Powerhouse elevation: 50 feet, adjacent to city landfill. Existing road to powerhouse site.
Gross head: approximately 200 feet.
Powerhouse technology: Crossflow turbine with variable 1/3 and 2/3 flow inlet vanes, operating
range from 10% to 100% of design flow.
Penstock: approximately 4,600 ft of 20-inch diameter pipe.
Design flow: 5 to 15 cfs (12 cfs assumed)
Net Operating Head at Design Flow: Approximately 180 feet.
Installed capacity: Approximately 125 kWCapacity Factor: 86%
Power Line: approximately 3,000 feet to tie into existing utility distribution system.
Annual Energy Generation: 936,000 kWh
Utility Load Supplied by Hydro: 540,000 kWh (86%)
Existing hydrology data is very scarce in the Aleutians, so hydrology for Unga Man Creek is
poorly defined. The City installed stream gauges in the Creek in August 2015 to begin
collecting hydrology data, and will be periodically measuring flow to develop rating curves for
the gauging stations. These gauges will help define the hydrology in Unga Man Creek and
potential project design flows.
The reconnaissance study (attached as Appendix D) included a survey of regional hydrology
data and formed a preliminary conclusion that the hydrology of Unga Man Creek may be similar
to that of Russell Creek in Cold Bay (USGS 15297610), which has a 25-year hydrology record.
The preliminary estimated project design parameters and performance estimates listed above
are based on this assumption.
Pros and Cons of Project versus other Alternatives:
While energy conservation efforts could always improve, the average residential customer in
False Pass uses only 230kwh/month in electricity, and only minimal incremental reductions in
electricity use could be expected. The community has taken a very comprehensive approach to
assessing other alternatives to diesel generated electricity, looking at both wind and ocean
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
power options. A recent wind feasibility report completed in 2015 (Attached as Appendix E)
concluded that the turbulent local wind regime presented development barriers for commercially
viable turbines, and that instead the community should be exploring local hydro and ocean
power alternatives. The report recommended an examination of Unga Man Creek (although
referred to it as an unnamed creek in the report).
The community continues to support ocean power exploration. Significant preparation for the
False Pass Tidal Energy Project has been completed. In 2008 and 2010, two AEA-funded
studies confirmed the need to formally study the area’s potential for tidal power. In 2012, a
DOE-funded study concluded that “a tidal energy project could be provided to the City of False
Pass at a rate at or below the cost of diesel generated electricity and sold to commercial
customers at rates competitive with current market rates, providing a stable, flat priced,
environmentally sound alternative to the diesel generation currently utilized for energy in the
community.” AEA also provided programmatic funding to support a bathymetric survey that was
completed in 2013 as well as additional circulation modeling currently underway at the
University of Alaska Anchorage. ORPC performed a reconnaissance tidal current survey to
obtain a preliminary assessment of the potential for a tidal energy project as an energy
alternative for the City of FalsePass in 2012 As next steps, prior to construction of a Tidal
energy system, AEA recommended, but did not fund, the City of False Pass’s request for Phase
II Feasibility Study. In 2014 a Round VIII REF Application was sent to AEA, it was not
recommended for funding.
5.1.2 Permits
Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address
outstanding permit issues.
List of applicable permits
Anticipated permitting timeline
Identify and describe potential barriers
The feasibility study will include a permitting and regulatory analysis to more fully define the
permits required and potential permitting barriers to the project. Project permitting typically
takes approximately 1 to 3 years but can take longer if the project is under FERC jurisdiction.
Anticipated major permits include:
- Jurisdictional determination from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- Fish Habitat Permit from Alaska Department of Fish and Game
- Water Use Permit / Water Rights from Alaska Department of Natural Resources
- Wetlands Permit from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (General or Nationwide #17, #39, etc.)
- Storm water permits during construction (SWPPP or WQCP as appropriate to scope of work)
Pink salmon are present in Unga Man’s Creek and are a potential barrier to project
development. A key task in the feasibility study will be to work with ADFG to understand
existing habitat and utilization of the creek and appropriate development options, including in
stream flow reservations, on-site or off-site mitigation opportunities, or other measures to allow
the project to be developed in a manner that is compatible with existing salmon resources.
5.2 Project Site
Criteria: Stage 2-3.B: A site is available and suitable for the proposed energy system.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Describe the availability of the site and its suitability for the proposed energy system. Identify
potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or
how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues.
Preliminary assessments of the Project site indicate a suitable resource for hydro energy
development. Land ownership concerns should be minimal, with the entirety of the project
occurring on Isanotski Corporation Land, the village corporation for False Pass. The Isanotski
Corporation has supplied a Letter of Support for this project (Appendix C) specifically indicating
its willingness to enter into a future land use agreement if the project proves viable.
This project will include additional community engagement activities to identify and minimize any
potential site conflicts. In addition, consultations will be held with state and federal regulators
regarding environmental aspects of the project.
5.3 Project Risk
Criteria: Stage 2-3.C: Project technical and environmental risks are reasonable.
5.3.1 Technical Risk
Describe potential technical risks and how you would address them.
The project uses proven and mature power generation technology with little technical risk.
Reconnaissance review of the project site did not identify any unique geotechnical concerns –
the site is not a steeply incised canyon or located in unusual terrain. The creek through the
project reach travels over alluvium, generally has well defined banks, and does not exhibit any
exposed bedrock or excessive wetland areas. Terrain in the immediate project area is not
overly steep, although there are some significant scour embankments along the north bank of
creek. Project infrastructure can be routed in upland areas on the south side of the creek to
entirely avoid these areas.
Apparent absence of shallow bedrock in the vicinity of the intake site indicates the intake
structure will need to be founded in alluvium. The intake will need to be designed to handle
flood flows in the creek and minimize impoundment depth to avoid loss of water into subsurface
strata beneath the structure. All of these parameters are within design experience of small
Alaska hydro projects. As with all aspects of the project, controlling construction cost will be a
key element of the design process.
While conceptually straightforward, successful integration of hydro controls with existing diesel
controls and switchgear can sometimes be challenging as control contractors must interface
with third party legacy equipment that is not always well documented or fully functional. The
City will avoid this common technical pitfall by carefully inventorying the existing diesel plant
switchgear in the design phase and paying particular attention to the controls specification and
work scope to make sure that the hydro and diesel controls are fully integrated
5.3.2 Environmental Risk
Explain whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will
be addressed:
Threatened or endangered species
Habitat issues
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Wetlands and other protected areas
Archaeological and historical resources
Land development constraints
Telecommunications interference
Aviation considerations
Visual, aesthetics impacts
Identify and describe other potential barriers
Explain whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will
be addressed:
Threatened or endangered species
Habitat issues
Wetlands and other protected areas
Archaeological and historical resources
Land development constraints
Telecommunications interference
Aviation considerations
Visual, aesthetics impacts
Identify and describe other potential barriers
Threatened or Endangered Species
There are a number of ESA listed species that may be found on the lands and in the waters
near False Pass, including: the Aleutian Shield Fern, an endangered species managed by the
USFWS; the Northern Sea Otter and Steller’s Eider, threatened species managed by the
USFWS; and the Steller Sea Lion, Fin Whale, Humpback Whale, Sperm Whale, Blue Whale
and North Pacific Right Whale, endangered species managed by the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS). Little is known about habitat characteristics of the Aleutian shield fern but it is
possible that they occur within the proposed project area. False Pass is within the molting and
winter range of the Stellar Sea Eider but most foraging would occur in the near-shore
environment. There are no known Sea Lion haul outs along the shore of the project area basin.
Habitats for all the marine mammals listed above occur off-shore and with proper design and
environmental compliance, project construction and operation should be negligible.
Other Habitat Issues
The marine and aquatic waters in the False Pass provide Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for a
number of species. In the marine waters the following species occur: Walleye Pollock, Squid,
Skate, Sculpin, Rock Sole, and Northern Rockfish. No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern are
found at the project location. There are no anadromous streams listed in the ADFG
Anadromous Waters Catalog for the project area, however, reconnaissance work on the Unga
Man Creek has documented Pink Salmon spawning activity. Further evaluation and
characterization of anadromous habitat will be required as part of the feasibility study.
Wetlands and other protected areas
It is recommended that a preliminary wetlands jurisdictional determination is completed to
determine the extent of wetlands in the project area. Although the USFWS wetlands database
does not include any mapped wetlands the nearby vicinity, a reconnaissance report for the
proposed project noted a small wetland in the project area and recommended additional field
work and mapping to support a determination. Given the apparent limited extent of wetlands in
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
the area, potential impacts to wetlands could be reduced by adapting the design of project to
avoid wetland areas.
Archeological and historical resources
There are no know Archeological and historical sites in the project area, however, consultation
with the SHPO should occur during the permitting process.
Land development constraints
The land is owned by the Isanotski Corporation and they have indicated support for the project
and that no constraints exist at this time.
Telecommunications interference
There are no telecommunications interferences anticipated on this project.
Aviation considerations
There would likely be no FAA permitting requirements associated with a hydroelectric project.
Visual, aesthetics and other potential barriers
Visual and aesthetic impacts are anticipated to be minimal for the proposed project.
A re-evaluation of environmental issues such as fish habitat, wetlands, archeological, and visual
and/or aesthetic impacts will be conducted as part of the feasibility study.
5.4 Existing and Proposed Energy System
Criteria: Stage 2-3.D: The proposed energy system can reliably produce and deliver energy as
planned.
5.4.1 Basic Configuration of Existing Energy System
Describe the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the
number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation.
The City of False Pass owns and operates a diesel generation plant for approximately 25
residential customers, 13 commercial customers, 11 community structures, 3 federal/state
structures and the harbor. Bering Pacific Seafood, a subsidiary owned by APICDA, owns and
operates a separate diesel generation plant for its processing operations. APICDA purchases
electricity from the city for its bunk house, shop, duplexes and for its construction related
activities during the non-processing months.
Following is information regarding the two power houses:
City of False Pass
Unit 1: 180 kW John Deere with 10,000 hrs (new install September 2014)
Unit 2: 125 kW John Deere with over 44,000 hrs (rebuilt twice)
Unit 3: 175 kW John Deere with over 18,000 hrs (will require rebuild soon)
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Bering Pacific Seafood
Unit 1: 365 kW Caterpillar (C-15) with 2412 hrs (new in 2013)
Unit 2: 350 kW Caterpillar (3406 B) with 9,388 hrs (reconditioned once)
Unit 3: 1250 kW Caterpillar (3512)
The City of False Pass strives to operate its generators to adequately carry the City’s loads
while balancing efficiency and maintenance costs. In 2012 the City’s generation efficiency was
11.24 kWh per gallon of fuel. In 2012, the City’s line loss averaged 14.7% but has decrea sed to
6.2% this summer, likely due to valve replacements on its primary generator.1 In 2013, the
generation efficiency increased to 13.38 kWh per gallons, possibly due to line loss
improvements in 2012.
A new 200,000 gallon tank farm was constructed in 2014 by APICDA to replace an aging
decommissioned system previously operated by Peter Pan Seafoods. The fuel facility serves
the diesel, gasoline and heating oil needs for the community, local fish processing operation and
fishing fleet.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Existing Energy Generation and Usage
a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt2 grid, leave this section blank)
i. Number of generators/boilers/other 3 generators owned and operated by City of False
Pass
ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other (1) John Deere 6090AHM 180 kW g4enerator set
(1) John Deere 6081TF 125 kW generator set
(1) John Deere 6081TF 175 kW generator set
iii. Generator/boilers/other type
iv. Age of generators/boilers/other 5 years old
v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other 12.34 kWh/gallon
vi. Is there operational heat recovery? (Y/N) If yes
estimated annual displaced heating fuel (gallons)
Yes, A heat recovery from the generator
house to the City Shop. Estimated 1200
gallons of stove oil displaced
b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Annual O&M cost for labor $21,440.42
ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor $4,679.00
c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the
Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Electricity [kWh] 672,095
ii. Fuel usage
Diesel [gal] 54,443
Other
iii. Peak Load 145
iv. Average Load 97.51
v. Minimum Load 66
vi. Efficiency 12.34 kw.gallon
vii. Future trends Load expected to grow with added production capacity at BPS to 245 kW
average load
d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable)
i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] Approximately 9,500 gal
ii. Electricity [kWh]
iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu]
iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu]
v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons]
vi. Other
2 The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden Valley Electric
Association, the City of Seward Electric Department, Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage Municipal Light and Power.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
5.4.2 Future Trends
Describe the anticipated energy demand in the community over the life of the project.
The population of the City of False Pass has notably increased over the past two years.
According to a Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, Censes
Review on March 2, 2015, there was a 50% increase in population from 2014 to 2015 from 40-
60. This trend is likely to continue for the next couple of years, as the APICDA owned Bering
Pacific Seafoods has become a year-round seafood processing facility. Future expansion plans
include adding additional staff housing for eight families, as well as a substantial increase in the
size of the bunkhouse.
There is a high energy demand from the processing facility; however, current cost structures in
combination with high peak loads make it more feasible to self-generate electricity than to
purchase power from the City. While Bering Pacific Seafoods currently self generates for its
processing loads, they purchase electricity for the bunk house, shop and staff housing,
accounting for approximately 45% of commercial purchases from the city utility. As hydro-power
proves to lower power costs, there will be increased incentive to purchase power from the City.
As the community population increases from the seafood plant and the harbor is being further
utilized, additional job/business opportunities will be created. An expansion is currently being
planned for the Isanotski Grocery Store and the need for a ship supply store is being discussed
within the community.
5.4.3 Impact on Rates
Briefly explain what if any effect your project will have on electrical rates in the proposed be nefit
area over the life of the project. For PCE eligible communities, please describe the expected
impact would be for both pre and post PCE.
The current rate for Commercial and Federal/State customers is $.36/kWh. Residential and
Community Facility customers pay $.42/kWh. A fuel surcharge, nearly $.28 in the past year,
has been covered by Community Revenue Sharing and APICDA’s Community Dividend.
Although not a part of the actual customer rate, the fuel surcharge added to the customer rates
does reflect the true cost of producing and distributing power.
We anticipate the hydro project to displace 86% of the fuel now used to produce power. If the
City of False Pass has to borrow money for construction – possibly as much as $2 million - with
repayment, interest and depreciation of a $2M loan at 2% interest for 20 years the rates for PCE
customers classes could drop to $.37 /kWh and Commercial and Federal/State customers
would drop to $.33/kWh. At 14% of the current fuel usage, collections at this rate would cover
all costs. The only subsidy required might be for Residential and Community Facility Customers.
With the drop in fuel costs and including the additional non-fuel costs we predict the PCE rate
will drop to just under $.11/kWh – leaving the PCE customers paying a higher rate than before
the hydro. If the utility still wants to keep those customers at the $.1582/kWh rate, they would
only have to utilize about $21,600 rather than the $186,000 now donated as the fuel subsidy.
5.4.4 Proposed System Design
Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location
Optimum installed capacity
Anticipated capacity factor
Anticipated annual generation
Anticipated barriers
Integration plan
Delivery methods
The proposed system is a run-of-river hydroelectric project. The preliminary design consists of:
Diversion elevation: 220 feet. Basin area above the proposed diversion site is approximately
3.14 square miles.
Powerhouse elevation: 20 feet, adjacent to city landfill. Existing road to powerhouse site.
Gross head: approximately 200 feet.
Powerhouse technology: Crossflow turbine with variable 1/3 and 2/3 flow inlet vanes, operating
range from 10% to 100% of design flow.
Penstock: approximately 4,600 ft of 20-inch diameter pipe.
Design flow: 5 to 15 cfs (12 cfs assumed)
Net Operating Head at Design Flow: Approximately 180 feet.
Installed capacity: Approximately 125 kW
Capacity Factor: 86%
Power Line: approximately 3,000 feet to tie into existing utility distribution system.
Annual Energy Generation: 936,000 kWh
Utility Load Supplied by Hydro: 540,000 kWh (86%)
Anticipated barriers: The only potential barrier identified in the reconnaissance study is the
presence of salmon in the proposed bypass reach of Unga Man Creek. Consultations with
ADFG are needed to understand whether these fish constitute a barrier to project development.
The diesel and hydro power plant control systems would be integrated to allow manual and
automated dispatch of hydro and/or diesel generators based on system load and water
availability.
Energy would be delivered to utility customers via a power line extension interconnecting the
hydro powerhouse with the existing utility distribution system.
Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage
(Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels)
a) Proposed renewable capacity (Wind,
Hydro, Biomass, other)
[kW or MMBtu/hr]
125 kW run-of-river hydroelectric
b) Proposed annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable)
i. Electricity [kWh] 936,000 kWh
ii. Heat [MMBtu] NA
c) Proposed annual fuel usage (fill in as applicable)
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] NA
ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu] NA
iii. Wood or pellets [cords, green tons,
dry tons]
NA
iv. Other NA
d) i. Estimate number of hours renewable
will allow powerhouse to turn diesel engines
off (fill in as applicable)
Estimated diesels off 73% of time.
5.4.5 Metering Equipment
Please provide a short narrative, and cost estimate, identifying the metering equipment that will
be used to comply with the operations reporting requirement identified in Section 3.15 of the
Request for Applications.
The hydro plant switchgear would include the capability to meter and record hydro energy
output and provide monthly summary reports and data exports in standard electronic data
formats (.txt, .csv, etc.). Because this will be new switchgear, the incremental cost of including
this functionality in the programming is expected to be negligible. No additional metering
hardware beyond that normally provided in a power plant is necessary to meet this requirement.
Fuel displacement by the project will be estimated based on monthly kWh of utility load supplied
by the hydro and average efficiency for the utility’s diesel plant.
Implementation of automated data flow from the plant controls to an AEA database is possible,
and would require the following:
(1) Internet connection between the hydro or diesel plant, or a telephone modem link, to provide
data connectivity
(2) Specifications on the communication protocols and data format for the automated data flow.
(3) Qualified personnel, or consultant, capable of upgrading the SCADA export settings from
time to time as AEA’s database is upgraded or modified over the ten-year reporting period.
At this time, detailed cost to provide this capability is not available. The principal cost is
expected to be for installation of an internet connection at the hydro or diesel powerhouse. If
specifications of the AEA database input format and communication protocols are provided to
the City before the hydro controls / SCADA system are designed and built, automated data flow
can likely be implemented at minimal incremental cost to the project.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
SECTION 6 – ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY AND BENEFITS
6.1 Economic Feasibility
Criteria: Stage 2-4.A: The project is shown to be economically feasible (net positive savings in
fuel, operation and maintenance, and capital costs over the life of the proposed project).
6.1.1 Economic Benefit
Explain the economic benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people
of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following:
Anticipated annual and lifetime fuel displacement (gallons and dollars)
Anticipated annual and lifetime revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase
Agreement price, RCA tariff, or cost based rate)
Additional incentives (i.e. tax credits)
Additional revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or
programs that might be available)
The economic model used by AEA is available at
http://www.akenergyauthority.org/Programs/Renewable-Energy-Fund/Rounds#round9. This
economic model may be used by applicants but is not required. The final benefit/cost ratio used
will be derived from the AEA model to ensure a level playing field for all applicants. If used,
please submit the model with the application.
The AEA Round 9 Economic Model indicates a Benefit/Cost Ratio for the project of 1.82.
The model with applicant inputs is included with this application.
The electric utility used 54,443 gallons of fuel in its last reporting year of July 1, 2014
through June 30, 2015. The cost of this fuel at the current average price of $3.69/gallon
equals $200,895. The Reconnaissance study’s preliminary estimate is that the hydro
can supply 86% of the utility load, reducing annual fuel usage by 46,821 gallons to
approximately 7,622 gallons, saving $172,770 annually in fuel cost. Over the 50-year
hydro project life, approximately 2,340,000 gallons of fuel would be avoided assuming
flat utility demand. At today’s fuel price the savings would exceed to $8.6 million.
Based on the utility’s proposed tariff of $.37/kWh and $.33/kWh the utility would earn
$21,956, 000 per year or $439,120 over a 20 year period. This estimate could be low,
however, as our goal for low cost power is to bring population back. Our community has
grown enough to bring back a state funded school since incorporating the fuel subsidy to
help lower electric rates. We believe that more residents will return once it becomes
apparent the reasonable electric rates are here to stay.
We are unaware of any tax credits available to this project.
While small hydro is eligible for green tag sales, we have yet to seriously pursue them at
this stage. The price of green tags is currently quite low – in the range of $2/MWh. We
have been told this could change if a carbon tax is ever implemented in the U.S. There
is a possibility that the project could qualify as a Carbon Offset project with Native
Energy. As such, it could be eligible for an upfront payment for all forecasted production
for the life of the project. This payment is to be used to help construct the project. This
is something worth investigating if the feasibility study proves a promising resource.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
6.1.2 Power Purchase/Sale
The power purchase/sale information should include the following:
Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s)
Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range
Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project
Identify the potential power buyer(s)/customer(s) and anticipated power purchase/sales price
range. Indicate the proposed rate of return from the grant-funded project.
Power Customers: The City of False Pass Electric Utility will sell power to all utility
customers in accordance with its tariff. Customers include the Community of False Pass
along with the outside commercial/federal/state customers who do business in the
community. APICDA’s Bering Pacific Seafood’s fish plant purchases power for its
bunkhouse and shop from the City and is responsible for approximately 45% of the total
commercial purchases.
Potential power purchase price: At this time we anticipate selling power at $.33/kWh,
although this may change with inflation by the time the project has been commissioned.
The feasibility study would include an initial business plan to develop projected rates for
the utility with the hydro in operation. A final business plan would be prepared near the
end of the design phase to support rate making and also to be used to secure funding
for project construction.
Proposed rate of return: The city operates the electric utility as a nonprofit utility, so rate
of return is not applicable as any savings will be set aside for maintenance and
translated back to consumers. In recent years, the City has been effectively subsidizing
electric rates through our annual fuel subsidies in order to maintain competitive electric
rates and encourage local economic development.
6.1.3 Public Benefit for Projects with Private Sector Sales
For projects that include sales of power to private sector businesses (sawmills, cruise ships,
mines, etc.), please provide a brief description of the direct and indirect public benefits derived
from the project as well as the private sector benefits and complete the table below. See
section 1.6 in the Request for Applications for more information.
All utility ratepayers in False Pass will be the primary beneficiaries of the power from the hydro
project. The City does not propose any directed energy sales from this project to private sector
entities beyond what it currently sells to metered customers in accordance with its standard
tariff. The local processing plant is a potential market for some of the power from this project,
however at this time it is expected that any sales would occur in accordance with the standard
utility tariff and would not constitute special or directed energy sales. The primary purpose of
the project is to benefit the False Pass community by reducing diesel consumption for electric
generation, providing lower and more stable long term electric rates for the community and
general public.
Renewable energy resource availability (kWh per month) NA
Estimated sales (kWh) NA
Revenue for displacing diesel generation for use at private sector businesses ($) NA
Estimated sales (kWh) NA
Revenue for displacing diesel generation for use by the Alaskan public ($) NA
6.2 Financing Plan
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
Criteria: Stage 2-4.B: The project has an adequate financing plan for completion of the grant-
funded phase and has considered options for financing subsequent phases of the project.
6.2.1 Additional Funds
Identify the source and amount of all additional funds needed to complete the work in the
phase(s) for which REF funding is being applied in this application. Indicate whether these
funds are secured or pending future approvals. Describe the impact, if any, that the timing of
additional funds would have on the ability to proceed with the grant.
The City of False Pass and APICDA have provided Letters of Commitment for a combined in
kind cash match of $33,000 for the feasibility and conceptual design phase of the project. There
are no other funds required for this phase of the project, therefore this phase of the project is not
reliant on other grant/funding entities.
6.2.2 Financing opportunities/limitations
If the proposed project includes final design or construction phases, what are your opportunities
and/or limitations to fund this project with a loan, bonds, or other financing options?
The City of False Pass has the capacity to finance various phases of this project through
conventional loans. The City has reserve funds set aside to help facilitate immediate financing
needs this project has. If it becomes imperative the City could look into issuing bonds or have
the Aleutians East Borough help with bond financing.
6.2.3 Cost Overruns
Describe the plan to cover potential cost increases or shortfalls in funding.
The City does not anticipate significant cost overruns in this phase of the project. However, if
they do occur, the City currently uses State Revenue sharing funds and annual dividends it
receives from APICDA to purchase diesel for the generators. These funds eliminate a surcharge
for diesel prices which could be implemented again and diverted to support cost overruns
The potential for cost overruns in future phases, design/permitting and construction, will be
reduced by reviewing recent past hydro projects and implementing lessons learned to adopt
realistic budgets and avoid pitfalls encountered on these projects.
Cost overruns during the design/permitting phase can likely be absorbed by diverting annual
funds from the on-going diesel surcharge / subsidy program. Such funding allocations would
require council approval.
Cost overruns during construction would be covered by including an appropriate contingency
into the final construction cost estimate and project financing plan. Grant and/or debt
instruments would be sufficient to handle likely cost overruns encountered during construction.
6.2.4 Subsequent Phases
If subsequent phases are required beyond the phases being applied for in this application,
describe the anticipated sources of funding and the likelihood of receipt of those funds.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
The City of False Pass will pursue subsequent phases – Phase III, Final Design and permitting,
and Phase IV, Construction and Commissioning – in following years. Anticipated funding
sources will be US Department of Energy and AEA. The City will also be exploring financing
options with the state and conventional institutions for construction of the project.
Construction could also be funded through debt instruments such as a loan from AEA’s Power
Project Fund, bonds sourced through the Municipal Bond Bank, RUS financing, or other means.
6.3 Other Public Benefit
Criteria: Stage 3-4.C: Other benefits to the Alaska public are demonstrated. Avoided costs alone
will not be presumed to be in the best interest of the public.
Describe the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project. For the
purpose of evaluating this criterion, public benefits are those benefits that would be considered
unique to a given project and not generic to any renewable resource. For example, decreased
greenhouse gas emission, stable pricing of fuel source, won’t be considered under this
category. Some examples of other public benefits include:
The project will result in developing infrastructure (roads, trails, pipes, power lines, etc.) that
can be used for other purposes
The project will result in a direct long-term increase in jobs (operating, supplying fuel, etc.)
The project will solve other problems for the community (waste disposal, food security, etc.)
The project will generate useful information that could be used by the public in other parts of
the state
The project will promote or sustain long-term commercial economic development for the
community
False Pass residents have very limited access to hunting and berry harvesting grounds. There
are approximately three miles of roads within village boundaries. The lower elevations of the
community are covered in thick alder brush and make navigating by foot very challenging. This
project would require approximately 1.5 mile of road construction to the intake site and could
provide residents with significantly improved access to harvesting and recreational
opportunities.
In addition to associated benefits of economic development and job creation in the community,
other economic developments and benefits could result from the project. The project would
supply some of its energy to commercial users, such as the Bering Pacific Seafood plant. BPS
would benefit from being able to advertise its efforts at lowering its carbon footprint, which would
give a value added green label to its product and provide a multiplier effect for locally produced
seafood.
False Pass has limited suitable land for development due to our rugged topography. The power
line extension to the powerhouse site will support future development of land located along the
road to the landfill site and in the vicinity of the landfill. Also, the project access r oad to the
intake will support potential future development of village corporation lands located in the Unga
Man Creek valley.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
SECTION 7 – SUSTAINABILITY
Describe your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable throughout
its economic life.
Include at a minimum:
Capability of the Applicant to demonstrate the capacity, both administratively and financially,
to provide for the long-term operation and maintenance of the proposed project
Is the Applicant current on all loans and required reporting to state and federal agencies?
Likelihood of the resource being available over the life of the project
Likelihood of a sufficient market for energy produced over the life of the project
The City of False Pass will be the owner and operator of the project and will be responsible for
installation, operation and maintenance of the project and would sell the power produced at a
rate that is competitive with diesel generation and provides adequate cash flow to perform
operations, maintenance, and monitoring and to service any debt incurred in the installation of
the project.
The long term operational costs associated with this project will include yearly maintenance,
environmental and project monitoring, and project management costs. The City of False Pass
and Bering Pacific Seafood’s will continue to operate and maintain their diesel electric
generation facilities, as these will be required to provide power during periods of low water flow
and to make up the power differential when the hydro produced power does not meet the
demand of the community.
The City of False Pass has a very strong track record for timely and accurate reporting of
project operations during and after grant administration, The City is supported by an
experienced staff that will be able to manage both operational and financial performance of the
system.
SECTION 8 – PROJECT READINESS
Describe what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed
with work once your grant is approved.
Specifically address your progress towards or readiness to begin, at a minimum, the following:
The phase(s) that must be completed prior to beginning the phase(s) proposed in this
application
The phase(s) proposed in this application
Obtaining all necessary permits
Securing land access and use for the project
Procuring all necessary equipment and materials
The City worked with APICDA to complete a reconnaissance study of the project site and other
local hydropower resources in 2015. This study identified the Unga Man Creek basin as the
most promising hydropower resource for the city. In August 2015, the City installed stream
gauges in Unga Man Creek at the landfill road bridge (lower bypass reach) and near the
proposed diversion site to begin characterizing the local hydrology, and will continue with flow
and stage measurements during the coming months to develop a rating curve at both stations.
This data will be very important for the feasibility study to evaluate potential project
configurations and requirements to accommodate aquatic resources in the creek.
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
The City already has a qualified, experienced, and proven team ready to proceed with the
feasibility study if our grant request is approved and funded. The City has a positive working
relationship with APICDA, and worked with APICDA and Living Systems Design, LLC during the
reconnaissance study coordinating efforts on field reconnaissance and preliminary
environmental assessments. We have identified Polarconsult Alaska, Inc. as our technical /
engineering consultant for the feasibility study. Polarconsult has extensive experience working
in southwest Alaska and the Aleutians, including recent successful experience on the recently
completed hydro projects in Atka and Chignik Lagoon. Polarconsult also has good prior working
relationships with Living Systems Design, LLC and APICDA on prior projects.
The city contacted the regional Habitat Division of ADFG prior to conducting stream gauging
and minnow trapping efforts. The City has also received an initial letter of support from the
Isanotksi Corporation for use of the land at the project site.
SECTION 9 – LOCAL SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION
Describe local support and opposition, known or anticipated, for the project. Include letters,
resolutions, or other documentation of local support from the community that would benefit
from this project. The Documentation of support must be dated within one year of the RFA date
of July 8, 2015.
The City of False Pass has received enthusiastic local and regional support for this proposal.
The Project Team will continue their ongoing work with stakeholders and regulatory agencies to
ensure that public interests and environmental concerns are addressed throughout each phase
of the project. Consultation with stakeholders will occur through regular project update mailings
and meetings.
Letters of Support from the following entities are included as Appendix C:
• False Pass Tribal Council
• Aleutians East Borough
• Isanotski Corporation
• Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, Inc.
• Aleutian Pribilof Islands Community Development Association
Southwest Alaska Municipal Conference
SECTION 10 – COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER AWARDS
Identify other grants that may have been previously awarded to the Applicant by the Authority
for this or any other project. Describe the degree you have been able to meet the requirements
of previous grants including project deadlines, reporting, and information requests.
The City of False Pass was awarded the following grants and completed all requisite project
deadlines, reporting, and information requests:
•AEA, False Pass Wind Energy Project, $69,075. Project period: July 1, 2011 – June 30,
2014.
• State of Alaska, Community Development Block Grant, Generator Replacement, $142,500.
Project period: August 1, 2013 – September 30, 2014
Renewable Energy Fund Round IX
Grant Application - Standard Form
AEA 15003
SECTION 11 – LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR PRIOR PHASES
In the space below please provide a list additional documents attached to support completion of
prior phases.
The following reports and memos are attached as Appendix D:
Christensen, Bob, (2015). False Pass Hydroelectric Potential Reconnaissance Report,
(Report No. 20150910
Based on the recommendations of the 2010 Renewable Energy Resource Assessment by
YourCleanEnergy, LLC, and the Regional Energy Plan, the City and APICDA funded a hydro
reconnaissance study in 2015. The reconnaissance study, which recommends pursuit of a
hydro project on Unga Man Creek, is included as an attachment to this proposal
Your Clean Energy, (2014) Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Regional Energy Plan (pp 130-
151)
http://www.aleutiansenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/02/False-Pass.pdf
Baker and Bolling, (2010) Renewable Energy Resource Assessment for the Communities
of Cold Bay, False Pass and Nelson Lagoon (24-41)
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/tribalenergy/pdfs/apia_appx1.pdf
Following the January, 2010, site visit by YourCleanEnergy, it was determined that Unga Man's
Creek, located to the west of False Pass's new landfill, and Waterfall Creek, located to the
southwest of the runway, may be viable sources of hydropower. Both creeks are located on land
owned by the Isanotski Corporation, False Pass's Native Corporation, who is interested in
developing hydropower on their land. According to locals both creeks are non-anadromous.
AEA Project File, (Feb 2015) False Pass Hydro Review
Golder Associates, (2014) Geotechnical Reconnaissance for Wind Turbine Feasibility
Final Report.
The proposed powerhouse site is the same as a previously proposed wind turbine site near the
community landfill. A geotechnical report completed in 2014 for the wind project may provide
useful geotechnical design data for the powerhouse, and is included as an attachment to this
proposal.
SECTION 12 – LIST OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED FOR
CONSIDERATION
In the space below please provide a list of additional information submitted for consideration.
Attached as Appendix E:
Marsh Creek LLC (2015) False Pass Wind Energy Feasibility Report
Report recommended that the City of False Pass de-emphasize wind energy development and
that the City of False Pass consider developing a small run-of-the-river type hydroelectric
project on the unnamed (Unga Man) creek near the former met tower site.
Vaught, Douglas (2012) False Pass Wind Resource Report
aLiving Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
False Pass Hydroelectric Potential
2015 Reconnaissance Report
Prepared for the City of False Pass &
The Aleutian Pribilof Islands Community Development Association (APICDA)
by: Bob Christensen of Living Systems Design
20150910
Cover 2. Newly installed stream gage at Unga Man Creek bridge
Cover 1. Unga Man Creek seen from north valley Wall
iLiving Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
List of Figures .......................................................................................................ii
Background ..........................................................................................................1
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................1
False Pass, Alaska .............................................................................................................................................1
Current Electrical Generation ......................................................................................................................1
Previous Reports .............................................................................................................................................2
Field Reconnaissance Site Selection .........................................................................................................2
Waterfall Creek ....................................................................................................3
Location & Land Status..................................................................................................................................3
Geology ..............................................................................................................................................................3
Hydrology ..........................................................................................................................................................3
Fish & Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................................3
Waterfall Creek Summary .............................................................................................................................4
Unga Man Creek...................................................................................................4
Location & Land Status..................................................................................................................................4
Geology ..............................................................................................................................................................4
Hydrology ..........................................................................................................................................................4
Fish & Wildlife ...................................................................................................................................................5
Unga Man Creek Summary ..........................................................................................................................6
Preliminary Design ..............................................................................................6
Overview ............................................................................................................................................................6
Access ..................................................................................................................................................................6
Intake Site and Penstock ...............................................................................................................................7
Powerhouse Site ..............................................................................................................................................7
Transmission .....................................................................................................................................................7
Cost Estimate ....................................................................................................................................................8
Economic Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................8
Conclusion ............................................................................................................8
Summary ............................................................................................................................................................8
Recommendations .........................................................................................................................................8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iiLiving Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
Cover 1. Unga Man Creek seen from north valley Wall ......................................................................a
Cover 2. Newly installed stream gage at Unga Man Creek bridge .................................................a
Figure 1. The community of False Pass Global Location Map ..........................................................1
Figure 2. Google Earth view of the False Pass Village .........................................................................1
Figure 3. General land status near False Pass, AK. ................................................................................2
Figure 4. False Pass area geology. ..............................................................................................................3
Figure 5. Waterfall Creek seen from 255’ .................................................................................................3
Figure 6. Small cascade and pool in Waterfall Creek ..........................................................................3
Figure 7. View of Unga Man Creek from 204’ .........................................................................................4
Figure 8. View of Unga Man Creek relationship to APICDA plant and town ...............................4
Figure 9. Stream gage installed near bridge over Unga Man Creek ..............................................5
Figure 10. Stream gage installation locations. .......................................................................................5
Figure 11. Minnow trapping just downstream of the bridge ...........................................................5
Figure 12. Panorama of Unga Man Creek ...............................................................................................6
Figure 13. Preliminary design ......................................................................................................................7
Figure 14. Cost estimate table from Polar Consult ...............................................................................8
Figure 15. Preliminary Estimated Performance table from the Polar Consult ............................8
LIST OF FIGURES
Page 1Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
BACKGROUND
INTRODUCTION
Living Systems Design was contracted by the City of False Pass and The Aleutian Pribilof Islands
Community Development Association (APICDA) to install stream gages and develop a reconnais-
sance report for hydro-power options near False Pass, Alaska. A field trip that included City and
APICDA staff was conducted August 24-28 to survey two potential hydro-power sites and install
stream gages in the locations that appeared most feasible for Hydro-power development. This
report summarizes information gathered during this field trip along with additional research con-
ducted for baseline reconnaissance.
FALSE PASS, ALASKA
The community of False Pass is located at the east-
ern edge of the Aleutian island chain (54°49′40″N
163°23′57″W), just across Isanotski Strait from
the Alaskan Peninsula. It is an isolated coastal
village that is only accessible by boat and plane
(primarily through Cold Bay).
The landscape surrounding the community is
mountainous and spectacular in its beauty with
the Bering Sea to the North and the Gulf of Alaska
to the South. The climate is sub-polar maritime
with cool summers and relatively mild winters.
Annual precipitation averages around 30 inches
with 3-5 feet of snow in the winter. Wind and fog
are common. Sea ice has been known to extend into the area in colder winters.
There are approximately 50 year round residents who live in False Pass. Most residents participate
in the commercial and subsistence fishing economies to some degree. These folks are joined in
the summer months by approximately 60 part-time residents who are employed at the APICDA
fish processing plant. Other employment opportunities include local government, the school and a
variety of services.
CURRENT ELECTRICAL GENERATION
Electricity is currently provided by diesel genera-
tors (125 kW, 175 kW and 180 kW units available
depending on load). The village load averages
around 65kW. Bering Sea fish processing plant
produces their own power through diesel gen-
eration as well and their loads average 350 kW.
Energy costs in the village are relatively high,
averaging 71 cents per kWh over the past 5
years. This extremely high rate is typical of ru-
ral Alaskan communities whose primary source
of electricity is diesel generation. The City has
opted to ease the impact of high electric rates on
its residents by providing an annual subsidy of
approximately $150,000 dollars to reduce the cost of diesel used by the power plant. This subsidy
reduces rates to around 42 cents per kWh but limits the communities ability to invest these funds
in beneficial capital improvements and social services. Power Cost Equalization (PCE) subsidizes an
additional 28 cents per kWh for a final cost to residents of approximately 14 cents per kWh.
Figure 1. The community of False Pass is located on
Unimak island, the very first in the Aleutian chain.
Figure 2. Google Earth view of the False Pass Village.
Airport Village
Harbor
Fish
Plant
Roundtop Mt.
Unga Man
Valley
Ferry
Dock
False Pass
Page 2Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
PREVIOUS REPORTS
The community of False Pass has been actively seeking alternative energy solutions to provide
greater energy security to the community and reduce the costs of energy to its residents and
businesses. Hydropower has been noted in most of the reports as potentially feasible. Both wind
and tidal have also been looked at and have provided mixed results in terms of feasibility thus far.
Four reports were reviewed as part of this reconnaissance effort:
• A report was written in 1982 that described hydroelectric generation opportunities near False
Pass as not economically feasible. This is not surprising given that the cost of diesel at that
time was a little over one dollar per gallon. (Reconnaissance Study of Energy Requirements
and Alternatives, 1982)
• A more in depth report from 2010 (Hereinafter “The Baker report”) looked at a number of
communities in the area and summarized options for wind, tidal and hydro in False Pass.
Recommendations from this report were to prioritize wind and hydro first because these
technologies are more mature and straight forward in terms of operation and maintenance.
For hydro, two creeks were looked at: Unga Man Creek and Waterfall Creek. Both sites
were noted by the authors as worth further investigation with an emphasis on establishing
an annual record of flow to determine economic feasibility. (Renewable Energy Resource
Assessment for the Communities of Cold Bay, False Pass, and Nelson Lagoon, 2014)
• A memo to AEA dated February 17, 2015 was reviewed that looked at two design options in the
Unga Man Creek watershed. The author used gaging data from Russel Creek in nearby Cold
Bay to estimate energy availability for two Unga Man Creek options at capable of providing
140-150kW. It was recommended to develop a flow record and assess aquatic habitat for this
system as the next logical step in reconnaissance. (False Pass Hydro Review, February 2015).
• An initial study of wind energy was reported on in July of 2015. This report confirmed
observations in previous reconnaissance work on wind power for False Pass and concluded
that the wind resource is difficult to exploit
because of local turbulence.(False Pass Wind
Energy Feasibility Report, 2015).
FIELD RECONNAISSANCE SITE SELECTION
The reports noted above identified a number of lo-
cations for Hydro-power potential near False Pass.
Two of the sites mentioned are located within the
Aleutians Peninsula National Wildlife Refuge. Based
on desk mapping exercises, these sites did not ap-
pear to offer unique power potential and were con-
sidered lower priority options because of the dif-
ficulty expected in obtaining permits necessary for
construction and operation.
Two of the sites noted in previous reports exist on
False Pass Village Corporation land (Isanotski Cor-
poration): Waterfall Creek and Unga Man Creek.
The Isanotski Corporation has expressed interest
in developing power production resources in the
past. Neither of these streams are currently listed
as anadromous in the ADFG Anadromous Waters
Catalog (AWC).
Given these baseline conditions we chose to focus
our reconnaissance field surveys on Waterfall and
Unga Man Creeks.Figure 3. General land status near False Pass, AK.
Page 3Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
WATERFALL CREEK
LOCATION & LAND STATUS
Waterfall Creek cascades to saltwater just .66
miles south of the False Pass airport. The land is
owned by the Isanotski Corporation. The lower
sections of the creek are easily accessible via a
short walk down the beach (at low tide) from the
end of the False Pass airport.
GEOLOGY
Like much of the area surrounding False Pass,
Waterfall Creek basin is mapped as Qv and Qtv,
Quaternary Volcanics (see figure 4). Unlike most
nearby basins, the Waterfall Creek basin appears
to be primarily bedrock in composition. Small
patches of gravel were noted in a few pool tails in
the mainly bedrock control channel type.
HYDROLOGY
Waterfall Creek has a basin area of approximate-
ly .26 square miles that draws from a peak el-
evation of 1,000 feet. A field investigation of Wa-
terfall Creek conducted in support of the Baker
report used the bucket method to record a dis-
charge in January 2010 of .67 cfs. Our field crew
also used the bucket method and recorded a flow
of approximately .29 cfs on 20150924. Based on
the complete lack of snow pack available to pro-
vide runoff during our field investigation it ap-
pears likely that Waterfall Creek is at least par-
tially spring-fed.
FISH & WILDLIFE
Waterfall Creek is not mapped as an anadromous
stream in the AWC. Our site survey confirmed a
barrier to fish passage (the falls) is a certainty at
the intertidal zone. It is possible that the stream
contains resident fish but we did not trap the
stream to make a determination. Our foot sur-
veys found spawning substrate and pool habitat
for potential resident fish to be extremely limited.
The area surrounding Waterfall Creek is covered
by Salmonberry thickets and alder shrubland
patches. A variety of birds and mammals like-
ly use the area as foraging and cover habitat.
Although impacts from construction and plant
operation would be associated with developing
Hydro-power at this site it is not believed that
they would be significant enough to require miti-
gatory action with proper environmental design.
Figure 4. False Pass area geology.
Figure 5. Waterfall Creek seen from 255’ elevation
above sea level.
Figure 6. Small cascade and pool in Waterfall Creek.
Unga Man
Waterfall
Page 4Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
WATERFALL CREEK SUMMARY
According to calculations provided in the Baker report, power potential for Waterfall Creek is likely
limited to approximately 2-10 kW. Our investigations confirm this range. Given the limited power
potential and potential difficulty in developing access to an intake site through rugged bedrock
topography, we concluded that Waterfall Creek would not be capable of having a significant posi-
tive impact on energy security or costs for the community of False Pass. The site may be suitable
for a small, off-grid development of some kind (e.g. fishing lodge) as long as the system could be
designed without the necessity of road access to the intake structure.
UNGA MAN CREEK
LOCATION & LAND STATUS
Unga Man Creek flows to saltwater 1.2 miles
north of the community False Pass (54°52’23”
N 163°24’54”W), just before the terminus of the
northern portion of the community road system.
The majority of the watershed is owned by the
Isanotski Corporation, with the uppermost por-
tions managed by the Aleutians Peninsula Na-
tional Wildlife Refuge. The lower reaches of the
creek are easily accessible via the road system,
including a bridge with provides access to the
community dump just north of the creek.
GEOLOGY
The Unga Man Creek valley is mapped as Allu-
vial Deposits in the valley bottom and Quater-
nary Volcanics extending from the valley wall to
the surrounding peaks (see figure 4). The main-
stem and primary tributaries remain active allu-
vial channels today. Substrate between the lower
extent of our survey (beginning at the bridge)
and including approximately 1 mile upstream
included sand, gravel, cobble and boulder with
the surveyed reaches dominated by a gravel and
cobble mix and the upper reaches dominated by
cobble and gravel mix. No exposed bedrock was
identified in or near the channel for the entire
survey length.
HYDROLOGY
Unga Man Creek has a basin area of approxi-
mately 3.9 square miles that draws from a peak
elevation of 2,700 feet. A field investigation of
Unga Man Creek conducted in support of the
Baker report used the Drogue method to record
a discharge in January 2010 of approximately 10 cfs. Our field crew used a Global Water Systems
“Flow Probe” to record four manual discharge measurements in Unga Man Creek over the course
of our field survey that ranged from 6.3 cfs to 8.7 cfs. Conversations with a number of local resi-
dents, the historically low snow accumulations from the previous winter and the lack of precipita-
tion preceding the timing of our field trip suggest that the flows we recorded should indicate an
approximate low flow for the watershed during the Summer months.
Figure 7. View of Unga Man Creek watershed taken at
204 feet above sea level.
Figure 8. View of Unga Man Creek relationship to
APICDA fish processing plant and North end of town.
Plant
Town
Page 5Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
A memo assembled by Polar Consult in support of
this reconnaissance report calculated an estimat-
ed annual range of flow from 3 - 25 cfs for Unga
Man Creek based on the USGS record provided
at Russel Creek in nearby Cold Bay (see attach-
ment). It was emphasized in this report that the
flows at Russel Creek provide only a very rough
estimate of flows in the Unga Man watershed but
that these were the best data available for recon-
naissance.
The City and APICDA recognize the importance
of establishing an empirical record of flow for
Unga Man Creek as a critical step in determining
Hydro-power feasibility and upon their initiative
we installed two stream gages to begin that pro-
cess. The first site was located just downstream
of the bridge that crosses Unga Man Creek and
the second site was located approximately .2
miles upstream of the bridge site (see figure 10).
Site selection was fairly challenging because of
the lack of bedrock anywhere within the sur-
veyed channel length and the limited availability
of stable pool features. The size of the substrate
within the channel and the bank full width of the
creek both indicate that annual flows are high at
times. Large Boulders were used for anchoring
both gages (See figure 9). Stainless Hobo Water
Loggers were installed in stilling wells along with
staff gages. Each station also includes its own
barometric correction logger. City of False Pass
staff were trained in using the Global Water Sys-
tems flow probe for manual discharge measure-
ments and they will be doing the field work nec-
essary to establish a rating curve for interpreting
the water logger data.
FISH & WILDLIFE
Unga Man Creek is not mapped as an anadromous
stream in the AWC, however, our site survey en-
countered approximately 1,500 pink salmon over
the course of the surveyed stream length. The
Pinks were noted as attempting to spawn but no
redds were identified. The size of the substrate in
the surveyed length may be prohibitive to much
success for Pink salmon spawning. It is worth
noting that 2015 was a very big Pink salmon year
with the third largest catch ever recorded.
Five minnow traps were set in pools encountered
along the survey length and were baited with
salmon eggs. The traps soaked for five hours and
no juvenile or resident fish were caught.
Figure 9. Stream gage installed near bridge over Unga
Man Creek. Aluminum angle was cut and bolted to a
large boulder and provided a mounting structure for
a stilling well and staff gage.
Figure 10. Stream gage installation locations.
Figure 11. Minnow trapping just downstream of the
bridge. Note spawned out Pink salmon in the back-
ground.
Gage
Gage
Page 6Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
The area surrounding Unga Creek is covered by Salmonberry thickets and alder shrubland patch-
es. A variety of birds and mammals likely use the area as foraging and cover habitat. Although
impacts from construction and plant operation would be associated with developing Hydro-power
at this site it is not believed that they would be significant enough to require mitigatory action with
proper environmental design.
UNGA MAN CREEK SUMMARY
According to calculations provided in the Baker report, power potential for Unga Man Creek may
average 69 kW. Our investigations would suggest that the hydrology of this basin could exceed this
estimate. Much will depend on additional field work to determine the nature of Unga Man Creek’s
aquatic ecology, developing a local record of flow and determining the details of an eventual proj-
ect design. That having been said, the results of previous studies and the field reconnaissance
summarized here suggest that Unga Man Creek could meet the community’s energy demand for
most of the year and provide one of the best options identified for community energy to date.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
OVERVIEW
A run of the river design for Hydro-power appears to be worth further investigation at Unga Man
Creek. A relatively easy to access intake site was identified at 250 feet above sea level, just down-
stream of the confluence of the two major tributaries, that would provide a collection point for the
majority of the flow within the watershed. A powerhouse site could be easily located down slope of
the community dump at approximately 50 feet above sea level. This design would provide a gross
head of 200 feet (see figure 13).
ACCESS
Access to Unga Man Creek appears to be very straight forward. An existing road extends and
crosses the creek and has already been roughed in to the powerhouse site noted above. Access
to the intake site noted in this preliminary design could be constructed over what appears to be
relatively easy road building conditions with limited to no bedrock cutting necessary and a mild
and mostly consistent gradient over alluvial and colluvial deposits. One small wetland area would
need to be crossed and designed for as well as numerous steeper gradient ephemeral streams.
Figure 12. Panorama of Unga Man Creek taken from the North side of the valley looking South across the pre-
liminary design project area described below. Yellow line indicates area surveyed for reconnaissance.
Page 7Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
INTAKE SITE AND PENSTOCK
The intake site identified for this preliminary design was selected at a natural channel narrowing
just down stream of the confluence of the two major tributaries to Unga Man Creek. This site would
provide an access point that would support a penstock route that would rapidly exit the active
floodplain and could be buried in the access road for the rest of its decent to the powerhouse. This
site would necessitate a design that could be anchored in alluvial sediments of cobble and boulder
and may require some channel stabilization upstream to keep high flow events from moving the
channel around the intake site. This site would also need to be designed to withstand high flow
events and transport relatively large quantities and sizes of bedload. Of all of the infrastructure
included in this preliminary design, the intake structure looks to be the most challenging.
POWERHOUSE SITE
A powerhouse site could be located down-slope of the community dump in a location that would
support easy construction of a tailrace return of the water approximately 20 feet in elevation above
where the creek meets saltwater.
TRANSMISSION
A transmission line from the powerhouse could be run back over the bridge and along the existing
road for approximately 3,000 feet to connect to the community grid.
Figure 13. Preliminary design for Unga Man Creek run of the river Hydro-power project.
Intake
Power-houseRoad & PenstockTransmission
Unga Man Watershed
Page 8Living Systems DesignFalse Pass Hydro Recon: 20150910
COST ESTIMATE
Polar Consult prepared a project performance and design cost estimate memo (see attachment) in
support of a Round 9 Renewable Energy Fund proposal that included estimated costs for feasibility,
design, permitting, and construction shown below.
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Using the estimated costs included above, and the estimate performance show in below, the AEA
Economic Model worksheet was used to develop an input to benefit ratio of 1.82 (see attachment).
CONCLUSION
SUMMARY
Based on the information provided in this reconnaissance effort, a run of the river Hydro-power
project looks to be a viable option for greatly enhancing community energy security and costs.
Working with Polar Consult, a preliminary project design (see attachment) is estimated to support
a design capacity of 125 kW, which would meet approximately 86% of the False Pass Utility load.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In addition to establishing a record of flow using the existing stations, we recommend the instal-
lation of an additional station closer to the prospective intake site included in the preliminary de-
sign. Field measurements of flow indicate it may be possible to access more water further up the
valley because less would be lost to sub-surface flow. We also recommend that additional minnow
trapping, spring beach seining and spawning habitat mapping be performed to better characterize
the aquatic ecology of this stream. Mapping of project area wetlands would provide essential in-
formation in support of final design work and permitting for construction. And finally, geotechnical
surveys could provide important design condition information for the intake site.
Figure 14. Table 4 Cost estimate table from Polar Consult Memo (see attached).
Figure 14. Table 3 “Preliminary Estimated Performance” from the Polar Consult Memo (see attached).