HomeMy WebLinkAboutKodiak High School Renewable Energy Analysis App
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Grant Application
AEA 10-015 Application Page 1 of 17 10/7/2009
Application Forms and Instructions
The following forms and instructions are provided to assist you in preparing your application for
a Renewable Energy Fund Grant. An electronic version of the Request for Applications (RFA)
and the forms are available online at: http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE_Fund-III.html
Grant Application
Form
GrantApp3.doc Application form in MS Word that includes an outline of
information required to submit a complete application.
Applicants should use the form to assure all information is
provided and attach additional information as required.
Application Cost
Worksheet
Costworksheet3
.doc
Summary of Cost information that should be addressed by
applicants in preparing their application.
Grant Budget
Form
GrantBudget3.d
oc
A detailed grant budget that includes a breakdown of costs by
milestone and a summary of funds available and requested to
complete the work for which funds are being requested.
Grant Budget
Form Instructions
GrantBudgetInst
ructions3.pdf
Instructions for completing the above grant budget form.
• If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application
forms for each project.
• Multiple phases for the same project may be submitted as one application.
• If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide
milestones and grant budget for completion of each phase.
• If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting
funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the
preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
• If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in
reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with
your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed.
REMINDER:
• Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act AS 40.25, and materials
submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no
statutory exemptions apply.
• All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final
recommendations are made to the legislature.
• In accordance with 3 AAC 107.630 (b) Applicants may request trade secrets or
proprietary company data be kept confidential subject to review and approval by the
Authority. If you want information is to be kept confidential the applicant must:
o Request the information be kept confidential.
o Clearly identify the information that is the trade secret or proprietary in their
application.
o Receive concurrence from the Authority that the information will be kept
confidential. If the Authority determines it is not confidential it will be treated as a
public record in accordance with AS 40.25 or returned to the applicant upon
request.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 2 of 17 10/7/2009
SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal)
Kodiak Island Borough
Type of Entity:
Local government
Mailing Address
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, AK 99615
Physical Address
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, AK 99615
Telephone
486-9301
Fax
486-9374
Email
rgifford@kodiakak.us
1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT
Name
Rick Gifford
Title
Borough Manager
Mailing Address
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, AK 99615
Telephone
486-9301
Fax
486-9374
Email
rgifford@kodiakak.us
1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your
application will be rejected.
1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box)
An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS
42.05, or
An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or
X A local government, or
A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities);
Yes
1.2.2. Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by
its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the
applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s
governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box )
Yes
1.2.3. As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and
follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant
agreement.
Yes
1.2.4. If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached
grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the
application.)
Yes
1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant
funds for the benefit of the general public.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 3 of 17 10/7/2009
SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY
This is intended to be no more than a 1-2 page overview of your project.
2.1 Project Title – (Provide a 4 to 5 word title for your project)
Kodiak High School Renewable Energy Analysis
2.2 Project Location –
Include the physical location of your project and name(s) of the community or communities that will
benefit from your project.
The project site is Kodiak High School in the City of Kodiak; in addition to the greater Kodiak
City area residents, the High School serves the Kodiak Island region.
2.3 PROJECT TYPE
Put X in boxes as appropriate
2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type
X Wind Biomass or Biofuels
Hydro, including run of river Transmission of Renewable Energy
X Geothermal, including Heat Pumps Small Natural Gas
Heat Recovery from existing sources Hydrokinetic
X Solar Storage of Renewable
Other (Describe)
2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply)
X Reconnaissance Design and Permitting
X Feasibility Construction and Commissioning
Conceptual Design
2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Provide a brief one paragraph description of your proposed project.
The Kodiak Island Borough is proposing to perform analysis or assessment to evaluate the
potential for use of alternative energy sources to supplement the use of oil in the Kodiak High
School facility. Specifically, we will investigate the potential for utilization of the following:
• Ground source heat pumps utilizing latent ground heat tapped through a closed loop
wellfield and distributed throughout the building via conventional heat pumps;
• Site generated wind power;
• Photovoltaic power generation;
• Solar heat and power generation in conjunction with daylighting.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 4 of 17 10/7/2009
2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT
Briefly discuss the financial and public benefits that will result from this project, (such as reduced fuel
costs, lower energy costs, etc.)
The Kodiak High School is truly a community use facility. The facility houses the high school
education and sports programs, regional education programs, community recreation programs, is
designated as a tsunami shelter, houses the community Arts Program, and hosts community
functions that include meetings and gatherings of local, regional, and state organizations.
A renovation and expansion project at the Kodiak High School provides an opportunity to
investigate the potential for renewable energy resources that will provide alternatives or
supplements to oil use and for incorporating those resources into the daily operation of the
facility. The resulting public benefit will include:
• The primary benefit of this energy assessment will be information
o An assessment will definitively answer questions regarding the possibility of
utilizing renewable energy resources to ensure sustainability in the renovation and
expansion of the high school facility.
o The assessment at the high school site, in the middle of Kodiak City, will provide
information to residents regarding what renewable resources can be utilized and
may provide cost benefit to them in their own homes and businesses in the
surrounding community.
• In the long run, if renewable energy resources are found to be feasible and viable, then
savings can be achieved from reduced fuel and power costs in the Kodiak High School
which will be passed along to the taxpayers who ultimately pay for the operation of the
facility.
• The investigation into the use of renewable energy will have an impact on students; they
will know that the options for using renewable energy were investigated; they will know
that effort was made to build a sustainable facility; they will know that the effort was
made to provide a healthy learning environment that reduces the impact on the greater
environment. The Borough will have modeled practices that address environmental and
financial concerns for the future of the community.
2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW
Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source
of other contributions to the project.
The funds required for our proposed alternative energy analysis are as shown in the attached
spread sheet and total $317,190. We anticipate utilizing Kodiak Island Borough funds allocated
for design of Kodiak High School Renovation and Expansion to pay for the BIM (Building
Information Model) of the existing campus buildings as described in the Scope of Work
document attached to this application, solicitation and travel expenses estimated at: $129,440.
We have attached the Reconnaissance and Feasibility pages of the Grant Budget Form which
describe how these costs were generated. These are the only pages of the Form that apply to this
application. The KIB will determine how to fund construction of the preferred option once it is
decided upon. An option that relates directly to the construction of their proposed renovated
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 5 of 17 10/7/2009
High School will be incorporated into their construction budget. Alternative funding sources
will be investigated if an option is selected that adds considerably to the construction cost of the
High School.
2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY
Include a summary of grant request and your project’s total costs and benefits below.
Grant Costs
(Summary of funds requested)
2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $187,750
2.7.2 Other Funds to be provided (Project match) $129,440
2.7.3 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 and 2.7.2) $317,190
Project Costs & Benefits
(Summary of total project costs including work to date and future cost estimates to get to a fully
operational project)
2.7.4 Total Project Cost (Summary from Cost Worksheet
including estimates through construction)
$ see note below
2.7.5 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $
2.7.6 Other Public Benefit (If you can calculate the benefit in
terms of dollars please provide that number here and
explain how you calculated that number in your application
(Section 5.)
$
We included the grant costs in this section, including both requested grant funds as well as the
cash contributed by KIB. However, we cannot provide the Project Cost and Benefits because
they are not known at this time and will not be known until the analysis is complete and the
preferred alternative energy source determined. It is the intention of this project to evaluate
GSHP, wind, solar heat and photovoltaic energy sources, each of which will have their own cost
benefit scenario. A preferred alternative will be selected by the Borough that yields the most
benefit and can be funded.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 6 of 17 10/7/2009
SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully
completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application.
3.1 Project Manager
Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include a resume and references
for the manager(s). If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to
solicit project management support. If the applicant expects project management assistance
from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section.
The project manager for this project will be Kodiak Island Borough Project Manager/Inspector
Ken Smith, P.E.
3.2 Project Schedule
Include a schedule for the proposed work that will be funded by this grant. (You may include a
chart or table attachment with a summary of dates below.)
The following is our proposed schedule. The tasks and work items shown are included in the
Scope of Work document included in the appendix. Where the work is to be funded by the KIB
it will be so indicated, otherwise work is proposed to be funded through this grant:
February 2010: (KIB Funded) KIB will select design team to accomplish the renovation and
addition of Kodiak High School. Selection will be qualifications based selection using standard
EED approved selection criteria. The design team will include architectural, structural, civil,
mechanical, electrical, cost and energy usage consultants. The design team will integrate the
alternative energy design and analysis proposed in this application into the High School design
process. This will ensure that the proposed options can be evaluated for integration into the new
facility.
March 2010 to July 2010: (KIB Funded) Baseline Information: The design phase of the new
high school addition and renovation will include development of a BIM model of the existing
school facilities, which will be used as a tool for energy usage modeling. This effort will also
include determining heat loads in the buildings, existing and anticipated power demands and
other baseline data that will be used to compare the efficacy of the proposed alternatives.
July to August 2010: Grant Evaluation and Start up: This period of time is allocated for
finalizing the grant agreement and obtaining the necessary authorizations. It is assumed that if
this proposal is awarded a grant for funding that there will be some period of time needed for
such start up activities. In addition, if this application is not funded, this time will be used by the
KIB to determine if they will somehow proceed alone, find some other source of funding, or
modify the scope of work to fit funds available.
September to October, 2010: Preliminary energy options information gathering: The design
team will research the latest available information on the various alternative energy systems
included in the scope of this project. They will evaluate the likely energy either produced or
saved by the system and compare it to the energy demand information collected previously.
They will develop a life cycle cost model for each system to determine the likely optimum size
and output of each option as well as first cost and operating costs. At this point preliminary
evaluation of funding sources to implement the various energy options will begin.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 7 of 17 10/7/2009
November to December, 2010: System Testing: A pair of test borings will be drilled in the
High School campus to determine the heat exchange rate and likely recharge rate. This effort
will include drilling a 6” test hole approximately 350 feet, inserting a 1” diameter HDPE loop
into the boring and then backfilling it with thermal conductive grout. The loop will be charged
with a heat conductive fluid (likely water or water/glycol mix) and then circulating it through a
testing device that will record temperatures, discharge and recharge rates. This data will be
evaluated to determine actual available ground source heat usable in a building conditioning
system. If determined feasible, additional test apparatus will be installed to confirm potential
energy source production. This would include installation of a meteorological test tower to
begin actual wind profiling on the campus or the installation of prototype photovoltaic arrays.
January, 2011: System evaluation and selection: The results of the previous analysis, including
analysis of geothermal test wells, will be evaluated and a determination made of which
alternative energy system is most appropriate for installation on the high school campus and
integration into the design of the High School renovation and addition.
February, 2011: (KIB Funded) Design of the ground loop bore field, if it is determined to be
the preferred option, will begin if funding permits. Sources of funding for design and
construction of the preferred option will be finalized.
March 2011 to March 2012: (KIB Funded) Construction for the first phase of the new
Kodiak High School addition and renovation is anticipated to occur between March 2011 and
March 2012. During this period, the design of the preferred energy system can be finalized and
incorporated into the construction. In particular, if the ground source loop field option is
selected, it can be incorporated into the early site work owing to the early start on design
anticipated in this schedule.
3.3 Project Milestones
Define key tasks and decision points in your project and a schedule for achieving them. The
Milestones must also be included on your budget worksheet to demonstrate how you propose to
manage the project cash flow. (See Section 2 of the RFA or the Budget Form.)
Reconnaissance Phase:
February 2010: Project scoping and design team selection
March to July 2010: Resource Identification and Analysis
Land Use Permitting and Environmental Analysis
Cost of Energy and Market Analysis
August 2010: Grant determination and start up
September 2010: Preliminary design analysis and cost
Reconnaissance report and recommendations
Feasibility Phase:
September 2010: Solicitation and selection of test boring contractor
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 8 of 17 10/7/2009
October 2010: Identification of land and regulatory issues
Permitting and environmental analysis
November to Dec 2010: Detailed energy resource analysis and test bores
January 2011: Detailed analysis, existing & future energy costs, markets
Assessment of alternatives
Conceptual design analysis and cost estimate
Detailed economic and financial analysis
Conceptual operations plans
Final report and recommendation
3.4 Project Resources
Describe the personnel, contractors, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the
project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will
be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process
you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references
for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an attachment to your application.
Kodiak Island Borough will provide project management and oversight of the project. Selection
of a contractor to perform the assessment will be accomplished according to procurement
provisions of the Borough Code.
3.5 Project Communications
Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status.
The Kodiak Island Borough will monitor the project via an in-house project manager and will
provide regular project reporting regarding progress and financial activities according to the
requirements of the granting agency.
3.6 Project Risk
Discuss potential problems and how you would address them.
The following are some of the potential challenges and how they would be addressed:
Land use issues: The entire project area is owned by the Kodiak Island Borough. The systems
proposed are not prohibited on the site by local ordinance, as long as they stay within required
setbacks. One possible exception would be height of wind turbines, which must be coordinated
with FAA requirements and potentially illuminated as required for aircraft traffic.
Funding: The KIB is committed to funding at least the baseline information gathering and
potentially other analysis as the information is directly adaptable and of value to the ongoing
High School renovation and addition. The KIB could potentially fund implementation directly,
depending on how directly it is applicable to the conventional construction at the High School.
For instance, a photovoltaic system incorporated into the roof and walls, daylighting schemes,
even potentially wind turbines if they are incorporated into other work already expected. For
instance, a vertical axis wind turbine could be incorporated into parking lot light poles.
However, funding for a large front end loaded capital expenditure such as a ground source loop
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 9 of 17 10/7/2009
field has not been identified and would be addressed once the costs and benefits are understood.
Weather: inclement weather could potentially affect collection of data on the site. We therefore
plan on using as much existing data as possible, such as wind profile data recently collected by
Kodiak Electrical Association for a nearby location. In addition, there are at least two
contractors on Kodiak with equipment capable of drilling the bore holes necessary for the test
wells who are well qualified to drill in virtually any weather.
Schedule: This analysis effort is being conducted in conjunction with a long term, multi phase
design and construction project that has not yet started. Adjustments of schedule should be
simple to incorporate into the long range project with no penalty in efficiency.
SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS
• Tell us what the project is and how you will meet the requirements outlined in Section 2 of
the RFA.
• The level of information will vary according to phase(s) of the project you propose to
undertake with grant funds.
• If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project provide a
plan and grant budget form for completion of each phase.
• If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for
an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases
are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
4.1 Proposed Energy Resource
Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available.
Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be
available for the market to be served by your project.
An analysis will be performed to optimize the building energy systems (envelope, mechanical,
electrical). This analysis, which is granted by the proposer, will reduce the building’s energy
footprint and provide a computer energy model for evaluating alternative energy systems.
The benefit of optimizing the building energy systems will be reduced energy requirements. It
will also increase the percentage that alternative energy contributes to total energy consumption.
The geothermal potential of the site will be assessed by drilling two 350’ deep boreholes,
installing a 1” HDPE pipe loop in each bore, and backfilling grout. A thermal conductivity test
will be performed to determine the conductance and diffusivity of the underlying rock. This
information will be used to determine the size and geothermal heat production of a loopfield on
the site.
The wind generation potential of the site will be assessed by analyzing wind data from a weather
station that is currently located a few blocks from the site. The Kodiak Electric Association has
three wind turbines on the ridge above town. Data on the availability of wind power at that site
will be used to correlate the wind speed with actual turbine output.
The solar heat and power potential of the site will be assessed using data contained in the Solar
Design Manual for Alaska, local weather station data, and other local data sources.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 10 of 17 10/7/2009
Heat supplied by a ground source heat pump system will be derived from the ground (50%) and
from electricity to power the heat pump compressors (50%). A ground source heat pump system
will shift some of the building heating load from fuel oil to the electric grid.
4.2 Existing Energy System
4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System
Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about
the number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation.
The high school is currently heated by an oil-fired boiler plant that distributes hydronic heating
water to the campus buildings. The boiler plant at the Kodiak High School dates from the 1960’s
and consists of three large fuel oil fired boilers that serve the entire campus, including the newly
constructed swimming pool building. Total area of the campus buildings is anticipated to be
approximately 145,000 sf at completion of the planned renovation and addition. The existing
physical plant is obsolete and must be replaced. It is anticipated that the existing hydronic piping
system as well as air handlers campus wide will be replaced. As exterior window and wall
assemblies will be replaced, this is thus the ideal time to consider a broad range of alternative
energy sources due to the flexibility to implement them.
Electric power is supplied by Kodiak Electric Association. The power generation sources are
currently 80% hydroelectric, 9% wind, and 11% diesel.
4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used
Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of
any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources.
Fuel oil will be an available heating energy for the life of the project. The price of fuel oil will be
determined by world supply and demand dynamics. Wide price fluctuations that occurred over
the past four years are likely to continue into the future. An upward trend in prices is expected
likely at 6% per year, which was the inflation rate from 1992 to 2005. The project will have an
insignificant effect on world oil prices and supply.
The Kodiak Electric Association has a goal to increase the amount of renewable power generation
to 95% in 2020. A higher percentage of renewable generation will stabilize rates from fuel oil
inflation. Converting to ground source heat pumps will shift heating loads from fuel oil to 95%
renewable power. Utilizing solar and wind energy will further decrease fuel oil and electricity
use.
4.2.3 Existing Energy Market
Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy
customers.
The project will reduce fuel oil use with no discernable effect on world oil markets.
A ground source heat pump system will increase electricity consumption. The added load will be
partly supplied by diesel generation, resulting in an incremental increase in electric rates.
The solar and wind energy systems will reduce both fuel oil and electricity use. These reductions
will have minimal impact on energy customers.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 11 of 17 10/7/2009
A ground source heat pump system will extract heat from the ground with no discernable effect.
4.3 Proposed System
Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address
potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues.
4.3.1 System Design
Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:
• A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location
• Optimum installed capacity
• Anticipated capacity factor
• Anticipated annual generation
• Anticipated barriers
• Basic integration concept
• Delivery methods
A feasibility analysis will be performed to assess the life cycle cost of alternative energy systems
for the building. The recommendations will be used by the design team to integrate alternative
energy systems into the building design.
Task 1: Baseline Information Gathering
1. Develop Building Energy Analysis Model of the existing school buildings for use in
describing what power is distributed through the building, where and how it is
consumed.
2. Determine heating loads in the existing buildings, including the new pool building, the
existing high school components and the proposed new additions.
3. Determine the electrical power demand on the campus overall, and required for the
pool, existing high school components and the proposed new additions.
Task 2: Geothermal Analysis
1. Thermal Conductivity Test: Drill two boreholes approx 350 feet deep and perform
conductivity tests to determine the ground thermal conductivity for use in sizing a
geothermal loopfield. The loopfield layout will optimize the available land area to
determine the maximum connected capacity of a ground source heat pump system.
2. Evaluate the mechanical systems available to utilize the potential heat. Preliminary
options include water-to-water heat pumps to heat the pool and domestic hot water and
water-to-air heat pumps to heat the spaces.
3. Determine optimal loopfield size and other physical plant components.
4. Perform life cycle cost analysis to determine the optimum heating system for the
buildings.
5. Prepare cost estimate of proposed system.
Task 3: Wind Generation Analysis
1. Gather available wind data for the site including existing KEA data for Near Island
Bridge site (Fred Zharoff Bridge).
2. Evaluate existing data.
3. Augment existing data by collecting additional data as required to evaluate system
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 12 of 17 10/7/2009
options, including installation of meteorological test tower on the existing school site.
4. Evaluate various wind power generation technologies and systems, compare likely
power costs and yields and select a preferred system. Preliminary options include
locating vertical axis turbines on the parking lot lighting poles or on the roof.
5. Perform a life cycle cost analysis to determine if the preferred system offers a life
cycle savings.
6. Prepare a cost estimate to implement the preferred system.
Task 4: Solar Heat
1. Collect existing data for potential solar heat gain.
2. Identify existing technologies and methods for capturing available solar heat to
augment or reduce reliance on other heating methods. Preliminary options include
solar hot water heating and taking advantage of solar heat gain through highly
insulated windows (R-10+) to heat the building and provide daylighting.
3. Perform life cycle cost analysis to determine if solar heating methods are cost effective
4. Prepare a cost estimate for the system if it offers a life cycle savings.
Task 5: Solar Power Generation
1. Evaluate existing data on potential sunlight available for photovoltaic and other direct
solar power generation systems.
2. Identify existing technologies and methods for capturing available solar power to
augment or reduce reliance on other energy generation methods.
3. Perform a life cycle cost analysis to determine if solar heating methods are cost
effective.
4. Prepare a cost estimate for system if it is determined to be cost effective.
Task 6: Summarize and compare alternative power sources
1. Compare the life cycle cost savings of each system evaluated.
2. Compare levels of effort necessary to implement, manage and maintain the various
alternative power generation systems, and determine a preferred option.
3. Evaluate the potential to expand the preferred option to other areas of the community.
4.3.2 Land Ownership
Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the
project or how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues.
The Kodiak Island Borough is the owner of the site.
4.3.3 Permits
Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address
outstanding permit issues.
• List of applicable permits
• Anticipated permitting timeline
• Identify and discussion of potential barriers
No permits are required for installing a geothermal loopfield or any of the other alternative energy
systems. Should there be a need for a tower for data collection that is greater than 25 feet high
during the assessment process, a variance permit from the Kodiak Island Borough will be
required. The permit process is approximately 2 months.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 13 of 17 10/7/2009
4.3.4 Environmental
Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will
be addressed:
• Threatened or Endangered species
• Habitat issues
• Wetlands and other protected areas
• Archaeological and historical resources
• Land development constraints
• Telecommunications interference
• Aviation considerations
• Visual, aesthetics impacts
• Identify and discuss other potential barriers
There are no anticipated environmental or land use issues in relation to local code expected in the
assessment process. Not addressed in local code are visual, aesthetic impacts; however no
negative visual or aesthetic impacts are likely to occur as a result of this study. The work would
be conducted in conjunction with the design of High School addition and renovation which will
allow integration of solar based elements into the design of the building and can actually become
a desirable feature. The ground loop system is completely buried and would not be apparent.
Wind turbine configuration is anticipated to be limited to vertical axis turbines that can be
integrated into parking lot light pole design or minimally obtrusive roof mounted units.
4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues
(Total Estimated Costs and Projected Revenues)
The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and
any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the
source of their cost data. For example: Applicants Records or Analysis, Industry Standards,
Consultant or Manufacturer’s estimates.
4.4.1 Project Development Cost
Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of
the project. Cost information should include the following:
• Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase
• Requested grant funding
• Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind
• Identification of other funding sources
• Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system
• Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system
The project costs will not be known until the feasibility analysis is completed.
4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs
Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by
the applicant.
(Note: Operational costs are not eligible for grant funds however grantees are required to meet
ongoing reporting requirements for the purpose of reporting impacts of projects on the
communities they serve.)
Not applicable for this phase.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 14 of 17 10/7/2009
4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale
The power purchase/sale information should include the following:
• Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s)
• Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range
• Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project
Not applicable
4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet
Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered
in evaluating the project.
The Project Cost Worksheet is attached with the following note:
This application is for an analysis of alternative energy sources useful for the Kodiak High School
Addition and Renovation. While records of past fuel and electrical consumption are known, this
information is not applicable to the alternative energy analysis. The past records apply to a
building and use capacity that cannot be compared to the planned new facility. A new swimming
pool came on line in the past two months and the existing campus will be increased by
approximately 90, 000 sf. The existing heat plant and all existing hydronic and air handling
equipment will be removed as part of the work. The analysis will thus generate estimated costs
for traditional heating systems and compare them to costs for non traditional systems. The
analysis will first give “order of magnitude” costs which can be verified with additional analysis,
or where appropriate, installation of test apparatus to compare calculated values with actual
values.
SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT
Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings,
and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project.
The benefits information should include the following:
• Potential annual fuel displacement (gal and $) over the lifetime of the evaluated
renewable energy project
• Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price,
RCA tariff, or cost based rate)
• Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits)
• Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable
energy subsidies or programs that might be available)
• Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project
It is not yet known what benefits may be provided by the use of alternative energy resources at
this site. The proposed assessment will answer these questions for potential future benefit.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 15 of 17 10/7/2009
SECTION 6– SUSTAINABILITY
Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable.
Include at a minimum:
• Proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered.
• How you propose to finance the maintenance and operations for the life of the project
• Identification of operational issues that could arise.
• A description of operational costs including on-going support for any back-up or existing
systems that may be require to continue operation
• Commitment to reporting the savings and benefits
Sustainability is not applicable in this phase of the project. Assessment will determine potential
options for use of renewable resources which can then be examined for sustainability.
SECTION 7 – READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS
Discuss what you have done to prepare for this award and how quickly you intend to proceed
with work once your grant is approved.
Tell us what you may have already accomplished on the project to date and identify other grants
that may have been previously awarded for this project and the degree you have been able to
meet the requirements of previous grants.
On October 6th, 2009 voters authorized the issuance of general obligation bonds to fund
renovation and expansion of the Kodiak High School based on a preliminary concept derived
from traditional design and construction of high school improvements. The purpose of this grant
application is to supplement the high school design by funding a detailed evaluation of alternative
energy systems that would ordinarily not be included in a traditional design services contract or
constructed in a standard construction project. If approved, the efforts included in this grant
application can be seamlessly integrated into the overall high school design and construction
project. As shown in our schedule, our scope of work is intended to work with the anticipated
schedule for these other efforts.
Because the project was recently approved, there are no previous grant awards or accomplished
work to report.
SECTION 8– LOCAL SUPORT
Discuss what local support or possible opposition there may be regarding your project. Include
letters of support from the community that would benefit from this project.
Support includes citizens concerned with taking advantage of the opportunity to incorporate
energy efficiency, sustainability, and “green” building practices into the Kodiak High School
expansion and renovation project.
Possible opposition includes taxpayer concerns regarding the cost to the public. While renewable
energy resources may create savings over time, there are many who are concerned about the
immediate cost of initiating the use of the technology required for utilizing renewable energy and
that the high school renovation and expansion project not overrun the budget for that purpose.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 16 of 17 10/7/2009
SECTION 9 – GRANT BUDGET
Tell us how much you want in grant funds Include any investments to date and funding sources,
how much is being requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an
applicant.
Include an estimate of budget costs by milestones using the form – GrantBudget3.doc
The Kodiak Island Borough is requesting grant funds in the amount of $187,750 and providing
matching funds in the amount of 129,440 for a total budget of $317,190 to perform an evaluation
of geothermal, on-site wind, and solar/photovoltaic power generation potential at the Kodiak
High School per the scope of work attached. The Kodiak Island Borough is providing matching
funds from the design budget for the Kodiak High School Renovation and Expansion project, a
project being financed with recent voter approval of approximately $76,000,000 in general
obligation bonds.
Kodiak Island Borough
Kodiak High School Energy Analysis
Scope of Work
This scope is intended to describe all major tasks that would be funded by the granting agency,
Alaska Energy Authority. Please review and comment as appropriate.
Task 1: Baseline Information gathering
1. Develop Building Energy Analysis Model of the existing school buildings for
use in describing what power is distributed through the building, where and
how it is consumed.
2. Determine heating loads in the existing buildings, including the new pool
building, the existing high school components and the proposed new
additions.
3. Determine the electrical power demand on the campus overall, and required
for the pool, existing high school components and the proposed new
additions.
Task 2: Geothermal Analysis
1. Drill two boreholes approx 350 feet deep and perform conductivity tests to
determine the ground thermal conductivity for use in sizing a geothermal
loopfield.
2. Evaluate the mechanical systems available to utilize the potential heat.
3. Determine optimal loopfield size and other physical plant components.
4. Perform life cycle cost analysis to determine the optimum heating system for
the buildings.
5. Prepare cost estimate of proposed system.
Task 3: Wind Generation Analysis
1. Gather available wind data for the site including existing KEA data for Near
Island Bridge site (Fred Zharoff Bridge).
2. Evaluate existing data
3. Augment existing data by collecting additional data as required to evaluate
system options, including installation of meteorological test tower on the
existing school site.
4. Evaluate various wind power generation technologies and systems, compare
likely power costs and yields and select a preferred system
5. Perform a life cycle cost analysis to determine if the preferred system offers a
life cycle savings.
6. Prepare a cost estimate to implement the preferred system.
Task 4: Solar Heat
1. Collect existing data for potential solar heat gain
2. Identify existing technologies and methods for capturing available solar heat
to augment or reduce reliance on other heating methods
3. Perform life cycle cost analysis to determine if solar heating methods are cost
effective
4. Prepare a cost estimate for the system if it offers a life cycle savings.
Task 5: Solar Power Generation
1. Evaluate existing data on potential sunlight available for photovoltaic and
other direct solar power generation systems.
2. Identify existing technologies and methods for capturing available solar
power to augment or reduce reliance on other energy generation methods
3. Perform a life cycle cost analysis to determine if solar heating methods are
cost effective.
4. Prepare a cost estimate for system if it is determined to be cost effective.
Task 6: Summarize and compare alternative power sources
1. Compare the life cycle cost savings of each system evaluated
2. Compare levels of effort necessary to implement, manage and maintain the
various alternative power generation systems, and determine a preferred
option
3. Evaluate the potential to expand the preferred option to other areas of the
community
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Project Cost/Benefit Worksheet
RFA AEA10-015 Application Cost Worksheet Page 1 10-7-09
Please note that some fields might not be applicable for all technologies or all project
phases. The level of information detail varies according to phase requirements.
1. Renewable Energy Source
The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a
sustainable basis.
Annual average resource availability. Not known
Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel)
2. Existing Energy Generation and Usage
a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt 1 grid, leave this section blank)
i. Number of generators/boilers/other Not Yet Known
ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other
iii. Generator/boilers/other type
iv. Age of generators/boilers/other
v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other
b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Annual O&M cost for labor Not Yet Known
ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor
c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the
Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Electricity [kWh] Not Yet Known
ii. Fuel usage
Diesel [gal]
Other
iii. Peak Load
iv. Average Load
v. Minimum Load
vi. Efficiency
vii. Future trends
d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable)
i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] Not Yet Known
ii. Electricity [kWh]
iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu]
iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu]
v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons]
vi. Other
1 The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden Valley Electric
Association, the City of Seward Electric Department, Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage Municipal Light and Power.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Project Cost/Benefit Worksheet
RFA AEA10-015 Application Cost Worksheet Page 2 10-7-09
3. Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage
(Include any projections for continued use of non-renewable fuels)
a) Proposed renewable capacity
(Wind, Hydro, Biomass, other)
[kWh or MMBtu/hr]
Not yet known
b) Proposed Annual electricity or heat production (fill in as applicable)
i. Electricity [kWh]
ii. Heat [MMBtu]
c) Proposed Annual fuel Usage (fill in as applicable)
i. Propane [gal or MMBtu]
ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu]
iii. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons]
iv. Other
4. Project Cost
a) Total capital cost of new system Not yet known
b) Development cost
c) Annual O&M cost of new system
d) Annual fuel cost
5. Project Benefits
a) Amount of fuel displaced for
i. Electricity Not yet known
ii. Heat
iii. Transportation
b) Price of displaced fuel
c) Other economic benefits
d) Amount of Alaska public benefits
6. Power Purchase/Sales Price
a) Price for power purchase/sale N/A
7. Project Analysis
a) Basic Economic Analysis
Project benefit/cost ratio Not yet known
Payback
Renewable Energy Fund Grant Round III Reconnaissance Phase 10-7-09 Reconnaissance Milestone or Task Anticipated Completion Date RE- Fund Grant Funds Grantee Matching Funds Source of Matching Funds: Cash/In-kind/Federal Grants/Other State Grants/Other TOTALS Project scoping and contractor solicitation March 1, 2010 $ $10,000 Cash $10,000 BIM modeling July 1, 2010 $ $108,440 Cash $108,440 Cost of energy and market analysis July 15, 2010 $6350 $ $6,350 Resource identification and analysis July 30, 2010 $6350 $ $6,350 Land use permitting and environmental analysis July 30, 2010 $6350 $ $6,350 Preliminary design analysis and cost Sept 1, 2010 $6350 $ $6,350 Simple economic analysis Sept 15, 2010 $6350 $ $6,350 Final Reconnaissance report and recommendations Sept 30, 2010 $6350 $ $6,350 $ $ $ $ TOTALS $38,100 118,440 $156,540 Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $ $10,000 Cash $10,000 Travel & Per Diem $ $10,000 Cash $10,000 Equipment $ $ $ Materials & Supplies $ $ $ Contractual Services $38,100 $98,440 Cash $136,540 Construction Services $ $ $ Other $ $ $ TOTALS $38,100 $118,440 $156,540
Renewable Energy Fund Grant Round III Feasibility Phase 10-7-09 Feasibility Milestone or Task Anticipated Completion Date RE- Fund Grant Funds Grantee Matching Funds Source of Matching Funds: Cash/In-kind/Federal Grants/Other State Grants/Other TOTALS Project Scoping and Solicitation Sept 30, 2010 $8,675 $5,000 Cash $13,675 Identification of land and regulatory issues Oct 15, 2010 $8,675 $ $8,675 Permitting and environmental analysis Oct 30, 2010 $8,675 $ $8,675 Detailed energy resource analysis December 21, 2010 $71,560 $ $71,560 Detailed analysis of energy costs and markets Jan 5, 2011 $8,675 $2,000 Cash $10,675 Assessment of alternatives Jan 5, 2011 $8,675 $ $8,675 Conceptual design analysis and cost estimate Jan 15, 2011 $8,675 $2,000 Cash $10,675 Detailed economic and financial analysis Jan 15, 2011 $8,675 $ $8,675 Conceptual operating plans Jan 15, 2011 $8,675 $ $8,675 Final Report and Recommendations Jan 30, 2011 $8,675 $2,000 Cash $10,675 TOTALS $149,650 11,000 $160,650 Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $ $5,000 Cash $5,000 Travel & Per Diem $ $6,000 Cash $6,000 Equipment $ $ $ Materials & Supplies $ $ $ Contractual Services $78,090 $ $78,090 Construction Services $71,560 $ $71,560 Other $ $ $ TOTALS $149,650 $11,000 $160,650 Applications should include a separate worksheet for each project phase (Reconnaissance, Feasibility, Design and Permitting, and Construction)- Add additional pages as needed
1 Introducedby Manager Gifford
Requested by KIBAssembly
2 Draftedby GrantWriter
3 Christiansen
4 Introducedon 11052009
5 Amendedon 11052009
Adoptedon 11052009
6
7 KODIAKISLANDBOROUGH
8 RESOLUTION NO FY201017
9
10 A RESOLUTIONOFTHE ASSEMBLYOFTHE KODIAK ISLANDBOROUGHAUTHORIZING
11 THESUBMISSION OFA GRANTAPPLICATION TOTHE ALASKAENERGY AUTHORITY
12 RENEWABLE ENERGYFUNDGRANTRECOMMENDATION PROGRAMROUNDIII FOR A
13 RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ANDFEASIBILITYSTUDY FORTHEUSE OFRENEWABLE
14 ENERGYRESOURCESIN THEKODIAK HIGH SCHOOL
15
16 WHEREAS On October 6 2009votersauthorized the Kodiak Island Borough to issuegeneral
17 obligationbondstofinance the renovation andexpansionof the KodiakHighSchooland
18
19 WHEREAS staffis movingforward withtheplanningphase oftherenovation andexpansion
20 projectand
21
22 WHEREAS it isinthebestinterestof thecommunityto explorethefeasibility ofemploying
23 alternativeenergyuse inthehighschoolaspartof therenovation andexpansionprojectinorder
24 toreducethecostofenergy whichwillprovideTongtermsavingsto taxpayers andreducethe
25 harmfuleffectsof energy useontheenvironment and
26
27 WHEREAS theAlaskaEnergyAuthorityhasannounced theRenewable EnergyFundGrant
28 RecommendationProgramRound III whichincludesfundingforreconnaissanceandfeasibility
29 studiesforuseofrenewableresources and
30
31 WHEREAS theKodiakIslandBorough will providematching fundstowardthis projectinthe
32 formof inkind contributionwithinthe project budget
33
34 NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED BY THEASSEMBLYOFTHE KODIAKISLAND
35 BOROUGHthat anapplicationbe submittedtothe Alaska EnergyAuthorityRenewableEnergy
36 FundGrant Recommendation ProgramRoundIII forresource assessment andfeasibility
37 analysesof thepotential useof therenewableenergy resourcesinthe KodiakHigh School
38 BE ITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheBoroughManageris authorizedtonegotiate andexecute
39 anyandall documentsrequiredforgrantingand managingfundsonbehalfof the KodiakIsland
40 Borough
41
42
43
44
KodiakIslandBorough ResolutionNo FY201017
Page 1of 2
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54 ATTEST
55
56
57
58
ADOPTED BY THEASSEMBLYOFTHEKODIAKISLANDBOROUGH
THISFIFTHDAYOFNOVEMBER 2009
NovaMJavierMMCB
i
roughClerk
KODIAKISLAND BOROUGH
Jero eMSelbyBor
KodiakIslandBorough ResolutionNoFY2010 17
Page2of 2
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
SUMMARY
Project: KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
SERVICES FEE TYPE EXPENSES TAX TOTAL
Task 1 BIM Modelling $97,440 Lump sum $0 $97,440
Task 1 $38,104 Lump sum $0 $38,104
Task 2 $18,720 Lump sum $0 $18,720
Task 2 Test Boring $58,320 Lump sum $58,320
Task 3 $9,490 Lump sum $0 $9,490
Task 3 Test Tower $13,240 Lump sum $0 $13,240
Task 4 $17,540 Lump sum $0 $17,540
Task 5 $15,620 Lump sum $0 $15,620
Task 6 $16,720 Lump Sum $0 $16,720
TOTAL $285,194
energy analysis fee.xls-SUM 3 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 1 BIM MODELING
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 8
Disc Coor/Doc Review 8 24
BIM model of exist bldg 20 240
Consultant Coordination 24 24
Subtotal (hours) 60 00002880 348
Subtotal (dollars) $8,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,040 $0 $31,440
CONSULTANTS:
Structural Engineering BIM $20,000
Mechanical Engineering BIM $20,000
Electrical Engineering BIM $20,000
Subtotal $60,000
Overhead/Profit 10%$6,000
Total $66,000
TOTAL PRE-DESIGN SERVICES FEE $97,440
energy analysis fee.xls-Task 1 BIM 5 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 1 BASELINE INFORMATION GATHERING
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 10
Agency coordination 16
Report and recommendations 24
Subtotal (hours) 50 000000 50
Subtotal (dollars) $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
CONSULTANTS:
Energy consultant $24,276
Mechanical Engineering $2,000
Electrical Engineering $2,000
Subtotal $28,276
Overhead/Profit 10%$2,828
Total $31,104
TOTAL TASK 1 SERVICES FEE $38,104
energy analysis fee.xls-task 1 6 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 2 GEOTHERMAL ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Consultant coordination 4
Subtotal (hours)8000000 8
Subtotal (dollars) $1,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,120
CONSULTANTS:
energy engineering $12,000
Electrical Engineering $1,000
Mechanical Engineer $1,000
civil engineer $2,000
Subtotal $16,000
Overhead/Profit 10%$1,600
Total $17,600
TOTAL TASK 2 SERVICES FEE $18,720
energy analysis fee.xls-task 2 analysis 7 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 2 GEOTHERMAL ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Consultant coordination 4
Subtotal (hours)8000000 8
Subtotal (dollars) $1,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,120
CONSULTANTS:
two boreholes 350 ft ea $24,500
partial borehole casing $2,000
1" loop and grout backfill $10,500
Thermal conductivity tests $5,000
Misc well test expensen $10,000
Subtotal $52,000
Overhead/Profit 10%$5,200
Total $57,200
TOTAL TASK 2 SERVICES FEE $58,320
energy analysis fee.xls-task 2 test boring 8 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 3 WIND GENERATION ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Consultant coordination 4
agnecy coordination 4
Subtotal (hours) 12 000000 12
Subtotal (dollars) $1,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,680
CONSULTANTS:
Structural Engineering $1,000
Energy Engineering $5,100
Electrical Engineering $1,000
Subtotal $7,100
Overhead/Profit 10%$710
Total $7,810
TOTAL TASK 3 SERVICES FEE $9,490
energy analysis fee.xls-task 3 9 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 3 WIND GENERATION ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Consultant coordination 4
agnecy coordination 8
Subtotal (hours) 16 000000 16
Subtotal (dollars) $2,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,240
CONSULTANTS:
Meterological Test Tower $10,000
Subtotal $10,000
Overhead/Profit 10%$1,000
Total $11,000
TOTAL TASK 3 SERVICES FEE $13,240
energy analysis fee.xls-task 3 test tower 10 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 4 SOLAR HEAT ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Consultant coordination 8
conceptual design 16 40
Product Research 8
Subtotal (hours) 36 40 00000 76
Subtotal (dollars) $5,040 $4,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,840
CONSULTANTS:
Mechanical Engineering $1,000
Electrical Engineering $1,000
Energy Engineering $5,000
Subtotal $7,000
Overhead/Profit 10%$700
Total $7,700
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SERVICES FEE $17,540
energy analysis fee.xls-task 4 11 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 5 SOLAR POWER GENERATION ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Consultant Coordination 8
Conceptual Design 16 24
Product Research 8
Subtotal (hours) 36 24 00000 60
Subtotal (dollars) $5,040 $2,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,920
CONSULTANTS:
Mechanical Engineering $1,000
Electrical Engineering $1,000
Energy Engineering $5,000
Subtotal $7,000
Overhead/Profit 10%$700
Total $7,700
TOTAL BIDDING AND NEGOTIATION SERVICES FEE $15,620
energy analysis fee.xls-task 5 12 11/9/2009
JENSEN YORBA LOTT, Inc.
DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL
TASK 6 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
Project:KHS ENERGY ANALYSIS GRANT
Arch/LArch/IDes
STAFF: PMgr III II I Intern Drft AA TOTAL
$140 $120 $105 $95 $90 $80 $70
ARCHITECTURE:
Project Management 4
Cunsultant Coordination 8
Draft Analysis Report 888
Review meetings 8
Final Analysis Report 84
Subtotal (hours) 36 0008012 56
Subtotal (dollars) $5,040 $0 $0 $0 $720 $0 $840 $6,600
CONSULTANTS:
Civil Engineering 500
Structural Engineering 500
Mechanical Engineering 1000
Electrical Engineering 1000
Energy engineering 6200
Subtotal $9,200
Overhead/Profit 10%$920
Total $10,120
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FEE $16,720
energy analysis fee.xls-task 6 13 11/9/2009
Alaska Energy Engineering LLC Fee Proposal
25200 Amalga Harbor Road Tel/Fax: 907.789.1226
Juneau, Alaska 99801 alaskaenergy@earthlink.net
Kodiak Island Borough
Kodiak High School Alternative Energy Feasibility Analysis
Engineering Services Qty Unit Unit Cost Total
Task1: Baseline Information Gathering
Develop baseline energy anaysis model 240 hr $102 $24,480
Building optimization; envelope, HVAC, lighting, etc. 150 hr $102 $15,300
Determine heating loads 4 hr $102 $408
Determine electric power use and demand 4 hr $102 $408
$40,596
Task 2: Geothermal Analysis
Test boreholes
Drill two boreholes 700 lnft $35 $24,500
Casing 60 lnft $25 $1,500
Install 1" HDPE loop and backfill with groute 700 lnft $10 $7,000
Thermal conductivity test equipment 1 ea $2,000 $2,000
Borehole and thermal conductivity engineering support 40 hr $102 $4,080
GSHP System Conceptual Design and Evaluation 80 hr $102 $8,160
Loopfield optimization 8 hr $102 $816
Energy and life cycle cost analysis 40 hr $102 $4,080
Cost estimate 2 hr $102 $204
$52,340
November 5, 2009
Task 3: Wind Generation Analysis
Gather data 8 hr $102 $816
Evaluate data 8 hr $102 $816
Additional data, test tower Tony??
Evaluate wind power technologies; conceptual design 24 hr $102 $2,448
Energy and life cycle cost analysis 24 hr $102 $2,448
Cost estimate 2 hr $102 $204
$6,732
Task 4: Solar Heat
Gather and evaluate existing data 8 hr $102 $816
Evaluate solar heating technologies; conceptual design 24 hr $102 $2,448
Energy and life cycle cost analysis 60 hr $102 $6,120
Cost estimate 4 hr $102 $408
$9,792
Task 5: Solar Power Generation
Gather and evaluate existing data 8 hr $102 $816
Evaluate solar power technologies; conceptual design 24 hr $102 $2,448
Energy and life cycle cost analysis 24 hr $102 $2,448
Cost estimate 4 hr $102 $408
$6,120
1
Task 6: Comparative Summary
Comparitive analysis including sensitivity analysis 24 hr $102 $2,448
Comparative analysis of effort to own each option 16 hr $102 $1,632
Evaluate expansion of technology to community 16 hr $102 $1,632
Draft and final report 32 hr $102 $3,264
$8,976
Summary Grant Request Totals
Task1: Baseline Information Gathering $40,596
Task 2: Geothermal Analysis $52,340 $52,340
Task 3: Wind Generation Analysis $6,732 $6,732
Task 4: Solar Heat $9,792 $9,792
Task 5: Solar Power Generation $6,120 $6,120
Task 6: Comparative Summary $8,976 $8,976
Totals $83,960 $124,556
33% 67%
40,596$
Grant In-kind
40,596$
2