Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSaint Paul Economy Upgrade Application Renewable Energy Fund Round 3 Grant Application AEA-10-015 – RENEWABLE ENERGY GRANT APPLICATION SAINT PAUL FUEL ECONOMY UPGRADE PROJECT November 9, 2009 prepared for: City of Saint Paul Electric Utility P.O. Box 901 Saint Paul Island, Alaska 99660 Renewable Energy Fund Round 3 Grant Application AEA 10-015 Application Page i 11/9/2009 Table of Contents Grant Application Form .................................................................. 11 pages Resume: Linda Snow, City Manager ............................................... 3 pages Application Cost Worksheet ............................................................. 2 pages Grant Budget From ............................................................................ 2 pages Letters of Support Pribilof School District ................................................................... 1page Saint Paul Council Resolution 09-03 ................................................. 1 page Waste Heat Load Calculat ions Waste Heat Piping Site Plan .......................................................... 1 page Waste Heat Schematic ................................................................... 1 page Waste Heat System Load Calculation ........................................... 3 page Waste Heat Load , Bulk Fuel Office .............................................. 2 page Waste Heat Load , Gas Station ....................................................... 2 page Waste Heat Load , Bulk Fuel Pum p Building ............................... 2 page Technical Support Information Cat 3512C Specifications ............................................................. 2 pages Renewable Energy Fund Round 3 Grant Application AEA 10-015 Application Page 1of 11 11/9/2009 SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION Name City of Saint Paul Electric Utility Type of Entity: City, Electric Utility Mailing Address P.O. Box 901 Saint Paul Island, AK 99660 Physical Address Saint Paul Island Telephone (907) 546-3113 Fax (907) 546-3188 Email lsnow@stpaulak.com 1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT Name Linda Snow Title City Manager Mailing Address P.O. Box 901 Saint Paul, AK 99660 Telephone (907) 546-3113 Fax (907) 546-3188 Email lsnow@stpaulak.com 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) X An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or An independent power producer in accordance with 3 AAC 107.695 (a) (1), or X A local government, or A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities); Yes 1.2.2. Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If the applicant is a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box ) Yes 1.2.3. As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant agreement. Yes 1.2.4. If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the application.) Yes 1.2.5 We intend to own and operate any project that may be constructed with grant funds for the benefit of the general public. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 2 of 11 11/9/2009 SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY 2.1 Project Title Saint Paul Fuel Economy Upgrade 2.2 Project Location The project will be constructed and operated in the City of Saint Paul Diesel Power plant within the Fuel Farm Subdivision on Saint Paul Island. The entire community of Saint Paul Island will benefit from this project. 2.3 PROJECT TYPE 2.3.1 Renewable Resource Type Wind Biomass or Biofuels Hydro, including run of river Transmission of Renewable Energy Geothermal, including Heat Pumps Small Natural Gas X Heat Recovery from existing sources Hydrokinetic Solar Storage of Renewable Other (Describe) 2.3.2 Proposed Grant Funded Phase(s) for this Request (Check all that apply) Reconnaissance X Design and Permitting Feasibility X Construction and Commissioning Conceptual Design 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project would be constructed at the existing utility power plant and adjacent buildings. A new low fuel consumption diesel 4,160v generator and switchgear would be installed to replace existing older 480v inefficient diesel generator unit #2. Existing waste heat system from the power plant would be extended by this project to provide space heat to the gas station, bulk fuel office and bulk fuel pump house to replace existing electric baseboard heat. Increase fuel efficiency and reduced electric heat load would benefit all existing electric customers through lower power generation costs. New d iesel generator would reduce current high overhaul and maintenance cost for old generator to be replaced. The City would administer the project and contract out to qualified consultants for the final design, and contract with a qualified contractor to install the diesel generators, switchgear and waste heat piping. The existing city workforce would operate and maintain the new equipment. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 3 of 11 11/9/2009 2.5 PROJECT BENEFIT The new higher efficiency 4,160kV diesel generator could be operated in parallel with existing la rge units under high load conditions and operated by itself under low load conditions for an estimated fuel savings of 7,800 gallons of diesel annually. The 580-foot extension of the existing waste heat system to the remaining nearby buildings would replace existing electric baseboard heat equivalent to 18,030 gallons of diesel annually. At the current cost of fuel of 3.45 $/gal this is an annual savings of $89,110 provided by the project. Present value of savings over the 15 -year life of the generator would be $924,900. The public will benefit from reduced diesel fuel consumption by the existing power plant equating to lower kwh cost of power to the consumer. Additional uncalculated savings will be realized from reduced maintenance cost as the engine b eing replaced is at the end of its useful life. Local jobs will be created during construction of the waste heat system and generator installation. 2.6 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW The City has completed the pre-construction phase of the project to identify the equipment required, and developed the preliminary design and construction cost estimate. The City of Saint Paul requests grant funds to complete the project. After grant award, the City will complete the project final design and specifications. Equip ment will be procured and contract(s) awarded for supply and installation of switchgear, generators and waste heat piping. Description Cost Project Final Design & Permitting $56,019 Equipment and Supplies $346,149 Construction $213,423 Total Project C ost $615,591 In Kind Contribution $104,650 Grant Request $510,941 2.7 COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY Grant Costs (Summary of funds requested) 2.7.1 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $510,941 2.7.2 Other Funds to be provided (Project match) $104,650 2.7.3 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.7.1 and 2.7.2) $615,591 Project Costs & Benefits 2.7.4 Total Project Cost (Summary from Cost Worksheet including estimates through construction) $615,591 2.7.5 Estimated Direct Financial Benefit (Savings) $89,1 10 2.7.6 Other Public Benefit (Section 5.) See Narrative SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 4 of 11 11/9/2009 3.1 Project Manager The project manager for this grant would be the City Manager Linda Snow, and the daily administration of the grant would be by Stephanie Mandregan the City’s Grants Administrator. The City of Saint Paul and Finance Department have administered numerous State and Federal grants and are in good standing with all State and Federal Agencies. The City has utilized the alternate management process with prior State Grants successfully. No assistance in project management will be required for this project. 3.2 Project Schedule 2009 Oct.: Preliminary Design and Modeling of New Diesel Engines and Waste Heat Extension. Completed 2010 July: Grant Award Sept.: Final project design and specifications. Sept.: Waste Heat pipe and fitting procurement bid. Sept.: Waste Heat pipe installation bid. Oct: Contractor installation of Waste Heat piping and building connections. Oct.: Diesel generator and switchgear procurement bid. Nov: Place new waste heat system in operation. 2011 Apr.: Ship diesel generator and switchgear to Saint Paul. Apr.: Remove existing 480v old generators May: Install 4,160 diesel generator and switchgear June: Start up generator and pla ce into service operation 3.3 Project Milestones Aug 2010: Review of preliminary design package and generator selection criteria by City power plant operations staff and administration to ensure meet plant requirements. Sept 2010: Review and approval of final design package and procurement documents by city administrator, finance director and attorney to ensure meet community requirements. Nov 2010: Analysis of bids for supply of generator, switchgear and piping to ensure meet specifications and recommendation for award of best value within project budget. March 2011: Analysis of bids for installation of generator and switchgear and piping to ensure meet project specifications and recommendation for award of best value within project budget. June 2011: Final project inspection, commissioning and start-up. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 5 of 11 11/9/2009 3.4 Project Resources The City is planning to utilize the services of the engineering team of Vector Engineering and Polarconsult Alaska, Inc to prepare final project design and to assist in the preparation of the diesel generator and waste heat procurement requests. The Polarconsult/Vector team will provide the technical expertise in support of the City to make this a successful project. The same team has worked with the City on the design and construction of the existing diesel electric power plant, electrical distribution and waste heat system. The successful diesel generator/switchgear contractor will provide the technical experience in installation of the equipment. Vector Engineerin g and City power plant crew have the technical experience required to oversee the contractor installation and operational experience required for long term project operation. The City finance department and administration has the fiscal management and exp erience applicable to project development and operations. 3.5 Project Communications The City will keep AEA informed of project status through monthly or quarterly project status reports as warranted. Reports will include a brief report including narrative of current project status, activities completed during the report period, list any problems encountered, and list anticipated activities in the next reporting period. Report will also include budget status and summary of current and projected costs. RFP’s and quote requests will be forwarded to AEA for review and comment, as they are prepared. 3.6 Project Risk Project has limited risk. Generation units have been installed successfully and have a reliable track record and documented fuel usage curves. Factory technicians would be enlisted if excessive fuel consumption or other generation problems are encountered. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 6 of 11 11/9/2009 SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. A new power plant was constructed in 1993 and waste heat distribution connected to the public works office and machine shop. Diesel generators and switchgear were moved from the original power plant to the new plant site. No new diesel generators were included in the new plant. Waste heat has been expanded to a new warehouse and fire station as they were constructed. The proposed energy resource is diesel fuel and waste heat from the generation plant. The proposed project reduces diesel fuel consumption through use of newer more fuel-efficient diesel generation. The proposed project also extends the waste heat system to all adjacent buildings to reduce space heat costs for the city bulk fuel facility which will equate to reduced incremental fuel costs. No additional buildings are within a half -mile of the power plant to allow for expansion of waste heat distribution. Wind generated electric energy has not been available to the City in the past. This project will not detract from possible future purchase of wind generated electric power if offered for sale. 4.2 Existing Energy System 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System The existing energy system consists of 6 Cat diesel generators, step up transformers and 7.2/12.47 kV 3 phase underground distribution system, and step down transformers to individual utilit y customers. Annual average generation per gallon of fuel burned shown for each unit. 1. Cat 3512 855 kW 1,200 rpm 4,160v gen, 36,966 total hrs, installed 1995 Avg 14.43 kWh/gal 2. Cat 3412 600 kW 1,800 rpm 480v gen, 5,889 total hrs, installed 1993 Avg 11.64 kWh/gal To Be Replaced with new 4,160v generator this project. 3. Cat 3406 210 kW 1,800 rpm 480v gen, 5,145 total hrs, installed 1988 Avg 12.33 kWh/gal 4. Cat 3412 300 kW 1,200 rpm 480v gen, 17,707 total hrs, installed 1991 Avg 12.31 kWh/gal 5. Cat 3512 650 kW 1,200 rpm 480v gen, 20,603 total hrs, installed 1991 Avg 12.61 kWh/gal 6. Cat 3512 855 kW 1,200 rpm 480v gen, 79,391 total hrs, installed 1991 Avg 13.26 kWh/gal The existing distribution system was installed between 1990 and 19 94 with further extensions as new customers have been added. 4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used The existing utility generation is entirely from diesel generation. The new diesel engine and switchgear would be added to the existing 4,160v switchgear bus. The impact to the existing infrastructure will be limited. Waste Heat piping will be extended from the end of the existing piping at the Fire Station, with a single series line through the 3 new buildings and back to the City Machine Shop to tie into the existing system return line. No impacts to the existing system are anticipated. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 7 of 11 11/9/2009 4.2.3 Existing Energy Market The proposed project should only impact existing customers by reducing their monthly utility bill through reduced power production costs. The existing energy market is fairly stable with future possible load by adding the existing Trident Processing plant and Icicle floating processors to the existing electric utility. Addition of these new customers may be possible with reduced power costs. Addition of these large power consumers that currently self generate would reduce the incremental cost of power by spreading the base cost of electricity over additional consumers. 4.3 Proposed System 4.3.1 System Design The proposed project will upgrade existing diesel generation with newer low fuel consumption diesel generator and switchgear that is more fuel-efficient than existing generator being replaced. Unit is sized to work with existing diesel generators to supply reliable electricity to the community. The new generator will be tied into the existing waste heat distribution system that supplies space heat to the public works office, machine shop, warehouse and fire station. The project will extend the waste heat system to supply space heat to the remaining 3 buildings nearby including the bulk fuel office, gas station and bulk fuel pump building. The new generator is sized to efficiently work with existing plant generators to supply the community load. Plant installed capacity will be 3.47 MW. Existing plant annual generation is 5,550,000 kWh. The new generator is anticipated to generate 754,800 kWh of electricity for a plant capacity factor of 13.6%. No barriers are anticipated in the construction of this project. No change to existing electric power distribution system to the community is proposed. 4.3.2 Land Ownership The entire proposed project site is within the Fuel Farm subdivision owned by the City of Saint Paul. No other lands are required for the project. 4.3.3 Permits A coastal zone questionnaire will be completed as part of the final design which will entail the following requirements: - The existing City of Saint Paul Air Quality Permit will have to be updated to identify the new diesel generator being installed to replace the existing generator #2 listed on their permit. - No other permits are required for the construction of this project. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 8 of 11 11/9/2009 4.3.4 Environmental Threatened or Endangered Species: No threatened or endangered species are found within the project area, an existing power plant, road right of way and parking area. Habitat: Existing project area consists of previously filled roadway and parking lot, and building interior. This project will not change existing habitat. USFW will be consulted during project permitting. Wetlands: No wetlands are found in the proposed project area. Historic and Archeological Resources: No archeological or historic resources are present in the proposed project area. All excavation for waste heat piping will be within previously filled parking areas and roadbeds. SHPO will be consulted during the course of the project. Aesthetics: Project will be visible to the public during excavation for installation of waste heat pipes only. New generator will replace an existing generator in the existing power plant. Aviation: No impact on aviation as waste heat line buried, and new generator within existing power plant building. Telecommunications interference: Waste heat line will cross existing buried phone lines. Locates will be obtained prior to construction. 4.4 Proposed New System Costs and Projected Revenues 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Total project cost is $615,591. The City is supplying 17% of the project cost through cash and in kind contributions totaling $104,651. The City is requesting $510,940 in grant funds for this project. Purchase and operating costs for generator and switchgear were obtained from NC Machinery and Cat Power systems. Costs for waste heat pipe and equipment were obtained from installation of the waste heat system extension to the fire station in 2008. Installation costs were estimated based on prior costs expended by the City to install previous generators and switchgear in the power plant and to install extensions of the existing wastes heat system to the fire station. 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Operating and maintenance costs are estimated to be equal to existing operation and maintenance costs for the existing diesel power plant with $233,749 labor and $1,548,550 non-labor costs. Some reduced cost in overhauls will be achieved by replacing an old engine that has exceeded its useful life but are not counted in the project benefit for this project. Operations and maintenance is funded through the sale of electric power to residential, commercial and institutional customers. No change in the revenue collection is anticipated. The anticipated reduction in the operation and maintenance costs by this project will be reviewed for possible changes to the existing electric tariff by the City Council. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 9 of 11 11/9/2009 4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale No change in the number of utility customers is anticipated. The grant project has a payback of 6.9 years with no change in the electric rate. Changes of the electric rate equal to the grant project savings if instituted by the City Council would create a 100% rate of return to the public for the grant. Until a new tariff is enacted the actual rate of return cannot be calculated. 4.4.4 Project Cost Worksheet See attached project cost worksheet in the end of this application. SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT The offset use of diesel fuel by this project is anticipated to be 7,800 gallons from electric generation efficiency and 18,029 gallons of diesel fuel space heat. With the current cost of diesel fuel at $3.45 per gallon this equates to a savings of $36,918 to the utility for purchasing diesel fuel, and a savings of $62,200 to the bulk fuel and marine sales departments of the City in annual electric heating costs. Present value of savings over the 15-year life of the generator would be $924,900. The new diesel generator is also anticipated to reduce the electric utility annual overhaul and maintenance cost on generators with the introduction of a new generator to replace a unit that is beyond its useful life. Operation of the new unit will reduce operating hours on other units in the plant. The actual savings has not been calculated, or included in the project benefit worksheet. The reduced cost of diesel for generation and overhead cost for supply of diesel fuel to the community will depend on final tariff changes made by the City Council. SECTION 6– SUSTAINABILITY Existing operation and maintenance of the power plant are not proposed to be changed. Existing maintenance and operations of the power plant are budgeted annually and supported through sales of electricity. No operational problems are anticipated. If problems arise the City works with Vector Engineering, Polarconsult Alaska and NC Machine to troubleshoot and repair generation equipment. The City of Saint Paul is fully committed to annual review and summary of cost savings from this project in contrast to historical operational costs. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application Page 10 of 11 11/9/2009 SECTION 7 – READINESS & COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER GRANTS The City has completed a feasibility analysis to review options for increased efficiency in the existing diesel power plant. An analysis of operations with existing and proposed diesel engines was performed to estimate fuel savings. Existing power plant is laid out to allow for installation of new 4,160v switchgear adjacent to existing Engine #1 4,160v switchgear with conduits to diesel generator location. Existing 480v switchgear can be abandoned in place and new switchgear installed without effecting existing power generation. The City of Saint Paul received grant funding for construction of distribution upgrades to allow relocation of the power plant to the present location. Project was completed on time and on budget. The City of Saint Paul received a power project loan for construction of the new power plant in its present location. The project was completed on time and on budget. The City is currently paying back the power project loan in accordance with the loan conditions. The City of Saint Paul has successfully completed all grant projects it has received in the past and met all grant conditions. SECTION 8– LOCAL SUPORT The community is in full support of the proposed project. Letters of support have been included in this application in the appendix. SECTION 9 – GRANT BUDGET The total project cost is $615,591. The City has completed the feasibility and economic analysis, and concept design for the project prior to this grant application. The City is requesting $510,941 in grant funds for the project. The project grant budget is attached as Appendix B. The City will be supplying 17% of the total project cost as local match for this grant. Local match will consist of a combination of City general funds, grant administration and oversight, city public works crew labor and city equipment. Renewable Energy Fund Round 3 Grant Application AEA 10-015 Application 11/9/2009 A. Resumes of Applicant’s Project Manager, key staff, partners, consultants, and suppliers. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 B. Cost Worksheet per application form Section 4.4.4. Renewable Energy Fund Round 3 Project Cost/Benefit Worksheet RFA AEA10-015 Application Cost Worksheet Page 1 10-7-09 1. Renewable Energy Source Annual average resource availability. 1,543 MMBTU Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel) 2. Existing Energy Generation and Usage a) Basic configuration i. Number of generators/boilers/other 6 ii. Rated capacity of generators 3.47 MW iii. Generator type Cat Diesel Generators iv. Age of generators 14, 16, 21, 18, 18, 18 years old v. Efficiency of generators 11.64 to 14.43 kWh / gal b) Annual O&M cost i. O&M cost for labor $233,749 / year ii. O&M cost for non-labor $1,548,550 / year c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage i. Electricity [kWh] 5,537,487 last 12 mths ii. Fuel usage Diesel 397,800 gallons Other iii. Peak Load 820 kW iv. Average Load 650 kW v. Minimum Load 480 kW vi. Efficiency 13.44 kW Generated per gallon of diesel fuel vii. Future trends 13.69 kW Generated per gallon diesel fuel d) Annual heating fuel usage i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] ii. Electricity [kWh] 18,030 gallons of fuel displaced by new Waste Heat iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] vi. Other Renewable Energy Fund Round 3 Project Cost/Benefit Worksheet RFA AEA10-015 Application Cost Worksheet Page 2 10-7-09 3. Proposed System Design Capacity and Fuel Usage a) Proposed renewable capacity Waste Heat available = 0.176 MMBTU/hr b) Proposed Annual electricity or heat production i. Electricity [kWh] 5,600,000 kWh 754,800 kWh new engine #2 ii.Heat [MMBtu] .06 MMBtu load added with waste heat extension. c) Proposed Annual fuel Usage i. Propane [gal or MMBtu] ii. Coal [tons or MMBtu] iii. Wood iv. Other – Diesel 405,271 gallons (7,800 gallons savings) 4. Project Cost a) Total capital cost of new system $615,591 b) Development cost c) Annual O&M cost of new system $1,782,300 d) Annual fuel cost $1,398,186 5. Project Benefits a) Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity 7,799 gallons diesel ii. Heat 18,030 gallons diesel iii. Transportation b) Price of displaced fuel $3.45 c) Other economic benefits d) Alaska public benefits $89,110 6. Power Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for power purchase/sale 7. Project Analysis a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio $924,900 / $615,591 = 1.50 Payback 6.9 years Saint Paul Electric Utility Fuel Economy Upgrade 11/10/2009 Fuel Usage Engine Use kWh ProducedFuel Used Fuel Usage Engine Use kWh Produced Fuel Used (kwh/gal)(kwh/gal) Engine #1 14.43 41.27%2,290,485 158,731 14.43 41.27%2,290,485 158,731 Engine #2 11.64 5.60%310,800 26,701 14.60 13.60%754,800 51,687 Engine #3 12.33 7.68%426,240 34,569 12.33 7.68%426,240 34,569 Engine #4 12.31 8.45%468,975 38,097 12.31 10.95%607,725 49,368 Engine #5 12.61 0.50%27,750 2,201 12.61 0.00%0 0 Engine #6 13.26 36.50%2,025,750 152,771 13.26 26.50%1,470,750 110,916 Total 13.44 100.00%5,550,000 413,070 13.69 100.00%5,550,000 405,271 New Low Fuel Consumption Diesel Generator Gallons of Diesel Fuel displaced by new Generator #2 7,799 gal Replace electric Baseboard with Waste Heat Equivalent gallons of fuel saved at Pump Building 5,060 gal Replace electric Baseboard with Waste Heat Equivalent gallons of fuel saved at Gas Station 5,314 gal Replace electric Baseboard with Waste Heat Equivalent gallons of fuel saved at Bulk Fuel Office 7,656 gal Total Annual Gallons of Fuel Displaced This Project 25,829 gal Fuel Cost per gallon $3.45 Interest 5%Annual $ Savings This Project $89,109.91 Life 15 years Present Value of Savings $924,930.36 Existing System Proposed New, This Project Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 C. Grant Budget Form per application form Section 9. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Round III Grant Budget Form 10-7-09 Milestone or Task Anticipated Completion Date RE- Fund Grant Funds Grantee Matching Funds Source of Matching Funds: Cash/In - kind/Federal Grants/Other State Grants/Other TOTALS Air Quality Permit Modification Application September 2010 $1,660 $340 $2,000 Final System Design / Bid Documents September 2010 $44,836 $9,183 Cash $54,019 Equipment Bid and Purchase March 2011 $287,304 $58,845 Cash $346,149 Equipment Installation / Waste Heat Bid February 2011 $1,660 $340 Cash/In Kind $2,000 Equipment Installation / Waste Heat Construction June 2011 $173,821 $35,602 Cash/In-kind $209,423 Final Acceptance, Commissioning and Start Up June 2011 $1,660 $340 Cash/In-kind $2,000 $ $ $ $ TOTALS $510,941 $104,650 $615,591 Budget Categories: Direct Labor & Benefits $29,091 $5,959 $35,050 Travel & Per Diem $21,123 $4,327 $25,450 Equipment $282,323 $57,825 $340,148 Materials & Supplies $6,640 $1,360 $8,000 Contractual Services $46,496 $9,523 $56,019 Construction Services $105,616 $21,632 $127,248 Other $19,651 $4,025 $23,676 TOTALS $510,940 $104,651 $615,591 Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 D. Letters demonstrating local support per application form Section 8. Pribilof School District St. George School St. Paul School Box 905 St. Paul Island Alaska 99660 Phone:907-546-2221 Fax:907-546-2327 November 6, 2009 Linda Snow, City Manager City of Saint Paul P.O. Box 901 St. Paul Island, Alaska 99660 Dear Ms. Snow: It is my understanding the City of Saint Paul plans to submit a grant application that will result in increased fuel efficiency in power generation and some reductions in the electric heat load due to waste heat recovery. I am very supportive of any and all efforts the City can make towards reducing operational costs leading to the potential reductions in the cost of electricity. For example, the City has been successful in using grant funds to implement a pilot project using the AMPY pay-as-you-go metering system in over 60 residential homes. This is an excellent project targeted at allowing the customer much more knowledge and control of their own electrical use, thereby reducing electrical demand. Although I realize that electric rates on St. Paul Island fall in the middle ground between many other Power Cost Equalization (PCE) recipients, I know the community can benefit from greater efficiencies in the generation of electrical power. I am aware that technological advancements have been made in diesel generators, and there is every reason why the communities who are dependent upon diesel generated power should benefit from new technology. The Pribilof School District currently spends $120,920/yr on electrical costs. With the potential savings the City could realize by replacing one of their existing diesel generators to a lower fuel consumption diesel generator, these savings can be passed on to its customers. The District has limited funding, based on student population. With declining enrollment and energy costs being what they are, we may have no alternative but to cut staffing. If energy savings is realized we can maintain status quo and continue to provide our students with the best quality education possible. Thank you for your continued efforts toward reducing the cost of living on St. Paul. Sincerely, Sherry Lestenkof School Board President Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 E. Governing Body Resolution or other formal action taken by the applicant’s governing body or management per RFA Section 1.4. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 F. Waste Heat System plan and piping schematic drawing. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 G. Waste Heat load calculations. wh.XLSWASTE HEAT UTILIZATION SIMULATION WORK SHEET -Concept:1 Mach Shop Saint Paul 11/10/2009 Location:Saint Paul 11:55 AM Date:Nov-09 GENERATOR DATA:Cat 3512, 1200 RPM Output Heat To Heat To SYSTEM LOSS DATA: Flow Rate 370 gpm kw Coolant Ambient 100% Constant losses: Heat rate at kw-load above:0 6,684 10,272 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Plant piping:0 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:177.4 6,684 10,272 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Subsurface piping:29,239 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:354.8 3,916 6,049 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Engine preheating:0 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:532.2 2,754 4,543 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Total constant:29,239 Btu/hr. Heat rate at kw-load above:709.6 2,390 4,224 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Variable losses: Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Surface piping:50 Btu/hr.xF Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Plant heating:1,791 Btu/hr.xF Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Radiator losses:75 Btu/hr.xF Heat rate at kw-load above:887 2,166 3,504 (BTU/HR)/(KWH) Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual GENERATION DATA:Kwh/Mth:626,899 866,660 369,541 461,926 475,123 417,968 624,700 464,125 457,526 477,323 512,518 554,311 11,178 WEATHER DATA:HDD/Mth:1,200 1,207 1,293 1,119 936 723 598 543 615 849 951 1,144 0 BUILDING DATA:Pipe Pipe Heat Pipe Fuel use,Non-In Boiler Dist.Dia.Loss Loss gallons Seasonal Seasonal Use ?Effic.(FT)(IN)(Btu/Ft)(GAL/YR) Mach Shop 18,459 0 1 0.73 264 3.00 19.42 199 Maint Shop 7,940 0 1 0.73 164 3.00 19.42 177 Fire Station 6,944 0 1 0.73 200 2.0 18.33 405 Warehouse 15,000 0 1 0.73 70 3.0 19.42 1,188 Fuel Office 900 0 1 0.73 70 2.0 18.33 51,340 Building in use; 1=yes, 0=no Assumed Diurnal Heat Power Plant Production & Hourly Variation Demand Variation: Winter Summer Hour:Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 0.039 0.039 1 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 2 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.036 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.036 0.036 0.038 0.038 3 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.034 0.034 0.038 0.038 4 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.038 0.038 5 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.033 0.033 0.039 0.039 6 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.034 0.034 0.041 0.041 7 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.038 0.038 0.043 0.043 8 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.042 0.044 0.044 9 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.042 0.042 0.044 0.044 10 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.047 0.047 0.044 0.044 11 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.039 0.048 0.048 0.044 0.044 12 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.045 0.045 13 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.045 0.045 0.044 0.044 14 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.047 0.047 0.043 0.043 15 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.048 0.048 0.043 0.043 16 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.048 0.048 0.043 0.043 17 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.049 0.049 0.043 0.043 18 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.043 0.043 19 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 20 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.038 0.038 0.042 0.042 21 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.038 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.038 0.038 0.042 0.042 22 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.041 0.041 0.040 0.040 23 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.045 0.045 0.039 0.039 24 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.040 0.040 Page 1 of 3 wh.XLS Power year factor 1 Year no.0 Seasonal cons., gls.:49,243 Non-seas. cons.,gls.:0 Compound boiler eff.:0.73 Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual Days:31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 11178 HDD:1,200 1,207 1,293 1,119 936 723 598 543 615 849 951 1,144 6,308,620 kwh:626,899 866,660 369,541 461,926 475,123 417,968 624,700 464,125 457,526 477,323 512,518 554,311 0 Gallons of Oil used per month, Gallons Building Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual Mach Shop 1,981 1,993 2,135 1,848 1,546 1,194 987 897 1,016 1,402 1,570 1,889 7,939 Maint Shop 852 857 918 795 665 514 425 386 437 603 675 813 6,943 Fire Station 745 750 803 695 581 449 371 337 382 527 591 711 14,999 Warehouse 1,610 1,620 1,735 1,501 1,256 970 802 729 825 1,139 1,276 1,535 900 Fuel Office 97 97 104 90 75 58 48 44 50 68 77 92 49,239 Total Use 5,286 5,317 5,696 4,929 4,123 3,185 2,634 2,392 2,709 3,740 4,189 5,039 0 WASTE HEAT UTILIZATION SIMULATION WORK SHEET -Concept:1 Mach Shop Saint Paul 11/10/2009 Heat available per hour by month (1,000 BTU's) Hour Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual 1 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,752 1,835 2 1,703 2,375 1,643 1,490 1,590 1,443 1,821 1,555 1,584 1,598 1,658 1,736 3 1,857 2,241 1,549 2,013 2,035 1,848 1,881 1,990 2,027 2,045 1,564 1,638 4 1,857 2,241 1,549 2,013 1,975 1,794 1,826 1,931 1,967 1,985 1,564 1,638 5 1,801 2,174 1,503 1,953 1,975 1,794 1,826 1,931 1,967 1,985 1,517 1,588 6 1,857 2,241 1,549 2,013 1,505 1,957 1,725 1,472 1,500 1,513 1,564 1,638 7 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,505 1,957 1,725 1,472 1,500 1,513 1,752 1,835 8 1,993 2,778 1,923 1,744 1,590 1,443 1,821 1,555 1,584 1,598 1,680 1,759 9 1,993 2,778 1,923 1,744 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,680 1,759 10 2,021 3,113 1,505 1,693 1,885 1,712 1,953 1,843 1,878 1,895 1,884 1,972 11 2,065 3,180 1,538 1,730 1,590 1,443 1,821 1,555 1,584 1,598 1,925 2,015 12 2,021 3,113 1,505 1,693 1,668 1,750 1,996 1,884 1,920 1,677 1,884 1,972 13 1,934 2,979 1,440 1,871 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,802 1,887 14 2,021 3,113 1,505 1,693 1,815 1,904 2,171 1,775 1,808 1,824 1,884 1,972 15 2,065 3,180 1,538 1,730 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,925 2,015 16 2,065 3,180 1,538 1,730 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,925 2,015 17 2,109 3,247 1,571 1,767 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,965 2,058 18 1,978 3,046 1,473 1,914 1,885 1,712 1,953 1,843 1,878 1,895 1,843 1,930 19 2,042 2,845 1,970 1,787 1,742 1,827 2,084 1,703 1,735 1,750 1,720 1,801 20 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,801 1,635 2,062 1,761 1,794 1,810 1,752 1,835 21 1,800 2,509 1,736 1,575 1,632 1,481 1,870 1,596 1,626 1,640 1,752 1,835 22 1,945 2,711 1,876 1,702 1,632 1,481 1,870 1,596 1,626 1,640 1,893 1,716 23 1,934 2,979 1,440 1,871 1,632 1,481 1,870 1,596 1,626 1,640 1,802 1,887 24 1,897 2,644 1,830 1,659 1,716 1,558 1,966 1,678 1,710 1,725 1,846 1,673 Month BTU's 1437089 1853404 1218718 1263316 1295812 1218158 1447047 1274937 1256822 1302351 1275993 1364187 176,210 Gallons 15,624 20,150 13,250 13,735 14,088 13,244 15,732 13,861 13,664 14,159 13,872 14,831 0 Page 2 of 3 wh.XLSHeat demand by hour by month (1,000 BTU's) Hour Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual 1 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586 2 602 671 649 580 470 375 300 273 319 426 493 574 3 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571 4 588 655 634 567 459 366 293 266 311 416 482 561 5 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571 6 609 678 656 586 475 379 303 275 322 431 498 580 7 645 718 695 621 503 401 321 292 341 456 528 615 8 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 9 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652 10 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656 11 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656 12 693 772 747 668 541 432 345 314 367 490 568 661 13 700 779 754 674 546 435 349 317 370 495 573 667 14 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652 15 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643 16 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 17 670 746 722 645 522 417 334 303 355 474 548 638 18 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 19 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 20 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643 21 659 734 710 635 514 410 328 298 349 466 539 628 22 654 728 705 630 510 407 326 296 346 463 536 623 23 629 700 678 606 491 392 313 285 333 445 515 600 24 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586 Total Demand 486,250 489,086 523,934 453,428 379,275 292,966 242,315 220,028 249,203 344,022 385,353 463,558 0 Heat delivered by hour by month (1,000 BTU's) Hour Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual 1 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586 2 602 671 649 580 470 375 300 273 319 426 493 574 3 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571 4 588 655 634 567 459 366 293 266 311 416 482 561 5 599 667 646 577 467 373 299 271 317 424 491 571 6 609 678 656 586 475 379 303 275 322 431 498 580 7 645 718 695 621 503 401 321 292 341 456 528 615 8 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 9 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652 10 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656 11 689 767 742 663 537 429 343 312 365 487 564 656 12 693 772 747 668 541 432 345 314 367 490 568 661 13 700 779 754 674 546 435 349 317 370 495 573 667 14 684 762 737 659 533 426 341 309 362 484 560 652 15 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643 16 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 17 670 746 722 645 522 417 334 303 355 474 548 638 18 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 19 679 756 732 654 530 423 338 307 360 480 556 647 20 674 751 727 650 526 420 336 305 357 477 552 643 21 659 734 710 635 514 410 328 298 349 466 539 628 22 654 728 705 630 510 407 326 296 346 463 536 623 23 629 700 678 606 491 392 313 285 333 445 515 600 Concept:24 615 685 662 592 480 383 306 278 326 435 503 586 1 BTU's 486,250 489,086 523,934 453,428 379,275 292,966 242,315 220,028 249,203 344,022 385,353 463,558 49,244 Mach Shop Gallons 5,286 5,317 5,696 4,930 4,123 3,185 2,634 2,392 2,709 3,740 4,190 5,040 178 19.0722 19.1835 20.5503 17.78486544 14.8763 11.491 9.50433 8.63019 9.77452 13.493611 15.1148 18.1822 3.93705306 Maximum Hourly Heat Displaced 523,934,389 Btu/Hr Maximum Hourly Heat Demand 523934389 Btu/Hr Maximum Hourly Heat Available 1,853,404,375 Btu/Hr Maximum Hourly Peak KW 1,517 Kw Average Hourly Peak KW 726 Kw Page 3 of 3 HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS POLARCONSULT ALASKA , INC. 1503 W. 33 rd Suite 310 Tel.: (907) 258-2420 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Fax.: (907) 258-2419 Prepared for: Bulk Fuel Office Notes: 1 Story Office Address: Legal: Date(M/D/Y):11/10/09 *******FOUNDATION ****** Building Perimeter:82 (ft.) Type of Wall:Concrete Insul. R-Value:8 Area Below Grade:164 (sq ft)Area Above Grade:246 ********WALLS ******** Front Area (sq ft):179 Rear Area (sq ft):104 Front R-Value:19 Rear R-Value:19 Left Area (sq ft):60 Right Area (sq ft):60 Left R-Value:19 Right R-Value:19 *****WINDOW **** Front Area:(sq ft)9 Rear Area:(sq ft)0 Left Area:(sq ft)0 Right Area:(sq ft)0 Type:Double-Pane R-Value:4 ********DOORS ******** Number of Doors:1 Area:(sq ft)20 Metal?:YES R-Value:12 Garage Doors?:No Area:(sq ft)0 Number?:0 R-Value:8 ********ROOF ******** Hot or Cold?:Cold R-Value:38 Area (SF):390 CONDUCTION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY Toutside=0 Tinside=45 Btu/Hr- F Btu/Hr-45 Foundation 43.4 1,951 Walls 21.2 954 Windows 2.3 101 Doors 1.7 76 Roof 10.3 462 TOTALS:78.8 3,544 INFILTRATION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY House Garage's Total Floor Area:0 418 Infiltration Loss: Room Height:8 8 Air Change/Hour:1.5 1.5 90 (Btu/Hr.-d. F) TOTAL HEAT LOSS FROM HOUSE: At 1 degree Temperature Difference 169 Btu/Hr- F At 100 Degree Temp. Difference 7,607 Btu/Hr-100 T Minimum Furnace Size 9,500 Btu/Hr Output Fuel:138,000 BTU / Gal #2 Diesel Efficency:90% Heating Deg Days:11,178 Annual Fuel Consumption:7,656 Gal #2 diesel HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS POLARCONSULT ALASKA , INC. 1503 W. 33 rd Suite 310 Tel.: (907) 258-2420 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Fax.: (907) 258-2419 Prepared for: Gas Station Notes: 1 Story Office Address: Legal: Date(M/D/Y):11/10/09 *******FOUNDATION ****** Building Perimeter:64 (ft.) Type of Wall:Wood Insul. R-Value:4 Area Below Grade:0 (sq ft)Area Above Grade:80 ********WALLS ******** Front Area (sq ft):72 Rear Area (sq ft):96 Front R-Value:19 Rear R-Value:19 Left Area (sq ft):160 Right Area (sq ft):160 Left R-Value:19 Right R-Value:19 *****WINDOW **** Front Area:(sq ft)4 Rear Area:(sq ft)0 Left Area:(sq ft)0 Right Area:(sq ft)0 Type:Double-Pane R-Value:4 ********DOORS ******** Number of Doors:1 Area:(sq ft)20 Metal?:YES R-Value:12 Garage Doors?:No Area:(sq ft)0 Number?:0 R-Value:8 ********ROOF ******** Hot or Cold?:Cold R-Value:38 Area (SF):240 CONDUCTION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY Toutside=0 Tinside=45 Btu/Hr- F Btu/Hr-45 Foundation 20.0 900 Walls 25.7 1,155 Windows 1.0 45 Doors 1.7 76 Roof 6.3 284 TOTALS:54.7 2,460 INFILTRATION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY House Garage's Total Floor Area:0 418 Infiltration Loss: Room Height:8 8 Air Change/Hour:1.5 1.5 90 (Btu/Hr.-d. F) TOTAL HEAT LOSS FROM HOUSE: At 1 degree Temperature Difference 145 Btu/Hr- F At 100 Degree Temp. Difference 6,523 Btu/Hr-100 T Minimum Furnace Size 8,200 Btu/Hr Output Fuel:138,000 BTU / Gal #2 Diesel Efficency:90% Heating Deg Days:11,178 Annual Fuel Consumption:5,314 Gal #2 diesel HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS POLARCONSULT ALASKA , INC. 1503 W. 33 rd Suite 310 Tel.: (907) 258-2420 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Fax.: (907) 258-2419 Prepared for: Pump Building Notes: 1 Story garage Address: Legal: Date(M/D/Y):11/10/09 *******FOUNDATION ****** Building Perimeter:80 (ft.) Type of Wall:Concrete Insul. R-Value:2 Area Below Grade:80 (sq ft)Area Above Grade:40 ********WALLS ******** Front Area (sq ft):140 Rear Area (sq ft):160 Front R-Value:19 Rear R-Value:19 Left Area (sq ft):160 Right Area (sq ft):160 Left R-Value:19 Right R-Value:19 *****WINDOW **** Front Area:(sq ft)0 Rear Area:(sq ft)0 Left Area:(sq ft)0 Right Area:(sq ft)0 Type:Double-Pane R-Value:4 ********DOORS ******** Number of Doors:1 Area:(sq ft)20 Metal?:YES R-Value:12 Garage Doors?:No Area:(sq ft)0 Number?:0 R-Value:8 ********ROOF ******** Hot or Cold?:Cold R-Value:38 Area (SF):400 CONDUCTION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY Toutside=0 Tinside=33 Btu/Hr- F Btu/Hr-33 Foundation 26.2 863 Walls 32.6 1,076 Windows 0.0 0 Doors 1.7 56 Roof 10.5 347 TOTALS:71.0 2,343 INFILTRATION HEAT LOSS SUMMARY House Garage's Total Floor Area:0 418 Infiltration Loss: Room Height:8 8 Air Change/Hour:1.5 1.5 90 (Btu/Hr.-d. F) TOTAL HEAT LOSS FROM HOUSE: At 1 degree Temperature Difference 161 Btu/Hr- F At 100 Degree Temp. Difference 5,322 Btu/Hr-100 T Minimum Furnace Size 6,700 Btu/Hr Output Fuel:138,000 BTU / Gal #2 Diesel Efficency:90% Heating Deg Days:11,178 Annual Fuel Consumption:5,060 Gal #2 diesel Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Round 3 AEA10-015 Grant Application 11/9/2009 H. Cat Diesel Generator Specifications. N C POWER SYSTEMS CO. OIL & GAS PERFORMANCE DATA [508DZ22] APRIL 09, 2009 For Help Desk Phone Numbers Click here Performance Number: DM7913 Change Level: 00 Sales Model: 3508CDITA Combustion: DI Aspr: TA Engine Power: 915 HP Speed: 1,200 RPM After Cooler: SCAC Manifold Type: DRY Governor Type: ADEM3 After Cooler Temp(F): 140 Turbo Quantity: 2 Engine App: OF Turbo Arrangement: Parallel Application Type: OIL FLD -DIE Engine Rating: OF Strategy: Rating Type: P/DRIL-ELECT Certification: EPA TIER-2 2006 - General Performance Data ENGIN E SPEED RPM ENGIN E POWE R BHP ENGIN E TORQU E LB.FT ENGIN E BMEP PSI FUEL BSFC LB/BH P-HR FUEL RAT E GPH INTAK E MFLD TEMP DEG F INTAK E MFLD P IN- HG INTAKE AIR FLOW CFM EXH MFLD TEMP DEG F EXH STAC K TEMP DEG F EXH GAS FLOW CFM 1,200 915 4,002.74 286.74 0.34 43.98 148.82 61.03 1,797.52 1,166 856.76 4,594.44 1,200 823 3,602.24 258.03 0.34 40.23 148.46 55.02 1,677.45 1,147.28 849.2 4,266.02 1,200 732 3,202.49 229.31 0.35 36.48 148.28 49.01 1,557.38 1,128.38 842.36 3,937.59 1,200 686 3,001.87 215.09 0.35 34.61 148.28 45.99 1,497.34 1,119.02 839.3 3,775.14 1,200 640 2,801.99 200.74 0.36 32.6 148.28 42.11 1,419.65 1,108.94 836.24 3,570.32 1,200 549 2,401.5 172.02 0.36 28.58 148.28 34.32 1,260.73 1,085.9 830.48 3,157.13 1,200 457 2,001.74 143.3 0.37 24.46 148.28 26.53 1,105.35 1,058.9 824.54 2,747.48 1,200 366 1,601.24 114.73 0.39 20.34 147.74 19.66 967.62 998.96 795.38 2,351.96 1,200 274 1,200.75 86.01 0.41 16.14 147.02 13.5 844.02 904.64 741.02 1,959.97 1,200 229 1,000.87 71.65 0.43 14 146.48 10.72 787.52 844.52 703.94 1,762.2 1,200 183 800.25 57.29 0.45 11.78 145.76 8.23 734.55 759.56 642.2 1,557.38 1,200 91 400.5 28.72 0.55 7.21 143.96 4 635.66 547.52 480.56 1,140.66 General Performance Data 2 ENGIN E SPEED RPM ENGIN E POWE R BHP COMPRES S OUT PRESS IN-HG COMPRES S OUT TEMP DEG F 1,200 915 61.6 360.5 1,200 823 55.55 338.54 1,200 732 49.48 316.4 1,200 686 46.46 305.42 1,200 640 42.52 289.76 1,200 549 34.68 258.62 1,200 457 26.83 227.3 1,200 366 19.93 196.34 1,200 274 13.74 165.74 1,200 229 10.96 150.62 1,200 183 8.5 137.3 1,200 91 4.26 113 Engine Heat Rejection Data ENGIN E SPEED RPM ENGIN E POWE R BHP REJ TO JW BTU/M N REJ TO ATMO S BTU/M N REJ TO EXHAUS T BTU/MN EXH RCOV TO 350F BTU/M N FROM OIL CLR BTU/M N FROM AFT CLR BTU/M N WORK ENERG Y BTU/M N LHV ENERG Y BTU/M N HHV ENERGY BTU/MN 1,200 915 15,241.1 6,426.3 33,155.1 17,174.7 4,720.2 6,767.5 38,785.3 94,176.5 100,318.5 1,200 823 14,331.2 6,255.7 30,539.1 15,753.0 4,316.4 5,743.9 34,918.1 86,157.9 91,788.0 1,200 732 13,478.2 6,028.2 27,980.0 14,445.0 3,912.6 4,720.2 31,051.0 78,139.2 83,200.6 1,200 686 13,023.2 5,97 1.3 26,728.8 13,762.5 3,713.6 4,208.4 29,117.4 74,101.5 78,935.4 1,200 640 12,511.4 5,857.6 25,250.2 12,966.3 3,497.5 3,639.7 27,126.9 69,893.1 74,442.7 1,200 549 11,487.7 5,630.1 22,236.1 11,374.0 3,065.3 2,616.0 23,259.8 61,248.9 65,229.8 1,200 457 10,350.3 5,402.6 19,165.2 9,781.6 2,627.4 1,535.5 19,392.6 52,434.0 55,846.2 1,200 366 9,156.0 4,890.8 16,037.3 8,018.6 2,183.8 796.2 15,525.5 43,562.3 46,405.8 1,200 274 7,848.0 4,265.2 12,795.7 6,085.1 1,728.8 284.4 11,658.3 34,576.9 36,794.8 1,200 229 7,165.6 3,867.1 11,146.5 5,118.3 1,501.4 56.9 9,724.8 29,970.4 31,960.9 1,200 183 6,369.4 3,525.9 9,326.7 3,867.1 1,262.5 -113.7 7,734.3 25,250.2 26,899.4 1,200 91 4,663.3 2,729.8 5,573.2 1,478.6 773.4 -341.2 3,867.1 15,468.6 16,492.3