Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSuWa206Alaska Resources Library & Information Services Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page Title: Susitna-Watana Dam Hydroelectric Project terrestrial wildlife resources : Division of Wildlife Conservation proposals SuWa 206 Author(s) – Personal: Author(s) – Corporate: Alaska Department of Fish and Game AEA-identified category, if specified: AEA-identified series, if specified: Series (ARLIS-assigned report number): Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project document number 206 Existing numbers on document: Published by: [Alaska : Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 2012?] Date published: [2012] Published for: Date or date range of report: Volume and/or Part numbers: Final or Draft status, as indicated: Document type: Slide presentation. No commentary. Pagination: [14] p. Related work(s): Pages added/changed by ARLIS: Notes: Proposals on research steps to be taken and management goals for caribou (specifically the Nelchina and Delta herds), moose, and ptarmigan. The focus is on Game Management Unit 13. All reports in the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document series include an ARLIS- produced cover page and an ARLIS-assigned number for uniformity and citability. All reports are posted online at http://www.arlis.org/resources/susitna-watana/ Division of Wildlife Conservation Proposals Management Objectives: 35,000-40,000; and ensure consistently high sustainable harvest levels for Alaska Hunters. 2011 Population estimate: 40,233 Population increased 18,737 – 27,528 1980’s, Increased use of historical summer and winter range in northwest portion of herd’s range. Herd passes through proposed project area during annual migrations. Management Objectives: 5,000 – 7,000 2007 Population estimate: 2,985 Increased use of the proposed project area since the previous studies in 1980’s further complicates the picture. Mixing of the Delta and Nelchina herds was documented beginning in 2006. 1) document seasonal use of, and movement through the greater Susitna-Watana hydroelectric project area by bulls and cows of both the NCH and the DCH,  2) determine relative importance of the greater project area to both the NCH and DCH, and 3) document productivity and calf survival of caribou utilizing the greater project area. Key Elements Add VHF collars to sample of bull caribou in both herds. Monitor radio collars monthly via aerial radiotelemtry w/ weekly monitoring during spring and fall crossing periods as well as during calving. Deploy Geographic Positioning System (GPS)/Argos satellite collar on bulls and cows to detect fine-scale movements for both herds. POPULATION OBJECTIVE Increase the unit moose population to 20,000–25,000 moose with a minimum of: 25–30 calves:100 cows 25 total bulls:100 cows 10 yearling bulls:100 cows in the fall. Eight continuous count areas surveyed annually show increasing population trend. Current surveys provide population composition and trend data. 1)document moose population composition and density in the greater Susitna-Watana hydroelectric project area, 2) determine relative importance of the greater project area to cow and bull moose, and 3) document productivity and calf survival of moose utilizing the greater project area. Key Elements Continue count area aerial composition counts. Conduct population estimates above and below proposed dam site. Assess moose movements in the project area, as well as productivity and survival, a sample of cow and bull moose will be radio collared. Deploy Geographic Positioning System (GPS)/Argos satellite collars on bulls and cows to detect fine-scale movements for both sexes. Little known about population dynamics (abundance, survival, seasonal movements) Spring roadside surveys on the Denali, Parks, and Richardson highways indicate low or declining populations for past ten years. Board of Game (BOG) reduced daily bag limit in 13A, 13B, 13E from 10 to 5 (Dec. 1- March 31) in RY 2005-2006. BOG further restricted harvest in GMU 13B by closing season November 30 beginning in RY 2009-2010. Possibility of increased human access and activity in GMU subunits 13A and 13E Need further understanding of ptarmigan abundance, distribution, and migratory patterns Value of northwest subunit 13A and southern 13E for ptarmigan is uncertain. Creating access points to the project site would allow large scale human vehicle access for hunters and recreational users to portions of GMU 13 that are currently inaccessible. These portions of subunits 13A and 13E may offer refugia for the larger GMU 13 ptarmigan population that increased human access may impact to an unknown degree. 1)Estimate the seasonal distribution of willow ptarmigan in game management subunits 13A, 13B, and 13E. 2)Estimate seasonal migratory patterns of willow ptarmigan in game management subunits 13A, 13B, and 13E. 3)Estimate fall and spring abundance and occupancy of ptarmigan in game management subunits 13A, 13B, and 13E. 4)Estimate seasonal survival of willow ptarmigan in game management subunits 13A, 13B, and 13E. Key Elements Annually tag 30 willow ptarmigan in each subunit (13A, 13B, 13E) with a necklace radio transmitter. Relocate birds 6 times August/September-summer/fall, dispersal November – March-winter hunting season April-May-breeding 13E 13A 13B Denali Highway Parks Highway Richardson Highway Glenallen Paxson Cantwell Glenn Watana Hydroelectric Project Site Denali Chulitna Gold