HomeMy WebLinkAboutGrantApplication6_Tenakee_NO RESUMES
GRANT APPLICATION
– FOR –
INDIAN RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION
SEPTEMBER 2012
– SUBMITTED TO –
ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY
RENEWABLE ENERGY GRANT PROGRAM – ROUND VI
RFA #AEA-13-006
– SUBMITTED BY –
CITY OF TENAKEE SPRINGS, ALASKA
P.O. BOX 52
TENAKEE SPRINGS, AK 99841
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA 13-006 Application Page 1 of 21 7/3/2011
Application Forms and Instructions
This instruction page and the following grant application constitutes the Grant Application Form
for Round 6 of the Renewable Energy Fund. An electronic version of the Request for
Applications (RFA) and this form are available online at:
http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE_Fund-6.html
If you need technical assistance filling out this application, please contact Shawn Calfa,
the Alaska Energy Authority Grant Administrator at (907) 771-3031 or at
scalfa@aidea.org.
If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application
forms for each project.
Multiple phases for the same project may be submitted as one application.
If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide
milestones and grant budget for each phase of the project.
In order to ensure that grants provide sufficient benefit to the public, AEA may limit
recommendations for grants to preliminary development phases in accordance with 3
ACC 107.605(1).
If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting
funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the
preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in
reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with
your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed.
REMINDER:
Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act AS 40.25, and materials
submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no
statutory exemptions apply.
All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final
recommendations are made to the legislature.
In accordance with 3 AAC 107.630 (b) Applicants may request trade secrets or
proprietary company data be kept confidential subject to review and approval by the
Authority. If you want information is to be kept confidential the applicant must:
o Request the information be kept confidential.
o Clearly identify the information that is the trade secret or proprietary in their
application.
o Receive concurrence from the Authority that the information will be kept
confidential. If the Authority determines it is not confidential it will be treated as a
public record in accordance with AS 40.25 or returned to the applicant upon
request.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 2 of 21 7/3//2012
SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal)
CITY OF TENAKEE SPRINGS DBA TENAKEE SPRINGS ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
Type of Entity: LOCAL GOVERNMENT / PUBLIC ELECTRIC UTILITY Fiscal Year End SEPTEMBER 30
Tax ID # 92-0048310 Tax Status: For-profit or X non-profit ( check one)
Mailing Address
PO BOX 52
TENAKEE SPRINGS, AK 99841
Physical Address
TENAKEE SPRINGS COMMUNITY BULDING
TENAKEE AVENUE
Telephone
907-736-2207
Fax
907-736-2207
Email
citytke@gmail.com
1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT / GRANTS MANAGER
Name
Arthur Bloom
Title
Vice Mayor, City Councilman, Hydropower Project Manager
Mailing Address
PO BOX 52
TENAKEE SPRINGS, AK 99841
Telephone
907-736-2222
Fax
907-736-2207
Email
artmbloom@gmail.com
1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your
application will be rejected.
1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box)
X An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS
42.05, or
An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or
X A local government, or
A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities);
Yes
1.2.2 Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by
its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the
applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s
governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box )
Yes
1.2.3 As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and
follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant
agreement.
Yes
1.2.4 If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached
grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the
application.)
Yes
1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant
funds for the benefit of the general public. If no please describe the nature of the
project and who will be the primary beneficiaries.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 3 of 21 7/3//2012
SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY
This is intended to be no more than a 1-2 page overview of your project.
2.1 Project Title – (Provide a 4 to 5 word title for your project)
INDIAN RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
2.2 Project Location –
Include the physical location of your project and name(s) of the community or communities that will
benefit from your project in the subsections below.
2.2.1 Location of Project – Latitude and longitude, street address, or community name.
Latitude and longitude coordinates may be obtained from Google Maps by finding you project’s location on the map
and then right clicking with the mouse and selecting “What is here? The coordinates will be displayed in the Google
search window above the map in a format as follows: 61.195676.-149.898663. If you would like assistance obtaining
this information please contact AEA at 907-771-3031.
The project is located on Indian River, approximately one mile east of Tenakee Springs in
Township 47 South, Range 63 East of the Copper River Meridian. This project is located
at approximately 57.788d N, 135.193d W.
2.2.2 Community benefiting – Name(s) of the community or communities that will be the
beneficiaries of the project.
Tenakee Springs, its residents and businesses will benefit from this project.
2.3 PROJECT TYPE
Put X in boxes as appropriate
2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type
Wind Biomass or Biofuels
X Hydro, including run of river Transmission of Renewable Energy
Geothermal, including Heat Pumps Small Natural Gas
Heat Recovery from existing sources Hydrokinetic
Solar Storage of Renewable
Other (Describe)
2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply)
Pre-Construction Construction
Reconnaissance Design and Permitting
Feasibility X Construction and Commissioning
Conceptual Design
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 4 of 21 7/3//2012
2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Provide a brief one paragraph description of your proposed project.
Replace diesel generation of electricity for the community of Tenakee Springs with renewable
hydroelectric power. The City of Tenakee Springs proposes to construct a hydroelectric project
on Indian River. This will be a 180 kW low head, run-of-river plant displacing the use of 31,400
gallons of diesel fuel annually, or 90% of annual electric utility diesel consumption. At least
6,500 additional gallons of fuel oil can be displaced by heating public buildings with excess
energy from the hydro project.
2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT
Briefly discuss the financial and public benefits that will result from this project, (such as reduced fuel
costs, lower energy costs, etc.)
The Tenakee Springs Electric Utility generators use approximately 34,900 gallons of diesel fuel
per year. This project will eliminate about 90% of this annual fuel usage with hydroelectric
generation. Additional diesel offsets can be gained by replacing heating oil with electric heat.
The proposed project would help retain money within the community by stemming the outflow
of money for petroleum products and providing employment during construction and operation.
Additional Public Benefits would be less noise in the community (diesel generators would not be
running most of the time), less pollutants discharged into the air, less risk for environmental
liability, lower cost electricity - especially for commercial entities which currently pay very high
rates, and potential expansion of economic base (fish processing and washeteria).
2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW
Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source
of other contributions to the project.
Construction of the project is estimated to cost $3,320,000. Tenakee Springs requests
$2,988,000 in grant funds with $332,000 in local matching funds to construct this project.
2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY
Include a summary of grant request and your project’s total costs and benefits below.
Grant Costs
(Summary of funds requested)
2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $2,988,000
2.7.2 Cash match to be provided $312,000
2.7.3 In-kind match to be provided $20,000
2.7.4 Other grant applications not yet approved $0
2.7.5 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 through 2.7.3) $3,320,000
Project Costs & Benefits
(Summary of total project costs including work to date and future cost estimates to get to a fully
operational project)
2.7.6 Total Project Cost (Summary from Cost Worksheet
including estimates through construction)
$3,674,000
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 5 of 21 7/3//2012
2.7.7 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $5,086,000
2.7.8 Other Public Benefit (If you can calculate the benefit in
terms of dollars please provide that number here and
explain how you calculated that number in your application
(Section 5.)
No quantifiable financial
benefits, see narrative.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 6 of 21 7/3//2012
SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully
completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application.
3.1 Project Manager
Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include contact information, a
resume and references for the manager(s). If the applicant does not have a project manager
indicate how you intend to solicit project management support. If the applicant expects project
management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section.
Currently, the project manager is Arthur Bloom, an elected member of the city council, vice
mayor, and employee of the city (Hydroelectric Project Manager). Tenakee Springs hired
Polarconsult Alaska, Inc. to complete a feasibility study, conceptual design, permitting, and final
design for the project. Under this contract, Polarconsult is also providing project management
support and guidance. No management assistance from AEA is needed.
3.2 Project Schedule and Milestones
Please fill out the schedule below. Be sure to identify key tasks and decision points in in your
project along with estimated start and end dates for each of the milestones and tasks. Please
clearly identify the beginning and ending of all phases of your proposed project.
Please fill out form provided below. You may add additional rows as needed.
Milestones Tasks Start Date End Date
1. Grant Agreement Sign Grant
Agreement July 2013 Jul 2013
1. Confirmation that all Design / Feasibility
Requirements are Complete July 2013 Jul. 2013
2. Completion of Construction Documents July 2013 Jul 2013 (task 4),
Feb. 2014 (task 5)
3. Contractor(s) / Vendor(s) Selection and
Award July 2013 Jul 2013 (task 4)
April 2014 (task 5)
4. Construction – Year 1
(access roads **) August 2013 Oct. 2013
5. Construction – Year 2
(balance of project)
5a. Transmission Line May 2014 Oct. 2014
5b. Diversion/Intake Structure May 2014 Oct. 2014
5c. Penstock May 2014 Oct. 2014
5d. Powerhouse May 2014 Oct. 2014
5e. Generation Equipment May 2014 Oct. 2014
6. Integration and Testing Oct. 2014 Nov. 2014
7. Final Acceptance, Commissioning, and
Startup Nov. 2014 Dec. 2014
8. Operations Reporting Dec. 2014 Dec 2015
Schedule is based on timely signing of grant agreement. Tasks are based on months from
grant agreement signing.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 7 of 21 7/3//2012
3.3 Project Resources
Describe the personnel, contractors, accounting or bookkeeping personnel or firms, equipment,
and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any partnerships or commitments
with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any
existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or
contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and
suppliers as an attachment to your application.
The city’s existing project team, including Mr. Bloom and Tenakee’s consultant Polarconsult,
has successfully advanced the project through the feasibility and conceptual design phases, and
nearly completed the permitting and design phase as well. All permits for the project are
expected to be issued by the end of 2012, and final designs and construction plans will be
completed by the 1 st quarter of 2013. The City has been very successful at working
collaboratively with state and federal agencies to obtain permits for the hydro project.
The City of Tenakee Springs will follow the methods set forth in its ordinances for procurement
and selection processes during project construction.
3.4 Project Communications
Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status.
Please provide an alternative contact person and their contact information.
Tenakee's Hydro Project Manager will provide regular reports to AEA on current project
activities. Reports will be issued on a more frequent basis as appropriate.
3.5 Project Risk
Discuss potential problems and how you would address them.
This project utilizes proven technology and construction methods. Nearly all permits have been
issued, with the final permit (Corps of Engineers Wetlands Permit) expected by the end of 2012.
Final design is in progress, with 100% construction drawings expected by the end of the 1st
quarter 2013. The primary remaining risk on this project is construction risk, which would most
likely be manifested as increased construction cost. The construction budget includes a 15%
contingency, which should be sufficient to cover any unforeseen expenses. The City and utility
have a variety of options to handle cost overruns on this project. The two major options are to
seek additional grants or secure a loan that would be repaid through the utility rates.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 8 of 21 7/3//2012
SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS
The level of information will vary according to phase(s) of the project you propose to
undertake with grant funds.
If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an
advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are
satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
4.1 Proposed Energy Resource
Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available.
Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be
available for the market to be served by your project. For pre-construction applications, describe the
resource to the extent known. For design and permitting or construction projects, please provide
feasibility documents, design documents, and permitting documents (if applicable) as attachments to
this application.
The hydro project will be a run-of-river project located between falls 4 and falls 2 on Indian River.
The project will have a design flow of 50 cfs, gross head of 63 feet, and installed capacity of 180 kW.
The project will have a capacity factor of 76.2%, average total annual generation of 1,169,000 kWh,
and would supply 90% of Tenakee’s existing electric load of 433,000 kWh. The project provides
significant margin for load growth and/or space heating applications in the community.
The project conceptual design drawings and feasibility study have been previously submitted to AEA,
and are available upon request. Permits issued for the project and other pertinent documents are
included with this application in Attachment E.
4.2 Existing Energy System
4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System
Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the
number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation.
Basic configuration of the existing system is 3 diesel electric generators; 2- 88kW peak and 1-66kW
peak capacity installed in 2007 by AEA Rural Power System Upgrade with new switchgear. The
existing system has an efficiency of about 13 kWh per gallon of fuel. Electricity is distributed
throughout the community via an overhead three phase distribution system.
4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used
Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any
impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources.
Tenakee currently relies 100% on diesel fuel for electric generation. Other energy resources include
gas/diesel for transportation (primarily for local boats / skiffs / ATVs), and a combination of wood
and fuel oil for space and water heating. Many residents use the geothermal hot springs / bath house
for bathing - the bath house is a focal point of the community.
This project will displace approximately 90% of the diesel fuel used for electricity generation.
Significant additional fuel oil or wood used for space heating can also be displaced by this project.
No transportation fuels are expected to be displaced, although electric ATVs / mopeds could be an
appropriate technology for Tenakee.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 9 of 21 7/3//2012
4.2.3 Existing Energy Market
Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy
customers.
Electrical power is used in residential homes, commercial businesses, city buildings, streetlights, and
docks, and the school building. This project will have a profound beneficial impact by lowering
energy costs and making the use of electrical energy for heating of public buildings feasible. Lower
and more stable energy prices will tend to increase electrical demand on the system. Commercial
enterprises in Tenakee Springs particularly suffer under the current energy costs, because they are not
eligible for PCE subsidized rates. Lower energy costs will help to encourage commercial activity in
the community, which will tend to increase electrical demand.
4.3 Proposed System
Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address
potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues.
4.3.1 System Design
Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:
A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location
Optimum installed capacity
Anticipated capacity factor
Anticipated annual generation
Anticipated barriers
Basic integration concept
Delivery methods
The project will include the following components:
1. A concrete diversion structure located at the head of falls 4 at an elevation of 126 feet. The
structure will be co-located with an existing vertical slot fish pass built by the US Forest Service.
The diversion will not impound a significant amount of water.
2. An intake structure utilizing an inclined plate overflow screen (coanda-type screen) intake to
screen water from the creek and admit it to the project penstock.
3. An above-ground 36-inch diameter 1,534 foot long penstock supported on trestles and on grade.
4. A powerhouse fitted with a variable flow cross-flow turbine coupled to a three-phase synchronous
generator via a gear box speed increaser.
5. 4,000 feet of transmission line to interconnect the hydro power house with the existing Tenakee
electrical distribution system near the harbor.
The project’s installed capacity will be 180 kW. The capacity factor is 76.2%. Annual energy
generation capability is approximately 1,169,000 kWh. Controls will enable the hydro powerhouse to
run the entire electric system, or run in parallel with the diesel plant. When the diesels need to run,
the controls will run them at optimal loadings to the extent practical to maintain high fuel economy
and avoid wet stacking or other adverse operating conditions.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 10 of 21 7/3//2012
4.3.2 Land Ownership
Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or
how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues.
The project will be located on a combination of city and state land, and access from tidewater will be
via a US Forest Service logging road. Alaska DNR issued a Final Decision to grant the city
easements needed for the hydro project in September 2012 (see Attachment E). This Final Decision
provides Early Entry Authorization (EEA) starting in 2013. The city can build the project under the
EEA, and will receive the non-revocable easement upon completion of post-construction as-built
survey. The terms of a road use agreement were agreed by the City and USFS Sitka Ranger District
in May 2012. The US Forest Service is currently finalizing the form and language of the agreement.
This agreement is expected to be finalized by December 2012 (see discussion in USFS support
letter, Attachment B).
4.3.3 Permits
Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address
outstanding permit issues.
List of applicable permits
Anticipated permitting timeline
Identify and discussion of potential barriers
Permits required for this project are listed below, along with permit issuance date or the current status
of the permit application.
- FERC Finding of Non-Jurisdiction (issued May 26, 2010)
- ADFG Fish Habitat Permit (issued December 15, 2011)
- ADNR Water Rights (Water Use Permit issued August 7, 2012)
- ADNR Easements (Final Decision issued September 11, 2012)
- US COE (applied August 2010. Permit issuance is pending resolution of SHPO and USFWS
comments. A new cultural resources survey is scheduled for October 2012 to address SHPO
comments. Final design drawings addressing USFWS comments regarding intake operations and in-
stream flows will be issued in October 2012. If no significant cultural resources or operational
concerns are identified, permit issuance is expected by December 2012). Available information and
site reviews to date have not identified any cultural resources in the project footprint that are likely to
be a barrier to the project or permit issuance.
- US Forest Service Road Use Permit (Drafted May 2012, final expected December 2012). The USFS
supports this project, as indicated in the attached support letter (Attachment B) and comments issued
during the public notice periods for the water rights and state land easement. Additionally, the USFS
completed significant upgrades to Indian River Road during the summer of 2012, providing a reliable,
long-term access route from tidewater to the hydro project site.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 11 of 21 7/3//2012
4.3.4 Environmental
Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be
addressed:
Threatened or Endangered species
Habitat issues
Wetlands and other protected areas
Archaeological and historical resources
Land development constraints
Telecommunications interference
Aviation considerations
Visual, aesthetics impacts
Identify and discuss other potential barriers
The following assessment is based on currently available information.
Threatened or endangered species: None.
Habitat issues: Fish habitat issues have been reviewed by ADFG. In-stream flow reservations in the
ADFG Fish Habitat Permit (FH-11-I-0125) may be modified in the future to better serve habitat
needs. Modified in-stream flows under discussion would improve project performance relative to
existing permit terms. All capacity factors, fuel displacements, and project performance metrics in this
application are based on the terms of the existing permit.
Wetlands and other protected areas: The project will fill some wetlands (in-stream diversion footprint,
access roads, etc.). These are being addressed in the permit process.
Archeological resources: A cultural resources survey will be conducted in October 2012 to meet
SHPO requirements for the project.
Land development constraints: None.
Telecommunications Interference: None.
Aviation considerations: None.
Visual, aesthetics impacts: None. The project will not be visible from available vantage points
around Tenakee Springs.
Other potential barriers: None known.
4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues
(Total Estimated Costs and Projected Revenues)
The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any
previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of
their cost data. For example: Applicants records or analysis, industry standards, consultant or
manufacturer’s estimates.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 12 of 21 7/3//2012
4.4.1 Project Development Cost
Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the
project. Cost information should include the following:
Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase
Requested grant funding
Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind
Identification of other funding sources
Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system
Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system
The total anticipated project cost is $3,674,000, including all phases of development through
construction. The total anticipated cost for this phase (construction) is $3,320,000. Grant funds of
$2,988,000 are requested, and will be matched with $332,000 in the form of in-kind services,
equipment usage, loans and/or matching grants (Tenakee does not have any matching grant funds for
this project at this time). Of the $332,000 in matching funds, the City of Tenakee Springs will
contribute a cash match of at least $1,000 and in-kind services of at least $20,000.
The total anticipated capital cost of the project is $3,320,000, and the total development cost is
$3,674,000.
4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs
Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the
applicant.
(Note: Operational costs are not eligible for grant funds however grantees are required to meet
ongoing reporting requirements for the purpose of reporting impacts of projects on the communities
they serve.)
Total annual O&M costs for the project are projected at $0.02 per kWh of energy sold, or $7,465 per
year.
4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale
The power purchase/sale information should include the following:
Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s)
Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range
Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project
The city electric utility will own the project. Power will be sold to utility customers.
With the requested grant, electric rates in the community would decrease from the existing rates of
$0.55 to 0.65 per kWh to about $0.20 to 30 per kWh. This reduced rate would cover all utility
expenses, such as operation, maintenance, repair, general, and administrative costs. These projected
rates do not consider PCE subsidies to residential / community accounts.
The city and electric utility are non-profit operations, so a rate of return is not applicable.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 13 of 21 7/3//2012
4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet
Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in
evaluating the project.
Renewable Energy Source Indian River Hydroelectric Project
The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a
sustainable basis.
Annual average resource availability. capacity factor of 76.2%
(based on hydrology records for Indian River and
adjacent comparable basins)
Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel)
Existing Energy Generation and Usage
a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt1 grid, leave this section blank)
i. Number of generators/boilers/other Three diesel gen sets
ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 1- 88 kW John Deere / Marathon
1- 88 kW John Deere / Marathon
1- 64 kW John Deere / Marathon
iii. Generator/boilers/other type --
iv. Age of generators/boilers/other All were commissioned in 2006. ~7 years old.
v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other 12.7 to 13.2 kWh/gallon, based on 2007 – 2009 data.
b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Annual O&M cost for labor $20,000 (estimated)
ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor $5,000 (estimated)
c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the
Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Electricity [kWh] 433,000 kWh
ii. Fuel usage
Diesel [gal] 34,900 gallons
Other NA
iii. Peak Load Approximately 120 kW
iv. Average Load Approximately 50 kW
v. Minimum Load Approximately 19 kW
vi. Efficiency 12.7 to 13.2 kWh per gallon (2007 - 2009 data)
vii. Future trends Future load trend without hydro is flat or slightly declining. Future load trend
with hydro is expected to increase.
d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable)
i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] 60,000 gallons (estimate)
ii. Electricity [kWh] Unknown
1 The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden Valley Electric
Association, the City of Seward Electric Department, Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage Municipal Light and Power.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 14 of 21 7/3//2012
(any usage is included in power plant data at c.i)
iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] -0-
iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] -0-
v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] 24 cords per year (estimate)
vi. Other Unknown.
Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage
(Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels)
a) Proposed renewable capacity
(Wind, Hydro, Biomass, other)
[kW or MMBtu/hr]
180 kW installed capacity – run of river hydro
76.2% capacity factor.
b) Proposed annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable)
i. Electricity [kWh] Approximately 1,169,000 kWh annually
ii. Heat [MMBtu] --
c) Proposed annual fuel usage (fill in as applicable)
i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] --
ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu] --
iii. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] --
iv. Other --
Project Cost
a) Total capital cost of new system $3,320,000
b) Development cost $3,674,000 (total of preconstruction and
construction)
c) Annual O&M cost of new system $7,465
d) Annual fuel cost $0
Project Benefits
a) Amount of fuel displaced for
i. Electricity ~31,400 gallons (at current load levels)
ii. Heat ~6,500+ gallons
iii. Transportation --
b) Current price of displaced fuel $4.50 per gallon
c) Other economic benefits --
d) Alaska public benefits $170,550 annually in avoided utility fuel cost (actual 2012
Tenakee prices), 37,900 fewer gallons of fuel products being
shipped by barge through the waters of Southeast Alaska.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 15 of 21 7/3//2012
Power Purchase/Sales Price
a) Price for power purchase/sale $0.20 to 0.30 depending on final project costs and
financing methods.
Project Analysis
a) Basic Economic Analysis
Project benefit/cost ratio $5.09 million / 3.18 million = 1.60
Payback (years) $3.18 million / $195,950 = simple payback 16.2 years at projected
2015 fuel prices (AEA/ISER model)
4.4.5 Proposed Biomass System Information
Please address the following items, if know. (For Biomass Projects Only)
SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT
Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings,
and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project.
The benefits information should include the following:
Potential annual fuel displacement (gallons and dollars) over the lifetime of the evaluated
renewable energy project
Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price,
RCA tariff, or cost based rate)
Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits)
Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable
energy subsidies or programs that might be available)
Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project
Annual fuel displacement / Lifetime (50-year) fuel displacement:
- 31,400 gallons for electrical generation (1,570,000 gallons over life)
- 6,500+ gallons for space/water heating (325,000+ gallons over life)
Annual Revenue/Savings (using $4.99 per gallon power plant fuel cost and $6.04 per gallon
heating fuel cost in 2015, per mid range EIA fuel projections developed by AEA/ISER.
- $156,686 avoided fuel (electricity, 2015)
- $39,260 avoided fuel (heating, 2015)
Non-economic benefits of the project to Alaskans include:
- reduced air pollution and noise pollution within Tenakee Springs – improves quality of life and
health of residents, and makes Tenakee a more desirable place to live.
- reduced haulage and handling of petroleum products through the waters of Southeast Alaska by
37,900 gallons annually. Reduced potential for spills and environmental contamination.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 16 of 21 7/3//2012
- Stable and reasonable energy costs will also make Tenakee a more desirable place to live, and
will help to attract local economic activity such as tourism, fishing, etc. The hydro combined
with the hot springs will bolster the sustainability of the community for the long term.
Commercial enterprises in Tenakee in particular will benefit from lower energy costs. Lower
energy costs will make local businesses such as stores, restaurants, and lodges more viable and
competitive and will increase Tenakee's sustainability and long term viability as a community.
Tenakee has struggled in recent years to attract and retain working families with children to keep
the local school open. Affordable energy, and the local economic activity it will encourage and
support, will help considerably in our long term efforts to help the community thrive.
Green Tags on the voluntary market have stabilized at a price of approximately $0.001 per kWh,
which would result in incremental revenue of $1,100 to 1,200 per year assuming that all Green
Tags from the project full output were sold.
SECTION 6– SUSTAINABILITY
Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable.
Include at a minimum:
Proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered.
How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project
Identification of operational issues that could arise.
A description of operational costs including on-going support for any back-up or existing
systems that may be require to continue operation
Commitment to reporting the savings and benefits
The city electric utility will be responsible for operation and maintenance of the hydro project
once it is completed. O&M costs would be covered by the utility’s electric rates and revenues.
O&M costs are estimated at $0.02 per kWh.
Operational costs will include periodic cleaning of the diversion and intake structure (clearing logs
and debris), scheduled maintenance and overhauls of the turbines, generators, and ancillary
equipment and related hydro project operations such as seasonal adjustment of settings at the
intake to allow for winter vs. summer operations.
The City of Tenakee Springs commits to reporting the savings and benefits associated with the
Indian River hydroelectric project.
SECTION 7 – READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS
Discuss what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed
with work once your grant is approved.
Tell us what you may have already accomplished on the project to date and identify other grants
that may have been previously awarded for this project and the degree you have been able to
meet the requirements of previous grants.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 17 of 21 7/3//2012
The City of Tenakee Springs has been actively advancing this project through the study,
permitting and design process since 2009. This has included the successful completion of one
prior hydro study grant and the successful management to date of a second grant for final design
and permitting, The project is on track to be ready for limited construction in the summer of 2013
(access roads), potentially using construction crews that will already be in the area for other
projects. The city would procure long lead items later in 2013 in time for full construction of the
project in the summer of 2014.
SECTION 8– LOCAL SUPORT
Discuss what local support or possible opposition there may be regarding your project. Include
letters of support from the community that would benefit from this project.
Attached to this application are letters of support from the US Forest Service, Chatham School
District, and several private individuals who support the project.
The city is not aware of any opposition to this project. None of the permits issued to date have
received opposing comments during public comment periods.
SECTION 9 – GRANT BUDGET
Tell us how much you want in grant funds Include any investments to date and funding sources,
how much is being requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an
applicant.
The City of Tenakee Springs is requesting a grant of $2,988,000 to construct the Indian River
Hydroelectric Project. Since 2009, the Denali Commission, State of Alaska, and City of Tenakee
Springs have committed $354,000 to ready this project for construction. This amount includes
$51,000 in matching funds and in-kind contributions from the City of Tenakee Springs, plus
significant additional in-kind contributions from numerous residents of Tenakee Springs. The
City Council has passed several unanimous resolutions supporting this project over the past
several years.
The city proposes to invest an additional $332,000 in the form of cash match, loans, and/or in-
kind services to complete this project. Some (but not all) of this matching amount may come
from other grants, however the city does not have any other grants in place as matching funds for
this project at this time.
The city will make the use of its equipment available for the project, which is valued at $20,000.
The city will provide a cash match of at least $1,000. The city plans to pursue a State of Alaska
grant for the balance of matching funds for the project ($319,000). If unsuccessful, it will
provide the matching funds from city assets or by a loan, bond, or other debt vehicle carried by
the city or utility.
Applications should include a separate worksheet for each project phase that was identified in section
2.3.2 of this application, (Reconnaissance, Feasibility, Conceptual Design, Design and Permitting, and
Construction). Please use the tables provided below to detail your proposed project’s budget. Be sure to
use one table for each phase of your project.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 18 of 21 7/3//2012
Milestone or Task
Anticipated
Completion Date
*
RE- Fund
Grant
Funds
Grantee
Matching
Funds
Source of
Matching
Funds:
Cash/In-
kind/Federal
Grants/Other
State
Grants/Other
TOTALS
Grant Agreement with AEA Signed: July 2013
1. Confirmation that all
Design / Feasibility
Requirements are Complete
Jul. 2013 $5,000 $0 $5,000
2. Completion of
Construction Documents
Jul 2013 (task 4),
Feb. 2014 (task 5) $9,500 $500 Cash $10,000
3. Contractor(s) / Vendor(s)
Selection and Award
Jul 2013 (task 4)
April 2014 (task 5) $24,500 $500 Cash $25,000
4. Construction – Year 1
(access roads **) Oct. 2013 $580,000 $10,000 In-kind $590,000
5. Construction – Year 2
(balance of project)
5a. Transmission Line Oct. 2014 $299,000 $10,000 In-kind $309,000
5b. Diversion/Intake
Structure Oct. 2014 $209,000 $77,000 Cash or
other grant $286,000
5c. Penstock Oct. 2014 $838,000 $78,000 Cash or
other grant $916,000
5d. Powerhouse Oct. 2014 $613,000 $78,000 Cash or
other grant $691,000
5e. Generation Equipment Oct. 2014 $315,000 $78,000 Cash or
other grant $393,000
6. Integration and Testing Nov. 2014 $50,000 $0 $50,000
7. Final Acceptance,
Commissioning, and Startup Dec. 2014 $45,000 $0 $45,000
8. Operations Reporting 2015 $0 $0 In-kind $0
TOTALS $2,988,000 $332,000 $3,320,000
Budget Categories:
Direct Labor & Benefits $80,000 $20,000 $100,000
Travel & Per Diem $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
Equipment $250,000 $19,000 $269,000
Materials & Supplies $1,052,000 $19,000 $1,071,000
Contractual Services $240,000 $19,000 $259,000
Construction Services $1,361,000 $250,000 $1,611,000
Other
TOTALS $2,988,000 $332,000 $3,320,000
* Construction schedule is seasonally sensitive - delays in grant authorization may adversely impact
schedule.
** Assumes qualified contractors will be in area during 2013 and work schedules will allow for
construction of project access roads / trails.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 6
Grant Application
AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 19 of 21 7/3//2012
Project Milestones that should be addressed in Budget Proposal
Reconnaissance Feasibility Design and
Permitting Construction
1. Project scoping and
contractor solicitation.
2. Resource
identification and
analysis
3. Land use, permitting,
and environmental
analysis
4. Preliminary design
analysis and cost
5. Cost of energy and
market analysis
6. Simple economic
analysis
7. Final report and
recommendations
1. Project scoping
and contractor
solicitation.
2. Detailed energy
resource analysis
3. Identification of
land and regulatory
issues,
4. Permitting and
environmental
analysis
5. Detailed analysis of
existing and future
energy costs and
markets
6. Assessment of
alternatives
7. Conceptual design
analysis and cost
estimate
8. Detailed economic
and financial
analysis
9, Conceptual
business and
operations plans
10. Final report and
recommendations
1. Project scoping
and contractor
solicitation for
planning and
design
2. Permit
applications (as
needed)
3. Final
environmental
assessment and
mitigation plans
(as needed)
4. Resolution of
land use, right of
way issues
5. Permit approvals
6. Final system
design
7. Engineers cost
estimate
8. Updated
economic and
financial analysis
9. Negotiated
power sales
agreements with
approved rates
10. Final business
and operational
plan
1. Confirmation that all
design and feasibility
requirements are
complete.
2. Completion of bid
documents
3. Contractor/vendor
selection and award
4. Construction Phases
–
Each project will have
unique construction
phases, limitations,
and schedule
constraints which
should be identified
by the grantee
5. Integration and
testing
6. Decommissioning old
systems
7. Final Acceptance,
Commissioning and
Start-up
8. Operations Reporting
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS
ATTACHMENT B
LETTERS OF SUPPORT
United StatesUSDADepartmentof:z-:z=;_..Agriculture
Forest
Service
Alaska Region
Tongass National Forest
Sitka Ranger District
204 Siginaka Way
Sitka,AK 99835
Phone:(907)747-6671
Fax:(907)747-4253
File Code:2170
Date:September I],2012
Shawn Calfa
Grant Manager
Alaska Energy Authority
8]3 West Northern Lights Blvd.
Anchorage,AK 99503
I am writing this letter in support of the City of Tenakee Springs'Indian River Hydroelectric Project grant
proposal for Round 6 of the Renewable Energy Grant Program.This project is an excellent example of
responsible,sustainable use of our local resources.Once complete,this project will supply about 90%of
Tenakee Springs'current electrical demands and displace about 44,400 gallons of diesel fuel per year.
Diesel fuel generated electricity contributes significant amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as
well as creating significant noise.Recent increases in the price of diesel fuel have resulted in 3]7%
increased cost of fuel from 2002 to 2009.
This project will help to stabilize and lower electric rates in Tenakee Springs.Those changes would
lower the cost of living in the community and make local businesses more viable.Other potential benefits
are diversifying the local economy,stabilizing or increasing the population of school-age children,and
providing a stepping stone toward potential jobs in construction,maintenance,and operation of
hydroelectric generation.This will in turn increase the long-term viability of the community.
The Tongass National Forest is a committed partner to Tenakee Springs'development of sustainable,
affordable,and renewable power generation.We are working closely with the City to ensure long-term
access to the project site through changes in our motor vehicle use planning and reciprocal rights-of-way.
The City concurrently is working with the Tongass National Forest to develop project design and
operations compatible with the Forest Services'significant investments in enhancing the salmon
productivity of Indian River.
If you have any questions please fee free to contact me at (907)747-4218 or by email at
cgoularte@fsJed.us.
Sincerely,
CAROL A.GOULARTE
District Ranger
~
Printed on Recycled Paper ••,
1
‐‐ SCHOOLS ‐‐
ANGOON GUSTAVUS KLUKWAN TENAKEE
Chatham
School
District
Scott Butterfield, Ph.D.
DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT
P.O. BOX 109 ANGOON, ALASKA 99820 PHONE: 788-3302 or 788-3682 FAX: 788-3252
Chatham School District
Mission Statement
In partnership with families and communities, the Chatham School District will provide safe and stable educational
experiences built upon the uniqueness of each community, to educate students to become self‐sufficient adults who will be
contributing members of our diverse and changing world. Revised: 8‐7‐2008
September 20, 2012
Mr. Art Bloom
Vice Mayor, Hydro Project Manager
PO Box 52
City of Tenakee Springs
Tenakee Springs, Alaska 99841
Subject: Statement of Support for Indian River Hydroelectric Project
Dear Mr. Bloom:
I am writing in support of Tenakee Springs’ efforts to secure funding for the Indian River hydro
project. This project is a excellent example of responsible, sustainable use of our local resources.
Once complete, this project will supply 80 to 90% of Tenakee’s annual electricity needs, displacing
approximately 31,400 gallons of fuel used annually for electricity generation.
In addition to reducing the amount of fuel burned in Tenakee and reducing the amount of noise
from the diesel power plant, this project will help stabilize and lower electric rates in Tenakee
Springs, lowering the cost of living in the community and making local businesses more viable.
This in turn will help make Tenakee a more stable, sustainable community.
Sincerely,
Scott Butterfield, Superintendent
Chatham School District
Board of Education
MR. LARRY SWEET, SR.-PRES.
MR. KEVIN FRANK, SR., CLERK
MR. ALBERT KOOKESH III
MRS. SALLY McLAUGHLIN
MRS. LYNETTE HART
October 10, 2012
Mr. Art Bloom
Vice Mayor, Hydro Project Manager
PO Box 52
City of Tenakee Springs
Tenakee Springs, Alaska 99841
RE: Tenakee Springs Indian River Hydroelectric Project
Dear Mr. Bloom:
We are writing to support Tenakee Springs’ efforts to secure funding for the Indian River hydro
project. This project is an excellent example of responsible, sustainable use of our local
resources. Once complete, this project will supply 80 to 90% of Tenakee Spring’s annual
electricity needs, displacing approximately 31,400 gallons of fuel used annually for electricity
generation.
In addition to reducing the amount of fuel burned in Tenakee and reducing the amount of noise
from the diesel power plant, this project will help stabilize and lower electric rates in Tenakee
Springs, lowering the cost of living in the community and making local businesses more viable.
This in turn will help make Tenakee a more stable, sustainable community.
Please let us know how we can help to further support this important Tenakee Springs and
Southeast Alaska project?
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Wilson
P.O. Box 51
Tenakee Springs, AK 99841
Joel Groves
From:"Peter Bernstein" <boatsnpete@gmail.com>
Date:Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:49 AM
To:"City of Tenakee Springs Alaska" <citytke@gmail.com>
Cc:<joel@polarconsult.net>
Subject:Indian River Hydro Project
Page 1 of 1
9/21/2012
I am writing in support of this project and in support of Art Bloom who has worked many hours
in persistent pursuit of it. Implementing this project will substantially reduce Tenakee's carbon
footprint, lower and stabilize power costs and will go a long way to making Tenakee a more
economically viable place to live and do business.This will also extend the useful life of our
existing power plant far into the future. in short, there are no foreseeable downsides to this
project and many benefits to be gained.
Pete Bernstein
204 W. Tenakee ave
(box 501)
Tenakee Springs, Ak. 99841
Joel Groves
From:"Larry Hura" <huracarp@hotmail.com>
Date:Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:40 PM
To:"City of Tenakee Springs Alaska" <citytke@gmail.com>; <joel@polarconsult.net>
Subject:Tenakee hydro project
Page 1 of 1
9/21/2012
To: Art Bloom, Tenakee project manager
Thank you for your time and effort in securing hydro power for the City of Tenakee Springs. This project has
been in the making for many years, and now, it looks as though it may become a reality. It is time for Tenakee,
and other small communities, to stop using fossil fuels when there are much cleaner means to gener
ate electricity.
Stabilizing the price of electricty is very important to any small community and its residents, especially small
business. This hydro project will be a giant step in achieving that goal.
Again, thank you Mr. Bloom for your hard work, and you can count on me for my continuing support in
making the hydro project a reality in Tenakee Springs.
Larry
Hura
Councilman, Tenakee Springs
ATTACHMENT C
ELECTRONIC VERSION OF ENTIRE APPLICATION
ATTACHMENT D
GOVERNING BODY RESOLUTION
City of Tenakee Springs
RESOLUTION 2013-03
In the Council
Introduced by
August 30, 2012
Art Bloom
A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF TENAKEE SPRINGS, ALASKA,
AUTHORIZING AN AEA GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the City of Tenakee Springs desires assistance in funding the study,
design, development, and construction of a hydroelectric project on Indian
River; and
WHEREAS, the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) is accepting grant applications for the
fiscal year 2014 funding round of the Renewable Energy Grant Program,
due on September 24, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the City qualifies to receive funding from the Grant Program;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Tenakee
Springs, Alaska, to agree and affirm the following:
1. The Council commits to providing the matching resources for the
project as specified in the grant application, and
2. The Council hereby authorized Arthur Bloom to sign the grant
application, and to commit the City to the obligations under the grant,
3. The Council designated Arthur Bloom as the point of contact to
represent the City for purposes of the grant application,
4. The Council certifies that the City is in compliance with federal, state,
and local laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations.
ADOPTED 7 ayes, 0 nays THIS 30th DAY OF August 2012
_________________
Don Pegues
City Council President
Ex officio MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
Lisa Speno
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT E
ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT PERMITS
- FERC FINDING OF NON-JURISDICTION (MAY 26, 2010)
- ADFG FISH HABITAT PERMIT (DECEMBER 15, 2011)
- ADNR WATER RIGHTS (AUGUST 7, 2012)
- ADNR EASEMENT FINAL DECISION (SEPTEMBER 11, 2012)
- DEPT. OF ARMY WETLANDS/ WATER PERMIT (PENDING)
- U.S. FOREST SERVICE ACCESS AGREEMENT (PENDING)
FERC FINDING OF NON-JURISDICTION
(MAY 26, 2010)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC ¶62,179
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
City of Tenakee Springs Docket No.DI10-8-000
ORDER RULING ON DECLARATION OF INTENTION
AND FINDING LICENSING NOT REQUIRED
(Issued May 26,2010)
1.On March 1,2010,the City of Tenakee Springs filed a Declaration of Intention
(DI)concerning the proposed Indian River Hydroelectric Project,which will be located
near the city of Tenakee Springs,on Chichagof Island,Sitka Borough,Alaska,affecting
T.47 S,R.63 E,secs.15,21,and 22,Copper River Meridian.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.The proposed run-of-river Indian River Hydroelectric Project will consist of:(1)
a 6-foot-high,30-foot-wide diversion structure,to be located at river mile (RM)0.85;
(2)a 40-inch-diameter,1,550-foot-long penstock;(3)a 30-foot-wide,40-foot-long,
wood frame powerhouse,located at RM 0.55,housing a 250 kW turbine-synchronous
generator;(4)a 50-foot-long tailrace returning flows back into Indian River;(5)a
5,900-foot-long transmission line;and (6)appurtenant facilities.
PUBLIC NOTICE
3.Notice of the DI was issued on March 9,2010.Protests,comments,and motions
to intervene were to be filed by April 9,2010.The U.S.Department of Agriculture,
U.S.Forest Service,Tongass National Forest,filed a motion to intervene and comments
on April 19,2010.The comments stated that the proposed project had the potential to
affect Forest Service interests,but the comments did not relate to the issue of
jurisdiction.No other protests,comments,or motions to intervene have been received.
JURISDICTION
4.Pursuant to Section 23(b)(1)of the Federal Power Act (FPA),16 U.S.C.§817(1),
a non-federal hydroelectric project must (unless it has a still-valid pre-1920 federal
permit)be licensed if it:
20100526-3076 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 05/26/2010
Docket No.DI10-8-000 2
•is located on a navigable water of the United States;
•occupies lands or reservations of the United States;
•utilizes surplus water or waterpower from a government dam;or
•is located on a stream over which Congress has Commerce Clause jurisdiction,is
constructed or modified on or after August 26,1935,and affects the interests of
interstate or foreign commerce.
DISCUSSION
5.The proposed project will not occupy an y public lands or reservations of the
United States and will not use surplus water or waterpower from a Federal government
dam.The proposed project would be constructed after August 26,1935,and would be
located on a Commerce Clause stream.1 However,the proposed project would not
affect the interests of interstate commerce,because the City of Tenakee Springs plans to
sell the generated power to the Tenakee Springs Electric Utility,which is not connected
to an interstate transmission grid.Therefore,the project does not require licensing
under Section 23(b)(1)of the FPA.
CONCLUSION
6.Consequently,Section 23(b)(1)of the FPA does not require licensing of the
proposed project.If evidence to support the Commission’s licensing jurisdiction is
found in the future,Section 23(b)(1)would require licensing.Under Section 4(g)of the
FPA,the project owner could then be required to apply for a license.
The Director orders:
(A)Section 23(b)(1)of the Federal Power Act does not require licensing of the
proposed Indian River Hydroelectric Project.This order is issued without prejudice to
any future determination upon new or additional evidence that licensing is required.
1 The Indian River flows into Tenakee Inlet and Chatham Straits,tributary to the
Pacific Ocean.
20100526-3076 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 05/26/2010
Docket No.DI10-8-000 3
(B)This order constitutes final agency action.Requests for rehearing by the
Commission ma y be filed within 30 da ys of the date of issuance of this order,pursuant
to 18 C.F.R.§385.713.
William Guey-Lee,Chief
Engineering and Jurisdiction Branch
Division of Hydropower
Administration and Compliance
20100526-3076 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 05/26/2010
ADFG FISH HABITAT PERMIT
(DECEMBER 15, 2011)
ADNR WATER USE PERMIT (WATER RIGHTS)
(AUGUST 7, 2012)
Page 1 of 3
Department of Natural Resources
Division of Mining, Land, and Water
PERMIT TO APPROPRIATE WATER
LAS 27836
The State of Alaska, acting by and through the Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Mining, Land and Water, PO Box 111020, 400 Willoughby Avenue, Suite
400, Juneau, Alaska 99811-1020, hereinafter referred to as the grantor, under AS
46.15, the Alaska Water Use Act, and the regulations adopted under it, grants to:
City of Tenakee Springs
P.O. Box 52
Tenakee Springs, Alaska 99841
The right to develop the following use of water:
SOURCE: Indian River
QUANTITY: 50 Cubic Feet per Second
USE: Hydroelectric Power Generation
PERIOD: January 1 through December 31
With a PRIORITY DATE of September 7, 2010
The location of this water source:
A diversion weir on Indian River, which flows into Tenakee Inlet, approximately 1
mile northeast of Tenakee Springs on Chichagof lsland, in the SE1/4 SW1/4 of
Section 15, Township 47 South, Range 63 East, Copper River Meridian,
The location to which this appropriation is appurtenant:
A hydroelectric powerhouse located approximately 1,800 feet downstream of the
diversion weir and adjacent to the Indian River within State of Alaska easement
ADL 108047, in the NE1/4 NW1/4 of Section 22, Township 47 South, Range 63
East, Copper River Meridian, located within the Sitka Recording District, First
Judicial District, State of Alaska.
Changes in the natural state of water are to be made in the manner and only for the
purposes stated in this permit. This permit is subject to the pertinent statutory
PERMIT TO APPROPRIATE WATER
LAS 27836
Page 2 of 3
provisions in AS 46.15, Administrative Regulations in 11 AAC 93, and the following
conditions:
The holder of this permit shall comply with the following:
1. Follow acceptable engineering standards in exercising the right granted by
this permit.
2. Except for claims or losses arising from negligence of the State, defend
and indemnify the State against and hold it harmless from any and all
claims, demands, legal actions, loss, liability and expense for injury to or
death of persons and damages to or loss of property arising out of or
connected with the exercise of the right granted by this permit.
3. Comply with all applicable laws, regulations and conditions.
4. Notify the grantor of any change of address, transfer of any real property
identified in this permit, or any proposed change in the water
appropriation.
5. Respond to any request for additional information during the duration of
this permit per AS 46.15.100 and AS 46.15.175. Failure to respond may
result in the termination of this permit.
6. Obtain and maintain permanent right of access to the property where
water is to be withdrawn, impounded, or diverted, and over which water is
to be transported both to the point of use and to the point of discharge, per
11 AAC 93.040 (c) (4).
7. This permit is subject to ADFG Fish Habitat Permit FH11-I-0125 (Issued
December 15, 2011) as it has been issued and may be amended from
time to time, regarding, but not limited to, minimum in-stream flow
releases, diversion structures, step-heights between fish pass structure
pools, fish screen, rates of decrease in water levels, monitoring,
recording, and reporting, etc.
ADFG Fish Habitat Permit FH11-I-0125 is hereby attached as Appendix A,
and compliance therewith, or any amendment thereof, is a condition of this
State water permit (LAS 27836).
Per the above referenced ADFG Fish Habitat Permit, or as it may be
amended from time to time, the fish pass structure will be provided with a
ADNR EASEMENT FINAL DECISION
(SEPTEMBER 11, 2012)
ADNR EASEMENT PRELIMINARY DECISION
(JULY 19, 2012)