Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTok School Biomass Heating Project AppTable of Contents Section Regional School Board Resolution 1 Funding Application 2 Resumes 3 Feasibility Studies 4 Proposed Project Schedule 5 Map of Tok Area Wildfire Remediatioi 6 Available Biomass 7 Conceptual Design g State of Alaska Use Permit 9 Project Cost Estimate Summary 10 Cost Worksheet 11 Budget Sheet 12 Engineering & Business License 13 56C 1 Renewable Enerry ALASKA GATEWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION #08-03 AUTHORIZATION TO REQUEST FUNDS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY WHEREAS, the Alaska Energy Authority has grants funds available for application; and WHEREAS, the Alaska Gateway School District purchased 65,419 gallons of heating fuel for FY08 at Tok School; and WHEREAS, the price of heating fuel has risen to $4.09 a gallon during the past year; and WHEREAS, the average price of fuel has risen 12% per year over the past ten years; and WHEREAS, Tok School is located in the middle of the Tanana Valley Forest; and WHEREAS, the Tanana Valley Forest has available a vast quantity wood fuel for energy usage; and WHEREAS, the Alaska Gateway School District currently has approximately a two year supply of wood cut and decked to use as fuel on location at Tok School; and WHEREAS, the Tok Umbrella Corporation received a legislative grant for $500,000 to purchase a wood chipper; and WHEREAS, a wood furnace at Tok School would save approximately $ 100,000 on fuel costs per year; and WHEREAS, these fuel savings could be transferred into the instructional program to directly impact and provide additional opportunities for student learning; and WHEREAS, the mission of the Alaska Gateway School District is to work in partnership with communities to educate all student to be responsible citizens and reach their full potential; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of the Alaska Gateway School District is authorizing the administration to request funds from the Alaska Energy Authority thru the Renewable Energy Grant Program for the purpose of purchasing a biomass heating system at Tok School. ADOPTED by the Board of the Alaska Gateway School District this 7 h day of October, 2008 William MiWer, President &&4 6.z o Melinda Rallo, Vice -President /� W&M Renewable Energy Funew ArC Grant Application SECTION 1 — APPLICANT INFORMATION Name (Name of utility, IPP, orgovernment entity submitting proposal) Alaska Gateway School District Type of Entity: K-12 Public School Mailing Address Box 226, Tok Alaska 99780 Physical Address Mile 1313.5 Alaska Highway, Tok Alaska Telephone Fax Email 907 883 5151 907 883 5154 smacmanus@agsd.us 1.1 APPLICANT POINT OF CONTACT Name Scott MacManus Title Director/ Special Projects Mailing Address Box 226, Tok Alaska 99780 Telephone Fax Email - 907 883 5151 907 883 5154 smacmanus@agsd.ds , 1.2 APPLICANT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Please check as appropriate. If you do not to meet the minimum applicant requirements, your application will be rejected. 1.2.1 As an Applicant, we are: (put an X in the appropriate box) An electric utility holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity under AS 42.05, or An independent power producer, or A local, government, or entity (which includes tribal. councils and housing authorities); ttached to this application is formal approval and endorsement for its project by s board of directors, executive management, or other governing authority. If a ollaborative grouping, a formal approval from each participant's governing uthority is necessary. (Indicate Yes or No in the box) Vmental s an applicant, we have administrative and financial management systems and llow procurement standards that comply with the standards set forth in the grant reement. awarded the grant, we can comply with all terms and conditions of the attached rant form. (Any exceptions should be clearly noted and submitted with the pplication.) �� ALASHKA 2.1 of project you are proposing, (Recoi Conceptual Design; Final Design and Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Resource Assessment/ andfor Construction) as The Tok School Biomass Heating Project is a comprehensive proposal, from project Reconnaissance and Feasibility, to Design and Construction, and on to final commissioning of the facility in the fall of 2009. Using an automated wood chip heating system that will heat a 75,000 square foot facility, plus approximately 50,000 square feet of outbuildings, to largely displace the 64,000 gallons of heating fuel used in 2007-2008, and create an annual savings of at least $126,562 for this complex. This project will take'advantage of infrastructure that is currently in place.and activities that are underway to make our community safe from wildfire. It will convert the largest facility in the Tok area to a sustainable, cost effective fuel source, that is long term and has economic benefit to the region. It will allow the school district to improv6 the quality of education that is offered to our youth. The Reconnaissance piece is already nearly completed. Both preliminary and primary feasibility studies and analysis have been completed, and are included in the application, and both of which conclude that biomass programs will be cost effective, even were the wildfire remediation project were not in place and providing a sustainable source of fiber. The Conceptual Design is included in this proposal, and intends an automated wood chip boiler that is capable of heating the entire complex except during the most sever weather. Final Design, Permitting and Construction will be completed based on the enclosed project schedule, with commissioning of the facility. The project has approximately two years of biomass fuel currently decked on the school premises in place right now, with 200 more acres already funded for wildfire remediation. A conservative measure of 50 tons of biomass an acre, means that 10,000 tons of fiber is immediately available, where this project will use just 700 to 800 tons a year. By working closely with Tok Area Forestry to use the biomass identified by the Tok Area Wildfire Remediation Plan from the 3000 acres of dense forests. Section 4: Pre -feasibility Assessment for Integration of Biomass Energy Systems Connected Boiler load summary Fuel Chips cost analysis Economic Summaries 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a one paragraph description of your project. At a minimum include the project location, communities to be served, and who will be involved in the grant pro ect. AEA nq-nnn (rn,,, n , ,+, I--- ^ _r /� avam rM Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application The proposed biomass heating system will take place at Tok School, in Tok Alaska, and will serve to initiate the beginnings of a systemic regional conversion from fossil heating fuel to clean, renewable biomass heating systems. An outbuilding to house the boilers will be constructed behind the school, in a centra location where access to the outbuildings can also be had. The building will have 3 bays for fiber wagons that will to feed into the a feeder bin inside the boiler room. The boiler will be able to be fed from the inside or the outside of the building, to accommodate for downtime on the biomass feed systems. The biomass boiler will feed into the current boiler infrastructure, which will serve as a back up system, and will heat the outbuildings. The project has the advantage of being designed by firms having extensive experience with biomass systems, and is heavily supported by the community. It was written in partnership with the Tok Area Forestry, CTA Engineering, and by Alaska Gateway School District staff. amount of funds needed, the anticipated sources of funds, and the nature and source _ ns to the project. Include a project cost summary that -includes an estimated total cost n. A $3,207,000 grant from the Alaska Energy Authority is requested in this proposal that will cover all phases of the project, through final commissioning. The Tok Umbrella Corporation received a $500,000 legislative appropriation that will fund the purchase of a wood chipper, fiber wagons, and storage. The chipper will be operated by Tok Area Forestry to chip the biomass harvested from the wildfire fuel reduction project that will be used to fuel the chip boiler at Tok School, and will provide an important match for the project. The district currently has between 1000 and 1200 tons of biomass decked at the location of the project. Using the figure of $50 per chipped ton of biomass, this means that the district has between $50,000 and $60,000 in fiber available on hand. A detailed cost benefit estimate can be found in Appendix B 2.4 PROJECT SI Briefly discuss the that will result from an estimate of economic As is described in detail throughout this application, the immediate and most obvious benefit is the cost savings to the school district through the direct reduction of heating fuel costs for the district. Based on the current economic spreadsheet, assuming the entire project is funded, the school is estimated to save around $125,000 in fuel oil cost the first year, and with conservative inflation rates, would save or avoid costs of nearly $39,000,000 in 30 years. The project will also assist in the remediation of the wildfire threat to the communities in the Upper Tanana Valley, by using wood fiber that is removed during Wildfire Remediation programs as a heat source for Tok School, as a starting place. We would finally be able to turn the situation around and have a sustainable way of removing hazardous fuels from around our homes and AEA 09-004 Grant Aoclicatinn o� � A s nA (IED GKDALASKA Renewable EnergyFund ENERGY AUTHORITY Grant Application community, and a sustainable energy supply with an annual cost that we can afford and plan for. A sustainable economy will be nourished that does not export our hard earned dollars out of the local economy creating long term employment and opportunity. From these benefits move toward becoming self sufficient from a one time investment instead of endless request for more funds for energy cost. Lastly, safety for our families, schools and communities that will be the result of removing wildfire threat and instead using this material to power our future. We will begin to turn a state funded liability of hundreds of millions of dollars in firefighting, into an asset s worth millions of dollars, with the resulting project being used a model for a dozens of similar situations around the state proving what can be done with the states world class renewable resource of our forest The benefit's that this project will have on this community and the upper Tanana region is of paramount importance. Sustainability, self sufficiency and the safety of our community will be the result of using a local renewable resource for a long term energy that up to this date has been a liability and a looming annual threat of a disaster in the form of wildfire. This project will initiate the conversion from fossil fuel to a fiber based industry in the Upper Tanana that will create the foundation for creating heat and power from the renewable resource of the Tanana Valley Forest. A sustainable economy will be created that does not export hard earned dollars out of the local economy, creating long term employment opportunity. From these benefits we get started down the road toward becoming self sufficient from a one-time investment, instead of the endless requests for more funds for energy cost. A detailed cost benefit estimate can be found in Appendix B 2.5 PROJECT COST AND BENEFIT SUMAR` Include a summary of your project'' total costs you ne that number here and exl number in your application.) ��a,uuu,uuu over 30 years is of This benefit will be in how terms of long term jobs created, keeping funds in the community, and saving firefighting dollars. AEA 09-004 Grant Aooliratinn o� e 9 . ; ,ALASKA Renewable Energy 4NE-D ENERGY AUTHORITY Grant Application ,.._ - ,,,,, 0 — r 1nA1Mttu1=1WtN i; PLAN Pescribe-who will be responsible for managing the project end provide a plan for successfully completing the project within the scope, schedule and budget proposed in the_ application_ . 3.1 Project Manager Tell us who will be Managing the project for the Grantee and include a resume and references for the manager(s). If the applicant does not have a project manager indicate how you intend to solicit project management Support. If the applicant expects project management assistance The Project Manager and main point of contact will be Scott MacManus, who is also the principal investigator of this application. Mr. MacManus has had experience in project managements for both construction and education programs. He will coordinate the stages of the project between the district, engineer and construction companies and with the Alaska Energy Authority, ensuring timely completion of the project. Mr. MacManus will be assisted by Chris Rauch Distribt Maintenance Director, Nathan Reitz, from CTA Engineering, and Jeff Hermanns, Tok Area Forestry. Section #3 These resumes are enclosed: ■ Scott MacManus - AGSD, Project Manager • Nathan Ratz - CTA, Mechanical Engineer • Jeffery Hermanns- State of Alaska, Tok Area Forester • Nick Salmon - CTA, Civil Engineer ■ Todd Poage - AGSD Superintendent ■ Marion MacManus - AGSD, Business Manager • Christian Rauch - AGSD, Maintenance Supervisor 3.2 Project Schedule Include a schedule for the proposed work that will be funded by this grant. (You may include a chart or table attachment with a summary of dates below ) Project Schedule flow chart can be found in Section 5 3.3 Project` Milestones Define key tasks and decision points in our project and a schedule for achievingthem The kev tasks forth is nrnlACt AM nQ TAII, ,.,� Phase 1: Reconnaissance (completed) Phase 2: Feasibility Field Visit Pre -Feasibility Report Cost Estimate Grant Application Grant Award & Notice to Proceed Field Visit 35% Complete Design Development Documents AEA 09-004 Grant Application Pnna r f')A ALASKA ALA, Agencies, AGSD review & comment Phase 3: Final Design Complete Design Development Documents Complete Cost estimate/QA/QC Review AEA, Agencies, AGSD review & comment Complete Construction Documents Complete Cost estimate/QA/QC Review AEA, Agencies, AGSD review & comment Phase 4: Construction Bid/Negotiate Release Bid Date Award Procurement of Wood Fired Boiler/Fabrication Mobilization Begin mechanical integration with existing boiler room Complete mechanical integration with existing boiler room Begin construction of wood storage/boiler building 7 Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Complete construction of wood storage/boiler building Delivery of wood fired boiler Begin mechanical integration within wood storage/boiler building Complete mechanical integration within wood storage/boiler building Substantial Completion/punch list Commissioning Final Completion 1 YR Warranty Review attached section 5 Describe the personnel, contractors, equipment, and services you will use to accomplish the Project. Include any partnerships or commitments with other entities you have or anticipate will be needed to complete your project. Describe any existing contracts and the selection process you may use for major equipment purchases or contracts. Include brief resumes and references for known.. kev nersmi-IM rnnirnrfnrc n- Personnel: Professional design services will be determined through a competitive request for qualifications. Firms with experience in integrating wood -fired heating systems in to school buildings will be selected. Contractors: To be determined through competitive bid process and managed by the Construction Project Manager. Wood Fired Heating System Vendor. To be determined through a competitive bid process and managed by the Construction manager. Selection rubric for the wood fired heating system vendor will include project cost, ability to meet or exceed emissions standards, past Performance with projects of a similar size, ability to serve the Droiect nnra AEA 09-004 Grant ADDlication Pan. 7 F " /� ALASHKA complete, and ability to meet specifications. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Equipment: A new boiler building with storage capacity for four 25-30 ton chip trailers for wood fuel could be located approximately 150 feet from the existing boiler room, with good access for large trucks and chip trailers to maneuver. Wood fuel delivery vehicles would access the campus from the main access road and would back the vehicle into one of three overhead doors to the receiving conveyor. The hydraulics of the live bottom trailer would be connected to hydraulic equipment in the building and an empty trailer would be removed from an adjacent bay and filled with chips from logs decked on site or from other thinning projects and mills in the region. This approach to wood fuel processing minimizes the handling of the material, reduces contact with the ground (and potential sources of contamination) and provides the school with access to wood fuel in most weather conditions above 30 degrees below zero. The storage capacity of the facility should allow for approximately two weeks of wood fuel to minimize the need to chip wood fuel in severe weather conditions. The building includes storage for a chipper, which would allow the equipment to operate in colder temperatures. The overhead doors to the building would be 18-20 feet wide to allow 2 pairs of chip trailers (4 total) to be stored inside the building: The building would be heated with residual heat from the boiler or an in -slab radiant heating system to improve the performance and longevity of the chip trailers and chipping equipment. Services: Professional design services will be determined through a competitive request for qualifications. Firms with experience in integrating wood -fired heating systems in to school buildings will be selected. 3.5 Project Communications Discuss how you plan to monitor the project and keep the Authority informed of the status A communications plan will be developed as part of the project, and all engaged parties (Consultants, Contractors, Engineers, AEA Staff and AGSD Staff) will be briefed on the plan. Communications will be the.primary responsibility the Project Manager, who will work closely with Engineers and Contractors to ensure that each party understands their role, and what the time lines are, and will trouble shoot the issues that will arise during design and construction. 3.6 Project Risk Discuss potential problems and how you would address them While an attempt has been made to foresee the possible events and issues that ��U u uciay u1ty Niuject, or oinerwise cause problems bringing the boilers on line, there are scenarios where by problems may occur, as follows: Cost Increases that go beyond the scope of the proposal. Construction delays, to include equipment not being completed on time, or gaining the required approvals from the Fire Marshal and State DEC. AEA 09-004 Grant Application PaaP R of 94 ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application ■ Mechanical glitches with the equipment, eg; filtering out "stringers", or chip -wagons that freeze Clearly, all problems that come along will not be foreseen, however, ensuring that realistic planning timelines and project flowcharts are in place, contingencies developed, and ensuring that lines of communication are used, will reduce many of the problems that might otherwise occur. To some extent, installing liquidated damages agreements into each contract, and clearly outlining these at the start of each phase, with clear benchmarks in place, should serve to reduce delays. ` & 1`1- - 1'iFC7J Cl+I UCaI. C Kit'1 SUN AND TASKS • Tell us what the project is and how you will meet the requirements outlined in Section 2 of the RFA. The level of information will vary according to phase of the project you propose to undertake with grant funds. If you are applying for grant funding for more than one phase of a project provide a plan, and grant budget for completion of each phase. • If some work has already been completed on your project and you are requesting funding for an advanced phase, submit information sufficient to demonstrate that the preceding phases are satisfied and funding for an advanced phase is warranted. 4.1 Proposed Energy Resource Describe the potential extent/amount of the energy resource that is available. Discuss the pros and cons of your proposed energy resource vs. other alternatives that may be available for the market to be served by your project. The wood biomass that is available for use in this project is incredible. With the annual required biomass required, the estimated harvest would only require between 15 to 30 acres of the typical forest found within a 10 mile radius of the school if one was harvesting specifically for this use. The first source of material is the trees removed from the hazardous fuels reduction projects in the Tok Area. Over the last 18 years all of the material removed to create a safety zone around homes and business for defensible space has been burned in the open and at a tremendous cost. There has been very little use of this material for firewood with 99% being piled and burned. A Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) was signed off by the community and State of Alaska agencies in 2008. This was and continues to be a collaborative effort of community leaders and state and federal agencies to address the issue of the of material is extreme wildfire hazard the community faces annually. The second source is from Tok's two small, longtime sawmill businesses that have never had a use or market for the waste products from their milling operations. This includes tons of sawdust, planner shavings, and slabs. These materials are available for purchase at a very reasonable prices and could be a significant source of biomass for the school. This would be a tremendous benefit to the milling operations and the timber industry in the upper Tanana with a AEA 09-004 Grant AnDlication PnnP 4 of')A j�ALASHKA suuice or revenue never before realized in the interior of Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application One of the most basic and sensible approaches agreed in the CWPP to was the remove of the hazardous fuels surrounding our homes, schools, businesses, Public building, communication facilities, roads and highways. Currently State of Alaska Forestry is working on a realized grant agreement with US Fish and Wildlife Service Tetlin Wildlife Refuge funding of approximately $180,000 dollars to be used by October 2009 for the removal of hazardous fuels in the Tok Area. This includes the Tok School where 50 Acres of hazardous fuels (spruce trees) are being selectively removed and decked for future chipping. This will be approximately 1000 Tons of biomass alone. An additional 70 acres will be harvested on nearby Red Fox road less than 3 miles from the school, which will generate an estimated 2100 tons of biomass that could be used at the school. Additionally 60 acres will be thinned and removed from around senior citizens homes in the Tok Area. This will generate an additional estimated 100 to 300 tons of biomass for the Tok School. This biomass/ hazardous fuel (spruce trees) have never had a use or value but have been a real cost and liability to the land owner and the State of Alaska. This hazardous material (biomass) will now have a value. of $50 to $70 dollars per Ton. There is a goal over the next 5 to 10 years to remove 3000 acres of highest priority hazardous fuels in the Tok area. This is a hundred year rotation just within the highest priority areas for fuel removal for the Tok School. The total stand of high volume hazardous fuels is over 39,000 acres in Tok. By having a value for the material it will make it possible to sustainable remove this fuel with and turn a real liability into a real value. This simply cannot be overstated on the importance of this to the Tok community. At the historic cost per acre it would require $7,500,000 million dollars of funding to remove this hazardous fuel. This is far more fuel than the school alone could use but would have a minimum value of at least $50 per ton or at least $4,500,000 million dollars for biomass fuel. Thirdly, are the clearing operations for private land development, highway, road construction and the clearing for any future pipeline construction. The forth supply is the growing, ongoing timber harvest operations for firewood and sawlog production in the area. Approximately 40 % of the forest is not suitable for commercial firewood or sawlog products and is left on the ground, on the harvest unit landing or disposed of in the log yards. This is at a considerable cost to the timber harvest operators with an unrealized use for the material. This material could be utilized and transported in chip form or log form to the mill and or school and sold for biomass fuel. This material alone could annual heat the Tok School. Our issue is going to be not having enough capacity to fully utilize the tremendous biomass resource we have, not finding enough. The constraints of harvesting timber on federal land are not an issue in the Tok Area, where the vast majority of land available for harvest being State of Alaska land including land designated as State Forest and private land with native corporations of Tanacross, Tetlin and Doyon. There is widespread agreement among all landowners to this project and the harvest of hazardous fuels or timber products in the Upper Tanana. Section 6: Hazardous fuels man AEA 09-004 Grant Application Pa❑a in of 9d 1�ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application source of revenue never before realized in the interior of Alaska. One of the most basic and sensible approaches agreed in the CWPP to was the remove of the hazardous fuels surrounding our homes, schools, businesses, public building, communication facilities, roads and highways. Currently State of Alaska Forestry is working on a realized grant agreement with US Fish and Wildlife Service Tetlin Wildlife Refuge funding of approximately $180,000 dollars to be used by October 2009 for the removal of hazardous fuels in the Tok Area. This includes the Tok School where 50 Acres of hazardous fuels (spruce trees) are being selectively removed and decked for future chipping. This will be approximately 1000 Tons of biomass alone. An additional 70 acres will be harvested on nearby Red Fox road less than 3 miles from the school, which will generate an estimated 2100 tons of biomass that could be used at the school. Additionally 60 acres will be thinned and removed from around senior citizens homes in the Tok Area. This will generate an additional estimated 100 to 300 tons of biomass for the Tok School. This biomass/ hazardous fuel (spruce trees) have never had a use or value but have been a real cost and liability to the land owner and the State of Alaska. This hazardous material (biomass) will now have a value of $50 to $70 dollars per Ton. There is a goal over the next 5 to 10 years to remove 8000 acres of highest priority hazardous fuels in the Tok area. This is a hundred year rotation just within the highest priority areas for fuel removal for the Tok School. The total stand of high volume hazardous fuels is over 39,000 acres in Tok. By having a value for the material it will make it possible to sustainable remove this fuel with and turn a real liability into a real value. This simply cannot be overstated on the importance of this to the Tok community. At the historic cost per acre it would require $7,500,000 million dollars of funding to remove this hazardous fuel. This is far more fuel than the school alone could use but would have a minimum value of at least $50 per ton or at least $4,500,000 million dollars for biomass fuel. Thirdly, are the clearing operations for private land development, highway, road construction and the clearing for any future pipeline construction. The forth supply is the growing, ongoing timber harvest operations for firewood and sawlog production in the area. Approximately 40 % of the forest is not suitable for commercial firewood or sawlog products and is left on the ground, on the harvest unit landing or disposed of in the log yards. This is at a considerable cost to the timber harvest operators with an unrealized use for the material. This material could be utilized and transported in chip form or log form to the mill and or school and sold for biomass fuel. This material alone could annual heat the Tok School. Our issue is going to be not having enough capacity to fully utilize the tremendous biomass resource we have, not finding enough. The constraints of harvesting timber on federal land are not an issue in the Tok Area, where the vast majority of land available for harvest being State of Alaska land including land designated as State Forest and private land with native corporations of Tanacross, Tetlin and Doyon. There is widespread agreement among all landowners to this project and the harvest of hazardous fuels or timber products in the Upper Tanana, Section 6: Hazardous fuels map AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 10 of 24 9/3/2008 /� ALASKA 4.2 Existing Energy System Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application 4.2.1 Basic configuration of Existing Energy System Briefly discuss the basic configuration of the existing energy system. Include information about the number, size age, efficiency,and type of generation. The Tok School is approximately 75,000 SF in size and includes school, detached multipurpose building housing an ice hockey rink and shooting range with a detached Zamboni garage. The school is heated with a pair of fuel oil fired hot water boilers each with a 3,000,000 Btu/hr capacity (output). The existing boiler operates at approximately 80% efficiency. A 1,000,000 Btu/hr (output) domestic hot water for lavatories and showers has a 600 gallon capacity and represents a portion of the fuel oil use for the facility. The existing domestic hot water heater operates at approximately 80% efficiency. 4.2.2 Existing Energy Resources Used Briefly discuss your understanding of the existing energy resources. Include a brief discussion of any impact the project may have on existing energy infrastructure and resources Based on the last two years of fuel consumption, the facility uses approximately 46,250 gallons of fuel oil each year at a current delivered cost of $4.10/gallon or $190,000 per year, and the campus (including the school) uses approximately 56,600 gallon per year at a cost of $231,900. The school, as the primary customer for heating fuel in the region, will have a negative impact on the market for heating fuel following a transition to biomass fuels that reduces consumption by 41,625 a year. However, most of the cost of that fuel is transferred outside the community, whereas the costs for biomass will remain in the community. Section 6: Hazardous fuels map Section 7: Decked wood photo 4.2.3 Existing Energy Market Discuss existing energy use and its market. Discuss impacts your project may have on energy customers. i ne exisung energy use in the 1 ok Area and Upper Tanana consists of fuel oil, propane, cordwood, wood pellets, wood chips and electricity. The use of fuel oil over the last two years has dramatically shrunk in the residential market to an estimated 5 to 20 % of the total heating energy. Most people have added wood stoves and or outdoor wood boilers and are planning to heat mostly with wood and using oil only for a backup. The primary use for heating fuel oil is with state and federal government offices AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 11 of 24 9/3/2008 ORITY ALASHKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application and buildings and with some commercial businesses because of the lack of suitable alternatives. Some businesses are using the outdoor (Central) wood boilers but they are very smoky and inefficient. Fuel oil will have some of the market in the area for a long time, due to its dependability in cold weather and as a backup system which is a must in this part of Alaska. Fuel oil is expensive, and currently costs 4.10 a gallon. Propane is not used for heating by much of anyone. Propane freezes at minus 40 degrees and so is not well suited to this country. Propane is the choice for cooking stoves. Propane has become very expensive, and costs $79 for a 1001b tank. Cordwood is a large market in the area, and is growing rapidly around the entire state for residential use and for some business applications. Cordwood costs between $150 and $200 dollars cut and delivered. The demand for cordwood has created a supply shortage this year as the price has increased with demand. Most of the trees in the upper Tanana are not cordwood trees. If the school were to burn cordwood it would be in direct competition for the cordwood with the residential market that cannot meet current market demand. Wood pellets are becoming increasing popular and are being imported into the area from as far away as Idaho, and costs between $200 and $300 a ton. If a local manufacturer were to start producing pellets consistently, the wood pellet market would greatly expand for residential and commercial use. One person currently is burning wood chips in a homemade sawdust and chip stove to heat their home and greenhouse. There is no current market or use for sawdust, wood chips or small diameter trees that will not make cordwood. The school project would not be competing with anyone for this biomass material. In fact it will help reduce the cost for timber harvest operations by enabling them to be more efficient in the harvest of firewood and saw -logs by giving them a market for the 30% of their current harvest that is slash, and for which they curently have no market. Lastly electricity in the upper Tanana is extremely expensive being it's generated from diesel. No one that I know heats with electricity and everyone uses it very sparingly for lights and necessities. Even with Power Cost Equalization, it is cost prohibitive for most people and business. The power company currently has no realistic plans to produce reasonable power by any other mean within the next few years. AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 12 of 24 9/3/2008 /" ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application 4.3 Proposed System Include information necessary to describe the system you are intending to develop and address potential system design, land ownership, permits, and environmental issues. 4.3.1 System Design Provide the following information for the proposed renewable energy system: • A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location • Optimum installed capacity • Anticipated capacity factor • Anticipated annual generation • Anticipated barriers • Basic integration concept A new boiler building with storage capacity for four 25-30 ton chip trailers for wood fuel could be located approximately 150 feet from the existing boiler room, with good access for large trucks and chip trailers. Wood fuel delivery vehicles would access the campus from the main access road and would back the vehicle into one of three overhead doors to the receiving conveyor. The hydraulics of the live bottom trailer would be connected to hydraulic equipment in the building and an empty trailer would be removed from an adjacent bay and filled with chips from logs decked on site or from other thinning projects and mills in the region. This approach to wood fuel processing minimizes the handling of the material, reduces contact with the ground (and potential sources of contamination) and provides the school with access to wood fuel in most weather conditions above 30 degrees below zero. The storage capacity of the facility should allow for approximately two weeks of wood fuel to minimize the need to chip wood fuel in severe weather conditions. The building includes storage for a chipper, which would allow the equipment to operate in colder temperatures. The overhead doors to the building would be 18-20 feet wide to allow 2 pairs of chip trailers (4 total) to be stored inside the building. The building would be heated with residual heat from the boiler or an in -slab radiant heating system to improve the performance and longevity of the chip trailers and chipping equipment • A description of renewable energy technology specific to project location: The Tok School will use a biomass boiler to help heat the school. Wood chips will be made from timber harvesting in the region and burned in the boiler to heat water which will circulate through the school to heat the school. A new boiler building with storage capacity for four 25-30 ton chip trailers for wood fuel could be located approximately 150 feet from the existing boiler room, with good access for large trucks and chip trailers. Wood fuel delivery vehicles would access the campus from the main access road and would back the vehicle into one of three overhead doors to the receiving conveyor. The hydraulics of the live bottom trailer would be connected to hydraulic equipment in the building and an empty trailer would be removed from an adjacent bay and filled with chips from logs decked on site or from other thinning projects and mills in the region. This approach to wood fuel processing minimizes the handling of the material, reduces contact with the ground (and potential sources of contamination) and provides the school with access to wood fuel in most weather conditions above 30 degrees below zero The storage AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 13 of 24 9/3/2008 /� ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application capacity of the facility should allow for approximately two weeks of wood fuel to minimize the need to chip wood fuel in severe weather conditions. The building includes storage for a chipper, which would allow the equipment to operate in colder temperatures. The overhead doors to the building would be 18-20 feet wide to allow 2 pairs of chip trailers (4 total) to be stored inside the building. The building would be heated with residual heat from the boiler or an in -slab radiant heating system to improve the performance and longevity of the chip trailers and chipping equipment The wood fired boiler is estimated to have an output capacity of 4,000,000 Btu/hr, or approximately 60% of the likely existing boiler and domestic hot water peak load. Typical load profiles for schools show that approximately 90% of the boiler run hours occur at 60% of the peak load or less. This will allow the wood boiler to operate in medium and high fire mode as often as possible which optimizes efficiency and reduces emissions. An energy model of the facility would be developed during the design process to optimize the boiler size. Anticipated capacity factor: The anticipated capacity factor is 0.26. Unlike a power plant with a consistent base load, a biomass boiler is used to heat a building, which has a variable load. The amount of heat generated is directly proportional to outside air temperature. This capacity factor is actually two to three times better than the existing connected heating equipment. Based upon current fuel oil consumption, the wood boiler is estimated to use 800 tons of wood fuel each year. The Tok School is immediately adjacent to large forested areas where active thinning is occurring, creating a steady supply of fuel in close proximity to the facility. Thinning in the region typically generates more than 100 tons of material per acre. The school could be heated on an annual basis with material from less than 10 acres per year. The material is likely to be staged in log decks similar to drying processes used at lumber mills. Storing the wood fuel in this manner will minimize handling of the trees and potential sources of contamination (from soil and rocks). The wood fuel can be accessed throughout the winter and chipped directly in to a chip trailer. This project will not produce electrical energy, however, the combustion of 800 tons of wood fuel is projected to produce 7,900,000,000 btu's of heat energy for space heat and domestic hot water. Anticipated barriers: Some anticipated barriers would be: The wood fired heating system vendors are not in close proximity to the project site. This will result in delays in shipping the equipment to the project site. Service and technical support for the project are not in close proximity to the project site. This will result in additional costs during the first year of operation to provide additional training and support. Access to wood fuel in winter will present processing problems in severe weather. The building could be expanded to include storage for a chipper, which would allow the equipment to operate in colder temperatures. The overhead doors to the building could also be 18-20 feet wide to allow 4-5 chip trailers to be stored inside the building. The building would be heated with residual heat from the boiler or an in - slab radiant heating system to improve the performance and longevity of the chip AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 14 of 24 9/3/2008 ALASKA and chipping equipment. Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Basic integration concept: The biomass boiler building would be constructed on the same side of the building as the existing boiler room. A primary — secondary pumping system would be utilized to allow the biomass boiler to be the primary boiler and allow the fuel oil boilers to operate to supplement the biomass boiler in peak heating conditions and/or at other times when the biomass boiler is not functioning. The main boiler room is currently located on the exterior of the school building on the west end of the facility. A new boiler building with storage capacity for four 25-30 ton chip trailers for wood fuel could be located approximately 150 feet from the existing boiler room, with good access for large trucks and chip trailers. Wood fuel delivery vehicles would access the campus from the main access road and would back the vehicle into one of three overhead doors to the receiving conveyor. The hydraulics of the live bottom trailer would be connected to hydraulic equipment in the building and an empty trailer would be removed from an adjacent bay and filled with chips from logs decked on site or from other thinning projects and mills in the region. This approach to wood fuel processing minimizes the handling of the material, reduces contact with the ground (and potential sources of contamination) and provides the school with access to wood fuel in most weather conditions above 30 degrees below zero. The storage capacity of the facility should allow for approximately two weeks of wood fuel to minimize the need to chip wood fuel in severe weather conditions. The building includes storage for a chipper, which would allow the equipment to operate in colder temperatures. The overhead doors to the building would be 18-20 feet wide to allow 2 pairs of chip trailers (4 total) to be stored inside the building. The building would be heated with residual heat from the boiler or an in -slab radiant heating system to improve the performance and longevity of the chip trailers and chipping equipment. Deliveries should be scheduled to minimize conflicts with other activities on the school campus. Delivery methods: The biomass boiler building would be constructed similar to any school capital project. The building and systems would be designed by licensed professionals who will generate construction documents to be bid out to contractors. The successful contractor would then mobilize and construct the building. Section 8 Biomass Boiler Building Schematic Building placement map 4.3.2 Land Ownership Identify potential land ownership issues, including whether site owners have agreed to the project or howyou intend to approach land ownership and access issues The project will be constructed on land owned by the School District, directly adjacent Tok School. Section 9: Use A reement from the State of Alaska AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 15 of 24 9/3/2008 /4NrD ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application 4.3.3 Permits Provide the following information as it may relate to permitting and how you intend to address of applicable permits cipated permitting timeline List of applicable permits Approval to Construct, from the State of Alaska Fire Marshall (approximately 30 days) Department of Education and Early Development Review and Approvals (approximately 5 days) Air Quality Review, from the Department of Environmental Conservation The bid documents will be issued to the building department on April 6, 2009 for review. A permit is expected to be issued by June 1, 2009. Anticipated permitting timeline The boiler output is likely to require review by Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Air Quality. Modeling of the stack height and emissions is recommended. An environmental engineer will be responsible for modeling the stack height and determining the emissions requirements for the boiler selected. The air quality permit process will begin once a wood heating system vendor has been selected May 1, 2009. A permit is expected to be issued by June 30, 2009. Identify and discussion of potential barriers No significant barriers are anticipated for either the building permit or air quality permit. Compliance with local air quality standards can be readily met by many wood heating system vendors. If additional air quality protections are requested by the Alaska Gateway School District or required by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Air Quality the construction contract would be modified to include those items. The items may be bid as additive alternates during the bidding negotiation phase of the project to determine the cost of additional air quality controls and to expedite the procurement of those items. Address whether the following environmental and land use issues apply, and if so how they will be addressed: • Threatened or Endangered species • Habitat issues • Wetlands and other protected areas • Archaeological and historical resources • Land development constraints • Telecommunications interference • Aviation considerations • Visual, aesthetics impacts • Identify and discuss other potential barriers There are no identified Endangered species in the Upper Tanana. The habitat issues are few. The Tok Area is on a glacial outwash comprised of sand and gravel. There is no permafrost in the immediate area and very limited permafrost within a 25 mile radius of Tok. Most of the ground is suitable for year around timber harvest operations. The major habitat issue is the natural cycle of large wildfires in the Tok area comprising hundreds of thousands of acres in single fires. This in essence creates a large single aged stand and forest succession AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 16 of 24 9/3/2008 /4wKF:)) ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund 401r--) ENERGY AUTHORITY Grant Application that is never ideal for wildlife. Small mosaic of fires on the landscape is much better habitat. By having active forest management and breaking up the continuous stands of spruce fuel there is much reduced chance of large fires on the landscape. Alaska Department of Fish and Game is in support of our project and active timber harvest in mature stands of spruce. Timber harvest mimic fire and create new areas for browse for moose and upper land game such as ruffed grouse. Many timber harvest projects have been jointly planned for habitat improvement between Forestry and Fish & Game in the area and will continue into the future. Tok again is on a glacial outwash and has very limited wetlands. Wetlands in not an issue in the Tok Area. There are limited Archaeological and historical resources in the area, this has never been a restriction to development or timber harvest activities in the past 50 years in the Tok Area. Those areas that are identified are largely on Native owned lands, where there are strict controls. The land development constraints are just the short construction season in the upper Tanana from June through September for all earthwork. There are no zoning constraints with any local government of any kind including no borough. Telecommunications interference is not an issue. There are no negative Aviation considerations for the project or harvest operations. IF there is less fires there would be less smoke and that would be a great benefit for the all aviation activities. Visual, aesthetics impacts are minimal with the harvest of hazardous fuels and timber in the area. The harvest activities are limited in size and are never seen from the highway. Any impact is short term in duration with a vigorous rate of reproduction of aspen from coppice (20,000 trees per acre sprouting in the 1990 burn) and spruce from natural seeding in the Tok Area of up to a foot of growth annually. Timber harvest is much preferable to large burns such as the 100,000 plus Tok River fire that scorched the land in 1990 or the million acres of large burns in the Tok Area in 2004. The primary environmental barrier we have in the Upper Tanana is the extreme cold temperatures. It is difficult to harvest timber in temperatures colder than 30 below zero. We have several weeks a year that will reach 30 below and colder. This will not be a prohibiting factor for the supply of biomass for this project. A minimum of one months supply will be on hand in chip vans at all times. Additionally biomass will be stored in tree length decks in Tok that will be chipped through out the winter by a chipper stored in the heated building. Harvest of timber in winter has taken place in the Upper Tanana for over 70 years. Lastly a very positive proactive approach to burning the hazardous fuels for biomass rather than letting it burn in forest fires will have a huge positive impact on the air quality. New research by major universities is finding large quantities of suit and other pollutants from wildfires much more damaging to the atmosphere than once thought and may be a contributing factor to the global climate change. 4.4 Proposed New System Costs (Total Estimated Costs and proposed Revenues) The level of cost information provided will vary according to the phase of funding requested and any previous work the applicant may have done on the project. Applicants must reference the source of their cost data. For example: Applicants Records or Analysis, Industry Standards, Consultant or Manufacturer's estimates. AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 17 of 24 9/3/2008 /� ALASKA 4.4.1 Project Development Cost Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application Provide detailed project cost information based on your current knowledge and understanding of the project. Cost information should include the following: • Total anticipated project cost, and cost for this phase • Requested grant funding • Applicant matching funds — loans, capital contributions, in -kind • Identification of other funding sources • Projected capital cost of proposed renewable energy system • Projected development cost of or000sed renewable anarmr Q"cfam Requested grant funding: Grant Funds Requested: A $3,245,349 grant from the Alaska Energy Authority is requested. The Alaska Gateway School District does not have the ability to borrow funds for the project. $251,211 will be used for project design of the integrated complex. Applicant matching funds: The Tok Umbrella Corporation has already received a $500,000 grant for the purchase of a chipper, chip trailers and expansion of the building to store the chipper. The school district has recently thinned adjacent forest areas in order to reduce fire hazard. A portion of that material has been decked on site and will be available to heat the facility during the first year of operation. This material will save the school district $60,000 to $120,000 in fiber costs during the first year of operation. Section 10: Estimate of Probable costs of design and construction 4.4.2 Project Operating and Maintenance Costs Include anticipated O&M costs for new facilities constructed and how these would be funded by the applicant. • Total anticipated project cost for this phase How will 0&M costs be funded? The project operation and maintenance costs will be funded from the regular budget of the school district, and the reduced cost of energy to heat the school each year. Requested grant funding. Funding will not be needed for O&M. The grant will help reduce the annual loan payments and result in greater assurance that the reduced cost of energy to heat the school each year can be used to enhance the educational mission of the Alaska Gateway School District. 4.4.3 Power Purchase/Sale The power purchase/sale information should include the following: Identification of potential power buyer(s)/customer(s) • Potential power purchase/sales price - at a minimum indicate a price range Proposed rate of return from grant-fi rnrtari nmior+ AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 18 of 24 9/3/2008 Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application N/A 4.4.4 Cost Worksheet Complete the cost worksheet form which provides summary information that will be considered in evaluating the project. Section 11 Application Cost Worksheet AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 19 of 24 9/3/2008 /ORITY � ALAUTAUTENERGYHKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application 4.4.5 Business Plan Discuss your plan for operating the completed project so that it will be sustainable. Include at a minimum proposed business structure(s) and concepts that may be considered The District proposes to fully develop a business model that will initiate a conversion from fossil fuel to wood fiber, and to use wood fiber garnered from local wildfire remediation efforts, and from the district's own property. The issues that will be addressed in the fully developed plan are: • Appropriate acquisition of fiber ■ Methods of storage and delivery of bio-mass • Long term supplies • Economical use of available resource ■ Personnel ■ Operations and Maintenance costs • Integration with local economy • Environmental impacts, if any 4.4.6 Analysis and Recommendations Provide information about the economic analysis and the proposed project. Discuss your recommendation for additional project development work The project was evaluated using a 30-year cash flow analysis. A basic benefit to cost (B/C) ratio was calculated as well as accumulated cash flow. Accumulated cash flow is similar to simple payback with the exception that accumulated cash flow takes the cost of financing and fuel escalation into account. For many building owners, a positive accumulated cash flow of about 10 years maximum is considered necessary for implementation. Positive accumulated cash flow in year one indicates a strong project. Positive accumulated cash flow in year 20 or more indicates a challenged project. The existing conditions section of the analysis is based on data collected at the school. The cost of wood chips ($60/ton is based on estimates from the local Department of Forestry office which has recent data on thinning operations in the area. The biomass boiler efficiency was assumed to be 65%. Wood fired boilers efficiencies can reach 70% to 75%, so 65% is conservative. The wood chips in the Upper Tanana are assumed to be at approximately 35% moisture content after a year being decked, yielding 5400 Btu/Ib. Power is very expensive in Alaska compared to the continental US. Because of this the cost of the additional electricity used by the new boiler plant was accounted for in the analysis. The power use is based on historical data from a wood fired school boiler plant in Darby, Montana, and is estimated at approximately 55,000kw annually. The O&M inflation rate was assumed to be 5%. The fuel cost escalation for petroleum based fuels was estimated at 12% annually which is based on historical data since September of 1990. Fuel cost escalation for wood based fuels was estimated at 6% annually. AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 20 of 24 9/3/2008 /4 A L A S M Renewable Energy Fund d1VD ENERGY AUTHORITY Grant Application At low loads, the biomass plant will not be able to sufficiently turn down to operate efficiently. During these times, the fuel oil boilers will operate. Also at the building peak heating load, the biomass boiler will not be large enough, so the fuel oil boilers will operate to supplement the heating system. Because of these two reasons, it is assumed the biomass system will supplant 90% of the facilities fuel oil use. Based on discussions with other biomass system users, system manufacturers, and estimates of operator time required, additional operation and maintenance time on average of 4 hours per week were assumed. The cost of this over a 40 week operation period at $20/hour was used for the analysis. In addition, experience has shown that the first two heating seasons have extra maintenance time as the system "bugs" are worked out and the maintenance staff learns the system. The analysis includes an additional 4 hours per week for the first two years to account for this. Economics based on the very conservative estimated project costs and the assumptions listed above were assembled and is shown on the attached summary. With the project fully funded, the economic analysis shows a positive cash flow in the first year of approximately $89,000 in fuel savings, and a positive accumulated cash flow (PAC) of $1,387,000 in year 10, $4,609,000 in year 20; and $11,943,000 in year 30. This indicates a strong project. The simple payback is 32 years. The B/C ratios are 0.94 at year 15; 1.62 at year 20; and 4.19 at year 30. Since the project is expected to have a 30 year life, a B/C ratio greater than 1.0 in year 20 indicates a strong project. SECTION 5— PROJECT BENEFIT Explain the economic and public benefits of your project. Include direct cost savings, and how the people of Alaska will benefit from the project. The benefits information should include the following: • Potential annual fuel displacement (gal and $) over the lifetime of the evaluated renewable energy project • Anticipated annual revenue (based on i.e. a Proposed Power Purchase Agreement price, RCA tariff, or avoided cost of ownership) • Potential additional annual incentives (i.e. tax credits) • Potential additional annual revenue streams (i.e. green tag sales or other renewable energy subsidies or programs that might be available) Discuss the non -economic public benefits to Alaskans over the lifetime of the project The Energy Information Administration indicates that over the past 10 years, the price of heating fuel has increased from 97.7 a gallon in March of 1998, to 3.839 a gallon in March of 2008. (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/whoreus4w.htm) On the high end, in FY08 (2007-2008) the Tok School complex consumed 65,419 gallons of heating fuel. Using that amount at the price of 4.09 a gallon, and increasing that price by 13% a year, (which is the ten year average), by 2018 the district will spend over $800,000 a yearjust to heat a single school. Using average fuel consumption figures, (56,567 gallons), and a more conservative estimate of 10% annual increase for heating fuel, it will cost Tok School $545,532 annually. At that rate, in 30 years, if heating oil is AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 21 of 24 9/3/2008 40K--) ENERGY AUTHORITY Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application still even being used as a heat source, it will cost $3,670,069 annually to heat the school. The immediate public benefit is that this project will have, is to allow the school district to spend less dollars on facilities, and more dollars in the classroom teaching children, which is the mission of all schools. Our district spends a disproportionate level of financial resources on heat and power. To the school district in the short term, the project means that we could hire an itinerate counselor, or a music teacher. Assuming a successful project, the district will initiate a systemic conversion from fossil fuel to biomass fuel at two more sites, Northway and Tanacross. Northway is a 30,000 gallon a year facility, and Tanacross where this 15,000 gallon a year project will be a partnership with the community, offsetting the heating costs of a whole community. In the long term, this project could be what initiates the beginning of a systemic energy conversion in Interior Alaska, moving the region from to a renewable biomass energy source.. The school is the largest single consumer in our small community, followed by the DOT and State Forestry complex, which is also invested in this conversion. Initiating a conversion to biomass in the form of Wildfire remediation will simultaneously make our communities safer, supply a sustainable form of low cost heating fuel for our schools, initiate a regional conversion from fossil fuels to biomass, and be the foundation of an industry that will create long-term viable timber industry employment for the - residents of the Upper Tanana. 5.a.ii Heat: 50,913 gallons (from economic spreadsheet) 5b. $208,743 (from economic spreadsheet) Section 4: Economic Summary SECTION 6 - GRANT BUDGET Tell us how much your total project costs. Include any investments to date and funding sources, how much is requested in grant funds, and additional investments you will make as an applicant. Include an estimate of form - The total cost of the project is projected to be $3,805,349, including the boiler building, boiler and connecting infrastructure, fiber wagons, and chipper. $500,000 in cash is already in hand for this project, along with $60,000 to $120,000 thousand in -kind, in the form of decked fiber on the applicants premises. Section 10: Estimate of probably cost of design and construction. Section 12: Grant budget form AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 22 of 24 9/3/2008 ALASKA Renewable Energy Fund Grant Application SECTION 7 — ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WITH YOUR APPLICATION: A. Resumes of Applicant's Project Manager, key staff, partners, consultants, and suppliers per application form Section 3.1 and 3.4 B. Cost Worksheet per application form Section 4.4.4 C. Grant Budget Form per application form Section 6. D. An electronic version of the entire application per RFA Section 1.6 E. Governing Body Resolution per RFA Section 1.4 Enclose a copy of the resolution or other formal action taken by the applicant's governing body or management that: authorizes this application for project funding at the match amounts indicated in the application - authorizes the individual named as point of contact tq represent the applicant for purposes of this application - states the applicant is in compliance with all federal state, and local, laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations. F. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that this application for a renewable energy grant is truthful and correct, and that the applicant is in compliance with, and will continue to comply with, all federal and state laws including existing credit and federal tax obligations. Print Name Todd Poage Signature Title Superintendent Date October 7th, 2008 AEA 09-004 Grant Application Page 23 of 23 9/3/2008 • s t` A FINAL DRAFT Pre -feasibility Assessment for Integration of Biomass Energy Systems in Tok School Tok, Alaska October 3, 2008 Presented by CTA Architects Engineers Nathan Ratz & Nick Salmon For Alaska Gateway School District CTA Project: AGSD_TOK Executive Summary The following assessment was commissioned to determine the technical and economic feasibility of integrating a wood fired heating system in the existing Tok School located in Tok, Alaska. The Tok School is approximately 75,000 SF in size and includes school, detached multipurpose building housing an ice hockey rink and shooting range with a detached Zamboni garage. The school is heated with a pair of fuel oil fired hot water boilers each with a 3,000,000 btu capacity (output). A 1,250,000 btu (input) (1,000,000 btu output) domestic hot water for lavatories and showers has a 600 gallon capacity and represents a portion of the fuel oil use for the facility. The facility currently uses approximately 46,250 gallons of fuel oil each year at a current delivered cost of $4.10/gallon or $190,000 per year. The 10,000 gallons of fuel consumption associated with the multipurpose building and Zamboni garage is does not appear to warrant spending an additional $700,000 in buried pipe and integration costs. If the price of fuel oil were to rise substantially !in the future, providing a second heating loop.the multi -purpose building, or future buildings might be considered. For the purpose of this investigation it is assumed that the wood fired boiler would serve only the school building. Energy Analysis• For the purpose of this investigation it is assumed that 90% of the +existing annual fuel oil consumption could be offset by the combustion of wood chips or wood pellets in a boiler approximately''/2 the size of the combined capacity of the fuel oil boilers. Modeling energy consumption would establish a more precise wood boiler size for the facility. The wood heating system would be sized to meet approximately 90% of the typical annual heating load of the building, using the existing boilers for additional capacity in peak load conditions, and for future expansion. Electrical energy consumption is projected to increase with the installation of the wood fired boiler, conveyors, augers, compressors and a pair of circulating pumps. The cash flow analysis accounts for the additional electrical energy consumption and reduces the annual savings associated with using wood fuel rather than fuel oil. Building & Site Constraints: The main boiler room is currently located on the exterior of the school building on the west end of the facility. A new boiler building with storage capacity for three 25-30 ton chip trailers for wood fuel could be located approximately 150 feet form the existing boiler room, with good access for large trucks and chip trailers. Wood fuel delivery vehicles would access the campus from the main access road and would back the vehicle into one of two overhead doors to the receiving conveyor. The hydraulics of the live bottom trailer would be connected to hydraulic equipment in the building and an empty trailer would be removed from an adjacent bay and filled with chips from logs decked on site or from other thinning projects and mills in the region. This approach to wood fuel processing minimizes the handling of the material, reduces contact with the ground (and potential sources of contamination) and provides the school with access to wood fuel in most weather conditions above 30 degrees below zero. The storage capacity of the facility should allow for approximately two weeks of wood fuel to minimize the need to chip wood fuel in severe weather conditions. The building includes storage for a chipper, which would allow the equipment to operate in colder temperatures. The overhead doors to the building would be 18-20 feet wide to allow 2 pairs of chip trailers (4 total) to be stored inside the building. The building would be heated with residual heat from the boiler or an in -slab radiant heating system to improve the performance and longevity of the chip trailers and chipping equipment. Deliveries should be scheduled to minimize conflicts with other activities on the school campus. Fuel Suooly: Tok School is immediately adjacent to large forested areas where active thinning is occurring, creating a steady supply of fuel in close proximity to the facility. As of this writing, approximately 1200 tons of decked spruce are in place, ready for chipping. Recent yield assessments in the region typically generates between 50 and a 150 tons of wood fiber per acre. The school could be heated on an annual basis with material from less than 15 acres per year. Wood pellets are not currently being produced in bulk quantities in the region. Wood pellet fuel may also freeze in extreme temperatures if stored in exposed grain bins rather than with a heated building. For this reason a wood pellet heating system was not explored in greater detail. Air Quality Permits:. Air quality permit requirements in Tok should be reviewed in greater detail. The boiler output is likely to require review by Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Air Quality. Modeling of the stack height and emissions is recommended, and is built into the project costs. Estimated Costs: The total project costs including integration, contingency and escalation are estimated as noted on the attached spreadsheet. Results of Evaluation The cash flow analysis assumes delivered fuel oil costs of $4.10/gallon, wood chips at a locally delivered price of $60 per green ton. Wood Chip Options: Option A.1: Appears to achieve positive accumulated cash flow (PAC) in 1 year with a subsidy of $2,848,000. The project may achieve PAC in 18 years without subsidy. 30 years savings (avoided costs) are approximately $8,000,000 to $11,000,000. Accumulated cash flow is the primary evaluation measure that is implemented in this report and is similar to simple payback with the exception that accumulated cash flow takes the cost of financing and fuel escalation into account. For many building owners, a positive accumulated cash flow of about 10 years maximum is considered necessary for implementation. Positive accumulated cash flow in year one indicates a strong project. Positive accumulated cash flow in year 20 or more indicates a challenged project. Proiect Fundin The Tok Umbrella Corporation has already received a $500,000 grant for the purchase of a chipper, chip trailers and expansion of the building to store the chipper. The Alaska Gateway School District is pursing a grant from the Alaska Energy Authority Renewable Energy Program. The project might be of interest local rural electric and telephone cooperatives. Rural electric and telephone cooperatives have the ability to provide a portion of the project financing through the Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant (REDLG) program. The school could enter into a performance contracts for the project. Companies such as Siemens, McKinstry, Johnson Controls and Chevron have expressed an interest in participating in funding projects of all sizes throughout the Western United'States. This allows the facility owner to pay for the project entirely from the guaranteed energy savings, and to minimize the project funds required to initiate the project. Next Steos7 The Tok School appears to be a good candidate for the use of a wood biomass heating system. Modeling the energy use would establish the appropriate size and energy savings associated with the boiler. It is recommended that a detailed energy analysis and cost estimate be developed to refine the project economics with grant support from the Alaska Energy Authority grant program. Attachments: • Diagrams of biomass heating system and wood fuel storage facility. • Cost estimate. • Cash flow analysis. Alaska Gateway School District Tok School Fuel Oil Use Summary Building Fuel Oil Use - Gallons FY07 I FY08 AVG School 37571 54930 46251 Multipurpose Building& Zamboni Garage 10144 10489 10316 Totals 477151 654191 56567 Connected Boiler Load Summary Output MBH Peak Load Factor Likely System Peak MBH School Boiler 1 3000 0.6. 1800 Boiler 2 3000 0.6 1800 D W H 1000 1.0 1000 School Total 7000 4600 Multipurpose Building Boiler (Heat) 1528 1.0 1528 Boiler DWH) 346 1.0 346 Zamboni Garage Boiler 140 1.0 140 Remote Buildings Totals 2014 2014 Campus Total 9014 6614 Proposed Biomass Boiler Size Likely System Peak MBH Biomass Bailer Factor Biomass Boiler Size MBH School Total 4600 0.6 2760 Remote Buildings Total 2014 0.6 1208 Campus Total 6614 3968 School Heating System Capacity Factors Heat Enerav Produced Gals Btu/ al Input Btu Assumed Efficient Heat Energy Prod. Btu 56567 138690 7.85E+09 0.8 6.28E+09 Maximum Potential Out ut - Existinq Boilers nnectedOutput Btu/hr F9( Weeks of O eration Possible Btu Capacity Factor 14000 36 5.45E+10 0.12 Maximum Potential Output - Biomass Boiler Connected Output Btu/hr Weeks of O eration Max Possible Btu Capacity Factor 3968000 1 36 2.4E+10 0.26 � gas l d �IIIII 1�111111111111 ®IIIII IIIII�IIIIIIIIII �I II�1i11111111111El ®Ilill�lillilllllllllll ®Illllilili1111111111g ■Illllllllll�illll�lll ®Illllllllllllllllllll Elilitililillillillliii ■ 11111 1 i i 11111111111111 ®lllllifill111111111111 oil, III 1lrilll Illll II ■6111�IIIIIIIIIIIII�I ■IIIIIIIKIIII ]11 mI IllIlrllllllllUS ■IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIII�I �IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■�IIl�iili111111111111 � llll�li 111111111111 ■Illll�lii1111111111111 �IIIII�IIIIllllllllllll �I�III��IIIIIIII1111111 �IIIII�llllllllllllllll � I � 111111111111111111 .t J t(' mU a N N m O O h m N m ¢ 10 O N N U N m 0 m o N m m o m N Y N m C N K �?��umi oino U I mmmmm g m N m N � ¢00000 d ¢ G IL [O m O y T c m N m O C N p Q¢NNomm L O.Y '-Nm O y m N C6 m m N win yi vie E ommwm� o mm t0 E `o C m _I C m N m m N m N m fY ; GO n r r r mmmmm W m u> es us vi m w L a a {ap C OF2e y �'2°Ze� U N 3 Zvi _ m�d�r O C m N m O O O O U NC! LL c O m m E — C ' C m a 0 m O'c ui 0 ui m i m i irm i m n _ m S2 m V a d m a E i. N m (Y m C.N. m N ai N ai 3 o �y N NNN N -O a m O O O O O O O O O L _ t U m o�mm�tim 0 0 0 0 p 2 Q U m m m a N N N N m Z m U N m N m N > mr O U m N n c N m O N O m U N m m o o N m m m¢ r N et N C T mY^Hoorn U m N n m 0 h m 0 m m¢ o 0 0 0 0 p N N o m m p U mmoia 0 N U l r m< v Q (O N N m N m m m � ' a m Mnn m! U ommo U N O m Il: N L Oo Qaymr�mv m L n r m O m >� Nlnmmm U ci.�ro mi E E Q¢nmmm� m 4> o v m o rn N !9 NNN IIAA i9 fA N f9 E V C a N Lo N mmm N N N Lc o `` � O cNN IQ Nub C C> m m'. w m m O p m QNia N N N N N H r»�wia W m 3�mi�omi�� _ O m N tL C mj CV m [V I(J E pC U ��o aa�a�ae W 0 0 0 0 0 O E ui ui ui vi vi a - m m U � 'B,m ammm mm 3 E E�, Ul m ai N aim NNN mi of N a a m L O O O O O s O 0-^O Rt Ei o Z S 4FC MZ Nt 04 Nt 60 0:� 60 AO 6010 60 dE 60 on 60 Ir 60 Nr co G 60 Ab9 C 60 ?Jd' 0 t- 60 Wi m 60 8d. d 60 NH vJ Cam) 80 d 80 IL so 0 M O a` o c a) V1 pQ E O N C E C N C ,N > a)o E (DE E o- a.NU2�EE ��E��E E � Y w o d� 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 iL_ N¢ oLL o 0 oU 0 oU 0 a 0. 0-0 ❑U0Ud0 NUcU om E co co m = o (DC\'J U' ii (DZ Q,� a m 05 o> 0 o` o a7FD 2 z E N E 3 p 0) 00 W CO U W U) rnQ rn o Q o Q (D U ❑ U 0 N U aci o o.aa)iU ¢(D V QQ O. O Q O Q ai oQ c oUQ U< c m Z o< Q Q L c a cn ❑ 0 co (D y C p W LL iz U r N m 0 N a7 0 ccu m m L L L a a a a N 0 0 a7 0 0.-.- O O aQ. . m a) a) .0 .0 LL 0 a `a) (Dw , c c C C 'U O U N C C a a)Doc`a os E O U U Ni Lam_ n �E E— 3 3 0 0= a O C c 0 0 (D c a)cu C �•233❑oam o O C0 E O m cmC C O J C) co 2.200 CD - '- U U N U U ` •C N n C o M O 5- V U U IL 0 W C 0 EEmZ C d in O. O1 Z O m E U O U S FC V n N I i rpri L F BIN I STA K� eunv - PUMPS BOILER ROOM TOT DUST WALL METERING BIN ann m CHIP TRA LER (BK40x10) 2630 TON CAPACITY CHIP TRAIL 25J0 TON ORAOLIC CONTROLS - FUEL STORAGE 302 ______ I RECEIVER CHIP — HYDRAULIC CONTROLS I CHIPPER i I 0 BIOMASS BOILER BUILDING SCHEMATIC A m SCHOOL TOK 1/0'=T-0 rA r- TOK m Ip 03.09 NORTH REP. w in W Z J 0Y m rr Z Vr ix N Z in W D LL LLI W N O a a J �e Q PL SE4L't TONYXNOWLES, GOVERNOR u GOLDBELTPLACE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 801 WEST 10THSTREET. SUITE200 ✓UNEA U. ALASX4 99801-1894 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER (907) 465-2800 FAX (907) 465-4156 Larry Weisz, Sr., President Alaska Gateway School Board P.O. Box 226 Tok, AK 99780 July 24, 1998 RECEIVED AUG m 3 1998 AK GATEWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT TOK , AK 99780 Re: Notice of Termination of School Facilities Use Permit and Issuance of New Use Permit in Conformai.ce with Regulations of the Department of Education. Dear Mr. Weisz: Consistent with 4 AAC 31.090(i), the State of Alaska, Department of Education ('Department") hereby gives notice of termination of the outstanding USE PERMIT entered by and between the Department and the Alaska Gateway School District for the use of State owned or leased property (land and/or buildings) for public elementary and secondary school purposes. This termination is made in accordance with Section V (b)(2) of the Use Permit, as the current permit is not in compliance with 4 AAC 31.090 ("Regional School Board Use Permits"), which became effective on May 21, 1997. A replacement Use Permit which incorporates all regulatory requirements has been issued and included under this cover and shall take effect simultaneously with the termination of the former Use Permit. Please direct any questions regarding this termination and issuance of the new Permit to Michael Morgan, Facilities Manager, State of Alaska, Department of Education. Sincerely, hirley J. Holloway, Ph.D. Commissioner Enclosure cc: Dr. James Elliott, Superintendent Alaska Gateway School District Philip Reeves, Assistant Attorney General Department of Law Michael Morgan, PMP, Manager Regional School Board Use Permit This Regional School Board Use Permit ('Permit") is issued by the State of Alaska, Department of Education ("State") to the Alaska Gateway School District School Board ('Board") pursuant to the authority of AS 14.08.151, as implemented through 4 AAC 31.090. This Permit allows the Board to occupy and use those State owned or leased properties described herein, in strict conformance with all terms, conditions, provisions and definitions set out in 4 AAC 31.090. This Permit covers the property generally described as: See attached Appendix A and in addition covers any other property defined in 4 AAC 31.090(j)(4). The Board shall promptly notify the State if it believes that* this list is inaccurate or incomplete. This Permit takes effect upon receipt by the Board and remains in effect indefinitely unless and until modified or terminated in accordance with 4 AAC 31.090 or other applicable law. The Commissioner of the Department of Education is the designated agent to 'act on behalf of the State in all matters pertaining to this Permit, except where context or state law requires otherwise. All communications relating to this Permit shall be mailed to the Commissioner of Education at the current address. DATED this-1 'day 4 ;J;ZKJ - 1998. Shirley Holloway, Ph.D. Commissioner Regional School Board Use Permit Appendix A ,SEC to ESPMATE OF PROOMLE COST OF DESIUN IS CONHIAUCL v1pM'NOO ewpi 1 MI TON 9tlIml BlamueXu 9nlem C3AprehlLela evglvee pevean.o.a mlOkm� e:v-® mnn e. FW AWOme(MgAMmGnNrc Wood clip 0v01nrwNM1 MI Bup Cem Come ObRYwd lmnl PS Mee. erN MR.IM.11n1amNOn. NSRI e4'#n c..Mcearrt 14 r . W NO MASS 801LEM AND STACK SYSTEM WVW F'tu Xae Sn1om 92 MMtlIItlI Ou Xm Wnlm 1 5345000.00 5Sm., 555000A0 3Escov HOO.WO tlaM §e®2nr 1 SIS WO.W 515Wp £5WOY0 £ZOWp San I s+s wp.m wWB ssOw00 ssum ss.pw $50.0DO I H]O,Bw TOTAL-BTu-BiBAuss eoaEnsysrEMs H]0.ow BD1LER euatlixc coHs Div PnN Suitlam-Halal SnbanGm4 98110 n WOW S2ID.W0 fW.00 6000 H50,Wo SLm p Hss.Wa TDrAI. Beuar Bmm HSGOW enILGO1G MECIWIrCY C08'(s ).slS ameYY WNer 5 .a mrcW 1 Irr msWmed top i 525.w RWo slaw stew H,0 Yi'BgLNeOGv rLW6 1]E 6 §B.w H )5 SR9w00 E1925 S3 50W0 Pn u% S VLre f ass S2Wp.w R.opp 53TI00 . 5320 R.32Y 4cldc Walm Xuler Mir 1 sl.m.w vim UR. Rlp Sul SanCe S. 1 SM.W SBR MOnp SIaO 611B0 6W 8 aem 2'PVC D'W'V 120 tl 1 mis pB0 SIMI S2.100 VS q'PVCB WV Alv I W.w 3W §T.w S,A. b1'. nM 3 S575rw 51.I25 M. 51E2 $1.01] A'xdnrxde PWrl 1 N L 51,22Ew S1.w0 SIOw.w 51,0 52w0 SOe 111iYa'a 1.12md ' Welm Se^ile Irem811-H§. I5O O Sl.w R40 R.18 $]23 W49 T 6 eglS 9'w Y0'0%15011 1w H50 53Io il'. 51.350 52100 0• VG 6ewef Mtin 2W v §IO.w R•WO HW SIAM WO Trerc" bBeWi 4'w%CJx25011 .0 N90 SI}A STU RSW RWO PC ComgNun O�c.Yn1x w0 nm SI.M 5720 SO.]5 VAN H,])p 1Owen 56 u im.00 0. SIOON $1.00E H2Oe canwomn.n a Hw.w sI.320 bR.pO RW S2.34o Hu H. WdIwP' f t2'WWaletlC inn MA P,wO Elpm Sis. 54,WN O'Imu'a1eO EImM SIGN 1W v moo S%4W SEEM R}w b18.0.50 IluOmweaevva4r mwl arremMss 2 1 1. SmOssm SM,O ssmw •S50w R wG IIM. H9alm 4 SWo.00 ES MO E1w.w &apo "'WS UM Heaw i' Avwn 4 S.B.w R.wo R.. 520m SS,ioO MbCanYMtlKP L4mm.N9 1 n W.wp.p0 M. SSb OwI §S.Ow SMOR Cmvala 1 B S5 M.. WAR ESow.. SS,O, et0,w0 PIaN ENctrealWwk 1 is mp.is R500 MA... 5125. ]w0 Em 6mermm )SKW )b H75M SML625 WOm Was H0,125 StlW H 219 TOTAL- BOIER BUILMG MECITAMICA COSi6 b104.S15 SUBTOTAL BUILDING & BOILER 51.122.213 MECXANIM INTEGRATION COS]5 N Nbtlml Hu1NO Xm Wmgr 4•Pn Yngmetl PSYlem 0e4ry Gnu 390 L f00w RB.000 6:A.w S1TSo0 H5,500 q'I.uhlM Bkrk 51aeI1FOvve 6raCe IM i HER MAN =. 53,060 E OaWO O'wia'OxiSO ISO NW.W MISR ESSW SS. R,Ma wmentl wsar Xeal Eara e I 30=03 owo.. stow.. S30o0.B0 R24wA0 blac.eaawe wdm comm.me 1 n WAR.. W.wO ss.pw.w ss.ppp sto,wo nllm LO. 1 ly RWB,W RWO II.5w.w E2.500 E5.w0 EIu11Mdl YlmN 1 n Pl.w 5p W.pp §0 5E $ M0 494,566 Nm001B BWdI NaWq dWad PIpM �PRw P" §slam RabmGMe Iwo g £L0.. b1Es w0 SWABM. WOOw SMB wO IMIARMaretl 4•I.Wtu BIe45,SN pwe Gra.1 210 n Ho.w W,wp M. £O.em Sta wo rewn etlmaln e'wtlz]Wn f.. Soap ss.]en WW H,]]O IRM MkcmvmOui Plgm Camm.nc 1 I515 w0.m S15.00040 R M.m 53=00 614pw.00 rAaulmvWlmam mmwhnam' regaN 2 n 55.00sw SILMI, S.... S10Bw R04w0 ram o.B cwuma 2 N II.500.0o ss.wB Ao WAoo s1o.wO IBC91 wam 1 N W.SO so W.00 W £O Si°n'us, Rer rR TBTAL- GNAxrcAL prt RATION cosTB eR W .U.TS nno>.)w G. Cmdlbrc a LpnmeemrW14 FIRS ML 5E9.512 SUBTOTAL $1.I5].2m BtlOMa u.2W3SYE1.BR.113 90 W% WO I3iONSTRUCNON §2 H)gmm rteuer epl6reb SSORmm wn 1 n aWOW.00 M.A.O SIEOw aseMlm Sum nmgmm 1 n M. WWO 55nw cpnunA:tim Marenm rma 1 M Es.... sswp 54Aw Bud6 PemW 1 h 3),Sw.w SI SR S7,5w urvnaN Lamnsslbe 1 B $IBM'. H5,u0 SISow w .e mm t n ss.0a0.R ss0oo W.wO W Pb'md I n ss pw.m ss,m0 W ooB RII,I SUBTOTAL BOFTCOSTS y251 S11 §2yl nll PRECONTINGENCV PROJECT TOTAL 32.7 4- CONTINGENCY RwX WOe92 RECOMMENDED PROJECT BUDGET- DESIGN ANG CONSTRUC TION COSTS g3,296,348 SEC- %k 'pALASKA Renewable Energy Fund ENERGYAUTHORITY Application Cost Worksheet Please note that some fields might not be applicable for all technologies or all project phases. Level of information detail varies according to phase requirements. 1. Renewable Energy Source The Applicant should demonstrate that the renewable energy resource is available on a sustainable basis. Annual average resource availability Unit depends on project type (e.g. wi 2. Existing Energy Generation Bio-Mass, need 20 Acres annual output, biomasss a) Basic configuration (if system is part of the Railbelt' grid, leave this section blank) i. Number of generators/boilers/other 2 heating fuel boilers ii. Rated capacity of generators/boilers/other 3,000,000,000 each iii. Generator/boilers/other type Burnham, using heating fuel iv. Age of generators/boilers/other 13 years v. Efficiency of generators/boilers/other 75% b) Annual O&M cost (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Annual O&M cost for labor Approx. $1000 ii. Annual O&M cost for non -labor $231,900 for heating oil c) Annual electricity production and fuel usage (fill in as applicable) (if system is part of the Railbelt grid, leave this section blank) i. Electricity [kWh] Est. 10,000 ii. Fuel usage Diesel [gal] 56,6000 Other iii. Peak Load 6,000,000,000 iv. Average Load 1.2 btu v. Minimum Load 0 vi. Efficiency 75% vii. Future trends Cost for heating fuel has gone up 12% on average annually since 1991. d) Annual heating fuel usage (fill in as applicable) i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] 56,000 ii. Electricity [kWh] $10,000 I The Railbelt grid connects all customers of Chugach Electric Association, Homer Electric Association, Golden Valley Electric Association, the City of Seward Electric Department. Matanuska Electric Association and Anchorage Municipal Light and Power. RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheel revised 9126108 Page 1 ��ALASHKA Renewable Energy Fund iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] vi. Other a) Installed capacity 3,968,000 btu/hr b) Annual renewable electricity generation i. Diesel [gal or MMBtu] ii. Electricity [kWh] 55,000 per/Kw iii. Propane [gal or MMBtu] iv. Coal [tons or MMBtu] v. Wood [cords, green tons, dry tons] 800 tone of fiber. vi. Other a) Total capital cost of new system 3,707,000 b) Development cost 199,364 c) Annual O&M cost of new system $126,562 d) Annual fuel cost $5600 in heating fuel and $40,000 in fiber at market value, or $2,000 for years one and two. 5. Project Benefits a) Amount of fuel displaced for i. Electricity +25,000 KwH ii. Heat $126,562.00 iii. Transportation b) Price of displaced fuel c) Other economic benefits d) Amount of Alaska public benefits 6. Power Purchase/Sales Price a) Price for power purchase/sale Creating jobs, saving funds to improve education. RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet revised 9126108 Page 2 /4'1EDALASKA Renewable Energy Fund MILD ENERGY AUTHORITY 7. Project Analysis a) Basic Economic Analysis Project benefit/cost ratio 10.71 Payback 13 ye RFA AEA 09-004 Application Cost Worksheet revised 9126108 Page 3 S%4L I Z T i� •L O Q T 0) a) C w N Y N co a Z O Q O LL LZ F- LU CD cl D m } a D m F- LU D m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O r 0 0 0 O O N m O u07 r LO ON Cl)C)O co Cj (O J 64 61 N r� O Lf) a 1 4 6N 69 0 F- In C L N L O O a O C O L Y 69 co C N U J LL L O L C:)U O O a3 U O U) LL] U C 64 J LL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C)omo��o� O O N O r 64 'd' C) O O) O N , �- Cl) W O � M LO O J F69 V N r Cl) Lo co O 64 6% F- (O p O O 64 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N (f? 6'3 O O po00 In. o O p o 0 o O O O 00 O O{ M C o rn O o r 0 of IQ, C) o ui ai co Lo � � � 1 V 64 r r M 64 64 64 O O Cl) O O O 0 0 O O O O O O r r 00 O r r O O 10 I- N O O M 1- r 0 C) 61) Cl) N 64 Ef3 64 Ui O O O O O O O O O N_ co LL C)7 r N C\1 CO N (m0 (D 61) N U O O O O 00 69 69 N co) (D-0 "O C LL LL � C C O y. N C w .A C m .N ❑ C •U ..�.. N C a m F° L O aa) LL' (1) LL E LL u O U =3 LL o .. O r N co CI' LO C m 0 0 0 0 O w w 0 w w N a7 L n.aaaa a7 L w L m L a1 L cG r N (h �t t0 (O N O O O O O O LO In O 64 r N N 64 64 H O M O O O C 64 O O O O O N r eR73 64 E W _N W N ❑ n p K N (D = O m n. H m N (n U U ?, ui (n a L C W Of O m O U N W J .� U ` ❑ U a) ❑ N > 5 Q C C L F- co ❑ I� LU in 0 U 0 5Tcc 115 T� CTA is licensed in the State of Alaska under the following license numbers: CTA Business License Number is 299774 CTA Architectural and Engineering License Number is 84071-F 306 N. Railroad Aw. Ste. 104 Missoula, Montana 59802 406. 728.9522 Pae: 406. 728.8287