HomeMy WebLinkAboutSuWa200sec12-6Alaska Resources Library & Information Services
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document
ARLIS Uniform Cover Page
Title:
Aesthetic resources study, Study plan Section 12.6 : Final study plan
SuWa 200
Author(s) – Personal:
Author(s) – Corporate:
Alaska Energy Authority
AEA-identified category, if specified:
Final study plan
AEA-identified series, if specified:
Series (ARLIS-assigned report number):
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project document number 200
Existing numbers on document:
Published by:
[Anchorage : Alaska Energy Authority, 2013]
Date published:
July 2013
Published for:
Date or date range of report:
Volume and/or Part numbers:
Study plan Section 12.6
Final or Draft status, as indicated:
Document type:
Pagination:
19 p.
Related work(s):
Pages added/changed by ARLIS:
Notes:
All reports in the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document series include an ARLIS-
produced cover page and an ARLIS-assigned number for uniformity and citability. All reports
are posted online at http://www.arlis.org/resources/susitna-watana/
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project
(FERC No. 14241)
Aesthetic Resources Study
Study Plan Section 12.6
Final Study Plan
Alaska Energy Authority
July 2013
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-1 July 2013
12.6. Aesthetic Resources Study
On December 14, 2012, Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) filed with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) its Revised Study Plan (RSP), which included
58 individual study plans (AEA 2012). Included within the RSP was the Aesthetic Resources
Study, Section 12.6. RSP Section 12.6 focuses on inventorying and documenting baseline
aesthetic conditions within the Aesthetic Resources Study Area and evaluating the potential
effects to aesthetic resources that may result from construction and operation of the proposed
Project. RSP 12.6 provided goals, objectives, and proposed methods for aesthetic resources data
collection and analysis.
On February 1, 2013, FERC staff issued its study determination (February 1 SPD) for 44 of the
58 studies, approving 31 studies as filed and 13 with modifications. RSP Section 12.6 was one of
the 13 approved with modifications. In its February 1 SPD, FERC recommended the following:
We recommend that AEA modify the Aesthetic Resources Study Plan as follows:
• Conduct surveys of ambient sound levels in all four seasons.
• Include in the initial study report any proposed modifications to the study plan based on
the first year’s data on the lower river uses, hydrology, and ice processes.
In accordance with the February 1 SPD, AEA addressed the recommended modifications in the
Final Study Plan for Section 12.6. These modifications are also included in the methods below.
12.6.1. General Description of the Proposed Study
The goals and objectives for the Aesthetic Resources Study are to inventory and document
baseline aesthetic (e.g., visual, auditory) conditions within the Aesthetic Resources Study Area
and evaluate the potential effects to aesthetic resources that may result from construction and
operation of the proposed Project. The analysis will focus on assessing these potential impacts
and will help identify potential design and other mitigation options.
12.6.2. Existing Information and Need for Additional Information
Existing information on aesthetic resources is provided in BLM Anchorage District planning
documents, and in AEA's PAD (AEA 2011b). The Aesthetic Resources Study Area is located
within the planning area boundary of the BLM Anchorage District. Although the Study Area is
located within the lands managed under the East Alaska Resource Management Plan (RMP), the
southwestern portion of the Study Area includes lands administered by the Ring of Fire RMP. As
part of the RMP development process, the Bureau of Land Management completed a visual
resource inventory (VRI) of BLM-administered lands within the Study Area. The VRI data
consist of 3 components: scenic quality, visual sensitivity, and visual distance zone data. This
information can be used to understand existing visual (aesthetic) resources at a planning level,
and refine where necessary to better convey project-level information.
The PAD includes aesthetics resource data collected during the 1985 Susitna Hydroelectric
Project Application for License for Major Project (APA 1985). These data included a description
of landscape character within portions of the Study Area, a ranking of aesthetic value and visual
absorption capability, and identification of notable landscape features. As part of the 2012 work,
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-2 July 2013
each component, described below, was assessed to determine its completeness and applicability
to the proposed Project. An aesthetic resources study was initiated in 2012 to gather data to
inform the 2013-2014 study plan. As part of this effort, data collected during the 1985 Susitna
Hydroelectric Project Application for License for Major Project (APA 1985) was field verified.
The nexus between each landscape character type and the proposed project was re-assessed to
help inform the selection of Key Observation Points (KOPs) and indicators to be used in the
impact analysis.
Additional elements of the 2012 aesthetic resources study included the following:
• Review of relevant federal, state, and local land use planning documents
• Viewshed modeling of the existing Susitna River, from approximately 5 miles downriver
of the proposed dam site to approximately 5 miles upriver of the inundation zone
• Viewshed modeling of the proposed reservoir
• Field reconnaissance, including an assessment of existing cultural modification, lighting,
and soundscapes
• Collection of photography
• Planning for the soundscape analysis
• Initiation of interdisciplinary coordination
In order to analyze potential impacts from the proposed Project (beneficial or adverse),
additional baseline data is required. Collection of these data will focus on establishing the type
and distribution of scenic quality attributes present within the Study Area, visual sensitivity to
change within the Aesthetic Resources Study Area (assessed throughout a larger geographic
area), and existing visual distance zones within the Study Area. These data will be used to
support the impact analysis, including direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to aesthetic
resources.
Using information obtained from existing data, the 2012 aesthetic resources study, the FERC
scoping process and incorporation of Agency and licensing participant recommendations,
indicators proposed for the impact analysis were identified and study methods for 2013-2014
were developed.
12.6.3. Study Area
The Aesthetic Resources Study Area is shown in Figure 12.6-1. It is designed to be sufficient in
size to address likely established indicators of change, including potential direct and indirect
effects to recreation, cultural resources, subsistence, socioeconomics, geomorphology/ice
processes, and riparian vegetation.
The Aesthetic Resources Study Area will be divided into primary and secondary study areas. The
primary study area will be defined by a 30-mile radius surrounding all Project components,
including: the proposed dam and camp facilities including construction sites, the reservoir,
transmission corridors, access road corridors, borrow sites, and rail sidings. The Project
viewshed will be defined in Q1 2013 using the most current Project design information. The
analysis will focus on the following broadly defined viewer areas:
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-3 July 2013
• The Susitna River corridor, downstream of Devils Canyon to Talkeetna
• The Susitna River corridor, from Devils Canyon to the proposed dam site
• The Susitna River, upstream of the proposed dam site to the upriver extent of the
inundation zone
• Upland areas adjacent to the Susitna River, with emphasis on those areas within the
viewshed of the inundation zone, proposed access roads, and proposed transmission
corridors
• Common air transportation routes used for transportation and recreational air tours
The secondary study area for this study will include all lands located between the Denali
Highway, south to the Glenn Highway and from the Richardson Highway, east to the mouth of
the Susitna River (Figure 12.6.2). This area will be evaluated using existing information and
used to understand the distribution of on aesthetic resources within a larger geographic context.
The aesthetics resource study area could be adjusted in 2014 to include areas within the river
corridor located downriver of Talkeetna if 2013 studies in the lower reach indicate a possible
Project-related effect on aesthetic resources in this area. Any recommended changes to any study
areas will be included in AEA’s Initial Study Report, which will be prepared and distributed in
early February 2014. Such recommendation will be based on an assessment of modeling
completed as part of the hydrology and ice processes analyses, including potential changes in the
hydrologic regime, such as water timing, quantity, and quality (Section 7.0), and the expected
change in the type, distribution, and seasonality of ice cover on the Susitna River, downriver of
the proposed dam (4Q 2013). The Initial Study Report in early 2014 will include any proposed
modifications to the study plan based on the first year of data collected on the lower river uses,
hydrology, and ice processes.
12.6.4. Study Methods
The visual resource impact analysis will generally follow methods developed by the BLM (BLM
1986). This methodology will be used to gather baseline data, complete the impact analysis, and
inform design and mitigation options. Baseline data collection will occur across the primary and
secondary study area. The primary study area will be evaluated using a combination of desktop
and field-based observations. The secondary study area will be evaluated using desktop analyses
and existing information. Data collection and analysis will be completed across all four seasons.
Components of the study include:
• Viewshed Modeling
• Interdisciplinary Coordination
• Identification of Analysis Locations
• Baseline Data Collection
• Impact Analysis (Photosimulations, Contrast Rating, Visual Resource Inventory
Analysis)
• Identification of Design and Other Mitigation Options
Viewshed Modeling
Viewshed models will be generated for all Project features, including the proposed reservoir,
roads and transmission lines. Viewshed models will be developed for pre-and post-Project
conditions of the inundation zone of the Susitna River to depict expected changes in viewshed
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-4 July 2013
areas (i.e., creation of new views, loss of others). Additional viewsheds will be created from
identified analysis locations, described below. Maps displaying the viewsheds will be created,
and used to direct the identification of important views and vistas considered in the analysis.
Identification of Analysis Locations
Standard analysis locations will be established that represent: (1) common and/or sensitive views
within the Aesthetic Resources Study Area, and (2) areas used to measure anticipated change in
scenic quality, and/or new opportunities for views, based on potential configuration of access
roads/transmission corridors. These locations, referred to as Key Observation Pints (KOPs), will
be used to evaluate baseline aesthetic values (including visual resources and soundscape), and
will be carried forward through the impact analysis. Analysis locations will differ by landscape
analysis factors (i.e., distance from the Project, predominant angle of observation, dominant use),
and may be applicable to one or more seasons.
KOPs will be categorized as follows:
• Observation Points (OPs): Observation Points represent specific locations or viewpoints.
The viewer experience at these locations is typically stationary and from a single vantage
point. Views experienced from OPs may be directional (i.e., a focal view) or not (i.e., a
360 degree panoramic).
• Observation Areas (OAs): Observation Areas represent large geographic areas where
views could be experienced from a variety of locations. Views are typically transient, and
experienced by viewers moving through the area (i.e., dispersed recreation; subsistence).
The likelihood of viewers standing in the same spot during repeated visits is low. The
degree of variability of views experienced from OAs will depend on a variety of
landscape characteristics.
• Observation Corridors (OCs): Observation Corridors, also called “linear KOPs”,
represent linear viewing experiences, in which scenic attributes are experienced as a
continuum. They may be focal (i.e., leading toward a noteworthy natural feature; entrance
way), and/or transient (i.e., passing through a landscape).
• Landscape Character Points (LCPs): Landscape Character Points will be established to
provide standardized locations in which to evaluate changes in scenic quality. These
locations are not tied to a particular viewer experience; however, they will provide
information regarding the change in the visual resource of the area (beneficial or adverse)
that may result from the proposed Project.
Preliminary recommendations for analysis locations are described in Table 12.6-1. Each location
is targeted to address potential impacts (beneficial or adverse) to aesthetic resources, and is based
largely on the anticipated nexus between the proposed Project and aesthetic resources identified
in 2012. Locations used to assess new access to views / viewer experience that may result from
access roads and/or transmission corridors will be selected through review of topographic maps
and viewshed modeling. Final draft target analysis locations will be selected and mapped. Input
from agencies on analysis locations will be sought through a TWG meeting in 2013, and will be
considered when establishing final analysis locations.
Baseline Data Collection
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-5 July 2013
Baseline data collection will include a combination of desktop (primary and secondary study
area) and field data collection (primary study area).
Desktop data collection will include existing spatial and geospatial data describing aesthetic
attributes, including scenic quality, visual distance zones, and visual sensitivity of the primary
and secondary study areas.
Field data collection will be implemented using methodology developed by the BLM (BLM
1986). Data collection will target analysis locations sited within the primary study area. Data
collection and analysis will focus on identifying existing aesthetic resource values including
scenic quality, visual sensitivity, and distance zones.
Data on scenic quality will include the basic landscape components of form, line, color and
texture, carried forward through the contrast rating procedure (BLM 1986) used in the impact
analysis.
Visual sensitivity will be assessed through: (1) review of existing data collected during the
Visual Sensitivity Level Analysis (SLA) completed during the RMP planning process for the
BLM Ring of Fire and East Alaska RMP, and (2) Project-specific analysis. BLM planning-level
data will include spatial data defining Sensitivity Level Rating Units (SLRUs), and the
associated sensitivity-level analysis completed for that unit.
The Project-specific visual sensitivity analysis will be completed through intercept surveys, mail
surveys, and executive interviews completed in coordination with recreation resources,
socioeconomics, and subsistence resources. Survey instruments will be finalized during Q12013
study year. Focus groups will be held in 2014 to address visual preference of each alternative.
Simulations created from KOPs under each alternative will be used to collect input on aesthetic
attributes of each. A total of three focus groups will be held, targeting: (1) public agencies, (2)
local tour operators/outfitters and guides/lodge owners, and (3) Alaska Native populations.
Visual distance zones represent the distance from which the landscape is most commonly
viewed. These zones are established by buffering common travel routes and viewer locations at
distances of three miles, five miles, and 15 miles using GIS (BLM 1986). Existing visual
distance zones completed during the RMP planning process for the BLM Ring of Fire and East
Alaska RMP will be used to describe baseline characteristics. Project-level visual distance zones
will be developed based on an understanding of local travel routes, including those used for
recreation and tourism (i.e., the Susitna River corridor below Devils Canyon; flightseeing tours).
One goal of the Aesthetic Resources Study will be help identify potential design and mitigation
options to address potential impacts to aesthetic resources. A preliminary assessment of expected
visual contrast of all Project components will be completed. This information will allow AEA to
identify the mechanism of change in visual resources that may result from construction and
operation of the Project and assist in identifying design features or other potential mitigation
measures that could be implemented to reduce impacts.
Photo simulations
To support the visual resource effects analysis and to illustrate expected visibility of Project
components from various locations, photo simulations will be prepared for a subset of analysis
locations. Simulations will be produced by rendering Project components (dam structure,
reservoir, access roads, transmission corridors) with 3-dimensional (3-D) computer models and
superimposing these images onto photographs taken from analysis locations. Simulations will be
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-6 July 2013
produced to illustrate (1) the dam structure, (2) reservoir landscape characteristics, (3) access
roads and transmission lines, (4) views of reservoir from upland areas, and (5) views of potential
construction-related impacts. Simulations will be completed for all seasons and under daylight
and nighttime/darkness conditions. An estimated total of 30 visual simulations will be produced.
All images will be available for other Project uses.
Analysis
The aesthetics analysis will focus on identifying potential changes to aesthetic resources that
may result from the proposed Project. The analysis will include a disclosure of anticipated
effects, and a description of new aesthetic attributes (i.e., access; viewer experience). The
analysis will address the following indicators of change:
• the mechanism of change in to aesthetic resources, measured by the degree of visual
contrast in form, line, color, and texture created by construction and operation of the
proposed Project;
• change in existing scenic quality, visual sensitivity, and distance zones within the
Aesthetic Resources Study Area due to construction and operation of the proposed
Project – change may result from inundation of the river channel, operation of the
reservoir, introduction of new access roads and transmission lines (informed by siting and
design), and/or alteration of downstream flow regime (including potential effects to
geomorphology, ice processes, water quality, riparian vegetation, river flow regime, and
access/recreation);
• change in viewshed of and from the Susitna River due to inundation of the river channel
and creation of the reservoir;
• change in access to views, due to the presence of the reservoir, access roads, and
transmission corridor(s), and potentially improved navigability through Devils Canyon;
• change in mechanism of view (i.e., transition from mobile view traveling downriver, to
static view when situated on the reservoir);
• change in visibility that may result from Project-related dust; and
• effect on dark sky due to light and glare.
Methodology used to address each indicator is described below:
• Contrast Rating Analysis - The BLM Contrast Rating procedure will be used to
determine visual contrast that may result from the construction and operation of the
Project using photo simulations depicting Project features. This method assumes that the
extent to which the proposed Project affects visual resources is a function of the visual
contrast between the proposed Project and the existing landscape character. Impact
determinations will be based on the identified level of contrast and are not a measure of
the overall attractiveness of the Project (BLM 1986). At each analysis location, Project
features will be evaluated using photo simulations and described using the same basic
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-7 July 2013
elements of form, line, color, and texture used during the baseline evaluation. The level
of perceived contrast between the proposed Project and the existing landscape will be
classified using the following definitions:
- None: The element contrast is not visible or perceived.
- Weak: The element contrast can be seen but does not attract attention.
- Moderate: The element contrast begins to attract attention and begins to dominate
the characteristic landscape.
- Strong: The element contrast demands attention, would not be overlooked, and is
dominant in the landscape.
The level of contrast will be assessed for all Project components used during
construction, operations and maintenance, and decommissioning of the proposed Project.
• Visual Resource Inventory Analysis: The VRI analysis will be used to identify expected
change to scenic quality, visual sensitivity, and/or distance zones that may result from
operation of the proposed Project. Impacts will be evaluated by ranking each factor used
to classify scenic quality, visual sensitivity, and distance zones under operational
conditions, and comparing those values to baseline conditions.
• Light and Glare: The impact analysis for light and glare will focus on potential change
that may result from nighttime artificial lighting and/or daytime glare. The analysis of
artificial lighting will identify sources, intensity and spatial extent of anticipated impacts.
Photo simulations will be produced to demonstrate views of the proposed Project under
dark conditions from select analysis locations.
• Change in Viewshed Area and Mechanism of View: Viewshed analysis performed for
both pre- and post-Project conditions will be compared to identify the changes in
viewshed and mechanism of view. These data will quantify the extent of changes in
views, and the degree to which access to views changes with the development of roads
and the elevation of the viewer within the inundated portions of the reservoir.
• Change in Visibility: Data generated by the Air Quality Resource discipline will be used
to determine the potential for changes in visibility that may result from construction
and/or operation of the proposed Project and related recreation resource values. Should it
be determined that changes in air quality would be detectable, additional visibility
analyses will be performed.
Soundscape Analysis
A systematic sound study will be conducted to characterize the existing ambient sound
environment in the vicinity of the proposed Project and estimate the potential effect of Project
construction and operational activities on that environment. The analysis will focus on:
• Quantifying existing soundscape data
• Determining consistency of existing soundscape with management objectives pertaining
to sound (i.e., ROS data)
• Identifying anticipated changes in soundscape based on construction and operation
phases of the Project (predictive sound emission modeling)
• Determining expected post-Project conformance with existing ROS designations
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-8 July 2013
The analysis will include an assessment of Project-induced effects based on the assessment of
future recreation use and demand and Project-related opportunities (Section 12.5.4).
The steps in the sound analysis are described below.
Review Documentation and Develop Data Needs
Relevant Project data will be reviewed, including the most current Project description, operating
and construction equipment inventories, and construction schedules. Existing ambient sound data
recorded within the secondary study area will be obtained. Based upon this review, itemized data
requirements will be developed that will be needed to perform predictive sound emission
modeling. A seasonal set of outdoor ambient sound level surveys in the vicinity of the Project
Area will be obtained (one survey for each of the four seasons will be collected). The data
requirements will include anticipated categories of stationary and mobile construction equipment
and their frequency of operation, locations of nearest representative noise-sensitive receivers
(NSR), recreation sites (RS), and sound data or specifications associated with intended operating
dam systems and processes. Laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards that may influence the
sound impact assessment for this study will also be inventoried.
Seasonal Surveys of Ambient Sound Levels
Ambient sound level measurements will be collected in the Aesthetic Resources Study Area,
with the goal of establishing baseline soundscape data. Analysis locations will coincide with
KOPs identified for the visual resource assessment, including both viewer [receptor]-based (OPs,
OAs, and OCs), and landscape-based (LCPs). Landscape-based sound measurements will be
used to understand current and future conformance with ROS designations. Based on input from
the wildlife resource study, additional sound monitoring locations may be added to areas with
documented wildlife concentration. Sound measurements will include unattended long-term
([LT]”, a minimum of 24 continuous hours, up to a single week) sound level monitoring at up to
a total of four representative NSR or RS locations, and up to a total of 16 attended short-term
([ST], e.g., 15-20 minutes duration each) daytime and nighttime sound measurements to help
characterize the affected environment. Observations of perceived and identifiable sources of
sound contributing to the ambient sound environment and the conditions during which they
occur will be documented as part of the field survey. This survey will be conducted four times,
associated with each of the four distinct seasons (e.g., summer, fall, winter, spring). To the extent
practicable, the survey locations will be the same for each surveyed season.
Modeling of Project Sound Levels.
Up to three scenarios or alternatives of future Project operational sound levels will be estimated
with System for the Prediction of Acoustic Detectability (SPreAD) (Reed 2010). Computer
Aided Noise Abatement (CADNA/A), an industry-accepted outdoor sound propagation modeling
program, could also be used (Sound Advice Acoustics Ltd, 2012). Predicted sound level
isopleths or “sound contours” will be superimposed on suitable aerial photographs or maps of the
Project vicinity and will include specific sound level prediction at selected measurement and/or
assessment locations from the ambient sound field surveys of Task 2. Predicted sound emissions
associated with both Project construction and operation using different transportation route
options will also be assessed.
GIS Maps and Figures
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-9 July 2013
Viewsheds, analysis locations, and soundscapes will be mapped using GIS following Project
geospatial standards. Mapping will also identify relevant management standards within the study
area. Significant visual features will be photographed for inclusion in the Aesthetic Resources
Report. Visual simulations depicting the appearance of the proposed Project will be produced for
a subset of KOPs, and used to inform the impact analysis.
12.6.5. Consistency with Generally Accepted Scientific Practice
The methods and work efforts outlined in this Study Plan are the same or consistent with
analyses used by applicants and licensees and relied upon by FERC in other hydroelectric
licensing proceedings. The visual resource studies are based on the BLM’s visual resources
methodology. The sound analysis is consistent with NPS Guidelines.
12.6.6. Schedule
Upon implementation, the term of the Aesthetic Resources Study will be two years. In 2014 and
2015, licensing participants will have opportunities to review and comment on the study reports
(Initial Study Report in early 2014 and Updated Study Report in early 2015). Updates on the
study progress will be provided during Technical Workgroup meetings which will be held
quarterly in 2013 and 2014 (See Table 12.6-1).
12.6.7. Relationship with Other Studies
Interdisciplinary coordination will be an essential component of the Aesthetic Resources Study
and will result in efficient collection and analyses of data common between studies for the
Project. Coordination will occur with other Project studies focused on recreation, cultural
resources, subsistence, socioeconomics and transportation, geomorphology, ice processes, water
quality, and riparian vegetation. Data collected by other studies will inform the approach to and
eventual development of an Aesthetics Resources Report by identifying locations of common,
sensitive, or valued aesthetic resources and/or areas where potential changes to biophysical
processes could impact scenery attributes within the primary study area. The Initial Study
Report in early 2014 will include any proposed modifications to the study plan based on the first
year of data collected on the lower river uses, hydrology, and ice processes.
Coordination with Recreation Resources (Section 12.5) (including Recreation River Flow and
Access [Section 12.7]) will include identification of recreational use areas, including areas of
targeted use (i.e., trails, river/stream corridors, access points, State Parks) and areas of dispersed
use. Analysis locations will be established in these areas to quantify aesthetic experience,
including both scenery attributes and soundscape. Data pertaining to recreation use and demand,
experiential preferences, and place-base value obtained from household and intercept surveys
will inform the visual sensitivity analysis. Because of the integration between Aesthetics
Resources and Recreation, it is expected that data will be shared in an ongoing manner (i.e., Q1
2013- Q4 2013).
Coordination with Cultural Resources (Section 13.0) will include identification of eligible or
identified TCPs within the primary study area and establish analysis locations through
collaboration with cultural resource study leads. It is expected that data will be shared in an
ongoing manner throughout 2013-2014, recognizing restrictions applied to protect sensitive data.
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-10 July 2013
Coordination with Subsistence Resources (Section 14.0) will focus on identifying areas within
the primary study area that are used for subsistence purposes, or to access other areas used for
subsistence to establish analysis location for both scenery attributes and soundscape. Additional
coordination with subsistence resource study leads will identify questions pertaining to visual
sensitivity and place-based value to be added to both household surveys and traditional and local
knowledge interviews (Q3 2013- Q1 2014).
Input from the Socioeconomics and Transportation (Section 15.6 and 15.7) studies will include
data on recreation and subsistence use values, quality of life, community use patterns, non-use
environmental values, and social conditions of the area to inform the visual sensitivity level
analysis. Socioeconomics data is expected to be available in Q1 2014. Data obtained from the
Transportation Resources Study (Section 15.7) will be evaluated to understand anticipated
changes related to transportation demands that could affect aesthetic resources (Q3 2013– Q1
2014).
Coordination with Riparian Instream Flow Study (Section 8.6) will be used to understand
potential changes in riparian vegetation that would result in detectable changes in scenic
attributes of the river corridor. Riparian instream flow data is expected Q4 2014, and will be used
to refine the aesthetics resources impact analysis.
Coordination with Water Quality (Section 5.0) will focus on identifying expected changes in
water quality parameters that would be detectable to viewers situated on or near the river (3Q
2014).
Coordination with Water Quality (Section 5.0) will focus on identifying expected changes in
water quality parameters that would be detectable to viewers situated on or near the river. Water
quality data is expected to be available Q3 2014.
Input from the Geomorphology Study (Section 6.5) will include determination of whether the
geomorphic response to Project operations will result in detectable changes in downstream
scenery attributes (Q1 2013 – Q4 2014).
Coordination with Hydrology-Related Resources (Section 7.0) will be used to understand
hydrologic conditions that may affect scenic attributes and soundscape. A major focus will be on
reviewing results of the Ice Processes in the Susitna River Study (Section 7.6) to better
understand expected changes in the type, distribution, and seasonality of ice cover on the Susitna
River, downriver of the proposed dam (Q4 2013).
Anticipated coordination actions and outcomes are graphically depicted in Figure 12.6-2.
12.6.8. Level of Effort and Cost
The estimated cost of the Aesthetics Resources Study is $835,000.
12.6.9. Literature Cited
Alaska Energy Authority (AEA). 2011b. Pre-application Document: Susitna-Watana
Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 14241. Prepared for the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 1986. Visual Resource Inventory. BLM Handbook 8410-1.
Washington, D.C.
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-11 July 2013
National Park Service (NPS). “In the Field.” 2012. Published online at
http://nature.nps.gov/sound/field.cfm. Accessed 6/17/2012.
Reed, S.E., J.L. Boggs and J.P. Mann. 2010. SPreAD-GIS: an ArcGIS toolbox for modeling the
propagation of engine noise in a wildland setting. Version 2.0. The Wilderness Society,
San Francisco, CA. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Alaska
Regional Office. March 7, 2012.
Sound Advice Acoustics, Ltd. 2012. “CADNA Prediction Software.” Published online at
http://www.soundadviceacoustics.co.uk/prediction_software.php. Accessed 06/18/12.
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-12 July 2013
12.6.10. Tables
Table 12.6-1. Preliminary Recommendations for Analysis Locations.
Analysis Goal Locations Being Considered Outcome Mid Susitna River Valley Evaluate potential
impacts of transmission
and access routes to
aesthetic resources of
the Mid Susitna River
Valley.
Include upland and river-based Analysis
Locations, including:
• Susitna River, view downriver from
perspective of a boater
• Susitna River, view upriver from
perspective of a boater (jetboat)
• View from rail line
• Upland, from perspective of existing
trails
• Upland, from dispersed recreation and/or
subsistence use areas
• Aerial views, from common flight path
used for flightseeing
• Understand landscape
absorption
• Identify changes in scenic
quality due to introduction
of cultural modification
• Where possible, inform
engineering team to consider
potential design options
Evaluate new access to
views of both the
Susitna River Basin,
and the surrounding
areas that may be
created from access
routes and transmission
corridors
Evaluate each proposed
route to determine
where new views to
focal or large-scale
panoramic views would
be accessible. Use
viewshed modeling to
support the selection of
analysis locations
• Select locations on and adjacent to
proposed access routes and transmission
line corridors
• Identify areas where
increased access to focal or
panoramic views may
increase exposure to certain
viewsheds
• Identify areas where access
to noteworthy natural
features may change
• Use information to inform
understanding of post-
Project visual sensitivity
Evaluate the change in
appearance of
downstream river
attributes as a result of
the proposed Project.
• View downriver, from perspective of a
boater. Identify islands and/or riparian
areas influenced by hydrologic regimes
(i.e. multi-aged stands / varied
vegetation communities)
• View from existing winter trail toward
ice bridge (note that this analysis will be
coordinated to the outcome of the ice
processes study)
• View from upland trail, and/or dispersed
recreation / subsistence use area
• At transect locations for ice
• Define anticipated changes
to riparian vegetation and
related perceivable potential
indirect impacts to aesthetic
resources (i.e., increased
enclosure, potentially
decreased
heterogeneity/contrast
across vegetation
communities)
• Characterize existing scenic
quality attributes of ice
bridges, with a focus on
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-13 July 2013
Analysis Goal Locations Being Considered Outcome
processes/geomorphology/riparian
vegetation studies
those areas where ice bridge
formation has been recorded
across multiple years;
evaluate anticipated change
in these attributes (spatially
and/or temporally) based on
input from ice processes
work
• Define anticipated change in
landscape character of the
Valley
• View of river valley from upland area,
i.e., locations with existing view of the
Mid Susitna River Basin (i.e., Denali
State Park; rail line; trails)
• If determined to be
detectable by the study,
define anticipated changes
to character of the river that
may result from operation of
the Project
• Demonstrate differences in
ability to detect change as a
function of distance from the
Project Devils Canyon Evaluate the change in
the appearance, if any,
of riverflow within
Devils Canyon as a
result of the proposed
Project
• View downriver from perspective of a
low flying aircraft
• Define anticipated change to
aesthetic attributes based on
possible change in flow
regime
• View upriver from perspective of a jet
boat operator (base of DC)
• Define anticipated change to
aesthetic attributes based on
change in flow regime
Evaluate potential
impacts of transmission
and access routes to
aesthetic resources of
Devils Canyon
• View from river canyon, south toward
corridor (visibility questionable)
• Define impacts to scenic
quality attributes of Devils
Canyon that may result from
access roads and
transmission lines
Evaluate new access to
views of Devils Canyon
due to access roads and
transmission corridors
• If determined that views would be
accessible, select locations on and
adjacent to proposed access routes
• Describe scenic quality
attributes of views accessed
by roads and/or transmission
corridors Susitna River / Vee (River) Canyon Evaluate change in
mechanism of view(s)
within the inundation
zone
• View upriver / downriver from within
Susitna River corridor (existing)
• Disclose anticipated changes
in viewer experience due to
formation of the reservoir
Evaluate change in
landscape features
(landform, vegetation,
waterform, cultural
modification)
• View upriver / downriver from within
Susitna River corridor (existing), with
analysis location established at height of
reservoir
• Identify change in scenic
quality attributes of
landform, vegetation,
waterform, cultural
modification
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-14 July 2013
Analysis Goal Locations Being Considered Outcome
Evaluate change in
views of the existing
river corridor
(waterform) following
inundation and
formation of the
reservoir
• Views of the river from existing access
trails, and upland areas used for
dispersed recreation and/or subsistence
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes and
associated scores based on
introduction of prominent
water feature in viewshed Susitna Upland Wet Tundra Basin Evaluate change in
views of the existing
river corridor
(waterform) following
inundation and
formation of the
reservoir
• Views of the river from existing access
trails, and upland areas used for
dispersed recreation and/or subsistence
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes and
associated scores based on
introduction of prominent
water feature in viewshed Portage Lowlands Evaluate change in
seasonal attributes of
river downstream of the
proposed dam site as a
result of varied flow
regimes
• Views from existing trail; views from
mouth of creek
• Identify change in scenic
quality attributes of
landform, vegetation,
waterform, cultural
modification. Consider
focus on flow-based
aesthetic qualities
Evaluate potential
impacts to landscape
character that may
result from access roads
and/or transmission
lines
• Views from proposed access roads and
transmission lines
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes that may
result from introduction of
roads and transmission
corridors.
• Use information gleaned
from analysis to inform
engineering design and
design options
Evaluate new access to
views of Portage
Lowlands and Portage
Creek due to access
roads and transmission
corridors.
• Select locations on and adjacent to
proposed access routes and transmission
line corridors.
• Describe scenic quality
attributes of views accessed
by roads and/or transmission
corridors
Evaluate potential
impacts to landscape
character that may
result from access roads
and/or transmission
lines
• Views from existing trails; dispersed
recreation and/or subsistence use areas
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes that may
result from introduction of
roads and transmission
corridors.
• Use information gleaned
from analysis to inform
engineering design options
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-15 July 2013
Analysis Goal Locations Being Considered Outcome Chulitna Moist Tundra Uplands Evaluate new access to
views of Portage
Lowlands and Portage
Creek, Devils Canyon
(noteworthy natural
feature), Devils Creek
Falls (noteworthy
natural feature), the
dam structure and
reservoir due to access
roads and transmission
corridors.
• Views from proposed access roads and
transmission corridors.
• Describe scenic quality
attributes of views accessed
by roads and/or transmission
corridors
Evaluate potential
impacts to landscape
character that may
result from access roads
and/or transmission
lines
• Views from existing trails; dispersed
recreation and/or subsistence use areas
• Views from Tsusena Butte / Lake
• Views from Denali Highway, with
emphasis on existing pull-
outs/established vistas
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes that may
result from introduction of
roads and transmission
corridors.
• Use information gleaned
from analysis to inform
engineering design options Wet Upland Tundra Evaluate new access to
views of Deadman
Creek, the dam
structure and reservoir
due to access roads and
transmission corridors
• Views from proposed access roads and
transmission corridors
• Describe scenic quality
attributes of views accessed
by roads and/or transmission
corridors
Evaluate potential
impacts to landscape
character that may
result from access roads
and/or transmission
lines
• Views from the Susitna River
• Views from rail line
• Views from Sherman interpretive signs
• Views from existing trails; dispersed
recreation and/or subsistence use areas
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes that may
result from introduction of
roads and transmission
corridors
• Use information gleaned
from analysis to inform
engineering design options Talkeetna Uplands Evaluate new access to
views of Devils
Canyon, the Mid-
Susitna River valley
due to access roads and
transmission corridors,
including cumulative
effects due to existing
transmission corridor
• Views from proposed access roads and
transmission corridors
• Describe scenic quality
attributes of views accessed
by roads and/or transmission
corridors
Evaluate change in
views of the existing
river corridor
(waterform) following
inundation and
formation of the
reservoir
• Views of the river from existing access
trails, and upland areas used for
dispersed recreation and/or subsistence
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes and
associated scores based on
introduction of prominent
water feature in viewshed
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-16 July 2013
Analysis Goal Locations Being Considered Outcome Talkeetna Mountains Evaluate potential
impacts to landscape
character that may
result from the dam
structure, access roads
and/or transmission
lines
• Views from Fog Lakes
• Views from Stephan Lake
• Views from dispersed recreation and/or
subsistence use areas
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes that may
result from introduction of
roads and transmission
corridors
• Use information gleaned
from analysis to inform
design options to enhance
aesthetic attributes of the
project Susitna Upland Terrace Evaluate change in
views of the existing
river corridor
(waterform) following
inundation and
formation of the
reservoir
• Views of the river from existing access
trails, and upland areas used for
dispersed recreation and/or subsistence
• Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes and
associated scores based on
introduction of prominent
water feature in viewshed
Evaluate new access to
views of Devils
Canyon, the dam
structure, and the
reservoir (including
Watana Creek) due to
access roads and
transmission corridors,
including any
cumulative effects due
to existing transmission
corridor
• Views from proposed access roads and
transmission corridors
• Consider views of portions of the river
located directly downriver of the dam
where ice formation may change as a
result of Project Operations
• Describe scenic quality
attributes of views accessed
by roads and/or transmission
corridors
• Demonstrate open water
area below dam during
winter
Evaluate change in
views of the existing
river corridor
(waterform) following
inundation and
formation of the
reservoir
• Views of the river from existing access
trails, and upland areas used for
dispersed recreation and/or subsistence
Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes and
associated scores based on
introduction of prominent
water feature in viewshed
(i.e., does this feature
enhance or distract) Susitna Upland Evaluate impacts to
landscape character
when viewed from the
air
• Views from common flightseeing routes. • Identify changes in scenic
quality attributes that may
result from introduction of
the reservoir, dam facility,
roads and transmission
corridors. Air Tour Routes1 Evaluate change in
scenic attributes of the
river as a result of
changes in flow volume
• Montana Creek Recreation Site • Understanding of how
specific metrics of scenic
quality related to river flow
could change as a result of
operation of the Project
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 12.6-17 July 2013
Analysis Goal Locations Being Considered Outcome Susitna River, downstream of Talkeetna Evaluate potential
changes to aesthetic
attributes related to
changes in ice
processes and/or river
flows; note that the
extent to which these
areas are evaluated will
depend on the outcome
of analysis of modeling
completed relating to
ice processes and river
flows
• Montana Creek Recreation Site
• Winter Trail(s) at Delta Islands
• Iditarod NHT Winter Trail
• Identify potential changes to
aesthetic attributes related to
changes in ice processes
and/or river flows, if any
Table 12.6-2. Aesthetic Resources Study Schedule.
Activity 2012 2013 2014 2015
1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q
Viewshed Modeling
Baseline Data Collection (Aesthetics
and Soundscape) -------- -------
Simulation Development / Sound
Modeling -------- -------
Effects Analysis -------- -------
Initial Study Report Δ
Updated Study Report ▲
Legend:
Planned Activity
Δ Initial Study Report (February 2014)
▲ Updated Study Report (February 2015)
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 18 July 2013
12.6.11. Figures
Figure 12.6-1 Aesthetic resources study area.
FINAL STUDY PLAN AESTHETIC RESOURCES STUDY 12.6
Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority
FERC Project No. 14241 Page 19 July 2013
Figure 12.6-2 Study interdependencies for aesthetics.