HomeMy WebLinkAboutSaint Paul Economy Upgrade Application
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Grant Application
AEA-10-015 – RENEWABLE ENERGY GRANT APPLICATION
SAINT PAUL FUEL ECONOMY UPGRADE PROJECT
November 9, 2009
prepared for:
City of Saint Paul Electric Utility
P.O. Box 901
Saint Paul Island, Alaska 99660
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Grant Application
AEA 10-015 Application Page i 11/9/2009
Table of Contents
Grant Application Form .................................................................. 11 pages
Resume: Linda Snow, City Manager ............................................... 3 pages
Application Cost Worksheet ............................................................. 2 pages
Grant Budget From ............................................................................ 2 pages
Letters of Support
Pribilof School District ................................................................... 1page
Saint Paul Council Resolution 09-03 ................................................. 1 page
Waste Heat Load Calculat ions
Waste Heat Piping Site Plan .......................................................... 1 page
Waste Heat Schematic ................................................................... 1 page
Waste Heat System Load Calculation ........................................... 3 page
Waste Heat Load , Bulk Fuel Office .............................................. 2 page
Waste Heat Load , Gas Station ....................................................... 2 page
Waste Heat Load , Bulk Fuel Pum p Building ............................... 2 page
Technical Support Information
Cat 3512C Specifications ............................................................. 2 pages
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Grant Application
AEA 10-015 Application Page 1of 11 11/9/2009
SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name
City of Saint Paul Electric Utility
Type of Entity: City, Electric Utility
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 901
Saint Paul Island, AK 99660
Physical Address
Saint Paul Island
Telephone
(907) 546-3113
Fax
(907) 546-3188
Email
lsnow@stpaulak.com
1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT
Name
Linda Snow
Title
City Manager
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 901
Saint Paul, AK 99660
Telephone
(907) 546-3113
Fax
(907) 546-3188
Email
lsnow@stpaulak.com
1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box)
X An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under
AS 42.05, or
An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or
X A local government, or
A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities);
Yes
1.2.2. Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its
project by its board of directors, executive management, or other
governing authority. If the applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal
approval from each participant’s governing authority is necessary. (Indicate
Yes or No in the box )
Yes
1.2.3. As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management
systems and follow procurement standards that comply with the standards
set forth in the grant agreement.
Yes
1.2.4. If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the
attached grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and
submitted with the application.)
Yes
1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with
grant funds for the benefit of the general public.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 2 of 11 11/9/2009
SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY
2.1 Project Title
Saint Paul Fuel Economy Upgrade
2.2 Project Location
The project will be constructed and operated in the City of Saint Paul Diesel Power plant within
the Fuel Farm Subdivision on Saint Paul Island. The entire community of Saint Paul Island will
benefit from this project.
2.3 PROJECT TYPE
2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type
Wind Biomass or Biofuels
Hydro, including run of river Transmission of Renewable Energy
Geothermal, including Heat
Pumps
Small Natural Gas
X Heat Recovery from existing
sources
Hydrokinetic
Solar Storage of Renewable
Other (Describe)
2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that
apply)
Reconnaissance X Design and Permitting
Feasibility X Construction and Commissioning
Conceptual Design
2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project would be constructed at the existing utility power plant and adjacent buildings. A
new low fuel consumption diesel 4,160v generator and switchgear would be installed to replace
existing older 480v inefficient diesel generator unit #2. Existing waste heat system from the
power plant would be extended by this project to provide space heat to the gas station, bulk fuel
office and bulk fuel pump house to replace existing electric baseboard heat. Increase fuel
efficiency and reduced electric heat load would benefit all existing electric customers through
lower power generation costs. New d iesel generator would reduce current high overhaul and
maintenance cost for old generator to be replaced. The City would administer the project and
contract out to qualified consultants for the final design, and contract with a qualified contractor
to install the diesel generators, switchgear and waste heat piping. The existing city workforce
would operate and maintain the new equipment.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 3 of 11 11/9/2009
2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT
The new higher efficiency 4,160kV diesel generator could be operated in parallel with existing
la rge units under high load conditions and operated by itself under low load conditions for an
estimated fuel savings of 7,800 gallons of diesel annually. The 580-foot extension of the
existing waste heat system to the remaining nearby buildings would replace existing electric
baseboard heat equivalent to 18,030 gallons of diesel annually. At the current cost of fuel of
3.45 $/gal this is an annual savings of $89,110 provided by the project. Present value of savings
over the 15 -year life of the generator would be $924,900. The public will benefit from reduced
diesel fuel consumption by the existing power plant equating to lower kwh cost of power to the
consumer. Additional uncalculated savings will be realized from reduced maintenance cost as
the engine b eing replaced is at the end of its useful life. Local jobs will be created during
construction of the waste heat system and generator installation.
2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW
The City has completed the pre-construction phase of the project to identify the equipment
required, and developed the preliminary design and construction cost estimate. The City of Saint
Paul requests grant funds to complete the project. After grant award, the City will complete the
project final design and specifications. Equip ment will be procured and contract(s) awarded for
supply and installation of switchgear, generators and waste heat piping.
Description Cost
Project Final Design & Permitting $56,019
Equipment and Supplies $346,149
Construction $213,423
Total Project C ost $615,591
In Kind Contribution $104,650
Grant Request $510,941
2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY
Grant Costs (Summary of funds requested)
2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $510,941
2.7.2 Other Funds to be provided (Project match) $104,650
2.7.3 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 and 2.7.2) $615,591
Project Costs & Benefits
2.7.4 Total Project Cost (Summary from Cost
Worksheet including estimates through
construction)
$615,591
2.7.5 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $89,1 10
2.7.6 Other Public Benefit (Section 5.) See Narrative
SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 4 of 11 11/9/2009
3.1 Project Manager
The project manager for this grant would be the City Manager Linda Snow, and the daily
administration of the grant would be by Stephanie Mandregan the City’s Grants Administrator.
The City of Saint Paul and Finance Department have administered numerous State and Federal
grants and are in good standing with all State and Federal Agencies. The City has utilized the
alternate management process with prior State Grants successfully. No assistance in project
management will be required for this project.
3.2 Project Schedule
2009 Oct.: Preliminary Design and Modeling of New Diesel Engines and Waste Heat
Extension. Completed
2010 July: Grant Award
Sept.: Final project design and specifications.
Sept.: Waste Heat pipe and fitting procurement bid.
Sept.: Waste Heat pipe installation bid.
Oct: Contractor installation of Waste Heat piping and building connections.
Oct.: Diesel generator and switchgear procurement bid.
Nov: Place new waste heat system in operation.
2011 Apr.: Ship diesel generator and switchgear to Saint Paul.
Apr.: Remove existing 480v old generators
May: Install 4,160 diesel generator and switchgear
June: Start up generator and pla ce into service operation
3.3 Project Milestones
Aug 2010: Review of preliminary design package and generator selection criteria by City power
plant operations staff and administration to ensure meet plant requirements.
Sept 2010: Review and approval of final design package and procurement documents by city
administrator, finance director and attorney to ensure meet community requirements.
Nov 2010: Analysis of bids for supply of generator, switchgear and piping to ensure meet
specifications and recommendation for award of best value within project budget.
March 2011: Analysis of bids for installation of generator and switchgear and piping to ensure
meet project specifications and recommendation for award of best value within project budget.
June 2011: Final project inspection, commissioning and start-up.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 5 of 11 11/9/2009
3.4 Project Resources
The City is planning to utilize the services of the engineering team of Vector Engineering and
Polarconsult Alaska, Inc to prepare final project design and to assist in the preparation of the
diesel generator and waste heat procurement requests. The Polarconsult/Vector team will
provide the technical expertise in support of the City to make this a successful project. The same
team has worked with the City on the design and construction of the existing diesel electric
power plant, electrical distribution and waste heat system. The successful diesel
generator/switchgear contractor will provide the technical experience in installation of the
equipment. Vector Engineerin g and City power plant crew have the technical experience
required to oversee the contractor installation and operational experience required for long term
project operation. The City finance department and administration has the fiscal management
and exp erience applicable to project development and operations.
3.5 Project Communications
The City will keep AEA informed of project status through monthly or quarterly project status
reports as warranted. Reports will include a brief report including narrative of current project
status, activities completed during the report period, list any problems encountered, and list
anticipated activities in the next reporting period. Report will also include budget status and
summary of current and projected costs. RFP’s and quote requests will be forwarded to AEA for
review and comment, as they are prepared.
3.6 Project Risk
Project has limited risk. Generation units have been installed successfully and have a reliable
track record and documented fuel usage curves. Factory technicians would be enlisted if
excessive fuel consumption or other generation problems are encountered.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 6 of 11 11/9/2009
SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS
4.1 Proposed Energy Resource
Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available.
Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that
may be available for the market to be served by your project.
A new power plant was constructed in 1993 and waste heat distribution connected to the public
works office and machine shop. Diesel generators and switchgear were moved from the original
power plant to the new plant site. No new diesel generators were included in the new plant.
Waste heat has been expanded to a new warehouse and fire station as they were constructed.
The proposed energy resource is diesel fuel and waste heat from the generation plant. The
proposed project reduces diesel fuel consumption through use of newer more fuel-efficient diesel
generation. The proposed project also extends the waste heat system to all adjacent buildings to
reduce space heat costs for the city bulk fuel facility which will equate to reduced incremental
fuel costs. No additional buildings are within a half -mile of the power plant to allow for
expansion of waste heat distribution.
Wind generated electric energy has not been available to the City in the past. This project will
not detract from possible future purchase of wind generated electric power if offered for sale.
4.2 Existing Energy System
4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System
The existing energy system consists of 6 Cat diesel generators, step up transformers and 7.2/12.47
kV 3 phase underground distribution system, and step down transformers to individual utilit y
customers. Annual average generation per gallon of fuel burned shown for each unit.
1. Cat 3512 855 kW 1,200 rpm 4,160v gen, 36,966 total hrs, installed 1995 Avg 14.43 kWh/gal
2. Cat 3412 600 kW 1,800 rpm 480v gen, 5,889 total hrs, installed 1993 Avg 11.64 kWh/gal
To Be Replaced with new 4,160v generator this project.
3. Cat 3406 210 kW 1,800 rpm 480v gen, 5,145 total hrs, installed 1988 Avg 12.33 kWh/gal
4. Cat 3412 300 kW 1,200 rpm 480v gen, 17,707 total hrs, installed 1991 Avg 12.31 kWh/gal
5. Cat 3512 650 kW 1,200 rpm 480v gen, 20,603 total hrs, installed 1991 Avg 12.61 kWh/gal
6. Cat 3512 855 kW 1,200 rpm 480v gen, 79,391 total hrs, installed 1991 Avg 13.26 kWh/gal
The existing distribution system was installed between 1990 and 19 94 with further extensions as
new customers have been added.
4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used
The existing utility generation is entirely from diesel generation. The new diesel engine and
switchgear would be added to the existing 4,160v switchgear bus. The impact to the existing
infrastructure will be limited. Waste Heat piping will be extended from the end of the existing
piping at the Fire Station, with a single series line through the 3 new buildings and back to the
City Machine Shop to tie into the existing system return line. No impacts to the existing system
are anticipated.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 7 of 11 11/9/2009
4.2.3 Existing Energy Market
The proposed project should only impact existing customers by reducing their monthly utility bill
through reduced power production costs.
The existing energy market is fairly stable with future possible load by adding the existing
Trident Processing plant and Icicle floating processors to the existing electric utility. Addition of
these new customers may be possible with reduced power costs. Addition of these large power
consumers that currently self generate would reduce the incremental cost of power by spreading
the base cost of electricity over additional consumers.
4.3 Proposed System
4.3.1 System Design
The proposed project will upgrade existing diesel generation with newer low fuel consumption
diesel generator and switchgear that is more fuel-efficient than existing generator being replaced.
Unit is sized to work with existing diesel generators to supply reliable electricity to the
community. The new generator will be tied into the existing waste heat distribution system that
supplies space heat to the public works office, machine shop, warehouse and fire station. The
project will extend the waste heat system to supply space heat to the remaining 3 buildings nearby
including the bulk fuel office, gas station and bulk fuel pump building.
The new generator is sized to efficiently work with existing plant generators to supply the
community load. Plant installed capacity will be 3.47 MW.
Existing plant annual generation is 5,550,000 kWh. The new generator is anticipated to generate
754,800 kWh of electricity for a plant capacity factor of 13.6%.
No barriers are anticipated in the construction of this project.
No change to existing electric power distribution system to the community is proposed.
4.3.2 Land Ownership
The entire proposed project site is within the Fuel Farm subdivision owned by the City of Saint
Paul. No other lands are required for the project.
4.3.3 Permits
A coastal zone questionnaire will be completed as part of the final design which will entail the
following requirements:
- The existing City of Saint Paul Air Quality Permit will have to be updated to
identify the new diesel generator being installed to replace the existing generator
#2 listed on their permit.
- No other permits are required for the construction of this project.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 8 of 11 11/9/2009
4.3.4 Environmental
Threatened or Endangered Species: No threatened or endangered species are found within the
project area, an existing power plant, road right of way and parking area.
Habitat: Existing project area consists of previously filled roadway and parking lot, and building
interior. This project will not change existing habitat. USFW will be consulted during project
permitting.
Wetlands: No wetlands are found in the proposed project area.
Historic and Archeological Resources: No archeological or historic resources are present in the
proposed project area. All excavation for waste heat piping will be within previously filled
parking areas and roadbeds. SHPO will be consulted during the course of the project.
Aesthetics: Project will be visible to the public during excavation for installation of waste heat
pipes only. New generator will replace an existing generator in the existing power plant.
Aviation: No impact on aviation as waste heat line buried, and new generator within existing
power plant building.
Telecommunications interference: Waste heat line will cross existing buried phone lines.
Locates will be obtained prior to construction.
4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues
4.4.1 Project Development Cost
Total project cost is $615,591. The City is supplying 17% of the project cost through cash and in
kind contributions totaling $104,651. The City is requesting $510,940 in grant funds for this
project.
Purchase and operating costs for generator and switchgear were obtained from NC Machinery and
Cat Power systems. Costs for waste heat pipe and equipment were obtained from installation of
the waste heat system extension to the fire station in 2008. Installation costs were estimated
based on prior costs expended by the City to install previous generators and switchgear in the
power plant and to install extensions of the existing wastes heat system to the fire station.
4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs
Operating and maintenance costs are estimated to be equal to existing operation and maintenance
costs for the existing diesel power plant with $233,749 labor and $1,548,550 non-labor costs.
Some reduced cost in overhauls will be achieved by replacing an old engine that has exceeded its
useful life but are not counted in the project benefit for this project. Operations and maintenance
is funded through the sale of electric power to residential, commercial and institutional customers.
No change in the revenue collection is anticipated. The anticipated reduction in the operation and
maintenance costs by this project will be reviewed for possible changes to the existing electric
tariff by the City Council.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 9 of 11 11/9/2009
4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale
No change in the number of utility customers is anticipated.
The grant project has a payback of 6.9 years with no change in the electric rate. Changes of the
electric rate equal to the grant project savings if instituted by the City Council would create a
100% rate of return to the public for the grant. Until a new tariff is enacted the actual rate of
return cannot be calculated.
4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet
See attached project cost worksheet in the end of this application.
SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT
The offset use of diesel fuel by this project is anticipated to be 7,800 gallons from electric
generation efficiency and 18,029 gallons of diesel fuel space heat.
With the current cost of diesel fuel at $3.45 per gallon this equates to a savings of $36,918 to the
utility for purchasing diesel fuel, and a savings of $62,200 to the bulk fuel and marine sales
departments of the City in annual electric heating costs. Present value of savings over the 15-year
life of the generator would be $924,900.
The new diesel generator is also anticipated to reduce the electric utility annual overhaul and
maintenance cost on generators with the introduction of a new generator to replace a unit that is
beyond its useful life. Operation of the new unit will reduce operating hours on other units in the
plant. The actual savings has not been calculated, or included in the project benefit worksheet.
The reduced cost of diesel for generation and overhead cost for supply of diesel fuel to the
community will depend on final tariff changes made by the City Council.
SECTION 6– SUSTAINABILITY
Existing operation and maintenance of the power plant are not proposed to be changed.
Existing maintenance and operations of the power plant are budgeted annually and supported
through sales of electricity.
No operational problems are anticipated. If problems arise the City works with Vector
Engineering, Polarconsult Alaska and NC Machine to troubleshoot and repair generation
equipment.
The City of Saint Paul is fully committed to annual review and summary of cost savings from this
project in contrast to historical operational costs.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 10 of 11 11/9/2009
SECTION 7 – READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS
The City has completed a feasibility analysis to review options for increased efficiency in the
existing diesel power plant. An analysis of operations with existing and proposed diesel engines
was performed to estimate fuel savings. Existing power plant is laid out to allow for installation
of new 4,160v switchgear adjacent to existing Engine #1 4,160v switchgear with conduits to
diesel generator location. Existing 480v switchgear can be abandoned in place and new
switchgear installed without effecting existing power generation.
The City of Saint Paul received grant funding for construction of distribution upgrades to allow
relocation of the power plant to the present location. Project was completed on time and on
budget. The City of Saint Paul received a power project loan for construction of the new power
plant in its present location. The project was completed on time and on budget. The City is
currently paying back the power project loan in accordance with the loan conditions.
The City of Saint Paul has successfully completed all grant projects it has received in the past and
met all grant conditions.
SECTION 8– LOCAL SUPORT
The community is in full support of the proposed project. Letters of support have been included
in this application in the appendix.
SECTION 9 – GRANT BUDGET
The total project cost is $615,591. The City has completed the feasibility and economic analysis,
and concept design for the project prior to this grant application.
The City is requesting $510,941 in grant funds for the project.
The project grant budget is attached as Appendix B.
The City will be supplying 17% of the total project cost as local match for this grant. Local
match will consist of a combination of City general funds, grant administration and oversight,
city public works crew labor and city equipment.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Grant Application
AEA 10-015 Application 11/9/2009
A. Resumes of Applicant’s Project Manager, key staff, partners,
consultants, and suppliers.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
B. Cost Worksheet per application form Section 4.4.4.
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Project Cost/Benefit Worksheet
RFA AEA10-015 Application Cost Worksheet Page 1 10-7-09
1. Renewable Energy Source
Annual average resource availability. 1,543 MMBTU
Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel)
2. Existing Energy Generation and Usage
a) Basic configuration
i. Number of generators/boilers/other 6
ii. Rated capacity of generators 3.47 MW
iii. Generator type Cat Diesel Generators
iv. Age of generators 14, 16, 21, 18, 18, 18 years old
v. Efficiency of generators 11.64 to 14.43 kWh / gal
b) Annual O&M cost
i. O&M cost for labor $233,749 / year
ii. O&M cost for non-labor $1,548,550 / year
c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage
i. Electricity [kWh] 5,537,487 last 12 mths
ii. Fuel usage
Diesel 397,800 gallons
Other
iii. Peak Load 820 kW
iv. Average Load 650 kW
v. Minimum Load 480 kW
vi. Efficiency 13.44 kW Generated per gallon of diesel fuel
vii. Future trends 13.69 kW Generated per gallon diesel fuel
d) Annual heating fuel usage
i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu]
ii. Electricity [kWh] 18,030 gallons of fuel displaced by new Waste Heat
iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu]
iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu]
v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry
tons]
vi. Other
Renewable Energy Fund Round 3
Project Cost/Benefit Worksheet
RFA AEA10-015 Application Cost Worksheet Page 2 10-7-09
3. Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage
a) Proposed renewable capacity Waste Heat available = 0.176 MMBTU/hr
b) Proposed Annual electricity or heat production
i. Electricity [kWh] 5,600,000 kWh 754,800 kWh new engine #2
ii.Heat [MMBtu] .06 MMBtu load added with waste heat extension.
c) Proposed Annual fuel Usage
i. Propane [gal or MMBtu]
ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu]
iii. Wood
iv. Other – Diesel 405,271 gallons (7,800 gallons savings)
4. Project Cost
a) Total capital cost of new system $615,591
b) Development cost
c) Annual O&M cost of new system $1,782,300
d) Annual fuel cost $1,398,186
5. Project Benefits
a) Amount of fuel displaced for
i. Electricity 7,799 gallons diesel
ii. Heat 18,030 gallons diesel
iii. Transportation
b) Price of displaced fuel $3.45
c) Other economic benefits
d) Alaska public benefits $89,110
6. Power Purchase/Sales Price
a) Price for power purchase/sale
7. Project Analysis
a) Basic Economic Analysis
Project benefit/cost ratio $924,900 / $615,591 = 1.50
Payback 6.9 years
Saint Paul Electric Utility Fuel Economy Upgrade 11/10/2009
Fuel Usage Engine Use kWh ProducedFuel Used Fuel Usage Engine Use kWh Produced Fuel Used
(kwh/gal)(kwh/gal)
Engine #1 14.43 41.27%2,290,485 158,731 14.43 41.27%2,290,485 158,731
Engine #2 11.64 5.60%310,800 26,701 14.60 13.60%754,800 51,687
Engine #3 12.33 7.68%426,240 34,569 12.33 7.68%426,240 34,569
Engine #4 12.31 8.45%468,975 38,097 12.31 10.95%607,725 49,368
Engine #5 12.61 0.50%27,750 2,201 12.61 0.00%0 0
Engine #6 13.26 36.50%2,025,750 152,771 13.26 26.50%1,470,750 110,916
Total 13.44 100.00%5,550,000 413,070 13.69 100.00%5,550,000 405,271
New Low Fuel Consumption Diesel Generator Gallons of Diesel Fuel displaced by new Generator #2 7,799 gal
Replace electric Baseboard with Waste Heat Equivalent gallons of fuel saved at Pump Building 5,060 gal
Replace electric Baseboard with Waste Heat Equivalent gallons of fuel saved at Gas Station 5,314 gal
Replace electric Baseboard with Waste Heat Equivalent gallons of fuel saved at Bulk Fuel Office 7,656 gal
Total Annual Gallons of Fuel Displaced This Project 25,829 gal
Fuel Cost per gallon $3.45
Interest 5%Annual $ Savings This Project $89,109.91
Life 15 years Present Value of Savings $924,930.36
Existing System Proposed New, This Project
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
C. Grant Budget Form per application form Section 9.
Renewable Energy Fund Grant Round III Grant Budget Form 10-7-09
Milestone or Task
Anticipated
Completion
Date
RE- Fund
Grant Funds
Grantee
Matching
Funds
Source of Matching
Funds:
Cash/In -
kind/Federal
Grants/Other State
Grants/Other
TOTALS
Air Quality Permit Modification Application September 2010 $1,660 $340 $2,000
Final System Design / Bid Documents September 2010 $44,836 $9,183 Cash $54,019
Equipment Bid and Purchase March 2011 $287,304 $58,845 Cash $346,149
Equipment Installation / Waste Heat Bid February 2011 $1,660 $340 Cash/In Kind $2,000
Equipment Installation / Waste Heat
Construction
June 2011 $173,821 $35,602 Cash/In-kind $209,423
Final Acceptance, Commissioning and Start Up June 2011 $1,660 $340 Cash/In-kind $2,000
$ $ $
$
TOTALS $510,941 $104,650 $615,591
Budget Categories:
Direct Labor & Benefits $29,091 $5,959 $35,050
Travel & Per Diem $21,123 $4,327 $25,450
Equipment $282,323 $57,825 $340,148
Materials & Supplies $6,640 $1,360 $8,000
Contractual Services $46,496 $9,523 $56,019
Construction Services $105,616 $21,632 $127,248
Other $19,651 $4,025 $23,676
TOTALS $510,940 $104,651 $615,591
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
D. Letters demonstrating local support per application form Section 8.
Pribilof School District
St. George School St. Paul School
Box 905 St. Paul Island Alaska 99660
Phone:907-546-2221 Fax:907-546-2327
November 6, 2009
Linda Snow, City Manager
City of Saint Paul
P.O. Box 901
St. Paul Island, Alaska 99660
Dear Ms. Snow:
It is my understanding the City of Saint Paul plans to submit a grant application that will
result in increased fuel efficiency in power generation and some reductions in the electric
heat load due to waste heat recovery. I am very supportive of any and all efforts the City
can make towards reducing operational costs leading to the potential reductions in the
cost of electricity. For example, the City has been successful in using grant funds to
implement a pilot project using the AMPY pay-as-you-go metering system in over 60
residential homes. This is an excellent project targeted at allowing the customer much
more knowledge and control of their own electrical use, thereby reducing electrical
demand.
Although I realize that electric rates on St. Paul Island fall in the middle ground between
many other Power Cost Equalization (PCE) recipients, I know the community can benefit
from greater efficiencies in the generation of electrical power. I am aware that
technological advancements have been made in diesel generators, and there is every
reason why the communities who are dependent upon diesel generated power should
benefit from new technology.
The Pribilof School District currently spends $120,920/yr on electrical costs. With the
potential savings the City could realize by replacing one of their existing diesel
generators to a lower fuel consumption diesel generator, these savings can be passed
on to its customers. The District has limited funding, based on student population. With
declining enrollment and energy costs being what they are, we may have no alternative
but to cut staffing. If energy savings is realized we can maintain status quo and continue
to provide our students with the best quality education possible.
Thank you for your continued efforts toward reducing the cost of living on St. Paul.
Sincerely,
Sherry Lestenkof
School Board President
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
E. Governing Body Resolution or other formal action taken by the
applicant’s governing body or management per RFA Section 1.4.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
F. Waste Heat System plan and piping schematic drawing.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
G. Waste Heat load calculations.
wh.XLSWASTE HEAT UTILIZATION SIMULATION WORK SHEET -Concept:1 Mach Shop Saint Paul 11/10/2009
Location:Saint Paul 11:55 AM
Date:Nov-09 GENERATOR DATA:Cat 3512, 1200 RPM Output Heat To Heat To
SYSTEM LOSS DATA: Flow Rate 370 gpm kw Coolant Ambient 100%
Constant losses: Heat rate at kw-load above:0 6,684 10,272 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Plant piping:0 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:177.4 6,684 10,272 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Subsurface piping:29,239 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:354.8 3,916 6,049 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Engine preheating:0 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:532.2 2,754 4,543 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Total constant:29,239 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:709.6 2,390 4,224 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Variable losses: Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Surface piping:50 Btu/hr.xF Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Plant heating:1,791 Btu/hr.xF Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Radiator losses:75 Btu/hr.xF Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH)
Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual
GENERATION DATA:Kwh/Mth:626,899 866,660 369,541 461,926 475,123 417,968 624,700 464,125 457,526 477,323 512,518 554,311 11,178
WEATHER DATA:HDD/Mth:1,200 1,207 1,293 1,119 936 723 598 543 615 849 951 1,144 0
BUILDING DATA:Pipe Pipe Heat Pipe
Fuel use,Non-In Boiler Dist.Dia.Loss Loss
gallons Seasonal Seasonal Use ?Effic.(FT)(IN)(Btu/Ft)(GAL/YR)
Mach Shop 18,459 0 1 0.73 264 3.00 19.42 199
Maint Shop 7,940 0 1 0.73 164 3.00 19.42 177
Fire Station 6,944 0 1 0.73 200 2.0 18.33 405
Warehouse 15,000 0 1 0.73 70 3.0 19.42 1,188
Fuel Office 900 0 1 0.73 70 2.0 18.33 51,340
Building in use; 1=yes, 0=no
Assumed Diurnal Heat Power Plant Production & Hourly Variation
Demand Variation:
Winter Summer Hour:Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
0.039 0.039 1 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.038 0.038
0.038 0.038 2 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.036 0.036
0.038 0.038 3 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.034 0.034
0.038 0.038 4 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034
0.038 0.038 5 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.033 0.033
0.039 0.039 6 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.034 0.034
0.041 0.041 7 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.038 0.038
0.043 0.043 8 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.042
0.044 0.044 9 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.042 0.042
0.044 0.044 10 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.047 0.047
0.044 0.044 11 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.048 0.048
0.044 0.044 12 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047
0.045 0.045 13 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.045 0.045
0.044 0.044 14 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.047 0.047
0.043 0.043 15 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.048 0.048
0.043 0.043 16 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.048 0.048
0.043 0.043 17 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.049 0.049
0.043 0.043 18 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046
0.043 0.043 19 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.043 0.043
0.043 0.043 20 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.038 0.038
0.042 0.042 21 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.038 0.038
0.042 0.042 22 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.041 0.041
0.040 0.040 23 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.045 0.045
0.039 0.039 24 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.040 0.040
Page 1 of 3
wh.XLS
Power year factor 1
Year no.0
Seasonal cons., gls.:49,243
Non-seas. cons.,gls.:0
Compound boiler eff.:0.73
Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual
Days:31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 11178
HDD:1,200 1,207 1,293 1,119 936 723 598 543 615 849 951 1,144 6,308,620
kwh:626,899 866,660 369,541 461,926 475,123 417,968 624,700 464,125 457,526 477,323 512,518 554,311 0
Gallons of Oil used per month, Gallons
Building Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual
Mach Shop 1,981 1,993 2,135 1,848 1,546 1,194 987 897 1,016 1,402 1,570 1,889 7,939
Maint Shop 852 857 918 795 665 514 425 386 437 603 675 813 6,943
Fire Station 745 750 803 695 581 449 371 337 382 527 591 711 14,999
Warehouse 1,610 1,620 1,735 1,501 1,256 970 802 729 825 1,139 1,276 1,535 900
Fuel Office 97 97 104 90 75 58 48 44 50 68 77 92 49,239
Total Use 5,286 5,317 5,696 4,929 4,123 3,185 2,634 2,392 2,709 3,740 4,189 5,039 0
WASTE HEAT UTILIZATION SIMULATION WORK SHEET -Concept:1 Mach Shop Saint Paul 11/10/2009
Heat available per hour by month (1,000 BTU's)
Hour Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual
1 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,752 1,835
2 1,703 2,375 1,643 1,490 1,590 1,443 1,821 1,555 1,584 1,598 1,658 1,736
3 1,857 2,241 1,549 2,013 2,035 1,848 1,881 1,990 2,027 2,045 1,564 1,638
4 1,857 2,241 1,549 2,013 1,975 1,794 1,826 1,931 1,967 1,985 1,564 1,638
5 1,801 2,174 1,503 1,953 1,975 1,794 1,826 1,931 1,967 1,985 1,517 1,588
6 1,857 2,241 1,549 2,013 1,505 1,957 1,725 1,472 1,500 1,513 1,564 1,638
7 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,505 1,957 1,725 1,472 1,500 1,513 1,752 1,835
8 1,993 2,778 1,923 1,744 1,590 1,443 1,821 1,555 1,584 1,598 1,680 1,759
9 1,993 2,778 1,923 1,744 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,680 1,759
10 2,021 3,113 1,505 1,693 1,885 1,712 1,953 1,843 1,878 1,895 1,884 1,972
11 2,065 3,180 1,538 1,730 1,590 1,443 1,821 1,555 1,584 1,598 1,925 2,015
12 2,021 3,113 1,505 1,693 1,668 1,750 1,996 1,884 1,920 1,677 1,884 1,972
13 1,934 2,979 1,440 1,871 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,802 1,887
14 2,021 3,113 1,505 1,693 1,815 1,904 2,171 1,775 1,808 1,824 1,884 1,972
15 2,065 3,180 1,538 1,730 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,925 2,015
16 2,065 3,180 1,538 1,730 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,925 2,015
17 2,109 3,247 1,571 1,767 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,965 2,058
18 1,978 3,046 1,473 1,914 1,885 1,712 1,953 1,843 1,878 1,895 1,843 1,930
19 2,042 2,845 1,970 1,787 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,720 1,801
20 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,752 1,835
21 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,632 1,481 1,870 1,596 1,626 1,640 1,752 1,835
22 1,945 2,711 1,876 1,702 1,632 1,481 1,870 1,596 1,626 1,640 1,893 1,716
23 1,934 2,979 1,440 1,871 1,632 1,481 1,870 1,596 1,626 1,640 1,802 1,887
24 1,897 2,644 1,830 1,659 1,716 1,558 1,966 1,678 1,710 1,725 1,846 1,673
Month BTU's 1437089 1853404 1218718 1263316 1295812 1218158 1447047 1274937 1256822 1302351 1275993 1364187 176,210
Gallons 15,624 20,150 13,250 13,735 14,088 13,244 15,732 13,861 13,664 14,159 13,872 14,831 0
Page 2 of 3
wh.XLSHeat demand by hour by month (1,000 BTU's)
Hour Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual
1 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586
2 602 671 649 580 470 375 300 273 319 426 493 574
3 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571
4 588 655 634 567 459 366 293 266 311 416 482 561
5 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571
6 609 678 656 586 475 379 303 275 322 431 498 580
7 645 718 695 621 503 401 321 292 341 456 528 615
8 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
9 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652
10 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656
11 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656
12 693 772 747 668 541 432 345 314 367 490 568 661
13 700 779 754 674 546 435 349 317 370 495 573 667
14 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652
15 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643
16 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
17 670 746 722 645 522 417 334 303 355 474 548 638
18 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
19 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
20 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643
21 659 734 710 635 514 410 328 298 349 466 539 628
22 654 728 705 630 510 407 326 296 346 463 536 623
23 629 700 678 606 491 392 313 285 333 445 515 600
24 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586
Total Demand 486,250 489,086 523,934 453,428 379,275 292,966 242,315 220,028 249,203 344,022 385,353 463,558 0
Heat delivered by hour by month (1,000 BTU's)
Hour Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual
1 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586
2 602 671 649 580 470 375 300 273 319 426 493 574
3 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571
4 588 655 634 567 459 366 293 266 311 416 482 561
5 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571
6 609 678 656 586 475 379 303 275 322 431 498 580
7 645 718 695 621 503 401 321 292 341 456 528 615
8 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
9 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652
10 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656
11 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656
12 693 772 747 668 541 432 345 314 367 490 568 661
13 700 779 754 674 546 435 349 317 370 495 573 667
14 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652
15 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643
16 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
17 670 746 722 645 522 417 334 303 355 474 548 638
18 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
19 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647
20 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643
21 659 734 710 635 514 410 328 298 349 466 539 628
22 654 728 705 630 510 407 326 296 346 463 536 623
23 629 700 678 606 491 392 313 285 333 445 515 600
Concept:24 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586
1 BTU's 486,250 489,086 523,934 453,428 379,275 292,966 242,315 220,028 249,203 344,022 385,353 463,558 49,244
Mach Shop Gallons 5,286 5,317 5,696 4,930 4,123 3,185 2,634 2,392 2,709 3,740 4,190 5,040 178
19.0722 19.1835 20.5503 17.78486544 14.8763 11.491 9.50433 8.63019 9.77452 13.493611 15.1148 18.1822 3.93705306
Maximum Hourly Heat Displaced 523,934,389 Btu/Hr Maximum Hourly Heat Demand 523934389 Btu/Hr
Maximum Hourly Heat Available 1,853,404,375 Btu/Hr
Maximum Hourly Peak KW 1,517 Kw Average Hourly Peak KW 726 Kw
Page 3 of 3
HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS
POLARCONSULT ALASKA , INC.
1503 W. 33 rd Suite 310 Tel.: (907) 258-2420
Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Fax.: (907) 258-2419
Prepared for: Bulk Fuel Office Notes: 1 Story Office
Address:
Legal:
Date(M/D/Y):11/10/09
*******FOUNDATION ******
Building Perimeter:82 (ft.)
Type of Wall:Concrete Insul. R-Value:8
Area Below Grade:164 (sq ft)Area Above Grade:246
********WALLS ********
Front Area (sq ft):179 Rear Area (sq ft):104
Front R-Value:19 Rear R-Value:19
Left Area (sq ft):60 Right Area (sq ft):60
Left R-Value:19 Right R-Value:19
*****WINDOW ****
Front Area:(sq ft)9 Rear Area:(sq ft)0
Left Area:(sq ft)0 Right Area:(sq ft)0
Type:Double-Pane R-Value:4
********DOORS ********
Number of Doors:1 Area:(sq ft)20
Metal?:YES R-Value:12
Garage Doors?:No Area:(sq ft)0
Number?:0 R-Value:8
********ROOF ********
Hot or Cold?:Cold R-Value:38
Area (SF):390
CONDUCTION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY
Toutside=0 Tinside=45
Btu/Hr- F Btu/Hr-45
Foundation 43.4 1,951
Walls 21.2 954
Windows 2.3 101
Doors 1.7 76
Roof 10.3 462
TOTALS:78.8 3,544
INFILTRATION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY
House Garage's
Total Floor Area:0 418 Infiltration Loss:
Room Height:8 8
Air Change/Hour:1.5 1.5 90 (Btu/Hr.-d. F)
TOTAL HEAT LOSS FROM HOUSE:
At 1 degree Temperature Difference 169 Btu/Hr- F
At 100 Degree Temp. Difference 7,607 Btu/Hr-100 T
Minimum Furnace Size 9,500 Btu/Hr Output
Fuel:138,000 BTU / Gal #2 Diesel
Efficency:90%
Heating Deg Days:11,178
Annual Fuel Consumption:7,656 Gal #2 diesel
HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS
POLARCONSULT ALASKA , INC.
1503 W. 33 rd Suite 310 Tel.: (907) 258-2420
Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Fax.: (907) 258-2419
Prepared for: Gas Station Notes: 1 Story Office
Address:
Legal:
Date(M/D/Y):11/10/09
*******FOUNDATION ******
Building Perimeter:64 (ft.)
Type of Wall:Wood Insul. R-Value:4
Area Below Grade:0 (sq ft)Area Above Grade:80
********WALLS ********
Front Area (sq ft):72 Rear Area (sq ft):96
Front R-Value:19 Rear R-Value:19
Left Area (sq ft):160 Right Area (sq ft):160
Left R-Value:19 Right R-Value:19
*****WINDOW ****
Front Area:(sq ft)4 Rear Area:(sq ft)0
Left Area:(sq ft)0 Right Area:(sq ft)0
Type:Double-Pane R-Value:4
********DOORS ********
Number of Doors:1 Area:(sq ft)20
Metal?:YES R-Value:12
Garage Doors?:No Area:(sq ft)0
Number?:0 R-Value:8
********ROOF ********
Hot or Cold?:Cold R-Value:38
Area (SF):240
CONDUCTION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY
Toutside=0 Tinside=45
Btu/Hr- F Btu/Hr-45
Foundation 20.0 900
Walls 25.7 1,155
Windows 1.0 45
Doors 1.7 76
Roof 6.3 284
TOTALS:54.7 2,460
INFILTRATION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY
House Garage's
Total Floor Area:0 418 Infiltration Loss:
Room Height:8 8
Air Change/Hour:1.5 1.5 90 (Btu/Hr.-d. F)
TOTAL HEAT LOSS FROM HOUSE:
At 1 degree Temperature Difference 145 Btu/Hr- F
At 100 Degree Temp. Difference 6,523 Btu/Hr-100 T
Minimum Furnace Size 8,200 Btu/Hr Output
Fuel:138,000 BTU / Gal #2 Diesel
Efficency:90%
Heating Deg Days:11,178
Annual Fuel Consumption:5,314 Gal #2 diesel
HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS
POLARCONSULT ALASKA , INC.
1503 W. 33 rd Suite 310 Tel.: (907) 258-2420
Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Fax.: (907) 258-2419
Prepared for: Pump Building Notes: 1 Story garage
Address:
Legal:
Date(M/D/Y):11/10/09
*******FOUNDATION ******
Building Perimeter:80 (ft.)
Type of Wall:Concrete Insul. R-Value:2
Area Below Grade:80 (sq ft)Area Above Grade:40
********WALLS ********
Front Area (sq ft):140 Rear Area (sq ft):160
Front R-Value:19 Rear R-Value:19
Left Area (sq ft):160 Right Area (sq ft):160
Left R-Value:19 Right R-Value:19
*****WINDOW ****
Front Area:(sq ft)0 Rear Area:(sq ft)0
Left Area:(sq ft)0 Right Area:(sq ft)0
Type:Double-Pane R-Value:4
********DOORS ********
Number of Doors:1 Area:(sq ft)20
Metal?:YES R-Value:12
Garage Doors?:No Area:(sq ft)0
Number?:0 R-Value:8
********ROOF ********
Hot or Cold?:Cold R-Value:38
Area (SF):400
CONDUCTION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY
Toutside=0 Tinside=33
Btu/Hr- F Btu/Hr-33
Foundation 26.2 863
Walls 32.6 1,076
Windows 0.0 0
Doors 1.7 56
Roof 10.5 347
TOTALS:71.0 2,343
INFILTRATION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY
House Garage's
Total Floor Area:0 418 Infiltration Loss:
Room Height:8 8
Air Change/Hour:1.5 1.5 90 (Btu/Hr.-d. F)
TOTAL HEAT LOSS FROM HOUSE:
At 1 degree Temperature Difference 161 Btu/Hr- F
At 100 Degree Temp. Difference 5,322 Btu/Hr-100 T
Minimum Furnace Size 6,700 Btu/Hr Output
Fuel:138,000 BTU / Gal #2 Diesel
Efficency:90%
Heating Deg Days:11,178
Annual Fuel Consumption:5,060 Gal #2 diesel
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application Round 3
AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009
H. Cat Diesel Generator Specifications.
N C POWER SYSTEMS CO.
OIL & GAS PERFORMANCE
DATA [508DZ22]
APRIL 09, 2009
For Help Desk Phone Numbers Click here
Performance Number: DM7913 Change Level: 00
Sales Model: 3508CDITA Combustion: DI Aspr: TA
Engine Power: 915 HP Speed: 1,200 RPM After Cooler: SCAC
Manifold Type: DRY Governor Type: ADEM3 After Cooler Temp(F): 140
Turbo Quantity: 2 Engine App: OF Turbo Arrangement: Parallel
Application Type: OIL FLD -DIE Engine Rating: OF Strategy:
Rating Type: P/DRIL-ELECT Certification: EPA TIER-2 2006 -
General Performance Data
ENGIN
E
SPEED
RPM
ENGIN
E
POWE
R BHP
ENGIN
E
TORQU
E LB.FT
ENGIN
E
BMEP
PSI
FUEL
BSFC
LB/BH
P-HR
FUEL
RAT
E
GPH
INTAK
E
MFLD
TEMP
DEG F
INTAK
E
MFLD
P IN-
HG
INTAKE
AIR
FLOW
CFM
EXH
MFLD
TEMP
DEG F
EXH
STAC
K
TEMP
DEG F
EXH
GAS
FLOW
CFM
1,200 915 4,002.74 286.74 0.34 43.98 148.82 61.03 1,797.52 1,166 856.76 4,594.44
1,200 823 3,602.24 258.03 0.34 40.23 148.46 55.02 1,677.45 1,147.28 849.2 4,266.02
1,200 732 3,202.49 229.31 0.35 36.48 148.28 49.01 1,557.38 1,128.38 842.36 3,937.59
1,200 686 3,001.87 215.09 0.35 34.61 148.28 45.99 1,497.34 1,119.02 839.3 3,775.14
1,200 640 2,801.99 200.74 0.36 32.6 148.28 42.11 1,419.65 1,108.94 836.24 3,570.32
1,200 549 2,401.5 172.02 0.36 28.58 148.28 34.32 1,260.73 1,085.9 830.48 3,157.13
1,200 457 2,001.74 143.3 0.37 24.46 148.28 26.53 1,105.35 1,058.9 824.54 2,747.48
1,200 366 1,601.24 114.73 0.39 20.34 147.74 19.66 967.62 998.96 795.38 2,351.96
1,200 274 1,200.75 86.01 0.41 16.14 147.02 13.5 844.02 904.64 741.02 1,959.97
1,200 229 1,000.87 71.65 0.43 14 146.48 10.72 787.52 844.52 703.94 1,762.2
1,200 183 800.25 57.29 0.45 11.78 145.76 8.23 734.55 759.56 642.2 1,557.38
1,200 91 400.5 28.72 0.55 7.21 143.96 4 635.66 547.52 480.56 1,140.66
General Performance Data 2
ENGIN
E
SPEED
RPM
ENGIN
E
POWE
R BHP
COMPRES
S OUT
PRESS
IN-HG
COMPRES
S OUT
TEMP DEG
F
1,200 915 61.6 360.5
1,200 823 55.55 338.54
1,200 732 49.48 316.4
1,200 686 46.46 305.42
1,200 640 42.52 289.76
1,200 549 34.68 258.62
1,200 457 26.83 227.3
1,200 366 19.93 196.34
1,200 274 13.74 165.74
1,200 229 10.96 150.62
1,200 183 8.5 137.3
1,200 91 4.26 113
Engine Heat Rejection Data
ENGIN
E
SPEED
RPM
ENGIN
E
POWE
R BHP
REJ TO
JW
BTU/M
N
REJ
TO
ATMO
S
BTU/M
N
REJ TO
EXHAUS
T
BTU/MN
EXH
RCOV
TO
350F
BTU/M
N
FROM
OIL
CLR
BTU/M
N
FROM
AFT
CLR
BTU/M
N
WORK
ENERG
Y
BTU/M
N
LHV
ENERG
Y
BTU/M
N
HHV
ENERGY
BTU/MN
1,200 915 15,241.1 6,426.3 33,155.1 17,174.7 4,720.2 6,767.5 38,785.3 94,176.5 100,318.5
1,200 823 14,331.2 6,255.7 30,539.1 15,753.0 4,316.4 5,743.9 34,918.1 86,157.9 91,788.0
1,200 732 13,478.2 6,028.2 27,980.0 14,445.0 3,912.6 4,720.2 31,051.0 78,139.2 83,200.6
1,200 686 13,023.2 5,97 1.3 26,728.8 13,762.5 3,713.6 4,208.4 29,117.4 74,101.5 78,935.4
1,200 640 12,511.4 5,857.6 25,250.2 12,966.3 3,497.5 3,639.7 27,126.9 69,893.1 74,442.7
1,200 549 11,487.7 5,630.1 22,236.1 11,374.0 3,065.3 2,616.0 23,259.8 61,248.9 65,229.8
1,200 457 10,350.3 5,402.6 19,165.2 9,781.6 2,627.4 1,535.5 19,392.6 52,434.0 55,846.2
1,200 366 9,156.0 4,890.8 16,037.3 8,018.6 2,183.8 796.2 15,525.5 43,562.3 46,405.8
1,200 274 7,848.0 4,265.2 12,795.7 6,085.1 1,728.8 284.4 11,658.3 34,576.9 36,794.8
1,200 229 7,165.6 3,867.1 11,146.5 5,118.3 1,501.4 56.9 9,724.8 29,970.4 31,960.9
1,200 183 6,369.4 3,525.9 9,326.7 3,867.1 1,262.5 -113.7 7,734.3 25,250.2 26,899.4
1,200 91 4,663.3 2,729.8 5,573.2 1,478.6 773.4 -341.2 3,867.1 15,468.6 16,492.3