Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIntertie Managment Commitee Meetings 06-11-2013 3Alaska Intertie F¥14 Budget Approved Proposed FY12 FY13 ACTUALS FYt4 Actual Budget _2 33413 Budget REVENUESGVEA 1,936,358 2,097,520 1,206,827.00 1,888,380 ML&P 64,461 $8,134 §6,134.00 50,096CEA76,240 78,967 76,266.00 69,620 AEG&T .67,366 _. MEA 682 44,679 46,845.60 41,331 MISC Revenue-Reliability Standards $5,317 INTEREST 268 48.89 TOTAL REVENUES 2,190,688 2,277,300 4,385,141.49 2,049,427 EXPENSES FERC 562 -Station Operation Expenses GVEA -Substation Electricity Usage 7,558 6,000 6,465.72 7,000 7,658 6,000 6,465.72 7,000 FERC 666 -Miscell:Transmission Expense SCADA &Voice Circuits (SOA)234,200 7,000 °° Private Line Telephone Service for AK!SCADA (GVEA)28,667 55,000 18,604.19 108,000 ANC-FAI IOC Communication Link (CEA)9,861 °-- Cell Phone Comm.Svc for Weather Monitoring (ATT)11,556 20,000 9,163.26 15,000 SLMS -Support Contract/Battery Changeout (08-007-EPSi)71,704 60,000 18,868.74 60,000 _Intertie Ground Safety Patrol -(08-007-HDR)37,710 40,000 4,138.77 40,000 Mise Studies as needed (Cyber Security Study)-80,000 426.00 50,000 Misc Studies as needed (System Stability Study)180,000393,607 300,000 61,290.96 451,000 FERC 667 -Transmission Expenses -Rents Rents -Alaska Raliroad 400 400 .400 MEA-Talkeetna Storage 7,200 7,200 4,800.00 7,200 PSSE key replacement ":-1,000 7,600 7,600 4,800.00 8,600 FERC 670 -Maintenance of Station Equipment GVEA -Healy Cantwell,Goldhill 57,696 $2,000 86,401.63 65,000 GVEA -SCADA Maintenance Healy,Cantwell,Gold Hil ©... GVEA -Healy SVC Maintenance (570270)22,839 °. GVEA -Gold Hill SVC Maintenance (570240)6,328 -- GVEA -Cantwell Batteries -New Charger 4,940 -. GVEA -Cantwei Substation Fence tt;259,102 -. GVEA -Standby Generator Set Standardization at CWS -35,000 -. .GVEA -Replace Protective Relay Schemes Healy :55,700 .25,000 .. MEA.Replace Protective Relay Schemes Douglas 42,886 308,000 °330,000 GVEA -CantwellRepair4S2Swich 60,000 . GVEA -Mobile Substation Access 250,000 .250,000 ”GVEA-RPU replecamont-Cantwell *45,000 -45,000 GVEA-R Control Rep mt 80,000 -80,000 GVEA -Transformer Protection Upgrades 8.va 35,000 .*35,000 CEA-Teeland Substation $2,000 51,643.31 - MEA -Douglas Substation 10,202 5,000 76.45 17,200 461,493 987,000 136,321.38 822,200 FERC 571 -Maintenance of Overhead Lines GVEA -Northem Maintenance 95,538 152,000 69,424.00 153,000 GVEA -Narthem ROW Clearing -200,000 -: GVEA -Landing Pads .50,000 °50,000 GVEA -Re-leval Structures &Adjust Guys 125,564 26,000 -26,000 GVEA -Repair Tower 692 °20,000 °20,000 MEA -Special Patrols {Incl Foundation Inspections].20,000 53,226 84 15,000 MEA -Souther Maint (Incl Ground inspect)88,476 70,000 30,750.89 70,000 MEA-Southom ROW Clearing Talkeetna North 2.639 20,000 .25,000 MEA-Contingency °40,000 °20,000 MEA -TWR 195 Repalr Monitoring :::10,000 312,217 898,000 163,400.83 389,000 FERC 920 -AEA Administrative Costs Personal Services,Travel and Other Costs 65,000 50,000 24,076.05 §0,000 66,099 60,000 24,076.05 60,000 FERC 920 -IMC Administrative Costs IMC Administrative Costs (Audit,meetings,legal)600,392 16,592.65 34,000 500,392 16,692.65 34,000 FERC 924 -Property Insurance AK Intertie -Insurance 28,046 120,000 140,007.31 145,000 Insurance Risk Assessment -§0,000 .- 28,046 170,000 140,007.31 148,000 TOTAL EXPENSE 1,766,012 2,118,600 634,953.91 1,906,800 SURPLUS (SHORTAGE)424,877 168,700 850,187.68 142,627 ALASKA INTERTIE FISCAL YEAR 2014 ENERGY PROJECTION GVEA MEA CEA |ML&P TOTAL :CAPACITY CASH FLOW MONTH MWH MWH MWH |MWH MWH GVEA |CEA {MEA GVEA [|MEA jML&P {CEA TOTALS Jul 33,000 0 0 0 33,000 $104,610 $0 $0 $157,560 $40,380 $50,096 $67,084 $419,730 Aug 34,000 0 0 0 34,000 $107,780 $0 $0 $107,780 Sep 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 $126,800 $0 $0 $126,800 Oct 48,000 0 [¢)0 48,000 $152,160 $0 $0 $152,160 Nov 51,000 100 200 0 §1,300 $161,670 $634 $317 $162,621 Dec 54,000 100]200 0 54,300 $171,180 $634 $317 $172,131 Jan 55,000 100]200 0 55,300 $174,350 $634 $317 $175,301 Feb 48,000 Oo}200 0 48,200 $152,160 $634 $0 $152,794 Mar 52,000 0 0 0 52,000 $164,840 $0 $0 $164,840 Apr 43,000 0 0 0 43,000 $136,310 $0 $0 $136,310 May 48,000 0 0 0 48,000 $152,160 $0 $0 $152,160 Jun 40,000 0 ie)0 40,000 $126,800 $0 $0 $126,800 TOTAL 546,000 300 800 0 547,100 $1,730,820 $2,536 $951 $157,560 $40,380 $50,096 $67,084 $2,049,427 T.Energy:$1,734,307 JT.Cap:$315,120 $2,049,427 TOTAL INTERTIE PROJECTED ENERGY USAGE 547,100 MWH TOTAL MWH REVENUE $2,049,427 Usage estimate reduced by 1/12 of Total for rate calculations 501,508 MWH O&M BUDGET $1,908,800 Section 7.2.2 MINIMUM USEAGE CONTRACT VALUE 204,984 MWH DIFFERENCE $142,627 UTILITY MEA ML&P CEA GVEA Usage Rate per KWH Capacity Rate $0.00317 $2.02 25.63% 31.79% 42.58% FY 14anes 19.99 MW 24.80 MW 33.21 MW 100.00%78.00 MW 156.0 Annual System Demand MINIMUM INTERTIE TRANSFER CAPABILITY RIGHTS TOTAL 1011 1112 4213 3 YR AVG. SOUTHERN UTILITY PARTICIPANTS (MW) ML&P 177.0 180.0 172.0 176.3 MW CEA 242.2 237.8 228.25 236.1 MW MEA 137.2 141.3 147.8 142.1 MW 554.5 MW NORTHERN UTILITY PARTICIPANTS (MW) GVEA 2115 212.4 217.6 213.8 MW 213.8 MWTOTAL 33.50 MW of GVEA peak are non-firm MITCR DETERMINATION FY 14 ----MEA 25.63%19.99 MWMLaP31.79%24.80 MWCEA42.58%33.21 MWGVEA100.00%78.00 MW 156.00 MW (A)See Section 7.2.5 AK Intertie Agreement {B)See Section 7.2.6 AK Intertie Agreement AMENDED (MITCR)DETERMINATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 DRAFT APPROVED §APPROVED =APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED4/10/2013 4/24/2012 4/13/2012 4/15/2010 4/18/2009 4/17/2008 UNITS FY14 FYI3 FY12 FY11 FY10 FYO9 USAGE”KWH 507,508,000 384,175,000 452,008,000 190,942,000 300,025,000 481,525,000 BUDGET $1,906,800 2,118,600 2,368,109 3,069,386 2,760,344 2,526,817MITCR=KW 156,000 156,000 140,000 .140,000 140,000 140,000 ENERGY (A)$.000/KWH $0.00317 $0.00460 $0.00437 $0,01342 $0.00768 $0.00438 CAPACITY (B)=$/KW $2.02 $2.24 $2.79 $3.62 $3.25 $2.98 KWH CAPRATE CAP CHARGE 19,990 -$2.02 40,379.8024,600 $2.02 50,096.0033,210 $2.02 67,084.2078,000 $2.02 157,580.00156,000 __315,120 00 INTERTIE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Resolution No.13-1 Background:On November 18,2011,the Intertie Management Committee ("IMC”)approved Resolution 11-1 which resolved that all then-currently existing contracts,customs,and operating policies and procedures associated with the Alaska Intertie and recognized by the Alaska Energy Authority ("AEA”)and the Intertie Operating Committee ("IOC”)were to remain in effect and be maintained by the IMC until such time as the IMC expressly addresses such contracts and operating policies and procedures relating to the operation of the Alaska Intertie (Intertie). On September 13,2012,the IMC formally addressed and establish the reserve capacity and operating reserve responsibilities for all users of the Intertie. Purpose:The purpose of this Resolution No.13-1 is to adopt system reliability and reserve criteria document dated April 4,2012,prepared by the Railbelt Reliability Committee (RRC)for all users of the Intertie. THEREFORE,IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: WHEREAS,the RRC has crafted reliability and reserve criteria for the Railbelt;and, WHEREAS,five of seven utilities or owners of Railbelt transmission systems have accepted the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement dated November 18,2011,as the management protocol for the interconnected system;and, WHEREAS,Exhibit H of the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement defines Reserve Capacity and Operating Reserve responsibilities;and, WHEREAS the current Exhibit H is a 1985 document that does not reflect current system configuration or operating protocols;and, WHEREAS the only entity establishing reliability criteria for the interconnected system is the Alaska System Coordinating Council (ASCC)that has been defunct for 15 years;and, WHEREAS the RRC-prepared document establishes reliability standards,reserve capacity and rules for operating reserves;and, WHEREAS the IMCis the entity in the interconnected system that governs,controls,operates, maintains,repairs and improves the system;and, WHEREAS the IMCis fit,willing and able to undertake and effectively accomplish the tasks identified in the aforementioned clause. Page 1 of 2 --IMC Resolution 13-1 INTERTIE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Resolution No.13-1 (Continued) BE IT RESOLVED THAT the system reliability and reserve criteria document dated April 4, 2012,prepared by the RRC is hereby accepted as Exhibit H of the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement;and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this resolution and the aforementioned system reliability and reserve criteria document prepared by the RRC be submitted as an informational filing to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). The Secretary hereby certifies that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.13-1 and Resolution No.13-1 was approved by the IMC on June 11,2013. Bradley Evans,Chairman Gene Therriault,Secretary Page 2 of 2 -IMC Resolution 13-1 INTERTIE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Resolution No.13-1 Background:On November 18,2011,the Intertie Management Committee ("IMC”)approved Resolution 11-1 which resolved that all then-currently existing contracts,customs,and operating policies and procedures associated with the Alaska Intertie and recognized by the Alaska Energy Authority ("AEA”)and the Intertie Operating Committee ("IOC”)were to remain in effect and be maintained by the IMC until such time as the IMC expressly addresses such contracts and operating policies and procedures relating to the operation of the Alaska Intertie (Intertie). On September 13,2012,the IMC formally addressed and establish the reserve capacity and operating reserve responsibilities for all users of the Intertie. Purpose:The purpose of this Resolution No.13-1 is to adopt system reliability and reserve criteria document dated April 4,2012,prepared by the Railbelt Reliability Committee (RRC)for all users of the Intertie. THEREFORE,IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: WHEREAS,the RRC has crafted reliability and reserve criteria for the Railbelt;and, WHEREAS,five of seven utilities or owners of Railbelt transmission systems have accepted the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement dated November 18,2011,as the management protocol for the interconnected system;and, WHEREAS,Exhibit H of the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement defines Reserve Capacity and Operating Reserve responsibilities;and, WHEREAS the current Exhibit H is a 1985 document that does not reflect current system configuration or operating protocols;and, WHEREAS the only entity establishing reliability criteria for the interconnected system is the Alaska System Coordinating Council (ASCC)that has been defunct for 15 years;and, WHEREAS the-RRC-prepared document establishes reliability standards,reserve capacity and rules for operating reserves;and, WHEREAS the IMC is the entity in the interconnected system that governs,controls,operates, maintains,repairs and improves the system;and, WHEREAS the IMCis fit,willing and able to undertake and effectively accomplish the tasks identified in the aforementioned clause. Page 1 of 2-IMC Resolution 13-1 INTERTIE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Resolution No.13-1 (Continued) BE IT RESOLVED THAT the system reliability and reserve criteria document dated April 4, 2012,prepared by the RRC is hereby accepted as Exhibit H of the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement;and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this resolution and the aforementioned system reliability and reserve criteria document prepared by the RRC be submitted as an informational filing to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). The Secretary hereby certifies that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.13-1 and Resolution No.13-1 was approved by the IMC on June 11,2013. Bradley Evans,Chairman Gene Therriault,Secretary Page 2 of 2 -IMC Resolution 13-1 A Resolution of the Intertie Management Committee (IMC) On Railbelt Reliability and Reserves Criteria WHEREAS the Railbelt Reliability Committee (RRC)has crafted reliability and reserve criteria for the Railbelt and, WHEREAS five of seven utilities or owners of Railbelt transmission systems have accepted the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement dated November 18,2011,as the management protocol for the interconnected system and, WHEREAS Exhibit H of the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement defines Reserve Capacity and Operating Reserve responsibilities and, WHEREAS the current Exhibit H is a 1985 document that does not reflect current system configuration or operating protocols and, WHEREAS the only entity establishing reliability criteria for the interconnected system is the Alaska System Coordinating Council (ASCC)that has been defunct for 15 years and, WHEREAS the RRC-prepared document establishes reliability standards,reserve capacity and rules for operating reserves and, WHEREAS the IMC is the entity in the interconnected system that governs,controls,operates, maintains,repairs and improves the system and, WHEREAS the IMCis fit,willing and able to undertake and effectively accomplish the tasks identified in the aforementioned clause. Now therefore this Intertie Management Committee resolves: 1.The system reliability and reserve criteria document dated April 4"",2012,prepared by the RRC is hereby accepted as Exhibit H of the Amended and Restated Alaska Intertie Agreement. 2.This resolution and the system reliability and reserve criteria document be submitted as an informational filing to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). Reliability Standards Documents -DRAFT April 4,2012 Introduction Control Area Standards AKBAL-003-0.doc AKBAL-004-0.doc AKBAL-005-0.doc AKBAL-006-0.doc Facility Standards AKFAC-002-0.doc Interchange Scheduling Standards AKINT-001-0.doc Transmission Planning Limits AKTPL-001-0.doc Interconnection Standards Generation Interconnection.doc Transmission Interconnection.doc Interconnection.doc Reserves Policy Reserves Policy.doc Other Documents Time Error Correction Procedure.doc :se ASCC Operating Guides.pdf as ASCC Planning Criteria.pdf Entity Matrix.doc Glossary_of_Terms_2 Go AWOO Prgoopy He k ability StardardsrotLEAKpywhat(s in the AoeeMenk. The managers of the Railbelt utilities have formed and requested a reliability group to develop standards to better emulate national utility practices and to provide direction to the Railbelt utilities on how to cooperatively operate their systems for the betterment of the interconnected electrical system.The group,the Railbelt Reliability Committee (RRC)has drafted these standards giving careful consideration to the many technical and operational issues involved with interconnecting entities to the Alaska Railbelt Electrical System (also referred to as the "Railbelt Interconnection”or "The System”)and with five overarching goals: e First,these standards set the minimum requirements for interconnection to The System;The local entity at the point of interconnection may have additional or more stringent interconnection standards. e Second,to the extent practical,these interconnection standards should be performance based rather than requirements based. e Third,to the extent practical,interconnecting entities should not be allowed to degrade the performance or reliability of The System.Such degradation in performance shall be determined by modeling the Railbelt Electrical System using the boundary dispatch cases against all category B and probable category C contingencies. e Fourth,interconnecting entities should not be required to build or improve System facilities beyond those necessary to meet the third overarching goal (above). e Fifth,the interconnecting entity,as a condition of interconnection,shall abide by this and all other applicable Railbelt standards as they may be modified or implemented from time to time.A Balancing Authority having jurisdiction shall ascertain that the new entity agrees to these Standards prior to interconnection or that another entity will absorb the new entity's obligations as additional obligations to their own.The new entity may have additional obligations imposed by the local Transmission Owner. Given the complex and technical nature of the subject,the authors have worked diligently to maintain a high level of clarity throughout this document,in order to meet the needs of the participants,but they recognize that these standards are often based upon highly technical subject matter.To aid in understanding and implementing these requirements and criteria,the Railbelt Reliability Committee will require potential entities to obtain the assistance of qualified engineering professionals with specific expertise in the areas of electrical supply systems,power system analysis,protection,as well as control.Such professionals must have demonstrated experience in modeling,designing,constructing, commissioning and operating facilities on small,stability-limited interconnections. These guidelines are subject to revision,at any time,at the discretion of the Railbelt Reliability Committee This document is not intended to be a design specification. The essential documents are organized as follows: The first set of standards defines how entities must provide for a reliable electric system. These standards are similar to what NERC requires outside of Alaska. The AKBAL's are the standards dealing with how balancing authorities (most of the Alaskan utilities are vertically integrated and are each their own balancing authority) work with each other.It is these standards that establish a requirement for reserve policies. The AKFAC's are the standards dealing with new construction,maintenance and ratings. These standards contain the requirements for Interconnection Standards.It should be noted that these Interconnection Standards are minimums Railbelt wide and that more stringent interconnection requirements may be imposed at the local level by the local entity. The AKINT's are the standards dealing with interchange scheduling. The AKTPL's are the standards dealing with contingency categorization and reporting under normal and emergency conditions. The second set of standards is the Interconnect Standards for Generation,Transmission, and End Users.These standards are applied to entities/equipment,where a single contingency (Class B)could result in the net change of 10 or more MW's of generating capacity or load.This limit is based on our current system bias where loss of a 10 MW unit will cause the system frequency to drop 0.1 Hz.In most of our control centers,this is the level where the first level of frequency alarms are initiated indicating a major system disturbance.In the future,the Railbelt Reliability Committee may want to review this limit as the Railbelt System changes over time. The last set of standards is the Reserves Policy.These standards set requirements for the resource adequacy,operating reserves,spinning reserves,and regulating reserves.These standards have some amount of behavior modification built into them in that they have formulas that will incentivize an entity's compliance with the standards in the event of nonperformance.It should be noted that these formulas are for minor infractions,and that for willful infractions further sanctions may be warranted.Balancing Authorities with small units (less that 10 MW)but with non-dispatchable fuel sources may find that they have little to no spin obligation,but will likely have a large regulating obligation. While it is recognized that prolonged interruption of the fuel supply to a generating plant is unlikely it is required that each generating entity have contingency plans for loss of the primary fuel supply.This may include but not be limited to use of alternate fuels, generation at alternate locations or emergency power purchase agreements with other generators. These Railbelt Standards supersede the previous reliability criteria found in the ASCC documents "ASCC Operating Guides for Interconnected Utilities and Alaska Intertie Operating Guides”and the "ASCC Planning Criteria for the reliability of interconnected electric utilities”.Where this document is silent,the ASCC documents should continue to be referenced. Sanctions for Levels of Non-Compliance when not otherwise described in the Standards refer to the Sanctions Matrix for Non-Compliance.The Railbelt Reliability Committee is authorized to change the sanctions as the needs may arise,but only for future infractions. Each Entity desiring to interconnect to the Railbelt System must fill out an Entity Function Matrix checking off the functions which they believe they perform.This document will be kept by the Railbelt Reliability Committee and will be used to determine an entity's obligations as well as what areas it may participate in.Vertically integrated utilities may find themselves participating in most,if not all categories. The following projects have already,or are expected to,be in procurement,and beyond initial design stages prior to these standards being adopted.Therefore,these projects will be considered grandfathered from the Interconnect Standards,but will still held to the principles under the predecessor ASCC Documents. 1)GVEA's Eva Creek Wind Farm (state size,manufacturer,type of equipment,location,voltages etc.) 2)AIDEA's HCCP (state size,manufacturer,type of equipment,location, voltages etc.) 3)CEA/AMLP's SPP 4)HEA's NCC Nikiski's Waste Heat Unit 5)HEA's Soldotna 2xLM6000's 6)CIRI's Wind Farm 7)MEA's Eklutna Generation Station 8)AMLP LM6000 and LM2500 at Plant 2 and Plant 1