HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPA3313Susitna Joint Venture
Document Number
Please Return To
DOCUMENT CONTROL
·t
. -··--" ..
EXHIBIT E
SCHEDULES, OUTLINES AND GUIDELINES
SEPTEMBER 21, 1982
--"
Acres American Incorporated
157'7 C Street
Suite 305
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Telephone (907) 279-9631
I
_j
~~
l
·;·
I
••
. •. ~·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E X H I B I T E
SCHEDULES, OUTLINES AND GUIDELINES
j
) .
I
1
I
k
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-:'I
. .
. I.
•.
; ····•
I
•~
' .•.
I.
I)
. (,
I __
:: L
. I,J .
·~1·. "···'
, .. :.l
S C H E D U L E S
li
. I
'li .
••
II
I .
I
f
lr
•
II
!
I:·
\
•r •r, (
I .• ['
lr
I
I:
I
lr
lj
'
t .... ,
Description
M. Grubb
Clerical Staff
J. Lawrence
M. Grubb
Clerical Staff
M. Grubb
.C • Debe 1 i us
Cierical Staff
Distribution to
Agencies & FERC
fv1. Grubb
C., Debelius
Clerical Staff
Contractor
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Activity Begin Duration
Initial Draft Sep 1 10 days
Production Sept 16 2 days
Internal Review Sept 20 2 days
Revised Draft Sept 22 5 days
Production Sept 29 3 days
APA Review Oct 4 5 days
Revised Draft Oct 11 10 days
Revised Review Oct 25 5 days
Revised Production Nov 1
Nov 15
Revised based on
Agency & FERC
Comments Dec 6-19 days
F in a 1 Rev i ew Jan 5 4 cays
Final Production Jan 11 14 days
Printing Jan 31 7 days
Submit Feb 10 4 days
End
Sept 15
Sept 17
Sept 21
Oct 1
Oct 8
Oct 8
Oct 22
Oct 29
Nov 5
Jan 4
Jan 10
Jan 28
Feb 9
Feb 15
l'
I
I l
j.
I ! ~
j .
l I. l .
!
l
i r
! '
!
r
I
l
l '
l
l
r
Responsibility Action
l\f f DC Aquatic Systems Model
Staff Downstream Modeling Results
R&M Water Quality Report
R&M Groundwater Dynamics Report
R&M/PN Sedimentation Study Report
Date Required
ir
Oct 1
Oct 1/Nov 15 c.
Oct 1
Oct 1/Nov 15
Oct 1
... •.
.·
"I.·· "•
I t
I
l
I
I
! .
I \.
L
f
l~
I
11
I
I I
I
l
•• I
I
!
I
I
l
~·
~I
II (
I;
I
I
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 3 FISH, WILDLIFE, AND BOTANICAL WILDLIFE AND BOTANICAL SECTIONS
Responsibility Activities Begin Duration End
R. Sener (LGL) Initial Draft Sept 13 4 weeks Oct
Clerical Staff Production Oct 11 1 week Oct
M. Grr!bb Review Oct 18 1 w~ek Oct
R. Sener Revised Draft Oct 25 2 weeks Nov
Clerical Staff Production Nov 9 3 days Nov
Distribution to Agencies and FERC
WORKSHOP
R. Sener Final Draft based
on Workshop results Dec 6 4 weeks Jan
J. Hayden Senior Review Jan 5 1 week Jan
Clerical Staff Fin a l Product i on Jan 17 4 days Jan
Contract Printer Jan 31 2 weeks F-eb
Submit Fet 10 1 w.eek Feb -
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MILESTON~S
Responsibility Action Date Required
ADF&G Quarterly Reports July 30
R. Sener Initial Report Oct 8
u of A Data Reports Oct 25
1\f1F .\·G !)tl1t'tpr l v t~.r5pQ r t S Oct 30
IL Sener-F1nal uratt Jan 4
8
15
22
8
12
4
14
28
9
15
I
t
I
" l ! . r
f
1 .. · i
I
I
I
E
I
I
I
.. I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
'•
Responsibility
J. Dixon (U of A)
K. Young
J. Dixon
Distributed to
Agencies and FERC
J. Dixon
K. Young
J. Hayden
Cierical Staff
Contractor
Responsibility
J. Dixon
K. Young
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 4 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Activity Begin Duration End
Initial Draft Oct 4 4 weeks Oct 25
Review Oct 26 3 days Oct 29
Revised Draft Nov 1 1 week Nov 15
Nov 15
R ev i sed Draft
based on Agency
end FERC Comments Dec f) 4 weeks Jan 4
Final Draft Jan 5 1 week Jan 10
Senior .. Review Jan 11 2 days Jan 13
Final Production Jan 14 3 days Jan 14
Printing Jan 20 3 weeks Feb 9
Submit Feb 10 1 week Feb 15
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MILESTONES
Action Date Required
Initial Draft Nov 1
~inal Draft Jan 10
~l ..
lr
•r
•r
I r
Responsibility
P. Rogers (FOA)
M. Grubb
I r
I
f
P. Rogers
Distribute to
Agencies and FERC
P. Rogers
•r Je Hayden
P. Rogers
' ·~ Contractor
•r r ; ,
·~ \
•c
Responsibility
P. Rogers
ll l
P. Rogers/Acres
I! P. Rogers
I .,
I
II
l
II
II
L
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 5 SOCIOECONOMICS
Activity Begin
Initial Draft Sept 7
Review Oet 25
Revised Draft Nov 1
Nov 15
Final Draft Dec 6
Senior Review Dec 27
Camera Reaay Copy Jan 10
Printing Jan 20
Submit
~...,.,...,.............., ......
:~~ ..... -Feb 10
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MILtSTONES
Action
Initial Draft
Distribute to Agencies
and FERC
Final Draft
Duration End
8 \veeks Oct 25
1 week Oct 31
1 week Nov 8
2 weeks Dec 22
1 week Jan 5
1 week Jan 17
3 weeks Feb 9
1 week Feb 13
Date Required
Nov 1
Nov 15
Dec 22
I
lo i.
f
' ! '
I
I
l
!
j. I.
l
I
l
l
I
t •
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Responsibility Activity Begin Duration End
J. Gill Initial Draft Oct 1 2 weeks Oct 15
Clerical Staff Production Oct 16 1 week Oct 22
D. w. Lamb Review Oct 23 1 week Oct 31
J. Gill Revised Draft Nov 1 1 week Nov 8
Clerical Staff Production Nov 8 1 week Nov 12 ~ Distribute to FERC I
and Agencies Nov 15 ~ J. Gi 11 Final Draft Dec 6 1 week Jan 12
s. Thompson Final Review Jan 13 1 day Jan 14 r,~
['~
... .,;· (~
Clerical Staff Final Production Jan 15 4 days Ja 26 !1J an ... ~~ l,,
r~· ~~ "'• l ,--,
Contractor Printing ·-· Jan 20 3 weeks Feb 9 r ... +
Submit Feb 10 1 week Feb 15 I '•.
l .
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MI~ESTONES
Responsibility Document Date Required
J. Gill Initial Draft Nov 5
Staff 1982 Field Season Resu 1 ts As Available
J. Gill Draft E xh i b i t E Nov 15
J. Gi 11 Final Draft Jan 12
'"'"···-··-·-... -~ .. fi0!~-11 I .......
$ p ~;
' ' ' < ~
t · ' I ,. •, t7. )! ''" .. ,,.,·.,
J , .... ~ .. ~-···-~·
,.
', <·" .
! ·:
....... ·< ' :
• f
(
Responsibility
R. Erickson
Clerical Staff
K. Young/B. Ecklain
R. Erickson
Clerical Staff
Distribute to FERC
and Agencies
R. Erickson
J. Hayden/D. Blau
Clerical Staff
Contract
Responsibility
R. Eickson
R. Erickson
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 7 RECREATION
Activity
Initial Draft
(Task 6)
Production
Review
Revised Or aft
(Task 11)
Production
Final Draft
(Task 13}
Senior Review
Final Product~pn
Printing
Submit
Gegin
Sept 6
Oct 5
Oct 15
Oct 25
Nov 9
Nov 15
Dec 6._.
~-
Dec 15
Jan 3
Jan 20
Feb 10
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MILESTONES
Action
Duration EnJ
4 weeks Oct 4
1 week Oct 12
1 week Oct 22
2 weeks Nov 8
3 days Nov 12 I
t
w
t ,.
(> 1 week Dec 14
I f,
~~
L r 1 week Dec 22
[ k
I
1 week Jan 10
3 weeks Feb 9
I
I 1 week Feb 15
I
Date Required I .
Initial Draft Ca~pleted ---··~-·· l Oct 22 1.
..
' '
Final Draft Dec 14
r
l
l i ,,~
I
I
I
!
1
I
l
i
I
l
I
I
l.
I .
'
-'
~
..
,. ..
\
Responsibility
J. Chappell
Clerical Staff
K. Young/B. Ecklain
C lei~; cal Staff
Distribute to FERC
and Agencies
J. Chappe 11
J. Hayden/D. Blau
Clerical Staff
Contract
Responsibility
J. Chappe 11
APA, Agency, FERC
J. Chappe 11
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 8
Activities Begin
Initial Draft Oct 1
Production Oct 25
Review Nov 1
production Nov 8
Nov 5
Final Draft Dec 13
Senior Review Dec 20
Final Production Dec 27
Printing Jan 20
Submit Feb 10
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MILESTONES
Action
Initial Draft
Review
Fin a 1 Draft
Duration End
3 weeks Oct 22
1 week Oct 29
1 week Nov 5
1 week Nov 12
1 week Dec 20
2 days Dec 22
1 week Jan 3
3 weeks Feb 9
1 week Feb 15
Date Required
Oct 22
Nov 15
Dec 20
~ !'1 "0
. ~ . . ..
• > j : t ' . >f " ~ •. ,"', ,.'·-."if
~ ~ ~ :
l
'·
!' r f,
''
I I .
I
I
\ t
I I
I
!
l·
I
1
I
l
l
EXHIBIT E
CHAPTER 9 LAND USE
I '
.
IJ
I
I
I
11
I
I;
u
I
11
. , . . "I' j
.· '·(
··; t·.
:11
. j
t
·~
,I]
. '
Responsibility
C. Debelius/
P. Hoover
Clerical Staff
J. Hayden
C • Debe 1 i us I
P. Hoover
Clerical Staff
J. Lawrence
c. Debefiusl ..
P. Hoover
'G. Warnock
Clerical Staff
Contractor
Mi 1 estones
Responsibility
C. Oebelius/
P. Hoover
APA
D. Debelius/
P. Hoover
INPUT~
Access Road Report
EXHiuiT E
CHAPTER 10 ALTERNATIVES
Activities
Initial Draft
Produ~tion
Review
Revised Draft
Production
Review
APA/Submittal
Agency Oist.
Final Draft
Final Review
Final Production
Printing
Submit
Begin
Sept 6
Sept 28
Oct 4
Oct 11
Oct 25
Nov 1
Nov 5
Nov 15
Jan 22
Ja.n 27
Jan 28
Feb 10
KEY INPUTS REQUIRED/MILESTONES
Action
I n i t i a 1 I.J r· a f t
Review
Final Draft
Transmission Corridor Selection Report
Project Operation Selection Report
Duration
3 weeks
1 week
1 week
2 weeks
1 week
3 days
1 week
4 days
2 days
2 weeks
1 week
End
Sept 27
Oct 4
Oct 11
Oct 25
Oct 30
Nov 5
Jan 22
0an 26
·Jan 28
Feb 9
Feb 15
Date Required
vet 1
Dec 6 ;:
Dec 5
l
I
j'
l
l
I j .
I .
[
I . ' . 1.
i
I
l
j
' ' l
I
t
I
l
I
j :
l j •
I
I
I
I
l
I
I ' ' !.
j·
l
I
l
I
I!
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I IJ
i ·I~
.!J
.I
I
I I
l
;
J
':ll
I
0 U T L I N E S
r,
lr
r,
lr
•r
•r .,
. •r
•c
•r-
'lr'
lr l
:l...
I.
I.
!(
~
.: I.
' i
'I
I
I L
l
(
1 -GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LOCALE
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
-Location ........................ ., ........................ .
-Physiography and Topography .............................. .
-.. Geology and Soils ........................................ .
-Hydro 1 ogy ............................................. ; ... , .
-c 1 i rna te .•.....•••.•.•••••••••• e ......... & .................. . -v eo e t at i 0 n . . . . . . . e • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • ...
W·i l d 1 if e ..... ~ . a ••• c. ••••••••••••• ~ •• it •••••••••••••••••••••
-Fish ................................................. .:. .... ..
-Land Use ....•.•...... o••····························•o••••
-·-----·---
Page
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-2
1-2
1-3
1-3
1-3
I
r l (
1
l
l
I ' i
I
l
I I
I
1
l' l
1
!
i
~·
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
Section 2 -WATER QUALITY AND FLOW
1. Introduction
2. Baselin~ Description
2.1 -De vi 1 Canyon to Headwaters
(a) Flows
(i) Flood Frequency
1:10,000
1:50
-mean annual
(ii) Annual Flows
maximum annual
average annual
minimum annual
(iii) Monthly Flows
maximum monthly
average monthly
minimum monthly
(iv) Flow Duration Curves
annual
monthly
7 day low flow
l day low flow
(b) Water Quality
( i) Temperature
open water
freeze up
1:.
"
~· j
'·~
r
I
I
l
i
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
-winter ice conditions
-break up
(ii) Suspended Sediments
(iii) Turbidity
(iv) Nitrogen Saturation
(v) Other Parameters
significant ions
ch 1 orophyll a
nutri~nts
specific conductance
pH
total dissolved
total alkalinity
total hardness
dissolved oxygen
-bacteria
(c) Baseline Groundwater Conditions
-.
(i) Description of Water Table and Artesian Conditions
(ii) Hydraulic Connection of Groundwater and Surface
Water
(iii) Location of Springs, vJe 11 s, and Artes i a-rt··-Fi ows.-, .
(d) Existing Lakes and Streams
( i) Lakes
( i i) Streams
gradient
-substrate classification
(e) Existing Instream Flow Uses
. _,_, ___ ~,-·····-··--·--:-:··---·-:-;;;-;.·,·iiili !p~TfiFFS::;-;~~---· .
~~--~:~. . . .-, >i' · :_/ ~;·:·.;··· ~· ~·.),;~i:~{:/t;,r~ ... · · I
! f.
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
2.2 -Cook
(a)
(b)
( i) Downstream Hater Rights
( i i) Fishery Resources
(iii) Navigation and Transportation
( i v) Recreation
( v) Riparian Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat
(vi) Sanitary and Water Quality Purposes
Inlet to De vi 1 Canyon
Flows
( i) Flood Frequency
-1:10,000
-1:50
-mean annual
( i;) Annual Flows
-maximum annual
average annual
minimum annual
(iii) Monthly Flows
-maximum annual
-avert,ge annua 1
-minimum annual
( i v) Flow Duration Curves
annual
-monthly
-7 day low flow
1 day low flow
l~ater Qua 1 i ty
( i) Temperature
-open water
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
(c)
freeze up
-winter ice conditions
break up
(ii) Susoended Sediments
(iii) Turbidity
(iv) Nitrogen Saturation
(v) Other Parameters
significant ions
chlorophyll a
nutrients
-specific conductance
-pH
total dissolved
total alkalinity
total hardness
dissolved oxygen
bacteria
Baseline Groundwater Conditions
(i) Description of Water Table and Artesian Conditions
(ii) Hydraulic Connection of Groundwater and Surface
Water
(iii) Location of Springs, t~e 11 s, and Artesian Flows
(d) Existing Lakes and Streams
( i) Lakes
( i i) Streams
gradient
-substrate classification
(e) Existing Instream Flow Uses
I
I
.I
I •
I
I
I
I
'I
3.
~-· .. ·~·-
( i) Downstream Hater Rights
(ii) Fishery Resources
(iii) Navigation and Transportation
(iv) Recreation
(v) Riparian Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat
(vi) Sanitary and Water Quality Purposes
Project Impact on Water Qua 1 i ty and Quantity
3.1 -Proposed Project Reservoirs
(a) Watana Characterist~cs
(i) Surface Area
( i i) Volume
(iii) Maximum Depth
( i v) Mean Depth
( v) Flushing Rate
(vi) Shoreline Length
(vii) Substrate Classification
(b) Devil Canyon Characteristics
( i) Surface Area
(ii) Volume
(iii) Maximum Depth
( i v) Mean Depth
( v) Flushing Rate
(vi) Shoreline Length
(vii) Substrate Classification
3.2 -Watana Development
(a) Watana Construction
1':
1' I
I
!o
!
I
I
!
l
'
f
l
l l .
l
!
~ 'I I .
l
I l I
,_~
i
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
I
(i) Impact on Lakes and Streams in Impoundment Area
{ii) Impact on Downstream Flows
floods
annual flows
monthly flows
low flows
flow duration
(iii) Effects on Water Quality
physical parameters (ions, pH, conductance, DO, etc)
temperature
• freeze up
• winter ice condition
• break up
• open water conditions
suspended sediments
turbidity
vertical illumination
(iv) Effects on Groundwater Conditions
(v) Effects on Instream Flow Uses
(b) Impoundment of Watana Reservoir
(i) Impact on Lakes and Streams in Impoundment Area
( i i) Impact on Downstream Flows
floods
annual flows
i nstream flows
monthly flows
• Watana
I
!
j,
I
!
i
f
f
l
! r .
' I
I
i
I
I
l J
\
i
!
I
i
!
I
f '
l
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Gold Creek
• Sunshine
• Sus i tna Station
(iii) Effects on Water Q ality
-physical parameters
-temperature
• reservoir
• Watana to Talkeetna
t Talkeetna to Cook Inlet
-turbidity
nutrients
suspended sediment
vertical illumination
{iv) Effect on Groundwater Conditions
{v) Effects on Instream Flow Uses
{c) Watana Operation
{ i)
( .. ) \ 11
Impact on Downstream Flows
floods
annual flows
ins tream flows
-monthly flows
' Watana
• Gold Creek
• Sunshine
, Susitna Station
Effects on Water Quality
physical parameters
..
I
. f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
temperature
• reservoir
• Talkeetna to Watana Dam
• Talkeetna to Cook Inlet
turbidity/sedimentation
• reservoir
open water conditions
ice cover conditions
• Watana to Talkeetna
-stability analysis
• Talkeetna to Cook Inlet
-stability analysis
nutrients
• reservoir
• Watana to Talkeetna
• Talkeetna to Cook Inlet
-salinity in Cook Inlet
(iv) Effects on Groundwater
(v) Effects on Instream Flow Uses
3.3 -Devil Canyon Development
(a) Devil Canyon Construction -Watana Operation
(i) Impact on rownstream Flow and Stage
floods
annual flows
ins tream flows
-monthly flows
l
I
I
J
I
I
J
I
j
r:=~
l .
!
i f;
l ..
I
L r
t
l
!
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
(b)
• Watana
• De vi 1 Canyon
• Gold Creek
• Sunshine
• Sus i tna Station
( i i) Effects on Water Qua 1 i ty
physical parameters
( i v)
(v)
-temperature
• Watana Reservoir
• Watana to Devil Canyon
• Devil Canyon to Watana
• Talkeetna to Cook Inlet
turbidity
• Watana Reservoir
• De vi 1 Canyon Reservoir
• Devil Canyon to Talkeetna
nutrients
• Devil Canyon Reservoir
• Devil Canyon to Talkeetna
salinity in Cook Inlet
Effects on Groundwater
Effects on I nstream Flow Uses
Watana/Devil Canyon Operation
(i) Impact on Downstream Flows and Stage
floods
-annual flows
ins t ream fl 0\4/S
... I
I
I
·I
I
I
'li l
-monthly flows
• Watana
• De vi 1 Canyon
• Gal d Creek
• Sunshine
• Susitna Station
(ii) Effects on Water Quality
3.4 -Access Plan
(a) Flows
physical parameters
temperature
• Watana Reservoir
• Watana to Devil Canyon
, Devil Canyon to Talkeetna
mainstem
sloughs
, Talkeetna to Cook Inlet
• Cook Inlet
turbidity
• Watana Reservoir
• Devil Canyon Reservoir
• Devil Canyon to Talkeetna
nutrients
• Devil Canyon Reservoir
trophic status
• Devil Canyon to Talkeetna
salinity in Cook Inlet
·, .,
I'
I
I
I
l
• I
I j I
r
l
l
l
J I
I ·-I '··
I
' I
.,
I
.I.
'I.; I
I
I.
I
'I
I
I
, I;'
(b) Water Quality
( i ) Construction
( i i) Post Construction
(c) Instream Flow Uses
3.5 -Transmission Corridor
(a) Flows
(b) Water Quality
( i) Construction
( i i) Post Construction
(c) Instream Flow Uses
3.6 -Summary of Project Effects
(a) Flows
(b) Water Qua 1 i ty
(c) Instream Flow Uses
4. Mitigative, Enhancement, and Protective Measures
4.1 -Watana Development
(a) Construction Phase
(b) Reservoir Fi 11 i ng
(c) Operation
4.2 -Devil Canyon Development
(a) Construction
(b) Reservoir Filling
(c) Operation
5. Agency Consultation
-Appendix -Hater Quality Certificate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
Section l-REPORT ON FISH, WILDLIFE, AND
BOTANICAL RESOURCES
1. Introduction
1.1-Purpose
1.2 -Approach
2. Fish
(a) Baseline Description
(b) Impact Assessment
(c) Mitigation Planning
2.1 -Introduction
(a) Important Species
(b) Threatened or Endangered Species
(c) Contribution to Commerce, Recreation, Subsistence,
and Wildlife
2.2-Baseline Description
(a) Species Accounts
(i) Salmon
(ii) Other Anadromous Fish
(iii) Resident Fish
(b) Habitat Utilization
(i) Watana Reservoir Area
(ii) Devil Canyon Reservoir Area
(iii) Talkeetna to Devil Canyon
(iv) Cook Inlet to Talkeetna
(v) Transmission Stubs and Intertie
I
I
I
I
!
l
r .
I
I
I
I
I
2. 3 -Impacts
(a) Watana Development
(i) Construction
(ii) Filling
(iii) Operation
(b) Devil Canyon Development
(i) Construction
( i i ) Fi 11 i ng
(iii) Operation
(c) Access
(i) Construction
(ii) Operation
(d) Transmission
(i) Construction
(ii) Operation
(e) Impact Summary
(i) Adult Anadromous Fish
(ii) Anadromous Fish Embryo Development
(iii) Juvenile Anadromous Fish
(iv) Resident Fish
2.4 -Mitigation Plan
(a) Watana Development
(i) Construction
(ii) Filling
(iii) Operation
(b) Devil Canyon Development
(i) Construction
I
I r
I
l
I
t
l
!
l
f'
l
I
l
j
i
I
I
I
I
(ii) c·n· • 1 1 ng
(iii) Operation
(c) Access
(i) Construction
( i i) Operation
(d) Transmission
( i ) Construction
( i i ) Operation
(e) Mi ti gntion Summary
C' 1 I Faci 1 :i ty Siting, Design,
( i i) Resource Management
(iii) Monitoring
(; v) Further Studies
3. Botanical Resources
3.1 -Introduction
(a) Regional Botanical Setting
(b) Floristics
and Construction
(c) Threatened or Endangered Species
(d) Contributiori to Wildlife, Recre~tion, Subsistence,
and Commerce
3.2 -Baseline Description
(a) Watana Reservoir Area
(b) Devil Canyon Reservoir Area
(c) Talkeetna to Devil Canyon
(d) C~ok Inlet to Talkeetna
(e) Tran~mission Stubs and Intertie
I
t
I
! '· ,.
r r
l
l
I
i· t
L
".,!
I
j
3.3 -Impacts
(a) Watana Development
I ( i) Construction
( .. ) 1 1 1 Fi 11 i ng
I (iii) Operation
I (b) De vi 1 Canyon Development
( i) Construction
I ( i i) Filling
(iii) Operation
(c) Access
( i) Construction
( i i) Operation
(d) Transmission
( i) Construction
(ii) Operation
(e) Impact Summary
( i) Watana Reservoir Area
(ii) De vi 1 Canyon Reservoir Area
(iii) Talkeetna to De vi 1 Canyon
( i v) Cook Inlet to Talkeetna
( v) Transmission Stubs and Intertie
3.4 -~1i ti gat ion Plan
(a) Watana Development
( i ) Construction
I ( i i ) Fi 11 i ng
(iii ) Operation
:I (b) Devil Canyon Development
'I ;
i· '-'·"
~>< ' )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(c)
(d)
(i) Construction
(ii) Filling
(iii) Operation
Access
( i) Construct·; on
(ii) Operation
Transmission
(i) Construction
(ii) Operation
(e) ~·1itigation Surranary
4. Wi 1 dl i fe
(i) Facility Siting, Design, and Construction
(ii) Resource Management
(iii) Monitoring
(iv) Further Studies
4.1-Introduction
(a) Important Species
(b) Threatened or Endangered Species
(c) Contribution to Recreation, Subsistence, and Commerce
4.2 -Baseline Description
(a) Big Game
( i) Moose
(ii) Caribou
(iii) Dall Sheep
(iv) Brown Bear
(v) Black Bear
j
l
t
l ' r
' l
1 ¥
i
l
I
)
(c) Access
( i ) Construction
( i i ) Operation
(d) Transmission
( i) Construction
( i i) Operation
(e) Impact Summary
( i) Big Game
( i i) Furbearers
(iii) Birds
( i v) Non-Game (Small ) f·1amma 1 s
4.4 -Mitigation Plan
(a) Watana Development
( i) Construction .. I ; ! (ii) Filling '
:I (iii) Operat·ion
(b) De vi 1 Canyon Development
I ( i) Construction . '
( i i) Filling
( i i i) Operation
(c) Access
I ( ; ) Construction
I (ii) Operation
(d) Transmission
:I ( i ) Construction
( i i) Operation
(vi) t~ol f
(vii) Wolverine
(b) Furbearers
( i) Beaver
( i i) Muskrat
I (iii) River Otter
( i v) Mink
( v) Pine t1arten
(vi) Red Fox
(vii) Lynx
(vi i i ) Coyote
(ix) Short-tailed Weasel
I ( x) Least rJease 1 ~
(c) Birds
.I ( i ) Rap tors ~~
r ( i i) Waterfowl
I l,
(iii) Other Birds
i"
(d) Non-Game (Small) Mammals I
!
!
! 4.3 -Impacts I
r I (a) l~atana Development I
I
( i ) Construction
I ( i i) Filling j
i
1' (iii) Operation I I I
I
(b) De vi 1 Canyon Development 1.'
I r ( i ) Construction 1
!
I
i (ii) Filling t
I
(iii) Operation l
' l
I
! ! i
! .'
(
j
I
I
I
' u·
I
I I
I
I
(e) Mitigation Summary
(i) Facility Siting, Design, and Construction
(ii) Resource Management
(iii) Monitoring
(iv) Further Studies
:.:'
-~ • I !.i
!!:fi
'f
,lf -
'Ji4,
I t •. l ..
l l.
1
I
I> !'· I
f
1
l
I
I
i
l
l
I
j
' l
I
l
I
1·
i
I
1
l
l
I
j
1
I
l ,.
t
l
l
I
!
' l
I
I
Section 4 -HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
1. Introduction
1.1 -Program Objectives
1. 2 -Study Area
(a) Archeology
(b) Geoarcheology
(c) Paleontology
1.3 -Program Specifics
(a) Archeology
(i) Step 1.
(ii) Step 2.
(iii) Step 3.
( i v) Step 4.
(v) Step 5.
(b) Historical
(c) Geoarcheology
(d) Paleontology
2. Baseline Description
Field Study Preparation
Reconnaissance Level Survey
Systematic Testing
Analysis and Report Preparation
Curation
2.1 -Archeological Methodology
(a) Literature Review
(b) Cultural Chronology
(c) Research Strategy
( i ) Overlooks
(ii) Lake Margins
(iii) Stream and River Margins
I
t
i l
I
L
l
f,
I
I
1
j
I
(
I i
"' l l
l ' ! .
j
I
I
'I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
II
, •• ,.l
',_ '
f't
(iv) Natural Constrictions
(d) Data Collection Procedures
(e) Application of Data Base
2.2 -Georcheology -Method
(a) Literature Review
(b) Field Study
(i) Aerial Reconnaissance
(ii) Stratigraphic Reconnaissance
(iii) Geomorphic Reconnaissance
(c) Geoarcheologic Terrain Unit Mapping
(d) Data Organization and Compilation
(e) Investigation and Dating of Samples
2.3 -P·aleontology -Methods
(a) Fossil Leaves
(b) Pollen
2.4 -Historic and Archeological Sites in the Project Area Located
during Reconnaissance Level Testing; 1980 through 1982
(a) Prehistory and Hi story of Upper Susi tna River Region
( i)
( i i)
Introduction
Contemporary Sites: 1945 to Present
(iii) Trapping Period: 1920 -1945
( i v)
( v)
(vi)
Goldrush: 1900 -1920
Athapaskan Tradition: A.D. 1900 -A.D. 500
Choris/Norton Tradition: ca. A.D. 500 -ca. 1500 A.D.
(vii) Northern Archaic Tradition: ca. 1500 B.C. -ca. 3000 B.C.
I
I
!.
!''
I
l
l
I
I
l
!
I
!
I
(viii)Americar. Paleoarcti~ Tradition: l ca. 3000 B.C. ? -9000 B . C. ? {
(ix) Early Period: ca. 30,000 B.C. -ca. 20,000 B.C.
I
I
l r .
! ',
~.
I
I
I
I
I
2.5 -
(b)
(c)
Watana Dam and Impoundment
('i) Archeological Sites ~ Results and Discussion
(By Reference)
(ii) Historic Sites -Results and Discussion
Devil Canyon Dam and Impoundment
(i) Archeological Sites -Results and Discussion
(ii) Historic Sites -Results and Discussion
(d) Borrow Areas, Associated Facilities and Areas Disturbed
by Geotechnical Tssting
(i) Archeological £irees -Results and Discussion
(ii) Historic Sites -Results and Discussion
(e) Access Routes
(i) Archeological Sites -Discussion and Evaluation
(ii) Historic Sites -Results and Discussion
(f) Transmission Lines
(g) Other Areas
(i) Archeological Sites -Results and Discussion
(ii) Historic Sites -Results and Discussion
Geoarcheology
(a) Geoa rch eol ogy Terrain Unit Mapping
(b) Glacial -Geomorphologic Mapping
(c) Stratigraphic Framework
(d) Stratigraphic Units
(e) Archeological St1"ati graphy
(i) Lithologic Units (By reference)
(ii) Contact Units (By reference)
(f) Cultural Horizons
(g) Chronology and History
iJ
p
I
I.
I
r <I
l
I
1
I
I
' I
I
I
i
l
l ' l
I
I
l
j
l
I
r .
I
I
I
(h) Mammoth/Mastadon Fossil Discovery
(i) Summary of Geologic History
2.6 -Paleontology
(a) Introduction
(b) Plant Fossils
(c) Poll en
(d) Paleoenvironment
3. Impact on Historic and Archeological Sites
3.1-Introduction
3a2 -Significance
3.3 -Watana Dam and Impoundment
3.4 -Devils Canyon Dam and Impoundment
3. 5 -Bor-row Areas, Associ a ted Facilities, and Areas Disturbed by
Geotechnical Testing
3.6 -Access Routes
3.7-Transmission Lines
3.8 -Other Areas
4. Mitigation of Impact on Historic and Archeological Sites
4.1 -Mitigation Policy and Approach
(a) Avoidance
(b) Preservation
(c) Investigation
4.2 -Mitigation Plan
(a) Plan Details
(b) Estimated Costs of Plan
(c) State and Federal Agency Recommendations
(d) Applicants Variation from these Recommendations
r
I.
I
!
I
!
l
l
l l .
j
l
1 ..
\
I [ '
l I
I :
'
I
I
Section 5 -REPORT ON SOCIOECONOMIC !~PACTS
1. Introduction
2. Baseline Description
2.1-Identification of Socioeconomic Impact Areas
(a) Local
(b) Regional
(c) State
2.2 -Description of Employment, Population, Personal Income
and Other Trends in the Impact Areas
(a) Local
(b) Regional
(c) State
3. Evaluation of the Impact of Project
3.1 -Impact of In-migration of People on Governmental Facilities
and Services
(a) Watana -Construction Phase
(i) Local
-Mat-Su Borough
• water supply
• sewage
• so 1 i d waste
• 1 aw enforcement
• fire protection
• health care
• education
I;
·'''' ·!
.'J <' I,
l•'
I
j.r
I
I
I
l
I
I
l l
I
I
I
l '
!
l
l
! l
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I ·! '
J l
(b)
• public recreation facilities
• transportation
Trapper Creek
• water, sewage and solid waste
o transportation
• police protection
• fire protection
• he a 1 th care
• education
-Talketna
• wate.r and se\'lage
• sol i d waste
• transportation
• police protection
• fire ~rotection
• health care
• education
-Other Nearby Communities
• water and sewage
• solidwaste
o transPortation
• police protection
• fire protection
• health care
• education
(ii) Regional
Watana -Operation Phase
(i) Local
l
i
I ..
I
I
I
·I
'I
(ii) Regional
(c) Watana -Operation Phase and De vi 1 Canyon -Construction
Phase
(i) Local
Mat-Su Borough
• water supply
• sewage
• so 1 i d waste
• law enforcement
• fire protection
• health care
• education
• pub 1 i c recreation facilities
• transportation
-Trapp·_ r Creek
, water, sewage and solid waste
, transoortation
'
• police orotection
• fire protection
• health care
, education
-Talkeetna
# water and se\'1age
• solid waste
• transportation
• police protection
• fire protection
• he a 1 th care
I
!
l
!
I I c·
L
1
\
I
l
I
i
l
l
I
• education
-Other Nearby Communities
• water and sewage
• solid waste
• transportation
• police protection
• fire protection
• health care
• education
(ii) Regional
(d) Watana and Devil Canyon -Operation Phase
( i) Loca 1
(ii) Regional
3.2-On-site ~1anpower Requirements and Payroll, by Year
(a) Watana -Construction Phase
(b) Watana -Operation Phase
(c) Watana -Operation Phase and Devil Canyon -Construction
Phase
(d) Watana and Devi1 Canyon -Operation Phases
3.3 -Residency and Movement of Project Construction Personnel
(a) Number of Workers that Reside in the Impact Areas at
Beginning of Construction of Watana
(b) Number of Workers that Houl d Commute from A 1 te rnati ve
Impact Areas and from Outside the Largest (State)
Impact Area
(i) Watana Construction Phase
(ii) Watana -Operation Phase
(iii) Watana -Ooeration Phase and Devil Canyon
Constructi~n Phase
(iv) Watana and Devil Canyon Operation Phases
(c) Number of Workers that Would Relocate in Impact Areas
(i) Watana-Construction Phase
(ii) Watana-Operation Phase
(iii) Watana -Operation Phase and Devil Canyon-
Construction Phase
(iv) Watana and Devil Canyon Operation Phases
3.4 -Adequacy of Available Housing in Impact Areas
(a) Watana -Construction Phase
(i) Local
-Mat-Su Borough
-Trapper Creek
-Talkeetna
Other Nearby Communities
( i i ) RG g i on a 1
(b) Watana -Operation Phase
(c) Watana -Operation Phase and Devil Canyon -Construction
Phase
( i) Loca 1
Mat-Su Borough
-Trapper
-Talkeetna
-Other Nearby CrnJmu~ities
( i i ) Re g i on a 1
(d) Watana and Devil Canyon Operation Phases
3.5 -Displacement of Residences and Businesses: Type and Number
of Residences and Businesses; Procedures for Acquisition; and
Types and Amounts of Relocation Assistance Payments
(a) Watana -Construction Phase
(i) Local
', ·~oj_
l
\
j'
I '
I '
I
I
(ii) Regional
(b) Watana -Operation Phase
( i) Loca 1
(ii) Regional
(c) Watana -Operation Phase and Devil Canyon -Construction
Phase
(i) Local
( i i) Region a 1
(d) Watana and Devil Canyon -Operation Phases
3.6-Fiscal Impact Analysis: Evaluation of Incremental Local
Government Expenditures and Revenues
3.7-
(a) Watana -Construction Phase
(b) Watana -Operation Phase
(c) Watana -Operation Phase and Devil Canyon -
Phase
(d) Watana and Devil Canyon -Operation Phases
Local and Region a 1 Impacts
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fish
( i) Commercial
( i i ) Recreation a 1
(iii ) Subsistence
Game
( i ) Commer·ci a 1
( i i ) Recreation a 1
(iii) Subsistence
Furbearers
( i) Commerc-ia 1
(ii) Recreational
(iii) Subsistence
on Fish and Wildlife
Construction
User Groups
4. Mitigation
4.1-Local Attitudes Toward Change and Preferences
4.2 -Mitigation Alternatives
4. 3 Per·formance of ~1i ti gati on A 1 ternati ves on Loca 1 Preferences
4.4 -Mitigation Process
i.
L
! .
'
I
I
I
Section 6 -REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES ..:....;.:::..___;::,_;__;...;_------_.;..__ --~::....:=..:....
1. Region a 1 Ge,.') 1 ogy
1.1 -I nt 1'·oducti on
1.2 -Stratigraphy and Lithology
1.3 -Tectonic History
1.4 -Glacial History
1.5 -Mineral Resources
1.6 -Quartenary Geology
(a) Regional Pleistocene Geology Setting
(b) Age and Extent of Quartenary Surfaces in the Quartenary
Study Regions
(c) Key Quartenary Study Areas
(d) Glacial History and Distribution of Quartenary Surfaces
2. Soils
2.1 -Airphoto Interpretation
2.2 -Results of Geotechnical Investigations
3. Permafrost Distribution
4. Watana Damsite
5. Devil Canyon Damsite
6. Rer rvoir Slopes
7. Geological Hazards
. \<
I
7.1 -Significant Features -Siesmicity
7.2 -Reservoir Inducent Siesmicity
7.3-Maximum Gradible Earthquakes
7.4-Transmission Line and Access Route Suceptibility to
Siesmically Induced Feature
7.5 -Reservoir Slopes
7.6-Relict Channel -Watana Damsite
8. Mitigation Measures
8.1-Reservoir Operation
8.2 -Design Features
(a) Watana
(b) Devil Canyon
I
Section 7 -REPORT ON RECREATION RESOURCES
1. Introduction
1.1-Prupose of Report
1.2 -Relationship to Other Reports
1.3 -Study Methodology
(a) Genera 1
(b) Recreation Opportunity Inventory
(c) Recreation Opportunity Evaluation
(d) Site Designation and Recommendations
2. Description of Existing Recreation
2.1-Statewide Setting
(a) Facilities and Activities
(b) Existing Use
(c) Projected Use and Future Facilities
(d) Department of Natural Resources Planning
2.2 -Susitna Basin
(a) Facilities and Activities
(b) Existing Use
(c) Projected Use and Future Facilities (without Project)
(d) Relationship of Project to Existing Use Patterns
2.3-Watana Project Area
2.4 -Devel Canyon Project Area
2.5-Vicinity of Access Areas
c
l ;
l
l !·
l
i
D
k ·~
3. Impacts on Recreation (*Summarized from Chapter 5 -Report on
Socio Economic Impacts)
3.1-Watana Development
(a) Construction
( i ) Reservoir*
fishery
game
( i i ) Talkeetna to Reservoir Fishery*
(iii) Other River-related Recreation
( i v) Other Land-related Recreation
(b) Operation
( i) Reservoir
-fishery*
game*
(ii) Talkeetna to Reservoir Fishery
(iii) Other River~related Recreation
( i v) Dther Land-related Recreation
3.2 -Devil Canyon Development
(a) Construction
( i) Reservoir*
fishery
-big game
( i i) Talkeetna to Reservoir Fishery*
(iii) Other River-related Recreation
( i v) Other Land-related Recreation
0
I l ' l
l
~' ! (
t
!.
l
!
I r .
l
! I
j
1
II
I
II
I!
rl ;1
II
Lii
(b) Operation
( i) Reservoir*
-fishery
-big game
(ii) Talkeetna to Reservoir Fishe~y*
(iii) Other River-related Recreation
(iv) Other Land-related Recreation
3.3 -Access
(a) Construction
(b)
(i) Denali Route (North)
(ii) Denali Route (East-West)
(iii) Gold Creek -Devil Canyon
Operation
( i) Dena 1 i Route (.North)
(ii) Denali Route (East-West)
(iii) Gold Creek -Devil Canyon
Railroad
Railroad
I IJ~
, l!;l 3. 4 -Transmission
~u (a) Construction
( i ) Project Area
( i i) Stubs
(iii) Intertie
(b) Operation
( i ) Project Area
( i i) Stubs
(iii) Irtertie
4. Factors I nfl uenci ng the Recreation Plan
4.1 -Construction Phasing and Access
(a) Watana Dam and Reservoir
(b) Devil Creek Dam and Reservoir
4.2 -Facilities Design Standards
(a) Roads Alignment, Sections and Borrow Areas
(b) Damsite Related Construction Standards
4.3 -Operational Characteristics of the Proje~t
(a) Watana Dam and Reservoir
(b) Devil Creek Dan and Reservoir
4.4 -Management Objectives
(a) Alaska Power Authority
(b) Alaska Department of Parks
(c) Alaska Department of Fish and Game
(d) U.S. Bureau of Land Management
(e) CIRI and Village Corporations
(f) Mat-Su Borough
(g) Alaska Department of Transportation
4.5 Recreation Use Patterns and Demand
4.6 -Physical Opp0~tunities and Constraints of the Land
4.7-Financial Obligation and Responsibility of the Alaska
Power Authority
5. Recreation Use Plan
5.1-Recreation Oooortunities Criteria ' .
5.2 -Development Levels
5.3 Proposed Sites Related to Watana Developme~t
(a) Site One
(b) Site Two
{f
I
i
' !
I
(c) Site n
5.4 -Estimated User Levels -Watana-related Development
5.5 -Proposed Sites Related to Devil Canyon Development
(a) Site One
(b) Site Two
(c) Site n
5.6 -Estimated User Levels -Devil Canyon-related Development
6. Plan Implementation
6.1-Phasing
6.2 Monitoring and Future Additions
7. Costs Associated with Construction Operations and Maintenance
of Proposed Facilities
7.1 -General
7.2 -Construction
7.3 Operations and Maintenance
8. Consultation with Persons and Agencies
9. List of Literature Cited or Consulted
j
~-
1
1
l
I
I
J ,,
!
1
I'~, I,' .,
~ ' ' .
m~.
IW
~ '
'
Section 8 -REPORT _ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
1. Introduction
1.1-Purpose of Report
1.2 -Relationship to Other Reports
1.3 -Study Methodology
(a) General
(b) Dams, Reservoirs and Major Facilities
(c) Roads, Bridges and Railroad
(d) Project Area Transmission Lines
(e) Stubs
(f) Intertie
(g) Impacts, Alternatives and Mitigations
2. Description of the Existing Environment
2.1 -Regional Setting
2.2 -Watana Project Area
(a) Character Type A
(b) Character Type B
(c) Character Type n
2.3 -De vi 1 Canyon Project Area
(a) Character Type A
(b) Character Type B
(c) Character Type n
2.4 -Access
(a) Denoli Route (North)
(b) Denali Route (East-West)
·•
':!l 1'.··.~'~ .. ~
(c) Gold Creek -Devil Canyon Rai*lroad
2.5 • Transmission
(a) Project Area
{b) Stubs
(c) Intertie
3. Visual and Aesthetic Impacts
3.1 -Watana Project Area
(a)
(b)
Construction
( i) Dam and Facilities
( i i) Borrow Areas
(iii) Reservoir
{ i v) Construction Camp and Village
Operation
(i) Dam and Facilities
(ii) Borrow Areas
(iii) Reservoir
(iv) Construction Camp and Village Sites
(v) Watana Town
3. 2 -De vi 1 C\::nyon De ve 1 opment
(a) Constructinn
(i) Dam and Facilities
( i i) Reservoir
(iii) Construction Camp and Village
(b) Operation
(i) Dam and Facilities .
(ii) Reservoir
(iii) Construction Camp and Village
3.3 -Access
(a) Construction
( i) Denali Route (North)
( i i) Denali Route (East-!1/est)
(iii) Gold Creek -Devil Canyon Railroad
(b) Operation
( i) Denali Route (North)
( i i) Denali Route (East-West)
(iii) Gold Creek -Devil Canyon Railroad
3.4 -Transmission
(a) Construction
(i) Project Area
( i i) Stubs
(iii) Intertie
(b) Operation
( i) Project Area
(ii) Stubs
(iii) Interti e
3.5 -Proposed Recreation Areas
(a) Area 1
(b) Area 2
(c) Area n
4. Cost Estim1tes for Mitigation Measures
5. Consultation with Persons and Agencies
6. List of Literature Cited or Consulted
~~'
I
I
I'
I
I ~ ' i
I
j
l
I
!
\
I
jo
I,
I
l
l'
; I
ll' '! ,,
;;:,;
Section 9 -LAND USE
1. Introduction
1.1 -Purpose and App. .ch
1.2 -Current Land Status Issues in Aiaska
1.3-Land Use'Management Planning in the Project Afea
1.4 -Types of Existing Land Use in the Project Area
1. 5 -·summary of Major Anticipated Land Use Changes
2. Description of Existing Laud Use
2.1 -Description of Existing Land Status in the Project Area
2.2 -Description of Existing Land Use Management Plans for the
Project Ar·ea
2.3-Description of Existing Land Use in the Projec~ Area
(a) General Patterns
(b) Land Use Categories
(c) Land Use Activities
(d) Land Use Developments
3. Description of Land Use Changes Resulting from the Project
3.1-Watana Development
(a) L3nd Acquisition
(b) Construction
(c) Operation
3.2 -Devil Canyon Development
(a) Land Acquisition
(b) Construction
(c) Operation
<.{~1
3.3 -Access Road I ,
(a) Watana
( i) Construction
( i i) Ooeration .-,.
(b) Devil Canyon
( i) Construction
( i i) Operation I:
i.
1
Transmission ~ 3.4 -~· ,V;
/(
(a) ·k Watana ~~ f·. ,.
( i) Construction t
r
"
( i i) Operation .
(b) Devil Canyon !
I· t'"-
( i) Construction l
I·
( i i) Operation
a:~. u
Section 10 -ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS DESIGNS_ Al40 ENERGY SOURCES
1. Introduction and Summary
1.1-Study Methodology (Acres/Batelle)
1.2 -Most Probable Alternatives
(a) Chackachanna
(b) Coal at Beluga
(c) Gas
2. Alternative Hydropower Sites
2.1-Non-Susitna Basin Hydro (DSR App. C)
(a) Environmental Screening of Sites
(b) Site Evaluations
(c) Chackachanna Environmental Assessment
2.2 -Alternative Susitna Basin Sites (DSR Section 8)
(a) Potential Sites
(b) Site Screening
(c) Selected Basin Development Plans
(d) Environmental Comparisons of Plans
3. Alternative Facil~ty Designs
3.1-Watana Dam (FR Section 9)
(a) Selection of General Arrangement
(b) Environmentally Sensitive Features
3.2 -Devil Canycn Dam (FR Section 10)
(a) Selection of General Arrangement
(b) En vi ronmenta~lly Sensitive Features
3.3 ~ Access Roads (Access Road Report by 9/15)
(a) Alternative Sites Not Selected
(b) Environmental Consideratioft
3.4-Transmission Line Corridor (Trans. SeTection Report by 10/1)
3.5 -Project Operations and River Flow
(a) Alternative Operation Considered (Project Operation
Closeout by 10/1)
(b) Environmental Impacts of Other Operation Schemes
4. Alternatives Sources of Power
4.1 -Alternatives Studies
(a) Susitna Feasibility Study
(b) Railbelt Alternatives Study
(c) State Long Term Energy Plan
4.2-Sources Considered (Access Study 6 Batelle Tech Summ.)
(a) Gas
(b) Oi 1
(c) Coal
(d) Nuclear
(e) Renewable Technologies
(f) Other Technologies (Feasibility Study 18 Batelle Vol. 1)
5. Alternative Energy Plans
5.1-Plan Components
5.2 -Environmental Implications
I
l
! r
I
l
i
!
l
l '
G U I D E L I N E S
:!
l 11 J -,
1 ~~ l j
l
•
l [~ l " i ; j J
J ll f ~ I l _iJ
·. ~~~l
_J
.. L, .. ,, "I ..
I'.
" j
!:i
r.;;J Procedure Memorandum
-Appfie:a to: Ala~ka Power Author~ty
~Jfectiva Date: September 1981
August 1980
Procedure No: 7.4 lJistribution
Code: Supersedes: Page: 1 of 9
red By: c:: Dnrf" (2roup, Div. ovad By: _...-,...,Q,w.w.:l-~'-----: ________ ..;;... _________ or Position:
Titfe:
FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
I
1 -SCOPE
This procedure sets forth a standard forma,t for preparation,
referencing and compiling the reports and drawings which will
become part of the FERC license application and exhibits.
2 -POLICY
In order to assure consistency and avoid reprocessing time and
costs, documents which will become part of the FERC submittal
will be prepared in accordance with a standard format as set
fot•th in this procedure.
3 -AREAS APPLICABLE
This procedure is applicable to all project p·ersonnel concerned
in the preparation of information which will ultimately be
included in the fERC licen~e submittal, including the applica-
tion, Exhibits A through G (in the revised format) and attachments.
4 -REPORT IDENTIFICATION
4.1-Content of Exhibit Reports
Specific content requirements and procedures for prepara~1on of
the Application for License for Major Unconstructed Project or
Major Modified Project are set forth in Title 18 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 4.41. Specific· ·:.Lms for ~4a.ps an<i
Drawings to be included in the application are set forth in
Section 4.32. These documents should be consulted in the
preparation cf the application~
4.2 -File Numbers
File numbers for exhibit reports will be assigned from the
following series block of numbers from the project file index:
P5700. 15 -Design Transmittals and Reports.
The file number should indicate the task whic'-has primary
responsibility for that exhibit .
I
OC.01.01 Form
c
r.;.;;;;J. P~cedure Memorandum
-Apphas to: ·•
Effective Om: September 1 981 Procedure No: 7 . 4 Distribution
Code: Su~es: August '1980 Page: 2 of 9
Prepared By: S. Rydy Group, Div ..
Approved By: _,--~~-•~""------------....;,---------or Position:
Titte:
FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
Tasks with respons.ibilities for major input to exhibits are:
Task 6 -Exhibits A,B,F,G
Task 7 -Exhibit E
Task 9 -Exhib~t C
Task 10 -Initial Statement
Task 11 -Exhibit D
An exception to this would occur whe~ an exhibit is broken down
into a set•ies of small reports which \'.fill be completed by
different tasks or subtasks. In this case, file numbers will
reflect the subtask authors.
4.3 -Report Numbers
The report numbers will correspond with the file number assigned,
for clar·ity of filing.
5 -REPORT FORMAT
5.1-General
The FERC 11cense application (according to revised content
requirements) will consist of an Initial Statement and seven
Exhibits identified by letter (A through G). The scope of these
documents may range from single-page declaration to a detailed
report of several volumes.
In order to accommodate this wide range, two formats will be
adopted as guidelines. Both formats will conform to the Acres
standard report format with slight modifications to accommodate
FERC requirements. The two formats are defined as:
Used for the larger exhibits which are divided into major report
sections (primarily for Exhibit E).
FORMAT B
More widely used for most exhibits in which section divisions are
not as significant~
I
I
r
Ot1.01.01 F«m 1A 1
~ 1 j
.
u ' ' ' '
'
r~.
Li
r·
L
[i] Procedure Memorandum
AppUes to~ Alaska Po~tter Authority
.__ __ _,,_,. <::rJcd+n;:! 1-fvri':f'n~l~rtr-i,... Pr-r i,::~r:t
Effective Date: November 1981
Supersedes: September 1981
Procedure No: 7 . 4
Page: 3 of 9
Distrib.ttion
Cocict:
Pr&pared By: <:: D~rrh· : • Group, Div.
Approved By: _ ....... ..._~~----: --------~:---------or Position:
Tid a:
FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
I
5.2 -Page Format -FORMATS A and B
5.2. 1 -Margins, Tlpe, Spacing, etc.
All final reports for the Project will ultimately be
printed on both sides of the paper. The left and right
hand margins for all 8 1/2 x 11 inch figures, tables, and
text must be at least one (1 11
) inch. This applies to
original or reduced pages of 8 i/2 x 11 inch size~ For
figures reduced to 11 x 17 inch format, left hand margins
must also be at least one inch. This will ensure
sufficient allowance for binding. Type single space and
use Letter Gothic (12 pitch) type style.
5.2.2 -Paper
Use good quality paper (minimum 20 lb. we.·ight) for report
masters. 11 White Out" wi11 be allowed but it shc.uld not
affect the final reporduction quality.
5.3-iection Identification, ~1ain Report-FOR~·1ATS A AND B
The main body of exhibit reports will conforr-to the format on
the following page. (See also the Subtask 1.01 Closeout Report
for an example.)
I
0...01.01 Form 1A
i t r
l:
1
I
f'i
r l;
I:
!'
l
l 1
l
fl
I'
I
l
I
I
I
I
!
I I
l r
!
j
I
1
t
l
I
i
I l
L
! ' r
1
r
i
!
l
I
l
!
1
l j
l
l
~ Procedure Memorandum
~ Applies to: Alaska Power Authority
Sucdtnrt l-lvch~n,:llot"'i"'l"'it"' Dt'n iP~t
Effectiva Date: November 1981
Supe~~= September 1981
Procedure No:
Page:
7.4
4 of 9
C istribution
C.Qde:
Prepared. By: 5 Rw·~" : · Group, Oiv.
Approved By: _.._~·*IJ .. -----:--------__;..: --------or Position:
~-------------·--------------------------------------·----------~ Tine: FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
T
Example for single space format:
1 -SECTION NUMBER AND HEADING
X
X
1.1-Major Subsection
X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X
(a)
X
X
X
X
X
X
Enumeration x-·
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X
(i) Subsections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1.2-Major Subsection
X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All tables and figures pertaining to a particular section are
placed directly behind that section, not in the body of the
text.
I
0401.01 Form 1A
I
j-. '
' I
I
I
1
I I,,
:II.'\ 1 I • 1 I
j _;
'1
i '1·[;.·; 'J' ~ >'!! '
' ' ! ' l :;J
', ... :1.
,, '
; ., r:
~ •ff
.
• Procedure· Memorandum
AppUes to: Alaska Power Authority
S11c::itnrl HvrfY'nPlP~tri~ Prniect
Effective Date: November 1981 Procedure No:
Supersedes: September 1981 Page:
7.4
5 'Jf 9
Distribution
Code:
Prepared By: ' o""'"
. . . . Group, Oiv. _..._.l:i.I.LI""*""---------------..:-.---------or Position: Approved By: . . . .
Titfe: FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
I
5.4 -Appendix Designation
Many exhibits will include technical, statistical, and other
appendices. For ease of cross reference between exhibits, the
following system of identifYing appendices will be used:
Example: Exhibit E Appendices
Appendix EA -Hydrology
Appendix EB -Vegetation
Appendix EC -Soils
Appendix ED -Water Quality
Appendix EE -etc.
The first.digit identifies the exhibit and the second digit is a
letter in alphabetical series identifying the specific appendix.
The appendix topics are to be assigned by the preparer of the
individual exhibit.
5.5 -Page Numbering
Page numbers for reports, appendices, and included drawinJs will
be used as follows.
5.5.1 -Main report page numbers: Main report page numbers,
including tables should be at bottom of each page in the
following format:
FORt~AT A
E - 8 -142
refers to page number! starting at 11 1 11
for each main section
refers to main section numb~r
refers to exhibit
FORMAT B
B -23
refers to page number, in sequence for the exhibit
designates exhibit
I
()4.01.01 Form 1A
fl·' ; I .. J/
[" : .;
•4
·• t ~ '\ t'-.~~ \
• i
' '
' ( . '
: ~-"
l.
t
l
l[i] Procedure Memorandum
Applies to~ A 1 aska Power Authority
S11c::itnrl HvnY'nPlP~tric Pvoniect
Effective Data: September 1 981 Procedure No:
Supersedes: 1 80 .August 9 · Page:
7.4
6 of 9
Distribution
Code:
Prepared By: ......;~..._~Q,,u~il'l'-l., ____ ....,;,: ________ __:.: __________ Group, Div.
Approved Sy: : : or Position:
Title:
FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
l
5.5.2 -Appendix page numbers:
FOR~AT A and FORt·1AT B
CA -3
refers to sequenced page number within an appendix
appendix designation (see Section 5.4)
5.5.3 -Drawings) page numbers:
Engineering and o~her drawings and maps will be prepared in
strict accordance with p~'"'ocedure No. 7. 1 of the Sus i tna
Frocedures Manua 1. Such items will be reduced to 11" x 17"
format for inclusion in the main report and appendices.
Each separate ~heet wi11 be assigned a page number in
sequence wit the pages of the report where it is included
(see also S·ction 6-Drawing identification, in this
procedurE!) .
5.6 -Tables
The tables ·included in exhibit reports will be labelleJ as follows:
FORr4AT A
Table E.4.3
FORt4AT B
refers to the assigned table number, in sequence
for a main section
refers to main section number
~.efers · h"b"t to ex .. 1 1
Table 8.5
refers to the assigned table number
refers to exhibit
I
o.l.01.01 Form 1A
.['' ..
;
.;
• J
r· ·rr , I
t
[
~e~,
i
I l,.
l
L
[
,.
~·
l
l
[i] Procedure Memorandum
Applies to: A 1 aska ?ower Authority
Susitna Hydroelectric Project
Effective Oate: September 1981 Procedure No:
Supersedes: August 1980 Page:
7.4
7 of 9
Distribution
Code:
Prepared By: S. Rudy : : Groupr Div. Approved By: __ ..;.,a...-:;~----:--------_.;;.: __________ or Position:
Ti'tfe: FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
T
Tables will be assigned a page number according to Subsection 5.5
of this procedure.
APPENDIX (Format A or B)
Table 88.3
refers to the table number, assigned in sequence
for the appendix
appendix designation (see Section 5.4)
5.7 -Figures
Figure numbers will be assigned to all drawings, maps, figures,
and graphs in an exhibit, including those reduced from engineer-
ing drawings to an 11" x 17" format. The reduced draw.ings will
have the figure number leroyed onto the body of the drawing.
Figures will be labeled a~ follows:
F-JRMAT A
Figure E .. 4. 3
FOR~·1AT B
Figure A.5
I
refers to the assigned figure number, in sequence
for a main section
refers to main section number
refers to the exhibit
refers to the figure number, assigned in sequence
for the exhibit
refers to the exhibit
04.01.01 Fof'm 1A
r
l
L
l::
i..l
r L
0
[i] Procedure Memorandum
.Appties to: A 1 aska Power Authority
Swd tnr~ HvrlY"n,:3l13r~r-i r PY"r i,:3~t
Effective Date:
Supersede$:
Prepared By;
Approved By:
Titfa:
September 1981
August 1980
S. Rudy
Procedure No: 7. 4
Page: 8 of 9
FERC Exhibit and License Application Style Guide
Distribution
Code:
Group, Div.
~-or Position:
T ----------------------------~
APPENDIX (Format A or B)
Figure EA-1
figure number assigned in sequence
appendix designation (see Section 5.4)
5.8 -Referencing Other Exhibit Reports or Sections
Cross referencing of exhibits may be made to avoid extensive
duplication· of data., tables and figures. The FERC lic-ense
application content requirements state some specific instances
where referencing is acceptable.
The bibliography, list of references, and footnotes should be
placed at the end of each section of an exhibit. Appendices will
be placed at the end of the pertinent exh~bit.
6 -DR.l\WING IDENTIFI~ ATION AND REFEREN.CES
~·-
The figures and eng·~neering drawings will be pr.epared i.n
conformance with Acres standards (Buffalo Office) and FERC
11 Speci'fications for Maps and Drawings 11 as pres~nted in Procedure
No. 7.1 of this manual. A standard 'Title Bl0ck for Full Size
Drawings to be Included in License Application• will be used for
the exhibit drawings. An examole can be found in Section 7.1
of this manual.
Two blocks of the standard drawing title block will be used for
identifying numbers. The bloci' labeled 11 ACRES" in the lower
left-hand corner will be used for Acres• in-house drawing
identification number. The block in lower right-hand corner
labeled 'Exhibit' will be used for the identifying figure number
assigned in accordance with Section 5.7 of this procedure.
7 -STATUS OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS
The new format for the FERC License Application has been set
forth in Docket No. RM 80-39. Although these are proposed rules
and, as of September 1981, were not finalized, preparation of the
application document will proceed according to the new rules.
FE~C officials are in agreement with this plan.
I
O.C.01.01 FOt'm
c
''·
(
r
[ •\ ,
·'
"[ . . • l
[
[
~"I . !
i
l·
[
r 1
l: ~
l
l .
L
L
[
1 i ·:-:. --~
•, I , , " ' !
~ : . . .
j~~-i
I
I I. E fi~ctive Date:
Su pers:c.ies:
I
Prapared By:
Approve.d By:
Title:
.. .
1
I
I
I
I
I
r. r. ..... ~-,...,. •. .-~~, ·~ l ' • .._. 1 a • '-J 1 C! t t '-~ \.! : t l
c,.~,.tr.;:. Hvdt4 oeloc+~-:-Pt-..,.:~-~ -w-• --··-•J '-L.. .... t.J'-'t-"-'-
S r:.ptom~o t-1001 - -.... , • _, u Procedure hio:
August 1980 Page:
i.4
9 of 9
FERC Exhibit and Licel"'se Appl·ication Style Guide
APPENDIX A
Extracts from Acres Secretarial Manua·l ,
Section 13 -Fonnat and Sanples
Distribution
Code:
I
.
Group, 01\'. j'
or Position:
04.01.01 Futm 1A
' [ ' ;..,.; L ,,
r
r "·'
r
' r
[
~;>
.. r .
,.;-,
~
' [
'\ ...
[
t
l:
[
I j .,_,!,
[
I. ·'·'
[
l~.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
X
X
X
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
X
X
X
1 -INTRODUCTION ~-----------~------~--~~-----------
2 -SUMMARY &~D RECOMMENDATIONS -------·-------------
2.1 -Review of Ice Problems -------------------
2.2 -Specific Problem Areas -------------------
2.3 -Physical Properties ----------------------
2.4 -Control ----------------------------------
2.5 -Effects on Structures --------------------
2.6 -Effects on Navigation --------------------
2.7 -Climatic Effects-------------------------
2.8 -Ecological Effects on Ice Cover ----------
2.9 --Instrumentation----------~------~--~-----
2.10 -Ice Classifications ---~------------------
3 -PHYSICAL PROPERTIES -------------------------·----
3.1 .-Crystal Orientation and Size -------------
3.1.1 -Density ---------------------~----------
3.1.2 -Friction ~----~------~~--~--------~-----
3.1.3 -Strength -~-~----~----------------------
3.2 Field Data Sour.ces -----------------------
4 -FORMATION AND BREAK-UP --------------------------
5 ~ PREDICTION -----------------~--------~--~~-~---~~
L' 1 ::J. -Ice Formation -~-----~----~--------~------
5.2 -Prediction of Ice Break-up ---------------
6 -POWER GENERATION ----~~--~--~-----~~~---------~~~
6.1 -Intake Trashracks ------------------------
6.2 -Penstocks and Turbines -------------------
6.3 ~ Radial Gates --------~~--------~----------
6.4 -Valves afid Screens -----------------------
6.5 -Transmission Lines -----------------------
6.6 -Surge ~Chambers -------------~~----~----~
6.7 -Ground Water Freezing--------------------
6.8 -Intakes -~------~~-~-----~-------~~-~~-~--
6.9 -Well Screens ~--~~~~--~-~~-~---------~----
6.10 -Water Supply Distribution and
sewage Collection ----------------------
Paae
1
3
4
4
.s
5
6
7
8
9
9
10
ll
12
12
13
14
14
15
16
17
17
19
19
20
22
23
24 ~-25
25 !
l
26 l t
27 l
l•
I
I
30
I! ' .>r .. t
:•
i ~-' .'" ;
'·
[
'
~~
i.
" ~~
~
1:'
""
, I ~~ ~-
I'
!
[
.. I
I.
i;
I.
! I ~~,:,,~
(_.
[
L
l
(
•
\ .._
Table of Contents 2
Page
7 -EFFECTS ON TRAFFICABILITY ------------------------31
7.1 -Ground Transportation ---------------------31
7.1.1 -Ice Airstrips ---------------------------33
7.1.2 -Ice Ladings for Pulpwood ----------------36
8 ~ COSTS AND BENEFITS OF LAKE EFFECT SNOWFALL -------
8.1 -Costs ---------~~-----~----~-~-----~-~--~--
8.2 ~ Benefits -~-~-----~~-----~~---------~---~--
8.3 -Comparison of Costs and Benefits ----------
9 -FORCE ~~ASUREMENT --------------------------------
10 -ICE SENSING FROM ORBITAL PLATFORMS ~--------------
10.1 -Present Weather Satellites --------~-------
10.2 -Future Satellites -------------------------
10.2.1 -Past Satellites -------------------------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
X
APPENDI~ A MARGINAL. ECONOMIC COSTS OF POWER
E,y COMPONENT AND TYPE OF DEMAND
APPENDIX B -LOAD DATA
X
TABLES
FIGURES
PHOTOGRAPHS
NOTE
!0 table ~4 veAy 4hoAt,
double 4pa~e all ~~em4.
37. ,
37
38
39
41
44
45
47
48
lrJ
:_JiJ
'•:
, IU···
. "
. ,'
~~ j
1:'1
I
_j
I''
" 1:
~~
~I'
~J
I'
~ l.
1 ..
I [,
:[
·: [
/
J
' 1 -SECTION NUMBER AND HEADING
SPACE-AND-A-HALF REPORT
X
X
1.1 -Instructions
X
Note that the foreg.oing samples of prel imindry material are ·standard for
all docume~ts--whether i" single-j 1-1/2-o·r double-space typing.
X
The following items are also standard.
X
- A Page Outline fer Raports must be used as a guide to correct placement
of material.
X
-Each MAIN SECTION starts on a new page.
X
-MINOR SUBSECTION HEADINGS and TEXT are ·indented.
X
-Indent 2 spaces for MINI HEADINGS and TEXT ~~~ ~hat these i terns are
distinguishable from the ~:1ain text ..
X
The instructions which follow relate specifically to space-and-a-half
typing of reports and proposals.
X
-Return carriage twice betHeen PARAGP.APHS.
X
-Return carriage 3 times after SECTION HEADINGS.
m.
If;
~Ml
I
1:
I.
li
IJ
Ill
[,
(
-Return carriage 3 times before, and twice after MAJOR
SUBSECTION HEADINGS.
-Return carriage twice between ENUMERATED ITEMS, such as
(a) 1 (b) 1 (C) 1 {i) 1 (ii) 1 (1). I (2) 1 (3) •
-If ENUMERATED ITEMS have a heading, return carriase twice
between HEADING and TEXT.
-For ENUMERATED ITEMS which are small, text may commence
on the same line as HEADING.
-Return carriage twice after series of ENUMERATED ITEMS.
-Return carriage twice before and twice after each MINOR
SUBSECTION HEADING.
2
-Return carriage twice before and twice after MINI HEADINGS.
-Return carriage twice between MINI ITEMS.
-Return carriage twice between ITEMS {such as appear here) .
-Return carriage once if such ITEMS are short.
Mechanical Department
-Hydraulic Department
Electrical Department
Secretarial Department
Civil Departme.nt
Return carriage 3 times before and after TABLES appearing
within text ..
,,
~.-'~"!t4i; '. ~ • ._-:r~ ~: I
fl.
. •r. ·I\
;
t I'··· f;
!
,I
,,
2 -SECTION NUMBER AND HEADING -
SPACE-AND-A-HALF F~PORT
X
X
2.1 -Major Subsection
X
3
:.
Regional geological studies and regional geophysical surveys
of the country were the main source of information for this
area, together with informal discussion with members of the
Institute •
There is no known deep borehole information available for
this area.
X
{a) Enumerated Items (short) There is no known deep bore-
hole information available for this area.
X
(b) Enumerated Items (short) -There is no known deep bore-
hole info:rmation available for this area.
X
X
2.2 -Major Subsection
X
In predicting the subsurface geology, the only information
available to the geologist is from geophysical survey work
(gravity and magnetic) and stratigraphic correlation.
X
(a) Enumerated Items (long)
X
X
A well-consolidated conglomerate horizon may be found
near the base of the lake, composed of pebbles derived
from the fossils.
(i) Shaly horizons are likely among the predominant
rock types, which are probably grits.
··'
\
L
I
IT 11
·~ 11
~~
·;·II ~., I
f
I
• I
I
I
I
I
(,
I,
X
X
(ii) It should be possible to build the intermediate
reservoir within a grit or graY'vacke bed.
(iii) The chances are low that this anomaly represents
an intrusive Lody at depth.
(b) Enumeration
X
X
X
(i) Development of cleavage planes in rocks inter-
. sected by the shaft is likely to be related to
rock type. Certain rock types may prove diffi-
cult owing to the cleavage impressed on them.
. 2.3 -Major Subsection
X
X
X
X
X
2. 3.1 -Iifinor Subsection
A map is available from the Institute. A recent aero-
magnetic s~rvey is available at scale 1 inch to 1 mile.
More refined gravity studies on a detailed grid could
also be made over the area.
2.3.2 -Minor Subsection
A detailed magnetic survey would be required to out-
line the intrusion.
Information on rock strength, quality and permeability
at depth would be required.
IInL-nediately after logg5.ng, the te~t pit was backfilled with
excavated material. Permeability depends on degree of
fracturing at depth.
4
i
l
j
f !'
f
1;
~ I;
r f
I
1
l
I
I
1
l
I
I
I
1
I
L
r
I ,,
I
l
I
i
l
j
t l .
)
l
f
l
!
I
I
I
I
fJ.
ll
~~
~~ '
I ' '
I
I '
'
I
'".ll
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
\ ..
Immediately after logging, the test pit was backfilled with
excavated material. Permeability depends on degree of
fracturing at depth.
X
X
2.3.3 -Information on rock strength, qu~lity and
permeability at depth would be required.
2. 3 .. 4 -Immediately after logging, the te~:t pit was
backfilled with excavated material. Perme.ability
depends on degree of fracturing at depth,
Immediately after logging, the test pit was backfilled with
excavated material. Permeability depends on degree of
fracturing at depth.
r,;
!
!
l
l
I
I
f
i
l' ' J
l
!
l
1
J:'.~.
l l
l i
(.
~·
' If.
11
l
I
I
. ··~
(
(
.3 -SECTION NUMBE:R AND HFADING -
SPACE-AND-A-HALF REPORT
X
X
From the inspections, site investigations and analyses re-
ported herein, the following conclusions have been reached.
(a} The full length of the north wall of flume No. ~ is
spalled and deteriorated to the extent that repairs
are required in the ~~ediate future.
(b) The integrity of the length of wall between the dam
and the stop logs is ctf crucial .importance as it musr:
be considered to be part of the dam structure.
(c) Beneath the spalled and deteriorated surfaces, the
concrete in the walls is in good condition and can be
considered to·be sound and adequate for a gravity
structure.
(d) The bedrock is sound and gives no concern regarding
stability of the walls.
X
Downstream from stoplcgs, the north wall requires remedial
work to halt the deterioration and to satisfy the design
criteria.
X
X
3.1 -Major Subsection
X
6
Resi$ti vi ty su.rveying Cl?uld i.ndicate the presence of faulting.
The area in question is one of moderate to low relief. It
consists of gently dipping Me·sozoic sediments overlying a "
lower Paleozoic basement.
m ..
I
I
11 •
I
11
I
I
. ~
I a
\
··m 'I
f
I
a
a
a
~
m
I
I
The area in question is one of moderate to low relief. It
copsists of gently dipping Mesozoic sed~~ents overlying a
lower Paleozoic basement.
X
X
X
x·
Mini Heading
This is known from borehole intersections. It consists
of gently dipping Mesozoic sadiments overlying a mainly
lower Paleozoic basement.
Mini Heading
This is represented by Jurassic and Triassic strata ~om
prising sandstones, marls, limestones and clays.
Immediately after logging, the test pit was backfilled with
excavated material.
X
In the sinking process,.the concrete lining operations
follow closely behind the excavation, while in the raising
method concrete lining can only be installed afterwardse
X
(a) Although shaft sinking contractors will have winders
suitable for sinking shafts to the depth envisaged,
the winders will not be able to cater for the high
outputs.
X
(b) Since shaft sinking will be a critical activity on the
construction schedule, a rapid rate of sinking will be
desirable to ensure early commissioning of the overall
scheme.
X
The main factors which have led to improved sinking rates
include team organization and high quality equipment.
7
('
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a '
1
' a
\
Cl
! Dl
a
a
I a '
a
a
a
a
4 -SECTION NUMBER AND HEADING
SPACE-AND-A-HALF REPORT
x
X
8
Tables which appear within text should be clearly separate
from that text and from ea~h other.
X
X
TABLE 1
EXAMPLE OF. SPACE-AND-A-HALF
TABLE APPEARING WITHIN TEXT
X
X
Materials
Labor
Etc
TOTAL
X
X
TABLE 2
EXAMPLE OF SPACE-AND-A-HALF
TABLE APPEARING WITHIN TEXT
X
Plant
X
A Generating Station
B Power Plant
(two plants)
c Generating Station
(3 plants)
D Generating Station
(4 plants)
Estimated
(Can $).
000,000 .
000,000
000,000
000,000
River
A River
B "
c "
D It
Cost
(U.S. $l
000,000
000,000
000,000
000,000
Distance
Upstream
from City
(mil~s)
14
21
21-3/4
15-l/2
·~ '
>~ -:~ .....
:-\· ~·
!t
i.; ' 'l'' ~
"' ,'\ -,z·
,_......_
~
BORDERS
.:3 PEN
-7/8"
~PEN
-
6 1/8 11
ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY ~~~~E~:5N
r #00 PEN
SUSITNA HYDRQ,ELECTRIC PROJECT ~~N~~k~~
EXHM3.1T 0
TITLE 240-#~I PEN
CENTERED
CENTERED
175 #2 PEN
CENTERED i75 * 2 PEN PLA l'E 000 200 # 3 PEN
~-~1------~~·----------------~----------~--------------~--+
3: 1/2'' I !I 1L2" . ~-"·'-_____ __;:;.~--=-------............. ~t-------=-:.L--=----·------!IiiJo..t
::
10
' ---------------------,---------------------------------------~~-~~
STANDARD~ TITLE BLOCK FOR
11 C11 SIZE !DRAWINGS (26 x 37)
.·
0 0 PE ·!"' 0
N
/cBID -~ BID
DOCUMENT PERIOD
t +
FINALIZE EVALUATE RECOMMENDED
BID 1+-..
BIDS AWARD DOCUMENTS
/oBID I ~ BID
DOCUMENT PEkiOD
t t
PREPARE BID ~ FINALIZE EVALUATE _.. RECOMMENDE.O _..,.. DOCUMENTS FOR BID
EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTS BIDS AWARD
/oBID I BID
DOCUMENT PERIOD
t ~
~
PREPARE BID ~ FINALIZE EVALUATE ~ RECOMMENDED
DOCUMENTS FOR BID BIDS AWARD EQUIPMENT DOCUMENT
/oBID 7 ~ BID
DOCUMENT -.. PERIOD
t t
FiNALIZE EVALUATE RECOMMENDED BID BIDS ... AWARD DOCUMENT
TYPICAL BOX DIAGRAM STANDARDS
"
AWARD-f+-CONTRACT
y
AWARD f-+ CONTRACT
f-+ AWARD
CONTRACT
.\WARD ->-CONTRACT
80-#000 PEN
itO PEN
' ,,
(
I .. .
I/4".J \...#I PEN
CONTRACT DESIGN
PACKAGE
DESCRIPTION 100-:f:-100 PEN ~ CENTERED w
> * INDICATES· w 1-a:: :z SUPPLY ONLY w
(JJ ct ::::E
(JJ z 0 ~ < 0 u -1-..J 1--z 0
(.) <: w 0
(.) >--::::E 1-1-u.. ::J z
..J a: (.) w3: . < UJ 0 :::Ew
:::> > 0 W-a z z a:>
::JlJJ
::::E
(!) (!) ua: ---w (/) (I) 0 w IJJ a:<f
/ 80-#000 PEN 1-0 0 a.o x-4i'= 0 PEN -
M-1 TURBINES a GOVERNORS A X X X 1/4':...~
M-2 POWER INTAKE/OUTLET,GATES ETC. A X X X ..
M-3 SPILLWAY GATES r c#OOOO PEN 8 X
M-4 DIVERSION TUNNEL GATES 8 X
M-5 LOW LEVEL RELEASE GATES a Ll"' 2:R 8 X
M-6 * DRAFT TUBE GATES 8 X
--
M-7' * DRAFT TUBE CRANE 8 X
M-8 * SURGE CHAMBER STOPLOGS a FOLLOWER 8 X
* TAILRACE STOPLOGS 8 FOLLOWER 8 X
M-9 FIXED CONE VALVES A X X X
. .
8 X M-10 STEEL LINER a RING FOLLOWER GATES
M-Il PENSTOCK LINER 8 X
M-12 POWERHOUSE CRANES 8 X
M-13 * DOMESTIC WATER a SEWAGE SYSTEMS -X
M-14 * FIRE PR'JTECTION PACKAGE . A X X X
M-15 * COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM 8 X
M-16 * OIL HANDLING SYSTEM 8 X
M-17 * DRAINAGE a DEWATERING c X
M-IS * GENERATOR COOLING SYSTEM A X X X
M-19 * PIEZOMETER PIPING SYSTEM 8 X ..
M-20 * HEATING, VENTILATING, a COOLING SYSTEM c X
M-21 POWERHOUSE ELEVATOR a MAN HOISTS -X
M-22 * MACHINE SHOP EQUIPMENT -X
tk23 * MECHANICAL 'INSTALLATION -X X X
1/16 ..
TYPICAL SCHEDULE TYPE DRAWING STANDARDS
3/16" I l/2"l I l
80· #-000 PENl m 1/4"-, TITLE 140 #I PEN FIGUR 0 CJ;:NTERED
'
I
I
I
tl
r
IJ 1..
" t J
I
-I"
.. I
!I
! ;
II
l
Jl
I
jl
11
"" •• Jl
•• -·-~
l/4" _j
STANDARD LAYOUT FOR
ll"x 17 11 DRAWINGS
• •oo • ~ ~-•> -I< ., F >
1/6"-
3/16" .. , I l/2" . ,.._
!~;0 PEN'\ r;;f~
FIGL ' . 0 l11~to:
'C
"-.t'
I l
@
J
12
11
8.5
8
AUTC ...
~ANUJ
.1.
FEED
a
u
c
u
c
c
c
0
c
c
u
u
0
c
a
t• (
'
The following guide for references should be used in conjunction with
the preparation of Exhibit E.
Book
Mishan~ E. J. Cost -Benefit Analysis, George Allen and Unwin,
London, 1975.
Article
Baumol, W .. J. 11 0n the Social Rate of Discount 11 , American Economic
Review, Vol. 58, September 1968.
Report
Acres American Incorporated, Susitna Hydroelectric Project 1980-81
Geotechnical Report, prepared for the Alaska Power Authority,
Fe-bY"uar·y, 1982.
Personal Communication
SRI International, personal communication, October 12, 1981.
References should be noted numerically· in the text at the end of the
sentence. They should be numbered consecutively by sesti9il and listed
in numerical order at the, end of the -sectiOfl. c.hc:..(Jfe.,...
c.J.tt~~.(JfQ.r
I
l
I
I
I
l-
I
i
! ·=I