The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCrescent Lake-Creek Hydroelectric Project Alternative Energy Grant Proposal - Feb 2008 - REF Grant 2195334Homer Electric Association, Inc. Corporate Office Central Peninsula Service Center 3977 Lake Street 280 Airpott Way Horner, Alaska 99603-7680 Kenai, Alaska 99611-5280 Phone (907) 235-8551 Phone (907) 283-5831 FAX (907) 235-3313 FAX (907) 283-7122 PROJECT SPECIFIC INFORMATION In support of the ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION GRANT APPLICATION For CRESCENT LAKE/CREEK PROJECT Prepared by: Homer Electric Association, Inc. February 11, 2008 2008-02-11 AEA Alt Energy Grant App - Crescent Lake A Touchstone Energy Cooperative. ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Homer Electric Association, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION C �Mk� HEA is evaluating the potential for a small, low -impact hydra facility utilizing the water resources provided by Crescent Lake/Creek. Crescent Lake, at an approximate elevation of 1,500 ft MSL, is located approximately 3.0 mi west of the Seward Highway, near the town of Moose Pass in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska. The nearest major town is Seward, which is located approximately 30 miles south of Moose Pass. A map of the proposed project location is provided below. � 73 Ie } r E 5 ; 7 a i L The Crescent Lake watershed is about 25 miz, and the lake has an approximate surface area of 2,040 ac. The project would generate power with approximately 980 ft of head and have an anticipated generation capacity of about 5.0 MW. February 11, 2008 Page 2 of 7 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Homer Electric Association, Inc. — As part of an initial assessment, information gathering would be undertaken to assess the feasibility of constructing a dam to raise the surface elevation of Crescent Lake to increase storage for generation. The proposed run -of -river project would have a siphon (or gravity feed) intake in Crescent Lake. Water would be conveyed from the intake through a pipeline or penstock that would lead to a powerhouse. The powerhouse would be located near the bank of Carter Creek and would discharge into Carter Creek or Upper Trail Lake. The powerhouse tailrace would be designed to carry the project flow to Carter Creek or Upper Trail Lake. The dimensions of the tailrace would be developed based on terrain and other pertinent information to be obtained during the study phase. The project would include 1 — 2 mi of new overhead transmission line employing one of two potential transmission options: 1) power generated at the powerhouse at low voltage would be transmitted to a remote transformer, where it would be converted to 115 kV and connected to the existing transmission grid or 2) power generated at the project would be transmitted directly to the grid from a step-up transformer near the powerhouse. The legal description and ownership of lands (ADNR 2006) within the proposed project boundary are provided in the table below. All land is referenced to the Seward Meridian. Township Range Section Ownership 5N 2W 23 USDA Forest Service 5N 2W 26 USDA Forest Service 5N 2W 35 USDA Forest Service 5N 1W 21 State 5N 1W 22 State 5N 1W 27 State 5N 1W 28 USDA Forest Service 5N 1W 32 USDA Forest Service 5N 1W 33 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 4 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 5 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 7 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 8 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 9 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 17 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 18 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 19 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 20 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 29 USDA Forest Service 4N 1W 30 USDA Forest Service 4N 2W 1 USDA Forest Service 4N 2W 2 USDA Forest Service 4N 2W 11 USDA Forest Service 4N 2W 12 USDA Forest Service The project in its final form would likely consist of a dam, pipeline/penstock, powerhouse, access road, and transmission lines. All improvements could potentially affect a combination of federal, state, and private lands. No portion of the potential project area has been designated February 11, 2008 Page 3 of 7 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Homer Electric Association, Inc. — PTARMIGAN LAKE/CREEK PROJECT as a Wilderness Area, recommended for designation as a Wilderness Area, or designated as Wilderness Study Area. No portion of the project area has been included in the Wild and Scenic River System. Power from the project would be available to customers of Homer Electric Association and other areas served by the existing transmission grid. Power from the proposed project would be important to the citizens of the Kenai Peninsula and would be environmentally beneficial and cost effective as an alternative source of energy to offset fossil fuel generation. The power from the proposed project would reduce consumption of non-renewable carbon -based energy sources, thereby helping to improve air quality in Kenai Peninsula Borough. PROPOSED STUDY PROGRAM The study program, which HEA hopes will culminate in the filing of a License Application with FERC, would be conducted according to the Commission's licensing regulations. Potential Study Program Elements Engineering and feasibility • Hydrology • Bathymetry • Stream gauging • Dam stability and soils tests and analysis (if needed) • Preliminary design, i.e., unit type and size • Tunnellpipeline alignment Evaluation of transmission line route • Financial analysis Environmental Studies • Fish species composition • Fish habitat assessment • Rare, Threatened and Endangered (RTE) species inventory • Vegetation • Wildlife • Recreation • Cultural • Aesthetics • Project effects analysis Stakeholder Consultation HEA will consult with potential stakeholder entities (i.e., agencies, NGOs, Native Corporations, and communities) early in the study phase to ensure that all significant concerns are addressed February 11, 2008 Page 4 of 7 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Homer Electric Association, Inc. — PTARMIGAN LAKE/CREEK PROJECT and planned for in the studies in anticipation of the licensing process for the Ptarmigan Lake I Ptarmigan Creek project. MANAGEMENT & TECHNICAL CAPACITY Homer Electric Association is a well established railbelt electric cooperative that has been serving its members since 1945. The cooperative operates and maintains both fossil fuel and hydroelectric generation facilities, including the 120MW Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Plant. Its management and staff are well prepared to oversee the development of this small hydra facility from its conception through construction and operation. Where needed, HEA will contract with qualified firms and consultants to conduct the engineering, studies and detailed design associated with the project. PRECONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES & FINANCING It is generally recognized that initial capital costs for alternative energy projects are significantly higher than comparable fossil fuel generation assets, though the long-term benefits of alternative energy projects can be substantial. Denali Commission and AEA funding can help to offset some of these initial project screening and capital costs and contribute to the economic and social viability of an eventual project. HEA is strategically planning to expand its generation portfolio to include renewable energy sources. This application is one result of implementing this planning effort. The purpose of this long-term vision is to provide more consistently priced, environmentally responsible energy to balance the traditional generation resources currently available. One of the stated elements of the proposed study program is to develop a financial analysis or model for the project. This will be one of the first tasks undertaken by HEA along with further engineering feasibility study. The table below details the preconstruction costs that lead to a FERC license application. PRECONSTRUCTION STUDY PROGRAM ELEMENTS Budget Feasibility Evaluation (Financial & Engineering Models) $ 100,000.00 Initiate Stakeholder Consultation $ 30,000.00 Prepare and file Pre -Application Document (PAD) $ 20,000.00 FERC Scoping $ 20,000.00 Proposed Study Plan (PSP) $ 20,000.00 Revised Study Plan (RSP) $ 20,000.00 Initiate Field Studies $ 200,000.00 Complete Field Studies $ 25,000.00 Additional/Supplementary Data Collection $ 25,000.00 Draft License Application. $ 20,000.00 File License Aeplication $ 20,000.00 Total Proposed Study Program $ 500,000.00 February l t , 2008 Page 5 of 7 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Honer Electric Association, Inc. — PTARMIGAN LAKE/CREEK PROJECT The estimated cost of conducting studies, investigations, tests, surveys, mapping and developing plans and specifications for the proposed Crescent lake 1 Crescent Creek Project is $500,000. AEA funding requested here will support the feasibility evaluation listed above. Preconstruction funds will initially be drawn from a combination of grant funding and internal financing. Other options may be explored depending on the results of the preconstruction assessments. PRELIMINARY COSTS & BENEFIT -COST ESTIMATE A preliminary benefit -cost estimate is provided in the spreadsheet on the next page. Assumptions pertaining to power production, construction, financing and avoided costs are noted at the top of the analysis. The costs and savings are brought to present worth in 2008 for comparison. The benefit -cost ratio for this project is estimated at 1.95. This paragraph will briefly describe the costs considered in the analysis. Once the project is past the preconstruction phase and has entered a FERC licensing process, an additional one million dollars is allocated for licensing, further studies and detailed design. Preliminary construction capital costs for this 5.OMW project are estimated at $3,500/kW, or approximately $17,500,000. The cost of this construction capital is amortized over a thirty year period. Operations & Maintenance (O&M) costs are based on HEA experience and are escalated over the life of the project. All these costs are brought to a 2008 present worth value of $43,562,152. The project savings are estimated as HEA's avoided cost of purchasing power produced by natural gas at $8.29/MMBtu in 2007 dollars. The avoided cost of power is escalated by 5% per year over the project life and then brought to a present worth in 2008 equal to $84,735,652. February 11, 2008 Page 6 of 7 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GRANT PROPOSAL PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Hamer Electric Association, Inc. — PTARMIGAN LAKEICREEK PROJECT �Mv.O O O a` Y 3 O c u p E _ 0 0i a`U Uuw a}�M xy �R�2w'.fe�iU O's' CL � y N IdCL 14 n Iz�O. N I y p (1 V F S fl ^ N 1T.1:[ I gyp M --- •r •• y}fr b+ y�� F4i 6319s f9 f9 ?!��. F.H�� iA BiHH,�pbg yq w�f H� y"" d' 4 I aCS a .. R i.i C-M d66��JJff N6iM•f 1 m �Ml^I�N � 13tW 4'. iil f�- I- d` �6r.w�iNaaNN�N AH`HH'NMNMNNN�MH igi'N�wNw�.�w�c°iv I � 1 I"dv ox o;inN-rSS�o*c'�p,_�"$`Qim 6noooo 0000 dfooAoo.�� `"`� oo.00 rionyduoo �Nd9�NNN N'N tRN w.�si��'NN�N'N+y •nn wra%snN.N�NVFN �b'�y-HNNN-64N-w- a� QV w •ar g - c�W W-<R 'm �.f ru �. •a--- a0i �: (-n-n'+m snrovi •aw 4 y v.u�-+ifrnk d Loj 4i. (4, K,NW Ntt( 2�t[9, �!»Mh "N ti, va ire i5 [H +p Hr F.---------r----"i EL U'- w Yri aimm aU_ a Ha =9s,w Nay o« A�,vw uw'- c 0 `o U fJ F -g56Y es s9�as a�o»w -[[3� "ff.. OOII 44OO m nmm 'u, C7 mtcVo TM a-Cn rt.9f 1v2 2n M' �WhCO NCOIM1OJ ry�QNhW]�fO tG.T W lfY yO OOM tO-F-taQo,'ryC.(' rM W Ny HH.b1NHN HN NNHVF N'FRN�WNNWS9 b3NMYH.�y p'�yNNHNii ayN 69�y d ■ ,iQ�(pqu oM., k''O�, F°tjI'm p1 �Lm''R' "P<'2M Oq 1.p,[OF._nFd oho IJ I..i ry -� yJ{NypO4 ��yy CO f wpN tl[We p��MO wMr6'N0 9 t� � [G t9 -t010 it11(S M � M j.N O T OBI M f` Y'1 `F - -' wtnFrNN��+wFaasiiisN�ai`*FnNNFavieaviww•ndr`cs a p pp oqq p ppp O rFr��11 N63MN�N bf ii49 by 49Hb9H 69�NN �NN�19 Vi��NH69H�NNb9HH NH�WNNHH•HY HH�N �Q 'o Op Lei Q N U h po ppppppgqpp ppqq ppoo gqppooppqq pp gcyppppgq44 J}� O.S-PU GGGPo�ry�yyNHHMKHHd9 HS3[F 4YN HN�HH�H�HblgWf9HHNHH49 dl i9HH HN zFN m,0000000 O nOf iiaall '�^'�N f Q = p-Nr.aua [ervw -�}y€3 �.�`r'�r°r[�vnNN.�v Nr2OinNM.�i �i r"iMMnn.°'-�R7v��ea-18iK�� W � 1211 'm �.M. a_'. u_x.�_tiW_TN'NN Me.NW 1. p��i W1` �aitpi •-NM-.F [[f [D ^ Qa- O 89882Nb �.2iIN �V'N M M N M gg N ry'N a c<< 4 Y V.Lpi G G Ig w PV�IPR-�NNNN�N922 aR$l3 VNN VNNNRNNRR February 11, 2008 Page 7 of 7