HomeMy WebLinkAboutNikolai Post Install Report 06-20-2012-VEEP
EENNEERRGGYY AAUUDDIITT
PPOOSSTT IINNSSTTAALLLLAATTIIOONN RREEPPOORRTT
Results and Recommendations from
Energy Audit of Nikolai
For VEEP Grants
City of Nikolai, Alaska
June 20, 2012
Prepared By: Prepared For:
Ameresco, Inc.
6643 Brayton Drive
Anchorage, AK 99507
Alaska Energy Authority
City of Nikolai
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page i Nikolai, AK
TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PREFACE .................................................................................. 1
1.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 2
1.1 NIKOLAI CITY OFFICE ............................................................................................. 2
1.2 NIKOLAI MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................................................. 4
2.0 UTILITIES ....................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 ELECTRICITY ......................................................................................................... 5
2.2 FUEL ..................................................................................................................... 5
3.0 OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE PRACTICES ................................................................ 6
4.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES .............................................................. 7
4.1 ECO DESCRIPTIONS .............................................................................................. 7
4.1.1 Building Envelope Opportunities .............................................................. 8
4.1.2 Controls Opportunities ............................................................................. 8
4.1.3 Electrical Opportunities ............................................................................ 8
5.0 FINAL COSTING AND CHANGES FROM INITIAL REPORTING .................................... 9
5.1 CHANGES FROM INITIAL REPORTING ....................................................................... 9
5.2 FUNDING ALLOCATION SUMMARY TABLES ............................................................. 10
AAPPPPEENNDDIICCEESS
APPENDIX A – VEEP PROJECT COSTS & EXPECTED SAVINGS ...................................... A-1
APPENDIX B – EQUATIONS USED IN CALCULATIONS ...................................................... B-1
APPENDIX C – POST INSTALLATION PHOTOS ................................................................... C-1
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 1 Nikolai, AK
EEXXEECCUUTTIIVVEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY AANNDD PPRREEFFAACCEE
This Post Installation Report summarizes the results of an Ameresco Energy Audit of the City of Nikolai,
the initial energy savings measures identified and proposed, and any changes that may have occurred
throughout the installation process. The City of Nikolai is a recipient of an AEA Village Energy
Efficiency Program (VEEP) grant of $75,000.
Ameresco engineers conducted an energy audit of the City of Nikolai on October 27, 2010. The table
below shows the buildings audited and their respective square footages. Construction was completed in
November 2011.
City of Nikolai - Building Summary
Building Category Square Footage
City Office Public Building 4,050
Maintenance Shop Public Building N/A
The audit identified existing types, conditions, operating modes, and energy consumption profiles for a
variety of buildings, facilities and systems. The audit also identified all cost-effective system and facility
modifications, adjustments, alterations, additions, and retrofits. Systems investigated during the audit
included heating, ventilation, interior and exterior lighting, process exhaust, domestic hot water, motors,
building envelopes, utility metering systems, and energy management control systems (EMCS).
The table below shows the actual costs of the project and expected annual savings. See Appendix A for
more detailed results. Project costs include costs incurred from the site visit, engineering time, materials
cost, and labor cost, as well as Ameresco’s markup. It is important to note that the simple paybacks
(SPBs) have been determined according to ECO type. For example, the SPB for an electrical ECO is
calculated using only the annual kWh savings, even though the equivalent annual fuel gallon monetary
savings is reported.
VEEP ECOS - PROJECT COSTS & EXPECTED SAVINGS - NIKOLAI
ECO Materials Savings SPB
B01 - WEATHERSTRIPPING - NOT INSTALLED $ 739.30 N/A N/A
C01 - PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT UPGRADE $ 8,393.21 $ 982.20 8.55
E01 - T8 LIGHTING UPGRADE $ 15,128.91 $ 355.21 42.59
E02 - OCCUPANCY SENSORS - NOT INSTALLED $ 1,683.09 N/A N/A
E03 - STREET LIGHTING UPGRADE $ 48,664.94 $ 1,752.41 27.77
AVAILABLE FUNDING $ 390.55
* Available funding covers remaining project close out expenses.
TOTAL $ 75,000.00 $ 3,089.81 23.36
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 2 Nikolai, AK
11..00 BBUUIILLDDIINNGG DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONNSS
11..11 NNIIKKOOLLAAII CCIITTYY OOFFFFIICCEE
Description: The Nikolai City Office building is the main city building for the village. All village
business is handled at this facility, including utility billing and payment. The building typically operates
8 hours a day, 5 days a week.
General Conditions: The two story building is in good condition overall. Several opportunities for
improvement were found during the course of the audit walkthrough.
Pictures of general conditions found during the field audit immediately follow this building description.
Building Envelope: The building structure overall appears to be in good condition. Existing windows
are double-pane, but with a small gap. The roof is in good condition. Doors are in good condition, but
weather-stripping is inadequate and is due to be upgraded. The exterior doors to the mechanical room,
however, are in poor condition and should be upgraded. There is also a hole in the mechanical room floor
that should be patched. Several of the windows have cracked panes and are in fair condition overall.
Heating: A newly installed Lennox oil furnace provides the building with space heating. An additional
furnace has not yet been installed. These furnaces are rated at 81.0% AFUE and are in good condition. A
combustion analysis was not performed at the time of the audit. Note: These units are horizontal units but
have been installed vertically in the facility.
Controls: Mechanical thermostats control building heating.
Lighting: Interior lighting consists primarily of T12 fluorescent lamps with magnetic ballasts. There are
no occupancy sensors in the building.
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 3 Nikolai, AK
Domestic Water: A Toyotomi model OM-1248 instantaneous water heater provides the building with
domestic hot water.
Miscellaneous: The City Office also houses two electric washer and dryer sets for the villagers’
laundering needs. Occupants informed Ameresco engineers that these washer and dryers provide 2
washes per day, on average. These units are older Maytag models and are not ENERGY STAR rated.
Building Photos: Nikolai City Office
Installed Lennox Furnace Toyotomi Instantaneous Water Heater
Mechanical Room Doors Hole in Mechanical Room Floor
Maytag Washer/Dryer Set Window with Cracked Pane
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 4 Nikolai, AK
11..22 NNIIKKOOLLAAII MMAAIINNTTEENNAANNCCEE SSHHOOPP
Description: The building is in poor condition overall and shows many signs of weathering and age. The
Nikolai Maintenance Shop is no longer a heated facility. There are several Modine unit heaters in place
that formerly operated on waste heat from the generators in the adjacent building. When the old
generators were removed, however, this waste heat connection was severed and has not been reconnected.
Interior lighting consists of T12 fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts. There are no occupancy
sensors in the facility. Exterior doors are in poor condition. Because of the conditions in this building,
this facility is rarely used once the temperature drops.
Overhead Door Modine Unit Heater
Little Attic Insulation Building Exterior and Overhead Door
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 5 Nikolai, AK
22..00 UUTTIILLIITTIIEESS
22..11 EELLEECCTTRRIICCIITTYY
The City of Nikolai produces its own electricity. From the time of the audit and throughout the
calculation and report writing process, bills were not readily available to Ameresco engineers with
kilowatt-hour (kWh) usage and electric rates. Typical electric rates and power cost equalization (PCE)
rates have therefore been used in calculations. Data was used from the villages of Kaltag, Holy Cross,
and Shageluk.
Rate per kWh $ 0.5382
PCE Rate $ 0.3225
Rates for Calculations $ 0.2158
22..22 FFUUEELL
Fuel bills were not readily obtained from the City of Nikolai. Ameresco’s point of contact (POC) for the
village informed engineers that the village pays $7.50/gallon for fuel. This rate has been used in
calculations.
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 6 Nikolai, AK
33..00 OOPPEERRAATTIIOONNSS//MMAAIINNTTEENNAANNCCEE PPRRAACCTTIICCEESS
The village has a number of designated maintenance personnel that seem to possess the basic skills
required to clean and maintain selected equipment. From Ameresco’s observations, if the equipment
should fall into disrepair, the staff does not have the training or experience to repair the equipment per the
manufacturer’s requirements and tends to piece together the equipment to maintain operation. Over time,
the systems no longer function as required, which currently appears to be the case of most equipment and
systems with in the village.
Operations and maintenance is one area in energy services where improvement and training costs are
lower than equipment replacement costs, and the energy efficiency return is high. During the site audit,
Ameresco found that outside of general cleaning, most of the equipment is not maintained to meet
standard manufacturers’ recommendations. Dirty filters, boilers in disrepair, systems altered, and control
systems disconnected are a result of limited funding and lack of system training. This results in excessive
energy use, premature equipment failure, and employee and resident discomfort. An annual system check
by a qualified burner service technician to perform services such as boiler cleaning, boiler tune ups,
system check out, and control system reviews will not only extend the overall life of the equipment, but
improve occupant comfort as well as increase and maintain long term energy efficiency.
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 7 Nikolai, AK
44..00 EENNEERRGGYY CCOONNSSEERRVVAATTIIOONN OOPPPPOORRTTUUNNIITTIIEESS
The ECO matrix below summarizes the energy conservation opportunities identified during the site
survey and baseline analysis. A description of each energy conservation opportunity follows the matrix.
Please Note: This matrix applies to the initial proposal and the ECOs identified during that stage of the
Nikolai project. There are some ECOs included in this section that were not performed, or the scope of
work may have changed. Section 4 is for reference only. See Section 5 for updated project information.
ECO
No.
ECO Description ECO
MATRIX
B=Building Envelope;
C=Controls; E=Electrical;
M=Mechanical;
W=Water/Wastewater;
R=Renewable
NIKOLAI
City Office
Building Envelope
B01 Door Weather-stripping Upgrade X
B02 Insulation Upgrade X
Controls
C01 Thermostat Upgrade X
Electrical
E01 T-8 Lighting Upgrade X
E02 Occupancy Sensors X
VEEP – INITIAL PROPOSAL (FINAL AUDIT REPORT)
ECO Cost Savings SPB
B01 - WEATHERSTRIPPING $ 8,000.00 $ 766.06 10.44
B02 - THERMAL INSULATION UPGRADE $ 18,000.00 $ 797.06 22.58
C01 - PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT UPGRADE $ 1,600.00 $ 982.20 1.63
E01 - T8 LIGHTING UPGRADE $ 28,000.00 $ 416.16 67.28
E02 - INSTALL OCCUPANCY SENSORS $ 1,000.00 $ 370.85 2.70
DESIGN/AUDIT $ 2,500.00
AVAILABLE FUNDING $ 15,900.00
* Available funding allocated for travel expenses, shipping, additional labor, etc
TOTAL $ 75,000.00 $ 3,332.33 22.51
44..11 EECCOO DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONNSS
Below are the descriptions of the Energy Conservation Opportunities (ECOs) that Ameresco analyzed for
the Village of Nikolai. These include Ameresco’s initial project recommendations for the village.
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 8 Nikolai, AK
44..11..11 BBuuiillddiinngg EEnnvveellooppee OOppppoorrttuunniittiieess
B01 – Door Weather-stripping Upgrade
This ECO proposes applying weather stripping to exterior door perimeters to reduce air infiltration into
the buildings. Many building doors have existing weather stripping material which is worn or missing.
B02 – Thermal Insulation Upgrade
This ECO proposes installing blown-in roof insulation on existing building envelopes to reduce energy
consumption. Insulation can be added to roofs to increase or renew their insulating ratings (R-value).
44..11..22 CCoonnttrroollss OOppppoorrttuunniittiieess
C01 – Thermostat Upgrade
This ECO proposes replacing the outdated mechanical thermostats with 7-day programmable thermostats.
The programmable thermostats would allow a building’s HVAC system to be scheduled to operate in
comfortable conditions while occupied and allow for night set-backs.
44..11..33 EElleeccttrriiccaall OOppppoorrttuunniittiieess
E01 – T8 Lighting Upgrade
This ECO proposes replacing current T-12 fluorescent lighting and magnetic ballast with T-8 lamps and
electronic ballasts. Post-light levels will be nearly equal or better to that of the existing lighting systems,
E02 – Occupancy Sensors
Lighting systems are often left energized in unoccupied areas. This ECO proposes to install sensors to
shut off lighting in unoccupied spaces. Common sensing technologies include infrared, ultrasonic, and
audible sound, often combining multiple types of sensing in one unit to avoid shutting off lights in an
occupied area.
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 9 Nikolai, AK
55..00 FFIINNAALL CCOOSSTTIINNGG AANNDD CCHHAANNGGEESS FFRROOMM IINNIITTIIAALL RREEPPOORRTTIINNGG
Due to the brief nature of these contracts and the high cost of travel to and from the villages, audits were
conducted a quickly and efficiently as possible. Once engineers have left the villages, communication is
strained at best, and gathering additional information is difficult. Because of this, assumptions must be
made during the initial ECO assessments and project cost estimates. Occasionally, Ameresco engineers
have found that previously identified projects have been externally funded from another source, but this
information usually comes too late in the process. As a result of all these factors, some previously
identified projects have been modified or abandoned. Final project costs and expected annual savings can
be found in Appendix A.
55..11 CCHHAANNGGEESS FFRROOMM IINNIITTIIAALL RREEPPOORRTTIINNGG
B01 – Door Weather-stripping Upgrade
Material was purchased and delivered to village but not installed due to lack of funding. An additional
EECGB grant has been awarded to Village of Nikolai to upgrade existing doors and windows in City
Office per Roger Jenkins and Joe Kimball (mayor).
B02 – Thermal Insulation Upgrade
Upon further investigation, the City Office was found to have a hot roof with no existing attic space. This
ECO has not been performed.
C01 – Programmable Thermostat Upgrade
Installed as planned. See Section 5.2 for updated cost information. Note: The savings on this ECO relies
on proper HVAC scheduling. If the settings are tampered with, the savings will not be realized.
E01 – T-8 Lighting Upgrade
Installed as planned in the City Office Building. See Section 5.2 for updated cost information. This ECO
was added to the Maintenance Building later in the engineering process, and variation in fixture sizes was
noted during the installation process. Only 2 of the T-8 fixtures were replaced in this building due to
unexpected variation in fixture sizes. Additional 4 foot T-8 fixtures have been left in the possession of the
City Maintenance Facilitator.
E02 – Occupancy Sensors
Occupancy sensors could not be installed in the Village of Nikolai due to the lack of grounding wires in
the City Office Building. Occupancy Sensors require ground wire for operation. The sensors were left in
the possession of the City Maintenance Facilitator.
Alaskan Village Post Installation Report Energy Audit of City Buildings
Ameresco VEEP Audit - City of Nikolai
Page 10 Nikolai, AK
E03 – LED Street Lights
The LED Street Light ECO was added to the project after additional funding was reallocated from the
deletion of the Thermal Insulation Upgrade ECO. See Section 5.2 for cost and expected savings
information.
55..22 FFUUNNDDIINNGG AALLLLOOCCAATTIIOONN SSUUMMMMAARRYY TTAABBLLEESS
VEEP ECOS - PROJECT COSTS & EXPECTED SAVINGS - NIKOLAI
ECO Materials Savings SPB
B01 - WEATHERSTRIPPING - NOT INSTALLED $ 739.30 N/A N/A
C01 - PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT UPGRADE $ 8,393.21 $ 982.20 8.55
E01 - T8 LIGHTING UPGRADE $ 15,128.91 $ 355.21 42.59
E02 - OCCUPANCY SENSORS - NOT INSTALLED $ 1,683.09 N/A N/A
E03 - STREET LIGHTING UPGRADE $ 48,664.94 $ 1,752.41 27.77
AVAILABLE FUNDING $ 390.55
* Available funding covers remaining project close out expenses.
TOTAL $ 75,000.00 $ 3,089.81 23.36
APPENDIX A
VEEP PROJECT COSTS
& EXPECTED SAVINGS
B01 - WEATHERSTRIPPING - DELIVERED, NOT INSTALLED
Building # of
Doors
Price Per
Door Total Cost
Electric
kWh
Savings
Fuel
mmBtu
Savings
Total
mmBtu
Savings
Equivalent
Fuel Gallons
Savings
Annual
kWh Cost
Savings
Annual
Equivalent
Fuel Cost
Savings
Total
Annual
Savings
Simple
Payback
City Office 5
Varies
w/Size $739.30 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
C01 - PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT UPGRADE
Building
# of
Thermo-
stats
Installed
Cost Per
Thermosta
t
Total Cost
Electric
kWh
Savings
Fuel
mmBtu
Savings
Total
mmBtu
Savings
Equivalent
Fuel Gallons
Savings
Annual
kWh Cost
Savings
Annual
Equivalent
Fuel Cost
Savings
Total
Annual
Savings
Simple
Payback
City Office 2 $4,196.60 $8,393.21 0.00 18.33 18.33 130.96 $0.00 $982.20 $982.20 8.55
E01 - T8 LIGHTING UPGRADE
Building # of
Fixtures
Price Per
Fixture Total Cost
Electric
kWh
Savings
Electric
kW
Savings
Equivalen
t mmBtu
Savings
Equivalent
Fuel Gallons
Savings
Annual
kWh Cost
Savings
Annual
Equivalent
Fuel Cost
Savings
Total
Annual
Savings
Simple
Payback
City Office 51
Varies w/#
of lamps $14,558.01 1,633.63 13.46 5.58 118.55 $352.54 $889.13 $1,241.67 41.29
Maintenance 2
Varies w/#
of lamps $570.90 12.38 0.27 0.04 0.90 $2.67 $6.74 $9.41 213.76
E02 - INSTALL OCCUPANCY SENSORS - NOT INSTALLED
Building # of
Fixtures
Price Per
Fixture Total Cost
Electric
kWh
Savings
Electric
kW
Savings
Equivalen
t mmBtu
Savings
Equivalent
Fuel Gallons
Savings
Annual
kWh Cost
Savings
Annual
Equivalent
Fuel Cost
Savings
Total
Annual
Savings
Simple
Payback
City Office 2
Varies
w/Type and
Location $1,683.09 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
E03 - STREET LIGHTING UPGRADE - QTY 18
Building Existing
Fixture
Retrofit
Fixture Total Cost
Electric
kWh
Savings
Electric
kW
Savings
Equivalen
t mmBtu
Savings
Equivalent
Fuel Gallons
Savings
Annual
kWh Cost
Savings
Annual
Equivalent
Fuel Cost
Savings
Total
Annual
Savings
Simple
Payback
Whole Village 150W HPS 47W LED $48,664.94 8,120.52 22.25 27.72 589.30 $1,752.41 $4,419.73 $6,172.14 27.77
Note: The reported simple paybacks are based on the type of ECO listed. For example, electrical ECOs only use the Annual kWh Cost Savings column to
calculate the SPB, even though the Annual Equivalent Fuel Cost Savings is still reported.
*Note: This ECO was not installed, so only materials cost information has been reported.
*Note: This ECO was not installed, so only materials cost information has been reported.
APPENDIX A - VEEP PROJECT COSTS & EXPECTED SAVINGS - NIKOLAI
APPENDIX B
EQUATIONS USED IN
CALCULATIONS
ECO Equations
B01 1. Door Leakage Area (in2) = Door Area x Door Leakage Factor
2. Specific Infiltration (CFM/in2) = [ (Stack Coefficient x ∆T) + (Wind Coefficient x [Wind Speed]2 )]1/2
3. ∆T = Heating Setpoint Temp - Bin Temp
4. Air Infiltration (CFM) = Specific Infiltration x Door Leakage Area
5. Heat Loss Rate (Btu/hr) = 1.08 x Air Infiltration x ∆T
6. Heating Load (mmBtu) = Heat Loss Rate x Bin Hours / 1,000,000
7. Energy Savings = Baseline - Proposed
Note: This ECO was completed using the RETscreen program.
B02 Note: This ECO was completed using the RETscreen program.
Inputs are R-values reported in the appendices as well as the insulation square footage.
C01 Note: This ECO is based on bin data, occupancy, heating peak loads, boiler efficiency, and an assumed night setback.
Baseline Usage = (Peak Load x Occupied Load Profile x All Hours) / Boiler Eff.
ECM Usage = [(Peak Load x Occupied Load Profile x Occupied Hours)
+ (Peak Load x Unoccupied Load Profile x Unoccupied Hours)] / Boiler Eff.
mmBtu Saved = Baseline Usage - ECM Usage
E01 1. Baseline Demand (kW) = (Existing Fixture Wattage) x (Qty) X (12 Months) / (1,000)
2. Baseline Usage (kWh) = (Baseline Demand) x (Fixture Hours)
3. Proposed Demand (kW) = (Proposed Fixture Wattage) x (Qty) X (12 Months) / (1,000)
4. Proposed Usage (kWh) = (Proposed Demand) x (Fixture Hours)
5. Annual Energy Savings = (Baseline Energy Usage) - (Proposed Energy Usage)
6. Annual Cost Savings = (Energy Savings) x (Energy Cost)
E03 1. Baseline Usage (kWh) = (Existing Fixture Wattage) x (Qty) x (Existing Hours) / (1,000)
2. Proposed Usage (kWh) = (Existing Fixture Wattage) x (Qty) x [(Existing Hours) - (Hours Reduced)] / (1,000)
3. Annual Energy Savings = (Baseline Energy Usage) - (Proposed Energy Usage)
4. Annual Cost Savings = (Energy Savings) x (Energy Cost)
APPENDIX B - EQUATIONS USED IN CALCULATIONS - NIKOLAI
From the Energy Management Handbook, Turner, 4th Edition Table 13.8 p361
Savings from installing occupancy sensors are as follows:
Offices (Private) 25-50%
Offices (Open Spaces) 20-25%
Rest Rooms 30-75%
Corridors 30-40%
Storage Areas 45-65%
Meeting Rooms 45-65%
Conference Rooms 45-65%
Warehouses 50-75%
Load factor assumed to be 80% except in some cases. Vacuum pumps assumed 100% load factor.
Diversity factor assumed to be 95%.
Building
Characteristics Space Heat Cool Ventilation
Education 32.8 4.8 1.6
Food sales 27.5 13.4 4.4
Food service 30.9 19.5 5.3
Health care 55.2 9.9 7.2
Lodging 22.7 8.1 1.7
Mercantile and service 30.6 5.8 2.5
Office 24.3 9.1 5.2
Public assembly 53.6 6.3 3.5
Public order and safety 27.8 6.1 2.3
Religious worship 23.7 1.9 0.9
Storage/Warehouse 15.7 0.9 0.3
Vacant 11.9 0.6 0.3
Energy End-Use (1,000 Btu/ft2-yr)
FOR E02 - Hours Reduced
Tables 2A and 2B - 1995 Commercial Building Energy Consumption
2003 ASHRAE Applications Handbook, Chapter 35
APPENDIX C
POST INSTALLATION
PHOTOS
APPENDIX C – POST INSTALLATION PHOTOS - NIKOLAI
LED Street Light Installation LED Street Light Installation – Second View
Programmable Thermostat Installation