HomeMy WebLinkAboutSuWa41Alaska Resources Library & Information Services
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document
ARLIS Uniform Cover Page
Title:
Surveys of eagles and other raptors : 2012 technical memorandum
SuWa 41
Author(s) – Personal:
Prepared by John E. Shook, Joseph H. Welch, and Robert J. Ritchie
Author(s) – Corporate:
ABR, Inc.--Environmental Research & Services
AEA-identified category, if specified:
2012 Environmental Studies
AEA-identified series, if specified:
Series (ARLIS-assigned report number):
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project document number 41
Existing numbers on document:
Published by:
[Anchorage, Alaska : Alaska Energy Authority, 2013]
Date published:
February 2013
Published for:
Prepared for Alaska Energy Authority
Date or date range of report:
Volume and/or Part numbers:
Final or Draft status, as indicated:
Document type:
Pagination:
vi, 33, [15] p.
Related work(s):
Pages added/changed by ARLIS:
Notes:
All reports in the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document series include an ARLIS-
produced cover page and an ARLIS-assigned number for uniformity and citability. All reports
are posted online at http://www.arlis.org/resources/susitna-watana/
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project
(FERC No. 14241)
Surveys of Eagles and Other Raptors
2012 Technical Memorandum
Prepared for
Alaska Energy Authority
Prepared by
John E. Shook, Joseph H. Welch, and Robert J. Ritchie
ABR, Inc.–Environmental Research & Services
February 2013
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page ii February 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary .........................................................................................................................................v
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1
2. Study Objectives.................................................................................................................1
3. Study Area ..........................................................................................................................2
4. Methods ...............................................................................................................................2
4.1. Deviations from Study Plan .....................................................................................2
4.2. Territory Occupancy and Productivity .....................................................................3
4.3. Nest Sightability Assessment ...................................................................................4
4.4. Fall and Winter Surveys of Bald Eagles ..................................................................4
4.5. Delineation of Eagle Nesting Habitat ......................................................................5
5. Results .................................................................................................................................5
5.1. Territory Occupancy and Success ............................................................................6
5.1.1. Golden Eagle ............................................................................................... 6
5.1.2. Bald Eagle ................................................................................................... 7
5.1.3. Other Raptors .............................................................................................. 8
5.2. Nest Sightability Assessment ...................................................................................9
5.3. Fall and Winter Surveys of Bald Eagles ..................................................................9
5.4. Delineation of Eagle Nesting Habitat ....................................................................10
6. Discussion..........................................................................................................................10
7. References .........................................................................................................................12
8. Tables ................................................................................................................................14
9. Figures ...............................................................................................................................21
10. Appendices ........................................................................................................................33
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Mean monthly air temperature and cumulative precipitation for two weather
reporting stations near the Project area, April−July 2012 ..................................................... 15
Table 2. Number and condition of Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nests from surveys
during the breeding season, fall, and early winter in the 2012 raptor study area ................. 16
Table 3. Raptor nests located at elevations below 2,050 feet (predicted maximum
pool) in the reservoir section of the 2012 raptor study area ................................................ 17
Table 4. Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nest success and territory occupancy in the
2012 raptor study area ........................................................................................................... 18
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page iii February 2013
Table 5. Nest success and territory occupancy for other species of raptors in the
2012 raptor study area. .......................................................................................................... 19
Table 6. Number and condition of Red-tailed Hawk, Common Raven, and unidentified
raptor nests in the 2012 raptor study area ............................................................................. 20
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Raptor study area in 2012 for the proposed Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project. .... 22
Figure 2. Distribution and occupancy of Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nests in the 2012
raptor study area. ................................................................................................................... 23
Figure 3. Nest occupancy and distribution of nesting habitat of Bald Eagles and Golden
Eagles in the reservoir section of the 2012 raptor study area. .............................................. 24
Figure 4. Nest occupancy and distribution of nesting habitat of Bald Eagles and Golden
Eagles in the Chulitna and Gold Creek corridor sections of the 2012 raptor study area. ..... 25
Figure 5. Nest occupancy and distribution of nesting habitats of Bald Eagles and Golden
Eagles in the Denali corridor section of the 2012 raptor study area. .................................... 26
Figure 6. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the 2012 raptor study
area. ....................................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 7. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the Denali corridor section of
the 2012 raptor study area. .................................................................................................... 28
Figure 8. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the Chulitna and Gold Creek
corridor sections of the 2012 raptor study area. .................................................................... 29
Figure 9. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the reservoir section of the
2012 raptor study area. .......................................................................................................... 30
Figure 10. Distribution of topographic slope values at Golden Eagle nest sites in the 2012
raptor stud y area. ................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 11. Distribution of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values at
Golden Eagle nest sites found in the 2012 raptor study area. ............................................... 32
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Species, nest ID, and occupancy status of all raptor nests found in the 2012 raptor
study area.
Appendix 2. Number and condition of raptor nests found outside of the 2012 raptor study area on
surveys during the breeding season, fall, and early winter.
Appendix 3. Occupancy and success of raptor nests and territories found outside of the 2012
raptor study area.
Appendix 4. Summaries of Bald Eagle surveys conducted during fall and early winter in 2012.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page iv February 2013
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND SCIENTIFIC LABELS
Abbreviation Definition
ADF&G Alaska Department of Fish and Game
AEA Alaska Energy Authority
APA Alaska Power Authority
APA Project APA Susitna Hydroelectric Project
BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
DEM digital elevation model
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GIS geographical information system
GPS Global Positioning System
h hour(s)
ILP Integrated Licensing Process
km kilometer
km2 square kilometers
LGL LGL Alaska Research Associates, Inc.
m meter
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
mi2 square miles
NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NPS National Park Service
NWF National Wildlife Federation
PAD Pre-Application Document
Project Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project
RM river mile
SD standard deviation
TCPF The Canadian Peregrine Foundation
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
mean
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page v February 2013
SUMMARY
The purposes of this study were to compile existing information on nest sites and habitat use of
Bald Eagles, Golden Eagles, and other raptors; delineate survey areas; conduct occupancy and
productivity surveys; and conduct surveys of Bald Eagles in fall and early winter. Additional
objectives were to provide current information that can be used to identify critical data gaps;
inform the development of the 2013–2014 study plan in consultation with AEA, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and other licensing participants; and provide data for use in
identifying potential Project-related impacts on eagles and other raptors.
Major accomplishments included occupancy surveys in May and productivity surveys in July,
which were conducted by helicopter within 2 miles of the Project area boundaries (as defined in
April 2012) in four sections of the study area (Chulitna, Gold Creek, and Denali corridors and
the reservoir inundation zone; Figure 1), covering over 1,165 square miles of terrain in 18 days
of surveys. A pilot effort was conducted to evaluate the sightability of raptor nests and additional
plots are planned in the 2013–2014 study to provide a sample large enough to create correction
factors. Surveys of potential Bald Eagle concentration areas were performed in fall and early
winter to assess the density and distribution of Bald Eagles in the Project area. Finally, nesting
habitat was delineated for both species of eagles using a combination of field and desktop
mapping techniques. In 2013–2014, observers will continue to delineate cliff habitats for Golden
Eagles during field surveys. Nesting habitat for Bald Eagles will be quantified more accurately
later, after the planned wildlife habitat map becomes available in 2014 (see Sections 10.14.4.3
and 10.14.7 in AEA 2012).
In 2012, 99 Golden Eagle nests were located among 25 occupied and 3 additional possibly
occupied territories (Figure 2); only 6 of the nesting pairs were successful (1 or more young).
Forty-one Bald Eagle nests were located among 17 occupied territories and one additional
possibly occupied territory; eight of the nesting pairs were successful. Results for other species
included 7 occupied Peregrine Falcon territories (1 successful pair, with 3 young); 4 occupied
Gyrfalcon territories (none successful); 1 occupied Red-tailed Hawk territory (successful, with 1
young); and 24 Common Raven nests were located among 6 occupied territories (success
unknown) (Figure 3).
During four Bald Eagle fall and winter concentration surveys conducted between early October
and mid-December 2012, 21 Bald Eagles were located on the first survey, 5 on the second
survey, 5 on the third survey, and none on the fourth survey. Except for one found on the
Oshetna River, all of the Bald Eagles were found on Indian Creek (26%), Portage Creek (16%),
the mainstem Susitna River downstream from Portage Creek (16%), and the Stephan Lake
outlet/Prairie Creek vicinity (39%).
During the field surveys, 251 cliff areas potentially suitable for Golden Eagle nesting were
identified in the study area (29% classified as high quality, 41% moderate quality, 27% low
quality, 3% unclassified). Bald Eagle habitat occurs primarily along the Susitna River and its
tributaries. Remote-sensing analysis was used to identify potential Golden Eagle nesting habitat
based on slope, elevation, and vegetation. Ninety-four percent (94%) of the Golden Eagle nests
found in the raptor study area in 2012 occurred in areas identified by the latter method.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page vi February 2013
The data collected in 2012 will help provide information needed for FERC’s National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis for the Project license application. Information on
nesting and habitat use by Bald Eagles, Golden Eagles, and other raptor species is required to
comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
(MBTA), and Executive Order 13186 (Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory
Birds). Construction and operation of the Project, as described in the Pre-Application Document
(PAD), will affect potential raptor nesting and foraging habitats through clearing of trees and
inundation of forested habitats and some cliffs used for nesting. Project construction and
operation will increase human activity in the Project area, which may disturb nesting eagles and
other raptors.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 1 February 2013
1. INTRODUCTION
The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) is preparing a License Application that will be submitted to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric
Project (Project) using the Integrated Licensing Process (ILP). The Project is located on the
Susitna River, an approximately 300-mile-long river in Southcentral Alaska. The Project’s dam
site would be located at river mile (RM) 184.
This study provided data to inform the 2013–2014 licensing study program, Exhibit E of the
License Application, and FERC’s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis for the
Project license.
Information on nesting and habitat use by the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Golden
Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), and other raptor species is required to comply with the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and Executive
Order 13186, Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds. Construction and
operation of the Project, as described in the Pre-Application Document (AEA 2011), will affect
potential raptor nesting and foraging habitats through clearing of trees and inundation of forested
habitats and some cliffs possibly used for nesting. Construction and operation will increase
human activity in the Project area, which could disturb nesting eagles and other raptors.
Information from aerial surveys conducted in the 1980s for the original Susitna Hydroelectric
Project proposed by the Alaska Power Authority (APA; the 1980s project is referred to as the
APA Project) provided the first assessment of the distribution and abundance of raptors nesting
in and near a proposed reservoir impoundment area (Low Watana), which was similar to the
current Project proposal. Those surveys focused on the Bald Eagle, Golden Eagle, Common
Raven (Corvus corax), and, to a lesser extent, other species of raptors (e.g., Gyrfalcon, Falco
rusticolus, and Northern Goshawk, Accipiter gentilis). Until 2012, however, comprehensive
surveys had not been conducted recently in the Project area to assess the current distribution and
nesting status of raptors. Historical surveys also did not include the entire Project footprint (all
portions of proposed access road and power transmission corridors), as currently proposed. In
addition, more advanced analytical techniques are now available that enable better assessments
of the potential effects of the Project on raptor habitats.
This technical memorandum presents the results of the analytical effort described in the 2012
Study Plan titles W S3: Eagle and Raptor Nest Study (AEA 2012a). The survey of Eagles and
Other Raptors is a multi-year study initated in 2012. The study effort will continue in 2013-2014
as RSP Section 10.14.
2. STUDY OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the 2012 study were to compile existing information on nest sites and habitat
use by eagles and other species of raptors, conduct occupancy and productivity surveys of all
species, conduct surveys of Bald Eagles during fall and early winter, and delineate nesting
habitats. The 2012 study was designed to provide current information that can be used to identify
remaining data gaps; inform the development of 2013–2014 study plans in consultation with
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 2 February 2013
AEA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and other licensing participants; and provide
data for use in identifying potential Project-related impacts on eagles and other raptors, for
eventual use during impact assessment, mitigation planning, and permitting for the Project.
3. STUDY AREA
The raptor study area was designed to include forested, riparian, and cliff habitats that potentially
could be affected by the Project. The 2012 raptor study area (Figure 1; totaling 1,165 square
miles [mi2] or 3,018 square kilometers [km2]) was subdivided for analysis into four sections
extending 2 miles (3.2 kilometers [km]) around three potential access road and power
transmission corridors (Chulitna Corridor section, 224 square miles or 581 square kilometers;
Gold Creek Corridor section, 306 square miles or 794 square kilometers; Denali Ccorridor
section, 313 square miles or 810 square kilometers) and within and near the reservoir inundation
zone (reservoir section, 322 square miles or 833 square kilometers, with the 2-mile buffer
applied around the 2,200-foot elevation contour). The composite of these sections corresponded
to the Project area description in the Proposed Study Plan that was filed with FERC on July 16,
2012. The 2-mile buffer surrounding the Project area boundary was developed through
consultation with USFWS in April 2012, before beginning the surveys. In addition, some
additional Bald Eagle territories are included in this report, having been detected outside of and
downstream from the raptor study area during refueling trips or while searching for historical
nest sites.
At the end of October 2012, after most of the 2012 surveys were completed, the Project area was
modified and the boundaries were revised for the Revised Study Plan filed with FERC. Hence,
the raptor study area used in 2012 was superseded. Future analyses will account for the
difference in study areas, which are minor. As is explained in Section 10.14 of the Revised Study
Plan (AEA 2012b), the study area will be expanded in 2013 and 2014 to evaluate the extent of
Golden Eagle nesting territories in relation to the reservoir inundation zone.
4. METHODS
4.1. Deviations from Study Plan
Surveys were performed as outlined in the 2012 Study Plan (AEA 2012a), with no major
deviations. A minor deviation occurred because the last Bald Eagle survey had to be delayed
approximately 1–2 weeks in December due to safety concerns caused by poor weather conditions
and limited helicopter availability. Raptor nesting habitats were delineated in 2012 but foraging
habitats were not, because a suitable wildlife habitat map was not yet available; that mapping
will be completed in 2013–2014. A pilot effort to develop a sightability correction factor for
detecting eagle nests was performed in 2012 but was not applied to 2012 data; the results of that
effort will be supplemented in 2013 and 2014 to produce a correction factor.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 3 February 2013
4.2. Territory Occupancy and Productivity
Survey methods followed aerial and ground-based protocols established for eagle nest surveys
(USFWS 2007; Pagel et al. 2010). Trained observers conducted aerial surveys from a small
piston-engine helicopter (Robinson R44) during four periods in 2012. Nest occupancy surveys
for early- and late-nesting raptors were conducted during May 7–14 and May 19–21,
respectively. Nest productivity surveys for early- and late-nesting raptors were conducted during
July 8–12 and July 25–26, respectively.
We searched for stick nests of large tree-nesting species—Bald Eagle, Northern Goshawk, Red-
tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus), Great Gray Owl (Strix
nebulosa), and Common Raven—along drainages at lower elevations. We searched for stick
nests of Golden Eagles, Gyrfalcons, Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus), and Common Ravens
on cliff substrates at all elevations. Historical locations of Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nests
identified during APA Project studies in the 1980s were revisited even if they were outside the
2012 raptor study area. Peregrine Falcons and Gyrfalcons often nest on dirt scrapes on cliff
ledges and in nests built by other raptors. Therefore, quantifying the occupancy of falcon
territories is difficult unless the nest is currently occupied. Unoccupied, previously used nest
ledges of Peregrine Falcons and Gyrfalcons were not recorded unless an adult currently occupied
a territory containing the cliff with the nest ledge. An exception was made for Gyrfalcon nests at
which thick layers of feces indicated numerous years of use (e.g., a fresh nest bowl being
maintained on top of >1.0 meter [m] [3.28 feet]) of feces was recorded in the study area).
Two observers seated on the same side of the helicopter participated in each survey. Standard
survey procedure included flying along the center of a drainage, then angling toward prospective
tree- or cliff-nesting habitats when the aircraft was within 0.5–1.0 miles (0.8–1.6 kilometers) of
these habitats. Slow (10–40 mi/h, 15–60 km/h) approaches and passes were made within 100–
300 feet (30–100 meters) from cliffs and trees to search for nests. Mountainsides and tall cliffs
were surveyed at multiple elevations to ensure complete coverage of all cliff faces. Multiple
passes or hovering flights were made to inspect nests only when incubating adults or young were
not detected. If young were present, age was estimated from body size and the stage of feather
development, through comparison with age-specific photos (Golden Eagle: Hoechlin 1976; Bald
Eagle: NWF 1977; Peregrine Falcon: TCPF 2012).
Geographical coordinates were obtained for each nest by using a Global Positioning System
(GPS) receiver to record a waypoint directly over the nest. For nests where birds were present,
we briefly hovered at least 500 feet (150 meters) above the nests to reduce disturbance. GPS
coordinates were entered into a geodatabase for analysis using a Geographical Information
System (GIS).
Nests were classified as occupied if territorial or incubating birds were present or the nests were
decorated with fresh vegetation or contained fresh feathers. Even if a site contained fresh-looking
sticks or vegetation, showed sign of some improvements, or an adult was seen near the nest,
occupancy status was recorded as unknown if the amount of evidence was insufficient to confirm
occupancy. Unoccupied nests showed no signs of use in the current breeding season. Nests that
were classified as occupied or unknown during occupancy surveys were revisited during
productivity surveys to evaluate the final status of the nests (e.g., successful, unsuccessful) and
the number and age of young.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 4 February 2013
Potential raptor territories were defined as occupied nests that were located more than 1
kilometer (0.6 mile) from the nearest occupied nest of the same species. An exception to this rule
was made if an occupied nest that was classified as belonging to an unidentified species of raptor
(e.g., a stick nest containing fresh green vegetation, but with no adults present) was located
within 1 kilometer of an occupied nest of a raptor species that builds similar-looking nests; in
such a case, the former nest was not considered to represent a separate, distinct territory. In this
first year of study, we applied a conservative estimate (1 kilometer) of the nearest-neighbor
distance between nests of each large raptor species to estimate potential territories. This distance
was based on the minimum distances of close nesting reported for three key species in western
North America: Peregrine Falcon (Yukon and Tanana River areas, Ritchie and Shook 2011; S.
Ambrose, personal communication); Golden Eagle (Idaho and Utah, Beecham and Kochert
1975; Smith and Murphy 1982); and Bald Eagle (Stalmaster 1987). Additional surveys in 2013
and 2014 in the study area under varying conditions of prey availability and weather conditions
will allow refinement of territory distribution and nearest-neighbor distances (see Section
10.14.4 in AEA 2012b).
Nest condition was classified as good, fair, poor, remnant, or unknown. Nests in good condition
could be used by a raptor with little or no repair, whereas nests in fair condition could be used
after moderate improvement (e.g., additional sticks required to create a flat platform). Nests in
poor condition would require major improvement to create a usable platform. Remnant nests had
only a few sticks remaining after substantial weathering and probably would require complete
reconstruction to be usable again. A few nests located during Bald Eagle surveys in fall and early
winter were classified as being of unknown condition because they were covered in snow.
4.3. Nest Sightability Assessment
In 2012, a pilot effort was conducted to assess the sightability of raptor nests, which will aid in
interpreting the 2012 results and planning the 2013–2014 surveys. Subsamples of the study area,
consisting of quadrats with a size of 2 minutes of latitude by 5 minutes of longitude, or
approximately 6.1 square miles (15.7 square kilometers), were searched intensively for
additional nests, following a method developed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game
(ADF&G) for moose surveys (Kellie and DeLong 2006). Five quadrats were resurveyed at the
end of the first occupancy survey, focusing on Golden Eagle habitat.
4.4. Fall and Winter Surveys of Bald Eagles
Trained observers conducted aerial surveys from a Robinson R44 helicopter to assess the
distribution and abundance of Bald Eagles in areas of open water in the raptor study area. As
winter progressed and water bodies froze, less of the study area was searched each time. Bald
Eagle surveys were flown on October 17 and 31, November 13, and December 14. Two
observers seated on opposite sides of the helicopter participated in each survey. Standard survey
procedure included flying 10–30 meters above the tallest treetops at approximately 50 mph along
the center of a stream or along the edge of unfrozen lakes, ponds, and river sloughs. Observers
recorded the number, age, and locations of all Bald Eagles, as well as the locations and counts of
salmon carcasses and waterfowl.
Emphasis was placed on locating congregations of Bald Eagles. Within the raptor study area, we
searched all streams without natural barriers to salmon (i.e., waterfalls) and all unfrozen lakes
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 5 February 2013
where waterfowl might congregate. We also surveyed the Susitna River between the raptor study
area and Talkeetna on the first two surveys, while traveling to Talkeetna for fuel.
4.5. Delineation of Eagle Nesting Habitat
Preliminary maps of nesting habitat for both species of eagles were generated using a
combination of field observations, aerial photography, and GIS analysis using a digital elevation
model (DEM) and data on vegetative biomass (indicated by the Normalized Difference
Vegetation Index, or NDVI). During nest occupancy and productivity surveys, observers made
notes on maps to delineate cliffs suitable for Golden Eagle nesting. An experienced raptor
biologist ranked suitable cliffs with a qualitative score from ‘A’ (highest value) to ‘C’ (lowest
value). A-ranked habitats were steep cliffs with multiple flat ledges and/or protective overhangs
and difficult access by mammalian predators. B-ranked habitats included moderately steep cliffs,
fewer flat ledges and/or protective overhangs than A-ranked cliffs, and moderate to difficult
access by mammalian predators. C-ranked habitats had crumbling slopes, talus, or small rock
outcrops, limited or no ledges and/or overhangs, with easy to moderate access by mammalian
predators. Additional mapping and a more thorough evaluation of cliff habitats will be completed
in 2013. Field-delineated notes on maps from 2012 were digitized using a GIS.
Remote-sensing data analysis was employed to map potential Golden Eagle cliff-nesting habitat.
DEM (slope and elevation) and NDVI raster data were available at a spatial resolution of 5-meter
pixels. Using a GIS, we extracted slope and NDVI values at the locations of all Golden Eagle
nests found during the 2012 surveys. To define the lower range of cliff habitats that were suitable
for nesting, we used the – 2 SD (mean – 2 standard deviations) of slope and NDVI values at
Golden Eagle nest locations. We used the maximum elevation (5,200 feet or 1,585 meters) at
which a Golden Eagle nest has been found near the Project area, from a 25-year dataset compiled
in Denali National Park and Preserve (C. McIntyre, National Park Service [NPS], personal
communication), as the upper limit of Golden Eagle nesting. Areas meeting all criteria for slope,
NDVI, and elevation were mapped at a spatial resolution of 5 m [16.4 feet] 5 m.
Bald Eagle nests were found near water throughout the forested portions of the raptor study area.
Using a GIS, we selected all lakes and non-perennial streams with adjacent large trees. To map
potential nesting habitat for Bald Eagles, we used a GIS to apply a buffer around these water
bodies by the maximum distance (134 meters [440 feet]) from water at which Bald Eagles were
found nesting in 2012. We also buffered the streams and lakes using a liberal estimate of the
maximum distance at which a Bald Eagle might nest from water (800 meters [2,625 feet]).
Because a suitable vegetation map was not available at the time this report was written,
identification of streams and lakes bordered by tall trees was limited to direct observation while
flying surveys and to review of aerial photography.
5. RESULTS
Survey conditions were fair to good, with good visibility and limited turbulence, for most of the
surveys in 2012, allowing complete coverage of the raptor study area during each survey period.
High winds, sun glare, snow, rain, and low cloud ceilings occurred during some surveys,
however, requiring adjustments for safety and efficiency. Two weather stations located near the
Project area (Cantwell 4E and Chulitna River) recorded temperatures during the 2012 field
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 6 February 2013
season that were near average, whereas precipitation was slightly below normal (Table 1). In
June (during the early nestling stage for many raptors), however, precipitation at the Chulitna
River station was more than double the 30-year mean, a factor that may have contributed to the
low nesting success observed for all raptor species in 2012, as is discussed in the next section.
5.1. Territory Occupancy and Success
5.1.1. Golden Eagle
Ninety-nine Golden Eagle nests were located in the 2012 raptor study area (Table 2, Figure 2,
Appendix 1). Two other Golden Eagle nests were occupied by falcons in 2012, so they were
excluded from density calculations for Golden Eagles. Golden Eagle nest density was lowest in
the reservoir section (0.023 nests/square kilometers; Figure 3), intermediate in the Gold Creek
and Denali corridor sections (0.034 and 0.036 nests/square kilometers, respectively; Figures 4
and 5), and highest in the Chulitna corridor section (0.041 nests/square kilometers; Figure 4).
Within the Chulitna Corridor section, 11 of 24 nests (46%) were found in the Portage Creek
drainage. Nests in the Gold Creek and Reservoir Corridor sections were located primarily along
the Susitna River and on many of the canyon’s tributaries. In the Denali Corridor section, all but
three nests were in the western half where the terrain is more mountainous.
Thirty-two Golden Eagle nests (32%) showed signs of occupancy during at least one survey in
2012, and another five nests (5%) were possibly occupied. These 37 nests represented 25
occupied and 3 possibly occupied territories in the 2012 raptor study area (Table 4). Only 6 of
the 25 occupied territories (24%) were successful, with at least 1 young that reached ≥75% of the
estimated fledging age. Incubating birds were observed at 13 (52%) of the occupied Golden
Eagle territories, producing a total of 8 young, for a mean brood size of 0.32 young/occupied
territory (1.3 young/successful territory; Table 4). Four other nests, representing two additional
territories, were found incidentally outside of the 2012 raptor study area (Appendices 2 and 3).
Golden Eagles also exhibited low productivity in 2012 in Denali National Park and Preserve,
producing 1.0 young/successful territory (C. McIntyre, NPS, personal communication).
Snowshoe hare numbers declined substantially in Denali National Park and Preserve between
2011 and 2012, and were thought to be at a similarly low level in the Project area, according to
ADF&G biologists commenting on furbearer study plans (M. Burch, ADF&G, personal
communication).
Golden Eagle nests were found on cliffs at elevations between 1,360 feet (415 meters) and 4,850
feet (1,478 meters) throughout the 2012 raptor study area; none were found in trees. Sixty-seven
Golden Eagle nests (68%) were in good or fair condition, 19 (19%) were in poor condition, and
13 (13%) were remnant nests (Table 2). Two Golden Eagle nests were found below the
maximum-pool elevation of the proposed reservoir (2,050 feet or 625 meters; Table 3); one of
those nests was occupied in 2012.
A number of characteristics of breeding raptors, especially Golden Eagles, complicate
assessment of the total number of territories that are present in a given area. First, territories may
not be occupied in a given year (Kochert et al. 2002). Weather, prey abundance, and winter
mortality of adults can influence the number of nesting adults each year. For example, during six
consecutive survey years in Denali National Park and Preserve, only 43 of 74 (58%) Golden
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 7 February 2013
Eagle territories were occupied every year (McIntyre 1995), demonstrating that occupancy of
territories is highly variable.
Due to the dynamic nature of territory occupancy, multiple years of surveys are required to
accurately identify the maximum number of Golden Eagle territories in a given area. Like many
other raptors, Golden Eagles normally construct alternate, or supernumerary, nests (Kochert et al.
2002). The number of alternate nests per territory has ranged from 1 to 14, but 2 or 3 nests are
more typical in a territory (Kochert et al. 2002). Alternate nests often occur in closely spaced
clusters, but also can be separated by several kilometers (>5 kilometer or >3 miles; McGahan
1968). Territorial eagles may improve more than one alternate nest in a breeding season, further
complicating an estimate of territorial pairs in an area (Kochert et al. 2002). Based on the number
and distribution of Golden Eagle nests found in the study area, annual variability in territory
occupancy, and a positive relationship between the number of nesting Golden Eagles and the
population level of snowshoe hares in Denali National Park and Preserve (C. McIntyre, NPS,
personal communication), more territories may be identified in the study area during the surveys
that will be conducted in 2013 and 2014 (see Section 10.14.4.1 in AEA 2012b).
5.1.2. Bald Eagle
Fifty-six Bald Eagle nests were documented during the 2012 surveys, including 41 nests in the
raptor study area and another 15 nests outside the study area. During the breeding season, 34
Bald Eagle nests were recorded in the raptor study area and 10 others outside of the study area
(Table 4, Figure 2, Appendix 3). During surveys after the breeding season (see Section 5.3
below), another seven nests were located in the raptor study area and five nests outside of the
study area (Table 2, Figure 2, Appendix 2).
Nests were most common along the Susitna River and its tributaries (Table 2, Figures 2–4); only
four nests were found in the Denali corridor section, all on Deadman Creek (Figure 5). Nest
densities were highest in the reservoir section (0.020 nests/square kilometer), moderate in the
Gold Creek and Chulitna corridor sections (0.014 and 0.015 nests/square kilometer,
respectively), and lowest in the Denali corridor section (0.005 nests/square kilometer). Most
(56%) of the nests in the Chulitna corridor section were located in the Portage Creek drainage.
Bald Eagle nests in the Gold Creek corridor section were located primarily along the Susitna
River or along Prairie Creek and Stephan Lake; five nests in the Gold Creek corridor section
were occupied in 2012. One to three nests were located along major tributaries of the Susitna
River in the reservoir section (Watana, Jay, and Kosina creeks and the Oshetna River).
Breeding-season surveys revealed that 19 (56%) Bald Eagle nests showed signs of occupancy
and the occupancy status of 2 nests (6%) was unknown (Table 4). These 21 nests represented 17
occupied nesting territories and one possibly occupied territory in the 2012 raptor study area.
Nests in 8 of the 17 occupied territories (47%) were successful, with at least one young that
reached ≥75% of fledging age. Incubating birds were found in 12 (71%) of the occupied
territories, producing 10 young for a mean brood size of 0.59 young/occupied territory (1.25
young/successful territory). Territory occupancy could not be evaluated for the seven nests inside
and the five nests outside of the raptor study area that were found during the surveys in fall and
early winter.
The majority (88%) of Bald Eagle nests found in the 2012 raptor study area were in good or fair
condition, none were in poor condition, three (7%) were remnant nests, and two (5%) were of
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 8 February 2013
unknown condition (Table 2). All Bald Eagle nests were located within 134 meters of water
bodies. Eight nests in the reservoir section were below the maximum-pool elevation of the
proposed reservoir (2,050 feet or 625 meters; Table 3).
Fifteen nests (representing six more territories) were identified opportunistically outside the 2012
raptor study area (Appendices 2 and 3). Three of those six territories were located downstream of
the study area on the Susitna River and were not revisited later in the summer. Two of the other
three occupied territories were successful and produced three nestlings.
5.1.3. Other Raptors
Seven territories occupied by Peregrine Falcons were identified in 2012, located primarily along
the Susitna River and its tributaries (Table 5, Figures 6–9). In the reservoir section, four of the
occupied territories were below the maximum-pool elevation of the proposed reservoir (Table 3).
Incubating Peregrine Falcons were found in four territories (57%, Table 5). Only one (14%) of
the occupied territories was successful, producing three young that reached ≥75% of fledging age
(0.43 young/occupied territory). In territories with incubating pairs, 25% were successful,
producing 0.75 nestlings/incubating pair or 3.0 young/successful territory. Another Peregrine
Falcon territory was located 3 kilometer outside of the raptor study area (Appendix 3); it was
successful and produced one nestling. One Peregrine Falcon pair used a nest originally built by
Golden Eagles.
Four Gyrfalcon territories were identified in 2012 (Table 5, Figures 6–8), three of which were
located in alpine or tundra habitats in the Denali corridor section. All the territories contained
incubating birds, but none were successful. One pair used a nest originally constructed by
Golden Eagles.
Only one Red-tailed Hawk territory was found in the study area in 2012 (Tables 5 and 6, Figure
8). The Red-tailed Hawk pair occupied a cliff nest located on a tributary of the Susitna River.
The pair produced a single fledgling. The nest appeared to have been originally built by Golden
Eagles; additional, smaller fresh sticks were added on top of the old structure. Red-tailed Hawks
normally nest in trees in forested areas (Preston and Beane 1993), so this nest may represent an
outlier. More comprehensive surveys of Red-tailed Hawks and other woodland tree-nesting
species were not conducted in 2012, but are planned for 2013 and 2014 (see Section 10.14.4.1 in
AEA 2012b).
Twenty-four Common Raven nests were identified in the study area (Tables 5 and 6, Figures 6–
9). Common Raven nests were located primarily on the Susitna River and its tributaries. In the
reservoir section, 13 nests (4 occupied) were below the maximum-pool elevation of the proposed
reservoir (2,050 feet or 625 meters; Table 3). Twenty-two (92%) Common Raven nests were in
good or fair condition and two (8%) were remnant nests (Table 6). Six of the nests (25%) were
occupied and the occupancy of another nest (4%) was classified as unknown, representing six
territories and one possible territory (Table 5). All occupied nests contained incubating birds.
Three nests, representing one additional territory, were located outside the study area
(Appendices 2 and 3). Because Common Ravens fledged before the productivity surveys began,
it was not possible to evaluate nest success or productivity for the species.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 9 February 2013
Two Merlin territories were identified in the 2012 raptor study area (Figures 6, 8, and 9;
Appendix 1), but were not included in the tabular summary (Table 5) because nests of this
species are difficult to locate and their occupancy is difficult to assess from an aircraft.
Two (11%) of the 19 unidentified raptor nests found in 2012 were occupied, 16 (84%) were
unoccupied, and the occupancy status of another nest (5%) was classified as unknown (Table 5).
Some unidentified raptor nests were considered occupied because, although the builder of the
nest structure was not clear, they were located on cliffs at which adult raptors showed territorial
behavior over an entire cliff face on which multiple nest structures (of multiple species) were
located. Because the raptors could not be associated definitively with the nest structure, the
species using the nest remained unidentified. Compared with nests having known species
associations, a higher proportion of unidentified raptor nests were in poor or remnant condition.
5.2. Nest Sightability Assessment
Approximately 5.75 hours were spent resurveying sightability quadrats, averaging 1.15
hour/block (range 0.5–1.75 hours). Two quadrats contained large amounts of complex cliff
habitat, two contained moderate amounts of cliff habitat, and one contained a small amount of
cliff habitat. Only half of one quadrat was resurveyed (0.5 hours) because the other half was
outside the raptor study area. In three of the quadrats, six additional Golden Eagle nest structures
were located that had not been detected during the primary survey, including an additional
territory with an incubating bird. No additional nests of other species were found. Of the nests
missed on the first survey, three were very difficult to see (two were remnants, one was behind a
small tree) and three nests (including the one with an incubating adult) were on a single cliff that
was missed during the first survey because of poor visibility (foggy, windy weather).
Sightability of nests depends on many factors, including species, nest size, location, survey
weather, light conditions, substrate, tree size and density, habitat type, observer experience, and
survey platform (Booms et al. 2010). Although eagles often construct large, conspicuous stick
nests, some less conspicuous nests or habitats may be missed during surveys, especially during
marginal weather conditions. The goal of sightability assessment is to develop a sightability
correction factor for the target species to adjust density estimates for missed nests. No
sightability correction factor could be developed or applied to the 2012 survey results because
the sample size of resurvey plots was small. More effort is planned for this analysis in 2013 and
2014 (see Section 10.14.4.1 in AEA 2012b).
5.3. Fall and Winter Surveys of Bald Eagles
Bald Eagle surveys were conducted on October 17 and 31, November 13, and December 14
(Appendix 4). Twenty-one Bald Eagles were located on the first survey, 5 on the second survey,
5 on the third survey, and none on the fourth survey. All Bald Eagles, except for one on the
Oshetna River, were found on Indian River (26%), Portage Creek (16%), the Susitna River
downstream from Portage Creek (16%), and the Stephan Lake/Prairie Creek complex (39%),
which is part of the Talkeetna River basin. Except for the Oshetna River, those bodies of water
all remained partially or completely free of ice into early winter, after other water bodies had
frozen over. They appeared to support spawning runs of salmon and waterfowl were present at
Prairie Creek (the outlet of Stephan Lake) at least into mid-December 2012. Salmon carcasses
were only obvious on the first survey at one location on the Susitna just south of Gold Creek, but
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 10 February 2013
high water levels and flooding in fall 2012 may have washed away other salmon carcasses. In
years when such flooding does not occur, salmon carcasses may be more common and allow
more Bald Eagles to remain in the study area longer in winter. Late-season spawning runs of
salmon elsewhere in Interior Alaska provide winter food sources that support winter
concentrations of Bald Eagles (e.g., Delta and Kantishna rivers; R. Ritchie, unpublished data).
During these late-season surveys, leaves were off the trees and accumulated snow in nests made
them more visible, aiding in locating seven additional Bald Eagle nests within the raptor study
area and five other nests outside the study area (Table 2, Figure 2, Appendix 2). The occupancy
status of those nests in the 2012 breeding season was unknown.
5.4. Delineation of Eagle Nesting Habitat
During survey flights in 2012, observers identified and delineated 251 cliff areas that were
judged to be suitable for Golden Eagle nesting (Figures 3 through 5). Seventy-two (29%) were
ranked as A-quality cliffs, 103 (41%) were B-quality, 69 (27%) were C-quality, and quality was
not recorded for 7 (3%) cliffs. Suitable cliff-nesting habitat was concentrated in mountains and
along steep riparian slopes, but small cliff outcrops were found throughout the study area. No
spatial patterns were evident in the distribution of cliffs of different quality.
Remote-sensing analyses successfully identified the areas of habitat in which 94% of Golden
Eagle nests were located in 2012. Golden Eagle nests occurred across a broad range of slopes
(= 42.3°, SD = 9°; Figure 10) and NDVI values = 0.05; SD = 0.21; Figure 11). By
incorporating the – 2 SD range of values of slope and NDVI, the habitat model identified
potential Golden Eagle nesting habitat, not just those habitats with the highest probability of
nesting. As higher quality aerial imagery, DEM data, and vegetation mapping become available
in 2013 and 2014, this habitat model will be refined (see Sections 10.14.4.3 and 10.14.7 in AEA
2012b).
Bald Eagle nesting habitat occurred primarily along the Susitna River and its tributaries (Figures
3 and 4). Most lakes with forested shorelines suitable for nesting were located near Stephan Lake
and the lower Fog Lakes. Only one Bald Eagle nest was found outside of the delineated habitat.
That nest was found in a very small, isolated patch of cottonwood trees in tundra habitat along
upper Deadman Creek (Figure 5).
6. DISCUSSION
In the study area, 99 Golden Eagle nests were located in 2012. Nests were found in the reservoir
area and each of the access corridors, including 32–37 nests showing signs of occupancy,
representing 25–28 occupied territories. Only 6 of 13 nests that had incubating birds were
successful. The low productivity recorded in the study area in 2012 was similar to results from
nearby Denali National Park and may have been caused by low numbers of snowshoe hares or
poor weather during the early nesting stage. Two Golden Eagle nests (one of which was
occupied) were located below the maximum-pool elevation of the proposed reservoir (2,050
feet). Because the breeding biology of Golden Eagles is dynamic and the environmental
conditions that influence nesting may vary annually, the number of nests and territories is likely
to vary substantially on an annual basis.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 11 February 2013
Bald Eagle nests were located in the reservoir section and in each of the corridor sections; 34
nests were found during the breeding season and 12 nests were found during surve ys in fall and
early winter. Of the nests found during the breeding season, 19–21 nests were occupied,
representing 17–18 occupied territories. Of the 12 nests that had incubating birds, eight were
successful. Fifteen other nests were found outside the 2012 raptor study area. Eight Bald Eagle
nests were found below the maximum-pool elevation of the proposed reservoir.
Survey results also included seven occupied Peregrine Falcon territories; four occupied
Gyrfalcon territories; one occupied Red-tailed Hawk territory; and six occupied Common Raven
territories (24 Common Raven nests). Nesting Peregrine Falcons were not recorded in surveys
conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, a period of low population numbers (White 1974; LGL 1984).
Hence, the presence of this species in 2012 may represent an expansion of the range or recovery
of the breeding population, similar to what has been seen elsewhere in Interior Alaska (Ritchie
and Shook 2011). Other than Bald Eagles, few nests of tree-nesting species (Northern Goshawk,
Red-tailed Hawk, Great Horned Owl, Great Gray Owl) were found in 2012, possibly because the
surveys were focused on potential Bald Eagle nesting habitat near water bodies. More
comprehensive sampling of forested habitats away from water bodies is planned in 2013 and
2014, which may locate additional tree nests. Four of the occupied Peregrine Falcon territories
and four of the occupied Common Raven territories (containing 13 nests) were located below the
maximum-pool elevation of the proposed reservoir.
A pilot effort to evaluate the sightability of Golden Eagle nests revealed a few additional nests on
the resurvey plots, indicating that a sightability correction factor will be a valuable tool to obtain
more accurate estimates of nest density. Additional resurvey plots are planned in the 2013–2014
surveys to provide a sample large enough to derive correction factors.
Large numbers or concentrations of Bald Eagles were not recorded during the four surveys
conducted between early October and mid-December 2012. The largest number of Bald Eagles
(21) was recorded on the first survey, five eagles were recorded on the middle two surveys, and
none were found on the last survey. The only concentration of eagles beyond singles or pairs was
a group of nine at the Stephan Lake and Prairie Creek a fish-bearing tributary within the
Talkeetna River basin on the first survey. Only one Bald Eagle was observed in the proposed
reservoir area among the four late-season surveys. No indication of late-spawning salmon runs or
associated major concentrations of Bald Eagles was recorded in 2012. High water levels and
flooding in fall 2012 may have removed many salmon carcasses, however. Other locations in
Interior Alaska that have late-spawning runs of salmon host winter concentrations of Bald
Eagles.
The nesting habitat models, developed using a combination of field and GIS delineation
methods, indicate that a substantial amount of Bald and Golden Eagle nesting habitat is available
in the study area. During the field surveys, 251 cliff areas that were judged to be suitable for
Golden Eagle nesting were identified in the study area, primarily above tree line. Bald Eagle
habitat occurs primarily along the forested margins of the Susitna River and its tributaries.
Additional field delineation in 2013–2014, combined with the wildlife habitat map to be
produced in 2013–2014, will allow further refinement of our models of potential nesting habitat
(see Sections 10.14.4.3 and 10.14.7 in AEA 2012b).
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12 February 2013
7. REFERENCES
AEA (Alaska Energy Authority). 2011. Pre-Application Document: Susitna–Watana
Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 14241. December 2011. Prepared for the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
AEA. 2012a. 2012 Study Plan. W S3: Eagle and Raptor Next Study.
AEA. 2012b. Surveys of Eagles and Other Raptors. Revised Study Plan: Susitna-Watana
Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 14241, Section 10.14. December 2012.
Prepared for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by the Alaska Energy
Authority, Anchorage, Alaska. http://www.susitna-watanahydro.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/12/06-RSP-Dec2012_6of8-Sec-10.14-10.20-Wildlife2ndPart-
v2.pdf.
Beecham, J. J., and M. N. Kochert. 1975. Breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern
Idaho. Wilson Bulletin 87: 506–513.
Booms, T. L., P. F. Schempf, B. J. McCaffery, M. S. Lindberg, and M. R. Fuller. 2010.
Detection probability of cliff-nesting raptors during helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft
surveys in western Alaska. Journal of Raptor Research 44: 175–187.
Hoechlin, D. R. 1976. Development of Golden Eaglets in southern California. Western Birds 7:
137–152.
Kellie, K. A., and R. A. DeLong. 2006. Geospatial survey operations manual. Alaska
Department of Fish and Game, Fairbanks.
Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, C. L. McIntyre, and E. H. Craig. 2002. Golden Eagle (Aquila
chrysaetos). No. 684. In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America. The
Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 44 pp.
LGL (LGL Alaska Research Associates, Inc.). 1984. Susitna Hydroelectric Project, update and
refinement of bald and golden eagle impact assessments and mitigation plans. FERC
Project No. 7114. Prepared for the Alaska Power Authority, Anchorage. 66 pp.
McGahan, J. 1968. Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
McIntyre, C. L. 1995. Nesting ecology of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali
National Park, Alaska. M.S. thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. 57 pp.
NWF (National Wildlife Federation). 1977. Approximate ages of nestling bald eagles. Raptor
Information Center. National Wildlife Federation. (Photographs). 1 pp.
Pagel, J. E., D. M. Whittington, and G. T. Allen. 2010. Interim Golden Eagle technical guidance:
inventory and monitoring protocols; and other recommendations in support of eagle
management and permit issuance. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory
Bird Management. 30 pp.
Preston, C. R., and R. D. Beane. 1993. Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). No. 52. In A. Poole
and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc.,
Philadelphia, PA. 23 pp.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 13 February 2013
Ritchie, R. J., and J. E. Shook. 2011. Recovery and trends of Peregrine Falcons breeding in the
Yukon–Tanana uplands, east-central Alaska, 1995–2003. Journal of Raptor Research 45:
150–159.
Smith, D. G., and J. R. Murphy. 1982. Nest-site selection in raptor communities of the eastern
Great Basin. Great Basin Naturalist 42: 395–404.
Stalmaster, M. V. 1987. The Bald Eagle. Universe Books, New York, NY.
TCPF (The Canadian Peregrine Foundation). 2012. Peregrine Falcon development age guide.
Accessed April 1, 2012. URL: www.peregrine-foundation.ca/info/ageguide.html.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2007. National Bald Eagle management guidelines.
Washington, D.C. 25 pp.
White, C. M. 1974. Survey of the Peregrine Falcon and other raptors in the proposed Susitna
River reservoir impoundment areas. Prepared for Brigham Young University, Provo,
Utah and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. 3 pp.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 14 February 2013
8. TABLES
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 15 February 2013
Table 1. Mean monthly air temperature and cumulative precipitation for two weather reporting
stations near the Project area, April−July 2012.
Mean Air Temperature (° F) Cumulative Precipitation (inches)
Station 1 Month 30-yr Mean 2012 Anomaly 30-yr Mean 2012 Anomaly
Cantwell 4E April 27.2 30.7 3.5 0.71 1.14 0.43
May 41.4 40.2 –1.2 0.77 0.59 –0.18
June 51.3 51.3 0 1.87 1.06 –0.81
July 55.2 52.1 –3.1 2.53 1.29 –1.24
Chulitna River April 30.6 35.9 5.3 1.38 0.53 –0.85
May 42.8 41.7 –1.1 1.03 0.59 –0.44
June 52.8 52.0 –0.8 1.65 3.74 2.09
July 55.5 52.4 –3.1 3.92 2.30 –1.62
Notes:
1 Source: Global Historical Climatology Network − Daily. 2012. National Climatic Data Center, U.S. Department of Commerce.
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/ghcn-daily/index.php
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 16 February 2013
Table 2. Number and condition of Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nests from surveys during the
breeding season, fall, and early winter in the 2012 raptor study area.
Nest Condition
Species Study Area Section Good Fair Poor Remnant Unknown Total
Bald Eagle Chulitna 6 2 0 1 0 9
Denali 2 2 0 0 0 4
Gold Creek 7 0 0 2 2 11
Reservoir 15 2 0 0 0 17
Total 30 6 0 3 2 41
Golden Eagle Chulitna 11 5 7 1 0 24
Denali 13 1 7 4 5 0 29
Gold Creek 13 5 4 5 0 27
Reservoir 11 2 4 2 0 19
Total 48 19 19 13 0 99
Notes:
1 Includes one nest located 100 m outside 2012 raptor study area, but the associated territory was within the study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 17 February 2013
Table 3. Raptor nests located at elevations below 2,050 feet (predicted maximum pool) in the
reservoir section of the 2012 raptor study area.
Species Nest ID Nest Occupancy Nest Condition
Bald Eagle SU001BAEA Occupied Good
SU002BAEA Occupied Good
SU020BAEA Occupied Good
SU021BAEA Unknown Good
SU030BAEA Occupied Good
SU031BAEA Unoccupied Good
SU032BAEA Occupied Good
SU045BAEA Unoccupied Good
Golden Eagle SU015GOEA Occupied Good
SU098GOEA Unoccupied Poor
Peregrine Falcon SU003PEFA Occupied 1 Unknown
SU004PEFA Occupied 1 Unknown
SU005PEFA Occupied 2 Unknown
SU006PEFA Occupied 2 Unknown
SU009PEFA Occupied Good
SU011PEFA Occupied 1 Unknown
SU092GOEA Occupied Good
Common Raven SU001CORA Occupied Good
SU002CORA Unoccupied Good
SU003CORA Unoccupied Good
SU004CORA Occupied Good
SU005CORA Unoccupied Fair
SU006CORA Occupied Good
SU007CORA Occupied Good
SU008CORA Unoccupied Good
SU009CORA Unoccupied Remnant
SU010CORA Unoccupied Good
SU011CORA Unoccupied Good
SU023CORA Unoccupied Good
SU027CORA Unoccupied Fair
Unidentified raptor SU001XRAP Unoccupied Fair
SU004XRAP Unoccupied Poor
SU020XRAP Unoccupied Remnant
Notes:
1 These 3 nest ledges were likely within 1 territory and had evidence they previously hatched young, but pair did not appear to
nest in 2012.
2 These 2 nest ledges were likely within 1 territory and had evidence they previously hatched young, but pair did not appear to
nest in 2012.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 18 February 2013
Table 4. Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nest success and territory occupancy in the 2012 raptor
study area. Numbers in parentheses indicate additional possible territories or nests,
due to unknown occupancy status of some nests.
Species Study Area Section
Total No.
of Nests
No. of
Occupied
Nests
No. of
Occupied
Territories1
No. of
Incubating
Pairs
No. of
Successful
Pairs2
No. of
Nestlings2
Bald Eagle Chulitna 8 5 (1) 5 3 2 3
Denali 3 1 1 1 1 1
Gold Creek 8 4 3 2 1 1
Reservoir 15 9 (1) 8 (1) 6 4 5
Total 34 19 (2) 17 (1) 12 8 10
Golden Eagle Chulitna 24 9 5 2 0 0
Denali 29 5 3 (3) 5 3 (2) 4 3 2 3 2 3
Gold Creek 27 12 (1) 10 4 3 4
Reservoir 19 6 (1) 5 (1) 3 1 2
Total 99 32 (5) 25 (3) 13 6 8
Notes:
1 Some occupied territories contained several occupied nests.
2 Young ≥75% of fledging age (estimated by comparing with known-age photos).
3 One occupied nest that produced a nestling was located 100 m outside the 2012 raptor survey area. However, alternate nests
and the occupying pair’s territory were located within the study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 19 February 2013
Table 5. Nest success and territory occupancy for other species of raptors in the 2012 raptor
study area. Numbers in parentheses indicate additional possible territories or nests,
due to unknown occupancy status of some nests.
Species Study Area Section
Total No.
of Nests
No. of
Occupied
Nests
No. of
Occupied
Territories1
No. of
Incubating
Pairs
No. of
Successful
Pairs2
No. of
Nestlings2
Red-tailed Hawk Gold Creek 1 1 1 1 1 1
Gyrfalcon 3 Denali 3 3 3 3 0 0
Gold Creek 1 1 1 1 0 0
Reservoir 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 5 4 4 4 0 0
Peregrine Falcon 3 Chulitna 2 2 1 1 0 0
Gold Creek 1 1 1 1 0 0
Reservoir 8 8 5 2 1 3
Total 11 11 7 4 1 3
Common Raven 4 Denali 2 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 – –
Gold Creek 9 2 2 2 – –
Reservoir 13 4 4 4 – –
Total 24 6 (1) 6 (1) 6 – –
Unidentified raptor Chulitna 4 2 0 0 0 0
Denali 2 0 0 0 0 0
Gold Creek 10 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 0 0
Reservoir 3 0 0 0 0 0
Total 19 2 (1) 0 (1) 0 0 0
Notes:
1 Occupied territories often contained several occupied nests.
2 Young ≥75% of fledging age (estimated by comparing with known-age photos).
3 Ledges and nests were only recorded if currently occupied by a Peregrine Falcon or Gyrfalcon, except for one Gyrfalcon nest
that showed years of repeated use, as evidenced by a fresh nest bowl maintained on top of >1 m of accumulated feces.
4 Nest success and nestling data were unknown because juveniles fledged before productivity surveys were conducted.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 20 February 2013
Table 6. Number and condition of Red-tailed Hawk, Common Raven, and unidentified raptor
nests located in the 2012 raptor study area.
Nest Condition
Species Study Area Section Good Fair Poor Remnant Unknown Total
Red-tailed Hawk Gold Creek 1 0 0 0 0 1
Common Raven Chulitna 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denali 2 0 0 0 0 2
Gold Creek 7 1 0 1 0 9
Reservoir 10 2 0 1 0 13
Total 19 3 0 2 0 24
Unknown raptor Chulitna 3 0 0 1 0 4
Denali 0 1 0 1 0 2
Gold Creek 4 0 1 4 1 10
Reservoir 0 1 1 1 0 3
Total 7 2 2 7 1 19
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 21 February 2013
9. FIGURES
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 22 February 2013
Figure 1. Raptor study area in 2012 for the proposed Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 23 February 2013
Figure 2. Distribution and occupancy of Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle nests in the 2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 24 February 2013
Figure 3. Nest occupancy and distribution of nesting habitat of Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles in the reservoir section of the 2012 rapt or study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 25 February 2013
Figure 4. Nest occupancy and distribution of nesting habitat of Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles in the Chulitna and Gold Creek corridor sections of the 2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 26 February 2013
Figure 5. Nest occupancy and distribution of nesting habitats of Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles in the Denali corridor section of the 201 2 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 27 February 2013
Figure 6. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the 2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 28 February 2013
Figure 7. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the Denali corridor section of the 2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 29 February 2013
Figure 8. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the Chulitna and Gold Creek corridor sections of the 2012 rapto r study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 30 February 2013
Figure 9. Distribution and occupancy of other raptor nests in the reservoir section of the 2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 31 February 2013
Figure 10. Distribution of topographic slope values at Golden Eagle nest sites in the 2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 32 February 2013
Figure 11. Distribution of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values at Golden Eagle nest sites found in the
2012 raptor study area.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 33 February 2013
10. APPENDICES
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 February 2013
Appendix 1:
Species, Nest ID, and Occupancy Status of All Raptor Nests Found in
the 2012 Raptor Study Area
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 - Page 1 February 2013
Appendix 1. Species, nest ID, and occupancy status of all raptor nests found in the 2012 raptor
study area.
Common Name Nest ID Occupancy Maximum Occupancy Status1
Bald Eagle SU001BAEA Occupied Incubating
SU002BAEA Occupied Incubating
SU003BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU004BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU005BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU006BAEA Occupied Incubating
SU007BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU008BAEA Occupied Incubating
SU009BAEA Occupied Incubating
SU010BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU011BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU012BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU013BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU014BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU015BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU016BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU017BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU018BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU019BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU020BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU021BAEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU022BAEA Occupied Incubating
SU023BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU024BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU025BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU026BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU027BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU028BAEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU029BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU030BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU031BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU032BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU033BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU034BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU035BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU036BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU037BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU038BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU039BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 – Page 2 February 2013
Common Name Nest ID Occupancy Maximum Occupancy Status1
Bald Eagle SU040BAEA Occupied Occupied
SU041BAEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU042BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU043BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU044BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU045BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU046BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU047BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU048BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU049BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU050BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU051BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU052BAEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
Red-tailed Hawk SU093GOEA2 Occupied Fledged
Golden Eagle SU001GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU002GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU003GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU004GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU005GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU006GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU007GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU008GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU009GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU010GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU011GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU012GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU013GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU014GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU015GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU016GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU017GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU018GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU019GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU020GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU021GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU022GOEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU023GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU024GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU025GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU026GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU027GOEA Occupied Occupied
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 – Page 3 February 2013
Common Name Nest ID Occupancy Maximum Occupancy Status1
Golden Eagle SU028GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU029GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU030GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU031GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU032GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU033GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU034GOEA Occupied Successful
SU035GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU036GOEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU037GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU038GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU039GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU040GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU041GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU042GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU043GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU044GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU045GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU046GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU047GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU048GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU049GOEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU050GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU051GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU052GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU053GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU054GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU055GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU056GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU057GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU058GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU059GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU060GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU061GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU062GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU063GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU064GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU065GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU066GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU067GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU068GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU069GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 – Page 4 February 2013
Common Name Nest ID Occupancy Maximum Occupancy Status1
Golden Eagle SU070GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU071GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU072GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU073GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU074GOEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU075GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU076GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU077GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU078GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU079GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU080GOEA Occupied Occupied
SU081GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU082GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU083GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU084GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU085GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU086GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU087GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU088GOEA Occupied Incubating
SU089GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU090GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU094GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU095GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU096GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU097GOEA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU098GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU099GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU100GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU101GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU102GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU103GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU104GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU105GOEA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU106GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU107GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU108GOEA Unoccupied Unoccupied
Merlin SU001MERL Occupied Occupied
SU002MERL Occupied Occupied
Gyrfalcon SU001GYRF Occupied Incubating
SU002GYRF Occupied Incubating
SU003GYRF Occupied Incubating
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 – Page 5 February 2013
Common Name Nest ID Occupancy Maximum Occupancy Status1
Gyrfalcon SU004GYRF Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU091GOEA2 Occupied Incubating
Peregrine Falcon SU001PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU002PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU003PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU004PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU005PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU006PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU007PEFA Occupied Incubating
SU008PEFA Occupied Incubating
SU009PEFA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU010PEFA Occupied >75% of fledging age
SU011PEFA Occupied Occupied
SU092GOEA2 Occupied Incubating
Common Raven SU001CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU002CORA Occupied Fledged
SU003CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU004CORA Occupied Successful
SU005CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU006CORA Occupied Incubating
SU007CORA Occupied Incubating
SU008CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU009CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU010CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU011CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU012CORA Occupied Incubating
SU013CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU014CORA Occupied Incubating
SU015CORA Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU016CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU017CORA Occupied Fledged
SU018CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU019CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU020CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU021CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU022CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU023CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU024CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU025CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU026CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU027CORA Unoccupied Unoccupied
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 1 – Page 6 February 2013
Common Name Nest ID Occupancy Maximum Occupancy Status1
Unidentified raptor SU001XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU002XFAL Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU002XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU003XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU004XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU005XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU006XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU008XRAP Occupied Occupied
SU009XRAP Occupied Occupied
SU010XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU011XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU012XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU013XRAP Occupied Unknown occupancy
SU014XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU015XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU016XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU017XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU018XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU019XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
SU020XRAP Unoccupied Unoccupied
Notes:
1 Maximum Occupancy Status indicates the most advanced stage of breeding recorded in 2012.
2 Nesting in a nest constructed by Golden Eagles.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 2 February 2013
Appendix 2:
Number and Condition of Raptor Nests Found Outside of the 2012
Raptor Study Area on Surveys during the Breeding Season, Fall, and
Early Winter
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 2 - Page 1 February 2013
Appendix 2. Number and condition of raptor nests found outside of the 2012 raptor study area
on surveys during the breeding season, fall, and early winter.
Nearest Study Nest Condition
Species Area Section Good Fair Poor Remnant Unknown Total
Golden Eagle Chulitna 0 0 1 0 0 1
Reservoir 3 0 0 0 0 3
Bald Eagle Denali 0 1 0 0 0 1
Gold Creek 2 0 0 0 0 2
Reservoir 2 1 0 0 0 3
Downstream1 8 0 1 0 0 9
Common Raven Chulitna 0 1 0 0 0 1
Gold Creek 2 0 0 0 0 2
Unidentified raptor Chulitna 0 0 1 0 0 1
Notes:
1 Bald Eagle nests located downstream from the 2012 raptor study area and upstream from Talkeetna.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 3 February 2013
Appendix 3:
Occupancy and Success of Raptor Nests and Territories Found
Outside of the 2012 Raptor Study Area
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 3 – Page 1 February 2013
Appendix 3. Occupancy and success of raptor nests and territories found outside of the 2012
raptor study area.
Species
Nearest Study
Area Section
Total
No. of
Nests
No. of
Occupied
Nests
No. of
Occupied
Territories
No. of
Incubating
Pairs
No. of
Successful
Pairs
No. of
Nestlings
Bald Eagle Gold Creek 2 1 1 1 1 1
Reservoir 3 2 2 1 1 2
Downstream1 5 3 3 – – –
Golden Eagle Chulitna 1 0 0 0 0 0
Reservoir 3 2 2 2 1 1
Peregrine Falcon Gold Creek 1 1 1 1 1 1
Common Raven Chulitna 1 0 0 0 0 0
Gold Creek2 2 1 1 1 1 –
Unidentified raptor Chulitna 1 0 0 0 0 0
Notes:
1 Nests located downstream from the 2012 raptor survey area and upstream from Talkeetna.
2 Nestling data unknown because juveniles fledged before productivity surveys began.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 4 February 2013
Appendix 4:
Summaries of Bald Eagle Surveys Conducted during Fall and Early
Winter in 2012
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 4 - Page 1 February 2013
Appendix 4. Summaries of Bald Eagle surveys conducted during fall and early winter in 2012.
SURVEY 1: OCTOBER 17, 2012
Snow cover was 100% in the study area during this survey. Pancake ice (50% coverage) was
flowing in the mid and upper Susitna and Nenana rivers. All other streams were still ice-free, but
all but the largest lakes were frozen (High Lake: 50% ice, Deadman and Big Lakes: 10% ice,
western Fog Lakes: 20% ice, Stephan Lake: 80% ice).
We recorded 21 Bald Eagles within the study area boundaries (16 adults, 5 subadults). Three
eagles were found on Portage Creek, five on Indian River, three on the lower Susitna River, nine
at Stephan Lake and upper Prairie Creek, and one on the Oshetna River. Most were single birds
or pairs; the exception being the nine Bald Eagles in the Stephan Lake and Prairie Creek area.
Prey remains were visible on ice on Stephan Lake. Several Common Ravens were feeding on the
prey remains, while two Bald Eagles were perched in the immediate area. No salmon carcasses
were obvious in the open water of Prairie Creek or Stephan Lake. Prairie Creek had the majority
of waterfowl observations: Trumpeter Swan (50 adults and brood groups), Mallards (40+), and a
few divers (20+ birds, including one Goldeneye, one Bufflehead, 10 scaup, two Red-Breasted
Mergansers, and unidentified divers (10+). Swans also were seen flying over the eastern Fog
Lakes, but open water did not occur there. Only a few waterfowl were recorded in the lower
Susitna River, generally outside the study area. Salmon carcasses were obvious at one location
on the Susitna River just south of Gold Creek. The lack of salmon carcasses throughout the area
may have reflected flooding events that occurred in the area in September.
During this survey leaves were off the trees and snow in nests made them more visible, aiding in
locating five additional Bald Eagle nests within the study area. The occupancy status of these
nests for the 2012 breeding season could not be determined this late in the season, but if the nests
were occupied (based on the 1 km inter-nest distance criterion to delineate new territories), those
five nests could represent up to three new Bald Eagle territories. We also discovered another nest
outside of the Denali corridor on the Nenana River that could represent an additional territory.
SURVEY 2: OCTOBER 31, 2012
Snow cover was 100% in most of the study area except for a few small south-facing hillsides at
lower elevations. All lakes in the study area were frozen or observed to be frozen by our pilot,
who had been flying extensively in the study area within the previous three days (Q. Slade,
Quicksilver Air, personal communication). Indian River was mainly ice-free but had some
bottom ice in the lower stretches. Portage Creek had many areas with 75% bottom ice and the
upper stretches had >50% surface ice. The Susitna River had 60% pancake ice and had bottom
ice in portions of the upper river. The Oshetna River had 10% surface ice, 20% bottom ice, and
20% flowing pancake ice. Jay Creek had limited flow with 50–80% surface ice. Kosina Creek
had 70% top ice and 90% bottom ice in the lower portions and more gravel bottom in the upper
portions. The outlet of Stephan Lake was the only open portion of the lake, Murder Lake was
frozen while Prairie Creek was ice-free. The Nenana River had 80% surface ice and 60% bottom
ice.
We recorded five adult Bald Eagles within the study area boundaries during this survey. This
was a sharp decline from the 21 Bald Eagles found during the first survey on October 17, 2012.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 4 – Page 2 February 2013
All Bald Eagles were recorded as single birds during this survey. One bird was recorded on
Indian River, one on the Susitna River between the outlets of Indian River and Portage Creek,
two on Portage Creek, and one at the outlet of Stephan Lake. The latter Bald Eagle was perched
in a tree above an adult and juvenile swan, which were feeding in the open water. The open
waters of Prairie Creek, from the outlet of Stephan Lake to the boundary of the raptor study area,
were the only areas with waterfowl observations (five adult, two juvenile swans). No ducks or
geese, salmon carcasses, or other animal carcasses were observed in any part of the raptor study
area. During this second fall survey, we located two additional Bald Eagle nests in the raptor
study area. Both of those nests could potentially represent new territories.
SURVEY 3: NOVEMBER 13, 2012
The flight plan for this survey was to search for Bald Eagles where they were found on previous
surveys (October 31) and where open water was suspected to occur. This included Indian and
Portage Creek, the section of the Susitna River within the raptor study area downstream of the
confluence with Portage Creek, Stephan Lake, Murder Lake, and Prairie Creek.
Indian River was intermittently frozen, frozen with some small leads of open water, or
completely open. The Susitna River was mostly flowing with lots of pancake ice and ice along
the shore. Portage Creek was largely open with ice along the edges and pancake ice near the
mouth. However, some sections of Portage Creek were completely iced over. Stephan Lake and
Murder Lake were frozen, while Prairie Creek between the lakes was open.
We recorded five Bald Eagles (all adults; three singles, one pair) during this survey, the same
number of Bald Eagles located during the previous fall survey in October. One bird was located
on upper Indian River, one on lower Indian River, one on the Susitna River downstream of
Indian River, and the pair was on Prairie Creek between Stephan Lake and Murder Lake. The
pair of Bald Eagles below Stephan Lake was perched in a tree above 11 mallards and 2 adult
Trumpeter Swans feeding in the open water. Although Prairie Creek below Murder Lake was
partially open, no waterfowl or Eagles were recorded. No salmon, salmon carcasses, or other
animal carcasses were observed during this survey.
SURVEY 4: DECEMBER 14, 2012
The flight plan for this survey was to search for Bald Eagles where they were found on previous
surveys (November 13) and where open water was suspected to occur. Surveys were delayed by
one to two weeks because of limited helicopter availability and cold temperatures (below
−30° F). No Bald Eagles were recorded during this survey. On the previous survey, observers
located Bald Eagles on Indian River and Portage Creek, the section of the Susitna River
downstream of the mouth of Portage Creek, and Prairie Creek at the outlet of Stephan Lake.
During this survey, Indian River was 50–75% frozen in the upper and lower sections, while the
middle portion was 100% frozen. Portage Creek was 100% frozen. The Susitna River,
downstream of the mouth of Portage Creek and within the raptor study area, had an open channel
about 50 feet wide, with some pancake ice flowing. Bottom ice was present on the Susitna River
between the outlets of Indian and Portage Creeks. Prairie Creek, between Stephan Lake and
Murder Lake, was still open. However, Prairie Creek below Murder Lake was 100% frozen.
Both Murder Lake and Stephan Lake were 100% frozen, however, near the outlet of Stephan
Lake, patches of perforated bottom ice were seen, implying the presence of springs.
2012 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EAGLES AND OTHER RAPTORS
Susitna–Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Appendix 4 – Page 3 February 2013
Although Bald Eagles were not seen during this survey, we located four mallards and an
American Dipper in the open section of Prairie Creek. The presence of the dipper suggests that
the water may remain open there the entire winter.