Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
GVEA Healy Fairbanks Intertie Substations Comp 1994
GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC.Box 71249,Fairbanks,Alaska 99707-1249,Phone 907-452-1151 February 4,1994 'Delbert S.LaRue Dryden and LaRue,Inc. PO Box 111008 Anchorage AK 99511-1008 Re:Clarification to Request for Proposal -Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substations and Reactive Compensation In the original RFP,the following statement was made: "Please note that complete functional designs are requested,as performance type specifications will not be acceptable for the substation portion of this work." Several questions have been asked about the intent of this phrase. As clarification,material and equipment suppliers can be provided performance or conceptual specifications and,as part of their work,do design and provide shop drawings for review under this RFP.The construction contractor will not be required to engage an engineer for design and submit these designs to the Engineer for verification.Examples of acceptable performance specification production by material suppliers would be wiring diagrams by relay and panel board supplier,structural strength calculations, connection details,and material sizing for substation structures, etc.Examples of unacceptable performance specification use would be a specification calling for the construction contractor to hire an engineer to provide foundation design,lighting layout, structure requirements,ground grid design,etc.Simply put,the contractor will not be expected to provide any engineering,but will be required to provide procurement and labor to install equipment and materials which have been specified and reviewed by the engineer. One additional clarification,the Design Manual for Reactive Compensation,Section 4.4,will not be required,as the reactive compensation is anticipated to be provided as turnkey with a performance specification. Please incorporate the information in this letter into your proposals.Please call if you have any questions on this letter orotherportionsoftheRequestforProposals. Sincerely, a Steven Haagenson Manager of Engineering Services GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC.Box 71249,Fairbanks,Alaska 99707-1249,Phone 907-452-1151 February 23,1994 Tom Stahr,IPG Chairman Municipal Light and Power 1200 East First Avenue Anchorage,Alaska 99501 Recommendation on Substation and Reactive Compensation Design Proposal HEALY TO FAIRBANKS TRANSMISSION INTERTIE Dear Tom: Golden Valley Electric Association,Inc.Engineering Department requested proposals for the supply of substation and reactive compensation design services from twelve consultants.We have completed evaluation of the submitted proposals and would like to offer a recommendation for acceptance of the Power Engineers of Anchorage,Alaska and Hailey ,Idaho (Power)proposal. The attached evaluation form was created for the four proposals received to allow for a fair comparison based on experience, ability to perform,man-hour effort,and price.Of all the proposals,Power Engineers was felt to provide the best value, local experience,and realistic view of the tasks to be performed. Stanley Engineers local experience consisted of the Healy Substation in 1967,which was not felt to be current enough.There were some discrepancy in the CM /Inspection portion of the proposals due to a range of seven to 24 week constructionschedules.To even the evaluation the CM /Inspection was removed.R W Beck was very high when compared on desigi costs alone.Power Engineers was felt to have provided a realistic design price and a good balance between design and C™/Inspection. GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC. Tom Stahr Page 2 February 23,1994 The selection of Power Engineers was primarily based on the team's superior value demonstrated by their arctic experience in substation design and construction management of successful projects,local Alaskan design team with the ability to provide timely services,and realistic price.The following shows the ranking for design and construction management based on price alone: Proposer Design CM/Inspection Total Stanley Engrs.1 2 1 R W Beck/D&L 3 1 2 Power Engrs 2 3 3 Stone &Webster 4 4 4 Would you please review the evaluation forms.The Power Engineers proposal is attached for your review.If you need additional information or would like to review any other proposals,please call me at (907)451-5647.The design firms are anxiously awaiting announcement of our selection and notice to proceed to allow for commencement of work. Sincerely, APE Steven Haagenson,P.E. Manager of Engineering Services SH:mmf Enclosures HF138SVE.XLS 19-Feb-94 Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substation and Reactive Compensation General Engineering -Proposal Evaluation $ Total R Proposers General Local Schedule/Staffing Man-hours Projected Cost a Comments Experience Experience (ability to start to per proposal n of Firm By the Proposed soon and maintain Complete including 10 %k Team schedule)Project Contingency Stanley Consultants good some good 3,739 Des $333,251.00 1 [Requested removal of Section 22 Healy Sub 1967 2,440 CM $241,178.00 2 |Purchase Order Terms and Conditions from Contract 10%$57,442.90 UCC not applicable to Engineering Services Contracts Would like to incorporate applicable section 6,179 NTE $631.871.90 1 |by mutual aggreement R.W.Beck/CM Based on 2 month schecule /Good Design QA program Dryden &Larue good excellent excellent 8,283 Des $702,634.00 3 Common control building /3 purchase contracts 560 CM $52,060.00 1 /Igloo one-line ? 10%$75,469.40 Like to include PM group in fina!design 8,843 NTE $830,163.40 2 Power Engineers,Inc good good excellent 6,244 Des 71,042.00 2 Jassumed Igloo will require a generator backup 3,830 CM $302,446.00 3 [SVC and BES Specs assumed to be in 10%$77,348.80 acceptable elecronic format /1%/mo.unpaid invoices GVEA responsible for procurement 10.074 NTE $850,836.80 3.|Sub.construction 80 days,RC construction 122 days Stone and Webster Engineering Corp.good some good 14,831 Des $1,076,850.00 '4 |Proposing common control building 2,696 CM $186,788.00 4 [Proposing GIS substation (Original)10%$126,363.80 GVEA Schedule reduced MH's from Bradley actuals 17,527 NTE $1,390,001.80 4 Stone and Webster Engineering Corp.good some good 14,871 Des $1,082,004.00 5 4,176 CM $308,904.00 5 (Modified)10%$139,090.80 Alternative Schedule 19,047 NTE $1,529,998.80 5 Page 1 HF138SVE.XLS 19-Feb-94 Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV In'Transmission Line Proposal Evaluation Substation and Reactive Compensation General Engineering -Proposal!Evaluation or 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 0.00 DESIGN Project Data Design Design Soils Survey Constr.Matl Bid Bid Constr.Close React.Exist Expenses Man Costs perAdmin|Review |Criteria |Manual |Invest.|/Access |Details |Specs |Docs.Eval.Engr ]out |Comp.|SVS |Hours Proposal Stanley Fairbanks 208 161 90 155 61 65 473 226 91 40 135 94 134 117 2050 Consultants MHs &Costs $18,818 $11,309 $5,952 $9,990 $4,270 $4,451 $26,951 $14,478 $6,287 $3,781 $9,781 $5,314 $10,691 $9,368 $36,651 $178,092.00 Igloo 208 118 90 130 60 65 317 146 90 40 91 84 134 116 1689 MHs &Costs $18,818 $8,007 $5,952 $8,343 $4,232 $4,451 $18,097 $9,229 $6,192 $3,781 $6,555 $4,887 $10,691 $9,273 $36,651 $155,159.00 3,739 $333,251.00 R.W.Beck/Fairbanks 635 121 340 71 250 426 1427 981 212 11 221 164 616 276 5751 Dryden &Larue MHs &Costs $55,392 $10,520 $25,567 $5,592 $14,319 $24,118 $95,053 $70,979 $14,738 $1,232 $16,971 $10,928 $49,073 $23,186 $70,313 $487,981.00 Igloo 272 52 146 31 107 183 612 420 91 5 95 70 264 184 2532 MHs &Costs $23,740 $4,508 $10,957 $2,396 $6,137 $10,336 $40,737 $30,419 $6,316 $528 $7,273 $4,684 $21,031 $15,457 $30,134 $214,653.00 8,283 $702,634.00 Power Fairbanks 360 65 588 457 152 13 824 337 249 12 169 94 253 140 3713 Engineers,Inc MHs &Costs $25,020 $5,295 $34,548 $26,589 $11,456 $1,209 $48,645 $20,608 $15,913 $665 $12,487 $5,582 $17,727 $10,140 $44,233 $280,117.00 Igloo 240 43 395 307 100 9 547 225 171 8 114 63 169 140 2531 MHs &Costs $16,680 $3,517 $23,282 $17,941 $7,548 $837 $32,286 $13,788 $10,887 $539 $8,422 $3,739 $11,831 $10,140 $29,488 $190,925.00 6,244 $471,042.00 Stone and Webster Fairbanks 731 33 72 5380 76 142 68 176 32 28 80 80 1926 100 8924 Engineering Corp.MHs &Costs $52,955 $2,859 $5,260 $291,773 $4,747 $7,700 $4,282 $10,088 $1,487 $1,915 $4,626 $4,048 $135,487 $8,632 $113,611 $649,470.00 Igloo 487 48 72 2,699 76 135 68 76 32 28 80 80 1,926 100 5907 MHs &Costs $35,402 $4,059 $5,260 $151,158 $4,747 $7,300 $4,282 $4,412 $1,487 $1,915 $4,626 $4,048 $135,487 $8,632 $54,565 $427,380.00 14,831 $1,076,850.00 Stone and Webster Fairbanks 771 33 72 5380 76 142 68 176 32 28 80 80 1926 100 8964 Engineering Corp.MHs &Costs $56,307 $2,859 $5,260 $291,773 $4,747 $7,700 $4,282 $10,088 $1,487 $1,915 $4626 $4,048 $135,487 $8,632 $114,602 $653,813.00 Igloo 487 48 72 2,699 76 135 68 76 32 28 80 80 1,926 100 5907 MHs &Costs $35,402 $4,059 $5,260 $151,158 $4,747 $7,300 $4,282 $4,412 $1,487 $1,915 $4,626 $4,048 $135,487 $8,632 $55,376 $428,191.00 14,871 $1,082,004.00 Page 2 HF138SVE.XLS 19-Feb-94 Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substation and Reactive Compensation General Engineering -Pre 15.00 16.00 0.00 DESIGN PM/CM Inspect Expenses Man Costs per Hours Proposal Stanley 180 1040 1220 Consultants $17,015 $71,074 $32,500 $120,589.00 180 1,040 1220 $17,015 $71,074 $32,500 $120,589.00 2,440 $241,178.00 R.W.Beck/196 196 392 Dryden &Larue $10,976 $10,976 $10,350 $32,302.00 84 84 168 $4,704 $4,704 $10,350 $19,758.00 560 $52.060.00 Power 257 1658 1915 Engineers,Inc $14,895 $96,978 $39,350 $151,223.00 257 1,658 1915 $14,895 $96,978 $39,350 $151,223.00 3,830 $302,446.00 Stone and Webster 216 1144 1360 Engineering Corp.$13,839 $64,722 $21,817 $100,378.00 216 1,120 1336 $13,839 $62,922 $9,649 $86,410.00 2,696 $186,788.00 Stone and Webster 616 1524 2140 Engineering Corp.$38,791 $86,070 $28,651 $153,512.00 436 1,600 2036 $28,679 $89,888 $36,825 $155,392.00 4,176 $308,904.00 Page 3 PROPOSALTO PROVIDE ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR: GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE SUBSTATIONS AND REACTIVE COMPENSATION FEBRUARY 18,1994 FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THIS DOCUMENT CONTACT: <=STAN SOSTROM 12212 OLD GLENN HWY #8 FAGLE RIVER,AK 99577 PHONE:(907)696-4775 FAX:(907)696-4776 <=RANDY POLLOCK,PE. =TIM OSTERMEIER,P.E. HAILEY,IDAHO OFFICE PHONE (28)28-945 -ROMEFAX:(208)788-2082 DOCUMENTNO.BD1-20-183 COPYNO:. ISSUEDTO:..... Ne 2'DOWERNGINEERS February 18,1994 Mr.Steve Haagenson Manager of Engineering Services Golden Valley Electric Association,Inc. P.O.Box 71249 Fairbanks,AK 99707-1249 Subject:Request for Proposal Response Healy-Fairbanks 230kV Intertie Substations and Reactive Compensation Dear Steve: Thank you for the opportunity to submit a proposal for the Golden Valley Electric Association's Healy-Fairbarks 230kV Intertie Substations and Reactive Compensation Project.POWER is contident that we have assembled a complete and comprehensive proposal that addresses GVEA's areas of concern and covers ail project requirements. POWER has been providing engineering design and related services to the electric utlity industry for more than 18 wears Our talented,multidisciplinary staff of more than 400 people enables POWER to neriorm large and complex projects similar to GVEA's on a regular basis.Several of thesc projects are asescribed in detail in the Project Experience section of this proposal. Over the years,POWER has successfully compieted many utility projects in Alaska.Some of these projects are also highlighted in the Project Experience section.Our extensive list of Alaska clients includes MAPCO Alaska Petroleum,UNOCAL,Alaska [Energy Authority,Kodiak Electric Association.City of Petersburg and Elmendorf U.S.Air Force Base,among many others.Our experience in Alaska and with similar substation projects gives POWERa strong understandiny of GVEA's requirements. Additional attributes that GVEA imavy find attractive in choosing POWER and our select specialized subconsultants inciude e Commitment to the Alaska stits narket as evidenced by our permanent office in Anchorage. .¢-Alaska-registered project team meibers with specific cold weather and arctic soul: "experience. 12212 Old Glenn Highway,Suite #8 *Eagle River 4 asxa 99577-7572 »(907)696-4775 »*Fax:(907)696.4776 PRIA ASSO Mr.Haagenson February 18,1994 Page 2 e Corporate commitment through an active Project Principal,Mr.Randy Pollock,Senior Vice President,who will ensure that your project receives top priority. «Direct experience in working with EPRI on the recently completed 500kV ThyristorControlledSeriesCapacitor(TCSC)project. e Years of continuous REA experience handling the required forms,formats and approvals. e Applicable experience in writing and/or performing to turnkey performance specifications for SVS installations and large substation projects. e Experiencein providing station service to remote sites.e Several ideas,outlined in the Work Plan section of this document,that may save GVEA substantial construction dollars. We have completed the GVEA Cost Breakdown and Manhour Breakdown sheets which are included in the Budget section of this proposal.We have also provided a comprehensive Work Plan that details POWER's Scope of Work.This Work Plan,in our standard format,is cross-referenced to GVEA's Task Outline to reassure GVEA that we have addressed each area of responsibility as outlined in the RFP. We have received your clarification letter dated February 4,1994 and have taken it into consideration in the preparation of this proposal. Again,thank you for the opportunity to provide a proposal for this exciting and challenging project.Please call me at (907)696-4775 if you have questions about this submittal. Sincerely, POWER Engineers,Inc. Ste Sesho Stan Sostrom,Project Manager SS/}j Enclosures cc:R.Pollock . J.Cucullu Tim Ostermeier RF/BD DPOWER PEIAKASSO009 ENGINEERS Ps , NOTICE TO REVIEWERS I MOWER This document was prepared by POWER Enyineers,Inc.(POWER)for a specific project,taking into consideration the specific and unique requirements of the project.Reuse of this document or any information contained in this document tor any purpose ts prohibited unless wntten permission from both POWER and POWER's chent is granted. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PROJECT APPROACH ......ccccceccsceseccessesesseseeseseessesens | WORK PLAN .oe.ceeececceseeseseeeees vecacevsesevaceetseestseeeeans T SCHEDULE....ccessccescscsscssecesseceesessceecsccscaucaesneacanes TT BUDGET .o.ccccccsccseccscesesecevscsseseestareseacsrsatsateassavass IV PROJECT TEAM ou...cccccceccccescscesescescseeacessstcsseseseeaees V QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ......0..cecscseeees vl PLIMER |.PROJECT APPROACH INTRODUCTION This document represents POWER's response to GVEA's Request for Proposal (RFP)for the Healy-Fairbanks Intertie Substations and Reactive Compensation Project (Project).It describes in detail our understanding of GVEA's needs and examines how POWER proposes to bring the project to a successful completion. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project includes complete detailed design of two substations and turnkey specifications for associated Reactive Compensation systems.The northern terminal of the new Healy-Fairbanks Intertie near Fairbanks will be a new 138-69 kV station with the reactive compensation on the 138 kV portion.The Igloo Substation will be located on the existing Anchorage-Fairbanks Intertie south of Cantwell and will be a new 138 kV station,also with reactive compensation facilities.In addition,turnkey specifications for modifications to or replacement of the controls on the existing SVS systems at Gold Hill and Healy will be required. The southern terminal of the line will be at the existing Healy Substation.It is assumed that required modifications to the Healy Substation will be designed by others. POWER TEAM POWER has assembled an impressive team of individuals covering all disciplines required for successful completion of the project.Specific areas o! expertise include: COTOWER e Substation Design e Geotechnical Engineering (Arctic Experience) e SVS and Applied Technologies e Cold Weather Experience ¢Mechanical,Electrical and Seismic Engineering ¢Relay and Control Experience Our key personnel proposed to perform this important and complex project have many years of applicable experience,as described further in the Project Team section.This experience offers a distinct advantage when it comes to completing the project on time and within budget. POWER also is making a corporate commitment to this project by assigning Randy Pollock,P.E.,as the project principal to provide oversight and periodic involvement.In his 20-plus years in the utility business Randy has been involved in a variety of challenging and difficult projects.Randy would conduct routine conference calls with GVEA personnel and with POWER's project and engineering managers,Stan Sostrom and Tim Ostermeier,P.E.His involvement would ensure that the project stays on track and remains a very high priority within POWER's organization. Stan,the proposed Project Manager,permanently resides in Alaska and would have overall project responsibility.Tim,the proposed Engineering Manager, resides in Idaho and would direct day-to-day engineering efforts,as coordinated with Stan,from our Hailey office.Both of these individuals have years of direct applicable experience in both the substation arena and in the required specialty fields of SVS and related technologies.They have worked together on numerous projects over the past five years. The proposed SVS and Protective Relay project engineer,Don Angell,P.E.,is recognized in Alaska utility circles as one of the industry's most knowledgeable and capable systems studies engineers,as can be confirmed by many utilityengineersandmanagers.Don would be supported by Electrical Power Consultants (EPC),of Schenectady,NY.EPC's engineers have provided similar systems studies for reactive compensation installations throughout the world. PPQWER/ In addition,POWER would provide geotechnical engineering under the direction of Larry Hinton,P.E.,who would be complemented by our subconsultant Larry Hinzman,Ph.D.,an internationally recognized arctic soils specialist located in Fairbanks.POWER would subcontract the site soil borings to a local drilling company familiar with utility installations. Other required engineering disciplines,including civil,mechanical and architectural,would be directly supported by full-time employees of POWER in our Idaho office.Each of the responsible leads is registered and experienced in providing service for substations,SVS-type installations and related facilities throughout the United States. ) Complete and detailed information of applicable experience for each of the team's key individuals is provided in the Project Team section of this document. PROJECT EXPERIENCE POWER has been in existence since 1976,and in that time has become one of the recognized leaders in the design of utility systems.POWER started out by providing design services to small,local REAs.Since then,we have expanded our service territory to include all areas of the United States,particularly Alaska. POWER has provided substation,SVS and SVS-related technologies designs for organizations such as Bonneville Power Administration,Los Angeles Dept.of Water and Power (via subcontract with Siemens),EPRI,and General Electric for numerous projects ranging from 69kV through 500kV.In 1993 POWER completed the SOOkV Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC)Bank Project at BPA's Slatt Substation.This project was a demonstration of technology effort by EPRI and GE to provide a fully functional and adjustable EHV series compensation device to enhance system stability and provide for increased real power flow on a major transmission path.POWER provided preliminary engineering,complete detailed design,construction contractor selection,contract administration,construction management and testing support for this fast-track project. ezowen! Other major projects recently completed include detailed design of eight SOOkV series capacitor banks for BPA totaling 3.7GVAR,and four 5QQOkV series capacitor banks for Western Area Power Administration totaling 2.3GVAR. Both of these large projects were to support construction of the 3rd AC Intertie project between Oregon and California. POWER has continuously provided substation designs from its inception and now boasts one of the best teams in the industry.As shown in the experience matrix included in Section VI,Qualifications and Experience,POWER has provided all types of substation designs from S5kV through SOOkV for a wide variety of clients.We routinely provide design services for simple one-bay additions up to complete new stations,depending on the project's requirements. POWER brings depth and talent to GVEA's project in all required areas including site/civil,civil/structural,geotechnical,physical layout,control and relaying,communications,SCADA,mechanical (HVAC),and architectural engineering.This depth gives us the ability to provide a truly independent internal quality check of our designs. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Effective Project Management is a crucial element of the Project Approach. POWER's proven Project Management (PM)System will be utilized for GVEA's project.Our computerized PM System is based on defining the distinct tasks required for project completion.These tasks are then scheduled, budgeted,tracked,and managed.The result is accurate project information, rapidly obtained,enabling GVEA and POWER personnel to make decisions with confidence. WORK PLAN POWER's Work Plan breaks down the project into distinct tasks and subtasks, and defines POWER's technical approach in specific detail.The tasks to be performed for the entire project,from project development through C@ZIWER construction,are included.The Work Plan clearly demonstrates how carefully POWER has thought about the project,and shows our method of performing the required tasks.Please see Section II,Work Plan,for our complete technical approach to the Healy-Fairbanks 230kV Intertie Substations and Reactive Compensation Project. In the preparation of the Work Plan,POWER has made several critical assumptions.POWER's budget and schedule are based on these assumptions.We have outlined several of these assumptions below for your convenience. The sample specifications for the Kenai SVS and/or EPRI/HECO Battery Energy Storage installations will be made available to POWER in an acceptable electronic format and may be used as a basis for the preparation of turnkey specifications for this contract.The submittal review portion of the reactive compensation stations will be limited to review of station physical drawings,such as station layout and elevations,grounding and fencing,and site preparation,interconnection wiring diagrams,manufacturer's submittals for major equipment such and transformer and circuit breakers,and the control building.No time has been included to review submittals for control logic or specialty equipment. POWER has included time for two construction inspectors,one of which will act as construction manager.We have assumed that the SVS construction will not run concurrently with the substation construction.The estimates contained in the budget proposal are based on the project schedule. COMPUTER UTILIZATION POWER utilizes numerous software programs to assist the team members in their design efforts.The software we anticipate using for this project is listed below. C2IMER Ground Cale -In-house program to establish grid requirements Bus Calc -In-house program to verify bus/bus support strengths Enercalc -Foundation design program In-Roads -Cut and fill optimization EE Schematic -Schematic design development EE Wiring and -Automated panel wiring,in conjunction Panel Design with EE Schematic Model Draft -Physical station design Symphony -Material lists,structure lists QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE POWER's commitment to performing quality work is backed by a program of continuous training.POWER provides for ongoing training both in house and at off-site seminars such as the Western Protective Relay Conference.In fact, we have provided instructors at this particular seminar in each of the last three years. Our in-house training consists of classes taught by our senior engineers to our staff engineers and designers.In the substation group,for example,we cover a special topic in detail each week.Past topics have included direct stroke lightning protection,step distance relaying and bus layout arrangements,among others.This continuous training demonstrates our commitment to excellence. The result is a highly skilled and knowledgeable staff that brings up-to-date technical know-how to clients'projects. POWER provides quality control and assurance for each of our projects by affording an independent review by one of our senior engineers at critical stages of the project,as determined by the Project Manager.This independent review builds quality into our product from the start,not correcting oversights in the field where they are both time consuming and costly._7 ODIWER 'POWER'S APPROACH WORKS An effective project approach goes a long way toward project success.That is why we have taken the time to prepare a thorough and well-thought-out response to GVEA's Request for Proposal.As you review this proposal,that thoroughness will be evident,from the work plan to the schedule to the selection of a project team and subconsultants.Should we be awarded the contract,that same degree of careful planning and attention to detail will characterize our work throughout the life of the project.POWER's approach works -our past performance proves it! OLIWER£As ll.WORK PLAN INTRODUCTION This section contains POWER's proposed Work Plan for the execution of the Project.POWER's Work Plan is composed of: e Task Outline e Task Sequence Diagram e Task Descriptions The Task Outline is a listing of all tasks and subtasks for this project.The Task Sequence Diagram shows how the various tasks are designed to interact. Seventeen (17)tasks,including Task 0 Project Management,are required to complete the Project. Following the Task Sequence Diagram are detailed Task Descriptions that define the activities or events that POWER must perform or have accomplished to complete this project efficiently The Task Descriptions (as well as the Project Schedule,Budget,and Status Reports)are numerically coded to facilitate reference and tracking. Note that primary responsibility tor the completion of each task is shown after the task heading.Occasionally,responsibility will be shared,and this will be noted by GVEA/POWER.| CLIMER WORK PLAN BENEFITS POWER's Work Plan offers several benefits to GVEA.Some of the key benefits are listed below: e Because the Work Plan clearly describes what we expect each task will cover, it eliminates any misunderstandings or misinterpretations of what a task will entail. e Because of the Work Plan's great degree of detail,GVEA can easily compare POWER's comprehension of the project with other plans.This comparison clearly points out those plans that have not addressed key concerns. e By preparing the Work Plan,POWER has become familiar with the Project. We are already aware of unique aspects of the job and have given it a great deal of consideration., e The Project Plan is representative of the quality of work that is put into every project we undertake.The organization found throughout the Work Plan, Schedule,and Budget continues after we receive GVEA's Notice to Proceed. e The Work Plan offers a proposed way to complete the Project.This is not a final version,and we encourage GVEA's review and revision before approval. e The layout of the Work Plan,as well as the rest of the proposal,has been developed for reading ease and use We urge GVEA to note any questions or comments along the margins while reading this document. POWER is confident the following Work Plan is inclusive of GVEA's requirements for the Project and demonstrates our understanding of the scope and magnitude of the project. BLOWERB0120183GVEA(02/18/94y/al Ltt4 GENERAL ENGINEERING TASKS CROSS REFERENCE GVEA Responsibility Chart to POWER Work Plan Corresponding POWER Work Task #GVEA Task Description Plan Task(s) 1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION L.1 Project initiation meeting 0.1 1.2.Monthly Progress Reports 0.2 1.3.Project Administration 0.2 2.0 DATA REVIEW 2.1 Area Maps GVEA 2.2 Determine site location based on use requirements GVEA 2.3.Local,State and Federal agency coordination | 2.4 Determine access requirements/routes/helipad 11 2.5 Field review substation locations aI 2.6 Final site map L.A 2.7 Cost estimate verification -Substations and SVS's Ll 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA 3.1 Develop Design Criteria 1.2 3.2 Ultimate future substation layout and site requirements 1.2 3.3.Develop relay,control and breaker requirements 1.2 3.4 Structure designs 1.2 3.5 Clearance requirements 1.2 3.6 Reactive compensation type and capacities 1.2 3.7.Communications for SCADA control and indication 1.2 3.8 Acquire substation land rights for ultimate lavout GVEA 4.0 DESIGN MANUAL 4.1 Basic Design Document -Substations 1.3.3.1,32.33,42 42 Basic Design Document -Civ Design 1.3.35.36.54.43 4.3 Basic Design Document -Relay and Controls 13.4 1-44 4.4 Basic Design Document -Reactive Compensation 13,8.1-84 91-04 45 Design Data Summary (REA Form 265)13 _ 4.6 Obtain REA approval of basic design document 13 _ 5.0 SOILS INVESTIGATION _ §.1 Geotechnic drilling (arctic experience required)bao _ 5 Geotechnic analysis {4 5.Foundation/Embedment Design 13 5.4.Ground Resistance Measurements 14 @POWER 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 SURVEY /ACCESS Field survey -specifications and contract administration Obtain ficld survey info.and perform control survey Assist surveyor during structure staking CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS/DETAILS Prepare foundation plans for construction Structure data sheets Structure staking sheets and drawings Prepare structure drawings Prepare assembly drawings MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS /LIST Material inquiries Preliminary bill of materials Final bill of materials Prepare material bid specifications Obtain bids for materials Issue purchase orders for materials Expedite.inspect.and receive materials BID DOCUMENTS ) Prepare construction contract packet -REA form 831 Issue construction contract for review Review design and construction contract packet Solicit construction bids Prepare engineer's estimate for substation construction Prebid Conference BID EVALUATION Conduct bid opening Evaluate construction bids Notice to Proceed Pre-construction conference ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION Provide engineering assistance during construction Relay settings for substation devices RECORD DRAWINGS /CLOSE-OUT Perform as-built revisions Complete REA close-out documents -Form 254,ete. REACTIVE COMPENSATION (RC) Finalize reactive compensation type and sizingPreparetechnicalspecificationsforturkeyRC's NA 3.5 3.1,3.3,3.4,3.6 2.1,10.1,10.2,10.3 2.2,2.3,11.1 2.1 2.1,11.2 GVEA GVEA GVEA 6.1 6.2,14.2 GVEA GVEA 6.2 6.3 GVEA GVEA 15.2 COWES) 14.0 15.0 16.0 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 137 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 15.10 15.11 15.12 15.13 15.14 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 16.10 Evaluate technical proposals for tumkey installations Finalize technical proposals for commercial bids Prepare engineer's estimatefor RC construction Evaluate commercial proposals Review and approve submittals and shop drawings EXISTING STATIC VAR SYSTEM CONTROLS Study existing Gold Hill and Healy SVS controls Specifications for replacement of Gold Hill SVS controls Specifications for replacement of Healy SVS controls Evaluate turkey proposals for SVS control changes Review and approve submittals and shop drawings PROJECT /CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Construction contract administration Conduct initial meeting with std.info.exchange Conduct partnering meeting with contractor/(GVEA Review contractor construction schedule Work with inspector for production and field decisions Review and recommendation for partial payments Maintain records of completed units /scheduled work Develop and present change orders to GVEA Interpret contract for contractor Maintain log of contract discussions and changes Assist GVEA with agency coordination Backup inspector as needed Conduct final inspection Perform as-built revisions CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Daily on-site inspection of construction activities Provide daily inspection reports Conduct regular meeting with contractor Work w/CM to select best options for field conditions Develop data for change orders Assist GVEA with material record keeping Review and approve wire stringing procedures Maintain a log of contractor discussions /changes Maintain independent reports oftesting activities Assist GVEA with ageney coordination 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 84 9.1 92 9.2 93 9.4 16.1 15.2,15.3 16.1 16.1 13.2,16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1] 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.2 13.1.13.3,162 13.1,13.3,162 16.2 16.2 13.1,162 162 162 162 161 2 DOWER)ENGINE EAS TASK OUTLINE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASK ___0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Subtask 0.1 Project Management -0.2 Project Administration SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES -PM SUBSTATION DESIGN TASK 1 SUBSTATION INITIATION Subtask 1.1 Data Acquisition 1.2 Preliminary Design Criteria,Manual and Studies 1.3 Preliminary Review 1.4 Soils Investigation 1.5 Topographic Survey TASK__2 SUBSTATION EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS Subtask 2.1 Technical Specifications 2.2 Technical Evaluation 2.3 Submittal Review CLIWER/ TASK 3 SUBSTATION LAYOUT Subtask 3.1 Plan and Sections 3.2 Foundation Design 3.3 Grounding &Fencing 3.4 Cable &Conduit 3.5 Structure Design 3.6 Site Preparation TASK 4 SUBSTATION CONTROL &RELAYING Subtask 4.1 Station Protection Analysis 42 Schematic &Three-Line Drawings 43 Control Panels 4.4 Wiring Diagrams 4.5,SCADA 4.6 Relay Coordination TASK 5 SVS AND SUBSTATION CONTROL BUILDING Subtask 5.1 Building Arrangement 5.2 AC &DC Station Service 5.3 Lighting &HVAC TASK 6 SUBSTATION REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Subtask 6.1 Construction Specifications 6.2 Design Review 6.3 Construction Support ONIN AWE A021 B/G4 Val N-7 CLQWER) TASK 7 COMMISSIONING (OPTIONAL) Subtask 71 Mobilization 7.2 On-Site Commissioning 7.3 Demobilization and Final Report TASK 8 REACTIVE COMPENSATION ENGINEERING Subtask 8.1 Sizing Support 8.2 Technical Specifications 8.3 Technical Evaluation 8.4 Submittal Review TASK 9 SVS CONTROL MODIFICATIONS Subtask 9.1 Study Support 9.2 Specification Preparation 9.3 Technical Evaluation 9.4 Submittal Review SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES -SUBSTATION DESIGN PROCUREMENT |TASK 10 PROCUREMENT INITIATION Subtask 10.1 Procurement Procedures 10.2 Procurement Identification 10.3 Procurement Review CLIWER TASK 11 VENDOR SELECTION Subtask 11.1 Request for Quotation 1h Bid Opening 11.3.Purchase Order Issue TASK 12 EXPEDITING &RECEIVING Subtask 12.1 Expediting (By GVEA) 12.2 Receiving (By GVEA) SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES --PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION TASK 13 CM INITIATION Subtask 13.1 CM Procedures 13.2 Construction Contract 13.3 CM Review TASK 14 CONTRACTOR SELECTION Subtask 14.1 Notice &Instructions 14.2 Pre-Bid Conference 14.3 Bid Opening Cotetheatl alVieettae LE)1.9 CLIMER TASK 15 MOBILIZATION Subtask 15.1 Notice of Award 15.2 Pre-Construction Conference 15.3 Mobilization TASK 16 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Subtask 16.1 Contract Administration 16.2 Construction Inspection 16.3 Close-Out SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES --CM 2pDOWER POWER ENGINEERS,INC ISSUED FEBRUARY 16,1994 ©1994 POWER ENGINEERS,INC TASK 1 GVEA/POWER SUBSTATION INTIATION 1.1 DATA ACQUISITION 1.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA. MANUAL AND STUDIES 1.3 PRELIMINARY REVIEW 1.4 SOILS INVESTIGATION 1.5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TASK 2 POWER r TASK 10 GVEA/POWER *TASK 11 GVEA/POWER TASK 12 GVEA SUBSTATION EQUIPMENT SPEC.PROCUREMENT INITIATION VENDOR SELECTION EXPEDITING &RECEIMNG 2.1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 2.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2.3 SUBMITTAL REVIEW TASK 3 POWER 10.1 PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES 10.3 PROCUREMENT REVIEW TASK 4 10.2 PROCUREMENT IDENTIFICATION POWER Vt.REQUEST FOR QUOTATION 11.2 BID OPENING 11.3 PURCHASE ORDER ISSUE TASK 5 .POWER TASK 6 GVEA/POWER 42.1 EXPEDITING 12.2 RECEIVING SUBSTATION LAYOUT |SUBSTATION CONTROL&RELAYING 3.1 PLAN AND SECTIONS 3.2 FOUNDATION DESIGN 3.3 GROUNDING &FENCING 3.4 CABLE &CONQUIT 3.5 STRUCTURE DESIGN 3.6 SITE PREPARATION -TASK 8 GVEA/POWER * 4.1 STATION PROTECTION ANALYSIS 4.2 SCHEMATIC &THREE-LINE DRAWINGS 4.3 CONTROL PANELS 4.4 WIRING DIAGRAMS 4.5 SCADA , 4.6 RELAY COORDINATION TASK 9 GVEA/POWER * SVS &SUBSTATIONCONTROLBUILDING 4 5.1 BUILDING ARRANGEMENT §.2 aC &OC STATIGN SERVICE 5.3 CIGHTING &RVAC Y 6.%CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 6.2 CESIGN REVIEW 6.3 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT REACTIVE COMPENSATION ENGINEERING SVS CONTROL MODIFICATIONS |RC TURNKEY CONTRACT TASK_13 j GVEA/POWER © r CM INITIATION 8.1 SIZING SUPPORT \pe]9-2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 8.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION 8.4 SUBNITTAL REVIEW 9.1 STUDY SUPPORT 9.2 SPECIFICATION PREPARATION 9.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION 3.4 SUBMITTAL REVIEW ENGINEER.PROCURE &CONSTRUCT RC FACILITIES 13.1 CM PROCEDURES 13.2 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 13.3 CM REVIEW GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOC.,INC. HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230KV INTERTIE SUBSTATIONS & REACTIVE COMPENSATION GVEA/POWER _-TASK_16 GVEA/POWER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 16.1 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 16.2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 16.3 CLOSE-OUT TASK 15 MOBILIZATION TASK 14 15.1 NOTICE OF AWARD 15.2 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 15.3 MOBILIZATION CVEA/POWER CONTRACTOR SELECTION 14.9 NOTICE &INSTRUCTIONS 14.2 PRE-BID CONFERENCE 14.2 BID OPENING TASK_7 \POWER COMMISSIONING (OPTIONAL) 1.1 MOBILIZATION 7.2 ON-SITE COMMISSIONING 7.3 DENOBILIZATION AND FINAL REPORT SYMSOL GVEA POWER TAS 1 Vea r LEGEND ) DEFINITION GVEA RESPONSIBILITY POWER RESPONSIBILITY TaSK IDENTIFIER SUBTASK IDENTIFIER GVEA REVIEW &APPROVAL -_, OE DOME - PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASK_0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Responsibility.GVEA/POWER Objective:Efficient and timely completion of the work through the provision of well planned,scheduled,and managed engineering and construction management services. Key Elements:Planning,scheduling,organizing,monitoring and managing of the individual tasks and subtasks,cost control and reporting,and the implementation of a definitive plan of action in order to accomplish the completion of the work in a predetermined and timely manner.. Task Prerequisite: e Notice to Proceed Task Deliverables: e Project Record e Project Schedule e Administrative Procedures e Monthly Status Reports ODQWER SUBTASK 0.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Provide project supervision.Monitor the progress of the work,enforce compliance with the general procedures,assure timely task completion,review status reports,and expedite the work by providing for the coordination of and allocation or redirection of resources.Provide for the ongoing maintenance and supervision of all activities related to budgets,schedules,and overall administrative and fiscal procedures for the tasks for which POWER is responsible.The Project Principal will periodically hold teleconferences with POWER's Project Manager, Engineering Manager,and GVEA's Engineering Manager to ensure that GVEA's expectations are being met. Determine the project filing procedures,correspondence procedures and "cc"list as required by GVEA and internal POWER requirements.Direct POWER staff in the implementation of these procedures.Maintain the Project Record,a chronological history of project progress and correspondence relevant to the project,including status reports. Prepare and transmit to GVEA the minutes of all meetings held by POWER with GVEA or third parties within one week of such meetings.Prepare and maintain files of correspondence and telephone memoranda between GVEA and POWER, and POWER and any third parties Provide copies,if requested,of all correspondence between POWER and third parties to GVEA. SUBTASK 0.2 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER _Develop project-specific Administrative Procedures.Establish in detail the general administrative procedures,fiscal tracking and reporting procedures and control, and the relationships to be followed 1n all phases of the project for which POWER is responsible.Update the procedures periodically,or.as required,to maintain current status. ODIMER Establish and maintain a system to provide GVEA with continuous,timely,and concise information regarding schedules and budgets for those tasks for which POWERis responsible. Prepare and submit to GVEA monthly status reports.Summarize the progress of the work for the services provided by POWER,subcontracted services,costs, work expected to be accomplished in the next month,problems,trends,and/or delays and the reasons for and actions being taken to bring those areas back on schedule or budget.Ensure that the monthly project status reports form a permanent part of the Project Record. Update the project schedule,as the work progresses,to reflect any changes that may influence the critical interim and completion dates.Take the necessary action to achieve the scheduled dates. SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES -PM e Project Record e Project Schedule e Administrative Procedures e Status Reports OLIWER SUBSTATION DESIGN TASK 1___SUBSTATION INITIATION Responsibility;GVEA/POWER Objective:Identify,define,and secure GVEA approval of the specific parameters necessary to proceed with the detailed design of the station. Development of the planimetric and topographic data required for design of the station layout and site preparation. Exploration,analysis and evaluation of the local geology and development of a geotechnical data base for the use in design and construction of the structure footings. Key Elements:Data acquisition and review,development of the One-Line Diagrams,General Arrangement Plans,and the Design Criteria.GVEA review, revision where required,and,ultimately,approval of the One-Line Diagram, General Arrangement Plan,and Design Criteria. Exploration,.analysis and evaluation of the site geology and geotechnical data including excavation conditions,cut slope stability,groundwater conditions,and resistivity profile.Develop a geotechnical evaluation program to include field evaluation and laboratory testing Select a local geotechnical drilling and laboratory testing company and supervise all drilling and laboratory testing programs. _Definition,.evaluation,and recommendation of the foundation design and construction parameters including particular arctic concerns,allowable horizontal and vertical soil bearing capacities.lateral loads,uplift loads,excavation difficulty, groundwater control,and excavation stability Summarize the field and laboratory aa ne nee ee nn eee a@e CPIMER programs,perform engineering analysis,formulate foundation design recommendations,and prepare a Geotechnical Engineering Report summarizing the findings. Identification and location of all existing features that could impact design,such as obstacles to line and feeder exits,planimetric data,existing structures,access roads,helipad,drainage features,etc.Development of the topographic features that will impact site design. Task Prerequisites: e Notice to Proceed e Right-of-Entry Provided Prior to Site Mobilization e Underground Utilities Located Prior to Initiating Field Work e Structure Site Plan &Foundation Reactions e Previous Geotechnical Investigation Reports (if available) Task Deliverables: e OQOne-Line Diagrams (3)e Basic Design Documents including: e Design Criteria (1)e -Substations e General Arrangement Plan (3)e -Civil Design e Support for Agency Coordination e -Relay and Controls e Cost Estimate Verification (1)-Reactive Compensation (RC) e Geotechnical Engineering Report (1) e Survey Data (1)as applicable)[1] e Topographic Data (Site Maps)e REA Approval of Basic Design e Field Review of Substation Locations Documents (1) Task Assumptions: 'e Physical Access with a Conventional Truck Mounted Drilling Rig e Continuous Progression of Field Work Design Data Summary (REA form 265 OLQWERsee SUBTASK 1.1 DATA ACQUISITION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Review existing studies and reports,and conduct such additional research as may be necessary to identify and confirm the design requirements.Coordinate with GVEA to ensure compatibility with the existing system. Support GVEA if complying with Agency specifications and requirements that apply to the project.Review GVEA-compiled and Agency maps and drawings and meteorological,environmental and such other data as may be required for design. Secure accurate data on the sites for inclusion in the final design including access requirements,routes and helipads.Investigate the existing facilities which may be included in the final design and include pertinent information such as manufacturer, model and rating.Secure a listing of GVEA-preferred materials,manufacturers and suppliers. To secure accurate data on the existing facilities or site,a field inspection of the site by design personnel will be required. Provide the topographic map requirements for both sites for utilization by POWER's survey subcontractor.Provide administration for the survey subcontract. SUBTASK 1.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN,CRITERIA, MANUAL AND STUDIES Responsibility:POWER Establish the One-Line Diagrams and the General Arrangement Plans which will be the basis for developing the Design Criteria and ultimately the Design Manuals for both sites. CPOWER Complete the substation One-Line Diagrams.Coordinate with GVEA and perform such preliminary analysis as is necessary in order to define the elements of the station required to finalize the One-Line Diagrams.Depict the general bus arrangement,reactive compensation transformer,circuit breaker,disconnect switch ratings,and such communications facilities as are directly tied to the system. Illustrate the interconnection of relaying,metering,SCADA,circuit breakers and other devices.Determine metering and relaying locations and requirements and indicate such on the drawing by the location of the CTs and VTs.Identify and note transformer connections (delta-wye,wye-wye,etc.)on the One-Line Diagrams. Complete the General Arrangement Plan providing for future expansion. Coordinate with GVEA and perform such analysis as is necessary in order to define the elements of the station required to finalize the General Arrangement Plan including adequate space for the RC.Depict the physical bus arrangement and configuration,line entries and exits,transformer,breakers and switch locations,station baselines and perimeters,control building,etc.Identify and note bus connections,and phasing on the drawing. Review all available data and compile and issue the Design Criteria for GVEA review,revision and approval.Summarize all proposed analysis and design procedures and criteria.Include the following: e General Description e No.of Terminals e Site Criteria ¢Grounding ©Weather Conditions -e Conductor e RC Type and Size (Support Only)¢Bus e Controlling Codes e Insulation e Access Requirements e Shielding e Electrical Loading _e Structures @ Mechanical Loading e Material Types e Major Equipment |e Foundations e Electrical Clearances e Surfacing e Operating Voltages e Drainage CROWES e SCADA ¢Control House e Communications -e Station Lighting e Metering *DC Station Service e AC Station Service e Station Layout e Transformer Size e Relaying and Controls Complete the Design Criteria document.Ensure that the scope and content of this document,as approved by GVEA,serves as the basis for the Basic Design Documents and the detailed design engineering. SUBTASK 1.3 PRELIMINARY REVIEW Responsibility:GVEA/POWER .Schedule and attend a meeting at GVEA's offices to review the preliminary design material.Forward the One-Line Diagrams,General Arrangement Plans,Design Criteria and proposed meeting agenda to GVEA sufficiently in advance to allow for adequate preparation. Incorporate such changes as GVEA may request that are consistent with the scope of work defined in this Work Plan. Secure GVEA approval of the One-Line Diagram,General Arrangement Plan,and Design Criteria.Summarize the meeting minutes and route copies to all concerned "parties for review. Utilize the documentation to develop the Basic Design Documents to include the following sections: e Substations e Civil Design e Relay and Controls _ e Reactive Compensation @LZQWERNINEERD Complete REA form 265 as applicable.Submit all basic design documentation to REA for approval.Incorporate REA comments to obtain approval.Prepare preliminary budgetary level cost estimates for the substations and RCs. SUBTASK 1.4 SOILS INVESTIGATIONS Responsibility:POWER Design the geotechnical evaluation program to provide a soil parameter data base for the design of the structure footings for the transformer,A-Frame,circuit breaker,bus supports,and other associated foundations for the Fairbanks and Igloo Substations.Include exploration,analysis and evaluation of the geotechnical conditions to formulate foundation design recommendations. Select,manage,and coordinate.with a local drilling and testing subcontractor and provide a geotechnical engineer to manage the drilling operations,log soil profiles, and collect soil samples at each of the substation sites. Review the site plan,structure location data and groundline reaction data. Establish the boring plan,field sampling and laboratory testing program,and groundline reactions as required to develop foundation recommendations. Evaluate five (5)boring locations per substation,with particular consideration for potential areas of changing soil strata.Borings will be advanced to a typical depth of thirty feet (30').Evaluate the existence of geotechnically dissimilar units, groundwater,and permafrost.Total boring depths and quantities of borings,to adequately determine the litholovical sequence,will be based on actual soil conditions at each site and additional footage and/or quantity of borings will be decided by POWER's geotechnical engineer while performing the field work Work beyond the scope ofthis proposal shall be completed on a time and expense basis. Select representative samples and determine the most desirable laboratory tests based upon the required engineering parameters,the type,availability,and quality of samples. CLIMER Perform field resistivity tests in conjunction with the geotechnical field work performed at each station site.Determine ground resistance parameters representative of the major soil type encountered.Note the weather and soil conditions which could affect the ground resistivity at the time the readings were taken.Evaluate the field resistivity data and develop resistivity profile for each test location.Incorporate the analysis ofthe field data into the design of the grounding for the station structures and station ground grid. Review existing geotechnical data,available published geologic data,along with the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing.Prepare a report including characterization of surface and subsurface conditions,geologic setting, groundwater,permafrost,resistivity profiles,excavation conditions,construction considerations,boring logs,boring plan,laboratory results,and foundation design parameters and recommendations. SUBTASK 1.5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Responsibility:POWER Perform a topographic survey of the station site.Define the existing contours using a grid system based on the precision required for final grade.Establish the baseline monuments and gather all planimetric data within the impact zone of the station.Locate section and/or quarter (1/4)corners and property corners that lie within or adjacent to the site,which can be located after a reasonable search. Utilize survey methods adequate for obtaining the required limits for orders and accuracy's.Record field notes in securely bound field books.Keep field notes in a clear and legible manner,uniform in character and interpretable and usable with ease by anyone having a knowledge of surveying. Field inspect and inventory existing facilities and equipment to gather reliable data for inclusion in the final design.Tabulate the data on existing facilities which may be included in the final design and include pertinent information such as manufacturer,model and rating. DOWERSTOWE! Plot and identify the station baselines and baseline monuments.Show all planimetric features within the station impact zone.Include the location of roads, fences,trees,drainage features,railroads,canals,buildings,foundation remains, existing power and/or communication lines (all structures),rock outcrops,rock _Slides,swamps,rivers,and other permanent features. e Topographic Survey Data ¢Topographic Manuscript C2IME TASK 2 SUBSTATION EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS Responsibility:POWER Objective:Identification and specification for early procurement of the major substation equipment required. Key Elements:Identification of the major long-lead time equipment, determination of the equipment ratings and specific requirements,preparation of Technical Specifications,evaluation of vendor submittals,preparation of recommendations for purchase and the approval or denial of manufacturers' drawings and data submittals.GVEA will issue and receive bids. Task Prerequisites: «One-Line Diagram e Manufacturers'Submittals e General Arrangement Plan Task Deliverables: e Technical Specifications e Purchase Recommendations e Approval Drawings Rennes anne eee -10694 DOWER)CIE ES SUBTASK 2.1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Responsibility:POWER Develop Technical Specifications for each major equipment item identified. Specify design,performance requirements,operational and maintenance features, field service engineer,warranty,assembly drawings,compliance submittals, protective coating,shipping and delivery by the manufacturer.Develop an equipment-specific list of qualified vendors. Provide GVEA one (1)unbound copy of the final equipment specification in POWER's standard format.GVEA will provide terms and conditions,make requisite number of copies,bind,issue and receive bids.GVEA will also issue the purchase orders,expedite,inspect and receive materials. Other miscellaneous items such as bus fittings,ground lugs,etc.,will be purchased by the successful construction contractor or substation equipment packager as specified by POWER. Specifications e 138/69kV Power Transformer (1)e Steel Structures (1) e 138/69kV Circuit Breakers(1)e Switchboard Panels(1) e 138/69kV Disconnect Switches(1)©138/69kV Instrument xfmrs (1) SUBTASK 2.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION Responsibility:POWER Review and evaluate manufacturer/vendor technical submittals and proposals and _prepare purchase recommendations for GVEA on the purchase of the major equipment as listed in Subtask 2 |Include all analysis and data generated as part of the review. CROMER SUBTASK 2.3 SUBMITTAL REVIEW Responsibility:POWER Review the manufacturer's approval drawings and data submittals.Verify manufacturer compliance with the technical specifications,outline drawings,and technical submittals. Provide additional information for the vendor as needed to clarify specifications. Provide technical support for GVEA during manufacture.Compare the technical specifications with vendor information and identify known problems which may arise during installation.Review equipment test reports prior to installation. Provide for design personnel to witness factory testing of equipment on an as- requested time and expense basis. CLIMER TASK 3 SUBSTATION LAYOUT Responsibility:POWER Objective:Determination of the detailed physical configuration of the station. Design of a reliable and efficient station ground system.Development of a reliable and functional structural system for the station including foundations. Key Elements:Development of the Station Plans,Elevations and Sections, Foundation Location Plan,Grounding and Fence Plan,Grounding and Fence Details,Conduit and Cable Trench Plan,Access Road Plan &Profile,Site Preparation Plan and preparation of the Material List. Determination of the extent of grounding required as outlined in IEEE 80 and preparation of the Grounding and Fence Plan. Determination of equipment and line loads,structure layout,coordination of structure layout to meet size requirements,and preparation of equipment mounting details. Review and evaluation of the Geotechnical Report,for structure and foundation design calculations.Analysis and determination of the required types,loading,and locations of the foundations for each pier,spread footing,or equipment pad. Preparation of Foundation Detail Drawings for each equipment pad and structure pier or spread footing. Task Prerequisites: e Geotechnical Report e Manufacturers'Data e General Arrangement Plans e«One-Line Diagrams CLIWER Task Deliverables: Station Plan Drawings (3) Elevations &Sections (9) Grounding &Fence Plans (3) Grounding &Fence Details (2) Conduit &Trench Plans (3) Conduit Schedule,as Required Catalog Cuts,as Required Nameplate Schedule,as Required Oil Containment Design (1) Cable Schedule,as Required Structure Outline Drawings (6) Foundation Plans (3) Foundation Detail Drawings (6) Site Preparation Plans and Details (4) Material List,as Required CROMER) RNA ANG Ae0 RAsanenn N97 SUBTASK 3.1 PLAN AND SECTIONS Responsibility:POWER Lay out and design the station plans.Prepare a detailed overhead view of the bus arrangement.Show all buses,insulator locations,equipment (switches, transformers,regulators,circuit breakers,etc.),structural bus supports,deadend structures,switch structures,control building,and auxiliary equipment. Prepare the Station Plan and the Elevations and Sections drawings.Show the equipment involved,structures,rigid bus,flexible buswork,connections and details to scale of all equipment and installations.Locate and uniquely identify all material and hardware.Expand significant details,as required,for clarity.Dimension all critical clearances and other special concerns.Incorporate.a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required. Develop a comprehensive Material List indexed to the applicable drawing set. Specify each item with a unique station-specific descriptor,brief description, manufacturer and part number,if applicable,and the quantity of each unit required. Develop a comprehensive Nameplate Schedule indexed to the applicable drawing. Specify each nameplate with a unique station-specific descriptor,text required, color,letter size and height,and quantity of each required. Assemble all catalog cuts derived through the design process in a packet and ensure that each is properly identified and indexed to the drawing set. e Station Plans «Nameplate Schedules e Material Lists ¢Catalog Cuts e Elevations &Sections OPOWER) SUBTASK 3.2 FOUNDATION DESIGN Responsibility;POWER Prepare the Foundation Plans.Locate,with centerline dimensions and spacings, each foundation that is required for the supporting steel structures,equipment pads,and control building.Dimension the Foundation Plan to the station baselines.Individually identify each foundation with a unique station-specific alphanumeric descriptor. Evaluate the structure and equipment loading requirements and design the foundations required for the station.Utilize the foundation requirements for the equipment in conjunction with the Geotechnical Report and recommendations from the soils engineer.Evaluate the data and determine which type of foundation should be used,spread or pier footings. Prepare all input data and perform analysis for the design of the pier and/or spread footings and equipment pads.From the results of the analysis determine the loading,layout,diameter,depth and projection to be used for preparation of the Foundation Detail drawings.Document all analysis and calculations in legible form. Prepare the Foundation Detail drawings.Show all foundations required to support the station structures,bus supports,equipment supports,deadend structures, transformers,circuit breakers,and other structures.Uniquely identify each foundation by an alphanumeric descriptor,such as Al,A2,B2,or C3.Identify the type and purpose of the foundation,the dimensions,the approximate neat line volume of concrete,the anchor bolt requirements,and the type of rebar. Show a typical cross section and a plan view for each foundation.Show the projection and position of the anchor bolts and the arrangement of the rebar,the outside dimensions of the foundations,the top view of the rebar,the anchor bolt arrangement,and the relative spacing of the rebar cage to the anchor bolts. @ZQWER)IME EOS Perform analysis for the design ofthe oil containment structure.Include the details of the fabric liners or the concrete basinin with the detailed foundation drawings. Include details for sealing the containment,oil/water separators,or additional items required. Develop a comprehensive,Foundation Design Tabulation indexed to the applicable drawing.Specify the foundation descriptor,unit quantity,brief description,neat line approximate cubic yardage of concrete required,individually and collectively by foundation type,and the anchor bolt identification number.Incorporate a drawing specific legend and applicable notes,as required. SUBTASK 3.3 GROUNDING &FENCE PLAN Responsibility:POWER Review the system electrical data and the Geotech Report.Analyze the field resistivity data.Design the station ground grid to provide the necessary safety protection utilizing the equations in [EEE-80 and the measured soil resistivity. Prepare the Substation Grounding and Fence Plan drawing.Show the basic ground grid,grounding conductor sizes,jumpers to equipment,structures that are to be grounded,fence grounding locations,position of ground rods,and connection details.Include taps or jumpers for attaching all metal items in the station that require grounding;such as surge arresters,bus support columns,metal buildings,all equipment and the fence.Expand significant details as required for clarity and for ease of interpretation Lay out the station fence.Show a dimensioned view of the station fence location with such details as may be required such as gate locations.Locate such additional fence mounted equipment as "Danger"and "High-Voltage”signs,hot stick storage canister,etc.Incorporate the fence plan on the Grounding and Fence Plan drawing.Incorporate a drawing specific legend and applicable notes,as required. Prepare a Grounding and Fence Details drawing including fencing and gate materials and installation details Show all details of the fence grounding system OTOIWER/ including gate and line post attachment details.Expand significant details as required for clarity and ease of interpretation.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required., Develop a comprehensive Material List,indexed to the applicable drawing set. Specify each item with a unique station-specific descriptor,brief description, manufacturer,part number,if applicable,and quantity of units required. SUBTASK 3.4 CABLE&CONDUIT Responsibility:POWER Determine the control and station service cabling requirements based upon the Design Criteria,Major Equipment Specifications,Relaying and Control,SCADA, and Communications requirements.Identify the devices to be interconnected,the number of conductors per cable,cable type,and conductor size,with sufficient accuracy to size the conduit and cable trench. Evaluate the cable types available and select the control and power cables to be specified,based on voltage,installation,operating and ambient temperatures and such other requirements as may be applicable to an RC application.Develop the Cable Schedule.Specify the unique station-specific descriptor,conductor wire count,size,voltage and type,a brief description of the origin and destination of the circuit. Develop a comprehensive Conduit Schedule indexed to the applicable drawing. Specify the conduit descriptor,size and cable circuits. Develop the Substation Conduit Plan drawings.Utilize the Foundation Plan as the base and locate and identify each conduit route and riser with a unique station- specific descriptor.Expand significant details as required for clarity and ease of interpretation.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required. eeeeeeee ee ee ee 94 CPIWER Determine the cable trench size,layout,and location as dictated by the unique requirements of the station.Incorporate the routing of the cable trench on the Foundation Plan Drawing. SUBTASK 3.5 STRUCTURE DESIGN Responsibility:POWER Review the Design Criteria and determine the structure material,shape,size,finish, and the loading conditions anticipated.Consider seismic,wind,support,and conductor takeoff loading.Develop the ground work required for structure design and detailing of particular elements. Prepare Substation Structure Outline drawings for steel design and fabrication. _Show equipment and conductor loads and where they are applied,shapes,material, all dimensional configurations,and all mounting holes for switches or any other devices that are to be mounted on the structures. Require that the supplier document all analyses and calculations in legible form. Indicate which loading conditions controlled for each design area and provide a summary description of all controlling data. Provide technical support during fabrication.Identify known problems which may arise during fabrication.Coordinate the resolution of problems associated with installation. SUBTASK 3.6 SITE PREPARATION Responsibility:POWER Review the geotechnical data and determine the type and extent of the existing soil material.Review the topographic manuscripts and identify the drainage considerations especially mitigating permafrost locations identified by the geotech report.Utilize the topographic manuscripts and the Geotechnical Report to design CORQUER the site and to develop the site preparation plan.Develop and balance the cut and fill quantities to achieve the required grade. Prepare the Substation Site Preparation Plan drawing.Show the original contours as dashed lines and the final grade contours as solid lines and show all details for the drainage facilities such as oil containment,drainage ditches,water diversions and any additional drainage control that may be required,as well as surfacing and landscaping requirements and retaining walls.Expand any details required for clarity and incorporate a drawing specific legend and applicable notes. Determine the access road route and helipad on aerial photographs,planimetric drawings,and/or the topographic map.Survey the horizontal location of the access road centerline.Tie all horizontal and vertical surveys to project datum. Reduce centerline horizontal and vertical survey data.Provide a tabulated list of surveyed centerline points,coordinates,stationing,and elevations. Since POWER cannot know the length of the access road at this time,POWER will negotiate a not to exceed price for access road and helipad engineering after the length has been determined.Negotiated price for access road may include additional geotechnical and survey services. Prepare the Access Road Plan and Profile Drawing.Show existing features and items to be installed or constructed (culverts and drainage ditches,etc.).Specify the roadway width,show road cross-sections,surfacing sections,culvert specifications,drainage ditches,and typical cut and fill sections. CLQWER m aA TASK 4 SUBSTATION CONTROL & RELAYING Responsibility:POWER Objective:Detailed design of the relaying,control,and metering,and preparation of switchboard panels and equipment wiring diagrams.Definition of the SCADA and communication interface with the station equipment. Key Elements:Design and preparation of specific schemes and selection of relaying,control,and metering.Development of the SCADA Point Schedule and design and detailed wiring for the SCADA interface. Task Prerequisites: e One-Line e Manufacturer's Data Task Deliverables: e One-Line Diagrams (3) e Three-Line Diagrams (11) e DC Schematics (11) e Annunciator Schematics (4) e«Switchboard Panel Layouts (3) e«Catalog Cuts e Nameplate Schedule e Relay Settings for new Stations System One-Line System Studies Provided by GVEA Control Panel Wiring Diagrams (internals by Fabricator)[14] External Equipment Wiring Diagrams (16) Material List SCADA Points List (2) SVS Interface Racks (2) CLIMER SUBTASK 4.1 STATION PROTECTION ANALYSIS Responsibility:POWER Analyze the protection,control,and metering schemes outlined in the Design Criteria and the One-Line Diagrams.Check that the schemes as outlined will coordinate with the system and the GVEA's operating procedures.Select protective and auxiliary relay types which have the necessary features to enable the schemes to function as intended. Review the proposed station equipment ratings to ensure that equipment will support the protection and metering schemes.Check the current rating (continuous,interrupting),instrumentation transformer accuracy class and burden, overload capabilities,and auxiliary features.Revise the protection,control,and metering schemes;or replace or add equipment to ensure safe and efficient operation of the station. Assemble all catalog cuts derived through the design process in a packet and ensure that each is properly identified.Utilize the catalog cuts during the design of the detailed schematics and wiring.Additionally the catalog cuts will be used to ensure that the correct device is procured after the relay coordination has been completed. Finalize the One-Line Diagram.Show major equipment such as transformers, circuit breakers,RC equipment,disconnect switches,arresters,and other protective devices.Show CT and VT locations and ratings,equipment (relays, control switches,etc.)identified by.standard ANSI device function numbers, metering,indicating instruments,and control devices.Show the CT and VT secondary circuit connections to devices Show the protection,control,and metering functions by the use of dashed lines.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required mem een cn ee ee uawo9e WOWER/ SUBTASK 4.2 SCHEMATIC &THREE-LINE DRAWINGS Responsibility:POWER Prepare the Three-Line diagrams.Show the major equipment deriving input from bushing current transformers.Show all CTs and VTs and the terminal connections required.Show all three (3)phases,phase rotation,phase connections of the buses,phase connections to instrument transformers,and interconnections to relaying,metering,and indicating instruments.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required. Prepare the DC Schematic drawings.Include relays,control switches,control contacts,SCADA RTU status inputs,and DC panel interconnections.Show contact developments of all control switches indicating the terminal connections and state of the contacts for each switch position.Prepare a separate drawing for each protective device (breaker,circuit switcher,recloser,etc.),motor operated switch,or relay function (bus or transformer lockout,etc.).Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required. Prepare the Annunciator Schematic Drawing.Show the interconnection of the alarm contacts with the alarm indicating device (annunciator,light,buzzer,etc.) and/or SCADA input,reset devices,conditional status contacts,and the alarm circuit power supply.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes, as required. SUBTASK 4.3.CONTROL PANELS Responsibility;POWER Review the Design Criteria and determine the control panel arrangement,dual, duplex,etc.Layout the control switchboard panels.Determine the placement, logically,operationally and electrially,of all control,protection,and metering devices on the panels. CRUE Prepare Switchboard Panel Assembly drawings.Show plan and elevation details, all control devices,metering,relays and indicating lights.Locate and uniquely identify all material and hardware.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required. Specify that the panel fabricator prepare control panel wiring diagrams.Organize the required terminal blocks by panels and function (CT shorting type,voltage input,breaker contacts,trip circuits,close circuits,auxiliary circuits,RTU circuits, etc.)Show all wiring terminations required for each panel.Clearly designate the destination of the wire at each terminal.Place all wiring from yard equipment or from other panels on one side of the terminal block and all wiring to the panel devices on the other side as much as is practical.Show a maximum of two (2) terminations per terminal.Designate the panel name or number at the top of each page. Develop a comprehensive nameplate schedule indexed to the applicable,drawing. Specify each nameplate with a unique station-specific descriptor,text required, letter size and height,and quantity of each required. Develop a comprehensive Material List indexed to the applicable drawing.Specify each item with a unique station-specific descriptor,brief description,manufacturer, and part number,if applicable,and the quantity of each unit required. SUBTASK 4.4 WIRING DIAGRAMS Responsibility:POWER Prepare Equipment Wiring Diagrams for the station equipment.Show external terminal block connections,jumpers,and:any internal wiring changes to the manufacturer's wiring required.The manufacturer's internal wiring will not be reproduced except where wiring changes are necessary. Equipment wiring diagrams will be prepared for equipment such as power transformers,power circuit breakers,current transformers,voltage transformers. motor operated disconnect switches,coupling capacitor voltage transformers. POWER communications equipment,etc.Where appropriate more than one piece of equipment will be shown on a drawing.Indicate the RC interface points for control. SUBTASK 4.5 SCADA Responsibility:POWER Develop the SCADA Points List,list the control,status,analog,and pulse accumulator points required for the station.Specify the integration of theSCADA system with the total station control.Determine if any interposing relays are required. No sequence of events or digital fault recorders have been allocated for in POWER's budget. SUBTASK 4.6 RELAY COORDINATION Responsibility:POWER Review the preliminary design and the Design Criteria.Perform a coordination study and determine the proper relay settings and protection equipment ratings required for the station.Utilize the GVEA-provided Short Circuit Study and a Load Flow Study and identify the ranyes of load and fault current anticipated at the station. Utilizing GVEA-furnished system study data,system maps,relay settings of electrically interrelated circuit breakers and/or other protective devices,and specifications of electrically interrelated circuit breakers or other protective devices along with data from the substation design effort develop settings or make the appropriate selection for the followiny CODOWER e Time Overcurrent Phase Relays e Synchronization Check Relay e Transformer Differential Relays "+e Impedance Type Distance e Impedance Type Distance Three-Three-Zone Relays Zone,Ground Relays e Bus Differential Relay e Time Overcurrent Ground Relays Document all analysis and calculations in legible form.Indicate which condition controlled for each design area and provide a summary description of all controlling data. No evaluation of the relay settings for the existing line have been included in this proposal. OLIWER TASK 5 SVS AND SUBSTATION CONTROL.BUILDING Responsibility:POWER ) Objective:Development of a reliable and functional SVS and Substation control building including building arrangement,AC &DC station service,and lighting & HVAC.Specify adequate room in the RC contract to allow for one building to accommodate both substation equipment and all requisite RC gear. Key Elements:Determination of the SVS and Substation control building layout,both functionally and electrically,control building and station AC &DC power requirements,and have the RC contractor be responsible for the building lighting;climate control,and AC and DC equipment. Task Prerequisites: e Switchboard Panel Assembly e General Arrangement Drawings Manufacturers'Data Task Deliverables: ¢Control Building Plan (2) e Material List «AC &DC Supply Drawing Plan,tor Substation Portion (4) Conduit Schedule Cable Schedule Conduit Plan Control Building Lighting,for Substation Portion (2) CLOMER SUBTASK 5.1 BUILDING ARRANGEMENT Responsibility:POWER Lay out and design the Control Building area for the substation portion of the building.Review the instrumentation and control equipment drawings and interconnection diagrams and determine equipment placement and _space requirements.Integrate the access and operational requirements with equipment considerations to establish the building layout and size;assess the environmental loadings,weather conditions,and aesthetic considerations and determine the type of structure to be specified. Determine the size and physical arrangement of the switchboard and other supporting devices,such as RTU's,communication panels,door openings,battery chargers (number and size),battery system,the cable trench entrance (floor or overhead),and other equipment. Show the required minimum floor space for all equipment within the control building.Show the control building grounding requirements.Expand any details required for clarity and ease of interpretation.Incorporate a drawing specific legend and applicable notes. Develop a comprehensive Material List indexed to the applicable drawing.Specify each item with a unique station-specific descriptor,brief description,manufacturer and part number,if applicable,and the unit quantity required. SUBTASK 5.2 AC &DC STATION SERVICE Responsibility:POWER Analyze the substation AC &DC Requirements.Determine the substation DC load,include the operation of all protective equipment (power circuit breakers, circuit switches,reclosers,etc)and motor operated switches,control circuits, emergency lighting,equipment power supplies,and indicating and alarm equipment.Determine the substation AC load,including station yard lighting. CLIUER Prepare the substation AC and DC Supply Drawing.Show the AC station service panel layout.Identify the loads served from the AC panel.Show the DC panel layout.Identify the loads served from the DC panel.Include spare breakers on each panel.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required.It is assumed that the Igloo Substation will require an engine generator set for back-up AC Station Service. Provide AC and DC Station Service loading and requirements to the RC turnkey contractor. SUBTASK 5.3.LIGHTING&HVAC Responsibility:POWER Consider and evaluate the Building Lighting System.Ensure that the panels and desk area,if applicable,are adequately lighted.Provide for switched AC lighting and a light over the door operated by a photo cell.Include emergency DC lights. Provide HVAC loading to the RC turnkey contractor.Consider the electronic equipment operating temperature range.Include heat loss/gain calculations,if applicable.Include the appropriate heating/air conditioning equipment in the Building Plan &Section Drawing. Prepare the Control Building Substation Area Lighting Plan.Include both AC and DC lights.Determine the requirements for and location of all AC and DC light switches and photo cell controls.Include AC convenience power outlets for the building,with GFI breakers for protection.Incorporate a drawing-specific legend and applicable notes,as required. CRIMES TASK 6 SUBSTATION REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Review of,revision where required,and subsequent approval by GVEAof the following: e Construction Specs e Construction Drawings Key Elements:Preparation of Construction Specifications,compilation and assembly of the Construction Specifications and Drawings documents and GVEA's review,revision where required and subsequent approval of such documents. Construction Specifications will be prepared using POWER's format. Preparation of Bid Unit Descriptions,Bid Unit Schedule,Engineer's Estimate,and the provision of engineering support at both the Pre-bid and Pre-construction Conferences and during the contractor selection and construction phases of the Project. Task Prerequisite: ¢Completed Design Documents Task Deliverables: e REA Form 831 or 764 (1)e REA Approval of Design (1) e Construction Specs (1)e REA Form 254 (1) e Bid Unit Schedule (1)e Engineering Support During 'e Engineer's Construction Estimate (1)Construction ¢Bid Unit Descriptions (1)¢«Close-Out Documents (1) LOWEREAQINEE429 SUBTASK 6.1 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS Responsibility:POWER Prepare one (1)Construction Specification for the substations.Include general requirements as well as specific sections on site work,concrete,structure erection, insulation,painting,equipment installation,switches and fuses,conduit and fittings,wire and cable,buswork,connections,instrumentation,grounding and testing. Incorporate all site specific environmental conditions and GVEA/agency requirements that would affect the method or sequence of construction. Compile and assemble two (2)reproducible copies of the Construction Specifications and Drawings document.This Document will include the Construction Specification,Structure Drawings,and Reference Drawings. SUBTASK 6.2 DESIGN REVIEW Responsibility:GVEA /POWER Schedule and attend a meeting at GVEA's offices,to review the Construction Specification and Drawings documents.Forward the appropriate drawings,data, and documents and a proposed meeting agenda to GVEA sufficiently in advance to allow for adequate review by GVEA Incorporate such changes as GVEA may request which are consistent with the scope of work defined in this Work Plan.Summarize the meeting minutes and route copies to all concerned parties for review. After the GVEA design review,forward the documents,including form 831 or 764,to REA for review and approval C2IMER SUBTASK 6.3 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT Responsibility:POWER Develop the Bid Unit Descriptions required for the Construction Contract.Briefly categorize and describe the particular work element and payment basis. Prepare the Bid Unit Schedule,tabulate and identify the bid units by alphanumeric descriptor and title.Identify the quantity (per unit or per lot)of each unit and allow for the inclusion of construction unit labor costs,material costs,and labor and material cost extension. Prepare the preliminary Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate from the bid units that can be utilized to evaluate the contractor's proposals.Include unit prices for labor and material individually,both GVEA-furnished and/or contractor-furnished, and collectively.Develop an extension based on the quantity required for each unit. Attend both the Pre-bid Conference and the Pre-construction Conference and provide technical support as required.Provide technical support during the addendum/clarification phase (bid window)of the bidding process. Analyze and evaluate the contractor proposals received and make recommendation to GVEA for the award of each Contract,include all back-up data,calculations, assumptions,and any necessary explanations. Review equipment and material test reports for all equipment and material required.Coordinate the resolution of any problems associated with the equipment and material tests on an as-requested basis and per the attached Schedule of Charges. Incorporate the changes received during construction and furnish one (1)complete set of mylar reproducibles and one (1)set of electronic files of all drawings to reflect the "record drawing"condition when the project is completed. CLIMER TASK 7 COMMISSIONING (OPTIONAL) Responsibility:POWER Objective:Develop static and functional test procedures to establish that each system component is wired correctly and performing properly before energization. Key Elements:Development of test procedures,perform detailed equipment check-out,perform system function tests,and prepare the final report. Task Prerequisites: e Construction Drawings e Completed Station Construction e Accessible Stable 120VAC,1500W Source to Power Test Equipment Task Deliverables: e Test Procedures e Functional Tests e Acceptance Tests e Final Report e Equipment Check-Out Note:No budget has been allowed for by POWER in our base proposal. CLQWER SUBTASK 7.1 MOBILIZATION Obtain equipment data from GVEA and/or equipment manufacturers to develop test plans following review of equipment instruction,operation and installation manuals.Procure specialized test equipment and mobilize the two member test crew to each site. SUBTASK 7.2.ON-SITE COMMISSIONING Perform the following commissioning tests on equipment installed at the Substation Project site. POWER CIRCUIT BREAKERS .CT Ratio and Polarity Test .¢Insulation Resistance Test e Contact Resistance (DUCTOR) e CT and Control Wiring Verification per Design Documents e Functional checkout of electrical and mechanical controls and interlocks e Hygrometer Test (If applicable) fae e Insulation Resistance Test e Contact Resistance (DUCTOR) e CT and Control Wiring Verification per Design Documents e Functional checkout of electrical and mechanical controls and interlocks POWER TRANSFORMER e Insulation Power Factor Test (Bushings and Windings) ¢Insulation Resistance (Windings and Core) e Transformer Turns Ratio (TTR) e Current Transformer Ratio,Polarity,Saturation e Control Wiring Verification POWER e Functional checkout of control,alarm and cooling circuits e Oil Dielectric Test 3-PHASE LOAD TAP CHANGERS e Insulation Power Factor Test (Windings) e Insulation Resistance (Windings) e Turns Ratio e Control Wiring Verification per Design Documents e Functional checkout of control,alarm and cooling circuits PROTECTIVE RELAYS e Perform manufacturer's recommended acceptance tests e Set protective relays including applicable instrument transformers e Verify control wiring per design documents e Perform functional checkout (trip checks)of protective relay and control circuits METERING e Perform manufacturer's recommended acceptance tests. e Calibrate meters to required accuracy. e Verify control!wiring for design documents. GROUND GRID INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT e Measure ground grid resistance utilizing Fall-of-Potential test methodology ENERGIZATION «Assist GVEA personnel in station energization and _post-energization -monitoring. CRUE SUBTASK 7.3 DEMOBILIZATION AND FINAL REPORT Assemble field test data into report format and summarize tests performed and corresponding results.POWER will also provide GVEA with a markup set of station drawings.Deliver the final report to the GVEA. CLIWER TASK 8 REACTIVE COMPENSATION ENGINEERING Responsibility:POWER we Objective:Determination of the size and type and turnkey specification of the two required reactive compensation installations. Key Elements:Completion of system studies to determine the equipment ratings and specific requirements,preparation of turnkey technical specifications, evaluation of vendor submittals,preparation of recommendations for purchase and the approval or denial of manufacturer's drawings and data submittals.GVEA will issue and receive bids. Task Prerequisites: e System Studies Provided by GVEA e System One-Line e Manufacturer's Submittals Task Deliverables: e Turnkey Technical Specifications *Purchase Recommendations e Approval Drawings @2QWER) SUBTASK 8.1 SIZING SUPPORT Responsibility:POWER Provide technical assistance,computer support,vendor contact,EPRI contact,and other services as may be requested by GVEA on a time and expense basis. Perform system studies as required to determine the size and type of reactive compensation required.Include studies to determine the benefits of a Battery Energy Storage (BES)system versus conventional Static Var Systems SVS). Note:No time has been budgeted by POWER for this subtask. SUBTASK 8.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Responsibility:POWER Prepare Technical Turkey Specifications for the two required reactive compensation stations.Specify design,performance requirements,operational and maintenance features,field service engineer,warranty,assembly drawings, compliance submittals,and construction requirements.Develop a list of qualified vendors. Prepare Construction Specifications for the RC station.Include general requirements as well as specific sections on site work,concrete,structure erection, insulation,painting,equipment installation,switches and fuses,conduit and fittings,wire and cable,buswork.connections,instrumentation,grounding and testing. Incorporate all site specific environmental conditions and GVEA/Agency requirements that would affect the method or sequence of construction. Prepare the preliminary Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate.Include unit prices for labor and material individually.and collectively.Develop an extension based on the quantity required for each unit Ne @PDOWERENNEOE Provide GVEA one (1)unbound copy of the Technical Specification in POWER's standard format.GVEA will provide terms and conditions,make requisite number of copies,bind,issue and receive bids. Revise Technical Specifications to incorporate such changes as are deemed necessary based on the review of manufacturer/vendor technical submittals.It is understood that such revisions will be consistent with the scope of work defined in this Work Plan. Provide GVEA one (1)unbound copy of the revised Technical specification in POWER's standard format.Compile and assemble one (1)set of reference drawings from the substation for incorporation into the bid documents.GVEA will provide terms and conditions,make requisite number of copies,bind,issue and receive bids. Note:POWER's budget assumes that the sample specifications for the Kenai SVS's and/or EPRI/HECO BES will be available in an acceptable electronic format and may be used as the basis for the preparation of turnkey specifications. SUBTASK 8.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION Responsibility:POWER Review and evaluate manufacturer/vendor technical submittals.Identify those proposals which do not meet the minimum criteria.Evaluate proposed alternates for possible inclusion in the final specifications.Eliminate portions of the specifications which may limit the number of bidders to an unacceptable number if performance is not sacrificed. Review and evaluate manufacturer/vendor technical submittals and commercial proposals and prepare purchase recommendations for GVEA on the purchase of RC installations.Include all analvsis and data generated as a part ofthe review. CLQWER SUBTASK 8.4 SUBMITTAL REVIEW Responsibility:POWER Review the manufacturer's approval drawings and data submittals.Verify manufacturer compliance with the technical specifications.Provide technical support to GVEA during manufacture and construction.Compare technical specifications with vendor information and identify known problems which may arise during construction.Review equipment test reports prior to installation and energization. Provide for engineering personnel to witness factory testing of equipment on an as- requested time and expense basis. Note:It is assumed that the submittal review portion of the reactive compensation stations will be limited to review of station physical drawings, such as station layout and elevations,grounding and fencing,and site preparation,interconnection wiring diagrams,manufacturer's submittals for major equipment such and transformer and circuit breakers,and the control building.No time has been included to review submittals for control logic or specialty equipment. POWER)CF el TASK 9 SVS CONTROL MODIFICATIONS Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Determination of the requirements and turnkey specification for modification or replacement ofthe controls of two existing SVS installations. Key Elements:Completion of system studies to determine the equipment ratings and specific requirements,preparation of turnkey technical specifications, evaluation of vendor submittals,preparation of recommendations for purchase and the approval or denial of manufacturer's drawings and data submittals.GVEA will issue and receive bids. Task Prerequisites: e System Studies Provided by GVEA e System One-Line e Manufacturer's Submittals Task Deliverables: e Turnkey Technical Specifications e Purchase Recommendations e Approval Drawings LOWER/ SUBTASK 9.1 STUDY SUPPORT Responsibility:POWER Provide technical assistance,computer support,vendor contact,EPRI contact,and other services as may be requested by GVEA on a time and expense basis. Perform system studies as required to determine the specific performance criteria for the existing controls to function properly.Determine the ability of the existing controls to meet this performance criteria. Note:No time has been budgeted by POWER for this subtask. SUBTASK 9.2.SPECIFICATION PREPARATION Responsibility:POWER Develop Technical Turnkey Specifications for modification or replacement of the controls at two existing SVS stations.Specify design,performance requirements, operational and maintenance features,field service engineer,warranty,and compliance submittals.Develop a list of qualified vendors. Provide GVEA one (1)unbound copy of the final specification in POWER's standard format.GVEA wiil provide terms and conditions,make requisite number of copies,bind,issue and receive bids SUBTASK 9.3.TECHNICAL EVALUATION Responsibility:POWER Review and evaluate manufacturer/vendor technical submittals and proposals and prepare purchase recommendations for GVEA on the purchase of SVS control modification or replacement.Include all analysis and data generated as a part of the review. OPQWER) SUBTASK 9.4 SUBMITTAL REVIEW Responsibility:POWER Review the manufacturer's approval drawings and data submittals.Verify manufacturer compliance with the technical specifications.Provide technical support to GVEA during manufacture and installation.Compare technical specifications with vendor information and identify known problems which may arise during installation.Review equipment test reports prior to installation and energization. Provide for engineering personnel to witness factory testing of equipment on an as- requested time and expense basis. @DOwEs/ SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES -STATION DESIGN Documents: e Station Design Criteria (1) e Geotechnical Report (1) ¢Bid Unit Descriptions (1) e Bid Unit Schedule (1) e Survey/Topographic Data (1) e Site Topographic Map e REA Form 254 (1) e REA Form 265 (1) e Cost Estimate (2) Drawings: One-Line Diagram (3) Station Plan (3) Foundation Plan (3) Grounding &Fence Plan (3) Conduit Plan (3) Structure Outline Drawings (6) e Site Preparation Plan (4) e AC &DC Supply Drawing (4) e DC Schematic (11) e Switchboard Panel Assembly (3) Specifications: e Major Equipment Specs (6) e Construction Specs (1) ¢Structure Fabrication Specs (1) e Control House Specs (1) Miscellaneous: e Catalog Cuts e Nameplate Schedule (2) e Cable Schedule ¢Topographic Data (1) Commissionina:. e Acceptance Tests e Equipment Checkout e Functional Tests Equipment Cost Estimates (6) Purchase Recommendations (6) Relay Settings for new substations(1) SCADA Point List (2) Engineer's Construction Estimate (2) Design Manual (1) REA Form 831 or 764 (1) REA Approval Documents (2) Control Building Plan (2) Control Bldg.Lighting Plan (2) General Arrangement Plan (3) Elevations and Sections (9) Foundation Detail Drawings (6) Grounding &Fence Details (2) Cable Trench Plan &Details (2) Equipment Wiring Diagram (16) Three-Line Diagram (11) Switchboard Fabrication Specs (1) SVS Turnkey Specs (1) SVS Control Modification Specs (1) Material List Conduit Schedule (2) Approval Drawings Test Procedures Final Report CDOWER PROCUREMENT TASK 10 PROCUREMENT INITIATION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Identification and definition of project-specific procurement procedures and development of the documents required for equipment and material procurement.Identification of qualified vendors who can supply equipment and materials to satisfy the project requirements.Review,revision where required,and subsequent approval by GVEA of the procurement procedures,procurement documents,and the approved Vendor List. Key Elements:Consultation with GVEA on the procurement procedures and procurement documents.Coordination with design in development of the Equipment and Material Lists and the approved Vendor Lists. Task Prerequisites: e Material List e Performance Specifications e Equipment List TaskDeliverables: e Procurement Procedures e Vendor Lists «Procurement Documents SLOWER) SUBTASK 10.1 PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES Responsibility:POWER Review GVEA's current procurement process and procedures,and conduct such additional research as may be necessary to identify and confirm the project procurement requirements.Coordinate with GVEA to ensure compatibility with existing procedures.Gather all GVEA data,specifications,and requirements that apply to the project.Compile all GVEA drawings and such other data as may be required for procurement.Refer to POWER's Procurement Guidelines to develop the project procurement process. Define the Procurement Criteria.Include the delivery point,date required, Equipment and Material Lists,bonus/penalty considerations,testing required, payment procedures,equipment and material availability,GVEA requirements, approval process,and the bidding and construction schedules. SUBTASK 10.2 PROCUREMENT IDENTIFICATION Responsibility:POWER Review the preliminary Equipment and Material Lists received from design. Identify the individual procurement efforts required,including: SUBSTATION e Transformer «Switchboards e Breakers e Instrument Transformers e Structural Steel Identify the following dates:Request for Quotation release,bid opening,GVEA award,Purchase Order release,approval drawing review,expediting schedule, shipment,delivery,material acceptance,equipment/material transfer,payment, close-out,the status of any claims,and miscellaneous remarks. COPIER In conjunction with GVEA,develop a list of an average of three (3)qualified vendors for each equipment and material procurement identified.Prequalify procurement-specific vendors on the basis oftheir equipment and material quality, ability to deliver on time,past warranty performance and overall responsiveness. SUBTASK 10.3 PROCUREMENT REVIEW Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Schedule and conduct a teleconference with GVEA to review the preliminary procurement material.Forward the procurement procedures,preliminary Procurement Documents,Vendor Lists and the proposed meeting agenda to GVEA sufficiently in advance to allow for adequate review by GVEA.| Incorporate such changes as GVEA may request that are consistent with the scope of work defined in this Work Plan. Secure GVEA approval of the Procurement Procedures,preliminary procurement documents,and the Vendor Lists Summarize the meeting minutes and route copies to all concerned parties for review. CLIWER TASK 11 VENDOR SELECTION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Selectionof qualified vendors in order to obtain the equipment and material specified at the best overall value for GVEA considering both cost and delivery dates in relationship to the project schedule.Management of the vendor selection process to insure a valid procurement process. Key Elements:Preparation of the final Request for Quotation (RFQ),prompt response to Bidder's questions,accurate bid evaluation,and rapid GVEA approval of the successful Bidder.GVEA preparation and execution of the Purchase Orders and preparation and distribution of the Notification Letters and Certified Bid Tabulations. Task Prerequisites: e Request for Quotation ¢Cost Estimates e Vendor List Task Deliverables: e«Purchase Recommendations e Purchase Orders (GVEA) ¢Quote Tabulations ¢Certified Bid Tabulations e Equipment List ¢Notification Letters (GVEA) e Material List CTILMER SUBTASK 11.1 REQUEST FOR QUOTATION Responsibility:GVEA Review the revised and updated Equipment and Material Lists received from design.Revise the Request for Quotation (RFQ)to incorporate all changes in quantity and the GVEA-approved Performance Specifications.Print,bind,and distribute the required Request for Quotations (RFQs)and cover letters to the applicable prequalified vendors.Update the Procurement Tracking Program. Prepare and issue such clarifications and,if necessary,bid addenda as may be required during each specific bidding period.Require that bidder's questions be submitted in writing prior to a pre-established cut-off date for each procurement effort.Establish the cut-off date to allow sufficient time to respond in writing prior to the time for submission of bids. Note:No time has been budgeted by POWER for this subtask. SUBTASK 11.2 BID OPENING Responsibility;GVEA/POWER Receive and log the vendor substation major equipment submittals.Open the vendor submittals on the date and at the time specified for each specific procurement.Review the vendor submittals for compliance and check for completeness and numerical accuracy Compile and tabulate all quotations received for each procurement to facilitate comparison and evaluation of the apparent low bidder.Coordinate with design and evaluate the submittals for compliance with the Performance Specifications. Based on total cost,schedule,warranty,and past performance,analyze and evaluate the vendor quotations.Make recommendation to GVEA,including back- up data,for the award of each procurement CDQWER Prepare priced and delivery-dated Equipment and Material Lists of GVEA- furnished items.Forward the priced and delivery-dated Equipment and Material Lists to construction management and procurement for inclusion in the Construction Contract and to serve as the basis for expediting and receiving the equipment and material deliveries. SUBTASK 11.3 PURCHASE ORDER ISSUE Responsibility:GVEA Review any subsequent revised and updated Equipment and Material Lists received from design.Incorporate all changes in quantity and/or the Performance Specifications in the applicable Purchase Order for each procurement. Compile and incorporate each successful Vendor's data in the specific Purchase Order.Prepare the Notification Letters,and notify all unsuccessful bidders ofthe awards. Note:No time has been budgeted by POWER for this subtask. @ DOWER)EMINEM TASK 12 EXPEDITING &RECEIVING Responsibility:GVEA Objective:Delivery of the specified equipment and material on time and at the specified locations.Resolution of claims and recommendation to GVEA relative to Vendor payment.Expeditious transfer of all equipment and material to the Construction Contractor's custody. Key Elements:Review of approval drawings and data,schedule maintenance, preparation and submittal of equipment and material procurement status reports, change order management,and the provision of test witnessing and inspection services. Inspection,inventory,and receipt of undamaged equipment and material; preparation of shipping claims,formal transfer of the equipment and material to the Construction Contractor,close-out of the procurement process;and preparation of permanent documentation. Task Prerequisite: e Purchase Orders Task Deliverables: e Approval Drawings «Receivers e Delivery Status Reports «Payment Recommendations e Change Orders e Manufacturers'Drawings &Manuals e Test/Inspection Reports «Summary Report Note:.No time has been budgeted for by POWER for this task. CLIMER SUBTASK 12.1. EXPEDITING Responsibility:GVEA When required,prepare and process Change Orders due to modifications to the Performance Specifications,changes in delivery schedules and/or unit quantities. Manage the review of vendor drawings and data submittals.Insure prompt return of the approval drawings and complete documentation of the submittal process. Coordinate with design. Make recommendations for,and provide as directed,factory inspection,testing and/or expediting.Arrange for and coordinate inspection of the equipment at the manufacturer's facility and/or witness the required performance testing.Document the results of the testing and inspection and prepare the Test/Inspection Report. SUBTASK 12.2 RECEIVING Responsibility:GVEA Inventory and inspect all equipment and material for visible damage,upon receipt and prior to releasing the shipper.Verify the equipment and material condition and determine that all items are accounted for.Prepare and process such shipping claims as may be required. Prepare the applicable equipment and material forms for each delivery and transfer custody of the equipment and material to the Construction Contractor.Require that the Construction Contractor sizn and date for each equipment item and material unit as a condition of the reiease of such to the Contractor.Coordinate with construction management. Distribute all manufacturers'drawings,manuals,data,etc.Handle all correspondence with suppliers regarding coordination,approval,delivery,etc Maintain files of manufacturers'drawings for transmittal at the proper time to the field inspectors,construction contractor,and design engineer. BPOWER) CONSTRUCTION TASK _13 CM INITIATION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Identification and definition of the Construction Management Procedures,preparation of the Construction Contract,Bidders List,and the Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate.Review,revision where required and subsequent approval by GVEA of the project Construction Management Procedures,Construction Contract,Bidders List and the Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate. Key Elements:A Construction Contract tailored to the project allows concentration on potential problems unique to the project.A formal written system of documenting construction progress and problems eliminates potential misunderstandings and minimizes Contractor claims. Task Prerequisites: e Construction Bid Units e Material Lists e Equipment List e Engineer's Estimate Task Deliverables: e Construction Cost Estimate e Bidders List «Construction Contract e CM Procedures eee eee mae OLOMEB)ws SUBTASK 13.1 CM PROCEDURES Responsibility:POWER Review and evaluate the proposed construction schedule,project complexity,and constraints and make recommendation to GVEA concerning the number and type of construction contracts to be let. Define the construction management criteria required for the construction management process,including the construction schedule,pre-bid meeting details, construction sequence,etc. Prepare and issue for GVEA review the Construction Management Procedures. Include,the following:contract strategy,form of contract,progress payment procedures,claim and change order procedures,report distribution,contract administration and construction inspection forms and close-out procedures. Define the field office and home office interface.Ensure that the scope and content of this document,as approved by GVEA,serves as the basis for all office and field construction management activities. SUBTASK 13.2 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Review existing contracts,and conduct such additional research as may be necessary to identify and confirm the torm of contract and additional contractual requirements. Compile the input data required tor the Construction Contract,specifically, landowner and agency requirements,stipulations and constraints,access conditions,equipment and material availability,GVEA requirements,contract approval process,and the bidding and construction schedule. eZOWER) Develop the Construction Contract including the Notice and Instructions to Bidders,Contractor's Proposal,Agreement,Schedule,General Conditions,priced and delivery-dated lists for GVEA-furnished equipment,and material and administrative particulars.Develop the construction schedule outline in completed bid unit format for inclusion in the Construction Contract. SUBTASK 13.3 CM REVIEW Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Schedule and conduct a teleconference with GVEA to review the preliminary Construction Management material.Forward the Construction Management Procedures,Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate and the proposed meeting agenda to GVEA sufficiently in advance to allow for adequate review by GVEA. Secure GVEA approval of the Construction Management Procedures.Incorporate changes GVEA may request that are consistent with the scope of work defined in this Work Plan.Summarize the meeting minutes and route copies to all concerned parties for review. CZQWER) TASK 14 CONTRACTOR SELECTION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Familiarize prospective bidders with the project scope and local conditions to minimize claims during the construction phase.Provide all bidders with additional bidding information in order to prevent bidding protests. Key Elements:Preparation and issue of the Notice and Instructions to Bidders, issue of the Contract Documents including the Construction Specifications and Drawings document,and attendance at the Pre-bid Conference.Require that prospective bidders attend the Pre-bid Conference to review the scope of the Project. Preparation and issue of such claritications and addenda as may be required,and attendance at the Bid Opening.Review and evaluation of the bids received and preparation of the Contract Recommendation for GVEA consideration. Task Prerequisites: e Construction Contract e Bidders List e Const.Specs &Drawings e Construction Cost Estimate Task Deliverables (GVEA): e Pre-bid Recap Letter ¢Contract Recommendation e Clarifications &Addenda ¢Notification Letters e Certified Bid Tabulation Task Deliverable (POWER): e Engineering Support and Pre-bid Meeting Attendance Only POWER)re ee) SUBTASK 14.1 NOTICE&INSTRUCTIONS Responsibility:GVEA Prepare and issue the "Notice and Instructions to Bidders."Develop a brief summary of the construction scope and schedule and forward the same to the prequalified bidders as approved by GVEA.Require receipt of a written expression ofintent from the prospective bidders as a condition of their receipt of the bidding documents.If requested,assist GVEA in advertising the proposed construction in the manner required by law. Note:No time has been budgeted for this Subtask. SUBTASK 14.2 PRE-BID CONFERENCE Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Ensure that all Construction Bid Unit quantities,and material and equipment quantities,prices,and delivery dates reflect the most recent information available. Incorporate final revisions or data in the Construction Contract document and the Construction Specifications and Drawings document.GVEA will print and assemble the copies required for the bidding process. Assist GVEA in conducting the Pre-bid Conference.Review the scope of the project.Distribute the bidding documents (Construction Contract,Construction Specifications,and Drawings)at the Pre-bid Conference. GVEA will summarize the Pre-bid Conference discussion in letter format and forward copies to all Pre-bid Conference attendees.Require that the bidders acknowledge receipt of and agreement with the contents of the Pre-bid Conference Recapitulation Letter,in writing,as a condition of the acceptance by GVEA of the bidder's proposal. Prepare,issue,and manage such claritications and bid addenda as may be required during the bidding period.Require that prospective bidders'questions and CLE inquiries be submitted in writing prior to a cutoff date.Establish the cut-off date in order to allow sufficient time to respond in writing,prior to the time for submission of bids.Forward copies of all questions and answers to all prospective bidders. Note:POWER has budgeted for engineer attendance and clarification support only. SUBTASK 14.3.BID OPENING Responsibility:GVEA Conduct a public bid opening at the time and place identified in the contract documents.Perform the preliminary evaluation of the bids for responsiveness, including:total cost,accurate price extensions,bid bond adequacy,valid bidder signatures,exceptions taken and compliance with such additional bid requirements as schedule,labor and equipment rates,proposed field organization,and subcontractors. Note:No time has been budgeted by POWER for this Subtask. OLIMER TASK 15 MOBILIZATION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Evaluation of the apparent low bidder's submittals,insurance certificates,bonds,and schedule prior to execution of the Construction Contract. Verification of the Contractor's stated qualifications.Familiarization of the Construction Contractor's field personnel with project details and administration procedures. Key Elements:Assistance to GVEA in the execution of the Construction Contract,attendance at the Pre-construction Conference,and preparation and issue of the Pre-construction Conference Recapitulation Letter.Preparation of the construction management documents,activation of the Construction Tracking Program,and establishment of the required construction management field facilities. Task Prerequisites:* e Construction Contract e Insurance Certificates e Construction Bonds Task Deliverables (GVEA): e Contract Documents e Precon Recap Letter e Notice of Award Task Deliverables (POWER): e CM Documents e CM Field Facilities CZQWER SUBTASK 15.1 NOTICE OF AWARD Responsibility:GVEA Review the Contractor's Insurance Certificates and Performance and Payment Bonds for compliance with the Construction Contract.Prepare the Notice of Award for signature and forward the same to the successful Contractor.Notify all unsuccessful bidders of the award by letter and include a copy of the Certified Bid Tabulation. Incorporate the successful Contractor's pertinent data,cost proposal and proposed construction schedule in the required number of original "Signature"copies ofthe Construction Contract.Secure GVEA's and the successful Construction Contractor's signatures in the Construction Contract and distribute the required copies to the appropriate individuals.Return the bidding documents and bid bonds to the second and third lowest bidders Note:No time has been budgeted by POWER for this Subtask. SUBTASK 15.2 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Assist GVEA in conducting the Pre-construction Conference.Review key administrative and construction procedures and requirements with the successful Construction Contractor including,bonds and insurance certificates;key technical requirements;landowner and agency requirements,stipulations and constraints, change order procedures;role of field personnel;construction schedule;key POWER,GVEA,and Contractor personnel;progress payment procedures, schedule requirements,material and equipment delivery responsibilities,progress and inspection reports,procedures and distribution GVEA will prepare and issue to the successtul Construction Contractor four (4) copies of the full-sized drawing set znd the construction documents "Approved for Construction."Ensure that all drasinus and documents issued are of the most ODQWER current revision and so dated.Make available additional sets of the full-sized drawings and/or construction documents at cost to the Construction Contractor. GVEA will summarize the Pre-construction Conference discussion in letter format and forward copies to all attendees. SUBTASK 15.3 MOBILIZATION Responsibility;POWER Prepare and issue the construction management documents.Develop CM documents that provide the structure and format for comprehensive construction inspection and contract administration.The construction inspection documents include Daily and Weekly Reports,Material Receipts,Inspection Reports,Safety Violation Reports,and Accident Reports.The Contract Administration documents include Project Log,Progress Reports,Schedule and Progress Payment Reports,Change Orders,and Claims Forms Establish the basic data for the Construction Tracking Program.Review the successful Construction Contractor's proposed construction schedule,developed in bid unit quantities (pay items).Organize the data in computer format and input the Contractor's schedule data. CDQWER TASK 16 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Objective:Maintain control of the construction process through effective office and field administration of contract compliance,change orders,extra claims, schedule maintenance,progress payments and coordination of technical support. Ensure that GVEA is receiving the project quality specified in the Construction Specifications and Drawings,and minimize the time required to resolve contractor questions and problems.Ensure that the project documentation is organized and prepared for the project close-out files. Ensure that the changes and modifications made during construction are recorded on field drawings and the mylar masters are revised accordingly.Verify that Change Orders are incorporated in the appropriate construction documentation. Preparation of final reports to assure proper legal recording and to provide comprehensive documentation.Assembly and archiving of construction documents are in order to be easily available for future retrieval. Perform a pre-energization walk-through of all equipment,instruments,and protective systems in order to provide for a safe and orderly energization of the project. Key Elements:Implementation and operation ofthe construction administration system including contract compliance,schedule maintenance,change order management,document control.claims resolution,review of field reports, coordination of engineering support,progress payments,and status reporting. All construction documents require some degree of interpretation and occasional! modification to accommodate conditions encountered in the field.It is the construction inspector's primary responsibility to anticipate these difficulties and to ensure that solutions are available that minimize delay and extra costs. 2 DOWERomens Implementation and operation of the construction inspection system including the Project Log,Daily Reports,Weekly Reports,compliance monitoring,quality control inspection,claims documentation,material control,and safety/accident reporting. Task Prerequisites: e Contract Documents e CM Documents e Record Drawings Task Deliverables: e Schedule Revisions e Change Orders 'e Damage Claims e Compliance Violations e Progress Payments e Status Reports e Project Log e Violation Reports e Material Receipts e Agency Coordination Assistance Manufacturer's Data Construction Manuals Waiver &Release Progress Reports Inspection Reports Safety Violations Accident Reports Final Inspection Report Record Drawings Close-Out Documents Construction Report Partnering Meeting Backup Inspector Support CTIWER) SUBTASK 16.1 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Responsibility:GVEA/POWER Schedule and conduct a kick-off meeting to exchange pertinent information. Ensure compliance with the contract terms concerning progress payments, schedule revisions,time extensions,and change orders.Require that the Construction Contractor revise the schedule whenever external events change or irreversible slippage occurs.Require that the Construction Contractor submit a plan for implementing the revised schedule,for GVEA approval. Participate in periodic scheduling and construction conferences with GVEA and the Construction Contractor,as required. Schedule and conduct a partnering meeting with GVEA,construction contractor and POWER.Utilize guidelines and methodologies previously established by POWER and GVEA. Employ a written process of construction changes to issue prompt and fair change orders when GVEA requirements change or unanticipated site conditions develop. Implement and maintain a system of records control to insure that correspondence and important documentation is not misplaced or lost.Incorporate documentation including:progress payment verification,violation reports,change orders,material receipts,field orders,shipping documents and key photographs,etc. Promptly investigate and document all damage claims by third parties and take appropriate action.Investigate compliance and stipulation violations and implement the corrective measures identitied to prevent re-occurrence. Review field progress and inspection reports for completeness,accuracy,timely preparation,and potential problems Review the Contractor's Progress Payment requests for numerical accuracy and contirm the construction bid unit completion claimed by the Construction Contractor Prepare summary status reports using input from the Daily and Weekly field reports @LIWER) Arrange for technical support to field personnel during construction.Act as an interface between field and design.Maintain a continuous training and review program to assure that the construction inspectors are prepared for the specific conditions to be encountered. On a monthly basis,schedule and attend such meetings at GVEA's office and/or the project site as may be required,review and revise or incorporate changes GVEA may request which are consistent with the scope of work defined in this Work Plan.Forward the appropriate reports and data and a proposed meeting agenda to the GVEA sufficiently in advance to allow for adequate review by GVEA.Secure GVEA approval of the necessary reports and documents. Summarize the meeting minutes and route copies to all concerned parties for review. Provide an alternate for the construction inspector as required to ensure continuous staffing. The amount of time for contract administration is directly attributable to the construction contractor and his construction schedule.Since this is beyondPOWER's control,we expect to discuss the actual requirements closer to the time of construction.Inspection hours included in POWER's budget support the schedule submitted with this proposal.Substation construction is 80 days and RC construction is 122 days.Budgeted dollars are based on 40 hour work weeks. SUBTASK 16.2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Responsibility:POWER Provide and enforce a quality assurance program which clearly establishes the authority of those responsible for the work,and those responsible for the quality assurance program.Maintain and pursue the quality assurance program to assure control of the work. . Ensure that the Construction Contractor receipts for GVEA-furnished equipment and material prior to transfer to the Contractor's possession.Ensure that the ----eo ee ee UL7R C2OUER Contractor's material handling and storage facilities and procedures are in conformance with the specifications. Identify design,material and/or construction factors that require resolution in order to ensure uninterrupted construction.Promptly obtain answers or direction to minimize the potential for delay due to design or construction problems that develop. Document the Construction Contractor's progress on a daily and weekly basis. Prepare monthly work-complete estimates,review and verify progress payment requests,and make recommendation to GVEA relative to payment. Prepare Daily Reports.Summarize construction progress,weather,problems,and Contractor staffing levels.Ensure that the Construction Contractor's authorized representative signs each report.In the event of a disagreement,ensure that the disputed statement or statements are circled and noted by the Contractor's representative along with a statement of the Contractor's understanding of the situation or problem.The intent of this report is to either close out the day without problems or identify those items requiring resolution. Prepare Weekly Progress Reports,essentially a condensed version of the daily reports emphasizing the work completed.Ensure that the Contractor's representative signs the Weekly Report.Forward the completed and signed Weekly Progress Reports to the Contract Administrator for entry to the Construction Tracking Program. Maintain the Project Log,a chronological history of Project progress and correspondence relevant to construction,including progress reports signed by the Contractor.Incorporate other documentation including progress payment verification,violation reports,change orders,material receipts,field orders. shipping documents,key photographs,etc Observe and report on the Construction Contractor's safety program.The Contractor is responsible for development and implementation of his safety program.State and/or federal ayencies are responsible for Contractor compliance with OSHA and other governmental health and safety requirements.Provide on- CPOWER going safety training for POWER field personnel.Ensure that the Contractor prepares a complete report on all lost time accidents in the allotted time frame. Review and forward the Accident Reports to the Contract Administrator. Monitor all construction activities as required to protect environmental resources consistent with compliance and mitigation programs.Educate construction personnel in the environmental compliance requirements.As required,stake,flag, or fence all sensitive environmental resources.Promptly notify the Contract Administrator of violations and coordinate all efforts with land services. Inspect all foundation work,including excavation,placement of reinforcing steel, setting of stub angles,poles or anchor bolts,placement of concrete,backfill and compaction for conformance to the Specifications and Drawings.Complete Inspection Reports for each foundation and indicate as-built measurements,work performed and quantity variations. Observe all work involved with the construction,equipment installation,wiring, testing,and calibration of stations and their associated communication systems and work with GVEA crews to familiarize them with the stations.Identify areas that require rework. Ensure that the Construction Contractor incorporates all changes made during construction on a set of working drawings.Do not authorize release of the Contractor's retention until the completed marked-up documents are received from the Contractor. Ensure that the Contractor's representative signs the inspection reports,produced as part of the quality assurance program and verify that all deficiencies have been corrected. Perform a comprehensive final inspection.Review past inspection reports to ensure that all previously identified deficiencies have been remedied.Perform afinalinspectiontoreviewtheentireproject.Do not authorize the Construction Contractor to proceed with energization until all deficiencies have been corrected OZONE Like Contract Administration,the amount of inspection time is directly attributable to the construction contractor and his construction schedule.Since this is beyond POWER's control,we expect to discuss the actual requirements closer to the time of construction.Inspection hours included in POWER's budget support the schedule submitted with this proposal.Substation construction is 80 days and RC construction is 122 days.Budgeted dollars are based on 40 hour work weeks. POWER's budget includes per diem for one inspector at each site for the duration of substation and RC construction.Every effort will be made to utilize local inspectors and/or man camps to help reduce costs. SUBTASK 16.3 CLOSE-OUT Responsibility:POWER Review the completed project with GVEA.Manage the correction of "punch list" items to obtain GVEA's acceptance of the project. Summarize and reconcile the project payments and the final scope of work. Prepare a final payment recommendation,for GVEA consideration,based on the original contract amount,change orders,final tabulation of completed construction units,future Contractor obligations,previous Contractor payments,retention, applicable liquidated damages,lien releases,and warranties. Prepare the final close-out documents and reconcile all construction payments and the scope of the final project.Summarize the information to allow GVEA to incorporate the total.facility and component costs in GVEA's accounting system. Prepare and submit the required ayency documents closing out the construction activities. Manage the preparation of the "Record Drawings".Incorporate all field changes on the original documents.Transmit the revised documents to GVEA for GVEA's permanent records and future reference Prepare a final report summariziny the construction costs and the actual schedule of construction.Archive all contract administration and construction inspection CRIMER files and data for future reference.Prepare summaries of all major files and unresolved items.Include the following:major construction changes,contractor disputes and their resolution,serious accidents,litigation pending,easement, permit or grant violations,lien releases,and final project costs. SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLES -CM e CM Procedures e Project Log e Construction Contract ¢Violation Reports e Construction Cost Estimate «Material Receipts e Contract Recommendations e Progress Reports e Contract Documents e Inspection Reports e CM Documents e Safety Violations e CM Field Facilities «Accident Reports e Schedule Revisions e Final Inspection Report e Change Orders ¢«Record Drawings e Damage Claims e Close-Out Documents e Partnering Meeting e Construction Report e Compliance Violations e Backup Inspector Support e Progress Payments e Agency Coordination Assistance e Status Reports 2 DOWERaEOAS ll,SCHEDULE The following Project Schedule is a time-phased representation of the Project Work Plan.It was developed by POWER's proposed Project Team using the anticipated completion date,our understanding of the project requirements,and our experience with similar projects.The listed tasks are the major POWER task headings from the Task Outline,Task Sequence Diagram,and Task Descriptions that make up the Project Work Plan. The proposed Project Schedule as well as the Task Outline,Task Sequence Diagram,Task Descriptions,Budget,and Status Reports are numerically coded to facilitate reference and tracking. In the event that changes in the project scope occur,or schedule adjustments are agreed upon by GVEA and POWER personnel,schedule revisions are made quickly and easily on our CADD workstation systems.Copies of the revised schedule would then be distributed to GVEA and POWER personnel. The proposed schedule assumes that POWER would receive a Notice to Proceed from GVEA during the week of March 7,1994, The proposed Project Schedule may ditfer slightly from the GVEA Schedule which was a part of the RFP.However,the schedule was prepared with the GVEA completion dates clearly in mind =POWER is confident that the required completion and in-service dates can be met using the proposed schedule. @DQWER GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION HEALY TO FAIRBANKS 230 KV INTERTIE SUBSTATIONS AND REACTIVE COMPENSATION iO [Name waTageTu Lom [sa Tg Lem Toa Tus Toes [ome Tra Tne Doe [ng Tom TugLemLoTens Lo be Do Tw Le1PROJECTMANAGEMENTee2©Project Management MMMM 3 SUBSTATION DESIGN } 4 1 Substation Initiation ty Ss 2 Substation Equipment Specifications YUU), 6 3 Substation Layout Yh; 7 4 Substation Control &Relaying WIE 8 5 SVS and Substation Control»t Building | 9 6 Substation Review anaes 10 7 Commissioning (Optional) VW 8 Reactive Compensation Eagineenng 12 9 SVS Control Modifications: 13 PROCUREMENT \2 14 10 Procurement Initiation LY 15 11 Vendor Selection ; 16 12 Expediting and Receiving VWHQNYWOAWwr(Mau 7 CONSTRUCTION (SUBSTATION), /) 18 13.CM Initiation : 19 14 Contractor Selection 20 15 Mobilization W43 21 16 Construction Management 22 \es |)CONSTRUCTION (REACTIVE COMPENSATION} IV.BUDGET INTRODUCTION The following is a proposed budget only.It is subject to GVEA review,revision, and approval in any part and in its entirety.It is based on POWER's understanding of the scope of work as defined by GVEA and our Work Plan. BUDGETING PROCESS The proposed budget included in this section is a product of POWER's integrated PM System.Members of POWER's project team are responsible for their respective segments of the Work Plan,Schedule,and Budget,under the overall responsibility and coordination of the Project Manager. In the budgeting process,the project team uses the detailed task descriptions from the Work Plan,with the Schedule,to estimate the labor and expense requirements for each task. Labor for each subtask is estimated in man-hours for eight (8)job classifications. Expenses for each subtask are estimated in the applicable unit for ten (10)expense classifications.The man-hour and expense estimates are entered in the computer to derive labor and expense costs through the application of the current Schedule of Charges. The Project Schedule is also used as a guideline for the distribution of the manpower and expense requirements The members of the project team enter the aoe ee ee wie4 OLIWER start-week and number of weeks,for each man-hour and expense classification for their respective areas of responsibility. TRACKING /REPORTING POWER budgets and tracks the project internally at the subtask level.The man- hours and/or expenses for each subtask are accumulated to make up the task costs and are reported to GVEA at the task level.The budgets for each subtask and resultant task are POWER's best estimate of the man-hours and/or expenses necessary to accomplish the work defined in the Project Work Plan. During the course of the project,it is realistic to expect that a particular task or tasks will require more man-hours and/or expenses than budgeted,while other tasks will be accomplished with fewer man-hours and/or lower expenses than anticipated.Although an individual task may exceed the budget,POWER considers the total estimated budget for this project to be a not-to-exceed ceiling. POWER will not exceed this budget ceiling unless a written change in the Work Plan and a budget revision are approved by GVEA. To further aid POWER and GVEA in project tracking,POWER will produce monthly status reports,made available to GVEA when invoicing occurs.The report identifies labor hours,labor cost,and expenses for each subtask,totaled to the task level.Moreover,the report displays the original budget compared to actual amounts for the current month and for the project to date.Remaining budgeted amounts and percent complete are also displayed.If requested by GVEA,a different format,level of detail,or reporting frequency may be accommodated in these reports.However,additional requirements beyond our standard status reporting procedures would be an additional charge to GVEA. INVOICING BASIS GVEA will be invoiced only for the labor and expenses incurred by POWER to accomplish the specific tasks identitied POWER's proposed Project Budget is based on monthly progress payments For work on continuing projects that CDIWER) exceed one year,the budget will be revised at the beginning of each year to reflect the revised Schedule of Charges effective January 1 of each year. Invoices will be submitted each calendar month for the work accomplished during that period,and will be due and payable when issued.All accounts not paid within thirty (30)days from the invoice date will bear a service charge of one percent (1%)per month for each month the invoice is unpaid. POWER's invoice format separates labor and expense costs.Labor charges are itemized to include the following information:employee name,hours,billing rate, and amount.Reimbursable expenses include expense description and amount. If requested by GVEA,additional administrative support work such as a different invoicing format,copies of POWER employee expense reports,or additional information can be accommodated at additional cost.POWER also offers its invoicing records to GVEA for review/audit purposes in POWER's offices during normal business hours. No premium is charged for overtime work.Personnel with specialized experience are employed or retained by POWER.Charges for these specialists have been incorporated in the proposed Project Budget on an individual basis depending on the assignment.)Professional time for depositions and testimony is charged at one and one-half(1 1/2)times the rate for services,full-day minimums apply. POWER's proposed Project Budget is based on reimbursement by GVEA of all - expenses and/or services such as subcontractors,test equipment,photography, transportation,vehicles,shipping,computer services,lodging,meals,reproduction, long-distance telephone,telecopier.express mail,courier/delivery service,special equipment,and supplies not normally provided at cost plus ten percent (+10%). @LQMERBO120183GVEA(2/18/94)4 IV-3 General Engineering Cost Breakdown by Design Task and Links Project:Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substation and Reactive Compensation Task #Link # 1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Fbks 360 MH $25,020 Igloo 240 MH $16,680 2.0 DATA REVIEW Fbks 65 MH $5,295 Igloo 43 MH $3,517 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA Fbks 588 MH $34,548 Igloo 395 MH $23,282 4.0 DESIGN MANUAL Fbks 457 MH $26,589 Igloo 307 MH $17,941 5.0 SOIL INVESTIGATION Fbks 152 MH $11,456 « igloo 100 MH $7,548 6.0 SURVEY /ACCESS Fbks 13 MH $1,209 Igloo 9 MH $837 7.0 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS /DETAILS Fbks 824 MH $48,645 igloo 547 MH $32,286 8.0 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS /LIST Fbks 337 MH $20,608 Igloo 225 MH $13,788 9.0 BID DOCUMENTS Fbks 249 MH $15,913 igloo 171 MH $10,887 10.0 BID EVALUATION Fbks 12 MH $665 Igloo 8 MH $539 11.0 ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION Fbks 169 MH $12,487 Igloo 114 MH $8,422 12.0 RECORD DRAWINGS /CLOSEOUT Fbks 94 MH $5,582 igloo .63 MH $3,739 13.0 REACTIVE COMPENSATION Fbks °253 MH $17,727 Igloo 169 MH $11,831 General Engineering Cost Breakdown by Design Talk and Links Project:Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substation and Reactive Compensation Task #Link # 14.0 EXISTING STATIC VAR SYSTEM CONTROLS Gold Hill 140 MH $10,140 Healy 140 MH $10,140 Teeland 0 MH $0 15.0 PROJECT /CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Fbks 257 MH $14,895 Igloo 257 MH $14,895 16.0 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Fbks 1,658 MH $96,978 Igloo 1,658 MH $96,978 0.0 EXPENSES -DESIGN Fbks 44,233 $44,233 Igloo 29,488 $29,488 0.0 EXPENSES -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Fbks 39,350 $39,350 Igloo 39,350 $39,350 TOTAL LABOR AND EXPENSES I $773,488 || CONTINGENCY 10.00%$77,349 GRAND TOTAL NTE.====>|$850,837 || Note:Subcontractor labor is shown as expenses. Project:Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substation and Reactive Compensation Man-Hour Breakdown per Resource /Task [Unit $$93 $83 $46-73 $46 $39 $63 $54 TOTAL Project Project Engineer AutoCAD Clerical CM Inspector COSTS Manager -Engineer Staff PROJECT ADMINISTRATION |ft -| Fbks 180 |180 oo $25,020 Igloo 120 |120]816,680| DATA REVIEW i-:- __Fbks 36,24)5,_iL.$5,295 | Igloo 24 16 3 $3,517 DESIGN CRITERIA __ Fbks 78 278!196!36)r $34,548|igloo 54 -|186}131 24 a $23,282 DESIGN MANUAL fT . Fbks 48 -|_.235)164]10 |$26,589|Igloo 34\..157 110 6 $17,941 SOILS INVESTIGATION ieee 2 Fbks 24 5 118 5 $11,456 Igloo 16 3 78 _ee $7,548|SURVEY /ACCESS i Fbks 13 -OL ;$1,209 Igloo 9 Le .$837 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS /DETAILS | Fbks 53 49;408!257,7 j ||.__$48,645 Igtoo 36 32;269.172;38,_iL 32,286] MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS /LIST I i Fbks 30|251!14]42)f $20,608| Igloo 21 166!10:28).ot $13,788| BID DOCUMENTS F r 7 Fbks 38 176.35 $15,913 igloo 26,1201 TT 38st TL 310.887 BID EVALUATION |eo Fbks |ny 10.2p 665|Igloo -dt...§,2)fo a $539 ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION Fbks 36 133_ee oo f $12,487 Igloo 24 90!TT $8,422| RECORD DRAWINGS /CLOSEOUT _) Fbks 5 59!301 |$5,582| Igloo 3 40:20 i $3,739 REACTIVE COMPENSATION ; Fbks 6 -60 144 -CX)ee $17,727 Igloo 4 _40,96.290 $11,837 Project:Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Substation and Reactive Compensation Man-Hour Breakdown per Resource /Task Unit $$93 $83 $46-73 $46 $39 $63 $54 TOTAL Project Project Engineer AutoCAD Clerical CM Inspector COSTS Manager _Engineer Staff EXITING STATIC VAR SYSTEM CONTROLS oo Gold Hill 20 20 _80 _20 _$10,140Healy20208020 __$10,140| Teeland 0)of si,ji.oO |_i $0| PROJECT /CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT _be ee Fos 7.sd 196!|59 I $14,895 Igloo 2t 196!'59]eee | $14,895 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION =|,|fe ft.oF Fbks 7 14 4 820|820 $96,978 Igloo 14)4 820 820 $96,978 SUM 962 229 3,940 1,104 559 1,640 1,640 Total MH =>|10,074]$621,067 Page t HEALY -FAIRBANKS 230 KV INTERTIE PROJECT POWER ENGINEERS INC. SCHEDULE OF CHARGES -1994 This standard Schedule of Charges is for professional services.Unless agreed otherwise,charges for work on continuing projects will be based on the then current Schedule of Charges.A new Schedule of Charges will be issued to be effective January 1 of each new year and as necessary on an intermediate basis to accommodate new dems or revised charges.Invoices will be submitted monthly and/or upon completion of the work and will be due and payable when issued.All accounts not paid within thirty (30)days from the invoice date will beara SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5%PER MONTH for each month the invoice is unpaid. PE NNE Project Managel...........ccccc:cscssscsecsscssessacsceccsescsscceesseccessecsscscescogesessseseonesssescoseceecenessguccossssssaeentiseseeerenses $93.00/nr. Senior Consultant Project Engimee'.............ccccsccsrsscsccvsrerssscsscccasersseceestaccssucocsscscesssscesesssaceersessacseascecsessssacecensssseserausacsonsonses $83.00/nr. Consultant Senior Project Administrator Supervisory R-O-W Agent EMGiNe@e|r II ...........ssccccccoccccssrsnonsasccouasescacconasseconscsesestenscccsescassasessoecnsaeaescnsecoacnccssecscssseccesansestcsaaanonsaeaceeses $73.00/hr. Designer IV Engineering Technician IV Environmental Speciaiist lll Senior R-O-W Agent ENGiN@e|F Il..........20.cs-sevccoscoscccrsensocccvcosensesesseccasoostseesstucecsssssaseaceaseusesscessenssspesnoncseenssssesonssesnssseascessesooessorss $63.00/nr. Designer III Engineering Technician Ill Environmental Specialist !I Purchasing Agent Senior Administrator R-O-W Agent ENginees I......0...ccssscesccscccovsvvovavonesoovoecasoveaccoseostasccestscoessasesensceeseaseseneesoarasspnacasccsssosnsssacosnessvsuconecasoceesesess $54.00/Mr. Designer It Engineering Technician Il Environmental Specialist | Administrator Field Representative IV Senior Purchasing Specialist De@SIGnel 1..........ccccrsccscesesvcsecscsacssosscoeseaccoenesocsenatreessessesetesrasensssesersnsesesepenssenonsscessessessacscersstsesoeeaacoorenenese $46 OO/nr Engineering Technician | Administrative Assistant Field Representative Ill Purchasing Specialist Drafter .o...........ccc.ccssscssocoesosseecescevesessocuerssesssesenetscececo.co secsevavsvevevevecdseccesrssestssenstiuseeseuenseusrecuueaserseeecesess $39 O0/hr Staff Assistant Field Representative Il TY PiSteecccccccccccccessscscesscsossssssssessesmecsnecenseesecsseeseescecscsitss cesresveveanesveavesssiessesteneesscssestestiesecesssssteisieeseaeess $29 OOM Data Entry Operator Field Representative | Utility No premium is charged for overtime work.Personnel with specialized expenence are employed by or on retainer to POWER Chases °°* specifications are negotiated on an individual basis depending on the assignment.Professional time for depositions and testimony is cra ye ° times the rate for services;full-day minimums apply. GMI3SA (10/18/93) Page 2 HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230 KV INTERTIE PROJECT POWER ENGINEERS,INC. SCHEDULE OF CHARGES -1994 This standard Schedule of Charges is for the current year.Unless agreed otherwise,charges for work on continuing projects will be based on the then current Schedule of Charges.A new Schedule of Charges will be issued to be effective January 1 of each new year and as necessary on an intermediate basis to accommodate new items or revised charges.Invoices will be submitted monthly and/or upon completion of the work and will be due and payable when issued.Alt accounts not paid within thirty (30)days after Owner's receipt of the invoice will beara SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5%PER MONTH for each month the invoice is unpaid. COMPUTER VICE GIS Workstation ..includes software Engineering Workstation ..includes specialized software* Personal Computer ..includes standard software charges for special software will be added,see "Special Application Software Fee Rates”. Drafting Station wisoftware ..{May include Procad,Autocad, Intergraph P PP Structure Spotting/Optimization™* Electrocon Software w/Computer** Level |Software*** Level Il Software**** SURVEY SUPPLIES Plastic Aerial Panels Wood Stakes 4 Lath Flagging #5 x 20"Rebar Rebar Caps Marking Paint Fieid Books GPS Equipment SURVEY EQUIPMENT Survey Equip.to support field crew TRANSPORTATION Cessna 210 (Wet.with Pitot) Pilot Standby Navajo Commander 840 $35.00/hr. $35.00/Mr. $10.00/nr. $12.00/Mr. $60.00/Mr. $60.00/Mr. $10.00/mr. $20.00/Mmr. $3.50/ea. $8.50/od. $12.50/bd. $1.50/ea. $.50/ea. $.30/ea. $4.00/ea. $5.00/ea. $1200.00/day $125.00/day $205.00/nr $30.00/r. $400.00/hr. $590.00/nr PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDING Portable Video Camera $35 00/day Video Tapes $8 00/ea RE ie)! Blueline (C Size)$1.00/ea Electrostatic (C Size)$1.$0/ea Blueline (D Size)$1.50/ea. Electrostatic (D Size)$3.00/ea. Blueline (E Size)$2.50/ea. Electrostatic (E Size)$5 00/ea. Mylar (C Size)$4.00/ea. Mylar (D Size)$6.00/ea. Mylar (E Size)$10 00/ea. Velium (C Size)$2.00/ea. Vellum (D Size)$4 00/ea. Vellum (E Size)$6 O0/ea. CAMERA WORK 9”x 12°PMT $10.00/ea. 12°x 18°PMT $13.00/ea. 18"x 24"PMT $15.00/ea. 20°x 24°PMT $15.00/ea. 12°x 18°Mylar $13.00/ea. 18"x 24"Mylar $16.S0/ea. 20°x 24"Mylar $16.50/ea. 12°x 18°Clear $13.00/ea. 18°x 24°Clear $16 S0/ea. 20°x 24°Clear $16 50/ea. DOCUMENTS Copies $10/ea Spiral Comb $3 Od/ea 3 Ring Binder $7 O0/ea SHIPPING Box or Tube $1 50/ea Other expenses such as subcontractors,rental equipment,photog:acry *arsponation,rental vehicles,shipping,outside computer services.!0cg "g meals,other reproduction,lang distance telephone,telecopier erc:ess "ail couner/delivery service,special supplies,are charged at cost clus 4 carrying and handling charge of 10%. *Specialized software included in the UNIX Engineering Workstation fee are the following Intergraph packages.MICAPLUS,MODELVIEW INROADS EESCHEMATIC,INSITE,IRASC,EEWPD,INFLOW,INFORMIX P#O.6CT ARCHITECT,PLANT DESIGN SYSTEMS **Structure Spotting/Optimization and Electrocon will normally be ©:ees .-4 specihc project basis. ***Includes,among others CPM,Traverse PC,Structural Design Fouxcatwon Design HVAC Design,and Conveyor Design ****Includes,among others Distribution Power System Analysis @¢:-g Design Cost of Service/Rate Review,Transmission System Analyss +- specialized estimating programs. GM135A (1/14/93) V.PROJECT TEAM KEY PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS For the Healy-Fairbanks 230kV Intertie Substations and Reactive Compensation Project,POWER proposes a team with expertise,demonstrated experience,and the proven ability to work together.Following are the key team members proposed: e Randy Pollock,P.E.,Project Principal e Stan Sostrom,Project Manager e Tim Ostermeier,P.E.,Engineering Manager e Don Angell,P.E.,SVS and Protective Relaying Project Engineer e Larry Hinton,P.E.,Geotechnical/Site Design e Larry Hinzman,Ph.D.,Arctic Soils Specialist e Roger Clayton,P.E.,SVS Studies Engineer ¢Bill Gundy,P.E.,Seismic Specialist To complement these key individuals,the team includes electrical,civil,mechanical and architectural engineers and technicians from our Idaho office.In addition,we can draw upon our multidisciplinary staff of more than 400 people to provide specialized engineering work and support when needed.If changes of scope or unanticipated project developments occur,POWER can redirect in-house resources to get the job done quickly,effectively,and economically. The proposed team members are available to begin work on the project when POWER receives Notice to Proceed CRIMES THE POWER TEAM'S EXPERTISE POWER's proposed team is capable of providing all of the services required for successful completion of the project.Areas of particular interest include: e Geotechnical Engineering (Arctic Experience) e SVS and Applied Technologies e«Cold Weather Experience e Mechanical,Electrical and Seismic Engineering The following capsules and the resumes at the end of this section detail the experience and qualifications of our carefully selected team members. PROFILES OF KEY PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Stan Sostrom,an Alaska resident with more than 14 years of experience in electrical system project management,engineering and design,will be responsible for the overall direction of the project.As Project Manager,he will be personally responsible for ensuring that the project is completed on time and within established budgetary constraints.As a POWER project manager and head of our Alaska office,Stan has gained valuable experience in coordinating POWER teams on various Alaska projects.His recent project assignments include serving as Chief Electrical Engineer responsible for electrical construction inspection for the 345-230kV Pinnacle Peak Substation in Anzona;Project Engineer responsible for the complete design of the 230-12kV DuPont Substation in Washington;as well as the DuPont Substation.Project Engineer for four(4)500kV Series Capaciter installations in California. Stan's understanding of the special requirements of electric power systems in an arctic environment will be extremely valuable in directing an efficient design and construction effort. To demonstrate corporate commitment to this project,POWER proposes Randy Pollock,P.E.,Senior Vice President,as Project Principal.Randy,an Alaska- registered electrical engineer,will provide project oversight and periodic OPOWER) involvement to ensure that the project remains on track.Randy has over 20 years of experience in the electrical utility business.Most recently he has had Project Principal responsibilities for the Komorany Project,an upgrade of an existing heating plant in the Czech Republic.The plant's thermal output will be 1057MWth after the upgrade and includes 200MWe of cogeneration which is sold to the grid. He was responsible for project management and contractual aspects of the project, and general project oversight.He has also been Project Manager for numerous substation and transmission projects,including The Lytton Springs-Trading Post 345kV Transmission Line Project,City of Lodi 230kV Direct Interconnection Project,the City of Lodi Industrial Substation,the 230kV Geothermal Public Power Line Project,and the Western States Intertie SOOkV Project. Tim Ostermeier,P.E.,is proposed as Engineering Manager for the project. Working out of our Idaho office,he will be responsible for day-to-day project design and the allocation of resources in coordination with Stan.Tim brings to the project more than 14 years of utility engineering experience,including an impressive list of substation projects.As a POWER Project Manager,Project Engineer and Substation Group Lead,he has gained valuable experience directing project teams on substation projects ranging from 5kV through 5OOkV.Recent experience includes acting as Project Manager for the EPRI/BPA SOOkV Thyrisor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC)Project,and Project Manager for the Los Angeles Dept.of Water and Power Mead-Adelanto Project SVSs.Cold weather experience includes being Project Engineer for projects in northern Vermont, Montana and Wyoming that required performance parameters of minus 60°F and 2"radial ice.Tim's Alaska registration is pending. The proposed SVS and Protective Relaying Project Engineer,Don Angell,P.E.,is recognized in Alaska utility circles as an industry leader in electrical systems studies.He will oversee the reactive compensation and protective relaying design portions of this project.An Alaska-registered electrical engineer,Don has performed a full spectrum of studies and analyses for an impressive list of Alaska clients,including Chugach Electric Association,MAPCO Petroleum,Alaska Energy Authority,Kodiak Electnc Association,Copper Valley Electric Association,and Alyeska Pipeline Service Company.Recent projects Don has completed in Alaska include:design of a communication system for Chugach Electric Association that integrates the transfer tripping scheme with an existing CLQMER Na rs ne ee ee en LT ie) microwave system,system studies and conceptual system designs for Railbelt Utilities for a proposed new transmission line intertie between Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula;and a feasibility study for the Northeast Transmission Intertie for Alaska Energy Authority that involved modeling the SVS as part of a stability analysis. Larry Hinton,P.E.,will direct the geotechnical and site design effort.He will be responsible for overseeing the geotechnical effort and coordinating the site/civil design.Larry is a registered civil engineer in the state of Alaska.He was lead geotechnical/foundation engineer for the University and Dave's Creek substations for Chugach Electric Association,and geotechnical and hydro engineer for a surface water management dike system for Usibelli Coal Mine in Healy,Alaska. EXPERT SUBCONSULTANTS POWER proposes to augment our considerable in-house expertise with the specialized services of several highly qualified subconsultants.With our background and additional support from these experts,we can give GVEA the best possible engineering product. For local expertise in arctic soils,POWER proposes Dr.Larry Hinzman as a member of the geotechnical/site design team.Larry is considered one of the world's experts in arctic soils.He will provide geotechnical specifications and specify the types and quantities of samples required.He will also provide the analysis of the soil borings data and make foundation recommendations accordingly.Larry has recently completed projects for NASA,EPA,USGS,the National Science Foundation,Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, the State of Alaska DOT,the U S Forest Service,British Petroleum and ARCO. We have selected Electrical Power Consultants (EPC)to provide specialized expertise in supporting,as needed,the etfort to procure the required reactive compensation.EPC provides consulting services and application software for the electric utility and industrial power sectors.They specialize in the analytical, computational and engineering study requirements for the generation,transmisson, distribution and utilization of electrical power.Specific software has been CLIWER developed to handle a broad range of power system study requirements,with capabilities for running the largest power system engineering programs.They bring to the project extensive experience in performing system studies involving AC/DC options,system load flow/stability performance,system compensation, reliability,and economic comparisons. Bill Gundy,P.E.,joins the team as a seismic specialist to perform seismic analysis and review and to provide specific input into the design criteria for the building that will house the RC and the RC components.Bill brings to the project 25 years of experience in all aspects of seismic qualification of transmission and distribution equipment.His expertise and his many years in the utility industry have earned him national recognition as a leading authority on seismic design requirements. ORGANIZATION CHART AND RESUMES An organization chart that shows lines of authority and responsibility for the proposed project team is provided on the following page.Resumes for key project team members as well as support statf are included after the organization chart. POWER GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Healy -Fairbanks 230kV Intertie Uy QUER;.NGINEERSSubstations&Reactive Compensation GOLDEN VALLEY (neeeeeenee ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION KEY PERSONNEL i MANAGER OF ENG,SERVICES February 18,1994iLSteveHaagenson | PROJECT PRINCIPAL POWER ENGINEERS,INC.CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR Randy Pollock,P E 7 PROJECT MANAGER Jim Cucullu Stan Sosuom ;S !| (ENGINEERING MANAGER -fim Ostermerer Pe NX SUBSTATION PROJECT PROJECT STRUCTURAL PROJECT MECHANICAL PROJECT ARCHITECT ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER Jay Keeling PE Phil Stenberg,PE Shawn Crea,PE Steve Deal.ALA &Suppor Staff &Suppon Staff &Suppon Staff &Suppon Staff CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Eugene Wiltgen,PE James "Bo”Hayes REACTIVE COMPENSATION DESIGN PROJECT ENGINEER GEOTECHNICAL SITE DESIGN Lary Hinton,PE Don Angell,P E &Support Staff SVS STUDIES [-ARCTIC SPECIALIST Electrical Power Consultants Larry Hinzman,Ph D Roger Clayton SEISMIC SPECIALIST Bill Gundy,PE [-SITE DESIGN Chip Carlson,PL S. --DRILLING CONTRACTOR Clarke Engineering "-SURVEY CONTRACTOR Design Alaska GO 1-20-183 RANDALL POLLOCK,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: EXPERIENCE: PROJECT PRINCIPAL B.S.,Electrical Engineering,California State Polytechnic University,1972 Alaska (EE 6551),Arizona,California,Colorado,Idaho,Montana,Nevada,New Mexico, Oregon,Texas,Utah,Vermont,Virginia,Washington,Wyoming Mr.Pollock has been the project principal manager or engineer on a variety of POWER projects.He has extensive experience in all phases of transmission line and substation projects for utility customers and is especially well qualified in the areas of system planning, cost estimating and economic analysis,preliminary and final design,material procurement and overall project coordination. Prior to joining POWER Engineers,Mr.Pollock acquired 10 years of valuable experience as an Area Engineer for Pacific Power and Light Company.Specific duties included planning and design of power systems,power system analysis and trouble shooting,protective relaying,fault current and voltage profile studies,equipment specification,and materials testing and evaluation.Additional responsibilities during this period included conducting electric service negotiations and the development of written specifications and test procedures for the installation of various electrical components.Some of Mr.Pollock's specific project experience includes: O Northeast Transmission Intertie Feasibility Study,Alaska _Technical Advisor for a study to provide feasibility-level design,cost estimates and associated engineering,route selection,and permitting studies for the line sections as well as stations making up the proposed interties.The intertie would parallel the existing intertie between the Anchorage and Fairbanks area utilities.The first phase involves analyzing the transmission system and performing a reconnaissance study to determine an alternative and a preferred route.The second phase includes the transmission system design.This complex study project was completed on a fast-track basis. O City of Lodi 230-60kV Substation,California Project Manager for this 230-60kV,300 MVA substation.The station design features a four-breaker ring bus.2*0kV breakers,230-60kV autotransformers and 60kV double- circuit line loops through this stauon,connecting a Western Area Power Administration (Western)line to the City of Lodi.The 230kV side of the substation is designed to Western specifications and has room for expansion and conversion to breaker-and-a-half bus configuration.Mr Pollock also managed the land,environmental,and transmission line design activities for this project. O Citizens Utilities Company-Vermont Highqate-Boise Cascade 69/46kV Project,Northern Vermont As Project Manager.Mr Pollock had overall responsibilities to upgrade CUC's 69/46KV facilities located near the Highgate area in Northern Vermont.The primary objective of the upgrade was to provide greater reliability and increased capacity to the area Theupgradeconsistedofreplacingfivemilesofsingle-circuit 69/46kV transmission line with a double-circuit 6 4GkV transmission line and constructing a new substation CLIMER RANDY POLLOCK 2 adjacent to the existing VELCO highgate Substation.The substation consisted of a 69/46kV,six breaker ring bus,with a future 115/46kV transformer position.The ring bus employed a compact design to accommodate space restrictions at the site.Line design required a special steel pole structure and foundation to accommodate a bay crossing as well as withstand submersion in 25 feet of water. QO Grayrocks Dam Hydroelectric Power Retrofit,Wyoming Project Engineer for the feasibility study and preliminary engineering design to add a powerhouse to generate hydroelectricity at the Grayrocks Dam.Conducted an analysis of various types of turbines for use on the project including tubular,crossflow,and vertical.Analyzed existing communications network and recommended required additional equipment to augment the existing VHF communications and SCADA equipment for control of the new turbine generator.Specified all switchgear and interface metering and equipment to interconnect with the Wheatland REA system. Control of the operation of the hydroelectric generator and system interface would be utilizing the VHF SCADA link interconnected with a Bailey Net 90 distributed control system,tied into the Laramie River Station control room.The Laramie River Station consists of 3 500 MW coal fired units near Wheatland,Wyoming. 0 Kenncott-UCD Bingham Canyon Mine Modernization Project,Utah Project Manager of this $17.6 million electrical modernization project to upgrade the power supply and pit electrics of the world's largest open-pit copper mine.Project involved a major new six-breaker ring bus switching station,new in-pit distribution,|- 75KVA and 27 -2500KVA substations,and 12 miles of double-and single-circuit steel and wood transmission line to serve conveying,crushing,and power shovel loads.The project also involved a study and design review to determine the feasibility of upgrading a primary feed line from 44kV to 138kV,and the necessity of replacing lattice steel structures in order to install 79Skcmil ACSR conductor.Responsible for feasibility studies,cost estimates,final design,material specifications and procurement,and construction management associated with the new electrical facilities.Exercised fiscal control in the purchase of transmission and substation equipment as owner's agent Project was completed on schedule and within budget. O Lytton Springs-Trading Post 345kV Transmission Line,Austin,Texas Mr.Pollock.served as Proyect Manager for permitting and detailed design for a new $15 million,3i-mile 345kV transmission line serving the southwest portion of Austn, Texas.The line was designed as a double circuit,steel-pole transmission line with two 1780 kcmil "Chukar”conductors per phase.Foundations were concrete pier,although direct embedment stricture were also considered.Special environmental permits were required to meet the City's Comprehensive Watershed Ordinance and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan.Because of the area's geology,special grouted anchor footings had to be desizned for some of the structures.The City also required that this EHV line be designed so that the electrical field would be 2kV per meter or less anywhere on the right-of-way These design features were all satisfactorily met within very tight schedule constraints PZIMER "th RANDY POLLOCK O Western State Intertie S00kV Transmission Line;Idaho,Oreqon,Utah,and Nevada Mr.Pollock served as a Project Manager for the transmission system portion of the Western States Intertie,a 500kV transmission line project,proposed by J.R.Simplot, that would have connected southern [daho to a terminus point in the southwest.Mr. Pollock's responsibilities included defining project criteria;project size,geographical locations,and alternative interconnect points.The two primary system alternatives considered included two single-circuit 500kV AC lines with 2-2312 kcmil conductors per phase and a single +500kV DC fine with 3-2312 kcmil conductors per pole Detailed construction cost estimates and economic analyses were completed for the proposed project.Preliminary design for the transmission line facilities and interconnecting 500kV substations were prepared.Mr.Pollock was also responsible for the collection of engineering data from utilities and for engineering support in agency scoping meetings with the U.S.Forest Service,BLM,and other affected agencies.Mr. Pollock and his staff met with 24 of the major western utilities to discuss the project. Other responsibilities included project scheduling,electrical systems studies,routing and siting,night of way acquisition,and preliminary design. City of Lodi Direct Interconnection Project,California The Direct Interconnection Project would provide for an interconnection of the City of Lodi,California with the Western Area Power Administration's 230kV_line. approximately five miles west of Lodi.As Project Manager,Mr.Pollock was responsible for preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR),public hearings. and preliminary design.The draft E{R was prepared in-house by POWER Engineers. Technically,the project consisted of two substations and six miles of 230kV,double- circuit,steel-pole transmission line.Single-circuit steel and wood-pole transmission lines,with and without underbuild,were considered as alternatives.One of the substations consisted of a 230kV,four-breaker ring bus scheme,convertible to a breaker- and-a-half,at the interconnection point.The other substation consisted of a 300 MVA 230/60kV,dual transformer bay,substation with a six-terminal 60kV ring bus on the low side.The project would provide the primary source of power for Lodi's electrical load.Contract issues are being handled by the City of Lodi,and the Project 1s presently on an indefinite hold pending the outcome of contract issues. OLOWER STANLEY SOSTROM 2 minimize down time when the station 1s converted to 230kV.An automatic line switching scheme was implemented which will isolate transmission faults and automatically restore service to the station.The station is designed for a future second transformer and distribution bay,and utilizes underground cables for distribution circuits. OO Idaho Power Company,230kV Substations Mr.Sostrom is a Substation Engineer involved with a series of design modifications to a number of 230kV stations.Design modifications include circuit breaker bay additions, transformer changeouts,SCADA RTU installations,Sequence of Events Recorder installations,and various other modifications. OO Pinnacle Peak Substation,Arizona Chief Electrical Engineer responsible for electrical construction inspection for this 345- 230kV substation,which included 345kV series capacitors.Due to a compressed schedule,electrical control drawings were reviewed and corrected in the field.Replaced existing control and relaying panels,while maintaining substation service;no unplanned outages were experienced. O Copper Valley Electric Association,Alaska Project Manager for a feasibility study for a 138kV transmission line from Sutton to Glennallen.The purpose of the study is to investigate the possibility of obtaining long- term economical power as an alternative to diesel generation.It is anticipated that the transmission line would allow the owner to lower rates and improve stability.Cost estimates for various configuration and construction methods were developed and evaluated.Several route alternatives were developed and analyzed to address environmental and public impact concerns. OC Iwilei Substation,Hawai Project Engineer responsible for the conceptual design of the expansion and replacement of an existing 138-25kV and 46-12kV substation.The station is located in a congested industrial area in Honolulu and required innovative design techniques to provide the required facilities in limuted space.Four alternatives for the all indoor substation were prepared.Two alternatives utilized conventional switchgear and constniction techniques. The other two alternatives required innovative designs including extensive use of Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS)in a multi-story control building to allow room to construct a multi-story office building on 4 portion of the site.Design had to permut staged construction to allow new tailites to be constructed and energized pnor to removing existing equipment.All circusts to and from the station are through 138kV,46kV. 25kV,and 12kV underground Vable O Homer Electric Association,Long Range Plan Project Manager for a Long Range Plan that addressed the operating considerations and facility required to sere members for the next 20 years or more.Also assessed was the remaining usable life of the 4 tiles of submarine cable that crosses Kachemak Bay The cable was modeled on a vomputer and its effects on the distribution system analysed CLIWER STANLEY SOSTROM POSITION: EDUCATION: EXPERIENCE: PROJECT MANAGER/SUBSTATION ENGINEER BS,Electrical Engineering,1978,South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Mr.Sostrom heads POWER's Alaska office with responsibilities as a Project Manager.He has more than 14 years of experience in POWER system project management,engineering, and design.His experience covers a broad background including studies,distribution design, substation design,control and relay design,and system maintenance.He is well-versed in SCADA design,installation management,and relay coordination.{n addition,Mr.Sostrom has experience with the preparation of operation manuals,maintenance procedures,dispatch procedures,and outage procedures. Prior to joining POWER,Mr.Sostrom worked for three years with Fricon Engineering in Cheyenne,Wyoming.During that time,he was involved in substation and power distnbution systems;substation relay and control systems;field engineering;and substation construction inspection.In addition,Mr.Sostrom worked for seven years with the City of Longmont, Colorado,where he was involved with substation design and construction management of 115/12.47kV substations.He was responsible for the complete testing,checkout,and troubleshooting of transformers,circuit breakers,and relay/control systems.Some of Mr. Sostrom's project experience follows. Oo Glen Canyon Switchyard,Arizona Test Engineer for this substation upgrade project.Responsibilities included complete testing of new equipment and control systems for this 345-230kV substation.Replaced existing relaying and control panels.Also replaced 60%of existing equipment. Completely tested all new equipment,including transformers,circuit breakers, instrument transformers,cable,and control panels. Fordham 115-12.5kV Distribution Substation,Colorado Electrical Design Engineer responsible for complete design of new 115-12.5kV substation.Features included two 40 MVA transformers with automatic throw-over on the 12.5kV bus,metal-clad switchgear and all underground feeders.The facility featured an 18 breaker line-up and underground feeders to an indoor facility. Harvard Street Substation Addition,Colorado Design Engineer responsible tor design and construction of this 115-12.5kV substation addition.The addition doubled the capacity of the existing station.Design necessitated interface with existing equipment and controls.Design included automatic throw-wver capabilities between new and existing equipment.Design incorporated outdoor civcuul breakers,with underground teeders.A unique bypass/disconnect switch arrangement was used to maintain a low profile design. Bellis Substation,Washington Project Engineer responsible tor the complete design of this 230-12kV substation Xn innovative design was required to avoid impactingthe extensive wetlands on the «1. The station was designed and insulated for 230kV,but will be initially operaicd HiSkV.A primary consideration in the design was ease of equipment replace ni % CLIWER STANLEY SOSTROM 3 Compensation to limit overvoltage problems on the unloaded cable was addressed. Various alternatives for replacement were assessed and installation costs were developed. Mr.Sostrom prepared and delivered a presentation for the Board of Directors outlining the completed study which included the evaluation of three load levels and the effects of various growth senarios on the utility.The cesults of this study will be used to determine needed capital projects and the effect on rates and utility operation. QO DuPont Substation,Washington Project Engineer responsible for the complete design of this 230-12kV substation.The station was designed and insulated for 230kV,but will be initially operated at LISkV.A primary consideration in the design was ease of equipment replacement to minimize down time when the station is converted to 230kV.An automatic line switching scheme was implemented which will isolate faults on the transmission line and automatically restore service to the station.An innovative grounding system design was required due to the poor soil conditions at the site,which was primarily gravel.The station is designed for a future second transformer and distnbution bay,and utilizes underground cable for distribution circuits. O 500kV Series Capacitor Banks,California Project Engineer responsible for complete platform design for four SOOkV series capacitor installations tor the California-Oregon Transmission Project (COTP).Each platform contained two separate capacitor banks,each requiring their own set of controls and protective devices.Mr.Sustrom prepared platform equipment layout drawings,bus layout and connection drawings,bus bar fabrication drawings,and fiber optic and control Wire interconnection drawings. G Collierville Substation,California Project Engineer for the 230kVY switchyard expansion at the Collierville Hydroelectne Project.Responsible tor the complete physical and electrical design as well as testing and energization services The control and relay design was complicated by inaccurate drawings of the existing system =The existing drawings are also in a difficult to read European format. O Bonneville Power Administration,SCADA and SEMR Projects Project Engineer responsinie tor the Complete design for SCADA and SEMR installations at twelve existing SOCkKS and D4ckV substations.These installations replaced a wide range of existing outdates!s.'cerns The design required interfacing with many ditterent styles and vintages of >tation cquipment and protective schemes.Many of (hese projects were completed «9 4 9-0 track basis. O Bonneville Power Administration,Substation Design Manual Project Engineer for the Jessen of a Substation Design Manual,which BPA will use te train consultants and new esieaces The manual includes an overview of past desien philosophies and drawing.c.'es as well as examples of current standards.Cheskhi ts were prepared for cach top dono ws substation or substation modifications project te te ip assure complete designs 29 DOWER)nee es TIMOTHY OSTERMEIER,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: EXPERIENCE: ENGINEERING MANAGER B.S.E.E.(Power Option),South Dakota State University,1979 Master of Engineer Management,University of Colorado Oregon,Utah,Colorado,Kansas,California,Minnesota,South Dakota,Alaska* Mr.Ostermeier has more than 14 years of utility experience as an electrical engineer For the past four years he has been Project Manager or Project Engineer on substation projects ranging from 5kV through 500kV for POWER.Previously he worked nine years for a large A/E firm.He has attended numerous seminars and courses relating to power systems and protective relaying. Mr.Ostermeier's recent project experience includes the following: O Static VAR System,Los Angeles Department of Water and Power/Siemens Eneray and Automation Mead-Adelanto Project. Engineering Manager for two 388 Mvar SVSs,one at Marketplace Substation and one at Adelanto Switching Station.These state-of-the-art SVSs feature digital control systems, extensive HVAC requirements,large cooling systems and high security and availability guarantees,Seismic criteria is of particular attention as the project sites are located in active seismic zones.Other special features require extensive fiber optic cabling.CCTV systems and fire suppression for the control room (halon substitute)and water deluge for the 500-16kV power transformers. O 500kV Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC)Bank,EPRI,GE and BPA ten Project Manager for this fast-track demonstration of project technology to support the EPRI Flexible AC Transmission (FACTS)program.Duties included directing design of the SOOKV line re-termination,yard extension,SOUkKV platforms,platform bussing and arrangement,fiber optic communications links,and associated grading and concrete foundations.Additional design requirements included cooling piping,pump skid connections,heat exchangers,piping insulation,cooling containment and associated supporting facilities consisting ofa 70°x 36'control building with auxiliary AC.DC and UPS systems.Other responsibilities included contractor selection,pruicst administration.construction management,and field checkout support. O 500kV Series Capacitor Banks and Stations,Bonneville Power Administration Project Manager responsible for design of an installation of eight SOOKV series Lapis banks installation ultimately totaling 3.7 GVAR for the S00kV Pacific Intente cl!os AC Project).Services provided include SOOKV yard extension,layout.sums geotechnical investigation and permit acquisition.Also included are equip specifications,raceway.cabling.schematics,grounding,communications.tnd *' DC station service.Seismic and wind loading requirements were extensive and 1...i detailed studies. POWER) TIMOTHY OSTERMEIER,P.E.2 O 500kV Series Capacitor Banks,Western Area Power Administration, California Project Manager for the series capacitor banks for the Western Area Power Administration's portion of the Third AC Project,consisting of four 500KV banks totaling 2.3 GVAR.Responsible for directing the design of platforms,platform bussing, detailed seismic analysis,foundation reactions and supporting site facilities.Additional duties included directing the construction and testing of a full-scale S5UOKV series platform seismic test to verify the correlation of modal analysis techniques and actual steel and insulator performance. O City of Anaheim,Fairmont Substation,California Project Engineer for a four-bay 60-12.47kV addition to an existing low-profile substation.Duties included directing all aspects of electrical design including specifications.physical design,control,relaying and communications.Other responsibilities included directing and coordinating the site geotechnical investigauions, site modifications.foundation design and structural steel design. O Northern California Power Agency,230kV Substation,California Project Engineer for a new 230kV ring bus to connect the new NCPA 50 MW STIG generation project to an existing Pacific Gas &Electric transmission line.Duties included coordination aspects of design among all participating entities,including PG&E,NCPA,STIG engineers and the City of Lodi.Additional duties included directing all aspects of electrical design including specifications,physical design control,relaying,and communications.Other responsibilities included directing and coordinating the site geotechnical investigations,site modifications,foundation design. and structural steel design. ©Large A/E Firm Project Engineer:Mr.Ostermeier was responsible for numerous substation projects ranging in size from one bay additions to very large projects.One involved two 345kV series capacitor banks.a five-breaker 345kV ring bus,a 600 MVA autotransformer,and miscellaneous 230kV expansions.Pnmary duties included supervising other engineers. technicians,drafting efforts (both manual and CADD).coordinating structural engineering efforts.and implementing client input and standards as required for the particular project.The numerous projects included variations of outdoor physi. arrangement,control.relaying metering,and station service design.Other assigninents included preparation of proposals.presentations.and personnel evaluations As a design engineer.his background includes the development of substation one one and three-line diagrams.designs of control schematics,bus strength calculstiecns lightning protection calculations,control circuit and raceway routing,and preparsin | circuit schedules.Other responsibilities have included specification reviews uid *4 evaluations for power transformers,power circuit breakers,switchgear ..msty equipment,and construction activiues.Mr.Ostermeier's design expenenes be.es performing power flow and fault studies using an IBM PC,preparing wo'4 documents for an AC,DC/AC (230/60/345kV)converter substauion,and .'+ control schematics and physical construction documents. CPOWER) TIMOTHY OSTERMEIER,P.E.3 Construction Management:Mr.Ostermeier participated as Construction Manager for a new substation project in Central Florida.Major responsibilities involved overseeing construction ofa 115k¥ring bus substation from site clearing through energization and conversion of an existing lattice steel radial substation to a low profile ring bus configuration while serving a critical load.Other responsibilities included approving payment certificates and assisting at two other substations on specific assignments as required during different phases of construction. Mr.Ostermeier also provided construction management services for a new 69kV substation on Florida's east coast,additions at two existing 69kV substations,a new four-mile 69kV transmission line with single and double circuit distribution underbuild, and several miles of overhead and underground 13.8kV distribution lines.In addition. the project included overseeing the installation of marine pilings for barge unloading facilities at the Municipal Power Plant Dock.His responsibilities extended from helping to obtain additional right of way.site and route clearing,and checkout and energization of new facilites. O Western Area Power Administration Substation Projects Mr.Ostermeier served as Engineering Manager or Project Engineer for numerous Western substations including: °Buffalo Bill,69kV *Shelby No.2,230kV |Heart Mountain,69kV e Dawson County,230kV e¢Glen Canyon,345kV ¢Harre,230kV e Flagstaff,345kV °Shelby,69kV ©North Cody,69kV e Miracle Mile,230kV O Lawrence Livermore Substation Testing,Western Area Power Administration,California Project Engineer for the pre-energization testing and wiring services for a new 230/115-13.8kV substation that serves the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in central California.POWER provided testing,electrical wiring,and calibration services for the station's major equipment.The project,which followed a fast-track schedule, was completed on time and within budget. O TransAlta Utilities,Chappice Lake Substation,Calgary,Alberta Mr.Ostermeier performed Quality Assurance/Quality Control for this 138 -24 9kV 30 MVA substation which was built to provide additional service to an oil pumping station POWER and TransAlta used a modem transfer system to send drawings to one another, allowing the project to be completed on time.A challenging aspect of the project included designing and building the station and control house to be expanded Other services provided by POWER were relay and control and a low-profile alununum bus design. LOWERNee ROGER CLAYTON,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: MEMBERSHIPS: EXPERIENCE: SVS STUDIES ENGINEER MSc,Aston University,Birmingham,United Kingdom,1968 BSc,Aston University,Birmingham,United Kingdom,1966 New York IEEE,Senior Member;Lightning and Insulator Subcommittee Member Mr.Clayton is a principal for Electric Power Consultants which he formed in 1986. Prior to EPC's incorporation,Mr.Clayton acquired 18 years of valuable power system studies experience with General Electric Company and Power Technoloiges, Incorporated.While at Power Technologies,Mr.Clayton worked on various studies involving power system transients and transmission line design.Below is a more detailed description of Mr.Clayton's background. GO Electric Power Consultants,Incorporated (EPC),Principal Mr.Clayton is currently the principal of Electric Power Consultants,Inc. Incorporated in 1986,EPI provides analytical services and products to theelectricutilityandindustrialpowersectors. OC)Power Technologies,Incorporated (PTI) Mr.Clayton was the Project Engineer for major transmission expansion studies involving AC/DC options,system load flow/stability performance,system compensation,selection of voltage level,system reliability,and economic comparison.During this ume he was appointed resident Project Engineer and consultant for a Venezuelan utility.His responsibility was for the performance and direction of system planning studies for the Guri 800kV expansion of the Venezuelan interconnected system.Mr.Clayton was also the Project Engineer for other major system projects in Mexico,Argentina,and Peru. Mr.Clayton was also the Manager of Power Delivery in the services department. He was responsible for the execution of client studies in the power delivery area. research in overhead line performance/optimization:and development of new product areas.Mr.Clayton has also testified as an expert witness involving transmission line performance and EMF. O General Electric Company,Electric Utility Engineering Operation Mr.Clayton's responsibilities at GE included studies of power system transients and transmission line destgn.Hts work involved the use of analog and digital techniques for modeling,analysis,and design of EHV systems.He also taught courses on insulation coordination,transmission line design,and utility practice Mr.Clayton had the additional responsibility of liaison engineer with GE's Protective equipment department,with special interest in station arrester application. CLIWE ROGER CLAYTON,P.E.2 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS: "The Price of Wheeling",Independent Energy Magazine,Sept.,1993. "Transmission Planning Models for Evaluating Wheeling Options,"APPA E&O Workshop. March 1993 (Co-author:D.L.LaForest). "Protection Issues for NUGS on Radial Distribution Systems,"Virginia,Maryland,and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives,Engineers Seminar,October 1992. ""Using Load Flow Models in Transmission Access Cases,"APPA E&O Meeting,Burlington, Vermont,July 1992. "Case Study of Radial Overhead Feeder Performance at 12.5kV and 34.5kV",IEEE Trans.IAS, Vol.26,No.4,July/August 1990 (Co-authors:J.M.Undrill,E.L.Shlatz). "The Behavior of Cogeneration Plants Relative to Distribution Circuits,"ECNE T&D Conference,May 1989. "Distribution Line Performance with [Imperfect Grounding,”IEEE Trans.IAS.Vol.24.No.5September/October 1988 (Co-author:J.M.Undrill). "Transmission Line Optimization,”[EEE paper TPC-6-84M-86,1986 Summer Power meeting, Mexico,DF (Co-author:[.S.Grant). "Optimization of Line Uprating,"1986 IEEE/PES T&D Conference,Anaheim,California (Co- authors:ILS.Grant,D.A.Douglas,R.E.Kennon,and A.M.DiGioia,Jr.). "The EPRI Transmission Line Optimization Program-TLOP,"SEEAC,April 1985 (Co-author LS.Grant). "Surge Arrester Protection and Very Fast Surges,”IEEE Paper 83 WM 112-0,1983 Winter Power Meeting (Co-authors:1S.Grant,D.E.Hedman,and D.D.Wilson). "Economic Input Boosts Line Optimization.”Electric Power and Light,July 1981. "Fundamental Optimization Study for Open Wire Transmission Systems,"DOE Repon DOE/CD/29325-1,February 1980 (Co-authors:L.O.Barthold,S.J.Balser.K.A.Clements. D.J.Lawrence,and V.J.Longo) "Compaction Techniques Applied to Transmission Line Uprating 41.6 to 115kV."IEEE paper 80 SM,661-9,Summer Power Meeting.1980 (Co-author:M.Broschat). "Digital Modeling of AC/DC Systems.”1980 International IEEE Conference.Winnipeg.Canad. (Co-authors:F.P.deMello.BK Johnson,and DE.Hedman).- "Progress Report on System Studies of the Venezuelan 800kV Transmission System.”CIGR! Committee 31,Paris,France.August 1978 (Co-authors:A.Alazrachi and D.Gardner) COTOWER WILLIAM E.GUNDY POSITION: EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: AFFILIATIONS: EXPERIENCE: SEISMIC SPECIALIST BS.,Aerospace Engineering,Northrop Institute of Technology,1970 M:S..Civil Engineering,California State University,Long Beach,California,1974 Idaho,California,Nevada,Utah,Minnesota,Oregon American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Mr.Gundy brings 25 years of experience in all aspects of seismic qualification of transmission and distribution equipment.This background features analysis of the major power distribution equipment suppliers,including: e ASEA Brown Boveri e Siemens Energy Automation General Electric e Square D Company MagnatTek Electric Mr.Gundy has worked around the world analyzing equipment for pipelines,off shore oil platforms,and nuclear power plants.Clients have included: e¢=Phillips Petroleum e Southern California Edison ° e Shell Oil Company e Los Angeles Department of Water &Power e Chevron Oil e San Diego Gas &Electric Below is a more detailed description of Mr.Gundy's seismic analysis background. O W.E.Gundy&Associates,Inc. Mr.Gundy has owned and operated this company for 10 years,specializing in seismic qualification of transmission and distribution equipment.His services in earthquake engineering includes the testing and analysis for the power distribution industry.He provides both analytical and testing techniques to evaluate civil structural systems.Mr. Gundy's structural analysis uses the most current state of the art finite element computer software. O Associate,ANCO Engineers,Inc. As an associate of the company.Mr Gundy was the lead member of the structural analysis group.specializing in structural analysis and dynamic earthquake analysis of many types of civil structures.including offshore drilling platforms,nuclear power plant equipment and components and electrical utility power distribution equipment O Aerospace Engineer,Rockwell International Corp. As Engineer.Mr Guady was responsible for structural design of airframe components for the B-l Bomber project EN UINE OTS@PDIWER LARRY D.HINZMAN POSITION: EDUCATION: EXPERIENCE: EMPLOYMENT/ PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: PUBLICATIONS: ARCTIC SOILS SPECIALIST Ph.D.,Soil Physics,University of Alaska,Alaska,1990 M.S.,Agronomy,Purdue University,Indiana,1981 B.S.,Soil Science,South Dakota State University,South Dakota,1979 B.S.,General Chemistry,South Dakota State University,South Dakota,1979 Mr.Hinzman is considered one of the world's experts in arctic soils.Mr.Hinzman's recent experience includes projects for NASA,EPA,USGS,National Science Foundation,Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory,the State of Alaska DOT,the U.S.Forest Service,British Petroleum,and ARCO. Mr.Hinzman's areas of expertise include the following:p g e Soil Science:Proficiency in thermal analysis through numerical and analytical solutions.Soil Physics and Soil Chemistry. e Hydrology:Extensive experience in field research and modeling surface and subsurface flow. e Remote Sensing:Experience with aerial photography,satellite imagery, thermography and ground based sensors. Assistant Professor of Water Resources:Water Research Center,Institute of Northern Engineering,University of Alaska Post-Doctoral Research Associate:Water Research Center,Institute of Northern Engineering,University of Alaska Graduate Research Assistant:\Nater Research Center,Institute of Northern Engineering. University of Alaska Agricultural Assistant:Agricultural Experiment Station,University of AlaskaEnvironmentalSciencesandRemoteSensingAssistant:Northern Technical Services Graduate Research Assistant:Laboratory for Application of Remote Sensing,Purdue University Villasenor.J.D..D.Ro Fathind and L D Hinzman,1993.Change Detection on Alaska's North Slope Using Repeat-p ++»ERS-1 SAR Images.[EEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.31(1)227-.5 Cooper,L.W..C.Solis.Dot)Rane and L.D.Hinzman.1993 Application of Oxygen-18 Tracer Technique to Arctic Hydsctoutc Processes.Arctic and Alpine Research,25(3)247- 255. Hinzman,L.D..D.Lo Kase cod K R Everett.1993.Hillslope Hydrology in an Arctic Setting.Sixth International ©.atcrcnce on Permafrost.5-9 July.1993 Bering,China Kane,D.L.,L.D.Hinvinan aig &K Lilly.1993.Use of Spatially Distributed Data to Model Arctic Hydrologic #rxesses Sixth International Conference on Permatrost.*-? July,1993.Beijing,China COPQWER LARRY D.HINZMAN 2 Hinzman,L.1992.Energy Balance or Index Method:Must We Choose?=Northern Research Basins Conference.Whitehorse.YT Canada. Hinzman,L.D.and D.L.Kane.1992.Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in Arctic Alaska.Northern Research Basins Conference.Whitehorse,YT Canada. Kane,D.L.,R.E.Gieck,G.Wendler and L.D.Hinzman.1992.Snowmelt at a small Alaskan arctic watershed 2.Energy related modeling results,Northern Research Basins Conference.Whitehorse,YT Canada. Hinzman,L.D.,G.Wendler,R.E.Gieck,and D.L.Kane.1992.Snowmelt at a small Alaskan arctic watershed |.Energy related processes.Northern Research Basins Conference.Whitehorse,YT Canada. Everett,K.R.,D.L.Kane and L.D.Hinzman.In Press.Surface Water Chemistry and Hydrology ofa Small Arctic Drainage Basin.J.Reynolds and J.Tenhunen (eds.)Landscape Function:Implications for Ecosystem Response to Disturbance.A Case Study in Arctic Tundra.Springer-Verlag.Ecologic Studies Series. Hinzman,L.D.and D L Kane In Press.Computer Simulations of the Thermal and Hydrologic Processes in Imnavait Watershed.J.F.Reynolds and J.D.Tenhunen (eds.) Landscape Function:Implications for Ecosystem Response to Disturbance.A Case Study in Arctic Tundra,Springer-Verlag.Ecologic Studies Series. Hinzman,L.D..D.L.Kane.C S Benson and K.R.Everett.In Press.Thermal and Hydrologic Processes in linnavait Watershed.J.R.Reynolds and J.D.Tenhunen (eds.) Landscape Function:Implications for Ecosystem Response to Disturbance.A Case Study in Arctic Tundra,Springer-Verlag.Ecologic Studies Series. Hinzman,L.D.and D.L Kane 1992.Potential response of an Arctic Watershed During a Period of Global Warming Journal of Geophysical Research -Atmospheres.97(D3):2811- 2820. Kane,D.L.,L.D.Hinzman St K Woo,and K.R.Everett.1992.Hydrology of the Arcuc Present and Future.in S Chapin.R Jeffries,G.Shaver,J.Reynolds,and J.Svaboda (eds ) physiological Ecology of Arcus Plants linplications for Climate Change.Academic Press. Inc.p 35-57. Hinzman,L.D.and D Lo Kane lvvt Snow Hydrology of a Headwater Arctic Basin 2 Conceptual Analysis and (.s-puter Modeling.Water Resources Research,17(6)LIf1-112! Hinzman.L.D..DOL Kise (&%Benson.and K.R.Everett.1991 Hvdrologic and Thermal properties of the Sse iver an the Alaskan Arctic.Cold Regions Science aad Technology.19(2):95-h 10 Hinzman.L.D..D.L Kaiw d e i Gieck 1991.Regional snow ablation in the Alaskan Arctic.T.D.Prowse aid ¢oS $1 Ommanney (eds.)Northern Hydrology.Selected Perspectives.NHRI Syinjy sc So 6 Saskatoon,Saskatchewan,p.121-140 CLQWER/ LARRY D.HINZMAN 3 Kane.D L.,L.D.Hinzman,C.S.Benson and G.E.Liston.1991.Snow Hydrology of a Headwater Arctic Basin 1,Physical Measurements and Process Studies.Water Resources Research,27(6):1099-1109. Kane,D.L.,L.D.Hinzman and J.P.Zarling.1991.Thermal Response of the Active Layer in a Permafrost Environment to Climatic Warming.Cold Regions Science and Technology. 19(2):111-122. Hinzman,L.D.1990.Interdependence of the Thermal and Hydrologic Processes of an Arctic Watershed and their Response to Climatic Change.Ph.D.Dissertation.University of Alaska.Fairbanks,Alaska. Hinzman,L.D.,J.D.Fox.D.L.Kane.1990.Soil Freezing in a Subarctic Deciduous Forest. K.R.Cooley (ed)International Frozen Soil Symposium.21-22 March 1990.Spokane. Washington.CRREL Special Report 90-1,p 21-30. Kane,D.L.,R.E.Gieck,and L.D.Hinzman.1990.Evapotranspiration from a Small Alaskan Arctic Watershed.Nordic Hydrology,21(4/5):253-272.| Kane,D.L.,L.D.Hinzman,C.S.Benson,and K.R.Everett.1989.Hydrology of Imnavait Creek,and Arctic Watershed.Holarctic Ecology,12:262-269 Kane,D.L.and L.D.Hinzman.1988.Permafrost Hydrology ofa Small Arctic Watershed Fifth International Permafrost Conference.2-5 August 1988.Trondheim,Norway.p 590- 595.Tapir Publishers. Hinzman,L.D..M.E.Bauer,and C.S.T.Daughtry.1986.Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Growth and Reflectance Characteristics of Winter Wheat.Remote Sensing of Environment.19:47-61. Hinzman,L.D.,M.E.Bauer.and C.S.T.Daughtry.1984.Growth and Reflectance Characteristics of Winter Wheat Canopies.LARS Technical Report 111484.Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing,Purdue University,West Lafayette,Indiana. Sparrow,S.S..C.W.Knight.L D Hinzman.1984.What Happens to Fertilizer Nitrogen' Agroborealis,Agriculture Experiment Station.University of Alaska.Vol.16.No | Hinzman,L.D.1981.Influence of Nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Rust on the Reflectume Characteristics of Winter Wheat Canopies.M.S.Thesis.Purdue University.West Lafayette,Indiana. PPOWER JAMES A.CUCULLU POSITION: EXPERIENCE: CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR Mr.Cucullu has resided in Alaska for the past 18 years.His experience includes project management and contract administration for utility and industrial related projects.He has dealt extensively with compliance,scheduling,and budget related contract issues for State, Federal.Municipal and private clients.Mr.Cucullu has experience in turnkey power generation systems including design,and permitting through installation and start-up. Mr.Cucullu's experience includes the following: Oo United States Air Force,Over the Horizon Backscatter Radar Mr.Cucullu was directly involved with the development of this proposal to build,own, and operate a 25 MW Coal/Oil fired power plant.Responsibilities included management and scheduling.budgeting and coordination of equipment acquisition inspection and modification Mr.Cucullu was also responsible for locating and negotiating the purchase of the coal resource needed to fuel this project for the term of. the contract.Mr.Cucullu lead the permitting and exploration efforts,which involved working with several State and Federal agencies as well as private land owners in the area.This project,although terminated for convenience by the USAF,was designed to operate under a 99.99 %RAM factor in Alaska's harsh Arctic environment. Process Safety Management Proqram,Petro Star Refinery,Valdez,Alaska Mr.Cucullu is currently the Project Manager for the design and implementation of a Process Safety Management Program for the Petro Star Valdez Refinery.Mr.Cucullu's responsibilities include scheduling,budgeting,contract administration and coordinauon of site visits and report preparation.This project includes compliance review of existing safety program and manuals.design ofa PSM program as required by OSHA 1910.119. Low-Rank Coal Water Fuel Commercial Demonstration Project (LRCWF) As Project Manager.Mr Cucullu is directly involved in evaluating existing equipment, such as the facility structure,substations,material handling equipment,controls and switchgear and turbine generators for hosting this project.Additional responsibiliues included assembling buducts and schedules for the project.As this project moves forwards,Mr.Cucullu will be responsible for project management,contract administration.engineering.nd construction management services.The thrust of this project is to convert a Josiaint power generation facility into a demonstration facility to produce a value added wo.tl based liquid fuel. Russian Coal-Combustion Technology Evaluation As Project Manager,Mr Creullu has been directing efforts to evaluate small power generation systems developed in the former Soviet Union.This evaluation tnctudes identifying manufacturtne capabilites,specification and integration of US contrul technologies and certification requirements for use in other parts of the world =[he Magadan region expericitces ispical winter conditions of -50°F which will require special considerations its fle cs luation process to ensure system reliability Mee EN2pDOWER) JAY KEELING,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: EXPERIENCE: SUBSTATION ENGINEER. B.S.,Electrical Engineering,Montana State University,1988 Mr.Keeling has more than five years of experience as an electrical engineer.His project experience involves substation and underground distribution design.Many of these projects have used REA design standards.As a station engineer,his experience includes layout, design,control,and coordinating efforts with structural/civil engineering,communications, geotech services,and construction support.He also has experience in studies,surveying, database applications,and computer assisted drafting. Mr.Keeling's background includes development Of one-line and three-line diagrams, equipment selection,controls,surge protection,ground grid calculations,coordination, equipment arrangement.underground design,ngid bus calculations.oi!containment,and stauion check-out.Mr.Keeling's experience also includes preparation of equipment, material,and construction specifications,as well as client interface. His representative project experience includes the following: O Lewis County Public Utility District,Tacoma Public Utilities'Mossyrock 230 kV Switchyard Addition,Washington As Substation Engineer on this 230 kV station addition,Mr.Keeling prepared matenal and equipment specifications as well as construction drawings.He was responsible for design,project coordination,and budgetary status.The project included a 230 kV line addition (add one breaker)to an existing five-breaker ring bus.microwave transfer trip, SCADA,inspection,and field testing.The project was funded by LCPUD,however.all design,construction inspection,and testing was approved by Tacoma Public Utilities. O City of Austin,Electric Utility Department,Grounding Study for Circuit 987, Texas As Project Engineer,Mr.Keeling performed resistivity tests along 17 miles of the proposed transmission line.The study included geological survey data,three foundation types,counter-poise design and measurements of the installations.He was responsible for project schedule.ineasurements,calculations.and design. O Midstate Electric Coop,Sunriver Substation Addition,50 MVA,69x25kV, Oregon As Project Engineer,Mr Keeling was responsible for project coordination,schedule. budget and overall design The project included the addition of one (1)30/40/50 MVA transformer with oil containment,relaying.and control house expansion O Bridger Valley Electric Association,Bigelow 69-12.5kV 10 MVA Substation,Wyoming Mr.Keeling.as Substution Engineer.was responsible for complete design.contract specifications and drawinys CPIM JAY KEELING,P.E. Echo Bay,Cove Project,Main Substation 5 Addition,120kV/12.5kV,10OMVA Feeder Addition As Substation Engineer,Mr.Keeling's responsibilities involved design,drawings and drafting. Minnesota Valley Electric Co-op,69-12.5kV Sectionalizing Study, Minnesota Mr.Keeling was the Design Engineer for a 69-12.5kV Sectionalizing Study for 16 stations and feeders. Park Electric Co-op,Chico 69-12.kV_5 MVA Substation,Montana Mr.Keeling,as Design Engineer,was responsible for complete design,contract, specifications and coordination of new station,feeders,and drawings. Lewis County Public Utility District,Glenoma Substation,75 MVA 230/69kV 10MVA,69/12.5kV,3750 kVA,Washington As Substation Engineer,Mr Keeling prepared material and equipment specifications as well as construction drawings.Also responsible for design.drafting,project coordination and budgetary status.Design included SCADA,microwave,and fiber optic ground wire communication. Ellsworth Air Force Base,EAFB System Upgrade from 4.16kV to 15kV, South Dakota As a Designer/Engineer,Mr.Keeling was responsible for field investigation,detailed design and calculations for new underground cable and equipment,database application, and construction drawings. Bonneville Power Administration,Mobile Transformer Installations, Washington,idaho,and Oreqon Mr.Keeling,as Project Engineer.was responsible for the mobile transformer installation project coordination He was instrumental in preparation of the mobile transformer installation drawings which show physical and electrical connections. temporary one-line diayram.control panels and wiring diagrams. Sheridan Electric Co-op,Daqmar 69-12.5kV 5 MVA Substation,Montana As Substation Engineer Mr Keeling was responsible for complete design.contract specifications and coordituition of new stauion,feeders,and drawings. BLOWER) LAN ALDER POSITION:PROJECT ENGINEER/SUBSTATION GROUP LEAD EDUCATION:AS,Desigw/Drafting Technology,Idaho State University.1981 EXPERIENCE:Mr.Alder is involved in all aspects of station design and supervision.In a design capacity, he performs the physical layout of stations including structure and foundation location,bus sizing and spacing,equipment placement,fencing and grounding,and cable and conduit runs.He also sizes and specifies all types of station equipment and produces material lists for procurement.He has been involved in the design and development of a variety of electrical protection and control schematics,wiring diagrams,instrument selection,auxiliary power systems,grounding systems,etc.In addition to his design responsibilities on a typical POWER station project,Mr.Alder supervises a group of engineers,designers and drafters, checks design drawings for correctness and quality,performs engineering and construction cost estimates,prepares construction bid and work units,coordinates station design with other project aspects,and interfaces with clients,manufacturers,and contractors. Other experience since joining POWER includes checking the work of engineers and designers assigned to other station projects,and functioning as a station designer and/or project engineeer on numerous projects.A partial list of station projects in which Mr.Alder has been involved,along with his responsibilities,are listed below: )O Snohomish County PUD,Halls Lake 115kV Switching Station,Washington Project Engineer for this 115kV six-breaker ring bus station.The project consisted of replacing the existing sectionalizing station with a fully automated ring bus station that can be converted to breaker-and-one-half.Responsibilities included station layout and development of all aspects of physical and electrical design,supervision of all design efforts,coordination with the owner and implementation of owner standards and procedures,development of equipment and construction specifications as well as equipment and construction cost estimates,and management of all resources necessary to maintain budget,schedule and quality.Being restricted to the existing site area provided significant challenges for the physical layout of the station.An extensive permitting process also created significant challenges. O Bonneville Power Administration/Western Area Power Administration, 500kV Series Capacitor Stations,Oregon/California Lead Substation Designer for this project that involved the addition of SOOkKV sertes capacitor installations -e1ght in Oregon and three in California.Responsibilitics included complete design and layout of the capacitor platforms and associated equipment,structures.and bus work.Several of these stations also required significant additions to the adjacent SOOkV yards such as airbreak switches,structures,and bus work. O City of Lodi,Industria!60kV/12kV Substation,California Lead Substation Designer for this double-breaker,double-bus station.Responsible fer many different tasks including the design and layout of the relay,control,and metenay panels,the three line diagrams.and the schematic diagrams.In addition,he supenis<d the design and layout of the station arrangement,structures,bus arrangement uc grading,foundations.and control building.He performed the design and layout cl the CRIMES LAN ALDER AC power system,DC emergency power system,control building lighting,station grounding,and the conduit and cable system.All design work on this project was completed within three months. Beluga 138-230kV Substation,Alaska Lead Substation Designer responsible for final development of station physical layout for this new five-terminal,600 MVA substation facility near Anchorage,Alaska.Laid out structure and foundation locations,determined bus sizing and spacing,and designedfencingandgroundingsystem.Supervised layout and drafting of CADD drawings produced for the project.Station necessitated design for severe weather and Zone 4 (.5g)seismic forces,as well as interface with an existing 138kV substation. A challenging aspect of this station was that a stream running through the site had to be Culverted under the site.The stream channel could not be relocated due to the impact on spawning salmon. CUC Highgate 46kV Station,Vermont Lead Substation Designer for this distribution switching station.Responsible for station layout including bus arrangement,equipment selection and sizing,equipment specifications,structure and equipment locations,drawing development supervision, equipment and construction cost estimates,and construction contract and specification preparation.The station featured a six-breaker ring bus that was designed for future expansion.The transformer bays were also designed for expansion.A unique feature of this station involved its automatic synch-check transfer of power,which then tripped off the original source.The client's goal for this system was a flexible,reliable switchingstationfortheir46kVsystem. 115kV Scott Receiving Station Upqrade,City of Santa Clara,California Mr.Alder was the Project Engineer for this project that involved the addition of one L15kV tie breaker position.The project included primarily civil and structural services, including a geotechnical investigation,site preparation,structure design,concrete panel wall,oil spill containment.grounding,landscaping and irrigation plan,and construction cost estimates.Interesting features of this project included design of an all-concrete panel wall that had to mutch the existing wall at the station.Site preparation for this Station was also a challenge because of the high water table and unstable soils identified at the site. Carlin 120kV Transmission Project,Nevada Lead Substation Designer for two station facilities forming part of this new power supply system to serve the needs ofa new gold quarry and improve service to the town of Carlin,Nevada.Responsible for complete physical layout of the Carlin 120-24 9kV Substation and the Fightmle Creek 120kV Switching Station,including bus arrangements,Laid out drawings for both stations and supervised draftsmen.Sized equipment,wrote equipment specifications,and developed material list as well as coordinating design with vil mvolved departments and interfacing with multiple chests and the contractor Both lacililes were energized on schedule and within budget CDIMER LAN ALDER Christmas Valley-Radar Site -115kV Switching Stations -Oreqon Lead Substation Designer responsible for station layout including bus arrangement. equipment selection and sizing,equipment specifications,structure and equipment locations,drawing development supervision,equipment and construction cost estimates, and construction contract and specification preparation.The project included three I15kV switching stations as part of a transmission system to provide power to a new USAF West Coast radar installation in central Oregon.The system consists of 45 miles of 115kV transmission line,three substations served by three switching stations,and dual Master Stations for a SCADA monitoring system.Duties included station layout, equipment selection,drawing development supervision,cost estimating,and contract and specification preparation. USAF West Coast Radar System 115-12.47kV Substations,Oreqon Lead Substation Designer responsible for station layout including bus arrangement, equipment selection and sizing,equipment specifications,structure and equipment locations,drawing development supervision,equipment and construction cost estimates, and construction contract and specification preparation.The project included three 115-12.47kV substations for the power system to USAF's Over-the-Horizon Backscatter West Coast Radar System in Central Oregon.These three substations are 114-12.47kV-480/277k V-208/120kV.One station requires two 12.47kV overhead lines exiting the station.The other two stations each require one overhead line. Echo Bay Mines Cove Project,Main 120/24.9kV-120/4.16kV Substation, Nevada Lead Substation Designer for a new substation in northern Nevada,responsible for station layout including bus arrangement,equipment selection and sizing,equipment specifications,structure and equipment locations,drawing development supervision, equipment and construction cost estimates,and construction contract and specification preparation.The substation featured four transformer bays,two 120-24.9kV and two 120-4.16kV,with 24 9kV underground distribution and 4.16kV bus duct to the switchgear.The fast-track engineenng design was completed four months after notice to proceed and under budvet South Butte 230-69kV Substation,Idaho Checker responsible for the Jorrectness and accuracy of the assembly.foundation,steel. grounding,and other (pes of drawings associated with this environmentally-designed facility in central [dalho =Construction of the dual transformer,100 MVA substation resulted in less than $]or in Contractor extras. Spar Canyon 230kV Switching Station,!daho Lead Substation Designer tor this aesthetically-designed switching/sectionalizing facility in central Idaho.Responsible for complete station tayout and bus arrangement Performed drawing lavewt and supervised draftsmen.Coordinated station design with other departments and ;recject aspects Station was designed and constricted on 4 fast-track schedule duc io tune Constrams. CLQWER CHUCK CADIENTE,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: EXPERIENCE: SUBSTATION ENGINEER .- B.S.,Electrical Engineering,Gonzaga University,1989 EE,Idaho;EIT,Washington Mr.Cadiente is responsible for the technical design of new stations and the upgrade of existing station projects.He has been involved in a variety of station projects at POWER. Responsibilities have included design of new substation facilities,feeder bay installations, relaying schemes,transformer installations,breaker change-outs and installations,AC and DC station service load requirements,SCADA,and metering.Mr.Cadiente has been involved in testing and energization of station facilities.Mr.Cadiente's design experience is supplemented by a background in surveying and drafting.He is also well versed in a variety of CAD software and database packages. Mr.Cadiente's project experience includes the following: O Northern California Power Agency,230kV Substation,Lodi,California Substation Engineer responsible for the complete design of the new substation facilities. The station consisted of a 230kV,3-breaker ring bus (with provisionsfor a 5-breaker ring bus)connecting into the adjacent combustion turbine generation plant and to PG&E's 230kV transmission line.The project involved coordination with the generation plant and to PG&E communication and relay schemes. OO Substation Oil Containment Project,Idaho Power Company,Idaho,Oregon Project involved site assessment,oil containment design,and Spill Prevention Conuol & Countermeasure Plan development for each station in Idaho Power's system.236 stations are involved in the project.Mr.Cadiente is a Substation Engineer involved in field investigation,data gathering and design of oil containment basins for the project. O Western Area Power Administration,Flaming Gorge Substation,Utah Substation Engineer for the environmental audit of this facility.Project consisted of conducting audits of spill prevention control and containment practices,procedures and oil containment systems and PCB compliance. O Bonneville Power Administration,Burntwoods 23-115kV Substation, Washington Mr.Cadiente was the Project Engineer for this substation.The project involved breaker change-out and redesign of all above grounding. O City of Boulder City 69-12.5kV Number Four Substation,Nevada Provided engineering services for this substation upgrade.Project involved 'ec installation of two transformers and six open bus feeder bays to accommodate increased load requirements.Responsibilities included metering,SCADA,and breaker «i transformer connections CRIMEA CHUCK CADIENTE,P.E.2 o BPA/GE S500kV Series Capacitors,Third AC Intertie Project,Oreqon Responsible for bus layout and yard design for BPA's Sand Springs #1 and #3,SYCAN #1,and Fort Rock #3 compensation stations. Rabbit Creek Mining,Pit 120-4.16kV Substation,Bay 2 Addition,Nevada Substation Engineer responsible for complete design of the upgrade facilities.The upgrade involves addition of a new bay consisting of a transformer,regulators and a recloser. Shasta Dam PUD,Central Valley 115-12.47kV,Substation Bay 2 Addition, California Substation Engineer responsible for electrical design of a bay addition.The addition included a transformer,circuit switcher and power circuit breaker. TransAlta Utilities,Chappice Lake 138-24.9kV Substation,Canada Substation Engineer involved in electrical design of this new 138-24.9kV station.The station is being designed to provide better voltage regulation and increased capacity for an intersecting 24.9kV line.The project includes site preparation,geotechnical review, structure and foundation design,and detailed electrical design. City of Anaheim,Fairmont 69-12.47kV Substation Bay 2 Addition, California Substation Engineer responsible for the complete design of the upgrade facilities.The upgrade consisted of the four 69kV breakers to the existing main and transfer scheme,a SOMVA transformer,and 15kV switchgear. Citizens Utilities Company,Hiqhgqate 46kV Substation Addition,Vermont Substation Engineer responsible for the complete design for the upgrade facilities The upgrade consisted of the installauon of a 46kV breaker to an existing ring bus)The installation included metering.relaying and SCADA point additions.Mr Cadiente w.ts also responsible for testing and energization of the project. Douglas County Public Utility District,Terry 115-13.8kV Substation Addition,Washington Substation Engineer responsible for the design for the upgrade facilites.The upyr ice consisted of a LISKV circuit switcher,25MVA transformer,2 ISkV reclosers.iid it associated relaying and metering OeCPOWER) CHUCK CADIENTE,P.E.3 O Citizens Utilities Company,120-46kV Northern Substation Expansion Project,Vermont Lead Engineer responsible for the complete design of a new 120-46kV substation at Newpon,Vermont.The station consisted of a 120kV four-breaker ring bus,two 20MVA transformers,a 46kV six-breaker ring bus,a 1SMVA transformer,and all associated relaying,metering,and SCADA installations.The project also consisted of upgrades to the Highgate Substation to accommodate a 120-46kV SOMVA transformer to the existing ring bus and upgrades to the Irasbug and Newport Center 46kV Substation.Other responsibilities included construction support and testing and energization. O Echo Bay 24.9-4.16kV Portal -Cove Substations,Nevada Mr.Cadiente was the Station Engineer for this project which served a mine near Battle Mountain,Nevada.The Cove Substation required a new feeder bay to servea new distribution line.The bay featured an underground feeder to the new line which connects to the new Portal Substation.Mr.Cadiente was also responsible for connections to the Portal Substation. O City of Lodi Industrial 60kV Substation,California Mr.Cadiente sized the DC requirements for this large substation in north central California.The station consists of a 60kV switchyard with seven 60kV positions (12 breakers total)and space for three future 60kV positions.The switchyard is arranged in a double bus-double breaker configuration.The substation also includes a 12kV yard with four 12kV feeders and one 60/12kV transformer position initially and space for two more 60/12kV transformer positions. O Ormat,Soda Lake Geothermal #2 69-13.8kV Substation,Nevada Substation Engineer responsible for the design of this station for Ormat's geothermal plant.The station includes a circuit switcher,transformer and metal-clad switchgear O Pacific Power Troutdale-Cully Substation Upqrades,Oregon Mr.Cadiente was involved in the engineering services for two of the four station upgrades required for the new Troutdale-Cully Project near Portland,Oregon.The stations were the Harnson 115kV Switching Station and the Cully 115-12.47kV Substation.Mr.Cadiente was responsible for change-out of the oil circuit breakers to gas circuit breakers and adding relays and SCADA points for these station facilities QO Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Coop.Quincy 69-12.47kV Station,California As Station Engineer for this upgrade project,Mr.Cadiente was responsible for the changout of the oil circuut breakers to gas circuit breakers,adding relaying and metering,and defining the DC battery system. .BLOWER DONALD ANGELL,P.E. POSITION:REACTIVE COMPENSATION PROJECT ENGINEER EDUCATION:M.S.,Electrical and Computer Engineering,University of Idaho,1984 B.S..Engineering and Applied Science,UCLA,1959 REGISTRATION:Alaska,California,Idaho,Nevada EXPERIENCE:Mr.Angell performs a full spectrum of studies and analyses related to electrical system design,system protection,and SCADA systems.For utility and industrial clients,he has conducted numerous system feasibility and planning studies,work plans,long-range plans, load flow studies,short circuit and protection analyses,SCADA system designs,and communication system studies and designs.He has designed sophisticated relaying packages for looped transmission systems,directional comparison blocking schemes,protective schemes for radially fed transmission and distribution lines,and station protective relaying, metering and control systems for several station facilities. Other systems engineering experience includes determination of BIL and insulation coordination requirements for line and station components,large cyclic loads on rural distribution systems and DC excavator impacts on electrical systems.Representative projects that illustrate the extent and diversity of Mr.Angell's system engineering and protecuon experience follow. O Chuqach Electric Association,Transfer Trip Communications,Alaska Mr.Angell designed a communication system that integrates the transfer tnpping scheme with the existing Chugach Electric microwave system.The transfer tripping system protects Chugach's facilities in south central Alaska,which include 10 stations and interconnecting 230kV,138kV,and 115kV transmission lines.For this project.Mr. Angell provided the conceptual design,equipment specifications,installation specifications,and construction inspection. O Mapco Main Plant 69-13.8kV Substation,North Pole,Alaska For Mapco's North Pole Refinery Expansion Mr.Angell performed conceptual design, interface design to the plant electrical system,system studies,and protection and control design.Located in Alaska's sub-Arctic zone,design of the facility presented several engineering challenges,including the design of special relaying arrangements to protect the station and utility supply against reverse power flow from in-plant generation O Railbelt Utilities Kenai Intertie Study,Alaska Study Engineer responsible for the system studies and conceptual system designs for 4 proposed new transmission line intertie between Anchorage and the Kena Peninsula Studies included load flow,stability analysis,and reliability for various transmission line routes and voltages Conceptual system designs included undersea crossings. terminals,substations.and ue lines A report was prepared for Alaska Power Authority with recommended alternatives CPOE DONALD ANGELL,P.E. . 2 O Negative Sequence Study,Anchorage Area Transmission System,Alaska This study was performed for Chugach Electric Association,Inc..to determine the effects on the Anchorage area transmission system of opening one phase of the Pirelli undersea cable between Point Mackenzie and Point Woronzof.The Electrocon PSA Short Circuit Program was utilized for this project.The program simultaneously applics the open conductor and load simulation faults to the system model and calculates positive,negative,and zero sequence currents and voltages.Five computer nuns with different line outage conditions were analyzed. ©Northeast Transmission Intertie Feasibility Study Alaska Senior Systems Engineer for a study to provide feasibility-level design,cost estimates and associated engineering,route selection,and permitting studies for the line sections as weli as stations making up the proposed intertie.The intertie would parallel the existing intertie between the Anchorage and Fairbanks area utilities.The first phase involves analyzing the transmission system and performing a reconnaissance study to determine an alternate and a preferred route.The second phase includes the transmission system design.This complex study project was completed on a fast-track basis. O Spar Canyon 230kV Switching Station,Idaho Systems Engineer responsible for design of protective relaying and control circuits for this primary switching/sectionalizing facility constructed as part of a major power supply system for a large molybdenum mine in mountainous central Idaho.Designed zone distance protective relaying system as well as relaying for a 25 MVA reactor.Also designed and supervised the installation and checkout of protective relay,control and metering systems for two other stations in the new system. OG Salmon River Electric Cooperative SCADA System,Idaho Systems Engineer for this SCADA system for a cooperative in mountainous central Idaho.The SCADA system is used to control and monitor a 100 MVA 230-0UkV substation.Responsibilities include SCADA system operation design,interface design, installation and testing.Like the system above,this unique SCADA system employs "smart"RTUs and a MCU to monitor and control system-wide station parameters Communication is carried over the public-switched telephone network,and RT(s ure capable of initiating communications with the MCU and reporting alarm conditions O Dry Creek-Tincup Communication Link,Wyoming Systems Analyst for a fiber optic communication system for 30 miles of ive double-circuit 161kV transmission line POWER designed near Afton.Wyomine ts system links the utility's Afton and Jackson offices.to serve as a medi 4 communications,switching,and remote metering. @POWER DONALD ANGELL,P.E.3 O Cyprus Thompson Creek Mine Power Supply Project,Idaho Systems Engineer responsible for system feasibility,protection and planning studies, and long-range plan to determine optimum power supply to provide reliable service to a $460 million molybdenum mine in central Idaho.Major components of the power system Mr.Angell recommended consisted of 96 miles of 230kV transmission line,40 miles of 69kV transmission line with 24.9kV underbuild,a 230kV switching station, two 230-69kV substations,two 69-24.9kV substations,a 69kV mine loop feed with 24.9kV underbuild.complete pit electrics.and up-grades to existing station facilities - all of which were subsequently designed and constructed. OO Edwards Air Force Base Electrical System Upgqrade,California Mr.Angell was the Senior Systems Engineer to study and design electrical power supply and distnbution system improvements at Edwards Air Force Base.The project included the design of new switching stations,substations.transmission lines,distribution lines. and a new network of underground utilities.The improvements to the electrical system would provide a more reliable power supply to meet the increased electrical demands at Edwards.As part of its services.POWER developed a power system plan that could be expanded for Edwards Air Force Base over the next 40 years.The project involved assistance in negotiating power supply issues with the local uulity,Southern California Edison.Mr.Angeli's specific responsibilities included power flow studies.system analysis,and report preparation.The existing electrical distribution system was a non-effectively grounded underground distribution system with delta-connected transformers.Mr.Angell studied the switching,ferroresonance,lightning arrestors, sizing,capacitor switching,and relay coordination to improve system performance and protection. O Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL)230kV Project,California Systems Engineer for various preliminary systems engineering tasks associated with this major 230kV transmission project in Northern California.Studies performed included determination of electric losses associated with underground portions of route alternatives,overhead and underground electromagnetic interference imposed on the ILS system at the Sacramento Municipal Airport by the proposed 230kV transmission line,and an investigation of available fiber optics communications systems as one of the alternative communications systems being considered for the project. O Grant County Hydroelectric Dam Grounding Study,Washington Study Engineer responsible for the analysis of the grounding system at Grant County's Wanapum and Priest Rapids hydroelectric factlimes.The results of the grounding studies were recommendations for the grounding of a distributed control AGC system involving PLC's.RTD data hizhway,and central computer.The grounding study :iiso addressed GPR between vround mats of facilities associated with the hydroelectric dams A report was prepared recommending grounding methods and system protection for GPR. 2 DOWER)Mane Ae PHILLIP STENBERG,P.E. 'POSITION:PROJECT CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EDUCATION:MSCE,Montana State University,1977 BSCE,Montana State University,1975 REGISTRATION:Alaska,California,Montana,Washington,Idaho,Nevada,Wyoming,Minnesota,North Carolina,Maine EXPERIENCE:Mr.Stenberg brings to POWER more than |5 years of experience in civil and structural engineering.His most recent work experience has been in the planning,design, modifications,and construction of office buildings,substation facilities,warehouses, manufacturing facilities,pulp and paper facilities,and industrial structures.His areas of particular expertise include: Foundations Steel structures Masonry wall buildings Concrete structures Pipe and vessel supports His project experience includes the following: O Crystal Lake Hydroelectric Facility Evaluation and Betterment,Including Pump-Back Storage,Tailrace Repair and Water Bypass Upgqrade, Petersburg,Alaska Civil/Structural Engineer for this two-phase project to evaluate and make recommendations on existing 400 and 1800 kW hydroelectric generation facilities,and then to implement design changes as necessary.Mr.Stenberg was responsible for collection of data used to evaluate the facility,and for design of a pump-back storage installation to recover reservoir leakage water,a water bypass system to supply water to the Crystal Lake Hatcher.and tailrace repair to correct the water leakage problem in the existing tailrace Mr Stenberg also coordinated consultant activiues and participated in FERC 5-sear safety inspection. O Neets Bay Fish Hatcher,Alaska Civil/Structural Engineer tor this fish hatchery project which recovered water through a diversion from an existing stream Responsibilities included design of the diversion structure.and the pipeline co the hatchery.Project also included fish ladder design O Swan Lake 22 MW Hydroelectric Project,Alaska Senior Engineer for «fs 1 °3-loot-high double curvature elliptical concrete arch dam in southeastern Alaska.peas Ketchikan.Responsibiliues included the design of this structure,the first of Ws wid built in North America,analysis of the foundations for the dam and the power inisee sinacture,and the design of the power intake structure aid access roads. CPIUER PHILLIP STENBERG,P.E 2 O Sultan River 115 MW Upqrade Project,Washington Civil/Structural Engineer on this project near Everett,Washington,which involved raising an existing carth dam by approximately 90'and adding power generation capability.Mr.Stenberg was responsible for dam design,and design of retaining walls used to keep runoff from contanunating watershed with construction-related silt.Mr. Stenberg also designed new bridge abutments and roads required by the resulting rise in the water level.and worked closely with environmental specialists and engineers to develop the design. OG The Industrial Company,Heber 33 MW Geothermal Power Plant,Heber, California As Project Civil/Structural Engineer,Mr.Stenberg performed total foundation design for a 33 MW geothermal power plant.He designed the foundations for the vaporizers. pre-heaters,turbine/generators,and other miscellaneous other structures.POWER, working on an extremely fast-track schedule,completed the plant design concurrent with the construction schedule.The project was on-line seven months after the start of POWER's design work.. O The Industrial Company,Rye Patch 12.5 Geothermal Power Plant, Pershing County,Nevada Civil/Structural Engineer for a 12 SMW geothermal power plant project.the purpose of which is to enable the production and furnish electricity to Sierra Pacific Power Company.Mr.Stenberg created the total foundation design for the project.this included the foundations for the air coolers,vaporizers,pre-heaters.turbine/generators. pumps.tanks,three buildings,pipe supports and substation structures.POWER,on a fast-track schedule.completed the plant design concurrently with construction. O Potlatch Corporation,Las Vegas Converting Facility,Warehouse Expansion,Nevada Project Structural Engineer for this 150,000 square foot addition to Potlatch's existing converting facility warehouse Mr Stenberg is responsible for the building structural design.and is assisting the Proyect Architect with architectural layout design O Jim Bridger Power Plant Warehouse/Office and Outside Resources Buildings,Pacific Power,Wyoming Project Lead Civil/Strictur ul f ugineer responsible for the design of a two stor outside resources building and 1 ihree story combination warehouse and office building Responsibilities include!icsizn of precast tlt-up concrete walls.steel stati framing.masonry walls foors metal walls,stairs,elevator support structure.ware tise unloading dock.drilled pier foundations,spread footing foundations,retaining wu slabs on grade.grade beans and all interfaces and connections with existing butidiss s POWER) PHILLIP STENBERG,P.E 3 o Edwards Air Force Base,Switching Stations and Substations,California Lead Civil/Structural Engineer for design of three new switching stations and four new substations at Edwards Air Force Base.Mr.Stenberg was responsible for the design of three masonry switching station buildings,four prefabricated metal substation buildings, site drainage at all sites,electrical equipment steel support structures,masonry wall fences,and foundations for electrical equipment and buildings.Mr.Stenberg was also responsible for the field survey and geotechnical drillings. Amalqamated Suqar Company Process Building,!daho Civil/Strictural Engineer responsible for the design of a new three-story sugar process building constructed in two stages --the first two floors in 1988 and the third story in 1989.Responsibilities included the design of the building's concrete floors,masonry wall,double "T"concrete walls,drainage system,and architectural details. Blue Lake Dam Safety Evaluation,Sitka,Alaska Senior Engineer responsible for special FERC safety inspection to determine if water spilling from the dam's spillway into the plunge pool was undermining the dam's foundations.Mr.Stenberg conducted an analysis of the site data and wrote the inspection report. Christmas Valley Radar Site -115kV Switching Stations,Oregon Civil/Stnictural Engineer for three switching station structure foundations.The stations are a part of a transmission system to provide power to a new USAF West Coast radar installation in central Oregon. City of Columbus,Ohio Refuse/Coal-Fired Power Piant,Ohio Civil/Structural Engineer for the modifications and additions required to the existing facility.Responsible for design of four new steel framed buildings to be added to the plant and structural modification required in existing facilities to install a new refuse and ash handling system. Coal-Fired Heating Plant,State Hospital,Colorado Civil/Structural Engineer for the design of a steam heating plant.Responsibilit.cs include the design of a steel framed building,site drainage system,structural modifications to existing facilities,and foundations for vibrating equipment in fhe heating plant. East Mesa Well Field Facilities,California Civil/Structural Engincer for the design of drilled pier foundation for pipeline s5 55 75 for the design of the Eust Mesa Well Field Facilities consisting of two IX >°°4 geothermal units. @PDOWER_/ EUGENE WILTGEN,PE POSITION: EDUCATION: REGISTRATION: EXPERIENCE: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BS,Electrical Engineer,Iowa State University,1963 California,lowa,Nebraska Mr.Wiltgen's 44 years of experience in electrical engineering encompasses nearly every aspect of transmission projects.Voltage experience ranges from subtransmission levels to EHV,including 345kV and S5O0kV.Much of his background includes project management, overseeing all phases of transmission line and substation projects.This includes planning, project scheduling,cost estimating,design,right of way acquisition,contract administration,construction management,and procurement.Projects have been as far away as Saudi Arabia and Nigeria.They have required supervising a staff as large as 150 at one time.In addition to consulting engineering,Mr.Wiltgen has held management positions for utilities.For POWER Engineers,Mr.Wiltgen is a senior engineer for EHV transmission line and substation projects. OO Nebraska Public Power District Construction Manager,head of the Construction Management Department for this utility.Department included right of way agents,inspectors,surveyor,and material expediters.Responsible for all phases of transmission,distribution,substation,and power plant site acquisition and land management.Supervised staff of 10 engineers and 20 technicians. O Consulting Engineer As a consulting engineer,managed nearly all phases of various transmission line projects,ranging from 4.2kV to 345kV.Responsibilities included managing design, estimating costs,matenal procurement,construction,and preparing reports and contracts for transmission lines.In addition to these management responsibilities,has also been a consulting engineer involved in survey,design,public relations,nght of way acquisition,and associated work with civil and electrical engineering and construction projects. OO Fiber Optic Groundwire /Structural Analysis,Montana Project Engineer in charge of nght of way services,structural design,and construction management services for 500 mules of fiber optic groundwire (FOGWire)on existing transmission lines in the state of Montana.In all,there were approximately 3,800 structures with 125 unique designs represented in the 500 miles of line.The route crosses more than two-thirds of the state of Montana,necessitating coordination with several agencies,including BLM,the National Bison Range,and the Flathead Indians. A large and expernenced team was necessary to expedite MPC's compressed time schedule for the project.The project also involved compiling wind and weight span data for load calculation and inspection during construction phases as well as testing and close-out at the end of the construction.The project was completed on schedule and within budget. CODIWER EUGENE WILTGEN,PE 2 og | lowa Public Service Company Transmission Engineer responsible for all transmission line engineering and construction projects.Projects consisted primarily of 69kV,161kV,and 345kV lines. Coordinated activities of consulting engineers,checking and approving all design and material specifications.Supervised right of way acquisition,served as an expert witness in commerce commission hearings,condemnation hearings,district court appeals cases,and various law suits. The L.E.Myers Company,Saudi Arabia Engineering Manager for a $60 million transmission project in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia.Project consisted of 33kV and 13.8kV electric lines,seven 33/13.8kV substations,and associated streets and utilities.Responsibilities included administrative management of design,material procurement,and construction.Supervised a staff of 30 engineers and 120 craftsmen. Nebraska Electric Generation &Transmission Cooperative Assistant Manager for this cooperative that consisted of 24 rural electric systems. Negotiated rates as well as carrier and wheeling contracts.Consulting services involved management,engineering,materials,construction,and equipment. San Diego Gas &Electric,California Project Administrator responsible for planning,scheduling,and controlling the contracts for transmission projects ranging from 13.8kV to 500kV.Projects included both transmission lines and substations and associated streets and utilities.Also responsible for ensuring project quality,in accordance with engineering plans and specifications,and adherence to project budget.Supervised staff of 15 engineers and 130 craftsmen. Southwest Power Link Project Manager for a mayor 5O0kV transmission line from Arizona to southern California.The project included both lattice steel and tubular steel structures.Included in the project was the design of a special structure for the Colorado River crossing. Public Service Companyof Colorado,New Denver Airport 230kV Line Mr.Wiltgen is the Lead Construction Inspector for this major new 230kV transmission line project.He is responsible for overseeing construction management and construction inspection. OLOWER) (- JAMES "BO"HAYES POSITION: EXPERIENCE: RESIDENT ENGINEER/LEAD INSPECTOR Mr.Hayes has more than 40 years of experience in construction and maintenance of transmission and distribution lines as well as substations.Throughout this time,Mr.Hayes has been a lineman,contractor,line inspector,and line superintendent.He has worked on projects for numerous REA''s,utilities and co-op's,as well as the Western Area Power Administration.Mr.Hayes'project experience includes the following: O City of Lodi,Industrial GOkV_Substation,California Mr.Hayes was the Lead Inspector for this new POWER-designed substation on the east side of Lodi.The project included several 60kV line segments to interconnect the new station with existing Pacific Gas &Electric and City of Lodi 60kV lines.The station consists of a 60kV switchyard with seven 60kV positions and space for three future 60kV positions.The switchyard is arranged in a double bus-double breaker configuration to provide high reliability at the City's main substation. O)Midstate Electric Coop.,115kV Transmission &Substation System,Oregon Mr.Hayes was the Lead Inspector for this POWER-designed 115kV transmission system for a new U.S.Air Force radar installation in central Oregon.The system consists of nearly 45 mules of 115kV transmission line and three 115kV switching stations. O 220kV Project,California Lead Inspector for this POWER-designed 220kV steel-pole transmission line in southern California. O Bayview 115/24.9kV Substation,Oregon Lead Inspector for this 115/24.9kV substation in Walport,Oregon,for Consumer Power. O Box Canyon Dam -Mt Shasta 115kV Transmission Line,California General Superintendent in charve of construction and inspection of this [{5kV transmission line,iis)seod pole,H-frame line was built along an existing distribution line.Mr Haves was responsible for inspection of all staking,traming, digging and setting.s.«cll 2s conductor stringing.This line went from the Box Canyon Dam and tied nts the nearest Pacific Power line near Mt.Shasta. O Casper-Waltman 115«V_Transmission Line,Wyoming Lead Inspector for 4 38 sue transmission line in Natrona County,Wyoming.Work included removing uheut 47 miles of 69kV and one (1)mile of 11SkV transmission line on both steel pole and acod pole structures.The line features three 477,000 Gircular mile,ACSR,26/7 ceruaciors and 3/8-inch diameter,high-strength,7-strand ov eihesd ground wire,with one .°cund wire on the steel pole section and two ground wires n the wood pole H-stru sure exten CROMER) JAMES "BO"HAYES 2 a)Davis Dam -Riveria 230kV_Transmission Line,Arizona Superintendent of all phases of construction for this 230kV single pole wood transmission line,originating at the Davis Dam and terminating at Riveria Substation near Bullhead City,Arizona.Was also a line inspector for Arizona Electric Power Coop.,and inspected a 230kV wood pole line paralleling the line that was built for a contractor the previous season. Dry Creek -Valley-Tincup 161kV Transmission Line,Wyoming and Idaho Lead Inspector for an 80 mile loop through the rugged,mountainous terrain of western Wyoming.This predominantly H-frame wood pole line included 19 miles of single pole steel structures designed for 12.5/7.2 underbuild.Mr.Hayes performed all construction supervision and final inspection duties for this high-altitude line. Walnut Creek 115/24.9kV Substations Lead Inspector for this 115/24.9kV substation. Escondido -Poway 115 kV Transmission Line,California General Superintendent for the rebuild of 20 miles of LI5kV transmission line in California.Mr.Hayes was responsible for all construction phases of this line which was upgraded from 69kV to 115kV with a complete changeout of poles and conductor. Midway-Sunset 230 kV Transmission Line,California Lead Inspector for the Muidway-Sunset Cogeneration Project transmission line consisting of 19 mules of wood pole H-frame transmission line and situated in the southwestern portion of the San Joaquin Valley. Newmont Gold,Mill 2/5 Tailings and Pit Dewatering 14.4/24.9kV Distribution Line,Nevada Mr.Hayes.was the Lead Inspector for this distribution line. Noxon Mountain -Wallace 230kV Transmission Line,Idaho General Superintendent responsible tor all construction phases of this 57 mule line This double circuit line,owned and operated by Washington Water Power,was buiit with steel H-frame structures to replace an older single pole wood line.The old fine was removed by helicupter.and installation of the new line was done in a similar manner.The new structures were placed by helicopter in preset caissons,and then grouted plumb once thes were sel. Tri-Dam -Strawberry 115kV Transmission Line,California General Superintendent responsible for all phases of construction of this 8 mile fine This line was originally Purl for Pacific Gas and Electric to bring power trom the -- Dam power generation poyest'This LISKY wood H-frame line was constricicd °> International Line Busters TOWER)Fewer oF SHAWN W.CREA,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: AFFILIATIONS: REGISTRATION: EXPERIENCE: PROJECT MECHANICAL ENGINEER e BSME,University of Idaho,1986 e Graduate Courses,Engineering Management,Santa Clara University.California e Mine Safety and Health Act,24 Hour Course for Surface Metal Mines American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)*National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Professional Mechanical Engineer:Alaska Idaho,Nevada,California,Georgia Mr.Crea has seven years of mechanical engineering experience in a wide varicty of industrial,commercial,and institutional design projects.His experience includes extensive design work for energy-related industrial projects,as well as planning,budgeting,and implementation ofcapital investment and upgrade projects.He has specialized experience in the following areas: e Stress analysis and piping system design for process and geothermal resource piping,and mine dewatering piping e HVAC system design and specification for industrial and utility buildings e =Field engineering,construction inspection,and construction support Mr.Crea's project experience includes the following: O FMC Corporation,Phosphorous Chemicals Division,Pocatello,[tdaho Performed heat and cooling load analysis on a new substation building.resulting in the design and specification ofa 5-ton HVAC system. O Newmont Gold Company,Carlin,Nevada Designed heating system for the Truck Lube Bay Expansion,utilizing LP gas packayed heaters.The LP gas piping was designed per ANSI/NFPA 2223.1. 0 Sonora Mining Corporation,Columbia Water Supply Project,California Mechanical Engineer responsible for the design of the HVAC system for a puimpteese control room,resulting i the specification of a 6000 cfm I5-ton heat pump seit economizer,and ductwork O INEL Manufacturing Complex Fire Water and Potable Water Systems, Idaho Lead Design Enginece rcsponsible for the design and specification of a 2.000)25 water protection sysicit per NFPA 20.and a 500 gpm potable water supply sv '. AWWA Standards The fire water system consists of |.600'of underground duct. piping.and the potable water system consists of 1.600"of underground HD poi.- pipe.Both piping sxstems are served by centrifugal pumps and an evistin: gallon above-ground storie tink Mr Crea also provided construction tsi. conformance to design aid specifications. POWER /fi SHAWN W.CREA,P.E.2 -O Edwards Air Force Base Switch Station Building HVAC.California Mechanical Engineer responsible for HVAC design and specification for new switching station buildings being designed for Edwards Air Force Base.The switch stations were designed as part of a large design and study project involving electrical power supply and distribution system improvements for Edwards. O TG Soda Ash Heat Recovery Project,Green River,Wyoming Mechanical Engineer responsible for a study to determine whether air,steam or sonic soot-blowers would be most appropriate for finned-tube heat recovery economizers installed in a fly-ash airstream.Mr.Crea contacted soot-blower manufacturers, economizer manufacturers,and maintenance personnel in existing installations to aid in the evaluation.He also assisted in an evaluation to determine the most economical size for the heat recovery economizers. O Fire Extinquisher System and Solvent Pump Interface Mr.Crea was responsible for designing and specifying a fire protection system for the Arcata plant which involved an interface,using a solenoid valve,between the plant's CO2 system and the air lines to the plant's solvent pumps.When the fire extinguishers are triggered,the valve interrupts the air supply to the air-driven diaphragm pumps. O ALCATEL North America,Tarboro Manufacturing Cells,North Carolina Analyzed the exisung plant compressed air system,determining consumption rates and system capacity,and determining causes for condensate within the system from psychrometric conditions,system configuration and air dryer capacity,and gave options for improved system performance.Also analyzed the plant ventilation system and process flood and fill piping systems.Recommended changes for improvements in both. O Komorany 800MW Power Plant,Komorany,Czech Republic Project involved the retrofit of |of 10 80MW each boilers from a walking grate to a fluidized bed combustor to increase efficiency and reduce emissions.Evaluated bids for specification compliance and provided vendor comparisons for F.D.&1D fans, economizer,air heater.and baghouse.Mr.Crea also performed preliminary sizing tor the bed sand silos and sind conveyance piping,limestone storage bins and limestone conveyance piping,and the burner oil storage tanks,pumps,and piping. OF Newmont Gold Company,Gold Quarry Sump Dewatering System,Nevada Lead mechanical engineer tor the design and specification of a 3000 gpm pit sump dewatering pumping &piping system.Lncluded a barge mounted sump pump,250 HP skid mounted booster puinp.surge tank,500 HP booster pump,and approximately 7 +00 ft.of 12"HDPE and lo”CS)pipe CDIWER LARRY HINTON,P.E. POSITION:PROJECT GEOTECH/SITE DESIGN ENGINEER EDUCATION:M.S.,Agricultural Engineering,University of Wyoming B.S.,Agricultural Engineering,University of Idaho Cold Regions Engineering Short Course,University of Alaska Anchorage REGISTRATION:Professional Civil Engineer:Idaho,Nevada,Illinois,Montana,Oregon,Wyoming,Vermont, Alaska Nuclear Testing Equipment Certification 40 Hour OSHA Training for Hazardous Waste Sites 8 Hour OSHA Supervisors Training for Hazardous Waste Sites 24 Hour MSHA Safety Training EXPERIENCE:Mr.Hinton has more than 10 years of experience in geotechnical engineering analysis for the following: e Federal and State Agencies ¢Water User Organizations ¢Substation Facilities e Hazardous Waste Sites °Mine Sites ¢=Irrigation Districts He is particularly skilled in closed conduit,surface and groundwater analysis by analytical and numerical methods.His engineering and construction project experience includes work involving hydraulic machinery,closed conduit hydraulics,soil mechanics,dam evaluation, earthwork and earth structure evaluations,road design,and water resource analysis. His areas of particular expertise include: e Engineering of hydraulic machines e Surface and groundwater analysis by e Geotechnical investigation and analysis analytical and numerical methods of ponds,dam,and roads e Calculation and preparation of flood e Water quality sampling and analysis hydrographs e Construction inspection &management His representative project expenence includes the following: OO Project Manager,Barrick Goldstrike Mine Dewatering System and Hydro Plant Project,Carlin,Nevada Project Manager for design of 22.000 feet of 72"dewatering pipeline and associated intake and outflow structures for the Barrick Goldstrike Mine in Nevada.The project also involves a baffled cooling pond,energy dissipation structures and approximately 12,500°of cooling channei downstream from the pipeline.The carbon steel line ts engineered to handle 100 000 gpm of dewatering flow. O Geotechnical Engineer,Substations,Oregon Mr.Hinton performed yeotechmical investigation and analysis at the substation locations as part of the Third AC Intenie for General Electric/Bonneville Power Administration The project consisted of geotechnical exploration and analysis to support foundation design for bus suppons switch structures,breaker and control cabinets,and contre! buildings. C2IMER) {f LARRY HINTON,P.E.2 a) Geotechnical Engineer,Transmission Line,Oreqon Mr.Hinton performed geotechnical investigation and analysis of the new I15kV transmission line between Gold Beach and Hunter Creek for Coos-Curry Electric Cooperative,Inc.The project consisted of large excavated piers and soil anchors required to support structures on the weak residual soils common tn a coastal environment. Lead Civil Engineer,|[daho Power Spill Containment Evaluation Project, Idaho Provided hydraulic engineering for evaluation of spill containment measures in place and required for 12 Kaplan and Francis turbine plant sites.The evaluation was part of a program evaluating spill containment measures for 256 stauon and plant sites within Idaho Power's facility inventory Hydrological/Geotechnical Engineer,Mackay Dam Performed field investigation and engineering analyses to consider increasing reservoir and spillway capacities,overtopping analyses,and dam break analyses for the Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District.Project included evaluation of open channel and piping system for irngation use Hydrologic and Geotechnical Engineer,Gold Mine Performed the hydrologic and geotechnical investigations for a heap leach gold mine at Black Pine,Idaho.Project characteristics which were especially challenging were the design of high ore heaps on steep slopes in a high seismicity region and the siting, drilling and pump testing of 4 process water supply well in an arid,highly faulted,deep aquifer,geothermal environment Also prepared the soil and water portions of the mine permit application Hydrological/Geotechnical Engineer,Jordan Creek Drainage Evaluated one exisunyg nd one proposed flood control structure on the Jordan Creek drainage for the Corps ot t.suineers Walla Walla District.For the exisung Antelope Reservoir,evaluated increasing reservoir and spillway capacities,performed stability. overtopping and dam freak analyses,and studied economic feasibility of adding hydroelectric facilities 'psircan of the existing reservoir,evaluated the feasibility of installing a roller-comp.nicd oncrete dam. Geotechnical Engineer,Coal Mine Haul Road Closure Performed field investi:ca saalyses and permit document preparation for the closures of a haul road at the Bosc Stine Price,Utah,This project required the closure and site restoration of a haul eid 'hrouuh steep,mountainous terrain through talus piles ind Across Numerous sire.tiny CPOWER RICHARD H."CHIP"CARLSON,P.L.S. POSITION:PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR EDUCATION:University of Idaho College of Southern Idaho Boise State University REGISTRATION:Professional Land Surveyor:Idaho,Montana,Wisconsin AFFILIATIONS:-=National Association of Professional Surveyors =American Congress on Surveying and Mapping «Idaho Association of Land Surveyors EXPERIENCE:Mr.Carlson has more than 23 years of survey experience as a survey manager.chief surveyor,and land survey consultant to various companies in Idaho.California,Montana, Arizona,and Nevada.He has been responsible for surveying and management for approximately 2.500 land survey projects involving cadastral,control and construction surveying.He has performed and managed office and field work on more than 250 subdivisions varying in size from 5.000 acres to 10 acres.His areas of particular expertise include: e Fluencyin many COGO survey computation programs including PacSoft,CC-Sury,Hewlett-Packard,CoGo Plus,and CivilSoft e «Cadastral,control and construction surveying Preparation of calculations,descriptions,and survey maps Performance and management of office and field work for more than 250 subdivisions varying in size from 5,000 acres to 10 acres Mr.Carlson served for 10 years as Chief Surveyor for Newton and Schafer Engineers,PA . directing the company's surveying and mapping activities,and was Survey Manager for RLC Associates,of Manteca,California,and Project Surveyor for Cella-Barr Associates of Tucson and Phoenix,Arizona,and Manteca,California.From 1978 to 1986,Mr.Carlson was self- employed as the owner and manager of Accurate Surveys,which provided boundary surveys and other work for other companies.Mr.Carlson's survey project experience includes the following: |Newton &Schafer Engineers,P.A.,Idaho e Eijk Bend Subdivision 240 lots.1 Salmon,Idaho (surveying for all phases) e Deer Creek Subdivision.§.00 lots.in Salmon,Idaho (surveying for all phases) e Construction suney for the Twin Falls,Idaho,wastewater treatment plant e College of Southern Idaho.Twin Falls (surveying for various construction pliases) e Power line right-of-ways for Idaho Power e Boundary survey for the 4.500-acre San Felipe Ranch,in Mackay.Idaho.owned bs Hewlett-Packard e Boundary and construction surveys for lease and launch ramp used in Evel Kinesis rocket-car stunton the Suake Raver canyon near Twin Falls.Idaho e Construction and bonndan sumevs for 176-unit mobile home park near Ket bicn Idaho . e Preliminary ski ffi aheaments on Mount Baldy.Sun Valley,Idaho CDQWER RICHARD H."CHIP"CARLSON,P.L.S.2 O RLC Associates,California - ¢The Center,a 40-acre commercial development.Costco andjlome Club,Stockton, California ¢Patterson Estates Subdivision,260 lots,in Patterson.California e Hammer-West Subdivision,225 lots,in Stockton.California ¢The Blossom Valley Subdivision,200 lots,in Tracy.California ¢Quail Hollow Subdivisions,218 lots,in Galt,California e St.Joseph's Hospital Complex,Manteca,California e Crom Street Apartment Complex,18 buildings,Manteca,California Cella-Barr Associates,Arizona,California e Quail Hollow No.3 Subdivision,200 lots,in Galt,California e Fumasi Ranch Subdivision,306 lots,in Galt,California «Valley Glen Subdivision.119 lots,in River Bank.California e Willows Subdivision,40 acres,in Stockton,California e Chadwick Square Subdivision,725 lots,Manteca.California CH2M Hill Inc.Engineers,tdaho Preliminary proposal maps,boundary and aerial control for the Star Falls hydroelectric project on the Snake River Critser Land Surveys,Idaho Hydroelectric projects on a large irrigation canal system notes: the North Side Canal Company : Idaho Department of Highways,Boise,[Idaho Construction surveying for interstate highway construction in Idaho 'U.S.Army --Vietnam McCarter &Tuller Engineers,Boise,idaho 18 miles of S5O0kV power line near Astoria,Oregon.for the Bonneville Power Administration Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) A non-hazardous waste pipeline and secunty corridor at a chemical processing plant ut the Idaho National Engincering Laboratory OLOWER H.STEVE DEAL,A.I.A. POSITION:PROJECT ARCHITECT EDUCATION:Bachelor of Architecture.University of Idaho Graduate and MBA Coursework:Boston College,Pacific Lutheran University. Boise State University.University of Idaho REGISTRATION:Multi-State Registered Architect,Including Alaska National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB)Certificate Professional Member,Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) EXPERIENCE:Mr.Deal has more than 25 years of experience in the construction industry,with high-level responsibility in project and construction management and the management of long-term and multi-project facility development plans.Mr.Deal's project experience includes design and project management responsibilities for: Commercial and industrial buildings and public works projects Space planning and conceptual designs for industrial plants and campuses e =Fast-track industrial facility and plant addition design His project experience includes the following: O Potlatch,Las Vegas Converting Facility,North Las Vegas,Nevada Mr.Deal was the Lead Architect for architectural design and specification of a new 260,000 square foot tissue converting facility.The project involved fast-track design and construction of the converting complex and full project development services, including permitting and acquisition support and process development.The facility, located on a 20-acre site with rail access,will house operations for converting rail- shipped parent rolls of ssue into consumer products,and will also provide for product storage and shipment O ALCATEL Fiber Optic Plant Expansion,North Carolina Mr.Deal was the Lead Architect for the conceptual design of a new optical fiber manufacturing plant and an addition to an existing fiber optic cable manufacturing plant.Mr.Deal was instrumental in utilizing advanced architectural planning techniques to develop a spatial philosophy for the new plant that would complement ALCATEL's management and work team philosophy.The project also featured 3-D display,and design software is being used extensively to allow ALCATEL management to review design proposals and to help the engineers develop trouble-free general arrangements and site plans In designing this cable plant,Mr.Deal,with the POWER team reviewed the European process and manufacturing technology for fiber optic material and cable constniction The design team used this process information to determine how best to apply the most efficient production technology in ALCATEL's new U.S.plants,and to prepare conceptual designs for the plants in order to suppon optimum production [In addition to architectural services,Mr.Deal helped prepare electrical,mechanical,and civil conceptual designs for the two plants. O PacifiCorp,Jim Bridger Power Plant Buildings,Point of Rocks,Wyoming Lead Architect for the ial design of two buildings at the 1.200 MW Jim Bridger Power Plant:the plant's Qutside Resources Building.and the Warehouse/Olfice Building POWER prepared complete archutectural/engineering design and specification packaices ODIMER H.STEVE DEAL,A.I.A.2 O Pan Am World Services &United Airlines Services,Washinaton Division Manager responsible for the total profit/loss management of all construction, engineering and maintenance work performed by 150-person staff.Building types included commercial,industrial,medical,residential and recreational complexes. Administered construction program with annual budget of $20 to $40 million.Program included contract administration and project supervision. O Pan American World Airways,Washington Design Engineering Manager directed and managed all architectural and engineering work for a variety of government and corporate clients.Increased size of engineering group from 12 to 72 persons due to expanded work load.Established work policies and standards during start-up operation. O Architectural Dynamics,Idaho Construction Manager responsible for construction management and architectural services.Served as Project Manager and owner's agent for major high-rise office building.Coordinated work done by architects,engineers and contractors.Mr.Deal was project manager for the West One (Idaho First National Bank)high-rise office building in Boise.This involved all aspects of project management with heavy emphasis on scheduling,budget control,quality control and estimating. OO Taylor,Thon &Associates,Montana Architect/Constriction Manager responsible for supervising all phases of work done by this full-service firm.Served as Project Manager on several projects,many requiring fast-track construction techniques. O University of !daho,Idaho Architect/Planner performed all architectural tasks required for facility modification from initial client contact to completed project.Established budget and design criteria. O Cline,Smull,Hamill &Associates,Idaho Construction Manager/Architect conducted on-site construction supervision and coordination on projects for this firm. O State of Idaho,Division of Public Works,Idaho State Architect responsible for State of Idaho building construction program Administered state buildings maintenance program.Acted as liaison between the Division of Public Works and other state agencies. ODIWER) Vi.QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE A.STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS POWER has used the latest innovative design methods,coupled with practical knowledge resulting from years of experience,to complete more than 200 notably successful substation,switchstation and industrial power supply projects ranging from 2.4kV through S5OOkV. Our design services include: e Data Acquisition ¢Construction Specifications e Design Criteria «Material List e Alternative Analyses ¢Bidding Units e Design Calculations ¢Switchboards e Cable and Conduit ¢Project Design Manuals e Station Layout *Detailed Engineering e Structures ¢Geotechnical e Foundations e Surveying e Grounding «Protective Relaying e Site/Civil Work *SCADA e Equipment Specifications ¢Communications e Relay Settings In addition,POWER services re.atedi 'co substation engineering include cost estimating,site and access fui cesizn,oil spill containment designs, construction management and inspec'.on.testing and energization,audible noise Studies,system monitoring,and cevecloping station operation manuals and providing personnel training. CLQWER SUBSTATION DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Substation design was a key to POWER's original business success,and it remains one of POWER's primary specialty areas.Our designs and services can support any substation need:whether it is a new facility or an upgrade; simple breaker and transformer changeout;or the addition of distribution automation,SCADA or other communication devices.Throughout the industry,we are known as innovators who provide engineering services of exceptional quality. SYSTEM RELIABILITY Natural disasters are often the most stringent test of power system reliability. The POWER-designed Spar Canyon 230kV Switching Station was located only a few miles from the epicenter of an earthquake near Challis,Idaho.Despite the fact the quake measured 7.3 on the Richter Scale,electrical service was interrupted for only 60 seconds while station equipment automatically reset. Subsequent inspection revealed only minor damage -a number of bus fittings had broken.In our business,understanding quality is essential.In a POWER- designed substation,reliability has been considered at every level. INNOVATION POWER recently took part in design of one of the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS)projects for Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI)and Bonneville Power Administration,making a technological first with thyristor- controlled series capacitors (TCSC)at a 500kV station.The unique aspect of this project involves the use of intelligent valves that allow any of six groups of capacitors to be very quickly switched,thus optimizing real power flows.With the improved power flow,utilities can better use existing transmission lines, thereby eliminating or postponing the need for new transmission lines. TEAMWORK POWER projects are conducted by a team that engineers all phases of a project -from the owner's Notice to Proceed through completion.POWER substation P DOWER) Ran RR me et \AL.D engineering personnel are committed to our client's projects -even after detailed design is completed.Construction progress is constantly monitored to obtain the feedback necessary for confirmation or revision of designs. ADVANCED COMPUTER RESOURCES POWER operates an extensive networked CADD system consisting of Intergraph Interpro 2000 Series workstations,PC-based Intergraph Microstation and AutoCAD workstations.This equipment allows us to respond to virtually any client's CADD requirements for substation design. POWER's investment in automated design tools such as the powerful Intergraph software packages InSite/InRoads,EE Schematic,WPD and MICAS Plus provide us with the technological basis for our approach to substation projects. This package of software gives our engineers the ability to automate and optimize our substation designs from site preparation through final wiring.The design products are cost-effective and result in far fewer as-builts and field changes than occur with conventional design practices.This results in a lower project installed cost and savings for our clients. Substation engineering personnel also operate a network of micro-computers to use a host of programs written in-house to assist in the design of station components.For example,"Rigid Bus"assesses wind and ice loading,bus spacing,and fault current levels to ensure that bus expansion,deflection and strength are within appropriate design limits.In addition,"Cantilever Retaining Wall,""Cut and Fill"and "Foundation Analysis"are used to assess station design features. B.PROJECT EXPERIENCE Whether the need is for the planning,permitting,design,testing and energization,or construction management of substation facilities,POWER draws upon our wealth of experience to meet that need.We have successtulls completed projects throughout the United States in diverse climates and conditions -from Alaska to southern California,and from Hawaii to Vermont BLOWER/ POWER's experience includes conceptual design,design and specification of high voltage equipment,controls and protective relaying,buildings,system studies,communication and SCADA systems,as well as general yard design and construction management.This experience spans many years and includes stations ranging from 2.4kV to S500kV. This section illustrates the scope and depth of POWER's experience in providing consulting and design and related services for substation projects. COLD WEATHER EXPERIENCE POWER's personnel are experienced in the design of substations in cold climates and difficult terrain and conditions.Much of our cold weather design experience comes from designing substations in mountainous terrain in Idaho, Wyoming,and Northern Vermont.We have also completed several projects in the arctic regions of Alaska.Substations designed in the high reaches of the Rocky Mountains often have similar temperature design criteria as that used in the interior of Alaska.The difficulty of designing for extreme temperatures is compounded in mountains by difficult terrain,severe ice,snow,and wind loading.POWER will bring this experience and commitment to the proposed project team. Following is a partial list of POWER's cold weather projects.These projects are described in detail in the Project Briefs included at the end of this section. POWER) Client Cold Weather Project Location Chugach Electric Association Beluga 138-230kV Station Cook Inlet,Alaska MAPCO Petroleum,Inc.Main Plant 69-13.8kV Substation North Pole,Alaska Chugach Electric Association Transfer Tripping & Transient Recording System South Central Alaska Lower Valley Power &Light Valley 161x115-24.9kV Substation Eastern Idaho Salmon River Electric Cooperative Cyprus 69-24.9 kV Substation Central Idaho Salmon River Electric Cooperative South Butte 230-69kV Substation Central Idaho Bridger Valley Electric Association Granger 138kV Switching Station Southwestern Wyoming Alyeska Pipeline Service Company Terminal Power System Feasibility Study Valdez,Alaska U.S.Air Force Elmendorf Air Force Base Repair Electrical Distribution System Study Anchorage,Alaska Alaska Energy Authority Anchorage -Kenai' Transmission Intertie Feasibility Study |Kenai Peninsula,Alaska Alaska Energy Authority Northeastern Transmission Intertie Feasibility Study Northeastern Alaska. Citizens Utilities Company Northern Vermont Substation Expansion Vermont On the next page you will see a listing of our substation projects,shown as a detailed matrix that depicts the range of services we routinely provide on our substation projects. @ DOWER)NMUGINE ES POWER Engineers,Inc. Representative Station Experience Station Size Dates-Actual Work Performed or Estimated Month-Year Substation Name Owner and noonLocation(Thous.)Control HV |Control |&Relay }StationEng.|Const.In Concept.|Equip]Bidg.|Design }|Design |Comm J]Const.KV MVA Start]Start [|Service|Design |Spec.{Spec.|&Spec |&Spec.|System |Mamt. *e #*NSP Granite City-MN 115 N/A |1993]94-08 |May-95 NSP Willow River-WI 115 N/A |1993|94-04 |May-95 °°°° ESI Gerlach Substation-NV 120-13.8 25/39/42}1786 |1993|93-06 |Mar-95 .°,.°. NSP ;Sauk Rapids-MN 115 1,000 |1993]94-03 |Dec-94 °,.°.. LCPUD _'Glenoma Substation.WA _-----_-=«|2300-69-12.45/60/75|3,550_|1991 |93-03 |Nov-94 °°,°°° :**eo mi .'.eLCPUD__"Mossyrock Switchyard-WA ___230 230}900 |1991}93-03 |Nov-94 es a ae : SCPUD Della WA [5 __|2,000 |1992]94-05 |Oct-94 °,rn ° ;92 |4 _|; MEC Sixth StreetSubstation-OR_-----_-s«*(115-24.9 200 |1993]94-04 |Aug-94 °.." °° COE 'Schofield Barricks-HI 44-12.5 40;1,200 |1993|94-03 |Aug-94 °f en eeoo***.°**HECO lwitei-Hi 138-25 1201 10,000 |1992]93-11 |Jun-94 PSPL Bellis-WA 230-12.5 50|2,000 |1991]93-05 |Jun-94 Poude °° NSP Benton City-MN 115 na __|1993|94-03 |May-94 nei a Ge °. GE/TEK _|Turkish Elec.Auth.Capacitor-Turkey __|420kV 675MVAR|4,000 _|1993]94-03 |Feb-94 ae ee ° WREC Hadley-NV 24.9-4.16 6.25]200 |1993|93-09 |Dec-93 Syppe®,, ety ftWRECSchroderMountain-NV 120-13.8 20|1,500 |1992]93-09 |Dec-93 Rapp ue .°°,° .t "e **td *WREC Quarry Addition-NV 120-13.8 100]2,500 |1992]93-09 |Dec-93 an @utpooe .**°MEC _[Sunriver Substation-OR 115-24.9 400 1993 |93-08 {|Dec-93 ie Eecip -.;PSPL 'Dupont-WA 230-12.5 50]2,000 |1991|93-03 |Sep-93 . ]_*** NSP Kolman Lake Capacitors-MN 115kV 250 N/A 1991 |92-11 Jul-93 . BPAEPRI ic).Siatt Thyristor Controlled Series *.**°** __.__|eaps-or 500kV 200MVAR}15,000 |1992|92-06 |Jul-93 ** NSP Coon Creek Line Relaying-MN 345 e---|N/A 1992 |93-02 |May-93 POWER Engineers,Inc. Representative Station Experience Station Size Dates-Actual Work Performed _or Estimated*Month-Year Substation Name naa : Owner and costLocationes:(ous.)a Control Ww i .HV [|Control |&Relay |StationEng.|Const.In Concept.}Equip]Bldg.|Design |Design |Comm j Const.KV MVA Start]Start |Service |Design |Spec.|Spec.|&Spec {&Spec.{System |Mant. NSP |Kolmantake-MN {345-415 480,WA.|1901}92-11 |Maso}nT NSP |Redrock Sub Transformer Addition-MN___{115-13.8 46]WA |1992{92-10 |May-93 .,*"{|* MOBIL __{South Belridge,Bakersfield-CA 115-12.47 20 N/A 1991 |92-10 |May-93 ."UE SCPUD__|Halls Lake-WA 115 3,000 |1991|92-07 |May-93 .,.,-fon aNSP__!Prior Sub Grounding-MN 115-12.5 ---|N/A |1993}93-03 |Apr-93 °ne re . NSP RedrockSubCapacitors-MN 1145 250|N/A_|1991 |92-10 |Apr-93 ,a ne (ee . Cuc _Newport Substation-VT _}120-46KV 50|5,000 |1992|92-09|Apros|* ||*8 NSP_____.ChisagoSubLineRelaying-MN _345 =|NA |1992|92-12 |Fe9s}"|| NSP As King Sub Line RelayingMN {345 |wa [ig92|9212 |feos]"||Pd So****** BPA 8 Series Compensation Stations 500 3.7GVAR}30,000 |1990]91-01 |Jan-93 ° __ D.C.P.U.D Terry Sub Expansion,East Wenatchee-.°. WA 115-13.8 oe N/A 1992 |92-06 |Dec-92 ** Anaheim Fairmont Expanison Anaheim-CA 69-12.47 20|N/A 1991}92-02 |Jul-92 .* WAPA 4 Series Compensation Stations-OR 500 2.3GVAR]20,000 {|1991};91-01 {Jan-92 ,.. **®* TAU Chappice Lake-Alberta 138/24.9 25}1,000 |1991}91-08 |Nov-91 Shasta PUD |Shasta Exp.-CA _ 115-12.47 25|43 _|1990]91-01 |Jan-91 ,°°,° BC _[Boulder #4-NV 60-12.47 1012.5!700 |1990|90-01 |Jan-91 ,°°°-a PP&L __{Troudale-OR _. 230/115 150/200/250 95 1989 |90-01 Jan-90 - .*fo Pra.__|Cully-OR ; 115 ---|9 |1989|90-01 |Jan-90 °oe ***** CUC __Highgate Exp.-VT 44 ---|_g0__|1989|90-01 |Jan-90 '**** Echo Bay Echo Bay Additon-NV_115-24.9 25 N/A 1990 |}89-01 |Jan-90 ****** PSREC Metering-CA 69 o--60 1989 |89-01 |Jan-90 i POWER Engineers,Inc. Representative Station Experience Station Size Dates-Actual Work Performed or Estimated Month-Year Substation Name Owner and thoes)Location (Thous.Control HV |Control }&Relay |Station Eng.|Const.In Concept.|Equip]Bidg.|Design |Design |Comm ]Const KV MVA Start]Start |Service |Design |Spec.{Spec.|&Spec |&Spec.|System |Mqmt ******Echo Bay _{Echo Bay-Pit Substation-NV 249-5 5|250 1989 |89-01 |Jan-90 WREC Newmont Mill #2-NV 24.9-4.16 12.5|n/a |1988]88-01 |Jan-89 .°°,° **td *** RREC Ratt-Heglar Tap-ID 138 ----|N/A |1988|88-01 }|Jan-89 I ***e CRREC_|Heglar-ID _ 138-24.9 20/wa |1987]88-01 |Jan-89 {ff USAF-GEC |WCRS Substations-OR-115-125 |__-37.5|_5,000_|1987]98.01 |Jango |"|*°°°° USAF-MEC _WCRSSWSiations-OR m5 |st NA}1987]88-01 |Jano |”GT”.°.° Unv.olCA UC.Davis-CA i5-125 |80}700_|1987 |88-05 |Ores |FO)°° MMC Royal Mi.King Mill-CA |216-416 |10]1,260 |1988|88-01 |Janes |*|*|°°° WREC _'Quarry Bay Two-NV '|120-24.9 20 1,000 |1988]88-01 |Jan-88 "EL a ° WREC 'Newmont Plant 5-NV 120-4.16 20/wa |1968]88-01 |Jan-88 °°°.,°° WREC -_-|South Side Leach-NV 24.9-4.16 |10.251 w/a |1988]88-01 |Jan-88 es es ee -- EchoBay _[Echo Bay,Bays182-NV 120-4.16 _9.41 soo |1988 |88-01 |Jan-88 ., | *en es Z Echo Bay _.Echo Bay,Bays 3&4-NV _120-24.9 9.41 800 |1988{88-01 |Jan-88 °°°.- WREC _|Pilot-NV 69-12.5 12.5]N/A _|1988 |88-01 |Jan-88 °°. * WREC__-_[Shalte-NV 69-12.5 15|150 _|1987]88-01 |Jan-88 °°° OPD Logandale-NV 69-12.5 7.5|625 |1987|88-01 |Jan-88 ***** MMC Royal Mt.King Tap-CA 115-21 101 NA |1987|88-01 |Jan-88 . #*** WREC _{Quarry Expansion-NV 120-24.9 20;N/A 1988 |88-01 |Jan-88 * SREC_ ___-Sunbeam-ID 24.9-4.16 3]80 1986 |87-06 |Aug-87 ,°° WAPA -_Roseville-CA___230-60 250|_4,000_|1985|87-01 |Jun-87 ° OPD Water Dist.Substation-NV 69-4.16 150 1986 |86-12 |Mar-87 **** CEA Phase Il Beluga-AK 138-230 300}3,000 |1985]86-10 |Feb-87 POWER Engineers,Inc. Representative Station Experience Station Size Dates-Actual Work Performed or Estimated Month-Year Substation Name Owner and housLocationous.)Control HV [|Control]&Relay [|StationEng.{Const.In Concept.|Equip|Bldg.|Design |Design |Comm }Const.KV MVA Start!Start [Service|Design |Spec.]Spec.|&Spec |&Spec.|System |Mamt. WREC Quarry Modifications-NV 24.9 ---|WA |1987]87-01 |Jan-87 °. WREC Crusher-NV 24.9-4.16 101 WA |1987]87-01 |Jan-87 .°... ESPI UC Davis-CA 115-12.5 50|1,500 |1987]87-01 |Jan-87 . e ****?BC Boulder City-NV 69-12.5 20|590 |1985|86-06 |Sep-86 ee es es ee OPD -_-:Bunkerville-NV__[69-125 2|300 |1985]86-03 |May-86 "ff en ee oo PSREC --_Leavitt-CA (69-125 |625|185 |1985]86-03 |Mayes}"|fort . PSREC --_Quincy-CA 69-125 25,100 |1985]86-03 |May-86 mt °° PSREC CCC-CA 12.5-4.16 0.1;40 |1985;86-03 |Mayes|"|*|°°° 2S .;125-4 Wo.ON.40.|19851 86-03 |May-86||| JRS Co Gen 310010 _475131 |18.9]300 1985]85-11 |Dec-85|er ee ae WAPA _Folsom-CA 1230-115 120]4,000 |1983]85-03 |Dec-85 .i CEA |Beluga Phase |-AK 138-230 300|3,200 |1984|85-07 |Nov-85 ,.,,*|° WAPA Carr-CA 230 ---|950 |1984|85-05 |Sep-85 . WAPA Coyote-CA 115-4.16 125}2250 |1983 85-03 |Jul-85 . WREC/BPA |Quarry-NV 120-24.9 20|573 __|1984]85-03 |Jun-85 °°°,°°° WEST Parker-AZ 161-69 50]N/A |1984]84-09 |Mar-85 . WREC/SPCC 8-Mile Creek-NV ***«**. (BPA 120 ---|581 |1984|84-09 |Feb-85 oe ******* WREC/BPA |Cartin-NV 120-24.9 201 1,128 |1984|84-09 |Feb-85 [|aRECIBPA(Carlin-NV woe -- WREC Mill-NV 24.9-4.16 12.5}N/A |1984]84-10 |Jan-85 .,° ee ****** RREC/BPA 'GrouseCreek-UT 138-24.9 12.5}375 |1983]84-08 |Jan-85 ****** WREC/BPA 'Tecoma-NV 138 ---|270 |1983|84-08 |Dec-84 * * WEST Spook Hill-AZ 1230-69 30/40 1984 |84-06 |Dec-84 POWER Engineers,Inc. Representative Station Experience Station Size Dates-Actual Work Performed or Estimated .Month-Year Substation Name COSTOwnerand(Thous.)Location .Control HV [|Control}&Relay |StationEng.|Const.in Concept.|Equip]B8idg.|Design |Design |Comm |Const. KV MVA Start]Start |Service |Desiqn |Spec.{Spec.|&Spec |&Spec.{|System |Mgmt. FMC {Skull Poin-WY __|138-24 7.5|351 _|1984]84-10 |Nov-e4|=”on ae *|*. BPC Pigeon Cove-ID 4.16-46 22|151 |1983]84-07 |Sep-a4 ,..°. MAPCO _|Main Plant-AK 69-13.8 25]1,800 |1983|84-05 |Sep-84 ,..°°,° MON 'Monganto-ID 132-46 |100 |1983]84-05 |Sep-84 ,.°°.MON ___'Monsanto-I0 132-46 |4 jo a ee SREC'GPA Round Vailey10 230-69 100,ga7__|1982]83:05|Sepea}*||"':,. '****** ages @°9 3 1,100 ;1983 -84-03 ;Aug-84 ne -|'' ;'*.|.ua eo #8 2 e ec ls mas 20 1370 1982 BT Jud [7 a . '''*"oe *C3 !°Te 've nee os mes SIS 1YBS B4-03 |Jun-B4 - ; , e °*"*ua ro bree cue Psa wt Pyke SI4 3 iv 7.5 650 1983!84-03 Jun-84 |!|\ ._75;650 +1983}84-03 |Jun-84 |we eee en BPC Cudat UiawiD 41688 |2.2)87 |1983|84.03|Mays|ne SREC -'SquawCreeki0 «dG 144}390 |1983}83-05 |Sep-e3 |”|°oe eel ees te SREC/BPA {Spar Canyon-I0 7 __ {230 ----|1,931 |1982]83-03 |Jun-83 °,"|*.'4 SREC/CTCM|S.Butte-ID 230-69 100/1,866 |1981|62-07 |Jun-83 ...,**. LREC/BPA iLostRiverID __[230-69 ----|N/A __|1982]83-03 |May-83 °° ;. T *°***|* SREC -_-'Cyprus-I0__69-249 100]1,200 _|1982]82-09 |Jan-83 _ees ee BVEA -_'Grange-WY Lk ee --}425 |1979}82-09 |Jan-83 °°ae,. RREC 'Kellon-UT 138-249 9.4]377 1981 |82-05 |Dec-82 ***** --FP meme rr ern -wo fe te ete se a at an ee LVPL 'Valley:-WY 1161x115-24.9 20 690_|1981 |82.06 |Nov-82 °°.mp . .t --t-f--nn anand ------oo - ' -oe aie RREC Cuttow-UT 138-24 9 ; 25|175 |1981|82-05 |Nov-82 .°so --,i!ce 25)175 |(1984 5 a ee 4 7 REEC Caster Creer UT 438 '_se{94|1981 |82-05 |Nov-82 "|-en.r r eo:«*;«{*vy "a _out Pay 138ab9-12 5 20'558 1981 |82-05 |Aug-82 ||;- ; ;oT rn i ry '°-* . * o 15125 25)40 1980 =81-02 Feb-82 ' POWER Engineers,Inc. Representative Station Experience Station Size Dates-Actual Work Performed or Estimated Month-Year Substation Name costOwnerand(Thous.)Location .Control . HV |Control |&Relay |StationEng.|Const.tn Concept.|Equip]Bidg.|Design |Design |Comm |ConstKVMVAStart]Start_]Service |Design |Spec.{Spec.|&Spec |&Spec.|System |Mamt BVEA Sweetwater-WY 230-138x69 41|1,100 |1979]81-09 |Jan-82 ...... FFREC Drummond-IO 115-46 50/600.|1978|79-03 |Sep-79 .. ; .*.. PP&L Knott-OR 115 ----|40 |1989|90-01 |1990 .. PP&L {Harison-OR 115 --|22 |1989]90-01 |1990 °. NSP 'London Substation-Wi 69-138 |___-20|_ -sNvA_|1993|94-02 .°°°. NSP Patk Falis-WI 69-345 ||mt A 192 |94-02 ,..* NSP (North Fork Substation-W1 :34.5-13.8 att wa |i993f 9912 fo ff °ne CBC ,Substation#4 Boulder City-NV___{69-12.47 __.__20}_600_|1993]93-06 . IPCO ,Misc.Stations-Oil Containment ;N/A 1992 |93-05 ° COE _!EAFBNo.2,17,19 &20-CA 34.5-12.47 ----|N/A}1990]92-01 .,,,, [ *****°e a *CCL Industrial-CA 60-12 60]850.|1990}90-01 Santa Clara_|Scott-CA 115 ----|30 |1989|90-01 . KPU Ketchikan-AK 34.5-12.47 20/100 |1969]90-01 ,,.,. *LCPO #1 __-_|Prince Ill Upgrade-WA 22 ---|N/A |1989]90-01 .,, COE EAFB #1,2,4-CA 34.5 ---|WA |1989]90-01 '.,°. | *BPA Burnt Woods-OR 27 sore 7 1991 * BPA Raver-WA 500 ---|35 1990 . .° BFA Lower Monumental-OR {$00 be one 50 1990 a _.' BPA Lower Granite-OR 500 ---|21 |1990 °a BPA Raver Breaker Changeout-WA 500 eae 33 1990 _| .* o3e Br ispes NV 120-69 nn 25,WA 1987|ee es nn re bo ud 51 nya!1987 | Page 6 CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION SWITCHING STATION -BELUGA STATION Cook Inlet,Alaska CLIENT Chugach Electric Association (CEA) CLIENT'S NEED Design and construct a facility to provide voltage transformation,metering,line protection and switching as part of a major project to convert CEA''s 138kV transmission system to 230kV. DESIGN SERVICES Access Road Lightning Shielding Steel Structures Equipment Specifications Station Layout Insulation Coordination _Foundations Protection Coordination Oil Spill Relaying &Control Containment Metering Cable &Conduit SCADA System Interface Grounding System Monitoring Station Service Construction Drawings Station Lightingeeee°cfeee°eeeeeeeeeDESIGN FEATURES" «Three-breaker ring bus convertible to breaker-and-a-half -Extensive site preparation -Zone 4 seismic area Special foundation design Oil Spill containment system Design interface with existing facility SCADA system interface Station annunciator with local and remote alarms MAJOR EQUIPMENT e«3-phase,138-230kV,180/240/300-MVA autotransformer (existing) «3-phase,230kV,2000-amp oil circuit breakers e 3-pole,230kV,1200-amp motor-operated airbreak switches «3-pole,230kV,1200-amp manual-operated air-break switches «230kV capacitor voltage transformers PROJECT DESCRIPTION Chugach Electric Association,Alaska's largest utility,selected POWER Engineers to design a new switching-substation facility at its Beluga Generating Plant.The Beluga 230kV Station provides voltage transformation,metering,tine protection and switching for existing and future 23C*'/ transmission from the gas-fired genera:rj plant to expanding load centers 40 mr +s away in the Anchorage area. The project was designed and constr..°:3 in two phases.Phase |consisted cf °" design of a three-breaker ring bus sc. to provide protection and switching '-' existing 138-230kV,AUD.4 autotransformer,a 230kV line and a ° line to be converted to 230kV. Phase Il design involved the addition of a second 230kV,300-MVA autotransformer bay and three more circuit breakers to convert the station to a breaker-and-a-half scheme.Design provision was also made for addition of a future 230kV line terminal. Severe space constraints in the heavily forested project area dictated siting of the 380'x 270°station addition on an active streambed.This constraint,as well as the station's location in the subarctic zone in a Zone 4 seismic area,required that extensive geotechnical investigation be conducted and elaborate site preparation be performed during Phase |,including stripping of the overburden and use of non-frost-susceptible fill material.In addition,two 60"x 46"flat-bottomed galvanized steel culverts were specified to channel!the stream under the north end of the yard and a French drain system was designed to lower the water table.A 10-foot step was incorporated in the station grade to minimize the amount of fill required. The high water table at the site and susceptibility to frost heaving necessitated special foundation considerations. Shallow-bottomed spread footings weredesignedtoavoidhighwater-table problems,while buried styrofoam insulating board was specified to prevent frost penetration.To protect the nearby stream from accidental oil contamination,POWER designed a_sophisticated oil -spill containment system that features concrete-walled catch basins with impermeable membrane liners and imbiber bead drains around all oil containing equipment. Electrical design for Phase |of the Beluga 230kV Station was complex.It involved extensive relaying and control interface with existing station facilities to provide integrated protection coordination.The state-of-the-art protection scheme designed by POWER utilizes differential and sudden pressure protective relaying for the transformer,bus differential,breaker failure relaying for each circuit breaker,and distance relaying for the lines. Design interface was also required for the Station's new microwave-operated SCADA system.POWER was responsible for placement of the remote terminal unit in the control house and schematic wiring.Other electrical design tasks included a control house annunciator with both local and remote alarms. Structurally,the new station was designed to withstand Zone 4 seismic loads and features tubular steel station structures designed for both strength and aesthetics. Over 300,000 Ibs.of steel was required for the sturdy,yet architecturally streamlined, structures. Additional POWER responsibilities on the estimated $5.8 million project included design of the line reroutes necessary for proper Station-line interface,survey supervision and limited contract administration,and construction monitoring services. PROJECT COMPLETION: Phase |-November 1985 Phase Il -October 1986 PROJECT COST: Phase |-$3.2 million Phase Il -$2.6 million MAPCO MAIN PLANT 69-13.8KV SUBSTATION NORTH POLE,ALASKA CLIENT MAPCO Petroleum,Inc. CLIENT'S NEED .. Provide,on a compressed schedule,an upgraded power supply for existing and new facilities comprising a $60 million expansion of MAPCO's North Pole Refinery near Fairbanks,Alaska.-_- : DESIGN SERVICES Station Layout Site Preparation Steel Structures Foundations Oil Spill Containment Cable &Conduit Grounding Control Building Station Service Station Lighting DESIGN FEATURES Foundation design for frost heaving Oil spill containment system Extreme-temperature provisions Protective schemes for reverse power flow VAR fluctuation control SCADA system interface Compressed design-construction schedule Lightning Shielding Equipment Specifications Insulation Coordination Protection Coordination Relaying &Control Metering SCADA System Interface Design Manual Preparation Construction Drawings Testing &Energization MAJOR EQUIPMENT m Dual 3-phase,69-13.8/8kV,10/12.5-MVA power transformers with LTC 3-phase,69kV,1200-amp SF,gas circuit breakers 69kV,1200-amp group-operated airbreak switches 69kV,600-amp group-operated airbreak switches 13.8kV capacitor banks 13.8kV metal-clad switchgear PROJECT DESCRIPTION The MAPCO Main Piant Substation was designed by _POWER Engineers as part of a $60 million project to expand MAPCO's North Pole Oil Refinery near Fairbanks to process asphalt and sulpholane.and increase crude oil processing capacity.The new dual-transformer, 25-MVA station supplies power to all refinery facilities via six underground feeders,with design provision for two additional feeders.Its main-with-bypass bus scheme allows for isolation of the power circuit breakers for maintenance,or total station bypass if required. Design of the facility,located in Alaska's subarctic zone, presented several engineering challenges.The most significant of these involved site preparation.Sited out of necessity on an old riverbed with a shallow water table, the station would have been extremely susceptible to_”frost heaving'during:thé:frigid Alaskan winters.Toeliminatethispotentiallyseriousproblem,POWER civil engineering personnel specified excavation of the entire substation site,placement of a special fabric lining under foundations,and backfill with non-frost-susceptible fill material.In addition,special spread-footing foundations with frost barriers were designed to neutralize the site's eKaef 2 wt &IY.errs esGI": eT mont ane --=TL.ISi76"ee zy #ora te ."'Ne ran eee iv |"ate serous»nae NL RInI TE ae -=ee nner te wesa7=3]SSEeymeereneewweone 0 ott @)er:*ah,aR rn eeTeesrooeennenespre-Eee 2 wsttepeel° fETat TT - ;RAL phe "po be ab ap -2 nee Qe 4 wee "NORTH POLE REFININGwen.|North Pole.Aleske"eam en?jes TEDonteryCmirnansSlOresOarERD, Pace tte Owen seca 8SsiOkbuhaMina high water table and severe winter freezing problems.Due to its proximity to the existing river,the new facility also required an oil spill containment pit around each of the transformers. The subarctic climate imposed other special design considerations.Winter temperatures in the -40°F to -70°F range required specification of two oil heaters per transformer,extra equipment insulation and placement of the 13.8kV metal-clad switchgear inside the station's super-insulated control building. Interface with other plant electrical systems provided additional engineering challenges.Special relaying arrangements were designed to protect the station and utility supply against reverse power flow from in-plant generation,while two capacitor banks were specified to control VAR-induced voltage fluctuations on the feeders caused by the plant generation. Complex design interface was also required with the local utility's SCADA system and the main plant Foxboro Spec- trum Coordinated Control System.POWER coordinated its design effort closely with the local utility,MAPCO and the other electrical contractors on the project to ensure proper systems interface. Additional POWER responsibilities with regard to the main plant substation included design of the 69kV transmission source loop,materia!procurement, construction inspection,and testing and ener- gization.Designed and constructed on a fast-track schedule,the modern facility was energized on time. PROJECT COMPLETION:September 1984 PROJECT COST:$1.8 million a DOMES - CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION TRANSFER TRIPPING &TRANSIENT RECORDING SYSTEM SOUTH CENTRAL ALASKA CLIENT Chugach Electric Association Fairbanks,Alaska CLIENT'S NEED Chugach required engineering services for tre design and installation of a transfer tripping and transient recording system to serve its transmission and distribution facilities in Soutn Central Alaska. GP -Project Brief DESIGN SERVICES @ Conceptual Design ©Plan,Conduit,and @ Field investigations Grounding Diagrams ®Design Review @ OC Schematics @ Equipment Review ©Wiring Diagrams ®One-Line Diagrams ©installation Specs @ Three-Line Diagrams ©®Construction Support DESIGN FEATURES §Expansion of station facilities §Single channel design f Microprocessor-based relays {Microwave system integration §Timing control using satellites PROJECT DESCRIPTION Following a study submitted to Chugach Electric Association,the need for a transfer tripping system was identified.POWER Engineers provided the needed engineering services to design and install this system for Chugach. The system protects Chugach's facilities in southcentral Alaska.These facilities include 10 stations and interconnecting 230kV,138k,and 115kV transmission lines.Many of Chugach's stations employ Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories (SEL)121 and 121G microprocessor- based relays. POWER enhanced the fault report..g capabilities of these relays by designing a s.rgie channel that triggers each station's SEL relays This action occurs at the time of any transfer *"0 action at any station in the Chugach system To house the new transfer tripping equiomen' two stations required expansion of their contro: ouildings.POWER provided designs to exoard these buildings. CRIWER The installation of the transfer tripping scheme required communication of tripping tones, report initiation tones,and accurate timing signals.POWER designed a communication system that integrates with the existing Chugach microwave system providing the necessary tones and timing signals.The tone circuits incorporate both wire circuits and fiber optic circuits.Tone transmission time is critical for the transfer tripping and report initiation scheme.The design incorporates techniques for minimizing transmission time. Accurate timing for the transfer tripping scheme incorporates GOES satellite receivers in the system.These satellite receivers provide IRIG-B timing information,which is accurate to within one millisecond. For this project,POWER provided the conceptual design,equipment specifications,installation specifications and construction inspection. PROJECT COMPLETION:October 1988 PROJECT COST:$340,000 onus BPA,EPRI,&GE SOOKV THYRISTOR-CONTROLLED SERIES CAPACITOR (TCSC)BANK ARLINGTON,OREGON 'a -. re . --Bs ,a TA TAO -_a |_-_ ;;;| ae - -Te-2 9 ; 77 97 i - oe | ° | sth | i.ark ". . +a.Lame .;.fo eo -2 . 2 .f : sole "|a 2"SE !1-il _=3 oo i -.oc. Cet . bee: aa nore -a : :pote Sa _-i;*Bes:; _ CLIENTS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) General Electric Company (GE) CLIENT'S NEED Provide design and construction management ser- vices for the instailation of a 500kV Thyristor-Con- trolled Series Capacitor Bank as part of the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS)project at BPA's Slatt Substation. DESIGN SERVICES @ Conceptual Design §@ Foundation Design @ Geotech Investigation @ Yard Layout @ Surveying @ Contractor Selection @ Site Design @ Bid Evaluation @ Structural &Electrical @ Building Design Platform Design @ Valve Cooling Piping Project Brief -Substation @ Equipment Specs @ Shop Drawing Review @ Receiving ®@ Grounding &Raceway . @ Progress Payments @ Site Safety @ Const.Mgmt.Proced.@ Pre-bid &Pre-con @ Expediting Support @ Const.Support @ Progress Reports @ Const.inspection @ Quality Control PROJECT DESCRIPTION In a joint effort with GE,BPA and EPRI,POWER is taking part in one of the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS)Projects,making a technolegical first with high ampacity thynstor-controlled seres capacitors (TCSC)at a 500kV BPA substatcn The unique aspect of this project invalves the use cfhign speed electronic valves that allow any of six grcucs of capacitors to be switched thus optimiz rg "eal power flow and providing enhanced system s'ateity The selected site for the demonstration project is BPA's Siatt Substation,located approximately two miles north of Anington,Oregon.The TCSC is installed on the 50Q0kV Slatt-Buckley transmission line. The existing yard has been extended to accommo:° date a new A-frame structure,required bus sup- ports,500kV insulated equipment platform,new control building and the TCSC cooling system.GE contracted POWER to provide design and construc- tion management services required for the project. The overall project consists of the 500kV TCSC bank,transmission line retermination,500kV yard extension,piping and cable raceway systems,TCSC contro!building,valve cooling system,associated control system and associated station service up- grades. S00kV TCSC Bank POWER conducted analyses and all design for the TCSC bank,which involves detailed platforms.The TCSC bank consists of three insulated aluminum platforms (one per phase).The platforms are sup- ported by reinforced concrete foundations,porcelain post-type insulators,and polymer-type strain insula- tors.The porcelain insulators are configured in a vertical onentation and the polymer insulators in a diagonal orientation to support the platform. For each platform,the aluminum supporting struc- tures require 16 porcelain (four stack)units and 32 polymer types.In addition to supporting insulators, valve cooling on each platform requires six insulated (porcelain-type)insulators to supply the coolant. Each platform has four polymer-type fiber optic columns to facilitate the routing ofthe fiber from optic cabling on the platform to the control building. Platform equipment consists of metal-enciosed thy- ristor valves,varistors,capacitor racks and capac- tors,reactors,insulators,current transformers,and platform interface cubicles in addition to miscella- neous piping,cabling and bus work. 500kV Yard Extension The existing yard is extended to accommodate the new bus work and associated TCSC bank.POWER designed and oversaw the grading,grounding,and reinforced concrete foundations.POWER also spea- fied,procured and oversaw installation of the galva- Project Brief -Substation nized steel structures,insulators,Dus cus "tins lighting,lightning protection,fencing,SO0kV sing:2 pole disconnect switches,5O0kV bypass power c:r- cuit breakers,SOOkV CCVT's,SOOKV rod gaps anc surfacing. Piping and Cable Raceway POWER designed extensive trench systems to ac- commodate the valve cooling piping andthe control' fiber optic trench system,using both cast-in-place and precasttrenches.The trench system emanates from the TCSC control building to the platform and disconnect switch area,to the heat exchangers,and to the existing BPA trench system.Cast-in-piace trenches were also designed for the new control building. Valve Cooling System An integral part of this project is the valve cooling system.The cooling system is required to dissipate the high current switching energy generated with the electronic valves.The system involves a GE-fur- nished motor control center,pump skid,six heat exchangers,stainless steelandABS-typepicre.m..- folds,as well as valves and elbows. Contro!System POWER assisted BPA and GE in the design of the indoor contro!cubicles that comprise the contrsl system for the TCSC.This involved associated isolating and bypass equipment and 6&PA interface requirements. This first-of-its kind station could change the ap- proach utilities take in expanding their systems. With the improved power flow and enhanced system stability enjoyed from this technology,utilities can better use existing transmission lines,thereby elimi- nating or postponing the need for new lines.While these types of new stations will be expensive,they are substantially less expensive than building new transmission lines.The FACTS team anticipates that utilities will experience a rapid payback with this new type of station. PROJECT COMPLETION:September '993 PROJECT COST:$10 mi acercx ) VALLEY 161x115-24.9KV SUBSTATION EASTERN IDAHO CLIENT Lower Valley Power and Light,Inc.(LVP&L) CLIENT'S NEED Construct a 24.9/14.4kV substation facility to serve min- ing loads in excess of 10 MW at a new phosphate mine located in mountainous eastern Idaho. DESIGN SERVICES Site Selection Station Layout Site Preparation | Steel Structures Foundations Oil Spill Containment Cable &Conduit.. Grounding : Control Building- DESIGN FEATURES -- Siting constraints” High altitude-extreme climate design © Oil spill containment Revenue-class metering Four-feeder provision Loop feed capability Station Service Lightning Shielding Equipment Specifications Protection Coordination Insulation Coordination Relaying &Control Metering .. Construction Drawings A!MAJOR EQUIPMENT @ 3-phase,110-24.9/14.4kV,12/16/20-MVA power transformer m 3-phase,161kV,1200-amp circuit switcher m 1-phase,24.9/14.4kV,463-amp,667-KVA voltage regulators : m 24.9kV,560-amp vacuum circuit reclosers @ 161kV,600-amp group-operated airbreak switches PROJECT DESCRIPTION As part of its design responsibilities on a project to sucply power to the J.R.Simplot Company's new crer pit Smoky Canyon Phosphate Mine in eastern 'caro. POWER Engineers designed the Valley 161x115-24 3«v Substation located at the mine site.The loop-fed station supplies 24.9/14.4kV to the slurry pumping station. excavation shovels and drills,and the mill via 'rree underground feeders,with provision for a fourth 'eecer The remote mine-site facility proved to be one of the more challenging POWER station design projects.Lack of available flat space at the mine necessitated evaluation of several siting alternatives.Excavation of a narrow bench near the mill site was ultimately required to provide a suitable site.To minimize station space requirements, POWER design personnel placed the line tap parallel to the station bus,a very compact physical configuration. High altitude and severe winter conditions called for additional special design considerations.Insulation coordination calculations specified use of 230kV insula- tion on the high side of the substation to minimize increased flashover potential at the 7500-foot elevation, while transformer specifications were prepared for winter temperatures as low as -65°F.Aiso,a 10-foot-high station fence with Dutch gate was installed due to nistorically deep winter snowpack and extensive snowdritting in the project area. erDOUel) Other design features included an oil spill containment ditch and revenue-class metering.The mine's location in an environmentally sensitive national forest required provision be made for oil spillage;while revenue-class metering was installed on the dedicated feeders to provide LVP&L with accurate readings for billing purposes.Designed for eventual conversion to 161kV,the Valley Substation was initially energized at 115kvV. Additional project services provided by POWER included system studies,preliminary engineering,survey, transmission line design and construction management. PROJECT COMPLETION:November 1982 PROJECT COST:$690,000. CLM CLIENT Salmon River Electric Cooperative (SREC) CLIENT'S NEED Provide reliable 24.9/14.4kV distribution voltage for all electrical facilities required at a new molybdenum mine located within SREC's service territory. DESIGN SERVICES Station Layout Site Preparation Steel Structures Foundations Oi!Spill Containment Cable &Conduit Grounding Control Building Station Service DESIGN FEATURES w Dual single-bus with bypass for dual or backup transformer operation Space constraints High altitude-contamination design Extreme-weather provisions Extensive metering Oil spill containment system Design interface with adjacent distribution facility Station Lighting Lightning Shielding Equipment Specifications insulation Coordination Protection Coordination Relaying &Control Metering Construction Drawings Testing &Energization MAJOR EQUIPMENT Dual 3-phase,69-24.9/14.4kV,30/40/50-MVA power transformers with LTC 3-phase,69kV,1200-amp circuit switchers 3-phase,24.9kV,1200-amp oil circuit breakers 115kV,1200-amp group-operated airbreak switches 115kV,600-amp group-operated airbreak switches PROJECT DESCRIPTION Located near the concentrator building at the Cyprus Thompson Creek Molybdenum Mine in mountainous central Idaho,the Cyprus 69-24.9kV Substation supplies power to all mine facilities including the pit-area crusher, concentrator,mile-long conveyor,power shovels and ancillary facilities.The dual-transformer,100-MVA station features a dual single-bus scheme with bypass which allows for single (normal mode),dual or backup transformer operation modes.It was designed by Ne CYPRUS 69-24.9KV SUBSTATION CENTRAL IDAHO POWER Engineers as one of its overall engineering responsibilities on a major power supply project to provide reliable power to the new mine and at the same time upgrade Salmon River's system. Sited by the client in a constricted area of the mine at an elevation of over 7500 feet,the Cyprus Substation required several special design considerations.The relatively smal!(125°x 200')area allocated for the sub- Station dictated minimum separation of certain station components,as well as closely spaced station fayout.Dust contamination and the high altitude necessitated specification of a higher basic insulation level (BIL)than the station's operating voitage in order to offset the increased flashover potential created by these conditions. To minimize the effect of extreme winter temperatures to -60°F,extra insulation for station equipmert ard the control building was specified,while average winter snow accumulations of several feet at the site required 'rat the bus height be raised and an extra-high stat:on fence installed for safety purposes. Other special engineering requirements for th2 -2w mine substation included an extensive metering s..°2m.oil spill containment and design interface with °*==2 1:acent underground feeder facility.The sophisticates --aring system,designed by POWER to allow fC to accurately record demand and power . 1;: si the station,includes JEM meters for KW.Kvv4 :2+Ala KW printing demand meter,KW demand:=sand a totalizer. DOWEL) Ree a 1981989os| 3 \F3°§ 32i:i!a := |}F3ifs4alHoa3 Environmental concerns of the Forest Service,on whose land the mine is located,dictated design of an elaborate og,eae ae ae oil spill containment system complete with multi-layer |filter and drain.Finally,design coordination was required ores nog with the contractor responsible for design of the |underground distribution feeder portion of the station to ensure proper interface. PUOGRADELEVPOMS ELEY.1999.0-». serrata sh GONTANGAEMT DIP In addition to design of the station and its source tap, (emer 90%POWER performed the initial system studies which en a aaa identified this facility as one of the components of the rT we new power supply system.Other responsibilities includedAuyhs;;complete construction management through station[|'B Foe Satan zea |EE testing and energization and project closeout. °F ussatmomines ||FRC =[BA |PROJECT COMPLETION:June 1983 H]Oe oR Re enall PROJECT COST:$1.2 million no ier bys neve 2».=be4 SOUTH BUTTE 230-69KV SUBSTATION CENTRAL IDAHO Wg-ryCLIENT Salmon River Electric Cooperative (SREC) CLIENT'S NEED Provide a reliable power source with sufficient capacity to serve Cyprus Mines Corporation's new molybdenum mine in remote central Idaho,as well as a new Salmon River Electric Cooperative distribution substation. DESIGN SERVICES Site Selection e Access Road e Station Layout e Site Preparation e Steel Structures e Foundations e Oil Spill Containment ® Cable &Conduit e Station Service Station Lighting Lightning Shielding Equipment Specifications Insulation Coordination Protection Coordination Relaying &Control Metering @ Grounding ®Construction Drawings @ Control Building @ Testing &Energization DESIGN FEATURES Multiple-entity design interface Extensive site preparation Oil spill containment system Environmental-visual impact mitigation Architecturally designed steel structures High aititude-severe weather design Cost-saving equipment selection Totalized metering Compressed design-construction schedule MAJOR EQUIPMENT w Oual 3-phase,230-69kV,30/40/50-MVA autotransformers @ 3-phase,230kV,1600-amp circuit switchers PD) m 3-phase,69kV,1200-amp oil circuit breakers m 230kV,1200-amp group-operated airbreak | switches m 69kV,1200-amp group-operated airbreak switches mw 230kV tubular steel A-frame structure mw 69kV tubular steel A-frame structures PROJECT DESCRIPTION © South Butte 230-69kV Substation was designed by POWER Engineers as part of its overall design respon- sibility on a major electrical power supply project in central idaho prompted by the construction of a new molybdenum mine.The dual-transformer,two-feeder station was designed to serve two primary loads:1)the Cyprus Thompson Creek Molybdenum Mine through a new 69-24.9kV distribution substation at the mine site; and 2)the western portion of SREC's service territory via its new 69-24.9kV distribution substation at Squaw Creek. Financed by Cyprus,South Butte Substation is currently operated by SREC. The $1.9 million facility required design interface with several entities.As the joint owners of the project, Cyprus and Salmon River supplied key input data and retained final review and approval authority.Bonneville Power Administration,as the power supplier,provided in- put to the station's totalized metering design.The Bureau of Land Management,on whose land the station is sited,was actively involved in the site selection process and also requested that certain visual impact mitigation measures such as berms and revegetation be incorporated into the design plan. Aesthetics were of primary importance in POWER's design of this modern facility located adjacent to the scenic Challis National Forest.Every attempt was made to mitigate the visual impact of the station on its moun- tain surroundings.A low-profile rigid bus scheme was utilized to streamline its appearance and reduce visibility. Slender field-welded and gusseted tubular steel station structures with battered legs were custom designed to give the station a sleek,non-angular look.Spacious physical layout and selection of a structure paint that blends with the surrounding mountains were further design measures to minimize the station's visibility and enhance its aesthetic appearance. Electrical design of the 100-MVA substation features a redundant autotransformer scheme to ensure a reliable power supply for the mine.One autotransformer normally supplies both feeders while the other transformer serves as a backup.Autotransformers were specified for thei considerable cost savings over multiple-winding transformers.Additional cost savings were realized by specifying circuit switchers for high-side transformer protection in lieu of more costly circuit breakers. Ne Sited at 5700 feet in mountainous terrain with severe winter conditions,the South Butte Substation also required high-altitude and extreme-weather design measures.Average winter snow depths of several feet necessitated raising the bus height to maintain safety clearances,while electrical spacings and clearances were increased to compensate for the reduced atmospheric insulation at that altitude. Further design features included extensive site pre- paration and an elaborate oil spill containment system.Space constraints dictated siting of the substation in an old streambed adjacent to the existing stream.To prevent the possibility of flooding,the entire site was raised with fill material and drainage was employed.An extensive oil spill containment system was incorporated to prevent oil from polluting the nearby stream in the event of leakage.The sophisticated system features a three-layer filter drain composed of sand, polyurethane foam and oil imbiber beads that permit water to pass through while trapping oil. arisar +SE Tames mea. PO.TURE FOaas 172°PEN CE tehORES5-2 Fw be massaetimoisTecnO56420FaeSa}-MOIOER BEADS 6°LATER (COW Crtmncaa 30 +108 2cOmeCMETEry_OETAIL C=?OfL_CONTAINMENT DRAIN DETAIL, Besides design of the station,POWER engineered the required transmission and distribution taps and provid- ed survey,complete construction management and testing and energization services.Designed and con- structed on a compressed schedule to meet projected power requirements at the mine by the summer of 1983, South Butte Substation was completed on time and under budget. PROJECT COMPLETION:June 1983 PROJECT COST:$1.9 miilion CLUE GRANGER 138KV SWITCHING STATION SOUTHWESTERN WYOMING CLIENT Bridger Valley Electric Association (BVEA) DESIGN FEATURES m Design interface with existing facility mg Low-profile,expandable bus scheme CLIENT'S NEED m Provision for future transformation Engineer a 138kV switching station upgrade to meet m Detailed steel design increased power requirements and serve as a link ina system intertie designed to improve system stability. :a 1 (-} ( f as it \ a,i 'f an .x------pe t ' >ae veerieae>Ti | eb DESIGN SERVICES @ Access Road ®Lightning Shielding @ Station Layout @ Equipment Specifications @ Site Preparation @ Insulation Coordination @ Steel Structures @ Protection Coordination _@ Foundations @ Relaying &Control @ Cable &Conduit ©Metering @ Grounding @ Construction Drawings ®@ Station Lighting laMAJOR EQUIPMENT @ 138kV,600-amp group-operated airbreak switches m 69kV,600-amp group-operated airbreak switches a Steel A-frame structures PROJECT DESCRIPTION Intermountain Consumer Power Association retained POWER Engineers on behalf of its member cooperative, Bridger Valley Electric Association,to design a switching er2edet) .Suse it)bond $an ine ay a7 foe (cu FOS igus 1 .te tu Ls iy ees C '' "4 \ave om ,ae fs ry 6 .a a)ee i3 ik pe TS 1 z OhimyEtShe4||Ey af IantiaEeEeete = wt fb Pron tett - |a pron int) .:DETAL OF (1)&(pI DETAR OF (1D ----_: 5 ry 2 et Tae 1 u '- ott te wa anh On ryTh'er 28 mph |]31 fe s at TLE T 4°i }rw ort DETAR OF (gl)DETAM OF (hi) -;GX relies ital tm 18 COLUMNS MC GAI 7 18 -COLUMNSMK,GBI *EAC eear.t-Ure Poe Ce fraty Poa See Aa (hej Pow Senkoa>Py Py z Pheatz Tre wry Te (wetat ):@ a to cma (hey fom Sec Aw 'est Foe ta ae (mj fou Suc.eo far)on (us)WED Poe Be SECTION _A-A (AS NOT SEC -B CAS NOTED) station upgrade to serve growing power requirements in Additional project responsibilities included a detailed the cooperative's service territory.The new station would stability study that analyzed the proposed system also serve as part of an intertie between BVEA's system intertie.Designed for eventual 138kV operation,Granger and Pacific Power and Light Company system designed Switching Station was initially energized at 69kV. to provide improved stability and continuity of service under the increased loads.PROJECT COMPLETION:January 1982 The existing Granger 69kV yard,located 10 miles south PROJECT COST:$300,000 of BVEA's new Sweetwater 138x69kV Substation (also designed by POWER),was upgraded to provide 138kV switching-sectionalizing and future transformation for residential and industrial loads in the Granger area of Bridger Valley's service territory. POWER's design of the Granger 138kV Switching Station consisted of incorporating the existing 69kV switchrack into 138kV and 69kV bus schemes for switching,expand- able to accommodate oil circuit breakers and a 138-69kV transformation bay at a future date.Contemporary tubular steel station columns and architecturally configured wide- flange A-frame structures were custom designed to give the station a streamlined,visually unobtrusive appearance.Detailed fabrication drawings were prepared for all station structures. X CDE) ALYESKA PIPELINE SERVICE COMPANY TERMINAL POWER SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY VALDEZ,ALASKA CLIENT Alyeska Pipeline Service Company CLIENT'S NEED Provide a feasibility study on the Power Generation and Distribution System at the Alyeska Marine Ter- minal near Valdez,Alaska,to evaluate upgrades necessaryto maintain system reliability through 2005. PROJECT SERVICES @ Utility Intertie Feasibility @ Electrical System Database Development @ Computer Model of System @ Computer Analysis of System @ Distribution Design @ instrumentation &Relaying Upgrade Project Brief -Studies ISSUES AND CONCERNS 3 Accuracy of the computer model 1 Assessment of critical loads 2 Power system reliability 1 Elimination of contingency power outages PROJECT DESCRIPTION Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (Alyeska)con- tracted POWER Engineers to perform an engineer- ing study on the Power Generation and Oistnbution System at Alyeska's marine terminal near Valdez, Alaska.Alternatives were developed and evaluated to prepare recommendations for improving the reli- POWER) NN ability and operational performance of its terminal power generation and distribution system. POWER conducted a field investigation of the exist- ing terminal electrical system,including the 13.8kV distribution lines,power distribution substations,gen- eration plant and 480 volt low voltage distribution system to validate existing data and to obtain new data for the electrical studies. POWER conducted interviews with Alyeska's per- sonnel to determine capabilities of the existing SCADA system.For the new integrated terminal control system,POWER proposed features to im- prove load shedding and electrical system monitor- ing. POWER compiled data from the field investigationandAlyeska's system records to develop acomputer model of the electrical system for analysis.POWER created the electrical system database and one-line diagrams for the electrical system analysis software -(E-TAP 1000).To determine the capabilities and liabilities of the existing and proposed electrical systems,during normal and emergency operating modes,POWER conducted load flow,fault current, and protective device studies.POWER submitteda reporton the studies'findings and recommendations for upgrades and improvements to Alyeska. PROJECT COMPLETION: PROJECT COST: August 1992 $226,000 | Gil. an)eet avice |UY 2 3 At-Project Brief -Studies ePDOWER) U.S.AIR FORCE ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE REPAIR ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STUDY ANCHORAGE,ALASKA 2fet57Seetanmwentercabay+SeeTIec.bed*oewot.7a7Lye.”*.««<.$'$:>«?ms.*tayre*TYCheep.DhSete:anote:0oreWeceeott,«tt5Rlet.84H 7; 3 . r.}+;bY: | s.3 ryeaewae,omtnea-«eeaSagCLIENT U.S.Air Force, Department of Defense CLIENT'S NEED Evaluate the capability of the existing Elmendorf Air Force Base electrical power system to serve in- creasing load through the year 2000 and improve reliability of the aging system. PROJECT SERVICES @ Utility Intertie Coordination e Computer Analysis of System ©Computer Model of Utility Intertie @ Electrical System Database Development Project Brief -Studies @ Distribution Design @ Underground Feeder Design @ Station Upgrade @ instrumentation &Relaying CRITERIA #Reliable intertie for the Elmendorf AFB system with both Fort Richardson and Anchorage Municipal Light &Power (ML&P) a Intertie separation in the event of a system disturbance 8 Sufficient capacity to meet single generating unit contingency 8 Independent metering of Fort Richardson and ML&P interties PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Elmendorf Air Force Base (Elmendorf AFB) electrical distribution system is a totally self con- tained system thatincludes generation at West Power Plant (WPP),a 34.5kV subtransmission system, three 34.5-12.47kV distribution substations (WPP, Central Substation and Hospital Substation,and seventeen 12.47kV feeders serving the load distri- bution.The system,whichis approximately 35 years old,is operated and maintained by Elmendorf AFB personnel., Elmendorf AFB contracted POWER Engineers to perform an engineering study to investigate and assess the condition of the existing Elmendorf AFB electrical generation,subtransmission and distribu- tion system.Alternatives were developed and evalu- ated to prepare recommendations for upgrades and improvements to the Base's electrical system. There are presently two 34.5kV connections to other utility systems.One connection is to Anchorage Municipal Light and Power (ML&P)at WPP Substa- tion.The other connection is to Fort Richardson/ ML&P at Hospital Substation. POWER conducted a field investigation to verify equipment nameplate ratings,circuit configurations, conductor and cable sizes,and operating configura-tion for the electrical power system.POWER con- ducted interviews with Base operations and mainte- nance personnel,facilities managers and local utili- ties to develop normal and emergency operating modes and utility intertie requirements.Power plant operating records were researched to compile his- torical load data for Elmendorf AFB and prepare load forecasts to the year 2000. POWER compiled data from the field investigation and base records for the 12.47kV generating plant, 34.5kV subtransmission system and 12.47kV distn- bution feeders to develop a computer model of the electrical system for analysis.POWER evaluated five electrical system analysis software packages and recommended an analysis package that was 'best suited to Elmendorf AFB's needs. Project Brief -Studies Upon purchase of the analysis software,POWER created the electrical system database and one-line diagrams for the electrical system analysis software. Load flow,short circuit,transient stability and protec- tive device coordination studies were performed to assess the capabilities and liabilities of the existing and alternative electrical systems with normal and emergency operating modes.A report on the stud- ies'findings andrecommendations forupgrades and improvements was submitted to and approved by the Air Force. POWER designed an upgrade to the existing Hospi- tal Substation to provide a full-time intertie capability to ML&P and a nearby U.S.Army facility.POWER's recommendations for the point of connection to ML&P required the construction of a new breaker bay and transformer upgrade to the existing ML&P 115-34.5kV substation,therefore alleviating any ex- tra line routing and right of way expense. 'POWER prepared designs and specifications for replacement of approximatelytwo miles of 12.47kV underground cable (direct buried and in duct)to improve system reliability,provide loop feed capa- bility and bring the system into compliance with codes and standards. Upgrades to the 34.5kV system protection and me- tering were.also designed by POWER.The up- grades provided revenue class metering at the elec- trical utility intertie points and protection of the Elmendorf AFB electrical system from outages due to disturbances on the interconnected utility sys- tems. The project was completed on time and under bud- get. PROJECT COMPLETION:August 1992 PROJECT COST:$365,000 ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY ANCHORAGE-KENAI TRANSMISSION INTERTIE FEASIBILITY STUDY KENAI PENINSULA,ALASKA CLIENT Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) CLIENT'S NEED Conduct a feasibility study needed to determine the desirability of constructing a new intertie and/or upgrading the existing intertie between Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula. PROJECT SERVICES Route Study Field Surveys Land Ownership Analysis Study Area Mapping Cost Estimating Transmission System Studies Reconnaissance Studies Load Shedding Study Environmental Assessment ISSUES &CONCERNS Avalanche and Wind Damage Submarine Cable Placement System Stability System Reliability System Capacity Schedule Constraints Environmental Constraints Multiple Utility Coordination Multiple Agency Coordination GP-Project Brief UNIVERSITY UNDERGROUND iIMvaaé:z"e«ot25zcandIpv 4 GIROWOOD 0 3- _-tony F unoencnouno | -cant a | -j a |poaTacs CH | 20 |mH y UNOERGAOUNO CABLE a IMIQPQINT MESEAVONM STA NCS: +UNOERGROUNO : cams !gASHe1OMVAR+[AQOED TO LUSTING 10 MtVAR)EX STNG ASLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION A 115kKV transmission intertie de'nwee* Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsu extended outages because of a la exper ere} valancre 373 BP DOWER' wind damage in the winter.Although the generation capacity on the peninsula was able to meet the peak load during these outages, connected railbelt utilities wisned to maintain a reliable and stable transmission system because the existing transmission system was weakly interconnected with widely dispersed gen- eration.The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)and these other utilities were investigating the possibility of constructing a new intertie or upgrading the existing one.AEA contracted POWER to conduct a feasibility study for this purpose.The utility's concern was whether the potential increase in capacity and reliability would be worth the cost associated with engineering,permitting,right of way acquisition,construction,and operating and maintaining the facilities over its useful life. AEA specified five aspects for POWER to address: (1)determine the need for a new transmission line between Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula and determine a complete field of options if such a line is needed;(2)assess upgrading the existing Chugach Electric Association and Homer Electric Association lines; (3)conduct a transmission route selection study for a new transmission line;(4)determine environmental and permitting requirements for recommended routes;and,(5)prepare a cost estimate for the recommended new line and or upgrade of the existing line. After existing studies of the utility were reviewed,POWER conducted its own transmission system studies using an in-house system specifically designed for scientific and engineering applications.The POWER System Analysis (PSA)programs are run on POWER's network of supermini computers.These programs included load flow studies to evaluate the existing and proposed transmission system and a stability study to analyze the voltage and phase conditions during and immediately following a system disturbance.The results of these studies were analyzed to determine the optimum voltage level,conductor size,line configuration,switching requirements,and reactive compensation requirements for the proposed intertie. POWER also researched the land use and environmental issues concerned with this project and identified geographic conditions that would require special considerations.POWER developed cost estimates for land services such as right of way acquisitions and permits,as well as for engineering,material construction management,submarine cable construction, and maintenance costs for each alternative route. POWER selected a preferred route among four possible routes:the existing line upgraded to 230kV and three other proposed routes.POWER also determined the design criteria for the transmission system.Because the Cook Inlet must be crossed to reach the Peninsula from Anchorage,POWER addressed design and routing concerns for submarine cabling. POWER conducted this study in conjunction with Hart-Crowser,who provided environmental, land,and geotechnical services,with extensive Alaskan and arctic experience. PROJECT COMPLETION:May 1987 PROJECT COST:$100 million (est ) OPOWER) ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY NORTHEASTERN TRANSMISSION INTERTIE FEASIBILITY STUDY er PIGURE $ CLIENT Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) CLIENT'S NEED Conduct a feasibility study to determine the need for constructing a new intertie and upgrading existing facilities in northeastern Alaska. PROJECT SERVICES Data Acquisition Existing Studies Review Railbelt Utility Coordination Power Flow Analysis Load Flow Study Transient Stability Analysis Load Shedding Review Environmental Database GP-Project Brief Route Selection Preferred Route Identification Reconnaissance Study Routing Report Field Survey Preliminary Design Design Criteria Right of Way Agreements Permitting Requirements Cost Estimates ° Report Preparation ISSUES &CONCERNS Fast-track project Electrocon PSA software On-site field investigation of study area Multiple utility coordination Construction or upgrade of more than 470 miles of transmission line Construction and modifications of s.« stations @LOWER PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Alaska Energy Authority (AEA)and the Railbelt Utilities,which are seven utilities sharing existing facilities,operate a single-circuitelectricalintertieconnectingtheAnchorage area and the Fairbanks area.The intertie, completed in 1985,was limited to 70 MW and had a single contingency.With factors such as the Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project adding 90 MW to the system in 1990,and the extreme weather conditions of the area,AEA wished to improve reliability and transfer capability.AEA proposed a Northeast Intertie,paralleling the existing intertie.AEA retained POWER Engineers to perform a feasibility study for these proposed lines and facilities. The Northeast Transmission Intertie required: 1.Upgrading an existing 115kV line between Teeland Substation and O'Neal Substation; 2.Construction of approximately 285 miles of 230kV overhead transmission line between O'Neal and Jarvis Creek Substations (with a new switchyard at Gakona); 3.Construction of a 138kV overhead trans- mission line between Carney Substation and North Pole Substation;and 4.Modifications to the O'Neal,Pumping Station No.11,Jarvis Creek,Carney,and North Pole Substations. POWER provided feasibility-level design,cost estimates and associated engineering,route selection,and permitting studies for these line sections and stations. The project was organized in two phases.In the first phase,POWER analyzed the trans-mission system and performed a reconnaissance study to determine both a preferred route and an alternative route.In the second phase,POWER performed a transmission system design of tre preferred route.POWER identified landowners. right of way,and permit requirements for tre preferred route.A critical part of Phase 2 was a field investigation of the preferred route to acquire specific geotechnical and environ. mental information critical to the design of tre various facilities. An Alaskan-based environmental engineenrg firm,Hart Crowser,joined POWER for this project.Hart Crowser was involved in the rout- ing and environmental tasks for the feasibility study. This complex project was given a relatively short time period to complete the study.Because of the short time frame,rapid data transfer for the studies was necessary for the project.POWER's Electrocon PSA software capabilities was a major asset for the study. During the transmission system analysis,POWER determined the reactive compensation require- ments and the transmission line conductor size and configuration. To identify alternative routes and prepare route maps,POWER used Alaska State Department of Natural Resources (DNR)maps.On these maps, significant routing constraints were identified and incorporated into a general analysis.From there,a recommendation for a preferred route was made.With the preferred route transferred to DNR maps to determine specific ownership,a list of permits and right of way agreements were developed.This land information was used later in performing the final cost estimates. Cost estimates included costs associated with design,permitting,land acquisition,engin- eertng,surveying,construction labor and materials,and construction management and administration. The project study area is subject to varied climatic and geologic conditions.The terrain ranges from mountains to tundra;the climate 's temperate to arctic.This variety posed challeng- ing design considerations for POWER's design team.One design feature was structure selection.A choice for extreme weather conditions where frost heaves are prevalent were tubular guyed "X”structures with pile foundations. With the completion of the transmission system studies,POWER submitted a final report.This report presented the results of the electrical data review,utility meetings,environmental reconnaissance,land use issues,line route system requirements,cost estimates,and the transmission studies. PROJECT COMPLETION:=February 1989 PROJECT COST:$100 million CPQWER CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY NORTHERN VERMONT SUBSTATION EXPANSION VERMONT CLIENT Citizens Utilities Company -Vermont (CUC) CLIENT'S NEED Increase system capacity and reliability by adding one new substation and upgrading three others. DESIGN SERVICES @ Switchboards ®SCADA &Commun ©Structure Design @ Foundation Design ®Oil Containment ®Control Building @ Procurement ©Construction Specs ®Contractor Selection ®Preliminary Design ®Site Investigation ®Geotech.Design @ Electrical Assembly @ Foundation Plan @ Site Preparation ®Cable &Conduit @ Grounding Design @ Instrumentation Drawings Support @ Relaying ©Constr.Support @ Equip.Connection ¢Testing/Energization Diagrams . DESIGN FEATURES Microprocessor-Based Relaying System Custom SCADA Control System Ring Bus Configurations for System Reliability Severe Weather Conditions Beyond NESC Heavy Loading Fast-Track ScheduleOOOOO PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUC is in the process of upgrading its transmis- sion system to increase capacity and reiiar !.ty Project Brief -Substation The utility contracted POWER to provide design, construction support,final inspection and testing and energization for the addition of one new substation and upgrade of three others near the U.S.-Canadian border in northern Vermont. POWER had previously provided engineering design and construction services for 33 miles of new 120kV transmission line for the system. Key concerns for CUC were system reliability and ease of operation.CUC wanted a custom controls system to handle the special needs of its system,including the need to switch power between U.S.and Canadian systems with mini- mal interruption of power.POWER designed a completely automated control system that en- ables operators to perform all station control and monitoring remotely via SCADA communications. The four substations are located in a climate subject to very cold temperatures and extremely severe ice storms.POWER designed the stations to accommodate 2" radial icing and temperatures down to minus 50°F. CUC elected to use ring bus configurations for the substations to promote system reliability The station and line are protected ry microprocessor-based line relaying and soid state back-up and bus relaying. POWER designed the four stations for com. patibility and uniformity to increase operaiicr4 efficiency.Similar relaying schemes,ccrirc 5 and metering were used on all stations '.¢ consistency and ease of maintenance oa devices are monitored by a common Sala system located at CUC's operating center POWER performed complete design ° new station and the station modifications,including electrical,control,civil and structural engineering.POWER also provided extensive construction support,final inspection,testing and energization. Newport Substation The Newport Substation is a new substation consisting of a four-breaker 120kV ring bus,two 2/16/20 MVA 120-46kV transformers in parallel, a six-breaker 46kV ring bus,a 6 MVA 46- 12.47kV transformer,contro!building,battery system,SCADA communications,and asso- ciated switches,structures,foundations,oil containment,graunding,instrument transform- ers,Station service and control and relaying. The station was designed for 100 MVA ultimate capacity.- Substation Additions The Highgate Substation addition involved installation of a new 30/40/50 MVA 120-46kV Project Brief -Substation transformer,120kV power circuit breaker,asso- ciated switches,structures,foundations,oil containment,instrument transformers,and con- trol and relaying to the existing five-breaker 46kV ring bus. The Irasburg and Newport Center substation modifications consisted of adding a 46kV power circuit breaker,new control house,battery system,associated switches,instrument transformers,and control and relaying. Fast-Track Schedule Because of a contractual arrangement with another entity,CUC required a fast-track sched- ule to get this project on line by April 1,1993. POWER completed design and construction in less than one year,in time to meet CUC's deadline.: PROJECT COMPLETION:April 1993 PROJECT COST:=$5 Million Vil.COMPANY PROFILE POWER PROFILE In 1976,POWER Engineers,Inc.,was aa)formed as a consulting engineering firm for I MQWER.:ENGINEEASelectricpowersupplysystems,hence its name.Since then,POWER has grown to become a full-service A-E firm,currently the 18th largest in the U.S.,according to the Consulting and Specifying Engineer "Industry Giants"listing for 1993. POWER is an employee-owned company with more 400 than employees,based in Hailey,Idaho,with offices throughout the country and abroad.Today,POWER's engineering disciplines include architectural,electrical,mechanical,instrumentation and controls,civil and structural engineering,communications and system design including telecommunications,SCADA,and human factors engineering. POWER's diverse staff includes e Project management and support start,many who've worked in the utility industry. e Engineers and design staff who work with the latest tools and programs to deliver top quality designs. e Field personnel who understand uility design needs. CPIMER POWER -UTILITY SERVICES ARE OUR SPECIALTY We've grown over the years,yet utility engineering remains the mainstay of our operation.POWER employs knowledgeable engineers and technicians with specialized experience to serve the needs of electric utility systems.We specialize in providing the ght team for the job -whether it takes supplementing our in- house engineers,designers and drafters with a team of specialized subconsultants, or meeting project needs quickly by augmenting project staff from other areas of our own multidisciplinary staff. POWER offers complete engineering services for power supply systems of all types including: e Project feasibility and system studies e Design and specification of overhead and underground transmission and distribution lines : e Substation projects e SCADA/communications systems e Environmental services including site assessments,remediation,regulatory compliance and permitting e Lands services including right-of-way,title,appraisal,easement and property negotiation,and permit acquisition e Construction management,safety services,start-up services and field engineering,as well as contract administration and procurement e Automated mapping,facilities management and geographic information systems e Full-service surveying e Assessment,inspection and maintenance services for transmission lines and substations PZIWER) REGIONAL OFFICES OFFER QUICK RESPONSE POWER's engineering takes place at our Hailey,Idaho,headquarters and at our regional offices located throughout the United States.Project teams have the advantage of working on-site,with the ability to bring in additional expertise or manpower from our multidiscipline staff in Hailey when necessary.Regional offices give our clients quick,on-site response. POWER Office Locations pea-S Hailey,ID\y Boise,ID Z Coeur d'Alene,!D Sacramento,CA Portland,OR Eagle River,AK Denver,CO Butte,MT Austin,TX Appleton,WI PEOPLE AT POWER The essence of POWER is a corpur.ate structure and management style that brings some of the best people in the business to our company and then allows those people to bring their best effort to cach proiect Our personnel also bring interesiirey ind valued experience to POWER from different backgrounds in the elect'..'+industry and from many different parts of the world.POWER's Quali.°°>:includes an ongoing and organized process for mutual training and >.-*-e transfer within this varied and talented group. CPOWER PROJECT TEAM Typically,POWER assembles a project team from its own in-house staff complement.When we believe it is in the best interest of the client to retain specialty subcontractors for electric utility work,our reputation allows us to call on the very best. POWER's Project Teams are always hand-picked by the Project Manager specifically to meet the needs of the client.Our in-house resources translate into cost savings for projects because Project Managers have access to experienced personnel selected from the following groups: Project Management Substation Transmission and System StudiesEngineeringDistributionLine Engineering Systems/Controls Construction Civil/Structural EnvironmentalEngineeringManagemen'Geotechnical and Lands Procurement Engineering Services CORPORATE MANAGEMENT POWER is organized under a Board of Directors responsible for establishing the firm's direction and policies.The Board is comprised of key personnel who are principals in the firm and also share major project management and engineering CPOMER responsibilities.This corporate structure ensures that all projects are managed by individuals who have top level management skills as well as significant involvement in corporate operations and direction.POWER clients realize the benefits of dealing directly with project managers and engineers with the authority to make decisions and to personally resolve problems quickly. PROJECT MANAGEMENT POWER uses an integrated project management system we developed more than a decade ago.For large projects,POWER assembles a total project management package.The package includes a uniformly numbered Budget,Schedule,Task Sequence Diagram and Work Plan that provide an integrated and comprehensive picture of complex projects at any point in the project lifetime.The PM package allows the Project Manager and the client to maintain a vivid,accurate sense of progress.It allows both of them to spot project tasks that are going off track and develop solutions for them.POWER uses a sophisticated management database to track and report its projects. POWER's PM system is particularly valuable for managing subconsultants Subconsultants are kept scrupulously informed about the progress of their work in the context of the entire project.The PM system gives our Project Manager the information necessary to redirect resources to keep subconsultant performance in line with schedule objectives. ) | QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURES POWER was founded on the strong belief that the long-term growth and prosperity of any business is directly dependent on conscientious work =Qur commitment to high standards of quality is even stronger today. Before projects are initiated.detailed task descriptions and checklists are developed to specifically define project requirements and to ensure that enginee!s and support personnel have an accurate base upon which to build their planning | BOWER POWER personnel recognize that systematic checking and control of documents and drawings are imperative on all projects.All personnel adhere to document generation,checking and filing procedures.POWER's Quality Assurance Program is directed toward compliance with the requirements of all technical,local,state and federal design,construction,safety and environmental codes.Additional requirements of the client are always considered to ensure satisfaction.Moreover, client review and approval milestones are built into project schedules to ensure that clients have input and,therefore,receive the products they desire. THE POWER COMMITMENT:SUCCESS POWER has grown and succeeded because we have focused on our two most important assets:our people and our clients.With our commitment to being employee-owned,encouraging growth from within,and working as a team,we have created an environment where people do their best work and enjoy doing it. Our clients recognize and appreciate the results of that working environment. They receive projects that are completed within budget and in a timely manner, that meet their needs and find solutions In the end,our clients succeed.At POWER,we believe that when our clients succeed,we succeed. C2IWER ee GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC.Box 71249,Fairbanks,Alaska 99707-1249,Phone 907-452-1151 February 10,1994 Shannon and Wilson,Inc. 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks AK 99709 Attention:Rohn Abbott Re:Request for Proposal -Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigation Golden Valley Electric Association,Inc.intends to contract with a geotechnical firm for an investigation to determine the surface and subsurface conditions of the terrain along the proposed corridor of the Healy -Fairbanks transmission intertie.The corridor traverses a number of geologic areas shown on the attached route maps.The.work is proposed to be scheduled in two phases. Phase I will be a preliminary investigation,based on the proposed routing,and will provide information to be used in preliminary foundation and anchor design and for preparing cost estimates. Phase II will be a final investigation along the final route,just prior to construction,and will provide the geotechnical information necessary for final design of foundations and anchors. The transmission line configuration will be mainly a X-tower design using weathering steel towers with suspension insulators as shown in Figure 1.A section of single pole structures with provisionsforonecircuitof7.2/12.5 kV three phase underbuild will be used for the final 3 or 4 miles into the Fairbanks area.A copy of the preliminary routing is enclosed for use in this proposal.The proposed transmission line has been divided into five links for administrative purposes.A small scale map has been included to delineate the various links. The proposed scope of work is attached for inclusion in your proposal.The scope of work has been broken down into nine tasks which ares 1.0 Project Administration 2.0 Data Review 3.0 Study Design Criteria 4.0 Geological Mapping GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC. Shannon and Wilson,Inc. February 10,1994 Page 2 Request for Proposal -Geotechnical Investigation 5.0 Soils Boring Locations and Data6.0 Foundation/Anchor Type 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods .8.0 Field and Laboratory Reports 9.0 Final Report The proposed tasks and responsibilities associated with task completion have been notated and are presented in the responsibility chart provided as an attachment to this letter.The responsibility chart is attached to illustrate specific responsibility sharing and is not intended to be a complete list ofrequiredduties. Completion date for all work and presentation of the Phase 1 studies and reports shall be June 1,1994.The areas shown as Link 2 and Link 4 lie within poorly drained areas of the floodplain anddrillingwillneedtobecompletedpriortospringbreakup.Forthepurposeofthisproposal,soil borings within these links shall be completed by mid-April 1994.If alternative time frames are proposed,please present a detailed schedule in your proposal. Phase II of the Geotechnical Investigation will commence after the final alignment has been determined and the structures have been located in the field.It is anticipated that notice-to-proceed will be in May or June of 1995 with final reports to be completed prior to construction in September 1995. A Digital Video Geographic (DVG)survey system will be used tocollectdataonroutealternativesasanaidinthealternatecomparisonsandselectionprocess.This data will be available to the selected consultant in June 1994 to augment other available data. Firms wishing to be considered should respond in the form of a proposal and statement of qualifications along with the following: 1)Resumes of staff available to support the work; 2)Man-hour breakdown for each work task within Phase 1 and 2 on the form provided; 3)Cost breakdown on the form provided and an appropriate fee schedule; 4)Task schedule to meet proposed completion dates; 5)Firms ability to proceed with the work immediately upon notice-to-proceed; 6)Sample of a similar project recently completed by the proposed project personnel; 7)A list of applicable local experience performed by the GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC. Shannon and Wilson,Inc. February 10,1994 Page 3 Request for Proposal -Geotechnical Investigation proposed project personnel; 8)Map showing proposed boring locations; 9)Proposed laboratory tests; 10)Proposed field procedures;and 11)Proposed method or mapping system for determining and recording coordinate locations of boring sites. Project proposals will be evaluated on price and on the supplied information.Personal presentations are not necessary,however,if you have questions,don't hesitate to contact us. Proposal and information requested shall be sent to Golden Valley Electric Association,Inc.,Engineering Department,PO Box 71249, Fairbanks AK 99707-1249,and plainly marked "Proposal:Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Transmission Line -Geotechnical Services." Proposals will be accepted until 5:00 p.m.,local time,February 22,1994.The contract form will be that of the REA Form 244 Engineering Services Contract including the Golden Valley Purchase Order with Standard Terms and Conditions,copies which are included in this letter. Sincerely, LI- Steven Haagenson Manager of Engineering Services Enclosure:Route Map Geotechnical -Scope of Work and Geologic MapsREAForm244/Purchase Order Terms and Conditions Cost Breakdown by Task and Link form Responsibility ChartMan-hour Breakdown per resource/task form 1.0 2.0 3.0 GEOTECHNICAL SOIL INVESTIGATION,PHASE 1 NORTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK INTRODUCTION The objective of this geotechnical investigation is to determine surface and subsurface conditions of the terrain along the proposed corridor of the Healy -Fairbanks transmission intertie,The corridor traverses a number of geologic areas as shown on the attached route maps.It is necessary to assess these areas for preliminary design of structure foundations and guy anchors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed transmission route is approximately 100 miles in length with an expected average of five structures per mile.The line will be constructed primarily on tubular steel X-Structures as shown in Figure 1.Each support member will experience ground line reactions of shear,uplift,and compression during various loading conditions.Guying reactions will be tension loads only.: WORK DESCRIPTION The geotechnical investigation and report prepared by a professional Engineer registered in the State of Alaska should include the following items. A.GEOLOGICAL MAPPING Based on the route shown on the attached maps,the Consultant shall research the geological history,surface and subsurface geology,surface vegetation,slope orientation, known areas of permafrost and other factors which would influence the choice of foundations and anchors.Based on this research,a preliminary geologic map of the line shall be prepared.A preliminary boring program shall be performed to determine the design properties of soils in each area of different geologic conditions and to better delineate the areas.A total of 25 borings to an average depth of 35 feet shall be assumed. The Consultant shall include a preliminary recommendation of boring locations with his proposal. B.BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA For each different geological area identified in the mapping and preliminary borings. the Consultant shall prepare a design soil profile to be used in preliminary foundation and anchor design and for preparing cost estimates.The design soil profiles should be suitable for use in design computer programs (for example L-PILE from Ensoft.Inc.) and include a minimum of the following for each soil layer: Physical Description and Unified Soil Classification Frost Susceptibility Class Angle of Internal Friction Assumed SPT blow count In Situ (moist),dry and submerged unit weights Moisture Content @ Location of the water table @ For Clays,the undrained shear strength,the unconfined compressive strength and the strain corresponding to &the maximum principal stress difference in triaxial tests using confining pressures based on the depth of the clay. @ If bedrock is assumed,the type of rock,compressive strength and the amount of blocking : @ Initial modulus of subgrade reaction In addition,the depth of the active layer,heave forces and ice content to be assumed for design shall be included.Geodetic positions shall be noted on all bore holes and Consultant's proposal shall state the method and accuracies to be used in determining position. C.RECOMMENDATIONS The Consultant will work with the Owner in developing foundation recommendation. Utilizing tower reactions loads given by the Owner,the Consultant will provide recommendations for foundation type,size,and depth (i.e.pipe pile,H-pile,battered pile installation,rock anchors,etc.).Also,using tension loads furnished by the Owner, the Consultant will provide recommendations for anchoring down guys.Anchoring options are;grouted rod,pipe or H-pile (vertical or battered),embedded plate,screw anchor,or Manta Ray anchor.These should be provided for each identified area of the Consultant prepared map. Recommendations should be based not only on test data but also on available data for existing facilities.Performance of an existing transmission line near the route should be reviewed.An existing 138 kV guyed delta transmission line runs along a route parallel to the proposed new line.The line was constructed with driven pile foundations,screw anchors,drilled wood piles and floating concrete pad foundations.The Consultant shall review information provided by the Owner concerning performance of the existing foundations and anchors and their relationship to areas with similar soils on the new line route.Other facilities recently constructed near the route should also be reviewed. 4.0 PROCEDURES A.BORINGS 1.Perform soil borings at the locations determined by the Consultant.The depth of the boring shall be 30-40 feet below ground surface depending on soil conditions. 2.If unusual conditions are encountered,including but not limited to unanticipated 'materials which cannot be penetrated by standard sampling equipment,the Consultant shall immediately consult with the Owner.Subject to the approval and instructions of the Owner,the Consultant shall either proceed with measures as are required to obtain the necessary information or relocate to a new location and begin a new boring. 3.The Consultant shall advise the Owner as to any further exploration and testing required to obtain information that Consultant requires for a professional interpretation of subsoil conditions and shall perform such additional work as authorized by Owner. 4.Sampling operations for both disturbed and undisturbed samples shall be in tw 5.0. accordance with recommended American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standards and other procedures,and as necessary to produce the information required for the report. B.DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS s A qualified geologist or geotechnical engineer shall determine the type of,and number of tests required to provide the Owner with the requested information.Adequacy of this information is the responsibility of the Consultant.Due to terrain and vegetation,many areas may not be accessible over land.The Consultant will be responsible for determining the method of accessing all areas required to provide the necessary geotechnical data. C.FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS 1.Prepare a report detailing the field and laboratory findings.All data required to be recorded according to ASTM Standards and other standard test methods employed shall be obtained,recorded in the field and referenced to boring numbers;soils shall be classified in the field logs in accordance with current applicable ASTM standards and other standards,including but not limited to ASTM Standard D2488,but the classification for final logs shall be based on the field information,plus results of tests plus further inspection of samples in the laboratory by the Consultant.Identify the ASTM Standards or other recognized and testing methods used. Include with the report a chart illustrating the soil classification criteria and the terminology and symbols used in the boring logs. .Using drawings provided by the Owner,include as part of the report the locations of test boring(s). Provide vertical sections for each boring plotted and graphically presented showing boring number,sampling method used,date of start and finish,surface elevations, description of soil and thickness of each layer,number of blow counts per foot,frost penetration and groundwater elevation.Note the locationof strata containing organic materials,wet materials or other inconsistencies that might affect engineering conclusions. D.FINAL REPORT Upon completion of the geotechnical investigation,the Consultant shall provide the Owner the following information:WPYenEBore logs Map showing boring locations Lab results Geologic map Installation recommendations RESPONSE INFORMATION The following information must accompany the Consultants proposal for the described work. 1. 2. Map showing proposed boring locations Proposed laboratory tests 3.Proposed field procedures 4.Proposed method or mapping system for determining and recording coordinate location of boring sites. 1.0 2.0 3.0 GEOTECHNICAL SOIL INVESTIGATION,PHASE 2 NORTHERN INTERTIE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK INTRODUCTION The objective of this geotechnical investigation is to determine surface and subsurface conditions of the terrain along the final alignment of the Healy -Fairbanks transmission intertie.The corridor traverses a number of geologic areas as shown on the attached route maps.It is necessary to assess these areas for final design of structure foundations and guy anchors.Recommendations for final designs will be required.Also,during construction a geologist or geotechnical engineer will be needed on an on-call basis.(not to be included in this scope of work) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed transmission route is approximately 100 miles in length with an expected average of five structures per mile.The line wilt be constructed primarily on tubular steel X-Structures as shown in Figure 1.Each support member will experience ground line reactions of shear,uplift,and compression during various loading conditions.Guying reactions will be tension loads only. WORK DESCRIPTION The geotechnical investigation and report prepared by a professional Engineer registered in the State of Alaska should include the following items. A.GEOLOGICAL MAPPING Based on the route shown on the attached maps,the Consultant shall research the geological history,surface and subsurface geology,surface vegetation,slope orientation, known areas of permafrost and other factors which would influence the choice of foundations and anchors.Based on this research,a geologic map of the line shall be prepared with transition zones well defined.A boring program shall be performed to determine the design properties of soils in each area of different geologic conditions and to better delineate the areas.One boring per mile to an average depth of 35 feet shall be assumed. B.BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA For each of the borings,the Consultant shall prepare a design soil profile to be used in foundation and anchor design and tor preparing cost estimates.The design soil profiles should be suitable for use in design computer programs (for example L-PILE from Ensoft.Inc.)and include a minimum ot the following for each soil layer: Physical Description and Unitied Soul Classification Frost Susceptibility Class Angle of Internal Friction Assumed SPT blow count In Situ (moist),dry and submeryed unit weights Moisture Content e Location of the water table @ For Clays,the undrained shear strength,the unconfined compressive strength and the strain corresponding to &the maximum principal stress difference in triaxial tests using confining pressures based on the depth of the clay. e@ If bedrock is assumed,the type of rock,compressive strength and the amount of blocking@Initialmodulus of subgrade reaction In addition,the depth of the active layer,heave forces and ice content to be assumed for design shall be included.: C.RECOMMENDATIONS The Consultant will work with the Owner in developing final foundation recommendations.Utilizing tower reactions loads given by the Owner,the Consultant will provide recommendations for foundation type,size,and depth (i.e.pipe pile,H-pile, battered pile installation,rock anchors,etc.).Also,using tension loads furnished by the Owner,the Consultant will provide recommendations for anchoring down guys. Anchoring options are;grouted rod,pipe or H-pile (vertical or battered),embedded plate,screw anchor,or Manta Ray anchor.These should be provided for each identified area of the Consultant prepared map. Recommendations should be based not only on test data but also on available data for existing facilities.Performance of an existing transmission line near the route should be reviewed.An existing 138 kV guyed delta transmission line runs along a route parallel to the proposed new line.The line was constructed with driven pile foundations,screw anchors,drilled wood piles,and floating concrete pad foundations.The Consultant shall review information provided by the Owner concerning performance of the existing foundations and anchors and their relationship to areas with similar soils on the new line route.Other facilities recently constructed near the route should also be reviewed.The Consultant should identify areas where it would be advisable to have an on-site geologist during the construction phase. Consultant shall assist Owner in establishing criteria for use by the construction contractor and Owner's field staff to determine the foundation and anchor types and depths in the field.This will include criteria based on field observable characteristics such as pile driving resistance and cuttings from drilling operations. 4.0 PROCEDURES A.BORINGS 1.Perform soil borings at the locations determined by the Consultant.The depth of the boring shall be 30-40 feet below ground surface depending on soil conditions. 2.If unusual conditions are encountered,including but not limited to unanticipated materials which cannot be penetrated by standard sampling equipment,the Consultant shall immediately consult with the Owner.Subject to the approval and instructions of the Owner,the Consultant shall either proceed with measures as are required to obtain the necessary information or relocate to a new location and bein a new boring. 3.The Consultant shall advise the Owner as to any further exploration and testing required to obtain information that Consultant requires for a professions 5.0 interpretation of subsoil conditions and shall perform such additional work as authorized by Owner. Sampling operations for both disturbed and undisturbed samples shall be in accordance with recommended American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standards and other procedures,and as necessary to produce the informationrequiredforthereport. B.DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS A qualified geologist or geotechnical engineer shall determine the type of,and number of tests required to provide the Owner with the requested information.Adequacy of this information is the responsibility of the Consultant. C.FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS 1.Prepare a report detailing the field and laboratory findings.All data required to be recorded according to ASTM Standards and other standard test methods employed shall be obtained,recorded in the field and referenced to boring numbers;soils shall be classified in the field logs in accordance with current applicable ASTM standards and other standards,including but not limited to ASTM Standard D2488,but the classification for final logs shall be based on the field information,plus results of tests plus further inspection of samples in the laboratory by the Consultant.IdentifytheASTMStandardsorotherrecognizedandtestingmethodsused. Include with the report a chart illustrating the soil classification criteria and the terminology and symbols used in the boring logs. Using drawings provided by the Owner,include as part of the report the locations of test boring(s). Provide vertical sections for each boring plotted and graphically presented showing boring number,sampling method used,date of start and finish,surface elevations, description of soil and thickness of each layer,number of blow counts per foot,frost penetration and groundwater elevation.Note the location of strata containing organic materials,wet materials or other inconsistencies that might affect engineering conclusions. D.FINAL REPORT Upon completion of the geotechnical investigation,the Consultant shall provide the Owner the following information:WPWNPrBore logs Map showing boring locations Lab results Geologic map Installation recommendations RESPONSE INFORMATION The following information must accompany the Consultants proposal for the described work. 1.Proposed laboratory tests 2.Proposed field procedures 3.Proposed method or mapping system for determining and recording coordinate location of boring sites. FILE NAME:_X-STRUCT.OWG a - SCALE:"°°5S IDRYDEN /ILalRue,lnc.CONSULTING /ENGINEERS DATE:02/10/94 DESIGNED BY:K.DYSON DRAWN BY:R.ELLWOOD GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION "¥eT CAL TUBULAR STEEL X-STRUCTURE ORAWING NO. e Y of1 1 HF138GEO.XLS Geotechnical Engineering Cost Breakdown by Design Task and Links Project:Healy to Fairbanks ?230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigations Task #Link # 1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 2.0 DATA REVIEW Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 3.0 STUDY DESIGN CRITERIA Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 4.0 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 5.0 SOILS BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 6.0 FOUNDATION /ANCHOR TYPE Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 7.0 DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 8.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 9.0 FINAL REPORT Phase 1 MH $ Phase 2 MH $ 0.0 EXPENSES -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Phase 1 $ Phase 2 $ TOTAL LABOR AND EXPENSES Zz CONTINGENCY 10 00% GRAND TOTAL N.T.E.9 =====>|| Page 1 HF138GEO.XLS Geotechnical Engineering Responsibility Chart Project:Healy to Fairbanks *230 kV Intertie X =Primary Responsibility x =Minor Support Geotechnical Investigations RESPONSIBILITY Task #GVEA |ENGR|OTHERS 1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 1.1 Project initiation meeting xX X X 1.2 Monthly Progress Reports X 1.3 Project Administration X 2.0 DATA REVIEW 2.1 Review area maps X 2.2 Review performance of the existing transmission line x X Xx 2.3 Review other facilities constructed near the route X 2.4 Review Geologic data X 3.0 STUDY DESIGN CRITERIA 3.1 Define drilling criteria X x 3.2 Define sampling criteria Xx x 3.3 Define analysis criteria X x 3.4 Verify criteria compatable with design programs X x 4.0 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING 4.1 Research geological history X 4.2 Research surface and subsurface geology X 4.3 Research surface vegetation X 4.4 Research slope orientation X 4.5 Research known areas of permafrost Xx 4.6 Research other factors X 4.7 Prepare Preliminary geologic map 5.0 SOILS BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA 5.1 Recommend Preliminary boring locations Xx 6.0 FOUNDATION /ANCHOR TYPE 6.1 Determine tower reaction loads Xx 6.2 Recommend foundation type,size,and depth xX x 7.0 DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS 7.1 Apply for right of entry to do preliminary drilling X 7.2 Preliminary borings (25)to average depth of 35 feet X Page 3 HF138GEO.XLS Geotechnical Engineering Responsibility Chart Project:Healy to Fairbanks ”230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigations X =Primary Responsibility x =Minor Support RESPONSIBILITY Task #GVEA {|ENGR|OTHERS 8.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS 8.1 Prepare report detailing the field and lab findings X 8.2 Develop chart for soil classification criteria Xx 8.3 Prepare vertical sections for each boring X 9.0 FINAL REPORT 9.1 Prepare final report on soil investigations X 9.2 Bore Logs X 9.3 Map showing boring locations X 9.4 -_Lab results X 9.5 Geologic Map X Page 4 HF138GEO.XLS Project:Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigations Man-hour Breakdown per Resource /Task |Unit$$g $$$$TOTAL TOTAL Project Project Engineer Geologist Driller Clerical MHs MHs Manager Engineer Staff Phase 1 Phase 2 || PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Phase 1 | Phase 2 | DATA REVIEW Phase 1 !| Phase 2 | STUDY DESIGN CRITERIA Phase 1 |} Phase 2 7 | GEOLOGICAL MAPPING |a Phase 1 a st | Phase 2 4 | SOILS BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA | Phase 1 i :i Phase 2 | FOUNDATION /ANCHOR TYPE : _ Phase 1 - | Phase 2 ; | DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS i a Phase 1 |a Le } Phase 2 |__|| FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS a a Phase 1 ; | Phase 2 | FINAL REPORT Phase 1 || Phase 2 to | Total MH=>I | Page 5 Exhibit II REA Bulletin 41-1R1 (SAMPLE) ENGINEERING SERVICE CONTRACT SPECIAL S2zVICES AGREEMENT made as of »19___-Ss_:be tween(hereinafter called the "Qwner")and (hereinafter called the "Engineer”™). WHEREAS,the Owner owns and operates a rural electric system (hereinaftercalledthe"System'")financed by a loan or loans from the United States of America,acting threugh the Administrator of the Rural Electrification Admin- istration;and WHEREAS,the Engineer represents that he has sufficient experienced personnel and equipment to perform,and the Owner desires the Engineer to perform the engineering services herein described in respect of the System. NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein contained,the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE I GENERAL The Engineer shall render diligently and competently the engineering services described in the Schedule (hereinafter called the "Schedule"), attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this Agreement,upon the terms and conditions herein stated. ARTICLE II CChPENSATION The Owner shall pay the Engineer for the services performed pursuant to this Agreement at the times and in the amounts provided in the Schedule.The Engineer shall submit a statement of all compensation due hereunder to the Owner after all services required by this Agreement have been completed. Unless otherwise specified,the Owner shall pay the Engineer within ten (10) days after approval of such statement and after approval by the Owner of any required reports,drawings or designs, Note:This form may be used for minor architectural services by changing "Engineer"to "Architect"and "engineering services"to "architectural services," aca roam 244 12-85 ARTICLE III MISCELLANEOUS Section 1.LICENSE.The Engineer shall comply with all applicable statutes pertaining to engineering. (a)The Engineer warrants that he possesses License No.issued to him by the State of on the day of e (Strike out inapplicable paragraph.) Section 2.INSURANCE.The Engineer shall take out and maintain workmen's compensation insurance covering all employees of the Engineer who shall per- form any of the obligations of the Engineer hereunder,whether or not such insurance is required by the laws of the State governing the employment of any such employee.If any employee is not subject to the workmen's compensa- tion laws of such State,such insurance shall extend to such employee voluntary coverage to the same extent as though such employee were subject to such laws. The policy of insurance shall be in such form and issued by such insurer as shall be satisfactory to the Owner.**See below Section 3.QUALIFIED PERSONNEL.The obligations and duties to be performed by the Engineer under this Agreement shall be performed by persons qualified to perform such duties efficiently.The Engineer,if the Owner shall so direct,shall replace any engineer or other person employed by the Imgineer in connection with the work. Section h.ASSIGNMENT.The obligations of the Engineer under this Agreement shall not be assigmed without the approval in writing of the Owner. Section 5 -The Engineer's Proposal for Services dated ,199_,by mutual agreement,incorporatedintoandmadeapartofthiscontract. Section 6 -The attached Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc.(GVEA)Purchase Order Terms and Conditions are hereby,bymutualagreement,incorporated into and made a part of thiscontract.If conflicts exist between the Form 244 Contract and the Purchase Order Terms and Conditions,the Form 244 will govern. **The limits of insurance have been increased to be compliantwith7CFRPart1788,Subpart C -Insurance for Contractors, Engineers and Architects 7CFR 1788.48 -Contract Requirements. ca roam 244 42-55 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused idulyexecuted.sed this Agreement to be Owner By *rresidentATTESTse pecretary Engineer By President,Partner ATTEST:(Strike out inapplicable designation.) vecretary SCHEDULE 1.SERVICES.The Engineer,in the shortest reasonable time,snall prepare and furnish to the Owner See Engineer's Proposal for Services for Scope of Work and Schedule It is agreed,without limiting the generality of the foregoing,that all .drawings,designs,specifications and other incidental engineerin?wors or materials,furnished by the Ingineer hereunder shall be and re:.ain the property of the Ower. All services to be rendered hereunder shall be subject tr the directica and approval of the Omer. The Owner shall pay the Engineer the sum of 3 N/A as compensationforallservices,labor and material required hereby end as specified in the Agreement to which this Schedule is attached and made a part. GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC.(GVEA) Purchase Order-Terms and Conditions PRICE/QUANTITIES:The price or prices and quantities stated on the face of this purchase order shall be firm and fixed except as altered with written approval of GVEA's purchasing agent.The price stated shail include federal,state and tocal taxes unless otherwise expressly provided. ACCEPTANCE OF ORDER:This purchase order confirms a contract between the Parties on the terms of this purchase order and any other relevant document(s)as listed on its face.By acceptance of this purchase order andor performance here- under,Seller agrees to comply fully with the terms and conditions of sale set forth on both the front and reverse sides of this document,and any supplements hereto which are incorporated by a reference herein.Acceptance of this purchase order must be made on its exact terms and if additional or different terms are proposed by the Seller,such response will constitute a counteroffer and no contract shall come into existence without GVEA's written consent to the counteroffer.Seller represents that all goods supplied are free and clear from all claims and liens of any nature whatsoever.Nothing in this order or acceptance shal!be construed to make Seller an employee or agent of GVEA.This purchase order together with any relevant documents or attachments to it constitutes the entire agreement between the parties.Any deviation from this agreement must be accepted in writing by GVEA. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE:Final inspection of goods and services shall be upon GVEA's premises unless otherwise agreed in writing.Any acceptance of goods is subject to inspection within a reasonable time after receipt.Payment of the invoice does not constitute inspection or acceptance of materiais covered by the order,and GVEA reserves the right to inspect the goods before payment.If, upon inspection,any goods are found to be unsatisfactory,defective,or of inferior quality or workmanship,or fail to meet the specifications furnished or the re- quirements stated in the purchase order,GVEA may return such goods to Seller at the Seller's sole risk and expense,including the cost for handling and transport- ation,inspection,and any other charge connected with noncompliance of the purchase order. SHIPPING:Ail shipments and routing shall comply with the directions on the face of this purchase order or,in the absence of specific shipping instructions,goods shall be shipped FOB destination via the most economical means available.All transportation,shipping and forwarding charges must be prepaid unless other- wise indicated on the purchase order.GVEA reserves the right to refuse any and all shipments with collect charges.Seller shall notify GVEA of shipments within sufficient time to permit GVEA to arrange for unloading,and any claim for de- murrage resulting from Seller's failure to comply shall be paid by the Seller.Seller shall bear the risk of timely delivery of shipments in route.The risk of loss shall remain with the Seller until delivery of goods into GVEA's possession at desti- nation,subject to Seller responsibility for adequate packaging. WARRANTY:The Seiler warrants articles supplied on this purchase order to conform to specifications stated herein and to be fit and sufficient for the purpose manufactured,of good material and workmanship,and in the absence of other applicable express or implied warranty specifying a longer period,free from defects for a minimum period of twelve (12)months from delivery to GVEA.This warranty shall survive any inspection,delivery or acceptance of the goods or services,or payment therefore by GVEA.Seller further warrants that Seller shall comply with the requirements of all applicable federal,state and local laws,rules. ordinances and regulations,such as,but not limited to OSHA,Hazardous Materials Transportation Act,Toxic Substances Control Act and Consumer Product Safety Act. CHANGES/CANCELLATION:GVEA may require changes to this order at any time and written modification shall be made as necessary with allowance for increased cost,date of delivery,or other matters affected by the change(s). GVEA may,at it's option,cancel any unshipped merchandise previously ordered. subject to the obligation to pay for merchandise shipped prior to cancellation If the purchase order covers merchandise manufactured or fabricated to specifications of GVEA,Seller shail discontinue all performance on the subject matter,except as otherwise directed,immediately upon receiving notice of such cancellation In ithe event of such cancellation,and providing Seller is not in default,GVEA shall pay to Seller: a)The cost incurred by Seller in connection with this order prior to notice of cancellation;or b)Such other costs,including cancellation charges under subcontract.as GVEA may have approved. The total cancellation payment,plus previous payments,shall not exceed the total price of this order.Upon such payment,at GVEA's option,title to any materials or uncompleted merchandise shall pass to GVEA. REMEDIES/WAIVER:Time is of the essence of this order,and in the event that performance or delivery is not timely,GVEA reserves the right to cancel.purchase elsewhere,and/or hold Seller accountable for resulting costs and damages in curred.Seller shall promptly notify GVEA of any event that threatens to delay performance or delivery. Any waiver by GVEA of any breach or defauit shall not be deemed continuing oF applicable to other breach or default. 10. 11. 12, 13, 14, 15. THIRD PARTY CONTRACT/ASSIGNMENT:Neither this order nor any rights and obligations under it shail be assigned or contracted to third parties by Seller without the prior written consent of GVEA.GVEA shail promptly be furnished with written notice and a signed copy of any assignment.Any claim for payment by Assignees shall be subject to those defenses and set-offs which GVEA may have against Seller.Seller shall insure that any third party contract and.or assignment shall incorporate the provisions of this order by specific reference hereto INDEMNIFICATION:Seller shall indemnify GVEA for any loss,claim,damages, liability,expense (including reasonable attorney's fees)of any cause of actionwhatsoeverarisingoutofanyactoromissionoftheSeller,its agents,employees orsubcontractors.Seller shail maintain such public liability,property damage,em- ployee liability and compensation insurance as to protect GVEA from any said risks and from any claims under any applicable workers'compensation and occu- pational disease acts. GVEA reserves the right to require that it be named as an additional insured on Seller's insurance policies,that certificates of such insurance coverage be fur- nished upon request and that such additional insurance as it deems necessary be provided. The Seller agrees to defend,at its expense,GVEA and GVEA's employees,or any others using the product of GVEA,and hold them harmless,with respect to any and ail claims that the products or materials furnished by the Seller under this order infringe any United States andor foreign patent,trademark,copyright and or other property right of third parties. BUY AMERICAN:Seller shall adhere to the "Buy American”requirement of REA Bulletin 43-9.Any deviations from this requirement must be approved in writing by GVEA's purchasing agent. LABOR AGREEMENTS:It is understood and agreed that the Seller shall abide by GVEA's project labor agreements if work at the jobsite is required in this order. SERVICES:Seller and GVEA understand and agree that all ''services”con- templated by this agreement and provided by Seller to GVEA shall have the same complete and entire meaning as the word "goods”in application of the Uniform Commercial Code.All warranties as provided for by application of the Uniform Commercial Code,including implied warranties of merchantabililty and fitness for a particular purpose,shall apply to any and all services provided by Seller to GVEA as provided for in this agreement.Any and all other warranties,whether written or oral,statutory,express or implied,provided by Seller to GVEA shall apply to the services specified in this Agreement. FEDERAL LAWS,ORDERS AND REGULATIONS:GVEA and ali subcontractors, vendors,and suppliers agree and certify that they shall comply with the re- quirernent of ail pertinent federal laws,orders and regulations inc!uding but not limited to Executive Order 112461,as amended,and the regulations at 41 CFR 60-1 through 60-60,at 41 CFR 60-250 and 60-741 and Sections 38 USC 2012 503. CHOICE OF LAW:Any civil action arising from this purchase order shall be brought in the Fourth Judicial District for the State of Alaska.The laws of the State of Alaska shall govern the rights and the obligations of the parties under this purchase order. LOBBYING DISCLOSURE:Any contract or subcontract which exceeds $100,000 shalt comply with Federal Law,which governs this contract,and requires that all contractors and any subcontractors comply with the following: No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behaif of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with theawardingofanyFederalcontract,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the exten- s10Nn,continuation or renewal,amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant,loan or cooperative agreement. tf any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or emplovee of any agency.a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress.or an em- ployee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract.grant,loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shali complete and submit Stan-dard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,”in accordance with its instructions.* By acceptance of this contract with GVEA,you are certifying that you are in compliance with this federal requirement.If you are required to complete Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,”you must suomit ths form to GVEA at the time this contract is entered into. WAIVER OF RIGHT TO FILE LIENS:Seller hereby agrees not to file any Mechanics, !aborers',or materiaimen's lien or other lien against any GVEA premises or any part thereof on account of any services or goods furnished under this order or any additions or addenda to this order.Seller hereby waives the right to fe ary suchlien.and shall,if requested,execute a waiver of lien in recordable form -*avor of GVEA and the premises.Seller shali insure that any third party contract and or assignment shall incorporate the provisions of this purchase order hy specific reference to these terms and conditions. SEVERABILITY:The invalidity in whole or in part of any condition of ths purchase order shalt not effect the validity of the other conditions.The remedies #served in these terms and conditions shall be cumulative and additional to any "er ties in law or equity. =Sieeeeeeatemeawauga4PoCINOe m -. e tea"ie u xLq17TN7athasTescrac\: Osibeili 6:25 Peak - Poa . Mod\E >< Tyi a 2.Wre32-5| ISTING Hbuntain "esi _ee eeHINES-7>CREEK"> o B-7" IMa-144.6 PG NER II»MOEN ATEN YSIS2 Hb BA EEN LEN SEI EARNS SAE HN. >wanneck "sy , (EXxIs :kY TRANS SION LINE? 7 Taf iy # a ,La if”BE."t dp.Sita G4 pp 3 DK oe Ee YS ,a p a).-s ee Ga VE LZ, v EY]; et "EN 4ny'Pp orgYo.1 Parks ee NeHighway Link 3 27.0 miles 12.5 miles K NENANARIVERParks Hignway SCALE 14:250,000 s tC.x ( Healy Substation a /Vv Ti -DRAWINGS NO.IDRYDEN A ILalRuc ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITYCONSULTINGENGINEERSPROSSEDHEALY-FAIRSANKS iNTESTIE DATE?01/08/94 SOUTH ROUTEBiORSaoe A -& GY aad GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC.Box 71249,Fairbanks,Alaska 99707-1249,Phone 907-452-1151 February 16,1994 Shannon and Wilson,Inc. 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks AK 99709 Attention:Rohn Abbott Re:Request for Proposal -Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigations In our Request-for-Proposal dated February 10,1994,we stated that the notice-to-proceed date for Phase II of the GeotechnicalInvestigationswouldcommenceafterthefinalalignmenthadbeendeterminedandthestructureshavebeenlocatedinthefield. By this letter,we are amending the start date for Phase II to take advantage of the 1994-1995 winter season.We now plan to give the notice-to-proceed prior to centerline staking and clearing,which should be about October or November of 1994,after the alignment has been finalized.Horizontal locations will be provided for all angle points and it will be the consultant's responsibility to ensure that bore holes are along the centerline.Final reports will still need to be completed prior to construction in September 1995. Sincerely, CLA Steven Haagenson Manager of Engineering Services oyy GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC.Box 71249,Fairbanks,Alaska 99707-1249,Phone 907-452-1151 February 23,1994 Tom Stahr,IPG Chairman Municipal Light and Power 1200 East First Avenue Anchorage,Alaska 99501 Recommendation on Geotechnical Investigation Proposal HEALY TO FAIRBANKS TRANSMISSION INTERTIE Dear Tom: Golden Valley Electric Association,Inc.Engineering Department requested proposals for the supply of geotechnical investigations from five consultants.We have completed evaluation of the submitted proposals and would like to offer a recommendation for acceptance of the Golder and Associates of Anchorage,Alaska (Golder)proposal. The attached evaluation form was created for the five proposals received to allow for a fair comparison based on experience, ability to perform,man-hour effort,and price.Of all the proposals,was felt to provide the best value,local experience, and realistic view of the tasks to be performed. Phucan Consulting provided a hastily prepared proposal which did not provide a approach for construction.Experience was good,but most of the transmission line experience was on the rocky northern portion of the intertie which has had several foundation problems. The selection of Golder and Associates was primarily based on the team's superior value demonstrated by their arctic experience in substation design and construction management of successful projects,local Alaskan design team with the ability to provide timely services,and realistic price.The following shows the ranking for design and construction management based on price alone: Proposer Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phucan Consultant Golder &Assoc. R&M Consultants DOWL Engineers Shannon and Wilson UNWPReUBWNOeWNhe GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC. Tom Stahr Page 2 February23,1994 Would you please review the evaluation forms.The Golder and Associates proposal is attached for your review.If you need additional information or would like to review any other proposals, please call me at (907)451-5647.The design firms are anxiously awaiting announcement of our selection and notice to proceed to allow for commencement of work. Sincerely, a8 Steven Haagenson,P.E. Manager of Engineering Services SHsmmf£ Enclosures HF138GEE.XLS 22-Feb-94 Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigation Proposals $ P Total R Proposers General Local Schedule/Staffing Man-hours H Projected Cost a Comments Experience Experience (ability to start to A per proposal n of Firm By the Proposed soon and maintain Complete S_including 10 %k Team schedule)Project E Contingency Phukan good no 10%on Helicopter Phase 1 $51,700 or Phase 2 $118,400. Consultanting good AF Intertie north 1/2 good 523 1 $113,810.00 1 Anchorage Based Engineers (rocky end of line)1,056 2 $240,780.00 1 CEA 230 kV line &10%$18,449.00 **estimated $totals do not match sums station Est $102490 +$218345 =$320,835. 1,579 NTE $373,039.00 1 <===sum =$373,039. Golder Associates good some good 1,825 1 $204,895.00 4 [Anchorage Based Bradley transmission 3,701 2 $278,409.00 2 line 10%$48,330.40 AF intertie recon study 5,526 NTE $531,634.40 2 R&M excellent Consultants good HF 138 kV line good 902 1 $192,276.00 3 |Fairbanks Based SCADA micro tower 1,393 2 $369,020.00 3 Bradley Lake trans.10%$56,129.60 2.295 NTE $617,425.60 3 DOWL Engineers good some good 1,130 1 $190,575.00 2 Anchorage Based Quartz Creek Sub 1,924 2 $384,770.00 4 Denali VAC 10%$57,534.50 only lab in State certified by AASHTO 3,054 NTE $632,879.50 4 Shannon &excellent Wilson good intertie maint.good 2,149 1 $225,825.00 5 |Fairbanks Based Inc.Ft Knox 138 kv line 4,497 2 $534,595.00 5 HCCP 10%$76,042.00 6,646 NTE $836,462.00 5 Paje 1 HF138GEE.XLS 22-Feb-94 Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie Geotechnical Investigation Proposals 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 0.00 DESIGN Project Data Design Geol.Soils Fdn/Drill Field Final Expenses Man Costs perAdmin|Review |Criteria |Mapping |_Boring |Anchor |Sample |Reports |Report |Hours Proposal Phukan Phase 1 23 24 12 40 52 44 212 50 66 523 Consultanting MHs &Costs $2,010 $1,800 $960 $2,700 $3,640 $3,080 $26,500 $3,500 $4,620 $65,000 $113,810.00 Phase 2 48 48 24 88 104 88 420 104 132 1056 MHs &Costs $3,360 $3,600 $1,840 $5,920 $7,280 $6,160 $52,500 $7,280 $9,240 $143,600 $240,780.00 1,579 $354,590.00 Golder Phase 1 40 24 28 103 21 64 1093 208 244 1825 Associates MHs &Costs $4,560 $2,800 $3,160 $20,226 $2,320 $6,700 $116,704 $23,105 $25,320 $0 (2592509 Phase 2 80 24 28 68 21 103 2,829 304 244 3701 MHs &Costs $9,120 $2,800 $3,160 $9,610 $2,320 $10,720 $172,349 $43,010 $25,320 $0 $278,409.00 5,526 $483,304.00 R&M Phase 1 56 46 31 114 16 113 265 89 172 902 Consultants MHs &Costs $5,500 $3,941 $2,375 $7,179 $1,124 $8,977 $15,644 $6,070 $12,020 $129,446 ) $192,276.00 Phase 2 88 ce)22 48 32 65 743 227 168 1393 MHs &Costs $9,080 $0 $1,670 $3,177 $2,248 $5,356 $43,912 $15,310 $11,880 $276,387 $369,020.00 2.295 $561,296.00 DOWL Phase 1 60 80 36 90 158 100 346 110 150 1130 Engineers MHs &Costs $5,400 $6,000 $3,220 $6,250 $10,510 $8,100 $22,070 $8,150 $11,350 $109,525 $190,575.00 Phase 2 80 60 60 60 264 160 760 200 280 1924 MHs &Costs $7,200 $5,300 $5,300 $5,300 $16,520 $13,100 $47,300 $14,950 $21,100 $248,700 $384,770.00 3.054 $575,345.00 Shannon &Phase 1 90 131 52 197 14 146 1175 106 238 2149 Wilson MHs &Costs $7,600 $8,760 $3,935 $12,035 $1,010 $10,470 $64,475 $6,325 $16,235 $94,980 $225,825.00 Phase 2 166 40 30 93 54 149 3,332 205 428 4497 MHs &Costs $13,840 $2,510 $2,390 $5,740 $3,790 $10,695 $172,210 $12,220 $26,950 $284,250 $534,595.00 6.646 $760,420.00 Page 2 BY GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC. PROPOSAL FOR HEALY TO FAIRBANKS 230KV INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GolderLfAssociates February 1994 February 22,1994 PR3-5606 Golden Valley Electric Association Inc.Box 71249 Fairbanks,Alaska 99707 Attention:Mr.Steven Haagenson RE:PROPOSAL FOR HEALY TO FAIRBANKS 230 kV INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Dear Mr.Haagenson: Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this proposal for you to perform a geotechnicalinvestigationfortheHealytoFairbanks230kVIntertie.We believe this a challenginggeotechnicalandlogisticalproject.In preparing this proposal,we have attempted to provide themostcosteffective,technically appropriate geotechnical engineering investigation possible.Whenyoureviewourproposal,we believe that you will want to select Golder Associates to performthisworkforthefollowingsalientreasons: 1.Our staff and our drillers are ready to begin work for you immediately upon your noticetoproceed; We have worked along the route and in the surrounding area; We have worked on many similar projects; Our key staff has a history of working with your designer; Our drilling program is cost effective and potentially easy to permit;anfWwNOur key staff are located in Anchorage. Again thank you for the opportunity to prepare this proposal.If you have any questions,pleasecontactus,we would be pleased to discuss any aspect of the proposal or the project with you. Sincerely, cai cali INC.a LZ doRupertG.Tart,Jr.,P.E.Principal &Manager'Alaska Operations RGT/plb D/F:RGT-94/56060222 PRO February 22,1994 -i-PR3-5606 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.INTRODUCTION ......00.ee eee eee eee ee tenet e tent n tenes 1 2.PROJECT APPROACH ........ccc ccc cece eee ee ete tent eee eta 22.1 Initial Layout of the Transmission Line ........2...cece eee eee eee 22.2 Geologic Mapping and Borehole Location Selection .............-eseeeue 32.2 Field Drilling Program ........cece cece eee eee e eee teen ene eeee 4 2.3 Laboratory Testing ........0.cece cece cee eee eee eee eee teen ne nees 5 24 Engineering Analyses ......0...cece cee cee e eee een teen een eee eens 5 2.5 Phase 1 Report .......00.c ccc c eee cece cece eee eee eee ee en te tence 62.6 Phase 2Approach ......cece cece cece ee ee tee eee eee tent e tence nes 7 3.TASK DESCRIPTIONS .....0...ce ccc ete etree teen etnies 83.1 Task 1.0 -Project Administration .......0.cece cee eee e ee eee e eee nee 83.2 Task 2.0 -Data Review ....2...cc cece eee eee e teens 8 3.3.Task 3.0 -Study Design Criteria...2...ccc cee ec eet eee ens 8 3.4 Tasks 4.0 &4.1 -Geologic Mapping ..........cece cece eee nent e ences 93.5 Task 5.0 -Soils Boring Locations And Data ...........ce eee cree eee e eens 103.6 Tasks 6.0 -Foundation/Anchor Type .........cece eee cence een eeenees 113.7.Task 7.0,7.1,7.2,&7.3 -Drilling and Sampling Methods ...............-.12 3.8 Tasks 8.0 &8.1 -Field and Laboratory Testing Reports .............5--0-13 3.9 Task 9.0 -Final Report Phase 1.1.1...eecteeeeeetees 13 4.ESTIMATED COSTS ........0...c ccc cee eee eee en ee eens 15 5.SCHEDULE .......cece cc eee ee eee ee tent e eee e teen eens 17 6.PROPOSED KEY STAFF .........0.0.ccc e cece tee eee entree ee neees 18 7.FIRM EXPERIENCE .........2...cece cece cee ee eee een eet e eee nees 20 FIGURES RESUMES SAMPLE PROJECTS PHASE 1 -PROJECT DETAIL PHASE 2 -PROJECT DETAIL Golder Associates February 22,1994 -ii-PR3-5606 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) List of Figures 1 -Proposed Boring Locations 2 -Estimate Cost 3 -Proposed Man-hour Distribution 4 -Proposed Unit Rates 5 -Proposed Phase 1 and Phase 2 Schedule 6 -Proposed Organization Chart 7 -Recent Project Work Samples List of Resumes Robert L.Burk Robert G.Dugan 'Mark R.Musial Rupert G.Tart,Jr. Steven R.Thompson List of Sample Alaskan Projects 1.Alaska Department of Transportation &Public Facilities Nenana Canyon Landslide and Erosion Study -Denali National Park,Alaska 2 Anchorage-Fairbanks Intertie -Healy-Fairbanks,Alaska3ARRCTunnelRehabilitation-Whittier,Alaska 4 Bradley Lake Intertie Investigation -Homer,Alaska 5.Bridge 355.0 -Healy Canyon,Alaska 6.Garner Tunnel Evaluation -Healy Canyon,Alaska 7 Geotechnical Investigation and Dynamic Pile Load Testing -Valdez,Alaska 8 Mile 350 Blasting -Near Healy,Alaska 9.Municipality of Anchorage Pavement Heave Study -Anchorage,Alaska10.|Municipality of Anchorage Sullivan Arcna Rink Floor Repair -Anchorage,Alaska11.Railbed Soil Sampling Alaska Railroad -Seward to Fairbanks,Alaska12.Regional Drilling Waste Disposal Siting (nteria Development -Prudhoe Bay,Alaska 13.Slope Instrumentation -Trans Alaska Iipeline,Alaska14.|Thaw Settlement Mitigation Trans Alaska Pipeline -Squirrel Creek,Alaska15.Usibelli Coal Mine Geotechnica/H ydrologncal Investigations -Healy,Alaska16.Valdez Creek Mine Slide Monitonny and Slope Stabilization -Near Cantwell,Alaska Golder Associates February 22,1994 -1-PR3-5606 1.INTROD ON This proposal has been developed to provide geotechnical data along the planned Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie.The route is generally parallel to the Parks Highway and the existing 138 kV Anchorage to Fairbanks Intertie.The new intertie as planned will avoid both of these existing right of ways.It will cross undeveloped land with limited access for most of its length. Therefore,this project will be a significant logistics challenge.In this proposal we have concentrated much of our effort on the drilling program and other programs that can supplement and enhance this part of our study.We believe we have developed a workable program that will provide the geotechnical data and recommendations to efficiently design and construct the intertie. Our approach,a detailed description of the tasks we have planned,our costs,and our proposed schedule are presented in the following four sections of this proposal.In the last two of the proposal we have discussed our proposed staffing for this project and our firm experience. Appendices present resumes of our proposed staff,description of many of our recent Alaskan geotechnical projects,and details of the project plans we have developed for this proposal. Golder Associates February 22,1994 ae PR3-5606 2.PROJECT APPROACH Our approach to siting transmission line projects is based on viewing Golder as a team member along with the transmission line designer and Golden Valley.By working closely with the designer and Golden Valley,throughout the project,we can help ensure that design,and future operationsand maintenance issues are considered at the appropriate time.We have already established this working relationship with the designer and we expect that it will assist us in providing the most cost-effective product to Golden Valley.Often cost is the controlling factor in developing siting criteria.However,when cost is not the apparent controlling factor,costs can be assigned to other factors such as right-of-way concerns,geotechnical constraints,topographic constraints,and environmental issues.Assigning ranges of costs to these issues,assists in tracking siting decisions on a rational basis. Our team members have performed numerous siting studies in Alaska and throughout the world for powerlines,pipelines,waterlines,waste facilities,dam structures,missile sites,and other structures and facilities.In each of these studies our primary role has been the geotechnical assessment of the route or site.In most cases the preferred geotechnical route could not always be used.Therefore,it has always been important to work with the design team to balance the -*+4mportance of each siting criteria issue.This has been done using decision matrices and other techniques to keep the design team focused on all aspects of the siting process. In the following subsections of this proposal we will present our step by step approach to performing the geotechnical assessment of the Healy to Fairbanks 230 kV Intertie through Phases 1 and 2.This section will present the flow of information as we see it being developed.Later in the proposal we will address each of the tasks you have defined for Phase 1 and Phase 2 and show how our approach fits into those tasks. 2.1 Initial Layout of the Transmission Line This is usually performed by the designer and frequently one of our geologists or geotechnical engineers will assist with this route selection.In your RFP the initial route has been presented. In addition,no subsurface data has been acquired and winter access is preferred to minimize Golder Associates February 22,1994 -3-PR3-5606 environmental impact of the geotechnical boring program.Thus,in Phase 1 of this study the route provided in the RFP will be the route that is assessed. 2.2 logic Mapping and Borehol tion Selection Some basic geologic mapping was provided in the RFP.In this proposal we have selected 25 proposed boring locations based on this mapping and other more detailed mapping from our files.In developing these boring locations we have attempted to select boring locations that would help us more precisely define the engineering characteristics and limits of the mapped geologic units. Additional published information is available as are high altitude (lin =1mi)false color infra-red photography.Other aerial photography may be available for portions of the route.This existing information will be studied in detail by our geologists using a high power stereo zoom transferscope.The boring locations we have presented in our proposal will be reviewed after the aerial image analysis and may be adjusted after consultation with the designer. Once the final Phase 1 boring locations are selected and agreed upon,latitudes and longitudes will be developed for each boring.A GPS will be used with a helicopter to locate each boring. The accuracy is expected to be plus or minus about 300 ft.Each boring will be flagged and flagged PVC casings will be left at each boring upon completion.With this flagging and marking, the GPS should provide adequate accuracy for Phase 1.Additional accuracy (+2-5 meters)could be provided by having a survey team use a Trimble GPS Master Receiver with a Rover.This additional surveying,if done in conjunction with the drilling program,would add about $15,000 to the cost of Phase 1. At this point we would usually recommend that the designer and a geologist or geotechnical engineer inspect the route by helicopter to verify the office interpretations.However,because snow cover would severely limit aerial viewing at this time,we have proposed to wait until the __end of the drilling program when the snow cover is gone. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -4-| PR3-5606 2.2 Field Drilling Program The field drilling program for Phase 1 will consist of drilling 25 borings to an average depth of approximately 35 ft.The field program will be directed by our field manager who will locate each boring using a helicopter and GPS prior to the rig coming on location.The depths of the borings may be adjusted in the field by our geologist or geotechnical engineer if appropriate. To make our program more efficient and less likely to result in environmental impacts,we plan to drill most of the Phase 1 borings using a helicopter transported rig.The rig we plan to use has been specifically designed for helicopter use with light weight easy to assemble modules and sufficient power to air rotary drill at least 50 ft in dense or stiff soils. The rig will have the following sampling equipment as a minimum: 1.SPT standard and 3 in.O.D.split tube drive samplers 2.140 and 300 lbs drive hammers 3.Shelby tubes for unfrozen clay or other soft soils 4.Modified Shelby Tubes for frozen silts and clays Each boring will be sampled at 5 ft intervals.In granular soils,penetration tests will be conducted using the Standard Penetration Test procedure or a modification of that procedure to accommodate the particle sizes and other conditions encountered.Frozen soils will be sampled with a Modified Shelby barrel sampler and will be weighed and measured in the field for dry density determinations.Some frozen samples will be stored frozen for thaw consolidation testing. Others will be allowed to thaw and will be used for moisture content testing and classification testing. Pocket Penetrometer and Torvane tests will be conducted on intact samples that are obtained. When samples are allowed to thaw,these tests will be conducted before and after thawing. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -5-PR3-5606 2.3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory testirtg will be used to aid in the characterization of the engineering properties of each geologic unit we investigate.Classification,moisture content,thaw consolidation,and dry density determinations will be the key laboratory testing categories.For Phase 1 we do not recommend costly strength testing,such as triaxial shear,because we believe that the field tests we have proposed give results that are much more representative of the actual insitu soil conditions.As Phase 2 is developed,other specific laboratory tests may be recommended if we can demonstrate that they would aid us in understanding the strength properties that will control the design of the tower supports. 2.4 Engineering Analyses The key to successful tower foundations is the close coordination and cooperation of the geotechnical engineers and the designer so that they can synergistically optimize the design while addressing each of the appropriate concerns. This project has a very unique opportunity to take advantage of information that is frequently not available for this type of project.The existing intertie is,in many ways,similar to the proposed intertie and passes through many of the same geologic units.The performance of foundations of the existing intertie should give us a good base for identifying potential problem areas for the new intertie foundations.\We have proposed a significant effort to make this evaluation.In Phase 1 we will field check some of the problem foundations on the existing intertie and make extensive use of any records available from Golden Valley. In Phase 1 the engineering analyses will tecus on determining which properties in each geologic unit will control the design of the tower toundations.In areas near Healy,landslides may affect some tower locations and shallow bedr«k may control the construction of the foundations. Particular attention will be given to landslide issues because of the history of problems in this area.We have developed practical engincenng solutions for numerous landslides in this area including along the Parks Highway.Nearer to Fairbanks permafrost concerns may control design,particularly if the construction of the powerline could result in ground thermal reyime Golder Associates February 22,1994 -6-PR3-5606 changes.In most areas the active layer and the resulting heave and variation in lateral restraint will be a concern that will be addressed.This phase of the work will have to be conducted in close consultation with the designer so that no time will be wasted developing concepts that cannot be readily accommodated. During the analyses we will work with the designer to develop appropriate foundation types for each geologic unit encountered.We will then set criteria for establishing the geotechnical properties that will be used in the design of these foundations.Because there will inevitably be route adjustments,we will assess the lateral variability of the engineering geologic units selected. As we assess the lateral capacity of piles,we will be using LPILE to perform these analyses.In the past we have frequently used COM624,the predecessor to LPILE.Both programs were developed by associates of Dr.Lyman C.Reese and are designed to determine the lateral restraint provided by multiple layers of soils.In many cases in Alaska the lateral resistance change with the seasons is significant.We will use LPILE to perform parametric studies to bound the strength variations we determine may be possible.We will design and modify our field testing program to realistically develop the appropriate soil properties for use in these analyses. 2.5 Phase 1 Report Phase 1 will end with a report of our findings and conclusions.It will contain the following information: 1.A description of the work performed 2.Details of drilling and testing programs 3.A geologic map of the powerline alignment 4.Boring and geologic unit soil property profiles 5.Recommended foundation types 6.Recommended foundation design procedures 7.Recommended criteria for Phase 2 investigations Golder Associates February 22,1994 .7-PR3-5606 2.6 Phase 2 Approach Phase 2 will be ued to provide more definition to the geotechnical features and foundation types to maximize project cost effectiveness.We believe that Phase 2 should be performed as a continuation of Phase 1.There are some tasks that should be accomplished before next fall and new snow cover.The project geologist and project geotechnical engineer should closely review the output of the DVG survey.This may result in the identification of a need for an additional helicopter inspection of the route concentrating on specific locations for tower foundations.It is critical that this work be done in the summer.This work would also be very helpful in optimizing the locations of the Phase 2 borings and in developing specific field test programs that may be appropriate for some types foundations. At this time further definition of Phase 2 would be dependent on the results of Phase 1.In the Task by Task description of the our proposed work we have scoped out a plan for Phase 2 which we believe will be the most that would be required for Phase 2.We believe that through close coordination with you and the designer we will be able to modify and optimize Phase 2 geotechnical work. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -8-PR3-5606 3.TASK DESCRIPTIONS This proposal ha§been developed to follow the major tasks that were outlined in your RFP.We have proposed our approach in the preceding paragraphs and we propose to implement this approach according to the schedules presented as Figure 1.These schedules show your tasks as we have modified and scheduled them using Microsoft Project.In appendices tabbed "Phase 1 Project Detail"and "Phase 2 Project Detail”,the Microsoft Project Printouts have been included to give you the cost and resource detail for each task. 3.1 Task 1.0 -Project Administration This task will consist of the initial meetings with you and the designer and the preparation of monthly progress reports and other administrative information that you may request.We do not expect thatithis will be a task that will consume a significant amount of time since we have planned to work closely with the designer as we go through the other tasks,keeping him up to date on what we are doing. 3.2 Task 2.0 -Data Review In our approach we consider this to be one of the more important tasks.There is a substantial amount of geologic and engineering data available near and along the proposed intertie route. We have worked in this area for the Alaska Railroad,Alaska DOT/PF,and Usibelli Coal Mine and therefore we are aware of some of the information available from these sources.The most important information,we believe,will be the performance history data from the existing intertie; the geotechnical data from the existing intertie;the available geologic data;and aenal photography.All of this information will be reviewed and summarized in our Phase 1 report. 3.3 Task 3.0 -Study Design Criteria _In this task we will review the specific boring locations,the anticipated foundation types,and other available information with the designer.We have proposed our approach to the Phase 1 Golder Associates February 22,1994 -9-° PR3-5606 drilling program.We would use this task to review and,as appropriate adjust that program prior to going into the field. '3.4 Tasks 4.0 &4.1 -Geologic Mapping Prior to drilling,geologic research and mapping will be conducted to identify and delineate the landforms traversed by the proposed powerline alignment.As elements of the landscape,each landform has a definite composition and range of physical,vegetative,geotechnical and visual attributes that occur wherever the landform exists.Because of the large body of geotechnical test data which was correlated to landforms along the nearby Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS), we will use the TAPS landform classification system.This system groups landforms on the basis of genesis,with the rationale that similar geologic processes result in landforms with similar engineering properties that present similar engineering problems. US Geological Survey (USGS)reports,geologic maps and stereo analysis of aerial photographs will be used to aid the landform delineation.Geologic reports will be reviewed to determine the limits of glaciation,bedrock properties,permafrost distribution,thermal regime,Quaternary geology,and other geologic aspects relevant to the powerline alignment. Some of the alignment is covered at a scale of 1 inch =1 mile by USGS geologic maps.1986 false color infrared photos cover the entire alignment.Using the USGS maps as a guide,the landforms will be delineated on acetate overlays of the aerial photographs and transferred to USGS topographic base maps.Geologic hazards such as active and inactive landslide zones and permafrost zones will also be delineated. In addition,available geotechnical data from material sites and boreholes on adjacent portions of the Parks Highway will be obtained from the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF).Because the Parks Hiyhway crosses similar terrain near the proposed powerline,these logs will provide information on surface and subsurface conditions which will correlate well with the corresponding landforms on the powerline route.Other existing borehole data from Golder Valley Electric Association and Usibelli Coal Mine will be used if available and relevant to the landforms traversed by the powerline route. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -10-PR3-5606 A preliminary geologic strip map of the alignment will be prepared at a scale of 1 inch =1 mile. The map will be annotated as necessary to identify hazards,slope,and economic considerations. In our Microsoft Project detail and in our costs we have included a task which was not requested, but which we feel is very important in the development of our understanding of the geology of this route.We propose a two day geologic helicopter reconnaissance immediately after the drilling program is completed,if snow cover permits.During this reconnaissance our geologists or engineer would fly with the powerline designer to refine our geologic and engineering interpretations of route.This would also help in identifying criteria for future borings and the planned DVG survey. 3.5 Task 5.0 -Soils Boring Locations And Data Phase 1 boreholes will be selected in order to characterize the landforms as a whole rather than to investigate specific locations.Based on the geologic map provided in the RFP,we have developed the following table to show the length of the powerline alignment that traverses each of the mapped geologic units on the map.We have assumed for the purposes of this selection that each geologic unit is a landform. Geologic Cumulative Number of Unit Miles Boreholes Qs 9.1 2 Teb 2.1 1 Tn 178 5 Qaf 19 1 Mt 25 1 QI (landslide)v4 0 Qha 13 1 Qtf m1 1 Qab 22.5 4 Qa 123 3 be 1]1 Qsu 1345 3 'Qf 12 2 Totals 8 3 25 Golder Associates February 22,1994 -11-PR3-5606 The 25 boreholes were approximately apportioned to each landform based on the landform's cumulative length.At least one borehole was designated to each major geologic unit.The approximate preliminary locations of these boreholes are shown on Figure 1.Borehole locations will be refined based on interpretation of aerial photographs prior to drilling.Final boreholes locations will be determined based on considerations of slope orientation,slope angle,permafrost, vegetation,drainage,slope stability,and other factors._ Phase 2 boreholes will be selected to confirm landform boundaries and will also likely include some specific locations such as points of intersection,or areas with questionable.sub-surface conditions. The latitude and longitude of each proposed borehole will be determined based on plotting the locations on a USGS base map.The boreholes will be located and staked in the field by helicopter using air photos and Global Positioning System (GPS)instruments.We typically expect an accuracy of 300 ft or better with the GPS. We have discussed higher accuracy surveys with surveyors from USKH.For an additional cost of about $15,000 a survey team working with our drill crew could increase the accuracy of each hole location to +2 to 5 meters using a GPS master receiver in conjunction with a roving receiver. 3.6 Tasks 6.0 -Foundation/Anchor Type A number of different foundation and anchor systems will be developed which are appropnate for the particular terrain units identified during the field mapping/exploration.Consideration will be given to the following design and construction criteria: °Axial loading conditions (compression and uplift) °Lateral loading conditions .Heave forces (including capability to resist heave forces and to iraae adjustments as necessary to accommodate heave) Golder Associates February 22,1994 -12-PR3-5606 °Liquefaction potential in floodplain areas °Constraints on construction equipment imposed by access routes .Constraints on construction scheduling imposed by access conditions Typical terrain units and associated foundation/anchor types might include the following: Shallow bedrock -Footing foundations with tie-downs;grouted rock anchors. .Competent soil -Short H-pile foundations;screw anchors or grouted soil anchors. .Soft/loose soil -Long H-pile foundations;screw anchors or driven pile anchors. °Frozen soil -Pre-drilled H-pile,drilled pipe pile,or drilled concrete pier foundations;grouted soil anchors,pre-drilled screw anchors,or pre-drilled pile anchors.Thermal modification may be considered to improve installation conditions. As we assess the lateral capacity of piles,we will be using LPILE to perform these analyses.In the past we have frequently used COM624,the predecessor to LPILE.Both programs were developed by associates of Dr.Lyman C.Reese and are designed to determine the lateral restraint provided by multiple layering of soils.In many cases in Alaska the lateral resistance change with the seasons is significant.We will use LPILE to perform parametric studies to bound the strength variations we determine may be possible.We will design and modify our field testing program to realistically develop the appropriate soil properties for use in these analyses. 3.7 Task 7.0,7.1,7.2,&7.3 -Drilling and Sampling Methods Drilling will be accomplished using a combination of track-mounted and heli-portable drill rigs. Boreholes accessible by the tracked-mounted will be drilled with a Mobile B-61 drill mounted on a Nodwell carrier using hollow-stem auger.Other boreholes will be drilled with a heli-portable drill using air rotary methods.We understand that Golden Valley will obtain appropriate rights of entry prior to the commencement of drilling for the access to,and the location of,each borehole. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -13-PR3-5606 Drive samples will be obtained with splitspoons driven with a 140 lb or 300 Ib safety hammer. Drive samples will be taken every 5 ft to a depth of 35 ft or refusal.Samples will be visually logged in the field and placed in moisture proof containers for shipment to the Golder soils laboratory.Particular attention will be paid to the depth of the water table and presence of visible ice.Frozen samples will be kept frozen. Our field crew will consist of a Golder geotechnical engineer or geologist who will supervise the drilling and log the borehole,a driller,and two drill helpers.One of the helpers will proceed ahead of the drilling operation with a chainsaw to clear drill sites.He will also help during ng moves as personnel are required on both ends of the slinging operation. Prior to backfilling,a 1 inch PVC casing will be installed in each borehole to provide a conduit for measuring ground temperatures.Thermistor strings will be temporarily installed in the casings to measure the ground temperatures. 3.8 Tasks 8.0 &8.1 -Field and Laboratory Testing Reports Laboratory testing will concentrate on classification,moisture determinations,dry density determinations,and thaw stability of saturated frozen strata.The details of the tests proposed are presented in the Microsoft Project Printouts in the appendices tabbed as "Phase 1 Project Detail”and "Phase 2 Project Detail". Results of all field and laboratory testing will be summarized in tables.Specific design parameters will be shown on profiles of each boring.To the extent practical we will develop "Design Profiles"for each geologic unit.It is possible that these profiles would result in standard foundation designs for given loads in each geologic unit. 3.9 Task 9.0 -Final Report Phase 1 In the final report we will detail all analyses and methods used to develop the foundation designs and recommendations that we will present to you.In this effort,as throughout the Golder Associates February 22,1994 -14-PR3-5606 study,we have elected to use our senior staff to prepare this report.We believe that this will bring more experience to the project and will be produce a more efficient product for you. This task would consist of the preparation and assembly of the final report which would include the following: 1.A description of the geotechnical study 2.Details of drilling and testing 3.A geologic map of the powerline alignment 4.Boring and geologic unit soil property profiles 5.Recommended foundation types 6.Recommended foundation design procedures 7.Recommended criteria for Phase 2 investigations Prior to submission of our final report we plan to have discussed in detail each of our recommendations with you and your designer so that our recommendations do not impose any unnecessary constraints or conditions on your project.In many cases we find that this process allows us to better understand your expectations and capabilities to address issues that we may identify during our work.We then are able to adjust our recommendations to better fit your specific needs. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -15- ) PR3-5606 4.ESTIMATED COSTS Microsoft Project was used to cost and schedule the work we have proposed.Phase 1 has been described and costed in detail.Phase 2 has been costed in detail with limited scope descriptions based on the assumption the tasks will be similar with levels of effort modified as we have shown.We believe that when Phase 1 is completed there will be changes in the Phase 2 scope which could result in substantial savings in cost.For example Phase 2 costing is based on another drilling program using 2 drills with one helicopter to bore 100 locations.We think the number of locations may change and,with adequate knowledge of the route and planning,some savings may be possible using a track-mounted drill for more of the borings. The total not-to-exceed cost for Phase 1 as proposed is $205,000.Of this $11,000 is for Task 4.1 which is beyond the scope of your RFP and could be eliminated,though we do not recommend that you do so.The total not-to-exceed cost estimated for Phase 2 is $278,000.The details of this estimate are presented in the appendix tabbed "Phase 2 Project Detail". All costs are time and materials at the rates shown on Figure 4 our "Schedule of 1994 Standard Rates"the Resources Table presented in the appendix tabbed "Phase 1 Project Detail”.Please note that for the cost estimate and for this project we have proposed a reduced rate of $130 per hour for the two Principals proposed on this project. The man-hour breakdowns and costs from the Microsoft Project Printouts have been transferred to your forms which are presented as Figures 2 and 3.In completing your man-hour breakdown table which is shown in Figure 2,we have presented hours for our Principal Engineer and Principal Geologist under your title Project Manager although neither will act as the project manager as will be discussed in Section 6 «1 this proposal.One of the Project Engineers assigned to the project will provide the day to day project management.The two Principals will provide senior technical guidance for the project and participate in specific project activities for which their experience and skills are required.I'lvase reter to our Project Detail for specifics. In this cost estimate we have assumed that vou would be able to provide rights of entry to each of the boring locations prior to the initiation ot our drilling program as laid out in the schedule Golder Associates February 22,1994 -16-PR3-5606 discussed in the next section of this proposal.This is very important because our drilling contractor costs are lump sum,based on a single mobilization and continuous access to the drill locations thereafter. If there are items in our cost estimate that do not reflect the level of effort you believe is necessary,whether too much or too little,we would be happy to sit down with you and discuss any changes you may desire.In the Project Detail appendices we have tried to provide the detail that you would need to assess our approach. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -17-PR3-5606 5.SCHEDULE In Figure 5 we have presented our proposed project schedules for Phase 1 and Phase 2 in conformance with the schedule deadlines presented in your RFP.Two significant points to note in our schedule are: 1.We are ready to begin immediately. 2."We-have a significant break between Phase 1 and Phase 2. The significant schedule break was our response to our understanding of your schedule requirements.We believe that immediate continuation of Phase 2 after Phase 1 would allow additional visual study of the route in summer which could result in a more effective and efficient drilling program for Phase 2.he . Le This schedule has been developed as part of our overall project plan on Microsoft Project.Detail dates of each proposed activity are presented in the Project Detail appendices.This plan is based on our understanding of your project as of today.As you know with the Project program this plan can be modified easily and adjusted to fit your needs.We are veryWilling to work with you to speed up or lengthen the schedule and work with you to make this an efficient and well planned project for you. As stated in the previous section of this proposal,the costs of this project are closely tied to this schedule.Other activities can possibly change with little impact.Upon notice to proceed we would meet with you and determine if there are any aspects of the schedule that are not realistic from your standpoint.We would then adjust the schedule to accommodate your needs while assuring that the drilling program can proceed with no interruptions. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -18-PR3-5606 6.PROPOSED KEY STAFF The key staff for this project have been shown in their respective positions in an organization chart which is presented as Figure 6. Mr.Bucky Tart will serve as the Project Director and will be responsible for overall direction of the project and seeing that the project meets its technical,schedule,and cost goals.Mr.Tart is in his 20th year of Alaskan geotechnical engineering.He has over 26 years total experience and has an international reputation in cold regions engineering.He has managed engineering offices for three international geotechnical engineering firms and operated his own business in Alaska. Geotechnical siting studies have been a significant part of his career including missile siting studies in the Air Force,rock resource studies throughout Alaska,waste disposal siting in permafrost terrain,and others.He has frequently used modified decision analyses approaches to rate and rank sites and routes.For all of his time in Alaska he has been closely involve with the Trans Alaska Pipeline.This significant linear project has many geotechnical aspects similar to the Healy to Fairbanks intertie. Mr.Mark Musial is proposed as the Project Manager.He will be responsible for the day to day management of the project and will provide the coordination between the Golder team,the designer,and Golden Valley Electric Association.Having worked more than 12 years in Alaska as a geotechnical engineer,Mr.Musial has gained specific powerline experience,as well as experience managing other large geotechnical investigations throughout the state.He worked closely with Mr.Del LaRue,a key member of your project design team,during our geotechnical investigation of the Bradley Lake 115 kV Transmission Line.Other project experience includes extensive work at the Usibelli Coal Mine in Healy,an investigation of permafrost creep in the Fairbanks area,many projects along the length of the Trans Alaska Pipeline,and bridge foundation investigations at the Gulkana River and near Fairbanks.In addition,Mr.Musial has managed the largest geotechnical investigations Golder has completed in the state involving around the clock operations,fast track engineering,and close coordination with the desi gn team and client. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -19-PR3-5606 Dr.Bob Burk will be responsible for remote sensing and engineering geology along the route. He will participate in route selection surveys and will direct the detailed analyses of aerial photography of the route.Dr.Burk has lived and worked as an engineering geologist in Alaska. He has worked on the existing intertie route and has worked closely with Mr.LaRue in powerline routing studies.In addition Dr.Burk has an extensive history of experience in powerline routing studies in other areas of the country. Mr.Bob Dugan is proposed as the Manager of Field Geology and Drilling for this project.He has over 18 years of Alaska experience in engineering geology.During most of this period he and Mr.Tart have worked together both at Golder and other firms in Alaska.He has managed numerous field geotechnical projects where logistics and environment have offered severe constraints.He is an expert in Arctic logistics and has an unequaled understanding of the geology of Alaska.He has worked with Mr.Tart on numerous geotechnical siting studies and has worked recently in the Healy to Fairbanks area for the State of Alaska at Nenana Canyon, for Usibelli Coal Mine,and the Alaska Railroad from Anchorage to Fairbanks. Mr.Steve Thompson will be responsible for the foundation engineering for this project.He has more than 12 years of experience as a geotechnical engineer and more than three years experience in Alaska.He is an expert in anchor and pile design including projects in Alaska, Russia and the Northwest.He has designed soil nailing and other anchored systems throughout the Pacific Northwest.He recently performed pile load tests and geotechnical design of more than 400 piles for Conoco in Russia. With the exception of Dr.Burk,all of the key personnel for the project are located in our Anchorage office.Resumes for each of these key individuals are provided in Resume section of this proposal which is tabbed for your convenience. In addition to the personnel discussed above,the full Anchorage office staff is available to support this project.We also are able to draw support from our more than 150 people in the Seattle area as necessary. Golder Associates February 22,1994 -20-PR3-5606 7.FIRM EXPERIENCE Golder Associate'is an international geotechnical engineering organization with over 500 people in the United States,about 500 people in Canada and about 300 more people throughout the world.The locations of our worldwide offices are presented on the backcover of this proposal. The Alaska office of Golder Associates was established in 1980.Since that time the office has grown to a full time staff of 13 with occasional peaks,depending on workload,exceeding 20 people.We have worked for a variety of clients including Dryden and LaRue,Usibelli Coal Mine,the Alaska Railroad,Alyeska Pipeline Service Company,ARCO Alaska,Conoco,Cyprus Minerals,and others.In the section of this proposal tabbed "Sample Projects",we have presented brief descriptions with photographs of many of our recent Alaskan projects.Since we propose to do most of the work associated with this project out of our Anchorage office,we have chosen not to highlight the numerous powerline projects that have been completed over the years by our offices in the Lower 48.Many of these projects appear on Dr.Burk's resume which is included in this proposal.We will draw from his experience with these projects. This proposal should give you a "feel”for the manner in which we assemble our reports. Additional information presenting typical figures from some of our reports is shown in Figure 7. Golder Associates FIGURES Golder Associates NMWwE76/djuyvaONA3BON9n0POSSEYON1DaMOH,Oan0udd¥AV/"ONINOILVIDOSSY91NL9373AZTIVANaq709|SNOILVD01310H3SYNOSG3SOdO0udsaye!ossysapjonsvweorBites LyreEXISTINGcoaloak '"s Se Dunbar pees>re aeheyego22pts.WN.2 a8 Soa Ty rn .'oye p TS RY a res Gro ly, is pa."BEEerCa,ORASSS3:g4SEheE ROUTE? pare ase ! wn Sys }7S Ne ee sibel vay MounteeUsibel"7.iLathrep hasta gi LEGEND: APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION REFERENCE:MAP PROVIDED BY GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC.eo;AND NUMBERLeunbig Man-hour Breakdown per Resource /Task {|Unit$ $130 g 110 $55 $110 gS g 45 TOTAL TOTAL Project Project Engineer Geologist Driller Clerical MHs MHs Manager Engineer Staff Phase 1 Phase 2 | PROJECT ADMINISTRATION _Phase1 |4 g g [_40Phase2|48 16 16 80 | DATA REVIEW Phase 1 8 g 8 |24 Phase 2 8 8 8 24 | STUDY DESIGN CRITERIA Phase!|16 12 |_22 Phase2|16 12 28 _] GEOLOGICAL MAPPING Phase1 |63 4 36 |103 Phase 2 44 4 20 68 | SOILS BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA | Phase 1 2 3 ie |L 21 Phase 2 2 3 16 OC 21 } FOUNDATION /ANCHOR TYPE i Phase 1 g 36 20 ||64 Phase 2 13 53 32 103 | DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS Phase 1 1 228 180°+684 [1093 Phase 2 1 600 428 *1800 2829 "| FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS | Phase 1 48 160 __t L 208 Phase 2 96 240 Z 304, FINAL REPORT _tePhase!|4g 116 4a ao L244 Phase 2 48 116 4). 40 244 | Total MH=>1825 3701 I Figure 2 ESTIMATED COST GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC./AK. pao.ec-soPR3 5604 OWG NO ore 2/94 ween NM pean Golder Associates Task #Link # 1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Phase 1 40 MH $4560 Phase 2 80 MH $9120 200 DATA REVIEW Phase 1 24 MH ¢2800 Phase 2 24 MH $2800 3.0 STUDY DESIGN CRITERIA Phase 1 28 MH ¢3160 Phase 2 28 MH g 3160 4.0 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING (1) Phase 1 103.MH $20226 Phase 2 68 MH $9610 5.0 SOILS BORING LOCATIONS AND DATA Phase 1 21 MH $2320 Phase 2 21 MH $2320 6.0 FOUNDATION /ANCHOR TYPE Phase 1 64 MH $6700 Phase 2 103.MH $10720 7.0 °'DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS Phase 1 1093 MH ¢116704 Phase 2 2829 MH $172349 8.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORTS Phase 1 208 MH $23105 Phase 2 304 MH $43010 9.0 FINAL REPORT Phase 1 244 MH $_25320 Phase 2 244 MH $25320 0.0 EXPENSES -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Phase 1 N/A $ Phase 2 N/A $ TOTAL LABOR AND EXPENSES {493304 I CONTINGENCY 10 00% "GRAND TOTAL N.T.E.=====>||5216234 | (1)Includes $10,616 for geology cround truth -Task 4.1 Figure 3 PROPOSED MANHOUR DISTRIBUTION GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC 4x prosectno PR3 5604 OwWG NO pate 2/94 eran SA awo@oven Golder Associates Labor Catagory :Rate/Hr. Principal $135 Associate $110 Senior $95 Project II $70 Project I $65 Staff 1]$60 Staff I $55 Technician $50 Drafter $45 Secretary $40 Other Charges PC $10/Hr. (Maximum $30/day,$350/month) CADD Station $25/Hr.(No Daily Limit) Subcontractors/Direct Charges Markup at 10% Mileage $0.275/mile Copies $0.15/page Figure 4 PROPOSED UNIT RATES | GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC./AK ean.PR3 5604 awe we sae 2/94 esas SM eeoen.es Golder Associates 138135A/ESUPPLIESPHASE 1 ice to ProceProjectRuninistrationDataiew Study Desion CriteriaGeolagioMappingGeologyGroundTruthVerifySoilBoringLocationsFoundation/Aanchor Type Drilling and Sampling MethodsROWObtainedbyGY Field Locate DOONNNNGTSSOWHECrOWNrOOS-oOooceerPHASE2 gOrGundSOSoocecerfoe to Proceed Proyect Administration Data Review Finalize Desi Criteria Update Geolo Mapping Determine So Drilling and Sampling Methods ROW Obtained by GY Field Locate Borings Geotechnical BoringsFieldandator a stineFieidandtaeResult Phase 2 ReportOODNNVNONAWN March 1994 April 1994 14 4 a ---++++qq->*+-?+Mar May44.1s1 Boring Locations Finalize Foundation/anchor Design 4Tv T T t iiara.| >-H44Dawewceevccerrcccrneeeer? Peeve ennccrensccccncese +>. >et]>-->-+-->-Figure 5 PROPOSED PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 SCHEDULE GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC./AK. PROJELI NG PR3 5604 bw NO vate 2/94 baawn SM Golder AssociatesAPPHOVEO PROJECT DIRECTOR Bucky Tart,PE. y PROJECT MANAGER Mark Musial,PE. REMOTE SENSING/GEOLOGY FIELD GEOLOGY/DRILLING §FOUNDATION ENGINEERING : Bob Burk,Ph.O.Bob Dugan,PE. Figure 6 PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART GOLOEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC /AK -2n.¢2°.0PR3 5604 =wG wo sare 2/94 SM eee cet Golder Associates RECORD OF BOREHOLE 93G-0S-H14 sare:= PROLCT LOCATION OUater-tins ponmes CATE.teen pele wh (2,OROACT MAASER 023-0120 mO BOtENG LOCATION 30671Laton a f i mers , ;on mora :|.STATIONING =a TIS S500 LEGENDc2Eumernsaea:+00 1 '.5 °ar own nec |45500 46°00 00 48°00 9700i*g on E =|.|;baleen!a LANDSLOE DEPOSITS -Gray clay.sm ond lee sand elerheddedsenmnnred wth own:CONNECTING FLL AREAS Ine 10 mech sand wie Io some Ine In mean @ averbronseparpemenrCADSPACLAMONSTURECONTENTTIDEFLATANDMARSHDEPOSITSGrayclayeysftDark brown peat and ame sitfanweenmomsweyORE4west|wocalyatihesurface.up lo 1 feel Wackjnommesent™4 (LEFT OF See.RENTAL SHOOTING RANGE Sum ace GLACIOFLUVIAL TERRACE DEPOSIIS Derk vetowsh brown ine lo com se navi WaceCENTERLINE!OO at to some tne to coms @ ave!|Crrry we pare |hopes ten ||ROOILEGGERCOVEFORMATION bte-beadedgray clay.94 and ine sandHs°°Typcely wel shaided won rt EAST OUDERGLACIOFLUVIAL DEPOSITS Brown sand end gravel Nol encounterednGA!(even)woaamik Pau aGHT OF TS aoOwNCI LAKEWOOD CT 200 berngs.Cantect shown @ from Uncme,1008 (see Note 4)0CENTERLINE)GANwo;cvvats |dane |200mm ---- Approzenate contact baned on coniacts noted af the borehole locations,Pro}4007iEXISTINGGROUNDSURFACEATCENTERLINE.=woali -2.Nilered contact besed on topog aphy and geologc mapping by La]i we 2 PROPOSED CENTERLINE GRADE 2 GAI ard Unde,1988.(see Note 41©|very aor,Sunn uh aay mancty GRAVEL |--3 aed)&eee]weetc|--5 ----ee -"2 wo woitedeeee_-7 zoo)ume jie}aoe >aids Ree ee ei demesne -15 =Fs- A PEAT/SOFT SOL -->><Zo 0,™|het a nam 2 OO |:CONNECTING FLL 2 re,2 avy Pr a f comectna 3tanQrmerrenainnseseemeraarsoe\]Oe9 nh 8?steerer©--ton ee7 feast)78°22YaLaa °canteen {MNERAL SOLpcreeureComanereottara4APPROXMATEBOTTOM YLnenooaareraota|OF DEPOSIT L{LEFT OF CENTERLINE APPROX MATE porto Notes °20 200 fro20= t 1 :RIGHT OF CENTERLINE 1 lope anhy kom wndeted.unitedmaoofEmendor!AFB prowdedbyUSKH,Scoe i :NOTES hovempe:BES 'Pi 1 Peat/sott pot has ether Deen removed Irom beneath Connacing (0 areas r=O70 Ihe existingmonway.oF 4 wes found undertyng9tweenof 2 Gererazedgroiogeumsshown were nGAl '3 8 beet of lam nese arens Fi 5 Varetons wt errs!between stralgzanhy shown here and actus condtons z gure2SotiomofpeatestmatedtorpurposesofGevecpngdeagnquantities 3)BH 238 end sof contions depcied thereby hom Undme.1986 isee Note 4):H Actua)eevetion may vary ESTIMATED BOTTOM OF PEAT/SOFT SOIL Figure 7H4Geooecutnamesatte"Engneerng Gronge Mans of the GovermenttitMea,|;£]3.starowng of ro00 and STATIONS 45-75 TO 52-00 Somwace'hanes Hensal@ Wome US Cooneee tures Dees tein oe CROSS SECTION|r=i bf a ave UBSKH 7 OLD SEWARO MaNWAY /AK Orscrotons we basedonmeleras ecoOunecreda GA!porehors.USKH/PORT DEVELOPMENTs :|omacren mw.ont 2704 am tem TALE Goider Associates mareww003 902 owe ey Te alae Golder AssociatesiIi : i) ! -'.TABLE B1 at ome =Figure A17 SSraieas :INDEX TEST SUMMARYmoeceeLmtdGolderAssocimesmy r iBomna|samee|DEPTHNO:NO.®saat 7 Fx]: 2 "5 ! 3 1238 1"ms : a as a nD ' e moAA7me :s we +"]secre "a|3 |TC-®=BOREHOLE NO be as 8 :a22aowT-|-==-SEASONALLY FROZEN SOR 3 mo .*.i:. "ms w wos.a vewoi}o-END OF HOLE VGA '2 E=)7 A 2 ao »a7 a se a 149 a :|: : o a yao 6 i i»s 2D F |: 2 s mo Da |:g wo 7 mp "6 i :=SURFICIAL SALTY SAND ."o n 1 \S WEA 7 1D E]a .a 2 «0 2 ::|Haaoa..i .:"a 120 1":._ot :i1004a170ory...1 tha ft t i m3 ty ... ' . !tTe-12 TC-19 'zo 2 :::|. ;sees 7 mmo W ... !-s ry ms ":..i*ao ":::' Sat.PEAT &j °ae '8 n zi !baleoORGANICRICHLeo|Z es 6 ..:;1 -4SORS£'a mao ”a au %e ro{"ao ry ..aan :-4 |%#0 2 :::|:{6 2bo ado 650 900 !"1080.9 ”8 4 ={ae woMORIZONTALDISTANCEFEETi"ie "op :.|7 i Noa 1 7.|.” .!2 so oo]..|!:ii3#0 er 7 on t wo ;s 40 ma ...(- !s 20 a::.||:! :'Mo 1°8 'c se:NOTES ;'wo wi.ven |. : ¢]+GROUND SURFACE TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY Figure 21 :'wo *|:' z LOUNSBURY &ASSOCIATES.JANUARY 84 A t w as az . :':. CROSS SECTIONA-A i "se 2 1 pe 8 MwS|2 BOREHOLES PROJECTED ALONG CONTOUR LOLUMBSURY &ABBOCIATES/TOWN &COUNTRY ESTATES/AK.'6 ne a!|' 4 7 Ro »!' F .tee oe ATE KOM we won 904 somes ose fang Golder Associsies ig u re 7 Golcer Assocines - GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC./AK. prasectno PR3 5604 DWG NO Revno -pare 2/94 oraws SM -approveo Golder Associates RESUMES Golder Associates €2)GolderBurk1?ASSOCiatesRobertL. Education ,B.S.,Geology (Honors),San Diego State University,1969 MS.,Geology,University of Washington,1971 Ph.D.,Geology,University of Washington,1979 Affiliations Member,Association of Engineering GeologistsMember,Geological Society of America Member,American Association for the Advancement of Science Member,Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Positions1993todate _-Principal,Golder Associates,Seattle,Washington 1987 -1993 Associate,Golder Associates,Seattle,Washington 1984 -1987 Senior Engineering Geologist,Golder Associates,Seattle,Washington 1981 -1984 Senior Engineering Geologist and Head of the Earth Sciences Group,DOWLEngineers,Anchorage,Alaska 1979 -1981 Faculty Research Associate,Quaternary Research Center,University of Washington,Seattle 1975 -1979 Independent Consulting Geologist,Seattle,Washington 1975 Engineering Geologist,R and M Consultants,Fairbanks,Alaska 1974 Engineering Geologist,Wilsey and Ham,Seattle,Washington 1971 -1974 Independent Consulting Geologist,Seattle,Washington 1971 Project Geologist,SEREM of Alaska (BRGM-France),Anchorage,Alaska Professional Summary __Dr.Burk is a Senior Engineering Geologist with Golder Associates in Seattle,whohaslocalandinternationalexperienceinthepracticalapplicationofthegeological sciences to both large and small scale engineering projects.Dr.Burk has performed detailed geologic studies,as well as broad regional overviews,in the areas of slope stability,rock mechanics,Quaternary geology,geologic mapping, resource assessment,facilities siting,geologic hazards,paleoclimatology,and hydrogeology.He has extensive experience working in Alaska with permafrost and thawed ground foundation conditions,in steep mountainous terrain in the Pacific Northwest,and in desert regions of Nevada and California. Additional CertificationsHealthandSafety Certification per OSHA 29CFR1910 3 2” Robert L.Burk POWER TBANSMISSION LINE AND PIPELINE INVESTIGATIONS 1993-1994 1992 1992 1991-1992 1991 1991 1990-1991 1988 -1989 1985 -1986 1985 -1986 1984 1984 1984 1982 Project manager for all geotechnical work along the 8-mile long Talbot-Berrydale Transmission Line,King County,Washington. Slope stability evaluation along the Ellensburg-Cle Elum,Washington power transmission line. Slope stability evaluation for a power transmission line near Lyman,Washington. Project manager for all geologic and geotechnical work along the proposed 150- mile long TransMountain oil pipeline around Puget Sound,Washington. Geologie mapping along the proposed 80-mile long route for a transmission line from Sidney,Nebraska to Yuma,Colorado. Geologic mapping along the proposed 40-mile long route for a transmission line from Fort Peck to Wolf Point,Montana. Geotechnical investigation for a 20-mile-long power transmission line near Kittitas, Washington including evaluation of slope stability. Evaluation of a power transmission line for the proposed Swift Creek hydropower project near Mt.Baker,Washington. Assessment of power transmission line routing and foundations based on a drilling program,slope stability analyses and assessment of river channel changes. 20-mile long Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project transmission line,Alaska. Engineering geology associated with construction claims on the Anchorage-Healy power transmission intertie.Included detailed independent assessment of foundation conditions and review of previous geotechnical investigations. Foundation recommendations for a microwave tower site near Kenai Lake,Alaska, for the Harris Corporation. Analysis of a landslide and associated hydrogeologic problems along a section ofaPugetPowertransmissionlineinPierceCounty,Washington. Siting and rock slope stability analysis for a major Kodiak Electric Association power transmission line on Kodiak Island,Alaska. Power transmission line routing recommendations based on a reconnaissance investigation of foundatwn characteristics for the proposed 160-mile long Anchorage-Glennallen interte. Golder Associates Robert L.Burk 1981 -1982 Power transmission line routing recommendations based on a reconnaissance investigation of slope stability,snow avalanches,and soil/rock foundation »characteristics for the proposed 150-mile long Valdez -Cordova -Glenallen intertie. 1981 Geologic input to the Environmental Impact Statement for the Anchorage-Healy power transmission intertie. 1980 Beach stability at Point Heyer,Vashon Island,Washington with respect to antenna ground radials for radio station KVI. ¥3 "4 Golder Associates Robert G.Dugan Education B.A.,Geology,University of Colorado,1970 Registratior'Registered Professional Geologist,Alaska,RG-191 Affiliations Association of Engineering Geologists,Member and Officer -Alaska Section Experience 1989 to date 1986-1989 1976-1986 Alaska Geological Society,Member Golder Associates Anchorage,Alaska Senior Project Geologist to Associate Managed numerous projects for a major arctic oil pipeline including:development of a comprehensive manual for geotechnical and hydrological monitoring; preparation of an erosion control plan;preparation of specifications for culvert installation,erosion control,fences,riprap,and guardrails;subsurface investigations at areas of degrading permafrost;and development of work plan for indexing borehole logs.Other work included investigations of tunnel instability,riprap quarry,landslides,herbicide contamination,and ballast fouling for the Alaska Railroad;tunnel feasibility studies,rock slope stability,landslide investigation,and environmental assessments for the Alaska Department of Transportation;waste sampling,gravel source evaluation,waste disposal pit siting, and foundation investigations for a major oil company;and investigations of oil spills,environmental assessments,slope stability,foundations,waste remediation, and landfills for a variety of other clients. Woodward Clyde Consultants Anchorage,Alaska Project Geologist Project Manager or Principal Geologist for numerous projects including: investigation of 20 contaminated sites at Elmendorf AFB involving installation of 60 monitoring wells,geophysical surveys,soil gas surveys,and a pump test; hazardous waste sampling and debris inventories at several active and inattive remote military sites,investigation and remediation of several fuel spills including installation of a vapor extraction system;geotechnical investigation of major new military facility,and assessment of shorelines contaminated by oil from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Independent Geological Consultant Anchorage,Alaska Conducted a variety of geologic and geotechnical investigations including: identification of armor stone sites at Sand Point,St.Paul Island,Chignik,and the Northwest coast of Alaska;geologic mapping,fault trenching,and subsurface exploration of a mountainous portion of the Eklutna Water Pipeline;management of over-the-ice investigations of proposed artificial islands,offshore material sites, and other facilities in the Beaufort Sea;geologic reconnaissance of the 8mile Bradley Lake access road in extremely steep terrain;investigation of runway alignment at Sand Point including offshore and onshore drilling and rock coring; geologic investigation of mineral prospect in Southeast Alaska. v4 : Bar] Robert G.Dugan 1974-1976 R &M Consultants Fairbanks,Alaska Field GeologisteLoggedboreholes and operated drilling equipment along the Trans AlaskaPipeline;staked claims at remote mineral prospect. Additional Certifications Health and Safety Certification per OSHA 29CFR1910 uw":244 Golder Associates Robert G.Dugan COLD REGIONS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Mode Confirmation Fairbanks,Alaska Logged boreholes on helicopter supported drilling projects during soils investigations of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. * Landslide Mapping Healy,Alaska Mapped pre-mining landslide features for a new mining area for the Usibelli Coal Mine near Healy,Alaska. Eklutma Quarry Investigation Eklutna,Alaska Developed a mining plan and blasting guidelines for further development of the Eklutna rock quarry for the Alaska Railroad Corporation. Settling Pond Evaluation Healy,Alaska Evaluated two settling pond embankments for Usibelli Coal Mine,Healy,Alaska. Nenana Canyon Slope Stability Healy,Alaska Conducted geotechnical investigation of 600 ft high landslide of degrading Birch Creek schist threatening the Parks Highway near Healy,Alaska and developed mitigation alternatives to protect the highway. Whittier Tunnel Portage,Alaska Managed a multi-discipline evaluation of the feasibility of using the 2.5 mile Whittier tunnel on the Alaska Railroad for joint single-lane railroad and highway use.The project included a geotechnical assessment of three tunnel alternatives,the updating of previous cost estimates for tunnel construction,revised traffic estimates and revenue costs,and a limited environmental assessment. Rock Stabilization _Portage,Alaska Evaluated a rockfall which occurred in the Portage Tunnel on the Alaska Railroad and made recommendations for rock stabilization. Garner Tunnel Evaluation Healy,Alaska Conducted a geotechnical investigation at Garner Tunnel for the Alaska Railroad to determine the cause of rockfall and portal instability in the metamorphic rockmass.Project required a review of the tunnel history,detailed structural mapping,rock engineering,and the development of monitoring plans and remedial measures to stabilize the tunnel. Eklutna Water Project Eklutna,Alaska -Principal investigator of geotechnical investigation of the 6.2-mile P-4 pipeline segment of the Eklutna Water Project.The segment involved nine river crossings,helicopter supported drilling on very steep slopes,fault crossings,and actively aggrading alluvial fans. v4 a] Golder Associates Robert G.Dugan Bradley Lake Hydroelectric Project Homer,Alaska Conducted helicopter supported geologic investigation of the eight-mile access road from tidewater to the Bradley Lake Dam near Homer,Alaska for the Corps of Engineers. Railbed Soil Sampling Various Locations,Alaska Managed the drilling and sampling of six herbicide test sites along the Alaska Railroad between Seward and Fairbanks.Samples were analyzed to determine the persistence and migration of herbicides. Borehole Staking Interior,Alaska Used aerial photographs to identify and stake boreholes for geotechnical drilling project along the proposed Trans Alaska Gas Line. "4 2 Golder Associates Mark R.Musial Education Registration Affiliations Experience 1992 to date 1985-1991 1981-1984 1978-1981 B.S.,Civil Engineering,University of California,Berkeley,California 1980 MSS.,Civil/Geotechnical Engineering,University of California, Berkeley,1981 Professional Engineer,Alaska,CE 6758 Professional Engineer,California,No.43261 American Society of Civil Engineers,Member National Society of Professional Engineers,Member Golder Associates Anchorage,Alaska Associate Project Manager for major geotechnical and environmental projects involving multidisciplined teams and work in remote,arctic conditions.Representative projects have included marine investigations involving pile design and testing, seismic design of slopes,and geophysical investigations;environmental site assessment and thermal modeling for design of the first permafrost closure of a regional solid and oily waste landfill in Prudhoe Bay;investigation of pipeline stability across slopes;geotechnical engineering and environmental assessmentforreconstructionofroadsandhighwaysinAnchorage,and thermal modeling and stability evaluation of a creeping permafrost slope. Golder Associates Anchorage,Alaska Project to Senior Geotechnical Engineer Extensive work with field investigations and engineering evaluations such as evaluation of mine sites,onshore and over-ice investigations on the North Slope, foundation investigations for a variety of structures,and environmental assessment and site characterization.Representative projects include engineering and operational evaluations of coal mine spoil and open pit slopes,slope stability evaluation and monitoring of pipeline movement,spray ice island construction and engineering in US and Canadian Beaufort Sea,and pile load testing of transmission line foundations. Harding Lawson Associates Anchorage,Alaska Civil Engineer Projects included field investigation,foundation analysis,and laboratory testing for development of arctic oil production facilities including the Lisburne and Duck Island (Endicott)projects as well as numerous undeveloped prospects. Work involved over ice,marine and terrestrial investigations. NEESA Port Hueneme,California Civil Engineer to Technicuan Source emissions testing,laboratory analysis,and instrument calibration supporting boiler tune up activities for the U.S.Navy Energy Environment Support Activity (NEESA). Additional Certifications Health and Safety Certification per OSHA 29CFR1910 LS «4 Mark R.Musial COLD REGIONS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Open Pit Coal Mine Planning Healy,Alaska Project manager for a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for planning and permitting development of a new mine area near Gold Run Pass at the Usibelli Coal Mine.This work included an extensive field and laboratory testing program,as well as development of geotechnical design parameters for both frozen and unfrozen soil and rock units.The investigation also included an evaluation of the site geohydrology and it's impact on design of the planned facilities. In addition,stability analyses were conducted to develop to support the recommended pit configurations and slopes. Nixon Fork Tailings Dam McGrath,Alaska Site characterization and feasibility level design for tailings impoundments located in areas of sporadic permafrost.Field work included aerial reconnaissance,drilling,and geophysical investigations to identify and characterize soil and bedrock permafrost.Subsequent design work involved conceptual design and cost analysis of alternative tailings impoundments. Permafrost Creep Stability Fox,Alaska Evaluation of the stability of a warm permafrost slope undergoing creep movements.Field work involved a multi-year program of instrumentation and monitoring of the slope using slope indicators,thermistor strings,data acquisition systems,and surface monitoring networks to identify creep zones and movement rates.The long term stability of the slope was determined based on correlations with a large base of existing data with thermal analysis results.This work included use of GPS systems to measure surface movements over a wide area. Coal Spoil Slope Stability Healy,Alaska Project manager for the field and office investigation of two major in-pit spoil slides that occurred at the Poker Flats mining area of the Usibelli Coal Mine.These slides were the culmination of increasing stability problems that were being experienced due to increasing dip of the base structure,more permafrost in overburden soils,and increased groundwater inflow.During this work he worked closely with mine personnel to back analyze the failures and revise the previous understanding of failure mechanisms.In addition,revised operational procedures for both spoil placement and groundwater control were developed.These revised procedures were successfully implemented in subsequent pits without significant instability problems. Landfill Closure Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Evaluation of the thaw stability of an oily waste landfill located adjacent to a flooded gravel pit. This work involved finite element analysis of the site to predict thaw bulb development and migration towards the landfill.In addition,an extensive field program was conducted to verify the existing thermal conditions and characterize the chemical nature of the wastes in the pit. Conceptual designs were developed for close the landfill using a frozen cap and the extensive natural permafrost as an impermeable liner. Golder Associates Mark R.Musial Fuel Tank Foundations Nome,Alaska Development of foundation design criteria for construction of large fuel storage tanks.The project was located adjacent to a harbor,with the tanks being founded on seasonally frozen fill,and warm,saline permafrost.Both passive and active mechanical thermal stabilization measured were developed.This project also involved and environmental assessment of the site. Heat Pipe Slope Stabilization Tonsina,Alaska This project was part of an extensive investigation of pipeline slope stability on warm permafrost slopes.Work included evaluation of thaw consolidation of a lens of degrading,ice-rich permafrost and design of a heat pipe system (thermosyphons)to thermally stabilize the permafrost and mitigate slope movement. Slope Stabilization Healy,Alaska Project manager directing reevaluation of previous slide mechanisms and development of remedial options for stabilization of historic flow slides at the site at the Poker Flats mining area.This work included detailed analysis and interpretation of historical aerial photography,field investigations, monitoring of ground temperatures and slope movement,stability analyses,and conceptual designs to stabilize the slide. Lisburne Development Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Comprehensive study of onshore and offshore conditions prior to design of the Lisburne Development.Field work involved around the clock drilling using one drill mounted in an enclosure and another track mounted rig supported by SnowCat.In addition,geophysical investigations were conducted using deep electrical resistivity methods to identify the depth of deep thaw bulbs beneath Prudhoe Bay and river crossings.The work was performed to delineate soil units and evaluate mechanical_and thermal properties of the soil units in order to develop design parameters for pile supported structures,causeways,drilling islands,and roads and other infrastructure. Road and Highway Reconstruction Anchorage,Alaska Developed geotechnical designs for a number of different subgrade conditions in sub-arctic conditions.Special emphasis was placed on mitigating frost penetration and improving subsurface drainage of roadway structures.Design conditions included difficult conditions,including very frost susceptible silt subgrades,high water table and artesian conditions,and peat areas.Measures to improve pavement performance included use of insulation,thickened sections,and subdrainage. Foundation and Gravel Studies Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Executed field investigations at a number of different sites in the Prudhoe Bay area,including flare pits,water supply reservoirs,pipeline crossings of thaw bulbs.Work included winter and summerdrillingprogramsusingtrackedcarriers,helicopters,and rolligons.In addition,ground penetrating radar was used for delineation of ice wedges and optimization of pile locations. Monitoring Well Installations Healy,Alaska Field Engineer supervising installation of monitoring wells up to 360 ft deep in bedrock.Work include supervision of drilling using rotary,Odex,and auger methods. Golder Associates Mark R.Musial VSM QA Inspections Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Inspection of VSM (vertical support member)boreholes and slurry installations. VSM Stability Copper River Area,Alaska Project manager for field investigations and geotechnical evaluations at four sites to assess the stability of VSM's supporting an above ground pipeline.This work has included the collection, management,and evaluation of considerable site data.In addition,the work has included evaluation of the lateral load capacity of piles on marginal permafrost and thawed slopes,and the use of automated data acquisition systems to continuously monitor pipeline movements. Ss ™” Golder Associates Mark R.Musial FOUNDATIONS AND BRIDGES Marine Facilities Valdez,Alaska Project manager for comprehensive investigations at four different sites in the Valdez area.Work has included geotechnical investigations,support during construction,and preparation of design recommendations.Examples of the projects completed includes seismic evaluations of nearshore fill and submarine slopes,geotechnical pile design and construction inspection,dynamic pile testing,evaluation of rock slopes and excavations,general site development recommendations for onshore facilities such as buildings,fills,and parking areas,and marine geophysical investigations. Tensar Retaining Wall and Abutment Gulkana,Alaska Geotechnical engineer for design of a retaining wall/bridge abutment for a road crossing the Gulkana River.The most economical design involved construction of a 20 ft high Tensar reinforced wall system. Bradley Lake Transmission Line Homer,Alaska Project engineer responsible for remote site field investigations,pile load testing,and analysis of pile foundation alternatives for a variety of soil and rock types found along this alignment. Conducted an extensive pile load testing program to evaluate both the lateral and pullout capacity of driven pipe and H-pile sections.Field work included helicopter supported drilling operations. Gabion Abutment Fairbanks,Alaska Developed Gabion designs for raising an access road embankment and bridge abutment for five sites near Fairbanks,Alaska.Work included evaluation of alternative abutment concepts. Mountain View McDonald's Anchorage,Alaska This site has a deep deposit of clearing debris and uncontrolled fill that was end dumped over a bluff.Consequently,we developed of recommendations for pile supported buildings and a sign founded on a monolithic concrete footing.Also inspected the pile installations and provided support during earthworks construction.Post construction involvement included monitoring of parking lot,sign,and embankment settlement. Bird Flats Transmission Towers Bird,Alaska Field investigation for design of sacrificial tower foundations for transmission lines in this area are periodically swept by avalanches.Another element of this project was rock mapping to evaluate towers for long spans between the avalanche paths. Bridge 355 Pier Stabilization Healy,Alaska Directed field investigation for development of design and construction criteria for stabilization of a bridge pier foundation on an unstable rock slope along the mainline of the Alaska Railroad.The stabilization design involved utilization of untensioned shear pins to reinforce the rock mass beneath the pier foundation. Residential Foundations Anchorage,Alaska Prepared foundation recommendations for a number of residences located in the Municipality of Anchorage's Seismic Zone 4.These projects have included footing recommendations,evaluation of consolidation settlement of soft,sensitive sous,and general earthwork recommendations. vs ™ Golder Associates Rupert G.Tart,Jr PY coder/f Associates Education , Registration Affiliations Experience 1988 to date 1988-1989 1986-1988 M.S.,Civil Engineering,West Virginia University,1966 B.C.E.,Civil Engineering,University of Virginia,1965 Professional Engineer,Alaska CE 3772,California CE 19253,Colorado and New Mexico Geotechnical Engineer,California GE 000821 Past Chairman,Anchorage Geotechnical Advisory Commission Member,U.S.Committee for the International Permafrost Association Past President,Alaska Section,American Society of Civil Engineers Past Chairman,ASCE Technical Council on Cold Regions Engineering Past Treasurer,Anchorage Post,Society of American Military Engineers Member,Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Member,International Society of Soil and Foundation Engineering Member,Society of Petroleum Engineers Member,Society of Explosive Engineers | Golder Associates Anchorage,Alaska Principal and Manager of Alaska Operations Responsible for management and administration of Golder Associates activities in Alaska.Is an internationally recognized specialist in the field of cold regions and permafrost engineering.Over 25 years experience in geotechnical engineering,over 19 of which have been in Alaska.Has over 18 years experience working on various geotechnical and permafrost issues associated with the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and the oil facilities on the North Slope of Alaska. Representative projects that he has implemented and/or managed including geotechnical evaluations for the design and construction of slope stabilization measures,earth dams on frozen and unfrozen ground;climatic considerations for pipeline design,mining facilities,roadways and buildings;and de- sigrVevaluation of ice roads and ice islands.In addition to his cold regions experience in the United States he has recently completed permafrost engineer- ing projects for both the minerals and petroleum industries in Russia. University of Alaska Anchorage Anchorage,Alaska Adjunct Professor of Engineering Taught soil mechanics course in the Civil Engineering department. Dames &Moore Anchorage,Alaska Manager of Alaska Operations in Geotechnical and Cold Regions Engineering Managed projects throughout Alaska.Responsible for all engineering projects conducted in Alaska.Major projects included continuing work on the Trans- Alaska Pipeline and the oil industry on the North Slope of Alaska and design and construction monitoring of Red Dog Mine facilities including dams,building foundations,and waste storage areas. Rupert G.Tart,Jr 1984-1986 1972-1984 1971-1972 1967-1971 Tart Consultants Anchorage,Alaska Owner and Principal Engineer Consultant for several projects including a rock source siting study,seepage evaluations for drill cuttings disposal site,foundation investigations,and geotechnical investigations throughout Alaska. Woodward-Clyde Consultants Anchorage,Alaska Alaska Geotechnical Manager/Geotechnical Engineer Orange,California Responsible for all engineering projects conducted in Alaska.Conducted the initial geotechnical surveillances of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.Conducted explosive tests to assess impacts on pipelines,river locks,and other structures. Directed design certification projects for the first gravel islands placed in the Beaufort Sea.Managed remote Arctic geotechnical investigations including investigations over ice in the Beaufort Sea.Managed the computer system used to design the A/G supports for the Trans Alaska Pipeline.Conducted armor source evaluations for several cities,evaluating the potential of surface exposures and subsurface formations.Managed geotechnical investigations and evaluation for the design and construction of the Very Large Array (VLA)Radiotelescope in New Mexico. Pioneer Consultants Redlands,California Vice President and Chief Engineer Conducted geotechnical investigations for housing development projects throughout Southern California. United States Air Force Norton AFB,California Captain and Project Officer for U.S.Air Force Space and Missiles Systems Organization Evaluated rock locations throughout the Western U.S.for potential minuteman missile silo sites. Additional Certifications Health and Safety Certification per OSHA 29CFR1910 Commercial Pilot Certified Scuba Diver Golder Associates Rupert G.Tart,Jr COLD REGIONS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Kubaka Winter Road Magadan Region,Russia Performed alignment evaluations and developed design criteria and test procedures for evaluating and establishing a 380 km winter road from Omsukchan to Kubaka Mine.Also set up ground temperature monitoring program for tailings dams founded on permafrost. Ardalin Pipeline Terminal Komi Republic,Russia Conducted geotechnical investigation,developed soil parameters for pile design,conducted pile load tests,and monitored the installation of about 100 of the 400 piles installed to support pumping and piping facilities and oil storage tanks. Ardalin Central Production Facility Arkhangel'sk Region,Russia Conducted first American pile load test in Russia and developed design for 400 piles at the Ardalin Field Central Production Facility.Monitored the installation of the piles and developed criteria for driving the piles in permafrost at the site. SA-10 Landfill North Slope Borough,Alaska Directed a closeout study of an existing landfill in which permafrost was used to contain the waste. Slope Creep Trans Alaska Pipeline,Alaska Evaluated a creeping slope along the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.The slope covered about 1 square mile and was determined to have been moving for more than 15 years. Regional Mud Waste Storage Site Selection Prudhoe Bay,AlaskaDirectedasiteselectionstudytolocatearegionalwastestoragefacilityinpermafrostontheNorthSlopeofAlaska.* Regional Mud Waste Storage Ice Road Specifications Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Prepared specifications for construction of an ice road capable of handling heavy trucks while protecting tundra from damage. Pavement Heave Anchorage,Alaska Conducted an evaluation of the design criteria and construction procedures utilized by the MOA for street construction.Efforts included:review of existing procedures and available literature related to paving in areas similar in climate to Anchorage;inspection of nine subdivisions and evaluation of possible cause of road damage;performed relevant analyses;and prepared draft and final reports which detailed work and presented recommendations. Open Pit Mine Valdez Creek,Alaska Directed a slope stability monitoring effort and evaluation for an open pit gold mine in permafrost terrain. ¥6 us Golder Associates Rupert G.Tart,Jr Thaw Settlement Trans Alaska Pipeline,AlaskaEvaluatedthaysettlementunderafillnearapumpstationfortheTrans-Alaska Pipeline. Red Dog Mine Red Dog Mine,Alaska Managed waste storage area design study.Developed slope stability and drainage recommenda- tions for mine waste rock storage on a discontinuous permafrost slope. Nixon Fork Mine McGrath,Alaska Conducted geotechnical work associated with and economic feasibility study to determine the profitability of developing a gold mine at the site of the historic Nixon Fork Mine. Whittier Railroad Tunnel Whittier,Alaska Directed a feasibility study for the modification of the Whittier Railroad Tunnel into a joint usehighwayandrailtunnel. Squirrel Creek Squirrel Creek,Alaska Managed the investigation of seismic criteria and preparation of final design specifications for slopes along the pipeline. Sag River Road North Slope,Alaska Conducted an investigation of seepage through Sag River Road at Sag Site "C"Reservoir for ARCO Alaska. Oily Waste Pit North Slope,Alaska Directed a geotechnical assessment of Pad 3 Oil Waste Pit for ARCO Alaska. Disposal Site Seepage Evaluation Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Seepage evaluation for drill cuttings disposal site for Exxon Company USA. Gravel Island Studies Beaufort Sea,Alaska Directed design and/or construction certification studies of gravel islands in the Beaufort Sea for Exxon,Shell,and Standard Oil Companies. Dam Design and Construction Kuparuk Camp,Alaska Design and construction consultant for a dam constructed with frozen silt at Kuparuk Camp. Usibelli Coal Mine Healy,Alaska Evaluated stability of spoil slopes for Usibelli Coal Mine in Healy,including effects of both hydrostatic pressure and discontinuous permafrost. Kensington Mine Juneau,Alaska Developed preliminary hydrogeological monitoring program for Kensington Mine in Juneau. Rock and Soil Slides Denali Park,Alaska ve a Golder Associates Rupert G.Tart,Jr Whittier Railroad Tunnel Whittier,Alaska Directed a feasibility study for the modification of the Whittier Railroad Tunnel into a joint use highway and rail tunnel. Slope Stability Investigation Treasure Creek,Alaska Managed a preliminary investigation of slope stability for a pipeline section located at TreasureCreek,Alaska,near Fairbanks. Garner Tunnel Healy,Alaska Conducted an engineering stability evaluation of the ARRC's Garner Tunnel.Efforts entailed a comprehensive assessment of the existing tunnel support as well as an investigation of the over-all stability of the mountainside to determine if the tunnel may be involved with a large-scale slope _ failure. Eklutma Quarry Eklutna,Alaska Managed efforts to provide a quarry development plan and production blasting specifications to Alaska Railroad for use at the Eklutna Quarry and at other locations along the railroad. Valdez Creek Mine Valdez,Alaska Evaluated a tailings dam for the Valdez Creek Mine. Nixon Fork Mine McGrath,Alaska Directed hydrological engineering services at the Nixon Fork Mine during the 1990 sampling program.Efforts entailed sampling and gauging of a total of six sites on three streams as well as preliminary analysis (fieldwork)of several sites in the main stream channels for tailings disposal. Tailings Disposal Study Juneau,Alaska Directed a dry tailings disposal study for the Kensington Mine near Juneau. Tailings Field Inspection Red Dog Mine,Alaska Managed the field inspection of the initial stages of the construction of the Red Dog tailings for Cominco Alaska. Kensington Mine Juneau,Alaska Directed reconnaissance survey and tailings dam site selection project for Kensington Mine near Juneau,Alaska. Waste Storage Area Design Study Red Dog Mine,Alaska Managed Red Dog Mine waste storage area design study.Developed slope stability and drainage recommendations for mine waste rock storage on a discontinuous permafrost slope. Foundation Study Red Dog Mine,Alaska Directed a foundation study for mine facilitws at the Red Dog Mine.Identified and characterizedfrozenrockfoundationproperties. Se o™ Golder Associates Rupert G.Tart,Jr Foundation Analysis and Design Kivalina,Alaska Performed foundation analysis and design for concentrate storage building at Kivalina for Cominco Alaska's Red Dog Project.This ice-rich warm saline permafrost site required a unique foundation system to accommodate extremely heavy loads in the warm saline permafrost. Eklutna Pipeline Project Eklutna,Alaska Provided blast monitoring adjacent to the Eklutna tunnel for Eklutna Pipeline Project. River Erosion Protection McGrath,Alaska Conducted a rock source siting study for the City of McGrath.Located and evaluated local sources of armor rock for river erosion protection. Slope Stability Investigation Nelchina,Alaska Slope stability investigation and evaluation at Nelchina,Alaska for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Test Blast Programs Fairbanks and North Slope,Alaska Conducted test blast programs for the Alaska Natural Gas Transmission System to determine the effects of blasting during the construction of this system on the Trans Alaska Pipeline. Aerial Reconnaissance Trans Alaska Pipeline,Alaska Performed the initial aerial reconnaissance surveys used to evaluate the geotechnical performance of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. Golder Associates Steven R.Thompson PY cotaerAssociates Education Registration Affiliations Experience 1990 -date 1987 -1990 1981 -1987 1980 -1981 B.S.,Geology,Tufts University,Medford,Massachusetts,1979 MS.,Civil Engineering,University of Illinois,Urbana,Illinois,1981 Registered Professional Engineer:Washington,Alaska American Society of Civil Engineers Golder Associates Anchorage,Alaska Associate Responsible for general review of engineering projects completed in the Anchorage office.Project manager for design and construction of tailings pond expansion;static and dynamic slope stability,seismic risk assessment, and foundation design for marine dock structures;development of design manual and construction specifications for lined secondary containment systems for petroleum product storage;blast-induced pore pressure monitoring and spoil pile stability analyses for coal mine;comprehensive review of settlement data,analysis of foundation refrigeration system,and thermal modeling for North Slope oil production facility;rockfall modeling and design of rockfall barriers;site investigation,static and dynamic stability analyses,and design of municipal solid waste landfill. Golder Associates Redmond,Washington Senior Engineer Principal designer of soil nailed shoring systems including temporary walls for local building excavations,and permanent walls for road cuts in Washington and New York.Performed independent review of shoring designs for City. Project manager for site investigation,design,and construction of tailings pond and mill facilities for new gold mine;feasibility study and tailings pond design for expansion of existing gold property.Performed design and ground behavior assessment for water supply tunnel;clearance improvements for railroad tunnel in Canada. Shannon &Wilson Inc.Seattle,Washington Engineer to Senior Engineer Responsible for field investigations,design,and contract document preparation for twin-tube underground transit system in downtown Seattle; test tunnel construction,mapping,and instrumentation;preparation of design and contract documents,and comprehensive instrumentation monitoring and interpretation for very large diameter soft ground highway tunnel;analysis, design,and construction supervision of railroad tunnel clearance improvements under live track conditions. S.J.Groves Salt Lake City,Utah Engineering Geologist Mapping of gravel borrow pit to determine quantities of useable material. Additional Certifications | Health and Safety Certification per OSHA 29CFR1910 LS 4 Steven R.Thompson SHORING/RETAINING WALLS Design work for the following projects typically included the anchor systems,including steel tendons,corrosion protection systems,borehole diameters,and grout mixes and pressures;and the facing walls,including shotcrete thickness,reinforcing,and drainage systems.Construction support typically included full-time observation of anchor and facing wall installation,performance testing of anchors before production installation and proof testing of anchors during production installation. Hunter Mountain Road Hunter,New York Fast-track design and on-call construction support for a 400-foot long,25-foot high permanent soil nailed wall for road cut in the Catskill Mountains of New York.Project involved on-site design of horizontal drain system to handle unexpected water conditions encountered during construction. 1-405 S-Curves Renton,Washington Design of 30-foot high permanent soil nailed wall in mixed soil/rock conditions near Seattle, Washington.Design included consideration of high lateral and vertical surcharge pressures, seismic loads,and hydrostatic pressures. 8th &Pine Seattle,Washington Design of 65-foot high soil nailed wall for temporary shoring of high-rise building excavation. Design included underpinning of 3-story brick structure,and restrictions on nail lengths due to proximity of adjacent transit tunnel and building with deep basement. Swedish Hospital Seattle,Washington Design and construction support of 56-foot high soil nailed wall for temporary shoring of medical center building excavation on Capitol Hill in Seattle,Washington.Project included top-down construction of permanent basement wall. Mount St.Helens Memorial Highway Washington Design of 40-foot high permanent soil nailed wall in mixed soil/rock conditions for road cut on Mount St.Helens Memorial Highway in Washington. Centennial Plaza Seattle,Washington Design and construction support of 30-foot high soil nailed wall for temporary shoring of building excavation for mixed use office tower in Denny Regrade area of Seattle,Washington.Project included first application of top down construction of permanent basement wall as part of shoring system. 600 Broadway Medical Center Seattle,Washington Design and construction support for 60-foot high soil nailed wall for building excavation for medical center complex.Wall used top down construction techniques and served as both temporary shoring of excavation and permanent basement wall. Brampton Center Toronto,Ontario Design of 30-foot high soil nailed wall for temporary shoring of building excavation for retail center in Toronto,Ontario. a4 234 Golder Associates Steven R.Thompson Union &Minor Apartments Seattle,Washington Design,instrumentation and construction support of 30-foot high soil nailed wall for temporary shoring of apartment building excavation on Capitol Hill in Seattle,Washington. Polyclinic Medical Center Seattle,Washington Design,instrumentation and construction support of 55-foot high soil nailed wall for temporary shoring of medical center building excavation on Capitol Hill in Seattle,Washington. ¥S 1™ Golder Associates Steven R.Thompson FOUNDATIONS Kharyaga Oil Terminal Kharyaga,Russia Developed pile foundation design for oil terminal facilities in Kharyaga,Russia.Work included geotechnical drilling,installation of thermistor strings,installation of test piles,and full scale static pile load testing.Pile load tests were designed to provide creep data in ice-rich,warm permafrost soils.Results of geotechnical testing,thermal monitoring,pile load tests and wave equation analyses were used to develop schedule of pile embedment lengths for entire terminal facility. SERVS Dock Valdez,Alaska Developed pile foundation design for dock structure subjected to large lateral loads from submarine landsliding.Work included pile foundation design,test pile installation and CAPWAP analysis,seismic stability analysis of liquefaction-prone submarine slopes,and prediction of lateral loads on piles caused by submarine sliding. Barrick Gold Strike Carlin,Nevada Geotechnical studies for design and construction of surface facilities for new open pit gold mine in Carlin,Nevada.Project included design and testing of tie-down anchors for mill foundations, and special foundation treatment for expansive soils. Rain Project Carlin,Nevada Design and testing of tie-down anchor system for mill building foundations in Carlin,Nevada. Included elastic analysis of deformatior/capacity characteristics to provide adequate damping of foundation vibrations. Galbraith Airport Galbraith,Alaska Designed adfreeze pile foundations for Visual Approach Slope Indicator lights and runway and navigation lights for bush airport in Brooks Range of Alaska. Bridge Survey ,Fairbanks to Valdez,Alaska Conducted first comprehensive foundation inspection of access road and workpad bridges along southern half of Trans Alaska Pipeline.Set up standard inspection format and drawing package to assist future periodic inspection efforts. West Dock Causeway Prudhoe Bay,Alaska Developed pile foundation design for bridge over causeway breach in Prudhoe Bay,Alaska. Addressed difficult design and construction conditions caused by presence of warm,saline permafrost overlying thawed sand and gravel with high excess water pressures. Sullivan Arena Anchorage,Alaska Investigation and analysis of causes of tloor heaving at Sullivan Arena,Anchorage,Alaska.'Included instrumentation installation and interpretation,analysis of mechanisms of movement,and design of new pile foundation system for floor slab. 3 a4 Golder Associates Steven R.Thompson Ballast Watgr Tanks Valdez,Alaska Foundation design and performance analysis for large concrete ballast water treatment tanks founded on thick,uncontrolled fill at Valdez Marine Terminal.Included full-scale compaction testing and full-scale test fill. 4 a} Golder Associates SAMPLE ALASKAN PROJECTS Golder Associates Alaska Department of Transportation &Public Facilities Nenana Canyon Landslide and Erosion Study Denali National Park,Alaska Golder Associates conducted an extensi:osition and analysis of a dandstide that srs discharging large boulders onto the Pars. osvay near Denali National Parke Phew.rt included extensive surficial geologic ana.oyses ot current and historical photegrapns mapping of the slide features,and evalua”'oo npansonmof various a thods tor pros toes landslide protection for the highway.[*-7 cosh Shows a part of the vandslide im in as maintenance crews attempt to remove GALY3 Golder Associates Anchorage-Fairbanks Intertie Oles,Morrison,and Rinker Healy-Fairbanks,Alaska oa wae.be aeponetshreae,ney oeJeaegeeftre Golder Associates performed geologic reconnaissance mapping,aerial photograph interpretation, evaluation of the geotechnical design and analysis of construction methods used for a 72-mileportionoftheAnchorage-Fairbanks power transmission line intertie.This work was undertakentoprovidethetechnicalbasisforamulti-million dollar construction claim. To assess the type of geologic and geotechnical information that would have been available t> the engineer during design,Golder was asked to conduct an independent investigation oi thy field conditions along the alignment.This work included helicopter reconnaissance work.i mapping and extensive analysis of aerial photographs using a Bausch and Lomb stereo | transfer scope. Analysis of as-built conditions showed that Golder personnel using only reconnais . techniques (no drilling)correctly predicied the actual foundation conditions 73%ot the : opposed to 53%for the previous consultant. GAL-24 Golder Associates ARRC Tunnel Rehabilitation Whittier,Alaska Baseline EAST Reference line | | | | | | __f..-j--ee | | | ». =S LR =SS UUs = 2 We : f ZL - op of Rail SS"KYNSLYINS Top of Rock '- 2 Ra: Golder Associates as prime consultant,accomplished the engineering design work for the rehabilitation of the Whittier Tunnels.These two tunnels,with a combined length of over three miles,provide the only land access to the Port ot Whitter.The Golder team was responsible tor investigating and providing remedial desiyns tor croblems relating to track structure,water seepage,drainage,icing,rock stability,and \learanves.The design required that the work be efficiently performed in short construction periods so that the track could remain in service. GAI-93 Golder Associates Bradley Lake Intertie Investigation Homer,Alaska Golder Associates completed a major geet)2 il envestigation for approximately 25 mules ot 2 KV transmission line extending from th)0°foxy Lake Hydroelectric Project to a tess : northeast of Homer,Alaska.This investi:cated a detailed photogeologic reconmars.1 soiland rock drilling,seismic evaluations v7 5°ov recommendations,liquefaction analy s+ hydrologic modeling for a river crosses id ot Rachemak Bay.as well as geotechnical foundation design for large":Powers ind Variety of subsurface t+ In addition,we conducted a major pile proytmam to evaluate the lateral ant, resistance of driven piles and pile hams.ree GALS Golder Associates Bridge 355.0 Healy Canyon,Alaska Following heavy tlooding in October of [88m the center pier of Bridge 353 in the Healy Cans. experienced a movement of greater than si.unehes over a short period of time.Due tot: severity of the movement and the potential tor catastrophic failure,the ARRC retained Gals Associates to undertake a stability evaluate rod to design remedial measures.Mapping drilling investigations in the vicinity of the 93)ot high pier showed that a failure surtace .. located in weathered,steeply-inclined Bir Ck schistunderlying the pier.The engines: solution developed by Golder Associates oo:sete fot passive steel pins grouted into bore:. both the pier and the unstable slope below.0.:eed to actin shear,these pins caused t> movements to cease,and provided a ver.cucdb solution which the railroad wats implement with its own personnel and cys it GALS Golder Associates Garner Tunnel Evaluation Healy Canyon,Alaska The ARRC mainline between Anchorage and fairbanks passes through.a 500.foot Fong tunn|referred to as Garner Tunnel at mile 356.2.{n this area,the:mainline.traverses the steep slopeofHealyCanyonandparallelsthéNenanaRiver.In additiontethehistogiclarge-scale landstidcinthecanyon,small-scale movement is net Giacommon Distress-incthe original timber and thcsignificantundercuttingofslopesbelowthetoeoelbytheNenanaRiver,prompted the ARK« to commission Golder Associates to accompli:oo coyineering stability evaluation of the tune! The emphasis of the engineering evaluat)it used on a comprehensive assessment oi uy existing tunnel support along with anise.)<0 0 tot the overall stability of the mountarne+ in an effort to identify possible large-scaic oo ite encompassing the tunnel and lockers: instability within it.The investigation «°vr Luamel consisted of a review of existic engineering and geologic reports and ©.-oss ot aerial photography,topograph:. geologic mapping,and Kinematic analys«+ GALY3 Golder Associates Geotechnical Investigation and Dynamic Pile Load Testing a Valdez,Alaska Golder Associates pertormed a geotechnical oo cstigatien tor design ota dock fag:in| The field work included onshore and ois ro doling,as welllas driving and dynam of indicator piles.The indicator piles wsce Gacd te optimize pile designs and conn. driveability.Recommendations were doe.)ps toror the toundations of onshore builds. pile supported docks.Additional reo oe dations were developed regarding,the stability of submarine slopes and the urpact ot slope instability on the pile design assessment was performed to evaluate ts cost bencit impacts of designing toro: magnitudes of seismic events. GALS 43 Golder Associates Milepost 350 Blasting Near Healy,Alaska Golder Associates provided the Alaska Railroad with general specifications and guidelines for blasting at Milepost 350 to realign the track.The site consisted of a steep,marginally stable slope Golder also monitored the blasting effort to remove the rock. GAI.93 Golder Associates Municipality of Anchorage Pavement Heave Study Anchorage,Alaska nua X Lt "3 emer ttm at SGOT:2a 2 Se Mh i nales gee RSae 4 By ee 'as ee Golder Associates evaluated pavements throughout the municipality that were experiencing significant distress shortly after being constricted The distress ranged from minor crachiny to large mounds and depressions in the pavements The most common distress was continuous longitudinal cracks,usually near the center.tthe pavement.This was found to be related to the frost heave of the pavement subgrade wis thc treeze front reached saturated or near saturated soils.The photograph shows one of the ©>.:tudinal cracks which formed within a year ot pavement construction. GAI-93 Golder Associates Municipality of Anchorage Sullivan Arena Rink Floor Repair Anchorage,Alaska Golder Associates performed a detailed geotechnical evaluation inside the Sullivan Arena to identify the cause of heaving of the refrigerated ice rink floor slab.Heaving in one corner had reached the point that a uniform ice thickness .could not be maintained,resulting in soft areas in the ice surface. Drilling and sampling were conducted through the floor :between:scheduled arena events.Instrumentation was installed within the floor slab and at depth below the floor slab to measure groundwater pressures,temperatures,and movement between various components of the floor slab system. The cause of the heaving was determined to be high pore pressures caused by an artesian aquifer at depth Continued heaving wa» expected to occur unless a major effort was made te control groundwater pressures. Golder Associates designed a more cost effective and maintenance free solution to the proble: A pile foundation system was used to suppert a suspended floor slab.This will allow continic: heave of the soils to occur without affectiny the new floor slab. GAI-93 Golder Associates Railbed Soil Sampling Alaska Railroad Seward to Fairbanks,Alaska eT nee [ea ee The Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC)controls vegetation on the railbed and right-ot-way ter a variety of reasons which contribute to tis sate operation.Golder Associates Ine.conducted a study tor ARRC of six test sites along the oe.ad te determine the concentrations of two types ot herbicides in the soils.The results wore ocd to analyze the persistence and mizration ot herbicides which had been previously appt it dhe sites. The project involved the development or +;+©quahty control and assurance procedures tor sampling and laboratory analysis.Thirty bs 7)'os were drilled and sampled at remote locaticns along the 500 mile route of the railroad bet.2 se ward and Fairbanks.Laboratory results wore analyzed to characterize the extent of conte satin at each site. GAL-593 Golder Associates Regional Drilling Waste Disposal Siting Criteria Development Prudhoe Bay,Alaska :er oe.Me 'vamaoctae.-ee ee-= -.ome .:° Golder Associates developed the criteria for selecting potential drilling waste disposal sites int} Prudhoe Bay Unit -Eastern Operating Area and Lisburne Development Area (PBU-EOA LL'A: on the North Slope of Alaska.The major categories of criteria for selecting suitable disposal sitswere:economic,operations,and maintenance considerations;long-term site stability;impa.t: vegetation;impact to wildlife;and impact to cultural resources.Subsequent to developing s° selection criteria,34 potential disposal sites were identified and ranked accordiny to the or: The preliminary criteria were then further rettned and tested in the field at several sites ..: apparently good potential.Application ot the refined criteria resulted in exclusion of 2h oi! sites.A second field inspection was then m.rde to examine the 10 sites that remained ate exclusion,and to further refine the criteria throuvh additional observation. GAI-93 Golder Associates Slope Instrumentation Trans Alaska Pipeline Alaska Golder Associates has installed geotechnical instrumentation at various locations along the Trans Alaska Pipeline where slope movement was suspected.The photograph shows one such installation in progress.The boring was louyed by a Golder engineer;and a thermistor stringy, an inclinometer casing,and sondex settlement casing were installed in each boring.These instruments were monitored until it was determined that slope movement was not occurring or impacting the performance of the pipeline GAL-93 Golder Associates Thaw Settlement Mitigation Trans Alaska Pipeline Alaska Golder Associates conducted an investigation aod analyses of an area where thawiny ice caused settlement of some pipeline supports =lice thaw->was mitigated with deep penetrationthermosyphontubesandthesettlementritesignificantlyslowed.The site is currently berm monitored using level surveys,and tostcuecntaton installed by Golder Associates [i instrumentation installed includes thernust.:+cachmometers,and sondex settlement casings The photograph shows the separation of the «:ss beam and the pipeline shoe before the rep. GALYF Golder Associates Usibelli Coal Mine Geotechnical/Hydrological Investigations Healy,Alaska Since 1984,Golder Associates has provided geotechnical and hydrologic expertise on a variety of projects involving current mining operations at Usibelli Coal Mine (UCM),which is located on the northern flanks of the Alaska Range in an area in which the relatively unconsolidated lithology,discontinuous permafrost and moderate to complex geologic structure have created unusually high rates of natural erosion and instabilities.Golder has worked closely with UCM engineering staffin developing and detendiny workable solutions to regulatory requirements for permitting and day to day operations in unique geotechnical conditions at the site. The studies that Golder has completed have been primarily conducted to address various concerns regarding hydrology (surface and subsurtace,hydrologic assessment,drainage designs and settling pond designs)and geotechnical engineering (stability analysis and designs for highwalls, spoils,regarded slopes and impoundments)Representative studies have included the following Stability analyses for proposed spoil and highwall slopes at Runaway Ridye Spoil pile and highwall stability studies for future mining in both Phase [and Phase HI areas. . Investigations of pre-existing lindslides,including review and interpretation ct pre mining aerial photography Tailings and settling pond evaluations, Mine plan studies. Surface and groundwater investigations to determine the source of wouter infiltrating the highwall. Post mining drainage plans These studies have given the firm an advanced understanding of Alaskan site conditicis geotechnical engineering considerations,particularly regarding the stability of highwalls s; and sedimentation pond embankments in cold climates. GALSS Golder Associates Valdez Creek Mine Slide Monitoring and Slope Stabilization Near Cantwell,Alaska Golder Associates was involved with an iitcil assessment of a landslide that occurred at the Valdez Creek Mine near Cantwell,Alaska [ni ddition to the initial assessment at this open pit gold mine in permafrost terrain,GA]provide |on on-site representative during mining of the deepest portion of the pit who monitored #0 mcters and other instruments to measure slope movement on a 24-hour basis.This close 5 -'e monitoring allowed work to continue under steeper slopes than had previously been 1-0 shed and resulted in increased recovery fram the ore bearing formations. GAL-93 Golder Associates PHASE 1 "PROJECT DETAIL Golder Associates pobobobeCOONODOTGONbe4HAWN@HEALY-FAIRBANKS 23Q@KV_INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PHASE 1 SCHEDULE 1994 Feb Mar aprulLiLf '" PecavnrennccversNoticetoProceed 1.0 Project Administration Data Review Study Design CriteriaGeologicMapping + Geology Ground TruthVerifySoilBoringLocationsFoundation/Anchor TypeDrillingandSampling MethodsROWObtainedbyGV + Field Locate Borings Geotechnical Borings Field and Laboratory Testing Field and Lab Results Rpt Phase 1 Report PHeweccceccccsses>peeee COONNNNGOBAONCKOWNr-OSSr-O8S8++++--+ HEALY FAIRBANKS 230KV INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY COSTS .Date:Feb 21,1994 3:53 PM Project:TEMP Report type:COST FORECAST ACTUAL VARIANCE Resource Difference Percent *1 Notice to Proceed khkik $0.00 kk kkk kkkik 2 1.0 Project Administration kakKK $4560.00 kkkkk kkk hk 3 2.0 Data Review kk kK $2800.00 kk tek oe *4 3.0 Study Design CriteriaakkRKK $3160.00 kkk KK tek kk ke 5 4.0 Geologic Mapping kk kkk $9610.00 kekkhk kk kkk 6 4.1 Geology Ground Truth kk kK $10616.00 Ra RK kkhkk *7 5.0 Verify Soil Boring LocationsakeRK $2320.00 kkk KK kk kkk 8 6.0 Foundation/Anchor TypekeaRKK $6700.00 Rk KK ake kek kt 9 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods .kk kkk $544.00 kk kkk kkk 10 7.1 ROW Obtained by GV kakke $0.00 kkkke keke *117.2 Field Locate Borings kkk $11910.00 keke kkk *12 7.3 Geotechnical Borings kk kkk §104250.00 ahhh khkk *8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing kkk $13425.00 Rake Rk kak ek *14 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt .kkekEE $9680.00 kkakk kkk *15 9.0 Phase 1 Report kkkak $25320.00 kkk kkkhe Total Project Cost: kkkik $204895.00 kkk khkhkk Project:PHASE1F Days to Complete 18 19 Rupert Tart Robert Burk Robert Dugan Mark Musial Steve Thompson Andy Garrigus Greg Eberle Drilling 1 Drilling 2 Pvc Casings Field Sample Eq Helicopter Gradation Tests Moisture Cont Atterberg Limit Thaw Consol Per Diem Truck Word Processing No No No No No No No No No No HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230KV INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROJECT RESOURCE COSTS $130.00 $130.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $60.00 $55.00 $68145.00 $201437.00 $40.00 $200.00 $3000.00 $65.00 $12.00 $75.00 $150.00 $90.00 $75.00 $45.00 Date:Feb 21, 51.00 19.00 0.00 665.00 57.00 5.00 500.00 2000.00 250.00 100.00 50.00 19.00 4.50 1994 33:42 PM Cost to Complete $ $ $ $ $ $ $6552.00 11856.00 32120.00 20152.00 $8360.00 $0.00 22440.00 68145.00 $0.00 $1400.00 $600.00 15000.00 $3250.00 $2400.00 $1875.00 $1500.00 $4500.00 $1425.00 $1620.00 ".Computer No limit $15.00 Hour 5.00 $600.00 21 Copies,Misc No limit $300.00 Use 15.00 $300.00 22 ANC-SEA Airfare No limit -$800.00 Use 5.00 $800.00 Cost to complete:$204895.00 Total cost of project:$204895.00 HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS .**Critical ** Project:PHASE1F Date:Feb 21,1994 3:59 PM *1 Notice to Proceed Early Start:Feb 28,1994 8:00 Early Finish:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM AM Duration:0.00 Days Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM AM AM Sched Start:Feb 28,1994 8:00 Sched Finish:Feb 28,1994 8:00 Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete NONE Total:$0.00 "predecessors:sts-<"tsSsSsSSS NONE * successors: 2 1.0 Project Administration Slack:64.00 Days 3 2.0 Data Review Slack:60.00 Days 42Dh43.0 Study Design Criteria Slack:0.00 Days Start: Start: Start: Start: Start: Start:ReReRR HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F Date:Feb 21,1994 3:59 PM 2 1.0 Project Administration Early Start:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Feb 28,1994 5:00 PM Duration:1.00 Day Slack:64.00 Days Late Start:May 27,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:May 27,1994 5:00 PM Sched Start:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Feb 28,1994 5:00 PM Notes: NONE Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete Rupert Tart 1.00 1.00 $130.00 Hour $1040.00 Robert Dugan 00 2.00 $110.00 Hour $1760.00 Mark Musial 00 2.00 $110.00 Hour $1760.00 Total:$4560.00 Predecessors: *1 Notice to Proceed Early Finish:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Slack:0.00 Days Late Finish:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Successors: NONE Project:PHASE1F HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS 3 2.0 Data Review Duration:1.00 Week Slack:60.00 Days Early Start: Early Finish: Late Start: Late Finish: Sched Start: Sched Finish: Resources Allocated: Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $130.00 Hour $1040. $110.00 Hour $880. $110.00 Hour $440. $110.00 Hour $440. $2800. 00 00 00 00 Name Duration Amount (days)used Robert Burk 5.00 0.20 Robert Dugan 5.00 0.20 Mark Musial 5.00 0.10 Steve Thompson 5.00 0.10 Total: Predecessors: '1 Notice to Proceed Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish: Late Finish: Feb 28,1994 8:00 Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM AM Successors: NONE Project:PHASE1F HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS ek Critical ** *4 3.0 Study Design Criteria Duration:1.00 Week Slack:0.00 Days Early Start:Feb 28, Early Finish:Mar 4, Late Start:Feb 28, Late Finish:Mar 4, Sched Start:Feb 28, Sched Finish:Mar 4, Pesources Allocated: Cost $130.00 $110.00 $110.00 Name Duration Amount (days)used Rupert Tart 5.00 0.10 Mark Musial 5.00 0.30 Steve Thompson 5.00 0.30 Total: Predecessors: *1 Notice to Proceed Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish: Late Finish: Feb 28, Feb 28,1994 1994 3:59 PM 1994 8:00 AM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 8:00 AM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 8:00 AM 1994 5:00 PM Cost to Complete $520.00 $1320.00 $1320.00 $3160.00 1994 8:00 AM 8:00 AM -uccessors: 5 4.0 Geologic Mapping Slack: *7 5.0 Verify Soil Boring Locations Slack: 55.00 Days 0.00 Days Start: Start: Start: Start: HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F Date:Feb 21,1994 3:59 PM 5 4.0 Geologic Mapping Early Start:Mar 7,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Mar 11,1994 5:00 PM Duration:1.00 Week Slack:55.00 Days Late Start:May 23,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:May 27,1994 5:00 PM Sched Start:Mar 7,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Mar 11,1994 5:00 PM Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete Robert Burk 5.00 1.00 $130.00 Hour $5200.00 Robert Dugan 5.00 0.50 $110.00 Hour $2200.00 Mark Musial 5.00 0.10 $110.00 Hour $440.00 Rupert Tart 5.00 0.10 $130.00 Hour $520.00 ANC-SEA Airfare 5.00 1.00 $800.00 Use $800.00 Per Diem 5.00 1.00 $90.00 Day $450.00 Total:$9610.00 Predecessors: *4 3.0 Study Design Criteria Early Finish:Mar 4,1994 5:00 PM Slack:0.00 Days Late Finish:Mar 4,1994 5:00 PM Successors: NONE HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F 6 4.1 Geology Ground Truth Duration:2.00 Days Slack:33.00 Days Resources Allocated: Amount used 1.20 1.00 1.00 2.00 Early Start:Apr Early Finish:Apr Late Start:May Late Finish:May Sched Start:Apr Sched Finish:Apr Cost Cost Basis $130.00 Hour $110.00 Hour $3000.00 Day $90.00 Day Cost toNameDuration (days) Robert Burk 2.00 Robert Dugan 2.00 Helicopter 2.00 Per Diem 2.00 Total: Predecessors: *12 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish: Late Finish: 8,1994 5:00 8,1994 5:00 Successors: NONE HEALY- FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project:PHASE1F ACTIVITY DETAILS **Critical ** *7 5.0 Verify Soil Boring Locations Duration: Slack: 2.00 Days 0.00 Days Early Start: Early Finish: Late Late Start: Finish: Sched Start: Sched Finish: Pesources Allocated: Cost $130.00 $110.00 $110.00 00 00 00 Name Duration (days) Rupert Tart 2.00 Mark Musial 2.00 Robert Dugan 2.00 Total: Predecessors: *4 3.0 Study Design Criteria Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish: Late Finish: Mar Mar 21,1994 3:59 7,1994 8:00 8,1994 5:00 7,1994 8:00 8,1994 5:00 7,1994 8:00 8,1994 5:00 Cost to Complete $208. $352. $1760. $2320. 4,1994 5:00 4,1994 5:00 PM PM * accessors: 9 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods Slack: 10 7.1 ROW Obtained by GV Slack: 0.00 Days 58.00 Days 10 - Start: Start: Start: Start: Mar May 5:00 PM 5:00 PM HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F 8 6.0 Foundation/Anchor Type Duration:1.00 Week Slack:10.00 Days Early Start:May 9,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:May 13,1994 5:00 PM Late Start:May 23,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:May 27,1994 5:00 PM Sched Start:May 9,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:May 13,1994 5:00 PM Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount (days)used Rupert Tart 5.00 0.20 Mark Musial 5.00 0.30 Steve Thompson 5.00 0.60 Greg Eberle 5.00 0.50 Computer 5.00 1.00 Cost -Cost .Cost to Basis Complete $130.00 Hour $1040.00 $110.00 Hour $1320.00 $110.00 Hour $2640.00 $55.00 Hour .$1100.00 $15.00 Hour $600.00 $6700.00 Predecessors: *14 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish:May 6,1994 5:00 PM Late Finish:May 6,1994 5:00 PM Successors: NONE -ll1- HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS **Critical ** Project:PHASE1F Date:Feb 21,1994 3:59 PM *9 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods Early Start:Mar 9,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Mar 9,1994 5:00 PM Duration:1.00 Day Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Mar 9,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:Mar 9,1994 5:00 PM Sched Start:Mar 9,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Mar 9,1994 5:00 PM Notes:- NONE ™esources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete Rupert Tart 1.00 0.10 $130.00 Hour $104.00 Robert Dugan 1.00 0.50 $110.00 Hour $440.00 Total:$544.00 Predecessors: *7 5.0 Verify Soil Boring Locations Early Finish:Mar 8,1994 5:00 PM Slack:0.00 Days Late Finish:Mar 8,1994 5:00 PM 12 uccessors: *117.2 Field Locate Borings Slack:0.00 Days Early Start: Late Start: -13- Mar 10,1994 Mar 10,1994 HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F 10 7.1 ROW Obtained by GV Duration:0.00 Days Slack:58.00 Days Resources Allocated: Duration Amount (days)used Name Predecessors: *7 5.0 Verify Soil Boring Locations Slack:0.00 Days Date:Feb 21, Early Start:Mar 8, Early Finish:Mar 8, Late Start:May 27, Late Finish:May 27, Sched Start:Mar 8, Sched Finish:Mar 8, Cost Cost Basis Early Finish:Mar 8, Late Finish:Mar 8, 1994 3:59 PM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 5:00 PM 1994 5:00 PM Cost to Complete $0.00 1994 5:00 PM 1994 5:00 PM Successors: NONE -14= HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS ak Critical ** Project:PHASE1F Date:Feb 21,1994 3:59 PM *11 7.2 Field Locate Borings Early Start:Mar 10,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Mar 14,1994 5:00 PM Duration:3.00 Days Poe , Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Mar 10,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:Mar 14,1994 5:00 PM Sched'Start:Mar 10,.1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Mar 14,1994 5:00 PM Notes: NONE -in --i -esources Allocated:-a Name Duration Amount Cost _Cost Cost to (days)used oe ;Basis Complete Robert Dugan 3.00 1.00 "$110.00 Hour $2640.00 Helicopter 3.00 1.00 $3000.00 Day-$9000.00 Per Diem 3.00.1.00 .990.00Day”_..$270.00 Total:$11910.00 Predecessors; *9 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods Early Finish:Mar 9,1994 5:00 PM Late Finish:Mar 9,1994 5:00 PMSlack:0.00 Days. successors: *12 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Early Start:Mar 15,1994 8:00 AM Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Mar 15,1994 8:00 AM -16- HEALY FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F zk Critical ** *12 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Duration:19.00 Days Slack:0.00 Days -Pesources Allocated: Amount used 1.00 1.50 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 35.00 Cost to Complete $16720.00 $12540.00 $68145.00 $3420.00 $1425.00 $600.00 $1400.00 Name Duration (days) Robert Dugan 19.00 Greg Eberle 19.00 Drilling 1 19.00 Per Diem 19.00 Truck 19.00 Field Sample Eq 19.00 PVC Casings 19.00 Total: _Predecessors: *117.2 Field Locate Borings Slack:0.00 Days 17 Date:Feb 21, Early Start:Mar 15, Early Finish:Apr 8, Late Start:Mar 15, Late Finish:Apr 8, Sched Start:Mar 15, Sched Finish:Apr 8, Cost Cost Basis $110.00 Hour $55.00 Hour $68145.00 Fixed $90.00 Day $75.00 Day $200.00 Use $40.00 Use Early Finish:Mar 14, Late Finish:Mar 14, 1994 1994 5:00 PM 5:00 PM _accessors: 6 4.1 Geology Ground Truth Slack: *13 8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing Slack: 33.00 Days 0.00 Days 18 - Start: Start: Start: Start: <2 ©oe om oe oe Oe oe oe om wm oe 08 we Oe Oe 8 et ee we we oe 8 8 oe Oe oe we oe et ee we Oe et ee ee ee ee ew we HEALY FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE1F zk Critical ** *13 8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing Duration:2.00 Weeks Slack:0.00 Days Early Start:Apr 11,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Apr 22,1994 5:00 PM Late Start:Apr ll,1994 8:00 AM Late Finish:Apr 22,1994 5:00 PM Sched Start:Apr 11,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Apr 22,1994 5:00 PM -esources Allocated: Name Duration (days) Moisture Cont 10.00 Gradation Tests 10.00 Atterberg Limit 10.00 Thaw Consol 10.00 Greg Eberle 10.00 Total: Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $12.00 Use $2400.00 $65.00 Use $3250.00 $75.00 Use $1875.00 $150.00 Use $1500.00 $55.00 Hour $4400.00 $13425.00 Predecessors: *12 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Slack:0.00 Days 19 - Early Finish:Apr 8,1994 5:00 PM Late Finish:Apr 8,1994 5:00 PM -uccessors:; *14 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Early Start:Apr 25,1994 8:00 AM Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Apr 25,1994 8:00 AM -20- HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS ae Critical ** Project:PHASEI1F Date:Feb 21,1994 3:59 PM *14 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Early Start:Apr 25,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:May 6,1994 5:00 PM Duration:10.00 Days " Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Apr 25,1994 8:00 AM w Late Finish:May 6,1994 5:00 PM "Sched Start:Apr 25,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:May 6,1994 5:00 PM "esources Allocated: -Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete Mark Musial 10.00 0.60 $110.00 Hour $5280.00 Greg Eberle.-.-10.00 1.00 .$55.00 Hour $4400.00 Total:$9680.00 Predecessors:| *13 8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing Early Finish:Apr 22,1994 5:00 PM Slack:0.00 Days Late Finish:Apr 22,1994 5:00 PM -21- -uccessors: 8 6.0 Foundation/Anchor Type Slack:10.00 Days *15 9.0 Phase 1 Report Slack:0.00 Days -22 Start: Start: Start: Start: May 9, May 23, May 9, May 9, Project:PHASE1F HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS ak Critical ** Early Start: Early Finish: *15 9.0 Phase 1 Report Duration:15.00 Days Slack:0.00 Days Late Late Start: Finish: Sched Start: Sched Finish: "esources Allocated: n Amount used 0.20 0.30 0.70 0.20 0.30 1.00 0.30 Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $130.00 Hour $3120.00 $110.00 Hour $3960.00 $110.00 Hour $9240.00 $130.00 Hour $3120.00 $45.00 Hour $1620.00 $300.00 Use $300.00 $110.00 Hour $3960.00 $25320.00 Name Duratio (days) Rupert Tart 15.00 Robert Dugan 15.00 Mark Musial 15.00 Robert Burk 15.00 Word Processing 15.00 Copies,Misc 15.00 Steve Thompson 15.00 Total: Predecessors: *14 8.1 Field and Lab Resul Slack:0.00 Days ts Rpt -23- Early Finish: Finish: May 6,1994 5:00 PM May 6,1994 5:00 PM uccessors: NONE -24- PHASE 2 PROJECT DETAIL Golder Associates HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230KV TERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIvoATION PHASE 2 SCHEDULE 1995 Oct.Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May144ai|3 i 4 CONCAON10 COONNNNOOAONESotice to Proceed OrGUNEGOGGSSSProject Administration Data Review Finalize Design CriteriaUpdateGeologicMapping .Determine Soil Boring Locations Finalize Foundation/Anchor DesignDrillingandSamplingMethods ROW Obtained by GV Field Locate Borings Geotechnical Borings .Field and Laboratory Testing Field and Lab Results Rpt Phase 2 Report Oe68£2£028OFBBOsBEBF8B/YxwweWYWeeVEYVYVeece-_ HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230KY /TERTIE GEOTECHNICAL.INVESTIGATION PHASE 2 SCHEDULE 1996 aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan T ¥t ¥'r Notice to Proceed 1.@ Project Administration 2.@ Data Review 3.@ Finalize Design Criteria ++++++4.@ Update Geologic Mapping5.@ Determine Soil Boring Locations6.0 Finalize Foundation/Anchor Design7.90 Drilling and Sampling Methods7.1 ROW Obtained by GY ++++++7.2 Field Locate Borings7.3 Geotechnical Borings8.@ Field and Laboratory Testing8.1 Field and Lab Results Apt 9.@ Phase 2 Reporta_a-_paofafunffAWNbe©60C00301ONDbo HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230KV INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY COSTS Project:TEMP Date:Feb 21,199 Report type:COST VARIANCE Difference 4 4:47 PM Percent 1 Notice to Proceed 1.0 kkkkk Project Administration kkkkk Data Review kaeekk Finalize Design Criteria kkekekk Update Geologic Mapping kkk Determine Soil Boring Locations khhkk Finalize Foundation/Anchor Design khhk Drilling and Sampling Methods hk kk ROW Obtained by GV khhhk Field Locate Borings kkk Geotechnical Borings khkkrkk Field and Laboratory Testing kak $0.00 $9120.00 $2800.00 $3160.00 $9610.00 $2320.00 $10720.00 $544.00 $0.00 $11910.00 $159895.00 $23650.00 kakkkk kaeaKK kkakk kkkekk khkkak kkreak kkk kakkekk kkk kkk khkhkknk kaki kkk kkkke kkhkkk elialialiadal kkkkk kkKKS kkkkk kkkik kakkk kkkkk wkekkk kerk *,8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt kaRKE $19360.00 kk ke kkk tk *14 9.0 Phase 2 Report > kkkkk $25320.00 kha RkK Total Project Cost:kRkkRK $278409.00 kk kkk Rake Project:PHASE2F HEALY-FAIRBANKS 230KV INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROJECT RESOURCE COSTS Date:Feb 21, Days to Complete 1994 4:38 PM Cost to Complete 18 19 Rupert Tart Robert Burk Robert Dugan Mark Musial Steve Thompson Andy Garrigus Greg Eberle Drilling 1 Drilling 2 Pvc Casings Field Sample Eq Helicopter Gradation Tests Moisture Cont Atterberg Limit Thaw Consol Per Diem Truck Word Processing No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No $130.00 $130.00- $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $60.00 $55.00 $68145.00 $201437.00 $40.00 $200.00 $3000.00 $65.00 $12.00 $75.00 $150.00 $90.00 $75.00 $45.00 109.00 50.00 0.00 1750.00 150.00 3.00 1000.00 5000.00 500.00 200.00 108.00 50.00 4.50 $8216.00 $9360.00 $59400.00 $27984.00 $9944.00 $0.00 $47960.00 $68145.00 $0.00 $1400.00 $600.00 $9000.00 $6500.00 $6000.00 $3750.00 $3000.00 $9720.00 $3750.00 $1620.00 1 Computer |No limit $15.00 Hour 8.00 $960.00 21 Copies,Misc No limit $300.00 Use 15.00 $300.00 22 ANC-SEA Airfare No limit $800.00 Use 5.00 $800.00 Cost to complete:$278409.00 Total cost of project:$278409.00 HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F °Date:Feb 21,1994 4:54 PM 1 Notice to Proceed Early Start:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Duration:0.00 Days Slack:224.00 Days Late Start:Jan 6,1995 8:00 AM Late Finish:Jan 6,1995 8:00 AM AM AM Sched Start:Nov 1,1994 8:00 Sched Finish:Nov 1,1994 8:00 Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete NONE Total:$0.00 Predecessors: NONE Successors: 2 1.0 Project Administration Early Start:Nov 1,1994 8:00 AM Slack:163.00 Days Late Start:Jun 16,1995 8:00 AM 3 2.0 Data Review Early Start:Nov 1,1994 8:00 AM Slack:48.00 Days Late Start:Jan 6,1995 8:00 AM HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F 2 1.0 Project Administration Duration:1.00 Day Slack:163.00 Days Early Start:Nov 1, Early Finish:Nov 1, Late Late Start:Jun 16, Finish:Jun 16, Sched Start:Nov 1, Sched Finish:Nov 1, Resources Allocated: Cost $130.00 Hour $110.00 Hour $110.00 Hour Cost to Complete $2080.00 $3520.00 $3520.00 Name Duration (days) Rupert Tart 1.00 Robert Dugan 1.00 Mark Musial 1.00 Total: Predecessors: 1 Notice to Proceed Slack:224.00 Days Early Finish:Feb 28, Late Finish:Jan 6, 1994 8:00 AM 1995 8:00 AM Successors: NONE HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F 3 2.0 Data Review Duration:1.00 Week Slack:48.00 Days Early Start: Early Finish: Late Start: Late Finish: Sched Start: Sched Finish: Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $130.00 Hour $1040.00 $110.00 Hour $880.00 $110.00 Hour $440.00 $110.00 Hour $440.00 $2800.00 (days)used Robert Burk 5.00 0.20 Robert Dugan 5.00 0.20 Mark Musial 5.00 0.10 Steve Thompson 5.00 0.10 Total: Predecessors: 1 Notice to Proceed Slack:224.00 Days Early Finish: Late Finish: Feb 28,1994 8:00 AM Jan 6,1995 8:00 AM successors: 4 3.0 Finalize Design Criteria Early Start:Nov 8,1994 8:00 AM Slack:48.00 Days Late Start:Jan 13,1995 8:00 AM HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F -Date:Feb 21,1994 4:54 PM 4 3.0 Finalize Design Criteria Early Start:Nov'8,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Nov 14,1994 5:00 PM Duration:1.00 Week Slack:48.00 Days Late Start:Jan 13,1995 8:00 AM Late Finish:Jan 19,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:Nov'8,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Nov 14,1994 5:00 PM Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete Rupert Tart 5.00 0.10 $130.00 Hour $520.00 Mark Musial 5.00 0.30 $110.00 Hour $1320.00 Steve Thompson 5.00 0.30 $110.00 Hour $1320.00 Total:$3160.00 Predecessors: 3 2.0 Data Review Early Finish:Nov 7,1994 5:00 PM Slack:48.00 Days Late Finish:Jan 12,1995 5:00 PM successors: 5 4.0 Update Geologic Mapping Early Start:Nov 15,1994 8:00 AM Slack:48.00 Days .Late Start:Jan 20,1995 8:00 AM HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F 5 4.0 Update Geologic Mapping Durdtion:1.00 Week Slack:48.00 Days Early Start:Nov 15, Early Finish:Nov 21, Late Start:Jan 20, Late Finish:Jan 26, Sched Start:Nov 15, Sched Finish:Nov 21, Resources Allocated: Name Duration (days) Robert Burk 5.00 Robert Dugan 5.00 Mark Musial 5.00 Rupert Tart 5.00 ANC-SEA Airfare 5.00 Per Diem 5.00 Total: Predecessors: 4 3.0 Finalize Design Criteria Slack:48.00 Days Cost $130.00 $110.00 $110.00 $130.00 $800.00 $90.00 Early Finish:Nov 14, Late Finish:Jan 19, Cost to Complete $5200.00 $2200.00 $440.00 $520.00 $800.00 $450.00 1994 5:00 PM 1995 5:00 PM successors: 6 5.0 Determine Soil Boring Locations Early Start:Nov 22,1994 8:00 AM Slack:48.00 Days Late Start:Jan 27,1995 8:00 AM HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F °Date:Feb 21,1994 4:54 PM 6 5.0 Determine Soil Boring Locations Early Start:Nov 22,1994 8:00 AM Early Finish:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PM Duration:2.00 Days Slack:48.00 Days Late Start:Jan 27,1995 8:00 AM Late Finish:Jan 30,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:Nov 22,1994 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PM Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete Rupert Tart 2.00 0.10 $130.00 Hour $208.00 Mark Musial 2.00 0.20 $110.00 Hour $352.00 Robert Dugan 2.00 1.00 $110.00 Hour $1760.00 Total:$2320.00 Predecessors: 5 4.0 Update Geologic Mapping Early Finish:Nov 21,1994 5:00 PM Slack:48.00 Days Late Finish:Jan 26,1995 5:00 PM successors: 8 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods Slack:48.00 Days » 9 7.1 ROW Obtained by GV Slack:147.00 Days Me. -10 - Start: Start: Start: Start: 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM HEALY FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F 7 6.0 Finalize Foundation/Anchor Design Duration:8.00 Days Slack:7.00 Days Early Start:May 29,1995 8:00 AM Early Finish:Jun 7,1995 5:00 PM Late Start:Jun 7,1995 8:00 AM Late Finish:Jun 16,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:May 29,1995 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Jun 7,1995 5:00 PM Resources Allocated: Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $130.00 Hour $1664.00 $110.00 Hour $2112.00 $110.00 Hour $4224.00 $55.00 Hour $1760.00 $15.00 Hour $960.00 $10720.00 Name Duration Amount (days)used Rupert Tart 8.00 0.20 Mark Musial 8.00 0.30 Steve Thompson 8.00 0.60 Greg Eberle 8.00 0.50 Computer 8.00 1.00 Total: Predecessors: *13 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish:May 26,1995 5:00 PM Late Finish:May 26,1995 5:00 PM Successors: NONE HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F 8 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods Duration: Slack: 1.00 Day 48.00 Days Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount (days)used Rupert Tart 1.00 0.10 Robert Dugan 1.00 0.50 Total: Predecessors: 6 5.0 Determine Soil Boring Locations Slack:48.00 Days Successors: 10 7.2 Field Locate Borings Slack:48.00 Days 12 - Date:Feb 21, Early Start:Nov 24, Early Finish:Nov 24, Late Start:Jan 31, Late Finish:Jan 31, Sched Start:Nov 24, Sched Finish:Nov 24, Cost Cost Basis $130.00 Hour $110.00 Hour Early Finish: Late Finish: Early Start:Nov 25, Late Start:Feb 1, 4:54 PM Cost to Complete $104.00 $440.00 $544.00 1994 5:00 PM 1995 5:00 PM 1994 8:00 AM 1995 8:00 AM HEALY FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F Date:Feb 21,1994 4:54 PM 9 7.1 ROW Obtained by GV Early Start:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PM Early Finish:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PMDuration:0.00 Days Slack:147.00 Days Late Start:Jun 16,1995 5:00 PM Late Finish:Jun 16,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PM Sched Finish:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PM Notes: NONE "Resources Allocated:4,t-<"'sé'S™S™S™*™*™”™”™”OOOOO Name Duration Amount Cost Cost Cost to (days)used Basis Complete NONE Total:$0.00 "predecessors! 6 5.0 Determine Soil Boring Locations Early Finish:Nov 23,1994 5:00 PM Slack:48.00 Days Late Finish:Jan 30,1995 5:00 PM "guecessors: NONE -13- HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F 10 7.2 Field Locate Borings Duration: Slack: 3.00 Days 48.00 Days Early Start: Early Finish:Nov 29, Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount (days)used Robert Dugan 3.00 1.00 Helicopter 3.00 1.00 Per Diem 3.00 1.00 Total: Predecessors: 8 7.0 Drilling and Sampling Methods Slack:48.00 Days 14 Late Start:Feb 1,1995 8:00 AM Late Finish:Feb 3,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:Feb 1,1995 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Feb 3,1995 5:00 PM Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $110.00 Hour $2640.00 $3000.00 Day $9000.00 $90.00 Day $270.00 $11910.00 Early Finish:Nov 24,1994 5:00 PM Late Finish:Jan 31,1995 5:00 PM successors: *11 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Early Start:Feb 6,1995 8:00 AM Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Feb 6,1995 8:00 AM -15- HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project:PHASE2F ACTIVITY DETAILS *k*Critical ** *11 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Duration:50.00 Days Slack:0.00 Days Early Start:Feb 6,1995 8:00 AM Early Finish:Apr 14,1995 5:00 PM Start:Feb 6,1995 8:00 AM Finish:Apr 14,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:Feb 6,1995 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Apr 14,1995 5:00 PM NONE Resources Allocated: Cost Cost to Basis Complete $110.00 Hour $44000.00 $55.00 Hour $33000.00 $68145.00 Fixed $68145.00 $90.00 Day $9000.00 $75.00 Day $3750.00 $200.00 Use $600.00 $40.00 Use $1400.00 $159895.00 Name Duration Amount (days)used Robert Dugan 50.00 1.00 Greg Eberle 50.00 1.50 Drilling 1 50.00 1.00 Per Diem 50.00 2.00 Truck 50.00 1.00 Field Sample Eq 50.00 3.00 PVC Casings 50.00 35.00 Total: Predecessors: 10 7.2 Field Locate Borings Slack:48.00 Days 16 Early Finish:Nov 29,1994 5:00 PM Finish:Feb 3,1995 5:00 PM vuccessors: *12 8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing Early Start:Apr 17,1995 8:00 AM Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:Apr 17,1995 8:00 AM -17- HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F ke Critical ** Date:Feb 21,1994 4:54 PM *12 8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing Duration:2.00 Weeks Slack:0.00 Days Early Start:Apr 17,1995 8:00 AM Early Finish:Apr 28,1995 5:00 PM Late Start:Apr 17,1995 8:00 AM Late Finish:Apr 28,1995 5:00 PM Sched Start:Apr 17,1995 8:00 AM Sched Finish:Apr 28,1995 5:00 PM Resources Allocated: Name Duration (days) Moisture Cont 10.00 Gradation Tests 10.00 Atterberg Limit 10.00 Amount used 500.00 100.00 50.00 20.00 1.00 Cost Cost Cost to Basis Complete $12.00 Use $6000.00 $65.00 Use $6500.00 $75.00 Use $3750.00 $150.00 Use $3000.00 $55.00 Hour $4400.00 $23650.00 Thaw Consol 10.00 Greg Eberle 10.00 Total: Predecessors: *11 7.3 Geotechnical Borings Slack:0.00 Days 18 Early Finish:Apr 14,1995 5:00 PM Late Finish:Apr 14,1995 5:00 PM w wuccessors: *13 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Early Start:May 1,1995 8:00 AM Slack:0.00 Days .Late Start:May 1,1995 8:00 AM HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS Project:PHASE2F ek Critical ** *13 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Duration:20.00 Days Slack:0.00 Days Resources Allocated: Amount used Date:Feb 21, Early Start:May 1, Early Finish:May 26, Late Start:May 1, Late Finish:May 26, Sched Start:May 1, Sched Finish:May 26, Cost cost Basis $110.00 Hour $55.00 Hour Name Duration (days) Mark Musial 20.00 Greg Eberle 20.00 Total: Predecessors: /*12 8.0 Field and Laboratory Testing Slack:0.00 Days Early Finish: Late Finish: Apr 28, Apr 28, -20- 1994 4:54 1995 8:00 1995 5:00 1995 8:00 1995 5:00 1995 8:00 1995 5:00 Cost to Complete $10560. $8800. $19360 1995 5:00 1995 5:00 successors: 7 6.0 Finalize Foundation/Anchor Design Early Slack: *14 9.0 Phase 2 Report Slack: 7.00 Days 0.00 Days -21- Start:May 29, Start:Jun 7, Start:May 29, Start:May 29, HEALY-FAIRBANKS INTERTIE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITY DETAILS *k Critical ** Cost to Complete 1995 $3120.00 $3960.00 $9240.00 $3120.00 $1620.00 $300.00 $3960.00 5:00 PM Project:PHASE2F Date:Feb 21, *14 9.0 Phase 2 Report Early Start:May 29, Early Finish:Jun 16, Duration:15.00 Days Slack:0.00 Days Late Start:May 29, Late Finish:Jun 16, Sched Start:May 29, Sched Finish:Jun 16, Notes: NONE Resources Allocated: Name Duration Amount Cost Cost (days)used Basis Rupert Tart 15.00 0.20 $130.00 Hour Robert Dugan 15.00 0.30 $110.00 Hour Mark Musial 15.00 0.70 $110.00 Hour Robert Burk 15.00 0.20 $130.00 Hour Word Processing 15.00 0.30 $45.00 Hour Copies,Misc 15.00 1.00 $300.00 Use Steve Thompson 15.00 0.30 $110.00 Hour Total: Predecessors: *13 8.1 Field and Lab Results Rpt Early Finish:May 26, Slack:0.00 Days Late Finish:May 26, -22- 1995 5:00 PM -uccessors: NONE -23- 02/21/94 17:54 503 226 o079 ATER WYNNE 002/020 DRAFT Lae 02/21/94 1:54pm 1993 ALASKA INTERTIE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN INTERTIE PARTICIPANTS GROUP AND GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC. 02/21/94 17:54 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 003/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement")is made and entered into this __ day of ,1994,by and between the Intertie Participants Group ("IPG"),the entity formed in accordance with the terms of the Participants Agreement (as defined in this Agreement)consisting of representatives of The Municipality of Anchorage d/b/a Municipal Light and Power,the Chugach Electric Association,Inc.,The Municipality of Fairbanks d/b/a Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System,the Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc.,the Homer Electric Association,Inc.,Matanuska Electric Association, Inc.and The City of Seward d/b/a Seward Electric System ("IPG Members") and the Golden Valley Electric Association ("GVEA").Both IPG and GVEA sometimes are referred to individually as "Party”and collectively as "Parties”. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the State of Alaska ("State")has by statute authorized, and has partially funded,the design and construction of a 138 kV (minimum) transmission line between Healy,Alaska and Fairbanks (hereinafter called the "Healy-Fairbanks Segment”or "Segment");and WHEREAS,the IPG Members,the Alaska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative,Inc.("AEG&T")and the State,acting through the Department of Administration and the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority,have entered into the Intertie Grant Agreement ("Intertie Grant Agreement"),dated October 20,1993 under which the IPG Members and AEG&T have agreed to contract with GVEA to design and construct the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and requires that the IPG be formed for the purpose of exercising the rights and responsibilities of the owners and to provide oversight of GVEA's construction efforts;and 1 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:54 @503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 004/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm WHEREAS,the IPG Members and AEG&T have entered into the Participation Agreement,dated January __,1994 ("Participation Agreement") which designates GVEA as the Construction Manager of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment,forms the IPG and provides for the basic requirements for budgeting and oversight by the IPG regarding GVEA's construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and provides for a means of financing the remaining cost of the Segment by AIDEA or the Participants;and WHEREAS,in order to assure that the IPG and GVEA meet their obligations under the Intertie Grant Agreement and the Participation Agreement,the Parties desire to detail GVEA's responsibilities as Construction Manager for the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and the procedures necessary to assure that the IPG provides oversight of the design and construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment. NOW,THEREFORE,IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants set forth herein,the Parties agree as follows: SECTION 1.TERM. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement,this Agreement shall become effective upon the Effective Date and shall continue until the Final Acceptance Date terminated as provided for herein;provided,that all obligations incurred hereunder shall be preserved until satisfied. SECTION 2.DEEINITIONS. Whenever used in this Agreement the following terms shall have the meaning stated below: (a)"Agreement"shall mean this Construction Management Agreement. (b)"Commercial Operation Date"means the date that GVEA declares that the Healy-Fairbanks Segment is ready to operate at rated capacity on a commercial basis. 2 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:54 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 005/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm (c)"Construction Budget"means the annual budget for Design and Construction Costs approved by the IPG in accordance with the Participants Agreement. (d)"Construction Schedule"means the schedule prepared by GVEA under Section . (e)"Construction Year"means calendar year,except that the initial Construction Year shall begin on the effective date of this Agreement and the final Construction Year shall end on the termination of this Agreement. (f)"Design and Construction Costs”means all capital costs of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment,including but not limited to planning, permitting,design,acquisition of real property interest,construction, equipment,testing,and insurance costs and payment of claims, regulatory activities,judgments,settlements,or claims,legal and consulting costs,GVEA's direct labor costs (including associated payroll benefits)and equipment costs related to design and construction and GVEA administrative and general overhead,including construction overhead,of 0.5%of the sum of the other Design and Construction Costs contained in an approved Construction Budget. (g)"Effective Date”means January _,1994. (h)"Final Acceptance Date"means the date that all design and construction of the Project has been completed and GVEA has made final payment to its contractors for the design,construction and to GVEA for its obligations under this Agreement. (i)"Grant Account”means the $43,200,000 appropriated by Section 1 of Ch.19,SLA 1993,for payment as a grant under AS 37.05.316 for construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and accrued interest. (j)"Prudent Utility Practice”means at a particular time any of thepractices,methods and acts engaged in or approved by a significantportionoftheelectricutilityindustryatsuchtime,or which,in the 3 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:35 503 228 0079 ATER WYNNE 006.020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm exercise af reasonable judgment in light of facts known at such time, could have been expected to accomplish the desired results at the lowest reasonable cost consistent with good business practices, reliability,safety and reasonable expedition.Prudent Utility Practice is not required to be the optimum practice,method or act to the exclusion of all others,but rather to be a spectrum of possible practices,method or acts which could have been expected to accomplish the desired result at the lowest reasonable cost consistent with reliability,safety and expedition.Prudent Utility Practice includes due regard for manufacturers'warranties and the requirements of governmental agencies of competent jurisdiction and shall apply not only to functional parts of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment,but also to appropriate structures,landscaping,painting,signs,lighting and other facilities. (k)|"Uncontrollable Force”means any cause beyond the control of a Party hereto and which by the exercise of due diligence that Party is unable to prevent or overcome,including but not limited to an act of God,fire,flood,volcano,earthquake,explosion,sabotage,and act of the public enemy,civil or military authority,including court orders, injunction and orders of governmental agencies of competent jurisdiction,insurrection riot,an act of the elements,failure of equipment,or the inability to obtain or ship equipment or materials because of the effect of similar causes on carriers or shippers.Strikes, lockouts,and other labor disturbances shall be considered Uncontrollable Forces,and nothing in this Agreement shall require either Party to settle a labor dispute against its best judgment; provided,that during any labor dispute each Party shall make all reasonable efforts under the circumstances,including,to the extent permitted by law,the use of replacement personne!and or management personnel and/or other personnel under the provisions of a mutual aid agreement,to ensure,if possible the continued ability of the Parties to carry out their obligations under this Agreement. SECTION 3.CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. (a)Aas Constructi nager.GVEA shall serve as the Construction Manager of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment for the term 4 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:55 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 21007020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm hereof,unless GVEA gives written notice to the IPG of its election to terminate this Agreement,or the IPC removes GVEA as Construction Manager pursuant to the terms of the Participation Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Participation Agreement,GVEA shall be solely responsible for selection and supervising any contractor employed to design or construct the Healy-Fairbanks Segment. (b)Management of Design and Construction.GVEA shall manage the design and construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment in accordance with Prudent Utility Practice. (c)Reports to the IPG.GVEA shall submit monthly reports to the IPG setting out in sufficient detail the status of the design and construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment.Such report shall provide a comparison of the actual construction completed to the scheduled completion and a comparison of the actual total expenditures to the amounts budgeted.In addition,GVEA shall immediately inform the members of the IPG by fax regarding any design or construction problems encountered which,in the opinion of GVEA,might result in significant litigation,require a change order in excess of $50,000 or a significant deviation in the schedule for completion of the Segment. SECTION 4.SCOPE,PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND SCHEDULE,DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PROJECT SCHEDULE. (a)Design of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment. (1)The Scope of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment Design/Construction has been approved by GVEA and the IPG as set forth in Exhibit B.In addition the IPG has approved GVEA's proceeding with certain contracts with consultants in advance of the execution of this Agreement to allow timely preparation of a preliminary budget and schedule pursuant to Paragraph (2) below. (2)GVEA shall proceed with the design of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and the development of a preliminary budget and 5 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:55 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE ig]008/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm schedule upon the execution of this Agreement.GVEA shall provide a preliminary and budget for the Segment based upon the Scope of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment Design/Construction attached as Exhibit B for IPG approval by May 1,1994. (b)Design and Construction Costs and Project Schedule.Upon IPG approval of the preliminary budget and schedule under Paragraph (2) above,GVEA shall proceed with the completion of the design plans and specifications for the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and the acquisition of necessary land rights and provide the IPG its estimate of the Design and Construction Costs and Project Schedule by May 1,1995.Upon IPG approval of the Design and Construction Costs and the Project Schedule,GVEA shall proceed with the construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment. SECTION 5.CONSTRUCTION BUDGETS. (a)Budget Form.GVEA shall prepare a Construction Budget for each calendar year during the term hereof as provided in this section. Each Construction Budget shall be prepared in the format shown in Exhibit A. (b)Preliminary Construction Budget.GVEA shall prepare and submit a preliminary Construction Budget to the IPG concurrently with the execution of this Agreement which shall be deemed to be approved on the execution of this Agreement.Such preliminary Construction Budget shall provide an estimate of costs incurred or to be incurred by GVEA prior to the approval of the preliminary Design and Construction Costs submitted to the IPG under Section 4(b). (c)Annual Construction Budget. (1)Concurrent with the submission of preliminary Design and Construction Costs under Section 4(b),GVEA shall submit a Construction Budget for its costs incurred or to be incurred or committed in 1994 for approval of the IPG.Any amounts included in the preliminary Construction Budget for costs that GVEA has incurred or is obligated that have been previously 6 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:56 ®503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 009/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm approved by the IPG shall be a part of the 1994 Construction Budget without further approval by the IPG. (2)On or before November 1,1994 and each subsequent November 1 during the term hereof,GVEA shall submit to the IPG a proposed Construction Budget for review and approval. (3)Each Construction Budget,at GVEA's request shall include an amount of working capital as requested by GVEA not to exceed $,to assure timely payment of design and construction expenses by GVEA. (d)IPG Approval Construction Budgets.The IPG shall approve or disapprove the Construction Budgets submitted pursuant to Section 5(c)within 30 days after submission by GVEA.If the IPG disapproves a Construction Budget,it shall provide GVEA an explanation of the items in the Construction Budget it disapproves and any alternative item that it would approve.The IPG's disapproval may be submitted by GVEA for resolution pursuant to Section 9. (e)Revision of Construction Budget by GVEA.GVEA may request a revision to the Construction Budget at any time during a Construction Year.The IPG shall approve or disapprove such revision within 30 days after receipt.The IPG's disapproval may be submitted by GVEA for resolution pursuant to Section 9. (f)Limitation on Expenditures and Intra-Budget Transfers.GVEA shall not incur costs or obligate funds in excess of the amounts included in the then effective Construction Budget.Any material intra- budget transfer (over $)of budgeted funds shall be treated as a Construction Budget revision under Section 5(e). (g)Change Orders.GVEA may agree to change orders with its contractors if (i)the proposed change order is not expected to affect Segment capacity,general routing,points of interconnection or basic design of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment,(ii)the change order does not exceed $50,000 in additional cost,or (iii)the aggregate of all change orders in the Construction Year do not cause budgeted costs to exceed 7 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:56 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 010/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm the Construction Budget for such Construction Year.Any other change order shall not be effective until approved by the IPG or the Construction Budget is revised to reflect the change order. SECTION 6.FUNDING OF THE HEALY-FAIRBANKS SEGMENT. (a)Eunding of Preliminary Costs.GVEA costs and expenses incurred or obligated by GVEA and approved by the IPG pursuant to Section 4(a)shall be funded from grant funds held by AIDEA for the account of GVEA under the Intertie Grant Agreement. (b)Financing Plan and Funding of Costs in Excess of Grant. Concurrent with the approval by the IPG of Design and Construction Costs,the IPG shall adopt a financing plan for the Healy-Fairbanks Segment consistent with Section 4(b)of the Participants Agreement. Such plan shall provide the method of financing construction costs and expenses in excess of $43,200,000.If such financing plan involves the issuance of bonds by AIDEA,the IPG and its members shall enter into appropriate arrangements with AIDEA for the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $60,000,000 to finance the completion of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment.In the event one or more members elect to finance their share of Segment costs individually,the IPG and such member(s)shall enter into appropriate arrangements to assure funding for such share;provided,that the cumulative cost financed through AIDEA bonds and individual member funding shall not exceed $60,000,000,without IPG approval. (c)Assurance of Adequate Funding.The IPG and GVEA shall use their best efforts to secure adequate financing of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and cooperate with AIDEA,if AIDEA is requested by the IPG to issue bonds to finance all or a part of the remaining cost of the Segment. SECTION 7.INVOICING AND PAYMENT. (a)Invoicing.GVEA shall prepare and submit an invoice to the IPG, or its designee,by the tenth of each month stating the amounts to be paid to its contractors for progress payments for work accomplished in 8 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:56 .@ 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 7011-020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm the prior month and to be paid to GVEA for direct labor and equipment furnished by GVEA and any other Design and Construction Cost relating to the Healy-Fairbanks Segment.GVEA shall include copies of the invoices submitted by such contractors and certify their accuracy on GVEA's invoice.The GVEA invoice shall also detail the hours of direct labor provided by GVEA personnel and equipment involved in support of the design and construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and any other Design and Construction Cost expended by GVEA.All invoices submitted shall conform to the requirements of the Grant Administrative Agreement dated November __,1993 between AIDEA and the Participants in the Participants Agreement ("Grant Administrative Agreement"). (b)Review of Invoice.The IPG or its designee shall review GVEA's invoice and approve the invoice in whole or in part or disapprove any part not consistent with the Design and Construction Costs or not conforming to the requirements of the Grant Administrative Agreement within 10 days after receipt.The approved invoice or the approved parts of the invoice shall then be forwarded to AIDEA for payment to GVEA.Once grant funds available from AIDEA are fully committed, IPG shall forward GVEA's invoice to AIDEA or the individual IPG member for payment of its proportionate share of such invoice. (c)Working Capital.In addition to costs actually incurred,GVEA may include in each invoice an amount to maintain working capital at the level provided in the Construction Budget. SECTION 8.TERMINATION AND DEFAULT. (a)Termination by.GVEA.GVEA may,for any reason,terminate this Agreement if written notice of such termination is tendered no less than 60 days prior to the anticipated date of commencement of construction.If such notice is not given,GVEA may terminate this Agreement upon reasonable notice,but not less than 90 days if GVEA can demonstrate that termination Is for just cause.In either event, GVEA shall use its reasonable best efforts to cooperate with the new construction manager selected by the IPG,and mitigate any costs 9 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:57 3503 228 0079 ATER WYNNE 012/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm arising fram the termination of this Agreement and the transfer of responsibility to the new construction manager. (b)Notification of Material Breach or Default.If either Party is in material breach of or default under this Agreement (Defaulting Party), the other Party (Terminating Party)may notify in writing the Defaulting Party that it is in material breach or default.Such notice shall be effective upon its receipt by the Defaulting Party.For the purpose of this section,material breach or default under this Agreement includes, but is not limited to: (1)insolvency,/.e.,a Party is unable to meet its obligations as they become due; (2)general assignment of substantially all of a Party's assets for the benefit of it creditors,filing of a petition for bankruptcy or reorganization or seeking other relief under any applicable insolvency laws;and (3)failure of a Party to meet its obligations under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing,this Agreement shall not be terminated as a result of an Uncontrollable Force, (c)RighttoCure. (1)The Defaulting Party shall have the right to cure the material breach or default within 30 calendar days of the receipt of notification of the material breach or default. (2)In the case of a material breach or default which may not reasonably be cured within 30 calendar days,the Defaulting Party shall have the right to provide the Terminating Party with a plan for the appropriate actions to cure the breach or default.Within this 30 calendar days, the Defaulting Party must commence diligently pursuing appropriate action under the plan to cure the default. 10 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:57 @503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 013-020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm SECTION 9.DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The Parties shall attempt to resolve any dispute arising from the terms of this Agreement.In the event of a dispute,the following procedures shall be followed: (a)|GVEA''s Manager and the designee of the IPG shall,by consultation,exercise reasonable efforts to arrive at an amicable settlement. (b)In the event that no settlement is reached by the Parties within 30 calendar days after notice by either Party,the Parties agree that the matter will be finally settled by arbitration consistent with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association by three arbitrators nominated in accordance with such rules,with each Party hereby agreeing that any such submission to arbitration shall be accompanied by a request that the arbitrators be knowledgeable in the field of construction. (c)Any such arbitration shall take place in Anchorage or Fairbanks, Alaska,at GVEA's option,or such other location agreed upon by the Parties.The decision of the arbitrators,rendered in writing,shall be final and conclusive and binding on the Parties. (d)GVEA's cost of such arbitration shall be a Design and Construction Cost,unless the arbitrators find that GVEA's actions are without merit. SECTION 10.LIABILITY. GVEA shall defend,indemnify and hold harmless the IPG,IPG Members,AIDEA and AEG&T,their agents,employees,and consultants from and against all liability,damages,claims,lawsuits, demands,causes of action and expenses (including,but not limited to, reasonable attorneys'fees)resulting from GVEA's,its directors, agents',officers',staff,and employees'grossly negligent acts or intentional or willful misconduct related to design and construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment.Except that GVEA shall not be liable 11 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 014/02002/21/34 17:57 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE _. DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm (except with other Participants under the Participants Agreement,and to the extent of its Participant's Share of any Design and Construction Costs)for: (a)Damages resulting from design or construction decisions presented to and approved by the IPG;and/or (b)The intentional or negligent acts of engineering design firms or contractors retained by GVEA,provided,that GVEA has made a good faith effort to supervise and inspect the activities of such engineering design firms or contractors;and/or (c)Damages or other costs and expenses resulting from GVEA's ordinary negligence in the performance of its duties as Construction Manager. All such damages,costs,and expenses other than those indemnified by GVEA under this Section shall be Construction Costs and Expenses. SECTION 11.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. (a)Audit.The IPG,or any IPG Member,AIDEA,or AEG&T shall have the right to audit the books and records of GVEA relating to GVEA's performance of this Agreement at any time upon reasonable notice to GVEA.The cost of such audit shall be borne by the requesting party,unless such audit discloses that GVEA has (1)failed to account for Design and Construction Costs in some significant manner or (2)acted in bad faith,in performing its obligations under this Agreement,in which case GVEA shall pay the reasonable costs of the audit.The right to audit shall extend for a period of three years following the completion of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment. (b)Separate Books and Records.GVEA shall maintain separate books and records for the design and construction of the Healy- Fairbanks Segment.Such books and records shall be available to theIPG,IPG Members,AIDEA and AEGAT for thelr Inspection.Coples of such books and records shall be made available to any such entity upon request;provided,that such entity reimburses GVEA for the 12 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:57 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 015/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm reasonable cost of reproducing or otherwise making available such books and records, (c)Waiver Not Continuing.Any waiver at any time by a Party of its rights with respect to any default of the other Party,or with respect to any other matter arising in connection with this Agreement,shall not be considered a waiver with respect to any prior or subsequent default, right or matter. (d)Applicable Law.The laws of the State of Alaska (including without limitation the equal opportunity laws set forth in AS 18.80.220,as the same may be amended from time to time)shall govern the interpretation and application of this Agreement and the actions of the Parties hereunder. (e)Assignment.Each Party agrees that it shall not sell,assign or transfer its interest,rights,or obligations under this Agreement to any other entity without the written permission of the other Party. (f)Section Headings.The Section headings in this Agreement are for convenience only,and do not purport to and shall not be deemed to define,limit or extend the scope or intent of the section to which they pertain. (g)Third Party Beneficiaries.AIDEA and AEG&T are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement.By entering into this Agreement,the Parties expressly do not intend to create any obligation or liability,or promise any performance to any other third party,nor have the Parties created for any other third party any right to enforce this Agreement. (h)Severability,If after this Agreement has become effective any article,paragraph,clause or provision of this Agreement shall be finally adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction or a regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the Parties to be invalid or unenforceable,or if any administrative agency with authority over the Parties shall require changes to this Agreement,then the Parties shall in good faith meet promptly to negotiate lawful amendments or modification to this Agreement that will effectuate the original intent of this Agreement 13 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 016-02002/21/94 17:58 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE . DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm and retun the Parties as nearly as possible to the position that each would have enjoyed in the absence of such judicial,regulatory,or administrative action. (i)Notices and Computation of Time.Any notice required by this Agreement to be given to a Party shall be effective when received by such Party,and in computing any period of time from such notice, such period shall commence at 12:01 p.m.prevailing time at the place of receipt on the date of receipt of such notice.Whenever this Agreement calls for notice to or notification by a Party the same (unless otherwise specifically provided)shall be in writing and directed to the General Manager of GVEA or the Chairman of the IPG as appropriate.If the date for making any payment or performing any act is a day on which banking institutions are closed in the place where payment is to be made or a legal holiday,payment may be made or the act performed on the next succeeding day which is neither a legal holiday nor a day when banking institutions are closed in such place. (j)Inspection of Facilities.For purposed of this Agreement,the IPG members or designees may,but shall not be obligated to,inspect GVEA's plans and specifications related to the Healy-Fairbanks Segment and to visit the construction sites related thereto at any time upon reasonable notice,but such inspection or failure to inspect shall not render the IPG,its members or its designees,liable or responsible for any injury,loss,damage,or accident resulting from defects in such plans and specifications or construction of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment. (k)Remedies Cumulative.No remedy conferred upon or reserved to the Parties hereto is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy or remedies available hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law,in equity,by statute or otherwise,but each and every such remedy shall! be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other such remedy. (1)Covenant o fe)ith j ing.Jn order to permit this Agreement,throughout its term,to be full effective In accordance withtheoriginalintentoftheParties,each Party agrees that it shall at all 14 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:58 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE (017/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm times act,in good faith and with fair dealing in performing its obligations and in exercising its rights under this Agreement. (m)Exhibits.The exhibits attached to this Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement if the provisions of this Agreement identifying such exhibits so specify,but otherwise shall be attached for convenience only. (n)Performance Pending Resolution of Dispute.Pending resolution of any dispute,each Party shall continue to perform its obligations under this Agreement,including but not limited to the obligation to make the payments required by this Agreement.A Party shall be entitled to seek immediate judicial enforcement of this continued performance obligation notwithstanding the existence of a dispute. Application for such enforcement shall be made to the Superior Court for the State of Alaska,at Fairbanks. (o)Other Agreements.Except as otherwise expressly provided herein,this Agreement does not modify,alter,or amend any other contract or agreement that may exist between or among any of the Parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. INTERTIE PARTICIPANTS GROUP By: 'Chairman ON BEHALF OF: THE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE d/b/a MUNICIPAL LIGHT AND POWER CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC. 15 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 2 02/21/84 17:58 503 226 00793 ATER WYNNE 018/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm °,THE MUNICIPALITY OF FAIRBANKS d/b/a FAIRBANKS MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SYSTEM GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC. HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC. MATANUSKA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC. THE CITY OF SEWARD d/b/a SEWARD ELECTRIC SYSTEM GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,INC. By: As: 16 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT g 202/21/94 17:58 503 228 0079 ATER WYNNE (7]019/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm .EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF HEALY-FAIRBANKS SEGMENT DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION 1.Transmission Line Route.Subject to the completion of appropriate environmental analysis the route of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment will be selected from one of the routes shown on the attached location map. 2.Transmission Design.The Healy-Fairbanks Segment will be designed and constructed to 230 kV standards on weathering steel X-frame structures.(The Segment will be operated at 138 kV initially).All river crossings will be overhead without any underground sections. 3.Substations. a.Healy Substation.GVEA's Healy Substation will be expanded to include a new 138 kV breaker bay and associated support structures and equipment. b.Teeland Substation.The Chugach Electric Association,Inc. Teeland Substation will be expanded to include a new 138 kV breaker bay and an additional ==»MVA,,230/138 kV transformer bank,20 MVAr offixedcapacitorsandrelatedsupportstructuresandequipment. Cc.Wilson Substation.A new substation (Wilson Substation)is proposed for the northern terminal of the Healy-Fairbanks Segment.The substation will be in the vicinity of 30th and Lathrop in Fairbanks,adjacent to the existing GVEA 138 kV and 69 kV lines and the existing 69 kV tie to Fairbanks Municipal Utility System.The substation will consist of five 138 kV breaker bays,four 69 kV breaker bays,a 60/80/100 MVA 138/69 kV transformer bank and 50 MVAr capacitance and 10 MVAr inductive reactance and related support structures and equipment.(See attached one line diagram). d.Igloo Substation.A new substation (Igloo Substation)is proposed for the location of reactive compensation for the Healy-Fairbanks 17 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 02/21/94 17:59 503 226 0079 ATER WYNNE 41020/020 DRAFT 02/21/94 1:54pm Segment and the existing Alaska Intertie.The Igloo Substation will be located 35 miles south of Cantwell,near Igloo,on the Parks HighwayadjacenttotheexistingAlaskaIntertieLine.It will include two 138 kv (230 kV capable)breaker bays,40 MVAr capacitance and 10 MVAr of inductive reactance and related support structures and equipment.(See attached one line diagram) 4.Permitting/NEPA.GVEA will proceed to obtain all necessary permits from the State and Federal agencies with jurisdiction.GVEA will work with the Rural Electrification Administration,as the proposed lead agency,and other Federal agencies to assure compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. 18 -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT LAH\384igh.age