HomeMy WebLinkAboutSuWa20Alaska Resources Library & Information Services
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document
ARLIS Uniform Cover Page
Title:
Quality assurance project plan for baseline water quality monitoring
sampling and analysis activities : for the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric
Project, Water Quality Study, Susitna River, Southcentral Alaska
SuWa 20
Author(s) – Personal:
Author(s) – Corporate:
Prepared by URS Corporation, Tetra Tech, Inc.
AEA-identified category, if specified:
March 01, 2013 Filing
AEA-identified series, if specified:
Series (ARLIS-assigned report number):
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project document number 20
Existing numbers on document:
Published by:
[Anchorage, Alaska : Alaska Energy Authority, 2013]
Date published:
March 2013
Published for:
Prepared for Alaska Energy Authority
Date or date range of report:
Volume and/or Part numbers:
Attachment D
Final or Draft status, as indicated:
Final
Document type:
Pagination:
126, [78] p.
Related work(s):
Cover letter (SuWa 16), Attachments A-C, E (SuWa 17-19, 21)
Pages added/changed by ARLIS:
Added cover letter
Notes:
All reports in the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document series include an ARLIS-
produced cover page and an ARLIS-assigned number for uniformity and citability. All reports
are posted online at http://www.arlis.org/resources/susitna-watana/
March 1, 2013
Ms. Kimberly D. Bose
Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20426
Re: Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 14241-000;
Submittal of Information Related to Study Plan Determination
Dear Secretary Bose:
By letter dated January 17, 2013, Staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission) revised the licensing schedule for the Alaska Energy
Authority’s (AEA) proposed Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No.
14241 (Project).1 Primarily, Commission Staff’s January 17th letter established a process
for its April 1, 2013 issuance of the Study Plan Determination (SPD) for 14 of the
individual study plans included in AEA’s Revised Study Plan (RSP),2 filed with the
Commission on December 14, 2012.3 Leading up to Staff’s April 1 SPD, the January
17th letter required AEA to prepare and file, following consultation with licensing
participants, additional information that Commission Staff have deemed necessary for the
April 1 SPD. The purpose of this filing is to submit the information required by Staff’s
January 17th letter, as well as other relevant information in support of these 14 study
plans.
1 Letter from Jeff C. Wright, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to Wayne Dyok, Alaska Energy
Authority, Project No. 14241-000 (issued Jan. 17, 2013) [hereinafter, “January 17th Letter”].
2 Commission Staff’s January 17th letter established April 1 as the SPD date for 13 of the individual
studies in the RSP. January 17th Letter, Attachment A. When issuing the SPD for the other individual
study plans in the RSP, however, Commission Staff postponed its determination on one additional study
until the April 1, 2013 SPD. Letter from Jeff C. Wright, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to
Wayne Dyok, Alaska Energy Authority, at 3, Project. No. 14241-000 (issued Feb. 1, 2013). In total, the 14
individual studies scheduled for Staff’s April 1st SPD consist of the following: (1) Baseline Water Quality
(RSP 5.5); (2) Water Quality Modeling Study (RSP 5.6); (3) Mercury Assessment and Potential for
Bioaccumulation Study (RSP 5.7); (4) Geomorphology Study (RSP 6.5); (5) Fluvial Geomorphology
Modeling Below Watana Dam Study (RSP 6.6); (6) Groundwater Study (RSP 7.5); (7) Ice Processes in the
Susitna River Study (RSP 7.6); (8) Fish and Aquatics Instream Flow Study (RSP 8.5); (9) Riparian
Instream Flow Study (RSP 8.6); (10) Study of Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Upper Susitna River
(RSP 9.5); (11) Study of Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Middle and Lower Susitna River (RSP
9.6); (12) River Productivity Study (RSP 9.8); (13) Characterization and Mapping of Aquatic Habitats
(RSP 9.9); and (14) Riparian Vegetation Study Downstream of the Proposed Susitna-Watana Dam (RSP
11.6).
3 Revised Study Plan, Project No. 14241-000 (filed Dec. 14, 2012) [hereinafter, “RSP”].
2
As required by Commission Staff’s January 17th letter, AEA hereby submits the
following documents:
Requested Information 4 Attachment
Final implementation plan for Study of
Fish Distribution and Abundance in the
Upper Susitna River (RSP 9.5)
Attachment A, Final Susitna River Fish
Distribution and Abundance
Implementation Plan (March 2013)
Final implementation plan for Study of
Fish Distribution and Abundance in the
Middle and Lower Susitna River (RSP 9.6)
Attachment A, Final Susitna River Fish
Distribution and Abundance
Implementation Plan (March 2013)
Final implementation plan for River
Productivity Study (RSP 9.8)
Attachment B, Final Susitna River
Productivity Study Implementation Plan
(March 2013)
Final focus areas for 2013 middle and
lower river studies
Attachment C, Technical Memorandum,
Selection of Focus Areas and Study Sites in
the Middle and Lower Susitna River for
Instream Flow and Joint Resource Studies
– 2013 and 2014 (March 2013)
As directed in Staff’s January 17th letter, AEA on January 31, 2013, filed drafts of
all these documents with the Commission and distributed them to licensing participants
via its licensing website, http://www.susitna-watanahydro.org/meetings/. Also in
conformance with Staff’s January 17th letter, AEA held technical workgroup (TWG)
meetings on February 14th and 15th “to discuss the study results, proposed
implementation plans, and selected focus areas in the middle and lower Susitna River.”5
Because Staff of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) were unavailable to meet
on February 14-15 due to a preexisting scheduling conflict, AEA met separately with
NMFS on February 7th and 8th to review these materials.
In accordance with Commission Staff’s revised licensing schedule, licensing
participants may file comments on the attached implementation plans and technical
memorandum—as well as the 14 studies subject to Staff’s April 1st RSP6—by March 18,
2013.7 Based on the technical information discussed in the February 7 -8 and 14-15
meetings, AEA has made changes to the attached implementation plans and technical
memo since the drafts of these were filed and distributed on January 31.
AEA also has attached two additional documents related to Commission Staff’s
April 1st SPD. First, based on RSP comments filed by the Alaska Department of
4 See January 17th Letter, Attachment A, at 5.
5 Id.
6 These 14 individual study plans can be found in AEA’s RSP, filed with the Commission on December
14, 2012. See supra note 2. The RSP can be accessed from the Commission’s eLibrary system or AEA’s
licensing website, http://www.susitna-watanahydro.org/type/documents/.
7 See January 17th Letter, Attachment A, at 5.
3
Environmental Conservation (DCE),8 AEA has prepared and included as Attachment D
an updated Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the Baseline Water Quality Study
(RSP 5.5).9 The attached QAPP has been updated to conform with DEC’s Quality
Assurance Plan Review Checklist and Draft Guidance for a Tier 2 Water Quality
Monitoring QAPP.10 Second, as discussed in the meetings with NMFS on February 7-8
and the TWG on February 14-15, AEA has prepared and attached as Attachment E a
response to interim comments submitted by NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service on Characterization and Mapping of Aquatic Habitat Mapping Revised Study
Plan (RSP 9.9), including a comparison table demonstrating that there is no significant
difference between AEA’s habitat classification system and the classification system
promoted by the resource agencies.
As always, AEA appreciates the participation and commitment to this licensing
process demonstrated by Commission Staff, federal and state resource agencies, and
other licensing participants. Following Commission Staff’s April 1st SPD, AEA looks
forward to working with licensing participants and Commission Staff in implementing
the approved studies, which AEA believes will comprehensively investigate and evaluate
the full range of resource issues associated with the proposed Project and support AEA’s
license application, scheduled to be filed with the Commission in 2015.
If you have questions concerning this submission please contact me at
wdyok@aidea.org or (907) 771-3955.
Sincerely,
Wayne Dyok
Project Manager
Alaska Energy Authority
Attachments
cc: Distribution List (w/o Attachments)
8 State of Alaska Resource Agency RSP Comments, Project No. 14241-000, at 3-6 (filed Jan. 18, 2013)
[hereinafter, “DEC RSP Comments”].
9 See RSP § 5, Attachment 5-1.
10 DEC RSP Comments, Attachments 1 & 2.
Attachment D
Quality Assurance Project Plan
FINAL
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
FOR
BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND
ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
for the
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project
Water Quality Study
Susitna River, Southcentral Alaska
March 2013
Alaska Energy Authority
Contract No. AEA-11-025
Prepared for:
Alaska Energy Authority
813 West Northern Lights
Anchorage, AK 99503
Prepared by:
URS/Tetra Tech, Inc.
700 G Street, Suite 500
Anchorage AK, 99501
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 March 2013
A PROJECT MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS
A.1 Title and Approvals:
Title: Quality Assurance Project Plan For Baseline Water Quality Monitoring Sampling and
Analysis Activities for the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Water Quality Study
Date: March 2013
Project Implementation by: Alaska Energy Authority (AEA), URS Corporation (URS), and
Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tt)
Name: Betsy McGregor Environmental Manager Phone: 907-771-3957
Organization Name: Alaska Energy Authority email: bmcgregor@aidea.org
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
Name: Paul Dworian Principal Manager Phone: 907-261-6735
Organization Name: URS Corporation email: paul.dworian@urs.com
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
Name: William Loskutoff Project QA Officer Phone: 907-261-6736
Organization Name: email: bill.loskutoff@urs.com
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
Name: Robert Plotnikoff WQ Technical Lead Phone: 206-728-9655
Organization Name: Tetra Tech email:
robert.plotnikoff@tetratech.com
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
Name: Harry Gibbons TT Project Manager Phone: 206-728-9655
Organization Name: Tetra Tech email: harry.gibbons@tetratech.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 2 March 2013
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
Name: William Ashton DEC DOW Project Manager Phone:
ADEC DOW Program Name: email:
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
Richard Heffern ADEC DOW QA Officer Phone: (907) 465-5305
ADEC DOW WQSAR Program email: richard.heffern@alaska.gov
Signature: ______________________________ Date: ______________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 March 2013
A.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
A PROJECT MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 1
A.1 TITLE AND APPROVALS: .............................................................................................................................. 1
A.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 3
A.3 DISTRIBUTION LIST ............................................................................................................................... 8
A.4 PROJECT TASK/ORGANIZATION .......................................................................................................... 9
A.5 PROBLEM DEFINITION/BACKGROUND AND PROJECT OBJECTIVES .............................................13
A.5.1 Problem Definition ....................................................................................................................................13
A.5.2 Project Background ...................................................................................................................................14
A.5.3 Project Objective(s) ...................................................................................................................................20
A.6 PROJECT/TASK DESCRIPTION AND SCHEDULE .................................................................................20
A.6.1 Project Description....................................................................................................................................20
A.6.2 Project Implementation Schedule ...............................................................................................................23
A.7 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIES AND CRITERIA FOR MEASUREMENT DATA .....................................31
A.7.1 Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)................................................................................................................31
A.7.2 Measurement Quality Objectives (MQOs) ..................................................................................................32
A.8 SPECIAL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS/CERTIFICATION ...................................................................39
A.9 DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS ...............................................................................................................40
B. DATA GENERATION AND ACQUISITION.................................................................................................42
B.1 SAMPLING PROCESS DESIGN (E XPERIMENTAL DESIGN) .......................................................................42
B.1.1 Define Monitoring Objectives(s) and Appropriate Data Quality Objectives ................................................43
B.1.2 Characterize the General Monitoring Location/s ........................................................................................43
B.1.3 Identify the Site-Specific Sample Collection Location(s), Parameters to be Measured and Frequencies of
Collection ..................................................................................................................................................56
B.2 SAMPLING METHOD REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................................................68
B.2.1 Sample Types .............................................................................................................................................68
B.2.2 Sample Containers and Equipment .............................................................................................................68
B.2.3 Sampling Methods .....................................................................................................................................70
B.3 SAMPLE HANDLING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY REQUIREMENTS ..................................................74
B.3.1 Sampling Procedures .................................................................................................................................74
B.3.2 Sample Custody Procedures .......................................................................................................................75
B.3.3 Shipping Requirements ..............................................................................................................................75
B.4 ANALYTICAL METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................................75
B.5 QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................76
B.5.1 Field Quality Control (QC) Measures ........................................................................................................76
B.5.2 Laboratory Quality Control (QC) Measures ...............................................................................................78
B.6 INSTRUMENT/EQUIPMENT TESTING, INSPECTIONAND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS .......80
B.7 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION AND FREQUENCY ..............................................................................81
B.8 INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE OF SUPPLIES AND CONSUMABLES ....................................................82
B.9 DATA ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS (NON-DIRECT MEASUREMENTS) ......................................83
B.10 DATA MANAGEMENT ...........................................................................................................................84
B.10.1 Data Storage and Retention .......................................................................................................................86
C. ASSESSMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................89
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 4 March 2013
C.1 ASSESSMENTS AND RESPONSE ACTIONS .........................................................................................89
C.1.1 High Quality End-Use Tier 2 Monitoring Data ...........................................................................................90
C.2 REVISIONS TO QAPP..............................................................................................................................91
C.3 QA REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT .........................................................................................................92
D. DATA VALIDATION AND USABILITY .......................................................................................................94
D.1 DATA REVIEW, VERIFICATIONAND VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS .............................................94
D.1.1 Data validation ..........................................................................................................................................94
D.1.2 Data Verification and Data Review ............................................................................................................94
D.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION METHODS ...................................................................................94
D.2.1 Validation Methods....................................................................................................................................94
D.2.2 Verification Methods .................................................................................................................................96
D.3 RECONCILIATION WITH USER REQUIREMENTS ..............................................................................99
TABLE OF TABLES
Table 1: QAPP Distribution List .......................................................................................................... 8
Table 2: Project Organizational Responsibilities ................................................................................ 10
Table 3. Reach Segmentation for the Susitna River Basin and Known Data Gaps .............................. 14
Table 4. Alaska State Water Quality Standards for the Protection of Aquatic Life and Wildlife (18
AAC 70, April 2012) ......................................................................................................................... 17
Table 5. Alaska State Water Quality Standards for Toxics and Other Deleterious Organic and
Inorganic Substances (December 2008) ............................................................................................. 18
Table 6. Location of Water Quality Criteria Exceedances in the Susitna River Basin ......................... 19
Table 7. List of Water Quality Parameters to be Measured ................................................................. 22
Table 8. Schedule for the Baseline Water Quality Study Elements and Production of Associated
Deliverables ....................................................................................................................................... 24
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be Collected for Each Water
Quality Monitoring Site. .................................................................................................................... 25
Table 10: Project Measurement Quality Objectives (MQOs) .............................................................. 34
Table 11: Project Training/Certification ............................................................................................. 39
Table 12: Site Location and Rationale ................................................................................................ 44
Table 13: Sediment Sampling Site Locations ..................................................................................... 56
Table 14: Water Quality and Sediment Sample Schedule, Baseline. ................................................... 58
Table 15: Water Quality Sample Schedule, Focus Areas. ................................................................... 65
Table 16: Preservation and Holding Times for the Analysis of Samples ............................................. 68
Table 17: Field Quality Control Sample Requirements....................................................................... 78
Table 18: Field/Laboratory Quality Control Samples ......................................................................... 79
Table 19: Project Assessments ........................................................................................................... 91
Table 20: QA Reports to Management ............................................................................................... 92
Table 21: Data Qualifiers ................................................................................................................... 98
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 5 March 2013
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 6 March 2013
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Organizational Structure ......................................................................................... 12
Figure 2. 2012/2013 Stream Water Quality and Temperature Data Collection Sites for the Susitna-
Watana Hydroelectric Project ............................................................................................................ 47
Figure 3. Map of Focus Area 1— Below Dam ................................................................................... 48
Figure 4. Map of Focus Area 2— MR2 Wide..................................................................................... 49
Figure 5. Map of Focus Area 3— MR2 Narrow ................................................................................. 49
Figure 6. Map of Focus Area 4— Portage Creek ................................................................................ 50
Figure 7. Map of Focus Area 5— Slough 21 ...................................................................................... 51
Figure 8. Map of Focus Area 6— Indian River .................................................................................. 51
Figure 9. Map of Focus Area 7— Slough 11 ...................................................................................... 52
Figure 10. Map of Focus Area 8— Slough 8 ...................................................................................... 53
Figure 11. Map of Focus Area 9— Slough 6A ................................................................................... 54
Figure 12. Map of Focus Area 10— Whiskers Slough........................................................................ 55
Figure 13: Project Data Management Flow Chart ............................................................................... 85
Table of Appendices
Appendix A: Location Maps
Appendix B: Field Forms and Checklists
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 7 March 2013
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AAC Alaska Administrative Code
ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
AEA Alaska Energy Authority
°C degrees Celsius
cm centimeters
DO Dissolved oxygen
DQI Data quality indicators
DQO Data Quality Objectives
EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
g grams
m meter(s)
µS/cm microSiemens per centimeter
mg/L milligrams per liter
MQO measurement quality objectives
NPS Nonpoint source
PDF Portable Document Format
PM Project Manager
PT performance test
QA Quality assurance
QAO Quality Assurance Officer
QAPP Quality assurance project plan
QC Quality control
QCO Quality Control Officer
RPD Relative percent difference
RSD Relative standard deviation
SNTEMP Stream Network Temperature
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
TAH total aromatic hydrocarbons
TAqH total aqueous hydrocarbons
TIR Thermal infrared
TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load
TL Technical Lead
Tt Tetra Tech, Inc.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 8 March 2013
A.3 DISTRIBUTION LIST
This document will be distributed to the following Alaska Energy Authority (AEA), URS Corporation
(URS), Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tt), and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) staff
members who are involved in this project, as well as to all responsible participants including the
selected analytical laboratory.
Table 1: QAPP Distribution List
Name Position Agency/
Company
Division/
Branch/Section
Contact Information
Betsy
McGregor
Project
Manager/Environmental
Manager
AEA Environmental
Branch
Phone: 907-771-3957
Email: bmcgregor@aidea.org
Paul
Dworian
URS Principal Manager URS Geosciences and
Remediation
Services
Phone: 907-261-6735
Email: paul.dworian@urs.com
William
Loskutoff
Project Quality
Assurance Officer
URS Geosciences and
Remediation
Services
Phone: 907-261-6736
Email: william.loskutoff@urs.com
Harry
Gibbons
Tt Project Manager Tt Surface Water
Group
Phone: 206-728-9655
Email: harry.gibbons@tetratech.com
Robert
Plotnikoff
WQ Technical Lead Tt Surface Water
Group
Phone: 206-728-9655
Email:
robert.plotnikoff@tetratech.com
Mark
Vania
URS Project and Field
Operations Manager:
Mark Vania
URS Geosciences and
Remediation
Services
Phone: 907-261-9755
Email: mark.vania@urs.com
Shannon
Brattebo
Sampling Manager Tt Surface Water
Group
Phone: 509-232-4312
Email:
shannon.brattebo@tetratech.com
Charles
Homestead
Lab Manager SGS
North
American,
Inc.
Alaska Division Phone: 907-550-3206
Email: charles.homestead@sgs.com
Dana
Stewart
Data Manager R2
Resources
Data Resources
Management
Phone: (907) 345-6398
Email:dstewart@r2usa.com
William
As hton
Project Manager ADEC Division of
Water/WQSAR
Phone: (907) 269-6283
Email: William.Ashton@alaska.gov
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 9 March 2013
Name Position Agency/
Company
Division/
Branch/Section
Contact Information
Richard
Heffern
QA Officer ADEC Division of
Water/
WQSAR/QA
907-465-5305
richard.heffern@alaska.gov
A.4 PROJECT TASK/ORGANIZATION
The AEA is preparing a License Application that will be submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) for the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (Project). The Project is located on
the Susitna River, an approximately 300 mile long river in the South-central region of Alaska. The
Project’s dam site will be located at River Mile (RM) 184. The results of this study and of other
proposed studies will provide information needed to support the FERC’s National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) analysis for the Project license.
Construction and operation of the Project as described in the Pre-Application Document (PAD, AEA
2011) is expected to change some of the water quality characteristics of the resulting riverine portion
of the drainage downstream of the dam site as well as the inundated area that will become the
reservoir. This study plan outlines the objectives and methods for developing a monitoring program
that will adequately characterize surface water quality, stream temperatures and meteorological data in
the Susitna River within and downstream of the proposed Project area.
This Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) is being prepared to document the quality assurance (QA)
and quality control (QC) measures that will be observed to ensure the following objectives are met:
data are consistent, correct, and complete, with no errors or omissions; QC sample results have been
reviewed and are included; established criteria for QC results are met; measurement quality objectives
have been met, or data qualifiers are properly assigned where necessary; and data specified in the
sampling process design are obtained. Data collection methods will follow established state and federal
(e.g., ADEC, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)) guidelines.
The purpose of this document is to present the QAPP for conducting a baseline water quality study of
the Susitna River.
This QAPP provides general descriptions of the work to be performed to collect in-river data, the
objectives to be met, and the procedures that will be used to ensure that the data are scientifically valid
and defensible and that uncertainty has been reduced to a known and practical minimum. The QAPP
describes procedures used to prepare for the field effort, conduct field sampling using standard
protocols, and post-process field data.
The organizational aspects of a program provide the framework for conducting tasks. The
organizational structure can also facilitate project performance and adherence to QC procedures and
QA requirements. Key project roles are filled by those persons responsible for ensuring the collection
of valid data and the routine assessment of the data for precision and accuracy, as well as the data users
and the person(s) responsible for approving and accepting final products and deliverables. The key
personnel involved in the Baseline Water Quality Study of the Susitna River are listed in Table 2.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 10 March 2013
Table 2: Project Organizational Responsibilities
Position Title Company or
Agency
Division
Branch/Section Responsibilities
Environmental
Manager:
Betsy McGregor
Alaska Energy
Authority
Environmental
Branch
Responsible for project
coordination with local, county,
state, and federal government
officials; and for reviewing drafts of
the study plan, QAPP and summary
data reports
ADEC Project
Manager:
William Ashton
Alaska Department
of Environmental
Conservation
Division of Water Responsible for overall technical
and contractual management of the
project. For permit related
monitoring projects, responsible for
ensuring permittee complies with
permit required water quality
monitoring as specified in the
approved QAPP.
ADEC Water Quality
Assurance Officer:
Richard Heffern
Alaska Department
of Environmental
Conservation
Division of Water Represents the ADEC regulatory
agency and responsible for review
of the Quality Assurance
documentation for each of the water
quality studies. Oversight of the QA
activities ensuring collected data
meets project’s stated data quality
goals
URS Principal
Manager: Paul
Dworian
URS Corporation Geosciences and
Remediation
Services (GRS)
Responsible for directing daily
project activities and tracking
product delivery. Communicates
with AEA Environmental Manager
on project schedule and timing for
product delivery.
URS Project and
Field Operations
Manager: Mark Vania
URS Corporation Geosciences and
Remediation
Services
Responsible for Project
Management of field logistics,
sampling strategies, quality
assurance and quality control of
field protocols. Ensures that all
samples are collected from
scheduled collection sites on a daily
basis. Checks on completion of
field forms and completeness of
field data entries. Ensures that
sample sets are couriered each day
to the laboratory. Also responsible
for organization of URS staff
conducting water quality
monitoring and sampling, quality
assurance and quality control of
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 11 March 2013
Position Title Company or
Agency
Division
Branch/Section Responsibilities
field protocols.
Table 3: Project Organizational Responsibilities (continued)
Position Title Company or
Agency
Division
Branch/Section Responsibilities
URS QA Officer:
William Loskutoff
URS Corporation Geosciences and
Remediation
Services
Quality Assurance Officer that
independently evaluates progress in
implementing the QAPP elements.
URS
Project Chemist
URS Corporation URS Seattle
Analytical
Chemistry Group
Responsible for analytical data
validation and usability
Tt Water Quality
Technical Lead:
Robert Plotnikoff
Tetra Tech, Inc. Surface Water
Group (SWG)
Responsible for preparing the
project QAPP, coordinating and
completing sampling activities,
analyzing project data, and
preparing the draft and final data
reports. Serves as the principal
project team contact for field staff
for the duration of the study
Tt Project Manager:
Harry Gibbons
Tetra Tech, Inc. Surface Water
Group
Responsible for managing the
project, overseeing preparation of
the project QAPP, reviewing
analysis of project data, and review
of the draft and final data reports.
Serves as the principal project team
contact for the technical aspects of
the study
Tt Field Team Lead:
Shannon Brattebo
Tetra Tech, Inc. Surface Water
Group
Responsible for organization and
instructions to Tt staff conducting
water quality and toxics field
sampling, quality assurance and
quality control of field protocols.
Ensure that field forms have data
entries and are completed during
each site visit.
Tt QC Lead: Gene
Welch
Tetra Tech, Inc. Surface Water
Group
Reviews QAPP. Provides technical
assistance on QA/QC issues during
the implementation and assessment
of the project.
Laboratory Manager:
Charles Homestead
SGS North
America, Inc.
Alaska Division Alaska Division Manager for SGS
Laboratory Analytical Services.
Manages laboratory staff that
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 12 March 2013
Position Title Company or
Agency
Division
Branch/Section Responsibilities
provide sample collection materials,
sample handling and chain-of-
custody documentation, and return
of sample results to URS/Tt.
Reports any laboratory errors and
sample condition issues.
Figure 1 describes how each position contributes to the project. The lines of reporting and communication
between project staff are identified.
Figure 1: Project Organizational Structure
Additional technical staff will be responsible for conducting specific tasks during the project (e.g.,
performing field sampling and collecting surface water quality data) at the direction and discretion of
the URS Project Manager of Field Operations and the Tt Project Manager. These Project Managers
(PMs) will supervise the technical staff participating in the project, including implementing the QC
program, completing assigned work on schedule with strict adherence to procedures established in the
approved QAPP, and completing required documentation. The PMs will direct the work of the field
Management Direction
Data Reporting
QA Assessment/Reporting
AEA
Environmental
Manager
URS GRS
Principal
Manager
Tt SWG
Project Manager
Tt SWG
Field Team
Lead
SGS
Laboratory
Manager
URS GRS
Sampling & Analysis
Manager
URS GRS
Project Manager
Field Operations
Tt SWG
Technical Lead
Water Quality
URS GRS
Project QA Officer
Tt SWG
Data Analysis
& Reporting
Tt SWG
QC Lead
URS Project
Chemist
R2 Resources
Data Manager
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 13 March 2013
sampling team including collection, preparation, and shipment of samples and completion of field-
sampling records. To perform the required work effectively and efficiently, the field-sampling team
will include scientific staff with specialization and technical competence in field-sampling activities, as
required to ensure the highest quality data are collected without incident, and experience qualifications
set forth by ADEC. They must perform all work in adherence with the project work plan and QAPP,
including maintenance of field sample documentation. Where applicable, custody procedures are
required to ensure the integrity of the samples with respect to preventing contamination and
maintaining proper sample identification during handling. Where field samples are collected the
sampling team is responsible for the following:
• Receiving, inspecting, and inventorying the sample containers
• Receiving, inspecting, calibrating, and maintaining field instrumentation
• Completing, reviewing, and signing appropriate field records
• Assigning tracking numbers to each sample (sample identification numbers)
• Controlling and monitoring access to samples while in their custody
• Verifying the completeness and accuracy of chain-of-custody documentation
• Initiating shipment and verifying receipt of samples at their appropriate destinations
• Verifying the results of sample measurements collected for compliance with the requirements
of the reference methods, data quality objectives (DQOs) and this QAPP
Additional oversight will be provided by the Tt. QC Lead (QCO), who is responsible for performing
evaluations to ensure that QC is maintained throughout the sampling process, that the data collected
will be of optimal validity and usability, and that limitations of the data set are minimized as much as
is possible given the challenges of the routine field investigation. The QC Lead is a senior technical
staff assigned the responsibility of providing a second-level review of all documentation and records
developed during the sample and data collection process. The QC evaluations will include double-
checking work as it is completed and providing written documentation of these reviews (minimally
initialing and dating documents as they are reviewed) to ensure that the standards set forth in the
QAPP are met or exceeded. The QC Lead may be assigned at the task or subtask level allowing teams
to efficiently divide work processes or tasks required and exchanging project documentation for review
prior to departure from a sampling station. In this regard, QC Leads ensure that all required data and
information are recorded for each sampling station prior to physically leaving the collection site. The
URS QA Lead (QAO), will assign staff, such as technical reviewers and technical editors selected as
needed, will provide peer review oversight on the content of work products and ensure that work
products comply with project QC protocols and the client’s specifications.
Technical staff involved with the program will be responsible for reading and understanding this
QAPP and complying with and adhering to its requirements in executing their assigned tasks relative
to this project.
A.5 PROBLEM DEFINITION/BACKGROUND AND PROJECT OBJECTIVES
A.5.1 Problem Definition
Construction and operation of the Project as described in the Pre-Application Document (PAD, AEA
2011) is expected to change some of the water quality characteristics of the resulting riverine portion
of the drainage downstream of the dam site as well as the inundated area that will become the
reservoir.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 14 March 2013
A.5.2 Project Background
The study area includes the Susitna River within the proposed Watana Reservoir and downstream of
the proposed Watana Dam. Water quality studies will be conducted from river mile 15.1 (Susitna River
above Alexander Creek) to river mile 233.4 (at Oshetna River, just above the upper extent of the
proposed reservoir area) and within select tributaries. The proposed dam would be located at river mile
184.5. The dam would create a reservoir 42.5 miles long and 1 to 2 miles wide, with a normal
reservoir surface area of approximately 23,546 acres and a normal maximum pool elevation of 2,050
feet. The lowermost boundary of the monitoring activity is above the area protected for Beluga whale
activity.
A large-scale assessment of water quality conditions throughout the Susitna drainage has not been
completed. Historical water quality data available for the study area includes water temperature data,
some general water quality data, and limited metals data primarily collected during the 1980s.
Additional data has been recently collected at limited mainstem Susitna sites describing flow, in-situ,
general, and metals parameters by the United States Geological Study (USGS). In 2012, water
temperature data loggers and meteorological stations were installed throughout the Project area. A data
gap analysis was conducted for water quality and sediment transport in 2011 (URS 2011) summarizing
mainstem and tributary data available. Some general observations based on existing data are as
follows:
• Large amounts of data were collected during the 1980s. However, a comprehensive data set for
the Susitna River and tributaries is not available.
• The influence of major tributaries (Chulitna and Talkeetna rivers) on Susitna River water
quality conditions is unknown. There are no monitoring stations in receiving water at these
mainstem locations.
• Continuous temperature data and seasonal water quality data are not available for the Susitna
River mainstem and sloughs potentially used for spawning and rearing habitat.
The following series of tables represent summaries and results from the limited available data from
1975 through 2011 (URS 2011). Table 3 summarizes the existing historical information for the basin
and highlights some of the needs for future monitoring.
Table 3. Reach Segmentation for the Susitna River Basin and Known Data Gaps
Bounds of Reach
(Susitna River Miles)
Reach
Number General Description Water Quality Data Gaps
313 – 184 1
Upper Susitna River,
including headwaters and
tributaries above the
proposed Watana dam
site
1. Surface water and sediment
analysis for metals not
available for mainstem, only
for one tributary.
2. Need to know concentrations
of metals in media and current
water quality conditions to
predict if toxics can be
released in a reservoir
environment.
184 - 150 2 Middle Susitna River and
tributaries through
1. Temperature data is not
available above and below
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 15 March 2013
Bounds of Reach
(Susitna River Miles)
Reach
Number General Description Water Quality Data Gaps
Devil’s Canyon and
below the proposed
Watana Dam site
most tributaries on the
mainstem Susitna River.
2. Overall, very limited surface
water data available for this
reach.
3. Metals monitoring data does
not exist or is limited.
4. Monitoring of mainstem and
sloughs (ambient conditions
and metals) needed for
determining bioaccumulation
potential of juvenile Chinook
and Coho salmon .
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 16 March 2013
Table 3. Reach Segmentation for the Susitna River Basin and Known Data Gaps
(continued)
Bounds of Reach
(Susitna River Miles)
Reach
Number General Description Water Quality Data Gaps
150 – 99 3
Middle Susitna River
and tributaries from the
mouth of Devil’s
Canyon to the Susitna –
Chulitna – Talkeetna
confluence
1. Sources for metals detected at
high concentrations in
mainstem (1 location).
Sampling needs to occur
increasing spatial coverage of
sampling points to provide
adequate representative of
conditions.
2. Current data reflects large
spatial data gaps between
upper reach 1 and the mid- to
lower reach 3 and 4.
3. Monitoring of mainstem and
sloughs needed for juvenile
Chinook and Coho survival.
99 - 0 4
Lower Susitna River
from Susitna – Chulitna
– Talkeetna confluence
to mouth at Cook Inlet
1. Although has the most data
available, most data is old and
most likely does not represent
current conditions.
2. Metals data not available for
mouth of Chulitna River.
Since this tributary has a high
sediment load the metals
content should be monitored.
3. Influence of major tributaries
(Chulitna and Talkeetna
Rivers) on water quality
conditions is unknown. There
are no monitoring stations in
receiving water at these
mainstem locations.
4. Metals data not available for
the Skwentna River or the
Yentna River.
Historical and existing data were compared with conventional (or general) water quality parameters.
Table 4 is a description of the general parameters and water quality standards used to identify where
conditions have exceeded these standards.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 17 March 2013
Table 4. Alaska State Water Quality Standards for the Protection of Aquatic Life
and Wildlife (18 AAC 70, April 2012)
Parameter Criteria
Color
(platinum-
cobalt scale)
Color or apparent color may not reduce the depth of the compensation point for photosynthetic
activity by more than 10% from the seasonally established norm for aquatic life. For all waters
without a seasonally established norm for aquatic life, color or apparent color may not exceed
50 color units or the natural condition, whichever is greater.
Fecal Coliform
Bacteria
Not applicable.
Dissolved
Oxygen
D.O. must be greater than 7 mg/l in waters used by anadromous or resident fish. In no case
may D.O. be less than 5 mg/l to a depth of 20 cm in the interstitial waters of gravel used by
anadromous or resident fish for spawning. For waters not used by anadromous or resident fish,
D.O. must be greater than or equal to 5 mg/l. In no case may D.O. be greater than 17 mg/l. The
concentration of total dissolved gas may not exceed 110% of saturation at any point of sample
collection.
Total
Dissolved
Solids
TDS may not exceed 1,000 mg/l. A concentration of TDS may not be present in water if that
concentration causes or reasonably could be expected to cause an adverse effect to aquatic life.
pH May not be less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5. May not vary more than 0.5 pH unit from natural
conditions.
Temperature May not exceed 20°C at any time. The following maximum temperatures may not be
exceeded, where applicable:
Migration routes 15°C
Spawning areas 13°C
Rearing areas 15°C
Egg & fry incubation 13°C
For all other waters, the weekly average temperature may not exceed site-specific
requirements needed to preserve normal species diversity or to prevent appearance of nuisance
organisms.
Turbidity May not exceed 25 NTU above natural conditions. For all lake waters, may not exceed 5 NTU
above natural conditions.
Historical and existing data were also compared with toxics water quality parameters. Table 5 is a
description of the toxics parameters and standards used to identify where conditions have exceeded
these standards.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 18 March 2013
Table 5. Alaska State Water Quality Standards for Toxics and Other Deleterious
Organic and Inorganic Substances (December 2008)
Parameter Acute Criteria (CMC) Chronic Criteria (CCC)
Aluminum,
Total recoverable
750 µg/L
(1-hr avg)
87 µg/L
(4-day avg)
Ammonia,
(total ammonia
nitrogen in
mg N/l)
1.77 to 28.1
Criteria are pH dependent1
(1-hr avg)
Criteria are pH and temperature
dependent2
(30-day avg)
Arsenic,
dissolved
340 µg/L
(1-hr avg)
150 µg/L
(4-day avg)
Barium No Criteria No Criteria
Cadmium,
dissolved
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(1-hr avg)
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(4-day avg)
Chloride,
dissolved
860,000 µg/L
(1-hr avg)
Applies to dissolved chloride when
associated with sodium.
230,000 µg/L
(4-day avg)
Applies to dissolved chloride when
associated with sodium.
Copper,
dissolved
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(1-hr avg)
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(4-day avg)
Iron No Criteria 1,000 µg/L
Lead,
dissolved
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(1-hr avg)
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(4-day avg)
Manganese No Criteria No Criteria
Mercury,
dissolved
1.4 µg/L
(1-hr avg)
0.77 µg/L
(4-day avg)
Mercury,
Total 1.694 µg/L 0.9081 µg/L
Nickel,
dissolved
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(1-hr avg)
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(4-day avg)
Selenium,
Total recoverable
See Note4
(1-hr avg)
5.0 µg/L
(4-day avg)
Zinc,
dissolved
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(1-hr avg)
Criteria Hardness Dependent3
(4-day avg)
Existing data were used to summarize the reaches of the river where water quality conditions exceeded
criteria (Table 6). This summary of conditions represents limited sampling locations within each of the
river reaches and does not necessarily describe more current water quality conditions as many of the
data were collected during the 1980s studies.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 19 March 2013
Table 6. Location of Water Quality Criteria Exceedances in the Susitna River
Basin
Bounds of Reach
(Susitna River Miles)
Reach
Number General Description Water Quality Criteria
Exceedance
313 – 184 1
Upper Susitna River,
including headwaters and
tributaries above the
proposed Watana dam site
Aluminum
Iron
184 - 150 2
Middle Susitna River and
tributaries through Devil’s
Canyon and below the
proposed Watana Dam
site
Total Dissolved Gas
Temperature (for Migration)
Aluminum
150 – 99 3
Middle Susitna River and
tributaries from the mouth
of Devil’s Canyon to the
Susitna – Chulitna –
Talkeetna confluence
Temperature (for Migration)
Aluminum
Iron
Total Mercury (Mainstem at Gold
Creek)
99 – 0 4
Lower Susitna River from
Susitna – Chulitna –
Talkeetna confluence to
mouth at Cook Inlet
Temperature (for Spawning,
Talkeetna River)
Dissolved Oxygen
pH
Iron
Mercury
Concentrations of water quality parameters, including metals in sediment immediately below the
proposed Project, are unknown. Metals in these sediments may become mobile once the Project
begins operation. Monitoring information in the immediate vicinity of the reservoir and riverine habitat
will be important for developing two models (reservoir and riverine) which will be coupled for
predicting expected water quality conditions below the proposed dam.
An expanded monitoring network for continuous temperature and water quality data (including
sediment, surface water, potentially pore water) collection is required for this Study for the following
reasons:
• More information is needed to define existing thermal refugia throughout the Susitna drainage.
• Limited information is available on natural, background conditions for water quality.
• It is unknown if seasonal patterns exist for select water quality parameters.
• Additional information is required for calibrating the water quality model to be used in the
water quality modeling study. More recent water quality data will be used for predicting
reservoir conditions and predicting riverine conditions downstream of the proposed dam.
An expanded network of water quality and temperature monitoring sites is proposed from
approximately RM 15.1 to RM 234. Monitoring sites are located at (or nearby) the same sites
characterized during the 1980s studies, as well as additional locations. Monitoring of areas of the
mainstem Susitna River or tributaries with high metals concentrations or temperature measurements
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 20 March 2013
(based on the Data Gap Analysis for Water Quality, URS 2011) will confirm previous observations
and will describe the persistence of any water quality exceedances that might exist.
A.5.3 Project Objective(s)
The collective goal of the water quality studies is to assess the impacts of the proposed Project
operations on water quality in the Susitna River basin with particular reference to state water quality
standards set forth in ADEC regulations Title 18-Health, Safety, and Housing; Chapters: 70-Water
Quality Standards [surface water]; 75-Oil and Other Hazardous Substances Pollution Control
[groundwater], and 80-Drinking Water Standards; of the Alaska Administrative Code (AAC); 18 AAC
70, 18 AAC 75, and 18 AAC 80, respectively (ADEC 2012a; ADEC 2012b; and ADEC 2012c).
Predicting the potential impacts of the dam and its proposed operations on water quality will require
the development of water quality models. The goal of the Water Quality Modeling Study will be to
utilize the extensive information collected from the Baseline Water Quality Study to develop a
model(s) in which to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed Project and operations on various
physical parameters within the Susitna River watershed.
The specific objectives of the Baseline Water Quality Study are to:
• Document historical water quality data and combine with data generated from this study. The
combined data set will be used in the water quality modeling study to predict Project impacts
under various operations.
• Add three years of current stream temperature and meteorological data to the existing data.
Stream temperatures and meteorological data was collected in 2012 (Tetra Tech 2012) and will
continue to be collected in 2013-2014.
• Develop a monitoring program to adequately characterize surface water physical, chemical, and
bacterial conditions in the Susitna River within and downstream of the proposed Project area.
• Measure baseline inorganic metals concentrations in sediment and fish tissue for comparison to
federal and state criteria.
A.6 PROJECT/TASK DESCRIPTION and SCHEDULE
A.6.1 Project Description
Water quality data will be collected from multiple aquatic media including surface water, sediment,
and fish tissue. The fish tissue collection will be conducted as part of Study Plan 7.5/7.6 (Study of Fish
Distribution and Abundance in the Upper Susitna River and the Middle/Lower Susitna River,
respectively). Continuous temperature monitoring will be conducted at 37 sites to inform the
predictive model on how the mainstem river and tributaries will respond to alternative Project
operational scenarios and if changes in water quality conditions could affect aquatic life use and
survival in the Project area. In addition, several other requirements of the 401 Water Quality
Certification Process will be addressed with collection and description of additional water quality data
including the following:
• conducting a water quality baseline assessment;
• description of how existing and designated uses are met;
• use of appropriate field methods and models;
• use of acceptable data quality assurance methods;
• scheduling of technical work to meet deadlines;
• and derivation of load calculations of potential pollutants (pre-Project conditions).
The study area begins at RM 15.1 and extends past the proposed dam site to RM 233.4. The lowermost
boundary of the monitoring is above the area protected for Beluga whale activity. Twelve mainstem
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 21 March 2013
Susitna River monitoring sites are located below the proposed dam site and two mainstem sites above
this location for calibration of the models. Five sloughs will be included in the monitoring and
represent important fish-rearing habitat. Tributaries to the Susitna River will be monitored and include
those contributing large portions of the lower river flow like the: Talkeetna, Chulitna, Deshka, and
Yentna rivers. A partial list of the remaining tributaries that will be included in monitoring and
represents important spawning and rearing habitat for anadromous and resident fisheries include: Gold
Creek, Portage Creek, Tsusena Creek, Watana Creek, and Oshetna River. Water quality (water and
sediment) samples will be collected at 17 of the 38 temperature monitoring sites; 15 below the
proposed dam site and two sites above. Continuous temperature monitoring activities in 2013 and
2014 will follow the 2012 SAP/QAPP for Water Temperature and Monitoring and Meteorological
Station Installation for Use in Water Quality Model Calibration and Development: Susitna River,
South-central Alaska (AEA 2012).
Water quality sampling sites were selected based on the following rationale:
• Adequate representation of locations throughout the Susitna River and tributaries above and
below the proposed dam site;
• Preliminary consultation with AEA and licensing participants including co-location with other
study sites (e.g., in-stream flow, ice processes);
• Access and land ownership issues; and
• Eight of the sites are mainstem monitoring sites that were previously used for Stream Network
Temperature Modeling (SNTEMP) in the 1980s (refer to Table 12). Twenty nine of the
temperature sites are Susitna River mainstem, tributary, or slough locations, most of which
were also monitored in the 1980s by the Alaska Energy Authority.
Water quality data will also be collected at ten Focus Areas along the Susitna River. The Focus Areas
are intended to serve as specific geographic areas of the river that will be the subject of intensive
investigation by multiple resource disciplines including water quality. The proposed Focus Areas were
selected during an interdisciplinary resource meeting that involved a systematic review of aerial
imagery within each of the Geomorphic Reaches (MR1 through MR8) for the entire Middle Segment
of the river. Focus Areas were selected within MR1, MR2, MR5, MR6, MR7, and MR8. Focus Areas
were not selected for MR3 or MR4 due to safety considerations related to Devils Canyon.
A list of water quality parameters and measurements to be collected during this project are summarized
in Table 7. Samples collected within the Focus Areas will be analyzed for a reduced list of parameters
but at a greater frequency (every two weeks for a six week period) than samples collected along the
mainstem network.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 22 March 2013
Table 7. List of Water Quality Parameters to be Measured
Field Measurements Laboratory Measurements
SURFACE WATER
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Hardness
pH Alkalinity
Temperature Nitrate/Nitrite
Specific Conductance Ammonia as N
Turbidity Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Redox Potential Total Phosphorus
Color Ortho-phosphate
Residues Chlorophyll a
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Turbidity
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)
Fecal Coliform
Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylenes
(total aromatic hydrocarbons [TAH])1
Total aqueous hydrocarbons (TAqH, See Table
10)1
Radionuclides (See Table 10)
Aluminum, (Total and Dissolved)
Arsenic, (Total and Dissolved)
Barium, (Total and Dissolved)
Beryllium, (Total and Dissolved)
Cadmium, (Total and Dissolved)
Chromium, (Total and Dissolved)
Cobalt, (Total and Dissolved)
Copper, (Total and Dissolved)
Iron, (Total and Dissolved)
Lead, (Total and Dissolved)
Manganese, (Total and Dissolved)
Magnesium, (Total and Dissolved)
Mercury, (Total and Dissolved)
Methyl-mercury (Dissolved)
Molybdenum, (Total and Dissolved)
Nickel, (Total and Dissolved)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 23 March 2013
Field Measurements Laboratory Measurements
Selenium, (Total and Dissolved)
Table 7. List of Water Quality Parameters to be Measured (continued)
Field Measurements Laboratory Measurements
Thallium, (Total and Dissolved)
Vanadium, (Total and Dissolved)
Zinc, (Total and Dissolved)
SEDIMENT
Aluminum, Total
Arsenic, Total
Cadmium, Total
Copper, Total
Iron, Total
Lead, Total
Mercury, Total
Zinc, Total
TOC
Grain Size
FISH TISSUE
Total Mercury
Methyl-mercury
Arsenic
Cadmium
Selenium
1 Petroleum hydrocarbons will be assessed based on total aromatic hydrocarbons [TAH] and total
aqueous hydrocarbons [TAqH].
A.6.2 Project Implementation Schedule
The Baseline Water Quality Monitoring Study for the Susitna River began October 2012 and will
continue through March 2014. The exact scheduling of the monthly and seasonal sampling will be
coordinated between AEA, URS, and Tt staff. Table 8 gives the projected schedule of activities and
deliverables. Table 9 summarizes sampling frequency and number of samples per site for water
quality monitoring activities for all tasks associated with this QAPP.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 24 March 2013
Table 8. Schedule for the Baseline Water Quality Study Elements and Production
of Associated Deliverables
Monitoring Activity Timeline
Thermal Imaging (one survey) October 2012
MET Station Installation and Data Collection (as part
of the 2012 Water Temperature Monitoring and MET
Station Installation Study)
July 2012
(monitoring activities covered under different QAPP)
QAPP/SAP Preparation and Review January 2013-March 2013
Deployment of Temperature Monitoring Apparatus
(if removed before winter ice-up) June 2013 (retrieve in October 2014)
Water Quality Monitoring (monthly)
June 2013-September 2013
(one sampling event in each of December 2013 and
March 2014)
Focus Area Surface Water Quality Sampling
(every 2 weeks for 6 week period) June-September 2013
Sediment Sampling (one survey) August-September 2013
Fish Tissue Sampling (one survey) August-September 2012/2013
Thermal Imaging (one survey) October 2013
Field Audit < 30 days of project start-up (once per year)
Data Analysis and Management June 2013-November 2013
Data QA Review June 2013-November 2013 (once per month; final
review in November)
QA Review of Initial Study Report December 2013
Initial Study Report December 2013
QA Review of Updated Study Report December 2014
Updated Study Report December 2014
Table 9 includes parameters to be measured for Baseline Monthly WQ samples, Sediment samples,
Focus Area samples, and Fish Tissue samples.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 25 March 2013
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be
Collected for Each Water Quality Monitoring Site.
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
In-Situ Water Quality Parameters
Field
Measurement Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 3 profiles
Sediment1 Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Field
Measurement
pH
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 3 profiles
Sediment1 Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Field
Measurement
Temperature
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 3 profiles
Sediment1 Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Field
Measurement
Specific Conductance
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 3 profiles
Sediment1 Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Field
Measurement Turbidity
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 3 at surface
Sediment1 Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Field
Measurement Redox Potential
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 3 profiles
Sediment1 Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 26 March 2013
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
Field
Measurement Color Baseline WQ
(Visual)
Monthly
June-Sept 3
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be
Collected for Each Water Quality Monitoring Site. (continued)
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
Field
Measurement Residues Baseline WQ
(Visual)
Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
General Water Quality Parameters (grab samples for laboratory analysis)
Laboratory
Analysis Hardness
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Laboratory
Analysis Alkalinity Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Nitrate/Nitrite
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Laboratory
Analysis Ammonia as N Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Laboratory
Analysis Total Phosphorus
Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Laboratory
Analysis Ortho-phosphate Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 27 March 2013
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks for
6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19 (depending
on site)
Laboratory
Analysis Chlorophyll a Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be
Collected for Each Water Quality Monitoring Site. (continued)
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
Laboratory
Analysis Total Dissolved Solids Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Total Suspended Solids Baseline WQ Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Turbidity
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks
for 6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19
(depending on
site)
Laboratory
Analysis TOC Baseline WQ Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
Every 2 weeks
for 6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19
(depending on
site)
Laboratory
Analysis DOC Baseline WQ
Monthly
(June-Sept, Dec
2013 and March
2014)
6*
Laboratory
Analysis Fecal Coliform Baseline WQ Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Laboratory
Analysis
BTEX and PAHs (for Petroleum
Hydrocarbons assessment) Baseline WQ Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Radionuclides Baseline WQ Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Metals – (Water) Dissolved and Total
Laboratory
Analysis Aluminum
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface
Water)
(Total &
Every 2 weeks
for 6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19
(depending on
site)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 28 March 2013
Dissolved)
Laboratory
Analysis Arsenic
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Barium
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 29 March 2013
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be
Collected for Each Water Quality Monitoring Site. (continued)
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
Laboratory
Analysis Beryllium
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Cadmium
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Chromium
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Cobalt
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Copper
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Iron
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface Water)
(Total &
Dissolved)
Every 2 weeks
for 6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19
(depending on
site)
Laboratory
Analysis Lead
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Manganese
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Magnesium
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Mercury
Baseline WQ
(Total &
Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Focus Areas
(Surface Water)
(Total &
Dissolved)
Every 2 weeks
for 6 weeks
(June-Sept)
6 to 19
(depending on
site)
Laboratory
Analysis
Methyl-mercury
(Dissolved) Focus Areas Every 2 weeks
for 6 weeks
6 to 19
(depending on
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 30 March 2013
(Surface Water) (June-Sept) site)
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be
Collected for Each Water Quality Monitoring Site. (continued)
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
Laboratory
Analysis Molybdenum Baseline WQ (Total
& Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Nickel Baseline WQ (Total
& Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Selenium Baseline WQ (Total
& Dissolved)
Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Thallium Baseline WQ (Total
& Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Vanadium Baseline WQ (Total
& Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Laboratory
Analysis Zinc Baseline WQ (Total
& Dissolved)
Monthly
June-Sept 6*
Metals –Sediment (Total)
Laboratory
Analysis Aluminum Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Arsenic Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Cadmium Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Copper Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Iron Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Lead Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Mercury Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Zinc Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis TOC Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Laboratory
Analysis Grain Size Sediment Samples Single Event
(Aug or Sept) 3
Metals – Fish Tissue (Use EPA Sampling Method 1669)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 31 March 2013
Laboratory
Analysis Total Mercury Fish Tissue
Screening
Single Event
(September) 3-6 fish
Table 9. Sample Collection Frequency per Analyte and No. of Samples to be
Collected for Each Water Quality Monitoring Site. (continued)
Product Measurement/Parameter(s) Task Sampling
Frequency
No. of
Samples/Site
Laboratory
Analysis Methyl-mercury Fish Tissue
Screening
Single Event
(September)
3-6 fish
Laboratory
Analysis Arsenic Fish Tissue
Screening
Single Event
(September)
3-6 fish
Laboratory
Analysis Cadmium Fish Tissue
Screening
Single Event
(September)
3-6 fish
Laboratory
Analysis Selenium Fish Tissue
Screening
Single Event
(September)
3-6 fish
*Baseline monthly WQ samples will be collected along a transect at each sample location. Samples will be collected at 3
equidistant locations along each transect and at two depths (top and bottom) if water depth is greater than 5ft (1.5 m). If
water depth at each sampling point along the transect is less than 4ft (1.5m) then only a top sample will be collected. Top
(or surface) samples will be collected at 0.5 m below water surface and bottom samples will be collected 0.5 m above the
bottom.
1 Field measurements to be collected from surface water directly above sediment sampling location.
A.7 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIES AND CRITERIA FOR MEASUREMENT
DATA
A.7.1 Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)
Data Quality Objectives (DQOs, EPAQA/G4). DQOs are qualitative and quantitative statements
derived from the DQO Process that:
• Clarify the monitoring objectives (i.e., determine water/wastewater pollutant concentrations of
interest and how these values compare to water quality standards regulatory limits).
• Define the appropriate type of data needed. In order to accomplish the monitoring objectives,
the appropriate type of data needed is defined by the respective AWQS. For pollutants,
compliance with the AWQS is determined by specific measurement requirements. The
measurement system is designed to produce water pollutant concentration data that are of the
appropriate quantity and quality to assess compliance.
For this Tier 2 QAPP, the DQOs require maintenance of sufficient data quality to demonstrate
compliance with Alaska’s Water Quality Standards. Data will meet all MQOs in order to ensure
consistent quality for use in calibrating and running the water quality model for predicting outcomes of
water quality scenarios under different Project operation scenarios.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 32 March 2013
A.7.2 Measurement Quality Objectives (MQOs)
Measurement Quality Objectives (MQOs) are designed to evaluate and control various phases
(sampling, preparation, and analysis) of the measurement process to ensure that total measurement
uncertainty is within the range prescribed by the project’s DQOs. MQOs define the acceptable quality
(data validity) of field and laboratory data for the project. MQOs are defined in terms of the following
data quality indicators:
• Detectability
• Precision
• Bias/Accuracy
• Completeness
• Representativeness
• Comparability
The MQOs for this project are presented in Table 10. Industry standard field methods will be used
throughout this project to minimize measurement bias (systematic error) and to improve precision (to
reduce random error).
Detectability is the ability of the method to reliably measure a pollutant concentration above
background. DEC DOW uses two components to define detectability: method detection limit (MDL)
and practical quantification limit (PQL) or reporting limit (RL).
• The MDL is the minimum value which the instrument can discern above background but with
no certainty to the accuracy of the measured value. For field measurements, the manufacturer’s
listed instrument detection limit (IDL) can be used.
• The PQL or RL is the minimum value that can be reported with confidence (usually some
multiple of the MDL).
Note: The measurement method of choice should at a minimum have a practical quantification
limit or reporting limit 3 times more sensitive than the respective DEC WQS and/or permitted
pollutant level (for permitted facilities).
Sample data measured below the MDL is reported as ND or non-detect. Sample data measured ≥
MDL but ≤ PQL or RL is reported as estimated data. Sample data measured above the PQL or RL is
reported as reliable data unless otherwise qualified per the specific sample analysis.
Precision is the degree of agreement among repeated measurements of the same parameter and
provides information about the consistency of methods. Precision is expressed in terms of the relative
percent difference (RPD) between two measurements (A and B).
For field measurements, precision is assessed by measuring replicate (paired) samples at the same
locations and as soon as possible to limit temporal variance in sample results. Overall project
precision is measured by collecting blind (to the laboratory) field replicate samples. Laboratory
precision is determined similarly via analysis of laboratory duplicate samples. For paired and small
data sets, project precision is calculated using the following formula:
= 100 ∗−
+ 2
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 33 March 2013
Where: RPD = relative percent difference
A = primary sample
B = replicate field sample or laboratory duplicate sample
For larger paired precision data sets (e.g. overall project precision) or multiple replicate precision data,
use the following formula:
RSD = 100*σ/mean
=
Where: RSD = relative standard deviation
σ = standard deviation
k = number of paired replicate samples (A and B)
d = A - B
A = primary sample
B = replicate field sample or laboratory duplicate sample
Field sample replicates for assessment of precision will be analyzed at no less than at 10 percent
frequency of the total number of samples. Laboratory replicates for assessment of precision will be
analyzed at no less than at 5 percent frequency of the total number of samples submitted to the
laboratory.
For sample results that exceed the reporting limit (RL), the relative percent difference (RPD) will be
less than or equal to 20 percent. No criteria are presented for duplicates that are below the RL, as these
data are provided for informational purposes only. When one or more of the results is below the RL,
professional judgment will be used in determining the compliance of the data to project requirements.
Bias (Accuracy) is a measure of confidence that describes how close a measurement is to its “true”
value. Methods to determine and assess accuracy of field and laboratory measurements include,
instrument calibrations, various types of QC checks (e.g., sample split measurements, sample spike
recoveries, matrix spike duplicates, continuing calibration verification checks, internal standards,
sample blank measurements (field and lab blanks), external standards), performance audit samples
(DMRQA, blind Water Supply or Water Pollution PE samples from American Association for
Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) certified, etc. Bias/Accuracy is usually assessed using the following
formula:
100×=TrueValue
lueMeasuredVaAccuracy
Completeness is a measure of the percentage of valid samples collected and analyzed to yield
sufficient information to make informed decisions with statistical confidence. Completeness will be
judged by the amount of valid data compared to the data expected. Valid data are those data in
compliance with the data quality criteria as presented in this section, and in compliance within
expected range of conditions and daily fluctuation patterns. While the goal for the criteria described
above is 100 percent completeness, a level of 95 percent completeness will be considered acceptable.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 34 March 2013
However, any time data are incomplete, decisions regarding re-sampling and/or re-analysis will be
made. These decisions will take into account the project data quality objectives as presented above..
Project completeness is determined for each pollutant parameter using the following formula:
T – (I+NC) x (100%) = Completeness
T
Where T = Total number of expected sample measurements.
I = Number of invalid sample measured results.
NC = Number of sample measurements not completed (e.g. spilled sample, etc).
Project % Data Completeness Goal = 95% /analyte for all project analytes
Representativeness assigns what parameters to sample for, where to sample, type of sample (grab,
continuous, composite, etc.) and frequency of sample collection. Sample representativeness is the
degree to which data accurately and precisely represent a characteristic of a population.
Representativeness will be addressed at two distinct points in the data collection process. During
sample collection, the use of generally accepted sampling procedures applied in a consistent manner
throughout the project will help ensure that samples are representative of conditions at the point where
the sample was taken. During subsampling (sample aliquot removal) in the laboratory, samples will be
inverted several times to ensure that the analytical subsample is well mixed and therefore
representative of the sample container’s contents.
Comparability is a measure of the confidence with which one dataset can be compared to another. This
is a qualitative assessment and is addressed primarily by sampling design through use of comparable
sampling procedures or, for monitoring programs, through consistent sampling of stations over time. In
the laboratory, comparability is assured through the use of comparable analytical procedures and
ensuring that project staff are trained in the proper application of the procedures. Within-study
comparability will be assessed through analytical performance (quality control samples).
Table 10: Project Measurement Quality Objectives (MQOs)
Group Analyte Method MDL
(µg/L)
PQL
(µg/L)
Alaska WQS
Precision
(RPD)
Accuracy
(%
Recovered) Aquatic Life Recreation/Drinking
Water
Water Quality
Dissolved Oxygen
(DO, Field
Measurement)
Portable
Multi-
Parameter
Field Meter
(YSI or
equivalent)
NA ±0.01
mg/L
>4.0 mg/L >7 mg/l for anadromous
fish; >5 mg/l for non-
anadromous fish; < 17
mg/L
±20% NA
Redox Potential (Field
Measurement)
Portable Multi-
Parameter Field
Meter (YSI or
equivalent)
NA
NA
NA ±10% NA
pH (Field
Measurement)
Portable
Multi-
Parameter
Field Meter
(YSI or
equivalent)
NA ±0.01 pH
units
6.5 - 8.5; not
vary by 0.5
from natural
condition
6.5 - 8.5 ±0.1 pH
units NA
Temperature (Field
Measurement)
Portable
Multi-
Parameter
Field Meter
(YSI or
equivalent)
NA 0.1°C
<20°C Migration
routes < 15°C
Spawning areas <
13°C Rearing areas
< 15°C Egg /fry
<30°C ±0.2°C ±0.2°C
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 35 March 2013
incubation < 13°C
Color (Field
Observation) Field Kit NA NA
Color or apparent
color may not
reduce the depth of
the compensation
point for
photosynthetic
activity by more
than 10% from the
normal.
May not exceed 15
color units over the
natural condition
NA NA
Turbidity (Laboratory) SM21 2130B 0.05
NTU NA
May not have more
than a 10%
increase from the
normal.
May not exceed 5
NTU above natural
conditions when
natural turbidity is 50
or less. If above 50
may not have more
than a 10% increase.
± 10% ±5 NTU
Turbidity (Field
Measurement)
Portable Hach
Meter or
equivalent NA 0.01
NTU
May not have more
than a 10%
increase from the
normal.
May not exceed 5
NTU above natural
conditions when
natural turbidity is 50
or less. If above 50
may not have more
than a 10% increase.
Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 3100
May not exceed
1,000 mg/L or have
adverse effect to
aquatic life
May not exceed 500
mg/L 5 75-125
Total Suspended Solids 2540D 150 5 75-125
Residues
Not allowed to
impair designated
uses, cause
nuisances or result
is nuisance species
Not allowed to impair
designated uses, cause
nuisances, or result in
nuisance species, or
produce objectionable
odor or taste.
NA NA
Specific Conductance
Portable
Multi-
Parameter
Field Meter
(YSI or
equivalent)
NA
0-1: 0.001
1-10: 0.01
10-100:
0.1
(mS/cm)
NA NA ± 10% ± 10%
Hardness SM21
2340B 2,000 2,000 NA NA NA NA
Alkalinity SM21
2320B 310 1,000
20,000 min as
CaCO3 except
where natural
alkalinity is
lower
20,000 min as CaCO3
except where natural
alkalinity is lower
NA 85-115
Chlorophyll a 10300 20
Fecal
Coliforms Fecal Coliforms SM21
9222D 1cfu/100mL 1cfu/100mL NA 100 FC/100 mL NA NA
Nutrients
Nitrogen, Total
Kjeldahl (TKN) SM21
4500N D 310 1.000 NA NA 30 80 - 120
Ammonia-N SM21
4500NH3-F 3,100 10,000 pH dependent pH dependent 75 75-125
Nitrate/ Nitrite SM21
4500NO3-F 6.2 20 NA 10,000 µg/L 20 90-110
Total Organic Carbon
(TOC) SM21 5310B 150 500 NA NA 20 80-120
Dissolved Organic
Carbon (DOC) SM21 5310B 150 500 NA NA 20 80-120
Ortho-Phosphate SM21
4500P-E 31 100 NA NA 25 75-125
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 36 March 2013
Total Phosphorus SM21 4500
PE/4500-PB 3.1 10 NA NA 25 75 - 125
Total
Recoverable
Metals
Aluminum EPA200.8 0.62 2.0
750 µg/L
Acute; 87 µg/L
chronic
NA 20 85-115
Arsenic EPA200.8 1.5 0.5
340 µg/L
acute; 150
µg/L chronic
0.018 µg/L 20 85-115
Barium EPA200.8 0.025 0.25 NA 2,000 µg/L 20 85-115
Beryllium EPA200.8 0.025 0.05 NA 4 µg/L 20 85-115
Cadmium EPA200.8 0.015 0.05 Hardness
dependent 5 µg/L 20 85-115
Calcium EPA200.8 NA NA
Chromium EPA200.8 Hardness
dependent
Cobalt EPA200.8 0.01 0.02 NA 20 85-115
Copper EPA200.8 0.05 0.5 Hardness
dependent 1,300 µg/L 20 85-115
Iron EPA200.8 6.2 20
NA Acute;
1000 µg/L
chronic
NA 20 85-115
Lead EPA200.8 0.031 0.1 Hardness
Dependent NA 20 85-115
Magnesium EPA200.8 6.2 20 NA NA 20 85-115
Manganese EPA200.8 0.015 0.05 NA NA 20 85-115
Mercury EPA
1631E 0.0005 0.001
1.4 µg/L acute;
.77 µg/L
chronic
2 µg/L 20 85-115
Molybdenum EPA200.8 0.015 0.05 NA NA 20 85-115
Nickel EPA200.8 0.062 0.62 Hardness
Dependent NA 20 85-115
Selenium EPA200.8 0.31 1.0 NA 50 µg/L 20 85-115
Thallium EPA200.8 0.006 0.02 NA 2 µg/L 20 85-115
Vanadium EPA200.8 0.31 1.0 NA NA 20 85-115
Zinc EPA200.8 0.4 3.1 Hardness
Dependenta 7,400 µg/L 20 85-115
Dissolved
Metals
Aluminum EPA200.8 0.62 2.0
750 µg/L
Acute; 87 µg/L
chronic
NA 20 85-115
Arsenic EPA200.8 1.5 0.5
340 µg/L
Acute; 150
µg/L chronic
0.018 µg/L 20 85-115
Barium EPA200.8 0.025 0.25 NA NA 20 85-115
Beryllium EPA200.8 0.025 0.05 NA NA 20 85-115
Cadmium EPA200.8 0.015 0.05 Hardness
Dependenta NA 20 85-115
Calcium EPA
200.8 NA NA 20 85-115
Chromium EPA200.8 20 85-115
Cobalt EPA200.8 0.01 0.02 NA NA 20 85-115
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 37 March 2013
Copper EPA200.8 0.05 0.5 Hardness
Dependenta 1300 µg/L 20 85-115
Iron EPA200.8 6.2 20
NA Acute;
1000 µg/L
chronic
NA 20 85-115
Lead EPA200.8 0.031 0.1 Hardness
Dependenta NA 20 85-115
Magnesium EPA200.8 6.2 20 NA NA 20 85-115
Manganese EPA200.8 0.015 0.05 NA NA 20 85-115
Mercury EPA
1631E 0.0005 0.001
1.4 µg/L
Acute; 0.77
µg/L Chronic
NA 20 85-115
Methyl-mercury
Molybdenum EPA200.8 0.015 0.05 NA NA 20 85-115
Nickel EPA200.8 0.062 0.62 Hardness
dependent NA 20 85-115
Selenium EPA200.8 0.31 1.0 NA 50 µg/L 20 85-115
Thallium EPA200.8 0.006 0.02 NA 2 µg/L 20 85-115
Vanadium EPA200.8 0.31 1.0 NA NA 20 85-115
Zinc EPA200.8 0.4 3.1 Hardness
Dependenta 7400 µg/L 20 85-115
Sediment
Total
Recoverable
Inorganics
Aluminum SW6020 0.62
mg/kg
2.0
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Arsenic SW6020 0.31
mg/kg
1.0
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Cadmium SW6020 0.062
mg/kg
0.2
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Copper SW6020 0.18
mg/kg
0.6
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Iron SW6020 3.1
mg/kg 10 mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Lead SW6020 0.062
mg/kg
0.2
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Mercury SW6020 0.012
mg/kg
0.04
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Zinc SW6020 0.31
mg/kg
1.0
mg/kg NA NA 20 80-120
Fish Tissue
Inorganics
Total Mercury EPA 1631 0.012
ng/g 0.40 ng/g NA NA 30 70 - 130
Methyl-mercury EPA 1630 1.0 ng/g 3.0 ng/g NA NA 35 65-135
Arsenic EPA 1638 0.014
mg/kg
0.040
mg/kg NA NA 30 70 - 130
Cadmium EPA 1638 0.003
mg/kg
0.010
mg/kg NA NA 30 70 - 130
Selenium EPA 1638 0.06
mg/kg
0.15
mg/kg NA NA 30 70 - 130
Benzene EPA 624 0.12 0.4 20 80-120
Ethylbenzene EPA 624 0.31 1.0 20 75-125
Toluene EPA 624 0.31 1.0 20 75-120
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 38 March 2013
Xylenes, total EPA 624 0.62 2.0 20 75-130
Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Acenaphthylene 625M
SIMS .015 0.05
TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 50-105
Acenaphthene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 45-110
Fluorene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 50-110
Phenanthrene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 50-115
Anthracene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 55-110
Fluoranthene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 55-115
Pyrene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 50-130
Benzo(a)Anthracene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 55-110
Chrysene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 55-110
Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 45-120
Benzo[k]Fluoranthene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 45-125
Benzo[a]pyrene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 55-110
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]
pyrene
625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 45-125
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 625M
SIMS .015 0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or 30 40-125
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 39 March 2013
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L. impart odor or taste.
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 625M
SIMS .015
0.05 TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 40-125
Naphthalene 625M
SIMS .0.031 0.1
TAqH in water
column may not
exceed 15 µg/L.
TAH may not
exceed 10 µg/L.
May not cause
visible sheen or
impart odor or taste.
30 40-100
Radionuclides
Gross Alpha/ Beta EPA
900.1 NA NA 20
Gamma Photon
Emitters
EPA
901.1 NA NA
Radium 226 EPA
903.1 NA NA
Radium 228 EPA 904 NA NA
Strontium 89/90 EPA 905 NA NA
NA = None available.
a Metal standards for the protection of aquatic life are hardness dependent, the formulas for calculating the appropriate standard are:
Acute Chronic Total to Dissolved conversion Factor
Cadmium 1.0166(ln hardness) -3.924 e 0.7409(ln hardness) -4.179 1.136672-[(lnhardness)(0.041838) for acute
1.101672-[(lnhardness)(0.041838) for chronic
Copper e0.9422(ln hardness) - 1.700 e 0.8545(ln hardness) - 1.702 0.960 acute and chronic
Lead e1.273(ln hardness) - 1.460 e1.273(ln hardness) -4.705 1.46203 -[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] for acute
1.46203 -[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] for chronic
A.8 SPECIAL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS/CERTIFICATION
This QAPP and supporting materials will be distributed to all participants. The local Field Operations
Project Manager, Mark Vania, will conduct a procedural review before the field team is mobilized for
sampling. The procedural review will include the requirements of the QAPP and referenced SOPs, as
well as instrument manufacturers’ operation and maintenance instructions. It will be performed
concurrently with a check that all equipment and sampling gear are fully functional and ready for
deployment. In addition, there will be discussions and demonstrations of sampling method(s) to be
used and discussions regarding specific health and safety concerns. Each sampling team will consist of,
at a minimum, one sample collector and a scientist familiar with QC requirements, which will ensure
strict adherence to the project protocols, check all documentation for completeness and correctness,
and verify that no transcription errors or omissions have been made in preparing sample custody
records and other project documentation.
All field team personnel must have completed first aid/CPR training as well as Swift Water Rescue
prior to conducting any monitoring activities on the Susitna River. The Field Operations Project
Manager will ensure that all field personnel meet these requirements.
Project training required for this study is summarized in Table 11.
Table 11: Project Training/Certification
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 40 March 2013
Specialized Training/Certification Field
Staff
Lab
Staff
Monitoring
Supervisor
Lab
Supervisor
Project
QA
Officer
Safety training – Swift Water Rescue Training X X X
Safety training – Laboratory Procedures X X X
Safety training – First Aid/CPR X X X
Water sampling techniques X X X
Instrument calibration and QC activities for
field measurements X X X
Instrument calibration and QC activities for
laboratory measurements X X X
QA principles X X X
QA for water monitoring systems X X
Chain of Custody procedures for samples and
data X X X X X
Handling and Shipping of Hazardous Goods X X X X X
Specific Field Measurement Methods Training X X X
Lab Analytical Methods Training X X X
A.9 DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS
Thorough documentation of all field sample collection is necessary for proper processing of data and,
ultimately, for interpreting study results. Field sample collection will be documented in writing, on
forms as well as on the following forms and labels:
• A field log notebook for general observations and notes
• A Field Data Record Form that contains information about observations and measurements
made and samples collected at the site
• Checklists for each sampling event, sampling point, and sampling time.
Copies of the Field Forms and Checklists are provided in Appendix B.
All lab reports will be sent to the Field Operations PM in both electronic and hard copy. Each lab
report will contain at a minimum, a summary QA data page, all lab results, data validation flags and
explanation, all QC sample results with each sample analysis batch and the lab’s analyte specific QC
acceptance criteria limits. Comments about condition of samples when receive by the lab, exceedances
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 41 March 2013
of any holding times, and any other issues encountered why performing the analysis will also be
recorded and provided within the lab reports.
The Technical Leads, and the appropriate PMs within subcontractor organizations will maintain files,
as appropriate, as repositories for information and data used in preparing any reports and documents
during the project and will supervise the use of materials in the project files. The following information
will be included:
• Any reports and documents prepared
• Contract and Task Order information
• Project QAPP
• Results of technical reviews, data quality assessments, and audits
• Communications (memoranda; internal notes; telephone conversation records; letters; meeting
minutes; and all written correspondence among the project team personnel, subcontractors,
suppliers, or others)
• Maps, photographs, and drawings
• Studies, reports, documents, and newspaper articles pertaining to the project
• Special data compilations
• Spreadsheet data files: physical measurements, analytical chemistry data (hard copy and disk)
Copies of the field log books and physical characterization/water quality data sheets and sampling
checklists will be supplied to the Field PM at the close of each sampling event. These data will be used
in conjunction with inspection checklists to compile the sampling event reports. Formal reports that are
generated from the data will be subject to technical and editorial review before submission to AEA and
will be maintained at URS’s Anchorage, Alaska and Tt’s Seattle, Washington offices in their central
file (disk and hard copy). The data reports will include a summary of the types of data collected,
sampling dates, and any problems or anomalies observed during sample collection.
If any change(s) in this QAPP are required during the study, a memo will be sent to each person on the
distribution list describing the change(s), following approval by the appropriate persons and ADEC.
The memos will be attached to the QAPP.
All written records, data, QAPP documents, project reports, and any other document relevant to the
sampling and processing of samples will be maintained at URS’s Anchorage, Alaska and Tt’s Seattle,
Washington offices in the central file. Records of all project documents will also be maintained at
AEA Anchorage, Alaska office. All project records will be maintained at URS and Tt for 10 years
following expiration of the contract. All project records will be maintained at AEA for the life of the
project.
In addition to any written report, data collected for this study will be submitted electronically to ADEC
via a CD ROM, ZIP Disk or email ZIP file. All dates will be formatted as “MM-DD-YYYY”.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 42 March 2013
B. DATA GENERATION AND ACQUISITION
B.1 SAMPLING PROCESS DESIGN (Experimental Design)
This SAP and QAPP is prepared as part of the implementation of the 2013-2014 Baseline Water
Quality Study Plan. The SAP and QAPP is standard documentation prepared before any water model
development begins. These documents follow guidelines for the State of Alaska and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Credible Data Policy (ADEC 2005). The following
sections document how water quality data will be collected such that existing and post-Project water
quality conditions within the Susitna River basin can be characterized. Data collected as part of this
study will be used in the Water Quality Model to predict how operational scenarios will impact water
quality conditions in both the reservoir and riverine portions of the basin.
Water quality data will be collected from multiple aquatic media including surface water, sediment,
and fish tissue. As stated earlier in the document, the fish tissue collection will be conducted as part of
Study Plan 7.5/7.6 (Study of Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Upper Susitna River and the
Middle/Lower Susitna River, respectively). Tissue or whole fish samples will be collected in the
mainstem Susitna River under Study Plan 7.5 and Study Plan 7.6 for use in analysis of potential for
bioaccumulation. Continuous temperature monitoring will inform the predictive model on how the
mainstem river and tributaries will respond to alternative Project operational scenarios and if changes
in water quality conditions could affect aquatic life use and survival in the Project area. The
continuous temperature monitoring to be completed in 2013 and 2014 will follow the approved 2012
SAP/QAPP for Water Temperature and Monitoring and Meteorological Station Installation for Use in
Water Quality Model Calibration and Development: Susitna River, South-central Alaska (AEA 2012).
In addition, several other requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification Process will be
addressed with collection and description of additional data including the following:
• conducting a water quality baseline assessment;
• description of how existing and designated uses are met;
• use of appropriate field methods and models;
• use of acceptable data quality assurance methods;
• scheduling of technical work to meet deadlines; and
• derivation of load calculations of potential pollutants (pre-Project conditions).
Three types of water quality monitoring activities will be implemented under this QAPP: 1) routine
monitoring for characterizing water quality baseline conditions, 2) a single, comprehensive survey for
a larger array of parameters, and 3) detailed monitoring and intensive investigation of current
conditions at Focus Area site locations. Frequency of sampling water quality parameters varies by
category and potential for mobilization and bioavailability. Most of the general water quality
parameters and select metals will be sampled on a monthly basis since each parameter has been
demonstrated to be present in one or both of surface water and sediment (URS 2011). An initial
screening survey has been proposed for several other toxics that might be detected in sediment and
tissue samples (Table 9). The single event surveys for toxics in sediment, tissue, or water will trigger
additional study for extent of contamination and potential timing of exposure if results exceed criteria
or thresholds (e.g., LAETs, LC50s, etc.). The general list of water quality parameters and metals will
be used in calibrating the water quality model in both a riverine and reservoir environment.
The operation of temperature monitoring sites (Tetra Tech 2012) will continue as part of water quality
monitoring activities in 2013/2014. Continuous temperature monitoring activities in 2013/2014 will
follow the approved 2012 SAP/QAPP for Water Temperature and Monitoring and Meteorological
Station Installation for Use in Water Quality Model Calibration and Development: Susitna River,
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 43 March 2013
South-central Alaska (AEA 2012). Table 12 lists the temperature monitoring sites. These sites were
selected based on the following rationale:
• Adequate representation of locations throughout the Susitna River and tributaries above and
below the proposed dam site for the purpose of a baseline water quality characterization;
• Location on tributaries where proposed access road-crossing impacts might occur during and
after construction (upstream/downstream sampling points on each crossing);
• Preliminary consultation with AEA and licensing participants including co-location with other
study sites (e.g., instream flow, ice processes);
• Access and land ownership issues; and
• Eight of the sites are mainstem monitoring sites that were previously used for SNTEMP
modeling in the 1980s. Thirty-one of the sites are Susitna River mainstem, tributary, or slough
locations, most of which were monitored in the 1980s.
B.1.1 Define Monitoring Objectives(s) and Appropriate Data Quality Objectives
The collective goal of the water quality studies is to assess the effects of the proposed Project and its
operations on water quality in the Susitna River basin, which will inform development of any
appropriate conditions for inclusion in the Project license. The Project is expected to change some of
the water quality characteristics of the resulting riverine portion of the drainage once the dam is in
place as well as the inundated area that will become the reservoir.
The objectives of the Baseline Water Quality Study are as follows:
• Document historical water quality data and evaluate for use with data generated from this
study. The combined data set will be used in the water quality modeling study to predict
Project impacts under various operations.
• Generate additional years of stream temperature and meteorological data to the existing data.
An effort will be made to collect continuous water temperature data year-round, with the
understanding that records may be interrupted by equipment damage during river floods, ice
formation around the monitoring devices, ice break-up and physical damage to the anchoring
devices, or removal by unauthorized visitors to a site.
• Develop a monitoring program to adequately characterize surface water physical, chemical, and
bacterial conditions in the Susitna River within and downstream of the proposed Project area.
• Measure baseline metals concentrations in sediment and fish tissue for comparison to state
criteria.
The DQOs described in Section A.7.1 prescribed generation of High Quality End-Use Tier 2
Monitoring Data used to compare against ADEC water quality standards. Data generated from field
collection and from modeling results will be compared against ADEC water quality standards.
B.1.2 Characterize the General Monitoring Location/s
Baseline Water Quality Data Collection: Longitudinal Profile of the Susitna River
Twelve mainstem Susitna River monitoring sites are located below the proposed dam site and two
mainstem sites above this location. Five sloughs will be monitored that represent a combination of
physical settings in the drainage and that are known to support important fish-rearing habitat.
Tributaries to the Susitna River will be monitored and include those contributing large portions of the
lower river flow like the Talkeetna, Chulitna, Deshka, and Yentna rivers. A partial list of the remaining
tributaries that will be monitored represent important spawning and rearing habitat for anadromous and
resident fisheries and include: Gold Creek, Portage Creek, Tsusena Creek, Watana Creek, and Oshetna
River.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 44 March 2013
Monitoring sites are spaced at approximately 5 mile intervals so that the various factors that influence
water quality conditions are captured and support the development (and calibration) of the water
quality model. Frequency of sites along the length of the river is important for capturing localized
effects from tributaries and from past and current human activity.
These sites were selected based on the following rationale:
• Adequate representation of locations throughout the Susitna River and tributaries above and
below the proposed dam site for the purpose of a baseline water quality characterization.
• Location on tributaries where proposed access road-crossing impacts might occur during and
after construction (upstream/downstream sampling points on each crossing).
• Preliminary consultation with licensing participants including co-location with other study sites
(e.g., instream flow, ice processes).
• Access and land ownership issues.
• Eight of the sites are mainstem monitoring sites that were previously used for SNTEMP
modeling (see Section 5.6) in the 1980s. Thirty-one of the sites are Susitna River mainstem,
tributary, or slough locations, most of which were monitored in the 1980s.
Table 12 lists the monitoring locations for continuous temperature monitoring and baseline water
quality data collection in the mainstem Susitna River, tributaries, and sloughs. Baseline water quality
data collection with occur at the 17 sites bolded in Table 12. Monitoring locations are also shown in
Figure 2 and in more detail in figures in Appendix A.
Table 12: Site Location and Rationale
Susitna
River
Mile
Description Susitna
River
Slough ID
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Location
Rationale
15.1 Susitna above
Alexander Creek
NA 61.4391 -150.4851 Outer Project
area site (above
the “Beluga
Line”
25.83 Susitna Station NA 61.5454 -150.516 Influence of
upstream
tributary
28.0 Yentna River NA 61.5876 -150.4831 Major tributary
29.5 Susitna above
Yentna
NA 61.5759 -150.4270 Above major
tribuatry
40.63 Deshka River NA 61.7095 -150.3248 Major tributary
55.01 Susitna NA 61.8622 -150.1844 Above major
tributary
83.83 Susitna at Parks
Highway East
NA 62.1748 -150.1732 Mainstem river
site
83.93 Susitna at Parks
Highway West
NA 62.1811 -150.1679 Side channel
habitat
connected with
the mainstem
95.8 LRX 1 NA 62.3063 -150.1087 Below
confluence of
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 45 March 2013
Susitna
River
Mile
Description Susitna
River
Slough ID
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Location
Rationale
major tributary
97.2 Talkeetna River NA 62.3424 -150.1122 Major tributary
98.1 Chulitna River NA 62.5676 -150.2379 Major tributary
103.02,3 Talkeetna NA 62.3943 -150.134 Downstream of
existing
townsite;
Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
103.3 Talkeetna NA 62.3972 -150.1373 Upstream of
existing townsite
113.02 LRX 18 NA 62.5252 -150.1144 Important side
channel habitat
120.72,3 Curry Fishwheel
Camp
NA 62.6178 -150.0136 Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
126.0 -- 8A 62.6704 -149.9029 Important side
channel habitat
126.12 LRX 29 NA 62.6739 -149.8991 Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
129.23 -- 9 62.7025 -149.8412 Important side
channel habitat
130.82 LRX 35 NA 62.7136 -149.8089 Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
136.5 Susitna near Gold
Creek
NA 62.7673 -149.6935 Below
confluence of
major tributary
136.83 Gold Creek NA 62.7675 -149.6919 Major tributary
138.01 -- 16B 62.7802 -149.6853 Important side
channel habitat
138.63 Indian River NA 62.8009 -149.664 Major tributary
138.72 Susitna above
Indian River
NA 62.7854 -149.6484 Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
140.0 -- 19 62.7939 -149.6143 Important side
channel habitat
140.12 LRX 53 NA 62.7945 -149.6129 Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
142.0 -- 21 62.8163 -149.576 Important side
channel habitat
148.0 Susitna below
Portage Creek
NA 62.8303 -149.3827 Downstream of
major tributary
148.82 Susitna above
Portage Creek
NA 62.8304 -149.3803 Historic (1980s)
monitoring site
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 46 March 2013
Susitna
River
Mile
Description Susitna
River
Slough ID
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Location
Rationale
148.8 Portage Creek NA 62.8267 -149.3693 Major tributary
165.01 Susitna NA 62.7916 -148.997 Mid-point
between
neighboring sites
180.31 Susitna below
Tsusena Creek
NA 62.8134 -148.6568 Downstream of
major tributary
181.33 Tsusena Creek NA 62.8217 -148.6068 Major tributary
184.51 Susitna at Watana
Dam site
NA 62.8226 -148.533 Boundary
condition
between the
reservoir and
riverine models
194.1 Watana Creek NA 62.8296 -148.259 Major tributary
stream to the
proposed
reservoir
206.8 Kosina Creek NA 62.7822 -147.94 Major tributary
stream to the
proposed
reservoir
223.73 Susitna near
Cantwell
NA 62.7052 147.538 Uppermost
mainstem site in
the proposed
reservoir
233.4 Oshetna River NA 62.6402 -147.383 Uppermost
tributary in the
Project area
1 Site not sampled for water quality or temperature in the 1980s or location moved slightly from original location.
2 Proposed mainstem Susitna River temperature monitoring sites for purposes of 1980s SNTEMP model evaluation.
3 Locations with overlap of water quality temperature monitoring sites with other studies.
Locations in bold font represent both temperature and water quality samples are collected from a site. Locations in italics
represent sites which were not installed during the 2012 sampling year.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 47 March 2013
Figure 2. 2012/2013 Stream Water Quality and Temperature Data Collection Sites
for the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project
Water Quality Data Collection: Focus Areas on the Susitna River
A total of ten Focus Areas are proposed for detailed study within the Middle Segment of the river. The
Focus Areas are intended to serve as specific geographic areas of the river that will be the subject of
intensive investigation by multiple resource disciplines including water quality. The proposed Focus
Areas were selected during an interdisciplinary resource meeting that involved a systematic review of
aerial imagery within each of the Geomorphic Reaches (MR1 through MR8) for the entire Middle
Segment of the river. Focus Areas were selected within MR1, MR2, MR5, MR6, MR7, and MR8.
Focus Areas were not selected for MR3 or MR4 due to safety considerations related to Devils Canyon.
The Focus Areas selected were those deemed representative of the major features in the Geomorphic
Reach and included mainstem habitat types of known biological significance (i.e., where fish have
been observed based on previous and/or contemporary studies), as well as some locations (e.g, Slough
17) where previous sampling revealed few/ no fish. The areas included representative side channels,
side sloughs, upland sloughs, and tributary mouths.
The Focus Area selections considered:
• All major habitat types (main channel, side channel, side slough, upland slough, tributary
delta).
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 48 March 2013
• At least one Focus Area per geomorphic reach (excepting reaches associated with Devils
Canyon) will be included that are representative of other areas.
• A replicate sampling strategy will be used for measure habitat types within each Focus Area
which many include random selection process.
• Areas that are known (based on existing and contemporary data) to be biologically important
for salmon spawning/ rearing in mainstem and lateral habitats will be sampled (i.e., critical
habitats) and
• Areas for which little or no fish use has been documented or for which information on fish use
is lacking, will also be sampled.
•
Maps of each Focus Area with River Mile numbers included are shown below in Figures 3 through 12.
Figure 3. Map of Focus Area 1— Below Dam
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 49 March 2013
Figure 4. Map of Focus Area 2— MR2 Wide
Figure 5. Map of Focus Area 3— MR2 Narrow
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 50 March 2013
Figure 6. Map of Focus Area 4— Portage Creek
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 51 March 2013
Figure 7. Map of Focus Area 5— Slough 21
Figure 8. Map of Focus Area 6— Indian River
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 52 March 2013
Figure 9. Map of Focus Area 7— Slough 11
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 53 March 2013
Figure 10. Map of Focus Area 8— Slough 8
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 54 March 2013
Figure 11. Map of Focus Area 9— Slough 6A
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 55 March 2013
Figure 12. Map of Focus Area 10— Whiskers Slough
Sediment Samples for Mercury/Metals in Reservoir Area Data Collection
This portion of the study was designed to gather specific information on the distribution of Susitna
River sediment contaminants of concern in potential source areas. In general, all sediment samples will
be taken from sheltered backwater areas, downstream of islands, and in similar riverine locations in
which water currents are slowed, favoring accumulation of finer sediment along the channel bottom.
Samples will be collected just below and above the proposed dam site. Additional samples will be
collected near the mouth of tributaries near the proposed dam site, including Fog, Deadman, Watana,
Tsusena, Kosina, Jay, and Goose creeks, and the Oshetna River. In-situ water quality parameters will
be measured at all sediment sample locations. Table 13 summarizes the sediment sampling locations.
GPS coordinates will be collected at each sampling location during the sampling event and this QAPP
will be updated as necessary. Three sediment samples will be collected per site and combined for
analysis. The purpose of this sampling will be to determine where metals, if found in the water or
sediment, originate in the drainage. Toxics modeling will be conducted to address potential for
bioavailability in resident aquatic life. Comparison of bioaccumulation of metals in tissue analysis with
results from sediment samples will inform on potential for transfer mechanisms between source and
fate.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 56 March 2013
Table 13: Sediment Sampling Site Locations
Susitna River Mile Description Latitude
(decimal degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
TBD Susitna below Watana Dam site TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Susitna above Watana Dam site TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Fog Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Deadman Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Watana Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Tsusena Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Kosina Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Jay Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Goose Creek TBD on site TBD on site
TBD Mouth of Oshetna River TBD on site TBD on site
Baseline Metals Levels in Fish Tissue
Two screening level tasks will be conducted to determine baseline metals levels in fish tissue. The
first will be for methyl mercury in sport fish. Methyl mercury bioaccumulates and the highest
concentrations are typically in the muscle tissue of adult predatory fish. Final determination of tissue
type(s) for analysis will be coordinated with ADEC’s Division of Environmental Health and guidance
on fish tissue sampling.
Detection of mercury in fish tissue and sediment will prompt further study of naturally occurring
concentrations in soils and plants and how parent geology contributes to concentrations of this native
element in both compartments of the landscape. The focused study will estimate the extent and
magnitude of mercury contamination so that an estimate of increased bioavailability might be made
once the reservoir inundates areas where high concentrations of mercury are sequestered. Detectable
concentrations of mercury may prompt additional sampling and analysis of tissues in the benthic
macroinvertebrate community. The bio-magnification of mercury impact from sediments and plants to
the fish community may be facilitated through consumption of impacted food sources like the benthic
macroinvertebrates. Impact of this component of a trophic level may also be a conduit for mercury
biomagnification in waterfowl and other wildlife that consume this food source.
B.1.3 Identify the Site-Specific Sample Collection Location(s), Parameters to be Measured and
Frequencies of Collection
Baseline water quality data collection will be at the locations in bold in Table 12. The initial sampling
will be expanded if general water quality, metals in surface water, or metals in fish tissue exceed
criteria or thresholds. Additional contiguous sample sites will be visited on this list beginning the
following sampling month wherever criteria or thresholds have been exceeded by individual
parameters. This proposed spacing follows accepted practice when segmenting large river systems for
development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) water quality models. Sampling during winter
months will be focused on locations where flow data is currently collected (or was historically
collected by the USGS) and will be used for water quality modeling.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 57 March 2013
Water quality collection can be broken into two components: in-situ water quality sampling and
general water quality sampling. In-situ water quality sampling consists of on-site monthly
measurements of physical parameters at site locations using field equipment. General water quality
sampling will consist of monthly grab samples that will be sent to an off-site laboratory for analysis. In
general, these samples represent water quality components that cannot be easily measured in-situ, such
as metals concentrations, nitrates, etc.
Water quality samples will be analyzed for several parameters reported in Table 14. Metals
monitoring for total and dissolved fractions in surface water include the full set of parameters used by
ADEC in fish health consumption screening. The creation of a reservoir and potential alteration of
surface water downstream of the proposed dam site may change characteristics of groundwater in the
upper and middle Susitna basin. The water quality parameters identified in Table 14 will address the
influence surface water may have on adjoining groundwater supplies in the vicinity of each sampling
site. Changes to groundwater quality may have an effect on drinking water supplies so several
parameters included on the inorganic chemical contaminants list have been included as part of this
sampling program (ADEC 2003). The criteria that will be used for comparison with sampling results
are the drinking water primary maximum contaminant levels. Additional parameters will be measured
from all 17 sites in a single survey that occurs during low water conditions (e.g., August/September) in
the Susitna basin.
The following is a list of pollutants for which Alaska Water Quality Standards has established water
quality criteria (18 ACC 70.020(b)) for protecting designated uses in freshwater for monitoring
activities in this study:
• Continuous temperature monitoring program
o Temperature, included as part of the continuous temperature monitoring program.
• In-situ monitoring program
o pH, included as part of the monthly water quality sampling routine.
o Color, categorical observation.
o Residues, categorical assessment (floating solids, debris, sludge, deposits, foam, or scum).
• General water quality program
o Dissolved gas, included in the monitoring program (Dissolved Oxygen).
o Dissolved inorganic substances (Total Dissolved Solids), included in monthly monitoring.
o Turbidity, included as part of the monthly water quality sampling routine.
o Toxic and other deleterious organic and inorganic, included in monitoring for inorganic
metals and mercury/methyl-mercury (organometals).
• One time survey
o Fecal coliform bacteria, included in monthly monitoring.
o Sediment, included in assessing mercury and other metals from sediments.
o Petroleum Hydrocarbons, oil, and grease, included in a one-time survey.
o Radioactivity; radionuclide concentrations to be generated from surface water samples.
o Toxic and other deleterious organic and inorganic, already included in monitoring for
inorganic metals and mercury/methyl-mercury (organometals).
Water quality parameters listed above in the “one-time survey” category that exceed Alaska Water
Quality Standards will be collected in succeeding months and will trigger a more intensive
investigation.
Sediment samples will be analyzed for total metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, and zinc (Table 14). In addition, grain size and TOC
will be included to evaluate whether these parameters are predictors for elevated metal concentrations.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 58 March 2013
Most of the contaminants of interest are typically associated with fine sediments, rather than with
coarse-grained sandy sediment or rocky substrates. Therefore, the goal of the sampling will be to
obtain sediments with at least 5 percent fines (i.e., particle size less than 0.0025 inches [63
micrometers], or passing through a #230 sieve). At some locations, however, larger-sized sediment
may be all that are available. Field parameters (temperature, DO, pH, conductivity, etc.) will also be
measured in water directly above sediment sampling locations during the time of sediment sample
collection (Table 14).
Table 14: Water Quality and Sediment Sample Schedule, Baseline.
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
WATER SAMPLING
Susitna
Station (RM
25.8)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Readionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Yentna River
(RM 28.0)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna abv.
Yentna (RM
29.5)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or 3 observations
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 59 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Sept
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Deshka River
(RM 40.6)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna (RM
55.0)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna @
Parks Hwy
East (RM
83.8)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or 3 observations
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 60 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Sept
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Talkeetna
River (RM
97.2)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Chulitna
River (RM
98.1)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Talkeetna
(RM 103.0)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or 3 observations
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 61 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Sept
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Curry
Fishwheel
Camp (RM
120.7)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Gold Creek
(RM 136.8)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Indian River
(RM 138.6)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or 3 observations
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 62 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Sept
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna abv.
Indian River
(RM 138.7)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna abv.
Portage
Creek (RM
148.8)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Portage
Creek (RM
148.8)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or 3 observations
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 63 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Sept
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna @
Watana Dam
Site (RM
184.5)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
Susitna near
Cantwell
(RM 223.7)
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential, Color
In-situ Monthly June-
Sept
3 profiles;
3 (Turbidity,
Color)
Residues In-situ Once Aug or
Sept 3 observations
Hardness, Alkalinity, Nitrate/Nitrite,
Ammonia as N, TKN, TP, Ortho-P,
Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC,
Total & Dissolved Metals (As, Ba,
Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mg,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Tl, V, Zn)
Grab Monthly June-
Sept 6*
TOC, Fecal Coliform, BTEX,
PAHs, Total & Dissolved Metals
(Al, Cr, Se), Radionuclides
Grab Once Aug or
Sept 6*
SEDIMENT SAMPLING
Susitna
below
Watana Dam
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 64 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
site Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Susitna abv.
Watana Dam
site
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Fog Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Deadman
Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Watana
Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Tsusena
Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Kosina Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of Jay
Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Goose Creek
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 65 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
Mouth of
Oshetna
River
Temp., DO, pH, Specific
Conductance, Turbidity, Redox
Potential
In-situ Once Aug or
Sept
3 (one at each
sediment grab
location)
Total Metals (Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Hg, Zn), TOC, Grain Size
Grab-
Sediment Once Aug or
Sept 3
*Baseline WQ samples will be collected along a transect at each sample location. Samples will be collected at 3 equidistant
locations along each transect and at two depths (top and bottom) if water depth is greater than 5ft (1.5 m). If water depth at
each sampling point along the transect is less than 4ft (1.5m) then only a top sample will be collected. Top (or surface)
samples will be collected at 0.5 m below water surface and bottom samples will be collected 0.5 m above the bottom.
The Focus Areas will have a higher density of sampling locations, in contrast to the mainstem network,
so that prediction of change in water quality conditions from Project operations can be made with a
higher degree of resolution. The resolution expected for predicting conditions will be as short as 100-
meter (m) longitudinal distances within the Focus Areas. Depending on the length of the Focus Area,
transects will be spaced every 100 m to 500 m and water quality samples collected at three locations
along each transect. Proposed transects for each Focus Area are shown in Figures 3-12 (thin red lines).
The collection points along a transect will be in open water areas and have 3 to 5 collection points.
These will be discrete samples taken at each collection point.
Table 15: Water Quality Sample Schedule, Focus Areas.
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Focus Area 1
– Below
Dam
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
19 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
19 Surface Water
Focus Area 2
– MR2 Wide
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Focus Area 3
– MR2 Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
14 Surface Water
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 66 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
Narrow Sept.)
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Focus Area 4
– Portage
Creek
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
10 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
10 Surface Water
Focus Area 5
– Slough 21
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
15 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
15 Surface Water
Focus Area 6
– Indian
River
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Focus Area 7
– Slough 11
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Focus Area 8
– Slough 8
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, Grab Every 2 6 weeks 14 Surface Water
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 67 March 2013
Site Parameters to be Measured Sample
Type
Sampling
Frequency
Sample
Time
Total No. of
Measurements
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
weeks (June-
Sept.)
Focus Area 9
– Slough 6A
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
14 Surface Water
Focus Area
10 –
Whiskers
Slough
Temp., DO, Conductivity, pH In-situ Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
16 Surface Water
Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite,
TKN, TP, Ortho-P, Hg (Total),
Methyl-mercury (dissolved), Al
(total & dissolved), Fe (total &
dissolved)
Grab Every 2
weeks
6 weeks
(June-
Sept.)
16 Surface Water
Fish tissue samples will be analyzed for methyl and total mercury. Liver samples will also be collected
from burbot and analyzed for mercury, methyl-mercury, arsenic, cadmium, and selenium. Target fish
species in the vicinity of the Susitna-Watana Reservoir will be Dolly Varden, Arctic grayling, long
nose sucker, lake trout, whitefish species, burbot and resident rainbow trout. Fish samples will be
submitted to a state-certified analytical laboratory for individual fish muscle tissue analysis. Results
will be reported with respect to applicable State and federal standards.
Results from fish tissue analysis will also be used as a baseline for determining how the proposed
Project may increase the potential of current metals concentrations to become bioavailable. The
projected water conditions in the reservoir will be estimated and current results for metals
concentrations re-evaluated for determining potential toxicities to resident and anadromous fish
species.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 68 March 2013
B.2 SAMPLING METHOD REQUIREMENTS
The laboratory will have at a minimum, National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NELAP) Certification in order to generate credible data for use by state, federal, and tribal regulatory
programs for evaluating current and future water quality conditions.
B.2.1 Sample Types
Samples collected as part of the Baseline Water Quality Monitoring Study, in accordance with this
QAPP, will be one of the following types:
• In-situ; includes all field measurements collected with a multi-parameter water quality sonde
(i.e. Hydrolab®, or YSI®) and Hanna Instruments HI 98703 Portable Turbidity Meter.
• Grab; includes both water and sediment grab samples. Baseline water quality grab samples
will be collected at distinct points along a transect at each sample location and at discrete
depths, (0.5 m from water surface and 0.5 m from river bottom were applicable). Grab samples
will be collected in the Focus Areas at distinct points along a transect (surface samples only) as
well as from each piezometer at the end of each transect.
• Fish Tissue; includes fish tissues samples collected from target fish species.
Field personnel will record on the Chain-of-Custody (COC) forms as well as in the field log book and
field data sheets the type of sample collected at each monitoring location. This information will be
included in the field log book and data sheets along with sample date, time, location, etc.
B.2.2 Sample Containers and Equipment
All sampling equipment and sample containers will be cleaned according to the equipment
specifications and/or the analytical laboratory. Bottles supplied by a laboratory will be pre-cleaned.
Bottles supplied by the laboratory with sample preservative will never be rinsed and filled with the
sample once. Bottles without a preservative will be rinsed three times with sample water prior to
collection of the sample.
All samples collected will be stored immediately following collection in a cooler and kept cool. A
COC form will accompany all samples and a strict written record will be documented tracking location
and possession of the sample at all time. A courier will collect the samples every day from field
personnel or Field Operations Project Manager and will hand deliver samples to the analytical
laboratory within maximum holding times.
Table 16 lists container, sample size, preservation and/or filtration requirements, and maximum
holding times for parameters to be analyzed in this study. Samples will not be field filtered but deliver
to the contracted laboratory within the maximum holding time for filtration. Field filtration would be
extremely difficult given the remote conditions of the project and may introduce unexpected
contamination of samples.
Table 16: Preservation and Holding Times for the Analysis of Samples
Analyses Matrix Container Preservative Holding Time
Total Metals - Al, As, Ba, Be, Cd,
Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Hg,
Mo, Ni, Se, Tl, V, Zn
Water 250-ml HDPE HNO3 (pH<2),
Cool to 0-6 °C
6 months (preserved);
28 days for Hg
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 69 March 2013
Dissolved Metals - Al, As, Ba, Be,
Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn,
Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Tl, V, Zn
Water 250-ml HDPE
Combine with
metals
HNO3 (pH<2),
Cool to 0-6 °C
(lab filtered; field filter
only if absolutely
necessary)
24 hours for unfiltered;
6 months for
preserved/filtered;
28 days for Hg
Hardness Water Cool to 0-6 °C 6 months
Alkalinity Water
500-ml HDPE Cool to 0-6 °C
14 days
Total Dissolved Solids Water 7 days
Turbidity Water 48 hours
Total Suspended Solids Water 1-L HDPE Cool to 0-6 °C 7 days
Nitrate/Nitrite Water 60-ml HDPE Cool to 0-6 °C 48 hours
Nitrate+Nitrite Water 60-ml HDPE H2SO4 (pH<2),
Cool to 0-6 °C 28 days
Ammonia as N Water
250-ml HDPE H2SO4 (pH<2),
Cool to 0-6 °C
28 days
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Water 28 days
Total Phosphorus Water 28 days
Ortho-phosphate Water 125-ml HDPE Cool to 0-6 °C
(lab filter)
24 hours for filtration;
48 hours filtered
Chlorophyll a Water 1-L amber
HDPE
Cool to 0-6 °C; kept in
dark 24 hours for filtration
TOC Water 120-ml amber HCL (pH<2)
Cool to 0-6 °C 28 days
DOC Water 120-ml amber
HCL (pH<2)
Cool to 0-6 °C
(lab filtered, field filter
only if absolutely
necessary)
28 days
Fecal Coliform Water 125-ml sterile Na2S203; 0-6° C 8 hours
PAHs (TAqH) Water 2 x 1 liter
Amber glass Cool to 0-6 °C 7 days
BTEX (TAH) Water
3x40-ml
amber VOA
vials
HCl (pH<2)
Cool to 0-6 °C 14 days
Radioactivity Water 10-Liter poly
“cubie”
Cool to 0-6 °C
(lab will preserve w/
HNO3 before ship)
6 months
Metals - Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn
& Hg Sediment 4-oz amber
glass Cool to 0-6 °C 6 months
28 days for Hg
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 70 March 2013
Total Organic Carbon Sediment 28 days
Sediment Grain Size Sediment
8-oz amber
glass if fine
5 gallon
bucket if
coarse
Cool to 0-6 °C NA
Total & Methyl -- Mercury Fish
Tissue
Zip-type
plastic bag
0-4 °C during
shipment; ≤ -15°C in
lab
1 year
B.2.3 Sampling Methods
Water Quality Data Collection: Monitoring Protocol
Water quality grab samples will be collected during each site visit along a transect of the stream
channel/water body, using methods consistent with ADEC and EPA protocols for sampling ambient
water and trace metal water quality criteria.
Similar sample collection techniques will be utilized for both baseline water quality sample collection
at the 17 sites listed in Table 12 as well as the open water sites within the Focus Areas.
Mainstem areas of the river not immediately influenced by a tributary will be characterized with a
single transect. Areas of the mainstem with an upstream tributary that may influence the nearshore
zone or that are well-mixed with the mainstem will be characterized by collecting samples at two
transect locations: in the tributary and in the mainstem upstream of the tributary confluence. Samples
will be collected at 3 equi-distant locations along each transect (i.e. 25% from left bank, 50% from left
bank, and 75% from left bank). Samples will be collected from a depth of 0.5 meters below the
surface as well as 0.5 meters above the bottom if water depth at that sample location is 5 ft (1.5 m) or
greater. If water depth at the sample location is less than 5 ft (1.5 m) then only a surface sample (0.5
meters below the surface will be collected). This will ensure that variations in concentrations,
especially metals, are captured and adequately characterized throughout the study area.
These samples will be collected on approximately a monthly basis (four samples from June to
September). The period for collecting surface water samples will begin at ice break-up and extend to
beginning of ice formation on the river. Limited winter sampling (once in December 2013, and again
in March 2014) will be conducted where existing or historic USGS sites are located. Winter sampling
locations are still under consideration, and QAPP amendments will occur at a later date.
Review of existing data (URS 2011) indicates that few exceedances occur with metals concentrations
during the winter months. If the 2013 data sets suggest that mercury concentrations exceed criteria or
thresholds, then an expanded 2014 water quality monitoring program will be conducted to characterize
conditions on a monthly basis throughout the winter months.
Variation of water quality in a river cross-section is often significant and is most likely to occur
because of incomplete mixing of upstream tributary inflows, point-source discharges, or variations in
velocity and channel geometry. Water quality profiles at each location on each transect will be
conducted for field water quality parameters (e.g., temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and
conductivity) to determine the extent of vertical and lateral mixing. Field measurements will be
collected at 0.5 m increments throughout the water column.
There are several methods that could be used to collected water quality samples. Two methods for
water collection are discussed below and will be used at sites where appropriate. Field personnel will
be equipped to perform either method and/or make modifications based on site conditions, water
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 71 March 2013
velocity, and flow. It is unknown at this time which sampling technique is more effective at a site and
will be dictated by site conditions on the Susitna River and tributaries.
Water quality samples will be collected using a peristaltic pump and non-reactive tubing system. A
peristaltic pump will be used to pump water at each sample site into the sample containers. In order to
efficiently collect the amount of sample volume needed, a high capacity peristaltic pump will be used.
Tygon® tubing or other similar non-reactive tubing will be used with the pump to collect the sample.
The sample tubing will be cable tied to an adjustable pole which is affixed to the side or bow of the
boat. The pole will be used to keep the tubing vertical in the water column and ensure that samples are
collected at the proper depth. The tubing could also be attached to a davit cable and lowered into the
water column if the boat is equipped with a davit/cable/winch system. Once the tubing is positioned at
the right depth the pump will be turned on and will run for several seconds to flush/rinse the
pump/tubing system. Samples will be collected from the tubing and into the proper sample containers
and labeled accordingly. Sample containers that do not contain preservative will be rinsed three times
will sample water prior to collecting the sample.
Some sample locations may be located in water depths less than 3 ft (< 1m) deep and may be difficult
to reach by boat. If this is the case, field personnel will collect samples by wading into the river. This
sample method is to only be done if field conditions are safe and wading into the river does not
endanger or put at risk field personnel.
Given the volume of water needed to be collected at each sample site, the peristaltic pump and tubing
sample method will be the most efficient collection method. Wading into the river to collect individual
samples will be time consuming and inefficient, but may be necessary given site conditions.
Samples will be delivered to ADEC approved laboratories within the holding time frame by a courier
that will pick up samples from field personnel each day and hand deliver to laboratory ASAP. Each
batch of samples will have a separate completed COC sheet that will document and track sample
possession at all times. A field duplicate will be collected for 10 percent of samples (i.e., 1 for every
10 water grab samples). Laboratory quality control samples including duplicate, spiked, and blank
samples will be prepared and processed by the laboratory.
Field filtering of dissolved metals, chl a, DOC, or ortho-P will not occur given the remoteness of the
project site and the field conditions. Instead, all samples will be delivered to the laboratory within 24
hours of collection and be filtered within the laboratory. This will also help to eliminate any
contamination of samples that field filtering in remote locations can introduce. It is not anticipated that
field personnel will have a clean area to set up filtering apparatus to process the volume of samples that
will be collected daily.
Sample numbers (IDs) will be recorded on field data sheets immediately after collection. Samples
intended for the laboratory will be stored/preserved in coolers and kept under the custody of the field
team at all times. Samples will be transported to the laboratory in coolers with ice and cooled to
approximately 4 °C. Chain of custody records and other sampling documentation will be kept in sealed
plastic bags (Ziploc®) and taped inside the lid of the coolers prior to shipment. Packaging, marking,
labeling, and shipping of samples will be in compliance with all regulations promulgated by the U. S.
Department of Transportation in the Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR 171-177.
In-Situ Water Quality Sampling
During each site visit, in situ measurements of dissolved oxygen, pH, specific conductance, redox
potential, turbidity, and water temperature will be made. A Hanna Instruments HI 98703 Portable
Turbidity Meter will be used to measure turbidity, while a Hydrolab® datasonde (MS5) will be used to
measure the remaining field parameters during each site visit. In order to collect water column profiles
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 72 March 2013
for in situ measurements, at each sample location the Hydrolab® will be attached to an adjustable pole
affixed to the boat or the cable of a davit/cable/winch system and lowered into the water column.
Measurements will be collected at every 0.5 m depths until 0.5 m above the river bottom. It is
imperative that the datasonde be kept vertical in the water column while measurements are being
collected. The adjustable pole or davit/cable/winch system will ensure the datasonde is vertical.
Continuous turbidity measurement may be conducted with the Hydrolab® datasonde at select
locations (e.g., former/current USGS sites where turbidity data are available from the 1980s) and
operated during summer and winter conditions. The following list of former and current USGS
mainstem Susitna River monitoring sites will be considered for continuous turbidity monitoring:
Susitna Station, Sunshine, Gold Creek, Tsusena Creek, and near Cantwell. These locations have
historic and current flow data that will be used in water quality modeling (Section 5.6) of effects on
turbidity from Project operations. Continuous logging of water quality parameters using a multi-
parameter probe (e.g., temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity) may be placed at Focus
Area locations (identified in Section 5.5.4.5. The period of deployment will be focused on summer
months June through September (four months) as water conditions permit deployment and routine
download of data. Maintenance of a multi-parameter probe and risk from damage is high during winter
months. Also, freezing conditions will damage sensor apparatus and the logging unit if enclosed by
formation of ice.
Standard techniques for pre- and post-sampling calibration of in situ instrumentation will be used to
ensure quality of data generation and will follow accepted practice. Calibration procedures will follow
manufacturer’s instructions. Calibration of in situ instruments for all field parameters (DO, pH,
conductivity, and turbidity) will occur prior to the beginning of each day’s field activities and will be
checked every day following completion of sampling activities. Temperature probes on the
Hydrolab® datasondes are calibrated at the manufacturer and will not be calibrated in the field.
However, temperatures recorded in situ with the datasonde will be compared to continuous
temperature data collected with the Onset Tidbits®. Calibration procedures for the continuous
temperature loggers can be found in the approved 2012 SAP/QAPP for Water Temperature and
Monitoring and Meteorological Station Installation for Use in Water Quality Model Calibration and
Development: Susitna River, South-central Alaska (AEA 2012). Calibration data, both pre- and post-
sampling, will be recorded on a calibration form by field personnel. Parameters will be considered
within calibration range if the instrument reading is within 10 percent of the calibration standard value.
If calibration failure is observed during a site visit, field data will be corrected according to equipment
manufacturer’s instructions and calibration records.
The Hydrolab® datasonde which will be used to collected in situ field measurements includes an
optical DO sensor (LDO) and is calibrated based on barometric pressure at the project site. After
calibration of the LDO sensor there is no need for correction of DO measurements to local barometric
pressure. However, the LDO sensor will need to be calibrated every day prior to sampling activities
due to changes in atmospheric pressure and weather at the project.
pH standards 7 and 10 will be used to perform the calibration of the pH probe on the Hydrolab®
datasonde, For conductivity, a conductivity standard of 1412 µS/cm will be used.
Sediment Samples for Mercury/Metals in Reservoir Area Data Collection: Monitoring Protocol
Sediment samples will be collected using an Ekman dredge or a modified Van Veen grab sampler.
Sampling devices will be deployed from the boat if water depth is sufficient. Samples may also be
collected by wading into shallow near shore areas. To the extent possible, samples will consist of the
top 6 inches (15 centimeters) of sediment. Comparison of results from the Susitna drainage will be
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 73 March 2013
made with other studies for Blue Lake, Eklutna Lake, and Bradley Lake when similar data are
available and where physical settings are comparable.
Sediment samples will be stored in cooler and kept under the custody of the field times at all times.
Samples will be transported to the laboratory in coolers with ice and cooled to approximately 4 °C.
Chain of custody records and other sampling documentation will be kept in sealed plastic bags
(Ziploc®) and taped inside the lid of the coolers prior to shipment. Packaging, marking, labeling, and
shipping of samples will be in compliance with all regulations promulgated by the U. S. Department of
Transportation in the Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR 171-177.
Baseline Metals Levels in Fish Tissue: Monitoring Protocol
Target fish species in the vicinity of the Susitna-Watana Reservoir will be Dolly Varden, Arctic
grayling, whitefish species, burbot, long nose sucker, lake trout, and resident rainbow trout. If
possible, filets will be sampled from 7 adult individuals from each species. Body size targeted for
collection will represent the non-anadromous phase of each species life cycle (e.g., Dolly Varden will
be 3.5 to 5 inches [90 to 125 millimeters] total length to represent the resident portion of the life cycle).
Collection times for fish samples will occur in late August and early September 2013. Filet samples
will be analyzed for methyl and total mercury. Liver samples will also be collected from burbot and
analyzed for mercury, methyl-mercury, arsenic, cadmium, and selenium.
Field procedures will be consistent with those outlined in applicable ADEC and/or EPA sampling
protocols (USEPA 2000). Clean nylon nets and polyethylene-gloves will be used during fish tissue
collection. The species, fork length, and weight of each fish will be recorded. Fish will be placed in
Teflon® sheets and into zipper-closure bags and placed immediately on ice. Fish samples will be
submitted to a state-certified analytical laboratory for individual fish muscle tissue analysis. Results
will be reported with respect to applicable state and federal standards.
Water Sample Processing
Field equipment used for collection, measurement, and testing will be subject to a strict program of
control, calibration, adjustment and maintenance. The pump/tygon tubing used to collect surface water
samples will be routinely inspected to verify that it is working properly. The Van Veen grab sampler
used to collect sediment sample will also be routinely inspected. Routine maintenance of all sample
equipment will be conducted prior to each sampling event. Maintenance will include a visual
inspection that all parts are present, attached correctly and devoid of any obvious contamination. . The
Field Operations Project Manager will coordinate ordering replacement parts and repairing samplers.
Spare sampling equipment will be available on-site in case of primary equipment failure.
QA/QC and Blank Samples and Frequency
Quality control activities in the field will consist of the following items:
• Adherence to documented procedures in this SAP/QAPP;
• Cross-checking of field measurements and recording to ensure consistency and accuracy; and
• Comprehensive documentation of field observations, sample collection and sample
identification information.
Multiple field quality control samples will be collected: one blind field duplicate sample will be
collected for every ten sites sampled and sent to the laboratory to test for precision (e.g., repeatability)
of analytical procedures. A trip blank will be submitted to the lab to ensure that equipment handling
and transport procedures do not introduce contamination to transported project samples. Rinsate blanks
will be collected at different periods throughout the program to assure that cross-contamination
between samples does not occur.
Field Sampling Decisions
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 74 March 2013
Damage to equipment from wildlife, physical forces of the river, or equipment failure will be
addressed using the following protocol. Field sampling decisions to deviate or modify field sampling
locations or methods will only be made with the approval of the field crew chief. The field crew chief
will document the decision on the field note sheets, and email a copy of the sheet or telephone the
information to the study manager. If the field decision is large enough in scale to significantly affect
the study’s data, scope, schedule or budget, the field crew chief is authorized to stop work until further
contact and coordination with the study manager can be performed.
B.3 SAMPLE HANDLING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY REQUIREMENTS
B.3.1 Sampling Procedures
See Section B.2 of this QAPP – Sampling Method Requirements
Field Logbook and Field Log Forms
Thorough documentation of all field sample collection is necessary for proper processing of data and,
ultimately, for interpreting study results. Field sample collection will be documented in writing, on
forms included in (to be included in Appendix B), as well as on the following forms and labels:
• A field log notebook for general observations and notes
• A Field Data Record Form that contains information about observations and measurements
made and samples collected at the site
• Checklists for each sampling event, sampling point, and sampling time.
Copies of the field log books and physical characterization/water quality data sheets and sampling
checklists will be supplied to the Field Operations Project Manager at the close of each sampling
event. These data will be used in conjunction with inspection checklists to compile the sampling event
reports. Formal reports that are generated from the data will be subject to technical and editorial review
before submission to AEA, and will be maintained at URS’s Anchorage, AK and Tt’s Seattle, WA,
officse in the central file (disk and hard copy). The data reports will include a summary of the types of
data collected, sampling dates, and any problems or anomalies observed during sample collection.
Samples will be documented and tracked on Field Data Record forms, Sample Identification labels,
and COC records. The Field Task Leaders (one for each team) will be responsible for ensuring that
these forms are completed and reviewed for correctness and completeness by the designated field QC
Officer (Field Operations Project Manager). URS and Tt will maintain copies of these forms in the
project files. A sampling report will be prepared following each sampling event. Another person will
manually check data entered into any spreadsheet or other format against the original source to ensure
accurate data entry. If there is any indication that requirements for sample integrity or data quality have
not been met (for samples or measurements collected by URS and Tt), the QAO will be notified
immediately (with an accompanying explanation of the problems encountered).
Photographic Records
Recording of sampling locations will be documented with photographs using a conventional photo-
point procedure. Photographs will be taken at each sampling location and the photograph number and
the associated date, description of the photograph, site identification number and GPS coordinates will
be recorded on the Field Data Form for each site. The photos will be stored as digital images and
maintained as files, as appropriate, in repositories for information and data used in preparing any
reports and documents during the project. Digital photos will be submitted with an index for each set
of photographs, identifying the project, site identification number and a description of the photograph.
Field Data Recording
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 75 March 2013
In-situ field data measurements will be recorded immediately following collection, both, electronically
(stored within Hydrolab Surveyor) and on the Field Data form for each station. Field data sheets will
be printed on Rite in the Rain paper. Promptly following each sample event, scanned copies of field
data sheets will be made and stored electronically.
Each sample bottle will have a waterproof sample identification label, tag, or permanent marker
identification. All sample bottles will be labeled with an indelible marker before the time of collection.
Sample labels will include station designation, date, time, collector’s initials, and sample/analysis type.
Special analyses to be performed and any pertinent remarks will also be recorded on the label.
B.3.2 Sample Custody Procedures
Chain of custody (COC) can be defined as a systematic procedure for tracking a sample or datum from
its origin to its final use. Chain of custody procedures is necessary to ensure thorough documentation
of handling for each sample, from field collection to data analysis. The purpose of this procedure is to
minimize errors, maintain sample integrity, and protect the quality of data collected.
A data sample is considered to be under a person's custody if it is:
• In the individual's physical possession
• In the individual's sight
• Secured in a tamper-proof way by that person, or
• Secured by the person in an area that is restricted to authorized personnel
Elements of chain-of-custody include:
• Sample identification
• Security seals and locks
• Security procedures
• Chain-of-custody record
The analytical laboratory will provide blank COCs with each bottle order and provide scanned copies
of finished COCs with sample results. Each batch of samples will have a separate completed COC
sheet that will document and track sample possession at all times.
B.3.3 Shipping Requirements
Packaging, marking, labeling, and shipping of samples will comply with all regulations promulgated
by the U.S. Department of Transportation in 49 CFR 171-177.
Samples for laboratory analysis will be collected in containers appropriate for the analytes of interest,
filtered if necessary (most filtering of samples will occur in the laboratory) and will be properly
preserved until delivery to the analytical laboratory. All samples will be immediately placed in coolers
and packed with gel ice after sampling and will remain chilled to 4°C (±2°C) during transportation to
the contract laboratory. All samples will be accompanied with completed COC forms when shipped,
and coolers will be sealed with signed and dated fiber tape for shipment. Tetra Tech maintains specific
SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) for sample chain of custody, sample shipping, and supporting
sample documentation.
B.4 ANALYTICAL METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with EPA-approved analytical procedures and in
compliance with 40 CFR Part 136, Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for Analysis of Pollutants.
Section A7 of this QAPP, Table 10, lists all parameters of concern, approved analytical methods,
method-specific detection and reporting limits, and accuracy and precision values applicable to this
project.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 76 March 2013
Under direction of the Principal Manager and the Field Operations Project Manager, project staff will
ensure that all equipment and sampling kits used in the field and laboratories use EPA CWA approved
methods. The project’s QA officer will verify that only EPA CWA approved methods (or in specific
incidences ADEC DOW pre- approved methods) are used.
Laboratory Operations Documentation
Laboratory data results will be recorded on laboratory data sheets, bench sheets and/or in laboratory
logbooks for each sampling event. These records as well as control charts, logbook records of
equipment maintenance records, calibration and quality control checks, such as preparation and use of
standard solutions, inventory of supplies and consumables, check-in of equipment, equipment parts
and chemicals will be kept on file at the laboratory.
Any procedural or equipment problems will be recorded in the field notebooks. Any deviation from
this SAP/QAPP will also be noted in the field notebooks. Data results will include information on field
and/or laboratory QA/QC problems and corrective actions.
Standard turnaround time for the analytical samples taken to the contract laboratory will be seven to
ten working days and will not exceed twenty-two working days for reporting of data.
Chain-of-custody forms will be kept with the sample during transport and will accompany data results
back to URS and Tt. Training records and data review records will be kept on file at URS and the
contract laboratory and will be available on request. All sample analysis records and documents are
kept at the contract laboratory and will be available to AEA for inspection at any time. In addition to
any written report, data collected for the project will be provided electronically via a CD-ROM or e-
mail ZIP file format.
All records will be retained by the contract laboratory for ten years. All project records at AEA, URS,
and Tt are retained permanently.
B.5 QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
Quality Control (QC) is the overall system of technical activities that measures the attributes and
performance of a process, item, or service against defined standards to verify that they meet the
monitoring project’s data quality objectives.
Data quality is addressed, in part, by consistent performance of valid procedures documented in the
SOPs (Appendix A to this QAPP). It is enhanced by the training and experience of project staff and
documentation of project activities. This QAPP, including its appendices, will be distributed to all
sampling personnel. Prior to the start of sampling activities (June 2013) all field personnel will be
trained and debriefed on field collection procedures, Field data forms, and all types of data/samples to
be collected during the 2013/2014 sampling period. A QC Officer (or equivalent) will ensure that
samples are taken according to the established protocols and that all forms, checklists, and
measurements are recorded and completed correctly during the sampling event.
B.5.1 Field Quality Control (QC) Measures
QC measures that field personnel will perform in the field include but are not limited to:
• Proper cleaning of sample containers and sampling equipment.
• Maintenance, cleaning and calibration of field equipment/kits per the manufacturer’s and/or
laboratory’s specification, and field SOPs.
• Chemical reagents and standard reference materials used prior to expiration dates.
• Proper field sample collection and analysis techniques.
• Correct sample labeling and data entry.
• Proper sample handling and shipping/transport techniques.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 77 March 2013
• Field replicate samples (blind to the laboratory), e.g. 1 replicate/10 samples).
• Field replicate measurements (e.g. 1 replicate measurement/10 field measurements).
Table 17 summarizes the field QC requirements for this project.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 78 March 2013
Table 17: Field Quality Control Sample Requirements
Field Quality Control Sample Measurement
Parameter
Frequency
QC Acceptance
Criteria Limits Frequency of
Occurrence
Total # of
QC Type
Samples
Field Blank
All
laboratory-
analyzed
parameters
1 set/20 sites depends on
number of
sample days
< detection limit
for each analyte
Trip Blank
All
laboratory-
analyzed
parameters
1 per set of
coolers/day
depends on
number of
sample days
< detection limit
for each analyte
Field Replicate (Blind to Lab)
All
laboratory-
analyzed
parameters
1 set/20 sites depends on
number of
sample days
< detection limit
for each analyte
Field Replicate Measurement
Temperature 1 replicate
measurements
per 10 field
measurements
(each day)
depends on
water depth
and number
of
measurements
per profile
±0.2°C
DO ±0.4 mg/L
pH ±0.2 units
Conductivity ±10 µS/cm
Turbidity ±2 NTUs
Redox
Potential NA
Calibration Verification Check
Standard
DO 1 per
sampling day
depends on
number of
sample days Within 15% of
calibration
standard
pH
Conductivity
Turbidity
B.5.2 Laboratory Quality Control (QC) Measures
In this section, the Laboratory Quality Control Measures including QC samples collected in the field
for subsequent laboratory analysis as well as method-specific laboratory QC activities are prescribed in
each analytical method’s SOP and in the monitoring project’s QAPP.
Laboratory QC includes the following:
• Laboratory instrumentation calibrated with the analytical procedure.
• Laboratory instrumentation maintained in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s
specifications, the laboratory’s QAP and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs).
• Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates, sample duplicates, calibration verification checks,
surrogate standards, external standards, etc. per the laboratory’s QAP and SOPs.
• Specific QC activities prescribed in the project’s QAPP.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 79 March 2013
• Laboratory data verification and validation prior to sending data results to ADEC and/or
permitted facility.
Contracted laboratories will provide analytical results after verification and validation by the
laboratory QA Officer. The laboratory must provide all relevant QC information with its summary of
data results so that the project manager and project QA officer can perform field data verification and
validation and review the laboratory reports. The Principal Manager reviews these data to ensure that
the required QC measurement criteria have been met. If a QC concern is identified in the review
process, the Project Manager and Project QA Officer will seek additional information from the
contracted laboratory to resolve the issue and take appropriate corrective action.
Table 18 summarizes the field/laboratory QC sample requirements for this project.
Table 18: Field/Laboratory Quality Control Samples
Field/Lab Quality Control
Sample
Measurement
Parameter
Frequency
QC Acceptance
Criteria Limits Frequency
of
Occurrence
Total # of QC
Type Samples
Field Blank
All laboratory
parameters to
be analyzed
1 blank per
3 sample
days
depends on
number of
sample days
<detection limit for
each parameter
Trip Blank
All laboratory
parameters to
be analyzed
1 blank per
3 sample
days
depends on
number of
sample days
<detection limit for
each parameter
Field Replicate
All laboratory
parameters to
be analyzed
1 per 10
samples
collected
(Baseline &
Sediment)
1 per Focus
Area
10 per month
(Baseline WQ)
3 (Sediment)
10 per
sampling event
≤10% of the RPD
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 80 March 2013
B.6 INSTRUMENT/EQUIPMENT TESTING, INSPECTIONAND
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
Periodic regular inspection of equipment and instruments is needed to ensure the satisfactory
performance of the systems. Equipment to be used during the sampling event is listed in the
appropriate SOPs. Before any piece of sampling or measurement equipment is taken into the field, it
will be inspected to ensure that the equipment is appropriate for the task to be performed, all necessary
parts of the equipment are intact, and the equipment is in working order. In addition, the equipment
will be visually inspected before its use. Broken equipment will be labeled “DO NOT USE” and
returned to the URS or Tt office to receive necessary repairs, or it will be disposed of. Backup field
equipment will be available during all field activities in the event of equipment failure.
Field staff will document that required acceptance testing, inspection, and maintenance have been
performed. Records of this documentation will be kept with the instrument/equipment kit. The
objective of preventive maintenance is to ensure the availability and satisfactory performance of the
measurement systems. All field measurement instruments will receive preventive maintenance in
accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.
Contracted and sub-contracted laboratories will follow the testing, inspection and maintenance
procedures required by EPA Clean Water Act approved methods and as stated in the respective
laboratory’s QAP and SOPs. Instrument/equipment testing, and inspection and maintenance
requirements and procedures are located in the contract laboratories approved QA manual and is
available upon request.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 81 March 2013
B.7 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION AND FREQUENCY
Calibrated field instruments will be used for in-field, instantaneous measurement of temperature, DO,
conductivity, pH, turbidity, and redox potential. Instruments will be calibrated in accordance with
manufacturer’s specifications every day prior to the beginning of sampling activities. Post-calibration
verification will be performed on each sampling date following sampling activities. All calibration
activities will be perform at the field office in Talkeetna, AK. Verification of pH measurement
accuracy will be checked against standard solutions (buffer 7 and 10) in the field (if pH drift is
noticeable by field staff) and adjustments made to the meter prior to the next measurement, if
necessary.
The calibration of temperature, DO, conductivity, pH, redox potential, and turbidity instruments will
be checked before and after each sampling event, or as deemed necessary by the multiprobe’s
manufacturer, using certified standard solutions. Field calibrations will be recorded on a field
calibration form (Appendix B). Individual sensors will be considered to be operating correctly if the
instrument reading is within 10 percent of the calibration standard value. If the two values are not
within 10 percent of each other, the probe will be cleaned and recalibrated. If these two values are still
not within 10 percent of each other following cleaning and recalibration, the probe itself will be
replaced.
Refer to Section B.2.3 for further details on field instrument calibration methods and specifics.
Contracted and sub-contracted laboratories will follow the calibration procedures found in its QAP and
the laboratory’s SOPs. Specific calibration procedures for regulated pollutants will be in agreement
with the respective EPA Approved CWA method of analysis. Field and/or laboratory calibration
records will be made available to ADEC upon request.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 82 March 2013
B.8 INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE OF SUPPLIES AND CONSUMABLES
Supplies and consumables are those items necessary to support the sampling and analysis operation.
They include bottleware, calibration solutions, hoses, decontamination supplies, preservatives, and
various types of water (e.g., potable, deionized, organic-free). Upon delivery of supplies, field crews
will ensure that types and quantities of supplies received are consistent with what was ordered, and
with what is indicated on the packing list and invoice for the material. If any discrepancies are found,
the supplier will be contacted immediately.
While preparing for specific sampling events, the field sampling Task Leaders will be responsible for
acquiring and inspecting materials and solutions that will be used for obtaining the samples for field
measurements. Other materials must also meet specific requirements as indicated by the appropriate
manufacturer; for example, only certified standard solutions will be used for the multi-probe
calibration. Buffers and standards will be checked for expiration dates and appearance (correct color).
Field task leaders will clean all sampling equipment (pump and tubing system, multi-probe, depth
sounder, etc.) at the end of each day’s sampling activities with de-ionized water. Field task leaders
will inspect sampling equipment each day prior to the start of sampling activities to ensure all sampling
equipment has been cleaned and prepared for the day.
All sample containers, tubing, filters, etc. provided by a laboratory or by commercial vendor will be
certified clean for the analyses of interest (low level metals and toxics analysis). The sampling team
will take note of the information on the certificate of analysis that accompanies sample containers to
ensure that they meet the specifications and guidance for contaminant-free sample containers for the
analyses of interest. Records will be kept the field office.
No standard solutions, buffers, or other chemical additives shall be used if the expiration date has
passed. The Field Operations Project Manager or his/her designee is responsible to maintain
appropriate records (e.g. logbook entries, checklists, etc.) to verify inspection/acceptance of supplies
and consumables, and restock these supplies and consumables when necessary. These records will be
kept at the field office and at URS’s Anchorage, AK office.
Contracted and sub-contracted laboratories will follow procedures in their laboratory’s QAP and SOPs
for inspection/acceptance of supplies and consumables.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 83 March 2013
B.9 DATA ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS (NON-DIRECT
MEASUREMENTS)
Available existing water quality information was collected and evaluated in Water Quality Data Gap
Analysis (URS, 2011). This data was further examined for its potential relevance and completeness,
and whether the methods used produced information that could be applicable to the anticipated
environmental analysis for the proposed Project. Other sources of information used in the analysis
included that derived from contacts with agency project leaders and database searches. Where
information was determined to be likely insufficient for satisfying environmental analysis
requirements, a potential data gap was identified. The final analysis and identification of data gaps was
used to inform site selection in this project as reported in Section B1.2.
A review of existing data generated by governmental agencies and organizations was used as
background information to evaluate current and past water quality conditions in the Susitna River
drainage. Natural resource agencies were identified and lead staff contacted for location of relevant
information and web sites searched for general description of drainage conditions as well as for water
quality data that could be further analyzed. The following agencies were initially identified for
available information from the Susitna River drainage and contiguous areas:
• Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
• Alaska Department of Fish and Game
• Alaska Department of Natural Resources
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• U.S. Geological Survey
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Fisheries
• Alaska Energy Authority/Alaska Power Authority
• American Geophysical Union
Generally, most of the data discovered and used in the data gap analysis was more than 20 years old.
Many of the documents did not report data quality expressions and so an evaluation for comparability
of data sets was not possible. The exception was the United States Geological Survey (USGS) data
where long-term monitoring at select stations was completed in the drainage. The comparability of
data among USGS stations was not in question, but the lack of DQOs from older data did not enable a
comparison between USGS and other existing data sets. Any interpretations of data close to pollutant
concentration criteria were interpreted as exceeding the standard. This conservative approach was
taken in order to preserve the intent of water quality criteria and to suggest additional studies that
should be conducted in order to advance definitive decisions.
Historical data was used, in part, to determine where water quality exceedance occurred (URS, 2011)
and to identify monitoring sites where additional data was needed for modeling of water quality
conditions. Since quality of data identified from historical records had generally undocumented DQOs,
these data will not be used in the modeling exercise. Rather, the current, proposed data collection will
be used for calibrating the water quality model. Since historical water quality records reflect historical
human activities in the Susitna Basin, they do not indicate how current and recent past activities have
influenced water quality conditions. The lack of DQOs for almost all proposed parameters in this study
(except for USGS field parameters), does not enable these data records to be used for current model
calibration and projections of resulting water quality under various Project operation scenarios.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 84 March 2013
B.10 DATA MANAGEMENT
Samples will be documented and tracked on Field Data Record forms, Sample Identification labels,
and Chain of Custody records. The Field Task Leaders (one for each team identified in Section A.4)
will be responsible for ensuring that these forms are completed and reviewed for correctness and
completeness by the designated field QC Officer. The Water Quality Studies contractor will maintain
copies of these forms in the project files. A sampling report will be prepared following each sampling
event. The Data Manager will identify a staff member from one of the field teams to manually check
data entered into any spreadsheet or other format against the original source to ensure accurate data
entry. If there is any indication that requirements for sample integrity or data quality have not been met
(for samples or measurements collected by Tt), the Tt QA Lead will be notified immediately (with an
accompanying explanation of the problems encountered).
Hard copy data packages will be paginated, fully validated raw data packages that include an analytical
narrative with a signed certification of compliance with this QAPP and all method requirements;
copies of Chain of Custody forms; sample inspection records; laboratory sample and QC results;
calibration summaries; example calculations by parameter; and copies of all sample preparation,
analysis, and standards logs adequate to reconstruct the entire analysis. The CD-ROM data will include
a full copy of the paginated report scanned and stored in portable document format (PDF) for potential
future submission to the client, if requested, and for long-term storage in the project files. Initially, the
full raw data package will be submitted to the Tt QA Lead for assessment of compliance with the
program goals and guidance.
All computer files associated with the project will be stored in a project subdirectory by the Water
Quality Studies Contractors (URS and Tt; subject to regular system backups) and will be copied to disk
for archive for the 5 years subsequent to project completion. The data may eventually be stored using a
data management system specified Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
The success of a monitoring project relies on data and their interpretation. It is critical that data be
available to users and that these data are:
• Of known quality;
• Reliable;
• Aggregated in a manner consistent with their prime use, and
• Accessible to a variety of users.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) of data management begins with the raw data and ends
with a defensible report, preferably through the computerized messaging of raw data.
Data management encompasses and traces the path of the data from their generation to their final use
or storage [e.g., from field measurements and sample collection/recording through transfer of data to
computers (laptops, data acquisition systems, etc.), laboratory analysis, data validation/verification,
QA assessments and reporting of data of known quality]. Data management will include/discuss all
incidence of errors detected during the QA review process and include in annual water quality reports
as well as documented with “qualifiers” in the water quality database.
A Data Management Flow Chart (Figure 13) at the end of this section provides a visual summary
description of the data flow/management process for environmental data collected in support of the
Watana Hydroelectric Project Licensing process.
Various people are responsible for separate or discrete parts of the data management process:
• The sampling team is responsible for field measurements/sample collection and recording of
data and subsequent shipment of samples to laboratories for analyses. They assemble data files,
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 85 March 2013
which includes raw data, calibration information and certificates, QC checks (routine checks),
data flags, sampler comments and meta data where available. These files are assembled and
forwarded for secondary data review by the sampling manager or supervisor.
• Laboratories are responsible to comply with the data quality objectives specified in the QAPP
and as specified in the laboratory QAP and method specific SOPs. Validated sample laboratory
data results with respective analytical method QA/QC results and acceptance criteria are
reported to the sampling manager or project supervisor.
• Secondary reviewers (sampling coordinator/supervisor/project supervisor) are responsible for
QA/QC review, verification and validation of field and laboratory data and data reformatting
as appropriate for reporting to STORET, AQMS, ICIS-NPDES, DROPS (if necessary), and
reporting validated data to the project manager.
• The project QA officer is responsible for performing routine independent reviews of data to
ensure the monitoring projects data quality objectives are being met. Findings and
recommended corrective actions (as appropriate) are reported directly to project management.
• The project manager is responsible for final data certification
• URS/Tt Project Managers/Project QAO conducts a final review (tertiary review) and submits
the validated data to STORET, AQMS, ICIS-NPDES, DROPS as appropriate.
Figure 13: Project Data Management Flow Chart
Field Team Lead
100% check of all
data, logbooks, field
data sheets & initial
data flags, providing
flag rational
Project QA Officer (URS)
Minimum 10% random check of all data, 100% check
of all elevated values and outlier values. Verify QAPP
& SOP compliance Verify and validate flags, SOP
procedural adjustment & Recommendations. Assess
attainment of overall project required MQOs
Field Staff Operator
(appointed by the Field Team Lead)
Data Management Responsibilities
Maintains all log books, field data sheets, QC forms
Calculates concentrations as needed, Conducts
preventative maintenance, calibrations and QC
checks. Ensures all test equipment is in certification
and all SOPs are followed.
Field Data
Data is collected and
recorded on forms,
logbooks computer
files and
concentrations
calculated
Analytical Laboratory Manager
100% check of all field sample request data sheets,
sa mple integrity checks (preservation, temperature and
holding times met). Samples analyzed according to
QAPP approved methods. Sample analysis and
relevant QC results reported.
URS Project Manager
Data review and 10% check of all field
and laboratory data (field notes, sample
field and lab results, QC data
verification/validation and appropriate use
of data flags)
Tt SWG WQ
Technical Lead
Review Data. Report
sample data results per
QAPP requirements,
Data Management Legend
Data reporting
QA Assessments
Data not okay or needs more info
Tt Project
Manager/QA Lead
Reviews Data for
acceptability
URS Project
Chemist
R2 Resources
Data Manager
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 86 March 2013
B.10.1 Data Storage and Retention
Data management files will be stored on a secure computer or on a removable hard drive that can be
secured. Laboratory records must be retained by the contract laboratory for a minimum of five years.
Project records must be retained by the lead organization conducting the monitoring operations for a
minimum of five years, preferably longer. Site location and retention period for the stored data will be
specified in Section A9, Documents and Records, Table 8.
Field Data Collection, Processing, and Delivery Standards to Water Resources Program Lead
In general, the process for preparing and submitting field data includes the following steps:
1. Create field forms and mobile device entry screens and review with R2 Resources (contact:
Dana Stewart or Judy Simon) 2 weeks before field trip.
2. In the field, record data on field forms or in mobile devices and do QC1 and QC2.
3. Backup field forms and books and mobile devices (ArcPad, Trimble, cameras, GPS,
thermistors, etc.) nightly.
4. Submit these raw deliverables to AEA at least monthly, via AEA SharePoint or to AEA IT on
external drives/DVDs with large files. AEA considers these to be interim deliverables.
5. Process the raw data to prepare for the AEA project database: convert raw file to a submittal
format, perform remaining QC levels 1 to 3, assign site IDs, flag unusable records, apply
database naming and codes, perform data reduction, etc.
6. Submit final processed (QC3) data files to AEA SharePoint or via hard drive, as done for raw
data. (Refer to the GIS User Guide for delivery of GIS data.)
7. For data being delivered for storage in the project database, data must be accompanied by a
data dictionary.
8. The project’s data resource manager will perform QC4 review and coordinate revisions with
the consultant’s Data Coordinator.
9. Data and dictionary are incorporated into the Susitna project relational database. No more
revisions can be made in the data by consultants, as the data is considered Final for the study
year.
10. If data revisions are needed later, such as for QC5, they’ll be coordinated by the project’s data
manager. The appropriate QC columns will be updated, which will serve as adequate
documentation.
Quality Control Protocol
• There will be 5 levels of data QC, named QC1 to QC5, each of which is tracked either within
t abular datasets (as for Excel and database tables), or within file path names (as for raw field
data files).
• This allows for quick determination of the QC status of all data.
• Details for the QC Protocol are found in Appendix A: Data QC Protocol.
• The QC levels, briefly, are as follows:
QC1 – Field Review: Review of field forms before leaving the field, or the QC level of raw
dat a collected via field equipment such as thermistors, cameras, GPS units, etc.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 87 March 2013
QC2 – Data Entry: Data from paper forms are entered into an electronic format and verified.
QC3 – Senior Review: Final review by senior professional before submitting field data to
AEA, or the QC level of raw data cleaned up for delivery to AEA.
QC4 – Database Validation: Tabulated data files are verified to meet project database
standards.
QC5 – Technical Review: Data revision or qualification by senior professionals when
analyzing data for reports.
There will be 5 levels of data QC, named QC1 to QC5, each of which is tracked within the data. This
allows for quick determination of the QC status of every data record. The first three levels are to be
completed by the study team, the fourth level by the Program Lead team, and the final level by senior
professionals during analysis and reporting.
QC1 – Field Review: QC review performed by the person collecting field data, whether recorded on
paper field forms or directly into electronic data collection tools, and then by the field team
leader. This is also the QC level of raw data collected via field equipment such as
thermistors, cameras, GPS units, etc.
The goal of QC1 is to identify errors and omissions and correct them under similar field
conditions prior to leaving the field.
Review is done on 100% of data and includes completeness, legibility, codes, and logic on all
information recorded. This is typically completed in the field daily. Once completed, QC1
notations are made directly on the field form in an entry named “QC1”, containing the date
and responsible staff and formatted as “YYYYMMDD FLastname” (example: “20120631
JDoe”).
QC2 – Data Entry: Data from paper forms are entered into an electronic format, then data entry is
verified by a second party against the field forms.
The goal of QC2 is to verify correct, complete, and consistent data entry.
Verification is done on 100% of data entered and includes extrapolation of shorthand codes
that might be used in the field into longhand or standard codes during data entry. Data entry
errors are corrected at this time, then QC is recorded in a column named “QC2”, containing
the date and responsible staff and formatted as “YYYYMMDD FLastname” (example:
“20120631 JDoe”).
QC3 – Senior Review: Data are reviewed by a senior professional on the consultant team, checking
for logic, soundness, and adding qualifiers to results if warranted. Calculated results can also
be added at this time (formulas must be documented in the data dictionary). This is the final
review before submitting field data to the Program Lead, and is recorded in the “QC3” column
in the same format as QC2. This is also the QC level of raw files that have been “cleaned up”
or otherwise processed for delivery to AEA, such as photos.
QC4 – Database Validation: Electronic data files are submitted to and verified by the Program
Lead’s data resources manager. The deadline for this delivery is negotiated with the team
Data Coordinator in consideration of the study due date.
Data are verified for completeness, project standards (codes, field name conventions, date
formats, units, etc.), calculated and derived fields, QC fields, etc. The data files are
incorporated into the project database schema, splitting into normalized tables as necessary
and all primary and foreign keys checked. An error report is generated for the study
consultant, who is expected to make corrections and resubmit data. The process is repeated
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 88 March 2013
until verification is clean and records are marked in column “QC4” (such as “20121001
DStewart”).
QC5 – Technical Review: Data revision and qualification may be applied by senior professionals
when analyzing data for reports, trends, and FERC applications. Data calculations may be
stored with the data. Some data items may get corrected or qualified within the database,
while others are only addressed in report text. QC5 may be iterative, as data are analyzed in
multiple years.
If a data item is revised directly, it’s recorded in 2 columns, QC5 (date and staff) and QC5Edit (what is
revised and why). This will serve as adequate documentation of the revisions, so maintenance of
additional documentation isn’t usually necessary. QC5 revisions will be physically made by the Data
Resource Manager, directed by the senior professional.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 89 March 2013
C. ASSESSMENTS
C.1 ASSESSMENTS AND RESPONSE ACTIONS
The QA program under which this task order will operate includes technical system audits, with
independent checks of the data obtained from sampling, analysis, and data-gathering activities. URS
Quality Assurance Officer (QAO) and the Tt Quality Control Lead (QCO) will review the data
packages to ensure similar levels of QA and QC are attained. The essential steps in the QA program
are as follows:
• Identify and define the problem
• Assign responsibility for investigating the problem
• Investigate and determine the cause of the problem
• Assign and accept responsibility for implementing appropriate corrective action
• Establish the effectiveness of and implement the corrective action
• Verify that the corrective action has eliminated the problem
Many of the technical problems that might occur can be solved on the spot by the staff members
involved; for example, by modifying the technical approach, repairing instrumentation that is not
working properly, or correcting errors or deficiencies in documentation. Immediate corrective actions
form part of normal operating procedures and are noted in records for the project. Problems not solved
this way require more formalized, long-term corrective action. If quality problems that require
attention are identified, Tt or the subcontractor will determine whether attaining acceptable quality
requires short- or long-term actions. If a failure in an analytical system occurs (e.g., performance
requirements are not met), the appropriate QC Officer or laboratory QA Manager will be responsible
for corrective action and will immediately inform the Tt PM or QAO, as appropriate. Subsequent steps
taken will depend on the nature and significance of the problem.
The URS Quality Assurance Officer and the Tt QC Lead have primary responsibility for monitoring
the activities of this project and identifying or confirming any quality problems. These problems will
also be brought to the attention of the Tt QC Lead, who will initiate the corrective action system
described above, document the nature of the problem, and ensure that the recommended corrective
action is carried out. The URS QA Lead has the authority to stop work on the project if problems
affecting data quality require extensive effort to resolve and are identified.
The AEA PM and Tt Water Quality Technical Lead will be notified of major corrective actions and
stop work orders.
Corrective actions might include the following:
• Re-emphasizing to staff the project objectives, the limitations in scope, the need to adhere to
the agreed-upon schedule and procedures, and the need to document QC and QA activities
• Securing additional commitment of staff time to devote to the project
• Retaining outside consultants to review problems in specialized technical areas
• Changing procedures
• The Tt Technical Lead may replace a staff member or subcontractor, as appropriate, if it is in
the best interest of the project to do so.
• The URS QAO and Tt QC Lead are responsible for overseeing work as it is performed and
periodically conducting checks during the data entry and analysis phases of the project. As data
entries, calculations, or other activities are checked, the person performing the check will sign
and date a hard copy of the material or complete a review form, as appropriate, and provide this
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 90 March 2013
documentation to the Tt Technical Lead for inclusion in the project files. Field audits and
technical system audits will not be conducted under this task order.
C.1.1 High Quality End-Use Tier 2 Monitoring Data
Generally, this project will require high end-use quality data results for comparison to Alaska’s water
quality standards and will need more frequent and varied assessments to provide a more thorough and
independent validation that the monitoring project does capture high end-use quality data. This
monitoring project collects samples for subsequent laboratory analysis and will need more types of
assessments than just project field measurements to independently evaluate the overall monitoring
system. Example QA Assessments include the following:
Field Assessments (each parameter)
• Precision (replicate) sample measurements. Project will have a minimum of three paired
measurements/project or 10% of project samples, whichever is greater. Replicate
measurements will be evenly spaced over project timeline. Precision criteria are specified in the
project’s Measurement Quality Objectives (MQO) table, see section A7.
Field samples collected for subsequent laboratory analysis (each parameter)
• Blind replicate samples for each parameter will be measured. The project will have a minimum
o f three paired measurements/project or 10% of project samples, whichever is greater.
Replicate samples will be evenly spaced over the life of the project. Precision criteria are
specified in project’s MQO table, see section A.7.
• Sample splits (one split will be sent to laboratory analyzing project samples, the other split will
be sent to a reference lab). This will be determined based on the laboratory SOP.
• Matrix spike duplicates (MSD) (assesses total measurement bias for project – both precision
and accuracy). Frequency of MSDs is usually specified by the analytical method. Accuracy
and precision of criteria for each pollutant and analytical method are specified in the project’s
MQO table, see section A.7.
• Third party performance evaluation samples (PE samples also called performance test (PT)
samples) for wastewater analytes of interest. PT water/wastewater sample participation is at a
frequency of 1/year from a NELAC certified vendor (http://www.nelac-
institute.org/PT.php#pab1_4). For APDES permit monitoring, these are called DMRQA
samples.
• Microbiological samples will be analyzed by the current ADEC Division of Environmental
Health Drinking Water certified lab (http://www.dec.state.ak.us/eh/lab/certmicrolabs.aspx) for
the methods of interest. Laboratory third party microbiological PT samples results will be
submitted directly to the DEC Water QA Officer and the Monitoring Project’s QA Officer.
Note 1: It is the laboratory’s responsibility to enroll itself in these blind PT studies with the results
mailed/emailed directly to the ADEC DOW Water QA Officer and the Monitoring Project’s
QA Officer. Routine laboratory performance in the blind PT sample studies will be used to
assess overall laboratory data quality, as well as monitoring project data quality.
Note 2: It is the responsibility of the Project Manager and project QA Officer to ensure the selected
laboratory is annually self-enrolled in a NELAC certified PT water/wastewater study for those
analytes required in the monitoring project.
On-Site Assessments include the following:
• Inspection of field monitoring operations for compliance with QAPP requirements.
• Laboratory Audit (if concerns arise regarding laboratory data quality)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 91 March 2013
• Audit of project field measurement data results.
Project Data Assessments include the following elements:
• Audits of Monitoring Data for reproducibility of results from recalculation/reconstruction of
field/lab unprocessed data.
• Calculation of monitoring project’s overall achieved precision, accuracy and data completeness
compared to QAPP defined precision, accuracy and data completeness goals.
Table 19: Project Assessments
Assessment Type Measurement Parameters Frequency Acceptance
Criteria Limits Analyte Method
On-site Field
Audit/Inspection
All water
samples
collected for
each set of
analytes
As per Section
A.7
1/site/monitoring
season
Site technicians
in compliance
with QAPP
sampling
protocols, sample
sites meet sample
design criteria
Field Split Sample (sent
to different labs for
comparison analysis)
Prescribed for
parameters based
on laboratory
SOP
As per Section
A.7
1/monitoring
season
Per Laboratory
Protocol
On-site Technical
System Lab audit
Indicated by
inability to meet
individual
performance
criteria for an
analyte
As per Section
A.7
If concerns arise
regarding
laboratory data
quality
Per Laboratory
Protocol
Independent Data
Review Audit All data As per Section
A.7
10% of reported
data
˃90%
Completeness
Project Precision,
Accuracy and Data
Completeness
Assessment
All parameters
analyzed in the
laboratory
As per Section
A.7
end of project
and at least
1/year
Defined in
Section A.7 and
Table 6
C.2 REVISIONS TO QAPP
Annually the QAPP will be reviewed and revised as needed by the URS Project Manager, Tt Water
Quality Lead, and reviewed by the URS project QA officer. Minor revisions may be made without
formal comment. Such minor revisions may include changes to identified project staff (but not lead
project staff: QA project officer, project manager, field technical lead, contracted laboratories), QAPP
distribution list and/or minor editorial changes.
Revisions to the QAPP that affect stated monitoring Data Quality Objectives, Measurement Quality
Objectives, method specific data validation “critical” criteria and/or inclusion of new monitoring
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 92 March 2013
methods must seek review and pre-approval by DEC DOW QA Officer/DEC Project Management
before being implemented.
Revision to the QAPP will be reported in a separate document as an amendment to the original QAPP.
The independent amendment will be linked to the original QAPP document by citation and dated to
reflect methods that supersede the original approach.
C.3 QA REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT
A draft data report will be prepared and forwarded to the AEA for data analysis completed during
winter 2013. The report will include the following:
• Description of the project purpose, goals, and objectives.
• Map(s) of the study area and sampling sites.
• Descriptions of field methods.
• Discussion of data quality and the significance of any problems encountered in the analyses.
• Summary tables of field data.
• Observations regarding significant or potentially significant findings.
• Recommendations based on project goals.
Table 20: QA Reports to Management
QA Report Type
Contents
Presentation
Method
Report
Issued by
Reporting Frequency
As Required Year
On-site Field Inspection
Audit Report
Description of audit results, audit methods
and standards/equipment used and any
recommendations
Written text and tables,
charts, graphs
displaying results
Project QA
Officer/auditor
Field Split Sample
Report
Evaluation/comparison of result of split
sample results from different laboratories,
audit method
Written text and tables,
charts, graphs
displaying results
Project QA
Officer/auditor
On-site Laboratory
Audit Report
Description of audit results, audit methods
and standards/equipment used and any
recommendations
Written text and tables,
charts, graphs
displaying results
Project QA
Officer/auditor
3rd Party PT (DMRQA,
etc.) Audit Report
Description of audit results, methods of
analysis and any recommendations
Written text and
charts, graphs
displaying results
Project QA
Officer/auditor
Corrective Action
Recommendation
Description of problem(s), recommended
corrective action(s), time frame for
feedback on resolution of problem(s)
Written text/table QA
Officer/auditor
Response to Corrective
Action Report
Description of problem(s),
description/date corrective action(s)
implemented and/or scheduled to be
implemented
Written text/table Project Manager
overseeing
sampling and
analysis
Data Quality Audit Independent review and recalculation of
sample collection/analysis (including
calculations, etc) to determine sample
result. Summary of data audit results;
findings; and any recommendations
Written text and
charts, graphs
displaying results
Project QA
Officer
Quality Assurance
Report to Management
Project executive summary: data
completeness, precision, bias/accuracy
Written text and
charts, graphs
displaying results
Project QA
Officer
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 93 March 2013
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 94 March 2013
D. DATA VALIDATION AND USABILITY
D.1 DATA REVIEW, VERIFICATIONAND VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS
The purpose of this section is to define the criteria used to review and validate monitoring data
generated from field sampling at locations on the Susitna River and tributaries. Criteria adopted for
validation will be used to accept, reject or qualify data in an objective and consistent manner. Data
review, verification and validation are a way to decide the degree to which each data item has met its
quality specifications (i.e. analyte specific QC criteria and overall project measurement quality
objectives).
D.1.1 Data validation
Data validation means determining if data satisfy QAPP-defined user requirements, that is, that the
data refer back to the overall data quality objectives. Data validation is an analyte and sample-specific
process that extends the evaluation of data beyond method, procedural, or contractual compliance (i.e.,
data verification) to determine the analytical quality of a specific data set to ensure that the reported
data values meet the quality goals of the environmental data operations (analyte and method specific
data validation criteria).
D.1.2 Data Verification and Data Review
Data verification is the process of evaluating the completeness, correctness, and
conformance/compliance of a specific data set against the method, procedural, or contractual
requirements. Data review is the process that evaluates the overall data package to ensure procedures
were followed and that reported data is reasonable and consistent with associated QA/QC results.
Data validation and review services provide a method for determining the usability and limitations of
data and provide a standardized data quality assessment. All Field Data forms will be reviewed by the
Tt Technical Lead and Field Task Manager (assisted by the QAO, as needed) for completeness and
correctness. Tt will be responsible for reviewing data entries and transmissions for completeness and
adherence to QA requirements. Data quality will be assessed by comparing entered data to original
data or by comparing results to the measurement performance criteria summarized in Section 4.0 to
determine whether to accept, reject, or qualify the data. Results of the review and validation processes
will be reported to the Technical Leads.
D.2 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION METHODS
D.2.1 Validation Methods
Data validation determines whether the data sets meet the project-specific requirements as described in
the QAPP. That is, were the data results of the right type, quality, and quantity to support their
intended use. Data validation also attempts to give reasons for sampling and analysis anomalies, and
the effect that these anomalies have on the overall value of the data.
All data generated shall be validated in accordance with the QA/QC requirements specified in the
methods and the technical specifications outlined in this QAPP. Raw sample data will be maintained
by the agency or company responsible for the monitoring project. Raw laboratory data shall be
maintained by the laboratory. The laboratory may archive the analytical data into their laboratory data
management system. All data will be kept a minimum of 10 years by contractors to AEA and AEA
will retain all records permanently..
The summary of all laboratory analytical results will be reported to the project manager. Data
validation will be performed by the laboratory for all analyses prior to the release of data. All
laboratory data will be validated according to the laboratory’s QAP and SOPs and, as specified in the
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 95 March 2013
Monitoring Project’s QAPP. The rationale for any anomalies in the QA/QC of the laboratory data will
be provided to the URS/Tt Project Managers with the data results. Completed COC or transmission
forms (if required) will be sent back from the laboratory to the Project Managers. Each batch of data
sent from the laboratory will undergo a second review by the URS QA Officer (with assistance from
the Tt QC Lead) to determine if DQOs are met. This secondary check ensures and independent review
of laboratory results by project staff. The DQO review is completed using performance metrics
described in Section B.5 Quality Control Requirements.
Data will be qualified as necessary. Sampling may need to be repeated. Unacceptable data (i.e., data
that do not meet the QA measurement criteria of precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability
and completeness) will not be used or if used, the problems with the data will be clearly defined,
flagged appropriately and data use clearly delimited and justified. Any actions taken to correct QA/QC
problems in sampling, sample handling, and analysis must be noted. Under the direction of the
URS/Tt Project Managers, project staff will document any QA/QC problems and the respective
QA/QC corrective actions taken.
Direct evaluation of MQOs are based on the following elements for both field and laboratory data:
• Detectability;
• Precision;
• Bias/Accuracy;
• Completeness;
• Representativeness; and
• Comparability.
Laboratory analysis performance and field results will be compared against MQOs listed in Table 10.
Calculation of MQO results for the above performance criteria are found in Section A.7.2. The
laboratory will calculate and report the RPD and percent analyte recovery of analytical duplicate
samples and MS/MSD samples (for evaluation of DQOs described next).
DQOs are evaluated based on both qualitative and quantitative performance measures the include the
following:
• Preservation and holding times for analysis of samples (Table 16);
• Field quality control requirements (Table 17); and
• Field/Laboratory quality control samples (Table 18).
Performance measurements for each of the analytes and laboratory control samples must either fall
within a specified range reported in these tables or meet/exceed the stated threshold.
The URS/Tt Project Managers/Field Team Lead or his/her designee is responsible for reviewing field
log notebooks and field data sheets for accuracy and completeness within 48 hours of each sample
collection activity, if possible. The Project Manager or his/her designee will compare the sample
information in the field log notebooks and/or data field sheets with the laboratory analytical results to
ensure that no transcription errors have occurred and to verify project QA/QC criteria have been met
(e.g., relative percent difference (RPD) results for blind sample duplicates, percent analyte recovery
results for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) results (Table 18).
Sample results provided by the laboratory will be verified and validated by the laboratory QA Officer
prior to issuing the laboratory report. Laboratory results will include the results of all QA/QC results
as part of the sample data report. The laboratory report will become part of the permanent file for the
monitoring project. The URS Project QA Officer or his/her designee will calculate the RPD between
field replicate samples.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 96 March 2013
Analyte specific precision, accuracy and data completeness results greater than project MQO’s will be
noted by the Project Manager and justified in the final data report. The Project Manager, along with
supervisors and/or the Project QA Officer, if necessary, will decide if any QA/QC corrective action is
necessary if the precision, accuracy (bias) and data completeness values exceed the project’s MQO
goals.
The Tt Water Quality Technical Lead or designee will review all Field Data Record forms. The Tt QC
Lead will review a minimum of 5 percent of the Field Data Record forms and other records. Any
discrepancies in the records will be reconciled with the appropriate associated field personnel and will
be reported to the Tt Water Quality Technical Leads The AEA PM will be consulted with deficiencies,
observations, and findings, as well as with corrective action and technical directive recommendations
for consideration and approval.
Data verification requires confirmation by examination or provision of objective evidence that the
requirements of these specified QC acceptance criteria are met. Each step of the data collection and
analysis process must be evaluated and its conformance to the protocols established in this QAPP
verified, including:
• Sampling design
• Sample collection procedures
• Data analysis procedures
• Quality control
• Data format reduction and processing data
Validation involves detailed examination of the complete data package using professional judgment to
determine whether the established procedures were followed. Validation will be done by the URS
Quality Assurance Officer with assistance from the Tt Quality Control Lead when requested by the
URS QAO (Figure 1).
Tetra Tech and URS managers for the project will review all results to verify that methods and
protocols specified in this QAPP were followed; that all instrument calibrations, quality control
checks, and intermediate calculations were performed appropriately; and that the final reported data are
consistent, correct, and complete, with no omissions or errors.
Evaluation criteria will include the acceptability of instrument calibrations and precision data and the
appropriateness of assigned data qualifiers, if any. The URS QA Officer will review data packages
and companion field notations (with assistance from the Tt QC Lead) to determine if the results met
the MQOs for bias, precision, and accuracy for that sampling interval (monthly) and to ensure that all
analyses specified on the "Chain of Custody" form were performed (Section B.5). Based on
assessments of performance measures (Section A.7.2), the data will either be accepted, accepted with
appropriate qualifications, or rejected.
After the field data have been reviewed and verified by the project manager, they will be independently
reviewed by the URS QA Officer and Tt QC Lead for errors before closing out the study. The initial
data review will consist of a 10 percent random sampling of the project data. If any errors are
discovered during the initial data review, a full independent review will be undertaken by the URS QA
QA officer with assistance from the Tt QC Lead.
D.2.2 Verification Methods
The primary goal of verification is to document that applicable method, procedural and contractual
requirements were met in field sampling and laboratory analysis. Verification checks to see if the data
is complete, if sampling and analysis matched QAPP requirements, and if Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) were followed.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 97 March 2013
Verification of data is the responsibility of the Project QA Officer. The Project QA Officer should
verify at least 10% of generated project data in addition to all sample data anomalies and sample
results approaching or exceeding AWQS and permit limits.
The following procedures will be used to determine if data meets the measurement and data quality
objectives and criteria specified in Section A.7. If data QA/QC procedures do not meet the specified
criteria, the URS Quality Assurance Officer and Tt Quality Control Lead will review all field and
laboratory records to determine the cause. If equipment failures are limiting the usability of the data,
calibration and maintenance procedures will be reviewed and changed as needed. If sampling or
analytical procedures are the source of failures, methods will be reviewed to resolve the errors. Any
changes or modifications to quality control procedures will be approved by the Project Manager prior
to inclusion in the QA Project Plan.
Review of Sample Handling
Proper sample handling techniques are required to ensure sample integrity. During data review, the
sample handling procedures identified below are evaluated to determine potential effects on data
quality.
• Review of field sample collection and preservation procedures to determine whether they were
completed in accordance with the requirements specified by the analytical methods.
• Review of chain-of-custody documentation to ensure control and custody of the samples was
maintained.
• Review of sample holding times between sample collection, extraction, and analysis (see
Section B.2.1).
• Review of sample conditions upon receipt at the contract laboratory.
• Review of Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Samples. Specific procedures for
review of QA/QC samples are included in the sections below.
Laboratory Blank Samples
Laboratory blank samples (method and instrument blanks) are laboratory-prepared, analyte-free
samples used to detect the introduction of contamination or other artifacts into the laboratory sample
handling and analytical process. These blanks play an especially important role in sampling programs
involving trace-level analyses or analytes that are common solvents found in a laboratory. None of the
analytes of concern for this project are common laboratory contaminants.
Laboratory Control Samples
Laboratory control samples are used to assess analytical performance under a given set of standard
conditions. Synthetic samples, containing some or all of the analytes of interest at known
concentrations, are prepared independently from calibration standards. The samples consist of
laboratory control samples (LCS) and laboratory control sample duplicates (LCSD). Laboratory
control samples will be analyzed with each analytical batch. LCS may be used to estimate analytical
accuracy and precision by comparing measured results to actual concentrations. LCS/LCSD percent
recoveries will be checked on laboratory reports to ensure they are within the limits set by the EPA
methods listed in Section A.7.
LCS are also duplicated in the laboratory and then analyzed in an identical manner by the laboratory to
assess the laboratory’s internal precision. The analytical precision is expressed by the relative percent
difference (RPD) (see Section A.7.2). Analytical precision and accuracy should meet the method
criteria listed in A.7.
Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicates
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 98 March 2013
Matrix spike samples are actual field samples to which known amounts of select compounds (one, or
more, of the analytes of interest) are added. Both spiked and un-spiked aliquots (sample portions) are
analyzed. The difference between the concentration of the spike compound(s) in the spiked and un-
spiked aliquots is compared to the amount of spike added before the extraction process. Since actual
samples are used for the recovery determination, the matrix effects can be evaluated. Usually
expressed as a percentage of the mass of the spiked amount, spike recovery is the measurement of
accuracy anticipated for the sample matrix. Percent recoveries will be compared to EPA method
specific recoveries listed in Section A.7.
Matrix spike samples are also duplicated in the laboratory and then analyzed in an identical manner by
the laboratory to assess sample reproducibility and the laboratory’s internal precision. The analytical
precision is expressed by the RPD between the measurement results of the two duplicate samples.
Analytical precision and accuracy should meet the criteria provided in Section B.5.2. MS/MSD
samples will be run on each batch of samples.
Field Duplicate Samples
Field duplicate samples will be collected simultaneously with a primary project sample. Duplicates are
treated in the same manner as the primary sample during all phases of sample collection, handling, and
analysis. Duplicate sample results are used to assess precision, including variability associated with
both the laboratory analysis and the sample collection process (i.e., QC purposes). At least one
duplicate field sample (1/20/method/sampling location) will be collected and submitted blind to the
laboratory for this program.
Analytical results will be reviewed for agreement with each other or their respective reporting limits
and evaluated for comparability. Estimated results quantified below the reporting limit and qualified
with a “J” flag are not considered significant for the purpose of data agreement. The comparison
between project and field duplicate sample results should meet RSD (relative standard deviation)
criteria for each method listed in Section A.7.
Reporting Limits
The reporting limits are the lowest concentration that can be reliably achieved within specified limits
of precision and accuracy during routine laboratory conditions. For many analytes, the reporting limit
analyte concentration is selected by the laboratory as the lowest non-zero standard in the calibration
curve. Sample reporting limits vary based on sample matrix and dilution of the samples during
analysis. Reporting limits should be equal to or below the PQLs (Practical Quantitation Limits)
provided in Section A.7 for each method.
Data Qualification
Qualifiers will be applied to QC samples when acceptance criteria are not met and corrective action is
not performed or is unsuccessful. These same qualifiers will be applied to the associated sample data,
as defined in Table 21.
Table 21: Data Qualifiers
Qualifier Description
J The analyte was positively identified, the quantitation is estimated.
U The analyte was analyzed for, but not detected. The associated numerical value is at or
below the method detection limit (MDL).
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 99 March 2013
F The analyte was positively identified but the associated numerical value is below the
reporting limit (RL).
R The data are unusable due to deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet
QC criteria.
B The analyte was found in an associated blank, as well as in the sample.
M A matrix effect was present.
H Analysis was performed outside of the recommended holding time.
Completeness
Completeness is calculated after the QC data have been evaluated, and the qualifiers have been applied
to the sample data. Invalid results, broken or spilled samples, and samples that are unable to be
analyzed for other reasons are included in the assessment of completeness. The criteria and calculation
to determine completeness are provided in Section 5. If data cannot be qualified to meet completeness
goals, Tetra Tech will consult with the Project Manager to determine if additional sampling should be
performed to accomplish data quality objectives.
D.3 RECONCILIATION WITH USER REQUIREMENTS
The Project Manager and the Project QA Officer will review and validate data against the Project’s
defined MQOs (Section A.7.2) prior to the final reporting phase. If there are any problems with
quality sampling and analysis, these issues will be addressed immediately and methods will be
modified to ensure that data quality objectives are being met. Modifications to monitoring that affect
the quality of reported data will require notification to and updates to ADEC as well as subsequent
edits to the approved QAPP.
As soon as possible following completion of the sample collection and analyses, the Tt QC Lead will
assess the precision, accuracy, and completeness measures and compare them with the criteria
discussed in Section A.4. This will be the final determination of whether the data collected are of the
correct type, quantity, and quality to support their intended use for this project. Any problems
encountered in meeting the performance criteria (or uncertainties and limitations in the use of the data)
will be discussed with the project QA personnel and the Alaska Energy Authority PM, and will be
reconciled if possible.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 100 March 2013
REFERENCES
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2008. Alaska Water Quality Criteria Manual for
Toxic and Other Deleterious Organic and Inorganic Substances. Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation: Division of Water. Juneau, Alaska. 51p.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2005. Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring
Program. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation: Division of Water. Juneau, Alaska. 58p.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2012a. 18 AAC 70-Water Quality Standards,
Amended April 8, 2012.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2012b. 18 AAC 75-Oil and Other Hazardous
Substances Pollution Control, Amended April 8, 2012.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2012c. 18 AAC 80-Drinking Water Standards,
Amended August 20, 2012.
Alaska Energy Authority (AEA). 2011. Pre-Application Document: Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project
FERC Project No. 14241. December 2011. Prepared for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by
the Alaska Energy Authority, Anchorage, Alaska.
Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEIDC). 1983a. Examination of Susitna River Discharge
and Temperature Changes Due to the Proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project – Final Report. Prepared
by Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center Anchorage, AK. Submitted to Harza-Ebasco
Susitna Joint Venture Anchorage, AK. Prepared for the Alaska Power Authority, Anchorage, AK.
AEIDC. 1983b. Stream Flow and Temperature Modeling in the Susitna Basin, Alaska. Prepared by Arctic
Environmental Information and Data Center Anchorage, AK. Submitted to Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint
Venture Anchorage, AK. Prepared for the Alaska Power Authority, Anchorage, AK.
AEIDC. 1984a. Effects of Project-Related Changes in Temperature, Turbidity and Stream Discharge on Upper
Susitna Salmon Resources During June – Sept. January 1984. University of Alaska – Anchorage,
Anchorage, Alaska. APA Document Number 454.
AEIDC. 1984b. Examination of Susitna River Discharge and Temperature Changes Due to the Proposed Susitna
Hydroelectric Project. February 1984. University of Alaska – Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska. APA
Document Number 861.
AEIDC. 1984c. Assessment of the Effects of the Proposed SHP on Instream Temperature and Fishery Resources
in the Watana to Talkeetna Reach Vol. 1 Main Text – Final. October 1984. University of Alaska –
Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska. APA Document Number 2330.
AEIDC. 1984d. Assessment of the Effects of the Proposed SHP on Instream Temperature and Fishery
Resources in the Watana to Talkeetna Reach Vol. 2 Appendices A-H– Final. October 1984. University of
Alaska – Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska. APA Document Number 2331.
AEIDC. 1985. Assessment of the Effects of the Proposed SHP on Instream Temperature and Fish Resources in
the Watana to Talkeetna Reach. May 22, 1985. University of Alaska – Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska.
APA Document Number 2706.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 101 March 2013
Banks, W.S.L., Paylor, R.L., and Hughes, W.B., 1996, Using thermal-infrared imagery to delineate ground-
water discharge: Ground Water, v. 34, no. 3, p. 434–443.
Cole, T.M. and S. A. Wells. 2000. CE-QUAL-W2: A two-dimensional, laterally averaged, Hydrodynamic and
Water Quality Model, Version 3.0, Instruction Report EL-2000. US Army Engineering and Research
Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
EPA (U.S Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA
QA/G-5). Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-98/018. Washington, D.C. 136p.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for
use in Fish Advisories: Volume 1 Fish Sampling and Analysis, 3rd Edition. EPA-823-B-00-007. United
States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Washington, D.C. 485p.
EPA (U.S Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans
(EPA QA/R-5, EPA/240/B-01/003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Quality Assurance
Division, Washington, DC.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. EPA Contract Laboratory Program, National Functional
Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, OSWER 9240.1-35, EPA 540-R-01-008. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Washington, DC.
EPA (U.S Environmental Protection Agency). 2005. Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project
Plans: Evaluating, Assessing, and Documenting Environmental Data Collection and Use Programs. EPA-
505-B-04-900A, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Defense, and Department of
Energy, Washington, D.C.
Fischer, W.A., Davis, D.A., and Sousa, T.M., 1966, Fresh-water springs of Hawaii from infrared images: U.S.
Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas 218, 1 map.
Hamrick, J.M. 1992. A Three-Dimensional Environmental Fluid Dynamics Computer Code: Theoretical and
Computational Aspects, Special Report 317. The College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of
Marine Science. 63 pp.
Imberger, J., and Patterson, J. C. (1981). A dynamic reservoir simulation model- DYRESM. In Transport
Models for Inland and Coastal Waters (H. B. Fischer ed.), pp. 310-361. Academic Press, New York.
LaBaugh, James W., and Rosenberry, Donald O. 2008. Field Techniques for Estimating Water Fluxes between
Surface Water and Ground Water. Techniques and Methods Chapter 4–D2, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S.
Department of the Interior.
Patterson, John, J. Imberger, B. Hebbert, and I. Loh. 1977. Users Guide to DYRESM – A Simulation Model for
Reservoirs of Medium Size. University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia.
Pluhowski, E.J., 1972, Hydrologic interpretations based on infrared imagery of Long Island, New York,
Contributions to the hydrology of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2009–B,
20 p.
Robinove, C.J., 1965, Infrared photography and imagery in water resources research: Journal of the American
Water Works Association, v. 57, pt. 2, p. 834–840.
Robinove, C.J., and Anderson, D.G., 1969, Some guidelines for remote sensing in hydrology: Water Resources
Bulletin, v. 5, no. 2, p. 10–19.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 102 March 2013
Rundquist, D., Murray, G., and Queen, L., 1985, Airborne thermal mapping of a “flow-through” lake in the
Nebraska Sandhills: Water Resources Research, v. 21, no. 6, p. 989–994.
Taylor, J.I., and Stingelin, R.W., 1969, Infrared imaging for water resources studies: Journal of the Hydraulics
Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, v. 95, no. 1, p. 175–189.
Theurer, F.D., K.A. Voos, and W.J. Miller. 1984. Instream Water Temperature Model. Instream Flow Inf. Pap.
16. U.S. Fish and Wildlife. Serv. FWS/OBS-84/15. v.p.
URS. 2011. AEA Susitna Water Quality and Sediment Transport Data Gap Analysis Report. Prepared by Tetra
Tech, URS, and Arctic Hydrologic Consultants. Anchorage, Alaska. 62p.+Appendixes.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 103 March 2013
APPENDIX A
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 104 March 2013
APPENDIX A: LOCATION MAPS
Figure A-1. Map of site Susitna above Alexander Creek at RM 15.1
Figure A-2. Map of site Susitna Station at RM 25.8
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 105 March 2013
Figure A-3. Map of site Yentna River at RM 28
Figure A-4. Map of site Susitna above Yentna at RM 29.5
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 106 March 2013
Figure A-5. Map of site Deshka River at RM 40.6
Figure A-6. Map of site Susitna at RM 55
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 107 March 2013
Figure A-7. Map of site Susitna at Parks Highway East at RM 83.3
Figure A-8. Map of site Susitna at Parks highway West at RM 83.9
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 108 March 2013
Figure A-9. Map of site Talkeetna at RM 97.2
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 109 March 2013
Figure A-10. Map of site Talkeetna at RM 103
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 110 March 2013
Figure A-11. Map of site Talkeetna at RM 103.3
Figure A-12. Map of site LRX 18 at RM 113
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 111 March 2013
Figure A-13. Map of site Curry Fishwheel Camp at RM 120.7
Figure A-14. Map of Site Slough 8A at RM 126
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 112 March 2013
Figure A-15. Map of site LRX 29 at RM 126.1
Figure A-16. Map of site Slough 9 at RM 129.2
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 113 March 2013
Figure A-17. Map of site LRX 35 at RM 130.8
Figure A-18. Map of site Susitna near Gold Creek at RM 136.5
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 114 March 2013
Figure A-19. Map of site Gold Creek at RM 136.8
Figure A-20. Map of site Slough 16B at RM 138
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 115 March 2013
Figure A-21. Map of site Indian River at RM 138.6
Figure A-22. Map of site Susitna above Indian River at RM 138.7
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 116 March 2013
Figure A-23. Map of site Slough 19 at RM 140
Figure A-24. Map of site LRX 53 at RM 140.1
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 117 March 2013
Figure A-25. Map of site Slough 21 at RM 142
Figure A-26. Map of site Susitna below Portage Creek at RM 148
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 118 March 2013
Figure A-27. Map of site Susitna above Portage Creek at RM 148.8
Figure A-28. Map of site Portage Creek at RM 148.8
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 119 March 2013
Figure A-29. Map of site Susitna at RM 165
Figure A-30. Map of site Susitna at Watana Dam at RM 184.5
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 120 March 2013
Figure A-31. Map of site Watana Creek at RM 194.1
Figure A-32. Map of site Kosina Creek at RM 206.8
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 121 March 2013
Figure A-33. Map of site Susitna near Cantwell at RM 223.7
Figure A-34. Map of site Oshetna River at RM 233.4
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 122 March 2013
APPENDIX B
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 123 March 2013
APPENDIX B: FIELD FORMS
Susitna River Baseline Sediment Monitoring
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________
Site ID __________________________________ Sample Time_______________
FIELD MESUREMENTS
Sample Pt #1 GPS Coordinates _______________________________________
Water Depth (m) ___________ Turbidity _____________
Temperature (°C) ___________
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) __________
pH (units) ____________
Conductivity (µS/cm) __________
Redox Potential (mV) __________
Sample Pt #2 GPS Coordinates _______________________________________
Water Depth (m) ___________ Turbidity _____________
Temperature (°C) ___________
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) __________
pH (units) ____________
Conductivity (µS/cm) __________
Redox Potential (mV) __________
Sample Pt #3 GPS Coordinates _______________________________________
Water Depth (m) ___________ Turbidity _____________
Temperature (°C) ___________
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) __________
pH (units) ____________
Conductivity (µS/cm) __________
Redox Potential (mV) __________
GRAB SAMPLES
Sample Pt #1 Sample Pt #2 Sample Pt #3
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: TOC, Sediment Grain Size
Metals (Total): Aluminum, Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Mercury, Zinc
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
______________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 124 March 2013
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 March 2013
Susitna River Baseline WQ Monitoring Circle Event Type Below
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Monthly
Site ID __________________________________ Sample Time_______________ Monthly + Single
Event
FIELD MESUREMENTS
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB GPS Coordinates _______________________________________
Water Depth (m) _________ Turbidity (NTUs) __________ Color __________
Residues (single event) _______________
Depth (m)
[every 0.5 m until
0.5 m off bottom]
Temp (°C) DO (mg/L) pH (units) Conductivity
(µS/cm)
Redox
Potential
(mV)
0
0.5
Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB GPS Coordinates _______________________________________
Water Depth (m) _________ Turbidity (NTUs) __________ Color __________
Residues (single event) _______________
Depth (m)
[every 0.5 m until
0.5 m off bottom]
Temp (°C) DO (mg/L) pH (units) Conductivity
(µS/cm)
Redox
Potential
(mV)
0
0.5
Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB GPS Coordinates _______________________________________
Water Depth (m) _________ Turbidity (NTUs) __________ Color __________
Residues (single event) _______________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 126 March 2013
Depth (m)
[every 0.5 m until
0.5 m off bottom]
Temp (°C) DO (mg/L) pH (units) Conductivity
(µS/cm)
Redox
Potential
(mV)
0
0.5
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 March 2013
Susitna River Baseline WQ Monitoring
GRAB SAMPLES
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
MONTHLY EVENT PARAMETERS
General WQ: Hardness, Alkalkinity, Nitrate+Nitrite, Ammonia as N, TKN, TP,
Ortho-P, Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC
Metals (Total & Dissolved): Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium, Cobalt, Copper,
Iron, Lead, Manganese, Magnesium, Mercury, Molybdenum, Nickel, Thallium,
Vanadium, Zinc
MONTHLY EVENT + SINGLE EVENT PARAMETERS (additional parameters in bold)
General WQ: Hardness, Alkalkinity, Nitrate+Nitrite, Ammonia as N, TKN, TP,
Ortho-P, Chl a, TDS, TSS, Turbidity, DOC, TOC, Fecal Coliform, PAHs,
Radioactivity
Metals (Total & Dissolved): Aluminum, Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium,
Chromium (III & IV), Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Magnesium, Mercury,
Molybdenum, Nickel, Selenium, Thallium, Vanadium, Zinc
WEATHER AND SITE OBSERVATIONS
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #1 – Below Dam
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #1 – Below Dam
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #1 – Below Dam
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & 2 side channels)
Parameters
Sample Pt
#1
25% LB
Sample Pt
#2
50% LB
Sample Pt
#3
75% LB
GW Sample
#1
LB
GW Sample
#2
RB
Sample Pt #4
South Side
Channel
Sample Pt #5
North Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity:
(µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – South Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #5 – North Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #1 – Below Dam
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (main channel & 2 side channels)
Parameters
Sample Pt
#1
25% LB
Sample Pt
#2
50% LB
Sample Pt
#3
75% LB
GW Sample
#1
LB
GW Sample
#2
RB
Sample Pt #4
South Side
Channel
Sample Pt #5
North Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity:
(µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – South Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #5 – North Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #1 – Below Dam
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #5 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #1 – Below Dam
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #2 – MR2 Wide
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #2 – MR2 Wide
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
North Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – North Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #2 – MR2 Wide
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
North Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – North Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #2 – MR2 Wide
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #2 – MR2 Wide
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #3 – MR2 Narrow
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #3 – MR2 Narrow
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
North Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – North Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #3 – MR2 Narrow
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
North Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – North Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #3 – MR2 Narrow
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #3 – MR2 Narrow
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #4 – Portage Creek
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #4 – Portage Creek
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #4 – Portage Creek
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #4 – Portage Creek
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #4 – Portage Creek
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #4 – Portage Creek
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #4 – Portage Creek
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #4 – Portage Creek
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (Furthest Upstream, main channel & Portage Creek)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
Portage Creek
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – Portage Creek
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #4 – Portage Creek
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #5 – Slough 21
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
SE Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – SE Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #5 – Slough 21
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
SE Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – SE Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #5 – Slough 21
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
SE Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – SE Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #5 – Slough 21
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #5 – Slough 21
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #6 – Indian River
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #6 – Indian River
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
NW Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – NW Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #6 – Indian River
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
NW Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – NW Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #6 – Indian River
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #6 – Indian River
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #7 – Slough 11
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #7 – Slough 11
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
East Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – East Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #7 – Slough 11
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
NE Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – NE Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #7 – Slough 11
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #7 – Slough 11
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #8 – Slough 8
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #8 – Slough 8
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel & 3 side channels)
Parameters
Sample Pt
#1
25% LB
Sample Pt
#2
50% LB
Sample Pt
#3
75% LB
GW
Sample #1
LB
GW
Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt
#4 Small
East Side
Channel
Sample Pt
#5 SE Side
Channel --
RB
Sample Pt
#6 SE Side
Channel --
LB
GPS:
Water Depth:
(m)
(Surf, Mid,
Bottom)
Temperature:
(°C)
(Surf, Mid,
Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid,
Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid,
Bottom)
Conductivity:
(µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid,
Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – Small East Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #8 – Slough 8
Sample Pt #5 – SE Side Channel – RB Sample Pt #5 – SE Side Channel -- LB
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #8 – Slough 8
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #8 – Slough 8
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & 2 side channels)
Parameters
Sample Pt
#1
25% LB
Sample Pt
#2
50% LB
Sample Pt
#3
75% LB
GW Sample
#1
LB
GW Sample
#2
RB
Sample Pt #4
Small East
Side
Channel
Sample Pt #5
SE Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity:
(µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – Small East Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #5 – SE Side Channel
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #8 – Slough 8
SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #8 – Slough 8
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #8 – Slough 8
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #9 – Slough 6A
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
*Collect samples within Focus Area starting at the furthest downstream transect working upstream*
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #9 – Slough 6A
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
West Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – Westt Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #9 – Slough 6A
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
West Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – West Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #9 – Slough 6A
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #9 – Slough 6A
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #10 – Whiskers Slough
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #1 (Furthest Downstream, main channel & 2 side channels)
Parameters
Sample Pt
#1
25% LB
Sample Pt
#2
50% LB
Sample Pt
#3
75% LB
GW Sample
#1
LB
GW Sample
#2
RB
Sample Pt #4
West Side
Channel
Sample Pt #5
East Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity:
(µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #1 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – West Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #5 – East Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #10 – Whiskers Slough
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #2 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
West Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #2 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – West Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #10 – Whiskers Slough
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #3 (main channel & side channel)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
Sample Pt #4
West Side
Channel
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #3 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank Sample Pt #4 – West Side Channel
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOTOGRAPHS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
Susitna River Monitoring Focus Area #10 – Whiskers Slough
Site Name________________________________ Date_____________________ Sample Time_______________
TRANSECT #4 (Furthest Upstream, main channel only)
Parameters Sample Pt #1
25% LB
Sample Pt #2
50% LB
Sample Pt #3
75% LB
GW Sample #1
LB
GW Sample #2
RB
GPS:
Water Depth: (m)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Temperature: (°C)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
DO: (mg/L)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
pH: (units)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
Conductivity: (µS/cm)
(Surf, Mid, Bottom)
TRANSECT #4 – GRAB SAMPLES
*If water depth at sample point is > than 5 ft (1.5 m) then collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface and 0.5 m above
bottom. If water depth is < than 5ft (1.5 m) just collect a grab sample at 0.5 m below surface.*
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m DEPTH: 0.5 m
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
Sample Pt #1 – 25% from LB Sample Pt #2 – 50% from LB Sample Pt #3 – 75% from LB
DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom) DEPTH: _______ (0.5 m off bottom)
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
GW Sample #1 – Left Bank GW Sample #2 – Right Bank
SAMPLE ID ______________ SAMPLE ID ______________
SAMPLE TIME ____________ SAMPLE TIME ____________
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BASELINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
FOCUS AREA #10 – Whiskers Slough
GRAB SAMPLE PARAMETERS
General WQ: Turbidity, Hardness, Nitrate+Nitrite, TN, TP, Ortho-P
Metals: Mercury (Total), Methyl-mercury (Dissolved), Aluminum (total & dissolved), Iron (total
& dissolved)
WEATHER & SITE OBSERVATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________