HomeMy WebLinkAboutSuWa179Alaska Resources Library & Information Services
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document
ARLIS Uniform Cover Page
Title:
Report to the legislature 2012
SuWa 179
Author(s) – Personal:
Author(s) – Corporate:
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project ; Alaska Energy Authority
AEA-identified category, if specified:
Annual reports
AEA-identified series, if specified:
Series (ARLIS-assigned report number):
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project document number 179
Existing numbers on document:
Published by:
[Anchorage] : Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project, [2012]
Date published:
2012
Published for:
Alaska Legislature
Date or date range of report:
Volume and/or Part numbers:
Final or Draft status, as indicated:
Document type:
Pagination:
22 p.
Related work(s):
Pages added/changed by ARLIS:
Notes:
All reports in the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document series include an ARLIS-
produced cover page and an ARLIS-assigned number for uniformity and citability. All reports
are posted online at http://www.arlis.org/resources/susitna-watana/
Report to the Legislature2012
Report to the Legislature 20122
Table of Contents
“I am committed to expanding
and diversifying Alaska’s economy and
to unlocking Alaska’s energy resources
for Alaskans’ benefit. One cornerstone of a
long-term and comprehensive energy strategy
is Susitna-Watana Hydro.”
Gov. Sean Parnell
Letter from the Executive Director .......................2
Introduction ..........................................................3
2012 Key Accomplishments .................................4
Project at a Glance and Map ................................5
Proposed Study Plan ............................................7
Proposed Study Plan At-A-Glance .......................9
2012 Field Studies ..............................................11
Investing in Renewable Energy ..........................13
Project Economics ..............................................14
History of Susitna-Watana Hydro ........................15
Public Outreach ..................................................17
Stakeholder Engagement ...................................18
Expenditures .......................................................19
Project Team .......................................................20
AEA Renewable Energy Strategy .......................21
A year ago, the Alaska Energy Authority filed its Pre-Application Document
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which officially kicked off the
licensing process for Susitna-Watana Hydro. I am proud of our entire project
team and their many accomplishments this past year. Their work is helping to
bring the benefits of Susitna-Watana Hydro closer to reality for Alaska.
For the first time since the 1980s, field studies were conducted to gather
additional data. Eighteen studies were conducted with the help of more than
100 fieldworkers in a variety of disciplines. From geology to wildlife, water
and ice characteristics to fish and more, this early field season was a success.
Detailed results are being compiled, but preliminary analysis supports many of
the findings from previous studies in the 1980s.
Weather conditions this past year also allowed the project teams to observe a
wide variety of naturally occurring river conditions, including extreme snow and
ice conditions in the Spring, and high water and flow rates during the September
flooding situations along the river system. This variety was helpful as it provided
a range of conditions typically not scene over the course of one year.
While the field teams gathered information, the project leads worked tirelessly
on developing a Proposed Study Plan that includes 58 studies to be conducted
during the next two years. Working with other agencies and stakeholders, the
team conducted many technical workgroup meetings to revise the plan in
time to submit a final Revised Study Plan to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) in December. That plan is now being reviewed and we
anticipate a decision by FERC in the coming weeks.
Our goal for 2013 is to implement the study plan and continue moving forward
towards a license to build. We also plan to continue educating the public
about the project and its benefits to businesses and residents from Fairbanks
to Homer.
This report provides an overview of activities during the past year. We welcome
any questions and comments, and look forward to working with legislators
and the administration as we make progress in providing solutions to Alaska’s
energy challenges.
Sincerely,
Sara Fisher-Goad
Executive Director
Alaska Energy Authority
Susitna-Watana Hydro 2
LETTER FROM THE ExECuTivE diRECTOR
Report to the Legislature 20122
Table of Contents
“I am committed to expanding
and diversifying Alaska’s economy and
to unlocking Alaska’s energy resources
for Alaskans’ benefit. One cornerstone of a
long-term and comprehensive energy strategy
is Susitna-Watana Hydro.”
Gov. Sean Parnell
Letter from the Executive Director .......................2
Introduction ..........................................................3
2012 Key Accomplishments .................................4
Project at a Glance and Map ................................5
Proposed Study Plan ............................................7
Proposed Study Plan At-A-Glance .......................9
2012 Field Studies ..............................................11
Investing in Renewable Energy ..........................13
Project Economics ..............................................14
History of Susitna-Watana Hydro ........................15
Public Outreach ..................................................17
Stakeholder Engagement ...................................18
Expenditures .......................................................19
Project Team .......................................................20
AEA Renewable Energy Strategy .......................21
A year ago, the Alaska Energy Authority filed its Pre-Application Document
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which officially kicked off the
licensing process for Susitna-Watana Hydro. I am proud of our entire project
team and their many accomplishments this past year. Their work is helping to
bring the benefits of Susitna-Watana Hydro closer to reality for Alaska.
For the first time since the 1980s, field studies were conducted to gather
additional data. Eighteen studies were conducted with the help of more than
100 fieldworkers in a variety of disciplines. From geology to wildlife, water
and ice characteristics to fish and more, this early field season was a success.
Detailed results are being compiled, but preliminary analysis supports many of
the findings from previous studies in the 1980s.
Weather conditions this past year also allowed the project teams to observe a
wide variety of naturally occurring river conditions, including extreme snow and
ice conditions in the Spring, and high water and flow rates during the September
flooding situations along the river system. This variety was helpful as it provided
a range of conditions typically not scene over the course of one year.
While the field teams gathered information, the project leads worked tirelessly
on developing a Proposed Study Plan that includes 58 studies to be conducted
during the next two years. Working with other agencies and stakeholders, the
team conducted many technical workgroup meetings to revise the plan in
time to submit a final Revised Study Plan to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) in December. That plan is now being reviewed and we
anticipate a decision by FERC in the coming weeks.
Our goal for 2013 is to implement the study plan and continue moving forward
towards a license to build. We also plan to continue educating the public
about the project and its benefits to businesses and residents from Fairbanks
to Homer.
This report provides an overview of activities during the past year. We welcome
any questions and comments, and look forward to working with legislators
and the administration as we make progress in providing solutions to Alaska’s
energy challenges.
Sincerely,
Sara Fisher-Goad
Executive Director
Alaska Energy Authority
Susitna-Watana Hydro 2
LETTER FROM THE ExECuTivE diRECTOR
WATER
For more than a century, Alaskans have harnessed power from
water. Today, hydropower – from nearly forty separate projects -
supplies 21 percent of all the electricity generated in Alaska.
2012 FOCUS: Public Outreach • Early Field Studies • Study Planning • Stakeholder Collaboration
pOwER
Report to the Legislature 20123
In the context of all renewable energy generated statewide, hydro makes
up about 90 percent. Wind, solar, geothermal and other renewable sources
combined provide the balance.
Nationally, hydropower accounts for 7 percent of all electricity generated
and more than 65 percent of renewable energy sources. Regions with high
concentrations of hydropower generation typically enjoy lower - and more
stable - power costs compared with traditionally fueled communities.
With more than 3,000 rivers and waterways, Alaska is well-positioned to continue
taking advantage of the benefits of hydropower for generations to come.
Licensing progress
Public scoping meetings were held in several communities as part of the FERC licensing process. AEA attended
each of these meetings to hear feedback from the public and other stakeholders. Communities visited includes:
Anchorage, Wasilla, Glennallen, Talkeetna, Cantwell and Fairbanks.
Study plan
A significant amount of the 2012 effort was spent developing a study plan for the project. The plan is a key part of the
licensing process and outlines the studies that will be conducted to provide a better understanding of the Susitna
Basin. The Proposed Study Plan was submitted to FERC in July and includes 58 studies. AEA conducted technical
workgroup meetings to collaborate further with stakeholders on the proposed studies. In December, AEA submitted
a Revised Study Plan for FERC approval.
Engineering
Engineering work for Susitna-Watana Hydro continues to progress. During 2012, the project team increased the
proposed height of the dam to optimize power production and increase valuable winter storage of water. Additional
engineering achievements include:
• Progress refining engineering
• Brought on independent board of consultants
• Identified three potential access and transmission routes and worked with Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities on a high-level analysis
Fieldwork
2012 was a milestone year in many ways for Susitna-Watana Hydro. More than 100 field workers were able to conduct
18 initial studies that will provide valuable data to add to additional information gathered in the 1980s and future data
obtained via the environmental field program.
independent Cost Estimate
AEA requested an independent cost estimate for Susitna-Watana Hydro to provide a higher degree of confidence to
stakeholders about anticipated costs. Results of this study were within nine percent of the original estimate, which is
considered to be positive for a project of this scope.
Buy Alaska
Worked with vendors to establish a mechanism to track Alaska-based employment and spending.
Stakeholder Engagement
AEA is committed to working with stakeholders to address their questions and concerns about the project. The
project team has adopted an “open, accurate and collaborative” approach to managing stakeholder expectations
and providing information to the public, other agencies and a variety of stakeholders.
An Alaska Native outreach liaison is a key member of the project team and helps to engage Alaska Native communities
and corporations about the project. AEA also implemented a public outreach program to help educate Alaskans
about the project. Public outreach included:
• More than 20 community visits
• Roughly 50 stakeholder and technical workgroup meetings
• About 75 community presentations
• Initial meetings and conversations with Alaska Native landowners
• A new project website to more effectively communicate with Alaskans and stakeholders
Staffing
AEA has a world-class, experienced team and continues to add resources as needed to make sure the project is
managed and developed effectively and efficiently. During 2012, the team added a project economist, environmental
technician, and licensing and permitting manager.
2012 KEy ACCOMpLiSHMEnTS
Susitna-Watana Hydro 4
WATER
For more than a century, Alaskans have harnessed power from
water. Today, hydropower – from nearly forty separate projects -
supplies 21 percent of all the electricity generated in Alaska.
2012 FOCUS: Public Outreach • Early Field Studies • Study Planning • Stakeholder Collaboration
pOwER
Report to the Legislature 20123
In the context of all renewable energy generated statewide, hydro makes
up about 90 percent. Wind, solar, geothermal and other renewable sources
combined provide the balance.
Nationally, hydropower accounts for 7 percent of all electricity generated
and more than 65 percent of renewable energy sources. Regions with high
concentrations of hydropower generation typically enjoy lower - and more
stable - power costs compared with traditionally fueled communities.
With more than 3,000 rivers and waterways, Alaska is well-positioned to continue
taking advantage of the benefits of hydropower for generations to come.
Licensing progress
Public scoping meetings were held in several communities as part of the FERC licensing process. AEA attended
each of these meetings to hear feedback from the public and other stakeholders. Communities visited includes:
Anchorage, Wasilla, Glennallen, Talkeetna, Cantwell and Fairbanks.
Study plan
A significant amount of the 2012 effort was spent developing a study plan for the project. The plan is a key part of the
licensing process and outlines the studies that will be conducted to provide a better understanding of the Susitna
Basin. The Proposed Study Plan was submitted to FERC in July and includes 58 studies. AEA conducted technical
workgroup meetings to collaborate further with stakeholders on the proposed studies. In December, AEA submitted
a Revised Study Plan for FERC approval.
Engineering
Engineering work for Susitna-Watana Hydro continues to progress. During 2012, the project team increased the
proposed height of the dam to optimize power production and increase valuable winter storage of water. Additional
engineering achievements include:
• Progress refining engineering
• Brought on independent board of consultants
• Identified three potential access and transmission routes and worked with Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities on a high-level analysis
Fieldwork
2012 was a milestone year in many ways for Susitna-Watana Hydro. More than 100 field workers were able to conduct
18 initial studies that will provide valuable data to add to additional information gathered in the 1980s and future data
obtained via the environmental field program.
independent Cost Estimate
AEA requested an independent cost estimate for Susitna-Watana Hydro to provide a higher degree of confidence to
stakeholders about anticipated costs. Results of this study were within nine percent of the original estimate, which is
considered to be positive for a project of this scope.
Buy Alaska
Worked with vendors to establish a mechanism to track Alaska-based employment and spending.
Stakeholder Engagement
AEA is committed to working with stakeholders to address their questions and concerns about the project. The
project team has adopted an “open, accurate and collaborative” approach to managing stakeholder expectations
and providing information to the public, other agencies and a variety of stakeholders.
An Alaska Native outreach liaison is a key member of the project team and helps to engage Alaska Native communities
and corporations about the project. AEA also implemented a public outreach program to help educate Alaskans
about the project. Public outreach included:
• More than 20 community visits
• Roughly 50 stakeholder and technical workgroup meetings
• About 75 community presentations
• Initial meetings and conversations with Alaska Native landowners
• A new project website to more effectively communicate with Alaskans and stakeholders
Staffing
AEA has a world-class, experienced team and continues to add resources as needed to make sure the project is
managed and developed effectively and efficiently. During 2012, the team added a project economist, environmental
technician, and licensing and permitting manager.
2012 KEy ACCOMpLiSHMEnTS
Susitna-Watana Hydro 4
TALKEETNA
ANCHORAGE
WASILLA
Talkeetna River
MacLaren Riv e r
Oshetn
a
Ri
ver FAIRBANKS
COOK INLET
Ch
uli
t
na RiverYent
na
Ri
ver
87 River Miles Downstream
Susitna River22 to 32 River
Miles Downstream
DEVILS CANYON
SUSITNA-WATANA DAMSUSITNA-WATANA DAM
Location:
River mile 184, above
Devils Canyon
Size:
735-foot high dam
Reservoir:
About 42-miles long,
average width of 1 mile
Estimated Supply:
About 50 percent of Railbelt
electrical demand
Cost:
$5.19 Billion
Installed Capacity:
600 MW
Annual Energy:
2,800,000 MWh
Licensing:
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC)
Project Life:
100+ years, providing
long-term, stable rates
ProjectSusitna-watana Hydro
AT A GLAnCE & MAp
TiMELinE
Preliminary Planning Design and Licensing
wE ArE hErE
Construction
2011
• Open Houses
• Authorization
• Study Gap Analyses
• Preliminary Permit
Application to FErC
2010
• Preliminary Decision
Document
• Field Studies
• Public Involvement
• Permit Applications
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12
• Environmental Impact
Statement Preparation
• Agency Approvals
(7 years)
STA rT UP20242012
Report to the Legislature 20125
TALKEETNA
ANCHORAGE
WASILLA
Talkeetna River
MacLaren Riv e r
Oshetn
a
Ri
ver FAIRBANKS
COOK INLET
Ch
uli
t
na RiverYent
na
Ri
ver
87 River Miles Downstream
Susitna River22 to 32 River
Miles Downstream
DEVILS CANYON
SUSITNA-WATANA DAMSUSITNA-WATANA DAM
STA rT UP2024 Devils Canyon, a natural fish barrier
Susitna-Watana Hydro 6
TALKEETNA
ANCHORAGE
WASILLA
Talkeetna River
MacLaren Riv e r
Oshetn
a
Ri
ver FAIRBANKS
COOK INLET
Ch
uli
t
na RiverYent
na
Ri
ver
87 River Miles Downstream
Susitna River22 to 32 River
Miles Downstream
DEVILS CANYON
SUSITNA-WATANA DAMSUSITNA-WATANA DAM
Location:
River mile 184, above
Devils Canyon
Size:
735-foot high dam
Reservoir:
About 42-miles long,
average width of 1 mile
Estimated Supply:
About 50 percent of Railbelt
electrical demand
Cost:
$5.19 Billion
Installed Capacity:
600 MW
Annual Energy:
2,800,000 MWh
Licensing:
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC)
Project Life:
100+ years, providing
long-term, stable rates
ProjectSusitna-watana Hydro
AT A GLAnCE & MAp
TiMELinE
Preliminary Planning Design and Licensing
wE ArE hErE
Construction
2011
• Open Houses
• Authorization
• Study Gap Analyses
• Preliminary Permit
Application to FErC
2010
• Preliminary Decision
Document
• Field Studies
• Public Involvement
• Permit Applications
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12
• Environmental Impact
Statement Preparation
• Agency Approvals
(7 years)
STA rT UP20242012
Report to the Legislature 20125
TALKEETNA
ANCHORAGE
WASILLA
Talkeetna River
MacLaren Riv e r
Oshetn
a
Ri
ver FAIRBANKS
COOK INLET
Ch
uli
t
na RiverYent
na
Ri
ver
87 River Miles Downstream
Susitna River22 to 32 River
Miles Downstream
DEVILS CANYON
SUSITNA-WATANA DAMSUSITNA-WATANA DAM
STA rT UP2024 Devils Canyon, a natural fish barrier
Susitna-Watana Hydro 6
Betsy McGregor
Environmental Manager
Betsy McGregor has more than 20 years
experience as a fisheries biologist and
environmental consultant. She brings an
extensive background in hydropower
projects across the U.S., including FERC
relicensing efforts and compliance with
the National Environmental Protection
Act, the Endangered Species Act and the
Clean Water Act.
Betsy has served on projects as the
lead field biologist and task manager
for numerous salmonid migration
studies; aquatic and terrestrial habitat
assessments; species inventories; rare,
threatened and engendered species
surveys; wetland delineations and
hydrogeomorphic functional assessments.
She has a bachelor’s in wildlife science
from Purdue University.
Studying 186,000 Acres
The Federal Energy and Regulatory Commission (FERC) is responsible
for issuing the necessary license to build and operate Susitna-Watana
Hydro. It is up to the license applicant to demonstrate the feasibility
of a project. FERC’s regulations include the following provision for
conducting studies:
Before the Commission can make an informed decision on a license
application, it must obtain adequate information on the resources the
project affects, such as soils, water quality, fish and wildlife, cultural,
recreation, aesthetics, land use, and tribal resources. To obtain this
information, it may be necessary for the applicant to conduct studies to
assess these effects so a range of potential protection, mitigation, and
enhancement measures can be explored. The Integrated Licensing
Process (ILP), developed in consultation with the hydro industry, state and
federal agencies, tribes, and non-governmental organizations (NGO), is
designed to ensure that the information needs are known before a license
application is filed through a Commission-approved study plan.
The state conducted extensive studies during the 1980s under the
Alaska Power Authority while the state was previously pursuing a FERC
license. These studies have provided the current team with more than
3,000 study documents that form the basis for the new study plan and
licensing effort.
The Alaska Energy Authority worked closely with a number of state and
federal agencies – and other statekholders – in drafting the proposed
study plan submitted to FERC in December. Out of 59 study requests
made by various stakeholders, 58 have been incorporated into the plan.
STUDY PLANpROpOSEd
Report to the Legislature 20127
The project site is remote
and inaccessible by
road. Helicopters are
the most efficient way to
transport fieldworkers and
equipment to the project
site and surrounding
areas. One base camp was
established about 20 miles
away at Stephan Lake.
During the 2012 field
season, core sampling
was conducted at the
project site.
Core samples
are meticulously
documented,
analyzed and stored.
Julia
Bosma
Licensing and
Permitting
Manager
Julia Bosma has more than 20 years of experience in
environmental permitting and regulatory compliance in
the Western U.S. She has a broad understanding of the
permitting and regulatory requirements for developing
natural resource projects on state, Federal and private lands.
She has worked to implement the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) process for a variety of resource
development and infrastructure projects to develop
environmental baseline studies and on wetlands permitting
under the Corps of Engineers. Her extensive background
includes obtaining a variety of required permits and
approvals for mining projects and mineral explorations,
power plants, permitting timber sales for the U.S. Forest
Service, highways, a gas pipeline, transmission, rail and
other projects.
Julia has a bachelor’s degree in geology from the University
of Washington and a master’s in geology from the Mackay
School of Mines at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Susitna-Watana Hydro 8
Betsy McGregor
Environmental Manager
Betsy McGregor has more than 20 years
experience as a fisheries biologist and
environmental consultant. She brings an
extensive background in hydropower
projects across the U.S., including FERC
relicensing efforts and compliance with
the National Environmental Protection
Act, the Endangered Species Act and the
Clean Water Act.
Betsy has served on projects as the
lead field biologist and task manager
for numerous salmonid migration
studies; aquatic and terrestrial habitat
assessments; species inventories; rare,
threatened and engendered species
surveys; wetland delineations and
hydrogeomorphic functional assessments.
She has a bachelor’s in wildlife science
from Purdue University.
Studying 186,000 Acres
The Federal Energy and Regulatory Commission (FERC) is responsible
for issuing the necessary license to build and operate Susitna-Watana
Hydro. It is up to the license applicant to demonstrate the feasibility
of a project. FERC’s regulations include the following provision for
conducting studies:
Before the Commission can make an informed decision on a license
application, it must obtain adequate information on the resources the
project affects, such as soils, water quality, fish and wildlife, cultural,
recreation, aesthetics, land use, and tribal resources. To obtain this
information, it may be necessary for the applicant to conduct studies to
assess these effects so a range of potential protection, mitigation, and
enhancement measures can be explored. The Integrated Licensing
Process (ILP), developed in consultation with the hydro industry, state and
federal agencies, tribes, and non-governmental organizations (NGO), is
designed to ensure that the information needs are known before a license
application is filed through a Commission-approved study plan.
The state conducted extensive studies during the 1980s under the
Alaska Power Authority while the state was previously pursuing a FERC
license. These studies have provided the current team with more than
3,000 study documents that form the basis for the new study plan and
licensing effort.
The Alaska Energy Authority worked closely with a number of state and
federal agencies – and other statekholders – in drafting the proposed
study plan submitted to FERC in December. Out of 59 study requests
made by various stakeholders, 58 have been incorporated into the plan.
STUDY PLANpROpOSEd
Report to the Legislature 20127
The project site is remote
and inaccessible by
road. Helicopters are
the most efficient way to
transport fieldworkers and
equipment to the project
site and surrounding
areas. One base camp was
established about 20 miles
away at Stephan Lake.
During the 2012 field
season, core sampling
was conducted at the
project site.
Core samples
are meticulously
documented,
analyzed and stored.
Julia
Bosma
Licensing and
Permitting
Manager
Julia Bosma has more than 20 years of experience in
environmental permitting and regulatory compliance in
the Western U.S. She has a broad understanding of the
permitting and regulatory requirements for developing
natural resource projects on state, Federal and private lands.
She has worked to implement the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) process for a variety of resource
development and infrastructure projects to develop
environmental baseline studies and on wetlands permitting
under the Corps of Engineers. Her extensive background
includes obtaining a variety of required permits and
approvals for mining projects and mineral explorations,
power plants, permitting timber sales for the U.S. Forest
Service, highways, a gas pipeline, transmission, rail and
other projects.
Julia has a bachelor’s degree in geology from the University
of Washington and a master’s in geology from the Mackay
School of Mines at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Susitna-Watana Hydro 8
Geology & Soils
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to conduct a study to
define the geologic, geotechnical, seismic and foundation
conditions at the sites of project works.
• Geology & Soils Characterization Study
STudy pLAn AT-A-GLAnCE
water resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to have studies conducted to
characterize and evaluate any potential effects to the water quality
of the Susitna River.
• Baseline Water Quality Study
• Water Quality Modeling Study
• Mercury Assessment and Potential for Bioaccumulation Study
• Groundwater-related Aquatic Habitat Study
• Geomorphology Study
• Fluvial Geomorphology Modeling below Watana Dam Study
• Ice Processes in the Susitna River Dam Study
• Glacial and Runoff Changes Study
Instream Flow Studies:
Fish Aquatics & Riparian Areas
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to study
hydrology characteristics and its relations
with fish and aquatic biota and their habitats.
• Fish and Aquatics Instream Flow Study
• Riperian Instream Flow Study
Fish & Aquatic Resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to conduct dozens of studies to better understand the Susitna
River fish populations.
• Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Upper Susitna River
• Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Middle and Lower Susitna River
• Salmon Escapement Study
• River Productivity Study
• Characterization of Aquatic Habitats in the Susitna River with Potential to be Affected
by the Susitna-Watana Project
• The Future Watana Reservoir Fish Community and Risk of Entrainment Study
• Study of Fish Passage at Watana Dam
• Study of Fish Passage Barriers in the Middle and Upper Susitna River and Susitna Tributaries
• Aquatic Resources Study within the Access Alignment, Transmission Alignment
and Construction Area
• Genetic Baseline Study for Selected Fish Species
• Analysis of Fish Harvest in and Downstream of the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Area
• Eulachon Distribution and Abundance in the Susitna River
• Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Study
Botanical resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to collect necessary baseline data to evaluate the potential
impacts to vegetation, wildlife habitat, wetland and vascular-plant resources in the project area.
• Vegetation & Wildlife Habitat Mapping Study
• Riperian Study
• Wetland Mapping Study
• Rare Plant Study
• Invasive Plant Study
Report to the Legislature 20129
Project Safety
The Alaska Energy Authority will conduct
studies to assess the stability of project
facilities during flood conditions and
to estimate earthquake ground motion
parameters.
• Probable Maximum Flood Study
• Site -Specific Seismic Hazard Study
Socioeconomic and Transportation resource
The Alaska Energy Authority will conduct a study that will
address evaluation of regional economic effects as well as
effects on social conditions and public goods and services.
• Regional Economic Evaluation Study
• Social Conditions and Public Goods
and Services Study
• Transportation Resources Study
• Health Impact Assessment Study
• Air Quality Study
Subsistence resources
The Alaska Energy Authority will conduct
subsistence studies to document traditional and
contemporary subsistence harvest and use and to
collect baseline data to facilitate the assessment
of potential impacts.
• Subsistence Baseline Documentation Study
Cultural & Paleontological Resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans
to conduct studies that will be used
to assist in identifying appropriate
protection, mitigation and enhancement
measures of cultural resources.
• Cultural Resources Study
• Paleontological Resources Study
Recreation & Aesthetic Resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to conduct several studies in order to document baseline
conditions and help assess potential impacts on recreation and aesthetic resources from
construction and operation of the proposed Susitna-Watana Hydro Project.
• Recreation Resources Study
• Aesthetics Resources Study
• Recreation Boating/River Access Study
wildlife resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to study distribution, movements, population
size, productivity and habitat of wildlife in the Susitna River and surrounding area.
• Study of Distribution, Abundance, Productivity and Survival of Moose
• Study of Distribution, Abundance, Movements and Productivity of Caribou
• Study of Distribution, Abundance and Habitat Use of Dalls Sheep
• Study of Distribution, Abundance and Habitat Use by Large Carnivores
• Study of Distribution and Abundance of Wolverines
• Study of Terrestrial Furbearer Abundance and Habitat Use
• Study of Aquatic Furbearer Abundance and Habitat Use
• Study of Species Composition and Habitat Use of Small Mammals
• Study of Distribution and Habitat Use of Little Brown Bat
• Survey Study of Eagles and Other Raptors
• Waterbird Migration, Breeding and Habitat Study
• Breeding Survey Study of Landbirds and Shorebirds
• Study of Population Ecology of Willow Ptarmigan in Game Management
Unit 13, Southcentral Alaska
• Study of Distribution and Habitat Use of Wood Frogs
• Evaluation of Wildlife Habitat Use Study
• Wildlife Harvest Analysis Study
Susitna-Watana Hydro 10
Geology & Soils
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to conduct a study to
define the geologic, geotechnical, seismic and foundation
conditions at the sites of project works.
• Geology & Soils Characterization Study
STudy pLAn AT-A-GLAnCE
water resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to have studies conducted to
characterize and evaluate any potential effects to the water quality
of the Susitna River.
• Baseline Water Quality Study
• Water Quality Modeling Study
• Mercury Assessment and Potential for Bioaccumulation Study
• Groundwater-related Aquatic Habitat Study
• Geomorphology Study
• Fluvial Geomorphology Modeling below Watana Dam Study
• Ice Processes in the Susitna River Dam Study
• Glacial and Runoff Changes Study
Instream Flow Studies:
Fish Aquatics & Riparian Areas
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to study
hydrology characteristics and its relations
with fish and aquatic biota and their habitats.
• Fish and Aquatics Instream Flow Study
• Riperian Instream Flow Study
Fish & Aquatic Resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to conduct dozens of studies to better understand the Susitna
River fish populations.
• Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Upper Susitna River
• Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Middle and Lower Susitna River
• Salmon Escapement Study
• River Productivity Study
• Characterization of Aquatic Habitats in the Susitna River with Potential to be Affected
by the Susitna-Watana Project
• The Future Watana Reservoir Fish Community and Risk of Entrainment Study
• Study of Fish Passage at Watana Dam
• Study of Fish Passage Barriers in the Middle and Upper Susitna River and Susitna Tributaries
• Aquatic Resources Study within the Access Alignment, Transmission Alignment
and Construction Area
• Genetic Baseline Study for Selected Fish Species
• Analysis of Fish Harvest in and Downstream of the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Area
• Eulachon Distribution and Abundance in the Susitna River
• Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Study
Botanical resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to collect necessary baseline data to evaluate the potential
impacts to vegetation, wildlife habitat, wetland and vascular-plant resources in the project area.
• Vegetation & Wildlife Habitat Mapping Study
• Riperian Study
• Wetland Mapping Study
• Rare Plant Study
• Invasive Plant Study
Report to the Legislature 20129
Project Safety
The Alaska Energy Authority will conduct
studies to assess the stability of project
facilities during flood conditions and
to estimate earthquake ground motion
parameters.
• Probable Maximum Flood Study
• Site -Specific Seismic Hazard Study
Socioeconomic and Transportation resource
The Alaska Energy Authority will conduct a study that will
address evaluation of regional economic effects as well as
effects on social conditions and public goods and services.
• Regional Economic Evaluation Study
• Social Conditions and Public Goods
and Services Study
• Transportation Resources Study
• Health Impact Assessment Study
• Air Quality Study
Subsistence resources
The Alaska Energy Authority will conduct
subsistence studies to document traditional and
contemporary subsistence harvest and use and to
collect baseline data to facilitate the assessment
of potential impacts.
• Subsistence Baseline Documentation Study
Cultural & Paleontological Resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans
to conduct studies that will be used
to assist in identifying appropriate
protection, mitigation and enhancement
measures of cultural resources.
• Cultural Resources Study
• Paleontological Resources Study
Recreation & Aesthetic Resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to conduct several studies in order to document baseline
conditions and help assess potential impacts on recreation and aesthetic resources from
construction and operation of the proposed Susitna-Watana Hydro Project.
• Recreation Resources Study
• Aesthetics Resources Study
• Recreation Boating/River Access Study
wildlife resources
The Alaska Energy Authority plans to study distribution, movements, population
size, productivity and habitat of wildlife in the Susitna River and surrounding area.
• Study of Distribution, Abundance, Productivity and Survival of Moose
• Study of Distribution, Abundance, Movements and Productivity of Caribou
• Study of Distribution, Abundance and Habitat Use of Dalls Sheep
• Study of Distribution, Abundance and Habitat Use by Large Carnivores
• Study of Distribution and Abundance of Wolverines
• Study of Terrestrial Furbearer Abundance and Habitat Use
• Study of Aquatic Furbearer Abundance and Habitat Use
• Study of Species Composition and Habitat Use of Small Mammals
• Study of Distribution and Habitat Use of Little Brown Bat
• Survey Study of Eagles and Other Raptors
• Waterbird Migration, Breeding and Habitat Study
• Breeding Survey Study of Landbirds and Shorebirds
• Study of Population Ecology of Willow Ptarmigan in Game Management
Unit 13, Southcentral Alaska
• Study of Distribution and Habitat Use of Wood Frogs
• Evaluation of Wildlife Habitat Use Study
• Wildlife Harvest Analysis Study
Susitna-Watana Hydro 10
The Alaska Energy Authority completed a successful field
study season in 2012 with the help of more than 100 field
workers. The data gathered from 18 individual studies
goes above and beyond the official Revised Study Plan
submitted to FERC in December.
The 2012 studies involved the following areas of focus:
AESTHETIC AND RECREATION RESOURCES
The study objectives for the 2012 Recreation and
Aesthetics Program focus on the identification,
collection, and synthesis of recreation and aesthetic
resource information that will inform the formal study
planning process. Information will also be used to guide
Project design and mitigation of construction, operation
and maintenance activities to minimize impacts.
Coordination across social resources (e.g., cultural,
subsistence, and socioeconomic) from the study’s outset
is an essential component of the program.
2012 AQUATIC HABITAT AND GEOMORPHIC
MAPPING OF THE MIDDLE RIVER USING
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Understanding the extent to which current (2012)
aquatic habitat and geomorphic features are similar to
or different from 1980s conditions will not only provide
information on the long-term equilibrium of the channel,
but will also help inform the extent to which other
datasets collected in the 1980s can be relied upon to
describe and supplement more recent aquatic habitat
and geomorphic data. Quantifying geomorphic features
and aquatic habitat types will also provide a basis for
selecting study sites, understanding flow versus habitat
relationships, and assessing geomorphic conditions.
2012 DOCUMENTATION OF SUSITNA RIVER ICE
BREAK-UP AND FORMATION
The purpose of this study is to document the timing and
progression of breakup and ice cover formation on the
Susitna River between RM 0 and RM 234 (Oshetna River
confluence). The study team will:
• Document open leads between RM 0 and RM 234
throughout the winter.
• Document the interaction between river ice
processes and channel morphology, vegetation, and
aquatic habitats.
• Provide baseline data to help identify the river
reaches most likely to experience changes in river
ice formation as a result of Project construction
and operation.
2012 RECONNAISSANCE-LEVEL GEOMORPHIC
AND AQUATIC HABITAT ASSESSMENT OF
PROJECT EFFECTS ON LOWER RIVER CHANNEL
The objective of this study is to assess at a
reconnaissance level the potential for the project to
affect aquatic habitat and channel morphology in the
Lower Susitna River.
2012FIELD STUDIES
Report to the Legislature 201211
2012 REVIEW OF EXISTING WATER
TEMPERATURE MODEL RESULTS AND DATA
COLLECTION
The objective of this Study is to provide a foundation
for the 2013-2014 water temperature modeling study
of reservoir and stream temperatures. The specific
objectives are as follows:
• Evaluate the 1980s water temperature model results
and determine the applicability of the past results to
the currently proposed project.
• Initiate collection of stream temperature and
meteorological data that will be needed for the 2013
and 2014 studies.
2012 RIVER FLOW ROUTING MODEL DATA
COLLECTION
The study objective for the 2012 field effort is to provide
input, calibration, and verification data for a river flow
routing model extending from the proposed dam site
to RM 75.
2012 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY PLAN
The cultural resources study objectives are designed
primarily to continue laying the foundation of information
to enable the applicant and lead federal agency to
meet the requirements of National Historic Preservation
Act (NHPA) and its accompanying regulations (36 CFR
800), and other pertinent federal and State laws and
regulations. The major objectives for 2012 work are
as follows:
• Create GIS database to help enable development
of predictive models and management of cultural
resources information for 2013-2014 studies.
• Develop predictive model, identifying areas of high,
medium and low potential for the occurrence of
cultural resources.
• Continue to identify and document cultural resources
within the project study area, building upon work done
between 1978-1985.
• Prepare plans and procedures addressing
unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources, human
remains and paleontological resources.
STUDYING FISH POPULATIONS, SALMON DISTRIBUTION
& HABITAT UTILIZATION
During 2012, AEA conducted studies to learn more about fish and adult salmon
in the Susitna River system. One of the studies aimed at consolidating and
synthesizing contemporary and historical fish-resource data within the study
area into a concise, comprehensive reference document and developing a
geospatially-referenced relational database.
AEA also began a multi-year effort with the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
to study the Susitna River, side channels and sloughs, to better understand the
distribution, abundance and spawning habitat of salmon. Key objectives of these
studies include:
• Capture, radio-tag and track adults from five species of Pacific salmon in the
middle Susitna River in proportion to their abundance.
• Determine the migration behavior and spawning locations of radio-tagged
fish in the Lower, Middle and Upper Susitna River.
• Assess the feasibility of using sonar to determine spawning locations in
turbid water.
• Locate individual holding and spawning salmon in clear and turbid water
and collect habitat data for instream flow modeling.
• Characterize salmon migration behavior and timing above Devils Canyon.
Susitna-Watana Hydro 12
The Alaska Energy Authority completed a successful field
study season in 2012 with the help of more than 100 field
workers. The data gathered from 18 individual studies
goes above and beyond the official Revised Study Plan
submitted to FERC in December.
The 2012 studies involved the following areas of focus:
AESTHETIC AND RECREATION RESOURCES
The study objectives for the 2012 Recreation and
Aesthetics Program focus on the identification,
collection, and synthesis of recreation and aesthetic
resource information that will inform the formal study
planning process. Information will also be used to guide
Project design and mitigation of construction, operation
and maintenance activities to minimize impacts.
Coordination across social resources (e.g., cultural,
subsistence, and socioeconomic) from the study’s outset
is an essential component of the program.
2012 AQUATIC HABITAT AND GEOMORPHIC
MAPPING OF THE MIDDLE RIVER USING
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Understanding the extent to which current (2012)
aquatic habitat and geomorphic features are similar to
or different from 1980s conditions will not only provide
information on the long-term equilibrium of the channel,
but will also help inform the extent to which other
datasets collected in the 1980s can be relied upon to
describe and supplement more recent aquatic habitat
and geomorphic data. Quantifying geomorphic features
and aquatic habitat types will also provide a basis for
selecting study sites, understanding flow versus habitat
relationships, and assessing geomorphic conditions.
2012 DOCUMENTATION OF SUSITNA RIVER ICE
BREAK-UP AND FORMATION
The purpose of this study is to document the timing and
progression of breakup and ice cover formation on the
Susitna River between RM 0 and RM 234 (Oshetna River
confluence). The study team will:
• Document open leads between RM 0 and RM 234
throughout the winter.
• Document the interaction between river ice
processes and channel morphology, vegetation, and
aquatic habitats.
• Provide baseline data to help identify the river
reaches most likely to experience changes in river
ice formation as a result of Project construction
and operation.
2012 RECONNAISSANCE-LEVEL GEOMORPHIC
AND AQUATIC HABITAT ASSESSMENT OF
PROJECT EFFECTS ON LOWER RIVER CHANNEL
The objective of this study is to assess at a
reconnaissance level the potential for the project to
affect aquatic habitat and channel morphology in the
Lower Susitna River.
2012FIELD STUDIES
Report to the Legislature 201211
2012 REVIEW OF EXISTING WATER
TEMPERATURE MODEL RESULTS AND DATA
COLLECTION
The objective of this Study is to provide a foundation
for the 2013-2014 water temperature modeling study
of reservoir and stream temperatures. The specific
objectives are as follows:
• Evaluate the 1980s water temperature model results
and determine the applicability of the past results to
the currently proposed project.
• Initiate collection of stream temperature and
meteorological data that will be needed for the 2013
and 2014 studies.
2012 RIVER FLOW ROUTING MODEL DATA
COLLECTION
The study objective for the 2012 field effort is to provide
input, calibration, and verification data for a river flow
routing model extending from the proposed dam site
to RM 75.
2012 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY PLAN
The cultural resources study objectives are designed
primarily to continue laying the foundation of information
to enable the applicant and lead federal agency to
meet the requirements of National Historic Preservation
Act (NHPA) and its accompanying regulations (36 CFR
800), and other pertinent federal and State laws and
regulations. The major objectives for 2012 work are
as follows:
• Create GIS database to help enable development
of predictive models and management of cultural
resources information for 2013-2014 studies.
• Develop predictive model, identifying areas of high,
medium and low potential for the occurrence of
cultural resources.
• Continue to identify and document cultural resources
within the project study area, building upon work done
between 1978-1985.
• Prepare plans and procedures addressing
unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources, human
remains and paleontological resources.
STUDYING FISH POPULATIONS, SALMON DISTRIBUTION
& HABITAT UTILIZATION
During 2012, AEA conducted studies to learn more about fish and adult salmon
in the Susitna River system. One of the studies aimed at consolidating and
synthesizing contemporary and historical fish-resource data within the study
area into a concise, comprehensive reference document and developing a
geospatially-referenced relational database.
AEA also began a multi-year effort with the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
to study the Susitna River, side channels and sloughs, to better understand the
distribution, abundance and spawning habitat of salmon. Key objectives of these
studies include:
• Capture, radio-tag and track adults from five species of Pacific salmon in the
middle Susitna River in proportion to their abundance.
• Determine the migration behavior and spawning locations of radio-tagged
fish in the Lower, Middle and Upper Susitna River.
• Assess the feasibility of using sonar to determine spawning locations in
turbid water.
• Locate individual holding and spawning salmon in clear and turbid water
and collect habitat data for instream flow modeling.
• Characterize salmon migration behavior and timing above Devils Canyon.
Susitna-Watana Hydro 12
invESTinG in REnEwABLEENERGY
Hydroelectric power is a long-term investment and Susitna-Watana
Hydro can be a vital piece of Alaska’s energy infrastructure.
Alaska remains dependent on volatile-priced fossil fuels for both
electricity and heat, resulting in a large degree of economic uncertainty. In
Alaska’s interior, utility costs are higher than any major U.S. metropolitan
center.1 Hydroelectric power reduces electric- price uncertainty and
provides long-term and stable power for many decades. In fact, Susitna-
Watana Hydro’s project life can stretch a century or beyond, reducing
Alaska’s Railbelt’s exposure to changing fossil fuel prices.
The cost of power from Susitna-Watana Hydro is anticipated to be
competitive with other fuel sources at start-up, even with no direct State
investment. The true, long-term benefits of the project become a reality
a little after a decade from construction when Susitna-Watana Hydro is
anticipated to become one of the most economic fuel sources, even
compared to natural gas.
Nick Szymoniak
Project Economist
OUR GOAL
Long-term, stable rates for Alaskans
Nick Szymoniak has experience in
economics with a strong background
in energy. Prior to joining the Alaska
Energy Authority, he served as a
research analyst for the Institute of
Social and Economic Research and gas
supply analyst with ENSTAR Natural
Gas. He also previously interned with
Northern Economics and the Alaska
Energy Authority.
Nick has lived in Alaska for 29 years and
received a bachelor’s in economics from
the University of Alaska Anchorage.
He is working on his master’s in
business administration from UAA.
He is the president of the Anchorage
Association for Energy Economics.0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
$0.40
Power Cost (Nominal $ per kWh)Susitna-Watana Hydro vs. Natural Gas Power Costs
1 The Council for Community and Economic Research surveyed 314
cities and found Fairbanks paid nearly double the national average.2024 20402032 2048202820442036 20522026204220342050203020462038 2054
Range of Natural Gas Power Costs
Base Case Natural Gas Power Costs
Susitna-Watana Power Cost
Hydro equals the price
of Base Case Natural
Gas after 12 years
Report to the Legislature 201213
The Alaska Energy Authority is committed to
providing accurate information, including project
cost and economics.
The current cost estimate, based on the 2,800,000
mwh annual energy production is $5.19 billion.
This estimate was produced by MWH, a global
leader in developing hydroelectric projects. AEA is
confident that this cost estimate, which accounts
for project cost risk, is accurate within 25 percent
of the final price.
In 2012, AEA initiated an independent cost
estimate from AECOM, a firm experienced in the
construction of hydroelectric projects in Arctic
climates. Their estimate came within nine percent
of the original estimate, an impressive statistic for
a project of this size. In addition, the independent
cost estimate provided valuable recommendations
to increase efficiencies and bolstered confidence
in the overall project cost estimate.
The finance plan is an important component
of developing a project of this scale. There are
multiple financing options for the State of Alaska
and the Alaska Energy Authority will be working
to bring on a financial consulting team in the near
future. At this time, AEA is estimating the project’s
power cost using the most conservative of financial
assumptions. AEA is assuming no State direct
investment, a five percent interest rate and a 30-
year debt term.
The chart below uses these assumptions and
describes the cost of power per kilowatt hour
(kWh), in wholesale rates:
pROjECT ECOnOMiCS
Bryan Carey
Engineering Manager
In addition to heading the engineering for Susitna-
Watana Hydro, Bryan Carey is also the project manager
for AEA’s Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project, currently
the largest hydro project in Alaska, and the Snettisham
Hydroelectric Project which is owned by the Alaska
Industrial Export Development Authority. He has more
than 25 years of engineering experience.
Bryan has been the project manager for various rural-
Alaska energy projects that include bulk fuel facilities,
power plants and small wind and hydroelectric projects.
Prior to AEA, he worked with several engineering
consulting companies, performing energy and
environmental work throughout the state.
POwEr COSTS ($/kWh)
Year 1 Rate ($2024)$0.181
Year 1 Rate ($2013 Real)$0.138
10-Year Avg Rate ($2013 Real)$0.124
25-Year Avg Rate ($2013 Real)$0.106
50-Year Avg Rate ($2013 Real)$0.061
Real = Adjusted for Inflation
• Assumes no direct state investment
Susitna-Watana Hydro 14
invESTinG in REnEwABLEENERGY
Hydroelectric power is a long-term investment and Susitna-Watana
Hydro can be a vital piece of Alaska’s energy infrastructure.
Alaska remains dependent on volatile-priced fossil fuels for both
electricity and heat, resulting in a large degree of economic uncertainty. In
Alaska’s interior, utility costs are higher than any major U.S. metropolitan
center.1 Hydroelectric power reduces electric- price uncertainty and
provides long-term and stable power for many decades. In fact, Susitna-
Watana Hydro’s project life can stretch a century or beyond, reducing
Alaska’s Railbelt’s exposure to changing fossil fuel prices.
The cost of power from Susitna-Watana Hydro is anticipated to be
competitive with other fuel sources at start-up, even with no direct State
investment. The true, long-term benefits of the project become a reality
a little after a decade from construction when Susitna-Watana Hydro is
anticipated to become one of the most economic fuel sources, even
compared to natural gas.
Nick Szymoniak
Project Economist
OUR GOAL
Long-term, stable rates for Alaskans
Nick Szymoniak has experience in
economics with a strong background
in energy. Prior to joining the Alaska
Energy Authority, he served as a
research analyst for the Institute of
Social and Economic Research and gas
supply analyst with ENSTAR Natural
Gas. He also previously interned with
Northern Economics and the Alaska
Energy Authority.
Nick has lived in Alaska for 29 years and
received a bachelor’s in economics from
the University of Alaska Anchorage.
He is working on his master’s in
business administration from UAA.
He is the president of the Anchorage
Association for Energy Economics.0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
$0.40
Power Cost (Nominal $ per kWh)Susitna-Watana Hydro vs. Natural Gas Power Costs
1 The Council for Community and Economic Research surveyed 314
cities and found Fairbanks paid nearly double the national average.2024 20402032 2048202820442036 20522026204220342050203020462038 2054
Range of Natural Gas Power Costs
Base Case Natural Gas Power Costs
Susitna-Watana Power Cost
Hydro equals the price
of Base Case Natural
Gas after 12 years
Report to the Legislature 201213
The Alaska Energy Authority is committed to
providing accurate information, including project
cost and economics.
The current cost estimate, based on the 2,800,000
mwh annual energy production is $5.19 billion.
This estimate was produced by MWH, a global
leader in developing hydroelectric projects. AEA is
confident that this cost estimate, which accounts
for project cost risk, is accurate within 25 percent
of the final price.
In 2012, AEA initiated an independent cost
estimate from AECOM, a firm experienced in the
construction of hydroelectric projects in Arctic
climates. Their estimate came within nine percent
of the original estimate, an impressive statistic for
a project of this size. In addition, the independent
cost estimate provided valuable recommendations
to increase efficiencies and bolstered confidence
in the overall project cost estimate.
The finance plan is an important component
of developing a project of this scale. There are
multiple financing options for the State of Alaska
and the Alaska Energy Authority will be working
to bring on a financial consulting team in the near
future. At this time, AEA is estimating the project’s
power cost using the most conservative of financial
assumptions. AEA is assuming no State direct
investment, a five percent interest rate and a 30-
year debt term.
The chart below uses these assumptions and
describes the cost of power per kilowatt hour
(kWh), in wholesale rates:
pROjECT ECOnOMiCS
Bryan Carey
Engineering Manager
In addition to heading the engineering for Susitna-
Watana Hydro, Bryan Carey is also the project manager
for AEA’s Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project, currently
the largest hydro project in Alaska, and the Snettisham
Hydroelectric Project which is owned by the Alaska
Industrial Export Development Authority. He has more
than 25 years of engineering experience.
Bryan has been the project manager for various rural-
Alaska energy projects that include bulk fuel facilities,
power plants and small wind and hydroelectric projects.
Prior to AEA, he worked with several engineering
consulting companies, performing energy and
environmental work throughout the state.
POwEr COSTS ($/kWh)
Year 1 Rate ($2024)$0.181
Year 1 Rate ($2013 Real)$0.138
10-Year Avg Rate ($2013 Real)$0.124
25-Year Avg Rate ($2013 Real)$0.106
50-Year Avg Rate ($2013 Real)$0.061
Real = Adjusted for Inflation
• Assumes no direct state investment
Susitna-Watana Hydro 14
HISTORY OF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydROOF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydRO
Report to the Legislature 201215
Highlights of the
Susitna Hydroelectric History
Project Completion2024
1980s
2009
2011
2012
2017
1950s
1970s
2008
2010
2012
2012 - 2015
2017
2015 - 2016
Drop
Drop
by
First studies to determine
Susitna river’s hydroelectric potential
conducted by U.S. Bureau of reclamation.
Studies from the 50s reviewed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Field work, biological studies, and activities to support
FErC license application happen through the late 70s.
Official Study Plan submitted to the
Federal Energy regulatory Comission (FErC)
AEA Authorized to
reevaluate Susitna
river potential
Field studies, public
involvement and
license application
Alaska State Energy Policy created
by Alaska State Legislature. This
moves Alaska toward 50% of power
from renewable energy resources
by 2025.
Oil prices decline in Alaska
causing a financial burden on the
State budget. APA withdraws
the FErC application despite
concluding that project impacts
were manageable.
Alaska Legislature
UNANIMOUSLY
approves funding to
pursue Susitna-watana
hydroelectric Project.
Studies begin on Susitna
river and surrounding areas
construction of Project begins
AEA reevaluates Susitna’s
hydroelectric potential
Licensing decision expected
Environmental Impact
Statement Preparation
and agency approvals
Wayne Dyok
Project Manager
OUR GOAL
Safe, efficient progress to obtain
a license to build
Wayne Dyok has more than 35 years of U.S.
and international experience in Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission licensing,
engineering design, environmental studies
and energy planning on hydroelectric
projects. He has managed major
hydroelectric licensing projects for the
California Department of Water Resources,
Seattle City Light and Dominion Generation.
Wayne has a master’s degree in civil
engineering and is a licensed civil engineer
in Alaska. He served as chief hydraulic
engineer and assistant manager for six years
on the Alaska Power Authority’s (now AEA)
Susitna hydroelectric project in the 1980s.
The Susitna River has long been considered for its hydropower
potential. Fed by the Susitna Glacier 2,500 feet up in the Alaska
Range, the river is 313 miles long, culminating at Cook Inlet. It is
ranked the 15th largest river in America, based on the volume of
water discharged at its mouth, by the U.S. Geological Survey.
Dozens of other rivers, creeks and tributaries empty into the Susitna
River. Among them are the Deshka, Yentna, Talkeetna and Chulitna
rivers. Watana Creek is a stream that runs into the Susitna River near
River Mile 190, about six miles upriver from the project site.
Different study efforts over nearly six decades have provided a
foundation of data that is helping to guide current plans. During
the next few years, the Alaska Energy Authority will gather the
necessary data to obtain a FERC license, potentially making
Susitna-Watana Hydro a reality.
HISTORY OF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydROOF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydRO
Susitna-Watana Hydro 16
HISTORY OF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydROOF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydRO
Report to the Legislature 201215
Highlights of the
Susitna Hydroelectric History
Project Completion2024
1980s
2009
2011
2012
2017
1950s
1970s
2008
2010
2012
2012 - 2015
2017
2015 - 2016
Drop
Drop
by
First studies to determine
Susitna river’s hydroelectric potential
conducted by U.S. Bureau of reclamation.
Studies from the 50s reviewed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Field work, biological studies, and activities to support
FErC license application happen through the late 70s.
Official Study Plan submitted to the
Federal Energy regulatory Comission (FErC)
AEA Authorized to
reevaluate Susitna
river potential
Field studies, public
involvement and
license application
Alaska State Energy Policy created
by Alaska State Legislature. This
moves Alaska toward 50% of power
from renewable energy resources
by 2025.
Oil prices decline in Alaska
causing a financial burden on the
State budget. APA withdraws
the FErC application despite
concluding that project impacts
were manageable.
Alaska Legislature
UNANIMOUSLY
approves funding to
pursue Susitna-watana
hydroelectric Project.
Studies begin on Susitna
river and surrounding areas
construction of Project begins
AEA reevaluates Susitna’s
hydroelectric potential
Licensing decision expected
Environmental Impact
Statement Preparation
and agency approvals
Wayne Dyok
Project Manager
OUR GOAL
Safe, efficient progress to obtain
a license to build
Wayne Dyok has more than 35 years of U.S.
and international experience in Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission licensing,
engineering design, environmental studies
and energy planning on hydroelectric
projects. He has managed major
hydroelectric licensing projects for the
California Department of Water Resources,
Seattle City Light and Dominion Generation.
Wayne has a master’s degree in civil
engineering and is a licensed civil engineer
in Alaska. He served as chief hydraulic
engineer and assistant manager for six years
on the Alaska Power Authority’s (now AEA)
Susitna hydroelectric project in the 1980s.
The Susitna River has long been considered for its hydropower
potential. Fed by the Susitna Glacier 2,500 feet up in the Alaska
Range, the river is 313 miles long, culminating at Cook Inlet. It is
ranked the 15th largest river in America, based on the volume of
water discharged at its mouth, by the U.S. Geological Survey.
Dozens of other rivers, creeks and tributaries empty into the Susitna
River. Among them are the Deshka, Yentna, Talkeetna and Chulitna
rivers. Watana Creek is a stream that runs into the Susitna River near
River Mile 190, about six miles upriver from the project site.
Different study efforts over nearly six decades have provided a
foundation of data that is helping to guide current plans. During
the next few years, the Alaska Energy Authority will gather the
necessary data to obtain a FERC license, potentially making
Susitna-Watana Hydro a reality.
HISTORY OF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydROOF SuSiTnA-wATA nA HydRO
Susitna-Watana Hydro 16
puBLiCOUTREACH
In March 2012, the Alaska State Legislature commissioned a
statewide poll to gauge public sentiment on a number of issues.
One question asked survey participants if they supported the
Susitna-Watana Hydro project. Overall, 53 percent said yes, 28
percent said no and 19 percent were unsure. Other research
indicated that many Alaskans simply did not know enough
about the project and, furthermore, that they wanted to learn
more about it.
The Alaska Energy Authority implemented the public outreach
campaign to help educate Alaskans about Susitna-Watana
Hydro. Highlights of the outreach effort for 2012 included a
new name, logo, website and collateral materials. Alaska
Energy Authority also launched a Facebook page in December
2012 to engage the public through social media.
Informational radio spots were aired in communities
throughout the Railbelt. AEA ensured that broadcasted spots
were educational and comprised of factual information.
The scope and estimated cost of Susitna-Watana Hydro make
it imperative that AEA continue to communicate accurate
information so that Alaskans can stay informed as the project
progresses.
Emily Ford
Public Outreach Liaison
OUR GOAL
Educate public about
Susitna-Watana Hydro
Emily Ford has more than 12 years of public
relations and government affairs experience,
with extensive involvement on energy issues.
She previously served as a government
relations staff member for the state’s largest
chamber of commerce and in the marketing
department of the Anchorage Daily News.
Emily has lived in Alaska for 34 years and holds
a bachelor’s degree in journalism and public
communications from the University of Alaska
Anchorage. She has participated in multiple
cross-cultural communications training courses
and is past president of the Public Relations
Society of America, Alaska Chapter.
Report to the Legislature 201217
Deborah Vo
Project Manager – Rural Energy
OUR GOAL
Open communication with stakeholders
Deborah Vo serves as the project manager for the Alaska
Energy Authority’s regional planning efforts for rural Alaska.
Prior to joining AEA, Deborah was the rural development
specialist for Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association,
where she oversaw economic development and training
projects for the company’s six Lower Yukon communities.
Previously, she was the executive director for the Alaska Inter-
Tribal Council and a planner for the Alaska Native Health Board.
Deborah’s extensive experience with Alaska Native regional
and village corporations, as well as tribal governments, is a
tremendous asset to the Susitna-Watana Hydro team. She will
assist in working with Alaska Native entities and working keep
local communities informed.
A lifelong Alaskan, Deborah received a bachelor’s degree
in Business from Elms College and a master’s in business
administration from Alaska Pacific University.
Susitna-Watana Hydro is a complex undertaking
that will require intense collaboration with dozens
of agencies and other stakeholders to succeed. The
Alaska Energy Authority has made a commitment
to manage the project in a way that engages
stakeholders and provides opportunities to
participate in the licensing process and other facets
of the endeavor.
Throughout the year, the Susitna-Watana Hydro team
participated in dozens of public meetings, speaking
engagements, technical workgroup sessions and
other forums to collaborate with and engage
stakeholders.
With a project of this type and scope, criticism and
opposition from some groups can be expected. The
Alaska Energy Authority is committed to listening
to concerns and providing accurate information
whenever possible.
In August 2012, the Alaska Energy Authority held
its board meeting in Talkeetna, a community that
has concerns and some opposition to the Project.
The board made this decision to demonstrate its
commitment to open dialogue and the sharing of
accurate information.
STAKEHOLDERENGAGEMENT
Susitna-Watana Hydro 1818
puBLiCOUTREACH
In March 2012, the Alaska State Legislature commissioned a
statewide poll to gauge public sentiment on a number of issues.
One question asked survey participants if they supported the
Susitna-Watana Hydro project. Overall, 53 percent said yes, 28
percent said no and 19 percent were unsure. Other research
indicated that many Alaskans simply did not know enough
about the project and, furthermore, that they wanted to learn
more about it.
The Alaska Energy Authority implemented the public outreach
campaign to help educate Alaskans about Susitna-Watana
Hydro. Highlights of the outreach effort for 2012 included a
new name, logo, website and collateral materials. Alaska
Energy Authority also launched a Facebook page in December
2012 to engage the public through social media.
Informational radio spots were aired in communities
throughout the Railbelt. AEA ensured that broadcasted spots
were educational and comprised of factual information.
The scope and estimated cost of Susitna-Watana Hydro make
it imperative that AEA continue to communicate accurate
information so that Alaskans can stay informed as the project
progresses.
Emily Ford
Public Outreach Liaison
OUR GOAL
Educate public about
Susitna-Watana Hydro
Emily Ford has more than 12 years of public
relations and government affairs experience,
with extensive involvement on energy issues.
She previously served as a government
relations staff member for the state’s largest
chamber of commerce and in the marketing
department of the Anchorage Daily News.
Emily has lived in Alaska for 34 years and holds
a bachelor’s degree in journalism and public
communications from the University of Alaska
Anchorage. She has participated in multiple
cross-cultural communications training courses
and is past president of the Public Relations
Society of America, Alaska Chapter.
Report to the Legislature 201217
Deborah Vo
Project Manager – Rural Energy
OUR GOAL
Open communication with stakeholders
Deborah Vo serves as the project manager for the Alaska
Energy Authority’s regional planning efforts for rural Alaska.
Prior to joining AEA, Deborah was the rural development
specialist for Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association,
where she oversaw economic development and training
projects for the company’s six Lower Yukon communities.
Previously, she was the executive director for the Alaska Inter-
Tribal Council and a planner for the Alaska Native Health Board.
Deborah’s extensive experience with Alaska Native regional
and village corporations, as well as tribal governments, is a
tremendous asset to the Susitna-Watana Hydro team. She will
assist in working with Alaska Native entities and working keep
local communities informed.
A lifelong Alaskan, Deborah received a bachelor’s degree
in Business from Elms College and a master’s in business
administration from Alaska Pacific University.
Susitna-Watana Hydro is a complex undertaking
that will require intense collaboration with dozens
of agencies and other stakeholders to succeed. The
Alaska Energy Authority has made a commitment
to manage the project in a way that engages
stakeholders and provides opportunities to
participate in the licensing process and other facets
of the endeavor.
Throughout the year, the Susitna-Watana Hydro team
participated in dozens of public meetings, speaking
engagements, technical workgroup sessions and
other forums to collaborate with and engage
stakeholders.
With a project of this type and scope, criticism and
opposition from some groups can be expected. The
Alaska Energy Authority is committed to listening
to concerns and providing accurate information
whenever possible.
In August 2012, the Alaska Energy Authority held
its board meeting in Talkeetna, a community that
has concerns and some opposition to the Project.
The board made this decision to demonstrate its
commitment to open dialogue and the sharing of
accurate information.
STAKEHOLDERENGAGEMENT
Susitna-Watana Hydro 1818
Susitna-watana hydro
Status report as of Dec. 31, 2012
Project Costs
FY2009-
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
(in thousands of dollars)Actual Actual To Date Encumbrance
Budgeted Amount &
Committed Funds Total
Site Determination &
Pre-Feasibility (Prior to
Pre-Application Document) 2,487.0 4,011.3 - - - 6,498.3
Personnel - 625.7 321.7 - 2,126.5 3,073.9
Licensing Costs: -
Engineering Feasibility Study - 1,244.2 3,451.0 3,946.4 1.0 8,642.6
Board of Consultants - - 30.1 145.0 224.8 399.9
Detailed Engineering Design - - - - 3,524.0 3,524.0
Utility Cooridor, Department of
Transportation Analysis - 450.8 88.7 53.8 125.0 718.3
FERC Licensing Support - 510.0 465.8 496.0 216.1 1,687.9
Office of Project Management
& Permitting - 165.7 265.4 2,173.6 1,306.0 3,910.7
Resource & Feasibility Studies - 4,915.7 5,593.6 9,019.7 11,135.3 30,664.3
Project Management Consultation - 533.3 76.6 159.1 31.0 800.0
Technical Assistance - 104.0 - 42.3 653.7 800.0
Permitting - 2.0 3.6 - 194.4 200.0
Logistical Support - 134.3 2,085.3 100.8 563.4 2,883.8
GIS - 199.2 178.2 372.8 56.7 806.9
Website and Public Info Library - 40.8 9.2 7.2 1,392.8 1,450.0
Communications - 9.5 64.2 87.4 546.9 708.0
Legal - 1,084.5 309.1 728.4 534.6 2,656.6
Travel - 29.1 24.7 - 18.9 72.7
Project Office - 106.4 50.0 - 311.3 467.7
Bureau of Land Management
Advances - 100.0 - - 100.0
Unallocated - - - - 5,934.4 5,934.4
-
Total Project Costs 2,487.0 14,166.5 13,117.2 17,332.5 28,896.8 76,000.0
Funding Sources FY2009 FY2011 FY2012 Total
Railbelt Energy Fund 1,528.1 65,700.0 67,228.1
General Fund 8,771.9 8,771.9
-
Total Funding Sources 1,528.1 8,771.9 65,700.0 76,000.0
ExPENDITURES
Report to the Legislature 201219
Susitna-watana hydro
Status report as of Dec. 31, 2012
Project Costs
FY2009-
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
(in thousands of dollars)Actual Actual To Date Encumbrance
Budgeted Amount &
Committed Funds Total
Site Determination &
Pre-Feasibility (Prior to
Pre-Application Document) 2,487.0 4,011.3 - - - 6,498.3
Personnel - 625.7 321.7 - 2,126.5 3,073.9
Licensing Costs: -
Engineering Feasibility Study - 1,244.2 3,451.0 3,946.4 1.0 8,642.6
Board of Consultants - - 30.1 145.0 224.8 399.9
Detailed Engineering Design - - - - 3,524.0 3,524.0
Utility Cooridor, Department of
Transportation Analysis - 450.8 88.7 53.8 125.0 718.3
FERC Licensing Support - 510.0 465.8 496.0 216.1 1,687.9
Office of Project Management
& Permitting - 165.7 265.4 2,173.6 1,306.0 3,910.7
Resource & Feasibility Studies - 4,915.7 5,593.6 9,019.7 11,135.3 30,664.3
Project Management Consultation - 533.3 76.6 159.1 31.0 800.0
Technical Assistance - 104.0 - 42.3 653.7 800.0
Permitting - 2.0 3.6 - 194.4 200.0
Logistical Support - 134.3 2,085.3 100.8 563.4 2,883.8
GIS - 199.2 178.2 372.8 56.7 806.9
Website and Public Info Library - 40.8 9.2 7.2 1,392.8 1,450.0
Communications - 9.5 64.2 87.4 546.9 708.0
Legal - 1,084.5 309.1 728.4 534.6 2,656.6
Travel - 29.1 24.7 - 18.9 72.7
Project Office - 106.4 50.0 - 311.3 467.7
Bureau of Land Management
Advances - 100.0 - - 100.0
Unallocated - - - - 5,934.4 5,934.4
-
Total Project Costs 2,487.0 14,166.5 13,117.2 17,332.5 28,896.8 76,000.0
Funding Sources FY2009 FY2011 FY2012 Total
Railbelt Energy Fund 1,528.1 65,700.0 67,228.1
General Fund 8,771.9 8,771.9
-
Total Funding Sources 1,528.1 8,771.9 65,700.0 76,000.0
PROJECT TEAM
wayne Dyok
project manager
wdyok@aidea.org
Bryan Carey
engineering manager
bcarey@aidea.org
Betsy McGregor
environmental manager
bmcgregor@aidea.org
Emily Ford
public outreach liaison
eford@aidea.org
Andy Morton
procurement manager
amorton@aidea.org
Justin Crowther
project technician
jcrowther@aidea.org
Sandie hayes
administrative assistant
shayes@aidea.org
Nick Syzmoniak
project economist
nsyzmoniak@aidea.org
Julia Bosma
licensing and permitting manager
jbosma@aidea.org
Deborah Vo
project manager – rural energy
dvo@aidea.org
ALASKA EnERGy AuTHORiTy BOARd OF diRECTORS
hugh Short, chairman
Commissioner Susan Bell, vice chair
Commissioner Bryan Butcher, member
ron Arvin, public member
wilson hughes, public member
robert Sheldon, public member
Gary Wilken, public member
STAFF
Sara Fisher-Goad
executive director
Alaska Energy Authority
pROjECT TEAM
Susitna-Watana Hydro 20
Susitna-watana hydro
Status report as of Dec. 31, 2012
Project Costs
FY2009-
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
(in thousands of dollars)Actual Actual To Date Encumbrance
Budgeted Amount &
Committed Funds Total
Site Determination &
Pre-Feasibility (Prior to
Pre-Application Document) 2,487.0 4,011.3 - - - 6,498.3
Personnel - 625.7 321.7 - 2,126.5 3,073.9
Licensing Costs: -
Engineering Feasibility Study - 1,244.2 3,451.0 3,946.4 1.0 8,642.6
Board of Consultants - - 30.1 145.0 224.8 399.9
Detailed Engineering Design - - - - 3,524.0 3,524.0
Utility Cooridor, Department of
Transportation Analysis - 450.8 88.7 53.8 125.0 718.3
FERC Licensing Support - 510.0 465.8 496.0 216.1 1,687.9
Office of Project Management
& Permitting - 165.7 265.4 2,173.6 1,306.0 3,910.7
Resource & Feasibility Studies - 4,915.7 5,593.6 9,019.7 11,135.3 30,664.3
Project Management Consultation - 533.3 76.6 159.1 31.0 800.0
Technical Assistance - 104.0 - 42.3 653.7 800.0
Permitting - 2.0 3.6 - 194.4 200.0
Logistical Support - 134.3 2,085.3 100.8 563.4 2,883.8
GIS - 199.2 178.2 372.8 56.7 806.9
Website and Public Info Library - 40.8 9.2 7.2 1,392.8 1,450.0
Communications - 9.5 64.2 87.4 546.9 708.0
Legal - 1,084.5 309.1 728.4 534.6 2,656.6
Travel - 29.1 24.7 - 18.9 72.7
Project Office - 106.4 50.0 - 311.3 467.7
Bureau of Land Management
Advances - 100.0 - - 100.0
Unallocated - - - - 5,934.4 5,934.4
-
Total Project Costs 2,487.0 14,166.5 13,117.2 17,332.5 28,896.8 76,000.0
Funding Sources FY2009 FY2011 FY2012 Total
Railbelt Energy Fund 1,528.1 65,700.0 67,228.1
General Fund 8,771.9 8,771.9
-
Total Funding Sources 1,528.1 8,771.9 65,700.0 76,000.0
ExPENDITURES
Report to the Legislature 201219
Susitna-watana hydro
Status report as of Dec. 31, 2012
Project Costs
FY2009-
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
(in thousands of dollars)Actual Actual To Date Encumbrance
Budgeted Amount &
Committed Funds Total
Site Determination &
Pre-Feasibility (Prior to
Pre-Application Document) 2,487.0 4,011.3 - - - 6,498.3
Personnel - 625.7 321.7 - 2,126.5 3,073.9
Licensing Costs: -
Engineering Feasibility Study - 1,244.2 3,451.0 3,946.4 1.0 8,642.6
Board of Consultants - - 30.1 145.0 224.8 399.9
Detailed Engineering Design - - - - 3,524.0 3,524.0
Utility Cooridor, Department of
Transportation Analysis - 450.8 88.7 53.8 125.0 718.3
FERC Licensing Support - 510.0 465.8 496.0 216.1 1,687.9
Office of Project Management
& Permitting - 165.7 265.4 2,173.6 1,306.0 3,910.7
Resource & Feasibility Studies - 4,915.7 5,593.6 9,019.7 11,135.3 30,664.3
Project Management Consultation - 533.3 76.6 159.1 31.0 800.0
Technical Assistance - 104.0 - 42.3 653.7 800.0
Permitting - 2.0 3.6 - 194.4 200.0
Logistical Support - 134.3 2,085.3 100.8 563.4 2,883.8
GIS - 199.2 178.2 372.8 56.7 806.9
Website and Public Info Library - 40.8 9.2 7.2 1,392.8 1,450.0
Communications - 9.5 64.2 87.4 546.9 708.0
Legal - 1,084.5 309.1 728.4 534.6 2,656.6
Travel - 29.1 24.7 - 18.9 72.7
Project Office - 106.4 50.0 - 311.3 467.7
Bureau of Land Management
Advances - 100.0 - - 100.0
Unallocated - - - - 5,934.4 5,934.4
-
Total Project Costs 2,487.0 14,166.5 13,117.2 17,332.5 28,896.8 76,000.0
Funding Sources FY2009 FY2011 FY2012 Total
Railbelt Energy Fund 1,528.1 65,700.0 67,228.1
General Fund 8,771.9 8,771.9
-
Total Funding Sources 1,528.1 8,771.9 65,700.0 76,000.0
PROJECT TEAM
wayne Dyok
project manager
wdyok@aidea.org
Bryan Carey
engineering manager
bcarey@aidea.org
Betsy McGregor
environmental manager
bmcgregor@aidea.org
Emily Ford
public outreach liaison
eford@aidea.org
Andy Morton
procurement manager
amorton@aidea.org
Justin Crowther
project technician
jcrowther@aidea.org
Sandie hayes
administrative assistant
shayes@aidea.org
Nick Syzmoniak
project economist
nsyzmoniak@aidea.org
Julia Bosma
licensing and permitting manager
jbosma@aidea.org
Deborah Vo
project manager – rural energy
dvo@aidea.org
ALASKA EnERGy AuTHORiTy BOARd OF diRECTORS
hugh Short, chairman
Commissioner Susan Bell, vice chair
Commissioner Bryan Butcher, member
ron Arvin, public member
wilson hughes, public member
robert Sheldon, public member
Gary Wilken, public member
STAFF
Sara Fisher-Goad
executive director
Alaska Energy Authority
pROjECT TEAM
Susitna-Watana Hydro 20
Susitna-Watana Hydro is just one project the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) is working on to diversify Alaska’s energy
portfolio. In 2008, the State created the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) with the intent to appropriate $50 million
annually for five years. This legislation placed Alaska in the forefront of most states in the country in funding for
renewable energy.
The Legislature authorized AEA to manage the REF project application process, project evaluations, recommendations,
completion of grant agreements and disbursement of funds to grantees. In 2012, the Renewable Energy Fund was
authorized for another 10 years, providing an additional $50 million for renewable energy projects statewide. Eligible
technologies include wind, geothermal, hydrothermal, certain types of biomass, biogas, wave, tidal, waste heat
utilization, river in-stream power, hydropower and solar.
Renewable Energy Fund achievements to date:
AEA REnEwABLE EnERGySTRATEGY
In 2010, Alaska adopted
one of the most ambitious
renewable energy goals in
the U.S.: 50% of power from
renewable resources by 2025.
• 558 applications received since introduction
• 227 projects funded
• 183 grants in place
• $202.5 million appropriated since introduction
• $45 million in annual fuel savings by 2016 from
Alaska’s renewable energy projects
TODAY:
70%
Coal9%
Wind,
S
o
l
a
r
,
B
i
o
m
a
s
s
0.1%
Oil & Gas
H Y D R O
BY 2025:
50%
Oil & Gas & Coal
Renewable
50%21 %
BY 2025:
TODAY:
70%
Coal9%
Wind,
S
o
l
a
r
,
B
i
o
m
a
s
s
0.1%
Oil & Gas
H Y D R O
BY 2025:
50%
Oil & Gas & Coal
Renewable
50%21 %
TODAY:
Report to the Legislature 201221
In an effort to reduce the cost of energy in Alaska, AEA is also
encouraging innovation through the Emerging Energy Technology
Fund which was created through the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act
(Senate Bill 220). Together with a matching grant from the Denali
Commission, $8.9 million was made available for the development
of emerging energy technologies in Alaska that can be brought to
commercialization with in five years.
In November, sixteen projects were selected to receive grants through
the fund. Among the projects are initiatives to increase efficiency for
diesel generators, develop hydrokinetic resources, enhance wind
power and storage capabilities and explore a small community, self-
regulating power grid.
Alaska faces some of the highest energy costs in the nation. These
initiatives continue to put Alaska at the forefront of finding innovative
solutions and new energy technologies, while helping to create a
vibrant energy sector.
Sara Fisher-Goad,
Executive Director,
Alaska Energy Authority
OUR GOAL
Diversifying Alaska’s energy portfolio
Sara Fisher-Goad is executive director of the
Alaska Energy Authority, a position to which
she was appointed in February 2011. She
has been with AEA since November 2000,
serving as the deputy director-operations.
Prior to joining AEA, Sara worked for a
Minnesota financial advisory firm, structuring
bond issues for municipal clients. She
received a bachelor’s degree in mathematics
from University of Alaska Fairbanks and a
master’s in business administration from
University of Alaska Anchorage.
EMERGinG EnERGy
TECHnOLOGy Fund
Susitna-Watana Hydro 22
Susitna-Watana Hydro is just one project the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) is working on to diversify Alaska’s energy
portfolio. In 2008, the State created the Renewable Energy Fund (REF) with the intent to appropriate $50 million
annually for five years. This legislation placed Alaska in the forefront of most states in the country in funding for
renewable energy.
The Legislature authorized AEA to manage the REF project application process, project evaluations, recommendations,
completion of grant agreements and disbursement of funds to grantees. In 2012, the Renewable Energy Fund was
authorized for another 10 years, providing an additional $50 million for renewable energy projects statewide. Eligible
technologies include wind, geothermal, hydrothermal, certain types of biomass, biogas, wave, tidal, waste heat
utilization, river in-stream power, hydropower and solar.
Renewable Energy Fund achievements to date:
AEA REnEwABLE EnERGySTRATEGY
In 2010, Alaska adopted
one of the most ambitious
renewable energy goals in
the U.S.: 50% of power from
renewable resources by 2025.
• 558 applications received since introduction
• 227 projects funded
• 183 grants in place
• $202.5 million appropriated since introduction
• $45 million in annual fuel savings by 2016 from
Alaska’s renewable energy projects
TODAY:
70%
Coal9%
Wind,
S
o
l
a
r
,
B
i
o
m
a
s
s
0.1%
Oil & Gas
H Y D R O
BY 2025:
50%
Oil & Gas & Coal
Renewable
50%21 %
BY 2025:
TODAY:
70%
Coal9%
Wind,
S
o
l
a
r
,
B
i
o
m
a
s
s
0.1%
Oil & Gas
H Y D R O
BY 2025:
50%
Oil & Gas & Coal
Renewable
50%21 %
TODAY:
Report to the Legislature 201221
In an effort to reduce the cost of energy in Alaska, AEA is also
encouraging innovation through the Emerging Energy Technology
Fund which was created through the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act
(Senate Bill 220). Together with a matching grant from the Denali
Commission, $8.9 million was made available for the development
of emerging energy technologies in Alaska that can be brought to
commercialization with in five years.
In November, sixteen projects were selected to receive grants through
the fund. Among the projects are initiatives to increase efficiency for
diesel generators, develop hydrokinetic resources, enhance wind
power and storage capabilities and explore a small community, self-
regulating power grid.
Alaska faces some of the highest energy costs in the nation. These
initiatives continue to put Alaska at the forefront of finding innovative
solutions and new energy technologies, while helping to create a
vibrant energy sector.
Sara Fisher-Goad,
Executive Director,
Alaska Energy Authority
OUR GOAL
Diversifying Alaska’s energy portfolio
Sara Fisher-Goad is executive director of the
Alaska Energy Authority, a position to which
she was appointed in February 2011. She
has been with AEA since November 2000,
serving as the deputy director-operations.
Prior to joining AEA, Sara worked for a
Minnesota financial advisory firm, structuring
bond issues for municipal clients. She
received a bachelor’s degree in mathematics
from University of Alaska Fairbanks and a
master’s in business administration from
University of Alaska Anchorage.
EMERGinG EnERGy
TECHnOLOGy Fund
Susitna-Watana Hydro 22
Report to the Legislature 201223