Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAEA Renewable Energy Fund Round VI - Igiugig Wind.Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application ~A~ ENERGY AUTHORITY ~CTION 1 -APPLICANT INFORMATION Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal) Lake and Peninsula Borouah Type of Entity: Borough Fiscal Year End: June 30 Tax ID # Tax ID # 92-0128922 Tax Status: For-profit or __x_non-profit ( check one) Mailing Address Physical Address PO Box 495 King Salmon, AK 99613 100 Jensen Road, King Salmon, AK 99613 Telephone Fax Email 907-246-3421 907-246-6602 iordankeeier®lakeandoen.com 1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT I GRANTS MANAGER Name Title Jordan Keeler Community Development Coordinator Mailing Address PO Box 495 King Salmon AK 99613 Telephone Fax Email 907-246-3421 907-246-6602 jordankeeler@lakeandpen.com 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your application will be rejected. 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or An independent power producer in accordance with 3 MC 107.695 (a) (1), or X A local government, or A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities); Yes 1.2.2 Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by or its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the No applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant's governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box ) Yes 1.2.3 As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and or follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant No agreement. Yes 1.2.4 If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached or grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the No application.) Yes 1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant or funds for the benefit of the general public. If no please describe the nature of the No project and who will be the primary beneficiaries. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 2 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application SECTION 2 -PROJECT SUMMARY This is intended to be no more than a 1-2 page overview of your project. 2.1 Project Title -(Provide a 4 to 5 word title for your project) Igiugig Wind Turbine Design 2.2 Project Location - ENERGY AUTHORITY Include the physical location of your project and name( s) of the community or communities that will benefit from your project in the subsections below. 2.2.1 Location of Project -Latitude and longitude, street address, or community name. Latitude and longitude coordinates may be obtained from Google Maps by finding you project's location on the map and then right clicking with the mouse and selecting 'What is here? The coordinates will be displayed in the Google search window above the map in a format as follows: 61.195676.-149.898663. If you would like assistance obtaining this information please contact AEA at 907-771-3031. The village of Igiugig located at the head of the Kvichak River approximately 210 miles SW of Anchorage 2.2.2 Community benefiting-Name{s) of the community or communities that will be the beneficiaries of the project. Village of Igiugig 2.3 PROJECT TYPE Put X in boxes as appropriate 2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type X Wind Biomass or Biofuels Hydro, including run of river Transmission of Renewable Energy Geothermal, including Heat Pumps ...... ·• Small Natural Gas Heat Recovery from existing sources Hydrokinetic Solar Storage of Renewable Other (Describe) 2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply) Pre-Construction Construction Reconnaissance X Design and Permitting Feasibility Construction and Commissioning Conceptual Design 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief one paragraph description of your proposed project. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 3 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application The Lake and Peninsula Borough seeks funding to design an approximate 1 OOkW wind turbine system in the village of Igiugig. The design of the turbine will include its integration into the new generation system recently installed to maximize output and efficiency. The wind study is not complete, but the 11-month data point for the feasibility report includes the winter months when winds and demand are highest. LPB will finish the grant with a design that can be put out to bid. The total for the project is $250,000 and LPB is offering a $45,000 match. 2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT Briefly discuss the financial and public benefits that will result from this project, (such as reduced fuel costs, lower energy costs, etc.) Electric rates in Igiugig are $.67/kWh before PCE and $.50 with PCE. The projected cost benefit with 80% funding from AEA is 1.26 and a savings of 10,000 gallons of diesel per year. Igiugig has several small business and other entities that are not eligible for PCE and the installation of a wind turbine, especially as fuel prices increase, lessen the burden of high electricity bills and will displace thousands of gallons of diesel per year. The displaced diesel also allows the community to stretch its fuel supply longer and not have to fly in even costlier fuel at the end of winter. 2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source of other contributions to the project. The project budget for the Igiugig wind tower design is $250,000. The Lake and Peninsula Borough has committed $45,000 to the project and the community is donating land and access to any land that is needed for completion of the project. The LPB is requesting $205,000 from the Alaska Energy Authority to complete the project. 2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY Include a summary of grant request and your project's total costs and benefits below. Grant Costs (Summary of funds requested) 2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $205,000 2.7.2 Cash match to be provided $45,000 2.7.3 In-kind match to be provided $0 2.7.4 Other grant applications not yet approved $0 2.7.5 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 through 2.7.3) $250,000 AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 4 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application Project Costs & Benefits ·-.:·. -~ llllllilll!C ENERGY AUTHORITY (Summary of total project costs including work to date and future cost estimates to get to a fully operational project) 2.7.6 Total Project Cost (Summary from Cost Worksheet $250,000 including estimates through construction) 2.7.7 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $0 2.7.8 Other Public Benefit (If you can calculate the benefit in $0 terms of dollars please provide that number here and explain how you calculated that number in your application (Section 5.) AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 5 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application SECTION 3 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application. 3.1 Project Manager Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include contact information, a resume and references for the manager( s ). If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management support. If the applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section. Project management will be the responsibility of the Lake and Peninsula Borough. Borough Manager Lamar Cotten will be the project manager. His resume is attached with this application. 3.2 Project Schedule and Milestones Please fill out form provided below. You may add additional rows as needed. Start End Milestones Tasks Date Date (List milestones based on phase and type of project. See Milestone list below.) Project Scoping and Contractor Craft and notice RFP. Select contractor 8/2013 Solicitation 8/2013 Permit application Apply for permits from all agencies 8/2013 8/2013 Land Use, Permitting, and Determine site placement and ownership 9/2013 environmental analysis 10/2013 Resolution of land use and right of Acquire rights to site and ROWs 9/2013 ways 10/23 Permit approvals Gain approval of all necessary permits 11/2013 11/2013 Final System Design Create wind turbine system to maximize 1/2014 economic benefit 4/2014 Engineers cost estimate Get final price to construct turbine 4/2014 5/2014 Updated economic and financial Complete final study with cost/benefit 6/2014 analysis 6/2014 Final business plan and operational End with a project that be put out for 6/2014 plan construction 6/2014 AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 6 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application 3.3 Project Resources Describe the personnel, contractors, accounting or bookkeeping personnel or firms, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an attachment to your application. Project will be accomplished using a contractor selected by RFP. Thus, the expertise will be determined in response to the RFP. Key members of Borough staff and Borough contractors will review the bids and monitor the progress of any contractor. 3.4 Project Communications Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status. Please provide an alternative contact person and their contact information. The contractor will be required to submit monthly reports to the LPB. Monthly reports will be included in the quarterly reports. 3.5 Project Risk Discuss potential problems and how you would address them. There is a low potentialfor risks in this project. Wind technology is commonplace across the state and the construction of wind turbines is now routine. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 7 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application SECTION 4 -PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS ·~c -':·· -ENERGY AUTHORITY • The level of information will vary according to phase(s) of the project you propose to undertake with grant funds. • If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. For pre-construction applications, describe the resource to the extent known. For design and permitting or construction projects, please provide feasibility documents, design documents, and permitting documents (if applicable) as attachments to this application. Wind is the sole alternative energy source for the village of Igiugig at the utility level. The LPB has commissioned a wind feasibility study that indicate 1.00 cost benefit-ratio without any AEA funding and 1.25 cost-benefit ratio with 80% funding. The attached study covers 11 months and a full study will submitted when the 12-month monitoring period is completed. 4.2 Existing Energy System 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation. The current power plant for the village-owned utility includes three 65kW diesel generators that have qne year of service. They exceed the AEA standard for PCE-efficiency and produce approximately 313,000 kWh per year and sell 272,000kW per year. 4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources. The current infrastructure is three 65kW generators that serve approximately 65 people throughout the year. The addition of wind power would require less generator use and significantly extend their lifespan. 4.2.3 Existing Energy Market Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy customers. The current market buys 272,000 kWh per year of diesel generated power. The project would not have any immediate impact on existing energy use. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 8 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application 4.3 Proposed System Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues. 4.3.1 System Design Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system: • A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location • Optimum installed capacity • Anticipated capacity factor • Anticipated annual generation • Anticipated barriers • Basic integration concept • Delivery methods The project calls for installation of a wind turbine rated to produce 1 OOkW during normal operations and will produce approximately 180,000 kW per year based on a 5.8 m/s wind speed. A full economic analysis will be available upon the completion of the wind study. Per discussions with AEA, LPB will submit this report when it becomes available. 4.3.2 Land Ownership Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues. Potential sites in Igiugig are on 14c3 lands and access/use will not be an issue. Site owners fully support the project. 4.3.3 Permits Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address outstanding permit issues. • List of applicable permits • Anticipated permitting timeline • Identify and discussion of potential barriers As the project is only for the design of a wind turbine system, there are no permits required. 4.3.4 Environmental Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be addressed: • Threatened or Endangered species • Habitat issues • Wetlands and other protected areas • Archaeological and historical resources • Land development constraints • Telecommunications interference • Aviation considerations • Visual, aesthetics impacts • Identify and discuss other potential barriers AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 9 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application None for this design project. 4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues (Total Estimated Costs and Projected Revenues) ENERGY AUTHORITY The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of their cost data. For example: Applicants records or analysis, industry standards, consultant or manufacturer's estimates. 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the project. Cost information should include the following: • Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase • Requested grant funding • Applicant matching funds -loans, capital contributions, in-kind • Identification of other funding sources • Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system • Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system The project total is anticipated to cost $250,000 and the Lake and Peninsula Borough is offering a $45,000 match. This figure comes from the Alaska Energy Authority. The construction phase is expected to cost about $1,000,000 and this figure is taken from the installed prices for 1 OOkW systems. 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the applicant. (Note: Operational costs are not eligible for grant funds however grantees are required to meet ongoing reporting requirements for the purpose of reporting impacts of projects on the communities they serve.) There is no O&M associated with the design of a wind turbine. O&M is projected to be about $40,000 per year for the wind/diesel system, with approximately $10,000 of the cost associated solely with a wind turbine. 4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale The power purchase/sale information should include the following: • Identification of potential power buyer( s )/customer( s) • Potential power purchase/sales price -at a minimum indicate a price range • Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project Igiugig has 65 residents and 63 customers (incl. commercial and gov't ) purchasing 272,000kW year. The current PCE rate of $.50kWh is not expected to change due to funding the PCE calculation formula, but the .67 non-PCE rate is likely to drop for customers not eligible or those who use over 500kWh per month. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 10 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application 4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet 'ENERGY AUTHORITY Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in evaluating the project. Please fill out the form provided below Renewable Energy Source The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis. Annual average resource availability. Approx 5.8 m/s wind resource Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel) Existing Energy Generation and Usage a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt1 grid, leave this section blank) i. Number of generators/boilers/other 3 ----------------------------------- ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 65kW ----------------------------------- iii. Generator/boilers/other type n/a ----------------------------------- iv. Age of generators/boilers/other n/a ----------------------------------- v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other n/a ----------------------------------- b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Annual O&M cost for labor 48,563 ------------------------------------------ ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor 168,777 ------------------------------------------ c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Electricity [kWh] 272,000 ---------------------------------------------------- ii. Fuel usage Diesel [gal] Other iii. Peak Load iv. Average Load v. Minimum Load vi. Efficiency vii. Future trends 28,563 0 120 kW 60 kW 30kW 12.1 kW per gallon Increasing population d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] ii. Electricity [kWh] AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 11 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application -= -='' ~-'ENERGY AUTHORITY iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] vi. Other Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage (Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels) a) Proposed renewable capacity (Wind, Hydro, Biomass, other) [kW or MMBtu/hr] 100 kW-type wind turbine, (ex. Northwind NP 100) b) Proposed annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable) i. Electricity [kWh] ii. Heat [MMBtu] Approx. 180,000 kWh c) Proposed annual fuel usage (fill in as applicable) a) b) 0 d) a) b) c) d) i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu] iii. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] iv. Other Project Cost Total capital cost of new system Development cost Annual fuel cost Project Benefits Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity 12,000 gallons ii. Heat 0 iii. Transportation 0 Current price of displaced fuel Other economic benefits Alaska public benefits Power Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for power purchase/sale 0 $1,265,000 $250,000 for design $1,000,000 for construction $0 $7.79/gallon $.03kWh for non-PCE rate payers 0 ---------------------------------------- AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 12 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application Project Analysis ·-: -[ tlBI1. > ENERGY AUTHORITY a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio Payback (years) Approx .. 98 w/o AEA funding, approx. 1.25 w AEA funding This will be included in the final analysis to be submitted 4.4.5 Proposed Biomass System Information Please address the following items, if know. (For Biomass Projects Only) • What woody biomass technology will be installed (cord wood, pellets, chips, briquettes, pucks). • Efficiency of the biomass technology. • Thermal or electric application. • Boiler efficiency. • Displaced fuel type and amount. • Estimated tons of wood pellets or chips (specify) to be used per year, and average moisture percentage. • Estimated cords of wood to be used per year, specify whether dry or green and the moisture percentage. • Ownership/Accessibility. Who owns the land and are their limitations and restrictions to accessing the biomass resource? • Inventory data. How much biomass is available on an annual basis and what types (species) are there, if known? AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 13 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application SECTION 5-PROJECT BENEFIT Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following: • Potential annual fuel displacement (gallons and dollars) over the lifetime of the evaluated renewable energy project • Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price, RCA tariff, or cost based rate) • Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits) • Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or programs that might be available) • Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project The current data suggests that the installation of a wind turbine will offset 12,000 gallons of diesel per year, resulting in $93,500 in avoided fuel costs per year. Even if the cost of fuel did not go up over the 20 year lifespan of the project, the lifetime total is $1,870,000 in avoided fuel costs. The wind turbine will produce approximately 190,000kWh per year with an anticipated production cost .03kWh below the current rate, and this translates into $5700 per year of 'revenue' for the utility. Alaska will gain three non-economic public benefits from this project. The main benefit is the displacement of diesel that results in cleaner air in the community. A second benefit is the reduced chance of fuel spillage because the need for shipments, and the chance for an accident, will be lessened. Alaskans also benefit from the knowledge and lessons learned from this on the operation small scale wind power in a remote community. SECTION 6-SUSTAINABILITY Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a minimum: • Proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered. • How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project • Identification of operational issues that could arise. • A description of operational costs including on-going support for any back-up or existing systems that may be require to continue operation • Commitment to reporting the savings and benefits The operator of the project will the Igiugig power utility, a healthy and well-managed utility that currently meets the power needs of the community. They will be responsible for M&O and will sign a 5-year contract with the eventual turbine contractor to ensure a smooth transition and identify any minor problems that may occur when integrating the turbine into the existing grid. The utility will continue to set aside funds each year for maintenance to cover the turbine and other operations, about $10,000 per year for the turbine alone. Savings and benefits will be reported and non-PCE consumers will be made aware of the savings. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 14 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application ~~ ENERGY AUTHORITY SECTION 7 -READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS Discuss what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed with work once your grant is approved. Tell us what you may have already accomplished on the project to date and identify other grants that may have been previously awarded for this project and the degree you have been able to meet the requirements of previous grants. Borough staff and consultants are able to begin immediately upon award with this project. Permitting and field work planning activities and vendor solicitations could begin immediately, and we anticipate beginning the procurement process immediately after selecting a contractor, assuming approval is granted in July of 2013. This is the first work to be done on this project, but the team members have past experience meeting the requirements of other grants and projects. SECTION 8-LOCAL SUPORT Discuss what local support or possible opposition there may be regarding your project. Include letters of support from the community that would benefit from this project. This project was requested by the Village oflgiugig and has full community support. The LPB Assembly also approved funds to spend on this project. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 15 of 19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application SECTION 9 -GRANT BUDGET )~ ~ tllllli["; ENERGY AUTHORITY Tell us how much you want in grant funds Include any investments to date and funding sources, how much is being requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an applicant. Provide a narrative summary regarding funding sources and your financial commitment to the project. Applications should include a separate worksheet for each project phase that was identified in section 2.3.2 of this application, (Reconnaissance, Feasibility, Conceptual Design, Design and Permitting, and Construction). Please use the tables provided below to detail your proposed project's budget. Be sure to use one table for each phase of your project. Source of Matching Anticipated Grantee Funds: RE-Fund Cash/In-Milestone or Task Completion Grant Funds Matching kind/Federal TOTALS Date Funds Grants/Other State Grants/Otper (List milestones based on phase and type of project. $ $ $ See Milestone list below. ) Project Scoping and 8/2013 $ 15,000 $5,000 $20,000 Contractor Solicitation Permit application 8/2013 $10,000 $0 $30,000 Land Use, Permitting, and 9/2013 $10,000 $0 $40,000 environmental analysis Resolution of land use and 8/2013 $10,000 $0 $50,000 riQht of ways Permit approvals 11/2013 $ 15,000 $0 $65,000 Final System Design 4/2014 $100,000 $30,000 $195,000 EnQineers cost estimate 5/2014 $25,000 $ $220,000 Updated economic and 6/2014 $10,000 $5,000 $235,000 financial analysis Final business plan and 6/2014 $10,000 $5,000 $250,000 operational plan TOTALS $205,000 $45,000 $250.000 Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $ $5,000 $5,000 Travel & Per Diem $ $ $ Equipment $ $ $ Materials & Supplies $ $ $ Contractual Services $205,000 $40,000 $245,000 Construction Services $ $ $ Other $ $ $ TOTALS $ $ $250,000 AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 16 of 19 7/3//2012 ·~·· ~r Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant A lication ~-· ENERGY AUTHORITY p ro1ec t M"l t 1 es ones th t h ld b dd a s ou ea resse d. B d t P In u 1ae roposa Reconnaissance Feasibility Design and Construction Permittin.g. 1. Project scoping and 1. Project scoping 1. Project scoping 1. Confirmation that all contractor solicitation. and contractor and contractor design and feasibility 2. Resource solicitation. solicitation for requirements are planning and complete. identification and 2. Detailed energy design analysis resource analysis 2. Completion of bid 3. Land use, permitting, 3. Identification of 2. Permit documents applications (as and environmental land and regulatory needed) 3. Contractor/vendor analysis issues, selection and award 4. Preliminary design 4. Permitting and 3. Final 4. Construction Phases environmental analysis and cost environmental assessment and - 5. Cost of energy and analysis mitigation plans Each project will have market analysis 5. Detailed analysis of (as needed) unique construction 6. Simple economic existing and future 4. Resolution of phases, limitations, analysis energy costs and land use, right of and schedule markets constraints which 7. Final report and way issues should be identified 6. Assessment of recommendations alternatives 5. Permit approvals by the grantee 7. Conceptual design 6. Final system 5. Integration and analysis and cost design testing estimate 7. Engineers cost 6. Decommissioning old 8. Detailed economic estimate systems and financial 8. Updated 7. Final Acceptance, analysis economic and Commissioning and 9, Conceptual financial analysis Start-up business and 9. Negotiated 8. Operations Reporting operations plans · power sales 10. Final report and agreements with recommendations approved rates 10. Final business and operational plan AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 17 of 19 7/3//2012 llilllf. ~· Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application ~: ' ENERGY AUTHORITY SECTION 10-AUTHORIZED SIGNERS FORM Community/Grantee Name: Lake and Peninsula Borough Regular Election is held: October I Date: 9/20/2012 Authorized Grant Signer(s): Printed Name Title Term Lamar J. Cotten Borough Manager n/a I authorize the above person(s) to sign Grant Documents: (Highest ranking organization/community/municipal official) Printed Name Title Term Glen R. Alsworth Borough Mayor 11/2012 Grantee Contact Information: Mailing Address: Signature Signature PO Box 495 King Salmon, AK 99613 Phone Number: 907-246-3421 Fax Number: 907-246-6602 E-mail Address: manaQer@lakeandpen.com Federal Tax ID #: # 92-0128922 Please submit an updated form whenever there is a change to the above information. AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page18of19 7/3//2012 Renewable Energy Fund Round 6 Grant Application ·Ei{ ~· • ENERGY AUTHORITY SECTION 11-ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WITH YOUR APPLICATION: A. Contact information, resumes of Applicant's Project Manager, key staff, partners, consultants, and suppliers per application form Section 3.1 and 3.4. Applicants are asked to separate resumes submitted with applications, if the individuals do not want their resumes posted. B. Letters demonstrating local support per application form Section 8. C. An electronic version of the entire application on CD per RFA Section 1.7. D. Governing Body Resolution or other formal action taken by the applicant's governing body or management per RFA Section 1.4 that: Commits the organization to provide the matching resources for project at the match amounts indicated in the application. Authorizes the individual who signs the application has the authority to commit the organization to the obligations under the grant. Provides as point of contact to represent the applicant for purposes of this application. Certifies the applicant is in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local, laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations. E. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that this application for a renewable energy grant is truthful and correct, and that the applicant is in compliance with, and will continue to comply with, all federal and state laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations and that they can indeed commit the entity to these obligations. Print Name Lamar J. Cotten Signature Title Borough Manager Date September 13, 2012 AEA 13-006 Grant Application Page 19 of 19 7/3//2012 3. Determination of Igiugig Wind Power Project & Levelock & Egegik Mr. Cotten explained that Igiugig, Egegik and Levelock wind projects are good potential candidates for upcoming AEA grants. Both Egegik and Levelock have requested the Borough assistance with these projects. Mr. Cotten proposed the Borough help promote the Egegik and Levelock projects by assisting with writing the grants and project management. He said that the Borough would also help Igiugig if they request the help. Mayor Alsworth emphasized that the Assembly is willing to assist every village with their goals and to help them work toward a better quality of life, but only as requested. The Assembly will only act in ways that the community wants. Assembly member Olsen said that energy projects are important and would like to make them a priority. Consensus of the Assembly was to support and assist Egegik and Levelock with grant applications to AEA and project management of wind projects. The meeting was recessed by consensus at 10:45 am The meeting was reconvened by consensus at 10:53 am J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Borough Capital Project Report a. Kokhanok Wind Project Mr. Cotten asked Nathan Hill to speak about the Kokhanok Wind Project. Mr. Hill reported that the diesel generators were tumed off this last month as a test of the grid forming inverter. The village was able to run off the wind and battery only for a few hours. The diesel generators run idle only when the wind is blowing. It means they are using less diesel, but the goal is to be able to run without the generators at times. Bob Loeffler asked if the community considers the turbines a good thing. Mr. Hill said that while many people are under the impression that their energy bill should be reduced, there is pride in the turbines and the community realizes the system is unique. b. Wind Monitoring in Igiugig TheMayor noted that the preliminary analysis was positive. Mr. Cotten said that if the village of Igiugig chooses to move forward, the Borough can help submit the grant for funding. c. Wood Boiler Contracts The wood boiler in Igiugig is on site, but not installed. The contractors anticipate completion before winter. The GARN wood boiler in Kokhanok will be completed in October. Mr. Cotten added that it is the villages' responsibility to arrange for and purchase the wood for the boilers. Assembly Minutes August 21, 2012 Knight Piesold CONSULTING September 11, 2012 Lake and Peninsula Borough 429 L Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attn: Lamar Cotten Subject: Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Current Status Including Eleven Months of Data Dear Lamar: Knight Piesold and Co. 1999 Broadway, Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80202-5706 USA Telephone: (303) 629-8788 Facsimile: (303) 629-8789 E-mail: denver@knightpiesold.com KP Project No.: DV1 03-00240 /06 KP Doc. No.: DV-12-0970 The contents of this letter detail the status of the Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment to date. 1.0 LNTRQJ2!:JCJION In September 2011, a meteorological measurement tower (met-tower) was installed in the village of Igiugig in order to collect data for a detailed wind resource assessment. The tower began data collection on October 1, 2011. On October 13, 2011, a Met-Tower Installation Report [1] was issued containing the details and outcomes of the installation. The Installation Report is attached for reference. To date, 11 full months of data have been collected from the met-tower. Data is received once per month with the most recent receipt on September 4, 2012, containing data through August 31, 2012. This letter contains preliminary outcomes of the wind resource assessment based solely on the raw data collected to date. A complete wind resource assessment requires 1 full year of data collection which has not yet been realized. A full analysis of the data including merging of the two anemometers and long- term correlation of the data has not been completed but will be completed once 12 full months of data have been collected. 2.0 ~lND~l6 TI~ILQl)~!:)MI\I]AR}:: A summary of the main statistics from the measurements made to date is listed below. The wind statistics are generated from raw data recorded by one anemometer near the top of the met-tower, at 33m height above ground. • Average wind speed from 11 months of data, 5.8 m/s (13 mph) • Average wind direction from 11 months of data, 162° (SSE) • Data recover rate, 97.9 percent The results of the wind statistics are shown in the interim report [2] generated by WindPRO® software. The interim report for data through August 2012 is attached for reference. 3. 0 §JJ M 1\/lAR'COEJ;.Q~QNOI\I]~Q~~~~ULl~. Using the raw data collected to date, it is possible to estimate annual energy production of a wind turbine installed at the location of the met-tower. These estimates are solely based on the raw data collected there over the past 11 months, and do not reflect a full analysis and detailed estimation based on long term data correlation as that will only be done once a full year of data has been collected. Igiugig has a current population of 69 with a strategic planning initiative by the village council to grow the population to 100 and to expand business and facilities. Economics of a potential wind turbine installation Knight Piesold CONSULTING Lamar Cotten September 11, 2012 Lake and Peninsula Borough are dictated in part by the demand for electricity which currently averages about 955 kWh per month. Electricity is currently generated by diesel fuel with waste heat recovery. The Northern Power 100 Arctic (NP 1 00) wind turbine is the most commonly installed wind turbine in rural Alaska. A rough estimate of the cost to install this wind turbine in Igiugig is about $1,265,000. Economic results of a potential installation of a NP 100 were calculated from the current data for three different scenarios. 1. Current scenario -cost of diesel at US$7. 79 per gallon, a population of 69, and average wind speed of 5.8 m/s. 2. Cost of diesel at US$8.50 per gallon, population of 69, and average wind speed of 6.2 m/s. This scenario assumes a more suitable wind turbine site can be found with higher wind speeds. It also assumes a modest increase in the cost of diesel fuel by the time the system is operational. 3. Cost of diesel at US$7.79, population of 100, and average wind speed of 5.8 m/s. This scenario assumes the diesel cost remains the same, wind speed remains the same, but electricity demand increases by about 40 percent. The actual discount rate assumed is 2.9 percent, with a nominal interest rate and inflation rate of 5 and 2 percent, respectively. The project lifetime is assumed to be 20 years. It is assumed that an electric boiler would be paired with the existing waste heat recovery system. The electric boiler would be governed by a dedicated secondary load controller to utilize excess wind energy coming from the turbine when the electric load is low, thus allowing a further reduction in fuel costs for heating. The cost of diesel is assumed to escalate at the inflation rate of 2 percent, which is likely a very conservative estimate since diesel prices have increased at a significantly higher rate in the past. A fixed system operation and maintenance (O&M) cost of US$40,500 per year was used for both the combined wind power/diesel system and the current system. This is an average salary for a maintenance mechanic at the power house. US$2.32 per operational hour is the additional rate assumed for the O&M of diesel generators based on data provided at Port Alsworth and adjusted for the more modern power house in Igiugig. For the wind system, an US$9,940/year O&M cost per installed turbine is assumed; this includes salary amounting to 1 day/month for a local mechanic plus 2 days every 3 months for a specialized mechanic from Anchorage and airfares. The software program HOMER© [3] was employed to simulate the economic performance of the wind/diesel system. The economic results from each scenario are shown below. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Current Energy Cost US$0.67 I kWh US$0.72/ kWh US$0.65 I kWh Energy Cost w/ Turbine US$0.68/ kWh US$0.68/ kWh US$0.62/ kWh Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.99 1.04 1.03 Diesel Savings Per Year 11,000 gal 12,000 gal 13,000 gal Under all scenarios, the use of state funds to offset the capital cost of the wind turbine system would drive up the benefit/cost ratio. 4.0 SUMJVI~I3Y A met-tower installed in the village of Igiugig in September 2011 has collected 11 complete months of data. That raw data has been used to estimate the economic benefits of installing a NP 1 00 wind turbine to offset the use of diesel fuel to generate electricity. The village of Igiugig is a good candidate for installation of renewable electricity generation sources due to its strong village organization including a planning goal to increase population, commitment of the people to renewable energy, and its newly updated power house which will ease integration of 2 Knight Piesold CONSULTING Lamar Cotten September 11, 2012 Lake and Peninsula Borough renewables into the system. Installation of a NP 100 wind turbine would give a benefiUcost ratio of 0.99 in the current scenario. Under other scenarios where the population increases, cost of diesel increases, or a higher wind speed site can be found closer to the lake, the benefiUcost ratio increases. Under any scenario, the installation of a NP 100 would offset the use of at least 11,000 gallons of diesel per year. 5.0 lJMlJ ATlQNs_ OfJ28I8 The data used to generate the above results is raw data collected from one anemometer for 11 months. Typically, a full year of data from several anemometers is selectively merged together and correlated with a long-term reference data set from a nearby airport. Eleven months of data generally gives a good indication of the annual average wind speed one can expect at the site. However, without the full analysis being performed there is potential for a high margin of error in the predicted average wind speed. Full analysis has not been completed on this data set, but will be done in October 2012 once a full year of data has been collected. The results of this full analysis will be detailed in a Final Report expected to be issued in late October 2012. [1] Knight Piesold report, Lake and Peninsula Borough Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Met- Tower Installation Report, dated October 13, 2011. [2] Knight Piesold report, Lake and Peninsula Borough Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Interim Data Report, dated September 10, 2012. [3] U.S. Department of Energy, 2005, HOMER Version 2. 1, Micropower Optimization Software Model, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. Sincerely, Knight Piesold and Co. Christopher Mertes, EIT Mechanical Engineer Enclosures: Met-Tower Installation Report, dated October 13, 2011 Igiugig Interim Report, August 2012 M:\Denver\Projects\ 1 03\00240.06\Deliverabtes\Letters\Status _11 month_forAEAapp\T ext. do ex 3 Knight Piesold CONSULTING Enclosure 1 Met-Tower Installation Report, dated October 13, 2011 Rev. No. A Lake and Peninsula Borough Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Met-Tower Installation Report Date 10/13/2011 October 13, 2010 prepared for: Lamar Cotten Lake and Peninsula Borough 429 L Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Telephone: (907) 301-8737 Facsimile: (907) 246-6602 prepared by: Knight Piesold and Co. 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1 000 Denver, Colorado 80203-1512 USA Telephone: (303) 629-8788 Facsimile: (303) 629-8789 E-mail: denver@knightpiesold.com KP Project No. 103-00240.06 Description Knight Piesold Issued for Review Rick R. Damiani Client Lamar Cotten ONSULTING Lake and Peninsula Borough Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Met-Tower Installation Report Executive Summary A 34-meter (m) (111.5 feet) meteorological tower (met-tower) was transported to and installed at Igiugig, Alaska. A preliminary study of the wind flow conditions suggested a total of 7 potential locations for the tower. Knight Piesold staff filed a request with the FAA for site clearance. A site survey was executed at all planned locations and additional site was investigated, which did not require FAA clearance. The survey conclusions identified two effective potential candidate sites. The final location for the met-tower was determined based on conservative safety assumptions on air navigational safety, land ownership, soil conditions, and expected wind resource. In the future, there is a possibility of installing turbines closer to the village power house or school with significant savings once FAA approval of other sites is received. A few challenges complicated the project, namely associated with transportation, logistics, and soil conditions. The tower was shipped by air from Port Alsworth where it had been previously decommissioned. A few components had to be fabricated or purchased just prior to installation to aid in the anchoring and instrumentation refurbishing. Soil conditions made it impossible to utilize regular screw-in anchors and some engineering went into fabrication of ad-hoc anchors. Before Knight Piesold and Co. (Knight Piesold) staff left the site, they were able to collect 1 days" worth of data from the tower and necessary adjustments to the tower hardware were made. The data shows that all the instruments and data-logger are operational and in optimal status. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A ES-1 Lake and Peninsula Borough Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Met-Tower Installation Report Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................ ES-1 Section 1.0 -Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Limitations and Disclaimer ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Contributors and Contacts ............................................................................................................... 2 Section 2.0 -Preliminary Flow Modeling ..................................................................... 3 2.1 Wind Flow Modeling ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Potential Sites for Met-Tower Installation ........................................................................................ 5 Section 3.0 -Site Survey and Installation Activities ................................................... 9 3.1 Site Survey, Potential Tower Sites, and Pre-installation Activities (4 Days) .................................... 9 3.2 Site Preparation and Erection of the Met-Tower (4 Days) ............................................................. 11 Section 4.0-Conclusions ........................................................................................... 14 4.1 Concluding Remarks and Future Activities .................................................................................... 14 Section 5.0 -Recommendations ................................................................................ 15 Section 6.0 -Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................. 16 Table 1. Potential Tower Sites' Coordinates. Table 2. Instrumentation parameters. Tables Figures 5 12 Figure 1. AWOS Station (IGG) ...................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Filled contours of wind speed at 30 m above ground level (agl) as derived from a preliminary numerical model overlaid onto topographical contour lines in the geographical area surrounding Igiugig. Topography, surface roughness and other factors affect the wind flow. This calculation employs data from the local AWOA station to deduce a first approximation wind flow distribution at Igiugig. Black circles represent FAA hazard distance from the runway (red circles 5,000 ft and black circles have 10,000 ft radii) .......................................................................................... 4 Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A i Figure 3. Aerial view of Igiugig with potential site locations denoted by red marks. The black cross identifies the final install location .................................................................................................. 6 Figure 4. As in Figure 3, with a satellite low-resolution image in the background ....................................... 7 Figure 5. Wind speed, energy, and direction distribution at ,Site 04" ............................................................ 8 Figure 6. Painting the tower. ........................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 7. View of typical surface conditions around the town of Igiugig (and tower after erection in the foreground) ................................................................................................................................. 1 0 Figure 8. Dug anchor trench ....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 9. Buried anchor ............................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 10. View of the tower fully erected ................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A Appendices Preliminary Wind Analysis at Potential Tower Sites Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A ii Lake and Peninsula Borough Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment Met-Tower Installation Report Section 1.0 -Introduction 1 . 1 J2"gQsmQyJ1Q Knight Piesold and Co. (Knight Piesold) was contracted to decommission the meteorological tower (met- tower) previously erected at Port Alsworth, and to ship it and re-install it in the town of Igiugig, Alaska. The tower siting and installation is part of the wind resource assessment (WRA) to be conducted at Igiugig, Alaska. The WRA is a fundamental portion of the project number 103-00240.06. This report highlights the main aspects involved in the preliminary wind study around Igiugig and the installation steps. It is also a status report on activities carried out by Knight Piesold for Lake and Peninsula Borough (LPB). 1.2 IJIJ1it_gJiQIJ~£!JlQ~Discl(!i!Jl~I This report titled Igiugig Wind Resource Assessment has been prepared by Knight Piesold for the exclusive use of LPB. No other party is an intended beneficiary of this report or the information, opinions, and conclusions contained herein. Any use by any party other than LPB of any of the information, opinions, or conclusions is the sole responsibility of said party. The use of this report shall be at the sole risk of the user regardless of any fault or negligence of LBP or Knight Piesold. The information and analyses contained herein have been completed to a level of detail commensurate with the objectives of the assignment and in light of the information made available to Knight Piesold at the time of preparation. This report and its supporting documentation have been reviewed and/or checked for conformance with industry-accepted norms. Calculations and computer simulations have been checked and verified for reasonableness, and the content of the report has been reviewed for completeness, accuracy, and appropriateness of conclusions. To the best of the information and belief of Knight Piesold, the information presented in this report is accurate to within the limitations specified herein. This report is Knight Piesold pdf file: Met-Tower_lnstafiReport_lgiugig.pdf. Any reproductions or modifications of this report are uncontrolled and may not be the most recent revision. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 1 1 . 3 Q.ontribl!t9J§~~n~LQg~nJ~~1§ This report was prepared, reviewed, and approved by the undersigned. Prepared by: Prepared by: Approved by: Rick Damiani, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Project Manager Chris Mertes Engineer/Scientist Norman Bishop, P.E., M.B.A Senior VP Hydroelectric and Renewable Energy G:\ 1 03\00240. 06\Deliverables\Reports Weekly Monthly\MetT ower _I nstaiiReport _lgiugig.doc Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 2 Section 2.0 -Preliminary Flow Modeling 2.1 ~~FIQ,~~,MQ9~ A numerical simulation was employed to look at wind flow trends around the town of Igiugig, Alaska. This simulation was necessary to identify candidate sites for the met-tower (and potentially the wind turbine to be deployed in the future) based on terrain and wind characteristics. The following extensive data was collected: USGS topographical maps, Digital Elevation Maps (DEMs), and satellite imagery. Additionally, surface roughness data was acquired based on satellite MODIS mission and analysis of aerial imageries and maps. Wind data was purchased for the automatic weather observation station (AWOS) station at Igiugig (IGG, see Figure 1 ). As a result, a local climatology was calculated, and this was then numerically transferred to the site of interest. Figure 1. AWOS Station (IGG). The acquired data was used in a WAsP® calculation to evaluate the wind speed trends over the topography about Igiugig. The results are shown in Figure 2. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 3 Figure 2. Filled contours of wind speed at 30 m above ground level (agl) as derived from a preliminary numerical model overlaid onto topographical contour lines in the geographical area surrounding Igiugig. Topography, surface roughness and other factors affect the wind flow. This calculation employs data from the local AWOA station to deduce a first approximation wind flow distribution at Igiugig. Black circles represent FAA hazard distance from the runway (red circles 5,000 ft and black circles have 10,000 ft radii). Note that the wind speed values should be used as qualitative only, due to large uncertainties in the numerical calculations using wind data from about 30 ft above ground and with intermittent sampling frequency. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 4 2. 2 PoJgnt@L§JJg§Jor:JY,'!gt-Ti>Jt:terJn~ta1Lt!tiQn The accumulated results led to the identification of (7) seven candidate sites for tower installation. They can be seen as ,x: marks in Figure 2-Figure 3, and their coordinates are given in Table 1 below. Table 1. Potential Tower Sites' Coordinates. Tower Site Longitude (W) Latitude (N) Z (m) t= 01 -155°54' 14.898" 59°18' 58.968" 28.7 02 -155°54' 30.606" 59°19' 11.688" 26.8 03 -155°53' 58.53" 59°19' 17.088" 24.4 04 -155°54' 27.912" 59°18' 34.254" 32.8 05 -155°53' 25.14" 59°19' 1 0.368" 23.9 06 -155°53' 39.948" 59°19' 25.974" 18.4 07 -155°50' 31.902" 59°19' 37.578" 34.3 The seven locations were further analyzed to look at wind directional distribution. In most cases the predominant wind direction appears to be easterly and aligned with the runway at Igiugig. An example of this wind rose is provided for ,Site 04" in Figure 5. A geological map was also acquired to narrow down the number of potential installation sites based on soil conditions. However, the information in the USGS map was not adequate to discard any of the initially selected sites. An application was filed with the FAA to assess any potential hazard to air navigation for all tower sites. FAA responded clearing most of the sites with the exception of Site 06 closest to the airstrip. Note that the best locations for wind resource (Figure 2) appear to be along the Iliamna Lake shore, where native allotment land would likely prevent the installation of a village turbine however. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 5 Figure 3. Aerial view of Igiugig with potential site locations denoted by red marks. The black cross identifies the final install location. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 6 Figure 4. As in Figure 3, with a satellite low-resolution image in the background. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 7 Energy Rose (kV\4'1im'lyear) w Wind speed {mls] !Vrean wind (mls) w Figure 5. Wind speed, energy, and direction distribution at 'Site 04'. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 8 Section 3.0 -Site Survey and Installation Activities 3.1 Sit~L§~urv~v~J:~~~t?Jllial TQyyer Sit?~~!JcLEr§:ln~t~llctUor:L6~gJlvJU§3Li~J2~gy§,l Staff members from Knight Piesold traveled to Port Alsworth, Alaska carrying essential tools for decommissioning and re-installation of the local meteorological tower, erected the year before. At the same time, new residual hardware, wiring, anchors, and instruments were acquired and shipped air- freight to Igiugig. The tower and instrumentation underwent a rigorous inventory check and functionality test. The top portion of the tower was then re-painted to FAA specs similarly to the tower in Figure 6. Figure 6·. Painting the tower. A GPS-guided survey of most of the locations was executed during the first day of the site visit. Some of the candidate sites were inaccessible due to the absence of roads or trails, or resulted in unstable soils. Site 04 and Site 01 were the remaining candidates, but proximity to Native Allotment land prevented the installation at Site 01. It was then decided to relocate Site 04 to within the near-by landfill (see also Figure 2, Figure 4, and Figure 7). Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 9 Figure 7. View of typical surface conditions around the town of Igiugig (and tower after erection in the foreground). The village has only used a part of the fenced area and the remainder was relatively clear, flat, and just large enough to lay the tower out. Approval from the village council and landfill operator to use the space was received prior to any of the erection process, which also required the relocation of some junk vehicles. The site is representative of the conditions farther inland from the Lake Iliamna shore, but it should still be located in optimal wind resource from initial indications. Given the presence of local grid terminals, the distance from the powerhouse and village and school buildings would make it only slightly more complicated to implement an energy diverting heating system. The site is out of the way of aviation traffic patterns, and met FAA requirements for no hazard to air traffic. Knight Piesold dug several test holes to verify soil conditions at the site. The soil was fairly uniform silty clay with very small rocks mixed in, but water table was relatively high. For safety reasons, we opted for the use of dead-man anchors. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 10 3.2 ~it~_Pl§?.arajif>n a!l<LI;L~~9tion qH!l~J~~t:I9WeL(~PC!YS} The final site was selected at: -155°54"34.04", 59°18'29.21", elevation 38m (126ft). Based on similar project conditions and conducted tests, dead-man anchors were deemed appropriate. Dead man anchors were comprised of salvaged materials found in the village. They consisted of used heavy steel plates slipped over the anchors and placed into the trenches. Finally large rocks where placed on top and clay soil was replaced and compacted. Initial trenches were dug using a rented back- hoe. The winch anchor was further secured with a block of concrete. Figure 8 and Figure 9 show anchor trenches similar to those dug at Igiugig. Figure 8. Dug anchor trench. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 11 Figure 9. Buried anchor. Once the anchors were set in place, the tower was assembled on the ground and all the necessary hardware for tower and gin pole prepared. The tower base was secured to the ground through several copper ground-rods; the winch was anchored down as well, and connected via the hardware that we had to procure ahead of time. The next step consisted of erecting the tower. Knight Piesold erected the tower in about 8 hours on a day when gusts allowed for safe operations. We first conducted a test erection to verify all the guy cables were set properly and that all was a "GO". Then we installed instrumentation and ran signal wires down the tower. The instrumentation is mounted according to the parameters as shown in Table 2. Table 2. Instrumentation parameters. Instrument Channel Name Height [m AGL] Orientation Cup Anemometer A1 34 135° Cup Anemometer A2 34 45° Cup Anemometer 8 21 135° Wind Vane A 33 135° (offset=+135°) Temperature Probe T 3 oo The cup anemometers" booms were oriented to minimize the tower shadow (aerodynamic effects due to the tower on the measurements), and according to the preliminary study discussed in Section 2.1 and the wind direction and energy distribution rose as given in Figure 5. The cup anemometers were therefore oriented at 45° from the expected predominant E-W wind direction. Finally we proceeded to the final erection. On the following day, we checked back on the towers and guy wires making sure everything was in order and performing adjustment to tension and hardware as needed. We also monitored the data for about 24 hours after erection to verify the instrumentation and logger were working as expected. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 12 Official valid data collection started on Oct. 2, 2011 at 15:00 AST. Figure 10. View of the tower fully erected. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 13 Section 4.0 -Conclusions 4.1 _9oncluding Remarks anctFuture ~ctivities A successful tower installation has been documented in this report, which includes a summary of the activities of wind flow modeling (pre-install), and site surveying. Data will be now collected by the logger and analyzed on a monthly basis. Knight Piesold expects to receive one email with the raw data from the logger once a month during the first week of each month, starting November 2010. Instruction on collecting data was left with Mrs. Alexanna Salmon prior to our crew's departure. The Lake and Peninsula Borough may want to follow up with the Village Council to ensure that the data is consistently being collected. At the end of one year"s worth of data collection, Knight Piesold will execute a more in-depth analysis of the wind resource at Igiugig, and perform an economic feasibility assessment. A special thanks to Alexanna for their help with trip logistics and shipping. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 14 Section 5.0 -Recommendations Knight Piesold always recommends a site visit after a tower installation. This, however, is not included in the current budget. While we cannot guarantee absence of detrimental effects to the tower due to weather and other natural sources, we do not have reasons to assume effects that may slightly compromise the accuracy of the data, or undermine the stability and soundness of the tower. Knight Piesold recommends that our personnel visit the site in the spring to verify everything is still functional and safe, and execute needed adjustments in case. Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 15 AGL AEA AWOS Knight Piesold LPB msl WRA Section 6.0 -Abbreviations and Acronyms above ground level Alaska Energy Authority automatic weather observation station Knight Piesold and Co. Lake Peninsula and Borough mean sea level wind resource assessment Met-Tower Installation Report, Rev A 16 Appendix A Preliminary Wind Analysis at Potential Tower Site 04 IGIUGIG WAsP interface -Main Result Ca.lc~lation: Site 04 WAsP calc Name Site Data for WASP calc Site Coordinates UTM WGS 84 Zone: 5 East: 334,479 North: 6,578,131 Air density calculation mode Individual per WTG Result for WfG at hub altitude 1.272 kgim' Air density relative to standard 103.9% Hub altitude above sea level (asl) 62.8 m Annual mean temperature at hub alt. 0.4 oc Pressure at WTGs 999.2 hPa . Calculation is based on "Site Data for WASP calc", using WAsP (WAsP 6-9 for Windows RVEA0011 1, 0, 0, 13) to convert the wind statistics and the • terrain classification to a site specific wind speed distribution. Using the selected power curve, the expected annual energy production is 1 calculated. 'Wind statistics US PAIG Met Data (Matrix MCP using Iliamna MET Data).wws ;wAsP version WAsP 6-9 for Windows RVEA0011 1, 0, 0, 13 !Calculation Results • Key results for height 30.0 m above ground level @l Site Data Pnnted/Page 1011212011 9:28AM I 1 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1000 US-DENVER, CO 80203 +1 303 629 8788 Rick Damiani I rdamiani@knightpiesold.com Calculated 10/1212011 9:25 AM12.7.486 Scale 1:25,000 · Wind energy: 2,058 kWh/m2 ; Mean wind speed: 5.5 m/s; Equivalent roughness: 1.0 Calculated Annual Energy WTG type Valid Manufact. Type-generator Power, Rotor Hub No rated diameter height [kW] NORTHWIND 100 Arctic-100 100 [m] 21.0 [m] 30.0 Power curve Creator Name Annual Energy Result Result-10.0% [MWh] USER Arctic 100 194.1 [MWh] 175 Mean Capacity wind factor speed [m/s] [%] 5.52 22.1 ~IGIUGIG 10/12/2011 9:28AM I 2 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1 000 US-DENVER, CO 80203 +1 303 629 8788 Rick Damiani I rdamiani@knightpiesold.com Calculated· 10/12/201.1 9:25 AM/2 .. 7486 WAsP interface -Production Analysis 1 Calculation: Site 04 WAsP calcWTG: NORTHWIN() 100 Arctic 60W1100 21.0 ®n, Hub height: 30.0 m, Air density: 1.272 kg/m 3 uirectionai .. Analysis Sector ON 1 NNE 2 ENE 3E 4 ESE 5 SSE 68 7 ssw 8WSW 9W 10WNW 11 NNW Total Roughness based energy [MWh] 5.4 5.2 29.9 72.5 11.3 2.3 6.5 26.9 12.8 2.9 5.1 9.8 190.6 +Increase due to hills [MWh] 0.3 0.5 1.7 -0.7 -0.2 0.1 0.3 14 0.4 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 3.5 Resulting energy rMWhD UD ClC LLlO LliO etc nt---:1 U_l[l [J[J 1:1 00 ITIJCJ Specific energy [kWh/m2 ] 560 SpecifiC energy [kWh/kW] 1,941 Increase due to hills [%] 4.7 10.5 5.7 -0.9 -1.9 4.7 4.5 5.4 2.8 -1.4 -3.4 -0.9 1.83 Directional Distribution [%] 2.9 3.0 16.3 37.0 5.7 1.2 3.5 14.6 6.8 1.5 2.5 5.0 100.0 Utilirntion [%] 34.9 35.7 30.9 22.1 20.2 31.1 33.6 334 35.9 36.0 36.1 34.2 27.2 Operational [Hours/year] 240 346 1,082 1,265 238 133 424 1,188 744 292 299 368 6,620 Dull Load Equivalent [Hours/year] 56 57 315 718 111 24 68 283 132 28 49 98 1,941 A-parameter [m/s] 5.8 5.0 6.2 8.9 7.8 4.7 4.7 5.7 5.2 4.3 5.0 6.1 6.2 I Mean wind speed [m/s] 5.1 4.4 5.5 7.9 7.0 4.3 4.2 5.1 4.6 3.8 4.5 5.4 5.5 k-parameter 2.24 209 1.95 2.12 1.69 1.56 1.73 2.03 2.20 2.31 2.19 2.26 1.76 Clrequency [%] 3.6 5.2 16.3 19.1 3.6 2.0 64 17.9 11.2 44 4.5 5.6 100.0 Power density [W/m 2] 235 'Z w "" w w fu if} s s s ~ ~ z iE <h z "' {/) "' (/': ~ z (•) :; Sector j Cl HIll Ill ObStacle! IGIUGIG 10/12/2011 9:28AM I 3 L1censeduser Knight Piesold Ltd 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1000 US-DENVER, CO 80203 +1 303 629 8788 Rick Damiani I rdamiani@knightpiesold.com Calculated 10/12/2011 9:25 AM/2.7.486 WAsP interface -Power Curve Analysis Calculation: Site 04 WAsP calcWTG: NORTHWIND 100 Arctic 60Hfl100 21.0 riDl'Arctic 100, Hub height 30.0 m Name: Source: Arctic 100 SpecSheet Source/Date Created by 10/12/2009 USER Created Edited 10/12/2009 10/12/2009 Stop wind speed Power control CT curve type [m/s] 25.0 Stall Standard stall HP curve comparison-Note: cor standard air density and wei bull k parameter ll 2 Vmean [m/s] 5 6 7 8 9 10 HP value [MWh] 146 222 306 379 427 493 NORTHWIND 100 Arctic 60H0100 21.0 tO !'Arctic 100 [MWh] 147 222 298 369 431 482 Check value [%] 0 0 2 3 -1 2 The table shows comparison between annuar energy production calculated on basis of simplified "HP-curves" which assume that all WfGs performs quite similar-only specific power loading (kW/mC2) and single/dual speed or stall/pitch decides the calculated values. Productions are without wake losses. Cbr further details, ask at the Danish Energy Agency for project report Clnr. 51171/00-0016 or see Wind PRO manual chapter 3.5.2. The method is refined in EMD report "20 Detailed Case Studies comparing Project Design Calculations and actual Energy Productions for Wind Energy Projects worldwide", jan 2003. Use the table to evaluate if the given power curve is reasonable-if the check value are lower than -5%, the power curve probably is too optimistic due to uncertainty in power curve measurement. Power curve Powerc.Efficiency and energy vs. wind speed Original data from Windcat, Air density: 1.225 kg/m 3 Data used in calculation, Air density: 1.272 kg/m 3 New WindPRO method (adjusted Wind speed Power Ce Wind speed Ct curve IEC method, improved to match turbine control) CIRECOMMENDEDCI [m/s] [kVV] [m/s] Wind speed Power Ce Interval Energy Acc.Energy Relative 1.0 0.0 0.00 1.0 0.10 2.0 0.0 0.00 2.0 0.10 [mls] [kVV] [m/s] [MWh] [MWh] [%] 3.0 0.0 0.00 3.0 0.10 1.0 0.0 0.00 0.50-1.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 3.7 0.27 4.0 0.80 2.0 0.0 0.00 1.50-2.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 10.5 0.40 5.0 0.82 3.0 0.0 0.00 2.50-3.50 1.2 1.2 0.6 6.0 19.0 0.41 6.0 0.85 4.0 3.8 0.27 3.50-4.50 5.7 6.8 3.5 7.0 29.4 0.40 7.0 0.82 5.0 10.9 0.40 4.50-5.50 12.9 19.8 10.2 8.0 41.0 0.38 8.0 0.78 6.0 19.7 0.41 5.50-6.50 19.8 39.6 20.4 9.0 54.3 0.35 9.0 0.74 7.0 30.5 0.40 6.50-7.50 24.1 63.7 32.8 10.0 66.8 0.31 10.0 0.68 8.0 42.6 0.38 7.50-8.50 25.4 89.1 45.9 11.0 77.7 0.28 11.0 0.62 9.0 56.4 0.35 8.50-9.50 24.1 113.1 58.3 12.0 86.4 0.24 12.0 0.55 10.0 69.4 0.31 9.50-10.50 20.9 134.0 69.1 13.0 92.8 0.20 13.0 0.49 11.0 80.7 0.28 10.50-11.50 16.9 151.0 77.8 14.0 97.3 0.17 14.0 0.43 12.0 89.7 0.24 11.50-12.50 13.0 164.0 84.5 15.0 100.0 0.14 15.0 0.38 13.0 96.4 0.20 12.50-13.50 9.6 173.6 89.5 16.0 100.8 0.12 16.0 0.32 14.0 101.1 0.17 13.50-14.50 6.9 180.S 93.0 17.0 100.6 0.10 17.0 0.28 15.0 103.9 0.14 14.50-15.50 4.8 185.4 95.5 18.0 99.8 0.08 18.0 0.25 16.0 104.7 0.12 15.50-16.50 3.2 188.6 97.2 19.0 99.4 0.07 19.0 0.21 17.0 104.5 0.10 16.50-17.50 2.1 190.7 98.3 20.0 98.6 0.06 20.0 0.20 18.0 103.7 0.08 17.50-18.50 1.4 192.1 99.0 21.0 97.8 0.05 21.0 0.19 19.0 103.2 0.07 18.50-19.50 0.8 192.9 99.4 22.0 97.3 0.04 22.0 0.17 20.0 102.4 0.06 19.50-20.50 0.5 193.4 99.7 23.0 97.3 0.04 23.0 0.16 21.0 101.6 0.05 20.50-21.50 0.3 193.7 99.8 24.0 98.0 0,03 24.0 0.15 22.0 101.1 0.04 21.50-22.50 0.2 193.9 99.9 25.0 99.7 0.03 25.0 0.14 23.0 101.1 0.04 22.50-23.50 0.1 194.0 100.0 26.0 0.13 24.0 101.8 0.03 23.50-24.50 0.1 194.1 100.0 27.0 0.12 25.0 103.6 0.03 24.50-25.50 0.0 194.1 100.0 28.0 0.11 Q.£. 12 1" 16 18 20 Wind speed [m's] Project: IGIUGIG WAsP interface -Terrain Calculation: Site 04 WAsP calc Site r~rata: A-Site Data for WASP calc iJbstacles: 0 Obstacles used Roughness: Calculaf1on uses following MAP flies: C:lll\/indProLWINDPROrDatalll'ROcECTSrD.PIJOGIUGIGaROUGHNESSLINEUGIUGIGCO.wpo Printed/Page 10/12/2011 9:28AM /4 L1censeduser Knight Piesold Ltd 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1 000 US-DENVER, CO 80203 +1 303 629 8788 Rick Damiani I rdamiani@knightpiesold.com Calculated 10/12/201.1. 9:25.AM/2 (486 Min o: 309,470, Max n: 364,578, Min o: 6,552,383, Max CJ: 6,605,841, Width: 55,108 m, Height: 53,457 m Limited by a square on 40.0 km x 40.0 km around the current site urography: Calculation uses following MAP files: C:lll\/indProllNINDPROLDatalll'ROcECTSID.PCJIIGIUGIGIMAPSrDEMSIEillevccontoursr12ft.wpo 'Min ll: 333,606, Max 336,335, Min o: 6,578,626, Max o: 6,580,875, Width: 2,729 m, Height: 2,250 m C:IWindProlWINDPROmatalll'ROcECTSULPllllGIUGIGIJVIAPSLJDEMSlelevr:linesocombined[bpt.wpo Min 310,989, Max 365,373, Min o: 6,553,545, Max o: 6,607, 164, Width: 54,384 m, Height: 53,619 m Limited by a square on 10.0 km x 10.0 km around the current site Project IGIUGIG WAsP interface -Wind Data Analysis Ucensed user: Knight Piesold Ltd 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1000 US-DENVER, CO 80203 +1 303 629 8788 Rick Damiani I rdamiani@knightpiesold.com Calculated 10/12/2011 9 25 AM/27486 Calculation: Site 04 WAsP calcWind data: A -Site Data for WASP calc; Hub height: 30.0 1 Site Coordinates . UTM WGS 84 Zone: 5 East: 334,479 North: 6,578,131 NORTHWIND 100 Arctic 60HU100 21.0 @[i Wind statistics US PAIG Met Data (Matrix MCP using Iliamna MET Data).wws w w ~ u re ~ N ~ ~ Wind speed [mls] -~--ReferencE-< A=Et12;~ 1761:Vme?n=li5mls ~ Currentsne A=619:1\-1756:Vmean:::55m~ E w Weibull r~,ata Current site Sector A-Wind parameter speed [m/s] [m/s] ON 5.78 5.12 1 NNE 5.00 4.43 2 ENE 6.19 5.49 3E 8.88 7.86 4 ESE 7.84 7.00 5 SSE 4.73 4.25 6S 4.69 4.18 7 SSW 5.71 5.06 8WSW 5.18 4.59 9W 4.31 3.82 10WNW 5.04 4.46 11 NNW 6.07 5.38 All 6.19 5.52 w k-cJrequency parameter [%] 2.236 3.6 2.092 5.2 1.951 16.3 2.115 19.1 1.686 3.6 1.557 2.0 1.729 6.4 2.025 17.9 2.197 11.2 2.311 4.4 2.189 4.5 2.260 5.6 1.756 100.0 z "' Reference: Roughness class [I A- parameter [m/s] 5.58 4.59 5.90 8.95 8.10 4.74 4.61 5.63 5.10 4.19 5.00 5.99 6.12 k-[Jrequency parameter [%] 2.221 3.4 2.053 5.2 1.930 16.9 2.132 19.5 1.694 3.7 1.613 1.8 1.725 6.2 2.026 17.6 2.201 11.2 2.324 4.3 2.188 4.6 2.261 5.6 1.761 100.0 -Reier enc<c 1 ~ Cttrrent Sth? ! Project IGIUGIG 10/12/2011 9:28AM /6 licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 1000 US-DENVER, CO 80203 +1 303 629 8788 Rick Damiani I rdamiani@knightpiesold.com Calculated 10/12/20.11.9:25 AM/2.7486 WAsP interface -Map Calculation: Site 04 WAsP calc Wind data: A-Site Data for WASP calc: Hub height: 30.0 ~.~., -.\•.,'" ,\ ::,',,,"•,'""•''"::•, ·,',' ,' :<';;;,,,;:;-~,,,. ''.';"·'·<·.:· ''<',' '' :~.,.,c < ·:·'' <' ,·, '·.,· ·,,·;·· .A NewWTG 0 250 500 750 1000m Map: WindPRO map , Print scale 1:25,000, Map center UTM WGS 84 Zone: 5 East: 334,479 North: 6,578,131 ® Site Data Knight Piesold CONSULTING Enclosure D Igiugig Interim ReportCAugust ProJect IGIUGIG Meteo data report -Main results 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 1 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 []roadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 + 1 303 629 8788 Calculated: 9/10/2012 12:46 PM Mast: MET-TOWER; IGir-rr:owER; Igiugig I pte rim Report Period: 11u11 period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11.0 months) • Mast position: UTM WGS 84 Zone: 5 East: 334,375 North: 6,577,979 Measurement heights and wind speeds (in this report) Oisaoed dafll noOnDII'ded in overvierl Ill De c:eror:i ID Height Data recovery Records Uomax [m] [%] [m/s] 33.0m-A1 33.0 97.9 47217 27.6 33.0m-A2 33.0 97.8 47200 27.7 · 21.0m-IJ1 21.0 97.6 47083 24.3 rnu mean is siLliJIE! arimTl eriiJavera Le Ur.:mean 0 [m/s] 5.8 5.8 5.3 Scale: 50,000 M'l'an wind profile for all Donmment dala and terrain profile for the nnst freqtliilnt soot or of heigh!: 33.0m-A'l' SSW (lefl Direction distribution Distance from rrost (rr:i} all data (Note: Values are only fully valid in flat terrain) law 1.200 :Project : IGIUGIG Meteo data report -Main results 911012012 12:49 PM 12 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 [!roadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated· 9/1 0/2012 12:46 PM Mast:MET-TOWER: IGI'iTOWER; Igiugig Interim Report Period: ltull period 10/2/2011-9/1/2012(11 Omo~ths) Wnct speedidirection Statistics % Signal Unit Count Of Mean Wei bull Wei bull Weibull period mean A k [%] 33.0m-A1 WS,all m/s 47895 100.0 5.76 33.0m-A1 WS, enabled m/s 47217 98.6 5.82 5.89 6.61 1.76 33.0m-A1 WD,all Degrees 47895 100.0 162.88 33.0m -A1 WD. enabled Degrees 46061 96.2 154.53 33.0m-A1 Tu, all 47895 100.0 0.14 33.0m -A1 Tu, enabled 32409 67.7 0.11 33.0m-A1 T,all DegC 47895 100.0 -1.24 33.0m-A2 WS,all m/s 47895 100.0 5.76 33.0m -A2 WS, enabled m/s 47200 98.5 5.83 5.87 6.59 1.75 33.0m -A2 Tu, all 47895 100.0 0.14 33.0m-A2 Tu, enabled 32382 67.6 0.11 33.0m -A2 WD,all Degrees 47895 100.0 162.88 33.0m -A2 WD, enabled Degrees 46066 96.2 154.41 21.0m-D1 WS,all mls 47894 100.0 5.21 21.0m-ll1 WS, enabled mls 47083 98.3 5.28 5.31 5.96 1.73 21.0m -IJ1 Tu, all 47895 100.0 0.15 21.0m-LJ1 Tu, enabled 29301 61.2 0.13 21.0m-l:i1 WD,all Degrees 47895 100.0 162.88 21.0m-01 WD, enabled Degrees 45927 95.9 154.01 Hourly rr¥Jan wind speed Hourly rrean wind direction e-j·---t-~-4--~=±~-tL-~~~t=~~~~=f~ 5.:+:1~-=-=,"4-;= ~~;~~--_ ++-" =_ ::::.::::.-~~t:===~:±:=:::j:::::::j::::::::::..j_~'""::-+"""---+= ~ .· ' - ' ' -.. .. i 1 I ' t I I I I I - : I 4.54'1--+--+---+--l--+--+--il--+---+---+--i- 4-:!--+-+--+-+-+-+--+--+--t--t--t- 3.5iit--+-+---+--+--+---t--t--+---t--l--+- ~j----r--t---t---r--+--~--+---+---r--t---+- 2.5:!--+--il--il--i--i--t--t--t--t--+--t- 2:1---+-~l--il--i--i---t--t--t--t--+--+- 15~----+---+---l--l---+---+--+---4--l---t--+-- 1~'1---+---+---+---l---l-1-l-l-l--il--il--t---t-- 0.5 +-----+--~--t--+---t----11--+----+-----11--+---+-I i ~00 340 3:1J:J 300 2/lD 260 :240 220 2CO 1/lD 100 ·t~O 120 100 80 60 40 20 ' - I j ~ I l i I 0 I i I . : ; : ' l l 2 4 6 e 10 12 14 16 1S 20 22 :: Wind speed, Averaging. 12 hours Wind direction. Averaging: 12 hours 1011412011 12/13/2011 111212012 211112012 411112012 &1112012 I ~· 33.0n1-A'l .... 33.0m .. A2-21.0!~ .. B11 WindPRO is deve!OL~d uo mJ Cl rJnernar1onaDJmlUDie!S Jernesve010oomm220 oambrLI rJ curn D4D 06 DLJ44 441TJacJ IJ4CJ cl6 lJD 44 4612effil aiUJJrJindLroo eu d. do I I =t= I- I- . I I ··-' / \ .... ~ ' / '· J '\ / /' : 12 20 ProJect IGIUGIG Meteo data report -Missing data -calendar view 9/10/2012 12:49 PM /3 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 oroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated: 9/10/201212:46 PM Mast: MET-TOWER; IGirTOWER.: 1f1iugig Inte\if11 Report ~eriod: rull p~rio9: 1 0/2/2~11.-91,112012 (11 0 months) Height: r r .rm • Au Signal: WS Signal: Wo Signal: Tu lJay : Month/Liear % 6ci!2011 142.3 . ...-:-:=:":-:t--•--r:c"c-·C:·.:c -some records missing, disabled, erroneous, or out of range current day -all records missing, disabled, erroneous, or out of range current day . ~~~;;g~ 1~ l?zr;t-c-:"""-t--sr-=="---.c--~--0-~-:-':f-O-::t~~--'--;:-:----'-;=-~c:--::::,.~-;:" ···:.-.-'o=.+--:-::-r-'--:-r-·'-:T-'-;;-L ·"--"-"'--''-"cc-'C7+·-=+~"''-'--""-'-'~'-w, _t:a_n/20 12 ...j.]_9 7 r~eb/2012_-h 6 7~---'"""':..;-•->-~-1---::c~ 1 ~;;?gg-_D~~~t-c'""-'-,_s,-:::::-r--=-:c--: ~:-c-:c:::.:-:::+:-:::::·-··c~--o-:"--~-'--·==·-=~:;;;;:,-"-;:.~-:::,.-=--::-r-~~c-;;.-::-::-;--cc::.----:::-~:::c-· ::-"---;-::+-c:-:::t:---:c~:-:::----'-;'i··--;;;.-:·~-­ , May/2012 I .32 s.t-'-:-""-t--=:::f-"•c::t-s-::c::+---c=t· =~:r-::-::-:-r3-.-:=:+:-::=-~-::-'-'-'-;:t-3----";':;+-"::=T-::-~-•~uni2ri 12 -=R22t-c'-'-"'-+~_--"'·~--'"-f..-~--'.-''-.---'""i---'..-"-+---"'~"""'-""'~''---"'!···=-".!-~-.'-''-'--''-"-'--' -"'·····-"+-,"'+-:+ =c_,.,= --"'-:c+-::=.t--,-"-='-·"''••-"-""i-"':c.--+:c+-c-"-"':-""--.., :.ul/2012 : 522+-c~'"f---.:::-::••---:-'--~:C·:E·:>+::--: +---=-t-:-:'7'-;-:-':~-:~·+--:::;::.--:.-::-r-::-;;~•=---;+-"'''-;---;~CC::-:-+:c;;-:±:::::.--:-:::-c-:c:c•c-:-::oc·'-2 ::F::-::c=-:r--:~·'=-::-' -,-;-c-;-;-:..:-;-·,_--;~c:::;-•~ugl2b12 146}lf-'='4····'·-"i-''-l .,,..,_,_,,, __ ,.; "'"''-'-'""-L':-c• ___ . _ _._,, ,Se[)/2Q1_2 0.0 __L __ .L__L.--.J -----"~---'--'-~_L_-~_ .. .L -----'--__ .L__o____j _______ , ___ .L____j __ .c __ .. __ ,_ __ .L_ __ L._ . .l_ .. •--'----, __ ,L_ __ , Total _Ll""~["'-,c"'--'~= WindPRO is devertKEd OJ CJD o !Br&ma!E:maGJUIJLIJie!S Jemesver.J10DJfJLil220 oamoro o Wml 04U 05 O:J 44 44rnao 040 C!6 ITJ 44 46C13f.1Daimrlindcroo eu d.d[; i Project 'IGIUGIG Meteo data report-Missing data -calendar view 9/10/2012 12:49 PM /4 L1censeo user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 oroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 + 1 303 629 8788 Calculated 9/10/2012 I 2:46PM Mast: MET-TOWER; I Gil rrOWER; Igiugig _Interim Rep?rt Period: null period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 {11.0 months) ... LonrinLed tmu urevioc:s U3Le Day Month/Dear % Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 sep12o1Z--~o~o~ oj ol--T r:::_~T~~j-_CI:::_l=L_L-:::L_I_::_T-T~~J--ri::l--:-~J--T-__L_J···· LT:.T--:-I:] I~IJ.::::::J , J2lar___'~: DO CCLI .... Height: [J[J on -Arl Signal: WS Signal: Tu -some records missing, disabled, erroneous, or out of range current day -all records missing, disabled, erroneous, or out of range current day WindPRO is deveroced [[] LJLI u rnremar1onaDJITOCJIJiers Jernesveo10oomiTJ220 oarrroro o oorru D4C1 L'6 nJ 44 44LiCJao EJ4D c16 Dll44 461 .ecrrJ aiEIIJDindc:rocJ el 1 d.dLl ProJect .·IGIUGIG Meteo data report -Missing data -calendar view Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 uroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated 9/10/2012 1246 PM 'Mast:. MET-TO\IVER; IGI rffOWER; Igiugig ,Interim Report Period: ; lUll period 1 0/2/2011 -9/1/2012 ( 11.0 months) 'Height L L.l.l~ln ~ uLJ Signal: WS 'Signal: Tu [lay -some records missing, disabled, erroneous, or out of range current day -all records missing, disabled, erroneous, or out of range current day Month/r 'ear % ;oct12o11 -, 4e~3t:ffitrr=r~~~Q!J]~:t~~L!QsJliii1~sJ~~~':_-§r "'"'~--"':-=:-'"-'~···'"'~-'-'-'-~---=-'"-·-----~--·---L·""-"'--~'.,.. ••. ~---""-~-c--.~--""'C-":z.l.-"--. _Nov~o11I: • 34.2~~~-~~=+-~--~~-~=·~~-~~:~~-~--~~-~-~c:~-~---·~~~~-~c=··~,~~~-~~=·--~~~-~~-~~~:·~=~~--~~=~·~r=~-~~~ Dec/20 11 ! 33.2 f-''---"-l-".'C--"''-L"'-'--~ -~,·--=+ ... ~--'-''-'~''=-.--·-=··--''='---, :-cL'-..?.;.'.'-::C,.--.c=--cc·""-.-'-':"· --C:...,_·c-"-r ·"-C''c--.--'---"-'---""'~-+'-2:':: '-"-"~-'"'''-1--.~"C--c.-m,--=--~.2.'.B!!""·· fa~20f2::~~2~~~~~~~--~~--:~~~-~~-·~·--~7~~:-~~-~=~~~~"cc:~~~~~~~--~~~--·~···::.~,~~~~~~~=·~~=-~··'"~·-·-· Ieb/20 1 ;2 __(._20 7!--'-'--'+---'+--"'~+""'-,--.-"..---· "+·..-'-C. .. •=t--'--'---,.:c:-•~----''+--'-"+-...c:'l-'"+-"~"--c:.:.., "=i--='C'+--'""'l···~"',.__ ___ --. .. ..,.,.:: r'""'-'"-'"'-f--'"-'-+~'' -"~':'-'-~+'~~ ...... ~..,c .. • :_fv1ar/2012 _;_32 _3~":-:=t-·-=:•..,;,::-t· :::.--::c?--~~~':'-'----::---::+--:::::•· .. --,>-~i--~-:0'-"-~-c---=':;;----::-,.--=-:~?-;.~;,-;-~--;~~-, c:----~·:r'-:+c:.:c:~:-~,.c-::.-:::7·~'--.::::+--"-"·'c--. j\pr/201_2 _;_ 32 5!---'':--:-'-t-.;:';i~;:+.-;~:+ .. ;:;::._:;;:y:.;:;;::.,.-o-~;,--';;:c . .;::;_,-~-;,~...;:-r"-!.~c.-·3-;;.:-~-;~+-...-?~""--'C' c' · "-t . ..:,·:::L=:..'>i:t:~ .... ,.?.L.~~"-''L'-:~-~~"--"C'L-"L-cc'..-·• : fv1ay/2Q12 __ j38 11---'"'-':-'+:~:--=-:r:,~-~7-.::~3---=-::-:--::~=-=-=c-::-::~··==.;..:."='~;.i--,~-::::7-.::::---:c­.Llm/~012 __ 1_3§., 9 l::UI.'20 12 ~-l.5f'AI---''-:-"-'1··~:o:;+-:::::t-:-:::'---::::::<--3r--:::-~;:;;::---:::co·3:-:::-·_,_.~;- Aug/2012 _l_4:.6,41-~-"-l--"-"---",-~-,-· §,Elp/2Q11.__t-l ....;1.;.::.9'11-="-i· J:(Jt<)l ___Jc..;ill=L'"-'="-= WindPRO is deveroc:ed moo o rnremarionarTJflilfJUiers JemesveD10CrJ( IC11:!220 uarroortJ Cl lJIJ!TIJ LJ4!J c.J6 ClCl44 44lTJaD D4D a5 lJU 44 46CBDll ai[]]Oindcro! 1 e!J d. do IGIUGIG Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 iJroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated 9/10/2012 12:46 PM Meteo data report-Time series graphs Ma!)t: MET-TOWER; IGiilTOWER; Igiugig Interim Report Pe.riod: ilull period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11 .0 months) 3()<')-!-....,.--l---,,.:--+---- 200:li-,.:--l"""''----,+-""""-!fi:i' VIIS, Averaging: None \ND, Averaging; None ·tOO·f:: .. ~~!:L=Dt&t=t:=:~=t=t:=re~n~r:=~t:::::tE~w~ 0~ I ' ' ' 0 1111r.il'J11 OS 0.2 111112011 101412011 1CV612:i11 10'&'20'11 1011012011 1011212011 1(1114/2011 10/1612011 10'1er.l0'11 1012012011 1012212011 1ill24!20n 1012er.1e>11 10'2612011 1000201·1 1111/2J11 Tu, Averaging: None 1014/2011 1G'6'2G11 1011:/2011 10'1012011 1011212011 lil'14'2011 10'16'20'11 10113'2011 1G'20'2011 1!:1'2212011 10124!2011 10'28/2J11 10'2&'2011 10002011 1111/2J11 111;,'2011 111012011 111712011 11/;;2Q11 1115'2011 111712011 T, Averaging: None 4-~~4 · ·~-~~r --~--J~f?ii···. ·-~· ., .. f·--··~1-=-t:: i 10!10120'1'1 W/12120'1 1 101!412Jl1 1G'1612011 1Q/l8/3J11 1G'20'20t: 1{1'2212011 ·10124!201'1 10121>20'11 10'2&'2011 '10002011 I ..... J:l.Cln·l\11 VIIS, Averaging: None \ND, Averaging; None 111!112J11 11111/2:)11 11113'2011 1'!11;.'2011 1111712J11 111111'2011 1'1121r.il'J11 111Zll2011 11125'2011 1112712011 111211'2011 Tu. Averaging: None 11tw.20'11 1111112011 1111312011 1111512011 1111712011 11111\'2011 1112112011 111Zli2011 11125/2011 11127/2011 171l?/2011 T, Averaging: None 1211/2:)11 121112J11 111'!/2J11 111312011 111512011 111712011 11/912011 11111/2011 11113'2011 11110/2011 11/l?/20'1'1 1111912011 11121/201'1 '!'112312011 '111:151201! '1112712011 1112ilf.1011 121112011 WindPRO is deve!O[Ed uo nn D LmemaeionamrnmllieiS Jernesveu10ooom220 oaf!lbrrJ o rTmn o4o o6 on44 441 naD r-l4rJ rl6 Lll44 46LSCil:J airruuindtJoD el J d.dcJ IGIUGIG • Meteo data report -Time series graphs Licensed user: Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 uroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated: 9/10/2012 12:46 PM Mast MET-TOWER; IGir:ifOWER; Igiugig lnterin: Report Period: f!UII period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11 .0 m9nths) INS, Averaging: 1\kme 12'112011 12'312011 121512011 12'712011 1211112011 12!1312011 1211512011 1211712011 12119'2011 12'2112011 12'2312011 12120/2011 1212712011 12'2SY21l11 1213112011 00, Averaging: 1\bne 12/l!2011 1215/2011 12'712011 1219'20'11 1211l'2011 12115'2011 12f17121l11 12119'2011 121211:0.011 12123/2011 12125'2011 0.4+-..,---'·'-l---:--+---+-:-""""",---!------+-- 0.2 Tu. Averaging; 1\bne 1213112011 121112011 121:?12011 1~201'1 12'712011 12/Q'2011 1211112011 1211;?;-;20'!1 1211512011 12'1712011 12119'2011 12/2112011 12'2:?12011 12120/2011 12'2712011 12'2912011 1213112011 T. Averaging: 1\bne l '12'!1201'! 121312011 121&20!'! 12'712011 '121£1'2011 12!1112011 1211312011 1211512011 12'1712011 '1211912011 12121120'1'1 '1212312011 '13125'20'!'! 1212712011 1212£1'2011 1213112011 INS, Averaging: 1\bne ' 11412012 110>'2012 11&'201:2 lrtE/2012 1002012 1/;l2'2012 112412012 112612012 112812012 113012012 00, Averaging: 1\bne 112'2012 114f2012 11612012 111012012 111212012 1111>'2012 111612012 1120'20'12 1124/2012 112<r.o12 Tu, Averaging: None 112'2012 114/21l12 11612012 118'2:)12 1110/2012 1112'2012 11141201:! 111612012 111612012 1120/2012 1122'2012 1/2412012 1121'),'2012 11281:0.012 1/30/2012 2'112012 T, Averaging: 1\bne 111012012 111212012 111412012 111~>'2012 111612012 112012012 1r2212012 '112412012 1 ~" 33.o~-~~,l WindPRO is deve!OL..ed orJ uu o cmerna®narnrnmote(S JernesveCI10oomn_l220 oaumrrl o cnru [J4D o6 Dll44 44fTJacJ u4o 06 lJCI44 46CeDD aiiTIJWndcroo eo d. do J 112&2012 I "' ~ 112812012 113012012 21112012 IGIUGIG 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 8 L1censeduser Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 oroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated· 9/10/2012 12:46 PM Meteo data report -Time series graphs Mast MET-TOWER; IGirffOWER; Igiugig Interim Report Period: rrull period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11.0 months) INS, Averaging: None 211,12012 213'201 2 21:>2012 "21712012 2/11'2012 2113/2012 2''15/2012 2'"17!2012 2119'"2012 212112012 2/23,'2012 212512012 212712012 21211'2012 IND, Averaging: None 2/11"2fJ12 21912012 211112012 2/1312012 2/15'2012 2/11¥"2fJ12 21211"2fJ12 212312012 212S/2012 212712012 2.>2S/2012 Tu. Averaging: None T, Averaging: None ·ID·~~~==t=~t===t=~t=~+.~~~=+~=+~=+~=+~~==~~~~ 2111'2012 2/!"112012 2113/2012 211512012 211712012 2/lg/2012 212112012 2l23/2012 2125'2012 2>2712012 2>29/2012 I -· 33.Qn· A1j INS. Averaging: N:me :>'212012 :;><412012 J/1>'2012 318/2012 ~11012012 311212012 ::V1412012 3/"16<'2012 3/HI/2012 312012012 31221"2fJ12 3/2412012 31:<:el2012 IND. Averaging: f\bne ' 0 012'.i012 31412012 ~12 31&2012 3!1012JJ12 311212012 311412012 311<12012 3118/2012 312012012 312412012 312G'2012 312ll'2'J12 :Jr.ll/2012 41"!1"2fJ12 Tu. Averaging: None llS· !)6· 0.4 cc;: o .. 2/21'2012 31412012 31612012 3/S/2012 3'1ll/2012 3/1212012 3114!2J12 3/1612012 3/18/2012 312012012 :J/2212ll12 312412012 :ll:<:el2012 3/281"2fJ1Z :Jr.il!20"l2 41112012 T, Averaging: f\bne 20, o: -ro-: 3121"2fJ12 31412012 316'2012 3,'&'2012 31101"2fJ12 311212012 3114/ID12 3116'2012 311812012 312012012 3.'2212012 3/26'2012 3'28/"2fJ12 :Jr.il!2012 41112012 1-33.0"!\·A.ll WindPRO is devetoced CD Llll CJ llill&ma[fonarurwooieiS Jernesveo10m r:111n220 oarr:ooro o DLJilll lJ4D C16 CII44 44LOaCJ D4CJ 06 flU 44 46cern aiiTIJDindl.ron eo d. do ProJect IGIUGIG 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 9 Meteo data report -Time series graphs Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 rJroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Carcc~!ated: 9/10/2012.12:46 PM IVI~st: MET-TOWER; 1Gir1TOWE~; Igiugig Interim ReportPE!riod: rlullperiod: ,10/2/2011-9/1/2012 (11.0 months) INS, Averaging: 1\bne 41112012 41312l12 41512012 41712012 41W:Z012 41'1312012 411512012 411712012 4/'IS':tll'l2 412112012 41Zl/2012 4125>2012 4127/2012 4/2£\':tll12 WD, Averaging: None 4171:2012 4~2 4/111:tll12 4113/2012 4/15/2012 411712012 411&'N!2 412112012 4123':2012 4125121l12 41271'2012 ~12 511/:tll12 Tu, Averaging: None 0.4 411/:tiJU 41<12012 4/SI:tll12 417!.2012 419201:? 411112012 411312012 411512012 4117f:tll12 4/1\¥3)12 41211;;()12 4/23':tll12 41251201: 4l27/2J12 4/2£i':tll12 5/1f:tll12 T Averaging: None -~:~t:::::;:. +% f -::;::;:~~jjh=· ·--~~q :;:;::±" -~~~. ~::t:::-t::;::t-E~·::t:;:::·]· ·~"' ··1 ~-· ··t.:i ~~~-F~·· :t=i · =4~s=t;:::=:· 1 ±:;::::±=+··· 1 ...::.......::;::;:::;. • 4/112012 4/3/3:)12 415'2.112 417l:tll12 4192012 411112012 4/12/:tll12 411512012 411712.l12 41192012 4/2'112012 4122/2012 412512012 412712.l12 4/3\12012 51112012 I ~ 3J.Ol\•A11 \IllS. Averaging; N:me 51112012 51312012 51fJ;;Q12 51712012 51913l12 511112012 511312!:~2 511512:112 511712:112 ~1912:112 512112:112 .512312012 512512012 5'2712012 S/3112012 WD. Averaging. 1\bne S/:?12012 51S.2012 51712:112 S/912)12 511//ZQ12 511912012 5/2112012 512JIZQ12 Sl25/21l12 5127/2:112 S/3112012 Tu, Averaging: None S/112:112 510/J012 S/S'2012 51712:112 S9/2012 S/1112012 S/1312012 S15'2J12 511712012 51192012 512112012 5f2312(l12 5125'2012 512712012 512112012 50112012 T, Averaging: None -~te ~*··I --l I 5'112l}l2 51?.'2012 5151ZJ12 51712012 f\1912012 5'1112012 511312012 51'1512:112 5117i3H2 511912012 5'21l:tlll2 5123f.'!l12 tv2S121l·12 5127fZJ12 512912012 513112012 I ~ :JJ.un· ,.,,, WindPRO is deveLO[ed DLl oo u llllr:&marlonaiTJ[[[JDDiers Jernesveo10ooo00220 IJaOJXlriJ o OOITIJ 040 06 UC144 44DlJao 04o o6 oo 44 46r.em aiiTIJDindcron eel d. do IGIUGIG 9/10/201212:49 PM 110 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 CJroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated 9110/2012 12:46 PM . Meteo data report -Time series graphs • Mast:. MET-TOWER; IGI'TOWE~;t.giugig Interim Report Period: rull period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11.0 months) WS, Averaging: ttlne 151213112 6'4120'12 0'612012 G/0'2012 0'100012 6'1412012 6116/3112 6'1 612012 6'2Ci'2012 6'2212012 612412012 6120'3112 61)012012 vvr:J. Averaging; None &2/Z012 <1412012 610'2012 611ll2012 6'100012 {ii'I413J12 &'10'2012 6!1812012 6'21:1'2012 612212012 6'2412012 6/2a12012 6t0C\12012 Tu. Averaging: ttlne as-j--~------+------+----~~----~-----;------c+------+------r-----~-----+-+-----------+------+-----~--- 0.6"!---r---~ IJ.4'li--f--...., 0 6'Z'2012 61413112 6'612012 618'2012 6110t3J12 6'1Z3l12 6'1412012 G/1612012 611612012 612012012 &221201::: 6!24/2012 6120'2012 6.'2&'2012 51)012012 T, Averaging: None 6/212012 €14120'12 61612012 61612012 61100012 6112'2012 6>'1412012 6/1€12012 61'1el2012 6'2012012 e.r=ot2 612412012 &20'3l12 6/2!\12012 613012012 I~ :lJ.tll1•A11 WS. Averaging: ttlne 71'1r.C~2 71412012 7/6'201:' 7/af2012 711012012 711212012 71141::'012 711&?:Jt2 711612012 712G'Z012 7iZ1/2012 712412012 71:i£H2012 7130.12012 81112012 vvr:J, Averaging. ttlne 71412012 716.'.2012 716'2012 7l10/201~ 711212012 711412012 711&'2012 711el2012 7/2212012 7124/2012 7/2€12012 712812012 7/?ll/2012 81112012 Tu. Averaging; None 712'2012 7141'2012 71612012 7/f:/2012 71lfY.2012 7/1212012 711412012 7116!2012 71'18i2D12 7120/2012 71:'2'2012 712413112 7126!2012 7126'2012 7/?IJIZJ12 81112012 T. Averaging: None -~l ~ 1 ~~~~~,·••,»'&1 . l-·-· , .. ~ . ~~ "1 ' ' 71212012 71412012 716'2012 71&12012 711012012 111212012 711412012 7116/2012 mem12 7120/2012 :!3.tln·A11 l 712212012 712413112 7126'2012 WmdPRO is deve1oced rn oo '1 ::m!emarfonamrrn!IJiefS Jemesveot ocnCJQD220 uam:orn L 1 rniTIJ D4n c6 co 44 44DJao 040 cu o 144 46Uea J aimnindcrot·J eo d. do ··r····" ....... l ........... ~ .... . \ ' ' i 712812012 7t0C\12012 81112012 Project IGIUGIG 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 11 Meteo data report -Time series graphs licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 oroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated 9/10/2012 12.46 PM :Mast: MET~T()WER; IGIIITOWER; Igiugig Interim Report Period: llullperiod: .10/2/2011-9/1/2012 (11.0 months) INS, Averaging: None 81112012 812i:l012 81:'/:;Q12 W/2012 S'9/:ll12 811112012 81131:l'J12 8115.0012 &1712012 8/19/2012 ll/2112012 812Ji:l'J12 8!25'2012 8!2712012 8!29'2012 ll/3112012 \f\!i.), Averaging. None 81312012 !l/0.'2012 81712012 ll/912012 811112012 811312012 lll15/:l'J12 e/1712012 811912012 812112012 e/2312012 8'25.0012 D.4-Jr-'C--.._;r--_,-..,- o.2 Tu. Averaging; None 812912012 8'3112012 M/Zl:/12 813D:I12 811>'2012 Wl:l'J12 6/li\'2012 SJ1112012 811=12 &15/2012 !'11712012 !'llli\'2012 8l2112012 a'Zl/2012 li\'2512012 a12712012 8!211'2012 ll/3112012 T, Averaging: None l'' . 1 ., ·; L -~··1 ~"-·-1 ·--· l · ·1 I 81912012 811112012 811=12 8/1512012 ,!J17CJI2 !'/1li\'2012 &2112012 SIZ!I:'\ll2 8125.0012 er.!rr:?JJ12 8!2!312012 8131/2()12 I .. 33.Utl-A11 INS, Averaging: None "" i <r. I 1111/2012 1>1'112012 Ml:l'J12 91112012 91112012 'i\1112\112 1!1112012 91112012 \f\!i.), Averaging: 1\bne 300· I . .! I 200~ I l I J I -! I I 1 I \ I ' ' ' li\'1/2012 I:Yl/2012 lil'1i2012 I:Yl/2012 91'112012 \i\'112012 1!1112012 Wll:l'J12 ll/112012 1?1112l12 i\'112012 :?/112)'12 ll''ll:l'J12 >1'1f<.IJ12 91'112012 11'112012 &/'112012 Tu. Averaging: None 9111:X:•12 11'11201;; 11'1/2012 9!112012 1!1112J12 11'112012 S/112012 Ql112012 91112012 11'112012 91112012 li\'112012 SI11201Z 911/2012 1¥112012 !31112012 \il112012 91112012 !.Averaging: None WindPRO is deveror1:'d no oo o rnremarlonammmuiem Jernesveo1 OfJI:-J CJa:l220 oaffibro o DDITIJ 04o rJ6 oo 44 44ooan CJ4D C6 oo 44 46c em aiW.iLlindcrou ef J d. do I ProJect IGIUGIG : Meteo data report -Monthly wind speeds 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 12 Licensed user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 []roadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated: 9/10/2012 12.:46 PM Mast: MET-T()WER: IGI'TfOWER; Igiugig Interim Report Period: r;uiJ period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11.0 months) Monthly wind speeds 33.0m-A1 Month 2011 2012 Mean Mean of month f ranuary 5.41 5.41 5.41 r.ebruary 8.62 8.62 8.62 March 5.58 5.58 5.58 ;•April 5.97 5.97 5.97 May 5.75 5.75 5.75 rune 5.16 5.16 5.16 ruly 4.55 4.55 4.55 August 4.93 4.93 4.93 September 5.60 5.60 5.60 October 5 06 5.06 5 06 :·November 6.37 6.37 6.37 December 6.82 6.82 6.82 mean, all data 6.10 5.72 mean of months 6.08 5.73 5.82 Monthly wind speeds 33.0m-A2 Month 2011 2012 Mean Mean of month C1muary 5.39 5.39 5.39 L'ebruary 8.59 8.59 8.59 March 5.54 5.54 5.54 'April 5.93 5.93 5.93 May 5.73 5.73 5.73 e_une 5.13 5.13 5.13 , LUiy 4.58 4.58 4.58 :August 5.04 5.04 5.04 September 5.72 5.72 5.72 October 5.13 (i.13 5.13 November 6.43 6.43 6.43 December 6.78 6.78 6.78 mean, all data 6.13 5.72 mean of months 6.11 5.74 5.83 Monthly wind speeds 21.0m-u1 Month 2011 2012 Mean Mean of month : canuary 4.80 4.80 4.80 L'ebruary 7.80 7.80 7.80 March 5.05 5.05 5.05 April 5.39 5.39 5.39 May 5.23 5.23 5.23 cune 4.87 4.87 4.87 CUiy 4.18 4.18 4.18 August 4.55 4.55 4.55 September 4.81 4.81 4.81 :October 4.51 4.51 4.51 November 5.73 5.73 5.73 December 6.05 6.05 6.05 mean, all data 5.44 5.22 mean of months 5.43 5.19 5.25 WindPRO Is develli['ed UiJCJU lJ rnremaUonaiTJilllO:Jiets Jemesveo1000DDD220 oa[l]brDOOJITL 040 c-:6 0044 44EIJaD04lJ CJ6 Ctl44 46CB!lJai!UlJindr:roo eDd.do I !IGIUGIG Meteo data report-Weibull data overview 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 13 License-d user Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 oroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calculated 9/10/2012.12:46 PM 'Mast: MET-TOWER; IGIIff()WER; Igiugig Interim Report Period: rrullperiod: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11.0 months) Height: UJI.m-AU Weibull data Sector A k Mean wind speed [m/s] [m/s] 0-N 4.18 1.404 3.75 3.80 1-NNE 5.76 1.999 12.50 5.10 2-ENE 9.15 2.003 19.88 8.11 3-E 8.60 1.942 5.68 7.63 4-ESE 5.58 1.371 2.37 5.10 : 5-SSE 4.85 2.015 2.78 4.30 6-S 6.40 2.045 10.37 5.67 7-SSW 6.33 1.972 21.67 5.61 8-WSW 4.94 1.977 8.93 4.38 19-W 5.22 2.434 4.91 4.63 10-WNW 6.54 2.453 4.83 5.80 11-NNW 5.67 1.710 2.33 5.06 Mean 00.1 DODD urnrn om g. . ·.\, I l .•.. v"' I i"' ·-II ~~ s: 5-II/ \ .. I '{/ . '·-,'~ i 4 . I <' ~·"····:. .\~ 1 ~ 'l r--::. I / '\ '\ ., 2-· 'N Ji h /f .. \ ..... ".I\ I j. J I\ /_ L ~ I 0 I ll·! I h' 8 tJ7 ,/ ~"';::::::-I II 1// J~ '\ ~ r<~::-. I 7 / i \ i\' '\J_ <>. I i 6_ I ! ·>l \ \ ' !'\:, ~-~"-' ~ j l.' t_, "-~., I ' 4; \ •.. (\ ' ;'/ 11\ ·>. ,'\,~ "r··>""· '\,'~., ··.,' ' ~-. >=' .• ~ I I I ' '"" I'>. I " ·~ ,, :~~ r--...... "< ::::~. I ·I · .. ·· r.._ ~ ~~-.-r--._ ·· .. t:::-. I 0 ' '' ''' 'i f 2 4 10 ·n ~~ t: '14 1::, 1E 11 16 1£> :.:!1 21 '*"'> 2?, 24 [m'sJ -AIIP:6.5m's!<.I.76Vm·.5.!lmls NA:42mlsk:'lAO\Im:3.Smls E k S.6mts k 1 94Vm: 7.6mf~ ESE A: 5.6mts k 1.37Vm; 5<·1 m/~ --SS\!llA:G.3mlsk't.~l7Vm:5..6tWs --VVSV-.JA~4.91W?.k 1Ji8Vti,~4.4mls NNW A.: S.7mls ~: 1,71 Vm: 5,1 ml• NNE A: M mls h: 2.00Vm: 5.'1 mls SSE A: 4.8 rrVs k 2.CC Vm. 4.3 mis WA: 5.2nvsk 2.4?-Vm: 4.6nVs WindPRO is devell)C~d DLl oo o !11ll£1rnalibnarnrnmc.lie!S Jernesven10lJOOOD220 uaUJbrO o rnan D4o 06 oo 44 44Uuao D4lJ ll6 ou 44 46U~!]Jairmoindcroo ell d.diJ B·JEA: fUmtsk: 2.00Vm: &.1 m/s SA. e·Amlsk 2.04Vm;5.7mls v'INW A: o.s mls k 2.45 Vm: 5.31~/s Project IGIUGIG Meteo data report -Weibull data overview 9/10/2012 12:49 PM I 14 l1censed user: Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 uroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Calw!ate<l 9/10/2012 12:46 PM Mast: MET-TOWER; IGI rrrOWER; Igiugig _Interim Report Period: r1u11 period: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 ( 11.0 months) Height: Li iLm -A[, Weibull data Sector A k Mean wind speed [m/s] [mfs] O-N 4.18 1.381 3.76 3.82 1-NNE 5.68 2007 12.50 5.03 2-ENE 9.11 1.983 19.89 8.07 3-E 8.62 1.934 5.67 7.64 4-ESE 5.71 1.390 2.36 5.21 5-SSE 4.94 2.069 2.78 4.38 6-S 6.42 2.076 10.36 5.68 7-SSW 6.23 1.949 21.68 5.53 8-WSW 4.82 2.014 8.94 4.27 9-W 5.28 2:438 4.92 4.68 10-WNW 6.75 2.415 4.83 5.98 11-NNW 6.09 1.696 2.31 5.44 Mean [1[0 OLJTi u_ucn ['i[[J 18.( .. , '\ I 1e '< c-;:::-'"' I 17 /' ' f \\ 1e.s- 1-0. II \\ T!i:"::·v II \I 1// ~ 14.£ 14 i3.S 13 r 12.5 .~. I \\.\. 12 1\ II 1'/ -.... I, 115 fjjC. li 11, 1"- 105 1-I 10 95-~ fli 8 / 85" !I! . /' ~-I 1/: f lr' .,, 8 7.$~ tl I? / :-. I I ' r'l · .. •·· 6.5' / \ 1\\ \. '··. 6 . I \. \\ ;. '\ '·· 5.5-. /I ' \\ '. '• .. 5 \\ \'\. •._., 4.5' y· \~H, "-. 4· / ·~. .,, ? ~ "\ · ... I 25~· ~ ' •. ~-... I ' .,_ .. ' '•. ., I :I· '"' ""' ..... '""· 1.5 ''> -~;: ·-.. 1----I ns'l'i I ........ :::---"or I -· ... ,,, ,. ' 4 '10 11 12 t3 '14 [m's] -All P.: €·.5 mls k L76 Vm• 5.9 mls N A: 4.2 m/s k. ·t3B Vm: 3.S mls E .A.:8.6m/s k 1 G!:jVm, 7.6nv~ ESE fl.: 5.7ml~ k I,J&Vm: 5,2mls SSWA,: 6.2mls k 'I.S6Vm:5.5rr\ls --WSWA· 4.81\'llsk 2.0'1 Vm:4.3n·J• NNWA: 6.1 ml• k '1.70 \11\l: ~.4 ml> NNE A: 5.7mls k 2.01 \lm: 5.0mls :SSE A. 45• nVtz.k 2.07Vm.4Ami<S VVA: fc3nll$k 2.44Vm:4.711lls WindPRO is devell:H=ed Cll ou rJ !IJ~maiJbnamfliiDrJiels Jemesvel J10ooom220 oa!lJbrU Cl cum D4D c~6 LJ] 44 44Doau CJ4U 116 oo 44 46[EUJ aillrJl JindcrocJ ec1 d. do ' I I I i I : I I ' ' ' i ' ' I I i ! i I I ' i i I i j : I j I i I i I I l I I 1 I I I ' I I i I I I I I I i I I I ! I I ! I ! I I ' I J 8\lE A: D.·t nvsk: 1.98 Vm~S. t mts S ?,: 6.4 mls k 20S \lm: S.i mis W~INA: Ei.7 ml;.l( 2A'I Project IGIUGIG Meteo data report -Weibull data overview 9/10/201212:49 PM /15 Licensed user: Knight Piesold Ltd 1999 oroadway, Suite 600 US-DENVER, CO 80202 +1 303 629 8788 Caiculated: 9/10/2012 12:46 PM Mast: MET-TOWER; IGIPfOWER; Igiugig lnte;imReport Peri()d:.1 1ull peri?d: 10/2/2011 -9/1/2012 (11 0 months) Height u ,Lm - Weibull data Sector A k Mean wind speed [m/s] [m/s] 0-N 3.88 1.380 3.74 3.55 1-NNE 5.25 1.982 12.53 4.66 2-ENE 8.19 1.987 19.94 7.26 3-E 7.56 1.907 5.68 6.71 4-ESE 4.80 1.300 2.36 4.44 5-SSE 4.36 1.976 2.78 3.87 6-S 5.69 1.919 10.34 5.05 7-SSW 5.87 1.902 21.66 5.21 8-WSW 4.55 1.869 8.94 4.04 9-W 4.55 2.353 4.92 4.03 10-WNW 5.61 2.317 4.82 4.97 11-NNW 5.11 1.675 2.30 4.56 Mean um C!Uil nrnriJ UUJ 2 f·- l I (),-I ! I I / ""' i ! ~ ·:; \I 8- 7 j IIX \I\ I 1/ -•" [\\ i I I tl~ II 1\\ I 5~ .L ·2. I i -.. ~ \ ·I 4-/;1 :-~' I I .3:: .\ !: I/' ~ I 2 .. w I I I I' I j. ' //; !/ I 1,:1 / I I !J i/' / ! I 9 II ,./ 1/ \ ~>,, I s- n ry /j " '{· .. ! I 7-, 6 // '\'·~ 1'··, I I ~t, !'•<'' •. I I 5- / 1\.. ·->·-I l 4- \ \. i' '\ ~ ·. >-. I I 3- I \_"':., <~ -~ '-···~ ~-~--I I "., ~~ I' ·.,, r-~~ ~ ·-l<::::. ':::_...,_ ~~ I I ' ::;-r=:::..."" r::::::->'~ ~ ;-._ r-.... :::c-I> I I i • ··L .. . ' 5 s m " ~ G w ~ re rr ffl * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [nr's] --All~. 6.0m's 1< 1.73 Vm: 5.3mls N A. 39mlsl< 'I.SSVm: 3.5 rnls NNE A: 5.3n1/sk 1.98Vm: 4.7mls E." 7.6mls\c 1.~1Vm:5.imis ESEI'.:4.8mbk I.OOVm: 4Amlo --SSEA: 4.4m'sk L~Vm. 3.9mls --SSWA:5.9miSI::"I,OOVm: 5.2ml$ --W6WA: 4.5ilVSk 1"S7Vm:4.0n1l$ WA: 4.6nllsk 2.35\lm:·tOmls NNWAS.1 nVsk: 1.&\Vm: 4.6nlfs WindPRO is deveroced DO oo r1 !illfirmarlonarnUDrTJie!S Jemesveo10ooocr1220 oaillbro Cl fiJilll 04CJ 06 Dll44 44!JJaOU40 06 rrl 44 46r:eou aiiTirJindcroo eo d. do ENE A,: a.2mts~;: 't.OOVm:7,2.mts SA. 5"7mls k l.9~Vm: Mnvs V~~WA: 5.6ml;l' J.:)2Vm:S.fJIWS