HomeMy WebLinkAboutUmnak Wind-Diesel and Jacket Heat Recovery App
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 1 of 18 9/2/2008
Application Forms and Instructions
The following forms and instructions are provided for preparing your application for a
Renewable Energy Fund Grant. An electronic version of the Request for Applications (RFA)
and the forms are available online at http://www.akenergyauthority.org/RE_Fund.html
The following application forms are required to be submitted for a grant recommendation:
Grant Application
Form
GrantApp.doc Application form in MS Word that includes an outline of
information required to submit a complete application.
Applicants should use the form to assure all information is
provided and attach additional information as required.
Application Cost
Worksheet
Costworksheet.doc Summary of Cost information that should be addressed
by applicants in preparing their application.
Grant Budget
Form
GrantBudget.xls A detailed grant budget that includes a breakdown of
costs by task and a summary of funds available and
requested to complete the work for which funds are being
requested.
Grant Budget
Form Instructions
GrantBudgetInstr.pdf Instructions for completing the above grant budget form.
• If you are applying for grants for more than one project, provide separate application
forms for each project.
• Multiple phases for the same project may be submitted as one application.
• If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project, provide a plan
and grant budget for completion of each phase.
• If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting
funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the
preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
• If you have additional information or reports you would like the Authority to consider in
reviewing your application, either provide an electronic version of the document with
your submission or reference a web link where it can be downloaded or reviewed.
REMINDER:
• Alaska Energy Authority is subject to the Public Records Act, AS 40.25 and materials
submitted to the Authority may be subject to disclosure requirements under the act if no
statutory exemptions apply.
• All applications received will be posted on the Authority web site after final
recommendations are made to the legislature.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 2 of 18 9/3/2008
SECTION 1 – APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name (Name of utility, IPP, or government entity submitting proposal)
Umnak Power/ Nikolski IRA Council
Type of Entity:
Tribally Owned Electric Utility
Mailing Address
Po Box 105 Nikolski, AK 99638
Physical Address
Nikolski, Umnak Island AK
Telephone
907-576-2220
Fax
907-576-2220
Email
Iko.tribe@hotmail.com
Point of Contact
Name
Everette Anderson
Title
Business Development/Corporate Relations Specialist
Mailing Address
5470 Shilshole Ave. NW, Suite 430
Telephone
206.369.5952
Fax
206.782.1721
Email
eanderson@apicda.com
1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your
application will be rejected.
1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box)
An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS
42.05, or
An independent power producer, or
A local government, or
X A governmental entity (which includes tribal councils and housing authorities);
Y 1.2.2. Attached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by
its board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If a
collaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant’s governing
authority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box )
Y 1.2.3. As an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and
follow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant
agreement.
Y 1.2.4. If awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached
grant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the
application.)
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 3 of 18 9/3/2008
SECTION 2 – PROJECT SUMMARY
Provide a brief 1-2 page overview of your project.
2.1 PROJECT TYPE
Describe the type of project you are proposing, (Reconnaissance; Resource Assessment/
Feasibility Analysis/Conceptual Design; Final Design and Permitting; and/or Construction) as
well as the kind of renewable energy you intend to use. Refer to Section 1.5 of RFA.
This is a construction project with three parts. We will integrate an existing Vestas V15
65 kW wind turbine with an existing diesel powerhouse. To absorb excess power,
remote thermal nodes will be installed and integrated with existing boiler systems at the
Nikolski School and Ugludax Lodge. A waste heat recovery system will be installed in
the diesel plant and connected to the nearby Community Center.
2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Provide a one paragraph description of your project. At a minimum include the project location,
communities to be served, and who will be involved in the grant project.
This medium penetration wind-diesel and jacket heat recovery project is located on
Umnak Island, approximately 100 miles west of Unalaska/Dutch Harbor. The community
of Nikolski will be directly served by this project. In addition, the community of pilots
and passengers who make international flights over this area will benefit greatly. A
communications gap, long a problem for international flights, was recently remedied by
the installation of communications equipment in Nikolski by the FAA.
The Nikolski IRA Council, Chaluka Corporation, the management of Umnak Power, TDX
Power and the Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association/APICDA will
be involved in ensuring this project succeeds.
2.3 PROJECT BUDGET OVERVIEW
Briefly discuss the amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source
of other contributions to the project. Include a project cost summary that includes an estimated total cost
through construction.
The estimated total cost for this construction project is $451,030. The amount of funds
requested from the Renewable Energy Fund for this project is $409,530.
APICDA will provide room and board at the Ugludax Lodge for a crew of 5 for 14 days
and a second crew of two for 7 days, an in-kind donation worth $21,000.
The Alaska Building Science Network has dedicated $10,000 towards the heat recovery
system.
The Nikolski IRA will provide local labor for all tasks and donate fuel for the heavy
equipment, a donation worth $8,500.
The Nikolski Fisherman’s Association will provide the necessary heavy equipment and
an operator for a donation worth $2,000.
2.4 PROJECT BENEFIT
Briefly discuss the financial benefits that will result from this project, including an estimate of economic
benefits(such as reduced fuel costs) and a description of other benefits to the Alaskan public.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 4 of 18 9/3/2008
The community will see immediate fuel savings which will enable the utility to hedge
against rising fuel costs and to conserve their precious fuel supply. Once the wind
turbine has been integrated into the system, preliminary findings indicate that there
could be up to 10,248 gallons of fuel saved at the power plant. This is worth $62,000 at
2008 prices. Through thermal load distribution the Nikolski School and Ugludax Lodge
will receive the added benefit of residual heat displacement, further minimizing the need
for 5,252 gallons of diesel fuel worth $31,775 at 2008 prices. This is a total annual
savings of $93,775 for fuel annually.
Reduced use of the larger diesel at the power plant will save on oil changes and
maintenance costs at the plant. How much is yet to be determined. Much depends on
the power demands of FAA’s newly installed equipment, which has yet to establish a
history of usage.
Completing the wind-diesel project in Nikolski will benefit the community with added
peace of mind that the possibility of another fuel crisis is reduced. And in the event of
another fuel crisis, directing all fuel supplies to the power plant will also provide for three
large community buildings to have heat.
International air traffic will benefit from this project because the FAA communications
equipment requires reliable power. The wind-diesel system proposed by TDX Power will
be more sustainable than the current diesel only system.
2.5 PROJECT COST AND BENEFIT SUMARY
Include a summary of your project’s total costs and benefits below.
2.5.1 Total Project Cost
(Including estimates through construction.)
$ 451,030
2.5.2 Grant Funds Requested in this application. $ 409,430
2.5.3 Other Funds to be provided (Project match) $ 41,600
2.5.4 Total Grant Costs (sum of 2.5.2 and 2.5.3) $ 451,030
2.5.5 Estimated Benefit (Savings) $ 94,000 annually
2.5.6 Public Benefit (If you can calculate the benefit in terms of
dollars please provide that number here and explain how
you calculated that number in your application.)
$ 94,000 fuel saved
benefits entire community
SECTION 3 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Describe who will be responsible for managing the project and provide a plan for successfully completing the
project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the application.
3.1 Project Manager
Tell us who will be managing the project for the Grantee and include a resume and references for the
manager(s). If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project
management Support. If the applicant expects project management assistance from AEA or another government
entity, state that in this section.
John Lyons, Operations Manager for TDX Power, will be the Project Manager.
John’s Resume is attached to this application.
3.2 Project Schedule
Include a schedule for the proposed work that will be funded by this grant. (You may include a chart or table
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 5 of 18 9/3/2008
attachment with a summary of dates below.)
Late January – early February 2009 Indoor work (Tasks 1 - 3 listed below)
May 2009 Outdoor work (Task 4 listed below)
While it would be more cost effective to do all the planned work in one site visit, it will not be possible to
do the trenching to hardwire the thermal nodes in the winter with frozen ground. It is possible, however,
to utilize the wind turbine without the thermal nodes being connected. The controls can be programmed
with a maximum kW production output set point which will then apply the turbine brakes when that
output is exceeded.
Although doing the project in two phases is not the preferred option, the need to displace diesel is so
great in this location that the added cost for two trips out is warranted by the savings in diesel from
adding wind energy to the generating mix as soon as possible. The second trip out also provides an
opportunity for John Lyons to do a follow up inspection of the turbine after it has been running for 3
months.
TASK J F M A M
1. Waste Heat Recovery System
a. Install jacket heat recovery system in powerplant x x
b. Install baseboard heat plumbing in Community Center x x
c. Connect heat recovery system to Community Center x x
2. Wind Turbine Integration
a. Add and modify control switchgear in diesel plant x x
b. Add communications link to wind turbine x x
c. Add communications link to school x x
d. Add communications link to lodge x x
3. Thermal Node Installation
a. Install thermal node at school x x
b. Install thermal node at Lodge x x
4. Hardwire thermal nodes
a. Dig trench and hardwire school to power plant x
b. Dig trench and hardwire lodge to either power plant or
wind turbine transformer
x
3.4 Project Resources
Describe the personnel, contractors, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the project. Include any
partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project.
Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or
contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known, key personnel, contractors, and suppliers as an
attachment to your application.
TDX Power, in concert with the Native Village of Nikolski and APICDA’s management team will use its
own personnel to manage and implement virtually every aspect of the proposed Nikolski project scope.
TDX Powers’ management team has a long record of power industry accomplishment in Alaska, the
lower 48 and internationally.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 6 of 18 9/3/2008
Nick Goodman, CEO, manages TDX Power, its subsidiaries and its operations on a daily basis. With 10
years experience in wind, hydro and fossil generation development and facilities management, Goodman
is a well known participant in the Alaska power markets and a featured energy conference speaker. He is
TDX Power’s primary representative in its associations with the Company’s customers, suppliers, banks,
auditors, regulatory agencies and energy institutions such as the US Department Of Energy (USDOE),
the Alaska Industrial Export and Development Authority (AIDEA), AEA, the Alaska Rural Electric
Cooperative Association (ARECA) and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC).
The Company’s chief operations officer, John Lyons, served 20 years as the Alaska Village Electric
Cooperative’s operations manager prior to joining TDX. He has designed, built and managed the
operations of over 100 energy plants in remote Alaska. As well as the primary operations manager of
TDX Power’s regulated electric utilities, Lyons is directly responsible for the operations and high
availability record of the Saint Paul wind/diesel facility. He will play a very key and hands on role in the
implementation of the wind project at St. George.
TDX Power’s chief design engineer, William Scott, provides the detailed engineering and modeling
associated with all of the Company’s utilities, projects and consulting contracts. He is a Registered
Professional Engineer with 35 years experience in power generation, and an acknowledged authority in
renewable as well as fossil fueled reciprocating and rotating prime mover technology and
thermodynamic cycles.
Controlled Power designed the existing controls in the Nikolski Diesel Plant. The firm is well known to
the AEA and designs the controls for many, if not all, AEA led power plant upgrades in rural Alaska.
John Lyons has already spent many hours working with Mike Dizard from Controlled Power to design the
modifications to the diesel controls and the additional controls needed to integrate wind energy.
Controlled Power will do the modifications and construct the new panel for wind controls at their
Washington offices and will do the on-site programming required to get the project up and running.
Connie Fredenberg is Special Projects Manager for TDX Power and APICDA’s Winter Caretaker for
Ugludax Lodge. Connie came to this project directly from her former position at the Aleutian Pribilof
Islands Association, where she spearheaded the beginnings of this project. During her time at the Lodge
this winter Connie will be available to assist TDX Power and Umnak Power with project oversight.
Connie also volunteers at Umnak Power with utility management while staying at the Lodge.
3.5 Project Communications
Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status.
TDX Power and APICDA will be monitoring the project closely with the community. TDX Power is already
under contract with Umnak Power to provide oversight for the existing diesel plant. The Nikolski power
plant operator has an established weekly call schedule with John Lyons. The plant logs are faxed to
John Lyons weekly prior to the scheduled call. This has proven a very satisfactory and beneficial
practice and will be continued with the addition of the wind turbine, thermal nodes, and waste heat
recovery system. APICDA maintains a close relationship with the community on many levels and has a
vested interest in monitoring the progress and sustainability of this project.
TDX Power will provide regular detailed reports to the AEA on the progress of this construction project
with assistance from the Ugludax Lodge’s winter caretaker, who also works for TDX Power.
3.6 Project Risk
Discuss potential problems and how you would address them.
The number one problem this project will face is the infamous Aleutian weather. Weather rules in
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 7 of 18 9/3/2008
Nikolski. It controls what gets on or off the island and when. Severe weather controls when work can or
cannot take place. TDX Power’s roots are in the Aleutian Islands, though, and the company has learned
to adapt. Shipments of materials will be sent well in advance of the work crew. On island personnel will
inventory and report when all materials have arrived. Then, and only then, will the crew mobilize for
travel to the site. We have included a contingency fund in our budget to cover travel delays. It is best to
count on travel delays and then be pleasantly surprised when they don’t happen, rather than caught off-
guard and unprepared when they do.
Local equipment failure is always a problem in remote isolated locations because there is no opportunity
to acquire parts for repairs in a timely manner. This project requires a minimal, but critical, amount of
trenching. At this time there is a piece of equipment on island that can accomplish this task which is in
good working order. Prior to mobilizing the crew to do the work in Phase II we will contact personnel on
island to ascertain what, if any, spare parts might be best to have in hand upon arrival.
SECTION 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND TASKS
• Tell us what the project is and how you will meet the requirements outlined in Section 2 of
the RFA. The level of information will vary according to phase of the project you propose to
undertake with grant funds.
• If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project provide a plan and
grant budget for completion of each phase.
• If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for
an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases
are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted.
4.1 Proposed Energy Resource
Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available.
Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be
available for the market to be served by your project.
This is a Phase IV Construction project designed to exploit a Class 7 wind resource for
electric and heating purposes and to take advantage of the jacket heat from a diesel plant
15 feet from the Community Center.
Making use of jacket water heat should be a requirement on every new power plant. To
waste heat is a crime in this day and age. Retrofitting this diesel plant to include a waste
heat recovery system and benefit a building only 15 feet away is a most sensible thing to
do.
A Wind Resource Report was completed by Doug Vaught for the AEA on data collected
from 12/11/05 through 3/13/07. To quote the report, “Nikolski has superb potential for
wind power development with Class 7 wind power density, moderate wind shear, bi-
directional winds and low turbulence.”
The entire village was involved in studying their wind resource. Students from grades 1-
12 monitored the site and studied KidWind curriculum. Elders watched out their kitchen
windows with purpose to note avian activity around the met tower. The community is
100% behind developing their most abundant natural resource and reducing their
dependence on imported fuel.
There are other renewable energy resources available to Nikolski. Multiple significant
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 8 of 18 9/3/2008
geothermal resources are found on Umnak Island, but they are inconveniently located
and would be far too expensive to develop for the current small local needs. There is a
stream that never freezes flowing right through the village. But this is a productive
salmon stream and the local population is unwilling to risk this close supply of fish to
develop even a small hydropower project.
Nikolski has a relatively new tank farm with adequate storage for diesel and gas, but
getting liquid fossil fuels to this location is expensive, logistically challenging, and
sometimes nearly impossible.
Displacing as much of the imported fuel now used for making electricity and heat is the
number one energy priority for Nikolski.
4.2 Existing Energy System
4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System
Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about
the number, size, age, efficiency, and type of generation.
The existing power plant was commissioned by the AEA in May of 2006. There are two
John Deere diesel gen-sets in operation at this time: one 71 kW and one 37 kW. The
alternator on the 37 kW gen-set was increased in frame size and rating to 50 kW in
November 2007 to replace a failed alternator. The diesel plant’s generation efficiency
meets the PCE required 10 kWh/gal. sold each month. There are currently no provisions
for waste heat recovery at this plant.
In July of 2007 TDX Power, with funds from a USDA/RUS grant and the Aleutian Pribilof
Islands Community Development Association, installed a Vestas V15 65 kW wind turbine.
This is a used turbine that was refurbished by Halus, a well known turbine re-
manufacturer located in San Francisco, CA. The turbine is wired up to the diesel plant,
but not connected. The controls in the diesel plant require modification in order to
integrate the energy from the wind turbine.
4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used
Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of
any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources.
Currently Nikolski uses diesel fuel for both electric generation and heat. Most homes,
businesses, and community facilities have boilers and baseboard heat. Four homes and
the Lodge have working woodstoves that can utilize a significant driftwood resource.
The integration of the wind turbine with the diesel plant, even in a low to medium
penetration configuration, will displace significant amounts of diesel. In 2007 the power
plant generated 290,599 kWh’s and used 25,548 gallons of fuel. According to the Wind
Resource Report, even at a conservative estimate of 89% availability the Vestas V15 could
produce 236,380 kWh/yr. and potentially displace 19,698 gallons of fuel at the power plant.
Bill Scott, using software he developed, has a more conservative estimate for diesel
displaced at the power plant but includes diesel displaced for heat. He estimates an
annual savings of 10,248 gallons at the plant and 5,252 gallons displaced for diesel heat
at the Nikolski School and Ugludax Lodge.
The overall reduction in diesel fuel use will provide a cushion of time when fuel deliveries
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 9 of 18 9/3/2008
are delayed - either by weather or by the business decisions of fuel delivery services.
Prolonging the time between required fuel deliveries by integrating wind energy into the
generation mix will reduce the potential for disruptions in service for power, heat, and the
communications equipment that rely on these services.
4.2.3 Existing Energy Market
Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy
customers.
Nikolski has experienced an energy crisis caused by delayed fuel deliveries in both of the
past two winters. This community understands the dangers of relying on an imported
fuel. Last winter was particularly difficult. The fuel tanks were nearly dry many times
awaiting the next ten barrels to come by plane or fishing boat before the fuel barge finally
arrived in June.
Residential customers in Nikolski are skillful at conserving electricity. Pre-pay meters,
the ultimate conservation educational tool, were installed by Umnak Power in March of
2007. Residential customers rarely pass the 500 kWh usage subsidized by PCE.
Commercial customers are conservative because of the high cost of energy with no PCE
subsidy available to them. During the winter of 07/08 the community worked well together
to keep the village load below 25kW so the power plant could stay on the smallest
generator and conserve the most fuel. Laundry and cooking was staggered so as not to
use too much power at any one time.
The school and the lodge are the two biggest electric consumers for Umnak Power. And
they are the biggest consumers of diesel for heat. Supplementing the power and heat for
these two customers will greatly reduce the fuel requirements for the community.
Retrofitting the diesel plant to divert waste heat to the Community Center is a perfect
match. This is a large facility that could provide a warm shelter for the entire community
if a fuel crisis once again forces residents to choose between diesel for electricity or heat.
The FAA completed a new communications equipment installation in early July of this
year. This equipment fills a void in communications for international air traffic between
Asia and North America. This equipment requires significant reliable power. The
installation was approved at this location by FAA under the assumption that the wind-
diesel system proposed by Umnak Power and TDX Power would supply their needs. A
letter included with this application from FAA states their needs and expectations.
Completing the final phase of the Nikolski Wind-Diesel Project will benefit the residents
and businesses of Nikolski by providing a stable supplemental source of fuel for power.
Displacing diesel on all fronts is the goal of this project.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 10 of 18 9/3/2008
4.3 Proposed System
Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address
potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues.
4.3.1 System Design
Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system:
• A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location
• Optimum installed capacity
• Anticipated capacity factor
• Anticipated annual generation
• Anticipated barriers
• Basic integration concept
• Delivery methods
The proposed project will integrate the existing Vestas V15 65 kW wind turbine with the
existing Nikolski power plant in what is considered a low to medium penetration scheme.
A diesel generator is required to be on-line at all times. Although TDX Power considers
high penetration the preferred integration mode for wind energy, such complex
technology is not recommended for this remote location.
The Wind Resource Report estimates a 40.4% capacity factor for a V15 in this wind
regime. Bill Scott estimates the wind turbine will produce 262,000kWh/year, near the high
end of predictions by Doug Vaught in the Wind Resource Report.
In the proposed integration scheme, the PLC control network will extend from the
powerhouse switchgear to the wind turbine over the Ethernet radio link. The radio
frequency Ethernet link was installed during the turbine construction period. The existing
computer server will be used to connect to the wind turbine controller for monitoring and
troubleshooting using the software supplied by Halus. The start stop controls signals will
be via the PLC discrete I/O over the Ethernet link
A PLC node will be added at the wind turbine consisting of a micro PLC with processor
and I/O to start, and stop the wind turbine, and monitor the on-line status. This extension
will include an enclosure, the PLC, five port Ethernet switch, power supply, and control
power transformer. The enclosure will be mounted next to the existing wind turbine
controller enclosure.
All power and energy produced and consumed by the wind turbine, and load banks used
for control, will be monitored at the diesel generator switchgear, and will be displayed at
the switchgear HMI panel. The HMI panel will require a degree of programming to set-up a
new GUI for the turbine operator interface.
The wind turbine controller data will be available locally and remotely over the same
Ethernet link using the computer server located at the diesel generator switchgear
running the software provided by Halus Power Systems. The Wind turbine controller data
will not be available to the PLC network for display at the switchgear HMI. To integrate the
WTG controller into the existing PLC network would require development of a
communications protocol driver to populate the OPC data base in the local server, and
send the data to the PLC network. When the need arises to move to a high penetration
scheme further development in the communications and control protocols will be
required.
The Halus wind turbine controller replaces the older Vestas V15 controller and includes
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 11 of 18 9/3/2008
power factor correction capacitors that are staged in two steps of 20kVar each when the
turbine is put on line. User definable control of the capacitors includes delay time in
seconds for connecting the capacitors after the generator has been disconnected (to
allow for discharging of capacitors). Voltage stability should not be a problem using the
37kW diesel generator as the lead machine. If power factor correction becomes a
problem at low wind turbine loads, we could use the local WTG PLC to do more
sophisticated control of the correction capacitors other than time delay staging. The
diesel generator power factor to a degree could be highly variable, but the generator will
be lightly loaded, so heating of the generator should not be a problem. Note: The
generator alternator on the smaller rated genset was increased in frame size and rating to
50kw in November 2007 to replace a failed alternator.
Options for controlling and limiting turbine output. Controlling and limiting turbine output
can be accomplished via existing Vestas braking system and the dispatch of thermal
nodes. Turbine output can be regulated a couple of ways. Setting a max kW production
output set point and applying the turbine brakes or by establishing remote thermal nodes
to absorb energy. Limiting turbine output by applying the Vestas braking system is the
simplest in terms of application and costs but could be a concern because of the cycling
in the braking system and the dependence of relying on repetitive braking actions for the
long term control. If the braking system should fail, a shutdown would be uncontrolled
relying on the secondary means of shut down via the turbine blade tip-brakes which
deploy at over speed. This method is not recommended as a normal means of control.
The application of thermal receptors to absorb the excess wind turbine generated energy
while more costly has the advantage of allowing the turbine to operate through its full
rated output. Establishing discrete thermal nodes at selected locations such as the lodge
and/or the school. A secondary advantage of the thermal nodes could be considered for a
fuel use off-set at those locations. This is the preferred method.
Thermal receptors (Load Banks) are proposed to be integrated into the existing school
boiler system and the lodge boiler system or some combination depending on available
funding. Each thermal node will be controlled from the power plant PLC dispatching
excess wind energy with the first priority to dispatch energy to meet the community
electric demand.
Proposed Generator Switchgear Additions:
Add a turbine control section to the end of the existing generator control switchgear. The
new section will be bolted to the end of the switchgear, and bussed to the switchgear bus.
The section will include:
1. Three molded case circuit breakers rated 150 Amp, 480 vac, 3 phase. Auxiliary
contacts and 24VDC shunt trip. Note: Node 2 is intended to be remote from the
buss but includes a local feeder connect/disconnect for future thermal feed if
required.
Wind turbine feeder.
Load bank feeder (Node 1).
Load bank feeder (Node 2).
2. Current transformers, nine, rated 100:5 amp, instrument grade.
3. Three electronic power meters with analog outputs and data communications.
4. Communications equipment for communications link to the wind turbine.
5. PLC input / output node connected to the existing PLC. Analog inputs for power
monitoring, and analog outputs for control of the load bank. Discrete inputs for
breaker status and outputs for breaker control.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 12 of 18 9/3/2008
Communications addition.
Communications link to the wind turbine:
1. Ethernet link via radio modem using 2400 -2483.5 MHz. 1 Watt RF
output. Unlicensed, spread spectrum.
2. Fixed base directional antennas range 5 miles, line of sight.
3. Ethernet switch at the wind turbine.
Communications link to the lodge:
1. Ethernet link via radio modem using 2400 -2483.5 MHz. 1 Watt RF
output. Unlicensed, spread spectrum.
2. Fixed base directional antennas range 5 miles, line of sight.
3. Ethernet switch at the lodge thermal node.
Load bank addition. Thermal Node 1- School and Thermal Node 2 – Lodge.
Integration of Node #1.
1. Self contained Simplex, water cooled load bank rated 64 kW,
at 480, 3 phases.
2. Five load steps, four rated 10kW each, contactor controlled.
One step rated 24kW SCR controlled.
3. Integral control based on 4-20mA signal input.
4. Input water flow switch.
5. Output water temperature transmitter.
6. Local power disconnects.
7. Control power derived from the primary side of the
disconnect.
8. Status and control conductors to be hard wired between
load bank Thermal Node #1 – School and power plant buss.
9. Plumbed with isolation to existing heating/boiler system.
Integration of Node #2.
1. Self contained Simplex, water cooled load bank rated 37 kW,
at 240, single phase.
2. Three load steps, two rated 10kW each, contactor
controlled. One step rated at 17kW SCR controlled.
3. Integral control based on 4-20mA signal input.
4. Input water flow switch.
5. Output water temperature transmitter.
6. Remote power disconnects and user circuit breaker
disconnect.
7. Control power derived from the primary side of the
disconnect.
8. Electrical connection options include: Upgrade the existing
single phase transformer located adjacent to the lodge or
add a second 37 kva pad mount transformer to feed the
thermal receptor. The KWH thermal will be recorded by a
separately installed Form 2S meter. The second option is a
tie-in from the 75 kva three phase 480 volt wind turbine
transformer. This approach would require adding
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 13 of 18 9/3/2008
disconnects and conductor between the turbine and the
lodge, and a step-down 480/240 vac transformer at the
lodge.
9. Remote controlled contactor and communications equipment for
communications link to the lodge thermal receptor from the
power plant including PLC input / output node connected
remotely to the existing PLC. Analog inputs for power
monitoring, and analog outputs for control of the load bank.
10. Plumbed with isolation to existing heating/boiler system.
Wind turbine interface.
1. Communication via established radio frequency modem.
2. PLC I/O node for start / stop control and status inputs for on-line and alarm.
3. Ethernet switch.
4.3.2 Land Ownership
Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the
project or how you intend to approach land ownership and access issues.
There are no existing land ownership issues and access to the project has been secured.
4.3.3 Permits
Provide the following informationas it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address
outstanding permit issues.
• List of applicable permits
• Anticipated permitting timeline
• Identify and discussion of potential barriers
The following agencies have been contacted and have given their approval regarding this
project:
FAA
SHPO
Department of Defense
USFWS
Chaluka Corporation
A Finding of No Significant Impact has been issued. Documentation regarding this
finding is included with this application.
4.3.4 Environmental
Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will
be addressed:
• Threatened or Endangered species
• Habitat issues
• Wetlands and other protected areas
• Archaeological and historical resources
• Land development constraints
• Telecommunications interference
• Aviation considerations
• Visual, aesthetics impacts
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 14 of 18 9/3/2008
• Identify and discuss other potential barriers
There are no existing environmental issues associated with this project.
4.4 Proposed New System Costs (Total Estimated Costs and proposed Revenues)
The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and
any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the
source of their cost data. For example: Applicants Records or Analysis, Industry Standards,
Consultant or Manufacturer’s estimates.
4.4.1 Project Development Cost
Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of
the project. Cost information should include the following:
• Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase
• Requested grant funding
• Applicant matching funds – loans, capital contributions, in-kind
• Identification of other funding sources
• Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system
• Projected development cost of proposed renewable energy system
The total cost of this medium penetration wind-diesel system with thermal nodes at the
school and Ugludax Lodge and a waste heat recovery system to the Community Center
will come to $1,159,505.
This final phase of the project will cost $451,030. This application for $409,530 is to
complete the integration of the wind turbine, install the thermal nodes, and install the
waste heat recovery system from the diesel plant to the community center. The
remainder of the cost for this phase of the project will be covered by a $21,000 in-kind
donation of room and board for the work crew, a $2,000 in-kind donation of trenching
equipment and an operator, and a $7,800 in-kind donation of labor for construction and
$700 fuel donation from the Nikolski IRA. Alaska Building Science Network has dedicated
$10,000 towards the waste heat recovery system.
For this phase the capital costs are expected to be $273,015 and development costs will
be $178,015.
To date the project has included funding from USDA/RUS of $474,475 and the Aleutian
Pribilof Island Community Development Association of $134,000. These funds reflect the
construction of a road to the site, design of a tilt-up tower, refurbishing and shipping the
wind turbine, installing the wind turbine, running the cable from the turbine to the power
plant, and a study of the necessary modifications to the existing diesel plant controls for
integrating the wind energy and controlling the excess electricity to thermal nodes.
Capital costs for the entire project are estimated at $486,750 and development costs at
$672,755.
4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs
Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by
the applicant.
• Total anticipated project cost for this phase
• Requested grant funding
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 15 of 18 9/3/2008
The first year of operations is expected to cost an additional $6,000 for O&M at Umnak
Power because of the cost for an inventory of spare parts. Umnak Power already has an
O&M oversight agreement with TDX Power. Little change is anticipated in the cost of this
monthly oversight and the Nikolski IRA is prepared to cover these costs.
For years 2 through 4 an additional $3,500 will be budgeted for O&M. The sale of green
tags is anticipated to bring in at least $1,000 annually at the current price. This, in
addition to anticipated fuel savings will more than adequately cover the added O&M
costs.
There are no costs associated with O&M requested with this application for funding.
Umnak Power is prepared to be responsible for all O&M costs.
4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale
The power purchase/sale information should include the following:
• Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s)
• Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range
• Proposed rate of return from grant-funded project
Umnak Power will add the wind energy from this project to diesel generated power for
sale to the residents, community facilities, businesses, and federal facilities in Nikolski.
Initially the current rate of $.55/kWh for residential customers and $.75/kWh for all other
rate classes will remain in effect. Generating costs and the electric rates will be adjusted
as necessary once some historical data is collected.
4.4.4 Cost Worksheet
Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered
in evaluating the project.
Download the form, complete it, and submit it as an attachment. Document any
conditions or sources your numbers are based on here.
4.4.5 Business Plan
Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a
minimum proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered.
Umnak Power is operated by the Nikolski IRA Council. The Council is well served by CFO
Growth Solutions where the same bookkeeper has handled their accounts for the past 5
years. The utility is compliant with all RCA reporting requirements and receives PCE.
In March of 2007 Umnak Electric installed pre-pay electric meters to ensure collections
and to encourage energy conservation amongst their residential customers. The local
utility clerk is competent and understands the system. There have been only minor
problems which were quickly remedied.
The lead power plant operator and the assistant operator both successfully completed a 5
day O&M training program at the Vestas O&M Center in Portland, OR in May of 2007.
John Lyons is prepared to provide tower climbing safety training once the wind turbine is
up and running. Funding is already set aside for this training.
Umnak Power has a signed maintenance oversight agreement with TDX Power which will
be amended to include the wind turbine and related thermal loads. The arrangement with
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 16 of 18 9/3/2008
TDX Power includes faxing plant logs to John Lyons weekly, followed by a teleconference
between John and the plant operator. The regular contact has proven very beneficial to
the Nikolski plant. Parts and supplies are inventoried, accounted for, and ordered in a
timely manner. Routine maintenance is done and documented. Plant logs are kept in a
notebook in the tribal office. John Lyons makes site visits twice a year for personal
inspections of the facility and to make any repairs necessary alongside the plant
operator, providing a meaningful training opportunity.
4.4.6 Analysis and Recommendations
Provide information about the economic analysis and the proposed project. Discuss your
recommendation for additional project development work.
The economic analysis was performed using information in the Wind Resource Report.
Bill Scott has developed his own software, “Down East” which was used to calculate the
fuel savings from waste heat recovery and the thermal nodes. His software calculated a
more conservative estimate for the number of gallons displaced and his numbers were
used in this proposal. Even with his lower estimated savings, the result is significant.
Once the system is operational, it will be just as critical to investigate what home owners
and businesses can install in their respective building structures to continue to reduce
the cost of energy. For instance, further integration of electric powered home heating
devices in line with existing diesel fuel fired furnaces may further reduce the need for
diesel fuel but more importantly utilize the lower cost electricity produced by the wind
turbine.
Umnak Power will need to continue to evaluate homes and businesses and identify
additional creative energy efficiency solutions such as in-floor heating systems, and hot
water heating system via the wind turbine. Furthermore, like many communities, Nikolski
should continue to employ weatherization and conservation techniques in order to reduce
energy consumption.
SECTION 5– PROJECT BENEFIT
Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings,
and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project.
The benefits information should include the following:
• Potential annual fuel displacement (gal and $) over the lifetime of the evaluated
renewable energy project
• Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price,
RCA tariff, or avoided cost of ownership)
• Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits)
• Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable
energy subsidies or programs that might be available)
• Discuss the non-economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project
The medium penetration wind-diesel system is predicted to save 10,248 gallons of fuel for
electric production and 5,252 gallons of diesel fuel used for heating at the school and the
Ugludax Lodge. The price for #1 heating fuel delivered by Delta Western in June of 2008
was $4.47/gallon and #2 diesel for the power plant was $4.37/gallon. For the past two
winters emergency fuel has cost up to $10.25/gallon when delivered by ACE cargo or a
fishing boat. At the weighted average cost/gallon of $6.05 the savings is $93,775 annually
and $1,875,500 over the 20 year expected lifetime of the project.
.
Renewable Energy Fund
Grant Application
AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 17 of 18 9/3/2008
Consider the first half of the year in 2008, though. Umnak Power paid $10.25/gallon for
fuel delivered. Saving 7,750 gallons at that price is equal to $79,438. Although not getting
an annual fuel barge delivery is never an option any community wants to consider, it is
becoming a common story in rural Alaska. And it has been Nikolski’s story two winters in
a row. This community is at the front of the line for desperate to get an alternative to
imported fuel.
There are no tax credits available to Umnak Power for this project, but they can sell their
green tags to Denali Green Tags. At the current rate of $4.50/MW Umnak Power’s project
could bring in just over $1,000 annually – at today’s prices. The value of carbon offsets
could go much higher in the near future.
When the fuel barge does not make it to remote communities, deliveries get made in less
than optimal ways. Decreasing the probability that Nikolski will need an emergency
delivery decreases the opportunities for spills from non-traditional deliveries.
SECTION 6 – GRANT BUDGET
Tell us how much your total project costs. Include any investments to date and funding sources,
how much is requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an
applicant.
Include an estimate of budget costs by tasks using the form - GrantBudget.xls
Provide a narrative summary regarding funding sources and your financial commitment
to the project.
The final construction phase for the Nikolski Wind-Diesel Project is $451,030. This
application is for $409,530 to complete the integration of the wind turbine, install the
thermal nodes, and install the waste heat recovery system from the diesel plant to the
community center. The remainder of the cost for this phase of the project will be covered
by a $21,000 in-kind donation of room and board for the work crew, a $2,000 in-kind
donation of trenching equipment and an operator, and a $8,500 in-kind donation of labor
for construction.
The total installed cost of this medium penetration wind-diesel system that includes the
Vestas V15 65 kW wind turbine with thermal nodes at the school and Ugludax Lodge and
a waste heat recovery system to the Community Center will come to$1,159,505.
To date the project has included funding from USDA/RUS of $474,475 and the Aleutian
Pribilof Island Community Development Association of $134,000. This cost reflects the
construction of a road to the site, design of a tilt-up tower, refurbishing and shipping the
wind turbine, installing the wind turbine, running the cable from the turbine to the power
plant, and a study of the necessary modifications to the existing diesel plant controls for
integrating the wind energy and controlling the excess electricity to thermal nodes.
The community, with assistance from APICDA, will have contributed a total of $165,500
towards the cost of the entire project - 23% of the total costs.
SECTION 7 – ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION
Renewable Energy Fund
Application Cost Worksheet
Please note that some fields might not be applicable for all technologies or all project
phases. Level of information detail varies according to phase requirements.
1. Renewable Energy Source
The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a
sustainable basis.
Annual average resource availability. Wind Resource 9.01 m/s (at 30 meters)
Unit depends on project type (e.g. windspeed, hydropower output, biomass fuel)
2. Existing Energy Generation
a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt 1 grid, leave this section blank)
i. Number of generators/boilers/other 2
ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 1 - 37kw, 1-71 kW
iii. Generator/boilers/other type none
iv. Age of generators/boilers/other Commissioned May 2006
v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other At full load, unit 1 burns 3.2 gpm; unit 2 burns
5.8 gpm.
b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Annual O&M cost for labor $12,033
ii. Annual O&M cost for non-labor $ 2,183
c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the
Railbelt grid, leave this section blank)
i. Electricity [kWh] 290,599 kWh
ii. Fuel usage
Diesel [gal] 25,548 gallons
Other
iii. Peak Load 52 kW
iv. Average Load 30 kW
v. Minimum Load 15 kW
vi. Efficiency 11.37 kWh generated/gallon
vii. Future trends Stable, with potential growth up to 1% per year
d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable)
i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] 20,000 gallons estimated
1 The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden
Valley Electric Association, the City of Seward Electric Department, Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage
Municipal Light and Power.
RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet revised 9/26/08 Page 1
Renewable Energy Fund
ii. Electricity [kWh] 0
iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] N/A
iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] N/A
v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] Driftwood and scrap wood as available
vi. Other
3. Proposed System Design
a) Installed capacity 65 kW wind turbine
b) Annual renewable electricity generation
i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu]
ii. Electricity [kWh] 262,000 kwh – Expected average annual wind turbine
production
iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu]
iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu]
v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons]
vi. Other
4. Project Cost
a) Total capital cost of new system $201,250
b) Development cost $249,780
c) Annual O&M cost of new system $6,000 1st year, year 2 - 4 $3,500; year 5 $6,000 -
$7,000
d) Annual fuel cost $94,000 reduction with Integration of Wind
Turbine at 2008 annual average of $6.05/gal.
$159,000 reduction with integration of Wind
Turbine at 2008 late winter emergency fuel
shipment. (An emergency shipment has been
required past two years because scheduled Fall
fuel delivery has not been made.
5. Project Benefits
a) Amount of fuel displaced for
i. Electricity 10,248 gallons
ii. Heat 5,252 gallons
iii. Transportation N/A
RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet revised 9/26/08 Page 2
Renewable Energy Fund
b) Price of displaced fuel $6.05
c) Other economic benefits $1,000 + for green tags
d) Amount of Alaska public benefits $95,000/yr. x 20 = $1,900,000
6. Power Purchase/Sales Price
a) Price for power purchase/sale Current rate is $.55/kWh Res $.75/kWh Commercial
7. Project Analysis
a) Basic Economic Analysis
Project benefit/cost ratio .21 (93,775/451.030) - fuel $ saved/cost of project
Payback 4.81 years (451,030/93,775) – cost of project/fuel $ saved
RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet revised 9/26/08 Page 3
Alaska Energy Authority ‐ Renewable Energy FundBUDGET INFORMATIONBUDGET SUMMARY:Milestone or Task Federal Funds State FundsLocal Match Funds (Cash)Local Match Funds (In‐Kind)Other FundsTOTALS1 WHR System $10,000.00 $28,280.00 $5,300.00 $43,580.002 Wind Turbine Integration $223,750.00 $10,500.00 $234,250.003 Thermal Node Installation $91,450.00 $8,500.00 $99,950.004 Hardwire Thermal Nodes $66,050.00 $7,200.00 $73,250.005$0.006$0.00Milestone # or Task #BUDGET CATAGORIES:123456TOTALSDirect Labor and Benefits $7,300.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $46,300.00Travel, Meals, or Per Diem $4,180.00 $13,790.00 $12,110.00 $6,860.00 $36,940.00Equipment $14,350.00 $14,765.00 $34,650.00 $6,500.00 $70,265.00Supplies $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $2,000.00Contractual Services $13,250.00 $161,500.00 $12,000.00 $16,000.00 $202,750.00Construction Services $2,700.00 $2,700.00Other Direct Costs $4,000.00$28,695.00$28,690.00$28,690.00$90,075.00TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES $43,580.00 $234,250.00 $99,950.00 $73,250.00 $0.00 $0.00$451,030.00RFA AEA09-004 Budget Form
October 8, 2008
Geoff Butler, Project Manager,
Village Community Building Energy Efficiency Program
5401 Cordova Street, Suite 303
Anchorage, AK 99518
(907) 562-3646
Connie Fredenberg
Special Projects Manager
TDX Power Inc.
4300 B St., Ste. 402, Anchorage, AK
(907) 278-2312
RE: Available Funds for Nikolski Community Center Heat Recovery
Connie, and whomever else it may concern,
ABSN is currently working under grants funded by the Alaska Energy Authority / Denali
Commission to complete energy efficiency projects in rural Alaska community buildings
with the goal of reducing utility costs to village entities. In Nikolski we have completed all
known lighting upgrades in community buildings and have been seeking other energy
saving projects to complete our grant projects in that community.
We have been working with Karen Plentnikoff of Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association,
and John Lyons of TDX Power over the last several months in hopes of completing a heat
recovery project to heat the Nikolski Community Center building. This project would
provide substantial and long-term fuel savings to the Nikolski IRA Council and is our
priority for energy efficiency projects in Nikolski.
We have approximately $10,000 in available funds that is presently slated for that project
to cover materials and/or labor to complete the job. Through past communications with
John Lyons, we understand the plan has been to install a heat recovery system to the
Nikolski community center from the nearby power plant, as part of the larger job of
connecting the recently installed wind turbine to the village power system. John Lyons has
done some preliminary work to assess materials and labor needed for the community
center heat recovery job.
Our grants for Nikolski terminate at the end of this year, which places a timeline on
funding availability. Due to costs and logistics of completing work in Nikolsi, we
2
understand completing this project is dependent on dovetailing the project with connecting
the wind turbine to the village power system. We understand this in turn is dependent on
acquiring additional grant funding. For the purposes of our grant funds, if additional
funding for the wind turbine connection comes available in the near term, we would need a
letter from TDX Power and/or APIA informing us of this status, and guaranteeing the heat
recovery project will be completed in conjunction with the wind turbine connection in
2009. Providing this takes place, up through December 15, 2008, TDX Power can invoice
ABSN for up to $10,000 for materials used to complete the heat recovery project for the
Nikolski IRA Council and the Nikolski community center.
This letter also serves as a letter of support for TDX Power to receive a renewable energy
grant through AEA and the State of Alaska to finish the final stages of completing the
wind diesel power system in Nikolski.
Sincerely,
Geoff Butler
Project Manager,
ABSN Village Community Building Energy Efficiency Program
Cc:
Karen Plentnikoff, APIAI
John Lyons, TDX Power
Tanya Kyle, Tribal Administrator, Nikolski IRA Council
ABSN - Village End Use Energy Efficiency Upgrade Projects – 2008 (907) 562-3646 Fax: (907) 770-5412
.High Penetration Wind-Diesel Project
Community of Nikolski, Umnak Island
Alaska
(
Aleutian Pribilof lslan-ds Association
Connie Fredenberg, Alternative Energy Coordinator
201 E. 3'(' ~ve.
Anchorage, AK 99501
I Phone: (907)222-4222
Fax: (907)222-4286
constancef@apiai.org
Environmental Report
Finding Of No Significant Impact