Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPA2706FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT No.7114 SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FINAL REPORT MAY 22,1985 DOCUMENT No.2706 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: CASE E-VI AND ADDITIONAL CASE C OPERATING REGIMES ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY_--.I ER:CONTRACT'TO ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS F THE PROPOSED SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT ON INSTREAM TEMPERATURE AND FISH RESOURCES IN THE WATANA TO TALKEETNA REACH VERSITY OF ALASKA TIC ENVIRONMENTAL ORMATION AND A CENTER A[ffi~~t=~~~®©@ SITNA JOINT VENTURE 2706 4.3.1.2 - -~ Decurrent No. Susitna FHe No. ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED SUSITNA HYDROELECTRI~,PROJECT ON INSTREAM TEMPERATURE AND FISH RESOURCES IN THE WATANA TO TALKEETNA REACH SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: CASE E-VI and ADDITIONAL CASE C OPERATING REGIMES ) Report by Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center Under Contract To Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture Itt\ !Lf~ .S~ FLj~~ ()D .;;l.-=1O~ Prepared for Alaska Power Authority Final Report May 22,1985 ARLIS Alaska Resources Library &Information Services lUlchorage,Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. LIST ()F FIGURES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••ii LIST OF TABLES.........................................................iii LIST ()F APPENDICES.....................................................iv S~RY• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 INTRO:DUCTION ••••••••••••••a'a ••••,e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •3 -1 PURPOS E AND SCOPE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• BACKGROUND •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 6 METHODS.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 INSTREAM TEMPERATURE MODELING ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• YEARS SELECTED FOR SIMULATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• INSTREAM FISHERY RESOURCE ANALySIS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 9 11 RESUL,TS AND DISCUSSION.................................................16 PROJECT EFFECTS ON'INSTREAM TEMPERATURE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summ.er ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Win ter ..•••..•...•..•••.•.•.•••••.•.....••••.••••.••••••...•. EFFECTS OF PROJECT-RELATED TEMPERATURES ON FISH RESOURCES ••••••••• Introduction .••.•....•.••••.•.••.•.•••.••.•.•.••.•....•.•.•.• Case C Warmest water Compared to Case C Inflow Matching •• Case E-VI Inflow Matching Compared to Case C Inflow Matching ....•....•......•........•....•..•••.........•.. Case E-VI Warmest Water Compared to Case C Warmest Water ••••• CONCLUS ION,S.~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 16 23 24 25 25 26 28 29 30 'REFEltENCES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •31 AFPE~mICES•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••III-• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••33 L .... 0 N I'""-eo M 0 0 0 LO LO ן'""- M M i _1 ,.- """ Figur,e No. LIST OF FIGURES Page No. 1.Map of the Susitna basin study reg~on••••••••••••••••••••••••7 -- - - -! 2.Susitna River drainage basin fish species by study zone......9 ii """1 Table No. LIST OF TABLES Page No. 1.Temperature simulations for Case E-VI considered in this r~port ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••5 - 2. 3. 4. Water weeks for water year n •••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••11 Salmon temperature tolerance criteria for Susitna River drainage 13 List of fish species found to date in the Susitna River between RM 100 and Devil Canyon ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••14 .- ..... I 5.Comparison of water temperatures (C)at RM 130 (LRX 33) for Case C and Case E-VI •••.••••••••••••••••••.•••••.•.•••.••17 6.Mean summer water temperatures (C)for water weeks 31-52 at RM 130 for 1981 and 1982 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••21 7.Mean winter water temperatures (C)for water weeks 5-30 at RM 130 for 1981 and 1982 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••22 iii -I - -LIST OF APPENDICES A.Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations comparing natu- ral and with-project conditions. B. ...... C.- D•.... - - Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperature tolerance criteria for natu- ral.Case C "warmest water."and Case C "inflow matching"conditions • 'Temperature chronologies at three middle river·locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperature tolerance criteria for natu- ral.Case C "inflow matching"and Case E-VI "inflow matching"conditions. Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperature tolerance criteria for natu- ral.Case C "warmest water"and Case E-VI "warmest water"conditions. • iv - - - .- SUMMARY 'This report presents the results of weekly instream temperature simula- tions for the SusitIla River comparing Watana-only and Watana/Devil Canyon project configurations under a)Case E-VI and Case C "inflow matching", b)Case E-VI and Case C "warmest water",and c)Case C "inflow matching"and "warmest water"operating regimes.Results of Case C "inflow matching".simu- lations have been analyzed in a previous report ·(AEIDC 1984b)and a detailed explanation of methods employed in instream temperature modeling are presented there.Case E-VI simulations were obtained from the SNTEMP instream tempera- ture model using historic hydrologic/meteorologic data covering two summers and (me winter.The effect of these temperatures on anadromous and resident fish species is specific to temperature tolerance criteria established in AEIDe:(l984b). Simulated downriver temperatures under Case E-VI are quite similar to those under the Case C flow regime.Under a Watana-only configuration,summer tempE~ratures from Case E-VI operations are virtually identical to those of Case C.Slight temperature differences appear under Case E-VI with the addi- tion of the Devil Canyon dam,generally cooler overall,with warmer tempera- tures occurring later in the summer. Winter simulations under Case E-VI show little variation from Case C sim- ulations under a Watana-only configuration.Addition of the Devil Canyon dam results in consistently slightly cooler river temperatures under the Case E-VI operating regime. Effects of attempts to pass warm water downriver during winter differ little from the inflow temperature matching model runs.Also,since Case E-VI differs only slightly from previously-analyzed Case C,the effects on fishery 33RD3-008 - 1 - resources from Case E-VI are essentially the same as presented in AEIDC (1984b)• 33RD3-008 - 2 - - - .r-- - ...... - - INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report summarizes an assessment of the effects of changes in down- stream thermal properties in the mainstem of the Susitna River resulting from various operational scenarios for the proposed Susitna hydroelectric project. Examined specifically are the effects of temperature changes on instream fish- ery resources due to the Case E-VI operating regime (Harza-Ebasco 1984).The approach to conducting an assessment of the effects of the proposed Susitna project on fishery resources of the Susitna basin has been described in AEIDC (1984b).This report is a supplement to that previous analysis. An overview of the temperature assessment program for Susitna hydroelec- tric project environmental studies was provided in AEIDC (1984b).Reservoir opera,tions and reservoir temperature simulation models,operated by Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture,are used to predict reservoir outflow dis- charge and temperature conditions associated with various power load demands in either the one-or two-dam configurations.These forecasts are then used by AEIDC as input data to an instream temperature simulation model,SNTEMP. The SNTEMP model predicts either natural or with-project instream temperat:ure conditions.Currently,temperature simulations are run using average weekly time steps.Various combinations of meteorological and flow conditions are imposed on the reservoir operations,reservoir temperature,and instream tem- perature models in order to examine the effect of diverse climatic conditions on i1l1stream temperature. This report describes the expected temperature changes and associated ef- fects on fish resources in the Watana':'to-Talkeetna mainstem reach of the Susitna River.Although temperature predictions for the Susitna River are 33RD3-008 - 3 - provided downstream to the the Parks Highway bridge at Sunshine,fish assess- ments are only provided to RM 100 above the Chulitna confluence due to the lack of confidence in river temperature predictions in the extensively braided zone below Talkeetna. For simulation purposes t the year has been divided into two segments, winter and summer.The winter period extends from September through April, while the summer period includes the months of May through September.Note that the month of September is included in both summer and winter simulations. Spawning occurs through September,yet the beginning of incubation also occurs in September;therefore,this month is included in both simulation periods to better assess temperature effects on both life phase activities. Examined in this report are natural and with-project simulations for two summers and one winter.Two load demand years were examined for with-project simulations,that of Watana in the year 2001 t and the Watana/Devil Canyon con-' figuration of 2002.Two methods of operating the multi-level intake struc- tures are examined for each of these cases:"inflow matching"where water is selected which most closely matches the natural influent temperature,and "warmest water"releases where the warmest obtainable water is released throughout the year.This latter option has been introduced -as a means to limit ice formation downstream from the reservoirs,and thereby limit the slough overtopping associated with freezeup staging.All simulations consider the intake structures as described in the FERC license application (Acres American 1984).The 15 simulations covered in this report are summarized in table 1. -., - 33RD3-008 - 4 - - -Table 1.Temperature Simulations for Case E-VI considered in this report Season/Watana Watana/Devil Canyon Year Natural 2001 Demand 2002 Demand ~Inflow Warmest Inflow WarmestI Matching Water Matching Water SummE~r 1981 X X X X X SUmmE!r 1982 X X X X X WintE!r 1981-82 X X X X X - 33RD3-008 - 5 - The temperature assessment criteria previously developed and presented in AEIDC (l984b)are updated and utilized in this report in order to directly compare the effects of the Case E-VI operating regime with other cases exam- ined previously.These criteria were based on field investigations of fishery resources as well as literature assessment and a specific laboratory investi- gation conducted by the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (Wangaard and Burger 1983). BACKGROUND The Susitna River drains an area of 19,600 sq.mi.and flows 320 mi.from its origin to the Cook Inlet estuary in Southcentral Alaska.Major tributar- ies include the Talkeetna,Chulitna,and Yentna Rivers (figure 1). The proposed Susitna hydroelectric project consists of two dams to be constructed over a period of about 15 years.The Watana dam would be complet- ed in 1994 at a site three miles upstream from Tsusena Creek.This develop- ment would include an underground powerhouse and 885 ft high earthfill dam, impounding a reservoir 48 miles long with a surface area of 38,000 acres and a usable storage capacity.of 3.7 million acre/ft (maf).Installed generating capacity would be 1020 megawatts (Mw)with an estimated average annual energy output of 3460 gigawatt hours (gwh). The concrete arch Devil Canyon dam would be completed by 2002 at a site 33 miles downstream of the Watana dam site.This dam would be 645 ft high impounding a 26 mile-long reservoir with 7,800 surface acres and a usable storage capacity of 0.36 maf (Acres American 1983).Installed generating ca- pacity would be 600 Mw,with an average annual energy output of 3450 gwh. Watana reservoir would be drawn down during high energy demand winter months - 33RD3-008 - 6 - 1 I J 1 i ])1 1 ]1 j ....... Figure 1.Map of the Susitna basin study region, +10 Rive,mile Increment. and filled during summer months when energy requirements in Southcentral Alaska are lowest.Devil Canyon reservoir would be operated with less fluctu- ation in water surface elevation. Seven anadromous and 13 resident fish species are known to inhabitat the Susitna drainage~with 6 anadromous and 10 resident fish species found from the Watana dam site to the Parks Highway bridge (figu~e 2).Construction and operation of the Susitna hydroelectric project is expected to affect aquatic resources in the basin by altering the normal thermal regime of the river. Mainstem water temperatures downstream from the dams will be cooler in summer and warmer in winter than those currently found.A change in the ice regime downstream from the project is also expected due to altered temperatures and increased winter flows. METHODS INSTREAM TEMPERATURE MODELING A computer version of an instream water temperature model (Theurer et al. 1983)has been used to analyze the downstream temperature changes associated with the Susitna hydroelectric project.The instream water temperature model (SNTEMP)predicts longitudinal,cross-sectioned averaged,mean weekly tempera- tures throughout a stream network.Application of this model to the Susitna basin has been previously discussed in (AEIDC 1983,1984a,1984b).For a com- plete description of the model,reference is made to Theurer et al.(1983)and AEIDC (1983). Water weeks are used as the averaging time period.The first water week - begins on October 1.All water weeks are seven days long except the fifty-second week which is eight days long;February 29 is not considered when 33RD3-008 - 8 - -,-1 1 "1 J 1 1 1 I 1 )1 1 1 Figure 2.Susitna River drainage basin fish species by study zone. I SUSITNA RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN I •Fish Species Present Lower River:(20)Arctic grayling,Arctic lamprey,Bering cisco,burbol,chinook salmon,chum salmon,coho salmon,Dolly Varden,eulachon, humpback whitefish,lake 'rout,longnose suckar,northern pike, pink salmon,rainbow trout,round whllefish,slimy sculpin, sockeye salmon,lhreesplne stickleback,and nlnespine siickiBback. Middle River:(16)Arcllc grayling,Arctic lamprey,burbot,chinook salmon,chum salmon,coho salmon,Dolly Varden,humpback Whitefish,lake troul,long nose sucker,pink salmon,rainbow trout,round whileflsh,slimy sculpin,sockeye salmon,and Ihreesplne stickleback. Impoundment Zone:(9)Arclic grayling,burbot,Dolly Varden,humpback whitefish,lake trout,long nose sucker,round whitetlsh,slimy sculpin,and chinook salmon. 1.0 it occurs.Table 2 is useful for converting between water weeks and calendar days.Stream temperatures have been simulated using average weekly hydrologic and meteorologic data.Temperature predictions.therefore,represent the 24-hour average stream temperature which would be expected to occur on the av- erage day of the week.Winter simulations cover weeks 49 through 30 of the following water year;summer simulations cover weeks 31 through 52. With-project stream temperature simulations require the flow and tempera- ture of reservoir releases as input.Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture mod- els the reservoir(s)operation to determine release flow and temperatures,and transmits the results to AEIDC.These results include daily flows and associ- ated temperatures from powerhouse,cone valve and spillway releases.The dai- ly results are processed to obtain single mean weekly flows and temperatures which incorporate releases from the three outflow structures.These results are then used as upstream boundary conditions for the SNTEMP model. YEARS SELECTED FOR SIMULATION Temperature simulations under the Case C flow regime were previously run for a number of meteorologic conditions in order to bracket the expected range of resultant river temperatures (AEIDe 1984b).Preliminary temperature simu- lations under Case E-VI flow requirements were run using summer 1981.summer 1982 and winter 1981-82 conditions.Differences in simulated temperatures be- tween the Cases C and E-VI runs were considered slight enough not to warrant additional simulations (Harza-Ebasco 1985).It is assumed that these relative differences would apply regardless of climatic conditions. 33RD3-008 -10 -- -Tabll~2.Water ~eks for water year n. F"" WEEK WEE<. NUMBJffi FRCM 10 NUMBER FRCM 10--- Day!Mmth/Year Day /funth/Year Day h'bnth/Year Day!Mmth/Year --1 01 (kt n-l 07 (kt n-l 27 01 Apr n 07 Apr n 2 08 Oct n-l 14 Oct n-l 28 08 Apr n 14 Apr n 3 15 (kt n-l 21 (kt n-l 29 15 Apr n 21 Apr n 4 22 Oct n-l 28 Oct n-l 30 22 Apr n 28 Apr n-5 29 (kt n-l 04 lbv n-l 31 29 Apr 05 May nn 6 05 Nov n-l 11 Nov n-l 32 06 May n 12 May n 7 12 lbv n-l 18 lbv n-l 33 13 May n 19 May n 8 19 Nov n-l 25 Nov n-l 34 20 May n 26 Hay n 9 26 lbv n-l 02 Dec n-l 35 27 May n 02 Jtm.n 10 03 Dec n-l 09 Dec n-l 36 03 Jlm n 09 Jtm.n 11 10 Dec n-l 16 lee n-l 37 10 Jlm n 16 Jlm n 12 17 Dec n-l 23 Dec n-l 38 17 Jlm n 23 Jtm n 13 24 lee n-l 30 Dec n-l 39 24 Jtm n 30 Jtm n 14 31 Dec n-l 06 Jan n 40 01 Jul n 07 Jul n 15 07 Jan n 13 Jan n 41 08 Jul n 14 Jul n 16 14 Jan n 20 Jan n 42 15 Jul n 21 Jul n 17 21 Jan n 27 Jan n 43 22 Jul n 28 Jul n ~18 28 Jan n 03 Feb n 44 29 Jul n 04 Aug n 19 04 Feb n 10 Feb n 45 05 Aug n 11 Aug n 20 11 Feb n 17 Feb n 46 12 Aug n 18 Aug n 21 18 Feb n 24 Feb n 47 19 Aug n 25 Aug n-22 25 Feb 03 Mar 48 26 Aug 01 Sepnnn n 23 04 Mar n 10 Mar n 29 02 Sep n 08 Sep n 24 11 Mar n 17 Mar n 50 09 Sep n 15 Sep n ~25 18 Mar n 24 Mar n 51 16 Sep n 22 Sep n 26 25 Mar n 31 Mar n 52 23 Sep n 30 Sep n .- 33RCl/00&l-1 -11- - - - ...... INSTREAM FISHERY RESOURCE ANALYSIS The approach used in this study to determine the effects of altered water temperatures on instream fishery resources involved the development of temper- ature tolerance criteria for salmon.Criteria permit judgement of the nature of effects by E!xamining the degree of departure from either preferred or tol- erated environmental conditions.We prepared Susitna-specific thermal crite- ria through literature review as well as examination of Susitna field data and laboratory investigations conducted by the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (Wangaard and Burger 1983).These criteria included temperature ranges be- lieve.d to be capable of supporting adult spawning migrations,spawning, incubation,rearing,and smolt migrations (table 3).A detailed description of thermal relations and terminology as well as the methods used to develop tempe~rature cri.teria were presented in AEIDC (1984b). At least 20 species of fish are known to inhabit the Susitna drainage,16 of which have been captured in the Susitna River between Devil Canyon and Tal- keetna (table 4).Six of these are anadromous and 10 are resident species • Since the major group of species inhabiting the Susitna basin are salmonids, the emphasis of field investigations as well as the focus of concern regarding the E~ffects of the Susitna hydroelectric proj ect have been on the salmonid re- sources.Detailed descriptions of the fish resources in the Susitna basin are available in JBarrett,Thompson,and Wick (1984,1985)and Schmidt et al. (1984a,1984b)and were summarized in WCC and Entrix (1985)and AEIDC (1984b). Temperature regimes in the Devil Canyon-to-Talkeetna reach are evaluated with respect to the tolerance ranges identified for the various fish life stages considered.In order to facilitate this evaluation,temperature toler- ances are graphically presented over a I-year time frame by fish life stage for the five species of Pacific salmon.The figures developed for the Pacific 33RD3-008 -12 - Table 3.Salmon temperature tolerance criteria for Susitna River drainage. TEMPERATURE RANGE (C) - SPECIES Chum Sockeye Pink " Chinook Coho LIFE PHASE Adult Migration Spawning 1 Incubation Rearing Smolt Migration Adult Migration Spawning 1 Incubation Rearing Smolt Migration Adult Migration Spawning 1 Incubation Smolt Migration Adult-Migration Spawning 1 Incubation Rearing Smolt Migration Adult Migration Spawning 1 Incubation Rearing Smolt Migration TOLERANCE 1.5-18.0 1.0-14.0 0-12.0 1.5-16.0 3.0-13.0 2.5-16.0 4.0-14.0 0-14.0 2.0-16.0 4.0-18.0 5.0-18.0 7.0-18.0 0-13.0 4.0-13.0 2.0-16.0 5.0-14.0 0-16.0 2.0-16.0 4.0-16.0 2.0-18.0 2.0-17.0 0-14.0 2.0-18.0 2.0-16.0 PREFERRED 6.0-13.0 6.0-13.0 2.0-8.0 5.0-15.0 5.0-12.0 6.0-12.0 6.0-12.0 4.5-8.0 7.0-14.0 5.0-12.0 7.0-13.0 8.0-13.0 4.0-10.0 5.0-12.0 7.0-13.0 7.0-12.0 4.0-12.0 7.0-14.0 7.0-14.0 6.0-11.0 6.0-13.0 4.0-10.0 7.0-15.0 6.0-12.0 -'1 1Emb ryo incubation or development rate increases as temperature rises. Accumulated temperature units or days to emergence should be determined for each species for incubation. 33RC1/008e/1 -13 - ,..... Table 4.List of fish species found to date in the Susitna River between RM 100 and Devil Canyon. ..... I ..... I I I Arctic lamprey Arctic grayling Bering cisco Round whitefish Humpback whitefish Rainbow trout Dolly Varden Pink (humpback)salmon Sockeye (red)salmon Chinook (king)salmon Coho (silver)salmon Chum (dog)salmon Longnose suckel~ Threespine sti(~kleback Burbot Slimy sculpin 33RD3-008 Lampetra japonica (Martens) Thymallus arcticus (Pallas) Coregonus laurettae Bean Prosopium cylindraceum (Pallas) Coregonus pidschian (Gmelin) Salmo gairdneri Richardson Salvelinus malma (Walbaum) Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum) Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum) Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum) Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum) Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum) Catostomus catostomus (Forster) Gasterosteus aculeatus Linnaeus Lota Iota (Linnaeus) Cottus cognatus Richardson -14 - salmon are then overlayed with the temperature profiles from RM 100, 130,and 150 for the period May 1981 through April 1982 (See Appendices A-D).In cases where the tolerance range was not fully determined (resident species)existing life history knowledge was compared to predicted with-project temperatures. Because information on resident fish is incomplete,assessment of with-project effects on them is less rigorous. Only in cases where the simulated temperature regimes fall outside the life phase temperature tolerances is an obvious adverse impact expected.In cases where project conditions do not exceed tolerances but are substantially different from natural,a discussion of the likely effects of this situation is presented. I!"!lI :1 I 33RD3-00S -15 - .- ..... - ..... RESULTS AND DISCUSSION PROJECT EFFECTS ON INSTREAM TEMPERATURE Results from temperature simulations under Case C flow requirements and an "Jlnf1ow matching"operating rule have been previously discussed in AEIDC 1984b)•Simulations made since that report include Case C "warmest water" releaLses,Case E-VI "inflow matching"and Case E-VI "warmest water"scenarios. Results from these simulations are discussed here through three sets of com- parisons: 1.Case C "inflow matching"compared to Case C "warmest water"; ~,2.Case C "inflow matching"compared to Case E-VI "inflow matching"; .- 3.Case C "warmest water"compared to Case E-VI "warmest water". TemperatUlre chronology graphs for summers 1981 and 1982 for both the Watana 2001 and the Watana/Devi1 Canyon 2002 configurations at three river locations (RM 150,130,and 100)are provided in Appendix A.Tabular results for RM 130 arE~provided for all scenarios in table 5.Mean summer tempera- tures (water w,eeks 31 through 52)are provided for all these cases as well as for natural simulations in table 6.Mean simulated winter temperatures (water weeks 5 through 30)are given in table 7.A discussion of the results at RM 130 follows • 33RD3-008 -16 - Table 5.Comparison of Water Temperatures (C)at RM 130 (LRX 33)for Case C and Case E-VI. Water Week 1981 Case 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Watana 2001 E-VI 3.3 4.1 4.7 6.0 7.4 7.6 9.2 10.9 9.1 8.6 8.3 9.6 10.6 10.2 9.5 7.9 7.8 9.0 9.0 7.9 8.3 6.1 IF Match Watana 2001 C 3.9 4.4 4.8 6.0 7.3 7.1 9.0 10.7 8.6 8.5 8.2 9.8 10.7 10.3 9.1 8.0 7.8 9.0 9.0 7.9 8.1 6.0 IF Match Watana 2001 E-VI 3.0 4.0 4.6 5.9 7.3 7.6 9.3 10.8 10.0 9.8 9.0 9.8 10.6 10.4 10.5 8.8 8.3 8.9 9.5 8.9 8.5 6.7 Warmest W, i-' '"-J Watana 2001 C 3.1 4.1 4.6 5.7 7.1 6.9 8.8 10.6 9.3 9.6 8.8 9.8 10.8 10.4 9.0 8.5 8.5 8.9 9.7 9.0 8.6 6.8.'Warmest W D.C.2002 E-VI 2.8 3.8 4.7 5.2 5.9 5.9 6.8 7.5 7.4 7.3 5.8 4.9 6.7 7.7 8.0 7.7 7.5 8.0 8.5 8.4 8.5 7.5 IF Match D.C.2002 C 3.0 4.0 4.7 5.4 6.0 6.5 8.0 8.7 7.8 7.6 6.7 5.1 6.0 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.5 7.9 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.6 IF Match D.C.2002 E-VI 3.3 4.1 4.8 5.3 5.8 5.7 6.7 7.4 7.8 7.9 5.8 4.9 6.7 7.6 7.9 7.9 8.0 8.2 8.7 8.6 8.6 7.5 Warmest W D.C.2002 C 2.7 3.7 4.5 5.1 5.8 5.8 7.0 8.1 8.8 9.8 7.9 5.3 6.1 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.9 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 7.7 Warmest W ~:===========~===================:=========~======~=============================================================--==================~============= Natural 5.1 7.5 8.2 8.1 9.4 8.8 11.5 12.3 9.1 9.0 9.4 9.9 10.3 10.0 10.0 7.6 8.1 10.1 7.9 7.3 6.5 2.2 _33RCJ,J008a/1 k .•~••]"••~:;I .1 I 1 ))I I I 1 J -I I -1 1 1 --) Table 5 (contI d).Comparison of Water Temperatures (C)at RM 130 (LRX 33)for Case C and Case E-VI. 33RC1/008a/2 Table 5 (cont'd).Comparison of Water Temperatures (C)at RM 130 (LRX 33)for Case C and Case E-VI. Water Week 1981-1982 Case 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Watana 2001 E-VI 1.7 1.4 2.5 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.9 4.3 IF Match Watana 2001 C .7 .2 3.0 1.9 2.2 2.8 4.1 4.6 IF Match Watana 2001 E-VI 2.4 2.1 3.0 1.8 1.9 2.6 3.8 4.2 Warmest W t-'Watana 2001 C 1.4 1.1 2.5 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.7 4.2 \0 Warmest W D.C.2002 E-VI 2.0 1.9 2.7 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.8 4.2 IF Match D.C.2002 C 2.1 1.9 2.5 1.9 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.2 IF Match D.C.2002 E-VI 2.1 2.0 2.8 2.2 2.5 3.1 4.0 4.3 Warmest W D.C.2002 C 2.1 2.1 2.8 2.3 2.5 3.1 3.9 4.2 Warmest W ==~==~===========================================================~===========================================~======================~==~======~ Natural 33RC1!008a!3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.6 5.8 !.1 J 1 1 J 1 .-1 -I J 1 1 J )····-1 1 I 1 Table 5 (cont'd).Comparison of Water Temperatures (C)at RM 130 (LRX 33)for Case C and Case E-VI. Water Week 1982 Case 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Watana 2002 E-VI 4.2 3.7 4.1 4.2 5.0 5.9 6.6 7.3 8.6 8.8 9.7 10.5 9.4 10.0 10.3 10.2 10.6 9.3 8.7 8.2 6.9 6.1 IF Match Watana 2001 C 4.3 3.6 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.8 6.3 7.3 8.5 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.2 9.7 10.0 9.9 10.5 9.0 8.9 8.5 7.6 7.2 IF Match Watana 2001 E-VI 3.9 3.4 3.9 4.2 5.4 6.2 7.1 7.7 9.2 9.7 10.4 11.0 10.1 11.0 11.8 11.4 11.7 11.2 9.5 8.7 7.4 6.7 Warmest W I N Watana 2001 C 4.0 3.4 3.9 4.0 5.0 5.7 6.3 7.3 9.5 10.5 10.4 10.4 9.7 10.5 11.7 12.0 12.4 11.5 10.1 9.0 7.9 7.50 1 Warmest W D.C.2002 E-VI 4.2 4.1 4.6 4.7 5.2 5.2 5.6 6.8 7.6 7.8 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.9 8.2 8.2 8.5 8.2 8.0 7.9 7.7 7.9 IF Match D.C.2002 C 4.2 4.2 4.6 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.7 6.8 7.8 8.5 10.2 6.9 5.6 6.2 7.4 8.3 9.0 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.3 8.0 IF Match D.C.2002 E-VI 4.3 4.1 4.6 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.6 6.7 7.6 7.7 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.9 8.1 8.1 8.4 8.4 8.7 8.2 .7.7 7.8 ' Warmest W D.C.2002 C 4.2 4.0 4.5 4.7 5.2 5.2 5.5 6.5 7.4 8.3 9.3 7.0 5.5 6.1 7.7 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.8 8.5 8.4 Warmest W =~==============================~======;=========~============================================================================================= Natural 5.5 4.7 6.7 6.6 8.4 8.9 8.0 9.6 ~1.8 10.6 11.1 11.2 10.0 11.0 11.2 11.0 11.0 9.5 8.0 6.7 6.6 4.4 33RC1!008a!4 Table 6.Mean summer water temperatures (C)for water weeks 31-52 at RM 130 for 1981 and 1982. N Watana 2001 Devil Canyon 2002 A T U Inflow Warmest Inflow Warmest R Match Water Match Water A L C E-VI C E-VI C E-VI C E-VI Summer '81 8.6 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.3 6.8 6.7 7.0 6.8 Summer '82 8.8 7.7 7.7 8.3 8.3 7.0 6.6 6.9 6.7 - - 33RCl/008b/l -21 - ,.... Table 7.Mean winter water temperatures (C)for water weeks 5-30 at RM 130 for 1981-82. l- I Natural Watana 2001 Devil Canyon 2002 Inflow Warmest Inflow Warmest Match Water Match Water C E-VI C E-VI C E-VI C E-VI 1.5 1.5 1.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.2 - - 1S '1 .1mu at10ns assume no .(weeks 25-30)may not temperatures would be 33RC1!008c!1 ice cover.Thus,warming that occurs in late winter be realistic.In this case,simulated water unnaturally high. -22 - SUMMER Case C warmest water compared to Case C inflow matching Operating the reservoir under the "warmest water"release operating rule results in warmer downriver temperatures in the summer as well as during the winter for either dam configuration.Mean summer temperatures at RM 130 were 0.2 and 0.6 C warmer (1981 and 1982 respectively)under warmest water opera-~ tion for the Watana 2001 scenario.Mean summer river temperatures were less different (0.2 and 0.1 C warmer,1981 and 1982 respectively)under the Devil Canyon 2002 scheme.Most often,the warmest water rule resulted in slightly cooler temperatures early in the summer (May-June)and slightly warmer temper- atures later in the season (July-September). Case E-VI inflow matching compared to Case C inflow matching Under the Watana 2001 scenario,river temperatures at RM 130 are virtual- ly identical for both the Case C and Case E-VI flow requirements.With the addition of the Devil Canyon reservoir,E-VI operating temperatures are slightly cooler (0.1 and 0.4 C for 1981 and 1982).Most notable is the lower peak temperatures early in the summer. Case E-VI warmest water compared to Case C warmest water Once again,under th~Watana 2001 scheme,water temperatures at RM 130 are virtually identical for both Cases C and E-VI flow requirements.The addition of the Devil Canyon reservoir results in slightly cooler mean summer temperatures under E-VI than under Case C (0.2 C cooler for both 1981 and 1982).There is a notable difference,however,in the timing of these - - 33RD3-008 -23 - temperatures.E-VI temperatures are cooler than Case C temperatures early in the summer (May-June),but warmer during the latter part of the season. WINTER Case C warmest water compared to Case C inflow matching There is no clear pattern here.Under the Watana configuration,overall winter temperatures are slightly cooler (1.3 versus 1.5 C)with "warmest wa- ter"than with "inflow matching".There is no consistency,however,from week-to-week,as the "inflow matching"case is sometimes warmer,sometimes cooler.Addition of the Devil Canyon reservoir results in slightly warmer river temperatures under "warmest water"than under "inflow matching",both on a seasonal basis (2.3 versus 2.1 C)and consistently week~to-week. Case E-VI inflow matching compared to Case C inflow matching Under the Watana 2001 load,mean winter temperatures are the same (1.5 C) for both flow requirements.The differences between individual weeks,how- ever!.are as h:lgh as 1.2 C.Under the Devil Canyon 2002 load,Case E-VI oper- ations result in slightly cooler winter temperatures throughout the winter, witp seasonal means of 2.0 and 2.1 C. Case E-VI warmlest water compared to Case C warmest water Under the Watana configuration,E~VI river temperatures are consistently warmer than Calse C,with winter means of 2.1 and 1.3 C respectively.Under the two dam configuration,the reverse occurs with E-VI temperatures consis- tently a bit cooler (winter mean of 2.2 versus 2.3 C). 33RD3-00S'-24 - - """"I ..... I EFFECTS OF PROJECT-RELATED TEMPERATURES ON FISH RESOURCES INTRODUCTION In this section,natural and with-project temperature regimes in the Devil Canyon-to-Talkeetna reach are evaluated with respect to the salmon life stage temperature tolerances previously established (see AEIDC 1984b).In - - - - order to evaluate project effects,the established temperature tolerance cri- teria have been graphically illustrated covering a one-year time frame (1981-82)for E~ach of the five species.In cases where life phases overlap, that life phas1e most sensitive to temperature was chosen when preparing the tolerance critE~ria.The criteria,then,establish the narrowest temperature tolerance windcM for evaluation. These figures (Append{ces B-D)are then compared,using graphic overlays, with the weekly natural and with-project temperature profiles at river miles 100,130,and 150.Three cases are examined:1)natural versus Case C "in- .. flow matching"and "warmest water"for both one and two dams (Appendix B);2) natural versus Case C "inflow matching"and Case E-VI "inflow matching"(Ap- pendix C);and 3)natural versus Case C "warmest water"and Case E-VI "warmest water"(Appendix D).For each of the three groups,Watana-only and the - - two-dam scenarios are presented. Only in c:ases where the simulated temperature regimes fall outside the life phase temperature tolerances is an adverse impact established.It should be noted that this occasionally happens for natural scenarios.For example, temperatures from late September through the winter fall below the tolerance level established for chinook,sockeye,and coho salmon (Appendix B).Outmi- gration for these species continues into October and is the life phase 33RD3-008 -25 - activity most sensitive to temperature at this time of year.The lower tem- perature tolerances for outmigrating chinook juveniles is therefore set at 4 C for this period even though it is past their peak outmigration and very few fish would still be migrating.The winter lower tolerance level is set at 2 C for chinook,coho,and sockeye.This represents the more sensitive rearing life phase activity.Natural temperatures are below this in winter;however, it should be noted that juvenile salmon have been found rearing in warmer upwelling-influenced areas and not in the 0 C mainstem waters. CASE C WARMEST WATER COMPARED TO CASE C INFLOW MATCHING Watana Only Case C "warmest water"versus "inflow matching"scenarios are included to show the effects of 1)attempts to pass as warm a volume of water as possible to keep the ice front farthest downriver,and 2)attempts to match the natural reservoir inflow temperature regime,respectively.Case C "warmest water"is only slightly warmer in the summer and slightly cooler in the winter than Case C "inflow matching." For Watana only.both Case C "inflow matching"and "warmest water"tem- peratures are slightly cooler early in the summer and warmer in the fall and winter than under natural conditions.The similarities between the two Case C temperature scenarios are so close as to render delineation of their tempera- ture effects on fish impractical.From these temperature simulations,there is no evidence of with-proj ect temperatures falling outside the tolerance zones (Appendix B). - - 33RD3-008 -26 - - .... Devil Canyon With both dams operating,Case C "warmest water"is slightly warmer than "inflow matching"year-round.Both cases are considerably cooler than natural over the summer and are warmer than natural in the fall and winter.As with Watana alone,similarities in these two cases make delineation between them of temperature effects on fish impractical. In both Case C scenarios,there is a potential for pink and chinook salmon inmigration problems upstream of RM 130 in late June to mid-July as temperatures fa.ll below the tolerance level for this life phase (Appendix B). This is,however,mainly a concern for pink salmon because the potential block could preclude access to more habitat,would occur neater the peak of inmigra- tion,and the period of exposure to temperatures below tolerance levels would be of longer duration.Inmigration,we believe,would be delayed but would ultimately occur 5 to 15 oays later.This may result in a shorter period between the time pink salmon occupy spawning grounds and the occurrence of actual spawning.Taken by itself,a delay in spawning of this duration might be suff~cient to noticeably depress reproductive success by ultimately delay- ing fry emergence.It is important to note that under the worst case scenari- os,model results indicate that the temperature block would disappear slightly before peak irumigration occurred.Thus,the majority of fish would continue to reach their natal areas in synchrony with endogenous biological clocks. Temperatures upstream of RM 130 in July also fall outside pink and chinook salmon spawning tolerance zones (Appendix B).This only occurs for about a week and should pose no long-term problems to spawning.It also should be noted that neither pink nor chinook salmon presently use this habitat for spawning,and that this could be more of a future mitigation constraint rather than a present impact concern. 33RD3-008 -27 - As described in AEIDC (l984b).some reduction of juvenile growth would occur due to cooler summer temperatures.even though the Case C "warmest wa- ter"and "inflow matching"temperature scenarios are within·the established range of salmon tolerance.Although unquantifiable.effects on rearing chi- nook salmon should be the most severe as they are the most numerous in habi- tats directly under mainstem temperature influence.Growth modeling indicates that,depending on climate and the temperature of reservoir-released waters, growth rates of juveniles rearing in affected mainstem areas (above RM 130) could be reduced by 8 to 29%(AEIDC 1984).These growth-reduction rate esti- mates include the increased growth from the warmer fall temperatures.They are also based in part on the assumption that affected juvenile fish would feed to satiation.Since this probably does not happen in the wild,these estimates could be viewed as worst case scenarios.Also,a bettermainstem incubating and rearing habitat could exist in the open water zone above the ice front under the two-dam scenarios due to the warmer-than-natural mainstem water temperatures provided that other suitable habitat parameters existed. In both of these life phases,due to the similarities between Case C "inflow matching"and "warmest water",the same impacts and concerns described for Case C inflow matching in AEIDC (l984b)apply directly to the Case C "warmest water". CASE E-VI INFLOW MATCHING COMPARED TO CASE C INFLOW MATCHING Watana Only Predicted weekly water temperatures for Case C and E-VI for Watana only are almost identical (Appendix C).We believe,therefore,that the same im- pacts described in the previous section and in AEIDC (l984b)for Case C "in- flow matching"would apply to Case E-VI. 33RD3-008 -28 - Devil Canyon Again,the weekly water temperatures for Case E-VI are nearly the same as for Case C (Appendix C).The impacts of Case E-VI would be essentially the same as previoUisly described (AEIDC 1984b). CASE E-VI WARMEST WATER COMPARED TO CASE C WARMEST WATER Predicted river temperatures for the open water season for these two Watana Onlj7 .- I -cases are almost identical (Appendix D).Impact statements presented for - Case C during the summer period in AEIDC (1984b)would also apply to Case E-VI.During winter,however,water temperatures are warmer for Case E-VI than Case C.Because of these warmer temperatures,an improved rearing and incubating habitat would exist above RM 130·during the Case E-VI "warmest water"operation. Devil Canj70n Predicted summer river temperatures for the two cases are almost identi- cal,although an increase in water temperature occurs in early July for Case C (Appendix D).The effects described in AEIDC (1984b)for Case C during summer would also apply to E-VI.In converse to that described above for the Watana- only scenario,during winter both cases are almost identical with Case C being slightly warmer.We believe no notable effects can be attributed to Case E-VI other than previously defined for Case C in AEIDC (1984b). 33RD3-008 -29 - - - -, CONCLUSIONS Because of the similarity between the Case E-VI and Case C temperature simulations for 1981-82,it is very difficult to attribute the very slight temperature differences between the E-VI and C scenarios to a definitive ef- feet on fish.The expected temperature effects of the Case C scenario have been previously described in ABIDC (1984b).The same concerns expressed there are held for Case E-VI.Based on existing data,model runs,thermal tolerance criteria,life history information,and professional judgement,no direct mortaiity on fish is anticipated to occur from with-project temperatures. Based on the temperature tolerance criteria for salmon,the cooler summer temperatures for the two-dam scenarios could cause some delay in pink and chinook salmon inmigration and spawning above RM 130.Some reduction of juve- nile growth may occur due to cooler summer tempE!ratures,even though the simu- lated temperatures are within the established range for tolerance.Outmi- grants from tributaries and sloughs upstream of RM 130 in late May and early June would encounter considerably colder-than-natural mainstem waters during Devil Canyon operation.During cold years,outmigrating salmon could avoid the mainstem and delay outmigration until temperatures warm in late June. ,Mainstem winte.r water temperatures,which under natural conditions may be limiting to salmon overwintering and incubation,could be improved from the warmer project operation waters.This is especially true of the two-dam sce- narios. 33RD3-008 -30 - REFERENCES Acres American,Inc.1983.Application for license for major project, Susitna Hydroelectric Project,before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.Vol.SA.Exhibit E.Chaps.1 and 2.Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.1 vol. Acres American.Inc.1983.Final application for license for major project, Susitna Hydroelectric Project,before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.accepted by FERC July 27.1983.Vol.SA.Exhibit E. Chaps.1 and 2.Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydroelectric Project. 1 vol. AEIDC.See.Alaska.Univ.,Arctic Environmental Information &Data Center. Alaska.Univ.J'Arctic Environmental Information &Data Center.1984a. Examination of Susitna River discharge and temperature changes due to the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Final report.Anchorage.AK. Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.APA Document 861.·31 pp. - Alaska.Univ ••Arctic Environmental Information &Data flow and temperature modeling in the Susitna report.Anchorage.AK.Alaska Power Authority. Project.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Document 862.60 pp.and appendices. Center.1983.Stream Basin.Alaska.Final Susitna Hydroelectric Joint Venture.APA Alaska.Univ."Arctic Environmental Information &Data Center.1984b. Assessment of the effects of the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project on instream temperature and fishery resources in the Watana to Talkeetna reach.Final report.Vol.1.Main text.Vol.2.Appendices A-H. Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture. Alaska.Univ.,Arctic Environmental Information &Data Center.1984c. Assessment of the effects of the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project. on instream temperature and fishery resources in the Watana to Talkeetna reach.Final report.Anchorage.AK.Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydroelectric Proj ect.Report for Harza-·Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture. 2 vol.in 1 (looseleaf). Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture. requirements.Final report. Hydroelectric Project.55 pp. 1984.Evaluation of alternative flow Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.1985. Vol.1.Main report.Final Report. Hydroelectric Project.1 vol. Case E-VI alternative flow regime. Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Theurer.F.,K.Voos,and W.Miller.1983.Instream water temperature model. Draft report.Instream Flow and Aquatic Systems Group,u.S.Fish & Wildlife Service.Fort Collins.CO.Instream Flow Information Paper No.16.263 pp. 33RD3-008 -31 - Wangaard,D.B.,and C.V.Burger.1983.Effects of various water temperature regimes on the egg and alevin incubation of Susitna River chum and sockeye salmon.Final report.National Fishery Research Center,U.s. Fish &Wildlife Service,Anchorage,AK.43 pp. WCC and Entri~.See,Woodward-Clyde Consultants,and Entrix,Inc. Woodward~Clyde Consultants,and Entrix,Inc.1985.Fish resources and habitats in the middle Susitna River.Draft final report.Anchorage, AK.Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Instream Flow Relationships Report Series.Technical Report 1.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.159 pp. 33RD3-008 -32 - APPENDICES A.Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations comparing natural and with-project conditions. Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Natural,Case C "warmest water,"and Case C "inflow matching" Natural,Case C "inflow matching,"and Case E-VI "inflow match- ing" Natural,Case C "warmest water,"and Case E-VI "warmest water" ,.... B. ...., C. D. .... .... - Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage tempera.ture tolerance criteria for natural,Case C "warmest water,"and Case C "inflow matching" Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperalture tolerance criteria for natural,Case C "inflow matching,"and Case E-VI "inflow matching" Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperature tolerance criteria for natural,Case C "warmest water,"and Case E-VI "warmest water" 33RD3-008 -33 - 1 - ..... 33RD3-008 APPENDIX A Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations comparing natural and with-project conditions - - APPENDIX A~PART 1 \~ Natural,Case C "Warmest water,"and Ca.se C "inflow matching" Scenario Page---- 1981 Watana 2001,RM 150 Al,....Watana 2001,RM 130 A2 Watana 2001,RM 100 A3 1982 Watana 2001,RM 150 A4 Watana 2001,RM 130 AS Watana 2001,RM 100 A6-1981 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 A7 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 A8 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 A9 I"'"" 1982 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 A10 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 All Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 A12 ,..., """ 33RD3-008 J 1 I -]1 c~1 1 I t c-l ....] SEP OCT <>WAT'01 C w.w. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 150 14 ~-----:----:..:..::~--- ::I ~I 11 10 U 9 CD 8"-:J ~...... f-'0 7"- CD 0-6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 .. MAY JUN JUL AUG NAT +WAT'01 C I.F.M. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 130 14 13 12 11 10 u 9 CD 8... :J:>.... N 0 7... a> 0.6E a> l-S 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . MAY JUN JUL AUG NAT +WAT'01 C I.F.M. SEP OCT ¢WAT'01 C W.W. _._..~«_1 I .1 'J J .1 ·1 1 1 ·1 I )--1 ] SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 100 14 13 12 11 10 (J 9 a>8L. :J >..... lJ,)0 7L. a> 0.6E a>...-5 4 3 2 1 0 . MAY JUN JUL AUG --NAT +WAT'01 C I.F'.M. SEP OCT <>WAT'01 C W.W. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 150 14 13 12 11 10 U 9 CD 8"-:s >.... ~0 7"-CD Q.6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 . ...•... .... MAY JUN JUL ,--Nat +Wat'01 C 16F.M. AUG SEP <>.Wat'01 W.W. OCT ,].J ..]I J ~,~])I -D J 1 -1 1 c'-~l '1 ..-1 1--')~-1-]I I i SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 130 14 13 12 11 10 0 9 CD 8L- ~ >~ VI 0 7L- CD 0.6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 .. . MAY JUN JUL -Nat +Wat'01 C I.F.M. AUG SEP o Wat'01 W.W. OCT SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 100 14 13 12 11 I . 10 U 9 cp 8L- :::J >.... 0\0 7L- CDa.6E CD I-5 4 3 2 1 0 ,. . . ,..,... MAY JUN JUL --Nat +Wat'01 C I.F.M. AUG SEP (>Wat'01 W.W. OCT ~,J .~....~.] 1 -1 1 J -1 J ]-1 1 ~-1 -1 --1 --1 T OCTSEPAUGJUL RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 150 SUSITNA 14 13 12 1 1 10 ()9 Q)8'-:J >.... "tJ 7L.. Q) 0-6E Q) l-S 4 3 2 1 0 . . . MAY JUN -NAT +D.C.'02 C I.F.M.<>D.C.'02 C W.W. RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 130 SUSITNA 14 13 12 11 10 0 9 ID 8L- :::J :>.... 00 0 7L- ID Q.6E ID l-S 4 3 2 1 0 ... . . . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT --NAT +D.C.'O 2 C I.F.M •<>D.C.'02 C W.W. )1 I J 1 1 111 -,1 1 ~1 ~--l ] SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 100 ¢D.C.'02 C W.W. 14 13 12 1 1 10 (,)9 Q)8L. :J >~ '"0 7L. Q) Q.6E CDr-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . MAY JUN JUL --NAT +D.C.'02 C I.F.M. AUG SEP OCT RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 150 SUSITNA 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 CD 8"-::J>..........0 70"-CDa.6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 . . ,..,., MAY JUN -Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F~Me JUL AUG SEP <>D.C.'02 C WeW. OCT J J ,)J J -~]--1 --,'1 1 -1 -]J "-'1 'J J --I -',i 1 SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 130 OCTSEP ¢D.C.'02 C W.W. AUGJUL 14 13 12 11 10' (,)9 CD 8L. :J.... 0 7L.>CDr-' r-'Q.6E CD J--5 4 3 2 1 0 . . .. MAY JUN -Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F'.M. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 100 +D.C.'02 C I.F.M. 14 13 12 11 10 0 9 CD 8.... :J >+0-.....0 7N.... CDa.6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 '" Nat MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP <>D.C.'02 C W.W. OCT .:1 ....J e,l·~J]J ...1.,1 J ,I APPENDIX A.PART 2 Natural,Case C "inflow matching,1I and-Case E-VI "inflow matching ll Scenario Page-1981 Watana 2001,RM 150 A13 Watana 2001,RM 130 A14 Watana 2001,RM 100 A15 1982 Watana 2001,RM 150 A16 Watana 2001,RM 130 A17 .'!SM.Watana 2001,RM 100 A18 1981 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 A19 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 A20 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 A21 1982 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 A22 .-Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 A23, Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 A24 .... i , - .-i 33RD3-008 1 1 1 1 '1 J -I 1 J -1 11 1 SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 150 OCTSEP <>Wat'01 E-VI I.F.M. AUG 14 13 12 1 1 10 ()9 Q)8... ::J :t>-o+- I-'0 7w... Q) Q.6E Q) I-5 4 3 2 1 O. MAY JUN JUL -Not +Wot'01 C t.F.M. RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 130 OJ I I I Iii I I i I II I I I Iii I i I I , I I SUSITNA 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 Q)8\.. :J >.... I-'0 7.po \.. Q) a.6E Q) I--5 4 3 2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Not +Wat'01 C /.F.M.<>Wot'01 E-VI I.FeM. J J I ._J .",.,1 I e.1 I 1 1 ))1 1 ...)1 ]1 ~·l ...• SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 100 <>Wat l 01 E-VI I.F.M. 14 13 12 1 1 10 u 9 Q)8i... ::J :»-..... I-'()7Lni... Q) a.6E Q) I--5 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . .. MAY JUN JUL -Nat +Wat l 01 C I.F.M. AUG SEP OCT SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 150 14 13 12 11 10 u 9 Q)8'- :J >-I-'0 70\'-Q) 0-6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 a ,..,. . ..,. . ,..,. MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT -Nat +Wat-01 C I.F.M.¢Wat-01 E-VI I.F.M. ,-,"".I ,"I '].1 I ,]1 'c.])...e,,")"I .1 :_J_J e.c.'!'•.J~..J.,I J ):]I J ]•1 J I i SUSITNARIVER TEMPERATURES 1982RM 130 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 Q)8'-:::s :>.... ......0 7-....J '- Q) 0-6E Q) t-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . . . . . . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT --~l -Nat +Wot'01 C I.F.M.<>Wat'01 E-VI I.F.M. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 100 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 a>8L. :J :t>..po t-'0 7OJL. a> 0-SE a> I-5 4 3 2 1 0 ,. .,.. .. MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT -Not +Wat'01 C I.F.M.<>Wot'01 E-VI I.F.M. ..J ).·..·1 ]~,.o,)].1.1 '"0.1 =---",.)"",---._ I )_..]--,I ]-i --.--i -.)-J 1 -)J SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES '1981 RM 150 <>D.C.'02 E-VI I.F.M. 14 13 12 11 10 0 9 CD 8L- :J >t-.....0 7---'.aL- a> 0-6E a>.-r:;;. oJ 4 3 2 1 0 . . MAY JUN Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F.M. JUL AUG SEP OCT RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 130 o D.C.'02 E-VI I.F.M. SUSITNA 14 13 12 1 1 10 ()9 Q)8~ ::J>-NO 7o~ CD 0..6E CD.-5 4 3 2 1 0 .. . ...• MAY JUN Nat +D.C:02 C I.F.M. JUL AUG SEP OCT ",I I I 1 00 I o I I -J '-I -0 °lo 1 -j 1 11 1 RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 100 o D.C.'02 E-VI I.F.M. SUSITNA 14 13 12 11 10 c.>9 (I)8L. J ~-+-NO 7t-<... (I) Q.6E (I) l-S 4 3 2 1 0 .. MAY JUN Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F.M. JUL AUG SEP OCT SUSIOTNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 150 14 13 12 1 1 10 ()9 0>8t... J.... 0 7>t....NO> NO.6E 0> l-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . ...I .I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT .Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F.M. ] <>D.C.'02 E-VI I.F.M. .J),I )··1 ~-1 1 11 11 -11 .-I 1 »·1 .SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 130 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 Q)8~ :J tJ>-+-NO 7w~ Q) 0-6E Q).-"oj 4 3 2 1 0 . . .. MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F.M.<>D.C.'02 E-VI I.F.M. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 100 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 Q)8L. ::J>-+-NO 7+'L. Q) Q.6E Q) ~5 4 3 2 1 0 .,. . . . . . ... MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Nat +D.C.'02 C I.F.M'.&.I D.C.'02 E-VI I.F.M. I ,c,c ..",,),:1 .]:I J ",I J "I ]),] - - 33RD3-00B ~ i , - 1 c )J 1 J j J -,-----1 1 ]1 ---I SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 150 (>WAT'01 E-VI W.W. 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 a>8L- :J :t:-ot- N 0 7LnL- a> Q.6E a> I-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . . .. . . . MAY JUN JUL --NAT +WAT'01 C W.W. AUG SEP OCT RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 130 SUSITNA 14 13 12 11 10 (,)9 CD 8"-:Jp;-o+- N 0 70\"- CD 0-6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 . . . .. MAY JUN .JUL AUG SEP OCT -NAT +WAT'01 C W.W.o WAT'01 E-VI W.W. J -.1 J I ]I .1 -J ~-1 J J ]"1 J 1--]-)-J --1 i RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 100 SUSITNA 14 13 12 11 10 0 9 CD 8'-::l ~.... N 0 7"-J L.- CD 0-6E CD I-5 4 3 2 1 a . . . . . . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT -NAT +WAT'01 C W.W.¢WAT'01 E-VI W.W. SUSITNA RIVER'TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 150 14 13 12 11 10 (J 9 CD 8"- :J >.... t-.)0 700"-CD 0-6E CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . . .. . . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Nat +WAT'01 C W.W.<>WAT'01 E-VI W.W. .1 J I ._I "J ]1 J ..-11 1 _.))OJ -]]---J il SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 130 14 13 12 11 10 u 9 CD 8L- :J>"1- N 0 7\.0 L- CD 0..6E CD I--5 4 3 2 1 O. MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT -Nat +WAT'01 C W.W..<>WAT'01 E-VI W.W. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 100 14 13 12 11 10 0 9 CD 8L- :J>+- lJ,.)0 70L- CD 0-6E CD.....5 4 3 2 1 0 . . .. . ,. .. . ,..,.. . . . , , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Nat ~, +WAT'01 C WoW. ...J <>WAT'01 E-VI WoWo J .~l c-·1 c 1 II -]-1 1 ].-·11 -~)1 I .SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1981 RM 150 14 13 12 11 10 u 9 CD 8"-:J>.... w 0 7......"-CDa..6E CD.-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . . ... MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT -NAT +D.C.'02 C W.W.<>D.C'02 E-VI W.W. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATU RES 1981 RM 130 ¢D.C'02 E-VI W.W. 14 13 12 11 10 u 9 CD 8'-::s>....w 0 7N'- CD 0-SE CD to-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . . MAY JUN JUL NAT +D.C.'02 C W.W. AUG SEP OCT .,J .J I <"L.,j.) J 11 ]1 -~l-l 1 1 lJ --] SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES ....) Nat ct +D.C.'02 C w.w. I ,I ~D.C.'02 E-VI W.W. --I 1--1 J 11 J ..~1 1 -1 J'J j SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 130 14 13 12 11 10 ()9 CD 8L- :J :J>..... w 0 7lJlL- CDa.6E CD t-5 4 3 2 1 0 . . . . . . . . . .". . .. . . . . . . ,. . . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT -Nat +D.C.'02 C w.w.<>D.C.'02 E-VI W.W. SUSITNA RIVER TEMPERATURES 1982 RM 100 14 ,13 12 11 10 0 9 CD 8L. :J >-w 0 70\l- CD 0-SE CD I-5 4 3 2 1 0 ..,. .. .. ... . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Nat +D.C.'02 C w.w.<>D.C.'02 E-VI W.W. _J ,)J J ...J ..1-].~J 'I~J J ,)1 ""],,,,;1 .... ..... - .- .... 33RD3-008 APPENDIX B• Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life state temperature tolerance criteria for natural,Case C "warmest water," and Case C "inflow matching" Scenario Page----- 1981-1982 Watana 2001,RM 150 Five species B1-B5 Watana 2001,RM 130 Five species B6-B10 Watana 2001,RM 100 Five species B11-B15 1981-1982 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 Five species B16-B20 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 Five species B21-B25 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 Five species B26-B30 ]1 1 C)1 I 1 11 c-l --J CHUM SALMON J I _c ···-1 C-C~---i Adult lnmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigralion· • I I • • I I • ••• I I • Range • • Peak t-+- b;j,.... 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 ()11 II>10 L. :J 9 0+- 0 L.8 cua.7 Ecu 6 l-e', <oJ 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP -OCT NOV DEC Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water CHINOOK SALMON Peak Range .-. •• Tolerance Zone 18 -I-----========================~ 17 • 16 -1...------. 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 - 1 - _01 11--------------==::-~>~----~~~~~~~[:iL:::::::::..-lJ-I -..."...!I -2 'i iii iii I i I I ,i i·i i I I I I I t 1 iii iii iii i iii iii iii iii iii ii' u Q) "- :J-o "- Q) a. E Q> I- Adulllnmigralion •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation ~- Juvenile Rearing'•• I I Oulmlgralion'•I I • td N MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 --Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water I .J 1 J .]-1 J 1 ··_··1 .)···1 I ---,=0"i1 SOCKEYE SALMON Adult Inmigralion •I I • Spa\Vnin~•I I • Incubation r-. Juvenile Rearing I I 1 I Outmigralion •I I • 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1\Tolerance Zone ()11 Q)10 L-9::J+-b:l 0 BwL- a>7a.. E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 Range •• Peak t--t- MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching ¢Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water • r I • Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubalion r-- Juvenile Rearing Outmigration • I I • • I ,. PINK SALMON Range • • Peak ,---,- Tolerance Zone I;l:j -l'- (,) CD "- :l 0+-o "- CD Q. E CD I- 18 -I i 17 16 15 14 13 J I 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01''>'\Y C>.J I -1 -2 -l (iii I i I Iii iii Iii iii I I (iii iii iii i I I Iii iii I Iii i (Iii i , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR )J 1981-82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water ]e]I "~i."J ,~~,."I I 1 1 ~C].J---]1 J 1 COHO SALMON: 1 -, • I I. • I I • • I I. Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubalkn Juvenile Rearing I I I I Oulmjgralion· Range •• Peak t-t- ". Tolerance Zone ' b:l lJl u II) L- :J "t- O L- II) Q. E II) t- 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 \:'$\1#;:A.,+A A J'.lv:M '4 I 1 01 "),~c .........J I -1 -2 ,iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii I I I ---.----..I Iii iii i , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water CHUM SALMON Peak t----t- Range • • Tolerance Zone • I I • • I I • • I I,. ~ 18 1'--------:........==========================17 _'i 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o -1 -2 ~Iii iii iii iii J •iii'ii'iii ii'iii'i •,iii iii iii iii Iii i i .. u (I) ~ :l-o ~ (I) 0.. E (I).- Adult Jnmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Hearing OUlmigralion l:l:I 0\ MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water J ~1 1 1 -1 -I 1 J )J -1 j CHINOOK SALMON Adult Inmigrat!On.~•I:,·I Spawnmg •I I ~ Incubatior. Juvenile Rearing·I Outmigration·.I ~. Range •• Peak -t--t APR Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MARDEC 1 981 -82 RM 130 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 u 11 lD 10 L. 9O=l :J......,.... 0 8l- lD 70- E 6lD t-r;;;.... 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 •••,• I I ,••, I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching ¢Watana 200 1 Case C Warmest Water SOCKEYE SALMON Peak r---r- Range • • Tolerance Zone 18 1'-------:-----===========================17 i 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2, °1 "~$'$$~~"..."-/I -1 -2 ,iii'iii Iii i 1 I I I I (I I (iii (iii iii iiiI I I I I I I Iii i ,iii iii - () Q) '- ::J-o '- Q) 0.. E Q) l- Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation f-e - Juvenile Rearing I I I Outmigration •I I • t;d 0:> MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water I "J ~I ,).J 1 1 --I -.)11 J PINK SALMON .--1 J -1 --1 1 I Peak I I Range •• Tolerance Zone • I ,.-- • I I • n • I I • r--e 18 -11-========================= 17 16 15 • 14 13 J- 12 1110 I 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 a I I -1 ' -2 I > """,.·.,.••4"'"v .-~.".~->, I •ill Iii i i J i ii'Iii iii iii iii iii iii Iiiii.. U a> '- j-o L- a>a. E a> I- Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigratioa o:l \,() MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching (>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water COHO SALMON Peak t-t Range • • Tolerance Zone' 18 1------=-===================== 1716 I 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 - 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 i \1 \~.A A Ai ILaI Io_I .A TVI -1 ),"!'$+$$'t~17"'\/'I -2 () Q) '- :J-o '- Q) a. E Q) I- Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning -I I --Incubation ~ Juvenile Rearing I I , Outmigration'-I I • OJ I-'o MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 1;+ ¢ Natural Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water ]:1 I J I I 1 I 1 1 11 CHUM SALMON '1 J '-1 1 , I I Peak Range • • • I I • • I I • .... • I I.•• r--e 18 '·--r---------------======================== 17 • 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I I ,'>""'dl-1 VIV 't¥'t$e$~~$$'llJl ) {I -2 "iii iii iii iii Iii Iii iii iii iii iii iii j iii iii iii iii iii' () CD ~ :J-o ~ CDa. E CD I- Adulllnmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration' b:l ~ ~ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching o Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water CHINOOK SALMON Peak t--t- Range •• Tolerance Zone 18 -r----~------======================~ 17 1 16 -I i 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I '\"$f ~~"$(l$.~~(l""'l7f \I I -1 -2 'J iii iii iii iii iii iii i ,i j i i j iii iii iii iii iii,,iii iii i i (,) IP L- ::J-o L- IP Cl. E G> t- Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I J • Incubalion f----.--Juvenile Rearing •I I Outmigralion'•I .1 • ttl..... N MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water .1 I .J 1 J -J I I "]III -1 SOCKEYE SALMON ]1 )-J -~J Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I •r--e -Incubation Juvenile Rearing I I 1 I OUlmigration"•I I •, Range •• Peak .--,_.----. 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 f/\~Tolerance Zone 0 11 tD 10 ~9:J I:d .... .....0 8 l,.o.l ~ Q) 7a. E 6Q) t-5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <)Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water • I I - Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigralion ~ • I I -.,,--..- PINK SALMON Range.- Peak ,---.- Tolerance Zone b:I...... .po. (J. Q) L. :J-o L. CI>a. E CI>..... 18 17 16 15 14 13 J A I 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 - 4 3 2 1 a i ",,,'$~~."$$$$~~$...I 'l1 \l I -1 -2 , ,iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i ,iii (iii i ,iii iii MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR <~,J .,~ I 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water .I Adult Inmigration ~•I I • Spawning •I I. Incubation.I Juvenile Rearing I I Ou!migration I .----1 ,.I 1 1 1 I J i l'..1 COHO SALMON 1 1 J J 1 i 1 Range •• Peak I I 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 i f/\Tolerance Zone <k. 0 11 (I)10 L-9:J...... ttl 0 8I-'L- VI Q) a.7 E 6Q) l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001.Case C Inflow Matching <)Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Oulmigration· CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I • • I I. Range •• Peak .-f-~ Tolerance Zone td...... CJ'\ () Q) ~ :J..-o ~ Q) Q. E Q).- 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o -1 -2 'i iii iii Iii iii iii iii iii Iii i r iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ( I , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR .1...).J 1 981 -82 RM 1 50 Natural +.Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water I,:,.,).I J ..l I I 1 ]I --J .-1")1 CHINOOK SALMON ]1 1 J I Peak Range •I.... •• Tolerance Zone (J Q) ~ :J 0+-o ~ Q) 0. E Q) l- Adulllnmigralion b ·I;,· Spawning •I I ~I Incubation • _Juvenile Rearing I .I IIOutmigration-I·I I.I 1 B -I ~ 17 16 1 I 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 B 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 O ),<>,..-'II -1 -2 'i iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i i j iii iii iii iii iii i , t:d............ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 1 50 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water SOCKEYE SALMON Adult Inmigrnlion •I I • Spawning •I I • ~-Incubalion ....IJuvenileRearing•-r OUlmigration •I I • Range •• Peak .--,------. APR Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MARNOVDECJULAUGSEPOCTMAYJUN 18 I I 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 -7 6 5 4 3 2 1 °1 "...........-'I -1 -2 'i iii iii iii iii iii iii i I Iii iii I iii iii iii i t iii iii iii Ii' \ () Q,) l... :J 0+-o l... ([) 0- E OJ I- tl:l I-' (Xl 1981 -82 RM 1 50 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water j I cl ~I I .1 --J 1 J )1-1)·~····-I PINK SALMON 1 I •I I Range , Peak •• Tolerance Zone • I I •-,,- u a> ~ ::::J...-o l0..- a> 0- E a> I- Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation _Juvcnile Rcaring _I Outmigration I ,.I I •I 18 -r'-------------------------------i 17 16 15 14 13 I I 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01'!),[>J I -1 -2 r iii iii'iii iii iii iii iii iii i i J ii'iii Iii iii iii iii iii I , b:I to-' '-0 1/ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 150 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching (>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water COHO SALMON • I ,. • I I • • I I. Adull Inmigralion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Hearing I I I I OUlmigralion' Range •• Peak .----..- Tolerance Zone 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 ~6 5 4 3 2 <f l'[\•OJ I I 1 a 1 "...............J I -1 -2 r Iii iii I Iii iii iii Iii i i I I J iii iii iii iii ,iii iii iii I iii' () III I- :J-o I- ID Q. E ID.- txt Nq MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water ]1 t _I .1 -_I ]--.1 -J I .1 J _1 --I 1 1 )i J I 1 CHUM SALMON J 1 1 I • I I • • I I • Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation I JUv:;~:~~~:~::~I:I I:i Range •• Peak ,, Tolerance Zonet:d N...... () Q) ~ :l-o ~ CD D- E Q) I- 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I I I ),(''>r I -1 -2 ~I I iii iii iii I I iii Iii iii I i I Iii i I I Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water • I I. • I I • • I I • CHINOOK SALMON Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing I I I I Outmigralion· Range • • Peak r J- Tolerance Zone . 0:1 N N () II) L. ::J-o L. II) Q.. E II) I- 18 17 16 1 I 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 ),/'>./I -1 -2 'i iii Iii iii iii iii Iii iii iii iii iii iii Iii iii iii iii iii i , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water ~~.I 1..1 I J .cl .1 -1 .I 1 )1 --1 ]----1 -1 SOCKEYE SALMON J ~-1 i 1 Peak I -. Range • • Tolerance Zone () Q) "- :J "t-o "- Q) 0- E Q) I- Adulllnmigralion • I I • Sp.wn;ng b ~I :.Incubation.I _.1uvenile RearinfJ II~-O~l~igratio~I.I I·I 18 I I 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 '>/'>/I -1 - 2 'I 1-1"".---J -I -.Ii'I ,iii iii Iii iii j i I Iii iii iii i ,i i }iii iii Iii I tp N W MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water PINK SALMON .". Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing OUlmigralion ~ •'I • • I I-- Range • • Peak I -. APR Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MARNOVDECJULAUGSEPOCT 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 ()11 CD 10 ~ ::J 9 t;;d -N 0 8+:--~ Q) 70.. E 6CD I-5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ..."... MAY JUN 1981-82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water J J J J .,1 2>','I J -.-1 c---I ---1 --1 .------'I c.----1 COHO SALMON -I 1 i 1 Peak I I Range Tolerance Zone - I I •-I I- () CD ~ :J-o ~ CDa. E CD I- Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubation ~•Juve~iJe ~ear!ng.~.I I _i Outmigraiion I •I I -I 18 I I 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2;\~?,~'''~ll 1 o I)"/"),,/"I -1 -2 'i iii iii r iii iii iii iii I i I Iii iii iii iii iii Iii iii iii ii', tt:I N VI MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 130 Natural . +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water CHUM SALMON Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigralion' • I I • • I I • I-----e • I I • Range •• Peak I I APR Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MARNOVDECJULAUGSEPOCT 18 17 - 16 15 14 13 12 u 11 Q)10 ~9::l b:t ..- N 0 80\~ Q) 70. E 6Q) I-5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 •••I ••G MAY JUN 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water J -".J ..J J I I J J I ",J ),'I 1 1 1 CHINOpK SALMON 1 1 )! Adult Inmlgration •I I • Spawning •I "• Incubation ----. Juvenile Rearing I I I Outmigration'•I I • Range •• Peak t--t- Tolerance Zone to N "-J () Q) L- :J "t- O L- Q) Q. E Q) I- 18 1 I 17 16 1 I 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I >"f+&"-'$$$$¥&$fl l "I -1 -2 'i iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i ,•iii i·i ,t iii iii ~ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 1 00 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching ¢Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water SOCKEYE SALMON Peak .-I Range •• Tolerance Zone 18II 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o 1 '>"""*"'$"'-~$$$"~$f I \ (I -1 -2 ,iii iii iii Iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i ,~ (J a> L- :J-oL- a> 0- E a> I- AduU Inmigration •i I • Spawning •I I • Incubation '-----e Juvenile Rearing I I I Oulmigrnlion'•I I •- t1:i N 00 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water 'I ,J J "I ,.J I I J I 1 "I "1 1 1 1 rr ~l "--1 PINK SALMON -1 -J 1 -I Range I ! Peak •• Tolerance Zone - I I • - I I- 1811--------~=============== 17 1 16 15 14 13 -I A 12 I 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o -11--,---------IL----~---=~~~i&_+......L~_+4L~-L~,>...*t ..7$•••"'.f ( ){I -1 -2 r iii iii iii iii iii'iii i j iii iii'iii iii ii'iii iii iii Iii i • () a> L- :J -+-o L- a> 0.. E a> I- Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing i OutmigmUQii I •i i •I b:l N \0 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water COHO SALMON AduU Inmigralion •I I • Spawning .,I • Incubalion L...e - Juvenile RcariM I I OUfmigration .•I I • Range •• Peak •• Tolerance Zone b:l Wo () CD l- ::J 0+-o l- CDa. E CD I-- 18 17 16 15 14 -t----' 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2-1 \~8'(,;II I 1 o I ....lS~¥"$GG$¥lflGf {'\I I -1 -2 ,iii iii iii'i j iii iii iii'iii iii iii i j iii Iii iii iii ii'i ,, MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water ....."I I I I ~j L'~.J .1 .1 J ]~. - APPENDIX C Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperature tolerance criteria for natural,Case C "inflow matching,lI and Case E-VI lIinflow matching"-Scenario Page 1981-1982 Watana 2001,RM 150 Five species CI-C5 Watana 2001,RM 130 Five species C6-CI0 Watana 2001,RM 100 Five species Cll-CIS 1981-1982 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 Five species C16-C20 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 Five species C21-C25 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 Five species C26-C30 ..... 33RD3-008 - - - 1 ~l I ]-11 ····1 CHUM SALMON ---1 -].]'--J ] Range t-+ Peak •• Tolerance Zone • I I • • I I • CD L- :J 0+-o L- CDa. E CD I- u Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation _Juvenile Rearing I ••• I Outmigration ·1 •I I.I 18 I l 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ~-W "T.\-.~¥.,..<>,J I -1 -2 -J iii iii iii Iii iii i I I Iii iIi iii iii iii iii iii'iii iii iiI i , () i-' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 200 1 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 200 1 Case E-VI Inflow Matching CHINOOK SALMON t--t Peak Range •• Tolerance Zone 18 I I 17 16 1 I 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 ".......-1 -1 -2 r iii iii iii ii'i ,iii i ,iii i ,Iii iii iii'iii iii iii iii',i i ~ () Q) l... :J.....o l... Q) Q. f Q) ~ Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation ~- Juvenile Rearing I I•I Outmigralion'I I •.- (") N MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 .J J J J J ] Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching J ,J I J J J I 1 ]I )Cl -~-I __C)1 SOCKEYE SALMON _·········1 1 J I Peak ~ Range•• Tolerance Zone (J CD L- :J "t- O L- a> 0- E CD I- Adult Inmigral~on b ·I ~'•: Spawnmg •I • Incubation.I i Juvg~:~~~:~:~~I ~I I . •I 18 ,I 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I :".c........J I -1 -2 'i iii iii j iii iiiiii iii Iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii.i ,iii' (') w MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 1 50 /. Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching PINK SALMON t-t- Peak Range • • Tolerance Zone • I I..... • I I • • I I • I-- 18 1'r-------------:------==========• 17 16 15 14 13 I I 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I '')<>..J II -1 -2 ,i Ii iii iii iii ii'iii j i ,iii Iii iii'iii iii iii iii iii iii i II () Q) L.. :J-o L- a> 0... E Q) I-- Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing OUlmigralion (") +:- MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching o Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching J .'J:,,~)J ,..J J .J 1 I 1 ---]~1 -I -~~CI COHO SALMON I J 1 I 1 1 Range Peak •• -;---; '"Tolerance Zone ' u Q) L. ::J....o L. Q) 0- E Q) I- Adult lnmigralion L ·I I • Spawning •I I. Incubation.I •Juvenile Rearing I _I OUI~igration 'I •I I.I 18 •i 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 --I \.........vr ~~-'h J9'..",~..xf \":/"I I 1 01 "[.........J I -1 -2 'i iii iii iii i i Ii iii Iii iii iii'iii iii ii'iii',iii ii'iii' C1 VI MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 1 50 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching ••• I I. Adu/l Inmigration Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing Outmigration' I-e CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I •- Range •• Peak t--+- Tolerance Zone('") 0\ () (I) L- :::s-o L- a>a. E Q) I- 18 1.1--------------=-==============~. 17 16 15 - 14 - 13 12 - 11 - 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I I I '>v ~$e ~.v '>r I -1 -2 ....., ,iii iii iii iii ii'iii iii ii'iii'iii iii'iii I iii iii Iii i , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR I ,I .1 I 1 981 -82 RM 1 30 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching ~1 J I 1 1 1 "-'-1 I '1 '1 "1 J 1 ')J CHINOOK SALMON IAdult In migration I ·It·I Sp:mnillg •I I ~ Incubation ~••~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I Juvenile Rearing I . Outmigratioo .•I I. Range •• Peak I I Tolerance Zone (') -...J () Q) ~ :l..-o ~ Q) Q. E Q) t- 18 "I'r---------------------------=::......,. 17 16 I i 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 .,." G 5 4 3 2 1 o I "V ~$f )"",f'"v),/I -1 -2 ;iii iii iii'iii iii iii iii iii ii'iii iii i i J i j iii iii iii ii' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR .APR 1981-82 RM 130 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching SOCKEYE SALMON AduH Inmigralion •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubalion f---e - I IJuvenileRearing•, OUlmigralion •I I • Range •• Peak I I APR Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MARNOVDECJULAUGSEPOCT 18 17 16 - 15 14 13 12 ()1 1 CD 10 (") L.. (Xl ::J 9-0 BL.. Q) 7a. E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 "- 0 -1 -2 •"u "~• MAY JUN 1 98 1 -82 RM 1 30 J 1 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana.2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching iJ :,~J -I J I ! J I 1 I I J 1 J I )I i 1 PINK SALMON Range •• Tolerance Zone -I I- - I I • () CD ~ :J-o ~ CD a. E CD.- Adull Inmigralion Spawning IncubalionIJuvenilcRcaring I I Peak Outmigration _I I _I I . 18 -f i 17 16 15 14 13 J I 12 1 1 10 9 8 - 7 6 5 4 3 2 '1 o -1 -2 (") \D MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 1 30 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching COHO SALMON Adult Inmigralion •I I -Spawning -I I • Incubation ~.tJuvenileRearingII Outmigralion'-I I • na~ge •• Peak ,--.-,J Tolerance Zone' 18 •l 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 -J \lit:_~l:J ~_A'vJl I I ,1 o i "V ~$4'~Y>',/I -1 - -2 --r i i j iii iii i i (iii iii iii iii iii iii i j iii j iii i j iii I iii i i P () CD L- :J..-o L- CD Q. E CD t- (").....o MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP'OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 'f__,I J J + o Natural Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching ,I __,.",,1 ,",,'".J ,) ----I "J J ----1 .j-1 ---I CHUM SALMON 1 1 1 --1 Peak t--t Range ••• Tolerance Zone • I I • • I I • u a> L- :J 0+-o L- a> 0- E a>.- Adull lnmigralion Spawning Incubation •Juvenile Rearinp I ••-I --Out~ig~atio~·1 •I I·I 18 ...• 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I I I '\..~..."ll$$$$.....~$flr'{I -1 -2 ~Iii ii'iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i i (iIi i •ii'iii iii iii' (') i-' i-' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching o Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching CHINOOK SALMON Adull Inmigralion •I I • Spawning •I J • Incubation ~- IJuvenileRearing'I ~I I Oulmigration'I • Range •• Peak t--t- 18 17 16 15 14 1 ,I Tolerance Zone 13 12 ()11 a>10 L-9n:l-.....0 8NL- a>7Q. E 6a> l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 -Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching o Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching cl J )I >.1 ...J ••J J J 1 ~~l j )··~1 '-1 ,······1 SOCKEYE SALMON 1 1 1 1 T·-~·.- Peak Range •• Tolerance Zone () Q) "- :J of-o "- Q) a.. E lP I- A.dUI!Inmigrallon hOI ~0 Spawning 0 I :0 Incubntion.I Juvenile Rearing .I Outmigration ·1·I I.I 18 -i • 17 .16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I )0 "$'"....,...~$$61en t6lf I r ) (I -1 -2 ,I I iIi Iii Iii iii t iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii'iii iii iii ii' ()......w MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E~VI Inflow Matching PINK SALMON Peak I I Range'.. Tolerance Zone - • I I • • I I. • I I • l--e 18 -J-===============~= 17 16 1514 '13J!lJI~~-~12 1110 I 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 a I J -1 J_ 2 ,>,,~looV, , , , , , ,10 ••••«..,10.-,,'"wI"! ...,..I iii iii iii I Iii j Iii iii iii j Iii ii' () Q) L- ::J-o L- Q) a. E Q).- Adult Inmigralivn Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration (')......p. MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 .J ];\cl .J Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching o Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching ,]....J J J 1 1 )1 ]c 1 cl c ee ) COHO SALMON J I • I I • • I I. Adullinmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Renrin!!I I!I Outmigrntio~I ~I I. Range • • D~nLr A ~"'" -t ce T - Tolerance Zone . C1 I-' lJ1 o CD "- :J 0+-o "- (I) Q. E (I).- 1 B -I i 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 B 7 6 5 4 3 2J \'.~11 I 1 o 'I J.'$~'VY II $$$$.......t $fir )I I -1 -2 ~i [iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii I Iii ii' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Inflow Matching <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Inflow Matching •• • I I • • I I •- CHUM SALMON Adult I"migralion I Spawning Incubalion ~ Juvenile Rearing OUlmigration·1 •I I • Range.'. Peak -;--t Tolerance ZoneC".l..... 0\ (J Q) L. :J-o L. Q) Q., E Q).... 18 1 I 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 '1 o I 'I ><>(M -1 - -2 ,iii iii iii iii Iii iii iii Ii'Iii i i j iii iii iii iii iii Ii'ii' MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR .) 1 981 - 8 2 RM 1 50 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching I ...·.1 .11 lel]I J J 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 J )I j --1 CHINOOK SALMON Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning e I I • Incubation ~- Juvenile Rearing I I I I I Outmigration·•I • Range • • Peak .---. Tolerance Zone C":l........... u CD L :J..-o L CD Q. E Q) I- 18 1 l 17 16 -I I 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 - 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I '>.c.........l -I -1 -2 'i iii iii i i 1 ,iii ii'iii',iii iii iii iii i j iii iii iii iii iii MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 150 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching SOCKEYE SALMON AduU Inmigralion •I I • Spawning •I I •-Incubation ~ Juvenile Rearing I I I I Ou lmigration •I I • Rl;Inge •• Peak I I Tolerance Zone C1..... CXl (J CD L- :J-a L- CDn. E CD I- 18 1 I 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ,1 o I ".............J I -.1 -2 ,iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i ,iii i j iii ii'iii iii i •iii'i l i I , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN ·FEB MAR APR _J -J + <> 1981-82 RM 150 Natural Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching DevilCanyon 2002 Case E-VI.InflowMatching I""];c]C'i.]".~.~.,,"]>~,~,j,.,>~J .J Adulllnmigralion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing OUlmigralion ] • I I • • I I. ~ • I I • PINK SALMON J 1 1 Range •• Peak -+---i 1 Tolerance Zone C":l ~ \.0 o Q) I- :J-o I- Q) a.. E Q) I- 18 ,• 17 16 15 14 13 I I 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 - ,1 o I I !><>J I -1 -2 f iii Iii iii ( ,iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii Iii iii iii ~ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching COHO SALMON Adult Inmigrntion -I I • Spawning -,I -Incubation ~ Juvenile Rcarinr I I Outmigration'-I ,.' Range.- Peak r-• Tolerance Zone ' 18 1 I 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 ~]?:\~#)64.~~·/I .1 o I "L....",---'I -1 -2 'I iiI i itt Iii J Iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii I I iii iii iii iii r (,) Q) "- ::J-o "- Q) a.. E Q) I- n No I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP-OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching cl I .I ",.1 L_~~J !J J _I 1 1 1 ~1 '-C]-~1 C).'.~1 ) • I I. Adull Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration' r-- CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I •- Range •• Peak -t--t '11!" Tolerance Zone(") N..... o a> L- ::J....o L- a> 0.. E a> I- 18 lr-------------...:.;;;:;;;;::::~========= 17 I 16 15 14 - 13 12 - 11 10 9 8 7 6 - 5 4 3 - 2 1 o I I I ::,< )<I -1 -2 ,iii iii I iIi iii i I I ,iii iii i •iii i • • ••I I • •iii j iii iii iii i • MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching CHINOOK SALMON Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation -----IJuvenileRearingI•IOutmigralion.•I • Range •• Peak t--+ Tolerance Zone (") N N u (I) L- :J -+-o L- (I) a. E (I) I- 18 I I 17 16 -t , 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 '>?),/I -1 -2 F iii iii iii iii iii iiI iii iii iii iii'iii iii iii Ii'iii Iii', MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR .)I .1 1981 -82 RM 1 30 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching ]111 _...J J 1 <I <-J J 1 1 .1..·1 ]~]J J I SOCKEYE SALMON I I Peak Range • • Tolerance Zone • I I •• I I. u Q) L- :J....o L- Q) 0- E Q) I- Adulllnmigralion Spawning 1-JUVen:l~e~:::;~;I~.•!II .Outmlgrallon·..•I.I.. 18 1--------------------------- 17 I 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o."<><I -1 -2 'j j i j j j j j iii i j j iii i i ]j j j i j j j iii j i j j j ] j i j j i J iii i j i j j , L.l N W ·MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching Adu/l Inmigra/ion Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Ou/migra/ion • I I • • I I. I-- • I I • PINK SALMON Range •• Peak ,-------. Tolerance Zone (J N+:-- t> Q) ~ ::J-o ~ CD 0- E Q) I- 18 T I 17 16 15 14 13 -I I 12 11 10 9 8 - 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01''""'L I -1 -2 "ii'iii iii'iii iii iii iii ii',ii',,,iii i i •iii iii iii i ,• MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching I I I I J I I I I I COHO SALMON Adult In migration •I I -Spawning -,I -..Incubation ~ Juvenile Rearing I . Outmigration -I I - Range • • Peak ..--. 'II Tolerance Zone . () N U1 () G) lo- j "i-o l0- G) Q. E Q) t- 18 i • 17 16 15 14 -J..-J 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 - 2]\\:v1k ~/I 1 o I '>/"'\/"I -1 -2 -J,'I Iii iii iii iii iii i i J J i J iii i J iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i I ~ MAYJUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 1 30 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching . CHUM SALMON • I I • Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration· r----e • I I • • I I •- Range •• Peak I I Tolerance Zone 18 "-------------===============~ 17 ' 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 - 3 2 -, 1 o 1 ',),....~~$••F ~$~( ) {I -1 -2 r iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii'iii iii,"I Jiiiir (j CD "- :J 0+-o "- CDn. E CD I- (') N 0\ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 100 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching I I I I J I ,I I I ~,J 1 J -1 ]1 J 1 )---I --1 1 i --~I CHINOOK SALMON I Peak t--t Range •• Tolerance Zone I,. 18 llr-----=:=======================~ 17 -j 16 1 I 15 I 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o ~lr---------------~-~~H~~......H~~~t-~~l~-1 '>~~$$$AV~",4 .....,........{ \ ( I -2 r iii iii iii i j iii iii iii ii'iii iii j iii i i iii iii iii iii iii' .(,) cv ~ :J of-o ~cv a. E cv I- Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation f-e '- Juvenile Rearing I I I Outmigralion'•I I • C1 '"....... MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching SOCKEYE SALMON Adult Inmigrntion •I I • Spawning •I I •-Incubation r---- IJuvenileRearingI I I Outmigration·•I I • ltange • • Peak .------. Tolerance Zone (") tv 00 (J a> L. ::J "t- O L. a>a. E a> I- 18 1 I 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I "\~~.$.r ~$"()(I -1 -2 ~iii iii iii iii I I iii iii I i I I I I A I I A I I , I I I I iii iii iii,iii' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR ~I J ) 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +:Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching ¢Devil Canyon 2002 Case E·VI Inflow Matching I l "1 CI 1 ]1 J ...._].] PINK SALMON .--I J 1 1 1 J • I I • •I ,. Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation •Juvenile Rearinfr .-I Outmigratio~I •I I •I 18 1 f 17 Range •• Peak I I APR Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MARNOVDECJULAUGSEPOCT ..r- IO 15 - 14 13 12 (,)11 Q)10 I- :J 9 (')-N 0 8\.0 I- Q)7D- E 6Q) l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 • I •••••• MAY JUN 1981 -82 RM 1 00 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o \Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching COHO SALMON Adulllnmigralion •I I • Spawning • I I • Incubalion ~...- Juvenile Rearing I Outmigralion'•I I • Range •• Peak.----. Tolerance Zone . (") Vlo o CD li... :J.....o li... CDa. E CD I- 1 B •• 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 -I \£ilqt;=14t.II I 1 o I "'$Gf%>.lY=$•$•fir'1>.(f { \ (I -1 -2 'i iii Iii iii I I Iii iii iii iii Iii Iii iii iii i [iii iii iii (i i , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 1 00 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Inflow Matching o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Inflow Matching J .J I APPENDIX D Temperature chronologies at three middle river locations in relation to five Pacific salmon life stage temperature tolerance criteria for natural,Case C 'warmest water," and Case E-VI "warmest water" Scenario Page 1981-1982 Watana 2001,RM 150 Five species D1-D5.....Watana 2001,RM 130 Five species D6-D10 Watana 2001,RM 100 Five species Dll-D15 1981-1982 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 150 Five species D16-D20 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 130 Five species D21-D25 Devil Canyon 2002,RM 100 Five species D26-D30 ..... ! ... ! 33RD3-008 - - - J 1 1 1 -I -1 CC--l CHUM SALMON 1 1 ..----1 1 ) Adult Inmigralion ~•I I •I Spawning .:I I • Incubalion .I luveniie Rearing I ::I OUlmigralion •I I. Range • • Peak t-t- Tolerance Zone 18 •• 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 -.., 3 2 .1 o I ',>•<>d I -1 -2 "iii iii iii iii'iiiiii ii'iii ii'iii ii',iii iii iii iii ii' o CD '- :J....o '- CDa. E CD I- t:::l...... MAY JUN JUL AUG SEp·OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water 0-Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water CHINOOK SALMON Adult Inmigratiol'1 .•I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation ~- Juvenile Rearing'I I ~IOUlmigralion'I • Range •• Peak •• Tolerance Zone t;;l N o CD.... ::J of-o.... CDa. E CD I- 1 ~•• 17 16 I I 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 '1 o -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 .,I 1981 -82 RM 150 --INatural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water ¢Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water .>I .J ]B 1 -)I 1 1 )1 SOCKEYE SALMON Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation ------- Juvenile Rearing . I 1 I Outmigration •I I • Range • • Ptak I • 18 •• 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 (\Tolerance Zone 0 11 tj CD 10 w L..9:s-0 8L.. CD 7a. E 6CDto-5 4 3 .2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water ¢Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water • I I •Adult Inmigralion I Spawning Incubation J---e Juvenile Rearing OUlmigralion I •I I • • I I.-- PINK SALMON Range •• Peak -t--t 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 0 11 -I I ~~Tolerance Zone lI)10 t:l I-~:J 9..... 0 8l- ll) 7a. E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 150 ].1 + <> Natural Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water Watana 2001 Gase S-YI Warmest Watt:r ,.~I"I;J>..c.J ~;,I I ,,;;~..J )J .c1 1 -1 ]1 C__'C]J -1 COHO SALMON Range Peak •• -r-J Tolerance Zone • I I • • I I. () GJ '-:J-o '-IDa. E ID I- Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation ( I Juvenile Rearing·II +I -I Outmigration'•I I ~ 18 '1.-------------- 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 .,\.~zk,~o*<~=*\'iOl~~~1 I ·1 o I .....I ..c">..J I -1 -2 r iii iii Iii iii iii iii iii j iii iii'ii'Iii I ,iii iii iii', , ,r Cl VI MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN fEB MAR APR ,981-82 RM 150 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water <)Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water CHUM 'SALMON Adulllnmigralion I •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation t:·I Juvenile Rearing •• OUlmigration'•I I. 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 ()11 CD 10 t:l L..9,0'\::J /"J l/.~~&IfA ~.Tolerance Zone-0 8L.. CD 7Q. E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 Range •• Peak ~ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR I J 1981-82 RM 130 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water I ~..,)W~~;~.)20(l~:Slse ~=~JJ Wa~:"'!'f W~.t!"~J .1 I 1 ,-"~1 J 1 ~-J 1 ) CHINOOK SALMON 1 I 1'----1 1 1 1 Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation ~- Juvenile Rearing·i i I I I Outmigration .•I • Range••• Peak t--i Tolerance Zone t::l -....I (J ~ ::J-o L- IDa. E II) I- 18 17 ~I 16 •I 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I 1~~- o 1 ""'l I I ('1 4 ".....r I -1 -2 ,iii i ,i I I I i I I Iii I I iii iii I iiiiii Iii iii i ,iii Iii i j iii i I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 130 --Natural +Watana 2001 Case C W~rmest Water ¢Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water SOCKEYE SALMON Adulllnmigralion •I I • Spawning •I I •-Incubaliol'P r---- Juvenile Rearing I I 1 , OUlmigralion •I I • Range •• Peak I I Tolerance Zone t:1 00 u Q) ~ :J-o ~ Q) Q.. E Q) f- 18 1 I 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I >.">I I I r 1 1<T <>.,I -1 -2 'i iii iii iii iii iii'iii iii I Iii iii iii iii'iii'i , ,iii iii ~ MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR ,I _.l ....1 .1 + <> 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water W,t~~,12~1;~rse :-Yi Wal"l11,]'t Wale] I '~'--'"'-'~'"'__0 ",,'.'"_•.•,,-•--J J 1 I -I .1 1 1 .--...-]1 I 1 1 -~ • I I • Adult In migration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing OUlmigralion ~ • I I • • I I- "'" PINK SALMON Range •• Peak t--t- t::I \0 () ~ ::J....o... CDa. E CD J- :~~I 16' 15 14 13 -I I 12 1 1 i I ~~Tolerance Zone 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I ''>......,I I r 1 14'"('>r I -1 -2 r iii iii iii iii ,i i •I iii iii ii'i i j iii iii iii ii'j Iii I ,iii. MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water .<>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water COHO SALMON Adult Inmigralion •I I • Spawning -,I • Incubalion ~- Juvenile Rearing I I Outmigralion·•I I • Range•• Peak •I Tolerance Zone' t::l i-'o u ~ ::J-o L. II>a. E CD I- 18 I I 17 16 15 14 -f--J 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I \k:'''Xl':p.'l!::::.(J.~f611\J.A ,..\~}K2V 1 o I "-""'I I I ('1<'1:""C I -1 -2 ,i i j iii iii i i j i !,iii iii i i ft iii iii Ii'i ,Ii',iii iii j iii I P MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR J 1981-82 RM 130 --Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water <>Watana 2001 Case E-VI Warmest Water I I ..1 1 -1 1 1 ..1 ••• I I. Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing OUlmigration· j---. CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I •....I Range • • Peak I I 18 •• 17 Tolerance Zonet:::l.......... u CD L- ::J-o L- CDa. E CD I- 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Io-~I I '>ll''f r "....r •••?¥)l I -1 -2 'i i , ,iii iii iii iii iii ii',iii iii i j iii iii'i ,j iii iii iii' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 -,Natural +Watana 200 1 Case C Warmest Water o Watana 2001 Csc E-VI Warmest Water CHINOOK SALMON Adull Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation f-e Juvenile Rearing'I I I.• Outmigratioli'•I I • Range •• Peak t-:--t Tolerance Zone tj I-' N U Q> L. :J-o L. Q> a. E Q> ~ 18 I I 17 16 I i 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2, o I ......"$1 'ft'"'$••_(ll ....*)I I -1 -2 ~iii iiiiii iii iii iii iii iii iiiiiiiiiiii iii iii iii iii i i ~ MAY·JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 ~=-]) ,981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water W~.o~J1a 2.=..~~:.JCse ~~~J W,:~~~Jst '\:"..1"J ~--l ]-I 1 I ]J 1 ].:I ---1 ) SOCKEYE SALMON Adulllnmigralion •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubalion ~-- Juvenile Rearing I I 1 I OUlmigralion •I I • nange • • Peak I I 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1/\dLA •Tolerance Zone 0 1 1 S CD 10 L-W :J 9.... 0 8L- CD 7a. E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 1 00 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water <>W~tan'a 200 1 Cse E-VI Warmest Water • I I • Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigralion ~ • I I • • I I.- PINK SALMON Ra~ge •• Peak I I 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 0 11 CD 10 t::l L..~:l 9~... 0 8L.. CD 70- E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 e ,0 ~If ,II If MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MAR APR .1 .J I + A 1 981 - 8 2 RM 1 00 Natural Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water W~t,~~,f 2~~-2te E-,{rIWar~.A:li WPt:~1 .J ! 1 1 1 1 j ..~I 1 1 COHO SALMON Adult Inmigralion •I I • Spawning -,I • .Incubalion f-----. Juvenile Rearing I , OUlmigralion·•I ,• Range•• Peak -+----t Tolerance Zone' S In () Q) l- ::J-o l- Q) 0. E Q) l- 18 •• 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 - 7 6 5 4 3 2 -I \ \(:)lA.'I!I I 1 o I >••y r ......f •....,.....} { f -1 -2 'i ii'iii iii ii'iii iii'iii iii iii iii ii', ,iii'iii iii iii' MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Watana 2001 Case C Warmest Water <>Watana 2001 ese E-VI Warmest Water JAN FEB MAR APR ••• I I. Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration M CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I •... Range••• :Peak t---+- Tolerance Zone t::1 i-' 0'1 o lD L.. :J-C L.. lDa. E ·lD t- 18 111-----------..:.--::::::.============::= 17 I 16 15 14! 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01'I"£>.--.1 I -1 -2 'i iii iii iii ii'Iii iii ii'iii iii iii iii ii'iii'iii iii Iii r MAY JUN·JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR I I 1981 -82 RM 150 -Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water .1 I )..1 -1 --1 11·-.1 -1 CHINOOK SALMON 1 Adult Inmigration b ·I :'•ISpawning•'I ~ Incubation ._--------------------------------1 Juvenile Rearing I I Outmigration ·1.Ii.' Range •• Peak... I Tolerance Zone . t:l ~...... (.) CD L- :J....o L- CDa. E CD .1- 18 •, 17 16 I , 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 '>C'>.J I -1-~ -2 .p iii'iiI iii ii'iii', i • ,iii'iii ii', , , , ,iii'iii ii'iii i , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 150 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water SOCKEYE SALMON Adult Inmigralion •I I • Spawning •I I •-Incubalion I-e Juvenile Rearing I I I I OUlmigralion •I I • Range •• Peak I I 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 /\Tolerance Zone 0 11 CD 10 L-9t::I :J......+-00 0 8L- CD 7Q. E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 . MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR I J ..1 1 981 -82 RM 1 50 -Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water ¢Devil Canyon 2002 Case E·VI Warmest Water ~~~]:~~)-"_J J 1 1 1 )---1 I 1 -1 PINK SALMON 1 ]1 --j -j •'I • Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing OUlmigralion r--e • I I •.,,.Range •• , Peak I I . :~~I 16 I I 15 14 -I1'l 13 I I 12 11 1 I \Tolerance Zone 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 I I ><>--I -1 -2 r i j I Iii iii iii iii iii iii ii'iii , I i I Iii ,iii iii iIi iii , i i ~ () Q) ~ :J-o ~ Q) 0- E Q) I- g \D MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 150 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water COHO SALMON· Adult Inmigralion •I I • Spawning -I I • Incubalion r--e Juvenile Rearing i I i •OUlmigralion'-I ,- Range . -- Peak t--t- Tolerance Zone 18 •• 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 ~j1 \.1ttt~tktt~&··'·~f 1 o I ><">..I I -1 -2 'i Iii Iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ii',iii iii iii I ,i , o CD L-:s....o L- CDa. E CD.... t:I No MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 981 -82 RM 150 --·Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water J I .] 'C~]J I 1 '---1 r--~]-Cl J ]CCCj ,CC_--l 1 • I I. Adult In migration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration f--e CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I •- Range.'. Peak t--i 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 u 11 G)10 t::I L..9N:J ......+- 0 8L.. II 7a. E 6G)...5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ••,1 • ,• MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC [II I Tolerance Zone JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water CHINOOK SALMON Adult Inmigration •"• Spawning •I ,• Incubalion f--e,.. Juyenile Rearing , I I , OUlmigralioll .•I • Range •• Peak .---, Tolerance Zone t:;l N N o CD L- :J-o L- CDa. E fI) I- 18 •, 17 16 -I I 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o I '\-/,\"'"I -1 -2 'i Iii ,iii iii iii iii iii i ,iii iii iii iii iii ,iii i ,iii iii i ~ MAY.JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN fEB MAR APR ] 1981 -82 RM 130 -Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water c"c""~'];",~..~J 1 )1 -I .----1 ------1 SOCKEYE SALMON J I )--1)-]J Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •I I • Incubation f-e - Juvenile Rearing I I 1 I Outmigration'•I I • Range •• Peak t---+ Tolerance Zone .iI '"I :~1 I 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 '",I -1 -2 r iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii i I Iii , , ,iii iii i , i ,i , , CJ CD. L. :J +-o L. CDa. E CD... t:::l N W MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 130 -Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E~VI Warmest Water Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubation Juvenile Rearing Outmigration - I I • - I I- f---e • I I - PINK SALMON Range-,. Peak 1-----' Tolerance Zone t:l N +:- o Q) L. :J....o L. Q) a. E CD t- 18 I • 17 16 15 14 13 I I 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01''><><I -1 -2 r iii'i , ,iii'ii',iii iii iii ii'iii Iii ii'i ,iii iii i ,iii i • MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR ..]J _.J 1 981 -82 RM 130 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water I 1 c -~I )]1 ,1 '.-'-~-1 '1 j ] COHO SALMON t--t Peak Range . • • • I I • • I I. ~ Adull Inmigralion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing I :I I OUlmigration -•I ,. Tolerance Zone ' II I :~~I 16,- '• ' 15 14 -a---' 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 J \~*.?k :vIk ~l I 1 o I """\"I -1 -2 r iii iii iii Iii iii iii iii iii iii ii'iii iii', i ,j I ,j iii iii' () CD... :J....o... CDa.. E CD I- t::l N Ul MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN fEB MAR 'APR 1981 -82 RM 130 --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water o Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water Adult Inmigralion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing OUlmigration . CHUM SALMON • I I • • I I • M ••• I I. Range •• Peak .-.,------r- Tolerance Zone t:l N 0\ o lID L. ::l....o L. lID 0.. E..! 18 1 I 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01 I Y >~~•••,'ttl ()(I -1 -2 P i j iii i ,£Iii iii iii i a iii II H i Ugh & ,i ,,•i , , i ,B ,iii ii',I , , MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN fEB MAR APR I 1981-82 RM 100 -,Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water .,).1 1 I ----1 CHINOOK SALMON -1 --]]1 )1 Adult Inmigration •I I • Spawning •'I I • Incubation ~- Juvenile Rearing:I I I I I I OUlmigration'•• Range •• Peak t--t- li/'J Tolerance Zone - t:I N -.J o CD~. :J "t- O ~ Q) a. E CD ~ 18 •• 17 16 -I i 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ~-l "~A.•••~.rY\I I -1 -2 ,Iii'iii i i.1 iii iii i j iii I I I Iii iii iii'iii ii'iii Iii iii it MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1981 -82 RM 100 JAN FEB MAR APR --Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E~VI Warmest Water SOCKEYE SALMON Adult Inmigration •I I •- Spawning •I I • Incubation r-e -- Juvenile Rearing I I I I Outmigration·•I I • 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 J \ Tolerance Zone U 11 CD 10 L- 9t;j :::J 0+-N 0 800L- CD 7Q. E 6CD.-5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 Range •• Peak,, MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR ,~_--l 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water J';I--~!:I - .I I - -1 Adult Inmigrntion Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing Oulmigrntion 18 17 i6 15 14 13 12 0 11 CD 10 L t:::l :s 9 N .... \.0 e 8 CD 0.7 E 6CD l-S 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 --l-j ~ - I I - - I I-- -1 ] PINK SALMON ]1 --1 ] Range-• Peak I I Tolerance Zone MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981-82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water <>Devil Canyon 2002 Case E-VI Warmest Water COHO SALMON • I I. • I I • • I I. Adult Inmigration Spawning Incubalion Juvenile Rearing I I I I Outmigration· Range •• Peak -t---t Tolerance Zone 18 17 16 15 14 -I-J 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I \<%-.\A :/1 I 1 o -I '\.~~•••.A"'.•~I\I I -1 -2 r I I iii Iii iii iii iii i i j iii iii iii iii iIi iii iii iii iii Ii', (,) ID L- ::J....o L- ID 0- E ID I- t::Iwo MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1981 -82 RM 100 Natural +Devil Canyon 2002 Case C Warmest Water ¢Devil Canyon 2002 Case E·VI Warmest Water J