HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPA2906JJV\o,o~&...........1I_._,__
Susitna File No.4.5.5
--rt\
lL\~
':.s '(
i
\=47t:L
\(\{)_i2CrO~
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
RESOURCE USER SURVEY
Prepared by
The Institute of Social and Economic Research
Jack Kruse
Phil Rotve
Lee Huskey
In Collaboration with
Stephen Braund &Associates
Hellentha1 &Associates
Damas and Moore
Under Contract to
Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture
Prepared for
Alaska Power Authority
Final Report
June 1985
ARLIS
Alaska Resources
Library &Information ServJCetl.Anchorage,Alaska
I!
\
\
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge Jim Hemming of Dames and
Moore Consultants for constructing the geographic 'analysis areas
employed in this study.compiling information on major resource use
activities.and assisting in the overall design of the study.
Stephen Braund and his associates.Randall Hagenstein and Tim
Holmes.contributed to the design of the study and directed the
face-to-face interview portion of the study.Marc Hel1enthal
successfully directed the unusually large telephone survey and wrote
the questionnaire.Terry Hull.Darla Siver.Cathi Dwyer,Kandy
Crowe.and Jim Kerr made major contributions in data and word
processing.Any errors in the report are solely the responsibility
of the authors.
ARLIs
L ·A.laska l:llbrazy&I ..l\.esourcesnfonnatJ
AnChorage A.lon ServIces
•aska
ii
,-"
NOTICE
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS CONCERNING
THIS REPORT SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO
THE ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section/Title
ANALYSIS DESIGN
SAMPLE DESIGN
LEVELS OF RESOURCE USE
SURVEY POPULATIONS
1
3
29
SELECTION OF SURVEY APPROACH
Study Objectives .
Sununary of Results ....•.....••.••........................
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Introduction 59
Sununary of Resource Use Results •...••.......•...•.•...•..63
SURVEY ADMINISTRATION
Levels of Resource Use •.......•••..•...•.....•..•........45
Estimated Dollar Value of Resource Use Activities .......•45
Estimation of Relative Value of Resource Uses ..•...•.....53
Comparison of User Characteristics •....•.•...•...••...•.•56
Determination of Target Population .•.......•......•......11
Identification of Subpopulations ..•..............•.•.....12
Generalization to Individuals vs.Households 14
Selection of Respondent .....•..••........................15
Determination of Sample Size ..........•..................23
Telephone Sample Design .....•.........•.............•....23
Face-to-face Interview Sample ......................••....24
Feasibility of Conducting a Mail Survey.............7
Feasibility of Conducting Face-to-Face Interviews 8
Feasibility of Conducting Telephone Interviews 8
Survey Approach Selected •...••.•.•...•.......•..•.........9
QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN
IDENTIFICATION OF STUDY REGION .•..•......................17
Categories of Resource Use ...•..•.•......................39
Time Period Covered by the Survey .•.•.•........•.•....•..41
Selected Resource Use Experiences ...••.•.•...••.......•..42
Household Characteristics .....••••....•...•...•..........42
1.0
1.1
1.2
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.0
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.0
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
8.0
(j)8.1ex:>8.20.....8.3.q.q 8.4
0
0
0 9.0LO
LO
I"9.1('\I)
('\I)9.2
I
v
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title
4-1 Composition of Analysis Areas
5-1 Coding Categories for Small Town Households
rI
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
Estimated Sampling Errors by Subpopulation
Estimated Sampling Errors by Grouped Analysis Area
Estimated Sampling Errors by Resource Use:All Households
Estimated Sampling Errors by Resource Use:Urban Households
Estimated Sampling Errors by Resource Use:Small Town
Households
!I
6-6 Estimated Sampling Errors by Resource Use:Rural Households
7-1 Information Obtained About Selected Resource Use Experiences
7-2 Information Obtained About Characteristics of Resource Users
8-1 Reporting Categories for Levels of Resource Use
8-2 Activity,Population,and Location Groupings for Relative
Value Analysis
8-3 Urban,small Town,and Rural Economic Characteristics
9-1 Percent of Households Using Key Areas in 1984
10-1 Estimated Dollar Values of All Activities by Area
10-2 Estimated Dollar Values of Hunting by Area
10-3 Estimated Dollar Values of Fishing by Area
10-4 Estimated Dollar Values of Nonconsumptive Activities by Area
J
10-5 Estimated Dollar Values of Activities in Remote Areas by All
Households
vii
17
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Titie
3-1 Susitna Resource User Survey
4-1 Analysis Units outside Susitna Study Region
6-1 Distribution of Rural Nonphone Sample
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Number
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
Title
QUESTIONNAIRE
RESOURCE USE TABLES
ix
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
This study has four major objectives.These are:
•Estimate the number and percentage of study area (see
Figure 3-1)households engaging in resource use
activities in areas potentially affected by the Susitna
Hydroelectric Project.
•Estimate the present dollar value of these resource use
activities.
•Describe the relative qualities of different resource
use areas.
•Present data on the economic circumstances of urban,
small town,and rural Alaska resident resource users as
a means of describing the value of resource use
activities.
The resource-user survey results provide three major kinds of
I
information.First,they provide a comprehensive set of reliable
estimates of the number of Alaska residents who use resources in the
areas potentially affected by the Susitna Hydroelectric Project.
While it is possible to derive estimates of some forms of resource
use (e.g.,moose hunting,caribou hunting,king salmon fishing)from
data collected by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G),
little or no information exists for other activities (e.g.,summer
off-road vehicle use,backpacking,or waterfowl hunting).
Second,the resource-user survey identifies the extent to which
these resource demands are being generated by urban,small town,and
rural Alaska resident populations.Again,the residence of some,
but not all,types of resource users can be derived from ADF&G data.
Third,the survey provides empirically sound information about the
value of resource-use activities in areas both inside and outside
the areas most likely to be affected by the Susitna Hydroelectric
1
Project.This information previously did not exist for any type of
resource user on a broad geographical basis.
Although various studies of resource users and area settlements have
been or are being conducted,no comprehensive source of information
on Alaska resident resource uses occurring in the areas potentially
affected by the Susitna Project existed prior to the Resource User
Survey.without comparable information on all types of resource
activities,it was not possible to wedgh the distribution of costs
and benefits of the Project among various Alaska resident popula-
tions that could be affected by the Project.This study does not
provide information on nonresident resource use.The reader should
be aware that the results of this study strictly pertain to Alaska
resident resource use.
The data needs in this study were straightforward:who does what,
where,when,and with what purpose and benef i ts .The maj or
challenge of the study was not identifying data needs but rather
obtaining the data in a cost-effective manner since a large number
otlritervIews -were requIred to obtiiIri-1riformatIon-ona -relatIvely
small number of resource users.
A survey of some 1,300 southcentral residents in 1979 (ISER,1979)
indicated that some 15 percent of the adults (male and female)in
....._~.~_M!~.h().rag~_!l:t!.Q..~IiJ.;}::.banlt~..~w~.t!.~m().Q~~..J:lunt~..i.t!g ..~()_It!~~.h.er~~.1t!....!!.IiJ.~k~_it!.__._.._..~_.._
1-9-7-9-.-Tche-peI'cent-age-ef-adu-l-t-s-invel-ved-in-a-meese-hunt-in-t-he-aI'ea------
potentially affected by the Sustina Hydroelectric Proj ect was not
specifically measured but clearly was substantially less.Since
moose hunting is a relatively frequent activity compared with bear
hunting or even caribou hunting,obtaining sufficient data was more
difficult than the example suggests.
The low participation in resource use activities in the area
potentially affected by the Susitna Hydroelectric Project made it
2
,)
\
,\
{
,\
1
I
.r
I
.I
i
l
difficult to develop the required resource use information from a
general population survey.It was necessary to contact large
numbers of households to obtain sufficient data on households that
are involved in resource use activities in the area.The alter-
native methods by which a resource user survey might have been
performed and the reasons presented why a mixed telephone/
face-to-face survey approach was selected are explained in section
2.0.The remainder of section 1.0 contains a summary of study
results.
1.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Between February 15 and April 20,1985,4,545 study area residents
were interviewed on their hunting,fishing,and other recreational
activities.Respondents provided time and place information on
their household's participation in 21 activities and more detailed
participation information on two randomly chosen activities.
Location information was coded into 1 of 14 areas within a defined
study region or within i of 7 areas outside the study region.
Survey results established that resource use activities in the area
that would be inundated by the Susitna Hydroelectric Project involve
approximately 0.5 percent of all study area households annually.
The area north of the inundation zone that could be opened up for
increased use due to new road access is used annually by 1.4 percent
of all study area households and 3.3 percent of the study area's
rural households.Finally,the Susitna River reach between Devil's
Canyon and the confluence with the Chulitna River is used annually
for salmon fishing by 1.5 percent of all study area households.
Information about travel costs,travel time,and reported willing-
ness to pay additional money to engage in activities at particular
locations was used to estimate the dollar value of resource uses in
the potential inundation zone and other analysis areas.Results
3
indicate that the gross annual dollar value of locations in the
inundation zone as sites for resource use activities in 1984 was
between $176,000 and $500,000.These figures represent 0.5 percent
of the gross dollar value of all measured resource uses of study
area residents anywhere in the state in 1984.The estimated annual
dollar value of the reach of the Susitna River between Devil 9 s
Canyon and the confluence with the Chulitna River for recreational
and personal use salmon fishing is between $499,000 and $1,374,000.
Respondents were asked to rate the quality of 10 specific attributes
of the area they used for a selected resource use activity.They
were 2.,also asked to rate the quality of the same 10 attributes for
the best substitute location.The difference between these ratings
represents the comparative advantage of the chosen location over the
next best location.Results show that remote areas of the Susitna
study region have six comparative advantages for resource users who
live in rural areas:
•Ease of getting to area
•Beatn~y-cff~area-
•Familiarity with area
•Lower cost of activity
•Family tradition of doing activity in area
•Lack of crowding in area
______.....The_resul.ts_oLthe_dollaI'-v:alue_ana~y-sis-indicate_that_the_p-rimarY-_
value of the inundation zone is its value to urban resource users.
The same pattern applies to all other analysis areas.The absolute
number of urban resource users of the potential inundation zone is
28 times greater than the absolute number of rural resource users of
the ZC)Ile..Urban resource u~~rs als;o live fa.rth~r:a.wayfr:oIl\the area
and thus spend more to travel there.The incomes of urban resource
users also average twice that of rural resource users;as a result,
urban resource users spend more on their resource use activities.
4
1.
~,l
"}
'I
I
II
Analysis results show that rural resource users have chosen to live
in an area with fewer employment opportunities in order to live near
hunting and fishing opportunities.The dollar value analysis
results do not reflect the income opportunity cost of living in
rural areas and therefore understate the value of resource use
activities among rural residents.An indication of the under-
estimate is that 44 percent of rural residents who hunt and fish get
half or more of their food from resource use activities.Among
urban households involved in hunting or fishing,the comparable
figure is 18 percent.
As a whole,the resource use,dollar value,relative value,and user
characteristic analyses establish:
•Current levels of use in the potential inundation zone
are extremely low.
•Approximately 1.5 percent of all study area households
annually fish the study analysis area containing
susitna River reach between Devil's Canyon and
Talkeetna for salmon.
•The gross annual dollar value of the potential
inundation zone as a location for recreational
resource use and personal use is about 0.5 percent of
the value of all other resource use locations.
\
j
•The gross annual dollar value of the analysis area
containing the Susitna River reach between Devil's
Canyon and Talkeetna for salmon is approximately
2.4 percent of the value of all other fishing
locations.
•Both resource use and dollar value estimates for the
potential inundation zone are low for rural as well as
small town,and urban residents.
•In general,the value of resource uses to rural
residents is greater than the dollar value estimates
suggest.The dollar value estimates for rural
residents are constrained by low incomes which are the
result of preferences to live near resource use
opportunities.Even if the dollar value estimates
were adjusted to take rural income constraints into
account,the absolute value of the inundation zone to
rural residents would be low since few rural residents
use the area itself.
5
6
'j
'J
,J
I
,1
I 'J
,\
I
")
]
,.1
;(
J
)
"""""",',--,'0 ''__"""',__''",'--'-',,-,-----,--,'0,--,-----,--""------,,,-------,,,,,J
,~
,I
!
-'},
i I
),
i
\
!
J
2.0 SELECTION OF SURVEY APPROACH
2.1 FEASIBILITY OF CONDUCTING A MAIL SURVEY
The problem of obtaining data necessary to meet the objectives of
this study would be largely eliminated if accurate lists of all
those engaged in each activity of interest were available and could
be used in a targeted mail survey.The ADF&G uses this approach to
determine where licensed residents fish.Unfortunately,accurate
lists of berry-pickers,backpackers,kayakers,or many other types
of resource users are not available.Moreover,complete lists of
hunters or fishermen are not available since some rural residents do
not obtain licenses and license files are not updated frequently.
Even if such lists were available,however,a mail survey would not
be the preferred approach.
The ADF&G mail surveys are short and are sent to people who have a
personal interest in the topic of the survey (e.g.fishing to those
with fishing licenses),and who probably perceive the survey sponsor
as·an agency which provides them with significant benefits.
Research on mail survey response rates clearly indicates that the
length of the survey,the importance of the survey topic to the
respondent,and the type of sponsor are strongly related to response
rate (Linsky,1975).
In the case of the present study,respondents had to be asked about
a wide range of resource uses during more than one period of time
and in more than one area.Respondents could not reasonably be
expected to be interested in responding to a mail questionnaire
concerning all their resource use activities.In -addition,the
Alaska Power Authority could not validly portray itself as an agency
whose primary mandate is to improve the quality of the activities
pursued by respondents.As a result of these factors,even the best
designed mail survey would not achieve an acceptable response rate.
7
2.2 FEASIBILITY OF CONDUCTING FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEWS
Since the objectives of the study were not only to estimate the
'number of resource users but also to document the characteristics of
'resource users and the values associated with resource use,the
research design had to yield an adequate number of resource users to
permit an analysis of various target populations.For example,a
sample of 2,000 urban residents was estimated to be required to
generate a subs ample of roughly 200 respondents who have pursued one
or more resource-use activities during the last year in remote areas
of the Susitna study region.
The need for such large samples precluded consideration of face-to-
face interviews except where absolutely necessary.A well-designed
survey involving exclusively face-to-face interviews would require
'the development of a sample frame,including the listing of
'households,and repeated contacts at selected households to locate
~espondents.Just the field costs of such a survey would cost in
'excess of $300,000,a price not worth the additional reliability
--------.--.----.~."---g~aIned-by askrng-~some -"types----of -que-stIons-·f~ice=·to--f-ace--rather----tli"i:in
over the telephone.In fact,the only benefit of face-to-face
interviews in the present study would have been the opportunity to
present maps to respondents when asking for location information.
Carefully worded questions minimized this problem.
2 •3 F·EAS-I-B-I-I.IT¥0F G0NDUGTING TEI.EPH0NE INTE-R-V-I-Et..JS
,Aside from the limitation on the use of maps during the interview,
the only other limitation of telephone interviews was incomplete
.residential ..telephone coverage.Based .on statistics compiled .by
local telephone companies and the most recent census counts,
telephone coverage is generally excellent in the study area and
Copper River/Wrangell regions.An estimated 98 percent of all
households in Anchorage and Fairbanks have residential telephone
8
'(
)
:-1
it
"J
.~
, I
l
1
\
I.!service.In the remaining areas,available data indicated that
approximately 96 percent of all households in the Palmer-Wasilla
area,Talkeetna,Glennallen,Tok,and Valdez had residential
telephone service in early 1985.Telephone coverage in both urban
areas and in or near small towns was thus clearly adequate to
support a valid telephone survey.
Telephone coverage in rural areas of the study area and the Copper
River/Wrangell regions was somewhat lower,although rapidly
increasing.Seventy-five percent of all rural households in these
areas were initially estimated to possess residential telephone
service.Since one of the study's objectives was to describe
differences in resource use among urban,small town,and rural
populations,the level of rural telephone coverage was not adequate
to justify an exclusive reliance on telephone contacts .as a survey
mode.
2.4 SURVEY APPROACH SELECTED
Based on the above considerations.the method of choice was actually
a combination of telephone and face-to-face interviews.Telephone
interviews were conducted in all target areas and supplementary
sample of households lacking telephone service was used to properly
represent rural areas.
9
10
,::1
l
-----~----
J
;
-----~----------~-~------------------~-------------,-~---~---------\
)
I 'I
'l
I
'->\
J
3.0 SURVEY POPULATIONS
3.1 DETERMINATION OF TARGET POPULATION
The objectives of the study required the development of information
that could be generalized to the segment of the study area
population whose resource use activities could be affected by the
Susitna Hydroelectric Proj ect.Theoretically,the maximum size of
this target population was the state population as a whole.
Residents from southeastern,northern,and western Alaska
conceivably occasionally engage in resource use activities in the
southcentral region.However,use levels in the Susitna Basin among
these populations is extremely low.Their inclusion in the study's
target population would have consumed project resources that
otherwise could have been used to describe use levels and
characteristics of populations which more actively use resources
near the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.
At the other extreme,restriction of the target population to the
area containing the most active Susitna area resource users would
result in an underestimation of total resource use.The extent of
underestimation would,of course,be unknown.It was therefore
desirable to adopt a relatively broad definition of the target
population while still excluding Alaska resident populations that
clearly are marginal resource users in the area of interest.The
study's target population included the following areas:
I
j
•
•
•
The Anchorage Municipality
The Matanuska-Susitna Borough
Valdez north on the Richardson Highway to the Copper
River Basin
11
The Copper River Basin,including households located
within a mile to the east of the Richardson Highway,
north on the Richardson and Tok cutoff to Delta
Junction and Tok
•The Alaska Highway west from Tok
I )
J
l
•
•
The Fairbanks North star Borough
The Parks Highway south of the Fairbanks North star
Borough to the Matanuska-Susitna Borough
The Denali Highway and all other areas wi thin the
Parks,Glenn,Richardson,and Alaska highways
The area west of the Parks highway and east of the
Alaska Range,south of the Petersville Road to (but
not including)Tyonek on the Cook Inlet
J
I
Figure 3-1 delineates the geographic boundaries for the target
population.Within thisarea,all households were included in the
target population.Military service members living on-base in the
study target population were included since they are commonly active
resource users.
3.2 IDENTIFICATION OF SUBPOPULATIONS
Previous research on Alaska resident resource use potentially
affected by the Susitna Hydroelectric Project by the Power Authority
and the Subsistence Division·of the ADF&G has focused on rural
._...._..__PQPtJlc:l.t.J.c)Jl,l:l...Abe ...l:lpel:::i.a!l:::irl:::tJ'ffil:lt.c:l.tlcel:lanQJ....el:lQtJI."l:::I:.LJ:ll:lepat.t.ernsot'
------'rura-l--res-ident-s-c-learl-y-warrant-t-he-identi·f-icat-ion-of-rura-l-------
residents as a special subpopulation for reporting purposes.At the
same time,it was recognized that residents of the relatively large
population centers of Anchorage and Fairbanks differ from other
population groups in circumstances and resource use patterns ,and
should also be treated as a subpopulation.It was therefore decided
that three subpopulations would be used for reporting purposes:
urban,small town,and rural.
12
J
\
}
i
l
Figure 3-1
Susitna Hydroelectric Project .'
Susitna Resource User Survey Study Boundaries
•Households located along both sides of
boundary highways are included in study
areas.
Institute of Social and Economic Research.1985
D Stu.dv Area·...
r::::::::t Study Region~(included in study area)
N
Scale 0 LI
I
__......1__....,150
miles
Skwentna
13
Th~distinction between small town and rural subpopulations cannot
be validly made on the basis of population size within incorporated
boundaries.Communities such as Glennallen are not incorporated,
while much of the area outside the cities of Palmer and Wasilla is
clearly more urban than rural in character.The most valid approach
was to define the small town subpopulation by residence in or near
the following settlements:Palmer,Wasilla,Houston,Willow,
Talkeetna,Nenana,Clear,Cantwell,Anderson,Healy,Delta Junction,
Tok,Glennallen,and Valdez.Rural was therefore defined as all
areas outside the above-named small towns and not part of the
Anchorage Municipality or the Fairbanks North star Borough.
3.3 GENERALIZATION TO INDIVIDUALS VS.HOUSEHOLDS
The alternatives of generalizing survey results to individuals or to
households were considered,and the latter was chosen for over-
whelming practical reasons.If individuals were randomly sampled,
and information was obtained only about the sampled individual's
resource use activity,the resource-user data base would likely have
...--~b-een~·l~e-s-s-tn~ln--narf-t:ne~srie-~n-:i-s:-!r,on the other hand,each
respondent was asked to report on the resource use activities of
each individual household member,it would have been necessary to
collect detailed informatIon on·the household composition of each
resource use incident and necessary to obtain financial and personal
characteristics information concerning each household member.
Given the number of separate resource use activities to be covered
in the survey,the potential benefits associated with adopting the
individual as the reporting unit were outweighed by the lowered
response rates and increased meastJrem.E,mt errors as.sociat~d.with a
longer,more complicated interview.
14
.J
1
J
1.1
I
J
}
3.4 SELECTION OF RESPONDENT
Since the survey results were to be generalized to households,the
respondent selected in each household reported resource u~e
information pertaining to any household member.Thus,it is not
possible to determine which specific members of the household
participated.To minimize measurement errors,it was important that
the respondent be the person best informed about the resource use
activities of the entire household.The most straightforward way of
identifying this p~rson was to ask the adult first contacted to
identify the individual household member who he or she believed to
be the most knowledgeable about hunting,fishing,or other outdoor
recreation activities.The interviewer then arranged to interview
that person.
15
.J
================--------_..__.__._--_._____.._.___---__.-.\
.\
)
16
4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF STUDY REGION
Conceptually.the study region of interest is defined by the area in
which resource uses occur that may be affected by the Susitna
Project.New roads and the lakes created by the Susitna Project may
increase access to areas now only accessible by air.or even create
opportunities for new forms of resource use in some areas.These
changes could redistribute or even expand the total amount of
resource use in the state as a whole.Thus.the limits of the study
region theoretically correspond to the boundaries of the state of
Alaska.At the other extreme.relatively small areas would be
directly affected by the construction and operation of each project
facility such as the darns.reservoirs.and access road.
To properly reflect both the upper and lower extremes of the
definition of the study region.study area residents were asked to
report levels of resource use in the state as a whole and in a set
of 14 analysis areas collectively referred to in this report as the
study region.The study region is defined by two areas:(1)the
area bounded by the Denali.Richardson.Glenn.and Parks Highways
(containing analysis areas 1-12);and (2)the area bounded by the
Parks Highway on the east and a line drawn north from Tyonek on the
west to Petersville Road (containing analysis areas 13 and 14)(see
Figure 3-1).
The study region is considerably larger than the area likely to
experience significant project-related effects and was easy to
describe to respondents in either face-to-face or telephone inter-
views.With the exception of the two analysis areas (numbers 13 and
14)located outside the Glenn.Parks.Denali.and Richardson highway
area.all analysis units were constructed to be consistent with the
recently designed Alaska Department of Fish and Game Uniform Coding
Units.They represent aggregations of ADF&G subunits and are
designed to:
17
•Clearly identify the Susitna Project's reservoir zone
•Differentiate remote from road-based resource uses
•Have clearly identified boundaries that could be
easily communicated by telephone
The ADF&G Uniform Coding System units used to construct the analysis
areas are shown in Table 4-1.Four of the analysis areas are of
particular interest in this study.Area 10 closely matches the
proposed inundation zone.Portions of areas 11 and 12 would be
opened up to road-based resource use following the Project
construction phase.Area 1 contains the Susitna River reach most
likely to experience downstream effects on salmon stocks.
In addition to identifying 14 analysis areas within the study
region,7 analysis areas were identified outside the study region.
These areas are illustrated in Figure 4-1 and described below:
(1)Area 10 miles north of the Denali Highway and south of
the Alaska Range
'-'~-cn --Kenai p'erlinsula
(3)Anchorage/Chugach Mountains
(4)Copper River/Wrangell/Valdez
(5)Southeast Alaska
(7)Outside of Alaska
18
j
\
1
1
I
'1
I )
\
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4-1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
COMPOSITION OF ANALYSIS AREAS*
Area 1:Parks North
Game Management Unit (GMU)13E:101,102,201, 202,801,1001,
3003,1101,1501.
Area 2:Parks South
GMU 14A:
GMU 14B:
Area 3:Glenn
GMU 13A:
GMU 130:
GMU 14A:
101,303.
401,501.601,701,801,901.
1001, 1002, 1101, 1201,1301.1302,1303.
1701, 1801,2301.
501,502,503,601,701,801,802, 803. 804.901,
1001,1101.
Area 4:Talkeetna Mountains
GMU 13A:
GMU 13E:
GMU 14B:
901,1401,1501, 1701,1801,1803, 1805,1806.
1201, 1202,1301,1302,1303,1401, 1801,2201. 2202,
2203.
101,201,301,1001.
Area 5:Lake Louise Flats
GMU 13A:
GMU 13B:
801,1802,2001,2002, 2101.2102, 2103.~104.
101.
Area 6:Glenn East
GMU 13A:
GMU 130:
101,201,301,401,501,502.601.701.702,703.
1201,1501,1602.
Area 7:Richardson
GMU 13B:1102,'1401,1402. 1701,1703,1704, 1801.1802.
*This table describes the composition of this study's geographic
analysis areas in terms of ADF&G game management units and uniform
coding units.
19
Area 11:Deadman
Area 9:Denali East
I
\
I!
\
j
'I
.~
I
I
I
\
)
I
\
1601-
201-
1701,1702,1703,2301,2401.
GMU 13A:
GMU 13B:
GMU 13E:
Part of GMU 16B as far west as old Tyonek and as far north as
Petersville Road.
GMU 13B:301,302,303,304,401,402,403,404,501,502,
601,1201,1202,1602,1603.
GMU 13E:2601, 2602,2902,2903,3201,
3202.
GMU 13B:1403, 1501,1601.
GMU 13E:1601, 1901,2001,2101,2102,2402,2501.
Area 8:Alphabet Hills
TABLE 4-1 (Cont.)
Area 12:Denali West
Area 10:Susitna
Area 13:Sustina West
Area 14:Big Lake
SOURCE:A Uniform Coding System (UCS)for Hunter Harvest Data in
Alaska..1984.Alaska Department of Fish and Game Game
Division.
I.~,
20
i~·~--
N.....
,'tfc'1~'b ~"""-0
~
••,d ••Q
~
;p'p<>3
Scale
6
Of:>
t
N
o I Jmiles 1350
~2
3
4
5
6
7
Figure 4-1·
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
nalysis Areas Outside Susitna Study Region
Institute of Social and Economic Research,1985
·\
\)
\I
j
-------~-~-=-==--===-===~~-\
22
5.0 SAMPLE DESIGN
5.1 DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE
An estimated 2,000 urban,1,700 small-town,and 670 rural interviews
were required to meet the objectives of this study.Since a primary
objective of the study was to estimate the number of people using
resources in areas within or near the Susitna project area,it was
necessary to generate highly reliable sample estimates of use which
could be applied to the three study subpopulations:urban,small
town,and rural.It was assumed that observed levels of use would
be low.
A sample of 2,000 urban households enabled the estimation of the
population size of the user groups involving only two percent of the
urban population to within 650 households at a level of confidence
of 95 percent for an estimated total of 106,000 urban households.
The same size sample also produced adequate subsamples of urban
resource users by type of resource use.This size sample permitted
an analysis of user group characteristics.The same sampling logic
was applied to the small town and rural strata to calculate required
sample sizes.The resulting sample sizes were smaller due to the
effect of the finite population correction factor (Moser and Kalton,
1972).
5.2 TELEPHONE SAMPLE DESIGN
The urban telephone sample frame included all prefixes in the
Anchorage Municipality and the Fairbanks North Star Borough
(including prefixes for the military bases).An urban sample of
numbers sufficient to yield approximately 2,000 completed interviews
was generated.The size of each prefix sample was proportional to
23
the number of residential telephone numbers in the prefix.Since
the probability of any urban household being selected was equal,the
urban sample is representative without the application of differ-
ential interview weights among urban interviews.
The remaining prefixes in the study area covered both small town and
rural areas.The number of sampled households in each prefix was
proportional to the number of residential telephone numbers in the
prefix.The split of small town and rural interviews was achieved
by asking respondents to identify the physical location of their
residence and sorting completed interviews by location.The location
of small town coding categories are shown in Table 5-1.Rural
coding categories cover all remaining areas except the Anchorage
Municipality and the Fairbanks North Star Borough.
Actual sample elements were drawn randomly.A sampled telephone
number could not be replaced until its disposition was resolved to
be either:(1)a completed interview,(2)a refusal,(3)a nonworking
number,(4)a business number,(5)a number not answered or
continuously busy after callbacks repeated over at least four days
in both daytime and evening hours,or (6)a household in which there
was no eligible respondent (e.g.,a motel room).The response rate
was determined by the number of completed interviews divided by the
sum of completed interviews,refusals,and nonanswered numbers.
The final research design called for the development of the rural
nontelephone sample frame immediately prior to the commencement of
face......to......face interviewing;··...Estimates of the humber --of nousenolds
lacking residential telephone service .were ··firs·t .developed by···
comparing 1984 Mat-Su Borough housing counts and 1980 U.S.Census
housing counts ·with telephone company reports of residential
telephone numbers and census data on the incidence of telephone
24
1
.lj
I I
TABLE 5-1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
CODING CATEGORIES FOR SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
(1)Palmer area,defined by Glenn Highway milepost (mp)35 to
mp 49
(2)Wasilla area,defined by Parks Highway mp 35 to mp 45
(3)Palmer/Wasilla area including Bogard Road and Palmer/Wasilla
Highway
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
I 1
I !(8)
(9)
Houston area,defined by Parks Highway mp 56 to mp 58
Willow area,defined by Parks Highway mp 67 to mp 72
Talkeetna,including the northern 2 miles of the Talkeetna
Spur Road
Nenana,Anderson,Healy,Cantwell,and Clear on Parks
Highway
Delta Junction,defined by Alaska Highway mp 96 to mp 100
Tok area,defined by Alaska Highway mp 204 to mp 208
(10)Glennallen area,defined by Glenn Highway mp 175 to
Junction with Richardson Highway
(11)Valdez area,defined by Richardson Highway mp 0 to mp 25
25
service by census enumeration district.While these data were the
best available,they proved to be of limited value.Telephone
service has rapidly expanded throughout the study area in the last
two years,and the most recent data available did not accurately
reflect this expansion.In addition,housing and telephone
information was not available for geographic units that were
sufficiently small to create sample clusters.
In view of the above-mentioned limitations,sample quotas were
constructed for 17 geographical areas based on the best available
estimates of the number of households lacking telephone service in
each area.Quotas were not strictly proportional to these
estimates;rather,areas that are along the Parks and Glenn highways
and in the Copper River Basin were oversampled.These areas were
most·likely to contain·residents ..who use the Susitna study region.
Had quotas been strictly proportional to population,most of the
face-to-face interviews would have taken place along the Alaska
Highway,particularly in the Tok and Delta Junction areas.The
sample design quotas for the seventeen areas appear in Table 5-2.
The 17 areas identified above were too large to permit direct
sampling of households.Further work was necessary to ensure that
all interviews were not conducted in one or two locations within
each of the 17 areas.Interviewers were therefore directed to
contact linemen and others potentially familiar with the
------------distr-ibution-o£-househQlds_lacking_t~l~p_h~n~~-~rvicewithin each of
the 17 areas.Interviewers were instructed to form sample clusters
of seven-to-ten households per cluster and to then pick enough
clusters to meet the interview quota for each area.This approach
was designed to minimize the chances that the particular sample of
households in each area would be unrepresentative of all households
in the area.
26
,I
TABLE 5-2
SUSITNA RESOURCE USER SURVEY
PROJECTED AND ACTUAL INTERVIEWS FOR NONTELEPHONE SAMPLE*
Projected Actual
Parks Highway
A Clear,Healy,McKinley,Denali Highway,
Cantwell (excluding Anderson)
B North of Talkeetna,Alaska RR,to Summit
C Greater Peters Creek
D Greater Talkeetna
E Roadless Areas,non-RR Areas of Talkeetna
Mountains and Susitna River
F Greater Montana
G Point MacKenzie
H Hatcher Pass
Parks Highway Subtotal
10 10
8 7
13 15
20 25
16 6
21 19
0 4
-l ~
91 90
IJ
Glenn,Alaska,and Richardson Highways
I Sutton 7 7
J Chickaloon 5 8
K Matanuska Glacier Area 6 10
L Glenn Highway to Glennallen (4 in Glennallen
and 8 West of Glennallen)12 9
M Lake Louise 3 \ 7
N Greater Copper Center 8 8
o Greater Gulkana and Gakona 10 3
P Greater Paxson (Delta Junction to Gulkana)13 13
Q Chistochina,Slana,Mentasta Lake 2 2
R Greater Big Delta and Delta Junction
(Excluding Fort Greely)9 9
S Greater Tok,Tanacross,o Dot Lake 3 3
Glenn,Alaska,and Richardson Highways Subtotal 78 79
Totals for Entire Nontelephone Sample 169 169
*Letters in table correspond to areas shown in Figure 6-1.
27
In executing their instructions,interviewers frequently observed
that key informants could not provide highly reliable information on
the distribution of households lacking telephone service.Infor-
mants'perceptions simply have not kept pace with the rapid
expansion of telephone service and interviewers frequently observed
that households identified by informants to be without telephone
service had recently obtained such service.The lack of reliable
information made it difficult for interviewers to construct sample
clusters without actually contacting every household in the area to
determine if they should be included in the cluster of households
without telephones.In areas where it was possible to form sample
clusters,interviewers did so.In other areas,interviewers
frequently stopped for local information and selected isolated
households found to lack telephone service.
While the approach to sampling households without telephones was not
ideal,it capitalized on all available information and included
sufficient safeguards to ensure that the sample is broadly
representative.Recent expansions in telephone coverage produced an
.excellent ..rural telephone sample-;-The -combined-telephone-and
face-to-face rural samples provided a sound basis for developing
resource use estimates for rural residents.
28
'\
I,)
I
)
],
1 1
I j
IJ
6.0 SURVEY ADMINISTRATION
The telephone fieldwork phase of the study took place between
Febru~ry 15,1985,and April 20,1985.One-hundred-and-six
telephone interviewers were used during the eight-week period of the
survey.Interviewers were trained in the objectives of the study,
general interviewing techniques,and specific interviewing
procedures required to perform this study.Each interviewer
performed several practice interviews prior to receiving their first
sample assignment.Two supervisors monitored interviewer
performance at a centralized interviewing facility and edited
interviews as they were completed.Supervisors instructed
interviewers to call back respondents for any missing information.
In addition,supervisors verified 10 percent of all completed
interviews.The overall response rate to the telephone survey was
70 percent.
The face-to-face component of the survey commenced February 27,
1985,and finished April 20,1985.Interviewers had to first obtain
information on the location of households lacking telephone service
from key informants and personal observation.Once they developed a
general idea of the number and distribution of such households,
interviewers used a variety of methods to locate and contact
respondents.These methods included travel by train,snow machine,
skiis,dog sled,and automobile.Some residents of remote areas
were interviewed opportunistically as they traveled on or along the
Alaska Railroad or in town.
The face-to-face interviewers encountered a higher refusal rate
(approximately 20 percent)among the most remote portion of the
nontelephone sample (e.g.Peters Creek)than among other populations
sampled in the survey.As a result,the number of completed
29
interviews in the roadless areas accessed from the Parks Highway was
lower than expected.However,this problem was alleviated by
increasing the size of the remote sample near Talkeetna and by
including a sample of Point MacKenzie residents.The interview
totals by area appear in Table 5-2 above.Figure 6-1 illustrates
the distribution of rural nontelephone comp~eted interviews.
Tables 6-1 through 6-4 display sample sizes for major subpopu-
lations,locations,and activities.Also shown are the maximum
estimated standard errors.Standard er;rors are an expression of the
error that results from the fact that survey findings are based on a
sample of households rather than on all households.Actual standard
errors vary according to the variation in population characteristics
and according to the size of the sample.All standard error
estimates shown·in Tables ·6-1 through 6-"4·assume ma:loCimum variation
in responses.The estimates provide a standardized indicator of the
relative reliability of information for.each major subpopulation/
location/activity combination.
30
:-\
I
'---'---
~usitl1a HYciroelectric Project
Rural Non-Phone Sampling Areas
Nt
o I ,.150
miles
STEPHEN R.BRAUND &ASSOCIATES 1985
Figure 6-1
• =Single interview
,,
,
...
-.'.
"I
/
I
I
I-...'",--Q.
I
,
.0 ...........
4/qs,L:,
"q L~,
•17{qh~~
R
I
I
I,
\
--.,
I
lake'
loui~e
I _\._..'\,-'"--'
,-:.--...'tl\,llla'!
I I Gle llll Hi9
I,,
I
I
I,,
I
\
\
\
\
t
J
.J
/'
/
/
//6
/
/~~.Y-
.»."\.\.\'g ,I',.".\*:"'./\
<f '.\I ,,
E :,
/
/
/
\.,
OJ....
Table 6-1
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMPLING ERRORS
BY SUBPOPULATION
HOUSEHOLDS EFJ:ECIIIJE MAXIMUM
SAMPLE STANDARD
SIZEIt ERROR
ALL HOUSEHOLDS 122753 5016 0.7i.
URBAN 106215 2138 1.1%
SMALL TOWN 13878 1993 1.17-
RURAL 2660 885 1.77.
*The effective sample size is the actual sample size
adjusted by the finite population correction factor.
32
I
I
II
j
\
i
I
1
\
I I
( I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 6-2
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMPLING ERRORS
BY GROUPED ANALYSIS AREAS
ALL ACTIV II IES HUNTING
Sample Ih:dmum Sample Ma>:imufii
Size Standard Size Standard
ALL HOUSEHOLDS Error Error
Study Region Remote **1,256 1.4%336 2.77-
Study Region Nonremote 5,492 0.77-787 1.8%
Elsewhere Remote 260 3.1%75 5.3%
Elsewhere Non-remote 1,599 1.3%163 3.9~
[
~j URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Study Region Remote 422 2.4%107 4.3%
Study Region Nonremote 2,513 1.0%297 2.97-
Elsewhere Remote 139 4.2%30 9.lZ
Elsewhere Non-remote I9981.6%70 6.0%
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
StUdy Region Remote 341 2.7%108 4.3%
StUdy Region Nonremote 2,339 1.0%387 'l C".,,..,;1.
Elsewhere Remote 94 5.2%29 9.37.
Elsewhere Non-remote 512 2.2%58 6.6i.
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
Study Region Remote 493 2.3%121 4.5%
Study Region Nonremote 640 2.0%103 4.9%
Elsewhere Remote 27 9.6%16 12.5%
Elsewhere Non-remote 89 5.3%35 8.57.
**Remote refers to areas that cannot be accessed by road.
33
I
.1
Table 6-2 (Cont.)
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMPLING ERRORS
BY GROUPED ANALYSIS AREAS
:(.FISHING NONCONSUMPIIIJE
SaMple Maximum Sample Ma>:imum
Size Standard Size Standard
ALL HOUSEHOLDS Error Error
Study Region Remote :(.:(.523 2.2%397 2.5%Study Region Nonremote 1,759 1.2%2,942 0.97-
Elsewhere Remote 77 5.7%107 4.8i.
Elsewhere Non-remote 411 2.5%1,024 1.G%
f
\
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Study Region Remote
____Study__Region Nonremote
Elsewhere Remote
Elsewhere Non-remote
216
783
42
230
7.77.
3.3%
99 5.07-
1,433 ---L3L
67 6.1i.
698 1.9i.
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
StUdy Region Remote 150 4.1%83 5.5%
Study Region Nonremote 746 1.8%1,203 1.4%_
----------Usewn-e-re-Reii!ote--'-"-33 -8:77.32 8.3i.
------E1sewnere Non-remote--------------T67..,..--3~9r 2a7--3~0i.---~------
34
I
*NonconslJll1)tive activities include:use of sunmer and winter off-road
vehicles,skiing,snowshoeing,dogsledding,boating,camping,backpacking,
hiking,picnicking,berry picking,photography,and sightseeing.
**Remote refers to areas that cannot be accessed by road.
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
Study Region Remote
StUdy Region Nonremote
Elsewhere Remote
Elsewhere Noh~relote
157 4.0%
230 3.31-
2 35.4%
1413~4i.
215
30G
a
39
3.4%
2;9i.
17.77.
8~0i....-I \
, I
"1
I
\r
-,
Table 6-3
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMPLING ERROR
B'(·RESOURCE USE
ALL HOUSEHOLD
REMOTE NON-REMOTE
SAMPLE MAXIMUM SAMPLE MAXIMUM
SIZE STANDARD SIZE STANDARD
ERROR ERROR
HIJnting J(-408 2.5%949 1.67-
Moose H'Jnting 190 3.6%424 2.47-
Caribou HIJnting 54 G.8i.107 4.87.
Sheep or Goat Hunting 29 9.3%30 9.li.
Brown Bear Hunting 22 10.7%:n 10.9%
Black Bear Hunting 21 9.6%61 6.47.
Small Game Hunting 83 5.57-303 2.97-
Fishing 599 2.0%2170 1.1;'
Salmon Fishing 311 2.87.1086 1.5;!
King Salmon Fishing 123 4.5%362 2.67.
Silver Salmon Fishing 127 4.47-432 2.4~
Red Salmon Fishing 36 8.3i.205 3.5%
Other Salmon Fishing 20 11.27-81 5.67-
Rainbow Trout Fishing 103 4.9%416 2.5%
Dolly Varden Fishing 24 10.27-130 4.4%
Lake Trout Fishing 27 9.6%89 5.37.
Other Trout Fishing 8 l7.7X 19 11.5i.
Grayling Fishing 88 5.3i.348 2.77-
Bourbot or Cod Fishing 34 8.Gi.73 5.9%
Summer off Road 57 6.6i.220 3.4i.
Winter Off Road 80 5.6%248 3.21.
Skiing 69 6.0%527 2.2;'
Motorboating 53 6.97.471 2.3%
Canoe;Raft,Kayak 15 12.9%207 3.57.
Other I!o.3ting 1 50.07.31 9.0%
Backpacking 46 7.4%193 3.67-
Tent Camping 28 9.47.178 3.71.
Rec Vehicle Camping 2 35.4%85 5.4%
Other Camping 5 22.47-14 13.4%
Hiking,Picnicking 75 5.8%831 1.n:
Sightseeing 75 5.8%958 1.67.
*A few individuals did not specify which type of hunting and fishing they
did.Therefore.the addition of specific activity numbers do not always equal
category totals.
35
Table 6-4
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMPLING ERROR
BY RESOURCE USE
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
REMOTE NON-REMOTE
SAMPLE MAXIMUM SAMPLE MAXIMUM
SIZE STANDARD S·lZE STANDARIi
ERROR ERROR
H'Jnting :to 137 0.07-367 2.67-
Moose Huntins 61 6.4%161 3.97-
Caribou H'Jnting 26 9.87-37 8.27-
Sheep or Goat Huntins 9 16.7%14 13.47.
Brown Bear Hunting 10 15.87.11 15.1%
Black Bear Hunting 7 18.9%20 11.27.
Small Game Hunting 24 10.27.122 4.5i.
FishinS 258 3.1%1013 1 ,.•,.b/.
Salmon Fishing 154 4.07.531 2.27-
King Salmon Fishing 70 6.07.la6 387i~
Silver Salmon Fishing 56 6.77.198 3.67-
Red Salmon Fishing 15 12.9%105 4.97-
Other Salmon Fishing 8 17.77.37 8.27.
Rainbow Trout Fishing 42 7.77.179 3.77-
Dolly_V.;l1'denFish ing 22.47._54 __6.ai.-_._--_._---~.._~_..__........__•.._._.-
Lake Trout Fishing 14 13.47.46 7.4%
Other Trout Fishing 2 35.4i.13 13.97-
Grayling Fishing 32 ,8.8%148 4.16:
Bourbot or Cod Fishing,6 20.47-34 8.67-
Summer off Road 20 11.2%lOa 4.8%
Winter Off RO.3d 18 11.87.no 4.87-
Skiing 8 17.7i.295 2.9%
Motorboating 26 9.8i.233 3.37-
~-""-'-"-'----~~'"-"-'"--------Car;o-e,Raft-,-KayaK-..---.._.._.._..--5---.....----22.47.'"..-----"1'05 ·_-..-..-.f~..9%..---.._._,-"._-----_._-----_."-,,_.,--"._._._..,--_.._~----_.-~-,---,-_._------..---~~-~..__.._-
Other-Boating 1--50-;0%18--1"l--;8i.
Backpacking 11 15.17.113 4u7k
Tent C.'3Mpin9 13 13.9i.101 5.0%
Rac Vehicle Camping 1 50.0%51 7.0%
Other Campin9 2 35.4%8 17.n
Hiking,Picnicking 21 10.9%453 2.3%
Sightseeing 40 7,,9%536 ·'2.2%
*A few individuals did not specify which type of hunting and fishing they
did.Therefore,the addition of specific activity numbers do not always equal
category totals.
36
{('
1
.')
,\
I.
'I
l
"~
./
,I
>.l/\
,I.,
Table 6-5
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMPLING ERROR
BY RESOURCE USE
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
REMOTE NON-REMOTE
SAMPLE MAXIMUM SAMPLE MAXIMUM
SIZE STANDARD SIZE STANDARD
ERROR ERROR
H'Jnting )(.136 4.3%445 2.4%
Moose Huriting 69 6.0I 213 3a4i~
C.~ribou H'Jnting 16 12.5%48 7.2i.
Sheep or Goat Hunting a 17.77-14 13.4%
Brown Bear Hunting 9 16.n:7 18.97-
Black Bear Hunting 9 16.7%26 9.8%
Small Game Hunting 22 10.n 136 4.3;{
Fishing 183 3.7%913 1.77.
Salmon Fishing 98 0.0%436 2.4A:
King Salmon fishing 33 8.7%138 4.37-
Silver Salmon Fishing 48 7.2%190 3.6;~
Red Salmon fishinq 12 14.47-79 5.0%
Other Salmon Fishing 5 22.4%28 9.47.
Rainbow Trout fishing 27 9.67.196 3.6%
Dolly Varden fishing 7 18.97.52 6.9i.
Lake Trout fishing 11 15.1%35 8.5%
Other Trout fishing 1 50.0%6 20.4i.
Grayling Fishing 29 9.3%158 4.0i.
Bourbot or Cod Fishing 9 16.77.29 9.3%
Summer off Road 21 10.91.%5.1%
Winter Off Road 25 10.07.109 4.8i.
Skiing 2 35.47.1%3.6X
Motorbo.~ting 15 12.91.185 3.n
Canoe,Raft,Kayak 4 25.07-77 5.?%
Other Boating 0 0.07.10 15.8?
Backpacking 7 18.9%65 6.27-
Tent Camping 11 15.1%63 6.3i.
Rec Vehicle Camping 0 0.07.25 10.07.
Other Camping 0 0.07.4 25.0i.
Hiking,Picnicking 15 12.97.297 2.9i.
Sightseeing 16 12.57.366 2.67.
*A few individuals did not specify which type of hunting and fishing they
did.Therefore,the addition of specific activity numbers do not always equal
category totals.
37
Table 6-6
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED SAMf'LINGERRIJR
BY RESOURCE USE
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
REMOTE NON-REMOTE
SAMPLE MAXIMUM SAMPLE MAXIMUMSIZESTANDARDSIZESTANDARD
ERROR ERROR
Hunting ¥135 4.3%137 4.3i.Hoose Hunting 60 6.5%SO 7.17.C:uibolJ H'Jntins 12 14.4%22 lO.nSheeporGoatHunting1214.4%,.,35.4%...Brown Bear Hunting 3 28.9%3 28.97.Black Bear Hunting 11 15.1i.IS 12.9i.Small Game Hunting 37 8.2%4S 7.5%fishing IS8 4.0%244 3.2~S·31moo Fishing 59 6.5i.119 4.6%King Salmon Fishing 20 11.2%38 S.U:Silver Salmon Fishing 23 10.4%44 7.5:<:
Red Salmon fishing 9 16.7%21 10.9i.Other Salmon Fishing 7 18.9%16 12.5%
Rainbow Trout fishing 34 8.6%41 7.8%----DoHyVarden .Fishing .··12--·t·t;-4%24 lO~2i.-
Lake Trout Fishing 2 35.4i.8 17.7;~
Other Trout Fishing 5 22.47-0 0.0i.Grayling Fishing 27 9.6%42 7.7"1.Bourbot or Cod Fishing 19 11.57-10 15.87-
Summer off Road 16 12.5%16 12.5%Winter Off Ito·3d 37 8.2%29 9.3%Skiing 59 6.5%36 8.3i.
Canoe,Raft,Kayak 6 20.4%25__10...07.
Other Boating 0 0.0%3 28.9i.
Backpacking 28 9.4i.15 12.9%Tent Camping 4 25.0%14 13.4%
Rec Vehicle Camping 1 50.0%9 16.7XOtherCamping328.9%2 35.4i.
Hiking,Picnicking 39 8.0%81 5.67.Sightseeitl9 19 11.5%56 6.7%
*A few individuals did not specify which type of hunting and fishing they
did.Therefore,the addition of specific activity numbers do not always equal
category totals.
38
fI
(
I \
!i
,"I
I
I,
I
7.0 QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN
Each interview was divided into three major sections.The first
section ascertained household resource use by type of use and by
location of use.The second section obtained information on two
selected resource use experiences.The third section determined
household characteristics relevant to resource use.The complete
.1
questionnaire is reproduced in reduced form in Exhibit A.The
actual process of designing the questionnaire involved the
preparation of a final study design;a review of this design by
Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture (Harza-Ebasco).ADF&G Su-Hydro,
ADF&G,and the Power Authority;the preparation of a draft
questionnaire;a review of the questionnaire by the ADF&G,ADF&G
Su-Hydro,U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Harza-Ebasco.and the
Power Authority;and pretests,followed by questionnaire revisions.
The pretests involved both intervi~ws with key informants selected
for their different patterns of resource use and telephone inter-
views with a random sample of Eagle River residents.Approximately
50 pretests were completed.
7.1 CATEGORIES OF RESOURCE USE
The categories of resource use covered by the survey were first
identified from personal experience by Jim Hemming and by reviewing
relevant references concerning resource use in the region defined by
the Denali,Richardson,Glenn,and Parks highways (ADF&G 1983;
Stratton 1982, 1983,1984;Stratton and Georgette 1984;Mills 1984;
Jubenville 1985).This set was reviewed by ADF&G,ADF&G Su-Hydro,
and Harza-Ebasco,and was subsequently modified to form the
following list of resource uses:
39
Hunting:moose,caribou,sheep,goat,brown bear,black
bear,ptarmigan and grouse,waterfowl,snowshoe hare,and
fur-bearer hunting or trapping.
I\ I
Fishing:king salmon,coho salmon,sockeye salmon,
salmon,pink salmon,rainbow trout,Dolly Varden,
trout,greyling,and burbot.
chum
lake
other Resource Uses:summer off-road vehicle use,winter
off-road vehicle use,cross-country skiing,snowshoeing,
dog sledding,wildlife and scenic photography,motor-
boating,kayaking,canoeing,rafting,backpacking,tent
camping,recreational vehicle camping,day hiking,pic-
nicking,berry picking,and sightseeing.
The first pretests of the questionnaire included all of the above
categories as separate resource uses;the interview length was found
to be excessive.To reduce the length of the interview,coho,
sockeye,chum,and pink salmon were grouped into th~s;ingle category
"other salmon";rainbow,dolly varden,and lake trout were grouped
into the single category "trout";motorboating,kayaking,canoeing,
and rafting were grouped into the single category "boating";and
backpacking,tent camping,and recreational vehicle camping were
grouped into the single category "backpacking-or-tent or
recreational vehicle camping";day hiking,picnicking,and berry
picking were grouped into the single category "day hiking,
picnicking,or berry picking";and skiing,snowshoing,and dog
sledding were grouped into a single category.
four activity groups (Le.salmon other tbao _
king salmon,trout,boating,or camping)was randomly selected for
more detailed questioning,respondents were asked which specific
activity with the activity group they had done.For example,if
"salmon other than king salmon"was selected,the relilp()tlc1Eltl.t.""as.
asked to identify whether the last trip was f()r coho,sock~ye,pink,
or chum salmon.
The above groupings reflected the researchers'best judgment
concerning the tradeoff between specificity and interview complexity
40
\ I
,I
,I
and length.It is important to recognize that the above categories
were not intended to be mutually exclusive since a single resource
use experience may combine two or more activities.All partici-
pation was recorded without distinguishing between primary and
incidental activities.In general,however,respondents appeared to
report primary activities.
~2 TIME PERIOD COVERED BY SURVEY
Given the seasonal nature of many resource use activities,the
shortest logical time period to be covered by the survey was twelve
months.The original research design provided for the collection of
information pertaining to both the most recent year and a specific,
longer time period in order to increase the number of resource users
identified.Pretesting of question formats indicated that the best
approach was:to adopt an unlimited time period and to ask the
respondent to'identify the last year that a member of the household
engaged in a given activity.This combination yielded comprehensive
information cbncerning annual and maximum participation rates (i.e.,
ever engaged in'a given resource use activity).
After respondents indicated the last year that anyone in their
household had engaged in each resource use activity,regardless of
time or pl,ace,interviewers described the study region and
determined which activities occurred within the study region.Any
activities occurring within the study region were then further
defined in terms of their location in one of the 14 analysis areas.
In cases of,multiple trips within the study region for any given
resource use,interviewers ascertained the primary use area on the
last trip.
Once respondents had indicated the last year that someone in their
household engaged in a given resource activity in the study region,
interviewers asked them to indicate the last year and last location
for the same activity outside the study region.In cases of
41
multiple trips outside the study region for any given resource use,
again interviewers ascertained the primary use area on the last
trip.Thus,reported use levels refer only to the last trip and
underestimate total use in any given time period to the extent that
multiple trips to different locations occurred.
7.3 SELECTED RESOURCE USE EXPERIENCES
Collection of information concerning the characteristics of the area
in which a resource use occurred and the activity itself was
necessary to estimate the value of the use to the user.Section two
of the interview obtained information about two selected resource
use experiences (see Table 7-1).
Ideally,it would ..have been preferable to obtain detailed informa-
tion for each resource use mentioned by the respondent.This was
clearly impossible given the technical constraints associated with a
personal interview.To maximize the amount of information obtained
about diverse forms of resource use,up to two separate resource use
experienceswereseTectea for-aetaileaquestionitfg.Ttf maximize the
amount of information obtained concerning the study region,uses
occurring in the study region were selected first.If no mentioned
activities occurred in the study region,uses occurring elsewhere
were selected.Computer-generated random numbers were used to
select activities.
7.4 COMPARISON OF USER CHARACTERISTICS
Collection of information concerning the characteristics of the
household was important for estimating values attached to resource
uses.The information collected is shown in Table 7-2.
42
,I
TABLE 7-1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
INFORMATION OBTAINED ABOUT
SELECTED RESOURCE USE EXPERIENCES
I
'.J
•
•
•
•
Total times engaged in activity in same area
Total times engaged in activity in study region (if
applicable)
Total times engaged in actiyity in same year as last
engagement
Mode of access used .to get to final destination (off-road
vehicle,highway vehicle,boat,air charter.horse,or
extended hike)
•Number of household members participating
•Total number of persons in party
•Total travel time from residence to final destination
•Total days during which activity took place (including
travel)
•Expenses incurred
•Amount of money willing to pay before household would
reduce frequency of participation
•Perceived characteristics of resource use area:
-ease of getting into area
-familiarity with area
-beauty of area
-lack of crowding in area
-ease of getting around in area
chance of getting desired experience in area
-cost of activity in area
-quality of places to stay or camp in in area
-family tradition of doing activity in area
-overall appeal of area
•Perceived qualities of best other area for same activity
•Ownership of land in area
43
•
•
•
TABLE 7-2
SUSTINA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
INFORMATION OBTAINED ON
CHARACTERISTICS OF RESOURCE USERS
Consumption of wild meat and fish as a percent of all meat
consumed
Reasons for living in community
-opportunity to get a job
-long-term economic opportunity
-chance to get away from urban problems
-challenging or exciting job
-being close to a wilderness environment
opportunity to earn a high income
-chance to be self-reliant
-being part 6f a small community
-nearby hunting and fishing
-nearby outdoor recreation opportunities
Education of respondent
\I
i \
I)
,I
1
(r
I
--I
')
•Number of wage earners in household
•Total number of months household members employed
•Household income
44
I,
I
,I
'\
,)
,J
"J
1
./
8.0 ANALYSIS DESIGN
As stated earlier,this study has four major objectives.These are
to (1)estimate the number and percentage of study area households
engaging in resource use activities in the study region;
(2)estimate the dollar value of locations for resource use
activities;(3)compare the attributes of alternative locations for
pursuing the same activity;and (4)compare and contrast the
economic circumstances of urban,small town,and rural resource
users as a means of estimating the relative value of resource use
activities.
8.1 LEVELS OF RESOURCE USE
Two tables were constructed for each of the 21 categories of
resource use covered in the first section of the questionnaire.The
.first table contains estimates of the percentage of households
engaging in each activity within each analysis area.The second
table contains estimates of the absolute number of households
engaging in each activity.A description of the rows and columns of
the 42 tables appears in Table 8.1.
Instead of producing point estimates of the percentage or absolute
number of 'households engaging in each activity,range estimates were
produced based on 95 percent confidence intervals.The best point
estimate in each case is the midpoint of the reported range.
8.2 ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUE OF RESOURCE USE ACTIVITIES
Recreational and personal uses of natural resources in the study
region produce economic returns to the regional and state economy
and produce personal benefits to resource users.This study focused
on the value of locations for various resource uses.Resource users
45
TABLE 8.1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
REPORTING CATEGORIES FOR LEVELS OF RESOURCE USE
,j
,I
:\
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Anywhere in or out of Alaska
Anywhere in Alaska
within the study region
Within Analysis Area One
within Analysis Area Two
within Analysis Area 14
Within area 10 miles north of Denali Highway
Within Anchorage/Chugach Mountain area
On Kenai Peninsula
Within Copper River/Wrangell/Valdez area
In Southeast Alaska
Elsewhere in Alaska
··············Outside of·Alaska······._-_.
COLUMN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ROW
1
2
3
4
5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.··24
TIME PERIOD COVERED
ever
1980-85
1984
ever
1980-85
1984
ever
1980-85
1984
ever
1980-85
1984
TARGET POPULATION
all households
all households
all households
urban households
urban households
urban households
small town households
small town households
small town households
rural households
rural households
rural households
46
\1
\j
often expend significant amounts of money to reach the locations
where they pursue their recreation and personal use activities,and
these expenditures reflect a lower bound on the value they attach to
these locations.Travel expenditures do not reflect the total value
of a location for resource use,however.Information on the value
of travel time and on perceived willingness to pay additional money
to engage in an activity at the chosen location was used in addition
to travel costs in order to approximate the total value of locations
for resource uses.Even these estimates do not reflect the value to
['Ural residents of having nearby locations for resource uses.The
economic circumstances of ['Ural,small town,and urban residents
were,therefore,compared as a means of indicating the extent·to
which ['Ural residents have foregone income in order to live nearby
resource use opportunities.
The first analysis step was to estimate the minimum value of a
single engagement in a given resource use or in a given geographic
area.Respondents were asked to report their total expenses getting
to the site where they began their last engagement in each activity.
These "out-of-pocket"travel costs constitute a minimum estimate of
the value a household placed on a particular geographic area for a
particular type of activity.
To avoid losing large numbers of observations due to the cumulative
effect missing data,individual missing values were assumed to equal
the mean or median,as appropriate,of the particular population
subgroup/activity combination applying to the variable.A
comparison of results with and without the allocation of missing
data indicated that the procedure was valid (i.e.,the results were
very similar).
Money is not the only resource expended when a trip is made to a
recreation site;time is also used.This time has value because it
can be used in other ways.An intermediate indicator of the value
47
of locations for resource uses was estimated by combining the
minimum value estimate described above with an estimate of the value
of time spent by the household traveling to the site where they
began the activity.Households are likely to travel longer periods
of time to reach more attractive sites.There are probably few
instances in which a household actually foregoes income (e.g.,a
wage-earner takes leave without pay)in order to take the time
necessary to travel to a site.In these instances,the foregone
income is actually part of the cost of engaging in an activity at a
particular site.Even time that is not normally work time has
value,however.Time can be used to do other activities or to go to
other recreation sites.
The use of travel time to estimate the value of a location for
resource use does not work as well for rural residents as it does
for urban residents.Many rural residents have made a one-time
location decision to live near favorable locations for resource
use.The value of these locations is ~ndirectly reflected in the
increased time they spend commuting to work or in the decreased
income"they earn.The finalcha.pter in this repo'rtpr'esertts da.ta.
which relates the value of resource use locations to differences in
economic circumstances resulting in part from residence location
decisions.
The best estimate of the value of the time spent traveling to a site
.'.__........".,...--,--.",.--.--........_...'.
______-"i.....s'----'d...,e""'ri v~d_f_r_Q.m_t_b..e_ay_e_t:age-ho.us-e.ho-l.d-w.age-.--T.ime-v.alue_was,_
estimated by multiplying round-trip travel time by the number of
wage earners estimated to be in the travel party by the estimated
average hourly wage for the household by 0.33.The household wage
was estimated by dividing reported household income by the estimated
number of hours worked by all household members.One-third of the
household wage rate was used rather than the entire household wage
rate because household members could not generally find additional
48
,j
I
.\
'\I
'I
j
work at their current wage rate.The one-third fraction is commonly
used in recreation and transportation economic studies (Cesario
1976),but it has no particular theoretical significance.
The intermediate value estimate described above probably under-
estimates the value of a single resource use engagement if the time
spent on the activity is constrained by competing time demands on
the resource user or limits on the availability of the resource.
That is,many resource users would probably spend more time and
money to engage in a given activity at a given location if it were
necessary to do so.It is easiest to conceive of this value as the
admission fee that resource users would pay to use the site.It is
necessary to infer the maximum amount users would pay from survey
responses since no entrance fee is actually charged.
Analysis of responses to reported willingness to pay indicated that
respondents generally did not interpret the question to mean the
amount they would pay before they reduced the frequency of
engagements by one;rather,response patterns showed that the figure
given more closely approximated the amount respondents would pay to
do an activity at all at a given location.The willingness to pay
for the last trip was thus estimated by dividing the reported
willingness to pay by the number of engagements reported for a given
activity/location combination.This figure was added to the
intermediate value described above to calculate a maximum value for
a single trip.As stated earlier,the maximum dollar value estimate
may still underestimate the total value of a location for a resource
use for rural residents who have chosen to live near resources even
though there are fewer economic opportunities in rural areas.
Low,medium,and high estimates of the mean value of single resource
use engagements can be compared across locations as an indication of
the relative quality of a particular type of resource use among
urban,small town,and rural resource users.To compare the value
49
of different types of resource uses,however,an additional
analytical step was necessary.Households tend to engage in some
types of resource uses multiple times during a year and to engage in
other types of resource uses only once a year.A comparison of
single engagement values across resource uses would therefore
underestimate the relative value of resource uses that are commonly
pursued multiple times.The value of all engagements specific to a
single activity and a single location was calculated by multiplying
the mean value for a single engagement times the reported number of
engagements.
Mean value estimates for single resource use engagements also do not
take into account variations in the number of resource users across
locations.Estimates of the aggregate value of each resource
activity in each analysis area was therefore calculated by
multiplying the mean value estimate for a single resource use
eng'agement times the number of engagements per household times the
estimated total number of resource users.
The:dorlarvalue analysis objectives would have been best met if it
were possible to report resource value information by detailed
activity,geographic location,and user group.Counting the
21 detailed activities,the 21 detailed geographic locations,and
the 3 user groups,this ideal approach would have yielded 1,764 sets
of resource value information.Each set would have consisted of a
.'.-,"~...~.__.._..,-._--_.__._,,_._.•._._._,,-.-.'-,--------_...--_.--,,-_..,._._--,._,._--_._-...--.._-._,-,----_.._..,~._.._....--_.'.._-._-.'._._.,-'.',.-_.'-.'_.__._--"_.-.~.._."._._---,_._--_._.,--------_._"----
_____~low,intermediate,and high value estimate.Aside from the E_r_o~b_l_e_m _
of information overload,this approach was impractical because there
was insufficient information to provide reliable estimates at such a
detailed level.Given the primary analysis objective of estimating
the value of resource use for areas likely to be directly affected
by the Susitna Project,mean and aggregate dollar value estimates
were calculated for six location groupings:
50
1\
-l
)
1
./
II.
•The potential inundation zone,Area 10
•The areas likely to receive improved access,Areas 11
and 12
•All other remote areas of the study region
•Nonremote areas of the study region
•All other remote areas
•All other nonremote areas
Mean dollar value estimates fo~Area 10 and fo~Areas 11 and 12 were
not based on the geographic location of the activity but rather on
the mode of access used th~oughout the study area.Resource use
activities were t~eated as remote if the final mode of t~anspor
tation used to get to the activity location was either airplane,
boat,off-road vehicle,ho~se,or--if a rural household--walking.
All other activities were treated as nonremote (except in the Big
Lake Area 14,in which all modes of access were t~eated as nonremote
activities).The same categorization system was used fo~activities
taking place outside the study region.The estimates for Area 10
and fo~Areas 11 and 12 are,therefo~e,equivalent to the mean
dollar value estimate for other remote areas of the study region.
The reason mode of access was used to define remote area activities
rather than geography was that the number of reported activities in
Areas 10, 11,and 12 was insufficient to p~ovide a reliable basis
for computing mean dollar estimates.since these areas cannot be
accessed by ~oad,the best alternative data base was the set of
activities in which the mode of access included airplane,boat,
off-road vehicle,horse,or--if a rural household--walking.The
choice of this analysis approach was based on the assumption that
mode of access accounts for most of the differences in the value of
activities in ~emote areas such as Areas 10, 11,and 12 and the
value of activities pursued in nonremote areas of the study region.
51
Mean dollar values for remote and nonremote areas outside the study
region were also calculated on the basis of the mode of access used ..
Mean and aggregate dollar estimates were produced for the study area
population as a whole for the following groupings of resource use
activities:all activities combined,all hunting activities,all
fishing activities,and all nonconsumptive activities.Comparable
estimates were produced .for urban,small t,own,and rural
subpopulations.
To provide a more detailed description of the dollar values
associated with the 21 specific resource uses covered by the survey,
the location groupings were collapsed to compare resource values in
the following groups:
•Remote areas of the study region
•Nonremote areas of the study region
•other remote areas
•Other nonremote areas
Activities were classified as either remote or nonremote by mode of
access used,as described earlier.Mean dollar values for single
engagements were calculated for urban,small town,and rural
populations as well as for the study area population as a whole.In
this case,it was not possible to produce aggregate value estimates
because estimates of resource use levels could not be calculated for
the location groupings as defined above.The question on mode of
access was asked only about,two reported activities,and the subset
of these activities occurring outside the study region cannot be
considered a random sample of non-Susitna activities.Susitna
activities were selected preferentially .for detailed questi(ming,
and households engaging in activities both in and out of the study
region may differ in the remote/nonremote distribution of their
52
j
II
/I
activities from households which only engage in activities outside
the study region.However,it was possible to multiply mean dollar
values for single engagements by the reported number of engagements
and thereby produce a set of mean dollar values for all trips to a
location for a given activity.
8.3 ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE VALUE OF RESOURCE USES
Estimation of the dollar value of resource use activities is
necessary if the value of different resource uses are to be
compared.The approach used in this study to estimate dollar values
of resource use activities does not,however,explain why one
particular activity/location combination is valued more than
another.If the reasons for relative attractiveness were
understood,the likelihood of protecting the overall attractiveness
of a location for a particular activity would be significantly
increased.Steps can be taken to protect and enhance resource
I I
i1·
IJ
values.If lack of crowding is a particularly important component
of the value attached to the use of a given area,for example,it
can be expected that improved access and subsequent increases in
resource use may significantly lower the quality of an area for
current resource users.
To provide an indication of the attributes contributing to overall
activity/location attractiveness,respondents were asked to rate the
quality of ten specific area attributes and the quality of the area
overall as a location for the reported activity.These specific
attributes included:
•Ease of getting int~the area
•Familiarity with the area
•Beauty of the area
•Lack of crowding in the area
•Ease of getting around in.the area
53
..Chance of getting what you wanted in the area..Cost of this activity in the area..Quality of places to stay or camp in the area
..Chance of being close to nature in the area
..Family tradition of doing the activity in the area
Mean ratings of each of the ten specific area attributes and a mean
rating for the overall.assessment of area quality were calculated
for four activity groupings,four population groupings,and four
location groupings.Thus,64 sets of 11 means were calculated.The
activity,population,and location groupings are shown in Table 8-2.
This combination of activities,population groups,and locations
provided data of acceptable reliability and still permitted a
comp~ri.s9n of the mean valu~s of all attributes i.nar'eassharing ..the
same access characteristics as the potential inundation zone with
remote areas outside the study region and with nonremote areas.
The comparison of mean values described above provides a perspective
onthe~-relativeactract-iveness of .di~ferenbareas~-i&-one-assumes
that the values do not vary among individuals in the same population
subgroup.It was also possible to compare the relative value of a
particular activity/location combination with the best substitute
location for an activity on an individual basis.Respondents were
asked not only to rate the ten specific area attributes for the
location they used.they were also asked to make the same
evaluations for the best other area in which they could pursue the
same activity.Each attribute rating for the best other area was
subtracted from the comparable rating for the area actually used to
provide a set of relative comparisons on an individual basis.Mean
difference ratings were calculated for the same activity,
population.and location groupings shown for the mean value ratings
in Table 8-2.
54
}
\I
I!
TABLE 8-2
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
ACTIVITY,POPULATION,AND LOCATION
GROUPINGS FOR RELATIVE VALUE ANALYSIS
Activity Groupings for Relative Value Analysis
•All activities
•Hunting activities
•Fishing activities
•Nonconsumptive activities
Population Groupings for Relative Value Analysis
•study area population as a whole
e Urban population
e Small town population
•Rural population
Location Groupings for Relative Value Analysis
•Study region remote
•Study region nonremote
•Other remote
•Other nonremote
55
8.4 COMPARISON OF USER CHARACTERISTICS
Rural residents who spend less to engage in an activity because they
live closer to the resource are likely to be shown in the dollar
value analysis to attach a lower value to a particular activity/
location combination than urban residents.Taken out of context,
this comparison is misleading.First,rural residents may spend
less in absolute dollars,but may spend a larger proportion of their
income engaging in an .activity.Second,many rural residents may
have forgone the opportunity to maximize their income or receive
other benefits associated with living in urban areas in order to
live closer to fish and wildlife resources.It is therefore
important to compare the economic circumstances of urb,an,small
town,and rural residents.Table 8-3 displays the characteristics
compared among urban,small town,and rural resource users.
The primary objective of the user characteristics analysis was to
determine the extent to which the dollar value analysis results
underestimated the value of rural resident resource uses.The most
.appropriate comparison groups for this analysis were urban,small
town,and rural residents who either hunt or fish since the value of
hunting and fishing products to households can be expected to vary
in direct relationship to a household's ability to purchase food.
Therefore,all comparisons were made among households which reported
__.._..._..~!1g~g~!1g __1!1hl"l!l~_~!1g_Qt_.fll:l_h.ing ...~<;_tiyiti~s_,_._._______---------
56
.1
-\
,)
>I
i I
lJ
TABLE 8-3
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
URBAN •SMALL TOWN.AND RURAL
ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
II Education
•Months worked per adult in household
•Income
II Proportion of food derived from hunting and fishing
II Perceived importance of living in community with regard to:
-opportunity to get a job
-long-term economic opportunity
-challenging or exciting job
-opportunity to earn a high income
-nearby hunting and fishing
-chance to be self-reliant
-being close to a wilderness environment
-nearby outdoor recreation opportunities
-chance to get away from urban problems
-being part of a small community
-being near friends
57
I
I
I
I !
,I
11
~l
I 1
;)
I
I 1
,1
I======~~~:_=-------========---------------------,,1
I I
'I
,f
:\
58
!j
i Iu
IJ
U
9.0 LEVELS OF RESOURCE USE
9.1 INTRODUCTION
One of the primary objective of this study was to produce estimates
of the number of urban,small town,and rural residents who use
resources that might be affected by the Susitna Project.As
described earlier,a random sample of 4,545 study area residents
provided the information necessary to produce resource use
estimates.This chapter is intended to introduce the reader to the
detailed resource use estimates contained in Exhibit B.The chapter
begins by describing the characteristics of the data,including its
limitations.The remainder of the chapter summarizes the results.
Sample survey data such as that used to derive the resource use
estimates reported in this study are subject to both sampling error
and measurement error.Resource use estimates are reported as a
range rather than a point estimate so that the reader can readily
see the size of the potential sampling error.A range of 450 to 550,
for example,means that the estimated sampling error for the
particular resource use estimate is plus or minus 50.
It is much more difficult to estimate the size of the measurement
error.Measurement error can result from mistakes made by the
respondent in reporting their activities,mistakes made by the
interviewer in recording responses,and errors or omissions in the
questionnaire.Measurement errors are virtually impossible to
completely eliminate but can be limited to a small percentage of
responses with the application of standard survey procedures.
While measurement errors are often ignored,it is important in this
case for the reader to 'be aware of the potential effects of
measurement errors on the resource use estimates.Given the overall
59
purpose of the study,resource use estimates for the potential
inundation area (Area 10)the areas that would be opened up to road
i l
access (Areas 11 and 12),and the area most likely to experience
downstream effects (Area 1)are of particular interest.Areas 10,
11 and 12 currently experience relatively low levels of resour.ce J
I I
use.Even a sample of 4,545 respondents would not be expected to
contain more than a few people who live in households that have
visited these remote areas of the study region.
that the resource use estimates for remote areas
~~-----------------------
At the same time,most of these 4,545 respondents can be expected to
report resource use activities in other areas.If even a small
proportion of these reported activities are miscoded into a remote
area,the resource use estimate for that remote area can be
significantly inflated.To minimize this problem,a comprehensive
list of some geographic features was used to locate each reported
resource use activity within one of the fourteen analysis areas
described earlier.Many conunonly-used rivers and streams crossed
through several analysis areas,however,and interviewers sometimes
found it difficult to locate the activity within a single analysis
a-rea:~-Asarestilt;some miscocHrig of resource .-uses--undoubfediy
occurred.Assuming that the miscoded number is equally likely to be
an area used rarely as an area used frequently,the impact of
miscoding will be greatest in the analysis areas in which the least
actual activity occurs.The reader should,therefore,keep in mind
are likely_to .__
_____---'excee.d_ac±.uaL-le.vels-o£-r.esour.ce-use-.-.--------------------
Three ranges of resource use estimates are given for each type of
resource use for urban,small town,and rural residents as well as
for the stud.Y.~I:'l:!a popullii::ionl:ll;J3..wh.Qle.Thethree.ranges are
labeled "ever,""1980-1985,"and "1984."The estimates reported
under each of the three ranges do not refer to the total number or
percentage of households that have engaged in an activity for a
given location but rather to a subset of that total.Respondents
60
I
,I
[1
I I
were not asked to report every location at which they did each
resource use activity each year.Rather,they were asked to report
the last location at which they did each resource use activity in
the last year they did the activity (1)in the study region and
(2)outside the study region.
If one or more members of a given household pursued the same
activity in three different locations in the last year,only the
location of the last engagement contributes to the reported resource
use estimate.Similarly,if one or more members of a household
pursue a given activity every year,only the location of the most
recent year's engagement contributes to the reported resource use
estimates.The ranges,therefore,always refer to an aggregation of
the number or percentage of household reports on the last time an
activity was pursued.
While it may at first appear as ~f it would have been preferable to
collect information on all locations where each activity was
pursued,such an approach would have been impossible.Respondents
could not be expected to report all locations,particularly for
multiple years.It was necessary to capture resource uses in
multiple years in order to expand the sample of resource users to a
size sufficient for the value analysis.
The implication of the resource use reporting method used in this
study is that the reported resource use estimates underestimate
total resource use in specific locations,but not as a whole.The
extent of underestimation depends on the frequency of resource use
within individual households and the diversity of locations used for
the same resource use activity,again within individual households.
The extent of underestimation is clearly less for shorter time
periods since there is less opportunity for multiple engagements at
different locations.Thus,the most restrictive time period
61
reported,1984,should be considered the closest estimate to that
which corresponds to total resource use at specific locations.
Activities that are commonly pursued several times each year,
however,still would be underestimated for specific locations used
early in the year.
The distribution of some resource uses in 1984 may not be reliable
indicators of the distribution of resource use over longer time
periods since wildlife population fluctuations,changing regula-
tions,and short-term weather conditions can be expected to
influence the pattern of resource use.Range estimates for longer
periods of time accurately identify the total number of households
engaging in specific resource uses but underestimate total use of
specific areas since the last location reported for a given activity
cannot be assumed to be the only location used bya household for
that activity.
In general,however,range estimates for both shorter and longer
periods reliably indicate the relative distribution of resource use
between .remot.e areas ana areas accessible byroad.It this
distinction that is most important to make in the present study as
the Susitna Project would provide road access into previously remote
areas.
The final point to keep in mind is that the 198'i rang~_est_im.at.f:_s ..__.__._~.~~.•.~~_.~.~-_.,---_.._._-~_.__.,---..•......_-----_•....._._.._---_."--_._,--_.---,_.--....~-_.-....----_...__._--
______ae.tual!¥--ar-e-cons-troc-ted--f.t'!om-t'!epoF-ted-ae--t-i-v-i-t-i-es-t-hroug-h-Apri11:-------
1985.Respondents were asked to report the last year a member of
their household pursued an activity,and in some cases the year
mentioned was 1985.While this approach probably slightly
overest.illl.at~sWiI1t.~J::"J::"~SQut"cf:uses,it was _judged to be preferable
to the alternative of excluding households which reported activity
in 1985 and,therefoJ::"e,did not report whether or not they engaged
in the same activity in 1984.
62
I
I
II,J
IJ
u
9.2 SUMMARY OF RESOURCE USE ESTIMATES
Exhibit B cohtains the 42 resource use tables that constitute the
primary product of this research.The basic.question they are
intended to.answer is how much resource use occurs in the areas
likely to be affected by the Susitna Project.Table 9-1 presents a
summary of the distribution of resource uses among all households in
the study area.The Susitna Project's inundation zone is closely
represented by Area 10.Table 9-1 shows that 0.3 percent of all
resource use in 1984 occurred in Area 10.Based on maximum
estimated sampling errors,less than 1,000 households engaged in any
resource use activity in Area 10 in 1984.Considering all resource
use activities together,Area 10 therefore receives a negligible
proportion of total resource use.This conclusion holds for rural,
small town,and urban residents.
The plan of proposed Project access (Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission ~984)calls for a road to be constructed from the Denali
Highway sou'lih to the Watana Dam and a road to be constructed from
the Watana DaIil.west to the Devil Canyon Dam.Assuming that these
roads would be open to the public following constructon,resource
use in areas south of the Denali Highway could significantly expand.
Opening the access roads would increase use of the areas by small
town and urban residents.This increased use could place current
rural users of the areas at a competitive disadvantage.It is
therefore important to examine existing levels of rural resource use
in the areas subject to improved access.These areas are best
represented by study analysis Areas 11 and 12.Table 9-1 shows that
2.2 percent of all rural resource uses occurred in Areas 11 and 12
in 1984.
Less than 200 rural households engaged in any resource use activity
in Areas 11 and 12 in 1984.(The best estimate is 88 rural
households.)Improved access does not,therefore,appear to pose a
potential problem for rural resource users as a group.This is not
63
to say that some of the 200 individual rural resource users of
Areas 11 and 12 may not faced increased competition for resources a
result of improved access to Areas 11 and 12.
The finding of low·resource use levels in Area 10 and in Areas 11
and 12 for resource uses in general also holds for hunting,fishing,
and nonconsumptive uses individually.Referring again to Table 9-1,
the percentage of all hunting resource uses located in either
Area 10 or in Areas 11 and 12 are below 2 percent among urban,small
town,and rural households.The same is true for fishing and
nonconsumptive activities.Table 9-1 does not present comparable
data by individual activity,but a review'of the detailed tables in
Exhibit B clearly shows that the pattern of extremely low use levels
in Areas 10,11 and 12 holds for all individual activities and for
rural,small town,and urban population subgroups as well as for the
population as a whole.
Another area of concern is the Susitna River reach between Devil's
~l:I.nY'()tl~Ed1:.l'u~.cc:lI1flu~nc~oLthe Susitnaand--Chu-litnaRiv:ers near~-
Talkeetna (within Area 1).Changes in water flow,temperature,and
turbidity regimes could a.ffect salmon stocks.An estimated
1,800 study area households fish for salmon in Area 1 annually.The
1,800 households account for approximately 2.5 percent of all study
area households annually involved in recreational or personal use of
The survey sample of 4,545 study area residents did not include
anyone who used the Susitna River within the potential inundation
zone for kayaking or any other form of boating the last time th~Y'
went boating in 1984.It is entirely possible that none of the
small number of individuals who went boa.ting in Area 10 in 1984 fell
into the survey sample (the probability of no Area 10 boaters
falling into the survey is 0.46 if 20 individuals used Area 10 for
64
~\
I \
I \
(\
11
.\
'\
\
\
.\
r \
1
TABLE 9-1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
HOUSEHOLDS USING KEY AREAS
IN 1984
Urban Small Town Rural Total
Total Nurrber Percent Nurrber Percent Nuntler Percent Nuntler Percent
11 Area 10 531 0.3 69 0.3 19 0.5 619 0.3
Areas 11,12 1,381 0.8 208 1.0 88 2.2 1,677 0.9 I
Remainder study region 72,120 42.3 10,631 50.5 2,168 53.7 84,919 43.4
E1sewhere--remote 13,487 7.9 1,420 6.7 246 6.1 15,153 7.8
E1sewhere--nonremote 82,850 48.7 8,725 41.5 1,512 37.5 93,087 47.6
TOTAL 170.369 100.0 21,053 100.0 4.033 100.0 195.455 100.0
Hunting
Area 10 212 0.4 14 0.2 5 0.2 231 0.3
Areas 11,12 319 0.6 97 1.0 42 1.8 458 0.7
Remainder study region 23,686 43.1 5,371 57.5 1,373 60.3 30,430 45.7
E1sewhere--remote 4,297 7.8 540 5.8 120 5.3 4,957 7.5
E1sewhere--nonremote 26,399 48.1 3,318 35.5 739 32.4 30,456 45.8
TOTAL 54.913 100.0 9,340 100.0 2.279 100.0 66,532 100.0
[j Flshing
Area 10 212 0.2 28 0.2 3 0.1 243 0.2
Areas 11,12 531 0.5 42 0.3 21 0.8 594 0.5
Remainder study region 44,292 41.6 7,716 55.1 1,713 61.7 53,721 43.6
E1sewhere--remote 8,610 8.1 870 6.2 146 5.2 9,626 7.8
E1sewhere--nonremote 52,889 49.6 5,347 38.2 894 32.2 59.130 47.9
TOTAL 106,534 100.0 14.003 100.0 2,777 100.0 123.314 100.0
Nonconsll!!ptive
Area 10 212 0.1 14 0.1 13 0.4 239 0.1
I I Areas 11,12 850 0.5 83 0.4 37 1.0 970 0.6
LJ Remalnder study reg19n 63,729 40.5 9,840 51.6 2,096 57.2 75,665 42.0
E1sewhere--remote 12,982 8.3 1,278 6.7 212 5.8 14,472 8.0
IJ
E1sewhere--nonremote 79,744 50.6 7,853 41.2 1,306 35.6 88,903 49.3
TOTAL 157.517 100.0 19,068 100.0 3,664 100.0 180.249 100.0
IJ
65
their last boating experience in 1984).The survey results should
not,therefore,be used to estimate levels of use of this special,
but extremely small,subpopulation.
The survey results indicate that neither portions of Area 10 nor
improved access to Areas 11 or 12 would directly affect the resource
use activities of more than 2 percent of all study area households,
or more than 4 percent of all rural households who currently use
these areas.The next chapter of this report examines the dollar
value of resource'activities of these areas in the context of the
dollar values of resource activities pursued elsewhere in the state.
66
\
\
11
I
i·I
I
1
u
[I
,I
10.0 DOLLAR VALUE OF RESOURCE USES
10.1 INTRODUCTION
The estimation of dollar values for resource use activities takes
into account the number of resource users in different areas and the
quality of these different reso~rce use areas.The dollar value
estimates are restricted to a single year's worth of household
resource uses and,therefore,do not indicate the value of resource
uses in perpetuity.Neither should the dollar value estimates be
interpreted to mean the value lost if the Susitna Hydroelectric
Project goes forward.Rather,the dollar value estimates provide a
useful indication of the gross annual value of resource uses by
location.Changes in access,wildlife population levels,and other
area attributes could increase or decrease the gross annual value of
resource uses at a given location.Finally,dollar values
underestimate the total value of a location to rural resource users
who have chosen to live near resources at a sacrifice to their
income earning potential.
As described in Section 8.2,the first analysis step for estimating
dollar values for resource use activities was to calculate low,
intermediate,and high value estimates for a single engagement in a
resource use.The low estimate is based on "out-of-pocket"expenses
incurred getting to the activity location.The intermediate
estimate adds the value of travel time to the low estimate.The
high estimate adds,to the intermediate estimate,the respondent's
reported willingness to pay an additional amount in order to engage
in the activity.
The second analysis step was to multiply the mean value estimates
times the number of trips taken to the same place to do the same
activity.These intermediate (i.e.,nonreported)values correspond
67
to the estimated value of all trips taken by a household.The final
analysis step was to multiply the calculated mean values for all
trips times the estimated total number of resource users engaging in
the same activity at the same location.
10.2 SUMMARY OF DOLLAR VALUE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Tables 10-1 through 10-12 present both mean and aggregate dollar
value estimates,first for all activities and all study area
residents and,subsequently,for urban,small town,and rural
residents.The same reporting format is used to present mean and
aggregate dollar value estimates for hunting,.fishing,and
nonconsumptive activities.Table 10.1 shows that the mean dollar
value for resource uses as a whole in the potential inundation zone,
Area 10,ranges from a low of $83·per trip to a high of ·'$321 per
trip.As described in Section 8.2,these estimates are based on all
remote activities pursued in the study region,and not solely on
activities pursued in Area 10.
The mean dollar vallie estimates for Area 10'ana for Areas i1 and 12
are similar to the mean dollar value estimates for remote areas
outside the Susitna study region.As expected,they are higher than
for nonremote areas.Travel costs are likely to be higher to access
r~mote areas and the quality of the experience sought is likely to
be greater.
The aggregate dollar value estimates presented in Tables 10-1
through 10-12 establish a much different perspective on the value of
remote areas in the study region.The aggregate value estimates are
the product of the mean value estimates and r~source use.estimates.
The use analysis results presented in section 9.2 showed that only
0.3 percent of all study area households used resources in Area 10
in 1984.Although the mean dollar value estimates are higher for
remote than nonremote areas,extremely low levels of use cause the
68
I )
"f
I
-:1
,f,I
aggregate dollar value estimates to also be low in remote areas.
Table 10-13 directly compares the percent of total aggregate value
attributed to the six key analysis areas.In no case do Areas 10,
11,or 12 account for more than 3 percent of total aggregate value.
Areas 10, 11,and 12 are relatively more important to small town and
rural households than they are to urban households.In absolute,
terms,however,these areas are more valuable to the urban
population than the small town and rural populations combined.The
high estimated aggregate value to the urban population is $1,554,456
while the combined high estimated aggregate value to the small town
and rural populations is $259,314.
Another concern raised about Susitna Project is its_~ffect on salmon
stocks in the river reach between Devil's Canyon and the confluence
with the Chulitna River.
The estimated annual value of Area 1,which contains this reach of
the Susitna River for recreational salmon fishing,is between
$499,000 and $1,374,000.These figures represent between 2.0 and
2.4 percent of the aggregate annual value of all fishing sites
within and outside the study region.
69
ANNUAL AGGREGATE DOLLAR VALUE
OF ALL TRIPS
All HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10
Areas 11_12
Other Study Region Remote
Study Region Nonremote
Elsewhere Remote
Elsewhere Nonremote
Table 10-1
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ALL ACTIVITIES BY AREA
MEAN DOLLAR VALUE
OF LAST TRIP
Low Intermediate Hijh
83 137 321
83 137 321
82 135 321
37 87 174
93 160 296
31 75 117
Low
180,171
481,732
3,584,454
11,586,665
6,853,495
13,360,494
Inter med i ate
309,137
828,749
6,049,178
24,521,468
12,29~7 ,?23
30,755,120
High
492,321
1,321,249
9,803,213
36,332,421
16,184,420
40;171,260
.I
l.
i
I
I \'
I
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 93 150 345 159,300 268,155 431,703
Areas 11.12 93 150 345 414,300 697,405 1~123~753 )\Other StUdy Region Remote 92 148 347 3,084,345 5,088,650 8,349,540
StUdy Region Nonremote 38 92 181 10,124,540 21,607,250 31,793~525
Elsewhere ReiOOte ---~---98··.168 30(>6,541,195 1[;-6&6;255 15;159,38-8
Elsewhere Nonremote 31 75 113 12,013,250 28,003,300 35,874,050
SHAll TOWN HOUSEHOLDS !Area 10 56 108 253 18~O78 36,156 52,302Areas11_12 56 108 253 54,4%108,992 157 ~66 11
1_Q~h~!:_~.tU~L8.~gjgrl.I!~'t~.·56-··--·---108-·--239-.··············_-359,.304-_··_·-718,608-··--1,018,028·Study Region Nonremote 2&...____59 130 l.p223~640-2~539.p.980-3r-98&.~100ElsewhereRemote66106292302,460 568,000 955,&60
f
Elsewhere Nonremote 33 '1"140 1,291,300 2.547~700 3,647,050J!
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IArea1020381612,793 4,826 B,SIGAreas11_12 20 38 161 12,936 22~352 40,832
)other Study Region Remote 20 39 159 140,805 241,920 435,645StudyRegionNonremote32&0 147 238,485 374,238 552,7%
Elsewhere Remote 19 35 55 9,B40 63,468 69,372
"~Elsewhere Nonremote 14 53 341 55,944 204,120 650,160
70
1\
Table 10-2
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
HUNTING BY AREA
MEAN DOLLAR VALUE
DE LAST TRIP
ANNUAL AGGREGATE DOLLAR VALUE
OF ALL TRIPS
\
I ALL HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10
Areas 11,12
Other Study Reglon Remote
Study Reglon Nonremote
Elsewhere Remote
Elsewhere Nonremote
Low Intermediate
103 IG6
103 1GG
102 113
45 93
152 249
31 78
High
471
471
471
249
577
155
Low
41,137
'78,451
1,412,768
2,404,713
1,232,068
2,538,482
Intermediate
64,790
124,449
2,237,920
4,456,640
2,105,21'7
5,413,269
High
153,780
286~871
5,222,~%
9,461,706
3.882,989
8,874~019
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 112 178 506 38,160 59,')%113.94.8
Areas 11,12 112 178 506 57,420 90,27'7 216~601
Other Study Reglon Remote III 176 512 1,142,640 1,796,484 4,373,773
Study Region Nonremote 48 98 260 1,889,842 3,554,290 7~611~382
Elsewhere Remote 163 274 611 1,048,468 1,894,977 3,424,/'09
Elsewhere Nonremote 31 80 152 2,059,122 4,646,224 7~523.715
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 86 150 426 2,702 4,144 8,372
Areas 11,12 86 150 426 18,721 28,712 58,006
Other Study Region Remote 8a 151 388 228,520 343,360 649,600
Study Region Nonremote 35 71 200 383,201 715,870 1,532,804
Elsewhere Remote 119 148 508 182,520 207,900 451,440
Elsewhere Nonremote 39 76 218 437,976 670,236 1,240,932
RURA~HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 30 69 180 275 650 1,460
Areas 11,12 30 69 180 2,310 5,460 12,2M
Other Study Region Remote 30 70 169 41,608 98,076 1'39,124
Study Region Nonremote 38 83 237 131,670 186,480 317,520
Elsewhere Remote B 16 47 1,080 2,400 6,840
Elsewhere Nonremote 7 26 40 41,384 %,809 109,372
71
ANNUAL AGGREGATE DOLl.AR 'lALUE
OF ALL nIPS
All HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10
Areas 11,12
Other Study Regl0n Remote
Study Regl0n Nonremote
Elsewhere Remote
Elsewhere Nonremote
Table 10-3
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
FISH ING BY AREA
MEAN DOLLAR VALUE
OF LAST tRIP
Low Intermediate Hi~h
73 119 265
73 119 265
72 117 264
37 89 169
aa 157 233
42 92 146
Low
69,298
165,741
3,084,541
5,64&,230
2,713,120
9,266,783
Inter-mediate
123,259
297.366
5,304,'770
13,049,924
4,631,1?B
18,448,863
1'30 ~'lIS?
4b4.388
8,497,785
20 ,4~75 ~332
7!029,284
26,182,526
I ,r
i
(
(.1
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 79 128 2aO 60,420 110,028 171,932 rAreas11,12 79 128 280 151,335 275,589 430~641
Other Study Regl0n Remote 78 126 280 2,634,884 4,625,264 7,440,230 I
Study.~Region-Nonremote-~-3'3-.-~9S ..~l-77 .4,769,.§18 1-}·,001T2-24 ·-l-7·,198yH6 ._-
Elsewhere Remote 8S 162 281 2,341,920 4,046,701}6,233,640 (Elsewhere Nonremote 44 9G 147 8,726,685 17,294,703 24,117,384
ISHALLTOWNHOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 48 82 178 8,68!)12,330 17,336
(Areas 11,12 48 82 178 13.,.Q2D__1.9+320__26.,.2:55
Other Study Regl0n Remote 48 82 176 404,352 600,048 8::!6,:34iJStuClyReglonNonremote2357122783,240 1,881,060 2,991,720 ,'rElsewhereRemote57118302154,860 358,440 557,670ElsewhereNonremote27&4 139 524,006 1,122,870 1,%7,6%, I
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10
Areas 11,12
Other StUdy Regl0n Remote
StUdy Regl0n Nonremote
Elsewhere Remote
Elsewhere Nonremote
19
19
19
27
173
9
34
34
34
48
182
19
72
167
167
167
109
190
71
198
1,386
45,305
93,472
216,340
16,092
351
2,457
79,458
167,640
226,038
31,290
999
&,9~f3
230,707
285,496
237,974
97,44&
)
I
Table 10-4
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES Or
NONCONSUMPTIVE ACTIVITIES
BY AfiEA
MEAN DOLLAR VALUE ANNUAL AGGREGAtE DOLLAR I)ALUE
OF LAST TRIP OF ALL TRIPS
Low Intermediate High Low Irlterrnediate Hi·~h
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 91 139 276 105,219 169.786 229 lf 274
Areas 11,12 91 139 27&425,045 G99~509 941~177
Other Study Region Remote 91 pq 278 2,317,396 3,936,856 5,343,340"'.Study Region Nonremote 35 85 160 12,981,475 27,001,289 36,93&,774
Elsewhere Remote 72 118 166 9,618,500 17,577,060 20.620.976
Elsewhere Nonremote 27 69 102 13,012,988 31,588,276 39,803~337
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 100 165 314 98,156 151,156 204.156
Areas 11,12 100 1&5 314 393;550 606,050 818~550
Other Study Region Remote 99 164 316 1,921,888 2,%5,672 4,009,~56
Study Region Nonremote 36 B9 167 11,261,943 23 ..7:'5 ~213 32,296,154
Elsewhere Remote 76 124 173 9,437,914 16,915,546 19,758,604
Elsewhere Nonremote 26 67 98 11,562,880 28,548,352 35,167,104
SHALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 31 100 163 3,696 13,113 16,590
Areas 11,12 31 100 163 21,912 77,771 98~355
Other Study Region Remote 31 100 163 168,960 599,680 758,400
Study Region Nonremote 25 57 112 1,389,200 2,714,000 3,946,800
Elsewhere Remote 28 55 85 172,530 512,478 713,124
Elsewhere Nonremote 36 85 125 1,413,540 2,811,374 3,588,821
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
Area 10 15 24 146 3,367 5,512 8,528
Areas 11.12 15 24 146 9,583 15,688 24~272
Other Study Region Remote 15 24 148 226,548 371,504 575,434
Study Region Nonremote 33 62 147 330,332 512,076 693,820
Elsewhere Remote 1 36 36 8,056 149,036 149,248
Elsewhere Nonremote 21 90 711 36,568 228,550 1,047,412
73
Table 10-5
Susitpa Hydroelectric Project
ESriMATED DOLLAR VALUES DE
ACTIVITIES IN REMOTE AREAS
BY ALL HOUSEHOLDS
Low
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP'
Intermediate High Low
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
ALL TRIPS
Intermediate High I, I
275 544·
321 1,169
267 642
353 657
laS 791
385 471
416 706
491 377
371 469
651 781
475 731
265 452
433 903
Moose Hunting 115 176 421 186
Caribou Hunting 156 234 918 218
Sheep or Goat Hunting 205 263 635 208
Brown Bear Hunting 73 159 395 176
Bl:2c~.Bear HIJnting 81 106 683 136
SDlall Game Hunting 55 152 190 176
King S.31mon Eishin'j 81 121 289 279
Silver Salmon fishing SG 155 343 2G8
Red S.311110n Fishin'j 57 117 163 153
Other Salmon Eishin'j 105 laG 244 357
R.3inbow TrolJt Pi shing 53 89 154 293
Dolly Varden Fishing 47 85 223 153
Lake Trout Fishing 97 1:41 547 328
~~her Tt9-'-JLfishin'L It -----··l,
.Grayling Fishing -70 121 231 251 592 793
BOIJrbot or Cod Fishing 51 102 175 353 1,088 1,179
SIJmlller off Road 46 80 108 304 485 560
Winter Off Road 17 50 102 199 535 637
Skiing 47 G9 180 1,187 1,394 1,994
Motorboatin'j 108 155 220 471 629 782
Canoe,Raft,Kayak 167 ,198 281 599 764 884
Other Boating /(/(/(*.J..&....
·----B;~ckpa-cKr~-------------·-201------'356------4:Jr-----------730 -1,130 1,310
--i-ent-eamping t44 228 838 6~-6 922 1,684
Rec Vehicle C.3mping /(*'1;*'*'Ie
Other Camping /(/(/(/(Ie *-
Hiking,Picnicking 42·79 120 688 949 1,055
Sightseeing 69 131 217 40G 1,241 1,532
AsterisKs refer to estimates which have been supresseddue to insufficient sample size.
74
-\
'·1
I \
r.1
\,I
I'
l.,,
I,
\\
I
T~ble 10-6
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN NONREMOIE AREAS
BY ALL HOUSEHOLDS
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES MEAN,DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP ALL TRIPS
Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High
Moose H'Jnting 51 116 319 107 230 507
CaribolJ Hunting 56 132 302 78 182 419
Sheep or Goat Hunting 45 111 310 50 120 ''jl'')CI'oJ«J
Brown Bear Hunting 45 132 240 54 151 ')'7'1wi....
Black Bear Hunting 40 73 213 93 153 447
Small Game Hunting 28 58 115 121 220 319
King Salmon Fishing 51 123 210 134 291 440
Silver Salmon fishing 35 87 150 157 341 1:''11:'.,J«.,J
Red Salmon Fishing 44 108 178 182 394 578
Other Salmon Fishing 38 98 IS8 160 341 C'~)11.J",;,li
!)1 Rainbow Trout Fishing 28 60 134 1013 231 400IDollyVardenFishing307012283213316)
Lake Trout Fishing 43 83 142 195 367 4%
Other Trout Fishing 23 59 204 59 143 712
Grayling Fishing 35 99 168 136 374 514
Bourbot or Cod Fishing 38 90 220 90 222 458
SIJmlller off Road 43 93 179 481 704 850
Winter Off RO:3d 24 55 90 106 243 326
Skiing 14 42 90 80 230 329
Motorboating 46 107 194 265 612 315
Canoe,Raft,Kayak 29 86 165 231 485 615
Other Boating 29 61 90 184 443 552
9:3ckpacking 28 79 168 93 249 401
Tent Camping 32 89 143 105 335 436
Rec Vehicle Camping 79 179 256 463 789 974
Other Camping 25 66 123 91 195 376
Hiking,Picnicking 27 61 110 100 258 360
Sightseeing 37 9G 159 132 380 4C1 "./1
75
Table 10-7
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN REMOTE AREAS
Bt URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
1}
j
Ij
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP
Low Intermediate
123 190
165 241
II Ie
73 163
II Ie
66 179
82 122
High
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
ALL TRIPS
Low Intermediate High
557
1,216
II
622
*533
730
902
508
Je.
723
}.;
979
}.;
847
1;.
549
330
}.;
I./
.\
,1
I
.j
Asterisks refer to estimates which have been supresseddue to insufficient sample size.
76
I
I
I
Table 10-8
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN NONREHOIE AREAS
BY URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP ALL TRIPS
Low Interllledhte High Low Intermediate High
Moose H'Jnting co')124 33G 97 232 524"'..Caribou Hunting 60 144 336 83 195 46'7
Sheep or Goat Hunting 44 %255 49 103 273
Brown Bear Hunting 46 128 236 56 149 '1c.qwU"
Black Bear Hunting 45 78 219 81 129 456
Small Game Hunting 30 63 119 133 237 325
King Salmon Fishing 54 129 216 137 297 439
Silver Salmon Fishing 37 92 161 166 362 561
Red Salmon Fishing 46 115 190 un 404 605
Other Salmon Fishing 39 103 188 172 366 554
r
Rainbow trout Fishing 31 65 142 109 231 399
Dolly Varden Fishing 31 72 122 85 214 311./
Lake Trout Fishing 46 88 143 205 382 486
Other Trout Fishing 23 59 213 59 140 747
Grayling Fishing 37 105 169 139 371 .<to,".J ...
Bourbot or Cod Fishing 38 93 228 35 215 451
SIJmmer off Ro,'2d 45 98 182 co')"755 884"',,'Winter Oft Road 25 58 86 104 240 302
Skiing 14 44 95 81 ')"'"343w,jl
Motorboating 47 113 205 229 G03 803
Canoe,Raft,Kayak 30 91 178 248 520 GGO
Other Boating 30 61 91 176 434 541
B.'2ckpacking 29 83 178 93 254 415
Tent Camping 33 90 134 109 348 436
Rec Vehicle Camping 81 173 248 491 811 1,004.
Other Camping It.It It *k *Hiking,Picnicking 28 62 108 103 2&6 36GI
(Sightseeing 37 97 161 185 384 503
,j
Asterisks refer to estimates which have been suppressed due to insufficient sample size.
r !
J
77
J
Table 10-9
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN REMOTE AREAS
-BY SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
-/
I
78
I
l
I
'j
}
'\
,l
:\
,\
~
I
;,\
j
")
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP ALL TRIPS
Low Intermedi~te High Low Intermedi.3te Hi'3 h
Moose Huntins 109 151 420 221 284 597
C~ribou Hunting 102 180 567 415 493 936
Sheep or Goat Hunting It It *-*-*-Ie:
Brown Be~r Hunting **-*-*I:*-Black Bear Hunting *-*-*-*-*-It
Small Game Hunting 30 82 124 103 240 305
King ~31mon Fishin§70 118 155 215 354 448
Silver S~lmon Fishing 48 83 347 425 538 863
Red Salmon Fishing 39 liB 119 133 232 299
Other Salmon Fishing 28 *-It *-**-Rainbow Trout Fishing 53 91 126 529 858 954
Dolly Varden Fishing It *-1:.*-*fr.
Lake Trout Fishing 50 92 154 92 200 33G
Other~Trout·-Ftshtn9-··~..7i.*-Grayling Fishing 34 70 189 156 371 G6G
Bourbot or Cod Fishing *k *-It **Summer off RO.3d 28 71 110 209 508 640
Winter Off Road 13 61 119 103 904 1,181Skiing**-*-*-*-'"Motorboating 57 98 162 311 690 821
Canoe,Raft,Kayak *-*-*-*-*-1:-
Tent Camping 48 180 247 208 651 951
Rec Vehicle Camping *-k ****-Other C.3ll1ping ***-It Ie:I<.
Hiking,Picnicking 23 41 61 383 702 8G6
Sightseeing 18 102 132 140 1,165 1,257
Table 10·10
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN NONRE~O!E AREAS
BY SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP ALL TRIPS
Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High
Moose HIJnting 45 79 248 122 191 411
Car i bOIJ Hunting 40 83 164 61 135 232
Sheep or Goat Hunting 49 214 677 63 236 707
Brown Bear Hunting 11 It *;I;It };
Black Bear Hunting 28 55 155 141 ""'7 368"'..,
Small Game Hunting 18 38 99 69 146 308
King Salmon Fishing 28 74 161 no 257 45&
Silver Salmon Fishing 22 54 94 104 217 315
Red Salmon Fishing 31 60 93 203 342 408
Other Salmon Fishing 21 63 96 80 197 250
Rainbow Trout Fishing 17 36 95 105 239 4"";u"
Dolly Varden Fishing 20 64 135 '76 235 387
Lake Trout Fishing 25 54 142 131 274 616
Other Trout Fishing 11 1<'*
;I;It It
Grayling Fishing 25 71 175 129 415 6Bl
Bourbot or Cod Fishing 39 82 189 143 307 573
SIJmmer off RO.3d 31 64 154 182 379 634
Winter Off Road 19 34 111 125 257 448
Skiing 8 23 40 39 115 157
Motorboating 41 71 130 494 671 915
Canoe,Raft,Kayak 18 41 65 97 218 271
Other Boating 22 54 74 50 189 254
B.3ckpacldng 15 43 68 96 206 262
Tent Camping 23 -82 134 62 226 363
Rec Vehicle Camping 62 271 322 123 558 632
Other Camping
'*It ;I;1<11 '*Hiking,Picnicking 19 45 95 80 192 289
Sightseeing 39 92 149 155 352 453
Asterisks refer to estimates which have been suppressed due to insufficient sample size.
79
Table 10-11
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN REMOTE AREAS
BY RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAS!TRIP ALL TRIPS
Low Intermediate High Low Intermedi.3te High
Moose Huntinq 35 &4 175 48 as 26&Caribou Hunting 80 laB 477 loa 222 536SheeporGoatHunting2110026240131310BrownBearHuntingItItItIt1;Jr.Black Bear Hunting 13 3&104 23 68 247SmallGameHunting5173747140173KingSalmonFishth§44 72 315 165 248 524SilverSalmonFishing27487684130191RedSalmonFishingIt1:.1:.f-1:.L1\Other Salmon Fishing 1:.It It It It ItRainbowTroutFishing183029858III495DollyVardenFishing8263371851649LakeTroutFishingIIIIII1:.-Other-Trout-Fishtrlg--l..--T T It 1:.1;Grayling Fishing 17 30 83 54 101 273BourbotorCodFishing2536596693144SummeroffRO.3d 5 13 33 11&475 513WinterOffRoad2131441,100 1,725 1,760Skiing351701741383Motorboating2028393504567S1Canoe,Raft,Kayak 1:.I<1:./..It *
Tent Camping I<It It It It *'Rec Vehicle Camping It It.1:.I<f-Ir.Other Camping 1:.It It It It ItHiking,Picnicking 4 15 27 39 117 235Sightseeing53696072515071,209
Asterisks refer to estimates which have been suppressed due to insufficient sample size.
80
,'I
,(
I
.j
l
(
1
Table 10-12
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUES OF
ACTIVITIES IN NONREMOTE AREAS
BY RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
MEAN DOLLAR VALUES ·MEAN DOLLAR VALUES
LAST TRIP ALL TRIPS
Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High
Moose HIJnting 54 95 231 375 476 660
C.3r ibolJ Hunting 30 104 191 co')132 236.J ..
Sheep or Goat Hunting ******Brown Bear Hunting **',.**11 11
Black Bear Hunting 16 60 312 131 305 562
Small Game Hunting 9 22 87 24 63 l oq1.1.
King Salmon Fishing 32 57 150 127 193 381
Silver Salmon Fishing 18 38 61 99 210 :162
Red Salmon Fishing 24 44 65 104 190 226
Other Salmon Fishing 65 93 492 eo 121 545
Rainbow Trout Fishing 16 29 63 81 131 299
Dolly Varden Fishing 30 ,43 77 59 105 160
Lake Trout Fishing ******Other Trout Fishing *'Ie ****Grayling Fishing 28 55 12 81 170 204
Bourbot or Cod Fishing 12 26 54 19 36 68
S'Jmmer off Road 21 45 1%151 234 602
Winter Ofr Road 16 42 134 77 270 553
Skiing 22 38 63 452 716 779
Motorboating 46 61 88 624 689 766
.Canoe,Raft,Kayak 43 84 117 134 303 375
Other Bbating *1<Ie II **Backpacking 18 46 82 68 168 222
Tent Camping 73 102 975 108 197 1,090
Rec Vehicle Camping II it it it it *Other Camping ***it **Hiking,Picnicking 21 77 355 52 162 461
Si'3htseeing 32 73 128 117 283 377
Asterisks refer to estimates which have been suppressed due to insufficient sample size.,
1
81
I
11.0 RELATIVE VALUE ANALYSIS
11.1 INTRODUCTION
The relative value analysis addresses the question of whether remote
areas of the study region have specific attributes that are of
significantly higher quality than the attributes of other areas.If
so.changes in these specific attributes could have an effect on the
overall value of an area.
Section 8.3 described the relative value analysis.To briefly
recapitulate that description,respondents rated the quality of ten
specific attributes of the area they used for a selected resource
use activity.These attributes were:
•Ease of getting into the area
•Familiarity with the area
•Beauty of the area
•Lack of crowding in the area
•Ease of getting around in the area
•Chance of getting what you wanted in area
•Cost of this activity in the area
•Quality of places to stay or camp in the area
•Chance of being close to nature in the area
•Family tradition of doing the activity in the area
The relative value analysis was approached in two ways.First,ten
mean quality ratings for ten specific attributes and one general
quality measure were calculated for four geographic areas:study
region remote,study region nonremote.other remote.and other
nonremote.These calculations were repeated for all activities as a
group as well as for hunting.fishing,and nonconsumptive activities.
The purpose of this analysis was to identify any attributes which
resource users rated relatively high in study region remote areas.
83
11.2 SUMMARY OF RELATIVE VALUE ANALYSIS
Tables 11-1 through 11-4 present the analysis results.Virtually
all differences are statistically significant due to large sample
sizes,but differences of less than 0.5 should not be considered
important.The means are based on a scale of 0 to 4 where 4 is
equivalent to "very good,"3 is equivalent to "good,"2 is
equivalent to "neither good nor poor,"1 is equivalent to "poor,"
and 0 is equivalent to "very poor."
The only attribute receiving a higher rating for remote areas of the
study region than for the three·other geographic areas was "family
tradition of doing activity.in the area."Even in this case,
however,the differences are not large enough to be important.
It is perhaps surprising that there is so little variation in
attribute ratings between remote and nonremote areas.One must keep
in mind that the ratings are perceptions and not objective measures.
The perceptions may not be based on an absolute level of an
att.rIbute,but rather may be based on the (Utterence between the
expected level of an attribute and the level actually experienced.
Thus,for example,an angler fishing Willow Creek at its busiest
time may expect it to be crowded and may find it less crowded than
expected.As a result,the angler might rate the lack of crowding
\\
1
I,I
..
The lack of variation in perceptions does suggest that resource
users are generally successful in finding attractive locations.
Overall,remote areas of the study region,along wi th all other
areas,wererated midway between "good"and "very good ....
The second approach to the relative value analysis involved
subtracting individual ratings for specific attributes in the best
substitute location from individual ratings for the same specific
attributes in the chosen location.The mean difference in ratings
84
)
indicates the comparative advantage of the chosen location over the
best substitute.Tables 11-5 through 11-8 display the results of
this analysis.
Using a difference of 0.5 as a threshold of importance,no specific
attributes are identified as being comparative advantages of remote
areas of the study region among all users of these areas.However,
rural users of remote areas of the study region reported the
following comparative advantages:
•Ease of getting to area
•Beauty of area
•Familiarity with area
•Cost of activity
•Family tradition of doing activity in area
•Lack of crowding in area
Nei ther urban nor small town resource users reported such
comparative advantages.The rural differences hold for fishing and
nonconsumptive activities as well as for hunting.It should also be
noted that approximately 25 percent of all respondents,most of them
rural residents,found it impossible to rate the quality of specific
attributes in a substitute area.In part,this lack of response
suggests a perceived lack of substitute sites.The reported
comparative advantages of selected sites are,therefore,likely to
be underestimates since they exclude respondents who could not give
a rating for a substitute site.
In summary,rural residents who use remote areas of the study region
do perceive a number of important comparative advantages to their
chosen location.If the analysis results for remote areas of the
study region as a whole hold in the potential inundation zone
(Area 10)and in areas in which access would be changed by a road to
the Watana dam (Areas 11 and 12),changes in these attributes could
substantially affect the quality of resource use experiences of the
few people who use these areas.
85
TABLE 11.1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
MEAN RATING OF LOCATION ATTRIBUTES
FOR ALL ACTIVITIES*
Location Attribute Urban
Small
Town
All
Rural Househlds
3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5
3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
3.5 3.8 3.3 3.6
3.6 3.7 3-.8:-3.6
Ease of getting to area
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Familiarity with location
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Beauty of the area
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Lack of crowding
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
2.8
3.2
2.9
3.4
2.9
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
3.2
2.9
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.9
2.8
3.6
3.0
3.3
3.3
2.9
3.5
3.5
3.2
3.5
3.5
3.0
2.7
2.8
3.2
2.9
3.2
2.9
3.4
3.0
2.9
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.8
3.2
2.9
I
II
J
I
-l
}
1
\
S~udy region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
2.8
3.1
2.9
3.3
2.8
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.0
2.8
3.1
3.0
3.3
*Respondents were asked to .rate each attribut-e on a scaTeOf 0 to-4
where "0"represents a rating of poor and "4"represents a rating of
very good.
86 1
1
Table 11-1.Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Mean Rating of Location Attributes for
All Activities (Cont.)
Chance of getting what you wanted Urban
Small
Town
All
Rural Househlds
study region remote
study region nonremote
other remote
Other nonremote
Cost of activity
study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Quality of places to stay or camp
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Chance of being close to nature
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Family tradition of doing activity
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Overall appeal
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
87
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
2.9
3.2
3.0
3.3
2.7
2.9
2.8
2.9
3.6
3.5
3.7
3.5
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.5
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.1
3.4
3.5
3.5
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.6
3.7
3.5
3.7
3.6
2.7
2.9
3.0
2.7
3.5
3.5
3.7
3.6
3.2
3.0
2.9
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.4
3.7
3.1
2.8
2.1
2.4
3.7
3.5
2.7
3.7
2.9
2.7
1.7
2.9
3.6
3.5
2.9
3.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.0
3.2
3.1
3.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.6
3.5
3.7
3.5
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.5
3.5
3.4
3.6
3.5
TABLE 11-2
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
MEAN RATING OF LOCATION ATTRIBUTES
FOR HUNTING ACTIVITIES*
2.9 2.7 3.5 3.0
2.7 3.0 3.2 2.8
2.9 2.6 3.7 2.9
2.8 3.3 3.5 2.9
3.6 3.6 3.5
3.5 3.6 3.5
3.6 3.8 3.5
3.L 3_•.8 3.5.
All
Rural Househlds
)
j
i
\
I
I
.1
I
·l
)
2.7
3.0
2.3
3.2
3.1
3.2
2.5
4.0
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.0
Small
Town
2.6
3.1
2.2
3.2
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.5
Urban
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
_~O_ther_nonrcemote
Ease of getting to area
Location Attribute
Beauty of the area
Familiarity with location
Lack of crowding
88
1
J
(
i )
l
j
I
I
2.9
2.9
3.5
3.0
2.6
2.8
2.6
3.2
3.0
2.4
3.5
3.0
2.7
2.7
2.6
3.2
3.0
2.7
3.5
3.2
2.4
2.8
3.2
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.5
3.0
2.7
2.8
2.5
3.2
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
*Respondents were asked to rate each attribute on a seale ofOto 4
where "0"represents a rating of poor and "4"represents a rating of
very good.
-)
I Table 11-2.Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Mean Rating of Location At~ributes for
Hunting Activities (Cont.)
Chance of getting what you:'wanted Urban
Small
Town Rural
All
Househlds
I,
I,
study region remote
study region nonremote
other remote
Other nonremote
Cost of activity
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Quality of places to stay or camp
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Chance of being close to nature
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Family tradition of doing activity
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Overall appeal
study region remote
study region nonremote
other remote
Other nonremote
89
2.8
2.6
2.8
2.6
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.8
2.7
3.0
3.0
3.7
3.6
4.0
3.6
2.9
2.5
2.8
2.2
3.4
3.3
3.7
3.3
2.8
2.4
2.8
2.8
3.1
3.3
3.3
3.3
2.8
2.6
1.9
2.5
3.8
3.6
3.6
3.8
2.4
2.8
2.9
2.8
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.5
2.8
2.4
3.2
3.2
3.5
3.0
3.9
3.9
3.1
2.8
3.5
2.9
3.8
3.6
3.7
3.8
2.6
2.7
2.0
3.1
3.5
3.4
3.9
3.6
2.8
2.6
2.8
2.7
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
2.8
2.7
2.9
3.0
3.7
3.6
3.9
3.6
2.8
2.5
2.8
2.3
3.4
3.3
3.6
3.3
TABLE 11-3
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
MEAN RATING OF LOCATION ATTRIBUTES
FOR FISHING ACTIVITIES*
Location Attribute
Ease of getting to area
Study region remote
'Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Familiarity with location
Urban
2.9
3.2
3.2
3.4
Small
Town
3.0
3.1
3.4
3.3
Rural
3.0
3.3
3.5
3.3
All
Househlds
2.9
3.2
3.3
3.3
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Beauty of the area
2.9 3.1 3.4 3.0
2.9 3.\1 3.1 3.0
2.6 3.4 4.0 2.7
2.9 3.2 3.4 3.0
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
_OtheI'.nonr_emote
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.5 3.6 3.5
3.4 3.5 3.5
3.8 3.5 3.6
3._6~__--3..5---.----3.6
Lack of crowding
Study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
2.8
2.5
2.9
2.5
2.8
2.4
3.7
2.7
2.7 2.8
2.4 2.5
2.5 2.9
2.8 2.6
\
I
\
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
2.8
3.0
3.0
3.1
2.8
2.9
3.6
3.2
2.9
3.0
3.0
2.4
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.2
(
)
j
*Respondents were asked to rate each attribute em a scale of 0 to 4
where "0"represents a rating of poor and "4"represents a rating of
very good.
90
!1
Table 11-3.Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Mean Rating of Location Attributes for
Fishing Activities (Cont.)
Chance of getting what you wanted Urban
Study region remote 3.1
Study region nonremote 3.0
Other remote 3.5
Other nonremote 3.1
Cost of activity
Small
Town
3.2
2.9
3.2
3.3
Rural
3.1
2.9
3.0
2.9
All
Househlds
3.1
3.0
3.5
3.1
'II
\
J
I I\J
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Quality of places to stay or camp
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Chance of being close to nature
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Family tradition of doing activity
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Overall appeal
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
91
3.0
3.1
2.9
3.2
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.0
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.5
2.8
2.7
2.2
2.6
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.1
3.3
3.4
3.5
2.5
2.5
3.1
2.9
3.6
3.4
3.7
3.5
2.8
2.8
3.1
2.9
3.5
3.4
3.7
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.4
2.8
2.7
2.5
1.7
3.6
3.5
3.0
3.3
2.9
2.7
2.0
3.2
3.5
3.4
4.0
3.3
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.2
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.6
3.4
3.6
3.5
2.8
2.7
2.3
2.7
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.5
TABLE 11-4
SQSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
MEAN RATING OF LOCATION ATTRIBUTES
FOR NONCONSUMPTIVE ACTIVITIES*
Location Attribute
Ease of getting to area
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Familiarity with location
study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Beauty of the area
Urban
2.9
3.3
3.1
3.5
2.8
2.8
3.1
2.9
Small
Town
3.0
3.3
2.7
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.4
3.2
All
Rural Househlds
3.6 3.0
3.3 3.3
3.5 3.1
3.2 3.5
3.6 3.0
3.2 2.9
3.2 3.1
3.7 3.0
l
l
(
\
I
j
,I
J
i
92
*Respondents were asked to rate each attribute on a scale of 0 to 4
where "0"represents a rating of poor and "4"represents a rating of
very good.
3.1 2.9 3.3 3.1
2.9 3.0 2.9 2.9
3.3 3.7 1.6 3.3
3.0 3.2 3.5 3.0
....~.•..._...._"..~~.~.."-------------"~-_._.._-"----.-._---_.----_._----'.--_._.-._-'"----~--.--_.-.---._-,---.-.--,..,.""
2.9 3.1 3.2 3.0
3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2
3.1 3.3 3.9 3.1
3.3 3.4 3.0 3.3
!I
I
I
I
l
'I
)
,II
,I
,I
3.7 3.7 3.6
3.6 3.7 3.6
4.0 2.4 3.6
4-LO 3._9__-----~3.6
3.5
3.6
3.6
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
study region remote
study region nonremote
Other remote
__-9ther n~nr;,emQ1:.e
Lack of crowding
i I
Table 11-4.Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Mean Rating of Location Attributes for
Nonconsumptive Activities (Cont.)
Small All
Chance of getting what yOU wanted Urban Town Rural Househlds
r ~1
I I Study region remote 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.3
Study region nonremote 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4
Other remote 3.4 3.6 2.2 3.4
Other nonremote 3.5 3.5 3.9 3.5
Cost of activity
Study region remote 2.8 3.2 3.7 3.0
Study region nonremote 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.3
Other remote 3.0 3.7 2.5 3.1
Other nonremote 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.4
Quality of places to stay or camp
Study region remote 2.8 2.9 3.3 2.9
.Study region nonremote 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.9
Other remote 2.7 3.4 .4 2.8
Other nonremote 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.8
Chance of being close to nature
Study region remote 3.5 3.6 3.0 3.5
Study region nonremote 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Other remote 3.7 3.9 1.7 3.6
Other nonremote 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.5
Family tradition of doing activity
Study region remote 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.9
Study region nonremote 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.7
Other remote 2.5 3.1 1.1 2.5
Other nonremote 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.5
Overall appeal
U Study region remote 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6
Study region nonremote 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Other remote 3.5 4.0 1.7 3.5
II Other nonremote 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.6
93
TABLE 11-5
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
DIFFERENCE IN MEAN RATINGS BETWEEN LOCATION USED
AND BEST SUBSTITUTE LOCATION
FOR ALL ACTIVITIES*
-.18 -.02 .63**-.11
.11 .17 .33 .12
.09 .17 -.38 .09
.24 .17 .54 .24
Location Attribute
Ease of getting to area
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Urban
Small
Town Rural
All
Househlds
Familiarity with location
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Beauty of the area
.03 .18 .70 .08
.04 .18 .28 .06
.10 .39 1.90 .15
.23 .20 .07 .23
94
**A difference of a 0.5 or greater can be considered important and
is underlined.
*A positive difference in mean ratings means that the location used
is rated higher on the attribute than the best substitute location.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ j
I
.21
.10
.30
.02
.03
.12
.10
.21
.16
.11
.43
.00
.33
.09
.00
-.07
.27
.04
.10
.02
.06 .34 .04
-.02 .12 .03
-.07 .90 -.01
•06--_·~-.-;L.6------.13 -
-.07
.08
-.08
.16
.20
.10
.32
.02
.03
.12
.11
.21
.01
.03
-.02
..13
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
_~_Qther IlQJU"en1.Qt_e
Lack of crowding
Table 11-5.Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Difference in Mean Ratings Between Loca-
Il
tion Used and Best Substitute Location for
All Activities (Cont.)
Small All
fl
Chance of getting what you wanted Urban Town Rural Househlds
Study region remote .01 .10 .15 .02
Study region nonremote .03 .01 -.01 .03
Other remote .22 -.05 .33 .20
Other nonremote .13 .01 -.14 .13
Cost of activity
Study region remote .15 .22 .87 .20
Study region nonremote .22 .24 .42 .22
Other remote .38 .32 .52 .38
Other nonremote .16 .08 .37 .16
Quality of places to stay or camp
1\
Study region remote .04 .04 .18 .05
Study region nonremote .00 -.02 .06 .00
Other remote -.04 .06 .83 -.02
Other nonremote .09 .07 -.17 .09
(J Chance of being close to nature
II Study region remote .18 .09 .28 .18
Study region nonremote .06 .02 .12 .05
Other remote .23 -.03 -.08 .21
Other nonremote .08 .03 .04 .08
Family tradition of doing activity
Study region remote .03 .27 .74 .09
Study region nonremote .02 i .09 .17 .03
Other remote .12 .14 .52 .12
Other nonremote .12 .03 -.45 .11
Overall appeal
U Study region remote .18 .14 .38 .19
Study region nonremote .03 .03 .16 .04
Other remote .07 .00 .08 .06
I,J Other nonremote .12 .07 .06 .12
95
TABLE 11-6
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
DIFFERENCE IN MEAN RATINGS BETWEEN LOCATION USED
AND BEST SUBSTITUTE LOCATION
FOR HUNTING ACTIVITIES*
Small All
Location Attribute Urban Town Rural Househlds
Ease of getting to area
Study region remote -.10 -.01 .81**-.04
Study region nonremote .21 .32 .46 .23
Other remote -.73 .55 -.37 -.54
Other nonremote .15 .21 .44 .17
Familiarity with location
Study region remote .21 .35 .81 .26
Study region nonremote .11 .41 .36 .16
Other remote -.50 .18 2.00 -.24
Other nonremote -.09 .14 .08 -.06
Beauty of the area
Study region remote .05 .00 1.42 .05
Study region non remote .05 .00 .84 .04
Other remote .-.~~.~",,:.A.S-1,-01 .......25..
Other nonremote -.13 .14 .42 -.09
Lack of crowding
Study region remote .02 .27 1.41 .06
study region nonremote .12 -.16 1.70 .07
Other remote .83 .30 .00 .71
Other nonremote .02 -.07 .44 .00
Ease of getting around
Study region remote .08 -.05 .12 .07
Study region nonremote .17 .18 .21 .18
Other remote .08 -.40 .47 .06
Other nonremote .13 .23 .22 .14
*A positive difference in mean ratings means that the location used
is rated higher on the attribute than the best substitute location.
**A difference of a 0.5 or greater can be considered important and
is under:lined.
96
l
I
!
1
I
I
"-J("
I
I
J
!
I
I
j
'I
·1
I
I I
I
97
TABLE 11-7
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
DIFFERENCE IN MEAN RATINGS BETWEEN LOCATION USED
AND BEST SUBSTITUTE LOCATION
FOR FISHING ACTIVITIES*
Small All
Location Attribute Urban Town Rural Househlds
Ease of getting to area
Study region remote -.24 .03 .51**-.18
Study region nonremote .12 .04 .39 .12
Other remote .60 .13 .00 .56
Other nonremote .30 -.01 1.87 .29
Familiarity with location
Study region remote -.03 .13 .67 .02
Study region nonremote .11 .11 .32 .11
Other remote .21 .40 .00 .23
Other nonremote .35 .09 .03 .33
Beauty of the area
Study region remote .04 .00 1.33 .06
Study region nonremote .04 -.06 .95 .03
Other remote .O_().....20 ...00 _.02
Other nonremote .06 .01 .42 .05
Lack of crowding
Study region remote .31 .25 1.91 .31
Study region nonremote .06 .07 1.67 .06
Other remote .09 .40 .00 .12
Other nonremote -.09 -.04 .39 -.09
Ease of getting around
Study region remote .09 -.05 .21 .08
Study region nonremote .13 .05 .06 .12
Other remote .08 .07 .00 .08
Other nonremote .22 .07 .16 .21
*A positive difference in mean ratings means that the location used
is rated higher on the attribute than the best substitute location.
**A difference of a 0.5 or greater can be considered important and
is underlined.
98
I
I
!
Table 11-7.Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Difference in Mean Ratings Between Loca-
tion Used and Best Substitute Location forI-j Fishing Activities (Cont.)
Small All
r )
Chance of getting what YOU wanted Urban Town Rural Househlds
Study region remote .01 .08 .28 .02
[I Study region nonremote .01 -.06 -.01 .00
I J
Other remote .50 .00 .00 .45
Other nonremote .11 -.04 .00 .10
]Cost of activity
Study region remote .23 .22 .88 .26
II
Study region nonremote .18 .27 .51 .19
Other remote .67 .07 .00 .61
Other nonremote .16 .12 1.00 .16
Quality of places to stay or camp
Study region remote -.03 .04 .11 -.02
11
Study region nonremote .03 -.07 .09 .02
Other remote .13 .00 .00 .12
Other nonremote .22 .19 .26 .22
[j Chance of being close to nature
I I Study region remote .25 .13 .43 .25
IJ Study region nonremote .10 .04 .13 .09
Other remote .46 -.07 .00 .41
Other nonremote .04 .00 -.10 .03
Family tradition of doing activity
Study region remote -.Q3 .35 1.04 .05
Study region nonremote .01 .07 .15 .02
Other remote .17 .23 .00 .17
[1
Other nonremote .17 .01 .29 .16
Overall appeal
U Study region remote .18 .14 .46 .19
Study region nonremote .01 .02 .21 .02 -
Other remote .08 .20 .00 .09
IJ Other nonremote .07 .05 -.10 .07
U
99
100
**A difference of a 0.5 or greater can be considered important and
is underlined.
'I
I I
'I
I
(,
j
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I I
I ]
.15
.12
.27
.06
.04
.01
.22
.23
-.04
.10
.01
.23
-.03
.02
.03
-.12
.10
.12
.22
.67
.23
2.00
.09
1.22
1.33
.00
.59
.14
.11
.00
-.28
All
Rural Househlds
.64**
.25
-1.00
.13
.07
.15
.53
.29
-.13
.20
-.06
.29
.25
.00
-.06
..(fr
.30
.08
-.33
.09
-.15
.08
.00
.21
Small
Town
.12
.12
.~O
.06
-.11
.09
.02
.23
-.05
-.01
.20
.22
-.09
.0:2
.04
.1.8
-.15
.10
.12
.22
Urban
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
TABLE 11:-8
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
DIFFERENCE IN MEAN RATINGS BETWEEN LOCATION USED
AND BEST SUBSTITUTE LOCATION
FOR NONCONSUMPTIVE"ACTIVITIES*
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Other nonremote
Study region remote
Study region nonremote
Other remote
Ot1'ie'rfiofiremo'te
Ease of getting to area
Location Attribute
Familiarity with location
Beauty of the area
Lack of crowding
Ease of-getting a~ound
*A positive difference in mean ratings means that the location used
is rated higher on the attribute than the best substitute location.
101
j
!
,I
J
J
'.\.
\
!
~I
(J
,I=========~==~~~~======------_.~....I f
j
f\
I
I..
102
I j
12.0 COMPARISON OF USER CHARACTERISTICS
12.1 INTRODUCTION
Results of the dollar value analysis ~y themselves suggest that the
primary value of the potential inundation zone (Area 10)is its
value to urban resource users.Urban resource users spend an
average of over 3.5 times the amount of money as rural resource
users to access remote areas of the study region.The value of
their travel time is over twice that of rural resource users,and
their willingness to pay is 1.5 times that of rural resource users.
In aggregate,the maximum dollar value of the potential inundation
zone is almost 50 times greater for urban resource users than it is
for rural resource users.
A major reason that the aggregate value of the potential inundation
zone is nearly 50 times greater for urban residents than it is for
rural residents is that in absolute numbers,there are 28 times as
many urban resource users in Area 10 as there are rural resource
users.The fact that urban resource users live farther away from
remote areas of the study region than rural resource users explains
part of the reason that average urban expenses to access remote
areas of the region are greater.All other things being equal,
however,this difference should be reduced to zero if both urban and
rural residents value locations the same and people's willingness to
pay an additional amount to engage in the activity is considered.
Under these circumstances,one would expect the average amount urban
resource users are willing to pay would be less than the average
amount rural resource users are willing pay.
In fact,as shown in Tables 10-1 through 10-12,urban resource users
are willing to pay more than rural or small town users,on average,
to engage in their activities.These results could be interpreted
103
I
the }
the
,\1for
this
to suggest that,on a per-capita basis and an aggregate basis,
values of the potential inundation zone and all other areas of
study region are greater for urban resource users than they are
small town or rural resource users.Before accepting
conclusion,it is necessary to consider the ability of different
population groups to pay for their resource use activities.
12.2 SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Table 12-1 compares the household incomes of urban,small town,
and rural resource users.The median income of urban resource users
was $45,000 in 1984.Forty-two percent of all urban resource user
households had incomes exceeding $50,000.The median income of
small town resource users was slightly lower at $40,000 in 1984.In
contrast,the median income of rural resource users was only
$22,000.Less than 20 percent of all rural resource users had
household incomes of $50,000 or more in 1984,and 44 percent had
incomes of under $20,000 .
.~Tb.elowerific6mes~(ff rural resource user~sisIargely the·result
of the fact that they spent less time working for wages than urban
1
!1
'I
Ii
households worked 9.0 months in 1984.
resource users.On average,adults in urban resource user
The average in small town
resource user households was 7.9,and the average in rural resource
user households was 6.1 months in 1984.
Although rural resource users spent significantly less time than
urban resource users working for wages in 1984,there is evidence
that they are not substantially less qualified to obtain
employment..Rural resource users 1l.a,v:~all aY~t:a,g~c>f 13.1.yearsof
education,compared with 13.5 years for small town resource users
and 13.9 years for urban resource users.The difference in months
worked and income is more likely because there are fewer jobs in
104
i I.
I
,I
"I
TABLE 12-1
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
INCOME AND EDUCATION OF RESOURCE CONSUMERS*
(Percent)
i
I Alljl
small Resource
Urban Town Rural Consumers
Income
Under $10,000 2 4 13 3
$10,000 -19,999 12 11 30 12
$20,000 -29,999 13 14 16 13
$30,000 -39,999 16 19 11 16
$40,000 -49,999 15 19 10 15
$50,000 or more 42 38 20 41
Total 100 100 100 100
Median Income $45,000 $40,000 $22,000 $45,000,.
I
I
"Education
I
.1 Elementary 2 3 5 3
Some high school 5 7 7 5
High school 30 36 39 30
Some college 32 30 28 32
College 16 12 12 16
Post college 15 12 9 14
Total 100 100 100 100
Mean Education 13.9 13.5 13.2 13.9
*Resource consumers consist of the subset of all households who
have engaged in either hunting or fishing activities.
105
rural areas and because rural residents have chosen a lifestyle that
involves substantial amounts of nonwage productive activity.
Table 12-2 compares the importance of various reasons for living
in one's community among urban,small town,and rural resource users.
The opportunity to get a job is very important to 56 percent of all
urban resource user households,but only to 25 percent of all rural
resource user households.Similar differences can be observed for
the importance of economic opportunity,importance of a challenging
job,and the importance of opportunities to earn a high income.
Rural resource users are much more concerned with the quality of
hunting and fishing opportunities and the surrounding environment.
sixty-nine percent of rural resource users believe nearby hunting
and fishing opportunities are very important compa.red with
44 percent of urban resource users.Seventy-one percent of rural
resource users believe that being close to a wilderness environment
is very important compared with 51 percent of urban resource users.
Rural resource users also attach more importance to recreational
opport"iliifles;68 percent believe that nearby outdoor recreational
opportunities are very important compared with 52 percent of urban
resource users.
Underlying rural interests in hunting and fishing opportunities
.,ilL..-iln__in_t~J:·e.st __inb.eing self~reliant.__Fifty=six---percenLbelieve-------------.
-----~t.hat-the-chance-to-be-se-1f_....rei_iant-_is-verrimp·ort:ant-e-omp-a-re-d-wt'tn:
31 percent of urban resource users.In keeping with their desires,
44 percent of all rural resource user households report that
50 percent or more of all the meat and fish consumed is from hunting
and fishing ..(see .Table 12-3).This .figure compares··with 18·percent
of all urban resource user households.
106
I.1
{
\
,~
L.
'\I
.1
\
i-\
\...
Ii
I
,I
I I
,I
./
I./
!
!l
!I
I
'_I
TABLE 12-2
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
REASONS FOR LIVING IN COMMUNITY AMONG RESOURCE CONSUMERS
(Percent Saying Very Important)
All
Small Resource
Reasons Urban Town Rural Consumers
Opportunity to get a job 56 40 25 54
Long-term economic opportunity 50 37 30 48
Having a challenging or
exciting job 49 39 36 48
Opportunity to earn a high
income 47 31 20 44
Nearby hunting and fishing 44 57 69 46
Being close to a wilderness
environment 51 58 71 53
Nearby outdoor recreation
opportunities 52 61 68 53
Chance to be self-reliant 31 39 56 32
107
TABLE 12-3
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
RESOURCE CONSUMPTION AMONG RESOURCE CONSUMERS
(Percent)
All 't
Small Resource I
Urban Town Rural Consumers
Percent of Food from Hunting and Fishing
None 12 10 7 12 i1 - 9 percent 32 27 18 31
10 -24 percent 26 22 20 25
25 -49 percent 12 13 11 12
50 -74 percent 10 13 25 11
75 percent or more 8 15 19 9
,
{Total 100 100 100 100
Mean Percent 22.9 32.1 41.7 24.4 \r
l
,I
The above results suggest that rural resource users have made a
conscious choice to locate their residence near areas which offer
hunting,fishing,and outdoor recreation opportunities.While
well-educated and probably competitive in the wage employment
sector,they are less concerned with employment and income
opportuni ties than their urban counterparts.As a result,rural
household incomes average about half of urban household incomes,and
rural household dependence on personal use of fish and game is about
twice that of urban resource user households.
Lower mean and aggregate dollar estimates for the value of resource
uses to urban,small town,and rural households must,therefore,be
understood in the context of the different lifestyles present in
these populations.Rural residents spend less on their resource use
activities,and their willingness to pay is constrained by limited
incomes.At the same time,they are more dependent on their
resour~e use activities to provide a substantial part of their food.
109
:i
J
I
:t
I
..1
I't
I
I
I-
I ~
\\,.
....\
~I
tI
..!
!f
I
I
110
1
I
I
REFERENCES
Alaska Department of Fish and Game,1983.Moose Harvest and Permit
Report (combined).Anchorage.
Cesario,F.J.,1976.Value of Time in Recreation Benefit Studies.
Land Economics,Feb.,Vol.52,No.1.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,1984.Draft Environmental
Impact Statement,Susitna Hydroelectric Project,FERC No.71114-
Alaska,Vol.1,Figure 2-11.
ISER,1979.Alaska Public Survey unpublished data.Institute of
Social and Economic Research,University of Alaska,Anchorage.
Jubenville,Alan,1985.Representative Rivers:A Research Program
Based on Management Decision-making.Agroborealis 17(1):
43-46.
Linsky,A.,1975.Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires:
A Review.Public Opinion Quarterly,39(1):82-101.
Mills,Michael J.,1984.Statewide Harvest Survey:Federal Aid
in Fish Restoration and Anadromous Fish Studies,Vol..25,
July 1,1983 through June 30,1984.Alaska Department of
Fish and Game,Juneau.
Moser,C.A.and G.Kalton,1972.Survey Methods in Social Investi-
gation.New York:Basic Books,Second Edition,p.147.
Stratton,Lee,1982.Patterns of Use of the Nelchina Caribou Herd:
1982.Division of Subsistence,Alaska Department of Fish and
Game,Anchorage.
________,1983.Copper Basin Caribou Use:A Research Update.Divi-
sion of Subsistence Technical Paper No.75,Alaska Department
of Fish and Game,Anchorage.
,Susan Georgette,1984.Use of Fish and Game by Communities------~in the Copper River Basin,Alaska:A Report on a 1983 House-
hold Survey.Alaska Department of Fish and Game,Technical
Paper No.107,Anchorage.
111
SUSITNA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT RESOURCE USER SURVEY
February 1985
HELLENl'HAL &ASSOCIATES,INC
5000 Southampton Drive
Anchorage,Alaska 99503
(907)561-1267 or
561-4676
m 1-2-3-4-
CDl 5-
(CODERS ONLY)
I-I.Hello,I am (FILL IN NAME)from HELLENI'HAL &ASSOCIATES calling for
the State of Alaska.We are conducting a survey with the University of Alaska on hunting,
fishing,and outdoor recreation in Alaska.Your telephone number was randomly selected by
a computer.(IF SEroND READING,00 '.ID INTRODUCTION #I-2)
Sl.Is this telephone number ?(IF NO,TERMINATE WITH,"I'm sorry I
dialed the wrong number.")
S2.Is this a residential telephone?(IF NO,TERMINATE INTERVIEW WI'ffi,"I 'm
sorry,I need to talk with someone at a residential telephone.")
S3.Are you the person in your household who knows the IlOst about your
household's hunting and fishing?
IF YES,THEN PROCEED '.ID INTRODUCTION #I-2.
IF NO,THEN ASK •••••
Is the person home who knows the IlOSt about these activities?
IF YES,THEN ASK •••••
May I speak with them?(00 'ill INTRODUCTION #I-lOR TERMINATE
AND NOI'E ON TELEPHONE CALL RECORD SHEET )
IF NO,'JlIEN ASK ••••••
When will that person be home?(TERMINATE AND NOI'E 'JlIE TIME
AND DATE ON TELEPHONE CALL RECORD SHEET )
IF NO ONE IN HOUSEHOLD KNCWS ABOUT HUNTING AND FISHING ACTIVITIES
'JlIEN ASK •••••
S4.Are you the person in your household who knows the IlOSt about your
household's other outdoor recreational activities?
IF YES,THEN PROCEED '.ID INTRODUCTION #I-2.
IF NO,THEN ASK •••••
Is the person home who knows the IlOSt about these activities?
IF YES,THEN ASK •••••
May I speak with them?(00 '.ID INTRODUCTION #I-lOR TERMINATE
AND NOI'E ON TELEPHONE CALL RECORD SHEET )
IF NO,'ffiEN ASK ••••••
When will that person be home?(TERMINATE AND NC7I'E 'JlIE TIME
AND DATE ON TELEPHONE CALL RECORD SHEET )
1-2.I would like to ask you some questions which will help the State of Alaska take
people's hunting,fishing,and other outdoor recreational activities into account in
planning for the Susitna Hydroelectric Project.All of your answers will be completely
confidential and will be used only in combination with the answers of other Alaskans.The
questions I need to ask can take up to 30 minutes,but I find that IlOSt of mine are
shorter.The interview is completely voluntary.If we come to any questions you don't
want to answer,just let me know and we will go on to the next question.(PAUSE AND
PROCEED WI'ffi QUESTION jj:1)
- 1 -
1.When waS the last year you,or someone else in your household,went hunting or
trapping?(IF "NEVER",THEN RECORD "00"IN COL 6-7-,'mEN SKIP 'ID FISHING1 IF NOT NEVER,
THEN RECORD lAST 'IWJ DIGITS OF YEAR IN COL 6-7-AND ASK GAME TYPES)
TYPES OF WILD GAME
98
OON'T KNOW
99
REFUSED
l
1
2.When
fishing?
ACI'IVITIES 1
TYPES)
Hunting?:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••6-7--
~ose?•••.,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••0 ••00 •.,••••••••.,.,•••••••••••••08-9-
caribou?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••!•••••••••••10-11--
Sheep or Goat?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••12-13--
Brown Bear?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••14-15---
Black Bear?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••16-17-·-
Small Game Hunting or Trapping,Like Ducks,
ptarmigan,Snowshoe Hare or Rabbit,Fox,Etc.?••••••••••••••••18-19--
was.the last year you,or someone else in your household,went non-commercial
(IF "NEVER",THEN RECORD "00"IN COL 20-21-,THEN SKIP 'ill Ol'HER RECREATIONAL
IF NOT-NEVER,THEN RECORD lAST '1WO DIGITS OF YEAR IN COL 20-21-AND ASK FISH
~ishing?:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••20-21--
.8a.l.:Iron?:••'"•••••0 ••••••••••••0 •••••••••••••.,•••••••••••••••tll~0",__* _••".4.~-2.:3--
King Salmon?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••24-25---
8a.l.:Iron other than King?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••26-27--
Trout?:.oo.oo ••••••••••••••oCl.oo ••o ••eo.ooooo.oooo.oooOO ••OIlClClOI;IOO.28-29---
Grayling?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••30-31--
Burbot or Fresh Water Ling COd?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••32-33--
________...>3 .•-When-was-the-last-year-you,orsomeone-else-in your oousehold,•••••(READ LIST)
Used a SUmmer Off-road Vehicle?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••34-35----
Used a Winter Off-road Vehicle?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••36-37----
Went Skiing,Snowshoeing,orDog Sledding?••••••••••••••••••••••••38-39----
Went Boating?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••40-41-
Went Backpacking or Tent or Recreational Vehicle camping?•••••••••42-43--
Went Day hiking,Picnicing,or Berry Picking?•••••••••••••••••••••44-45--
Went Sightseeing or Took Wildlife or SCenic Photographs?••••••••••46-47----
- 2 -
)
\I
III '
\J
In order to identify the effect of the Susitna Dam on hunting,fishing,and other outdoor
recreational activities,I would like to ask about your own household's outdoor activities
in two areas.The first is the area bounded by the Parks,Glen,Richardson,and Denali
Highways.Communities in this area include Palmer,Wasilla,Sutton,Glennallen,Paxon,
cantwell,Talkeetna.lake Louise,the Gulkana River,Sheep Hountain,and Byer'sLake
campground are also in this area.The second area is South and West of the Parks Highway
and East of the Alaska Range.The Lower Susitna River and the Deshka River are in this
area.Do you know where the two areas are that I am talking about?(IF "NOli,THEN
REDESCRIBE AREAS 'ID '!HEM;IF PERSISTENT II NO ,S",THEN SKIP 'ID PAGE #5)
4.(ASK ONLY OF Q-#l AC1'IVITIES WHICH ARE .NOr "NEVERII OR nOon)When was the last
year you,or someone else in your household,went hunting or trapping in either of these
two areas?(IF IlNEVER",THEN RECORD "00"IN COL 48-49-,THEN SKIP 'ID FISHING;IF NOT
NEVER,THEN RECORD LAST 'lID DIGITS OF YEAR IN COL 48-49-AND ASK GAME TYPES)
TYPES OF WILD GAME
98
OON'T KNCW
99
REFUSED
Hunting?:.....•..................................................G ••••48-49--
Moose?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••50-51--
caribou?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••52-53--
Sheep or Goat?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••54-55--
Brown Bear?••••••••••.•••.••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..••••.•56-57--
Black Bear?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••58-59--
Small Game Hunting or Trapping,Like Ducks,
ptarmigan,Snowshoe Hare or Rabbit,Fox,Etc.?••••••••••••••••60-61----
5.(ASK ONLY OF Q-#2 AC1'IVITIES WHICH ARE ~"NEVER"OR nOon)When was the last
year you,or someone else in your household,went non-commercial fishing in either of
these two areas?(IF IlNEVER",THEN RECORD 1100 11 IN COL 62-63-,'!HEN SKIP 'ID OTHER
RECREATIONAL AC1'IVITIES;IF NOT-NEVER,THEN RECORD lAST 'lID DIGITS OF YEAR IN COL 62-63-
AND ASK FISH TYPES)
Fishing?:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••62-63--
sa.1.Iron?:••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••".•Q .64-65--
King sa.1.Iron?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••66-67--
sa.1.Iron other than King?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••68-69--
Trout?:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••~••••••••••••••••••••70-71-.---
Grayling?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••72-73--
Burbot or Fresh Water Ling COd?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••74-75--
6.(ASK ONLY OF Q-#3 AC1'IVITIES WHICH ARE ~"NEVER"OR nOon)When was the last
year you,or someone else in your household,(FILL IN OTHER RECREATIONAL
AC1'IVITIES)in either of these two areas?
OTHER RECREATIONAL AC1'IVITIES:
Used a Summer Off-road Vehicle?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••76-77----
Used a Winter Off-road Vehicle?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••78-79--
ID2 1-2-3-4-
CO2 5-
(CODERS ONLY)
Went Skiing,Snowshoeing,or Dog Sledding?••••••••••••••••••••••••••6-7---
Went Boating?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••8-9---
Went Backpacking or Tent or Recreational Vehicle camping?•••••••••lO-ll---
Went Day hiking,Picnicing,or Berry Picking?•••••••••••••••••••••12-13----
Went Sightseeing or Took Wildlife or SCenic Photographs?••••••••••14-15---
-3 -
PAGE 4.I have a map in front of me with 15 subareas of the two areas I described to you
and I need to identify which subarea your household went (REPEll.T FOR ALL
HUNTING GAME TYPE,FISH TYPE,AND C1I'HER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES !:m'.GIVEN A "NEVER"OR
"DO"IN QUESTIONS #4,#5,AND #6)the last time during 19xx (FILL IN YEAR FROM PAGE 3).
What was the closest landmark,such as a road or river,near where you (FILL IN
ACTIVITY TYPE)the last time?(PROBE UNTIL YOU CAN IJXATE 'mE PROPER SUB.!\REA NUMBER ON
YOUR MAP)
SUB.!\REA'--.PAGE 4_16-57--
OON'T I<:l'X:lv •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
PAGE 5.(ASK IF U\ST YEARS ON PAGE #2 ARE MORE RECENl''!HAN r.;.sr YEARS ON PAGE jf3 -THE
SUSITNA AREA)Now could you please tell me where you went (FILL IN ACTIVITY
TYPE)the last time you did it.Was this •••••
In an area 10 miles North of the Denali Highway,••••••l
In the Anchorage/Chugach Mountain area,•••••••••••••••2
On the Kenai Peninsula,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••3
In the Copper RiverlWrangelllValdez area,•••••••••••••4
In SOutheast,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••5
Elsewhere in Alaska,or was it ••••••••••••••••••••••••6
Outside of Alaska?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••7
___....__~_PAGE 5 58,.78-=
DON'qJ-!<NClV ••••••••••(What isyotffoost guess?)••••••••8
REFUSED.•• •••••••••• ••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••9
i 1
\
I I
-4and6-
PAGE 6 CD3 5-
(CODERS (M;Y)
)
I
"
.~
1
1
SELEC'l'ION METHOD FOR 00 ACTIVITIES (CIRCLE THE TIP SELECl'EP ON PAGE 6):
select as activities only 70's or 80's on Pages 2 and 3.
'Ibere are activities within the Greater Susitna Area (Page 3 non-"OO"):
If there are 2,take all.
If there are rrore than 2,count the number of SUsitna Area activities,and
pick random numbers between 1 and the number of activities,and count down
to the random number picked.Repeat procedure for second Susitna Area
activity.
If there are less than 2,take all and make up quota from outside the Susitna
area.
Need activities from outside of the SUsitna Area (Page 2 non-liDO"):
Need 2:
If there are rrore than 2,count the number of activities,and pick a ran-
dom number between 1 and the number of activities,and count down to
the random number picked.Repeat procedure for second activity.
If there are 2 or less,take all.
Need 1:
If there are rrore than 1,count the number of activities,and pick a ran-
dom number between 1 and the number of activities,and count down to
the random number picked.
If there is 1,take it.
From the hunting,fishing,or other recreational activities you mentioned - I have
selected two that I would like to ask you further questions about.(PAUSE AND PRCCEED)
l2A.(IF ACI'IVITY SELECTED IS "SAlMON ornER THAN KING","TROtJr""BOATING",OR "WENT
Bl\CKPACKING OR TENT OR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE CAMPING"-'!HEN ASK •••••)
l2A-l.(IF "SAlMON ornER 'mAN KING",ASK:)Was the salrron you were last after •••••
Silver or COho,••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••.l
Red or SOckeye,•••••••••••.•••••..••..••••••2
Churn or Dog,or was it a •••••••••••••••••••.3
Pink or Humpy?••••.•••••••••••••.••••.•••••4arHER,SPECIFY,_
12-
DON'T KNCW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••G •••••9
l2A-2.(IF "TROtJrll,ASK •••••)Was the trout you were last after
Rainbow,•••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••0 •••••1
Dolly Varden or Char,or was it ••••••••••••2
Lake Trout?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•3ornER,SPECIFY _
13-
DON'T KNew ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
l2A-3.(IF "WEN!'BOATING",ASK ••••) ,Was the boating you last did
Motorboating,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l
ca.noeing,.••...••.•.•.•...•••...•.........0 .2
Kayaking,or was it ••••••••••••••••••••••••3
Ra.fting?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••o4ornER,SPECIFY,_
14-
DON'T KNCW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
l2A-4.(IF "WENT Bl\CKPACKING OR TENT OR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE CAMPING",ASK ••••)Was
that backpacking,tent camping,or recreational vehicle camping that you did
last?
MO<PAac:ING •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1
TENT CAMPING ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••2
RECREATIONAL VEHICAL CAMPING ••••••••••••••••3
15-
DON'T KNO'1 ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
- 7 -
12B.During 19__(FILL IN Il\.ST YEAR OF 1ST AcrIVITY FR(1Il PAGE 2 OR 3),how many total
times did you go (FILL IN 1ST AcrIVITY TYPE,NCII'LOCALIZED)?
NUMBER OF TIMES,16-17-
DON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
12C.Now thinking again of your last trip (FILL IN 1ST ACTIVITY AND LOCATION)
what was the last type of transportation that you used to get to where you began actually
doing the activity?
NONE,JUST WALKED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1
ROAD VEHICLE,LIKE A CAR,'!'ROCK,Ere •••••••••••••2
AIR VEHICLE,LIKE AN AIRPLANE OR HELICDPTER ••••••3
WATER VEHICLE LIKE A BOAT OR CANOE •••••••••••••••4
OFF ROAD VEHICLE LIKE SNa\1MAQIINE OR 3-WHEELER •••5OI'HER,SPECIFY _
18-
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)•••••••8
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
120.How many total members of your household were involved in this trip?
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS<--.19-20-
DON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED.,.,.,0 flO .,.,.,(I .,.,.,.,0 ., ., ., .,0 .,.,.,.,0 .,0 .,0 .,•••., ., .,099
12E.How many total people (including those who are DQt members of your household,like
friends1 but not including guides)were involved in this trip?
NUMBER OF PEOPLE<--,21-22-
DON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?>.•••98
REFUSED ••.,•.,I)•.,.,••., .,••.,••., .,•.,(I ., .,.,....00 •••.,.,.,99
l2F.How many total hours and minutes did it take you to travel from your horne to where
you began (FILL IN 1ST ACTIVITY AND LOCATION)?
NUMBER OF HOtJRS,--'23-24-
NUMBER OF MINUTES'--~25-26-
DON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED (I ..0 ., .,II .,., .,0 .,II III (I 0 .,g .,0 .,I).,0 ....,0 .,0 •., ., .,•., ..99
12G.During how many total days (inclUding travel>did your (FILL IN 1ST
ACTIVITY AND LOCATION)trip take?
________________________OON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
.REFUSED.D.,.,••••••.,.,••.,....,•.,•.,.,.,•.,0 0""(I.III ....99
12H.Please tell me approximately how much your household spent during that trip for each
of the following items:(ROUND '1U NEAREST DOLIAR)
Fuel and/or other travel costs,29-30-31-
Food and Drink 32-33-34-
Fees and/or Guide Service 35-36-37-
Lodging 38-39-40-
r-ti.scellaneous,.i .e.i .antlIUnition,etc:~41-42-43-
Estimated total cost of trip 44-45-46-47-48-
NOI'HING •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••OOO
DON'T KNCW •••(What is your best guess?)•••998
REFUSED •••••••••••••.,.,•.,999
-8 -
1
I
1
j
"I
'I
l2I.You said the cost of this last trip was $(PAGE 8;Q *12H;COL 44-45-46-47-48-)?
Would you still use this location as frequently to (FILL IN 1ST ACrIVITY),if
your cost were •••••$50 more?$100 more?$150 more?$200 more?$250 more?$300 more?
$350 more?$400 more?(AND 00 ON,UNTIL THEY SAY "NO",THEN ASK:"What is the exact
dollar amount?")
AMClONl',-49-50-51-52-53--
NOl'HING •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••OOOOO
OVER $99,997 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99997
OON'T KNCW ••(What is your best guess?)••99998
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99999
l2J.In school,we were often given the grades A,B, C,D,or F (FAIL)to evaluate the
quality of our M:lrk.Given that an A is very good,a B is good,a C is neither good nor
poor,a D is poor,and an F is very poor -please grade this location and the best other
area of the State in which you can do the same activity along the following dimensions.
Along a scale from A to F,what grade M:luld you give (FILL IN:"This location"
AND "Best other area of state")in terms of (FILL IN DIMENSION)?(REPEAT FOR
EACH DIMENSION AND PrACE APPROPRIATE NUMBER ON ANSWER SHEET)
DIMENSION
4
A
3
B
2
C
1
D
o
F
8
OON'T
KNCW
9
RE-
FUSED
The~~~e~~6&~?~~~.~:.~::~:••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••54-'-
BEST OI'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••55-
YOUfHfr~H~.~~~?:?:.~::~:56--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••57----
The.Jff~u~h6ti:.~::~:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••58--
BEST Ol'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••','••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••59-
The lack of crowding in the area:
THIS I.OCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••60-
BEST OI'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••61----
The ease of qetting around within the area:
THIS I.OCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••62--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••63--
The~~~hg&~~~?~?~~.~~~.~~~~~.~.~?:.~::~:••••••••••••••••••••••••••64--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••65-
The cost of this activity in the area:
mIS I.OCA'I'IOO ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••66--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••67.-'--
The~~lt6tA~o~:~:::.:~.::~~.~:.:~.~.:?:.~::~:••••••••••••••••••••••••~.68---
BEST OI'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••69-
The chance of being close to nature in the area:
mrs I.OCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••70--
BEST Ol'HER AREA OF S'I21.TE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••71-
The family tradition of doing the activity in the area:
'!'EllS I.OCATION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••0 ••••••••••••••72--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••~•••••••••••••••••••••••73-
Its~¥~r~iP.fl5&~:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••74-
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••75--
12K.Do you own land near where you last _(FILL IN 1ST ACTIVITY AND I.OCATION)?
YES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••o.1
00 •.•..••...•..••.••.••..••••.•..•••.•.•.•..2
76-
OON'T KNCW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
- 9 -
2ND ACl'IVITY
ID4 1-2-3-4-
CD4 5-
(CODERS ONLY)
Now we are to the second activity that I need further information about.(PAUSE AND
PROCEED)
13A.(IF ACTIVITY SELECTED IS "SALMON OI'HER THAN KING","TROUT""OOATING",OR "WENr
BACKPAa<ING OR TENr OR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE CAMPING"-THEN ASK •••••)
13A-1.(IF "S1UNON OI'HER THAN KING",ASK:)Was the saloon you were last after •••••
Silver or COho,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l
Red or SOckeye,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••2
Chum or Dog,or was it a ••••••••••••••••••••3
Pink or Humpy?••••~••••••••••••••••••••••••4aIHER,SPECIFY._
6-
DON'T KNOW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
13A..,2.(IF "TROUT",ASK •••••)Was the trout you were last after
Ra.inbow,iii""a .,(I"0 011""tiI 1
Dolly Varden or Char,or was it ••••••••••••2
Lake Trout?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••3OI'HER,SPOCIFY _
7-
DON'T KNOW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
13A-3.(IF "WENr BOATING",ASK ••••)Was the boating you last did
Motorboating,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l
canoeing,...•..lIoo.oo •••••
·Kayaking·,otwas·it ••••••••••••••••••••••••3
Rafting?0,0 4Cfl'HER,SPOCIFY._
8-
DON'T KNOW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED 0 (I""(I It Ill ..0 0 9
13A-4.(IF "WENr BACKPACKING OR TENr OR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE CAMPING",ASK ••••)Was
that backpacking,tent canping,or .lr~e~~c:J:r:ea~t~:li·co)~nl~al~'v\7~e=lh~ji.~c!let:-:~~ll2!~g..!l:~.y!2.!J.gid_.
._..._.__..............J.=•.'-.._.
••••••1:1 ••••••••••••000 ••000 ••0
TENr CAMPING Cl 0 0 2
RECREATIONAL VEHICAL CAMPING ••••••••••••••••3
9-
DON'T KNOW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED 0"""""""G.."ill.9
13B.During 19__(FILL IN UIST YEAR OF 2ND ACTIVITY FROM PAGE 2 OR 3),hqW manY total
timesdicl yqu go (FILL IN 2ND ACTIVITY TYPE,NOr :u:x::ALIZED)?.
NUMBER OF TIMES.__-=----====.lO-ll=
DON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
-10-
I
.1
l
\I
l2B-2.During 19_(FILL IN LAST YEAR OF 1ST ACI'IVITY FROM PAGE 3),how many total times
did you go (FILL IN 1ST ACI'IVITY TYPE)in the two greater susitna areas that we
talked about earlier?
NUMBER OF TIMES IN 'IWO GREATER SUSITNA AREAS__77-78-
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)••••••98
REFUSED.0 0 ••••••••••0 •••••••••••••••••0 •••99
12B-3.During 19_(FILL IN LAST YEAR OF 1ST ACI'IVITY FroM PAGE 3),how many total times
did you go (FILL IN 1ST ACI'IVITY TYPE,I..OCALIZED 'ID SUEAREA)in the one of the
15 subareas of the two areas that we talked about earlier?
NUMBER OF TIMES IN SUEAREA OF SUSITNA 79-80-
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)••••••98
REFUSED .:99
13B-2.During 19_(FILL IN LAST YEAR OF 1ST ACI'IVITY FROM PAGE 3),how many total times
did you go (FILL IN 1ST ACI'IVITY TYPE)in the two greater Susitna areas that we
talked abou~earlier?
NUMBER OF TIMES IN 'IWO GREATER SUSITNl\APE.l\.8 71-72-
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)••••••98
REFUSED 11 0 99
13B-3.During 19_(FILL IN LAST YEAR OF 1ST ACI'IVITY FroM PAGE 3),how many total 'times
did you go (FILL IN 1ST ACI'IVITY TYPE,I..OCALIZED 'ID SUEAREA)in the one of the
15 subareas of the two areas that we talked about earlier?
NUMBER OF TIMES IN SUBAREA OF SUSITNAI...-73-74-
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)••••••98
REFUSED OCt iii 0 00 0 0 0 99
13C.NJw thinking again of your last trip (FILL IN 2ND ACI'IVITY AND LOCATION)
what was the last type of transportation that you used to get to where you began actually
doing the activity?
NONE,JUST WALKED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1
ROAD VEHICLE,LIKE A CAR.TRUCK,ETC •••••••••••••2
AIR VEHICLE,LIKE AN AIRPLANE OR HELIooPTER ••••••3
WATER VEHICLE LIKE A BOAT OR CANOE •••••••••••••••4
OFF ROAD VEHICLE LIKE SNCWMAOUNE OR 3-WHEELER •••SOl'HER,SPECIFY _
12-
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)•••••••8
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
13D.HoW many total members of your household were involved in this trip?
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 13-14--
DON'T KNCW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
13E.How many total people (including those who are nQt members of your household.like
friends;but not including guides)were involved in this trip?
NUMBER OF PEOPLE,-.-L1S-16-
DON'T KNCW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
13F.How many total hours and minutes did it take you to travel from your home to where
you began (FILL IN 2ND ACI'IVITY AND LOCATION)?
NUMBER OF HOURS'---.17-18-
NUMBER OF MINOl'ES..19-20-
DON'T KNCW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••III Ill •••••Ill ••••••••"•••••III Ill •••1:1 ...99
)
13G.During how many total days
ACI'IVITY AND LOCATION)trip take?
(including travel>did your (FILL IN 2ND
NUMBER OF DAYS.--'21-22--
DON'T KNCW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
13H.Please tell me approximately how much your household spent during that trip for each
of the following items:(ROUND 'IO NEAREST DOLlAR)
Fuel and/or other travel costs 23-24-25--
Food and Drink 26-27-28--
____Feesand/orGuideSeL'Vice---------------29;;;30=31=-----------
Lodging 32=33=3~4~=---------
___________________---MisceJ:laneous,i.e.,ammunition,etc.35-36-37--
Estimated total cost of trip 38-39-40-41-42----
WI'HING •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••OOO
DON'T KNCW •••(What is your best guess?)•••998
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••999
13I.You said the cost of this last trip was $ _(PAGE 11;Q U3H;ooL 38-39-40-41-42-)?
toK>uld ..you .still use tilis lqqation as frequently to .(FILL IN 2ND ACI'IVITYl,if
your cost were •••••$50 more?$100 more?$150 more?$200 more?$250 more?$300 lIX)re?
$350 more?$400 more?(AND SO ON,UNTIL THEY SAY "NO",THEN ASK:"What is the exact
dollar ••i:lri'01lI1t?")
AMOUNT ---:43-44-4S-46-47-
WI'HING •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••OOOOO
OVER $99,997 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99997
DON'T KNOW ••(What is your best guess?)••99998
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99999
-11-
.l
13J.In school,we were often given the grades A,B,C,D,or F (FAIL)to evaluate the
quality of our v.urk.Given that an A is very good,a B is good,a C is neither good nor
poor,a D is poor,and an F is very poor -please grade this location and the best other
area of the State in which you can do the same activity along the following diIrensions.
Along a scale from A to F,what grade v.uuld you give (FILL IN:"This location"
AND "Best other area of state")in terms of (FILL IN DIMENSION)?(REPFAT FOR
FAOI DIMENSION AND PLACE APPROPRIATE NUMBER ON ANSWER SHEET)
DIMENSION
4
A
3
B
2
C
1
D
o
F
8
OON'T
KNrn
9
RE-
FUSED
IJ
Ij1_
The ease of getting into the area:
'!HIS LOCATION •••••••••••••••••~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••48--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••49-
Your familiarity with the area:
'!HIS LOCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••50-
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE ••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••.•••.•...•••••••.••.•51--
The beauty of the area:
'!HIS IDCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••52-
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••53--
The lack of crowding in the area:
'!HIS LOCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••54-
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••55-
The ease of getting around within the area:
'lliIS IDCATION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••0 ••••••56--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE ••••••••••••••.••.••••••.•••••.•••.•.•••••.•••••.57--
The chance of getting what you wanted in the area:
mrs IDCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••58--
BEST OIHER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••~•••••••••••••••••••59--
The cost of this activity in the area:
mIS IDCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••6 0--
BEST OIHER AREA OF STATE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••.•••••61--
The quality of places to stay or camp in the area:
'IlIIS LOCATION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••Cl 62--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••63--
The chance of being close to nature in the area:
mIS IDCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••64--
BEST OI'HER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••65--
The family tradition of doing the activity in the area:
'!HIS LOCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••66-
BEST OIHER AREA OF STATE •••••••••••••••..•••••••••••.•••••••••••••.••.••.67--
Its overall appeal:
'!HIS LOCATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••68-
BEST OIliER AREA OF s:rA.'IE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••69-
13K.Do you own land near where you last _(FILL IN 2ND ACTIVITY AND LOCATION)?
YEs •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1
00 ..••••.••....••..••..•.•••.••..•••.......•2
70-
OON'T KNav ••••(What is ybur best guess?)••••8
RF.f'USED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••It ••••9
-12 -
105 1-2-3-4-
CDS 5-
(CODERS ONLY)
14.From the following list of outdoor types equipment that you own for non-commercial
use -please tell me if your household owns that type of equipment;and if so,what you
would estimate its present value to be;and what percent (%)of the value of this
equipment is used for __(FlU,IN 1ST AND 2ND AcrIVITIES,BlJI'NOr '!HEIR LOCATIONS)in
the two SUsitna Areas I described earlier and what percent (%)of the value of this
equipment is used for __(FlU,IN 1ST AND 2ND AcrIVITIES,BlJl'NOI'THEIR LOCATIONS)in
other areas?(REPEAT FOR EACH EQUIPMENT TYPE)(OVER $99,997 =99997 AND OVER 97%=97)
EQUIPMENT TYPES
1 2
OON'T
CWN
8
DON'T
KNCXV
9
RE-
FUSED
camping Vehicles (Like pickup-campers,RV's,Vans,etc.)•••••••••••••••••••••6--
ESTIMATED PRESENT VALUE,7-8-9-10-ll-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST AcrIVITY IN SUSITNA'-~12-13-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST ACTIVITY IN 01'HER AREAS 14-15--
.%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACTIVITY IN SUSITN/\16-17-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND AcrIVITY IN OI'HER AREAS 18-19-
Snow Machines,Sleds,and ATV's (Like weasels,3-wheelers,swamp buggies)•••20-
ESTIMATED PRESENT VALUE,.21-22-23-24-25-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST ACTIVITY IN SUSITN/\26-27-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST AcrIVITY IN OI'HER AREAS 28-29-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND AcrIVITY IN SUSITNA 30-31-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND AcrIVITY IN OI'HER AREAS 32-33-
Boats and Equipment (Like canoes,kayaks,jet boats,air boats,etc.)•••••••34--
ESTIMATED PRESENT VALUEe....-35-36-37-38-39-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST ACI'IVITY IN SUSITN/\40-41--..
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST ACI'IVITY IN OI'HER AREAS'--,42-43-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACI'IVITY IN SUSITN/\44-45-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACI'IVITY IN OI'HER AREAS 46-47-
Airplane .............•...,G D 0:>•••0 0 ••0 •II 0 ..III ., ...,0 '"<;I •1:1 <)48--
ESTIMATED PRESENT VALUEe..--:49-50-51-52-53-
%OF VALUE USEDFOR.IST-ACTIVITY-IN-SUSI.t:rlilA -----54=55:::=:::-----_..------_...._-----_._.__.__....__..._.....-...-
____________%_EJF-VAWE-f:1SED-FOR-lST-A~IN-OI'flE:RAREAS,~56-57-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACI'IVITY IN SUSITNA....~58-59-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACI'IVITY IN OI'HER AREAS 60-61-
Hunting,Fishing and camping Equipment and Gear
(like rifles,fishing rods,tents,
sleeping bags,skiis,cameras,
special clothes,etc.)••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••62-
ESTIMATED PRESENT VALUEe..-.63-64-65-66-67-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST ACI'IVITY IN SUSITNA....---C68-69-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 1ST ACI'IVITY IN Ol'HER AREAS 70-71-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACI'IVITY IN SUSITNA'--72-73-
%OF VALUE USED FOR 2ND ACI'IVITY IN 01'HER AREAS 74-75-
-13 -
I
[
[
1
I
ID6 1-2-3-4-
CD6 5-
(OJDERS ONLY)
LEAVE '!HIS COLUMN BIANK 6-
16.What percent (%)of the Ireat and fish constnned by your household is from hunting and
fishing?
PERCENr OF MEAT AND FISH~7-8-9--
DON'T KNCX'V •••(What is your best guess?)•••998
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••999
17.How many total years and months have you lived in Alaska?(WRITE NUMBER OF YEARS AND
MONIHS ON ANSWER SHEET)
xx YEARS,~lO-ll-
XX ~10N.IHS,~12-13--
DON'T KNav •••(WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?)•••998
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••999
18.How many total years and months have you lived in ?(FILL IN NAr-lE OF
COMMUNITY)(WRITE NUMBER OF YEARS AND MONTHS ON ANSWER SHEET)
XX YEARS'--~14-l5-
XX MONTHS,~16-l7--
DON'T KNCX'V •••(What is your best guess?)•••998
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••999
19.Given that an A is very important,a B is important,a C is neither important or
unimportant,a D is unimportant,and an F is very unimportant -please grade each of the
following qualities in terms of how important that quality is to you,personally,for
living in (FILL IN NAr-1E OF COMMUNITY).Along a scale from A to F,what grade
would you give (FILL IN EVERY QUALITY)for living in (FILL IN NAr-lE
OF COMMUNITY)?
QUALITY
4
A
3
B
2
C
1
D
o
F
8 9
DON'T RE-
KNCX'V FUSED
[J
Being near friends ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••18--
The opportunity to get a job••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••19--
The long-term economic opportunity ••••:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••20--
A chance to get away from urban problems ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••2l--
Having a challenging or exciting job ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••22----
Being close to a wilderness environment •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••23--
Having an opportunity to earn a high income •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••24--
Having a chance to be self-reliant,to live more
of a subsistence or pioneer's lifestyle •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••25--
Being part of a small community •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••26--
Being nearby hunting and fishing ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••27--
Being nearby outdoor recreational opportunities •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••28---
euriousity about Alaska 29---
SChool or military••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••30--
A chance to be independent,to start something new ••••••••••••••••••••••••••3l--
-14 -
20.Please tell me when each person living in your household was born and their gender or
sex.Please start with yourself..
(WRITE IN LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR OORN ON ANSWER SHEET)
DON'T KNOW ••••••(What is your best guess?)••••••98
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
(WRITE MALE FEMALE CODES ON ANSWER SHEET)
MALE •••ooo.oo •••••••••o ••••••••••••ooo.o ••o.l
FEMALE.o •••••0 ••0 ••••0.0 1)•••••00000 111.00000 Q.2
DON'T KNOW •••(WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?)•••••8
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR BORN FOR RESPONDENT .32-33--
SEX OF RESPONDENT 34--
LAST '1WO DIGITS OF YEAR OORN FOR PERSON #2..35-36-
SEX OF PERroN #2 37--
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR BORN FOR PERSON #3,.38-39--
SEX OF PERSON #3 40--
LAST '1WO DIGITS OF YEAR BORN FOR PERSON #4'--__,41-42--
SEX OF PERSON #4 43-
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR BORN FOR PERSON #5'--__,44-45--
SEX OF PERSON #5 46--
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR OORN FOR PERSON #6,,47-48--
SEX OF PERSON #6 49--
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR OORN FOR PERSON #7 .50-51--
SEX OF PERSON #7 52--
DIGITS OF YEAR OORN FOR PERSON #8,__-,53-54--
SEX OF PERSON #8 55--
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR OORN FOR PERSON #9__-,56-57--
SEX OF PERSON #9 58--
LAST 'lWO DIGITS OF YEAR OORN FOR PERSON #10__-,59-60--
SEX OF PERSON #10 61--
tMT"OODIGIT,s OF YEAR BORN FOR PERSON #11 62-63-
_________________----:SEX OF PERSON #11,,64--
21.How many total years of education have you completed?(FORMAL ATTENDANCE IN SCHOOL)
(EIGHTH GRADE =8;HIGH SCHOOL =12;TRADE SCHOOL =14;COLLEGE GRADUATE -FA OR BS =16;
MASTERS DEGREE =18;UlWYER,OOC'IOR,PH.D =19)
YEARS OF EDUCATION'--,.--__65-66--
REFUSED •••.•00·0 0.0.Oil 00·0.·0 GO ••.••0 • 0 •••II 0 •.~.~·~99
LEAVE '!HIS COLUMN BU\NK 67-
-15 ....
1
I
I
I
lJ
The last few questions are being collected purely for statistical purposes.
23.During 1984,how many individuals in your household worked fulltime 35 or rore hours
per week?
NUMBER OF FULLTIME ~nRKERS,--68-69-
OON'T :KNeW •••(WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?).•••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••OJ ••0 ••••••99
23b.How many part-time,34 or less hours?
NUMBER OF PART-TIME IDRKERS'---70-
NONE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••00
OON'T :KNeW •••(WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••0 •••••••011 0 099
24.During 1984,how many total m::mths was everyone in your household employed?(ADD ALL
HOUSEHpLD MEMBERS 'IOOETHER)
'IDTAL NUMBER OF MON'IHS,71-n-
OON'T :KNeW •••(What is your best guess?)••••98
REFUSED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••99
25.Are you presently seasonally employed,annually employed,unemployed and looking for
oork,not looking for work,or retired?
SEASONALLY EMPLOYED •••••••••••••••••••••••••1
ANNUALLY EMPLOYED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••2
UNEMPLOYED AND IDOKING FOR ~DRK •••••••••••••3
~LOOKING FOR IDRK •••••••••••••••••••••••4
RE'I'I.RED 5
73-
REFUSED 9
26.Including only those presently living at home,what was your total household income
for 1984,before taxes and other deductions were made?Please tell me the figure to the
nearest thousand dollars.(WRITE IN,TO '!HE NEAREST '!'HOUSAND OOLIARS,'!'HE NUMBER ON '!HE
ANSWER SHEET)
xxx '!'HOUSAND OOLIARS.74-75-76-
OON'T KNOW •••(What is your best guess?)•••998
REFUSED •••••••••••••(ASK COL 59-)•••••••••999
26b.We don't need the exact dollar figure;could you tell me which of these
broad categories it falls in •••
Less than 16,000 dollars,•••••••••••••••••••l
Between 16,000 and 25,000 dollars,••••••••••2
Between 26,000 and 35,000 dollars,••••••••••3
Between 36,000 and 45,000 dollars,••••••••••4
Between 46,000 and 55,000 dollars,••••••••••5
Between 56,000 and 65,000 dollars,••••••••••6
Between 66,000 and 75,000 dollars,or •••••••7
More than 75,000 dollars?••••••••••••••••••8
77-
REFUSED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••9
27.Is your telephone number ••••••••••••••
Listed or •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l
Unlisted 0"2
78-
OON'T KNOW •••(WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?)•••••8
REFUSED 9
-16 -
18.What is the likelihood that you,or someone else in your household,will go sports
fishing this year?Would you say it is very likely,somewhat likely,somewhat unlikely,or very unlikely?
VERY LIKELY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1
SOMEWHAT LIKELY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••2
SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••3
VERY UNLIKELy •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••4
I
OON'T KNCW ••••(What is your best guess?)••••8
REFUSED····················•...............•9
79-
28B.(IF VERY UNLIKELY,THEN SKIP THIS QUESTION)May we call you in a few
IlOnths for another survey for the State about 'sports fishing?
I80-
'YEs •••••0 a 0 ••••a 0 •••0 ....0 ••••••1;1 a_o ••••••••••1
0000 •••0 a 0"0 ..0.,1)••••0 (I 0.0 ••••0 ••••••••••••••2
OON'T KNOV •••(WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?)•••••8
REFUSED ....1:1 •.,•••110 0 ••••0 •••a •••1;1 •••••••••••••9
THIS COMPLETES THE SURVEY,'l'HANKYOU VERY MUCH FOR HELPING US -OOODBYE
lj
-17 -
II'!
EXHIBIT B
LIST OF TABLES
Table B.1.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Hunting by Area . . .....•..B-14
Table B.2.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Hunting by Area B-1S
Table B.3.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Hunting by Area . ....,...B-16
Table B.4.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Hunting by Area . . ....",.B-17
Table B.S.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Hunting by Area .,...,B-18
Table B.6.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Hunting by Area ........B-19
Table B.7.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Hunting by Area . . . , . . . . , .B-20
Table B.8.Susitna Hydroelectric Project",Number of
Rural Households Hunting by Area . . . . •..., .B-21
Table B.9.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Moose Hunting by Area . . • . . • . .B-22
Table B.10.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Moose Hunting by Area .••..B-23
Table B.l1.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Moose Hunting by Area . . . . , . .B-24
Table B.12.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Moose Hunting by Area .....B-2S
Table B.13.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Moose Hunting by Area . • . .B-26
Table B.14.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Moose Hunting by Area .....B-27
Table B.lS.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Moose Hunting by Area..,...B-28
Table B;l6.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Moose Hunting by Area . . . . . .B-29
B-1
Table B.17.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of All Households Caribou Hunting by Area......B-30
Table B.18.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Number of
All Households Caribou Hunting by Area B-31
Table B.19.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of Urban Households Caribou Hunting by Area .....B-32
Table B.20.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Number of
Urban Households Caribou Hunting by Area .....B-33
Table B.21.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of Small Town Households Caribou Hunting by Area . . .B-34
Table B.22.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Number of
Small Town Households Caribou Hunting by Area . . . . .B-35
Table B.23.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of Rural Households Caribou Hunting by Area .....B-36
Table B.24.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Number of
Rural Households Caribou Hunting by Area .....B-37
"j
Table B.25.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of All Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . . . .B-38
Table B.26.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Number of
All Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . . . . .B-39
Table B.27.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of Urban Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . . .B-40
Table B.28.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Number of
Urban Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . • . .B-41
Table B.29.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
...______________..of _~~all..!~~~~us_eh~lds Shee~~~1i1~!!~1:>r_!.t."~~=~?.._
------TaDle!I~_:_30-.-Sus1tna HyoroelectricProject.Number of
Small Town Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . .B-43
Table B.31.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of Rural Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . . .B-44
Table B.32.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area . . . .B~45
Table B.33.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of All Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area . . . • .B-46
B-2
,\
1,-\
1J
(
"
I
./
Table B.34.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area......B-47
Table B.35.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area . . . .B-48
Table B.36.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area .....B-49
Table B.37.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Brown Bear Hunting
by Area . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . ........B-50
Table B.38.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town-Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
Table B.39.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
.B-51
.B-52
I
.J
Table B.40.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area .....B-53
Table B.41.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Black Bear Hunting by Area . . . . .B-54
Table B.42.Susitn~Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Black Bear Hunting by Area......B-55
Table B.43.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Black Bear Hunting by Area . . . .B-56
Table B.44.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Black Bear Hunting by Area . . . . . .B-57
Table B.45.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Black Bear Hunting
by Area ~. . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . • . . . .B-58
Table B.46.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Black Bear Hunting by Area . . .B-59
Table B.47.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Black Bear Hunting by Area . • . .B-60
Table B.48.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Black Bear Hunting by Area . . . . . .B-61
Table B.49.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Small Game Hunting by Area . . • . .B-62
B-3
Table B.SO.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Small Game Hunting 'by Area ...•...B-63
.(\
\
Table B.Sl.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Small Game Hunting by Area . . . .B-64 Ii
,.I
Table B.S2.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Small Game Hunting by Area ...•.B-65
Table B.S3.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Small Game Hunting
by Area . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B-66
Table B.S4.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Small Game Hunting by Area . . .B-67
\
t
\
Table B.SS.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Small Game Hunting by Area . . . .B-68
Table B.6l.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Fishing by Area .••...B-74
Table B.S6.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Small Game Hunting by Area .....B-69
Table B.60.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Fishing by Area . . .....•..B-73
Table B.S7.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
of All Households Fishing by Area . . . . . . . .B-70
,I
i
"J
I
I
,(
!'I
B-7S
. .B-76
Table B.62.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
,Small"TownHouseholdsFisning~bY.Ai·ea:::~.. • .
Table B.S8.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Fishing by Area . . . . . . • . • . . .B-7l
Table B.S9.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage
,of Urban Ii~tll;~~ol.lif;~:n~hi..ng QyAr~~LL'"•...~.~.B-72
Table B.63.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Ru~al Households Fishing by Area . . . . .
Table B.64.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Fishing by Area . • • • . . • . . . .B-77
Table B.6S.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Salmon Fishing by Area . . • . .B-78 !
I
Table B.66.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Salmon Fishing by Area • • . . . . . . .B-79
B-4
Table B.67.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Salmon Fishing by Area .....B-80
Table B.68.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Salmon Fishing by Area . .
Table B.69.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Salmon Fishing by Area
B-81
B-82
Table B.70.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Salmon Fishing by Area . . . . .B-83
Table B.7l.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Salmon Fishing by Area .....B-84
Table B.72.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Salmon Fishing by Area .......B-85
Table B.73.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households King Salmon Fishing by Area . . . . .B-86
Table B.74.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households King Salmon Fishing by Area .....B-87
1
i
,
I.I
I
.)
Table B.75.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households King Salmon Fishing by Area . . . .B-88
Table B.76.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households King Salmon Fishing by Area . . . . .B-89
Table B.77.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households King Salmon Fishing
by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....'". .'"B-90
Table B.78.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households King Salmon Fishing by Area . . .B-91
Table B.79.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households King Salmon Fishing by Area . . . .B-92
Table B.80.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households King Salmon Fishing by Area . . . . .B-93
Table B.8l.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . . . .B-94
Table B.82.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . . . . . .B-95
B-5
Table B.83.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . . .B-96
Table B.84.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . . . . .B-97
I 1
)
Table B.8S.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Other Salmon Fishing
by Area . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B-98
Table B.86.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . .B-99
Table B.87.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . . .B-IOO
Table B.88.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area . .~. .B-IOl /i
Table B.89.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Trout Fishing by Area . . . . . . . .B-I02
Table B.90.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Trout Fishing by Area .....B-I03
Table B.9l.Susitna HydrQelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Trout Fishing by Area......B-I04
B-6
Table B.96.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Trout Fishing by Area . . . . . .B-109
Table B.93.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Trout Fishing by Area • . . .B-I06
..B-107
. .B-108
Table B.92.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
llJ,"1:>a.nH9'Yst:tb_old_s Trout Fishing by Area .T'".B-IOS
Table B.97.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Grayling Fishing by Area .....B-IlO
Table B.94.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Trout Fishing by Area
Table B.98.Susitna Hydro~J,e~t:.ric.Project,Numberof
All Households Grayling Fishing by Area . . . . . . . .B-11l
Table B.9S.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,percentage _.._._.
······----····-·----·---·-of-RUral-Housenords-Trout-Frsliing by Area .-•...
Table B.99.Susitna Hydroelect~ic Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Grayling Fishing by Area . . . . .B-112
Table B.100.Susitna Hydroelect~ic Project,Number of
Urban Households Grayling Fishing by Area .....B-113
Table B.101.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Grayling Fishing by Area . . .B-114
Table B.102.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Grayling Fishing by Area . . . .B-115
Table B.103.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Grayling Fishing by Area . . . . .B-116
Table B.104.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Grayling Fishing by Area .....B-117
Table B.105.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area . . . .B-118
Table B.106.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area . . . . .B-119
B.112.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area . . . .B-125
B.107.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area . . .B-120
B.109.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Burbot or Cod Fishing
by Area . . . • . . . • . . • • . . . • . . . . .B-122
B.108.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area . . . .B-121
B.111.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area . . .B-124
B.110.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
small Town Households Burbot or Cod Fishing
by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . .B-123
B.113.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles
by Area . • . • . . . • . • . • . . . • . . . .B-126
Table
Table
Table
"'J
[
Tablej)
i I
I I
Table
Table
(Table:~•.1
Table B.114.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles
by Area . . . • . . • . • • . • . • • • • . . . . . . .B-127
B-7
I
Table B.IIS.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Using Summer Off-Road
Vehicles by Area . . . . . . . . . ........B-128
Table B.116.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urb~n Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles
by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......B-129
Table B.117.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Using Summer Off-Road'
Vehicles by Area . . . . . . • . • ........B-130
Table B.118.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Using Summer Off-Road
Vehicles by Area . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . .B-131
Table B.119.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles
by Area • . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . .. .B-132
Table B.120.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Using Summer off-Road Vehicles
by Area . • . . . . . . . . . . •.'. . ..'...•.B-133
Table B.121.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles
by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . .B-134
Table B.122.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All !I~:t:l~eJ:l<:ll~st,Jl:Ji.IlgWi.nteJ:'Qff:-Road V'ehicles,
by Area . . • . . . . • • . . . . . . • . . . . • . . .B-13S
Table B.123.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Using Winter Off-Road
Vehicles by Area . . . • . • . . . ........B-136
Table B.124.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles
Table B.12S.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Using Winter Off-Road
Vehicles by Area . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . .B-138
Table B.126.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Using Winter Off~Road
Vehicles'by Area • • . . • • • . . • • . . ...•..B-139
Table B.127.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles
by Area • • . . • • . . . . • . . . . • . . . . • • . .B-140
B-8
,)
J,I
1I!.,I
Table B.128.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles
by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......B-141
Table B.129.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Skiing by Area . ........B-142
Table B.130.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Skiing by Area . . . ........B-143
Table B.131.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Skiing by Area . . . . .B-144
Table B.132.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Skiing by Area.. ........B-145
Table B.133.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Skiing by Area ......B-146
Table B.134.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Skiing by Area . . . . •B-147
Table B.135.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Skiing by Area . . . . .B-148
Table B.136.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Skiing by Area . . ........B-149
Table B.137.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Boating by Area . ........B-150
Table B.138.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Boating by Area . . ........B-151
Table B.139.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Boating by Area ........B-152
Table B.140.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Boating by Area . ........B-153
Table B.141.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of small Town Households Boating by Area . . . . .B-154
Table B.142.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Boating by Area .......B-155
Table B.143.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Boating by Area •.......B-156
Table B.144.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Boating by Area . ........B-157
B-9
Table B.145.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Camping by Area . ..•.....B-158
i \
/f
Table B.146.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Camping by Area . . .••••...B-lS9
Table B.147.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Camping by Area .......•B-160
Table B.148.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Camping by Area . •.•.....B-161
Table B.149.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Camping by Area . . . . .B-162
Table B.lS0.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Camping by Area .......B-163
Table B.151.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Camping by Area ..•..•••B-164
Table B.lS3.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage of All
Hhlds Hiking,Picnicking,or Berrypicking by Area .B-166
.B-165
Table B.lS2.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Camping by Ar~a • • . .
Table B.lS4.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of All
Hhlds Hiking,Picnicking,or Berrypicking by Area .B-167
-_._-_.~.__._---___..".__....••.
~_..._...._._._._.._~.__._.-
TaoreB-:155.s't1si£na Hydroelectric Project,Percentage of
Urban Hhlds Hiking,Picnicking,or Berrypicking
by Area • • . • . • • • • • • ..•• . • • . . .B-168
Table B.lS6.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Hhlds Hiking,Picnicking,or Berrypicking
by Area • • . . • . . . • • • . • • . • . . . . . • . .B-169
----------Table-B...157-...--Susitna-Hydroerectric-Pro-ject-;-Percen€age
__________,of-Sma-l-l-Totffl-Hhlds-H-i-king-,-Prcnrcking-,-or---------
Berrypicking by Area . . . • • •.......B-170
Table B.lS8.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Hhlds Hiking,Picnicking,or
Berrypicking by Area . • • . . • • • . . •B-171
Table B.159.Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Percentage of
Rural Households Hiking.Picnicking,or
Berrypicking by Area . • . • • • . . • . .B-172
Table B.160.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Hiking,Picnicking,or
Berrypicking by Area . • • • • . . •.•...•.B-173
B-I0
.\
\
"/
I
:.1
)
~
1
)
.1
Table B.161.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Sightseeing by Area .......B-174
Table B.162.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Sightseeing by Area . . . . .B-175
Table B.163.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban ~ouseholds Sightseeing by Area ......B-176
Table
Table
I \
Table
Table
Table
I
)
B.164.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Sightseeing by Area . . . . .B-177
B.165.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Sightseeing by Area . . . . .B-178
B.166.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Sightseeing by Area .....B-179
B.167.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Sightseeing by Area ......B-180
B.168.Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Sightseeing by Area . . . . .B-181
B-11
'(
J
:I
)
::1
~.I
,}
l
i I
~.==....._....==--=:__==_.=.....:.__.,,=.,,==.==_=____=='J
\"
INTERPRETATION OF TABLES
IN EXHIBIT B
The tables in Exhibit E are paired.Tables on the left-facing page
contain percentages,and tables on the right-facing page contain the
corresponding absolute numbers.Both the percentages and absolute
numbers refer to one of four population groups:all study area
households,urban households,small town households,and rural
households.The table titles indicate which of the four population
groups is the subject of a particular table.
The percentages shown represent upper and lower bound estimates of
the true population percentage.The true population percentage
could only be determined if the survey sample included all
households.'The standard errors upon which the upper and lower
bound estimates were derived were calculated as follows:
sa =lPln'-Pl
where P equals the proportion observed in the survey
n equals the effective sample size and
se equals the estimated standard error
The estimated standard was multiplied by 1.96 and the product was
added to and subtracted from the observed survey percentage to
produce upper and lower bound percentage estimates.If the survey
were replicated an infinite number of times,the observed survey
percentages would fall within the reported range 95 percent of the
time.A more intuitive interpretation of the reported ranges is
that there is a 95 percent chance that the true population
percentage is contained within the range.
The absolute numbers reported are simply the product of the reported
percentages and the total number of households in the population
group.There are an estimated 122,753 households in the study area
as a whole,106,215 urban households,13,878 small town households,
and 2,660 rural households.
NOTE:
"Susitna study Area"in all tables in Appendix B
refers to the same area defined in the main body
of the report as the study Region (see Figure 3-1).
B-13
-/
J
I
)
t
l.1
Table B.l.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCAtION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or Oyt of Alaska 56.77.59.5i.50.97.53.77.40.6%43.4%
In Alaska 55.5%5B.3%50.4%53.2%40.57.43.3%
SYsitna StUdy Area 29.1%31.7'1.26.6%29.0i.20.7i.22.9i.
Area One 1.7%2.57.1.67.2.4%1.3%1.97-
Are.a Two 6.87.B.2%6.27.7.6i.4.9i.6.1i.
Area Three 4.5%5.77.4.0%5.27.2.8%3.8i.
Area FOIJr 0.57.0.97.0.4%0.8i.0.4%0.8i.
Area Five 1.27.1.8%1.07.1.67.0.9i.1.57.
Area Six 1.4i.2.2%1.3%2.1i:1.07.l.6i.
Area Seven 0.97.1.57.0.87.1.47.0.67.1.0i.
Area EiSht 0.1%0.37.o.n:0.37..07.0.2i.
Area Nine 0.7%1.3%0.6%1.2%0.4%0.87.
Area ten 0.17.0.5%0.1%0.57.0.1i.0.3%
Area Eleven .Oi.0.2%.0%0.2%.07.0.2i.
Area Twelve 0.1%0.37.0.1%0.3i..Oi.0.2i.
Area thirteen 4.7i.5.9%4.3%5.5i.3.4%4.4%
Area FOIJrteen 2.27.3.0i.1.9i.2.7i.1.5i.2.37.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.0%1.6%0.97.1.57.0.6i.1.27.
Anchorage/Chu9ach Htn.Area 2.2%3.07.2.0%2.8i.1.6i.2.47.
Kenai Peninsula 7.7%9.3%7.1%8.5%6.1i.7.57.
Copper R./Wrangel1/Valdez 1.3%2.17.1.1%1.7i.0.97.l.5i.
Southeast Alaska 0.9%1.5%0.97.1.5%•0.6%1.07.
Elsewhere in Alaska 1.5%2.3%16.4%18.47.12.9%14.9i.
Outside Alaska 2.4%3.4%1.3%1.9%0.5%0.9%
._.•._------..-_....
B-14
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.2.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 19BO -19B5 19B4
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Ahsk:a 69640 73000 62500 65900 498BO 53230
In Alaska 6B160 71530 61890 65280 49760 5311 0
Susi tna Study Are.3 35750 3BBBO 32600 35650 25360 28160
Area One 2090 3060 1980 2930 1540 2390
Area Two 8310 10100 7610 9330 59807530
Area Three 5510 7010 4930 6360 3440 4660
Are.3 FOIJr 5BO 1140 470 1000 470 1000
Area Five 1430 2250 1210 19BO 1100 1840
Area Six 1760 2660 1650 2530 1210 19BO
Area Seven 1100 1840 1000 1700 680 1280
Area Eight 90 400 90 400 20 230
Area Nine 890 .151.0..i'80 1430 ....470 .....1000-
.Are.i Ten 1BO 550 180 550 90 400
Area Eleven 20 230 20 230 20 230
Area Twelve 90 400 90 400 20 230
Area Thirteen 5740 7270 5280 6750 4130 5450
Area Fourteen 2650 3730 2310 3330 1870 2800
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 1210 1980 1100 1840 780 1430
Anchor.3ge/Chugach litn.Area 2650 3730 2430 3470 1980 2930
Kenai Peninsula 9490 11380 8660 10490 7490 .__.~AQQ ...
.....·Copper··R.IWr:;ngeHIV.31dez 1650··-2530 1320-·-212U ····--nOO 1840
Southe.ast-Alaskal------HOO-~1840----ltOO--1840'----6HO 1280-----
Elsewhere in Alaska 1870 2BOO 20070 22650 15890 18240
Outside Alask.3 2990 4130 1540 2390 5ao 1140
B-15
I
1
(
J
I \
I
)
).
f
)
1
.1.1
Table B.3.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Hunting by Area
!]
i \URBAN HOUSEHOLDSI
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~ska 54.2';58.4%48.2%52.4%37.6i.:41.8%
In Alaska 52.97.57.li.:47.5%51.7%37.57-41.77-
Susitna Study Area 26.57-30.3%24.07.27.8%IS.0i:21.47-
Area One 1.37-2.5';1.2%2.4%1.0%2.0%
Area Two 5.6%7.8i.5.17.7.17.3.8%5.6%
Area Three 3.8%5.67.3.47.5.2%2.2%3.6%
Area four 0.37-0.9%0.3%0.9%0.2i.0.8%
Area Five .0.97-1.9%0.7:<:1.7%0.77-1.57-
Area Six 1.2%2.2%1.0%2.0~0.77.1.77-
Area Seven 0.7%1.5%0.6%1.4%0.37.1.1i.
Area Eight .07.0.4%.0%0.4%.07.0.27-
Area Nine 0.6%1.4%0.5%1.3%0.3%1.17.
Area Ien O.lX 0.5%0.17.0.5%.Oi.0.4%
Area Eleven •Or.0.2%.07-0.2%.0%0.2%
Area Twelve .0%O.2Z .0%0.2%.Oi.0.2:1.
Area Thirteen 4.4%6.2%4.0%5.8i.3.07-4.67-
Area fOIJrteen 1.8%3.0%1.61.2.81.1.27.2.2k
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.8%1.8%0.8%1.8%0.5i.1.37-
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are~2.0%3.4%1.8i.3.2%1.5i.2.n
Kenai Peninsula 8.2%10.6%7.4%9.8%6.47.8.6%
Copper R./Wrangel1/Valdez 0.7%1.57-0.57-1.37-0.3i.1.1%
Southeast Alaska 0.8%1.8%0.87-1.8?0.5%1.3%
Elsewhere in A1ask~17.5%20.97-15.9%19.1i.12.4%15.4%
Outside Alas~,a 2.57-4.1%1.2i.2.47-0.47-1.27.
!
-)
B-16
Table B.4.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska575706203051180556803996044370InAlaska561806066050430549303986044260SusitnaStudyArea281303220025540294801913022720AreaOne140026301310251010502140AreaTwo599082405400756040405940AreaThree404059403650548023203840AreaFOIJr290980290980210850AreaFive960202078017607001640AreaSix12202390105021407801760AreaSeven700164061015103701120AreaEight10410104100250AreaNine61015105301380.310 11205607056010410AreaEleven025002500250AreaTwelve025002500250AreaThirteen462066404230618031804900AreaFOIJrteen18603240168030001220239010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy870189087018905301380Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 2140 3600 1950 3360 1580 2880KenaiPeninsula86701130078701040067809150~!J~P~!'Jt.jWr aI!g~lUV,~IdeL __.-100 .....--.··.1640---------530--~1-380·........-------370--1120·---_..._._._,"._..__•.._.~.•.._-._-----~----
Southeast Alaska 81.0__189_0 87-0--18~O 5-30--1-380ElsewhereinAlaska186202217016880203001321016320OutsideAlaska27004310131025104501250
B-17
I
1
I
)
I
!
)
)
1
1
)
Table B.S.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -i985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~64.7%68.9%61.47-65.67.52.1i.56.5%
In Alaska 64.4%68.67-61.1%65.3%52.U 56.5%
Susitn~Study Area 39.67.44.0%37.4%41.67-32.47.36.6i.
Area One 2.3%3.97.2.37-3.n 2.07-3.4%
Are.3 Two 11.07-13.8%10.57-13.37-9.1i.11.77.
Area Three 6.0%8.2%5.57.7.7%4.9i.6.97.
Areal:olJr 0.67.1.4%0.6i.1.4i.0.4i.1.27-
Area/Five 2.27.3.67-1.9i.3.3%1.67.3.0%
Are:;1 Six 1.9%3.3%1.8i.3.27.1.2i.2.47.
Area ,Seven 1.2%2.4%1.0%2.2%0.9%1.97.Area,,'Ei',3ht .0%0.47..07-0.47..0%0.47-
Area Nine 0.3%0.97.0.3%0.97-0.37-0.97-
Area Ten .07.0.27..O~0.27-.07-0.2i.
Area Eleven .0%0.47-.0%0.4%.07.0.4i.
Area Twelve 0.1%0.57-0.1%0.57.0.17-0.57.
Area Thirteen 4.0%6.0%3.9%5.n;3.37.5.1i~
Area FOIJrteen 2.9%4.57-2.6%4.2k 2.3%3.9%
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 0.3%1.1%0.37.0.97-0.37.0.9%
Anchorage/Chu9ach Htn.Area 1.07.2.2%1.07.2.27.0.97-1.9i.
Kenai Peninsula 2.37-3.7%2.2%3.67.1.9%3.3::::
Copper R.JWrangell/Valdez 4.4%6.4i.4.3i.6.3%3.5i.5.3i.
Southeast Alaska 0.1%0.7%0.1%0.7%0.1%0.57-
Elsewhere in Alaska 15.4%18.8%14.6%17.87.11.67-14.6i.
Outside Alaska 0.3%1.17.0.17.0.77..07.0.2%
B-18
Table B.6.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out ot Ahsk~8980 9560 8520 9110 7230 7840
In Alaska 8940 9520 8480 9060 7230 7840
Susitn:a Study Area 5500 6100 5180 5780 4500 5080
Area One 320 540 310 520 280 470
Area Two 1520 1920 1450 1850 1260 1630
Area Three 830 1140 760 1070 680 960
Area FOIJr 80 200 80 200 GO 170
Area Five 300 500 260 460 230 410
Area Six 260 460 250 440 170 330
Area Seven 170 330 150 300 120 270
Area Eight 0 50 0 50 0 50
Area Nine --/40-130--·40 13040 -130--.Area-Ter,.0 30 0 30 0 30
Area Eleven 0 50 0 50 0 50
Area Twelve 10 70 10 70 10 70
Area Thirteen 560 830 .540 800 460 710
Area FOIJrteen 400 630 360 580 320 540
10 Miles North ot Denali Hwy 50 150 40 130 40 130
Anchor·':lge/Ch'J9ach litn.Area 150 300 150 300 120 270
Kenai Peninsula 310 520}6-0~0~----8~70!0.----------------24-~O -.....4..
7
6
4
-0
0
-----_..-.·-·-··--'----·-····--···--·-----Copper--R-./Wrangel-l/Valdez----···-----GIO·-----890----------··;z
------Southeast--Alaska 20--90 20 9U 10 70
Elsewhere in Al~sk~2140 2600 2020 2470 1610 2020
Outside Alaska 50 150 20 90 0 30
B-19
1
1
I
1
t
!
)
:i
I\~
)
I
1
)
Table B.7.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOLl HIGH
In or out of Alaska 80.7%85.7%74.~1.BO,I%65.6i.:71.87-
In Alaska 80.1%85.1%74.1%79.7%65.5%71.7%
Susitna Study Area 44.7%51.3%40.1%46.n 33.6%40.01.
Area One 2.6%5.2%2.6i.5.2%2.0%4.2%
Area Two 12.0%16.6r.11.77.Hi.3%10.1i.14.5i.
Area Three 6.4%10.0%5.6%9.0i.4.77.7.9i.
Area tOIJr 0.2%1.2i.0.2%1.2%0.1%1.l.k
Area Five 0.9%2.7%0.8%2.6%0.8%2.67-
Area Si:<2.2%4.6i.1.3%3.3%1.2%3.0:G
Area Seven 1.0%2.8%1.0%2.8r.0.27.1.2:~.
Area Eight 0.0%0.3%0.0%0.3%0.0%0.3%.
Area Nine 1.1%2.9%0.3%1.5%0.2%1.47.
Area Ten 0.0%0.5%0.0r.0.5%0.0%0.5i,
Area Eleven 0.0%0.3%0.0%0.3%0.0%0.3%
Area Twelve 0.2%1.2%0.17-1.1%.0%1.01.
Area Thirteen 4.6%7.8%4.0%7.0%3.57-6.3%
Area FOIJrteen 2.5%4.9%2.1%4.5%1.6i.3.6%
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.5%1.9%0.5%1.9%0.5i.1.9%
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1.6%3.6%1.2%3.0%1.2%3.0%
Kenai Peninsula 1.0%2.8%1.0%2.8%0.6%2.2%
Copper R./Wrange11/Va1dez 3.4%6.2i.3.0%5.8%2.8i.5.4i.
Southeast Alaska 1.6%3.6%0.0%0.3%0.0%0.07.
Elsewhere in Alaska 13.5%18.3%17.0%22.2i.15.9%'l1.U
Outside Alaska 1.1%2.13%0.2%1.2%0.0%0.77.
B-20
Table B.B.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
I
1
I
)
I
,I
\.,
1984
LOW HIGH
1750 1910
1740 1910
890 1060
50 no
270 380
120 210
o 30
20 70
30 80
o 30
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
1980 2130
1970 2120
1070 1240
70 140
310 430
150 240
o 30
20 70
30 90
30 70
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER
LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 2150 2280
In Alaska 2130 2260
Susitna study Area 1190 1360
Area One 70 140
Area Two 320 440
Area Three 170 270
Area Four 0 30
Area Five 20 70
Area Six 60 120
Area Seven 30 70
Area Ei9ht 0 10
.Area-'Nine 30 80 40 10 40
Area Ten 0 10 0 10 0 10
Area Eleven 0 10 0 10 0 10
Area Twelve 0 30 0 30 0 30
Area Thirteen 120 210 110 190 90 170
Area Fourteen 70 130 60 120 40 100
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 10 50 10 50 10 50
Anchor.3ge/Chu9ach litn.Area 40 100 30 80 30 80I
____.J{enaLPeninsu1L .____-··30-·-······70-------30------70-----·--20---60---
Copper R./Wrangell/V.ltdez,9_0__110,80-~150 70--1-40,------
Southeast Alaska 40 100 0 10 0 0
Elsewhere in Alaska 360 490 450 590 420 560
Outside Alaska 30 80 0 30 0 20
i I
I j
I \
\-.-J
Table B.9.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Moose Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~41.1%43.9%37.07-39.67-27.67-30.27-
In Alask.3 40.6%43.4%36.5%39.17.27.47-30.07-
Susitna StUdy Area 24.9%27.37.22.4%24.87-16.3i.IS.3i.
Area One 1.47.2.27.1.3%2.1%1.Ii.1.77.
Are~Two 6.0%7.47-5.4i.6.87.4.1%5.37.
Area Three 2.7%3.7k 2.47.3.4%1.3%2.17-
Area FOIJr 0.57.0.9%0.4i.0.8%0.37.0.77.
Area Five 1.0%1.6%0.7k 1.3%0.6%1.07.
Area Six 1.1%1.7%0.97.1.57.0.6i.1.27.
Area Seven 0.67.1.27-0.57.0.9%0.3%0.77-
Are.3 Ei9ht .0%0.2%.0%0.2%.Oi.0.27-
Area Nine 0.77.1.37.0.67-1.0%0.47-0.87.
Area Ten 0.17-0.3%0.17.0.37-.07-0.27.
Area Eleven .0%0.27..0%0.2%.0%0.2%
Area Twelve O.lk 0.3%0.17-0.3i.0.17-0.37-
Area Thirteen 5.2%6.47.4.S%6.07-3.47.4.47-
Area FOIJrteen 1.3%2.17-1.3%1.9%1.0i.1.67-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.77.1.37.0.7%1.37.0.57.0.9i.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1.2%l.S7-1.07.1.67.0.77.1.37-
Kenai Peninsula 4.37-5.57.3.67.4.67.2.97.3.97-
Copper R./Wr~nge11/Valdez 0.97.1.5%0.67-1.2i.0.57-0.9i.
SQutheast Alaska 0.6%1.27-0.67-1.0%0.47.0.87-
Elsewhere in A1ask~14.17.16.17-12.77.14.7i.:9.47-11.0i.
Outside Alaska 0.2%0.67.0.1%0.5i..07.0.27.
B-22·
Table B.lO.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Moose Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -198S 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out ot Ahsk'2 50490 53850 45360 48670 33940 37020
In Alaska 49880 53230 447S0 480S0 33690 36770
SlJsitM StlJdy Area 30550 33530 27530 30410 19950 22520
Area One 1760 2660 1650 2530 1320 2120
Area Two 7380 9070 6670 8300 5050 6490
Area Three 3330 4530 2990 4130 16S0 2530
Area Four 580 1140 470 1000 370 850
Area Five 1210 1980 890 lS70 680 1280
Are::!Sb:1320 2120 1100 1840 780 1430
Are::!Seven 780 1430 S80 1140 370 850
--Are::!-Ei9ht--~20 .-230 ~20 .-230--20 ····230 .-
Area Nine 890 1570 680 1280 470 1000
Are::!Teo 90 400 90 400 20 230
Area Eleven 20 230 20 230 20 230
Area Twelve 90 400 90 400 90 400
Area Thirteen 6330 7910 5860 7400 4130 5450
Area FOlJrteen 16S0 2530 lS40 2390 1210 1980
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 890 lS70 890 1570 sao 1140
Aochorage{~hu9~C.~}-Ito.~e!..1430 225.0_..1210_-1980---.---890--1570---.-.--.----....
-------------Ke-nai Peninsula 5280 67S0 4360__5Z10 3560--4'7130'-----
Copper R-:/Wr::!nge11/Valdez 1100 1840 780 1430 580 1140
Southeast Alaska 780 1430 6aO 1280 470 1000
Elsewhere in Alask::!17320 19750 15650 17990 11490 13550
Outside Alaska 280 710 180 550 20 230
j
I
I I
I
l
I
1
I
l
I
I
I
Table B.ll.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Moose Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCAl ION EVBR 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 37.87-42.0i.33.67-37.6%24.4i:-iii l')'1
wClau/.
In Alaska 37.2i.41.4i.33.0i.37.01.24.U 27.9:r.
Susitna Study Area 21.6i.25.2';19.3i.22.7%13.3k 16.3%
Area One 1.07-2.0i:1.0i.2110%0.7%1.71.
'1 Area Two 4.6i.6.6!4.1i.5.91.2.9~4.51.
(I Area Three 2.1%3.57.1.87-3.2;~0.37-1.3i.
Area Four 0.3i.0.9i.0.3i.0.91.0.27-0.8i.
Are·3 Five o.n 1.57.0.41.1.27.0.37.1.11.
Are.3 Six 0.7%l.n:0.61.1.41.~4'f 1 ")'1•I..~'~--(!.~---
Area Seven 0.3i.1.17.0.37.0.97-O.:l7.~0.7:'
Area Ei9ht .Oi.0.27..Oi.0.21.:0.0i.0.01.
Area Nine 0.6i.1.47-0.4i.1.2%0.37.0.9i.
Area len .0%0.4i..Oi.0.41..Ok 0.27.
Area Eleven .Oi.0.27..Oi.0.27-.07.o 'i'/./W/.
Are.3 Twa 1ve '.07.0.2%.07.0.2%.07.0.27.
Area Thirteen 4.7%6.7%4.47.G.2%2.9%4.57-
Area Fourteen 1.0i.2.0i.1.07.2.0%o.n 1.7k
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.67-1.47.0.6%1.47.0.37.1.1i.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1.07.2.0i.0.81.1.8r.0.6i.l.::r~
Kenai Peninsul.3 4.47-6.2%3.57.5.37.2.8i.4.4k
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.4r.1.27.0.27.0.87.o.n O.7~
IJ Southeast Alaska 0.6i.1.47.0.57-1.37-0.37-1.17.
Elsewhere in Alaska 13.6i.16.6i.12.2i.15.2i.8.8%11.4~~
Outside Alas~.a 0.1i.0.77.0.1%0.7%.Oi.o 1"1.w""
I Iu
B-24
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.12.
Susitna Hydroelectric Proje~t,Number of
Urban Households Moose Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984
~H~~H~~H~
In or out of Alaska 40180 44580 35660 39970 25950 29920
In Alask.a 39540 43940 35030 39320 25640 29590
Susitna StlJdy Area 22950 26760 20470 24140 14120 17320
Area One 1050 2140 1050 2140 780 1760
Are:~Two 4910 6980 4330 6290 3080 4780
Area Three 2230 3720 1950 3360 870 1890
Area FOIJr 290 980 290 980 210 850
Area Five 700 1640 450 1250 370 1120
Area Six 780 1760 610 1510 450 1250
Area Seven 370 1120 290 980 140 710
Area Ei ght 0 250 0 250 0 0
_~Ar~eaNi~!___._~_HQ .1510 __..____4501250 290--.-980
Area Ten 10 410 10 410 0 250
Area Eleven 0 250 0 250 0 250
Area Twelve 0 250 0 250 0 250
Area Thirteen 5010 7100 4620 6640 3080 4780
Area FOIJrteen 1050 2140 1050 2140 780 1760
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 610 1510 610 1510 370 1120
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1050 2140 870 1890 610 1510
Kenai Peninsula 4620 6640 3750 5600 2980 4660
·-_·····_··~·_···~-_·_·eopper--R·,;lWrangeH1Valdez-······--··-~450-····_·1250·--~----~2rO--···~---850----···_·---T4r-····710·--·············
------SolJtheas-t~A1-ask_a &10 --1510 530--1380 370---r120--~·~_··~~····.
Elsewhere in Alask.a 14430 17650 13000 16100 9370 12080
OIJtside Alaska 140 710 140 710 0 250
J
l
I
1
)
\
I
I
J
I
I
'I
Table B.l3.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Moose Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~ska 54.4%58.87-50.n 55.Ii:41.07-45.47.
In Alaska 54.3%58.7%50.n:55.1%41.2%45.67-
Susitn~Study Area 37.9%42.3%35.47-39.67-29.2i.33.27-
Area One 2.4%4.0%2.37.3.97.2.07.3.47-
Area Two 11.37-14.3%11.0%13.87-9.0i.11.67-
Al'ea Three 4.6%6.6%4.0%6.07.3.57-5.37.
(]Are.:!Four 0.6%1.4%0.67-1.47-0.47-1.2i.
Area Five 1.9%3.37.1.67.3.07.1.37.2.57-
Area Six 2.07.3.47-1.87.3.2i.1.0i.2.27-
Area Seven 1.0%2.27.0.97-1.97.0.7%l.n
Area Eight .0%0.4%.07.0.4%.Oi.0.27-
Area Nine 0.3%0.9%0.37-0.97-0.3%0.9%
I
Area Ten 0.1%0.5%0.1%0.5%.07-0.27-
\J
Area Eleven .0%0.2%.07-0.2%.0%0.2%
Area Twelve .Oi.0.47-.07-0.47..07-0.4%
Area Thirteen 4.5%6.5%4.2%6.2%3.6%5.4h
Are.:!Fourteen 2.17.3.5%L8%3.27.1.5%2.77.
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 0.47-1.2%0.37.0.97.0.3%0.9i.
Anchor~ge/Chugach Mtn.Area 1.0%2.0%1.07-2.0%0.6%1.6i:
.{enai Peninsula 1.7%3.1%1.6%2.8%1.2%2.4%
Copper R./Wrangell/V~ldez 2.57-4.li.2.4%4.0%2.0%3.47.
Southeast Alaska .0%0.2%.0%0.2%.07.0.2i.
\J
Elsewhere in Alask~12.9%15.97-11.8%14.8%8.8%11.47.
Outside Alaska .0%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
1
1
IJ
"-._.--,".""."--.-,-._._-_._._--_...._--.__...-.
tJ
B-26·
GEOGRAPHIC LOCAl ION
Table B.l4.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Moose Hunting by Area
.SMALL lOWN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984
~H~~H9 ~H~
In or out of Ahska 7550 8160 7040 7650 5690 6300
In Alaska 7540 8140 7040 7650 5720 6330
Susi tna Study Area 5270 5860 4910 5500 4050 4610
Area One 340 550 .·320 540 280 470
Area Two .1570 1980 1520 1920 1240 1610~~b~~m ~~m m
Are.3 Four 80 200 80 200 60 170
Area Five 260 460 230 410 laO 350
Area Six 280 470 250 440 150 300
Area Seven ISO 300 120 270 100 230
Area Eight 050_~~-··050 030
-AreaHIne -40 130 40 130 40 130
Area Ten 10 70 10 70 0 30
Area Eleven 0 30 0 30 0 30
Area Twelve .0 50 0 50 0 SO
Area Thirteen 620 900 590 860 500 750
Are.3 Fourteen 290 490 250 \440 200 380
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 60 170 40 130 40 130
Anchor.3ge/Chugach /'Itn.Area 130 280 130 280 ~_~..22...__.J2iL
Kenai-·Peninsuloa------··240·..-430·~---~··-221f .390 170 330
------CoppeLR./Wr.::mgellJ.Valdez 350-----570 3"0--550 280 470
Southeast Alaska 0 30 0 30 0 30
Elsewhere in Al.3ska 1780 2210 1640 2050 1220 1590
Outside Alaska 0 30 0 0 0 0
·1
!
I
I
!
i l
(~1
I
l
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table B.lS.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Moose Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~73.3%78.9%67.7%73.n 54.07.60.6%
In Al.3ska 73.1%78.77.67.6%73.6%54.27-60.8ie
Susitna Study Area 57.97.64.3%52.47.59.07.41.37-47.97.
Area One 3.17.5.97.3.07.5.8%2.1%4.57.
Area Two 16.17.21.3%15.3%20.37.H.a7.16.4i.
Area Three 6.n:10.3%5.97.9.3%4.3%7.37.
Are~Four 0.77.2.37-0.67.2.0%0.5i.1.97-
Area Five 1.8%4.0%1.67.3.6%1.2%3 '1./.,;in
Area Six 2.57.5.17.1.67.3.87.1.17.2.9i.
Area Seven 2.n:4.5%2.07-4.4%0.9%2.77-
Are~Eight.0.07-0.77.0.0%0.77.0.0%0.7%
Area Nine 0.6%2.27.0.67.2.0%0.57.1.97.
Are~Ten 0.0%0.5%0.0%0.57.0.07.0.57.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.57.0.07.0.57.0.07.0.37.
Area Twelve 0.3%1.57-0.27.1.2%0.1i.1.1i.
Area Thirteen 7.8%11.8%6.9%10.77.6.l:'9.77.
Area Fourteen 3.07.5.6%2.8%5.4i.2.47.4.8i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.67.2.0%0.67.2.07.0.6%2.07-
Anchor~ge/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 1.6%3.8%1.57-3.5%1.17.2.97-
Kenai Peninsula 0.8%2.47.0.8%2.4%0.77.2.3i.
(J
Copper R./Wrangel1/Va1dez 3.57.6.3%3.17.5.97-2.67-5.2%
Southeast A1~ska 0.07.0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07.0.0%
Elsewhere in Alaska 15.9%21.1%14.77-19.77-10.8%15.27.
I 1
Outside Alaska 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%O.O?
IJ
IJ .......,.._.,_.----..~,._--._----_.._.._.__..__..,,--,.
B-28
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.l6.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Ru~al Households Moose Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
W~1~~~1~
~H~~H~~H~
In or out ot Ahsk.3 1950 2100 1800 1960 1440 1610
In Alaska 1940 2090 1300 1960 1440 1620
S'Jsitn.a St'Jdy Area 1540 1710 1390 1570 1100 1270
Area One 80 160 30 150 60 120
Area Two 430 510 410 540 310 440
Area Three 180 210 "160 250 110 200
Area Four 20 60 10 50 10 50
Area Five 50 110 40 100 30 80
Area Six 70 130 40 100 30 80
Area Seven 60 120 50 120 20 70
Area Eight 0 20 0 20 0 20
Area Nine 20 60 10 50 10 50
Area Ien _Q_IL_--0----10---0 -"--10AreaEleven010010010
Area Twelve 10 40 0 30 0 30
Area Thirteen 210 310 130 280 160 260
Are.lI Fourteen 30 150 70 140 60 130
10 Iiiles North of Denali Hwy 10 50 10 50 10 50
Anchorage/Chugach I1tn.Area 40 100 40 90 30 80
Kenai Peninsula 20 60 20 60 20 60
Copper R./WNngell/Valdez 90 170 80 160 __7_0 14_0 _
--------------Southeast-Alask-a------------O---------O-----------0---- ---0------0 0
-------Elsewhel'e-in-Alaska 4i!0--560 390--520 290 400
Outside Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
I I
I
,j
I
\I
;1
!
~
I
I
I
1
i
I
I
I
I,I
I
I
)Table B.17.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Caribou Hunting by Area
[1
I I
I I
I
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 19tH
[1
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 18.5%20.77.14.67.16.67.9.6%11.2k
In Alaska 18.3%20.5%14.4%16.4%9.57.ll.l;~
SIJsitna Study Area 8.U 9.77.5.8%'1 ry"l 4.17-I:'~l:1!
J awn .J .,':fi.
Are.3 One o 1:'/0.9%0.47-0.8%0.2%O.G7..;;)t.
Area Two o.n 1.37.0.6i.1.07.0.57-O.9Z
Are.3 Three 0.67-1.27.0.37.o.n O.~%0.67.
Area FOIJr 0.27.0.6%O.li.O.5~0.17-0""1•\oJ;'
Area Five 1.37.1.97.0.87.1.47-O.6X 1.07.
Area Sb:1.27.1.87.O.n.:1.37.O.4~O.8j~
Are..:l Seven 0.4%0.87.O.li.0.57-0.17.0.57-
Are:~Ei9ht 0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.0r.0.0;;
Area Nine 0.2%0.6%.07.0.2%0'/0.27..'"
Area Ten .Oi.0.2%0.07-0.07-0.0i.O.Oi.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07.O.OJ.
Are::!Twelve O.U 0.37.O.lh 0.3i..Oi.0..27-
Area Thirteen .0.7%1.3%0.67.1.2;~0.6Z 1.07.
Area Fourteen 0.1i.0.5i.0.1i.0.3i.0.17.0.3%
10 Miles Marth of Denali Hwy C.6i.1.27.0.6i.1.0i.0.37-o ryaJ•I ,fa
Anchorase/Chusach Mtn.Area 0.1i.0.3i..07-0.2i.0.07.O.O?
Kerlai Peninsula 1.27.1.8%0.9%1.5Z 0.57.o CI~.",.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.5%0.97.0.47-0.87.0.2%0.6%
Southeast Alaska 0.2%0.6%0.1%0.5?0.17.o ')./.w..
I I Elsewhere in Al::!ska 8.5i.10.17.7.2i.B.6i.4.9i.6.li.
IJ OIJtside Alaska 0.1%0.3%O.li.0.37..07.O.2;~
U
II --_.._---'...._---,~._.,_....__..•...".-.....
,J
B-30
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table BolBo
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Caribou Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984
~H~~H~~H~
In or out of Alaska 22710 25410 17920 20380 11730 13800
In Alaska 22470 25160 17680 20130 11610 13680
Susitna StlJdy Area 9960 11890 7140 8820 5050 6490
Area One 580 1140 470 1000 280 710
Area Two 890 1570 680 1280 580 1140
Area Three 780 1430 370 850 280 710
Area Four 280 710 180 550 90 400
Area Five 1540 2390 1000 1700 680 1280
Area Si:<1430 2250 890 1570 470 1000
Area Seven 470 1000 180 550 180 550
Area Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Nine _280 ..nO~20 230 20-.230
Area Ien---20 230 0 0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 90 400 90 400 20 230
Area Thirteen 890 1570 780 1430 680 1280
Area Fourteen 180 550 90 400 90 400
10 Miles North of Den.:lli Hwy 780 1430 680 1280 370 850
Anchorase/ChlJgach litn.Area 90 400 20 230 0 0
~enai peRn/i~SUl.a 11/V 1j ·_~548300__-.2121-54~OO··-·--~417000·-1108~0-00---~---·+8800-_-l!,A
l
··00--.-------..------··----·_-·-tiopper-awr.:lnge··a.ez--····_
------Southeast-Alaska 280---710 180--550 90 400
Elsewhere in Alaska 10430 12400 8780 10610 5980 7530
Outside Alaska 90 400 90 400 20 230
Table B.19.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Caribou Hunting by Area
B-32
Table B.20.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Caribou Hunting by Area
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of A1~ska
In Alaska
SYsitna Study Area
Area One
Area Two
Area Three
Area Four
Area Five
Area Six
Area Seven
Area Eight
Are.aNine ..
Area Ten
Area Eleven
Area Twelve
Area Thirteen
Area Fourteen
10 Hiles Harth of Denali HWy
Anchorage/Chugach Ktn.Area
Kenai Peninsula
...........-.~..---CopperR:-7Wr-:~gen7VardeZ
------Southeast-Ata-ska
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984
~H~~H~~H~
17900 21400 14120 17320 9170 11860
17800 21290 13920 17100 9170 11860
7380 9830 5110 7210 3650 5480
370 1120 210 850 140 71 0
530 1380 370 1120 370 1120
370 1120 140 710 70 560
70 560 70 560 10 410
870 1890 450 1250 370 1120
700 1640 370 1120 140 710
210 850 10 410 10 410
o 0 0 0 0 0
70 560 ··0·250 .O~-----0
o 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
10 410 10 410 0 250
700 1640 610 1510 450 1250
70 560 10 410 10 410
530 1380 450 1250 210 850
10 410 0 250 0 0
1130 2260 .azo_.,~189.0_~-~-----.-~"~~450--1250-~-_..~_
.-210--··-850----~·140 710 Z.0__56.0r _
210 850 140 710 10 410
8270 10850 7080 9490 4820 6870
10 410 10 410 0 250
I
I
I
l I
I
I
1
j
·-1
I
I
I
I
]
I
,·1
I
I I
1
I
Table B.2!.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Caribou Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 22.6%26.'Ii.18.14 21.5i.1l.0';14.0';
!I In Alaska 22.4%26.2';18.07-21.47-11.3i.:14.3~'
Ii Susitna Study Area 11.77.14.n 9.37.12.17-5.6%7.8klAreaOne0.47.1.2%0.3i.:1.17.0.37.(\q,
..I •.II.
Are::l Two 0.9i.1.9i.0.8i.l.87.0.3i.l.li~
Area Three 0.97.1.97.0.7%1.77.0.57.1.37-
Are::l tOIJr 0.27.0.87-0.1i.o.n .Oi.0.47.
Area Five 2.37-3.n 1.67.3.0%l.l~~'1 'J"oW.w/.
Are::l Six 2.47.4.0i.2.17.<f'1 1:"l.07.2.0i.';;•..110
Are::l Seven 0.5%1.3%0.37.0.9%0.1~0.57.
Area Eight 0.2i.0.8i.:0.17-0.5i.0.07-O.Oi:
I r,Area Nine .07.0.4%.0%0.2%.07.O.2~'I ,!Are::l Ten 0.0i:0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.0r.0.0::I J Area Eleven 0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.:().Ot.
Area Twelve .Oi.:O.2Z .07.0.2%.07.0.27.
Area Thirteen 0.27.0.87.0.2i.:0.8i..07-0.47-
Area FOIJrteen 0.1i.0.57..Ok 0.47..07.0.27-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.17.o.n 0.17.0.57-0.17-0.57.
Anchor::lge/Chug::lch Mtn.Area .Oi.0.27..07.0.27-.07.O.2k
Keo::li ·PeninsIJ1::l 0.1i.0.5%.0%0.4%0'/0.47.•ia
Copper R./Wrange11/V::lldez 1.0i.2.07.0.97-1.97-0.5i-1 .,~."n
Southeast Alaska .0%0.4%.07.0.47..07.O.4~'
Elsewhere in Alaska 9.1%11.n.:7.0i.9.47-4.17.6.17-
Outside Alaska .0%0.2%.0%0.2%0.0%0.0;'
B-34
Table B.ZZ.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Caribou Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska314036602510299015301940InAlaska311036302490298015701980SusitnaStudyArea16302040130016707801080AreaOneGO1705015040130AreaTwo12027011025050150AreaThree12027010023070180Are.:!Four 30 110 20 90 0 SOAreaFive310520230410160310AreaSi>:340 550 290 490 130 280AreaSeven70180401301070AreaEight30110107000AreaNine300-.30-Area Ten--0 0 0 0 0 0AreaEleven000000AreaTwelve030030030AreaThirteen3011030110050AreaFourteen107005003010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy209010701070Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0 30 0 30 0 30KenaiPeninsula1070050__.J___._50__---.---Copper-R./Wrange11/Va1dez---··.---130-----·--280------12(r-----270---.----------
70 180
---~---
So~theast-Alaska 0--50 0 50 0 50ElsewhereinAlaska126016309701310570840OutsideAlaska03003000
)
I,
I
'11"
'r
!~
\(
I
I
I (
Table B.23.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Caribou Hunting by Area
,
ii,
i)RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
\GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
.I LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 31.87::38.0k 24.5i.30.3i.14.07-18.81.
In Alaska 31.67::37.8!24.2i.30.0%l3.8k 18.6%
5usitna Study Area 19.2%24.6i.12.2%16.8;{7.Oi~10.87.
Area One 0.57::1.9i.0.5%1.9%.Oia 0.87.
Area Two 0.7i.2.3i.0.6i.2.0i.0.27-1.2k
Area Three 1.3%3.3%1 ').,3.0%0.57.1.9k...1.
Are:il EOIJr .Oi.l.0i.0.0i.0.5i.0.07-0.57.
Area Eive 2.77-5.3%2.07.4.47.1.27.3.07.
Area Six 4.1%7.D:2.3i.:4.77.1.6%3.67-
Area Seven 1.3i.3.37.0.37-1.57.0.17.1.1:~
Are.'il Eight 0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.
Area Nine 1.27.3.07.0.57-1.9i.0"1.07-•fa
Area Ten 0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07-
Area Twelve 0.1',:2.37..07.0.8%0.0i.O.7;~
Area Thirteen .07-0.87::.07.0.8%0.07-0.57.
Area EOIJrteen .97-0~87.0.07.0.3i.o.o'i.o.3i~
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.07.2.87.0.9%2.77.0.67.2.2j~
\Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area .Oi.0.87;;0.0i.0.77.0.07-0.0;'
iJ f{enai Peninsul.'il 0.0%0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07.0.0%
Copper R./Wrangel1/Valdez 2.57.4.97::1.8i.4.0i.0.67.')')'/a:..,;.,1.
Southeast Alaska 0.07.0.37::0.0i.0.3i.0.0i.0.3%
Elsewhere in Alaska l2.2i.lb.87::9.3%13.5%4.67.7.87.
OIJtside Alaska 0.07-0.57.0.07.0.3%0.07.O.3~
B-36
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.24.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Caribou Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAlask.3 840 1010 650 810 370 500
In Alaska 840 1010 640 1300 370 500
Susi tna Study Are.3 510 660 320 450 190 290
Area One 10 50 10 50 0 20
Area Two 20 60 10 50 0 30
.Area Three 30 90 30 80 10 50
Are.3 Four 0 30 0 10 0 10
Area Five 70 140 50 120 30 80
Area Six 110 190 60 130 40 100
Area Seven 30 90 10 40 0 30
Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 O_Q
Area Nine 30.ao~·10·~.50 0 30
·--AreaTen 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Twelve 20 60 0 20 0 20
Area Thirteen 0 20 0 20 0 10
Area Fourteen 0 20 0 10 0 10
10 Hiles Nor.th of Denali Hwy 30 70 20 70 20 60
Anchor.3ge/Chu9-3ch Mtn.Area 0 20 0 20 0 0
Kenai Peninsula 0 0 ~..L~__.O._-~-_._.~._._~O-._--O~..~.-~_.._..~...~._--Copper-R./WrangeH1Valdez·--·--·70-····130 50 no 20 60
1
------~~--Southeast_Alaska 0 ro~---~0-..........J~10~----0 10
Elsewhere in Alask.3 320 450 250 360 120 210
Outside Alaska 0 10 0 10 0 10
B-37
I I
I.J
Table B.2S.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of ~ll Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
I GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
J LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In Qr Qut Qf Alaska 9.0%10.6%6.3i.7.77-3.47-4.4i:
In Alaska 8.87.10.4%6.1%7.57-3.4%4.4%
Susitna Study Area 2.8%3.87.2.2%3.07-1.3%1.9%
Area One O.H 0.37..0%0.27..0%0.27-
(
Area TWQ 0.57.0.97.0.4%0.87-0.2%0.6%
Are.:!Three 0.4%0.87.0.3%0.7%0.1%0.3%.,Area tQIJr 0.1%0.37-•Or.O.2X .Oi.0.2%
Area Five 0.17.0.3%0.17.0.37-0.17-0.3%
Area Six 0.17.O.ti7-0.17-0.37-0.1%0.37-
Area Seven 0.17-0.3%0.1%0.3%.07-0.27.
Area Eight 0.07.0.07-0.07-0.07.0.0%0.07-
Area Nine 0.17.0.37..07.0.27.0.0%0.0%
Area Ten 0.07-0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07.0.07-
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07-0.0%0.0%
Are.:!Twelve 0.07.0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07-0.0i.
Area Thirteen 0.27.0.6%0.17.0.37-0.1i.0.37-
Area tQIJrteen O.D;0.37-.07.0.27-•Or.0.2i.
10 Miles NQrth Qf Denali Hwy .0%0.2%.0%0.27..0%0.27.
1 Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.6%1.07-0.47.0.87-0.27.0.6i.
\\Kenai Peninsula 0.77.1.3%0.4%0.87.0.1%0.57.
Copper R./Wrangel1/Va1dez 0.87.1.47.0.47.0.87-0.17.0.57.
Southeast Alaska 0.1%0.57.0.17.0.3%•or.O.2X
Elsewhere in Alaska 3.4%4.4%2.57-3.57-1.27-1.8%
Outside Alaska 0.1%0.3%.0%0.2%0.0%0.07.
B-38
Table B.26.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGH'LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutotAlaska11020130407730946041305450InAlaska10780127907490920041305450SusitnaStudyArea344046602650373015402390AreaOne904002023020230AreaTwo58011404701000,280 710AreaThree470100037095090400Are.3 Four 90 400 20 230 20 230AreaFive904009040090400AreaSi}:180 550 90 400 90 400AreaSeven9.0 400 90 400 20 230AreaEight000--- 0AreaNine2023000AreaTen000000AreaEleven000000Are.3 Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen2807109040090400Are.3 FOIJrteen 90 400 20 230 20 23010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy202302023020230Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area'680 1280 470 1000 280 lIQKenaiPeninsub___._____________·.890·.----1570-------470-----'-'ro-ou---.--laO _.---550
•....•--~--..•_-.~-_.--_._-~_.~--_._._,-_._-.__._--
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 1000--1700 47'0--1000 180 550SoutheastAlaska1805509040020230ElsewhereinAlaska413054503100426014302250OutsideAlaska904002023000
,.--_---_.,•......•_...••-_•.."....•.•_---.,.-.,_.~.
B-39
\ I
,I
r
I
"\
}
[
'?
('.!
\
.1
I)
Table B.27.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 7.77-10.1%5.2%7.2%2.7%4.3%
In Alaska 7.5%9.9%5.1%7.1%2.7%4.3%
Susitna Study Area 2.3%3.7%1.7%2.9%1.0%2.0i.
Area One .0%0.2%.0%0.27.0.07.0.0%
Area Two 0.3%1.1%0.3%0.97-O.li.0.7i.
Area Three 0.1%0.77.0.1%0.5%.07.O.2i:
Are.'3 Four .0%0.4%.0%0.2%0.07-0.07-
Area Five .0%0.4%.07.0.47.•Or.0.47.
Are.'3 Six •Or.0.4%.Oi.0.4i.•Or.0.47-
Area Seven .Or.0.4%.0%0.4%.07.0.27.
Area Eight 0.0%0.0%0.0i. 0.0i.0.0%0.07-
Area Nine •Or.0.4%.0%0.2%0.0%0.07.
Area Ten 0.07.0.07.0.0%0.07.0.0%0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.0%0.0%
Area Twelve 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0%0.0i.0.0i.
Area Thirteen 0.1%0.7%.0%0.4%.07.0.47.
Area Fourteen .0%0.4%.0%0.2%0.0i.0.07.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .0%0.2%.0%0.2%.0%0.27.
-1 Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.37-1.1%0.3%0.97.0.17.0.77.
Kenai Peninsula 0.6%1.4%0.3%1.1%0.1%0.57.
Copper R./Wrangell/Va1dez 0.47.1.27.O.U 0.57..07.0.4%
Southeast Alaska 0.1%0.5%.0%0.4%.0%0.27.
Elsewhere in Alaska 2.8%4.4%2.1%3.5%0.9i.1.97.
Outside Alaska .0%0..4%.0%0.2%0.07.0.0%
B-40
Table B.28.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
o 0 0 0
o 0 0 0
10 410 10 410
o 250 0 0
o 250 0 250
290 980 140 no
370 1120 70 560
70 560 ..._.__tlL ...J10...__..
ro~mr--"0 250
2230--3720 960 2020
o 250 0 0
EVER
LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 8170 10740
In Alaska 7970 10510
Susitna Study Area 2420 3950
Area One 0 250
Area Two 370 1120
Area Three 140 no
Are:~Four 10 410
~~~"W m
Area Six 10 410
Area Seven 10 410
Area Eight 0 0
Area Nine 10 410
Area Ten 0
Area-Eleve'ri------0
Are.'i Twelve 0 0
Area Thirteen 140 710
Area Fourteen 10 410
10 Hiles North of Dena1iHwy 0 250
Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area 370 1120
Kenai Peninsula 610 1510
Copper R./Wrange11/Va1dez 450 1250
-Southeast.Alaska______...··-70··'-560"--
_____-=E~ls~eC!!!wh:"'e.....,re'_::"'in Alaska--:..----2980--4660
Outside Alaska 10 410
B-4l
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
5500 7670
5400 7560
1770 3120
o 250
290 980
70 560
o 250
10 410
10 410
10 410
o 0
o 250
1984
LOW HIGH
2890 4540
2890 4540
1050 2140
o 0
140 710
o 250
o 0
10 410
10 410
o 250
o 0
o 0
j
\}
)
}
'.
I
Ii
I
j
(
l
!
./
i
L
Table B.29.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
SHALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 13.3%Hi.5%10.2%13.0%5.74 7.97-
In Alaska 13.3%16.5%10.2%13.0%5.8%B.O%
Susitna Study Area 3.9%5.n:3.2%5.0%1.S%3.27-
Area One 0.1%0.5%.07-0.47-.07-0.47-
Area Two 0.5%1.37-0.37-1.1%0.1%0.5%
Area Three 1.3%2.5%1.07-2.2%0.5%1.37-
Area Four 0.1%0.5%0.1%0.57-.0%0.47-
Area Five .07-0.4%.0%0.47-.0%0.2%
Area Six 0.3%0.9%0.3%0.9%0.1%0.77-
Area Seven 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0r.0.0%0.07-
Are::!Eight 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.07-0.0%0.07-
Area Nine 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0r.0.0r.0.07-
Area Ten 0.0%0.07-0.07-0.0%0.0r.0.07-
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.07.0.0%0.07-0.07.
Area Twelve .0%0.2%0.0r.0.07.0.0r.0.07.
Area Thirteen .0%0.4%.0%0.4%.07-0.47-
Area Fourteen 0.1i.0.5%0.1i.0.57-.0%0.4i.
10 Miles North of Denali.Hwy .07-0.4%.07-0.4%.0%0.47-
Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area 0.3%1.17-0.3%1.1%•Or.0.4i.
Kenai Peninsula 0.5i.1.37-0.37-0.97-0.1i.0.57-
Copper R./Wrangel1/Va1dez 1.87.3.2%1.3%2.57-0.8%loBi.
Southeast Alaska .07-0.4%.Or.0.27-.07.0.27-
Elsewhere in Alaska 5.0i.7.0i.3.7%5.5%1.B%3.2i.
Outside Alaska •Or.0.2%.0%0.2%.0%0.27-
I iI
I
..'
B-42
Table B.30.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
\l
\(
r
1...I
;
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 1850 2280 1410 1800
In Alask.3 1850 2280 1410 1300
Susitna Study Area 540 800 450 690
Area One 10 70 0 50
Are·3 Two 70 180 50 150
Area Three 130 350 150 300
Area FOIJr 10 70 10 70
Area Five 0 50 0 50
Are::!Si>:40 130 40 130
Area Seven 0 0 0 0
Are::!Eight 0 0 0 0
AI:eaJ~ine __..~...~-_.__..•~-_........_._.._._.__._..._......."~---0 0
Area Ten 0 0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 30 0 0
Area Thirteen 0 50 0 50
Are::!I:oIJrteerl 10 70 10 70
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0 50 0 50
Anchorage/Chu'j::!ch Mtn.Area 50 150 50 150
Kenai PeninslJla 70 180 _4t_~__nO'-Copper ..R~iWrir;geIi7V:il;jez~-----,.~----_._...._.._-.--.---_._--_._.-.------~---~---_...,
250 440 180 350
0 30
Elsewhere in AlasK::!690 980 510 770
Outside Ahska 0 30 0 30
B-43
I
1984
\LOW HIGH
790 noo
800 1110 I'250 440 \.1050
10 70
,()70 130
o·50
0 30
20 90
..f00
O·0
0 0 I
0 0 I
0 0 ,
1·
0 50
0 50
0 50
0 50
\___.___1.Q 7.0.no 250
0 30 I250440
0 30
,I
. I
t
!
I
t l
I
Table B.31.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of 'Rural Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1~sk~-16.2%21.4%10.3i.14.7%2.7%co ,,",oJ.W/.
In Alaska 16.2%21.4%10.3%14.n 3.0%5.6%
Susitn~Study Area 4.5%7.7%3.57.6.3%0.6%2.07.
Area One O.U loU O.li!1.1%0.07-0.37-
Are.~Two 0.3%1.n 0.37.1.77.0.07.0.3i.
Area Three 1.2%3.2%0.8%Vi%.0%1.07-
Are~four 0.0i.0.7i.0.07-0.7%0.07.O.n.:
Area five 0.07-0.5%0.0%0.3%0.07-0.3i.
Are~Si}:0.1%1.1%.Oi.0.8i.0.0%0.3i.
Area Seven 0.07-0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Are.~Ei9ht 0.07.0.0i.0.0%0.0i.0.0%0.0i.
Area Nine 0.0%0.7%0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.
Area Ten 0.0%0.0i::0.0%0.0i.0.0%0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.5%0.0%0.5i.0.0%0.07-
Area Twelve O.Oi.O.3i.O.Oi.0.0i.0.0%0.0%
Area Thirteen 0.0%0.7%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.0i.
Area fourteen 0.0i.0.5i.0.07-0.57-0.0%0.37-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.0%0.3%0.07.0.3%0.07-0.37.
Anchar~ge/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 1.2%3.07.1.2i.3.07.0.3%1.57.
Kenai Peninsula -0.2%1.2%•Or.1.0r..0%0.87.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 4.2%7.2%2.5r.4.97..07.1.0%
Southeast Alaska 0.67.2.0%0.0%0.3%0.0r.0.07.
Elsewhere in Alaska 2.7%5.3%1.4%3.4i.0.3%1.5%
Outside Alaska 0.0i::0.0%0.0%0.0r.0.07-0.07.
B-44
Table B.32.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of .
Rural Households Sheep or Goat Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutotAl~sk~430 570 270 390 70 140InAlaska430570270390SO150SusitnaStudyArea120200901701050AreaOne030030010Are.:!Two 10 40 10 40 0 10Are.:!Three 30 80 20 70 0 30AreaFOIJr020020020Are~Five 0 10 0 10 0 10Are~Si:<0 30 0 20 0 10AreaSeven000000AreaEight000000Are~Nine 0 20 0 0 0 0Are~Ten 0 0 0 0Arlta~Ele'len.__~O·10'0 0Are.:!Twelve 0 10 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen02001000Are~Fourteen 0 10 0 10 0 1010MilesNorthotDenaliHwy010010010Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 30 SO 30 BO 10 40KenaiPeninSUla030030020CopperR./Wr~ngelI/Valdez .110 190 70 130 0 30'Southeast Alaska ........-19_.5(L .._.._._...._---..·-·0··....-·.....-10·..--------0-·---0-··-···----Elsewher-eTifAlasK.i···---·70 140 40 90 10 40------··..Outside-Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-45
if
)
1I
.!
)
}
J
I
.I
,.(
)
!
I
)
I (
J
Table B.33.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 6.7%8.Ii::5.4%6.8%3.6%4.87.
In Alaska 6.6%8.0%5.4:4 6.8%3.6%4.87.
5usitna Study Area 2.4%3.4%2.37.3.1%1.57-2.37-
Area One 0.2%0.6%0.27-0.6%0.1%0.57-
Area Two 0.3i.0.77.0.37-0.77-0.17-0.37-
Area Three 0.1%0.5%0.1%0.5%O.l:'0.37-
Area FOIJr .07-0.27-.0%0.2%0.07-0.07.
Area five 0.1%0.3%0.1%0.3%0.1%0.3:t
Area Six .0%0.2%.07-0.27..07.O.2X
Area Seven 0.1%0.37-.0%0.2%.07-0.•2:
Area Eight 0.0%0.0%0.07-0.0:0.0%0.0%
Area Nine .0%0.2%.0%0.2%.0.0%0.07.
Area Ten 0.0i.0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07-0.07-
Area Eleven 0.07-0.0%0.0r.0.0%0.0%0.07-
Area Twelve 0.07-0.0i.0.07-0.0%0.0%0.0%
Area Thirteen 0.5%0.9%0.5%0.9i.0.4%0.8%
Are.'iI Fourteen .0%0.2%.Oi.0.27-.07-0.27-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.1%0.3%0.1%0.3%0.17-0.3%
Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area 0.17-0.3i..07-0.2%.0%0.27.
Kenai Peninsula O.B%1.4%0.7%1.37.0.4%0.8%
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez O.D.:0.5%0.1%0.5%0.1%0.37.
Southeast Alaska 0.1%0.5%0.1%0.3%.0%0.2%
Elsewhere in Alaska 2.8%3.8i~2.2%3.0%1.4%2.2%
Outside Alaska .0%0.2%.0%0.27.0.0r.0.07.
B-46
Table B.34.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,.Number of
All Households Brown Bear Hunt~ng by Area I
I,,I
:}
.)
\.)."
,)
r
!
J
'I
11
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOUHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska819099706670830044705840.In Alaska 8080 9840 6670 8300 4470 5840SusitnaStUdyArea299041302760386018702800AreaOne280710280710ISO550AreaTwo37085037085090400AreaThree18055018055090400Are.:!FOIJr 20 230 20 230 0 0AreaFive904009040090400AreaSb:20 230 20 230 20 230AreaSeven904002023020230Are.:!Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine202302023000AreaIen000000AreaEleven0.---Area--Twelve---.-_.~---_......_.---"0 0 0 0 0 0
.._._.__..._----_...
Area Thirteen 580 1140 580 1140 470 1000AreaFOIJrteen20230202302023010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy904009040090400Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 90 400 20 230 20 230KenaiPeninsula1000170089015704701000CopperR./Wrangell/Valdez 180 550 180 550 90 400SoutheastAlaska18055090400______________~Q_.______230___~l s~~.r~_jnJUaska ...______~····--3440-··--4660----··--.-2650---S730 1760OutsideAlaska
B-47
II
Table B.35.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 5.9%8.1%4.1%6.17-3.17-4.17.
In Alaska 5.77.7.9%4.1%6.17.3.27.4.87.
Susitna Study Area 1.9%3.3%1.8%3.0%1.27.2.47.
Area One 3.2%4.8%0.17-0.5%0.17.0.57-
Area 'fwo 3.27.4.87.0.17.0.17..0%0.21.
Area three,2.3%3.1i..0%0.47..0%0.2%
Area tour 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0i-0.07.
Area tive 1.47.2.67..07.0.47..07.0.47-
Area Six 0.6%1.41..07.0.27.•Or.o ?'f..../0
Area Seven 1.47.2.67..07.0.27-.07.0.27-
Area Eight 0.0%0.0%0.07-0.07.0.0r.0.07-
Area Nine 0.07.0.0%0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07-
Area Ten 0.0%0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0r.0.01.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0i-0.0r.0.01.
Area Twelve 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.07.0.0r.
'Area Thirteen 0.3%1.1%0.37-loU 0.3%0.9%
Area tourteen .07.0.27..0%0.2%•Or.0.21.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .0%0.4%•Or.0.4%.0%0.47-
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area •Or.0.4%0.0i-0.0%0.0r.0.07-
Kenai Peninsula 0.7%1.57-0.6%1.47-0.37-1.1%
Copper R.lWrangell/Valdez',.07-0.47-.0%0.47-•Or.0.2r.
Southeast Alaska 0.1%0.5%.0%0.47-.0%0.27-
Elsewhere in Alaska 2.5%3.9%1.8%3.2%1.27-2.2%
Outside Alaska .0%0.2%.0%0.2%0.0%0.0r.
(
.:
B-48
Table B.36.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska62908580501071003270'5010InAlaska609083605010710033705130SusitnaStudyArea205034801860324013102510AreaOne337051307056070560AreaTwo337051301407100250AreaThree24203950104100250Are.3 Four 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaFive149027501041010410AreaSi:<610 1510 0 250 0 250AreaSeven1490275002500250Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine000000AreaTen000·~~~Area-Eleven 0 0 0AreaTwelve000000AreaThirteen370H2O370H2O290980AreaFourteen02500250025010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy104101041010410Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area 10 410 0 0 0 0KenaiPeninsul.3 700 1640 610 1510 370 1120CopperR./Wrangel1/Va~dez 10 410 10 410 0 250SoutheastAlaska_..---,~...._"._-_._-_____.70_._560.._.-~-_···-·---·--10~----~410---·------·0---250-·---"--------~-.Elsewhere in~Alaska 2610 419.0 1950-3360 1~20--2-390OUtsfdeAlaska0250025000
B-49
[
..../
',
J
.1
!
\)
.J
J
!
}
1
((
'..1
.J
rl
1
Table B~37.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~8.6%11.2%7.3%9.7%4.7%6.77.
In Alaska 8.7%11.3i.7.4%9.8i.4.9%6.97.
Susitn~Study Area 3.4i.5.2%3.1%4.9%2.1%3.5%
Area One 0.3%0.9%0.3%0.97.0.1%0.7:'
Are.:!Two 0.4%1.2%0.37.1.Ii.0.17-0.57-
Area Three 0.3%0.9%0.3%0.9%0.2%0.37.
Area Four .Oi.0.27..Oi.0.2i.0.07-0.0i.
Area Five 0.27-0.8%0.2%0.8%.Oio 0.47.
Area Six .07.0.47..0%0.4i..Oi.0.47.
Area Seven 0.0i.0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07.
Area Ei~ht .0%0.47..07.0.47..07.0.27.
Area Nine .0%0.27..0%0.27..07.0.2%
Area Ten .07.0.2i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07-0.07.
Area Twelve .07.0.2%.0%0.27..07-0.27.
Area Thirteen 0.3%1.1%0.37.1.17.0.37-0.97.
Area Fourteen 0.17.0.57.0.1%0.57..07.0.47.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .0%0.27..0%0.2%.0%0.2%
Anchor~ge/Chu9ach Mtn.Area .0%0.4i..07.0.47-.07.0.47.
Kenai Peniflsula 0.57.1.37.0.37.~.l%O.lia 0.57.
Copper R./Wr~ngell/V~ldez 0.57.1.37.0.47.1.27.0.37.0.97.
Southeast Alask~.Oi.0.2i.0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07.
Elsewhere in Alask~3.57-5.3%2.87.4.4%1.67.3.07.
Outside Alaska .0%0.2%0.0%0.0%0.07.0.0%
B-50
Table B.38.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
J
[
lI
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Alaska
In Alaska
Susitna Study Area
Area One
Area Two
Area Three
Are-:!Four
Area Five
Area Six
Area Seven
Are-:!Ei9ht
ilr~Jline_
Area Ten
Area Eleven
Area Twelve
Area Thirteen
Area Fourteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorase/Chusach Mtn.Area
Kenai Peninsula
.Copper··R;iWr.1fi~lell/V.ndei··
------------------:Southeast-Ataska
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
EVER
LOW HIGH
1190 1560
1210 1570
470 720
40 130
60 170
40 130
o 30
30 110
o 50
o 0
o 50
o 30
o 0
o 30
50 150
10 70
o 30
o 50
70 .....J~Q .
70 180
o 30
490 740
o 30
B-5l
1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
1010 1350 650 930
1020 1360 680 960
440 670 290 490
40 130 20 90
50 150 10 70
40 130 30 110
o 30 0 0
30 110 0 50
o ~0 ~
o 0 0 0o500
o 30 0 30
o 0 0 0
o 0 0 0
o ~0 W
50 150 40 130
10 70 0 50
o WOW
o ~0 ~
..._..50 150-------10-----·70-
60 12.0 40·--lJO-----
o 0 0 0
390 610 230 410
o 0 0 0
\\
I
iJ
,I
....j
-".
Table B.39.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
B-52
Table B.40.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Brown Bear Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska240350220320120200InAlaska240350220320120210SusitnaStudyArea14023012020070140AreaOne().30 0 30 0 20~r.e.3 Two 10 50 10 40 0 30AreaThree10501040030AreaFour030020020AreaFive030030010AreaSix010010010AreaSeven020020010Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Ten 0 0 0 0 0 ,0AreaEleven020020020Are'.!Twelve 0 20 0 20 0 20AreaThirteen10401040020AreaFOIJrteen0200200010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy10401040020Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0 20 0 20 0 20KenaiPeninsula030_0_____.30-._•..".__."~_.-"_._"_..~-,0,,--20-"'----0'--"_.._."-,._"."_...._-,----_..•_._..-"--~------,--._-,..'.'-----"..-_'._--_.---_.-..,-..-..--Cop per-R;/Wf3-figeU/V:aldez---30 0 30 0 30Southeast-Alaska 0 20 0 10 0 10ElsewhereinAlask'.!70 140 70 130 20 70OutsideAlaska0100000
B-53
JJ
J
1
J
i
1
'j;,1
:'/
')
I r
J
r
1
,.)
(
1
J
Table B.4L
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Black Bear Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~ska 11.8%13.6%10.0%11.8%7.2%8.67-
In Alaska 11.8%13.6%10.0%11.8%7.2%8.8%
Susitna Study Area 4.8%6.0%4.4%5.67-3.27-4.2%
Area One 0.3%0.7%0.27-0.67-0.17-0.5%
Area Two 0.9i.1.5%0.9i.1.57-0.67-1.0i.
Area Three 0.6%1.0%0.5i.0.9%0.3%0.7%
I I Area four 0.17.0.3%0.17.0.3%0.1i.0.3i.I I
I I Area five .0%0.2%.•0%0.2%.0%o ,..,.,
.~Ia
Area Six 0.17.0.5%0.17-0.5%0.1%0.37-
Area Seven 0.1%0.3%0.1%0.3%O.D:0.3%
Are·:!Ei9ht 0.0%0.0i.0.0i.0.0%0.0%0.0i.
Area Nine .07-0.2%.0%0.2%.Oi.0.27-
Area Ten 0.0%0.0%0.0i.0.0i.0.0%0.07.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.0i-0.0%0.0%0.0%
Area Twelve 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0i.0.07-
Area Thirteen 1.2%1.8%1.2%1.8%0.8%1.4%
Area Fourteen O.D.:0.3%0.17.0.37-.0%0.2i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.1%0.3%0.1%0.3%.0%0.2%
AnchoragelChu9ach Mtn.Area 0.4%0.8%0.2i.0.6%0.1%0.5%
Kenai Peninsula 1.6%2.4%1.3%1.9%0.8i:1.47.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez .0.57.0.9%0.2%0.6%0.2i.0.6i.
Southeast Alaska 0.2%0.67.0.17.0.5%.Oi.0.2%
Elsewhere in Alaska 4.0%5.2%3.6%4.67-2.67.3.67.
Outside Alaska 0.1%0.3%.0%0.2%0.07.0.07.
B-S4
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.42.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,.Number of ,
All Households Black Bear Hunt1ng'by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984~H~~H~~H~
In or out of Al.ask:~14460 16720 12320 14440 8780 10610
In Alaska 14460 16720 12320 14440 8900 10740
SIJsitna Study Area 5860 7400 5400 6880 3900 5180
Area One 370 850 280 710 180 550
Area Two 1100 1840 1100 1840 680 1280
Area Three 6S0 1280 'S80 1140 370 1350
Area Four 90 400 ,90 400 90 400
Area Five 20 230 20 230 20 230
Area Si:<180 550 180 550 90 400
AI'ea Seven 90 400 ,90 400 90 400
Area Ei9ht 0 0 .,0 0 0 0
Area Nine___20 .230--20 230---20'--230 -
'-Area Ten-0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twe 1ve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 1430 2250 1430 2250 1000 1700
Area Fourteen 90 400 90 400 20 230
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 90 400 90 400 20 230
Anchorage/Chu9ach Iitn.Area 470 1000 '280 710 180 550
Kenai Peninsula 1980 2930J~~Q.__~.3.2L_.__.__I000 1700_,.,.
...Copper.R./Wl'an gell1Valdez 5801140"280 710 280 no,_------~S':'_'ou.theast_Alaska---------:280··--n-0----r80 550 20 230
Elsewhere in Al:aska 4930 6360 4360 5710 3220 4390
Outside Alaska 90 400 20 230 0 0
B-55
)
,I
)
)
,I
/
1
II
i
j
I
I
}
Table B.43.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Black Bear Hunting by Area
I I
,
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCAIION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 10.5%13.3%8.8%11.47-6.27-8.4i.
In Alaska 10.4%13.27.8.8%11.4%6.3%8.5%
Susitna Study Area 3.9%5.n 3.5%5.3%2.57-4.1i.
Area One 0.1%0.7%0.1%0.5%0.17-0.5%
Area Iwo 0.6%1.4r.0.6%1.4i.0.3r.1.17.
Area Ihree 0.3%0.9%0.27-0.87-0.1%0.5%
Area Four .07.0.4%.07.0.47..Oi.0.4i.
Area Five .Oi.0.27..Oi.0.2%.0%O.2~~
Are::!Six 0.1%0.5r.0.17-0.57..Oi.0.47-
Area Seven .0%0.2%.07.0.2%.07.0.2%
Area Eight 0.0r.0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.0r.0.0r.
Area Nine .0%0.2%.0%0.27.0.0%0.07.
Area Ien 0.0%0.0%0.0r.0.0%0.0i.0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0r.0.0r.
Area Twelve 0.07.0.0%0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.0i.
Area Thirteen 1.0i.2.0%1.0%2.0i.0.77-1.57.
Area Fourteen •Or.0.4%•Or.0.2i.•Or.0.27.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy •Or.0.4%.0%0.47..07-0.2i.
Anchorage/Chugach.Mtn.Area 0.3i.0.97.0.1%o.n 0.1i.0.5r.
Kenai Peninsula 1.6%2.8r.1.2r.2.2r.o.n 1.7i.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.2%0.8%.0%0.4%•Or.0.47.
Southeast Alaska 0.1%0.7%0.1%0.57-•Or.0.27-
Elsewhere in Alaska 3.5%5.3i.3.1%4.n 2.3%3.7i.
Outside Ahska .0%0.4%.0%0.27.0.0%0.0%
B-56
Table B.44.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,~umber of
Urban Households Black Bear Hunt1ng by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska111801410093701208065808920InAlaska110801399093701208066BO9040SusitnaStudyArea414060603750560027004310AreaOne1407107056070560'.Area T~o 610 1510 610 1510 370 1120AreaThree29098021085070560Are-:!EOIJr 10 410 10 410 10 410'.Area Five 0 250 0 250 0 250AreaSix705607056010410AreaSeven025002500250AreaEight00000
0 0AreaTen000000AreaEleven000000AreaTwelve000000.Area Thirteen 1050 2140 1050 2140 700 1640AreaFourteen104100250025010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy10410104100250Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area 290 980 140 710 70 560KenaiPeninsula1680.19.0L .....~..122L ..2390-~····_···'lao-··-·-1760···......Gopper··R;/Wr:angelllVaHlez .·····:nO~-850 10 no 10 --410Southeast-~}aska ll0 710 70 560 0 250ElsewhereinAl:aska 3750 5600 3270 5010 2420 3950OutsideAlaska10410025000
B-57
1
.J
,}
)
J
I
!
1
!
J
i
:I
!
I
J
Table B.45.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Black Bear Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~15.2%18.4%13.3%16.5%9.9%12.nInAlaska15.3%18.5%13.5%16.7%10.1%12.97-
Susitna Study Area 7.4%9.8%6.8%9.2i.5.1i.7.3%Area One 0.3%1.Ii.0.3%1.1%0.3%0.97.Area Two 1.1%2.3i.1.0%2.2%0.8r.1.8i.
Area Three 1.2%2.4i.1.0%2.0i.0.1:'1.7i.Area tOIJr .Oi.0.2i..0%0.2%.Oi.0.2i.Area Five 0.2i.0.8%0.27.0.3%0.1%0.7i.
Area Six 0.2i.0.8i.0.2i.0.8i.0.17-0.5%
Area Seven 0.1%0.5%0.17.0.5i.0.17.o r:"j•..J",
Area Eight 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0r.
Area Nine .0%0.4i..Oi.0.47..0%0.4i.
Area Ten .Oi.0.2%0~0i.0.0i.0.0r.0.0i.
Area Eleven .Oi.0.2i..07.0.2i.0.0%0.07.
Area Twelve 0.0i.0.0i.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.07-
Area Thirteen 1.17-2.3%1.0%2.2%O.G%1.6%Area FOIJrteen 0.3i.0.9i.0.3%0.9i.O.li.o.n
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .07.0.47.•Or.0.4%.Or.0.27-
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.2%0.3%0.27.0.8%0.17-0.57-
Kenai Peninsula 0.7%1.7%0.6%1.47.0.3%0.9%
Copper R./Wr~ngell/Valdez 1.37.2.5i.1.li.2.3%1.0i.2.2%
Southeast Alaska .0%0.4%.Oi.0.27-.0%0.27-
Elsewhere in Alaska 4.8%6.87-4.1i.G.li.:3.0%4.61.
Outside Alaska 0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07.0.0r.0.07.
B-58
Table B.46.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Black Bear Hunting by Area
.,
.i
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska2100256018502280InAlaska2120257018802310SusitnaStudyArea102013609401280AreaOneSO150SO150AreaTwo160310150300AreaIhree170330130280Are.3 Four 0 30 0 30AreaFive3011030110AreaSix3011030110AreaSeven10701070AreaEight0000AreaNine0SO050Are.3 Ien 0 .~....--Area'Eleven 0 30 0 30AreaTwelve0000AreaThirteen160310ISO300AreaFOIJrteen401304013010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy050050Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area 30 110 30 110KenaiPeninsul.a 100 230 80 200CopperR./Wrangell/Valdez 180 350 160 310
•...-.--._......--...-.._".__._---_._-"~...,~_._-_..,.-...~---.---SoutheastAIaska .._-_..-....~---.-._-"_._.····~--··-··o··-·-·"SO--------0--··3(f .
El~~Mhe~e_in_Alaska 660--950 570--840OutsideAlaska0000
B-59
)
l
I
1984
LOW HIGH
I J13801760
1400 1790
710 1010
J
40 130
110 250
100 230
0 30 I2090
10 70
10 70
0 0
0 50
0 0 i00
90 220
20 90 )0 30
10 70
40 130 l150300_.'-.__._-----_._----"~-----~--_._..-..-.
0 30no640
1
0 0
J
!
1
J
!
J
Table B.47.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Black Bear Hunting by Area
i(
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 22.0%27.6%18.2r.23.6r.10.6%15.07.
In Alaska 21.7%27.3%18.0r.23.4%10.n 15.1i.
Susitna Study Area 13.47-18.2%11.47-16.07-7.3r.11.1%
Area One 0.8%2.4%0.87.2.4%0.3%1.7%
Are.:!Two 3.7%6.5i.3.47.6.2%1.7%3.97.
Area Three 2.67.5.27.2.2%4.67.1.n 3.97-
Area Eour 0.0%0.7%0.0r.O.7k 0.0r.0.77.
Area Five 0.2%1.27.0.1i.1.17-0.0r.0.5i.
Area Six 0.1%1.D.:.0%0.8i.0.07.0.77-
Area Seven 0.0r.0.5i.0.0i.0.57-O.Or.0.57-
Area Eight 0.0%0.0%0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.
Area Nine 0.0%0.0%0.0i.0.0%0.0%0.0r.
Area Ten 0.0i.0.0i.0.0r.0.0r.0.07.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.3%0.07-0.37-O.O:!0.3%
Area Twelve 0.0r.0.3%0.0r.0.37.0.07.0.37.
Area Thirteen 1.6%3.8%0.97.2.7%0.4i.1.8i.
Are.:!Fourteen .0%0.87.0.07.0.77.0.0r.0.3%
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 0.0%0.5%0.07.0.5?0.07-0.57-
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.5%1.97.0.47-1.8%0.1%LIZ
Kenai PeninslJla 0.4%1.8%0.37.1.7%0.2r.1.27-
Copper i./Wrangell/Va1dez 0.9%2.7%0.8%2.4%0.3%1.77.
Southeast Alaska .0%0.8i.0.0%0.37.0.0%0.0r.
Elsewhere in Alaska 4.6%7.87.4.37.7.3%1.9%4.11.
Outside Alaska .Oi.0.8%0.07.0.7%0.0%0.0%
B-60
Table B.48.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of .
Rural Households Black Bear Hunting by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska580740480630280400InAlaska580730480620280400SusitnaStudyArea360480300420190300AreaOne206020601040AreaTwo1001709017050100AreaThree70140GO12050100AreaFour020020020AreaFive030030010AreaSb:0 30 0 20 0 20AreaSeven010010010AreaEi9ht000000AreaNine00000(}Area Ten 0 0--_._---_._._..._..~-_.......Ar'eaEleven-··0 0 10 0 10AreaTwelve010010010AreaThirteen4010020701050AreaFourteen02002001010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy010010010Anchorage/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 10 50 10 50 0 30KenaiPeninsula10501040030CopperR./Wrange11/Valdez 20 70 20 60 10 40.....SoutheastAlaska 0 20 .-···0····.....·10-···········_·······--··0····0······
Elsewh~~e-in_Alaska 120--210 1-10--200 5o--ltOOutsideAlaska02002000
l.1
I
)
l
(
J
i
I
I
,}
Table B.49.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Small Game Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 37.9%40.n 33.8%36.4%27.6%30.2i.
In Alaska 36.1%38.7%32.87.35.47.27.4%30.0%
Susitna Study Area 19.3%21.57.18.0%20.27.14.87.16.8i.
Area One 0.7%1.3%0.7%1.3%0.6%1.2%
Area Two 3.9%5.1%3.8%5.0%3.2%4.2%
Area Three 4.4%5.6%.3.8%5.0%3.07-4.07.
Area four 0.1%0.5%O.n:0.5%o.n 0.3%
Area five 0.57-0.9%0.5%0.97.0.5%0.97-
Are:~Six 1.2%1.8%1.07.1.6%0.8%1.47-
Area Seven 0.5%0.9%0.47.0.87.0.37.0.7%
Area Eight .0%0.2%.0%0.2%0.0%0.0i.
Area Nine 0.5%0.9%0.5%0.9%0.37-0.77.
Are:~Ten .0%0.2%•Or.0.2%•Or.0.2i.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07.
Area Twelve .0%0.2%.0%0.2%.0%0.2i.
Area Thirteen 1.8%2.6%1.7%2.5%1.4%2.2%
Area fourteen 2.4%3.4%2133%3.3i.2.07-2.87.
10 Miles North at Denali Hwy 0.3%0.7%0.3%0.7%0.27.0.6%
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 2.57.3.57.2.3%3.1%l.87.2.6?
Kenai Peninsula 6.6%8.0%6.2%7.6%5.37.6.7%
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez o.n 1.3%0.67.1.2%0.5%0.9%
Southeast Alaska 0.57.0.9%0.4%0.8%0.2%0.6%
Elsewhere in Alaska lO.n 12.5:>':9.5%11.1%7.8%9.4%
Outside Alaska 1.6%2.4%0.77.1.3%0.2::::0.6i.
B-62
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.50.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Small Game Hunting by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 46580 49900 41460 44710
In Alaska 44270 47550 40250 43470
Susitna ~tudy Area 23670 26410 22110 24780
Area One 890 1570 890 1570
Area Two 4820 6230 4700 6100
Area Three 5400 6880 4700 6100
Area four 180 550 180 550
Area five 580 1140 580 1140
Area Six 1430 2250 1210 1980
Area Seven 580 1140 470 1000
Area Ei9ht 20 230 20 230
Area Nine 580 1140 580 1140
-Area Ten 20 230 20 230
Area Eleven __~__{i...._.._O__..~_..0---..--0-.-----
Area Twelve 20 230 20 230
Area Thirteen 2200 3200 2090 3060
Are.';l fourteen 2990 4130 2880 4000
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 370 850 370 850
Anchorage/Chu9ach litn.Area 3100 4260 2760 3860
Kenai Peninsula 8080 9840 7610 9330
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 890 1570 780 1430
Southeast Alaska 580 1140 470 1000
--Elsewhere-in Alaska ·-13150 -15330-·------U610--·13680
---------'Outside-Alaskal-------1980--2930 890--1570
B-63
1984
LOW HIGH
33940 37020
33690 36770
18160 20630
780 1430
3900 5180
3670 4920
90 400
580 1140
1000 1700
.-370 850
o 0
370 850
20 230
-.----0-----0
20 230
1760 2660
2430 3470
280 710
2200 3200
6560 8170
580 1140
280 710
·-·---'-·----~·-96-00 ·'---ffslo···--------·-'----
2@---n..o:-------
I }
)
I
\1
I
I
I I
i
I
1
!
j
!
;1
r
I
)
Table B.51.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Small Game Hunting by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 36.D:40.3%31.8i.35.87-25.67.29.47.
In Alaska 34.17-38.1i.30.67.34.6i.25.3%29.1%
Susitna Study Area 17.07.20.2i.15.8?19.07.12.77.15.7i.
Area One 0.57.1.3i.0.57.1.37.0.4i.1.27.
Area Two 3.D.:4.77-3.07-4.6i.2.4i.3.8~
Area Three 3.57.5.3%3.0%4.6%2.2%3.6%
Area tOIJr 0.1%0.5i..07-0.47.0"0.4i.I I •h
Area Five 0.3%0.97.0.37.0.9i.0.27.0.87.I I Are.:!Six 1.07.2.07-0.8%1.8i.0.6%1.4i.
Area Seven 0.37.0.97..0.27-0.8i.0.2%0.81.
Area Ei9llt 0.0%0.0%.0.07-0.01.0.0%0.07.
Area Nine 0.3?1.17..0.37.1.1i.0.2%0.8r.
Area Ten .Oi.0.2%.•O?0.2i..Oi.0.2%
Area Eleven 0.0%0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0%
Area Twelve 0.07.0.07.0.0%0.0i.0.07.0.0%
Area Thirteen 1.6%2.8%1.57.2.7%1.2%2.4%
Area FOIJrteen 2.17-3.57.2.0%3.47.1.7%2.91.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.37.0.9%0.27.0.87.0.11.0.71.
AnchoNge/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 2.5";3.97.2.37.3.7%1.8%3.07.
Kenai Peninsula 6.97.9.37.6.5%8.7:(5.6i.7.87-
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.2%0.87.0.1%0.77-0.1%0.77.
Southeast Alaska 0.37.1.12:0.31.0.97.0.2i.0.8%
Elsewhere in Alaska 10.17.12.97.B.87.11.47.7.3%9.77.
Outside Alaska 1.67.2.8%0.77-1.n:0.2i.0.8%
B-64
B-65
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Table B.52.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Small Game Hunting by Area
,)
)
I
~
I
!
j
I
,~
I
l
I
J
I
)
1[
I
I
.1
1984
LOW HIGH
27200 31220
26890 30890
13510 16650
450 1250
2510 4070
2320 3840
10 410
210 850
610 1510
:210 850
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
33770 38030
32520 36740
16770 20190
530 1380
3180 4900
3180 4900
10 410
290 980
870 1890
210 8~dj
EVER
LOW HIGH
38390 42760
36180 40510
18000 21510
530 1380
3270 5010
3750 5600
70 560
290 980
)050 2140
290 980
':1 0
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
(;,'e.,Six
In or out of A1ask~
In Alaska
Susitna StUdy Area
Area One
Are.:!Two
Area Three
Are~Four
Area Five
Ai'2-3 Seven
:~::.~~Pijht
Ar8.3 Mine 370 1120 370 1120 210 850
-Ar-e~-Tenc-----....'--0 .250--0-250--.'-0---250
Are~Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.:!Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 1680 3000 1580 2880 1310 2510Are~Fourteen 2230 3720 2140 3600 1770 3120
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 290 980 :no 850 140 710
Anchor~ge/Chu9ach Iitn.Area 2610 4190 2420 3950 1860 3240
hMi~~h ~~~~~~
Copper R./Wr~nge11/Va1I:1ez.__.__glQ_~850 ..'..,....140_....710-......140.--710'"
..--.--..--.--·--Sou·£neast Alaska'.,,----370 1120 290 9.8.0'---------210-----------850-----
------£1sewl1ere mA1asK-~-----;1..0~78~0---;;1~36~5::-0-----:9=3~70:------=-=-12080 7770 10280
Outside Ahska 1680 3000 780 1760 210 850
Table B.53.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Small Game Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 40.5i.44.9i.38.67.43.07-33.47-37.61.
In Alaska 40.2%44.6%38.5%42.97-33.8%38.07-
Susitna Study Area 26.8i.30.87.25.87.29.87.22.07-25.8i.
Area One 0.67.1.67.0.6%1.67.0.67-1.47-
Area Two 6.5%8.9%6.3i.8.7%5.37.7.57-
Area Three 7.0%9.47.6.6%9.07-5.97.8.1;~
II Area fOIJr 0.2%0.87.O.li:0.77.O.li.0.57.
Area Five 1.0%2.27-1.07.2.07.0.87-1.8i.
Area Six 1.li:2.37-1.Ii.2.37-0.87-1.8i.
Area Seven 0.6i.1.47.0.6i.1.47-0.47-1.27.
Area Ei9ht .Oi.0.2i..07-O.2k .07-0.27.
Area Nine 0.2%0.87.0.27.0.87.0.17.0.5%
Area Ten .Oi.0.27..07.0.27-0.0i.0.07-
Area Eleven .0%0.27..07.0.27..07.0.27-
Area Twelve .07-0.47-.Oi.0.4i..07.0.47-
Area Thirteen 1.37.2.57.1.3%2.57.1.0r.2.2%
Area fourteen 3.07.4.67-2.87-4.47-2.37.3.7'-:
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .0%0.4%.07.0.47..07-0.47.
Anchorage/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 0.87.1.87.0.87-1.8i.0.67.1.67.
Kenai Peninsula 1.87.3.27.1.77.3.17.1.6i.2.8i.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 3.0i.4.6i.2.9%4.5i.2.4%4.0%
Southeast Alaska 0.17.0.57.0.17.0.57..07.0.47.
Elsewhere in Alaska 9.47.12.2%8.8%11.4%7.67.10.27.
OIJtside Alaska 0.17.0.77.•Or.0.47.0.07.0.07.
[I
lJ
\J
B-66
Table B.54.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Small Game Hunting by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 5620 6230 5360 5960
In Alaska 5580 6190 5350 5950
Susitna Study Area 3720 4270 3590 4130
Area One 90 220 90 220
Area Two 910 1230 880 1200
Area Three 970 1310 920 1250
Area tOIJf 30 110 20 90
Area Five 150 300 130 280
Area Six 160 310 160 310
Area Seven 80 200 BO 200
Area Ei9ht 0 30 0 30
AJ'ea Nine 30 110 30 110
Area Ten 0 30 0 30
-.--.--.-AreaEleven-~0 ~
Area Twelve 0 50 0 50
Area Thirteen 180 350 180 350AreaFourteen410640390610
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0 50 0 50
Anchorage/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 110 250 110 250
Kenai Peninsula 250 440 240 430
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 410 640 400 630
-Southeast-Al.:Iska------_.__._-.····----10----.--70-.-····-----10---...··-70
El sJ!whar..e_i_CLAlaska 1310__169.0 1220--1590
Outside Alaska 20 90 0 50
B-67
)
!
I
\\
I
1984 1
LOW HIGH
4640 5220 ..j46905270
3060 3580
SO 200
)740 1040
B20 1130
10 70
I110250
110 250
GO 170
0 30 I1070
0 30
1050
150 300
310 520
I050
90 220
220 390
340 550
J---0 -----50
1060--1410
0 0
I t
I
I
I
.I
)
Table B.SS.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Small Game Hunting by Area
I
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
]GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
r I
In or out of Alaska 60.8i.G7.2k 5G.2k 62.67.47.6%54.2j~
In Alaska 60.1%66.57-56.01.62.47.4'1 '1'/54.31.I •J ,.
Susitna Study Area 43.5%50.1%40.lk 46.7i.34.4%40.81.
Area One 2.97.5.57.2.11.4.5:t 1.6i.3.87.
II Are::!'Cwo 11.7i.16.37-11.4i.16.01.9.97.14.lI.
I J Area Three 7.57-11.3%6.97.10.77.5.3k 8.7;~
Area Four 0.07-0.57-0.07-O.5i.0.01.O.5~
II Area five 2.0i.4.4i.1.8i.4.0i.1.67.3.87-
Are."Sb:1.77.3.97.1.4i.3.47.1.li:2.97.
Area Seven 0.7%2.37.0.77-2.37.0.6r.2.0i.
lJ
Are.:!Eight 0.07-0.37.0.0i.0.37-0.0r.0.37-
Are.,.Nine 0.37-1.5r.0.37.1.5%o ")'/1.27.aNI.
Area Ten 0.07.0.0r.0.0i-0.0r.0.0i-o.oi
Area Eleven 0.0r.0.5!.0.07-0.57.0.07-0.37.
Area Twelve .07.0.8i-.0%O.8k .Oi-0.87-
Are·:!Thirteen 3.n 6.7i.3.3:t:6.n 3.37.6.17-
Area Fourteen 2.7%5.3i.2.57-5.17.2.0i.4.2i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.37-1.7%0.37-1.57-0.27-1.4i.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1.Ii.2.9i.0.6i.2.27-0.6i.2.2k
Kenai Peninsula 0.9i.2.7%0.87-2.6%0.6i.2.07-
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 2.2i.4.67-2.0i.4.4i.1.8i.4.0i.
Southeast Alaska 0.0i.0.37-0.0i.0.3i.0.0i.O.Oia
Elsewhere in Alaska 15.07-20.07-14.17-18.9i-11.87-16.4i.
Outside Alaska 0.27-1.4%.0%1.0%0.07.0.5/.
, IlJ
IJ
B-68
B-69
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
Table B.56.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Small Game Hunting by Area
I
i )
1
I j
I
I
j
I )
,.~
I
1
I
1
f I
I
-j
I I
/
)
1984
LOW HIGH
1270 1440
1270 1440
920 1090
40 100
260 380
140 230
o 10
40 100
30 80
10 50
o 10
o 30
HIGH
1670
1660
1240
120
420
280
10
110
90
60
10
40
1980 -1985
LOW
1490
1490
1070
60
300
180
o
50
40
20o
10
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER
LOW HIGH
In or OfJt of Ahsk~1620 1790
In Al~sk~1600 1770
SIJsi tn~St'Jdy Are~1160 1330
Area One SO 150
Area Two 310 430
Area Three 200 300
Are.3 FOIJr 0 10
Area Five 50 120
Are~Six 50 100
Area Seven 20 60
Are~Eight 0 10
Are.3 Nine 10 40
Are~Ten 0 ..
......AreaE1even-0 10 0 10 0 10
Are~Twelve 0 20 0 20 0 20
Area Thirteen 100 laO 90 160 90 160Are~Fourteen 70 140 70 130 50 no
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 10 40 10 40 10 40
Anchor.3ge/Ch 'Jgach Mtn.Are~30 so 20 60 20 60
Kenai Peninsula 20 70 20 70 10 50
Copper R./Wrange11fV.31dez 60 120 50 120 ...__._.50 __..JHL._..
··-···--....·-·-···..--Southeast-Alask.3-·-··----···---·-·-0----······'10 -.-.-.-._..O·..·..·-To···0 0
------E1sewher-e-in-Alask~400--530 370--50·0 310 440
Outside Alaska 10 40 0 30 0 10
i I
1
11
i 1
I
I 1
I
()
[I
IJ
Table B.57.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~82.2i.84.2i.79.8i.82.0X 70.5i.72.9i.
In Alask.3 8l.6i.83.6%79.3%31.5%70.4i.72.8%
Susitn~Study Area 44.87.47.6i.43.0i.45.87-37.3i.39.9;'
Area One 1.9i.2.7%l.aj~2.6i.i.n -,r:a,
w.,J/.
Area Two 12.8;'14.8i.12.5i.14.3%10.8i.12.67.
Area Three 3.87,;5.0i~3.6i.4.6i.'1 1.)'(3.9i..w."J.
Area fOIJr 0.3i.o.n 0.3i.0.71.0.3i.O.7Z
Area Five 2.n 3.77.2.67.3.67.2.37.3.17.
Are.3 Si:-:2.U 2.,97-1.9i.2.77.1.47.2.21.
Are~Seven 0.97.1.5%0.97.1.57.0.6;'1 ')'f......1.
Area Eight 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.O.O;~
Area Nine 0.97.1.5i.0.9i.1.5i-0.87.1.47-
Area Ten o.n O.3i.0.1i.0.37..Oi.0.27.
Area Eleven .O~{0.2%.Oi.0.27..0%0.2i.
Are.3 Twelve 0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.01.
Area Thirteen 11.Ii.12.9~10.n 12.57-9 r:'f 11.17.•...1,.
Are.3 fourteen 3.5i.4.5i.,.,')u 4.3i.2.8i~3.BZ\law!.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.67-1.27.0.6:l;1.0%0.5%0.97.
Anchor .3'je/Ch IJ'jach Mtn.Ar ea 2.47.3.47.2.47-3.41.2.1i.2.91.
Kenai Peninsula 32.8%35.47.32.0i.34.67.28.37-30.9i.
Copper R./Wran'jell/Valdez 3.2i.4.2i.3.1i.4.14 2.8i.3.87.
Southeast Alaska 2.2%3.07-2.0i.2.37-1.7%l")r:1 /...,.J/.
Elsewhere in Alaska 14.97.16.97.14.6i.IG.67.12.9i.14.9i.
OIJtside Alaska 1.Gi.2.47.1.37.1.9:1:0.6;'1.2i.
B-70
Table B.S8.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Fishing by Area
I
j
J
,"1
j
1
I
!
I I
)
,I
1 I
I
r
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
97970 100640 36480 89540
97340 100040 86360 89420
52810 56190 45730 49040
2200 3200 2090 3060
15290 17610 13270 15450
4360 5710 3560 4'790
370 850 370 850
3220 4390 2760 3860
2310 3330 1760 2660noo18407801430
0 0 0 0noo184010001700
90 400 '"it;23C'w\{
20 230
HIGH
103400
102680
58410
3330
18110
6100
850
4530
3600
1840
o
1840
400
230
B-7l
EVER
LOW
100860
100110
55020
2310
15770
4700
370
3330
2540
1100
o
1100
90
20
'0
13630 15830 13150 15330 11610 13680
4240 5580 4020 5310 3440 4660
730 1430 680 1280 580 1140
2990 4130 2990 4130 2540 3600
40250 43470 39280 42480 34780 37890
3900 5180 3790 5050 3440 4660
2650 3730 2430 3470 2090 3060
.18280.....20760--.--..····1·7·920----20380····..···15890·--·18240 ..····
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or Oijt of Al~sk~
In A1ask.,
Sijsitn~Stijdy Area
Area One
Are::!'lwo
Area Three
Are.,FOIJr
Area Five
Are.,Sh:
Are.3 Seven
Are.'3 Eight
Are.,Nine
Area Ten
Area Eleven
"'Area'!welve"~.
Area Thirteen
Are.,FOIJrteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chij9ach Mtn.Area
I{enai Peninsij!a
Copper R./Wrangel1/Valdez
Southeast Alaska
............................JI~~!'IJl~r.§jD.J'l'3ska__.._...
Outside
Table B.59.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Fishing by Area
[]
EVER
LOW HIGH
81.3Z 84.51.
80.6i::33.81.
42.81.47.07.
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
1984
LOW HIGH'
69.17.n.9i.
68.91.72.77.
3.9i.
2.8X
1.57.
1.21.
1.2;~
3.47.
0.07.
0.8%
3.47.
0.01.
11.61.
12.37.
15.61.
1.3i.
34.3;~
2.91.
2.9k
39.27.
l.1i.
.Oi.
.01.
2.0k
2.3%
2.5X
1.67.
0.47.
0.07.
9.01.
0.21.
0.41.
0.07.
0.71.
'lC'-'"\'l\oJ·J.ili.
1.7i.
12.67-
0.5%
30.3;:
l.n
o.n
3.87.
2.87.
H.rk
4.57.
2.4%
2.7k
82.n
1.5i.
0.07-
1.81.
0.47-
0.27-
0.01.
13.0:1:
4.41.
3.3i.
17.31.
1.37-
3.Si.
38.47.
81.61.
45.1i.
2.47.
O.3k
2.4k
1.5i.
0.71.
0.07.
0.87.
.07.
2.8i.
0.5A:
.01.
34.47-
1.87.
1.91.
14.31.
1.2i.
0.0i.
10.27.
40.97.
1.6i.
11.37.
2.97.
78.7/.
78.21.
2.9i.
14.5i.
4.77-
0.91.
3.91.
2.97.
1.71.
0.01.
1.8%
0.41.
0.21.
0.07.
13.51.
4.61.
1.37.
3.91.
39.27.
3.31.
3.6A:
17.7%
2.87.
.O~.
.Ok
1',''7'/all.
0.77-
0.01.
O.~81.
1.7i.
11.7/.
3.1%
0.3%
20'5%
2.27.
14.57.
1.67.
0.01.
10.71.
3.01.
0.5%
2.5%
35.2%
1.97.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alask::!
SIJsitn.:!Study Are.:!
Area One
Area Two
Area Three
Area Four
Are.:!Five
Area Si;(
Area Seven
Are.3 Eight
Area Nine
Area Ten
Area Eleven
Area Twelve
Area Thirteen
Are.:!FOlJrteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area
Kenai PeninslJla
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez
Southeast Alaska
Elsewhere in Alaska
OlJtside AlaskaiILJ
II
i I
I
(I
(j
[j
(].
I)
(J
IJ
B-72
Table B.60.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska863608975083610871S07337077460InAlaska85590890308306086670.73150 77250SusitnaStudyArea454504993043440479003734041690AreaOne177031201680300016803000Are.'a Two 12400 15430 11990 14990 10270 13090AreaThree327050103030473024203950Are.3 FOIJr 290 980 290 980 210 850AreaFive261041902510407021403600Are.3 Si>:1770 3120 1580 2880 1130 2260AreaSeven780176070016404501250Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0Are::!Nine 870 1890 870 1890 700 1640Are.3 Ten 10 410 10AreaEleven-----0 250--0 250 0 250Are.3 Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen11380143201088013760957012310AreaFOIJrteen31804900298046602610419010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy530138053013804501250Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 2610 4190 2510 4070 2140 3600KenaiPeninsula373404169036500408303220036410CopperR./Wrangel1/Valdez 2050 3480 1950 3360 1770 3120.i~J_tb~..:~st -.Ala.s_ka .-~_...._._._~-~--_._-_..----2320---3840-----...--2050------3480--·····--·---·--1770···3120-Elsewhere in Alaska 1_5.45_0_18160 151-40-18420 1-9410-165-40OutsideAlaska16803000131025105301380
B-73
'I
)
I
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
1
I
j
I j
, I
j
I
II
I J
Table B.6l.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1~ska 83.Gi.86.8i.82.61.85.8i.74.67.78.4i~
In Alaska 83.57.86.7i.82.57.85.77.74.77.73.,5%
Susitna Study Area 52.57.56.91.51.51.55.9%46.IZ C"1'l.r::"1
·JVtl.J'1
Area One 1.1i.2.3~~LIZ 2.37.1.0i.2.0:~
Area Two 16.57.19.97.16.11.19.51.14.71.17.91.
Are.;}Three 6.77.9.17.6.51.8.9i:C"""'/7.97.,J.i /a
Are.;}Four 0.2i.0.81.0.21.0.81.0.2%0.87.
Area Five ",1:1 '4.17.2.31.3.97-2.1~'1 r:-/u •.J/.w •..,},.
Area Si:<2.71.4.31.2.77-4.31.'l ")"3.97."';'a-.JI.
Area Seven 1.1i.2.37.1.17-l')'VI 0.9i.1 '1'/.1:..1J/..,,1.
Are~Eight .07.0.47..07-0.4i..07-O.4;~
Are<l Nine 0.51.1.37.0.57-1.3i.0.37-1.1i.
Area Ten .07.0.4i..07.0.47..OX 0.4i:
Area Eleven O.O;~0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07-
Area Twelve 0.07.0.07.0.07-0.07-0.01.0.07-
Area Thirteen 10.17-12.97-10.17.12.'~i.9.27.12.0i.
Are.;}Fourteen 3.87.5.67.3.77-5.5%:3.17-4.9i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.1%0.57-0.1i.O.5~~.OX 0.4i.
Anchorage/ChlJgach I1to.Area 0.87.1.87-0.87.1.87.0.67.1.6i.
Ken<li Peninsuh 13.47-16.6%13.17.16.3%11.67.14.67.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 9.31.12.17-9.37-12.17-8.9i.11.51.
Southeast Alaska 0.57.1.37-0.57.1.3i.0.3i.1.1i.
Elsewhere in Alask~13.37.16.51.13.31.16.57.12.07.15.01.
Outside Alask<l 0.27.0.8%0.27-0.8i.0.17.o 1:''''1•,,,JI.
B-74
Table B.62.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Fishing by Area
,l
I
1'.
2080
70
1670
10
2280
110
1850
30
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGH11610120401146011910103601088011590120301145011890103701039072907890715077606400701016031016031013028022902760224027002040_24909301260910123079011003011030110301103505703205402904903706003706003205401603101603101202700500500507018070
50 0 5000000000000014001790140017901280166052078051077044067010701070050.110 250 110 250 90 220186023001820226016102020-----1.30-0---.-.16'10-----------1300-----1670----------t230---1600--------·--
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alaska
Susitn~Study Are~
Area One
Are.3 Two
Area Three
Are:~Four
Area Five
Are.3 Sb(
Area Seven
Are~Eight
Area Nine
Outside Al.3Sk.3
Are~Eleven
Are.:!Twelve
Are.3 Thirteen
Are.3 FOIJrteen
10 Hiles Marth of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area
Kenai PeninslJla
Copper R.IWr ::lrtge ll/Valdez_
--.---------------SoutheastAlaska----
B-75
(
-,I
I
Table B.63.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 19BO -19B5 19B4
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1~sk:a 83.97-88.57-82.47-87.27-74.3i;7SI .9X
In Alaska 83.67-88.27-82.37-87.17-74.5k 80 .l~!
Susitn~Study Are~48.67.55.27.46.97.53.57-40.07-46.67.
Area One 1.7i.3.97-1.n 3.9~1.67.3.8:'
Are~Two 13.8i.18.6i.13.57.18.37.12.67-17.2X
Area Three 3.07-5.87-3.0i.5.6i.2.7~5.3i:
Area four 0.07-0.07-O.Oi:0.0i.0.0i.0.01.
Area five 2.3;(4.77-l')./'}.,4.61.2.lI.4.5;:",....1.
Area Si>:2.3i.4.n :211 :jX 4.77.1.:3r.~~
Are::!Seven 0.17.1,11.O.lr.1.1 ~!HI 1,()~~lit.
Are.~Ei9ht 0.0i.0.07.0.07.(I.(l'~:';/'1 •1~li~o.Qj~
Are::!Nine 1.27-3.21.0.6:'2.07-0.07.0.51.
Area Ten 0.07-0.37.0.07-Q.3i.0.0i.0.3%
Are::!Eleven 0.0r.0.0r.0.0r.0.07.0 ..07.0.0%
At'2::1 Twelve •Or.0.8r..Oi.0.8i..Oi.0.81.
Area Thirteen 9.51.13.77.9.4i.13.67.8.1r.12.1;~
Are::!four t'2en 4.47-7.67-4.3k 7.5;~oj 'jl;1:·,01..:".:'!J!l\
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.37-1.57-0.31.1.5i.0.37-1.57.
Anchor~ge/Chu9~ch Mtn.Are.~0.57-1.97-0.51.1.97.O.3k 1.77.
1
Kenai Peninsula 9.67-13.3r.9.1%13.37.8.07.12.07-
j Copper R./Wrange11/V~ldez 5.2r.8.67-5.1%8.31.5.0i.8.2%
Southeast Alaska 0.77.2.37-o.n 2.3%{1 r']~2.37-\la'18
Elsewhere in Al.3sk~10.51.14.91.10.57.14.91.7.87.11.87.
Outside Alaska 0.37-1.57-0.27.1.47-o.li.1.1%
B-76
I,I
Table B.64.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
,-'-\
\
1\
\.
\
"~J\
I'
\".-.
i r
I
1984
HIGH
,~2120
2130 (,
1240
I,.i100
460
140
0 -\
120
I 1\90
30
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
~H~~H~~
In or OlJt of Ahsk.3 2230 2350 2190 2320 1980
In Alaska 2220 2350 2190 2320 1980
SIJsitna Study Are.3 1290 1470 1250 1420 1060
Are.3 One 50 100 50 100 40~N~m ~~m ~
Are:3 Three 80 150 80 150 70
Are.3 tOlJr 0 0 0 0 0
Area five 60 130 60 120 60
Are.3 Si>:60 130 60 130 30
Area Seven 0 30 0 30 0
Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Nine 30 80 10 50 0 10
Area Ten 0 10 0 10
Area Eleven-~~--...--~-~-O----....0---0 0 0
Are:3 Twelve 0 20 0 20 0 20
Area Thirteen 250 360 250 360 220 320
Are.3 FOIJrteen 120 200 120 200 90 160
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 10 40 10 40 10 40
Anchorage/ChlJgach Mtn.Are.3 10 50 10 50 10 40
Kenai Peninsula 250 370 240 350 210 320
Copper R./WrangelllV.31dez 140 230 130 220 130 220
Southeast Alaska __~_..2o_____-60-.----·-·-20 ·-60------~-------20----'60'-·_·---··-----Ersewl1ereln·~A~fa~s:"'::k·:i"__--~28~0~-.::!]401..0~~---280------.400 210-~3tO-----
------OiItslaeJUasli..3 10 40 10 40 0 30
B-77
Table B.65.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Salmon Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Ahsk.3 67.0i.69.6i.65.2i~67.8i.1:..,.,C:"I 60.:3%oJi •.J/.
In A1ask.3 67.9%70.5%65.9i.68.5i~58.0i.60.8i.
Susitna Study Area 40.9i.43.77.39.4i.42.27-:33.8i.36.47.
!I Are::!One 1.3i.2.17.1.3%1.9i~1.2~'1.87.u Are.3 Two 13.0i.15.0i.12.71.14.51.10.61.12.47.I 1 Area Three 2.7X 3.n 2.6i.3.6k 2.1~-1 qa,
i.a •.:I.
l~re.'3 tOIJr 0.3i.0.77.0.3i.0.7i.o ')'J o '1'/,\JI.,i"
Area Five 1.77.'1 ,,'!1.6i.2.4k 1.47.l")-,"/oW II ...J/a oW aul.
Area Sh;l.SI.2.61.1.6i.2.41.1.2~1.8i.
Are.3 Seven 0.6i.1.2%0.6i.1.2;'0.6i.1.07.
Area Eight 0.0%0.01.0.01.0.01.0.01.O.O;~
Are.3 Nine 0.5?0.9i.0.5%O.9;!0.47.0.87.
Are.3 Ten 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.O.Oi.V.OX 0.01.....,Are.3 Eleven 0.0i.0.0r.0.0i.O.Oi:O.O;~0.0%I
i.l Area Twelve 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.07-0.07.0.01.
Area Thirteen 12.4i.14.2i.11.9%13.7Z 10.51.P ')'/oW ,,,,,i,
Area Fourteen 2.2%3.0i.2.27-3.0;~l.Sk 2.6%
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.4i.0.8i.0.47.0.87-0.47-0.8i.
Anchorage/Chu9::!ch Mtn.Are::!1.3k 2.17-1.3%1.97-1.11.1.77-
Kenai PeninslJ1a 31.7i.34.3~31.07.33.6%27.3;'29.Ij/~
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 3.3~~4.31.3.1k 4.li:2.77..:.'1'1
'.J.li,
Southeast Alaska 2.2%3.0i.1.9i.2.77-1.67.2.4i.
Elsewhere in Alaska 9.4i.n.Oi.9.0i.10.6i.7.57-9.17.
I Outside A1.3sk::!0.2%0.6%0.2%0.6%O.li.O.5X
I
B-78
Table B.66.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Househot'ds Salmon Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAl~sk~82260 85420 80030 133230 706:30 73970InAl.3sk.3 83380 86510 80900 84080 71250 74580Susitn~Study Are~50250 53600 48410 51750 41460 44710Are~One 1650 2530 1540 2390 1430 2250Are::!Two 16010 18360 15530 17860 13030 15200AreaThree·~330 4530 3220 4390 2540 3600Are.3 Pour ,370 850 370 850 370 850AreaFive209030601980293017602660Are.':!Si:<2200 3200 1980 2930 1430 2250AreaSeven780143078014306801280Are.':!Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0Area-----580 --1140--580 1140 470Are.':!Ten 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaEleven000000AreaTwelve000000AreaThirteen151701748014580168501291015070AreaFourteen26503730265037302200320010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy470100047010004701000Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area '1650 2530 1540 2390 1320 2120KenaiPeninsula3891042110_._J8_0_60 _____..A1240_._-------33570-----36640'--CopperRJWr:~rigellIV-31ijez -----4020 ---····-5310---3790 5050 3330---4530Southeast-Alaska 2050 3730 2310 3330 1980 2930ElsewhereinAlaska11490135501102013040925011130OIJtsideAlaska280710280710180550
B-79
\\ I
.\
\
"/
\
. I)\,I
c.
,j
I
·\
I
Table B.67.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Salmon Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLItS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 65.6i.69.6i.63.8i.67.8i.56.li.60.3;;
In Alaska 66.47-70.47-64.57-68.57-56.6%60.87.
Susitna Study Area 38.7'1.42.97.37.1i.41.3i.31.67.35.6;~
Area One 1.2%'1 '1 11[1.1'1.2.n 1.0i.2.0~,;,aula
Area Two n.n 14.5i.11.37.14.1i.9.3i.11.'3;;
Area Three 2.2'1.3.6'1.2.1,r'\C:"1.6'1.2.3Z,,J.~A.
Are::!Four 0.2'1.O.B7.0.2i.0.8i.O.2X 0.8i.
Are.:!five 1.5~2.n 1.4~~'"l '"1.2i.2.4%...01.
Are.:!Six 1.4i.2.6i.1 '1'/2.4i:0.97.1.91..~/.
Area Seven 0.47-1.2X 0.47-1.2i.0.3:'1.1;(
Are.:!Eight 0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.07.
Area Nine 0.37-I.lk 0.3'1.LIZ 0.3%l.n
Area Ten 0.07.0.07.0.07-0.01.0.07-0.0:;;
,Area Eleven 0.01.0.0'1.0.07-0.0'1.0.07-O.O:{I.Area Twelve 0.07.0.01.0.0%0.0i-0.07.0.07.
Area Thirteen 11.97.14.77.11.37.14.1:'10.07-12.67-
Area Fourteen 1.8'1.3 ')'1 1.87.3.2i.1.5i..,MIl
...1.WI/I;
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.37.1.1'1.0.37.0.9i.0.37-0.91.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1.27.2.4:'1.1.27-2.2~1.0'1.2.0';
Kenai Peninsula 33.71.37.77.33.17-37.1'1.29.1:'33.11.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 2.0%3.4i.1.81.3.2i.1.67-2.87-
Southeast Alaska 2.1'1.3.57.LSi.3.21.1.5i.2.7:~
Elsewhere in Alaska 8.8i.11.47.8.4i.10.9i.7.n 9.5i.
OIJtside Alaska 0.27-0.8'1.0.1'1.o.n 0.17-O.7i:
B-80
Table B.68.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Salmon Fishing by Area
\
\{
\
I \
. I
I
'(
I )
\\
")
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGH ~.{In or out of Alaska 6%90 73910 67750 72030 59600 64040 I IInAlaska705607474068510727606013064570SusitnaStudyArea411204555039440438303356037810
'I
Area One 1220 2390 1130 2260 1050 2140 IAre.~Two 12400 15430 .;11199014990987012640Are.3Ihree 2320 3840 2230 3720 1680 3000
,~Area tOIJr 210 850 210 850 210 850AreaFive158028801490275013102510Are,3 Si>:1490 2750 1310 2510 960 2020 IAreaSeven450.1250 450 1250 370 1120 :)Are.~Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine370H2O37011203701120
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.3 Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen126001566011990149901058013430
I,Area tOIJrteen 1950 3360 1950 3360 1580 288010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy3701120290980290980 I 'Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 1310 2510 1220 2390 1050 2140KenaiPeninslJla357604008035130394303095035120CopperR./Wrange11/Valdez _~:B~t ___3609__....~.__._..~"--.-1950.---.--3360-------1680--3000-------.-•..".--_._---~"_._-_._".._"---~_._"--SoIJthe.3sfAl.isk-a-------;-----_··2230 3720 1950 3.3.6.0 ]580--2890Elsewnere1nAlaska937012080894011600757010060OutsideAl.3sk.3 210 850 140 710 140 710
l
"
B-8l
f [
"
Table B.69.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage,
of Small Town Households Salmon Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
I 1\GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska n.li.74.9i.69.4i.73.4i.61.61.65.Bi;I In Alaska 71.91.75.77.70.1%74.1%62.4i:b6.6:~I
;,I SYsitna StYdy Area 48.47-52.8i.47.6i.52.01.41.91.46.3;~
Area One 0.6i.1.6r.0.6i.1.67-0.57-1.37-
Area Two 17.57-20.91.17.27-20.67.15.3i.18.57-
Area Three 4.5%6.57.4.47.6.47.3.7%1:'&:'''1
,J •...JJ.
Are.:!Foyr 0.2i.0.8i.O.2;{0.8i.0.2i.0.87-
Area five 1.57-2.7%1.57..j '1'(loU :L.31.WI',.
Are.:!Si:<2.47-4.07.2.47-4.07-2.1i.'j C'fI./
..J •.J'I
Area Seven 0.8i.1.8i.0.8r.1.8i.0.6i.1 r.'/J..II i.J,.
Are.:!Eight •Or.0.21..Or.0.2i..Oia O.2X
Area Nine 0.2r.0.8r.o.1i.0.77.0.1i.0.57.
Are.:!Ten 0.0:t.0.07.0.0r.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.O.Oi:o 0"~.i.
Area Twelve 0.0i.0.0r.0.07-0.07-0.0i.0.0i.
Area Thirteen ll.8:t.14.8i.11.6i.14.67.10.87-13.67-
Area Fourteen 2.5:t.4.n 2.4i.4.01.2.0';3.4k
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .O:t.0.47..01.0.4i..Ok 0.4;~
Anchorage/Chygach Mtn.Area 0.6:t.1.4i.0.6i.1.4:t.0.67.1.4;~
Kenai Peninsul.3 13.97.17.1i.l3.3i.16.57.11.8i.14.81.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 9.3:t.12.17-9.2i~12.07-8.67-11.27.
SQYtheast Alaska o.n 1.77-0.67.1.6i.0.37.1.1i.
Elsewhere in Alaska 9.8r.l2.6r.9.67.12.4i.8.17.10.77.
Outside Alaska .0%0.2i.0.07.0.07.0.0:t.0.07.
B-82
Table B.70.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Salmon Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska98GO1040096301018085509130InAlaska99701051097301028086609240SusitnaStudyArea672073306610722058206420Are.3 One 90 220 90 220 70 180Are.3 Two 2420 2900 2380 2860 2120 2570Are.3 Three 620 900 610 890 510 110Are·3 FOIJr 30 110 30 110 30 110AreaFive200380200380160310Are.3 Si>:340 550 340 550 290 490AreaSeven11025011025090220Are·3 Eight 0 30 0 30 0 30Are.3 Nine 30 110 20 90 10 70
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 1640 2050 1610 2020 1490 1890
Area FOIJrteen 350 570 340 550 280 470
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0 50 0 50 0 50
Anchor.3'je/ChlJ'jach Mtn.Area 80 200 80 200 80 200
f{enai Peninsula 1930 2370 1850 2280 1640 2050
Copper R./Wr.3o'je11fV.31dez 1300 _!§70 ~_12~9__._J6_6_0_.__1190'-'__.-1560_
...-....-...----.~-Soutnea-sCAV3SK.3 .-..--.-'---'1"60---230 90 220 50 1.5_QL-_
-~~~~~El_sewhere~trIAt:~K~.3-----r3·@17501340172011301480
Outside Alaska 0 30 0 0 0 0
B-83 ,
,'\,(
I,I
"I
I '~','
\
I r
,~
("I'I
ii.J'
1.1
\
\
\1
i .r
Table B.71.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Salmon Fishing by Area
,-,------,-.,RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~70.77-76.5%66.6%72.6%55.87-62.2i.
In Alaska 72.7i:78.3i.68.5i.:.74.5~57.n 64.3:~
Susitna Study Are~55.27-61.61.52.5i-59.1i.45.0i.51.67.
Area One 2.7%5.3%2.n 5.37.'1 1:.,4.91.wuJI.
Are;~'Cwo 19.77.25.Ii::18.8%24.27-16.57.21.n
Area Three 2.07.4.4i.2.0;~4.47.1.77.3.9~
.Area FOlJr .0%0.87-.Or.0.87-0.07.0.77-
Area Five 0.8~2.6i.~..~~1.97.0.37.1 1'.1
1
'.ii.
Area Si>:2.37.4.77.2.3%4.77-1.:3%3.3%
Area Seven 1.27.3.07.1.27.3.0i.0.87.2.67.
Are:~Eight 0.07.0.07-0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07-
Area Nine 0.47.1.87-0.0%0.37-0.07.0.37.
Are~Ten 0.07-0.0%0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0%0.0%o 11"O.Oi~0.01.a\ih
Are:~Twelve 0.07.0.0%0.07-0.01.0.07-0.0r.
Area Thirteen 11.67.16.27.1l.4i.16.07.9.91.14.1:!
Are.~Fourteen 4.1i.7.1%4.0i;7.07.')'"'u 6.1%oJ •.J/~
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.07.0.5%0.0i.O.5~~0.07-0.5i.
Anchorage/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 0.27-1.47-0.27-1.47-0.27-1.2i.
f(enai Peninsula 12.67-17.41.11.07-15.47.8.8%13.07.
Copper R./Wrangel1/V~ldez 10.0%14.27.8.8%12.a~I:o~9.27..J.v/.
Southeast Alask~0.87.2.67-0.8%2.6%0.37.2.4j~
Elsewhere in Alaska 4.31.7.5%3.8%6.8%3.3%6.1i.
Outside A1ask.~0.2:1.2%0.27.1.27-.0:0.8i.
B-84
Table B.n.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Salmon Fishing by Area
j
f(
I
'II
1
/~
',:.~
I
,)
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAl~sk~1880 2040 1770 1930 1480 1660InAlask~1930 2080 1820 1980 1540 1710Susitn~StUdy Are~1470 1640 1400 1570 1200 1370Are.3 One 70 140 70 140 70 130Are;:.Two 520 670 500 640 440 580Are.3 Three 50 120 50 120 50 100Are.:!rOIJr 0 20 0 20 0 20Are.3 Five 20 70 10 50 10 40Are.3 Six 60 130 GO 130 30 90AreaSeven308030802070Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine1050010010AreaTen0000
0 0 0Are.:!Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.3 Thirteen 310 430 300 420 260 380AreaPOIJrteen1101901101909016010HilesNorthofDenaliHwy010010010Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 10 40 10 40 .0 30f{enai PeninslJl~340 460 290 410 240 340CopperR./Wrangel1/Valdez 260 380 230 340 150 250SoutheastAlaska2070·----...-.--·.·.....-----..--20.··-----...·-70 -------..··---20-·-·(50-----_...-...-.__...__.."._-~-_..._.~-_."-~-'--~-..-....-.---E1sewhere'yn--Al.3sk:a •....•----..._---_.'-"--'-'--
0 0 30 0 20
B-85
~'j
'J
}
I
Table B.73.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 46.4i.49.2%44.8i.47.6i.38.27-41.0%
In Alask.3 46.37-49.17-44.77.47.57-38.37-41.11.
Susitna Study Area 26.27-28.6i.25.4i:.l'J"O~I 21.6i.24.0~wi al.U.
Area One 0.7%1.37-0.77-1.37-O.6Z 1.2i.
Are.:!'[WQ 7.6i.9.2i....,C'I"9.17-6.27.7 .G;!1.;,;1.
Area Three 1.5:'2.3i.1.57-2.3%1.1i.1.77.
Are.3 Four 0.2i.0.6i.O.2i.O.6X 0.1%O1l5l
Area Five 1.0i.1.Gi.1.07.1.67.0.87.1.4~
Are.3 Sil-:0.91.1.5i.0.81.1.4i.0.6i:1.0i.
Area Seven 0.67.1.07.O.5:t Ij.97.0.4i.0.8i.
Area Eight 0.07-0.07.0.07-0.01.0.0i.0.01.
Area Nine 0.57.0.97.0.5i.0.91.0.5i.O.SI%
Are.3 Ten 0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.0i.0.01.0.07-0.07.0.07.o.Oi~
Are;~Twelve 0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07.
Area Thirteen 9.27.10.87-8.97.10.57.7.8%9.4;~
Are.3 Fourteen 0.87-1.47-0.87-l.47.~"'"1.3i~V.I I.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.17.0.57.0.1%o co'!0.17-0.57..;,;,.
Anchor.3ge/Chug.3ch Mtn.Are.3 0.97.1.5i.0.87-1.47.0.67.1.07.
f(enai Peninsul.3 22.67.25.0i.'1'1 '1'1 24.6i.19.4i.21.6i...:..:aIUI.
Copper R./Wrangel1/Valdez 1.87-2.67.l.Bi.2.67.1.5i.2.3;~
Southeast Alaska 1.47.2.2%1.27.1.87.0.97.1.57.
Elsewhere in Alask~5.47-6.87-5.2~6.47.4.17.5.37.
Outside Alaska 0.17.0.37.0.17.0.37..Oi.0.27.
B-86
Table B.74.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
/
J
\~
,]
\I
\
I
.1
tII
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLDW_..HIGHIn-or-oYt-of-Al~sk~5698U-6-(J370 55020 58410 46950 50270InAl.3ska 56860 60250 54900 58280 47070 50400SusitnaStYdyArea321203515031150341502656029410Are.:!One 890 1570 890 1570 780 1430Are.:!Two 9370 11250 9250 11130 7610 9330AreaThree187028001870280013202120Are.:!FOIJr 280 710 280 710 180 550AreaFive121019801210198010001700Are·3 Si>:1100 1840 1000 1700 680 1280AreaSeven680128058011404701000Are.:!Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine58011405801140580.1140AreaTen000000AreaEleven00----Area-Twelve-.-_.._-~.__.._-0 "----0·-0 0 0 0AreaThirteen11260132901090012910960011510AreaFOIJrteen1000170010001700890157010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy180550180550180550AnchorageiChijgachMtn.Area 1100 1840 1000 1700 680 1280KenaiPeninslJla277703066027290301602379026540CopperR./Wrange11/Valdez 2200 3200 2200 3200 1870 2800SOijtheastAlaska176026601430225011001840_....._.__ItieJolher_e._in._Al.3sh ____------6670-.,8300----------fiSJO------7910----------5050-------6491r-
B-87'
Table B.7S.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 45.47-49.6%44.07.48.2X 37.5i.41.7%
In Al.3ska 45.37-49.57-43.'37.48.17.37.67.41.87.
Susitna Study Area 24.67.28.47-23.97-27.77.2001%23.74
Area One 0.67-1.47.0.67.1.47-0.57-1 .•,/.,J,.
Area Two 6.8';9.0%6.77.8.9';5.37.7.3%
Area Three 1.27.2.4%1.2%2.4%0.87.1.87.
Are·3 Pour 0.1i.0.7i:0.17-0.77.o.li;0.57.
Area Five 0.87.1.87.0.81.1.87.o '1'/1.57-a/la
Area Si:<0.77.1.5i.0.67.1.47-0.3i.1.17-
Area Seven 0.3:>:1.1:'0.37.0.97.o ')'/0.87..y,"
Are·3 Eight 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0%
Area Nine 0.37.I.U 0.37-1.1i.o 0.31.1.Ii:
I
Area Ten 0.07.0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07.0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.
Area Twelve 0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0i.
(Area Thirteen 8.77.11.37.8.47.11.07.7.37-9.7k
Are·3 Fourteen 0.6%1.47.0.67.1.47-0.57.1.37.
!10 Miles North of Denali Hwy O.li.0.7%0.1%0.7:!0.17.o '1'/,Ill
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.8i.1.8i.0.77.l.n 0.57.1.37-
Kenai Peninsula 23.67.27.2%23.4i.27.07.20.47-24.07.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 1.D.:2.a 1.Ii.2.17-1.Oi~2.07.
SOIJtheast Alas~.a 1.37.2.5';1.17.2.17.0.87.1.87.
Elsewhere in Alaska 5.27-7.27-4.9';6.97-3.87.5.67.
Outside Alaska •Or.0.47..Or.0.47..07.0.2;'
B-88
".J
t
I
"1
)
'J
!)
,J
\)
)
\l
..~
\
rI
:\
1984 I ILOWHIGH
39860 44260
r3996044370
21400 25120
530 1380 (
156007790
870 1890
70 560
700 1640 ..)
370 1120
210 850
0 0
J3701120
0 0
HIGH
51210
51100
29370
1510
9490
2510
710
1890
1510
980
o
1120
o
o 0 0
11640 7770 10280
1510 530 1:380
710 140 710
1760 530 1380
28720 21710 25450
2260 1050 2140
2260 870 1890--7330 -------~-4040---------5-9-40"'~--------
1980 -1985
LOW
46720
46610
25430
610
7080
1310
140
870
610
290
o
370
o
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
o
8970
610
140
780
24810
1130
1130
·········5210
B-89
EVER
LOW HIGH
48200 52700
48100 52590
26160 30130
610 1510
7180 9610
1310 2510
140 710
870 1890
700 1640
370 1120
o 0
370 1120
o 0
~to
o 0
9270 11970
610 1510
140 710
870 1890
25020 28940
1130 2260
1400 2630
·55007670
Table B.76.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Alaska
In Alaska
Susitna Study Area
Ar·e.3 One
Are.'3 Two
Area Three
Are.'3 tOfJr
Are.3 Five
Are.'3 Sil':
Area Seven
Area Ei9ht
Area Nine
Area Ten
Area Eleven-'-.----.~-~~---.------------Area-'r-welve -
Area Thirteen
Are·3 FOIJrteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chu9ach Mtn.Area
f{en.3i PeninslJla
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez
Southeast Alaska
..........Elsewherein··Al.'3sh
Table B.77.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentag~
of Small Town Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
I LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
,I In or out of Al~sk~45.67-50.07.43.4!47.8!37.07.41.2i.
In Alaska 45.67-50.07-43.5!47.9i.37.IX 41.37-
Susitn~Study Area 29.77.33.7i.29.0i.33.0i.25.87-29.87-
Area One 0.37.0.97-0.37-0.97-0.2%o .J"•vi.
Area Two 10.1i.12.97-9.8i.12.6i.8.71.11.3%
Area Three oj ,,·t 3.67-2.2X 3.6X 1.87-1"\"W["".....,.~.~/.
Are:~tOIJr 0.17.0.5i.o.n 0.57.•Oi~0.4i:
Area five 1.07.2.07.1.0i:2.0i.0.87-1.8;~
Area Si>:1.Ii.2.3~1.Ii.2.37-1.0i.2.07.
Area Seven 0.97-1.9i.0.87.1.87-0.6i.l.(jj~
Area Eight .Oi;0.27-.Oi.0.27-0"O.2;~•J.
Area Nine 0.1%0.57-.07-0.47-•Or.0.4i.
Are.3 len 0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07-0.0i.0.0%
Area Eleven 0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.
Are.3 Twelve 0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.07.
Area lhirteen 8.47.11.0i::8.37-10.97-7 '1.,10.3i.I .lla
Are.3 Fourteen 0.77.1.77.0.77-1.7i~0.6i.1.6i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .Oi::0.2i..Oi.0.27..0%0.2%
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.2i.0.8i.0.27.0.8i.0.1i.0.71.
Kenai Peninsula 11.8i.14.87.11.07-14.0i.8.87.l1.4i.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 4.4i.6.4i.4.0i.6.07-3.6i.5.4~
Southeast Alaska 0.57-1.3%0.4%1.2i:.O.2~0.87.
Elsewhere in Alaska 4.97-6.97-4.47-6.47-3.67-5.4~~
Outside Alaska .07.0.4i..07.0.2i..Oi.O.2i:
B-90
Table B.78.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
,1
\I
220
750
30
500
o
B90
30
GI0
oo
)
)'I
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS ,.l
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 19BO -19B5 19B4
:;')LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska633069406020663051305720InAl.3sk.3 6330 6940 6040 6650 5140 5740SusitnaStudyArea412046BO4020458035904130
)Are.3 One 40 130 40 130 30 110Are.:!Two 1400 1790 1360 1750 1210 1570Are.3 Three 300 500 300 500 250 440 ~-\Area Four 10 70 10 70 0 50Are.3 Five 130 2BO 130 2BO 110 250 (
Area Si>:160 310 160 310 130 280AreaSeven12027011025090'1'11\W4l;.JAre·3 Eight 0 30 0 30 0 30AreaNine10700500
Outside Alaska
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 1170 1530 1150 1510 1070
Are.:!Fourteen 100 230 100 230 90
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0 30 0 30 0 30
Anchor.3g e/Ch ug.:!ch litn.Are.3 30 110 30 110 20 90
Kenai Peninsula 1640 2050 1530 1940 1220 1590
Copper R.IWr ange 111V.31dez HQ.B'3_0 5GO B30 ...-----500 ..------750 ..._-----------SoUtheasCA'l:iSTi.a--------70
\)
'1
I
B-91
iJ
\
".I
I I
I
Table B.79.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
B-92
Table B.80.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households King Salmon Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska150016701340152010501220InAlask.3 1480 1650 1320 1500 1040 1210SusitnaStudyArea94011108901060760920Are.3 One 30 80 30 80 30 80AreaTwo360490340460290410Are.3 Three 30 80 30 80 20 70Are.3 tOIJr 0 10 0 10 0 10AreaFive207020601040Area56104010401040AreaSeven206020602060Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine010010010AreaTen000000AreaEleven000000AreaTwelve---_____0 -0-----------0---0----0--------0-Area -Illirteen-----
240 350 230 340 200 300Are.3 FOIJrteen 30 80 30 80 20 6010HilesNorthofDenaliHwy000000Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0 20 0 20 0 20Ken.3i Peninsul.3 280 400 230 330 170 260CopperR./Wrangell/Valdez ISO 270 160 250 70 130SoutheastAlaska4010020602060ElsewhereinAlaska901607014070_130____________________..__.._-_._.---_.__._~---------~.."--_.__.--Outside Alaska------,."..--._------------O----JO----0 30
B-93 _
I
J
I
\__J
,-1
I1
r.J
\
I I
Table B.8l.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 63.5i.66.1i.61.9i.64.5i.54.47.57.27-
In Alaska 63.37.65.9%61.6i.64.27.54.3i.5'7.1X
Susitna study Area 36.97.39.51.35.67.38.27.30.9i.'jJj r:at
"..I...,•.J/.
Area One 1 ..,./1.9i.1.3;~1.9:'I.I:!1.7i..,,),.
Area Two 11.5i.13.3i.11.17.12.9i.9.41.11.0i.
Area Three 2.57.3.57.2.47.3.4;!2.1i.2.9i.
Area Four 0.2i.0.6i.0.2i.0.67-0.27.0.6i.
Area five 1.5!2.37.1.4Z "l "l'!,rjlj 2.1;~.w.~/.1.':;/•
Area Sil-:1.7i.'}C·'1.6i.2.4i.1.2i.1.Bi.",•.Jia
Area Seven 0.57-0.97-0.57.o.g;!0.57.o.9;~
Area Eight 0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.
Are.3 Nine 0.57.0.97.0.57-0.9%0.47.0.81.
Area Ten 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.07.
Area Eleven O.OY.0~07.0.07.0.07-0.0i.O.Oi~
Area Twelve 0.0i.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.
Area Thirteen 10.9%12.7%10.47.12.2%9.6j~11.2i.
Area tOIJrteen 2.2i.3.0i.2.2%310;~1.77.2.5%\,10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.47.0.87.0.3i.0.77.0.37.o.7j~I Anchor .3ge /Chugach Mtn.Ar ea 1.27.LSi.1.27.1.8i.1.0i.1.6i.
Ken.3i Peninsula 28.77.31.37.23.2%30.87.24.8%27.2%
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 3.27.4.2i.3.0i.4.0i.2.G~3.67-
Southeast Alaska 2.1~2.97-1.97-2.77.1.5i.2.3%
Elsewhere in Alaska B.ai.10.47.B.4?lO.O?7.2i.8.GX
Outside Alaska 0.17.0.57-0.1:'0.5i.0.1%Oa57.
B-94
Table B.82.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
B-95
!
J
\
:!
I
}
I)
I
.)
J
.~
\
\.1
1j
)
\
1
1984
LOW HIGH
66810 70180
66690 70060
37940 41110
1320 2120
11490 13550
2540 3600
280 710
1650 2530
1430 2250
580 1140
(}0
470 1000
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
75940 79220
75570 78850
43660 46940
1540 2390
13630 15830
2990 4130
280 710
1760 2660
1980 2930
580 1140
o 0
580 1140
EVER
LOW
77920
77670
45240
1540
14100
3100
280
1870
2090
580
o
580
o
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Alaska
In Alaska
Susitna Study Are::!
Are::!One
Are.:!Two
Area Three
Are.~Four
Are::!Five
Are.:!Six
Area Seven
Are.:!Eight
Area Nine
Area Ten
HIGH
81170
80920
48540
2390
16340
4260
710
2800
3060
1140
o
1140
0_.__._.._
o 0 (}0 0
Are::!Twe 1ve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 13390 15580 12800 14950 11730 13800
Are.:!FOIJrteen 2650 3730 2650 3730 2090 3060
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 470 1000 370 850 370 850
Anchorage/Chyg::!ch Mtn.Are::!1430 2250 1430 2250 1210 1980
Kenai Peninsula 35270 38380 34660 37760 30430 33410
Copper R.lWr::!nge11lV.:!ldez 3900 5180 3670 4920 3220 4390
.--------------Southe::!st-A1as~.a----------..:····---.z540---3600---------2310---3330----------TS70---280-ir-----------
______-----"-E"..lsaw.ber_e_irLAhsk::!10780-1-2'7-90 103-10-1-2280 87BO-rO'GTO
Outside Alaska 180 550 180 550 180 550
Table B.83.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
\
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
I I GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 19BO -f9B5 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1~sk~61.97-65.97-60.27-64.47-52.9i.57.17-
In Alask.;)61.n 65.7i.60.0r.64.27.52.77-56.97-
Susitna Study Area 34.77.38.77-33.47-37.47.28.87.32.87-
Area One 1.17-2.17.1.1i.2.1X 1.0i.2.07.
Are.;)Two 10.17.12.97-9.87.12.47-8.2i.10.6%
Area Three 2.0%3.47-1.97-"'J'I 1.67."1 .-.-;J.w/a ,.:...0/:11
Area Pour 0.17-o.n 0.17.0.77.0.17.0.77.
Area Five 1.37.2.57.1.37.4j r:./1.27.'1 "'!l..:.a.oJ!."a!.J/.
Are.;)Si>:1.4i.2.67.1.27.2.4i~0.9i.1 q'l..10
Area Seven 0.3%1.17.0.37-1.17.O.3~1.17.
Are.;)Eight 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.01.0.0%
Area Nine 0.3%1.17-0.37-1.l:~0.37.1.1:'
Are.;)Ten 0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07-
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07.
Are.;)Twelve 0.07-0.0i.0.07.0.07-O.Oi;0.0i.
Are.;)Thirteen 10.37.13.17-9.87-12.47.8.97-1l.5i:
Area fOIJrteen 1.87.3.0r.1.87.3.07-1.47.2.6i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.37-0.97.0.37.0.97-0.37-0.9i.
Anchorage/Chug~ch Mtn.Are~1.Ii.2.1r.1.0i.2.0i.0.9i.1.97.
~(enai PeninslJl~30.57.34.57.30.07.34.07.2&.37-30.17.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 1.97.3.3i.1.87-':l ")'1 1.67.2.8r.oJ .../,
Southeast Alaska 2.07-3.47.1.8%3.07.1.57-2.77-
Elsewhere in Alaska 8.47-10.8%a.07-10.4;~6.87.9.0?
Outside Alaska 0.17.0.57.0.1%0.57.0.17.O.5~
II
I
B-96
Table B.84.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Other Salmon FiShing by Area
)
i
I
I
l
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
.~
\
1J
!
J
)
}
2390
2020
1220
960
1984
LOW HIGH
56180 60660
55970 60450
30640 34790
1050 2140
8670 11300
1680 3000
140 710
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OlJt of Al.3sk.'3 65710 70030 63990 68350
In Alaska 65490 69820 63780 68140
SIJS i tn.:!Study Are.:!36810 41150 35450 39750
Area One 1130 2260 1130 2260
.Are.:!Two 10780 13650 10380 13200
Area Three 2140 3600 2050 3480
Are.'3 FOlJr 140 710 140 no
Area Five 1400 2630 1400 2630
Area Six 1490 2750 1310 2510
Area Seven 370 1120 370 1120 370 1120
Are.:!Ei'3ht_~~~__~____._0 ..__~-~~~~---O----~O ~~---O-----o~~~~-------~AreaNine-~370 1120 370 1120 370 1120
Area len 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 10980 13870 10380 13200 94'70 12200
Area tOIJrteen 1860 3240 1860 3240 1490 2750
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 290 980 290 980 290 980
Anchor.'3ge/ChlJg.:!ch Mtn.Area 1130 2260 1050 2140 ~2o2L ~
..-----.--~--~---f{enai·-PeninslJla-~---·-·--·~~32410·~-·~36630--~----3r890-·--·3b091r--------27930 31980
------c.Q.p.peu.iWr~angellI-V;illdez 20§O~4BO 1950--3360 IliaO 3000
Southeast Ahska 2140 3600 1860 3240 1580·2880
Elsewhere in Al.3ska 8870 11520 8470 11070 7180 9610
OIJtside Al.3ska 70 560 70 560 70 560
\
j
B-97
.I
I
If
Table B.8S.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1~sk~68.11.72.17.66.57.70.5i:513.27-6:3114i:
In A1.3ska 68.1%72.17.66.57-70.5%59.37.6':1 <:'110111101111
SIJS i tn.3 Study Are.3 44.07.48.4i.43.37.47.7i.:38.3i~42.77.
Area One 0.67.1.67.0.6%1.67.0.6;'L4:~
Are·3 Two 15.Gi.19.07.15.47.18.81.13.67.16.8;(
Ar ea Iilr ee .4 'i'!6.27.4.17-G.1:·;3.4:;l;"'jD!....'-.Jew/•
Are.3 FOIJr 0.27-0.87.o '1'/0.87.O.2~0.8%...,.
Are.3 Five 1.27-2.4%1 °1 1/2.4i;1.07.2.0i..LiliA/II
Are.3 Six 2.01.3.47.2.0k 3.41.1 "1/3.nJ.../,.
Area Seven 0.57-1.3%0.57.1.3i~u.5i.1 'j'!.t.J/a
Are.3 Eight •OJ.0.27..07.0.2i..O;~0.27.
Area Nine O.2i~0.37.0.2?0.87.0.1i.0.71.
Are~Ten 0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0i.O.O;~
Are.3 Twe 1ve 0.0i.O.Oi:0.0i.0.07.O.Oi.0.0i.
Area Thirteen 11.0%14.0%10.9i.13.77.10.1i.12.9i~
Are:~FOIJrteen 2.47.4.07.2.37-3.97.1.9X 3.37-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .Oi.0.47..07.0.4;'0"0.47..'"Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are.3 0.67.1.47.0.6i.1.47-0.67.1.47.
Kenai Peninsula 12.97-15.97.12.47-15.47.11.07.14.07.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 9.li.11.77.9.0%11.67.8.31.10.97.
Southe:ast Alaska 0.6%1.67-0.6i.1.4%0.3%1.11.
Elsewhere in Alaska 9.17.11.7i.8.81.11.4i:7.41.9 r",,01.
Outside Alaska .07.0.2%0.0i:0.07.0.07.0.07.
B-98
Table B.86.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
)
)
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS )
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984 ~"1LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAl~sk~9450 10010 9220 9790 8210 8800InAlask.:!9450 10010 '3220 9790 8220 8820Susitn~Study Are~6110 6nO bOLO 6620 5320 5920 ~lAreaOne902209022080200Are.3 Two 2170 2630 2140 2600 1890 2330AreaThree590860570840470720
J
Are.3 FOIJr 30 110 30 110 30 110AreaFive170330170330130280Are.3 51:-:280 470 280 470 240 430
1
Are·:!Seven 70 180 70 180 70 180Are.3 Eight 0 30 0 30 0 30AreaNine3011030110
I00AreaEleven000000Are.3 Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen153019401510191014001790 ),Area FOIJrteen 340 550 320 540 260 46010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy060050050Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 80 200 80 200 80 200KenaiPeninslJ1.3 1780 2210 1720 2140 1530 1940 I,.~....,_._,___,.~,_CoppeLR.LWr..3ngelllV.31dez_--_-126o-'--1630-----~,1_240~~~_:_-1610·-..--..-,·--H50-~-'15tO--··-·-·,·····
Elsewhere in Alaska
OIJtside Alask~
1260
o
1630
30
1220
o
1590
o
1020
o
1360
o
~l
,\
/1
B-99
Table B.87.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH 1..0W HIGH
In or out of Alaska 70.7'1.76.57.66.57...,.,t;'-t 56.7'1.63.17.I"•.J/.
In Alaska 70.1i!75.97.65.97.71.97-1:'.-1;'"62.97.-.iO.,.u.I !8usitna Study Area 52.71.59.37.50.Ii.56.77-42.61.49.2i.
I,.J Area One 2.2%4.67.')'1'/4.67-2.07-4 ,..,',.w .&&4.•.wI•
Are.3 '!wo 18.67.24.07-18.0i.23.4~15.67-20.67.
Are.3 Three 2.lI.4.57.2017-4.5~1.9i.4.17.
Are·3 Four .Oi.0.87-.07-0.87.0.07.o rtl/•/I.
Area Five 0.41.1.BI:0.37-1.57.0.27-1.41.
I Are.3 S1:-:2.47.4.8i.2.2k 4.6i.1.27-3.01.
Area Seven 1.27.3.0i:1.1:,2.9Z o.n rt I"IDIJ~.~l.
Are.3 Eight 0.07.0.07-0.0i.0.07-0.01.0.07.
Are.3 Nine 0.47.LSi.0.07.0.3%0.01:0.3?
Area Ten 0.07-0.0i.0.07.0.07-O.O?0.07-
Area Eleven 0.07-0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07-OQO~
Are.3 Twelve 0.07-0.01.O.O!0.07.0.07-O.Oi:
Area Thirteen 11.67.16.2%11.47-16.01.10.07.14.4i.
Are.3 Fourteen 4.1i.7.17-3.77-6.n 3.07-5.87-
10 Hiles North of Denali Hwy 0.07-0.57.0.0i.0.57-0.07-O.5;~
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.27-1.4i.0.27-1.'Ii.0.2i.'"l'fJ.'~h
f(enai Peninsula 11.77.16.37.10.2:'1'4,6i.8.67.1 r"l r.,
.1,4.0/.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 8.97-13.17-7.8i.11.6i.5.67.9.0i.
Southeast Alaska 0.87.2.67.0.8i::2..6%0.87.2.4;~
Elsewhere in Alaska 4.1i:7.17-3.67.6.4i.3.1i.5.9?
Outside Alaska .07.1.07-.07-1.07..07.0.87-
B-100
Table B.88.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Other Salmon Fishing by Area
}
-I
..\
I
\
\
1
I
J
\
J
1
IJ
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
.GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofA1~sk~1880 2040 1770 1930 1510 1680InA1~sKa 1860 2020 1750 1910 1500 1670Susitn~Study Are~1400 1580 1330 1510 1130 1310Are~One 60 120 60 120 50 110Are.:!Two 490 640 480 620 410 550Are.:!Three 60 120 60 120 50 110Are.:!FOIJr 0 20 0 20 0 20AreaFive105010401040Are.:!Sil-:60 130 60 120 30 80Are.3 Seven 30 80 30 80 20 60Are.:!Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.3 Nine 10 50 0 10 0 10Are~Ten 0 0
0 0 0 0 0AreaTwelve000000AreaThirteen310430300420270380Are.:!FOlJrteen 110 190 100 180 SO 15010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy010010010Anchorage/ChlJgach Mtn.Area 10 40 10 40 0 30KenaiPeninsula310430270390230340CopperR./Wrangell/Valdez 240 350 210 310 150 240-----~-----~---------------~---
____________SOIJ_tJ!e_asl_.A1as~..3_..._-"----_._-.-.------20----------70-------·.:w--------70-20 60
0 30 0 30 0 20
I
I
B-lOl
Table B.89.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Trout Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1990 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 56.51.59.31.54.21.57.0~45.7i.48 .5i~
In Alaska 54.81.57.6i.52.9,55.7i.45.27-48.0i.
Susitna Study Area 34.51.37.11.33.21.35.87.28.4i.31.0;~
Area One 1.8%2.61.1.7~2.5%1.5%'1 ')-,.....'1.u.
Area Two 7.9%9.5i.7.7i.9.3i.6.77-8.1i.
Area Three 3.97.,5.17.3.6%4.87-tj'1"!4 ')'i'-..Ja ..l.."",.
Area four 0.37.O.7i.0.3i.0.7'1.o.1i:,-.1:'.:
t)•.Jja
Area five 2.91.3.9i.2.91.3.'31.'1 lJ'I 3.lI..-:.taw;'
Area Sb;1.47.Ij -1"t 1.37.2.11.1.27-1.8;~a:.a';'l.
Area Seven 0.67-1.2%0.67.1.27-0.57.0.9i.
Area Ei'jht 0.07-0.0i.0.07-0.07.o.o;~O.O;~
Area Nine 0.81.1.4%0.77-1.3i:O.b7-1.07.
Area Ten .01.0.2i..Oi.0.27..0%0.2i.
Area Eleven 0.1i.0.3i.0.1i.0.37..",0.2;'.v,•
Are.:!Twelve .01.0.2%•01.O.2X 0.01.0.01.
Area Thirteen 6.57.7.97.r''J'f 7.77-5.67-7.Oi~lJ 81J/a
Ar e::l f our teen 3.87.5.01.3.6i:4.8i.3.1i.4.11.
10 Mil,es North of Denali Hwy 0.51.0.91.0.57.0.91.0.41.0.8?
Anchora'je/Chu'jach Mtn.Area 3.11.4.17-3.07-4.0i.2.4k 3.41.
f{enai PeninslJ1a 16.77.18.9%16.27.18.2X 13.87-15.a;!
Copper R./Wrao'jell/Valdez 1.47-2.2%1.4i.2.27-1.n 1.7%
Southeast Alaska 1.Ii.1.7%1.0i.1.6i.0.8i.1.4j~
Elsewhere in Alaska 11.17-12.91.10.81.12.6i.9.27-10.8i.
Outside Al.3sk.3 1.31.2.1%0.9%1.57-0.4i.0.87.
B-102
Table B.90.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Trout Fishing by Area
)
1
I
l
(
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
2250
1140
o
1280
2~O ..
230
1984
LOW HIGH
56120 59510
55510 58900
34910 38010
1870 2800
8190 9970
3900 5180
180 550
2760 3860
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Al.3sk.3 69400 72750 66560 69940
In Alask.3 67300 70670 64960 68350
Susitna Study Area 42320 45570 40730 43960
Are.3 One 2200 3200 2090 3060
Are:~Two 9720 11640 9490 11380
Area Three 4820 6230 4470 5840
Are.3 FOl.lr 370 850 370 850
Are.3 Five 3560 4790 3560 4790
Area Six 1760 2660 1650 2530 1430
Area Seven 780 1430 780 1430 580
Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Nine 1000 1700 890 1570 680
Area Ten 20 _230 -2L--230--20-
..-······--AreaEleven--90 400 90 400 20
Area Twelve 20 230 20 230 0 0
Area Thirteen 7960 9720 7730 9460 6910 8560
Area Fourteen 4700 6100 4470 5840 3790 5050
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 580 1140 580 1140 470 1000
Anchorage/Ch 'Jg.3ch litn.Are.3 3790 5050 3670 4920 2990 4130
Kenai Peninsula 20550 23150 19830 22400 16960 19370
Copper R./Wr.3n gell/V.31dez 1760 2660 1760 2660 1320 21~_0 _.._.,....__.
,--------.._...Southe,3st_A1aska .._...·--1-320 ..-..-2120-··--1210---1980'-----,.1"'00i\iiO~---,1""700
Elsewhere in aL3ska IJ630----15830 c3270-1~450 112~r32~~'-------
Outside Alaska 1650 2530 1100 1840 470 1000
1
I,I
I
1
B-103
)
i I
Table B.91-
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Trout Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH •'111 HIGH LOW HIGHJ..l.ln
In or OIJt of Al.'3sk.'3 55.U 59.3%52.7%56.91.44.11.48.37.
In Alask.'3 53.21.57.4%51.37-55.57.43.57.47.7~
Susitna Study Area 31.97-35.91.30.77.34.77-26.07.29.87.
Area One 1.67.2.81.1.51.'1 r"J-J 1.37-2.5~...,-t.
Area Two 6.97.9.37.6.97.9.l;~co rya,7.9X.J.,i.
Area Three 2.97-4.5;~2.77-4.3k q 1'"'1'"1 oJ r1-,1~.Ji.1.ol.11.
Area FOIJi'0.27.0.87.0.21.O.S!.o.l;~0.57.
Area Five -,C''¥3.97..~.t:'1U 3.97.1.87.q ",1:/....J/.~.,J,{.J •.a:.ii.
Area Sil:1.2k 2.47-1.2%2.2%0.97.1.SII.
Area Seven 0.5%1 'i'/0.47.1 ')"1 0.37.l.nIwi.aula
Area Eight 0.07-0.0i.a.Oi:0.07-0.07.0.01.
Area Nine o.n 1.57-0.6:'1.47.O.5Z 1 lJrJf",,10
Area Ten .O~0.27..Oi.o ""0.0f.O.OZ•.:.1.
Area Eleven .Or.0.4%.07.0.4i..Ok O.2j~
Are.'3 Twelve 0.01.0.01.0.07.0.0i.0.0%0.01.
Area Thirteen 6.2k 8.4i::6.0i::8.2%5.47.7 .4i~
Area Fourteen 3.37-4.9i.3.1i.4.71.t")r:.,4.li.....J,.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.3i.1.17-0.31.1.17.o 1)"1.li.1 wI.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 3.21.4.8Z 3.11.4.77-'i'c.'/'j q'ja:..-..JI.,,,;.",,
Kenai PeninslJla 17.77-21.17.17.17.20.5i~14.57.1'1 ..,.,
l ,II.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 0.8%1.8i.0.87-1.8?0.67-1.47-
Southeast Alaska 1.07.2.07.0.97.1.97.O.7~1.7i.
Elsewhere in Al;:\sk::\10.n 13.5%10.47.13.2%8.87.11.47-
OIJtside Alaska 1.37.2.57.0.87.1.87.0.37-0.97.
B-104
Table B.92.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Trout Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofA1~sk~58530 62980 55970 60450 46830 51320InAlaska565006098054470589604619050680SusitnaStudyArea3388038140326203684027ij10:3165C'Area One 1680 3000 1580 2880 1400 2630AreaTwo738098307280972060908360Are.3 Three 3080 4780 2890 4540 2420 3Si50AreaFour21085021085070560AreaFive261041902610'4190 1950 3360AreaSi>:1310 2510 1220 2390 960 2020AreaSeven530138045012503701120AreaEight00([0 0 0AreaNine7001640610..151~_~__.__530 __13130-----_._~_.•.._..-~-~-----_...--~Are.3Ten-~-~_.._~------()'--250--·~--O 250 0 0AreaEleven10410104100250Are::!Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen658089206380870057007900Are::!FOIJrteen 3460 5250 3270 5010 2700 431010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy370H2O3701120370H2OAnchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 3370 5130 327.0 5010 2610 4190RenaiPeninsula188302239013210217301545018760CoppeLR.LWr-::1rIgellIV;21dez-----870--1890--~"------870----..-1890----..---610--1510
Elsewhere in A1~ska 11380 14320 11080 13990 9370 12080OutsideAlask.3 1400 2630 870 1890 290 980
B-105
I)
I
I
I
1
Table B.93.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Trout Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~58.2i.62.4~56.4i.60.8i.49.4i.53.8i.
In Al~sk~57.4i.61.8:t 55.8?60.27-49.27.53.6;~
Susitn~Study Are~42.4i.46.8i.41.4i.45.81.3G.3;~41.0i.
Area Orle 1.Ii.2.3i.1.1i.2.3i.1.0i.2.27-
Are.,Two 9.4i.12.2;!9.li.11.77.B.li.10.77.
Area Three 8.47-11.07-8.1i.10.n 7.2k 9.6i.
Are~Four 0.3:'0.91.o .,./o.ai.r.'11'0.8i.."".V.wi•
Area Five 3.57-5.3i.3.47.5.27-3.1k 4 '7~!
...l ."11
Are.,Si:-:1.5i.2.7%1.57-2.77.1.2~2.4i~
Are.3 Seven 0.67-1.67-0.67.1.67.0.67.1.47.
Are::!Eight 0.1i.0.5%0.17-0.57-0.1i.0.51.
Area Nine 0.37.0.97.0.37.0.97-0.37.0.97.
Are.,Ten •or.0.47-.Ok 0.41..07-O.2i.
Area Eleven .07.0.47..0:::0.4:~.0;';0.47.
Are.,Twelve .07-o ."!0"0.2i..Oi.0.2i.Iw/.•J.
Area Thirteen 5.17.7.37-5.07.7.2k 4.6i.I',.,'/IJ.b,.
Area fOIJrteerl 5.0i.7.0i:5.0i;7.0i.4.3~6.3;!
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .07.O.2k 0'/O1l2:t .07.0.27..,.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are~0.67.1.67.0.6i.1.41.0.47.1.27-
f{en:3i Peninsul.3 6.37-8.n 6.1i.8.3%co '1"7.4%.Jaw;'
Copper R./Wr~ngel1/Valdez 4.27-6.27-4.07-6.0i.3.47-5.2%
Southeast Alaska 0.2i.0.87-0.2i.0.8i.0.1i.0.57-
Elsewhere in A1ask~9.67.12.47.9.37-12.17.8 ',,,10.91..wl.
Outside Alask.3 0.4Z 1.27.0.37.1.17.0.1Z 0.57.
B-I06
1
\
I
1
i I
I
\
!I
-\
I
I
1
\
I
I
I .j
f
)
I
B-I07
Table B.94.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Trout Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAlaska80708670'7830·8430 6860 7470InAlaska79708570775083506830744C'Susitna Study Area 5890 6490 5750 6350 5100 5700AreaOne160310160310150300Are::!Two 1310 1690 1260 1630 1130 1480AreaThree117015301130148010001330Are.:!~olJr 40 130 30 110 30 110AreaFive490740470720420660Are.:!Six 200 380 200 380 170 330AreaSeven902209022080200Are.:!Eight 10 70 10 70 10 70AreaNine401304013040
30Are.3 Eleven 0 50 0 50 0 50Are.:!Twelve 0 30 0 30 0 30AreaThirteen7101010700990640noAre.:!Fourteen 690 980 690 980 600 87010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy030030030Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 90 220 80 200 60 170f~enai Pertinsul.3 880 1200 840 1160 730 1020~~__~_________.__Cop.~tJh!Wr.:!ngelUV.:31dez ____~______590 __-----860---------560---830--------4-70---720-Southeast Alaska
1300 1670 1150 1510OutsideAl.3ska 170 50 150 10 70
I (
Table B.9S.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Trout Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~72.9i.78.5i.68.0i.74.0i.58.0i.64.41.
In Al~ska 72.5i~78.17-67.77.73.77.58.07-·64.4i.
Susitn~Study Area 59.6i.66.0i.55.47-61.87-49.47-56.01.
Area One 3.67.6.47.2.7%5.3;~2.7%5.3i~
Are.3 Two 17.37.22.57-17 IS 2i~22.4i.15.5k 20 .5i~
Area Three 6.37-9.97.6.17.9.77.5.47-8.S:!
Area Four 0.07.0.77.0.0i.o.7;~0.01.0.5i.
Area five 4.17.7.1i.4.01.7.0i.3.77.6.5;~
Are·3 Sil-:1.4i.3.4i.1.47.3.4i.1.11.2.9X
Area Seven O.S%2.4%0.87.2.47-0.31:1.7i~
I Are.3 Ei9ht 0.07-0.07-0.01.0.01.0.01.0.07.
I Area Nine 1.6i.3.6i.O.H 1.U 0.'1.0;!•Eo
.J Area Ten 0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.3i.0.07-0.37-o.or.0.37-
Area Twelve 0.0i.0.3i.0.0i.0.37-0.07.0.37-
Area Ihirteen 7.37.11.17.6.97.10.77.6.37.9.97-
Area fOIJrteen 6.37.9.97.5.91.9.31.4.91.B.li.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.51.1.97.0.57.1.91.o r::"!1.'37.•.Jt.
Anchorage/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 0.37.1.77.0.3i.1.7i.0.37-LSi.
f{enai Peninsula 5.67.9.07.4.3%..,r::"t 3.5%6.37.l.oJ,.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 3.07-co',2.9i.C"c.,1.47.3.41..J.u/..J .oJ/•
Southeast Alaska 0.67.2.0,0.67.2.07.0.6i.2.0i~
Elsewhere in Alaska 10.0i.14.47.8.97-13.11.6.71.10.37.
Outside Alaska .07.1.07-.07-0.87.0.07.0.51.
i \I I\._J
B-108
Table B.96.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Trout Fishing by Area
l'
\
I
!
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAl~sk~1940 2090 1810 1970 1540 1710InAlask.3 1930 2080 1800 1960 1540 1710Susitn~Study Are~1590 1760 1470 1650 1310 1490Are~One 90 170 70 140 70 140Are.3 Two 460 600 460 600 410 550AreaThree170260160260140230Are::!F.)IJr 0 20 0 20 0 10Are.3 Five 110 190 110 190 100 170Are.3 Six 40 90 40 90 ':11\80-'vAre.3 Seven 20 60 20 60 10 40Are.3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine40100030030AreaTen00
10 0 10 0 10Are·3 Twe 1ve 0 10 0 10 0 10AreaThirteen190300180280170260Are.3 Fourteen 170 260 160 250 130 22010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy105010501050Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 10 40 10 40 10 40KenaiPeninsul.3 150 240 120 200 90 170CopperR./Wrangell/Valdez 80 150 80 150 40 90
----~-
..___SOIJthe~sLAl,3sk.3_..._._..·················-·--·10 ··-50-"...·---·----10-------·50·'---'-10----50
.._"-~._..__..._.._~._--
Elsewhere in Alaska 27.0---380 240--350 rao --270OutsideAlask.3 0 30 0 20 0 10
B-109
I
Table B.97.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Grayling Fishing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
]
I)
iJ
lJ
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~sk~
In Al.3ska
SIJsi tn.:!St'Jdy Are.:!
Area One
Are.,.Two
Area Three
Are::!four
Are.3 Five
Are::!Si:<
Area Seven
Are::!Eight
Area Nine
Are.3 Ten
Area Eleven
Are::!Twelve
Area Thirteen
Are::!fOIJrteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchor .:!geICh 'JIj.3ch Mtn.AI'ea
f(enai Peninsula
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez
Southeast Alaska
Elsewhere in Al::!sk::!
Outside Alaska
EVER
LOW HIGH
39.47.42.2Z
39.2%42.0%
22.7%25.17.
1.8i.2.67.
5.0%6.27.
1.7%2.57-
O.n:0.57.
2.51.3.57-
1.4i.2.27-
0.87.1.47-
.07.0.2i.
1.07.1.67.
.07.0.27.
.07.0.27-
0.2i.0.6i.
3.67.4.67-
0.97.1.5i::
0.87.1.47.
0.7i.1.37.
7.li.8.5i.
1.47.2.2i:
0.3i.0.7%
13.57.15.5i.
0.17.0.5%
B-110
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
37.1%3g.7i.
36.97.39.57-
21.41.23.8i:
1.7;~2.5X
4.81.6.01.
1.61.2.4i.
O.l!0.51.
2.47.3.47.
1.31.2.17.
0.87.1.47.
.07.O.2;~
0.97.1.57.
.07.O.2i~
.0%0.2%
O.lI.0.57-
3.37.4.37.
0.97.1.5i.
O.n:1.37.
0.6i.:1.27.
6.87.8.2%
1.27.1.81.
0.37.0.77.
12.7%H.n
0.17.0.37.
1984
LOW HIGH
29.77.32.3%
17.47.19.6{'
1.47.2.21.
3./i.4.97.
1.37.1.9;~
o.l;~'0.5;~
1.9;~2.7X
1.07.1.67.
0.67.1.07.
.Oi:0.27-
0.77.1.3i:
0.01.0.07.
0.07.0.07.
0.17.0.37.
O.7i.1.31.
O.G~1.27-
0.57.0.97.
5.6~I.OX
1.07.1.G%
O.3~O.7;~
10.37.12.17.
.07.O.2;~
B-llL
Table B•.98.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Grayling FiShing by Area
)
I
\
I
\
j
\
\
\
I
\
I
I
1
I
I
I
II
I
20 230
1984
LOW HIGH
36480 39620
36480 39620
213S'0 24030
1760 2660
4590 5970
1540 2390
180 550
2310 3330
1210 1980
680 1280
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
48410 51750 .45480 48790
48170 51510 45240 48540
27890 30790 26320 29160
2200 3200 2090 3060
6090 7660 5860 7400
·2090 3060 1980 2930
180 550 180 550
3100 4260 2990 4130
1760 2660 1650 2530
1000 1700 1000 1700
20 230 20 230
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or Oyt of A1~sk~
In Alaska
SYsitn~StYdy Area
Area One
Are~Two
Are.3 Three
Ar e.-a tOIJl'
Are·3 Five
Are.-a Si>:
Area Seven
Area Eight
Area Nine 1210 1980 1100 1840 890 1570
----~__jke;Llen_____---~--~---20---230----iO------'230 -----0 ·---~-o~-
Area Eleven 20 230 20 230 0 0
Are::!Twelve 280 710 180 550 90 400
Area Ihirteerl 4360 5710 4020 5310 3560 4790
Are.3 Foyrteen 1100 1840 llOO 1840 890,1570
10 Miles North of Den.3liHwy 1000 1700 890 1570 7aO 1430
Anchor.-age/Ch 'J'3.3ch Mtn.Are::!890 1570 780 1430 580 1140
Kenai Peninsula 8660 10490 8310 10100 6910 8560
Copper R.IWr .3n ge 11/V.31dez 1760 2660 ..l.43Q__~225(L______~_1210_.~198L ~
-~--~----~-SOlJth-easrA1as~--------.---370--850----370 850 370 850
------Etsewherrtn-Atas~:a r66()O~r9-0-0-0 15650 17990 12680 14820
Outside A1.3ska 180 550 90 400 20 230
Table B.99.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Grayling Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
1984
LOW HIGH
(jiJ
I IIJ
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alaska
Susitn:~study Are.'a
Area One
Are.'a Two
Are~Three
Are.3 Foul'
Area Five
Are~Sil-:
Are~Seven
Are.'a Eight
Area Nine
Area Ten
Are~Eleven
Area Twelve
Area Thirteen
Are::!Fourteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area
Ken~i Peninsula
Copper R./Wr~ngell/Valdez
Southeast Alaska
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
EVER
LOW HIGH
37.G7.41.31.
37.37.41.57.
20.G7.24.27.
1.G7.2.87.
4.37.6.1i.
1.2i.2.47.
0.17.0.57.
2.17.3.5;~
1.li.2.17.
o.7i~1.5%
.07.0.2i.
o.8i.1.8i.
.07.0.27.
.ox O.2k
0.1i.o.n
3.27.4.87.
0.77.1.57.
0.71.1.77.
0.7:);1.57.
7.47.9.87.
1.07.2.07.
0.37.0.97.
13.17.IG.lk
0.17.0.5%
B-ll2
35.31.
35.27.
19.Gi.
1.57.
4.14
1.2%
0.17.
2.0~
LOX
O.G7.
.07.
0.7%
.07.
0.17.
2.97.
0.77.
0./%
0.57.
7.07.
0.77.
0.37.
12.3%
.07.
39.57.
39.27.
23.Oi~
3.7k
5.'37.
01157-
3.4;~
2.01.
1.4%
1.7i.
0.21.
0.27.
O.5i.
4.5%
1.5;~
1.5%
1.37.
9.47-
1.7k
0.97.
15.37.
0.4%
27.9~
27.9k
15.6i;
1.2;~
0.91.
0.17.
1.57.
O.7Z
0.37.
.07.
0.67.
0.07.
O.O;~
.07.
2.57.
O.5i.
'1 C'II'\,•,hi.
O '~'i•.,;)Ia
5.37.
0.67.
0.27.
9.97.
.07.
31.7%
31.7~~
18.8i.
4.71.
1.g:,
O.5i.
,t""
J.II .J/~
1.1;~
0.2i.
1.4%
O.O;~
0.47.
4.17.
1.37.
1.37.
1.17.
8.07.
1.4X
0.87.
12.57.
11 ')'/v...."
Table B.lOO.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Grayling Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInorOytofAl~sk~39960 44370 37550 41900 29590 33710InAl.3ska 39650 44050 37340 41690 29590 33710Sysitn.3 StlJdy Are.3 21920 25670 20780 24470 16570 19970AreaOne168030001580288012202390Are.3 Two 4520 6520 4330 6290 3270 5010AreaThree1310251012202390%0 2020Are.3 tour 70 560 70 560 70 560AreaFive223037202140360015802880Are·3 Si:{1130 2260 1050 2140 700 1640AreaSeven700164061015103701120Are~Eight 0 250 0 250 0 250AreaNine870189078017606101510
Are~Eleven 0 250 0 250 0 0
Are~Twelve 140 710 70 560 10 410Are.3 Thirteen 3370 5130 3080 4780 2700 4310Are~FOlJrteen 700 1640 700 1640 530 138010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy780176070016405301380
Anchor~ge/ChIJ9~ch Mtn.Area 700 1640 530 1380 370 1120KenaiPeninsy1a7870104007470994061908470CopperR./Wrangell/Valdez 1050 2140 __-110 ___J.760 _______~~___t5tO __
"~..--_._--~--_.....•..,_..~~.-.._._._._-~_....---_..--~---SoiJiheasf-tH"asKa---------------29(f 980 290 980 210 850Elsewhe-rrtriAlas!t:.3 139Z0-r7ro-O 13100 Hi210 10480 13320OIJtsideAlaska70560104100250
),
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
,I
1
I I
.j
I
I
I
1
t
1
[
I]
Table B.10l.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Grayling Fishing by Area
[I
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONII EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 43.04 47.41.40.3i.44.7i.34.3i.38.5~
In Alaska 43.0%47.47-40.3%44.77-34.4;~38.6;~
Susitn::1 Study Are.3 28.2%32.21.26.41.30.4;~'1'1 ryat 26.5:Mw.,I.
Area One 1.27-2.47-1.11."".,1.01.:2.0%~.~/.
Area Two 5.57-7.77-5.2%7.47-4.9i.6.91.
Area Three 3.D:4.n:2.77-4.31.:2.27-3.6;~
Area tour·0.37-0.91.0.27-0.81.o 'i"0.81.
11
awl.
Area Five 3.7i.5.57-3.37-5.1;~2.8;'4.47-
Area Si:-:2.2%3.61.2.07-3.4i.lo61.'-1 nil!
4.0/.
Area Seven 1.07-2.07-1.0i.2.07-0.8i.1.8i:
Area Eight 0.1%0.5%O.li-0.5%0.17.0.57-
Area Nine 1.01.:2.07-0.97-1.91.0.7%l.i;!
Are.3 Ten .Oi.0.27-.0%0.21..01.0.27-
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07-0.07-0.01.0.07.0.0r.
Area Twelve .01.0.41..07-0.4i..01.0.21.
Area Thirteen 3.1i.4.77-3.0;'4.6i.2.61.4.2:~
Area tour teen 1.2%2.4%1.11.2.37-0.97-1.97-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.2%0.87.0.17-o 118'0.1i.0.57../1.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.2%0.87-0.27-0.87-0.2i.0.81.
f{enai PeninslJ1a 2.47-4.0%'1 ,,'"3.91.1.9;!3.3%....J:fit
Copper R./Wrangel1/Va1dez 2.77.4.37-2.57-4.n 2.07-3.4%
Southeast Alaska .07.0.4%.01.0.2%.0%O.2i~
Elsewhere in Alaska 12.1%15.1%11.47-14.47-9.3%12.li.
Outside Al.3ska .07.0.21..01.0.2%.0;'0.27.
II1...._
B-114
Table B.102.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Grayling Fish~ng by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~5970 6580 5600 6200 4760 5340InAlaska597065805600620047705360SusitnaStudyArea391044703670422031503680AreaOne170330160310130280Are.:!Two 760 1070 730 1020 680 %0Areal'hree 420 660 370 600 300 500Are:a tOIJr 40 130 30 110 30 110AreaFive510770460710390610Are:'3 Six 300 500 280 470 220 390AreaSeven130280130280110250Are.:!Eight 10 70 10 70 10 70AreaNine130280J20~__'.2Z~.._~_...~_10.0._.2aO_...·~~-Are.aIen--~·····--0 30 0 30 0 30AreaEleven000000AreaTwelve050050030AreaThirteen420660410640360580Are.:!Fourteen 170 330 160 310 120 27010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy3011020901070Anchorage/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 30 110 30 110 30 noKenaiPeninsula340550320540260460--~._--Cop per~-R.lWI'.:!nge ll/V ·:!ldez-370 600·-_._-_.~_._._-----··350·~·-~570····~~···---·280-···--470-~·~~
Elsewhere in A1~ska 1680 2100 1590 1990 1300 1670OutsideAlaska030030030
I ),
I I
)
I I
j
I
I
j
I
I
1
I I
1
]
I
I
I
l:
I
I
f1 Table B.103., I
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
[
of Rural Households Grayling Fishing by Area
[r
r I
II RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
i I GEOGRAPHIC ~OCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
[I In or out of Al~sk~58.9%65.3i.54.6i.61.27-44.97.51.5%
In Alask~58.97.65.3%54.8%61.47-45.2%51.8:'
Susitna Study Are~44.7%51.3i.40.87-47.47-36.2i~42.6Z
I J
Area One 4.47-7.67.3.57.6.3i.3.5:1.6.37.
Are.'3 Two 12.3i.16.97.11.6i.16.2i:10.4i.14.8%
Area Three 3.8i.6.8i.3.37.6.17.3.1%S,':Ji:
11
Are.'3 FQIJr .07.1.07..Oi.1.0i.0.07.O.7~
Area Five 2117%5.3i.'1 ""1 r:'Jil ":j'l 4.7i."'a /I,J.,.,J.~•.J/.
Are.'3 Six 2.1i.4.5i.2.0i.4.41.',~:3.6%1..0/.
Area Seven 0.6%.,")'1 0.6i.l')l")1JI 0.37.1 r:'/""....,.41.,;.,1.J.•••Ji.
Are·3 Eight 0.07.0.3i.0.0i.0.3%0.07-o "'.j•.J1I
Area Nine 1.07-2.8i.0.31.1.77.0.27.1.47.
Are~Ten 0.01.0.3i.O.OZ 0.37.0.07.0.0i.
IJ Are~Eleven 0.0%0.3%O.OZ 0.37.0.07.0.37.
Are·3 Twelve 0.1i.1.1i.0.1i.1.Ii..Oi.1.07.
Area Thirteen 5.47.8.87.5.Ii::8.5Z 4.5%"..,.,
!.11.
Are-3 Fourteen 2.07.4.2i.1.97.4.1%1.6i.3.87.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.77.2.37.0.77.2.37.0.67.2.27.
Anchor~ge/Chu'3ach Mtn.Are~0.37.1.5i.0.37.1.57.0.37.1.5i.
f(enai Peninsula 1.47.3.4i.1.37.3.3~~0.97.'1 '1"/...•1,.
Copper R./Wr~ngell/Valdez 3.67-6.4i.3.4i.6.2i::2.4Z 4.8i.
Southeast Al~sk~0.07.0.57.0.0i.0.5A:0.07.0.37.
Elsewhere in Al~ska 14.li.18.97.12.47.17.0i.8.1i.12.1i.
OIJtside Alaska 0.07.O.Ox 0.07.0.07.O.Oi:0.07.
IJ
IJ
IJ
B-1l6
I )
I
I
\ I
I
I
~I
--'
I
)
I
I
I
]
I
I
I
I,
'I
B-117
Table B.104.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Grayling Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~1570 1740 1450 1630 1190 1370InAlaska157017401460163012001380Susitn~Study Area 1190 1360 1090 1260 960 1130Are.:!One 120 200 90 170 90 170Are.:!Two 330 450 310 430 280 390AreaThree1001809016080160Are·3 FOIJf 0 30 0 ')(\0 20....v
Area Five 70 140 70 140 60 130Are.:!Si>:60 120 50 120 40 10C'Area Seven 20 60 20 60 10 40
Are~fuht_
Area Nine 30 70 10 40 10 40Are.3 Ten 0 10 0 10 0 0
Area Eleven 0 10 0 10 0 10Are.:!Twelve 0 30 0 30 0 30AreaThirteen140230140220120200Are.:!Fourteen 50 110 50 110 40 10010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy206020602060
Anchor~ge/Chu9ach Mtn.Are.3 10 40 10 40 10 40--·----------------Kenai-PeninslJla-·....--------------·-40---·--···----90------·····----·---30-----·9-(;--------.-------2ir-----rO---
Gopper-R.fW~:!nget}/Vatdez 90-~170 90-~170 lio--no
Southeast Alaska 0 10 0 10 0 10ElsewhereinAl.3sk.:!370 500 330 450 220 320OutsideAhsk.:!0 0 0 0 0 0
Table B.IOS.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
'-I
\
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
I
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Al-3sk-3 12.5i.14.31.11.5i.13.37-8.91.10.57.
In Alaska 12.57-14.3Z l1.5i.13.3i.13.01:10.6;'
Susitna Study Area 5.77.7.U c ""6.6i.4.0i-C'°1"1.J.,;,/..J.i.JJI
Area One 0.37-0.77-0.27-0.67-0.2%0.6i.
Are-3 Two o.n 1.37-0.67.'')"O.5;{0.9i..L .w/~
Are-3 Three 0.37-0.77-0.37-O.7~0.1i-0.5Y.
Area tour-.o~0.2%•Oi~O.2~.07-o -1'/IU/=
Area Five 1.4i.2.2i:1.37-1.97-O.'37-1.5j~
Are-3 Si:-:0.11.0.51.0.17.O.Si-0.1i.O.5i.
Area Seven 0.17.0.37-o.n 0.37-O.lX o ')'1•\J/.
Are-3 Eight 0.01.0.01.0.0i.0.01.,0.0r.0.0r.
Are:;i Nine 0.17.0.37.o.li.0.37-.O;~O.2i~
Area len 0.0i.0.0i.0.01.0.01.0.01.0.0i.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07-O.O;~0.0%0.0i:0.0i.
Are-3 Twelve 0.0i.0.0%0.01.0.0i.0.01.-0•.0i.
Area Thirteen 0.67.1.0i.0.67-1.0i.O.4;~O.8;~
Area Fourteen 0.31.o.n 0.37.o.n O.2Z 0.6%
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .07.0.2:\:aO?0.2i..07-O.2i~
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area O.li.o r:.,O.li.0.5i.0.11.O.3Z.,J1o
f(enai PeninslJla 2.3i.3.1i:2.1;~2.9i~1.74 '1 C'·I",.~l.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.4i.0.81.0.41.0.81.0.:31.0.77.
Southeast Alaska O.li.O.5i:0.17-0.5%O.li.0.3%
Elsewhere in Alaska 3.67-4.6i:3.5%4.57.2.77-3.n
Outside Alaska 0.1%0.57-0.17.0.37-o.li~0.37.
B-118
I )
Table B.I06.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
I I
\
i Jt
ALL HOUSEHOLDS (t
rGEOGRAPHICLOCATIONEVER1980-1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH t~lInoroutofAl~sk~15290 17610 14100 16340 10900 12910InA1.:lska 15290 17610 14100 16340 uno 13040Susitn~Study Area 7020 8690 6440 8040 4930 6360
IAre.;i One 370 850 280 710 280 710Are.:i Two 890 1570 780 1430 580 1140
.,
I
Area Three 370 850 370 850 180 550AreatOIJr202302023020"l':l"
\
<...,vAreaFive176026601540239011001840Are.:i Si>:180 550 180 550 180 550AreaSeven904009040090400 'IAre~Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~Area Nine 90 400 90 400 20 230..-------A1'ea-Ten~..-._._~_.._...-.-_.__.------·-0--··-···--0----0 ...-----0-.._---_._~_..•.-.--o-~---0
!~Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.:i Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen680128068012804701000AreaFOIJrteen370850370850280710 l10MilesNorthatDenaliHwy202302023020230
:"Anchor~ge/Chugach Mtn.Are.:i 180 550 180 550 90 400f{en.:ii Peninsul.:i 2760 3860 2540 3600 2090 3060
t
Copper R~/Wrangel1/Valdez 470 1000 470 1000 370 8.:5_0.---------------------Solitlleasf-A:lash .,,------..'·----1'80·---180 90
3330 4530OutsideAlaska1805509040090400 I
':I
/1
,)
I
Table B.107.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HI!JH LOW HIf.iH
In or out of Al."3sk."3 11.47.14.27-10.47.13.2i.8.0i.10.47.
In Al.3ska 11.3;~14.Ii.10.4i.13.27.8.07.10.4::
Susitna Study Are~4.67.6.6i.4.21.G.Oi.I)1:,1/4.81.WI"'/'
Area One 0.2%0.8i.o.li.O.7k O.l:~o 1"1'/.11a
Area Two 0.51.1.3i.O.4i~1 ..,.,or..!l.l;~•';'is ,.;;/.
Area Three 0.2%0.8i.0.17.O.7~o.n 0.57.
Are~tOIJr 0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07.0.01.
Area Five 0.97.1.9%o.n 1.5Z O.4X 1.2i~
Area Sil-:.07.0.47-.07.0.47..Oi.0.41.
Area Seven .O;!0.47..0;'0.4;~0'1 o.2i~•no
Are;~Ei'3ht 0.07.0.07-0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0%
Area Nine .O~~0.47-.0%0.47.•Or.0.27-
Are::!Ten 0.0i.0.0i.0.0%0.07.0.07-0.01.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.0%0.07-0.0i.0.0;:
Are=:!Twelve 0.07-0.0%0.0%0.07.0.07.0.01.
Area thirteen 0.3%1.17.0.37.l.li.o 'l'!0.9i..,,""
Are=:!Fourteen 0.2i.0.87.0.2i.0.8i.0.1i.0.5%
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .07.0.27..07.o .,.!.01.o.2;!awl.
Anchora'3e/Chu9=:!ch Mtn.Are=:!0.17.0.57.0.17.0.57..OY.0.4%
Ken=:!i Peninsula 2.37.3.77.2.07.3.47.1.7%2.9i~
Copper R./Wr=:!n'3e1l/Valdez 0.1i.o.n O.li.0.7i.O.lI.O.5i~
Southeast Al=:!ska O.li.O.n:O.li.o '1'!.07.0.4i..1 ""
Elsewhere in Alaska 3.3i.4.9i.3.1i.4.77.2.57-3.9%
Outside Alaska 0.1I O.Si.0.17.0.57."I!0.4/:.",,"
B-120
TableB.108.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area -\
,.f
II
t
I
I-,I;
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGH " I{jInoroutofAl~sk~12090 15100 11080 13990 8470 11070InAl~sk.3 11990 14990 11080 13990 8470 11070Susitn~Study Are~4910 6980 4430 6410 3370 5130 ,
IAreaOne210850140710140710i,/Are.:!Two 530 1380 450 1250 370 1120AreaThree21085014071070560
4
Are.:!Four 0 0 0 0 0 0Are~Five 960 2020 700 1640 450 1250AreaSb:10 410 10 410 10 410
f
Area Seven 10 410 10 410 0 250Are.:!Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine1041010410
0 0 (Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0Are~Twelve 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen11203701120290980 ,Are.:!FOIJrteen 850 210 850 70 560 \10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 250 0 250 0 250Anchor·:!ge/Chug.:!ch 1'Itn.Are.3 560 70 560 10 410f(en.3i Peninsula 3950 2140 3600 1770 3120 ICopperR./Wr.:!ngell/V.'31dez_~.7..10 140--~no 70--SIJO------------------Soiitheast Alaska
3270 5010 2610 4190OutsideAlaska707056010410
!\
,\
!
)
I
Table B.I09.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~14.3i.17.5i.13.17.16.9i.10.87.13.6i.
In Alask~14.37.17.57.13.77.16.9i.10.8i.13.GX
Susitn~Study Area 8.17.11.37.8.4i.11.Oi.6.41.8.8i.
Area One 0.17.0.57..07.0.4i.0'/0.47-...
Are~Two 0.8i.l.Si.0.8i.1.87-0.61.1.6i:
Area Three 0.37-0.97.0.37.0.9i.0.1%o ..,.,
u {i•
Area FOIJr .01.0.21.•Oi.0.2i..Oi.O,2~
Area Five 3.17.4.91.3.17-4.77.2.0i.3114:t
Area Sil-:0.6i.1.41.0.67.1.47-0.57.1.37.
Area Seven 0.27.0.87.0.2,0.87.0.1:"0.5/:
Are'3 Eight .Oi.0.2:'.Oi.0.27..07.0.2:;:
Area Nine .Oi.0.27..07.,0.2%.07-O.2i~
Area Ten .07-0.27..Oi.O.2i..Oi.o 'j'!....1.
Area Eleven 0.0r.0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.07.
Are~Twelve 0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.0i-0.07.
Area Thirteen 0.67.1.67.0.67-1.6;!0.67-1.47.
Area Fourteen 0.37.0.97.0.37.o l1'!0.27.0.81.•.n.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy .07.0.27..07.0.27-.0%0.2:'
Anchor~se/Chus~ch Mtn.Area .07.0.4i..Oi.0.47..07.0.47.
f{enai PeninslJla 0.67.1.67.0.6i.1.67.0.57.1.37.
Copper R./Wransell/Valdez 1.37.2.5r.1.3i.2.5%l.0i.2.0i.
Southeast Alaska .Oi.0.27..07.0.2i..07.0.27.
Elsewhere in Al~ska 3.47.5.27-3.li:.4.97.2.47.4.0i.
Outside Al.:lska •Or.0.27..07.0.2i..Oi.0.27.
B-122
Table B.llO.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
,IGEOGRAPHICLOCATIONEVER1980-1985 1984 (\LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~1980 2430 1900 2340 1490 1390
'IInAl.3sk.3 1980 2430 1900 2340 1490 1890 ISusitn~Study Are~1210 1570 1170 1530 890 1220 I,,IAre~One 10 70 0 50 0 50Are~Two 110 250 110 250 90 220
\
Are~Three 40 130 40 130 20 90Are.3 FOIJr 0 30 0 30 0 30AreaFive440570420660280470 (Are~Six 80 200 BO 200 70 180AreaSeven30110301101070Are~Eight
0 30 0 30 0 30AreaTen030030030AreaEleven000000Are~Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~,
)Area Thirteen 90 220 90 220 BO 200 \Are.:!Fourteen 40 130 40 130 30 no10MilesNorthofDenaliHwy030030030Anchor~ge/Chu9~ch Mtn.Are~.0 50 0 50 0......jQ,...f(enai··PeninsIJ1.3 90 220''-."'·"'90 '220 ---_.,.._-_..-.....•.._-_......
70 180
."-.-..",--....----_...-•....._"..".-
C.opper-R.LWr.::lngell.LV.'31dez 180--350 180--350 130 280SoutheastAlaska030030030 rElsewhereinAlask~470 720 440 670 340 550 ,IOutsideAlaska()30 0 30 0 30
1 (
I
Table B.lli.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
20.61.26.2i.
I
,j
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of AlasK4
In AlasK4
Susitn4 Study Are4
Area One
Area Two
Area Three
Area Four
Area five
Area Si:{
Area Seven
Area Eight
Area Nine
Area Ten
Area Eleven
Are.'3 Twelve
Area Thirteen
Are.'3 Fourteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are4
f{enai Peninsula
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez
Southeast AlasKa
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
EVER
LOW HIGH
22.17.27.7i.
22.6;~28.47.
l6.8i.22.01.
0.87.2.61.
2.0i.4.2%
0.67.2.27.
O.Oi~0.0i.
6.47.10.01.
0.37.1.71.
0.17.1.17.
0.07.0.07.
.07.0.81.
0.07.0.0i.
0.07.0.3%
0.07.0.07.
o.n 2.37-
O.li.1.17.
0.3%1.5i.:
0.07.0.07.
0.3%l.n
0.7%2.31.
0.01.0.51.
3.4%6.21.
0.07.0.07.
B-124
21.2k
l5.7i.
0.3;~
1.71.
0.57.
0.01.
5.97.
O -,,"\11
•.J/.
o•Ii.
0.07.
.07.
0.07.
0.07.
0.01.
o.n
0.11.
0.31.
O.Oi:
0.37.
0.67.
0.0i.
0.0i.
26.87.
20.7~
2.6%
3.91.
1.9%
0.0i.
'3.57-
1.51.
l.n
0.0i.
0.87-
0.0i.
0.37.
0.07.
2.3%
1.17-
1.57.
0.01.
1.7%
2.01.
0.57.
6.0i-
0.07.
1'384
LOW HIGH
15.07.20.01.
15.41.20.4i~
12.61.17.47.
0.7;'2.3;~
1.27.3.2;!
0.41.1.8i.
4.6i~7 .8~
o.3k 1.5;~
O.3Z 1.51.
O.l;~1.i':
O.Oi.0.07.
•O~O.3i~
0.0i.0.01.
O.Oi~0.37.
0.0%0.0%
0.3%11l7;~
.01.1.0%
0.07.0.0i:
().27.1.27.
O.3i.1.7%
1.4%:3.47.
0.07.0.0i.
Table B.112.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Burbot or Cod Fishing by Area
t
,).
.1
10
o
40
30
40
o
30
o
o
10
o
10
o
o
1984
LOW HIGH
·400 530
410 540
340 460
20 60
30 80
10 50
120 210
10 40
10 40
o 30
o 0
o 20
10
o
60
30
40
o
40
o
o
20
o
10
o
10
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
550 700
560 710
420 550
20 70
50 100
10 50
o 0
160 250
10 40
o 30
o 0
o 20
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER
LOW HIGH
590 740
600 750
450 590
20 70
50 no
20 60
o 0
170 270
10 40
o 30
o 0
o 20
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of A1~sk~
In Al~sk~
Susitn~Study Are~
Area One
Are.3 'fwo
Area Three
Area Four
Area Five
Are.3 Sb:
Are.3 Seven
Are.3 Eisht
Are.3 Nine
Area Eleven 0 10
Area Twelve 0 0
Area Thirteen 20 60
Area Fourteen 0 30
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 10 40
Anchorage/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 0 0
Kenai Peninsula 10 40
Copper R./Wrangell/V~ldez 20 60
---------------SoUtile~rAlisY..a------------10 0 10 0 l.9
------E-lseRher-e-tn-AtasY..-a----------r190--r7b:---------::9,.;-0--::-:16:-:-0-----:4~0-~90
Outside Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0
I{
1,I
Table B.1l3.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
.GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 198;
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1~sk~31.67-34.2Z 29.5%32.1i.25.57.27.'3i.
In Alaska 30.7%33.37-29.0i.31.67-'11:''"l'{27.b;!~nJ.wn
SIJsi tn:a St'Jdy Are::!15.97.17.97.14.8i.16.8~12.7X 14.5~
Area One 0.87-1.4i.0.67.1.2;~0.6i.1 ';'/ai.Aia
Area Two 4.37-5.5Z '1.0i.co '1"!-:''=.'1 ~CII.J.Y/,."J,·.JI.'I.,.)!.
Area Three 2.47-3.47.2.3i~3.3i.1.9~.,ryll
"'a!ia
Are.:!FOIJr 0.07.0.07.0.0i.O.O~0.0i.0.07.
Area Five 0.87-1.4i.0.6i.1.27.O.6~1.01.
Area Sil-:0.71.1.37-O.6i~1.27-0.6i.LOA::
Area Seven 0.37.0.7%0.27-0.6i.0.2i.o116i~
Are.:!Eight 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.07-0.0%
Area Nine 0.37-O.7~'0.37.0.77.0.27-0.61.
Are.:!Ten .07.0.27.0.07.0.07.0.07-0.07.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.0i.O.OZ 0.0;'0.07-
Are.:!Twelve .0%0.27..Oi:0.27..Oi.0.2i.
Area Thirteen 1.97.2.n 1.9i.rt ~.,1.6i.2.4%':../1.
Area Fourteen 1.57-2.3i.1.5i..-,".,'1.27-1.87....~l.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.67.1.27.0.67.1.0i.0.57.0.97.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are:3 ·5.3k 6.n 5.1i.6.37-4 ""J I:"MI.
.,.)10 .J./I~
Kenai Peninsula 3.87.5.07-3.Gi:4.67-3.27.4 '1'{•i"la
Copper R./Wrangell/Va1dez 0.67.1.27.0.6i.1.27.0.67-1.0i.
Southeast Alaska 0.37.0.7%0.27.0.6;!0.1i.0.5i.
Elsewhere in Alaska 7.6i.·9.27.7.27-8.87.6.17.7.5i.
Outside Ahska 0.77.1.3i.0.57.0.97-0.3i.O.7;~
--_..j
B-l26
Table B.114.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlask~38790 41980 36240 39380 31270 34280InAlask.:!37700 40870 35630 38760 30910 33900SusitnaStUdyArea194702202018160206301553017860Are.:!One 1000 1700 780 1430 780 1430Are.:!Two 52S0 6750 4930 6360 4240 5580Are.:!Three 2990 4130 2880 4000 2310 3330Are.3 tOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaFive1000170078014306801280Are.:!Si:<890 1570 780 1430 680 1280AreaSeven370850230710280710Are.3 Eight 0 0 0
370 850 280 710Are.:!Ten 20 230 0 0 0 0AreaEleven000000Are.:!Twelve 20 230 20 230 20 230AreaThirteen231033302310333019802930Are~Fourteen 1870 2800 1870 2800 1430 225010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy780143068012805801140Anchorage/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 6560 8170 6210 7780 5510 7010.....~~enat.f.~niD~l,l1,3."._-"._-_.-.---.._--~-----...·..--4700--6100---....-4360-'5710-'-·'·-'-3900··--SrBO--.,-_._..-_._.~.._~"-_._..~
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez Z8.o__L430 780--1-4BO 680--1280SoutheastAlaska370850280710180550ElsewhereinAlaska93701125089001074074909200OutsideAlaska89015705801140370850
'.~
I
J
I
I}
,'I
I
I
)
Table B.1l5.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Using Summer Off-Road
Vehicles by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 30.4Z 34.4~28.37-32.1!24.11.27.9i~
In Alaska 29.47-33.47.27.7%31.5;~23.81.27 .4;~
Susitna Study Are~14.17-17.n 13.0Z 16.07-10.97-13.7;(
Area One O.7i~1.5%0.57.1.3k O.4X 1 ry~1.w'"
Are~Two 3.57.5.37-3.3i.5.1i.2.9i.4.57.
Are·3 Three 1.87.3.2k 1.7%2.9i~1.2k 2.4Z
Are·3 FOIJr 0.0i.0.0i.0.0r.0.01.0.07.0.0%
Are·3 Five o.n 1.5%o "'f 1.3;~0.4?1.27-...1",
Are.3 Sb:0.47.1.2Z 0.3%l.1i.0.3i.1.1i.
Area Seven O.I;~0.77.O.li~0.77.O.lk 0.5?
Area Eight O.O?0.0i.0.07.0.01.O.Oi~0.0%
Area Nine 0.2%0.8X o .,./0.87-0.17.0.7;'.,;,/-
Area Ten .07-0.27.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.0%
Area Eleven 0.07-O.O?0.0%0.07-0.07.{\/'"'J.'J,.
Are·3 Twelve .OZ 0.2Z .0%0.27-.O;{0.21.
Area Thirteen 1.6~2.BZ 1.67.2.8Z 1.47..'1 '0 I'",.0'1
Are·3 fOIJrteen 1.2%2.4i.1.2%2.27-0.87-1.8%
10 Miles North of Denali'Hwy 0.5Z 1.37.0.4/.1.2%0.31.l.li.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 5.6i.7.87.5.41.7.4%4.81.G.87.
f(enai Penins lJl.3 3.97.r:"''1 3.67.5.47-3.37-4.9i.,JII i ,.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.37.0.91.0.31.0.91.O.2~O.8;~
Southeast Alaska 0.37-0.97-0.1%0.77.0.1%0.71.
Elsewhere in Alaska 7.1X 9.51.6.9%9.11.5.67.7.87.
Outside Alaska 0.71.1.71.0.47-1.27.0.27-O.Bi~
B-128
Table B.1l6.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
B-l29
)
I
,I
!I
1
1
)
.)
1984
LOW HmH
I 12564029590
25230 29160
115',O 14540 1(
450 1250 . I:3080 4780
1310 2510
i')0 0
450 1250
370 1120
70 560 I00
140 710
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
30010 34140
29380 33490
13820 16990
530 1380
3560 5360
1770 3120
o 0
530 1380
370 1120
140 710
o 0
210 850
EVER
LOW HIGH
32310 36520
31260 35440
14940 18200
700 1640
3750 5600
1950 3360
o 0
700 1640
450 1250
140 710
o 0
210 850
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~ska
In Alaska
Susitn~Study Area
Area One
Are:;i Two
Are.3 Ihree
Are::!tOIJr
Area five
Are.'3 Si:<
Area Seven
Are.'3 Eight
Area Nine
AI'ea.len-~
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 250 0 250 0 250
Are.3 Thirteen 1680 3000 1680 3000 1490 2750
Area Fourteen 1310 2510 1220 2390 870 1890
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 530 1380 450 1250 370 1120
Anchorage/Chugach litn.Area 5990 8240 5700 7900 5110 7210
Ken.3i Peninsula 4140 6060 3850 5710 3460 5250
Copper R./WrangeU/Valdez 290 980 __._.2_9_0..._1?.Q.~_._."21..Q.850_.····-.._··-..Soljtl1easCA1.3ska .'--'290'-980'''-'140 710 140 710
------nsewl'iere inA1asK~.'3---7570-..rO·O·6:.;0----..72;.8~0----;:;9.;;:7:::~.·0------;5:.::9:;;-90;--:;'.82:-:4-:-0------
Outside Alask.3 780 1760 450 1250 210 850
Table B.1l7.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Using Summer Off-Road
Vehicles by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
\GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
i LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~33.47.37.6i.32.27.36.47.28.6;·~32.67.
In Alaska 33.47.37.61.'")'i 'i'/36.47.28.7%./"j'l F)I'""w ..wn \oJ,w1 i il
Susitna Study Area 22.0i.25.8i.21.3i.25.17.19.2~1').,0 1';'WI'.•U.
Area One 0.37-1.17.o .")~!1.n o '")'/1D li~••.•hll 11'-'/0
Area Two 6.37.o r:'I 6.0i.8.2~5.37-7.57.lJ .;,Ji.
Area Three 5.0%7.27-4.97-6.'3i:4.57-6.5;~
Are.:!fOIJr 0.0i.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0i.O.O;~
Area five 0.5i.1.37.0.47.1.2;''0.3%0.91.
Are.:!Sb:1.17.2.37-1.17."l "l'l 1.0i:2.0i.a:;.•.J/.
Area Seven 0.3i.0.9r.0.37.O.9k O.2k o.8i~
Area Eight .Or.0.4i..OY.0.47.{'j'l 0.4;~.\U.
Area Nine 0.2%O.8i~0.27-0.8r.0.27.O.8i~
Are.:!Ten 0.07.0.07.0.07.-0.07.0.07.0.07.
Are·:!Eleven 0.0%0.07.0.0r.0.07.0.07.0.01.
Are.:!Twei ve .07.0.47..07-0.4i..O~0.4i.
Area Thirteen 1.8i.3.27.1.8%3'112%1.61::2.a;~
Area fourteen 2.0i:3.4i.1.97.3.37.1.87.-j.'1 a!v.wi.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy O.2i.0.8i.0112%0.8%15.3Z 19.21.
Anchor~ge/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 0.77-1.77-0.67.1.6%0.6i.1.67.
~(enai Peninsula 1.2~2.47.1.07-2.0i.0.91.1 tW'J"
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 2.5%4.1%2.4i.4.0i.1.~)i..j Ii.,
..:;.oJ/.
Southeast Alaska .07.0.2%.07-0.2%.07.o '1'/•.wi_
Elsewhere in Alaska 7.47.9.87.7.17-9.5i.6.37.o ,.,-/
•..1 I i I•
OIJtside Alaska •0%0.2%.Oi.0.2%.07.1'1 ")DlV.wi.
B-130
Table B.1l8.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Using Summer Off-Road
Vehicles by Area
}
I
)
..~
/:
1984
LOW HIGH I39704530
3980 4540
2670 3160 'J50150
740 1040
620 900
0 0 I40130
130 280
30 110
i050
30 110
0 0 l050
220 390
250 440 122002660
90 220
120 2~JO !..._26L__._~~---------_..-
0 30
880 1200 ,'I030
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
4640 5220 4470 5050
4640 5220 4470 5050
3060 3580 2960 3480
50 150 50 150
870 1190 830 1140
700 990 GaO %0
0 0 0 0
70 130 60 170
160 310 160 310
40 130 40 130
0 50 0 50
30 110 30 110
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Alaska
In Alaska
Susitna Study Are~
Area One
Are::lTwo
Area Three
Area fOIJr
Area Five
Are.3 Sb:
Area Seven
Are.3 Bight
Are.3 Nine
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 50 0 50
Area Thirteen 250 440 250 440
Are.3 fOIJrteen 280 470 260 460
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 30 110 30 110
Anchor.3ge/Ch IJg.3Ch Mtn.Are~100 230 '30 220
f{enai Peninsula 170 330 130 280
Copper R.IWr.3l"1ge l1/Valdez 350 570 340 550
····-····-·-·----.-·.-.~-Southeast-At3ska----..-··-·---·--'---0"-'-"····--30..·_..·"""'''0'-----30
------E-lsewhere-in--A-hska 1020--13f10'-----98o-r32-0·----~----:;-~-----
Outside Alaska 0 30 0 30
1.1
B-131
1
I
Table B.1l9.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage of
Rural Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
I I GEOGRAPHIC LOCAIION EVER 1980 -1985 1984"
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH l.OW HmH
In or Q~t of A13ska 36.07-42.47.34.47-40.87.31.27-~37 .47-
In Alaska 35.87.42.2%34.27-40.6i-31.17.37 .3;~
S~sitna St~dy Area 27.3i.t)4)lJ'IJ 26.7'1.'j,)'7'1 24.07.29.8i:vVgV/...;u".II.
Area One 1.87.4.07-1.7i.3.97-1.37.3.3k
Area Two 6.87-10.67-6.8i.10.4i.I:""1 1
'9.3%oj •.II.
Are3 Three 3.37-6.17.3.37-6.lk 3.0i.5.8i.
Area tour 0.07-0.0i.0.0i.0.07-0.0i.0.07.
Area five 1.2:i.3.07-l.li.2.9i.1.07.2.8k
Area Si:<1.37.3.3i.1.3i.3.3i.0.97-2.7%
Area Severt 0.3i.l.n 0.3i.1.5i~O.2;~1 ".,.~/.
Area Ei'jht 0.0i.0.5i.0.0i.0.57-O.O~O.5i.
Area Nine .0%0.8%.07.0.87-.O;~O.8i:
Are.'!Ien 0.07-0.0r.0.0r.0.07.O.Or.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07-0.07-0.07-0.07.0.07.
Area Iwelve 0.0%0.3i.0.07.0.37-0.07.0.3%
Area Thirteen 2.97-5.57-2a 9i~co CII 2.87-5.47-",.",10
Area POIJrteen 2.37.4.7'1.2.17.4.57-2.0~4.4t:
10 Miles North of Denalj Hwy 0.37-1.5;~0.3i.1.5%,."iii'1.5kl}.ili.
Anchor ''l'je/Chu'jach Mtn.Are3 0.67-2.2%0.6%').,..,0.67-"'1'1......1..;i..£j/l
Ken''li Penins~la 0.27-1.47-0.2i.1.4%0.2i.1.47.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.67.2.27-0.67.'1 '11'0.47-1.8i..:i."I.
So~theast Alaska 0.07-0.37-0.0%0.37-0.01.O.3k
Elsewhere in Alaska 6.5i.10.17-6.57.10.n 5.97.C\<:'1",•.JJ,
O~tside Alaska 0.0r.0.37-0.07.0.37-0.01.0.37.
B-132
1
1
)
\
I
}
(
)
.1
Table B.120.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of Rural
Households Using Summer Off-Road Vehicles by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1'384LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAl.3Sk:;J 960 1130 920 1090 830 1000InAlaska95011209101080830990SusitnaStudyArea730890710870640790Are.3 One 50 110 50 100 30 90Are.:!TWQ 180 280 180 2$0 160 250Are.3 Three 90 160 90 160 80 150Are.3 Four 0 0 0 0 0 0Areafive308030803070Are.3 Six 30 90 30 90 20 70AreaSeven10401040030AreaEight010010010AreaNine020020
0 0AreaEleven000000AreaTwelve010010010AreaThirteen801508015070140AreaFOIJrteenGO130GO1205012010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy104010401040Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are.:!20 GO 20 60 20 60KenaiPeninsula104010401040.~__CQIH!g,Ll._LWr.::!ngel1LVa1dez __..·-~--~-20--~-GO---..·..--.-----20--60--...~..~--~.-...._..-~..10~-----·--..·-·"50'--~--~.--_._.....•--_.._~..._---_._.----"--'-~--"----"---
170 270 170 270 160 250010010010
,\
\1
Table B.121.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~31.7%34.31.28.37.30.91.23.27-25 .6;~In A1ask.3 30.97.33.51.27.S~30.4i~23.2:'25.61.Susi tn~StlJdy Are.3 14.87.16.81.13.31.15.3X 11.n 12.9XAre.::!One 0.6i.1.21.0.6i.1.0i.0.61.1.07.Area Two 4.27.5.41.3.81.5.01..~'1'1 4.2Z·J."I.Are.::!Three 2.2%3.0%2.1%2.9i:1.bi.2.41.Are::.tour 0.07.0.01.0.0i.0.0%0.07.0.01.
Are.::!Five 0.97-1.57.0.67.1.07.0.57.a.9:'\:
Area Six 0.67.1.2~0.6i.1.07.O.5j~O.9;~
Area Seven 0.17.0.3%0.17-0.3%0.1:"0.37.
Area Eight 0.07.0.07.0.07-O.Oi~0.01.O.ai~
Are:a Nine 0.1i.0.51.0.17.:0.37.0.1%0.37.
Are:a Ten .01.0.2%0.07.0.01.O.Ok 0.01.
Are.::!Eleven 0.07-0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07-0.0r.
Are·3 Twe 1ve .07.0.2i.0.0%0.07.0.0%0.01.
Are.3 Thirteen 1.1%l.n:1.17.1.71.o.n 1.5i:Area tour teen 2.4%3.47.'1 '1'1 3.17.1.71."c:u.:.....".,;,..oJ/•
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.4%0.8%0.4%0.37-0.3%0.7%
Anchorage/Chu9ach Mtn.Area 6.01.7.47.5.17.6.3i.4.47.5.61.
Kenai Peninsul.3 2.3%3.1%2.1~2.9%1.67-2.4k
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.51.0.9%0.4i.0.87.0.37.0.71.
Southeast Alaska 0.27.0.67.0.11.0.57.0.1%0.57-
Elsewhere in Al.::!ska 9.3i.10.9i.8.6i.10.2i.6.n 3.17-
Outside Alaska 0.6i.1.07.0.3%0.7%O.IX 0.3%
B-134
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.122.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
E'JER 1980 -1985 1'384
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Al.3sk:~38910 42110 34780 37890 28490 31410
In Al.3ska 37940 41110 34180 37260 28490 31410
SU':ii tn.:!Study Are.3 18160 20630 16360 18740 13630 15830
Are.:!One 780 1430 680 1280 680 1280
Are.3 Iwo 5170 6620 4700 6100 3900 5180
Area Three 2650 3730 2540 3600 1980 '·'2930
Are.3 FOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area five HOO 1840 680 1280 580 1140
Area Si>:780 1430 680 1280 580 1140
Area Seven 90 400 90 400 90 400
Are;~Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Nine 180 550 90 400 90 400
Area ien .~..--.----.---.--20--230---··0·...·-O·----·O----~O-~--..--
Are.:!Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 iwelve 20 230 0 0 0 0
Area Thirteen 1320 2120 1320 2120 HOO 1840
Are.3 FOIJrteen 2990 4130 2760 3860 2090 3060
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 470 1000 470 1000 370 850
Anchor.3ge/Chug.3ch Mtn.Area 7380 9070 6210 7780 5400 6880
Kenai Peninsul.3 2760 3860 2540 3600 1980 2930
Copper R.lWr.3ngell1V.:!ldez 580 1140 .47L_~10~00~~37'__",O__.8.5.0 ...
---..-·--..----·-..-·---SoIJtl1easrAlask.a--·--------~--280---'--710 -180 550 180 550
-------EtsellheFe~irIAl.3sk"a II37o-r34Z0 10550 12530 8190 9970
QIJtside Alaska 680 1280 370 850 90 400
)
)
l
./
)
I
(
i)
J
\
I
)
I
l
(
j
1
I
'1
I
I \IJ
Table B.123.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Using Winter Off-Road
Vehicles by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 29.97.33.97.26.27.30.07-21.0i.24.67.
In Alaska 28.97,32.97.25.7i~29.57.20.97-".-\r:-.J..:.."t.,J,..
Susitna Study Area 12.47.15.4i.10.97-13.n 8.n 11.37-
Area One 0.47.1.2%0.47-1.27-0.4i.1 '1'/.~/.
Are:;;Two'3.37-4.97-./"'1 q-t 4.5i~2.37.3.77.WI ,,I,
Area Three 1.57.2.77.1.47.2.67.1.0i.2.0i~
Are:~Four 0.07-0.07-0.07.0.0i.0.07.O.O?
Area Five 0.67-1.47.0.3%1.1%0.2i.0.87-
Are::!Six 0.37.l.li::0.37-1.17.0.37-0.97.
Are.:!Seven .07.0.2:.07.o ')'/.O~0.2%aiA/.
Area Eight 0.01.0.0i.0.0r.0.0r.0.07-0.07.
Area Nine •Or.0.47-.07.0.47-.07.0.47.
Are::!Ten .Oi.0.27-0.0r.0.07.0.0i.O.O?
Area Eleven 0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07.0.07.OaOk
Are.":!Twelve .Oi.0.2i.0.07.0.01.0.0i.0.0%
Area Thirteen 0.87.1.87.0.7%1.7i~0.6%1.4;'
Are."3 Fourteen 2.1%3.5:!1.87.':)')./1.3i~2.5%...,....1.
10 Miles North of Den."31i Hwy 0.3%1.17.0.3i.0.97.o ?~I 0.8Y..~n
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 6.4i.8.6i.5.4%7.47.4.67-6.6i.
Kenai PeninslJl.3 2.37.3.7%2.1Z 3.5~'1.67.2.8Z
Copper R./Wrange11/Va1dez .Oi.0.41..07.0.4%.01.V.2X
Southeast Alaska 0.17.0.7i.0.1i.0.57.0.17.0.57.
Elsewhere in AlasK."3 8.97-11.57.8.27-10.67.6 ')'/8.4%.wn
Outside Alaska 0.5%1.37.OIl3~{0.9%0.17-0.5%
B-136
)
1
l
(
j
I
I
J
I
Table B.l24.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of Urban
Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~31780 35980 27820 31870 22330 26110InAlask.3 30740 34900 27300 31330 tl'Fl'1{\26000Y"-a,u,";'n,S~sitn~Study Area 13210 16320 11590 14540 9270 11970AreaOne450125045012504501250Are.'3 Two 3460 5250 3080 4780 2420 3950AreaIhree158028S01490275010502140Are.3 FOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaFive6101510370H2O210850AreaSi>:370 1120 370 1120 290 980Are~Seven 0 250 0 250 0 250Are.'3 Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine10410Iii410II)410"
------~--_._~._--
.__..____Ar_e,Llen __--_._-_._-_..•._-----_.._..•_....•_.-.--0 ····-250--··_·-0---·---0--·.·----0-----0·-
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.3 Twelve 0 I 250 0 0 0 C'870 I
1390 780 1510AreaThirteen1760610Are.'3 FOIJrteen 2230 3720 1950 3360 1400 263010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy3701120290980210850Anchor~gelChugach Mtn.Are~6780 9150 5700 7900 4910 6'380f(enai Peninsula 2420 3950 2230 3720 1680 3000CopperR./Wrangel1/Valdez 10
70 560 70 560Elsewhen-trllil~sKa 8670 11300 6580 8920OutsideAl.3ska 290 980 70 560
Table B.12S.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Using Winter Off-Road
Vehicles by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1 C)85 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alask·3 35.4i.39.67-34.07.38.2i.30.17.34.37-
In Alask.3 35.47.39.6i.34.0i.38.27-30.47-34.6i~
Susi toa Study Are.3 23.27.27.07-22.67.26.47.'l!\'1"1 23.87-..Va"'.
Area One 0.57-1.37.0.31.I.IX O.3;~o.':Ji~
Are.3 Two 7.17.9.5i-6.9i.9.3i.6.27-8.41.
Are.3 Three 4.87.6.S;!4.n 6.7;!4.2X ,..-.../o.~...
Area tour 0.07.0.07-0.07.0.01.0.01.0.0%
Area Five 1.01.2.0X 0.91.1.97.0.8i.1.8i.
Area Sb:1.47-2.6i.1.37-2.5%1.Ii.2.37-
Area Seven o ")./0.8:7.0.27-0.37.0.27.0.87..wn
Are.3 Ei'jht .07.0.47..OX 0.47-.O~0.47.
Area Nine 0.11.0.57-0.11.0.57.0.17.o <:./.'-'1.
Area Ien 0.01.0.07-0.07.O.O!0.07.0.07-
Area Eleven O.O?:0.07.0.0i.0.07.0.07-0.07.
Are.3 Twelve .07-0.27-.07.0.27-.07-r-'l"v•.::./.
Area Thirteen 1.47.2.6i.1.37-l')r:.,1.07-2.2;!.w.~{.
Area tOIJrteen 2.77.4.3k 2.67-4.27-'1 ~"I 4.07.....~/.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.27.0.3i.0.2%0.87.0.17-o ryl'Ill.~
Anchora'je/Chu'jach Mtn.Are.3 0.97.1.97-o"..1.87-0.6i.1.67..ot.
f{enai Peninsula 0.67.1.4i.0.41.1.21.0.37-1.1i.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez ~.n 4.37.2.7k 4.31.2.4i.4.07.
Southeast Alaska .07-0.27..07-0.2i..Oi.o r",.!aui_
Elsewhere in Alaska 8.0!10.6i.7.77.10.3i.6.87-9.27-
OIJtside Alaska .01.0.47.•Or.0.2%.OX O.2X
B-138
lSlB4
LOW HIGH
4180 4750
4220 4800
2800 3310
40 130
850 1170
590 860
0 0
110 250
160 310
30 110
10 70
0 0
0 0
0 30
150 300
340 550
20 90
J
I
I
J
I
.J
)
'~
340 550
o 30 I
940 1280 \
o 30
)
.J
I
I
I
I
)
...2L 22L ,...j
50 150
TableB.126.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Using Winter Off-Road
Vehicles by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION HVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~4910 5500 4720 5300InAl.3Sk.3 4910 5500 4720 5300Susitn~Study Area 3220 3750 3140 3660AreaOne7018050150Are.3 Two 980 1320 960 1290AreaThree660950650930Are.3 tOIJr 0 0 0 0AreaFive130280120270Are:~Si>:190 360 180 350AreaSeven3011030110Are.3 Eight
10 70 10 70Are.3 Ien 0 0 0 0AreaEleven0000Are·3 Twe lve 0 30 0 30AreaThirteen190360180350Are.3 Fourteen 370 600 360 58010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy3011030110Anchorage/Chug~ch Mtn.Area 120 270 110 250.---Kenai PeninsIJ1.3----.----·--·-80 ........200""""--.._------··..T70·--_.,"-,---_._._.~~-60Copper....R.I.Wr..30gellI-V.31dez 370--6'00 370--6'0'0SOIJtneastAlaska030030ElsewhereinAlaska1110147010701420OutsideAlaska0SO030
(\
11
Table B.127.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage of
Rural Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles by Area
)RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
)]GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~51.5k 58.1%50.n 57.3%45.(,i.52.2;~
In Alask~51.27-57.8i.50.3%5(,.97-45.7i~52.37-
SlJsitn.:!St'Jdy Are~41.8%48.4%39.41.4('.0i.36.3i:42.7%
Area One 2.1k 4.5k 2.n 4.5%2.1;~4.5;~
Area Two 11.6i.16.2i.11.6i.16.2!.10.i:~;,~'-~l %
Are.:!three 5.0r.8.2i.4.77-7.9Z 4.41.7.67-
tH':~~.'3 tour 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.o.Iji.0.0i.0.0i.
Area Five 4.17.7.1i.3.0?5.87-3.0i;5.6i~
Area Sil-;0.77.2.3i.Ou?~.")1"li1lf ~""I 2.:37-~•.J/.,J.!I.
Are.:!Seven 0.5io 1.9;~0.57-1.97-0.3i.1.57-
Ar e·:!Ei gilt 0.01.:0.5i.0.0i.0.51.:0.0i.O.5;~
Area Nine 0.67-2.01.:.0%0.3i..07.0.87-
Area Ien 0.07.O.O!0.0i.0.0i.0.07.O.O~
Area Eleven 0.01.:0.0%0.07.0.0i.0.0t:0.0i.
Area Iwelve 0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.07.CIOk 0.0i':
Area thirteen 4.3i.7.57.4.37.7.3%4.17.7 .li~
Area Fourteen 4.1i.7.1i.4.17.7.17-:3.6i~6.4%
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.31.l.n:0.3i.1.7~0.37.l.57.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.87-2.6i.0.87-2.47-0.8i.2.4i.
Kerlai Peninsul.:!.Oi.1.0i..0%1.0i..07.1.0:~
Copper R./14rangel1/Valdez 2.07.4.27.2.0i.4.2i.1.(,7.3.87-
Southeast Alaska 0.07.0.37.0.07.0.37.0.07.0.31.
Elsewhere in Al~sk~9.1%13.31.9.01.13.27.7.8~11.8%
Outside Alask~0.07.0.37.0.07.0.3i.O.O?0.0i.
lJ
B-140
{
I
I
I
.J
}
I
1
I
)
\
!
I )
)
I
I
I
Table B.128.
Susitna Hydroelectric P~oject,Number of
Rural Households Using Winter Off-Road Vehicles by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GtDGF:APH Ie LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAl.3sk<l 1370 1540 1350 1520 1210 1390InA1.:!ska 1360 1540 1340 1510 1~~0 1390SusitnaStudyAre.:s 1110 1290 1050 1220 St70 IHOAreaOne601206012060lJOAre.:!Two 310 430 310 4.30 270 380Are·:!Three 130 220 120 210 120 :00Areafour()0 0 ()0 0Are.:!Five no 190 80 150 80 15f~lAre.)Si~<20 60 20 60 20 60Are.:!Seven 10 50 10 50 10 ~OAre:'3 Ei9ht 0 10 0 10 0 10Are.:!Nine 10 50
0 0 0 0AreaEleven00000II\JAre;3 Twelve 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaThirteen120200no200110190Are.'3 Fourteen 110 190 110 190 90 17010MilesNorthofDen.3li Hwy 10 40 10 40 IG'40Anchorage/Chu9ach I1tn.Are.:s 20 70 20 60 20 60KenaiPeninsula0300301130\J...._~0.!l.pel'~lWr~.fl.g~JJLV.'31dez .._...----50-·-·-.110.····---····---50··········-11·0--··-···---40-·_·-1"00 --SOIJtheast Alaska 0 1.0 0 to 0 10ElseWhereinAl.3ska 240 350 240 350 210 310OutsideAlaska010()10 I).;)
Table B.l29.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Skiing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 62.3%64.9%58.91.61.77.&'""')o"!55.6:4i\.Jwel",U.
In Alask.:!61.0r.63.6%58.0r.60.37.52.3X 55.1i.I J Susitna Study Area 17.27.19.47.16.51.18.77.13.9i:15.'37.
Are.:!One 0.87-1.41.0.87-1.4i.0.6i.1.2i.
Area Two 7.7'1.9.3'1.7.41.9.01.G.lI.715j~
Area Three '1 ""'I 3.57.2.41.3.4%2.0k '1 i:Z1f4A•.Ji.WlloJ/.
Are:~tour .01.0.27-.0%o ')".O;~OI2;~ewi.
Area five 0.4i.0.8%0.47.0.8?O.2i.F'i r./'.1.01.
Area Sil-:0.91.1.57.0.8%1.47.0.7%1 ..,.,
•.J/lI
Are.:!Seven O.l;{0.57.0.1i.0.57-o.1;!O.3:~
Are.:!Eight 0.0%0.07.0.0i.0.07-0.0%OIO;·~
Area Nine 0.11.0.51.O.lI.0.51.0.1r.0.31.
Area Ten .07.0.27-•or.O.2i..0:4 0.27.
Area Eleven 0.01.0.07.O.O;!O.O;!0.07.0.07-
Area Twelve .0%0.27-.Ok 0.27..07.0.27.
Area Thirteen 0.97.1.51.0.91.1.57.0.3:;:1.4i.Are.:!FOIJrteen 1.27-1.8i.1.2%1.8i-LOt.1.6i.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.07.1.6i.0.9i.1.5%O.Si-1.41.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 32.0i.34.67.30.8%33.47-28.07-30.67.
f(enai PeninslJla 2.67.3.6~!'1 'J'i'3.3:!2.0!2..87."0""'.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.47.0.87.0.47.0.87.0.37.0.7%
Southeast Al.3sk.:!0.67.1.27.0.57.0;9i.0.37.o.7i~
Elsewhere in Alaska 12.07.13.8i.11.37.13.1i.10.01.11.8i.
Outside Alaska 0.97.1.5!0.6%1.0i.O.2~O.Gi~
u
B-l42
Table B.130.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Skiing by Area
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~ska
In Alaska
Susitn~Study Are~
Are~One
Are:~Two
Are:~Three
Area Four
Area Five
Are.,Si>:
Area Seven
Are:~Eight
Are~Nine
Are.:!len
Are~Twelve
Area Thirteen
Are:~Fourteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchorage/Chugach Htn.Area
Kenai Peninsul.:!
Copper R./Wr~ngell/Valdez
Southeast Alaska·_--·-------Ersewherelr;-1i13sk.3 -----------
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWOTTflULOWHIGHn.,.;..
76440 79710 72360 75680 64840 68220748307812071250745806422067610211502378020310229001708019500100017001000170078014309490113809130110007490'320031004260299041302430347020230.···20 230 20 230471\1000 470 1000 280 710'~
1100 1840 1000 1700 890 157018055018055090400000000180550180550'30 4002023020230202:30
20 230 20 230 20 23011001840110018401000170014302250143022501210198012101980110018401000170039280424803782040990344203751032204390288040002430347047010004701000370850__780 _..___l1J.L .________580_____1140.______---370------850·-----
14700
J
I
I
I
I
(
j
I
.\
)
I
I
I
\
I
1
I
I
\1I )
Table B.13L
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Skiing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC WCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~63.lI.67.1i.59.5i.6"rl"53.1i.i:'"'i-I-.J.II,·J/.·J ...
In Al~ska 61.7%65.77.58.57.62 11 7Z 52.6;~56:a8i:
Susitn~Study Area H.n 17.9%14.17.17.l7.1l.4i:lA 'J'I10lUI.
Area One 0.7%1.57.il ""/1.57.O.5k 1 ".!'\I'/i..,.J,..
Are.3 Two G.S;!8.77.6.li:8.3i.4.87.6.3%
Area Three 1.8i.3.0?1.77-2..3i:1.3:~"1 1:"/~,..~j.
Are.3 FOlJr .Oi.0.2i..O?0.27-.07.O.2~
Area five 0.3i.0.9?0.27.0.87-0.1i.O.7i:
Are::!Sb:0.71.1.5i.0.67.1.4i.0.57-1.3i.
Are:~Seven .Oi~0.47..07.o.4i:.Of.0.4:'
Are~Ei9ht 0.0i.0.07.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0%
Area Nine 0.17.O.5Z 'J •Ii.0.57-"'I O.4~~•tj!.
Are<l Ten 0'1 0.2i..Oi.0.27-.07.o '1'/•fa ''''/11
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0i.0.07.O.O;~
\J Are.3 Twelve .Ok 0.27-.Oio 0.27-.07-O.2k
Are~Thirteen 0.7i.1.57.0.7%1.5Z 0.67.1.4;~
Area rOIJrteen 0.8i.:1.87.0.77.1.77.O.&i.1.4i.
10 Miles North of Den~li Hwy 1.Oi:2.07.0.87-'Q"0.7%1.7=~.L ".U.
Anchorage/Chug~ch Mtn.Are~34.7i.38.7i.33.4k 37.4%I'Jt,Ij:~"':tA -')rt'l
oJ ....•awl.·.J ...\Ji.
f{en~i PeninslJl~2.6i.4.27.2.47.3.87.2.0:t 3.4i.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 0.0i.O.Oi.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0%
Southeast Alaska 0.67.1.47.0.47-1.27.0.31.0.97.
Elsewhere in Alaska 11.9i.14.n 11.2?14.01.9.97-12.5i.
OlJtside Alaska 0.8%1.87-0.5i.1.37.O.U 0.77.
I Il)
\J
J
B-144
Table B.132.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Skiing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofA1~sk~67000 71290 63240 67620InAl.3ska 65490 69820 62170 66570Susitn~Study Are~15650 18980 14940 18200AreaOne70016407001640Are.:!Two 6880 9270 6480 8810Are.3 Three 1860 3240 1770 3120Are.:!Four 0 250 0 250Are~Five 290 980 210 850Are.:!Si>:700 1640 610 1510Are.:!Seven 10 410 10 410Are.:!Eight 0 0 0 0AreaNine7056070560Are~Ten 0 250 0 250
Are.:!Twelve 0 250 0 250Are.'3 Thirteen 700 1640 700 1640Are.:!fOIJrteen 870 1890 780 176010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy105021408701890Anchor~ge/Chu9~ch Mtn.Are~36810 41150 35450 39750f(enai PeninslJh 2800 4430 2510 4070CopperR./Wrangel1/Valdez 0 0 0 0SoutheastAlas~.a 610 1510 ......_4.531........1250..._...~_._._~.__._"._--_."""--"""'----'..-,.__.__..._-"---Elsewhere"ll'f-Al:'3sk:a-'-'T2'60-(f 15660 11890 14880Outs-ide-Al.'3sl<:a 870-ra~rO 530 1380
B-145
1984
LOW HIGH
56390 60870
55860 60340
12090 15100
530 1380
5110 7210
1400 2630o.250
140 710
530 1380
10 410
o 0
10 410
o 250
o 250
610 1510
610 1510
780 1760
32200 :36410
2140 3600
o 0
.--..290-..--.....:980-..·.---~-
10480 1.3.329,_
140 710
)
)
I
I
I
Table B.133.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Skiing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~SK~49.6i.54.0i.47.7%52.1~43.6i.48.0i.
In Alask~49.1i.53.5,47.57-5l.9:!43.5j~41'.9j~
Susitn~Study Are~26.37.30.3i:25.9i~29.9i~23.7i.'i~C"'i
':';'i •oJ/.
Are.:!One 0.3%0.9:!0.3%().9i~0.37-o Ct'f'Ja
Are.:!Two 12.47.l5.4i.12.27-11::-1"/11.17.14.Ii.oJ.wi.
Are~Three 5.3i.7.5%5.3~'1 r:'f 4.Bi:6.8,:".,J",
I ]Are.:!FOIJr 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.
[.Area Five 0.3%0.9i.0.37.O.9j~0.3%O.'37-
Are.:!Si:<1.0i.2.2%1.0i.2.2%1.0i.2.0i.
(1
Area Seven O.2~~0.3i.0.2%o.ai.0.1%O.7i.
Are~Eight .Oi.0.4i..Ok 0.4i..Oi.0.47.
Are~Nine .07-0.2%.0%0.2i..07.O.2!
Are~Ten .Oi.O.2k .Oi.0.27-.Oi.o .-1'1.41n
Are~Eleven .O~0.2i.0'/0.27-0'/O.2;!•10 •10
Area Twelve 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.01.0.0i.
Are~Thirteen 0.6%1.6%0.6%1.47.0.5%1.3i~
Are.:!Fourteen 2.37-3.9i.2.3i.3.77.2.07-3.4i~
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.27.0.87.0.27.0.87.0.27-O.8!
AnchQr~ge/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 10.87-l3.6i.9.9i.12.7i.9.0i.11.6%
Kenai Peninsula 0.47.1.27.0.47.1.2~'0.47.1.2;!
Copper R./Wr~ngell/V~ldez 3.n:r:r:OJ 3.6i.5.4i.3.41.C"'1'ioJ.oJ/..Jaw,.
Southeast Alask~.07.0.27..07.0.2%.07-o '1'".",1.
Elsewhere in Al~sKa 8.a7-11.4i.B.5;~11.11.7.7~10.3%
Outside Alask~0.37.0.97.0.17.0.57..Oi.O.2i.
lJ
Ll
B-146
Table B.134.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Skiing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPH IC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al.3sli.:a 6880 7490 6620 7230 6050 6660
In Alasli.:a 6810 7420 6590 7200 6040 6650
SIJsi tn.'3 Study Are.'3 3650 4200 3600 4150 3290 3820
Are.'3 One 40 130 40 130 40 130
Are.'3 Two 1720 2140 1690 2110 1550 1950
Are:a Three 740 1040 740 1040 660 950
Are.'3 FOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Five 40 130 40 130 40 130
Are:a Six 150 300 150 300 130 280
Are:a Seven 30 110 30 110 20 90
Are.:!Eight 0 ~O 0 50 0 50
Are:a Nine 0 30 0 30 0 30
Are.'3 Ten 0 30 0 30 0 30
Area Eleven 0 30 0 30 0 30
_._---~-~-.._~-~.~-----_·_------_·_-----~---·--Are;3-Twelve~-----------.~---,······------·+0---------0---·--------"-------0----··------0--------0----0-
Area Thirteen 90 220 30 200 70 180
Are.'3 FOIJrteen 320 540 310 520 280 470
10 Miles North of [Ienali Hwy 30 110 30 110 30 110
Anchor·'3ge/Ch'J9:ach Mtn.Are.:!1490 1890 1380 1760 1240 Vjl0
Kenai Peninsula 60 170 60 170 60 l?O
Copper R.lWr.'3ngell/V.:!ldez 510 770 500 750 470 720
SQuthe:ast Alaska 0 30 0 30 0 30
_____,.£1 sewhet~i(LAllS!~:2 ...1.220 1590~."-----.----1-180 ..-~1540.-------1070~-14.20--.-...+...__•_
Outside Al.'3sli..'3
B-147
1
1
)
1
I
I
,.I
I
-I
1
I
J
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
Table B.l35.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percen~age
of Rural Households Skiing·by Area
I
!
i
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 63.2%69.4%59.31.65.71.53.97-60.5%
In Alaska 63.0%69.2%59.2i:65.67-53.'3k 60.57.
Susitna St'Jdy Area 43.07-49.67-40.7'1.47.37-38.?~~45.3::
Are·:!One 1.6i.3.87.1.6i.3.87.1.5k r ,CUfoJ.1.01;,
Are.;!Two 16.01.21.27-151177.20.7i.15.07.20.01.
Ii
Area Three 5.9%9.37.5.67.9.07-C"'j'"8 ?~!,J.,.Ji,
II ".
Area four 0.01.0.3%O.Qi.0.37.0.01.0.3i.
Area five 1.17.2.9%0.9%"J '[!If 0.87-2.4i~.a.lIJll
Area Six lobi.3.67-0.87.2.6i.0.67-2.27-
Area Seven 0.31.1.n 0.3%1.n o 'j"!1 7 1 /•W"J.II'I•
Area Eight 0.0i.0.51.0.0i.0.57-0.07.0.51.
Area Nine .07-0.87-.Oi.0.87-O.O~0.77-
I I Are.;!Ten 0.07-0.07-O.Oi~0.0r.0.07.o.Oi~IJ Area Eleven .01.0.81..0%0.87-0.01.o r,.t
II':I~
Area Twelve 0.07.0.77.0.0r.0.77.0.07-0.77.
Area Thirteen 4.07-7.07-3.6i.6.47.3.6r.6.4i.
Are.:!fourteen 3.3%/i.n 3.3i.6.1i.3.2i.G.07.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy o ")./1.47-0.2%1.47-O.2~1.4;~.....
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 6.9%10.77.6.4i.10.0;:5.27-8.67.
f(enai Peninsul.:!.07.1.0i..Oi.1.0i..01.o ijlll
.Uill
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 2.41.4.8i.1.17-2.9;:0.87.2.6%
SQutheast Alaska 0.0%0.5;:0.01.0.57-0.0r.o ell.'Io!1.
I I Elsewhere in Alaska 10.87-15.2:>':10.3i.14.7'J.8.97.13.17.
I OIJtside Alaska 0.0%o.n 0.07.0.57-0.01.o 'j'/lJ Iw/,
U
IJ
B-148
Table B.136.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Skiing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~1680 1850 1580 1750InAlaska1680184015701740SusitnaStudyAre~.1140 1320 1080 1260AreaOne4010040100Are·3 Two 430 560 420 550AreaThree160250150240Are~FQljr'10 0 10AreaFive30802070Are.3 Si:{40 100 20 70AreaSeven10401040
Are:~Eight 0 10 0 10AreaNine020020
Are~Ten 0 0 0
0 20AreaTwelve020020AreaThirteen1101909011'0Are:;l FOIJrteen 90 160 90 160
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 10 40 10 40Anchor~ge/Chugach Mtn.Are:~180 280 170 270f(enai Peninsula 0 30 0 30CopperR./Wr:,mgell/V.31dez 60 130 30 80
-'--"'--~"-'-"----'---'-'--'--"""--------SoIJtheast-Al.3sk.a-~----·-·--------·--0··-----10---··-·--·--~0--·-----1O--
Outside Al.3ska 0 20 0 10
B-149
1'384
LOW HIGH
1430 1610
1430 1610
1030 1200
40 90
400 530
140 230
o 10
20 60
20 60
10 40
o 10
o 20
o 20
o 20
90 170
90 160
10 40
140 230
o 20
20 70
'-'-·'-'--0-.··----TO··--.--_..-.....---.
o 10
I
'-j
I
I
I
J
j
I
)
!
I I
J
nII
I
I]
IIu
IJ
IJ
U
Table B.137.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Boating by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~65.7i.68.37-63.47.66.01.53.6i.~'..-,';._";j •.li,.
In A1~ska 63.47-66.0i:61.5t;64.17-52,'37-C'C"7#f.J,J Q i fg
Susitna Study Are~32.1i.34.77.31.3i.33.9;'r,r 1:.'11,1 ',":-1;.0:1.:..O.·J;a W!,J ••li.
Area One 1.2%1.87.1.2/.1 ;\"1 1.07.1.6;~sui.
Area Two 6.67.8.07.6.51.7.97.5.6i~7.0k
Ar e:~Three 2.7~3.n i.6%3.6;~~.2k 3.0i~
Are.:!tour 0.01.0.07.0.01.0.07.O.O;~0.01.
Area five '1 "'f 3.5t;2.31.1'"',li&.f 2.0;!2.8%"".,JJa ~.,ji.
Are.:!5il-:1.01.1.61.1.01.1.61.0.87.1.47.
Area Seven O.6~~1.2%0.67.1.2%0.47-Ci n S7.
Are.:!Eight 0.07.0.07.0.01.0.01.0.01.o.Oi:
Area Nine 0.67.1.07.0.67-1.Oi~0.47-O.S;:
Area Ten .01.0.2,0.01.0.01.0.01.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.01.tJ~O~'
Are.:!Twa 1ve .01.0.21..07-o fi'/.07.(I ')'1awl.Vlw/.
Area Thirteen 5.87.7 ':I'{r lOa]7.O;~4.':1%G.li.....n ,J.bio
Area Fourteen 7.57-9.17.7.31.8.97-6.17.M t:"111lII.Ji~
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.37.o.n 0.37-0.71.0.27.0.6::
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 3.61.4.87.3.57.4.51.2.8;~':I QU
-.J al••JI.
Kenai Peninsula 21.41.23.87-20.97-23.17-18.2;~20.4~!
Copper'R./Wrangell/V~ldez 2.21.3.01.2.27.3.07.1.97.'1 "'f.w.J /I
Southeast Alaska 1.8%2a6X 1.7%2.57-1.3X 1 C)'I•..r/.
Elsewhere in Alaska 14.6%16.6%14.01.16.07.11.47.1'')'1'1....,.~/.
Outside Alaska 2.1%2.97-1.77-2.57.o.n 1.37.
.B-1SO
Table B.138.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Boating by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLI!S
GEOGRAPH Ie LOCAL ION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt ot Al.-aska 80650 83840 77800 81040 65820 69200
In Alask.3 77800 81040 75450 78730 64960 68350
SIJsi tn."Study Are.-a 39400 42600 38430 41610 32480 35520
Area One 1430 2250 1430 2250 1210 1'380
Are.-a Iwo 8080 9840 7960 9720 6910 8560
Area !hree3330 4530 3220 4390 2650 3730
Are.~tour 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Five 3100 4260 2880 4000 2430 3470
Are.-a Si:-~1210 1980 1210 1980 1000 1700
Area Seven 780 1430 780 1430 470 1000
Are:~Eight 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Nine 680 1280 680 1280 470 1000
-----~._-_.~_._--~..~--_._.._--_.__...._.-·······-·-··-·Area Ien·---···-10·-·····230·---···-····--0··-····0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 I)
Are.3·Iwe 1ve 20 230 20 230 20 230
Area Thirteen 7140 8820 6910 8560 5980 7530
Are.3 tour teen 9250 11130 9020 10870 7490 9200
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 370 850 370 850 280 no
Anchor:~ge/Chljgach Mtn.Area 4470 5840 4240 5580 3440 4660
f{enai Peninsula 26320 29160 25600 28410 22350 25030
.........................-.--Cop per-.R •IWr.3nge ll/V.31dez-·······-··2650-······3730····-----2650--31'-30··-··--···--2310··--·3330····-······-··-·
____--"Solj.the"3s.LAl;~sk.a ·~200--3200 20l;)0--3060 1"§40--2~90-------
Elsewhere in A1.3ska 17920 20380 17200 19630 139BO 16210
Outside Alaska 2540 3600 2090 3060 890 15/'0
I 1
r
( I
I :1
I
j
I
I
j
)
I
j
·1
1
I
)
I
I I
I
[I
I I
l
I ]
Table B.l39.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Boating by Area
I I URBAN HOUSEHOLDSI )
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
II LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~."C''J'a!69.3i.62.8i.&6.87.52.77-56.91.b"".-w;.
In Alask::!62.67.66.6i~60.77-64.77.51.87.56.0i-
I]Susitn::!Study Are::l 30.0i.34.01.29.2h l"\'j ,")I.t 24.37-28.11..joj •.:./.
Are::!One 1.0i.2.07-1.07-2.07-0.87-1.a~I I Are.~Two 5.6;~7.87-5.67.7.8i:'i.Si-G.8;~
Area Three 1.'n 3.37.1 Q'/3.3i.1.57-2.7~
I
••no
Are::l tOJJr'0~0i.0.01.0.0i.0.07.0.01.0.07.
Area Five 2.27-3.6i.2.07.3.4%1 ')'1 2.9:1.• f n
Area Si>:0.77.1.7%0.77.1.7;~O.6i~1.4/;
[1
Are::!Seven 0.57-1.37.0.5i.1 ''j~l 0.:3%0.9r.••...ii.
Area Eight 0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07-0.0%0.07.
Area Nine 0.3i.1.17-0.37.1.Ii:O.3X 0.97.
IJ
Area Ten .Oi.0.27-0.07-O.O;~0.07.o.O;~
Are·3 Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0';0.07-
Are.:!Twelve .Or.0.27-.07.0.2i..07.0.27-
Area Thirteen 5.47.7.47-5.2%7.2%4.47-6.2%
Are~FOIJrteen 7.1%9115i.7.0i.9.47.5.77-7.13:1.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.2i.0.8i.0.2%1\'J't 0.27-0.8i.v,Un
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 3.77.5.5%")C:IIJ'5.3~.~.Q'!4.51.\J .oJ/.114'.11,
Ken.3i Peninsula 22:7%26.37.22.0i.25.6Z 19.2i:22.671.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 1.27-2.2i.1.2l ")')"I.Ok 2.07-.:..,;,,/.
Southeast A1::!ska 1.8~3.0%1.n 2.9:'1 '1,(l"'\•.,.,
.L.w;,.,;.i.~i•
I_J
Elsewhere in Alaska 14.3;::17.5r.13.87-16.8i.11.01.13.8%
Outside Alaska 2.2%3.6;::1.7i.2.9%0.77.1.7X
U
U
U
B-152
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Table B.140.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Boating by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER.1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Al.3sk:a 69370 73590 66680 70980 55970 60450
In Al.3ska 66460 70770 64420 68770 55010 59490
SIJSitn.3 Study Are.3 31890 36090 31050 35230 25850 29810
Area One 1050 2140 1050 2140 3i'0 1890
Are.3 TWEi 5990 8240 5990 8240 5110 7210
Are.:!Ihree 2050 3480 2050 3480 1580 2880
Are.3 tOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Five 2320 3840 2140 3600 1770 3120
Are.3 Si>:780 1760 780 1760 610 1510
Area Seven 530 1380 530 1380 290 980
Are.3 Ei9ht 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Nine 370 1120_.~"~1Z~L __~J120 ...._290 ..980 __._..."~'..---~ArerTen----'··..·---...----O-..--.250--.~-0 0 0 0
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Twelve 0 250 0 250 0 250
Area Thirteen 5700 7900 5500 7670 4620 6640
Area Fourteen 7570 10060 7470 9940 6090 8360
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 210 850 210 850 210 850
Anchor.3'je/Chu9·3ch Mtn.Are.3 3940 5830 3750 5600 3080 4780
.'enai Peninsula 24090 27960 23360 27200 20370 24030
..__~_..C.oppeLR.L\rlr.angelllValde:::...·..--··1220---..--2B90·------·-~1220 ----2390----......-r050-..·--2[40 ---
Southeast Alaska 1860--3240 ~7~O--31~O 1220--239Q'~-----
Elsewhere in A1ask:a 15240 18530 14630 17870 11690 14650
OIJtside Al.3ska 2320 3840 1770 3120 780 1760
B-153
(I
)
i J
I
I
)
,I
j
I I
)
]
I
I
')
)
j
I
I
I
Table B.141.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Boating by Area
I
1
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
I
I GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGHI'In or out of Alaska 62.47-66.67.61.27-65.4i.54.3~58.77.
I I In A1.:!ska 62.0i.66.2i;60.9;!65.17.54.3:!58.7:~
Susitna Study Are.;!38.47-42.87-37.87-42.0i:34.0i.38.27-
Area One 0.97-1.9i.0.9i.1.97.0.67-l.(ii~
Area Two 8.6i:11.2i.8.4i~11.0i.7.97.10.57.
Area Three 6.07-8.2i.5.9%8.1?C"'1'(r'J COlt.J.~i.I .J/•
Area tOIJf 0.07.0.07-0.07.0.07.0.07.0.01.
Are.:!Five 3.07-4.6%2.8%4.47.2.37-3.9~
Are:~Si:·:1.2~2.4i.1.27.2.47.1.0i.2.0;!
Area Seven 0.3%1.17-0.37-1.U o 'j'l {\<:1"/.\JI.1.I'.ir.
Area Eight .07.0.47..07.0.4i..Oi.0.47-
Area Nine 0.37-1.17-0.37.0.97-0.37.0.97-
Are.:!Ten .07.0.27-.07.0.27-.07.0.27.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.0i::0.0%0.07-0.0i.0.07.
Area Twelve .Oi:0.2i:.0;(0.27-0'1 0.27..'"Area Thirteen 6.3i:a.5i::GD2~8.47.5.57-I'"J 1',,/
I./Ia
Are.:!Fourteen 6.2%8.4%6.17.8.37.5.37.7.57-
10 Miles North of Denali.Hwy 0.17.0.5i..07.0.47-.OI O.4i:
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 0.57.1.37.0.57-1.37.0.3i.loll.
Kenai Peninsula 9.37.12.1%9.17-n.n 7.9%10.57.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 7.8i::10.41.7.87-10.41.7.0i.9.41.
Southeast Alaska 0.47.1 '1'1 0.3;/;1.1:'O.l;~O.5;~....".
Elsewhere in Alaska 12.17.15.1i.11.97.14.9i.10.37.13.n
Outside Alaska 0.17.·o.n 0.17.0.5i-.0%0.4%
I j
IJ
B-154
Table B.142.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Boating by Area
I
,I.,.
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
1820
50
1430
o
2070
7010
Iii5ii2100
90
1680
20DIJtsideAlaska
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH ..~In or OIJt of Al.3sk.3 8660 9240 8490 9080 7540 8140 \Irl Alaska 8600 9190 8450 9040 7540 8140SIJsitn.3 Study Are:;l 5340 5930 5240 5840 4720 5300
>IAreaOne12027012027090220AreaTwo119015601170153011001450Are.3 Three 830 1140 820 1130 746 1!J40Are.3 Four 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,Area Five 410 640 390 610 320 540Are.3 Si:{170 330 170 330 130 280AreaSeven501505015040130 ]Area Eight 0 50 0 50 0 50AreaNine501504013040130~-~-~-~-------~-Area-~'1'en--~---~---------0-----~~-30-.---~-·-0---~--30---0-·30 ----_.__._------~._..~_...._._-_..._----~
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.3 Twe 1ve 0 30 0 30 0 30AreaThirteen870119085011707601070AreaFourteen85011708401160740104010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy1070050050Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 70 180 70 180 50 150KenaiPeninsula130016701260163011001450 \.
._._--_..•_-,-~--".~--~_~_~_~p.p.er Po ,jWr ·3D.gellLV"31dez __-.~__~1090_~__lAAL ___~______~1 0$0-1440--~---------~970-~---lc3-l0-------fSoutheastAlaska
.!
J
Table B.143.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Boating by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 67.2%'7':)?'f &4.7i.70.9i.54.CI;~60.67.I...:•..".
In Al.:isk.j 66.97-72.9?64.57-70.7~!54.07.60.67.
Susitna Study Area 50.7i.57.3k 48.57-55.IX 41.67.4....'1'1a.uh
Area One 2.1i.4.57-2.1k 4.57.1.77.1"',r\'!..J.~iia
Area Two 12.5i:17.1i.12.1k 16.77-11.l7.15.5Z
Ar·e.:i Three 4.3i:7.5%4.31.7.3i.4.0:!7.0%
Are.:i Pour 0.07-O.Ok 0.0i.0.07-O.QX 0.07.
Area five 4.37-'1 r;'t1f 4.2%'7 1')'/:3.4i~b.2;·~I .,.JI.I.u-I.
Are::!Sil-:0.6i.2.0i.O.6~2.07-0.57.1.'3%
Area Seven 0.7%2.3;:;0.7%'1 ')'1 0.3:4 111 7~~~'\JI.
Are.3 Eight 0.01.0.07.0.0i.0.01.0.01.0.0i.
Area Nine 1.61.3.87.0.9%I'}f"JIl(Olll~~1 ',",i,j .11a •J,J.
Are::l Ten 0.0r.0.07-0.01.0.0i.O.Oi:0.0%
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0i.0.0%0.07.0.0%o.();~
Are.3 Twelve 0.0%0.01.0.01.0.0%0.07.VcOI
Are.3 Thirteen 5.37-a.~7%5.3";8 ..,.,4.tl k 7.'3;~.1 J.
Area fOIJrteen 9.5%13.14 8.8i.13.07-7 ,).,ll.H.-.J/.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.2i.1.2%0.27.1.2%()';,,!1.27..Wl'
Anchorage/Chug::lch Mtn.Are.3 0.9%2.74 0.97-2.7i.0.71.2.37.
f{enai Peninsula 6.8%10.67.6.8i.10.67-l:'t7.,9.1;!J.J i.
Copper R./Wrangell/V::lldez 2.4%4.8%2.07-4.4%1.61.3.6Z
Southeast Alaska 0.8%2.6k 0.8:4 2.47-o 7"1"):r,1"
I.,Ja."'a\oJi,
Elsewhere in Alaska 10.17-14.5%9.87-14.07-'i C'1f 11.37.,.oJ/.
Outside Alaska 0.07.0.7:'0.07-0.57-0.07-0.3%
B-1S6
j
!
II
\
1
I
,L !
J
,
I
'j
,.1
I,
,I
I
._....~~_.~.._.~----(
1\
,I
·1
:I
.\
I
i 1'.
10o
1984
LOW HIGH
1440 1610
1440 1610
IHO 1280
50 100
290 410
110 190
o 0
90 l?O
10 50
Hi 40
o 0
{)30
o 0
10o
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
1720 1890
1720 1880
1290 1470
60 120
320 440
110 200
o 0
110 190
10 50
20 60
o 0
20 70
o 0
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
o 0 0 0
140 230 120 210
240 340 190 300
o ~0 ~
20 70 20 GO
180 280 150 240
50 120 40 100
----20--·-60·-··--------20------60----
EVER
LOW HIGH
1790 1950
1780 1940
1350 1520
60 120
330 460
120 200
o 0
120 200
10 50
20 GO
o 0
40 100
o 0
Table B.144.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Boating by Area
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alaska
Susitn~Study Are~
Are~One
Are~Two
tire.:!Three
Are.:!fOIJr
Are~Five
Are~Si>:
Are~Seven
Are.'3 Ei'jht
Area Nine
Are.'3 Ten
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Uut!ilde Alaska 0 20
Are~Twelve 0 0
Area Thirteen 140 230
Area fourteen 250 360
10 Miles North of [fen~li Hwy 0 30
Anchor<lge/Chu'j<lch Mtn.Area 20 70
Kenai Peninsula 180 280
Copper R.lWr.'3rI'3ell/V:~ldez 60 130
-.-.----.__AQ'Jtl}~.::!~LA.bsk,:!._...____20------.--70--..
Elsewhere
f ",I
!
Table B.145.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Camping by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
\
GEOGRAPHIC LOCAtION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
)LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or aut of Al~sk~59.2i.:62.0i.co,",'jll 60.Ii.48.5i.51.:37.·JI 1-...11.
In Alask~57 •.5;'60.3i.:55.9i.58.77-47.9~50.7;~
SIJsi tn.:!Study Are.:!29.U 31.14 28.3i.30.9i.24.01.26.4%
Are.:!One 3.1~!4.Ii.3.0i.4.0i.2.57-3.5i~
Are.:!two 8.91.10.57-8.61.lO.2;~7.27-8.6%
Area three 3.9%5.1:'3.6i.4.87-'1 0'1 3.87....u,.
Are;~tOIJr .07-O.2;~.O~o .),/.Oh 0.21.,..,,.
Area Pive 1.2;!1.87.1.I:!I.n 1.0%1.67-
Area Sil-:1.2%1.8i.1.27.I.Bi:0.81.1.47.
Area Seven 0.7%1.3%0.7%1.37-0.67.1.0;!
Area Eight O.Oi.:0.01.0.07-0.0i.:0.0i.:0.0i.
Area Nine o.n 1.3%0.6i.1.2j~0.67.1.07.
Are.:!Ten .07.0.2%.Oi.:O.2i.:.O~O.2i~
Area Eleven 0.07.0.0%0.07.0.07.0.07.O.Ok
Area 'rwelve o ')'/O.6i.:0.2%0.67.o ..)'/0.6%I..,la '''hIAreathirteen3.37.4.3k 3.27-4.2%2.97-3119j~
Area FOIJrteen 2.3i.3.37.r)'"lGj t'\···I-t 2.1~2.9%WI,J,.·j.,J/.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.17.1.7%1.07.I.6i.0.9i.1.5;!
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are.:!10.51.12.3%10.17.11.9i.8.7k 10.3%
f(en;:li Peninsul.:!13.8r.15.87.13.67.15.67.11.97.1rt rIa,J.ll'.
Copper R./Wrangel1/V~ldez 1.3%1.9i.I.2i.L87.0.9i.1.5i:
Southeast Alaska 1.07-1.67-1.0i.1.6%0.6i.1.07.
Elsewhere in A1ask~13.4i.15.47.12.7i.14.7i.lO.n 12.5i.
Outside Alask.:!1.37.2.1;'1.17-1.17.O.G~I.2i.
[ I
LJ
B-158
Table B.146.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Camping by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In'or out of Alaska 72730 76050 70380 73730 59560 62950
In Alaska 70630 73970 68660 72020 58820 62J20
SIJsitn:~Study Are.:!35750 38880 34780 37890 29460 32410
Are:~One 3790 5050 3670 4920 3100 4260
Are.::i Two 10900 12910 10550 12530 8780 10610
Area Three 4820 6230 4470 5840 3440 4660
Are.3 POIJf 20 230 20 230 20 230
Area Five 1430 2250 1320 2120 1210 1980
Area Sil-:1430 2250 1430 2250 1000 1700
Are·3 Seven 890 1570 890 1570 680 1280
Area Eight 0 0 0 0 ...~...._q
...............Are-aMine'"....·......890-1570···..'80·..1430"680 1280
Are.:!Ten 20 230 20 230 20 230
Are.3 Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Twelve 280 710 280 710 280 710
Area Thirteen 4020 5310 3900 5180 3560 4790
Area tOIJrteen 2880 4000 2880 4000 2540 3600
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1320 2120 1210 1980 1100 1840
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 12910 15070 12440 14570 10670 12660
.........__Ken:~LP.eninsuL:!_-._-.--.-169GO--..·19370-----167-20---191f!O·..-·--·14580-16850·..·-··..·__···
______---'C:.::oLJpp:.::e~r""R=.I"",W:.=..f..==angell/Val.Q.e.z 15AO--23.90-----1.430--2250 1.100--1340---
SOIJtheast A1.3ska 1210 1980 1210 1980 680 1280
Elsewhere in Alask.3 16480 18870 15650 17990 13150 15330
Outside Alaska 1650 2530 1320 2120 780 1430
(
,.1
i
i
:!
\
J
1
1
I
f
)
Ii
Table B.147.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Camping by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 59.57-6')...~57.6%61.8%48.61.5"0'1w.II..:a.u",
In Al.3ska 57.77-61.9%56.1%60.3%4/'.9%57·1k
Susi tn.3 Study Are.3 27.8i.31.6%27.0i.30.81.22.6i.26.2/.
Area One 2.8;'4.4%.,"'I 4.3%2.31.3.7;~.;,,./t.
Are.3 Two 8.27-10.67-7.97-10.37.6.5%:i "'1/0.1,.
Area Three 3.3~5.U 3.1i.4.71.2.3%...,'1'/
"Jo/,o
Area POIJr .Oi.0.21..01.0.27-0.0i.0.0%
Area Five 0.9%1.9;~0.8i.LSi.0.77-1.71.
Are.3 Si>:0.9i.1.97-0.91.1.97.O.6i.11l4Z
Area Seven 0.5i.1.37.O.5i~1.37.o ':J'J 1.17.I'I.JI,
Are.3 Eight 0.07-O.Oi:0.07-0.0i.0.0i.0.07.
Area Nine 0.6%1.47.0.67-1.47.0.5i.1.3%
Area Ten .0:1.0.27-O.O!.O.Oi.0.07-0.01.
Area Eleven 0.07-0.07-0.07.O.O;~0.07-o.Oi~
Area Twelve 0.1i.o.n O.lI.0.71.0.17.0.77-
Area Thirteen 3.07.4.67-2.97.4.57.2.6i.4.2i~
Are·3 POIJrteen 2.27-3.67.2.2k 3.6;~1.97-:3.3Z
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.07.2.01.0.97.1.97-o ".,1.77.• /t.
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 11.37-14.17.11.07-13.S7-'3.47-12.0i~
Kenai Peninsul.3 14.67.17.87.14.3Z 17.57.12.47-15.47.
Copper R./Wrange11/Valdez 0.67-1.47-0.57-1.37-O.3k 1.U
Southeast Alaska 0.97-1.97-0.9%1.97.0.47..1.2:t
Elsewhere in Alaska 13.07.16.07-12.4i.15.47.10.3%13.lI.
OIJtside Al.3ska 1.21.2.4Z 1.0%2.0~O.6;~1.47.
B-160
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
Table B.148.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Camping by Area
i
)
II
0 0
780 1760
610 1510
370 H2O
0 0
1984
LOW HIGH
51600 56100
50860 553"60
23980 27850
:1420 3950
6880 S'270
2420 3950
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 63240 67620 61200 65620
In Alask:;l 61310 65720 59600 64040
SIJsi tna St'Jdy Area 29490 33600 28660 32740
Area One 2980 4660 2890 4540
Are.':!Two 8670 11300 8370 10960
Area Ihree 3560 5360 3270 5010
Are.':!Four 0 250 0 250
Area five %0 2020 870 1890
Area Six 960 2020 %0 2020
Are.3 Seven 530 1380 530 1380
Are.':!Eight 0 0 0 0
Area Nine 610 1510 610 1510 530 1390
Area Ten ...O.__._250__...0..~·-··-···-·0---..-··--------0------·.0-.----..---..-..._--.-_..--...__._-_..__.._--~-
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 140 710 140 710 140 710
Area Thirteen 3180 4900 3080 4780 2300 4430
Are.':!FOIJrteen 2320 3840 2320 3840 2050 3480
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1050 2140 %0 2020 780 1760
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 11990 14990 11690 14650 9970 12760
Kenai PeninslJla 15550 18870 15240 18530 13210 16320
Copper R.JWr.3nge11/V.31dez 610 1510 _5~L 1380.._.3'l.0_.__1120._.__
~·----------~----SolJtheast-Al:asKa----·----·-96"(f---2020 --960 2020 450 1250
-------&lsewhere-ir.-Al".3sk.3'-----13820-r6990 r:r:no 16320 10980 13870
QIJtside Alaska 1310 2510 1050 2140 610 1510
I
I)
Table B.149.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Camping by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Ahsk=3 49.9i.54.3%48.57-52.9i.41.57.45.97.
In Alaska 49.2i.53.61.4/'.87-"'1 ')'1 41.0;!45.4:~,J",•.w ...
SIJ·:;Hna St'Jdy Area 30.51.34.7%30.0i.34.07.26113i.30.3i.
Area One 2.37.3.'1%2.3i~3.Sl:~1.'3i.3.3:'
Are.3 Two 9.2k 12.07.9.2i.11.8i.7.87-10.4i.
Area Three 4.9i.6.9%4.77.6.7%4.07.6.0;'
Are.3 FOIJr 0.1i.0.5i.O.li.0.5i.o.lJ.0.5i.
Area Five LSi.'1 '7'/1.5%'1 "1'/1.3;!",COlli.._,Ja .wll'..."'11 ..JI•
I !Are.3 Si:·:1.6!d.Oi.1.67.2.8i.1.2%2.4i.\i Area Seven 0.67-1.67.0.67.1.67.0.6:"1.47.
Are.3 Eight O.D:0.57-O.li.O.5X o.lI.0.5i.
Area Nine 0.3:'0.9i.0.37.0.97.O.2k 0.8i.
Are=3 ren .0%0.2%.Oi.0.2i:~~O.2i..V/.
Are.:!Eleven 0'/0.2i-II Oi~O.2;!.Ok O.2~{...
Area Twelve .Oi.O.2~.01.0.2i..07.f\'1'"
'lot II yte
Area Thirteen 2.7%4.3i.'1 '7'/4.37.2.6Z 4.&j~oW II i J.
Are.3 FOlJrteen 1.6i.2.8k 1.57.2.71.1.5;'~.j "'pv,;,J.I 1.'-
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.3i.l.li.0.3i.1.Ii!11 ':!'!l.l~~\oj'.'-oJI.
Anchorage/ChlJgach Mtn.Are.3 1.97-3.37-1.87.3.27-1.3k :"",C"I/
.:;.II .J/.
~{enai PeninslJla 5.37-7.57.5.2%7.4%4.67-6.67.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 4.8i.G.87.4.87-6.8i.4.0i.f).0j;
SOlJtheast Alaska 0.27-0.87-0.27-0.8i.O.lI.o '/./.!i.
Elsewhere in Al.:!sk=3 11.8%14.8%11.27-14.2i.9.37.12.U
OlJtside Alaska 0.37-1.1i.0.3X 1.1k 0.3i.o.n
I \LJ
B-162
Table B.150.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Camping by Area
Are.3 Eleven 0 30
Area Twelve 030
Area thirteen 370 600
Area Fourteen 220 390
10 Miles North of Den~li Hwy 50 150
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 260 460
f{enai Peninsula 740 1040
--.---------------·Copper-R-JWr··.'3o'je HN'31dez-----660----950-----
I
I
.I
1
1984
LOW HIGH
5760 6370
5690 6300
3650 4200
260 460
1090 1440
560 830
10 70
ISO 350
170 33()
80 200
10 70
o :30
o 30
o 30
360 580
200 380
5CI 150
180 350
640 920
---51j~O--~8"3C
'
"--.-"---.-,----.--,-.-
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
6730 7340
6630 7240
4160 4730
320 540
1270 1640
650 930
10 70
200 380
220 390
90 220
10 70
o 30
o 30
o 30
370 600
200 380
50 150
250 440
730 1020
-bW--·--950····
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER
LOW HIGH
6930 .7530
6830 7440
4240 4810
320 540
1280 1660
680 960
10 70
200 380
230 410
'30 220
10 70
40 130
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alaska
SIJsi to:;}St'Jdy Are.'3
Are~One
Are.'3 Two
Area Three
Are.'3 tOIJr
Are.3 Five
Are.'3 Si:<
Are~Seven
Are.3 Ei'3ht
Area Nine
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Elsewhere in Al~sk~
OIJtside Alaska
1640
50
2050
150
1560
50
1970
150
1300
40
1670
130 !
)
I
I
1
I
Table B.151.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Camping by Area
!III RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985-1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of A1ask.'3 62.7i.68.9%57.6~64.0~48.67.CC'"11'".loJ ai.J}"
In Al.:!ska G2.2k G8.4X 57.1%(iii t:Uf 40 '"J"/55.3Z",j.U/._u.i I.
Susitna Study Area 43.9i.50.5i.41.9%48.5%l\l:ClU 4''=1'1.J.J •.;I.'''In
Area One 3.3i.G.l7.3.2%G.07-2.1~4.57.
Area Two 14.3i.19.37.14.2;'19.2:'12.7'1.17.5%
Area Three G.3i.9.9;{;G.2~':J.87.5.5k 3.':J;~
Area Pour 0.07.0.5i.0.07.O.5;~O.O~0.57.
Are·:!Five .'1.4~~3.4i.1.47.3.47.1.27-3.2/~
II Are.:!Si:-;1.0i.2.8t.1.0i:2.8%O.7~-,fJ'''';".'\01,.
II Area Seven 0.6i.2.21.0.6%-1 "",'C'.37.1.7~~",.Wl.
Area lH9ht 0.0i.0.0i.O.Oj~0.0i.0.01.0.07.
Are.:!Nine'1.2%3.07.0.37.1.77-O.2~1.27-
Are.:!Ten 0.0r.o.n 0.0r.o.n 0.07.o.7;'~
Area Eleven 0.0i.0.0r.0.0r.0.07-0.07.O.O?
Are.'3 Twelve 0.07.0.5i-0.0r.0.57.0.07.0.51.
Area Thirteen 4.37.7.5%3.97-6.9%3.6i.6.47-
Are.:!Fourteen 1.2%3.07.1.2X 3.07.1.07.2.8%
10 Miles North of Denali Hw':!0.97.2.77-0.87.2.47.0.77.:1.3~
Anchor age/Chu'3-:!ch Mtn.Are·;s 2.17.4.5i.2.01.4.41.2.0i.4.2~
Kenai Peninsula 4.47.7.67.3.97.6.97.3.07.5.8k
Copper R./Wraoge11/Va1dez 3.17-5.97-1.97.4.1i.1.67-3.87.
Southeast Alaska 0.4%1.3i.0.4i.1.87.0.4i.loB:!
E1-~ewhere in Al.:!sk.'3 13.3%18.1%11.5i.16.1i.8.9i,13.17.
Outside Alaska 0.1i.1.1%0.11.1.1%.07-1.0Z
B-164
Table B.l52.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Camping by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
'\
I
1984
LOW HIGH
1290 1470
1300 1470
940 1110
60 120
340 460
150 240
o 10
30 80
20 60
10 40
o 0
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
1530 1700
1520 1690
1120 1290
90 160
380 510
170 260
o 10
40 90
30 70
20 60
o 0
HIGH
1830
1820
1340
160
510
260
10
90
70
60
o
EVER
LOW
1670
1650
1170
90
380
170
o
40
30
20
o
30
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Alaska
In Alaska
':liE i.tn.3 Study Area
Ar~.3 One
Are.3 Two
Area Three
Are.'3 tOIJr
Area Five
Are.3 Sh:
Area Seven
Are::!Eight
Area Nine
o 20 0 20 0 20
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 0 10 0 10 0 10
Area Thirteen 120 200 100 130 90 170
Area fOIJrteen 30 80 30 80 :30 70
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 20 70 20 60 20 bO
Anchor.'3'je/Gh IJ'jach Mtrlc Area 60 120 50 120 50 110
Kenai Peninsula 120 200 100 130 80 150
.',-,·_·_~·_·__··_---GQPper-·R·.-IWr~'3n'jeH-IValdez"···-··":--80·-·"·--·160--"--·"--"'50-'--lTO-"~'"·--40---TO·O....·_-_·_·_~···_······
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
350
o
480
30
310
o
430
30
240
o
350
30 'j
)
)
I
I
I
Table B.153.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage of
All Households Hiking,Picnicking,or Berry Picking
By Area
\i ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1934
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Al.:lsk.:;;76.4i.78.8i.75.4:;7"n ....71.37.73.7%1.0/.
In Alash 7502%77.67-74.3;~76.7i.70.5~~?2.r~k
Susitna Study Area 38.n 41.51.38.1%40.97.34.G;~'}'7 '1Uf
'..1;Iw/_
Area One 3.57-4 C"I 3.47.4.47.3.17-4.1i..,.u.
Area Two 11.2i.13.07.11.07.12.87.10.27-12.Oi~
Are.:!Three 7112~8.61.7.07.8.47-6.3i~'7 ','JJIii_
Area Four 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07-
Area Five 1.4~!.,z)'Y 1.37.2.1;~1.2%1.87-........".
Area Sb:1.97.2.7%1 q'J ')'1'1 1,Gi~2.4Z•.II.~.II•
Area Seven 0.77-1.3i.O.7i~1.37-0.6i.1.07.
Are.:!Eight .0%0.2i..Oi.O.2i~.07.O.2i.
Area Nine 0.4i.O.Bi.0.47.0.87.O.3Z O.7~~
Are.:.Ten .Oi.0.27-.Oi.0.27-.07.0.21.
Area Eleven 0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.O.Oi;O.O~1.
Are.:!Twelve 0.1i.0.5i.0.17.0.57.0.17.0.5?
Area Thirteen 3.4i~4.47.3.47-4 ;i'/J).iiI'4 '1'1....\Ja £./•a.i.l/.
Are.:!Fourteen 4.6i.5.8k 4.6i.5.87.4.17.l:"'1 1l
.J ,-.JI.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.37.1.97.1.37-1.9%1.27-,Oil
J.II I.JllI
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are.:!18.4i.20.67-18.37-20.57-17.41.19.67.
f(enai Peninsula 15.07.17.07.14.9i.16.97.14.07.16.0i.
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez l.n:2.57-1.6i.2.4i~1.4i.2.2X
SOIJtheast Alaska 0.8~1.47-0.77-1 ")~I iJ.7%1.37.
,(
....".
Elsewhere in Alaska 17.67.19.87.17.2i.19.4X 16.47.18.6%[i OIJtside Alaska 1.1i.1.77.1.07-1.67.0.7%1.3;'
\1 '_J
U
B-166
Table B.154.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Hiking,Picnick'ing,or Berry Picking
By Area
)
1
1
)
I
I
l
l
':~
J
1
I
\
1
I
I
I
I
I
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
92590 95470 87480 90510
91220 94140 86480 89540
46830 50150 42440 45700
4130 5450 3790 5050
13510 15710 12560 14690
8550 10360 7730 9460
0 0 0 0
1650 2530 1430 2250
2310 3330 1980 2930
890 1570 680 1280
EVERGEOGRAPHICLOCATION
LOW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~93840 96670
In A1~sk~92340 95230
SIJsi tn.3 St'Jdy Are.:!47560 50890
Are~One 4240 5580
Area Two 13750 15960
Area Three 8780 10610
Are.:!tOIJf'0 0
Are~Five 1760 2660
Area Six 2310 3330
Area Seven 890 1570
Are.:!Eight 20 230 20 _~230 ~20 __.__230-~-------
I,------------------AArree.:r1fe1nr,e -----~----4?.1.00 -1~~00 470 1000 370 850
•-.:.~20 230 20 230
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Twelve 180 550 180 550 180 550
Area Thirteen 4130 5450 4130 5450 3900 5180
Are.:!Fourteen 5630 7140 5630 7140 5050 6490
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1540 2390 1540 2390 1430 2250
Anchor~ge/ChIJ9ach Mtn.Area 22590 25280 22470 25160 21390 24030
---------------------f{enai-PeninslJla~-----------------l8400--~20890---------18280------20760--------r7:W-O--PJ6:JO----
Cop'p_e.LR.LWr-,3n'ae.llLV~11dez 20-90--3060 1-980--2930 17&0--266""0---
Southeast A1.3sk.3 1000 1700 890 1570 890 1570
Elsewhere in Al.3ska 21630 24280 21150 23780 20190 22770
OIJtside Alaska 1320 2120 1210 1980 890 1570
Table B.155.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage of
Urban Households Hiking,Picnicking,or Berry Picking
by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 76.8~80.2~75.77-79.3~71.5i.M,f:'.'/
\)
i·J.~11l
In Alaska 75.4%79.0%74.5%MQ 1'\'70.7'1.74.57-/1..1I.fa
SIJsi tn:a Study Area 36.4i.40.6i.35.8~40.07.:32.li.~3fj Il~
Area One 3.U 4.n 3.17-4.77.2.8%4.47.
Area Two 9.8~12.4Z 9.6i.1'1 '~"I 8.87.11.4i:'a ....I.
Area Three 6.37-8.5%6.U 8.31:C'c:'"ry 7"/oJ •.J/.I II i ill
Are.3 tour O.O~0.07.0.0i.0.01.0.01.0.07.
Area five 1.2%2.27-1.Ii.2.1~0.9%1.9f.
Are.3 Sil-:1.8i.3.0i.1 "'1 .-;,QOII 1.4i:.").''''•il,~Il.:i•...b;.
Area Seven 0.6~1.4%0.6%1.41.0.4k 1 'l'\'...."'1.
Are::!Eight 0.0%0.0i.0.0i.0.0i.O.Oi.0.01.
Are·3 Mine 0.3i.0.9i.0.37-0.9%0.2%0.8;'
Are::!len .Oi.0.21..07.0.27..01.0.27-
Are::!Eleven 0.0i.0.07.0.0%0.07.0.0i:0.0i.
Il Are::!Twelve O.li.0.5i.0.17.0.5,O.li.r.t:"ll.'
t}•.J/.
Area Thirteen 3.17.4 '1'/3.1i.4.77.2.9~4.57.L_--J .J B
Are.3 Fourteen 4.2i.6.07-4.2i.6.0i.3.67.5.47.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.2%2.2%1 'J'f 21127-1.0i.2.01..UB
Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 20.2i.23.87.20.0i.23.67-19.17."'1 C"I/ww •.J'a
Kenai Peninsul..i 16.07.19.2%15.9i.19.17.14.9:1.18X~
Copper R./Wrangel1/Valdez 0.97.1.9i.0.87.1.8i.O.7i.1 C:".,,)/,
Southeast Alaska 0.7i.1.5%0.7i.1.57-0.6%1.4%
Elsewhere in Ahsk.3 17.57.20.97.17.0i.20.47.16.3i.19.5;~
Outside Alaska 1.0%2.0i.l.O:~2.07.0.77.1.57.
II"_.J
B-168
Table.B.156.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Hiking,Picnicking,or Berry Picking
by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInorOIJtofAlask:;l 81530 85230 80440 84200 75970 79950InAlaska80110838907913082%0 75100 7';H20SusitnaStudyAre.:l 38700 43080 38070 42440 34090 38350Are:~One 3270 5010 3270 5010 2980 4660Are.:!Two 10380 13200 10170 12980 9370 12080Are.:!Three 6680 9040 6480 8810 5890 8130Are.:!tOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.;!five 1220 2390 1130 3260 960 202()·Are.:!Si:<1860 3240 1770 3120 1490 2750Are.;!Seven 610 1510 610 1510 450 !""{\...';vAre.:!Ei'31lt 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaNine290980290930210850Are.:!Ten 0 250 (:250
----~_..__._--__0___250-----.0-_._-._---Al'ea--Eleven~-------------------,---~-T '---"-·0--0 0 0Are.:!Twe 1ve 70 560 70 560 70 %0AreaThirteen327050103270501030804780Are.;!tOIJrteen 4430 6410 4430 6410 3850 571010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy122023901220239010502140Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 21500 25230 21300 25010 20270 23920RenaiPeninslJla169802041016880203001585019200CopperR./Wrangel1/Valdez 960 2020 .870 1890 700 1640SoutheastAlaska--------700 --1640---------100----16'40---~-----610--~r510-.-..".__..._-"-"-_.__._._"-.....-.~_...---------,------_.-----.-.
Elsewhere in Alaska 1862.0_22110 181-10----2-1620 1-7290-201JfOOutsideAlaska10502140105021407001640
B-169
)
I
)
I
I
i
)
i
)
J
I
·1
i
!
1
!
fl
I I
1-\of
[I
I I
Table B.IS7.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
Small Town Households Hiking,Picnicking,or
Berry Picking by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
EVER
LOW HIGH
67.37.71.37.
66.87.70.87-
45.07.50.07-
3.n 4.,7i.
15.87.19.21.
9.4;'12.27.
O.OX Q.O;~
1\.....,
V.wi.
0.07.
0.47.
3.47.
0,2%
2.4i~
11l4~
O.S;{
6.5%
66.5;(
47.2i.
4.57.
1.Ii.
4.7:'
6.67.
7.9~!
O.8i~
15.97-
O.7k
11.37.
O.O;~
HIGH
11184
3.1i.
8 ',./
I'll
0.07.
1.57-
1.21.
LOU
5.7%
0.2:'
4.67.
0.3%
o.o~
.Ok
2.0:t
4.5X
O.3i.
0.1%
12.91.
52.7%
62.3%
42.8;:~
0.3%1.1%
.07.O.2~
5.O~~7.0;1.
O.2Z O.8k
9.37.12.1:'
0.07.O.Oi;
1.61.2.8;'
1.27.2.41.
0.0;'1.47.
0.07.0.0;'
.Oi:0.41.
2.27.3.6;~
4.61.6.67.
0.37.1.17.
3.2i.5.07.
45.27.49.67-
3.1%4.n
6.17.8.31.
0.2%0.87-
14.17.17.31.
15.7;~19.1i~
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
67.07.7l.0;~
7.07.
1.4i.
0.87-
1.17.
0.27.
0.07.
0.47.
3.67.
6.67-
I.D:
0.97.
17.37.
0.87.
4.67.
0.37.
1.2Z
3.2%
2.2%
0.2%
.07.
0.07.
.01.
0.3%
0.67-
0.27.
5.0i.
6.1i.
0.37.
14.1%
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alaska
Susitna Study Area
Are.:!One
Area Two
Area Three
Area Pour
Area five
Area Sil-:
Area Seven
Are·3 Eight
Area Nine
Are.:!Ten
Area Eleven
Are.:!Twelve
Area Thirteen
Are.:!tOIJrteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchor.3ge/Ch 'J'jach Mtn.Area
Ken'3i Peninsula
Copper R./Wrangell/Vaidez
Southeast Alaska
Elsewhere in Al~sk~
Outside Alaska
I
i
\
u
B-170
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
Table B.158.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Hiking,Picnicking,or
Berry Picking by Area
)
I
I
1
I
i
)
I
J
I
I
l
i
I
I
I
I
l
o
no
330
200
380
900
150
9230
9280
6550
630
2520
1570
2210
90
1984
HIGH
1780
20
2400
110
1960
30
2400
no
1960
30
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
In or OIJt of Al.3sk.3 9340 9900 9290 9860 8700
In Al.:!ska 9270 9830 9220 9790 8650
Susitna StlJdy Are.:!6330 6940 6270 6880 5940
Are.3 One 420 660 420 660 400
Are.:!Two 2200 2660 2180 2650 2060
Area Three 1310 1690 1300 1670 1210
Are-3 four 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 five 220 390 220 390 200
Are.3 Si;.:170 330 170 330 170
Area Seven 30 200 80 200 80
Are.:!Eight 30 no 30 llO 30
Are·:!Nine 50 150 50 __150 ~~50 .150____
·--·~·-·--~---~-Ate.3~Terl--~---~-~---O-~----------~-o--30 0 30
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Twelve 0 50 0 50 0 50
Area Thirteen 300 500 300 500 280 470
Are.3 fOIJrteen 640 920 640 920 620
10 Miles North of [Ienali Hwy 50 150 50 150 50
Anchorage/Ch'Jgach Mtn.Are·3 450 690 450 690 420
.{enai Peninsula 690 980 690 980 640 920
---..-----.-----~---.-~-Copper--R .IWr.3ngell!Valdez----~---840------H60-~-------~--840-~---n60~--------79-0--n 00---
IIiI
IIIj
u
Table B.159.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Hiking,Picnicking,or
Berry Picking by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or out of Alaska 80.1!85.1!78.4!83.&1.73.1i.70 ?-.!
I oj.'"
In Al.:lska 79.67.84.6i~78.0i.83.2%72.87-78.47-
Susitn::!Study Area &2.5!&8.77.61.0!67.47.57.07-6:3.4;~
Are::!One 4.5!'l 'l'f 4.41.7.67.4.2i~7.2:~I •J nJ
Area Two 20.77.26.37.20.7'7.26.31.20.01.25.6i~
Area Three 10.17.14.5i.9.37-13.57.n ""1 'j ?/o.i I.....\,1.I ,I,
Are·:l EOIJr 0.0r.0.01.0.0i.0.07.o.Oi~0.01.
Area five 1.7%3.97-1.7;~3.9/.1.7;~Ii Q"I...,•.zIt
Are.:l Si>:1.77.3.97.1.6/.'""1 0'"1.41."1 .\'7.,)aul.'oJ.~/•
Area Seven 1.4i.3.47.1 'j'/3 '-,,/1.07.2.8%.~~a,,;..h
Are.:l Ei9ht 0.0r.0.07.0.01.O.Oi:0.01.0.0i.
Area Nine O.3i~1.57.O.3i~1.5;'o ')'1 1.47.aWl.
Are.:l Ten 0.07.0.57.0.07.0.5;~o ij'!0.57.,VI.
Area Eleven 0.0i.0.07.0.0r.0.01.i).OJ,().Oi~
Area Twelve •Or.1.07..Oi.1.07.•Oj~1.0i.
Are·:l Thirteen 5.97.9.37.5.97.9.37.c;'11"galA:J.ll.
Are.:l Fourteen 3.8!6.87."1 O'f b.Sk 1'"1 r::-,G.3;~oJ ,',,11..j ...Ji.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.8!2.6%0.87.2.67.0.87-2.67-
Anchor .:lge/Ch'Jgach Mtn.Area ")")~4.67.2.07.4.47.1.3%4.0;~a:.au/.
Kenai Peninsula 2.7%5.37.'1 I:'f 5.17-"I:~4 q'f....'lo1/a ~.,J/••J~
Copper R./Wr~ngell/Valdez 3.4i.6 .),/:3.47-G.2i.2.97-5.5"•w,.
Southe~st Alaska 0.51.1.9!0.57.1.91.o.5j~1.97-
Elsewhere in Alaska 14.41.19.47.14.17-19.17-12.07.16.67.
Outside Alaska 0.07-0.77.0.07-0.7%0.0;'O.7~
B-172
l
I
I
I
I
I
-:"')
J
20
50
440
10
320
o
510
20
380
o
520
20
380
o
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Elsewhere in Alaska
OlJtside Alaska
Table B.160.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Hiking,Picnicking,or Berry Picking
by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OlJt of Alask:a 2130 2260 2090 2220 1940 2090
In Alaska 2120 2250 2070 2210 1940 2090
SIJsi tn.3 StlJdy Are.3 1660 1830 1620 1790 1520 1690
Area One 120 200 120 200 110 190
Are.3 Two 550 700 550 700 530 ..680
Area Three 270 380 250 360 230 340
Area FOlJr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Five 50 100 50 100 50 100
Are.3 Sb:50 100 40 100 40 90
Area Seven 40 90 30 80 30 70
Area Ei'3ht 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Nine ~-~~~__-~_~_~__~lO~_-~-40-~---~~--10---~-~40--~--~--10--~-.4-0-~~-_.-~.-..----.-.---..-~-Area Ten 0 10 0 10 0 10
Are.3 Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Twelve 0 30 0 30 0 30
Area Thirteen 160 250 160 250 150 240
Are.3 FOlJrteen 100 180 100 180 90 170
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 20 70 20 70 20 70
Anchor.3ge/ChIJ9·3Ch Mtn.Are.3 60 120 50 120 50 no
Kenai PeninslJIa 70 140 Z.Q_.__130 --~----~.20-c----130---~-----..-·--~---·-·_-----·-Gopper-R./Wr.3ngeI-1jV.31dez---·------·90--~--.....r7~-----~·170
Table B.161.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of All Households Sightseeing by Area
~~I
I
J
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
4.5~5.77.
.01.O.2k
3.bk 4.Bi~
4.27.5.47.
o.:3k O.7i~
0.67.1.0%
.07.0.27.
0.07.0.07.
1984
LOW HIGH
1.5i~2.3%
2.:j'::'::'.'t;!
0.07.0.07.
1.3;!2.1i.
20.47.22.67.
17.67.19.Bi.
2.3;>;3.lI.
11.7i:13.57.
8.5i~lO.l!
1.6;~2.4i~
14.2~16.2i~
77.07.79.2i.
44.17.4&.97.
3.5i.
'1 '1'1.w •..".
0.2i.
O.8i~
5.0k
5.6i:
0.07.
0.~7.
1.2:'<:
2.5i~
23.77-
1.O;~
82.0%
50.67.
6.3%
14.3i.
10.81.
0.07.
2.57-
16.9i:
20.37-
3.47.
.o;~
2.57.
1.71.
0.0i:
0.67-
.07.
0.07.
0.47.
3.87.
4.47.
1.77.
47.87.
12.5i.
79.S;~
14.97.
18.17.
2.47-
1.47.
21.37.
0.6i.
1980 -1985
LOW HIGH
80.21.82.4i.
0.07.
0.87.5.n
5.67.
0.2%
0.27-
1.27.
51.4i.
6.47.
14.47-
11.07.
0.07-
2.67.
83.47.
82.S;{
20.4%
3.57.
2.27.
24.17.
1.07.
17.07.
2.67.
l.tj~
EVER
LOW HIGH
12.67.
9.4%
0.0i.
1.87.
81.2%
80.6i:
48.Gi.
5.2Z
.Oi.
0.6~
.07.
0.0i.
0.47.
3.97.
4.47-
1.77.
15.0;~
18.2%
2.5i.
1.47-
21.7'1.
0.67.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
In or out of Al~sk~
In Alask.~
Susitn~Study Area
Area One
Area Two
Area Three
Area Four
Area Five
Are.~Si:<
Are.~Sever,
Are.-a Eight
Area Nine
Area Ten
Are.~Eleven
Are.-a Twelve
Area Thirteen
Area tOIJrteen
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy
Anchor ·~ge/ChlJ'3.-ach Mtn.Area
f{enai Peninsula
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez
Southeast Alaska
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alaska
II
\1
B-174
)
I
I
I
I
I
tt¥j
"....".
j
~-1
I
l
j
1
.r
.1
I
I
I
!
B-175
Table B.162.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
All Households Sightseeing by Area
ALL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1'380 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoroutofAlaska99730102320984701011209472097520InAlaska9898010160097970100640944709?280SlJsitnaStudyArea596806308058700620905416057540AreaOne633079106210778055107010Are.3 Two 15410 17730 15290 17610 14340 16590AreaThree1149013~5C 11260 13290 10430 12400Are.3 FOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0Areafive220032002090306018702800Are.3 Sb:3220 4390 3100 4260 2760 3860AreaSeven1980293017602&60 1540 2390Are.3 Eight 20 230 20 230 20 230Are.3 Nine 780 1430 780 1430 680 1280
Are.a Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 0Are.3 Twelve 470 1000 470 1000 370 850AreaThirteen482062304700610044?O 5840Are::!Fourteen 5400 6880 5400 6880 5170 662010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy20903060209030601980'Jq'Jii
"oIo,J 1,1'Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Are.3 18400 20890 18280 20760 17440 19880f{en.3i Peninsul.3 22350 25030 22230 24910 21630 24280CopperR./Wrangel1/Valdez 3100 4260 2990 _____4130 ._.______2t60.____-3860-_____._--·--··-----·-----·----Southe.3st-At3sl(~--·-------·········---··--1760-·--2660-1760 2660 1650 2530E{sewhere-in-Al~ska 26680-29540 26200 29040 25000 27790OutsideAlask.3 680 1280 680 1280 580 1140
Table B.163.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Urban Households Sightseeing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
lj GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
I]
In or OlJt at A1ask.:!81.87.85.07-80.6i.83.8i.77.Gi.81.07.
In Alaska al.l!84.37-SO.li.83.37."r"'J liS!80.7i.f I :a.Ji.
SlJsitna StlJdy Area 47.n 51.37-46.3i.50.5j~42.41.'lEi.Gi.
[i Area One 4.6;'6.67.4.57-6.5i.4.17-i:'q'/__I'.IJI
II Are.:!Two 11.2i.14.0i.11.27-14.07.10.47.13.2%
Area Three s.n 11.37-8.5%ll.l;~7.97.10.31.
Are.:!FOlJr 0.07.0.0;'0.07.0.01.0.07.O.O;~
[j Are·:!Five 1.6;'2.3%.l.57.t'}1'"11/1.37.:'ll:""
WI/i....i .oJ/.
Are.:!Si:-:2.4i.3.8i.'i ')'/')'7'/2.01.3.47.",.'.ll.w.I,.
Area Seven 1.47-2.67-1.37.1"1 C'I 1.H 2.1;~.:..\;,.
Area Eight 0.0i.0.07-0.01.0.07-0.07.0.07.
Are·3 Nine 0.5i.1.37-0.57.1.3~0.47.1 ':1'1."J.
Are.3 Ten .Oi.0.27..01.o "'/.Oi.0.2i.awl.
Area Eleven 0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.0%0.01.
Area Twelve 0.37.0.9i.0.3i.0.97.0.31.0.91.
Area Thirteen 3.n:5.5!·1 r].!5.5%3.47.c:'11 J1/
WIJ i.oJ.wi,
Area FOlJrteen 4.2i.6.0f.4.27.6.07.4.07.5.87.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1.7~2.97.1.7~'1 q'!1.6i~.,iJlJ.f....~J.~.\,.'i•
Anchor age/ChlJg.3Ch Mtn.Area 16.3i.19.5;'16.27.19.47.15.47.18.61.
Kenai PerdnslJl.3 19.37.22.7%1'3.n l"'1'11:"'1 18.57.21.9~".....".1,.
Capper R./Wrangel1/Valdez 1.8i.3.0%1.6i.2.8k LSi.2.71.
Southeast Alaska 1.4i.2.6k 1.41.2.6%1.37.2.5%
Elsewhere in Alaska 20.77-24.31.20.3i.23.9i.10 f:'{22.9!'"J a .J/a
I I OIJtside Alask.:i 0.57.1.37.0.41.1.27.0113%1.ii~
ILJ
[j
U
B-176
)
l
I
I
I
I
j
i
~I
I
!
I
1
i
)
1
I
I
I
B-l77
Table B.164.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Urban Households Sightseeing by Area
URBAN HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHInoro~t of Alask~86910 90260 85590 89030 82400 86050InAl.3Sk.3 8G140 89540 85040 88520 82030 85740SusitnaStudyArea500105451049160536604503049500AreaOne49106980482068704330b290Are.3 Two 11890 14880 11890 14880 11080 13990AreaThree927011970907011750837010':)&0Are."FOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaFive168030001530288014002630Are."Sil-:2510 4070 2420 3950 2140 3600AreaSeven1490275014002&30 1130 22&0AreaEight000000AreaNine53013805301380450..'(J'250 0 250Are.3 Eleven 0 0 0 0 0 1\vAreaTwelve290980290980290980Are."Thirteen 3940 5830 3940 5830 3650 5480Are·3 Fourteen 4430 GUO 4430 6410 4230 6180.10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 1770 3120 1770 3120 1680 3000Anchorage/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 17290 20740 17180 20630 16370 19750Ken.3i Penins~1.3 20470 24140 20270 23920 19650 23260CopperR./Wr.:lngell/V.31dez _____18GO____32AO.1680--3000 1580--2880~..~-----------So~theast Alaska
22020 25780 21610 25340 20680 24360OutsideAlask.3 530 1380 450 1250 3'7;'\1120.I'"
(
II I
I
[I
Table B.165.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Small Town Households Sightseeing by Area
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
11
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or QIJt of Al.3sk:~73.4i.77.27-73.1i.76.9i.69.8i.73.8Z
In Alask:;\73.2%77.0%73.07.76.a;!69.7i.73.7X
S~sitna Study Area 51.2k 55.6%51.0i.55.4%48.51.52.9i.
Area One 5.5%'1 '1'¥5115'7-7.77.5.1~7.37-I •J ,.
Area TWD 16.31.19.7%16.37-19.77.'co 1"1"1 1':).1i~loJ.l J.
[]Area Three 10.3;!13.Ii;lO.2i~13.07.9.97-1 J'),,',....w./1,
Are:~Fo~r 0.07-0.0i.0.0i.0.07-0.0i.O.O~
Are.3 Five 1.4;!2.6%1.47.2.6i.1.47.2.67-
Area Si:·:2.57-4.17-2.57.4.1i;'1 '1'/3.6;~".w/.
Area Seven 1.Ii:2.3%1.1;'2.37.O.9~1.91.
Area Eight 0.3i.0.9%0.3i.0.97.O.3i~0.9i:
Area Nine 0.6i.1.47.0.67.1.4i.o 1:'/1 ~'/
(I
•J'".,j/•
Are.';j Ten .Oi.0.27..Oi.0.2%.Oi.o ')'1,w/a
Area Eleven 0.0%O.O:~0.0i.0.07.0.07-0.07.
Are.':I Twelve O.l!o.n 0.17-O.7i~O.lX o COl'.oJ/.
Area Thirteen 2.0i.3.4%2.07.3.4i.1.8i.'J 1")1'
\J •.wi,
Area FOIJrteen 3.47.5.2%3.47.5.2%3.3~5.1/.
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 0.57-1.37.0.5;'1.37.0.57.1.3~
Anchora'je/Ch~gach Mtn.Area 3.17-4.7i.3.11.4.77.....,0'/4.4i~WIJ,J/I
~(enai PeninslJla B.D:10.n:3.17.10.7:"7.8~10.47.
Copper R./Wran'jell/Valdez 6.8i.9.2i.6.77.9.1i.6.4i.8.8!.
Soytheast Alaska 0.27-0.8k o ")"0.8%0.2%0.8;'I awl.
I Elsewhere in Alaska 23.l!26.9i.23.17-26.91.21.61.25.41.
U O~tside Alaska 0.21.0.8%0.2%0.87.0.2,0.87-
U
IJ
[J
B-178
SMALL TOWN HOUSEHOLDS
J
i 1
-J
I
I
I
~'l
I I
.]
I
)
I
I
)
J
j
I
I
.J
o 30
o I)
10 70
250 440
710
1984
10W HIGH
9690 10240
'3680 10220
6730 7:340
710 uno
2180 2650
1380 1760
o {)
190 360
300 500
120 270
40 13i)
3000 3520
30 110
3730
110
3210
30
3730
110
B-179
3210
30
Elsewhere in Alaska
Outside Alask.3
Table B.166.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Small Town Households Sightseeing by Area
GEOGRAPH Ie LOCAT ION EVER 1980 -1985
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
In or OIJt of Ahska 10190 10710 10140 10670
In Al.3sk.3 10160 10690 10130 10660
SIJsi tna St'Jdy Are:~7110 7710 7080 7690
Area One 760 1070 760 1070
Are.:!Two 2260 2730 2260 2730
Are.3 Three 1430 1820 1410 1300
Are.:!FOfJr 0 0 0 0
Area Five 190 360 190 360
Area Sb:350 570 350 570
Are.3 Seven 160 310 160 310
Area Eight 40 130 40 130
Area Nine 8_0_200__80 .200
----Arei 'Cen .....0 30 0 30
Area Eleven 0 0 0 0
Are.3 Twelve 20 90 20 90
Area Tilirteen 280 470 280 470
Are.3 FOIJrteen 470 no 470 no
10 Miles North of Denali Hwy 70 180 70 180
Anchor.3g e/C h'Jg.3ch Min.Are.3 420 660 420 660
f(enai Peninsul:3 1130 1480 1130 -..:!1~48~0,--__---,,~,---_
--Gopper-R./Wr.3ngell1V.llde·z·-----·-940---···12S-0·---9'30 1260
n
I_J
U
lJ
Table B.l67.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Percentage
of Rural Households Sightseeing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH l.OW HIGH
In or out of Al~sk~75.4%80.8~75.21.80.6i.70.0i.75.B7.
In Alaska 74.5%80.17-74.37-79.9%69.n "1:'r::1S,!,-,.,J!.
Susi tn.:!Study Are~57.5%63.9%57.47-63.87.53.4i.60.01.
Area One 5.37-8a7%C'J'111,3.6i;5.0%8.27.,J •..:i:i.
Are.:!Two 19.07-24.47-19.0%24.41.lB.ijk 24.01.
Are~Three 7.6X 11.4:1:7.6~11.4%6.7%·10.3;;
Area FOIJr 0.01.0.01.0.07.0.07-0.0%0.07-
Are.:!Five 11l7k 3.97.1.77.3.97-1.G;!3.b?
Are.:!Si:<2.0i.4.41.2.07-4.47-2.0%4.4i.
Area Seven 0.87.2.67.0.3!2.6Z o 0'/2.61.aUn
Are.:!Eight 0.0%'0.07.0.0i.0.07-a.Oi:0.01.
Area Nine 0.37-1.5%0.31.1.5i.0.3%1.5%
Are::i Ten 0.0i:0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.0.07.
Area Eleven 0.0%0.0r.0.07.0.07-o ,''f 0.0;'.:.iJa
Area Twelve 0.3i.1.5%0.31.1.5i~.01.O.8i:
Are.3 Thirteen 5.5%8.9%5.5!8.97.5.1i.8 ')'/1"';1.
Area FOIJrteen 3.01.5.61.3.01.5.6i~3.01.5.61.
10 Miles North af Denali Hwy 0.9i.2.7%0.9%'1 "'/o.n 2.37.i,jlli.
Anchorage/Chu9~ch Mtn.Area 2.3i:4.7i.2.3X 4.n '1 '-i'/4.6%waw/'
Kenai Peninsul.3 4.37.7.57-4.37.7.57-4.0%7.0%
Copper R./Wrangell/Valdez 1.8%4.0%1.87.4.0%1.77-3.9%
Southeast Al~ska 0.6%2.0%0.67.2.0%0.67.?fl'l....una
Elsewhere in Alaska 24.17-29.9%24.01.29.8%2i.4%27.0%
Outside Alaska .07-0.87..07.0.8r..O~0.81.
B-l80
Table B.168.
Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Number of
Rural Households Sightseeing by Area
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION EVER 1980 -1985 1984LOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW HIGHInoroutofAl~sk~2000 2150 2000 2140 1860 2020InAlask.3 1980 2130 1980 2120 1850 2010SusitnaStudyArea153017001530170014201600AreaOne140230140230130220Are.:!Two 500 650 500 650 490 640Arealhree2003002003001802?OAre.:!FOIJr 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaFive501005010040100Are;~Sil-:50 120 50 120 50 120Are.3 Seven 20 70 20 70 20 ?OAre;~Eight
.?ifeaNine-10 40 10 40 10 40Are.3 len 0 0 0 0 0 0AreaEleven000000Are.3 Twe 1ve 10 40 10 40 0 20Arealhirteen1502401502401301j'.1{;
......vAre.:!FOIJrteen 80 150 80 150 80 15010MilesNorthofDenaliHwy207020702060Anchorage/Chugach Mtn.Area 60 130 60 130 ~~-----l::tQ ...__..----~-·---·----·..·-----f(en.31-Penins'Jh··-------·-..---120·..20ir-···-·---·T2(r--"-266 110 190Copper-R./.Wr~3ngel-l/Valdez 50--1-10 50 11'0 50 100SoutheastAlaska105010501050ElsewhereinAl~ska 640 800 640 790 570 720OIJtsideAlask.3 0 20 0 20 0 20
B-18l
I-j
)
1
J
)
I
I j
)
.j
j
I
I
I
-I
I
1
j