Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUAF Organic Rankine Cycle Field Testing Tok Green Machine Project - May 2013 - REF Grant 7040046Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 1 1 TOK GREEN MACHINE INSTALLATION BY ALASKA POWER & TELEPHONE FOR UAF/ACEP May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..2 2 Cold side condensing Options…………………………………………………..3 3 Hot side heating Options……………………………………………….…………4 4 Tok Powerplant Considerations……………………………………………..…4 5 Selected Arrangement for Tok ORC…………………………………………..5 6 Cost estimate for Tok ORC Installation………………………………………5 7 ORC installation/Operation Schedule………………………………….…5-6 APPENDICES Appendix A: Tok System Loads………………..………………………………7 Appendix B: Tok Existing Heat Loads……………………………………….8 Appendix C: Available Jacket Water Heat………………………………..9 Appendix D: Heat Recovery Modifications…………………………10-23 Appendix E: ORC Installation Cost………………………………………….24 Appendix F: ORC Installation Schedule…………………………………..25 Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 2 2 1. Introduction: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska Center for Energy and Power (UAF/ACEP) was awarded a grant to demonstrate an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) generator in a diesel- fired Tanana Chief’s Conference (TCC) -affiliated community in Alaska. The ORC was procured by TCC in a previous grant and tested under laboratory conditions at UAF. Alaska Power & Telephone (AP&T) has been contracted to deploy and demonstrate the ORC in the Tok, AK powerplant. The first phase of this contract is to prepare a detailed cost estimate and timeline for modifications to the Tok plant for installation and operation of the ORC. An ORC generates electric energy by pumping a working fluid to a boiler where it changes state from liquid to gas using relatively low temperature heat. The pressurized vapor is then expanded through a turbine that turns a generator and then returns to a liquid in a condenser using a cooling medium. The working fluid boils at relatively low temperature enabling an ORC to operate with low temperature heat sources such as diesel jacket water, geothermal or industrial waste heat. The ORC procured by TCC is a machine manufactured by ElectraTherm, Inc. This unit is referred to by ElectraTherm as the Green Machine. While the output is rated at 30- 50kw, it is highly dependent on the temperatures and heat capacity of the hot and cold sides. Several different heating and cooling alternatives were considered for the installation in the Tok plant. Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 3 3 2. COLD SIDE CONDENSING HEAT SINK OPTIONS CONSIDERED Cooling Tower: ACEP has a cooling tower available. The cooling capacity and outlet temperature are a function of ambient wet bulb temperature. Advantages: moderate water requirements, reduced civil site work. Disadvantages: parasitic fan and pumping loads, cold weather freeze issues, ice fog, condenser scaling. Ground Loop Heat Sink: Advantages: Simple plastic pipe coils placed in trenches and manifolded together. Disadvantages: very large area required for heat dissipation, subject to non-repairable (winter) leaks, potential for dig in, frost heave damage, permafrost melt, heat transfer reduced with glycol fluid. Radiator and Fans: Advantages: no water requirement, no scale issues with glycol, no civil construction, minimal fan requirement in the winter. Disadvantages: physically large and expensive ($72k per McKinley), cooling limited during high ambient temps, requires exterior cleaning maintenance, requires glycol which lowers thermal exchange and is a hazmat, introduces pump and fan loads. Exchanger in a well: Advantages: same advantages as the radiator plus the fan load are eliminated. Disadvantages: large diameter well casing needed, custom built heat exchanger to fit in well, exchanger design dependent on factors that would require studies such as soil heat capacity, subterranean water flows etc, large wells do not lend themselves to rural village construction. Well or River water: Advantages: river or lake water available in many rural villages, the Tok aquifer is believed to have sufficient supply (95gpm) of 38F water, no additional parasitic loads beyond pumping, Disadvantages: requires significant water supply, requires drain field, may create scale in the condenser, may require pump to recirculate some of the discharge if the flow rate is too low. Combination of radiator and well water: Advantages: utilize radiator in cold weather and well water in the warm weather potentially reducing parasitic pumping and fan loads, no scale issues in the GM. Disadvantages: the cold circuit will require pumped glycol through the radiator and a heat exchanger between the well water Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 4 4 and the glycol/radiator circuit, glycol and exchanger will decrease heat transfer efficiency, more complicated operation and control, questionable reduction in parasitic loads. 3. HOT SIDE HEAT RECOVERY OPTIONS CONSIDERED Exhaust heat recovery: Approximately a third of the heat produced by the fuel is expelled in the exhaust of a diesel engine. Of this amount, approximately 40-50% is recoverable. Advantages: utilizes more of the heat available allowing an ORC match with a smaller diesel generator, higher temperatures are available providing a greater delta T between the ORC hot and cold side. Disadvantages: Coolant circulation must be maintained or the exchanger will become a boiler (this is overcome if the engine coolant pump is used to maintain circulation), exhaust exchangers foul with soot and need frequent cleaning (may be automated with soot blowers), high cost. Jacket water heat recovery: Approximately a quarter of the heat produced by the fuel in a diesel engine is rejected to the jacket water, oil cooler and aftercooler. The jacket water is cooled via radiator and fans or some other heat exchange device. Almost all of the jacket water heat is recoverable. Some diesels utilize a separate circuit aftercooler (SCAC) that has a separate radiator or exchanger providing lower temperature engine inlet air than possible with the jacket water. Heat recovery from the SCAC is generally not feasible due to the lower temperature. Typical engine jacket water temperature is 185F to 195F. To eliminate freeze problems, 60% glycol/water mix is used where there will be exposure to arctic temperatures. This provides freeze protection to -70F but reduces cooling capacity by 12%. 4. TOK POWERPLANT CONSIDERATIONS The Green Machine ORC requires at least 1 million BTU’s per hour of heat. This amount of heat is typically available from the jacket water of a diesel operating at 700 to 1000 kW electrical load. The Tok system electrical loads vary from winter to summer and over the course of each day. Tok loads are shown in Appendix A. The Tok power plant has six Caterpillar diesel generators. A heat recovery system captures jacket water heat from all but the smallest engine and is utilized for the building complex heat and maintaining the temperature of the non- operating generators. In the winter, the heat recovery loop temperatures drop to as low as Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 5 5 150F. Modifications to the heat recovery system will need to be made to capture additional heat for the ORC. While the heat available at the Tok plant is a function of the system load, other heat loads reduce the amount of heat available for the ORC operation. Appendix B shows the approximate existing heat loads for winter and summer. The manufacturers’ heat rejection data varies by model so the heat available is dependent on which generators are running. The largest generator, Unit 7, can carry the entire Tok load solo. At other times, there will be two generators running in parallel. Appendix C shows the potential jacket water heat available for winter and summer, high and low load periods, and with single or parallel generator operation. It appears that the ORC output will be limited during the low load periods. In order to capture necessary heat to operate the ORC with any combination of generators operating, modifications will need to be made to the Tok heat recovery system. This will include reconnecting the heat recovery exchangers in series, installation of thermostatically controlled valves to bypass the radiators, installing larger heat recovery exchangers and pumps. Appendix D includes diagrams of the heat recovery system and proposed modifications. 5. SELECTED ARRANGEMENT FOR TOK ORC Several alternative arrangements have been considered for demonstration of the TCC ORC in the Tok diesel plant. The selected configuration places the ORC next to diesel Unit 7 which is at the west end of the heat recovery loop. The heat recovery system will be upgraded to the extent possible with funding available. Cooling will utilize water from well No. 2 and discharge into a new drainfield or possibly into Well No.3. The power from the ORC will be connected to the plant 480 volt station service panel located to the north. See Appendix D. 6. COST ESTIMATE FOR TOK ORC INSTALLATION The installation of the Green Machine has been broken down into tasks for which materials and labor have been estimated. Total amount is $187,954. A summary of this estimate is found in Appendix E. 7. ORC INSTALLATION/OPERATION SCHEDULE The installation was scheduled assuming AP&T in-house labor resources will be available. The summer season is a busy time for AP&T and the schedule is subject to Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 6 6 changes if emergencies arise requiring reallocation of labor. Local contractors may be engaged if required to meet the schedule albeit at substantial increase in expense. AP&T would like to expedite the installation and gain as much operational experience as possible before the conclusion of the demonstration. It is unfortunate that the demonstration does not extend into the winter period. Appendix F has the summary schedule. Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 7 7 APPENDIX A TOK ELECTRICAL SYSTEM LOADS 2011 Winter Winter Spring Spring Summer Summer Fall Fall Time Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend 0:00 1200 1260 900 930 930 930 820 840 1:00 1080 1200 870 900 900 930 820 810 2:00 1050 1140 840 840 870 870 780 780 3:00 1050 1110 840 840 810 780 780 780 4:00 1020 1140 850 840 810 780 780 750 5:00 1050 1140 900 810 780 810 810 780 6:00 1080 1170 1050 840 900 870 990 840 7:00 1260 1200 1200 930 1050 990 1170 900 8:00 1380 1260 1260 1020 1170 1080 1230 990 9:00 1490 1320 1260 1110 1230 1080 1200 1050 10:00 1500 1440 1290 1140 1260 1140 1320 1080 11:00 1500 1500 1290 1170 1200 1140 1290 1110 12:00 1500 1530 1300 1170 1230 1100 1230 1140 13:00 1560 1530 1260 1110 1230 1140 1260 1080 14:00 1470 1530 1230 1140 1200 1200 1200 1080 15:00 1500 1500 1170 1110 1200 1140 1260 1110 16:00 1380 1490 1170 1110 1170 1170 1200 1080 17:00 1380 1550 1140 1050 1170 1170 1200 1110 18:00 1500 1560 1110 1080 1200 1170 1170 1170 19:00 1560 1560 1110 1020 1200 1200 1230 1200 20:00 1440 1500 1050 1020 1200 1170 1200 1170 21:00 1380 1400 1100 1020 1200 1230 1110 1050 22:00 1320 1380 1100 1000 1140 1110 990 960 23:00 1260 1290 1020 1020 1080 1020 870 870 AVERAGE 1330 1363 1096 1009 1089 1051 1080 989 Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 8 8 APPENDIX B Tok Estimated Heating Loads Winter Non Winter Exchanger EST BTU/hr EST BTU/hr Office building Basement baseboard 100,000 40,000 Mgr House Basement baseboard 100,000 40,000 Truck Shop Dual Rads (2) Young CL174 Rad/Fan 168,000 50,000 Truck Shop N Rad Modine AK3-1 Rad/Fan 100,000 20,000 Garage Radiator /Fan 20,000 - Garage/Office Baseboard 10,000 2,000 Powerplant office Baseboard 10,000 2,000 Switchgear Room Radiator /Fan 50,000 10,000 Well house Radiator /Fan 5,000 - Fuel heat exchanger Radiator /Fan 5,000 - C175 (winter heater) Radiator /Fan 380,000 - No 3 heat HR exchanger/eng circ pump 10,000 10,000 No 4 heat HR exchanger/eng circ pump 10,000 10,000 No 5 heat HR exchanger/eng circ pump 10,000 10,000 No 9 heat HR exchanger/eng circ pump 10,000 10,000 No 8 heat HR exchanger/eng circ pump 10,000 10,000 No 7 heat Electric heaters 998,000 214,000 Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 9 9 APPENDIX C Tok Diesel Plant Jacket Water Heat Available After Heat Recovery Modifications C175 Solo Operation Winter High Winter low Summer High Summer Low Load (kw) 1560 1020 1260 750 JW BTU/hr 4,301,640 2820720 3,477,840 2019000 Net after plant heat loads 3,303,640 1,822,720 3,263,840 1,805,000 Est Heat Available for ORC 2,609,876 1,439,949 2,578,434 1,425,950 Parallel Operation non C175 Winter High Winter low Summer High Summer Low Load (kw) 1560 1020 1260 750 JW BTU/hr 2,916,000 1,944,000 2,481,600 1,551,000 Net after plant heat loads 1,918,000 946,000 2,267,600 1,337,000 Est Heat Available for ORC 1,515,220 747,340 1,791,404 1,056,230 Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 10 10 APPENDIX D Tok Powerplant ORC Installation Heat Recovery System Modifications R1 To achieve the maximum heat gain from latent heat in jacket water of engines 3, 4, 5, 8 & 9 the following mechanical changes are planned:  Heat Recovery System Modifications o The heat recovery system will be upgraded to improve flow and increase heat exchange through heat recovery exchangers. We considered the upgrade of the system circulation pump but feel that the existing pump will be adequate with the improved flow conditions of the modified heat recovery system. The main change to the system will be reconnecting the unit heat recovery exchangers from the parallel connected configuration they are currently in to a series connected configuration. In addition isolation valves will be installed in the heat recovery header to direct heat recovery flow through operating units and reduce flow through non operating units. The size of the heat recovery system piping will be increased from 2” to 4” from the headers to the Unit 7 heat exchanger to allow the capture of the heat from the C175 engine. Connections for the ORC will be included in this new 4” piping. Heat recovery system 4” headers 2” piping connections into HE7  Modify existing 4” supply header  Install series connection ports [6 places]  Install 4” control valves [5 places]  Extend 4” supply and return headers to west side of powerplant  Replace 2” heat recovery piping to HE7 with 4” piping  Reconnect Unit 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 heat recovery exchangers  Add 4” ORC connections Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 11 11 System Drawings Plan View of Existing Tok Heat Recovery System Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 12 12 System Drawings Plan View of Modified Tok Heat Recovery System with ACEP ORC Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 13 13 System Drawings Existing System Modified System Typical Parallel Connection Typical Series Connection Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 14 14 System Drawings ACEP ORC Installation, also shows addition of 4” piping runs to HE7 Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 15 15  Unit 3 Heat Recovery Modifications o Option A  Heat recovery exchanger HE3 will be disconnected from the heat recovery piping and reconnected in series with the other heat recovery exchangers.  Remove undersized shell & tube heat exchanger and replace with new higher capacity plate exchanger  Reconnect recovery exchanger in series o Additional Optional Improvements  The existing undersized heat recovery shell and tube exchanger will be replaced with a higher capacity plate exchanger Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 16 16  Unit 4 Heat Recovery Modifications o Option  Heat recovery exchanger HE4 will be disconnected from the heat recovery piping and reconnected in series with the other heat recovery exchangers. o Additional Optional Improvements  Install a thermostatically controlled 3-way valve into engine radiator circuit Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 17 17  Unit 5 Heat Recovery Modifications o Option  Heat recovery exchanger HE5 will be disconnected from the heat recovery piping and reconnected in series with the other heat recovery exchangers. o Additional Optional Improvements  Install a thermostatically controlled 3-way valve into engine radiator circuit Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 18 18  Unit 9 Heat Recovery Modifications o Option A  Heat recovery exchanger HE9 will be disconnected from the heat recovery piping and reconnected in series with the other heat recovery exchangers. o Additional Optional Improvements  Remove plate type heat recovery exchanger and replace with higher capacity plate exchanger Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 19 19  Unit 8 Heat Recovery Modifications o Option A  No modifications required - Unit 8 currently does not have a connection into the heat recovery system. Unit 8 is used regularly to provide generation to meet peaking loads. o Additional Optional Improvements  Install heat recovery exchanger between engine cooling outlet and engine cooling exchanger inlet  Install heat recovery piping between exchanger and heat recovery headers. Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 20 20  Unit 7 Heat Recovery Modifications o Option A  Unit 7 is the large machine at Tok and operates as a sole generator when operating. The heat recovery exchanger HE7 is sufficient. A 3-way thermostatically controlled valve will be installed into the radiator circuit to improve heat transfer. HE7 is currently connected to the heat recovery system with 2” pipes that are small for rated ORC flow. New 4” pipes will be fabricated and installed to connect HE7 into the heat recovery headers.  Disconnect HE7 from 2” heat distribution system  Reconnect HE7 with 4” heat recovery system  Add thermostatically controlled 3-way valve into engine radiator circuit Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 21 21  Install ORC WCC [OPTION A] o The ElectraTherm Green Machine that was tested by ACEP will be shipped and installed in the Tok powerplant.  The ORC will be positioned near Unit 7.  The hot side connections will be made to the 4” heat recovery piping near HE7.  The cold side connections will be made to existing well #2 and new drain field that will be constructed on the south side of the powerplant  The power generated by the ORC will feed the Tok electrical grid. The ORC will be connected to the 480V service equipment located in front of Unit 7.  ACEP instrumentation will be installed for the collection of performance data Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 22 22 Additional System Improvements to Increase Heat Recovery for Higher ORC Annual Output System Drawing Additional System Improvements to Increase Heat Recovery for Higher ORC Annual Output  Adding Thermostatic Bypass Valves at Units 4 and Unit 5 o To improve the recovery of heat from the generator cooling systems in the winter 3-way thermostatic valves can be added to the radiator circuits to bypass the radiator. http://www.amot.com/tenants/amot/documents/Datasheet_B_Thermostatic_Valve_0712_rev15.pdf o A thermostatic valve will be added to the Unit 7 radiator circuit during the initial heat recovery system modifications and has been included in the budget. Also being considered is the addition of similar valves into the radiator systems of Unit 4 and 5. Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 23 23  Replacing Inefficient Heat Recovery Heat Exchangers at Units 3 and Unit 9 o The existing shell and tube heat exchanger installed on Unit 3 is undersized to deliver optimum heat transfer to the heat recovery system. o Similarly the heat recovery plate exchanger currently installed at Unit 9 is not sized correctly and was originally installed improperly each of these conditions limiting the amount of residual heat that can be transferred into the heat recovery system.  Adding a Heat Recovery Heat Exchanger at Unit 8 o Currently Unit 8 is nor equipped with an exchanger to capture jacket water heat and transfer it into the heat recovery system. Unit 8 is a small unit that is operated regularly at high efficiency to provide the electrical power required to meet peaking loads. Adding a heat recovery heat exchanger could increase the heat recovery system delivery to the ORC. Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 24 24 APPENDIX E Tok Green Machine Project AP&T UAF/ACEP 2013 25 25 APPENDIX F INSTALLATION SCHEDULE