HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPA3556HYDRAULIC IONS
AND ITAT
1 E RI SI
R
r:
ITY
1
TABLE OF
LIST OF FI
LI
LIST
I,.
I I~
TABLES ....... G ~ 0 •• 0. & 0 ...... G" -ll 0. 4 0 ••• 0 G ........... 8. ~ •••••••••. 0 0
INTRODUCTION ••..• e••· ••ooeeoeeee<J~fi\418
I
D
Data
Anal
Si
Site
Si
Si
Si
Site
Si , .
.... 1
Site
Si
Si
Si
Si
Site
Si
Si
Site
i
Si
Si
SI
NSTEM DISCHARGE, SI
cation and In 1 at ion. $ ...
. "" "
•••••••••oc4itOe
FLOW
..
vi
xii
xiii
XV
I-1
II-I
II-1
II-3
II
II
II-7
II-9
I-10
II-10
II-1
II-1
II-11
II-2
II-
II-12
II-
II-2
I -12
II-12
II-13
II-13
II-13
II-13
II-13
II-14
II-14
II-14
II-14
II-
II-35
I I I. CALI
I
AND I ON IFG HYDRAULIC MODELS ............. ~
ION ....
In
ral
General
General
llation
iques
iques
Techniques
and Data Collection.
for Hydraulic Model
Hydraulic Model
Hydraulic l
Calibration ..
Veri cation ..
ication ...
Si 101. 2R., o sa e •., o o • o e • t A • o •,.. .o • e a -a a & e-.c;. • o Goes eo u o eo o • • o o e • • e
Si
i
ion ......
101 ..
Site ion.o
1ibration ..
cation .. ..
ion .... .,.
112 .. 6L
ion ........
119.2R ... ;ll,. •••• $ ••
Si sc ption.~
libration ...
Ve fication.
Appl i ion
131 7L ..
Si ion .. .,
li ion.
fication
ication .. ~
c •
" . "
i i
I -1
III-
III 11
I TT ... ... .!.
I I-
III-18
III
III
III-32
I I
I I I
III
III-
I I I
III-
III
I I I
I I I
I I I
III
III
III 2
I-73
III 6
III-79
I I I
I I I
III
III-91
CONTENTS
Site 132. ·······$············4\ll·······••-a••··········•••:a.••
Site Description.
libration ...
Ve cation.
ication .... . . .. .
. ..
. . ., ..
Site 136 .. 0L ... ••••••••••ooeaooeeoo•••ooo•eeoooe•o••••••o•o•;e
Site
!BRAT I
Site Desc ption ...
ion Cl .... ,, ...
cation .. ..
J~pp 1 i cation .. ., ..
Site Description.
Ca 1 i brat ion ....
Verification ..
ication ....
.. .. .,
~ e· e e
Site Installation and
General Techniques
General Techniques
Data Collection ............ .
for OIHAB Model Calibration .•..
for DIHAB Model Application ••
Si 01.,7L ............................................. 6,. ............................... ,. ...... .
Site Description.
Calibration ...
ication ...
Site 105
Si
15. . 1 ription.
Cali tion ....
ication .. e
'114.1R. o o e eo G ceo o eo-& e
Si scription.@
1 ibration .. c
lica ion.
iii
III-93
III-93
III-95
III-102
III-102
III-105
III-105
III-109
III-111
III-111
III-1
III-117
III-120
III-121
III-121
Site 115 .. 0R ........... .. ••oe••••••••
Si
Si
Si Oesc ption ..
ion~ .. Calib
Appli ion ..
1
Site ion.~
1 ibration ....
i ion ..
pt on ..
1 ibration. ~
ication.,
Site 1
Si
Si
s ii
Si
Cali
1
Description .. $
tion.,
ion ...
ion ....
ption~ ..
libration.
i ion ..
133 .. 8R~
ion ....
ion .. ,
.....
....
....... "
~ .. "
" .
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
s i te 138. 7 L 4 Q. ftil •••• e • @) 0 • Q ID 8 ••• 0 .., • 0 0 Q 0 • IB e 8 & ~ e ••• 0 •• 18 e •• e • G 0 .... ~
~·· . 0 . t• .... ~ 1 te esc r1 p 1 on ............................................ o ................. 6 ...... .
c:a 1 i brat ion"" " " ...... " ..... " .. " 0 " " 0 " 01 • " .. <II .. 0 " .. "" • " .................. " " 0
~lp p 1 i cat i 0 n" o o e ., o o <> 0 II 01 0 II 9 1\1 It 10 0 0 II> e " <I e fl II> 0 <II 0 01 e <II 0 0 fl " <> " 9 I 0 0 0 0
s i te 1~ 3 9 • 0 L •••• 0 • 0 • e • ., ••• e 0 •••• 0 a 0 0 • a •• 0 ..... 119 • e •• Gil • 0 ... G & e • 0 •
~· •t 0 . t. """), e escr1p lOneaa~oG,$4JOGeeaCrDG$GOGG0004DGOO«Joooee¢149G'
c:al ibration. 0 0 e e G $ e & 0 0 0 8 e a fa ¢10 til 0 G 0 G e 0 0 0 0 It 0 G 0 II 61 t1. 0 a Q D 8 fJ 0 e
P~p p 1 i c a t i on .. .. ., .. .. • .. * .. .. ., ., .. .. .. .. , .. .. .. .. $ e .. .. .. .. ., .. .. .. .. .. .. • " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. •
s i te ], 39 0 4L .. 0 Ct 0 0 ilt <l'j 0 0 .. 0 e Q -G m e .£) • 0 0 •• II) 0 ... 8 e c 0 ,; 8 ID •• 0 G e • G 0 0 • 0 ., • fJ •
("•t 0 . ,.. ~1 @ eSCr1pL10n.,o••••••o•e•o•••••$•••••••••~••••••o•••
c:a 1 i brat ion .. " " .. " 0 ..... ., " ....... " • " .. " " ..... " .. e " 8 .... e .. " " .... " .... " ... ..
Ap p 1 i cat i on ...... ., o .. .. .. .. ., ...... ., .. " .. 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... o .. .. .. .. o .. " • .. .... , .... ..
REFERENCES. c • o o a a o-e eo ta "e e-• • o o e eo e eGo o e co e c a o • e fie o o • o o • B • eo o e-£~ • c • • o o o o o
APPENDICES
Append·ix A ... Summary of site-specific data collected to develop
relationships between mainstem discharge, site flow
and water surface elev ion
Appendix B Data suppo ing calib ion and application
IFG hydraulic
Appendix C -Da suppo ing calibration and application
DIHAB models
v
FIGURES
re II-1.
re II-2,.
gure I I
II
Figure I I
re II
re II-7.
Figure II
re II
Fi re I I-0 ..
F i re I -11.
re II-
re II-14.
Middle ver study i
ow durations curves r June, July t August,
September based on mean ily Susi River
discharges d Creek, 1 1984 and corre-
flow va ues for mean monthly
' 1981 ~ 1 1) e e e 4Jo -9 f> 0 0 0 -Q 0 tf & 6 6 til 6 'd:• 0 0 GP
Rel ionshi mainstem di
flow water su el
section 8 site 101.2R ••• •u••o•••
on
Stage
between mains
r surface
at si .SL.~.
, site
ion r cross
rge curves for cross ons 1, 3
II
II
II-15
II-16
and 4 101. oe•ocoo~eae o••••e••••o•ae.e••• II--
Stage
4 at
onshi
and wa
7 at si
curves cross ions 1 and
oe•eeoec-e-oo-oeo••••••••••o•i;"l.t.:te
discha , site
on for ctoss
rge curve
site 1 .1R.oo~5$······
cross section 2 at
r cross on 1 at
curve r c ro s sect i on 2 at
d scharge curve for cross ion 2 at
119.1L •••oo:za.•«••••••••fteQoe•• .,
i rna i nstem s
evation
discharge curve for Cl"OSS s
ationships mains di
a water ce elevati
section 2 at s G2R co•o•qo6
curve ross
130,.2R
, site
r cross
ion 1
rge, s i
for cross
ion 2 a
II-
II
II 1
II-21
II
II-22
II-23
II-
II
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure II-15.
Figure II-16~
gure II-17.
Fi re I I -18.
Figure II-19 ..
Figure II-20.
Figure II-21.
Figure II-22.
Figure II-23.
gure JI-2£ie
Figure III-1 ..
Figure III-~ ..
Figure III-3.
Figure II-4.
Stage discharge curve for cross sections 1 and 3
at site 13le3Lec.eeoeeeeoooeeeo•egeooetl'C~oo-e~oecoooeeooe
Relationships between mainstem discharge, site
flow and water surface elevation for cross
II-26
section 3 at site 131 .. 7L ........... ~~o~·~·····o•oa••····.. II-27
Relationships between mainstem discharge, site
flow and water surface elevation for cross
section 4 at site 132.6L .......... a.o•••a••a·-·····•e•&e0
Stage discharge curve for cross section 3 at
site 133.8R ... 0 & 0 0 0 II e 0 0 Cl"' e s .... .a 0 ~ e 0 e (l •• @. G jfl 0 ~-De 8;; 0. c (p ~
Relationships between mainstem discharge, site
flow and water surface elevation for cross
SeCtiOn 4 at Site 136oOLQo~o~e~oo~e~o~oooGc&oo~eoocao
Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1 and
II-28
II-29
II-30
2 at site 137 .. 5R ........................................... ., ... o.................. IJ ... 31
Stage discharge curve for cross section 2 at
site 138"' 7 L. " .. " ...... " " G ...... " .. " ....... " " " e " .. " .... " .... " a ...... " ..... e I I-32
Stage discharge curve for cross section 2 at
site 139 illl OL ••. e "' 8 Q @I 0 • c 0 • e • c; & " & 0 a @ 0 ••• til ti •• 0 G G '31 Q 0 0 (; 0 Q $ •
Stage discharge curve for cross section 2 at
S i 139 o 4L e o o o Q ar o c o o o e o o o o e -e e e e 6 e c o e o o e o & e c o e o • t'f. ~ c o c
Relationsh·ips between mainstem discharge, site
flow and water surface elevation for cross
section 4 at site 147ulloeo••·~·GG06·G-~OO.&OO•o•oooe
Middle ver IFG and DIHAB modeling sites ... G.oo•··~·
Juvenile chinook salmon suitability criteria for
depth applicable to clear and turbid water
II-32
II-33
II-34
III-1
habi tsQ Source: Schmidt et al. 1984.8.eo··~··~·e· III-27
venile chinook salmon suitability criteria for
velocity a licable to clear and turbid water
habitats.. rce: Schmi et al .. 1984 9 ~WT&A
and 198 5., ............. 0 " " ...... ., ., G c ., .... ., <> Q ..... o " .............. " ~ I I I .... 2 8
Cover suitability crite a recommended for use
in modeling juvenile chinook habitat under clear
a rbid water conditions. Sources: Schm·idt
al. 1984, EWT6A and wee 1985sQeooe••o=•••• GO®G689 III-29
vii
Fi re I I I -5 ..
re III
Figure II1
Fi re I I I -8.
Figure III
Cross sections r 101 .. 2R study site depi ing
evations at calibration dis-
and 279 ............... GOOOOOOO$eee•o• III-34
Comparison between measured and usted cross
sections 1, 3 and 4 101.2R study site .••.••...... G III
son of and i cted r
profiles from calib model at 101.2R
site .. fl •• $ 1t 4ll ••••• 0 0 G • 0 ..... e ••• 6 •• 0 0 •• e 0 • e 0 G • D 0 I I I
Comparison
forecast
the
surface
the cali hydraulic ls and
ow relationship for 1.2R cross
section 0 •• ~ 0 • e • ., • '& e G • G • $ ••••• 9 •• 0 •• s e •• e • 8 • u ~ ••• 0 • Q I I I
Proj ons of
juvenile chi
di
s surface area and WUA
salmon habi as a function of
for the 101.. modeling site •. ~··~ III
re I I I -10 .. me of j le chinook mon WUA
20 to
Figure III-11.
re III-12 ..
as a on of di
September 15, 1984 for
from
modeli
q s si depicti
ions at calibration dis-
III-46
cf..;)~~~-·o••····e&•··········· III
observed a predi
1es from calibrated model
wa
101 .. 5L
III-51
Fi re I I I-13., Proj ions gross surface area of
re III-
i re I I I -15
Figure III 6 ..
III-7
juvenile inook salmon bitat as a ion
me
discha r the 101. modeling si III
juveni ·r e
discha
for 1 ..
inook salmon WUA
from May to
modeli si •........ e
ions for 1 2 study si icti
elevations at calibration dis-
5, 355, 721 and 1 s .......... .
measu a usted cross
III-56
I I I
at ll2 .. 6L s i te.. • . .. .. . . . . . .. .. I I I
i
III 5
i i j
re III-18.. P ons gross su
juvenile chinook salmon habi
area and WUA of
as a function of
discha the 1 modeling si e~·~ .... III
Figure III-19. salmon WUA
as a ion of rge 20
September 15, 1984 for 112.6L modeling s te •• G ........ III-69
Fi re III-2~0 .. Cross sections for 119. site ng
su ions calibration d s-
of 316 III
Figure III 1., Campa son between measured usted cross
re III
Fi re III
gure III
re III 5 ..
Figure III
re III
Figure III
re III 9
gure I-
sections 1, 2 and 3 119 .. 2R study site ...................... III
Campa rison of
surface les from cali
p ons of s su
juvenile chinook salmon
discha.
Time ots j
as a ion of dis
area and
water
119 .. 2R
WUA of
as a function
.. 2R modeling si "
salmon lfiUA
20 to
• e • e
September 15, 1984 for 1 modeling s $\lJ41108090 ..
Cross ions r 131 .. site de pi
surface evations calibration d
of 18, 55, 1 and 240 e<DQOe&Go¢'eO
Campa son between measured and
sections 2 6 and 7 at 131~7L s
usted cross
rison a
pro les from calib
water
calibrated
rela onship
i water
model at 131 7L
elevations
1 i c model clnd
111$7L Cr()SS
ions gross
uvenile chinook
ce area a
itat as a
of
.. ion of
di r 131 .. 7l modeli si
salmon
ix
III-75
I I I
III-80
III
III
III-89
III-90
I I I
III-
re III-31.. Cross sections r 132.6L site depi ing
gure III
III
Figure I I I-
Figure III
su elevations calibration dis-
charges of and 141 ·············Q·············· III-96
Comparison
section 9
measured and usted cross
s i tee B G 0 8 G 3 'Ct \l G 0 Ci $ fil fl 0 0 II e 0 e.
son of served icted
profiles from cali model at 1
III
site ········••oeeo&eaoeoooeo•••••••••••••oeoGO III--100
wa surface ions
the ca 1 i hydraulic model and
low relationship r 132.6L
cross on 3 ............................... ooeeeiOOO<O ....... III-101
Proj ons of
juvenile chi
dis
area and WUA
as a function of
.6L modeli site .....• III-104
III-36.. me ots of juvenile chinook salmon WUA
Figure III
re III-38.
Fi I I-39 ..
re I I 1
Fi re III
as a on of di from 20 to
September 15, 1984 for 1 modeling s te .... e ...... III-106
Cross ions
surface
of 81, 1
SP. ri es
a funct
¥>;;;11U ....... r 15,
.. OL s si depi ing
d
from calib
at calibration s-
water
136 .. 0L
wa u ce ions
ca 1 i bra hydraulic and
relationship for 1 .OL cross
gross ce area a WUA
salmon habi t s a function
r the 1 modeling si
juvenile
disc
r 1
X
salmon WUA
20 to
III-1
III-110
III-1
III-115
. III-116
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure III-43.. Cross sections for 147 .. 1l study site depicting
water surface elevations at calibration dis-
charges of 1907 and 5600 cfs ................... ~ ..... m .. eooee=o=e III-119
Figure III-44. Comparison of observed and predicted water
surface profiles from calibrated model at 147 .. 1L
study site .......... ~ .... " ........ <) .... .,., ... ., .. ., ........................................ III-122
Figure I I I-45.. Projections of gross surface area and WUA of
juvenile chinook salmon habitat as a function of
discharge for the 147 .. 1L modeling site .. e~·· III~124
Figure III-46. Time series plots of juvenile chinook salmon WUA
as a function of discharge from May 20 to
September 15, 1984 for 147 .. ll modeling site ... ~······= III-126
xi
LIST OF TABLES
le II-1 ..
Table III-1.
Table III-2 ..
Table III
Table III-4 ..
Table III-5.
Table III-6~
Table III
Table III-8 ..
Table III-9 ..
Table III-10~
Table III-11 ..
T le III-12.,
Table III-13 ..
Identification codes for staff gages ........... eQ•····· II-6
Description of habitat transformation cat-
egories .. Source: Aaserude et al. 1985 ... na•~······· III-4
Types of hydraulic models applied at 1984 middle
river modeling sites for rearing chinook.e .. ~-9-·G··D· III-3
Substrate code classification .... & •• ~.~··$···••c•••a$• III-12
Cover code classification .................. ""0 ........... ,,............. III-12
Cover sui tabi 1 i ty cri ter! a recommended for use
in modeling juvenile chinook habitat under clear
and rbid water conditions. Source: Schmidt
et al. 1984 and EWT&A and wee 1985 ••.... ~············ III-30
Hydraulic data available to calibrate IFG-4
model for site 101.2Ro&GOG~········&···••aeeeoooo•••• III-37
Hydraulic data available to calibrate IFG-2
model for site 101.5L.e.QG$0···~o••o~················ III-49
Hydraulic data available to calibrate the IFG-2
model for site 1 Q6LG50&&8QOGOOGGOa$~~·······•e••••• III-61
Hydraulic data available calibrate the IFG-4
model for site 119o2R ••• eoo•••e••••••vo••··~oeoeQ···· III-72
Hydraulic data available to calibra the IFG-4
model for site 13le7Lea••~••••••e•~Q·D~Q··-~~··•w•e&a III-86
Hydraulic data available to calibrate the IFG-4
model for site 132.6L.~ .. ········o~~ .. ···~· oooeeoOm9 III-98
lie data available to calibrate the IFG-4
model for si 136.0La••·~··········•·e····· .. ···· •e•o III-109
Hydraulic data avail le to calibrate the IFG-2
for site .. ll ................................................. ~~···· III-120
xii
LIST OF PLATES
Plate III-1.
Plate III-2.
Plate III-3 ..
Plate III-4 ..
Plate III-5 ..
Plate II!-6 ..
Plate III-7~
Plate III-8 ..
Plate IV-1.
ate IV-2 ..
ate IV-3 ..
Plate I
Plate IV-5 ..
a I
Plate IV-8.
Modeling site 101.2R on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfsm••·····3·······=···8············ III-33
Modeling site 101s5L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs ............................... ~ .............. III-47
Modeling site 112~6L on September 6, 1983 at
mainstem discharge: 16,000 cfs ...................... o~···· III-57
Modeling site 119.2R on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs ............ ~~oeoeeoeGG~~··Q&OOOOOO III-70
Modeling site 131.7L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs .......... ~············~········· III-81
Modeling site 132.6L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs •. a···~···o···············Q······ III-85
Modeling site 136.0L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs .. ~·····~················~o•••e•e III-107
Modeling site 147oll on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs ..... s&~······•Goeeoooeeoca~u·•·· III-118
Modeling site 101.7L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs ...•......• ~oooooeoeeeeoeee~·····
Modeling site 105o8L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfS.soo~OGOGO&OO•eoeeooee•ooo~oo&•ao
Modeling site 114o1R on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfse•~········•coee•~····••oco~•o•••
Modeling site 115.0R on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
discharge: 23,000 cfs~--~ms&e~•o•••·····~·······~·····
Modeling sites 118.9L and 119.1L on June 1, 1982
at mainstem discharge: 23,000 cfSeeGO~&eQo~eeooeeea6eO
Modeli si 125o2R on June 1, 1982 at mainstem
dis rge: 23,000 cfsa~o900G e&&moaoe•eeDo•eeeeeosOGQO
i .,g site 130. 2R on September 6, 1983 at
mainstem discha 16,000 cfSoe•0~890800G~WO~GOOSGeOo
deling si 131.3L on June 1~ 1982 at mainstem
is rge: 23,000 cfSeceeeoo• .... &eO<o~···· .............. O~D~GQ
xiii
Pl IV-9.
I 10
I 11
Model i s i
scharge:
1 • 8R on
23,000 cfs.
si 1
I~ 1982 at mainstem
June 1, 1982 at mai
sites .7L, 139oOL 1 .4L on June
nstem di rge: ,000 cfs ..• ~.~$·4·$ 6
X V
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Preparation of this report was funded by the aska Power Authority as rt
the 1 icensing i es for the proposed sitna Hydroel c Project.. The
a
s
i neer~ environmental studies being conducted to suppo
ication r license are directed by Harza~Ebasco Susitna int re.
Su ~ded essential support the successful completion of
d studies, tati curve anal is and model c.alibra on.. In addliti11n AD
lead responsibility data se management and preparation three
ces i ch accompany the 1111 in text.. The ADF&G Su Hydro staff who
rticipated in the fi d ies, analyses, a report preparation are listed
ow:
s ific
ier
Connaughy
Sheehan
developed
tion moje1 cali
a time series pl
len
Donna
Alice
rson
er
ngham
Buckholtz
Freeman
numerous computer
ion. In addition
pro9rams
produced
len Bingham selected
ich
s tistical anal as se necessa to t degree
i ls were calibra ia it ion is g1ven Kafen
ier r 1 i rati curve ana ysis a ing s ion I I is
as well as coo inati t ich su the
ration of this we
XV
is
a
in
res
caul
as
PART I
INTRODUCTI
presents data reduction methods and resu 1 ts of thE~ 1984 fi d
E .. hey a Associates ( EWT&A) and the ask a
Game Su ro ic Studies GrL (ADF&G Su ) in
1 nyon segment of si River ( ddie River).,
es and analyses described in were completed
and AOF&G Su study the rna responsibili r
i ca 1 i brat ion and prepa ion of is
are r·espons i bi 1 i and do necessa
inion the as of Fish and Game ..
h bi na 1y occu vari Jns in streamflow
ively eva1 solely by monitori a s as 1 a
si re !I at the onset of 1982 eld
"s ~ sh ldli Service s Instream ow Incremental
(I I 1982) was se 1 ected as a means of fying
PHABSIM is a ts c in streamflow.
IFIM i can a li
i i ions a t cor·respondi ng amount
s r sel speci 1 i stage. The PHABSIM modelinG -'
r use in se s i ti'Jns re t ow regime a
ure are t rs i avai·t ili
19 r rams inc the I
I-1
I lie s and The p m
i lie 1 th species s ific i t
c a to cal a weighted e areas ( ) ' an i ue i
availabili potential sh on O\v.
i i is are 1 imited uvenile
salmon and chum salmon 0 ..
i 1 i i rna eva ion s ies
va es i to
si 1 spawners. ,
ical habi va ables are
ing rea habi i 1
2 i 1 s wre ca ra r eight si nne1s
ram foi"'ecast influence
1 in j i rea bi
i versi " 1 ) was
cu i measured velocities ream-
0\.VS i r lie simul ion s in
ns se is nci 11y rmined ow effects on
01 was i at rna ns margin areas
eva ua i uence mains tern is on
-i t~ I
is cons is i t on a ree techn cal ions,
ical i ri eld and
ica u model res uvenile i a
spawning chum habitat to incremental changes in streamflowo The first tech-
nical section (Part II) describes the stage-discharge and site flow analysis
which presents various relationships between mainstem discharge, site-specific
flow, and \va surface elevation that are extensively used in subsequent
analyses to: appraise the accuracy of calibrated IFG models, estimate site-
specific water surface elevations at modeling sites for different mains tern
discharges, and conve the rna i nstem hydrograph into a s i te-speci fi c flow
raph ..
In rt III of this report, calibration procedures for the eight IFG hydraulic
1 s are described in deta i 1 and WUA forecasts obtai ned by 1 inking the
ca 1 i b hydraulic mode 1 s to the HABTAT mode 1 are presented for juveni 1 e
chinook.. Suitable rearir.g conditions for juvenile chinook are dependent on
cover low to moderate velocities.. Susitna River conveys glacial
runoff ring the summer growing season, and the associated turbidities
provide cover for reari chinook (Schmidt et al .. 1984).. Therefore, under
natural conditions, object cover (such as provided by substrate~ debris 3 or
ove nging tion) is rally not as important a factor to juvenile
i in tu d water habitats of middle river as it would bE~ in a large
non glacial river. Habitat suitability criteria f0r cover, velocity and depth
u in is are based upon da collected in Mi le River habitats
a 1 .. 1984) ve been rived as desc bed in EWT&A and \~CC 1 5 ..
i t r juvenile inook at ea s site is expressed as the
relationshi WUA a mainstem dis In additi ime series WUA
o s on 1 USGS reco of a daily streamflows for the
Susi River at 1 Creek are provided i icate the temporal s i 1 i ty of
rearing conditions at the study sites throughout the open water growing season
(May 20 -September 15)o
Pa IV of this report presents the evaluation of chum spawning habitat usi
the direct input habitat model (DIHAB) developed by EWT&A~ The availability
of chum salmon spaltJning habitat is highly dependent upon the presence of
lling and suitable substrate (Estes and Vincent-Lang 1984)~ Although the
1 ion upwelling areas is general fixed, use of these areas by spawning
chum is i uenced by mainstem dischargee High velocities maty periodically
limit the availability upwelling areas 51 or abnormally low mainstem
sc rges during the spawni season may dewater or limit access to upwelling
areas ..
Since most of the reported chum spawning in side channel and mainstem habitats
occurs al shoreline margins or in
depth is the ncipa1 variable influenci
va ri ion in discharge.. Hence the di
r areas {Barrett et ale 1984),
the response of the WUA curve to
input habitat model (DIHAB) ich
can utilize si pecific stage-dis rge relationships as input data was
chosen over the IFG hydraulic models whi also require detailed measurement
of veloci for r calib ion ..
b t sui i 1 i ty c te a r spawni chum salmon used wi the direct
in t model are bas on ta lected in mi le rive (Estes and
Vincent-La 1 a review inent ·1 i terature (S rd 1985) e
s ing habitat is scri at each site as a relationship between
a rna i ~1s dis rge, as well as by time se es p ots based on 1984 average
ly st ow reco for sitna River Gt ld C
I
PART II
RELATIONSHI BETWEEN MAINSTEM DISCHARGE,
SITE FLOW WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
I
StJS i 1 c project would alter the ra'l flow ime
of e i ver, uenci mai lira r su
elevation (s ) which in stage and ow in side areas ..
wa
d season,
rface evations at
ff gages were install
mains tern si channe 1
moni in
sites (Fi re
II-1). Si s i c ta were co 11 ected to
ow and wa r su
op rel ionships
ma"!n discharge, si
re 1 i onshi
us i 1 oga ri
can
ive of this
mon wa r surface
si i c
a) mains
c by dis
formed va ables~
on 1
on at mai
flow measu
stage mains tern
on. ra ly,
nuous linear regression equations
mi e ver modeli s es was
and si channel sites a
develop tative relationships
di (WSEL vs .. Q); b) si ow
a (q vs ) and c) si ow a mainstem di (q vs .. Q).
are ively in the calib on a lication
u 1 ua rea itat ( III of this ) ' and
i in s r salmon ing
th~i s ) .
II-1
Fi re II-1.
138 7L. 139.0l.
1 :.l9.4l
132.6L
,..,.,-...--131.7L
0
To tteeff\
131.31.
130.2R
Middle river study sites.
0 0
~------~~---~ MILES
II-2
Flow duration analyses are useful in comparing discharge magnitudes of a
particular year to those occurring over the historical period of record ..
Figure II-2 shows the range of mean daily discharges at Gold Creek between
1950 and 1984 for the months of June, July, August, and September, as well as
the percent of time flows were equalled or exceedede
The 50-percent exceedence va 1 ue represents a typi ca 1 medi urn discharge, the
90-percent, a typical low discharge, and the 10-percent, a typical highc The
exceedence value corresponding to the mean month discharges during the years
1, 1982, 1983, and 1984 are also shown in Figure II-2.
METHODS
Staff gage location and installation: Leopold and Stever1s staff gages,gradu-
ated in 0.. foot increments from zero to 3 .. 33 feet, were installed at all
ling si dur·f August 1984.. ff gages were located on each cross
ion wi in IFG s sites to facilitate obtaining \'\later surface
eleva ons wi surveying 1 distances when collecting multiple sets of
calibration data from the hydraulic models$ Often as many as three tiered
s ff gages were installed per cross section to span the variations in WSEL
wa-s associated within"'-the range of mainstem discharges being monitored.
s was su to a eleva on (project tum) previous
t middle ver by Consulta s, Inc .. from 1980
1982. is allowed conversion of site-specific water su ce
elevation readi s a common e evation the middle river.
II
80000
73000
66000
~ 59000
52000
45000
38000
31000
a
24000
17000
10000
0 10
80000
June
20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100
Percent fo Time lled Of' Exceeded
20
ly
30 40 50 60 70
cent Time ll or ce
rat i ens curves r June,
on mean da ly i
' 1
values
1
r
a
mean
19 82
1983
II 1984
80 90 100
d
Jul , us ,
"er d sc
ndi
I
72000
64000
~ 56000
48000
32000
u
.~ 24000
a
16000
eooo
0
0 10 20 30
Percent
80000
72000
64000
~ 56000
48000
~ 40000
'-~ 32000
u
-~ 2~1000
a
16000
aoao
0
0 10 20 30
ent
gu II
August
40 50
Time
Septe
T' , 1me
reek
values
50
60
all or
ber
50
alled or
70 80 90 100
Excseded
1984
70 80 go 100
Exce d
I I
ff locations were identified river mile {RM), location thin
s1 , position rel ive to ow level (hi , medium, low) and associated
cross ion (Table II-1).,
e II-1 .. I ca on codes s ff gages"
on in Si ow level Code
M Hi A
Si 1 s ium B
w Low c
Si H
X
i Sites p
were typically in 11ed a surveyed a knOYin e 1 on in
r when ium ow were be because
1 s t rE~amfl ows ..
ion. Staff i ngs were ined at ree to ve di rent
mai discha 1 s rough r eld seasone
Gage was the nea res 0 .. 01 r su elevations were
su di leve1i nearest 0 ft if
re ' a du cross section .i su
Si s c suremen tai one cross section in
model ni 0 ree d1 rent mains discha s dis
I I
cross ion 'It as 1 ocated in a stab 1 e ion of site re
oc. di ion rema i ve1y constant over a range
Most sc r cross ions were located at head of a e or in
transi on zone a e a run ..
ow measuremen were obtai using a
c ow ' or ce meters .. measu
were across c·r·oss ion
accordance standa
oci was rpendicular
Si ow was calcula wi
e computer usi the formula·
q :: )
i=
d.
1
= depth cell
i dth of eel
:: oci ce i
= ow a le of
re i res s
i ADF&G
ra i 1 s ows r s
20
U.,S .. cal
cross section,
a
(
i
i
ce
1
i
1
calcul
) X a.
1
i
ion st
(ve icals}
rvey .. If
the f1 ov~ le
r or an
measu
Aquatic ies res
ver at Gold were
ows ..
in
was
-20
nua1
i s i a at c (U
s n rges 'tJe 1a a t a lysis
n n nces rapidly s or 1 i mai
and wa r on were in a
as 1 su ion is was i mean
i ld Creek {x-ax s) for r
su elevation :i versus mai were
so I s Each was visu<~lly
,. if necessa erroneous were corrr ~
on ions between
i es were cal us
e
i severa 1 r
a i
i flow ea
inspection ae
' I ., rev were
fe r na 1 ana 1 s rm
regress ions na
i s stage a ins sc is
i
s nne not
or non-reac re
is s used
uence s reac -
the i or a c ser-
(r"S non i ons also ass
ins ow s
mains i si
i i es .; 1 t
t ons in the si In
i s-
ross at
al,.
Si s \va ti s were i
..
.t
d Creek was
y 8,
c ins s
~ i nnels v
, oca l
a c
local Hence l"e i
i s
s at s s1
F
une ~ J s
1 3 rce ve
is mains ') grea
rea is at t
r on
t s nts
curves occur a reas
nc t F
ions (si i c wa s elevation versus main
, s te ow versus si s fie \va ter su e evation
us on one I l
si si c wa r su eva ons
are 1 rect 1 si
{ Fi res I res 1 1 1 7
on versus sc ots cross on
d eros 1 p t .a
i ression ons
i III-j s
a
are n
ich main
s c same
rs
A area ow cross section
cross on 2 mainstem or less
cross ion al ri i of the 1
9 ow ave grave 1 r
c s section 1 .. ons 2 are on
s·i is b
i g n I -5) ~
rs t
10 h 1 s ~ e
F re
a
s i
si a at 12 31i
main
res
s s
s
s
sc
isc
ow
si
r c
I I 1 )
s
e
sc
s
1
tr:· \ . 1
s
can
ons
a
s
d s
t
ow locations 9 a
9, rs s ons
is controll at all cross ions ischa rea
re
Si d b
a 1 ins s
F re II
Si s whi si b a
i i ss J.
ons 5 5 up nea s
is s c F·i 1
c at lowe ross ions s inf
mains
nne s s cons low a sc a
as
on a
re
s di grea
extreme distinc
s t
are ove ac ght or
d ve ii or s nne at hi ows crros
is relatively cons t s r·e 1 a i onsh
t mains ra 5:;
F i ~--e I I -19) ..
s ow 11, ow is main 1 i
ischa rea r n 11 c
u tr·eam t si ( Fi II O\v
r at si i ca enou n
s s re ionship si
s L: mai s s is cons nt rou ra of
va 1 le ( Fi re I \ J •
s 0\f,l is mai i s si at d sc s 1ow
2 ~ 1 i + c nnel '-'
is ove i d is re a
versus Q re 1 at ons ip in Fi re ? £... ..
i ne 1 sha is cons t ran
la e F re I
i ~ is la s c nnel i cont 0 rna s a L
g 5 c Li si 1 t si c nne .... t ..)
1 cha ne ~ r f mai stem even at
relations ps ow" s cl sc , a
ce e e ti are va t mai s
c g I ' I •
i
l
l .;:: 98
s
i
r 15
8:
0 99
n "' 3
COUTR0LL£D
disc
s
n
Fi
OACKWATEH
5 f 000 Q (. ~ 600 c ts
I,JO [QUAT I ON DEVELOPED
!3RE ACHED
9,000
viSEL
0 " B 000 c f ~
.25 .G7
MA I f~STtH Ol SCHARGE
a disc
i 101.7L.
curves for cross sections 1 3 a 4 t
A: IJQ IJACKviAHH
BACKWAT
9 ·'
MAI NSTEM D l SClifiRGE:
gu
r.ru:o< llDOOCFS i
I I-. 0 dis a
sit 101.7L~
GflG£ 102. OP2
NO BACK\'IATEH
5 4... 0 9~ 600 c
HO EQUATION DEVELOPED
BACKWATER
9,600 0 < 35 fs
WSEL c 1 95 o0 ·65 + 367
100
1'1fH NST£11 OI SCtiAF<GE CRE:.tK llOOOCnn
curves for cross tions 1, 3 and 4 a
lOO
tiAlNSTEH O!S.CHfmG£ CRfl:K l lOClOCfSl
Fi re I I a curves
S ~ I
l05.5P1
A:
5,000 ~ 0 24 cfs
WSEL ¥:: 10~0.2.4 o0 ·37 + 395
c
+ 395
MAl NSTEH OlSCHAHBE
r cross ions 1
1.00
n ~::: 0
at
r 1 = i.OO
fl g 2
B
i re te
7
a
si
§
c...
1.11 to
~
!..
~
X
ue
A: NOT CC~ •OllED
5,000 Q ~ 0,000 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
0: COtHIWLLED
8 1 800 ( 0 4 19,000 cf~
A
\~~ilL 1 ? · 116 o0 ·GO 1· 1+95
10
1.00
~
MfUN5T01 OlSC~IRRt:U: fiT GOLD CRET..K (]000CfS)
Figure II-8 .. Stage discharge curve for cross
section 2 at site 114.1R.
NO BACKWATER
5,000 ~ Q ~ 10 1 400 cf
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
BACKWATER
1 O,ltOO ~ 0 ~
W S E L g 1 0-1. 5 ft
MAINSTDi OJSCHftRGE:
Figure II 9.
A
B
rl ~ 0.97
n .:: 15
CROJ( ( 1 OOOCfS)
curve for cross
115.0R.
H6.9Pl
5,000 0 4 23,000 cf5
WSEL lo-'·37 o0 ·72 505
Ul
z = 1,00
n 12
NAINST£11 OlSCHARGE AT GOLO CR££)( tlOOOCfSl
Figure II 10. disc curve cro
ion 2 at site ll8.9L.
s.ooo ' 0 23
WSEL 10~T QO.SO 505
lOO NAlNSTLM OlSCHARQ£
Fi e II-11.
/
curve
te 19.1
cro
BACKWATER
5.1'000 :: 0 "'
re I -
cfs
+ 50S
1.00
.00
=12
i
on 3
ow and
si
II
2.~--------------~------·----------------------~
Figure II-13 ..
6 ~ 21 0 ~ 0 ~ 2 3 g 000 c h
WSEL c: 10~i.0 9 o0 ·44 + 552
N~INSTEH OISCHARGf.
r:t c: 0.98
n = 8
CR£EK ( 1 OOOOfS)
Stage discharge curve for cross section 1 and relation-
ships between mainstem discharge~ site flow and water
surface elevdtion for cross section 2 at site 1 .. 2R
r~ a 0.99
n a 3
A: NOT CONTROllED
%,300 <.. Q '-
q .. 10-=zs. Is
0: CONTROllED
6,210 '!. Q '
1.3'6
-------------------------------------------~
NOT CONTROLLED
,.,300-0 l..
WSEL "'
8: CONTROllED
re I 13 ..
r2 = 1.00
" 10
A: NOT CONTROLLED
4,300 L 0 6,210 efs
q m '!l}::l .. l 7 (WSEL =
B: CONTROllEO
ion
ite
2
A
rl ~~~ 1.00
n -2
B
= 0.96
at ion-
a
125
II
=·?-----------------------------------------------~
A: NOT OREACHEO
~ 0 " 100 ch
EQUATION DEVELOPED
8: BREACHED
, 6,100 : 0
WSEL • l
cfs
'•9 + 600
HA!NST£H DISCHARGE
Figure II 14,
CRfD\ r lOOOCfSJ
cross
2 at si
A: NOT CONTROllED
,:: 0 tt 1 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVElOPED
0: CONTROllED
1011 700 < Q C. 23 5 000 ch
WSEl = 1 o0 ·29 + 610
U1
= 0.98
n m 5
MRINSTEH DISCHARGE AT GOLD CREEK £1000CfSJ 100
Figure II 5. discharge curve crrss
ions 1 and 3 site 1
~ I
~ I r2 0.96
,..J I n =-1 """
I l I
CONTRC:.l..LED
7 1170 <. 0 L. 21 ,oro ch
• t.14 03.3t q =
CRflX [ loooe'"Sl
·~·~----------------·--~---------------------~
w w
A: NOT LvNTROlLEO
S,OrQ ': 0 '-7 1 470 ch
NO E lATION DEVELOPED
6: CONT :LLED
Fi re I
;;; g
o._
c
, si
i 3
II
10.700 '-0 &... 21.500 ds
,0 -14. if> , ·.,.93 Q ;lll l >4
~~----------·--------~----------------~
A: NOT CONTI~CllED
5,000 ~I) t_ 11 ~900 ch
NO EQUATION DEVc:LOPEO
0 '-23 iOO cfs
llll 0.98
n a s
28 26 + 620
Fi re II-Relati
1"1 ""' 0.99
f'& "' 3
mainstem discharge, site
ion cross section 4
.. _
ow a
at si
II
Fi
A: NOT BREACHED
S,OOO ~ 0 ~ cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
0: BREACHED
9 000 < 0 <. 11
• -.62
II-15.
cfs
57
r2 = 00
n = 3
discharge curv ss
ions 1 and 3 site 131.
WSEL
a:
igure II-B~
645
0.97
10
CONTROllED
0
-19 ..
a 0.98
• 5
mai
i
0.99
fl D IJ
"35,000 eh
f.WSEL c
flow
t si
I
WJ !,J
1'1
'
ur-----------·------------------------·----------------~
A
A; NO BACKWATER
5;000 _:: Q •t 11 ch
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
U: OACKWATER
11,000 ~ 0 ~ 35.000 cfs
WSEL u 1 O .. l7·ll o0 • 89 + 667
Figure II a dis
site 137.
rge cu
~r---·--------------------------------------------------
137 1P2
A~ NO BACKWATER
5n000 ( Q { 11~000 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
61\CKWATER
11~800 _ Q: 35,000 cts
NO E~UATION DEVELOPED
r cross s 1 1 and 2
B
"r-----~------------------------·-------------------
19~ 900 ch
o1 0 1.slf? 705
Fi~Jure II-21. curve
at si 138.
cross
•>,r---------------------
1]1' I
A~ NO BACKWATER
5,.000 t. 0 4 11.800 ch
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
BREACH EO
A
11 ~BOO '-0 <-35,000 ch
WSEl = lo-2701 o0 ·64 + 705
~ 0.97
Ill; 1
Figure II-22 .. discharge curve for cross
section 2 ite 1 .OL.
fifiGC l 3' I 1P 1
Figure II 3 .. s curve r s section 2 at site
r1 11'11 1.v0
n :~~ 3
~~--~------~~~----·-~------r-1
GAGt: 111. em
I n = 3 °
/
SsOOO '-0 ._ 35,000 ch
, $ 10~·84-{WSEL ~ 810}3 "44
~ 1~10 n:rn :o
-r-------------------------------------,
CONTROLlED
5.000 L 0 I.. 35,000 ch
wsEL .-,o-n·77 + a1o
-,
Fi re I I Relationships between mainstem discharge, site flow and
r surface elevation for cross SE·ction 4 at si
ell~
II-
DISCUSSION
The relationships between site flow and middle river discharge were developed
for mainstem controlled conditions at each study sitee High regression
coefficients and genera 1 knowledge of the sites indicate the re 1 ati onshi ps
expressed as logarithmic regression equations are reliable over the range of
mainstem discharge for which data are available& Inspection of aeribl
photography and fami 1 i a ri ty with the sites provided sufficient ev ide nee of
flow conditions outside the range of available field data to extend the
relationship somewhat beyond the range of available field data.
II-35
PART III
CALIBRATION APPLICATION
OF IFG HYDRAULIC MODELS
The ddle river modeling analysis may be viewed as consisting of thr~ee steps ..
The ini al step involved the collection analysis of ologic data to
dt:termi ne the seasona 1 distribution of fish by species and 1 ife phase in
mi e river habitats and to identify the behavioral responses (or prefer-
ences) of life phase to physical habitat variables. This work was principal
conducted by ADF&G Su Hydro during the 1982 1983 field seasons (Schmidt et
al. 1984, Estes and ncent-lang ) ..
Second, the study sites are established represent typical habitats and
cient field data are collected to descri anticipated changes in
ical habitat conditions due to streamflow alterations" With re~gard to the
mi e river modeling studies, hydraulic simulation models are extensively
(
si 1
to forecast a icipated changes in depths and velocities .. Calibration
ication of these hydraulic models is the subject of this section of
i
e
e river modeliryg ( ) repo ..
involves
1) in
ication habitat suitabili!ty criteria
in
is anal
evaluati
nation
fish habi
is is facilitated
other habitat va
calibrated lie models to
to incrementa 1 changes in depth and
using the IFG model ich is
1 such as te compos i on
cover. Habitat response to streamflow variations is portrayed by an index
called weighted usable area (WUA). WUA forecast are presented for juvenile
inook at each study site in this section of the report but will be discussed
in a subsequent report by EWT&AD
ifferent hydraulic models were applied in the MRM studies -the IFG-2 and
I Selection of one hydraulic model over the other depends on three
considerations .. These include (1) the level of resolution of the aquatic
habitat microhabitat desired {2) the level of effort available for commitment
eld data collection and (3) site-specific considerations.. The IFG-2
is a water surface profile program (step backwater model) which is based
on uniform flo1t1 theory.. It is most applicable to stream reaches with rela-
tively mild 9radient and uniform cross section (£" '~Jally varied flow con-
di ons).. The I FG-4 mode 1 is an empi ri :a 1 model based on reg"ime theory and
regression analysis.. It provides greater latitude for application to stream
reaches th non-uniform gradient and irregular cross section (rapidly varied
flow condi ons).. One or two sets of fie 1 d data are recommended for ca 1 i-
bration of the IFG-2 model, whereas a minimum of three data sets are recom-
~~~~ncln to calibrate the IFG-4 modelo
tions exist in a rigid stream channelo Streamflow is defined as
if depth flow and velocity at a specific location remains
roughout the time interval under consideratione This definition is
commonly accepted to mean that discharge remains constant through the
si ng the time interval required to collect a set of calibration
stream nnel is u gi if it {1) does not change during
III
me peri required to call all sets of calibration data~ and (2) does not
change while conveying natural streamflows of the magnitude to be
simulated (Trihey 1980).
Prior to initiating the 1984 MRM studies, approximately 130 si channel or
mainstem locations were selected candidate study sites by EWT&A based on
nation of a 1 photography .. channels and si s 1 oughs at which
tat models had oped by ADF&G Su Hydro prior to 1984 were
site ect ion process . ch candi study s i
cl s i fi into one habi categori according the hab i
as the mainstem discharge decreased from ,000
to 9,000 (Table III-1)., T~is approach study site selection was
chosen e transition is expected to occur in existing mainstem
and side habi as a result proj induced changes in the natural
ow mi e ver. A total of ght study si were sel
r il lie analysis in 1984 ( e III I!I-1) ..
e III hydraulic models ied ct 1984 middle ver modeli
rea ng inook.. ites are i ifi by river mile
ion ver bank looki upstream ( eft;
Si of
7 cross I
5 cross I
9 cross on I
5 cross on I
7 cross section IFG-4
9 cross section I
cross on I
6 s IFG-2
I I I
Tab 1 e I I I -1 .. Description of Habitat Transformation Categories
0
I
II
III
IV
v
VI
VI I
VIII
IX
X
i were
Source serude
Descri on
Tributary moutn itats that rsist as tributary mouth
habi at a lower ow.
slough and si outh habi that persi as the
itat type at a lower flew.
de channel tats transform side slough
habitats at a lower flow and possess upwelling which
a rs to ~ersi throughout nter.
habi that transform to side slough
a lower
that persis
ow but do not appear to sess
throughout ntere
Side channel habitats persist as side channel
habitats a lower flow~
or side channel areas transform
nnels a lower flow.
Indistinct mainstem or side habitats that persist
as indi i areas a lower
Indisti mainstem or si
side slough itats
ling whi rs to
channel areas that transform
a lower flow and possess
rsist throughout winterQ
or side cha
ough habi
s upwe11i
water course that is
isolated ls without
habi
a 1 o~Jer
which persi
or consists
a lower ow ..
ns habi that persi as mair~tem bitat at a
lower ow$
on a ow ~000
a 1 .. 1
III~4
STATION
101
( Approx. Scale}
ffi RIVER MILE
oure III Middle river DIHAB modeling si
III-5
112.6l
Fi III 1 ver
Creek
0
DIHAB mode11
( Approx. Scoie)
RIVER MILE
III-6
R MiLE
Fi re III Mi le river I i sites ..
II
j
0
e
( ctpprcu: .. sc-aJ
ILE
I I ~; 1 e ver DI i si
III
F I I -1 le ver DI i
mile
cpprox scala)
RIVER MILE::
si
III
0
m e
( appro:r., seo l e )
RIVER MILE
1 I Mi e ver DI model i
I I I 0
itat categories that were well represented by existing models were not
studied further during the 1984 field season.
METHODS
Site Installation and Data Collection: A varying number of cross sections and
staff wer"e installed at each study site to describe pools, riffles, and
runso Cross sections were also positioned at the transitions between riffles
and pools~
Methods for installing staff gages are described in Part II of this report and
the FV84 ADF&GI Su Hydro Aquatic Studies Procedures Manu a 1 o Cross section
les were determined for each cross section with a level and survey rod.
Horizontal distances between headpins were measured to the nearest leO ft by
s a survey or measuring tapes" Streambed elevations were measured to the
nearest 0 .. 1 ft usi rential leveling techniques.. In conjunction with
cross
1 and ri
on survey, the
\\fa ters edge,
surface e 1 evati on was determined at the
depth of flow was measured at a minimum of
three points on each cross section.
Subs composition and the associated cover value were visually estimated
ac:ross each transecto Substrate composition was classified using
teri a presented in 1 e I I I -3 (Estes and Vincent-Lang 1984). Cover
was descri usi a igit code following Schmidt et al. (1984), in which
digit refers to the cover type and the second digit identifies the
cover (Table III-4)o The presence of upwelling groundwater was
isual at cross section ng October 1984 and April 1985c
III-11
e iii-3.. Subs
Silt
Sand
Small Gravel
Gravel
e
Cobble
der
Table III •
silt!V sand
lder
an
k
code classi cationo
Vi ly mated
Parti e
ze
1/8-1"
3-5 11
ou
)
Code assi ca+ionQ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ion 8
9
Clas fication
PERCENT
COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
CODE
c 1
.,2
.. 3
e4
e5
I I I 12
The IFG-4 hydraulic model requires that the water surface elevation
tified for each cross section at which no flow occurs.. This elE~vation is
ca 11 ed the stage of zero flow and generally corresponds to the streambed
elevation in riffles and runs and the downstream ic s.
The stage of zero flow is not required when applyi the IFG-2 model.
Thus at a 11 I FG-4 sites, the stage of zero ow at each eros s SE~ct "ion wi n
site was determined from the surveyed streambed profile., Stream~ed
elevations of hydraulic controls downstream the study sites vl~:~re esti
for use in the model calibration procedures.
Depth and velocity information necessa for calibration were collected
at each site using a Marsh-McBirney or ce velocity mete1r and a top-
wading rod.. depth was measured to the nearest 0 .. 05 foot and
ocities were measured to 0.,1 feet second.. These measurements \vere
classi ed as E!ither· 11 Ca1ibration 1
' or "shorelinen data. Calibrat·ion data were
1 ected use th the I mode 1 sma 11 er study sites and were
ined at ve~rticals across an entire cross section. Shoreline data were
lected at larger study sites and were obtained at verticals on that
portion of the cross section extending from each bank out i the channel
1 either the depth or velocity was limiting to field personne·l .. Shoreline
were used in IFG-2 model to provi high resolution along the channel
rna ns rf? sh habi ght exist.. Depths velocities usi:~d in the mid
ls model were estimated cross section and water surface
les apportion.11ent of discharge using the continui equation ..
III-
General Techniques for Hydraulic Model Calibration: Calibration of the IFG-4
was undertaken following recommended IFG guidelines (Main 1978 and
1hous et al .. 1984) as supplemented by Trihey and Hilliard (1984).. Guide-
lines suggested by Trihey and Hilliard include:
1 .. ing depths and velocities for streamflows re!presenting the
anticipated extrapolation limits of the calibrated model during the
initial calibration runs.
2, sual examination of water surface profile plots for each cal i-
ion discharge as well as the streamf1ows representing the upper
lower extrapolation limits of the modele
If the observed and predicted water surface profiles do not agree,
~
or forecast water surface profiles for the upper and lower
extrapolation flows appear unreasonable {i.e~ water flowing uphill
or conflicting th the sl of the calibration profile) the
foll procedures were completed through an iterative processG
a$ Examine the stage of zero flow to see that it has been
correctly defined.
b. Check that cross section coordinates have been correctly
calculated ferred to the IFG-4 input deck~
c. Check that the right and 1 eft bank water surface e 1 evati ons
been properly used to provide a horizontal water su ce
III-
3 ..
L
across the cross section. If a large discrepancy exists
between right and left bank water surface elevations, adjust
the streambed elevations to cause a horizontal water surface
elevation to exist.
d. Adjust the calculated water surface elevations at each cross
section within the following limits to provide more realistic
forecasts of water surface profiles for the extrapolation
flows:
flat gradient ± 0.02 ft
steep gradient ± 0.05 ft
e. If steps a through d do not result in reliable water surface
profiles for the extrapolation flows, it is quite possible the
stage discharge ationship is _non-linear, and more reliable
hydraulic simulations will result from high and low flow models
used in combination rather one model to simulate the
entire flow range of interest.. Therefore, separate the fie 1 d j'
data into two subsets and develop two hydraulic models follow-
ing the guidelines and procedures described above.
reasonable water surface profiles are forecast by model,
review the velocity adjustment factors (VAF's) in accordance with
IFG guideli
III-15
While reviewing the VAF•s, measured velocities were adjusted ±0 .. 10
ft/sec in low velocity areas or ±10 percent if in excess 2
ft/sec and extremely small non-zero velocities { .. 01 to .. 05 ft/sec)
or abnormally la Manning's "n" values { .. 1 to .9) were assigned to
shoreline areas zero velocity was reported in order
to improve the ictive ca 1 ity of IFG-4 model over the
of extrapolation flows.
Calibration I models also fall recommended IFG guide,lines and was
and
si
by procedures developed by EWT&A utilize the shoreline depth
oci coll over a wi uf flows and the 1 ned
ng curves for several cross sections in study si
rna approach in cali ng IFG-2 s was adjustment of Manning's 11 n11
ues for
oci es
i input
cell along the cross
water surface profiles ag
ta an I i rsc 1
cross ion (Cross t-• sec~"' 1on
on until predicted shoreline
the eld data~
the su elevations
1) each streamflow to be
evations were ine.d from the ge-discha
onship de vel this cross on ( r\t~fer to ion II).
curves at the cross sections in the study si
wa elevations th ich to compare forecast
If a low wa su evation at a
' the nni ues were i Decreasing
nni n values ... ~.. .... on .. l.IIC
III-
the desi water surface profile was attained for the calibration
f1 ,s), the di bution of ocities across each cross section was compared
with available field obse ons. Plots of observed versus predicted
veloci es were used to identify cells where an adjustment in Manning 11 n11
ue for i vidual cells was required. If individual 11 n11 va,lues were
si ificantly al in this process, the water elevation iated
from target surface elevation.
ing 11 values lly decrease th an increase in discha result
streambed roughness a reduced on retarding fl Olii as depth of
ow increases. IFG-2 model accepts n-modifiers account for this
princi e ( lhous • 1984). maintain characteristic shape of
velocity bution pattern across the cross on (i.e., the general
of gh mid channel and lo~ shoreline velocity areas), all 11 n" values at
cross on were mul plied by a factor; greater· than 1. 0 to
raise el ion, and less 1 .. 0 to lower it.. cal
n-modi er values ra from 1.. for low fl to 0.60 for extremely gh
OWSe S between fiers for high and low ows exi
se most calibration were 1
unn ues do not
lie conditions as they do
ire much
reproduce
A single I
i ow
model was always
lie condi ons.. This was
a f1 ow that a 1
duri low ow condi ons and
ustment s i mu 1 ate 1 ow ows
flow observations ..
to reli y predi low and
marily due interaction between
s scha ationship such
s ove gravel bars, or tr·ansformation of a ri
III-
l
a run.. The need two models was evidenced by unrealistic velocity
di stri ons, especi ly along the shorelines, between hi and low ow
Gener~l Techniques for Hydraulic Model Verification: The quali of each
calibrated IFG-4 or I hydraulic was uated at twu 1 s ..
one is a litative assessment models overall performance with
on criteria .. model was given a numeric rctting ng
upon its of compliance with criteriae Numeric
assigned through a compa
professi 1 judgment~
of model performance cri
i on professional
ngs were
a, or through
requires: an
ng of channel hydraulics, 1 iari ty the study si
ence model, knowledge the model 11 be in the
itat analysis.,
Numeric ngs assigned mode 1 rmance of the criteria may
r 0, 1 or 2 as
ng the c r:ti
avera 11 1 i of the
Excell
Good
le
e
defi
ibrated
8
7
below .. avera 11 score!J
the c teria, was to
s according the foll
mum possi e score)
<5; or zero for any uation
calcul
i cate
scale:
• I t-~ / .;_,. ... '
III
~
#
LEVEL ONE EVALUATION FOR IFG MODELS
Criteria 1: How well does the model conform to the IFG and EWT&A callibration
guidelines?:
Rati
a.. Plot 1water surface profi 1 es, s. age of zero flow, and streambed
profile.. Are they reasonable? To be reasonable, wate1r must flow
downhill; an increase in discharge should cause the pool/ ffle
sequence to drown out and the water surface profi 1 e to become more
uniform in gradient; a decrease in scharge should cause the water
surface profile to more distinctly l'"eflect changes ir stream bed
gradient and riffle/pool profiles.
b.. Examine water surface elevations forecast by the cal ibr·ated model ..
Are the predicted water surface elevations over a broad range of
discharges coincident with the stage-discharge curves for each site?
Cc Compare predicted depths and velocities at the calibration flows to
eld data. Do the predicted disc rges agree with the discharges
measur·ed in the fi d for each cross section (IFG-4 model only)?
the cted velocities realistic? Are there mor·e than few
outliers for the extrapolated flows?
2 = A mode~1
i es
can forecast both water surface ele~ations and veloc-
y.
III-
Cri
1 = A model that can define water sur·face elevations and velocities
accu,rately at the calibration ows but may not be able to reliably
define both WSEL and velocities near the limits of the extrapolation
rang1e~
0 = A model t cannot accurately reproduce depths or velocities at the
calibration ow.
a 2: well does the extrapolation range the calibrated model
to the desired range?
Subreaches of the overall extrapolation range of the calibralted model are
rated exc:e 11 ent, good, acceptab 1 e or no1: acceptable depending upon the
degree to which predicted water surface elevations coincide with the
stage-discharge curve and VAF's coincide with IFG idelinese
rst assumption made in this eva 1 uation is that accurate stage-
scha curves are available for seve·-~ cross sections in the study
si The ability to evaluate the forecasting capabili es of the model
field
in 1
signi
an increasi number of 1-d.efined stage scharge curves
study site.. By reviewing aerial photography and incorporating
ence it can determined whether there is sufficient change
or flow patterns (such as other channels
at higher mainstem scharges) that may cause a
in the slope o: the stage-discharge relationship above
avail le data~
III
ngs:
2 = A model that can forecast water surface evations coincident with
scharge curve while retai ng VAF•s between 0 .. 9 and 1 .. 1
entire extrapolation range ..
1 = A can forecast ei •s or water surface elevations
thin the extrapolation range.
0 = A model that cannot forecast acceptable •s or VAF's within the
defined rapolation range.
a 3: 1C s y cal ib the species
life stage ing considered?
si estab 1 i shed to eva 1 a cular species or life stage
accurately represent crohabitat condi ons important to another
species or 1 i stage. For example a good rearing site may not be an
acceptab 1 e~ i site to substrate composition or· absence of
1 i Carefully review the mi itat characteristics of the
si in reference to life history i rements of species or
1 i t i s ing ua Cross sections are properly located to
ace~: ne is of importance to
s ies r 1 i stage interest that a sufficient number of
ve icals are incl at cross section to pro vi an accurate
ion oc dis tion.
III-21
2 = A model ides cient sian in i hydraulic
ts to be lt juvenile 1i with an
1 gh l
1 = A model can provi a hi 1 of precision for eval ng
1 ife for whi study s i was pri ly estab 1 i
hydrau 1 i c forecasts are on cons i "acceptab "J for r
life Had cross ons verti ca il s n the
study been laid out di , additi
a raulic cali ' a would have
sible ..
0 = In data were coll calibrate hydrau 1 i c l in
es/li
a 4: 1 range s veloci es compare
oci sui ility c
1 may ly s or velocities
lie vi int, erroneous and
es occur in a values """ sui i 1 i ty I
ices are sensitive!j particular set
i sui i 1 i ty c a ing ; nera 1 ~ lie
III
models juveniles should accurately define low velocity areas ( 0.8
t not as accurate when velocities exceed 2 ft/sec ..
ow greater 0 .. 15 need only be approxima and are
11 e consequence in steep-sided channels where an error in the
su evation will not cause a notable change in top width.
lie models for spawners should accurately define velocities up 2
ft/sec, and depths up 1.0 ft.
ngs:
2 = The hydraulic model ides accu recasts of depths a
throughout the 11 ranges
ility criteria are ned ..
ocities present in the study si
and oci es for whi sui
1 = lie forecas are suffi y accu to descri the order
tude suitability index the 11 result in a
i model even though the precision of hydraulic
are questionable.
0 = hydraulic model is incapable of accurately identifyi the
itude the tat suitability i
L
eva ion c te a were
were assi an ex 1
anal cal iques can al
ON FOR I MODELS
i
rating
calib
1
IFG-2 or I
one eva 1 on,.
inco as additional steps in
III
recommended model calibration procedures for other studies usi the IFG
lie models.
The t method of eva 1 ua t i ng the ictive ilities hydraulic
models would to call additional sets near the limits the extrap-
on a.re not in the calibration compared
wi model ons .. is method can dam be ied, however. The
anal cal procedure which follows has been suggested by lmc,tt (1981)
use ic models which similar prob1 when eval ng di
ences icted
I
A visual between pl the and pre-
oci es at all cross sections calib on flow ..
A tative as can made ng seve ich
slope (b)
a predi
di between observed a
Correl on Coeffici (r},
predicted
ent of
intercept (a) of a least squares ression
ues .. 's
nation ( ),
observed
va 1 ues have usually been as reliable measures a
• s predi ve ili es. Willmott (1981) has suggested ng
addi onal
model ..
mean
cs better eva 1 uate
variables i ic a
re error
N = [N-1 I ((a ) -0.) 0~5
1 i=l
=
N
1 I (P. - (
i= 1
i ctive ca i 1 ity of
tematic
I I
as well as the total root mean square error
RMSE
where:
i = 1,2, •••• ~····0" {sample size of the number of predicted
cells)
0 = Observed or field measured data
P = Model predicted datav
is all, or largely composed RMSEun states Willmott, 11 perhaps the
model is as good as it can without major reworking .. n index of agreement
(d) may a 1 so be ca 1 cul a ted to determine the degree to wh·i ch a mode 1 's
predictions are error free. The index of agreement is computed by
d = 1 ....
value of d varies
2 (Po .,. 0.)
1 1
r P. -o . 1
2 + o. om 0 ]
1
a computed va 1 ue of 1 .. 0
indicates perfect agreement between the observed and predicted observations,
a 0 .. 0 compl disagreement ..
IFG-2 Mode1:
A visual rison can be of the observed and predicted velocity dis-
ion pl for I models, most of the observed data was
obtai near shoreline., In , ra,, cells in the IFG-2 model
::oincide icals where field measuremen were made, but rather \>Ji
distinct nges i channel ' s' or habitat suitability .. A
III 5
ve ve 1 oci ty bution n was
section, usi calib ion flow data, which typi
loped for
extended
cross
1 wi
only ine data available~ horizontal velocity but ion
was 1 ei measured ues obtained a similarly cross
the a compl data set was avail es or by si
a m·1 veloci stri on based on channel
(i.e .. , hi ocities ld to deepest po ion the
is is a reli le method, si cross-secti area discha
are fi ave oci is defi
the I model at di rges the ibration flow
ve1oci but ions si lar in cali on flow ..
inconsi eld i velocities occurred at
hi
corre_
(
c
a
ows, a
veloci
ow
i
ons
a 1.. 1
i
e III
ow
ion
i
was
s
va
juvenile
) s descri
r juvenile
oped .. 1 ' the hi ow
are steeper near the IS edge
The calib hydraulic
forecast for juvenile
suitabili teri a ( rves)
e sued in were
i
a 1 ~ 1985 ..
are summa zed in
si slough areas
sui ili
res I I I 4
II
_J
.4 ..
:::) .3
U>
.2
. I
0 -lr-
0
Figur .. e III-2.
JUVENILE CHINOOI<
SUITABILITY CRI ERI CURVE
DEPTH
2.0
DEP (FT)
SUITABILITY CRITERIA
u 00
0.14
0.15
JQeQQ
y
10.0
Juvenile chinook salmon suitability criteria for depth applicable
c 1 ear i d \'I ate r h a b i s . : hm i d t a 1 .. 1 9 8 4 .
1.0 Ve locH Clear Turbid
0.0 0.42 0.42
0.05 LO LO
\
0.20 LO LO
0.35 1.0 1.0
\ 0.50 '~0 0.80
091 0.65 LO 0.60
0.60 0.68 0.38
LiO 0,44 0.25
1.40 0 0.15
1.70 0.18
\ 2.00 12 0.02
0 0.01
\ 0 0.0
\ Cleor water less 5 NTU \ Turbid wafer· 60 to 200NTL
\
\ L \
0.4. \ --Clear
0.0-~·--------=-~------~--------~-----------~~~~w.~~------~
0 LO
Figure III
L5
inook salmon suitability teria
habitats. wee 1985.
clear turbid
al. 1984, Elvt&A
3.0
ocity
Source:
X w
0 z
1.0
0.8
LEGE
11\1\\ -C I
-Tu
Percent Cover
0.1 0-5
0.2 6-25
0 3 26-50
jll
0.6. 0.4 51 -75
0.5 76-100 ',1
0.4
0.2.
11
1
! I ll jf 1 j
'II
II
II!IIIIIIIIIIIU
I·
0.1 --0.5 0.1--0.5 0.1 __ .,.. 0.!:1 0.1 __ ,.. 0!) 0.1--0.5 01 --0.5 0.1 --0.5 0.1 --0.5 0.1 ---0.5
1 2
No Cover Emergr:n!
VCQfliOlion
Figure III .
3
/\quO II C
Vogolalion
4
Dchr 1S onc1
DuuJioll
5
Ovorhonging
niporson
6
UntjiJfCUI
Bonks
PEnCENT COVER by CGVER TYPE
7
Largo
GroVQI
8 9
Cobb!" or
flould ors
ovor 5"
Cover suitability criteria recommended for use in modeling juvenile
chinook habitat under clear and turbid conditions. Sources:
hmidt . 1984. EWT&A and wee 1985.
Table II 5.. Cover sui
clear a
rcent
Cover r
0~
OoOl
OnOl
0 01
100% 0901
Or.31
0 31
0 .. 31
51-75% 0 .. 31
-100% 0.31
1 1 ication
ic
0., 0 ..
0~ 0 .. 22
0 0()39
0 o" 0 12 0~
0 .. 1 0.,31
0 .. 31 0 .. 39
0 .. 31 0.46
0.,31 Oe52
0.31 0 ..
. 0-5% -4 .. 38%; 6 .
for use in modeli juvenile chinook habitat
rces: dt et a1, EWT&A a wee 1985.
Debris & rcut Rubble Cobble or
Deadfa 11 nks 3n Boulders (5u
Clear Water ( }
0811 0 06 0& 0~07 0 .. 09 0,09
0.,33 0. De 0 .. 21 0.27 0.29
0.,56 0.34 o. 0. 0,45 0 .. 49
0 .. 78 0.47 0. '75 0 .. 0 .. 0.69
1 .. 00 0 .. 61 0 .. 97 0. 0~81 0.89
rbid Water {EWT&A)
o. 0. 0 .. 44 0.31 0 .. 39 0 .. 39
Oo58 0 .. 0 0 .. 0.,47 0 .. 51
0.67 0 .. 41 0 .. 0 .. 0.54 0 .. 59
0.77 0.46 0 .. 74 Oo48 0 .. 0 .. 68
0. 0.52 0 .. 82 0 .. 54 0.69 0.76
-1.75; 26 -1.20; 51 -0.98; 100% -0 ..
Of pa icular interest are the separate suitability criteria for ve!locity and
cover ich apply under clear and turbid water conditions& C'lear water
hahitats ·occur in side channel areas conveying base flows det"ived from
groundwater or-tributary inflow when the side channel is not breached by the
turbid waters of the mainstem.. The mainstem discharge at which the transition
from clear to turbid water occurs depends on the streambed elevation at the
head of the side channel relative to the water surface elevation of the
mainstem.. Water surface elevation versus mainstem discharge and site flow
versus mainstem discharge relationships described in Section II of this report
were used to determine at which si flows the clear or turbid wrater velocity
and cover criteria were to be ied.
thin the HABTAT model the study site is comprised of a matrix of cells, each
possessing flow-dependent hydraulic va ables obtained from the calibrated
models. Since the top of the study site responds to incremental changes
in streamflow, the total number of wetted cells a their cumulative surface
HABTAT program evaluates the utility of each cell at a specified flow by
calculating a joint preference factor, ich in this study was defined as the
p of the i vidual suitability values associated with the prevailing
a cover conditions~ Weighted usable area is calculated for
ea ce 11 its surface area by the joint preference factor$ The
r s is sum of the i ividual cell WUAs .. \~hen o 1 otted I
as a s rge, study s i i icates the site speci ed
res fish itat to cha in ow .. WUA is exp~""essed in units of
re r linear feet s
III 1
1 wetted area WUA curves juvenile wevoe i
1 i c modeli si ng a ran£'€
di 5 35,000 S~rface area va1ues
ows i on i
s were mated siona1 j
I is was are in e B-6 ..
A me es pl available e habitat was so
by in i a i site lOWS
season WUA versus s flow
on .. The ng fi on of ons on a
si i is over the summer
Si 2R
on: is te is 1 2~2 miles uence
ver on the i River ( III-·1) ..
is 350 i the lower lf si to
r half Cross ons ~ 3, 4 9 descri l'
s 11ow, vel le ere::"") ~-ons 7 a
slow re I I-5) ~ ,.. 6 areas ..
c s ons 5 a d ex
ross rna 1 as itions at a ions
were s Cross ions across a small
I
Plate III-si e 1 2n
• I\ on 1 ' 1 main stem discharge· 23,
l7::S
~'tQ
[
:;: g
t .l!O:lo
'=!
!
~$Q
.:!.~!!.
)7$
~-:tO'
-
§
~ llh!!>
;:;;,
w
~
3~
3~!1
0 :oo
;;;.-n~£ '!'"lloO .. '-!:!"' &.iLk><
III-5.
i
-~
~ 3t ~::
~ ~ ,!!~·~
iJ
~
:!'~-a
F II Cross
II 5
mai
is
1
ze
the 1
a 1
9
is ma y
r of silt in the 1
rubble e
the 1
ow 9,200
area near cross section one is
site was
ons
no
sal
s
on:
s s
cfso
and 7
ected
1 ing was
si red
ow
i le in
I is
measu
le
channel.,
1
is avail
with some
across
site is
ma
cfs
s t
ons
s no
1 c
across
s
, si
ow
was
v1ere
si
cross
s
section at ev1~ calibration flow.. Because cross sections 2 a 5 do
extend across the main channel, they were not included in the hyd ic model ..
ri
i
e III-6.. Hydraulic data available to calibrate the IFG-4 model for site
101 ..
lie model was established to describe the depths and velocities in
rna in channe 1 .. discharges greater cfs, o~t entered the
The surface el ons in the main and ri channels
across cross sections 1 5 ~ The streambed e l1eva ons were
in mai in a water surface on
across a cross section { re III backwater arPa at the mouth
1 also su el ions than the main
eleva ons in l channel were alsc raised to
n su el ons cross sections 3 d 4.,
\S'Ja surface 1es the ca 1 ibrated model are
in are also p"~otted .. I
s ca 1 i th sons between the
ow CUlr"'Ves a i su evations ..
son scha cross sec:ion is illustr,~' in Fi re I I I
si 1 r sons re rna at each cross ~ection.
1 I-
3:10 370
g ~
:z § Q
~ 365 ~ 355 ~ i3 ...;; ....
Yo! l.l.i
::l ::;:) ;.:: t:: p.
350 J60
::l70
~ a %:
0 I= ;:::
~ :'353 < > 4.; w i:i ..., ;...) :::; ~ c::
1-
!160
s ~
z
0 0 ~ J55 ~ ~ ~ -' w
w w ;::) ~ ;;::
I-
J~O
2C:O 300 400
1I b. cross s ions
I I
--
III-7. ·i son
101.
4
ST E
and predi ed
si
er
7 a 9
i 1 from 1 i hydraulic
1
Figu between wa su
lie 1 and
ross section 8
t by
ionsh·ip
ip
cross
es the
a oc t
mai
ow
rna n
available
onshi '
6000
1
rea
ica1 ana
l .
(Figure
lie
is was
"1)
st·ica 1
i e B-5 ..
ent was assi
'
di
I
versus stage re1a
s
s
rati
i i es also break
c site
22000
tern Dis cfs
s s
c same ve
veni e va s ma ns
as
t
is
were also
9, 17
i s
' th:e si
was
is no rel
Una .. _
are i i
ow
is a
i
s
e
ble
ca sea 1 e !I resenti
son curves
rges ..
A
220000 -.----------------------------
WETTED SURFACE AREA
0 8000 1.5000 28000
28000 35000
s
s a
Rearing habitat for juvenile chinook in the side channel is at
mains discharges in the vicinity of 11,000 cfs. The sharp 1ri se in
occurs near 9,000 cfs is caused by the site being breached and
associated incr1~ase in turbidity which provides tiona 1 cover va 1 ue
The curve is also plotted in Figure III at an expanded ve ical scale
response habitat to incremental changes in sc
presence of id r and the di but~~n of water veloci
rna of the response curve this site~ Although
site exists as ffle-run habitat, the g ent is low
velocities do become limiting to juvenile chinook until mainstem
di exceed 16,000 cfs~ The large vegetated gravel bar which separates
side channel from the mainstem and another large gravel bar in lower
ion the s site ich "is exposed at 1 Qtil ows does not
a iable increase in rea at ows due low
cove value r sand and g s Nevertheless, in rel on
0\\1 e,i is site possesses i y good habitat for j 1e
in ., ow ( TTT ) . i ovJer ' re "J.l
recas re i usi 1 i I
ious s site Because
a ion is lar I area
es r mains s less t 9$ greater
n
1 I
su
as
1
on is
is
-:e area the channe 1 \ve re
usi digitized measurements
in inger--Ki
t sui ili
( i
('1.985) ~
d:
teria wer·e used
t s
non-brer
rate
numerous fi
mains
ter
j i
ne
s
1
i lless sui le
h i j e i as mai O\~S recede~
mai di rges exceedi ion 1 t
were also ce areas associa
area
\vere t
ana ex su area curve to a xi mum
1 at
rve uveni e v~as as ~0 ti 1
is ev a e ver r ..
ic are av t on s
s JS s
recas ca es·;
..j. s in f: L
es
s
3,
1
e
s
si
low
1
lower
ics
s
5
s si
f of
cross
on
1
an I
ow are
is 1 2 .. 2
i
1 and
area i
e
its
rea
n
si flows
les
l
re
less
large side
I
i
IIi b
i
uence
II )1 ..
ter are,a
are~a;
areas ..
the
s
was se 1
the
i
is
(5
a
cross
avai e
consiJe
remain
d
to l
I
30000
27000
24000
21000
16000
15000
!2000
9000
6000
3000
0
6000
5400
4800
420()
3600
3000 w
t-2400
~
U) HlOO
1200
600
0
MAY
·---v--···
r \
MAY
Figure III-10.
JUN JUL AUG SEP
·v v
JUN JUL AUG
MONTH
Time series plots of juvenile chinook salmon WUA as a function of discharge
®May 20 to September 15, 1984 for 101.2R modeling site.
'\
1 U := 500 I
Plate III-2. Modeling site 101.5L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem discharge: 23,000 c
-'':'5
3?0
£
~
~ JS:I
.::
:360
.3SS
Figure III-11 .. Cross sections for 101., study site depicting \"later
surface elevations at calibration discharges of
1696 and 4500 cfs.
III-48
s c mainstem ow a 1 cfs~
A becomes ve less
Site flows
6 a to mai di 23
lmon obse in the le chi
i 1
area access the
1 ows pas site 1 schargeso
avail e incl 1 surveys
cross ons 1' 2' 5; curves by cross ons
, 1984); lie data summa zed in
Cross ons 3 4 were from
mea
III ic avail e ca 1 ibrate site
ibration
Cross Section(s) Type*
2 6210 4 D
;.) D
I :9 2 s
2213 3 D
11, 1' 2' 5 s
III
e III (
1
s =
inued) ..
3530
(incl
(does
instantaneous di
,300**
,500
3
1, 2, 5
D
s
channel and shoreline measurements)
ude mid channel measu )
models were required accurately describe site for mainstem
of 5 ,000 Veloci les for si flows 1,696
cross sections 1, 2, and 5 were similar.. However,
s 1 ocity bution across the cha at a site ow of 4,500
i il different Manni •s "nn values. Velocities increased
from water's low flows, but rose ickly
mum channel ty r11uch oser to shore high flows.
les two measu ows cross section 3 were very
si lar low medium ows through site. Only low flow
were e cross ion 4 ..
I ca 1 ib the s with to , predicted surface
ons ons 2
ons ca 1 cul a from
'5 were compared to the corresponding
ing curves.. Water surface elevations for
cross ons 3 were by compa predi widths th
from scharge measurements .. r su
les on IFG-2 for ibration ows of 1,696, 2,250, and
r ows correspondi discha of 5 a 35,000
re s re III-12 .. surface ions and rating
curve wa su ions are also shown.
366
--364 Q)
I'D --
z
0
1-~ 362 w
_J w
w ::>
0::
1-
360
358
356
Figure III-12.
--,..,----
e Observed Water Surface Elevarfon
Raring Curve Water Surface Elevation
Predicted Wotar Surface Profile (Calibration Flow)
Predicted Water Surface Profile (Model Limit Flows)
9.·:~·~ Streambed
5S ·.c.CTION
19tl6 24t47 31+08
STREAMBED STATION (feet)
Comparison of observed and predicted water surface profiles from calibrated
model at 101.5L study site.
Verification: Figures B-2.2 and 8-2 .. 3 show velocity profiles produced by
two IFG-2 models at cross section 5 for calibration flows of 1,696 and 4,500
cfs~ The observed shoreline velocities for those flows are also plotted. The
figures dem0nstrate that the set of n nu va 1 ues that produces the proper
velocity profile at the low flow does not accurately produce that of the high
flow, and vice versa.
~icatior!_: The low flow IFG-2 model represents site conditions for mainstem
discharges up to 10,600 cfs while the high flow model is applicable to
mainstem discharges greater than 10,600 cfse This breakpoint corresponds to a
site flow of 2,500 cfs. By utilizing all available site information,
i nc1 udi ng aeri a 1 photography, channe 1 geometry and field experience, the
1 i mi ts for which the mode 1 s can be considered exce 11 ent exte!nd beyond the
range of available data. The models were extrapolated beyond the data range
to 5,000 cfs on the lower end of the low flow model and 23,000 cfs for the
upper end of the high flow model. At 23,000 cfs, the chclnnel geometry
suggests that the tot a 1 flow 1 oss through the overflow channe 1 is 1 ess than
ten percent. Because this outflow is minor9 the upper model limit was extrap-
olated from 23,000 to 35,000 cfs, However the overall rating for the high
flow model for the mainstem range of 23,000 to 35,000 cfs was considered good,
rather than e:Kcellent. The total wetted surface area and juvenile chinook WUA
curves for the study site are presented in Figure III-13. In this figure the
WUA and surface area curves are plotted to the same scale and expressed in
identical units; i.e., square feet per 1,000 feet of stream. A comparison of
the two curves gives an indication of the proportion of the study site which
contains rearing habitato
III-52
on are summa below in bar
.1 f i J I I I
14000 22000
Mainstem
is ngui a narro\rv le
for
that areas suitable for recrui 1
le rates in a narrow
al ine wher.:: oci es are "" ti 11 iamts ) . f
The of curve to ons in mai scha is
in gure II on an e.
increase in associ lower mai rges
the i ti
lower flows at refl
(in secondary s) the on
nears ties. flows small increases in
j inook are due the ive a
1 i area at si
si cance of in in res streamflow,
y vi in on to
su a of si
III
405000
• 360000
3!5000
2700I'JO
' • 225000
· tacooo
135000
90QOO
45000
Q ~--~~--~----r----r----~--~--~----~-----,----~
0 ~000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000
B
25000 _,.....----------------------·-----::
4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000 40000
I-13 of
as
1 ing
si
III-
were forecast tJsing low-and gh-flow IFG-2 models li wi
stri
less
ow
to account for flow-dependent variations in shoreline veloci
on.. The side channel conveys turbid water at mainstem discharge
5,000 cfs. Therefore for juvenile chinook was fo1recast using
id habitat suitability criteria. Application of llow and high
models resulted in sep.!rate WUA functions which were joined together
the single habitat response c~rve presented in Figure III-13. This
was ""'""''"" .. '""" i shed by over1 appi the WUA forecasts from the 1 ow and gh flow
models and choosing a discharge value which would effect the smoothest
transition from one habitat response curve to the other, The selected value
was 8, cfs (Table B-6.2).
The time series plot of WUA for juvenile chinook bears a strong resemblance to
the daily streamflow record at the site for the May 20 to September 15, 1984
period (Figure III-14).. Site flows dur.;ng this period typically 11/ary between
4 and 8 cfs, accompanied by changes in habitat potentia 1 1ra ngi ng from
,000 to ft/1~000 ft.. seasonal variability of WUA is small ..
With except-ion of a few high flow periods, site flows and juven·~le chinook
habi at site 101.5L show a remarkable degree of temporal stab;ility during
the rearing season.
Si
Lane Creek on
reach is 4,
is site is located approximately 2 miles downstream of
west bank of the Susitna River ( ate III-3). The study
ft long and varies between 50G and 700 ft wide. Eight cross
III-55
2..'i000
23300
2Ui00
19900
18200
16500
14800
13100
U400
9700
8000
i3000
11'100
10400
9100
7800
6500
5200
3900
2600
1300
0
MAY
MAY
gure III 14.
JUN
JUN
Time series pl
from May 20 to
JUL AUG
JUL AUG
ile chinook salmon WUA as a functi di
15, 1 101.5L modeling 1
-500 1
Pl e III-3. f1 ode 1 i n g s i t e 112 . 6 L on September 6 , 1 983 at a m a i n em discharge: 16,000
ons were initially established duri high mainstem di occurri
oci" ... y areas; in ea y August: cross sections 1, 2, 5, 6 7 be low
3~ 4 8 define h·i gh ve 1 oci areas.. As ows receded during the 1 ,
cross section 4 was re 1 ocated and an cross on, 3A, was added
the low, high ty a rea mi dway
(Figure I I I composi on is cobble rubble
the site
layers of
silt
The
dis
ow
Flaws
10
sand
The 1
channel
ow
rges
10,000
in pool areas and in
substrate des cover,
e.
is breached at mai di
ong ght
,000 cfso Pool and
, and a bar ow
area 1 ocated at
th 1 ess 50 percent con-
greater 5~000
conveys side channel flow
e dominate site
the confluence of Sl is
scha above 10,000 ' the channel becomes a large run ..
7, ' 1,230 377 correspond nstem di of 23
and 7~400
is , ; site was ected represent 1 a side s which
reduce
1 i
i cs
small side s at low dischargeso IFG-2 was
1 size of the Fi d reconnaissance indicated
was l
data
an I
streambank rna ns at hi
d therefore be
discharges, and a
simul channel
II
s
~ a
~
·~4~~~~~~~~~~;;;~
j
200 400
::xs"l"NCI' "'C:., ~f"!' !!..,.,. "'E:.!'OI"lN {I'T:
III-·15. Cross
water surface
of 215~ 355,
4110
4!$0
....
t!
GOO
l;.,;;T.tM;f; P'MlW U:FT O»ll< MU.0Pl!i (F":')
study si d~~pi i ng
ons ca 1 i ion d·ischarges
1430 cfs ..
III
•'1'0 .,.., c=Ro=n,...,.s=ac=T•o'" ' 1 tn•'*' u& • •,
~
"70 1 CJ~osa secr!O•'t o
~ $tenoosa tt!l • Iii
0
Figure III-15~
II CO
l
j
l
_J
liOO eoo
Cross sections for 112~6L study site depicting water
surface elevations at calibration discharges of 215,
3559 721 and 1430 cfs4
III-EO
mon have not been observed spawni in the site. Chinook have been
observed using the channel particularly below confluence ough
Access and pas through site are not problems in this side cha
data available to model site isted of 1 surveys
for all nine cross sections and the hydraulic data summarized in e III-8 ..
e III-Be Hydraulic data available to
112.6Le
Flow Di rge
Date (cfs) ( cfs)
12 6210
355 7500
840913 721
,800
2980 15,300
840822 4820 19,
ibrate the IFG-2 model site
Calibration
Cross Section{s)
7 0
6, 8 D
1,2,3,3A,4,5,7 s
7 D
8 D
1,2,3,3A ,'5,6,7 s
6 D
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 s
* D = scharge measurements (i mid channel and shoreline
measurements) ..
ine measurements ( not incl mid channel measurements).
I requires a hori surface each Cl"'OSS section ..
d rvations of is site indi that is did not occur. Of
several install at each cross section, only data from
III
ch represented the largest on of ow was used to culate
were made cross ion survey to create a hori zonta 1
on some eros s sections.. Observed depths for the
ow 355 cfs (site flow) were plotted th the cross section
Cross sections 2, 3, 3A,4 and 8 d not have horizontal wa
ions were modi ed as fo 11 ows: where plotted water
surface el on was lower than representative water su elevation,
streambed was raised the di in two water surfac~
ons .. , the streambed was lowered re the pl water
evation was higher than representative water surface elevat
2.
ly cross adjusted sig ficantly the left bank (Figure III-16).
curves on mai flow were adopted for seven of
ne cross ons.. Data lected cross section and the new cross
on was i ent to op a good ng curveo t"'efore
cross ions were cali with ties only ..
ng gravel r in the 1 ower reach duri high flow
causes a transformation in the oci ty di on across site, and thus
1 i c mode 1 s were required.
In ca 1 i models respect depth, i cted wa. surface
ons at all cross ions except and 4 were compared the
corres i el or;s ca 1 cul from the ng curves.. Water su
III-62
g
z ~ ~
lol
::7 e:
g
~ ~
"" !
MEASURED ADJUSTED
670 670
C~OSS SECTION 2 CROSS SECTION 3
StatlCn 3 • Dl' SUI!loft 3 • at
.
.
4150 ~
g
j
%
~ ~ ~
lo.l
~ ~ J 450
.
~
444 I I I
a 200 400 500 800 0 200 400 1100 eoo
OISTANCl!: FI!OM LUT-fl»41( ti!AOPII'. ('"!') OISTA.NC!: FROid I.£FT !lANK HEADPIN (FT}
470
CROSS SECTION 5 470
Slalion <40 • Oa CI'IOSS SECTION e
S!&li.M 40 .. 111.1
4SQ t
§ 4110
§ ... ...
:1 e:
4~0 450
44-4
0 lOCI 444
eoo
DISTANCE l'liiOM U:PT BANK HI!;AOPIN (PI') aoo
0!~ TMIC[ F"ROM !.EFT !:!ANI( HEADPIN {i'T)
Figure III-16. Comparison between measured and adjusted cross sections
2 and 8 at 112.6L study site.
III-63
profiles based on IFG-2 output for the calibration flows and the flows
corresponding to 5,000 and 35,000 cfs are sho\\·n in Figure III-17 .. Observed
water surface elevations are also shown for the calibration flows, and rating
curve water surface elevations are shown for the model limit flowsc
Verification: Figures 8-2.4 and B-2.5 show velocity profiles produced by the
two I FG-2 models at cross section 3 for ca 1 i brati on flows of 3!55 and 4,820
cfso The ob3erved velocities for those flows are also plotted. The figures
demonstrate that the set of .. n11 va 1 ues that produces the proper ve 1 oci ty
profile at the low flow does not accurately produce that of the high flow, and
vice versa.
Application: The low flow model describes depths and velocities present in
the channel for mainstem discharges up to 10,000 cfs. The high flow model is
applicable to site flows corresponding to mainstem discharges 1greater than
10~000 cfs. The transition from low to high flow model occurs at a site flow
of 1,070 cfs. limits for the excellent quality rating were expanded from the
limits defined by available data to the mainstem range of 5,000 to 35,000 cfs.
Cross sections 3A and 4 describe a riffle area at low flows which ~ecomes a
run at higher discharges. Because of the limited data available to calibrate
these cross sections at high flows, the high velocities are projected through-
out the entire extrapolation rangeo Because these cross sections represent
only about 10 percent of the total area of the site, and actual velocities at
the high flow are probab 1 y beyond the usab 1 e range on the sui tabi 1 i ty curve-~
the overall model rating was not reduced from excellent&
I I I
--(p
Q)
'C-o
z
0
t! :> w
...J 452 w
w ::>
et:
1-
44
0+00
Figure III-17.
2
t
3+97
3 3A 4 5 6
I t I
8+36 1~8 12+92 15-141 19+86
LEGEND
• Observed Water Surface Elevation
Rating Curve Water Surface E lavation
Predicted Water Surface Profile (Collb. flow)
---Predicted Water Surface Profile (Model LlmitFlows)
d~.:'i:·~~ Streambed
7
-I
30+34
e
I
40 +98
CROSS SECTiON
NUMBER
STREAMBED STATION (feet)
Comparison of observed and predicted water surface profiles from calibrated models
at 112.6L study site.
The application ranges and ratings are summarized below in the t:ar chart
.1 t l I 1
6000
! I
14000
I I ·I I J I l
22000
Mainstem Discharges cfs
1 I l I I
30000
Excellent
In Fi re III-18a total wetted surface area and juvenile chinook WUA are
per 1,000 feet of stream
plotted at an expanded vertical scale~
the same scale .. re III-18b is
At discharges below 8,000 cfs the side channel conveys less than 10 percent of
total mainstem scharge and contains an extensive amount low vel
turbid habitat. Hence the WUA indices juveni 1 e clhi nook are te
1 Williams (1985) demons that the shore 1 i ne area wi n Si
Channel possessing suitable chinook velocities is five times
g 13,500 than at 33,000 cfs. Further, the wetted surface area
sing suitable velocities more than doubles as discharg1e decreases from
13,500 to 8,
WUA response curve plotted in Figure III 8 accents the precipitous
1 i ne in habi al whi accompanies the increase in mai
discha 8,000 The secondary WUA peak~ occurri near ,OuO cfs,
in lower
on
overtopping
the study siteo
a large mid-channel gravel
higher discha~ges, oci es increase
throughout the site, decreasi i value to juvenile chinooko
I I
6000()0 -....,.----------------------------:
540000
• 480000
0 420000
0
~ 360000
..........
~ 300000
li..
• 24001)0
180000
<:(
~ 120000
-<(
WE11'EO SUAF_=A::C::.E ~AREA:;::.:.-----
600100
ol---~--~~==~==~~~==~==~~~~
0 4000 8000 12000 15000 20000 24000 28000 32000 36000 40000
MAINSTEM DISCHARGE (CFS)
8
100000
90000 --aoooo
70000
60000
.......... . 50000 .......
li..
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
0 4000 aooo 12ooo i5ooo 2oooo 24ooo 2aooo 32ooo 36ooo 4oooo
(CFS)
Fi III-18. area and WUA of
i as a
the 112.
ion
i
III-
indices were forecast usi low-~nd gh-flow I s li
Because this side
di 5,000 'J
remains
sui il i
i
were
for l
high
tat
in
low
in
bank
re si
ons were
1
ons~ Sepa
ow HABTAT
gure III
ow
potenti
This si
Susi
(
UUII.dllo.,; curves were
s.. The si e habitat
s tnen
in a smooth
ow
I I
ng the
i ces refl
ow
curve
derahle
on on y 1 .. 5
).
es
The reach ""'""'' .... """!"l!!"l-.
is 1,800 ft 1 Three cross
i ne deep$ low the
cross sections to lower~ area near
sma11 tri
va es
the
(Figure II
mou up
occur near cross
the
e at the
rail
i 5
backwater area is 1
cross section 3. Upwe11i
4 al ght A
cross section 3.
cross ons to
is present a 1 the ght s of
e cover ..
III-68
..... .._.,
I
50000
.«5000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
25000
22500
20000
17500
15000
12500
10000
7500
5000
2500
0
Fi
MAY
III-19.
JUN JUL. AUG
JUN JUL AUG
MONTH
Time es plots uvenile chinook salmon WUA ion di as a
from May 20 to 15, 1984 112 6 ing si
p·fate III-4.
GAGE
-CROSS SECTION
1'' = 250,
~1o de 1 i n g s i t e 11 9 • 2 R on June 1 , 1 98 2 at m a i n stem d i s charge : 2 3 t 000 c f s G
g
s
~
"' ~
s
~ ~ .. :>
E:
g ,,,
~ 3
\"l ! 511:1
...0 IIQ 1:<!0 HIO :100 l40 2$0 320
CHSTANC£ moo.~ .JUT ~!It "'~"' {rrj
Figure III Cross s
surface
£ 51$
~ ~ ... :1 :no !
g ,,,
!
':!: ! !110
::140 :t&o l2o
tm!TN<C£ ntou I.UI BAN>C .. E.>.OPt>< (nl
~
§
~
~ :110
for 119. study site I ~cting
calibration discharge of 316 cfs.
II-71
The side channel is breached by the mainstem at 10,000 cfso Below 103000 cfs,
cross ons 4 5 are dry; the backwater area at the lower end of
si persists even at 5,000 Above 23 ,000 cfs, the 1 eft bank becomes
i ted and site is a large run(> te flows of 1 ,180, 10 and 0 cfs
correspond rna i n stem d i s c ha rg es 23,000, 10,400 and 7,400 cfs
respecti y ..
is sma 11 si channel was ected to represent channels with high oc-
i es and low ocities at moutho An IFG-2 model was select-
ed because the limi data available ..
salmon not been observed in side channel. Small numbers of
juvenile chinook and sockeye salmon were identified in the s·ite~ large
the site .. backwater area the mouth e 1 imi access fficulty i
Passage through the si is possi e below cross section 3 in unbreached
conditions ..
data avail le to the site consistcj of 1 surveys
all cross sections a the hydraulic data summarized in Table III-9e
e III-9.
Oa
Flow
(cfs)
71
316
ic data available to
13,600
17,400
calibrate I model for site
libration
Cross Section(s)
1,2,3,4,5
D
D
1 I
Table III-9 (Continued).
840824 1090 22,700 3 D
* D = Discharge measurements (includes mid nnel and shoreline measurements)
S = Shoreline measurements (does not include mid channel measurements)
streambed evations shifted from August to ,_;tember due the high
flows in the mai Because most of the da was taken before the high
flow , the eros s section e 1 eva ti nos in the 1 i c mode 1 were
adju to agree th the discharge measurements {Figure III=21)o
A velocity prc)file was developed r cross section, ba on the site
fl O'IJ 3 cfso Velocities associated the other flows were
available only cross section 3.. Ve 1 oci es predi by the mode 1 were
j
To
to be reasonable throughout the
(mainstem) based on channel geometry
i cation range 10,000 to 23,000
ibrate the with res to depth, comparisons were made between
and predicted wa surface evations. surface profiles
sed on I output for the three ibrati on flows and for flows
correspondi to discharges of 10,000 and 23,000 cfs are shown in Figure
III-22. Observed r surface ons for the calibration flows
curve wa r surface evations for mode 1 1 i mit flows are a 1 so
adequately rodu· ~s velocities over the ra
of a v a i 1 1 e data ( F i re 8-2 ~ 6 ) ..
III
g
~ ;
"' :I ;:
g:
z
2 ~
d
"" :::> ::
Fi
t4EASURED
!llO~C-RO-S~S~~~----------------------------------~
Stauon
0 ao 120 1eo 200 240 uo 320
DISTANCE I"'FtOM !.El'T SANK MVJ:lPIN (l"T)
~20
!515
::1110
:ns
:110 efs
240 280 320
Ol5TANCE; PROM LEFT e.ANK HI!'.AOPn~ (FT)
III-21. Comparison meas
1, 2, and 3 at 1 9.2R
g
a J::: ~ ~
w
J
Iii: 1-
g
z
! ..,
:l
£:
ADJUSTED
S20
lill&tlon :'1<'11:)
315
!!110
Sl!l
!II()
and adjusted cross
studv site.
Cli
cb
sections
III-74
z
0
ti :::> w
_J w
w
::>
0::: .....
51
1240 cfs
1090 ds
3f6 cfs
510
~-----~7~1~c~t~s----------~~----------~.~
15 cfs
50
0+00
Figure III-22.
2 4
3+80 5+96 9+93
STREAMBED STATION (feet)
LEGEND
OBSERVED WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
RATING CURVE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
PREDICTED WATER SURFACE PROFILE (CALle. FLOW)
PREDICTED WATER SURFACE PROFILE 1 MODEL LIMIT
FLOWS J
STREAMBED
5 CROSS SECTION
NUMBER
14+ 46
Comparison of observed and predicted water surface profiles from calibrated model
at 119.2R study site.
Application: The IFG-2 model was assigned an excellent rating for site flows
of 15 to 1,240 cfs, corresponding to mainstem discharges of 10,000 to 23,000
cfs~ At very high mainstem discharges, the site's flow regime changes dramat-
icallyQ The large volume of water flowing through the site drowns out the
backwater area, and the silty, vegetated left bank becomes inundated .. The
distribution of predicted velocities at the upper cross sections become
unrealistic at flows above 23,000 cfs.. Therefore, an unacceptable rating was
assigned to the mainstem range of 23,000 to 35,000 cfsQ
The application range and ratings are summarized below in the bar chart~
.1 I I l I I l I
6000 14000 22000 30000
Mainstem Discharge. cfs
~ Excellent 0 Unacceptable
The wetted surface area and juvenile chinook WUA curves are presented in
Figure III-23a .. Both curves are plotted to the same scale and expressed ·fn
identical units; i .. e., square feet per 1,000 feet of str·~eam~ ·the greatest
proportion of the \lletted surface area provides rearing hab·itat for juvenile
chinook at mainstem discharges between 10,000 and 12,000 cfs.
The WUA curve plotted in Figure III-23b at an expanded vertical scale accents
the rapid increase in rearing habitat associated with this site breaching near
10,000 cfs.. This marked increase is attributed to turbid mainstem water
ente ng the site and significantly increasing the cover value afforded
juvenile chinook. As mainstem discharge increases beyond 13,000 cfs
III-76
A
250000 -----------------------------"!
225000
. 200000
0 175000
0
0 150000 -~ 125000 ~
ci 100000 ~
tJ) I
-71.5000 -l
50000
25000
oJ---~==~--~--~--~==~==~==~~~~
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000 36000 40000
MAINSTEM DISCHARGE {CFS)
8
50000
45000
.....: 40000
l.J_
35000
30000
.............
~ 25000
lL
• 20000
t5000
iOCOO
5000
0
0 4000 BOOO 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000 36000 40000
MAINSTEM (CFS)
Fi III Proj ions of gross surface a~ea and WUA of
juvenile chinook salmo~ haLitat as a fu ion
of discharqe the 11 modeling site~
III
velocities begin to reduce the rearing potential at this site. Above 24,000
cfs available rearing habitat is restricted to shoreline margins where
sufficient object cover is available to retard velocity.
Because the extrapolation range of the hydraulic model was limited to a range
of mainstem discharges from 10,000 to 22,000 cfs!l it was necessciry to estimate
wetted surface areas and juvenile chinook WUA beyond the extrapolation limits
of the hydraulic model .. The wetted surface area was determined by digitizing
enlarged air photographs obtained at mainstem discharges cf 5,100, 7,400 and
10,600 cfs., The surface area measurements at 5,100 and 7,400 cfs were the
samea The ratio of the digitized surface area at 10,600 cfs to that forecast
by the hydraulic model at the same flow was o47., This rati:o was used to
adjust the digitized surface areas from the 5,100 cfs and 7,400 cfs
photography before using these surface areas to extent the forecast surface
area curve from 10,000 cfs to 5,000 cfs.
Juvenile chinook WUA estimates for unbreached conditions are~ based on the
assumption that rearing habitat potential declines at a constant range as
mainstem discharge declines from the breaching flow of 10,000 to 7,400 cfs~
The percentage of the total wetted surface area providing potential rearing
habitat at 7,400 cfs was assumed to be roughly half, the proportion of clear
water habitat present immediately preceding breaching. WUA values for
mainstem discharges between 7,400 and 10,000 were linearly interpolatede
Since wetted surface area remained constant as mainstem discharge declined
from 7,400 to 5,100 cfs, WUA for juveni 1 e chi nook was assumed to remain
constant ..
I I I ... 78
An exponential decay function was used to extend the WUA curve b1eyond the
upper extrapolation range of the calibrated hydraulic model. The decay
function selected reproduced a habitat response trefid evident to other middle
river side channel sites. The surface area curve was extended from 22,000 cfs
to 35,000 cfs using a positive exponential function .. Both the surface area
and WUA curves should be applied with discretion in the 23,000 to 35,000 cfs
range even though Figure I I I -23 indicates errors associ a ted with the,se curves
would be insignificant. Table 8-6.4 contains further detail r1egarding the
synthesis of surface area and WUA response curves for this site ..
Time series plots of WUA and average daily site flow (Figure III-24) indicate
fairly low habitat potential for juvenile chinook exist at this site during
mid-summer, but comparatively high WUA indices are associated with early
summer and farl site flows. Rearing habitat is maximized at th·is site when
the mainstem discharges range between 10,000 and 14,000 cfs (Figure III-23a}~
associated with typical mid-summer discharges (20,000 to 25,000 cfs). Hence,
the time series ot, Figure III-24, reflects gt~eater fluctuations in juvenile
chinook habitat at this site than is evident for other side clhannel study
sites during the open water season.
This site is 1 ocated di rect1y above the confluence of
of July Creek along west bank of the Susitna River (Plate III-5)~
study reach is 1, ft 1 ong and ranges from 250 ft wide in the 1 ovJer ha 1 f
of the site 400 ft in the upper half.. Three cross sections define the
III
45000
40500
36001)
31500
27000
22500
iBOOO
13500
9000
4500
3000
2700
2400
2i00
1600
l500
1200
900
600
300
0
Fi
MAY
MAY
III-24 ..
JUN
JUN
Time
fr·om May
es
AUG
JUL AUG
MONTH
juvenile chinook 1mon WUA as a function elf d·i
15 198t, 119 i site
Pl III r1ode 1 i si 131 .. 7L on ne 1, 1982 mainstem discharge: 23,000
deep, low velocity area sand two cross secticns describe the shallow faster·
velocity areas.. Two cross sections were established in the transition areas
ow low and high velocity areas (Figure III-25) .. Cobble and rubble ar·e the
principle substrates found in the lower half of the site with gravel and
rubble substrate being predominate in the upper halfc Silt and sand deposits
exist in pool areas and backwater zones.. Cover is provided by the larger
substrate and by two debris zones found ·in the s i
Three channels (A, B and C on Plate III-6) convey mainstem ow into the site
at mainstem discharges of 5,000, 10,000 and 14,500 cfso Site flows greater
than 800, 79 and 15 cfs correspond to mainstem discharges of 23~000, 10,400
and 7,400 cfs ..
is study s!te \r.Jas selected to represent side channels that remain side
s a broad range of scharges. Upwelling was suspected to maintain
baseline flows and the site appeared to have good rearing habitat.. An IFG-4
\;;as ected because of the non-uni flow conditions; and channel
size ..
sa 1 mon have been observed spawning in the site.. Juveni 1 i: chi nook fry
rear in the cha Access to and passage througr~ the site are not 1 i ted
a ow,
cali I model r site~ four data sets were
III-82
s g
~ § g
~ :(
3 ~
"" ~ "'
Fi III-25 ons 1 site de pi i ng
evations cali on scharges of 18,
, and 240 cfs.
111-83
eROS$ UC:'fiO" •
Suui-11 ~ ••
100 :zoo 300 ~
CIISTN<C£ ~y U:l"f' SAN>t ~<U.OPIN (I"T)
i CAOS& liii!CTlO., I j 31!11-tl • DO
$2!1 l
l
... ~
~r=== .... ,;:>e.,. j '-. _ ___,,...,-=-_ ':.0 0:0
1~ u--.,.~5<<·:·
Vi,
1!1 5 J \.1
I
6' J J..l --.,....----,---....---,.----.----.--.---.---,
0 '00 :l{)C ::lOO oOO
g
'l: Q
~
~
C:ii.OS:S UCTIOH il
Sl&tiott le _. ;tG
c;:::s
1320 ... :z•o c~a
l.SOQJI ~5c!o $<:11'
I!•$
0 Hltl
o;srN«:~t mow u::n B~WK )<EAOI"lr< {I'T)
11>5
gure III-25., Cross sections for 131.7L study site depicting water
surface elevations calibration discharges of 1~,
55~ 150, and 240 cfs
III
Plate III-6 .. Modeling site 132.6L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem discharge: 23,000 cfs.
~·
~
,A.
I" .•
,~,St.-·
Table III-
The i
cross
Hydraulic data available
131.7Lo
Flow
(cfs)
840927 18
ired a
ion .. A la ri
157
250
zero
e area below
calibr~te I
ow value to
si
Discha
(cfs)
1
assi
led
for site
each
Zel"'O cross section one .. se a profile wats not
r si zero flow was es i ve
cali on
1 wa su e1 ons were maintai across three cross
in si cross ion 2, ter area al left
a lower surface 1 \•;as raised
ma in a cross sections 6
a 7, a area rai the hi ons
main v-1as l cross ons mai in a
wa across cross s ons. solt al
k cross ion 7 was a area whi a 1owPr s e
II
than the main channel.. These streambed e·levations were also r3ised {Figure
III ) ..
A plot depir.t·ing the observed and predicted water surface profiles for the
calibration ows as well as profiles for the extrapolation limits is shown in
Fi re I I I -27 tl Above 600 cfs, the re 1 i ab i 1 i ty of the stage and ve 1 oci ty
predictions decrease ..
To calibrate the IFG-4 model with respect to stage, comparisons were made
WSEl vs. q curve and the model predicted water surface elevations
(Fi re III-28). Similar comparisons were made at each cross section however,
~~ schar9e cross section is sho\vn here~
The performance of the ca 1 i bra ted mode 1 can be eva 1 uated by comparing the
cted water surface
( e .. 2).. The
evations, discharges and velocity
fference in observed and predicted
wa surface elevations is generally less than 0 .. 03 ft.. The largest
fference in observed and predicted discharges is 5 percent ..
factors 0 .. 92 to 1 .. i indicates
sui y calibrated ..
on: Fi re .7 are scatter ots of observed
oci es .. A iable lie model should be abl!e
same of ve1oci as in the e1d. The
ions i the is i accurately .. The
cal are shown in Table B-5. For both depth
velocity
models are
predicted
to predict
one-to-one
results
velocity
III-87
MEASURED ADJUSTED
625 525
s g
z z
0 0
~ s: ~ ~ 620 d 320
w w w ::J
::J a::
~ 1-I
515 f§l5
f!1,J 613
:0 tOO 200 .lOCI 0 100 ::zoo ~00
OISTA.""JCt FROM U:FT BANI< HEAOPlN {FT)
1325
s
z g
~ 9 &20
w
w
::I
0:::
I-
'!P~
51:3 400
513 +----,---__,------.---........ --.....-
0 200 300 100
O!STANCE Fi=tOM I..El'i SANl< HEADPIN (Fi)
],..--.,. .. \
620 '""' --..l"' \
"
400 0 100 200 :300 400
DISTANCE: !"ROM u::;:-r e.>.."'< -i':AOP!N (P'T)
and u cross s ions
si
I I
face Elevation
--Profile (Calibration Flow)
-----(Model Limits Flow)
---Stage Zero Flow
Streambed
---61 --
618 ----· ______ .,.,.,.,.-. _ ____.. ... ..----
0 +00 2 + 45 9+45 16
Figure III~·27. Comparison of observed and predicted water surface profiles from calibrated
hydraulic mode') at 131. 7L study site.
ITE Fl
Fi re III-28. ison between
and the
age-flow
131 ..
relati
cross
ip for s
ion 3.
• Predicted water surface elev ons
from calibrated hydraulic model.
BaHon ran a of model
e elev
ionship
ions forecast by
131.7L cross
cali
ion 3 ..
hydraulic
comparison, the RMSE 0 is nearly equal to the RMSE, an indication the model is
good.. The index of agreement is 0.99 for depth and veloci another
indication how well the model is predicting$
The breaching discharge for the site was estimated at 5,000 '
and channe 1 flow becomes cant ro 11 ed by the rna ins tern at about 7, 400 cf s ..
Baseline flow conditions of 5, 10 and cfs occur at 5,000, 6,000, and 7,000
cfs mainstem, respectively* Above 7,400 cfs~ an IFG-4 model was calibrated
for si flows of 15 to 600 cfs {i,400 to 19,300 cfs mainstem), an excellent
rating was assigned. An overall rati
model between 19,300 and ,000 cfs.
of unacceptable was assigned to the
The application range and ratings are summari below in the bar chart.
J 1
14000 22000
Mainstem Discharge, cfs Excellent
l I
30000
Unacceptable
gure I I I -29a pro vi de surface area and response curves for this site,
Because this side channel conveys mainstem water at 5,000 cfs y d
water suitabi 1 i criteria were used for juvenile i nook. The pronounced
increase in ces as mainstem di rge increases from 5, to 8
cfs ( Fi re ) is associ a ted w i a d increase in \vetted area
sessi sui le rea velocities rather than a change f1rom clear to
id wa r habitat discussed at other study sites.
III-91
F
4000 8000 !2000 20000 24000 28000 32000 36000 40000
B
80000 -r-----------------------------
72000
• 64000
56000
48000
...........
,....: 401)!10
l.L.
. 32ll00
24000 ~
III
4000 12000 16000 26000 32000 35GGO
area
functi
1 on nsi and near head
is s i
curve increases 5 a la
1 des le chi
rea At fl OV/S s 1 area is
unsui es si al dill: ini
y.
area curves s rec~as
an I ca a
mai A
was curves as ns increas
5) ~
I III-) i i me se \ e
s
n a1 exi summer
i re
s i rea
si
s
on: is 1 the tream
st
s c
w
1--f
U1
55000
5i!i00
48000
44500
4:1 000
37500
34000
30500
27000
23500
20000
7500
6750
6000
5250
4500
:rt5o
3000
22~)0
1500
n;o
Figure III-30.
JUN AUG
JUN AUG
MONTH
Time series pl ile chinook salmon WUA as a ion of disc
t·1 20 to 15, 1984 131 7L modeling site.
low areas., Cross sections 2 and 4-8 describe the deep, slow oci
areas_ A small backwater area is present on the left bank of cross section 9
( re III-31).. Silt and sand substrate is predomina rough the deep
a rea 1 e cobb 1 e and rubb 1 e substta tE. is generally found in the sha 11 ow
areas. Vegetation, including horsetails, lines the eft bank of the
p d some cover ..
nne 1 s B C breach mai di s~!":J rges of ,000 and 4,5 cfs.
ow
small
s
i
water is ponded and eventually es up ..
be: I site ow at 25,000 cfs and redirects a
ow from the si A~ A backwater area is
n
site was ected sma 1 si s that remain sma11
a la I was se 1 e,cted because
smal size and non-uni ons
1 t sa in si
juveni e rear in s ssage site are
sible
on: lib
c s
1
ion a are summa
is si
i le ..
I
-~ aJil
~ ...
~
~:::~
e:"*"
.:)
g = ~ g uo i !\34
>:'
~ < z: .
.:l
~ :r,
I ions ? 1 er
el s at C? i s
cfs.
-;;: t!J.O
2 ::;:
~
~
Z:'3
Ps:l•
-~ &..l~
~
~
4:12,
0::!-
i I 1 ss s 32 site i
ions calibration disch
III-
le III-11.
A 1 wa
ions is
data available
Fl 0\~
( )
27
141
surface eleva on did
r area on l si
area were raised so
surfaces same e1 ion ( re III
A i i observed
ca ti ows 1 as
y
evations are
ca 1 i the I 1
21,
occur .. cross ion
the channe 1 ~
1 main
) ~
surface 1es
1a on 1
in the
observed el
ictions e a si O\<J of cfs
rea se i as r 1i t of
1 1</as ca 1 i si ious
Fi s O\'VS a son vs q curve
wa r su ce ions cross ion n
sons were t"e on r dis cross
s
9
\va r
in
1
n
i ines~
s i 1 a r
ion
1 1-
;
§ 63C
< i:: ....
""'
52~·
'~~· 0
Fi I 2. sor· measul" cross s ion 9
629'
--62
2
6 6 .
25
624
623
0 + 00
Figure III ... 33.
2 3
Comparison of ser
raulic model at 1
r
low
G
e
and p ic wat
.6L study site.
F
II+
profiles cali
L 13 2.6 L
Figure III 34. rison er su e elev ions a
stag -flow rel ionship for 132.6L cr·oss s
re 1 i onsh·i p for s
cross s on 3
surface elevations
1 i c mode 1
calibr ed hydraulic model
ion 3*
cali can
wa su ions,
B re is no di
ons .. The i
8 as di
a
on: ots
re re
sian
i
ra
evaluated
the
rges
in
0 .. 87 1 ..
i
8)
are summari
'2200
stem Oischa
ca
and
on
se
i
s
e ra
n
e
su
mean at cross
(
a
ro1
1e
es
is
mains
rat
is
was ass
able
s si s a rnainstem d rge of 10
s mainstem ine .. associ ine in
su evi in gure III juvenile i
s the s 0\"1
ue previous 1 afforded juveni 1 e
d rge nes 5
su area and zero
area i were st th
I c calibrated mains tern
For ns dis
curves were usi a on as
i in e
i es 1 10 su
re
a to
a e 0\"i c i
A
i.3500C
• 1'20000
0 105000 _,
0
0
.._4
............
8
4000 8000 i2CGO 16000 20000 24000 280f.;0
25000 -r-------------------------------------------·---------·-------~
16000 28000
e j
sc e f
e
ear water ex
si t
a basis i areas
was se zero a
s
es s si v..~.v le i are
as Rea i r
e increases 11
discha were r mi level ..
s is 1 1 le tream of
Sl enters
site .. s sections 1 and 6 ne shallow
areas le cross section 5 a , slower
area re The va es rubble
the si s 1 jams are al
i
brea mai dis as as 5,000
appears a run.. Si
flows to mai of 23
II!-
200CO
UJJOO (\, i660C
14900
13200 \j \~ 11500
9800
8100
6400
·flOO
3000
MAY
2000
iBOO
1600
1400
t?.OO
1000
800
600
400
200
0
MAY
Figure III-36.
JUN JUL AUG
JUN JUL AU"' A b SEP
MONTH
Time series plots of juvenile chinook salmon WUA as a function of discharne fran
Mav 20 to Seotember 15. 1984 for 132.6L modelina site.
I! \1/0l>llV lHIIIH 1k 1\tlSOCIIIU~
1" =
Plate III Modeling site 136.0L on June 1, 1982 at mainstem discharge: 23,000
s
§
'< ~
"' !
s eeo
z
~ ·~ ~ w ... :::; 675 ::
£. 6.!.10
z
0
~
G
~
16$ ::. 1.!1:5 .r:
Fi
0
e III-37.
Section
~ 550
z g
~ ...
""' ::::. 67!1 ;:.
g sso
5 ~ ~ w
"" :::. !575 ;:
6: 6f~O
z
0
~ ~ w
w ::. C7!i ;:
Cross sections for 136.. study site depicting water
surface elevations at calibration discharges of 81,
153 and 265 cfs.
111-108
cha
i
small si was ected
n side s.. An I was
spawners
e inook de
s are 1 the
) .
order ibrate the I
were coll each cross section (
e III
uni ems were
de pi
cali ion ows
II
sons were
To
available
153
265
obse
1 as
calib
vs
1 de s
the ze
been in si Juve-
• Access i and
re range of discharges
111odel data
e III ).
i IFG-4 for si
rge
)
12
~.5600
is si lowi ca1ib on
water profiles
es r the at ion 1 i is
I model respect to s '
q curve predi
III-
0-+ 00 o +a a I ..a. 95 2., 91
Figure III-38 .. Comparison observed and predi surface profiles from cali model
1 .OL study site.
water surface elevations {Figure III-39). Similar comparisons we1c made at
each cross section however, only the discharge cross section is shown here.
The performance of the calibrated model is evident by com-
paring the observed and predicted water surface e 1 evati ons, discharges and
velocity adjustment factors (Table B-4 .. 4). The difference in observed and
predicted water surface elevations is usually 0.02 ft. The largest difference
in observed and predicted discharge is 3 percent.. The velocity adjustment
factors range from Oo99 to 1.01~ nearly a perfect correlation.
Verification: The scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and
velocities are shown in Figure B-2.9. There appears to be more scatter in the
depths than velocities but a one-to-one relationship can be observed from the
plot.. The results of the statistical tests are shown in Table B-5. Both
depth and velocity comparisQns of the RMSEU is nearly equal to the RMSE { .. 167
compa to ol70 and ~157 compared to @165)o The index of agreement for both
variables is 0.99, indications of how well the hydraulic model is predict~ng
depth.
tion: An excellent rating was assigned for site flows of 10 to 1,750 ........_..._ ____ _
corresponding 5,000 to 35,000 cfs mainstemj as shown below in the bar
chart.
.1 I I I I
6000
I 1 I 1
14000
I I
22000
Mainstem Discharge. cfs
I I I I
30000
Excellent
i I
III-111
Figure III-3!.\.
Extrapolation range of modal
LEGEND
-Stage-flow relationship for staff
IT FLOW A
gage 136.054 at cross settion 4.
• Predicted water surface elevations
from calibrated hydraulic model
Comparison between water surface elevations forecast by the calibrated hydraulic
model and the stage-flow relationship for 136.0L cross section 4.
Total wetted surface area and \vUA forecasts are provided for a mains
discharge between 5,000 and 35~000 cfs ( gure III-41a and b).. In the rst
figure both curves are plotted using a common ical scale and a.re expressed
in the same units. An eight fold increase in the vertical scale is used
Figure iii-4 Both the surface area and WUJ.\ curves for this site were
forecast using an IFG-4 hydraulic model ca 1 ibrated for mainstem discharges
rangirg from 5,000 to 35,000 cfs ..
Five of the six cross sections established at this small, high gradient side
channe 1 were 1 ocated in riffle zones.. The channe 1 cross section 1 acks the
gently sloped stream banks and gravel bars associated with other side
channels. Consequently, velocities throughout this site tend to exceed those
preferred by juvenile chinook salmon. Hence the rearing habitat potential
steadily decrectses between 5,000 and 18 cfs, but remains at nearly the
same level through 35,000 efs.. This is prima ly attributed to the large
amount of shoreline debris and undercut banks which exist at this site. When
this habitat response curve is compared to curves for other sites, it is
apparent that this site provides less rearing habitat on a per 1,000 ft basis
than most other side channels. However, because the surface area of this side
channel 1s also small, the proportion of the study site possessing suitable
chinook habitat is actually greater than the proportion of some of the larger
si channels.
influence of shoreline debris ~nd undercut banks on the temporal stabili
i ra habitat at this site is evident in the time series plots
presented as Figure III-42~ Despite the rather erratic pattern of daily site
III-114
0 32000
(J) -
II
SURFACE
4000 1200 i0400 13600 16800 20000 23200 26400 29600 32800 36000
8
4000 7200 10400 13600 16800 20000 23200 26400 29600 32800 36000
{CFS)
ections of gross surface area
as a ion
site.
II-115
5200
5780
5360
4940
4520
4100 -
3600
3260
21l40
2420
2000
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
2400
2150
1920
1680
1440
1200 w
f-960
1--t en 720
~so
240
0
MAY JUN JUL AUG
MONTH
Figure III-42. Time series pl s juvenile chinook salmon WUA as a nction of di from
May 20 to September 15, 1984 for 136.0L modeling site.
O\*IS ~ correspondi WUA indices are notably stable .. low ea
summer and fall streamflows result in an increased habitat is
ncrease is not as pronounced as that which occurs at si
sites.
Si ll
Site Descriptio~: This site is located on the left of Fat Canoe Island on the
\"'est bank of the Sus i tna River {Plate I I -8).. The study reach extends the
entire length of the site (1,780 ft) and ranges from 350 ft v1ide at the
ft wide at the head.. Six cross sections were established define the
deep, fast velocities in the channel (Figure III-43). The substra is large
cobble and bou'lder with a thick layer of sand along the right bank of the
lower three cross sections.. The available cover is provided by the large
substrate ..
The side channel s breached at scharges as low as 5JOOO cfs.
Si flows of 6,670, 2,470 and 1,710 cfs correspond to mainstem discharges of
~ 10' 1 cfs, respectively. s large study s~te was select-
to represent large side channels that remain side channels at 1o\v mainstem
discharges .. IFG-2 model \~as selected because of the large size of the
and its uniform shape .. Previous reconnaissance to t~e s ii indicated
itat was 1 i to the ri streambank rna n a limited
would be required is site T model .. 1
Sho ine velocities were co11ectec al streambank ma ns ..
III-1
Plate III-8. ~1odeling site 147pll on June 1, 1984 at mainstem disch
STAFF GAGE
--CROSS SECTION
1 f1 :::;; 250 I
23,000 cfs.
g
;
~ ...
"' !
g
~ ~
~
~
Fi III-43.
IU$
15::10
g
;::
9
~ 1.11'1
~ ;:
e~o
g
z ~ ...
:) :;
ons for 1
ions
ZCQ
OISTANCE 11'1014 l.!n SNco< MEAOP!N (FT)
<>OO
.ll study si depicting water
calibration discharges of l
III 19
t salmon not been observed at site however some juveniles were
observed along right bank ..
Calibrati The data available to model the site included 1 surveys for
all six cross sections and the hydraulic data summari in Table III-13.
Table III-l3o Hydraulic data avail e to calib
147.1l ..
the IFG-2 model for si
840917
3
940907
840829
840828
840821
"'W
1907
2154
5300
5600
)
Discha
(cfs)
8130
9000
10,700
17,400
,000**
20,
Cali on
Cross Sections Type*
2,4 D
1,3,5 s
4 D
1,2,3,4,5,6 s
5 D
1,2,3,4,5,6 s
1,2,3,4,5,6 s
* D = Discha measurements (includes mid channel and shoreline measure-
ments) ..
S = Shoreline measurements ( not incl mid channPl measurements)
** = usted to instantaneous discharge
models were requi simulate si channel hydraulics over the mdinstem
35,000 This is mainly due to increasing proportion
1 conveyance in she 1 f area a 1 ong the ght bank at high
flows 1 es were loped at each cross section based on
site flows 1,907 and 5,600 cfs for the low and high flows hydraulic models,
III-120
res ively.. In calibrating the two models with respect to depth, predi
water surface elevations at cross sections 2 through 6 were compared to water
sut .. face elevations calculated from the rating curves over a wide range of
flows. Water surface profiles based on IFG-2 output for the ca'libration ows
1,907; 2,154; 2,650; 4,742; and 5,300 cfs and for the flows correspondi
to mainstem scharges of 5,000 and 35,000 cfs are shown in Figure III-44 ..
Observed water surface elevations for the calibration flows and rating curve
water surface evations for the model limit flows are also shown.
Veri gures B-2o9 and B-2.10 show ocity profiles produced by the
two IFG-2 models cross section 2 for calibration flows of 1,907 and 5,600
cfso The observed velocities for those ows are also plottedo The figures
demonstrate that the of nnn values that produces the proper velocity
profile the low flow not accurately produce that of the high flow, and
vice versa ..
Application: low ow model represents site conditions for mainstem
sc rges up to 13,500 , while high flow model is applicable for
mainstem discharges greater than 13 500 cfso This breakpoint corresponds to a
si ow of 3,500 cfs.. Limits for which the models can be considered excel-
lent range of avail e stage information. Models were extrapolat-
ed data range down to 5,000 in the 1 ow flow mode 1, and up to
,000 ~in the high flow mode 1.. overa 11 rating for both mode 1 s is
lent ..
II!
818
-
6
812
810
0+00
Figure III-41.
--
-----
------
--------
LEGEND
OBSERVED WATER SURFACE £'LEVATIOH
RATING CURVE WATER SURFACE ElEVATION
PREDfCTED WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
(CALl BRA TJON FLOW)
P8EDICTEO WATER SURfACE PROFILE lMOOEL LIMIT FLOWSJ
3t '7+17
STREAMBED
4
IOtOO
STATION (feet)
·.('\.Q-:":"; STREAMOED
5 CROSS SECTION NUMBER
13t 35
Comparison of observed and predicted water surface profiles from calibrated model
147.1L study si
6
The application range and ratings are summarized below in the bar charto
.t l i ! J I t 1 l j J J
6000 14000 22000
Mainstem Discharge~~ cfs
l I J I
30000
~ Excellent
wetted surface area and juvenile chinook WUA response functions for this
study site, shown in Figure III-45a and b may be considered fairly
representative of mainstem channel areas.. The ratio of juvenile chinook lvUA
surface al,.ea at this site is very low.. Williams (1985) demonstrated that
suitable rearing areas in large side channels of the middle river are
marily confined to nearshore zones, due to high {non-suitable) velocities
existing elsewhere in the channelsQ Figure III-45b indicates a slight
increase in juvenile chinook ~JUA with increasing discharge. However when
viewed in perspective with wetted surface area, juvenile chinook WUA may be
considered relatively constant between 5,000 and 35,000 cfso
The surface area and WUA response functions were forecast using the high and
low flow IFG-2 models previously described and the HABTAT model~ Because this
large side channel conveys mainstem water at discharges \a.~ell bE~low 5,000 cfs,
only turbid water suitability criteria were used.. The separate WUA curves
forecast the high and 1 ow flow mode 1 s were simi 1 a r within the range of
ap and intersected between 20,000 and 21,000 cfso Therefore 5 WUA
p icted by the low flow model was used for discharges of up to 20,500 cfs;
above this discharge the high flow model was used.
III-123
300000 l !
270000 : WETIED SU'lFACE ~ I
-= 240000 ~ --------I
21oooo~ ~ 1
~ iBOOOO ~ I
r..: 1soooo ~ I ~ 120000 1 I
90CIOO 4 I
<( I
1
,
1
1 ~ 60000 -i
<( 30000 ~ WUA I
o~J--~~==~~==~~~==~~~~~
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000 36000 40000
MAINSTEM DISCHARGE (CFS)
8
12000
iO!IOO
1-9600
I.J.....
0 8400
0
0 7200 ....-I ......... _
6000
4800
3600
<:(
w 2400 0::
<(
ic~OO
0
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000 36000 40000
MAINSTEM DISCHARGE (CFS)
Figure III ions of
chi salmon
the 147.1L modeli
ss surface area and WUA of juvenile
it as a function of discharge for
site.
III-124
Because of its large size and low breaching discharge, the site flow
hydrogra strongly resembles that for the mainstem throughout the open water
season (Figure III-46)~ The me series plot tor juvenile chinook WUA
responds little streamflow fluctuation because of the relatively constant
amount of i ne habi t that ex i A similar time series response is
evident the 136 ... 0L site where rearing habit~t is also restricted to
ine margins because of unsuitable mid channel velocities
III-1
w
J-..._..
(f)
12000
11100
10200
9300
8400
7500
6600
5700
4800
3900
3000
13000
H700
10400
9100
7800
6500
5200
3900
2600
1300
0
MAY
MAY
Figure III-46 ..
JUN JUL AUG SEP
JUN JUL AUG SEP
MONTH
Time series plots of juvenile chinook salmon WUA as a functioh of disrharge from
May 20 to September 15, 1984 for 147.1L modeling site.
Aaserude, R.J., J. i e, and D. Trudgen. Categori on of c
habi in the 1 keetna-to-Devi 1 Canyon of tna River,
ates and Alaska.. iminary draft report. E. Woody and As
c ronmental on and
i rbanks 0 A 1 as Power· Authority.
Procedures
of Fish
, May
Game~ Susi
-June
Authority, Anchorage, pp.
Center~ University
i Hydroe 1 c Proj
aska~
1
ic Studies.. 1984.
nal draft"' Report for aska
rrett, R.. , F .. M. Thompson, and S .. N.. ck .. 1984.. Report • 1.. Adult
anadromous sh i ions, May
c Studies, aska of
Authority, Anchorage, AK. Document
, K.D.. A gui
incremental methodology ..
on .. 12 ..
stream
U.S. Fish and
1 vol ..
October Susitna Hydro
and Game.. Report for aska
1 vol ..
analysis using the instream flow
ldlife Serviceo Instream ow
E.. Woody and sociates and Woodward-Cl Consul 1985.
Instream ow relationshi report.. ume 1.. Working draft., Alaska
Authori Susitna Hydroelectric ect.. 1 vol ..
inger-Kingsl 't S. 1 Response aquatic su areas
mainstem scharge in
ver, J~laska. Draft
Authority. itna
Talkeetna-to-Devil Canyon reach i
E. Woody hey and sociates ~
,.....,....-,..,. .. c 1
in, R. IFG-4 program user's u.s(; Fi Wil i Service ..
pp ..
Milhous, R.T ~ D .. l. , and T.. e~ 1984~
and
Users guide i
Schrni
Habi mulation UeSe 1 i Service ..
Flow I on Paper llo FWS/OBS Revi ~ 475 pp ..
, D.C~<» et al ..
i igations (
rtment of
' Document
Report • 2.. i
October 1983). Susi
Report for
1 vol.,
aska Power
c Studies,
ty,
Steward, III, C.R. ( preparation) .. ddle river aquatic habi reportc E
Susitna
i
Associ
and ates .. Report.. aska Power Authori
c 1
i i 1 i ty a recommended for use in I FR ·
studies mi e Susitna ver.. E., Trihey and
i memorandum. 11
Trihey, E .. W.. 1979. The IFG incremental Pag~s in G .. L ..
Smith, ed.. Workshop in instream fl<'w habitat criteria and modeling ..
Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Colorado State
Fort Collins~ CO.. Information Series No .. 40 ..
versi
1980. Field data reduction and coding procedures for use th
IFG-2 and IFG-4 hydraulic simulation models. Instream Flow Service
U.S. Fish 1 ife Service, Fort Collins9
Trihey, E.W .. , and N .. D.. Hilliard.. 1984.. Supplemental guidelines for
calibrating! the IFG-4 hydraulic model. In Bredthauer, S .. R .. , chairman ..
aska•s Water: A critical resr·rce~ Proceedi of the Alaska Section,
P..merican W,ater Resources Asscciation.. Institute of Water Resources !t
versi of aska.. Fairbanks, Alaska. Report lWR 106. 1
1 iams,. S.. 1985.. The influence of project flows on hydraulic aspects of
si charnel rearing habitats in the middle river for the
20 to September 15.. E .. Woody Trihey and ASsociates, Technical
lmott, C .. J.. On the validation of models, physical geography 2.. V.H.
and Sons.. p.. 1
SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC CONDITIONS
AND HABITJlT FORECASTS AT
1984 MIDDLE RIVER STUDY SITES
DRAFT REPORT
Aooendix A
Summary of site-spec1fic data collected to develop
relationships between mainstem discharge, site flo1w
and water su1face elevation
Prep a red for:
ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY
Prepared by:
Ne Diane Hilliard
Shelley Williams
E .. Woody Trihey
R. Curt Wilkinson
Cleveland R. Steward, IIt
1985
APPENDIX FIGURES
re A-1 .. 1 Stage discharg~ curves for cross ions 1, 3' 4, 6, 7
and 9 at si 101.2R ..
Fi re .. 2 discha curves cross sections 2 and 5 at
101 .. 5L.
gure 1.3 Stage discharge curves for sections l, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at si 112.6L.
re 1 .. 4 Stage di curves cross ions 1, 2, 4 and 5
site 1
.. 5 discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 4, 5,
, 8 and 9 site 132 .. 6L.
Figure .6 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1' 2, 3, 5
and 6 te 136,.0L.
Fi A-1.7 Stage di rge curves cross ons 1,. 2, 3, 5
and 6 at si 147.1L ..
.APPENDIX TABLES
Table A-1 .. 1 .. Summary of si pecific data collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 101 .. 2R.
Table 1.2 .. Summary of site-specific da collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 101.5L ..
Table A-1.3. Summary of site-speci c data collected for rating curve
analysis 101 .. 7L ..
le 1.4 .. Summary of si pecific data collected for rating curve
anal is at RM .. 8L.
Table .. 5 .. Summary of site-s ific data collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 112.
Table A-1 .. 6 .. Summary site-speci c data collected for ng curve
analysis RM 114.1R ..
e A-1 .. 7 .. Summary of si pecific collected for rating curve
ysis at RM 1 .. OR.
Table 1 .. 8. Summa of si ific data collected for rating curve
analys s at RM 118.
le A-1 .. 9 .. Summary site-speci c data call for ng curve
analysis at RM 119 .. 1L.
Table A-1 .. 10 .. Summary of si pecific coll for rating curve
analysis at RM 119.,2R ..
Table 1.11 .. Summa of ific collected r rating curve
anal s at
le A-1 .. 12 .. Summary of site-spec1 c data collected for ng curve
analysis a RM 130 .. 2R ..
le 1.13 .. Summary of site-specific call for rating curve
anal is at RM 1 .. 3L ..
Table 1 .. 14 .. Summa of si fie data collected r' rating curve
anal s RM
le A-1~~1 Summary site-speci c data lected for ra ng curve
analysis at 132.6L ..
le IG16 .. ry of si pecific ta co11 for rating curve
is at RM .. 8R ..
Table 1 17 .. i fie da collected r rating curve
2:~---------------
GRG£ 101.251
A
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5,000 ~ 0 t... 10,300 cfs
UO EQUATION DEVELOPED
6: CONTROLLED
10,300 ~ 0 ~ 27,700 cfs
WSEL = 10·l.)l OO.SO + 355
Ul
B
r2 :: 0.99
n = 6
100
A: NOT CONTROLLED
s.ooo ~ 0 4 14,000 cfs
NO EOUATION DEVELOPED
8: CONTROLLED
A
14 1 000 ( 0 4 27;700 cf&
~ISEL = 10-2749 o0 • ?G + 355
lO
:::: 0.96 = 4
MRINSTEM DISCHARGE AT BOLO CREEK llOOOCrSl MAlNSTOi OlSCHfiRiil£ RT GOLD CRE:f:K UOOOCfSJ
Figure A-1.1 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 3, 4, 6, 7
and 9 at site 101.2R.
100
Table A-1 .. 18 .. Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 137 .. 5R ..
Table A-1 .. 19 .. Summary of site-specific data coliected for rating curve
analysis at RM 138.7L.,
Table A-1 .. 20., Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 139 .. 0L ..
Table A-1.21 .. Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 139 .. 4L.
Table A-1.22~ Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve
analysis at RM 147 .. 1L ..
-,
A
h. rl~T ~JNTROLLEO
5,000 :: 0 "'-10,300 ch
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B: CONTROLLED
10,300 ~ 0 ~ 27 8 700 cfs
WSEL u 10~l.ll OO.SO + 355
10
8
r2 ;;: 0.99
n == 6
UlO
GllGE 101.292
A: NOT CONTROLLED
s.ooo ~ 0 ' 14,000 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B: CONTROLLED
A
14,000 ( Q 4 27,700 cfs
WSEL = lo·2749 o0 •76 + 355
UJ
g -,
B
r 2 = 0.96
n == 4
HAINSTD'I OISCHARGE: AT BOLO CRE:E:K C lOOOCfSJ HRINSTEM DISCHARGE AT GOLD CREEK llOOOCfSl
Figure A-1.1 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 3, 4, 6, 7
and 9 at site 101.2R.
100
1
GRGt: 101. 2SJ
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5~>000 ~ 0 t:. 1 0! 300 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVElOPED
8: CONTROllED
A
10,300 ~ 0 ~ 27,700 cfs
WSEL c 10·0.02 o0 •21 + 355
10
ra = 0.95 (\ = 5
100
2~-------------------------------------------------/. ~ SAGE 101.254
A: NOT CONTROllED
5»000 ~ Q ._ 10 9 300 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B: CONTROllED
10J300 .(. 0 '-27~700.ch
WSEL = ~o-0761 o0 •36 + 355
r 2 = 0."95
n = 5
it-----------~----------~-----------------------~ MAINS!EM DISCHARGE AT GOLD CREEK ll000C~S3 NAINSTEM DISCHARGE Af0 GOLD CREEK (lOOOCfS) 100
Figure A-1~1 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 3, 4~ 6, 7
and 9 at site 101.2R~
~?---------------------------------~------------~ /.
-.
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5,000 ~ 0 ~ 14,000 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B: CONTROLLED
14 000 L 0 '27,700 cfs ws~L = ~o-o:ss oo.3s + 355
10
r 2 ::: 0.97
n c: 3
100
SAG£ lOl. 2SS
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5 000 ' 0 ~ 10 8 300 cfs
J -
NO EQUATlON DEVELOPED
B: CONTROLLED
10 300 4. Q '-.27,700 ch WS~L i%11 l0 .. 3:17 00.86 + 360
I
A
10
B
ra = 0.99
n = 4
HAINSTEH OlSCHARS£ RT QOLO CREEK ilOOOCfSJ HFUNST£11 O!SCHRRGE AT GOLD CRE:EK llOOOCfSJ
Figure A-1 .. 1 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 3, 4, 6, 7
and 9 at site 101.2R.
lai
~.~------------------------------------------------~
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5~000 ~ 0 L 10,300 cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B: CONTROLLED
10,300 L Q ~ 27b700 cfs
WSEL = ~v-3734 o0 ·92 + 360
A
10
B
r2 ~:~~ 0.97
100
A: NOT CONTROLLED
s Rooo ~ o .(... 1 o.3oo cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
6: CONTROLLED
10,300 ~ Q: 27,700 cfs
WSEL = 10~l.?l o0 •56 + 360
MAINSTEM OISCHARG£ AT GOLD CREEK {JQOOCfSl 10 MAINSTEM DISCHARGE AT GOLD CREEK ClOOOCfSl
Figure A-1 .. 1 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 3, 4, 6, 7
and 9 at site 101.2R.
100
Figure A-1.1
2:?---------------------------------------------~
SRGC: l01.2M1
5)000 ~. 0 4-.27,700 ch
WSEL a 10·}.0l o0 •64 ~ 3GO
.• +------...---......,_.......,..ao--------.-..........,.-...,....,,m
MAlNSTEH OISCHARG£ AT GOLD CR££K CJOOOCfS)
Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 3, 4, 6, 7
and 9 at site 101.2R.
A: CONTROLLED
A r 2 u 1. 00
n t:; 3
sfooo :: Q "'-7.980 ch
WS£L ~ 10°·02 o0 •11 + 360
B: CONTIWU.EO
<.. Q <-:~5 000 cfs
e:-1o"'l'.:n ~ Qo.ss + 36CJ
Figure /\-1.2
a
,., 0.99
n ~~'" 33
li)f,
·.~.--------------------------,.
CONTROllED
sbooo & .. 0 4., 16~'•00 ch
WSEL -10·0 •15 QOoZl + 360
CONTROtU:O
16,.400 ' Q <. l5*0'JO ch
wsEL a 1o~o7eo o 0 •3 ~ + 360
A
B
rl ~ 0.97.
n Q 13
Stage discharrJe cur·ves for cross sections 2 and 5
s·i 101'"5L.
XI(;
CONlROLL£0
.:= 0.99
n ~:~ 6
7 ( 0 ( 1 0 j lj 00
WSEL 51 00.32 + 445
Fi re A-1.3 di
6
CONTROLLED
15,300 4 0 '24,000 ch.
WSEL = 10~0~66 o0 •31 + 445
n u 3
i~-----.----------~--~----------------~~~ 10 100 MAINSTEM OlSCHARGE At GOLO CREEK (1000CfSl
ons 1., 2, 3,
0------------------------------------~~--------~
f,A(,[ I I 2 3' I
~000 ~ Q ~ 35r000 cfs
=-,0 ~-u.n 0 o.'3a + 41.5
r 2 = 1.00
n t:c 7
Mct: NS T'CN o 1 sr .ftflf\1 ;c wuJ c1~CEK , Inr;!jcrs 1
CONTROLLED
SsOOO :--0 4.. 35,000 ch
WSEl ~ 10·3 ·69 o0 •99 + 450
;'
r 2 = 0.99
n = 9
i·~----~------~--~-~~~~0~----------~--------~~ MAINSTEM OISCHRRGE AT OOLO CREtK c lOOOOfS) 100
Figure A-1~3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at site 112.6L~
~
0 In
'<3"
!:.
~
)::>
t
t.O
2:~------------~--------------------------------~
GAG£ 112.392
CONTROLLED
7,080 ~ 0 ~ 10~600 cf$
WSEL :::-10·1 •64 o0 •50 + d1SO
1o
r 1 ·= 0.94
n i;J 6
MAlNSTEM DISCHARGE AT SOLO CREEK (JOOOCf~
100
~
~
!
~
9:~------------~--------------------------------~
!12.352
CONTROllED
15,300 ( 0 ~ 24,000 cfs
wsEL = ~a·S:19 o1.34 +~so
r 2 ~ 0.98
n = 3
i·~---------------.-.----~-----------------------J HAINSTEH OlSCHRRG£ Rf 0 GOLO CREEK !lOOOCfSl 100
Figure A-1 . 3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at site 112.6L.
~~--------------·--------------------------------~
SRG£ i 12. 3XJ
CONTROLLED
7,080 "-0 '-10,400 ch
WSEL =-1o-T·20 o0 ·42 + 450
10
r:t 11':1 0.94
n c 7
100
CONTROLLED
10 BOO .t. 0 t. 24v000 cfi ws~L = ~o-1751 oo.so + 4SO
10
/
eo1.00
a:: 3
MAINST01 DISCHARGE At OOl.O CRE:O< € lOOOCFSl 11R!NSm1 OISCH..ARG£ AT GOLD CRED< ( lOOOCfSl
Figure A-1.3 St?ge discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at site 112.6Lo
100
~
0
U'l r
~
1-1
~
SiT--------------=--------------------------------~
GAGE 112. 353
CONI ROLLED
5,000 '0 ~ 35,000 cfs
WSEL =-10-I.OB o0 ·64 + 450
10
r2 = .99
n = 9
MAlNSTEM DISCHARGE AT GOLD CREEK ClOOOCfSl 100
~
0
U1
!
~
CONTROLLED
7 ~ 0 BO ""-0 (... 1 0, 4 00 c f $
WSEL =-10·~·37 o0 •26 + 450
rl = 0.99
n = f
lO
MAINSTD'I DISCHARGE: AT GOLD CREEK llOOOCf'S)
Fiqure A-lo3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at site 112.6L.
100
N
0
In
!
~~----------------------------------------------~ S3AG
GAGE 112.35:5
CONTROLLED
7,080 ' 0 ' 10,400 cfs
WSEL ~-10°~30 o0 ·16 + 450
!O 100
CONTROLLED
7 ~080 '0 '-1 0,400 ch
WSEL ==-10~()·36 o0 •27 + lA50
= C.99
n = 6
MAINSTEM DISCHARGE AT GOLO CREEK (1000Cf5) i~------~--------~----~~~0--------------~.-·----~ HAINSn:M DISCHARGE fiT GOLD CREEK ( !OOOCF'Sl
Figure A-1.3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2~ 3, 3a,
4, 5~ 6 and 8 at site ll2o6Lo
0
l.ii
!
-,
SftG£ 112. JX"!i
CONTROLLED
1S,300 ~ 0 ~ 24 1 000 efs
WSEL ~ l0"0720 o0 ·24 + 450
to
rl = 1.00
tOO
4C
CONTROLLED
7,080 l Q ( 10,800 efs
WSEL =-10~l.l? o0 •47 + 450
10
r" = 0.99
n = 5
MAINSn::tt OlSCHARGE AT GOLD CRE:£:1< l lOOOCFSJ HAINSTDI OlSCHflRGE: AT GOLD CRE£1< ( 1000Cf5)
Figure 1 .. 3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at si 112.
GHG[ 1
1 ,00
2!+ )000
o:16 0o.36 • 450
HA I NSTCM OJ SCHflRGE CREfJ< r wooers l
1.3
CONTfWLLED
5 000" 0 "'-3Sh000 cfs
WSEL .71 00.36 + 450
!1'1> 0.99
::;;: 8
i~, ------------~------~--------------------~ w .~ MAINSTEH DISCHARGE AT GOLD CREEK (lOOOCfSl
discha curves for cross sections l, 2, 3, 3a
6 and 8 at si 112.6L~
CONTROllED
15;300 < 0 4 24,000 cfs
WSEL = l 1:13 o0 ·45 + 450
10
.:: 1.00
:; l
100
SAGE 1 12. 3X6
CONTROLLED
s 000 L Q ' 35,000 cfs W~EL c-10·n·92 o0 ·42 +.450
10
rl = 0.99
n a 6
MA I NSTEH 0 I SCHARGE: AT GOLD CREEK ( 1 OOOCfS l MAINST£M OJSCHARQE RT GOLD CRE£K llOOOCfSl
Figure A-1.3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5» 6 and 8 si 112~6L
100
~
"" !.
~
~
m
rt = 1.00
n
~
~
!
~
at?-----------------------------------------------~
CONTROLLED CONTROLLED
9JOOO t.. 0
f'JSEL = 1
ds
·38 + 450
lQ
MAlNSTEH DJSCHARSE AT GOLD CRE:EK ( lODOCfSJ
Figure A-1.3 Sta
4, 'Jl
100
9,000 ~ 0 ~ 24~000 cfs
WSEL 10-0.GB o0 ·38 + 450
MRJNSTEH OISCHARSE CREl:l( t i OOOCfS l
discha curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
6 and 8 at site 112.6L.
iOO
~
IJ)
In
"'f'
.!..
~
s:~-----------------------------------------------,
SfQ: 112. JXB
rl = 0.98
!'I t= 5
CONTROLLED
7 500 t 0 ""-1 ·t ,600 ch
• -~0 -~.s, 0 t.o2 +~55 WSEL 13 I
~
~
'lit' .!.
~
HJ
CONTROLLED
5~000 ~ Q ~ 35;000 cfs
WSEL ~ 10·1 •03 o0 •41 + 455
r2 = 1.00
n = 7
MAINSTEM OlSCHARG£ CRED< OOOOCF"Sl lC HAINSTEH DISCHARGE AT GOLO CREEK £1000Cf5)
Figure A-1.3 Stage discharge curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 3a,
4, 5, 6 and 8 at site ll2o6L.
aoo
~
In
0
f
~ .X
~·r------------------------------------------------.
GAG£; 119. 2W 1
BACKWATER
5,000 I. 0 '-23~000 ch
wsEL ;:;-,o.:f.s 7 o 0 •51* + c;os
r2 ~ 1.00
n c: 6
... 1.,_.. __ ..,.. __ ..._,._
10 100 MAWSTl11 JlSCHfH\ A1' GOLD CRE:£1< t 1000Cf'5)
~ rz;;; 1.00
n ~::: 1l
~
~
BACI<WATE.R
5~000 ~ 0 L 23~000 Cf5 - -.. r.s WSEL ~ 10"'1 •6 ·l.~ + 505
i HAINSTEM OlSCHARQ£ CREf:K C tOOOCF'Sl
Stage discharge cu,·ves for cross sections J., 2, 4 and 5
at 51 119.2fL
119.2S2
23
62
cfs.
.55 505
Figure
A: NOT CONTROLLED
t010 : 0 cf~
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B CONTROllED
10.000 ! 0 ~ 23,000 cfs
WSEL a 1 ' B •69 + 505
100
CRf.t:K ( lOOOCfSl ClOOOOFSJ
a discharge urves for cross sections 1, 2, 4 a
at si 119.2fL
Figure: /,
A: NOT CONTROLLED
0 t. cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
B~ CONTROLLED
1 I. 0 .l, 23 fooo ch
WSEL 10·0783 00.41 + SOS
MAlNSltH OISCURRGt CREl.X f 1 f!OOCfS)
0
a
i rge curves for
119" 2ft
ions .1, 2 4 d 5
A: NOl CONTROLLED
5 ( 0 l. 11
NO EQUATION OEVELOf'fl)
B: CONHWU.EO
23 100
.06 'l
c BAO~WA TER
23,100 .' 0 '-
NO EOU!\ 1 ON DEVf: t OPU1
h
620
Fi re A-1 ..
0.99
n "" 6
cu
i 1
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5 1 000 4.. 0 "-11 n 900 C f 1i>
NO EQUATION DEVElOPED
0:: CONTROLLED
11 1.. :n 00 cf&
10 7 + 620
C~ BACKWATER
23 100 ; 0 ~ lS~OOO cfs
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
ions 1 2' ' 5,
c
r2 a 1.00
n ::; 5
r 4 0, 98
n 6
'A: NOT CONTROLLED
I.Q 11 Ct!>
NO EOUAT ON DEVELOPED
CONTHOLLED
11,900 '-0 J., 27~700 cfs
wsf.L ~ o~o·:-o6 oo, 19 62'1
r; u:crK 1 !C:':, ,1
1,.5
A ~JOT CONTROLLED
s~ooo:: o' 11 ,9oo cf!'
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
fS: CONTROLLED
n.900'-0 I. 27,700 cfs
WSEL a ~o 0 ·U 4 o0 ·20 + 620
0
A
discha curves for cross sections 1, 2, 4, 5~ a
6,. •· dot· 1 , d an ·' a .: s .,
A: NOT CONTROLLED
5 $000 4. 0 (.. 11 • 900 c t s
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
t3 CONTfWLLEO
11 ' 0 ~ 27,700 cf
WSEL • 10o.Ug o0 ·19 + 620
A
Figure A-1.5
r 2 0.98
n 7
'' ~ UOT COtn ROLLEO
SuOOO ~ 0 11 1 900 cf5
NO EQUATION DEVELOPED
A
()\[(K I I ()IJf;CF'J)
age discharge curves for cross
6, 7. 8 and 9 at site 132.6l.
ions 1, 2, 4, 5,
A:
NO EQUATION
COIHROLLED
1
\•JSEL
ch
• l + 620
Fi 1 .. 5 di cur·ves
at i 1
A
ll
NOT CONTROLLED
5 Qt.. 11 cf
NO EQUATI DEVELOPED
COUTROLLEO
11 900 0 L.. 27 ch
\JlSEL ~ 1 + 620
ros sect ons 1 4 5~
r 2 0.82
n
CONlfWt LED
5,000 L 0 ~ 35 000 cfs
WSEL 10~1 •59 QO.!i(i + 670
Figure A-1.6 s
a
CONTROLLED
Q (.
discharge curves for cross
at si 136.0L.
ch
49 670
r2 = 0.99
n 9
ions 1, 2, 3, 5
cf:.
.41 670
i
r:l 0.96
n 12
re 1 6 dis
at s "i
rge curves
1 .OL.
r eros
ch
26 670
sections 1, 'i 3
Fi re A-1.6
l)'.h
c:: 0.99
~ 10
JS ,000 ch
3300.29 ./r 670
Stage di scha
and 6 at site
curves for cross sections 1, 2, 3, 5
36.0L.
'·' rz ~ 1.00
CONTROLLED
5,000 < 0 ~ 35 1 000 cfs
WS~L 1 ~.?l 0°·76 + 810
Figure. Stage disc
and 6 at si
0 ..:l 6
CONTROl lEO
r cross sections 1 2 t 3, 5
( )
10
Figure A-1.7
r~ re; 1,00
n 7
CR[!)~ I 1 ()• /)!f ·'I
I.
!.J
t.J
(.
I)
CONTtWLLED
5 .ooo l. 0 L... 35,000 cfs
~/SEL =-10~ti.G 9 OC 37 ·~ 810
r:t ""1.00
n 7
age d·f scharge curves for cross sect·ions 1, 2, 3, 5
and 6 at site 147.1L.
cmHfWLLEO
5s000
igure l 7 curves r c s sec s 2 r J
l I 0 s collect curve n
1 ~
101 .. as t B~
1240 .. 8 1!1.300
840829 1806 360 .. 62 17 t
840808 1400 361 .. ,
1607 3.22 27,700
1 .. sa ct 1 ~ 6~
840925 1 .. 33 7 j
840924 1 ll af
361 8,
iJ/•0911~ 1 Iii 8,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 $I (cont .. ) col ct rat curve ana
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Flow
wi site (ft) (cfa)
--~Mili~-..... -b!il:llllil!lll!!llf~ fO!Mim:Hiitli'irb!latitlft:!lfi!WII!IIIillllll--~llimt!M.UIIIIIQibl!iilloi!lr.lillliW!a ~-----~~ ~ .... -~ .. ilf1lllf! .................. ~ ....... .... eli!JIIi ....... ~ .... -.. ....
.283 B ction 3 2 1600 361 n29 9,080
(cont.) 840912 36loJl 9j080
840903 1 361 .80 11,200
3 1350 361.83 11,200
1445 362$05 286 15,300
840829 1715 362 .. 40 17 ~
8l~0808 1250 362.97 2.311000
101.284 Cross Section 4 841006 11 36ltt23 6,780
840925 1407 1 ... .2 7,890
840924 1325 361 e 8,290
840924 1 ,, 8,
840914 1820 361 .. 8,800
840912 1515 361.28 9~080
840912 361.30 9,080
840903 1422 361 .85 27 11,200
840830 1627 362.97 270 15,300
840830 1606 362.98 270 15,300
840829 1718 3630134 17,400
840808 1245 363. 23,000
101.285 Cross tion 5 840924 361 .. 49 h o,.
840830 1638 363~08 0 15;300
840829 1647 363 .. 65 17,400
840808 1355 364 .. 36 ,000
IIJIIi!r¥llfiOI!IIII_..._~-------illllai ................. Uifll¥rJ ... ~·-------------------------------------------------------·-------------------
w w
1., t ( cont
.,.,...__*-*""*~""""" ........... --~lf'St_. ...................... ~ ..............
101 Cross ct 6
101., ion 7
.2S8 a Section 8
of
101.
cific
Date
-tM!<IIIfii!t':il!¥1@;2rMtN
11
1340
1830
1336
1345
840830
840829
840808
1145
1345
1335
840912 1308
840912 1315
840903 1
840830 1800
840829 1640
840808 1215
006 1145
840925 15
840924 1340
co lected curve ana lys
(ft) )
----~"~i':a~Oifil-................. ..,~ .... ~ .. --"""""'..__._...,.
.1
1.96 " 1.94 8,
1 .. 94 9,
1.99 9,080
362.39 11,
363.10 3 15,300
36Jo69 ,400
364.
361. 6,
1 0 7,
1.92 t
1.95 8,290
361.94 0 9~080
362 0 9,
362 19 11,
363. 255 15.
'
1.84 6 780
1 .. 90 1.1 1,
361.90 8,290
~~~~~-~~~-~~-~~~-~~--~--~~~~~~~~--~---~-~-~-~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-\~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e 0\ (conto) s e-specific data col t rat curve ana
at R.M,. 1 .. 2R.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
at
Date )
...,.lll!Sftiti<l'tti!¥Mo~lliN!Io---~!ll'li!B--@W:IIII!!!!$ll~..-----~--lih!St ...... IO'I!!!IU .... .,. ... ~ ..__.._._l!lltl!f_ ~ ....... flit ........ .. (f;fS...,tlll'llib'...,,.. ...... .... .-.~~~ ....... ~--~
101., Cross Section 8 840912 1239 lfi95 9,080
(conto) 840912 1245 362 @01 9~080
840903 1605 362 11,200
840903 362.43 19 11~200 *
840903 1605 362~~45 11,200
840830 17 50 363.50 236 15,300
840829 1542 363-92 533 17 ;400
840808 1210 364., 71 ,ooo
J01.2S9 Cross Section 9 840924 1350 362o77 8,290
840912 1145 " 9»080
840903 1605 "34 11,200
840830 1832 364.,01 9 15,300
840829 1818 364~37 17,400
840808 1200 364.97 23,000
101Q2Ml Head 840925 1300 362.93 7,890
8/ .. 0924 363e02 8,290
840924 1400 363 .. 8,290
840912 1130 363~30 9$080
840903 1700 363 .. 81 11,200
840830 1830 364~~62 15~300
840829 'II£~~ ~Lil": A'll li ,400 J.O.J..l .JO::hUl
840808 1200 365.7 2 23,000
~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 C lC col curve f:lna
(cfs)
-------------------------t\W ...... ~ ...... ----~--.. ... ..... fl'l!lt;!lt ........ ...... ., ..... .,. ................ fllllolf _ _...
841012 1 .. 1622 6,
841001 361.60 1696 7,830
840911 361.85 2213 9,330
840831 362.70 3530 14, * 840820 363.17 18,
840825 365 28 '900
101.2X2 ** ss Section 2 831103 1525 3621f57 4,500
831027 55 362.60 5,020
821012 1633 362~~73 7,950
002 362,70 7,980
821009 1030 362.89 8,440
007 1415 2.96 8,640
831011 1445 363.22 9,520
830916 0940 363 II 10,500
820822 1630 363.44 12,200
830911 1010 363~~55 12,200
820823 1124 363.47 12,300
831001 1505 363.83 13,200
820909 1250 J6Jo64 13,400
820813 1420 363 .. 70 13,600
820927 1825 363.83 13,800
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Instantaneous discharge est ted from time lag analysis.
**Same locat as 1982 and 1983 gage 101.2M4.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@2 (cont") of s cific col for curve ana is
a.t R ., 101 La.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Flow Discharge
in site Time (cfs) (cfs)
_._.. _____ ~l!ftltlltll't:Dll ...
---~--fll!l!llt~ ............... IJiii!IMiitl!!!l .... ~e!!!fll ... ~_._,.._OlD Mfe ......... l't!l*fiii1S:!~--..... _.. .. ft\WIII ..... ..... IIIDaD~-I/ll!lllli ..... itfr!li .......
101 .. 2X2 ** Cross Section 2 820903 1545 363 .. 97 14,600
(conto) 820831 364,.07 16,000
820807 1347 364 013 16$500
820808 1950 364 .. 22 16~600
830529 1045 364 ol4 17,000
830720 1835 364.40 18,600
830722 1850 364o45 18ll600
8307 20 0900 J64o49 18,600
830822 1220 364.76 219600
830805 1635 364.82 21,700
830619 1125 364 .. 90 231>000 w 830619 1830 364,;99 23,000 "' 830617 1142 364o95 23,300
830621 1730 365 .. 24 24,000
820920 1450 J65e39 24,000
830807 1450 365.25 25,000
820715 1110 365 .. 38 25,600
830808 1920 J65o6J 26,000
830703 1645 36 5.22 26 '200
830706 1405 365o27 26,300
830828 1052 36 5. 53 26,600
**Same location as 1982 and 1983 gage 101 .. 2M4.
Table (cont.) of site-specific data collected for rating curve analysis
• 101
Staff Gage Lo.cation WSEL Flow Discharge
Number in site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
&:H.... ~ea!i'i-------~Qma--EIII*rGIB__,t'i!IIDiblarlillllloiiR$itllliiiiiWB ---l.!liGI---------.-a. ..................... ............................. _
101.2X3 ***Cross Section 5 831103 1520 365~11 4,500
831027 1650 365 019 5,02:0
841012 365.23 6,210
831020 1645 365 .. 71 1,230
841002 365.70 7,980
831011 1441 365.92 9,520
830916 1020 366.03 10,500
830911 0930 J66e3J 12,200
831001 1530 J66e60 13,200
830716 1145 366.82 16,400
w 830529 1045 366 ... 85 17,000
.......e 830720 1830 367 .. 16 18,600
830722 1825 367.23 18,600
830822 1255 367.64 21,600
830805 1630 367 .. 72 21,700
830619 1120 367.68 ,.000
830617 1735 367.86 23,.300
830807 1455 368.07 J. ·· noo
830808 1900 368.36 26,000
830703 368 &02 26,200
830706 1400 368.11 26,300
830828 1055 368.24 26,600
*** Same location as 1983 gage 10lo2M6o
):::g
I
w
00
of site-spec ic data collect for rating curve analysis
at R • 10• .. 1L ..
----~--~~-~~---~--~----~-~----~~-~--~--~---~~-~--~---~---~--~-~~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~-~~-~-~~~---~-
~-~---~-~~---~~~-~-~---~~~~-~-~~-----~---~-~~N~-~-~-~----------~~~--~~-~~--~--~----~~-~-~~~--
Staff Gage Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
fiallo~-a!mC'Ili!IDIIIID-i!llli!iii'G!iii!IJ!!ill!!!ll l!lfliiC,.Q!I9fi'!JIII---II!Sil----&!li!!llll-f&llloeJIIIIBIImfl
__ WilD ___
-~---CIIIl!lt'
G!lfi!IIIS!I!!t __ G!I!Ift ___
G!illill--~ .............. ...,
.8Sl Cross Sect 1 841002 366o69 7»980
840921 1547 367~~86 11,400
840831 1126 368 .. 49 13,600
840830 1530 368.7 5 159300
840829 1530 369.,11 17~400
840713 1315 369.36 21,200
l02.0Pl Cross Section 3 841002 368o2l 7,980
840921 1640 37le 111)400
840830 1200 372.35 15,300
840820 372.80 18~500
840810 1600 373 .. 92 24~000
840825 1525 376 G 15 29,800
102<t0P2 Cross Section 4 841002 368.99 7:il980
840820 373.91 18,500
840810 1600 375.00 24,000
840825 1525 376 .. 45 29,800
col rat curve ana
ion
s Time )
eil.l'!ll'bti~Iftl'lill_fllllllll>_..,....,._._. ~--~ttd~WIIII»----~ ... ----~~~ --~~.-.---~----.-..-.a Cilira!titl\lli .. ~IIM'----e...lfli:!:Jifi~.-., .......... MWJiR
105 t 1 840928 397.31 7,3
841001 397 .. 47 7,830
397 .. ,70 8,800
1606 397.71 8~800
1500 9,
5 1 8 ion 4 1 320
7,
> 1., I w 8, \0 9,330
1. 13,600
1.68 15.300
1330 .74 15,300
15 2$10 18,
1155 2.94
1609 404.62
-----------------------------------------------------··--------------------------------------
curve ana
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ll2a
(
t 1
840822 1248
0 454.06
)
7
7,410
7,
8)
9,000
,400
15,
19,
24,000
7'1
8 280
8
800
15,
19,1
24,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.. 5 (cont.) c ic col rat curve ana
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
f Location Flow D1scharge
Number thin a Date Time (cfs) ( s)
~ .... !AM> .... ..,..~-~..,«<!!ll!!t ~--4MI=!IIItr.!\4llill!£1ft_.......,..,.lf.lt*w .... """"' ............. Vlll!!!filllll!!'lt!rM--~IIIllW!i ~~!!Wiil~!l!IM!I-~ ~----~·~~~ ................. Wfilt~~~o.MM
112 .. 3X2 Cross Section 2 841005 1500 451 .. 36 7,080
Left Bank 840929 1600 451.36 7, 0
840930 1540 451.43 7,500
840916 451 1 8,280
840913 451.78 9~000
84D905 452.10 I0.,4ou
840830 453 e 25 15,300
840822 1330 453 .. 67 19,100
840810 454.31 24j000
112.3S2C Cross Section 2 841005 1500 451., 7t080
(Low Flow) 840930 1540 452~06 7,.500
840916 452.14 8:1)280
14 1620 452al5 a,aoo
840913 1700 452.25 9,000
840904 452.40 10,800
112 .. 3S2B Cross Section 2 840830 452.85 15,300
(High ~"low) Right Bank 840822 1300 453 II 55 19,100
81~0810 455.22 24,000
----------------------------·--------------------------------------------------------------
.5 (cont.) of site-spec ic data collected for curve analys
at R • 112.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staf WSEL Discharge
Number Time (ft) (cfs) (cfaj
fte:I!I-IDf!'MtiiFI!t ...... e. ... '*-~ llllifeio!:!IM--~tiJ!I!lt.,..,.~-IIJINIII'~.-... *""'~ ..... ~ ... ~lltltrl!l ...................... .,.."*""' fl.liwj-~------~i'fJI!IIII ... ~--IttJ/!!;fl--..........
112"3X3C Cross Section 3 1500 452@54 7,080
( F t Bank 1605 452.52 7,410
0 1512 452o59 711500
6 452.68 8,280
4 1620 o68 8,800
840913 452o79 9j000
840905 452. 10,400
112. as Se,tion 3 ~ 12 10~
t 1352 454. 19,100
454.,62 24,000
1!2.3S3 Cross Sect 3 5 1500 452. 7,080
Right Bank 8lt0929 1640 452,56 7;410
840930 153'• 452!)60 71>500
840916 2 90 8,280
3 00 453 ~00 91)000
840904 453.,35 10"
840830 454,37 15,300
I) 1'1 .bC:.J. at '10 11\l\
""' .&.J "TJ"V07J!. A71J.LVV
840810 1540 ~ .:\9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------
~ 1.. (cont .. ) cif data col rat curve ana
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'WSEL Flow Discharge
Number a Date Time (ft) (cfs) ( s)
!1ftlo---~~~ ...... ~ ........ --~ ....,"""'_IIMilli!KW_._....,ti'JI8 ____ ~---• ,.. ... ...,....,l'll!ill,.,.. .......................... ......... ..-...... ~ -~N!r.<'rJ/illill>_ ...... .,. ....
112.3X3AC Cross Section 3A 841005 1500 454.21 7,0GO
t 840929 1610 454.21 7,410
840930 1430 454.26 7~500
840916 454 .. 35 8t280
840913 454 9,000
840905 454~63 10,400
112.3S3AC Cross Section JA 841005 1?00 454o51 7,080
Right Bank 840929 1620 454 .. 52 7.410
Sla-09 454~~60 8,280
8409 454 .. 61 8SI280
840905 454.79 10,400
112G3X4B (2.) Cross Section 4 841005 1500 454w81 7,080
(Low Flow) Left 840929 1615 454.82 7,410
840916 451{.98 8,280
840913 1100 455.14 9.000
840905 455 .. 30 10!1400
840905 455 .. 31 10,400
112.3X4B (1) Cross Section 4 840830 456.00 15,300
(Low Flow) Left Bank 840822 1430 456.36 19,100
840810 456.67 24,000
--------------------------------------------------··-----------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
le ~5 (cont .. ) Summary site-specific data collect for rating curve analys
at R • 112.6L.
Staff Gage Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Numbe:r within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
li\!:llllt ..... olll!IIIIIIIQIIICIIIJ&---~-_.,l!blle!W~tlfG!t~c-..r$'itii..-IIILGII,_.U!I;IIi_.lillllt!o...,. ... l!!!li!lall ..............
___ oliii(IJI ______ &ii!LW
~-l'i!iiJbl'd!i!fl'tDM.s:I/Iflliil:!!b' .......... ...,_._.ll!fti6:_CI{III __
112~3S4C Cross Section 4 841005 1500 453,42 7,080
(Low Flow) Right Bank 841005 152i. 453 o41 7:.080
840929 1635 453 e43 7,410
840913 1700 453$11 911000
840904 454.17 10,800
112 .. 3S4B Cross Section 4 840830 455.56 15,300
(High Flow) Right Bank 840822 1330 456 006 19,100
840810 456 0 54 24,000
:Po 112 .. 3X5 Cross Section 5 841005 1500 454 .. 92 7,080
I Left Bank 840930 1320 454 .. 97 1,500 ~
~ 840916 455oll 8,280
840913 1700 455.25 9,000
840904 455.61 10:;800
840830 456 e 56 15,300
840822 1445 457 .1 0 19,100
840810 457.43 24,000
112 .. 385 Cross Section 5 840830 45So56 15,300
Right Bank 840822 1350 456 016 19,100
840810 456.80 24,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e .5 (cont~) Sumttt.~ry of site-specific data collected for rating curve analysis
at a Ill 112 .,,].,.
---~--~~----~~~--~~--~~~~~-~-~~~--~-~~~~-~~-~-------~--~~~-~~-~~~~--~~~----~~---~~-~-------~
---~-~~--------~-~---~-~~~------~-~~~~---~-~---~-~~---~--~~--~---~~-~---~~--~~~~-~-~--~~~---
r ,.... ~ ~ -llj,? ---...___ ! --1!'10!"11~"11' Flow Discharge r uage LOC81:l.OD Wil!!i.U
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
-ll!li!lrlii-&.:DiflMIIt .... Gi!lllli'Millllt'rCiillliJI; ... ..... ~ ....................... ~H<NfJhtiiN-.... ..... -~----tlliif;b----~--8'.11---.----lll!lil'-.... ............................ _.
112.3X6 Cross Section 6 840930 1130 455 .. 13 7,500
Left Bank 840916 455.22 8,280
840913 1700 455.39 9,000
840904 455.80 10,800
840830 456.83 15,300
840822 1510 457 .. 47 19!1100
112 .. 386 Cross Sect 6 84091.3 1700 455 .. 53 9,000
Right Bank 840904 455.91 10,800
)> 840830 456 .. 87 15,300
& 840822 1420 457 .. 49 19,100
840810 457 .. 98 24,000
112 .. 3X7 Cross Section. 7 841012 455.17 215 6,210
Left Bank 840930 1030 455.70 355 1 '500
840916 455.94 8,280
840913 1700 456 .. 19 721 9,000
840904 456.7 9 1430 10,800
840830 2980 15,300
840822 1540 458.70 19,100
840810 459.36 24,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
le A-1.5 (cont.) Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve analysis
at R .. Mo 112.oL.,.
Staff Gage Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
=-----IM:!lil--...... .. ..,_._ __ __. _____ ... ___ ------INI*!t ... oa .. a-_._..__
____ ...., ____
-~----------
112.387 Cross Section 7 841012 215 6,210
Right Bank 840930 355 7,500
840913 456 e47 721 9,000
840904 456 .. 85 1450 10,800
840830 458 013 2980 15,300
840822 1445 458.52 19,100
840810 459931 24,000
ll2 .. 3X8 Cross Section 8 840930 1018 457.59 7,500
Left Bank 840914 1515 458.21 8l'800
840913 1700 458.17 9~000
840904 1109 458.79 10,800
840904 1048 458o80 109800
840822 1625 460.45 19,100
112o3S8 Cross Section 8 841005 1505 458 .. 60 79080
Right Bank 840930 458.66 71)500
840914 1515 458.95 8,800
84091J 1700 458.99 9,000
840904 459o24 10,800
840830 460 .. 01 15,300
~ J.t\0 I), 'o!C:/\1\ J.t:..n "'li!.. 1 n 'II nn
O"'tVO.LL A..JU\1 "'tOVo.:JU .1.7t.I.VV
Staff
Number
I!'Wif&!:!'.Modlllll!iiiiP..,-=aei!!III ... GIII!aaso
114o0Pl
Summary of site-specific data collec
at R ,. 114 .. 1R,.
Location WSEL
within site Date Time (ft)
ll:'fllllt ...... .,..._ ... ____ l' ___ ,.... ..... ..................... ...,. ...... lllll'!t ...
Cross Section 2 841005 1130 468.44
840926 1153 468.39
841001 1447 468.43
840914 1650 468.60
840911 1240 468.87
840823 1200 471.00
840812 471.14
for rating curve analys
Flow Discharge
(cfs) (cfs) ....,. ................. lll!!li:iiJ ....... ....-... .,II'I!II:JI ...
7,080
7,680
7,830
8ji800
9,330
17,900
19,000
Tab
f
Number
tfll':llotlf'!l&rfi!!I!EfGII!l'!lo$'!!1 ... 1ii!li!DI!:till!lll~ll'IIS!t
114.9Pl
)::II
• ..g:,:,. co
!IWitlt;;lsfllM.MI!!llll-~flb!D--I"'aiao!Y'I!IP~-------
Cross Sect 1
of sit
115
cific
Date Time
--~l!!llt--@HIIIIJI!!Io
840926 1300
841001
840914 1540
840911 1145
840920 1120
840816 1353
830526 1830
840823 1425
830720 1305
830715 1330
830611 1930
830613 1155
830612 1830
830803 1245
830805 1435
830806 1933
830824 1530
830808 1134
830825 1115
830826 1755
col lee rat curve ana
WSEL Flow Discharge
(ft) (cfs) (cfs)
~~..._.--~ ~--. .. ~IIIM!IIiil!ii:!!MI .tb!ifll81!lv.t ... -----... -
474e46 7,680
474.41 7,830
474.48 8,800
474o48 9,330
474.52 10,400
475e55 14,500
47 5. 71 16,000
476.23 17,900
476.06 18,600
476.39 18,600
476 .19 19,000
476.35 19,900
476.40 20,000
476.81 21,600
476.7 4 21,700
477.04 23,800
477.31 24,700
477.38 26,000
477 e 58 27,400
478.70 31,700
site-spec data col for rat curve ana
.... 1 8 /II •
Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Number s Time (ft) ( ) ( .... "\ 0,/
G!Dl!llliltil--... -----
_____ ,...,_ _____________ ----8:11 .... _____ ..,..
-----t'llfllllot~j~D-_ll!flm_ ... _._.._,...C!S!Io
18. 1 Cross ion 2 841004 1720 lll 7,380
840930 507., 7,500
840926 507 .61 7,680
840914 507.86 8,800
840914 507.91 8,800
840910 1735 508 o02 9,890
1414 508.16 ,300
1 1300 .94 13,600
840815 1400 "' 151100
840815 1415 509.25 15,100
840823 1645 509. 17 j
840812 1500 509. 19,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table Summary s
at R.,M., 119.
ific data collected for rating curve analysis
----------~---------------------------------------------------------------~-----------------
Staff Gage T "'"_.s!A ...-.:...t-: ..,...._W"Q, 1'.'1l~V"ir Flow Discharge A.IU~Ciii..J..UU Wl)L.I..8
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
·-ti:!:M-!:Iilllllt~~Ka...,. _____ tiiliiii&IIWIIE'JIDflae8BI:!ill ___ &!!a_c:aB • .,-c:ma ..... -------------SIDiltll!!ii_CE!!!I_Sffllfll!ill ----1!1!!8--~--
119. 1 Cross Section 2 841004 509.25 7,380
841004 1645 509.27 7,380
840930 1655 509.27 7,500
840926 1708 509,33 7p680
841001 1000 509.35 7,830
840914 1111 509058 8,800
840910 1810 509.76 9»890
840922 509.94 10~300
840815 511.05 15jl00
840812 511 e8J 19,000
Table
Gage
Number
Clilll!ll_*'$1 _____ ,..._as&t
119.
119.281
of s
at RoM. 119.
.... -~-----llii!IP----.-.~---.......
Mouth
s Sect 1
ific
Date Time
-----~
840928
840906
840922 1523
840819 1045
840812
840824 1029
840914 1330
840906
840906
840922 1 5
840922 1520
5 1805
1 1514
840815
840819 1045
840819 1215
840824 1030
840824 1225
840809
lee ted rating curve analysis
WSEL
(ft) )
flaftt..-. .................. ------\1if!a-..................................
508. 7,320
508. 10,300
508. 10-300
0.19 ,400
0.41 19,000
0 .. 95 22,700
508e58 8,800
508.88 10~300
508.89 10,300
508. 10,
.95 10,300
"' 0 10,400
1111 ,600
509.76 15,100
510.20 317 17,400
0.22 17,400
511.00 22,700
511.11 22~700
511. 24,500
>
I
U1
N
C!!!!:iV..,_I..,. __ t:alilir'~ill*a--
119.
119.
_li!I!Mit ___ ..., ________ ..._ __
s ion 2
ion 3
s
119.
if
_. __ __._....,.,.
841005 0915
4 1330
840906
840922 1500
840905 1730
1 1525
840819 5
840824 1030
840824 1224
841005 0930
4
840906
840922 1500
840905 1700
840831 1526
840815
840819 1430
840824 1112
840824 1145
840824 1220
840809
col for rat curve analys
WSEL
( ) )
------tiilll!f-ll'!!!l!if-~ .........
...... _. ... ____ l!!!lM ___
508~28 7,080
508.,60 8,800
e90 10,300
508.94 10!1300
508 G 0 10,400
509. 13,600
0.26 17,400
a OS ,700
511,. 22,700
508.28 7,
.60 8~800
508.89 1011300
508.95 10,300
508. 0 10,400
509. 71 ,600
509.7 5 15.100
510.27 300 17,400
511 013 22,700
511 e 19 1090 22,
1.24 22,700
! .. 42 jsoo
~~-~-~---~-~~--~~-~--~-----~~~~~~~~--~-~-~~~~~--~-~~---~-~~~~~----~-~~---~-~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~
119.
119~ 5
.10 (cont .. )
s ction 4
as t 5
of s
1
...,...,...,.t#(iili .....
841005
4
840906
81•0922
840905
15
840819
840824
840914
840906
840905
840831
840815
840819
840824
840824
a col rat curve .ana
WSEL
( ) )
.__..,. .. ..,~tl.'lf!!!t~ «""'~-.... --~-... --~ ... ,_..,-~~..,
0945 1t
8,800
• 10,300
1 0 .92 10,300
1645 508. 10,400
509. 15,1
1330 0.75 ,400
1041 1.61 • 700
1330 510. 8,
1.25 10,
1 • ,300
1. .2 10,400
1702 512.10 13,
512. 15,100
1640 512. 3 17.400
1042 513.56 ,700
1229 3.70 ,700
----------------------~---------------------------------------------------------------------
~11
125. 1
1
Summaxy
at R.M. 1
ion
site
............. iftWc ...... ..-1ilbill~~~~=:lj~
Cross tion 1
Cross 2
Time _____ ...,
840929
840930 1
840913
840910
17
1710
1440
841 8 1200
012
840929
840930
840926 1
840915 1150
3 1400
0 1650
840831 1736
84081'•
840819 1700
840822 15
col
_.., ......... ~
555 ..
556.
556.39
556.54
e25
"61
Cl>
.,02
555.
557.
.so
557 II
557 !167
.86
.,
558 012
558.
•
559.
559 .. 69
for
a
169
3
657
curve ana
7 'IJ
7~
9,000
9$1890
13,600
16,100
,400
,100
4,
6.210
7~410
7,500
7,680
8,520
9,000
9,
13,600
16$1
17/1
19.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I> 2 collect rat curve ana
---------------------------------------------------··------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff Location WSEL Flow Discharge
6 e Date Time (ft) ( ) ( s)
~--Ww....-... ~-~~~ Olli!!I .. ~ .......... Uj11fl' ...... _... ........ «ft'$1~ii!Jtl!l ;.-(kiM!~~·---_,__....,.._./tliit!!Jr .. ---------~--,..,. _II!'JL!!Jo.._....,.._.~..-IIM{il ....
129. 1 Cross Sect 2 841001} 1445 605.71 7,380
840927 605.70 7,470
840930 605.70 7,500
840926 1615 605.66 7,680
840915 1015 605 II 74 8,520
840910 1535 605<?86 9,890
840816 606.39 14,500
84081'•· 1550 606 f> 56 16,100
840814 606 .. 57 16,1fl0
840821 45 606.97 19,~00
840821 1745 606.99 19,900
840811 607.63 22,500
840827 1110 608.60 27 j) 700
840826 1556 609.01 31,700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01
O't
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4}13
--.... --I!!IIIWtBSm""*..,...,
111.1
131"1
s e-spec
at R.Mo 131 .3L.
ion
s e
... a. ...... -.-............................
____ .,. __
Cross t on 3 840928
841004
840927
840926
13
840907
2
840814
Cross ct 1 840929
840927
840926
840913
840907
840902
ta. collec curve
.-
Discharge
Time ) ( )
tl);llfth!ll~il·----.................... ..... ,.,. ..... lll'il*ll ..........
6 (I 7~320
1150 6 o26 7.,3
616o25 7YJ470
616.,24 7,680
1700 616fl29 9,000
1830 616~37 10,700
6 o49 11,800
1445 6 o06 ,100
617.,07 ,100
1644 617 ,900
614 7,410
614.,3 7:+470
1405 6 .33 7,6
1730 614o50 9;;000
1830 614096 ,700
615.26 11,800
Table A-1 cific
at-R .. Mu 131
f Gage ion
Number site
-----I!E!!I~IIiii'UtNitlal--
____ Mrl:!l...., _____ llllllm ____ f#laifiii.'ID _____
131 Cross 3 841012
840927
840919
840907
840902
840831
840817
840828
840811
840827
collected
Time (ft)
--------01111*-
616.35
1234 616.
616.
1750 617 .. 13
1720 6 4132
1700 6 !058
617 e 51
1330 618.11
618.18
11 619 .. 38
rating curve analysis
)
2.9
20
57
248
625
(cfs)
6,210
7,470
9,390
10,700
11,800
13,600
14,800
21,000
22,500
27 J 700
le
Staff
~fii'B-G!DkGNil ...... _OIIilif....,
132. 1
132.
Summary of s e-specific
at R.M .. 132
Locat
with s e Date
l\l,Uiilo--i&'liD(IQ!al-tl!lllillfil!lllllli!IINlil'alllJtJIM&;IIICl4ll!l!tli(llllii--
___ _._NW_
Cross ct 1 840907
840901
840708
840707
840711
840827
Cross ion 2 840914
840907
840907
840901
840828
840708
840707
840711
840827
840827
Cross Section 3
840708
840707
840711
1010
1146
1250
1700
1500
1
10
1500
1051
1206
1415
1700
1
col rat curve analys
WSEL Discharge
(ft) (cfs) (c.fs)
----lillltietlilllillliiiiii!B--L"lQ\11-------......... _____ 4;1lbo_. _
625o 10,700
625. 12,700
626 .09 ,000
.. 05 1 21,500
626 ~ 15 21,900
626.23 23 "100
627 co27 27,700
625a33 8,800
625~49 10,700
625.50 10,700
So65 12,700
626.27 21,000
626 .. 28 146 21$500
626.34 21,900
626.41 23,100
627.29 27,700
627 .. 31 27,700
625 .. 94 10 10-,700
626.28 12,700
1316 219000
627.29 170 21,500
627 .. 14 2ll)900
627 .39 23,100
~~~~~~---~~~-~~~~~-~~-~--~~~~~-~~~-~~--~-~~-~---~-~~---~--~-~--~~~-~-----~~--~~~--~--~~-~---
Table .15 (cont.) Summary site-specific data collected for. rating curve analysis
at R.M. 132.61.
Staff Gage Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
--lli!llllbo~lltilll'II'-..U.filltillillltii>C!I8JQii!llll" --aa.--.Cfii!III-....... --.... -Cllllll'-.......... _,. ... ~ _..,. ..... .,. _ __.me _____ .__ _________ ..., ___
132QSS4 Cross Section 4 840907 1415 627.08 10,700
840901 1112 627.23 26 12,700
840828 1154 627.86 21,000
840708 1445 627.95 150 21,500
840707 1700 627 G 96 21,900
840711 1505 628.05 23 b 100
81~0821 1149 628.47 27 '700
132.585 Cross Section 5 840914 1335 626.90 8,800
840907 1400 627.17 10,700
)::» 840907 627.19 10,700 s
(J"1 840901 1127 627 .41 27 12.700 1..0
840828 1156 628.06 21,000
840708 1600 628.10 136 21,500
840707 1700 628 .. 14 21,900
840711 1510 "23 23,100
840827 1150 628.67 27 J 700
840827 1154 628.68 27 J 700
132 .. 5SE Cross Section 6 840907 627 .18 10,700
840907 1330 627.19 10,700
840901 1146 627.43 27 12; 700
840901 1003 627.44 27 12,700
840828 1158 628 .. 09 21,000
840708 1635 628 .16 120 21,500
840707 1635 628 .16 21,900
840711 1510 628.27 23 J 100
840827 1153 628.71 27,700
-~~--~~~-~~-~~~--~--~-~~-~--~~~------~~~~-~~~-------~-~~---~-~~~~~-~--------~-~~-~~-~-~~--~--
~--~~---~~-~----~~~--~--~~-~-~~--~~~--~-~-~-~~--~~~-~~---~~~-~~-~-~~--~~~~-~~--~~~~-~--~~~~~
Table .15 (cont.) Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve analysis
at RoM. 132.oL.
~-----~---------~~------------~--~------------~--~---~--~~--~-~~-~-------~---~-----~-----~~~
~~--~~-~~-~~-~~-~---~------~---~-----~-~---~-~-~------~--~~~--~--------~~~~--------~~-~---~-
Staff Gage Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
ai!III--UJIIIG!ISCIIIII __ ._.._ --------ll!lllllruii ....... I!!IID .... Iillilal------------~~~~~~~~~~llllllllllr--(Jl§Jll!illl!lflllliiiiiiiZi!illrc;!ll!llllli!!a-...............................
132 .. 587 Cross Section 1 840914 1345 626 0 91 8,800
840907 627 016 10,700
840907 1300 627ol7 10,700
840901 1204 627()43 24 12,700
840901 1001 627944 24 12~700
840828 1200 628oll 21~000
840708 1700 628.17 136 211)500
840707 628.20 211)900
840711 1515 628o30 23 '100
)> 840827 1156 628 0 74 27 '700
I
(.1'!
0 132.588 Cross Section 8 840914 1345 627()00 8!t800
840907 627.21 10,700
840901 1000 627 e 50 33 12,700
840901 627.51 33 12,700
840828 1202 628.17 21,000
840708 1740 628.20 129 21,500
840707 628.24 21,900
840711 1515 628.33 23 :e 100
840827 1158 628.83 27,700
132 .. 5S9 Cross Section 9 840914 1400 627~92 8J800
840907 1200 628.04 10»700
840901 0958 628.10 22 1251700
840901 1245 628 (D 12 22 12~700
840828 1204 628o33 21~000
840708 1800 628o40 149 21,500
840707 1700 628e37 21»900
840711 1515 628o47 23 '100
840827 1200 628.,84 21 s 700
Table A-1 .. 16 Summary of site-specific data collected for rating rurve analysis
at R .. M .. 1
Staff Gage Location WSEL Flow Discharge
Number within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
______ ..._ ............ lllllcaJ ..................... a!l!l~-----..... ----................... ,.. ................ ....... .&!D!IIIO:. .... __ CIDIBZfil!lPIJ~IIIIli!IBI!Ilt---=!JJ
133.7Pl Cross Section 3 840926 1215 6491)23 1 j680
840925 1735 649.26 7,890
840911 17 55 649.42 9,330
840919 1605 649.46 9,390
840910 1505 649.45 9,890
840910 1830 649.47 9,890
840922 1555 649.52 10,300
840920 1720 649.57 10,400
840814 650.27 16,100
840814 1150 650.32 16,100
840821 1530 650.71 19,100
"' 840828 1542 650 0 7 2 2lll000
;..-! 840824 1550 651 .. 43 22,700
840827 1245 651.84 27,700
840827 1245 651.86 21 J 700
840827 1030 651.98 27,700
840825 1425 652 .. 48 29,800
840826 652.72 31,700
~
I en
N
Table ~17
Staff Gage
Number
-li!IWtiH.IJMEtllii!C!ai!D--i!BIIIII-...,
136 .. 0Sl
136.082
l36 .. 0S3
Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve analys
at R.Mo 136.0L.
Location WSEL Flow Discharge
within site Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
------~-----illlllll .......... ,.. ........ ti!1B .. IIlli*!'SIIIii1til Cil!lilURMIRiiflltJHIIWIDta!li!IIOIII~
__ II'J!Mil _____
.-..----------
Cross Section 1 840909 1113 674 .. 64 76 10,600
840901 1605 675.14 150 12,700
840818 1100 675 .. 81 246 15,600
840818 1100 675 .. 85 15ll600
840828 1724 676.67 21,000
840827 1604 678.06 27 J 700
Cross Section 2 840915 1745 674.49 8,520
840914 1100 674.56 8,800
840909 674.84 10,600
840909 1155 674.88 80 10,600
840908 674.92 10,900
840901 1710 675.31 162 12,700
840818 1130 675.,97 281 15,600
840828 1725 676.78 21,000
840827 1603 678 .. 04 27!) 700
Cross Section 3 840915 1520 8,520
840914 1130 675of'~ 8,800
840909 1228 675e3l 79 101'600
840909 675.32 10,;600
840908 675.36 10,900
840901 17 50 675.,'77 149 12,700
840818 1145 676o39 241 15,600
840828 1610 676$99 413 21,000
840827 1608 678.21 27 » 700
--~~-~-~~-~~-~-~~~~~~-~-~~~~~--~----------------~-~--~~--------~~---~~~~-~~---~--~~~~~-~~-~-
le (cont .. ) cific co lected rating curve analys
at R.M ..
f Gs:tO'P --o-WSEL Discharge
Number Date Time (ft) ) (cfs) __ _._.,.. .................. .. .... _____ ...,.__ .................... ------__ ._.._II!IJ!!b<_dl!e_
lllliiiiiiJ ............... ----~-----...... --
136.0S4 Cross 4 841003 1645 675.03 1,680
840915 45 675.15 8,520
840914 1145 675.21 8,800
840909 675.48 ,600
840909 1340 675.61 ,600
5.61 10,900
840901 5.82 154 12,700
840818 676.65 253 15,600
840828 677.36 413 21,000
840811 677.56 24,500
840827 678o54 27,700
840827 678. 27,700
1 .. oss Cross tion 5 840915 1745 .. 04 81'520
840914 1200 676.05 8,800
840909 676 .. 33 10,600
840909 1405 676 .. 43 79 10,600
840908 676eJ8 10,900
840901 1830 676.61 153 12»700
840818 1330 677 .. 10 273 15,600
840828 1700 677.62 21,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------~--------------------
Table .17 ('cont.) Summary of site-specific data collected for rating curve analysis
at R.M. 136 100L.
f Gage Location
Number within site Date Time
-------K:I'tll----ll!lll!Jio .............. ~ ....... --.-----lillll' ....,..,.._.,...,_ua
136.0S6 Cross Section 6 840915 1745
840914 1215
840909 1440
840909
840909 1440
840908
840901 1900
840818 1400
840828 1730
840827 1617
WSEL
(ft)
_____ i:lillU ___
676a30
676.35
676.63
676.64
676.67
676.78
676,.97
677 0 53
677.96
678 .. 91
Flow
(cfs)
84
154
288
Discharge
(cfs)
8,520
8,800
10,600
10,600
10,600
10,900
12,700
15t600
21,000
27,700
.. 18 for rat curve ana
WSEL Discharge
Time ( ) ) ( )
lt!Mll ................ ~ ......... ~ ...,_...,.,. ...... .,._ ... .,. ... ~ ....... llll!li'li
r:r:wt ___ ...__ ...................... ____ ._. ___
..., .................... ~ ....
137 .. 1 Cross ct 1 • 7,320
840929 1540 690.02 7,410
841003 690.02 1,680
840914 1230 690.05 8,800
840910 1335 690.02 9,890
84090~ 690.22 11,800
12 1630 692 02 19,000
12 1630 .13 19,000
840821 1509 .19 19,900
840828 1749 692 ~ 15 21,000
840828 692.17 21,000
Ol 840827 693 .. 27) 700
U1 840826 695.16 31,700
.4P2 sa Sect 2 690 .. 71 7,320
840929 1540 690.64 7,410
841003 1600 690.70 7.680
8409 1230 690.71 8,800
840910 5 690 .. 76 9t890
840812 1630 692.01 19,000
840812 1650 692.02 19,000
840821 1508 692.19 19,900
at R.M ..
of
1
cific col rat curve analys
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Cross t 2
Date
0
840920
840902
840816
15
840823
840812
840812
840821
25
1642
1535
1500
1230
1 2
WSEL
(ft)
706 ~
.55
.25
707 u40
707.77
708306
708*'10
708,
)
charge
(cfa)
9,
,400
11,
14t500
15»100
,900
19.000
19,000
19.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
col ct rat curve ana
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e
.-~.,_.,,..,...,..
1 2 S40910
840920
840902
8408 6 1430
1218
1410
1 7
(ft)
.. ..,..~iilllfilwlllll'I!W-
708.
?08.
708.99
709 •
• 96
7 .. 31
710.33
710~31
712.62
)
WfJ ................. (IJM)i ..
9,S90
10
' 19,000
19,000
21,000
31,700
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------·-----------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
le .. 21 a c ic collect rat curve analys
1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WSEL Flow Discharge
(ft) (cfs) (cfs)
... ~ ... ~ll!\lmi'I~~~Gd~ 111!W981i18j;l~-..~lll!ilftol'f:\!fiiNPII .. ~tii!Mill-.. ~~¥tiiM ~--if;h'Pi/ii~Wt~ .... ....... l!e!!IP.,.,.~~ rr.w..-... ..-~----t!18!111«1'lwfll\II!MIIP..-.. ~-----
139., 1 SB ction 2 840929 1610 712~63 7.410
841003 1310 712a72 7t680
840918 1707 712 .. 83 8,370
640910 1300 712o89 9,890
840902 713.,38 11,800
840816 1512 713.64 14,500
840823 1100 714.00 17 J 900
840812 15l•5 714 .. 18 19,000
840821 1458 714.38 19,900
of s cific collected for rating curve analysis
.. 147 .. &L.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location WSEL Flow Discharge
thin s e Date Time (ft) (cfs) (cfs)
M.ll'a-lilll!ilo>etoN!!!?$1'~ ... --...... ~~ ............. 19!Si'""""' ......... I!Miflfllltrg...,.,~ ft!!!!9~1!!1!2!'~ii!!!!Sce=t ..,.,.. ......... ~ .... --....., __ _.._ ... _
..... o!llilllir .... elWd!lliti!IJ-*CII'Jil>e!llliil~
147 0 Cross Section 1 840917 812.25 8,130
840913 0930 812.50 9,000
840907 1312 812 .. 90 10,700
840829 1600 814.08 17,400
840813 814.33 19,000
840828 1910 814.5) 19,000 *
840821 1150 814 .. 7 5 20s000 *
147 .. 0M2 Cross Section 2 840917 813 .. 54 8,130
840913 '0930 813 .. 87 9,000
m 840829 1600 8l5e25 17,400
1.0 840813 815.36 17,600
81,.0828 1922 815.63 19,000 *
840821 1210 815 .. 77 20,000 *
147 .. 0M3 Cross Section 3 840917 814 .. 67 8,130
840913 0930 814 .. 92 9,000
840907 1250 815 .. 19 10,700
840829 1600 816~~24 17,400
840813 816.34 17,600
840828 1940 816.59 19,000 *
840821 1225 816 .74 20,000 *
~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---~-~~~--~~~--~--~~~~~~~~-~~~~-~~~-~~---~~-~-~~~-~-~-~~-~~~--~~~~~~~-~~~
* Instantaneous discharge estimated from time lag analysis.
(cont.) if col lee rat curve analys
Discharge
Date (ft) (cfs) ( )
l!l!l1lli'~lallill> ............... _.,.. _____ atllll'..,.....,tllii& ...... ~tlillllllll ..... fllilt4 .......
_______ ...
_ ......... o:illi:AI ... _.
............. ____ .,._._ ........... ~GI\IIIo--
Cross Section 4 840917 815.12 1860 8,130
840913 0930 815. 2236 9,000
840907 1233 815.72 10,700
840829 1600 816.69 40 17,400
840813 6. ,600
840828 1950 817 09 19,000 *
840821 1 5 817. 20!1000 *
8407 1230 817 o46 21,400
s 5 840917 815o 8,130
840913 0930 815.80 9,000
840907 1 816.13 10,700
840829 1600 817.20 17~400
840813 817.44 17,600
840828 2000 817"61 19,000 *
840821 1247 817 f> 76 20,000 *
147"0M6 Cross Section 6 840917 8l6olJ 8,130
840913 0930 816.38 9;000
840829 1600 818.00 17,400
840813 818.18 17,600
840821 1 s. 20,000 *
* tantaneous discharge estimated from time lag analya
SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC CONDITIONS
AND HABITAT FORECASTS AT
1984 MIDDLE RIVER STUDY SITES
DRAFT REPORT
Appendix B
Data supporting calibration and application
of IFG hydraulic models
Prepared for:
ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY
Prepared by:
N. Diane Hilliard
Shelley Williams
E .. Woody Tri hey
R. Curt Wilkinson
Cleveland R. Steward, III
May 1985
Figure 8-1.1
Figure B-1.2
Figure B-1.3
Figure B-2.1
gure .2
Figure B-2.3
Figure B-2.4
gure .5
Fi re B-2.6
gure B-2.7
re .8
Figure B-2~9
gure B-2.10
Fi re 2.11
APPENDIX FIGURES
Streambed profile at site 101.2R-main channel.
Streambed profile at site 101.2R-left channel.
Streambed profile at site 101.2R-right channel.
Scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and velocities
from the calibrated IFG-4 hydraulic model at 101.2R.
Comparison of observed velocities and velocities predicted
by low flow IFG-2 model at si 101. , cross section 5.
Compa son of observed ocities and velocities predicted
by high flow IFG-2 model at si 101.5L, cross section 5.
Comparison of observed velocities and velocities predicted
low flow IFG-2 model at site 1 .6L, cross section 7.
Comparison of observed velocities and velocities predicted
by high flow IFG-2 model at site 112.6L, cross section 7.
Comparison observed velocities and predicted IFG-2 model
at site 119.2R, cross on 3.
Scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and veloci es
from the calibrated IFG-4 hydraulic model at 131.7L.
Comparison observed oci es and velocities predi
by high flow I model at site 132.6L, cross section
Campa son observed velocities and veloci es predicted
by high flow IFG-2 model si 136.0L, cross section
Comparison of observed vel ties and velocities predicted
low ow IFG-2 model at site .ll, cross on 2.
Compa son of observed ocities and veloci
high ow IFG-2 model at site 147.1L, cross
predi
ion 2.
Table B-1.1 ..
Table B-1 .. 2 ..
Table B-1.3 ..
Table B-2.1.
Table B-2 .. 2.
Table B-2.3.
Table B-2 .. 4 ..
Table B-2 .. 5.
Table B-2.6 ..
Table B-2.7.
Table B-2 .. 8 ..
Table B-3 .. 1.
Table B-3c2 ..
Table B-3 .. 3 ..
Table B-3.4~
Table B-4 .. 1 ..
Table B-4 .. 2 ..
e "3.,
APPENDIX TABLES
Streambed profile at site 101.2R-main channel.
Streambed profile at site 101 .. 2R-left channel.
Streambed profile at site 101.2R-right channel.
Cross section elevationst substrate and cover data at site
101.5R.
Cross section elevations, substrate and cove1r data at site
101.2Lo
Cross section elevations, substrate and cover data at site
112 .. 6L ..
Cross section elevations, substrate and cove1r data at site
119 .. 2R ..
Cross section elevations, substrate and cove1r data at site
131.7L ..
Cross section elevations, substrate and cover data at site
132.6L.
Cross section elevations, substrate and cover data at site
136 .. 0L.
Cross section elevations, substrate and cover data at site
147all.,
IFG-4 calibration velocities (ft/sec) at site 101.2R.
IFG-4 calibration velocities (ft/sec) at site 131.7L.
IFG-4 calibration velocities (ft/sec) at site 132.6L.
IFG-·4 calibration velocities (ft/sec) at site 136.0L.
Comparison between observed and predicted water surface
elevations, discharges, and velocities for site 101.2R
hydraulic model ..
Comparison between observed and predict'd water surface
elevations, discharges, and velocities for site 131.7L
hydraulic model ..
Comparison between observed and predicted water surface
elevations, discharges~ and velocities for site 132e6L
hydraulic model.
le B-4.4.
Table
e B-6.1 ..
Table B-6.2 ..
Table 8-6 .. 3.
Table .. 5 ..
Table .. 6.
e .7.
e .. 8 ..
Comparison between observed and predicted wa su
evations, discharges, and velocities for te 136.0L
hydraulic model.
Statistics evaluating predictive capability of IFG-4
hydraulic models ..
~1ainstem discharge, site flow and water surface elevation
(WSEL), wetted {gross) surface area and juvenile chi
usable area (WUA) forecast for the site at 101e2R.
Mainstem dischar9e, site flow and water surface elevation
(WSEL), wetted (gross) surface area and juveni 1 e chi nook
usable area (WUA) forecast for the si at 101~5L.
instem dischar~e, site ow and water surface elevation
(WSEL), wetted (gross) surface area and juvenile chinook
usable area (WUA) forecast for the site at 112~6L.
ins tern di scha rae, site ow and water surf ace e 1
(WSEL), wetted (gross) surface area juveni 1 e
usable area {WUA) foreca for si at 1 ~2R~
instem discharge, site flow and water surface e1
(WSEL), wetted (gross) surface area and j uveni 1 e
usable area (WUA) forecast for site 131.7L.
Mainstem schar9e, si flow and water surface el
(WSEL), wetted (gross) su area and juvenile
usable area {WUA) forecast for the site 132.
Mainstem schar~e, si flow and water surface elevation
(WSEL) wetted (gross) surface area and j 1 e nook
e area (WUA) forecast r the site 136~
schar9e, si flow and water surface evation
) , {gross) su area and juveni 1 e chi
1e area ( ) forecast the site 147.
359 ...
358
357
Cross
section 1
Figure B-1.1
&
101.2R l\t1ain Channel
STREAMBED STATtON (FT.)
101.258
--Surveyed WSEl
Cross
section a
on September 24M25, 1984
Streambed
Cross
section 9
Streambed profile at site 101.2R-main channel.
nc"'"lvt~:~cu & WATER SURFACE PROFILE
101.2R Lett Channel
'~''""'"'""'"' WS£l
ser::,terrlber 24·25, 1984
Q;{J(I
SHUlAMIJIW S rATit)N (FT)
Fi B , • 2 Streambed profile at site
101. left channel.
Fi
na:::.A~.t.m!l;;,cu & WATER SURfACE PROFILE
101.2R Right Channel
STREAMat;O STATION (FT.)
Streambed
101.2H -r
ile at site
chan'1Pl ..
Table
Streambed
on
3
5
le
' 1
WSEL
ID:
surveyed
) 0
e B-.2 ..
358$
3
363 ..
si
(
Cross
Cross
converges
n
on 3 -SG
section 4 -
on 6 ,..
.(.
le 1.3. Streambed profile at site 101.2R right channel; su
on August 24-25, 1984 (TBM IO: R&M LRX-6 LB 1980).
Streambed
Station
Streambed
Elevation WSEL
Cross section 1
359.92 DRY Cross section 2 -SG 101 2S2
2+29 359.88
1 .. 08 DRY Cross section 3·
.. 52
362 .. 15 DRY
362 .. 17 Cross section 4
1 362 .. 05 Cross section 5 -101 .. 255,
Pool
362. DRY
362
362.33
o.ll verges from main
channel
5
le s section evations~ trate and
cover data at site .2R.
ion Elev
te (ft) Cov s
___ ....,.,.,.....,.>';lilllllli.""""" ...... --. _....,.......,.....,._ '""""""---~-
____ ...,... ...............
0 .. 0 1 8~4 LB
2 0 1 8 4
8s0 7 4.3
.,6 7 4 ..
0 7 3
0 4o3
4~3
4 .. 3
4 .. 3
7 4
7 4 3 LWE
3
i 4 3
4$3
7 4.,3
7 4~3
7 4.,3
7
~0
<• 0
,.0 7
.,0 7
.. 0
0 7
.. 0 7
7
7
7
7 ..,
I
4Q3
4.,3
4.3 RWE
7 4 .. 3 ., .. 3 §
4
4 .. 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
le B-·2 .. 1 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 101.2R.
Hor Bed
ic1n Dist Elev
Site (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
tililli\l!, ______ ,..,...,... __
-.-. ... --_....,.. ____ --------
ion 1 .0 360 .. 70 7 4 .. 3
Station 0+00 .. 0 360 .. 60 4 .. 3
.. ) .o 360.70 7 4 .. 2
.. 0 .. 70 7 4 .. 2
.o 360 .. 90 7 4 .. 2
94.0 361 .. 00 7 4 .. 2
96 .. 0 361.10 7 4.2
.. 0 1 .. 10 7 4.2
124 .. 0 361 .. 80 2 .. 2
.0 1 .. 2 4 .. 2
.. 0 362 • 10 8.1
249,.5 361.60 8 .. 1
.0 361 .. 10 10 5 .. 2
274 .. 0 360.90 5 .. 2
.. 0 360 .. 90 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 360 .. 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.0 5 .. 2 LWE
.. 0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 .. 10 10 5 .. 2
.0 .20 5 .. 2
.. 0 360 .. 20 10 5.2
302 .. 0 360 .. 30 10 5@2
.. 0 360 .. 30 5 .. 2
308.0 10 5,.2 RWE
310.0 360 .. 5,.2
314.0 c70 10 5 .. 2
.0 360.90 10 5 2
.. 0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 5e
0 1 5 .. 2 Bottom of
350.0 1 5 .. 2
.0 1 8 .. 3 RB Headpin
ss c:; ..... a.~~eCt..LOn 2 7 5.2 Top of LB stake
Stati 7 5.2
8 5~2
5 .. 2
1 '') ..,
1 .. 3
8 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
e B-2.\ (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 101.2R.
Hor Sed
Dist Elev
te (ft) (ft) Sub s ___ ..._._..,.~-----
_ ,.... ___ ____ ...., _ ,.... _____ ._._
s 0.0 366 .. 1 8 .. 4 Headpin
5 .. 0 365 .. 1 2 .. 1 Top of
.. o .362.20 1 1.,1
.. 0 362 .. 20 1 L~ 1
~0 "' 1 1 1
.. 0 1 1~1
.. 0 1 1,1
.o 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 362, 1 1.,1
40 .. 0 362 .. 00 1 1 .. 1
,.Q 362.,10 1 L. 1
.. 0 362 .. 1 1.,1 .II.
to ,00 1 1 .. 1
49.,0 1 1 .. 1
0 .. 60 1 1~1
.. o 362.70 1 1.1
,0 362 .. 9 .. 2
• o 363 • 8 5~2
.. 5 3 5.3
90 .. 0 362o30 8 5.,3
.. 0 8 5.,3
.. 0 362 .. 8 5 3
100.0 8 5 .. 3
1 .. 0 8 5 3
.. 0 361 .. 8 5,3
.,Q 361 .. 8 5~3
1 .. o 361 .. 8 5 .. 2
118"0 l.lrO 8 5.2
361.. 8 5 .. 2
361 .. 8 5 ..
361 .. 10 8 5 ..
360 .. 8 ,2
1 .. 8 5 .. 2
8 5"2
8 5.2
8 5 .. 2
8 5.,2
8 5 2
8 5 .. 2
8 5.2
8 5®
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-
e .,) section e and
cover a at
l.
Site
_.....,..~,_.,-~----------.,..,._, ___ .....,_ --------
144.0 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 2
.. 0 8 5
8 5 .. 2
,.0 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 8 5
0 8 5 ..
.. 0 8 5 2
.. 0 5 2
0 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 2
0 8 5 .. 2
.. o 8 5.,2
·o 8 2
,.0 8 5 ..
5 .. 2
8 5 2
5
8 5 .. 2
5 2
8 5 2
8 5 ..
8 2
8 5 "" -
8 5.2
5.
8
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table
te
section e"'.ta
cover data at site
2
1 9 .. 4
9 .. 4
8 .. 3
1 2"
10 5 .. 3
5
8
5~2
5,.3
5 .. 3
5 3
10 5.3
5 .. 3
5 3
10 5.3
5 ..
5 3
5 3
5.3
8 5~3
8 5.3
5.3
8 5 .. 3
8 5,
8 5 3
5 3
5 3
7 .3
7 5 ..
5 .. 3
10 5 3
5.
5 3
5~
10 5 .. 3
1 5 3
5e
10 ~ 3
e
-------------------------------------------------------------------
0
.. 1 .. ) section
cover data at
5 .. 3
*3
5 3
5 3
5.3
5 3
5.,3
5.,3
5 .. 3
5 3
5
5,3
5 3
10 5 .. 3
10 5c3
5 3
5 3
6.,
6 .. 3
3
tra.te and
------~-------------------------------------------------------------
le
on
Site
.) s section e evat
cover site
96 .. 0
1
1
1
5 2
5.2
5"
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 3
3
10 5 ..
.. 3
3
.3
5.3
5.3
10 5 3
e
bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------
le .. I .) s s 1on 1ons, trate
cover data at site lOlo
ion ev
Site (ft) ....,.. _______ ... ___ _....,_..,.._ ------____ ....,.. __ '_
0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 8 5~3
.0 5 3
.. 0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 a 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 ..
<( ..,
.0 5~3
0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 8 5 ..
. 0 8 5 .. 3
.o 8 5~
~0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 8 s
.. 0 B . "3
.. 0 5"3
.. 0 8 5,.3
.. 0 8 5 3
5 3
8 5 3
8 5 3
8 5.3
8 5 .. 3
8 5 .. 3
5 .. 3
8 5 ""' ..)
362 .. 10 8 5 3
5.
8 5 .. 3
8 5~3
5 3
8 5 3
8 5
8
10
-------------------------------------------------------------------
le .) section el ions, trate
cover data at site 1 .2R.
ion Elev
s· l (ft) _...,., __________ -------:w---~
__..,.. _______
s 362 .. 5 .. 2
256~0 363,.00 10 S.2
.. 0 7,.2
.. 0 7.2
0 7.,2
.0 10 7.,2
2 9o3
8~4
1 ,.4 Headp
Sec l 0 .. 0 1 5.1 LB
5 2
5~2
5 .. 2
10 5~2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
.,2
2
5 2
5 "") ,t. LWE
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 2
10 5 ..
5~2
5 .,
""'
5
5 ·~ ~2
10 5
5 .. 2
5
5"2
5 2
5,.
5
------------------------------------------------------------------
8-
e ·' .) e
cover data
ion Elev
te (ft) Cov s
____ 'MlQIIII __ ,... ____
-~....,--
_..._...,..._~_ _ __ ......,.. ____
7 .. 0 5 .. 2
0 5<>2
141 .. 0 5.2
.. 0 10 5 2
0 5.2
.0 5.2
1. 0 5.2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
158 .. 0 10 5.2
160.0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5 .. 2
.o 5.2
.. 0 5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
1r1 5 .. 2
0 5 .. 2
184 .. 0 5 .. 2
188 .. 0 5.,2
190.0 10 5 .. 2
.0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5 2
0 10 5.2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 5.2
202 .. 0 5 .. 2
203 .. 0 2 5 .. 2
204 .. 0 2 5.,2
.. 0 2 5 .. 2
.. 0 2 5 ..
0 2 5 .. 2
.. 0 363 .. 2 5 .. 2
.. 0 363 .. 2 5 .. 2
.. 0 363. 2 5.2
.. 0 2 5 .. 1
... 5 .. 40 1 9.4 Bottom of cut bank
.. 0 1 8.4 Top
.. 0 1 8 ..
~~~~~~-~~~--~~~~~-~~--~~~~-~~~~~~~~~--~~----~~--~~~~---~~-~~-----~--
15
Table .) section ions, e
cover data at site 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
.. I .) tra.te
cover
_...,.. ___ ....., ___ ..,.....__
.-.~---
____ ._,4101Jlt
-*'--~----.........
~0 11 5 .. 1
.. 0 11 5 .. 1
148.0 360.50 1 5.1
.o 11 5 .. 1
cO 11 5.1
.. o .. 11 5 .. 1
.. 0 11 5 .. 1
.. 0 11 5 .. 1
172.0 11 5.1
176 .. 0 11 s 1
.. 0 11 5 .. 1
.. 0 5 .. 1 RWE
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 5.2
.o 5 .. 2
.. 0 12 5 .. 2
196 .. 0 5.2
.. 5 12 5 .. 1
.. 5 1 9 .. 4 .o 1 8 .. 4 RB
s 0 .. 0 5 .. 2 LB
.. 5 12 Se3
36 .. 5 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
44.0 363. 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5.3
.. 0 12 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. o .. 10 12 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3 ,o 5 .. 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
e .. J {cont .. ) section trate
cover
. Elev
e (ft) Cov
_.,... ____ ..,..."lliWl ..................
__ ._ __
....,._ .... _...,.. _ _....,. ___ . ___
100.0 5 .. 3
.0 5.3
108 .. 0 5 .. 3
1 .o 5 .. 3
1 .. 0 5.3
1 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
"0 !Ll
.5 5 .. 3
.. 0 5 .. 3
132 .. 0 5 .. 3
136.0 5 3
.. 0 5 3
.. 0 5.,3
.. o 5.,3
.. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 5.,3
156 .. 0 5 .. 3
.. 0 10 5 .. 3
160.,0 5 .. 3
.. 0 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 1.0 5 .. 3
.. 0 10 5.3
.. o 5.,3
.. 0 5 .. 3
1 .. 0 5.,3
182 .. 0 5.,3
.o 5 .. 3
.. 0 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 10 5 .. 3
0 10 5 .. 3
.. 4 364 .. 5 .. 3
.. 0 364 .. 4.,2
212 .. 0 366 .. 1 9 .. 4
215 .. 0 .30 1 8 .. 4
216 .. 5 1 .. 50 1 8 .. 4 RB 1n
--------~----------~~-----~----------------------------------------
.. 12,
B-1
section el , subs e
cover a at si
ion t
te (ft) Sub Comments
....,. ... .....,~ .... ..._-~ ..... ,...~ -----___ ..,..,...._ _...,....._,..._ ...........
1 (" .. 0 .. 60 1 8 .. 2 LB
.so 1 8.2
0 1 8 .. 2 .o 361 .. 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 7 5 .. 2
.. 0 7 5 .. 2
.. 0 7 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
297 .. 0 7 5 .. 2
.. 0 7 5 .. 2
307 .. 0 7 5 .. 2
3 .. 0 7 5.2
.. o 364 .. 1 8 .. 1
1 .. 0 ., 8.1 J.
.. 0 1 8 .. 1 RB Headpin
0.0 1 8 .. 2 LB
12 .. 0 .. 90 1 8 .. Top
60 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 362 .. 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 360. 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 360 .. 5 .. 2
1 .. 0 361 .. 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 .. 10 5 .. 2
325 .. 0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5 .. 2 RWE
425 .. 0 .. 90 8 4 .. 1
.. 0 .80 1 8.1
.. 0 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 6 .. 2
.. 0 6 ..
.. 0 10 5.2
.. 0 5 .. 2
136.0 5.,2
156 .. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B-2.2 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 101 .. 5L~
Bed
Elev Location
thin Site
Hor
Dist
(ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
s Section 3*
Station 19+16
(eont .. )
Cross Section 4*
Station 24+47
Cross Section 5
Station 31+08
206 .. 0
~~46. 0
276.0
306.0
416 .. 0
417 .. 0
0.0
21 .. 0
.. 0
.0
108 .. 0
128.0
158.0
188.0
218.0
.. 0
278 .. 0
338.0
413 .. 0
461 .. 0
466 .. 0
0 .. 0
24 .. 0
74.0
103.0
14U .. O
165 .. 0
.. 0
344 .. 0
399 .. 0
430 .. 0
463 .. 0
466 .. 0
360 .. 90
.. 30
363 ..
364 .. 80
366.6G
368e00
369e80
367 .. 50
364 .. 50
361 .. 40
361 .. 30
J6lo90
360.90
362 .. 40
362 .. 90
363 .. 40
363 .. 40
364 .. 50
364 .. 70
365o90
368 .. 10
372.40
369.90
365 .. 70
364 .. 80
364.20
361+ .. 10
361 .. 40
364 .. 00
365 .. 60
368,~ 60
369.70
370 .. 50
Date of survey: Oct. 2, 1984.
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
12
10
10
10
10
10
8
1
1
s .. .;:
8.,2
8 .. 2
6o2
5o2
5.,2
5 .. 2
5o2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.,2
5 .. 2
4 .. 1
4., 1
4 .. 1
8 .. 1
8 .. 2
8 .. 2
8 .. 2
6 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5c2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
4 .. 1
Sol
8 .. 1
Next to HP
RB Headp1in
LB Headp1in
LB Head:pin
RWE
RB Headpin
erence elevation: R&M Alcap 101.2Wl LB 198~~
* s section not but ermined from discharge
B-
e .. 3 Cross section el~~ations, substrate and
cover at s~~e 1 L.
Location st ev
Within Site (ft) (ft} Sub Cov Comments
__ ..,......,_<!illliJ'Iiil!ilt1llllili!IP ............ .... -. ............... ..... .......... ...., ..... ..... .................. __
ion 1 0 .. 0 .. 36 1 1 .. 1 Headpin.
ion 0+00 1 .. 0 1 1 .. 1
10 .. 0 453 .. 1 1.1
11.0 453. 8 5 .. 1
.. 0 .. 10 8 5 .. 1
.0 1 .. 46 9 5.2 .o 451 .. 50 9 5.2
60 0 451. 9 5 .. 2
63.0 451 .. 9 5 .. 2
sO 1.10 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 450 • 9 5 .. 2
97.0 449 .. 9 5 .. 2
100 .. 0 449. 9 5 .. 2
1 .. 0 .91 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 70 9 5 .. 3
. o 448 .. 9 5.3
sO 447 .. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 70 9 5 .. 3
.. o .30 9 5 .. 3
200 .. 0 9 593
202.0 .. 71 11 5 .. 3
230 .. 0 450. 9 5 .. 2
260 .. 0 .. 30 9 5 .. 2
.,0 .. 32 7 4.1
.. 0 7 4 .. 2
,0 449. 3 1.1
.. 0 3 1 1
.0 4>74 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5.2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 .. 34 8 5 .. 2
.0 8 5.2
.. 0 .. 04 9 5 .. 2
. 0 449 • 9 5 .. 2
462 .. 5 450 .. 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 .. 00 9 5.2
.. 5 9 5.2
.0 1 1 .. 1
~~~~-~~~~~~~~-~~~~-~~-~-~--~~~~~--~-~--~~~--~-~~~~~~~~-~~~--~-~~~-~~
21
Table .. 3 ~) Cross section evations, trate and
cover data site 112 L ..
ion st Elev
Site (ft) (ft) Cov ___ ._, _____ 41M< ___
_.....,..,... _ _.,
-..-...~.-.... -____ ...,cZI!Ot ___
ion 1 505 .. 0 455 .. 1 1.,1
ion 0+00 513 .. 5 .08 1 lol
.. ) 520~5 460 .. 1 1 .. 1 RB
Cross Section 2 0 .. 0 3 1 .. 1 LB Headpin
ion 1.0 90 3 1 1
4a0 .. 70 3 1 .. 1
21.0 3 1 .. 1 .o 1.75 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 451.37 9 5.2 LWE
.. 0 450 .. 9 5.,3
75 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 60 9 5 .. 3
106 .. 0 450 .. 46 9 5 .. 3
1 .. 0 .. 10 9 ') .. 3
.. 0 .. 65 9 5.3
135 .. 0 449 .. 80 9 5 .. 3
157.0 450 .. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 20 9 5 .. 3
170 .. 0 450 .. 60 9 5 .. 3
180 .. 0 450 .. 9 5 .. 3
187 .. 0 1 .. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 451 .. 00 9 5 .. 3
~0 450 .. 30 9 5 .. 3
239.0 9 5 .. 3 .o 450 .. 70 9 5o3
.. 0 450 .. 70 9 5o3
311.0 450 .. 9 5 .. 3 .o .. 70 9 5 .. 3 .o .. 70 9 5.,3 .o 9 5 .. 3
"0 9 5 .. 3
.0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 8 5~~3
500 .. 0 1 .. 20 8 5.,3
.. 0 1 .. 20 8 5 .. 3
520 .. 0 450 .. 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 40 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5.3
.. 0 1.10 9 !L3
eO 451, 9 5o3 RWE
-----------~------~--~--~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~---------~~------~-,------~-~
B-
e .. 3 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
Location
Cross
Statior.t
Site
2
cover data site 112.61.
Hor
Dist
(ft)
550 .. 0
560.0
567.0
0 .. 0
1.0
10 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
0
110 .. 0
121 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
169 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
223 .. 0
.. 0
267.0
.. 0
.. 0
335 .. 0
340 .. 0
.. 0
400 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
485.0
500 0
516 .. 0
520 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 5
Bed
Elev
(ft)
452.30
455.
463 ..
457 .. 11
.80
.. 80
452 •
.10
451 .. 90
451 .. 80
452 .. 00
452 ..
452.
453 .. 40
453 ..
453 ..
453,.30
452 ..
451 .. 60
450.
450 ..
450 .. 50
450 .. 90
450 ..
451 .. 90
452 ..
453.00
455 .. 57
.. 72
9
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
7
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
12
9
9
12
1
1
B-23
Cov Comments
5 .. 3
1 1
1 ~ 1 RB Headpil:t
1 .. 1 LB Headpin
1 .. 1
1 .. 1 Bottom of cut bank
5 .. 3 LWE
1 .. 1
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
4.3
5 .. 3
5.3
5,.3 LWE
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
6 .. 3
6.3
6.3
6.3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
6 .. 3 RWE
6 .. 3
1 .. 1
1.1 of vegetation
1.1 RB Headpin
.3 , and
L ..
ion
Sub
_._ .... .._._.....,_...,_"*'*,.... ...,. ____
........... ,;:;w. ... ,...,....,... __ ~----
0.0 9 5.3
1~0 9 5 3
11.0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5 3
.. 0 9 5.3
40e0 9 5 .. 3
51 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5o3
80 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
.0 9 5 .. 3 .o 9 5 .. 3
0 9 5.,3
.. 0 9 54>3
,.0 9 5.,3
9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 ..
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5.2
0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
0 9 5.,2
.0 9 5.,2
.. 0 9 5 2
.. 0 9 5 .. 3 LWE
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5.,3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 3
.. 0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 Q 5,.3 "" .o 9 5 .. 3
1. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
C)o 9 5 3
eO 9 5.3
~~-~-----~~-~~---~-~~~~~--~----~--~---------------------~-·---------
e B-2 .. 3 .. ) section el ions, substrate
cover at site 1
ion st
te (ft) Sub _' _____ __.....,..,.._. __ ..., ____ ------....., __ ....,..,.. __ -
589 .. 0 453 .. 62 9 5 .. 3
0 453 .. 90 5.3
) .. 0 454 .. 11 5 .. 3
.o 455 .. 79 9 5 .. 3
.. o 456. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
693.5 9 5 .. 3 RB
s Section 4 0 .. 0 .. :5 .. 3 LB
ion 1 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
5 0 456. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 455 .. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 454 .. 9 5.3
.. o 453 .. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 453 .. 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5
60.0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
110 .. 0 .. 9 5.2
0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 455 • 5 .. 2
. 0 9 5 2
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
230 .. 0 12 6 .. 3
260 .. 0 .. 90 12 6 ..
262.0 9 5.3
290.0 .. 90 9 5 .. 3
.0 .. 90 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 453 .. 9 5.3
0 9 5 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 ..J .. 3
410 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
440.0 9 5 .. 3
446 .. 0 .. 25 9 5 .. 3
470 .. 0 .. 00 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 455 .. 13 7 4 .. 3
0 456 .. 7 4.2
.. 0 456 .. 7 4.2
.. 0 7 4.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-25
B-2.3 .. ) section
cover
t
(ft) Sub
..... ~.,... .............. ~ ......... _... .... _ __.._.....,.._., ------............ .,__ ..... _. ___
600 .. 0
.. 0 1
0 455 .. 1
.. 0 455 .. ., 4.2 I
~0 "' 7 4 .. 2
.. ti 7
.. 0 3 1 .. 1
710 .. 0 3 1.,1
3 1 .. 1
3 1.1
.. 0 1 .. 1
0 3 8 .. 3 LB
1 .. 0 3 8 .. 3
3 .. 0 3 8 3
.. 0 3 .. 3
3 1 1 LWE
20o0 9 ~ .. 2
0 9 So:/.:
0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 454, 9 5"2
.. 0 9 5,.2
.. o 9 5 .. 3
0 9 5 ..
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 453.47 9 5 .. 3
0 453 .. 50 5 .. 3
0 453 .. 5 .. 3
.. 0 453 .. 9 5 .. 3
0 9 3
.. 0 "
,.) 5"3 ""
.. 0 9 SoJ
400 .. 0 9 5,.3
405 .. 0 9 5.2 RWE
5 .. 2
9 5 .. 2
9 5,2
9 5~2
9 5 .. 2
___ ...,. _____________ ..,._,... ________ ~-~---~-.... ~ .... -.......... ---~------~lb--------·------.. ----
.. ) ~on el ions, subs e
cover at si 1 .. ~L ..
10n st
te (ft) Sub
..... --~~ ................. ~--~---.....-=e ..,,..._.,...._.._ lllilla----~--~ ....
.o .76 9 5.2
.. 0 456.20 9 5 .. 2
.o 4.56~40 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5.2
.. 0 9 S .. i.
.. 0 3 1 .. 1
610 .. 0 3 1.1
630 .. 0 .60 3 1 .. 1
648 .. 0 .30 3 1.1
653 .. 0 .50 3 1 .. 1
Cross 0 .. 0 460 .. 1 1.1 Headpin.
1 .. 0 460. 1 7.2
.. 0 457. 1 7 .. 2
30.0 • 1 7.2
.o 9 7 2 LWE
40(t0 .. 20 9 7 2
60.0 .70 9 .,
I •
.. 0 .07 9 5.2
.o 453. 9 5.2
.. 0 452 • 9 .5 .. 2
.. 0 452 .. 9 5.2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
.o 9 5 .. 2
240 .. 0 9 5.2
260 .. 0 9 5 .. 2
.0 9 5 .. 2
.0 5 .. 2
0 9 5.2
.o 9 5.2 .o 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
,.0 9 5.2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 .. 97 9 5.2
.. 0 .90 9 5 .. 2 RB in
------------~-----~-~~-~---------~---~-----~-----------------------
Table B-2 .. 3 (cont .. ) Cross section elevations, substrate ar.~d
cover data at site 112.~L.
Location
Within Site
Cross Section 7
Station 30+3~
Hor
Dist
(ft)
0.0
1 .. 0
10 .. 0
11 .. 0
20.0
40 .. 0
46 .. 0
50 .. 0
60 .. 0
70 .. 0
80 .. 0
90 .. 0
110.0
140 .. 0
143.0
175 .. 0
.. 0
208 .. 0
210 .. 0
238 .. 0
240 .. 0
270 .. 0
271.0
298.0
300 .. 0
320.0
326.0
330 .. 0
350 .. 0
.0
370 .. 0
379 .. 5
390.0
410 .. 0
411 .. 0
1 .. 0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
466 .. 59
461.31
459.10
458.81
458.20
457 .. 00
456 .. 59
456.50
456 ..
456 .. 30
456 .. 10
455 .. 95
455 .. 50
454,80
454 ..
452 ..
452 ..
452 .. 54
452 .. 50
452 .. 97
453 .. 00
453 .. 70
453.71
454,67
454 .. 80
455 .. 70
456 .. 04
456.20
457e40
457 .. 55
457 .. 90
458 ..
.. 90
46Qc50
460 .. 56
463c38
B-
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
9
9
9
12
12
9
12
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
12
12
12
12
12
12
Cov Comments
9.3
9.3
9.3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5.3
5 .. 3
6.3
6 .. 3
6.,3
5e3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
6 .. 3
6 .. 3
5.3
6 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 2
5.3
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
6 .. 2
6 .. 2
6 .. 2
6 .. 2
6 .. 2
6 .. 2
6 .. 2
LWE
RWE
RB Headpin
e .. 3 ont .. ) s section ions, subs e and
cover data at site 112.~L.
ion Elev
Site (ft) Cov Comments ----..:.--.. --..... ------_ ._ ___ IIGEII
____ ,... ___
s 0 .. 0 .so 1 8.2 Bot cut bank
1 oO "' 1 8.2
3 .. 0 1 9 .. 2
7 .. 0 1 8 .. 3 .o 463. 1 8.3
.. 0 460 .. 1 8 .. 3
.0 457 0 9 5 .. 3 LWE
.0 459. 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 60 9 5 .. 3
40.0 .20 9 5 .. 3
42 .. 0 .70 9 5.3
.. 0 .40 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 9 5 .. 3
85 .. 0 .72 9 5 .. 2
90.0 458 .. 40. 9 5.2
91 .. 0 .. 50 9 5 .. 2
110.0 .. 40 9 5 .. 2
120 .. 0 9 5.2
.. 0 7 4.3
.o 7 4.3
.. 0 7 4 .. 3
.. 0 458.30 7 4 .. 3
.30 7 4.3
200., s35 9 5.3
220 .. 0 .. 00 9 5 .. 3
248 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
260.0 .. 30 9 5 .. 3
280 .. 0 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5.3
0 9 5 .. 3
457. 9 5.3
.0 457. 9 5 .. 3
380.0 9 5 .. 3
400 .. 0 .. 60 9 5.3
410 .. 0 9 5 .. 3
.. 0 olO 9 5.3
.. 0 9 5.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
~-~~-~~-~-----~--~-~-~~~---~~------------~----~--~------~----~-~--
Table B-2 .. 3 (cont .. ) Cross section elevations, substrate and
ion
Site ____ .....,. __ ...... , ____ ....,
ion 8
ion 40+98
(cont .. )
cover data site 112.~L ..
Hor
st
(£
_...,.c.--. ...
450.,0
460.0
l)70 .. 0
524 .. 0
579o0
580 .. 0
602.,5
Sept ..
ion:
Bed
ev
(ft) --------
459 .. 50 9 5 .. 3
.. 80 9 5_,3
460 .. 10 9 5 .. 3
461. 9 5o2
462. 9 5o2
.,00 9 5.,2
9 5"2
B-
Comments
Headpin
e .. 4
Location
Site
Cross Section 1
Station 0+00
Cross Section 2
Station 3+80
s ion 3
Station 5+96
Cross section elevations, substrate and
eover data at site 119 .. 2R.
Hor
Dist
(ft)
0 .. 0
47 .. 0
104 .. 0
130.0
163 .. 0
184 .. 0
194 .. 0
198.0
203 .. 0
0.0
10.5
.. 0
32.0
84 .. 0
152 .. 0
168.0
180 .. 0
.0
0 .. 0
29.5
39 .. 5
.5
76 .. 0
92.0
108 .. 0
125.0
149 .. 0
162 .. 0
0.0
.0
.. 5
.. 0
87 .. 5
117.0
147 .. 0
161 .. 0
1 .. 0
1 .. 0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
511 .. 00
508 .. 71
508 .. 25
507 .. 20
506.91
501 .. 05
509.55
508.15
511.23
514.94
510 .. 12
508.92
508 .. 40
508~00
506 .. 30
506-20
508.
514 .. 63
513 .. 53
510 .. 56
508 .. 89
507.94
507s00
506.40
506 .. 50
505&03
508 .. 85
514 .. 21
513 .. 69
5 .. 48
.. 73
.90
508.20
508 .. 04
506.75
508c
511o73
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
13
13
3
3
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
Cov Comments
7.1
7 .. 1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
9.1
9~1
8.2
7 .. 1
7.1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
8 .. 3
8.2
5.1
5 .. 1
6 .. 1
6 .. 1
6.1
6 .. 1
6 .. 1
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
8.2
8 .. 2
8 .. 1
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
.. 4
Bottom of bank
LWE
RWE
Half way u1:~ bank
LB Headpin
LWE
RWE
RB Headpin
LB Headpin
LWE
RWE
RB Headpin
LB Headpin
LWE
RWE
RB Headpin
------------------------------------------·-------------------------
B-31
.4 (cont.) Cross section el ions, substrate and
cover at site 119.2R.
Hor
Location t ev
thin Si (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
.. --. ....... ~--illlliliCilllll ___ ---------............ _....,_ --.-.-----
s o.o 5 .26 11 8 .. 1 LB Headpin
.. 5 513 .. 71 11 8 .. 1
52.,0 512 .. 11 5.2
65.0 511 .. 11 5 .. 2
85 .. 0 11 5 .. 2
.. 0 11 6 .. 2 LWE
.. 0 11 6 .. 2 RWE
151 .. 0 508 .. 11 6.,3
.,o 5 11 6 .. 3
176 .. 0 5 .. 79 11 8 .. 4 Headpin
s See·tion 5 0$0 515 .. 3 6 .. 2 LB Headpin
ion 21 .. 5 514 .. 3 6 .. 2
57 .. 5 5 .. 72 11 6 .. 2
90 .. 0 5 8 6 .. 2
.. 0 512 • 10 6 .. 2
158 .. 0 512. 10 6 .. 2
179 .. 5 5 6,3
.. s 5llo42 10 6 .. 3
.. 0 511. 10 6 .. 3 LWE
.. 5 510 .. 10 6o2
293 .. 5 511 .. 6 .. 2 RWE
303 .. 0 5 .. 89 1 6 .. 1
.. 0 5 .,57 1 6 .. 1 in
-------------------------------------------------------------------
~ 6, 1984 ..
ion: USGS 1965 ..
32
Table
ion
Si
.. 5
ion 1
ion 0+00
Cross section evations, substrate and
cover data at site 131.7L.
Hor
st
(ft)
0 .. 0
1 .. 0
8 .. 0
.0
29.0
.. 0
~0
40 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
56.0
60 .. 0
.. 0
68 ..
72 .. 0
.. 0
. 0
.. 0
.. 0 .. o
96 .. 0
1 .. 0
.. 0 .o
.. o
1 .o
120 .. 0
.. o
.. o
.o
. 0
.. 0
0
.. 0
oO
.. 0
160.0
.. 0
.o
.. 0
Bed.
Elev
(ft)
.,20
621.90
619 .. 30
6 .90
6 .. 10
616 ..
6 .60
6 .. 00
614.60
614 ..
6 .. so
614.80
614 ..
6 .30
614 ..
.oo
614 .. 10
4 ..
614 ..
614 .. 30
6 .. 10
614 ..
6 .. 10
61 20
614 ..
614 40
6 o40
6 ..
614 ..
6 •
6 "
615 ..
6 ..
• .'50
615.
6 ..
6
6 ..
615 ..
6
6
1
1
12
12
12
12
12
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cov Comments
8 .. 5
8 .. 5
8 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1.1
1 .. 1
1.1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1.1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1.1
1" 1
1 .. 1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1"1
1 ..
1 .. 1
1 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 ~ 1
1 1
1.1
1.1
Headp
Beside he~;.dpin
LWE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
e B-2.5 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 131 .. 7L.
Bed
ion Dist ev
Site (ft) t) Sub Cov Co:mments
... ,......,am ____ ,..._......, ..., ____ ____ ...,._ --------
Cross tion 1 176.0 615 .. 80 1 1" 1
Station 0+00 .o 615 .. 80 1 1 .. 1
.) • o 615 • 1 1.1
.o 615.40 1 1 .. 1
1920)0 615. 1 1.1
196.0 6 .. 1 1.1
200.0 1 1$1
204.0 1 1 .. 1
208 .. 0 .. 20 1 1 Q 1
2 .0 615.30 1 1.1
2 .o 615 .. 40 1 1 .. 1
.0 615 .. 60 1 1 .. 1
224.0 615 .. 1 1" 1
.. 0 6 .. 1 1 ,. 1
.. 0 6 .. 1 1.1
234 .. 0 6 . 1 1. 1
236 .. 0 616 .. 90 1 1 .. 1
237 .. 0 616.80 1 1 .. 1
251.0 6 .. 80 1 8.2 Bot of: bank .o 621.10 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 624 00 1 8.2 Headpin
tion 2 0 .. 0 1 8 .. 2 LB Haadp
on 2+45 1 .. 0 1 8 .. 2 Beside in
2 .. 0 12 8 .. 2
14 .. 0 6 .. 12 5 .. 2
18 .. 0 6 • so 5.2 LWE
.0 615 .. 90 12 5.2
.. o 615 .. 80 12 5 .. 2
.. 0 615 .. 60 5 .. 2
.. 0 615 • 5 .. 2 .o 6 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5 .. 2
.,0 6 .. 10 5 .. 2
50.0 6 .5 .. 2
.. 0 6 .30 5 .. 2
.. 0 616 .. 50 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 616.20 10 5.2
.. 0 616 .. 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 616 .. 10 5 .. 2
.0 6 • 10 5 .. 2
------~-------~-------~---~~-~----~-~~--~-------------~~~,-~-~----~-
B-34
le .. 5 (cont.) s section elevations,
Cross Section 2
Station
(cont.)
cover at si 131
Hor
Dist
(ft)
78.0
81.0
86.0
90.0
94.0
98.0
102.0
106.0
110.0
114.0
1 .0
.o
.. o
130.0
134.0
138 .. 0
.o
147.0
150.0
. o .. o
161 .. 0
166 .. 0
169 .. 0
1 .. 0
1 eO
182 .. 0
186.0
190 .. 0
194 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
206.0
210 .. 0 .o
2 .. 0
222 .. 0
.. 0
1. 0. .o
Elev
(ft) Sub
616 ..
616.30
6 .40
.00
6 .20
616 ..
616.20
6 .. 90
.90
615 ..
616.
616 .. 10
616.00
616 .. 00
616 ..
616.20
616.00
.. 70
615.80
615 •
90
6 .80
616.40
616.
616 ..
.20
6 .4C
6 "
616.
616 .. 50
6 40
.50
616 ..
616 ..
6 .60
6 .60
6 .
616 ..
6 .80
6 .80
6
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cov
5 .. 2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5;,2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
4 .. 2
4.2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
.. 2
trate and
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B·-2 .. 5 (cont.) Cross section elevations~ substrate and
cover data at site, 131 .. 7L ..
_______ ,. ________ ....,..._.. ______ . ___ . __ .... ..,.. ___ ..... _,....~ ..... ---~...-.---..... --,.__--------·---1"' ______
~,... ______ .. _...._ ___ ._.......,_._..,._....,...,..,...,... ........................... _... ..... ..,...._ .......... _..,........,....,.. ____ ._.. __ ..., .... ...,.~ ........ --.... ..,.., ....... _.,.._, ___ IIJ> ______
Hor Bed
Locati1~n Dist Elev
thin Site (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
-------.-·~--, .... ... ...... ol'lllla'IIIIGIII ................ -.... ..., _________ ~111111!1:!-.
Cross S1ection 2 256 .. 0 617 .. 10 1 4 .. 2
Station 2+45 301 .. 0 622 .. 17 1 8 .. 2 Beside heaLdpin
(cont .. ) 301 .. 0 622 .. 1 8 .. 2 RB Headpin
Cross S1ection 3 0 .. 0 621.80 1 9 .. 4 LB Headpin
Station 6+45 0 .. 0 621 .. 57 1 9.,4 Beside heaLdpin
2o0 621 .. 60 1 6o 1
15.,0 617 .. 1 6 .. 1
24 .. 0 617 .. 50 1 6 .. 2
26 .. 0 617 .. 20 1 6 .. 2
28.0 617 .. 10 1 6 .. 2
30 .. 0 617 .. 10 1 6 .. 2
32.0 617 .. 10 1 6 .. 2
34 .. 0 616o60 12 6.,2 LWE
36 .. 0 616 .. 80 12 6 .. 2
38 .. 0 616 .. 60 12 6 .. 2
40 .. 0 616 .. 60 12 6 .. 2
44 .. 0 616.60 12 6 .. 2
48 .. 0 616 .. 70 12 6o 1
eO 616 .. 40 12 6o 1
56 .. 0 616 .. 10 12 6.,1
60 .. 0 616 .. 20 12 6 .. 1
64 .. 0 616.50 12 6 .. 1
68 .. 0 616 .. 10 12 6 .. 1
72 .. 0 616.00 12 6 .. 1
76 .. 0 615 .. 80 12 6.1
80 .. 0 6~5 .. 50 12 6 .. 1
84.0 615.40 12 6 .. 1
.. 0 615.20 12 6.1
.. 0 615 .. 20 12 6 .. 1
96 .. 0 615 .. 00 12 6 .. 1
100 .. 0 614 .. 80 12 6 .. 1
104 .. 0 614 .. 70 12 6 .. 1
.. 0 614 .. 90 6 .. 1
112,0 614 .. 60 12 6 .. 1
116.0 614 .. 70 12 6 .. 1
120 .. 0 614 .. 60 12 6 .. 1
124 .. 0 614 .. 80 12 6 .. 1
.. o 614 .. 70 12 6.1
132.0 614 .. 90 12 6.1 .o 6 .90 6.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
36
""'""-...... ~-...... ·------...... --.-.---.... --------........ -------...... --------~-~ ......... ----·-------, ..... -----......
e B-2.5 . ) Cross section el ions" substrate and
cover at 1 L.
______ ...., ___ .....,....,.._. _________ ~----...-----------------------------------·---,--,-----
------·-----..... ~---------..... ------.... ------------------.......... --......... ---·----------
Bed
ion t Elev
Si (ft) (ft) Sub Comments
........ CIII:Pftlllll __ ,......,. ___ ..,..~ __ ._. ...... ,..,
-----..... ~-.a
_____ ..,. ___
Cross 3 140 .. 0 615.00 6 .. 1
Station .. 0 615 .. 00 6 .. 1
(eont .. ) .. 0 615 • 6.1
615 .. 6 .. 1
6 0 12 6 .. 1
6.1
164.0 • 12 6.1
168.0 6 .. 1
172o0 6.1
.. 0 12 7 .. 1
.o 12 7 .. J
.0 "'t 1 . . .
.. 0 7.1
.. o 1 7 .. 1
.o 1 7 .. 1
.. 0 1 7.1
200.0 .. 60 1 7 .. 1
202 .. 0 .. 00 1 7 .. 1
206 .. 0 .. 10 1 7.1
208 .. 0 .. 90 1 7 .. 1 .o 617 .. 00 1 7.1
.. 0 617 .. 1 7 .. 1 .o 6 1 7 .. 1
.. 0 6 .. 1 7.1
.. 0 1 7.1
260 .. 0 .. 90 1 8 .. 2 Bot
266 .. 0 1 8 .. 2 Top
273.0 .. 11 1 8 .. 2 Bes
.. o ?23 .. 30 1 8 .. 2 Rll
tion 4 0.0 623. 1 2 .. 2 Headpi11
ion 9+45 1.0 1 2 .. 2 ide
7 .. 0 1 2.2 .o 6 .. 1 6 .. 2 . o 617 .. 1 6 .. 2 .o 6 .. 70 6 .. 2 LWE
.. 0 616 .. 60 6 .. 2
0 616 .. 20 6.,2
.. 0 616.10 6 .. 2
.. 0 12 6 .. 1
.. 0 6 6., 1
Table .5 (cont.) sect t
cover data
Hor
ion t ev
te (ft) ------------....., ___ ._.. ,.... .. _...,._.._
.,...,... _______
41.0 6 .. 1
.0 11 6 .. 1
45 .. 0 11 ~1
48 .. 0 11 6
.. 0 11 6
0 6.1
.. 0 11 6¢>1
.. 0 11 6.1
.. 0 11 6 .. 1
.. 0 .90 11 6 1
60 .. 20 11 6 1
64 .. 0 8 6 .. 1
68 .. 0 8 6 .. 1
.. o 8 6Q 1
.0 8 6ol
.o 8 6 .. 1
0 8 6.1
.. 0 8 6 .. 1
.. 0 6 .. 1
.. 0 8 6 .. 1
100 .. 0 8 6.,1
104.0 8 6.1
.0 8 6 1
.. 0 6 8 6 .. 1
616 .. 8 6 .. 1
0 616 .. 10 8 4 .. 2
.. 0 616 .. 00 8 4 .. 2
.. 0 616 .. 10 8 4 .. 2
130.0 6 .. s:t 4 .. 2
.. 0 8 2
.. 0 8 4,.2
0 8 4 ..
. o 8 4.2
.. 0 8 4,.2
cO 8 4 .. 2
.. 0 4 .. 2
163 .. 0 2 1,.1
167.0 2 l 1
.. 0 2 1 .. 1
;5.0 2 1 1
.. 0 1~~1
_____ .; ___________ Cjill8 ____ ...,.. __ ....... _~~~---..... -------------tllll;l!lo ........ _________ , ___ iliiiiiPI'....,. _____ <_...::-.
e B-2.5 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 131.71.
Ho,~· Bed
Location Dist Elev
Within Si (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
-------------...,...,... ___ -----·---------
s 216.0 619. 2 1 .. 1
J.On 231.0 619 .. 90 2 1 .. 1
(cont .. ) 283 .. 0 621 .. 2 1.1
302 .. 5 623 .. 2 8 .. 1 Beside he~:~dpin
303 .. 0 623 .. 97 2 8~1 RB Headp ir't
Cross Section 5 0 .. 0 622 .. 89 1 8 .. 4 LB Headp i I~'~
ion, 11+90 0 .. 0 .. 39 1 8 .. 4 Besi he~ltdpin
4c0 622 .. 30 1 9 .. 3
7 .. 0 618.00 1 9 .. 3
9 .. 0 617.10 7 .. 3 LWE
12 .. 0 615 .. 50 12 7.3
14.0 615 .. 30 12 7.3
18 .. 0 615 .. 90 12 7 .. 3
22 .. 0 615 .. 80 5 .. 2
.. 0 614.40 12 5 .. 2
30.0 614 .. 5 .. 2
34,.0 614. 12 5 .. 2
.. 0 614 .. 90 10 5 .. 2
.0 615 .. 50 10 5 .. 2
46 .. 0 615.40 10 5.2
50.,0 615 .. 10 5 .. 2
50 6l5c90 10 5 .. 2
58 .. 0 615 .. 80 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 615 .. 90 10 5 .. 2
~0 616 .. 00 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 616 .. 10 10 5.2
74.0 61'6. 70 10 5.2
78 .. 0 617.10 8 5.2
.. 0 617.30 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 617. 8 5 .. 2
90 .. 0 617. 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 617" d 5.2
.. 0 617 .. 50 8 5
• 0 617 .. 5 ..
,.0 617c 8 5.2
110.0 617.50 8 5 .. 2
114 .. 0 617 .. 50 8 5.2
118 .. 0 6 8 5 .. 2
0 617 .. 50 8 5.2
.. 0 B 5.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------
B-39
Table B-2 .. 5 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 131.~Le
Location
thin Site
Cross Section 5
Station 11+90
(cont .. )
Cross Section 6
Station 16+30
Hor
Dist
(ft)
130.0
134 .. 0
138 .. 0
142 .. 0
146 .. 0
150.,0
154 .. 0
oO
276 .. 0
380 .. 0
391.0
391 .. 0
0&0
0 .. 0
1 .. 0
11 .. 0
14 .. 0
17 .. 0
20 .. 0
22 .. 0
26.0
30 .. 0
34 .. 0
.o
. o
46 .. 0
50.0
54 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.0
70 .. 0
.. 0
.0
82 .. 0
86 .. 0
90 .. 0
92 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
617 .. 60
617.
617 .. 90
617 .. 80
618 .. 10
618 .. 10
618 .. 10
618 .. 20
620 .. 10
621o50
623 ..
623 .. 69
628.02
621 ..
623 .. 10
619 .. 40
618c70
.30
618 .. 10
6 .. 00
618 .. 00
617 .. 90
617.80
617 .. 60
617 ..
617 .. 70
617c80
617 .. 80
617 .. 10
616 .. 70
616 .. 30
616 ..
617 .. 00
617 ..
618 ..
.40
6 .50
618 ..
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
6
6
6
6
Cov Comments
4 .. 2
4.2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
8 .. 1
8$1 Beside headpin
8 .. 1 RB Headpin
8 .. 4 LB Headpin
8 .. 4 Beside headpin
8 .. 4
5 .. 2
5 .. 2 LWE
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.,2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table .5 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate
cover data at site 131 L.
H·or
ion st Elev
(ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
---~-1IESIII> ................... _ _..
__ ...., __
....... 411'11J--....-
_____ .,..C:::.ca:D
104.0 .. 90 6 5.3
.0 ,20 6 5.3
(conto) 110.0 619 .. 10 6 5 .. 3
114.0 619 e 10 6 5.3
117.0 6 .10 6 5.3 RWE
.o .. 00 6 5 .. 3
126 .. 0 619 .. 00 6 5.3
130 .. 0 619 .. 00 6 5 .. 3
138@0 619. 6 5 .. 3
.. 0 619 .. 00 6 5.3
1.0 elO 6 5 .. 3
• 0 619 • 6 5 .. 3
162.0 619 .. 6 5 .. 3
166 .. 0 6 .60 6 5 .. 3
1 .. 0 6 .. 40 6 5.3
1 .. 0 618. 6 5 .. 3
.. 0 618 .. 6 5 .. 3
182.0 6 .. 90 6 5 .. 3
.0 6 .. 90 6 5.3
.o 6 .80 6 5 .. 3
196 .. 0 618 .. 6 5.3
200 .. 0 6 .. 00 6 5.3
204.0 6 .. 80 6 5 3
.. 0 618 .. 90 6 5 .. 3
12.0 619 .. 0() 6 5 .. 3
.. 0 618.90 6 5 .. 3
220 .. 0 619 .. 20 6 5 .. 3
.. 0 6 .20 6 5.3
.. o 6 .. 20 6 5,3
.. 0 619 .. 6 5 .. 3
.. 0 619 .. 10 6 5 .. 3
.. 0 619.10 6 5.3
0 6 .. 10 6 5 .. 2
.0 6 .. 6 5 .. 2
.. 0 6l9e 6 5 .. 2
252.0 619 6 5.2
256.0 619.30 6 5 .. 2
.. 0 6 .. 30 6 5.2
.. 0 619 .. 6 5 .. 2
.0 6 . 6 5 .. 2
. o 6 .. 40 6 5.2
-~-~----~~~~~~~--~~-~~~~~~--~---~~-~-------~~~-~~~~~~-~----~-~-~-~-~
Table B-2.5 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 131 L.
Location
thin Site
s ion 6
ion 16+30
(cont.)
s Section 7
ion 19+05
Hor
Dist
(ft)
.0
.. 0
284 .. 0
342.0
358 .. 0
.. 0
0 .. 0
2.0
8.0
10 .. 0
14 .. 0
18 .. 0
20.0
.. 0
.. 0
32.0
36.0
.0
.o
48.0
51 0
.o
71 .. 0
.. 0
88 .. 0
92 .. 0
.o
.. 0
104 .. 0
108.0
1 .. 0
1 .. 0
120.0
124.0
128.0
1 .. 0
1 .0
140.0
144 .. 0
1 ~0
Bed
ev
(ft) Sub
.40
619 .. 30
619.
622.40
.. 92
.. 17
.40
620.00
619 ..
619 ..
6 .. 90
.. 10
620.
620.
.00
.80
62011
620 ..
f"ZO ..
620 .. 90
1.20
620 .. 90
620 ..
619 .. 50
.. 30
6 .. 10
619.50
620 .. 10
.20
.. 00
.10
620 .. 10
.. 10
.00
619.50
619 ..
6
.00
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
6
Cov Comments
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5e2
5 .. 2
8 .. 2
8 .. 2
5o2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.,2
5 .. 2
5.,2
5,2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5o2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 3
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5.2
4 .. 2
4.:2
4 .. 2
4.,2
4.,2
4 2
4 .. 2
LL.2
5 .. 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5~2
5.2
Beside in
Headpin
LB Headp
ide
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B~-2 .. 5 (cont .. ) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 131.7L.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hor Bed
Location Dist Elev
Within Site (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
-------~--C11131---------.... .--...... -____ ,.... ___
Cross Section 7 152 .. 0 620.00 6 5 .. 2
Stat iorJl 19+05 156.0 619.90 5.2
(cont .. ) 160 .. 0 619 .. 90 6 5.2
164 .. 0 620.00 6 5 .. 2
168 .. 0 619.80 6 5.2
172 .. 0 619.70 6 5.2
176.0 619.70 6 5.2
178 .. 0 619.70 6 5.2
182.0 619 .. 80 6 5.2
186.0 619.80 6 5.2
190 .. 0 619.80 6 5.2
194.0 620 .. 00 6 5.2
198.0 620 .. 10 6 5.2
202 .. 0 620 .. 1 6 6 .. 2
208 .. 0 620.00 6 6.2
212 .. 0 619 .. 90 6 6 .. 2
216 .. 0 620 .. 00 6 6.2
220.0 620 .. 00 6 6.2
224"0 620 .. 10 6 6.2
228 .. 0 620 .. 00 6 6.2
232 .. 0 619 .. 90 6 6.2
236 .. 0 620 .. 10 6 6 .. 2
240.0 620 .. 10 6 6 .. 2
244.0 620 .. 10 6 6.2
248~0 620~10 6 6 .. 2
254.0 620.10 6 6.2
258 .. 0 620 .. 10 6 6.2
262.0 620 .. 10 6 6 .. 2
266.0 620 .. 10 6 6 .. 2
270.0 620 .. 00 6 6 .. 2
274 .. 0 620.10 6 6 .. 2
278.0 620 .. 00 6 6.2
.0 620.20 6 6 .. 2
285 .. 0 620.00 6 6.2
.0 620,20 6 6 .. 2
290 .. 0 620.00 6 6.2
294 .. 0 620 .. 40 6 6.2 RWE
298 .. 0 620 .. 20 6 6 .. 2
302 .. 0 620.70 6 5.2
305"0 620.70 6 5 .. 2
311.0 .40 6 5o2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-43
le B-2.5 (cont.) Cross section el ions, subs e and
cover data at site 131.7L.
Hor Bed
Dist Elev
(ft) (ft) Sub Comments
....,.. ........... -~--------------___ <taR ___ _ ..........................
Cross 7 315.0 620 .. 40 6 5 .. 2
Static,n cO 620 .. 40 6 5 .. 2
(cent Q) .0 620.40 6 5o2 .o 620.40 6 5 .. 2
1.0 620.40 6 5 .. 2
335o0 .40 6 5.2
339.0 6 5 .. 2
343o0 .40 6 5.2
347.0 620.40 6 5.2
1.0 620 .. 40 6 5.2
.0 620 .. 50 6 5 .. 2
.. 0 620 • 6 5 .. 2
.. o 620 .. 6 .5.,2
367.0 620. 6 5.2
414 .. 0 10 5c.2
432 .. 0 10 8 .. 4 Besi :Ln
432.0 .. 83 10 8 .. 4 RB in
~~~--~~~~~-~---~--~-~----~-~~---~~~~~-~~~--~--------------~~~-~~-~--
Sept .. ' 1984 ..
Reference elevation: Alcap lolSl RB 1982 ..
B-44
--------·-----------------------------------------------------------
Table B-·2.6 Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 132~bL ..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hor Bed
Locatio1n Dist Elev
Within Site (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments _....,..,. ... _________ ------------_____ .,... __
Cross se~c t ion 1 0.0 630 .. 20 1 2 .. 5 LB Headpin
Station 0+00 8e7 626.10 1 2 .. 5
9 .. 0 625 .. 50 1 2 .. 5
9.3 625 .. 50 1 2.5
9 .. 5 625.20 10 5.2
10.0 625.40 10 5 .. 2
12.0 625 .. 30 10 5 .. 2
14 .. 0 625 .. 30 10 5.2
16 .. 0 625.50 10 5.2
18 .. 0 625.20 10 5.2 LWE
20 .. 0 625 .. 40 10 5 .. 2
·21 .. 0 625.30 10 5.2
24 .. 0 625 .. 00 10 5.2
28.0 625 .. 20 10 5.3
29 .. 0 625 .. 00 10 5 .. 3
31 .. 0 624c80 10 5g3
32.0 625 .. 30 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 625 .. 00 10 5.3
36.0 624 .. 90 10 5 .. 3
39.0 625.20 10 5 .. 3
40 .. 0 625 .. 30 10 5 .. 3
43 .. 0 625 .. 30 10 5.3
44.0 625 .. 20 10 5.3
47.0 625 .. 20 10 5.3
48.0 624.80 10 5.3
51 .. 0 625 e 10 10 5.3
52 .. 0 624 .. 90 10 5.3
55 .. 0 624 .. 90 10 5 .. 3
56.0 624 .. 60 10 5.3
59~0 624 .. 80 10 5 .. 3
60.0 624 .. 60 10 5 .. 2
63.0 624 .. 90 10 5.2
.. 0 624.60 10 5.2
67.0 624 .. 70 10 5.2
68.,0 624o70 10 5.2
70.0 624.60 10 5.2
72 .. 0 624 .. 70 10 5.2
74 .. 0 624 .. 90 10 5.2
76 .. 0 625.00 10 2.2 RWE
77.8 625.50 10 2.2
.. 0 625.50 10 2 .. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-45
Table .6 (cont.) s section elevationsj substrate and
cover data at site 132 .. ~L ..
Hor Bed
ion st Elev
Within (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
-------·-----____ .....
_...,.._.._ ___ --------
s Section 1 80.0 626.10 10 2 .. 2
ion. 0+00 83 .. 0 .. 70 1 8 .. 3 Top
.) 98 .. 0 .. 80 1 8 .. 3
109 .. 0 630. 1 8 .. 3 RB Headpin
Cross 0.0 630 .. 1 2.5 Headpirt
Station 4.0 627 .. 10 1 9 .. 3 Bottom of bank
.. 5 626 .. 60 1 5 .. 2
31.5 .30 1 5 .. 3
32 .. 0 .. 20 1 5 .. 3
34 .. 0 .00 1 5 .. 3
36 .. 0 .80 1 5.,3
.. 0 1 5 .. 3 LWE
.. 0 625 .. 40 1 5 .. 3
. 0 625 • 1 5.,3
.. 0 625 .. 1 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 30 10 5 .. 3
46 .. 0 .. 20 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 10 10 5 .. 3
50.0 .. 80 10 5 .. 3
oO 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5.2 .o 10 5.2
.o 624. 10 5.,2
.. o 624.50 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 624.70 1t" .• v 5.2
64.0 624 .. 60 5 .. 2
66.0 624.60 10 50~:
68 .. 0 .60 10 5 .. 2
70 .. 0 10 5 .. 3
72 .. 0 .. 00 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 625 .. 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 625.30 10 5 .. 3
.. o 625e70 5o3
.. 0 625.90 10 5a3
.. 0 .. 10 10 5.3
84.0 .. 00 lrl ·,~,~ 5 2
86.0 .. 20 10 5$2
.. 0 .20 10 5 .. 2 .o 10 5 .. 2 .o Se2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-46
Table B-2.6 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 132.6L.
Locati~on
thin Site
Cross S~eetion 2
Station 1+24
(cont .. )
Cross Section 3
Station 2+46
Hor
Dist
(ft)
96 .. 0
100 .. 0
104.0
111.5
139 .. 0
161 .. 0
0 .. 0
8 .. 5
23 .. 0
23 .. 5
.0
26.0
28 .. 0
30.0
32.0
34.0
36.0
38.0
40 .. 0
42 .. 0
44.0
46.0
48 .. 0
50.0
52.0
54.0
58 .. 0
62.0
66 .. 0
70.0
74.0
78 .. 0
.. 0
82 .. 0
84.0
86.0
38 .. 0
90.0
90.3
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
626.10
626 .. 00
626.30
627.30
629.60
630.90
631.16
629.80
627.30
626.90
626 .. 90
626 .. 30
626 .. 20
626 .. 00
626 .. 10
625.90
625 .. 90
625 .. 80
625 .. 30
624 .. 90
625 .. 10
625 .. 10
625.40
625 .. 80
625 .. 80
626 .. 10
626.50
627o00
627 .. 00
627.20
627 ~ 10
627 e 10
626.80
627 .. 00
627 .. 00
626.90
627 .. 00
627.30
.. 30
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cov Comments
5 .. 2
5e2
5 .. 2
5.1
5.1
5.1
2.5
2.5
2.5
5e2
5.2
5.2
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5.3
5.3
5 .. 3
5.3
5 .. 3
5.3
5 .. 3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5 .. 3
5.2
5.2
5 .. 2
5o2
5 .. 2
5o2
5o2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
Top of bank
RB Headpin
LB Headpin
LWE
RWE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B-2 6 (cont.) section ions, substrate and
cover data at si 132.GL.
Hor Bed
Location st Elev
Within Site (ft) Sub Cov
-~-----"''iil!!l-........ ........ .._ __ -----------------
s SE~ction 3 95 .. 0 628.10 1 5 .. 1
104.4 .10 1 5 .. 1
139.5 1 5.,1 RB Headpin
Cross ion 4 0 .. 0 631.,00 1 2 .. 5 LB Headpin
Station 3+90 17.6 628.,00 1 2.,3
.. 0 621.,50 8 2 .. 3 of
20.0 o50 8 2.,3
22 .. 0 .. 40 8 5 .. 3
24.0 .50 8 5 .. 3
30.0 .. 20 8 5.,3
.o o20 8 5o3
,.0 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 627 .. 10 8 5 .. 3
.. 0 .. 10 8 5 .. 3
40 .. 0 627.10 8 5.,3
42 .. 0 .. 00 8 5 .. 3
44 .. 0 .,20 8 5.3
46,.0 .80 8 5.,3
48 .. 0 8 5 .. 3
50 .. 0 8 5 .. 2
51.0 626 .. 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 626.10 8 5.2
.. 0 626 .. 30 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 626.30 8 5 .. 2
.. 0 .. 30 8 5 .. 2
61.0 626 .. 8 5 .. 2
62 .. 0 .30 8 5.,3
64 .. 0 .70 8 5.,3
66.0 8 5,.3
68.0 8 5.,3
.. 8 627 .. 10 10 5 .. 3 RWE
0 627 .. 20 5 .. 3
.. 0 627 .. 10 10 5 .. 3
76.0 627.20 5e3
78 .. 0 .. 20 10 5 .. 3
80.0 .. 20 10 5.3
84.0 10 5 .. 3
.0 .10 10 5 .. 3
.. 0 627. 5oJ .o 627. 10 51)3
-------~--~-~-------~~---------~------~------------·----------------
B-48
e .6 (cont.) Cross section elevations, subs e
cover at site 1 .. bL.
---~----------------~-~~-~-------~-~---~-----~---------------------
~~~-~-~~~~----~~-~~~~-~-------------------~----~~~----~--~---~-----~
Bed
ion st ev
Site (ft) Sub
____ 1l:lllial ___ .....,_ ......... ,... -----................... --...... -----
92.0 .10 5 .. 3
.o 627.40 5.3
.o 627.20 5 .. 3
.0 627.20 5 .. 2
.o 627. 10 5 .. 2
106.,0 10 5.2
110.0 10 5.2
114.0 10 5 .. 2
118 .. 0 5 .. 2
.0 5 .. 1
.0 5.1
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 10 5.1 .o 1 5.1
.0 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 1 5.1
.5 .. 00 1 5.1
.o .. 10 1 5 1
199.0 .. 00 1 5 .. 1
Cross ion 5 0 .. 0 631. 1 2 .. 5
Station 11 .. 0 628 .. 1 3 .. 2
.. 5 1 3 2 of
.. 0 10 3 2 LWE
46 .. 0 10 3 .. 2
48 .. 0 10 5 .. 2
50.0 .. 60 10 5 .. 2
52 .. 0 .60 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 626 .. 20 5.2
0 626. 5 .. 2
.. 0 626 .. 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 10 5 .. 2
10 5 .. 2
66.0 10 5.2
68 .. 0 5 .. 2
70.0 5.2
0 5.2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.. 0 5 .. 2
.o 5.2
.0 .. 5 .. 2
____ ......,_..,. ___ ...,..,. __ , ...,....,.._____ .. __ ._. _______ .,.... ____________ ..,. __ ---------------........ -.... ~----
.. 6 .. ) section and
cover
(ft)
.................... ~.....--......... ,_, ._, ....................... .-..----~ .....~ ..... ~ .... -.... -
Section 5 90 .. 0 10 5 .. 2
ion 5+11 .o 10 5 .. 2
.. ) 10 s 2
10 5.2
10 5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.,2
s ..
114.0 5 2
116.0 10 Se2
118.0 10 5 2
.. o 10 5 2
.. 0 6 RWE
.. 0 6 .. 1
0 6 .. 1
.. 0 6 .. 1
.. 0 6 .. 1
.. 0 6.1
(0 10 5 .. 1
.. 0 5.,1
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 5 .. 1
.. 0 1.1
.. 0 1 .. 1
.. 0 1.1
~0 1 "1
.. 5 1 1 .. 1 Top
.. 0 1 .. 1
.. 0 5.1
0 0 631..80 2 .. 5
oO 629 .. 10 2,3
.. 0 628 • 2.3
.. o 1 2.3 LWE
32 .. 1 2 .. 2
11 2 .. 2
.. 0 11 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 5<>2
.. 0 5 .. 2
~-----..-------,.,_,,.._ ____________ ..., __ ...,_......_.....,~,...,. ......... ...,. .... ___________ ....._ ____ ...._ ____ »-___ , _______
.......... ~ ......... --------,.... ............. _____ ,.......,.__. __ ....,.. __ ..,........, _______ ~-·-----...----._. ..... ________ ..... _____ , __ ...., .. ___ ,__
.6 (cont .. ) Cross section elevations, substrate
cover data site 132 .. GL.
--~----------....... -~-~lea _._...., ___________ .,... __ ..., ____ ....,.,......,...,.._....,. ..... ~~--..."MMJJ!$.~ ... _.._, __ ,_..., ___ ~------------
""'!'1'··~~'~.,~~"""""'~.-.~....,_.. .... ..,.. ___ ~~ ............. --...,., ..... -----.... ------...... ~---... ----... --
Hor Bed
Location Dist Elev
thin Site (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments
__ .._._ ... ~ ...... CI!!!lrl __ ...... _. .... .._ ... ....., .... ___ ______ ....,,....
6 .. 0 .. 20 8 5 .. 2
Stati or1 46 .. 0 .. 00 8 5 .. 1
(cont .. ) 50 .. 0 626 .. 20 10 5.1
.. o 10 5 .. 1
56 .. 0 625 .. 40 5 .. 1
.. 0 625 .. 11 5.1
.. o olO 11 5 .. 1
.. 0 625 .. 11 5 .. 1
.. 0 .. 40 11 5 .. 1
70.0 11 5 .. 1
.. 5 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 l 5 .. 1
.. 0 625 .. 30 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 625 .. 70 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 .. 70 1 5 ~ 1
.0 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 .. 00 1 5.1
.. 0 626 .. 00 1 5 .. 1
.. 0 626 .. 00 1 1.,1
.. 0 1 1 .. 1
94 .. 0 626 .. 30 1 lcl
,.0 1 1 .. 1
.0 1 1 .. 1
100.0 1 1.,1
102 .. 0 .80 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 .. 90 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 1 1 .. 1 RWE
1 .. 0 .. 20 1 1 .. 1
110 .. 0 627 .. 30 1 1 .. 1
112 .. 0 1 1 .. 1
1 .. 0 .. 50 l 1 .. 1
1 .. 0 1 1 .. 1
1 .. 0 1 1 .. 1
.0 .. 90 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 .. 10 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 .. 20 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 1 1 .. 1
1 8 .. 2
1 8 .. ll!l
_______ .. ___ """""' __ • ., _______________ . ________ . .,_ ___ OIL'-_41:1» ______________ ,_ .. ______ .. __ _
.. 6 .. ) s section elevations, trate and
cover data at site 132 .. GL ..
Elev
(ft) Cov ......... ._...__...,_.......,_ __ ....., ..... ____ ----------..... ---
s o.o 1 2.5 LB
o2 1 2 .. 2
20 .. 0 1 2 .. 1
.0 1 6 ..
.. 6 1 6 .. 2
.5 627 .. 1 6.,2
.. 0 626~ 1 6.,2
.. 0 1 6 .. 2
.. 0 1 6 .. 2
30.0 .. 60 1 5 .. 2
32 .. 0 .60 1 5 .. 2
34.,0 1 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 5 2
.. o 1 5
.. o 624 .. 1 5.,2
.. 0 624. 1 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 5,2
1 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 5 ..
62.,0 1 !L2
64,0 1 5 .. 2
.. 0 1 5 .. 2 .o 1 5 .. 2
.0 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 1 1 .. 1
$0 1 1 .. 1
78 .. 0 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 1 1,1
.. 0 1 1 1
.. 0 1 1 1
.. o 1 1 .. 1
.. 0 627.10 1 1 0 1
.20 1 1.,1
.. o .. 30 1 1&1
.. 0 .. 60 1 1,.1
.o 1 1 .. 1
.0 1 1.1 ,o 1 1.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
le
ion
.6 (cont.) Cross
cover
Dist
Site (ft)
...... ...-~...---....,-~--........ .-....... _
s 104 .. 0
106.0
108 .. 0
1 .0
121 .. 5
131&5
145.0
.. 5
0 .. 0
18 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
24.0
.. 0
.. 0
31 .. 0
.. 0
33 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
0
43 .. 0
.. 0
<lo
.. 0
51 .. 0
52 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
u
.. 0
.o
. o
.. 0
0
0
Elev
(ft)
-----~
.. 90
627 ..
.. 30
.. 60
629 .. 40
629.
.. 60
633 .. 40
628 ..
.. 30
.. 10
627,.
.00
.. 70
626 ..
626 ..
.. 80
.. 20
626 .. 40
626 ..
.. 20
.10
625 ..
.. 60
Sub
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
ions, substrate and
.. GL ..
Cov Comments _ ___ .....,..._~-
1 .. 1
L.l
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
lel
5.1
5 .. 1
2 .. 5 LB Headp
7.2
7.2
7 .. 2 LWE
7 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
s 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5.,2
5 .. 2
5 2
5.2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
.3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5~3
5.2
5.2
5 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 1
5 .. 1
1 .. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B-2.6 (cont .. ) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 132.6L.
Location
Wi thi11 Site
Cross Section 8
Stati~~n 9+79
(cont ,. )
Cross Section 9
Stati4:>n 11 +31
Hor
Dist
(ft)
88 .. 0
91 .. 0
92 .. 0
95.0
96.,0
98.0
99 .. 0
100.0
102 .. 0
103 .. 0
105.7
128 .. 0
155 .. 0
168 .. 0
178 .. 0
0 .. 0
4.,0
6 .. 0
9 .. 0
12 .. 0
14 .. 0
16 .. 0
.19 .. 0
25 .. 0
.o
32.0
34 .. 0
.. 0
40 .. 0
S5a0
.. 0
.. 5
90~8
92,0
94 .. 0
96.0
98 .. 0
100.0
103.0
108$0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
625 .. 90
626 .. 60
626 .. 20
626.60
627 .. 00
627 .. 40
626 .. 80
627.,00
627" 10
627 .. 20
627.50
630.00
629 .. 80
631 .. 40
632 ..
631 .. 10
.60
628 .. 40
627 .. 70
627o50
627e30
626.70
626 .. 10
.20
.60
626o80
627.,70
628 .. 40
629.70
629o60
629.,00
628e
628.40
628 .. 20
628 .. 00
627.,90
627 .. 70
627 .. 70
627.60
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
Cov Comments
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1.1
1 .. 1
lQl
lol RWE
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
1.,1
4ol
4 .. 1
4., 1 RB Headpin
2,.5 LB Headpin
2 .. 5
2o5
2o3 LWE
2 .. 1
2 .. 1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
7 .. 1
7.1
5 .. 2 RWE
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5o2
5o2
5.,2
5 .. 2
5e2 LWE
5,2
5.,2
5 .. 2
5.,2
5.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-54
Table B-2.6 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 132.bL.
Location
Within Site
Cross Section 9
Station 11+31
(cont .. )
Hor
Dist
(ft)
112 .. 0
116 .. 0
120.0
124.0
127 .. 0
130.0
132.0
134.0
136.0
140.0
142 .. 0
144.0
148.0
152 .. 0
156eQ
158 .. 5
164 .. 0
168 .. 0
170 .. 6
176 .. 0
180 .. 0
183.0
184.0
186 .. 0
193 .. 0
210 .. 5
219 .. 0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
627 .. 60
627.70
627.70
627.70
628.00
628 .. 20
628.20
627 .. 90
627.60
627.20
627.20
627 .. 30
627 .. 60
627.50
627.70
.. 60
627.60
627.60
628.10
.. 10
.. 00
627 .. 80
628 .. 20
628.40
629.30
631.00
631 .. 60
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
Cov Comments
5.,2
5 .. 2
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5o3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
5.,3
5a3
5 .. 3
5 .. 3
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5a2
5 .. 2
5c2
8 .. 3
8a3
8 .. 3
8 .. 3
8.,3
8.3
RWE
LWE
RWE
RB Headpit'l
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of survey: Sept. 7, 1984o
elevation: Alcap 131.151 RB 1982&
55
Table .. 7 section evations, trate and
cover data at si 136.0L.
---~------------~-------------------------------------------~-------
----------~----------~------------~-~---~-----------------~~-----~-
Hor
10n st ev
Site (ft) Sub Cov Comments
--------------------lllilllll:l----------
s 1 0"0 .70 1 8.3
ion 0+00 1.0 8.3
9.,0 0 6 .. 2
11 .. 0 12 6 2 LWE
14.0 12 7.,1
.0 674, 7'" 1
oO 674~ 7 .. 1
c.S 674 .. 7" 1
.. 0 674 .. 7"1
.. 0 .. 50 2 7 .. 1
.0 .40 2 7 .. 1
28 .. 0 1 1
30 .. 0 1 7
.. 0 1 7 .. 2
.0 1 7 2
.. 0 1 7 .. 2
.. 0 1 7e2 .. o 1 7.2
.. 0 1 7 .. 2 .. o 7 .. 2
46,0 7.2
,0 10 7 .. 2
.. 0 10 7 .. 2
.. 0 7 2
.. 0 674 .. 7 .. 2
0 674 .. 7 .. 2
.. 0 673 .. 60 7.2
.. 0 673.10 7,.2
.. 0 .50 7.2
64 .. 0 6 7 .. 2
.. 0 6 2
.,0 6
.. 0 6 7
,0 1 7.,2
.. 0 7 .. 2
.. o 7 .. 2
.. 60 1 8.,2
80 .. 0 .00 8 8,
80 .. 9 8 8.2
.. 0 8 2
.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B-2.7 (cont.) Cross section elevations, substrate and
cover data at site 136.0L.
Location
Within Si
Cross Section 1
Sta.tiorl 0+00
(cont .. )
Cross Section 2
Station 0+88
oss 1on 3
Station 1+95
Hor
Dist
(ft)
88 .. 0
91 .. 5
93 .. 5
0 .. 0
3 .. 0
4 .. 0
17 .. 0
20 .. 0
22 .. 0
.. 0
26.0
28 .. 0
30 .. 0
.. 0
34 .. 0
36 .. 0
.. 0
40 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
46 .. 0
.. 0
50 .. 0
52 .. 0
54 .. 0
56 .. 0
58.0
60 .. 0
62 .. 0
.. 0
73 .. 0
.. 0
.. 5
0 .. 0
3 .. 0
9 .. 0
10 .. 0
1 • 0
.. 0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
677 .. 90
682 .. 50
683 .. 00
682 .. 84
1 .. 00
677 .. 40
676 .. 10
676 .. 00
675 .. 80
675.60
675 .. 40
674~80
675 .. 10
674 .. 90
674 .. 77
674 .. 50
674 .. 10
.. 80
~80
673.00
672 .. 70
672 .. 60
673 .. 00
673 .. 20
673 .. 30
673 .. 50
673 .. 90
673 .. 90
674 .. 80
.. 80
681 .. 00
683 .. 30
.. 91
.. 63
678 .. 50
675 .. 80
675 .. 60
.90
B-
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
10
Cov Comments
8 .. 5
9 .. 4
9 .. 4
4 .. 1
4 .. 2
4,.2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4.2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
7 .. 2
7.,2
7o2
7o2
7e2
7 .. 2
7.2
7Q2
.., 2
7.2
7.,2
7.2
7 .. 2
7 .. 2
8 .. 2
8 .. 4
8 .. 4
8 .. 4
5.3
4 .. 2
4.2
4 .. 2
4,.2
4.2
Bottom of bank
Top of b~u1k
RB Headpi111
LB Headp i111
Top of b~u1k
LWE
RWE
RB Headpin
LB Headpin
Table ~~-2 .. 7 (cont.) Cross section elevations,-substrate and
cover data at site 136 .. 0L.
Location
Within Site
Cross Section 3
Station. 1+95
(cont .. )
Cross Section 4
Station 2+91
Hor
Dist
(ft)
16 .. 0
18 .. 0
20,0
22 .. 0
24 .. 0
26.0
28 .. 0
30 .. 0
32 .. 0
34.0
36.0
38 .. 0
40 .. 0
42,0
44.,0
.. 0
47 .. 5
55.0
59 .. 0
61 .. 0
63 .. 0
0.0
2 .. 5
7.5
10 .. 0
l2o0
12 .. 5
14 .. 0
.. 0
18 .. 0
20 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.0
28.0
30 .. 0
32 .. 0
34 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
Bed
Elev
(ft) Sub
674 .. 10
673 .. 70
673.70
673.80
673 .. 70
673.70
673 .. 80
673 .. 90
673 .. 90
674.00
674.30
674oJQ
674 .. 10
674 .. 10
674 .. 00
675e2Q
675 .. 30
678 .. 50
1 .. 00
682 .. 80
.. 86
683 .. 16
680.30
677 .. 50
676 .. 10
675 .. 50
675 .. 59
675 .. 60
675 .. 00
674 .. 70
674 .. 60
674.40
674.00
674 .. 10
674~00
674o00
674.10
.30
674 .. 40
674.50
12
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cov Comments
7.2
7 .. 2
7.,2
7 .. 2
7 .. 2
7o2
7.,2
7o2
7 .. 2
7.2
7 .. 2
7.,2
1 .. 2
7 .. 2
7 .. 2
7.2
7.,2
7 .. 2
8 .. 5
8 .. 5
8 .. 5
8.4
7 .. 4
6.3
6 .. 3
6 .. 3
6 .. 3
6 .. 3
4.,1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4.,1
4.1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
RWE
Top of bank
RB Headpin
LB Headpin
Bottom of l)ank
LWE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-58
Table .. 7 (cont.) s section elevations, s trate and
Locat on
Wi Site
4
s Section 5
ion 4+23
cover data at site 136 .. 0L.
Hor
st
(ft)
40.0
42.0
44.0
46 .. 0
.. 0
.o
.0
.0
.. o
58 .. 0
60 .. 0
62 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 5
.. 3
82 .. 5
.. 5
.. 5
0 .. 0
2 .. 5
.. 7
14 .. 0
.. 0
17.0
18 .. 0
20.0
vO
24.0
.. 0
.. o
5
.. 0
.0
36 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
Elev
(ft) Sub
674o60
.. 80
674.90
674.90
675 .. 00
675 .. 10
675 .. 30
.30
.. 60
.. 70
.. 80
676.
676 ..
676.60
679 .. 60
.. 16
.. 41
1 ..
677" 10
676 .. 60
676 .. 60
.. 35
676 .. 30
.. 20
.. 30
676o
676.10
675 .. 80
.40
674 ..
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
10
13
13
13
13
13
Cov
4ol
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
7 •. 2
7 .. 2
7 .. 2
7 .. 2
7 .. 2
8.4
8 .. 4
8 .. 4
8 .. 4
8.4
6,. 1
6 .. 1
6.1
6 .. 1
6.1
6.1
6 .. 1
6 .. 1
6 .. 1
6 .. 1
6 .. 1
6.1
6 .. 1
8 .. 2
8 .. 2
8,.2
.2
8.
8 .. 2
s
Bottom of bank
Top of b~utk
RB
LB Headp
RWE
LWE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
e .7 (cont.) Cross section el ions, subst e and
cover data at site 1 .OL~
l.on Dist Elev
Site (ft) (ft) Sub Cov Comments ________ ..,..flllllililll ___ --.... ----____ ._.,....c---------
s 48.0 .70 8.2
50.0 674. 8 .. 2
52.0 674. 13 8 .. 2
.0 .70 13 8 .. 2
.. 0 o70 8 .. 2
.,Q 674 • 8 ,.,
'!>"'-"
60 .. 0 674~ 8.,2
.. 0 673o90 12 8.,2
.. 0 .. 70 12 8 .. 2
.. 0 .90 12 8.2
68.,0 .90 8 .. 2
70 .. 0 673 .. 8 .. 2
.,0 673 .. 90 12 8 .. 2 ,o .. 10 8 .. 2 .. o 674 .. 1 8 2
78 .. 0 675 .. 1 8 .. 2
.. 0 677. 1 8 .. 2
.8 .. 70 1 8 .. 2
80 .. 5 1 8 .. 4
83 .. 0 680 .. 1 8.4
.,0 685, 1 8.4
91 .. 0 .. 10 1 8 .. 4 RB l.fi
s 0 .. 0 1 8 .. 5 LB Headp
8 .. 0 681 .. 60 1 9 .. 5 Top of
8~5 678 .. 50 10 9 .. 5
.. 0 .. 50 10 4 .. 2
11 .. 0 .. 00 4.2
11 .. 5 677 .. 4 .. 2
12 .. 0 676 .. 10 4 .. 2
.. 0 10 4~2
.. 0 .. 60 11 4 .. 2
18 .. 0 11 4 .. 2
.. 0 676 .. 11 4 .. 2
• 0 675 • 11 4.,2
.. 0 ~90 11 4 .. 2
0 11 4 .. 2 .o 4 .. 2
30 .. 0 675.10 10 4 .. 2
.. 0 10 4.2 .o 4.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
60
e .. 7
Section 6
.) Cross section elevations,
cover at site .OL.
Hor
Dist
(ft)
36$0
Elev
(ft) Sub
38 .. 0 675.10
.o .10 10
.0 10
44~0
.. 0
.. 0
.0 10
52.0
54 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0 10
.. 0
62.0 6
63.3 6
.0 6
. 0 6
.. 0 6
76.0 1
79 .. 0 1
81.0 1
Cov
4 .. 2
4o2
4 .. 2
4o2
4 .. 2
4.2
4.,2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 2
4 .. 1
4 .. 1
4.1
4 .. 1
4,.1
4 ..
4 .. 1
.. 1
7.3
9 .. 5
9 .. 5
trate and
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Date : c 9,
elevation: R&M Al .. 5Q3
le s section elevations,
cover at site
ion st Elev
(ft) Cov s;
_,...... .... ._. ___ ...,......,. __ ...,..,._.....,_ .......................... ---------·
tion 1 0 0 1 8
on 0+00 8 .. 5 1 8
0 1 8 ... 2
38 5 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 .... ) .. 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5.,2
0 9 5 .. 2
0 9 5.,2
.. 0 9 5 .. 2
0 9 5 .. 2
.,0 9 5 .. 2
.. 0 9 5102
.0 9 5 2
eO 9 5 2
0 5 .. 2 .. o 5 2
.. 0 1 .5 .. 2
,.0 1 8 .. 3 RB
0 0 1 8 .. 5
8 0 1 8.,5 ,o 6.,3 LWE
0 5 .. 2
0 5.2
.0 5 .. 2
0 5 .. 2
110 0 10 5 .. 2
.. 0 5.2
.. 0 10 5 "" ./,.
.o 5.,2
.. o 5.,2
0 5.2
.. o 6 2
.. 0 6 ..
cO 1
.. 0 1 8 .. 3
s 0.0 1 8 4 LB
1 .. 5 1 8 ..
.0 1 8 .. 4
0 6 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1 .. )
cover data at
ic'n Dis
_____ ..,., __ , ___ _,... ___ ------
3
el
---
10
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
1
9
, subs rate and
Cov s _....,. ______
5~
5o2
5 ..
5 ..
5 2
5
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5 .. 2
5
5
5 .. 2
5.2
2
5
8 RB
6 ..
6 .. 2
6~2
Il
6,3 LHE
--·---·-·-·---·---~------·----·---·----·--~·----,=-~4----·--·-~---------------~------
Table .,8 (cont.) s section elevations, substrate and
5
cover data site .IL~
311.0
9
9
9
6.,3
6.,3
3
6 3
6
6,3
6"3
6 .. 3
1 8.,2
1 5
1 5
6 ., 3 LB LI.'"'"""'-~>IJ
6 .. 3
6 3
o3
6 .. 3
3
3
6 3
12 6 .. 3
12 6 3
6
6.3
6 3
6 3 RWE
6,3
6.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1
le .. 1
ion
Site
1
IFG-4 l
site .. 2R ..
0 .. 0
.o
8.0
ion velocities (ft
loci ties
at
2 '9 cfs
0~00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
1 ..
2 .. 20
00
2
2 ..
2 .. 40
at
le
1
.. ) I 1.
site . 2R ..
0
.,0
.. 0
0
0
0
0
0
eO
.. 0
218.,0
249 5
.. 0
on velocities t ec) at
ocities
s 2
0.00
--------~--,--------------------.. ----------,------·-------------·---------
Table B-3.1 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 101 .. 2R ..
te
Hor
Dist
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
0
.. 0
.. 0
. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 5
90 .. 0
.. 0
.0
.,0
.. 0
.. 0
114 .. 0
116.,0
1 .. 0
1 .. 0
1 .,0
$0
.. 0
0
0
.. 0
.. 0
• 0
.0
.o
Velocities
at
219 cfs
0~03
0.,03
0.05
0 .. 05
0 ..
0 .. 05
0<>05
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0.90
1 .. 00
1.,
1.,
1.,
1 .. 75
2.05
2~00
2 ..
2 35
e35
2 .. 35
2
2G
2.
2.30
2 30
Vel ties
at
2~ cfs
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
(., .. 00
0.
0 .. 00
0.,00
0.00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 ..
0,20
0.25
0 ..
Oe59
0 59
0~
0 54
Oc59
0.
0
0.
0 .
0~
0
0 .
0
0 .
0.,
0
0
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table B-3til (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities
Sl 101 ..
Hor oc:ities
Location Dist
Site (ft) 9c
-·----------------_......,._._. ______
3 156 .. 0 2.,
1 .. 0 1
160 .. 0 1.,
.. 0 2.
.. 0 .,30
.0 2.,
168 .. 0 2.,
170 .. 0 2.,30
1 .. 0
1 .. 0 2.,20
1 .. 0 2
1 .,0 2.,
.0 2.,
.0 1.,
.. 0 lc70
.. 0 1,.
.0 1 .. 60
.. 5 1
.,0 1 c
0 1
0 0.95
.0 0.,
.. 0 0.,55
2 • 0 0 .
216.0 0 .. 10
Qo 0 10
.. 0 0.,
"0 0 .. 00
uO 0 ..
.. 0 0
"0
.. 0 0,
Oo
0., 10
0.
0 00
0 .. 00
l ties
'")£::, J.-
_ __ ,,, ___ 1 ... ____
0 ..
0 .. 55
0 .. 50
0 50
Oe '•5
Oe
0 ..
0 35
0 .. 30
0 .
0 ..
0.,
0., 15
0 .. 10
0 .
0.
0.00
0 .. 00
Oo
0 .. 00
0
0.,
0 ..
0 ..
0~00
0 .. 00
0.
0 .. 00
0 00
0
0
0.
0 ..
0~00
0
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 ..
l.
site .. 2R.
(ft)
.o
"0
1 0
0
.. 0
163 .. 0
.0
.. 0
ion ocities s
0 ..
0 ..
at
0 00
0.
0
0
0.,
0
0
0,.
0 ..
0'"
0
0 ..
0 ..
• 70
0
0
0,
0 ..
0 ..
le
ion
Site
--~....el.l>-~-----
.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities
site 101 .. 2R ..
• +-•
OCl.t.leS
at
2+9 ------__ ._..,. _______
~0 1 c
,.Q 1,50
.. 0 1 .. 61
.. 0 1
.. 0 1 ..
0
.. 0
.,0
238 .. 0 1.,
.. 0 1 ..
.. 0 1.,10
. o 0.,
1 .. 0
.0
,..0
.. 0
.. 2
1.0
.. 0
eO 0 ..
0 0 00
7 .. 0 Oe
0 0
1 a 0 0 ..
.. 0 0~
.0 0 ..
.0 0
413 0 0.
oO 0.,
419~0 0 ..
~0
.. 0
0
50
.. 0
0 , ...
~0
.. 0
s at
l ties
5 cfs
---------~---
Oc
0
0~1
0.,
0~.20
0
0
0.
0,,.
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0
0
0 00
0 00
0 ..
0
0.,
0
0
0.,
0
0.,,
0 .. ,
0
0
0 ..
0
0.,
0 ..
0 ..
0
0
0 ..
0
0
0
e ., 1
1on
te
.) I 1
site .. 2R ..
.0
.. 0
88.0
.. o
.. 0
.. 0
0
. 0
104.0
.. 0
.. 0
~0
0
124 .. 0
.. 0
.-0
.0
0
ion velocities t/sec) at
loci ties
1.80
1~95
1
2
ities
0"'00
0.00
o .
0 •
0 ..
Oe
0 ..
()
0 .
0
0
0 ..
0
le B-3.1 ont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities
site 101.2R
Hor ocities
Location st
te (ft) 219 cfs
..... -------~--------._._,.._.,....,. ____ ,.... __
160 .. 0 1.-
• o lo30
.. 0 1.50
.. 0 1.,
. o 1,
.. 0 leJ5
.. 0 1 45
,5 1.,
.. 0 1Q50
.. 0 le
0
~0 1 .. 45
.,0 le
.. 0 1.,
194 .. 0
.. 0 0 ..
.o 0 ..
~0 0
0
211 .. 5 0.,
.,5 0 ..
250.,0 0 .. 00
,.0 0 ..
• 0 0 ..
.,0
,0 0"
~0 0.,
.. 0 0
oO
.,0
.. 0
Oe 0
0 ..
0"
t/sec) at
ocities
2~5 c:fs
---11>---~~----
o.
0 ..
0.,40
0 •
0 ..
0.,35
0 ..
0 .. 10
0.,
0 00
0 .. 00
0
0 .. 00
0.:00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0
0 .. 00
0.,00
0 ..
0 ..
0,
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.00
0 ..
0.00
0 .
Oo
0
Table B-3.1 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 101 .. 2R.
ion
Site
Cross Section 7
Station 10+23
(cont *)
Hor
Dist
(ft)
.0
.. 0
96 .. 0
.0
jQQ .. O
102 .. 0
104 .. 0
1 .. 0
108 .. 0
!10 .. 0
1 .. 0
114 .. 0
115 .. 0
116 .. 0
1 .0
1 .. 0
.. 0
.0
. o
.. 0
.. 0
132 .. 0
.0
136 0
1 .. 0
141;o0
.. 0
144 .. 0
~0
1.0
~0
cO
.0
.. 0
0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
Velocities
at
2-19 cfs
0 .. 70
0 ..
0.,
Oe
0 77
0.,
0 ..
0 .. 73
0.,
0 .. 83
0 ..
0.75
0.66
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 79
0
0 ..
0.,90
0 ..
0 .. 84
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
1,.03
1 .. 06
1 .. 10
0 ..
0
Velocities
at
2'5 cf~~
0 .. 00
0.,00
0~. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 12
0 12
0 ..
0 .. 15
0 ..
0 15
0 .. 18
0 .. 11
0 05
0 .. 05
0 ..
0 .. 08
0 ..
0., 10
0 ..
0
0 .. 10
0., 10
0
0
0 1'~
0.,, 16
0 15
0 .. 12
0 15
0 ..
0
0 .. 13
0 10
0 12
0 10
0~ 10
0 10
0 10
0 10
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- 3
le .) ion oci ies t ec) at
site
1 ies
l at
S te 2
7 0
0 .. 10
-------------------------------------------------------------
on
s
213.5
1. 5
0
t es
ocit es
B 5
a.t
25 c
10
0 10
0.15
0,.
0.15
0.15
0
0,.
.10
0.10
0 ..
0.
0 .. 28
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 30
0.
0 ..
0~
0 ..
0, •
. 10
0 .. 10
0 ..
0
0.,
0.
o.
0
e .. 1
ion
72.0
132 ..
160 .. 0
. o
t ocit
2
2
2 .. 11
.11
1 ..
1
t
.. )
168$0
1 .o
174~0
l .o
0
0
.0
0
2
oeities
at
0.45
es
oci
at
0.00
0 .
es
.._ __ ~....,. .... ~,-.... --_.._,-....... ..,-~~--ca-~4illl::llt~'llll!lll>"-------..... --,..,...--..----------~---......... _.....,._~-------------
B
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2 I i t
site 31:1
Velocities ocit es loci ties loci ties
'1.. t.,t.Oln at
ll Si e 18 c: __ ._.,_..,... __ ......,..._. ___ .
--~-.......... -----------------------·--------------;---~----
1 0<!0 o. 0 .. 0.00 0
1 0 0.00 0 .. o .. oo o .. oo
8 0 0 .. 0 .. 00 0 .. 0.00
.0 0.00 0. 0.00 0~
~0 00 0* 0 .. 00 0.00
.. 0 0.00 0 0~00 0~00
36~0 0 .. 0 Oo 10 0~05
.. 0 0 .. 40 0 .. 0., 0.,10
0 0.50 0 .. 0~20 0.09
48 .. 0 0 .. 60 0 .. 50 0 .. 30 0 .. 15
.,0 0 .. 65 0.,50 0 .. 30 0 .. 15
56.,0 0.75 0.55 0 .. 30 0 .. 10
60 .. 0 0 .. 75 0.,60 0~40 0"
,0 .. 75 0,. 0.,40 0 .. 20
68c0 0.70 0.,68 0~40 0.15
72 .. 0 0~70 0 .. 0 40 0.15
76.0 0 .. 70 0 .. 0~40 0 .. 20
80 .. 0 0 .. 70 0460 0 .. 35 Ou20
.,0 0.,70 0.50 0 .. 30 0 ..
88 .. 0 0 .. 60 0 .. 50 0 .. 20 0 .. 10
.,0 0 .. 70 0.,45 0 .. 20 0.10
96e0 0,70 0.50 0 .. 17 0.,05
100.0 0.65 0 .. 40 0 .. 15 0.06
104.0 0.47 0.38 0.20 0 .. 10
108 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 40 0.17 0 .. 10
1 .. 0 0.47 0 .. 35 0 .. 14 0.05
116 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 37 0 .. 13 0.05
120 .. 0. 0.63 0 .. 37 0" 10 0.05
124 .. 0 0 .. 0.37 0 .. 10 0.05
1 .. 0 0.,63 0 .. 37 Oo 10 0905
132.,0 0.,35 0 .. 30 0.12 0.
136 .. 0 Oa40 0,30 0.10 0 ..
140 .. 0 0 .. 40 0~28 0 .. 10 0 ..
144 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 30 0 .. 10 0.02
1 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 30 0 .. 11 0.02
152 .. 0 0,40 0 .. 32 Oe 10 0 .. 02
156 .. 0 0.50 0 .. 35 0 .. 10 0 .. 02
160 .. 0 0.55 0.,40 0.10 0 .. 02
164 .. 0 0 .. 55 0.50 0 .. 07 0 .. 02
168 .. 0 0~50 c. 0 .. 10 0 .. 02
172 .. 0 0 .. 0 .. 35 o. 0 .. 02
B-78
le
s
(cont.) I ion ocities t ec)
site 131.1L.
Velocities locities ocities locities
at
1 176.0 o ..
180.0 o.
184.0 0 ..
188.0 0 ..
.. o o ..
0 0.50
0 0.50
.. 0 0 .. 60
208 .. 0 0 .. 65
212 .. 0 0 ..
216 .. 0 0 ..
.. 0 o ..
.o 0 ..
.. 0 0 .. 40
• o 0 .. 30
• 0 0.00
• o 0.
.. 0 0 00
251 .. 0 0 .. 00
258 .. 0 0
.. 0 0 ..
0.0 0 ..
1. 0 o.
2.0 0.00
14 .. 0 0 .. 00
• o 0 .. 20
.. 0 0 .. 25
26 .. 0 0 .. 34
30 .. 0 0 ..
.o 0.
.. 0 0 .. .o 0 ..
.. 0 0.45
0 0 .. 40
54 .. 0 0 .. 50
58.0 0 ..
62 .. 0 o.
66 .. 0 0 ..
.0 1.
.. 0 1 0
a.t
1 efs
9
0
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 .. 45
0 45
0.45
0 .. 50
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 .. 35
0 .. 20
00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0~00
0 ..
0
cfs
0
0 ..
0 ..
0.15
0 .. 15
0 .. 15
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.15
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0.05
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 .. 05
0 ..
0~ 10
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.30
0.33
0 .. 45
0.
0.02
0 .. 02
0.00
0~
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
00
0 ..
0 ..
o •
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.
0.
0 ..
0 .
0 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.00
0.
0.12
0.15
0 ..
0 ..
Table B-3.2 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 13L.iL.
Location
thin Site
Cross tion 2
i Oltl 2+45
(cont .. )
Hor Velocities
Dist at
(ft) 240 cfs
78 .. 0
81 .. 0
86o0
90 .. 0
94 .. 0
98o0
102 .. 0
106.,0
110 .. 0
114.0
118.0
122 .. 0
126 .. 0
13090
134 .. 0
138 .. 0
142 .. 0
147 .. 0
150 .. 0
153 .. 0
158.,0
161 .. 0
166 .. 0
169 .. 0
174 .. 0
177.0
182 .. 0
186.0
190 .. 0
194.0
198 .. 0
202 .. 0
206 .. 0
210.0
214.0
218.0
222 .. 0
227 .. 0
231.0
1.70
1 .. 95
2.15
2.25
2.20
2o15
2 .. 00
2 .. 10
2.05
2.10
2 .. 35
2 .. 15
2 .. 25
2 .. 20
1 .. 64
1 .. 65
1 .. 55
1 .. 70
1 .. 75
1"75
1 .. 80
1 .. 65
1 .. 75
1 .. 40
1 .. 20
1 .. 05
1 .. 25
1.30
1 .. 10
1 .. 20
1 .. 15
1.,05
1.,00
0 .. 90
0 .. 65
0 .. 40
0. 10
0.00
locities Velocities Velocities
at at at
150 cfs 55 cfs 18 cfs
B-80
1 .. 60
1~70
1,.96
2 .. 00
2 .. 00
1 .. 85
1~61
1.,76
1 .. 79
1.80
1 .. 80
1.,60
1 .. 50
1,50
lo28
1 ..
1 .. 35
1.,40
le
1.,50
1 .. 60
1 .. 63
0 .. 64
0 .. 63
0 .. 90
0 .. 80
0 .. 75
0 .. 82
1 .. 00
0.87
0 .. 84
0 .. 83
0.,74
0.68
0.68
0 .. 39
0 .. 15
0.00
0.00
0 .. 50
0 .. 50
0.,65
0 .. 75
1.,20
1 .. 20
1 .. 24
1 .. 27
1 .. 29
1.16
1 .. 02
loOO
0 .. 90
1 .. 00
0.,90
0.75
0 .. 87
0 .. 85
0 .. 80
0.,80
Oo38
0~38
0.24
0 .. 24
0 .. 20
0 .. 20
0.20
0 .. 21
0 .. 21
0 .. 28
0 .. 48
0.20
o .. oc
OoOO
OoOO
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.10
0.20
0 ..
0,40
0.35
0.54
Oo58
0 .. 63
0.90
0.65
0 .. 45
0.60
0 .. 58
0.60
0 .. 48
0 .. 41
0 .. 35
0 .. 33
0 .. 32
0 .. 40
0., 15
0 .. 15
OoOO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.,00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
le B-3.2 (cent~) IFG-4 Calibration veloci~ies (ft/sec) at
site 131~/L.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location
Within Site
Cross Section 2
Station 2+45
(cont.)
Cross Section 3
Station 6+45
Hor
Dist
(ft)
Velociti~J Velocities Velocities Velocities
at at at at
240 cfs 150 cfs 55 cfs 18 cfs
----------------------------------------------
235 .. 0
239 .. 0
256.0
301.0
0.0
2.0
15.0
24.0
26.0
28.0
30.0
32 .. 0
34 .. 0
36.0
38 .. 0
40 .. 0
44 .. 0
48 .. 0
52.0
56.0
60 .. 0
64.0
.. 0
72 .. 0
76 .. 0
80.0
.. 0
.0
92.0
.. 0
100.0
104.0
108.0
112 .. 0
116.0
120 .. 0
1 .. 0
128 .. 0
1 .o
1 .o
0.00
o .. oo
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
Oa20
0.20
Oo lQ
o.
0.20
0.20
0 .. 20
0@25
0 .. 27
0 .. 30
0 .. 35
0 .. 35
0.45
0.45
0 .. 55
0.65
0 .. 55
0 .. 70
0.80
0.
1. 00
1 .. 00 o.
0 .. 90
0.90
1 ..
0 .. 00
0.,00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 10
0.10
0 .. 09
0., 15
0.15
0 .. 15
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 .. 20
0 ..
0 .. 25
0~32
0 .. 32
0.39
0.50
0.45
0 .. 50
0.55
0.65
Oo85
Oo75
0.75
0 .. 75
0.85
0.90
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
OoOO
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 02
0 .. 02
0.05
0 .. 05
0(105
0.05
0.10
0 .. 10
0.15
0.10
0 .. 15
0 .. 15
0 .. 14
0 .. 20
0 .. 22
0 .. 26
0.25
0 .. 35
0 .. 40
0 .. 40
0.40
0 .. 40
0.30
0.35
0.30
0.35
0.00
OeOO
0.00
0.00
0.00
o .. oo
0~00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
ODOO
0.00
0 .. 00
~ .. 05
0.05
0.10
0.05
0 .. 05
0,05
0.0"'
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 15
0 .. 10
0 .. 15
0.15
0.10
0.20
0 .. 20
0,.09
0.15
0015
0,, 15
--------------------------------------------------------------·----
B-81
le .2 (cont.) IFG-4 Cali ion ocities /sec) at
site 131 .. 1L ..
Hor
Dist
(ft)
ocities Velocities Velocities loci ties
at ion
s ion 3
S ion 6+45
lcont.)
140.0
144 .. 0
1 .o
.. 0
156 .. 0
160 .. 0
164 0
.,0
172 .. 0
176 .. 0
180.0
184 .. 0
.,0
192 .. 0
196.0
198.,0
. 0
202 .. 0
0 ,o
2 .. 0
2 .. 0
214 .. 0
216.0
2 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
0 .. 0
10 0
7 .. 0
25.,0
oO
.. 0
30.0
32.0
.o
. o
.o
.. 0
at at at
cfs 150 c cfs
1.00
0 ..
0 .. 75
0.77
0 .. 85
0 .. 80
0 ..
0 .. 80
0 .. 65
0.
0.
0 .. 65
0 .. 65
0.,
0 ..
0 .. 45
0 .. 50
0@ 3,
0 ..
ol)
0.,
0.20
0 .. 20
0.00
o .. oo
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
Oo
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 10
0 .. 30
0 ..
0 ..
o.
0 .. 72
0.81
0 .. 85
0.70
0 ..
0 .. 68
0 .. 72
0 .. 70
0 .. 70
0 ..
0 .. 60
0.50
0 ..
09
0 .. 40
0.,35
Oo30
0.
0 .
0 .. 15
0 .. 12
0 .. 10
0 ..
0
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.
0 .. 35
0 ..
o.
0.
0 ..
40
0 .. 40
0.,35
0.,38
0.
0 .. 35
0 .. 35
0 .. 32
o ..
0.
0 .. 10
0 .. 15
0 .. 10
0 ..
0 .. 07
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0
0 .. 00
u.,OO
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.
0 .. 25
0 .. 25
0 ..
0 ..
18
0 .. 15
0,J.7
0
0" 10
0 .. 10
0
0
0 08
Oo07
0.,07
0.
0 .. 00
0.00
0,00
OoOO
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0,.00
0 .. 00
0 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.10
0 ..
0 .. 10
0 .. 15
o.
4
•) I
site
43 .. 0
.. o
48.~0
.. o
.0
.. 0
0
57 .. 0
58 .. 0
60 .. 0
64 .. 0
.. {)
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
92 .. C
96 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
108.0
1 .. 0
1 .. 0
.. 0
.. o
0
130 .. 0
134 .. 0
1 .. 0
.,0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
167 .. 0
171 .. 0
1 .. 0
1 .. 0
ion velocities t at
t ocities 1
0 .. 80
1
1 ..
1 ..
1 ..
1 .. 40
1.
1.
1
1 ..
1
1.
1 ..
1.
0 ..
0.20
30
0 ..
0 ..
1 ..
1 ..
1
1 ..
0 ..
1.00
1 .. 00
0
0
0.
0 ..
0~
0 ..
0 .. 15
0 .. 05
0 ..
0 ..
0
0 ..
0.,
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 70
0 .. 60
0 .. 60
0 ..
0
0 ..
o.
0 ..
o.
0 .. 20
o ..
0 ..
.. 00
0 .. 00
0.
0
0 ..
0.. 0 ..
0.. 0.25
0.. 0 .. 30
Oc 0.,35
0 .. 60 0 ..
0.. 0 ..
0 .. 68
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 43
O .. ltO
0 .. 29
0 .. 14
0 ..
0 ..
o ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 10
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 15
0 15
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 ..
0.03
0 .. 05
05
0 ..
0.00
0 ..
0.00
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 ..
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
-~----~-----------------~---------~--------------------~~~---~~-~~-
le .2 (cont.) 1 ion ve ities ec) at
site 131.1L.
Hor Velocities ocities Velociti~s 1 ties
Dist at at at a,t
(ft) 240 cfs c 55 cfs cfs
....... -~--'-'_._..,......., __ _...,_.., ____
~...._, __ .._...., ... --~-
_,_...., __ ... _____ __.,..,_......,._.....,.......,_....., __ .....,. ____ , _____
Cross 4 216 .. 0 0.00 a 00 G. 0
1. 0 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
283 .. 0 0 .. 00 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
303 .. 0 0.00. 00 0.00 0 .. 00
s S1ection 5 OcO 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0.,00
10n 11+90 4 0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0, 0 .. 00
7 .. 0 0.,00 0 00 0.,00 0 00
9.,0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 00
12 .. 0 0 .. 25 0 .. 20 0.15 J.OO
.. 0 0 .. 0~20 0 15 0.,00
.,0 0,. 0 20 0.15 0 .. 09
22 .. 0 0.,30 0 .. 0.,15 0 .. 09
26.,0 1 .. 05 1 .. 00 0,42 0 .. 20
30 .. 0 1 .. 1 .. 0 .. 43 0 .. 30
34 .. 0 1 .. 35 "15 .. 60 0.,20
38 .. 0 1 .. 40 1 .. 0.,50 0 .. 20 .o 1 .. 65 1 .. 0 .. 65 0 .. 25
46.0 1 .. 55 1 .. 25 0.,60 0 .. 30
50 .. 0 1., 1 .. 0 .. 60 0.30
.. 0 1 .. 1 .. 60 0 .. 60 0.30
.. 0 1 .. 20 0 88 0,43 0 .. 25
62 .. 0 1 .. leOO 0 .. 65 0 .. 30
.. 0 1 .. 40 Oe95 0 .. 60 0 .. 20
70 .. 0 1 .. 45 0 .. 80 0 .. 20 o .. 10
74 .. 0 1 .. 35 0 .. 75 0 .. 15 0 .. 10
78 .. 0 1 .. 10 0 .. 40 0.00 0 .. 00
82 .. 0 0.90 0 .. 45 0.10 0.,00
86 .. 0 0 .. 90 0.,45 0.,00 0 .. 00
.. 0 0 .. 93 0.,50 0.00 0.,00
.. 0 0 .. 0 .. 50 0 .. 0 .. 00
.. 0 0,.95 0 50 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
.. 0 0 .. 0~4J 0 .. 00 0~00
106 .. 0 'Jo60 0 .. 30 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
110.0 0~65 0 .. 35 0 .. 00 0.00
114 .. 0 0.48 0 .. 30 0.00 0 .. 00
1 .. 0 0 .. 50 0.30 0.00 0.00
.. 0 0 .. 45 0 .. 20 0.00 0 .. 00
126 .. 0 0 .. 0 .. 20 0.00 0 .. 00
130.0 0 .. 50 0 .. 00 OaOO .o 0.60 0.00 0.
B-84
le 2 .) Calibration velocities t sec) at
site 131 L ..
Hor
t
(f
ion 5 138.0
11 142 .. 0
146.0
150 .. 0
154 .. 0
156.0
276 .. 0
380.0
391.0
Cross tion 6 0.0
ion 16+30 1.0
11.0
14.0
17~0
20 .. 0
22 .. 0
26 .. 0
30 .. 0
34.0
37 .. 0
42.0
46.0
50.0
54 .. 0
.. 0
62.0
66 .. 0
70 .. 0
74 .. 0
.. 0
.0
86.0
90 .. 0
92 .. 0
~0
.. 0
1 .0
106 .. 0
110 .. 0
114.0
loci ties
cfs
0 .. 40
0.30
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.65
1.20
1.,60
1 .. 90
2 .. 05
2 .. 00
1 ..
1 .. 95
1 .. 75
1 .. 70
1 .. 70
1 .. 50
1 .. 50
1.35
1.13
1.12
1 .. 15
1 .. 00
0 .. 95
1"
0.94
1 .. 20
1.20
1 .. 10
0 .. 95
0 ..
0 ..
o.
ocities ocities Velocities
at at at
cfs 55 cfs 18 cfs
0.00
0, .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
00
o.oo
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 50
1 ..
1 ..
1 ..
1 .. 90
1 .. 60
1 .. 73
1 .. 67
1 .. 50
1 .. 49
1.37
1.32
1 ..
0 .. 93
0 .. 70
0 .. 84
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0,.
Oe
0.65
0.65
0 .. 55
0 .. 45
0 .. 37
0 .. 30
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
O.Ou
0 .. 00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0 .. 00
OeOO
0 .. 00
0.00
0.,00
0 .. 45
0 .. 53
0 .. 70
le05
0.90
1.00
1.20
1 .. 13
0 .. 92
0 .. 65
0 .. 50
0 .. 60
0.59
0,.48
0.48
0.52
0 ..
0~30
0.33
0 .. 36
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 25
0.40
0 ..
0 .. 60
0 .. 60
0 .. 60
Os40
0.53
0.29
0.30
0 .. 32
0 .. 28
0 .. 28
0 .. 26
0 .. 30
0 .. 25
0 .. 12
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
e .. 2
1.on
te
.)
Di
6 117 .. 0
1 .. 0
,0
1 .o
138.0
~0
.,0
0
~0
.. 0
• 0
74.0
,.0
.. 0
188 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
0
.. 0
.. 0
216 0
.0
.0
.. 0
.. 0
locit es
o.
0 o.
0 ..
0
0
0"
0
0
o .
0 ..
0.
.. 30
1 ..
1.,10
0 .. 90
0
0 ..
0 ..
0
0
0
0 ..
0
0 ..
0.,
.0 0.00
.. 0 0
0 0 ..
.. 0 0
.. 0 0
0 0 ..
.. 0 0 ..
vel t
ties
at
0 .. 00
0 ..
0.,
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0
es
Table B-3.2 (cont.) IFG-4 Cali ration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 131.1L.
Locati~:>n
thin Site
Cross ion 6
Station 16+30
(cont.)
s s~ection 7
1on 19+05
Hor
Dist
(ft)
280.0
284 .. 0
34:t..O
358.0
0 .. 0
2 .. 0
8 .. 0
10 .. 0
14.0
18.0
.. 0
24 .. 0
28 .. 0
32.0
36 .. 0
40 .. 0
44 .. 0
48 .. 0
51 .. 0
54.0
71 .. 0
84.0
.o
92.0
96 .. 0
100 .. 0
104~0
108 .. 0
112.,0
116 .. 0
120 .. 0
.0
128 .. 0
132.0
136 .. 0
140 .. 0
1 ~0
148 .. 0
152.0
oO
Velocities Velocities Velocities Velocities
at at at at
240 cfs 150 cfs 55 cfs 18 cfs
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.07
Oa
0 .
0.07
O .. Oi
0.07
0 .. 07
0 .. 07
0 .. 07
0 .. 07
0 .. 07
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.40
0.90
1 .. 30
1.50
1 .. 60
1.50
1.55
1 .. 40
1 .. 60
1 .. 20
1 .. 50
1 .. 60
2 .. 00
2 .. 00
2,.00
2 ..
2 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.05
0.05
0 .. 05
0 .. 05
0.05
0 .. 05
0.05
o.
0 .. 05
0 .. 05
0 .. 05
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.22
0.70
0.92
1 .. 03
1.13
0 .. 65
0.35
1 .. 00
0 .. 74
0 .. 65
0 .. 50
1 .. 00
1 .. 65
1.65
1.65
1 ..
2 .. 00
2.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 03
0 .. 03
0 .. 03
0.03
0 .. 03
0 .. 03
0.03
0 .. 03
0 .. 03
0 .. 03
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 05
0 .. 20
0.55
0.70
0.30
0 .. 10
0.10
Oo52
0 .. 30
Oa20
0 .. 15
0 .. 55
1 .. 14
1 .. 14
1.13
1 .. 07
1 .. 00
1
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
OcOO
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.
0.14
0 .. 10
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 25
0 .. 00
l. .. OS
0.00
0 .. 10
0.75
0 .. 75
0.70
0 .. 70
0.70
0 ..
Table B-3.2 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 131."1L.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
~~------------------------~-----------------------------------~-----
Locaticu1
Within Site
Cross Se1ction 7
Station 19+05
(cont .. )
Her Velocities Velocities Velocities Velocities
Dist at at at at
(ft) 240 cfs 150 cfs 55 cfs 18 cfs
160 .. 0
164.0
168 .. 0
172 .. 0
176 .. 0
178 .. 0
182 .. 0
186 .. 0
190 .. 0
194 .. 0
198.0
202 .. 0
208QO
212~0
216 .. 0
220.0
224.0
228 .. 0
232.,0
236.,0
240c0
244 .. 0
248 .. 0
254 .. 0
258 .. 0
262 .. 0
266 .. 0
270 .. 0
274 .. 0
278 .. 0
282 .. 0
285.,0
288"0
290.0
294e0
298.0
302 .. 0
305 .. 0
311.0
315 .. 0
3 .o
.. 0
Go
1 .. 0
.. 0
2.30
2 .. 30
2 .. 00
1 .. 80
1 .. 70
1,90
2 .. 30
2o20
1 .. 90
1 .. 70
1.70
leBO
1.,70
1 .. 50
1 .. 40
1.40
1 .. 55
1 .. 60
1 .. 60
1 .. 74
1 e 45
1 .. 16
1 .. 25
1 .. 25
1.25
1 .. ~5
1 .. 35
1 .. 28
1.35
1.06
1.06
0 .. 80
0 .. 80
0 .. 80
Oo45
0 .. 45
0 .. 30
0.35
0 .. 35
0 .. 65
0 .. 65
0 ..
0 .. 45
0.,30
0 .. 20
1 .. 98
1 .. 63
1 .. 56
1 .. 56
1 .. 56
1 .. 70
1,90
2.00
1 ~50
1,05
1 .. 00
1 20
1 .. 41
0 .. 95
1 .. 20
1630
1 ..
1 ~45
1 .. 34
1 .. 30
1 .. 10
0 .. 95
0.90
0.85
0.,72
0.65
0.60
0 .. 65
0.,94
0.95
0 .. 79
Oc60
0 .. 50
Oo40
0.25
0.20
0 .. 10
0.10
0 .. 10
Oo25
0 .. 20
0 ..
Oe
0"
0 .. 12
1 .. 27
1 .. 10
1 .. 30
1 .. 17
1 .. 20
lol8
1 .. 16
1 .. 15
0.90
0 .. 67
Oc57
OslO
OQ36
0 .. 39
0 .. 40
0 .. 50
0 .. 50
0 .. 45
0 .. 40
0"55
0~55
0 .. 35
0,25
0.10
0.24
0.35
0 .. 42
0.35
0.25
0 .. 20
0.10
0 .. 26
0 .. 20
0~10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.,00
0 .. 00
0.00
Oa69
0 .. 59
0 .. 79
0.79
0 .. 80
0.,50
Oo54
0~59
Oa40
0 .. 30
0.10
0., 10
Oc lQ
0., 10
0 .. 35
0 ..
0.15
0 .. 20
0.18
0 .. 00
0.,00
0.,00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0., 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 05
0.,05
0~00
0~.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
Table B-3.2 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 131.1 L.
Hor Velocities Velocities Velocities Velo~cities
Location Dist at at at at
Within Site (ft) 240 cfs 150 cfs 55 cfs 18, cfs
o:li~DJ ........... -............. -<lll'&a __
.... _____ _..., ________ -------------------------------
Cross Section 7 339.0 0 .. 30 0 .. 10 0.00 0 .. 00
Station 19+05 343.0 0.30 0 .. 10 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
(cont .. ) 347 .. 0 0 .. 10 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0.00
351.0 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
355~0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
359e0 0.00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
362 .. 0 0 .. 00 0.00 0 .. 00 0.00
36790 OaOO 0.00 0 .. 00 0.00
414 .. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .. 00
432 .. 0 0.00 0.00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
B-89
le B-3.3 IFG-4 ibration ocities (ft/s at
site .G,L ..
Velocities Velocities
ion Dist at
Site (ft) 141 c:fs _...,.. __________ ---!ICI:IIl--...., __ ..,.,...,.,. ____ ..,.. _...,..,... _______
Cross ion 1 0.0 o .. oo 0.00
io1r1 0+00 8.7 0 .. 00 0.,00
9 .. 0 0900 o.
9 .. 3 0.,00 0 .. 00
9 .. 5 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
10.,0 0 .. 60 0 .. 00
12 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 00
14 .. 0 1 oSO 0 .. 00
16.0 2., 0.,00
18 .. 0 2 .. 20 0 .. 00
20.0 2 .. 20 0 .. 00
.. 0 2.,20 0 .. 95
24.0 2 .. 00 1 .. 15
28 .. 0 2 .. 80 1"
29 .. 0 2.,20 1.,60
31.0 1 .. 1 .. 20
32.0 1 .. 1 .. 30
33.0 10 90 1 .. 50
eO 2 .. 20 1 .. 32
.. 0 2~20 1 .. 10
oO 2,.20 1"
.. 0 10 95 1 .. 10
.. 0 1 .. 60 1 .. 10 .o 1.. 0 .. 90
48 .. 0 1 .. 40 0 .. 50
51 .. 0 1. 0 .. 25
52 .. 0 1" 0 .. 30
oO 1 .. 50 0.65 .o 1 .. 60 0,90
0 1 .. 70 1 .. 50
.. 0 1 .. 70 1 0
.. 0 1 .. 70 1"
64o0 1 .. 50 1"
67 .. 0 l. .. 0 ..
68 .. 0 2 .. 1 .. 10
.. 0 2 .. 1 .. 30
.. 0 1. 1 .. 20
0 1., 0 .. 90
0 1 .. 50 0 .. 50
1. o. o. 0~
-------------------------------------------------------------------
8-90
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 132.G:,L.
LocatioJl'l
Within Site
Cross Se1ction 1
Station 0+00
(cont.)
Cross Se1ction 2
Station 1+24
Hor
Dist
(ft)
------
80 .. 0
83 .. 0
98o0
109.0
0 .. ')
4 .. 0
18 .. 5
31 .. 5
32.0
34.0
36 .. 0
37.0
38.0
40.0
42 .. 0
44 .. 0
46.0
48.0
50.0
.. 0
54 .. 0
56 .. 0
.58 .. 0
60 .. 0
.0
64 .. 0
66.0
68 .. 0
.0
.. 0
.. 0
76 .. 0
eO
eO
.0
.o
.0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
Velocities Velocities
at at
141 cfs 27 cfs
------------------,--
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0.00 0 .. 00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 60 0.20
0 .. 90 0.10
1 .. 20 0 .. 10
1 .. 75 0 .. 32
2 .. 30 0.60
2 .. 50 0 .. 47
2 .. 70 0 .. 95
3.00 1.15
3 .. 30 1 .. 20
3.35 1.,37
3.40 1 .. 30
3 .. 30 1 .. 25
3 .. 20 1 .. 30
3 .. 20 1 .. 05
3 .. 20 0 .. 90
2 .. 85 0<)80
2.50 0 .. 80
1.70 0.50
0 .. 90 0 .. 45
1.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 56 0.00
1.36 0 .. 00
0 .. 21 0.00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 35 0 .. 00
0 .. 0$
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 132.'='L ..
Lc~cati on.
thin Site
Crc1ss Section 2
Sta~tion 1+24
(cCJ~nt .. )
Crc1ss Section 3
Staltion 2+46
Hor
Dist
(ft)
4111110 __ .._. __
96 .. 0
100 .. 0
104 .. 0
111 .. 5
139 .. 0
161 .. 0
0 .. 0
8 .. 5
23.0
23 .. 5
24 .. 0
26 .. 0
28 .. 0
30o0
32.0
34.0
36 .. 0
38 .. 0
40 .. 0
42 .. 0
44 .. 0
46.,0
48 .. 0
50 .. 0
52 .. 0
.:4.0
58 .. 0
62.0
66 .. 0
70.0
74.0
18o0
80e0
82.0
84 .. 0
86.0
88 .. 0
90.0
Velocities Velocities
at
141 cfs ~~7 cfs
----------__ ,. ________
0 .. 40 0 .. 00
0 .. 20 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0,00
0,00 0 .. 00
0.00 0,00
0 .. 00 0~00
0.,00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 OGOO
0 .. 85 0 .. 00
2 .. 20 0,00
2 .. 30 0~00
2.,80 0 .. 64
;;Lao 0.,65
2 .. 80 0 .. 60
2.,80 0.70
3 .. 10 1 .. so
3 .. 20 2.,22
3 .. 30 3 .. 00
3 .. 40 2 .. 00
3 .. 50 1.55
3 .. 30 1 .. 35
2 .. 20 0 .. 50
2o00 0 .. 40
lo80 OeOO
1,60 0 .. 00
0 .. 40 0.00
0.40 0 .. 00
0., 10 0.00
Oo07 0 .. 00
0 .. 85 0,.00
0 .. 90 0.00
0 .. 70 ODOO
Oe80 OoOO
0 .. 50 0.00
0 .. 25 0.00
0 .. 00 0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-92
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 132."L.
Locati~:>n
Within Site
Cross S•ection 3
Station 2+46
(cont.)
Cross s~ection 4
Station 3+90
Hor
Dist
(ft) _...., ____
90.3
95 .. 0
104o4
139 .. 5
0 .. 0
17c6
18 .. 0
20 .. 0
22 .. 0
24 .. 0
30 .. 0
32 .. 0
34.0
36 .. 0
38.0
40 .. 0
42 .. 0
44 .. 0
46 .. 0
48.0
50.0
51.0
53 .. 0
55 .. 0
57 .. 0
.. 0
61 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
eO
70 .. 8
72.0
74 .. 0
76 .. 0
78 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.0
.. 0
Velocities Velocities
at ;at
141 cfs 27 cf.s
-----------____ ,. ___ oil ___
0 .. 00 OoOO
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
1 .. 20 0 .. 00
1 .. 40 0.00
1 .. 80 0 .. 00
2 .. 00 0 .. 00
1.60 0 .. 00
1.70 0 .. 00
1 .. 80 0 .. 00
1 .. 80 OoOO
1 .. 90 0.50
2 .. 00 0 .. 40
1 .. 90 0®40
2 .. 00 0.40
2 .. 10 0 .. 40
2 .. 20 1e00
2 .. 30 1.60
2.40 1 .. 60
2 .. 40 1 .. 70
2 .. 60 1 .. 75
2 .. 40 1 .. 60
2.30 1 .. 60
2.00 1.45
2 .. 00 1 .. 15
1 .. 90 0 .. 90
1 .. 80 0 .. 75
1 .. 60 0 .. 35
1 .. 50 0 .. 70
1 .. 50 o.oo
1.60 oqoo
1.70 o .. oo
1.90 0.00
1 .. 60 0 .. 00
1.40 qoo
0 .. 90 0 .. 00
0 .. 90 0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-93
le B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 ibration vel ties (ft/s at
ion
Site
Section 4
Statiort
(eont .. )
Cross ian 5
Station 11
site 132."L.
st
(ft) ..,.. _____
90.0
92 .. 0
.o
.. 0
98.0
102 .. 0
106.0
110 .. 0
114.0
1 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. o
.. 0
132 .. 0
152.0
162.5
182.0
.. 0
0 .. 0
.. 0
.. 5
.. 0
46 .. 0
.. 0
50.0
.o
.0
.. 0
.. 0
.,0
.o
66.0
68 .. 0
.. 0 .o
.. 0
.o
oO
ocities Veloci ies
at
141 27 ejEs ..__ ... _______ -----------
0.90 () .. 00
0.90 () .. 00
0.,90 0.00
0.,75 O.OG
0 .. 60 OoOO
Oo56 ()0 00
Oo 0 .. 00
o .. 0 .. 00
0~30 0 .. 00
0 .. 0 .. 00
OoOO 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
oqoo 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
Oe 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 OoOO o .. oo 0 .. 00
OoOO 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 05 0.00
0 .. ()1!00 o. ('L.20
1 .. 10 0~35
lcOO 0 .. 40
1 .. 10 0 .. 35
1.,20 0 ..
1 .. 30 0 ..
1 .. 30 o ..
1.,20 0 .. 40
1 .. 0.
1 .. 0 ..
1 0 .. 50
1 0 0,.55
1.00 0 .. 40
0.90 0.40
0.80 0 ..
Oo90 08
-------------------------------------------------------------------
B-94
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 132.bL ..
Hor Velocities Velocities
Locatro:n Dist at at
Within Site (ft) 141 cfs 27 cfs .... -------1-..<llQ!Iiltll-------... AidD .... ~------
_.....,_....., _______
Cross Section 5 86.0 1.00 0.,45
Station .5+11 90.0 0 .. 90 0 .. 37
(cont.) 92.,0 0.80 0 .. 40
94.0 1.00 0.55
98 .. 0 1 .. 20 0.45
102.0 1 .. 15 0.37
104.0 1.10 0.36
106.0 1 .. 00 0.35
110 .. 0 0 .. 90 0.35
114 .. 0 1 .. 00 0.30
116.0 la20 0 .. 40
118 .. 0 l .. CO 0.35
122.0 0 .. 90 0 .. 15
124.0 0 .. 95 0.10
126 .. 0 0.95 0.00
128 .. 0 1 .. 00 0.00
130 .. 0 0.90 0.00
134.0 0 .. 80 0 .. 00
136.0 0.60 0~00
138 .. 0 0 .. 60 0.00
140 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 00
142.0 0 .. 50 0 .. 00
144.0 0 .. 40 0.00
146.0 0 .. 60 0.00
148 .. 0 0 .. 50 0.00
150 .. 0 0.40 0 .. 00
152 .. 0 0.30 0.00
154.0 0.30 0.00
156QO 0 .. 00 0.00
.. 5 0.00 0.00
.. 0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
210 .. 0 o.ou 0 .. 00
Cross Se(:tion 6 0.0 0.00 0.00
Station 6+94 25 .. 0 0 .. 00 0.00
29.,0 0.00 0.00
30.0 0.00 0.00
.. o 0 .. 35 0 .. 00 .o 0.50 0.15
.. 0 0 .. 70 0 .. 15
eO o. o.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
95
Table B-3 .. 3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibratior1 velocities (ft/se(:) lat
site 132."L,.
------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~~~-----._. __________________ , ___ ..., ________ ...,.. _______________ ..... __ ,., _______ _
Hor Velocities Velloc.ities
Locat~on Dist at at
Withil'll Site (ft) 141 cfs 27 4:::fs
------~~--..... --___ ,_..,. ___ ----·------.___ .... ___ ,.1 _____
Cross Section 6 42 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 10
Statio~n 6+94 44.,0 0 .. 90 0 .. 20
(cont .. ) 46e0 0 .. 90 0 .. 25
50 .. 0 0 .. 80 0 .. 30
54 0 0 .. 85 0 .. 30
56 .. 0 1 .. 00 0 .. 30 .o 1 .. 00 0 .. 30
62.,0 Og93 0 .. 30
66 .. 0 1 .. 00 0 .. 30
68.0 0.,90 0 .. 31
70 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 32
72 .. 5 0.,90 0 .. 29
74 .. 0 0.,90 0 .. 30
76 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 30
78QO 0.,90 0 .. 30
ao .. o Oe85 0 .. 30
82.0 0 .. 90 0 .. 27
84 .. 0 Oo90 0 .. 30
86 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 30
88 .. 0 0 .. 90 OoJO
90 .. 0 Oc90 0 .. 30
92 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 30
94 .. 0 0 .. 90 0.20
96 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 20
98.0 0 .. 80 0 .. 20
100.0 0.80 0 .. 15
102 .. 0 0 .. 80 0 .. 15
104 .. 0 0 .. 80 0.,00
106 .. 0 0,60 0 .. 00
1Q8 .. 0 0 .. 50 0 .. 00
110.0 0 .. 40 1 .. 00
112.0 0 .. 40 0 .. 00
114 .. 0 0 .. 30 0 .. 00
116 .. 0 0 .. 30 0 .. 00
1 .. o 0 .. 10 0.00
120 .. 0 0,00 0 .. 00
122 .. 0 0 00 0.00
124 .. 0 OoOO 0 .. 00
139 .. 0 OoOO o.oo .o 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
1 .. 5 0.00 0 .. 00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
9ti
le .3 (cont.) IFG-4 Cal
site 132.
ion
Site
Hor
st
(ft)
.. 0
.. 6
.. 5
24 .. 0
.. 0
28 .. 0
30 .. 0
.0
.. 0
36 .. 0
40 .. 0
0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
60 .. 0
.. o
.o
66 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
74.0
.. 0
.. 0
80 .. 0
.. 0
84.0
86 .. 0
.. 0
90 0
92.0
. o
.. 0
.. 0
100 .. 0
.. 0
ion velocities
ocit
at
--..-.---.---=lll:llfl-
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 40
0 .. 20
0 .. 30
o.
0 .. 60
0 .. 60
0 ..
0 .. 65
0 .. 70
0 ..
0 ..
1 .. 10
04
1 ..
1.10
1.00
1.00
1 ..
1.00
1 ..
1 ..
11$00
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 60
0 ..
0.60
0 .. 50
0 ..
0 ..
0.50
0 .. 35
0 .. 30
0 ..
at
loeities
at
----------
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
o.
0.
.. 15
01 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 40
0 ..
0"
0 ..
o •
0~
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 20
0.20
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0 ..
o.
0.
0 ..
o .
0 ..
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities Is
L.ocation
thia~ Site
Section 7
Sta.ti'01n 8+52
(cont.)
Cross Section 8
Statio~n 9+79
site 132.bL ..
Hor
Dist
(ft)
..... ..,......,. __ ,.,....,
104 .. 0
106 .. 0
108 .. 0
116.0
121 .. 5
131 .. 5
145.0
168 .. 5
0 .. 0
18 .. 0
20 .. 0
.. 0
22 .. 0
.. 0
26 .. 0
.. 0
31 .. 0
32,.0
.. 0
.. 0
39~0
oO
43 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
51 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
67 .. 0
.. 0
72 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
$0
.. 0
.. 0
. 0
Velocities Velocities
at
141 cfs c:fs -..... ------~10-----···----------
0 .. 0 ..
0 .. 10 0 .. 00
00 0 .. 00
0¢00 0.00
0.,00 0 ..
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0,00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.,00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0~00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0., 10 0 .. 00
0 .. 0 .. 01
0 .. 30 0 .. 01
0 .. 40 0.05
0 .. 50 10
0.,50 0.10
0 .. 60 0 .. 10
0,70 0.,10
0 .. 60 Oc 10
0 .. 60 0 .. 10
0,.60 0 ..
60 0 .. 20
0 .. 60 0 .. 20
0 .. 5u 0,.15
0 .. 60 0 .. 20
0 .. 65 0 .. 25
0 .. 70 0.25
0 .. 0 ..
0 .. 0.,20
0. 0 ..
0. 0 ..
1 .. 20 0 .
1 .. 30 0 .. 35
1 .. 0 .. 35
1 .. 40 0 .. 30
1 .. 30 0 .. 30
1 .. 30 0 ..
1 .. 0~
----------------------------~--------------------------------------
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration ?elocities (ft/sec) at
site 132.'-'L.
Locati<>n
thin Site
Cross SEu:tiou 8
Station 9+79
f~ont .. )
Cross s~~ction 9
ion 1 1
Hor
Dist
(ft)
..................... ...-.
88.0
91.0
92.0
95 .. 0
96 .. 0
98.0
99.0
100.0
102.0
103 .. 0
105 .. 7
128 .. 0
155 .. 0
168 .. 0
178 .. 0
0 .. 0
4 .. 0
6 .. 0
9 .. 0
12 .. 0
0
.. 0
19 .. 0
.o
.. 0
.. 0
34.0
36 .. 0
40 .. 0
.0
eO
.s
.. 8
92 .. 0
.0
96.0
c;o
100.0
103 .. 0
.. 0
Velocities Velo1:i ties
at at
11-tl cfs 27 cf:s -----------_____ , ___ ,., ___
1.20 0.60
1 .. 00 0,.60
0 .. 80 0,.50
0 .. 80 0.50
0 .. 60 0 .. 30
0 .. 60 0.30
0 .. 50 OD25
0.40 0.20
0.30 0 .. 15
0 .. 20 0 .. 10
0.10 0.00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0.00
0.00 0 .. 00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 27 0 .. 07
0 .. 54 0 .. 07 o. 0 .. 07
0 .. 45 0.12
0 .. 35 0 .. 10
0 .. 20 0 .. 05
0 .. 00 0~~00
0.00 o.oc
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0.00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 00 0.00
0 .. 00 0 .. 00
0 .. 39 0.00
1 .. 20 0 .. 00
1 .. 80 0 .. 00
1 .. 60 0 .. 25
2 .. 55 0 .. 35
2 .. 40 0 .. 80
1 .. 80 0.77
------------------·---------------------~-------~------------·----~-
Table B-3.3 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site ·"L ..
Velocities Velocities
Location at at
thin Site efs 27 cfs
-------·----............. -......... --.---~-----
__ Gall _______
s S4!:<:tion 9 112 .. 0 1 .. 60 0.,77
ion 11+31 116 .. 0 1 .. 10 0.56
(cont.) 120 .. 0 1 .. 00 0 .. 54
.. 0 1 .. 00 0 ..
oO 1 .. 70 0.,
.. 0 1 .. 20 0 .. 00
.. 0 2o30 0 .. 00
134 .. 0 2e50 0,40
136 .. 0 2o50 0 .. 55
140 .. 0 3 .. 00 1 .. 20
1 .. 0 2c 1 .. 20
144.,0 3., 1.
.,0 3., 1 ..
.,0 3.,70 1 ..
.. 0 2.,45 0 .. 80
158o5 2 .. 00 0 .. 40
164.0 0 .. 96 0 .. 30
.. 0 lo 0.00
170,6 lo 0 .. 00
176 .. 0 1 .. 0 .. 00
.. 0 1" 0.,
.. 0 0 .. 32 0.,
.. 0 0 .. 00 0 ..
oO 0.00 0 ..
0 0.00 0 ..
.. 5 0 .. 00 0.00 .. o 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
B-1
le B-3 .. 4
ion
Site
Cross Section 1
ion
IFG-4 ibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site .. OL.
t
(ft)
0.0
1.0
9.0
11.0
14 .. 0
16.0
18.0
19.5
.. 0
25 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
• 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
40 .. 0
42.0
170 .o
.0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.0
.0
.. 0
.. 0
. 0
0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
76 .. .1)
.. 7
Velocities Velocities Velocities
265 cfs 153 cfs 81 cfs
0 .. 00
o .. oo
0 .. 00
0.07
0.07
0 .. 07
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0.10
0.40
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 95
1.38
1 .. 54
1 .. 71
1
2 ..
3 .. 80
4 ..
4 ..
4.
4 ..
3.
3 ..
2e
1.81
1.40
1 .. 50
.10
1 ..
1 .. 20
0.
o.
0
l
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 03
0
0 .. 03
0.05
o.os
0.05
0.05
Q,.
o .
o.
0 .. 62
0 .. 78
0.75
0 .. 97
1.20
1.54
1"
2 ..
2 ..
2.00
2 ..
3 ..
3.29
:.30
3 .. 42
3 .. 50
2 .. 90
1.,
1.
1"
1 .. 00
0.95
0.87
0.73
0 ..
·0.
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0 .. 01
0 .. 02
0 .. 02
0 .. 02
0 .. 10
0 ..
0 ..
0 .
0.50
0 .. 50
0 .. 60
0 .. 92
1 .. 04
1.04
1 .. 37
1 ..
1 .. 60
2 .. 00
2 .. 00
2 .. 20
2.30
2.60
2.
2 ..
1 ..
1"
0 .. 95
0 ..
0 60
0 50
0.00
o .. oo
0.00
o.
Table B-3 .. 4
Lc)cation
Within Site
Crc)SS Section 1
St:;ltion 0+00
(CC)nt .. )
Cr()SS Section 2
Station 0+88
s tion 3
ion 1+95
IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 136 .. 0L.
Hor
Dist
(ft)
82 .. 8
88 .. 0
91.5
93 .. 5
0 .. 0
3 .. 0
4 .. 0
17 .. 0
20 .. 0
22 .. 0
24 .. 0
.. 0
28 .. 0
30 .. 0
32 .. 0
34 .. 0
.. 0
38 .. 0
40c0
.. 0
.0
46 .. 0
.. 0
.o
.0
.. 0
.. o
.. 0
.. o
.. 0
.. 0
0
.0
0 .. 0
3 .. 0
9 .. 0
10.0
1 • 0
1 0
Velocities
at
265 efs
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
o.oo
0.00
o.oo
0.00
1.00
1.,00
1 .. 80
1 .. 90
2 .. 00
2.20
2 .. 30
3 .. 00
3 ..
3 ..
4 .. 30
4 .. 30
4 .. 45
4.30
4 .. 20
4.10
3.60
3 .. 00
'lo
o.
0~40
0 .. 00
0~
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 ..
01)
l t
Velocities
at
153 cfs
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.,00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.,00
0 .. 00
1 .. 10
1 .. 50
1 .. 80
2 .. 70
2 .. 80
3.
3o50
3 .. 50
3 .. 50
3 .. 80
3o50
3.95
3 .. 50
3 .. 30
2 .. 50
Oo95
0 .. 50
0 .. 00
o.
0.
0 ..
0.00
0 .. 00
0.10
0.
1,.10
Velocities
at
81 cfs
0 .. 00
0.,00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
Q.,OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 80
1 .. 35
2 .. 20
2.50
2 .. 50
2 .. 45
2 .. 40
2~65
2 .. 65
3 .. 50
3.10
3.00
1 .. 75
0~58
0.20
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0~00
0 ..
00
0.00
0 ..
--··----------------------------------------------------------------
1
Table B-3.4 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 136.0Ls
Location
Within Site
Cross Section 3
Statio:n 1+95
(cont .. )
Cross Section 4 .
St io:n 2+91
Hor
Dist
(ft)
16.0
18.0
20 .. 0
22 .. 0
24 .. 0
26.0
28.0
30 .. 0
32 .. 0
34 .. 0
36 .. 0
38 .. 0
40 .. 0
~0
.o
46.0
.47 .. 5
5.5.0
.0
61 .. 0
.. 0
0.0
2.5
7 .. 5
lOeO
.. 0
.. 5
14 .. 0
16 .. 0
.o
20.0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0 .o
30 .. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.o
. 0
Velocities
at
265 cfs
3 .. 05
3 .. 90
3 ..
3 .. 60
3 .. 74
4 .. 30
4 .. 00
4 .. 07
4 .. 03
4 .. 00
360
3.25
2 .. 90
2 .. 00
0 .. 80
0.10
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.50
1 .. 00
1 .. 00
1.70
1 .. 98
2 .. 20
2 .. 60
2.
2.70
2 .. 70
2.60
2 .. 70
2 .. 90
3 .. 10
3.
2 ..
Velocities
at
153 cfs
1 .. 95
2,.50
2 .. 80
2 .. 80
2 .. 80
3.00
3.10
3 .. 00
2.40
2 .. 80
2.80
3.00
2 .. 50
2.60
1 .. 85
0.30
OaOO
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
O.OG
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Oe50
0.50
0 .. 90
le70
2 .. 00
2 .. 35
2 .. 40
2.40
2 .. 40
2 .. 40
2 .. 50
2.70
2.85
3 .. 00
2.70
Velocities
at
81 cfs
1.05
1 .. 60
1.87
2.12
2 .. 12
2 .. 12
2.10
2 .. 02
1 .. 85
1 .. 82
1 .. 70
1 .. 85
1.87
1 .. 83
1.70
0.15
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0.00
0 .. 00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1 .. 00
2 .. 20
2.15
2.19
2 .. 09
1.92
2.14
2.16
2.20
2 .. 25
2@ 14
---------------------------------·----------------------------------
103
e
ion
Si
.. 4 .. )
4 40 .. 0
0
.. 0 . o
0
.0
oO
.,o
oO
58 .. 0
60 .. 0
62 .. 0
0
.. 0
oO
.. 5
e3
.. 5
5
.5
.. 0
22.,0
.. 0
.. o
.. 0
.. 5
.. 0
.. 0
t>o .. o
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. 0
.. o
Cal ion velocities (ft/sec) at
.. OL ..
3 ..
3 ..
3.20
3 •
2 ..
3f!
3
3.14
1 .. 70
1 .. 54
1.,45
1 .. 00
1 .. 20
1 .. 30
1 ..
1 ..
2 ..
2 ..
2 ..
2
2 ..
2 ..
2
ties
3 .. 00
3.00
2.90
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0.
0 ..
0
1 .. 10
1 ..
L.
1 ..
1 ..
1 ..
1..70
1.65
1 ..
L.
2 .. 25
2 .. 20
2.38
2 .. 20
2
2
2o
1 ..
1 ..
1.,60
0.50
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 .. 00
0 ..
0
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
0 .. 10
0 .. 10
0 .. 15
0 .. 30
0 ..
0 ..
0 ..
Oo
ltt
1 ..
0.82
1 .. 10
0 ..
1 ..
Table B-3.4 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/see) at
site 136.0L ..
Hor Velocities Velocities Velocities
Location Dist at at
thin Site (ft) 265 cfs 153 cfs ~31 c:fs
-~---------_ _...., .......... ...,. __________
----------_ .... _. ..... ,..._.,.. ___
Cross s~~ction S 50.0 2 .. 70 1 .. 75 1.00
ion 4+23 .0 2~40 L~80 1.37
(eont .. ) 54.0 2.05 1 .. 70 1 .. 05
56 .. 0 2 .. 10 1 .. 70 1 .. 03 .o 2 .. 15 1.55 0.
60.0 2 .. 17 1.65 0 .. 75
• 0 2 .. 1 .. 1.10 .o 2 .. 40 1 .. 50 0 .. 90
66 .. 0 2.75 1.50 1.10
68.0 2 .. 1.70 0.95
.0 2.00 1.48 1.05
72.0 1.70 1.30 1 .. 00
74 .. 0 1 .. 40 1 .. 05 0.40
.. 0 1.00 0 .. 50 0 ..
78 .. 0 0 .. 90 0 .. 40 0 .. 18
.. 0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0~00
79.8 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0.00
.. 5 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 O.rOO
83 .. 0 0.00 0.00 0 .. 00
.0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0.00
91.0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00
Cross SEH.:tion 6 0 .. 0 0.00 0 .. 00 0.00
St ion 8.0 o.oo 0.00 0.00
8 .. 5 0 .. 00 0.00 0.00
10 .. 0 0.00 0.00 0 .. 00
11.0 o.oo 0 .. 00 0.00
11.5 0.00 0.00 0.00
12.0 0.00 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 .o 1 .. 00 0 .. 0.00
.0 1.65 1 .. 0.00 .o 1" 1.30 0 .. 60
.. 0 2 .. 1.90 1.
.0 3.10 2 .. 00 1.
t) 3 .. 25 2e20 1 .. 75
~~ .. 0 3 .. 2.50 1 .. 90
3 .. 2. 1 ..
3.35 2 .. 40 1.90
3 .. 2e70 1. 97
3o32 . 2 .. 2 .. 00
1 1.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Table B-3.4 (cont.) IFG-4 Calibration velocities (ft/sec) at
site 136.0L.
Hor Velocities Velocities Velocities
Location st at at
Wi Site (ft) 265 cfs 153 cfs 81 cfs
...... 'ifi'li::al ..... ___ ,._,..., __
_______ .._ _ ________ , __ ... ,.... ________
41!1Jt' ........ ~---------
Cross Section 6 .,o 2o 2o60 2 .. 25
Station 5+82 40 .. 0 2 .. 78 2 .. 20 lc95
(cont.) 42 .. 0 2 .. 69 2 .. 40 1.,70
44"0 2. 2,30 1 .. 60
.0 2 .. 40 1.,90 1 ..
.. 0 2 .. 40 2 .. 05 1 .. 10
50o0 2 .. 30 2.00 1 .. 10
52 .. 0 2 .. 05 lo40 0 .. 90
.. 0 2'004 1 .. 00 0 .. 60
.0 1~90 1.20 0 ..
58.0 lc32 0 .. 80 Oo35
60 .. 0 0 .. 0 .. 00 OcOO
62 .. 0 0 .. 0"00 0 .. 00
.. 3 0 .. 0.,00 0 .. 00
.,0 0.00 0.,00 OoOO
67 .. 0 0 .. 00 0~00 OoOO
68 .. 0 0 .. 00 0 .. 00 OoOO
.. 0 0.00 0 .. 00 o .. oo .. o 0~ OoOO 0 .. 00
81 .. 0 0.00 0 .. 00 0.,00
---------------------------------~---------------------------------
B-1
Tab 1 e B·-4 .1. Comparison between observed and predicted surface
elevations, discharges, and ocities for si 101.2R
hydraulic model.
Streambed Water Surface
Elevation Discharge Velocity
observed Predicted Observed Predicted Adjustment
( ) (ft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) Factor
libration ow 279 cfs
0+00 361.08 361 .. 08 272 .. 6 272.~~ 1.00
3+74 362.60 362 .. 60 270 .. 5 270. ~~ 1.01
5+64 362.98 362.98 272.5 272. :~ .. 99
363.20 363 .. 20 258eQ 257 .. :r .. 99
10+23 363o50 363 .. 50 267.5 267 .. ;~ ..
12+79 363.50 363.50 243.8 243.6 1.
14+62 364 .. 01 364.01 270.5 270.2 1.01
Calibration Flow 25 cfs
0+00 360 .. 07 360 .. 07 25.1 25 .. 1 .. 99
361 .. 83 361 .. 83 26.7 26 .. 7 .98
361.85 361 .. 85 28.9 28.9 .99
• 36 362 .. o5 .5 .96
.95 .45 21 .. 9 21.9 .. 92
12+79 362.45 • 28 4 28.4 1.00
14+62 363.34 .. 34 23 .. 5 23.5 .96
107
Table B·-4 .. 2.. Comparison between observed and predicted water surface
elevations, discharges, and velocities for site 131
hydraulic model ..
Streambed Water Surface
Stati Elevation Discharge Velocity
{)bserved Predicted Observed Predicted Adjustment
(ft) { ) (ft) ( ) (c ) Factor
Calibration Flow 240 cfs
0+00 617.03 617.01 230.,8 240 .. 0 .. 98
617 .. 07 617.05 253 .. 3 239$5 .. 98
6+45 617.61 617 .. 56 221 .. 8 230 .. ~6 .. 97
9+45 617.63 617 .. 56 2?7 .. 5 219 .. 1 .. 99
11+90 618 .. 17 618 .. 242.5 235.,,8 ..
16+30 619 .. 52 619 .. 50 250 .. 8 247.,1 • 98
19+05 620.71 620 .. 69 259.7 257 .. 3 .. 99
Calibration Flow 150 cfs
0+00 616e78 .. 81 156.7 150 .. 9 1.,01
616 .. 91 616.92 160 .. 2 153 .. 7 1 .. 02
617e32 617.35 156.0 15lo6 1 ..
617.28 617o33 137 .. 4 142 .. 0 1 .. 03
11+90 617.77 .82 144 .. 2 147.,9 1.03
16+30 .. 23 619.25 152{15 .. 3 1 .. 02
19+05 620.55 620 .. 151.9 162.0 1.
Calibration ow 55
0+00 616.42 616 .. 57.3 56 .. 1 1 .. 00
616.69 616.69 58 .. 4 56 .. 6 1 .. 04
616 .. .. 97 61.9 58 .. 8 1 .. 03
616586 616, 51 .. 0 .. 4 1 .. 03
617 .. 24 617 .. 26 49.8 52.3 1 .. 04
618 .. 618 .. 74 54.5 54.,5 1.01
620.41 620.39 62.0 57 .. 1 1 .. 01
on ow 18
0+00 616.03 616. 17.9 18 .. 6 "92 616 .. 49 6 .49 18 .. 6 19 .. 5 .,96
6+45 616 .. 67 ll65 20 .. 2 21 .. 5 .. 99
6 .. 62 616.59 19 .. 2 18~8
616 .. 83 616 .. 17 .. 5 17.,3 ..
618 .. 618.30 17.6 17 .. 9 1 .. 00
620 .. 20 .20 17 .. 9 18 .. 8 .. 96
108
le B-4 .. 3. Comparison between observed and predicted water surface
elevations, dischargess and velocities for 132
hydraulic model ..
Streambed Water Surface
Station Elevation Vel ty
Observed Predicted ustment
( ' (ft) (ft) (cfs} ( ~:fs) Factor J
Calibration ow cfs
0+00 626.05 626.05 127.2 127 .. 4 1.00
1+24 626.28 626.28 142 .. 0 142 .. :3 .
2+46 627. .29 145.9 146.:2 1.01
3+90 627 .. 95 627.95 145 .. 2 145.!5 1.02
1 628 .. 10 628 .. 10 140.2 140 .. !5 .97
6+94 628.16 628. 142.4 142.7 ..
628.17 628 .. 17 142.2 142 .. J~ .95
9+79 628 .. 19 628.19 132,.3 132.6 .
11+31 628.43 628 .. 43 142.7 142 .. ~9 1.
Calibration Flow 27 cfs
0+00 625.33 625. 23.1 23 .. 1 1 ..
1+24 . .. 65 27 .. 2 27 .. :2 1 ..
2+46 626 .. 28 626. ..5 26.5 .. 99
3+90 627.23 ., ol 25.1
5+11 627 .. ..41 26.4 26 ..
627 .. 43 627.43 .,0 .o 96
8+52 627.43 " 29.,2 .. 2 .. 87
627. .52 27 .. 6 27 .. 6 .
11+31 628 .. 628o09 26 .. 5 .. 5 .. 92
Table B-4 .. 4. Comparison between obser·ved and cted
elevations, scharges, and velocities fo~ s~
hydraulic •·•ode1.
--------------~---------~-'-
Streambed
Station
(ft)
Water Surface
Elevation
Observed Predicted
(ft) (ft)
Calibration Flow 265 cfs
2+91
4+23
5+82
675 .. 81
675.97
676.39
676 .. 65
677 .. 10
677.53
Calibr'ation Flow 153 cfs
0+00 675.14
0+88 675 .. 31
1+95 675 .. 77
2+91 676 .. 00
4+23 .72
5+82 676 .. 97
ibration Flow 81 cfs
0+00 674 .. 64
C~d8 674 .. 82
1+95 675 .. 31
2+91 675 .. 61
676 .. 33
676 .. 64
675.78
675.94
676.37
676e61
677.,10
677.49
675.18
675 .. 35
675o8Q
676.07
676 .. 72
677 .. 04
.. 62
674 .. 80
675 .. 30
675,.58
676 .. 33
676 .. 61
10
266o4
268.1
274e3
273 .. 0
263oQ
268.4
151 .. 8
158 .. 5
148.7
157 .. 2
156 .. 9
151 .. 4
18 .. 2
87 .. 1
75 .. 8
88 .. 3
78.3
86 .. 6
{cfs)
266i .. 4
261'f>3
212~" 4
270o3
266)~ 9
264.4
151.0
158.,8
150 .. 1
160 .. 1
152~ .. 1
156 .. 2
7SI .. 3
86 .. 9
7S .. 3
871
.. 3
79 .. 3
84 .. 9
ocity
Adjustme
1.0(
9(! .. .
• 9~'
1.,,00
• 9!;
.. 9}
1 ..
1 ..
1 ..
1 ..
,.99
1 .. 00
1 .. 00
1 .. 00
1.
1,00
.99
!CS evaluat1 iltty IF aultc: model ..
UNSYSl
f:J
Si 71 ~5 0 .. 6114 o .. 1 0.., 0 .. alii 0010100 o .. 0 .. 9962
1 . 2R '715 0 o .. 0 .. 6012 0 .. o .. 0 .. 1 0 .. 1212 0 .. 9934
Si 9(J0 0 .. 1 0 .. 01 o. 0 .. 1262 0 .. 0173 0.1 0 .. 9935
131.7L o .. 0 .. 2917 0 .. 0 ... 0186 0 0 .. 0770 0 .. 0100 0 .. 0755 0 .. 9948
Si 6 1 .. 0 .. 5547
132. VE.L o .. 1 "
0 .. 0.. 11 0 ..
0 .. 9 0 .. 1284 0 .. 0171 0 .. 1273 0 .. 9925
0 .. 9291 0.1659 0 .. 0683 0 .. 1511 0.9884
474 1 .. 5189 1-5127 0 .. 0 ..
1 .. VEL 4 1 .. l .. 7 '711 1 ..
number
0"~ P ·-mear'
d D., d P =
serv~lt 1 ons ..
pred1cted values ..
1 .:-1t 1 on o·t· obser"
0 .. 0478 0.9644 0 .. 1701
Oo 0.. 0 .. 1
0 .. 0283 0.1673 0 .. 9087
Om0490 0.1 0 .. 9945
and 1ct values ..
a, b = y·-1 nter"c t and sJ of 1 es r ession between 0 and P ..
=root mean e error, total, systematic and un temat1c ..
1ndex of reement ..
s t:~ e W 1 ~ J m c:1 t t ( 1 1 > ·f t::u·-rJ i s cuss :n on and tJ E~ e t isti.cs ..
3
~"'>. t
'-"'
I
1-
Q.. w
0 2
0 w
1-u
0 w a:: o._
~
f'..)
0
0
,....
u w
U)
' t ......,
~
0
0
_J
w >
0 w r-
~ 0 0 w n:
Q
---,------,--
1 4
4~---------------------------------------~
0
0
([} om
0
2 3
OBSERVED DEPTH (FT) OBSERVED VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
Figure B-2.1 Scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and velocities from the
calibrated IFG-4 hydraulic model at 101~2R.
4
0
0
...J w >
...,..a
w
0
I
-+oJ
!If-
Figure B-2.2
• •••
100 100 I I
DISTANCE FROM
• Observed11 cfs
o Observed, 4500 cfs
Predicted
Water Surfoc e E ·ievotion
\J'~..:-t· oU.' Streambed · "1'\oO
0
0
0
0
300 400
I I
LEFT BANK HEADPIN (feet)
Comparison of observed velocities and velocities predicted by low flow
IFG-2 model at site 101.5L, cross section 5.
500
I
-0 a>
~ .....:
~
u
0
_J w
OJ >
i
i-l
ii-I
+:;.
-375 ~ .....
Figure B-2.3
DISTANCE FROM LEFT
• Observed, 1696 cfs
o Observed. 4500 cfs
Predicted
~ Water Surface E lavation
\l·u··&'>u: Streambed · ;,'1'\oO
••• ••
300 400
I I
BANK HEADPIN (feet>
500
I
Comparison of observed velocities and velocities predicted by high flow
IFG-2 model at site 101.5L, cross section 5.
• 355
7 0 4820 cfs
6 v Water Surface Elevation
a·o . . .... Streambed
5
4
>-
t-
3
00
2 0
00
rfJ
0
oo
0
0
OJ
t
1-'-d
1-1
U1
DISTANCE FROM LEFT BANK HEADPIN (feet)
-465 0..:
"0--
z 460 0
1-
<[ > w 455
_J
w
w 450 :::>
0:: ..._
445
6
-0 5 Q)
tn
'
4
)-
u 3
0
..J
UJ 2 >
0
465 -
DISTANCE OM L BANK
•
0
o:~r· . (.)'
IN
Observed, 5 cfs
Water Surface E I evat1 on
Stream
(feet>
6
5
2
0
w 510
UJ
DISTANCE F
' 71 • 16
1090 c
Elevation
(feet)
4r
J
,,........_
t ......,
I
t-
(l w
0 2
0 0 w
1-0
0
0 w
IX
Q_
OJ
I
I-I
~
OJ
0
0
Jj
0
,-.,. J 0 u w
(fl
' 0 .._
l.i. .......
~
0
0
_j
w >
0 w
..... y
0 w
0:: n.
0
2 3 4 0
OBSERVED DEPTH (FT)
2
OBSERVED VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
Scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and velocities from the
calibrated IFG-4 hydraulic model at 13lu7L. The diagonal line in each
plot represents a one-to-one relationship.
3
I
f-
tl w
0
0 w
1-
0
5 w c.r
(t
~
\.0
3-r--------~-------·---------------------------4~----------------------------------------~
2 -
0
0
r.. u w 3
(/)
' .._
lL
'-'
0 ~
0
0
_J 2
0 w >
0 w
1-
~
Q w
0.:
0.
2 3
OBSEF<VED DEPTH (FT) OBSERVED VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
Figure B-2.8 Scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and velocities from the·~:-~.-~;;.
calibrated IFG-4 hydraulic model at 132.6L. The diagonal line in each
plot represents a one-to~one relationship.
:) ..
I
I~ 2 (L
IJJ
0
0
IJJ
I~
~~
0 w
CL
Ct
0
5
A u
ld
(/)
' t ........,
t 3
0
0
..J w >
0 2
ld
1-~
()
hJ
0: n. 1 0 0
2 J 0 2
OBSERVED DEPTH (FT) OBSERVED VELOCITY {rT/SEC)
Figure B-2 .. 9 Scatterplots of observed and predicted depths and velocities from the
calibrated IFG~4 hydraulic model at 136~0L. The diagonal line in each
nlnf ~8n~8~on+~ ~· nno-+n-Ano ~a1~+~nn~h~n iJIV\.. 't;pr~.::;p.;:;rP\.<_, U van;;-\.V-Vflt;; IClO\..IVH;;)IIIJ.J•
4
815
810
I
oo 0
o o0 o o
0
0
0
0
0
Elevation
Streambed
~--+---~--~----··1--~----+---~--~---~---+--~~--+---~--~--~--~
01 FROM
Figure B-2.10
T BANK HEADPIN et)
and velocities predicted by high flow
ion 2.
"'""':
0
Q)
U) .......
5
4
w > 3
2
._. 0
820
815
810
805
0
0
Predicted
Surface Elevation
100 200 300
I
DISTANCE FROM L T BANK HEADPIN Cfe
Figure B-2.11 Comparison of observed velocites a velocities predicted by high flow
IFG-2 model at site 147.1L, cross section 2.
400
T le 1 .. Mainstem dischar , site flow and water sur
elev ion (WSEL), wetted ( oss) sur
juvenile ch wei ed us le area (
Site IOl.lR ng curves are not avail
condition (<9, 0 cfs)
versus site flow ratin curve is
22, Low and turbi conditions
assumed r dischar ove 9 2
-----------~~---------~~--~----------------------------4-~--~------
r
-~------~-~-------~----------------~------~-----------------------~--
SITE
{c ) ( )
16
463
720
1092
1
23
1 on ae i 1
2
t
ted as
(
362" 19
362.40
352 ..
3 .. 1
3
3 .62
3
364 .. 03
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.. 00
.. 19
t
as
SURFACE
AREA
(sq. ft I 1000 linea
1 0
2 0 , 1471 .I.
58631 2 5570
70198 112-
83712 26261
90 1 2
0
81
8 22709
1 939 20795
152865 18577
158443 3 17 l
3 17
3 1
3 1
3 1
3 14376
3 13783
3 13218
3 12678
3 121
1 11
3 l 1
3 107 9
3 10320
3 9
3 16
3 141
3 81
3
measurements
surf e area at t t-1
t time t·-is t 0. 98 It
. )
4
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
le .2. nstem dis
elev ion (
juvenile
Site 101.5L ..
criteria were
ow I 2
conditions
i
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-------~-~~---~~-------~----------------------~
{c (c ) ( )
361 ..
,.05
.. 1
.. 36
(s 1
1
1 30
12000
12323
13110
13
15
1 1
1 116
17335
17 0
20 12
20922
21382
21
0
l
1
. )
le 3~ instem discharge, site ow water sur
el ion ( L)t wett ( oss) surface area
juvenile chi wei ed usable area { ) model
Site 112.61. Hi turbidi habitat suit ility
criteria were used for all discharges. The low and hi
ow IFG-2 ls were used to forecast hydraulic
itions below above l0t500 and 11,000 c
respecti y. Surface area values wi i t
of overl are aver of output both
ls ..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 I te
( cfs)
1
1500
1 00
17000
1
1
200
21000
00
0
val .e
{cfs)
l
10
181
310
493
11
12503
133
1 327
152
16282
1 3 9
( )
.. 93
3 .. 55
3371
453
4 .. 00
.. 14
454 .. 28
.42
4 .. 55
.. 81
B-1
s E
(sq. ft. I 1
10
371
318562
1'920
250
3 19
402981
12202
124
442689
453,276
377
125
10
600
477784
1584
484249
486796
489256
491644
493951
496166
983
5 0362
502333
503 9
505493
508227
510083
linear ft.)
76512
72545
69 l
63242
51672
40909
28522
22284
20101
l 12
22461
175
24900
22166
19233
16707
14799
13
11943
10814
10066
·9368
8028
7396
6855
19
5990
5576
5530
5075
le .4. s jsite flow and water surface elevation
L), wetted (gross) surface area and juvenile ino
ed usable area ( ) forecast for Site 119.2R.
and high turbidity conditions were assumed for dischar
below and ove 10,000 cfs. Rating curves were inapplic-
le in the 5-10,000 25-35,000 cfs discharge ran
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS JUVENILE
AREA
{ cf:s) (c ) { ) (sq. ft. I 1000 linear ft.)
5000 56282 1 1 4
56282 1 l 4
5 82 1 1 4
62946 2 14239 2
90 2 233 2
100 0 15 5 .. 83 34430
11000 5 .. 3 93316 368
1 509 .. 23 l 65 38833
l 61 5 9 .. 108515 38365
1 .. 61 111092 33527
1 114256 286
1 117710 23436
1 10 .. 13 122129 1
1 510. 127617 17479
1 51 130593 14588
5 .. 61 1 11345
51 .. 1 254 9960
510 .. 91 16 3 8759 5
511 .. 6 14737 3 7717 5
511 .. 20 152734 3 6811 5
157364 3 6292 5
6000 161177 3 6076 5
2 165091 3 5868 5
2 169108 3 5658 5
2 1 3231 3 5475 5
1 63 3 5290 5
181807 3 5112 5
186267 3 1 5
190845 3 4776 5
1 3 4617 5
200371 3 44 5
1 ce area bas on aerial togr measurements
2 value
3 area at t t calculated as surface area at time t-1
ise 0 l .. 1
4 assumed equal 0 18 .. 6 percent surface area
5 t i e t calculated as sur time t-l raised to
( 2-25, c ) or )
1
le .5. tem dischar , site flow and surface
elevation ( EL), wetted ( oss) surface area and
juvenile chinook wei usable area ( } forecast r
Site 131.71. Hi tu idity itat suit ility
criteria were used for all discharges*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SITE S
L SURFACE
(cfs) (c ) (ft) (sq. ft. I 1000 linear
7 616 .. 10 15 302
13 616. 123973 36623
21 616. 1 671 41588
33 616 .. 71 137546 45776
49 616. 141445 46487
7. 151533 46977 l
11000 617 .. 13 6337 466 1
127 7.26 1 8 47956
166 199945 47491
213 52 212707 45734
2 617. 218480 44188
333 617 .. 76 221802 41630
7 617. 2 003 39721
61 .. 99 12 37451
618 .. 11 231356 35713
618 .. 234829 34628
618.33 238209 3::J964
618 .. 241 2 33771
1117 618, a 32056 2
1 618 153 31863 2
1476 618. 1413 31670 2
1 618 .. 86 254655 31 7 2
1909 618 .. 96 7640 31285 2
2155 619 .. 06 260818 31092 2
3 619 .. 16 263973 30899 2
1 619 .. 26 2 116 30706 2
3028 619.36 0237 30514 ~
33 619 45 273 30321 €"' -3731 619 .. 2 30128 2
4122 619. 27 29935 2
1 61 2 29743 2
1 Int lat value
2 time t calculate as at t t-1 raised to 0 .. 995
Table B-6.6. instem discharge, site flow and water surface eleva-
tion ( L), ted ( ) surface area and juvenile
i ted usable area ( ) forecast for Site
132.6L. and hi t idity conditions are assumed
for discharges below e 10,500 c Rating
curves are inapplicab below 10,500 cfs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c ) ( ) ( ) {sq. ft. I 1 0 linear ft.
0 l 0
6 2 0
2 1 1 2145 2
39165 2 2
78 2 6435 2
92 1 8580 4
10 83 5 92 16528
12 59274 16791
1 ~"/ 626 .. 63544 17214
24 .. 18 57533 17695
.. 30 72391 18219
41 7 18207
53 78605 17264
80215 16508
00 825 14932
190 103 157 13221
000 1 91843 12328
152 .. 03 12
1 .. 12 9 12 11201
217 ~ 1 100202 10602
256 .. 29 102175 10896
300 627 .. 37 104025 10314
9 7 .. 45 107262 9848
.. 52 10~398 9982
0 627., 1115ry6 10300
00 627 .. 115114 10209
30000 627 .. 121236 10028
1 00 7~81 1255 3 9845 5
32000 627 .. 130071 3 9665 5
33 7" 1 8 3 9490 5
8 .. 01 139608 3 9317 5
8s07 144659 3 91 5
1 Su1face ar:ea based on aerial photo aphy measurements
2 In erp 1 1ed v lue
3 s rtace ar1ea at t t calculated as surface area at time t-1
to 1 .. 003
1 t low t i ity forecast just prior to
calcul e as surface area ti e t-1 r ised to
B-1
le instem dis
elev ion {
juvenile chi
Site 136.01 ..
criteria were
, site flow water
L), wetted (
weighted us
t idi it
for all discha s.
area and
) recast r
tabili
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c )
e 1 al
(c )
12
3
53
69
88
110
136
1
1
414
f
\
613 ..
614.
614
61 ..
)
615.02
5 25
615 ..
615 ..
615 ..
ol6 .. 07
616. 5
616
616
61
1 "
6 o07
17 .. 22
617 .. 37
61 .. 1
61
61
617 .. 91
618 ..
618 .. 17
18 .. 30
18
618
618.,
618 .. 7
1
18,.
29
WUA
(sq. ft. I 1000 linear ft.)
6114
5 1
5 5592 1
6 5 1
49043
51636
5 5
53
41
37
4 3350
0 3366
2 3892
61611 3945
3 6
3
3
3
3748
3
3
3817
3918
8
le .. 8.. instem
el ion (
juverJ i le chi
Site 1 .11 ..
to
21,000
area cas
ow I 2 models were
1 c conditi s bdlow
==================================================================== =
(
l
1 0
lfiOOO
18000
19000
) {
1
1
1
1
2
2443
8
9
) ( )
812 ..
813 .. 11
813 .. 31
8 .51
8 3
GROSS
s
{sq. 1000 linear t
4661
9321
09
81
10139