Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFUL FINAL Ketchikan Borough AEA Grant Application - reducedRenewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Application Page 1 of 26 7/2/2011 Application Forms and Instructions This instruction page and the following grant application constitutes the Grant Application Form for Round VII of the Renewable Energy Fund Heat Projects only. If your application is for energy projects that will not primarily produce heat, please use the standard application form (see RFA section 1.5). An electronic version of the Request for Applications (RFA) and both application forms is available online at: www.akenergyauthority.org/REFund7.html.  If you need technical assistance filling out this application, please contact Shawn Calfa, the Alaska Energy Authority Grant Administrator at (907) 771-3031 or at scalfa@aidea.org.  If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application forms for each project.  Multiple phases for the same project may be submitted as one application.  If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide milestones and grant budget for each phase of the project.  In order to ensure that grants provide sufficient benefit to the public, AEA may limit recommendations for grants to preliminary development phases in accordance with 3 ACC 107.605(1).  If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are completed and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.  If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed.  In the sections below, please enter responses in the spaces provided, often under the section heading. You may add additional rows or space to the form to provide sufficient space for the information, or attach additional sheets if needed. REMINDER:  Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act AS 40.25, and materials submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no statutory exemptions apply.  All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final recommendations are made to the legislature.  In accordance with 3 AAC 107.630 (b) Applicants may request trade secrets or proprietary company data be kept confidential subject to review and approval by the Authority. If you want information is to be kept confidential the applicant must: o Request the information be kept confidential. o Clearly identify the information that is the trade secret or proprietary in their application. o Receive concurrence from the Authority that the information will be kept confidential. If the Authority determines it is not confidential it will be treated as a public record in accordance with AS 40.25 or returned to the applicant upon request. Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 2 of 26 7/2/2013 SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal) Ketchikan Gateway Borough Type of Entity: Borough Fiscal Year End: June 30 Tax ID # 92-0084626 Tax Status: For-profit Non-profit x Government ( check one) Date of last financial statement audit: 6/30/2012 Mailing Address 1900 First Avenue, Ste. 210 Ketchikan, AK 99901 Physical Address 1900 First Avenue, Ste. 210 Ketchikan, AK 99901 Telephone 907-228-6625 Fax Email managersoffice@kgbak.us or mikec@kgbak.us 1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT / GRANTS MANAGER Name Dan Bockhorst Title Borough Manager Mailing Address 1900 First Avenue, Ste. 210 Ketchikan, AK 99901 Telephone 907-228-6625 Fax Email managersoffice@kgbak.us or mikec@kgbak.us 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your application will be rejected. 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or X A local government, or A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities); Yes 1.2.2 Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for the project by the applicant’s board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box ) Yes 1.2.3 As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant agreement (Section 3 of the RFA). Yes 1.2.4 If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the award as identified in the Standard Grant Agreement template at http://www.akenergyauthority.org/veep/Grant-Template.pdf. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the application.) Yes 1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant funds for the benefit of the general public. If no please describe the nature of the project and who will be the primary beneficiaries. Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 3 of 26 7/2/2013 SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY This section is intended to be no more than a 2-3 page overview of your project. 2.1 Project Title – (Provide a 4 to 7 word title for your project). Type in space below. Ketchikan Gateway Borough Biomass Heating Project 2.2 Project Location – Include the physical location of your project and name(s) of the community or communities that will benefit from your project in the subsections below. 2.2.1 Location of Project – Latitude and longitude, street address, or community name. Latitude and longitude coordinates may be obtained from Google Maps by finding you project’s location on the map and then right clicking with the mouse and selecting “What is here? The coordinates will be displayed in the Google search window above the map in a format as follows: 61.195676.-149.898663. If you would like assistance obtaining this information please contact AEA at 907-771-3031. 55.35588,-131.713607 1000 Airport Terminal Way, Ketchikan, AK 99901 and 55.352793,-131.67743 2610 4th Ave Ketchikan, AK 99901 2.2.2 Community benefiting – Name(s) of the community or communities that will be the beneficiaries of the project. Ketchikan Gateway Borough 2.3 PROJECT TYPE Put X in boxes as appropriate 2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type Wind to Heat x Biomass or Biofuels Hydro to Heat Solar Thermal Heat Recovery from Existing Sources Heat Pumps Other (Describe) 2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply) Pre-Construction Construction I. Reconnaissance III. Final Design and Permitting II. Feasibility and Conceptual Design x IV. Construction and Commissioning 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief one paragraph description of the proposed heat project. Ketchikan Gateway Borough seeks to secure its future energy independence through the construction of two biomass-fired building heating systems. The woody biomass fired boilers will replace outdated heating oil boilers, which are costly to maintain and run on heating oil number 2, which is more expensive than locally sourced woody biomass. These systems will, in turn help to stabilize and secure the forest products industry of Southeast Alaska through the sourcing of locally-produced wood pellets. Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 4 of 26 7/2/2013 2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT Briefly discuss the financial and public benefits that will result from this heat project, (such as reduced fuel costs, lower energy costs, local jobs created etc.) The economic benefit of this project will provide cost savings in terms of reduced fuel costs and lower energy costs from a modern, highly energy efficient system. It will provide economic benefits by way of short term jobs (i.e., construction) and long-term jobs (e.g., operation) and much needed economic development to the Ketchikan area by creating a biomass “micro- economy” in terms of generating and utilizing a locally available fuel source. Moreover, it will replace an existing boiler at the Airport that is at the end of it operating life and is in urgent need of replacement. As noted in Section 11, direct and indirect job creation will result from the project, benefitting the Ketchikan Gateway Borough and both subsidiary entities the Ketchikan Int’l Airport, Ketchikan Gateway Borough School District within the Borough, as well as the overall local and regional economy. In addition to the specific proposed project benefits, this will stimulate the local biomass “micro- economy”. That is the pellet production industry in and around Ketchikan will receive the greatest long-term beneficial impact from the construction of the biomass energy facilities in Ketchikan. Currently, two other local facilities utilize pellets fuels; doubling the local demand with this project will provide (1) market security for producers to respond with construction of pellet- making machinery, and (2) further stimulate the local timber industry to justify equipment to harvest young growth thinning opportunities as well as gather post-harvest forest residues commonly left in the forest. These secondary submarkets will provide value-added to the timber industry and improve ecological conditions in the forests. The stimulation of the local biomass “micro-economy” will foster others to embrace biomass boilers in the community and the region. 2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source of other contributions to the project. Ketchikan Gateway Borough is requesting $1,412,889 through this grant, matched by $353,222 provided directly by the Borough, to support its efforts to develop biomass energy projects at Ketchikan Airport and Ketchikan Gateway Borough High School. Significant funds have already been expended in evaluating the feasibility of this project, and funding for engineering design and permitting has been secured in the amount of $143,363. The requested funding is for construction of these two projects. Matching funds for construction have been secured via appropriations, and are provided in a combination of in-kind support by Borough employees, as well as cash matching contributions, totaling 20% of anticipated project cost. Project budgeting is provided in the sections below. Additional engineering and cost detail can be found in Appendix H. NOTE: Implementation of Ketchikan Airport and Ketchikan Gateway Borough High School projects at the same time is expected to yield cost and schedule efficiencies. 2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY Include a summary of grant request and your project’s total costs and benef its below. Grant Costs Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 5 of 26 7/2/2013 (Summary of funds requested) 2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application $ 1,412,889 2.7.2 Cash match to be provided $ 296,936 2.7.3 Total In-kind match to be provided (sum of lines below) $ 56,286 Biomass or Biofuel inventory on hand $ 0 Energy efficiency improvements to buildings to be heated (within past 5 years or committed prior to proposed project completion) $ 0 Other In-Kind match to be provided $56,286 2.7.4 Other grant funds to be provided $ 0 2.7.5 Other grant applications not yet approved $ 0 2.7.6 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 through 2.7.4) $ 1,766,111 Project Costs & Benefits (Summary of total project costs including work to date and future cost estimates to get to a fully operational project) 2.7.7 Total Project Cost Summary from Cost Worksheet, Section 4.4.4, including estimates through construction. $ 1,957,261 2.7.8 Additional Performance Monitoring Equipment not covered by the project but required for the Grant Only applicable to construction phase projects. $ 25,945 (Grant Requested for Operations Equipment; KGB in-kind match for reporting) 2.7.9 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $ 2.7.10 Other Public Benefit If you can calculate the benefit in terms of dollars please provide that number here and explain how you calculated that number in Section 5 below. $ Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 6 of 26 7/2/2013 SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application. 3.1 Project Manager Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include contact information, a resume and references for the manager(s). In the electronic submittal, please submit resumes as separate PDFs if the applicant would like those excluded from the web posting of this application. If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management support. If the applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section. The Borough intends to release a Request for Proposals to hire a Project Manager that will be able to provide the appropriate guidance and recommendations to the Borough to ensure that the project is designed and executed to the maximum efficiencies that control scope and bring costs in line also keeping projects on schedule. In house project over-site will be conducted by the Managers for both facilities. For the Ketchikan International Airport it will be Mike Carney, Airport Manager. For the Ketchikan High School it will be Mike Williams, District Maintenance Superintendent. 3.2 Project Schedule and Milestones Please fill out the schedule below. Be sure to identify key tasks and decision points in in your project along with estimated start and end dates for each of the milestones and tasks. Please clearly identify the beginning and ending of all phases of your proposed project. Please fill out form provided below. You may add additional rows as needed. KGB-High School1 1. Design and feasibility requirements completed 7/1/2014 8/1/2014 Confirm Completion of Design and Feasibility Requirements 7/1/2014 7/15/2014 Confirm Resource Availability 7/1/2014 8/1/2014 2. Bid documents completed 7/15/2014 10/15/2014 Solicit RFQ for Construction and Installation 7/15/2014 10/15/2014 3. Vendor selected and award in place 10/15/2014 12/31/2014 Negotiate Vendor Contract 10/15/2014 10/31/2014 Construction Plan and Schedule 11/1/2014 12/31/2014 4. Construction Site Grading and Container Pad 5/1/2015 6/1/2015 Process Equipment 6/1/2015 7/15/2015 Utility Hook-ups 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 Construction Monitoring 5/1/2015 8/15/2015 Actively track project costs against the project budget 5/1/2015 8/15/2015 Environmental Monitoring 6/15/2015 8/15/2015 Modifications to final design during construction 5/1/2015 8/15/2015 5. Integration and testing 6/15/2015 8/15/2015 Piping and Interconnection to Energy Users 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 Commissioning Plan and Schedule 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 Coordination of conversion, integration, or surplus of existing system 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 7. Final acceptance, commissioning and start-up complete 8/15/2015 9/31/2015 Commisisoning of Equipment - Start up 8/15/2015 9/1/2015 Update business plans and power purchase agreements (as needed)9/1/2015 9/30/2015 8. Operations reporting *7/1/2014 9/30/2015 Operations and Reporting Equipment 7/1/2014 9/30/2015 Continuous monitoring to verify and update projections and system efficiency 9/30/2015 n/a Milestones Tasks Start Date Anticipated Completion Date Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 7 of 26 7/2/2013 Ketchikan Airport1 1. Design and feasibility requirements completed 7/1/2014 8/1/2014 Confirm Completion of Design and Feasibility Requirements 7/1/2014 7/15/2014 Confirm Resource Availability 7/1/2014 8/1/2014 2. Bid documents completed 7/15/2014 10/15/2014 Solicit RFQ for Construction and Installation 7/15/2014 10/15/2014 3. Vendor selected and award in place 10/15/2014 12/31/2014 Negotiate Vendor Contract 10/15/2014 10/31/2014 Construction Plan and Schedule 11/1/2014 12/31/2014 4. Construction Process Equipment 6/1/2015 7/15/2015 Utility Hook-ups 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 Construction Monitoring 5/1/2015 8/15/2015 Actively track project costs against the project budget 5/1/2015 8/15/2015 Environmental Monitoring 6/15/2015 8/15/2015 Modifications to final design during construction 5/1/2015 8/15/2015 5. Integration and testing 6/15/2015 8/15/2015 Piping and Interconnection to Energy Users 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 Commissioning Plan and Schedule 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 Coordination of conversion, integration, or surplus of existing system 7/15/2015 8/15/2015 6. Decommissioning of old system complete 6/1/2015 6/15/2015 Decommission Old Heating System 6/1/2015 6/15/2015 7. Final acceptance, commissioning and start-up complete 8/15/2015 9/31/2015 Commisisoning of Equipment - Start up 8/15/2015 9/1/2015 Update business plans and power purchase agreements (as needed)9/15/2015 9/30/2015 8. Operations reporting 7/1/2014 9/30/2015 Operations and Reporting*7/1/2014 9/30/2015 Continuous monitoring to verify and update projections and system efficiency 9/30/2015 n/a Milestones Tasks Start Date Anticipated Completion Date NOTE: Implementation of Ketchikan Airport and Ketchikan Gateway Borough High School projects are anticipated to be implemented on the same schedule yielding cost and schedule efficiencies. 3.3 Project Resources Describe the personnel, contractors, accounting or bookkeeping personnel or firms, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an attachment to your application. The following employess will also help oversee various areas of the project: Ketchikan Airport Project: Mike Carney, Ketchikan Airport, Project Manager Mike has 30 plus years in the industry and has been the project manager or involved with over Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 8 of 26 7/2/2013 $70 million dollars of projects over the last eight years. Mike Houts, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Finance Director Mike has over 30 years of financial management experience Specializing in accounting systems for Forest Products and Construction Companies. Maureen Crosby, CPA., Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Controller Maureen has been a Certified Public Accountant for 13 years, and has been in public accounting for nearly 20. Amy Briggs, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Procurement Officer As the Borough’s Procurement Officer, Amy has worked as both Project Administrator and Grant Administrator for several years. She has been directly involved in the procurement of millions of dollars in goods and services utilizing grant funds. She is also the Borough’s contract writer. Ketchikan High School Project: Mike Williams, Ketchikan School District, Project Manager Mike Williams is the supervisor of all School District buildings and grounds, Mike has over 30 years in the maintenance and construction field. For the last 7 years he has been responsible for the maintenance of all the Borough School buildings totalling $90 million in assets. In 2011 he managed the $3.4 million re-roof of the Ketchikan High School. In 2013 will be managing the Valley park Elementary school reroof costing $1.7 million. Matt Groves, Ketchikan School District, Administration and Contracting Matt has over 6 years experience as the Business Manager for the Ketchikan Gateway Borough School District. Matt currently manages a $41 million dollar budget, $30 million general fund, with a large portion of the remaining $11 million in grant funds. 3.4 Project Communications Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status. Please provide an alternative contact person and their contact information. The Ketchikan Gateway Borough project manager will be responsible for project monitoring and direct contact with AEA. The project manager will, at a minimum, provide AEA with monthly progress reports, report dispersal of grant funds, and organize monthly update meetings. Progress Reports Written progress reports will highlight activities undertaken with dates, results achieved, progress towards stated milestones, and outline any unexpected delays, problems or difficulty that arise as the project progresses. Reports will be submitted on a monthly basis. Financial Reports Concurrent with the progress reports, a financial report will be submitted. This report will outline the utilization and dispersal of grant funding for the month, and over the life of the project. This report will also actively track project costs against the project budget. Propose budget modifications and manage cost overruns, as needed. Monthly Meetings Monthly meetings will take place via conference call or in person at a mutually agreed upon time. Meetings will routinely take place 3-5 business days after progress and financial reports Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 9 of 26 7/2/2013 are submitted. This is intended to allow AEA the opportunity to review the reports and ask questions regarding project progress and grant utilization. Monitoring and Performance Reporting Plan Regular monitoring and performance will be documented and submitted to AEA for approval. This will include continuous monitoring to verify and update projections and system efficiency. 3.5 Project Risk Discuss potential problems and how you would address them. Risk is extremely low for the Ketchikan Gateway Borough Biomass Energy Project. Common sources of risk such as financial instability, siting concerns, feedstock availability and public perception are identified in the projects’ Feasibility Studies. Funding has been largely secured as noted in section 4.4.1 through various sources. Siting of the project will occur within the footprint of existing systems, or within property already held and in use by the applicant. Public support for the project is very high, as this is a project proposed by the community for the benefit of the community. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to see these ends accomplished as the old boilers are quickly becoming outdated, and are in urgent need of replacement. SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS  The level of information will vary according to phase(s) of the project you propose to undertake with grant funds.  If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. For pre-construction applications, describe the resource to the extent known. For design and permitting or construction projects, please provide feasibility documents, design documents, and permitting documents (if applicable) as attachments to this application. Pellet fuels are the most consistent of all biomass feedstocks. Pre-processing of pellets to standard specifications greatly reduces compatibility problems and operational issues with combustion equipment. It is anticipated that the project will seek Pellet Fuels Institute Standard- grade fuel pellets and equipment will be engineered to handle this grade. The higher allowable ash content in the Standard-grade pellet can be made from non-merchantable biomass containing some bark rather than the clean white heartwood required for Premium-grade pellets. Equipment designed for Standard grade pellets will accept Premium-grade pellets if that is the only supply availability. It is expected that the recommended pellet boiler equipment be capable of processing microchip fuel should that become available in the area. Fuel pellet specifications can be found at the Pellet Fuels Institute website http://pelletheat.org/pfi- Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 10 of 26 7/2/2013 standards/pfi-standards-program/. Feedstock will be delivered via bulk truckload delivery by fuel contractor.  Amount: Combined approximately 1,230 tons/year  Pricing: 500 Tons/year over 5 years. $275/ton  Infrastructure Requirements: Pellet Silo1, feed Auger 4.1.2 For Biomass Projects Only Identify any wood inventory questions, such as:  Ownership/Accessibility. Who owns the land and are their limitations and restrictions to accessing the biomass resource?  Inventory data. How much biomass is available on an annual basis and what types (species) are there, if known? The Ketchikan Gateway Borough is committed to using locally sourced woody biomass in order to support Alaskan business. KGB has previously contacted Tongass Forest Enterprises to secure a long term supply of wood pellets. Tongass Forest Enterprises has identified two local entities from which they will be purchasing pulp-grade wood to produce wood pellets.  Leask Lakes sale  Brown mountain road boundary sale In a letter to the Borough, Tongass is on record as offering contracts up to 5 years in length, for volumes exceeding 500 tons/year at a price that is financially viable for this project. Southeast Alaska as a whole has an opportunity, and perhaps a need to leverage woody biomass resources for energy purposes. In a 2010 study conducted by the USFS entitled “Economic Analysis of Southeast Alaska: Envisioning a Sustainable Economy with Thriving Communities”, it is noted that: “A potential young growth market is biomass energy, although the potential remains unclear. Current demand for biomass in Southeast Alaska is relatively small; wood chips and other mill wastes are sufficient to meet local heating demands. But diesel is widely used for power and heat in Southeast Alaska, and biomass might be developed into a more cost-effective energy sources. Wood fiber produced from thinning young forests might be processed into wood pellets and other energy sources if demand comes to exceed supply of wastes.” This same report notes that 400,000 acres of Tongass National Forest are in young growth of various native species, thus ensuring an ample supply for this and other wood energy projects in the area. 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Heating Energy System Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation. The space heating system at Ketchikan Airport currently consists of two 1971 Cleaver Brooks oil- fired boilers with combined nameplate output of 5.36 MMBTU/hr and a peak operating efficiency Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 11 of 26 7/2/2013 of 72%. These boilers are at the end of their economic life and are scheduled for replacement. Replacing the system with two new oil-fired boilers has been estimated to cost $700-800 thousand. Retrofitting a pellet fuel system specified at 1.5 MMBTU/hr (28% the size of existing units) with electricity backup is expected to cost $589,684. Ketchikan High School also uses fuel oil –fired boilers, and is heated by three units, one at 3.7 MMBTU/hr and two at 4.07 MMBTU/hr. The project feasibility study specifies one 4.7 MMBTU/hr pellet-fuel system in a stand-alone boiler housing. Existing oil-fired boiler equipment can be salvaged for use after installation of a pellet-fired heating system, and can account for 15% of average load requirements and peak heating needs, reducing capital cost and scale required for the pellet system. 4.2.2 Existing Heating Energy Resources Used Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources. The primary fuel source presently used to generate heat in the Ketchikan Gateway Borough is fuel oil. The physical properties of fuel oil are well understood, and the current price in Ketchikan for fuel oil #2 is $3.53-$3.59/gallon. The proposed project will help the city by reducing the use of expensive fuel oil. The key impact on infrastructure will involve changing buildings from liquid to solid fuel storage systems. This is anticipated to be accomplished by erecting storage facilities adjacent to the heating buildings. 4.2.3 Existing Heating Energy Market Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy customers. The proposed project does not anticipated selling heat on the open market. It is intended to offset present use of heating oil for boilers operated by the applicant. At present, total fuel oil usage is over 111,000 Gallons per year, with a fuel price of approximately $3.53-$3.59/gallon of fuel oil. 4.3 Proposed System Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address potential system design, land ownership, permits, energy efficiency and environmental issues. 4.3.1 System Design Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:  A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 12 of 26 7/2/2013  Optimum installed capacity  Anticipated capacity factor  Anticipated annual generation  Anticipated barriers  Basic integration concept  Delivery methods  Energy efficiency measures (building envelope) The Ketchikan Borough is proposing the construction of two boiler systems that will be located at Ketchikan Airport and Ketchikan Gateway Borough High School. Preliminary feasibility studies have been performed for both systems and can be found in the appendix. These systems are not physically connected and transfer of materials or thermal energy between the two is not anticipated. Pelleted woody biomass fuel will be produced by an independent biomass vendor, and transported to Ketchikan by barge. The wood pellets will then be transported to the boiler sites, via truck. The first system will be placed at the existing Ketchikan Airport. The current heating system in the complex for the first system (32,000 sq. ft.) consists of 2 Cleaver Brooks oil fired boilers installed in 1971. They supply heating and domestic hot water to the facility. These oil-fired boilers are at the end of their economic life and are scheduled for replacement. Based on feasibility study data, it is proposed that they be replaced with a 450kW Wood Pellet boiler and a 360kW electrical backup. These boilers will replace the existing boilers both in utility and location. Therefore, no additional infrastructure will be required to house the boilers. Adjacent to the boiler building, a pellet silo will be erected. An auger will run between the pellet silo and the boiler building for feedstock transfer from storage to the boiler. In this way, fuel flow will be highly automated. System ash will be removed manually according to vendor specifications and transported to the local landfill. The second system will be placed at Ketchikan High School. The heating area of this system is approximately 110,000 square feet and is presently serviced by one 3,770,000 Btu/hr output hot water boiler and two 4,070,000 Btu/hr output hot water boilers. The existing boilers run on fuel oil, are original to renovation work in the mid 1990’s and are in good condition. However, a recent feasibility study estimates that a 4.7 MMBtu/hr hot water boiler would be sufficient to meet base load demands. It is further estimated that meeting this base load would represent approximately 85% of the facility’s thermal usage in a given year. One or more of the existing boilers will remain to accommodate peak loads and biomass boiler downtime. Because the existing boilers are to remain in place, it is anticipated that additional housing will be required for the new boiler system. A standalone boiler building will be erected to meet this need. Adjacent to the boiler building, a pellet silo will be erected. An auger will run between the pellet silo and the boiler building for feedstock transfer from storage to the boiler. In this way, fuel flow will be highly automated. System ash will be removed manually according to vendor specifications and transported to the local landfill. 4.3.2 Land Ownership Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or how you intend to approach land ownership obtain harvest contracts and access issues. Land anticipated to be used for construction of this project is owned by the applicant. Biomass harvested for use in this project will be locally sourced, but ownership issues associated Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 13 of 26 7/2/2013 with biomass harvest will be the domain of the biomass supplier, not the applicant. 4.3.3 Permits Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address outstanding permit issues.  List of applicable permits  Anticipated permitting timeline  Identify and discussion of potential barriers The project will likely trigger the needs for several permitting and regulatory requirements to be approved for operation. These permits may include various federal, state and local environmental, construction and land use permits. It is likely that both facilities will be below the air permitting requirements pursuant to Alaska Air Quality Regulations 18-AAC-50. An Air Quality Feasibility Study was conducted by Resource Systems Group, Inc. in conjunction with the Ketchikan High School Feasibility Study (Ketchikan HS Pre-Feasibility Assessment, Appendix 1B) which determined that project would not require an air permit. The Ketchikan Airport facility is assumed to be accessible to the same exemption, but may be required to obtain additional permitting per FAA regulations. This will be reviewed early in the engineering and permitting process under this proposed grant. Other permits are expected to be required, including EPA construction general permit and NPDES storm water permit (for High School facility building construction only) local construction and operating approvals, and Boiler permitting and boiler operator licenses per Alaska Statutes, Sec. 18.60.210 (a) (9), and Sec. 18.60.395 (b) (2), respectively. It is not expected that these permitting and regulatory procedures will impact the overall project schedule or scope 4.3.4 Environmental Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be addressed:  Threatened or endangered species  Habitat issues  Wetlands and other protected areas  Archaeological and historical resources  Land development constraints  Telecommunications interference  Aviation considerations  Visual, aesthetics impacts  Identify and discuss other potential barriers  Threatened or endangered species /Habitat Issues o No endangered or threatened species will be impacted by the construction of this project. o Biomass will only be purchased from vendors who practice sustainable harvesting techniques.  Wetlands and other protected areas o Biomass will only be purchased from vendors who practice sustainable harvesting techniques.  Archaeological and historical resources Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 14 of 26 7/2/2013 o Construction will take place within the footprint of existing facilities which have undergone assessments for archaeological and historically significant sites.  Land development constraints o None anticipated  Telecommunications interference o None anticipated. Infrastructure will be at height with surrounding buildings.  Aviation considerations o None anticipated. Infrastructure will be at height with surrounding buildings. 4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues (Total Estimated Costs and Projected Revenues) The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of their cost data. For example: Applicants records or analysis, industry standards, consultant or manufacturer’s estimates. 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the project. Cost information should include the following:  Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase  Requested grant funding  Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind  Identification of other funding sources  Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system  Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system A detailed financial analysis supporting the costs associated with this project can be found in Appendix H. A summary of the requested parameters is provided below: Total anticipated project cost $1,957,261 Cost for this phase $1,766,111 Requested grant funding $1,412,889 Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind $353,222 Identification of other funding sources $143,393 from the USDA WBUG Grant 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the applicant. (Note: Operational costs are not eligible for grant funds however grantees are required to meet ongoing reporting requirements for the purpose of reporting impacts of projects on the communities they serve.) Annual O&M costs for the new facilities have been estimated by previous feasibility studies to be Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 15 of 26 7/2/2013 approximately $15,000 per year. This is in addition to an estimated annual fuel cost of $368,100 per year. It is important to note that these boilers will be replacing existing systems. Thus, the O&M costs as well as fuel costs will be borne by the applicant using funds previously budgeted for the existing system. These costs are anticipated to represent a significant improvement over the status quo. 4.4.3 Heat Purchase/Sale The heat purchase/sale information should include the following:  Identification of potential energy buyer(s)/customer(s)  Potential heat purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range  Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project Heat generated from the proposed system would be used by the applicant, and thus will not be made available for sale. The primary revenue stream for this project, is then avoided costs of energy purchases. 4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in evaluating the project. Please fill out the form provided below and provide most recent heating fuel invoice that supports the amount identified in “Project Benefits” subpart b below. Renewable Energy Source The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis. Annual average resource availability. In excess of the required 1227 tons/year Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel) Existing Heating Energy Generation and Usage a) Basic configuration i. Number of generators/boilers/other 5 ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 2units @ 5.36 MMBTU/hr, 2units @ 4.07 MMBTU/hr 1 unit @3.7MMBTU/hr iii. Generator/boilers/other type Boilers iv. Age of generators/boilers/other 30-40 Years v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other 72% b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Annual O&M cost for labor $8,876 ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor $8,825 Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 16 of 26 7/2/2013 c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Electricity [kWh] 0 ii. Fuel usage Diesel [gal] 0 Other 0 iii. Peak Load 0 iv. Average Load 0 v. Minimum Load 0 vi. Efficiency 0 vii. Future trends 0 d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] 111,033 Gallons ii. Electricity [kWh] 0 iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] 0 iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] 0 v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] 0 vi. Other 0 Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage (Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels) a) Proposed renewable capacity (Wind, Hydro, Biomass, other) [kW or MMBtu/hr] Woody Biomass Pellets 1 Unit @ 4625 MBH 1 Unit @ 1535 MBH b) Proposed annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable) i. Electricity [kWh] ii. Heat [MMBtu] 14,085 c) Proposed annual fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] 0 ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu] 0 iii. Wood or pellets [cords, green tons, dry tons] 1227 iv. Other 0 Project Cost a) Total capital cost of new system $1,041,603 b) Development cost $897,930 c) Annual O&M cost of new system $15,000 Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 17 of 26 7/2/2013 d) Annual fuel cost $368,100 Project Benefits a) Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity ii. Heat 111,033 gallons of #2 heating oil iii. Transportation b) Current price of displaced fuel $3.59/gallon c) Other economic benefits d) Alaska public benefits Fuel oil can be diverted for necessary electricity production. Heat Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for heat purchase/sale N/A Project Analysis a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio 3.35 @ 20 Years (High School) Payback (years) 8.1 (High School) 20 (Airport) 4.4.5 Building Efficiency Please address the following items related to the proposed location of the heating project. If more than one building will be impacted, please address this information for each building. The table below displays the requested data for both buildings effected by this grant proposal. The requested energy audits may be found in the appendix. Building name Airport Terminal High School Type or primary usage of the building Airport Terminal High School Location 1000 Airport Terminal Way, Ketchikan, AK 99901 2610 4th Ave Ketchikan, AK 99901 Hours of operation Daily from 5:45 am to 9:30 pm Monday -Friday 6am-9pm Single structure or multiple units Single Structure Single Structure Total square footage 32,600 180,614 Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 18 of 26 7/2/2013 Electrical consumption per year None relating to building heat None relating to building heat Heating oil/fuel consumption per year 22,700 127,900 Average number of occupants Staff - 85 Passengers - 600/ day Local traffic - 350 /day Students – 560 Staff - 40 Has an energy audit been performed? When? Please provide a copy of the energy audit, if applicable. Yes – Oct 2011 Yes – Nov 2012 Have building thermal energy efficiency upgrades been completed? No No SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following:  Potential annual fuel displacement (gallons and dollars) over the lifetime of the evaluated renewable energy project. In order for the applicant to receive credit for heating fuel displaced the applicant must provide the most recent invoice for heating fuel purchased.  Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Heat Purchase Agreement price, RCA tariff, or cost based rate)  Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits)  Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or programs that might be available)  Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project Bioenergy facility construction produces multiple positive effects for a region or locality in which the facility is built. Firstly, it will displace the use of heating oil in the project’s effected area. Over a 20 year lifespan, the proposed system would displace over 2.20 Million gallons of diesel fuel, worth nearly $8 Million in today’s dollars. This displacement will save the Borough over 600 thousand dollars in direct fuel costs. Engineering and construction jobs will also be created during plant construction, and jobs for personnel to manage and operate the facility are also created. Indirect jobs and industries also benefit from the feedstock and other supply materials logistical requirements of the facility. The facility support impacts spread further and affect more industries than the facility itself. Known as multipliers, these effects are often far greater than the direct production of the facility. Ketchikan Gateway Borough will give local construction contractors preferential bidding status through the design process, to provide specific local building code and design conditions experience to the team. This will locally distribute funding dollars throughout the project. A number of qualified firms are available to provide construction contracting services to the project through the construction phase. Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 19 of 26 7/2/2013 Upon completion, the project is expected to create several direct full time positions for each facility in the form of qualified boiler operators. Additional job creation benefits will spread far into the community, including local pellet fuel providers, forest industry, civil and electrical facility maintenance services, and other local industries. A region-wide expansion to pellet fuel heat can produce cost savings on the order of $2.1 billion in cumulative net worth over a 50-yr period while increasing job opportunities and reinvesting capital directly into the community. SECTION 6– SUSTAINABILITY Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a minimum:  Proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered.  How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project  Identification of operational issues that could arise.  A description of operational costs including on-going support for any back-up or existing systems that may be require to continue operation  Commitment to reporting the savings and benefits Proposed business structure: This project will maintain a high level of stability, in part because all resources will be used internally within the borough. There will be no sale of products, and thus no need for complicated business structures and payouts. How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project  Funding has been secured for substantial portions of the overall project. The Airport has $1,197,500 in funds available in a legislative grant. These funds will be divided between 1) replacing the failing airport terminal heating system as per the proposed biomass heating project, and 2) making other energy saving improvements.  Planning is underway to secure the remainder of the financing for the High School. The School District anticipates applying for CIP funds in FY 2013 for disbursement in FY 2015.  In-kind matching funds will be provided by the Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Ketchikan Airport, and Ketchikan School District to oversee and internally manage the project. Operational Costs  Fuel costs will be borne by the applicant in much the same way that it currently is with the diesel boiler system. Fuel is anticipated to be purchased from local suppliers at a rate of $300/ton of pellets.  Labor will be provided by employees who operate existing boiler units. SECTION 7 – READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS Discuss what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed with work once your grant is approved. Tell us what you may have already accomplished on the project to date and identify other grants that may have been previously awarded for this project and the degree you have been able to Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 20 of 26 7/2/2013 meet the requirements of previous grants. Prior to apply for grant funding from AEA, the Ketchikan Gateway Borough has taken multiple steps to ensure project success. Third party engineering firms have been hired to perform energy audits for all effected facilities, and to perform feasibility studies regarding construction of the proposed biomass boilers. These reports may be found in the appendix. Data from these studies was used to apply for the USFS Woody Biomass Utilization Grant. The Borough received $129,210 in grant funding from the USFS Woody Biomass Utilization Grant in May of 2013, which will be used to fund final design of facilities. The Borough is currently in the process of sending out a bid for design services. Further funding has also been secured for substantial portions of the overall project. The Airport has $1,197,500 in funds available in a legislative grant. These funds will be divided between 1) replacing the failing airport terminal heating system as per the proposed biomass heating project, and 2) making other energy saving improvements. Planning is underway to secure the remainder of the financing for the High School. The School District anticipates applying for CIP funds in FY 2013 for disbursement in FY 2015. SECTION 8 – LOCAL SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION Discuss local support and opposition, known or anticipated, for the project. Include letters of support or other documentation of local support from the community that would benefit from this project. The Documentation of support must be dated within one year of the RFA date of July 2, 2013. This project has been proposed by the community for the benefit of the community. This construction is anticipated to create local jobs, improve local infrastructure, and As such, support is very high as is the desire to act swiftly. Letters of support can be found in the appendices. SECTION 9 – GRANT BUDGET Tell us how much you are seeking in grant funds. Include any investments to date and funding sources, how much is being requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an applicant. Provide a narrative summary regarding funding sources and your financial commitment to the project Please provide a short narrative, and cost estimate, identifying the metering equipment, and its related use to comply with the operations reporting requirement identified in Section 3.15 of the Request for Applications. Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 21 of 26 7/2/2013 Applications MUST include a separate worksheet for each project phase that was identified in section 2.3.2 of this application, (I. Reconnaissance, II. Feasibility and Conceptual Design, III. Final Design and Permitting, and IV. Construction and Commissioning). Please use the tables provided below to detail your proposed project’s budget. Be sure to use one table for each phase of your project. If you have any question regarding how to prepare these tables or if you need assistance preparing the application please feel free to contact AEA at 907-771-3031 or by emailing the Grant Administrator, Shawn Calfa, at scalfa@aidea.org. Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 22 of 26 7/2/2013 KGB – High School RE- Fund Grantee Matching Source of Matching Funds: Grant Funds Funds Cash/In- kind/Federal Grants/Other State Grants/Other 1. Design and feasibility requirements completed 8/1/2014 $12,000 $3,000 in-kind $15,000 7/15/2014 8/1/2014 2. Bid documents completed 10/15/2014 $13,600 $3,400 in-kind $17,000 10/15/2014 3. Vendor selected and award in place 12/31/2014 $546,400 $136,600 cash $683,000 10/31/2014 12/31/2014 4. Construction Site Grading and Container Pad 6/1/2015 $7,687 $1,922 cash $9,609 Process Equipment 7/15/2015 $108,336 $27,084 cash $135,420 Utility Hook-ups 8/15/2015 $16,000 $4,000 cash $20,000 Construction Monitoring 8/15/2015 $14,080 $3,520 cash $17,600 Actively track project costs against the project budget 8/15/2015 $5,600 $1,400 In-kind $7,000 Environmental Monitoring 8/15/2015 $8,000 $2,000 In-kind $10,000 Modifications to final design during construction 8/15/2015 $156,862 $39,215 cash $196,077 5. Integration and testing 8/15/2015 $8,000 $2,000 in-kind $10,000 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 7. Final acceptance, commissioning and start-up complete 9/31/2015 $32,000 $8,000 in-kind $40,000 9/1/2015 9/30/2015 8. Operations reporting *9/30/2015 $12,609 $3,152 in-kind $15,761 9/30/2015 n/a TOTALS $941,174 $235,293 $1,176,467 Direct Labor & Benefits $$$44,761 Travel & Per Diem $$$20,000 Equipment $$$683,000 Materials & Supplies $$$216,077 Contractual Services $$$27,600 Construction Services $$$185,029 Other $$ TOTALS $$$1,176,467 *The Authority will work with the grantee to implement this required reporting. The cost of any equipment to monitor the system performance should be included in the project cost. Any equipment needed to fulfill the grant’s monitoring requirements that are not already project costs should be included in section 2.7.8 of the application form. TOTALS Budget Categories: Milestones Anticipated Completion Date Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 23 of 26 7/2/2013 Ketchikan Airport RE- Fund Grantee Matching Source of Matching Funds: Grant Funds Funds Cash/In- kind/Federal Grants/Other State Grants/Other 1. Design and feasibility requirements completed 8/1/2014 $12,000 $3,000 in-kind $15,000 7/15/2014 8/1/2014 2. Bid documents completed 10/15/2014 $16,000 $4,000 in-kind $20,000 10/15/2014 3. Vendor selected and award in place 12/31/2014 $133,600 $33,400 cash $167,000 10/31/2014 12/31/2014 4. Construction Process Equipment 7/15/2015 $80,080 $20,020 cash $100,100 Utility Hook-ups 8/15/2015 $32,000 $8,000 cash $40,000 Construction Monitoring 8/15/2015 $14,080 $3,520 cash $17,600 Actively track project costs against the project budget 8/15/2015 $16,000 $4,000 In-kind $20,000 Environmental Monitoring 8/15/2015 $8,000 $2,000 In-kind $10,000 Modifications to final design during construction 8/15/2015 $78,619 $19,655 cash $98,274 5. Integration and testing 8/15/2015 $24,000 $6,000 in-kind $30,000 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 6. Decommissioning of old system complete 6/15/2015 $12,000 $3,000 in-kind $15,000 6/15/2015 7. Final acceptance, commissioning and start-up complete 9/31/2015 $32,000 $8,000 in-kind $40,000 9/1/2015 9/30/2015 8. Operations reporting 9/30/2015 $13,336 $3,334 in-kind $16,670 9/30/2015 n/a TOTALS $471,715 $117,929 $589,644 Direct Labor & Benefits $$$75,000 Travel & Per Diem $$$20,000 Equipment $$$167,000 Materials & Supplies $$$100,100 Contractual Services $$$102,600 Construction Services $$$124,944 Other $$ TOTALS $$$589,644 *The Authority will work with the grantee to implement this required reporting. The cost of any equipment to monitor the system performance should be included in the project cost. Any equipment needed to fulfill the grant’s monitoring requirements that are not already project costs should be included in section 2.7.8 of the application form. TOTALS Budget Categories: Milestones Anticipated Completion Date Renewable Energy Fund Round VII Grant Application - Heat Projects AEA 2014-006 Grant Application Page 24 of 26 7/2/2013 Project Milestones that should be addressed in Budget Proposal Reconnaissance Feasibility Design and Permitting Construction 1. Project scoping and contractor solicitation. 2. Resource identification and analysis 3. Land use, permitting, and environmental analysis 4. Preliminary design analysis and cost 5. Cost of energy and market analysis 6. Simple economic analysis 7. Final report and recommendations 1. Project scoping and contractor solicitation. 2. Detailed energy resource analysis 3. Identification of land and regulatory issues, 4. Permitting and environmental analysis 5. Detailed analysis of existing and future energy costs and markets 6. Assessment of alternatives 7. Conceptual design analysis and cost estimate 8. Detailed economic and financial analysis 9, Conceptual business and operations plans 10. Final report and recommendations 1. Project scoping and contractor solicitation for planning and design 2. Permit applications (as needed) 3. Final environmental assessment and mitigation plans (as needed) 4. Resolution of land use, right of way issues 5. Permit approvals 6. Final system design 7. Engineers cost estimate 8. Updated economic and financial analysis 9. Negotiated power sales agreements with approved rates 10. Final business and operational plan 1. Confirmation that all design and feasibility requirements are complete. 2. Completion of bid documents 3. Contractor/vendor selection and award 4. Construction Phases – Each project will have unique construction phases, limitations, and schedule constraints which should be identified by the grantee 5. Integration and testing 6. Decommissioning old systems 7. Final Acceptance, Commissioning and Start-up 8. Operations Reporting