HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPA2968Report by
Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture
Prepared for
Alaska Power Authority
1
1
3.2.1
3.2.2
3o2e3
3e2e4
3.2.5
4. 1 BACKGROUND
4. 2 STUDY RESULTS
s
4$2.1 Demographic Characteristics
4.2.2 Economic Characteristics
4.2.3 Housing Characteristics
tes
terns
4.2.4 idence and Settlement Patterns
ilit
4.2.5 Res ' Attitudes about Public Facilit
Services and Community Change
5 • 1 BACKGROUND
5. 2 STUDY RESULTS
5.2.1
5.,2.2
5.2.3
5lt2.4
5.2.5 i 1 it:
10
65
(
ili
FROM COMMUNITIES SURVEYED
7Q2.1
7.2 2
7«2~3
7.2.4
7.2dl5
ic Characteristics
Characteristics
teristics
s and Settlement tterns
idents' Attitudes about Public Facilit
and Community Change
A ehold Survey Questionnaire
B Occupation Categories
C Supplementary Tables, Talkeetna
D Supplementary Tables, Cantwell
E Supplementary Tables, Healy
F Supplementary Tables, Trapper Creek
i
1
1
1 (
)
)
)
)
to ( )
to to Work )
( )
1 Unit (Talkeetna)
of Dwell Unit (Talkeetna)
idence (Talkeetna)
idence (Talkeetna)
Secondary Reasons for Moving to ent
(Talkeetna)
Levels of Satisfaction with Selected Public Facilities
and Services (Talkeetna)
Degree of Change Since 1980 (Talkeetna)
6 Opinion of Change (!talkeetna)
Distribution of Sampled Residents (Cantwell)
Household Size (Cantwell)
ive Households (Cantwell)
( 1)
11)
to ( 11)
ion to to (Cantwell)
iii
1
0
3
47
2
10
5-11
1
(
( 1)
1)
Reasons for
isfaction with Select Fubl
(Cantwell)
of Change (Cantwell)
to
tribution of Sampled Residents (Healy)
Size (Healy)
tive Households (Healy)
Primary Occupation (Healy)
Seasonality of Employment (Healy)
Travel Time to Work (Healy)
Transportation Used to Get to Work (Healy)
Location of Employment (Healy)
Type of Dwelling Unit (Healy)
Ownership of Dwelling Unit (Healy)
idence (Healy)
e ( )
for to
5
ili ies
6
1
7
76
78
79
81
82
t
S ~ect l. l.
s ( )
(
of )
Creek)
Creek)
Employment (Trapper Creek) 9
ion Used to Get to Work {Trapper Creek)
of Employment (Trapper Creek) l
ling Unit {Trapper Creek) 10
Ownership of Dwelling Unit (Trapper Creek) 1
Length of ~esidence (Trapper Creek) 1
11 Previous Residence (Trapper Cr ,· :~ ) 105
Primary and Secondary Reasons for Moving to Present
Location (Trapper Creek) 1
Satisfaction with Selected Public Facilities
es (Trapper Creek) 1
14 of Change Since 1980 (Trapper Creek) l
15 of ( Creek) 111
of s ( le) 113
e) 1
t ( e) 15
v
to
to to (
1
1
Locat
1 1
i
on
t , as 1 as sat
1 uded 9 7 hous 1 t
of the households in
l of ion was 29.3
's households eonta
size was 2. of
was 1. i was 0.
1
E
t
t
cent: (35)
t
1
)
le
cat
ofessionals,
(
tee
( 23) struc
traveling to or
(55)
ian
travels t in household was ~7
percent . ( 83) of the 97
ly dwelling units.
percent ( 72) of the hous
ling unit in which they resided.
es ..
length of residence in Talkeetna for the res
8.8 years.
11. The most frequently cited primary reason for moving to
was to obtain a job.
2
1
12. 1 respondents (97) were satisfied th the mental
s es available-; 73 ent (71) were sat th
school system the ambulance s ent ( )
sat f wi the library, and 67 ent (65) were sat
id waste or dis In contrast,
( s dis sat f
indoor recreation facil ies.
2
t
1
were
fi
)
)
ent 97
1
1 ion was 31
of Cantwell's population were Nat
3 household size was 2.82 ons.. The ts
was 1.98 and the number of chil was 0 ..
A ing vacancy rate of 33 percent (33) was
Thirty-nine percent (37) of the adults in the Cantwell e wer
employed all year, while 45 percent ( 43) were not empl
time during the year.
6.. The largest occupational groups represented were: 17 percent (17)
professionals, technicians, managers and s f-employed; 13 ent
( 13) service workers; and 7 percent ( 7) transportat
time spent traveling to or from by t
t in househo was es ..
3
1
1 0
13.
1
r
amount
most
was to
( )
( ) of the
res
1
1 16 or more
hous
ly cited primary reason
a job.
15
1
to
s were sat percent (48) of the res
services available; 94 ) were sat
fire protection service; and 90 ent
sat is with the ambulance service.
of the respondents were dissatisfied with
·-garbage disposal and 33 percent (16) were dis sat f
road system.
Thirty-nine percent ( 19) of the respondents felt
changed a great deal since 1980. Of th~ 19 respondents
deal of change had occurred, 37 percent (7) 0
change had for the wo-rse, while 42 percent (8) f
been for the better.
4
(
1
t t
t
A
were
125
le eho
of ion
s was 3.21
was 2 e 05 and the
rate of 10 percent {20) was
56 percent (143) of the adults in
year-round, while 34 percent (88) were not
time during the survey year.
6o The largest occupational categories re esent were:
1 ..
9.
professionals, technicians, managers" and sel (
percent or 40 workers); mining (14 percent or 36
structural workers (9 percent or 24 workers); and m.iscel
workers (9 percent or 23 workers).
time spent traveling to or from work by the employed
who travels farthest in each household was 18 minutes.
Sixty-five percent (81) of the 1 households l
ly dwelling units.
s even percent ( ) of the households
1 unit which they resided.
t
1 •
ent ( 71)
8
t reason
to
( 124) of res ........... ...,..,,,,. .. were sat f
fol
with the fire protect e,
ent (
were sat
were sat with the library, percent (119) were sat
system, and 92 percent (115) were sat fi
ser es available. In contrast, 52 ent ( )
fied with indoor recreation facilities and 41
satisfied with outdoor recreation facilities.
(49) of the respondents felt Healy
since 1980 and were of the opinion
been for the better.
1.4 KEY FINDINGS: TRAPPER CREEK
}
51)
surveyed included SO households, representing 90 adults 1
profile of the households in Trapper Creek indicat
1. 3ge of the population was 27.9 years.
were no Nat households surveyed in
6
i
hous rate 27 ent ( ) was
( ) ts
were e ent: ( ) were
ent were:
percent (14) service professions, and 9 perc nt (
ed workers.
spent traveling to or work by
farth~st in each household was 77 es.
8; Eighty-four percent (42) of the households surveyed 1
ly dwelling units.
Seventy-six percent (38) of the households surveyed
dwelling unit in which they resided.
Average length of residence in Trapper Creek was 8.2 years ..
11 * The most frequently cited primary reasou for moving to
Creek was availability of land and/or housing ..
12. Ninety percent (45) of the respondents were sat
service available; 93 percent (47) were sat
tem; and 83 percent (42) were sat fi
t state protection and indoor recreation ilities ..
Seven ent ( ) of the s were d sat
7
13
(
occurr (4
( ) li
e amount s
t
or 6
8
a
ent)
or 9
t
1
ent).,
to
i
was not on.
t, household surveys were
Associates, Inca )
Can twe 11 • The 1 hous
the following objectives:
to the communities surveyed.
survey area for Talkeetna to include
connec ing Talkeetna and the Parks Highway.
3" e the sample size for Talkeetna, Cantwell,
Creek to reduce the sampling error.
1
Update and refine existing data on the communities of
Cantwell, and Trapper Creek.
1983 survey,
e of the
face-to-face were us
l size of the population, a
interviews were
to ensure a relatively high
9
us inst
response rate.
le s
1
or
1
t
s
ewers were one to
t were
t
1 l) 1
each town were defined as
Within the three-sect area
at the end of the Talkeetna Spur
the Talkeetna Spur Road to ersect
Cantwell -In or near the community; easily a.efined
surrounded by public land.
3... Healy -Around the railroad station, T'~i-Valley subdivis
the Otto Lake area.
Creek -From the Petersville Road and
intersection east to the Susitna River, west to Scotty
within a corridor one mile north of Petersville Road and one
south (where houses end on the Highway)@
area are displayed in 1
it
1
.-~
14
0 Mi 1
'-. ,..J
1
1 e
1 5
1 4 towns 552
119 vacant
were at 1
rate of 69 percent.
, 241 occupied dwelling units were ti
vacant ( percent vacancy rate). Seven other dwell
s road. Ninety-seven interviews were et
e rate in Cantwell was 72 percent, at
compl • Out of 101 identified dwelling units,
vacant and 67 percent were occupied.
survey area in the commmunity of Healy had 196 dwelling units, 1
vacant units, 1 unit's occupancy status could not be determined, 7
ts occupied. One hundred twenty-five interviews were compl
e rate of 71 percent.
highest survey response rate (75 percent} was achieved in
of Creek. Ninety-two dwelling units were identified; ts were
vacant, whi 67 were occupied. Fifty int were complet
15
, such. as
(e.g~~~,
6 were
were
50-59 of
sec
use of s
(chi-square) test for
16
es as a
townsite
center
access o
runs town on
the summer
recently,
expeditions ( icularly
characteristics that outline the
include age, race, household size, number
of the population.
e
) a c
Average age of the Talkeetna sample population was .3
which was very similar to the average of 1
residents (28 years) in 1982 (Frank Orth and Associates, Inc. 1983).
(under 18 years) made up 34 percent of the persons in the
er
eholds, while the elderly ( 60 or more years) account 5 ent
( 13).
17
.3 years
Harza-Ebasco Computer &.""n, SAS Program "Survey 05," 5 ..
18
1 1
) ..
to 3 (
ts
, 17 per,cent (
10 ent (4) were
(Table 3-1). Of
51 ent (33} were primary school-age <-~·.&-~·&
Only one
surveyed in
e l::u:.tusehold members belonged to a Native
There were 241 occupied housing
Talkeetna during the 1984 survey period.
rate was 19 percent. Multiplying the number
to lude , or
(
1
s
( )
( } 0
} 0*
~~
2.
ll#t!lllll'ld'!I'J!Q!i.l:~~~~~
to
to
te
Computer Run, SAS n
t: of
3-4).
or 12
retired or did not t
C-1 presents the relat ionsh tween
Tbe 18-to 29-year-olds were
be nc hwo r k, vh i 1 e the mach i ne t r a s
ture, fishery, and forestry category consisted of
( 18-29 years and 40-49 years) fl The other
consisted of employees from various ages not
the year (ranging from.. 14 percent of the 40-to
of the to 39-year-olds).
r-ol to
1
4
4
3
8
6
14
188
u
'
7
J
2
4
3
6
7
1 ) summer, percent ( )
( ) were not
household were
l17aS
were
as professionals (
or 12 of 14) J s (
17 ion-related w~rkers (88 7
e All those employed as recreat
were unemployed during tb~ winter, 30 )
ion were not employed any t during
3.2.2~3 Transportation and Travel Time to Work. Each of
was asked, of the employed adults, who spent
t to or from their place of employment, how much time it
get to work, and what type of transportation this on us
to work.
B for occupations thin the list
1
1
• 1
Computer Run, SAS Program
s
4
'li\l'C1S
(
to
( )
to
or
(
(8
• In contrast~ 13
t s
es » 't!IS.S les
ent), or ts
to
car or
us
&
The
the person who spent the
Forty-eight percent (47) of
s
e 3-8), while 27 (26)
as Palmer, Wasilla! Willow, and other
In addition, eight percent (8)
97
i
towns near
1 towns
characteristics inquired about in the questionnaire inc
patterns and dwelling unit types.
Eighty-six percent (83) of the hous
in single-family dwelling units, 12 ent
( ) lived in mobile homes, 1 percent ( 1) lived in a duplex, and l ent
"othern (Table J-9).
ques ion to -only one adult
of respondents oyed versus those
er ts Section 3.2.2o
t one
hours
7
8
4
13
11
t household
Run, SAS
7
n
I
9
4
5
)
not
1
s
1
9
11
1
9
11
4
1
8
11
97
1
1
1
1
er 9J 1
1
ent {20)
) were renters (
tern t
res
choosing to set
Thirty
years~ 26
as shown in
t s were
(
ent ( 25)
e 3-lla A
ent or 8
lived in Talkeetna for
) or 16 or more
length of residence in
indicated that 97 percent (183) of
lived in Talkeetna full-t
)
5
was 8~8
adults
or 1
1
3~2c4c2 Prior Location of Residence a~d Reasons for Movinge s
or
where they lived prior to moving to Talkeetna
to move to Talkeetna. The largest number of in-migrants (
respondents) came from Anchorage, followed by 36 percent (34) came
out-of-state locations (see Table 3-12). Thirteen percent ( 12) came
area~ of Alaslta, with smaller numbers of in-migrants coming
other areas of the Mat-Su Borough, and other areas
Only one respondent had always lived in Talkeetna.
were asked to give their two most important re~sons
to shown in Table 3-lJ the most fr ly ci
reason for moving to Talkeetna was to obtain a (
31
ent
1 1
Computer Run, SAS P~ogram os,n
1
25
1
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey ~ 1
move)
2
Run,
1
1
4
13
1
or
)
REASON FOR MOVING TO
(TALKEETNA)
ive Area
a Job.
a Business
ility of Land and/or Housing
t:ion
or Relatives Nearby
Qu.ality
Reason
icular Reason
not move)
Computer Run, SAS
1
16 a
9
1
11
1
PRESENT LOCATION .
Frequency
2 2
3 3
1 1
5 5
7 7
3 3
10 10
15 16
50 52
1 1
91 100
"Survey ~-:;
·-"'
s
"?"'P't!'W"~
1
(
li
(13
reasons were to s t
reason cit ent ( )
as
( 1), recreation
an e
es
ilities s
were offered: satisfied, indif ssat
es inquired about were available in
health services.
reported being satisfied with the
, even though they are only available outside of
by 73 percent satisfied with both the school system
s
e service, 70 percent satis~ied with the library, and 67 ent
sat with solid waste or garbage disposal (see Table 3-14) e In
contrast, 60 percent of the respondents reported being dissatisfied
the medical sarvices and indoor recreation facilitiesc In addit , a
1 percentage of respondents were indifferent (nei satis or
fied) to the road system and other transportation services (
52 , respectively.
s es
es
21
100
34
10
47
not to 100
37
0
52
0
26
ent to
7
10
0
4
60
• 1
t
c
9
)
( )
{11)
since 1
t
t
6
)
had worse
that of the s
for the worse, not one
1; 2 felt; the degree of
a grE:at deal. Of the 29
had been for the better and 27
better nor worse, a large portion felt
moderate ( and 17, respectively)&
(
( )
nor
16)@
of
6
1
94
Computer Run, SAS Program "Suz:vey 1
4
11
21
n
'
1
4
f settlement 1 was 1
l
construct
to
mines clos
Highway connect
ll located three les east
to community as ing to
the train., Greater seasonal
t result in development of more s tour
and Denali highways. This devel now connec s
Old Cantwell thereby creating a larger more
4o2.,1 Demographic Characteristics
characteristics that outline the changing composit
ion include age, race, household size, number and of
size of the population.
shown in Table 4-1, the 41 children (under 18 ) ln
the surveyed households made up 30 percent of the persons e
hous , while persons 60 or more years of account for 8
ent (11) of the sample. Estimates for the State of Al in 1
the ft~~~n?rion of children and persons 60 or more years of to
percent and 3 ent, respectively (Frank Orth and soc tes,
-31
Har.za-Ebasco Computer Run., SAS Program "Survey 05) n 1
42
1112
~ ... -'im'Tt'l!¢J!'IQ
12
15 11
4 3
6 4
10
32 23
27
13 9
11 8 .. _
138 100
= 31
Har.za-Ebasco Computer Run, SAS Program ,.Survey 05, u 1
(
l
1
ts
1
1 tate est
was 31 y~ars , le
were an
as shown in Table 4-2. Overall,
12 percent (16) preschool chi
junior high school-age chil
children (Table 4-1). Chi
ent ( 15) of the 25 total
1.
of
11
chi
~o~L~ 1 .,4 Nat:ivell Population in Cantwell. Approximately 12 (
households in Cantwell contained at least one person
1
ent
ent ( 6)
)
E , Indian, or another type of Alaskan Native, and at least one
(
the 12 (24 percent) households belonged to a Native
4-3). Of the 138 people in the Cantwell sample, 27 (20
were Alaskan Natives.
ive is defined to include Eskimo, Ind , or any
)
I
( )
( )
)
approximate grades children
age-grade match and th
in grade-levels~~
Computer Run, SAS P!'ogram Survey 05,19
1 1
12
to include Eskimo, Ind
1 tive households f
05,"
1
size le
area
loca.t
sect
oyment,
occupat:
into categories us
s are displayed in Table 4-4. The
£-employed category was the
th 17 percent ( 17) of the working
of
by
ts
oc
ts
t
1
t
om
1,
pr
that ity. Second to the professional cat: was
ice worker category with 13 percent (13), followed by he
ion-related worker category with seven percent (7).
A crosstabulation table (Appendix Table D-1) displays job cat ies
( oc ions) by various groups. The 60-year and older e oup was
only group to have employees in the agriculture~ fi es)
See Appendix B occupations within the 1 category list
1,
1
t
{ )21
1
t
7
7
3
13
1
4
2
3
7
2
3
3
40
1
17
3
13
n
t
1
4
2
3
7
2
3
3
11
f
(
ent of
e (
4-5).
of
to
ts
1
t
to 71
·were employed all
percent) were not
ts
s
( residents in 49 households) ..
there were two occupa tiona 1 categories~/ in
of l
11
it
at t
ld were
1
all year: cle~·ical and sales, and structural ..
to
who were employed as professionals (63 perc~nt or 10 )
employed as service ~~orkers (85 percent or 11 workers) also
all year. In contrast, all workers employed in mining
ture, fisheries, and forestry were seasonally unemployed during the
Travel to Work In of
households surveyed, the respondents were asked, of the
s the t time traveling to or from the ce of 1
much tim.e it took this rson to get to work~ what
tion this used to travel to
B t ral ca li
0
1
2
1
(
to
) G
(
to
were not empl
to
wa.s
ent), or
or om e
etlt (9
Table 4-8, 30
location. of
ing to work.
s
less
ts
to
for
terist inquired about in the quest
patterns and dwelling unit types.
)
e
1
Type of Dwelling Unit. Of the 49 households sur·veyed in Cantwell,
} lived in single-family dwelling units, 5 (10 percent) 1
homes, 2 (4 percent) lived in duplexes, and 1 hous d ( 2
ent) lived in a multi-family building (Table 4-9).
e this
number and perc
er from the
tion applied to only one t d,
respondents employed versus those
ts· presented in Section 4.2.2ol.
)
= 2
... = <15 minutes
= 22 minutes
2
2
1
0
1
11
47
the one adult per household who travels
not tot~l 100 due to rounding
1
51
4
2
0
2
Harza.-Eba.sco Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05," Jan .. 1
51
t
GET
9
)
11
Computer Run, SAS urvey 05,"
2 52
1
Harza-Ebasco Computer Run, SAS Program
Home 41
2 4
1 2
Computer Run, SAS 0 .· n -'
s tlentent
seasonali
reasons
tern
ers (
teri t
res
to settle
le
1
)
s 1
s) had lived in
more than 16 years. ent ( 10 res
15 ler
lived in Cantwell for less a year (8 ent or 4)
1 ent or 5),. Overall, the average 1 res
1 was 15 However, length of residence vari
households. Eighty-three percent (10)
report living in Cantwell for 16 or more
ent (5) of non-Native households reported living
1 time (see Appendix Table D-3). The largest ent
ive households (27 percent or 13) reported living in Cantwell
eight years. The survey also indicated that 91 ent ( )
ts)
91 ts and 93 percent (38) of the 41 children ~ived in Cantwel
1-time.
4.2 o4 .2 Prior Location of Residence and Reasons for Moving. s
were asked where they lived prior to moving to Cantwell why e
to move to Cantwell. Approximately 33 percent ( 16) of the res s
1 out tate before moving to Cantwell (as shown in le
s t number of in-migrants came from (16 ent or 8)
other areas of the Rai lbel t ( 16 percent or 8). In t , 15 ent
(7) the respondents alw•ys lived in lle
56
5
= 15
co Computer Run, SAS Program
1112
10
31
n
' e 1
t
not mov~)
Computer Run, SAS Program
of
4
u
6 "
to
(2 ent or 1)
1 was to
two mo:s t
3, most
a
(
reasons
ent' ( 7) s
reason" was reason cit
as their s reason
secondary reasons given were to obta a job,
or , recreation opportunities, fri or
titudes ilities
an e
4~2<1>.5.,.1 Attitudes about Public Facilities an.d Services ..
1 were asked to rank their level of sa.tisfacti.on with
Thre~ options were offered: satisfied, indi
)
sat fied. All of the 13 service~ inquired about were available
commun1ty of Cantwell, except mental health services and medical care~
in le 4-14, the library received the highest
itive responses (98 percent), followed by fire protect
Q.W.WII.Ii.lloQ ........ e service (90 ent)~ the school tem (84 percent),
t ection ( 83 percent). Thirty-eight ent the
were satisfied
ent who were clissat fi
solid waste and
Wl. the road system~
sposalll
30 ent
) "
to
s
ent) z
state
s
were
4
and/ot
• 4
Run, SAS
1
8
1
1
3
1
4
1
45
11
2
7
2
15
1
teet
1:
90
1
4
1
4
15
4
3
2
6
t
t
ent (10)
no
of s e 1
any changes in 1 e
51 percent (19) were
the better, while 35 percent (13)
worse. The remaining 14 percent (5)
ter nor worse (Table 4-16).
( )
t
shows that seven of the respondents were of
deal of change had taken place and that the
worsee Also, four were of the opinion that changes
nor worse, and believed that a great deal of change
1980. In addition, eight were of the opinion that changes
better, and believed that a great deal of change had taken
1 since 1980.
1 8 1
f
49
Computer Run, SAS nsurvey os,u
112
t 5
n
'
te
of
1 les
coal
characteristics that outline
, ra'Ce, ho.usehold size,
tion.
Fa
i
shown in Table 5-1, the average
years) was younger than the a:verage
s (28 years) in 1982 (Frank Orth Associates,
on
y
of
of
of all
Inc.
(60 or more years) accounted for a mere 2 percent (8) of 1
in the surveyed households, while the children (under 18 )
for 36 percent (145). Estimates for the State of
the proportion of <:1.! ildren and persons 60 or more
30-35 percent and 3 percent, respectively (Frank Orth and soc esll
• 1983). The 18-to 39-year-olds made the t
tion, accounting for 1~;7 percent ( 188) of the 401 rsons
survey.
1 10
7
5
98
40 10
20 5
8 2
401
e3 years
Harza-Ebasco Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05,"
1112
10
es
)
)
le
)
( )
, cl1i1
5 percent (20) were
chi
Approxima.t
the Healy sample were households
s
' 45
two of those four Native househol
Of the 401 people in the Healy
During the 1984 survey period~ 1
survey-defined area of Healy. The
1 )
ent ( )
(3
le, 3
hous
1
ent)
at least one
a
ent (11)
ts were
rate
eut a Multiplying the number of occupied housing units ( 1 )
average household size of 3e21 (Table 5-2) yields an est
of 565 people in the survey-defined area of Healy.
t
Native is defined to include Eskimo, Indian~ or
Native group.
s
( )
Ch (
il ( 7 )
approximate grades children
age-grade match and
in grade levels.
e
oil>
) Oo
0.16
3o21
Harza-Eb~sco Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05,"
d
~-~~
-~-
to
4 3
am 1
to include Eskimo, Indian, or any
All ive households at least
co Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05," .. 1
1112
1
i of of
to travel to
oc t
s sel
(14 percent or 36 ) ; structural
(9
( ) of adults ly no
(Table 5-4).
A cross (Appendix ·rable 1) s ca
( groups. Fifty percent (20 ()f 40) of
we·re as fessionals, technicians, or sel
to 39-year-old age category, while the cl 1 sa
cat was composed of 30-to 39-year-olds (67
ly, all age groups except the 50-to 59-year-ol
rcent
percentage of respondents that were not employed,
(23 of 96) of the 30-to 39-year-olds to 51 percent (
the 18-to 29-yea.r-olds ..
5.2 .. 2.2 Seasonality of Emf~Ol!ent. All respondents in' the
were asked whether any working adulta had a job from which
a re
of
o or unemployed part of the year. Approximately 20 adults (8
indicated that they were
1/ B for oc tions within the 1 ca list
(9
t
)
)
I
1,
5 2
7
1
9
6 2
36
23 '9
3 1
(not emp 1 oyed )1J 85 __ ,
260 100
• 2
Appendix B for occupations within the general category list
includes homemakers~ students, and unemployed ee
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05,"
2 71
to
to
) ..
an
(
(
ts
to
(17 40)
summer* The
round were clerical
)
)
ion-relat occupat
Each the 1
·who s
their place of employment, much
to work, and what type of transportation
shows that the majority, 85 adults (71 percent)1/,
es to work, followed by 17 adults (14 percent) who
es to work. In addition, 6 adults (5 percent) reported less
e travel time to get to work. The average time spent
work was 18 minutes, while the median time was less than 15
ll See Appendix B for occupations within the 1 t
e this quest ion appl i to only one a.dul t
and of respondents employed versus e
differ results presented in Section 5.2.2 .. 1 ..
us
1-15
1
to or
es.,
1
)
111
260
8
55
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05,"
)
6
J
1
J
0
4
5
71
3
1
3
0
3
119 100
time for the one adult per household who travels
a 6
• <15 minutes
a 18 minutes
Harza-Ebasco Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05," Jan. 1
1
1
ent ( 2) us
s .... a, 91
s
ent ( 2) those who the
teristics inquired about in the quest
terns and dwelling unit types.
1
Sixty-five percent (81)
single-family dwelling units, fol
ent (31) who lived in mobile homes or travel trailers 9 6
duplexes or a multi-family building, and 4 percent (6)
type of dwelling such as a cabin or motel room (see Tab ).
5.2.3.2 Home Ownership. Seventy-seven percent (95) of the 125 hous
reported owning the dwelling unit in which they resided.
(27) were renters (Table 5-10).
t
not
112
) 2
4
122
13
2
3
100
Computer Run, SAS Program "S~rvey 05,"
~~:li:MM"""t
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
4 3
123
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey OS,n
1
Computer Run, SAS
1
6
"Survey n
'
6
4
e 1
2 1
1
a 1
Run, SAS
(
1
r
set ement tern
seas i res
reasons to sett
ent ( )
een percent (21) 1
percent (17) report 16 or more
s 1 year® Overall,
was eight years & However, 1
non-Native households. 1 Native hous
for 9 or more years, while 59 percent ( 71)
eholds reported living there for 8 or less (
survey also indicated that 94 ent ( 245) 2 1
percent (144) of the 145 children from e 1
imefj
5o2.4o2 Prior_Location of Residen·ce and Reasons for Moving. ts
where they lived prior to moving to Healy and why they chose to move
to • The largest number of in-migrants (49 percent or 60 s)
came from an out-of-state location, followed by 17 percent (21) came
Fairbanks, 13 percent (16) from other towns in the Railbelt, 10
( 13) from other areas in Alaska (Table 5-12).. Only one
had always lived in Healy~
Respondents were also asked the two most important reasons for
Healy. Table 5-13 displays the respondents primary and s
moving to Healy.. most frequently cited primary reason
was to obtain a job ( 74 percent or 90 respondents),
to
reasons
to
1 by
= 1
17
1
11
17
100
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05,n • 1
81
ion.
( not move)
1
8
4
60
1
1
3
13
1
Computer Run, SAS Program nsurvey 05,"
.. .
4
FOR
(HEALY)
Land. and/or Hous
5
5
1
. 121
2 1' 1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
13
1
1
68
1
u
'
l
sat is
inquired
ly (medical~ mental,
1 (1
indi
werce not ava
5-14, percent of the respondents were sat f
service available, followed by 98
protection available, 96 percent were sat f
who were satisfied with the school
who were satisfied with the medical services avai
contrast, 52 percent of the ·respondents were dissatisfied th
recreation facilities and and 41 percent were dissatisfied with
re·creation facilities.
5$2.5$2 Attitudes about Community Change. Respondents were also if
they noticed any changes in Healy since 1980. A majority (51 or
respondents), answered they had noticed a great deal of change s
(Table 5-15). Twenty-nine percent (36) noticed no , 18 ( )
noticed a te amount of change, and 2 ent (2) noticed a small
amount of change.
tem.
tat
th Services
Services
L
Recreational
it
Total percentages
Harza-Ebasco
79
92
52
69
84
10
96
36
3
1
0
5
1
2
10
11
3
7
1
12
10
may not add to 100 percent due to
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey
4
0
13
23
3
52
41
05,11
5
2
No
Computer Run, SAS Program
18
51
urvey OS,u
(
t
( )
(11) t
(9)
) .
s 1 s
e
tter nor wot-se, 10
worse e 16)
were of
( 18) ~Jere
a moderate amoun~ since 1
1, only a small number 01f
had been fo·r worse (7 or 9
nor
ter
2
9
11
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey
10
1
," Jan..,
6
new
depended
for transportat to
, unl Talkeetna, Cantwell, or Healy
townsite. The community, which is
buildings at the junction of the Parks
Parks Highway and Petersville Road.
characteristics that outline the changing composit
ion include age, race, household size, number and age of
size of population.
scatt
Average age of the Trapper Creek sample population was 27.9
(Table 6-1), which was almost identical to the all
residents (28 years) in 1982 (Frank Orth Associates, Inc0 1 ).
Children (under 18 years) made up 40 percent ( 61) the
eholds surveyed, while the elderly (60 or more 6
( 9). The of children
the 1982 es for State of Alaska, when the
was ent (Frank Orth and Associates, Inc. 1 ) .
)
.9 years
11
21
31
14
9
151 1
1
13
7
21
10
9
6
Harza-Ebasco Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05," Jan. 1
j
d
Of 1
(35) were
7 ent (11) were s
6-l)o Children of j
There were no
the community of Trapper Creek.
There were 92 housing units i
Trapper Creek during the 1984 survey
1 vacancy rate of 27 percent was determined from the
r in an estimated 67 occupied housing units. Multiplying
occupied housing units (67) by the estimated average household s1ze
defined to include Eskimo, Ind , or ot
group ..
91
1112
( )
(
( )
17 )
children may at
match and this table
grade levels.
Com;pu~er Run, SAS Program "Survey 05, n
{
were ret
Table
ion) and
)
in th sect
ion trans
s in
for adult 1
represented were the
(20 percent or 19 workers),
'£'~"'""''1il'>ii.IP.ei!I"Pii!11), and trans porta t ion-re la
). In addition, 16 percent ( ) of
and 23 ·percent ( 21) did not work any t
6-3).
F-1 presents the relationship between job
The 40-to 49-year-olds were the only
in clerical and sales positions, while the 30-to
workers to be employed in structural trades, benchwork,
at least 60-year-olds were the only workers employed
ieulture, fishery, forestry sector. The professionals, service
ca
ine trades, reerea tion-based, and transportation occupations cons
(9
of from various age groups. The 18-to 29-year-olds to
:39-year-olds had a greater number unemployed adults (9 and 7, res t ly)
B for occupations within the general ca list ·
s
B for
includes
ions within
1
3
1
3
4
8
2
1
14
21
n ,
3
4
9
1
1 t
(
also
)
31
1
( ) were not t
The benchwork ca
ea in ich all
a m.ajority of those who were empl
18), service workers (86
ted worker~ (88 percent or 7 of 8),
2 3)B and structural workers {
year-round., The recreation-based ca
none of the workers reported being employed
ly unemployed in either the winter or su~er.
)
or 12
or 2 of 3)
61/l2e2o3 Transportatio"' and Travel Time to Work. Each of. the 50
was asked, of the employed adults, who spent the longest t
ing to or from work, how much time it took this person to t to
t type of transportation this person used to travel to work.
B tions within the 1 ca 1 t
1
9
1
37
(1
1
4
t to or was 77 1
was less minutes.
( ), or those ts
car or
while 21 percent (10)
t survey year; not
The respondents
where t:h~ person who the
was employed. Forty-nine percent (24) of
(Table 6-7). Tha North Slope was ci by 5
( ) and other towns in Alaska were cited by 9 hous
6~2.3 Housing Characteristics
ing characteristics asked about in the questionnaire inc
patterns and dwelling unit types.
6.2.3.1 Type of Dwelling Unit. Eighty-four percent (42) of the
in Trapper Creek sample lived in single-family dwelling units,
ent (5) lived in mobile homes, and 4 percent (2) lived
(Table ).
1/ to only one adult per hous
entages of respondents
ts ented in.
oyed versus
tion 6e2 .. 2 .. 1 ..
e
(1
exes
• 1
minutes
or 1-2.
7
1
3
1
1
1
one t per household who travels
05,"
2
)
1
1
Run,
2
9
n
'
:Ill 1
1
5
9
49
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey
21
100
2
5
1
50
Computer Run, SAS Program nsurvey
1
4
2
1
ent ( ) were renters (
tern t were
res
reasons to sett
ix percent (18)
Trapper Creek. for 4-8 ; 18 ( 9)
l
t
18 percent (9) had lived
l there for more 16
t proportion, 12 percent (6), reported 1
t amount of time (less than 1 year).
was 8.2 years. The survey also indicated that
and all 61 children from the e 1 in
6.2.4.2 Prior Location of Residence and Reasons for Movin~.
were asked where they lived prior to moving to Trapper Creek
c e to move to Trapper Creek. The largest number of in--migrants (
or 18 respondents) ca:me from Anchot~age, followed by 26 ent ( 13)
came fr,om an out-of-state location, and 16 percent (8) who came
other areas of the Railbelt (Table 6-ll)e Only one respondent
1 in Trapper Creek8
Respondents were asked to give their two most important reasons
tc, Trapper Creek. As shown in Table 6-12, the most frequently ci
t'':~ason for to Creek was availability of
(44 ent s), followed by ob iug a ( ent Ol:'
14 respondents)(; primary reasons given were to set up a s,
recreation ties, hous quality, an area to 1
351112
4
6
Run, u ,
2 4
3
t 8
5
13
not move) 1 2
50 100
Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey OS,n Janlll 1
and/or ing
Nearby
Run,
5
3
2
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
3
8
9
17
1
50
2
s
2
6
8
8
6
'18
2
100
," Jan.
1 ci reason
( 17
(18 ent or 9) ll
ent or 8)' recreat t
area to 1 in (8 ent or 4) c t 1
fered: satisfied, indi , and dissat t
of Trapper Creek, exc medical care, mental th es
1
of the respondents reported being satisfi
service followed by 93 percent satisfied with tem,
percent satisfied with both the state trooper protection
ecreation facilities (see Table 6-13). In contrast, 75
respondents reported being dissatisfied with the mental health s es,
by 67 percent dissatisfied with the fire protection.
6 .. 2 .. 5.2 Att·itudes about Community Change., Respondents from the 50
households were also asked if they had noticed any changes in
C since 1980$ The majority, 53 percent (25), responded that
noticed a moderate amount of change since 1980 (Table 6-14) ...
percent (15) noticed no change, while smaller numbers reported they notic
a small amount of change (9 percent or 4 respondants) and a
(6 percent or 3 respondents). In addition to
s inee 1980, s were o their opinion
Of those noting a change.,
tem
1/
60
17
44
54
70
not to 100
1
11
5
13
0
17
0
11
10
12
12
ent to
n
ll
2
5
18
1
(
4
3 6
3
G 1
1
nor worse,
worse
change had
worse nor er.
110
26
15)
s
a
worse, ter or
ter
= 4
Run, SAS
l.ll
8
9
os,n
7
0
1 4 towns
were
(
7-1, the
1,
s
of
• 1 years • Four ( 41)
(970) consisted of persons 60 years
18 ) for 36 percent (34l)Q
y
ts
le
The overall average household size was 3.,
1
per household for the entire area was
As shown in Table 7-2, childrett compris 1 ~~
Thirteen percent (123) of the 970 people 1.n
e were preschool-age children, 18 percent (171) were primary
school-age children, and 5 percent (47) were secondary s e
(Table 7-1). Of the 218 school-age children in the total
(103) were primary school-age (kindergarten through 6th )~
7~1.1$4 Native!/ Population. Approximately 6 percent (19) of
households in the total sample contained at least one Native (Table ).,
Of the 970 people in the total sample, 4 percent (41) were Nat
112
1 13
11 11
1
7 47
159 16
128 13
73 8
41 4
970
.1 years
B.a.rza-Ebasco Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey 05," Jan.
113
( )
Cbil ( 14 ) 0.53
(1 1
to te children
the age-grade match and this table
attendance levelsQ
1
6
320
to lude Eskimo, Indian, or any
1 Native households contain least one
co Computer Run, SAS Program nsurvey 05," • 1
115
(
11
1 per 5
areas were oc
the (5
ehold size ) an
le area,@
household was
s living there$
sionals~ technic
occupat
mos
were:
or 111 ) service workers (11 ent or
ent { 187) of the adults did not work any t
7-4) f)
Each household in
there had a job from which
)
est
( ) or
) "
or of the year. Ten percent (61) iudicat were
percent 61) indicated they were unemployed ~er, 6
ent ( 38) reported being unemployed in the summer, 1 percent ( 9) were
in the spring, while 48 percent (307) were employed all
tion, 35 percent (221) indicated they were not employed any t
year (see Table 7-S).,
defined to include Eskimo, Indian, or any Alas
Nat
B ions within the cat list
1 6
111 17
es Persons 4
11
try
6 1
30 5
3 1
s 52 8
Rec1°eat Occupations 10 2
ed Workers 29 4
46 7
laneous Workers .39 6
Ret 34 5
(not employed):!:/ 187 29
639 100
No Response a 2
l/ See Appendix Table B for occupations within the general category
listings.
includes homemakers, students, and unemployed
Har co Computer Run, SAS Program usurvey OS,u ,
• J.
117
r.tot oyed)
9
307
221
636
D tr
Perc en
1
10
6
35
100
u m 1'1: !lllliUI~~
Computer Run, SAS Program nsurvey 05," Jan. 1
11
ace , how much i ook. th
to ~1ork, what of transport t t:h person
ent (1 )11 e s t
to or 1 5 es .. )
es 8 percent ( ) one
to The t to om
while median t was less than 15 es.,
A (67 percent), or 212 of those who t t
to or from , traveled by car or truck {Tabl~ 7-7)o teen
) walked to work, 5 percent (16) used other trans at
as p inations, and 2 percent (7) traveled to by plane.,
Seventy-seven percent (247)
in the total survey lived in single-family dwell units,
lowed·by 17 percent (53) who lived in mobile homes or travel trailers, 4
(13) who lived in duplexes or multi-family buildings, and 2 ent
(8) who lived in another type of dwelling such as a cabin or motel room (see
7-8) 0
7 .. 1 .. 3 .. 2 Home Ownet:shi2,• Seventy-six percent (242) of the 321 hous
surveyed reported owaing the dwelling unit in which they resided.
Twenty-three percent (73) were renters (Table 7-9).
l/ Because question applied to only one t hous ld,
number and percentage of respondents employed versus those l
differ the results present in Section 7~ls2$1.
119
<
l
)
the one t
Run, SAS
1
1
11
travels
2
4
3
7
12
05," Jan.
67
7
)
1 not add to 100 to
, SAS
1
OF DWELLING UNIT
( )
HoYlle 247
t 4
Home or er 17
( in or room) 8 2
100
Computer Run, SAS Progratu. nsurvey 05," ., 1
122
TABLE
OF DWELLING UNIT
)
Perc
Res
23
1
No ponse = 1
e: Computer Run, SAS Program "Survey OS," .. 1
1
ts 1 t
was
), and t (
population )
er to th~ 1 average of 1 res )
communities.
iz~ Survey results indicate Healy
--~----~~-----------
tes
household ( 3 .. 21) of the four t
1 east ( 2. 82).
There were no Nat
Creek. Natives comprised 1 percent
, 3 percent of H~aly' s population, and 20 percent
7.2.1.4 P~~ulatione During the 1984 survey period, the est t
ion was largest in the survey-defined area of Talkeetna (696 e),
lowed by Healy (565 people), Trapper Creek (202 people), and 1
(192 people)o
ll ive is to include Eskimo, Indian, or ot
Nat:
1
1 t 1 categot"'Y r
was s, t
16 ent Healy to c t
older) 5
s in Adults who were not
ranged from a high ent 1
to a. 30 percent in Talkeetna
most cit
was 1-15
time spent traveling to or from work, by
t in each household, differed communities$
least amount of travel time on the average was recorded in {18 es
t
time to work), followed by !.antwell (22 minu,tes),
{ 1'7 minutes), and Talkeetn.a. (87 minutes) ..
tr:n1sportation mode used most often in each household by the adult
ed the farthest to or from work, was a car or truck; ranging
ent in Trapper Creek to 82 percent in Healy.
51
7e2 .. 3 .. 1 Type of Dwelling Unit, Home Ownershi£1 an~ Vacancy Rates. S e-
ly dwelling units were the most common type of hous
· survey·-defined .area of four com.munities, th a low of 65 percent of
1/ Se•e Appendix B occupations within the category list
1
sat
1 In
res
satisfi )
e 1
, over lf (55
twell
1
was to
chose to m.ove
factory to
f
service
ent)
jobt>
gt'eatest
Healy,
(
lab to
e
t
res
to
t:
1
ent,
s
1,
ter ..
res
ent
In
s
res
1
t·
the worse.,
A
--
0
t '-----------
2. 7
3. but ·not
S. Vacaac Owellins
9. fJ/A
l
iii? 0' Qll -lit"'il!:l!~ll!l§ acat~lct nave a
puc of 11:1:1e 0 g~ 01' \i!!llllilfllll'llil'l>fil,,'lllll'liil
1,. ao a.ay ol die &f&uU:a iA e.bi.t
Q&~ t!iUll& eo bl!i
tG oeae~ , i~
won osr uc 11 ru~ .... ,,.,.•:• elM p•re ol ena
? ?
I
LCI ll
1
l
' 6
7
9
0
en:
s 01
• 10
)
l
l
4
? (
l <
8
-
-
-
-
)?
oa
full O'C'
l •
0 55
l7.
)
3 ~
or fa.&liee)
.. ~ottiie BaNI
5 rraYe1 C':'ailesr • •co.r bC!IIIII
6 1008/cat.ica i•
1 Olbet~
lata2 recr•. ro~ ~-o~ 4~
• use~~•l~aac ... ~.C
99 • ti/A
If lese ~-1 r••~. eocP~ 00
ALL ca m 21>
1
2 ... raiduwau
3 ...
~ • Otbe~ ~c-Su eoVfi
S ~ Otbe~ lailbelt
63
0 f I'U:ilUll i. fll
01 m lo~~ 0~ r~i~~ n~~-
08 a Fri~GG& or :eiativel
()i) II
'' ~-
Han
99 o ~lA (i.e. ~ida'e ~ov~)
21. t•4 tike to as• yo~ co r~, o~ a tcala of 1 co J, yo~r
~ftlrAC!%01 vi~b ~· follovicl faciliciea 4ftd
Je~tc&$ caac t ~iLl rea« aloud. Of couruo, ~~ of
~~-~~ arc ~be s~aca au~ ~~ by e~• ~c~s~
(if im CaBcv•llp say ocher sov•~~•u~al @ncitiet).
(~o fraccioGal scores)
Pt>oce~ticm
i~ Waaca or Catbac• diupc$&1
f. Otfta~ Madieal Care AD~ Services
h. -
Sysc•
Otbar eraaa,ortacioa beai4a& ro~a
(l&ilr~, airpor~u)
i. * .. , ....... -""""'"Mtmca1 !jultk S~ieaa
j. S@ciat Se~ieas (Give la.a,L•s:
Aid for 4epa~eac eDil4r••• food scampe)
lit • __ l!llill!llll!iiLi~ruiea
tac~aacioa Facilities
lact~acioa ractlicies
~2a Pt•••• Lao~ ac tbla ~ica so•• f~oa oa• eo tour.
OvEn• a! 1, i'l!ov wuld. you rae• Chi~ ~f i11
(ift~~~e to~) ehac n•8 ~ccur~ed tiftce L980.
1 .
69 iO
7)
75
11 78
79 ao
0
l
2
3
a
9
I 1 or J,
's
have
a
8J
the
worse
tter or worse
tter
•t -no ~nswer
M.A\11 (e.,, no
of the survey. Thank you for your
very lpful and it is 1reatly appreei
A-8
)
on.
17
23 24
28 29
34
Month
2S
30
Moo ttl
L. Jan/
lc
Je
4t~
lo
6o
1e
8111
31
no
)
es
Forces
ed
Transportation
Packaging and
ials Handling
Miuing
s ialists.
ellaneous
N/A
, hotel, restaurant
household workers, police
tors, ministers®
Loggers, commercial fishers,
landscapers.
Food, metal processing, ore refining.
Machinists, mechanics, printers, cab
Fabricators, asaemblers, and
jewelry, photo equipment, and
sewing machine operators.
Welders, electrical workers, carpenters,
construction workers.
Armed Forces ..
Guiding, mountain climbing.
Truck drivers, air transportation, railroad»
lot, Dept. of Transportation workers.
Packagers, movers, stevedores.
Borers, drillers, cutters, and blasting
tersll
Electric utilities, water and water treatment,
graphic arts workers, laborers, and
Retired.
Not employed.
-------------------------------------------------------------L-----------•w---
Standard Classification Manual, 1972, U0S0
Office, Washington, D.C.
Jcb
Service Workers
i radea
Structural
.Benchwork
Recreation-baaed
l stioo
lsnewa
l
1
2
4
2
l
1
0
2
0
1
Oistrlwtioo
Percent
o .. s
o .. s
l
2
l
o .. s
0 .. 5
0
l
0
!8
homeell'u:tkers 11 student a,
!00 due to
10
1
5
0 0 l
0 0 2
;" 7 2
0 0 0
.l 0 .. 5 l
} 2 2
2 l z
4 2 6
0 0 2
20 ll
70
l o .. s
1 0 .. 5 22
2 0 0 0 0 4
l 0 0 0 0 4
1 2 1 l o .. s 2}
0 0 0 0 0 2 l
o .. s 0 0 0 0 J
1 2 1 0 0 8
l 2 1 0 0
} 0 0 0 0 12
.i 4 z 8
':J 1 0
ll 1
JOB
Diet d.but!oo Dielributioo
Percent frequency Percent
Professionals z 1 9 5
Clerical & Sales 1 0 .. 5 l 0 .. 5
Service Workers 4 2 1 o.,s
Workers l OaS 1 0 .. 5
Machine l radsa 0 0 0 0
Structural 10 5 0 0
Bench~ ode l 0 .. 5 0 0
Recreation-based 2 l 0 0
ion l 0 .. ~ 0 0
6 } 0 0
~ii see llaneous 4 2 0 0
Retired 0 ·o 0 0
0 0 0 0
c.:..:z
S£ASONAlllY
[)!(!It d. but ioo
Percent
24 l:J
12 6
17 '
2 1
4 2
ll 1
.} 0 .. 5
0 0
1 4
0 0
8 4
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
41
fi
0 )5 I
0 14 1
0 22 12
0 4 2
0 4 2
0 23 12
0 2 1
0 2
0 8 5
0 6 J
0 12
1 14
41
VAD..E C-:J
DEGREE Of CHANGE SINCE 1980 BV OP~NION
Percent of
rraqueooy Respondent a
0 0 0 0 0 0 26 28 26 28
0 0 1 1 ·5 s 0 o· 6 6
2 2 17 18 14 J.S 0 0 33 35
a
Gr@at Deal 9 10 ' 10 10 11 0 0 28 Jl
TOTAl 11 12 27 29 29 <H 26 28 9) 100
D
JOB
--~~-==
Job . Oietribut ion Distribution Diat r i wt ion ion ion
frequency Percent frequency Percent Frequency Percent Percent
Professional& 0 0 1 1 s s s s 0 0 11
Clerical & Sales 0 0 2 2 1 l 0 0 0 0 ''I
t
Service Workers 0 0 s s 6 6 1 l 1 l Jl lJ
ure,
& forestry
Workers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 l
Machine l rades 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 16
Structural 0 0 1 l 0 0 l l 0 0 2.
Recreation-based 0 0 l 1 l l l 1 a 0 3 3
1 atioo 0 0 " 4 ' ' 0 0 0 0 1 1
2 2 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 2 2 u
Hiec~llaneoua 0 0 2 2 0 0 l 1 0 0 3
ired 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2
JO 11 9 10 ll 1 7 40 42
14 15 32 12 27 28 13 ll 11 97
8 for ioos within the n~AnArA
includes homemakers, students, and
Job
Professionals
Clerical & Sales 0
1
Workers 1
Machine Trades 1
Structural 0
Recreation-baaed 2
T l
2
Miscellaneous 1
Retired 0
0
ll
No tU.UliPOnse ::: l
Distribution
Percent
0
1
1
1
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
11
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
s
Diatr-ibuU.oo
Percent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
s
8 for ions within the ,._ .... ~r~
includes OO&:~iameki:trs
10 11 16
0 '
ll 11. 0 13
0 0 0 0 1 1
' J 0 0 4 4
2 2 0 0 2 2
l 1 0 0 J l
s 5 0 0 6 6
0 0 0 0 2 2
·2 2 0 0 l
0 0 J J J )
0 0 0 42 40 42
37 J9 4J 45 96
TABLE
lENGTH Dr RESI[l[NCY BY NATIVE AND ~>wuli1r-r'i!H
Percent of Percent of Porcant of Percent of
Frequency Respondent a Frequency Re.apondenta Frequency Ret~Pt:lindant:a
TOTAl .I)
Native is defined to includo 11!.-·a-•9
a Native ..
0
10 11
0
10
27 10 20
0
15 11 10
10 J7
10 12
15
of Percent of
frequtuacy frequency
0 0 0 0 0 0 12 25 12 25
Small J ,. 0 0 s 10 0 0 8 16
Change J ' 1 2 6 12 0 0 10 20
e
Great Deal 7 14 4 8 8 17 0 0 19 )9
TOlAl 13 26 5 10 19 19 12 t5 49 100
E
& Sales
Workers
l radEt&
St ruch.artid
Recreation-baaed
Hiscellamoua
Retired
TOTAl
: J
5
l
e
0
)
10
0
0
14
)
0
45
89
B for
Her za-E basco
0
!
•
0
0
6
1
0
19
}5 .. 5
SAS
20
2
8
0
10
12
0
2
'
10
0
23
96
9
1
'
0
4
5
0
1
4
4
0
9
)9
7
0
1
0
2
0
0
}
1)
I&
0
10
40
5! Jan .. 1985.,
0
1
0
0
1
s
2
0
4
16 .. 5
!S
0
2
0
2
2
0
1
2
}
1
2
20
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
Oo5
1
l
0 .. 5
1
9
}
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J.
1
}
8
Parcent
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .. 5
o .. s
l
'
1
0 0
17 7
24 ,
0 0
6 2
3118 l$
21 s
2
SJ J]
253
E-2
JOB SEASONAliTY Of OfPLOYt£Nr
Workers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Machine Trades 0 0 0 0 19 7 0 0 19 1
Structural 6 2 0 0 18 7 0 0 24 9
Recreation-based 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T ion 0 0 0 0 ' 2 0 0 6 2
0 0 0 0 J6 14 0 0 16 14
H.ieceJlaneous ' l 1 o.s 19 1 0 0 23 9
Retired 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 J l
0 0 0 0 0 0 81 32 32
TOTAl 9 J 20 a .. s 143 55 84 '' 256
8 for occupations ~d.th.in the
includes homemakers. students~ and
does not total 100 due to rounding.
SourcEu Harza-[baaco SAS " Jan. 1985.
14 11 21 17 }} 16
0 0 ·o 0 0 l 1
14 11 21 17 36 29 l6 29 17 14 124
iva if
one household me~nllEtr is a Native.
of Parcent of Percent of
frequency Fnquaooy Res,ondentm
0 0 0 0 0 0 17 }0 17 }(!
Saall 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Hooorat a Change 1 1 ] 2 18 lli 0 0 22 18
8
Gr,eat Deal ' s 8 6 49 40 0 0 61 50
TOTAL ' 8 11 8 61 54 17 lO 124 !00
F
~
Olatributloo D!strioot!oo Diatribut!oo Dlstrirut!oo ion i
frequency P&rcent frequency Percent Percent Percent Percent
Professionals 2 2 8 9 s 6 J ] l l '119
i
Clerical & Sales 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2
Service Workers 5 ' 5 6 2 2 2 2 0 0 14 16
l!I!!'Eill
& forestry
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 l
Machine T rades 1 1 0 0 l 1 1 l 0 0 J J
Benc~ork 0 0 .1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 1
St~ructural 0 0 J 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J
R~creation-based l l 2 2 0 0 l 1 0 0 J
l atioo 4 4 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 e
0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 l !
Retired 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 7 8
9 10 7 8 2 1 J J 0 0
22 24 31 J4 15 15 14 .14 10 90
o,~.,-~==--
Table A-2 for list
includes homemakers, students 9 ~nd
does not total 100 due to
Har za-f basco er '88
lA!BtE f-2
JOB
Job CHat ribut ioo Dlatributim Diet d but ion
frequency P6lercent Frequency Percent Percent
Professiomds 1 1 4 4 ll 14 0 0 !8
Clerical & Sales 0 0 l 1 l 1 0 0 2 2
Servica Workers 1 1 1 1 12 lJ 0 0 14 15
t
f iahery & forestry
Workers l l 0 0 0 0 .0 0 l }
Machine T rades 1 l 0 0 2 2 0 0 J '
Bsnchwork 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
Structural l 1 0 .0 2 2 0 0 J 31
Recreation-based l 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 ' J
l ranaport at ion l 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 8 9
2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Hi scellaneous () 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 l 1
Retired 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 15 14 15
0 0 0 0 0 or 21 24 21 24
TOTAl 9 9 8 8 }9 42 35 }9 91 99
See Table A-2 for Uet
Category includes homemakers, students, and
Percentage does not total 100 due to
Source: Harza-Ebasco SAS ~i Jan., 1985.,
~ TABLE r-J
\0 DEGREE OF CHANGE SINCE 1980 9V OPINION CHNS: ... ti -N
of Peecent of Percent of
Frequency Raepondenta Frequency
0 0 0 0 0 0 15 3} IS
s-11 2 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 4 9
Moderate Change 6 J.} 5 ll 1} 28 0 0 24 52
a
Great Deal 0 0 2 4 1 2 0 0 l 6
lOT At 8 17 9 19 14 }0 15 }J 1&6 !00