HomeMy WebLinkAboutNMFS-Connellyoat�S"T°`` UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Marine Fisheries Service
}moo sT4res OF P�P.O. Box 21668
Juneau, Alaska 99802-1668
November 21, 2002
The Honorable Magalie R. Salas, Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20426
RE:Project No. 12236-000 and 12238-000 (Connally Lake Project)
Dear Secretary Sales:
Enclosed for filing in the reference proceeding is the
National Marine Fisheries Service's Motion to Intervene.
Copies have been served on the Applicant.
Sincerely,
s
Lt`vL'L
Tom Meyer
Staff Attorney
Office of General Council
Enclosures: Original + 8 copies
P GPN� TM OSPh.EgC
O�
2
QV
�Eq
RTMErri OF C��
AI.ASK A RFGION - www fakrnonn om
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Projects )
Competing Preliminary Permit Applications ) FERC Project Nos. 12336-000 and 12338-000
Haines, Alaska )
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
MOTION TO INTERVENE
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is considering competing preliminary
permit applications submitted by the Alaska Power and Telephone Company (Alaska Power): and
Pacific Energy for licensing the Connelly Lake Hydroelectric Projects, located in Haines Borough,
Alaska. Pursuant to the FERC notice dated September 27, 2002, the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) hereby moves to intervene in the above matter, in accordance with 18 C.F.R.
385.214. The following represents NMFS's motion to intervene in these proceedings for the purpose of
reservation of authority pursuant to section 18 of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 811, and essential fish habitat
(EFH) conservation recommendations pursuant to section 305(b) of the Magnuson Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson -Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1855.
Service of process and other communications concerning this Motion should be made to:
James W. Balsiger
Regional Administrator
National Marine Fisheries Service
Juneau, Alaska
I. INTEREST OF THE PETITIONER
Petitioner NMFS is entrusted with Federal jurisdiction over marine, estuaries, and anadromous
fishery resources. On October 3,1970, the President established within the United States Department of
Commerce "an agency which shall be known as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) ...." Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, 3 C.F.R. 203 (1970 compilation), reprinted in 5 U.S.C.
Appendix R at 64 (1970). Under the Reorganization Plan, nearly all the functions vested bylaw within the
Bureau of Commercial Fisheries of the Department of the Interior, including those pertinent to these
proceedings, were transferred to the Secretary of Commerce to be exercised through NOAA. NMFS
was established by NOAA to exercise the functions formerly carried out by the Bureau of Commercial
Fisheries, 35 Fed. Reg. 1845 5 (1970).
By virtue of this delegation of authority, NMFS is responsible for oversight and evaluation of
activities which may affect marine, estuaries, and anadromous fishery resources. In order to assure "equal
consideration" of fish and wildlife with other purposes, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,16 U.S. C.
661-666(c), requires that NMFS be consulted "whenever the waters of any stream or other body of water
are proposed or authorized to be impounded ... for any purpose whatever ... by any public or private
agency underFederal permit or license such consultation is intended to prevent loss and damage to fish and
wildlife resources and to develop and improve those resources."
NOAA's Habitat Conservation Policy, published in the November 25,1983, Federal Register, 48
Fed. Reg. 53142, provides further direction for NMFS where anadromous fish and their habitat are
concerned. Anadromous fish and the preservation of their habitat are specifically identified as priorities for
NMFS.
2
Section 100) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), (16 U.S.C. 8030)), authorizes NMFS to recommend
license conditions necessary to protect, mitigate damage to, and enhance fish and wildlife (including
spawning habitat) affected by the project. Section 18 of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 811) gives NMFS authority
to provide mandatory fishway prescriptions. NMFS's general statutory authority for the protection of
marine, estuaries, and anadromous fishery resources also derives from the Anadromous Fish Conservation
Act, 16 U.S.C. 757(a), the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq., the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq, and the Pacific Salmon
Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 3631-3644.
If. PUBLIC INTEREST AS GROUNDS FOR INTERVENTION
Rule 214 of FERC procedures provide for intervention if the entity's participation is in the public
interest, 18 C.F.R. 285.214(b)(2)(iii). The statutes cited above in "I" are Congressional statements of
the national public interest in the protection of aquatic resources. These statutes reflect Congress' intent
that NMFS represent those interests. as they pertain to marine, estuary and anadromous fishery
resources. Fishery interests would be affected by the activities covered by the preliminary permit
applications. Therefore, intervention by NMFS is in the public interest and will ensure that NMFS is
able to provide measures for fish protection, and that its statutory interests are addressed adequately
during the licensing process.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE TWO COMPETING PROPOSED PROJECTS
Both projects are described in the FERC notice dated September 27, 2002:
The Connelly Lake project proposed by Alaska Power would be operated as a storage project
and would consist of: (1) a 48-foot-high, 575-foot-long rockfill dam at the lake outlet, (2) Connelly
Lake, which would have a minimum water surface elevation of 2,280 feet, its current level, and a
maximum water surface elevation of 2,312 feet, (3) a screened intake structure at elevation 2,270, (4) a
6,188-foot-long penstock, 48-inch-diameter to a valve house with an auxiliary release adjacent to the
dam, then 30-inch-diameter penstock, (5) a powerhouse containing one generating unit with an installed
capacity of 6.2 MW, (6) a 14-mile-long, 34.5 kilovolt underground transmission line connecting to an
existing power line, and (7) appurtenant facilities.
The Connelly Lake project proposed by Pacific Energy would be operated in a run -of -river
mode and would consist of: (1) a proposed 50-foot-high, 575-foot-long rockfill dam at the lake outlet,
(2) Connelly Lake, with a surface area of 150 acres at normal water surface elevation of 2,280 feet, (3)
a 6,200-foot-long, 30-inch-diameter penstock, (4) a powerhouse containing one generating unit with an
installed capacity of 6.0 NW, (5) a 15-mile-long, 34.5-kilovolt transmission line connecting to an
existing power line, and (6) appurtenant facilities.
IV. AFFECTED FISHERY RESOURCES
1. Anadromous Fish: The unnamed creek flowing from Connelly Lake (Alaska Department of
Fish and Game Anadromous Stream Catalog #5-33-10200-2016) supports spawning and rearing
populations of coho salmon and Dolly Varden char. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has
identified approximately 0.25 miles of anadromous fish habitat within this stream. Besides providing
spawning habitat for stocks originating in this reach, this reach provides feeding and resting habitat and
refuge for mainstem stocks during periods of high flows and other adverse conditions. The unnamed
stream enters the Chilkoot River, which supports migration and spawning of coho and sockeye salmon
and Dolly Varden char within the Haines Bald Eagle Preserve.
4
2. Essential Fish Habitat: Affected anadromous streams, including the Chilkoot River, support
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for anadromous fish species. The proposed action is likely to adversely
affect EFH.
V. PROJECT IMPACTS
1. Construction Impacts: Among potential project impacts, both proposed projects would
require construction or reconstruction of access roads, diversion structures, penstocks, and
powerhouse that could result in erosion, stream sedimentation, and increased turbidity. Sedimentation
of spawning gravels downstream of the project could reduce egg and fry survival. Construction
activities could result in dewatering of fish habitat. Diversion structures could limit or prevent fish
migration and passage and result in a loss of gravel recruitment that is critical to downstream spawning
habitats.
2. Operational Impacts: Among the potential operational impacts, the project proposed by
Alaska Power would require impoundment and control of flow regimes. The bypass reach includes
habitat used by salmon that are important to the Chilkoot River fishery. Diversion of water around the
bypass reach could result in permanent loss of spawning habitat and loss of anadromous fish
populations within this stream. Dewatering of the bypass reach would reduce available habitat used by
resident and anadromous mainstem fish populations. Failure to maintain adequate instream flows due to
operation of either proposed project could result in dewatering of spawning redds and loss of fish
populations within this stream. Construction of a powerhouse at the confluence of the Chilkoot River
could result in false attraction of adult salmon migrating to spawning sites. Construction and operation
of either proposed project could result in additional impacts to anadromous fisheries that cannot be
ascertained from the scoping documents and require the completion of additional studies.
VI.. POSITION OF THE PETITIONER
In requesting intervener status, NMFS seeks status to become a party to the proceeding.
Connelly Lake outlet stream is an important anadromous fish steam. Important EFH is located within
the reach above the proposed powerhouse sites that could be adversely affected by project
construction and operation. Pursuant to Section 100) and Section 18 of the FPA, NMFS reserves its
responsibility to request appropriate studies, provide appropriate license terms and conditions and
prescribe any necessary fishways to protect EFH and our trust resources.
VII.. MOTION TO INTERVENE
NMFS moves to intervene in this proceeding and requests that any license issued in this
proceeding incorporate license terms and conditions that we may develop during the licensing process
including a reservation of authority for NMFS to prescribe any fishways necessary for the protection of
the anadromous fish resources of the Connelly Lake drainage.
Dated this 21 day of November 2002.
Respectfully submitted,
FOR THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Thomas J. Meyer
NOAA General Counsel
Alaska Region
6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Project No. 12336-000 and 12338-000 )
Competing Preliminary Permit Applications ) Docket No. P-12336-000
Connelly Lake Projects ) P-12338-000
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day served, by Federal Express Mail, a copy of the National
Marine Fisheries Service's Preliminary Motion To Intervene in the encaptioned action on the
applicant to this proceeding, in accordance with the Commission's Rules of Practice and .
Procedure.
DATED this 21st day of November 2002 in Juneau, Alaska.
Janet R. Herr
Administrative Support
for Habitat Conservation
National Marine Fisheries Service
Juneau, Alaska