Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEHE-#211269-v1-Noorvik_AEA_Round_6_Final_ApplicationCity of Noorvik Image from Alaska Division of Community & Regional Affairs, AK Community Database Information Summaries Application for Renewable Energy Fund Grant Alaska Energy Authority Round VI Noorvik Heat Recovery for the Water Treatment Plant September 2012 AEA Application Contents • Application • Authorized Signers & Resolution • Letters of Support • Resumes • Supplemental Documents Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 •� door-) Grant Application i dOW--', ENERGY AUTHOMY Application Forms and Instructions This instruction page and the following grant application constitutes the Grant Application Form for Round 6 of the Renewable Energy Fund. An electronic version of the Request for Applications (RFA) and this form are available online at: http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE Fund-6.html • If you need technical assistance filling out this application, please contact Shawn Calfa, the Alaska Energy Authority Grant Administrator at (907) 771-3031 or at scalfa(daidea.oM. • If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application forms for each project. • Multiple phases for the same project may be submitted as one application. • If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide milestones and grant budget for each phase of the project. • In order to ensure that grants provide sufficient benefit to the public, AEA may limit recommendations for grants to preliminary development phases in accordance with 3 ACC 107.605(1). • If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. • If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed. REMINDER: • Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act AS 40.25, and materials submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no statutory exemptions apply. • All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final recommendations are made to the legislature. • In accordance with 3 AAC 107.630 (b) Applicants may request trade secrets or proprietary company data be kept confidential subject to review and approval by the Authority. If you want information is to be kept confidential the applicant must: o Request the information be kept confidential. o Clearly identify the information that is the trade secret or proprietary in their application. o Receive concurrence from the Authority that the information will be kept confidential. If the Authority determines it is not confidential it will be treated as a public record in accordance with AS 40.25 or returned to the applicant upon request. AEA 13-006 Application Page 1 of 20 7/3/2011 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 • Grant Application 41111111111K)ENERGY AUTHOR Y [FSECTION 1 -APPLICANT INFORMATION Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal) f City of Noorvik Type of Entity: Governmental Firm - City of Noorvik Fiscal Year End 2013 Tax ID # 92-0047923 Tax Status: For -profit or x non-profit ( check one) ` _ Mailing Address Physical Address P.O. Box 182 20 Fireweed Drive Noorvik, Alaska 99763 Noorvik, Alaska 99673 Telephone Fax Email 907 636-2100 907 636-2135 cityofnoorvik@gmail.com 1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT / GRANTS MANAGER Name Title Carl Remley Manager, Energy Projects, ANTHC,DEHE Mailing Address 3900 Ambassador Drive Suite 301, Anchorage AK 99508 Telephone Fax Email 907-729-3543 907-729-4048 cremley@anthc.org 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your application, will be rejected. 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or X A local government, or A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities); Yes 1.2.2 Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant's governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box ) Yes 1.2.3 As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant agreement. Yes 1.2.4 If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the application.) Yes 1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant funds for the benefit of the general public. If no please describe the nature of the project and who will be the primary beneficiaries. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 2 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 LANNU .IIE) _ Grant Application =0111DENERGY AUTHORrfY SECTION 2 — PROJECT SUMMARY This is intended to be no more than a 1-2 page overview of your project. 2.1 Project Title — (Provide a 4 to 5 word title for your project) Heat Recovery for the Water Treatment Plant 2.2 Project Location — Include the physical location of your project and name(s) of the community or communities that will benefit from your project in the subsections below. _J Noorvik, AK. The existing power plant and water treatment plant. 2.2.1 Location of Project — Latitude and longitude, street address, or community name. Latitude and longitude coordinates may be obtained from Google Maps by finding you project's location on the map and then right clicking with the mouse and selecting "What is here? The coordinates will be displayed in the Google search window above the map in a format as follows: 61.195676.-149.898663. If you would like assistance obtaining this information please contact AEA at 907-771-3031. Noorvik 66.839487,-161.032963 2.2.2 Community benefiting — Name(s) of the community or communities that will be the beneficiaries of the project. Noorvik, AK 2.3 PROJECT TYPE Put X in boxes as appropriate 2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type Wind Biomass or Biofuels Hydro, including run of river Transmission of Renewable Energy Geothermal, including Heat Pumps Small Natural Gas X Heat Recovery from existing sources Hydrokinetic Solar Storage of Renewable Other (Describe) 2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply) Pre -Construction Construction Reconnaissance X Design and Permitting Feasibility X Construction and Commissioning Conceptual Design 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief, one -paragraph description of your proposed project. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 3 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 6 MEM' ENERGY AUTHORITY This project will provide waste heat from the existing electrical power plant to the water treatment plant. The estimated fuel oil savings to the community water plant is projected to be 18,600 gallons of heating oil per year. For more detailed information, see the attached Noorvik, Alaska 2012 Heat Recovery Feasibility Study. 2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT Briefly discuss the financial and public benefits that will result from this project, (such as reduced fuel costs, lower energy costs, etc.) The water treatment plant benefits all the residents of Noorvik, AK; however, the cost of energy to operate the facility threatens its sustainability. This project is expected to reduce the fuel oil usage of the facility by 18,600 gallons per year, nearly offsetting the total fuel oil usage. 2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source of other contributions to the project. Based on the attached 2012 Heat Recovery Feasibility Study, the cost to deploy this project is estimated to be $985,805 (2014 dollars). As allocated in the budget sheets of Section 9, $74,592 is required for design work and $911,213 is needed for the construction In addition, the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) will provide an in -kind cost match of 3% or $29,580 in the form of project and program management services. 2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY ^ Include a summary of grant request and your project's total costs and. benefits below. Grant Costs (Summary of funds requested) 2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $ 985,805 2.7.2 Cash match to be provided $ 0 2.7.3 In -kind match to be provided $ 29,580 2.7.4 Other grant applications not yet approved $ 0 2.7.5 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 through 2.7.3) $ 1,015,580 ti Project Costs & Benefits (Summary of total project costs including work to date and future cost estimates to get to a fully operational project) 2.7.6 Total Project Cost (Summary from Cost Worksheet $ 985,808 including estimates through construction) 2.7.7 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $ 85,188 2.7.8 Other Public Benefit (If you can calculate the benefit in $ terms of dollars please provide that number here and explain how you calculated that number in your application (Section 5.) AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 4 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application _ SECTION 3 — PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN sow AIA&K-Awah.. MEND ENERGY AUTHCRFY Describe who will be responsible for managing the project.and provide a plan for successfully completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application. 3.1 Project Manager Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include contact information, a resume and references for the manager(s). if the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management support. If the applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section. ANTHC Energy Projects Manager Carl Remley has been an ANTHC employee since 2002. Mr. Remley is responsible for both energy conservation and renewable energy projects. At present, this includes performing energy audits in public buildings in 40 rural Alaska villages, installing energy conservation displays in all homes in 12 villages, evaluating heat recovery opportunities in 10 villages, implementing heat recovery in several villages, and acting as the energy coordinator for the Indian Health Service in Alaska. Prior to that, Mr. Remley owned and operated an energy conservation consulting company for 22 years and was a design engineer in the aerospace industry for 10 years. Mr. Remley has a Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master's Degree in Business Administration. He is also both a Certified Energy Auditor and a Certified Energy Manager. 3.2 Project Schedule and Milestones Please fill out the schedule below. Be sure to identify key tasks and decision points in in your project along with estimated start and end dates for each of the milestones and tasks. Please clearly identify the beginning and ending of all phases of your proposed project. Milestones Tasks Execution of Grant and Agreements _Start Date 7/1/2013 End Date 9/1/2013 Project Planning Conduct Kick-off Meeting 35 °/a design with Cost Estimate 10/1 /2013 10/1 /2013 10/1/_2_013 12/1 /2013 12/1/2013 Final Design Complete 95 % Design with Cost Estimate 3/1/2014 Construction Bid Documents 3/1/2014 4/1/2014 Final Business Plan 3/1/2014 5/1/2014 Negotiated heat sales agreement 12/1/2014 4/1/2014 AEA Approves moving ahead to construction 5/1/2014 5/1/2014 Pre-Const. meeting with Schedule and cost estimate with ANTHC construction department—. 8/1/2014 Construction Phase Start 8/1/2014 Material Procurement and Mobilization 8/1/2014 11/1/2014 On -site Construction 9/1/2014 8/1/2015 Conduct periodic site visits 9/1/2014 8/1/2015 Conduct Substantial Completion Inspection 9/1/2015 9/1/2015 Start-up and Testing Startup and Testing 9/1/2015 9/1/2015 Clear Punch list Items 9/1/2015 10/1/2015 _ Project Closeout 10/1/2015 11/1/2015 AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 5 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 i4MISE-) �GrantApplication ENERGYAUTHORrrY~ 3.3 Project Resources Describe the personnel, contractors, accounting or bookkeeping personnel or firms, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an attachment to your application. The project manager will be Carl Remley of ANTHC. He will be supported during the design phase by Will Fraser, ANTHC Lead Mechanical Engineer, and Dave Reed, ANTHC Lead Electrical Engineer. To the extent possible, local labor will be used during construction. ANTHC will use its purchasing and contracting resources for material procurement and delivery. Resumes of all key personnel are attached to this application. 3.4 Project Communications Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status. Please provide an alternative contact person and their contact information. Written project progress reports will be provided to the AEA project manager as required by the grant. Meetings will be conducted with ANTHC, the Village, and AEA to discuss the status of this project. Regular coordination meetings will be held between AEA and ANTHC regarding all projects. 3.5 Project Risk l Discuss potential problems and how you would address them. In general, there are no technological or financial risks involved with the plan to utilize recovered heat from the power plant to provide heat to the water treatment plant. Installing the necessary heat exchangers, piping, pumps, and controls necessary for implementation has been done many times before and proven effective for many years. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 6 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application 4111111111111E)ENERGYAUTHORRY SECTION 4 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS • The level of information will vary according to phase(s) of the project you propose to undertake with grant funds. • If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. For pre -construction applications, describe the resource to the extent known. For design and permitting or construction projects, please provide feasibility documents, design documents, and permitting documents (if applicable) as attachments to this application. The energy resource available is the heat from the water jackets of the power plant engines. The heat available from the power plant significantly reduces that required by the water treatment plant most of the year, as indicated by the attached 2012 Heat Recovery Feasibility Study. The only realistic alternative to utilizing the recovered heat is to continue to burn over 21,000 gallons of fuel oil to provide the heat required by the water treatment plant. More specifics are contained in the attached 2012 Heat Recovery Feasibility Study. 4.2 Existing Energy System 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information the number, size, aRe, efficiency, and type of generation. about A heat recovery utilization spreadsheet has been developed to estimate the recoverable heat based on monthly total electric power production, engine heat rates, building heating demand, loads, heating degree days, passive losses for power plant heat and piping, and arctic piping losses. The spreadsheet utilizes assumed time -of -day variations for electric power production and heat demand. Power generation data from AVEC for fiscal year 2011 is used in the spreadsheet. The estimated heat rejection rate for the lead power plant genset, a Detroit Diesel Series 60 DDEC4 (with marine jacket installed), is used to estimate available recovered heat. Heating degree-days for Noorvik were utilized for this site. All arctic piping is assumed to be routed above grade. 4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources. The existing water treatment plant building is hydronically heated. An energy audit of the facility performed in 2011 estimated annual fuel consumption of 21,300 gallons/year. The existing power plant was not designed for heat recovery and must be retrofitted. 4.2.3 Existing Energy Market Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy customers. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 7 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 _ MM_. - Grant Application i4MM9___-EN_E_RGYALJTH0RrrY All heating oil must be barged in during the summer months. The impact of this project will be to reduce the overall use of oil by approximately 18,600 gallons per year. While this reduction will not change the price of oil in Noorvik, it will significantly reduce the community's consumption of oil, replacing that consumption with jacket heat from the diesel engines. 4.3 Proposed System Inciude information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues. 4.3.1 System Design Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system: • A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location • Optimum installed capacity • Anticipated capacity factor • Anticipated annual generation Anticipated barriers • Basic integration concept ■ Deliveri methods address The heat recovery system captures jacket water heat generated by the AVEC power plant that is typically rejected to the atmosphere by the radiators. The recovered heat is transferred via above -grade arctic piping to the end users. The objective is to reduce the consumption of expensive heating fuel by utilizing available recovered heat. Although heat recovery is an excellent method of reducing heating fuel costs, recovered heat is a supplementary heat source and it is imperative that the end -user facility heating systems are operational at all times. Hot engine coolant is piped through a plate heat exchanger located at the power plant. Heat is transferred from the engine coolant to the recovered heat loop without mixing the fluids. Controls at the power plant are used to prevent sub -cooling of the generator engines and associated reduction of electric power production efficiency. The recovered heat fluid is pumped through buried insulated pipe to the end -user facilities, and is typically tied into the end -user heating system using a plate heat exchanger. AVEC PLANT TIE-IN A marine jacket will be added to the lead power plant generator. All generator cooling piping will be insulated with a minimum of 1.5-in rubber foam insulation and have an aluminum jacket where exposed to the weather. All valves will be either bronze ball valves or lug style butterfly valves with seals compatible with 50/50 glycol/water mixtures at 200F. Air vents, thermometers, pressure gauges, drain valves, and pressure relief valves will also be provided. Additional controls will be added, including a BTU meter and motorized bypass valve for coolant temperature control. ARCTIC PIPING (Recovered Heat Loop) The proposed arctic piping is based on ANTHC's standard arctic pipe design with a 3-in fiber reinforced polypropylene carrier pipe (Aquatherm Climatherm SDR11), 4-in polyurethane foam insulation, and aluminum outer jacket. The wing will be supported from the ground AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 8 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 •■© Grant Application GM11111111111DENERGY AUTHORfTY surface or helical piers where the ground isn't sufficiently stable. The heat recovery piping will run from the power plant alongside the road to the to the end -user building. Circulation pumps located at the water treatment plant building will circulate heating fluid from the AVEC facility. When the water treatment plant is not actively consuming recovered heat, the system will throttle down heating fluid flow to minimize power consumption. The recovered heat fluid will be a 50/50 Propylene Glycol/Water solution to provide freeze protection to the piping. END -USER BUILDING TIE-INS End -user building tie-ins typically consist of brazed plate heat exchangers with a heat injection pump to prevent back feeding heat to AVEC or other users. Plate heat exchangers located in the end -user mechanical room will be tied into the boiler return piping to preheat the boiler water prior to entering the boiler. The maximum anticipated delivered recovered heat supply temperature is about 190F. When there is insufficient recovered heat to meet the building heating load, the building heating system (boiler or heater) will fire and add heat. Off the shelf controls will lock out the recovered heat system when there is insufficient recovered heat available. Typical indoor piping will be type L copper tube with solder joints. Isolation valves will be solder end bronze ball valves or flanged butterfly valves. All piping will be insulated with a minimum of 1-in insulation with an all -service jacket. Flexibility will be provided where required for thermal expansion and differential movement. Air vents, thermometers, pressure gauges, drain valves, and pressure relief valves will also be provided. The end -user facility will also receive a BTU meter to provide recovered heat use totalization and instantaneous use. 4.3.2 Land Ownership Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues. There are no apparent conflicts with rights -of -way for the arctic piping between the power plant and the end -user building, as the route is entirely within existing road rights -of -way and on city and AVEC property. 4.3.3 Permits Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address outstanding permit issues. ■ List of applicable permits • Anticipated permitting timeline • Identify and discussion of potential barriers A Heat Sales/Right-of-Entry Agreement will be required between AVEC and the end users to define the parties' responsibilities, detail the cost of recovered heat, and authorize the connection to the power plant heat recovery equipment. No other permits are anticipated for this heat recovery project. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 9 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application J=-, A6A&"wav, GEEV) ENERGY AUTHORITY 4.3.4 Environmental Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be addressed: Threatened or Endangered species • Habitat issues • Wetlands and other protected areas Archaeological and historical resources • Land development constraints Telecommunications interference ■ Aviation considerations ■ Visual, aesthetics impacts • Identify and discuss other potential barriers ANTHC will consider all potential environmental concerns associated with this project. ANTHC has extensive experience using the comprehensive Indian Health Service (IHS) environmental review procedures for conducting environmental analysis of all health and sanitation facilities projects in all stages of development, as outlined in the IHS Environmental Review Manual issued in January 2007. 4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues (Total Estimated Costs and Projected Revenues) The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of their cost data. For example: Applicants records or analysis, industry standards, consultant or manufacturer's estimates. 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the project. Cost information should include the following: • Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase • Requested grant funding • Applicant matching funds — loans, capital contributions, in -kind ■ Identification of other funding sources • Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system Is Projected development cost off roposed renewable energy system The total anticipated project cost is $1,015,580, including ANTHC's in -kind contribution. A detailed construction cost estimate is contained in the attached 2012 Heat Recovery Feasibility Study. The requested grant funding is $985,805 The remaining $29,580 is being donated by ANTHC in the form of project and program management services. 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the applicant. (Note: Operational costs are not eligible for grant funds however grantees are required to meet ongoing reporting requirements for the purpose of reporting impacts of projects on the communities they serve_) As with all heat recovery systems, the operating cost will be minimal. The controls are automated both at the power plant and at the water treatment plant. The most expensive components in the AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 10 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application ONEW ENERGY AUTHORn-Y heat recovery system are the heat exchangers, and they normally have a minimum of a 30-year life. Minor maintenance costs will occur periodically, but they will be limited to valves, pumps, and possibly some replacement glycol. Approximately $500 per year should be budgeted for maintenance. 4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale The power purchase/sale information should include the following: • Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s) • Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range • Proposed rate of return from grant -funded project A standard Heat Sales Agreement will be executed between the power company and the City of Noorvik. The agreement will define the terms and methods for heat sales. Typical heat sales agreements charge end users the equivalent of one third of the cost of the fuel displaced. This amount is much lower than the retail price of fuel in the village. A standard BTU meter will be used to measure the amount of recovered heat used at the water treatment plant. 4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in evaluating the project. Renewable Energy Source The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis. Annual average resource availability. Equivalent of 18,600 gallons diesel oil of surplus plant heat Unit depends on project type (e.g. wind speed, hydropower output,'biomass fuel) Existing Energy Generation and Usage a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt' grid, leave this section blank) i. Number of generators/boilers/other Detroit Diesel Series 60 DDEC4 (with marine jacket installed) ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other iii. Generator/boilers/other type iv. Age of generators/boilers/other v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other Fuel Oil Boilers in water treatment plant 5+ years 75% b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Annual O&M cost for labor $300 ii. Annual O&M cost for non -labor $200 c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) 1 The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden Valley Electric Association, the City of Seward Electric Department, Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage Municipal Light and Power. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 11 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application MME)ENERGY AUTHDrirrY i. Electricity [kWh] ii. Fuel usage Diesel [gal] 18,600 Gallons of Number 1 fuel oil equivalent of surplus heat Other iii. Peak Load iv. Average Load v. Minimum Load vi, Efficiency vi i. Future trends d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] 18,600 gallons of Number 1 fuel oil equivalent of surplus heat ii. Electricity [kWh] iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] vi. Other Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage (Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels) a) Proposed renewable capacity Surplus waste heat from the power plant (Wind, Hydro, Biomass, other) [kW or MMBtu/hr] b) Proposed annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable) i. Electricity [kWh] ii. Heat [MMBtu] 18,600 gallons of Number 1 fuel oil equivalent of surplus heat c) Proposed annual fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] ii. Coat [tons or MMBtu] iii. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] iv. Other Project Cost aj Total capital cost of new system b) Development cost c) Annual O&M cost of new system d) Annual fuel cost Project Benefits AEA13-006 Grant Application $985,805 $500 Page 12 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application a) Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity ENERGY AUTHORITY ii. Heat 18,600 gallons of Number 1 fuel oil equivalent of surplus heat M. Transportation b) Current price of displaced fuel $4.58/gallon, per heat recovery feasibility study c) Other economic benefits d) Alaska public benefits $85,188 in fuel oil Power Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for power purchase/sale Project Analysis a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio 2.2 ri Payback (years) 11.6 (heat recovery feasibility study) 4.4.5 Proposed Biomass System Information Please address the following items, if know. (For Biomass Projects Only) • What woody biomass technology will be installed (cord wood, pellets, chips, briquettes, pucks). • Efficiency of the biomass technology. • Thermal or electric application. • Boiler efficiency. • Displaced fuel type and amount. • Estimated tons of wood pellets or chips (specify) to be used per year, and average moisture percentage. • Estimated cords of wood to be used per year, specify whether dry or green and the moisture percentage. • Ownership/Accessibility. Who owns the land and are their limitations and restrictions to accessing the biomass resource? • Inventory data. How much biomass is available on an annual basis and what types (species) are there, if known? AEA137006 Grant Application Page 13 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application SECTION 5— PROJECT BENEFIT INOW-) ENERGY AUTHORITY Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following: ■ Potential annual fuel displacement (gallons and dollars) over the lifetime of the evaluated renewable energy project • Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price, RCA tariff, or cost based rate) ■ Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits) Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or programs that might be available) • Discuss the non -economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project The potential fuel displacement is 18,600 gallons of the 21,000 gallons of fuel used at the water treatment plant last year. The cost of the fuel is $4.58 per gallon (summer 2012). The annual cost of fuel displaced for the water treatment plant therefore equals $85,188. Over the 30-year life of the heat recovery system, the savings will be $2,555,640 in today's dollars. Assuming a heat sales agreement specifying a heat sales rate of 30% of displaced oil, the facilities will save $1,788,948 and AVEC will receive new revenue of $766,692 over the 20 years. There are no other known incentives or revenue streams that will result from this project. The benefits of this project to the community include a reduction in the amount of fuel required by the community, a much more efficient use of the recovered engine heat, and a direct benefit to each community member due to the lower cost to produce, store, and deliver water. SECTION f-- SUSTAiNABILITY Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a minimum: ■ Proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered. • How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project ■ Identification of operational issues that could arise. • A description of operational costs including on -going support for ally back-up or existing systems that may be require to continue operation ■ Commitment to reporting the savings and benefits This project increases the sustainability of the water treatment plant by reducing its operating cost by $2,555,640 over the 30-year life of the project. The minimal maintenance and operating cost can be funded out of its revenue stream and out of its savings over the 30-year life of the project. The existing boilers will be maintained in the water treatment plant as a backup to the heat recovery system. The City of Noorvik is committed to meeting all reporting requirements over the entire length of the reporting period. SECTION 7 — READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS Discuss what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed with work once your grant is approved. Tell us what you may have already accomplished on the project to date and identify other grants AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 14 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Mu Grant Application �ENERGYAUTHORFY that may have been previously awarded for this project and the degree you have been able to meet the requirements. of previous grants. A detailed heat recovery study has been completed and is attached to this application. The intent is to proceed with this project as soon as design and construction funding is available. SECTION 8-- LOCAL SUPORT Discuss what local support or possible opposition there may be regarding your project. Include letters of support from the community that would benefit from this project. The City of Noorvik , which owns the water treatment plant, is submitting this application. ANTHC has provided a match for the project as well as a letter of support. There is no known opposition to this project. SECTION 9 -- GRANT BUDGET Tell us how much you want in grant funds Include any investments to date and funding sources, how much is being requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an applicant. AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 15 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 ®� Grant Application ®ENERGYAUTHORCTY Source of Matching Funds: llestonESIGN PHASE Anticipated RE- Fund Grantee Cashlln- Milestone or Task Completion Grant Matching kind/Federal TOTALS Date Funds GrantslOther State Gra nts/Othe r (List milestones based on phase and type of project. See Milestone list below. ) In -kind ANTHC Project Management 9/1/2013 $0 $2,238 project/program $2,238 Throughout management Conduct Kick-off Meeting 10/1 /2013 $2,000 $2,000 35 % design with Cost Estimate 10/1/2013 $15,000 $15,000 Complete 95 % Design with 12/1/2013 $45,592 $45,592 Cost Estimate Construction Bid Documents 3/1/2014 $10,000 $10,000 Final Business Plan 3/1/2014 $1,000 $1,000 Negotiated heat sales 12/1/2014 $1,000 $1,000 agreement AEAApproves moving ahead to 5/1/2014 $0 $0 construction TOTALS $74,592 $2,238 $76,830 Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $0 Travel & Per Diem $0 Equipment Materials & Supplies Contractual Services " $74,592 $2,238 $76,830 Construction Services Other TOTALS $74,5921 $2,2381 $76,830 AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 16 of 20 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Jr�.�Grant ApplicationENERGY AUTHORITY Source of Matching Furxis: Anticipated ICE- Fund Cash/In- CONSTRUCTION PHASE Completion Grant Grantee IcindlFederal TOTALS Milestone or Task pate Funds Matching Grants/Other State Grants/Other (List milestones based on phase and type of project. See Milestone list below. ) Project Management Througout 5/1/2015 $27,342 $27,342 Pre-Const. meeting with Schedule and cost estimate with 8/1/2014 $5,000 $5,000 ANTHC construction department. Material Procurement and 8/1/2014 $160,000 $160,000 Mobilization On -site Construction 8/1/2015 $714,213 $714,213 Conduct periodic site visits 8/1/2015 $5,000 $5,000 Conduct Substantial Completion 9/1/2015 $5,000 $5,000 Inspection Startup and Testing 9/1/2015 $10,000 $10,000 Clear Punch list Items 10/1/2015 $10,000 $10,000 Project Closeout 11/1/2015 $2,000 $2,000 $911,213 $27,342 $938,555 Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $200,000 $200,000 Travel & Per Diem $20,000 $20,000 Equipment Materials & Supplies $0 Contractual Services " $691,213 $27,342 $718,555 Construction Services Other TOTALS $911,213 $27,342 $938,555 AEA13-006 Grant Application Page 17 of 20 7/3//2012 Authorized Signers & Resolution Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant A idEND lication 4MILDENERWAUMFlTY SECTION 11 — ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WITH YOUR APPLICATION: A. Contact information, resumes of Applicant's Project Manager, trey staff, partners, consultants, and suppliers per application form Section 3.1 and 3.4. Applicants are asked to separate resumes submitted with applications, If the individuals do not want their resumes posted. B. Letters demonstrating local support per application form Section 8. C. An electronic version of the entire application on CD per RFA Section 1.7. D. Governing Body Resolution or other formal action taken by the applicant's governing body or management per RFA Section 1.4 that: - Commits the organization to provide the matching rpsources for project at the match amounts indicated in the application. - Authorizes the individual who signs the application has the authority to commit the organization to the obligations under the grant. - Provides as point of contact to represent the applicant for purposes of this application. - Certifies the applicant is in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local, laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations. E. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that this application for a renewable energy grant is truthful and correct, and that the applicant is in compliance with, and will continue to comply with, all federal and state laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations and that they can indeed commit the entity to these obligations. Print Name I Kenny Wells Sr. Signature Title I Mayor Date I August 30, 2012 Renewable Enemy Fund Round 6 sue) 40WGrant ApplicationidEW)FNERGYAUTHORTY LSECTION40 -- AUTHORIZED SIGNERS FORM Community/Grantee Name: n l� 0� N �Q t�1 k Regular Elecfi is held: Date: Ct t4 JS�- CUk� lb /V I J Authorized Grant 91i Printed Name er s Title F_ .n ti Term I authorize the above person(s) to sign Grant Documents: (Highest ranking organization/community/municipal official) Printed Name pp hl1 MA Grantee Contact Information: Mailing Address: - - Phone Number. ILFax Number: I E-mail Address: Title Signature Term j Signature Federal Tax ID #: � � - � � Please submit an updated form whenever there is a change to the above information. ��D RESOLUTION # 1 .;L - Oy A RESOLUTION REQUESTING PUNNING FROM THE ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY, ALASKA RENEWABLE ENERGY FUND AND COMMITMENT BY THE CITY OF NOORVIK. WHEREAS, The City ofNoorvik, hereinafter called the Council, is a governing body in the City of Noorvik, Alaska, and; WHEREAS, The Alaska Energy Authority, hereinafter called AEA, may provide assistance necessary to help address the energy needs of our community; WHEREAS, The Council desires to seek and utilize renewable sources of energy in order to lower costs for residents while making our community more economically viable and sustainable into the future in order to guarantee our way of life for current and future generations; WHEREAS, The Council authorizes the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium to work with The City of Noorvik to develop, implement and manage the project for which we are seeking funding from AEA; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council hereby requests that the AEA appropriate funds through the Renewable Energy Fund to complete Heat Recoveryfor the Water Treatment Plant; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council grants authority to the individual signing this resolution to commit The City ofNoorvik to obligations under the grant; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The City ofNoorvik is in compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws including existing credit and federal tax obligation; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that ANTHC is hereby authorized through a Cooperative Project Agreement to negotiate, execute, and administer any and all documents, contracts, expenditures and agreements as required for the City ofNoorvik and managing funds on behalf of this entity, including any subsequent amendments to said agreements; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council hereby authorizes ANTHC or its representatives to enter upon or cross community land for the purposes of assisting; the Council in carrying out this project. 1, the and rsigned, hereby certify that the Council is composed of _� members of who L, constituting a QUORUM were present and that the forego resolution was PASSED AND APPROVED by the Council this day of , 2012. Vote: Yeas Nays Mayor, Kenny Wells Sr. AC ATTEST: City Clerk, Margaret Co%1-141 Letters of Support *Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Division of Environmental Health and Engineering 3900 Ambassador Drive • Suite 301 • Anchorage, Alaska 99508 • Phone: (907) 729-3600 • Fax: (907) 729-4090 • www.antlic.org September 20, 2012 Honorable Denny Wells Mayor, City of Noorvik PO Box 146 Noorvik, Alaska 99763 Dear Mayor Wells: Re: Letter of Commitment for matching funds to a proposal for Alaska Energy Authority, Renewable Energy Fund Round VI. It is with pleasure that the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC), Division of Environmental Health and Engineering (DEHE) is partnering with the City of Noorvik in your proposed project to the Renewable Energy Fund of the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA). The Noorvik Heat Recovery Project is one of exceptional importance to the future energy needs of your community and one that ANTHC DEHE fully supports. In support of your project, ANTHC DEHE will commit an in -kind match as indicated on the application for project management staff time to manage the project. These matching funds will be tracked and reported to as required for purposes of the AEA reporting requirements if the award is granted by AEA. We wish you every success on your proposal and look forward to working with you on this important project. Sincerely, Steven M.Weaver, P.E. Senior Director AVECO� September 19, 2012 Honorable Kenny Wells Mayor City of Noorvik PO Box 146 Noorvik, AK 99769 Regarding: Letter of Support for Heat Recovery Project Dear Honorable Mayor Wells: Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (AVEC) understands that ANTHC is seeking funding for a heat recovery project in Noorvik. We believe this project is very important to the community of Noorvik and would like to offer our support. This project would use valuable recovered heat from our AVEC power plant. The project will help stabilize the cost of heating and will help to make our community more sustainable. AVEC fully supports the construction of the heat recovery system. This project will help mitigate the rising cost of fuel and is necessary to providing reliable, cost-effective heat in Noorvik's community buildings. ANTHC is welcome to include this letter in the grant application package. Sincerely, Meera Kohler President and CEO 4831 EAGLE STREET * ANCHORAGE, ALASKA * PHONE (907) 561-1818 * FAX (907) 562-4086 Resumes Supplemental Documents NOORVIK, ALASKA HEAT RECOVERY STUDY PREPARED BY: Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Division of Environmental Health and Engineering 1901 Bragaw St, Ste 200, Anchorage AK 99508 Phone (907) 729-3600 / Fax (907) 729-4090 September 20, 2012 ,w � • �� •• . V�// .......v . a•••.0 �• WI IAJM1 L. FItASW ' Aw ME - 10169 sSr / �� FFSS� ~��r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Noorvik power house and WTP building were evaluated for heat recovery potential. The total annual heating fuel used by the WTP is verified by the community as approximately 21,000 gallons. The estimated fuel savings realized by implementing a heat recovery system is approximately 18,600 gallons. The estimated cost for the heat recovery project is $986,000. The simple payback based on a fuel cost of $4.58/gallon is 11.6 years. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) reviewed the feasibility of providing recovered heat from the existing AVEC power plant to the existing WTP building in Noorvik. ANTHC also developed a budgetary project cost estimate based on Force Account Construction, including Engineering and Construction Administration. The existing WTP building provides heat to the circulating water lines and heat to one of the water storage tank (WST). The system was not designed for waste heat and will require controls and installation of new heat transfer equipment, including a new heat exchanger and new circulating pumps. This building is estimated to consume approximately 21,000 gallons of diesel per year. Significant work will be required at the power plant, including installation of 3 heat exchangers, insulating existing piping and new controls. This is included in the cost estimate. In addition, AVEC requires a heat sales agreement which will result in approximately 30% of the fuel savings to be paid to AVEC. Additional assumptions have been made in the development of this report, including, but not limited to, the proposed arctic piping route, building heating loads, and flow rates and pressure drops of the power plant heat recovery system. It is anticipated that refinements in arctic pipe size and routing, pump and heat exchanger sizing, and other design elements will be required as the project progresses to final design. Available information was obtained from AVEC regarding the 2011 power plant electrical loads. End -user annual fuel use was obtained fr6rh-a variety of sources, including the City, Alaska Rural Utility Cooperative (ARU9), and engineering estimates. Reported fuel consumption was used to validate engineering estimates. Site visits were made to the existing WTP and washeteria to cor1firm accuracy of information obtained. 2.0 OVERVIEW The purpose of this study is to provide an estimate of the heat that can be recovered from the AVEC power plant diesel engines and used fo offset heating oil consumption at the nearby public buildings. Useable recovered heat is quantified in gallghs of heating fuel saved using a gross heating value of 134,000 BTU per'gallon of #1 arctic�diesel fuel and an overall boiler efficiency of 75% for a net heating value of 100,000 BTU per gallon. The public buildings eligible for heat recovery are located within 1300-foot radius of the AVEC power plant. This analysis evaluates the potential to provide recovered heat to the nearby Water treatment plant, but the city office building and school are also within range. The estimated average annual heating fuel consumption for the nearby WTP is 21,000 gallons. 3.0 ESTIMATED RECOVERED HEAT UTILIZATION A heat recovery utilization spreadsheet has been developed to estimate the recoverable heat based on monthly total electric power production, engine heat rates, building heating demand, washeteria loads, heating degree days, passive losses for power plant heat and piping, and arctic piping losses. The spreadsheet utilizes assumed time -of -day variations for electric power production and heat demand. Power generation data from AVEC for fiscal year 2011 is used in the spreadsheet. The estimated heat rejection rate for the lead power plant genset, a Detroit Diesel Series 60 DDEC4 (with marine jacket installed), is used to estimate available recovered heat. Heating degree-days for Noorvik were utilized for this site. All arctic piping is assumed to be routed above grade. The spreadsheet uses monthly heating degree-days to distribute annual fuel consumption by month. The end -user hourly heat load is compared to the hourly available heat from the power plant, less power plant heating loads and parasitic piping losses, and the net delivered heat to the end -user is determined. Following is a summary of annual fuel use and estimated heat utilization in equivalent gallons of fuel for each building: Facility Estimated Estimated Heat Annual Fuel Use Delivered (Gallons) (Gallons) Water Treatment Plant 21,300 18,600 4.0 HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION: The heat recovery system captures jacket water heat generated by the AVEC power plant that is typically rejected to the atmosphere by the radiators. The recovered heat is transferred via above -grade arctic piping to the end users. The objective is to reduce the consumption of expensive heating fuel by utilizing available recovered heat. Although heat recovery is an excellent method of reducing heating fuel costs, recovered heat is a supplementary heat source and it is imperative that the end -user facility heating systems are operational at all times. Hot engine coolant is piped through a plate heat exchanger located at the power plant. Heat is transferred from the engine coolant to the recovered heat loop without mixing the fluids. Controls at the power plant are used to prevent sub -cooling of the generator engines and reducing electric power production efficiency. The recovered heat fluid is pumped through buried insulated pipe to the end -user facilities, and is typically tied into the end -user heating system using a plate heat exchanger. 4.1 AVEC PLANT TIE-IN A marine jacket will be added to the lead power plant generator. All generator cooling piping will be insulated with a minimum of 1.5-in rubber foam insulation and have an aluminum jacket where exposed to the weather. All valves will be either bronze ball valves or lug style butterfly valves with seals compatible with 50/50 glycol/water mixtures at 200F. Air vents, thermometers, pressure gauges, drain valves, and pressure relief valves will also be provided. Additional controls will be added, including a BTU meter and motorized bypass valve for coolant temperature control. 4.2 ARCTIC PIPING (Recovered Heat Loop) The proposed arctic piping is based on ANTHC's standard arctic pipe design with a 3-in fiber reinforced polypropylene carrier pipe (Aquatherm Climatherm SDR11), 4-in polyurethane foam insulation, and aluminum outer jacket. The piping will be supported on sleepers on the ground surface or helical piers where the ground isn't sufficiently stable. The heat recovery piping will run from the power plant alongside the road to the to the end -user building. Circulation pumps located at the WTP building will circulate heating fluid from the AVEC facility. When the WTP is not actively consuming recovered heat, the system will throttle down heating fluid flow to minimize power consumption. The recovered heat fluid will be a 50/50 Propylene Glycol/Water solution to provide freeze protection to the piping. 4.3 END -USER BUILDING TIE-INS End -user building tie-ins typically consist of brazed plate heat exchangers with a heat injection pump to prevent back feeding heat to AVEC or other users. Plate heat exchangers located in the end -user mechanical room will be tied into the boiler return piping to preheat the boiler water prior to entering the boiler. The maximum anticipated delivered recovered heat supply temperature is about 190F. When there is insufficient recovered heat to meet the building heating load, the building heating system (boiler or heater) will fire and add heat. Off the shelf controls will lock out the recovered heat system when there is insufficient recovered heat available. Typical indoor piping will be type L copper tube with solder joints. Isolation valves will be solder end bronze ball valves or flanged butterfly valves. All piping will be insulated with a minimum of 1-in insulation with an all -service jacket. Flexibility will be provided where required for thermal expansion and differential movement. Air vents, thermometers, pressure gauges, drain valves, and pressure relief valves will also be provided. The end user facility will also receive a BTU meter to provide recovered heat use totalization and instantaneous use. 4.4 RIGHTS -OF -WAY ISSUES There are no apparent conflicts with rights -of -ways for the arctic piping between the power plant and the end -user building, as the route is entirely within existing road rights -of -ways and on city and AVEC property. A Heat Sales/Right-of-Entry Agreement will be required between AVEC and the end users to define the parties' responsibilities, detail the cost of recovered heat, and authorize the connection to the power plant heat recovery equipment. 5.0 PRELIMINARY EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS The following initial equipment selections are sized and selected based on preliminary data and will require minor modifications to reflect final design. 5.1 Heat Exchangers Based on initial selected flow rates, brazed plate heat exchangers appear to be adequate for all locations. Initial heat exchanger selections are as follows. HX-1: (WTP). 400 MBH capacity Primary: 45 GPM 19OF EWT (50% ethylene glycol), 1.0 PSI max WPD Secondary: 45 GPM 185F LWT (50% propylene glycol) 1.0 PSI max WPD HX-2, HX-3, HX-4: (AVEC Station 1). 400 MBH capacity. Primary: 45 GPM 195F EWT (50% propylene glycol), 1.0 PSI max WPD Secondary: 45 GPM 185F LWT (50% propylene glycol) 1.0 PSI max WPD 5.2 Arctic Piping The length of heat recovery loop piping between the power plant and most distant facility is approximately 3600ft, round trip. The arctic piping utilizes 3-in carrier pipe to minimize pressure drop and reduce pumping energy. The pipe itself consists of a 3-in fiber reinforced polypropylene carrier pipe, 4" of polyurethane insulation and an aluminum outer jacket. The specified product is durable enough for direct exposure to the weather and resistant to crushing. 5.3 Circulating Pumps P-HR1: Heat recovery loop pump at Water Treatment Plant Flow = 45 GPM, Head = 45 ft Initial Selection: Grundfos TPE with integrated VFD. P-HR2: Heat injection pump in combined utility building. Flow = 45 GPM, Head = 15 ft Initial Selection: Grundfos 50-60F. 5.4 Expansion Tank Total heat recovery loop volume is approximately 4800 gallons. Pressure relief at the heat exchangers will be 45 PSIG and the maximum normal operating pressure will be 40 PSIG. ET-1: System requirements: 700 gallon tank and 360 gallon acceptance. Use (2) AMTROL ST-455 located at the water plant. 5.5 GLYCOL MAKEUP An existing glycol make-up system at the water treatment plant will provide make-up to the system. 5.6 CONTROLS Heat recovery system will use an off the shelf differential temperature controller to start/stop a heat injection pump. Control will provide load shedding, freeze protection, and prevent backfeeding of boiler heat into heat recovery system. In addition, A BTU meter will be provided, displaying instantaneous temperatures and heat transfer, as well as totalizing BTUs used. Differential Controllers: 1 required Tekmar Model 155 differential temperature control BTU Meters: BTU-1 WTP Building: KEP BTU meter with 2" magnetic flow meter and matching temperature elements. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Estimated construction costs were determined based on prior recent heat recovery project experience, and include materials, equipment, freight, labor, design, construction management, and startup and testing. All work at the power plant and WTP, along with design and construction management/administration for the complete project, is included in the Base Project cost. Incremental costs for arctic pipe, end -user building renovations, and overhead and freight are estimated individually for each of the other end -user buildings (refer to attached cost estimate). The estimated project cost for is $986,000. Estimated fuel savings are about 14,500 gallons. Using a 2011 fuel price of $4.50/gallon results in estimated community savings of $66,300 for a simple payback of 11.6 years. 500 F! 450 400 350 300 z x 250 Co 200 150 100 50 0 Noorvik Recovered Heat Utilization January February March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec MONTH � WTP Heating Demand (MBH) Available Recovered Heat 4000 3500 3000 2500 J 2000 1500 1000 500 0 January February March Noorvik Recovered Heat Utilization i Avoided Fuel Use (Gal) May Boiler Fuel Demand (gal) June July Aug Sept MONTH Oct Nov Dec ANTHC DEHE Division of Environmental Health & Engineering; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium 1901 Bragaw Street, Suite 200 ject Name: Noorvik Heat Recovery Project ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 ct Number: TBD (907) 729-3609 Engineer: WLF Checked: FAX (907) 729-3729 rision Date: 22-May-12 e-mail., wfHiam.fraser@anthc org Print: 11-Jul-12 Fib: 0:0ocumants and $elpnpa wdtym.I eseNtppi oellnn Data\OpenTeat\DM\Temp\[DEHE-it199330- l-Noawik_Heat_Recovery_FeasiMlry_Caks.XLSX]Sheetl Find: Feasibility of Heat Recovery from Stebbins Generator Facility to existing WTP, new WTP, Clinic, Washeteria, and Head Start residence Given: Monthly KWH produced by existing Stebbins & St. Micheal generator plants in 2011 WTP reported Fuel consumption 7400 Gal / Year Monthly KW H Produced by existing St. Michael generator plant Heating Degree days for Stebbins Assumptions: Estimated Peak heat loss for 1 WSTs: 40,000 BTU/Hr Estimated Peak heat loss for Old WTP 150,000 BTU/Hr Design Air Temperature: -50 Deg F Design Water Temperature 40 Deg F WTP Space Temperature 60 Deg F 1740 BTU to radiators / KW Power Generated (Estimated benefit of marine jacket on generator) Estimated Boiler AFUE: 75% (Optimistic) Community Estimated Fuel Price: 54.58 per gal Heat loss per below calculations AVEC Estimated Fuel Price $4 58 per gal Heat loads per below calculations AVEC Heat Sales Agreement: 30% Avoided fuel cost at AVEC's Price Above Ground Heat Recovery System in Arctic Pipe Calculations: Existing Water Plant Heat Loss: Building design heating loss: 150,000 BTU/H Heat loss / degree of OSA temp 1.363.6 BTHIH' Oeg F Main Heat Loss: heat trace temperature: Air Temperature: sulation K value value = xn& of Above ground Pipe eswn Heat Loss: Loss 1 Degree OSA 70 Degrees F -50 Degrees F 3 Inch foam ins. 4 Pipe OD (Inches) 0.16 BTU x in / (ft^2 x hr x Deg F) 10.938 Ft^2 x hr x Deg F 1270 Ft 14,591 BTU/hr 11.49 BTU/hr ` Ft 121.6 BTU 1hr ' Deg F Generator Module Heat Laads load from Lmrig quarters design heat loss 20000 BTU/Hr Control module Heat Loss 20000 BTU/Hr Storage modules Heat Loss 30000 BTU/Hr Generator Modules Heat Loss 40000 BTU/Hr Total 110000 BTU/Hr Heat loss / degree of OSA temp: 1000 BTU/Hr` deg F ANTHC DEHE Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium jest Name: Noondk Heat Recovery Project ct Number: TBD Engineer: WLF Checked: rision Date: 22-May-12 Print: 11-Jul-12 Calculations (Continued) Raw Water Line Heat Loss: heat trace Temperature Air Temperature: Insulation K value R value = Length of Above ground Pipe Design Heat Loss: Heat Loss / Degree OSA teml 70 Degrees F -50 Degrees F 2 Inch foam ins. 3 Pipe OD (Inches) 0.16 BTU x In / (ft^2 x hr x Deg F) 10.114 FtA2 x hr x Deg F 450 Ft 4,193 BTU/hr 9.32 BTU/hrFt 34.9 BTU /hr • Deg F Division of Environmental Health & Engineering 1901 Bragaw Street, Suite 200 ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 (907)729-3609 FAX (907) 729-3729 e-mail., v.ilfiam.fraser@anihc.org File: C:\Documents and Date\OpenText\DM\Tamp\[DEHEal199330♦rl-Noowik_Heat Recovery_Feasibilty_Caks.XLSX]Sheetl Peak Storage Tank Heat Loss: 40.000 BTU / Hr Heat Loss / degree of OSA temp: 444 BTU l Hr Law Water Heating Load law water anticipated flow rate 12 5 GPM law water temperature: 35 Deg F reatment Process Temperature 40 Deg F law water heati rig load: 31250 BTU /Hr Above grade Arctic utilidor Emperical observed heat loss, typical arctic utilidor, good repair 40.0 BTU / LF Interior utilidor temperature 40 Deg F Design Temperature -50 Deg F Utilidor Height 18 inches Utilidor width 30 inches Utilidor insulation thickness 4 Inch foam Nominal infiltration rate 0.50 ACH Length 16600 Ft Heat loss per foot 39.1 BTUH / Ft Design Heat loss 648256 BTU / Hr Heat Loss / Degree OSA temp 7202.84375 arasitic Generator Cooling System Losses esign Air Temperature: -55 Deg F .MOT valve leak Rate (average) 1 GPM of CoolantTemperature 180 Deg F esign Heat Loss: 24930 BTU/Hr eat loss / Degree of OSA temp: 106.1 Ground Heat Recovery Pipe Heat Loss: Heat Recovery loop Temperature Air Temperature: Insulation K value R value = Length of Above ground Pipe Design Heat Loss: OSA 180 Degrees F -50 Degrees F 4 Inch foam ins. 3 Pipe OD (Inches) 0.16 BTU x in / (ft^2 x hr x Deg F) 15.510 FtA2 x hr x Deg F 3600 Ft 41,929 BTU/hr 11.65 182.3 ANTHC DEHE DnOsionofEnvimnmentalHealth &Engineering Alaska (dative Tribal Health Consortium 1901 Bragaw Street, Suite 200 ject Name: Noorvik Heat Recovery Project ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 ct Number: TBD (907) 729-3609 Engineer: WLF Checked: FAX (907) 729-3729 dsion Date: 22-May-12 a -mail: wilkam.fraser@anthc.org Print: 11-Jul-12 File: CADocuments and Date\OpenTezt\DM\Temp\IDEHHN99330vl-Noowik Heaf_Recovery_Feasibiky_Caks XLSX]Sheett Calculations (Continued) AVEC Available Parasitic Estimated Estimated Cooling Available Htg Degree Htg Degree Htg Degree MBTU/H System Heat for KWH / Days / Month Days / Month Days / Month rejected Losses (MBH recovery Month Month Days / Month Av KW (40F) (60F) (180F) from Engines / Hr) (MBH/ Hr) January 230107 31 309 1,426 2,046 5,766 538 20 519 February 195257 29 262 1,374 1,954 5,434 457 20 437 March 187423 30 252 1,403 2,003 5,603 438 20 419 April 165160 30 222 1,011 1,611 5,211 386 18 368 May 144161 31 194 428 1,048 4,768 337 16 321 June 117623 30 158 36 636 4,236 275 15 260 July 119073 31 160 - 353 4,073 278 14 265 Aug 136922 31 184 - 407 4,127 320 14 306 Sept 157386 30 212 90 690 4,290 368 15 353 Oct 175124 31 235 685 1,305 5,025 410 17 392 Nov 195961 30 263 1,116 1,716 5,316 458 19 439 Dec 2100311 31 282 1,423 2,043 5,763 4911 20 471 Recovered Heat Transmission Losses: AVEC Facility Sum Heat Heating Above Recovery load Ground Pipe Losses Month (MBH/Hr) Loss (MBTUH) (MBTUH) January ` 66 34 100 1February 67 34 102 March j 67 34 101 April 54 32 85 May 34 28 62 June 21 26 47 July 11 24 35 Aug 13 24 37 Sept 23 26 49 Oct 42 30 72 Nov 57 32 90 Dec 66 34 100 WTP Heating Demand I WTP Building Force Main Raw Water Raw Water Grc Loop Sum Heat Heat Loss Heat Loss Line Heat WST Heat Heat Add Heat Add Demand (MBH) I (MBH) Loss (MBH) Loss (MBH) (MBH) (MBTU/H) (MBH) 90 6 2 20 31 331 490 92 6 2 21 31 341 493 91 6 2 21 31 337 487 73 4 1 15 31 243 367 46 2 0 6 31 99 185 29 0 0 1 31 9 70 16 - 31 - 47 18 31 - 49 31 0 0 1 31 22 86 57 3 1 10 31 159 261 78 5 1 17 31 268 400 90 6 2 20 31 331 479 ANTHC DEHE Division ofEnvironmental HeaM&Engineering Alaska Nadve Tribal Health Consortium 1901 Bragaw Street, Suite 200 ject Name: Noorvik Heat Recovery Project ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 ct Number: TBD (907)729-3609 Engineer: WLF Checked: rislon Date: 22-May-12 Print: 11-Jul-12 Calculations (Continued) Available Recovere t3mrnated Available Heat for WTP Heating Recovered recovery Demand Heat Benefit Month (MBH/ Hr) (MBH) (MBH) January 419 419 February 335 44C 335 March 318 435 318 April 282 321 282 May 259 149 148 June 213 38 38 my 229 16 16 Aug 268 18 18 Sept 304 53 53 Oct 321 220 220 Nov 350 351 350 Dec 372 427 372 Total: FAX (907) 729-3729 e-mail: WI§am.fraser@anthc org File: C1Documents and SelangMW Ilnrn f-a- / ppliceaon DatakopenTeztlDWTempl[DEHEal199330vl-Noomik_Heat_Recovery_Feaslbiky_Caks.XLSX]Sheet1 Estimated Fuel Savines WTP Recovered Recovered Estimated Total Fuel Heat Heat Avoided Recovered Savings to Fuel Demand Demand Avoided Fuel Fuel Cost Heat Charges Community Month (Gal) (gal) Use (Gal) (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) January 3,502 3502 3098 $14,190 $4,257 $9,933 February 3,048 3048 2322 $10,633 $3,190 $7,443 March 3,115 3115 2276 $10,424 $3,127 $7,297 pril 2,299 2299 2024 $9,268 $2,781 $6,488 May 1,093 1093 1093 $5,004 $1,501 $3,503 June 270 270 270 $1,238 $371 $867 July 115 115 115 $526 $158 $369 Aug 133 133 133 $607 $182 $425 Sept 383 383 383 $1,753 $526 $1,227 Oct 1,627 1627 1627 $7,454 $2,236 $5,218 Nov 2,518 2518 2507 $11,484 $3,445 $8,039 Dec 3,163 3163 2752 $12,602 $3,781 $8,822 2126 18S991 $85,1941 $25,5551 $59,629 21266 a 0 i tl s C4 c �s NOORVIK, ALASKA ANTHC RECOVERED HEAT STUDY 5r urs�c0. i Is�wo b'� NW70W =M 1 L f A ; 5 I5�^NO �� � ' • O . d��UNAI.ASKA � SHEET LIST TABLE Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 COVER 2 SITE PLAN 3 SYSTEM SCHEMATICS I 4 SYSTEM SCHEMATICS II 5 DETAILS Alaska Native NOORVIK, AK Tribal Health Consortium ANTHC RECOVERED HEAT STUDY Division of Environmental Health and Engineering DATE: 07-11-12 LAYOUT: COVER 1001 Srfgew Street, Suite 200 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA, 1195093440 DRAWN BY: TH FILE NAME: ORV—G—STSITF (B0� 72B-38g0 CHECKED BY: WF ISHEET 1 OF 5 111MIllim USER: IEELLORIN FILE P:\NUUI KNUWV--UESIGNNWV-kNL3!Fy_STUI)y CURY-G-SiSIT.DWL; PLOT DATE: 1/lTfAOi2 10,55 AY CDO +� CD cl ° ° CD - �I r DmD J V 0 O Z D rm Z 0 O , O \ N nw a d � Ir f m D -� x m x o CO N Z n m Z n <0 m M mG In p m m 0 = y Z C DV D ~ �{ a W �X v o � � < _ 1 � U � USER- JEELLURIN FILE TO AVEC 4T RECOVER' PLUI UAIE (IIV.Ai ILM M1 WATER TREATMENT PLANT --------------------------------- END USER I HYDRONIC SYSTEM I 1 I I I I i I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 L---------------------------------- TIC - .v.m " GENERATOR MODULE 1 — RADIATOR— — — I ON TR OL I TO WTP r--- PANEL I i i i ! 's3�soo�a I k I T � I jL I mZ sL 7 7 s . S. TO / FROM I g 3 ? I HX-2 GENERATOR I n'�In — — — L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J go ! — — — GENERATOR MODULE 2 RADIATOR 3 ON TROL I I - - _- PANEL --- - a m I 1 1 I 1 d o I I 1 T 1 I I I m m < C � k TO / FROM I N a HX-3 I GENERATOR I L-----.----------------_..J �Z — — — — — — — — — — — — GENERATOR MODULE 3 RADIATOR < I ONTROL m <_ 2 I i - r-- PANEL ---, I 1 1 m m o " Z te m I I 1 T X I 1 M C ! �i � 0 ! < x Ln i TO / FROM ! Ln I HX-4 GENERATOR l N rL----------------------J Al HEAT RECOVERY PIPING SCHEMATIC - AVEC 2IRMN m x O m N 1= m Ln Ln H m a z x 0 Z 00 m M 0 v 7C m D c rrn r PLOT UALIU TIZI12012 10:55 AN 2" WIDE GALVANIZED STEEL PACKING STRAP I� 3/8" 0 x 6" GALVANIZED L \ \ LAG BOLTS WITH 2" 0 \ \ \ \ \ GALVANIZED WASHERS \ \ \ \ \ 4" x 12" x 40" IN �✓' 2" x 12 x 40 TREATED TIMBER PLANKS AS REQUIRED FOR LEVELING Ai SLEEPERS PIPE SUPPORT Noorvlk Heat Recovery Cost Estimate Noorvik Heat Recovery Cost Estimate LABOR MATERIALS Production u w Rate Days E A m m ELEMENT Week ' cn ' t m o a o-'Item No. Cost Ea Total Cost Fre ht Materials F;60hr. CL o `m cLi is E a 3 J35 m w O w a a U -j O , o. Total + Freght 126 85 10835 35 Labor 17esign Civil 80 81 20.0 Fixed estimate 100 /hr. $ 18000 ISRL Visit 0 $ 1.100 $ - Mechanical 1 a4 81 35.0 Fixed estimate 100 t. $ 28.000 ISite Visit 2 S 1.100 $ 2.200. Electrical 88 8 15.0 Fixed estimate 100 /hr. S 12,0001 Site Visit 1 $ 1.100 is 1.100 i Des $ 56,000 i Total hours 576.3 156.7' 184.0 64.5 77.2 3V7.21 19.4 0.0 #W 5.0 Mohtlb=bn -Note ui ment ShipEN 0.0 $ $ - $ Takeoffs 1 1 1.0 2 S 2,600 $ - $ Tfainl 1 1 1.0 l 1 S 350 $ $ Materials RaceAong and Irivento 1 1 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 $ 2 315 S $ Set Lrp Materials StaraWafd 1 1 1.0 0.5 1 0.2 2 S 2.69011 $ $ .Expediting to Const Site 0.0 S $ - $ - Housing *Note Local Rental I IRental 45 $ 200 $ 9,000 S 9,000.00 Camp set up 3 1 1 S 6,430 11 $ S $ $ - $ 3" Above Ground Arctic Pipe 0.0 S - $ - $ - AMoffeet 36o0, 300 12.0 1 0.2 01 21 1 0 $ 27,928 Pipe 1 3600 $ 52 1 $ 187,200 $ 20,000 $207,200.00 Bridge Crossing 0.0 S - ffitlings_ 1880 140 -140 $ 25.200 1 $ 3,000 S 28,200_00 200 1 S 3,150 SI rs $ 25,200 Supports _ 1600 4.0 180 $ I $ 1.000 ; 26,200.00 Road Crossings 3 0.2 15.0 0.5 1 1 2 $ 37,800 1 lCulvert 120 $ 150 $ 18,000 $ 3,000 S 2i,000.00 $ Powef Punt connections $ - $ Coolin mococations 3 0.15 20.0 0.2 0.2 0.25 1 1 1 S 54,390 Pi & Fittin s 3 $ 20.000 $ 60,000 ; 4.000 S$ 64,000.00 HX installation 1 0.5 2.0 0.2 1 t $ 3,644 HX 3 $ 4,000 S 12,000 $ 1,500 S 13,500.00 Controls 1 1 1.0 0.5 2 S 3,070 Controls 3 S 10,000 $ 30,000 $ 600 S 30,800.00 Insulation U 3 0.5 6.0 2 $ 4,200 Insulation 3 $ 3,000 $ 9.000 S 500 $ 9,500.00 S WTP BLdg Connection Heating s modif[cations 1 1 0.2 &0 j1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1$ - S 13,050 1 [Pipe & Fittings 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 1.000 ; - $ 11,000.100 HX Inswh, Non 1 1 1.0 1 0.1 1 S 1,695 1 JHX 1 $ 4,000 $ 4.000 S 400 S 4.400.00 Controls 1 0.5 2.0 1 1 A_1.240_t lControls 5 $ 500 $ 2.500 5 350 $ 2,850.00 Expansion Tanks 3 3 1.0 1 1 S 1.610 Exp Tank 3 S 1.500 $ 4,500 S 1,OE10 S 5,500.00 Insulation Upgrades 1 1 1.0 1 $ 3,50 Pump 2 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 S 150 S 4,150.00 S BTU Meter Install_ Cnnneetion and install 1 28 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.1 1 1 BTUMeter 1 $ 2,500 2.5 ; 00 - ; 150 $ - S �Z650.01) S 4,004 P remmIn and interface 1 2.3 0.4 0.1 1 $ 517 Flow meter 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 S 150 $ 2,650A0 $ Support Activities I S S Fuel and Lubricants Startup .Operator Training��iil•iiiiiii ����� ILiterature and References ��ffNMFMTM �kAWAIM , ��iil•iiiiiiii ����� � '• ii iiiiiiiiiii ����� Final inspection Punch L �i�iiiiiiiiiii ' •' ���� Asbuilting - Local accomodations are available. - AM exterior piping run on sleepers above Power plant is mostly configured and - System control can be accomplished Wo a i�il•iiiii�Cii i�il•iiiii �i�il•iiiiiii��l� �: - Crew leader functions will be accomplished by Superentendant, or in lieu of Super. ii�iiil•iiii�ii ����� f �i�iiiiaiil•ii i �� r, T . a i - ii�iiiii�iiiii �i�iiiiil•iiiii �