Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDR Report on Anchorage Area MSW 2013itnt� ONECOMPANY Memo To: Aaron Love, Chugach Electric Association, Inc. Prepared Karl Fryklind, P.E. by. Wade Ellis, P.E. Teresa Peterson, EIT Reviewed William (Ted) Hawley, PE by: Date: September 18, 2013 Subject: Technical Memorandum - Anchorage Area Municipal Solid Waste Summary Introduction Project: Waste Characterization Summary Contract 51862, Task Order 72 HDR 0249-217255 Job No: This memorandum provides a summary of the Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW) produced within the Anchorage Bowl area. Anchorage Bowl Municipal Solid Waste Summary I4DR contacted the Engineering Manager, Mark Madden, with the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) - Solid Waste Services Division, and he provided data for every class of hauler that delivers waste to the tipping locations at the Central Transfer Station (CTS) and the Anchorage Regional Landfill (ARL). This includes data ranging from individuals to commercial haulers, including a specific breakdown of the MSW that Alaska Waste delivers. The summary of monthly total tonnages is shown in Table 1 below and included waste delivered both to ARL and CTS and a further breakdown for only Alaska Waste numbers is located in Table 2. For information, A more detailed summary of the monthly tonnages received at both the ARL and CTS locations is attached as Table 6. The totals shown include all wastes such as Construction and Demolition (C&D) wastes and MSW. The Anchorage Recycle Program is limited to diverting an average of 10,600 tons a year, or 3 percent of the total waste stream consisting of paper, aluminum cans and plastic bottles. This represents a limited recycling and diversion program in Anchorage. Moving forward the MOA intends to recycle up to 20 percent of the wastes that are placed in the landfill. HDR Alaska, Inc. 1 2525 C Skeet, Suite 305 ! Phone 1907) 644.2000 1 Page 1 of 8 Anchorage, AK 99503-2632 I Fax (907) 644-2022 www.hddm.com Table 1. Anchorage Bowl Municipal Waste Total Tons per Month and Annually .` Month .2010 tons . 2011 tons ` ' 1012 tans 2013(tons).Average Total ' Month tons Total ' , :Total Total = .'.:Total " Jan. 18,890 19,298 20,006 20,581 19,694 Feb. 18,043 17,474 19,665 19,141 18,581 Mar. 21,683 21,159 21,664 19,184 20,922 Apr. 23,822 23,387 26,390 21,567 23,792 May 32,008 34,366 35,202 30,035 32,903 June 35,144 31,345 31,822 28,367 31,669 July 31,849 29,830 32,671 27,437 30,446 Aug. 31,500 31,807 33,543 - 32,284 Sept. 29,380 29,410 30,542 - 29,777 Oct. 27,618 29,145 35,170 - 30,645 Nov. 23,494 20,400 25,389 - 23,095 Dec. 24,459 21,025 19,348 - 21,611 Total Year 317,891 308,646 331,413 183,953 Included in Table 2 below is the total MSW that is transported to both the ARL and the CTS by Alaska Waste. Alaska Waste delivers an average of about 53% of the total annual volumes received at both the CTS and ARL combined. Table 2. Alaska Waste Total Tons per Month and Annually Month 2010 tons 2011 tons 2012 tans 2013: tons Average Total Month tons�: Total -Total Total Total Jan. 11,304 12,359 12,222 12,087 11,993 Feb. 10,768 11,240 11,532 10,726 11,067 Mar. 12,514 12,920 11,883 11,403 12,180 Apr. 13,161 13,672 13,324 12,604 13,190 May 15,225 16,118 16,231 15,686 15,815 June 16,103 16,405 15,778 14,830 15,779 July 15,694 15,637 15,992 16,026 15,837 Aug. 16,148 17,401 16,011 16,520 Sept. 14,827 15,564 14,259 14,883 Oct. 13,677 14,824 15,421 14,641 Nov. 12,980 13,048 12,299 12,776 Dec. 12,878 13,160 11,804 12,614 Total Year 165,279 172,348 166,756 93,362 11 Note: Alaska Waste delivers approximately 90 percent to the CTS and 10 percent to the ARL HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street, Suite 305 Phone (907) 644-2000 Page 2 of 8 Anchorage, AK 99503-2632 Pac (907) 644-2022 www.hddnt.com As can be seen in Tables 1 and 2, Seasonal variations with 50 percent swings from the January — February timeframes to the summer months must also be considered when determining a WTE facility capacity. C&D waste are typically diverted from waste streams entering a WTE facility, and as there is no separate breakdown of Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste in Anchorage, we have estimated that Anchorage has a similar percentage (15 percent) of C&D waste as the Matanuska-Susitna Borough (see discussion at the end). Certain portions of C&D could be handled at a WTE facility if separated, but the system is not suitable for the many heavy and/or bulky items commonly in C&D materials. The following Table 3. indicates the amount of MSW available in Anchorage for WTE after diverting the C&D wastes. Table 3. Estimated MSW available for WTE MSW Source Average Annual Total with C&D Diverted (tons) ARL and CTS Total 271,000 Alaska Waste 143,000 Notes: 1- Numbers are rounded 2. Average of the totals in Tables 1 and 2 For Anchorage, the average percentage of growth is about 2.2 percent for the years 2010 through 2012; however, the data from 2010 to 2011 and 2011 to 2012 were significantly different at -2.9 and 7A percent, respectively. The population growth, based on the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census for the Municipality of Anchorage, had a 12.12 percent growth which equates to an average yearly population growth of 1.2 percent, and could be used as a factor in longer term MSW growth rates. Energy Content of the Waste MSW varies considerably from day-to-day, from truck -to -truck on a given day, and seasonally. By its nature, it is a nonhomogeneous mixture that defies simple definition in small quantities. However, experience has shown that the variations tend towards averages in large enough quantities and long enough periods. The US Environment Protection Agency provides data on MSW periodically. The following table is taken from their report titled "Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2011 Facts and Figures". Table 4. "Typical Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2011 Facts and Figures" and is based on National Averages after Diversion Material Type Discarded Amounts (Pi cent of Total Paper and paperboard 14.8 Glass 5.1 Steel 6.8 Aluminum 1.7 Other nonferrous metals 0.4 Plastics 17.9 Rubber and leather 3.8 Textiles 6.8 HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street Suite 305 Phone (907) 644-2000 Page 3 of 8 Anchorage, AK 99503-2632 Fax (907) 644-2022 www-hdr]nc.com Material Type - Discarded Amounts (Percent of'Total Wood 8.4 Other materials 2.0 Food, other 21.3 Yard trimmings 8.8 Miscellaneous inorganic wastes 2.4 Total MSW 100 Percentages of the types of waste streams received by the tipping locations were not available for Anchorage at this time. WTE estimates will need to assume typical percentages for waste streams. The actual WTE potential at the facility will vary depending on the "bumability" of the different waste types received. Several factors that could affect the waste stream in Anchorage are identified below. * Increased recycling will typically remove both higher and lower heating value components, as such increased recycling does not typically have much effect on energy content, but would reduce the total available feedstock. Typically, relatively heavy low higher heating value (HHV) (-0-100 Btu/lb) components such as glass, steel cans, and aluminum cans offset the lightweight HHV (-11,000 — 14,000 Btu/lb) plastics and the paper products that are slightly above the average HHV (-6,000 to 7,500 Btu/lb). 41 The Anchorage wood lot that is operated by the Anchorage Soil and Water Conservation District provides a place to dispose of trees and brush during the summer months, which subtracts some higher Btu content materials from the waste stream. This material is mulched and re -used in the landscaping market. + Yard waste is typically a lower energy content material that could have a seasonal effect of reducing the Btu content of the feedstock. Increased diversion of this material could improve the energy content of the feedstock. Generally, a WTE is sized to accommodate the wide ranges of heat content of the MSW, as is typical with seasonal and compositional changes in the waste. A heating value range in the range of 4,400 — 5,600 Btu/lb would be expected for MSW in the composition range above. Since the WTE sector began producing power, there has been an increase in the heating values of feedstock. Anecdotal evidence has pointed to increases in plastics and packaging within the waste streams. HDR was recently involved a WTE project in Honolulu, with the plant designed for 5,400 Btu/lb waste and the project achieved an acceptance test average over a seven day period of 5,487 Btu/lb of waste. This is the highest test average that HDR has witnessed in 25 years in the WTE business. Provided the waste stream composition discussion and limitations, we anticipate a higher heating value near the upper portion of the Btu/lb range noted would be a reasonable assumption. For future development, performing a waste characterization study in accordance with ASTM D 5231 - Standard Test Method for Determination of the Composition of Unprocessed Municipal Solid Waste and energy content testing could provide valuable information for any proposed WTE facility. HDR Alaska, Inc. 1 2525 C Street, Suite 305 1 Phone (907) 6"2000 1 Page 4 of 8 Anchorage, AK 99503-2632 1 Fax (907)fi44-2022 www.hddw.com Matanuska-Susitna Borough Waste Data In an attempt to quantify the total amount of MSW that is produced in close proximity to Anchorage, HDR contacted the MSB Solid Waste Division Manager, Jason Garner, and he provided four years of waste stream data shown below in Table 5. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough (MSB), tracks C&D wastes separately for the MSW and over the last four years it has averaged 15 percent of the total waste delivered to the Central Landfill. Table 5.2009-2012 Waste Data for Matanuska-Susitna Borough Year. = Description Total Tonnage Percent of Waste Stream 2009 Commercial 48,920.74 72.6% C&D 10,357.45 15.4% Residential 8,146.47 12.1 % Total 67,424.66 2010 Commercial 50,453.74 73.5% C&D 10,925.93 15.9% Residential 7,273.05 10.6% Total 68,652.72 2011 Commercial 49,129.81 71.2% C&D 11,355.73 16.5% Residential 8,472.58 12.3% Total 68,958.12 2012 Commercial 50,032.39 75.1% C&D 9,716.19 14.6% Residential 6,840.07 10.3% Total 66,588.65 Average Yearly Commercial 49,634.17 73.1% C&D 10,588.83 15.6% Residential 7,683.04 11.3 % Total 67,906.04 Summary The Municipality of Anchorage produced has been averaging nearly 320,000 tons of MSW in recent years, and production is highly variable with annual swings showing increased production during the summer months. The MSW composition is expected to be similar to that experienced by municipalities across the nation, and energy content of the wastes likely ranging within the upper end of the historical averages of 4,400 — 5,600 Btu/lb, could be expected. HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street, Suite 305 Phone (907) 644-2000 Anchorage, AK 99503.2632 Fax (907) 644-2022 www.hddnc.com Page 5 of S Sources ■ Email from Mark Madden with MOA MSW annual summaries for Anchorage. ■ Email from Jason Garner Acting MSB Solid Waste Manager with MSB Waste annual waste totals. ■ 2010 and 2012 United States of America Census data for the Municipality of Anchorage. • USEPA's "Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2011 Facts and Figures" Table. • JL Properties, Inc. "Anchorage WtE Combined Heat and Power Project" presentation. Attachment Table 6 HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street, Suite 305 Phone (907) 644-2000 Page 6 of 8 Anchorage, AK 99503.2632 Fax (907) 644-2022 www.hddnc.com Table 6. Total Tons per Municipality of Anchorage 2010 (Tons) 2011 (Tons) 2012 (Tons) 2013 (Tans) Month ARL CTS TOTAL ARL CTS TOTAL ARL CTS TOTAL ARL CTS TOTAL Average Total Month Jan. 4,093 14,797 18,890 4,159 15,139 19,298 4,636 15,369 20,006 4,819 15,762 20.591 19,694 Feb. 4,053 13,990 18.043 3,734 13,741 17,474 5,232 14,433 19665 5,021 14,120 19,141 18,581 Mar. 5,118 16.565 21683 5,165 15,994 21159 6,380 15,284 21664 4,011 15,173 19,184 20,922 Apr. 10,079 13,743 23,822 5,346 18,041 23,387 8,509 17,981 26,390 4,562 16,015 21,567 23,792 May 9,837 22,171 32,008 12,139 22,227 34,366 11,747 23,455 35.202 9,234 22,191 30,035 32,903 June 12,896 22,249 35.144 9,404 21,941 31,345 9,776 22,046 31,822 9,594 21,899 28,367 31,669 July 9,885 21,963 31,849 9,366 20.464 29,830 10,961 21,709 32.671 9,056 22,714 27,437 30,446 Aug. 8,884 22,616 31,500 9,358 22,448 31,807 11,598 21,945 33,543 32,284 Sept. 8,365 21015 29,980 9,206 20,204 29,410 10,439 20,103 30,542 29,777 Oct. 7,857 19,761 27,618 9,298 19,847 29,145 17,074 18,096 35,170 30,645 Nov. 6,548 16,947 23,494 4,403 15,997 20,400 9,101 16,288 25,389 23,095 Dec. 7,804 16,655 24,459 4,728 16,298 21,025 3,882 15,466 19,348 21,611 Total Year 95,419 222,473 317,891 86,308 222,339 308,646 1 109,335 222,077 331,413 52,431 143,504 183,953 Notes: 1. ARL: Arwhorage Regianal Landfill 2. CTS: Cemml Transfer Staliun 3. Total: Tole) Mwdcipal ofAnchomgc Landfill 4. C D Wasle is included in thew numbers, HIM Alaska, Inc, 2625 C street, Suite 306 I Phone (Ka 644-M Page 7 of 5 Mch-ge, p8 99503-2632 Fax (907) 644-2022 �.hddm- (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C S4eet, Suite 305 Phone (W) 644-200 Page 8 of Anchorega, AK 99503-2632 Fax (907) 644-2022 w .hdhnc.com