Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AEA Board Meeting Aug 8 2003
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority Alaska Energy Authority AGENDA ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY Board of Directors August 8,2003 Anchorage,Alaska 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROLL CALL 3.PUBLIC ROLL CALL 4.PUBLIC COMMENTS 5.PRIOR MINUTES -June 30,2003 6.OLD BUSINESS 7.NEW BUSINESS 8.DIRECTOR COMMENTS A.Director's Status Report of AEA Programs and Projects e Bulk Fuel Program B.Next Meeting Date -Follows AIDEA Board meeting Dates 9.BOARD COMMENTS 10.ADJOURNMENT H:\Ali\bfuglestad\BOARD\Agenda AEA.doc 813 West Northern Lights Boulevard *Anchorage,Alaska 99503 907 /269-3000 *FAX 907 /269-3044 »Toll Free (ALASKA ONLY)888 /300-8534 *www.aidea.org Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority Alaska Energy Authority ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS August 8,2003 -11:00 a.m. Anchorage and Juneau,Alaska Teleconference 1.CALL TO ORDER Chairman Barry called the meeting of the Alaska Energy Authority to order on August 8,2003,at 11:00 a.m.A quorum was established. 2.BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROLL CALL Directors present in Anchorage:Mr.Mike Barry (Chairman/Public Member),Commissioner Mike Barton (Department of Transportation and Public Facilities),Mr.John Winther (Public Member), and Commissioner Edgar Blatchford (Department of Community and Economic Development). Directors present in Juneau:Deputy Commissioner Tom Boutin (Designee for Department of Revenue). 3.PUBLIC ROLL CALL Staff present in Anchorage:Ronald W.Miller (Executive Director),James A.McMillan (Deputy Director-Credit),Valorie Walker (Deputy Director-Finance),Brenda J.Fuglestad (Administrative Manager),Sara Fisher-Goad (Financial Analyst),Lynn Kenney (Development Specialist),Mike Harper (Deputy Director-Energy),Chris Mello (Program Manager),and Reuben Loewen (Project Manager). Others attending in Anchorage:Brian Bjorkquist and Mike Mitchell (Department of Law),Mark Foster (Consultant). 4.PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5.PRIOR MINUTES -June 30,2003 The June 30,2003 minutes were approved as presented. 6.OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 813 West Northern Lights Boulevard *Anchorage,Alaska 99503 NAT EP NEMD WANN «CAV ANT PALA WANAA 2 TUAEL PAL A CIZA PRRTENA OOO SIAN aArAA 7.08 A.on AEA Board Meeting :August 8,2003 Meeting Minutes Page 2 7.NEW BUSINESS Mr.Miller said he emailed the Board members a copy of a Memorandum of Agreement between the Denali Commission,the Alaska Energy Authority and the Regulatory Commission of Alaska regarding Sustainability of Rural Power Systems. Chairman Barry said a meeting took place with the Denali Commission and the purpose of the memorandum is to set in place a process for dealing with the utilities that are failing to meet their obligations under the program.Chairman Barry recommended that the Board support this agreement. MOTION:Commissioner Barton moved to authorize the execution of the Memorandum of Agreement regarding Sustainability of Rural Power Systems between the Alaska Energy Authority,the Denali Commission,and the Regulatory Commission of Alaska. Mr.Winther seconded the motion.There being no discussion,the question was called.A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed with Messrs.Blatchford,Boutin,Barry, Winther,and Barton voting yea. 8A.__Director's Status Report of AEA Programs and Projects Mr.Harper briefed the Board as to the draft energy plan that is being circulated to communities around the state for comment. In response to Board questions,Mr.Harper said there is consideration for fuel cells in the rural areas of Alaska;however it is not something that has progressed significantly.He said that staff is waiting to see the results of Chugach Electric's fuel cell project before going forward. Chairman Barry commented that the Federal Administration is facing a national energy policy on fuel cells.He said that it would seem that in a rural area a fuel cell would make more sense than in an urban area where there is lesser costs. e Bulk Fuel Program Mr.Mello gave the Board a brief history of the Bulk Fuel Upgrade Program.He said the program evolved through the oil pollution act of 1990 after which compliance standards were issued.The United States Coast Guard and the Environmental Protection Agency agreed to a moratorium on the enforcement of the compliance standards,as many of the tank farms throughout rural Alaska were out of compliance and the villages lacked the funding to address the problems.During this moratorium,a program was developed to assist rural Alaska in bringing their tank farms into compliance.From this program the Bulk Fuel Upgrade Program came into existence,which provides the financial support needed to construct consolidated,code compliant bulk fuel tank farms. The primary source of funding for the program comes from Denali Commission grants.As such, AEA works in partnership with the Denali Commission to complete the construction of bulk fuel tank farms. Mr.Mello said that staff is currently managing 49 bulk fuel upgrade projects.He directed the Board to their packets for detailed information on the total cost of the completed and scheduled bulk fuel projects. AEA Board Meeting August 8,2003 Meeting Minutes Page 3 In response to Board questions,Mr.Mello said the Buckland project started before business plans were required and has incurred cost overruns. He said there is no minimum size required for a project as long as the community is capable of passing a resolution that is viable.Discussions ensued as to the various sizes of the projects and the Denali Commission's investment criteria. Mr.Harper said that staff is exploring the use of remote monitoring for the tank farms. Discussions ensued with respect to reducing duplication of infrastructure when communities are close in proximity.Mr.Harper said the subject was broached in the community of Manakotak whereby they would be added to the Dillingham grid,but the community of Manakotak vetoed that idea.He said staff would continue to look for ways to consolidate either by road or by grid. Mr.Miller informed the Board that staff is still waiting for the final formation of the Energy Policy Task Force. He said that staff would begin discussions with Mananuska Electric Association (MEA)regarding extension of the transmission services agreement for use of the Tealand-Douglas transmission line until the parallel line is complete.In conjunction,staff will also begin discussions with the other railbelt utilities regarding the Alaska Intertie and problems that have been identified in the existing agreements. Chairman Barry said to advise the utilities that if we do not see progress we will have no choice but to cancel the Intertie Agreement. 8B.NEXT MEETING DATE The board would be polled as to the next board meeting date. 9.BOARD COMMENTS There were no Board member comments. 10.ADJOURNMENT There being no objection and no further business of the Board,the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 Row Miller,Secretary AEA olis/aco3 ff to!F7 ann/wr °5)Minutes fits deeind-Maha Foihens tarUpraninnee GA =preetn tlic ie hips etnJebx.sad ExLucey LaeSABLEmethoBIOte.lie, we ='te ¥sbdcote peayle_x»hs. LA.d-hind -pete cei - Alaska industrial Development and Export Authority Alaska Energy Authority ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS June 30,2003 -10:00 a.m. Anchorage and Juneau,Alaska Teleconference 1.CALL TO ORDER Chairman Barry called the meeting of the Alaska Energy Authority to order on June 30,2003,at 11:25 a.m.A quorum was established. 2.BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROLL CALL Directors present in Anchorage:Mr.Mike Barry (Chairman/Public Member),and Deputy Commissioner Bill Noll (Designee for Department of Community and Economic Development). Directors present in Juneau:Deputy Commissioner Tom Boutin (Designee for Department of Revenue),and Commissioner Mike Barton (Department of Transportation and Public Facilities). O 3.PUBLIC ROLL CALL Staff present in Anchorage:Ronald W.Miller (Executive Director),James A.McMillan (Deputy Director-Credit),Valorie Walker (Deputy Director-Finance),Brenda J.Fuglestad (Administrative Manager),Karl Reiche (Projects Development Manager),Sara Fisher-Goad (Financial Analyst), Lynn Kenney (Development Specialist),Art Copoulos (Project Manager),and Mike Harper (Deputy Director-Energy). Others attending in Anchorage:Mike Mitchell (Department of Law),Keith Laufer (Foster Pepper Rubini &Reeves),John Winther (public),Wesley Loy (Anchorage Daily News),Tim Bradner (Alaska Economic Report),and T.N.Obermeyer (self). Others attending in Juneau:Don Kubley (Alaska International Marketing). 4.PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms.Obermeyer handed out three items.She commented about the permanent fund board and Mr. Wohlforth.She informed the Board that she was jailed last Thursday.She stated her husband istakinghis28"Alaska Bar Exam July 29"through 31%. 5.PRIOR MINUTES --January 30,2003 The January 30,2003 minutes were approved as presented. O 6.OLD BUSINESSTherewasnooldbusiness. 813 West Northern Lights Boulevard *Anchorage,Alaska 99503ANT49E0ANNNDzACAVANTSVENANAA«2 TAI Fone FAL ACIZA PNR HIAN RIND PANAMA NEN -o 8 AEA Board Meeting June 30,2003 Meeting Minutes Page 2 7.NEW BUSINESS 7A.Resolution No.2003-02,Resolution of the Alaska Energy Authority Relating to the Appointment of a Member to the Alaska Energy Policy Task Force Mr.Miller reviewed Resolution No.2003-02 stating the Legislature passed HCR 21 which created the Alaska Energy Policy Task Force.One of the members of the task force is to come from the Board of the Alaska Energy Authority,and that member is to be chosen by the AEA Board.He also stated that the interim staff member for the Task Force is Becky Gay from Representative Harris'office and she will reside at the Authority's offices. Chairman Barry advised that the task member would need to be elected at this time.He opened the floor for nominations for this position. Deputy Commissioner Noll nominated Mike Barry as a member of the task force. MOTION:Mr.Barton moved to close the nominations.Seconded by Deputy Commissioner Noll.There being no discussion and no objection,Mr.Barry was elected as a member of the Alaska Energy Task Force Committee with Messrs.Bartin,Boutin, and Noll voting yea with Mr.Barry abstaining. 8A.__Director's Status Report of AEA Programs and Projects e Alaska Intertie Project Mr.Miller stated that Matanuska Electric Association (MEA)gave notice to AEA in May that they would not extend the current Transmission Service Agreement (TSA)for the Teeland to Douglas portion of the Alaska Intertie,which is set to expire June 30,2004.AEA received $20,300,000 from the Legislature for upgrades to the Alaska Intertie.A portion of the upgrade work entails a feasibility study for a parallel line from Teeland to Douglas.Dryden and LaRue should be completing that feasibility study in September,which would look at four separate routes for this portion of the line.He said a letter was sent to MEA suggesting that an interim extension based on the current TSA be entered into which would cover the period of June 30,2004 until the new line is completed.Staff expects to meet with members of the Intertie Operating Committee in the near future to discuss that proposal and any other options that MEA may have.Staff has also identified a number of deficiencies in the current agreement with regardto the operations,maintenance,and upgrading of the Intertie. Mr.Copoulos said that AEA has the authority to terminate the Intertie Agreement when it determines that such action is required to improve power systems serving the Alaska Railbelt Utilities.If a termination notice were issued,this would give all parties four years to negotiate a new intertie agreement that would address the defects found in the current agreement. In response to Board questions,Mr.Miller said that MEA stated their reason for not extending the agreement is that they wanted to maintain maximum flexibility for current and future-operating plans.They did,however,express an interest in working with AEA on right-of-way issues related to the construction of the new line.MEA is aware that the new line cannot be in place by June 30, 2004. The Board urged staff to take the necessary action to maintain the integrity of the Alaska Intertie including the 19-mile stretch through MEA's line,even if such action would require going before the Regulatory Commission of Alaska to have them intervene and order the line be made available. AEA Board Meeting June 30,2003 Meeting Minutes Page 3 The line is an integral part of the energy needs for the entire railbelt.The Board directed staff to be proactive with this issue. Commissioner Barton reiterated the need for the Alaska Intertie to be maintained. Chairman Barry stated that it is not necessary for the Board to take any action on the issue at this time. Mr.Copoulos stated that the Intertie Operating Agreement is between AEA and all of the utilities that govern maintenance,operation and budgeting.He stated that one problem is that there is no fund set up in the agreement for capital improvements and repairs on the intertie.The intertie has been operating since 1985 without a capital fund.Since the line has been in operation for approximately 15-20 years,there are a number of items that are in significant need of capital repair,and a number of studies that must be completed with regard to system stability and reliability. There are other issues that relate to the spinning reserves.Spinning reserves are backup reserves that are available at a moments notice as the demand changes on the line.The Intertie Agreement governs how the spinning reserves are allocated amongst the utilities.Currently,there is a dispute as to how those spinning reserves are allocated and some question about whether current practice is consistent with what was agreed to in the Intertie Agreement.Resolutions have also been brought before the Intertie Operating Committee to try to resolve the issues related to spinning reserves,however,the resolutions have ended in deadlock and as a result the problem is unresolved. Chairman Barry stated that due to the age of these various agreements it would be appropriate that somebody review them and possibly take a look at a new agreement. Mr.Copoulos stated that one utility has proposed changes and ways to develop a capital fund for the existing agreement;however,that effort has failed up to this point. The Board instructed staff to explore whether or not it would be appropriate to terminate the Intertie Agreement.Staff was instructed to look into this aspect and bring the issue back before the Board with a recommendation. ¢Southeast Intertie Mr.Miller stated the backers of the Southeast Intertie are seeking federal funds.There is interest for AIDEA or AEA to serve as a pass-through vehicle for any federal funds they get for that project. e Swan-Tyee Intertie Mr.Miller stated the construction project is moving forward.There is approximately $20 million in State funds available for this project. Ms.Fisher-Goad stated there is $20 million available in state reimbursements through HB528 that passed the last legislature.There were some projects that the Legislature funded this current year, however,all but one was vetoed for the debt reimbursement. e Kake-Petersburg Mr.Miller stated they are in Phase 2 of the feasibility study for this portion of the project. AEA Board Meeting June 30,2003 Meeting Minutes Page 4 e AEA Programs Chairman Barry stated that staff should be prepared to brief the Board on one AEA program per meeting. 8B.NEXT MEETING DATE The next meeting date was set for August 8,2003,and would follow the AIDEA Board meeting. 9.BOARD COMMENTS There were no Board member comments. 10.ADJOURNMENT There being no objection and no further business of the Board,the meeting was adjourned at 11:51 a.m. JAMAL Ren Miller,Secretary newAlaskatEn Autho?ifs ini.sats ;soeAugist8h#gh -¥aeeegfetiinsbsaiePeteTimarelee es, AIDEA/AFAs =Alecks tnargy Autrority Alaska Energy Authority Rural Energy Group ¢Bulk Fuel Upgrade (BFU)Program -Upgrading Bulk Fuel Facilities throughout Rural Alaska e Rural Power System Upgrade (RPSU)Program Upgrading Rural Power Systems throughout Rural Alaska ¢Alternative Energy &Energy Efficiency (AE&EE) -Cost Reduction/Hydro/Interties/Wind/Biomass e Training -AEA Training Program -Workforce Training e PCE Program Aludes lnchatial OevalopmentandExport Rural Energy Group Bulk Fuel Upgrade (BFU)Program | July 2003 Projects Projects Total Completed Scheduled Value Pre-2001 24 $23.7 2001 8 | $14.3 2002 8 $13.6 2003 14 $23.5 2004 16 $27.1 Post 2004 101 Villages Alggks industrial Development and Aut Alaska Energy AuthorityAIDEA/AEA -| Bulk Fuel Upgrade (BFU)Program Rural Energy Group Project Costs by Year Kiana 2001 $2,904,320 Noorvik 2001 $1,948,690 Old Harbor 2001 $40,892 Kotlik 2001 $3,848,361 Napaskiak 2001 $1,399,723 Manokotak 2001 $2,113,579 Port Graham 2001 $973,554 Chignik Lagoon 2001 $1,091,196 Total $14,320,315 Alecks industrial Oevekapment ardAIDEAVAEAN---|- Rural Energy Group Bulk Fuel Upgrade (BFU)Program Project Costs by Year Kongiganak 2002 $4,141,436 Nunam Iqua 2002 $153,524 Arctic Village 2002 $2,086,931 Tanana 2002 $2,520,172 Saint George 2002 $892 Nikolski 2002 $1,017,760 Chignik Bay 2002 $2,280,673 Port Heiden 2002 $1,349,326 Total $13,550,714 Abaks Wuhairial Oevelupmert and Export AuthorityAIDEA/AEAy- -Aluka Gnargy Authority Bulk Fuel Upgrade (BFU)Program Rural Energy Group Project Costs by Year Allakaket 2003 $1,860,000 Chenega Bay 2003 $1,270,120 Egegik 2003 $481,763 Lime Village 2003 $883,347 Takotna 2003 $1,191,533 Nikolai 2003 $1,934,950 Buckland 2003 $5,149,622 Alatna 2003 $636,172 Igiugig 2003 $1,384,074 Kokhanok 2003 $1,449,314 Aleknagik 2003 $812,310 Golovin 2003 2,350,000 White Mountain 2003 $3,100,000 Akhiok 2003 $988,331 Total $23,491,536 Alaska Industrial DevelopmentandExportAvtharityAIDEA/AEA>-->-Alsstca trargy Asthor'ty Bulk Fuel Upgrade (BFU)Program Rural Energy Group Project Costs by Year Larsen Bay 2004 $2.0 Chalkyitsik 2004 $0.8 Pedro Bay 2004 $1.2 Akiachak 2004 $4.6 Deering 2004 $3.6 Chuathbaluk 2004 $1.0 Koyukuk 2004 $1.9 Newhalen 2004 $1.2 Newtok 2004 $1.0 Akutan 2004 $1.2 False Pass 2004 $0.9 Nelson Lagoon 2004 $2.4 Diomede 2004 $2.5 Beaver 2004 $1.0 Hoonah 2004 $0.8 Bettles 2004 $1.0 Total $27.1 |DEA:AFA vontAlaskatrmrgyAuthority Chignik Bay Bulk Fuel Upgrade Project Before and After Pictures ae4-4aA :wi.ByteBMMAgeeywa Sat Bulk Fuel Upgrade Program -July 2003 Background In the early 1990s,many rural communities faced the very real threat that they would no longer be allowed to take delivery of fuel in bulk because of the poor condition of their fuel storage tank farms,many of which were constructed 20 or more years earlier.The United States Coast Guard issued violation notices to many rural communities for having poorly maintained and leaking tank farms (many of these violations mandated payments that reached the tens of thousands of dollars range).This prompted Senator Ted Stevens to include bulk fuel tank farms as a priority when he created the federally funded Denali Commission to oversee rural infrastructure development. In the effort to identify and prioritize fuel storage upgrade needs,the former Alaska Division of Energy conducted a two-year assessment of 171 off-road rural communities in the late 1990's. The outcome of that survey became known as the Bulk Fuel Deficiency List,which numerically ranks communities from the poorly maintained sites to the relatively well-maintained tank farms. Communities willing to participate in the bulk fuel upgrade program receive financial and technical assistance.Currently,this Bulk Fuel Deficiency List is being used to determine the order in which communities receive upgrades,but only after applying and passing the eligibility criteria established through several Denali Commission policies (see attached Deficiency Rankings for status). The Division of Energy's programs were transferred to the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)in 1999.AEA,in partnership with the Denali Commission,works to improve rural area power systems and bulk fuel storage facilities,and also helps to ensure that communities receiving upgrades have a long-term plan for sustainability.One way in which AEA works toward this goal of sustainability is with its Bulk Fuel Upgrade Program (BFU). Many existing rural fuel facilities are not in compliance with current codes and pose a significant threat to public safety and the environment.The BFU provides the financial support needed to construct consolidated,code compliant bulk fuel tank farms.The state's draft Energy Plan calls for prompt construction of new code compliant bulk fuel tanks in 171 villages throughout Rural Alaska.AEA,in partnership with the Denali Commission,is completing the fourth full year of construction of bulk fuel tank farms.This program is dependent upon Denali Commission grants as the primary source of funding. Denali Commission Partnership Existing within the Denali Commission (DC)Act of 1998 is Sec.307.Special Functions,(b)Bulk Fuels,which states that: "The Commission,in conjunction with the Commandant of the Coast Guard,shall develop a plan to provide for the repair or replacement of bulk fuel storage tanks in Alaska that are not in compliance with applicable-- (1)Federal Law,including the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (104 Stat.484);or (2)State law.” Other Methods of Funding Financial awards from the U.S.Housing and Urban Development (HUD)and direct appropriations from the Alaska State Legislature are also managed by AEA on behalf of project recipients.Projects receive local financial and in-kind contributions from the beneficiaries wherever possible. Current Status AEA's Rural Energy Group is currently managing 49 bulk fuel upgrade projects.We also provide bulk fuel technical assistance and limited tank farm repairs to rural villages if funding is available. Sixteen bulk fuel projects have been completed in the calendar years 2001 and 2002 for a total cost of $27.8 million.Fourteen bulk fuel projects are scheduled for completion this calendar year for a total projected cost of $23.5 million.Sixteen bulk fuel projects are scheduled for completion in 2004 for a total projected cost of $27.1 million.Current funding for the 2004 projects is $11.9 million.The balance of funding for these projects will be requested from the Denali Commission in the fall of 2003. Additional Information on the Phases of a Tank Farm Project and Consultants Used Three Phases of a Tank Farm Project New tank farms are funded,designed,and constructed in three phases:Phase 1,Conceptual Design;Phase 2,Final Design;and Phase 3,Construction.All three phases including completion of construction can take anywhere from two to three years. It is important to note that a Business Plan requirement has been added to the Phase 2 development process.The Business Plan must be executed by all parties,including the Denali Commission,before Phase 3 funding is authorized. During the three phases of the project,AEA personnel and consultants produce designs, address constructability issues,and take into consideration the Denali Commission policies to build the best possible facility. Multi Disciplined Engineering Services (Design) The design consultants provide design services on an as-needed basis throughout the three phases of the project.AEA requests a project-specific proposal from one or more of the selected consultants.The consultant responds with a project-specific proposal including a budget for services,project schedule,and a list of consultant's personnel and sub-consultants who are available for the project.The consultant does not begin working until the terms of the proposal have been accepted and a Notice to Proceed (NTP)has been issued by AEA.The consultants must be familiar with rural Alaska travel and living conditions. Construction Management Services The construction managers (CM's)provide professional services on an as-needed basis and may use sub-consultants and sub-contractors to provide some of the services requested.Upon request by an AEA Project Manager (PM),the CM will provide a project-specific fee proposal. AEA does request that a CM provide both pre-construction and construction phase services. Services for each project are authorized by an NTP.NTP's authorize payment of the CM's fee and any materials,equipment,transportation or labor procured by the CM for use on the project. Training and Local Hire Although not required,it is beneficial for the CM to have an established trade training program. AEA takes into consideration the CM's capability and their plans to provide such training. Training programs must be funded independently and not as a billable expense to AEA.Skilled training may include,but is not limited to,certified pipe welding,truck-driving,heavy equipment operation,electrical,supervisory,and management training. AEA emphasizes local hire;however,workers with specialized skills,such as superintendents and certified pipe welders,are brought in from outside the community if they are not available localiy. Community Points Nelson Lagoon =133.3 Akutan 69.6 Holy Cross "AVEC:43.0 Nikolai az 127.5 Piatinum HOLD!69.5 Tuluksak UNA 42.7 Nikolski DONE 127.1 Stebbins 'AVEC:69.1 Ruby UN,42.5 Arctic Village DONE 122.9 Igiugig P 69.0 Ekwok UN,41.8 Kottik 121.7 Newhalen 2 68.1 Gustavus UNA 41.7 Chignik Bay 119.4 Port Heiden DONE 67.7 Port Lions UNA 40.0 Chalkyitsik 119.4 Shageluk JAVEC?67.5 McGrath UNA':39.6 Beaver 116.1 Kiana *DONE 67.4 Pelican UN.39.5 Venetie 115.1 Kiana "AVEC,Pilot Station *DONE 39.4 Rampart 115.0 Emmonak *DONE 67.3 Pilot Station AVEC Saint George DONE 114.1 Emmonak AVEC.Napakiak DN.38.9 Aleknagik RPA 111.3 Deering Beg 67.0 Levelock UNA 37.6 Port Protection bea 110.0 Nunam Iqua DONE 67.0 Aniak UN 37.5 Noorvik *107.4 Lower Kalskag 'AVEC,66.8 Grayling *DONE 36.5 Noorvik Shishmaref 'AVEG!65.4 Grayling 'AVEC! Akhiok 106.0 Stony River 65.2 Kasaan byad 35.0 Takotna 102.9 Telida HOLD:65.0 Quinhagak *DONE 34.7 Chenega Bay 102.5 Alakanuk 'AVEC!64.9 Quinhagak 'AVEC! Red Devil 101.3 Brevig Mission AVEC!64.7 Oscarville NA 34.6 Toksook Bay 101.1 Nightmute AVEC:64.3 Golovin 33.8 Point Baker 100.0 Port Alsworth HOLD!64.0 Koliganek 33.6 Port Graham 100.0 Russian Mission 'AvECi 63.7 Nondalton HOLD!33.5 Diomede NPA 99.9 Newtok 63.3 Metlakatla Lad 33.4 Larsen Bay War 99.8 Shungnak 62.4 Kaktovik N.S.33.3 Birch Creek HOLD:98.6 Hooper Bay 62.1 Galena Dag 33.2 Old Harbor *DONE 95.6 Saint Paul 61.5 Scammon Bay *DONE 32.4 Old Harbor 'avec!False Pass 61.0 Scammon Bay AVEC;Aika 94.3 Bettles 60.6 Saint Mary's AVEC!32.1 Chignik Lagoon DONE 93.9 Pilot Point 59.5 Teller DONE 32.0 Kongiganak DONE 91.1 Coffman Cove 58.2 Shaktoolik IAVEC!31.4 Crooked Creek 91.0 Ouzinkie 58.1 Savoonga *DONE 31.2 Chevak 'AVEC!90.1 Craig 57.5 Savoonga lavec! Chignik Lake DONE 89.1 South Naknek §7.3 Wales *DONE 29.6 Tanana DONE 84.3 Tuntutuliak 57.2 Wales JAVEC! Togiak AVEC!83.7 Allakaket Ry 57.0 Ambler AVEC]29.4 Tununak 'AVEC!83.2 Unalakleet BLPR 56.0 Goodnews Bay AVEC!28.7 Upper Kalskag 'AVEC?82.6 Kaltag *DONE 55.9 Klawock 28.5 Kokhanok BLPE 81.9 Kaltag 'avec!Wainwright NS.28.3 Nulato 'AVEC!81.8 Stevens Village [Biea 55.0 Hughes pnag 26.9 Manokotak DONE 81.5 New Stuyahok -AVEC!54.9 Kwigillingok DONE 25.0 Koyukuk 80.3 Mekoryuk 'AVEC'54.9 Twin Hills Dad 24.6HusliaDONE80.0 Fort Yukon 54.9 Akiak DONE 23.5 Huslia "AVEC!Elim *DONE 54.5 Kivalina *DONE 23.3 Lime Village NPA 79.8 Elim 'aveci Kivalina iAvec! Buckland NPE 79.6 Pedro Bay NPE 54.1 Perryville Dag 20.9 Sand Point HOLD;79.0 Nunapitchuk 'AVEC:53.6 Selawik *DONE 20.1 Gambell *DONE 78.3 Thome Bay pu 53.2 Selawik AVEC! Gambelt 'AVEC!Kwethluk N 52.2 Alatna Ka 20.0KoyukAVEC:77.8 Marshall *DONE 50.3 Hoilis N.20.0 Chefornak DONE 77.7 Marshall *AVEC*Pitka's Point iAVEC*20.0 Clarks Point P 76.4 Ivanof Bay N 50.1 Port Alexander [una 17.2 Chuathbaluk ; 75.9 Elfin Cove INA 50.0 Nuiqsut NS.16.7 Kasigluk AVEC:74.3 Tenakee Springs {pn 49.5 Anaktuvuk Pass NS.15.8 Egegik Pi 74.3 Kobuk DONE 49.5 Point Lay 10.3 Nanwaiek Pi 73.0 King Cove 49.1 Point Hope 10.2 Akiachak Pp 72.3 lliamna 48.4 Hydaburg 8.2 Sleetmute 72.3 Tatitlek 48.0 Cold Bay 7.3 Napaskiak *DONE 71.7 Hoonah 2 47.4 Karluk 5.0 Noatak 'AVEC:71.6 Saint Michael AVEC!47.0 Naknek 3.6 Anvik *DONE 71.3 Seldovia NPI 47 Atqasuk 1.3 Anvik AVEC"Kipnuk N 45.6 Angoon 0.9 Mountain Village 'AVEC'70.9 Kake IN.44.9 Atmautluak DONE 0.2 White Mountain [BiBEe 70.0 Eek 'AVEG)43.9 Hyder Eyag unrated Done by AEA (DONE)39 AVEC 49,North Slope (N.S.)7 DB EKOOIGS iD nky [PnHold (HOLD)4 Project Total =189 Village Total =171 Notes:(*)denotes AVEC assigned village where AEA has completed a mojor Bulk Fuel Project. 8/4/2003 AEA Bulk Fuel Storage Priority Rankings Community Status PM AE CM YSC pre 2001 2001 2002 2003 2004 Source: Gambell DONE x 1900 $670,000 Huslia OONE x 1900 Kivalina DONE x FA 1900 $691,000 Kobuk DONE x 4900 $446,000 Pilot Station DONE xX 1900 $658,825 Savoonga DONE xX 1900 $1,009,900 Scammon Bay =DONE x 1900 $800,000 Selawik DONE x AEA FA 1900 $1,175,255 Wales OONE xX 1900 $355,500 Quinhagak DONE D LCMF FA 1900 $280,357 Nunam Iqua BONE x LCMF FA 1997 $840,000 Teller DONE x FA 1997 $587,863 Atmautiuak DONE x LCMF FA 1998 $1,416,202 Marshall DONE x FA 1998 $635,540 Kwigillingok DONE D LCMF FA 1998 $1,305,448 Akiak OONE x LCMF FA 1999 §$1,336,600 Anvik DONE x AE&E FA 1999 $924,336 Finance:Elim BONE X AESE FA 1999 $740,000 'ihe Kaltag DONE X LOMF FA 1999 $856,900 Grayling DONE D LCMF FA 1999 §$966,000 Chignik Lake DONE B AE&E FA 1999 $715,000 Chefomak DONE M URS STG 2000 §3,187,605 .Emmonak DONE M LCMF STG 2000 $2,468,486 Finance -Tuntutuliak DONE M LCMF STG 2000 $2,274,975 Finance_.. Subtotal Pre 2001 $23,671,792 Kiana DONE x AE&E 2001 $2,904,320 Finance'"Noorvik OONE x AE&E FA 2001 $1,948,690 Finance :Old Harbor DONE Xx AE&E AVEC 2001 $40,892 Finance ...Kotlik CONE M LCMF STG 2001 $3,848,361 Finance.©: Napaskiak OONE M AE&E AE&E 2001 $1,399,723 FinanceManokotakCONEBLCMFSTG=2001 $2,113,579 Finance Port Graham DONE 8 HOR CE2 2001 $973,554 Chignik Lagoon DONE B AE&E CCl 2001 $1,091,196 Subtotal 2001 $14,320,315 Kongiganak DONE M LCMF STG 2002 $4,141,436.0 Nunam Iqua (SSR)DONE M AE&E AE&E 2002 $153,524.0 Arctic Village DONE OD URS URS 2002 $2,086,931.0 Budge Tanana DONE D URS URS 2002 $2,520,172.0 Finance Saint George OONE D CE2 CE2 2002 $892.0 Finance-:- Nikolski CONE B LCMF CE2 2002 $1,017,760.0 Finarice Chignik Bay DONE B AE&E Bristol 2002 $2,280,673.0 . Port Heiden DONE B AE&E CE2 2002 $_1,349,326.0 Subtotal 2002 _$13,550,714.0 Allakaket IN PR D LCMF URS =2001 $1,860,000 Chenega Bay IN PR R LCMF STG 2003 $1,270,120 Egegik IN PR R LCMF Bristol 2003 $481,763 Lime Village IN PR R AE&E Bristol 2003 $883,347 Takotna IN PR M CRW HDL =2003 $1,191,533 Nikolai IN PR M AE&E Bristol 2003 $1,934,950 Buckland IN PR K LCMF UIC 2003 $5,149,622 Alatna IN PR D LCMF URS 2003 $636,172 igiugig IN PR D AE&E CE2 2003 $1,384,074 Kokhanok INPR D AE&E CE2 2003 $1,449,314 Aleknagik IN PR B LCMF CC)2003 $812,310 Golovin IN PR B LCMF HDL 2003 $2,350,000 White Mountain INPR B HDL STG 2003 $3,100,000 Akhiok iN PR B CRW cc!=2003 $988,331 Subtotal 2003 $23,491,536.00 Larsen Bay IN PR M LCMF URS 2004 Chailkyitsik INPR R URS 2004 Pedro Bay INPR R AE&E CE2 2004 Akiachak INPR M LCMF STG 2004 Deering IN PR M CRW STG =2004ChuathbalukINPRM2004 Koyukuk IN PR D HDL URS 2004 Newhalen IN PR D AE&E CE2 2004 Newtok INPR 0 2004 Akutan IN PR B CRW 2004 False Pass IN PR B CRW 2004 Nelson Lagoon iN PR B CE2 CE2 2004 Diomede IN PR B AE&E CCI 2004 Beaver IN PR R URS 2004 Hoonah IN PR K MWH 2004 Bettles IN PR D 2004 Sources of information: Other:Project Status Reports and/or Project Close-out Reports Finance:Total project expenditures through 07/25/03 Budget:Projected budget to completion.Project budget may be greater than current funding allocation. C:\Documents and Settings\pfuglestad\Local Settings\Temporary Intemet Files\OLKC\July 28 2003 Status Report.xis 8/1/2003 Rural Alaska Energy Plan SUMMARY -July 2003 Over the last three years,Alaska Energy Authority and its contractors have been working with rural residents,electric utilities and others to develop an overall approach for providing affordable and reliable energy to rural Alaskan communities.With support from the Denali Commission and USDA Rural Development,the planning process began by identifying the most promising ways of increasing energy reliability and decreasing costs.The current draft plan gives detailed strategies for implementing these energy options.Public opinions and comments on the Rural Alaska Energy Plan are currently being accepted until August 1,2003.The plan may be accessed via the web at http://www.aidea.org/RuralEnergyPlan.htn. In summary,the Rural Alaska Energy Plan includes the findings of the extensive research and selected recommendations to address the needs at hand.The following information highlights the key points. Findings: 1.Rural Alaska,in this energy planning report,represents a high diverse set of nearly 200 communities ranging in size from Pedro Bay with 46 people in 17 households up to Bethel with 5471 people in 1741 households. 2.The rural Alaska communities contain nearly 30,000 households with roughly 20 million square feet and a total population of 80,000 Alaskans.Those communities also have nearly 1700 community facilities (water/sewer systems,outdoor lighting,community buildings)and 600 school buildings with roughly 4.1 million square feet. 3.The rural Alaska electric utilities,schools,community facilities,and households account for about $170 million in annual electrical and heating expenditures. 4.The average rural Alaska household spent roughly 6%of its median household income on electricity and home heating,while the average Anchorage household spent roughly 3%of its median household income on electricity and home heating. 5.The average rural Alaska household consumed roughly 440 kWh per month of electricity while the average suburban Alaska household consumed roughly 700 kWh per month of electricity. 6.Retail costs of 40 cents per kWh are common in rural Alaska.After Power Cost Equalization (PCE)credits,households may be paying around 20 -25 cents per kWh.In suburban Alaska,households may be paying on the order of 10 to 15 cents per kWh. 7.Schools remain key institutional player in rural Alaska,representing as much as 1/3 of the local electric and heating energy requirements in small villages. 8.Community facilities (water/sewer systems,outdoor lighting,community buildings)are a large user of electricity in rural Alaska,representing as much as %of the electrical usage in small rural villages. 9.While the cost of fuel per kWh has declined over the past decade,the cost to the people per kWh has continued to increase.In many rural villages,the cost of fuel has fallen below 10 cents per kWh while the cost to the people is around 20 cents per kWh.The cost of capital ranges from roughly 8-12 cents per kWh. O 10.Rural utility fuel efficiency standards by themselves do not appear to have resulted in fuel efficiency gains.On the whole,utilities that met the standard continued to improve their fuel efficiency at about the same rate as those utilities that did not meet the standard. 11.Efficiency gains appear to require operations and management practices that focus on efficiency measures,basic metering and measurement of system performance,proper sizing of generation systems with loads,and the availability of capital to enable new investment in more efficient systems. Rural Energy Plan Recommendations: 1.Improve Management Incentives a.Reward utility managers who improve fuel efficiency and control people costs by allowing them to keep part of those efficiency savings within the utility. i.Extend the time period between administrative reviews of annual non-fuel cost updates from one to three years. ii.Extend the time period between administrative reviews of fuel efficiency (kWh sold per gallon)from one to three years. b.Reduce the regulatory uncertainty associated with mergers,acquisitions and new management of rural electric utilities by streamlining Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA)timelines and filing requirements for rural utility management changes and certificate transfers. c.Remove disincentives to equity capital investments in rural electric utilities by changing PCE statutes to treat return on equity as a cost eligible for reimbursement. Measure performance:"You can't manage what you don't measure”-provide funding to facilitate the installation of new cost-effective metering and monitoring of rural electric utility system efficiencies. Share management best practices:Sponsor an annual Rural Energy Conference to facilitate identification and sharing of management,operations and maintenance best practices Improve customer choice and enhance competition:Sponsor local community energy awareness meetings to help consumers understand their energy alternatives and participate in strategic planning process for local utilities Provide capital targeted at cost-effective efficiency improvements over a five-year period.Target capital to supplement and not displace existing sources of public and private sector capital. Diesel System Efficiencies ($20 million) Combined Heat and Power ($3.2 million) Wind Power ($29.1 million) End Use Efficiencies ($12.8 million) Management,Operations &Maintenance ($1.3 million)enoop Alaska Energy Authority Rural Energy Group Program Status Report August 8,2003 Bulk Fuel Upgrade Alaska Energy Authority (AEA),in partnership with the Denali Commission,works to improve rural area power systems and bulk fuel storage facilities,and also helps to ensure that communities receiving upgrades have a long-term plan for sustainability.One way in which AEA works toward this goal of sustainability is with its Bulk Fuel Upgrade Program (BFU). AEA also provides bulk fuel technical assistance and limited tank farm repairs to rural villages on an as-available basis. Current Project StatusAEA's Rural Energy Group is currently managing 49 bulk fuel upgrade projects.Sixteen bulk fuel projects have been completed in the calendar years 2001 and 2002 for a total cost of $27.8 million.Fourteen bulk fuel projects are scheduled for completion this calendar year for a total projected cost of $23.5 million.Sixteen bulk fuel projects are scheduled for completion in 2004 for a total projected cost of $27.1 million.Current funding for the 2003 projects is $11.9 million.The balance of funding for these projects will be requested from the Denali Commission in the fall of 2003. Rural Power System Upgrade AEA,in partnership with the Denali Commission,works to improve rural area power systems and bulk fuel storage facilities,and also helps to ensure that communities receiving upgrades have a long-term plan for sustainability.One way in which AEA works toward this goal of sustainability is with its Rural Power System Upgrade Program (RPSU).AEA also provides emergency power restoration,in coordination with the State Division of Emergency Services, to rural communities and manages the Circuit Rider Program. Current Project Status AEA's Rural Energy Group is currently managing 28 rural energy system upgrade projects in various stages of design and construction.Four rural power system projects were completed in calendar year 2002.Thirteen rural power system projects are scheduled for completion this calendar year for a total projected cost of $15.2 million.Fifteen rural power system projects are scheduled for completion in 2004/2005 for a total projected cost of $26.1 million. The balance of funding for these projects will be requested from the Denali Commission inthefallof2003. Emergency ServicesIncoordinationwiththeState Division of Emergency Services in1 FY2003,AEA expended $535,748 as of 8/6/03 to provide emergency power restoration services in villages Circuit Rider - RPSU also manages the Circuit Rider Program,which provides small-scale repairs,and equipment maintenance tasks in addition to on-site technical assistance to village utility staff in order to prolong the life of existing equipment,reduce the frequency of emergency power outages,and increase the safety of operations of these small systems.The Circuit Rider Program expended $134,669 in FY2003,as of 8/6/03. Alternative Energy and Energy Efficiency The Alternative Energy and Energy Efficiency (AEEE)Section of the Rural Energy Group is managing 42 projects in the areas of hydroelectric,wind,biomass,transmission and distribution,geothermal,solar,and diesel generation and end use efficiency (see Table 3A). The primary objective of the AEEE program is to lower the cost of power and heat to communities while maintaining system safety and reliability.Projects seek to increase efficiency of existing diese!power production and end use as well to develop alternatives to diesel-based energy technology.Projects are completed through grants to local utilities and communities,as well as directly by AEA staff and contractors. 2003 AEEE is currently managing 12 projects scheduled for completion in 2003.The total cost of these projects is $40,023,967.See Tables 3 A and B for details by program and project. 2004 AEEE is currently managing 27 projects scheduled for completion in 2004 or later.The totalcostoftheseprojects|is $25,581,489.See Tables 3 A and B for details by program andproject. Training In our efforts to develop and construct code compliant energy infrastructure in rural Alaska,a policy of"sustainability"is now required by the funding agency,the Denali Commission.To achieve sustainability,AEA has proposed several training programs to help assure that thiswouldoccur. 2003 In order for AEA to provide training,the Department of Labor and AEA have entered into a reimbursable services agreement (RSA),funded by the Denali Commission training fund.In FY2003,AEA expended $138,867 as of 8/6/03 for training purposes. The Training Section is managing 7 training programs that are scheduled throughout the calendar year.The training programs include: Power plant Operator TrainingThisistheentry-level course for power plant operators and provides them with the necessary skills to operate and maintain a power plant.Program content includes:theory,maintenance and troubleshooting of engines,electrical systems,and generators;introduction to electrical distribution systems;operation of diesel electric sets;control panels;paralleling generator sets;load management,fuel management;waste heat recovery;plant management;and power plant safety and industrial CPR. Advanced Power Plant Operator Training This advanced course prepares the student with the necessary knowledge and skills to diagnose and repair failures in power plants.Program content includes:review of electrical fundamentals;testing equipment;basics of computerized engine control systems;sensors and actuators;electronic signatures and waveforms;and diagnostics and testing. Bulk Fuel Operator Training This course provides students with the knowledge and skills necessary to safely operate and maintain a bulk fuel storage facility while complying with state and federal laws.Program content includes:bulk fuel storage facility construction;facility operations;tank farm inspection criteria;facility maintenance;inventory control;tank farm safety;detection of spills; and spill response planning. Utility Clerk Training This course focuses on Power Cost Equalization (PCE)reporting;Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA)reporting;how to apply for bulk fuel loans and general accounting practices that utilities can use to keep their records and reports current.Courses are planned for Anchorage as well as select hub communities. Hydro Training This course will train local operators to ensure that hydro facilities can be sustained over the long-term.Program content includes:overview of the hydro plant,including the hydrology and fuel systems;operation of all systems involved (i.e.hydro,diesel,system voltage control, and safe clearance procedures);maintenance of all systems involved (i.e.hydro,diesel, reservoir and electrical distribution system);and record keeping. Itinerant Bulk Fuel Training This course is a follow up to the bulk fuel operator training.An instructor will travel to the communities of students previously trained in the Bulk Fuel Operator Training program to provide on-site training.Training activities will include an initial physical inspection through the tank farm;identification of operation and maintenance needs;hands-on repairs and replacement of minor maintenance needs;and additional on-site training of specific facility concerns and considerations.Training on reporting requirements,if needed,will also be © provided. Spill Response TrainingThiscoursewastobeon-site in communities that have fully completed,operation-ready bulk fuel tank farms.Training will address all the DEC,US Coast Guard and EPA measures of compliance.This training assures the tank farms will be in compliance with all governing agencies.Training includesa spill response drill.AEA was unable to get all agenciescoordinatedforFY2003sotrainingcouldnotbecompleted.AEA intends to go forward with this training in the future but it will not be dependent on a multi-agency approach.A privatecontractorthatspecializesinthistypeoftrainingwillbeutilitized. 2004 At this time,6 training programs are planned for 2004.The funding required to complete these projects in 2004 is projected at $293,120.The planned programs include: Training Program Planned Sessions in FY04 1.Powerplant Operators Training 2 2.Advanced Powerplant Operators Training |1 3.Bulk Fuel Operator Training 3 4.Utility Clerk Training 2 5.Hydro Operators Training e Phase II (continuing FY2003)e Washington State location in Fall e Phase |e 1 e Phase Il e Pending Site and Logistical Changes 6.ltinerant Training 10 On-Site Power Cost Equalization The PCE Program serves a population of approximately 79,555 in 189 communities served by 89 utilities.Staff is currently reviewing proposed regulation changes by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA).Upon finalization of those changes,AEA will be conducting a review of their own regulations for proposed changes to the PCE Program.Staff will continue to monitor the program for administrative changes and improvements.PCE Utility Clerk Training facilitated by staff of AEA and RCA is offered several times per year.This training is funded by the Denali Commission and is open to all participating utilities. 2003 A $15.7 million appropriation requires an estimated annualized 85%pro-rated level of eligible costs.We are currently paying the last billing period of FY2003 at a 92%funding level. 2004 The PCE Program is estimated to cost $18.5 million in FY04 to operate the program at the statutory established level. AEA Bulk Fuel Storage Priority Rankings Community Status PM AE CM YSC pre 2001 2001 2002 2003 Gambell OONE x 1900 $670,000 Husiia DONE x 1900 Kivalina DONE x FA 1900 $691,000 Kobuk DONE x 1900 $446,000 Pilot Station DONE x 1800 $658,825 Savoonga DONE x 1900 $1,009,900 Scammon Bay DONE x 1900 $800,000 Selawik DONE x AEA FA 1900 $1,175,255WalesDONEx1900$355,500 Quinhagak DONE D LCMF FA 1900 $280,357 Nunam Iqua DONE x LCMF FA 1997 $840,000TellerDONExFA1997$587,863 Atmautiuak DONE x LCOMF FA 1998 $1,416,202MarshallDONExXFA1998$635,540 Kwigillingok DONE 1°)LCMF FA 1998 $1,305,448AkiakDONExLCMFFA1999$1,336,600AnvikDONExAE&E FA 1999 $924336 Elim DONE x AE&E FA 1999 $740,000KaltagDONExLCMFFA1899$856,900GraylingDONE9)LCMF FA 1999 $966,000ChignikLakeDONE8AE&E FA 1999 $715,000ChefornakCONEMURSSTG2000§3,187,605EmmonakDONEM LCMF STG 2000 $2,468,456 Finance Tuntutuliak DONE M LCMF STG 2000 _$2274975 Finance Sub )Pre 2001 $23,671,792 Kiana DONE x AE&E 2001 $2,904,320 Finance Noorvik DONE Xx AESE FA 2001 $1,948,690 Finance Old Harbor DONE X°AE&E AVEC 2001 $40,892 Finance Kotlik DONE M LCMF STG =2001 $3,848,361 Finance Napaskiak DONE M AE&E AE&E 2001 $1,399,723 Finance Manokotak DONE B LCMF STG =2001 $2,113,579 Finance Port Graham DONE B HDR CE2 2001 $973,554 Finance Chignik Lagoon DONE 8 AE&SE CCI 2001 $1,091,196 Finance Subtotal 2001 $14,320,315 Kongiganak DONE M LCMF STG 2002 $4,141,436.0 Finance Nunam Iqua (SSR)DONE M AE&E AE&E 2002 $153,524.0 FinanceArcticVillageponeODURSURS2002$2,086,931.0 BiscstcaTananaDONEDURSURS2002$2,520,172.0 Finance Saint George DONE o CE2 CE2 2002 $892.0 Finance Nikolski DONE B LCMF CE2 2002 $1,017,760.0 Finance Chignik Bay DONE B AE&E Bristol 2002 $2,280,673.0 Finance Port Heiden DONE B AE&E CE2 2002 $1,349,326.0 .Finance Subtotal 2002 _$13,550,714.0 Allakaket IN PR 1?)LCMF URS 2001 $1,860,000 Chenega Bay IN PR R LCMF STG 2003 $1,270,120EgegikINPRRLCMFBristol2003$481,763 Lime Village IN PR R AE&E Bristol 2003 $883,347 Takotna iN PR M CRW HDL 2003 $1,191,533NikolaiiNPRMAE&E Bristol 2003 $1,934,950 Buckland IN PR K LCMF UIC 2003 $§,149,622|Alatna IN PR D LCMF URS 2003 $636,172Igiugig_ANPR DOD AE&E CE2 2003 $1,384,074KokhanokNPR[2)AE&E CE2 2003 $1,449,314AleknagikINPR8BLCMFCCI2003$812,310 Golovin IN PR B LCMF HDL 2003 $2,350,000 White Mountain =INPR 8B HDL STG 2003 $3,100,000AkhiokINPR8CRWCCI2003$988 331 Subtotal 2003 $23,491,536.00 Larsen Bay IN PR M LCMF URS 2004 Chalkyitsik iN PR R URS 2004 Pedro Bay IN PR R AE&E CE2 2004 Akiachak INPR M LCMF STG 2004 Deering INPR M CRW STG =2004ChuathbatukINPRM2004 Koyukuk IN PR D HDL URS 2004 Newhalen INPR D AE&E CE2 2004 Newtok INPR D 2004 Akutan IN PR B CRW 2004 False Pass IN PR 8 CRW 2004 Nelson Lagoon =INPR B CE2 CE2 2004DiomedeINPR)«6B OAEBE =CCCI_C 2004 Beaver INPR R URS 2004 Hoonah IN PR K MWH 2004 Bettles NPR D 2004 Sources of information: Other:Project Status Reports and/or Project Close-out Reports Finance:Total project expenditures through 07/25/03 Budget:Projected budget to completion.Project budget may be greater than current funding allocation. BFU July 28 2003 Status Report 8/7/2003 Community oInts ommunity 'oInts ommunity Points Nelson Lagoon INPRI 133.3 Akutan Holy Cross AVEC.43.0 Nikolai UNPR;127.5 Platinum Tuluksak (UNAS,42.7 Nikolski :DONE 127.1 Stebbins Ruby sUNAS.42.5 Arctic Village |DONE 122.9 Igiugig Ekwok 'UNAS,41.8 Kotlik -DONE.421.7 Newhalen Gustavus 'UNAS:41.7 Chignik Bay DONE .119.4 Port Heiden Port Lions UNAS:40.0 Chalkyitsik [IN PRY 119.4 Shageluk McGrath 'UNAS:39.6 Beaver BNPR)116.1 Kiana *Pelican UNAS)39.5VenetieNPR;115.1 Kiana Pilot Station*DONE'39.4 Rampart 'HOLD,115.0 Emmonak *Pilot Station -AVEG: Saint George ©.DONE = 114.1 Emmonak Napakiak "UNAS,38.9 Aleknagik INPRE =111.3 Deering Levelock 'UNAS.37.6PortProtectionINPR:110.0 Nunam Iqua Aniak (UNAS,37.5 Noorvik #00.)DONE.:107.4 Lower Kalskag Grayling */2.00¢..DONE™.36.5Noorvik'AVEC:Shishmaref Grayling AVEC:Akhiok NPRi 106.0 Stony River Kasaan UNAS,35.0 Takotna INPRI 102.9 Telida Quinhagak *7)?:5:5,DONE >,34,7ChenegaBayINPRE102.5 Alakanuk Quinhagak AVEC. Red Devil INR 101.3 Brevig Mission Oscarville .4UNAS!34.6 Toksook Bay 'AVEC,=101.1 'Nightmute Golovin Point Baker LPR Port Alsworth Koliganek Port Graham.)Russian Mission Nondalton Diomede N Newtok Metlakatla Larsen Bay Shungnak Kaktovik Birch Creek 'Hooper Bay Galena JNASOldHarbor*:°|Saint Paul Scammon Bay *: Old Harbor False Pass Scammon Bay Atka Bettles Chignik Lagoon Pilot Point eee Kongiganak 2)Coffman Cove Shaktoolik Crooked Creek Ouzinkie Savoonga.* Chevak Craig Savoonga 'Chignik Lake:South Naknek Wales* 'Tanana ='Tuntutuliak 82).Wales Togiak xi Allakaket Ambler Tununak :Unalakleet Goodnews Bay Upper Kalskag AVEC:82.6 Kaltag*.Klawock Kokhanok IN,oR Kaltag Wainwright Nulato AVEC:Stevens Village Hughes Manokotak «..:New Stuyahok 'Kwigillingok ;- Koyukuk Mekoryuk 'Huslia:Fort Yukon Huslia Elim *:.5 : : Lime Village Elim Kivalina AVEC! Buckland Pedro Bay Perryville UNAS: Sand Point Nunapitchuk Selawik.*DOM Gambell.*!:7 Thorne Bay Selawik 'AVEC:Gambell 'AVEC.Kwethluk Alatna NP Koyuk AVEC;=77.8 Marshall *Hollis UNAS,. Chefornak =,Marshall Pitka's Point "AVEC:20.0 Clarks Point ivanof Bay Port Alexander [UNAS,17.2 Chuathbaluk Elfin Cove :Nuigsut N.S.16.7 Kasigiuk Tenakee Springs U Anaktuvuk Pass N.S.15.8 Egegik Kobuk?088s Point Lay N.S.10.3 Nanwalek King Cove Point Hope NS.10.2 Akiachak liamna Hydaburg TUNAS,8.2 Sleetmute Tatitlek Cold Bay (UNAS:7.3 Napaskiak *."Hoonah Karluk "UNAS!5.0 Noatak Ai Saint Michael Naknek UNAS:3.6 Anvik *.).2000002°e Seldovia Atqasuk NS.1.3 Anvik 'AVEC.Kipnuk Angoon TUNAS.0.9 Mountain Village AVEC:70.9 Kake Atmautluak ..:DONE 0.2 White Mountain §N'PRY 70.0 Eek Hyder UNAS Unrated AVEC ag.North Slope (N.S.).Unassigned (UNAS)7."88 Project Total =189 Village Totai =171 8/7/2003 (*}denotes AVEC assigned village where AEA has completed a major Bulk Fuel Project. AEA RPSU Priority Rankings with AVEC Villages Community |.Rank |D/ND Community ||Rank 'D/ND Community Rank |D/ND Koyukuk,Distr:[PH 3)ef D Quinhagak 58}_D Point Baker AP&T 117]N Koyukuk,Pwrhs.}PH 4]:4;_D Eek :59}D Port Protection |AP&T 118;D Chitina w/hydro_|PH 1 -2|N Pelican UNAS 60}N Kasaan UNAS 119;oN Hughes JPH 3}see 3)2D Deering,Dist.UNAS 62}N Kiana WED 120|N Karluk -PH 1 4]oN Lower Kalskag -621 D Kipnuk UNAS 121}D Stony River PH 1 5}_D Upper Kalskag RAVE 21 _D Noorvik '122|N Platinum.<2"{HOLDP esse 61 D Mekoryuk AY 63}D Perryville UNAS 123|N Newtok --PH 1 7|_D Northway APaT|64{N Red Devil UNAS 124]D Tuluksak::PH 3]=::8}D Toksook Bay 65}D-Ambler 125)N Golovin:38"PH 3]eese%c"9]ON Tatitlek UNAS 66|N Ekwok UNAS |126}D Telida °+FHOLD]Stee N Elfin Cove UNAS 67|N Hooper Bay -3 127|_D Crooked Creek -[PH 1 :D Kobuk UNAS 68]D Nelson Lagoon {UNAS 130]N Teller:69 -[HOLD]ee D Tununak VEC 69|D Russian Mission af 131{_D. Manokotak:2):[HOLD]==D Akhiok UNAS 70|N Tetlin AP&T 132{D Atka w/hydro -»{PH 1{>N Allakaket PH 2 7i}ON Chalkyitsik UNAS 133]D Arctic Village |PH 3]2 D Beaver UNAS 72|N Emmonak :Vy »134]ON Kwigillingok =PH 3]3 esr D Chistochina AP&T 73}D McGrath UNAS 135}N Sleetmute PH 4|-D Venetie UNAS 73,_N Saint Paul UNAS 136]oN Napakiak UNAS D Napaskiak UNAS 74,ON Sand Point UNAS 137}N Pedro Bay UNAS|_-N.Mountain Village_|75|_D Egegik UNAS 138]_N Kongiganak**°:{PH 3]>N Chuathbaluk UNAS 76|ON Elim Vie 139}N Shishmaref-*ws N Akiak UNAS 77D King Cove UNAS 140]N Nikolski ={PH1}<2 N Clarks Point UNAS 79}D Lime Village UNAS 141|2? Yakutat UNAS N tliamna UNAS 81}N Naukati AP&T 1421 ON Tenakee Springs |UNAS N Tuntutuliak,Dist.}UNAS 82}D Bettles AP&T 143}N Klukwan UNAS N Wales Ai 83 Chignik Lagoon _[UNAS 144;N Nightmute oi D Scammon Bay aE 84|D Galena UNAS 145]ON White Mtn.;Dist:':|PH 3}3%D Pilot Station AVE 85|D Kasigluk °°"AVEO!147,D Chignik Bay UNAS N Gambell ">>AYE -86 D Akutan {UNAS 149|D Igiugig UNAS N Gustavus UNAS 87}N Alakanuk Vi 150;D Ivanof Bay UNAS N Kaltag 88]D Chevak:-VEG:151}D Port Heiden PH 1 8 er N Rampart UNAS 89]N Holy Cross pais}152!D Stevens Village =:|PH 3 D Tok AP&T 90|_N New Stuyahok VEG 153]D Kokhanok?8:<|PH 3}oe ees D Coffman Cove AP&T 91)N Shageluk "=«=«fale 154,ON Atmautluak;Dist.|PH 3]-D Saint George UNAS 92|N Tanana UNAS 155!_D Akiachak -UNAS D Angoon 94;D Atmautluak,Prhs.|UNAS 156]D Larsen Bay w/hyd |UNAS N Cold Bay 95+D Levelock UNAS 156}N Nikolai UNAS D Kivalina ate 96|D Saint Michael ©-457}D Buckland 2 ==|Hold a N Metlakatla {UNAS|97]N Grayling Ay 158}D Central UNAS 38]N Minto -a 98]D Koyuk #2"ee ise (59)D Mentasta Lake _{AP&T 39]D Selawik eo":aE ==9Ol D Aniak UNAS 160}N Lake Minchumina |UNAS 40|N Shaktoolik UES 400{_N Hoonah AP&T 161]N Chefornak =":|PH1 "44;D Saint Mary's AVE 102;_N Shungnak EG 163{D False Pass UNAS 42|N Stebbins AE 403}D Koliganek UNAS 164|? Anvik :43]D Kake UNAS 104}N Chenega Bay UNAS 165}N Kwethiuk UNAS 43]D Unalakleet UNAS 105)_N Deering _DONE 166]N Healy Lake AP&T 46}N Whale Pass UNAS 106|N Manley Hot Spr.|UNAS 166}ON Ouzinkie,w/hydro |UNAS 46}N Noatak 7 107!D White Min.,Pwr.[DONE 167}_D [Eagle AP&T 47|_N Haines AP&T 108]N Tuntutuliak DONE 168}D Twin Hills UNAS 48]oN Chignik Lake UNAS 109]N Kotlik DONE 169'|D Kotlik,Dist.UNAS 49:D Hollis 110)N Nunam Iqua DONE 170}_D Goodnews Bay 50]D Huslia Nise.111]D Marshall AVES 51{_D Hydaburg _ron |112]D Brevig Mission wuss 52|D Nulato 113]N Distressed|D Fort Yukon UNAS 53]N Port Alsworth UNAS 114}N Non-distressed|N Takotna UNAS 54]N Savoonga 115]D Pilot Point UNAS 56|_N Togiak WEE 116]D Ruby UNAS 57}D Birch Creek UNAS 117]D RPSU Priority List 8/7/2003 SOURCE -DC Projects -expended as of 6/30/03 (ran on 8/6/03)LENNY's Budgeted as of Expended as of RPSU |Powerhouse/Distribution Systems 7/25/03 6/30/03 Total to Complete:{Status: PM AE CM 2002 KN AEA AEA Deering RPSU $1,120,023 $1,120,023 $0 $1,120,023!Complete KN LCMF STG/AEA |Kotlik RPSU $2,064,233 $2,062,782 $0 $2,064,233 Complete KN Nome Nome Nome RPSU $795,000 $795,000 $0 $795,000 Complete KN LCMF STG/AEA |Tuntutuliak RPSU ;$1,486,305 $1,482,728 $0 $1,486,305 |Complete Subtotal 2002:$5,465,561 $5,460,533 $5,465,561 |(Actual) 2003 KN AE&E CE2 Allakaket RPSU $550,000 $71 $0 $550,000 'In Progress KN LCMF STG/AEA |Atmautiluak RPSU $1,802,019 $401,203 $0 $1,802,019 'In Progress LL LCMF HDL/AEA |Golovin (2)RPSU $1,678,026 $429,605 $0 $1,678,026 In Progress KN AEA AEA Golovin RPSU,Distribution $253,892 $253,892 $0 $253,892 |Complete KN AE&E CE2 Kokhanok RPSU $1,285,240 $221,870 $0 $1,285,240 'In Progress KN LCMF STG/AEA:|Kongiganak RPSU $2,072,796 $1,208,155 $0 $2,072,796 In Progress KN AE&E AEA Kotlik Waste Heat $123,190 $122,924 $0 $123,190|Complete KN AEA AEA Koyukuk RPSU-Distribution $500,000 $172,026 $0 $500,000/In Progress LL LCMF STG/AEA |Kwigillingok RPSU $2,359,274 $1,668,511 $0 $2,359,274 |In Progress KN AE&E Prec.Pwr.|Nunam Iqua RPSU $7,559 $7,559 $0 $7,559 Complete KN LCMF STG/AEA {Stevens Village RPSU $2,179,305 $1,380,572 $0 $2,179,305 In Progress KN LCMF CE2/AEA |Tuluksak RPSU $2,050,391 $1,864,394 $0 $2,050,391 |In Progress KN HDL AEA White Mountain RPSU $278,000!-$27,168 $0 $278,000 'In Progress Subtotal 2003:$15,139,692 $7,757,949!$15,139,692 (Actual) 2004 - KN LCMF URS/AEA |Arctic Village RPSU $1,540,450 $546,169 $0 $1,540,450 |In Progress LL CRW Atka RPSU $195,000 $16,778 $2,100,000 $2,295,000In Design LL LCMF STG/AEA |Buckland RPSU $1,905,532 $28,144 $0 $1,905,532 Projected LL LCMF Cherfornak RPSU $195,000 $35,581 $2 $195,002 |Projected LL LCMF Chitina RPSU $195,000 $22,381 $2,000,000 $2,195,000 'Projected KN LCMF CE2/AEA jHughes RPSU $1,270,000 $633,561 $0 $1,270,000 jIn Progress KN HDL URS/AEA |Koyukuk RPSU -Powerhouse $1,495,000 $13,186 $0 $1,495,000 |Projected LL LCMF CCI/AEA |Manokotak RPSU $1,809,346 $208,253}-$0 $1,809,346 |Projected LL LCMF STG/AEA |Newtok RPSU $745,246 $163,641 $750,000 $1,495,246 Projected LL CRW Port Heiden RPSU $195,000 $8,459 $1,600,000 $1,795,000 Projected LL HDL Stony River RPSU $63,675 $55,436 $1,800,000 $1,863,675 Projected Subtotal 2004:$9,609,249 $1,731,588 $8,250,002)$17,859,251 '(Projected) 2005 LL HDL Crooked Creek RPSU $70,000 $26,057 $1,600,000 $1,670,000 |Projected KN CRW Karluk RPSU $70,000 $735 $1,600,000 $1,670,000 |Projected LL CRW Nikolski RPSU $195,000 $13,735 $1,600,000 $1,795,000 Projected KN HDL Sleetmute RPSU $74,101 $61,479 $3,000,000 $3,074,101 |Projected Subtotal 2005:$409,101 $102,005 $7,800,000 $8,209,101 |(Projected)L.Landis 7/29/2003 3A Altemative Energy andEn ___-iciency 2003 /2004 Projects Federal /AEA Loan Completion Program Projects Other State Funds Local Total Year Status Administration Denali Commission Proj Admin 164,000 164,000 . Energy Cost Reduction grant solicitation 3,075,300 3,075,300 2004-5 Release in fall 2003 Biomass Biomass Projects 339,622 131,371 470,993 Fish Oil Trial 4-Cycle 2004 Planning Rural Energy from Wood 2004 Planning Small Waste Incineration Guidebook 2003 95%complete Diesel Efficiency APC-POW Island Controis 318,918 181,082 500,000 2004 Design AVEC-Auto Controls 535,193 364,807 900,000 2003 30%complete AVEC-Diesel Generators 243,393 356,610 600,003 2003 60%complete City of Atka Heat Recovery 56,793 161,207 218,000 2004 Design Demo Fuel Cell-NPS Pass Thru*.2004 Design,procurement False Pass-Diesel Efficiency 264,700 82,200 346,900 2004 Design Galena Diesel Efficiency 262,050 87,950 350,000 2004 Design,procurement LPSD Chignik Lake Consolidation 78,414 123,496 201,910 2004 Design Metering (Remote Monitoring)*a Planning Nikolai Diesel Efficiency 265,110 163,860 ; 428,970 2004 Design Nome Diesel Efficiency 5,960,000 1,459,000 7,419,000 2004-5 Design Sitka Diesel 3,235,850 3,235,850 2003 95%complete White Mountain Heat Recovery 20,774 80,595 101,369 2004 Design End Use Efficiency ©AHFC Rebuild America RSA 50,000 50,000 400,000 2003 Complete State Energy Program Activities 176,500 35,300 211,800 2003 95%complete Village End Use Measures 694,700 694,700 2004 Planning Geothermal Statewide Geothermal Assessment 80,000 5,000 20,000 105,000 2004 =--s«Planning Hydroelectric Akutan Hydro®Planning , APC-S.Fork Hydroelectric 4,896,932 1,645,868 3,542,800 2004 Design,permitting Atka Hydro RPSU 600,000 100,000 700,000 2004 Design,permitting Gustavus Falls Creek Hydro 1,083,685 2,916,315 4,000,000 2004-6 Design,permitting Old Harbor Hydro RPSU 975,000 200,000 1,175,000 Reprogram funds Power Creek Hydro 10,665,000 11,443,000 22,108,000 2003 Complete Pyramid Creek Hydro 1,000,000 92,000 1,092,000 2004 Convert to conventional diesel project Solar Lime Village Battery Diesel Modelling 38,306 38,306 2003 Complete Trans &Dist Akiachak Distribution 15,520 15,480 31,000 2004 Design APC Haines-Chilkat intertie 1,073,644 1,073,644 Reprogram funds APC-Skagway Line Ext 247,061 197,479 444,540 2004 Procurement Calista Power Trans Eng &Permt -DC Leg Energy 1,500,000 1,500,000 2004-7 Planning Manokotak Intertie 3,760 3,760 See Manokotak RPSU Parks Hwy Line Ext.-DC Leg Energy Projs/MEA 668,105 668,105 2003 In progress,completion %not available Parks Hwy Line Ext.-DC Leg Energy Projs/GVEA 1,367,503 1,367,503 2003 In progress,completion %not available Port MacKenzie Nat.Gas Line Ext.-DC Leg Energy 250,000 250,000 2004 Conceptual design and feasibility POW-lsland Elec Trans Plan*2004 20%complete Prince of Wales Intertie 3,810,000 300,000 6,684,400 10,784,400 2003 85%complete Wind AEDTL AOC Wind Tower 80,000 80,000 2004 Altemative tower and foundation 20%complete Gambell Bird Study”2003 Collision avoidance study 100%complete Wind Energy Programs Support 85,000 25,000 15,000 125,000 2004 Baseline wind data collection,60%complete Wind Fuel-Cell 300,000 75,000 375,000 2004 Funds applied to Wales wind diesel upgrade Wind Bird protection studies,RSA ADF&G/USFWS*2004 Guidelines for reducing avian impacts TOTAL Alternative Energy 41,480,833 1,013,671 6,376,949 19,621,400 68,492,853 *Budgets not established yet Total all funding sources 8/7/2003 3:49 PM 2003 PROJECTS TABLE 3B Alternative Energy and Energy Efficiency 2003 /2004 Project Details PROGRAM ACTIVITY General Release 3 Energy Cost Reduction Grant solicitation,review proposals and make recommendations to Denali Commission. Biomass Finish guidebook to small scale waste incineration technology;initiate tests of fish oil diesel on Cat generators with Icicle Seafoods;identify host site for wood-fired district heating system demonstration. Diesel Efficiency Complete AVEC,False Pass,Galena,LPSD,fuel cell demonstration and Sitka projects.Specify standard data acquisition and control package with AVEC,UAF and other Metering project partners. End Use Complete energy auditsin 50-55 facilities in 17 communities.PerformEfficiencyenergyefficiencyretrofitsin4-6 communities. Geothermal Complete statewide resource assessment.Conceptual design and feasibility for Akutan project. Hydroelectric Complete design and permitting for South Fork,Atka,and Falls Creek projects.Close out Power Creek project after final report complete. Convert Pyramid Creek grant to conventional diesel. Solar Disseminate Lime Village battery-diesel-photovoltaic performance results and Sandia Lab model. Transmission &Complete projects in Akiakchak,Skagway,Parks Highway,and Prince of Distribution Wales Island.Complete study for extending transmission to northern Prince of Wales.Work with Calista to plan for Kuskokwim and Donlin power and with Mat-Su Borough on Pt.MacKenzie gas extension. Wind Conduct reconnaissance wind resource assessment on 100 communities. Hire contractors for onsite assessments in 30 communities. 2004 PROJECTS PROGRAM PROPOSED ACTIVITY General Award grants and loans for Energy Cost Reduction solicitation. Biomass Report on results of fish oil tests and test additional generators if resultsarepromising;design and construct biomass-fired system. Diesel Efficiency Complete APC,Atka,Nikolai,Nome,and White Mountain projects.Install _ metering equipment in 3-5 communities. End Use Perform retrofits in 50-55 facilities.Complete energy auditsin 20-25Efficiencycommunities. Geothermal Design for potential Akutan project Hydroelectric Begin construction of Atka,South Fork,and Falls Creek projects. Transmission & Distribution Continue support for Kuskokwim and Pt.MacKenzie projects. Wind Begin onsite assessments in 30+communities. TABLE 4 Training Program (Status as of June 30,2003) ;Projected Actual 2003 Program Total Funded Training Total Spent Training Lapsed Bulk Fuel Operator $72,000 30Candidates $31,373 12 $40,627 Itinerant Bulk Fuel Operator $20,400 12 Sites $5,253 4 $15,148 | )Powerplant Operator $68,840 20Candidates $51,457 18 $17,383 Advanced Powerplant Operator $24,450 10Candidates $15,042 8 $9,408 Hydro Powerplant Operator $75,188 2 Phases $23,480 1 $51,708 ? Utility Clerk $58,400 32Candidates $27,242 21 $31,158 Spill Response $51,300 ©6 Sites $-0 $51,300 2003 Total:$370,578 $153,846 $216,732 'Training just completed June 6.All bills have not been received. 2 Training just completed June 19.All bills have not been received. Total -Projected 2004 Program Requested Training Bulk Fuel Operator .$78,461.30 Itinerant Bulk Fuel Operator $18,154 10 Powerplant Operator $99,231 20 Advanced Powerplant Operator $26,154 10 Hydro Powerplant Operator $26,220 10 Utility Clerk $44,900 24 2004 Total:$293,120