Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCoffman Cove Wood Boiler App      Southeast Island School District | Box 19569 | Thorne Bay, AK 99919   Renewable Energy Fund    Howard Valentine School, Coffman Cove, AK      November 08 Grant Application  Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 1 of 14 9/2/2008 Application Forms and Instructions The following forms and instructions are provided for preparing your application for a Renewable Energy Fund Grant. An electronic version of the Request for Applications (RFA) and the forms are available online at http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE_Fund.html The following application forms are required to be submitted for a grant recommendation: Grant Application Form GrantApp.doc Application form in MS Word that includes an outline of information required to submit a complete application. Applicants should use the form to assure all information is provided and attach additional information as required. Application Cost Worksheet Costworksheet.doc Summary of Cost information that should be addressed by applicants in preparing their application. Grant Budget Form GrantBudget.xls A detailed grant budget that includes a breakdown of costs by task and a summary of funds available and requested to complete the work for which funds are being requested. Grant Budget Form Instructions GrantBudgetInstr.pdf Instructions for completing the above grant budget form.  If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application forms for each project.  Multiple phases for the same project may be submitted as one application.  If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide a plan and grant budget for completion of each phase.  If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.  If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed. REMINDER:  Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act, AS 40.25 and materials submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no statutory exemptions apply.  All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final recommendations are made to the legislature. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 2 of 14 9/3/2008 SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal) Southeast Island School District - For Howard Valentine School, Coffman Cove, AK Type of Entity: School District Mailing Address PO Box 19569 Thorne Bay, AK 99919 Physical Address 1218A Shoreline Drive Thorne Bay AK 99919 Telephone (907) 828- 8254 Fax (907) 828 -8257 Email lburch@sisd.org or cpage@sisd.org or emosenthin@sisd.org 1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT Name Liz Mosenthin Title Federal and State Grant Coordinator Mailing Address PO Box 19569 Thorne Bay, AK 99919 Telephone 907 828- 8254 Fax 907 828 -8257 Email emosenthin@sisd.org 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your application will be rejected. 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or An independent power producer, or A local government, or X A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities); Yes X 1.2.2. Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If a collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s governing authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box ) Yes X 1.2.3. As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant agreement. Yes X 1.2.4. If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the application.) Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 3 of 14 9/3/2008 SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY Provide a brief 1-2 page overview of your project. 2.1 PROJECT TYPE Describe the type of project you are proposing, (Reconnaissance; Resource Assessment/ Feasibility Analysis/Conceptual Design; Final Design and Permitting; and/or Construction) as well as the kind of renewable energy you intend to use. Refer to Section 1.5 of RFA. The Southeast Island School District (SISD) request is for Phase II–Resource Assessment/Feasibility Analysis/Conceptual Design, Phase III−Final Design and Permitting, Phase IV−Construction funding of a cordwood-fired hydronic heating system to supplement the oil-fired heating system in the Howard Valentine School in Coffman Cove, Alaska. 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a one paragraph description of your project. At a minimum include the project location, communities to be served, and who will be involved in the grant project. The wood fired supplemental heating system would be located at the Howard Valentine School Site in the City of Coffman Cove on Prince of Wales Island in Southeast Alaska. The project would also serve the residents of the City of Coffman Cove. The entities involved in this project would be Southeast Island School District, a design engineering firm, local contractors, and the Alaska Energy Authority. We would rely on Alaska Energy Authority for guidance with the project. The use of wood biomass (cordwood) to heat the school will replace 85% of the fuel oil consumption. The project involves placing one thermal storage type wood-fired hydronic heating unit adjacent to the school site and running underground insulated pipes from the wood- fired heater to interface with the school’s heating system. Heat energy from biomass will significantly decrease heating costs for the school. Wood is available from waste from local saw mills, USFS small sales, from wood left behind in landings, and from small local firewood cutters. 2.3 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source of other contributions to the project. Include a project cost summary that includes an estimated total cost through construction. The total project cost is $355,056. The source of funds will be the state Renewable Energy grant of $341,056, with an SISD in-kind contribution of $14,000 in labor. Project costs include:  Engineering: $35,700 – Resource assessment – Feasibility Analysis – Design - Permitting  Building Construction: $212,600.  Heat Transfer System: $15,000 – Connecting piping – Heat System Interface  Project Management by AEA term contractor: $35,700.  In-Kind Labor by two school district maintenance personnel: $14,000 (4 wk@60 hr/wk)  20% contingency: $59,176. 2.4 PROJECT BENEFIT Briefly discuss the financial benefits that will result from this project, including an estimate of economic benefits(such as reduced fuel costs) and a description of other benefits to the Alaskan public. SISD will save $23,865 in heating costs the first year by replacing costly fuel oil with locally available cordwood. Money that has previously left the community in the form of payments to the heating fuel provider will be invested locally. The contract for providing wood could be split among a several families, providing supplemental income. The contract for the supplying wood could be the impetus to start a small business that would hire local people. The money Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 4 of 14 9/3/2008 earned can be used to purchase housing, groceries, fuel, food and other economic goods and services. The $23,865 saved by SISD would go back to the general fund and would be used to purchase a number of items: part of a teacher’s salary, aide time for the school site or educational materials for the schools. Families would remain in the town when jobs are created, and the schools remain open. Schools are the center of community wellness in many ways. With low-cost heat we can open the school gym to nightly activities. Open gym gives students and adults some place to go and something to do. Communities become healthier, where community members can use fitness equipment, play volleyball, and help students with archery, and basketball tournaments and hold community events in the gym. Without these options people find ways to entertain themselves not always positive - getting into trouble and that is costly for society, both locally and for the state when they end up incarcerated. 2.5 PROJECT COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY Include a summary of your project’s total costs and benefits below. 2.5.1 Total Project Cost (Including estimates through construction.) $ 355,056 2.5.2 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $ 341,056 2.5.3 Other Funds to be provided (Project match) $ 14,000 2.5.4 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.5.2 and 2.5.3) $ 355,056 2.5.5 Estimated Benefit (Savings) $ 23,865 2.5.6 Public Benefit (If you can calculate the benefit in terms of dollars please provide that number here and explain how you calculated that number in your application.) $ 23,865 per year savings Simple payback = $355,056/23,865 = 14.9 yr Cost/Benefit ratio, adjusted for inflation is 9.8 years See Biomass Evaluation Spreadsheet (attachment No. 1) See also section 2.4 above for public benefits. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 5 of 14 9/3/2008 SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application. 3.1 Project Manager Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include a resume and references for the manager(s). If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management Support. If the applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government entity, state that in this section. SISD is requesting that AEA oversee the project on behalf of the District. It is anticipated that AEA will utilize its wood heat term contractor to manage the project. 3.2 Project Schedule Include a schedule for the proposed work that will be funded by this grant. (You may include a chart or table attachment with a summary of dates below.) See Gantt Chart (Attachment No. 2) 3.3 Project Milestones Define key tasks and decision points in your project and a schedule for achieving them. See Milestones on attached Gantt Chart (Attachment No. 2) Milestone 1: Phase 1−Reconnaissance. This phase is complete; a report has been issued. Milestone 2: Complete and submit AEA grant application. Nov. 10, 2008. Milestone 3: Grant award and NTP. July 1, 2009. Milestone 4. Phase 2−Resource Assessment/Feasibility Analysis/35% Design. This will be done by AEA Term Contractor. Completed Aug 18, 2009. Milestone 5. Phase 3−Final Design. Plan set to 100%. Get Approval to Construct from Alaska Fire Marshal. This will be done by AEA Term Contractor. Nov. 26, 2009. Milestone 6. Phase 4−Construction phase complete. Construction done by force account using local labor, or subcontracts, managed by AEA Term Contractor. July 30, 2010. Note: The timeline depends upon when the notice to proceed is given and the funds are available from AEA 3.4 Project Resources Describe the personnel, contractors, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an attachment to your application. Key Personnel for School District Lauren Burch, Superintendent Southeast Island School District - Project Overview Lucienne Smith Business Manager for Southeast School District – Financial Reporting Liz Mosenthin – federal and state grant coordinator – Grant procedures and paperwork Preliminary feasibility Study ( Phase 1 already occurred) Dan Parrent, Resource Assessment/ Feasibility Analysis/Conceptual Design study completed (Phase I) completed November 2, 2008 Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 6 of 14 9/3/2008 Process for major equipment purchase or contracts. These components will be handled by AEA procurement rules and Purchase Orders. Procurement to be done by AEA wood heat term contractor with AEA issued Purchase Orders. 3.5 Project Communications Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status. The site maintenance supervisor will produce a daily report on the status of the project. The weekly status summary will be reported to the supervisor and head of maintenance and summarized for the School Board’s monthly packet, this in turn will be sent to the AEA on a monthly or weekly basis as required/requested by the Alaska Energy Authority. Maintenance work logs and work orders will be maintained at the District Office. A monthly financial report is required for the School Board on all projects, along with a grant report. These reports detail expenditures and progress for the school board and the Superintendent. A copy of the School Board minutes and the school board packet are housed at the SISD District Office and will be available on the SISD Website for viewing. 3.6 Project Risk Discuss potential problems and how you would address them. Potential Problem How Problem is addressed Barges don’t make scheduled delivery runs Order materials well ahead of need. Allow for freight delays. Unforeseen Price over runs due to increased fuel, metal or barge line shipping or other prices 20% contingency included in project for unstable prices and costs. Delays in manufacture of the wood fired boilers Order heating unit as soon as plans are approved. It may be possible to order unit early in Phase 2, with permission of AEA. Other administrative, logistical, subcontractor, procurement problem. AEA term contractor will make detailed task and scheduling chart (Microsoft Project or other project tracking program) and monitor progress to anticipate potential problems and deal with them before they become critical. SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS  Tell us what the project is and how you will meet the requirements outlined in Section 2 of the RFA. The level of information will vary according to phase of the project you propose to undertake with grant funds.  If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project provide a plan and grant budget for completion of each phase.  If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 7 of 14 9/3/2008 The United States Forest Service (USFS) recently published a map and reconnaissance report ( See Appendix A attached) The potential wood resources available for the school district is 5000 cords. That is the equivalent of well over 61 years supply. There are also other private sources of wood available, along with waste wood from the local saw mills. Pros: the school is located in the heart of the Tongass National Forest, the largest forest in the nation. Wood sources are located close to the City of Coffman Cove. Transportation of wood to school district is reasonable since wood sources are located nearby. Wood can be obtained and stored for up to a year or more ahead of time, ensuring a reliable and reasonable source of energy. It is a renewable source of energy. Wood is an organic, non contaminating, biodegradable renewable material. Cons: Cordwood takes up more room than fuel oil, and needs a larger dry storage area. It also requires more manual labor than turning a switch; it also generates ash which needs to be disposed of. Item Pros Cons Continues Using Fuel Oil – don’t supplement with wood fired boilers. Requires no changes to existing heating system at the school and doesn’t create any new industries in Southeast Alaska, Prince of Wales or local towns. High fuel prices, money leaves community, no local job created, fluctuating fuel oil prices create no stability for estimating budgets, no economic development – families leave communities, schools close. Wood source Locally available - Saw mills, slash piles, thinning projects, wood sources located on Prince of Wales, in and near Coffman Cove. Renewable nontoxic, energy source, After years and years of use, easy access to the wood sources could necessitate farther travel and increase the cost. New wood products developed A wood pellet industry could be developed on Prince of Wales Island and offer a cheaper supplemental product for purchase to be used in Biomass fired Boilers. A new business could be created in Coffman Cove delivering the product to homes and the school. Allows for partnership development among entities in Southeast Alaska and groups on Prince of Wales Island Transportation costs to get pellets to the school site might increase the fuel costs and reduce savings to school district. Priorities for product use may not favor rural and remote towns. Amount available 5000 cords available Renewable resources with potential to use species not considered such as Alder Some distant areas of harvest could be more than 50 miles from Coffman Cove. Might require and investment into new equipment to harvest new sources of wood biomass ( thinning for example) No information on amount of thinning residue available at this time Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 8 of 14 9/3/2008 Wood contracts Local people willing to bid contracts, creating jobs, and keeping families in small communities and children in community to keep small schools open. With local people supplying wood easy to contact them and follow up on contracts Competitive bid process might be awarded to an outside bidder who will raise the price of wood and decrease SISD savings. Requires deadline dates in the wood supplier’s contract and follow up by maintenance personnel to assure supply. Wood condition Lots of dead standing wood, and thinning slash, located close to Coffman Cove. Only requires short drying time for use of product. Has to be stored out of the weather ahead of time in order to reduce moisture content. Green wood will need to be stored for a longer period than dry wood, taking up more space 4.2 Existing Energy System 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation. The current system used to heat Coffman Cove School contains three oil-fired boilers. Each boiler produces 266,000 BTU’s per hour, for a total 798,000 btu/hr for the group of three. The boilers are less than one year old, and have an overall efficiency rating of 75% to 80%. 4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources. Adding a supplemental wood-fired hydronic heating system will have little impact on the existing biomass energy resource. Thorne Bay District Ranger, Jason Anderson, provided an attachment (Attachment No. 3) that shows areas with plenty of renewable biomass energy source. Removal of the trees allows more light to hit the forest floor and other trees will grow to replace the removed trees. In the case of slab wood from sawmills, wood-fired hydronic heaters can use wood that has in the past been stacked and left to rot. When the USFS offers small thinning sales, a contract to remove the thinned wood could remove wood that only ends up rotting on the forest floor and generates green house gasses. At this time very little of the thinned woods are used. The positive impacts: cutting wood for the school district will create a job that allows money to stay in the community and keep a family with children employed and living in Coffman Cove. When families stay in small towns, the schools remain open, SISD hires local people to work at the school, adding to the economic benefit of the community. 4.2.3 Existing Energy Market Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy customers. The existing energy resource is fuel oil that is used to heat the school. The current price is $4.46 per gallon for No. 2 fuel oil. The school will use approximately 10,000 gallons of fuel oil per year or $ 44,600. Switching from fuel oil to wood heat for 85% of the heating needs will have little or no impact on the people of Coffman Cove, since fuel oil for the school is purchased from an out-of-town distributor, and the money leaves the community. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 9 of 14 9/3/2008 4.3 Proposed System Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues. 4.3.1 System Design Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:  A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location  Optimum installed capacity  Anticipated capacity factor  Anticipated annual generation  Anticipated barriers  Basic integration concept  Delivery methods Description of renewable energy technology specific to project location: The proposed wood-fired hydronic heating system will provide building heat and domestic hot water to the Coffman Cove School. The heat source will consist of cordwood fired hydronic heater located in a pre-engineered insulated building (see Figures 1 and 2 of Wood Heat Building in Attachment No. 4). An adjacent fabric-covered structure will provide 2,200 sq ft of covered storage for one heating season of wood. Heat will be transferred from the heat building to the school mechanical room in a 50-ft long buried hydronic loop using flexible insulated Pex piping system such as Ecoflex. The building hydronic loop will be separated from the district heating loop with a heat exchanger to separate the non-pressurized wood-fired system from the building pressurized hydronic system. Because this is a cordwood fired system, it will use more operating labor than a system using bulk biofuel such as wood pellets or chips. To minimize the labor, cordwood would be packaged on half-cord skids or pallets and moved into the stoking area with a small skid steer loader such as a Bobcat. A cordwood fired hydronic heater would be selected with primary/ secondary combustion chambers and a large heat storage tank to maximize efficiency and minimize exhaust emissions. Optimum installed capacity and capacity factor: The system will be designed to displace 85% of the oil previously used in the facilities. This is done to reduce the cost of the project from overcapacity and to optimize system operation. The wood-fired hydronic unit is sized to handle 60% of peak load with 6-hr of heat storage between firings. Anticipated annual generation: The wood-fired hydronic system will produce an annual net output of 877,200,000 btu to the school, through batch firing of cordwood, coupled with thermal storage in the 3200 gallon hold- up volume of the heating unit. Annual wood use anticipated is 81 cords of wood to 30% moisture, wet basis. Anticipated Barriers: No potential barriers at this time. There is plenty of biomass available, and wintertime access is rarely hampered by snow. Basic Integration Concept: The heating systems will be connected to each other by a heat exchanger on the return side of the Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 10 of 14 9/3/2008 school hydronic system to separate the heat transfer fluids and system pressures. Delivery Method: The cordwood-fired heating system will deliver heat to the school mechanical system through a buried insulated hot water loop and a circulation pump. 4.3.2 Land Ownership Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues. The land for the project is owned by SISD. There are no potential land ownership issues. The School District supports the project. There are no access issues as the school district controls access to the site. See attached support letter in the form of a School Board Resolution (Attachment No. 5). Also see attached City of Coffman Cove resolution supporting the wood fired boilers. 4.3.3 Permits Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address outstanding permit issues.  List of applicable permits  Anticipated permitting timeline  Identify and discussion of potential barriers List of Permits: The only permit that is required would be the State Fire Marshal’s approval for a wood fired hydronic heating unit at the School location. Southeast Island School District has site control. Because of the small size of the heating unit, a DEC air quality permit will not be required. Timeline: Once the project has been funded and the mechanical drawings drafted we would proceed with the application for the Fire Marshall’s approval. The time line for Fire Marshal’s approval and permit is approximately 4 weeks. Barriers: A delay in the Fire Marshall granting approval of the project would cause a delay in the installation of the project. 4.3.4 Environmental Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be addressed:  Threatened or Endangered species  Habitat issues  Wetlands and other protected areas  Archaeological and historical resources  Land development constraints  Telecommunications interference  Aviation considerations  Visual, aesthetics impacts  Identify and discuss other potential barriers Threatened or Endangered Species: The school site has already been disturbed and filled with shot rock, and contains no threatened or endangered species at the locations. Habitat Issues: The school site has already been disturbed and filled with shot rock, and there are no habitat issues that would need to be addressed. Wetlands and other protected areas: The school is not located in a wetland or other protected area, as the area was filled with shot rock prior to school construction. Archaeological or Historical resources: The project area is not located where archaeological, cultural, or Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 11 of 14 9/3/2008 historical resources are located. Land Development Constraints: There are no land constraint issues at the Coffman School site. The School District owns the land surrounding the possible location of the wood fired heater building and there is plenty of land surrounding the areas. Telecommunications interference: There are no satellite dishes, phone lines, cell towers or cables in the areas selected for the wood fired boilers to interfere with telecommunications. Aviation considerations: The schools are located away from the seashore. All our aviation is conducted by float planes and the wood fired boilers would be located in an area that would not interfere with float plane operations. Visual and Aesthetics Impacts: The location selected for the wood fired boilers will have a minimal affect on the surrounding areas as the wood-fired hydronic heating units must be contained inside a building and fenced to keep people away from the area. Identify and discuss other potential barriers: Other barriers could include placing the project in an earthquake or tsunami potentials zone. Neither of these events would affect the students at the schools. The schools are located on one of the highest locations in town, away from tsunami danger, and the wood fired hydronic heater is self-contained in its own building away from the main school. Heat piping is underground and plumbed directly to the school boiler room, where students do not have access, so broken pipes are not an issue in the event of an earthquake. The proper wood-fired hydronic heaters have a high efficiency and low emissions, and meet or exceed current and anticipated EPA clean air requirements. 4.4 Proposed New System Costs (Total Estimated Costs and proposed Revenues) The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of their cost data. For example: Applicants Records or Analysis, Industry Standards, Consultant or Manufacturer’s estimates. 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the project. Cost information should include the following:  Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase  Requested grant funding  Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind  Identification of other funding sources  Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system  Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system The total project cost = $355,056 Requested grant funding = $341,056 Applicant matching funds = $14,000 (in-kind District Maintenance Labor) Identification of other funding sources = NA Projected capital cost of project = $307,300 Projected development cost of project = $47,756 Note: Contingencies are included in capital and development costs. 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the applicant.  Total anticipated project cost for this phase  Requested grant funding Operations and Maintenance costs for this proposed heating system are as follows:  Electricity for circulation pump, building lighting, and combustion fan: $505/yr Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 12 of 14 9/3/2008  Replacement parts for wood-fired heating system $300/yr  Labor costs are estimated at 242 hr/yr. This is a sunken cost, as firing will become part of the duties of the maintenance staff of the school. The total O & M costs for cordwood-fired hydronic heating system would be $805 to $1000/year. Grant funds will not be used for any O&M expense. The purpose of the grant is to get a renewable energy heating system into the school and on line as soon as possible. 4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale The power purchase/sale information should include the following:  Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s)  Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range  Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project The heat generated is not sold to anyone, but will just be used in the school. It is part of the operations of the Coffman Cove School. 4.4.4 Cost Worksheet Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in evaluating the project. Download the form, complete it, and submit it as an attachment. Document any conditions or sources your numbers are based on here. The budget form is attached. Costs are based upon numbers of similar construction in Southeast Alaska (Attachment No. 6). 4.4.5 Business Plan Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a minimum proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered. Plan for Operations of the new Heating System The cordwood-fired hydronic heating system will be just another heating source of the Coffman Cove School. SISD will continue to fund a maintenance person who will be responsible for stoking the hydronic heating unit on a daily basis and a plan in place to cover the operating and maintenance tasks along with additional funds to cover associated costs for operation and maintenance of the cordwood-fired hydronic heating system. The funds for purchasing the needed wood source will be part of school O&M costs. These costs will result in a net annual savings of over $23,865 in the first year of operations. 4.4.6 Analysis and Recommendations Provide information about the economic analysis and the proposed project. Discuss your recommendation for additional project development work. Dan Parrent from the Juneau Economic Development Committee visited Howard Valentine School in Coffman Cove in October and made a Reconnaissance; Resource Assessment/economic analysis of the proposed project. His recommendation was to place a Garn or similar wood fired hydronic heating unit (high efficiency, low emissions) at the site. His report is attached (Attachment No. 9). In addition, a simplified economic analysis was run on a spreadsheet to see how operations of the system would work (Attachment No. 1). Using cordwood to take care of 85% of the fuel oil needs of the school would result in a savings of $23,865 per year. Another spreadsheet (biomass Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 13 of 14 9/3/2008 evaluation) was run to determine the total savings over time and the cost/benefit ratio. It was found that using wood to heat the school resulted in a net saving of $1.28 million over 20 years. It took about 9.8 years for the cost/benefit ratio to equal 1.0, which is an excellent indicator of the economic viability of this project. The spreadsheets are found in Attachment No. 1. SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following:  Potential annual fuel displacement (gal and $) over the lifetime of the evaluated renewable energy project  Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price, RCA tariff, or avoided cost of ownership)  Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits)  Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or programs that might be available)  Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project The potential annual fuel displacement is 8,500 gallons per year. Over 20 years, this would amount to 170,000 gallons, or a net savings of $1.28 million. Assuming a life of 30 years for the wood-fired heating unit, fuel saved would be 255,000 gallons, with a net savings of $3.63 million. Non-economic public benefits would be a very low carbon footprint, and a much lower dependence upon fossil fuels. Money used for fuel oil purchases would stay in the community, providing local employment and income. SECTION 6 – GRANT BUDGET Tell us how much your total project costs. Include any investments to date and funding sources, how much is requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an applicant. Include an estimate of budget costs by tasks using the form - GrantBudget.xls Provide a narrative summary regarding funding sources and your financial commitment to the project. The total project cost is $355,056. The grant fund request is $341,056. The bulk of the funding for this project will come from an AEA Renewable Energy grant. SISD will provide $14,000 in in-kind match for the project through SISD-paid labor for two SISD maintenance workers in the construction of the facility. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 14 of 14 9/3/2008 SECTION 7 – ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WITH YOUR APPLICATION: A. Resumes of Applicant’s Project Manager, key staff, partners, consultants, and suppliers per application form Section 3.1 and 3.4 B. Cost Worksheet per application form Section 4.4.4 C. Grant Budget Form per application form Section 6. D. An electronic version of the entire application per RFA Section 1.6 E. Governing Body Resolution per RFA Section 1.4 Enclose a copy of the resolution or other formal action taken by the applicant’s governing body or management that: - authorizes this application for project funding at the match amounts indicated in the application - authorizes the individual named as point of contact to represent the applicant for purposes of this application - states the applicant is in compliance with all federal state, and local, laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations. F. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that this application for a renewable energy grant is truthful and correct, and that the applicant is in compliance with, and will continue to comply with, all federal and state laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations. Print Name Signature Title Date See next page for signatures.       ATTACHMENT NO. 1 BENEFIT/COST RATIO SPREADSHEETCOFFMAN COVE SCHOOLReal Discount Rate 4.0%Inflation Rate, Wood5.0%Inflation Rate, Oil8.0%SiteTotal Capital Cost Estimate/Pre-Const$355,056Sunk Costs- Project Cost/Pre-construction cost$355,056w/o Proj w/ ProjGallons fuel oil consumed, hot water 10,000 1,500Cords wood per year81 Est. cap cost, wood fired system$355,056Fuel oil cost, $/gallon $4.46 $4.46Gross fuel cost (savings) $44,600 $37,910Less: Wood cost, per cord $175Total annual wood cost $14,175Equal net fuel cost savings $23,735Less: labor, boilers, wood, hours/year 242 0.66 <=Hrs/Day/365Labor/cost per hour $25Total labor cost $0Sunk cost. Maintenance personnel assigned duty to fuel heater as part of daily tasks.Net potential annual savings $23,735As Proposed:Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Costs W/O ProjectGallons fuel oil consumed, hot water 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Fuel oil cost, $/gallon $4.46 $4.82 $5.20 $5.62 $6.07 $6.55 $7.08 $7.64 $8.26 $8.92 $9.63 $10.40 $11.23 $12.13 $13.10 $14.15 $15.28 $16.50Subtotal - Costs W/O Project $44,600 $48,168 $52,021 $56,183 $60,678 $65,532 $70,775 $76,437 $82,551 $89,156 $96,288 $103,991 $112,310 $121,295 $130,999 $141,479 $152,797 $165,021Costs WITH ProjectGallons fuel oil consumed, hot water 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Fuel oil cost, $/gallon $4.46 $4.82 $5.20 $5.62 $6.07 $6.55 $7.08 $7.64 $8.26 $8.92 $9.63 $10.40 $11.23 $12.13 $13.10 $14.15 $15.28 $16.50Subtotal - Costs WITH Project $6,690 $7,225 $7,803 $8,427 $9,102 $9,830 $10,616 $11,465 $12,383 $13,373 $14,443 $15,599 $16,847 $18,194 $19,650 $21,222 $22,920 $24,753Gross Fuel Savings $37,910 $40,943 $44,218 $47,756 $51,576 $55,702 $60,158 $64,971 $70,169 $75,782 $81,845 $88,392 $95,464 $103,101 $111,349 $120,257 $129,877 $140,268Less: Wood Costs $14,175 $14,884 $15,628 $16,409 $17,230 $18,091 $18,996 $19,946 $20,943 $21,990 $23,090 $24,244 $25,456 $26,729 $28,066 $29,469 $30,942 $32,489Less: Labor Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Less: Electricity Costs $505 $530 $557 $585 $614 $645 $677 $711 $746 $783 $823 $864 $907 $952 $1,000 $1,050 $1,102 $1,157Less: Maintenance Costs $300 $315 $331 $347 $365 $383 $402 $422 $443 $465 $489 $513 $539 $566 $594 $624 $655 $688Total Net Savings from project $22,930 $25,214 $27,703 $30,414 $33,368 $36,584 $40,084 $43,893 $48,036 $52,543 $57,444 $62,772 $68,562 $74,854 $81,690 $89,115 $97,178 $105,933Cumulative Savings $22,930 $48,144 $75,847 $106,261 $139,629 $176,212 $216,296 $260,189 $308,225 $360,769 $418,213 $480,984 $549,546 $624,400$706,090 $795,204 $892,382 $998,316Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.06 0.14 0.21 0.30 0.39 0.50 0.61 0.73 0.87 1.02 1.18 1.35 1.55 1.76 1.99 2.24 2.51 2.81 Cheesh-na Tribal Council, ChistochinaProjectApplication Preconstruction services to determine cost effectiveness of a wood-fired hot water system, community buildings owned by Cheesh-na Tribal Council, Chistochina Page 1 of 2 BENEFIT/COST RATIO SPREADSHEETCOFFMAN COVE SCHOOLReal Discount RateInflation Rate, WoodInflation Rate, OilSiteTotal Capital Cost Estimate/Pre-ConstSunk CostsProject Cost/Pre-construction costGallons fuel oil consumed, hot waterCords wood per yearEst. cap cost, wood fired systemFuel oil cost, $/gallonGross fuel cost (savings)Less: Wood cost, per cordTotal annual wood costEqual net fuel cost savingsLess: labor, boilers, wood, hours/yearLabor/cost per hourTotal labor costNet potential annual savingsAs Proposed:PeriodYearCosts W/O ProjectGallons fuel oil consumed, hot waterFuel oil cost, $/gallonSubtotal - Costs W/O ProjectCosts WITH ProjectGallons fuel oil consumed, hot waterFuel oil cost, $/gallonSubtotal - Costs WITH ProjectGross Fuel SavingsLess: Wood CostsLess: Labor CostsLess: Electricity CostsLess: Maintenance CostsTotal Net Savings from projectCumulative SavingsBenefit/Cost RatioProject19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 302026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 203710,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $17.82 $19.25 $20.79 $22.45 $24.25 $26.19 $28.28 $30.54 $32.99 $35.63 $38.48 $41.56$178,222 $192,480 $207,879 $224,509 $242,470 $261,867 $282,817 $305,442 $329,877 $356,268 $384,769 $415,5501,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 $17.82 $19.25 $20.79 $22.45 $24.25 $26.19 $28.28 $30.54 $32.99 $35.63 $38.48 $41.56$26,733 $28,872 $31,182 $33,676 $36,370 $39,280 $42,422 $45,816 $49,482 $53,440 $57,715 $62,333$151,489 $163,608 $176,697 $190,833 $206,099 $222,587 $240,394 $259,626 $280,396 $302,827 $327,054 $353,218$34,114 $35,820 $37,610 $39,491 $41,466 $43,539 $14,175 $14,175 $14,175 $14,175 $14,175 $14,175$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,215 $1,276 $1,340 $1,407 $1,477 $1,551 $1,629 $1,710 $1,796 $1,885 $1,980 $2,079$722 $758 $796 $836 $878 $921 $968 $1,016 $1,067 $1,120 $1,176 $1,235$115,438 $125,755 $136,950 $149,099 $162,279 $176,576 $223,623 $242,725 $263,358 $285,647 $309,723 $335,729$1,113,754 $1,239,508 $1,376,459 $1,525,557 $1,687,836 $1,864,412 $2,088,035 $2,330,760 $2,594,118 $2,879,765 $3,189,488 $3,525,2173.14 3.49 3.88 4.30 4.75 5.25 5.88 6.56 7.31 8.11 8.98 9.93 Page 2 of 2 COFFMAN COVE SCHOOLWOOD HEAT ANALYSIS USING 8% ANNUAL FUEL COST ESCALATIONWood-Fired Hydronic Heater Simple Economic AnalysisWood Heat Data:flu temp 270 FAMC30%bt70FAverage MC30%amb temp70FFuel Oil Data:Cost of wood:$175/cord$/cord1 cord =100 Cubic Ft SWEApprox. Annual Fuel Cons:10,000gallons 1 Cubic Ft SWE: 30.5 OD lbsEst'd Recovered Heat Avail:0gallons Wood Energy Content: 8515 Btu/lb (OD)Net Annual Fuel Consump:10,000gallons Wood used per year: 81 cordsFuel Energy Content: 134,000Btu/gallon #1Wood used per year: 52 (BDT)Cost of Oil$4.46/gal$/gallon Btu/lb wood @ MC: 30.0%5586Btu/lbTotal Annual Cost of Heat $44,600 per yearNet Annual Cost of Oil: $44,600 per year cost of oil usedCost of wood: $14,132$/YearTotal Annual Energy Use: 1,340 MMBtu/year Annual Wood Energy Use: 1,376 MMBtu/year - Gross into BurnerNet Annual Oil Energy Use: 1,340 MMBtu/yrnet of Recvd HtWood Boiler Efficiency75%Oil Boiler Efficiency77%Wood Energy Content: 17.04 MMBtu/cord - wet basisNet Annual Oil Boiler Output: 1,032 MMBtu/yearWood Weight at MC: 30.0% 1.46 tons/green cordWdWihttMC30 0%118t/Wood Weight at MC:30.0%118green tons/yearHeating Degree Days:8104F-Days/yr97.5% Design Temp:17FQ peak: (NET into water) 255 MBh Based on HDD and Approx. Annual Fuel Consumption0.6 x Q peak: (into water) 153 MBh Estimate 80% - 90% of Fuel Oil Saved at 60% of Peak LoadQ from Recvd Heat:0MBh From HRU.XLS spreadsheetWdBilSt153MBhWdBilPkHtit tWood Boiler System:153MBhWood Boiler Peak Heat into waterMax Storage Temp:200F Assume 200F is maximum Storage water temperatureMin Storage Temp:150F Assume 150F is minimum useable heating temperatureDelta-T 50 FStorage Capacity:6HrsTime to lower Storage Capacity (gals) by50FQty of wood Req'd:0.09 cordsQty Wood to raise Storage Capacity by50F 153 outputStorage Capacity Req'd:2198GalsAt 153MBh for6hrsTotal Btu's Stored:917MBh NOTE: About .15 cords will fit into the fire box based on 0.15cords/stokeGross Btu's (Into firebox):2555MBtu fire box volume of 38 cu. ft. and cord volume of 4' x 4' x 8'Wood System Operation Burn Time (hr) 2 HrNumber of Boilers:1GARNsWood Burner Output:958MBh - into waterBoiler InputBoiler OutputAnnual Wood Energy Use: 1,376 MMBtu/year (into Burner)Fuel Oil 33.28$ $/MMBtu$43.23$/MMBtugy,y( )$$$$ Boiler energy input/stoking: 2.6 MMBtu/stoking into burner/GARNWood 10.27$ $/MMBtu $13.70 $/MMBtu # Stokings/year 538 # Stokings/year (total) Months/year8approx. Manhours/stoking: 0.18hrs/stokingPER GARN (not used directly) Manhours/year:242(see stoking labor section below)Present value of costs Cost of labor ($/hr)1.17OH Rate (Not used) 20-year10-year5-yearCost of labor ($/hr)$0.00Sunken CostOil Heat$1,409,948$540,947$238,570 Cost of labor ($/hr)$0.00Sunken CostOil Heat$1,409,948$540,947$238,570 Cost/yr contract worker $0Wood System $510,391 $216,673 $100,393 Electric Blower Energy:0.75HP /GARN Wood Costs/Oil Costs 36% 40% 42%Page 1 of 311/9/2008 COFFMAN COVE SCHOOLWOOD HEAT ANALYSIS USING 8% ANNUAL FUEL COST ESCALATION Fan Runtime:2.5hrs/firing assume 30 minutes longer than wood takes to burnEnergy Consumption:1.4kWh/firing/GARN Energy Consumption:1.4kWh/firing/GARN Cost of Electricity:$0.670per kWhOil Heat Wood HeatLabor Wood O& M Fuel Oil Fuel Oil O&M$4.46/gal $175/cord Fan Energy Cost: $505Total all units Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost N/ACost/Yr Cost/YrWood Sys Maintenance Year($2008)($2008)($2008)($2008)($2008)($2008)($2008)($2008)($2008) Fire brick cost$3002008 $0 $12,012 $805 $6,690 $44,600 $0 $44,600 $19,508 $25,092Total O&M Cost: $8052009 $0 $12,613 $838 $7,225 $48,168 $0 $48,168 $20,676 $27,4922010$0$13 244$871$7 803$52 021$0$52 021$21 918$30 103Wood Heat System Oil Heat SystemAnnual Savings using Wood Heat2010$0$13,244$871$7,803$52,021$0$52,021$21,918$30,103Wood Equipment Cost$02011 $0 $13,906 $906 $8,427 $56,183 $0 $56,183 $23,239 $32,944Heat Load met by GARN85%2012 $0 $14,601 $942 $9,102 $60,678 $0 $60,678 $24,645 $36,0332013 $0 $15,331 $980 $9,830 $65,532 $0 $65,532 $26,141 $39,391Oil system O&M cost /yr*$02014 $0 $16,098 $1,019 $10,616 $70,775 $0 $70,775 $27,733 $43,042* Note: Sunk cost, not included in comparison 2015 $0 $16,903 $1,060 $11,465 $76,437 $0 $76,437 $29,428 $47,009Real Interest rate:3.00%2016 $0 $17,748 $1,102 $12,383 $82,551 $0 $82,551 $31,233 $51,3192017$0$18 635$1 146$13 373$89 156$0$89 156$33 155$56 0012017$0$18,635$1,146$13,373$89,156$0$89,156$33,155$56,001Real Fuel Oil Price Increase:8.00%2018 $0 $19,567 $1,192 $14,443 $96,288 $0 $96,288 $35,202 $61,086Real Wood Price Increase:5.00%2019 $0 $20,545 $1,240 $15,599 $103,991 $0 $103,991 $37,384 $66,607Rate of Inflation:4.00%2020 $0 $21,573 $1,289 $16,847 $112,310 $0 $112,310 $39,708 $72,6022021 $0 $22,651 $1,341 $18,194 $121,295 $0 $121,295 $42,186 $79,1092022 $0 $23,784 $1,395 $19,650 $130,999 $0 $130,999 $44,828 $86,1712023 $0 $24,973 $1,450 $21,222 $141,479 $0 $141,479 $47,645 $93,834$$$$$$$$$2024$0$26,222$1,508$22,920$152,797$0$152,797$50,650$102,1482025 $0 $27,533 $1,569 $24,753 $165,021 $0 $165,021 $53,855 $111,1662026 $0 $28,909 $1,632 $26,733 $178,222 $0 $178,222 $57,274 $120,9482027 $0 $30,355 $1,697 $28,872 $192,480 $0 $192,480 $60,924 $131,557GIVEN: $2,008 $399,209 $25,990 $308,156$2,042,992 $2,042,992$729,339 $1,315,661Number of Boilers: 1 EAGARN Model No.: 3200 3,200 Gallons total boiler volumeMax Boiler Temp 200 FMin Boiler Temp 150 FBuilding Heat Required (MBh) 153MBh - into waterGross Wood Btu's/Stoking (MBtu):2,555 MBtu - Gross wood energyGross Wood Btu's/hr (MBH):1,278 MBh - GrossTime to burn out one Stoking (Hr): 2.0 Hr - burn time check, compare to cell B33Net Wood Burner ouput/hr (MBH):958.3 MBh - into waterPeak+200M btu/hrPeak + 100 M btu/hrPeak btu/hrPeak-100 M btu/hrPeak-200M btu/hrNET Boiler Output (MBh)455 355 255 155 55BOILER FIRING INTERVAL Time to Heat (Hr)2.6 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5Stokings Req'd (Firings)1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7Time to Cool (Hr)2.9 3.8 5.2 8.6 24.4Ti t H t C l (H )56607110 325 9Time to Heat + Cool (Hr)5.66.07.110.325.9Avg Stoking Interval (Hr)4.2 5.4 7.5 12.4 35.1Page 2 of 311/9/2008 COFFMAN COVE SCHOOLWOOD HEAT ANALYSIS USING 8% ANNUAL FUEL COST ESCALATIONSTOKING LABORHeating season8mo x 4 33 wk/mo=34 6weeksHeating season8mo x 4.33 wk/mo 34.6weeksWeekday stoking labor 1 hr/d x 5 d/wk x 34.6 wk =173.0 hr/heating seasonSaturday stoking labor 1 hr/d x 1 d/wk x 34.6 wk =34.6 hr/heating seasonSunday stoking labor 1 hr/d x 1 d/wk x 34.6 wk =34.6hr/heating seasonTotal Stoking Labor Time 242.2 hr/heating seasonASSUMPTIONS4. Firing rates are based upon using 1 each Garn 3200 boiler (3200 gal water capacity).7. Wood fuel cost is expected to rise at a lower rate than that of fuel oil. In this case, it has been fixed at 1% above the rate of inflation, or 3.5% per annum in this analysis.5. Firewood is assumed to be all local hemlock, dried to 30% moisture content.6. Firewood is assumed to be 100 cu ft per cord, which includes cordwood bark.3. Labor rate is based upon an estimated rate of $20/hour, with 1 hr/day stoking on weekdays, 1 hr/day on Saturdays, and 1 hr/day on Sundays.2. Wood price estimate is from discussions with local consumers. Going rate is conservatively estimated at $175/cord from wood sources in USFS and private land holdings.1. Fuel oil cost is based upon October 2008 price of #2 heating oil from local fuel oil supplier.NOTES1. Labor time can be significantly reduced by use of equipment, such as a skid steer loader to help position pallets or skids of firewood for stoking.p,,py8. Wood fuel is assumed to replace 85% of the oil consumption at the facility.2. There should be a year's worth of wood on hand to ensure the 30% moisture content. The moisture content of wood fuel up to 40% can drive up the equivalent cost of wood significantly.$200 000$250,000 Oil Heat vs. Wood Heat Annual Costs ($2008 dollars)Oil Heat $4.46/gal$100,000 $150,000 $200,000 Wood Heat $175/cord$0 $50,000 Page 3 of 311/9/2008     ATTACHMENT NO. 2 IDTask NameDurationStartFinish1Phase I - Reconnaissance Complete0 daysFri 10/31/08Fri 10/31/082Complete & submit AEA grant application0 daysMon 11/10/08Mon 11/10/083Grant Award and NTP0 daysWed 7/1/09Wed 7/1/094Phase II - Resource Assessment /Conceptual Design (35%)34 daysWed 7/1/09Tue 8/18/095Perform resource assessment / site visit14 daysWed 7/1/09Tue 7/21/096Develop Concept (35%) Design10 daysWed 7/22/09Tue 8/4/097SISD / Agency review and comment10 daysWed 8/5/09Tue 8/18/098Phase III - Final Design70 daysWed 8/19/09Wed 11/25/099Develop Final Design30 daysWed 8/19/09Wed 9/30/0910SISD / Agency review and comment10 daysThu 10/1/09Wed 10/14/0911Permitting30 daysThu 10/15/09Wed 11/25/0912Approval to Construct Issued0 daysWed 11/25/09Wed 11/25/0913Phase IV - Construction Phase177 daysThu 11/26/09Fri 7/30/1014Procurement60 daysThu 11/26/09Wed 2/17/1015Delivery of materials to project site30 daysThu 2/18/10Wed 3/31/1016Construction90 daysThu 4/1/10Thu 6/24/1017Startup-Commissioning7 daysThu 6/24/10Fri 7/2/1018Final Inspection & Acceptance0 daysFri 7/2/10Fri 7/2/1019Project Closeout Activities20 daysMon 7/5/10Fri 7/30/1010/3111/107/18/510/111/257/2Oct '08Nov '08Dec '08Jan '09Feb '09Mar '09Apr '09May '09Jun '09Jul '09Aug '09Sep '09Oct '09Nov '09Dec '09Jan '10Feb '10Mar '10Apr '10May '10Jun '10Jul '10Aug '1020092010TaskProgressMilestoneSummaryCoffman Cove SchoolPreliminary Schedule:Proposed Cordwood Heating SystemThorne Bay, AlaskaPage 1Project: Coffman Cove School Heating SystemDate: Sun 11/9/08     ATTACHMENT NO. 3     ATTACHMENT NO. 4     ATTACHMENT NO. 5     ATTACHMENT NO. 6 Alaska Energy Authority ‐ Renewable Energy FundCoffman Cove SchoolCoffman Cove, AKBUDGET SUMMARY:Milestone or Task Federal Funds State FundsLocal Match Funds (Cash)Local Match Funds (In‐Kind)Other FundsTOTALSReconnaisance‐$                    ‐$                   Engineering to 35% 15,919$             15,919$             Engineering to 100% 31,837$             31,837$             Building construction 242,600$           14,000$             256,600$           Piping 15,000$             15,000$             Construction Management 35,700$             35,700$             TOTALS 341,056$          14,000$             355,056$          Milestone # or Phase #BUDGET CATAGORIES:1234TOTALSDirect Labor and Benefits $124,400 $0Travel, Meals, or Per Diem$0Equipment$147,200 $0Supplies$0Contractual Services $0 $15,919 $31,837 $35,700 $370,471Construction Services$0Other Direct Costs$4,000TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES $0 $15,919 $31,837 $307,300 $355,056RFA AEA09‐004 Budget Form     ATTACHMENT NO. 7     ATTACHMENT NO. 8  Renewable Energy Fund   RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet Page 1 Application Cost Worksheet Please note that some fields might not be applicable for all technologies or all project phases. Level of information detail varies according to phase requirements. 1. Renewable Energy Source The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis. Annual average resource availability. Forestry assessments show at least 5,000 cords of  firewood available in the area.  This would  accommodate at least 61 years of harvest with SISD  demand, and this does not include sawmill waste.   Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomasss fuel) 2. Existing Energy Generation a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Number of generators/boilers/other 3 oil fired boilers in the school ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 266,000 BTU/hr ea, or 798,000 BTU/hr for all three boilers. iii. Generator/boilers/other type These boilers are located in the Coffman Cove School mechanical room iv. Age of generators/boilers/other Boileea 1 + yrs v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other Boiler estimated @ 77 to 80% b) Annual O&M cost i. Annual O&M cost for labor 0, sunken cost, part of regular duties of O&M staff ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor $7,000 c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Electricity [kWh] NA ii. Fuel usage (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank Diesel [gal] Other iii. Peak Load iv. Average Load v. Minimum Load vi. Efficiency vii. Future trends d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] 10,000 gallon #2 heating oil @ 134,000 BTU/  Renewable Energy Fund   RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet Page 2 ii. Electricity [kWh] iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] vi. Other   3. Proposed System Design a) Installed capacity The wood-fired hydronic heater would be set up in a separate building, and would consist one Garn® Model 3200 wood-fired hydronic heater, with a total water capacity of 3,200 gallons. This boiler is sized to provide 60% of the peak building load with a six hour interval between firings. The water capacity of the boiler is sized so that it would serve as a thermal storage bank for the facility, and would require intermittent firing. In this configuration, it is anticipated that the wood-fired boiler would meet 85% of the building’s heating needs. b) Annual renewable electricity generation i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] ii. Electricity [kWh] iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] Cordwood will provide 80% to 90% of the heat for the facilities at 60% peak load. At a boiler efficiency of 75%, this translated to 81cords of wood per year, or approximately 118 green tons of cordwood vi. Other 4. Project Cost a) Total capital cost of new system $355,056 b) Development cost $47,756 (engineering, permitting) c) Annual O&M cost of new system $1,000 d) Annual fuel cost $20,865 ($14,175 wood, $6,690 oil) 5. Project Benefits a) Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity ii. Heat 8,500 gal. fuel oil (10,000 x .85) year 1  Renewable Energy Fund   RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet Page 3 iii. Transportation b) Price of displaced fuel $37,910 (8,500 gal. x $4.46 per gal) c) Other economic benefits Local employment and revenue for supplying cordwood d) Amount of Alaska public benefits $37,910, year 1 6. Power Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for power purchase/sale NA 7. Project Analysis a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio 0.39 for 5 yr; 1.05 for 10yr; 1.99 for 15 yr: 3.49 for 20yr Payback $355,056/$22,930/year = 15.5 years See Biomass Analysis spreadsheet in Attachment No. 1 for details of calculations.     ATTACHMENT NO. 9     ATTACHMENT NO. 10     ATTACHMENT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATE FOR WOOD‐FIRED HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM FOR COFFMAN COVE SCHOOLUNIT UNIT COST UNITS EXTENSIONSF 30$                       2,220                    66,600$               SF $                     175                          480  $               84,000 EA 42,000$               1                            42,000$               LS 20,000$               1                            20,000$               LF 50$                       100                       5,000$                  LS 10,000$               1                            10,000$               227,600$             34,140$               34,140$               295,880$             59,176$               355,056$             PROJECT TOTALINTERFACE BETWEEN SCHOOL HYDRONIC SYSTEM AND WOOD‐FIRED HEATING SYSTEMHEATING SYSTEM COST SUBTOTALENGINEERING @ 15%CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT @ 15%SUBTOTALCONTINGENCY @ 20%DESCRIPTIONFUEL STORAGE BUILDING, FABRIC AND FRAMEHEATER BUILDING, PANEL & STEEL FRAME, CONCRETE FLOOR, 16' X 30'WOOD‐FIRED HYDRONIC HEATING UNIT, 3200 GALELECTRICAL, MECHANICALUNDERGROUND INSULATED HEAT PIPING