Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Unalaska Geothermal Project Proposal APA -86-R-015 1986
TY [://ile]s PROPOSAL No.B08653-04 LALA ELE COPY NO. et ISSUED TO:pred VOLUME 1 OF 4 r >ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL PROJECT PROPOSAL APA-86-R-015 JULY 1986 Ne y, SUBCONTRACTORS: e HART CROWSER,INC. e URS ENGINEERS FOR INFORMATION REGAADING THIS DOCUMENT CONTACT: -BILL LEWIS,P.E. ¢AL MUNIO \e AIRPORT WAY e P.O,BOX 1666 e HAILEY,IDAHO 83333 ©(208)788-3456 e FEASIBILITY STUDIES SIMILAR TO UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL PROPOSAL »'Imperial Energy ISMH Geothermal Project,California lunl Flaa hk ¢Salton Sea 49M Geothermal Project,California Arend Flaaly ,bight saline, «Soda Lake Cost Estfmate and Economic Evaluation,Caltfornta open copt set ine ¢Geothermal Pilot Plant Scaling Test,Nevada ¢Ormesa Geothermal Project,Californta Frqa to Semele *Vulcan 20MM Geothermal Plant e Saltqmr Sea Steam Gathering System,California »Cosa Hot Springs 25MH Geothermal Plant and TI5kV Transmission S036H i)tou.TABLE 1 ESTIMATE BASIS -QUANTITIES AND PRICING Vendor Engineering Estimating Quote Take-Off Group Wellhead Separators Flash Separators Clarifiers(}) Thickeners(}) Filter system') Filter Press Steam Scrubbers Flash Reactors Turbine Generator Condenser Cooling Tower!) Pumps Valves Piping Misc.(Air Removal, Util.)xX,x Installation:(Incl. hangers,small bore piping,etc.)4 Buildings (HVAC,fire protection,etc.)6))eKORKKOKOKKOKbadx T&c X Xx Civil/Structural Xx x Tanks())xX Based on:Process Flow Diagram Plot Plan Electrical One-Lines Load List Equipment List with Performance Data (1)Subcontract for supply and erect. 04958.113084 .17 TABLE 1 ESTIMATE BASIS -QUANTITIES AND PRICING Vendor Engineering Estimating Quote Take-Off Group Wellhead Separators Flash Separators Clarifiers()) Thickeners(2) Filter system')) Filter Press Steam Scrubbers Flash Reactors Turbine Generator Condenser Cooling Tower?) Pumps Valves Piping Misc.(Air Removal, Util.)x x Installation-(Incl. hangers,smal] bore piping,etc.)x Buildings (HVAC,fire protection,etc.)6)x T&c X Xx Civil/Structural x x Tanks¢2)xeK ORKKKOKOOKxBased on:Process Flow Diagram Plot Plan Electrical One-Lines Load List Equipment List with Performance Data (1)-Subcontract for supply and erect. 0495B.113084 17 Lo.Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: 'Cost: Cost Source: Name:- Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 Power Plant Equipment List Wellhead Separators Twelve (12) Vertical,bottom steam out,cyclone separator 400 psig,500°F 2 1/4 Cr,1 Mo 36"ID,15'4"S-S 11,000 # $543,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation for carbon steel vessel factored to chrome-moly vessel HP Flash Separator Two (2) Vertical,natural circulation,draft tube separator 180 psig,400°F 2 1/4 each Cr,1 Mo 16'ID,39'S-S 153,000 # $820,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation LP Flash Separator Two (2) Vertical,natural circulation,draft tube separator 50 psig,300°F Carbon Steel 16'ID,35'S-S 125,000 #each $380,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation Flash Reactor Two (2) Vertical,natural circulation,draft tube reactor/separator 15 psig,300°F Carbon Steel 16'ID,32'S-S 33,000 # $160,000 (FOB jobsite) Estimate based on quotation for similar vessel -- 8 Lo.L__Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Hp: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Hp: Cost:-_ Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Hp: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 Clarifier Two (2) Domed roof,solids contact reactor/clarifier with turbine,rake and rake lift Atmospheric pressure,250°F,15 wt %solids in underflow,100 ppm solids in overflow Carbon Steel 80'ID,26'SWD 465,000 #-Empty 10,000,000 #-Operating Rake Drive -7.5 Rake Lift -1.5 Turbine Drive -25 $1,750,000 for both clarifiers (includes erection);erection cost $750,000 for both clarifiers Vendor budget quotation Thickener One Covered solids thickener with rake and rake lift Atmospheric pressure 250°F,30 wt %solids in underflow,100 ppm solids in overflow Carbon Steel 40'ID,10'SwOd 160,000 #-Empty 2,760,000 #-Operating Rake Drive -5 hp Rake Lift -1 hp $270,000 erected,erection cost $95,000 Vendor budget quotation Filter Press One Twenty-six chamber plate and frame press with control package 250°F,filter cake -65 wt %solids;1000 pph dry solids in cake Carbon steel with polypropylene filter media 6'wide,6'high,20'long (twenty-six chambers,1.46 ft?per chamber) 30,000 #-Empty 36,000 #-Operating Hydraulic pump -10 hp $151,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation ee Lo.-e1.Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Construction: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 Media Filters Eight (8) Horizontal multi-media gravity filters with valves,splitter box and control package Atmospheric pressure 250°F,100 ppm nominal 50 micron particles in feed,10 ppm solids in effluent Carbon steel with sand and anthracite media 12'wide,10'high,34'long 30,000 #/filter -Empty 300,000 #/filter -Media 500,000 #/filter -Operating $1,050,000;includes $50,000 installation/erection costs Vendor budget quotation BW Tank One Domed roof tank Atmospheric pressure,250°F Carbon Steel 36'ID,24'SwDd 73,000 #-Empty 1,800,000 #-Operating $71,200 erected,erection cost $25,000 Vendor budget quotation Holding Tank One Domed roof rank Atmospheric pressure,250°F Carbon steel 51'ID,24'SwD 122,000 #-Empty 3,725,000 #-Operating $128,519 erected,erection cost $49,000 Vendor budget quotation HP Steam Scrubber One Vertical cyclone separator 400 psig,5S00°F Carbon Steel 42"ID,20'S-S 11,000 # $38,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation 1Name: ;Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost.Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 MP Steam Scrubber One Vertical cyclone separator 180 psig,400°F 44"ID,21'S-S 12,000 # $40,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation LP Steam Scrubber One Vertical cyclone separator 50 psig,350°F Carbon Steel 72"ID,32'S-S 32,000 # $78,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation Turbine-Generator One Single cylinder,two flow,dual pressure, condensing geothermal steam turbine with air-cooled 3-phase,2 pole,synchronous generator with brushless exciter Turbine -HP steam -592,000 pph,120 psig, 360°F;LP steam -292,000 pph,20 psig, 20°F;Exhaust -4"HgA,986 BTU/1b Generator -52,000 KW,.85 lagging power factor,13.8 KV Foundation -33'high,72'long,34'6"wide 735,000 1b $5,440,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation Condenser One Two pass,dual entry surface condenser 4"HgA,90°F water supply,115°F water return,800 million BTU/hr,100°F N.C.gas outlet temperature 304L SS with 316L tubesheet 62'long,21'wide,27'high 500,000 #-Empty 900,000 #-Operating $1,750,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation ln.LName: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 NC gas removal system One 2 stage steam jet ejector system with 2-50% capacity jets per stage;includes inner-condenser and after condenser 4"HgA condenser pressure,100°F NC gases from condenser,20 psia 2nd stage discharge pressure,275 psig,440°F supply steam, 34,000 pph steam consumption, 304 L SS 16"suction and discharge for lst stage jets,10"suction and discharge for 2nd stage jets,20'tube length for each condenser 40,000 # $183,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation Cooling Tower 4 cells Counterflow tower with film fill 78°F wet bulb,12°F approach,25°F range, 22'pump head,one fan per cell,250 hp per fan,833 million BTU/hr. Douglas fir with stainless steel hardware 48'by 48'per cell $1,088,000 erected Vendor budget quotation Silencer One Vent Silencer 105 dBA at 60'with 604 pph flow at 120 psig and 440°F upstream conditions and 292,000 pph at 20 psig and 281°F upstream conditions 304L SS 84"ID,16°overall length 12,000 lb. $51,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation 10 Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Size: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Connected Hp: Weight: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Connected Hp: Material: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Material: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 Diesel Engine Generator|One Diesel engine generator set with 600A transfer switch,enclosure,600A circuit breaker,jacket water heater,battery charger,day tank,controls and storage tank 250 KW,.80 power factor,480 V,3 phase,7 hour day tank,192 gal,2 day storage tank 4'wide,11'long 7000 #-Empty 9000 #-Operating $44,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation Air Compressors Two Reciprocating,oil-free compressors with dryers,air receiver and control package 100 psig discharge pressure 125 scfm 30/compressor 5000 Ib/unit $65,000 (FOB jobsite) Similar job Fire Water Pump One : Motor driven,horizontal split-case,fire water pump with controls 2000 gpm at 230'TDH 150 Cast iron $62,000 for complete fire system,(two fire pumps,jockey pump,and controls;FOB jobsite) Similar job Fire Water Pump ; One Diesel driven,horizontal split-case fire water pumps with controls 2000 gpm at 230'TDH,180 hp diesel engine driver Cast iron See above ; Similar job 11 L__Name:Jockey PumpQuantity:One Type:Horizontal centrifugal pump Design Conditions:100 gpm at 300'TDH Connected Hp:15 Material:316 SS Cost:See above Cost Source:Similar job Name:Injection Pump Quantity:"One Type:Turbine driven,horizontal split-case centrifugal pump Design Conditions:6200 gpm at 320 psi TDH,non-condensing turbine with 275 psig,440°F supply steam and 125 psig,350°F exhaust Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$200,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job Name:Injection Pump Quantity:One 'Type:Motor driven,horizontal split-case centrifugal pump Design Conditions:6200 gpm at 320 psi TDH Connected Hp:1500 Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$125,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job Name:Condensate Pump Quantity:Two Type:Vertical turbine Design Conditions:1780 gpm at 95'TOH Connected Hp:60 each Material:316 SS Cost:$40,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job Name:Circulating Water Pump Quantity:Three Type:Vertical turbine Design Conditions:Three 50%capacity pumps rated at 33,200 gpm at 60'TOH Connected Hp:700 each Matertfal:316 SS Cost:$660,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job 04958 .113084 12 Name:Injection Booster Pumps Quantity:Two Type:Vertical turbine pumps Design Conditions:6600 gpm at 40'TDH Connected Hp:100 each Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$80,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Vendor budget quote Name:Seed Recycle Pumps Quantity:"Four Type:Two HP and two LP horizontal centrifugal slurry pumps Design Conditions:200 gpm at 90 psi TDH Connected Hp:30 each Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$48,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job Name:Thickener Overflow Pumps Quantity:Two Type::Horizontal centrifugal pumps Design Conditions:240 gpm at 60'TDH Connected Hp:7.5 each Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$12,000 (FOB jobsite)- Cost Source:Similar.job Name:-_Hotding Tank Pumps Quantity:Two Type:Horizontal centrifugal pumps Design Conditions:190 gpm at 30 psi TDH Connected Hp:10 each Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$80,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job Name:Brine Pond Pumps Quantity:Two Type:Vertical turbine Design Conditions:500 gpm at 70'TDH Connected Hp:15 each Material:Ni-hard alloy Cost:$20,000 (FOB jobsite) Cost Source:Similar job 0495B.113084 13 Lo.Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Connected Hp: Material: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Design Conditions: Connected Hp: Cost: Cost Source: Name: Quantity: Type: Design Conditions: Connected Hp: Cost: Cost Source: 0495B.113084 BW Pumps Two Horizontal centrifugal pumps 6100 gpm at 50'TDH 125 Ni-hard alloy $46,000 (FOB jobsite) Vendor budget quotation Gantry Crane One 30 ton,75'travel,35'span Hoist -15 hp Travel -2 hp Trolley -2 hp $127,000 (FOB jobsite) Similar job Chemical Treatment Package One Chlorinator with injector,pump and controls 4000 ppd chlorinator 10 $25,000 (FOB jobsite) Similar job 14 N.C.GASES TO ATMOSPHERE 4 COOLING WATER SUPPLY TO OEC'S «™ EvaPp AND ORIFT COOLING TOWER © COOLING WATER BOOSTER Pume FUTURE TOPPING -_. T-6 SET ry § -i]4 N r [a bey\y L-4 éb ! S"Eaw FROM wrIlls 1.296 PP TOTR, SE.55C PPm STEAM 14.555 PPH NCS COOLING WATER ${FROM OEC'S FUTURE HS | ABATEMENT SYSTEM 29,500 PPH/59 GPM {11,700 PPH/23 GPM)+ CONDENSATE BAS'N 206,500 PPM/413 GPM (135,400 PPH/270 GPM)+ 160°F --S ®VALUES IN PARENTHESIS REPRESENT FLOWS WITH TOPPING TURBINE INSTALLED --- l fa ! '4 ge TO INJECTION 29 GPM (16 Gem)* q ' + i t iZA:-|ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Ir20-86 SH!guy tir =ZONE RE V!S}OmS |OaTE BY aPPD REFERENCE DRAWINGS CONDENSATE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS SULPHURDALE PLANT MOTHER EARTH INDUSTRIES a |pan SH 20 66 Los wo 607CLUEae«areo MAw 1-04 26-01-0/-101/A\HAMLEY WAWO Tecale NTS 7 |e Engineers tncorporared July 25,1986 Alaska Power Authority P.O.Box 190869 70]East Tudor Road Anchorage,AK 99519-0869 Attention:Mr.David Denig-Chakroff Subject:Submittal of POWER Engineers',Inc.Proposal for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study,(APA-86-R-015) Dear David: Enclosed are six copies of POWER Engineers,Inc.(POWER's)proposal to perform the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.We are enthusiastic about this project and hope to have the opportunity to work with the Power Authority once again. Two years ago,POWER performed the environmental analysis and design of the Terror Lake -Port Lions 14.4/24.9kV Distribution Line on Kodiak Island for the Power Authority.This 14-mile line now brings economical and reliable power to the town of Port Lions,replacing an expensive and problematic diesel generation system.Extremely high winds;heavy icing conditions; contamination from salt,sea spray and fog;and a stretch of directly buried cable all called for special design considerations.POWER successfully completed the project on schedule and under cost estimates. POWER is a unique firm with all of our geothermal,transmission, substation,system studies,economic,and land services personnel centered at our Hailey,Idaho office facilities near Sun Valley.We have found that maintaining the range of multidisciplinary personnel under one roof enhances creativity and communication,and also eliminates coordination among satellite offices or a host of subcontractors. POWER personnel hold solid,in-depth experience in geothermal and transmission systems,and the firm is recognized as one of the leading consulting firms in the West providing complete consulting services to the electrical utility industry.Our projects have spanned the United States, from a quaint Vermont setting to rugged and remote terrain in Alaska and Hawaii. Together with Hart Crowser,Inc.of Anchorage,we are proposing a cohesive project team with the knowledge and experience to expertly meet the needs of the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study as outlined in the Power Authority's RFP scope of services. In addition,neither POWER nor Hart Crowser are new to Alaska work. Personnel in both firms have acquired considerable arctic and subarctic experience in a range of settings.Thus our experience,combined with a fresh outlook on the Unalaska Geothermal Project,will result in a thorough investigation into existing conditions and creative approaches to both geothermal system development and direct use applications. O315L y AIRPORT WAY -PO.BOX 1066 -HAILEY:IDAHO 83333-Ph.(208)788-3456 Ne Alaska Power Authority July 25,1986 Page Two Moreover,because the Unalaska Feasibility Study will involve'the Simultaneous coordination of a number of complex tasks--al]l within a constricted schedule--POWER's exclusive and computerized Project Management System will enable us to precisely plan,schedule,budget and monitor the project in detail.Project Status Reports are automatically printed out to inform POWER managers and Power Authority of the key indicators of project progress. Contact Person POWER's contact person for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Project will be Bill Lewis,P.E.Mr.Lewis is also the proposed Project Engineer for the study,and he can be reached at: POWER Engineers,Inc. P.O.Box 1066 1020 Airport Way Hailey,Idaho (208)788-3456 (phone) (208)788-2082 (telecopy) Proposal Expiration The enclosed proposal shall be effective for 120 days following receipt by the Power Authority. Contract POWER acknowledges the receipt and review of the Power Authority's sample "Professional Services Contract"listed in Exhibit C of the Unalaska Feasibility Study RFP.We hereby state that POWER will willingly comply with the contract and acknowledge that POWER is financially capable of following contract guidelines and rules. The enclosed proposal represents the sincerety of our interest in your project as well as our dedication to thoroughness and quality. Please carefully consider POWER for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Project.Thank you for extending POWER an opportunity to propose on this interesting project.I't]look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, POWER Engineers,Incorporated Bill Lewis Project Engineer O315L yy, POWER Engineers,Incorporated UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY STUDY RFP NO.APA-86-R-015 POWER ENGINEERS,INC. JULY 1986 Lobel) TABLE OF CONTENTS TI.PROJECT CONCEPT Technical Feasibility Issue Environmental Compatibility Economic Viability IIT.MANAGEMENT PLAN ee@©@¢@¢6¢@8@@@@Introduction Project Organization Project Team Organization Chart POWER Personnel Project Assignments Hart Crowser Personnel Project Assignments Time Commitment/Task Responsibility Chart Project Management System POWER Corporate Background Hart Crowser Corporate Background Facilities IIT.QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE e e eo e IV. 0315L Introduction Personnel Resumes Project Experience References SCOPE OF WORK Introduction Task Outlines Project Management and Control Geothermal Systems Assessment Transmission System Analysis Support Facilities Analysis Environmental Review,Assessment and Permitting Requirements Direct Use Geothermal Evaluation Power System Economic Analysis Findings and Recommendations Report Preparation IT-] II-] II-3 II-4 II-7 [I-12 II-13 II-2] [I-22 IT-24 [II-1 ITI-2 IITI-60 ITI-97 IV-] IV-2 IV-7 IV-9 IV-13 IV-20 [V-22 IV-27 IV-29 IV-3] IV-32 C20) Vv. VI. O315L TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont. SCHEDULE Schedule Comments Schedule COST PROPOSAL Overall Project Cost Summary POWER's Budgeting Process Power Authority Budget Categories Direct Labor Consultants/Subcontractors Other Contractual Itemized Equipment Materials and Supplies Computer Costs Travel Other Direct Costs Overhead and General Admin. Total Direct and Indirect Costs Fee Total Estimated Price of Proposal Cost Schedule A Cost Schedule B VI-1 VI-] VI-2 e@2ouer) I.PROJECT CONCEPT With growing power needs coupled with the potentially high cost of dieselgenerationwithintheCityofUnalaska(collectively the communities ofUnalaskaandDutchHarbor,Alaska)situated on the north end of Unalaska Istand on Unalaska Bay,the Alaska Power Authority (Power Authority)has been investigating whether alternative power sources could replace or supplant the diesel-powered generation system now serving approximately 1,500 consumers. Geothermal flow test results and reservoir analyses from a geothermal exploration program conducted during the summer of 1984 revealed asignificantlymoreproductiveresourcethananticipated.A geothermalresourceatthefootoftheMakushinVolcano,approximately 14 miles west of the City of Unalaska,was identified as having significant potential for development. In addition,the Power Authority's April 1985 "Unalaska/Dutch Harbor Reconnaissance Study Findings and Recommendations"states: Based on the findings of this reconnaissance level economic analysis,a geothermal power system plan,using diesel generators for peaking and backup,appears to be the mosteconomicalsourceofelectricpowerforthecommunityof Unalaska/Dutch Harbor under reasonable and moderate assumptions concerning population growth,electric load growth,and escalation rates in the price of diesel fuel. The report continues: It is recommended that the Alaska Power Authority initiate a detailed feasibility study of the geothermal power alternative at Unalaska.The feasibility study should concentrate on a number of issues that appear to have a significant effect on the economics of the proposed project. Consequently,the purpose of POWER Engineers,Inc.(POWER)'s proposedUnalaskaGeothermalFeasibilityStudywillbetodeterminewhetherdevelopmentofthegeothermalresourcewillmorereliablyandeconomically meet the power needs of the people of Unalaska Island. O315L I-] @D0Uef) We have identified the following three major areas of concern--all of which are interrelated and each of which could have a significant impact on the vitality of the proposed project. e Technical Feasibility Issues °Environmental Compatibility °Economic Viability These must be subjected to an in-depth investigation and favorable results obtained in each.POWER's feasibility study will address each of these topics,analyze the results,and provide a recommendation along with an approach for future courses of action.Please refer to the sections and subsections below for our preliminary consideration of each of the major issues surrounding the Unalaska Geothermal Project. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY ISSUES Reliability Among the many extremely important factors to be considered to determine technical feasibility,reliability is at the forefront--especially for remote and rugged sites with difficult access like the flank of Mt. Makushin.The first reliability consideration concerns selecting a system with proven operating experience in a commercial facility in a similar application. POWER personne]have been involved in the detailed design and startup of state-of-the-art geothermal systems.Therefore,we understand and greatly appreciate the difference between systems that test engineers have piloted with "excellent results"or feel have a "glowing future"and those that have been on-line and producing power over an extended period while being operated and maintained by a local staff. Modularization In addition to having a proven track record,the chosen generation system must be modularized or capable of being modularized.Considering the remoteness of the location,access difficulties (especially for equipment), and the four-month summer construction window,the reasons for modularity are obvious. Vendors producing modularized binary units should be considered.Some firms employ a standard method of production where modules are designed to be truck mounted for easy shipping.This is particularly useful for remote locations such as the Ormesa Project in the Imperial Valley of California. This project is composed of 26 modules of 1.2 megawatts each--all of which are being produced off-site and shipped to the site via standard flat-bed truck.This type of approach would be appropriate for the Unalaska Situation (POWER is the engineer on the above project for the term lenders, John Hancock Insurance and Teachers Annuity Insurance). Other types of technologies,however,should not be precluded because theyarenotnormallymodularized.Single-flash,double-flash and total-flow systems can be modularized with economic and other benefits.For example, Oxbow Geothermal,for which POWER performed a two-phase versus single-phase O315L [-2 DOWELEGNOSPONPT8BT flow gathering system analysis and is currently doing a silica scaling test,will save several million dollars on its 50 MW plant by selecting the least expensive flash system. Incremental Expansion Regardless of the technology selection,it is imperative that incremental expansion be provided for due to Unalaska's wildly fluctuating population and uncertain load growth forecasts.Additional growth projections for the Power Authority are to be completed in November,and these will be the basis for plant sizing.However,any projection is just that--a projection,someone's best estimate based on available data.Projections have been notoriously unreliable in many instances due to unforeseen events.Errors due to projection can be minimized by designing a plant that will meet baseload considerations in a low demand case and providing for easy incremental expansion. Conversion Efficiency The contract with the Aleut Corporation is similar to many of the contracts between resource companies and power producers in the Geysers Known Geothermal Resource Area (KGRA)of California where the resource company is paid strictly based upon power delivered to the grid,or,in this case to the City of Unalaska Utility.This means that energy conversion efficiencies are viewed as a secondary issue,whereas reliabilty,ease of operation and maintenance,modularization and ease of incremental expansion are certainly the overriding design considerations. Energy Conversion Technologies The types of technologies to be addressed in the study include Single-flash,double-flash,total-flow,binary and hybrid.Early in the project,POWER will conduct a technology screening study in which these technologies will be ranked according to their suitability in this application.The two lowest ranked technologies will be dropped from further considerations. The following are brief discussions on the types of systems available and some considerations on their respective applications for the Unalaska Geothermal Project. Single-Flash --Single-flash units typically have a wellhead separator that receives a two-phase flow from the well.These separators,normally purchased under a performance specification from firms such as Porta-Test, Vortec or Peeriess,split the incoming flow into its steam and liquid components.The steam is cleaned and sent to a steam turbine generator unit.Heat is rejected to an air-cooled condenser and the condensate is subsequently recombined with liquid from the separatorand then disposed of. Advantages of the single-flash system normally include simplicity of design and relatively low cost.Disadvantages include low energy conversion efficiency,high freezing potential for the condenser system,and somewhat greater difficulty in allowing for incremental expansion. 0315L [-3 Double-Flash --Double-flash units are similarly fed a two-phase flow whichissenttoahighpressureseparator.This unit operates at a higherpressurethanthesingle-flash unit's wellhead separator.The steam from the separator is fed to the high pressure side of a dual-inlet steam turbine generator set.The liquid from the separator is fed to another Separator where it is flashed again,and the low-pressure steam from thisflashisfedtothelow-pressure inlet of the turbine.Condensate is againcondensedinanair-cooled condenser,recombined with the fluid from the low-pressure flash separator and disposed of. Although somewhat more expensive than a single-flash unit,the double-flash system does provide for better energy conversion efficiency.However,double-flash units will have the same potential for freezing problems as aSingle-flash unit.Double-flash units also have a higher potential forscalingbecausethefluidfromthelow-pressure separator is cooler and the solids are more concentrated due to the removal of a greater fraction ofthefluidassteam. Total-Flow --Typically,total-flow units have a wellhead separator similartothesingle-flash and double-flash units,but instead of either disposingofliquidfromtheseparatororsendingittoasecondstageseparatoratlowerpressure,liquid is fed through a nozzle to a separator-turbine.TheBi-phase,impulse-type turbine and the helical screw expander are the two current designs for this type of machine.The steam from the wellhead separator is fed to the high-pressure inlet of a standard dual-pressure turbine generator,while steam from the separator turbine is fed to the low-pressure inlet.Heat is rejected to an air-cooled condenser similar to that of the single-flash and the double-flash systems. Helical screw units have not yet been installed in any commercial facilityandthuswillnotbeconsideredbecausetheyarenotyetcommerciallyproven.In addition,there is only one plant operating with a Bi-phase type unit,the Desert Peak Plant in Nevada.This is a relatively new plantwithoutagreatdealofoperatingexperience.When POWER visited this plant and reviewed its operation with the operator earlier this year,theBi-phase unit,although spinning,was not on-line generating power.WeweretoldofproblemssurroundingpropergearratiosbetweenthegeardrivenbytheBi-phase and the main turbine generator shaft.The problem appeared to be correctable,however,and parts were on order. At this time,it would be difficult to select a Bi-phase unit because of the scant commercial success evidence.However,there may be several months of operation by the time the Power Authority study is completed. The Bi-phase system has the same potential for freezing problems as theFlashunitsbutabetterenergyconversionefficiency. Binary --Binary units normally are fed a liquid geothermal stream that vaporizes and then superheats some type of working fluid,often isobutane or Freon.This working fluid,in turn,drives a turbine that drives a generator set.Ormat Systems,Inc.manufactures these as small modular units that are designed to fit on standard flat-bed trucks.In addition, there are other suppliers such as Barber-Nichols also manufacturing smal]modular units.Modular untts can be engineered in larger sizes,but there are currently no suppliers of standard units larger than slightly over one MW. O315L I-4 La With a resource being produced at two-phase flow conditions,steam would probably best be used in binary units arranged in a level configuration (this is done in some Ormat plants).The level one unit(s)would have steam fed to its superheater and vaporizer.The condensate from the vaporizer would be combined with the liquid from the separator and fed to the level two module. Other proposed ideas include using the steam for superheating only.This is possible,but even without utilizing the jevel arrangement concept,the method does not provide for the optimum thermodynamic balance and maximum usage of the resource. Binary units do not have the freezing problems flash units are prone to duetothefactthattheportionoftheunitexposedtoambientconditions,the condenser,has an organic or Freon working fluid instead of water on the tube side.Binary units are normally more expensive than flash units,although this may not be true in this case as the modularization technologyforsmallbinaryplantsismuchmoreadvancedthanitisforflashplants. Hybrid --Still another energy conversion system is the hybrid unit.Inthistypeofunitthesteamcouldbecleanedanddirectlyfedfromthewellheadseparatortoacondensingsteamturbinegeneratingset.The liquid would then be fed from the separator to the binary portion of the power conversion system. An alternate means of performing this power conversion,which would involve a simpler design with a lower capital cost by elimating the condenser andnon-condensable gas removal system on the steam turbine generator,is to put the steam from the separator to a non-condensing topping turbine thatwouldthenexhauststeamatsome5to7percentmoisturetoabinaryunit. In effect,the binary unit in this type of installation acts as pressurizedcondenserforthetoppingturbine.This type of scenario is proposed for the Mother Earth plant in Sulphurdale,Utah. Currently,Mother Earth Industries,Inc.is producing from a low-pressuresteamresourceandfeedingdirectlytofourbinaryunitsthatcondensethe steam,feed the condensate to the preheaters to remove additional energy,and then feed it to the injection system.This unit is designed to allowforthefutureinstallationofatoppingturbine.The topping turbine would remove some of the energy from the steam upstream of the binary units and result in an overall higher efficiency and better resource utilization.This design also has an inherent reliability advantage as thebinaryunitsandthetoppingturbinecanbedecoupledandrunseparately.For instance,if a problem develops with the topping turbine,a bypasswouldroutesteamaroundthetoppingturbineandfeedthesteam,via a control valve to reduce pressure,directly to the binary units.Anadditionalbenefitisthatthefreezingproblemiseliminatedalongwith the condenser. Resource Considerations Other technology considerations,aside from just the conversion technologybutdirectlyrelated,are those concerning the geothermal resource itself. O315L I-5 ODOM) Scaling --The first of these would be the potential for scaling.Although this appears to be a very clean resource,based on Republic data in the Unalaska Geothermal Exploration Project Executive Final Report and other reports on the resource,there is some potential for both silica and carbonate scaling., If carbonate scaling develops,it will probably occur in the well bore after the flowing liquid has flashed to two-phase. Silica scaling,if it is to occur,will develop on the low end of the temperature range.Flashing the resource,especially in the double-flash system where a greater percentage of the clean fluid is removed as steam, increases the potential for silica scaling.This is due to the fact that silica is concentrated by the removal of a fraction of the liquid that does not contain silica.Also,in this range,silica solubility decreases with temperature.Therefore,as the temperature is lowered,the solubility is decreased,resulting in a higher probability of scaling occuring. The factors affecting silica scaling may not be as important if a surface disposal method is used as the silica may precipitate out naturally downstream of the plant equipment in the drainage used for the disposal (as currently occurs with the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute demonstration plant in Hawaii).An evaluation of the silica and carbonate scaling potential of the fluid will be a part of POWER's feasibility study. Number of Producton Wells --Related primarily to the potential carbonate scaling of the well bore,but also to other potential well problems,is the consideration of one versus two production wells.Previous studies have indicated that the reservoir is adequate to produce the required fluid through one large production well.The problem with this concept is obvious--whatever redundancy is developed within the plant its null if there is no access to the geothermal resource. A possible alternative is to drill two smaller production wells with casing in the 9-inch diameter range so at least one well will always be available.If one well must be shut down to be cleaned,worked over,or for the maintenance of surface facilities,then at least 50 percent of the total production could still be maintained through the other well. Additional costs to drill the second well would be minimized as (1)the drill rig would already be on-site,(2)the smaller diameter well can be drilled faster than the large diameter well and (3)a smaller,less expensive rig may be suitable--from both the standpoints of actual rig costs and hauling to and from the drill site(s). Directional Drilling --Another resource/site consideration is the use of directional,or "slant",drilling.An alternative location may be found from which the known resource can be reached by slant drilling.Obviously, due to the relatively shallow depth of the resource,this cannot be too far from the existing ST-1 well location.However,anything that can be saved in terms of crossing the steep crevices surrounding the well site would benefit the project. O315L 'T-6 eoUel) Effluent Disposal Concerning disposal of spent fluids,surface disposal is the preferred alternative if it is shown to be environmentally acceptable--primarily because surface disposal is much cheaper than drilling and maintaining an injection well. However,water quality impacts and the potential for additional fog formation at the outfall point of the plant effluent system are problems associated with surface disposal.Injection of the spent fluid would require an expensive injection well and possibly result in a shortcircuitingofthecoolinjectedfluidsbacktotheresourceproductionwel] with a lowering of production fluid temperature. Transmission Line The most apparent transmission line corridor extends from the generationsitedowntheMakushinValleytoBroadBaycrossingthebaywith submersible cable or,alternatively,continuing overhead around the south end of the bay.The following comments are based on these two routingalternatives.However,all feasibile routes will be reviewed and the most appropriate routes investigated in detail to assure that the best line route is selected. The feasibility of a transmission line is heavily influenced by the routeselectionandclimacticconditions.While the terrain,geologic features, and climate on Unalaska are severe,many transmission lines have been built in similar environments where they operate successfully.POWER has been involved in the design of overhead transmission lines in the mountains ofWyomingandcentralIdahowhereelevationsexceeded8,000 feet andtemperaturesfallto-60°F.These lines are subjected to heavy snowfall,high winds and severe icing conditions without problem.Additionally,POWER has designed lines for the unique conditions encountered in Alaska.Similar lines include the Port Lyons-Terror Lake Line constructed for the Power Authority and the Chiniak-Pasagshak line for the Kodiak Electric Association,which is currently under construction. While it is anticipated that underground transmission facilities will notproveeconomicallyattractive,the use of underground transmission cablewillbeassessedtodetermineifitwarrantsdetailedconsiderationfor this project.This assessment will be based upon site-specific conditions. Maintenance and reliability of the transmission facility will be assessedintermsofthelikelihoodoffailure.Failure can be minimized through proper and conservative design procedures that consider unique on-siteconditionssuchasdeepsnowdepthsatthegenerationsite,and proper lineroutingtoavoidplacementofstructuresinareassubjecttosnoworearth slides or stream erosion. The need for access for line maintenance can be largely eliminated by proper structure placement as noted above.The selection of proper designcriteriaforspecialloadingconditionssuchasextremeicingorextremehighwindconditions,will be a major concern.By providing design 0315L 1-7 CLM) criteria that are specifically suited to the application of the linedesign,including structures clearance and conductor,the line will be able to withstand severe conditions to which it is exposed without invitingfailure. Should submersible cable be recommended,the emphasis will be toward usingacableofprovendesignlaiddownbypropertechniques.Preliminaryanalysissuggeststhatthecablecrossingvoltagemaybemadeat34.5kV orlower.This voltage range lends itself to the use of solid dielectric cable,thus avoiding the maintenance and additional expense associated with the oil reservoir and necessary monitoring and alarm systems. Underwater route selection will be made utilizing the services of 'URS Engineers,a firm experienced with working in Alaskan waters.Their bathymetric survey capability,coupled with knowledge of underwater routing,will provide for the selection of the most secure and practical route for the submersible cable.The selection of the underwater route is important to avoid damage to the cable both during installation and during operation due to cable movement or damage by anchors or fishing activity. The termination substation or switchgear will be located at the point of termination with the existing distribution on Unalaska or Dutch Harbor. This equipment siting will require coordination with the City of UnalaskaUtilitiesDepartmenttodevelopasuitablesite. Plant Siting The plant will be sited in accordance with site availability to the transmission line routing,fluid disposal methods,and resource and technology selection.Due to the extreme importance of plant siting,this subject will be considered as a separate category.One obvious option is to put the plant at the well site,dispose of fluids on site,and bring both a transmission line and a roadway to the site. Another option is to build the plant at a remote site and pipe two-phase flow to it.A variation on this theme is to separate the flow at the wellhead and pipe the steam and liquid to the plant separately.This would mean there would be single-phase flow to the plant,eliminating potential problems such as slug flow and hammering of the piping which could occur with two-phase flow systems. This scenerio,with a remote plant site and the wellhead separator at the existing well site,would best suit a single-flash plant because fluid could be flashed in the wellhead separator with just one steam line running to the plant and brine rejected either to an injection well or to surface drainage at the wellhead separator.Another siting possibility would be to locate the plant near the well and pump the effluent to a different drainage for disposal.All suitable sites,as identified by the Power Authority's current geologic and site investigations,will be evaluated and the optimum site selected. O315L I-8 C20) Road Routing There are two obvious potential routes for the road to the plant.OnewouldapproachfromDriftwoodBay,and the other would extend through the Makushin Valley.The location chosen for the plant will influence the selection of the road route.The road may be an all weather road,in which case it would be expensive to maintain,especially during the winter. Otherwise,it could be a construction road suitable for travel!by heavy equipment such as a drill rig,construction equipment and plant equipment during the summertime,but would not be maintained during the winter when access to the plant would be limited to helicopters and tracked snow vehicle. Remote Operation If the road is to be impassable during the winter,the plant would be built to have at least some remote operating capability with full remote monitoring possible from Dutch Harbor or Unalaska.If the plant is designed to operate unattended a majority of the time,an uninterruptable power supply system and local control systems to monitor plant operation and shut down equipment as necessary would be provided.This system would protect against machine damage resulting from low oil pressure,high oil temperature,high vibration,high generator winding temperatures,loss of flow,etc. Direct Use Direct use is another portion of the project directly related to the power plant.If the plant is located far from the well site with year-round accessability,then some downstream direct uses of the geothermal effluent from the plant might be feasible.The other alternative for direct use is dependent upon the U.S.Geological Survey's (U.S.G.S.)study of a suspected shallow,moderate-temperature resource in the Makushin Valley.POWER's feasibility study,the effect of the plant siting and the U.S.G.S.Survey data will be considered,and various probable direct use opportunities such as aquaculture,horticulture and district heating will be addressed. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY Air Quality The only normal air emmission will be the non-condensables from the plant. The majority of this stream will be CO,with lesser levels of various hydrocarbons and other gases.The primary pollutant in these non-condensables is hydrogen sulfide.The level of the hydrogen sulfide, however,will probably be very low and thus not likely to be considered an environmental problem.Emissions from the plant non-condensable gas stream will be calculated as a part of the total material balances for each technology and consequently considered in the overail environmental scheme. O315L 'T-9 @ Doel)AQBES PONDTAGT Water Quality Water quality will be a serious consideration.Concerning the surfacedisposaloftheeffluent,the Makushin River may not be able to absorb liquid effluent from the plant.The Makushin currently is said to support15fishingboatsandalreadyhaspoorwaterqualityduetovolcanic activity in the region. Siltation from road construction,transmission line construction and site grading is a potentially serious problem.<A possible mitigation measure would be to utilize Driftwood Bay as a construction and staging area for the power plant. Stream flow data is a specific concern.Geothermal effluent disposal is a related concern.While we can calculate the total quantity and temperature of effluent to be rejected to the stream,natural stream flow data is currently limited.We will have to gather available flow data,and extrapolate,or otherwise estimate,the stream flow to discern how the effluent would be diluted.Winter is probably the period of greatest concern due to the low stream flow.Possible mitigation measures for the liquid effluent would be treatment,piping to another watershed or injection. Visual,Wildlife and Other Impacts Most likely,the transmission line would be constructed down the Makushin Valley because surface impacts would be slight,and the primary impact would occur only during construction. Other environmental considerations of the acces road and transmission line Include: e Raptor protection of lines to protect sea birds and eagles in their roosting and nesting areas. e Makushin River salmon spawning. e Choosing beaching locations for the submersible cable,if required,that will not create conflict with other users. ¢Visual impact. *Surficial construction impacts;i.e.roads,dust,etc. e Fisheries impact of submersible cable. ECONOMIC VIABILITY It is possible,given sufficient funds,to design and build a geothermal plant on this resource.Also,given sufficient funds,mitigation measures could be taken or the plant design could be such that environmental concerns would not be a problem.However,sufficient funds are not necessarily available,and the plant must be capable of standing on its own economic merits. Current power generation for both the City of Unalaska municipal utility and also for processors in the area providing their own generation is via diesel generator units.The cost of existing diesel generation is the base case against which all geothermal scenerios must be compared.The cost for the diesel generation will be estimated or will be obtained from the City of Unalaska Utility. 0315L I-10 @?DOUSTQRBESPOODOAET Capital Cost POWER's first major step in the preparation of the economic analysis will be to do a capital cost estimate for the facilities.For the plant itself, the basis of this estimate for each technology will be: Process Flow Diagram with Heat and Material Balance Plot Plan Electrical One-Lines Equipment List with Outline Specifications Vendor Budget Quotations for Major Equipment Foundation Sketches for Major Equipment Take-offs from Design Sketches Combination of Take-offs and Factored Values for Material Quantities e Material Prices from Unalaska or Alaska Sources where Possible; Others Calculated Based on Contiguous U.S.Prices °Alaska Construction Labor and Contractor Cost for the Unalaska Site °Factored Contractor Indirect Cost and Fees The well cost will be based on budgetary quotations where possible,or on estimates from other facilities factored to the Unalaska site. Transmission facility capital cost estimates will be generated for a number of different line routes and termination points,including costs for both generation and termination substations.POWER transmission anddistributionprofessionalswillutilizeacombinationofvendorquotations for equipment and materials;construction labor and equipment costs from recently completed projects and contractor estimates. Operating and Maintenance Cost Operating and maintenance staffing requirements will be developed for eachplantdesign.Remote operation and monitoring will be considered whendevelopingtheseestimates.The basis for the staffing will be POWERpersonnelexperiencefromothergeothermalandoperatingplants.Costs forfuel,supplies,auxiliary power and other normal operating items will also be developed. Well operating costs will be based on wells situated on similar resourcesfactoredtoaccountforthesitelocation.Well operating costs will include workover operations and/or chemical cleaning.These,however,are expected to be minimal at this time based on the anticipated fractured production zone and the cleanliness of the resource.The resourceutilizationcostsorroyaltieswillbebasedonthecontractwiththeAleutCorporation.Also,the oil prices and other diesel generation O&M costsforthebasecasewillbeestimated,or if available from the utility at Unalaska,taken from their figures. Analysis of the capital and operating costs inputs will consist of acomparisionbetweenthevariousgeothermalplantoptionsandthedieselgenerationbasecaseusingtheunifiednetpresentworklifecyclecostanalysis.This analysis will be done using customized packaged software onPOWER's IBM personal computers.Part of the overall economic analysis will O315L I-11] ©?DOWEL address sensitivity to the various input parameters.We will vary the load growth scenario,oil prices,interest rates,the geothermal system capital costs and operating and maintenance cost estimates to see what their potential impact is on the overall project economics. For each system,the plant capacity and availability factors will be based On experiences at existing facilities using similar technology.These factors will be de-rated to account for remoteness of the location and access difficulty (which may lead to delivery delays for spare parts, maintenance staff,or technical specialists required to address specific equipment problems). Additionally,POWER's Transmission and Distribution staff will provide estimates of the operation and maintenance costs of the various combinations of transmission and station facilities developed for each of the reasonable tranmission scenarios. PROJECT CONCEPT --A FINAL NOTE As is demonstrated by our presentation of the preceding information and considerations,POWER fully understands the nature and complexity of the The Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study and the geothermal systems and transmission facilities to be investigated. We are proposing to perform all required tasks of the feasibility study with the assistance of only one major subcontractor,Hart Crowser,Inc., with offices in Anchorage and Seattle.Moreover,because our geothermal, transmission and substation personnel are all centered in our Hailey,Idaho office facility,communication and coordination are enhanced,and schedule lags due to mail and telephone delays are reduced to an absolute minimum. POWER geothermal personnel have worked in numerous sites in the western United States,including California's Geysers KGRA,Coso Hot Springs,and the Imperial Valley fields and Nevada's Dixie Valley and Soda Lake fields. In addition,our transmission and substation projects have brought reliable and economical power to remote and rugged locations throughout the nation, including Kodiak Island,Alaska and Kauai,Hawaii (please refer to the Qualifications and Experience section of this document).Routing transmission lines through difficult terrain with extreme weather conditions and stringent environmental stipulations is one of our corporate specialties. O315L I-12 eLabel) II.MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION POWER Engineers,Inc.(POWER)is an engineering consulting firm dedicated to meeting the needs of our clients by performing exemplary work,on time and on budget.POWER accomplishes this by performing only projects for which we are uniquely well-qualified,by staffing with top-notch professionals,by providing state-of-the-art computer systems and design aids,and by utilizing a sophisticated project management system developed in-house to define the project status and needs. POWER has on staff a team with in-depth experience in ail aspects of geothermal systems engineering from conceptual design,cost estimates and feasibility analysis to detailed design and start-up.In addition,POWER employs a group of transmission and substation design engineers who, through their expertise and quality of work,have made POWER a leader in this field. POWER is also familiar with Alaskan environmental considerations and various state and federal regulations.However,due to the complexity of the environmental,siting and support facility issues associated with this project,POWER was pleased to invite Hart Crowser,Inc.,a firm with an excellent reputation and extensive Alaska and arctic experience in the full range of environmental,land,and geotechnical services to join the project team as a subcontractor (see page II-21). PROJECT ORGANIZATION All projects undertaken by POWER are organized under the overall direction of a project manager.This individual is selected from among the senior engineers and must possess both proven management capability and experience in the primary technology area of the project. POWER's Mr.Al Munio specifically meets both criteria and has thus been selected as the Project Manager.Mr.Munio will be personally responsible for ensuring that the project is completed on time and within the established budgetary parameters. 0315L 11-1 @ Doel)ERGNBESWCUTABS . As this is a relatively large,complex study project,we have assigned a project engineer with substantial geothermal and project management experience,Mr.Bill Lewis,P.E.As Project Engineer,Mr.Lewis,will report directly to Mr.Munio and will be responsible for coordinating anddirectingtheday-to-day activitiesof the project.He will be responsibleforassistingtheprojectmanagerinmonitoringallfacetsoftheproject and directing or redirecting resources as needed to maintain the schedule and budget. Lead discipline engineers and technical specialists are responsible for each of the major project tasks as defined in Section IV,Scope of Work. These individuals are responsible for the costs,schedule and quality of work for all support personnel contributing to the successful completion of their tasks.They will report directly to the project engineer and interface with other task leads,the subcontractors,and the Power Authority. The Project Organization Chart on the next page illustrates the positions of the key Project Team members and the lines of coordination, communication and authority.A synopsis of each of the project team key personnel and their project assignments follows the Organization Chart.As the Project Organization Chart indicates,POWER's principal subcontractor for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study will be Hart Crowser,Inc. Their lead personnel,Jim Gill,P.£.,and Dr.James Rybuch,CEP.,will be responsible for the Support Facilities Analysis and Environmental Studies, respectively.POWER's in-house specialists for these two areas,(Mark Forbord for the Support Facilities Analysis,and Frank Rowland for the Environmental Studies tasks),will provide monitoring and quality control services.They will also assist in the report preparation tasks of the study. Tying our team together is the POWER Project Management System.It provides the framework in which all POWER jobs are proposed and managed. At its most basic,it is a philosophy.which defines POWER's approach and methods for managing our projects.It starts with reducing each of our projects into manageable segments,termed tasks and subtasks.Then the scope of work associated with each of these increments is carefully defined.(These subtask writeups may be found in this proposal in Section IV,Scope of Work.)After the project definition is complete,a schedule and budget are prepared for each subtask.This data is entered into the Project Management computer program developed by POWER and forms the basis for the generation of the Project Status Reports.For the billing period in question,these reports show budgeted expenditures,actual expenditures, variations between the two,scheduled and actual percent complete,and projected over-runs or under-runs at project completion for each subtask. A detailed discussion of the POWER Project Management System may be found later in this section. O315L II-2 eLeler) ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY STUDYPOWERENGINEERS,INC. PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART APA PROJECT MANAGER DAVID DENIG-CHAKROFF POWER ENGINEERS PROJECT ENGINEER BILL LEWIS,P.E. ([ [ POWER ENGINEERS POWER ENGINEERS HART _CROWSER ")HART _CROWSER POWEA ENGINEERS GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS +[TRANSMISSION SYSTEM.AN.SUPPORT FACILITIES ANALYSIS ENVIRONMENTAL,REGULATORY ECONOMIC ANALYSIS BILL LEWIS,P.E.,LEAD UOHN MCGREW,LEAD &PERMIT REQUIREMENTS JOHN CAVANAUGH,PE.RON SCHROOER,P.E. MAPK FORBOAO,P.E.LARAY HENRIKSEN,P-E.JIM GILL,P.€..LEAD DA.JAMES RYBOCK,CEP,LEAD JEFF ROSTBERG,LEAD DALE KRAMER,EIT PETE VAN DEA MEULEN STEVE ROG GAIL THOMPSON,PhD.CLAY FITCH :MEL HAYOB,P.E.PHIL THOMAS ARCTIC ENVIRONMENTALANDTECHNICALDATACENTER WILLIAM WILSON PAUL MEYER CDI) POWER Personnel Project Assignments Al Munio -Project Manager With nearly thirty years experience in all facets of industrial engineering,and in particular mechanical engineering,Mr.Munio will serve as Project Manager for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.He has substantial background in geothermal systems design for both generation and direct use facilities,process piping,HVAC,environmental control systems, boiler plants,and power generation facilities.He has managed numerous projects and feasibility studies related to geotherma!generation and power systems and has served as Lead Mechanical Engineer on various geothermal design projects. As Project Manager,Mr.Munio will bear overall responsibility for project personnel,conceptual design,subcontractor interface,scheduling,and budgeting.He will monitor all task and subtask completion,and will interface with and report directly to the Power Authority's project manager for this study. Bill Lewis,P.E.-Project Engineer/Process Engineer With more than ten years specialized experience in geothermal and chemical process engineering,Mr.Lewis will serve as Project Engineer/Process Engineer for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.He has experience with single-flash,double-flash,binary and hybrid system design for utilization of geothermal resources.He has handled projects from the conceptual design stage through final acceptance testing and startup. A portion of Mr.Lewis'applicable experience includes the design of a 10MW double-flash geothermal plant for Union Oi];the conceptual design and study for a 10 MW double-flash plant for Imperial Energy;the detailed design of a steam gathering system at the Geysers for Aminoil (now Geysers Geothermal)which supplies PG&E Unit 16;the feasibility evaluation of a 5 MW binary geothermal plant and its subsequent privatization in Idaho;the conceptual design and feasibility study for a wellhead-type binary system for several geothermal resources;and the conceptual design for a 60MW gross-hybrid geothermal system incorporating reheat for a plant in Nevada. As Project Engineer,Mr.Lewis will maintain responsibility for all conceptual design engineering for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.He will supervise each of the discipline task leaders and wil} ensure that all tasks are completed on schedule and within their designated cost parameters.He will report directly to Mr.Munio and will frequently interface with:Power Authority's project manager for this study. Jeff Rostberg -Lead Cost and Economic Analyst Mr.Rostberg has solid cross-training.and project experience in the costandeconomicanalysisoftransmissionsystems.His substantial experience in performing cost of service studies,rate and tariff analysis,average system cost determination,power requirement studies,and system loss analysis,combines well with his management of the planning,design,and construction of all types of distribution,substations,and transmission O315L II-4 @D0Uet lines through 230kV.He has administered three open-ended Title I,II,and III Western Area Power Administration A/E contracts for the Sacramento and Boulder City offices.He will be directly responsible for the performance of the detailed life-cycle cost analyses of power system alternatives,and will report to Mr.Lewis. Clay Fitch -Economic Analyst Mr.Fitch,as the former manager of Administrative Services for a Nevada Utility,will perform all detailed economic analysis for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.He is experienced in power requirements studies,projecting growth in a utility service area,preparing long range financial plans,projecting long term debt,and analyzing the economic feasibility of new transmission systems.He will report directly to Mr. Rostberg. John Cavanaugh,P.E.-Instrumentation and Controls Engineer Mr.Cavanaugh has seven years experience in the design,installation, calibration and start-up of instrumentation and controls.He has worked with voltages from 125VDC to 69kV and has designed microprocessor-based control systems with interactive CRTs.He is also well versed in analog, digital and pneumatic instruments.He will provide I&C expertise in the evaluation of a geothermal plant and will report directly to Mr.Lewis. Dale Kramer -Electrical Engineer With fourteen years of electrical engineering experience,Mr.Kramer hasengineeredavarietyofprojectsrangingfromhigh-voltage substations.todamcontrolandgenerationplantelectricalsystems.He has worked with a number of programable control systems including the Bailey Network 90 Control System.His industrial electrical engineering experience also includes designing numerous lighting systems,including high-pressure sodium lighting (both indoor and outdoor).Moreover,he regularly carries projects through from start-up to design review,construction support and record drawing production.He will perform al]in-plant electrical engineering design and will report directly to Mr.Lewis in the evaluation of the various options of geothermal power plants. Mark Forbord -Civil/Structural Engineer and Coordinator With over seven years experience in the engineeering of industrial and power plant projects,Mr.Forbord will serve as a Civil/Structural Engineer for the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.He has particular experience in sitework,overland pipe support and foundation design,static and dynamic analysis and design of equipment foundations,structural design of buildings and their foundations,and power plants support facilities using structural steel,masonry,wood and reinforced concrete construction.He will assist Mr.Lewis in the Civil/Structural design and cost estimating for the geothermal plant options.Mr.Forbord will also O315L [1-5 @D0lef) serve aS a coordinator of quality control and monitoring of the Support Facilities Analysis for the project.He will work closely with Mr.Jim Gill of Hart Crowser on this task. John McGrew -Lead Transmission Engineer Mr.McGrew,as Lead Transmission Line Engineer,will have overall responsibility for the technical,cost estimating,and construction feasibility studies involved in the selection and evaluation of transmission line designs and alternative routes,generation substation designs,termination substation designs,and distribution system review. He will direct,coordinate and manage the efforts of the individuals assigned to this portion of the project.Mr.McGrew is a seasoned project engineer with extensive experience.He is currently managing a 50-mile 24.9kV line across Kodiak Island for the Kodiak Electric Association.In addition to his project management responsibilities,Mr.McGrew was responsible for routing and oversaw the detailed design of this line across rugged and heavily forested terrain.He provides a balance of field experience,technical competence,and Alaskan experience to this critical portion of the study.Mr.McGrew will report directly to Mr.Lewis. Ron Schroder,PE -Lead Substation Engineer Mr.Schroder,as Lead Substation Engineer,will be directly responsible for developing and evaluating substation designs for interconnecting the generation station to the transmission line and the transmission line to the existing distribution system.He will also develop.protective relaying,SCADA,and communications systems requirements required for the substations and transmission line.His efforts will be coordinated and directed by Mr.McGrew. Mr.Schroder is currently project engineer for Phase II of the Beluga Substation,a major 230kV substation project for Chugach Electric Association.Mr.Schroder has experience in relaying,communications,andcontrol.to complement his substation and construction experience.This,coupled with his current and ongoing Alaskan work uniquely qualifies him for his duties as Lead Substation Engineer for this study. Pete Van Der Meulen -Technical Advisor Mr.Van Der Meulen is a transmission line engineer with broad design and project management experience in transmission line design and construction in mountainous terrain and harsh environments both in the lower 48 and Alaska.His special expertise in line routing and construction in rough terrain will be utilized by Mr.McGrew to select and review potential routes for the transmission line and to review the alternate transmission line and substation designs when arriving at recommended alternatives for the transmission system. O315L TI-6 @L0MeL Mel Hayob,PE --Technical Advisor Mr.Hayob is an engineer with extensive studies and substation experience. He will support Mr.Schroder and Mr.McGrew in evaluating the electrical performance of alternative transmission voltages and conductor sizes and identifying and evaluating alternative substation designs. Larry Henriksen,PE -Technical Advisor Mr.Henriksen is an engineer whose experience includes serving as chief engineer of an electric utility with overall responsibility for transmission,distribution,budgeting,and system planning.He also has substantial substation,SCADA,and transmission line project experience. He will assist Mr.McGrew in analysis of the interconnection to the existing distribution system and other areas as directed. Ken Lagergren -Transmission Engineer Mr.Lagergren has been responsible for the mechanical design of transmission lines in mountainous terrain and harsh environments throughout the Western United States inluding Alaska.He will perform the preliminary line design for transmission alternatives,assist in the development of design parameters for the alternative lines,and assist in the evaluation of line routes.He will report directly to Mr.McGrew. Frank Rowland -Environmental Coordinator As an experienced environmental and land services manager,Mr.Rowland will work with Hart Crowser as POWER's interface on the assessment of environmental concerns.He will provide monitoring and quality control services and will assist Mr.Lewis in the final report preparation. Mr.Rowland served as the Environmental Manager on the Power Authority's Terror Lake to Port Lions 13.8/24.9kV Distribution Line and has numerous land services projects to his credit. Hart Crowser,Inc.-Key Personnel Overall Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Project direction for Hart Crowser, Inc.will be the responsibility of Mr.James D.Gill,P.E.,Senior Associate Engineer for Hart Crowser. Hart Crowser personnel who will be responsible for implementing Task 3 - Support Facilities Analysis include the following: O315L TI1-7 ODOM) James D.Gill,P.E.-Lead Geotechnical Engineer Mr.Gill has over 19 years of varied engineering and project management experience including more than 6 years in Alaska.From 1980 to 1983,he managed the field program in both the engineering and environmental areas for the FERC licensing phase of the Susitna Hydroelectric Project for the Alaska Power Authority.His responsibilities included access road planning,transmission line corridors studies,and coordination with the environmental study and design groups.He participated in the preparation of several of the FERC license exhibits.Since 1983,he has directed the Seward Coal Facility Project,including environmental permitting and geotechnical engineering,managed several arctic offshore investigations in the Alaska Beaufort Sea and under subcontract to Tryck,Nyman &Hayes, reviewed the engineering and environmental constraints for alternatives to the construction of the Endicott Causeway west of Prudhoe Bay in i984 for the Alaska District Corps of Engineers.He also developed construction scenarios and costs for five Air Force North Warning System sites in Alaska in 1985 and 1986.He is currently Project Manager for the design team on the Eklutna Water Project Lake Diversion Project,to which he is committed for approximately one-third of his time. Mr.Gill will work closely with Mr.Forbord on the Support Facilities Analysis and will report directly to Mr.Lewis. Stephen R.Rog -Project Geologist Mr.Rog has over 11 years of diverse geological experience on various engineering,construction,and exploration projects throughout Alaska and the Western U.S.Project responsibilities have included technical management,data collection and evaluation,field logistics and subcontractor coordination,instrumentation installation and monitoring, construction inspection,and laboratory testing.Mr.Rog has worked on a variety of projects,including arctic offshore site investigations,arctic and sub-arctic foundation studies,remote site explorations,pipelines, geotechnical instrumentation,dam site investigations,mineral resource evaluations,geologic hazard assessments,tunnels,railroads,military facilities (MX,BMD)and multi-disciplinary environmental assessment projects.Mr.Rog has been responsible for remote field investigation projects and is also familiar with the permit and regulatory aspects for conducting these projects throughout Alaska.Mr.Rog will assist in reviewing existing data and participate in the site visits.He will report directly to Mr.Gill. Ross D.Rieke -Geotechnical Engineer Ross Rieke is a Project Engineer on the Anchorage staff of Hart Crowser. He will assist in analyzing dock and road options for the project.As a Registered Professional Engineer with over 5 years experience,he has been involved in numerous marine and transportation projects and is familiar with the problems of developing projects in the subarctic environment.He will report directly to Mr.Gill. O395L II-8 CLUE/ Hart Crowser personnel responsible for implementing Task 4 -Assessment of Environmental Regulation and Permitting Requirements,include the following: Dr.James Rybock,CEP -Environmental Scientist Dr.Rybock.has thirteen years experience in managing multi-disciplinary environmental projects throughout Alaska and the Pacific Northwest.He has directed field programs,site and route selection studies,feasibility analysis,and permitting of new project developments,such as power plants and transmission lines,ports and pipelines,radar stations,hazardous waste facilities,and others.His ongoing Alaska experience includes Environmental Impact Statements for both the North Warning System and the Over-the-Horizon Backscatter <(OTH-B)radar projects,and he served as Project Manager for the Alaska Railroad coal export project,the Anchorage Wetlands Study,and the Yukon-Kuskokwim coastal zone resource inventory. Dr.Rybock has considerable experience in the development and application of measurable criteria for ranking and selecting among alternative sites and routes,and he is very knowledgeable about permit and regulatory requirements in Alaska. Dr.Rybock will be responsible for the Environmental and Permitting requirements and will work closely with Frank Rowland of POWER.He will be directly responsible to Mr.Lewis. Dr.Gail Thompson -Environmental/Cultural Resources Specialist Dr.Thompson has twelve years experience conducting and managing cultural resource studies for government and commercial projects in the westernUnitedStatesandAlaska.Her responsibilities have included developing© study plans,estimating and tracking budgets and schedules,supervising project personnel,and serving as liaison among clients,agencies and Native American groups.Specific representative projects of Dr.Thompson include the following:cultural resources and subsistence sections for the NEPA EIS for the U.S.Air Force North Warning System at multiple sites on the North Slope and Interior Alaska:cultural resources and subsistence studies for the OTH-B radar project in southcentral Alaska;cultural, scenic and natural features work for the Skagit-Hanford Nuclear Power Project,Washington;cultural resources survey and testing for Quartz Hill Mine access road,near Ketchikan;a historical study documenting trade, travel,and commercial development within the Koyukuk drainage of Alaska; inventory and assessment program for FERC licensing of West Creek Hydroelectric Project,near Skagway;and the cultural resources program for the Susitna Hydroelectric Project,southcentral Alaska.Dr.Thompson also has considerable experience consulting with Native American groups and corporations.Dr.Thompson will report directly to Dr.Rybock. Mr.William Wilson -Aquatic Scientist Mr.Wilson is a specialist in hydraulic and aquatic habitat modeling and instream flow assessment to predict fishery and aquatic habitat effects from power development,mining,and logging projects.His other professional capabilities include marine and estuarine fisheries,with O315L II-9 DOME) emphasis on coastal .shellfish resources.Mr.Wilson was principal investigator of aquatic system simulation modeling and impact assessment for the Susitna Hydroelectric Project in southcentral Alaska,and he has authored and co-authored many reports on the effects on fisheries and aquatic habitats of artificial arctic marine gravel island construction, several small-scale hydroelectric projects and coal extraction in Alaska. -In addition,he has evaluated the physical and biological constraints pertinent to the siting of martne ports in western Alaska.Mr.Wilson also possesses a strong background in investigations of pollutant and thermal effects on marine,estuarine,and freshwater aquatic systems.He has 15 years of experience as an aquatic scientist,11 of those in Alaska.Mr. Wilson will report directly to Dr.Rybock. Mr.Paul Meyer -Hydrologist Mr.Meyer,an instructor and researcher for Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEIDC),specializes in computer applications of hydrologic and thermal processes.He has experience in the development and application of saturated and unsaturated groundwater flow and temperature models,watershed models,snowmelt models,and river and urban hydraulic models.While at AEIDC,Mr.Meyer has been primarily involved with computer modeling for the Aquatic Impact Assessment of the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project;this work included detailed water balance and river temperature modeling.He has also been involved in runoff modeling and flood potential analysis of glacierized basins.Three of his six years professional experience have been in Alaska.Mr.Meyer will report directly to Dr.Rybock. Mr.Philip Thomas -Land Use Planner Mr.Thomas has six years of experience managing and conducting visual and land use studies for a variety of corridor projects in the western U.S.and Alaska.He has been responsible for the collection and analysis of regional constraint and opportunity data,site evaluation,data collection and mapping,impact assessment,and report preparation.For the U.S.Air Force North Warning Radar System in Alaska,he conducted land use and recreation studies.The study involved evaluation of alternate sites and assessment of impacts to existing and future land use and recreational activities.Other projects of Mr.Thomas'include:urban land use and visual studies for Power Operations Building siting in Tempe and Scottsdale,Arizona;land use and visual studies for evaluation of potential power plant sites in Arizona for the Salt River Project;and coordination of resource study team and management of data for nine resource studies of the Western Area Power Administration's Great Falls to Conrad Transmission Line Siting Project in Montana.Mr.Thomas will report directly to Dr.Rybock. O315L II-10 C20) CURRENT WORKLOAD AND STAFF AVAILABILITY The nature of consulting work is that,at any given time,many projects will be "on the books"of the firm in various stages of completion ranging from the beginning stages of project initiation to the final stages of project closeout and record data preparation. POWER and its subcontractor,Hart Crowser,Inc.have carefully reviewed projected workloads and determined that sufficient human and physical resources will be available to complete the project as budgeted and scheduled.This is illustrated by the percentage of time available for commitment to the project of the project team members tabulated on the following page. O315L II-11 VERS AITIDAEESDOW PROJECT TEAM AVAILABLE COMMITMENT LEVEL Available Commi tment Task/Subtask Name Project Function Level*Assignments John Cavanaugh,P.E.Instrumentation/Controls Engineer 50%30.01 Mark Forbord,P.E.Civil/Structural Engineer/Coordinator 50%30.01,30.03 Clay Fitch Utility Analyst 70%30.06 James Gill,P.E.Lead Geotechnical Engineer 10%30.03 Mel Hayob,P.E.Technical Advisor (Substation)20%30.02 Larry Henriksen,P.E.Technical Advisor (Transmission)302 30.02 Dale Kramer,EIT Electrical Engineer 502 30.01 Ken Lagergren Transmission Engineer 20%30.02 Bill Lewis,P.E.Project Engineer/Process Engineer 95%Overall project responsibilityplusspecificresponsibility for30.00,30.01, 30.07,30.08 John McGrew Lead Transmission Engineer 502 30.02 Paul Meyer Hydrologist 10%30.04.03 Al Munio Project Manager 50%Overall project ,responsibilityplusspecificresponsibility for30.00,30.05, 30.07,30.08 Ross Rieke,P.E.Geotechnical Engineer '10S 30.03.03,30.03.04 Stephen Rog,P.G.Project Geologist 20%30.03.01,30.03.02 30.03.05 Jeff Rostberg Lead Cost and Economic Analyst 25%30.06 Frank Rowland 'Land Services/Environmental Coordinator 15%30.04 Dr.James Rybock,CEP Environmental Scientist 10%30.04.01,30.04.02 30.04.03,30.04.04 Ron Schroder,P.E.Lead Substation Engineer 25%30.02 Phillip Thomas Land Use Planner 20%30.04.01,30.04.04 Dr.Gail Thompson Environmental /Cultural Resources Specialist 20%30.04.01,30.04.02 Pete Van Der Meulen Technical Advisor (Transmission)15%30.02 William Wilson Aquatic Scientist 20%30.04.03 *Based on an average percentage of a normal 40-hour work week throughout the project duration.Actuallevelofcommitmentrequiredmaybelessthanavailable.Actual commitment levels for any given timeperiodintheprojectmayvary.from overall average commitment level. 03176L a |@DOL) POWER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INTRODUCTION POWER's Project Management System is structured to ensure our projects are completed on schedule and within budget for satisfied owners.This system has been a key element responsible for POWER's reputation and growth.This section describes POWER's Project Management System and how it benefits our clients. CONCERNS Project overruns and schedule slippages are the problems most commonly encountered in the engineering services industry today. Problems related to inaccurate project definition,scheduling or budgeting generally result in project overruns and schedule slippages.These are interdependent concerns and will be faced by most owners,to one degree or another,on nearly every project undertaken. Additionally,the risks inherent in conducting a successful project are compounded by the complexity,schedule and participation levels required. The answer to systematic,successful project management of complex and simple projects alike lies in reducing projects into manageable segments, services,tasks and subtasks that are independently defined,scheduled, budgeted,tracked and managed. OWNER PARTICIPATION POWER encourages owners to actively participate in project management as an integral part of each project management team. In recognition of the value of active owner participation,POWER provides owners with the elements of our interactive Project Management System that incorporates Project Work Plans,Schedules and Budgets in a cross-referenced system developed in-house specifically for the management of utility and industrial engineering projects. The primary purpose of the system is to provide accurate information quickly and easily,enabling project owners,managers and engineers to quickly make informed,accurate decisions. MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES The four fundamental project management processes necessary for successful project initiation and completion are: Complete and accurate definition of the Work Plan. Generation of a realistic and definitive Schedule. Development of a comprehensive and accurate Budget. Execution and follow-through of the Project Plan. O3T5L II-13 CD20) Together,the project Work Plan,Schedule and Budget constitute the Project Plan. PROJECT PLAN Once POWER's project team has been defined,responsible individuals and departments generate a Project Plan by following the steps of our Project Management System outlined below. Work Plan The project Work Plan includes Task Sequence Diagrams (flow charts)and Task Descriptions outlining the scope of work. A project-specific Task Sequence Diagram is developed for each service.These diagrams serve as easily referenced project panoramas for all participants involved in planning and tracking.Task Sequence Diagrams not only graphically describe the entire process,but also function as a checklist during the development of the Task Descriptions,Project Schedule and Budget. Project-specific Task and Subtask Descriptions are developedattheirrespectivelevelsandserveasadefinitionofal] work activities or events. Project Schedule O315L Preparation of a project Schedule is critical for posting overall project dimensions to both management and the project team personnel.Schedule preparation takes place coincidently with Work Plan preparation. Schedules are developed for each service at the Subtask level.Next,service tasks are accumulated and incorporated into a comprehensive Master Schedule for projects involving multiple services. As the project proceeds,standard Schedule maintenance procedures are employed as project Status Reports are issued.This process ensures the project Schedule reflects the actual project status at any given time. Project Budget Subsequent to the development and review of Task Descriptions and project Schedules,man-hour and expense budgets are generated for each Subtask.The results are accumulated through the Subtask,Task and Project levels. TT-14 @ DOUet )CIQIBAS PNDOBET e Budgets are prepared using the Task Description Worksheets, and man-hours and expenses are entered at the Subtask level for each activity or event. e A summary report is generated combining labor and expenses. Using this system,adjustments to the budget due to schedule and/or work scope changes can be easily accommodated.A new budget can be generated whenever required.This feature allows POWER to respond quickly to owner needs. Status Reports °Project Status Reports are generated weekly,monthly and quarterly to assess budgeted and actual project progress. These reports provide the owner and POWER management with the following information at Subtask,Task and Project levels: °Budget Allocated for the current reporting period. Allocated to date. Total Allocated. Average labor cost per hour budgeted. e Actual -Expenditures for the current reporting period. -Expenditures to date. -Actual average labor cost per hour. °Status !Variation between budgeted and actual expenditures of dollars or man-hours to date. Budgeted dollars or man-hours remaining as of the reporting date. Scheduled percentage of completion to date. Percentage of budgeted dollars or man-hours expended to date. Actual percentage of completion,as reported to date. °Projection -Percentage variation--expended versus actual percentage of completion to date.-Dollar 'or man-hour variation--expended versus actual percentage of completion to date,projected through project completion. O315L IT-15 e@ Doel) TASK IDENTIFICATION POWER's Project Management System uniquely defines,schedules,budgets and tracks each Subtask by an identification number that allows management to monitor the status of each Task from project initiation through completion. Task Identification Key _30 Project 30.01 Task 30.01.01 Subtask *The first two digits of the task identification number uniquely identify the project. e After the first decimal,the next two digits define the project Task. Each specific Subtask Identification number can be tracked throughout our proposals and subsequent projects,as well as from Task Sequence Diagrams and Task Descriptions within the Work Plan to the Project Schedule,to the Project Budget and,ultimately,to the Project Status Reports. The Subtask identification number assures immediate and direct access to the description,duration,budget and status of the multitude of individual Subtasks that constitute the Project. THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POWER's Project Management System is activated upon receipt of a potential client's Request for Proposal (RFP)rather than on receipt of the owner's Notice to Proceed (NTP).Consequently,the Project Management System data base is developed as part of POWER's proposal process and is,therefore, not a cost to the owner. Once the Project Plan has been reviewed and revised by the owner,it is entered into the system.Other inputs to the system are: Time Cards -Weekly Expense Vouchers -Weekly Percent Completion Reports -Monthly Change Orders -As Required All inputs are coded and charged against specific Subtask numbers. Man-hours and expenses are recorded and tracked on all projects. Preparation of the Project Status and Exception Reports is an automatic function of the system.Once the Schedule and Budget parameters have been defined for each Subtask,and following approval by the owner,the system produces Exception Reports as a part of the Status Reports.These exception reports identify Subtasks that approach,or exceed,preset parameters. O315L II-16 DOL) PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS The pictogram on the following page graphically shows POWER's Project Management System and the interactive relationships of the system's components. The process is designed to handle large scale projects with multiple Phases and/or multiple Service requirements (design,Construction Management, procurement,etc.).For a project involving only one segment and one service,the Project Management System is reduced to the Task level for scheduling,budgeting,tracking and reporting. O315L II-17 ZOU) TIME CARDS &EXPENSE CHITS ©POWER BUDGET SCHEOULE PROJECT PROPOSAL TASK DESCPT TASK SEQ PROJECT ; |POWER INITIATION f,'. OWNER-POWER MGMT.TEAM PROPOSAL REVIEW &REVISION XY POWER ENGINEERS,INC. © POWER MGMT.TEAM CHANGE ORDER REVIEWTIMECARD8EXPENSE PROJECTPROPOSAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASK IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM SUPERVISOR PROJECT PROJECT PLAN inace PERCENTCOMPLETIONsuttisn[|REPORTS Qu YOADINNGPROJECTION> CHANGE ORDERS CHANGE ORDERS PROJECT SCHEDULE ©|oweR PROJECT SCHEDULES TASK SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS POWER TASK SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS - -S§.@ TASK MANAGERPROJECTENGINEERREVIEW a CASH FLOW PROJECTION PROJECT ENGINEER REVIEW SERVICEae 'SUBTASK LEVEL @ PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Ne _-_-_SUPERVISOR ® OWNER-POWER MGMT.TEAM PROJECT STATUS REPORTS © POWER ENGINEERS,INC.HAILEY,IDAHO 1h& BRUM stalys RERGET FUTEMT: HsOECT: SEGAEWt AHO SUNS TaStS SUET ASHE LEFTERCAL (@ Sif SERVICES FATES,BEUTEW STAT ACTIVITIES Bate beqeition Gest pe Racal Srocerbite-RaialEvalvation2Fe:vamerctat vansJimieet.Wra-Ling Diese FEEL INI aes FESTEW ot LIME CIAts at Deve P feal-re VR"Sete Ore LateTOUSustesBretireABEOLSveteweeLineforexConivedCentere-Lane SeSTEN SYUGTES Short CreveatSeraeSrotectionGramedinsFeantremecls FLAN tRARTOCS Geraesal Fant Control Foow Lqnyaest Fonw, HECOWECOL SFELHF ECAT TNS denittication SelectionEonpeentSeerfieations,Rateriad SpeciFiralsce,bravites Gate Stmrttels CTEOL SCHEMETICS SERICE:-Electrical Desay PRSEOD EMDIWC:a o 6S D.tr aeer Sunnah1 FERSOD:4 wees GUOGET ECO 'D PREC StAtUs i PROVECY OM t 'bees see seceoee see e eee csect i 1 1 'ube 5 PERCENT COMPLETION ' HEFEOG 10 DATE TOT |}|FERIOG «TO DATE 1 GARTATION PEMATNTWG |GUDCETED ©EXFEWDEG ©ACTUAL f-YAPIATION UARTSTIOW|os S WSF eS wes 7 1 t 21 x ws Pena?STATIS MEFTAT SEPUICES,Electrical Design PERTOD ENDING FRQECT UEERs a ESF:0.Kraeer SUMMARY FERTOD:4 vests YSSUE bales i UE 'ACTUAL 1 STAtys:i]PeQUECT TOW 27 RLELTOICAL OESTGM SERUTCES ''\ 1 PERIOD 10 DATE TOI 1 PERIOD.«TD GATE 1 VARTATION RENAIWIMG 1 RUOCETED «EXPENDED ©ACTUAL «1 UAPIATION UANIATION |1USKS:SUETASKS 1 ''t zo .+ ee PPESTEN TTT TOL FOROS HEUTEW ee LABOR COST SUPKARS EREDSSRNEAEE I7.02 'START TTT TESC16ACTIVATE carn: Data acqusition SERVICE:-Llectrical Desig PRETOO ENOIMG:FODUECY MEER:® Desig heveal ite:SUM PERIODS A weeds ISSUE Dall Feocedures Aaa] aa ve vrrpernn se ceenees fwaluation 1 Kecoemerstations 'BUDGET RECAE 'ACTUAL 1 RITE STaiYS,'Fen ECT LOW ' Frotveinary One-t ite Diagan ''Vee coer crocrnses sersetesentisse coal ' 1 1 J BERCEWT COMPLETION +1 1 PERTOO TU DATE Tot AOE.LABOR PERTOO TO DATE |AUR.LABOR 1 WARTAT ION |FEMAINTM,|ADCETEG |CxPeAED SC Tike |METATIO®eb TATION + 2.03 PRELINTMARD REVIEW TASKS /SURTASKS 1 ')'mei ''mt eoro8 'a rs ': P08 OE LINE OfaGeans 27.01 PROPOSAL REVIEW Develop #maleze 154 Svstee Dre-(ane THU Syston One-Late 406 Volt System Dre Line Rotor Control Center Ore-L ine SYSTEM SIMOTES: Sheet LoremSeegeProtectionGrowmdingRegeirenents FL DUT MES Coneral Pant 69.0.Control fooe 7.0.51 Eaupeent foo 27.07 TELAWIGAL SFECEP ICSI TONS Identification &Selection Equipsesd Specifications Materral Specifications Orawareg P Data Suberttals COIR SCHEMATICS PoLLeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeePROJECT STATUS REPORT LABOR AND EXPENSE SUMMARY LABOR COST SUMMARY EXPENSE SUMMARY MANHOUR SUMMARY 2 START-UP ACT EUTTIES Data dcqarisitiae Decay.dacaial Frocedses Rawal Evaluations &FeeonmendatsonsFretrernatyOne-Link Oiagtae PRELIMINARY REVIEW OME LINE OT AckanS, Develop f trcluze YY Systee Ore-Line2.00 Systen One-t ane480WolkSvatenOne-Line Motor Lantrol Center One-line 7,SYSTEN STUDIES T0301 Short Ciront T0502 Surge Fratertion 27.05.03 Gramercy kegvirenents 2704 FLW OROMTIES 7.0601 Geeral Plant 27.06.92 Contral Roos 27.06.03 Equipaent keoe, 27,07 TECAWTCAL SPECIFICATIONS 27.07.01 Eerdatication &Selection 27.07.82 Equapaent Specifications27.0709 Materval Specaf icationsTOTOADrawing&Data Suberttals CONTROL SCHEMATICS. 1 i ' ' 1 ' ' 1 i ' ' t t t ' i ' i ' t ' i ' t 4 ' } ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' q ' i i 1 i i i fl 1 i 1 i LABOR Gb CIFENSE SUMMARY CHETETECAION CUTENt:PRONCT:SEWVICE:-Thectrical Gost FEOTOS EWING:FONEL)MF: 'SEGHENT:ESF:b.Kraeer 4 vert TSE DGIE: i i]'BUDLET 1 ACTUAL 'STalys 1 FeO ECT Ne . (27 +BLETTRICAL DESIOW SERVICES 1 1 Voeceeseeeere cesses :cesses secre ' i)i FERIDG «10 DATE TOT AVE,LABOR PERIOD «=0 DATE 4 UARTATION |REMRIWING 1 FUDCETED EVPEMDED |ACTUAL 1 Gib LT]ons TALTM +C TASES /SURTASKS:'s i]1 4 *'1 'L) --:' 'i]i]t i i 1 Q?.09 PROPOSAL PEVIEW i 6 t t at o a oO)o ot o Q or 1 t 1 1 4 i i . q 1 1 1 i]i . $2.82 Suet activities \1 '.' 1 i i 4 i i 4 7.62.08 Bate Acquisition i Ly a a al 0 a HY a al Q 7 ay . 1 37.82.02 Desiar Marea)1 o 9 i ot a t o?a vi a i od 3 37602.09 Procedures Raswal i o o 5 or &4 as ®4 4 5)o : 1 37.02.08 Evaluation &Recommendations -|G &6 or o 6 oF a ot 6 iy oo ” 1 HL02.05 -Freluersary Ore-Line Diayeae |®®4 or a Q 1 o a 3 9 a ' i i i]1 i V ' C t i i i)i)1 1 2.02 PRELIM IWAkY REVIEW i i 0 %at Q G ot 4 ot 6 a el ,v t 1 i)v 1 t i]i]1 i i]' $17.08 OWE LINE DTaGkaS 'i 1 1 ': 1 i]1 'i]1 ' Vo 27.04.84 Develop i Malyze 'a a o ol a L al a oy a o ot oa1EA.02 1540 Syston One-t ine \6 °®or o 4 o1 4 Ea ®'ut on 4 27.04.03 2.80 System One.une '6 a o ol a 6 at a at a >at 1 37.08.04 480 Volt System Qne-Line 'G o 4 al 0 w Gt o or o 5 ol . B 27.04.05,Motor Control Center One-Line o 0 o o1 a o at o ol 6 Li ad ' t i]i]1 1 i)i) $t i]1 i)1 1 {27,05 SeSTEN STUDIES \4 i \\: t U f 1 \i {2705.09 Short Cireurt \°°'oe 6 °a1 o 1 6 o ot 1 27,06.82 'Sorge Protection i LJ Q o ol 4 9 al o ae Q a at 1 77.0589 Grounding Requiteeents 1 6 °°oF 6 °at °1 6 a om 0 i]'i]i]i]1 i i]'i)1 i12708PuaOkawtas'1 1 t \: i i]t 1 i]'+ 1 27.06.01 General Plant 1 °®°o1 6 °a1 °a .5 au 4 7 bb 82 Contra)Rooe i 6 0 L Of a 0 el o on o a ot 'tl 1 27.06.09 Equipaent fooe '0 o 6 O71 Q 9 al 9 wy 4 a 41 a . 'i i i 1 t ' i)4 i]i 'i 1 4 DOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS:'1 i !t 1 1 t i)1 1 1 1 1 TOL deetafication A Selection i))°or 0 o a1 o et ®'ot . 1 27.07.02 Eqvipeent Specifications i 0 0 o oF @ %ot 4 or Q i ay 'iu 1 97.87.63 Material Specifications i e o a at o q Gl o et G ig te ' 1 27.07.04 'Drawing &Data Sterttals t Q o o oF %a ot q or t 6 at 7 q '1 i)1 '' i t 1 i '1 t 1 37.08 CONTROL SCHEMATICS i I \''' hems 4 J i.at at " SOAK STATUS KEFORT SEKCENT COMPLETION GEPORT 1" CitasFOOL:semvice:Electrical Desay PERT0 ewoTNG:PROUT WEEK 0 SEM;esr:0,Krawer SUMART FERIOD:4 weeks ISSIR DATE: t 4 PERCENT (2)COMPLETE 1 1 COMPLETION OATE 1 127 -ELECTRICAL CESIEM SERVICES 1 1 REMARKS,i 4 \ 1 I t i ''1 i)'i]a i i}'TASKS "SURTASKS 1 1Ot 266 Wh Ws Wi 41 WI WT WI 1008 i}y a i I t v i i 4 I a t i t 1 37S 'DESTOH DATA 1 t i)i)'1 1 4 1 i i 4 i ' t i 1 V a t 1 i)i 1 iy 1 1 1 i Caren bool Design Data Sweaty 1 1 i]i a !t 1 1 ''i i i 4 2.48.02 Record Drawings t q i]1 1 t '1 i '1 ''' i}1 t i)i i)1 t i)t i i)'i 1 y U b i i]I i 1 27.9 CONSTEYCTTON SUPPORT to aot i t t PROJECT STATUS FEFORT 1 i 1 i)t i)i] eetes Ct Construction Modifications i 1 t t i] 1 P60?Tespection E Complinee rn PRECENT COMPLETION REPOR)ueecenotesar L463 Calsbration €fest fo oiotoetet : (27.16.08 Cheeh-Gul A Start-Up yop bo bos Gem: \ren PoKCt seevice:Electrical Design PERIOD END TAG:PROKCT MEK: ,oto obot SECAEMT:mse:0.Kroser SUMART PERIOD:4 wets TSSUE DATES 't PERCENT (2)COMPLETE L)4 COMPLETION DATE i) 1 27 -QUECTRICA DESIGN SERVICES '1 REMARKS, f i 1 t i t 'i 1 i i 'i 1 TASKS/SUR TASKS,1101 1 $1SOOT 701 BOE WI 1001 '1 't 'v i '' 1 27.08.01 Develop &Interlock !i i 1 a i i ' 1 U7 .08.07 1500 System Scheeatics i i 1 i 1 1 i a 1 27.08.09 TRY Systoe Schesatics i)'i]''t a a 1 27.08.04 4O0V Svates Scheeatics i 1 1 '''i ' 1 27.08.05,Motor Control Center Schematics 1 i]i]''''1 1 27.08.06 Precipitator Schessties 1 1 L 'i 27.06.07 Miscellaneous Schematics i]t i i 1 i}1 'i)'' i yororort PERCENT CORPLETION AEPORT177.02 LIGNIN ee PERCENT COPPLETZON REPORT 2 i i i 1 ''cure:'one Maine 1 '''PREC:sesviet:Electrical design PERIOO CWO TMG:FROUECT MEEK:@ ores pte anetboarés tooo SeoneT:ves:0.Fraser Swwaky PERIOD:#wets TSSUE DATE: ; rian 1 a -futcraten bestow seevces '©RET ou sens ,:j 17740 mn ora royoros ' 1 710.01 Toentaty €Lavout torotoeot !eetinge1seydyesevagoestaoaonot1TASKS/SURTASKS 11 DE WE WT WE GOL OD BT mI IO! 37.10.03 7.8¥Systee Diegraes i)1 '''1 t 1 1 '1 1 fi 't 1 I 'fi i1eeeaeratetanta”Ory ae ,yetout 127.PROPOSAL REVIEW Ce ee |,1 1 1 T7006 Precipitator Oragraes horeouus !i '!' 1 27.10.07 Miscellaneous Orage aes ''i t 1 ''''!''''''''4 ' 'i t t {1 +37.02 START-UP ACTIVITIES.t i ,1 1 'i 't ,'1 i a |ee renee Pred b pei Pooh02.ata dequisitioneeeeee peor rp bp pot 02 rocedures Harwal i i 1 i 1 i}a t aeeSametahtyoeead127,02,08 Evatuation CReconeendations «1 of dT UE ct :1 1 1 1 I 't '1 27.02.05 Prelreinary One-iise Oiagroe !1 1 1 i]t 1 i]i)1 i]1 i)t 1 'l 1 tl {1 i 1 1 ''t i]'1 1 ''t ' (27.12 cwouNOLNG porous 'rr 'i ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 boa PRELINIIMRY REVIEW i i}i}''i 'a 13 i t t 1 t 1 ETAZOL design &Layout torres '''pore '''root 4 :v ''i)1 '!',t ' |7-12-02 Grounding Plan 4 Detanis ttotowd 177.04 OWE LIME DIACRINS [1 1 1 'poRoheor 1 zran.o1 belay tat ee ;'' OH op a Analyze 'U tio eeneae ey FODALI!ee ane ''i)i 'aie hen oe es tortor \1 27.09.04 480 Galt System One-Line Povo opo to toporoueoro 1 t ' 1 t I 1 1 '1 27.04.05 Motor Contrel Center One-Line '''1 i 1 't 1 1 if 1 1 ' t 1 1 1 1 1 '1 i)1 '1 I i i '1 'a 1 v {Ws DeSICH Revit poroveous 'a ''0 tot ot tt 127.05 SYSTEN sTunTES poroaoe bo bot ti vt \'' ''i)i)1 i i}i 1 I 1 i Ly v ' 1 77.05.01 Short Crrcuit,'i)i)1 t i '1 i i i 'i i 1 27.05.02 'Surge Protection '1 1 4 ''i 1 i '''i)i 1 77.93.03 Grounding Requiresents i)1 i a i i)i]'''i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 i]''1 a i i I 1 1 ''1 i]i]'i 1 I 1 '1 PROJECT STATUS REPORT 117.06 PLA ORMTIRS Ce \1 ' '1 ''1 1 i]J i 1 1 !i '1 D 27.06.01 General Plant ''t 1 i i 'i 1 1 i LJ v i U 27.06.02 Control Roce 1 ''t t i 0 i a t i}i 1 tePERCENTCOMPLETIONREPORTVo27.06.03 Equipeent Rove i i)1 1 t 'a i i i i}i}'a 1 i)i 1 ',i 1 1 t 'q 1 'v ''i)i t ','1 i '1 i e 1 (77.07 TROWTCAL SPECIFICATIONS a ''1 i)1 1 +i i i 1 ''1 1 't ' 4 27.87.01 Identification £Selection i]'1 ''1 t i 1 1 i 1 v t 1 37.07.02 Equippent Specifications 1 1 1 i i 1 i]'i)1 T '1 1|T107.03 -atertal Specifications [es ee |f \\ 1 27.07.04 Growing A Data Subasitels ''i i '1 'v i)1 J ''i ''i i 1 ?t i '1,i i a q i) 1 t i 'i)L)t i '1 t i i}v + 12.CONTROL SCHEMATICS il il 1 1 il i 1 i i t u t U I Sngnees noapaaied POWER CORPORATE BACKGROUND POWER Engineers,Inc.(POWER)is an engineering consulting firm specializing in facilities engineering and associated services.POWER's growth from two engineers to a staff of over 90 in 10 years is due to the high quality of workmanship,professionalism and the ability of our staff to provide clients with outstanding services within their schedules and budgets. We have fielded a team of professionals to supply the full range of services for clients--from project conception to planning,right-of-way services,permitting,design,contract preparation,equipment procurement, construction management and project closeout. POWER's staff is composed of professional engineers,managers and support staff experienced in all phases of project development including conceptual design,Feasibility studies,detailed design,siting and permitting,startup,commissioning and performance testing.The depth and experience of our staff allow us to respond quickly to changes in schedule or projectscope,ensuring timely project completion. POWER's in-house capability enables us to provide services for any project, regardless of size or location.We have provided services to clients throughout the United States from Vermont to Alaska and Hawaii. POWER offers complete services in the following areas: Project Management Resource Utilization Analysis Permitting Land Services Generation Engineering Transmission and Distribution Engineering Substation Engineering Surveying Procurement Construction Management Construction Inspection Utility Analysis Industrial Engineering CORPORATE ORGANIZATION POWER is organized under a Board of Directors responsible for establishing firm direction and policies.The Board comprises key personnel who are principals in the firm and also share major project management and engineering responsibilities.This unique corporate structure ensures all projects are managed by individuals with top-level management abilities as well as significant involvement in corporate operations and direction. POWER clients have realized the benefits of dealing directly with project managers and engineers with the authority to make decisions and to personally resolve problems quickly. O315L 11-2] @DOL) Seasoned project managers are responsible for the overall direction of projects.Project Engineers retain responsibility for day-to-day project tracking and the allocation of resources,generally overseeing a multidisciplinary team of engineers and designers from our various service dapartments.Departmental personnel,in turn,are directed by department heads who are also lead engineers. Quality Assurance Policy and Procedures POWER was founded on the strong belief that the long-term growth and prosperity of any business is directly dependent on conscientious work habits resulting in a high-quality product.Our commitment to quality assurance remains vital today. Before projects get underway,checklists are developed to specifically define project requirements to ensure engineers and support personnel have an accurate base upon which to build their planning. As projects progress,our Quality Assurance Program is employed to maintain our high standards.POWER's Drawing and Document Checking System is directed toward compliance with the requirements of all technical,local, state and federal design,construction,safety and environmental codes. Additional requirements of the client are always considered to ensure satisfaction.Moreover,client review and approval milestones are built into project schedules to ensure clients receive the products they desire. POWER personnel recognize that systematic and conscientious document and drawing checking and control is imperative on all projects,regardless of size.All personnel adhere to document,generation,checking and filing procedures outlined in our Quality Assurance Manual. HART CROWSER CORPORATE BACKGROUND Hart Crowser,Inc.is a group of nearly 100 professional environmental scientists,geotechnical engineers,engineering geologists,hydrogeologists and support staff dedicated to providing quality,responsive consulting services.During its 12-year history,the firm has developed an experience base encompassing a full range of environmental and geotechnical disciplines and has completed more than 1,800 projects throughout Alaska and the Pacific Northwest.The firm is a registered professional corporation in the State of Alaska. With offices located in Anchorage,Alaska and Seattle and Tacoma, Washington,Hart Crowser is well-equipped to conduct site investigations in remote locations of Alaska.A special feature of the Anchorage office is a state-of-the-art testing laboratory with frozen soil testing capabilities. O315L I[-22 @DoUet Hart Crowser's staff includes a group of experienced managers and technical specialists who have been working together as a team for more than six years on planning,permitting,and design of projects in many areas of Alaska.Hart Crowser provides clients with full-service capabilities in the applied sciences and geotechnical engineering,as summarized below: °Project Permitting,EIS's and Environmental Reports *Site and Route Selection Studies e Cultural Resources Services,Including Archeology,History, Historic Preservation and Native American Concerns Water Quality and Hydrology Ecology,Limnology,and Wetland Biology Land Use Analyses Foundation Engineering and Engineering Geology Cold Regions Engineering Earthquake Engineering Tunneling and Rock Engineering Groundwater Development and Contamination Assessments Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Hart Crowser personnel have expertence in site explorations and characterization,permitting,preparation of environmenta|impact statements,and evaluation of construction and operational impacts.Their geotechnical experience in Alaska has included projects requiring special foundation designs for structures underlain by permafrost,design oftemporaryandpermanentgravelroadsunderlainbypermafrost,.andevaluationsofslopestabilityinjice-rich areas.Site investigations in remote areas have been successfully accomplished under adverse weather conditions.Hart Crowser recognizes that access,logistics,material availability,and local experience are important factors which must be considered carefully when planning site preparation and construction in Alaska environments. Hart Crowser's environmental scientists have worked together on alternate energy and route selection studies since 1980 when team members conducted a large alternate energy generation and transmission study for the U.S.Air Force MX (now Peacekeeper)Missile Project.Other energy projects have included environmental evaluations in support of route selection for the Northern Tier and Trans Mountain crude oil pipeline projects,both of which involved submarine segments and sensitive environmental issues such as impacts on marine and anadromous fisheries,wetlands,public lands, recreation,and aesthetics.In Alaska,Hart Crowser team members participated in environmental and economic aspects of a feasibility study for hydroelectric facilities at three sites near Chignik on the Alaskan peninsula. Capabilities -Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center 'AEIDC) The Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEIDC)was established in 1972 by the Alaska legislature and the University of Alaska in recognition of the need for a referral and applied research center for O315L II-23 YP DOME! Alaska resource and science information.AEIDC is located in Anchorage but functions throughout the entire state.Four complimentary service divisions comprise AEIDC: Informaton Services Resource,Science,and Cultural Services Alaska Climate Center Production and Communications Over its 15-year history,AEIDC has collected and maintained a practical information base on Alaska's environments and resources.AEIDC actively seeks published and unpublished information routinely.Their working library is one of the most comprehensive sources of environmental information in the state. To aid in conducting investigations of the type required by the solicitation,AEIDC maintains current files on research activity and in-state library accession lists.As an arm of the University of Alaska-Fairbanks,AEIDC also is privileged to be able to search the holdings of the Interlibrary Loan System.These information sources together can materially reduce search time,an important consideration in a project facing severe time constraints. AEIDC has been involved continuously with the preparation of environmental reports since its inception in 1972.AEIDC's staff has been involved (either in earlier federal office capacities or while at AEIDC)with virtually all major environmental projects in Alaska dating from the Trans-Alaska Pipeline to the OTH-B radar project of today.Included have been studies of Cook Inlet and Bristol Bay;many EIS efforts mandated by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA);several Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licensing efforts for gas pipelines and hydroelectric projects;alternate siting for the North Warning System radar project;three of the first artificial gravel islands in the Prudhoe Bay area (for Exxon and Sohto);numerous environmental reports and studies of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (and its predecessor,NPR-4); and many sociocultural and subsistence-oriented reports of Alaska Native peoples. FACILITIES -COMPUTER HARDWARE POWER is dedicated to the ongoing development of computer literacy and automation.We have confirmed that computer facilities improve efficiency and accuracy,enhance innovation and creativity,and lead to high-quality finished products.Additionally,our design staffs are trained in Computer-Assisted Drafting and Design (CADD)operation.In-house computer hardware facilities include the following: O315L [1-24 CLO) (» Apollo Computer System This network of supermini computers was designed specifically for scientific and engineering applica- tions requiring extensive computa- tional capacity and speed.Combined with a very high resolution graphics capability,the Apollo is ideally suited to CADD and engineering ap- plications.A schematic diagram of our Apollo network,produced by the Apollo in conjunction with the plot- ter described below,is included in this section. Hewlett-Packard 7580B Plotter This high-resolution drafting plot- ter has a mechanical resolution of 0.00012 in.With its eight-pen capacity,it can produce precise drawings quickly on either paper or film media up to 24 x 48 inches. IBM Micro Computers Five IBM ATs,one XT and one PC with a math co-processor are used in combination with three types of printers for spreadsheet,engineer- ing,word processing and other functions. WANG OIS 130A This dedicated word processing system with six workstations accommodates up to 4,000 pages of data at any one time.Corres- pondence,construction contracts and other documents can be produced quickly and easily tailored to specific needs. Hewlett-Packard Laserjets Two compact and fast laser printers generate documents of the highest quality.A number of type font cartridges can be plugged in for varied effects. WANG Laser Printer This large printer carries two types of paper stock--one for routine documents and another with our letterhead for formal letters. It is the workhorse of our office and produces high-quality documents very quickly. WANG Daisy-whee!l Printers Two tractor-feed,daisy-wheel print- ers are used for daily corres- pondence.Their print quality is excellent. O315L 'IT-25 NN DOWELEAQNBRSMOCOTEOT Summagraphics Microgrid This input device translates graphic Digitizer information into digital informa- tion suitable for use by the Apollo computer system and CADD software. Some applications include transfer- ring maps and drawings,equipment drawings,and one-lines and schem- atics into the computer system for modification by the operator.This digitizer has a resolution of 1,000 lines per inch,providing very accurate data transfers. Cipher Microstreamer This 1,600 BPI magnetic tape drive, which Tape Drive is part of the Apollo network,is used primarily for safely storing drawing files. In addition,it provides a vehicle for importing and exporting data out of house. AUTOCAD Drafting System This system consists of an IBM-AT with many additional features including a 19-inch,Hi-Res Mitsubishi Color Monitor driven by Graphax 20/20 graphics card containing two megabytes of graphics memory for instantaneous pan and zoom features with 1024 x 1024 resolution.A Hitachi Digitizer is used for data entry. Software includes Autocad CAD system with autoiges for conversion to other computer systems. FACILITIES -SOFTWARE PROGRAMS The computer hardware facilities mentioned in the first section are used extensively through application of the following software programs. Apollo Programs e DOGS DOGS is an acronym for Design- Oriented Graphics System.Using DOGS,CADD system operators produce precision design drawings at a high rate of speed.DOGS also performs various design calculations,mater- fals and property tracking,and item cost and part number control. All drawings and symbols created in-house are filed for immediate recall by any user. O315L II-26 DOG) °FNDA FouNDation Analysis program.This is a drilled-pier foundation analysis program that considers shear moment and bearing for design.It also considers soil characteristics at varied depths. Some additional finite element analysis software available for the Apollo System are ANSYS,NASTRAN, PND,PATRANG-G.These programs exceed the capabilities of a "STRUDL"type program because'of their ability to "Solid Model"all structural configurations. °TOPDES Transmission OPtimized DESign program.For optimizing the structural design of steel lattice towers. °SAGTEN SAG and TENsion program from Alcoa has been customized by POWER programmers and broken into three components.The first allows for rapid standard sag and tension runs and generation of sag and tension data and stringing sag tables.The second permits additional conditions to be applied during the interactive run process.And the third version is fully flexible for runs with non-standard and covered conductors such as Tri-Plex. °SAGTEMP SAG and TEMPlate generation program written in-house to produce sag templates for spotting structures. It produces hot,cold and OHGW curves as well as ground clearance curves. °CLIP Offset CLIPping program.This is Alcoa's sag correction and offset clipping program. System Analysis Programs POWER''s system studies capabilities are enhanced by an advanced set of system analysis programs available for use on both our Apollo and IBM systems.These programs include: .ADLPIPE For stress analysis of complex piping systems in accordance with the latest ANSI and ASME codes. O315L TI-27 e Dower) The piping system is modeled as a network of pipe super elements composed of straight and curved pipe,valves,reducers,ties,rigid members and beams. °FLOWNET Computes the characteristics of Steady-flow and transient fluid networks.The pressure drops and flow are computed in various branches of a complex network of pipes and fittings.FLOWNET also assigns pipe sizes and pump pres- sures to minimize the cost of pipes and pumps. °TRIFLEX Piping system design and analysis program that considers the effects of temperature,pressure,weight and seismic loading.It features automatic spring hanger design and non-linear restraint actions.It provides compliance reports for ANSI BBl codes,NEMA 23 Standard, API Standard 610 and 617. °PET LINE DESIGN,STEEL A program for complete structure configuration design and analysis for steel structures. O315L [I-28 DOUG) PoE es TEM ANAL.[ORUL PAM, PRINTRONIX MYP MATRIX PRINTER 80/200 CPS ig ' ' ' HP 75608 'PLOTTER 1 RS-232-C ' SEATAL @ 2335401950 1 1 t oot 1\26H111iAPOLLO ON300 1 0 MBYTES NODE //ST_L HEX.EBE SERIAL #641507 DISRKLESS TERMINAL WP DEVICE SUITCH 70 MBYTE DISK SERIAL @ 400024009 POWER ENGINEERS,INC. APOLLO SYSTEM NETWORK APOLLO DN300 1 0 MBYTES wooe «=//IND_1HEX.1353 SERIAL @ 641594 PARTWER 10 1867 SUMLAGAAPHICS: BIT PAG ONE SEATAL #@ $3216 RS-232-C APOLLO DNS5O 3 0 MBYTES (COLOR) APOLLOHEX70WBYTEOISKSERIAL&W/FLOPPY SERIAL # ALTERNATE RGY_MASTER PAFEC (DOGS) ELECTROCON (PSA) DRAFT DIRECTORIES PSA DIRECTORIES FORTRAN APOLLO OSPB0A-HMB:70 MBYTE O1Sk DOMAIN SEAVER PROCESSOR W/FLOPPY 5 MBYTES SEAIAL #@ 400024089 MAS TAPE CONTROLLER rrr 48 MBYTES CAPACITY 1600 OPI 100 IPS 9 TRACK APOLLO MAG TAPE DEVICE APOLLO 0N320 1 5 MBYTES NODE.//SUB_1 HEX. SERIAL @ AS-232-C 8 HP 75656 PLOTTER APOLLO 0N320 15 MBYTES wooe ¢/TOL HEX BET WASTER NODE WASTER REGISTAY SITE SERIAL @.0N320/416813 SUMMAGAAPHICS BIT PAD ONE SERIAL @ 46896 - ode ome mme PRINTROWIX M¥e WATAIX PRINTER 80/200 CPS SERIAL @ M3272 AS-232-C ais AND FEA TONYGala ae NODE //SUB_2 HER SEATAL @ COPIER PRODUCTION FACILITIES POWER has recently purchased the latest state-of-the-art copying machine - the Xerox 1090 copier.This microprocessor-controlled copier produces 92 copies per minute,and provides stacking and collating,two-sided copying, variable reduction and enlargement,21 levels of contrast control,and preprogramming of complex jobs.The 1090 gives POWER in-house capability to equal the speed and quality of a print shop duplicator. In addition,POWER has variable size comb-binders,three-ring binders,and crop machines to enhance quality report production. PROCESS CAMERA POWER has in-house a DS PHOTOACE C-260-D process camera for quality drawing reduction.POWER'S reports,graphs,charts,and drawings and specifications are always sharp and easily read when reduced for document inclusion. VIDEO CAMERA POWER has video tape equipment consisting of a a Zenith VM7000,VHS format video camera.This camera features the latest automatic recording features such as automatic focus,iris and color control.Quality video and sound reproduction allows POWER to record field trips and investigations for the 'benefit of the office personnel involved in a project but unable to participate in the field investigations. O375L TI-30 @ Door) ITI.QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE POWER has put together a solid project team with specific experience in all of the areas detailed in the Scope of Work on pages 6-8 of the Unalaska Geothermal RFP.POWER's combined experience in geothermal power systems evaluation and transmission/substation feasibility and cost analysis is unparalleled.Hart Crowser's experience in environmental analysis, hydrology,geologic studies,and support facilities siting and feasibilityinAlaskaissimilarlyunmatched.Together,POWER and Hart Crowser will provide the Power Authority with an unbeatable project team perfectly suited to fulfill the needs of this project. PROJECT TEAM EXPERIENCE The following project team resumés detail our project team's experience as it relates to the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project experience descriptions for POWER and Hart Crowser begin on page III-60. CLIENT REFERENCES Client references are located at the end of this section. O315L III-1 @D0UeL) ALBERT MUNIO POSITION:PROJECT MANAGER EDUCATION:BS,Mechanical Engineering,Western Pennsylvania Technical College,1960 Specialty Engineering courses,University of Colorado,Denver University, Boise State University and International Correspondence Schools. Business Management and Estimating seminars,Falts Institute,Ottaviano and Professional Advancement Institute EXPERIENCE:Mr.Munio has nearly 30 years of mechanical engineering experience in both the design and construction of commercial]and industrial projects. Experience includes heating ventilation and air conditioning,fire protection,plumbing,refrigeration,process piping,central boiler plants, district heating and cooling distribution systems and geothermal resource utilization.Duties performed include system sizing and layout,equipment selection,drawings and specifications preparation,estimating,purchasing, inventory and quality control,project management and_construction supervision. Representive project experience includes the following: .Ormesa Geothermal Project,California Project Manager responsible for acceptance test preparation and testing Of a 30 MW geothermal power plant in Southern California.Responsible for review and approval of test procedures and _specifications, witnessing tests for plant components,capacity and overall performance tests.A comprehensive report detailing plant workmanship,operability, performance and deficiencies with a recommendation whether to assume the Tong term debt,will be submitted to the term lenders. :Unit 16 Geothermal Steam Gathering System,California Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible for specification,design and coordination of activities for 15,000-foot cross-country steam gathering system.A unique feature of this large-diameter piping network (up to 42 inches nominal diameter)was shop-bent piping.Responsible preparing the specification,conducting the bid evaluation,conforming the specification and reviewing vendor submittals. University of Alaska Botler Plant Expansion,Alaska Lead Mechanical Engineer for a central steam boiler plant expansion, including interface to existing turbine generator equipment and central steam distribution system.Project scope also included addition of baghouse units for flue gas cleanup on two existing coal-fired boilers, and a coal unloading structure with heat recovery for car thawing. .Chena Station,Alaska Lead Engineer responsible for design and specification of HVAC,fire protection/detection,plumbing and dust suppression systems for new coal storage and processing plant at an existing power generation facility. CLUE) 0316L ALBERT MUNIO 0376L Cerrejon Coal Project,Barranquilla,Columbia Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible for sizing and specifying two oil-fired combustion turbine generator units to serve as interim and back-up power sources for major mining and shipping facilities. BHO Energy Conservation Study,Idaho Project Manager responsible for evaluating various energy conservation options available to Morrison-Knudsen at its headquarters office complex including ice making and storage,geothermal heating and cooling,fan speed control and industrial heat pumps. Kettle Falls Generating Plant,Washington Staff Engineer responsible for design,specification,bid evaluation and construction coordination of HVAC,fire protection,plumbing,plant insulation and boiler flue gas cleaning systems for a 46 MW wood-fueled power generation facility. Thule AFB -Power System Upgrade,Thule,Greenland Staff Engineer responsible for design and specification of HVAC,fire protection/detection,heat recovery and central steam distribution systems for a new six-unit diese?engine-based power generation and heat recovery boiler plant for a military base. SMUD/McClellan AFB Power Plant,California Staff Engineer responsible for design and specification of HVAC and fire protection/detection systems for combustion turbine based peaking power generation plant to serve a military base. Boston Edison Coal Conversion,Massachusetts Lead Engineer responsible for design and specification of HVAC,fire protection/detection,plumbing and combustion air systems for bid preparation on pending project. Riverview Plaza,Park Center Complex,Idaho Project Engineer responsible for design,specification and construction supervision for HVAC,fire protection and plumbing for a multi-story office building. Argonne National Laboratory -INEL,Idaho Project Engineer responsible for design,specification and construction supervision for special exhaust filtration systems handling radioactive particulate.Equipment involved proved HEPA filters bag-in/bag-out housings,and redundancy capability. DUC)SOSS WILLIAM LEWIS,P.E. POSITION:PROJECT ENGINEER/PROCESS ENGINEER EDUCATION:BS,Chemical Engineering,University of Idaho,1975 REGISTRATION Idaho EXPERI ENCE:Mr.Lewis has 10 years experience in chemical process engineering including estimating,supervision,scheduling,design,construction,start-up operations and project controls.His background includes work as a project engineer and lead discipline engineer for design firms,as well as an operations and maintenance engineer for a hydrocarbon production firm.His areas of expertise include gas,liquid and two-phase line sizing;heat transfer calculations;condensate collection and steam distribution system design;process equipment;and geothermal system design. He has been responsible for process flow diagrams,material and energy balances,piping and instrumentation diagrams,hazardous waste assessment, equipment sizing and selection,and material specification. In addition,Mr.Lewis has performed construction inspection for a cogeneration hydrocarbon process project valued at over $100 million.His varied experience includes the following: °Oxbow Geothermal Pilot Plant Scaling Test,Nevada Project Manager for an injection system scaling test for Oxbow Geothermal.Project consists of complete design,specification, purchasing and supply of a test system module consisting of a two-phase flow separator,test beds,control and sampling system.Analytical equipment is also being supplied and sampling and analytical procedures prepared for the test. .Ormesa Geothermal Project,California Project Engineer responsible for acceptance test preparation and testing of a 30 MW geothermal power plant in Southern California.Responsible for review,development and approval of test procedures and specifications prepared by the contractor,witnessing tests for individual plant components,capacity and overall performance tests.A comprehensive report detailing overall plant workmanship,operability, performance and deficiencies with a recommendation whether to assume the long term debt,will be submitted to the term lenders. °Salton Sea Steam Gathering System,California Lead Process Engineer for a 10 MW geothermal flash plant with a brine processing system.This first-of-a-kind plant emp loyed a crystallization system with seed recycle to control the scaling problems that had previously prohibited use of this geothermal resource.The plant came up to design rates within one week of the initial start-up. Responsible for process flow definition,P&IDs,equipment specification and selection,and direction of project mechanical and chemica} engineers doing process work. 0316L ezouer) WILLIAM LEWIS,P.E. 0376L Salton Sea Geothermal Project,California Project Manager and Lead Process Engineer for the conceptual design of this 49 MW power plant for Kennecott.The design of this geothermal power plant was unique in that it utilized a highly saline brine with an associated minerals recovery system.Responsible for preparing process flow diagrams,site layout,equipment sizing,capital and O&M cost estimates,and coordination of all project activities. Coso Hot Springs 25 MW Geothermal Plant,California Project Manager responsible for providing engineering review and support services on an as needed basis for this 25 MW geothermal plant. Imperial Energy 15 MW Geothermal Power Plant,California Project Manager responsible for conceptual design and capital cost estimate for a 15 MW power plant.This project also included assisting with the negotiation of a power sales agreement between the client and Southern California Edison. Geyser Unit 16 Steam Gathering System,California Lead Engineer for this 15,000-foot,cross-country steam gathering system.Responsible for coordination of all process and mechanical activities,including piping and instrumentation diagrams,vessel process design,mechanical specifications,bid evaluations,and vendor drawing review.Specific duties included pipe transient analysis,pipe sizing,heat loss calculations,and control system design.The system was the first in the Geyser's Geothermal Area in which the steam gathering system for one unit was interconnected with another unit. This allows a computerized transfer of steam in the event of a shutdown of one unit.Also,steam loss is minimized along with the associated energy waste in the event of a turbine trip.This also minimizes the quantity of geothermal steam H2S that is released into the environment. Vulcan 20 MW Power Plant,California Process Engineer associated with conceptual design and capital cost estimate for Magma Power's proposed 20 MW power plant.Detailed tasks included the development of the process flow diagram and portions of the capital cost estimate. Geothermal Permitting Program,Idaho Project Manager responsible for directing the geothermal permit program for the State of Idaho.Primary duties included permit application review,application requirements,and review of applicants'facilities for compliance. CZ0URL DALE KRAMER POSITION:ELECTRICAL ENGINEER EDUCATION:BS,Electronic Engineering Technology,Lake Superior State College,1974. Associate Degree,Computer Enginering Technology,Lake Superior State College,1974. REGISTRATION:Engineer-in-Training,Idaho EXPERI ENCE:Mr.Kramer has 14 years experience as an electrical design engineer and construction manager for generation,substation and transmission TJine projects. Career experience includes two years with the Detroit Edison Company,as a distribution substation designer;six years with Gilbert/Commonwealth,as a substation,distribution line and construction manager;one year with Spectrum Engineering as a transmission line,substation design engineer;four years with Morrison-Knudsen Company as a project engineer for generation plant design and construction management activities;and one year with POWER as a project engineer. Job experience includes all areas of project management and detailed design engineering.Project management experience includes client liaison,project cost estimating,project scheduling,manpower resource allocation,personnel supervision and project cost control.Detailed design engineering experience includes preparation of conceptual]plans and detail drawings,engineering calculations,general contract conditions,technical procurement and installation specifications,electrical systems testing and construction Management activities. Selected projects Mr.Kramer has worked on include: .Uranium Enrichment Plant 345kV¥Substation,Ohio Substation Design Engineer for the design of control,instrumentation and relay diagrams for a 345k¥,400 MVA substation and JI5kV power distribution system for a U.S.Department of Energy uranium enrichment plant in Ohio.Also oversaw in-service testing of components. .Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project,Alaska Senior Electrical Engineer in charge of the construction management of four 138kV substations and a central SCADA generation control facility. Oversaw construction of all facilities from site preparation through testing and energization.Supervised crew of quality control inspectors and handled field engineering duties. Travis 69-13.8k¥Substation,Texas Senior Design Engineer responsible for complete electrical design of this major distribution substation in downtown Beaumont,Texas.Work included maintaining substation tn an energized condition throughout modification work.The existing underground cable network was spliced into new cables from a new 16-breaker,common-aisle switchgear unit. eDouer)0317 6L DALE KRAMER 0316L Washington Water Power Generating Station Controls and Monitoring Systems Modernization Project Engineer for controls and monitoring systems modifications for five hydrogenerating facilities fn northwestern Montana,northern Idaho and northeastern Washington.Work consists of re-designing voltage regulation systems,spill gate drives and controls,temperature monitoring devices,draft chest controls,instrument air systems and HVAC systems. Seward Substation Upgrade Project,Alaska Project Engineer for the preliminary engineering phase of an existing substation and diese?generation power plant.Conducted field survey of facilities and made recommendations concerning the addition of generation equipment and substation upgrade improvement plans. Kettle Falls 46MW Wood-Fired Power Plant,Washington Senior Electrical Engineer responsible for designing the plant electrical system for this water power company plant in Kettle Falls, Washington. Responsibilities included preparing electrical drawings for at] systems.This included boiler control systems;turbine-generator control systems;wood handling conveyor systems;ash handling conveyor systems;providing central control through the use of Modicon 584 Programmable Controllers and Bailey Network 90 Coordinated Control Systems with auto/manual stations and operator interface consoles.Also prepared equipment specification for high voltage equipment including a 50 MVA main power transformer,I5k¥switchgear,5kV¥switchgear,480V motor control centers,uninterruptable power supplies,batteries and battery chargers. University of Alaska Boiler Addition,Alaska Lead Electrical Engineer for the electrical design of a 100,000 Ib/hr boiler and new full-stream baghouse.Responsible for the design and specifications for electrical and control systems necessary to contro] the boiler from a central control facility.This included utilization of a Bailey Network 90 Coordinated Control System,design of instrumentation and controls for manual?operation,lighting for conduit and cable and all other electrical system requirements. Sun Valley Lodge Remodel,Idaho Project Manager for this commercial project involving the complete electrical rehabilitation of the 50-year-old Sun Valley Lodge. Responsible for coordinating the design of new electrical systems including lighting,cable and wiring for power supply to all mechanical equipment. D0) JOHN L.CAVANAUGH,P.E. POSITION:INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS ENGINEER EDUCATION:BS,Electrical Engineering,Montana State University,1978 REGISTRATION:Idaho EXPERIENCE:Mr.Cavanaugh has seven years experience in design,construction and start-up of fossil fuel and geothermal power plants.His areas of expertise include design,installation,calibration and testing of analog,digital and pneumatic control systems.He has specifically been responsible for specification,selection and evaluation of instruments,controls,switchgear and monitoring equipment.He has also been responsible for installation and erection of plant electrical and control systems. Representative project experience includes the following: .Salton Sea Steam Gathering System,California Lead Instrumentation/Controls Engineer for this 10 MW flash plant with a brine processing system.Responsible for development of entire contro} system including specification,selection and evaluation of controls, instruments and monitoring equipment.Also responsible for installation supervision,calibration,testing and start-up of all controls and instrumentation.A scaling problem,which previously prohibited use of this highly saline resource,was solved by applying a brine processing system utilizing a seed recycle system. SMUD/McCTellan Gas Turbine 50 MW Power Plant,California Lead Electrical/Controls Engineer for this 50 MW power plant,which will serve the Sacramento Municipal Utility District and McClellan Air Force Base near Sacramento,California.Responsible for specification and evaluation of electrical control equipment;design of plant electrical distribution;construction support and pre-operational testing of switchgear,transformers and motor control centers. The electrical system includes two 43.8kV¥,4000 ampere breakers;13.8, 12.47.and 4.16kV¥switchgear;several transformers,motor control centers,gas compressor controls;generator protection controls and a GE Mark IV system. .Kettle Falls 46 MW Wood-Fired Power Plant,Washington Senior Electrical/Controls Engineer for this 46 MW wood-fired, gas-ignited unit utilizing a microprocessor-based control system with interactive graphic video terminals and programmable controllers. Responsible for material and equipment selection,erection supervision, testing and start-up of instrumentation and controls. 0316L ay>DOUel) JOHN CAVANAUGH,P.E.2 °Fair Station Balance Draft Conversion,Iowa Lead Instrumentation/Controls Engineer for this project to convert a 33 MW forced draft boiler to a balanced draft boiler.The conversion included the addition of an induced draft fan,implosion protection and draft controls.Responsible for the design of implosion protection, boiler draft controls and the specification and selection of controls to complement existing pneumatic controls. °Spurlock Unit #2 500 MW Coal Fired Unit,Kentucky Instrumentation/Controls Engineer for this 500 MW coal-fired plant. Responsible for design,testing,and start-up of the plant interlock logic system,computer input and output lists,control loop diagrams and systems interfacing. 0316L CLL) MARK FORBORD,P.E. POSITION:CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEER/COORDINATOR EDUCATION:_BS,Civil Engineering,Montana State University,1978 REGISTRATION:Idaho,Washington,Oregon EXPERIENCE:Mr.Forbord has seven years experience in the engineering of industrial and power plant projects.He is experienced in specification writing,design team coordination,civil and structural analysis and design in all areas of power plant and industrial support systems. Specifically,Mr.Forbord has engineering expertise in sitework,buildings, power plant and support facilities,structural steel and reinforced concrete structures.He has been extensively involved in the static and dynamic analysis of equipment foundations.He has a comprehensive grasp of computer-assisted design and analysis.He is also experienced in the coordination of civil,structural,mechanical and electrical engineering personnel;and in the scheduling and execution of "fast track"design and construction projects. Mr.Forbord's project experience includes the following: °Aminoil Geothermal Pipeline Systems Civil/Structural Engineer for the design of PG&E Unit #16 geothermal steam pipeline.Responsible for overland pipe support design and associated steam collection structures,Aminoil USA,Inc. ,Thule AFB,Greenland Civil/Structural Engineer for this 30 MW diesel-fueled power plant. Engineered arctic foundations,powerblock structure,and support facilities,Corps of Engineers,Thule,Greenland. °Kettle Falls,Washington Civil/Structural Engineer for this 46 MW wood-fired power plant. Responsible for design of boiler,powerblock,yard foundations and superstructures including stack,cooling tower and wood handling facilities,for The Washington Water Power Co.,Kettle Falls,Washington. .Ore-Ida Foods,Inc.,Food Processing Plant Expansion Civil/Structural Engineer responsible for plant layout planning, sitework,civil/structural specifications,and the design of foundations,precast concrete,masonry and structural steel.Also completed a feasibility study for cogeneration. .Colorado Ute Unit 3 Civil/Structural Engineer for this 450 MW coal-fired unit.Responsible for structural design of main powerblock,foundations and yard facilities,Colorado Ute Electrical Association. 0316L Doel) ( MARK FORBORD,P.E. 0316L Spurlock 2,Kentucky Civil/Structural Engineer for this 650 MW coal-fired unit.Responsible for the design of chimney,coal handling facilities and misc.structures for Kentucky Rural Electrical Association. Muscatine Civil/Structural Engineer for this 150 MW coal-fired unft.Responsible for the design of T-G foundation,boiler steel,powerblock and coal handling facilities for Muscatine Power and Water. Sacramento Municipal Utility District,California Civil/Structural Engineer for this 50 MW gas turbine power plant. Responsible for the design of gas turbine foundation and miscellaneous structures. University of Alaska Boiler Addition,Alaska Civil/Structural Engineer for the addition of a 10 MW boiler and steam turbine.The project included the addition of boiler steel superstructure at the University of Alaska,Fairbanks,Alaska. Shippingport Station,Pennsylvania Civil/Structural Engineer for this 80 MW nuclear reactor generating station decommissioning project.Responsible for determining grouting, shielding and lifting requirements of reactor and neutron shield tank. Involvement with demolition requirements and procedures,U.S.Department of Energy,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania. Vermont Yankee Reactor Recirculation Piping System Replacement,Vermont Civil/Structural Engineer for this 500 MW nuclear plant steam piping removal and replacement project.Designed new office facilities at plant including structural design for piping removal for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation. Point Beach Steam Generator Replacement,Wisconsin Civil/Structural Engineer for the replacement of two nuclear steam generators and piping.Designed temporary containment structure for contaminated steam generator storage for Westinghouse Electric Corporation at Point Beach,Wisconsin. Idaho Portland Cement Co.Project,Idaho Civil/Structural Engineer responsible for the design and sitework for Idaho Portland Cement Company.Project included cement pumping station design,manholes,valve pits,sitework and railway facilities. C@D0MeL JOHN McGREW POSITION: EDUCATION: EXPERI ENCE: 0316L LEAD TRANSMISSION ENGINEER Mechanical Engineering,San Diego State University Prior to becoming a Project Engineer,Mr.McGrew acquired valuable practical experience in the electrical engieering field as a construction supervisor and aS a transmission/distribution designer.This solid background in construction and design has proven invaluable in the performance of his present duties,which involve the day-to-day performance and facilitation of all tasks involved in utility projects,from conceptual planning through energization of facilities.Mr.McGrew's knowledge of the design and construction processes allows him to anticipate and address potential problems in those critical project areas,thus avoiding costly delays and ensuring a project's timely and successful completion.Specific project engineering responsibilities include project scheduling and cost estimating; monitoring and expediting the permitting and right-of-way acquisition processes;design coordination and final review;interfacing with the client, contractor and other involved agencies;and budget and schedule monitoring. Mr.McGrew has served as the Project Engineer for several recent POWER utility projects,including the following: Chiniak-Pasagshak 14.4/24.9kV Distribution Line,Alaska Project Engineer for all phases of design for 40 miles of 14.4/24.9kV distribution line on Kodiak Island.Supervising line routing,survey, design and construction management,including material procurement and contract administration through closeout.Design includes 3,000 feet of 24.9kV underground and several single-phase taps and services. °Grouse Creek -Wendover 138kV Transmission Project,Utah and Nevada Project Engineer for this fast-track project to design and construct 76 miles of H-frame 138kV transmission line,two 138-24.9kY substations and a 138kV¥switching station,as well as modification of an existing substation to accommodate the new power supply system.Project required fast tracking due to rapidly increasing loads projected to exceed the capacity of the existing system supplying power to the city of Wendover, Nevada by the summer of 1984.Coordinated all phases of project from preliminary line routing through energization and project closeout. Coordinated and interfaced with two owners,two BLM agencies,the BPA and REA,and various federal,state and county agencies during the permitting and licensing phase of the project.Successfully negotiated mutually acceptable agreement with BLM during Section 7 Consultation concerning the project's impact in the reintroduction of the peregrine falcon.Project was completed one month ahead of a fast-track schedule and under budget. °McLaughlin Gold Project,California Project Engineer in charge of the routing and design of 4.16kV distribution facilities consisting of several overhead aerial cable and open wire lines to serve the grinding area of a new gold mine operation @Dole) r :> JOHN McGREW 2 in northcentral California.Coordinated conductor analysis to determine most cost effective conductor and generated cost comparisons to determine feasibility of constructing temporary distribution line to the crushing area of the mine.Also performed complete cost analysis of planned 115kV transmission facilities,which addressed various ownership alternatives and made recommendations.Assisted owner in power service negotiations with PG&E regarding design and construction of new 115kV transmission line and prepared construction specifications. °Gold Fields Mining Mesquite Project,California Project Engineer responsible for the feasibility studies,line routing, detailed design and materfal specifications and procurement for a new 161-92kV¥substation and nine miles of 92kV line to serve the power needs of a gold quarry in southern California.Substation will connect to Western Area Power Administration's 161kV¥V line east of E1 Centro. Detailed design of the station includes complete microwave and SCADA communications system for control by Western.Project requires special design for 120°F ambient temperatures for both line and station due to the desert location of the mining facility.Mr.McGrew has been responsible for all project communication between Western,the Imperial Irrigation District and Gold Fields. °Hydro-Collector 46kVY Facilities,Idaho Project Engineer for the design and construction of two transmission tie lines and two 46-2.4k¥substations to tie power generated by two low-head,hydrogeneration facilities in the Snake River Canyon into Idaho Power's electric system.Responsible for all phases of project including line routing and station siting,facilities design,material procurement,construction management and client interface.Assisted client in negotiations with Idaho Power Company for a power sales agreement.Monitored project schedule and budget. °Santa Fe Coal Corporation Lee Ranch Project,New Mexico Transmission Engineer for complete electric distribution system to supply new surface coal mine in northcentral New Mexico.Coordinated overall design of 4 miles of 34.5kV pit feeder line and 1,000 feet of 34.5kV underground cable.Prepared design document and construction specifications.Performed final design review and approval of line facilities. °Wallace CUC Conversion Project Design Engineer for a complex distribution project involving conversion of the town of Wallace,Idaho from 2.4kV to 13.8kV¥.Responsibilities included coordination of studies,planning,fielding,preliminary planning,design,interaction with various agencies,preparation of the contract and specification documents and construction inspection. 03176L =@20Uet) RON SCHRODER,P.E. POSITION:LEAD STATION ENGINEER EDUCATION:BS,Engineering,US Naval Academy,1971 REGISTRATION:Professional Engineer,California,Idaho EXPERIENCE:Mr.Schroder has ten years of experience in the electric utility field.Most recently,he was the Project Engineer for a 230kV substation in Alaska, involving a 300 MVA transformer,four breakers and the associated structures, relaying and instrumentation,and interface with the SCADA system.Mr. Schroder has worked for Idaho Power Company,and is a top metering and instrumentation engineer.He has worked for Idaho Power Company,starting as a distribution engineer and moving to Division Meter Supervisor overseeing 11 metering personnel.He was responsible for the testing,installation and maintenance of electric meters.Shortly thereafter,Mr.Schroder became Meter Engineer for Idaho Power,establishing metering policies for the areas of interchange metering,testing,training and energy theft.He reorganized the metering structure of the company for better efficiency.He was also a member of task forces that selected equipment for PURPA load survey and electronic meter reading. Mr.Schroder also served as an officer in the US Navy for five years.As the Main Propulsion Assistant on a nuclear submarine,he was responsible for maintaining the nuclear reactor mechanical and support systems. Most recently,Mr.Schroder has'been involved in developing and establishing procedures to save electricity in existing buildings.He has been responsible for audits and improvements in lighting,HVAC,motors and other electrical devices. Specific experience includes the following: Beluga 138-230kV¥Station Alaska Lead Substation Engineer for this new 230kV substation connecting to an existing 138kV¥substation near Anchorage.Supervising design and station interface,construction specifications and drawings,and final inspection services.Station configuration is a five-terminal,breaker and one-half scheme with a microwave-based SCADA system.Equipment and structural elements have been designed to withstand Zone 4 (.5g)seismic forces.New station will upgrade existing system to 230kV and provide voltage transformation,metering,line protection and switching for existing and future transmission from Beluga Generating Plant to load centers in the Anchorage area. West Wells 138-24.9/14.4 Substation,Nevada Metering Engineer responsible for design and installation supervision of the station metering for this Wells Rural Electric Company substation. The metering involved both real and reactive power and included magnetic tape recorders. 0376L CLUE (- RON SCHRODER,P.E. 0317 6L Midpoint 500kV Station,Idaho Metering Engineer for this major Pacific Power &Light Substation in southern Idaho.He was responsible for the metering design,supervision of the installation,and testing and inspection of metering for the station.A kWh and kQh meter were used in conjunction with a magnetic tape recorder to determine the billing quantities.Annual testing ensured continued accuracy. Scoville 69-12.5k¥Substation,Idaho Metering Engineer for substation built to service the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL)in southern Idaho.The station is fed at 69kV via two transmission feeds,one from Idaho Power and one from Utah Power &Light.He was responsible for metering design and installation Supervision of the station.Utilized Scientific Columbus "JEM-II" meters for the station to isolate two UP&l customers from INEL metering totals.Since it was possible for INEL to generate more than the site load,these meters had to be bi-directional,also.Summing of the usages was performed by a computer using magnetic tape input. Borah 230-138kV¥Substation,Idaho Metering Engineer for an Idaho Power ring bus station designed for an interconnection with Utah Power &Light.Responsible for al?metering design and installation supervision,including final testing.Station required two sets of bi-directional meters and a digital pulse recorder to accurately measure all the possible energy flows.Station required metering accuracy,capacitive-coupled voltage transformers and current transformers on the 230k¥bus.Metering was designed with telephone communication and interfaced with SCADA. Mora 34.5-12.5kV¥Substation,Idaho Distribution Engineer for an Idaho Power Company distribution substation.Responsible for system protection analysis,fault and relay coordination study,and installation of new reclosers and sectionalizers. WYE 69-34.5 Substation and Ustick 69-34.5k¥Substation,Idaho Distribution Engineer for two Idaho Power Co.distribution substations located six miles apart.Responsible for system protection analysis, fault and relay coordination study,installation of new reclosers and sectionalizers and partial conversion of feeders to 34.5kV. Idaho Power PURPA Load Survey Metering Engineer in charge of the installation and coordination of over 800 remote metering units throughout southern Idaho.This project involved customer relations and coordination with 12 different telephone companies.The project allowed Idaho Power to monitor loads on all classes of customers from a central computer through telephone lines. @ZoUer) LARRY HENRIKSEN,P.E. POSITION:TECHNICAL ADVISOR EDUCATION:BS,Electrical Engineering,Washington State University,1975 BS,General Engineering,Idaho State University,1968 REGI STRATI ON:Professional Engineer,Washington EXPERIENCE:Mr.Henriksen has been involved in the broad range of electrical utility industry engineering activities at both the detailed design and supervisory level.His experience ranges from installation and operation of a computer-based SCADA system and telemetry through distribution,transmission and substation planning,design and construction.His responsibilities also included budgeting,specification and procurement of major electrical equipment right-of-way activities,and establishing maintenace and operations procedures. Mr.Henriksen's experience is detailed below. Cowlitz PUD,Washington Chief Engineer/Supervisor for an electrical utility company with 36,000 consumers and 600 MW at peak demand.The engineering department under Mr.Henriksen's management provided the full range of engineering activities for design and construction and support of the distribution system,transmission system and substations along with ROW activities and extension of facilities to new customers.During his 10 years with Cowlitz County PUD,Mr.Henriksen was responsible for the detail design of all of the utilities transmission lines.He was responsible for structure design incorporating hot-line maintenance features as well as safety considerations.Other work included uprating substations;system planning;budgeting for utility capital expenditures;and assisting in the development of operations and maintenance procedures.In addition, he was responsible for installation of a computer-based SCADA system which tied together all of the major transmission and substation facilities on the system. .Snohomish County PUD #1,Washington Engineer for this 153,000-customer public utility.Duties included fielding and mapping,system improvement recommendations and protective relaying applications for the utilities transmission system. Westinghouse Electric Corporation,Washington Assistant Sales Engineer for this major electrical supply firm for pulp and paper and original equipment manufacturers.Provided technical liaison between customers and factory engineering personnel,quotation and proposal preparation,price and delivery negotations,and assisted consumers in product application. 0316L Lobes) r LARRY HENRIKSEN,P.E.2 Distribution System Survey A comprehensive survey of more than of 900 miles of overhead 12.5kV distribution lines to identify those lines in need of rehabilitation; determined rehabilitation alternatives and most economic and practical alternatives;also developed a rehabilitation plan with established priorities and a proposed 10-year construction schedule. °Construction Budgeting Prepared the annual Electric Construction Budget for the utility.This budget constituted the formal statement of the district's short-term construction planning in addition to al?the budgetary capital expenses for the distribution plant,substations,transmission plant,buildings and grounds,construction equipment and data processing equipment. °Underground Distribution Construction Coordinated and supervised a program for installing an underground distribution system to replace deteriorated and maintenance-intensive overhead lines.Approximately 110 miles of mew underground 12.5kV distribution lines were installed under Mr.Henriksen's supervision. .Pole Inspection and Treatment Developed and supervised a program of ground line pole inspection and treatment for a 20,000-pole distribution plant.The program provided for inspection of every pole on a periodic,rotating basis to extend pole life and identify poles in need of replacement,while levelizing maintenance and pole replacement expenditures from year to year. °Uprating Castle Rock Substation Major distribution substation uprate and rebuild for increased capacity and improved overall system reliability.The work included rebuilding double-circuit 69kV and 115kV transmission lines,installation of a 30 MVA T15kV to 69kV autotransformer,replacement of the existing 9.3 MVA 12.47kV transformer with a 28 MVA transformer,addition of two 115kV Siemens-Allis Line Backers for bus and transformer protection,addition of underground 12.47kV substation feeders,and control panel rewiring. 03176L CLUE) PETER VAN DER MEULEN POSITION:TRANSMISSION ADVISOR EDUCATION:BS,Electrical/Mechanical Engineering,Stanford University,1971 EXPERIENCE:Mr.Van Der Meulen has over 15 years experience in the electric utility industry.As a Project Manager at POWER Engineers,he has been responsible for more than 60 utility projects throughout the Western United States ranging from distribution substations to complete EHV transmission systems. Mr.Van Der Meulen has directed and managed all facets of transmission projects,from conceptual planning through construction and energization.He has developed innovative,effective cost estimating procedures;contract documents;material takeoff,procurement and expediting systems;project scheduling techniques;and construction management programs to facilitate the efficient conduct of projects of all sizes,scope and complexity. Areas in which Mr.Van Der Meulen has particular expertise include project planning and scheduling,transmission line design and routing,project coordination and expedition,and construction management.Other electric utility experience ranges from design of numerous substations,transmission lines and overhead and underground distribution systems to field engineering responsibilities during the construction of a 1500-mile,750kVY OC transmission line across central Africa. Selected projects Mr.Van Der Meulen has provided transmission line design services for are listed below. °Cyprus-Thompson Creek Mine Power Supply Project,Idaho Project Manager for the design and construction management of the complete power supply system for a $460 million molybdenum mine project.Managed all phases,including feasibility studies,system planning,permitting,land services,final design,material procurement and handling,construction management,testing and energization,and closeout of the $28 million power supply system.System components included 96 miles of 230kV transmission line,40 miles of 69kV transmission line,six substations (including two 100 MVA stations),a 230kV switching station and a complete electric supply system within the mine site.In addition,terrain constraints dictated a long-span canyon crossing of 5,500 feet which necessitated use of modified 500kV steel lattice structures and a specially designed conductor. Timely completion of the power supply facflities required close coordination and effective interface with three separate owners,general government agencies,environmental groups and affected landowners. Sensitive socio-political environment of the project necessitated evaluation of multiple alternatives for line routing and station siting.Mountainous terrain up to 8,000 feet in elevation and winter construction imposed by time constraints posed significant engineering, scheduling and construction management challenges;however,the four-year project was completed ahead of schedule and significantly under budget. O316L CLO) la PETER VAN DER MEULEN 2 °Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL)230k¥Project,California Project Director for the preliminary engineering and land services phase of this major 230k¥transmission project in north-central California involving 70 miles of double-circuit,steel tower transmission line and two new stations.Responsible for the coordination and successful completion of various preliminary engineering and land services tasks associated with the Notice of Intent and Application for Certification phases of the project.Work is being performed for a consortium of owners in order to satisfy the licensing requirements of the California Energy Commission. .Rifle-San Juan 345kV Transmission Line,Colorado and New Mexico Project Manager for the preliminary engineering and economic analysis of portions of the proposed 275-mile Rifle-San Juan 345kV Transmission Line in mountainous western Colorado and northern New Mexico.Scope of services included 1)review of portions of the original route and their potential impacts;2)selection and impact analysis of alternative routes;and 3)preliminary economic analysis of both the original route sections and their alternatives.Permitting requirements necessitated the preliminary design and plan and profile development for 26 miles of line in order to specify tower and access road locations. °Carlin 120kV Transmission Project,Nevada Project Manager for the design and construction of 26 miles of 120kV transmission line,'two 120kV switching stations and two distribution substations.Managed and coordinated all phases of this turnkey project which was completed in June 1985,including wheeling negotiations between BPA,Sierra Pacific Power Company and Wells Rural Electric Company,the owner.Project is presently under budget and ahead of schedule. .Tincup Loop 161k¥Transmission Project,Wyoming Project Manager for all aspects of this major three-phase project to complete a transmission loop and improve service to the customers of Lower Valley Power and Light Company.Project tasks include feasibility,system planning,permitting,land services,facilities design,material procurement and construction management.New facilities consist of 48 miles of 161k¥single-circuit wood pole transmission line,32 miles of 161kV double-circuit steel pole transmission line and a new 161-24.9kV substation. Phase Two transmission facilities traversed the rugged,mountainous terrain of western Wyoming and required extensive helicopter construction.Successful negotiations with the BLM,USFS and other public agencies allowed routing of the line near a sensitive whooping crane nesting area after appropriate mitigation measures were agreed upon.Phase Three of the project is currently in the design phase and is scheduled for construction in 1986. O316L @L0UeL MEL HAYOB,P.E. POSITION: EDUCATION: TECHNICAL ADVISOR MS,Electrical Engineering,University of Missouri,1977 .BS,Electrical Engineering,University of Missouri,1963 REGISTRATION: EXPERI ENCE: 0316L Professional Engineer,Alaska,Idaho,Missouri Mr.Hayob is thoroughly experienced in the planning and design of power systems through 500kV.He has conducted and participated actively in numerous power system feasibility and planning studies.Specific responsibilities have included load flow analysis,fault studies,transient network analysis,reliability analysis to establish air clearances and contamination effects for EHV Systems,insulation coordination studies, electrical effects,optimization studies,reactive compensation and noise abatement. In addition,Mr.Hayob has several years of experience in the planning and detail design of stations through 500k¥.He has directed design teams in all aspects of station design including:sitework,structures,grounding electrical equipment,relaying and controls,metering,communications and SCADA systems. Projects illustrating Mr.Hayob's experience are listed below. .Four Corners-Ambrosia Lake-Pajarito 500kV Project,New Mexico Co-project Engineer on a $200 million project to construct a SOOkV transmission system from the Four Corners Generating Plant to the existing 230-115kV Ambrosia Lake Station near Grants,New Mexico and on to a new 500-345-115kV station near Albuquerque,New Mexico. Responsible for analyzing system configurations and developing design basis fran electrical studies.Studies were performed for load flow analysis,transient network analysis (TNA),electrical effects (corona, noise,interference,etc.),air clearance and contamination effects,and reactive compensation.Also responsible for cost estimates,schedules, determination of right of way requirements,and preparation of inputs for environmental documents. .BA-Norton 345kV Expansion Project,New Mexifco Co-project Engineer on a project to construct a 50 mile 345kV transmission line from B-A Station north of Albuquerque to Norton Station west of Santa Fe.A new 345kV terminal was added at B-A Station and a 400 MVA,345-115kV¥autotransformer with LTC was installed at Norton.Four 115k¥breakers were added at Norton to convert the 115kV ring bus to a 1 1/2 breaker scheme.Duties included development of transmission routing alternatives,environmental impacts,electrical studies,and preparation of cost estimates and schedules. erpower) a MEL HAYOB,P.E. 0376L Beluga 138-230k¥Station Alaska Project Engineer for a new 230kV substation connecting to an existing 138&V substation near Anchorage.Supervising design and station interface,construction specifications and drawings,and final inspection services.Station configuration is a five-terminal,breaker and one-half scheme with a microwave-based SCADA system.Equipment and structural elements have been designed to withstand Zone 4 (.5g)seismic forces.New station will upgrade existing system to 230kV and provide voltage transformation,metering,line protection and switching for existing and future transmission from Beluga Generating Plant to load centers in the Anchorage area. Bernalillo-Algodones (BA)345k¥Switching Station,New Mexico Project Engineer for a new $6.2 million switching station consisting of a three-breaker,345kV¥ring bus (convertible to one and one-half breaker)connected to a five-circuit,one and one-half breaker 115kV yard through a 400 MVA autotransformer with LTC.Responsible for Planning,station design,construction management and energization. Duties included preparation of cost estimates and project schedule, selection of right of way,and preparation of environmental documents. Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL)230k¥Project,California Project Engineer for preliminary engineering,layout-design and cost analysis of switching station and substation alternatives at 230kV and 500kV associated with this major transmission project in northern California.Prepared preliminary one-line and general arrangement drawings for the Geysers Switching Station,Williams Substation,and several alternative arrangements at Elverta Substation.Also prepared schedules and cost estimates for the various station alternatives analyzed in the report prepared for the joint owners of the project. Goldmine Tap -Directional Comparison Blocking System Project Design Engineer for a directional comparison blocking (DCB) protective relaying scheme utilizing a frequency-shift power line carrier channel.The DCB system was devised to prevent false tripping of a major 161kV transmission tie line which was tapped to provide a feed to a local utility for construction of a mining operation and for future growth.Responsible for planning,detail design,installation and testing. DOL) KEN LAGERGREN POSITION:TRANSMISSION ENGINEER EDUCATION:BS,Mechanical Engineering,University of Utah,1975 EXPERIENCE:Mr.Lagergren has been responsible for the structural design of wood-pole and steel-structure distribution and transmission lines ranging in voltage from 13.8 to 230k¥and in length from 4 to 96 miles.His steel design experience extends to 500kV steel towers for a long-span canyon crossing and development of several tubular steel configurations for specialized applications.In addition,he has designed several types of reinforced foundations for these structures. Mr.Lagergren performs his design calculations on computer software programs, many of which he has developed and implemented in-house.These programs encompass analysis and design of steel lattice towers,steel pole sizing, foundation sizing,wood-pole structure design,ground profile plotting, stringing sag tables and spotting of transmission line structures.Other structural/mechanical duties include design document preparation,review of in-house and fabricator structure drawings and preparation of conceptual design drawings. In addition to his design duties,Mr.Lagergren has also been involved in project coordination,field engineering and field troubleshooting,surveying, structure spotting and construction inspection on various POWER projects.As a result,he possesses a well-rounded knowledge of the electric utility engineering/construction process,which greatly enhances his design capabilities. Representative POWER projects that illustrate Mr.Lagergren's structural design experience and expertise follow. °Terror Lake -Port Lions 13.8/24.9kV Distribution Line,Alaska Structural Design Engineer for performance of design calculations and preparation of the design data document associated with 14 miles of express distribution line on Kodiak Island.High salt and fog contamination from the ocean required special design of the line using extended leakage insulators. .Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL)230kV Project,California Mechanical/Structural Design Engineer responsible for development of design criteria and methodology of design associated with the preliminary engineering phase of this major 230kV transmissfon project in northern California.High wind conditions and the location of portions of the line in a Zone 4 (.5g)seismic region necessitated developing special design criteria for the steel-lattice structures for the double-circuit transmission facility. Dry Creek -Tincup 161k¥Transmission Line,wyoming Structural Design Engineer for 32 miles of double-circuit,steel-pole 161kV transmission line routed through mountainous western Wyoming. Responsible for structural design of 16 types of single-and multiple- C LUG) 0316L KEN LAGERGREN 0316L pole structures,including complex switch structures and a modified A-frame configuration for an increased ruling span section of the line. Also prepared design data document and performed structure spotting for the line using STRSPOT,a computer program he developed. Lost River -Round Valley and Spar Canyon -South Butte 230kV Transmission Lines,Idaho Structural Design Engineer for 96 miles of 230k¥Y wood-pole transmission line routed through rugged,mountainous terrain in central Idaho. Responsible for conceptual design of structures,structure drawing review and design data document preparation.Terrain constraints and extreme weather conditions required design of braced H-frame,wood-pole structures with steel crossarms.In addition,one 5,500-foot canyon crossing on the Spar Canyon -South Butte line dictated the use of 500kV steel towers to obtain sufficient strength and conductor separation factors. Kennecott -UCD Bingham Canyon Mine Modernization Project,Utah Structural Design Engineer for new 44kV transmission spur lines supplying power to the pit area of the world's largest open-pit copper mine.Performed al]structural design calculations and prepared design data document.Reviewed structure drawings,including specially designed self-supporting steel A-frame structures developed to handle high winds and heavy ice loads. Grouse Creek -Wendover 138kV Transmission Project,Utah and Nevada Structural Design Engineer responsible for design of structures for 76 miles of 138kV braced H-frame transmission line from Grouse Creek,Utah, to Wendover,Nevada.Project responsibilities included development an in-house computer programs for complete design of wood,single-pole and crossbraced H-frame line structures,from horizontal and vertical structure strength to guying arrangements and plotting of conductor sag templates.These programs also performed electrical calculations such as insulator swing,differential ice loading and galloping analysis. Raft-Hegler 138kV Transmission Line Structural Design Engineer for 14 miles of 138kV transmission line in southern Idaho.Responsibilities included project coordination,design document preparation,structure spotting,material takeoff and structure drawing layout. Tincup-Valley 161k¥Transmissfon Line Structural Design Engineer for 40 miles of steel-pole 161kV transmission line.Responsibilities included design document preparation,structure spotting,and construction inspection.Construction took place in the winter with helicopter assistance in environmentally sensitive, mountainous terrain during extreme weather conditions. @L0eL JEFF ROSTBERG POSITION: EDUCATION: EXPERI ENCE: O316L LEAD COST ESTIMATING AND ECONOMIC ANALYST BS,Business Administration,University of North Dakota,1974 For the past six years Mr.Rostberg has performed and administered various projects for POWER,including all phases of numerous projects concerned with the planning,design,and construction of distribution and transmission lines and substations through 230kV¥.He has been responsible for managing field studies,survey and mapping tasks,environmental assessment reports, mitigating environmental concerns,right-of-way negotiations,conceptual and final system and facility design,design team coordination and interface, equipment specification,facility cost estimating,material procurement, field inspection,construction contract administration,and third-party proposal evaluation for substation and transmission lines in Idaho,Montana, Wyoming,Nevada,Utah,Washington,California,Arizona,and Alaska.He has also routed lines through rugged,mountainous terrain throughout the Northwest.he has developed and improved project network scheduling for large substation and transmission line design and construction packages; successfully obtained permits and federal agency grants;and acquired right-of-way easements. Mr.Rostberg has performed,coordinated,and administrated a multitude of utility studies including cost of service studies,rate and tariff analysis, average system cost determinations,power requirement studies,system loss analysis,and irrigation studies as well as numerous long-range and near-term planning and feasibility studies. Mr.Rostberg has considerable experience in representing both utilities and consumers in power supply,wheeling,interconnection,and facility contract negotiations as well as in utility policy development,including small power matters. For the past four years,Mr.Rostberg has administered two open-ended Title I,II,and III Western Area Power Administration A/E contracts for the Sacramento and Boulder City offices.He has extensive experience in preparation and coordination of numerous tasks and analyses for these contracts. Power Rate Analysis,Petersburg,Alaska For the City of Petersburg,Alaska,Mr.Rostberg directed the team that prepared a Power Rate Analysis consisting of a Cost-of-Service Study and Rate Design.Additionally,several policies related to rates,including Deposits and Collections,were also addressed. The City is involved in a hydro pooling arrangement and shares the output of a hydrogeneration facility,the Tyee Lake Project,with another municipality.As the output of the generation facility greatly exceeds the combined demand of the municipalities,the goal in the rate design was to provide incentives which would increase consumption through new and expanded use to make more effective use of the generation CFLy JEFF ROSTBERG | |2 and associated transmission facilities.To accomplish this goal, declining block rates were developed for each class of consumers.The City also owns base load hydro and backup/peaking diesel generation facilities,the costs of which entered into the analysis. °Instrument Testing Service,City of Petersburg,Alaska As Project Manager Mr.Rostberg performed complete testing and calibration of all relaying and metering instrumentation at the Petersburg Diesel Plant and the Blind Slough Hydro Plant for the City of Petersburg Municipal Power and Light Department.The instrumentation in these old facilities had not been tested or calibrated for fifteen years. °Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART),California For the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART),Mr.Rostberg,as Lead Analyst,performed an Alternative Power Analysis Screening Study Review investigating the technical and economic feasibility of purchasing or generating electricity to meet its transit needs.5 generation and 5 purchase alternatives (from 2 different sources)were analyzed in addition to the base case "as-is"purchase scenario.Transmission, substation,and distribution options were also reviewed.Life-cycle costs of aiternatives were addressed under the concept of Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return. .Raft River Cost of Service Study,Rate Analysis and Power Supply Project,Malta,ID As Project Manager,Mr.Rostberg headed a team that performed a multi-jurisdictional cost of service study and rate analysis for Raft River Electric Cooperative (RREC).These jurisdictions spread across three states requiring analysis of the system as a whole as well as its component parts.The study was a unique look at facility costs,cost of providing electric service,and cost-based rates for six future years, projected ten years in the future.Those six years coincided with major system improvements hypothetically implemented by RREC for providing service to:a potentially large power consumer in it's Utah jurisdiction.The cost of the systen improvements were staged to meet six staged load scenarios of the large industrial concern.RREC's existing system had to be reviewed in total.The project required interface with the industrial concern,RREC,consultants of the industrial concern,and BPA. The primary purpose of this cost of service study was to determine what the rates would be if a large load were to come onto RREC's system.The results of the study entered into power sales agreement negotiations (which POWER participated in)between the cooperative and the industrial client.In conjunction with this project,POWER performed a power supply feasibility study for the large industrial client. 0316L @ Daler)”agrees CLAY FITCH POSITION:ECONOMIC ANALYST EDUCATION:BUSINESS/ACCOUNTING,UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA,RENO EXPERIENCE:Mr.Fitch serves as an Economic Analyst at POWER.He was formerly the manager of Administrative Services for Wells Rural Electric Company responsible for average system cost analysis,power requirements studies, irrigation studies,and cost of service studies.Duties included analyzing data,projecting growth in a utility service area,and analyzing the cost of facilities that might need to be built to accommodate future load.He has in-depth experience with long range financial planning,projecting long term debt,construction budgets,operating expense budgets,and development of utility retail rates. Mr.Fitch is experienced in analyzing the allocation of a utility's rate base,and the different classes of service to determine if one class is being subsidized by another.He is thoroughly familiar with the development of rate structures of investor-owned utilities,rura?electric utilities and municipalities.He understands the process of determining power supply cost comparisions to cone up with the best deal for a power purchaser or seller. Also,he is experienced in determining the financial implications of long-range plans,two-year construction plans,power requirements studies, loss studies,feasibility studies for new equipment,and long-term debt management. Specific experience for POWER includes working as a Utility Analyst on project economic analysis and an Average System Cost Study for Wells Rural Electric Company.The project involved a preliminary study to determine which would benefit Wells the most--the Exchange Credit Transmission Agreement or the Residential Purchase and Sales Agreement.He was also responsible for an associated system loss study. While at Wells,Mr.Fitch was responsible for a major five-year cost-of-service study needed to establish equitable rental rates between service territories in two different states.The project involved researching existing rate structures,organizing cost histories,completing an inventory of facilities,identifying class rates and the possibilities of one class subsidizing another class,etc.He was also responsible for analyzing the discrepancy between the two states'rate bases and petitioning the PUC of one state to allow for a higher rate-of-return.Finally,Mr. Fitch was responsible for a study which determined the best method of equalizing these two-state rates. Mr.Fitch was also responsible for all financial forecasting for Wells Rural Electric Company.He analyzed al?Long-Range Work Plans,Two-Year Construction Work Plans,capital outlays,and building costs to determine the best way to finance any needed future facilities.He was responsible for determining methods of financing which included analysis of raising rates, debt,or customer advance. 0316L @zouer a CLAY FITCH 2 Power Rate Analysis,Petersburg,Alaska As economic analyst on this project,Mr.Fitch prepared a Power Rate Analysis consisting of a Cost-of-Service Study and Rate Design. Additionally,several policies related to rates,including Deposits and Collections,were also addressed. The City is involved in a hydro pooling arrangement and shares the output of a hydrogeneration facility,the Tyee Lake Project,with another municipality.As the output of the generation facility greatly exceeds the combined demand of the municipalities,the goal in the rate design was to provide incentives which would increase consumption through new and expanded use to make more effective use of the generation and associated transmission facilities.To accomplish this goal,declining block rates were developed for each class of consumers. The City also owns base load hydro and backup/peaking diesel generation facilities,the costs of which entered into the analysis. Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART),California For the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART),Mr.Fitch performed an Alternative Power Analysis Screening Study Review investigating the technical and economic feasibility of purchasing or generating electricity to meet its transit needs.5 generation and 5 purchase alternatives (from 2 different sources)were analyzed in addition to the base case "as-is"purchase scenario.Transmission,substation,and distribution options were also reviewed.Life-cycle costs of alternatives were addressed under the concept of Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return. Average System Cost Study,Nevada As the Utility Analyst for the preliminary comparison of two power agreements for Wells Rural Electric Company,Mr.Fitch analyzed an Exchange Credit Transmission Agreement and a Residential Purchase and Sales Agreement for this study.He was also responsible for an associated system cost study. Utility Financial Forecasting,Nevada Utility Analyst for Long-Range Work Plans,Two-Year Construction Work Plans,capital outlays,building costs,and forecasting.Determined methods of financing that included an analysis of rising rates,debt, and customer advance. Administrative Utility Services,Nevada Manager of Administrative Services for Wells Rural Electric Company. Responsibilities included system cost analysis and power requirement, irrigation,and cost of service studies.Also projected growth and developed contingency plans to upgrade facilities. 0376L @ Dole) FRANK ROWLAND POSITION:ENVIRONMENTAL/LAND SERVICES COORDINATOR EDUCATION:BS,Biology,Utah State University,1965 MEd,Environmental Education,Utah State University,1972 EXPERIENCE:Mr.Rowland is POWER's lead Land Services Manager for utility projects.Land services POWER provides under Mr.Rowland's direction include title searches, land studies (including appraisals),land use data,permitting,right-of-way and easement acquisition,fee purchase,impact and compensatory mitigation, public involvement,support fin condemnation proceedings,expert testimony at hearings,and interfacing with the U.S.Forest Service,Bureau of Land Management,U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Federal Aviation Administration, Soil Conservation Service,Army Corps of Engineers and other federal,state and local agencies. Projects Mr.Rowland has managed land services for are listed below. °Terror Lake to Port Lyons 13.8/24.9kV Distribution Line,Alaska Project Manager for environmental and land services for 14 miles of 13.8/24.9kV distribution line on Kodiak Island.Responsibile for route selection,agency interface,and economic,environmental and socio-cultural impacts. .Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL)230kV Project,California Land Services Manager for this 70-mile transmission project in northern California.Responsible for land and easement acquisition for approximately 250 landowners.Also served as Land Services Manager for the preliminary engineering/licensing phase of GPPL.Responsible for coordinating public presentations,researching and cataloging 'Jandownership,contact with landowners for rights-of-entry,and development of a computerized data base program for tracking and filing landownerships and landowner approvals and comments.Additionally responsible for responding to jands-related data requests from the California Energy Commission (licensing agency)involving the development of a vegetation management plan,construction crew fire prevention and suppression training plan and ROW access plan,as well as an analysis of construction noise.Performed as an expert witness in front of the California Energy Commission. 'City of Redding 115kV Transmission Line Project,California Land Services Manager on this 14-mile,115k¥transmission line in northcentral California.Responsibilities included routing studies, constraint mapping,impact analysis and mitigation planning,developing the Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA requirements,agency contacts and permit identification,appraisais,right-of-way acquisition,and fee purchases. 03176L CLUE) FRANK ROWLAND 2 °Arizona Interconnection 345kV Transmission Project,New Mexico Land Services Manager for 303 miles of 345kV transmission line in New Mexico.Responsibilities included survey data collection,landownership inventory,title and appraisal services management,right-of-way acquisition,state and federal grants,county permits,public involvement process and condemnation support. °Cyprus -Thompson Creek Mine Power Supply Project,Idaho Land Services Manager on this project consisting of a 96-mile,230kV line,and 40 miles of 69kV¥line,as well as several substations in mountainous,environmentally sensitive central Idaho.Responsibilities involved landownership research and cataloging,right-of-way acquisition,public involvement,routing studies,wilderness study area considerations,and fee acquisitions for substations. °Grouse Creek -Wendover 138kV Transmission Project,Utah and Nevada Land Services Manager for 76 miles of 138kV transmission line in Utah and Nevada.Responsibilities included visual impact studies, landownership inventory,state and federal permits,right-of-way acquisition,and public involvement. °Dixfe-Bishop 230kV Transmission Line,Nevada Land Services Manager for this 230-mile,230kV transmission line project in central Nevada designed to wheel power from the proposed Dixie Power Plant.Responsible for land ownership title verification,appriasals, surveying,and right-of-way acquisition. °Tincup Loop 161kV Transmission Project,Wyoming Manager of Land Services for three transmission lines and a substation in western Wyoming.Responsibilities included EA preparation,impact mitigation plan,visual contrast ratings,route studies,and securing state and federal permits. °Carlin 120kV¥Transmission Project,Nevada Land Services Manager for 26 miles of 120kV¥transmission line with two switching stations and two substations near Carlin.Responsible for:EA preparation,right-of-way aquisition,permits,visual and access impact plans,state and federal grants. .Echo Canyon-Bountiful 46kV Transmission Line,Utah Land Services Manager responsible for 27-mile,46kV transmission line in Utah's Wasatch Mountains.Responsible for easements,title and appraisal services management,condemnation support,permits,and state and federal grants. 0316L DUGCngneeshowpoaeg HART CROWSER,INC. JAMES D.GILL,P.E. Senior Associate Engineer EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION B.S.Civil Engineering,1966 Professional Civil Engineer University of Manitoba,Canada State of Alaska M.S.Geotechnical Engineering,1970 State of New York University of Manitoba,Canada British Columbia Alberta PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES American Society of Civil Engineers Canadian Geotechnical Society International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering PROFESSIONAL EXPERTENCE Mr.Gill,Alaska Manager for Hart Crowser,has over 19 years of highly diversi- fied experience in the geotechnical and civil engineering field,of which the last six years have been in Alaska.Areas of experience include:hydroelectric project work in permafrost areas,transmission line route selection and design, foundation design,offshore arctic geotechnical investigations,design of arctic foundations including piles and thermally stabilized slabs,foundation investi- gation and design,sheet pile structures,small hydro projects,isolation and clean-up of hazardous waste,development and implementation of deep drilling programs in rock,design and construction of tunnels,dam design,construction supervision,and project management.He worked 16 years with the Acres organization and was previously the Chief Civil Engineer for Power and Heavy Civil Projects for Acres International,Buffalo,New York,a visiting lecturer in Soil Mechanics at the State University of New York in Buffalo,Resident Manager for the Susitna Hydroelectric Project,and,prior to joining Hart Crowser,managed the Alaska office of the Earth Technology Corporation for two years. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Multidisciplinary Projects fe)Eklutna Water Project Lake Diversion Tunnel.Project Manager for the 8,500 foot long soft-ground water tunnel including intake and portal valve @D0MeL JAMES D.GILL,P.E. Page 2 shafts,with responsibility for shop drawing review,lining design,and coordination of subconsultants'work. 'Endicott Project.Review of five construction alternatives with the intent of developing least-cost mitigation of environmental concerns for the Standard Alaska Production Company Endicott Field Development in the Alaska Beaufort Sea done for the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers permit review under subcontract to Tryck,Nyman &Hayes.' North Warning System,U.S.Air Force.As part of the EIS conducted constructability study for five new remote radar sites which are a part of the new North Warning System.Study included assessment of transportation needs during construction and operation,as well as transportation mode, including barge,airstrips,use of helicopters,staging and fuel requirements.Also developed initial site development plans. Seward Coal Handling Facility.Acted as Project Manager for geotechnical investigation and environmental permitting work required for this 800,000 ton/year coal handling facility in Seward,Alaska. Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Served as Resident Manager for the FERC licensing phase of the Susitna Project.Responsibilities included management of all environmental,geotechnical,seismic geology,and surveying field programs,as well as directing the access and transmission line routing studies.Conducted a detailed study of reservoir slope stability and prepared portions of the FERC license Environmental Exhibit E on soils and geology. Geotechnical Engineering Projects °Foundation investigation and recommendations for the expansion of Cook Inlet Housing Authority facility in Anchorage. Geotechnical investigation for the expansion of the Pratt Museum in Homer, Alaska. Yukon Flats School District.Investigation for new structure in Fort Yukon and foundation designs at Venetie and Fort Yukon involving thermo-piles, thermo probes,and insulated backfill. Investigation and foundation recommendations for Mekoryuk School addition to be constructed on thermo-piles in marginally stable permafrost. Pt.Woronzof Wastewater Treatment Plant.Evaluation of large revetment stone performance during freeze-thaw cycles. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Company Arctic Offshore Area.Project manager for major geotechnical investigation including in-situ testing utilizing cone penetrometer,in-situ vane shear,fixed piston sampling,pressuremeter,and thermistor installation. e@pouer) JAMESD.GILL,P.E. Page 3 °Exxon Production Research.Geotechnical research program in the Bootlegger Cove Clays in Anchorage involving piezo-core calibration with laboratory testing on conventionally sampled silty clays and in-situ vane testing. e)Responsible for cone penetrometer study for the Alaska DOT/PF in the "L" Street slide area and the upper end of Turnagain Arm,Anchorage,which subsided during the 1964 earthquake,for the Alaska DGGS. °Prudhoe Bay,Alaska.Designed stabilization measures for existing slab-on-grade aircraft hangar utilizing thermo-probes. fe)Canadian Arctic Gas Pipeline.Managed all geotechnical programs for construction-related aspects including roads,railroads,and staging areas. Dams and Dikes °Twin Falls Hydro Project,Washington.Review of stability of proposed Twin Falls dam on the Snoqualmie River. °Uravan Tailing Stabilization Project,Colorado.Developed stabilization | measures for existing 160-foot-high tailings dam. °Hot Springs Tailings Dam,Arkansas.Design of the raising of the tailings dam for this major mining operation. fe)Sturgeon Pool Dam,Poughkeepsie,New York.Review and analysis of the stability of concrete gravity structure on the Walkill River. °Trenton Falls Dam,New York.Stability analysis and remedial measures for this existing gravity concrete dam. °Dan River,Virginia.Review of the condition of two gravity dams on the Dan River. °Amos Fly Ash Retention Dam,Winfield,West Virginia.Design and construc- tion specifications for this three-stage,250-foot-high earthfill dam constructed for the retention of fly ash slurry. °Big Blue River Dams,Nebraska.Reviewed the stability of two operating dams and preliminary design of cement dams at five other sites on the Big Blue River. fe)Feasibility study of a dam on the Connecticut River for Vermont Electric Cooperative at North Hartland. e)Hudson and Black Rivers Regulatory District,New York.Preliminary design and feasibility study for two dams on the Black River in New York State. °Waba Dam,Arnprior,Ontario.Design of saddle dam over deep deposits of sensitive Leda clay. CD20) JAMES D.GILL,P.E. Page 4 fe)Sirikit River Project,Thailand.Construction supervision and instrumenta- tion monitoring the 300-foot-high Sirikit Dam and Hydroelectric project. °Design of a tailings dam in the Yukon Territory,Canada. °Lower Notch Dam,Montreal River,Canada.Conducted geotechnical investiga- tions at this 200-foot-high dam with 200-foot cutoff below river level. °Red Deer River.Preliminary design for off-stream storage scheme to supply water for coal processing. e)Design of settlement ponds for Union Carbide Linde Division,Ashtabula, Ohio. fe)Assessment of slope stability of waste disposal pond for Union Carbide at Marietta,Ohio. °Design of mine runoff containment ponds at Union Carbide's Wilson Creek Pit in Hot Springs,Arkansas. oO Conducted investigation into the use of sprayed-on sealants for petroleum storage dikes. Commercial and Industrial Projects fe)Midas Muffler Shop,Old Seward Highway,Anchorage.Foundation design and :recommendations. fe)Bethlehem Steel Company,Lackwanna,New York.Designed major tied-back sheet pile retaining structures utilizing 72-foot-long sheet piles. fe)Bethlehem Steel Wastewater Treatment Facility.Foundation design including several braced excavation designs for below grade retention sumps. °New York State Electric and Gas.Responsible for the development of geologic siting criteria for fly-ash disposal sites. Power Generation and Water Resources fe)Design of cofferdams on the Okanagan River,Tonasket,Washington for construction of an irrigation project. fe)Conducted siting studies for underground pumped hydro and compressed air energy storage for Boston Edison and the Tennessee Valley Authority. °Conducted major statewide siting study for underground energy storage projects for the California Energy Commission. fe)Fort Smith to Hay River Transmission Line.Geotechnical investigation in Northwest Territories,Canada. epouer)ERESS POET - JAMES D.GILL,P.E. Page 5 °Construction supervision of Winnipeg Floodway Control Works in Manitoba. Hazardous Waste Projects [e)Developed controlled consolidation method of disposal of fly-ash over deep peat deposits,New York State Electric and Gas. Conducted investigation and developed isolated design of board waste site for Weyerheuser in North Carolina. Wrote siting and screening criteria for suitable host rock sites in the Middle Piedmont for Savannah River Laboratories for a nuclear waste repository. Developed cleanup and isolation techniques for coal tar waste site in Plattsburg,New York for New York State Electric and Gas. Tunnel and Rock Experience ce)Consultant on the construction of the access tunnel and manifold in the oil storage project in the Weeks Island salt mine,Louisiana. Design of major underground chambers for underground pumped hydro and compressed air energy storage projects for Potomac Electric Company, Washington,D.C. Consulted on 9-foot-diameter machine bored sewer interceptor tunnel, Buffalo,New York for Traylor Brothers.Included design of access shafts. Tunnel Feasibility Study,Trenton Falls Hydro Project,north of Syracuse, New York. Reviewed the suitability of Wabana mine for oil storage,Newfoundland, Canada. Reviewed design and field performance of Amos Fly-Ash retention dam, 8-foot-diameter machine bored service spillway tunnel. Special consultant on construction supervision and blast monitoring of the 600-meter-long Nilo Pecana drainage tunnel near Rio de Janiero,Brazil. Responsible for construction of both power tunnels and drainage tunnel at the Sirikit Hydroelectric Project,Thailand. Transportation Projects [e)Environmental impacts and geological assessment of various routes for the Elmendorf/Fort Richardson access to the proposed Knik Arm Crossing. Foundation investigation and design for the White Lake Road Bridge, Arnprior Hydroelectric Project,Ontario,Canada. erDoel) HART CROWSER,INC. ROSS D.RIEKE, Project Engineer EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES M.S.,Civil Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers (Geotechnical),1982 B.S.,Civil Engineering,1981 Oregon State University PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr.Riekes geotechnical experience includes a broad spectrum of engineering projects.His experience has involved application of geotechnical engineering to structure foundations,bridges,marine and port facilities,and utility pipelines.He has served as project manager and project engineer of site investigations,design studies,and construction observations for numerous geotechnical engineering projects.Mr.Rieke's particular areas of interest include pile foundations and cold regions geotechnical engineering.His academic background includes structural engineering and design and permafrost geotechnical engineering. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Port and Marine Facilities °Kake Public Dock,Kake,Alaska.Provided remedial consulting services for failure of 300 feet of bulkhead dock,and provided geotechnical recommendations for redesign and construction of bulkhead in different soil conditions requiring special design and construction considerations. °SeaLand Terminal Development,Sitcum Waterway,Port of Tacoma.Geotech- nical engineer and construction observation for 2,000 feet of concrete pile-supported deck,sheet pile wall,development of pile installation criteria,monitoring of pile,and sheet-pile wall and slope performance during construction. °Hylebos Waterway Fish Mitigation Study,Port of Tacoma.Provided para- metric slope stability analyses of submerged embankment. Pipeline and Utility Facilities fe)Cedar River Pipelines Nos.2 and 3 Relocation Project,Seattle.Provided geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of small and large diameter sanitary sewer,storm and water lines,and CDI) ROSS D.RIEKE ce) (Page 2 utilidors beneath large embankments in difficult soil conditions,under- pinning of existing bridge structures.Provided recommendations and construction observations for sheet pile retaining walls and auger-cast pile foundations. Cedar River Pipeline No.1 Relocation,Seattle.Served as geotechnical engineer during construction of 500-foot-long,18-foot-diameter,soft ground tunnel. Seattle Interstate-90 Utility Relocation Project.Provided geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of sanitary sewerandwaterpipelinesincludingpilesupportofthepipelinethrough garbage fill,storm water detention pond. Hylebos ULID 82-1 Sewer Project,Tacoma.Provided geotechnical engineer- ing for two miles of sanitary sewer,including extensive dewatering, 'stream crossings,and pipe jacking. Foundation Design and Construction University of Alaska,Fairbanks.Served as geotechnical project manager for campus soil study and developed generalized map of subsurface condi- tions across campus area.Project included use of ground penetrating radar. Calais III Building,Anchorage..Project Manager for subsurface explora- tion and design recommendations for an office building and parking garage in mid-town Anchorage.Work included consideration of high ground water, frost susceptibility,and auger cast pile foundations. Resolution Plaza,Anchorage.Geotechnical Project engineer during initial construction phase of office building in downtown Anchorage. Work included consideration of pile foundations within difficult,sensi- tive soils (L Street Slide area),and slope stability.Design recommen- dations and construction observation provided for extensive sheet-pile retaining wall system. University of Washington Consolidated Laundry Facility,Seattle.Provid- ed geotechnical services during installation of auger-cast piles through soft clay. Bellevue Square Parking Garage,Bellevue,Washington.Provided geotech- nical services during installation of high capacity drilled piers for multi-level garage. Ponderay Newsprint Mill,Usk,Washington.Geotechnical Project Manager for subsurface explorations and design recommendations for newsprint mill on 70-acre site,including water pipelines,treatment lagoons,and structure housing heavily loaded paper machines. Dobe) XL @DOUeL) Transportation Facilities fe)Tacoma Interstate-705 Freeway Project.Geotechnical project engineer for design of two miles of elevated bridge structure,high capacity shallow spread footings,deep pile foundations,large diameter drilled pier foundations requiring dewatering,earthquake and liquefaction design considerations,and permanent tie-back retaining walls. °Tacoma Interstate-705 Freeway Pile Load Test.Served as project manager for state-of-the-art pile instrumentation and testing program,including dynamic pile driving analyses,vibration monitoring and load transfer analyses. fe)Seattle Interstate-90 Thru-Connector.Geotechnical project engineer fordeeppilefoundationsandretainingwallsadjacenttosettlement- sensitive structures. fe)Seattle Interstate-90 Wall No.7.Provided geotechnical engineering for extensive slope stability analyses and retaining wall design. °Seattle Interstate-90 Seattle Access.Provided geotechnical engineering for elevated bridge structures in very difficult soil conditions,deep pile foundations,permanent tie-back retaining walls,embankment stability,special construction concerns including pile driving vibrations and settlement of existing structures,earthquake,and liquefaction considerations. o Seattle Interstate-5 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)Roadway Widening Project.Geotechnical engineer for project consisting of shallow spread footings,drilled pier foundations,auger-cast piles,and driven pile foundations,earthquake considerations,and difficult construction access concerns. PUBLICATIONS "The Role of Specific Surface Area and Related Index Properties in the Frost Heave Susceptibility of Soils",by R.D.Rieke,T.S.Vinson,and D.W.Mageau, presented at the 4th International Conference on Permafrost,Fairbanks, Alaska,July 1983. "Factors Important to the Development of Frost Heave Susceptibility Criteria for Coarse Grained Soils",by T.S.Vinson,Faheem Ahmad,and R.D.Rieke, submitted for publication in Transportation Research Board Proceedings, Washington,D.C.,January 1986. HART CROWSER,INC. STEPHEN R.ROG Project Geologist EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION B.S.Geology,1972 Professional Geologist (AIPG 6743) Long Island University State of Alaska (AA-132) Graduate Studies,1972-1975 University of Utah PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES American Institute of Professional Geologists Association of Engineering Geologists Geological Society of America Alaska Pipeline Fuilders Assoctation Alaska Mining Association Northwest Mining Assoctation PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr.Rog has over 11 years of diverse geologic and geotechnical experience on various engineering,construction,and exploration projects throughout Alaska and the Western United States.Project responsibilities have included technical management,data collection and evaluation,field logistics and subcontractor coordination,instrumentation installation and monitoring,construction inspection,and laboratory testing.Mr.Rog has worked on a variety of projects including arctic off-shore site investigations,arctic and sub-arctic foundation studies,remote site explorations,pipelines,geotechnical instrumentation,dan site investigations,mineral resource evaluations,geologic hazard assessments, tunnels,railroads,military facilities,and pulti-disciplinary environmental assessment projects.Mr.Rog has been responsible for remote field investigation projects and is also familiar with the permit and regulatory aspects for conducting these projects throughout Alaska. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Arctic Projects (Off-shore and On-shore) o Sohio Alaska Petroleum Company.Directed and coordinated helicopter and rolligon supported off=shore,off-ice drilling,sampling,in-situ testing (CPT,vane,pressuremeter),and instrumentation program for four proposed drill sites located on the Lease Sale 87,Smith Bay - Barrow Area. @D0UeL) STEPHEN R.ROG Page 2 o Lease Sale 71 (Harrison Bay)and Lease Sale 87 (Camden Bay).Field coordination,logistical support,and technical participation in Beaufort Sea off-ice drilling,sampling,and CPT programs which provided subsurface information regarding site-specific and regional soils characterization. o Sohio Mukluk Island Geotechnical Instrumentation Project,Harrison Bay. Field coordination,logistics,and technical participation for drilling,sampling,in-situ testing,and instrumentation installation and monitoring for gravel island geotechnical performance evaluation. Types of instrumentation included thermistors,pneumatic and multi-port piezometers,extensometers,and manual and in-place inclinometers. This project also included CVA soil testing for MMS permit and construction specification compliance. o Exxon-Glomar Beaufort Sea I -Concrete Island Drilling System (CIDS), Western Harrison Bay.Logistical coordination,drilling,and installation of in-place inclinometer system to monitor CIDS performance. o Mukluk Island Proximal Geotechnical Investigation,Harrison Bay.Field coordination and logistical support for drilling,sampling,and in-situ testing program in the vicinity of Mukluk Island.Fixed and hydraulic piston sampling was employed to obtain high quality,undisturbed soil samples for Sohio funded research program at MIT. o Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk,North Slope.Field management,logistical coordination,permit acquisition,and technical participation in gravel resource exploration programs in the Prudhoe Bay,Kuparuk,and Bullen Point areas.This also included an analysis of construction material, locations,and extraction methods on the North Slope as part of the Beaufort Sea Pevelopment Program and ANGTS material site permit program. (e)Shell Sandpiper/East Titan Geotechnical Investigation,Harrison Bay. Field coordination and logistical support for drilling,sampling,and in-situ testing programs for gravel island design. o ARCO Main Construction Camp -Multi-use Warehouse Exploration, Instrumentation,and Construction Investigation,Prudhoe Bay.Field coordination,logistics,and thermocouple instrumentation installation/monitoring for evaluation of thaw degradation and design of sub-grade cooling systems for 14 ARCO warehouses.Project responsibilities also included construction inspection and verification during low angle drilling for cryo-anchor installation. o Aircraft Hangar Exploration,Instrumentation,and Construction Inspection,ERA Helicopters,Prudhoe Bay.Project geologist for exploration and instrumentation system for design of subgrade cooling system,including construction inspection during thermo-probe heat pipe installation. CLO) STEPHEN R.ROG Page 3 o Wainwright Coal Study -Power Generation Project,North Slope.Project management,field coordination,permit acquisition,and logistical support for remote,heliportable core drilling program assessing potential coal mine sites,coal quality,and environmental impacts for the village of Wainwright Power Generation Project. o Helicopter Support Facility,Prudhoe Bay.Management and field coordination for foundation investigation for pile supported helicopter facility. fo)Kuparuk Industrial Center,North Slope.Field coordination and logistical support for preliminary foundation investigation for oil field base and camp facilities. Site Investigations -Alaska and Western United States o Suneel Coal Randling Facility,Seward,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for on-shore site investigation for foundation design of coal exporting facility,including drilling,sampling,field coordination,and logistics.Conducted off-shore vibra-core explorations of proposed ship berthing area and dredge fill assessment. o L Street Slide -Alaska Department of Transportation,Anchorage. Project geologist for in-situ testing program (cone penetrometer) assessing characteristics of the L Street Slide in the downtowm Anchorage area. o Resolution Plaza Building,Anchorage,Alaska.Project geologist for site-specific investigation for retaining wall design and construction monitoring during foundation pile driving. fe)Bootlegger Cove Clay Formation,DGGS,Anchorage,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for field activities,drilling,sampling,and CPT investigation characterizing the Bootlegger Cove Clay formation at various locations in the Anchorage Bowl and Turnagain Arm areas. o Bootlegger Cove Clay Formation,Anchorage,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for coordination of drilling,sampling,and in-situ testing program including CPT,Piezo-CPT,and shear vane tests combined with fixed piston undisturbed sampling of the various facies within the Bootlegger Cove Clay formation. o Yukon Flats School District -Ft.Yukon Vocational Education Residence, Alaska.Project geologist responsible for drilling,sampling, thermistor instrumentation,and field coordination for remote village foundation investigation. o Lower Kuskokwim School District -Mekoryuk High School Addition, Nunivak Island,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for drilling, sampling,thermistor installation,and field coordination for a remote village. @ DoUet) STEPHEN R.ROG Page 4 o Foundation Investigations,Anchorage,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for several foundation investigations for commercial and residential development. o Foundation Investigations,Western United States.Project geologist responsible for several foundation investigations,laboratory testing, and construction inspection for commercial,municipal,and residential projects in Seattle,Washington;Salt Lake City,Utah;and Denver, Colorado. o Walker Peak ECM Tower Investigation,Fallon,Nevada.Project geologist responsible for field coordination,logistics,drilling,core logging, geologic mapping,and site assessment. o Peacekeeper (MX)Siting Investigation,Western United States.Project geologist responsible for coordination of several exploratory drilling programs in Utah,Nevada,and New Mexico for geotechnical characterization and suitability of proposed MX Peacekeeper basing sites.Responsibilities also included shallow and intermediate depth (300 to 3,000 feet)water well logging,down hole seismic studies,well construction,and piezometer installation,permit acquisition and environmental site clearances,and rehabilitation. Pipelines o Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS)(48-inch gas),Prudhoe Bay to Yukon Territory border.Project geologist involved with theplanning,scheduling,'and execution of various phases of the center-line geotechnical exploration program for the proposed Northwest Alaska gas line. o Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS)(48-inch,o11),Prudhoe Bay to Valdez.Field geologist responsible for VSM design verification, geotechnical exploration,trench logging,and collection and evaluation of as-built geotechnical information along various segments of the TAPS system. o Trans Mountain Pipeline (42-inch,oil),Washington.Project geologist responsible for compilation and evaluation of geologic data for route selection and constructability assessments.Responsible for Skagit River crossing site investigation to assess the feasibility of a horizontally controlled,directionally drilled pipeline crossing. o Water Line Extension (8-inch,steel),Port Lions,Kodiak.Project geologist responsible for geotechnical exploration and field coordination for proposed municipal water line project. fe)Intake Cooling Pipeline (96-inch),Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant, Phoenix,Arizona.Project geologist responsible for trench excavation inspection,photo-logging,and compaction monitoring. C20) STEPHEN R.ROG Page 5 Northern Tier Pipeline Project (48-inch,ofl),Washington.Project geologist involved with geologic and hydrogeologic data compilation and evaluation for the Washington segment. Sanitary Trunk Lines Explorations,Anchorage,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for field coordination and exploration for several proposed sewer trunk line extensions within the Municipality of Anchorage. Hydroelectric Projects ce)Copper Creek Dam,North Cascades,Washington.Project geologist responsible for the field explorations for a liquefaction assessment of the proposed Copper Creek Dam site.Duties also included field coordination of downhole and shallow seismic studies. Chignik Hydroelectric project,Chignik,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for data compilation and evaluation for dam _site assessment,material source areas,and geohazard survey. Irrigation DPistrict Dam,Mountain Home,Idaho.Project geologist responsible for field coordination,drilling,sampling,test pitting, and abutment exploration for small earth embankment irrigation dam and reservoir on the Snake River Plain,Idaho. Tunnels °Eklutna Water Project -Lake Diversion Tunnel,Eklutna,Alaska. Project geologist responsible for drilling,sampling,field coordination,collection and analyses of data,and technical assistance on the geotechnical exploration program and design effort. I-90 Tunnel,Baker Ridge,Seattle,Washington.Conducted air quality testing,monitoring,and trace gas sampling for ventilation system modelling and design recommendations. Railroads [e)Van Track Subsurface Investigation,Alaska Railroad,Anchorage Yard. Project geologist responsible for drilling,sampling,and field coordination of a subsurface exploration progran. Vibration monitoring,Anchorage,Healy,Clear,Talkeetna,and Portage, Alaska Railroad.Project geologist responsible for conducting vibration monitoring at various locations along the Alaska Railroad with regards to coal and gravel unit train operations. Multi-Disciplinary Projects °USAF North Warning System,Alaska.Project geologist responsible for geotechnical data compilation and constructability assessments for proposed short-range and long-range radar sites located on the North Slope and Interior Alaska. @ DOUG)SGTOSS PETPIBRT HART CROWSER,INC. JAMES T.RYBOCK Assoctate EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Ph.D.Ecology,1978 C.E.P.(Certified Environmental University of California,Davis Professional,NAEP) M.S.Fisheries Biology,1973 Oregon State University B.A.Psychology,1967 University of Michigan PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Ecological Society of America National Association of Environmental Professionals PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Dr.Rybock has thirteen years of experience managing multidisciplinary environmental,ecological,and hazardous waste studies for government and commercial projects throughout the U.S.His responsibilities on these projects have included work plan development,cost estimating and budget tracking,supervision of field programs,subcontracting,client interface, agency interaction and public involvement,technical report preparation and review,and expert testimony.He is especially familiar with federal and state regulations,permitting requirements and agency stipulations relatedtotheprotectionofbiologicalresourcesinAlaska. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE EISs and Other Environmental Documents o Project manager for major portions of NEPA EIS for the Over-the-Horizon Backscatter radar system in Alaska.Topics investigated include land use,geology,hydrology,biology,subsistence,and cultural resources. o Project manager for site selection,scoping,and preparation of a NEPA EA and SEPA EIS for the Pierce Transit Maintenance and Operation Facility in Tacoma,Washington. °Project manager for preparation of an environmental report on the Ballistic Missile Defense Project in various western states. o Project manager for NEPA EIS for the Air Force's North Warning System project in Alaska.The project involved evaluation of alternative sites in remote areas,site specific surveys in both winter and summer ezoler) JAMES T.RYBOCK Page 2 seasons,evaluation of subsistence impacts,calculation of radar power densities and effects,and other technical studies. o Biological discipline leader for three SEPA EIS's on _proposeddevelopmentsinwesternWashington,a business park near Issaquah and two residential developments in Auburn. Port and Pipeline Projects °Project manager for a multi-volume site certification application to the State of Washington for the Northern Tier west-to-east crude oil port,tank farm,and pipeline project.This major effort involved alternative route selection and technical studies in fisheries, wetlands,Native American issues,oil spill effects and contingency |planning,marine transportation,recreation,energy,and seismic stability. o Project manager for permitting and regulatory analysis for a bulk liquids export terminal on Puget Sound. o Project manager for a 6-volume site certification application to the State of Washington for Trans Mountain Pipeline Company's proposed oil terminal,submarine pipelines,onshore storage facilities,and 149 miles of overland pipeline.Alternative overland and submarine routes were evaluated. Coal and Coke Transportation o Project director for preparation of a NEPA Environmental Assessment for the Alaska Railroad's lease of a terminal site at Seward and the rail transportation of coal to that site from the Usibelli Mine at Healy. o Project manager for air quality,transportation,noise,and permitting studies for the Port of Anacortes,Washington petroleum coke export facility. o Project manager for site selection studies,regulatory review and technical evaluations (rail transportation and vibration impacts)for the Bellcoal Coal Export Terminal,a project proposed for the Cherry Point,Washington area by the Port of Bellingham,Burlington-Northern, and ARCO. fe)Project manager for environmental studies in support of a multi- commodity bulk export facility at Cherry Point,Washington.The project,under consideration by ARCO and the Port of Bellingham,was designed to handle calcined coke,coal,salt,and other commodities. o Project manager for air quality and environmental permitting of ARCO's calcined coke export facility at the Port of Longview,Washington. CLUE JAMES T.RYBOCK Page 3 Limnological Studies ° e] Resource Planning Studies ce] Hazardous Materials and Wastes ° Assessed nutrient loading and water quality standards in Lake Mead, Nevada. Assessed environmental effects of air pump dredging of sediments in Gibralter Lake,California. Evaluated historical lake levels in Lake Tahoe,California-Nevada. Evaluated alternative means of eutrophication control in Lake Stafford, California. Evaluated sewage problems and lake eutrophication in.Lake George,New York. Tested chemical controls for algae blooms in Diamond Lake,Oregon. Project manager for the Anchorage Wetlands Study,which involved the identification and classification of wetlands and the preparation of policies to control future developments in and adjacent to these areas. Project manager for the Yukon-Kuskokwim coastal management program resource study,which involved the identification and mapping of geological,hydrological,biological,cultural and other resources within the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta of Alaska. Project manager for a variety of hazardous waste studies for a major chemical corporation in Tacoma,Washington.These studies included groundwater and effluent sampling and analysis,evaluation of remedial action alternatives,preparation of various plans (Solid Waste Plan, SPCC Plan,Contingency Plan,and Training Program),and a RCRA compliance audit. Project manager for preparation of a RCRA Part B application for a solvent and oil refinery and recycling operation in the vicinity of Commencement Bay,Washington.Provided special services in applying to EPA for a research,development,and demonstration permit. Wrote the environmental effects and regulatory compliance section of a generic underground storage tank response plan prepared for the Edison Electric Institute. CLM HART-CROWSER &ASSOCIATES,INC. GAIL THOMPSON Environmental/Cultural Resources Specialist EDUCATION ; PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Ph.D.Anthropology,1978 Society of Professional University of Washington Archeologists M.A.,Anthropology,1971 -Accreditation,1979 University of Washington Documented emphases include B.A.,Anthropology,1969 Cultural Resources Management, University of Washington Fieldwork,Archival Research, Collections Research,Teaching PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Dr.Gail Thompson has seven years experience managing and preparing multidisciplinary environmenal studies for major government and industrial projects in the western states and Alaska.Her responsibilities have included planning work scopes,assembling team members,estimating and tracking budgets and schedules,and interacting with clients,agency personnel,and the public.Dr.Thompson is familiar with a broad range of federal and state regulatory requirements for environmental studies and has applied them to a wide variety of industrial,defense,mining,commercial, _and residential developments in Alaska and the western states. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Military Projects fs)Served as assistant project manager for NEPA environmental impact assessment for the Air Force Over-the-Horizon Backscatter Radar System in Alaska.Coordinated activities of multidisciplinary project team, interacted with client and other contractors,tracked budgets and schedules,and reviewed reports for project involving site selection studies in the upper Copper River and Tanana River Valleys. fe)Supervised selected studies for preparation of a NEPA EIS in support of the U.S.Air Force North Warning System which consists of proposed changes to DEW Line stations and construction of additional radar Stations on the North Slope and interior Alaska.Work involved background research,consultations with agency personnel and Native groups,field surveys,subsistence interviews,and report preparation. fe)Supervised multidisciplinary studies for preparation of an environmental evaluation of several areas proposed for deployment of the U.S.Army Ballistic Missile Defense system.Work included research on existing conditions,project impacts,and potential mitigation measures in parts of Wyoming,Nevada,and New Mexico. ezouer) Gail Thompson Page 2 Supervised and conducted biological and cultural resources clearance surveys for numerous geotechnical and other test activity programs associated with Peacekeeper (MX)Missile Program studies in Nevada, Utah,Wyoming,and New Mexico.Work involved background research, consultations with several state and federal agencies,numerous field surveys of proposed test activity areas,and report preparation. Missile System initial operating components,including missile shelters,transportation networks,and operations base test facilities, in Nevada and Utah.Work involved developing study procedures in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management and several federal and state resource agencies,background research,field surveys,data compilation and analysis,evaluation of impacts and _potential mitigation measures,and report preparation. Planning Studies [e)Supervised archival research project to provide the Alaska Department of Natural Resources with documentation of travel,trade,and commerce for the Koyukuk River hydrological region located in northcentral Alaska.Produced as an information base to assist in presentation of state claims to lands beneath navigable waters,work included bibliographic compilation,archival research in repositories throughout the United States,computerized data processing,and preparation of a final report summarizing regional historic development with a focus on waterbody use and outlining specific data gathered on each waterbody. Supervised cultural resources study undertaken of coastal areas in the rural Yukon-Kuskokwim delta of western Alaska as part of a coastal zone management program.Work included literature and records research, consultations with federal and state agencies,and production of report sections including an overlay map showing the locations of important cultural resources sites and sensitivity areas. Supervised and conducted cultural resources work associated with development of the Coastal Management Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the North Slope Borough,Alaska.Work included background literature and records research,on-site visits to consult a variety of agencies, organizations,and individuals about traditional land use and cultural resources sites,and preparation of several reports. Industrial/Commercial Facilities [e)Supervised cultural resources assessment for proposed petroleum development at Bullen Point and along the Kuparuk River on Alaska's North Slope.Work included literature and records'research, consultations with federal and state agencies,subsistence interviews with Inupiat Eskimos,on-site survey,and report preparation identifying project impacts and recommending mitigation measures, Served as assistant project manager for the preparation of three environmental assessments for proposed Office of Nuclear Waste eae) Gail Thompson Page 3 Isolation disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in salt dome sites located in Mississippi and Louisiana.Provided liaison among client and several contractors,coordinated multidisciplinary studies,and supervised review and production of several draft documents under an extremely constrained schedule. fe)Supervised cultural resources work for Downtown Seattle Transit Project, involving a bus tunnel running under some 20 blocks of the city,and five access stations.Work involved study of historical records and geotechnical borehole data to locate areas where archeological deposits may be present and detailed archival research to define the nature and locations of past prehistoric and historic activities and structures. Port and Pipeline Projects )Supervised multidisciplinary work on Puget Sound area for site certification application to the State of Washington for the Northern Tier west-to-east crude oil port,tank farm,and pipeline project. Work involved numerous environmental concerns for impacts on wetlands, fisheries,socioeconomic,and cultural resources.Corridor ran from Port Angeles around Puget Sound and across the state. °Supervised and conducted cultural resources work for certification application to the State of Washington for the Trans Mountain Company's proposed oil terminal,submarine pipelines,onshore storage facilities, and 149 miles of overland pipeline running from the Port Angeles area across Puget Sound and to the Canadian border.Work involved documenting more than 50 sites,consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer to develop a Memorandum of Agreement for treating important resources,and report preparation. Mining 9)Conducted cultural resources assessment and completed permit application for a test boring program at a proposed 10,000 tons-per-year coal mine near Wainwright,Alaska.Work included consultations with Alaska anthropologists and Bureau of Land Management personnel regarding significance of traditional land use sites. fe)Supervised cultural resources assessment of mine access road andassociatedfacilities,including tidewater staging area,barge unloading area,and quarries for the proposed Quartz Hill Molybdenum Mine near Ketchikan,Alaska.Work involved reviewing background data,consulting with agencies and Native groups,conducting survey under Forest Service- approved research design,analysis,and report preparation. Hydroelectric/Nuclear Power fe)Supervised and conducted cultural resources program for Cowlitz Falls Hydroelectric Project in southwestern Washington.Work involved extensive survey,test excavations and determinations of National Register eligibility at two archeological sites,analysis of @2oUel) Gail Thompson Page 4 prehistoric and historic archeological materials,and preparation of a mitigation plan in consultation with Cowlitz Indian Tribe,State Historic Preservation Officer,Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. fe)Supervised cultural resources work for Skagit-Hanford Nuclear Power Project near Richland,WA.Work involved program and research design, survey and architectural documentation,test excavations,analysis of prehistoric and historic artifacts,and report preparation.Materials prepared included determinations of eligibility,impact assessment, potential mitigation measures,and testimony. o Participated in cultural resources program management for Susitna Hydroelectric Project involving development of two reservoirs and numerous supporting facilities in a remote section of southcentral Alaska.Work involved program design,subcontractor management,and consultation with federal and state agencies and Native American groups. fe)Supervised cultural resources work for West Creek Hydroelectric project near Skagway,Alaska.Work involved background research,consultations with federal and state agencies and Native American groups,field survey and test excavations,resource evaluation,impact assessment, and report preparation. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS "The Status of Urban Archeology in Seattle".Paper presented in Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Symposium on Urban Archeology,Society of American Archeology,New Orleans,Louisiana. "Modeling the Potential for Archeological Resources for the METRO Downtown Seattle Transit Project.”Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Northwest Anthropological Conference,Ellensburg,Washington,1985.Co- author with Robert M.Weaver. "Radiocarbon Age Corrections for Marine Shell Dates with Application to Northern Puget Sound-Southern Gulf of Georgia Prehistory."Syesis 14:45- 57,1981.Co-author with S.W.Robinson. "Prehistoric Settlement Changes in the Southern Northwest Coast:A Functional Approach."University of Washington Department of Anthropology Reports in Archeology.No.5,Seattle,1978. Prehistoric Archeological Resources of the Maryland Coastal Zone:A Management Overview.Maryland Department of Natural Resources,Annapolis, 1978.Co-author with Steve Wilke. G/15/85 @D0Met) HART CROWSER,INC. PHILIP C.THOMAS Land Use Planner EDUCATION M.S.Candidate -Planning,1985 University of Montana,Missoula B.S.Industrial Technology,1977 Northern Michigan University,Marquette PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr.Thomas has six years of experience managing and conducting land use studies for a variety of projects in the western states and Alaska.He has been responsible for the collection and analysis of regional constraint and opportunity data,site evaluation,data collection and mapping,impact assessment,and report preparation.Mr.Thomas'experience includes project management,budgeting,supervising field studies,data management and design,and input of data for computerized decision-making assessment models. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE °Conducted land use and recreation studies for the Air Force's North Warning Radar System project in Alaska.Study involves evaluation of alternate sites and assessment of impact to existing and future land use and recreational activities. o Assistant Project Manager for Great Falls-to-Conrad transmission line siting project and environmental impact statement for Western Area Power Administration.Involved in all aspects of the study including coordination of resource study team personnel,agency contact program, public involvement program and management of data for the nine resource studies. °Assistant Project Manager and Land Use Study Coordinator for transmission line siting project for Western Area Power Administration. Responsible for management of 13 resource studies,budgeting, supervising subcontractors,public involvement program,and report preparation and production of Draft Environmental Impact Statement. o Assistant Project Manager for addendum to the APS/SPGS&E Interconnection Project Environmental Study in Western Arizona.Involved in data collection and management as well as report production and testimony, preparation for Certificate of Environmental Compatibility. fe)Land Use Coordinator and Data Manager for urban transmission line siting study in Arizona for Salt River Project.Responsible for all Dobe) PHILIP C.THOMAS Page 2 aspects of the land use study including development of a computerizedmodelofhumansensitivitytotransmissionlines. o Land Use Analyst and Data Manager for evaluation of potential power'plant sites in Arizona for Salt River Project.Study involved assessment of constraint data for entire state and determination and evaluation of seven candidate sites and associated transmission corridors.Involved in data collection,assessment and report preparation for land use and visual studies as well as encoding,input and manipulation of data for multi-disciplinary decision-making assessment methods. °Conducted urban land use and visual studies for Power Operations Building siting study in Tempe and Scottsdale,Arizona.Performed data collection,assessment and report preparation for both visual and land use elements of this study.Also responsible for data management for all resource areas. fe)Team member in environmental study for New Mexico Generating Station Out-of-State Transmission System for Public Service New Mexico.Study involved the collection and analysis of regional land use constraint and opportunity data in a five-state study area comprising approximately 100 million acres. PUBLICATIONS ."Land Use Intensity Mapping",Co-author,Department of Geography, University of Montana,Missoula,1979. NHC/7/86 ezouer) WILSON,William J.,Supervisor,Resource Science and Cultural Services Divi- sion;Assistant Professor of Fisheries Expertise Mr.Wilson's principal expertise is in quantification of fishery and aquatic habitat responses to hydroelectric development,placer mining,coal extrac- tion,logging,and development using techniques of hydraulic and aquatic habitat modeling and instream flow assessment.He is experienced in leader- ship and supervision of multidisciplinary scientific staff in environmental assessment,problem identification and scoping,budgeting,personnel manage- ment,proposal and grant writing,and contract compliance.His major educa- tional and postgraduate efforts have been in marine and estuarine fishery science,with a focus on marine pollution problems affecting coastal fish and shellfish resources.Mr.Wilson's Alaskan experience since 1974 has been concentrated in marine and freshwater fishery biology,aquatic habitat,impact assessment,oceanography,limnology,and instream flow assessment.He possesses technical expertise in field sampling of aquatic habitats and organisms and in laboratory analysis of water,substrate,and organism sam- ples;bioassay of toxic substances;and laboratory rearing of test organisms. He is a certified SCUBA diver and an experienced photographer. Education Gonzaga University,Spokane,Washington,B.S.,biology,1969. Oregon State University,Corvallis,M.S.,fisheries and wildlife,1973. Professional Experience Supervisor,Resource Science and Cultural Services Division,and Assistant Professor of Fisheries,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.1980 to present. Senior Research Analyst in Fisheries,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.1978-1980. Collaborator,U.S.National Park Service,Alaska Area Office,Anchorage,AK. 1979.. Research Analyst in Fisheries and Wildlife Biology,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.1975-1978. Research Assistant in Biology,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.1974-1975. Independent Consultant,Water Quality Biologist for Daniel,Mann,Johnson, Mendenhall/Hilton,Portland,OR.1974. General Science Instructor,Lincoln County School District,Newport,OR. 1974, ©D0) WILSON,William J.) Page 2 Aquatic Biologist and Research Assistant,Pesticide Toxicity to Dungeness Crab and Thermal Tolerance of Estuarine Organisms Studies,Marine Science Center, Oregon State University,Newport,OR.1973-1974. Environmental Protection Agency Trainee:in Water Quality,Marine/Estuarine Suspended Sediment Study,Marine Science Center,Oregon State University, Newport,OR.1970-1973. Fisheries Laboratory Assistant,Freshwater Stream Productivity Studies,Oak Creek Fisheries Research Laboratory,Oregon State University,Corvallis,OR. 1970. Professional Memberships American Fisheries Society (Certified Fisheries Scientist;President, Alaska Chapter,1986) American Institute of Fishery Research Biologists Pacific Fishery Biologists Western Society of Naturalists Selected Publications and Reports Shepherd,B.G.,G.F.Hartman,and W.J.Wilson.1986.Relationships between stream and intragravel temperatures in coastal drainages,and some implications for fisheries workers.Paper submitted to Can.J.Fish.Aq. Sei. Wilson,W.J.1985.The Tokyo Central Wholesale Market.Poster paper presented at 12th annual meeting,Alaska Chapter,American Fisheries Society,November 18-22,Kodiak,AK. Wilson,W.J.,M.D.Kelly,and P.R.Meyer.1985.Instream temperature model- ing and fishery impact assessment for the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Regulated Streams.Edmonton,Alberta.In press. Wilson,W.J.1985.Modeling the effects of streamflow change on pink and chum salmon habitat.Paper provided to scientists in Japan,People's Republic of China,and South Korea.People to People Fishery Research Delegation,May-June.. Wilson,W.J.and M.D.Kelly.1984.Instream temperature modeling and fishery impact assessment for the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Paper presented at llth Annual Meeting,Alaska Chapter,American Fisheries Society,November 12-15,Juneau,AK. Meyer,P.R.,M.D.Kelly,K.A.Voos,and W.J.Wilson.1984.Assessment of the effects of the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project on instream temper- ature and fishery resources in the Watana to Talkeetna reach.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture,Anchorage.Document No.2330. 2 vols. L e?DOME)Ces Hi WILSON,William J.» Page 3 Wilson,W.J.1984.Application of the instream flow incremental methodology to a potential hydropower development on Kodiak Island,Alaska.Paper presented at 46th Annual Conference,Pacific Fishery Biologists, March 19-21,Ocean Shores,Washington. Alaska,University,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center.1983. Methodological approach to quantitative impact assessment for the pro- posed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.71 pp. .1983.Susitna Hydroelectric Project aquatic impact assessment: effects of project-related changes in temperature,turbidity,and stream discharge on Upper Susitna salmon resources during June through Septem- ber.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture,Anchorage.86 pp. «1983.Examination of Susitna River discharge and temperature changes due to the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Report for Harza- Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture,Anchorage.30 pp. -1983.Streamflow and temperature modeling in the Susitna basin, Alaska.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture,Anchorage. 60 pp. Wilson,W.J.1983.Pink and chum salmon spawning,egg incubation,and out-migration from two streams on Kodiak Island,Alaska.Proceedings of the 1983 Northeast Pacific Pink and Chum Salmon Workshop,January 24-26, Rosario Resort,Eastsound,WA.Pp.25-35. Prewitt,C.G.,and W.J.Wilson.1983.Application of instream flow study ,methodologies in arctic environments.Presented at Joint Northern Canada-Alaska Environmental Technical Information Exchange Workshop,.- November 7-9,Girdwood,AK. Thiele,J.,M.Kelly,and W.J.Wilson.1982.Fisheries studies for the environmental assessment of the proposed Grant Lake Hydroelectric Proj- ect.Presented at 9th Annual Meeting,Alaska Chapter,American Fisheries Society,November 15-18,Sitka,AK. Trudgen,D.E.,et al.1982.Summary of environmental knowledge of the proposed Grant Lake Hydroelectric Project area.Final Report. Report for Ebasco Services,Inc.150 pp. Wilson,W.J.1982.An interagency streamflow recommendation analysis for a proposed Alaskan hydroelectric project.Pages 241-250 in Proceedings of a symposium on the acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inven- tory information.Western Division,American Fisheries Society.Octo- ber 28-30,1981,Portland,OR.376 pp. Wilson,W.J.,et al.1982.Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project fisheries mitiga- tion plan.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,UniversityofAlaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for Alaska Power Authority.19 pp. e?Dower)Ergrers PeopoaBy (-WILSON,William J. Page 4 Wilson,W.J.,J.C.LaBelle,and M.D.Kelly.1981.An investigation of the feasibility of constructing a spawning channel at the Tyee Lake Hydro- electric Project.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for the Alaska Power Author- ity.32 pp. Wilson,W.J.,et al.1981.An assessment of environmental effects of con- struction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facil- ity,Kodiak Island,Alaska.Instream flow studies.Final report. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska, Anchorage,AK.Report for Kodiak Electric Association.419 pp. Alaska,University,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center.1980. An assessment of environmental effects of construction and operation of the proposed Tyee Lake Hydroelectric Project,Petersburg and Wrangell, Alaska.Report for Robert W.Retherford Associates.231 pp. Evans,C.D.,et al.1980.Environmental review of summer construction of "gravel islands:Sag Delta No.7 and No.8 in Stefansson Sound,Alaska. .Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for Sohio Petroleum Company.167 pp. Wilson,W.J.1980.iInstream flow and fishery research associated with the proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project,Kodiak Island.Paper pre- sented at 7th Annual Meeting,Alaska Chapter,American Fisheries Society. November 18-21,Girdwood,AK. Wilson,W.J.,et al.1980.Environmental studies of the proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project,Kodiak Island,Alaska:Instream flow studies. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska, Anchorage,AK.Report for Kodiak Electric Association.197 pp.- Wilson,W.J.,et al.1980.Environmental studies of the proposed Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project,Kodiak Island,Alaska:Raptor studies/intragravel water temperature studies.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for Kodiak Electric Association.57 pp. Evans,C.D.,W.J.Wilson,and S.V.Cuccarese.1979.The endangered whales of northern Alaska--a review of their habitats and potential conflicts with human activity.Pages 15-63 in Investigation of the occurrence and behavior pattern of whales in the vicinity of the Beaufort Sea lease area.Report for the U.S.Bureau of Land Management,Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Office,Anchorage.753 pp. Wilson,W.J.1979.Evaluation of information and ecological modeling of the Naknek River aquatic system,Katmai National Monument,Alaska.6th Annual Science and Resource Management Conference,Pacific Northwest Region,U.S.National Park Service.April 17-19,Corvallis,OR.25 pp. L @DoUel -eWILSON,William J. Page 5 Wilson,W.J.,et al.1979.An assessment of environmental effects of con- struction and operation of the proposed Terror Lake hydroelectric facil- ity,Kodiak Island,Alaska.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for Kodiak Electric Association.334 pp. Buck,E.H.,et al.1978.Bibliography,synthesis,and modelingof Naknek River aquatic system information.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for U.S. National Park Service.244 pp.' Evans,C.D.,et al.1978.An assessment of environmental effects of con- struction,operation,and abandonment of a man-made gravel island;Niakuk Well No.3 in Stefansson Sound,Alaska.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for Sohio Petroleum Company.78 pp. Wilson,W.J.,and E.H.Buck.1978.Status report on salmonid culture in Alaska.Fisheries.3(5):10-19. Wilson,W.J.1977.Red tides.Part 1.Alaska.43(5):23,60. .1977.Red tides and paralytic shellfish poisoning.Conclusion. Alaska.43(6):32-33. -(41977.Winter water availability and use conflicts as related to fish and wildlife in arctic Alaska.Paper presented at 3rd Annual Meeting, Alaska Chapter,American Fisheries Society,February 22-24,Cordova,AK. 12 pp. Wilson,W.J.,and E.H.Buck.1977.Anchorage sport fishing guide.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchor- age,AK.Map/brochure. Wilson,W.J.,and E.H.Buck.1977.The comprehensive resource inventory as a4 Management tool-a case study inventorying the anadromous fish resources of nine proposed national wildlife refuges.Paper presented at 27th Alaska Science Conference.August 4-7,1976.Fairbanks,AK.(Abstract) 2 pp. Wilson,W.J.,et al.1977.Winter water availability and use conflicts as related to fish and wildlife in arctic Alaska,a synthesis of informa- tion.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.Report for Office of Biological Services,U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service.244 pp. Buck,E.H.,et al.1975.Kadyak:a background for living.Arctic Environ- mental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK. 326 pp. Wilson,W.J.1974.Effects of concentration and particle size of suspended materials on growth and condition of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas).M.S.thesis.Oregon State University,Corvallis,OR.65 pp. ELQBS IPOSDOWEL _) WILSON,William J. Page 6 Additional Projects 1985.Delegate.People to People Citizens Ambassador Program Fishery Research Delegation to Japan,People's Republic of China,and South Korea, May 24-June 14. 1984.Session Chairman.Susitna River Hydroelectric Studies.llth Annual meeting,American Fisheries Society,Alaska Chapter. 1983."How can we assess flow for fish attraction,upstream passage,spawning, egg incubation,fry emergence,juvenile rearing,and downstream migration?" Panelist.45th Annual Pacific Fishery Biologists Conference,March 21-23,The Dalles,Oregon. 1982-present.Aquatic System Simulation Modeling and Impact Assessment of the Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Principal Investigator.Study for Acres American,Inc.and Harza/Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture,involving computer simulation modeling of reservoir and downriver physical and biological sys- tems. 1982.Preliminary Summary of Environmental Knowledge of the Bethel Area Power Plan Feasibility Assessment Project.Co-Principal Investigator.Report for Harza Engineering Company,Chicago. 1980.Evaluation of Information on Vessel Superstructure Icing Potential in Alaskan Marine Waters.Participant.Report for Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory,Seattle,WA. 1980-1982.Anchorage Fish &Game Advisory Committee,Member.Advised state Boards of Fisheries and Game on sport,commercial,and subsistence harvest regulations. 1980.General Review of Environmental Considerations of the Proposed Beluga Coal Mining and Methanol Extraction Facilities.Co-project Leader.Report for Dowl Engineers,Municipality of Anchorage,and Cook Inlet Region, Inc./Placer Amex,Inc. 1980-1983.Susitna Hydroelectric Project Steering Committee.Member.Inter- agency group to coordinate and review programs and information relating to studies of the Susitna Hydro Project.Alaska Power Authority. 1979.Whale Background Study and Report Production.Coauthor.Assembled available information,synthesized knowledge,and prepared a comprehensive report on bowhead,black right,and gray whale habitat in the Bering,Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas.Report for Naval Arctic Research Laboratory,Barrow,AK. 1977.Evaluation of Physical and Biological Constraints on Siting of Proposed Marine Ports to Serve Mineral and Fishery Industries in the Outer Continental Shelf Region of Western Alaska.Project Leader.Prepared for Alaska Offshore Marine Services,Inc.,Seattle,WA. ODOUEL MEYER,Paul R.,Hydrologist Expertise Mr.Meyer is experienced in developing and applying analytical techniques in the water resources and civil engineering fields.Most of this work involves computer applications.His specific modeling experience includes finite difference and finite element groundwater flow and transport models,watershed models,river hydraulic and thermal models,snow-and ice-melt models,and glacial flow models.His present interests focus on the hydrologic and thermal issues of cold regions. Education Dartmouth College,Hanover,New Hampshire,B.A.,mathematics,1977. University of New Hampshire,Durham,Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources,M.S.,hydrology,1980. Colorado State University,Fort Collins.Course:Groundwater Optimization, 1981. Professional Experience Instructor,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.1984 to present. Adjunct Instructor in Mathematics,Anchorage Community College,Anchorage,AK. Fall semester,1984.Taught one course in Intermediate Algebra. Science Technician III in Hydrology,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,University of Alaska,Anchorage,AK.1982 to 1984., Engineer,Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories,Richland,WA.1980-1982. Researcher in Groundwater Modeling,Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources,UNH,Durham,NH.1979. Professional Memberships American Water Resources Association,Alaska Chapter Sigma Xi Scientific Society,Associate Member Publications and Reports Wilson,W.J.,M.D.Kelly,and P.R.Meyer.Instream temperature modeling and fish impact assessment for a proposed large-scale Alaska hydroelectric project.Advances in Regulated Stream Ecology.In Press. Meyer,P.R.1985.Glacial melt routing for the Manual Calibration Program. Final Report for National Weather Service Hydrologic Research Laboratory. Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center,Anchorage,AK. @ Douer MEYER,Paul R. Page 2 Alaska,University,Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center.1984. Assessment of the effects of the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project -on instream temperature and fishery resources in the Watana to Talkeetna 'reach.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.2 vol. Marshal,P.S.,P.R.Meyer and K.A.Voos.1984.Glacier melt model concept for the National Weather Service River Forecast Laboratory,Anchorage, AK.Final report for National Weather Service Hydrologic Research 'Center.Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center.Anchorage, AK. -1983.Examination of discharge and temperature changes due to the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Final report.Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydro Aquatic Studies,Anchorage,AK.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.30 pp. .1983.Stream flow and temperature modeling in the Susitna Basin, Alaska.Final report.Alaska Power Authority.Susitna Hydro Aquatic Studies,Anchorage,AK.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture. .60 pp. -1983.Methodological approach to quantitative impact assessment for the proposed Susitna Hydroelectric Project.Report for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture.71 pp. Nelson,R.W.,et al.1983.Model evaluation of seepage from uranium tailings disposal above and below the water table.Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory,Richland,WA.1 vol. Gupta,S.K.,et al.1982.A multi-dimensional finite element code for the analysis of coupled fluid,energy,and solute transport (CFEST).Bat- telle Pacific Northwest Laboratory,Richland,WA.Report for U.S. Department of Energy. Meyer,P.R.,S.K.Gupta,and C.R.Cole.1981.UNSAT3D:A three-dimensional finite element code for simulating variably saturated groundwater flow. Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory,Richland,WA. Additional Projects 1982-present.Aquatic Impact Assessment of the Susitna Hydroelectric Project. Study for Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture involving hydrologic and thermal computer modeling of the proposed two-dam hydroelectric project. 1983-1985.Glacial melt model development for the National Weather Service River Forecast Center,Anchorage.The existing snow melt procedures used for river flood forecasting were examined and modified to better predict glacial outflow. 1984-present.Development and operation of a computer software package for determining the response of fish habitat under alternative flow regimes for the proposed Susitna hydrologic project. e@DOUel URS ENGINEERS BETH A.QUINLAN EDUCATION fe)M.S.,Oceanography,University of Washington,Seattle,WA°B.S.,Applied Physics,Adelphi University,Garden City,New York PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE °Managed the oceanographic studies for the Metro-Renton Effluent Transfer System Project.Responsibilities also included development and coordination of field study programs,data analysis and interpretation,and report preparation. fe)Managed a NOAA study involving the application of information on Puget Sound ecosystems to pollution related issues.Developed a sedimentation model for use in predictingchemicaldistributionsandbiologicaleffectsforvarious pollution increase/abatement scenarios. .e)Performed a sedimentation study on Chester-Morse Lake,a reservoir,to determine if changes in operating procedures would cause turbidity problems.Sediment erosion during anticipated normal and storm conditions were predicted. °Analyzed existing:data on circulation and sedimentation inPugetSoundaspartofasummaryofknowledgestudy sponsored by NOAA, oO Developed sections of the Trans-Mountain Oil Pipeline EIS describing fate and transport of oil and potential impact areas in Puget Sound. fe)Managed the water quality monitoring studies for the Lake Fenwick Restoration project.Tasks included data collection, analysis,interpretation,report preparation and project management. fe)Managed the circulation and water quality studies conducted for the Des Moines Sewer District to assist them in preparinga301(H)waiver.Work involved field work,data analysis, reporting and coordination with WDOE and EPA, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS fo)American Geophysical Union (AGU)fe)Marine Technology Societyfe)Pacific Estuarine Research Society @Z0bet O315L POWER Engineers,Inc. Hart Crowser,Inc. **PROJECT EXPERIENCE ** III-60 D0) PROJECT:COSO HOT SPRINGS 25MW GEOTHERMAL PLANT AND 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE CLIENT:Calpine Corporation Atkinson/Mitsibushi 2001 Gateway Place Joint Venture (CAMJV) Suite 650W P.O.Box 939 San Jose,CA 95110 Ridge Crest,CA 93555 (408)280-5811 (619)764-2286 Attention:Laurie Knox Attention:Robert Wunderlich COMPLETION:Ongoing COST:$2,200,000 Project $120,000 Fee Under two separate contracts,POWER is providing engineering services for the Coso Hot Springs 25MW Geothermal Plant and a 115kV transmission line which transports power from the plant. Under the first contract for Calpine,Corp.,POWER is providing engineering review and support services on an ongoing basis for this 25MW plant, currently in the construction phase. Under the second contract for AMJV,POWER is currently designing 28.5 miles of 115kV transmission line running from the plant to a Southern California Edison substation.The line is routed across lava beds and a sensitive archaeological area causing POWER personnel to propose special design criteria for the line and its structures. PROJECT:GEOTHERMAL PILOT PLANT SCALING TEST CLIENT:Oxbow Geothermal Company Suite 450 200 S.Virginia St. Reno,NV 89501 Attention:Mr.Doug Powell COMPLETION:Ongoing;Estimated Completion Date September 15,1986 COST:$30,000 POWER has been contracted by Oxbow Geothermal Company to conduct an injection system scaling test in central Nevada.The project consists of complete design,specification,purchasing and supply of a test system module consisting of a two-phase flow separator,test beds,controls,and sampling system.POWER jis specifying and procuring the analytical equipment and is preparing sampling and analytical prcedures for the test, to be held in August 1986. The test is necessary to determine the potential for silica scale problems in the plant injection piping and injection wells. O315L ITI-61 epomer) PROJECT:GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM SUPPORT SERVICES CLIENT:Oxbow Geothermal Company Suite 450 200 S.Virginia St. Reno,NV 89501 Attention:Mr.Doug Powel] COMPLETION:Ongoing COST:$6,000 POWER is providing engineering review and support services on an as-requested basis for Oxbow Geothermal.Work to date has included (1)evaluation of a two-phase flow gathering system versus a single-phase flow gathering and (2) determination of flow reaction forces and support design for a well flow test assembly to be used on a two-phase flowing well producing 1.0 -1.5 million pounds per hour. PROJECT:ORMESA GEOTHERMAL PROJECT CLIENT:John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. John Hancock Place P.O.Box 11] Boston,MA 02117 (617)421-3542 Attention:Mr.Herbert Magid Teachers Insurance &Annuity Assoc. 730 Third Ave. New York,NY 10017 (212)916-4308 Attention:Mr.Loren Archibald COMPLETION:Ongoing COST:$70,000,000 Project $80,000 Fee POWER is currently providing engineering review services for John HancockMutualLifeInsuranceCo.and Teachers Insurance &Annuity Assoc.,the long term lenders for a 30MWN geothermal plant project in southern California. POWER is responsible for acceptance test preparation and testing to ensure that the plant will meet the design performance requirements thus assuring theinsurancecompaniesthattheycananticipatetheprojectedreturnontheir investments.. POWER is reviewing,approving,and revising test procedures and specificationspreparedbythecontractor,conducting tests of the individual plantcomponents,and conducting capacity and overall performance tests. O315L III-62 erDower) PROJECT:SODA LAKE COST ESTIMATE AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION CLIENT:Emma Wagner P.O.Box 2648 Rancho Palos Verdes,CA 90274 (213)377-8910 COMPLETION:Ongoing COST:$2,000 For a private individual client in California,POWER will develop an operating and maintenance cost estimate and potential energy sales projection for a 1OMW double-flash geothermal plant,potentially to be located in Churchill County, Nevada. The O&M estimate will address labor requirements and costs,maintenance parts, utilities,supplies and miscellaneous expenses.Potential power customers will be contacted to determine probable power sales rates.An overall report summarizing project findings will be provided. PROJECT:SALTON SEA 49MW GEOTHERMAL PROJECT,CALIFORNIA CLIENT:Kennecott Minerals Corporation Salt Lake City,UT COMPLETION:1985 COST:$70,000 POWER Geothermal Project Team personnel performed a detailed conceptual design and capital cost estimate for this generating plant located in the Salton Sea KGRA which utilized high temperature,high salinity geothermal brine as the heat source for a 50 MW double-flash plant.The conceptual design report included a general arrangement plan,gathering system routing,site layout, equipment sizing,capital and O&M cost estimates,and the preparation of a process flow diagram with a detailed material and energy balance. O315L IIl-63 @ Doel) PROJECT:PG&E UNIT 16 STEAM GATHERING SYSTEM,GEYSERS,CALIFORNIA CLIENT:Geysers Geothermal Co. Santa Rosa,CA COMPLETION:April 1985 COST:$800 ,000 For this 15,000-foot,cross-country steam gathering system,POWER personnelprovideddesignservicesincludingallcivil/structural and mechanical planandprofiledrawingsandsupportdesigns.Mechanical activities alsoincludedpipestressanalysisanddesign,P&IDs,vessel process design,specifications,bid evaluations and vendor drawing review.The system wasthefirstintheGeysersGeothermalAreainwhichthesteamgatheringsystemforoneunitwasinterconnectedwithanotherunitutilizinganautomatedcrossover.This allowed a computerized transfer of steam in the event of a shutdown of one unit,thus minimizing the steam loss,associated energy waste,and amount of H.,S released to the environment in the event of a turbine trip. Project duration was from February 1984 to April 1985.The engineeringserviceswereperformedconcurrentlywithafast-track constructionschedule,and the project was completed on time and under budget. PROJECT:IMPERIAL ENERGY 15MW GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT,CALIFORNIA CLIENT:Imperial Energy Westlake Village,CA COMPLETION:1984 COST:$20,000 POWER Geothermal personnel were responsible for the conceptual design andcapitalcostestimateforthis15MWfacilityalsousinghighlysalinebrines.The project also included assisting with the negotiation of apowersalesagreementbetweentheclientandSouthernCaliforniaEdison. O31SL ;TI1-64 eZee) PROJECT:VULCAN 20MW POWER PLANT,CALIFORNIA CLIENT:Magma Power Company Los Angeles,CA COMPLETION:1980 COST:$50,000 POWER personnel provided conceptual design and capital cost estimate services for Magma Power's proposed 20MW single-flash power plant. Detailed tasks included the development of the process flow diagram,major equipment specifications and assessments and a capital cost estimate. PROJECT:SALTON SEA STEAM GATHERING SYSTEM CLIENT:Union Oil Company Indio,California COMPLETION:1982 COST:$1,500,000 This 1OMW double-flash geothermal plant,located in California's Imperial Valley,utilizes a crystallization system with seed recycle in a first-of-a-kind geothermal brine processing system.The seed recycle system resolved the extreme scaling problems that had previously prohibited use of this high-energy,highly saline geothermal resource. POWER employees were responsible for process flow definition,P&IDs and equipment specification and selection.The development of the complete control system including specification,selection and evaluation of controls,instruments and monitoring equipment.Instrumentation and control system construction and start-up work,installation supervision, calibration and testing,were also performed by POWER personnel. 0315L TIT-65 e power) PROJECT:POWER RATE ANALYSIS CLIENT:City of Petersburg Petersburg,Alaska COMPLETION:July 1986 COST:$20,000 For the City of Petersburg,Alaska,POWER prepared a Power Rate Analysis consisting of a Cost-of-Service Study and Rate Design.Additionally, several policies related to rates,including Deposits and Collections,were also addressed. The City is involved in a hydro pooling arrangement and shares the output of a hydro-generation facility,the Tyee Lake Project,with another municipality.As the output of the generation facility greatly exceeds the combined demand of the municipalities,the goal in the rate design was to provide incentives which would increase consumption through new =andexpandedusetomakemoreeffectiveuseofthegenerationandassociated transmission facilities.To accomplish this goal,declining block rates were developed for each class of consumers.The City also owns baseload hydro and back-up/peaking diesel generation facilities,the costs of which entered into the analysis. PROJECT:ALTERNATIVE POWER ANALYSIS SCREENING STUDY REVIEW CLIENT:Bay Area Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Street P.O.Box 12688 Oakland,CA 94604 (415)464-6000 Attention:Rudy Crespo COMPLETION:August 1986 COST:$10,000 For the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART),POWER performed anAlternativePowerAnalysisScreeningStudyReviewinvestigatingthe technical and economic feasibility of purchasing or generating electricity to meet its transit needs.5 generation and 5 purchase (from 2 different sources)alternatives were analyzed in addition to the base case "as-is" purchase scenario.Transmission,substation,and distribution options werealsoreviewed.Life-cycle costs of alternatives were addressed under the concept of Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return.The sensitivityofalternativestovariancesinselectedlife-cycle costs was also reviewed. O315L II1-66 C20) PROJECT:CHINIAK-PASAGSHAK 14.4/24.9 KV DISTRIBUTION LINE CLIENT:Kodiak Electric Association Box 787 Kodiak,AK 99615 Attention:Mr.Ed Kozak COMPLETION:Ongoing COST:$4,000,000 Kodiak Electric Association has retained POWER Engineers,Inc.to perform design and construction management services for a 44-mile 14.4/24.9 kV distribution line project on Kodiak Island. The purpose of the project is to bring new service to the remote areas of Cape Chiniak and Narrow Cape as well as to provide more reliable service to present consumers. The project is currently under construction and is scheduled for completion September,1986.POWER provided line routing,design,material procurement and contractor selection services over the course of the last year and is presently providing construction management services. Kodiak Island's remoteness,climate and topography presented interesting challenges for POWER's design team.High winds and winter icing conditions in the project area required NESC "Heavy"loading criteria to be applied to structure design.REA structures were designed for raptor safety by lowering the crossarm on a standard REA base structure to increase conductor separation.Polymer insulators were specified due to a history of vandalism in the project area,as well as to reduce flashover potential from SALT-LADEN air contamination.- In addition to the design of the 44 miles "back bone"line,POWER is responsible for the design of the single phase taps,step up transformer bank three phase underground and both overhead and underground secondaries and services.; Due to the topography of the Island,the contractor elected to frame thestructuresinyardsandhelicoptertransportthestructuresto_thestructuresite.The specially equipped track vehicles then excavated and set the structures.This method of construction has worked quite well for this project. This complex project is being completed on time and under budget. O315L III-67 _@-pouet PROJECT:SALMON RIVER COST OF SERVICE STUDY AND RATE ANALYSIS CLIENT:Salmon River Electric Cooperative P.O.Box 384 Salmon,ID 83226 Contact:Mr.Clayton Hurless COMPLETION:January 1984 COST:$10,000 Performed cost of service study and rate analysis for Salmon River Electric Cooperative (SREC)including load and loss studies,an irrigation study, and an ASC (Average System Cost)determination.Responsible for review of SREC's historical records,both plant and expenses,as well as future documents to develop data for a proforma test year.SREC's system was being impacted by a large industrial load which would increase their system demand by five times requiring new transmission facilities to serve the load.POWER estimated costs for these new facilities as well as other facilities put in service for Salmon River to serve then existing load. Also,reviewed power requirements for existing and future loads to develop base data for study.Funds for plant investment during the study test year came from three sources:SREC,the industrial concern,and the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA),thus complicating the costing analysis and requiring some costs in the study to be functionalized as contributions in aid to construction. The study was done for three reasons:first,to develop base data for the SREC's rates for electric service;second,to develop specific costs relative to the Power Sales Agreement between the cooperative and the large industrial client;and third,to complete base data for the ASC determination for SREC's Exchange Transmission Credit Agreement with BPA. An ASC was needed to determine the average cost of the utility to provide power to its consuming classes on a per KWH basis.The methodology for theASCrequiredthatlossesbedeterminedforthedistributionsystemintotalaswellasbyeachconsumingclassforinvoicinganddeterminingaveragesystemcost.Additionally,POWER personnel attended public hearings of thelocalregulatorybody,as well as other public hearings. 0315L III-68 CO LUWEEGNOSNCODURET PROJECT:ENERGY AUDIT AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEM EVALUATION OWNER:Westmoreland Coal Company Virginia Operations Big Stone Gap,VA 24219-0196 Attention:Jack Ramsey COMPLETION:February 1985 (Phase [) COST:$9,000 POWER was contracted by Westmoreland Coal Company to complete an energy audit and electrical system evaluation of Westmoreland's underground coal mine near Big Stone Gap,Virginia.POWER is developing major system improvements that will result in immediate cost savings to Westmoreland through a reduction in their bill from Old Dominion Power Company. The project is being implemented in four phases,with each phase of the contract being implemented at the discretion of Westmoreland: °Phase I -Field Investigation and Identification of Cost Savings Opportunities. °Phase II -Feasibility Study and Conceptual Design. °Phase III -Detailed Design. e Phase IV -Construction. In January 1985,POWER completed the on-site investigation of the facilities,including inspection of six substations,34.5kV transmission lines,and 7.2kV and 4.16kV mine distribution feeders.POWER also inspected the mine electrical system,which included a detailed review of: cable types,couplers,mine load centers and splices; storage area yard and electric repair shop facilities; SCR drives affecting the power factor;and capacitors in the mine load centers. 03154 III-69 @20UeL) PROJECT:PRIBILOF ISLAND SWITCHGEAR FOR ENGINE AND GENERATOR CONTROL OWNER:NOAA,NMFS,Pribilof Island Program Pribilof Islands,Alaska Department of Commerce 7600 Sandpoint Way N.E.Bin C15700 Seattle,WA 98115 Attention:Dick Fraser COMPLETION:October 1984 COST:$160,000 POWER personnel designed and supervised installation of new switchgear to automatically control a generation facility providing power to the Pribilof Islands through eight diesel generators ranging in size from 175KW to 350KW.The demand for power by the islands varies during the day,and more generators than necessary were kept on line to prevent power failures. Voltage and frequency stability,as well as load sharing,were functions provided.Installation of the switchgear had to be completed in three hours due to time constraints imposed by the owner. A load-shedding system was designed to keep on-line only the power necessary to serve immediate sytem loads.Generators are now automatically started and stopped to meet the demand.A predetermined selection is used to cycle the different generators on and off so that all generators are used periodically.In the event of a partial power failure,load is shed to prevent complete power failure.If complete failure does occur,the load is isolated,one generator is started for station power,and an alarm is sent to the operator automatically by telephone. Specific POWER responsibilities with respect to this project included system design,equipment selection and procurement,start-up,operator training and preparation of operating and maintenance manuals. 0315L III-70 enor) PROJECT:OFFSHORE PRODUCTION PLATFORMS ELECTRICAL STUDY I OWNER:Mobil Research and Development Corp. c/o Stan Burns and Associates,Inc. 5300 Hollister,Suite 230 Houston,TX 77040 Attention:Stan Burns COMPLETION:October 198] COST:$180,000 In conjunction with Stan Burns and Associates,POWER was responsible for a study to examine the existing electrical generation and distribution systems on several North Sea drilling platforms.Platforms with production rates of 100,000 barrels per day (B/D),110,000 B/D,180,000 B/D,and 300,000 B/D were examined.The purpose of the studies was to establish design parameters for future platforms via analysis of existing installations.The following studies were performed: °Established optimum voltage levels for power generation, distribution and utilization as related to the full spectrum of loads. °Optimized the utilization of electrical drive versusturbinedriveasrelatedtoinstalledgeneration capacity and weight space requirements. *Investigated the use of breakers utilized close to the generator bus as related to ability to interrupt the OC component of current. °Determined equipment weight impact on systems utilizing 60 Hz generation versus 50 Hz generation. °Investigated the use of vaporization and cast resin transformers as an alternative to liquid filled. Each of the above studies was completed using computer analysis methods and by evaluating the equipment of various manufacturers.Models weredevelopedontheprogramsformanydifferentvoltageand_loadcables--results were tabulated and graphed for a graphic picture of cable performance. Cost and performance data were calculated and compared for each of the scenarios.Recommendations were made in each area.The studies were based on a "real world"accumulation of manufacturers'equipment specifications, and guided by analyses of existing platforms. O315L III-71 @2olet PROJECT:OFFSHORE PRODUCTION PLATFORMS ELECTRICAL STUDY II OWNER:Mobil Research &Development Corporation c/o Stan Burns and Associates,Inc. 5300 Hollister,Suite 230 Houston,TX 77040 Attention:Stan Burns COMPLETION:November 1982 COST:$175,000 In conjunction with Stan Burns and Associates,Inc.,POWER was responsible for an offshore electrical study conducted prior to drilling at the Mobil O11 platform site. The studies staff at POWER analyzed the limitations of submarine cable for transmission of power to off-shore oil drilling platforms.For various types of cable,the POWER study analyzed: Cable construction and anchoring Voltage level,length and source variation Cable flammability and toxicity Corrosion control guidelines Cable mechanical performance at connections to moving structures (such as SPMs) °Reliability .Grounding and bonding recommendations Each cable type was analyzed using computer models.The results were tabulated and graphed to provide a picture of cable performance.The results of actual user experience with cable anchoring and connection to moving structures was discussed,and recommendations were developed based on users'experience. The study outlined conclusions and recommendations for Cable Anchoring Methods; Cable Types; Maximum Distances to Offshore Platforms; Type of Mooring for Cables (for SPMs);and Operational Recommendations. 0315L III-72 CLO) TERROR LAKE-PORT LIONS 24.9KV LINE KODIAK ISLAND,ALASKA CLIENT Alaska Power Authority (APA) CLIENT'S NEED Obtain a more economical power supply to replace ex- isting diesel generation serving the community of Port Lions on Kodiak Island,Alaska. DESIGN SERVICES Route Selection @ Plan-Profile Preparation Structure Selection @ Material Specifications Structure Design @ Structure List Conductor Selection @ Design Manual Preparation Structure Spotting @ Construction Drawings DESIGN FEATURES @ Contamination mitigation @ Raptor protection m Oil circuit recloser bypass structure m NESC "Heavy”loading PROJECT DESCRIPTION POWER Engineers designed 14 miles of 14.4/24.9kV ex- press distribution line from the Terror Lake Hydroelec- tric Powerhouse site to the town of Port Lions on Kodiak Island.Unreliable and expensive diesel-generated power at Port Lions prompted the Alaska Power Authority to ay BRAG NesAy authorize design and construction of a distribution line to be fed from a new hydroelectric generation source on the island.The new facility was constructed for incorpora- POLE NUMBERING SIGN tion into the Kodiak Electric Association system.TVACAL BOTH SIDES. TYPICAL 2 PLACES *Routed along the west side of Kizhuyak Bay,the lineF=4 )required several special design considerations.Recorded a winds in excess of 138 mph and heavy icing conditions a in the area required design to NESC "Heavy”loadingcriteria.Salt,sea spray and fog contamination required specification of extended leakage post insulators to °reduce the increased flashover potential created by these conditions.To provide raptor protection for bald eagles and other birds of prey on the island,the crossarm on the delta-configured,standard Rural Electrification Administration VC1 structure used for the line was lowered to allow for additional conductor separation. TYPICAL 2 PLACES (e+)Underground entry at the Port Lions distribution substation involved design of a 550-foot underground run Ne PLMEAQBESNOISES TYPICAL 6 PLACES: TYPICALepaces ({6 TYPICAL 2 PLACES 23 Jae J e7 J 28 TYPICAL PLACES enemaseeneetSECTION B-B Pas-GROUNDING DETAIL VM3-25R LIST OF MATERIALS OESCRITION REGLOSER,TYPE RXE,38)24-144KV,400 AMP=/3-600'S BCT'S,LA ADAPTER KIT (REFERTO SPEC)CBT TRANSTORMER1,7250120,SINGLEw/HV INTERNAL AND GENDOC'PLUG.(WESTINGHOUSE]BY]GS[WlAaoj@|)w]ejolalwl]ow-Byr)-|S=x'BUSING |SPEcIFICATI 4 i T_[RECLOSER POLE MOUNTING EQUPMENT REFER TOSPECItH_JRECLOSER CONTROL CABLE (REFER TO SPEC) i 8 |Crces.an 500 AMPTRCMt"Toca 3 |OCR BY PASS SWITCH,600 AMP,150 Kv BIL3PLACES12A.3 BRIDGES 121 th I 3ra¥LAE POST = i OSTINSULATOR,25KV,ANSI 57-1 __|ARE STOR,9 XV,ANSI C621 w/M1eetSTORMTG.BRACKET [REFER TO | FORM 4SSIONJUMPER TERMINAL,4. LINE POST BRACKET w/10*OFFSET. x I a 20_[-3_[MACHWNE BOLT 5/81 147 a[er 2 $a 22 [TA MOUNTING STUD _5/8x F5/EBSTTTScuaReWASHER22/4rx2-VE aS[ea]ING CLIP WASHER 5/8"a d [ayeEs]. UND CONN TPOST 1-6 5.0.{cOwPRESSION-GORNEETOR 'No.6 TONG 6 Cy.[>j *i36#6 COPPER S.D. #%AS REQUIRED NOTES |.BOLT LENGTHS RE APPROXIMATE,SIZESMAYVARYWITHPOLESIZES. 2 VARIOUS SPRING CLIP WASHERS ARE SHOWN VERTICALLY FOR CLARITY,INSTALL ALL SPRING CLIP WASHERSHORIZONTALLYTOTHELEFT. 3.1A AL 2 APAR'BROENPORS theebe BEPRG OUND |LINE AND (BET.DOWN FROM TOP OF POLE WHERE STAPLESSHALLBESPACEDGISIX)INCHES APART 4 OROP NEUTRAL ATTACHMENT TO 6 FEET FROM STANOARDVCI-2R NEUTRAL POSITION. 5.ATTACH GROUNDING WIRE.TO RECLOSER RACK AS PERMANUFACTURESSPECIFICATIONS. ¢[ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION @ [ISSUED FOR BIOONG Rides zed 4 [{S3SUED FOR APPROVAL 28 53)Freer |OPLoadREVISIONS:JOATE |BY |APPR ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY TERROR LAKE-PORT LIONS14.4/24.9KV LINE 3.6 OIL CIRCUIT RECLOSER BY-PASS SECTION A-A TE NTs aeCODOLLror9hed OOH utilizing directly buried 4/0 URD cable.Other special design features included specification of a three-phase oil circuit recloser for line protection and design of a recloser bypass structure at the Port Lions termination. POWER's design of the express distribution facility in- volved coordination with the hydroelectric powerhouse contractor to ensure proper systems mechanical and electrical interface.In addition to its design respon- sibilities,POWER conducted required system studies and provided various land services for the project,which was completed on schedule and under estimated cost. PROJECT COMPLETION:September 1983 PROJECT COST:$986,000 CLIENT BELUGA 138-230KV STATION COOK INLET,ALASKA Chugach Electric Association (CEA) CLIENT'S NEED Design and construct a facility to provide voltage transfor- mation,metering,line protection and switching as part of a major project to convert CEA's 138kV transmission system to 230kV. DESIGN SERVICES Access Road Steel Structures Station Layout Foundations Oil Spill Containment Cable &Conduit Grounding Station Service Station Lighting Lightning Shielding Equipment Specifications Insulation Coordination Protection Coordination Relaying &Control Metering SCADA System Interface System Monitoring Construction Drawings DESIGN FEATURES @ Three-breaker ring bus convertible to breaker-and-a-half Extensive site preparation Zone 4 seismic area Special foundation design Oil spill containment system Design interface with existing facility SCADA system interface Station annunciator with local and remote alarms MAJOR EQUIPMENT m 3-phase,138-230kV,180/240/300-MVA autotransformer (existing) mw 3-phase,230kV,2000-amp oil circuit breakers m 3-pole,230kV,1200-amp motor-operated airbreak switches m@ 3-pole,230kV,1200-amp manual-operated air- break switches m 230kV capacitor voltage transformers PROJECT DESCRIPTION Chugach Electric Association,Alaska's largest utility, selected POWER Engineers to design a new switching- substation facility at its Beluga Generating Plant.The Beluga 230kV Station will provide voltage transformation, metering,line protection and switching for existing and Ne future 230kV transmission from the gas-fired generating plant to expanding load centers 40 miles away in the Anchorage area. The project is being designed and constructed in two phases.Phase |consisted of the design of a three- breaker ring bus scheme to provide protection and switching for an existing 138-230kV,300-MVA autotransformer,a 230kV line and a 138kV line to be con- verted to 230kV.Phase II design involves the addition of a second 230kV,300-MVA autotransformer bay and three more circuit breakers to convert the station to a breaker-and-a-half scheme.Design provision is also being made for addition of a future 230kV line terminal. 106-0 ]160°-0 | |LigaI1HARE Tra 3 aA 'AA SteHHt+/}fed i Hy b+3 7 er we)ED 4 -SaneAvyfufffed/one +4 |i! Ol |rH nae3aTpyrs ;-Sr _ay a f .a /&OATUMLINE ; a /---1a Z,:i rageetTaansTOREmE LEEE!4 ae me |||me EXISTING 13@KV¥t 1 J TOHVARD.|ppOUTE CINE Severe space constraints in the heavily forested project area dictated siting of the 380'x 270'station addition on an active streambed.This constraint,as well as the station's location in the subarctic zone in a Zone 4 seismic area,required that extensive geotechnical investigation be conducted and elaborate site prepara- tion be performed during Phase I,including stripping of the overburden and use of non-frost-susceptible fill material.In addition,two 60”x 46”flat-bottomed galvanized steel culverts were specified to channel the stream under the north end of the yard and a French C20Mel SECTION A-A_SME 1 00 RTA,Foro WaTzaL drain system was designed to lower the water table.A 10-foot step was incorporated in the station grade to minimize the amount of fill required. 3'-0 4'-6 i'-6 L LADZ1102 { TN o6,#9 VEATICAL 7 ]q 4REBARSAT1°-3 0/C =ul T a){4 a _dwlE|4=Cayery)TIES,TYPE 8,AT 12°0/CILcvA#4 TIES,TYPE A,AT 12°0/C ./Z 7.0.¢. o*DATUM 100.0°(SEE NOTE 3) -a °8,#9 VERTICAL BSZREBARSAT1°-3 0/C-7*F|4 oJ Seer Ao 04 04 TIES,TYPE A &B, AT 12°0/CCVR.GRAVELf=--- ) 2-1°RIGID INSULATION LAYERS EXTENDED 4°-0 PAST EDGE OF FNO BASE.SPLICES TO BE OVERLAPPED21,98 REBARS AT 6°0/C EACH way Ne °vb,*of end 25 %3 egmld:YaaaWaaesaPPbee2'-0abecvR,5'-6 5-6 (TYP,) 44° -0 (SG.) SECTION C-2 TYPE "A" The high water table at the site and the site's susceptibility to frost heaving necessitated special foundation considerations.Shallow-bottomed spread footings were designed to avoid high water-table problems,while buried styrofoam insulating board was specified to prevent frost penetration.To protect the nearby stream from accidental oil contamination, POWER designed a sophisticated oil spill containment system which features concrete-walled catch basins with impermeable membrane liners and imbiber bead drains around all oil containing equipment. Ne Electrical design for Phase |of the Beluga 230kV Station was complex.It involved extensive relaying and control interface with existing station facilities to provide integrated protection coordination.The state-of-the-art protection scheme designed by POWER utilizes dif- ferential and sudden pressure protective relaying for the transformer and bus,breaker failure relaying for each circuit breaker,and distance relaying for the lines. ey By rre{//TS 18X42 %500 XK 42 108 fo§i)|18 16%16 X 375 X50 F i DETAIL 2 i 'i i pi'AO is 06 2 ae x 500 Kota \4\ TS 16 X 42 x $00 \ 4 x 4 3 'q &. \ \6 ' =<y HIPS EAS <10a:. as-ah \'wal '7[hh a ai i \\ --q nen,|__- GROUND PAT .i '{82K DETALL i 'bi 'a 1 32°-0 32°-0 Design interface was also required for the station's new microwave-operated SCADA system.POWER was responsible for placement of the remote terminal unit in the control house and schematic wiring.Other electrical design tasks included a control house annunciator with both local and remote alarms. Structurally,the new station is designed to withstand Zone 4 seismic loads and features tubular steel station structures designed for both strength and aesthetics.Over 300,000 Ibs.of steel were required for the sturdy yet architecturally streamlined structures. Additional POWER responsibilities on the estimated $6.1 million project include design of the line reroutes necessary for proper station-line interface,survey supervision and limited contract administration and construction monitoring services. PROJECT COMPLETION:Phase |-November 1985 Phase II -October 1986 * PROJECT COST:Phase |-$3.2 million Phase Il -$2.9 million * *Estimated MAPCO MAIN PLANT 69-13.8KV SUBSTATION NORTH POLE,ALASKA cd fOeceedgteitwepeaneeupeanaeanreine2eeeeasPeethEeeiheelag CLIENT MAPCO Petroleum,Inc. CLIENT'S NEED Provide,on a compressed schedule,an upgraded power supply for existing and new facilities comprising a $60 million expansion of MAPCO's North Pole Refinery near Fairbanks,Alaska. DESIGN SERVICES Station Layout Site Preparation Steel Structures Foundations Oil Spill Containment Cable &Conduit Grounding Control Building Station Service Station Lighting DESIGN FEATURES Foundation design for frost heaving Oil spill containment system Extreme-temperature provisions Protective schemes for reverse power flow VAR fluctuation control SCADA system interface Compressed design-construction schedule Lightning Shielding Equipment Specifications Insulation Coordination Protection Coordination Relaying &Control Metering SCADA System Interface Design Manual Preparation Construction Drawings Testing &Energization MAJOR EQUIPMENT m Dual 3-phase,69-13.8/8kV,10/12.5-MVA power transformers with LTC 3-phase,69kV,1200-amp SF,gas circuit breakers 69kV,1200-amp group-operated airbreak switches 69kV,600-amp group-operated airbreak switches 13.8kV capacitor banks 13.8kV metal-clad switchgear PROJECT DESCRIPTION The MAPCO Main Plant Substation was designed by POWER Engineers as part of a $60 million project to expand MAPCO's North Pole Oil Refinery near Fairbanks to process asphalt and sulpholane and increase crude oil processing capacity.The new dual-transformer, 25-MVA station supplies power to all refinery facilities via six underground feeders,with design provision for two additional feeders.Its main-with-bypass bus scheme allows for isolation of the power circuit breakers for maintenance,or total station bypass if required. Design of the facility,located in Alaska's subarctic zone, presented several engineering challenges.The most significant of these involved site preparation.Sited out of necessity on an old riverbed with a shallow water table, the station would have been extremely susceptible to frost heaving during the frigid Alaskan winters.To eliminate this potentially serious problem,POWER civil engineering personnel specified excavation of the entire substation site,placement of a special fabric lining under foundations,and backfill with non-frost-susceptible fill material.In addition,special spread-footing foundations with frost barriers were designed to neutralize the site's ee CONN,OCT So rou coenaren am mean eescH saw ."Bho sean wus so vr sreeBhoeaetnesantosences@Sepomsruseswwroucnone:Pha -cro crema sro wane mane erent comecnionPoELBEeeenetae1APcommon9cronwed1eohecamearemeron'AH sera,encumcem me seToR-<fi }-»-_--TO EART moans wa tet mae semester.carta.anoe scoy Mees scan 25@@---!PP pee |ho"0 :! 3 Es cen hye te FFF}pm voor er ie owen sme onc newer a saan ren Taamsri fePa----peoee;icalaii5>Ougaet]idt-«[ifJ)»$+woe PSESRERSERAhigh water table and severe winter freezing problems.Due to its proximity to the existing river,the new facility also required an oil spill containment pit around each of the transformers. The subarctic climate imposed other special design considerations.Winter temperatures in the -40°F to -70°F range required specification of two oil heaters per transformer,extra equipment insulation and placement of the 13.8kV metal-clad switchgear inside the station's super-insulated control building. Interface with other plant electrical systems provided additional engineering challenges.Special relaying arrangements were designed to protect the station and utility supply against reverse power flow from in-plant generation,while two capacitor banks were specified to control VAR-induced voltage fluctuations on the feeders caused by the plant generation. Complex design interface was also required with the local utility's SCADA system and the main plant Foxboro Spec- trum Coordinated Control System.POWER coordinated its design effort closely with the local utility,MAPCO and the other electrical contractors on the project to ensure proper systems interface. Additional POWER responsibilities with regard to the main plant substation included design of the 69kV transmission source loop,material procurement, construction inspection,and testing and ener- gization.Designed and constructed on a fast-track schedule,the modern facility was energized on time. PROJECT COMPLETION:September 1984 PROJECT COST:$1.8 million SPAR CANYON -SOUTH BUTTE 230KV LINE CENTRAL IDAHO CLIENT Salmon River Electric Cooperative (SREC) CLIENT'S NEED Provide an HV power supply for the new Cyprus Thomp- son Creek Molybdenum Mine in central Idaho. DESIGN SERVICES Route Selection ®@ Insulation Structure Selection @ Structure Spotting Structure Analysis @ Plan-Profile Preparation Structure Design @ Material Specifications Foundation Design @ Structure List Conductor Selection @ Design Manual Preparation eSag-Tension Data Construction Drawings DESIGN FEATURES 5505-foot canyon crossing Two 3000-foot-plus spans Use of modified BPA 500kV steel towers Specially designed SCACAR conductor "Extra Heavy”loading Non-specular conductor PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Spar Canyon-South Butte 230kV Line was designed by POWER Engineers and subsequently constructed as the second line segment of a 230kV transmission system supplying power to Cyprus Mines Corporation's new molybdenum mine in the rugged mountains of central Idaho.Financed by Cyprus Mines,the line is owned and maintained by Salmon River Electric Cooperative. The 25-mile wood pole H-frame transmission line originates at SREC's Spar Canyon Switching Station and traverses the rugged terrain of Spar Canyon and the Salmon River Mountains to its South Butte 230-69kV Substation located 7.5 miles from the mine site.Three canyon crossing spans in excess of 3000 feet - including the 5505-foot Kinnikinnic Crossing -attest to the level of engineering required to design this challenging line. Planned for eventual purchase by the Bonneville Power Administration,the majority of the Spar Canyon-South Butte Line was designed by POWER to BPA standards (--) and features standard BPA 230kV H-frame wood structures with Cor-Ten steel crossarms and crossbraces, special "Extra Heavy”loading due to severe weather extremes and winter icing conditions,and 795-kcmil ACSR non-specular conductor with design stringing tensions for a 750-foot ruling span.However,elevation ranging from 5700 to 7800 feet and radical terrain changes presented significant engineering challenges for POWER transmission design personnel. The most challenging of these engineering tasks was undoubtedly design of the 5505-foot Kinnikinnic Cross- ing,one of the longest single spans in the continental United States.The mile-plus span bridges the steep, 1800-foot-deep Kinnikinnic Canyon located near the end of the line.To obtain sufficient phase-to-phase conductor separation,self-supporting 500kV lattice steel towers were specified at both ends of the span.The BPA- designed standard towers required structural modification to accommodate the application of double- deadended shield wires.Design of a separate marker ball span utilizing 54-inch marker balls strung on 5/8-inch EHS steel between wood single-pole structures was also required to obtain Idaho Aeronautics and Public Trans- portation Department (IAPTD)approval of the long crossing. Another substantial engineering task associated with the Kinnikinnic Crossing involved conductor selection.The exceptionally long span required a conductor with a high strength-to-weight ratio for the vertical loading and a high strength-to-diameter ratio for the combined ice and wind loading while still retaining sufficient ampacity for the power requirements.POWER design personnel worked in conjunction with Alcoa engineers to develop a specially stranded 24+18/19,776.8-kcmil SCACAR conductor for use on this and other long canyon crossing spans on the line. In addition to the Kinnikinnic Crossing,design of long spans for crossings of the east fork and main branches of the Salmon River was also required.The 3383-foot East Fork Salmon Crossing and the 3273-foot Main Salmon Crossing both necessitated use of the special Alcoa SCACAR conductor strung between wood three- pole structures.Design of separate marker ball spans utilizing 20 and 54-inch marker balls was also required for IAPTD approval of these long spans. Besides complete design responsibility for the $4.7 million line,POWER performed all required land services, survey and construction management through energiza- tion and project closeout. PROJECT COMPLETION:December 1982 PROJECT COST:$4.7 million \©pellet) GEOTHERMAL PUBLIC POWER LINE (GPPL) NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CLIENT Sacramento Municipal Utility District Northern California Power Agency City of Santa Clara Modesto Irrigation District CLIENT'S NEED Conduct preliminary engineering required to satisfy the requirements of the California Energy Commission for licensing a proposed 230kV jointly owned steel tower transmission line known as the Geothermal Public Power Line (GPPL). DESIGN SERVICES Route Selection @ Conductor Optimization Structure Selection @ Conductor Selection Geotech Investigation @ Sag-Tension Data Structure Design ®Insulation Structure Analysis @ Structure Spotting Foundation Design DESIGN FEATURES Conductor and ruling span optimization study Ecomonic analysis of alternatives Preliminary construction cost estimate Double circuit with bundled conductor 13.5 miles of collector system 230kvV line Seismic Zones 3 and 4 design criteria California "Heavy”and "Light?loadings PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Sacramento Municipal Utility District,Northern California Power Agency,City of Santa Clara and Modesto Irrigation District proposed to construct a jointly owned 230kV transmission line to deliver power from several existing and planned geothermal power plants in the Geysers area of Sonoma County,California,to a new switching station located near the town of Williams in the Sacramento Valley,where it will be wheeled on the Western Area Power Administration's existing system to the joint owners'respective systems.The line is needed to provide an outlet for projected joint-owner generation that will exceed existing Geysers area transmission outlet capacity.Line facilities will consist of 61 miles of 230kV transmission line and 13.5 miles of 230kV collector line in the Geysers area.POWER Engineers has provided Ne all preliminary engineering services required to license the project with the newly formed California Energy Commission (CEC). The first phase of the two-phase licensing process involved submission of a Notice of Intent (NOI)document that was designed to provide the CEC and other interested groups with general decision-making infor- mation regarding the project.Upon CEC review and approval of this document,phase two was initiated.This phase involved preparation and submission of the Application for Certification (AFC),a document that more precisely defines all project aspects.Certification for the project is contingent upon the CEC's extensive review and final approval of this document. During the NO!phase of the $60 million-plus transmis- sion project,POWER performed a spectrum of preliminary engineering tasks necessary to identify the following:routing for each of the alternative corridors, voltage levels of proposed lines,tower types and configurations,ruling spans,conductor types and config- urations,code requirements,design criteria,operating criteria,construction methods and schedules,and corona and electrical field effects.In addition,an extensive economic analysis of alternatives and construction cost estimate and was prepared that included ruling span and conductor optimization studies.The vital NOI document ODUMSgnesstoaprand i --WELLIANS WORTH ROUTE f '1 1 1 4 i LOR (UPRER {LIM 1 TMDTRECT,of MATERTAL «CONSTRUCTION 1 |PROZECT AOMTW |CEMERA DO 0 OTN.(omnes6 wosrs ot cyst css 'os i mrs ot COSTS, (f ''i '' f f ''''' Arms 2 Wad 108990638 1 'SoG GH +BBP AR I Sto |WoT G7 1 VSTee1'f ''''nee:71 Sa WS I WoKQPo7S |10 P6809 1 1G"I FIT |WTOAYD 1 'f '' cies ao bat ROBB i BOTS 1 a3 0 oe GFoHS 0 LeGBPOGON 4 1 i '4 fi f Um:So Lae UGB 1 4FO BP Ct Bo GIoSP@ 0 MeBNRERD 1 f i i 'i f LIM:G0 BF 0 R40)0828+BOO |SeBGF 2507 &UBF cg 1 BUG 1 FetHSH i i t u t io Wi 220 1420007 1 0078 i CHoBS 1 FRAG 1 1B cRls 0 LSAT ORR(i t 'a '( Lom:at 18 O lt Poe<2 or a 20GB ATS F HOt 1 WLS 1 écRke 78S('t ''' aes Wt ot Boas abe t HOPE b wea A BGP 1 WTA 1 '''' ue:fai OO 3800080»20S 0RD Ft VoPNGTPE I Toa I EMBL GPR ''4 i ''i i f ''i i f i i i i a t ' 5 i :t t J i i i U 'a i i f i 1 i i i i 1 f i t t i i v i i 1 i 'i (f t t t 4 u a i 1 f i 't i i]t fl i '' 'l \i i '' i 4 1 't 't 1 ''4 i '4 i 1 i 'i '' i i 'a ('' i i 4 1 i i 4 i i f i i 1 i i i i 4 4 '4 1 i i 4 i i] 2 i i i 1 i Live COST TOiALss i BW 1 MEDERMA 4 LbeSBPoA 0 So9M0R7S 1 BDF 1 NBA f 1 u i a a i l i i l i ae acne i i i t i f a J 4 i f] ROUTE RIUS au:i 4 v f 4 i 'i ''i assisted the joint owners in selecting a preferred route and provided the CEC with an important body of economic information concerning the alternatives. For the AFC,POWER transmission design personnel conducted in-depth studies and calculations required to establish the design parameters to be utilized for final design of the line facilities.These included recom- mended tower types and configurations,mechanical- structural design criteria,conductor configuration,tower height requirements,phase spacings and other pertinent design aspects.In addition,preliminary structure spotting was performed during this stage to assist in establishing a definite route to be submitted in the AFC as the joint owners'preferred route. Recommended design features of the 61-mile main transmission line include 57 miles of double-circuit, vertically configured steel lattice towers through the mountainous portion of the line and 4 miles of double- circuit,tubular steel poles leading into the new switching Station in the Sacramento Valley.Two-conductor bundled ACSR "Seahawk”was identified in POWER's conductor optimization study as the best conductor application for the 1000-MW-capacity line.Due to high recorded winds and elevation in excess of 3000 feet,California "Heavy” loading was identified for portions of the line.The pro- posed GPPL's location in Zone 3 and 4 seismic areas required additional final design loading criteria to be recommended. POWER design personnel identified both single-and double-circuit,single-and bundled-conductor segments for the 13.5-mile steel tower collector line in the Geysers area,based on projected generation loads.The optimum conductor identified for this tine was AAC 'Marigold.' Recorded winds near 100 mph in the Geysers area will require application of a special high-wind loading con- dition to final design,along with additional seismic Zone 4 loading considerations. In addition to preliminary design of the transmission facilities for the GPPL,POWER aiso provided preliminary design and cost estimates for the various station alter- natives and conducted all land and environmental services associated with this phase of the project. PROJECT COMPLETION:In progress PROJECT COST:$61 million (estimated) OrDOMEL/ RIFLE -SAN JUAN 345KV LINE COLORADO AND NEW MEXICO CLIENT Colorado-Ute Electric Association,tnc. CLIENT'S NEED Gain approval of the preferred route through San Miguel County,Colorado,for Colorado-Ute's proposed $170 million Rifle-San Juan 345kV Line between Colorado and New Mexico. DESIGN SERVICES (PRELIMINARY) @ Data Review @ Sag-Tension Data Route Selection ®Structure Spotting Structure Selection @ Plan-Profile Preparation Structure Design ©Expert Testimony DESIGN FEATURES a Comprehensive economic analysis of alternatives m Impact mitigation measures a Development of routing alternatives PROJECT DESCRIPTION POWER Engineers and WIRTH Environmental Services of Golden,Colorado,were retained by Colorado-Ute to devise routing alternatives and impact mitigation measures that would gain county approval of the preferred route through San Miguel County,Colorado, for its proposed 275-mile Rifle-San Juan 345kV trans- mission line between Colorado and New Mexico.The joint-venture project with Western Area Power Admin- istration is designed to meet Colorado-Ute's projected system loads and improve system reliability,as well as to strengthen a weak transmission link between the two states. The single-circuit steel tower EHV line,which will originate at Colorado-Ute's Rifle 345kV Substation in western Colorado and terminate at Public Service Company of New Mexico's San Juan 345kV Switchyard near Farmington,New Mexico,had encountered con- siderable public and county opposition in San Miguel County.Colorado-Ute's preferred route,although en- dorsed over another alternative by a special independent task force commissioned by the county,was opposed by a well-organized group of landowners who feared the potential visual,environmental and economic impacts associated with this route.It was the task of POWER and the environmental consultant,WIRTH,to listen to the concerns of county residents and officials and develop Ne routing alternatives with appropriate mitigation measures to satisfy both sides and clear the way for county issuance of the required Special Use Permit. To allay fears of county officials and residents that the preferred route,which parallels an existing Western line through most of San Miguel County,would eventually become a multi-line transmission corridor,POWER recommended use of a vertically configured double- circuit steel tower that could be economically upgraded to two circuits at a future date without construction of another line.This allowed 1)Colorado-Ute the option of determining how much of the line to construct double circuit initially to save eventual upgrade costs and 2)San Miguel County to stipulate in the Special Use Permit that no additional structures will be erected in the corridor. POWER performed an extensive preliminary economic analysis of alternative phase configurations for single- and double-circuit structures that also identified this alternative as the most economically feasible should future additional capacity be required. POMER ENGINEERS INC.RIFLE SAN JUAN 345 kV LINE CASE 42 DOUBLE CIRCUIT VERTICAL CONFIGURATION LATTICE STRUCTURE warms INITIAL SINGLE CIRCUIT CONSTRUCTION xxmxa WILE HARKER:6.0 TO 1.0 { {IMOIRECT COSTS LENGTH:1.0 ' | VOLTAGES kv Kan]'LICENSING /PERMITTING 9950 |R-O-1 ACQUISITION 18/818 CIRCUITS:DOUBLE |SURVEYS 15976 t DESIGN 129326 GUNDLE:OOUBLE { 'SUBTOTAL INOIRECTS 420570 'CONDUCTOR:BITTERN 1 ( WUMBER OHGH'S:3/8"2 'MATERIAL COSTS ' RULING SPAMS 1200 ! |STRUCTURES 799070 STRUCTURE TYPE?LATTICE 'FOOTINGS Baink=] {CONDUCTOR 301087 'SUSPENSION?VEE STRING 'ONGH /COUNTERPOISE 2575 1 CONDUCTOR HARDMARE 21400 ROM WIDTH:FEET-1%'TSULATORS 8592 'SPACERS £DAPERS 27190 LOADING;HEAVY t STORES EXPENSE 18933 i 'STRUCTURES/MILE 44 'SUBTOTAL MATERIALS 2060243 ' ANCLES 2 DE'S/MILE?0.2 ( 'CONSTRUCTION COSTS. CONSTRUCTION METHOD;(LAND-BORKE ( ' TERRAIN:Flat t 'STAKING 764 ROLLING 1001 i R-O-W PREPARATION 11370 CANYON t {ACCESS CONSTRUCTION 151050 ROUNTAIN t 'FOOTING INSTALLATION 7S i 'STRUCTURE ERECTION 9,371 VECETATION:ORUSH wr 'CONDUCTOR STRINGING 189265 Le)wr i OHGH STRINGING 39828 TIGER 2 5 CH /INSPECTION 715 ARI I 4 'SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION 2089268 SOIL CLASS?st z I LOM 100 2 ' quar z (OVERHEAD AMD ADATNISTRATION Ht ROK 1 ' | Us®GERSHIP?UsFs z | ON %2 |TOTAL COSTS 5091602 PRIVATE 2 (STATE z ' CLUES/ eSsiaWerear73H.onss!BarorsemTHE CONDUCTOR CURVE SHOWN VS THAT USEO] FOR DETERMIANG STRUCTURE LOCATIONS. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL ONLY Working in close conjunction with WIRTH,POWER generated preliminary-level plan-profile drawings showing structures spotted along the preferred route as well as alternative routes in visually impacted areas. These alternative routes included four scenarios for crossing the mile-wide,1400-foot-deep San Miguel Canyon that ranged from a 6300-foot clear span to an alternative that would minimize line visibility from the state highway in the canyon below.Generation of viable routing alternatives that mitigated potential visual impacts did much to relieve concerns in the county regarding this sensitive issue. Other impact mitigation measures recommended by POWER included use of non-specular conductor,no new access roads without county approval,possible routing around a local scenic landmark known as "Big Baldy,” and matching the tower spacing of the existing 230kV line. Due largely to the consulting efforts of POWER and WIRTH,San Miguel County eventually issued a Special Use Permit that was agreeable to all involved parties.The county incorporated several of POWER's recommenda- tions into the permit that assured it of considerable control over its areas of concern while still allowing Colorado-Ute sufficient latitude to meet existing and future power requirements. Ne PROJECT COMPLETION:tn progress PROJECT COST:$170 million ODMSngreeshoopated CLIENT Salmon River Electric Cooperation (SREC) CLIENT'S NEED Complete a mine loop to 1)enable Cyprus Mines'new molybdenum mine to be fed from two different directions and 2)supply power for a 5-mile-long water-pumping system. DESIGN SERVICES Route Selection ®Structure Spotting Structure Selection @ Plan-Profile Preparation Structure Design @ Structure List UG System Design @ UG Staking Sheet Prep. Conductor Selection ®Material Specifications Sag-Tension Data)@ Design Manual Preparation einsulation Construction Drawings DESIGN FEATURES Specially designed single-pole structure Large conductor Extreme terrain-weather conditions NESC "Heavy”loading Underground design Visual impact mitigation PROJECT DESCRIPTION As one of the line components of a major power supply to serve the new Cyprus Thompson Creek Molybdenum Mine in central Idaho,12 miles of 69kV wood single-pole transmission line underbuilt with three-phase 24.9kV distribution was designed by POWER Engineers.The new facility included .5 mile of 24.9kV direct-buried,three- phase underground.The 69kV transmission line was designed to complete a power loop to the mine,thus ensuring continuity of service during an outage to the main feeder,while the 24.9kV underbuild and three-phase underground supply power to water-pumping facilities located adjacent to the line.In the event of an outage to the main 69kV feeder to the mine,a portion of transmission conductor on the Thompson Creek Loop Line can be energized to feed the mine from the opposite direction. Originating as a tap off an existing SREC line,one segment of the mine-loop follows a water pipeline for a portion of its 5-mile route through steep terrain to the mine site substation some 2200 feet above.The main Ne THOMPSON CREEK MINE LOOP 69KV LINE WITH 24.9KV UNDERBUILD CENTRAL IDAHO feeder segment of the line originates at SREC's Squaw Creek 69-24.9kV Substation located 7 miles below the mine and feeds the mine substation from the opposite direction.Sections of extremely rugged,steep terrain in both line segments required careful routing and struc- ture spotting to avoid conductor clearance-tension problems. Use of 795-kemil ACSR conductor to handle the heavy mine loads required design of a special,extra-sturdy single-pole structure capable of supporting the heavy conductor and underbuild,while severe winter weather to -50°F dictated use of NESC "'Heavy”loading criteria. The reinforced wood pole structure,modeled on the Rural CLUE/ one &' T:Ee||@@@®©O |Bs 2=e {1 i Oe.|aa +=ro a4ayyxeS)SS @ &)ete a mag _eo ©Ole zm 4 | OCC)i ."mmf &(8 cam 34 Moo]&Ae 7 SS. TP-9 WITH VC9-3R U.B. SECTION AWA BODBOOS[lelselaseel]e/f6TTTB)a)elalajaralelsisielsaa sare ar CYPRUS THOMPSON CREEK |MINING COMPANY |THOMPSON CREEX MINE LOOP|_SPRY with 14.4/24.9KV UB.TP-9 W/VCS8-3A UB. coe”NE]TPH9 w/ _]vc9-3R ug Electrification Administration's TP-3 structure,was selected both for its substantial cost savings to the client over H-frame or steel structures and for its lesser visual impact.Non-specular conductor was specified to further reduce the visual impact of the line in its scenic national forest location. POWER also provided complete construction manage- ment services including contract administration,material procurement and construction inspection for the project which,despite a mid-construction contractor change,was energized on schedule and under budget. PROJECT COMPLETION:August 1983 PROJECT COST:$1.1 million 87-10-2003 Relevant Project Experience - Hart Crowser &Associates The following section briefly describes selected Alaska and Pacific Northwest projects completed by Hart Crowser and its key personnel.The matrix on the following page categorizes these and other projects according to technical discipline. 1)Environmental Over-the-Horizon Backscatter EIS Project,Alaska Hart Crowser has been retained by SRI International as the major Alaska subcontractor for preparation of an EIS on the Air Force's OTH-B radar project in the Copper and Tanana River basins.In association with the Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEIDC)of the University of Alaska,Hart Crowser is responsible for preparing the draft and final EIS in the following topical areas:land and minerals,including geological and permafrost conditions;surface water and groundwater hydrology; vegetation and wetlands;fisheries and wildlife;subsistence;and cultural resources.The project involves a number of alternative study areas ranging from 1,500 to 4,300 feet in elevation and from 10 to 230 square miles in area. North Warning System EIS,Alaska Hart Crowser was retained to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)for the North Warning System in Alaska.This project involves the installation of a total of eight long range and short range radar facilities both at existing DEW Line Stations on the North Slope and at high altitude locations in undeveloped, remote areas throughout the state;in addition,two existing DEW Line Stations will be decommissioned.In assoctation with the Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center (AEIDC)of the University of Alaska,Hart Crowser has assessed the effects of electromagnetic (radio frequency)radiation on humans, electroexplosive devices,plants and animals,and communication systems.Other issues addressed in this document include the effects of new site development on wildlife,subsistence and recreational opportunities and the effects of facility decommissioning on native communities.The program has included three site survey trips and numerous meetings in Alaska communities Environmental Projects,Washincion aiid Alaska .Firm and Key Staff Experience ” =ara.>rz)9/82]« o fo}[s)o ,c a!2 7)o|s!¢/]2Q=}8 Oo}%mm}oO [=]c o E o]SIgS2s£;qa =/s$/oa 2 MO1sia 2o2>loaolalec en oe a e ©ie.)S;j;o?|;Pie o|o 2=/3!/3/O1s5]©=Ke)$3/5/a 2 &'Ss =z @ a So =7]==oO -ran- /S/;alx»Oo}s{2 o/s/5/]82 siolo|wj*|sofSSstioloilY<l/s/o}e]e]2 2 o}/f£io}ls|o|]2SiE/e]s/3)2/o/5/8)8)2/2)212/818)58/2/21Sl1sja!1a/8/6/e/)/2)/e/5/5}8)51 co'e/s/5s}3s]2fCjiofjoasj<tlae fal ej rysl<epejsalelazajal<¢|/al ojziu Vader Lignite Mine e e|e @,;@e;@ej;j@e;,;@ete;@ij@el;@el@je@e;/e;e/;]e:e _ =|Bellcoal Coal Terminal e ele @;@i@e |@j@e ;@eijeiei@ejejeieiele;e g@ |West Coast Port ..t @e;@eie@e;ie;e e eaSiteEvaluations°bd bd bd© Cc 2 Wainwright Coal Study e @e;@ei@e/@j s@e(/@e@ @i i @iselr@ei/@ei@ei/@elj@etitielejiel/e 5 . 4 |Chugach Natives ®&Regulatory Analysis e e Suneel Alaska Regulatory Analysis °°° North Warning System e@;e @;e@;@ ;@e;@e@ir@e;;@ij@ej@eij;@el@e;@jij@e;@ie;e@ie oo |Cmank Smat ele C)eielelelel;e/eieieleieiejeiec|Hydropower Project E Bullen Point e ele eieleleie eo©|Industrial Center e;e;e;e;elel;ele ¢ a £Kuparuk Industrial Center|@ |@ |@ e e,;e|e @jei@ei;@e@ie;@e@;e/\e 2e€|Seward Coal elele eiele ®2 Handling Facility e;e > cw*|Alaska Railroad e eCoalTransportatione;e e e;e;e;e ;e;e;el;e;e R osebud Coal Mine ele ele ele .eleieExpansionProject Yukon-Kuskokwim Coastal e e©>Management Program bad e e;e;e;e;e;e e;e;e;e SS North Slope Borough5c|Land Development @|\|e;e @®@;@i;@ej@e;@ei@e;/@e;si;@ie@e;e;e|;e|e %21 Zoning Ordinancece Anchorage Wetlands Study]@ e;e/\e @el|@e;@ie;e;e e;elei;e!le Denali National Park e : 'el:Artifact Cataloging bh Susitnary ..@®i;e;@e @;e;}@eo|Hydroelectric Project . is) foe 52 Wikeson Coal e ele e|\e e,;er4ExplorationProjectcq|West Creek ;e eie @,;e;ess|Hydroelectric Project 3 it Mol irs)Quartz Hill Molybdenum Mine e elele :eleleCulturalResourcesSurvey Koyukuk Region e e e ie eleie Navigability Study i ! HART-CROWSER &associates inc. J HARTSomCROWSER &associates inc. Firm &Key Staff Experience Alaska TUoOous09)OQmas”RetainingStructuresGroundWater&ShoredExcavations&DewateringColdRegionEngineering&ResearchThermalAnalysis&Perma-frostCharacterizationPileFoundationsFill&EmbankmentDesignPlans&SpecificationsFieldExploration&LaboratoryTestingRockMechanics&TunnelingLiquefactionAssessmentEarthquakeDesign&SlopeStabilityAnalysisBuildings&Structures15 Story Frontier Building & Parking Garage,Anchorage @|RegulatoryInteraction@|ConstructionMonitoringGVEA Microwave Transmission Towers,Interlor @|@|Spread/MatFoundations6 Story Resolution Plaza, Anchorage 13 Story SOHIO Office Building, Anchorage ADOT Maintenance Facility, Happy Valley Office Building &Parking Garage,Juneau 7 Story Ooubletres Hotel, Anchorage PublicFacilitiesNorth Star Borough Admin. Building.Fairbanks Anchorage Headquarters Library, Anchorage Tanana Chiefs Patient Hospital, Fairbanks North Point Higgins Elementary School,Fairbanks University of Alaska Campus Solls Study,Fairbanks SlopeStabilizationADOT Permatrost Stabilization, Hess Creek Jet Fuel Storage & Containment Berm,NAS Adak Cape Fox Hotei Rock Fill Stabilization,Ketchikan Exxon Temporary Gravel Drilling Pad,North Slope Roadway&Bridges}»ForthStructuresQuartz Hill Access Road, Ketchikan State Fairgrounds Gravel Access Road,Fairbanks U.S.Borax Road and Tunnel, Bakewell Townsite North &South Fork Tunnel Creek Bridges,Ketchikan Utilities&PipelinesFit.Wainwright Water Reservoir &Sewer,Fairbanks Northwest Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline,interior Eklutna Water Project Tunnel, Anchorage Thomas Bay Hydroelectric Oam, Petersburg Hydaburg Water Reservoirs Piers&BulkheadsRemedial Bulkhead Redesign,Kake Japonski Harbor Marina,Sitka Shemya Pier Rehabilitation, Aleutian Islands Quartz Hili Bulkhead Redesign, Ketchikan e;e;e|;ele 87-10-2003 Page 2 with federal,state and local agencies,village organizations,and the general public.Hart Crowser personnel also developed detailed plans for mobilizing equipment and materials and for constructing the facilities in remote locations. Municipality of Anchorage Wetlands Study Hart Crowser personnel managed a study of wetlands and their development /preservation potential.The study included identification,classification,and mapping of wetlands;detailed hydrologic and water quality studies of two selected wetlands;and development of a management program to be implemented by the Municipality of Anchorage.Performance of these tasks involved 'on- site water quality and hydrologic testing,research of existing studies and applicable documents,and interviews and discussions with members of federal,state,and local agencies involved with protection and development of wetlands.The public and interested organizations were also involved in the project through a series of meetings for receiving as well as disseminating information. Chignik Small Hydropower Feasibility Study,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel participated in a feasibility study for small hydropower facilities at Chignik and Chignik Lagoon on the Alaska Peninsula.The purpose of the study was to determine the hydropower potential of three sites;Packer's Creek,Indian Creek, and Mud Bay Lake Creek,in a remote area on the south side of the Peninsula about 500 miles from Anchorage.The project included a foundation and materials investigation,environmental assessment, and economic analysis.The foundation and materials investigation included descriptions of the phystography,geology,and tectonic settings of the project area;descriptions of the stratigraphy and geologic structures of rock at all three sites;groundwater conditions;location of suitable construction materials;and conclusions and recommendations of the geologic feasibility of the site.The environmental assessment,which required close coordination with the Corps of Engineers and the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,addressed the biological,social,and economic impacts of the project.The economic analysis included an economic base study for the region,a benefit-cost analysis for each site, and a benefit analysis comparing each site with the National Economic Development Plan criteria. Bullen Point Siting and Feasibility Study,North Slope,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel provided geotechnical and environmental support to a siting and feasibility analysis of an industrial park at Bullen Point on the North Slope of Alaska.Work included gravel 87-10-2003 Page 3 resource exploration and development,foundation investigations, hazards analysis,and environmental fnventory and site impact assessments. Alaska Railroad Coal Transportation Project Hart Crowser personnel prepared an Environmental Assessment for The Alaska Railroad's lease of a coal terminal site at Seward and the transportation of coal to that site from the Usibelli mine at Healy.Although a broad range of environmental characteristics were addressed in this document,emphasis was placed on the potential significant issues of vibration,noise,air quality and traffic.Field measurements of vibration and noise were made to predict unit-train impacts on homes and other sensitive receptors near the tracks.The air quality analysis concentrated on predictive modeling of coal dust emissions from open rail cars along the route,and the traffic analysis primarily addressed project effects on vehicle congestion nedr at-grade crossings in the Anchorage vicinity. Wainwright Coal Study,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel provided geotechnical and environmental| permitting services for development of a proposed 10,000 ton-per- year coal mine on the northwest Arctic Slope of Alaska.The mine would be used to provide fuel for a proposed central power generation and heating facility that would lower heating costs to the natives of the village of Wainwright.The geotechnical, environmental,permitting,and mining engineering work,which was a continuation of an earlier Wainwright power generation and heating feasibility study,began with permit acquisition for a 20 -borehole exploratory core drilling program and included coal quality analysis,environmental assessment,and preparation of a critical path diagram for permits required to construct and operate both the mine and power plant. Susitna Hydroelectric Project,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel provided cultural resources services for the Susitna Hydroelectric Project.This project consists of two large dams and reservoirs as well as numerous associated facilities along- the Susitna River in a remote area of southcentral Alaska. Archeological surveys and site test excavations have been underway for five years,producing a chronology,based on tephra studies,of hunting stretching more than 5,000 years.Hart Crowser personnel assisted the Harza-Ebasco Susitna Joint Venture on behalf of the Alaska Power Authority in preparing determination of National Register of Historic Place eligibility for significant 87-10-2003 Page 4 archeological sites,assessing project impacts on significant sites,preparing a plan to mitigate adverse impacts,and consulting with state and federal agencies regarding compliance with cultural resources laws and regulations. Denali National Park Artifact Cataloging,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel performed curatorial inspection and cataloging of all archeological remains which were collected in Denali National Park during the past 25 years.The work was performed for the National Park Service,Alaska Regional Office. It was undertaken in Fairbanks,Alaska,and Boston,Massachusetts, and involved inventorying a variety of artifact collections, cataloging them to Park Service Standards,and compiling documentary information on then. West Creek Hydroelectric Project Cultural Resources Assessment, Alaska Hart Crowser personnel performed a cultural resources survey and summary assessment for the West Creek Hydroelectric Project near Skagway,Alaska.The project consisted of research design development,review of existing data,and survey and testing of sensitive areas in and near the Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park potentially affected by project activities.A final report was prepared detailing survey findings,evaluating the significance of identified sites,and identifying potential project impacts and mitigation measures. Quartz Hill Molybdenum Mine Cultural Resources Services,Southeast Alaska Hart Crowser personnel performed an on-site cultural resources survey for the U.S.Borax Quartz Hill Molybdenum Project near Ketchikan,Alaska.The project consisted of developing a research design and surveying an approximate 1l10-mile access road and associated facilities,including tidewater staging area,barge unloading area,and quarries.In addition to the field surveys, staff members prepared a report discussing study methods and results,evaluating the potential of sites discovered for the National Register of Historic Places,determining project impacts and recommending mitigative measures. Koyukuk Region Navigability Studies,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel conducted a series of studies to provide the Alaska Department of Natural Resources with documentation of travel,trade,commerce,and economic development of the state as 87-10-2003 Page 5 related to the use of inland water bodies.These studies are serving as a resource information base to assist in presentation of State claims to lands beneath navigable waters.Staff members' primary responsibility covered the Koyukuk hydrological region and included bibliographic compilation,archival research in repositories throughout the United States,and computerized data processing.Hart Crowser personnel produced a final report summarizing regional historical development with a focus on waterbody use,and a section outlining the specific data gathered on each waterbody in the Koyukuk drainage. North Slope Borough Planning Studies,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel conducted analyses to assist Alaska's North Slope Borough in developing its Coastal Management Plan and land development ordinances.The focus of the project was to refine the plan and related components so that they correspond to state requirements and balance potentially conflicting uses of the coastal zone such as Native subsistence petroleum resources.In compliance with the Alaska Subsistence Law of 1978,which recognizes subsistence hunting and fishing as priority uses of Alaska's wildlife resources,our cultural resources staff made on- site visits to review information and consult a variety of agencies,organizations,and individuals at all tlevels of government about traditional land use and cultural resource sites. Our work on the Coastal Management Plan provided for balanced use of the coastal zone by including steps to preserve Native Alaskans' opportunities to pursue subsistence activities at traditional sites while facilitating development of petroleum facilities. Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Coastal Zone Management Program Cultural Resources Studies,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel completed a study of coastal areas in the rural Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta area of Alaska as part of a coastal zone management program.The cultural resources portion of the study included literature searches and consultations with staff members from federal and state agencies to collect data on area history,anthropology,and archeology.This work resulted in a map overlay showing the locations of important cultural resources sites and sensitive areas within the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. 2)Geotechnical and Constructability Studies Eklutna Water Project Tunnel,Alaska Hart Crowser recently provided prime final design services for the Lake Diversion Tunnel Element of the Eklutna Water Project for the 87-10-2003 Page 6 Municipality of Anchorage.The 1.5-mile-long,72-inch I.D.tunnel will supply potable water to the Municipality from Eklutna Lake (a glacier-fed lake about 40 miles from Anchorage).Anticipated tunneling ground conditions are very dense,overconsolidated glacial till consisting of sands and gravels likely to include numerous cobbles and boulders.Groundwater is also present at tunnel grade,requiring dewatering of some tunnel sections. Project construction is anticipated to begin in the near future. North Warning System Constructability Analysis,Alaska Hart Crowser personnel developed construction scenarios and estimated incremental construction costs for seven alternative North Warning System radar sites for U.S.Air Force,Electronic Systems Division.These sites were located in remote,undeveloped locations both on the North Slope and in the interior of Alaska. Hart Crowser personnel developed plans for staging and transporting equipment and materials;site preparation including cut and fill requirements;construction camp development;and facility construction,including thermal protection of permafrost.Because of the remoteness of these sites,emphasis was placed on calculating load characteristics and maximizing the efficiency of helicopter transport.Criteria were developed for comparing construction costs among the alternative sites. Quartz Hill Roads,Southeast Alaska Hart Crowser has worked on three different projects for U.S.Borax and Chemical Corporation pertaining to roads,including bridge and tunnel sections,for the proposed Quartz Hill Mine. Hart Crowser accomplished subsurface exploration and geotechnical design studies for two highway bridges at Tunnel Creek.These timber span,steel pile supported bridges are permanent facilities which were designed so as to readily enable expansion for future traffic increases.Design recommendations included vertical and lateral pile capacities,estimated settlements,lateral earth pressures on abutment walls,and structural fill characteristics. Recommendations for geotechnical work during construction and on the construction process itself were provided. Our firm prepared a geotechnical engineering report for the nine mile access road for the mine site to a deep water pier on Wilson Arm.The alignment includes sections of muskeg but is typically on steeply ground in an environmentally sensitive area.This work included geologic field observations,review of geologic data collected by others,and extensive interaction with the Forest Service and others.Hart Crowser also provided recommendations on 87-10-2003 Page 7 remedial measures to minimize slope stability damages,and to date only minor instability has occurred. Working with a road locator,Hart Crowser accomplished geologic reconnaissance and mapping for a feasiblity assessment of alternative routes from the deep water pier to the proposed Bakewell Townsite.Different road alignment alternatives were considered to minimize initial construction cost as well as maintenance costs over the estimated 70 year project life,and to minimize adverse environmental impacts.Geotechnical recommendations included tunnel excavation and support, construction of road cuts and fills,trestle supported roadwayon steep sloping ground,and bridges.Special considerations included avalanche chutes and massive bedrock cliffs with deposits of loose, unstable talus. Northwest Natural Gas Transportation System,Alaska A member of Hart Crowser's staff was directly involved with the development of a slope stability design manual and design criteria for a gravel road along the proposed 743-mile pipeline alignment through Alaska.The slope stability manuals contained nearly 300 pages and addressed the effects of pipeline and road construction on stability of hundreds of slopes underlain by permafrost and non permafrost soils.Design criteria for the gravel road included design charts which provided a quick means of determining the minimum thickness of gravel and insulation to prevent thaw below a gravel road. Campus Soil Study,University of Alaska,Fairbanks,Alaska Hart Crowser was selected to accomplish a soil study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks Campus encompassing 2,000 acres. During the reconnaissance phase,ground penetrating radar was used as a cost-effective method to characterize the site subsurface conditions to assist in future site development.Mapping was accomplished noting shallow bedrock and areas of possible ice/frozen soils below the ground surface using the ground penetrating radar data correlated with existing subsurface information. Frontier Building,Anchorage,Alaska Hart Crowser provided geotechnical engineering services for design of the 15-story Frontier Building,south of downtown Anchorage. Subsurface conditions in the project area consisted of deep surficial peat overlying dense glacial soils.Frost-susceptible soils are found in the general area of the project site.Many 87-10-2003 Page 8 structures in the area are pile supported.Our firm provided innovative recommendations for removal and replacement of the highly compressible organic soils below the 5-story parking garage structure and the office tower.The tower itself was founded on high capacity,cost-effective shallow spread footings following dewatering and overexcavation of the peat soils.Settlement of the building was carefully monitored throughout construction. Resultant lateral and differential settlements were well within the predicted values and tolerable limits. Sohio Office Building,Anchorage Geotechnical engineering considerations were developed by Hart- Crowser for construction of four high-rise office structures for the Sohio Alaska Petroleum Company in Anchorage.The initial 13- story Phase I structure is now complete.Criteria for shallow foundation design and construction below a surficial peat layer were provided,along with the recommendations for general site preparation (removal of peat and replacement with non-frost- susceptible structural fill).A one-story basement structure is incorporated into the office tower which required design of a detailed drainage system to accommodate high groundwater levels above the basement floor slab. Lower Kuskokwim School District,Bethel Hart Crowser provided geotechnical engineering services for school construction at Kwethluk,Oscarville,Kwigillingok,and Mekoryuk. The sites at Kwigillingok and Mekoryuk are underlain by ice-rich silt at temperatures only slightly below freezing,with isolated zones containing saline pore water.Recommendations included passive thermo-piles for the school buildings and a passive refrigerated pad for the water storage tank at Kwigillingok.Post and pad foundations were designed for Kwthluk and Oscarville to support the structures above anticipated flood stages on the loose sand deposits common to the Kuskokwim Delta.Sporadic permafrost was encountered at Kwethluk.Hart Crowser was on site throughout the installation of this foundation to determine on a pad-specific basis,where heat removal devices were required to maintain isolated pockets of frozen ground.At Oscarville,foundation excavations were extended into the permafrost below the phreatic- water level.Our inspectors monitored each excavation to remove as much permafrost as practical while maintaining enough frozen ground to control the inflow of groundwater during foundation construction. O315L POWER Engineers,Inc. CLIENT REFERENCES Mr.Doug Powel! Oxbow Geothermal Company 200 S$.Virginia St.,Suite 450 Reno,NV 89501 (702)322-1300 Mr.Dave McClain California Energy Company 3333 Mandictno,Suite 100 Santa Rosa,CA 9540] (707)526-1000 Jay C.Hauth Mother Earth Industries,Inc. 3761 South 700 East,Suite 200 Salt Lake City,UT 84106 (801)263-8300 Mr.Ed Kozak Kodiak Electric Association Box 787 Kodiak,AK 99615 (907)486-3261 Mr.Gary Ransom Alaska Power Authority 701 East Tudor Road Anchorage,AK 99519-0869 (907)561-7877 Ms.Dora Gropp Chugach Electric Association 5601 Minnesota Or.,Box 6300 Anchorage,AK 99502-0300 (907)563-7494 Mr.Dennis Lewis City of Petersburg Box 329 Petersburg,AK 99833 (907)772-4203 TII-97 @D0UeL)Pcapaas HART CROWSER,INC. CLIENT REFERENCES Col.Art Kishiyama USAF Electronic Systems Division (617)377-3341 Dr.Sid Everett SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park,CA (415)859-3985 Mr.Tom Arminsky Alaska Power Authority Anchorage,AK (907)561-7877 Mr.Charlie Bryant Municipality of Anchorage Anchorage,AK (907)279-2461 Mr.Bill Noll Suneel Alaska Anchorage,AK (907)224-3120 Mr.Ted Trueblood The Alaska Railroad Anchorage,AK (907)265-2457 III-98 CLM) POWER REPRESENTATIVE CLIENT LIST Names of client contacts and phone numbers in addition to those furnished in this section are available upon request. Industrial Clients Energy Research and Development Admin. Westinghouse Corporation Morrison-Knudsen Company EG and G,Idaho INEL Contractor Monsanto Stauffer Chemical Company AMAX FMC MAPCO J.R.Simplot Amoco Minerals Cyprus Mines Brooks Minerals,Inc. Bunker Hill Mines,Inc. Day Mines,Inc. Homestake Mines JUB Engineers U.S.Department of Commerce Burley Irrigation District Industrial Power Technology Westmoreland Coal Washington Water Power Company Western States Minerals Utility Clients Bonneville Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Alaska Power Authority Washington Water Power Company Fl Paso Electric Company U.S.Department of Energy Salmon River Electric Cooperative Wells Rural Electric Cooperative Colorado-UTE Electric Assn.,Inc. Sacramento Municipal Utility District Modesto Irrigation District Chugach Electric Association Citizens Utilities Company Los Angeles Dept.of Water &Power Kodiak Electric Association Payson City Corporation City of BountifulGilbert/Commonwealth City of Redding Arizona Public Service Company City of Lodi,CA O315L Stan Burns and Associates,Inc. Exxon Minerals Company Exxon Coal Exxon Research and Engineering Occidental Petroleum Mobil Research and Development Kennecott Minerals Corporation Santa Fe Coal Corporation Gold Fields Mining Corporation Ranchers Exploration and Development Bennett Lumber Products Spokane Steel Foundry,Inc. Mountain States Telephone Company U.S.Forest Service Bonneville Pacific Corporation Beker Industries Corporation Stauffer Chemical Company Newmont Mines,Ltd. Noranda Exploration,Inc. U.S.Energy Corporation Oxbow Geothermal Company The Sun Valley Company Calpine Corporation John Hancock Mutual Insurance Raft River Rural Electric Coop. Lower Valley Power and Light Lost River Electric Cooperative Fall River Rural Electric Coop. Mt.Wheeler Power Ferry County PUD White River Electric Cooperative Prairie Power Cooperative Bridger Valley Electric Assn.,Inc. Northern California Power Agency City of Santa Clara Plumas-Sierra Rural City of Gillette Imperial Irrigation District Surprise Valley Electric Association City of Idaho Falls Christenson Electric Umatilla Electric Cooperative Price City Utilities Southside Electric Lines,Inc. Petersburg Municipal Electric System Idaho County Light &Power Electric Co-op. TII-99 @L0MeL) IV.SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT WORK PLANS INTRODUCTION This section contains POWER's proposed Scope of Work for the execution of the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study.At the proposal stage,POWER's detailed Work Plans essentially serve as a checklist for project planning and provide POWER's Management Team and the Power Authority with a basis for developing a definitive project approach. For this study,POWER's Project Work Plan is composed of a Project Task Sequence Diagram and complimentary Task Descriptions. e A project specific Task Sequence Diagram is developed and serves as a visual representation of the Project Work Plan for all project participants.The Task Sequence Diagram illustrates the sequential progression of the work,task interactions and interdependencies,Owner review and approval milestones and functions as a compliance checklist during the development of the Task Descriptions,Project Schedule and Project Budget. ¢Project specific Task Descriptions are developed at the Subtask levelandserveasadefinitionofallactivitiesoreventsthatmusttake place or be accomplished in order to complete a specific Task. The Task Sequence Diagrams and Task Descriptions (as well as the Project Schedule,Budget and Status Reports)are numerically coded to facilitate reference and tracking,as described in detail in the Project Management section. «The abbreviation PEI (POWER Engineers,Inc.)beside a Task or Subtask indicates primary POWER responsibility. °The abbreviation APA/PEI beside a Task or Subtask indicates shared responsibility between POWER and the Power Authority., *The abbreviation HC/PEI beside a Task or Subtask indicates primary Hart Crowser responsibility under the overall supervision of POWER personne] as defined in Section II,Management Plan. O315L IV-]@DoUet) *All task activities necessary to provide for a complete process are shown for clarity and completeness.Subtask activities are listed and will be further developed around the Power Authority exigency. °Power Authority review and approval milestones are indicated byflagsontheTaskSequenceDiagram.Power AuthorityparticipationisanintegralcomponentofPOWER's ProjectManagementphilosophyasPOWERrecognizesthevalueof,and encourages Owner participation. Task Outlines POWER's "Task Outlines"are shown on the following pages to provide Power Authority personnel with a summary of our proposed Scope of Work for this study. Task Descriptions and Task Sequence Diagram The rest of this section is composed of our Project Task Descriptions which describe at the subtask level our Project Team's proposed approach for the study.A Project Task Sequence Diagram is placed at the end of this section. UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY STUDY TASK OUTLINES 30.00.00 PROJECT CONTROL (APA/PEI) 30.00.01 Project Supervision (PEI) 30.00.02 Project Status Reports (PEI) 30.00.03 Document and Correspondence Control (PEI) 30.00.04 Clerical Support (PEI) 30.00.05 Proposal Review (APA/PEI) 30.01.00 GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (PEI) 30.01.01 Startup Activities (PEI) ¢Gather and Analyze Existing Data e Investigate Project Site O315L TV-2 eZouer) 30.01.02 30.01.03 30.01.04 30.01.05 30.01.06 O315L Assessment of Resource as it Applies to the Selection Technologies (PEI) «Scaling Potential °H,S and Other Plant Emissions °Materials of Construction Selection Considerations Plant Design Parameters (PEI) Power Outputs Resource Basis Site Selection Degree and Type of Remote Monitoring and Technology Screening Control (Cable,Microwave Civil/Structural Design or VHF Radio Link with Parameters Local Programmable Controllers) Plant Design Life Utilities Weather Design Data One vs.Two Wells Binary Power System (PEI) Module Size Selection and Plant DesignProcessFlowDiagram Plot Plan Electrical One-Line Equipment List Capital,Operating and Maintenance Cost System Descriptionoeeeee@¢#Single-Flash Power System (PEI) Plant Design Process Flow Diagram Plot Pian Electrical One-Line Equipment List Capital and Operating CostSystemDescription Double-Flash Power System (PEI) Plant Design Process Flow Diagram Plot Plan Electrical One-Line Equipment List Capital and Operating Cost System Description IV-3 of Coe) r 30.01.07 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 O315L .08 09 .00 01 02 .03 .04 Hybrid Power System (PEI) e Plant Design Type Selection (Binary with Condensing Turbine vs.Binary with Topping Turbine) Process Flow Diagram Plot Plan Electrical One-Line Equipment List Capital and Operating Cost System Description Total Flow Power System (PEI) Plant Design Process Flow Diagram Plot Plan Electrical One-Line Equipment List Capital and Operating Cost System Description Base Case Diesel Power System (PEI) *Acquire Data From Local Utility System Design ¢Capital and Operating Cost TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ANALYSIS (PEI) Startup Activities (PEI) «Gather and Analyze Existing Data °Investigate Project Site Develop System Requirements (PEI) Transmission Line Generation Substation °Termination Substation e Distribution System Route Selection (PEI) °Alternative Overland Routes °Alternative Underwater Routes Analysis (PEI) e Preliminary Design Cost Estimates Evaluation and Recommendations Iv-4 @Lolet) 30 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. .03. 03 03. 03 03 03 04. 04. 04. 04. 04. 04. 05 05. 05. 05. O315L 00 01 02 .03 .04 .05 00 01 02 03 04 05 .00 01 02 03 SUPPORT FACILITIES ANALYSTS (HC/PEI) Analysis of Existing Data (HC/PEI) Investigate Project Site (HC/PEI) Alternative Siting and Corridors (HC/PEI) Roads,Dock,and Airstrip (HC/PEI) Alternative Construction and Operation (HC/PEI) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,ASSESSMENT AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS CHC/PEI) Review Existing Environmental Information (HC/PEI) Define Key Environmental Issues and Impacts (HC/PEI) Define Mitigation Requirements (HC/PEI) Identify Permit Requirements (HC/PEI) Develop Alternative Proposals for Geothermal Effluent Disposal (PEI) °Injection .Surface Disposal «Secondary Uses DIRECT USE GEOTHERMAL EVALUATION (PET) Startup Activities (PET) *Gather and Analyze Existing Data .Investigate Project Site Identify Use Potential (PEI) ¢Survey Industrial Users of Thermal Energy in the Village for Possible Conversion to Geothermal e Assess District Heating System Potential °Explore New Uses such as Horticulture and Aquaculture Assess Utilization Impacts (PEI) °Evaluate Effects on Resource and/or Well Development Requirements ¢Determine Disposal Options and Environmental Impacts¢Survey Potential for Relocating Generating Plant to Intermediate Level that could Provide Year Round Access as Well as Partial Use of Spent Plant Effluents for Direct Use IV-5 @20Uet 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 05 05. 06. 06. 06 06 06. 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 08. 08 08. O315L .04 05 00 01 02 .03 04 .00 01 .02 .03 .04 .05 06 .O7 00 01 02 Recommended Conceptual Design (PEI) °Prepare Process Flow Diagrams for Selected Options *Compile Capital and Operating Costs Economic Analysis (PEI) e Compare Geothermal Costs to Existing Energy Sources «Summarize Results and Conclusions POWER SYSTEM ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (PEI) Startup Activities (PEI) Present Worth Analysis (PEI) Sensicivity Analysis (PEI) Report Generation (PEI) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (PEI) Overall Recommendation Based on Economic and Environmental Viability (PEI) Type and Size of Geothermal Power System (PEI) Transmission Line Type,Routing and Support Facilities (PEI) Plant and Transmission Line Construction and Operation Support Facilities (PEI) Environmental,Mitigation and-Permitting (PEI) Direct Use Applications (PEI) Economics (PEI) REPORT PREPARATION (APA/PEI) Prepare and Issue Draft Report (PEI) Incorporate APA Comments and Issue Final Report (PEI) IV-6 C20) UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY STUDY TASK DESCRIPTIONS 30.00.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT &CONTROL (APA/PEI) The primary intent and objective of this task and subsequent tasks is the efficient and timely completion of the work through well-planned,scheduled,organized and managed engineering services. Project Control means planning,scheduling,organizing, monitoring cost control,status reporting and managing of the individual services.The implementation of a definitive plan of action to accomplish the completion of the work in a predetermined,logical orderly and timely manner is also the function of Project Control. POWER's project control is the basis of our history of successful projects.Our goals at the outset of every project are to provide the client with a completed project on schedule and within budget. POWER's Project Manager will implement the project management system discussed in Section II to ensure the execution of the Scope of Work and compliance with the procedures developed under the following tasks. 30.00.01 Project Supervision (PEI) The objective of this subtask is to: °Ensure sufficient,competent,experienced personnel adequately trained to manage,supervise and perform all tasks in a timely manner. °Provide on-going maintenance and supervision of al] activities related to project work budgets,schedules, and overall administration/fiscal procedures. 30.00.02 Project Status Reports (PEI) Under this substask the Project Manager will: °Prepare and submit to the Owner monthly Project Status Reports.Summarize the progress of the work,including the services provided by POWER,subcontracted services,costs, work expected to be accomplished in the next month,problems, trends and/or delays and the reason for and actions being taken to bring those areas back on schedule,or budget.The monthly Project Status Reports shall form a permanent part of the project record. O315L 'IV-7 CLO) *Develop a project schedule which shall be continuously updated and,if necessary,redrawn on the first working day of each month or upon issuance of any change order which substantially affects the project schedule.Notification of schedule slippage shall be accomplied by a recovery plan,Subject to the Owner's acceptance,indicatinghow the projectwillbebroughtbackonschedule. 30.00.03 Document and Correspondence Control (PEI) The objective of this subtask will be: °Establish project filing system,manuals and related project organization systems. e To maintain all files of correspondence and _telephone memoranda between the Power Authority,POWER,Hart Crowser, URS Engineers and any other involved parties. e Provide copies of all correspondence between POWER and third parties. e Receive,distribute,track and file all drawings and documents. 30.00.04 Clerical Support (PEI) °The objective of this task is to provide the stenographic and clerical support to the project team to faciliate their communication efforts. 30.00.05 Proposal Review (APA/PEI) POWER's Project Management Team will initiate the proposal review process with Power Authority,at their office,after selection of POWER as engineer.The review will be based on the Power Authority needs as per previous discussions and on major elements included in POWER's Proposal such as Power Authority and POWER obligations,scope of services,terms of payment and deliverables. This Task will involve a comprehensive review,revision (where required)and subsequent approval of the following: °Scope of Work .Project Schedule Project Budget Subsequent to the review and revision of the Scope of Work (Task Descriptions)and the Project Schedule,the man-hour and expense budgets will be reviewed and revised,if required,to reflect changes in the Project Scope.This Task will result in a finalized scope of work,schedule and budget which will be used over the course of the project. O315L IV-8 @Lollet) 30.01.00 GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (PEI) POWER will assess the Unalaska site and resource specific constraints and,based upon these considerations,evaluate various geothermal technologies and design options.Initially, there will be five geothermal energy conversion technologies which will be considered.POWER will conduct a_technology screening study in subtask 30.01.03.The technologies will be ranked and the two lowest ranking systems technologies will be eliminated from further consideration.For the three remaining technologies which pass POWER's initial screening study,a total plant conceptual design and cost estimate will be prepared.This will address the site work,control,maintenance and powerhouse building,equipment supply,production wells and effluent discharge system and all supplies and installation costs associated with them. This task will interface with Task 30.03,Support Facilities Analysis,Task 30.04,Environmental Review Assessment and Permitting Requirements,Task 30.05,Direct Use Geothermal Evaluating and Task 30.02,Transmission System Analysis.Output will be to the power system economic analysis and the findings and recommendations tasks. 30.01.01 Start-Up Activities (PEI) Upon completion of the start-up activities,the responsible engineers will have all available pertinent data collected,be familiar with the project site and be fully prepared to undertake the detailed project tasks. To accomplish this,copies of existing Power Authority and Republic reports and any related maps or charts will be acquired and reviewed.Other potential sources of information such as the USGS,Aleut Corporation,Ounalashka Corporation and City of Unalaska will be contacted to secure additional project related data which they may have. To obtain firsthand knowledge of the project site,a plant process engineer and a civil/structural engineer will travel toUnalaskaIsland,rent a helicopter and review the =area. Alternative plant sites,potential road corridors and pipe routes will be investigated.All portions of the site visit directly related to the project tasks will be video-taped for future reference and entered into the project data bank.Power generation capability,costs and projections will be discussed with the City of Unalaska and private power generators.This trip will be coordinated with POWER's transmission line engineer's site visit to minimize costs. 30.01.02 Assessment of Resource as it Applies to Selection of Technologies (PET) Existing resource data will be reviewed and the potential for carbonate,silica or other scaling problems assessed.Curves of silica concentration versus percent flash and estimated silica ,solubility will be developed as a part of this effort. O315L IV-9Si CDM) The properties of the fluid will be reviewed and the potential for corrosion estimated based on comparisons with similar resources and literature data.Appropriate materials of construction for piping,process vessels,valves,electrical contacts and other related plant equipment will be recommended. The deliverables for this task will be (1)scaling potential estimates for consideration in the technology selection and (2) materials of construction recommendations for the plant design and cost estimate. 30.01.03 Plant Design Parameters (PEI) The plant design parameters task involves addressing a widely varying array of subjects.These subjects have in common the fact that they must be assessed prior to development of the plant designs and form the basis for these designs.The following capsule descriptions outline these items: Plant Power Output -Based on existing load growth data,the future Power Authority authorized load growth report and data acquired from the City of Unalaska and local private generators, the base case power net output of the plant will be determined. This will be used as the basis for the process flow diagrams and capital and operating and maintenance (O&M)cost estimates. Variations from this plant size,for use in the economic and sensitivity analysis,will be factored from this base case. Resource Basis -The resource production rates,thermodynamic and chemical properties will be quantified for use in the plant design. Site Selection -POWER will review the alternate plant sites and select the preferred site.Considerations will be locating level,stable sites and their location in relation to the transmission line,access roads,well site and geothermal effluent disposal sites. Remote Monitoring and Control -POWER will review potential remote monitoring and control systems appropriate for this location and select the system which best meets the needs of the project.A system with remote capabilities may not be selected if an all-weather road is to be built and the plant is to be staffed around-the-clock.The remote system design and selection will be coordinated with the transmission line remote data gathering and control system work. Plant Design Life -To be jointly chosen by the Power Authority and POWER. Utilities -Sources of water for fire water protection,service water and potable water will be identified.Potential methods for disposal of plant and sanitary wastes will be determined. O315L "IV-10 Cr2aulet) Weather Design Data -POWER will research and acquire weather design data from sources such as National Oceanagraphic and Atmospheric Administration and Alaska ASHRAE chapters for use in designing the plant heating and freeze protection systems and plant structures. One versus Two Wells -POWER will evaluate the cost of two smaller wells versus one larger well and the probability of well outages.We will develop a recommendation as to the well size, cost and number for use in the plant design. Technology Screening -POWER will assess reliability,commercial facility operating experience,conversion efficiency and applicability of the technology to the site and resource in question.All probable technologies are under consideration at this point in time and as such are listed in subtasks 30.01.04 through 30.01.08.The technology screening process will rank these technologies and the two with the lowest ranking will be dropped from further considerations. Civil/Structural Design Parameters -Soils data,slope stability and related data are to be acquired from the study authorized by the Power Authority.Snow and wind loading and seismic design criteria will be developed based on ijiocal building codes, insurance carrier requirements and other applicable codes and standards. For a binary power system,a module size will be selected and an overall conceptual plant design performed.This will include mechanical systems definition and selection,site work, electrical interconnect,control system selection and power plant building preliminary design.A capital cost estimate for a complete operating facility,with costs appropriate to the Unalaska site,will be prepared.This estimate will have a "budgetary"level of accuracy (+20-30%).The basis of the Vendor Budget Quotations for Major Equipment Foundations Sketches for Major Equipment Combination of Take-offs and Factored Values for Material °Material Prices from Umalaska or Alaska Sources where Possible;Others Calculated Based on Contiguous U.S.Prices °Alaska Construction Labor and Contractor Costs for Unalaska °Factored Contractor Indirect Costs and Fees An O&M estimate taking into account the operating philosophy (remote vs.local)and historical data from similar plants will be prepared.O&M costs will include labor,consumable supplies, backup power,fuel,maintenance parts,well operating costs and any miscellaneous costs quantified in the course of the estimate preparation such as road maintenance and transportation costs to 30.01.04 Binary Power System (PEI) capital cost will be: e Take-offs from Design Sketches Quantities the plant. O315L IV-11 eDolet) A system description describing the plant systems and their method of operation will be prepared.Documents and drawingswhichwillbepreparedasapartofthissubtaskandincludedin the final report are as follows: Process Flow Diagram with Material and Energy Balance Plot Plan Electrical One-Line Equipment List with Outline Specifications Capital Cost Estimate O&M Cost Estimate System Description 30.01.05 Single-Flash Power System (PEI) Assuming that the single-flash system survives the technology screening,POWER will prepare a conceptual design and cost estimate which has the same deliverables as the previous subtask (please see Subtask 30.01.04 for details).A special consideration for plant design is modularization and provisions for incremental expansion.Most single-flash units are stick built other than modularized.Therefore,when preparing the conceptual design,the major plant systems must be modularized. This will be accomplished by dividing the plant into segments and providing a conceptual design and cost estimate for a skid support system for each segment.Some systems,such as the turbine-generator set and lube oil system,can be specified and purchased from the manufacturer already skid-mounted.For these systems,the budgetary quotation requests will specify that the skid be supplied with the equipment. To provide for incremental expansion certain components,such as the building and well head separator,will be over-sized.This approach will increase the initial capital cost but provide for Flexibility and a lower installation cost if the plant capacity is increased at a later date. 30.01.06 Double-Flash Power System (PEI) The double-flash plant conceptual design and cost estimate will have the same deliverables as Subtask 30.01.04.The general considerations of modularity and incremental expansion are the same as that for the single-flash plant.There is one design departure from use of the standard double-flash plant dual inlet turbine-generator set which will be considered.This is the use of separate,independent high pressure and low.pressure turbine-generators which utilize a common condenser.Although increasing the cost,this will greatly improve the plant availability as turbine-generators are typically the most failure prone major component of a geothermal plant.The cost associated with this approach will be compared with the dual inlet turbine-generator to see if the increased reliability is worth the additional expense. O315L IV-12 epomer) (->) 30.01.07 Hybrid Power System (PEI) The hybrid system will employ a cycle utilizing both a steam turbine-generator set and binary modules.The design and cost estimate deliverables are as specified in Subtask 30.01.04.One major cycle selection consideration for this subtask is whether or not to employ a standard condensing turbine with associated condenser and non-condensable gas removal equipment or a non-condensing turbine which exhausts to a binary module's Superheater and vaporizer.The binary unit would condense the steam above atmospheric pressure and vent the non-condensables without the need for a non-condensable gas removal system.The liquid stream from the wellhead separator would be utilized by feeding it to a separate binary module.The potential for freezing problems with this design would be greatly reduced as there would be no air-cooled condenser exposed to ambient conditions.However,the non-condensing turbine/binary system will be somewhat less efficient.Both systems will be evaluated and one selected as the basis for the conceptual design and cost estimate. 30.01.08 Total-Flow Power System (PEI) The total-flow system will also have a conceptual design and cost estimate with deliverables as defined in Subtask 30.01.04.This system may not emerge from the technical screening study as a viable technology due to it's limited commercial operating experience.The only unit utilizing this technology is the Desert Peak Plant in Nevada.There have been some operating problems with this unit.Whether or not the problems have been corrected and the technology is considered proven will be ascertained during the screening study. 30.01.09 Base Case Diesel Power System (PEI) The base case diesel generation system capital and O&M costs for use in the economic analysis will be developed in this subtask. If estimates for future additional generation are required,POWER will base them on updated costs from the City of Unalaska for their diesel generation equipment.The O&M costs will also be based on their experience.Fuel prices,a major component of these costs will have a range of estimates prepared and used in the sensitivity portion of the economic analysis.Information on capital and O&M costs will be solicited from private generators and considered when preparing the base case generation costs. If the data acquired by POWER from these sources is deficient, then sufficient conceptual design and cost estimating work will be performed to provide suitable input for the economic model. 30.02.00 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ANALYSIS (PEI) The purpose of this task is to determine the most feasibletransmissionlinesystemrequirementsandrouteto_transportpowerfromtheproposedgeothermalplanttothecommunities O315L [V-13 - )ezouer) of Dutch Harbor and Unalaska.Many factors will be considered, including construction costs,environmental considerations, maintenance and operations,terrain,geologic features,climatic conditions,reliability,load growth projections,and methods of interconnection into the Unalaska Municipal Power System,to name a few. The task involves the gathering and analysis of existing data which includes a field investigation of the project site by a POWER transmission engineer;a determination of transmission system requirements including the line itself,a generation step-up substation,the termination substation,and the distribution systems serving Dutch Harbor and Unalaska;the selection of the most feasible route for the line including both alternative overland and underwater routes;and a final analysis which involves the development of preliminary design,the preparation of cost estimates for those designs,and a final recommendation to the Power Authority for the overall transmission system. 30.02.01 Start-Up Activities (PEI) The objective of Start-Up Activities is to gather,review,and analyze the existing information that pertains to the transmission system.This will entail a visit to Unalaska to view the project site firsthand and to gather any additional information necessary to determine and evaluate prospective transmission line routes,and methods of interconnection to the City of Unalaska's subtransmission system.We will also identify any additional concerns which must be addressed in_the transmission system analysis. Gather and Analyze Existing Data: POWER will review existing studies,maps,charts,and other datathathadbeenpreviouslypreparedandarerelevantto_thetransmissionsystemdesignandrouteselection.We will consult with the Power Authority to assure that all relevant reports and information items are reviewed to avoid duplication of effort and to minimize cost.Reports and information items expected to be utilized and agencies expected to be consulted for this task are listed below: e "Engineering Geologic Feasibility Study for the ProposedMakushinGeothermalFieldPowerFacility,Unalaska Island" Cin preparation by Alaska DNR) Nautical Charts Existing Topographical Mapping U.S.Army Corp.of Engineers U.S.Department of Commerence,National Oceanographic °and Atmospheric Administration,National Marine Fishery Service Alaska Department of Fish and Game City of Unalaska Municipal Utility Alaska Power Authority Previous Studies and Reports Prepared for Alaska Power Authority O315L Iv-14 C LULL 30.02.02 °Alaska Department of Natural Resources e Land Ownership and Status from Public Records °Existing Agreements Between Alaska Power Authority and Native Corporations for Power Line Routing Bathymetric Information on Potential Routes Studies Relating to Fisheries on Unalaska Bay Studies Relating to Tidal Conditions Experience and Observations of Local Divers Relating to Bottom Conditions and Currents in Unalaska Bayoe@@ Upon review of the information gathered in this process,a detailed plan will be formulated to identify what additionalinformationmustbedevelopedandhowto.proceed =most expeditously and effectively in developing the transmission system analysis. Investigate Project Site: The scheduling of the project dictates that the field investigation will have to occur in September 1986.From our conversations with various entities that have local knowledge of Unalaska,it would be prohibitive to perform a_é field investigation of the project in the winter and expect to achieve the desired results in an-economical manner.Therefore,all data acquisition and field investigations will run concurrently.But any information that could be acquired prior to the fieldinvestigationswillbereviewedandanalyzedpriortotheactual field trip. The purpose of this on-site investigation will be to identify and evaluate prospective transmission routes,confirm existing data that was gathered in the previous step,review and establish sites for substations and discuss with local power system engineers the details of interconnection with their systems.At this point POWER will interface with its principal subcontractor, Hart Crowser,concerning the environmental studies and permitting required for the transmission line.This transmission system field.investigation effort would be fully coordinated with the field investigation effort of those involved studying the geothermal power plant itself,including POWER's generation andgeothermalexpertsandHartCrowser.The result will be anintegratedanalysisefforttooptimizetheeconomic,environmental and operational concerns for the entire geothermal power supply system.Upon completion of the project siteinvestigation,information gathered would be assembled andreviewedalongwiththeexistingdata,and a detailed plan for proceeding with the rest of the study would be developed. System Requirements (PEI) O315L The objective of this task is to determine the optimumtransmissionsystemparameters.This task would be carried onconcurrentwithandwillinteractwithtask30.02.03,Route Selection.The major elements of this task include selection of IV-15 ©20M) O315L transmission voltage,conductor type and size;structure type and loading conditions for overhead lines;cable type,conductor size,and installation methods for submarine and/or underground cable;configuration and requirements for the generation substation and its related circuit breakers,transformers and protective relaying at the generation site;configuration of the substation or switchgear and its related transformers (Cif required),circuit breakers,and protective relaying at the point of interconnection to the City of Unalaska subtransmission system;and identification of any modifications or changes in the physical plant or operating practices which would be necessary for delivery of power from the geothermal generating station into the City of Unalaska's existing subtransmission system.The City of Unalaska has an underground 34.5kV subtransmission system.We will give careful consideration to utilizing 34.5kV transmission to minimize the cost of and simplify the interconnection to the City of Unalaska's system.Initial review indicates a 34.5kV transmission line may prove feasible. Transmission Line: POWER will review load projections and geothermal power plant construction projections to determine maximum line loading, initial line loading,and the probable timing of increases in line loading.We will evaluate voltage drop at maximum line loading for various combinations of transmission line voltage and conductor size to determine which combinations will meet minimum requirements at maximum loading conditions.POWER will perform loss analysis at initial,and maximum intermediate loading conditions,prepare preliminary cost estimates for transmission line and substation construction,perform a preliminary economic analysis taking into account cost of construction and cost of losses,and perform a preliminary optimization to select the combination of transmission line voltage and the conductor size. We will review potential routes and available meterological information to determine line design parameters such as extreme loading conditions,loading zone,and allowances for deep snow fall.POWER will consider overhead transmission lines, underground transmission lines,and submersible cables.We will determine optimum voltage and conductor size for overhead, underground,and submersible transmission and compare relative costs to determine which type or combination of types warrants further analysis. Generation Substation: In coordination with the development of transmission system requirements and the geothermal power plant preliminary design, POWER will develop the functional requirements for the substation to interconnect the transmission line to the generation plant. POWER will develop a single line diagram and identify the major items of equipment.We will develop relaying requirements to properly interface with the protective relaying on the generation IV-16 CLM) plant and the termination substation or switchgear which interconnects the transmission line to the existing subtransmission system serving at Unalaska and Dutch Harbor.We will intergrate SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) requirements for the substation with the control and communications systems developed for the the geothermal generation plant.This substation will be located at or very near the geothermal generation plant. Termination Substation or Switchgear: In coordination with the development of transmission system requirements and the generation substation preliminary design, POWER will develop the functional requirements for the substation or switchgear to interconnect the transmission line to the City of Unalaska subtransmisston system.We will develop a single line diagram and identify major items of equipment.Finally,we will develop relaying requirements to properly interface with theprotectiverelayingonthesubtransmissionsystemand_the generation substation. Subtransmission System: POWER will perform a cursory review of the distribution system serving Unalaska and Dutch Harbor to determine where electrical energy from the geothermal power plant could be delivered,and what modifications,if any,must be made to the subtransmission system to accept power from the geothermal power plant.POWER will coordinate and work with the local utility to determine preferred sites and configurations for the switchgear or substation required for interconnection to the subtransmission system.We will make recommendations as to further studies and/or capital construction required to accomodate the power being provided by geothermal power plant.The City of Unalaska has an existing 34.5kV subtransmission system.It is anticipated this system will prove adequate,with little or no modification, to accept power from the generation plant. 30.02.03 Route Selection (PEI) The purpose of this task is the identification and selection of the preferred line routing corridors for the transmission line. Major elements include identification of avoidance areas,eitherastheresultofphysicalconstraints,land use conflicts, environmental constraints,or archaeological restrictions;determination and evaluation of the prospective transmission line corridors outside of the avoidance areas;and plotting corridors on a route map for detailed considerations in the evaluation and recommendations phase. Alternative Overland Routes: POWER will develop alternative overland routes concurrently with underwater submarine cable routes.We will develop avoidance areas for the power line based upon environmental considerations previously developed or to be developed by our subcontractor, O315L IV-17 CLO) Hart Crowser.Avoidance areas will also be based on existing or planned land use;Power Authority agreements with native corporations;constraints of interested state and "federal entities;terrain which prohibits construction;archeological sites;and other geological features such as stream beds which would prohibit or make impractical the construction,operation and maintenance of the transmission line.POWER will plot the areas of avoidance on a suitably scaled topographical map to show graphically those areas remaining for power line construction. Within those areas remaining for power line construction,we will identify those areas which would require mitigation efforts or special design and construction techniques,such as raptor protected structure design or helicoptor construction. At this point,POWER will select the preferred line route corridors.Preferred line route corridors will be plotted on the route map.Land surveys to determine exact field location of the corridor and selection of the line centerlne within the corridor will be accomplished in the design phase of the project and are not included.We will coordinate preferred route termination points with available cable laying areas for submersible cable alternatives.In selecting preferred line route corridors,we will consider ease of construction,access for maintenance, reliability,construction cost,maintenance cost,mitigation efforts to protect the environment (particularly salmon spawning areas),visual impact and special design requirements (including avalanche areas,slope stability,volcanic hazard areas,glacial hazard areas,etc.) Alternative Underwater Routes: In this task POWER will utilize its subcontractor,URS Engineers, to provide oceanographic expertise in the assessments of bottom, tidal,sedimentation and other conditions in the marine environment affecting the cable installation,operation,and reliability. Utilizing existing data we will determine avoidance areas based upon Corps of Engineers requirements,underwater topography, bottom condition,existing cable locations,and fishing and navigational uses.We will then plot them on a map to appropriate scale.We will choose alternative routes incoordinationwiththefeasiblebeachingpointsfor_thesubmersiblecabletointertiewithoverheadtransmission facilities taking into account factors which will effect the cost of the submersible cable installation such as water depth,length of route,currents,tidal effects,etc.We will develop preferred underwater routes for submersible cable.Preferredlineroutecorridorswillbeplottedontheroute=map.Bathymetric and land surveys to determine the exact fieldlocationofthecorridorandselectionofthelinecenterline within the corridor will be accomplished in the design phase of the project and are not included in this proposal.The basicdataforthegeologicconsiderationsoflineroutingwillbe contained in the "Engineering Geologic Feasility Study for the O315L IV-18 CLM) Proposed Makushin Geothermal Field Power Facility,Unalaska Island"currently under preparation for the Alaska Department of Natural Resources.Other sources of information,such as nautical charts,previous studies and experiences of local divers and port authorities will be used to supplement information contained in the Alaska DNR report. 30.02.04 Analysis (PEI) The objective of this task is (1)to develop preliminary designs based upon information developed in the route selection and transmission system requirements tasks;(2)to prepare cost estimates for the preliminary designs and preferred alternative line routes;and (3)to evaluate the costs and other factors pertaining to the desirability of the alternative designs and routes in order to prepare recommendations for the transmission line and substation requirements for this project. Preliminary Design: Utilizing information developed in the route selection and system requirements tasks,POWER will generate preliminary designs for the transmission line,generation substation,termination substation or switchgear,and itemize modifications which may be required for the existing City of Unalaska subtransmission system.As a minimum,POWER will develop single line diagrams and summary descriptions of major equipment for the generation substation and termination substation or switchgear.We will establish interconnection points and requirements for interconnection to the existing subtransmission system.We will develop summary descriptions for the major apparatus in the termination and generation substations.We will develop proposed overhead transmission line designs including structure families, base pole heights and classes,conductor size and type,anchoring,and major elements of construction such =asavailabilityofaccessandanyspecialmitigationrequirements. For submersible cable,we will determine the optimum cable construction and type taking into account depth of water, current,length of run,voltage,conductor size and material, bottom condition,and other factors.Preliminary design will include insulation type (oil filled or solid dielectric), insulation level,oil reservoir requirements monitoring and alarms (for oil filled cable),bundling (three conductors in one cable vs one conductor per cable),number of cables to be laid, cable spacing if separate cables are used,trenching or other physical protection reqirements,termination requirements,oi] reservoir requirements for oil filled cable,and armoring requirements.It is expected,due to the relatively low voltagerequiredforthistransmissionline,that solid dielectric cable will prove attractive. If justified by the preliminary cost estimates prepared in theSystemRequirementstaskorbyotheruniqueprojectrequirements,wes will develop the optimum undergroundtransmissioncableconstructionandtypetakingintoaccount 0315L IV-19 eL0Mef) installation method (direct burial vs conduit),voltage,conductor size,length of run,and other factors.Preliminarydesignwillincludeinsulationtype(oil filled or solid dielectric),insulation level,concentric neutral or shield requirements,termination methods,method of installation,and requirements for oil reservoirs and their associated monitoring and alarm functions for oi]filled cables.Should underground cable be used,it is expected that solid dielectric insulation will be recommended as a result of the relatively low voltage required for this line. Cost Estimates: Utilizing the preliminary design information,POWER will generate cost estimates for transmission lines on alternative routes,and on the termination and generation substations.We will utilize a combination of vendor quotations on equipment and material, construction labor costs from recent jobs,material costs from recent jobs,and contractor estimates of construction labor costs. Evaluation and Recommendations: Finally,POWER will evaluate alternative routes and alternative substation designs based on cost estimates for construction, reliability,and operational considerations of the final system. We will develop recommendations for the transmission.line, generation substation and termination substation designs.These recommendations will be included in the final report. 30.03.00 SUPPORT FACILITIES ANALYSIS (HC/PEI) The purpose of this task is to analyze existing data;perform project site reconnaissance;identify and evaluate alternative siting and corridors;access the project requirements for roads, docks and airstrips;and develop alternative schemes for the construction and operation transportation and access systems. Each of these items are further detailed in the subtask descriptions that follows.These subtasks outline the scope of work anticipated to adequately access the need of support facilities required for this project. 30.03.01 Analysis of Existing Data (HC/PEIL) This work will initially include a detailed review of the existing topography and air photos plus the data gathered by the Department of Natural Resources in their 1986 summer field program.In addition,the location of all existing facilities such as the dock,airstrip,and road at Driftwood Bay,as well as the existing airstrip of Broad Bay,will be identified and maps prepared identifying known existing facilities.The original military roads constructed in the area will be identified on air photos so that field reconnaissance can identify them. O315L "IV-20 @2aler_) 30.03.02 Investigate Project Site (HC/PEI) 30.03.03 A site visit will be conducted to assess actual access corridors and to match DNR data with "on-the-ground"conditions.This site reconnaissance will be conducted by a two-person Hart Crowser team from the Anchorage office.In addition to notes taken on the field trip,a video camera will be utilized to film all of the impacted corridors including potential access routes,plant sites and transmission line corridors.The helicopter capacity for the field trip will be four passengers and will include other representatives of the project team.Helicopter support will be provided by Maritime Helicopters located in Dutch Harbor.All existing facilities such as docks and airstrips at Driftwood Bay and Broad Bay will be examined,and any upgrading of facilities to support future plant construction will be identified.The original military roads in both valleys will be flown to determine whether these original alignments,or these alignments with some variation,would be suitable access routes. Alternative Siting and Corridors (HC/PEI) 30.03.04 There are essentially two access corridors to the geothermal plant site.One corridor is from Broad Bay up the Makushin Valley,the second from Driftwood Bay to the north.Construction of the plant will require dock or airstrip facilities at either location and possibly an access raad to the plant site.Some facilities already exist at the Driftwood Bay location. There are several alternatives to meeting the construction and operational requirements at the plant site.Each will be examined relative to cost,environmental impacts and operational constraints. The alternatives fall into three categories: 1.No New Access -Helicopter Only 2.Dock and Airstrip -Helicopter to Site 3.Dock,Airstrip and Access Roads Alternative 1 plus Alternatives 2 and 3 applied to both the Makushin Valley Corridor and the Driftwood Bay Corridor will be evaluated.Alternative 2 is available to the Driftwood Bay site at the present time. O315L Roads,Dock and Airstrip (HC/PEI) An assessment will be made of the actual project needs and the additional construction and maintenance cost which would result from not having an actual road to the site from a dock located at either Driftwood Bay or Broad Bay.As previously stated,it is possible that the project may be constructed from either dock orairstripateitherlocationwithorwithoutaroadtothesite. IV-2] C20) 30.03.05 Alternative Construction and Operation (HC/PEI) Working closely with the plant design team,alternative schemes will be developed for the construction and operation transportation and access system.All of the alternatives will be affected by actual plant location and operational needs.At the present time,there are several clear alternatives. 1.Construction and operational access by helicopter only with equipment movement to either existing airstrips or docks. 2.New docks,refurbished airstrips,and staging areas at either Broad Bay or Driftwood Bay with all construction and operations by helicopter. 3.Docks,airstrips and staging areas at Broad Bay or Driftwood Bay with an access road to the site for construction but maintained only in the summer. 4.All-weather road to the plant site combined with the facilities under Alternative 3.This alternative requires more equipment storage and maintenance facilities at the staging area but may reduce other operational costs depending on the plant location and the frequency of travel needed. When the study of the alternative routes are considered,the work done under Task 4,Environmental Concerns,will be addressed with regard to mitigation and minimizing impacts,particularly on fisheries resources. One possible solution to be examined in detail is to bring all construction-related equipment and materials to the Driftwood Bay area and develop a construction staging area.A road suitable for construction access would be built to the plant site which would allow actual construction costs to be lower using the combination of barge and road access to the plant.The road would be minimum standard,single-lane with grades as steep as hauling equipment will allow.This would afford a_low-cost access which should offset higher helicopter-only construction costs.This access could then be used seasonally (with maintenance)for plant maintenance work.Operational access would be by helicopter assuming it was for maintenance purposes only. 30.04.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,ASSESSMENT AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS CHC/PEI) The purpose of this task is to evaluate potential environmental concerns associated with project development,assess the feasibility and costs of various mitigaton options,and determine the costs and schedules for obtaining the necessary permits and regulatory approvals.As instructed in the RFP,this task will also include the development of alternative proposals for geothermal effluent disposal. O315L IV-22 DWE) 30.04.01 Review Existing Environmental Information (HC/PEI) Task 4 will be accomplished primarily through the use of previously collected environmental information.We will obtain this information from various environmental reports prepared for other projects in the vicinity,from coastal zone and other resource planning documents,from results of summer (1986)field Surveys conducted by the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys (DGGS)and Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G),and from direct communications with personnel from various local,state and federal resource agencies.We will also consult more general references related to the environmental impacts of geothermal development,such as the following: °Environmental Impact of Geothermal Developments,R.G.Bowen, 1973. °Effects of Geothermal Energy Development on Fish and Wildlife,U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,1978. e Pollution Perspective for Geothermal Energy Development,U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,1978. °FEIS of the Island Park Geothermal Area,U.S.Forest Service, 1980. The ongoing DGGS survey will be reviewed for information on surface water characteristics,including drainage,flow rates, and water quality,and on archeology.The stream data will be especially important for predictive modeling of chemical andthermalimpactsfromeffluentdisposal.The archeological data will be valuable because of the area's importance to exploration and trade during the Russian occupation of the 18th and 19th centuries,the Klondike and Nome gold rushes,and World War II activities.Relative to the latter activity,we will also consult with the Corps of Engineers for information on prior military activities and future site clean-up plans. The ongoing ADF&G study will be valuable in assessing theimportanceofvariousaquatichabitatstothesalmonfisherycenteredatDutchHarbor.With this information in hand we will estimate the timing and magnitude of salmon spawning and rearing activity at various stream reaches and,in conjunction with hydraulic modeling,will predict fishery impacts. Finally,we will review all available maps and aerial photos oftheprojectarea.Emphasis will be placed on the video tapedsitereconnaissancetobeconductedbythePOWEREngineers/Hart Crowser team during early fall,1986.From this video tape,wewillnotevegetationandsoilscharacteristics,stream drainagesandsubstrates,wetlands,important wildlife habitats,aesthetic qualities,and potential cultural resource site locations. 0315L IV-23 CLM) (-> 30.04.02 Define Key Environmental Issues and Impacts (HC/PEI) The information on existing environmental conditions obtained during Subtask O1 will be compared to the locations of proposed and alternate construction and operational activities.These areas Of potential impact would include,at minimum,the following: .Construction Staging Areas °Power Plant Site °Access Road °Transmission Route Receiving Waters for Effluent Discharge Within each impact area,the important environmental resources will be defined.Water quality and salmon reproduction are expected to be issues of major concern associated with the access road and effluent discharge.Development of transmission line facilities may affect aesthetic qualities.Cultural resources could be affected at any locations of ground disturbing activity. We will assess the magnitude of potential effects both qualitatively and quantitatively.Effects on cultural resources, aesthetics,land use and other human elements will be addressed in a qualitative way based on our professional judgement and the expressed concerns of resources agencies and the general public. As allowed by the available data,effects on surface water characteristics and salmon populations will be predicted through computer modeling.Where the data base is incomplete,we will make a range of assumptions based on experience in comparable environments,and we will calculate a range of effects on water quality (using dilution and temperature gradient models)and on fish (based on published data on mortality and avoidance responses).Projected changes in salmon reproduction can then be used to estimate economic effects on the commercial fishery. 30.04.03 Define Mitigation Requirements (HC/PEI) For these resources which could be significantly and adversely affected by project developments,we will evaluate mitigation requirements.In some cases,specific mitigation measures could be required by regulation (e.g.,to satisfy water quality standards),although in most cases,acceptable mitigation programs will have to be developed subjectively in consultation with resource agencies,landowners,and others.As appropriate, such'references on mitigaion as Pollution Control Guidance for Geothermal Energy Development (EPA,1978)will be consulted. For each type of impact,we will identify the types of required or recommended mitigation,the regulation or precedents which Support such mitigation,and their estimated costs and schedules. For protection of the salmon resource,mitigation may include: restrictions on timing of specific constructon activities to protect sensitive life stages or to avoid activity during migration or spawning;limitations on withdrawals of water from streams;transport of waste materials to approved sites distant 0315L IV-24 ©DOE) from the construction site;preparation and implementation of detailed contaminant spill prevention and counter-measure plans; revegetation of disturbed areas to minimize erosion during runoff;restrictions on sport fishing on-site;and use of upland sand and gravel sources to avoid extractions from river beds. Information on the success of mitigation measures employed in the past in similar situations will be obtained from Habitat Division Staff of ADF&G in Anchorage and from staff at the Alaska Departments of Environmental Conservation and Natural Resources. Possible measures to mitigate water resources impacts include alternative culvert designs,sizes,and seasons of placement,and soil stabilization techniques to reduce run-off and sedimentation effects.If water supply for construction crews is a potential problem,alternative sources may have to be evaluated. Development of a specific cultural resources mitigation program will depend on the assessment of site significance.Possible mitigation measures include facility siting to avoid significant sites,selected data recovery measures,and a cultural awareness training program for project personnel.It is probable that the APA will be required to conduct additional cultural resources investigations and develop site-specific mitigation measures to meet requirements established under the Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended),once facilities have been sited and construction details are known. For each of these mitigation programs,we will prepare cost estimates,including field,office and laboratory labor hours plus other direct costs.We will also provide scheduleinformation,including the duration of each program =and acceptable seasons for survey. 30.04.04 Identify Permit Requirements (HC/PEI) A variety of permits and regulatory approvals will be required for the Unalaska Geothermal Project.Many of these are minor permits or are not related to environmental issues.However,some of the environmental permits could be significant in terms of the time and costs involved in review and approval of the permit application and in meeting permit stipulations. The most significant federal approval could be the Corps of Engineers Section 10/404 permit for the placement of structures in navigable waters or for dredge and fill activities in watersoftheUnitedStates.If such a permit is needed,the Corps will also require the applicant to obtain a 401 Water Quality Certification from the state.If the Corps finds during the public notice period that impacts are potentially significant,they could also require that a NEPA Environmental ImpactStatement(EIS)be prepared for this project.Because the preparation and public review of such a document could consume 12 O315L IV-25 e Dole) to 24 months,it will be important to evaluate this matter earlyinprojectplanning.It may be possible to preclude significant impacts and,thus,the need for an EIS by either modifying the project design or agreeing to certain mitigation measures;with the information we will provide on costs of both mitigation and EIS preparaton,the APA can make informed decisions about such trade-offs. The most critical state permits are likely to be the Anadromous Fish Protection Permit issued by ADF&G and the Wastewater Disposal Permit issued by DEC.We will consult with both agencies about possible permit stipulations and acceptable mitigation programs. Our primary source of information will be the Alaska Directory of Permits (1985 edition)supplemented by personal communications to verify that information.We will summarize the results of this subtask into a table which shows,by project activity and location,the permit or approval required,the issuing agency, permit application requirements,and expected permit stipulations. 30.04.05 Develop Alternative Proposals for Geothermal Effluent Disposal (PET) Alternative methods of disposal of the geothermal effluent will be researched and those which,based on preliminary investigations,are suitable for this project will be addressed in more detail.For those suitable alternatives,capital, operating and maintenance costs will be developed and used as input to the economic analysis. The two major effluent rejection methods are injection and surface disposal.With injection,no negative environmental impacts are anticipated as phenomenon such as mounding and Subsidence which may be associated with fluid injection and withdrawal do not normally occur in an area with extensive volcanics.There may,however,be process related problems such as silica scaling and short circuiting between the injection well and the production well.The probability of occurence and potential impact of these items on the total system operation will be considered. Surface disposal may thermally or chemically degrade the surface water resources.Thermal impacts may be mitigated by cooling the effluent with cooling ponds prior to discharge.Another method would be to develop a surface or shallow ground water source and blend it with the geothermal effluent to cool it.Blending may also be used to mitigate the potential negative impacts on the water chemistry of the surface waters if a suitable high quality input water source can be found.Methods for ""desalinating"the geothermal effluent such as distillation and jon exchange are not economically viable and will not be considered for inclusion as a mitigation measure.Discharge of the effluent to a different drainage than the Makushin where the potential for negative impact is less may be economically and environmentally feasible O315L IV 26 Cr2allet) and will be addressed.This may be done by siting the plant remote from the resource or by piping the effluent to the disposal point with cross country piping.The impact of the selection of a disposal method on the plant siting will be coordinated with the siting study done as a part of the plant design parameters subtask. For the viable effluent disposal methods,capital,operating and maintenance costs will be developed.These will be used as inputs to the economic analysis and sensitivity study to determine their impacts on the overall project feasibility. To accomplish the goals of this task,the effluent quantities and thermal and chemical quality determined in Task 30.01.00, Geothermal Systems Assessment,must be complete.The environmental restrictions and considerations for use in this alternatives analysis for the effluent disposal will be developed in preceding Subtasks 30.04.01,30.04.02,30.04.03 and 30.04.04. Task deliverables include a report on the alternative effluent disposal methods and their associated costs. 30.05.00 DIRECT USE GEOTHERMAL EVALUATION (PEI) The performance of this task will entail an investigation into the feasibility of potential direct uses for the geothermal power plant liquid effluent and for shallow geothermal resources in the Makushin Valley.A team of U.S.G.S.researchers is exploring the nature and extent of Makushin Valley geothermal resources this summer,and their findings will contribute greatly to further research into the possible use of these geothermal resources for direct use. The following subtasks detail the process by which POWER will assess the potential for the direct use of geothermal energy at the well site and plant sites,in the Makushin Valley and within the Unalaska/Dutch Harbor area. 30.05.01 Startup Activities (PED Gather and Analyze Existing Data -The goal of this task is obvious,and of particular importance will be the collection and analysis of data resulting from the U.S.G.S.research mentioned above.This data will be used in conjunction with otherinformationcurrentlyavailable. Investigate Project Site -This on-site investigation will be performed in conjunction with the above to gather informationpertinenttopossibledirectuseofliquidgeothermaleffluentattheplantsiteandthesurroundingarea.This work will be done concurrently with the geothermal resource assessment site investigation of Subtask 30.01. O315L 'TV-27 CLE) (- 30.05.02 Identify Use Potential (PEI) 30.05.03 This subtask will explore three areas of potential direct use: village industrial and processing facilities,community space and water heating,and new and innovative applications. Industrial and Processing -While it is unlikely that liquid effluent from the well site could be economically piped to the Dutch Harbor area for industrial and processing use,it is more conceivable that hot water from a shallow valley source could be used by fish processing or other plants for both heating and cooling (through an absorption cooling process).Potential users will be surveyed and their individual and collective needs defined. Assess District Heating Potential -POWER personne!will assess the possibilities for the use of geothermal fluid for district and water heating in the village communities and outlying areas. Explore New Uses -Novel direct uses for geothermally heated fluid include the following: e Horticulture -greenhouse and soil heating. e Aquaculture -the growth of fish and aquatic organisms. e Surface Heating -heating roads,airstrips or similar applications for snow and ice removal. e Recreation -swimming and soaking pools. Waste Treatment -for use in maintaining the temperature of anaerobic beds used for digestion of sewage and other wastes such as fish offal. These and other concepts will be researched to ensure even obscure potential uses are considered. Assess Utilization Impacts (PEI) 30.05.04 This subtask will result in:(1)an evaluation of potential effects of direct use on resource and/or well development;(2)a determination of liquid geothermal effluent disposal options and associated environmental impacts (this portion of this subtask will interact with the environmental and effluent disposal portions of Task 30.04);and (3)an investigation into the affect on the potential direct use alternatives of locating the generating plant to an intermediate level affording year-round access and the direct use of geothermal effluents. Recommended Conceptual Design (PEI) O375L The performance of this subtask is dependent upon whether the direct use of shallow and/or spent geothermal fluids is deemed a viable option during the investigations above.If one or more conceptual designs are to be recommended,a process flow diagram will be prepared for each option.Additionally,POWER will provide a compilation of estimated capital and operating costs for each option. IV-28 C20) (-) 30.05.05 Economic Analysis (PEI) The results of this subtask will compare potentially reasonable options for the direct use of geothermal fluids with the costs of existing energy supplies.Moreover,the results of the comparison will be summarized and conclusions presented on the nature of the most efficient and cost effective energy supply. 30.06.00 POWER SYSTEM ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (PEI) The purpose of this task is to perform detailed life-cycle cost analyses of power system alternatives., 30.06.01 Start-up Activities (PEI) The objective of this subtask is to gather review,and reduce in an efficient manner all the information necessary to commence the life-cycle cost economic analyses.Information identified in the RFP to be supplied by the Power Authority is geologic and hydrologic,load forecasts,and power marketing analyses.POWER assumes that this information will identify a single high, medium,and low end-use load growth scenario with results expressed in demand and energy terms per each year of the period to be analyzed.Additional materials and information which would necessarily be provided by the Power Authority will be identified.Information which must be obtained other than from the Power Authority will also be identified,gathered,reviewed, and reduced.Upon receipt of all materials and information,it will be processed as detailed in this section. Good communications between the Power Authority and POWER will enhance the results of the Study.Primary channels and methods for communication between concerned parties will be established to ensure this goal. Task Prerequisites: °Notice to Proceed Task Deliverables: e Necessary Information Identified by POWER Information Assembled and Forwarded by Power Authority ¢Other Information 30.06.02 Present Worth Analysis (PEI) Screened primary facility and ancillary costs relative togeneration,transmission,and substation developed previously intheStudywillbecombinedintopossiblebestplansofserviceforlife-cycle present worth analysis.Other analysis criteriawillbeselectedandalldatainputtoacomputermodelfor calculation.In addition to herein developed alternatives,the "as is"diesel alternative will be addressed;no hydroelectric generation will be investigated. 0315L IV-29os @ Dalel ) 30.06.03 Task Prerequisites: Information provided by Power Authority e Other Information Task Deliverables: °Present Worth Analysis Sensitivity Analysis (PEI) 30.06.04 Sensitivity refers to the relationship between the relative change in forecast of some element of an economic analysis and the measure of attractiveness of an alternative.Estimates for some elements may be varied over a wide range of values and not affect the ranking of an alternative;a small change in another element estimate could cause a significant shift.Such elements would be said to be insensitive and sensitive,respectively.In this analysis we will investigate sensitivity of alternatives to such factors as discount rates,fuel escalation rates,capital cost estimates,and load growth.A reasonable variance from the originally selected values for the above mentioned areas will be re-inputted to the computer model and run to reassess ranking. Total combined scenarios anticipated to be run for present worth and sensitivity analysis is 30. Task Prerequisites: °Present Worth Analysis ¢Sensitivity areas «Sensitivity values Task Deliverables: «Sensitivity Analysis Report Generation (PEI) O315L The results of the present worth and sensitivity analyses will be examined,synthesized,and consolidated into report form as a section of the overall Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study. Task Prerequisites: e Present Worth Analysis e §«Sensitivity Analysis Task Deliverables: e Economic Analysis section of the report TV-30 COU) 30.07.00 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (PEI) The objective of this task will be to consolidate and correlate the findings of the many facets of POWER's feasibility study and to develop recommendations concerning the development of the Mt. Makushin geothermal resource and the types of facilities necessary to develop power and transport it to the Unalaska/Dutch Harbor area. 30.07.01 Overall]Recommendation Based on Economic and Environmental Suitability (PEI) An overall recommendation concerning the Unalaska Geothermal Project will be formulated through consideration of the parameters and recommendations developed under each of the following subtask headings.It will address the preferred course of action based on the technical feasibility,environmental compatibility and economic viability.Recommendations and a schedule for future Unalaska resource development will be provided if the geothermal option is viable. 30.07.02 Type and Size of Geothermal Power System (PEI) This subtask will present the findings of the analysis, conceptual designs and cost estimates of the geothermal power systems potentially suited to this resource and site.The energy conversion systems chosen for this detailed analysis will be selected by a technology screening study which will be conducted as a part of the geothermal systems assessment subtask. 30.07.03 Transmission Line Type,Routing and Support Facilities (PEI) Following a determination of an appropriate plant site,potential generation levels,and access and environmental parameters, POWER's Transmission and Distribution staff will develop a recommendation for transmission line size,type,cost and routing including a description of associated support facilities in thetransmissionlinesubtask.The results of that work will be presented in this subtask. 30.07.04 Plant and Tranmission Line Construction and Operation Support Facilities (PEI) In this subtask a summary will be provided of the estimates and recommendations on the size,location and type of roads,dock, airstrips and related facilities and manpower necessary to support both the construction and operation of the projected plant and transmission installations. 30.07.05 Environmental,Mitigation and Permitting (PEI) The results from the subtask on environmental assessments, mitigation and permitting will be presented in this three-partsubtask.This work will primarily be performed by Hart-Crowser personnel under the direction of POWER's Project Engineer.The O315L IV-3] @Z0MeL) first part will be the compilation and correlation of the results of detailed investigations into environmental impacts of plant construction and operation,liquid effluent disposal,access roads,and transmission facilities construction. Part two will be MHart-Crowser's recommendations for the mitigation of the potential environmental impacts discerned above coupled with with detailed cost estimates for each mitigation measure. Part three will identify and list the host of permits required for the proposed geothermal project.This listing will also show the permitting schedule necessary to maintain the overall project development schedule and detail the anticipated costs. 30.07.06 Direct Use Applications (PEI) Recommendations as to appropriate uses,future development plan requirements and order of magnitude cost estimates for potential direct uses of the geothermal power plant effluent and/or any Makushin Valley shallow resources identified by the USGS will be presented in this subtask. 30.07.07 Economics (PEI) The results of the economic analysis will be submitted in this subtask.The economic analysis will be based on the scope of work as listed in the Power Authority's Request for Proposal,on the geologic and hydrologic load forecast,and on power market analyses provided by the Power Authority.POWER will perform detailed life-cycle cost analyses of a number of power system alternatives for the Unalaska/Dutch Harbor area and report on the input,methodology and findings.We will perform the detailed calculations on our system of in-house IBM AT computers,ensuring that the software used is compatible with the Power Authority hardware. Proposed methods of sensitivity analysis will be noted,and the parameters evaluated described.Also,our analysis will include at least one series of analyses using parameters adopted by the Power Authority for discount rates,fuel escalation rates,and the life cycle projections of major system components. 30.08.00 REPORT PREPARATION (APA/PEI) This task will encompass the following subtasks: 30.08.01 Prepare and Issue Draft Report (PEI) The preparation and issuing to the Power Authority of 10 copies of POWER's Draft Report on the findings and recommendations developed through our feasibility study. O315L IV-32 200) 30.08.02 Incorporate APA Comments and Issue Final Report (APA/PEI) The preparation and issuance of 30 copies of POWER's Final Report on the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study following the Power Authority's review of the Draft Report and the incorporation of changes.POWER will also provide a camera-ready master of the Final Report as well as original maps and drawings with copies of computer software programs developed especially for this project. O315L IV-33 DOME) /APA/PET 30 r PEI 30.01 f GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT .04 START-UP ACTIVITIES .00 .02 RESOURCE ASSESSMENT PROPOSAL REVIEW SCOPE DEFINITION -03 PLANT DESIGN PARAMETERS .04 BINARY POWER SYSTEM .05 SINGLE FLASH POWER SYSTEM -06 DOUBLE FLASH POWER SYSTEM -07 HYBRID POWER SYSTEM -08 TOTAL FLOW POWER SYSTEM 09 BASE CASE DIESEL POWER sys.| .01 ANALYZE EXISTING DATA7) HC/PEI 30.03 f -SUPPORT FACILITIES ANALYSIS a .02 INVESTIGATE PROJECT SITE -03 SITING &CORRIDOR ALTN. -04 ROADS,DOCK &AIRSTRIP -0% 04 --- wa TASK IDENTIFIER SUBTASK IDENTIFIER POWER AUTHORITY REVIEW &APPROVALMILESTONE _a (LEGEND TASK TASK DESCRIPTOR SUBT ASK SUBTASK DESCRIPTOR APA POWER AUTHORITY -PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY PEI POWER =PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY APA/PET POWER AUTHORITY/POWER JOINT RESPONSIBILITY HC/PEI HART CROWSER -SUPPORT RESPONSIBILITY 30 SERVICE IDENTIFIER |.05 CONSTR.&OPERATION ALIN.J PEI 30.02 TRANSMISSION - SYSTEM ANALYSIS .01 START-UP ACTIVITIES -02 DEVELOP SYSTEM REGUIRMENTS .03 ROUTE SELECTION .03 ANALYSIS HC/PEI 30.04 [ENVIR.REVIEW,ASSESS.§)-PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS Ot REVIEW EXISTING DATA -02 DEFINE KEY ISSUES &IMPACTS -03 DEFINE MITIGATION REQT. -04 IDENTIFY PERMIT REQUIREMENTS PEI 30.06 POWER SYSTEM ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .01 START-UP ACTIVITIES -02 PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS .03 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS .04 REPORT GENERATION PEI 30.05 f DIRECT USE GEOTHERMAL ) EVALUATION .04 START-UP ACTIVITIES .02 IDENTIFY USE POTENTIAL .03 ASSESS UTILIZATION IMPACTS -04 RECM.CONCEPTUAL DESIGN(05 EFFLUENT DISPOSAL ALTN.| ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY STUDY PEI 30.07 (FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS .01 OVERALL RECOMMENDATIONS .02 GEOTHERMAL POWER SYSTEM .03 TRANSMISSION LINE .04 CONSTR.&SUPPORT FACILITIES LS |.05 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .05 ENVIR.,MITIGATION &PERMIT .06 DIRECT USE APPLICATIONS .07 ECONOMICS , REVISIONS -___/ /APA/PET 30.08 REPORT PREPARATION .04 DRAFT REPORT -02 FINAL REPORT WITH POWER AUTHORITY COMMENTS POWER ENGINEERS,INC. FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES TASK SEQUENCE DIAGRAM 9a V.SCHEDULE INTRODUCTION The following project schedule is a time-phased representation of the ScopeofWorkfortheUnalaskaGeothermalFeasibilityStudy.The schedule was developed by POWER's proposed project team based on our understanding oftheprojectrequirementsandourexperiencewithsimilarprojects. POWER personnel understand that scheduling is a vital part of projectplanning.Project manpower and cashflow requirements are developed usingProjectSchedulesinconjunctionwithdetailedTaskDescriptions.Theresultisarealisticandaccurateschedulethatprovidesthe time-referenced structure necessary to manage all projects smoothly. The tasks and subtasks listed at left on the schedule are the headings from the Task Descriptions and Task Sequence Diagrams.Numeral coding refers tasks to our Project Status Reporting System. Project managers and engineers compare schedules and semi-weekly or monthlyProjectStatusReportstoensureprojectsprogressaccordingtotheProject Plan.: SCHEDULE COMMENTS The schedule for the Unalaska Project is very tight.The Project must beveryaggressivelypursuedifitistobedoneontimewithalltasksthoroughlyandprofessionallycompleted. The field investigation will have to occur in September,1986.Due to thepotentialforadverseweather,it would not be possible to perform asatisfactoryfieldinvestigationoftheprojectinthelatefallorwinterandexpecttoachievethedesiredresults.Maritime has stated that theywillstillhavetheirhelicopteratDutchHarborthen,so it is our plan toutilizetheirservicesforthefieldinvestigation.All data acquistionsandfieldinvestigationswillrunconcurrently,both to provide for maximum economy and to meet these schedule restrictions. O315L V-1 DMGCrg8eSPOPES The plant design parameters will have to be defined and the conceptual design and cost estimates started prior to the December Ist receipt of the load forecast and power market analysis.To do this,POWER will make assumptions as to the power plant size based on the best available load data and initiate the design work as per the schedule.When the load forecast becomes available,we will adjust the quotations and related design data to match the forecast and thus maintain the schedule. POWER will use our senior level engineering personnel on this project. They are experienced with meeting tight schedules and have many times proven their ability to produce top quality work in limited time frames. Although POWER has approximately 95 technical and support personnel on staff,compared to the engineering giants,we are relatively small.The fact that we are small but have a project team which is uniquely well qualified to do this work is to the benefit of the Power Authority.This is due to the fact that the Project will carry a very high priority for us and we will respond very quickly to correct any schedule deficiencies as they occur.This will enable us to correct any problems before they become unmanageable and thus ensure timely completion of the project. Q315L V-2 C20) ALASKA POWER AUTHORITY TASK SUBTASK YEAR MONTH UNALASKA GEOTHERMAL FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT SCHEDULE ISSUED JULY 23,1986 POWER ENGINEERS,INC. HAILEY,IDAHO 1986 1986 |1987 1987 SEP OCT NOV JAN |FEB I MAR -$"4+3-2"140i12141671849202a22232422627|8 & 30,00 PROJECT CONTROL 30.00.01 PROJECT SUPEAVISION 26 W EEKS 30.00.02 PROJECT STATUS REPOATS 30.00.03 DOCUMENT AND CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL 30.00.04 CLERICAL SUPPORT 30.00.05 PROPOSAL REVIEW 30.04 GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM ASSESSMENT 30.04.01 START-UP ACTIVITIES 30.04.02 RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 30.01.03 PLANT DESIGN PARAMETERS 30.01.04 BINARY POWER SYSTEM EEKS 30.01.05 SINGLE FLASH POWER SYSTEM 30.01.06 DOUBLE FLASH POWER SYSTEM 30.01.07 HYBRID POWER SYSTEM 30.01.08 TOTAL FLOW POWER SYSTEM 30.01.09 BASE CASE DIESEL POWER SYSTEM 30.02 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ANALYSIS 30.02.04 START-UP ACTIVITIES 30.02.02 DEVELOP SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS EEKS 30.02.03 ROUTE SELECTION 30.02.04 ANALYSIS 30.03 SUPPORT FACILITIES ANALYSIS.03.04 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING DATA30.03.02 INVESTIGATE PROJECT SITE 30.03.03 SITING &CORRIDORS 30.03.04 ROADS,DOCK &AIRSTRIP 30.03.05 ALTERNATIVE CONST.&OPERATION 13 WEEKS 30.04 ENVIA,REVIEW ASSESS.&PERMITTING0.04.04 REVIEW EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION-30.04.02 DEFINE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES &IMPACTS 30.04.03 DEFINE MITIGATION REGUIREMENTS 14 WEEKS 30.04.04 IDENTIFY PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 30.04.05 GEOTHERMAL EFFLUENT DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES 30.05 DIRECT USE GEOTHERMAL EVALUATION 30.05.01 START-UP ACTIVITIES 30.05.02 IDENTIFY USE POTENTIAL 6 WEEKS 30.05.03 ASSESS UTILIZATION IMPACTS 30.05.04 RECOMMENDED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 30.05.05 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 30.06 POWER SYSTEM ECONOMIC ANALYSIS0.06.04 START-UP ACTIVITIES30.06.02 PRESENT WOATH ANALYSIS LEGEND TASK TASK DESCRIPTION SUBTASK |-- SUBTASK DESCRIPTION TASK IDENTIFIER SUBTASK IDENTIFIER 5 WEEKS 30.06.03 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 30.06.04 REPORT GENERATION 30.07 FINDINGS &RECOMMENDATIONS 30.07.01 OVERALL RECOMMENDATION 8 Wi EEKS 30.07.02 GEOTHERMAL POWER SYSTEM 30.07.03 TRANSMISSION LINE 30.07.04 CONST.&OPERATION SUPPORT FACILITIES 30.07.05 ENVIRONMENTAL,MITIGATION &PERMITTING 30.07.06 DIRECT USE APPLICATIONS 30.07.07 ECONOMICS 30.08 REPORT PREPARATION 30.08.01 PREPARE &ISSUE DRAFT REPORT 8 WEEKS 30.08.02 POWER AUTHORITY COMMENTS &FINAL REPORT TASK SUBTASK YEAR 43-2"410at42134445461741681920a222324252627SEP OCT JAN |FEB | 1986 |1987 OC LOUEL VI.PROJECT COST OVERALL PROJECT COST SUMMARY The following is a summary of the overall project cost as described in the scope of work to perform the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study for the Power Authority. POWER is commited to the provisions of the Power Authority's sample "Professional Services Contract"listed in Exhibit C of the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study RFP.We will abide by those provisions in Appendix D involving the submital of all vouchers,accounting for all funds and making all disbursements. Samples of our Project Status Reports which display our ability to track costs to the task and subtask level throughout the project are shown in Section II,Management Plan. POWER'S BUDGETING PROCESS The engineering budget included in this section is a product of POWER's integrated Project Management System described in Section II,Project Management. This is a proposed budget only--like the Scope of Work and Schedule,it is subject to the Power Authority's review and approval.The Power Authority will be billed only for the labor and expenses actually incurred through accomplishing project tasks.POWER has an excellent track record meeting project budgets. POWER's project team personnel use a computer-generated budgeting input form to enter labor hours and expenses for each subtask.In the budgeting process,the proposed project team uses the task descriptions from theProjectWorkPlanthatdetail,to the subtask level,the exact scope of work.The project schedule is also used as a guideline for estimating the manpower requirements and expense costs. Labor for each subtask is estimated in man-hours for each of POWER's eight job classifications.These man-hour estimates are then entered into thecomputerwherelaborcostsarecalculatedthroughtheapplicationofthe current fee schedule. O315L VI-I eC Loe) POWER's standard expense costs include airfares,per diem,car rentals, reproduction and communication,field office costs,lease vehicles or long-term vehicle rentals,computer costs and miscellaneous costs.Costs are entered into the computer in unit formats,such as number of trips, days,hours,etc. Sheets which itemize POWER's task and subtask costs are given at the end of this section.In addition,a sheet itemizing the tasks and subtasks which Hart Crowser will complete follows POWER's sheet.These budget sheets are titled "POWER Engineers Tasks"and "Hart Crowser Tasks",respectively. POWER AUTHORITY BUDGET CATEGORIES As requested,we have broken out our costs per the budget categories listed on Page 9 and 10 of the RFP.Also,we have similarly broken out the costs of our subcontractor,Hart Crowser,per these budget categories on subsequent sheets. The sheets that follow on page VI-5 through VI-8 summarize these budget categories in line item format.Following is a description and justification for these items. 1.Direct Labor For direct labor,we broke out costs for each member of our project team employed by POWER.Designers,Draftsmen,and Clerical support positions were lumped together in a group and an average salary rate/hr.was provided.Please see Cost Schedule A,Item 1 for a breakdown of these costs.Project Team members employed by Hart Crowser were broken out in Cost Schedule B,Item 1. 2.Consultants or Subcontractors POWER will utilize Hart Crowser as its subcontractor for the environmental studies and support facilities analysis portions of this project.See cost schedule A for their total costs.For 'the benefit of the Power Authority, we have broken out their costs by the budget categories listed in the RFP. Please see these breakdowns in Cost Schedule B. POWER will also utilize URS Engineers of Anchorage for their oceanographic expertise in the assessment of bottom,tidal,and sedimentation conditions which might affect the feasibility of any underwater transmission line installation and operation.See Cost Schedule A for their rates and estimated #of days. 3.Other Contractual POWER does not anticipate the use of any other contractual obligations for this feasibility study. 0315L VI-2 _@ Dower) a > 4.Equipment Equipment costs for the project include helicopter rental for an aerial inspection and access to the well site,the proposed generation site,the proposed transmission corridors and pipeline corridors.This cost is broken down on Cost Schedule 8 as one of Hart Crowser's costs.POWER will participate in this site inspection with Hart Crowser. 5.Materials and Supplies POWER's reproduction costs for the preparation of camera ready reports are attached to this budget category.Approximately 20 computer-generated mylar drawings are also anticipated.These costs are shown in Cost Schedule A. 6.Computer Costs POWER will utilize its Apollo Computer System described in Section II, Management Plan for CADD drawings.For the economic analysis,POWER willutilizeIBMPC's.Costs for their use are found in Cost Schedule A.Costs for Hart Crowsers computer time can be found in Cost Schedule B. 7.Travel Following award of the contact,POWER will send Bill Lewis to Anchorage to meet with the Power Authority for purposes of Scope of Work review and Project Schedule review.Subsequent to the this review,the man-hour and expense budgets will be revised,if necessary. Another trip will entail sending Bill Lewis,John McGrew,and Mark Forbord to Unalaska Island for a site visit as defined in the Scope of Work.(Tasks 30.1.1 and 30.2.1)This visit will be coordinated with Hart Crowser,who will send Jim Gill and Steve Rog from Anchorage to Unalaska Island for the site visit.See both Cost Schedule A and Cost Schedule B. 8.Other Direct Costs POWER's other direct costs are itemized as requested in the RFP and include telephone and postage costs.These can be found in Cost Schedule A. Hart Crowser's other direct costs include telephone,postage,reproduction, and maps/documents.These can be found in Cost Schedule B. 9.Overhead and General Administrative Expenses This response is based upon a multiplier times the base salary rates listedinItem1(Direct Labor).Please note that the base salary rates do not include the fringe benefit rates listed.This multiplier was computed inaccordancewiththeguidelinesfurnishedinappendixDoftheRFP.POWER'sresponseisinCostScheduleAandHartCrowser's response is in Cost Schedule B. O315L VI-3 \e Zoller) 10.Total Direct and Indirect Costs The direct costs associated with the project are the total of the dollar amounts listed in items 1 through 8.The indirect cost is the dollar amount listed in item 9.Total figures for POWER and its subcontractors are shown in Cost Schedule A. 11.Fee The fee was established as a percentage of the total direct and direct costs. The fee includes a reasonable level of profit margin and normal business operation expenses that were disallowed in the computation of indirect costs. Please see Cost Schedule A.© 12.Total Estimated Price of Proposal POWER's estimated price of the Unalaska Geothermal Feasibility Study was assembled in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the RFP and consists of the dollar amount totals of items 10 and 11,Direct and Indirect.Costs plus Fee.Please see Cost Schedule A for this bottom line figure. O315L VI-4 COME) (->) COST SCHEDULE A 1.POWER DIRECT LABOR FringeEstimatedSalaryBenefits Total Name Project Function Hours Rate/Hr.Cost/Hr.Cost John Cavanaugh,P.E.Instrumentation/Controls Engineer 155 $20.85 $7.05 $4,324.50 Mark Forbord,P.E€.Civil/Structural Engineer/Coordinator 201 19.04 6.44 5,121.48 Clay Fitch Utility Analyst 96 14.42 4.88 1,852.80 Mel Hayob,P.E.Technical Advisor (Substation)12 23.16 7.84 372.00 Larry Henriksen,P.E.Technical Advisor (Transmission)86 23.08 7.81 2,656.54 Dale Kramer,EIT Electrical Engineer 191 22.21 7.5]5,676.52 Bill Lewis,P.E.Project Engineer/Process Engineer 659 21.15 7.16 18,656.29 Ken Lagergren Transmission Engineer 32 14.25 4.82 610.24 John McGrew Lead Transmission Engineer 202 19.23 6.5]5,199.48 Al Munio Project Manager 473 23.08 7.81 14,610.97 Jeff Rostberg Lead Cost and Economic Analyst 66 19.23 6.51 1,698.84 Frank Rowland Land Services/Environmental Coordinator 35 17.31 5.86 810.95 Ron Schroder,P.E.Lead Substation Engineer 64 19.23 6.51 1,647.36 Pete Van Der Meulen Technical Advisor (Transmission)_20 29.81 10.81 812.40 Designer 73 12.00 4.06 1,172.38 Draftsman 379 9.00 3.04 4,563.16 Clerical 198 6.50 2.20 1,722.60 $71,507.56 2.Consultants or Subcontractors #Hour ly Total Name Project Function :Days Rate Cost URS Engineers Oceanographic Studies 5 $72.50 $2,900 Hart Crowser (See Cost Schedule B for Breakdown 47,828 per Power Authority Guidelines)-_ $50,728 3.Other Contractual -None $0 4.Equipment See Cost Schedule B -(Hart Crowser)Helicopter 5.Materials and Supplies Mylars $90.00 Report Reproduction Costs 1,000.00 Other Reproduction 475.00 Total 1,565.0 0316L VI-5 - ,e power) COST SCHEDULE A (cont.) 6.Computer Costs 123 Hours @ $20/Hr.$2460.00 Roundtrip Ground Airfare Costs Total 7.Travel Name Purpose of Travel From -To Bill Lewis Scope of Work Definition Hailey-AnchorageJohnMcGrewSiteVisitHailey-Anchorage Bill Lewis Site Visit Hai ley-AnchorageMarkForbordSiteVisitHailey-Anchorage 8.Other Direct Costs Telephone/Pos tage $2,000 .00 9.Overhead and General Administrative Expenses This figure is based upon the direct salary rates(w/o fringe benefits)times a marker of .743 Bare Salary Cost =71,507.56(.7473)=$53,437.60OGAE=53,437.60(1.2059)=$64,440.40 10.Total Direct and Indirect Costs Direct Cost $132,465.60IndirectCost64,440.40 Total OC &Ic $196,906.00 ll.Fee 12.Total Price $196,906 +18,353 0316L VI-6 800 $265 $1,0651,500 500 2,000 1,500 300 7,800 1,500 300 1,800 Total $6,665.00 $2,000.00 $64 440.40 $196 906.00 $18,353.00 $215 259 .00 DOU) (> COST SCHEDULE B 1.Hart Crowser DIRECT COSTS Estimated Salary Benetits Total Name Project Function Hours Rate/Hr.Cost/Hr.Cost James Gill,P.E.Lead Geotechnical Engineer 74 $32.70 $14.39 $3,484.66 Ross Rieke,P.E.Geotechnical Engineer ) 70 20.75 9.13 2,091.60 Stephen Rog,P.G.Project Geologist 70 21.25 9.31 2,139.20 Dr.James Rybock,CEP Environmental Scientist 44 24.52 10.79 1,553.64 Phillip Thomas Land Use Planner 66 13.75 6.05 1,306.80 Dr.Gail Thompson Environmental/Cultural Resources Spec.52 19.40 8.54 1,452.88 Draftsman (Anchorage)54 11.35 4.99 882.36 Clerical (Anchorage)30 12.00 5.28 518.40 Draftsman (Seattle)8 11.00 4.84 126.32 Clerical (Seattle)23 9.00 3.96 298.08 Direct Labor Total $13,854.34 2.Consultants Total Hourly Total Name Project Function Hours Rate Cost William Wilson Aquatic Scientist 84 $54.25 $4,557 Paul Meyer Hydrologist 104 34.90 3,630 Total Labor $8,187 Other Direct Costs Cost Ground Transportation $100.00 Reproduction 200 .00 Maps/Documents 150.00 Clerical 250.00 Telephone/Shi pping 300.00 Total ODC's 1,000.00 Total (Labor +ODC's)9,187.00 Total +10%Fee $10 106.00 3.Other Contractual -None $0 4.Equipment $3,270.00 Helicopter RentalAerialInspection and Access of the Well Site,Proposed Generation Site,Pipeline CorridorsandTransmissionLineCorridors 03176L VI-7 - ,e@nauer) COST SCHEDULE B (cont.) 5.Materials and Supplies -None £0 6.Computer Costs 52 Hours @ $5/Hr.260 .0 7.Travel for Site Investigation,Round Trip from Anchorage to Dutch Harbor Airfare Ground James Gill $82 $100StephenRog692100 Total $1,584.00 Per Diem: 6 Days @ $100/Day $600.00 Total Travel +Per Diem $2,184.00 8.Other Direct Costs Reproduction $290.00Telephone/Shipping 500.00 Maps/Documents 300 .00 Miscellaneous ,764.00 Total $1,854.00 Total ODC's $1,854.00 9.Overhead and General Administrative Expenses This figure is based upon the direct salary rates(w/o fringe benefits)times a marker of 1.44. Bare Salary Cost =£13854.34(.44)=$9,620.45OGAE=$9,620.45(1.44)=oo $13,853.45 10.Total Direct and Indirect Costs Direct Cost $31,528.34IndirectCost13,853.45 'Total oc &IC $45,381.79 . ,45 381.79 11.Fee 2,446.21 12.Total Price (Hart Crowser) 45,381.79 +2,446.21 =:$47,828.00 0316L VI-8 eLouUel) i TOTALS (#)TOTALS (4) POWER ENGINEERS TASKS P.1 FEE CLASSIFICATIONS a ee -LABOR FEE4.PROJECT.APA_UNALASKAGEOTHERMALPROP00 i HOUR PROJECT LABOR DOLLARS... DATE:@7-25-1966 TOTALS LABOR &EXPENSE BUDGET SUMMARY TPROJECTND9553-4 i PHASE 2 $9 MW FEASIBILITY STUDY be el et ee ed ee oe eeeoeeee eee tel ee ee ee ce ne te ee ne ce cele we ce eee ce rece Gee ne ce ee we eee cot eel ee ee en ee oe 1'a ; s : oc noel cD:'> . BNonugseIrs PStgurs EFBogi$85Se4 HMBoss |S Sesesy «a Amaren re ae SOD v we!5 c 5! . As Ie i = ion a! 3 i = (ataete|28)fois Scarica <3== Slasiool | ai | ; : : ! | ry ''|i : 1 A 1 . . rot , i{|boro joy rr ee \: | ! Re ee me on ea ee ee ee ee wel oe eel eeeantcopecame eremnnsa ann o'-- sinensis coiscicd et eet ew cel melacewe en on ae ee moe elon eeiee we oe :1SO pmsag tis"E°Ea°°GE"2 scenes wl HVE oeoliSs Se Dessi © |{a|OR LR, Fc = =.=t=a |: \ i a SE bod ;rile op : Pa let boas. w meiar! : i | roy ' : iotue | : i ; pi itoa i i | | wa ne we ea ee ee eoa eciedbne cepectee ce een rete cece ae ne ae ne ne ne cette ee neste oe el eeeeece oe cere ee ne ete ce eee ee ; ouSaeto =segg°°Rs g "ger ggf STB OGT1SD TDeeesowyi ' ;™e SASS ,as 1SSRP) og : mie ene : 4 : : 5 x eearr Corry Ceer 29"e080rs] mo ais : . = Te SR ¢ j i i DG i | : ' 14 ti i| ok ya : i : t en Le aeee ee SeeeOeSe a a ee nee ae , bos { ptey ! ' : !pg ! : i : : |ga218 REVS|SPR)sidielne= = 2 TR qe bi| nn eeee ee Poste lileigsideegigci.feo: Ue ! : 2ij 1 'ser worco an ! > PoE a|pBS)BSRBRSS By be | |::| ot ;|= - -- id-- i" |i4 , | en ee pp | 1ia| |' inaa '<' 1! = i cs ont pobg iota en ee ;i| ry it i po: tye4 : :oa | EATS|fig at hy bands Def ta, ' | co ;fli' =|:;bat :: ri i= a ||\ Para a|'|i ':Pta ty*. a i beaded be id pedadePepa bbe pd Pep he Gy Pred Po dh pada a 1 |||ite|| i |! Tbhi|leet fg Pat | io. rtTeEy Sawa: il rm Poa Peep tata bb|! pee eadipadgbya poy i it rn :!: iht i {:| : ft poo ai if| ne ae eeee | to: | Oren eaten - RSGpili, be = epobebdaliiabh abaalahbe ie : Ji \ 4: _ of : mG : ' oc; (¥ga gigi gees |jgegig gaggia ii:'lpe aig Pep pase 18|PSS Saigg Meastie iri ho) i ays epttytoad boadife tteFaibt} pi4 ' ityto=i; da! Jats REERaae '= > perbit capeapyyd pidot PTE pp i IPE eeeee es {afwdefcethl cingeeledeneedetn cedmejgheel cere ceednendod eet eee a ee ee eee TTT eee ! i ! { soi? ' vo cheoa fd 1 ! . : || tadeasiig giagtodas!s "sass rs weer eRs poled ttetbepepedrah Gtiepbs | mt 7 "1 74va 1 -- "4 =4-a-4alaadood r4edea "4 --a4 emedee eden dee--cae"4 7mt et te ne me ns co re rs ee te ntwneo 2 a2, 281) jaan. 80. fe ete F istj 2) Blige Sala. USBfa iil 26 S9492 aHE) BB RSSg8Basga8 Begtyd 8 gig #o!|) Sea igy, 2 8 |) geagee|sacgas al,ias924/\ ged|)ag FEPaECETELE wy uwi ee . : Py 4S x RABY | Gags ||EEBe: g2hSge FETE|lePEE24/|LEA Sd234|=a .4a5 EEddsigRE:betsieSa|.aad| agags gosod oe BEH2SS) HI§o rae i. ud, aq _ zeesa : aoT= oraq4 - aot 3 i isaSsde. HSoOlF PiPere eamecEEEErE 4g' 23322. aaa2, #334333 por ft td poh i : ' rb toa ' : to : ,: 'dadase i'|eiedoodagsetdealonoy aad|| lamin : aa? 1 { soe pee go ae iGo. 13 i i Midedede t) ddesit yates|leyeneycacti ww : to. {; i 4s fa (dpa : Se ee i #eaase lo 'RARBSBRARS ASA | Same 3RZRIa8 we dntedeneecone cee eeedada eeeinintate wane need aadfdanjnand ee neneng ee ne ee ee ee ceeg ee ce ee ego| LABOR &EXPENSE BUDGET SUMMARY DATE:67-25-1936 POWER ENGINEERS TASKS P.2 |PROJECTNO.2653-4 LAR 1 FEE CLASSIFICATIONS.ee {LABOR "EXPENSE 1 LABOR tb+PROJECT;AEA-UNALASKA.GEOTHERMAL.PROP LO HOUR.kPROJECTLABORDOLLARS -S$$9SSSSS58 0._...3}DOLLAR ft DOLLARof EXPENSE 1 1>FHASE 46 MW FEASIGILITY STUDY.TOTALS whee Bod.2 3.2.8 LB,6.7 TOTALS ($)1 TOTALS ($)mi TOTALS (#00' 4 nH '|||||||L co .tooo.non -oe ae nae ee OeooGEOTHERMALDIRECTUSEEVMtkaceeei- Be Bo i308...8 1.Startup Activities oo aS a.we cnneer ce RD.ee .i 231 Mb |2B. 4..30..52 IdentifyUsePotential i o H 1,178 L 1.170 $@ |1,170 3 1 30.5.3.Assess Utilization Impacts 01 1b}878 vce en oe a 7B oi A BBi.40.5.4 Recommended Comeptual Des =|IS (tC CC'"'"C(*!”!SCOC;C*C*C™W een ee BB BB 38.5.5 Econ Analysis.4.1 tb....BH _-_a ._378.Q i -878 | i ---L -i poenas -cee --=ae dee i ee , Pe SUBTOTAL.{Qt.Q@ 4,095 ee Be Q i 4,095 ¢.a a ee Se oe H i :L i i HaeePOWERSYSTEMECON.ANALYSIS ot -ee bow 28 ba4.20..6.1 Startup Activities 00 A .ae|i 4,735 3 @t 1,735 1 L a0..6.2 Present Worth Analysis.2 od OO ee ee 1)Se en or ene FELid.6.2 Sensitivity Analysis H c:S25 950 _ai 1535 43 1.585 ot. i:_#06.4 Report Generation to 48S 959 {86 ASB ae 137b to 18 ta wd .-oer rt ry wees ene ee enoneae nena ne ee ee ai reneeel H _HdoceeeeeeeeeeSUBTOTAL|nn nn nee ese >a ee ee o.135 '8.2:506 a7 ee rn ee newness sees cece eee ena Ho,ee OE:3.7.98 FINQINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS _4 a tt.Lo.__.. I ne ee ce a;1.07 1 Overall |Recommendation to.%)t 1,178 oe L 11765.-®t 4,37 3 t 30.7.2.Type &Size of Geo.System 1 S$fo 878 ._.oe ._ i 873 4 8 teri..7..3 Inang.bineType,Roubing.Etc,of IS i $78 i 878 8 BB 1 3.7.4°Plant &T.LineConstruction.i K)t 1,755 ; H 1,755 |8 1 45S138.7.5 Ew.Mitigntion&Permitting of ®t SY:nn _'L785 4 Ot ALIS (30.7.6.Birect Use Applications _H 2 H _1,178 a. H 1,178 |be {,174 |4 8,.1 7 _Economirs H Ya fo SS09:Se .!1478 t Ob ae boo SETOIN |58 @ 8,778 a oe 9 @ 8 @ 4 8,775} a eee Fe Loo Poo wee ce ee _.' a 4d eee he ae13.8.0 REPORT PREPARATION,=_ee ee.__ea rn Tate @i.Lbt3@.8.1.Prepare&[ssue Draft Report |16g 2M Oe 195 '3,935 3 288 ABS3.8.2_IncorporateAPAComents L 4.1.170 ce a LTR 796 i 2.4EO So SUBTOTAL i 148 _@ 3510 @ @ @ ee <n SS:rs Pe a i Ce "SERVICE TOTAS $|2590.L 5.220 124,72 6,000 LSAA102 388 |.AS88931 $13,900.¢t-I8 ab-a Ne me ee eee :es i }ww «=PE PROJECTTOTALSae P2999 E8220 124.7726.18,612 3,86 153,58)f 13,508 cLi;i 1 'H i LABOR fe EXFENEE BUBGET SUMMARY DATE:@7=2h-|,HART GCROWSER TASKS L PROJECT NO.9653-5 !LABOR 1 FEE CLASSIFICATIONS = tS” LAR ;EXPENSE =}LABORS;PROJECT:AFA UNALAGKA GEOTHERMAL PROF.HOUR 5}PROJECT LABOR DOLLARS «=<(atss HEH T ET TS 'DOLLAR «=}GOLLAR =}EXPENSE |PHASE:1@ MW FEASIBILITY STUBY . $TOMS Q I 2 3 4 5 ,|TOTALS ($)$TOTALS ($) 1 HART CROWSER STUGY SERVICES =aaa .oo _7 4 cob 1 3@ 3.SUPFORT FACILITIES ANALYSIS rs a}e 3 8] 1.38.31.Analysis of Existing Data_ry en enn 7:n\n _.64 H 1434 1 19 fA 62 1 db 3.2 Investigate Frogect fate Fa Oe7,3,600 |6,063 |ORY 1 30.3.3.ALE.Siting&Corridors 5S }.366 ee ty eee 71 16@ '3,051 |143!Bld »30.3.6 Roeds,Dock and Airstrip H 13 'eb Be ;ee Yi:'1,136 3 ee)118 4 '30.3.5 Alt.Const.and Operations,{1d 3,868 "416@ 7.«4,h22 328 '8,962 |363 I 9,325 | Bo "SupToTaL st i285 |:tC<"'«';*;*C*'C (titi C '18,205 |6,807 }25,012 $ 'T3504.@ ASSESS ENVIRON,REGS.&PERMIT $$2 6 $_a : :|"eb 2 OF a 00.4 4 Review Existing Env Info,'$7 H ee,ee ne1 2 _.2 '3,186 3 3,065 |-6,284 130.4.2.Define Env.Issues 4 Impacts ee:Se ee:|Se 1050.1.490 H 1456 3 5.38 i.8,7941120.4 3 Define Mitigation Requirements |AS}ee oe 458 156 256 '256 3 BAT {30...4.4 Identify Permit Requirements oo:645 od LM.6a ti(i'('(ststé'i-'a SB OH BG 588i 2,772 ty 336.4.05 Geothermal Effluent Disposal 0 4.a a a:65 8 i .ae {7 wai soaerente aimee rapeganegannannaiaiaaa meri H ee nae } __SUBTOTAL}206 =RO 8297 BN 1,059 |OHA P2Ee } Loe ee oe .od nn aan appeennppnnl imaial '|anto-SERVICE TOTALS5 #1 |G REO 3,300 12,480 2,970 2,849 8696 4,555 3 18,273 |47,626 1 .ce es 'a ;i at 1 __a Poona enna nanan ne =ay 1 14%PROJECT TOTALS $44 'A}6660 3,312,880 2,970 de 1,6 29,555 $16,273 |47,828 $ t 5 t i)i 4 t PLUSSngneashoapaeed