Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAEA RE Fund Round 8 Application - Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Alaska Energy Authority Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Grant Application Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. PO Box 787 Kodiak, AK 99615 www.kodiakelectric.com Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 1 of 36 7/2/14 SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal) Kodiak Electric Association, Inc.   (KEA) Type of Entity: Fiscal Year End: Rural Electric Cooperative December 31  Tax ID # 92‐0010172  Tax Status: ☐ For-profit X Non-profit ☐ Government (check one) Date of last financial statement audit:  December 2013  Mailing Address: Physical Address: PO Box 787 515 East Marine Way  Kodiak, AK  99615 Kodiak, AK  99615  Telephone: Fax: Email: (907) 486‐7700 (907) 486‐7720 dscott@kodiak.coop  1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT / GRANTS MANAGER Name: Title: Darron Scott President/CEO  Mailing Address: PO Box 787  Kodiak, AK  99615  Telephone: Fax:Email: (907) 486‐7707 (907) 486‐7720 dscott@kodiak.coop  1.1.1 APPLICANT ALTERNATE POINTS OF CONTACT Name Telephone:Fax:Email: Alice Job (907) 486‐7708 (907) 486‐7720 ajob@kodiak.coop  Dan Menth (907) 486‐7710 (907) 486‐7720 dmenth@kodiak.coop  Jennifer Richcreek (907) 486‐7704 (907) 486‐7720 jrichcreek@kodiak.coop  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 2 of 36 7/2/14 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your application will be rejected. 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) X An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or ☐ An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or ☐ A local government, or ☐ A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities) 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (continued) Please check as appropriate. X 1.2.2 Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for the project by the applicant’s board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s governing authority is necessary. (Indicate by checking the box) X 1.2.3 As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant agreement (Section 3 of the RFA). (Indicate by checking the box) X 1.2.4 If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the award as identified in the Standard Grant Agreement template at http://www.akenergyauthority.org/REFund8.html. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the application.) (Indicate by checking the box) X 1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant funds for the benefit of the general public. If no please describe the nature of the project and who will be the primary beneficiaries. (Indicate yes by checking the box) Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 3 of 36 7/2/14 SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY This section is intended to be no more than a 2-3 page overview of your project. 2.1 Project Title – (Provide a 4 to 7 word title for your project). Type in space below. Upper Hidden Basin Diversion  2.2 Project Location – Include the physical location of your project and name(s) of the community or communities that will benefit from your project in the subsections below. 2.2.1 Location of Project – Latitude and longitude, street address, or community name. Latitude and longitude coordinates may be obtained from Google Maps by finding you project’s location on the map and then right clicking with the mouse and selecting “What is here? The coordinates will be displayed in the Google search window above the map in a format as follows: 61.195676.-149.898663. If you would like assistance obtaining this information please contact AEA at 907-771-3031. The Upper Hidden Basin Diversion is located east of the Terror Lake reservoir in a remote area of  Kodiak Island, approximately 57⁰ 35’ 37” N; 153⁰ 0’ 59” W.  A location and vicinity map is  provided in Exhibit D.  2.2.2 Community benefiting – Name(s) of the community or communities that will be the beneficiaries of the project. This project will directly benefit the cooperative members of Kodiak Electric Association, Inc.  (KEA).   KEA’s service area includes approximately 5,900 meters in and surrounding the City of  Kodiak, the US Coast Guard Base Support Kodiak, Chiniak, Pasagshak and Port Lions.  A map  depicting KEA’s service area is included in Exhibit D. 2.3 PROJECT TYPE Put X in boxes as appropriate 2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type ☐ Wind ☐ Biomass or Biofuels (excluding heat-only) X Hydro, Including Run of River ☐ Hydrokinetic ☐ Geothermal, Excluding Heat Pumps ☐ Transmission of Renewable Energy ☐ Solar Photovoltaic ☐ Storage of Renewable ☐ Other (Describe) ☐ Small Natural Gas 2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply) Pre-Construction Construction ☐ Reconnaissance X Final Design and Permitting ☐ Feasibility and Conceptual Design ☐ Construction Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 4 of 36 7/2/14 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief one paragraph description of the proposed project. Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. (KEA) is committed to reducing the Kodiak community’s  dependence on diesel fuel by pursuing renewable energy solutions.  Hydropower generated by  the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project is KEA’s primary energy source.  Enhancing water  availability to Terror Lake with a new diversion would allow KEA’s future electrical load growth  to be continually powered with renewable energy.  The Upper Hidden Basin Diversion would  supplement the available water supply for the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility by capturing  additional snow melt and rain in the upper reaches of the Hidden Basin watershed and  conveying it to the existing Terror Lake reservoir.  Structural components for the proposed  project would consist of two dam embankments connected by an approximately 0.4 mile long  channel, an intake structure connected to subterranean tunnel that would run through a  mountain ridge for approximately 1.2 miles, and a gravel road for construction and future  maintenance access.  These diversion components would be a simple, non‐mechanical design  intended for un‐manned water conveyance.  Once the water from the Upper Hidden Basin  diversion flows into the Terror Lake reservoir, the additional hydropower would be generated  from the existing Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project and fed directly into the KEA grid.  This  minimalistic development builds upon the success of KEA’s existing hydropower facility to  provide a continuous supply of renewable energy as the Kodiak community continues to  transition from diesel oil to more efficient and affordable electric energy solutions.    2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT Briefly discuss the financial and public benefits that will result from this project, (such as reduced fuel costs, lower energy costs, local jobs created, etc.)   The benefit of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion is the additional supply of hydropower  resources to KEA’s existing wind‐hydro generation system with minimal equipment and  infrastructure.  This diversion is estimated to add 30,000,000 kilowatt‐hours of energy annually  to the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project.  This additional hydro supply would allow KEA to  continue meeting growing loads, power a community‐wide shift in energy consumption from  diesel fuel to renewable electricity, and support Kodiak’s waterfront as the regional processing  hub for Alaska’s seafood industry.  This hydropower diversion project is the most viable and  cost‐effective option for supplying additional renewable energy to KEA’s system for the benefit  of Alaska.    The Pillar Mountain Wind Project and the Third Unit expansion at the Terror Lake Hydroelectric  Facility powerhouse currently provide 99% of KEA’s members’ electricity needs with renewable  wind and hydropower; however KEA continues to experience load growth.  KEA’s typical load  growth is now intensified as the community continues to displace costly diesel fuel with clean,  affordable electricity.  Additionally, Kodiak’s seafood industry is also poised for significant  expansion as Kodiak becomes a regional processing hub for Gulf of Alaska commercial fisheries  which is another major source of load growth.  Now is the time to plan for adding more energy  to KEA’s system so these growing electrical loads will continue to be met with renewable  sources of energy, to avoid reverting back to diesel‐powered generation.  Hydropower projects  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 5 of 36 7/2/14 take a long time to develop, permit and build.   Moving forward with the Upper Hidden Basin  Diversion’s final design and permitting allows KEA to be prepared for Kodiak’s future electrical  demand by 2020.          The estimated annual energy resource provided by this hydro diversion displaces over 2 million  gallons of diesel fuel.  At KEA’s current price for diesel fuel ($3.49 per gallon), this project  provides a direct annual benefit up to $7 million in avoided fuel costs alone.  Considering the 50‐ year life of hydropower projects and a conservative 3% inflation rate for the cost of fuel, this  project can provide a benefit of $984 million just in avoided fuel costs.    KEA is committed to reducing the Kodiak community’s dependence on diesel fuel, and our Vision  remains to endeavor to produce 95% of energy sales with cost effective renewable power  solutions by the year 2020.  KEA’s loads are continuing to grow with routine load growth, on top  of more members switching to electric‐powered heat and local seafood processing plants  expanding their operations; therefore, the amount of renewable energy supply needed to  produce 95% of energy sales will increase considerably.  KEA’s renewable energy vision drives  our community to pursue the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion as the next step for expanding the  available renewable supply to meet our future energy needs.  Enhancing KEA’s wind‐hydro  system with the additional hydro resource of Upper Hidden Basin makes it possible for KEA  members to displace diesel fuel as an energy and heat source in their homes and businesses,  and it supports Kodiak’s economic growth in the global seafood industry.  The energy  independence provided by this cost‐effective power solution is a significant benefit for the  remote island community of Kodiak.  With the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion, Kodiak can  continue to rely on affordable, locally‐generated, clean energy as the foundation for the  community’s quality of life.      2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source of other contributions to the project. This grant application is requesting 50% matching funds for Phase III Final Design and Permitting  of the Hidden Basin Diversion project.  The total cost of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion is  estimated at $50,000,000.  The cost for this phase of the project is estimated at $2,500,000.  KEA  is requesting $1,250,000 in grant funds.          KEA has not secured any other grant funds for this project.  Any grant support for this project  will help offset the cost borne by the KEA membership.  The KEA Board of Directors is aware of  the total project cost as well as the portion of that total cost to finalize the diversion design and  secure the permits needed to build the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project.  The KEA Board of  Directors has expressed their formal endorsement of the project through Resolution 694‐14  Authorization for President/CEO to Represent KEA and Apply for a Renewable Energy Fund Grant  though the Alaska Energy Authority, dated August 28, 2014, attached as  Exhibit C.  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 6 of 36 7/2/14 2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMMARY Include a summary of grant request and your project’s total costs and benefits below. Costs for the Current Phase Covered by this Grant (Summary of funds requested) 2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application $  1,250,000 2.7.2 Cash match to be provided $  1,250,000 2.7.3 In-kind match to be provided $  0 2.7.4 Other grant funds to be provided $  0 2.7.5 Total Costs for Requested Phase of Project (sum of 2.7.1 through 2.7.4) $ 2,500,000 Other items for consideration 2.7.6 Other grant applications not yet approved $  0 Project Costs & Benefits (Summary of total project costs including work to date and future cost estimates to get to a fully operational project) 2.7.7 Total Project Cost Summary from Cost Worksheet, Section 4.4.4, including estimates through construction. $ 50,000,000  2.7.8 Additional Performance Monitoring Equipment not covered by the project but required for the Grant Only applicable to construction phase projects N/A – this is only applicable to  construction phase projects  2.7.9 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) The economic model used by AEA is available at www.akenergyauthority.org/REFund8.html. This economic model may be used by applicants but is not required. Other economic models developed by the applicant may be used, however the final benefit/cost ratio used will be derived from the AEA model to ensure a level playing field for all applicants. $ 1,049,572,336    2.7.10 Other Public Benefit If you can calculate the benefit in terms of dollars please provide that number here and explain how you calculated that number in Section 5 below. $ 1,267,419 annually  SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application. 3.1 Project Manager Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include contact information, a resume and references for the manager(s). In the electronic submittal, please submit resumes as separate PDFs if the applicant would like those excluded from the web posting of this application. If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management support. If the applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section.   Resumes for the KEA staff involved in the management of the project are presented below.  All  KEA employees can be reached at (907) 486‐7700.  Section 1 Applicant Information contains  additional contact information.         Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 7 of 36 7/2/14 Darron Scott, President/CEO  Darron Scott, President/CEO of KEA, will serve as Project Manager for the Upper Hidden Basin  Diversion Project.  Darron earned a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Texas A&M in  1990 and began his career in 1987 as an engineer at Ingersoll‐Rand Pump Group.  He worked his  way up through the ranks and was promoted to production superintendent at Texas Utilities/TU  Electric, a steam production plant in Monahans, Texas.  After nine years with Texas Utilities,  Darron and his wife Carol looked north to Alaska, and Darron was chosen by the KEA Board of  Directors to oversee KEA’s employees and stand‐alone generation, transmission and distribution  electrical grid.  Darron was on board for a year when the State of Alaska divested the Four Dam  Pool projects to the communities they serve.  He was a Director on the Joint Action Agency  governing body for these four hydroelectric projects, and was a driving force in accomplishing  KEA’s long‐term goal of purchasing the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project that produces the  majority of KEA’s power, with ownership finalized in February of 2009.  In 2007, Darron was  instrumental in creating KEA’s vision statement:  KEA shall endeavor to produce 95% of energy  sales with cost effective renewable power solutions by the year 2020, and in bringing this vision  statement to fruition by planning, developing, and building the Pillar Mountain High Penetration  Wind Project in Kodiak that began operation in July 2009, and was successfully doubled in  generating capacity by September 2012 with the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS).  Darron  has been KEA’s President/CEO for the past 14 years and has been recognized as a leader by the  Alaskan utility industry with the Alaska’s Top 40 under 40 Award by the Anchorage Chamber of  Commerce, the Director’s Corporate Stewardship Award, and the Mason Lazelle Achievement  Award by the Alaska Power Association.  He speaks at numerous state, national, and  international conferences to share information KEA has learned through experience with  integrating renewable energy sources to power a remote island grid system.    Jennifer Richcreek, Regulatory Specialist  Jennifer Richcreek is the Regulatory Specialist for KEA, and has been a KEA employee for 8 years.   She secures permits and administers utility‐wide environmental compliance programs including  FERC licensing for the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, air quality, spill prevention, waste  handling, facility construction, land use, and occupational safety.  She is experienced at  assessing applicability and requirements of regulations, developing effective compliance  strategies, and implementing policies and work procedures that ensure compliance with federal,  state and local regulations.  Jennifer has a bachelor’s degree in Earth Sciences from Johns  Hopkins University, a master’s degree in Environmental Soil Science from Oregon State  University, and is certified by the Institute of Professional Environmental Practice as a Qualified  Environmental Professional.  She serves on the Alaska Power Association’s Environmental  Regulatory Committee and the Northwest Public Power Association’s Environmental Task Force,  and is a member of the Alaska Chapter of Air & Waste Management Association and the Alaska  Chapter of the American Planning Association.       Lloyd Shanley, Manager of Power Generation  Lloyd Shanley is the Manager of Power Generation for KEA.  Lloyd joined the KEA team in 2011  from NC Power Systems in Anchorage, Alaska, bringing over 30 years of experience in power  generation and equipment maintenance.  Through the years he has consistently walked his talk  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 8 of 36 7/2/14 as a mechanic, field technician, machine product sales and support liaison and machine product  manager encompassing design, installation and operation.   Lloyd is responsible for the overall  performance and integration of KEA’s power generation facilities and equipment, spanning  diesel, hydro, and wind generation units and for insuring that adequate generation is available  at all times to meet the system load requirement.    Alice Job, Manager of Finance and Administration  Alice Job is the Manager of Finance and Administration for KEA, a position she has held for 11  years.  Alice and her husband Mark relocated to Kodiak in 2003 from Black Hills Electric  Cooperative in Custer, South Dakota, where she was the Manager of Office Services.  Her  background includes 30 years of experience with rural electric cooperatives, numerous NRECA  and USDA financial courses, and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the  University of Alaska Southeast in 2009. Her comprehensive knowledge of accounting, financial  planning, risk management, internal auditing, procurement, and resource allocation, as well as  extensive governmental and financial institution compliance, has firmly established her proven  track record in maximizing the effective and efficient utilization of financial resources.       KEA does not expect project management assistance from AEA or another government entity.  3.2 Project Schedule and Milestones Please fill out the schedule below. Be sure to identify key tasks and decision points in in your project along with estimated start and end dates for each of the milestones and tasks. Please clearly identify the beginning and ending of all phases of your proposed project. Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project, Phase III – Final Design and Permitting  Milestone Tasks Start Date End Date  First Stage Consultation  Prepare & file FERC Pre‐ Application & Stage 1 NEPA  scoping documents  July 2015 December 2015 Host public & agency  meetings   Coordinate consultation  comments & response  Geotechnical Site Survey  Subsurface drill sampling   Geophysical mapping   Geotechnical report  August 2015 December 2015 Environmental Assessment  Field Studies   Conduct field studies as  determined by the first  stage consultation process   Conduct additional geotech  studies to finalize civil  design  January 2016 October 2016  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 9 of 36 7/2/14 Final Engineering Design   Optimize engineering design  according to field study  results & agency  consultation comments   Construction cost estimate  August 2016 December 2016 Second Stage Consultation  Prepare & file Stage 2 NEPA  scoping documents  January 2017 June 2017  Host public & agency  meetings   Coordinate consultation  comments & response  Final FERC Application  Filing   Acquire all necessary  permits & agency approvals  June 2017 December 2017 Prepare & file final FERC  license amendment  application  3.3 Project Resources Describe the personnel, contractors, personnel or firms, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an attachment to your application. KEA has in‐house staff with expertise in FERC licensing and agency consultation.  Additional  support for the environmental aspects of the project is provided by Environmental Resources  Management (ERM).  ERM staff has expertise in hydrologic resource assessment, fishery science,  wetland mapping, and FERC licensing.  The ERM consulting team leader is John Gangemi; his  resume is provided in Exhibit A.  Additional support for the engineering aspects of the projects is  provided by Lachel & Associates in conjunction with Schnabel Engineering and DOWL HKM  (Lachel team).  The Lachel team has expertise in the engineering, design and construction cost  estimating of tunnels, dam embankments, and access roads in remote areas of Alaska.  The  Lachel team leader is Steven Brandon; his resume is also provided in Exhibit A.      KEA is currently contracted with ERM and Lachel for the feasibility analysis and conceptual  design phase of the project, but KEA does not have any partnerships or commitment with any  entities to complete the final engineering design, permitting or construction phases of this  project.  When selecting consulting services, contractors and equipment vendors, KEA will  emphasize the use of local contractors whenever possible.               Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 10 of 36 7/2/14 3.4 Project Communications Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status. Please provide an alternative contact person and their contact information. KEA will follow all provisions outlined by AEA in the Renewable Energy Fund Grant Agreement  and provide monthly updates on the project’s status.  The Authorized Signers Form is provided  on page 35 of 36 of this application.      As project manager, Darron Scott will also provide milestone reports to the Engineering and  Technology Committee of the KEA Board of Directors.  KEA will also provide updates to the  public through KEA’s E‐News found on KEA’s website (http://kodiakelectric.wordpress.com/).   Jennifer Richcreek, KEA’s Regulatory Specialist will serve as the alternate contact for this project.   All KEA employees can be reached at (907) 486‐7700.  Section 1 Applicant Information contains  additional contact information.    3.5 Project Risk Discuss potential problems and how you would address them.   Hydropower is a mature technology for supplying renewable energy.  KEA has successfully  operated the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project for 30 years, and operating a new hydropower  diversion poses minimal risk from a technological and constructability perspective.  The risk in  developing the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion project on schedule lies with the lengthy  permitting process.      Authorizing the construction of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion requires a FERC license  amendment to expand the licensed boundary of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, FERC No  2743.  The amended project boundary would be extended to include a portion of the Upper  Hidden Basin watershed area on state land and a new tunnel conduit crossing onto federal land.   The location of the Terror Lake reservoir and the new subterranean tunnel within the Kodiak  National Wildlife Refuge is expected to generate interest from the resources agencies regarding  multiple uses of the land and the project’s potential impact on wildlife habitat.      KEA already occupies and operates portions of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project on Kodiak  National Wildlife Refuge, and maintains a good working relationship with the Refuge.  KEA will  continue to work diligently with all interested parties to ensure that the public’s interest in this  unique environment is protected.  In accordance with the FERC License Amendment process,  resource agencies, native tribes, and members of the public will be consulted throughout the 3‐ stage consultation and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) scoping process to identify  potential impacts and develop strategies for mitigating those potential impacts so that the  benefits of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion may be achieved for KEA’s renewable energy  vision and Alaska’s goal toward energy independence. Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 11 of 36 7/2/14 3.6 Project Accountant(s) Tell us who will be performing the accounting of this Project for the Grantee and include contact information, a resume and references for the project accountant(s). In the electronic submittal, please submit resumes as separate PDFs if the applicant would like those excluded from the web posting of this application. If the applicant does not have a project accountant indicate how you intend to solicit project management support.   Resumes and references for the KEA staff involved in the accounting of this project are  presented below.  All KEA employees can be reached at (907) 486‐7700.  Section 1 Applicant  Information contains additional contact information.         Alice Job, Manager of Finance and Administration  Alice Job is the Manager of Finance and Administration for KEA, a position she has held for 11  years.  Alice and her husband Mark relocated to Kodiak in 2003 from Black Hills Electric  Cooperative in Custer, South Dakota, where she was the Manager of Office Services.  Her  background includes 30 years of experience with rural electric cooperatives, numerous NRECA  and USDA financial courses, and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the  University of Alaska Southeast in 2009. Her comprehensive knowledge of accounting, financial  planning, risk management, internal auditing, procurement, and resource allocation, as well as  extensive governmental and financial institution compliance, has firmly established her proven  track record in maximizing the effective and efficient utilization of financial resources.      Dan Menth, Controller  Dan Menth is the Controller for KEA, a position he has held for 7 years.  Dan earned a BA degree  in Management from St. Johns University in 1992 and relocated to Colorado to begin his career  in finance with Flight Safety Services Corporation (FSSC).  Dan held numerous positions as he  was promoted up through the ranks during his 13 years at FSSC, including Program Accounting  Manager and New Business Proposal Manager.  Dan relocated to Kodiak in 2007 after accepting  this position with KEA.  Dan’s background includes experience in government accounting,  Defense Contract Auditing Agency process, proposal writing, GAAP, and financial analysis.  He  has also completed NRECA and USDA financial courses and is a graduate from NRECA’s  Management Internship Program at the University of Wisconsin Madison.  He also serves on the  Board of Directors for Alaska Ducks Unlimited as the treasurer.     KEA does not expect project accounting assistance from AEA or another government entity.      3.7 Financial Accounting System Discuss the accounting system that will be used to account for project costs and whom will be the primary user of the accounting system. To monitor the project’s budget, KEA’s accounting system will assign tracking numbers to the  costs associated to the project.  KEA is the primary user of the accounting system.        KEA has established a good track record with AEA in grant accounting processes and will  continue to monitor all project costs to ensure that only appropriate grant expenditures are sent  in for reimbursement. KEA’s accounting system utilizes software from National Information  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 12 of 36 7/2/14 Solutions Cooperative (NISC), a well‐respected and widely used accounting software for electric  utilities.    3.8 Financial Management Controls Discuss the controls that will be utilized to ensure that only costs that are reasonable, ordinary and necessary will be allocated to this project. Also discuss the controls in place that will ensure that no expenses for overhead, or any other unallowable costs will be requested for reimbursement from the Renewable Energy Fund Grant Program.   KEA will assign work order numbers specific to the tasks being performed under the grant.  The  accounting system will then be able to collect and report on grant costs broken out by accounts  payable invoices, general ledger entries, and payroll.  Payroll will also be separated by direct and  indirect costs.  This breakdown ensures no indirect costs are included as allowable grant  expenses and increases the transparency of the reports generated from the software.    The primary users’ of KEA’s accounting system is limited to KEA finance personnel. All entries  into the accounting system must be approved by the Project Manager and then by either the  Manager of Finance and Administration, or KEA’s Controller.  This approval and review is in  place as a “check and balance” to ensure all accounting information is a valid expense and coded  to the correct task numbers.    KEA has established an excellent reputation and working relationship with AEA over the past  years with the successful award and completion of five separate grant awards.  Grant submittals  have been on time, complete, well organized, and accurate with few exceptions.  As part of  KEA’s yearly external audit, our auditing firm (BDO) has performed Federal and State audits on  all of our grants and found no exceptions or areas of concern.  SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS The level of information will vary according to phase(s) of the project you propose to undertake with grant funds. If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. For pre-construction applications, describe the resource to the extent known. For design and permitting or construction projects, please provide feasibility documents, design documents, and permitting documents (if applicable) as attachments to this application. Terror Lake is the cornerstone to KEA’s renewable wind‐hydro energy generation system.   Hydropower is a unique form of renewable energy in that it is dispatchable base load that can  respond quickly to changes in system demand.  However, there is a limited amount of water  available within the Terror Lake reservoir.  When that available energy supply is drawn down to  low lake levels, more energy is needed on the grid to power KEA’s growing loads.  KEA’s future  load demand is expected to grow as the community continues to transition away from  expensive diesel fuel as their primary source of energy and head toward stably‐priced  renewable electricity as their efficient energy solution.      Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 13 of 36 7/2/14 KEA is already pushing the engineering envelope with 80% wind penetration rates, and more  wind energy cannot be stably integrated onto KEA’s isolated grid system at this time.  Diesel  generation is also able to provide additional energy onto KEA’s grid; however, use of diesel fuel  is counterproductive to KEA’s efforts to expand its use of renewable sources of energy for the  benefit of its members and the State of Alaska.  KEA is striving to eliminate reliance on diesel  fuel as a primary source of energy because of its high cost, both financially and environmentally.   Enhancing the existing Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project with a new diversion that adds more  water to the Terror Lake reservoir would be the most cost‐effective, and minimally‐invasive  approach for adding more renewable energy onto KEA’s isolated grid.      Diverting water from the Hidden Basin watershed was considered during the original design and  construction of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project.  Exhibit E includes an excerpt of the 1978  Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project’s Definite Project Report which states:    “The Hidden Basin Creek diversion works are not included in the recommended  development of the Terror Lake Project at this time [1978].  However, this scheme is the  most economical means of increasing the output of the development above its presently  projected level, and it can be built whenever the growth in power demand in Kodiak  justifies it.  Therefore, the scheme is included in the present report as a recommended  future development.”     By 2017, growth in power demand in Kodiak will justify an increase in the output of the Terror  Lake Hydroelectric Project with the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion.  In order to meet future load  demand in 2020 with renewable energy, KEA must act now to acquire all of the necessary  permits and FERC licensing authorizations required before construction can occur.  Permitting a  new hydropower diversion is a very lengthy, multi‐year process.  In preparation of this  permitting endeavor, KEA is currently engaged in the feasibility and conceptual design phase of  the project.  Stream flow data is being collected in the Upper Hidden Basin Watershed to  confirm the available hydrologic resource for the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility.  An  engineering team is developing a conceptual design and preliminary construction cost estimate.   The final hydrologic resource and engineering reports will be completed in December 2014.  KEA  is unable to provide these feasibility and conceptual design final reports in this grant application  submittal; however, KEA can provide those final reports to AEA when they become available  later this year.   These reports will also be provided to the public as part of the permitting phase  of this project.  While the final reports are not ready yet, observations and data collected to date  indicate very favorable results, and KEA is ready to aggressively pursue this project into its next  phase.      US Geologic Survey (USGS) data for Upper Hidden Basin’s energy resource were used to  calculate the cost‐benefit feasibility analysis.  The USGS monitored a stream gauging station  from 1982 through 1984 directly upstream of the proposed D‐West diversion. Exhibit E provides  the established USGS discharge data record for this stream gauge site.  This USGS surface flow  data is the basis for the 30,000,000 kilowatt‐hour hydropower energy resources used for the  cost‐benefit calculations presented in this application.  As part of the project’s feasibility and  conceptual design phase currently in progress, the flow data and available hydropower energy  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 14 of 36 7/2/14 resource assessment is being refined by ERM with new stream gauges installed closer to the  proposed D‐East and D‐West diversion sites.  Preliminary review of the recently collected flow  data indicates that the magnitude, frequency and duration of the discharge observed at the  diversion sites compares exceptionally well to the USGS data collected 30 years ago.    4.2 Existing Energy System 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation. KEA operates an isolated electrical grid system.  The main power source is the Terror Lake  Hydroelectric Project, which is the generating facility that the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion  would supplement.  KEA’s system configuration is continually being updated with additional  renewable energy generation and energy storage solutions as KEA strives toward its renewable  energy vision.  In 2012, KEA completed the installation of three additional wind turbines on  Pillar Mountain giving a total of 9 megawatts of wind energy on the KEA system, as well as the  BESS with 3 megawatts of energy storage.  The Third Unit expansion project added 10  megawatts of hydropower capacity at the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility in February 2014.   Two 1 megawatt ABB PowerStore Flywheel energy storage units are currently in the process of  being integrated onto KEA’s system with a commissioning date expected in late 2014.    KEA operates and maintains four independent diesel‐powered generation facilities for  emergency backup to its isolated renewable energy system in case the hydroelectric plant is  unavailable.  The diesel‐powered backup units are a mixture of reciprocating internal  combustion engines and a diesel‐fired combined cycle generation unit.  KEA recently retired two  1968 Fairbanks Morse diesel‐powered generators and is in the process of replacing those aging  units with a new Caterpillar reciprocating internal combustion engine at the Swampy Acres  Generation Station.      The table on the following page details KEA’s current generation resources.  The capacity  numbers listed are high‐end nominal values.  The efficiency information is for these load points  at ideal conditions.                            Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 15 of 36 7/2/14 KEA Energy Generation  Type  Efficiency Unit  Installation  Date Capacity  Hydro 1,100 kWh/A‐F Fuji VT1R6N Turbine with Mitsubishi Generator 1984 10.0 MW    1,100 kWh/A‐F Fuji VT1R6N Turbine with Mitsubishi Generator 1984 10.0 MW    1,100 kWh/A‐F 6‐Jet Pelton Turbine with Hyundai Generator 2014 10.0 MW    Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project Total 30.0 MW  Wind N/A GE 1.5 sle Wind Turbine 2009 1.5 MW    N/A GE 1.5 sle Wind Turbine 2009 1.5 MW    N/A GE 1.5 sle Wind Turbine 2009 1.5 MW    N/A GE 1.5 sle Wind Turbine 2012 1.5 MW    N/A GE 1.5 sle Wind Turbine 2012 1.5 MW    N/A GE 1.5 sle Wind Turbine 2012 1.5 MW    Pillar Mountain Wind Project Total 9.0 MW  BESS N/A Containerized Xtreme Power DPR 15‐100C 2012 1.5 MW    N/A Containerized Xtreme Power DPR 15‐100C 2012 1.5 MW    Battery Energy Storage System 3.0 MW  Diesel 12.2 kWh/gal DeLaval DSRS‐12‐3 1976 1.8 MW    15.6 kWh/gal Caterpillar 3616 2005 5.0 MW    15.6 kWh/gal Caterpillar 3616 2005 5.0 MW    14.4 kWh/gal DeLaval DSRS‐16‐4 1980 5.8 MW    Kodiak Generating Station Total 17.6 MW  Diesel 13.8 kWh/gal DeLaval DSR‐48 1978 2.5 MW    14.2 kWh/gal Solar Taurus 60‐T7301S, SoLoNOx 1999 6.5 MW    Nyman Power Plant Total 9.0 MW  Diesel 13.2 kWh/gal Caterpillar 3516B 2002 1.8 MW    13.2 kWh/gal Caterpillar 3516B 2002 1.8 MW    Swampy Acres Generating Plant Total 3.6 MW  Diesel 11.3 kWh/gal Waukesha 28950 1968 0.24 MW    11.5 kWh/gal Waukesha 28950 1979 0.24 MW    11.5 kWh/gal Caterpillar 3406 1970 0.14 MW    11.5 kWh/gal Caterpillar 343 1970 0.14 MW    Port Lions Power Plant Total 0.76 MW  KEA System‐Wide Total Generating Capacity  72.9 MW    KEA owns and operates 34 miles of transmission line, 202 miles of overhead distribution line,  138 miles of underground distribution line, and 3 miles of underwater line. KEA has six  substation facilities as itemized in the table on the following page.            Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 16 of 36 7/2/14 4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources.   The existing energy resources for KEA as itemized in Section 4.2.1 are hydro, wind and diesel  with a battery energy storage system (BESS) to bridge the gap between a drop in wind  production and the pick‐up of hydro production from Terror Lake.  Terror Lake provides the  macro‐scale storage of wind energy on an annual basis, and the BESS provides the short‐term  grid stability to inject power into the KEA grid the moment wind production drops.  Two 1  megawatt ABB PowerStore Flywheel energy storage units are currently in the process of being  integrated onto KEA’s system to provide additional support in KEA’s energy storage system and  provide power to a new electric crane at the City of Kodiak’s rebuilt Pier III.  2013 was a very  successful year in renewable energy production with 95.4% of energy sales generated by hydro  and wind energy, year‐to‐date 2014 KEA has achieved 99.7% renewable energy production.  KEA  strives to continue building upon that success with additional renewable energy solutions that  will optimize the existing infrastructure and KEA’s delivery of renewable energy to more sectors  of the community.      KEA’s electric load demand is growing, and is expected to continue growing as renewable  electricity has become Kodiak’s energy solution.  To meet that growing load without reverting  back to diesel‐powered generation, KEA must grow its renewable energy supply.  KEA is already  pushing the engineering envelope with 80% wind penetration rates, and there is only so much  water currently stored within the Terror Lake reservoir.  The Upper Hidden Basin Diversion is the  most feasible hydropower project available to KEA at this time.  This diversion would have a  positive impact on KEA’s existing energy infrastructure and resources by enhancing the existing  KEA Substation Configuration  Substation Size Voltage  Terror Lake Substation  11.25 MVA 13.8 kV/138 kV  11.25 MVA 13.8 kV/138 kV  11.25 MVA 13.8 kV/138 kV  750 KVA 13.8 kV/12.47 kV  Airport Substation 10 MVA 33 MVA 138 kV/12.47 kV  138 kV/67 kV  Swampy Acres   20 MVA 138 kV/67 kV/12.47 kV  7.5 MVA 67 kV/12.47 winding  7.5 MVA 4.16 kV/67 kV  Hartman Substation 10 MVA 4.16 kV/12.47 kV/67 kV  10 MVA 4.16 kV/12.47 kV/67 kV  10 MVA 67 kV/2.4 kV/12.47 kV  High Substation 5 MVA 67 kV/12.47kV/24.9 kV  5 MVA 67 kV/12.47kV/24.9 kV  Nyman Substation  10 MVA 67 kV/12.47 kV/13.8 kV      Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 17 of 36 7/2/14 Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project.  Adding more water to the existing Terror Lake Hydroelectric  Project would be the most cost‐effective, and minimally‐invasive approach for adding more  renewable energy onto KEA’s isolated grid.  This diversion provides the KEA grid with the energy  it needs to power new heating and seafood processing demand in the community, and this  addition of energy can be achieved through a simple straight‐forward approach that utilizes  existing power generation equipment.  KEA is ready to move forward with this next step in our  renewable energy vision.        4.2.3 Existing Energy Market Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy customers.   KEA is a not‐for‐profit rural electric cooperative utility that generates, transmits and distributes  electricity to approximately 5,900 meters on Kodiak Island in a service area that includes the  region in and around the City of Kodiak, the US Coast Guard Base, Bells Flats, Chiniak, Pasagshak,  and Port Lions.  Hydropower generated from the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project is KEA’s  primary energy source.  KEA is committed to reducing the Kodiak community’s dependence on  diesel fuel by pursuing renewable energy solutions, and adding water to the Terror Lake  reservoir with the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion allows KEA’s future electrical load growth to be  met with clean renewable hydropower.  Thanks to the assistance of AEA through previous  Renewable Energy Fund grants, KEA is continuing to stabilize electric rates with our renewable  energy portfolio, and does not foresee any rate increases in the future.    In 2014, 99.7% of year‐to‐date total megawatts were generated with renewable sources.   KEA’s  membership base consists of 4,700 residential services with an average monthly usage of  approximately 600 kilowatt‐hours.  The entire community of Kodiak is dependent on the fishing  industry, and the seafood processing sector accounts for approximately 25% of KEA’s electric  sales annually.     Current year to date growth in kilowatt‐hour sales is slightly above 2%. As more Kodiak  residences improve the energy efficiency of their homes, a trend is emerging with converting old  petroleum‐based furnaces to new electric‐based systems for space and water heat.  New home  construction in town and on the US Coast Guard Base is installing electric‐based systems for  their water and space heating needs.  It may seem counter‐intuitive that conservation efforts  are creating higher electric loads, but it is because of KEA’s success in providing its members  with affordable renewable electricity, and that electricity makes better overall sense and savings  per BTU than fossil fuels.  In addition to regular system‐wide load growth and the new load  growth associated with new and converted heating systems, KEA has also been notified by its  seafood processing sector accounts that significant capital improvements are underway to  prepare Kodiak’s waterfront as the Gulf of Alaska’s regional seafood processing hub.  Expansions  to the seafood processing plants have a direct and significant impact on KEA’s load demand.      Based on KEA’s updated load forecast analysis (refer to Section 4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet),  KEA can expect to have an excess supply of renewable generation through 2016.  But by 2017,  KEA will need to find new sources of renewable energy to meet the growing loads.  That is less  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 18 of 36 7/2/14 than three years away!  KEA does not want to fall into the same dilemma other Alaskan utilities  have faced when growing loads outpaced the supply of renewable energy.  It can take over five  years for FERC to issue a license amendment authorizing construction of a new hydropower  diversion project.  In order to provide KEA’s members with a continuous supply of renewable  energy to meet all their electric needs KEA must act now to develop the Hidden Basin  Hydropower Diversion.    4.3 Proposed System Describe the system you are intending to develop and address potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues. 4.3.1 System Design Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:  A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location  Optimum installed capacity  Anticipated capacity factor  Anticipated annual generation  Anticipated barriers  Basic integration concept  Delivery methods The Upper Hidden Basin Diversion would supplement Terror Lake’s water supply by adding an  estimated 30,000,000 kilowatt‐hours of additional energy resource to the existing hydropower  facility.  The proposed diversion would capture water in the upper reaches of the Hidden Basin  watershed and convey it through an underground tunnel to the existing Terror Lake reservoir.     A preliminary conceptual layout of the proposed diversion area is provided in Exhibit D.  Two  proposed dam embankments, referred to as D‐West and D‐East, would capture a drainage area  of approximately four square miles.  These diversion sites would be sited on the East and West  Forks of Upper Hidden Basin Creek at an elevation of 1,500 feet.  Structural components for the  proposed project would consist of these two dam embankments connected by an approximately  0.4 mile long channel, an intake structure connected to a subterranean tunnel that would run  through a mountain ridge for approximately 1.2 miles, and a gravel road for construction and  future maintenance access.  The diversion components would be a simple, non‐mechanical  design intended for un‐manned water conveyance.  Once the water from the Upper Hidden  Basin watershed is conveyed over to the Terror Lake reservoir, the additional hydropower would  be generated from the existing Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project and fed directly into the KEA  grid.  KEA’s existing powerhouse and electrical grid infrastructure is able to deliver the  additional power generated with the water from this new diversion without any modifications.    KEA is currently engaged in the feasibility and conceptual design phase of the project.  To  confirm the hydrologic resource data, additional stream flow data is being collected at the  proposed diversion sites to build upon the three years of documented flow data collected by the  USGS.  An engineering team is developing a conceptual design and preliminary construction cost  estimate.  The final hydrologic resource and engineering reports will be completed in December  2014.      Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 19 of 36 7/2/14 KEA is familiar with the ground conditions in this remote area of Kodiak Island.  The proposed  diversion area is adjacent to the existing Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, east of the Terror  Lake reservoir and south of Shotgun Lake Diversion.  The proposed diversion tunnel would run  though the same stable granitic ridge as the Terror Lake power tunnel. Based on KEA’s  familiarity with this region of Kodiak Island and observations from the feasibility analysis phase,  KEA does not anticipate any technological barriers to the development of this project.  KEA will  be ready to proceed with the final design and permitting phase of the project in 2015.      4.3.2 Land Ownership Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues. The proposed Upper Hidden Basin Diversion area is located east of the Terror Lake reservoir on  the other side of a granitic mountain ridge of approximately 3,000’ in elevation.  The land to the  east of the mountain ridge is owned by the State of Alaska and managed by the Alaska  Department of Natural Resources Division of Land, Mining and Water.  The land to the west of  the mountain ridge, where the Terror Lake reservoir is located, is owned by federal government  and managed by the US Fish and Wildlife Kodak National Wildlife Refuge.        As the owner, operator and licensee of the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, KEA has FERC  licensing priority for developing this new diversion as an enhancement to our existing  hydropower facility; therefore, a FERC Preliminary Permit is not necessary for KEA to study and  design this diversion.  Authorizing the construction of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project  will require an amendment to FERC License No. 2743 to expand the licensed boundary of the  Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project.  The amended project boundary would include the upper  areas of the Hidden Basin watershed located on state land, and a tunnel conduit that would  connect this watershed to the Terror Lake reservoir located on federal land.  KEA will work  diligently with all landowners to secure all the necessary permits to access, construct and  operate the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion as part of FERC License No. 2743.  4.3.3 Permits Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address outstanding permit issues.  List of applicable permits  Anticipated permitting timeline  Identify and discuss potential barriers Constructing the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project will require an amendment to KEA’s  existing FERC License No. 2743 for the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project.  As part of the FERC  license amendment and NEPA scoping consultation process, the following permits will likely be  required and acquired:   AK Dept. of Natural Resources Water Rights    AK Dept. of Natural Resources Land Use Permit and/or Right‐of‐Way    AK Dept. of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Permit   US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Permit    Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 20 of 36 7/2/14 This application is specifically requesting grant funds to assist KEA in the final design and  permitting of this new hydropower diversion.  The tasks and timeline anticipated in this  permitting effort are outlined in Section 3.2 Project Schedule and Milestones.      Developing a new hydropower diversion near the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge is expected to  generate interest from the resource agencies regarding the project’s impact on wildlife and  downstream habitat.  KEA will work diligently with all interested parties to ensure that the  public’s interest in this unique environment is protected.  In accordance with the FERC license  amendment process, KEA will consult with the appropriate resource agencies, native tribes, and  members of the public throughout the 3‐stage consultation and NEPA scoping process.  This  consultation process will likely involve field studies to assess the potential impact of the project.   KEA will ensure that all of the necessary permits are acquired before any of the field work in the  area is conducted.    4.3.4 Environmental Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be addressed:  Threatened or endangered species  Habitat issues  Wetlands and other protected areas  Archaeological and historical resources  Land development constraints  Telecommunications interference  Aviation considerations  Visual, aesthetics impacts  Identify and discuss other potential barriers   The proposed Upper Hidden Basin Diversion area is adjacent to the existing Terror Lake  Hydroelectric Project, east of the Terror Lake reservoir and south of Shotgun Lake Diversion.   This remote upland region of Kodiak Island was thoroughly studied when the Terror Lake  Hydroelectric Project was initially developed.  Based on KEA’s familiarity with this region of  Kodiak Island and observations from the feasibility analysis phase, KEA does not anticipate  significant environmental barriers to the development of this project.       The upland streams to be diverted by the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion are not anadromous  waters.  There are wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed project area, which is typical in the  Alaskan landscape.  Protected species and archeological sites found around the Kodiak Island  archipelago typically live in near‐shore habitats, not in these alpine uplands.  This remote  hydropower diversion poses no risk of telecommunication interference or visual constraints.      The FERC license amendment process required to authorize construction of the Upper Hidden  Basin Diversion will include a NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) and stakeholder  consultation process in accordance with 18 CFR 4.38.  Through these extensive evaluations, KEA  will work closely with local, state, and federal resource agencies, native tribes, and members of  the public to identify any potential environmental impacts, and develop approaches to avoid or  mitigate those potential impacts to protected resources.  This process is defined in Section 3.2  Project Schedule and Milestones.      Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 21 of 36 7/2/14 4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues (Total Estimated Costs and Projected Revenues) The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of their cost data. For example: Applicants records or analysis, industry standards, consultant or manufacturer’s estimates. 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the project. Cost information should include the following:  Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase  Requested grant funding  Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind  Identification of other funding sources  Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system  Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system   The project is expected to be constructed in 2020 after the FERC license amendment is issued.   The total anticipated cost of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project in 2020 dollars is  estimated at $50,000,000.  Of this total cost $550,000 is the cost of feasibility analysis and  conceptual design, $2,500,000 is the cost for the final design and permitting.  The cost of  construction is $46,950,000.      In the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project archive files is a letter dated February 27, 1983 from the  construction manager of Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project to Alaska Power Authority outlining  the construction cost for the Hidden Basin Diversion.  A copy of this letter is provided in Exhibit  E.  Ebasco’s cost estimate for constructing the Hidden Basin Diversion was $13,500,000 in 1983  dollars.  That cost estimate is used as KEA’s preliminary baseline for calculating the total  anticipated project cost in 2020 dollars, which when this project is expected to be built.  Based  on a 3% inflation rate and 15% contingency fund, the 1983 project cost estimate is increased to  $50,000,000.  This preliminary construction cost estimate is considered a crude over‐estimation,  but even at this high‐end cost estimate the benefits of the additional hydro resource provided to  Terror Lake far outweigh the alternative of diesel‐powered generation.  A more accurate  construction cost estimate is currently being developed by the Lachel engineering team, and is  expected to be finalized in a report by December 2014.      The cost for the project’s Phase III Final Design and Permitting is $2,500,000.  KEA is requesting a  50‐50% match of $1,250,000 in grant funds.     KEA has not secured any other grant funds for this project.  Any grant support for this project  will help offset the cost borne by the KEA membership.  The KEA Board of Directors is aware of  the total project cost estimate as well as the portion of that total cost to finalize the design and  secure the permits in order to build the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project.  The KEA Board of  Directors has expressed their formal endorsement of the project through Resolution 694‐14  Authorization for President/CEO to Represent KEA and Apply for a Renewable Energy Fund Grant  though the Alaska Energy Authority, dated August 28, 2014, attached as Exhibit C.    Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 22 of 36 7/2/14 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the applicant. (Note: Operational costs are not eligible for grant funds however grantees are required to meet ongoing reporting requirements for the purpose of reporting impacts of projects on the communities they serve.) KEA has been responsible for all the operation and maintenance at the Terror Lake facility since  its inception in 1984.  KEA utilizes specific accounts to monitor the operation and maintenance  (O&M) expenses per facility feature, including the existing tunnel and three other existing  diversion systems:  Falls Creek Diversion, Shotgun Creek Diversion, and Rolling Rock Creek  Diversion.  KEA’s historical O&M cost for the entire Terror Lake facility has been less than 2 cents  per kilowatt‐hour. This project is to provide an additional diversion of water resources to the  current Terror Lake Hydro facility.  KEA does not anticipate significant additional operational  costs at the hydro plant when the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project is constructed.  No  additional personnel will be necessary to operate or maintain the minimalistic diversion  structures at the existing hydropower facility.     KEA is not requesting any grant funds for the operation and maintenance costs associated with  the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project. 4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale The power purchase/sale information should include the following:  Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s)  Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range  Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project   KEA is the only electric utility in Kodiak and there will be no power purchase agreements.  KEA is  a generation, transmission and distribution not‐for‐profit rural electric cooperative. The  additional water diverted from the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project would be used to  generate power at the existing Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project, which goes straight into the  KEA grid for the direct benefit of our Cooperative Member‐Owners.  The community will  continue to experience a stable cost of power from avoiding reliance on diesel fuel consumption  to meet growing loads.    4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in evaluating the project. Please fill out the form provided below. Renewable Energy Source The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis. Annual average resource availability. 30,000,000 kilowatt‐hours   Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomass fuel) Hydropower Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 23 of 36 7/2/14 Existing Energy Generation and Usage a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt1 grid, leave this section blank) i. Number of generators/boilers/other 23  ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 72.9 MW (Detail itemized in Section 4.2.1)  iii. Generator/boilers/ot her type See KEA Energy Generation Table (Section 4.2.1)  iv. Age of generators/boilers/other See KEA Energy Generation Table (Section 4.2.1)  v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other See KEA Energy Generation Table (Section 4.2.1)  b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Annual O&M cost for labor $2,051,491 (all generation sources ‐ wind, water, BESS, diesel)  ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor $2,597,533 (all generation sources – wind, water, BESS, diesel)  c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Electricity [kWh] 151,401,600 (2013 actual)  ii. Fuel usage Diesel [gal] 498,839 (2013 actual)  Other N/A  iii. Peak Load 27.8 MW  iv. Average Load 17 MW  v. Minimum Load 11 MW  vi. Efficiency 14.2 kWh/gal of diesel fuel  1 The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden Valley Electric  Association, the City of Seward Electric Department, Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage Municipal Light and Power.    Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 24 of 36 7/2/14 i. Future trends Current year‐to‐date growth in sales is slightly above 2%, and we anticipate closing 2014  at a 2% growth; therefore our future predicted growth is estimated at 2% annually.    Assuming a maximum hydro generation of 135,000 megawatt‐hours, and maximum  wind generation of 26,000 megawatt‐hours, KEA’s renewable energy portfolio totals  161,000 megawatt‐hours.  KEA’s load forecast indicates we will no longer be able to  meet the communities’ electric needs without reliance on diesel generation starting in  2017.  In 2017, KEA’s annual generation needs are predicted at 163,493,000 kilowatt‐ hours, a shortfall of approximately 2,493,000 kilowatt‐hours that will have to be  generated with diesel.  The generation needs of the community continue to increase to  187,802 megawatt‐hours by the year 2024.  d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] N/A  ii. Electricity [kWh] N/A  iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] N/A  iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] N/A  v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] N/A  vi. Other N/A  110,000 120,000 130,000 140,000 150,000 160,000 170,000 180,000 190,000 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023MWH Year ANNUAL SYSTEM MWH ACTUAL PREDICTION KEA's ExistingRenewable Energy Supply is 161, 000 MWh Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 25 of 36 7/2/14 Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage (Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels) a) Proposed renewable capacity (Wind, Hydro, Biomass, other) [kW or MMBtu/hr] N/A – diversion is water conveyance system that  provides available energy resource to Terror Lake, no  new generators are involved  b) Proposed annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable) i. Electricity [kWh] 30,000,000 kWh annually  ii. Heat [MMBtu] N/A  c) Proposed annual fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] N/A  ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu] N/A  iii. Wood or pellets [cords, green tons, dry tons] N/A  iv. Other N/A  Project Cost a) Total capital cost of new system $50,000,000  b) Development cost $550,000  c) Annual O&M cost of new system $150,000   The AEA model indicates O&M costs for  hydro generation at 2 cents per kilowatt‐hour, so this  project would be estimated at $600,000 O&M utilizing  that model. KEA’s historical O&M cost for the Terror  Lake facility has been just slightly under 2 cents per  kilowatt‐hour. This project is to provide an additional  diversion to the current Terror Lake Hydro facility and  therefore KEA anticipates minimal O&M increases.  d) Annual fuel cost N/A  Project Benefits a) Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity 30,000,000 kWh  ii. Heat N/A – KEA supplies electricity, but electric usage is expected to increase as  the community transitions from oil to electricity to power its heating and  potentially transportation needs.      iii. Transportation b) Current price of displaced fuel KEA’s current fuel cost is $3.49 per gallon  Residential heating fuel cost is $4.0729 per gallon      Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 26 of 36 7/2/14 c) Other economic benefits $1,267,419 additional revenue from estimated annual  increase in electric energy sales from seafood processing  facilities of 8,011,500 kilowatt‐hours. (Section 5.1)  Without the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion we would  have the additional cost of 564,189 gallons of diesel fuel  annually needed to power new seafood processor loads.  d) Alaska public benefits Providing locally‐generated, fuel‐free, emission‐free,  renewable power at a predictable cost is the foundation  for a self‐reliant, stable economy for benefit of Kodiak  and the State of Alaska.   Power Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for power purchase/sale N/A  Project Analysis a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio Payback (years) Simple payback on this project is 12 years.  4.4.5 Impact on Rates Briefly explain what if any effect your project will have on electrical rates in the proposed benefit area. If the is for a PCE eligible utility please discuss what the expected impact would be for both pre and post PCE. This project enables KEA to continue being the energy solution for the Kodiak community by  maintaining stable electric rates.  For 2014 year‐to‐date, KEA’s members are paying an average  of 15.82 cents per kilowatt‐hour, which is a reduction of 1.7% from their 2013 average cost per  kilowatt‐hour.  While other utilities around the nation are struggling with rate increases, KEA is  proud to continue providing stable, or slightly lower, electric rates.  Thanks to the assistance of  AEA through previous Renewable Energy Fund grants, KEA provides power to its members with  a renewable energy portfolio and does not foresee any rate increases in the future.    Capital Costs ‐ Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 50,000,000$                 Life  of Plant ‐ Years 50.00                              FFB Interest Rate  (estimate)3.02% FFB Loan ‐ Years 30                                    Cost of Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 50,000,000$                 Inflation Rate 1.03                                Cost of Fuel (August 2014)3.49$                              KWH per gallon of diesel 14.20                              Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Annual KWh 30,000,000                   Total  Cost Savings 1,049,572,336$           Simple Payback (Years)12                                    Net Present Value 242,911,636$              Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 27 of 36 7/2/14 Acting now with the final design and permitting of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion project is  what will allow KEA to continuously meet its growing load demand with renewable energy  priced at these stable rates.  The alternative of reverting back to diesel‐powered generation  when load demand surpasses KEA’s available hydro‐wind energy supply would have a more  devastating effect on electrical rates; that is exactly the situation that KEA strives to avoid with  its renewable energy vision for 2020 and the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion.        KEA does not participate in the PCE program.        SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following:  Potential annual fuel displacement (gallons and dollars) over the lifetime of the evaluated renewable energy project  Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price, RCA tariff, or cost based rate)  Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits)  Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or programs that might be available)  Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project 5.1 Public Benefit for Projects with Private Sector Sales Projects that include sales of power to private sector businesses (sawmills, cruise ships, mines, etc.), please provide a brief description of the direct and indirect public benefits derived from the project as well as the private sector benefits and complete the table below. See section 1.6 in the Request for Applications for more information. The economic benefits of the project are itemized in the following table.  The project is  estimated to be on‐line in the year 2020.  Current fuel costs of $3.49 have been escalated at a  3% inflation rate.  The direct cost savings in the elimination of diesel fuel for generation of  electric energy  for the life of the project is calculated at $984,347,095.53, and the total gallons  of diesels saved is 97,536,482.  Further, the AEA Economic Model calculates avoided CO2  emissions at 21,444 tonnes per year, with a lifetime avoided CO2 emissions of 1,072,183 tonnes.  There is no doubt of the significant economic benefit the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion project  provides to the community of Kodiak and the State of Alaska.    Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 28 of 36 7/2/14 The Upper Hidden Basin Diversion project is assumed to be a 50 year project with a Net Present  Value (NPV) of $242,911,636 as calculated using the NPV table below.  The depreciation is  calculated by using the $50 million estimated project cost over a 50 year useful life.  Interest rate  of 3.015% is the current RUS rate for a 30 year FFB loan.  Annual O&M costs are estimated at  $150,000 (See section 4.4.4 Project Cost for further explanation)   Fuel savings and Diesel  Maintenance savings are calculated in the table above.  Adding these elements together  calculates the Total yearly savings.  Over the 50 year project life total savings equals  $1,049,572,336 with a NPV of $242,911,636.  Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Hidden Fuel Price Diesel Diesel Maintenance  Predicted Current Pillar Mountain Basin Galllon of 3.49$            Operation With Annual Terror Lake Wind Diversion kWh per Diesel Inflation Cost per kWh 3.0% Year Generation Generation Generation Annual kWh gallon Diesel Saved 3.0% Fuel  Savings 0.0425 Inflation 2020 167,635,030        135,000,000        26,000,000        6,635,030      14.2               467,256       4.17$            1,947,167.54$      0.050747223 336,709.34$                  2021 169,686,510        135,000,000        26,000,000        8,686,510      14.2               611,726       4.29$            2,625,687.15$      0.052269639 454,040.74$                  2022 171,737,990        135,000,000        26,000,000        10,737,990    14.2               756,196       4.42$            3,343,165.49$      0.053837728 578,108.99$                  2023 173,789,470        135,000,000        26,000,000        12,789,470    14.2               900,667       4.55$            4,101,329.41$      0.05545286 709,212.69$                  2024 175,840,950        135,000,000        26,000,000        14,840,950    14.2               1,045,137    4.69$            4,901,974.32$      0.057116446 847,662.32$                  2025 177,892,430        135,000,000        26,000,000        16,892,430    14.2               1,189,608    4.83$            5,746,966.72$      0.05882994 993,780.64$                  2026 179,943,910        135,000,000        26,000,000        18,943,910    14.2               1,334,078    4.98$            6,638,246.89$      0.060594838 1,147,903.15$              2027 181,995,390        135,000,000        26,000,000        20,995,390    14.2               1,478,549    5.13$            7,577,831.60$      0.062412683 1,310,378.62$              2028 184,046,870        135,000,000        26,000,000        23,046,870    14.2               1,623,019    5.28$            8,567,816.97$      0.064285063 1,481,569.50$              2029 186,098,350        135,000,000        26,000,000        25,098,350    14.2               1,767,489    5.44$            9,610,381.42$      0.066213615 1,661,852.49$              2030 188,149,830        135,000,000        26,000,000        27,149,830    14.2               1,911,960    5.60$            10,707,788.70$    0.068200024 1,851,619.05$              2031 190,201,310        135,000,000        26,000,000        29,201,310    14.2               2,056,430    5.77$            11,862,391.07$    0.070246024 2,051,275.93$              2032 192,252,790        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    5.94$            12,552,446.59$    0.072353405 2,170,602.15$              2033 194,304,270        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    6.12$            12,929,019.98$    0.074524007 2,235,720.22$              2034 196,355,750        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    6.30$            13,316,890.58$    0.076759727 2,302,791.82$              2035 198,407,230        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    6.49$            13,716,397.30$    0.079062519 2,371,875.58$              2036 200,458,710        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    6.69$            14,127,889.22$    0.081434395 2,443,031.85$              2037 202,510,190        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    6.89$            14,551,725.90$    0.083877427 2,516,322.80$              2038 204,561,670        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    7.09$            14,988,277.67$    0.08639375 2,591,812.49$              2039 206,613,150        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    7.31$            15,437,926.00$    0.088985562 2,669,566.86$              2040 208,664,630        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    7.53$            15,901,063.78$    0.091655129 2,749,653.87$              2041 210,716,110        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    7.75$            16,378,095.70$    0.094404783 2,832,143.48$              2042 212,767,590        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    7.98$            16,869,438.57$    0.097236926 2,917,107.79$              2043 214,819,070        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    8.22$            17,375,521.72$    0.100154034 3,004,621.02$              2044 216,870,550        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    8.47$            17,896,787.38$    0.103158655 3,094,759.65$              2045 218,922,030        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    8.73$            18,433,691.00$    0.106253415 3,187,602.44$              2046 220,973,510        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    8.99$            18,986,701.73$    0.109441017 3,283,230.51$              2047 223,024,990        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    9.26$            19,556,302.78$    0.112724248 3,381,727.43$              2048 225,076,470        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    9.53$            20,142,991.86$    0.116105975 3,483,179.25$              2049 227,127,950        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    9.82$            20,747,281.62$    0.119589154 3,587,674.63$              2050 229,179,430        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    10.11$          21,369,700.07$    0.123176829 3,695,304.87$              2051 231,230,910        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    10.42$          22,010,791.07$    0.126872134 3,806,164.01$              2052 233,282,390        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    10.73$          22,671,114.80$    0.130678298 3,920,348.93$              2053 235,333,870        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    11.05$          23,351,248.24$    0.134598647 4,037,959.40$              2054 237,385,350        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    11.38$          24,051,785.69$    0.138636606 4,159,098.18$              2055 239,436,830        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    11.73$          24,773,339.26$    0.142795704 4,283,871.13$              2056 241,488,310        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    12.08$          25,516,539.44$    0.147079575 4,412,387.26$              2057 243,539,790        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    12.44$          26,282,035.62$    0.151491963 4,544,758.88$              2058 245,591,270        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    12.81$          27,070,496.69$    0.156036722 4,681,101.65$              2059 247,642,750        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    13.20$          27,882,611.59$    0.160717823 4,821,534.70$              2060 249,694,230        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    13.59$          28,719,089.94$    0.165539358 4,966,180.74$              2061 251,745,710        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    14.00$          29,580,662.64$    0.170505539 5,115,166.16$              2062 253,797,190        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    14.42$          30,468,082.52$    0.175620705 5,268,621.15$              2063 255,848,670        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    14.85$          31,382,124.99$    0.180889326 5,426,679.78$              2064 257,900,150        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    15.30$          32,323,588.74$    0.186316006 5,589,480.17$              2065 259,951,630        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    15.76$          33,293,296.41$    0.191905486 5,757,164.58$              2066 262,003,110        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    16.23$          34,292,095.30$    0.197662651 5,929,879.52$              2067 264,054,590        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    16.72$          35,320,858.16$    0.20359253 6,107,775.90$              2068 266,106,070        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    17.22$          36,380,483.90$    0.209700306 6,291,009.18$              2069 268,157,550        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    17.74$          37,471,898.42$    0.215991315 6,479,739.45$              2070 270,209,030        135,000,000        26,000,000        30,000,000    14.2               2,112,676    18.27$          38,596,055.37$    0.222471055 6,674,131.64$              Totals 97,536,482 984,347,095.53$   Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 29 of 36 7/2/14    Hidden Basin Diversion Project ‐ Net Present Value Table Year Interest Cost at  3.015% Annual Depreciation Hidden Basin O& M  Costs with 3% Inflation Fuel Savings with 3%  Inflation Diesel Maintenance   with 3% Inflation Total  Savings 1 ‐$1,488,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$150,000 $1,947,168 $336,709 ‐$354,779 2 ‐$1,438,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$154,500 $2,625,687 $454,041 $486,822 3 ‐$1,388,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$159,135 $3,343,165 $578,109 $1,373,983 4 ‐$1,337,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$163,909 $4,101,329 $709,213 $2,308,727 5 ‐$1,287,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$168,826 $4,901,974 $847,662 $3,293,154 6 ‐$1,237,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$173,891 $5,746,967 $993,781 $4,329,450 7 ‐$1,187,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$179,108 $6,638,247 $1,147,903 $5,419,886 8 ‐$1,136,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$184,481 $7,577,832 $1,310,379 $6,566,823 9 ‐$1,086,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$190,016 $8,567,817 $1,481,569 $7,772,715 10 ‐$1,036,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$195,716 $9,610,381 $1,661,852 $9,040,112 11 ‐$986,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$201,587 $10,707,789 $1,851,619 $10,371,664 12 ‐$935,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$207,635 $11,862,391 $2,051,276 $11,770,126 13 ‐$885,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$213,864 $12,552,447 $2,170,602 $12,623,528 14 ‐$835,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$220,280 $12,929,020 $2,235,720 $13,109,054 15 ‐$785,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$226,888 $13,316,891 $2,302,792 $13,607,638 16 ‐$734,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$233,695 $13,716,397 $2,371,876 $14,119,672 17 ‐$684,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$240,706 $14,127,889 $2,443,032 $14,645,559 18 ‐$634,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$247,927 $14,551,726 $2,516,323 $15,185,715 19 ‐$584,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$255,365 $14,988,278 $2,591,812 $15,740,569 20 ‐$533,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$263,026 $15,437,926 $2,669,567 $16,310,561 21 ‐$483,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$270,917 $15,901,064 $2,749,654 $17,896,145 22 ‐$433,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$279,044 $16,378,096 $2,832,143 $18,497,789 23 ‐$383,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$287,416 $16,869,439 $2,917,108 $19,115,975 24 ‐$332,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$296,038 $17,375,522 $3,004,621 $19,751,199 25 ‐$282,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$304,919 $17,896,787 $3,094,760 $20,403,972 26 ‐$232,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$314,067 $18,433,691 $3,187,602 $21,074,820 27 ‐$182,156 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$323,489 $18,986,702 $3,283,231 $21,764,287 28 ‐$131,906 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$333,193 $19,556,303 $3,381,727 $22,472,931 29 ‐$81,656 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$343,189 $20,142,992 $3,483,179 $23,201,326 30 ‐$31,406 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$353,485 $20,747,282 $3,587,675 $23,950,065 31 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$364,089 $21,369,700 $3,695,305 $24,700,916 32 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$375,012 $22,010,791 $3,806,164 $25,441,943 33 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$386,262 $22,671,115 $3,920,349 $26,205,201 34 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$397,850 $23,351,248 $4,037,959 $26,991,357 35 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$409,786 $24,051,786 $4,159,098 $27,801,098 36 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$422,079 $24,773,339 $4,283,871 $28,635,131 37 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$434,742 $25,516,539 $4,412,387 $29,494,185 38 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$447,784 $26,282,036 $4,544,759 $30,379,011 39 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$461,218 $27,070,497 $4,681,102 $31,290,381 40 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$475,054 $27,882,612 $4,821,535 $32,229,092 41 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$489,306 $28,719,090 $4,966,181 $33,195,965 42 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$503,985 $29,580,663 $5,115,166 $34,191,844 43 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$519,104 $30,468,083 $5,268,621 $35,217,599 44 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$534,678 $31,382,125 $5,426,680 $36,274,127 45 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$550,718 $32,323,589 $5,589,480 $37,362,351 46 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$567,239 $33,293,296 $5,757,165 $38,483,222 47 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$584,257 $34,292,095 $5,929,880 $39,637,718 48 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$601,784 $35,320,858 $6,107,776 $40,826,850 49 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$619,838 $36,380,484 $6,291,009 $42,051,655 50 ‐$1,000,000 ‐$638,433 $37,471,898 $6,479,739 $43,313,205 Cost Savings $1,049,572,336 NPV $242,911,636 Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 30 of 36 7/2/14 Other public benefits not utilized in the direct cost savings of the project include a potential  increase in electric energy sales. Communication with local seafood processing plants indicates  their intention to make Kodiak the regional seafood processing hub for the Gulf of Alaska  fisheries.  One of Kodiak’s seafood processors has informed KEA that they expect their yearly  processing capacity to double, and that seafood processing plant alone accounted 8,011,504  kilowatt‐hours of KEA’s sales in 2013.  The additional 30,000,000 kilowatt‐hours provided by the  Upper Hidden Basin project would allow this industrial user to double its capacity without the  need for diesel generation until the year 2034.      KEA’s stable and affordable price per kilowatt‐hour will benefit Kodiak’s seafood industry’s  operations, and this benefit will spill over to the community of Kodiak with economic benefits  and increased employment opportunities.   The table below is taking the estimated increase in  fish processing monthly amount of 667,625 kWh at KEA‘s current average kWh cost of 15.82  cents and provides increased monthly revenues of $105,618.  That provides an additional annual  benefit of $1,267,419 provided by this project. Renewable energy resource availability (kWh per month) 2,500,000  Estimated sales (kWh) 667,625/month  Revenue for displacing diesel generation for use at private sector businesses ($) $105,618/month Estimated sales (kWh) N/A  Revenue for displacing diesel generation for use by the Alaskan public ($) N/A  There is no private power purchase agreement associated with this project.  Hydropower  generated from the additional water resource of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project  would go straight into the KEA grid for the direct benefit of our Cooperative Member‐Owners.   The Kodiak community will continue to experience a stable cost of power from avoiding reliance  on diesel fuel consumption to meet growing loads.    SECTION 6– SUSTAINABILITY Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a minimum:  Proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered.  How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project  Identification of operational issues that could arise.  A description of operational costs including on-going support for any back-up or existing systems that may be require to continue operation  Commitment to reporting the savings and benefits This project will not change KEA’s current business structure.  This project is an expansion to an  already successful operating facility.  Operational and maintenance costs at the Terror Lake  Hydroelectric Project are not anticipated to substantially increase when the Upper Hidden Basin  Diversion is constructed.   No additional support is required to continue operating the Terror  Lake Hydroelectric Project.        Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 31 of 36 7/2/14 The project will be sustainable on a continual basis for the following reasons:   The Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility is the cornerstone in developing future sustainable  renewable energy for the long term benefit of the Kodiak community.      KEA has been responsible for the operations and maintenance at the Terror Lake  Hydroelectric Facility for the past 30 years.  An additional hydro diversion will not  substantially change the operations or maintenance of this facility.    The evaluation of adding the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion was initially performed in  1978 for the Alaska Power Authority (APA) now Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) and the  study indicated that the Terror Lake facility should expand with this additional diversion  when KEA’s system load warranted the installation.     The available water resource provided by the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project as  measured by the USGS is estimated to add 30,000,000 kilowatt‐hours of renewable  energy to the Terror Lake reservoir, which would cover KEA’s growing load for decades to  come.   Continual load growth expected in Kodiak justifies the expansion of KEA’s renewable  generation system with a need for more hydropower resources.          KEA will provide reports to the AEA on the savings and benefits realized from this project as  required in the grant agreement.    SECTION 7 – READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS Discuss what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed with work once your grant is approved. Tell us what you may have already accomplished on the project to date and identify other grants that may have been previously awarded for this project and the degree you have been able to meet the requirements of previous grants.   KEA is currently proceeding with the feasibility and conceptual design phase of the Upper  Hidden Basin Diversion Project without any grant funding support.  Year‐to‐date, KEA has  expended over $80,000 to collect stream flow data in the Upper Hidden Basin watershed to  confirm the available hydrologic resource for the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility.  Stream flow  data is also being collected in the lower reaches of the watershed to assess the potential impact  of diverting flow from the upper watershed on the downstream habitat.  Fish presence/absence  studies and initial wetland mapping is currently underway in preparation of resource agency  consultation.  An engineering team is currently developing a conceptual design and preliminary  construction cost estimate for the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion, and the final report is  expected to be completed by December 2014.  KEA is conducting these preliminary studies and  conceptual design work now so that the Phase III permitting process may proceed once this  grant request is approved.  KEA has no other grant funds for this project.      Considering KEA’s readiness with proceeding into the Phase III permitting process in 2015, it  would be beneficial if AEA would consider providing KEA an opportunity to allow our grant  match to occur prior to July 1, 2015 as project expenses accrue in preparation of the FERC  licensing and NEPA scoping documents for First Stage Consultation (Milestone 1).    Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 32 of 36 7/2/14 KEA is very appreciative of support received from AEA for other renewable energy  developments, including the wind turbine installations on Pillar Mountain, the third turbine‐ generator installation at the Terror Lake Hydroelectric Facility, and the BESS installation.  KEA  has been in full compliance with these previous grant agreements, and will continue to be in full  compliance with this proposed grant.    SECTION 8 – LOCAL SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION Discuss local support and opposition, known or anticipated, for the project. Include letters of support or other documentation of local support from the community that would benefit from this project. The Documentation of support must be dated within one year of the RFA date of July 2, 2014 Exhibit B includes letters and resolutions of support from the City of Kodiak, Kodiak Island  Borough and the Kodiak Chamber of Commerce in support of KEA’s Upper Hidden Basin  Diversion project.      The Kodiak community is extremely supportive of KEA’s efforts in developing renewable energy  solutions.  The continued support provided by the local community of Kodiak and the statewide  community of Alaska has been a major component to KEA’s success.  KEA has received the  following comments of support from our members:    I’m very impressed with the commitment everyone in Kodiak has for renewable energy in  protecting our island.  Larry Van Daele   I’m encouraged we are making every effort we can to be free of diesel – for financial and  environmental reasons.  Craig Baker   Keep up the good work on making Kodiak a better place to live.  It would be good if other  people on the island would do the same thing.  Thank you. Patsy Maher   I am proud Kodiak is so forward thinking in terms of energy!  I love it!  Fran March   Thank you for taking care of us and Kodiak residents!  Good job!  James Harrod   Sustainable energy in Kodiak is money in the bank.  Jane Eiseman   AWESOME!! COPA appears to be going down!!  Richard Pestrikoff   Hurray!  This is the first time my bill has been under $100 since I can’t remember!  Leslie  G. Seaton    With AEA’s assistance, KEA is viewed as a shining star in implementing sustainable, renewable  energy solutions and has been recognized for its performance by the US Department of Energy  and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association as the 2009 Wind Cooperative of the Year  for leadership, innovation, commitment, project creativity and benefits resulting from Alaska’s  first utility‐scale wind project.  KEA was also awarded with the 2009 Kodiak Chamber of  Commerce Cornerstone Award for developing Kodiak’s renewable energy resources for the  betterment of all Kodiak residents, and KEA’s Kodiak High Penetration Wind Project was  selected as a finalist for the 2013 Energy Storage North America Award by the California Energy  Storage Alliance.  KEA’s efforts with expanding its renewable energy generation system continue  to draw the attention of media outlets that travel to Kodiak to learn how even a small rural  Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 33 of 36 7/2/14 electric cooperative like KEA could make a huge difference in our nation’s efforts to develop its  renewable energy resources and achieve energy independence.      Developing a new hydropower diversion near the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge is expected to  generate interest from regulatory agencies regarding the project’s impact on wildlife and  downstream habitat.  KEA will work diligently with all interested parties to ensure that the  public’s interest in this unique environment is protected.  In accordance with the FERC License  Amendment process, KEA will consult with the appropriate resource agencies, native tribes, and  members of the public throughout the 3‐stage consultation and NEPA scoping process.  KEA has  a positive working relationship with the regulatory agencies, native tribes, and the public and  has the ability to resolve potential opposition through the project’s permitting process.        SECTION 9 – GRANT BUDGET Tell us how much you are seeking in grant funds. Include any investments to date and funding sources, how much is being requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an applicant. 9.1 Funding sources and Financial Commitment Provide a narrative summary regarding funding source and your financial commitment to the project KEA is committed to proceeding with the final design and permitting of the Upper Hidden Basin  Diversion project because this project is the next best step for achieving KEA’s renewable energy  vision for 2020.  As loads grow, KEA must have a plan for meeting its members’ electrical  demand without reverting back to costly diesel fuel.  KEA has not secured any other grant funds  for this project, and is currently funding the initial stages of this project development through  KEA’s cash reserve.  Any grant support for this project will help offset the cost borne by the KEA  membership.      The total cost of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion is estimated at $50,000,000.  The cost for this  phase of the project is estimated at $2,500,000.  This grant application is requesting 50%  matching funds for the Phase III Final Design and Permitting phase of the Hidden Basin Diversion  project.  KEA is committed to providing the $1,250,000 in matching funds for this phase of the  project.  The KEA Board of Directors is aware of the total project cost as well as the portion of  that total cost to finalize the design and secure the permits in order to build the Upper Hidden  Basin Diversion Project.  The KEA Board of Directors has expressed their formal endorsement of  the project through Resolution 694‐14 Authorization for President/CEO to Represent KEA and  Apply for a Renewable Energy Fund Grant though the Alaska Energy Authority, dated August 28,  2014, attached as Exhibit C.  9.2 Cost Estimate for Metering Equipment Please provide a short narrative, and cost estimate, identifying the metering equipment, and its related use to comply with the operations reporting requirement identified in Section 3.15 of the Request for Applications.   Section 3.15 of the Request for Applications refers to reporting requirements for Phase IV  Construction projects.  This grant application is requesting funds for Phase III. Final Design and  Permitting, not construction.    Renewable Energy Fund Round VIII Grant Application - Standard Form AEA 15003 Page 34 of 36 7/2/14 Applications MUST include a separate worksheet for each project phase that was identified in section 2.3.2 of this application, (I. Reconnaissance, II. Feasibility and Conceptual Design, III. Final Design and Permitting, and IV. Construction and Commissioning). Please use the tables provided below to detail your proposed project’s budget. Be sure to use one table for each phase of your project. If you have any question regarding how to prepare these tables or if you need assistance preparing the application please feel free to contact AEA at 907-771-3031 or by emailing the Grants Administrator, Shawn Calfa, at scalfa@aidea.org.   Upper Hidden Basin Diversion  Project Phase III.  Final Design and Permitting   Milestone or Task Anticipated Completion Date RE- Fund Grant Funds Grantee Matching Funds Source of Matching Funds TOTALS First Stage Consultation December 2015 $     50,000 $     50,000 KEA Cash $    100,000  Geotechnical Site Survey December 2015 $   350,000 $   350,000 KEA Cash $    700,000  Environmental Assessment  Field Studies October 2016 $   500,000 $   500,000 KEA Cash $ 1,000,000  Final Engineering Design December 2016 $   250,000 $   250,000 KEA Cash $    500,000  Second Stage Consultation June 2017 $     75,000 $     75,000 KEA Cash $    150,000  Final FERC Application Filing December 2017 $     25,000 $     25,000 KEA Cash $      50,000  TOTALS $1,250,000 $1,250,000  $ 2,500,000  Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $   150,000 $   150,000  $    300,000  Travel & Per Diem $               0 $               0  $                0  Equipment $               0 $               0  $                0  Materials & Supplies $               0 $               0  $                0  Contractual Services $1,100,000 $1,100,000  $ 2,200,000  Construction Services $               0 $               0  $                0  Other $               0 $               0  $                0  TOTALS $1,250,000 $1,250,000  $ 2,500,000  Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. Renewable Energy Fund Grant – Round VIII List of Exhibits     Exhibit Document Title              A  Consultant Resumes   John Gangemi, ERM   Steven Brandon, Lachel & Associates, Inc.                B  Letters and Resolutions Demonstrating Local Support   City of Kodiak   Kodiak Island Borough   Kodiak Chamber of Commerce           C  KEA Resolution 694‐14 Authorization for President/CEO to      Represent KEA and Apply for a Renewable Energy Fund Grant      through the Alaska Energy Authority       D Maps   Project Location in Alaska   Project Location on Kodiak Island   Project Preliminary Layout   KEA Service Area          E Hidden Basin Creek Diversion Pre‐Feasibility Analysis   Excerpt of Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project’s Definite  Project Report, dated December 1978   US Geologic Survey Stream Gauge Records   EBASCO Construction Cost Letter, dated February 27, 1983                        Exhibit B   Letters Demonstrating Local Support      City of Kodiak   Kodiak Island Borough   Kodiak Chamber of Commerce                                  1 2 3 4 5 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 6 RESOLUTION NO. FY2015-06 7 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY 9 URGING THE ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY AND ALASKA STATE 10 LEGISLATURE TO AWARD GRANT FUNDING FOR KODIAK 11 ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION’S UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION 12 PROJECT 13 14 WHEREAS, safe and reliable electric energy is an essential service for residents of the 15 Kodiak Island Borough; and 16 17 WHEREAS, unstable diesel fuel prices create volatile electric rates that hinder economic 18 development in the Kodiak region; and 19 20 WHEREAS, renewable energy provides a sustainable power supply and power cost 21 stability; and 22 23 WHEREAS, renewable power is crucial for the environmental health of Kodiak Island, 24 the state, and the nation; and 25 26 WHEREAS, adding hydropower resources to Terror Lake through the development of a 27 new hydropower diversion in the Upper Hidden Basin watershed will enhance the Terror 28 Lake Hydroelectric Facility’s ability to meet future electrical load in Kodiak with renewable 29 power; and 30 31 WHEREAS, the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project is a technically and economically 32 feasible project that Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. is able to complete and operate for 33 the long-term benefit of the Kodiak community; and 34 35 WHEREAS, the final design and permitting of Kodiak Electric Association, Inc.’s Upper 36 Hidden Basin Diversion Project is in need of capital project funding; and 37 38 WHEREAS, the State of Alaska is committed to supporting the development and 39 enhancement of its renewable power through the establishment of the Renewable Energy 40 Grant Fund for the benefit of all Alaskans. 41 42 43 44 45 Introduced by: Borough Manager Requested by: Darron Scott, KEA Drafted by: Darron Scott, KEA Introduced on: 09/04/2014 Adopted on: 09/04/2014 Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2015-06 Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND 46 BOROUGH THAT the Alaska Energy Authority and the Alaska State Legislature are urged 47 to award a grant from the Renewable Energy Fund to Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. for 48 the final design and permitting of the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project. 49 50 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 51 THIS FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 52 53 54 Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2015-06 Page 2 of 2       Exhibit C   KEA Board Resolution No. 694‐14  Authorization for President/CEO to Represent KEA   and Apply for a Renewable Energy Fund Grant   through the Alaska Energy Authority                                        Exhibit D   Maps     Project Location in Alaska   Project Location on Kodiak Island   Project Preliminary Layout   KEA Service Area                               mileskm10002000 mileskm100200 D-West 153°0'59.068"W 57°35'37.413"N D-East 153°0'22.716"W 57°35'29.189"N Approximate West Tunnel Portal Te r ro r La ke Road Te r ro r La ke Access Road Proposed Tunnel Diversion Dams Terror Lake Proposed Access Road 35003000250020003 5 0 0 300 0 400030002500300035003000250035 0 0 15003 5 0 0 500 1000 15003500 1500 2 0 0 0 2000 2500500 10 0 02000 200030001 5 0 0 200025000 4,000 8,0002,000 Feet Contours derived from ASTER DEM Terrain Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Alaska 5 FIPS 5005 Feet Figure 1 Location Plan Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Project       Exhibit E   Hidden Basin Creek Diversion  Pre‐Feasibility Analysis     Excerpt of Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project’s Definite  Project Report, dated December 1978   US Geologic Survey Stream Gauge Records   EBASCO Construction Cost Letter, dated   February 27, 1983      USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGSUSGS Water ResourcesData Category:Surface WaterGeographic Area:United StatesGONational Water Information System: Web InterfaceClick forNews Bulletins USGS Surface-Water Daily Statistics for the NationThe statistics generated from this site are based on approved daily-mean data and may not match those published by the USGS in official publications. The user is responsible for assessment and use of statistics from this site. For more details on why the statistics may not match, click here.USGS 15297100 HIDDEN BASIN C NR PORT LIONS AK Available data for this site Time-series: Daily statisticsGOKodiak Island Borough, AlaskaHydrologic Unit Code 19020701Latitude 57°35'42", Longitude 153°00'45" NAD27Drainage area 3.01 square milesGage datum 1,500 feet above NGVD29Output formatsHTML table of all data Tab-separated data Reselect output format 00060, Discharge, cubic feet per second,Day ofmonthMean of daily mean values for each day for 1 - 2 years of record in, ft3/s (Calculation Period 1981-10-01 -> 1984-09-30) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec15.1 3.1 1.5 1.4 10 82 117 76 20 23 4.4 2425.3 2.9 1.5 1.4 11 71 100 73 21 25 4.6 1634.5 2.7 1.5 1.5 10 65 88 66 24 17 5.1 1446.4 2.6 1.4 1.5 9.0 61 84 64 19 12 6.6 1154.0 2.5 1.4 1.5 7.0 59 94 89 38 10 17 1163.5 2.4 1.4 1.5 6.0 65 100 67 23 9.6 52 1273.3 2.3 1.4 1.5 6.0 78 151 107 23 8.8 41 1283.1 2.2 1.4 1.5 9.0 79 178 102 23 7.9 36 8.793.0 2.1 1.4 1.6 12 76 129 81 20 9.2 51 7.8102.9 2.1 1.4 1.6 56 74 108 69 25 25 31 8.2Page 1 of 2USGS Surface Water data for USA: USGS Surface-Water Daily Statistics8/14/2014http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dvstat?referred_module=sw&site_no=15297100&por_15297100_1=623726,00060,1,1982-08-01,1984-0... 112.8 2.0 1.4 1.6 80 64 106 59 14 24 16 131220 1.9 1.4 1.7 60 68 114 47 23 13 12 9.21314 1.9 1.4 1.7 53 82 124 42 41 11 10 7.4145.6 1.8 1.4 1.7 52 94 130 41 29 12 10 6.8154.2 1.8 1.4 1.8 44 87 120 30 142 55 12 7.0163.7 1.7 1.4 1.8 72 82 178 26 36 52 10 6.1173.4 1.7 1.4 1.8 58 83 162 28 82 40 8.5 5.7183.2 1.7 1.4 1.9 45 81 145 29 84 26 7.0 5.3196.2 1.7 1.4 1.9 45 82 130 27 44 21 6.0 5.1203.0 1.6 1.4 1.9 41 121 114 22 55 15 6.8 7.4212.9 1.6 1.4 2.0 45 245 98 20 55 15 8.0 6.8224.6 1.6 1.4 2.2 43 215 122 27 29 10 7.8 5.1235.6 1.6 1.4 2.4 41 187 122 28 20 10 8.5 4.9245.9 1.6 1.4 2.7 42 178 180 27 14 8.4 10 4.8256.8 1.5 1.4 3.4 38 170 129 24 17 7.1 12 4.52615 1.5 1.4 4.0 45 172 104 20 15 6.6 14 8.0273.5 1.5 1.4 4.7 68 225 90 18 13 6.0 17 8.5282.8 1.5 1.4 5.8 60 198 81 19 25 5.6 33 18292.5 1.4 6.8 66 168 125 23 40 5.2 80 18302.3 1.4 8.0 73 156 228 20 27 4.7 40 9.2312.1 1.4 84 134 20 4.4 5.7Questions about sites/data?Feedback on this web siteAutomated retrievalsHelpData TipsExplanation of termsSubscribe for system changesNewsAccessibility Plug-Ins FOIA Privacy Policies and NoticesU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyTitle: Surface Water data for USA: USGS Surface-Water Daily Statistics URL: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dvstat?Page Contact Information: Alaska Water Data Support TeamPage Last Modified: 2014-08-14 15:55:23 EDT0.39 0.37 caww01Page 2 of 2USGS Surface Water data for USA: USGS Surface-Water Daily Statistics8/14/2014http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dvstat?referred_module=sw&site_no=15297100&por_15297100_1=623726,00060,1,1982-08-01,1984-0...